# Slne/olr. JIIi
December 1, 2006 CERTIFIEDMAIL: ReceiptNo: 70053110000362730356 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Mr. Eddie Terrill Director, Air Quality Division Oklahoma Depart111ent ofEnvironmental Quality P.O. Box 1677
., Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677

Re: SinclairTulsa Refining Company . OAC 252:100-8-73 . Visibility Modeling and BART Waiver Request' Dear Mr. Terrill:

. . 

### The Sinclair TulsaRefining Company (Sinclair) has been identified as potentially subject to BART under the Regional Haze Program. Sinclair contracted with Trinity Consultants to

. perform CALPUFF refined modeling to determine the Tulsa Refinery's impact on nearby

Class I 

### areas. The attached modeling study report confirms the visibility impact is less than the 0.5 deciview threshold at Class I receptors located within 300 kilometers from the refinery. In accordance with OAC 252:100-8-73, Sinclair is requesting a waiver from DEQ that a BART determination for the Tulsa Refinery is not required. 

## Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please contact Steve Moyer a.t (918) 588-1197. r--_..___.._ .. 

# 9Jhtr

. J. M. Kapura .

Acting Refinery Manager SFM/cjr. Attachments cc: 

### Trinity Consultants, OKC CM 7005 3110 0003 6273 0295 RRR Rhonda Jeffries ODEQ-ROAT 3105 E. Skeily Dr. Suite 200 Tulsa, OK 74105 

# SinclairTulsa RefiningCODJpany P.o. BOX 970, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74101 9181584-5025

# • • CALPUFF BART MODELING REPORT • REFINEDANALYSIS SINCLAIR TULSA REFINING COMPANY • TULSA REFINERY

Prepared 

### by: Steve Moyer • Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Jennifer Sanchez • Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Vern Choquette • Principal Consultant Don Whitney, PE • Managing Consultant Eugene Chen, PE • Senior Consultant Jeremy Townley • Consultant
TRINITY CONSULTANTS 

### 120 East Sheridan Suite 205 OklahomaCity, OK 73104 (405) 228-3292

December 1,2006


### Project 063701.0063



# RECEIVED



# I U£C 0 

# 5 ?:8fJS/ 

# AIR 

# au

# T~ Llr

# IhrA 

# .. cihts

### TABLE OF CONTENTS


### 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY•••••••......... .....................•••••••••••••••••••••...................••••.•.... 

### 1-1 

### 1.1 BACKGROlJ}..'D....................................................................................................... 

### 1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVE ............................................................................................................ 

### 1-1 1.3 LOCATION OF SOURCES AND RELEVANT CLASS 

### I AREAS ..................................... 

### 1-2 1.4 MODEL RESULTS .................................................................................................. 

### 1-2 

## 2. CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM.........................................................................

### 2-1 2.1 MODEL VERSIONS.....................•.••...............................................•••••.•..................

### 2-1 2.2 MODELING DOMAIN .................................................•....•......................................

### 2-2 

## 3. CALMET............................................................................................................3-1 3.1 GEOPHYSICAL DATA.............................................................................................

### 3-1 3.1.1 TERRAIN DATA ................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 LAND USE DATA.................................................................................................3-3 

### 3.2 METEOROLOGICAL DATA ..................................................................................... 

### 3-4 3.2.1 MESOSCALE MODEL DATA................................................................................. 3-4 3.2.2 SURFACE DATA ................................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.3 UPPERAIRDATA ................................................................................................ 3-5 3.2.4 PRECIPITATION DATA ......................................................................................... 3-5 

### 3.3 CALMET PROCESSING CONTROL ........................................................................

### 3-6 

### 4. CALPUFF........................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 BART-ELIGIBLE SOURCES .................................................,.................................

### 4-1 4.2 SOURCE EMISSIONS DATA ....................................................................................

### 4-1 4.2.1 PM IO 

### EMISSIONS..................................................................................................4-2 4.2.2 STACK PARAMETERS ........................................................................................... 4-3 

### 4.3 RECEPTORLOCATIONS..........................................................................................

### 4-3 4.4 BACKGROUND OZONE ..........................................................................................

### 4-6 4.5 BACKGROUND AMMONIA ...........................................................................•....•....

### 4-7 4.6 CALPUFF MODEL CONTROL PARAMETERS ........................................................

### 4-7 

## 5. CALPOST...........................................................................................................5-1 5.1 LIGHT EXTINCTION ALGORITHM...........................................................................

### 5-1 5.2 CALPOST PROCESSING METHOD.........................................................................

### 5-1 5.3 NATURAL BACKGROUND ......................................................................................

### 5-2 5.4 EVALUATINGBART-EXEMPTION .....••.....................................................••••......... 

### 5-2 

## 5.5 SUMMARY OF CALPOST CONTROL PARAMETERS...............................................

## 5-2 

## 6. MODELRESULTS .................................................................................................

### 6-1 APPENDIX 

### A - EMISSION DATA


### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063APPENDIX B - DATA FILELIST APPENDIX 

### C - MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT FILES



### ii SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultaots TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 2-1. CALPUFF M9DELING SYSTEM VERSION NUMBERS...................................•.....................2-1 TABLE 2-2. VERTICAL GRID STRUCTURE...............•••..........................•...•.•.•.......•..............................2-3 TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY OF CALMET INPUTS ............••.....•••.......•.•••.•........•••......•............................... 3-7 TABLE 4-1. BOILERCONSTRUCTION DATE SUMMARY ..................................................................... .4-1 TABLE 4-2. ESTIMATED 24-HOURAVERAGE EMISSION RATES .........................................................4-2 TABLE 4-3. SPECIATED PM 1 0 EMISSIONS ..........................................................................................4-3 TABLE 4-4. POINT SOURCE STACK PARAMETERS ..............................................................................4-3 TABLE 4-5. SUMMARY OF CALPUFF INPUTS....................................................................................4-7 TABLE 5-1. MONTHLY HUMIDITY FACTORS ...................................................................................... 5-1 TABLE 5-2. DEFAULT AVERAGE ANNUAL NATURAL BACKGROUND LEVELS................................... 5-2 TABLE 5-3. SUMMARY OF CALPOST INPUTS ................................................................................... 5-2 TABLE 6-1. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR CANEY CREEK 2001-03................................ 6-1 TABLE 6-2. VISIBILITY IMPACTMODEL RESULTS FOR HERCULES GLADES 2001-03 ........................ 6-2 TABLE 6-3. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR UPPER BUFFALO 2001-03 ............................. 6-3 TABLE 6-4. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR WICHITA MOUNTAINS 2001-03 .................... 6-4



### iii Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### LIST OF 

### FIGURES

FIGURE 

### 1-1. LOCATION OF TuLSA REFINERY AND NEARBY CLASS 

### I AREAS .................................... 

### 1-3 FIGURE 2-1. PROPOSED MODELING DOMAIN.....................................................................................2-2 FIGURE 

### 3-1. PLOT OF MODELING DOMAIN USGS TERRAIN DATA ................................................... 

### 3-2 FIGURE 

### 3-3. PLOTOF SURFACE STATIONS ......................................................................................... 

### 3-5 FIGURE 

### 3-4. PLOT OF PRECIPITATION STATIONS................................................................................ 

### 3-6 FIGURE 4-1.WIClllTA MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ..........................................4-4 FIGURE 4-2. CANEY CREEK WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS .....................................................4-4 FIGURE

### 4-3. HERCULES-GLADES WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS.............................................4-5 FIGURE 4-4. UPPER BUFFALO WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ................................................. .4-6



### iv SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

## 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


## 1.1 BACKGROUND On July 1, 1999, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published the final Regional Haze Rule (RHR). The objective ofthe RHR is to improve visibility in 156 specific areas across the United States, known as Class I areas. The Clean Air Act defines Class I areas as certain national parks (over 6,000 acres), wilderness areas (over 5,000 acres), national memorial parks (over 5,000 acres), and international parks that were in existence on August 7, 1977. On July 6, 2005, the EPA published amendments to its 1999 RHR, often called the BART rule, which included guidance for making source-specific BestAvailable Retrofit Technology (BART) determinations. The BARTrule defines BART-eligible sources as sources that meet the following criteria: (1) 

### Have potential emissions ofat least 250 tons per year ofa visibility-impairing pollutant, (2) Were "in existence" between August 7, 1962 and August 7, 1977, and (3) Are listed as one ofthe 26 listed source categories in the guidance. A BART-eligible source is not automatically subject to BART. Rather, BART-eligible sources are subject-to-BART ifthe sources are "reasonably anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any federal mandatory Class I area." EPA has determined that sources are reasonably anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment ifthe visibility impacts from a source are greaterthan 0.5 deciviews (dv) when compared against a natural background. Air quality modeling is the tool that is used to determine a source's visibility impacts. States have the authority to exempt certain BART-eligible sources from installing BART controls ifthe results ofthe dispersion modeling demonstrate that the source cannot reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in a Class I area. Further, states also have the authority to define the modeling procedures for conducting modeling related to making BART determinations. To promote consistency between states in the development ofBART modeling protocols and to harmonize the approaches between adjacent RPOs, the Central States Regional Air Planning (CENRAP) organization developed BARTModeling Guidelines (December 15, 2005). The intent of the guidelines is to assist CENRAP states and source operators in the development ofstatewide and source-specific modeling protocols. 

## 1.2 OBJECTIVE The objective ofthis document is to provide a report summarizing the model results and the modeling methods and procedures that were followed by Trinity when conducting refined modeling for Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company's (Sinclair) Tulsa Refinery located in Tulsa, OK in Tulsa County. 1-1 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

## 1.3 LOCATION OF SOURCES AND RELEVANT CLASS

## I AREAS Sinclair's Tulsa Refinery is located in Tulsa, OK, and has the potential to emit more than 250 tpy of certain BART pollutants. Sinclair has identified the sources listed in Appendix A at the Tulsa Refinery as sources that meet the three criteria for being BART-eligible sources. These sources include:
• Unit 6156, 120 MMBtulhr stripper reboiler & 65 MMBtu/hr fractionator reboiler • Unit 6157, 55 MMBtu/hr reboiler • Unit 6162, 100 MMBtu/hr splitter reboiler & 75 MMBtulhr stabilizer reboiler • Unit 6163, 120 MMBtulhr CRU charge, 101 MMBtu/hr intermediate and 25 MMBtulhr intermediate • Unit 6152, sulfur recovery unit (SRU) • Unit 6154, flare #2 • Unit CT-8, cooling tower #8 A detailed summary ofBART-eligibility is included in Section 4.2. As described in CENRAP's BART Modeling Guidelines, Class I areas within 300 Ian ofthe station are included in this refined analysis. The following Class I areas fall withinthis 300 Ian radius: 

### Class I Area Name Distance from source (km) Caney Creek Wilderness 252 Hercules-Glades Wilderness 276 Upper Buffalo Wilderness 229 Wichita Mountains National Wildlife Refuge 282 Figure 1-1 provides a plot ofthe location ofthe Tulsa Refinery in relationto these Class I areas. 

## 1.4 MODELRESULTS Model results from the refined analysis are included in Section 6. As summarized in this section, the Tulsa Refinery meets the exemption criteria established in CENRAP's

### BARTModeling Guidelines (December 15,2005).

1-2 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063FIGURE 1-1. LOCATION OF TULSA REnNERY AND NEARBY CLASS 

### I AREAS

Note: Tulsa Rcfincry, Class I area, and domain boundary locations presented above are approximations for visual purposes and are not exact. 

### 1-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701 .0063

## 2. CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM


### The main components ofthe CALPUFF modeling system are CALMET, CALPUFF, and CALPOST. CALMET is the meteorological model that generates hourly three-dimensional meteorological fields such as wind and temperature. CALPUFF simulates the non-steady state transport, dispersion, and chemical transformation ofair pollutants emitted from a source in "puffs". CALPUFF calculates hourly concentrations ofvisibility affecting pollutants at each specified receptor in a modeling domain. CALPOST is the post-processor for CALPUFF that computes visibility impacts from a source based on the visibility affecting pollutant concentrations that were output by CALPUFF. 

## 2.1 MODELVERSIONS 

### Earth Tech, Inc. is the primary developer ofthe CALPUFF modeling system and all related programs. The versions ofthe CALPUFF modeling system programs that Trinity used for the TulsaRefinery's modeling are listed in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 also compares the program versions that Trinity used with the program versions recommended by CENRAP. Note that some ofthe program versions are not the same as the program versions recommended by CENRAP. Certain programs were utilized in order to avoid data compatibility issues with previous versions ofthe CALPUFF system. Trinity used the following software version numbers listed below. Model selection was primarily driven by a desire to utilize the most recent release ofCALMET. CALPUFF and CALPOST executable versions were then selected as appropriate for compatibility.
TABLE 2-1. CALPUFF MODELING SYSTEM VERSION NUMBERS Program CENRAP Suggested Tulsa Refinery Refined Analysis Reason for Difference Version Level Version Level 

### TERREL 3.311 030709 3.311 030709 CTGCOMP 2.42 030709 2.22 030528 Version recommended is not available 

### CTGPROC 2.42 030709 2.42 030709 MAKEGEO 2.22 030709 2.22 030709 CALMM5 2.4 050413 2.4 050413 CALMET 5.53a 040716 6.211 060414 Most recent release of CALMET 

### CALPUFF 5.711a 040716 6.112 060412 Use version compatible with CALMETv6.211 

### POSTUTIL 1.4 040818 1.4 040818 CALPOST 5.51 

### 030709 6.131 060410 Use version compatible with CALPUFF 6.112

i "


### 2-1 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

## 2.2 MODELINGDOMAIN Trinity utilized a modeling domain that extends at least 50 km in all directions beyond the Tulsa Refinery and each ofthe four surrounding Class I areas. The map projection for the modeling domain is Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC) and the coordinate system will be North American Datum 1927 (NAD27), which is an LCC projection. The meteorological grid spacing is 3 km. The southwest comer ofthe modeling domain is Latitude 33.25°N, Longitude 100.soW which was assigned as the 

### 0, 0 reference point for the domain. The northeast comer ofthe modeling domain is approximately Latitude 37.25°N, Longitude 92°W. At a grid spacing 00 

### km, the number ofX 

### grid cells is 256 and the number ofY grid cells will be 155. Figure 2-1 provides a plot ofthe modeling domain with respect to the sources and Class I areas. FIGURE 2-1. PROPOSED MODELING DOMAIN

500 450 400 Hercules-Glades 

# •
e Tuls",OK SincialiRefinery

### Oklahom~City_ OK

### Nor~n_OK 150 100 50 I I

### o~~L~_~_~_~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~~~~~~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~_~_~_~~_~_~~~ 

### o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 BOO Lambert Conformal Conic (Xl (km) 

### Forthe purposes ofthis analysis, the CALMET and CALPUFF domains are identical for each analysis and are singularly referred to herein as the "domain." 2-2 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### The horizontal domain is comprised ofgrid cells, each containing a central grid point at which meteorological and computational parameters are calculated at each time step. Forthis analysis, grid spacing intervals of3 

### kIn are selected to resolve terrain features within the domain. Table 2-2 summarizes the vertical grid structure selected for both analyses. The cell face height ofeach cell indicates its vertical extent. The vertical domain is also composed ofterrain-following grid cells, the number and size ofwhich are chosen so as to constrain the boundary layer in which dispersion and chemical transformations take place. TABLE 2-2. VERTICAL 

### GRIn STRUCTURE 

### Cell Face Height Vertical Grid Cell (meters) 1 20 2 40 

### 3 80 4 160 

### 5 320 

### 6 640 

### 7 1,200 

### 8 2,000 9 3,000 10 4,000



### 2-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

## 3. CALMET Trinity conducted a three-year CALMET analysis incorporating both mesoscale model and observation meteorological datato generate three years ofCALMET outputs to be used as inputs to CALPUFF. The CALMET model requires the input ofgeophysical data, meteorological data, and model parameter settings. The CALMET modeling procedures that Trinity used generally follows the recommendations in CENRAP's protocol. It 

### should be noted that Trinity used surface and precipitation data but not upper air observations in this CALMET analysis. As a result, some of CENRAP's recommendations may not apply. 

## 3.1 GEOPHYSICALDATA CALMETrequires geophysical datato characterize the terrain and land use parameters that potentially affect dispersion. Terrain features affect flows and create turbulence in the atmosphere and are potentially subjected to higher concentrations ofelevated puffs. Different land uses exhibit variable characteristics such as surface roughness, albedo, Bowen ratio, and leaf-area index that also effect turbulence and dispersion. 

### 3.1.1 TERRAIN 

### DATA 

### Trinity used terrain dataobtained from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) in 1­ degree (1 

### :250,000 scale or approximately 90 meter resolution) digital format. A list ofthe USGS terrain files used in the analyses is provided in Appendix B. 

### A plot ofthe land elevation for the modeling domain based on the referenced files is provided in Figure 3-1.

3-1 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063FIGURE 

### 3-1. PLOT OF MODELING DOMAIN 

### USGS TERRAIN DATA

## ~ 900 800 c 0 700 

### U ro 

### E 600 '-­ 0 '<­ C 0 500 

### U -I-' '-­ 400 m ..0 

### E ro 300 ---1 

## 10 200 100 

### o 

## 100 200 300 LlOO 

## 500 600 700 Meters (.Above MSL) 

### Lambert Conformal Conic (X) (km)
3-2 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 

### 063701.0063

### Trinity used the TERREL program to generate grid-cell elevation averages from the USGS terrain data across the modeling domain. 

### 3.1.2 LAND

### USE DATA 

### Trinity used USGS Composite Theme Grid (CTG) format Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) data files at 1:250,000 resolutions. Where 1:250,000 land use data was not available, Trinity used USGS data at 1: 1 00,000 resolutions. A list ofthe USGS land use files that were used is provided in Appendix 

### B. Trinity used the CTGPROC program to generate land use for each grid cell from the LULC data across the modeling domain. Since the USGS CTG format LULC data files must be compressed prior to use in the CTGPROC utility processor, Trinity compressed the files using the program CTGCOMP.

3-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063FIGURE

### 3-2. PLOT OF MODELING DOMAIN LAND USE LAND COVER DATA

400 

# ! 2:: 300 u ·c o () 

### ro 

### E $2 c 200 o () t Q) .c !G -.J 100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Lambert Conformal Conic (X) (km)
10 = Urban 50 =Water 20 =AlYicuttural Land 60 =WeUand 30 = Rangeland 70 = Barren Land 40 = Forest Land 80 =Tundra 80 = Perennial Snow or Ice 

## 3.2 METEOROLOGICAL DATA CALMET was used to assimilate data for 2001, 2002, and 2003 using mesoscale model output and National Weather Service (NWS) surface station observations, upper air station observations, and precipitation station observations to develop the meteorological field. 

### 3.2.1 MESOSCALE MODEL DATA 

### Hourly mesoscale data was used to supplement the hourly surface, upper air, and precipitation observation data. The mesoscale data was used to define the initial guess field for the CALMET simulations. Trinity used the following 5th 

### generation mesoscale model meteorological data (or MM5 data):

... 200I MM5 data (12 km resolution),

... 2002 MM5 data (36 km 

### resolution), and

... 2003 MM5 data (36 km 

### resolution) 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10



### 3-4 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

## 3.2.2 SURFACE DATA 

### The use ofmultiple stations for meteorological observations in CALMET/CALPUFF provides a substantial enhancement over the steady-state treatment ofobservations from a single meteorological station. Parameters affecting turbulent dispersion that are observed hourly at surface stations include wind speed and direction, temperature, cloud cover and ceiling, relative humidity, and precipitation type. Surface data were extracted from among the surface stations listed in Appendix B and are illustrated in Figure 3-3. These sources were selected from the available data inventory to optimize spatial coverage and representation ofthe domain. Raw observations from these stations were obtained from the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), quality assured and were merged using the SMERGE pre-processor to create a single assimilated data file ofsurface observations for each year analyzed. FIGURE 3-3. PLOT OF SURFACE STATIONS

450
400 350

100
50 KPlIC

tl"c.ICiJ'TlK**OklahOrfl,~tLOK** Norman_OK KHIP.



# . Wichita MountainJ

- ''11 Lawton_OK j-:'2fl IIoTUL \iI' Tuls,.OK Sinclair Refinory KD.KO 

# • Hercules-Glildes
""flO

IIoT."(K



# .**O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~'~~~'~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~** 

### o 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 Lambert Conformal Conic (X) (km) 

## 3.2.3 UPPER AIR DATA 

### Upper air observations were not used in this CALMET analysis (i.e., NOOBS = 

### 1). 

## 3.2.4 PRECIPITATION DATA 

### The effects ofchemical transformations and deposition processes on ambient pollutant concentrations were considered in this analysis. Therefore, it was necessary to include observations ofprecipitation in the CALMET analysis. The precipitation stations from 3-5 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

### which Trinity extracted data are listed in Appendix B. The locations ofthe precipitation stations with respect to the modeling domain are shown in Figure 3-4. These stations were selected from the available data inventory to optimize spatial coverage and representation ofthe domain. Data from the stations were processed for use in CALMET using Version 5.31, Level 030528 ofEPA's PMERGE program.

FIGURE

### 3-4. PLOT OFPRECIPITATION STATIONS

... E' 500 

## I - - - m-:l!' - - - - ­ 450 Ct;ILfT 400 350 E <£.**~300** <> 

# 8 1lI 250 E •..11' 2 c: 8200 ;: il Wichita_Mountain-' $ •**'p'~'.oD** WAUl';)

### ~ 150 Lawt9n_OK ca":Creek ... ,,,,,hL I I
..... ArblAH wctlrr I

## n~"'"**"":l'n::'~"** 100 I I .'&'III • I fiH\m.a. UlLtMne:co CJ40fl I I 50 I w\", rEX).' LM\m EL**18~'~"** 

### o 

# --------------**.;o"'m.-;~** ii.I'T - - - - - - - - - - - - - J

...'ro.**-50~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uw~~** -50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 Lambert Conformal Conic (X) (km) 

## 3.3 CALMET PROCESSING CONTROL Table 3-1 provides a listing ofthe CALMET parameters that Trinity used in the Tulsa Refinery's modeling analysis. In addition to the parameters that were used for the Tulsa Refinery's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameter to be used is different than what CENRAP recommended, a short explanation as to the difference is proved. Note that most ofthe differences from CENRAP's recommended parameters are due to the inclusion ofobservation data into the modeling analysis, since CENRAP's parameters are based on a no-observation analysis. 

### - - - - -;,li',,­**~1l\EI\**

### iO~~II~:;
••d...



### 3-6 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

### TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY 

### OF CALMET INpUTS
CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes NUSTA Number ofupper air data sites 0 0 Only surface and precipitation observations were used NOWSTA Number ofoverwater data sites 0 0 IBYR Starting year 2001 Appropriate met year Years 2001, 2002, 2003 IBMO Starting month 1 Appropriate month Due to file size, analysis was completed by month IBHR Starting hour 1 1 IBTZ Base time zone 6 6 IRLG Length ofrun 8736 Varies with month Due to file size, analysis was completed by month IRTYPE Run type {l for CALPUFF) 1 1 LCALGRD Compute CALFRID data fields (T = run CALGRID) F F
ITEST Stop run after SETUP to do input QA (2 = run) 2 2
PMAP Map projection LCC LCC RLATO Latitude (decimal degrees) ofprojection origin 40N 33.25N Appropriate for domain RLONO Longitude (decimal degrees) ofprojection origin 97W 100.5W Appropriate for domain XLATl Latitude of 151 standard parallel 33N 33N Appropriate for domain XLAT2 Latitude of2nd standard parallel 45N 40N Appropriate for domain DATUM Datum region for output coordinates WGS-G WGS-G Selected datum to match datum of land use data NX Number ofX grid cells in meteorological grid 300 256 Appropriate for domain 

### 3-7 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMETVariable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes NY Number ofY grid cells in meteorological grid 192 155 Appropriate for domain DGRIDKM Grid spacing (km) 6.0 3.0 Refined grid spacing XORIGKM Ref. coordinate of SW comerofgrid cell -1008 0 Appropriate for domain YORIGKM Ref. coordinate of SW comer ofgrid cell 0.0 0 Appropriate for domain NZ Number ofvertical layers 10 10 ZFACE Vertical cell face heights (NZ 

### + 1 values) 0, 20, 40, 80, 160, 320,640,1200,2000, 3000,4000 0, 20, 40, 80, 160,320,640,

1200,2000, 3000,4000 LSAVE Save met. data fields in an unformatted file? T T
IFORMO Type ofunformatted output file (1 for CALPUFF) 1 1
LPRINT Print met. fields F F IPRINF Print intervals 1 1 IUVOUT(NZ) Specify layers ofu,v wind components to print NZ·O NZ·O IWOUT(NZ) Specify layers ofw wind component to print NZ·O NZ·O ITOUT(NZ) Specify layers of3D temperature field to print NZ·O NZ·O
LDB Print met data and variables F F NN1 First time step for debug datato be printed 1 1

NN2 Last time step for debug datato be printed 1 2 Generated debug data for a total of

### 2 time steps 3-8 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes IOUID Control variable for writing test/debug wind fields 0 0
NZPRN2 Number oflevels starting at surface to print 0 1 Default
IPRO Print interpolated wind components 0 0 IPRI Print terrain adjusted surface wind components 0 0
IPR2 Print initial divergence fields 0 0 IPR3 Print final wind speed and direction 0 0 IPR4 Print final divergence fields 0 0 IPR5 Print winds after kinematic effects 0 0 IPR6 Print winds after Froude number adjustment 0 0
IPR7 Print winds after slope flows are added 0 0 IPR8 Print final wind field components 0 0 NOOBS No observation mode (2 

### =No surface, overwater, or upper air observations; use MM5 for surface, overwater, and upper air data) 2 1 Used surface and precipitation observations only

NSSTA Number of meteorological stations in SURF.DAT file 0 47 Number ofstations

NPSTA 

# . Number of precipitation stations in PRECIP.DAT file 0 135 Number ofstations
ICLOUD Gridded cloud fields (0 

### =no, 3 

### =Gridded cloud cover from 3 3


### 3-9 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes prognostic relative humidity) IFORMS Format ofsurface data (2 

### = formatted) 2 2 IFORMP Format of precipitation data (2 

### = formatted) 2 2
IFORMC Format ofcloud data (2 

### = formatted) 2 1 N/A
- No cloud data used in model IWFCOD Generate winds by diagnostic wind module? (1 

### =yes) 1 1
IFRADJ Adjust winds using Froude number effects? (1 

### =yes) 1 1
IKINE Adjust winds using kinematic effects? (0 

### = no) 0 1 Computed kinematic effects in this analysis IOBR Use O'Brien procedure for vertical winds? (0 

### =no) 0 0
ISLOPE Compute slope flows? (1 

### = yes) 1 1 IEXTRP Extrapolate surface winds to upper layers (-1 

### = no extrapolation and ignore layer 1 of upper air station data) -1 -1

ICALM Extrapolate surface winds even ifcalm? (0 

### = no) 0 0
BIAS Layer dependent biases weighting aloft measurements 0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0, 0 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,0,0,0 RMIN2 Minimum vertical extrapolation distance Distance (km) around an upper air site where vertical extrapolation is excluded (set to -1 if IEXTRP 

### =± 4) -1 -1



### 3-10 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAPProtocol Value Trinity Used Notes IPROG Using prognostic or MM-FDDA data? (14
= Use winds from MM5.DAT as initial guess wind field) 14 14

ISTEPPG Timestep (hours) of theMM5 data 1 1 LVARY l(se varying radius of influence to develop surface winds? T T UseFLAG default
RMAX1 Maximum radius of influence over land in surface layer (Ian) 30 100 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study RMAX2 Maximum radius of influence over land aloft (Ian) 30 500 As included in IWAQM Phase 2 case study RMAX3 Maximum radius of influence over water (Ian) 50 36 Same as MM5 data spacing RMIN Minimum radius of influence used anywhere (Ian) 0.1 0.1
TERRAD Radius ofinfluence ofterrain features (km) 12 12
R1 Weighting offirst guess surface field (km) 1 50 As included in IWAQMPhase2 case study R2 Weighting offirst guess aloft field (km) 1 100
0 As included in IWAQMPhase 2 case study RPROG MM5 windfield weighting parameter (Ian) 0
DIVLIM Maximum acceptable divergence 5.E-6 5.E-6 NITER Max number of passes in divergence minimization 50 50
NSMMTH Number ofpasses through smoothing filter in each layer of CALMET(NZ 2,4,4,4,4,4,4 2,4,4,4,4,4, 4,4,4,4



### 3-11 SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description values) NITR2 Max number of stations used in each layer for the interpolation ofdata to a grid point (NZ values) CRITFN Critical Froude number ALPHA Kinematic effects parameter FEXTR2 Scaling factor for extrapolating surface winds aloft NBAR barriers IDIOTPI Compute temperature from observations (0

true) ISURFT Surface station to use for surface temperature (between 1 and NSSTA) IDIOPT2 Domain-averaged wind component switch IUPT Station for lapse rates (between 1 and NUSTA) ZUPT Depth through which lapse rate is calculated IDIOPT3 Domain averaged wind component switch IUPWND ion for ZUPWND Bottom andtop of layerthrough which the domain scale winds are computed IDIOPT4 Observed surface wind component Value Included in CENRAPProtocol 

### 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5

1.0 0.1 NZ*O.O
0 0
4

0
2


### 200

0
-1 1.,1000.

0 Value Trinity Used 

### 5, 5, 5,5,5,5, 5,5,5,5

1.0 0.1 NZ*O.O
0 0
4

0
2


### 200

0
-1 1., 1000.

0 Notes



### 3-12 SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes switch IDIOPT5 Observed aloft wind component switch 0 0 LLBREZE Use lake breeze module? F F NBOX Number oflake breeze regions 0 0 NLB Number ofstations in the region 0 0 METBXID(NLB) Station IDs in the region 0 0 CONSTB Neutral stability mixing height coeffiCient 1.41 1.41
CONSTE Convective stability mixing height coefficient 0.15 0.15
CONSTN Stable stability mixing height coefficient 2400 2400
CONSTW Overwater mixing height coefficient 0.16 0.16 FCORIOL Absolute value of Coriolis parameter I.E-4 I.E-4 IAVEZI Conduct spatial averaging? (1 

### = yes) 1 1 MNMDAV Max search radius in averaging process (number ofgrid cells) 10 10
HAFANG Half-angle ofupwind looking cone for averaging (degrees) 30 30
ILEVZI Layers ofwind use in upwind averaging (between 1 and NZ) 1 1
DPTMIN Minimum potential temperature lapse rate in the stable layer above the current convective mixing height 0.001 0.001

DZZI Depth oflayerabove current convective 200 200 

### 3-13 SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes mixing height through which lapse rate is computed (m) ZIMIN Minimum overland mixing height (m) 50 50 ZIMAX Maximum overland mixing height (m) 3000 3000 ZIMINW Minimum overwater mixing height (m) 50 50 ZIMAXW ITPROG Maximum overwater missing height (m) 3000 3000 3D temperature from observations or from MM5? 2 

### 1 Used surface observations and precipitation data IRAD Type ofinterpolation (1 = lIr) 

### 1 1 TRADKM Temperature interpolation radius ofinfluence (Ian) 36 36
NUMTS Max number of stations for temperature interpolations 5 5

IAVET Spatially average temperature? (1 = yes) 

### 1 1
TGDEFB Temperature gradient below the mixing height over water (KIm) -.0098 -0.0098

TGDEFA Temperature gradient above the mixing height over water (KIm) -.0045 -0.0045

JWATl Beginning land use categories over water 55 55
JWAT2 Ending land use categories for water 55 55
NFLAGP Precipitation interpolation flag (2 = 

### lIr) 2 2



### 3-14 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALMET Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes SIGMAP Radius ofinfluence for precipitation interpolation (km) 50 50
CUTP Minimum precipitation rate cut off(mmlhr) 0.01 0.01



### 3-15 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

## 4. CALPUFF Trinity conducted a three-year CALPUFF analysis. The CALPUFF model requires the input of meteorological data output by CALMET, source emissions data, receptor data, ozone and ammonia data, and model parameter settings. 

## 4.1 BART-ELIGIBLE SOURCES As a petroleum products refinery with a combined total ofmore than 250 MMBtulhr heat input and a PTE ofgreater than 250 tpy, the Tulsa Refinery is considered BART-eligible. In order to determine what specific units constitute the "BART-eligible" source, the construction dates ofeach ofthe station's units must be examined. A summary is provided below. TABLE 4-1. BOILER CONSTRUCTION DATE SUMMARY 

### Unit No. Name Construction Date 6156 Hydrotreater (N 

### Stack) 1972 6157 Hydrotreater (S Stack) 1972 6162 Reformer No.2
­ Splitter Reboiler & 

### Stabilizer Reboiler 1972 6163 Reformer No.2
­ Intermediate Heater 1 & 

### 2 1972 6152 SRU 1972 6154 Flare No.2 1972 CT-8 Cooling tower No.8 1972 

## 4.2 SOURCE EMISSIONS DATA Trinity included emissions ofS02, NOx , 

### and PMlO in the model. For refined analyses, CENRAP has suggested several emission data sources in the following priority:l

... Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM) data, for period 2001-03

... CEM data for 2002

... Actual 2002 emission rates in state emission inventories

... Emission factors from AP-42 source profiles

... Permit allowable emissions, or

... Potential to emit A detailed summary ofemission rates and source data is included in Appendix A. Table 4-2 provides a briefsummary ofthese emission rates. CEM data has previously not been required and therefore was unavailable for the period from 2001 -2003. Therefore, emissions were calculated using emissions factors that were based on either AP-42 emission factors or baghouse manufacturer emission data. Maximum production rates utilized in developing model emissions were based upon

I CENRAP BARTModeling Guidelines,p6-4. 

### 4-1 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

### those utilized in calculating the Sinclair Refinery's CY2002 emission inventory. Based upon reported annual hours ofoperation from 2001-2005, it is reasonable to assume that each ofthese units operated continuously over a single 24-hour period. As a result, emissions are calculated based upon a full 24 hours ofoperation. TABLE 

### 4-2. ESTIMATED

### 24-HOUR AVERAGE EMISSION RATES 

### Unit ID NOx 

### PMlO 

### S02 NH3 

### Ibslbr Ibslbr Ibslbr Ibslbr 

### 6156 39.31 2.04 8.25 

# -­ 6157 5.39 0.43 2.45 

## -­ 6162 34.80 1.51 7.80 

# -­ 6163 63.12 5.37 10.97 

# -­ 6152 

# -­ -­ 3.55 

# -­ 6154 55.35 

# -­ 299.22 2.13 CT-8 

# -­ 25.54 

## -­ 

# -­ 4.2.1 

### PM10 EMISSIONS 

### PM IO 

### emissions are not directly entered into the model but are instead input as its coarse and fine constituents. The PM10 

### emissions from the units are speciated according to the Federal Land Managers' guidance to include the following: 2



### ... Coarse particulate matter (PMC, considered PM2.5-10)

... Fine particulate matter (PMF, considered PM<2.5)

... Sulfates (S04)

... Secondary organic aerosols (SOA)

... Elemental carbon (EC) Based upon FLMguidance, PM iO 

### emissions from natural gas combustion consists ofprimarily coarse (25%) and fine (75%) particulate matter. PM emissions from cooling tower No.8 are larger than 30 microns, as stated in Permit No. 98-021-TV. As a result, all PM emissions from the cooling tower were expressed as PM(coarse). A summary ofspeciated PM iO 

### emissions is presented in Table 4-3.

2 hnp:llwww2.nature.nps.gov/air/Pennits/ect/ectGasFiredCT.cfm 

### 4-2 Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063TABLE 4-3. SPECIATED PMIO EMISSIONS 

### Unit ID PM (coarse) PM (fine) Ibslhr Ibs/hr 6156 0.58 1.73 6157 0.11 0.32 6162 0.38 1.13 6163 1.34 4.03 6152 

## -­ 

# -­ 6154 

# -­ 

# -­ CT-8 25.54 

# -­ 4.2.2 STACK PARAMETERS 

### Table 4-4 provides a summary ofsource parameters as listed inthe 2002 emissions inventory as provided by the Oklahoma DEQ. TABLE 4-4. POINT SOURCE STACK PARAMETERS 

### Emission Latitude Longitude Exit Stack Stack 

### Exit unit (degrees) (degrees) Velocity Height Diameter Temperature (ft/s) (feet) (feet) (Fahrenheit) 6156 i 36.113000 96.012083 8.32 140 4.8 520 6157 36.112888 96.012083 2.87 178 5 520 6162 36.113722 96.012138 6.19 124 4.5 500 6163 36.113694 96.011972 8.84 124 5.8 500 6152 36.112555 96.001805 4.82 200 2.0 340 6154 36.113555 95.995833 60.00 240 1.6 1,500 CT-8 36.123444 96.000250 21.11 50 36.3 105 

### Base elevation ofeach ofthe units is 192 meters (630 feet) above MSL based upon visual inspection ofUSGS topographic maps. 

## 4.3 RECEPTORLOCATIONS The National Park Service (NPS) has electronic files for each Class I area available on their website containingthe locations and elevations ofdiscrete Class I 

### area receptors. The receptor files for Caney Creek Wilderness, Hercules-Glades Wilderness, Upper Buffalo Wilderness, and Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge were downloaded from the NPS website, converted into the LCC NAD27 projection, and incorporated into the CALPUFF model. Receptor locations for these Class I 

### areas are shown in Figures 4-1 to 4-4.

4-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

### • • • ••• 

### • • • •



# • • 

# • • • • • • • 

# • • • • 

# • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • • • • 

# • 

# • 

# • • • • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • • • 

# • • • 

# • • • • FIGURE 4-1.WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS Wichita Mountains Wilderness wthin WLchjla Mountains NWR 59 Recepto," FWS Wid.rness Bo un dary Source,

Region2GIS 500 Gold Ave., SW P

### a Box 1306 Albuquerque, N M 67103 FWS NWR Boundarv Source:

http.llwww.fws.govldalalr2**gis~** ou ndary .hlm I Septem ber 18, 2003

FIGURE 4-2. CANEY CREEK WILDERt"iESS RECEPTOR LoCATIONS Cane y Creek Wilderness 80 Receptors USFS Boundary Source:

FS National Coverage file: NR IS - ALP roup Corvallis, 0 August 22,2003



### 4-4 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

# • • 

# • •
• 

# • • •
•
• • 

## • •
• 

## • 

# •
•
• 

## • • • 

# • • 

## • • • • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • • • 

## • • 

## • •
• • 

## • • 

## • • •
• FIGURE 4-3. HERCULES-GLADES WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS



### • 

## • • 

## • 

# • •

• HerOJles·Glades**W~dernes s**  80 R.",ptor. ' USFS Boundary Source.

FS Nallon;1 Coyerags file : NRIS · ....P group Corvallis ,OR**~gust** 22,2003 

### • 

## •

4-5 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 

### 063701.0063

# • 

# • • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • • • • • 

# • • 

# • • • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • 

# • 

# • •

• • • 

# • • 

# • 

# • • • •

FIGURE 

### 4-4. UPPER BUFFALO WILDERNESS RECEPTOR LOCATIONS Upper Buffalo Wilderness 72 Re ce ptors 

# • 

# • • • 

# • USFS Boundary Source: FS National Coverage file:

# ~ NRIS-ALPgroup Corvallis, OR August 22,2003



# • • • 

# • • • 

# · '------, ;----.----,



# •

4.4 BACKGROUND OZONE 

### Background ozone concentrations are required in order to model the photochemical conversion of**S~** 

### and NOx to sulfates (S04) and nitrates (N03). CALPUFF can use either a single background value representative ofan area or hourly ozone data from one or more ozone monitoring stations_ CENRAP recommends either developing background ozone estimates from ambient monitors located within the particular domain being modeled or developing background ozone estimates from CENRAP's most recent CMAQ or CAMx simulation for the 2002 base year. Since the data from CENRAP's CMAQ and CAMx simulations is not readily available, Trinity used 40 ppb as the
4-6 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### background value. This background concentration is the value included in CENRAP's protocol as a default background value for the CENRAP region. 

## 4.5 BACKGROUND AMMONIA Background ammonia concentrations are required to model the formation ofammonium sulfates and ammonium nitrates. CENRAP recommends developing background ammonia estimates from CENRAP's mostrecent CMAQ orCAMx simulation for the 2002 base year. Since 

### CMAQ/CAMx modeled and observed monthly averaged ammonia concentrations exhibit wide spatial variability, CENRAP recommends obtaining separate monthly-averaged ammonia concentrations from CMAQ or CAMxfor the CENRAP north, central and south modeling domains, respectively. These would then be used as input to CALPUFF. Since the data from CENRAP's CMAQ and CAMx simulations is not readily available, Trinity used a monthly background concentration of3 ppb. This background concentration is the value included in CENRAP'sprotocol as a default background value for the CENRAPregion. 

## 4.6 CALPUFF MODEL CONTROLPARAMETERS Table 4-5 provides a listing ofthe CALPUFF parameters that Trinity used in Sinclair's modeling analysis. In addition to the parameters that were used for Sinclair's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameter to beused is different than what CENRAPrecommended, a short explanation as to the difference is provided. 

### TABLE 4-5. SUMMARY OF 

### CALPUFF INpUTS CALPUFF ValueIncluded in

Variable Description CENRAPProtocol Value Trinity Notes METRUN All model periods 0 0 in met files will be run IBYR Starting year 2001 Appropriate met year Years 2001,2002, 2003 IBMO Starting month 1 1 IBDY Starting day 

### 1 1 IBHR ! 

### 1 1 XBTZ 6 6 = CST) IRLG Length ofrun 8760 8760 NSPEC Numberof 10 10 MESOPUFFII chemical species NSE Numberof 8 

### 5 Adjusted to fit chemical species emission profile of to be emitted facility ITEST Prop;ram is 2 2 

### 4-7 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes executed after SETUP phase MRESTART Do not read or write a restart file during run 

### 0 0
NRESPD File written only at last period 

### 0 0 "METFM CAL"MET binary file (CAL"MET."MET) 1 1
AVET Averaging time in minutes 

### 60 60 PGTIIv1E PG Averaging time in minutes 

### 60 60 MGAUSS Gaussian distribution used in nearfield 1 1
MCTADJ Partial plume path terrain adiustment 

### 3 3 MCTSG Sub-grid-scale complex terrain not modeled 

### 0 0
MSLUG Near-field puffs not modeled as elongated 

### 0 0
MTRANS Transitional plume rise modeled 1 1 MTIP Stacktip downwash used 1 1 MSHEAR (0, 1) Vertical wind shear (not modeled, modeled) 0 0

MSPLIT Puffs are not split 

### 0 1 Allowed for puff splitting due to significant sourcereceptor distances MCHEM "MESOPUFF II chemical parameterization scheme 1 1 I
MAQCHEM Aqueous phase transformation not 

### 0 0 

### 4-8 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes modeled MWET Wet removal modeled 1 1 MDRY Dry deposition modeled 1 1 MDISP PG dispersion coefficients 

### 3 3 MTURBVW Use both O"v and O"w from PROFILE.DATto compute O"y and O"z (n/a) 

### 3 3

MDISP2 PG dispersion coefficients 

### 3 3 MROUGH PG O"y and O"z not adjusted for roughness 0 0
MPARTL No partial plume penetration of elevated inversion 1 1
MTINV Strength of temperature inversion computed from default gradients 0 0

MPDF PDF not used for dispersion under convective conditions 0 0

MSGTIBL Sub-grid TIBL module not used for shoreline 0 0
MBCON Boundary concentration conditions not modeled 0 0

MFOG Do not configure for FOG model output 0 0
MREG Technical options must conform to USEPALong Range Transport 1 

### 1



### 4-9 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Value Included in Variable Description CENRAP Protocol (LRT) guidance CSPEC 

### CENRAP Output Group Species Modeled S02 804

PMF 1 EC 1 SOA 1 PMAP Map projection NX Number ofX grid cells in meteorological grid NY NumberofY grid cells in meteorological grid NZ Number ofvertical layers in meteorological 

### grid DGRIDKM Grid spacing (km) ZFACE Cell face heights in meteorological grid (m) XORIGKM Reference X coordinate for SW comerofgrid cell ofmeteorological grid (km) YORIGKM Reference Y coordinate for 8W comerofgrid cell ofmeteorological 

### Dry Emitted Deposition 1 1 2 1 1 0 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 UTM 66

66

10

6 0,20,40,80, 160, 320,640,1200,2000, 3000,4000 5

3327 Value Trinity Used Notes


### Sinclair
­ Tulsa Refinery Output Group Species Modeled S02 1 S04 

### 1 NOX 1 

### HN03 1 N03 

### 1 NH3 1 PMC 1 PMF 1 EC 1 SOA 1 LCC 256

155

10

3 0,20,40,80,160, 320,640, 1200, 2000,3000,4000 0

0 

### Dry Emitted Deposition 1

0 1 1 2 1 2 0 2 0 2 Based on refined grid parameters as specified in CALMETruns Based on refined grid parameters as specified in CALMETruns

Refined grid size
Appropriate for domain (refined grid)
Appropriate for domain (refined grid)



### 4-10 Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAPProtocol 

## , Notes grid (km) IUTMZN UTM zone of coordinates (NAD83) (Use only ifPMAP== UTM) 12 14 

### N/A,LCC coordinates used

IBCOMP X index oflower left comerofthe tational grid 1 35 Appropriate for domain (refined computational grid) JBCOMP Y index oflower left comerofthe computational 

## I grids 1 31 Appropriate for domain (refined computational grid) IECOMP X index ofupper right comer ofthe computational grid 66 243 Appropriate for domain (refined computationall'!:rid) JECOMP Y index ofupper right comer ofthe computational grid 66 155 Appropriate for domain (refined nal grid) LSAMP Sampling grid is not used F F IBSAMP X index oflower left comerof sampling grid 1 1
JBSAMP Y index oflower left comerof sampling grid 1 1
IESAMP X index ofupper right comerof sampling grid 66 256 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) JESAMP Y index ofupper right comerof sampling grid 66 155 Appropriate for domain (refined grid) MESHDN Nesting factor of sampling grid 1 1 ICON Output file CONC.DAT containing concentrations is created 1 1

IDRY Output file DFLX.DAT containing dry 1 1



### 4-11 SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes fluxes is created IWET Output file WFLX.DAT containing wet fluxes is created 1 I

IVIS Output file containing relative humidity data is created 1 1

LCOMPRS Perform data compression in output file T T
IMFLX Do not calculate mass fluzes across specific boundaries 0 0

IMBAL Mass balances for each species not reported hourly 0 0
ICPRT Print concentration fields to output list file 1 1
IDPRT Do not print dry flux fields to output list file 0 0
IWPRT Do not print wet flux fields to output list file 0 0 ICFRQ Concentration fields are printed to output list file every hour 1 1
IDFRQ Dry flux fields are printed to output list file every 1 hour 1 1
IWFRQ Wet flux fields are printed to output list file every 1 hour 1 1

IPRTU Units for line printer output are in 

### g/m3 for 3 3



### 4-12 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 

### 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description concentration and g/m% for deposition IMESG Messages tracking the progress ofrun written to screen LDEBUG Logical value for debug output IPFDEB First Duffto track NPFDEB Numberofpuffs I to track NNI Meteorological period to start output NN2 Meteorological period to end NHILL ofterrain NCTREC Number ofspecial complex terrain receptors MHILL Input terrain and receptor data for CTSG hills input in CTDM format XHILL2M Conversion factor for changing horizontal dimensions to meters ZHILL2M Conversion factor for changing vertical dimensions to meters XCTDMKM X origin ofCTDM system relative to CALPUFF coordinate system 

### (km) YCTDMKM Y origin ofCTDM system relative to Value Included in CENRAP Protocol

2
F I 1 1
10


### 0 0
2

1

1



### 0

0 Value Trinity Used

2
F 1 I I
10


### 0 0
2

1

1



### 0

0 Notes



### 4-13 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes CALPUFF coordinate system (km) S02 Diffusivity 0.1509 0.1509 Alpha star 1000 1000 Reactivity 8 8 Mesophyll resistance 0 0 Henry'sLaw coefficient 0.04 0.04 NOX Diffusivity 0.1656 0.1656 Alpha star 1 1 Reactivity 8 8 Mesophyll resistance 5 5 Henry'sLaw coefficient 3.5 3.5 HN03 Diffusivity 0.1628 0.1628 Alpha star 1 1 Reactivity 18 18 Mesophyll resistance 0 0 Henry's Law coefficient 8.0e-8 8.0e-8 S04-2 Geomatric mass mean diameter of S04-2 (!lm) 0.48 0.48
N03­ Geometric mass mean diameter of N03- (11m) 0.48 0.48
PMC Geometric mass mean diameter of PMC (11m) 6 6
PMF Geometric mass mean diameter of PMF (11m) 0.48 0.48
EC Geometric mass mean diameter of EC (11m) 0.48 0.48
SOA Geometric mass mean diameter of SOA (11m) 0.48 0.48



### 4-14 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes RCUTR Reference cuticle resistance (s/cm) 30 30 ROR Reference ground resistance (s/cm) 

### 10 10 REACTR Reference pollutant reactivity 

### 8 8 NINT Numberofparticle size intervals for effective particle deposition velocity 

### 9 9

IVEO Vegetation in nonirregated areas is active and unstressed 1 1

S02 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S"I) 3.21E-05

0 3.21£-05
Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S"I) 0

S04-2 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S"l) 1.0E-04 1.0E-04
Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (s·l) 3.0E-05 3.0E-05

HN03 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S'l) 6.0E-05 6.0E-05
Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·l) 0 0

N03­ Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S'l) 1.0E-04 1.0E-04
Scavenging 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 

### 4-15 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·l) NH3 Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·I) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·l) PMC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·l) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·l) PMF Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·I) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·l) EC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation 

### I (S·l)

Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·I) OC Scavenging coefficient for liquid precipitation (S·I) Scavenging coefficient for frozen precipitation (S·I)

# val~ CEN Value Trinity Used

8.0E-OS 8.0E-OS

0 0

1.OE-4 1.0E-4

3.0E-OS 3.0E-OS

1.OE-04 l.OE-04

3.0E-OS 3.0E-OS

1.OE-04 l.OE-04

3.0E-OS 3.0E-OS

1.0E-04 1.0E-04

3.0E-OS 3.0E-OS Notes



### 4-16 SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes MOZ Read ozone background concentrations from ozone.dat file (measured values) 1 0 Used monthly background ozone value
BCK03 Background ozone concentration (ppb) 12*40



### , 12*40
BCKNH3 Background ammonia concentration 

## I (ppb) 12*3 12*3

RNlTEl Nighttime N02 loss rate is %/hour 0.2 0.2 RNlTE2 Nighttime NOX loss rate is %/hour 2 2 RNlTE3 Nighttime RN03 loss rate is %/hour 2 2 MH202 Background H202 concentrations 1 0 Need to choose 0 in orderto use monthly background value BCKH202 Background monthly H202 concentrations 1 12*1
BCKPMF Fine particulate concentration for SOAoption (j.tg/m3) 1 1 Irrelevant, since MCHEM not equal to 4 OFRAC Organic fraction of fine particulate for SOA option .2 0.15,0.15,0.2,0.2,0.2, 0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2,0.2, 0.2,0.15 Irrelevant, since MCHEM not equal to 4 VCNX VOC/NOX ratio for SOA option 50 50 Irrelevant, since MCHEM not equal to 4 SYTDEP Horizontal size of a puffin meters beyond which the time dependant dispersion equation ofHeffter is used 550 550

MHFTSZ Do not use Heffter formulas for sigma 0 0 

### 4-17 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF alue Included in 

# I Variable 

### ,... ""'ENRAPProt 

### z JSUP Stability class used 

### 5 to detennine dispersion rates for puffs above boundary layer CONKI Vertical dispersion 

### 0.01 constant for stable conditions CONK2 Vertical dispersion 

### 0.1 constant for neutral/stable conditions TBD Use ISC transition 

### 0.5 point for detennining the transition point between the Schulman-Scire to Huber-Snyder Building Downwash scheme IURBI Lowerrange of 10 land use categories for which urban dispersion is assumed IURB2 Upper range of 

### 19 land use categories for which urban dispersion is assumed ILANDUIN Land use category 

## * for modeling XLAIIN

# oom~. ..**~.** ZOIN Roughness length in meters for modeling domain ELEVIN Elevation above sea level 

## * * 5



### 0.01
0.1

0.5

10



### 19



## * * * * Used Notes



### 4-18 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAPProtocol Value Trinity Used Notes XLATIN North latitude of station in degrees 

# - - XLONIN South latitude of station in degrees 

# - - ANEMHT Anemometer height in meters 

### 10 10 ISIGMAV Sigma-v is read for lateral turbulence data 

### 1 1
IMIXCTDM Predicted mixing heights are used 

### 0 0 XMXLEN Maximum length ofemitted slug in meteorological grid units 

### 1 I

XSAMLEN Maximum travel distance ofslug or puffin meteorological grid units during one sampling unit 

### 10 10

MXNEW Maximum number ofpuffs or slugs released from one source during one time step 

### 60 60

MXSAM Maximum number ofsampling steps during one time step for a puffor slug 

### 60 60

NCOUNT Number of iterations used when computing the transportwind for a sampling step that includes transitional plume rise 2 2

SYMIN Minimum sigmay in meters for a newpuffor slug 

### 1 1
SZMIN Minimum sigma z 

### 1 1 4-19 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes in meters for a new puffor slug SVMIN Minimum lateral turbulence velocities (m1s) 0.5 0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5, 0.5,0.37,0.37,0.37, 0.37,0.37,0.37 SWMIN Minimum vertical turbulence velocities (m1s) 0.20,0.12,0.08,0.06, 0.03,0.016 0.20, 0.12, 0.08, 0.06,0.03,0.016, 0.20,0.12,0.08, 0.06,0.03,0.016 WSCALM Minimum noncalm wind speeds (m1s) 0.5 0.5
XMAXZI Maximum mixing height (m) 3000 3000 XMINZI Minimum mixing height (m) 20 20 SL2PF Maxmium cry/puff . length 10 10 PLXO Wind speed power-law exponents 0.07,0.07,0.10,0.15, 0.35,0.55 0.07,0.07,0.10, 0.15,0.35,0.55 WSCAT Upperbounds of 1sl 5 wind speed classes 1.54,3.09,5.14,8.23, 10.80 1.54,3.09,5.14, 8.23,10.80 PGGO Potential temp gradients PG E & F (deg/km) 0.020, 0.035 0.020, 0.035
CDIV Divergence criterion for dw/dz (l/s) 0.01 0.01
PPC Plume path coefficients (only ifMCTADJ

### = 3) 0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5, 0.35,0.35 0.5,0.5,0.5,0.5, 0.35,0.35 NSPLIT Number ofpuffs when split 3 3 IRESPLIT Hours when puff is eligible to split 1900 Hour 17 Should be by hour of day
- 1900 is hour 17 ZISPLIT Previous hours minimum mixing height, m 100 100
ROLDMAX Previous max mixing height/current 0.25 0.25


### 4-20 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes height ratio, must beless than this value to allow puff to split NSPLITH Number ofpuffs resulting from a split 

### 5 5
SYSPLITH Minimum sigma-y ofpuffbefore it may split 1.0 1.0
SHSPLITH Minimum puff elongation rate from wind shear before puffmay split 2.0 2.0

CNSPLITH Minimum species concentration before a pluffmay split 1.OE-07 1.OE-07

EPSSLUG Criterion for SLUG sampling 1.OE-04 1.OE-04 EPSAREA Criterion for area source integration 1.OE-06 1.OE-06 DSRISE Trajectory step length for numerical site algorithm 1.0 1.0

NPTl Number ofpoint sources with constant stack parameters or variable emission rate scale factors Varies by scenario 7 Appropriate for Tulsa Refinery

IPTU Units for point source emission rates are g/s 1 3 Used different units (3 = lb/hr) NSPTl Number ofsourcespecies combinations with variable emissions scaling factors 

## - -

NPTI Number ofpoint sources with 

## - 

# - 4-21 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes variable emission parameters provided in external file MISC Otherpoint source inputs include stack height, stack diameter, exit temperature, exit velocity, downwash flag and emissions by species 

## - 

# -

NARI Number of polygon area sources Varies by scenario 0 None modeled
IARU Units for area source emission rates are g/m2/s I I
NSARI Number ofsource species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors 

# - -

NAR2 Number of buoyant polygon area sources with variable location and emission parameters 

# - -

NLN2 Number of buoyant line sources with variable location and emission parameters ' 

# - 0 None modeled

NLINES Number of buoyant line sources 

## - -
ILNU Units for line source emission rates in g/s 

# - -
NSLNI Number ofsource­ 

# - - 4-22 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Inc CENRAP Notes species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors MXNSEG Maximum number ofsegments used to model each line 

## . 

# -
NLRISE Number of distance at which transitional rise is computed 

## - 

# -

XL Average line source length (m) 

## - 

# - HBL Average height of line source height (m) 

## - 

# -
WBL Average building width (m) 

# - - WML Average line source width (m) 

# - - DXL Average separation between buildings (m) 

# - -

FPRIMEL Average buoyancy parameter (m4/s3) 

## - 

# - NVLl Numberofvolume sources 

# - - IVLU Units for volume source emission rates in grams/second 

## - 

# -

NSVLl Number ofsourcespecies combinations with variable emissions scaling factors 

## - 

# -

IGRDVL Gridded volume source data is not used 

## - 

# -
VEFFHT Effective height of emissions (m) 

## - 

# - VSIGYI Initial sigma-y 

# - - 4-23 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPUFF Variable Description Value Included in CENRAPProtocol Value Trinity Used Notes value VSIGZI Initial sigma-z value 

# - - NREC Numberofnongridded receptors 5630 291 Corresponds to nearby Class I areas Receptor files as provided by NPS

4-24 

### Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

## 5. CALPOST Trinity conducted a three-year CALPOST analysis to detennine the change in light extinction caused by the TulsaRefinery's BART-eligible sources when compared to a natural background. The CALPOST model requires the input ofconcentration data output by CALPUFF. 

## 5.1 LIGHTEXTINCTIONALGORITHM Trinity utilized EPA's currently approved algorithm for reconstructing light extinction (as opposed to the new equation for reconstructing light extinction recommended by the IMPROVE Steering Committee). The light extinction equation is provided below. 

### 3*f(RH)*[(NH4)2S04J 

## + 3*f(RH)*[NH4N03] 

## + 4*[OC] 

## + 1*[PMf 

# l bext 

## + O.6*[PMc ] 

## + lO*[EC] 

## + bRay 

### The algorithm was used to calculate the daily light extinction attributable to the Tulsa Refinery's BART-eligible sources and light extinction attributable to a natural background. The change in deciviews based on the source and background light extinctions was evaluated using the equation below. 

### l!. 

### dv = 

### 10

# *In bext, background 

## + bext, source

# 1 [ bext, background 

## 5.2 CALPOST PROCESSING METHOD Trinity used CALPOST Method 6, which calculates hourly light extinction impacts for the source and background using monthly average relative humidity adjustment factors. Trinity used monthly Class I 

### area-specific relative humidity adjustment factors based on the centroid ofthe Class I 

### area as included in Table A-3 ofEPA's 

### Guidance/orEstimatingNatural Visibility Conditions Under the RegionalHaze Program. The factors for the relevant Class I areas in the analysis are provided in Table 5-1. TABLE 5-1. MONTHLY HUMIDITY FACTORS

Class I Area -, 

### Jan 

### Feb Caney Creek 

### 3.4 3.1 Hercules-Glades 

### 3.2 2.9

Upper Buffalo 

### 3.3 3.0 WichitaMountains 

### 2.7 2.6 Mar 

### 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.4 Apr May Jun Jul Aug 

### 3.0 3.6 3.6 3.4 3.4 2.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.8 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 2.4 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.5 Sep 

### 3.6 3.4 3.6 2.9

5-1 SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063

## 5.3 NATURAL BACKGROUND Forthe Wichita Mountains, Trinity used default west natural background values. For all other Class I areas, default east natural background values were used. The annual average concentrations are included in Table 2-1 ofEPA's 

### Guidance/orEstimatingNatural Visibility Conditions Under the RegionalHaze Program and are provided in Table 5-2. TABLE 5-2. DEFAULT AVERAGE ANNUAL NATURAL BACKGROUND LEVELS
Component Average Annual Natural Background West(I.1Wm3) AverageAnnual Natural Background**East(I.1Wm~** Ammonium Sulfate 0.12 0.23 Ammonium Nitrate 0.10 0.10 Organic Carbon Mass 0.47 1.40

Elemental Carbon 0.02 0.02 Soil 0.50 0.50 Coarse Mass 3.0 3.0 

## 5.4 EVALUATING BART·EXEMPTION Trinity compared the high ofthe 2001 through 2003 daily Adv values outputby CALPOSTto a contribution threshold of0.5 Adv. Ifthe 98th 

### percentile Adv values (the 7th 

### highest value, 22nd 

### highest overthree years) outputbyCALPOST is less 0.5 Adv, then the source is exemptfrom BART requirements. Ifthe highest ofthe Adv values outputby CALPOST is greater than 0.5 Adv, then the source is considered subjectto BARTregulations and must start on a BART-determination process. 

## 5.5 SUMMARY OF CALPOST CONTROL PARAMETERS Table 5-3 provides a listing ofthe CALPOST parameters that Trinity used inthe TulsaRefinery's modeling analysis. In additionto the parameters used for the Tulsa Refinery's modeling, the table also lists CENRAP's recommended parameters for comparison. In cases where a parameterto be used is different than what CENRAP recommended, a short explanation as to the difference is provided. TABLE 5-3. SUMMARY OF CALPOST INPUTS

CALPOST

Variable Description Value Included in CENRAPProtocol Value Trinity Used Notes ISYR Starting year 2001 Appropriate met year Years 2001, 2002, 2003 ISMO Starting month I 1 1 ISDY Starting day 1 1



### 5-2 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes ISHR Starting hour 0 0 AIICALPUFF periods will be included NPER Number ofperiods to process 8760 8760 NREP Process every hour of data? 1 = yes 1 1 ASPEC Process species for visibility VISIB VISIB ILAYER Layer/deposition code; 1 for CALPUFF concentrations 1 1
A Scaling factor, slope 0 0 B Scaling factor, intercept 0 0 LBACK Add hourly background concentrations of fluxes? F F

LG Process gridded receptors? F F LD Process discrete receptors? T T LCT Process complex terrain receptors? F F LDRING Report receptor ring results? F F NDRECP Select all discrete receptors -1 Varies As appropriate for Class I area being analyzed IBGR1D X index ofLL comer ofreceptor grid -1 -1 JBGRID Y index ofLL comer ofreceptor grid -1 -1 IEGRID X index ofURcomer ofreceptor grid -1 I 

### -I JEGRID Y index ofURcomer ofreceptor grid 

### -I -I NGONOFF Numberofgridded receptorrows 0 0 NGXRECP Exclude specific gridded receptors, Yes =0 0 0



### 5-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063CALPOST Variable Description MaximumRH% used in particle growth curve Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes RHMAX 

### 95 95
LVS04 Compute light extinction for sulfate? T T LVN03 Compute light extinction for nitrate? T T LVOC Compute light extinction for organic carbon? T T
LVMPC Compute light extinction for coarse particles? T T
LVMPF Compute light extinction for fine particles? Compute light extinction for elemental carbon? T T
LVEC T T
LVBK Include background in extinction calculation? T T SPECPMC Coarse particulate species PMC PMC SPECPMF Fine particulate species PM10 PMF Notation difference EEPMC Extinction efficiency for coarse particulates 0.6 0.6 EEPMF Extinction efficiency for fine particles? 1.0 1.0 EEPMCBK Extinction efficiency for coarse part. Background 0.6 0.6
EES04 Extinction efficiency for ammonium sulfate 3.0 3.0 EEN03 Extinction efficiency for ammonium nitrate 3.0 3.0 EEOC Extinction efficiency for organic carbon 4.0 4.0 EESOIL Extinction efficiency for soil 1.0 1.0 EEEC Extinction efficiency for elemental carbon 10.0 10.0



### 5-4 SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CENRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes MVISBK Method 6 for background light extinction 6 6
BEXTBK Background extinction for MVISBK=1 12 Not Used Not necessary since MVISBK=6 RHFRAC % 

### ofparticles affected byRH 10 

### Not Used Not necessary since MVISBK=6 RHFAC Extinction coefficients for modeled and background hygroscopic species computed using EPA (2003) monthly RH adjustment factors Depends on Class I Area ForCaney Creek: 3.4,3.1,2.9,3.0, 3.6,3.6,3.4,3.4, 3.6,3.5,3.4,3.5 Hercules-Glades: 3.2,2.9,2.7,2.7, 3.3, 3.3, 3.3, 3.3, 3.4,3.1,3.1,3.3 UpperBuffalo: 3.3,3.0,2.7,2.8, 3.4,3.4,3.4,3.4, 3.6,3.3,3.2,3.3 Wichita Mountains: 2.7,2.6,2.4,2.4, 3.0,2.7,2.3,2.5, 2.9,2.6,2.7,2.8 0.23 As appropriate for Class I area

Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek BKS04 Background sulfate extinction coeff
- east 0.23

BKN03 Background nitrate extinction coeff
- east 0.10 0.10 • Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek BKPMC Background sulfate extinction coeff
- east 3.00 3.00 Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek BKSOC Background organic carbon extinction coeff- east 1.40 1.40 Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek BKSSOIL Background soil extinction coeff
- east 0.50 0.50 Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek

• 

### 5-5 SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPOST Variable Description Value Included in CEl\TRAP Protocol Value Trinity Used Notes BKSEC Background elemental carbon extinction coeff- east 0.02 0.02 Used for HerculesGlades, Upper Buffalo, and Caney Creek BKS04 Background sulfate extinction coeff
- west 0.12 0.12 Used for Wichita Mountains BKN03 Background nitrate extinction coeff-,west 0.10 0.10 Used for Wichita Mountains BKPMC Background sulfate extinction coeff
­ west 3.00 3.00 Used for Wichita Mountains BKSOC Background organic carbon extinction coeff-west 0.47 0.47 Used for Wichita Mountains BKSSOIL Background soil extinction coeff
­ west 0.50 0.50 Used for Wichita Mountains BKSEC Background elemental carbon extinction coeff-west 0.02 0.02 Used for Wichita Mountains BEXTRAY Extinction dueto Rayleigh scattering (l1Mm) 10.0 10.0
LDOC Print documentation I;",,,,,
..? 

### F F IPRTU Print output units for concentrations and for deposition 3 3 Units preference
LlHR Report 1hraveraging times F 

### F L3HR Report 3 hr averaging times 

### F F L24HR Report 24 hr averaging times T T LRUNL Report run-length averaging times 

### F F LT50 Top 50 table 

### F T Outputpreference LTOPN Top Ntable F F NTOP Number ofTop-N values at each receptor 4 4 ITOP Ranks ofTop-N values at each receptor 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 LEXCD Threshold exceedances counts F 

### F


### 5-6 Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063CALPOST Variable Description THRESHl Averaging time threshold for 1 hr averages THRESH3 Averaging time threshold for 3 hr averages THRESH24 Averaging time threshold for 24 hr averages THRESHN Averaging time threshold for NAVGhr averages NDAY Accumulation period, da s NCOUNT LECHO Echo option LTIME Time series option LPLT Plot file option LGRD Use grid format instead ofDATA format LDEBUG Output information for debugging? Value Included in CENRAP Protocol 

### wI wI
-1
-1


### 0 1 F F F F
F Value Trinity Used 

### wI
-1
-1
-1


### 0 1 F F F F
F Notes



## Sw7 SinclairTulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

## 6. MODEL RESULTS
A summary ofthe top 25 visibility-impairing days at each ofthe relevant Class I areas over the modeled 2001-03 period is summarized in Table 6-1 to 6-4 below. Shaded values indicate visibility impacts that exceed the 0.5 Lldv threshold for contribution to visibility impairment. As seen in these tables, the 98th 

### percentile values indicate that the TulsaRefinery's contribution to visibility impairment is below the 0.5 dv threshold at each ofthe neighboring Class I areas. These results indicate that the Tulsa Refinery therefore qualifies for exemption from BART. TABLE 6-1. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR CANEY CREEK 2001-03 Rank Impact (Adv) S04 N03 

### OC EC PMC PMF 0,108 43,65 55,08 0 0 0.64 0.63 

### 2 0,082 42.42 56,54 , __

0__ 0 0,39 0.66 

### 3 0.074 26,74 71.06 0 0 1,21 

### 4 0.074 34.48 0 0,91 0.51 

### Peak 24-hr Avera e

5 6 7 8 

### 9 10 11 

### 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 

### 19 

### 20 21 98th Percentile 

### 23 24 25 Modeled Visibility

0.074 0.074 0.054 0.051 0.051 0.05 0.046 0.045 0.043 0.042 0,04 0.039 0.038 0.037 0.036 0.034 0.032 0.032 0.032 0.031 0.029 

### Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Year Day

2001 2002 2001 2001 2003 24 38 289 4 363 46.34 52.13 0 0.69 0.84 _2003 79 36.64 62.36 0 0.54 9·4L.. 2002 340 0 0.36**,9-,-4:~L"** 2001 286



### ......,_..9.,-_
..._, 0 0.48 

### .",..9JL..."" _..1.90:t

__**~~** 7 37.37 61.74 0 0 0.49


### ..**_Q~---.** 2001.... 20



### . __!L.. 0 0.31 0.36 2003 3 0 0 0.02 ,0.01 2002 25 39.79 58.95 0 0.44 0.82 2002 263 27.11 70.68 0 0 1.34 0.88 2001 8 24.77 73,39 0 0 0.91 0.93 2003 353

67.06 32.51 0 0 0.12

.**'~"~'~_""ff"_'~'** 50.78 48.36 0 0 0.29 16.29 81.52 0 1.08 73.79 0 0 0.5 0 1.19 0 1.75 1.25 2002 14 0 0.79 0.55 2001 231 0 0.65 1.07 2003 332



### 6-1 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### TABLE 6-2. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR HERCULES GLADES 2001-03



### Peak 24-hr Ave 2 0.066 

### 3 0.061**~----** ..-­ 4 0.058 

### 5 0.048 

### 6 0.046 

### 7 0.046 

### 8 9 11 0.035 

### 12 13 14 

### 15 16 17 0.024 

### 18 0.022 

### 19 0.021 

### 20 21 0.021 

### 98th Percentile 0.021 

### 23 0.021 

### 24 0.02 

### 25 0.019 38.4 61.01 87.97 11.24 0 0 30.07 68.6 0 0 63.83 35.58 0 0 49.1 49.75 0 0 24.18 0 0**~.------.** 0

48.02 48.39 0 0 40.67 0 0 73.65 _0_ 0 51.09 0 0 82.55 0 0 35.5 

### .__..2..

__. 0 56.88 42.34 0

47.85 51.48 0 0

___.N_.

___. 40.76 57.82 

### -_9._­ 0 0 0 4.41 0 0 77.34 0 0 16.4 0 0 0.25 0.54 0.16 0.4 0.13

1.1 0.22 1.05 0.16 0.55 0.09 0.23

0.18 0.74 0.08 0.61 1.89 0.54 2001 22 0.55 2003 256 0.79 2002 12 0.43 2001 60 0.75 2003 82 0.36 2002 262

6 340

..-?.49_ 2003 296

0.54 2001 314 0.77 2001 335 0.34 2002 340 1.43 2002 47 0.35 2002 30 0.55 2001 11 362 146 

### Rank Modeled Background Extinction by Species 

### (%) Year Day Visibility Impact (Adv) S04 N03 

### OC EC PMC PMF

10



### 6-2 Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063TABLE

### 6-3. VISIBILITY IMPACT MODEL RESULTS FOR UPPERBUFFALO 

### 2001-03 Rank Modeled Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Year Day Visibility Impact (Adv) S04 N03 

### OC EC PMC PMF Peak 24-hr Average 0,119 63.7 35.83 0 0 0.11 0,36 2002 30 2 0,114 39.82 59.49 0 0 0.25 0,44 2001 22 

### 3 0,061 37.56 61.68 0 0 0,13 0,63 2001 6 

### 4 0,057 25,18 71,57 0 0 2.36 0.9 2001 362 

### 5 0.047 36.99 61.9 0 0 0.46 0.66 2001 4 6 0.046 40.31 58.77 0 0 0.27 0.66 2002 332 7 0.045 62.05 37.48 0 0 0.13 0.34 2003 343 

### 8 0.041 28,3 70.46 0 0 0,53 0.71 2001 32 9 0.04 87.14 11.84 0 0 0,42 0.61 2001 138 

### 10 0.04 44.25 55.02 0 0 0.35 0.38 2002 340 11 0.039 73.97 25.63 0 0 0.1 0.3 2001 285 12 0.035 17.44 80.43 0 0 0.99 1.14 2001 361 13 0.035 77.33 21.68 0 0 0.48 0.52 2001 239 

### 14 0.034 76,49 22.76 0 0 0.26 0.48 2003 256 

### 15 0.033 7.43 90.67 0 0 0.27 1.63 2001 287 16 0,032 69.94 26.98 0 0 1.19 1.9 2001 238 17 0.032 36.95 62.4 0 0 0.13 0.52 2001 21 

### 18 0.032 39.81 59.21 0 0 0,36 0.63 2002 361 19 0.031 24.52 74.09 0 0 0.67 0.72 2002 348 

### 20 0.03 94.93 3.97 0 0 0.56 0.55 2003 229 21 0.029 45.09 53.94 0 0 0.16 0.81 2001 340 

### 98th Percentile 0.029 52.9 46.56 0 0 0.17 0.38 2002 360 

### 23 0,029 33,02 65.61 0 0 0.61 0.75 2002 317 

### 24 0.028 58.88 40.18**----~-,---,** 0 0.25 0.71 2001 315 

### 25 0.028 30.81 68.96 0 0 0.1 0.13 2002 25



### 6-3 Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063--- TABLE 6-4. VISIBILITY L\fPACT MODELRESULTS FORWICHITA MOUNTAINS 

### 2001-03 Background Extinction by Species (%) 

### Modeled Year Day Visibility Impact**(~dv)** 

### Rank S04 N03 

### OC EC PMC PMF 

### Peak 24-hr Avera ge 0.11 28.75 69.93 0 0 0.55 0.76 2001 2 

### 2 0.09 69.69 29.63 0 0 0.2 0.48 2001 309 

### 3 _·

__• ... __K'

__**~'_** ... • ... _____• .. _ .. _· __ 79.51 19.52 0 0 0.47 0.5 

### 4 .................._ 0.081

........................__.... ,.._._-_.,.....

### _­

0.076 35.95 61.59 0 0 1.51 0.95

# r:~ 5 0.075 48.82 49.53 0 0 0.82 0.84 2003 145 

### 6 

### ..____O.O€!!L __ 23.3 75.03 0 0 0.64 1.03 2002 306 

### 7 0.067 82.79 16.46 0 0 0.32 0.42 2002 149
".. "........**~---.-,~-** ...

## - ... 8 0.062



## ­ 51.29 47.5 0 0 0.47 0.73 2001 308 

### 9 0.059 50.88 48.2 0 0 0.3 0.62 2002 300

..**-~-.-** 

### 10 0.059 50.24 49.32 0 0 0.19 0.25 2003 59 11
_ 2003

__**._~** 

### 12 27.09 71.33 0 0 0.48 1.1 38.38 59.24 0 0 1.31 1.08 2003

___......_ ......__

275

..___..... . __.m._.._. ... l3 2001 __ 160_ 78.34 19.65 0 0 1.05 0.95 

# §

2003



## __11L 15 14 0.048 65.24 32.99 0 0 0.76 1.01 22.41 73.95 0 0 1,67 1.97 0.043 2.QQL_._l68
__ 

### 16 0.043 19.78 76.76 0 0 1.95 1.52

__?.9QL_.._ .•

### 1.!L.. 17 0.042 30.36 66.02 0 0 1.26 2.36 .2002 266 18 ....,.........._",.........

# _. 58.44 40.98 0 ' 0 0.12 0.45 0.04 2003 60



## - 19 0.04 29.8 69.04 0 0 0,35 0.81 2003 6

- 

### 20 0.034 67.55 31,71 0 0 0.42 0.32 2002 156 

### 21 0.034 67.19 31.93 0 0 0.32 0.57 2003 243 

### 98th Percentile .............

### "-,--"-,,

..

# _,_..---_.,,, 0.033 93.38 4,52 0 0 0.75 1.34 2001 223 

### 23 0.033 44.55 53.91 0 0 0.66 0.88 2002 357 

### 24 0,033 24.2 74.28 0 0 0.58 0.94 2003 57 

### 25 n •••• 0,033 18.64 80.08 0 0 0.66 0.63 2003 51



### 6-4 

### SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063

### ApPENDIXA - EMISSION DATA

Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063Printed 121112006

Source Emissions Emission Input Values Point ID

6156 6157 6162 6163 6152 6154 CT-8 Point Name Hydrotreater (N Stack) Hydrotreater (S Stack) Reformer No 2 - SplitterReboiler Reformer No 2 Intermediate Heater I & 2 SulfurRecovery Unit (SRU) Flares No I & No 2 Cooling Tower No.8 Htr S02 Ibslhr 8.25 2.45 7.80 10.97 3.55 299.22



## -­ N01 lbslhr 39.31 5.39 34.80 63.12



# -­ 55.35



# -­ PM (coarse) Ibs/hr 0.58 0.11 0.38 1.34



# -­



# -­ 25.54 PM (fine) Ibslhr

1.73 0.32 1.l3 4.03



# -­

-­

-­ NH3 lbslhr



# -­



# -­

-­

-­

-­ 2.15



# -­ Total 332.24
.. -197.98 27.94 7.21 2.15
Stackparameters (English) Point ID Stack Flow ExitVelocity StackHeight Stack Dia. StackTemp. Base Elev.2 ACFM ft/sec feet feet Fahrenheit (feet) 6156 Hydrotreater (N Stack) 36,147 8.32 140 4.8 520 630 6157 Hydrotreater (S Stack) 13,510 2.87 178 5 520 630 6162 ReformerNo 2 - SplitterReboiIer 23,634 6.19 124 4.5 500 630 6163 Reformer No 2 Intermediate Heater I & 2 Chrge Htr 56,044 8.84 124 5.8 500 630 6152 SulfurRecovery Unit (SRU) 3,631 4.82 200 2.0 340 630 6154 I<1aresNo I &N023 

## -­ 60.00 240 1.6 1,500 630 CT-8 Cooling Tower No.8 

# -­ 21.11 50 36.3 lOS 630 Stackparameters (Metric) Point ID Exit Velocity Stack Height StackDia. StackTemp Base Elev. (m/s) (m) (m) Kelvin (meters) 6156 Hydrotreatcr (N Stack) 2.54 42.68 1.46 544 192 6157 Hydrotrcater (S Stack) 0.87 54.27 1.52 544 192 6162 Reformer No 2 - Splitter Reboiler 1.89 37.80 1.37 533 192 6163 Reformer No 2 Intermediate Heater I & 2 Chrge Htr 2.69 37.80 1.77 533 192 6152 Sulfur Recovery Unit (SRU) 1.47 60.98 0.61 444 192 6154 Flares No 1 & No2 18.29 73.17 0.49 1,089 192 CT-8 Cooling Tower No. 

