alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

I, Andre' DiMino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of ADM Tronics
Unlimited, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  Juky 14, 2006                    /s/ Andre' DiMino
                                            Andre' DiMino
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has
been provided to ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and will be retained by
ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Dale B. Smith,certify that:

1.                I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mueller Water Products, Inc.;

2.                Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          [Reserved]

(c)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: February 3,2006

|        | /s/ DALE B.  SMITH                                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Dale B. Smith  Title: Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
#### Edna J. STAMFORD, Delphine Scutieri, James Worm, Judy Worm, June Cost, Thomas Stamford, Bernice Stamford, and Hazel Swing, Appellants, v. SUNRISE POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Appellee.

No. 86-410.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 31, 1987.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1987.

David A. Freedman, Miami, for appellants.

*340Becker, Poliakoff & Streitfeld and Edward S. Polk, Fort Lauderdale, for appel-lee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *51 Island Way Condominium Association, Inc. v. Williams,*458 So.2d 364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); *State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Hall,*409 So.2d 193 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *Dolphin Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Del Bene,*388 So.2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, William Scott Marshall, President and a director of Cascade Energy, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Cascade Energy, Inc. for the three month period ended May 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cascade Energy, Inc.

Date: March 10, 2006

/s/ William Scott Marshall                        

William Scott Marshall

President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### GLOUCESTER ENGINEERING, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, Appellant, v. Eric MENDOZA and Grizella Mendoza, his wife, Appellees.

No. 86-364.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 27, 1986.

*142Peters, Pickle, Flynn & Niemoeller and Jeffrey A. Mowers, Miami, for appellant.

Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Since strict compliance with the substituted service statute is required, the order denying the motion to dismiss and to quash service of process is reversed for failure of the plaintiff to timely file the affidavit of compliance with the statute governing substituted service upon nonresidents. § 48.-161(1), Fla.Stat. (1985); *Smith v. Import Birds, Inc.,*461 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); *Shiffman v. Stumpff,*445 So.2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). This holding is without prejudice to the plaintiffs procuring alias process and attempting proper service thereof.

Reversed.
[No. 35478-7-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Karleen M. Hall, *Respondent,*and Donald E. Hall, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 89-3-08542-2, Michael C. Hayden, J., entered September 19, 1994. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Agid, J., concurred in by Webster and Ellington, JJ.
#### STATE ex rel. Elvis BROOKS v. Judge Frank J. SHEA.

No. 86-KH-0980.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Brooks, Elvis; applying for writ of Mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 261-032.

Denied.
```

[Federal Register: May 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 91)]
[Notices]               
[Page 26837]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12my10-130]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6999]

 
Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation Notice 
of Meeting

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation 
will meet on June 7 and June 8, 2010 at the Department of State, 2201 
``C'' Street NW., Washington, DC.
    Prior notification and a valid government-issued photo ID (such as 
driver's license, passport, U.S. government or military ID) are 
required for entrance into the building. Members of the public planning 
to attend must notify Margaret Morrissey, Office of the Historian (202-
663-3529) no later than June 3, 2010, to provide date of birth, valid 
government-issued photo identification number and type (such as 
driver's license number/state, passport number/country, or US 
government ID number/agency or military ID number/branch), and relevant 
telephone numbers. If you cannot provide one of the specified forms of 
ID, please consult with Margaret Morrissey for acceptable alternative 
forms of picture identification. In addition, any requests for 
reasonable accommodation should be made no later than June 1, 2010. 
Requests for reasonable accommodation received after that time will be 
considered, but might be impossible to fulfill.
    The Committee will meet in open session from 1:30 p.m. through 2:30 
p.m. on Monday, June 7, 2010, in the Department of State, 2201 ``C'' 
Street NW., Washington, DC, in Conference Room 1205, to discuss 
declassification and transfer of Department of State records to the 
National Archives and Records Administration and the status of the 
Foreign Relations series. The remainder of the Committee's sessions 
from 2:45 p.m. until 5 p.m. on Monday, June 7, 2010 and 9 a.m. until 12 
p.m. on Tuesday, June 8, 2010, will be closed in accordance with 
Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463). 
The agenda calls for discussions of agency declassification decisions 
concerning the Foreign Relations series and other declassification 
issues. These are matters properly classified and not subject to public 
disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and the public interest requires 
that such activities be withheld from disclosure. Questions concerning 
the meeting should be directed to Ambassador Edward Brynn, Executive 
Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, 
Department of State, Office of the Historian, Washington, DC 20520, 
telephone (202) 663-1123, (e-mail history@state.gov).

    Dated: April 29, 2010.
Ambassador Edward Brynn,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-11328 Filed 5-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P
```
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of BG Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Don Waddell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   |   | T. Don Waddell          |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   | May 22, 2006            |   |

 

21
----

| 1. | The      quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Grande Communications Holdings, Inc. for      the three months ended March 31, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grande      Communications Holdings, Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                                                                              |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                                              |
| Date:      May 9, 2008 | /s/    ROY H.      CHESTNUTT                                  |
|                   | Roy      H. Chestnutt                                                             |
|                   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of    Directors |

|                   |                                               |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                               |
| Date:      May 9, 2008 | /s/    MICHAEL L.      WILFLEY |
|                   | Michael      L. Wilfley                            |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer                       |

----
David M. Jackson

Request for amendments to FAA 333 UAS exemption 

Exemption No. 13765

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4067

Contact: 

David M.Jackson

495 Middle Rd. 

Steep Falls, ME 

04085

207-650-6301
Date: December,31 2015

Re:Exemption No. 13765

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-4067

To whom it may concern:

David M. Jackson is requesting an amendment to the existing 333 exemption as listed and 

described below. The purpose for the amendment is to be able to offer the services as listed in the 

existing 333 exemption. The amendment will better serve to increase the functionality and 

usefulness of additional UASs and the increased functionality will serve to create safer working 

environments in the industries in which they are deployed. 

