19744 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

While changes to the Pricing 

Schedule pursuant to this proposal are 

effective upon filing, the Exchange has 

designated these changes to be operative 

on June 1, 2012. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The Exchange believes that its 

proposal to amend its Pricing Schedule 

is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 

Act 5 in general, and furthers the 

objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 6

in particular, in that it is an equitable 

allocation of reasonable fees and other 

charges among Exchange members. The 

Exchange believes that the fee change is 

reasonable because the Exchange’s 

collection of ORF has declined due to a 

decrease in industry volume and the 

adjustment would serve to provide the 

Exchange with additional ORF. The 

additional ORF offsets regulatory 

expenses, but does not exceed 

regulatory costs. 

The Exchange believes that the ORF is 

equitable and not unfairly 

discriminatory because it is objectively 

allocated to Exchange members in that 

it would continue to be charged to all 

members on all of their transactions that 

clear as customer at OCC. The Exchange 

is assessing higher fees to those member 

firms that require more Exchange 

regulatory services based on the amount 

of customer options business they 

conduct. In addition, the ORF seeks to 

recover the costs of supervising and 

regulating members, including 

performing routine surveillances, 

investigations, examinations, financial 

monitoring, and policy, rulemaking, 

interpretive, and enforcement activities. 

The ORF is not charged for member 

proprietary options transactions because 

members incur the costs of owning 

memberships and through their 

memberships are charged transaction 

fees, dues and other fees that are not 

applicable to non-members. 

Additionally, the dues and fees paid by 

members go into the general funds of 

the Exchange, a portion of which is used 

to help pay the costs of regulation. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The Exchange does not believe that 

the proposed rule change will impose 

any burden on competition not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were either 

solicited or received. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.7 At any time 

within 60 days of the filing of the 

proposed rule change, the Commission 

summarily may temporarily suspend 

such rule change if it appears to the 

Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. If the Commission 

takes such action, the Commission shall 

institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule should be 

approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–Phlx–2012–36 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Phlx–2012–36. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 

10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing 

also will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. All comments received will 

be posted without change; the 

Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– 

2012–36 and should be submitted on or 

before April 23, 2012. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.8

Kevin M. O’Neill, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7771 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

Advanced BioPhotonics, Inc., 

Advanced Viral Research Corp., 

Brantley Capital Corp., Brilliant 

Technologies Corporation, 4C 

Controls, Inc., and 2–Track Global, 

Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading 

March 29, 2012. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Advanced 

BioPhotonics, Inc. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Advanced 

Viral Research Corp. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2008. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Brantley 

Capital Corp. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended September 30, 2004. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19745 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Brilliant 

Technologies Corporation because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended March 31, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 4C Controls, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2009. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 2–Track 

Global, Inc. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2009. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 

trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 29, 

2012, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT 

on April 12, 2012. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7942 Filed 3–29–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

Angstrom Microsystems Corp., 

Bedminster National Corp., Brake 

Headquarters U.S.A., Inc., and 

BrandPartners Group, Inc.; Order of 

Suspension of Trading 

March 29, 2012. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Angstrom 

Microsystems Corp. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2008. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Bedminster 

National Corp. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended September 30, 2008. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Brake 

Headquarters U.S.A., Inc. because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 1998. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 

BrandPartners Group, Inc. because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2009. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 

trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 29, 

2012, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT 

on April 12, 2012. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7943 Filed 3–29–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

[Dispute No. WTO/DS429] 

WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding 

Regarding United States; AntiDumping Measures on Certain Shrimp 

from Viet Nam 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the United 

States Trade Representative (AUSTR@) 

is providing notice that on February 21, 

2012, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’) requested consultations 

with the United States under the 

Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the 

World Trade Organization (AWTO 

Agreement@) concerning certain 

antidumping administrative reviews 

and a sunset review conducted by the 

Department of Commerce on imports of 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam (Investigation A–552–802), and 

various U.S. laws, regulations, 

administrative procedures, practices, 

and methodologies. That request may be 

found at www.wto.org contained in a 

document designated as WT/DS429/1. 

USTR invites written comments from 

the public concerning the issues raised 

in this dispute. 

DATES: Although USTR will accept any 

comments received during the course of 

the dispute settlement proceedings, 

comments should be submitted on or 

before April 13, 2012, to be assured of 

timely consideration by USTR. 

ADDRESSES: Public comments should be 

submitted electronically using 

www.regulations.gov, docket number 

USTR–2012–0003. If you are unable to 

provide submissions using 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

If (as explained below) the comment 

contains confidential information, then 

the comment should be submitted by 

fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 

395–3640. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

J. Daniel Stirk, Associate General 

Counsel, Office of the United States 

Trade Representative, 600 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395– 

3150. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is 

providing notice that consultations have 

been requested pursuant to the WTO 

Understanding on Rules and Procedures 

Governing the Settlement of Disputes 

(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should 

fail to resolve the matter and a dispute 

settlement panel is established pursuant 

to the DSU, such panel, which would 

hold its meetings in Geneva, 

Switzerland, would be expected to issue 

a report on its findings and 

recommendations within nine months 

after it is established. 

Major Issues Raised by Vietnam 

On February 21, 2012, Vietnam 

requested consultations regarding 

certain antidumping administrative 

reviews and a sunset review conducted 

by the Department of Commerce on 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam, referring in particular to the 

use of what it describes as ‘‘zeroing’’ in 

those reviews. Specifically, Vietnam 

challenges (1) the imposition of 

antidumping duties and cash deposit 

requirements pursuant to the final 

results of the fourth administrative 

review for the period from February 1, 

2008, to January 31, 2009, in Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 47771 (August 9, 2010); 

(2) the fourth administrative review of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

insofar as it did not revoke the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

certain respondents requesting such 

revocation; (3) the imposition of 

antidumping duties and cash deposit 

requirements pursuant to the final 

results of the fifth administrative review 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES