alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 24 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 24

               Supporting a National Foster Parents Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2001

Mr. Gilchrest submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
               Supporting a National Foster Parents Day.

Whereas the family, serving as the primary source of love, identity, self-
        esteem, and support, is the very foundation of our communities, and our 
        United States;
Whereas over 142,000 foster families, who open their homes and hearts to 
        children whose families are in crisis, play a vital role in helping 
        children heal and reconnect and in launching those children into 
        successful adulthood;
Whereas 20,000 youth reach their 18th birthday and ``age out'' of foster care 
        each year, too often unprepared and without the ongoing support and 
        guidance of caring adults; and
Whereas numerous individuals and public and private organizations work to 
        increase public awareness of the needs of children in foster care as 
        well as recognition of the enduring and valuable contributions of foster 
        parents: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a National Foster Parents Day should be established to 
        recognize the contributions of foster parents across the 
        Nation; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States and interested groups to 
        conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to 
        demonstrate support for foster parents across the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Robert M. STAFFORD, Appellee.

No. 93-0042.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 6, 1993.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Wolfe, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse but certify the following question as one of great public importance:

> Whether the manufacture of crack cocaine by law enforcement officials for use in a reverse-sting operation constitutes governmental misconduct which violates the due process clause of the Florida Constitution, where the charge is solicitation to pur*861chase, i.e. whether *Metcalf v. State,*614 So.2d 548 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), is correct?

> Reversed.

HERSEY and KLEIN, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.
#### Consolidated Railway and Light Company, Appellant, *v.*Electric Bond and Share Company et al., Respondents.

*Consolidated Ry.*& *Light Co. v. Electric Bond & Share*Co., 158 App. Div. 932, affirmed.

(Argued February 3, 1916;

decided April 11, 1916.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 12, 1918, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint and the direction of a verdict in favor of defendant company upon its counterclaim in an action to recover from the defendants damages alleged to have resulted from a conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff in connection with the purchase of stock of the Durham Light and Power Company. The defendant Electric Bond and Share Company put in a counterclaim for a balance due on a promissory note given in the course of the transaction by the plaintiff.

*Alvin C. Cass*for appellant.

*L. B. Duer, Craham Sumner*and *R. E. Coulson*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hisoook, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa, sitting by designation.

 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Court Judge. 2

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 97-3887

______________

Beverly Horn, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

Bassett Furniture * District of Missouri

Industries, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

_______________

Submitted: April 15, 1998

 Filed: June 26, 1998

_______________

Before LOKEN and LAY, Circuit Judges, and PRATT , District Judge. 1

PER CURIAM

Beverly Horn appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, granting summary judgment in favor of 2
Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc., on Horn’s claims of race discrimination and hostile

work environment in violation of Title VII, disability discrimination in violation of the

Americans with Disabilities Act, and violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act.

We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. See Hanenburg v.

Principal Mut. Life Ins. Co., 118 F.3d 570, 573 (8th Cir. 1997); Barge v.

Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 87 F.3d 256, 258 (8th Cir. 1996). 

Having considered the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the

district court properly granted summary judgment and therefore affirm, for the reasons

stated by the district court in its Memorandum and Order of June 19, 1997. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 312 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 312

 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
                    in State of Indiana v. Amy Han.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation 
                    in State of Indiana v. Amy Han.

Whereas, in the case of State of Indiana v. Amy Han, C. No. 99-148243, pending 
        in the Indiana Superior Court of Marion County, Criminal Division, 
        testimony has been requested from Lesley Reser and Lane Ralph, employees 
        in the office of Senator Richard Lugar;
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to 
        any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their official 
        responsibilities;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of 
        the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will 
        take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with 
        the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Lesley Reser and Lane Ralph, and any other employee 
of Senator Lugar's office from whom testimony may be required, are 
authorized to testify and produce documents in the case of State of 
Indiana v. Amy Han, except concerning matters for which a privilege 
should be asserted.
    Sec. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to represent Lesley 
Reser, Lane Ralph, and any other employee of Senator Lugar's office in 
connection with the testimony and document production authorized in 
section one of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 10.5

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT

      THIS  TERMINATION  AGREEMENT  (the  "Agreement")  is made and entered into
effective  as of July 20,  2005,  by and  between  ARIELWAY  , INC.,  a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  and  CORNELL  CAPITAL  PARTNERS,  LP, a Delaware
limited partnership (the "Investor").

                                    Recitals:

      WHEREAS,  the  Company and the  Investor  entered  into an standby  equity
distribution  agreement  dated as of  September  30, 2004 (the  "Standby  Equity
Distribution Agreement");  a registration rights agreement dated as of September
30, 2004 (the "Registration  Rights Agreement") and an escrow agreement dated as
of  September  30, 2004 (the  "Escrow  Agreement").  (Collectively,  the Standby
Equity Distribution Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement, and the Escrow
Agreement are referred to as the "Transaction Documents."

      NOW, THEREFORE,  in consideration of the promises and the mutual promises,
conditions and covenants  contained herein and in the Transaction  Documents and
other good and valuable consideration,  receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto agree as follows:

      1. Termination. Each of the parties to this Agreement hereby terminate the
Transaction  Documents  and the  respective  rights  and  obligations  contained
therein.  As a result of this  provision,  none of the  parties  shall  have any
rights or obligations under or with respect to the Transaction Documents.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed and delivered this Termination
Agreement on the date first set forth above.