1. Additional Aircraft

David M. Jackson would like to add additional UASs to the existing exemption No.13765. The new 

crafts are DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, DJI Inspire 1, and also the DJI S1000. 

Manufacturer: DJI

The addition of the DJI UASs listed would not effect the existing 333, where public interest and 

safety were the basis for granting the original exemption. The DJI Phantom 3, Inspire 1 and S1000 

meet all the existing requirements noted by the FAA. 

The user manuals will be emailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, the
undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Stanley P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

              A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



                                                     /S/ ALLEN S. GREENE
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Allen S. Greene
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

                                                     /S/ STANLEY P. WIRTHEIM
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                         Stanley P. Wirtheim
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


August 7, 2007
#### J. C. PRATT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. M-79-699.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 4, 1982.

Rehearing Denied April 9,1982.

*269Loren McCurtain, McAlester, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Michael Scott Fern, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BRETT, Presiding Judge:

The appellant was convicted for Keeping a Disorderly House pursuant to 21 O.S.1971, § 1026, in the District Court of Pittsburg County, Case No. M-79-463. He was sentenced to six (6) months’ imprisonment and a five hundred dollar ($500.00) fine.

The sole proposition asserted on appeal claims that the statute upon which the appellant was convicted is unconstitutionally vague. 21 O.S.1971, § 1026 provides:

> Every person who keeps any disorderly house or any house of public resort by which the peace, comfort, or decency of the immediate neighborhood is habitually disturbed, is guilty of a misdemeanor.

The appellant contends that the terms “peace, comfort or decency” are subject to multiple definitions and render the statute unconstitutionally vague and totally incomprehensible to a person of ordinary intelligence.

A criminal statute is void only when it is so vague that men of common *270intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning. See *State v. Madden,*562 P.2d 1177 (Okl.Cr.1979). Further, a criminal statute requires only reasonable certainty and the prohibited act may be characterized by a general term without the aid of definition, if that term has a settled and commonly understood meaning which doesn’t leave a person of ordinary intelligence in doubt. This is true even though the definition of the term contains an element of degree whereby reasonable men may differ. *Synnott v. State,*515 P.2d 1154 (Okl.Cr.1973). When we apply the foregoing standard to the statute in question, we are of the opinion that the statute is not so vague as to be violative of due process.

In *Isaah*v. *State,*24 Okl.Cr. 174, 216 P. 950 (1923) a “disorderly house” was defined as “[a] house in which people abide and disturb the order and tranquility of the neighborhood.”

In the case at bar, witnesses testified that as neighbors, they were subjected to or confronted with loud and raucous music, public drunkenness, urination in public, fist fights, shouting of obscenities and automobile racing.

It cannot be said that these activities, emanating from or associated with the occupants or guests of the appellant’s residence did not in fact breach or disturb the peace or tranquility of the neighborhood as contemplated by 21 O.S.1971, § 1026 or that a person of ordinary intelligence would not know in advance that these activities are prohibited.

It is therefore the opinion of this Court that the judgment and sentence should be affirmed.

BUSSEY, J., concurs.

CORNISH, J., not participating.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Albert DONSEREAU.

No. 86-CK-2421.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. C-6015; Parish of Orleans, Orleans Parish Juvenile Court, Div. “A”, No. 194-333.

Denied.

MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., would grant the writ. '
Final Notes July 9, 2010 

### Steam Study Data Review Notes BOD Standard Method 5210B (1992) (5-day Test)

1. If reported, indicate how samples are checked and treated for chlorine (5210B/4e).

2. If reported, indicate if the pH wa s adjusted prior to analysis. It is suggested that the pH of samples be between 6.5 – 7.5 S.U. (5210B/4e).

3. If reported, indicate if hydrogen peroxide is present in the samples and if relevant indicate how the lab treated th e samples for hydrogen peroxide.

4. If reported, indicate the temperature that sample s were equilibrated to prior to analysis. It is suggested samples be equilibrated to 20°C.

5. If reported, indicate the incubator or water ba th temperature. It is suggested that the temperature be maintained between 19 and 21°C during the entire analysis. (5210B/2b)

6. If reported, indicate if it was n ecessary for samples to be seeded and state the material used to seed the samples. Note: the seed correction should be calculated based on average seed control sample results (5210B/4d).

7. The DO uptake of seeded dilution water shou ld be between 0.6 - 1.0 mg/L (5210B/4d). If reported, indicate if the above criteria were met.

8. *If the analyte concentration in a sample wa s less than 5 times the analyte concentration in the laboratory reagent blank (if reported 1 ), report the result as a nondetect. List any affected samples:

9. *If the analyte concentration in a sample wa s less than 10 times but greater than 5 times the analyte concentration in the la boratory reagent blank (if reported 1 ), report the result as an estimated value. List any affected samples:

1 Note: It is optional for the laboratory to analyze a laboratory reagent blank.