alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





COUNSEL RB CAPITAL INC.





OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





The undersigned Allan C. Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of Counsel RB Capital Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.





March 31, 2011





/s/ Allan C. SilberAllan SilberChairman of the Board and PresidentPrincipal Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 21 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 21

 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the primary author and the 
                  official home of ``Yankee Doodle''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2001

 Mr. McNulty submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the primary author and the 
                  official home of ``Yankee Doodle''.

Whereas the song ``Yankee Doodle'' is humorous, patriotic, and dates back to the 
        colonial period of America;
Whereas ``Yankee Doodle'' was popular from its inception, spreading throughout 
        New England and the Middle Atlantic States, where it was sung at 
        parades, in taverns, and beside campfires;
Whereas the British soldiers, known as Redcoats, began singing the song at the 
        beginning of the American Revolution as a means of deriding the rag-tag 
        Continental Army;
Whereas, after the Battle of Lexington, ``Yankee Doodle'' became an anthem and a 
        source of pride among the rough-hewn Americans who were taking on the 
        polished British Redcoats;
Whereas, while the tune of ``Yankee Doodle'' originated in Europe as a common 
        air, many claims as to the authorship of the lyrics have been made;
Whereas, despite the other claims, Dr. Richard Shuckburgh, a British Army 
        surgeon who served on America's frontier for most of his adult life, is 
        today generally considered to be the primary author of the lyrics to 
        ``Yankee Doodle''; and
Whereas Dr. Shuckburgh is believed to have written almost all, if not all, of 
        the lyrics for ``Yankee Doodle'' at Fort Crailo in the present-day city 
        of Rensselaer, New York, after viewing the provincial forces gathered 
        there during the 1750's for an attack on Fort Ticonderoga: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Dr. Richard Shuckburgh should be recognized and honored 
        as the primary author of ``Yankee Doodle''; and
            (2) Fort Crailo, located in the city of Rensselaer, New 
        York, should be recognized as the ``Home of Yankee Doodle''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Administrator's Line of Succession Designation, No. 1-A, Revision 
33

    This document replaces and supersedes ``Line of Succession 
Designation No. 1-A, Revision 32.''
    Line of Succession Designation No. 1-A, Revision 33:
    Effective immediately, the Administrator's Line of Succession 
Designation is as follows:
    (a) In the event of my inability to perform the functions and 
duties of my position, or my absence from the office, the Deputy 
Administrator will assume all functions and duties of the 
Administrator. In the event the Deputy Administrator and I are both 
unable to perform the functions and duties of the position or are 
absent from our offices, I designate the officials in listed order 
below, if they are eligible to act as Administrator under the 
provisions of the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 (5 U.S.C. 3345-
3349d), to serve as Acting Administrator with full authority to perform 
all acts which the Administrator is authorized to perform:
    (1) Chief of Staff;
    (2) General Counsel;
    (3) Chief Operating Officer;
    (4) Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Assistance; and
    (5) Regional Administrator for Region 8.
    (b) Notwithstanding the provisions of SBA Standard Operating 
Procedure 00 01 2, ``absence from the office,'' as used in reference to 
myself in paragraph (a) above, means the following:
    (1) I am not present in the office and cannot be reasonably 
contacted by phone or other electronic means, and there is an immediate 
business necessity for the exercise of my authority; or
    (2) I am not present in the office and, upon being contacted by 
phone or other electronic means, I determine that I cannot exercise my 
authority effectively without being physically present in the office.
    (c) An individual serving in an acting capacity in any of the 
positions listed in subparagraphs (a)(1) through (5), unless designated 
as such by the Administrator, is not also included in this Line of 
Succession. Instead, the next non-acting incumbent in the Line of 
Succession shall serve as Acting Administrator.
    (d) This designation shall remain in full force and effect until 
revoked or superseded in writing by the Administrator, or by the Deputy 
Administrator when serving as Acting Administrator.
    (e) Serving as Acting Administrator has no effect on the officials 
listed in subparagraphs (a)(1) through (5), above, with respect to 
their full-time position's authorities, duties and responsibilities 
(except that such official cannot both recommend and approve an 
action).

    Dated: March 15, 2012
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-8015 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 7 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 7

   To amend Senate Resolution 208 of the 105th Congress to increase 
 funding of the Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology-Related 
                               Problems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Lott (for Mr. Bennett) submitted the following resolution; which 
       was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To amend Senate Resolution 208 of the 105th Congress to increase 
 funding of the Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology-Related 
                               Problems.

    Resolved, That section 5(a)(1) of Senate Resolution 208, agreed to 
April 2, 1998 (105th Congress), as amended by Senate Resolution 231, 
agreed to May 18, 1998, is amended by--
            (1) striking ``$575,000'' both places it appears and 
        inserting ``$875,000''; and
            (2) striking ``$200,000'' and inserting ``$500,000''.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

March 20, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12357

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00479-CV-FTM-99-DNF

LIFETIME HOMES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

versus 

WALKER HOMES, INC., 

RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

RESIDENTIAL LAND ACQUISITIONS, 

AMERILAND INVESTMENTS, LLC, 

SGD INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(March 20, 2008)
 Honorable W. Harold Albritton, United States District Judge for the Middle District of *

Alabama, sitting by designation.

2

Before HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges, and ALBRITTON, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

After careful review of the briefs and the benefit of oral argument, we find

no reversible error in the district court’s opinion. 

