alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### INTERMOUNTAIN SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GORE VALLEY/BIG HORN WATER DISTRICTS, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 82CA0470.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Oct. 28, 1982.

Herbert A. Shatz, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

Calkins, Kramer, Grimshaw & Harring, Edward J. Blieszner, James S. Bailey, Denver, for defendants-appellees.

*873COYTE, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing with prejudice his law suit for lack of standing to bring the action. We affirm.

Plaintiff was an unsuccessful bidder on a water treatment project proposed by defendants. Plaintiff filed suit for damages alleging in essence that it was the lowest bidder and that defendants acted negligently and unlawfully in awarding the contract to a contractor whose bid was higher than that of plaintiff. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings on the grounds that plaintiff lacked standing to bring the action and dismissed the action with prejudice.

The power of defendant to award the contract in question is governed by § 32-1-1001(l)(d), C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.), which provides that a special district may reject any and all bids.

The issue of standing to challenge the award of a public contract was addressed in *Colorado Paving Co. v. Murphy,*78 F. 28 (8th Cir.1897), where a contractor brought suit to restrain the City and County of Denver from giving a paving contract to other than the lowest bidder, contrary to the City Charter. The court there stated:

> “[T]he lowest bidder cannot compel the issue of a writ of mandamus to force the officers of a municipality to enter into a contract with him.... And the courts hold that he cannot maintain an action at law for damages for their refusal to enter into the contract.”

The rationale for this rule is that the underlying purpose of such statutes is to protect property holders and taxpayers. The advantage to be derived by individual bidders is merely incidental. Thus, statutes such as the one at issue here which govern the award of public contracts create a cause of action to challenge the propriety of an award only in taxpayers and property owners within the geographic limits of the contracting governmental body and not in the unsuccessful bidder. *Colorado Paving Co. v. Murphy, supra;*10 *E. McQuillin, Municipal Corporations*§ 29.86 (3rd ed.).

As stated in *Wimberly v. Ettenberg,*194 Colo. 163, 570 P.2d 535 (1977):

> “When standing is in issue, the broad question is whether the plaintiff has stated a claim for relief which should be entertained in the context of a trial on the merits. If a person suffers no injury in fact, or suffers injury in fact, but not from the violation of a legal right, no relief can be afforded, and the case should be dismissed for lack of standing.”

Judgment affirmed.

PIERCE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 305

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony to present

a gold medal on behalf of Congress to former President Ronald Reagan

and his wife Nancy Reagan.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 2002

Mr. GIBBONS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a

ceremony to present a gold medal on behalf of Congress

to former President Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy

Reagan.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on May 15, 2002, for a ceremony to present

4 a gold medal on behalf of Congress to former President

5 Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy Reagan. Physical

6 preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in ac-
2

•HCON 305 IH

1 cordance with such conditions as the Architect of the Cap2 itol may prescribe.

Æ
Order issued September

## 2.4:>, 2012

In The 

## <!rnurt nf l\ppeals lf.ifth, 1ilistrict nf Qrexas at 1ilallas No. 05-12-00057-CR 

### No. 05-12-00058-CR 

### LARRY EUGENE FINNEY, Appellant 

# v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

## ORDER 

## 004209

On August 22, 2012, this Court notified appellant that his briefwas overdue. To date, the Court has not received appellant's brief. We 

### ORDERRiann C. Moore, Dallas CountyPublic Defender's Office, to file appellant's briefwithin

### FIFTEEN DAYS from the date ofthis order. Ifthe briefis not filed within the specified time period, we may remove

# Ms. Moore as appointed counsel for appellant and order the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant on appeal.

# LAN~~~ JUSTICE
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Arthur G. BRODSKY, Respondent.

No. 69208.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 9, 1987.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Paul A. Gross, Bar Counsel, Miami, for complainant.

Arthur G. Brodsky, Vancouver, Wash., in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of a referee’s report filed pursuant to rule 3-7.6(c)(6) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction of attorney discipline proceedings. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar filed a formal complaint charging respondent with violation of the former Florida Bar Integration Rule and Code of Professional Responsibility, based on his conviction of a felony in United States District Court. A referee was appointed. Respondent submitted a guilty plea for a consent judgment. The consent judgment signed by respondent provides for disbarment without leave to reapply for a period of five years, with the time period funning from August 13, 1985, the date of respondent’s conviction of the criminal offense in federal court. The consent judgment was approved by a designated reviewer representing the Board of Goyernors of The Florida Bar.