                                       ARIELWAY, INC.

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Arne Dunhem
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                       CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP

                                       By: Yorkville Advisors, LLC
                                       Its: General Partner

                                       By:
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Mark A. Angelo
                                       Title:  Portfolio Manager
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Sena

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authori

3 to be used on April 18, 2001, for a ceremony as part 

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremo
2

•HCON 14 EH

1 shall be carried out in accordance with such condition

2 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives January 31,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol

for a ceremony as part of the commemoration ofthe days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.
Docket Number: FAA-2013-0467
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0619 0620

Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 8/30/2012

ENGINEER: Austin \ AH

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: Chemical resistant protective gloves, safety

glasses with side-shields, body protection.

Respirator: Wear a NIOSH-certified (or equivalent)

respirator as necessary.

Health Effects: Harmful if swallowed. May cause allergic

skin reaction. May cause eye, skin and respiratory tract

irritation.

TLV/PEL:

None established.
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (09/16/2011):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T2 Amine salt: P1B1T2; Methanesulfon acid:

 P1B1T1

Health: Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: Water (All releases to water with a CC = 770 ppb),

XB Testing (Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0619 0620
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0619 0620
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 11-0619 0620
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]
file:///J|/INITENG/P11%20cases/p110619c.en1.txt[10/3/2012 9:40:11 AM]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 251 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 251

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
October 17, 2001, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
October 23, 2001, for morning hour debate, or until Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Wednesday, October 17, 2001, or 
Thursday, October 18, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, or at 
such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until Members 
are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at 
such place and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 17, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 251

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
```
1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2892

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Charles P. Seacrest, * District of Nebraska.

*

Appellant. * [UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: November 28, 2001

 Filed: November 30, 2001

___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles P. Seacrest appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) sentence-reduction motion. Having carefully reviewed the record and

the parties’ submissions on appeal, we adopt the court’s reasoning--that Amendment

599 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines is inapplicable to Seacrest--and, accordingly,

we affirm its judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 182

Designating October 1999 as ‘‘National Stamp Collecting Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1999

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. COCHRAN) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating October 1999 as ‘‘National Stamp Collecting

Month’’.

Whereas over 150 years ago, United States commemorative

stamps began honoring the people, places, and events

that have shaped our Nation’s history;

Whereas in 1999, more than 22,000,000 Americans, including children, collect and learn about our Nation through

stamps, making stamp collecting one of the most popular

hobbies in our Nation and the world;

Whereas as we stand on the threshold of the 21st century,

it is important that we pause to reflect on our Nation’s

history;

Whereas stamps honor statesmen and soldiers who fought for

freedom and democracy, recognize our Nation’s scientific

and technological achievements, pay tribute to our Na-
2

SRES 182 IS

tion’s artistic legacy, and celebrate the strength of our

Nation’s diversity;

Whereas starting October 1, 1999, ‘‘National Stamp Collecting Month’’ will transform more than 100,000

schools, libraries, and post offices into learning centers

where our Nation’s young people can honor the past and

celebrate the future through stamps;

Whereas the founders and participants of ‘‘National Stamp

Collecting Month’’ include millions of adult and youth

collectors, thousands of teachers and schools, the American Philatelic Society, and the United States Postal

Service;

Whereas the people, places, and events shaping America

today will be United States commemorative stamps tomorrow;

Whereas ‘‘National Stamp Collecting Month’’ will help empower our Nation’s children and future generations to

study and learn from our Nation’s history; and

Whereas as our Nation’s children learn the lessons of the

past, the children will be better prepared to guide our

Nation in the future: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates October 1999

2 as ‘‘National Stamp Collecting Month’’.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. Robert NORWOOD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-1072.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1987.

In re Norwood, Robert; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,  Gregory E. Hyland, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Group, LLC;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:February 9, 2007
|        | /s/ GREGORY E.  HYLAND                  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   | Gregory E. Hyland                       |
|   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 10.1


GREENMAN
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

July 31, 2005

Mr. David A. Barclay
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Republic Services, Inc.
110 SE 6th Street - 28th Floor
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Regarding:  Promissory Note Dated May 6, 2003 to Republic Services of Georgia,
            Limited Partnership ("RSLP"), a Delaware limited partnership (as
            successor to United Waste Service, Inc.)

Dear David:

Pursuant our discussions, RSLP hereby agrees to waive any and all defaults which
may now exist as a result of GreenMan's failure to timely make interest and
principal payments due under the above referenced promissory note prior to July
31, 2005. In addition, RSLP has agreed to defer all interest and principal
payments due through June 30, 2006 at which time all interest and principal
payments under the promissory note that are otherwise due and payable on or
before that date (together with accrued but unpaid interest therein) shall be
incorporated into an new self amortizing promissory note, payable in 48 monthly
installments bearing interest at 10% per annum.

David, if you are in agreement with the above, please acknowledge your agreement
below and forward this letter back to my attention.

Sincerely,


/s/ Charles E. Coppa                   /s/ David A/ Barclay
Charles E. Coppa                       Agreed,
Chief Financial Officer                Mr. David A. Barclay
                                       Senior Vice President and General Counsel