## t 6.44 15.24 11.07 314 192 Stack parameters obtained from 2002 emission inventory summary as providedby Oklahoma DEQ. 2 Base elevations obtained from visual inspection ofUSGS topographic maps

Flare exit velocity based on control device requirements as established in 40 CFR 60.18. 4 Cooling tower emissions are conservatively characterized as emitted from a single. representative cell Sinclair Refining BART Modeling Modeling Input Data Page I of5 Trinity Consultants 063701.0063Printed 121112006

Source Emissions Emission Factors'''' SOl·,4 Point ID Unit Description Constr. Date lIeatDuty ExhaustFlowrate Hours ofOperati NOx PM 10 (MMBtulhr) (hrs/day) (lb/MMBtu) (acfm) (lhIMMBtu) (lb/MMBtu) 4,458E-02 6156 Stripper Reboiler (120 MMBtlllhr) 1972 120 36,147 0,275 0,007 24 rractionatorReboiler (65 MMBtu/hr) 0,098 0,007 6156 1972 36,147 24 4.458E-02 65 0,007 Reactor Charge (55 MMBtlllhr) 24 4.458E-02 6157 1972 55 13,510 0.098 6162 Splitter Reboiler (100 MMBtulhr) 1972 100 23,634 0,275 4.458E-02 24 0.007 6162 StabilizerReboiler (75 MMBtulhr) 1972 75 23,634 0.007 4.458E-02 24 0.098 CRUCharge (120MMBlulhr) 6163 1972 120 56,044 24 0.275 0.007 4.458E-02 6163 Intermediate 1 (101 MMBtulhr) 56,044 4.458E-02 1972 101 24 0.275 0.007 Intermediate 2 (25 MMBtulhr) 56,044 6163 1972 25 24 0.098 0.007 4.458E-02 Emission factors based onAP-42 (7/98) Table 1.4-1 and 1.4-2. IblMMSCF converted to IblMMBtu using a natural gas heating value of 1020 BtulSCF 3 S02 emissions based upon a refinery fuel gas sulfur content (volume basis) 0.027% and a standard molarvolume of 380 SCFllbmol Sample Calculati(m: I MMBtu • SCF fuel gas 0.00027 SCF sulfur Ilbmol S02 64lbS02 = 4.46E-02 Ib S02 1020 Btu SCF fuel gas 1Ibmol sulfur Ibmol MMBtu
SourceEmissions Emission Data Inpue PointlD Unit Description SOl S04 NO. PM 10 PM,"a,.. PMfi•• EC SOA (lb/hr) 6156 Stripper Reboiler (120 MMBtulhr) 5.350 32.941 Ll54 0.289 0.866 

## -­ 

# -­ 6156 Fraclionator Reboiler (65 MMBtulhr) 2.898 6.373 1.154 0.289 0,866 

# -­ -­ 6157 Reactor Charge (55 MMBtulhr) 2.452 5.392 0.431 0.108 0.324 

# -­ -­ 6162 Splitter Reboiler (100 MMBtulhr) 4,458 27.451 0.755 0.189 0,566 

# -­ -­ 6162 StabilizerReboiler (75 MMBtulhr) 3.344 

# -­ 7.353 0.755 0.189 0.566 

# -­ -­ 6163 CRUCharge (J20 MMBtulhr) 5.350 

# -­ 32.941 1.790 0.447 1.342 

## -­ 

# -­ 6163 Intermediate 1 (101 MMBtulhr) 4,503 27.725 1.790 0.447 1.342 

# -­ -­ 6163 Intermediate 2 (25 MMBtlllhr) 1.115 2.451 1.790 0.447 1.342 

# -­ -­ 3 Condensible/filterable PM speciation were based on the following profiles: ForNatural Gas, National Park Service guidance for NG-fired combustion turbines, http://V1'WW2.nature.nps.gov/airlPermits/ect/ectGasFiredCT.cfm PM 1().25 (filterable) 25% PM (coarse) PM25 (condensible) 75% PM (fine)

Sinclair Refining Combustion Sources Trinity Consultants BART Modeling Page2of5 063701.0063Printed 121112006



### SourceEmissions Unit Description Point lD Constr. Date 

### S02 (Iblhr) Scrubbed tailgas exhausts 

### 6152 1972 3.55 Parameter Value 

## I Units Notes Sulfur recoverv unit (SRUl 

### 19 (long tons sulfur/day) SRU Inlet Rate TGTU Efficiency 99.9% 1 

### TGTU Exhaust Rate 0.019 (long tons sulfur/day)

SulfurMW 32 Ib/lbmol .

-­ 

### S02MW 64 Ib/lbmol long ton 2240 Ibs TGTU Exhaust Rate 85.12 (Ib S02/day) 3.55 (Ib SOihr)
J 

### Approximately equal to NSPS-required control efficiency Sample Calculation: 

### 0.019 long tons sulfur 2240lbs Ibmol 64lb S02 85.l21b S02 day long ton 321bs S Ibmol day

SinclairRefining SRU Trinity Consultants BARTModeling Page 3 of5 063701.0063Printed 121112006
Crude Input Emissions Emission Factors

Point ID Unit Description Constr. Date Throughput' Througbput Hours ofOperation NOx S02 (bbls/yr) (bbls/day) (hrs/day) (Iblkbbls) (Iblkbblsl 6154 ZinklSTF-SA-36-C 1972 24,982,781 68,446 24 18.9 26.9 Based on 2002 annual throughput 2 Emission factors based on AP-42 (1/95) Table 5.1.1. SourWater StripperEmissions

SWSFeedS

(gpm) 107.80 (Iblbrper 2.94 blbr) 16.93 S02 (Ib.mol HzS/hr) 3.47 (Ib/br) 222.50 Emissions NH/ (Iblbr) 2.15 3Based on 0.5 wt"10 conversion to NOx 4 Per John Zinc·Jim Franklin· 98% NH3 destruction 5 SWS Feed and offgas flow based on reported rates for 2002.**~** ......... _ .....**.,~** ;V.IJ •• VH Compound Mol Frac (%) MW (Ibllb.mol) Moles (Ib.mol) Mass (Ib) Mass Frac (%) NH3 H2S H2O 42.5% 23.4% 34.1% 17.03 3407 18.01 0.425 0.234 0.341 7.238 7.972 6.141 0.339 0.373 0.288 Total 100.0% 

## -­ 1.000 21.352 Note: weight fractions calculated assuming basis of I mol inlet feed. Offgas MW = 21.352 Ibllb.mol

SourceEmissions Emissions PointlD Unit Description S02 NO. NH/ (Iblbr) 6154 ZinklS1FSA-36-C Crude Input 76.72 53.90 

## .. Sour Water Stripper 222.50 1.45 2.15 Total 299.22 55.35 2.15

Sinclair Refining Flare Trinity Consultants BART Modeling Page 4 of5 063701.0063Printed 121112006

SourceEmissions 

### Emission**Factors~** 

### •

Point ID Unit Description Constr. Date Water Flow Rate! (kgpm) Hours ofOperation (hrs/day) PM10 

### (Iblkgal) • 

### CT-8 Cooling water for the OIF 

### 1972 22.4 24 0.019 I 

### Based on 2002 emissions inventory 2 

### Emission factors based on AP-42 (1/95) 

### Table 13.4-1. SourceEmissions 

### Emission Data Inpue

PointID Unit Description PM.oar•• 

### Oblhr) CT-8 Coolingwater for the OIF 

### 25.536 3 

### PM emissions are larger than 30 microns, as stated in Permit No. 98-021-TV, EUG 19.

Sinclair Refining Cooling Towers Trinity Consultants ·BARTModeling Page 5 of5 063701.0063

### ApPENDIX

## B - DATA FILE LIST

LIST OF SURFACE STATIONS
Station No. Longitude Station ID Location (official ID) Latitude (deg.) (deg.) 724502 

### KW1.P.._."_...._ ..._,,._Winfu;ld/Ark. £jtv. KS

___.___,,___--'-"""-"'=--

__

### "_"_,,_,,J,,lJ§§...._,,_.__ ,,97.033**~.Y..Q** 

### __.,,_.______Bart1esville. OK 723565 .''

____''_)6.7.9L

___''__ ,,96.017 723604**K~..12L.** ___**""C"-'h"'ild"'-re"'s""s.""TX~**__________**~""""'____** .._

### ____34.431__ ,,100.283 724519**K~fY** 

### __.,,_..,,___.,,_Coffeyville MunicioaLKS""

_____._,,____=-'-"-'-"

__.. ""
___ JLlQQ,,
..__,,_ ,,95.567**K~J.:l1l..** 

### __."..,,__.,,__ChanutelMartin John. KS 13986 

### ._...".

____lH§L.._."_.".,, -95.483 !<.SS¥

____. ___Clinton-Sherman. OK 723526 35.333 -99.200 722589 

### KP...TQ,,_.,,_.

______""'D""en"'t""on""'.""TX=-

___________.....!.:.=""-

__

### ._"._.,,_.31·200 "._ -97.183 93992**~"!:P..,,._** 

### .._ ...._

..._

.._

El Dorado/Goodwin. AR

_______.._,,___**~~** __

### ._"._._.."J1,;m_."_...,,...._ -92.817**~.!'ill** __________Vance AFBlEnid. OK 723535 ._._____).§JJL,,___ -97.917 

### KE39 ShermanlDennison. TX 722673 . __.,,___)llE
______ -96.667 

### KEPIL"."
..._.__"._.IT!;,.c!t;.rick. OK 22222


### ------­..**------"'~=----** .." ........._ ..._.14J.Il_ ..."_...._,, -98.983 

### KEkP_"._."._". .Fliooin. AR 55555

______).§JOO -92.467**KE~..M...** 

### __. _____..Fort Smith. AR 13964 35.JJL___ -94.367 93993 

### KE.Y.Y.."_
......._,,._..._ ...**..FaY!<nevill.~.LP..[~e.** AlL

____________**~""'_='---_** ...""."..._)_(LQQQ.,,_,,_._. -94.167 13975 !<..QA9..._".

______""'G""al!"'e" ..**-"'O""'K~** ___".

___,,___. _____'_""'_'_''--_

### "._."

___1./iJQQ.,,.

___.,,__ -99.767 93986 

### [Q.mJ3.

_______**~H""ob""a""'rt""'.**O""K"'-

___________**~"""'-** __ 

### ____l.5.00Q
______ -99.050 

### IKH.QL"._.".

__._....**J.:I..QL~Qrinl!s.** AR......:.._.

__________-'--_.........!...=£:!C!."-

__ 723415 

### ...._"._."

__)_H21.,,.______ -93.083 13971 

## I!iliRQ_..."_.."_.._ ..."Harrili,,,,onIB,,,,,",,,,,,o,,o,,,,n,,,,e,,,,C,,,-o,,,, .. '-'A.!.!Rc

___. ______**""""'-".<..!....O~** __._

### ..._.,,_...lQ,.6J1

__..._.,,__ -93.117**IK!h_~**

## ___.._____McConnell AFB. KS 3923

____1.LQ.!l
____ -97.267 3928 

### K!.c;;:I__,,_._____-"W'-"ic"'h,""'ita"'"-"K"'S

________,,__. ____**--=~<__** __

### . ___**"_"J_"ZJ.1~,,L** 

### ___ -97.433 723495 

### !.Q.!"1::!"..." ...."

..".

