Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19745 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Brilliant 

Technologies Corporation because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended March 31, 2007. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 4C Controls, 

Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 

reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2009. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 2–Track 

Global, Inc. because it has not filed any 

periodic reports since the period ended 

September 30, 2009. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 

trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 29, 

2012, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT 

on April 12, 2012. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7942 Filed 3–29–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[File No. 500–1] 

Angstrom Microsystems Corp., 

Bedminster National Corp., Brake 

Headquarters U.S.A., Inc., and 

BrandPartners Group, Inc.; Order of 

Suspension of Trading 

March 29, 2012. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Angstrom 

Microsystems Corp. because it has not 

filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2008. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Bedminster 

National Corp. because it has not filed 

any periodic reports since the period 

ended September 30, 2008. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of Brake 

Headquarters U.S.A., Inc. because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 1998. 

It appears to the Securities and 

Exchange Commission that there is a 

lack of current and accurate information 

concerning the securities of 

BrandPartners Group, Inc. because it has 

not filed any periodic reports since the 

period ended September 30, 2009. 

The Commission is of the opinion that 

the public interest and the protection of 

investors require a suspension of trading 

in the securities of the above-listed 

companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 

pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 

trading in the securities of the abovelisted companies is suspended for the 

period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 29, 

2012, and terminating at 11:59 p.m. EDT 

on April 12, 2012. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7943 Filed 3–29–12; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

[Dispute No. WTO/DS429] 

WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding 

Regarding United States; AntiDumping Measures on Certain Shrimp 

from Viet Nam 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: The Office of the United 

States Trade Representative (AUSTR@) 

is providing notice that on February 21, 

2012, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

(‘‘Vietnam’’) requested consultations 

with the United States under the 

Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the 

World Trade Organization (AWTO 

Agreement@) concerning certain 

antidumping administrative reviews 

and a sunset review conducted by the 

Department of Commerce on imports of 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam (Investigation A–552–802), and 

various U.S. laws, regulations, 

administrative procedures, practices, 

and methodologies. That request may be 

found at www.wto.org contained in a 

document designated as WT/DS429/1. 

USTR invites written comments from 

the public concerning the issues raised 

in this dispute. 

DATES: Although USTR will accept any 

comments received during the course of 

the dispute settlement proceedings, 

comments should be submitted on or 

before April 13, 2012, to be assured of 

timely consideration by USTR. 

ADDRESSES: Public comments should be 

submitted electronically using 

www.regulations.gov, docket number 

USTR–2012–0003. If you are unable to 

provide submissions using 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

If (as explained below) the comment 

contains confidential information, then 

the comment should be submitted by 

fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 

395–3640. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

J. Daniel Stirk, Associate General 

Counsel, Office of the United States 

Trade Representative, 600 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395– 

3150. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is 

providing notice that consultations have 

been requested pursuant to the WTO 

Understanding on Rules and Procedures 

Governing the Settlement of Disputes 

(‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should 

fail to resolve the matter and a dispute 

settlement panel is established pursuant 

to the DSU, such panel, which would 

hold its meetings in Geneva, 

Switzerland, would be expected to issue 

a report on its findings and 

recommendations within nine months 

after it is established. 

Major Issues Raised by Vietnam 

On February 21, 2012, Vietnam 

requested consultations regarding 

certain antidumping administrative 

reviews and a sunset review conducted 

by the Department of Commerce on 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam, referring in particular to the 

use of what it describes as ‘‘zeroing’’ in 

those reviews. Specifically, Vietnam 

challenges (1) the imposition of 

antidumping duties and cash deposit 

requirements pursuant to the final 

results of the fourth administrative 

review for the period from February 1, 

2008, to January 31, 2009, in Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 47771 (August 9, 2010); 

(2) the fourth administrative review of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

insofar as it did not revoke the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

certain respondents requesting such 

revocation; (3) the imposition of 

antidumping duties and cash deposit 

requirements pursuant to the final 

results of the fifth administrative review 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

19746 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 

for the period from February 1, 2009, 

through January 31, 2010, in Certain 

Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results and Final Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 76 FR 56158 (September 12, 

2011); (4) the fifth administrative review 

of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam 

insofar as it did not revoke the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

certain respondents requesting such 

revocation; (5) any other ongoing or 

future antidumping administrative 

reviews, and the preliminary and final 

results thereof, related to the imports of 

certain frozen warmwater shrimp from 

Vietnam (DOC case A–552–802), as well 

as any assessment instructions, cash 

deposit requirements, and revocation 

determinations issued pursuant to such 

reviews; (6) the final results of the 

sunset review in which the Department 

of Commerce determined that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would be likely to lead to the 

continuation or recurrence of dumping, 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Final Results of the First Five-Year 

‘‘Sunset’’ Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order, 75 FR 75965 (December 7, 

2010); and 

(7) Section 129 of the Uruguay Round 

Agreements Act (‘‘URAA’’) and the 

Statement of Administrative Action 

accompanying the URAA, H.R. Doc. No. 