Accepting the respondent’s plea, the referee found that respondent was adjudicated guilty of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of Title 18, United States Code, section 371. The referee found respondent guilty of violating Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law) as well as the Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.02(3)(a) (commission of an act contrary to honesty, justice and good morals) and Rule 11.02(3)(b) (commission of a crime). Consistent with the consent judgment plea submitted by respondent and approved by the Bar, the referee recommended disbarment without permission to apply for readmission for a period of five years, with the period running from August 13, 1985.

Neither party seeks review of the referee’s report. We therefore approve the findings and recommendations of the referee. Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, rule 3-7.6(c)(6). Arthur G. Brodsky is hereby disbarred, effective immediately.

Costs are assessed against the respondent. Judgment is entered against Arthur G. Brodsky in the amount of $150.00, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 192 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 192

    Extending birthday greetings and best wishes to Jimmy Carter in 
                   recognition of his 75th birthday.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 1999

  Mr. Cleland (for himself and Mr. Coverdell) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Extending birthday greetings and best wishes to Jimmy Carter in 
                   recognition of his 75th birthday.

Whereas October 1, 1999, is the 75th birthday of James Earl (Jimmy) Carter;
Whereas Jimmy Carter has served his country with distinction in the United 
        States Navy, and as a Georgia State Senator, the Governor of Georgia, 
        and the President of the United States;
Whereas Jimmy Carter has continued his service to the people of the United 
        States and the world since leaving the Presidency by resolutely 
        championing adequate housing, democratic elections, human rights, and 
        international peace;
Whereas in all of these endeavors, Jimmy Carter has been fully and ably assisted 
        by his wife, Rosalynn; and
Whereas Jimmy Carter serves as a living international symbol of American 
        integrity and compassion: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) extends its birthday greetings and best wishes to Jimmy 
        Carter; and
            (2) directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
        enrolled copy of this resolution to Jimmy Carter.
                                 <all>
```
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 123

Calling for the immediate release of all political prisoners in Cuba, including

Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. ANDREWS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Calling for the immediate release of all political prisoners

in Cuba, including Dr. Oscar Elias Biscet, and for other

purposes.

Whereas the Cuban Government found Dr. Oscar Elias

Biscet, a 39-year-old Afro-Cuban physician and human

rights activist, guilty of ‘‘dishonoring the symbols of the

fatherland’’ and sentenced him to 3 years in a Cuban

prison merely because he placed the Cuban flag upside

down as an international symbol of distress;

Whereas as documented by Amnesty International, Dr. Oscar

Elias Biscet has joined the ranks of thousands of political

prisoners being held in Cuba’s abysmal prisons;

Whereas some of these prisoners are being held merely for

expressing their frustration with the Cuban Government’s
2

•HCON 123 IH

refusal to provide better health care and improve prison

conditions;

Whereas in 1999, the Cuban Government adopted the Law

for the Protection of National Independence and the

Economy of Cuba, also known as ‘‘Law Number 88’’ or

the ‘‘Gag Law’’;

Whereas under this law Cubans face up to 5 years in prison

for the harmless act of writing a letter that describes

food shortages and up to 20 years in prison for supporting the United States embargo of Cuba;

Whereas the Cuban Government uses its food rationing system to promote tyranny and control the Cuban populace;

Whereas in cases in which the Cuban Government is unable

to establish grounds for long prison terms for political

dissidents, these dissidents are continually harassed, detained for short periods of time, subject to their phones

being tapped, and otherwise under constant surveillance;

Whereas foreign dignitaries are seldom allowed by the Cuban

Government to meet with Cuban political dissidents; and

Whereas Cuban dictator Fidel Castro continues to deny that

the Cuban Government holds any political prisoners:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that the em4 bargo of Cuba should not be lifted until the Cuban

5 Government agrees to decriminalize free speech, as6 sociation, and movement, and other elements crucial
3

•HCON 123 IH

1 to the development of democracy and the protection

2 of fundamental human rights; and

3 (2) the Congress calls on the Cuban

4 Government—

5 (A) to immediately release all political pris6 oners in Cuba, including Dr. Oscar Elias

7 Biscet;

8 (B) to eliminate all of Cuba’s criminal laws

9 that unnecessarily restrict the fundamental

10 human rights to freedom of speech, association,

11 and movement; and

12 (C) to respect fundamental human rights

13 and free multiparty and internationally super14 vised elections in Cuba.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Scrap China Corporation and
subsidiaries, (the “Company”) on 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard
Ivanovick Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








February
      4, 2010
            /s/
      Richard R IvanovickRichard
      R Ivanovick, CAChief
      Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Carey G. Birmingham, Chief Financial Officer of College Oak Investments,
Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2005 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

(2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of College
Oak Investments, Inc.

Dated: August 15, 2005

                                                /s/ Carey G. Bimingham
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Carey G. Birmingham
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TOMMY ADAMS, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. (4:18-cr-00520-RBH-1)

Submitted: February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Adams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Adams, Jr., appeals the district court’s text order denying his second motion 

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), denying his motion for 

reconsideration of the denial of his first compassionate release motion, and denying his 

motion to appoint counsel. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Adams’ informal brief does not challenge 

the bases for the district court’s dispositions, he has forfeited appellate review of the district 

court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal 

brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues 

preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 261

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States should support

the establishment of a Palestinian state in the Middle East.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 5, 2001

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the United States

should support the establishment of a Palestinian state

in the Middle East.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 United States should support the establishment of a Pal4 estinian state in the Middle East pursuant to an agree5 ment between the Government of Israel and the Pales6 tinian Authority.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Thomas F. Helms, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of North Atlantic
Holding Company, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

         (1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: November 15, 2004

                                              /s/ Thomas F. Helms, Jr.
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Thomas F. Helms, Jr.
                                              Chief Executive Officer
[Nos. 18813-9-II; 18814-7-II.

Division Two.

August 2, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles D. Paxton, et al., *Appellants.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Ska-mania County, No. 94-1-00020-7 and 94-1-00021-5, Ted Kolbaba, J., entered October 10, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C.J., concurred in by Morgan and Turner, JJ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 306

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Attorney General should

appoint an independent counsel to investigate and report on campaign

contributions made to the Democratic National Committee from the

People’s Republic of China.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 24, 2002

Mr. TRAFICANT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the Attorney General should appoint an independent counsel to investigate

and report on campaign contributions made to the Democratic National Committee from the People’s Republic

of China.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 Attorney General should appoint an independent counsel

4 to investigate and report on campaign contributions made

5 to the Democratic National Committee from the People’s

6 Republic of China.

Æ
### ENERGY 

### AND ENVIRONMENT 

### CABINET

Steven L. Beshear Governor 

### lsnard K. P€t€rs Secretary Gapital Plaza Tower Sfi) Mero Strcet. 12th Floor Franlcfort, Kentucky 4{F01 Phons (502) 56&7192 Fax: (502)

### 56+74U

June 25, 2008



### Mr. James I. Palmer, Jr. Regional

### Administrator U.S. EPA, Region 4 Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 303 03-8960



### DearMr. Palmer:



### The Kentucky Energy and 

### Environment Cabinet hereby submits 

### forfinal approval 

### to the U.S. 

### Environmental Protection 

### Agency 

### (EPA) 

### aformal revision 

### to Kentucky's State 

### Implementation Plan (SIP). 

### This revision includes 

### Kentucky's Regional Haze SIP

### for Kentucky's Class

### I area 

### in accordance 

### with the requirements 

### of the Clean

### AirAct Section 169A, and the regional haze and best available 

### retrofit technology 

### (BART) rules

### of 40 CFR 

### 51.308. The SIP 

### revision documents reasonable progrcss goals 

### for Kentucky's Class 

### I area Mammoth Cave National Park.


### A draft SIP revision was submitted

### tothe U.S. 

### EPA on 

### March 3,2008, and a 

### public hearing

### to receive comments 

### was conducted 

### on Aprlrl7,2008, atthe Kentucky 

### Division 

### for

### Air Quality's main 

### office 

### in Frankfort, 

### Kentucky. Documentation regardingthe 

### public hearing and acopy 

### ofthe Cabinet's Statement 

### of Consideration, which contains Cabinet responses to comments, is provided in Appendix N.



### This 

### final SIP package 

### includes

### a hard copy 

### of the SIP narrative and 

### DVDs containing that narrative and

### all of the associatedappendices. 

### In addition, the SIP documents are available electronically at:ftp.,l/I<ydaqusr:Aqua_222@kyftp0l.ky.gorr.



### Your prompt consideration 

### ofthis SIP 

### revision 

### is appreciated. 

## If you have 

### any questions 

### or comments concerning 

### this matter, please contact 

### Mr. Martin Luther,

### of my staff,

### at (502) 573-3382 

### or martin. luther@ky. gov. 

# -.4_



# &4.v#-z;

Leonard 

### K. Peters Secretarv 

# tdmrffi

An Equal Oppodunity Employer M/F/D
[No. 14376-7-III.

Division Three.

July 16, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Pedro Mendoza Flores, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 93-1-00487-0, Evan E. Sperline, J., entered August 15, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Munson, J.