__" ..".,,LQ.Q).ill_Rel!ional. MQ

______________=-'='--_**_._"""._"n"!~_Q_** 

### ..",,._.,,_ -94.500**K1~.YI**__. Lawton. OK 99999 . _____.34.567_____ -98.417 

### !K1!!1.---.-­ Liberal. KS 11111 . _____..d7.Oll
______ -100.950 13963 

### !K11I...... ,,_._ ......**1ittl!;,.g.Qckl~s!.~_.LA_l3,** _____. ____. __. __

### --"=.=
__".._ ..._

..._),,:tnl._._._ -92.233 

### IK1RL.,,

__. ____ Little Rock AFB. AR 723405 . _______1.4·917 -92.150 

## IKMKQ
________ Muskol!eelDavis Field. OK 11112

____l2..65Q_ -95.367**~_I,.<;:_** 

### ..._.".

___. __McAlester Rel!ionaL OK 93950 ",,___,,_)-42QQ_.___ -95.783**IKMw~.** 

## __..,,___Mena International Mun.. AR 723435 . _______**)_4c~2L."_,,** -94.217**!KPK~** 

### _______Oklahoma City. OK 13967 

### . _____l.5AOO
____ -97.600 

### !K9Jlli.

__. ____Norman-Westheimer. OK 723570 

### ...._".

__**,,_]1.c~l.** 

### _____ -97.450 

### lKr.f1_..._"_..,,_.,,__,, Medicine Lodl!e. KS 724520

____...__**1.L~"l"** .._____." -98.550**~~~** __. __**"~P~o=nc=a~C=itv~.~O=K~** _________**~~** __,,._,,__ 13969 _).§lJ3 -97.100 iK,P.....PL_.,,
______Parsonsffri City. KS 745431 . ____.3nlL
___ -95.517 

## lKr.RX..." ...."

..**"._"._"._~§LCox** FielQ., TX

_________._,,____

### --=-==-__ 33333 

### ._..._ ..._

..._)l.§JL..___..._ -95.450 1KR,.Q.9...

___.___ ROl!ers. AR 66666

_____.3.§J2.7 ___ -94.100 KSGF Sorinclield. MO 13995 37.233 -93.383 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063,------,..

### ,-,­**tK~!e~L_** 

### .._ ..**~iloam_Soring,** AR 

## --­ 77777**--~--,--,-"'-,-,-'"**

____ 36J8l
___ -94483 !K.SPS ____ WichitaFalls. TX 13966 33.983 -98.517 IK.SV(Q..___ Stillwater. OK 11113 _36.150 ___ -97.083 

### fKlliIi.......__..._Fort"Leonard Wood. M9 724457 .....]1]5Q......__ .. -92.150 tK"TIK Tinker AFB. OK 723540**3~.417** -97.383 

### tKJKI McKinnev.. TX 722541 

### 31183 -96.583 

### fKJU..L

__... TulsaInt Airoort OK 13968 36.200 -95.883 tK"TXK Texarkana Rel!ionaL TX 13977

___**;13.4~_** -94.000 OCVBT**~** AR 88888 36.350 -94.217 tK"WDG ___ EnidIWoodrine.. OK 44444



### ___12.38

### 1____ -97.783 OCADM Ardmore MunicioaL OK 723555 34.300 -97.017



### LIST OF PRECIPITATION STATIONS Cooperative Latitude Longitude station ID Location/name State (dea.) (dee.)**~0130** ALUM FORK AR 34.480 -92.510**~0178** ANTOINE AR 34.020 -93.250**~0220** ARKADELPHIA 2 N AR 34.090 -93.030**~0458** BATESVILLELIVESTOCK AR 35.500 -91.460**~0530** BEEBE AR 35.040 -91.540**~0616** BERRYVILLE 5 NW AR 36.260 -93.370**~0764** BLAKELY MOUNTAIN DAM AR 34.340 -93.120**~0798** BLUE MOUNTAIN DAM AR 35.070 -93390**~OS32** BOONEVILLE 3 SSE AR 35.060 -93.550**~OS42** BOTKINBURG 3 NE AR 35.430 -92.2S0**~0900** BRIGGSVILLE AR 34.560 -93.300**~1020** BULL SHOALS DAM AR 36.220 -92.340**~1140** CALIONL&D AR 33.ISO -92.290**~1l52** CAMDEN 1 AR 33360 -92.490**~J457** CLARKSVILLE 6 NE AR 35.320 -93.240**~15S2** COMPTON AR 36.050 -93.1SO**~1952** DE QUEEN DAM AR 34.060 -94.220**~2020** DIERKS DAM AR 34.090 -94.050**~214S** DUMAS AR 33.530 -91.290**~2300** ELDORADO GOODWIN FD AR 33.130 -92.490**~2356** EUREKA SPRINGS 3 WNW AR 36.250 -93.470**~2444** FAYEITEVILLEEXP STN AR 36.060 -94.100**~24S9** FERNDALE6E AR 34.460 -92.270**~2544** FOREMAN AR 33.430 -94.230**~2574** FORTSMITH MO, OK AR 35.200 -94.220 

### SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063**~2794** GILBERT AR 35.590 -92.430**~2810** GILLHAM AR 34.120 -94.150**~2978** GREERS FERRY DAM AR 35.310 -92.000**~3132** HARDY AR 36.170 -9\.280**~3165** HARRISON FAA AP AR 36.160 -93.090**~3544** HUNTSVILLE 1SSW AR 36.040 -93.450**~4185** LEWISVILLE AR 33.220 -93.340**~4248** NORTH LITTLE ROCKfMUNICIPAL AR 34.500 -92.160**~4756** MENA AR 34.340 -94.160**~4839** MILLWOOD DAM AR 33.410 -93.590**~4988** MOUNT IDA 3 SE AR 34.320 -93.350**~511O** NARROWS DAM AR 34.090 -93.430**~5112** NASHVILLE AR 33.560 -93.510**~5200** NIMROD DAM AR 34.570 -93.100**~5228** NORFORK'DAM AR 36.150 -92.150**~5320** NORTH LITTLE ROCKfMUNICIPAL AR 34.500 -92.160**~5602** PARTHENON AR 35.570 -93.150**~5754** PINEBLUFF AR 34.140 -92.010**~5908** PRESCOTT AR 33.480 -93.230**~6393** STPAUL AR 35.490 -93.460**~6920** STUTIGART 9 ESE AR 34.280 -91.250**~7488** WALDRON AR 34.540 -94.060 141427 CHANUTE M JOHNSON AP KS 37.400 -95.290 141699 COLBY 1 SW KS 39.240 -101.040 142164 DODGE CITY MU, KS KS 37.460 -99.580 142432 ELKHART KS 37.000 -101.530 142980 GARDEN CITY EXP STN KS 38.000 -100.490 143954 INDEPENDENCE KS 37.140 -95.420 143984 lOLA 1 W KS 37.550 -95.260 145175 MEDICINE LODGE KS 37.170 -98.330 147922 SUBLETTE KS 37.290 -100.500 148830 WICHITAKS. KS 37.390 -97.260 230789 BOLIVAR MO 37.370 -93.230 232302 DORA MO 36.470 -92.140 134315 JOPLIN MUNICIPAL AP MO 37.090 -94.300 234544 KIRKSVILLE MO 40.120 -92.340 234825 LEBANON2W MO 37.410 -92.420 234919 LICKING4N MO 37.330 -91.530 235027 LOCKWOOD MO 37.230 -93.570 235307 MARSHFIELD MO 37.200 -92.550 235594 MILLER 1 E MO 37.130 -93.500 236460 OZARK BEACH MO 36.400 -93.080 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063**~37435** ST JOSEPH ROSECRANS MO 39.470 -94.550**~37506** SALEM MO 37.380 -91.320 1237656 SENECA MO 36.510 -94.360**~37967** SPRING CITY MO 36.590 -94.320 1237976 SPRINGFIELDIMUN. MO. MO 37.140 -93.230 1238082 STOCKTON DAM MO 37.420 -93.460**~38252** TABLE ROCK DAM MO 36360 -93.180**~38880** WEST PLAINS MO 36.450 -91.500**~40179** ALTUS IRIG RES STN OK 34.350 -99.200**~40292** ARDMORE OK 34.100 -97.080**~40548** BARTLESVILLE PHILLIP OK 36.450 -96.000**~40670** BENGAL OK 34.510 -95.050**~40908** BOISE CITY 2 E OK 36.440 -102.290**~41437** CANEY OK 34.140 -96.130**~41750** CHICKASHA EXP STN OK 35.030 -97.550**~42654** DUNCAN AIRPORT OK 34.290 '-97.580**~42849** ELK CITY OK 35.230 -99.240**~43407** GAGE AIRPORT OK 36.180 -99.460**~43497** GEARY OK 35.380 -98.190 343740 GREAT SALT PLAINS OK 36.450 -98.080 344204 HOBARTMUNICIPAL AP OK 34.350 -99.020 344978 LAKE OVERHOLSER OK 35.290 -97.400 345108 LEHIGH OK 34.280 -96.130 345589 MARSHALL OK 36.090 -97.370 345664 MCALESTER MUNI AP OK 34.530 -95.470 346130 MUSKOGEE OK 35.460 -95.200 346485 NOWATA OK 36.420 -95.380 346616 OILTON 2 SE OK 36.040 -96.340 346638 OKEMAH OK 35.260 -96.180 346661 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK OK 35.230 -97.360 346944 PAWNEE5N OK 36.240 -96.490 347201 PONCA CITY MUNI AP OK 36.440 -97.060 347412 RANGE OK 36.330 -101.050 347660 RIVERSIDE 4 W OK 36.470 -100.250 348101 SHATTUCK 1 N OK 36.170 -99.530 348501 STILLWATER 2 W OK 36.070 -97.060 348992 TULSAIINTL OK. OK 36.120 -95.530 349404 WAYNOKA OK 36320 -98.530 349629 WICHITA MTNWL REF OK 34.440 -98.430

10016 ABILENEMUN, TX TX 32.250 -99.410 10211 AMARILLOIINTL. TX TX 35.130 -101.420 11698 CHILDRESS MUNI AP TX 34.260 -100.170 

### Sinclair Tulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063411773 CLARKSVILLE I W TX 33.370 -95.010 11921 COMMERCE TX 33.120 -95.560 11956 CONROE TX 30.200 -95.290 12242 DALLAS-FORT WORTHIFORT. TX. TX 32.540 -97.010 12244 DALLAS LOVE FIELD TX 32.510 -96.510 12404 DENTON 2 SE TX 33.120 -97.060 13284 FORT WORTH MEACHAM F TX 32.490 -97.210 13285 FORTWORTH WSFO TX 32.500 -97.180**~13370** FRISCO TX 33.090 -96.490**~13691** GRAPEVINE DAM TX 32.570 -97.030**~14098** HEREFORD TX 34.490 -102.240 1414375 HUNT lOW TX 30.030 -99.310 1414517 JACKSBORO TX 33.140 -98.090 1415193 LEXINGTON TX 30.250 -97.010 1415411 LUBBOCK/LUBBOCK INTL TX. TX 33.390 -101.490 1415897 MIDLOTHIAN 2 TX 32.290 -97.000 1415958 MINERAL WELLS MUN AP TX 32.470 -98.040 1416108 MOUNT PLEASANT TX 33.100 -95.000 1416177 NACOGDOCHES TX 31.370 -94.390 1416776 PAMPA 2 TX 35.340 -100.580**~17074** PLAINS TX 33.110 -102.500**~18623** STEPHENVILLE I N TX 32.150 -98.120**~18743** SULPHUR SPRINGS TX 33.090 -95.380**~18942** TEXARKANA TX 33.250 -94.050 1419532 WEATHERFORD TX 32.450 -97.460 1419729 WICHITA FALLS/SHEPS AFB TX TX 33.590 -98.300



### Sinclair TulsaRefining Company Trinity Consultants TulsaRefinery 063701.0063List of USGS Terrain Flies (i-deg format)

37 36 3S 34 33 Dooge City-E Pratl-W Pratt-E Wicl1!ta-W Wichita-E Joplin-W Joplin-E Springfield-W Springfield-E Rolla-W Perryton-E Woodward-W Woodward-Ii Enid-W Enid-E Tulsa-W Tulsa-E Harrison*W lIarrison-B Poplar Bluff-W Plainview-E Clinton-W Clinton-E Oklahoma City-W Oklahoma City-E FortSmith-W FortSmith-E Russ.lIville-W Russellville-E Memphis-W Amarillo-E Lawton-W Lawton-E Ardmore-W Ardmore-E Me**Alester~W** Me Alesler-E Little Rock-W Little Rock-E Helena-W Lubbock-E Wichita Fa\Is-W WichitaF olls-E Sherman-W Sherman-E Texarkana-W Texarkana-E EI Dorado-W EIDorado-E Greenwood-W 10] ]00 99 98 97 96 9S 94 93 92

# -- List of USGS Land Use Land Cover (LULC) Files (1 :250,000 km Format)

38.5 37.5 36.5 35.5 34.5 Dodge City Pratt Wichita Joplin Springfield Rolla ,Perryton Woodward Enid Tulsa Harrison Poplar Bluff
Plainview Clinton OklahomaCity Fort Smith Russellville, Conway, FJygap Mountain, Mountain View Memphis
Amarillo Lawton Ardmore Mc Alester, Antlers, DeQueen, Mena LittleRock Helena
Lubbock Wichita Falls Sherman Texarkana EI Dorado Greenwood 102 100 98 

### 96 94 92

### ApPENDIX 

## C - MODEL INPUT/OUTPUT FILES

SinclairTulsa Refining Company Trinity Consultants Tulsa Refinery 063701.0063