103–316 (1994), reprinted in 1994 

U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040. 

With regard to these measures, 

Vietnam also has indicated it would like 

to consult regarding various U.S. laws, 

regulations, administrative procedures, 

practices, and methodologies, including 

(1) the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

in particular sections 731, 751, 752, 

771(7), 771(35)(A), 771(35)(B), and 

777A(d); (2) Section 129 of the URAA; 

(3) the Statement of Administrative 

Action accompanying the URAA, H.R. 

Doc. No. 103–316 (1994), reprinted in 

1994 U.S.C.C.A.N. 4040; (4) Department 

of Commerce regulations set forth in 

part 351 of Title 19 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations, in particular 

sections 351.218 and 351.414; (5) the 

Import Administration Antidumping 

Manual (2009 ed.), including the 

computer programs referenced therein; 

(6) the Department of Commerce’s 

Policy Bulletin 98.3, ‘‘Policies 

Governing the Conduct of Five-Year 

(‘Sunset’) Reviews of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders’’ (April 16, 

1998), 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998); (7) 

the Department of Commerce’s 

methodology for determining margins of 

dumping in administrative reviews; (8) 

the practice of requiring submission of 

a separate rate application or 

certification in original investigations 

and periodic reviews concerning 

Vietnamese producers in order to 

qualify for the all others—or 

‘‘separate’’—rate; (9) the practice of 

limiting the number of respondents 

selected for individual examination to 

only a small fraction of the total number 

of companies seeking individual review 

and the accompanying failure to provide 

alternative methods for non-investigated 

respondents to demonstrates that they 

are no longer dumping; (10) the 

application of a so-called Vietnam-wide 

entity rate based on adverse facts 

available to respondents not 

individually investigated who fail to 

provide a separate rate application or 

certification to demonstrate the absence 

of government control; (11) the practice 

of denying individually examined and 

non-individually examined respondents 

the opportunity to demonstrate the 

absence of dumping, which would 

allow for the dumping order to be 

revoked as to individual respondents 

that cease dumping behavior; (12) the 

Department of Commerce’s practice and 

methodology in five-year (‘‘sunset’’) 

reviews for determining whether 

revocation of antidumping orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping; and (13) the 

practice of implementing adverse 

Dispute Settlement Body rulings, 

pursuant to Section 129 of the URAA, 

such that unliquidated entries entered 

or withdrawn from the warehouse for 

consumption prior to the date of a 

Section 129 determination remain 

subject to assessment of duties pursuant 

to the original antidumping duty 

determination. 

Vietnam alleges that these laws, 

regulations, administrative procedures, 

practices, and methodologies are, as 

such and as applied in the 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce and actions by U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection in the shrimp 

administrative reviews and the sunset 

review, inconsistent with Articles I:1, 

VI:1, VI:2, and X:3(a) of the General 

Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994; 

Articles 1, 2.1, 2.4, 2.4.2, 6, 9, 11, 

17.6(i), and Annex II of the Agreement 

on Implementation of Article VI of the 

General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 

1994 (the Antidumping Agreement); 

Article XVI:4 of the WTO Agreement; 

Articles 3.7, 19.1, 21.1, 21.3, and 21.5 of 

the DSU; and Vietnam’s Protocol of 

Accession to the WTO. 

Vietnam alleges that the United States 

acted inconsistently with the WTO 

Agreement obligations identified above 

by applying so-called ‘‘zeroing’’ in the 

determination of the margins of 

dumping in the reviews identified 

above, by limiting the selection of 

Vietnamese respondents seeking a 

review such that non-reviewed 

companies were denied an opportunity 

to demonstrate the absence of dumping, 

by treating the Vietnam-wide entity as a 

single entity and applying to that entity 

a dumping rate determined on the basis 

of facts available, the continued use of 

these practices, the use of dumping 

margins calculated using ‘‘zeroing’’ to 

make the final determination in the 

sunset review, and the use of WTOinconsistent antidumping duty 

assessment rates applied to 

unliquidated entries that are assessed 

following a Section 129 determination 

that implements an adverse WTO 

Dispute Settlement Body ruling. 

Public Comment: Requirements for 

Submissions 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments concerning 

the issues raised in this dispute. Persons 

may submit public comments 

electronically using 

www.regulations.gov docket number 

USTR–2012–0003. If you are unable to 

provide submissions using 

www.regulations.gov, please contact 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to 

arrange for an alternative method of 

transmission. 

To submit comments via 

www.regulations.gov, enter docket 

number USTR–2012–0003 on the home 

page and click ‘‘search’’. The site will 

provide a search-results page listing all 

documents associated with this docket. 

Find a reference to this notice by 

selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document 

Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link 

entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment.’’ (For 

further information on using the 

www.regulations.gov Web site, please 

consult the resources provided on the 

Web site by clicking on ‘‘Help’’ at the 

top of the home page.) 

The www.regulations.gov site 

provides the option of providing 

comments by filling in a ‘‘Type 

Comments’’ field, or by attaching a 

document using an ‘‘upload file’’ field. 

