alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3



JOINT FILING AGREEMENT


          In accordance with Rule 13d-1(k) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the undersigned hereby agree to the joint filing with all other Reporting Persons (as such term is defined in the Schedule 13D referred to below) on behalf of each of them a statement on Schedule 13D (including amendments thereto) with respect to the Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Gaiam, Inc. and that this Joint Filing Agreement be included as an Exhibit to such joint filing.  This Joint Filing Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby execute this Joint Filing Agreement.


August 15, 2005.

	
   
  	
  
REVOLUTION LIVING LLC
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 /s/
Stephen M. Case
  
	
  
 
  	
  


  
	
  
 
  	
  
Name:
  	
  
 Stephen M. Case 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
Title:
  	
  
 President and Chief Executive Officer 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
REVOLUTION LLC
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
  
By:
  	
  
  /s/
Stephen M. Case
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  


  
	
  
 
  	
  
Name:
  	
  
  Stephen M. Case 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
Title:
  	
   President and Chief Executive Officer
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
STEPHEN M. CASE REVOCABLE TRUST
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
By:
  	
  
  /s/ Stephen M. Case
  
	
   
  	
  
 
  	
  


  
	
  
 
  	
  
Name:
  	
  
Stephen M.   Case
  
	
  
 
  	
  
Title:
  	
  
Trustee
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
STEPHEN M. CASE
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
   /s/ Stephen M. Case
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7551]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Advisory Committee to the Director (ACD), Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention (CDC)

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the CDC announces the following meeting 
of the aforementioned committee.

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-3 p.m. (EDT), April 26, 2012.
    Place: CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Building 21, Rooms 1204 A/B, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333. This meeting is also available by 
teleconference. Please dial (877) 930-8819 and enter code 1579739.
    Status: Open to the public, limited only by the space available. 
The meeting room accommodates approximately 50 people. To 
accommodate public participation in the meeting, a conference 
telephone line will be available. The public is welcome to 
participate during the public comment period. The public comment 
period is tentatively scheduled from 2:45 p.m. until 2:50 p.m.
    Purpose: The committee will provide advice to the CDC Director 
on strategic and other broad issues facing CDC.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The Advisory Committee to the Director 
will receive updates from the Global Workgroup; State, Tribal, Local 
and Territorial Workgroup; the Policy Workgroup; the Communications 
Workgroup; the Ethics Subcommittee, and the Health Disparities 
Subcommittee, as well as an update from the CDC Director.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Contact Person for More Information: Carmen Villar, MSW, 
Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, 
1600 Clifton Road NE., M/S D-14, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 
404/639-7000, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#16515e7f757d7b77785675727538717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ca8d82a3a9a1a7aba48aa9aea9e4ada5bc">[email protected]</span></a>. The deadline for notification 
of attendance is April 20, 2012. To register for this meeting, 
please send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cdddfd8f5eef9ffe8f3eedcfff8ffb2fbf3ea"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dd9c9e99b4afb8bea9b2af9dbeb9bef3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>. The Director, Management 
Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to 
sign Federal Register notices pertaining to announcements of 
meetings and other committee management activities, for both the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 23, 2012.
Elizabeth Millington,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-7551 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Edward R. SALZETTI and Paula Salzetti, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Thomas K. BACKMAN and Nickole Backman, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 17671.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Nov. 18, 1981.

*544Brent D. Ward, Salt Lake City, for defendants and appellants.

Boyd L. Jentzsch, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs and respondents.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from an order finding the defendants in contempt for failure to deposit rentals in a case involving a lease which wound up in a receivership. The defendants, by affidavit, pleaded inability to make the deposit because their assets were frozen, and the trial court refused to lift the contempt order for any period, temporary or permanent.

Defendants on appeal urge three points to support their request that this Court order the vacation of the contempt finding and decision:

1. That the order finding defendants in contempt is a “final” appealable order.1 No one on appeal has urged otherwise. Defendants raise the issue apparently in anticipation that, being an “order,” the question of whether it was appealable might be raised. Such concern is dispelled by *Peterson v. Peterson.*
      *2*
      **The order is appealable.

2. That the evidence did not support the order of contempt. The proof standard in a case such as this was set forth in *Thomas v. Thomas*
      *3*
      **as follows:

> [I]n order to justify a finding of contempt and the imposition of a jail sentence, it must appear by clear and convincing proof that: (1), the party knew what was required of him; (2), that he had the ability to comply; and (3), that he wilfully and knowingly failed and refused to do so. [Citations omitted]

These three elements are factual questions which arguably could have been decided either way in the instant case, particularly the “ability to comply.” Unless the evidence was clear and convincing that defendants had the ability to comply, reversal would be justified.4 We need not reach that question, however, because of the dis-positive nature of defendants’ third point on appeal.

3.That the court did not memorialize its judgment by entering written findings of fact and conclusions, which was fatal to the enforceability of the contempt order. We agree. Based on the authority of *Adams*v. *Adams,*
      *5*
      **we reverse the contempt order of March 2, 1981, and order its dismissal *without prejudice.*

Reversed and remanded. Costs on appeal to defendants.

. Under U.C.A., 1953, 78-2-2.

. Utah, 530 P.2d 821 (1974), and cases cited therein.

. Utah, 569 P.2d 1119 (1977).

. *Bradshaw v. Kershaw,*Utah, 627 P.2d 528 (1981).

. 30 Utah 2d 121, 514 P.2d 536 (1973).
#### James Sterlon HUNT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-82-162.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 3, 1982.

*1078Robert Walker, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Jan Eric Cartwright, Atty. Gen., Susan Talbot, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Appellate Criminal Div., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On the evening of July 14, 1981, the appellant, James Sterlon Hunt, was arrested as he pulled his car into his apartment’s driveway by Oklahoma City Police Officers, Bryan Smythe and Jeff Kelly, pursuant to a signed complaint that he had pointed a firearm at Mrs. Vaughan Jones. Appellant was informed of the reason for his arrest and was read his *Miranda*rights, which he stated he understood. Hunt inquired regarding- his vehicle and was informed that departmental policy required impoundment, since he was arrested in it, unless he desired to consent to its search for the protection of any valuables that might be contained therein. Appellant stated that he wanted his vehicle to be left with his cousin, who resided at the same apartments, and he signed a prepared waiver form after it was read to him and he stated that he understood it completely. As a result thereof, one-thousand dollars ($1,000.00), now complained of, was discovered in an envelope in the car’s console located between the front bucket seats, and the cousin was entrusted with the keys to the vehicle. Both officers testified that in route to the jail the appellant offered them the money in the envelope if they would refrain from taking him there. Officer Smythe sought clarification of the offer and inquired of the appellant if he understood that such an offer was a felony, to which Hunt stated that he understood and again offered them the money, whereupon he was informed that he was being charged with offering to bribe a police officer. He was convicted of said charge in Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CRF-81-3197, and he appeals.

In an attenuated single assignment of error, the appellant argues that the money found in the envelope should have been suppressed, as the search which produced it was allegedly invalid because, he contends he was under duress when he gave permission and signed the waiver for the search. We do not find that the argument is well taken.

The State in its brief submits that the evidence sought to be suppressed, which was found prior to the bribing of the officers, was not contraband nor evidence of a crime when seized; thus, there was no reason to suppress the money, as it did not become evidence of a crime until after the bribery. We agree.

Moreover, even if the money had been suppressed and no mention made of it, as the appellant urges, we find that the State has presented, through the testimony of both Officer Smythe and Officer Kelly, evidence sufficient to establish a prima fa-cie case of offering to bribe a police officer. Error which occurred, if any there may be, was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *Chapman v. California,*386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967).

The judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., and CORNISH, J., dissent.
# Uradni list C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 138I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 6328. april 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 138I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 6328. april 2020

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informacije |
| | INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE |
| | Evropska komisija |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Izjava Komisije v zvezi z Uredbo (EU) 2020/560 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1379/2013 in Uredbe (EU) št. 508/2014 glede posebnih ukrepov za ublažitev posledic izbruha COVID-19 v sektorju ribištva in akvakulture | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

IV   Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

2020/C 138 I/01

Izjava Komisije v zvezi z Uredbo (EU) 2020/560 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1379/2013 in Uredbe (EU) št. 508/2014 glede posebnih ukrepov za ublažitev posledic izbruha COVID-19 v sektorju ribištva in akvakulture

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

IV Informacije

INFORMACIJE INSTITUCIJ, ORGANOV, URADOV IN AGENCIJ EVROPSKE UNIJE

Evropska komisija

| 28.4.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 138/1

---

Izjava Komisije v zvezi z Uredbo (EU) 2020/560 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 1379/2013 in Uredbe (EU) št. 508/2014 glede posebnih ukrepov za ublažitev posledic izbruha COVID-19 v sektorju ribištva in akvakulture

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Komisija je zadovoljna, da sta Evropski parlament in Svet hitro sprejela njen predlog o spremembi Evropskega sklada za pomorstvo in ribištvo, da bi ublažili vpliv izbruha COVID-19 ter pomagali našim ribičem in proizvajalcem v sektorju akvakulture.

Komisija želi izpostaviti dejstvo, da sta nadzor ribištva in zbiranje znanstvenih podatkov zelo pomembna za trajnostno upravljanje staležev rib na podlagi najboljšega razpoložljivega znanstvenega mnenja in zanesljivega izvrševanja. Zmanjšanje finančnih sredstev na tem področju ne bi smelo povzročiti poslabšanja rezultatov teh bistvenih elementov skupne ribiške politike.

Komisija želi poudariti, da njen predlog in njegove spremembe obravnavajo edinstvene krizne razmere, ki so nastale zaradi izbruha COVID-19, ter izredno in nujno potrebo po podpori za odpravo posledic tega izbruha. Ne morejo pa prejudicirati prihodnje uredbe o Evropskem skladu za pomorstvo in ribištvo.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification ofChief Executive Officer of GFI Group Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10,2007

| /s/ MICHAEL  GOOCH        |     |   |
|---------------------------|----------|--------|
| Michael Gooch             |     |
| *Chairman of the Board*   | * * |
| *Chief Executive Officer* | * * |

 

----
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the period certified. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                    |                                |
|-------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                    |
|                                      |                                    |                                |
| Date: November              14, 2006 | By:                           | /s/ Ramesh              Akella |
|                                      | Ramesh AkellaPresident, Chief Strategy  |
|                                      | Officer              and Director  |

----
Summary of Cash Compensation for Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc.



 Exhibit 10.20 
  
 SUMMARY OF CASH COMPENSATION 
 FOR DIRECTORS OF 
 WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. 
  
 Non-employee Directors of Worthington Industries, Inc. (the
“Company”) receive the following cash compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for serving as members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) or as members of Board committees.
Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their serving as directors, including travel expenses. 
  

			
	 Annual Retainer:
	    	 $35,000

		
	 Attendance at Board Meetings:
	    	 $1,500

	 (including telephonic meetings)
	    	 
		
	 Audit Committee Chairman
	    	 
	 Annual Retainer:
	    	 $10,000

		
	 Committee Chairman Other Than Audit
	    	 
	 Annual Retainer:
	    	 $5,000

		
	 Attendance At Committee Meetings:
	    	 $1,000

	 (including telephonic meetings)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

######  Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket T-1-2012]

On January 12, 2012, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board filed an application submitted by the Fargo Municipal Airport Authority, grantee of FTZ 267, requesting to expand manufacturing under temporary/interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority to include subassemblies and parts of tractors, combines, and wheel loaders, on behalf of CNH America LLC, within FTZ 267—Site 2, in Fargo, North Dakota.

                    The application was processed in accordance with T/IM procedures, as authorized by FTZ Board Orders 1347 (69 FR 52857, 8/30/04) and 1480 (71 FR 55422, 9/22/06), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (77 FR 2699, 1/19/2012). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval under T/IM procedures. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary in the above-referenced Board Orders, the application is approved, effective this date, until March 22, 2012, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                

Dated: March 23, 2012.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7598 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 20, 2013

t0917

Order 

Clerk

September 20, 2013

146603 & (42)(43)

HELEN YONO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146603

COA: 308968

Ct of Claims: 11-000117-MD

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2012 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on 

whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties 

shall submit supplemental briefs within 35 days of the date of this order addressing 

whether the parallel parking area where the plaintiff fell is in the improved portion of the 

highway designed for vehicular travel within the meaning of MCL 691.1402(1). They 

should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS

I, Thomas Kaetzer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
Baseline Oil & Gas Corp., a Nevada corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and

(2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                  
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2007 |  |                                  
|                         | 
|                         |  | /s/ Thomas Kaetzer               
|                         |  | Thomas Kaetzer                   
|                         |  | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 4

Relative to rule 16.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. MCCAIN) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

Relative to rule 16.

1 SECTION 1. Notwithstanding any precedent to the

2 contrary, the prohibition against legislative proposals con3 tained in rule 16 shall be enforced by the Chair.

Æ