AFFIRMED.
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 146

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, May 25, 2001, or Saturday, May 26,

4 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand
2

HCON 146 RDS

1 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, June 5, 2001, or until

2 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas3 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

4 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

5 or adjourns at the close of business on Saturday, May 26,

6 2001, Sunday, May 27, 2001, or Tuesday, May 29, 2001,

7 on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

8 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

9 or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, June 5, 2001, or

10 until such time on that day as may be specified by its

11 Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

12 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

13 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

14 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

15 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

16 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

17 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead18 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

19 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

20 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives May 26 (legislative day, May 25), 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MuellerWater Products, Inc. (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Jeffery W.Sprick, the Chief Financial Officer of Mueller Water Products, Inc.,certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Water Products, Inc.

| Date: February 3, 2006 |   |                      |
|-----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                        |   |                      |
|                             | By:    | /s/ JEFFERY W. SPRICK     |
|                        |   | Jeffery W. Sprick         |
|                        |   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, James Hooke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ James HookeJames HookeChief Executive OfficerMay 4, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ansoft Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas A.N. Miller,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2004

                                    By: /s/ Thomas A.N. Miller
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Thomas A.N. Miller
                                    Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, T. Don Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ T. Don WaddellT. Don WaddellChief Financial OfficerAugust 15, 2011
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LEONORA RYAN

*Norman A. Pattis,*in support of the petition.

*Mitchell S. Brody,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 148 (AC 15840), is denied.

BERDON, J.,

dissenting. I would grant the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00414-CV

In re Dry Utilities, LLC and Steven W. Hooge

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

Relators’ emergency motion for temporary relief is also denied.

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Theofanis

Filed: July 28, 2023
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
873 

Bon. COO. x. 00x, pege 8 

“Act. 7c50. Saoitory 

ambatlon an& _. health _ 

tu drh to dTso* 

able in the negatlm. 

that the law rewire8 044 

Yo tm l 8teatlon is 0a ll.w a 

*AU health oertitioata8 e&lled for by Shl8 

Aqt.swll be dlrplaywl ior p"sBlla inrpeatioa 

ut the plaos Mmm tlm pu8On lwud tnla emplo~d, uld shall aot be roaorti frum 

ouoh ylaoe durtig the Ooatlnaanoo Q? mmh 

erap10meW weapt ?ir.e publia health 
Eo1:. ceil. 3. Gas, y&&4 6 
me. o&o. a-. CQX, ps@ns b 
.%’ 

1.5., 

I~.
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Foschia, Appellant, *v.*Cavell.

*34Submitted November 14, 1961.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Rudy Fosehia,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Michael A. Manna,*District Attorney, *for*appellee.

December 14, 1961:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Weiner of the Court of Common Pleas of Washington County, as reported in 25 Pa. D. & C. 2d 768.
[No. 14430-5-III.

Division Three.

June 11, 1996.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Katherine J. Justus, *Appellant,*and Duane R. Justus, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 93-3-01430-7, Tari Eitzen, J., entered October 6, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Sweeney, C.J., and Munson, J.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

Addison Jet Management, Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

--------------) 

Docket No. [To Be Assigned] 

Judge Richard C. Goodwin 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

As the parties have reached an agreement in this matter, the complaint filed on April 6, 

2012, is hereby withdrawn. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

f 

By: ./. 

7 

p· Autumn Killingham 

, . .Attorney, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 · 

Telephone: (202) 267-7728 ,. -

RECEIVED 

JAN 3 0 2013 

HEARING DOCKET 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint, in the matter of Addison Jet 

Management, Inc., has been mailed this date by via overnight mail to: 

Gerald P. Shaw 

Director of Operations 

Addison Jet Management, Inc. 

7 515 Lemmon A venue 

Dallas, TX 75209 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

The original and one copy was also hand-delivered this date to: 

Hearing Docket, AGC-430 (Original and one copy) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Atten: Hearing Docket Clerk 

January 30, 2013 

..
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 113 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 113

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that the Pledge of 
     Allegiance to the Flag of the United States be recited at the 
            commencement of the daily session of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 9, 1999

Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mrs. Feinstein, 
 and Mr. Helms) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
              to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that the Pledge of 
     Allegiance to the Flag of the United States be recited at the 
            commencement of the daily session of the Senate.

Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is our Nation's most revered 
        and preeminent symbol;
Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is recognized and respected 
        throughout the world as a symbol of democracy, freedom, and human 
        rights;
Whereas, in the words of the Chief Justice of the United States, the Flag of the 
        United States of America ``in times of national crisis, inspires and 
        motivates the average citizen to make personal sacrifices in order to 
        achieve societal goals of overriding importance...and serves as a 
        reminder of the paramount importance of pursuing the ideals that 
        characterize our society'';
Whereas the House of Representatives of the United States has opened each of its 
        daily sessions with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United 
        States of America since 1988; and
Whereas opening each of the daily sessions of the Senate of the United States 
        with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States would 
        demonstrate reverence for the Flag and serve as a daily reminder to all 
        Senators of the ideals that it represents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That paragraph 1(a) of rule IV of the Standing Rules of 
the Senate is amended by inserting after ``prayer by the Chaplain'' the 
following: ``and after the Presiding Officer leads the Senate in 
reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc., formerly XL Generation International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

Dated this 14th day of November, 2007.

MICHEL ST-PIERRE
Michel St-PierreChief Financial Officer

















---