It is expected that most comments will 

be provided in an attached document. If 

a document is attached, it is necessary 

and sufficient to type ‘‘See attached’’ in 

the ‘‘Type Comments’’ field. A person 

requesting that information contained in 

a comment submitted by that person be 

treated as confidential business 

information must certify that such 

information is business confidential and 

would not customarily be released to 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 63 / Monday, April 2, 2012 / Notices 19747 

the public by the submitter. 

Confidential business information must 

be clearly designated as such and the 

submission must be marked ‘‘BUSINESS 

CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top and bottom 

of the cover page and each succeeding 

page. Any comment containing business 

confidential information must be 

submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at 

(202) 395–3640. A non-confidential 

summary of the confidential 

information must be submitted to 

www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in 

the docket and open to public 

inspection. 

Information or advice contained in a 

comment submitted, other than business 

confidential information, may be 

determined by USTR to be confidential 

in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that 

information or advice may qualify as 

such, the submitter— 

(1) Must clearly so designate the 

information or advice; 

(2) Must clearly mark the material as 

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the 

top and bottom of the cover page and 

each succeeding page; and 

(3) Must provide a non-confidential 

summary of the information or advice. 

Any comment containing confidential 

information must be submitted by fax. A 

non-confidential summary of the 

confidential information must be 

submitted to www.regulations.gov. The 

non-confidential summary will be 

placed in the docket and open to public 

inspection. Pursuant to section 127(e) of 

the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 

U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will maintain a 

docket on this dispute settlement 

proceeding accessible to the public at 

www.regulations.gov, docket number 

USTR–2012–0003. 

The public file will include nonconfidential comments received by 

USTR from the public with respect to 

the dispute. If a dispute settlement 

panel is convened or in the event of an 

appeal from such a panel, the U.S. 

submissions, any non-confidential 

submissions, or non-confidential 

summaries of submissions, received 

from other participants in the dispute, 

will be made available to the public on 

USTR’s Web site at www.ustr.gov, and 

the report of the panel, and, if 

applicable, the report of the Appellate 

Body, will be available on the Web site 

of the World Trade Organization, 

www.wto.org. Comments open to public 

inspection may be viewed on the 

www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Bradford L. Ward, 

Acting Assistant United States Trade 

Representative for Monitoring and 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7605 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

[Order 2012–3–7; Docket DOT–OST–2012– 

0022] 

Proposed Cancelation 

of the Air Taxi Authority Of VIH 

Cougar Helicopters, Inc. 

AGENCY: Department of Transportation. 

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause 

(Order 2012–3–7) Docket DOT–OST– 

2012–0022. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Transportation is directing all interested 

persons to show cause why it should 

not issue an order finding that VIH 

Cougar Helicopters, Inc. is not a U.S. 

citizen as defined in 49 U.S.C. 

40102(a)(15) and canceling its Part 298 

exemption authority. 

DATES: Persons wishing to file 

objections should do so no later than 

April 2, 2012. . 

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to 

objections should be filed in Docket 

DOT–OST–2012–0022 and addressed to 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, (M–30, Room W12– 

140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West 

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 

20590, and should be served upon the 

parties listed in Attachment A to the 

order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness 

Division (X–56, Room W86–465), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, (202) 366–7785. 

Susan L. Kurland, 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6408 Filed 3–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary of 

Transportation 

[Docket No. DOT–OST–2012–0046] 

Notice of Transportation Services’ 

Transition from Paper to Electronic 

Fare Media 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Transportation’s Office of 

Transportation Services (TRANServe), 

located within the Office of the 

Assistant Secretary for Administration, 

has initiated the adoption of a new 

program distribution methodology for 

transit benefits. TRANServe has shifted 

to electronic fare media in specific areas 

in New York, parts of the National 

Capitol Region, and parts of the 

Southeast. TRANServe intends to 

implement electronic fare media across 

the United States within the eight 

TRANServe Geographic Service Areas 

as it ensures that the implementation in 

each area will be consistent with 

applicable statutes and regulations. The 

implementation of electronic 

distribution, and a limited paper 

voucher process, allows for the most 

effective and efficient mechanism for 

the qualified transportation fringe 

benefit. 

DATES: TRANServe will consider all 

comments received on or before April 

23, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

by the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit or 

view comments and to view supporting 

and related materials available 

electronically. 

• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: 

Please send one copy of your comment 

to Docket No. DOT–OST–2012–0046, 

DOT/TRANServe, 1200 New Jersey Ave. 

SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

Reading Room (Public Terminal): You 

may read any comments that we receive 

on this docket in our reading room 

(Public Terminal). The reading room is 

located in room W12–140 of the US 

DOT 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC. Normal reading room 

hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

To be sure someone is there to help you, 

please call (202) 366–9826 or (202) 366– 

9317 before arriving. 

Other Information: Additional 

information about TRANServe is 

available on the internet at (http:// 

transerve.dot.gov/index.html). 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES