### UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT MEMORANDUM

To: Public Information (MS 5030)

Plans Section, Office of Field Operations (MS 5231)

Public Information copy of DOCD

Control # - N-09627

Type - Initial Development Operations Coordinations Document

Lease(s) - OCS-G07957 Block - 762 Mississippi Canyon Area OCS-G07958 Block - 763 Mississippi Canyon Area OCS-G07962 Block - 806 Mississippi Canyon Area OCS-G07963 Block - 807 Mississippi Canyon Area OCS-G24112 Block - 805 Mississippi Canyon Area

Operator - Shell Offshore Inc.

Olympus TLP platform and Wells MB001 thru MB024, SD01, SD02,

WB01 thru WB04

PLATFORM

Attached is a copy of the subject plan for public comments on issues that

should be addressed in an Environmental Assessment.

It has been deemed submitted as of this date and is under review for approval.

Michelle Griffitt

Plan Coordinator

G07957/MC/762

G07963/MC/807

G07962/MC/806

G07963/MC/807

G07962/MC/806

G07957/MC/762

G07962/MC/806

G07958/MC/763

G07963/MC/807

G07958/MC/763

G07963/MC/807

G07958/MC/763

G07962/MC/806 7044 FNL, 344 FWL

7030 FNL, 285 FWL

7043 FNL, 319 FWL

7007 FNL, 318 FWL

7027 FNL, 332 FWL

7050 FNL, 300 FWL

7027 FNL, 307 FWL

7012 FNL, 346 FWL

6992 FNL, 357 FWL

6989 FNL, 379 FWL

7032 FNL, 360 FWL

7009 FNL, 393 FWL

7013 FNL, 371 FWL

7087 FNL, 325 FWL G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807

G07963/MC/807 TLP/OLYMPUS

WELL/MB001

WELL/MB002

WELL/MB003

WELL/MB004

WELL/MB005

WELL/MB006

WELL/MB007

WELL/MB008

WELL/MB009

WELL/MB010

WELL/MB011

WELL/MB012

WELL/MB013 Botm Lse/Area/Blk Surface Location Surf Lse/Area/Blk Site Type/Name Description -

Rig Type - Subject: From: June 4, 2012

### Shell Offshore Inc

P. O. Box 61933 New Orleans, LA 70161

- 1933 United States of America Tel +1 504 728 7215

Fax +1 504 728 0778 Email sylvia.bellone@shell.com

P ublic Information Copy

February 2 , 2012

Ms. Liz Peuler, Section Chief Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, LA 70123

- 2394

Attn: Plans Group MS 5231

SUBJECT: Initial Development Operations Coordination Document (DOCD)

OCS

- G 07957

, Mississippi Canyon Block 762

, OCS

- G 07958

, Mississippi Canyon Block 763

OCS

- G 24112

, Mississippi Canyon Block 805

, OCS

- G 07962

, Mississippi Canyon Block 806

OCS

- G 07963

, Mississippi Canyon Block 807

, Offshore Louisiana

Dear Ms. Peuler :

In compliance with 30 CFR 250.103 and NTLs 2008

- G04, 2006

- G14 and 2010

- N06, giving DOCD guidelines, Shell Offshore Inc. (SOI) requests your approval of this Initial DOCD to install a new Tension Leg Platform (TLP) and subsea production facility with tieback equipment, drill to total depth and complete and pr oduce

2 4 DVA wells and up to six subsea wells

. Installation work at this location is scheduled to begin as early as November 20, 2012.

The most recent approvals for DOCDs covering all of the above leases ( except MC 805 ) are Plan Control No.

R

- 04773 ap proved January 10, 2008 and R

- 04983 approved November 18, 2009. Drilling of the six subsea wells will be accomplished under approved EP S

- 07499 prior to TLP DVA drilling proposed in this plan.

The worst case discharge associated with this DOCD was also included in the update of the Regional Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP), submitted to BSEE on February 1, 2012 under separate cover.

This Plan consists of a series of attachments describing our intended operations. The attachments we desire

to be exempted from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act are marked “Confidential” and excluded from the Public Information Copies of this submittal.

A cost recovery fee of $ 27, 79 7.00 is attached to the proprietary copy of the plan.

Should you requi re additional information, please contact me as indicated above.

Sincerely,

Sylvia A. Bellone

# SHELL OFFSHORE INC.

Initial Development Operations Coordination Document

for

OCS

- G 07957, Mississippi Canyon Block 762

OCS

- G 07958, Mississippi Canyon Block 763

OCS

- G 24112, Mississippi Canyon Block 805

OCS

- G 07962, Mississippi Canyon Block 806

OCS

- G 07963, Mississippi Canyon Block 807

Offshore Louisiana



# PUBLIC INFORMATION COPY

PREPARED BY:



# Sylvia A. Bellone Sr. Regulatory Specialist

504.728.7215

Sylvia.bellone@shell.com

## REVISIONS TABLE

Date Requested Plan Section What Changed Date Resubmitted

2/15/2012 Section 1 Addtl information regarding TLP 2/17/2012

Section 2 A, E, F and K info

Section 9 OSRP comparison table

3/19/2012 Section 7

Section 18 Revised table 7A/7B

Section A.6 3/26/2012

### Initial Development Operations Coordination Document

OCS

- G 07957, Mississippi Canyon Block 762

OCS

- G 07958, Mississippi Canyon Block 763

OCS

- G 24112, Mississippi Canyon Block 805

OCS

- G 07962, Mississippi Canyon Block 806

OCS

- G 07963, Mississippi Canyon Block 807

Offshore Louisiana

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1 PLAN CONTENTS

SECTION 2 GENERAL INFORMATION

SECTION 3 GEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL

SECTION 4 HYDROGEN SULFIDE

- H 2 

### S

SECTION 5 MINERAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION

SECTION 6 BIOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION

SECTION 7 WASTE AND DISCHARGE INFORMATION

SECTION 8 AIR EMISSION INFORMATION

SECTION 9 OIL SPILL INFORMATION

SECTION 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

SECTION 11 LEASE STIPULATIONS

SECTION 12 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

SECTION 13 RELATED FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS INFORMATION

SECTION 14 SUPPORT VESSELS AND AIRCRAFT

SECTION 15 ONSHORE SUPPORT FACILITIES INFORMATION

SECTION 16 SULPHUR OPERATIONS

SECTION 17 COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT INFORMATION

SECTION 18 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

SECTION 19 AD MINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

### Acronyms and Abbreviations

ADIOS Automated Data Inquiry for Oil Spills

APD Application for Permit to Drill

ASI Airborne Support, Inc.

bbl barrels

BOEM Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

BOEMRE Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,

Regulation and Enforcement

BOP blowout preventers

BPD barrels per day (bbl/day)

BSEE Bureau of Safety and Environmental

Enforcement

CCA Clean Caribbean & Am ericas

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CGA Clean Gulf Associates

CH 4 

### methane

CO carbon monoxide

CO 2 

### carbon dioxide

CP Coastal Preserve

DOCD Development Operations Coordination

Document

DPS distinct population segment

EA Environmental Assessment

EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone

EFH Essential Fish Habitat

EIA Environmental Impact Analysis

EIS Environmental Impact Statement

EP Exploration Plan

ESA Endangered Species Act

FAD fish

- attracting device

GB Garden Banks

GC Green Canyon

GMFMC Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management

Council

H 2 

### S hydrogen sulfide

HAPC Habitat Area of Particular Concern

IPF impact

- producing fac tor

MARPOL International Convention for the

Prevention of Pollution from Ships

MC Mississippi Canyon

MMC Marine Mammal Commission

MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act

MMS Minerals Management Service

MSRC Marine Spill Response Corporation

MWCC Marine Well Containment Company

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act

NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service

NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration

NO 2 

### nitrogen dioxide

NO

x 

### nitrogen oxides

NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System

NPS National Park Service

NRC National Research Council

NTL Notice to Lessees and Operators

NWR National Wildlife Refuge

OCS Outer Continental Shelf

OCSLA Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act OSAT Operational Science Advisory Team

OSRA Oil Spill Risk Analysis

OSRL Oil Spill Response Limited

OSRP Oil Spill Response Plan

PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon

PM particulate matter

PSD Prevention of Significant Deterioration

ROV remotely operated vehicle

SEA Site

- Specific Environmental Assessment

SEP Supplemental Exploration Plan

SDOCD Supplemental Development Operations

Coordination Document

Shell Shell Offshore Inc.

SO

x 

### sulfur oxides

SO 2 

### sulfur dioxide

SP State Park

SWSS Sperm Whale Seismic Study

TLP tension leg platform

U.S.C. United States Code

USCG U.S. Coast Guard

USDOI U.S. Department of the Interior

USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

VOC volatile organic compound

USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

WCD worst case discharge

WCEP Whooping Crane Eastern Partner ship

WMA Wildlife Management Area

### SECTION 1: PLANS CONTENT

History of Development to Date

The Olympus Development will consist initially of a new 24 slot tension leg platform (TLP) and a six slot

subsea field tie back to the TLP.

The d rilling and completion of the six slot subsea tie back was previously covered under Initial Exploration Plan for MC 762, 805 and 806 Control No. N

- 09570 approved July 11, 2011. The 24 well batch set for the TLP and the drilling of the first well (MB 0 01) to total depth was previously approved under Supplemental Exploration Plan for MC 762, 763, 806 and 807 Control No. S

- 07499 approved November 22, 2011.

This i nitial DOCD will cover the installation of the subsea tieback including umbilicals, flowlines, manifold, plets, UTAs and flying leads necessary to produce the subsea wells , the drilling and completion of the other

2 4 DVA wells, and the installation of the 24 slot TLP and associated topside equipment necessary to produce

the DVA and subsea wells.

Shell‟s plan, as detailed in this DOCD, is to use a platform based drilling unit

, the Shell N 88

, or equivalent rig (the “r ig”), to complete the DVA wells which are located approximately 53 miles from the ne arest coastline (Louisiana), 91 miles from the supply base at Port Fourchon, Louisiana, and 82 miles from the helicopter

terminal at Boothville , Louisiana. Water depth at the well site surface location s is 3,030 feet. The schedule proposed in the following form BOEM

- 137 to drill and complete the wells is an estimate based on the best available information regarding downhole conditions likely to be encountered and is not intended to be a limitation. Installation of subsea equipment is planned to begin November 20, 2012 and will be accomplished

with a non

- anchored pipeline lay barge supported by tug boats, supply vessels and helicopters as detailed in

Section 14 of this DOCD.

The offshore installation of the Olympus TLP begins with Pile transportation and installation in Mississippi Canyon Block 807 in approximately 3030 ‟ of water. The 16 Piles are 96”O.D. and about 431 ‟ long. They will be driven in clusters of 4 at the four corners of the TLP foundation using a MHU

- 500T hammer of f the Installation Vessel similar to past Shell TLP installations.

Upon completion of the Pile Installation scope, 16 Tendons will be transported to the Olympus site for assembly and installation. Assembly of the Tendons consists of upending each section and arranging the section vertically using a platform off the side of the Installation Vessel. The make

- up of the Tendons includes a Bottom Section, multiple Main Body Sections and a Top Section. Each section is assembled using a connector similar to pa st Shell TLP Installations. The Tendons are connected to a specific Pile using a latching mechanism similar to past Shell TLP Installations. The Tendons each be free

- standing using Tendon Support Buoys, which are removed after the TLP is fully tensioned.

At approximately the seventh Tendon installation, the quayside integrated Hull and Topside will be wet towed from Corpus Christi to the Olympus Site. The inland tow will commence with two inland tugs as steering tugs breasted to the TLP, two offshore tugs as push tugs breasted to the TLP, two inland tugs as break tugs

connected with hold

- back lines to the TLP, an offshore tug as an escort leading the convoy and an offshore tug as an escort trailing the convoy. At the sea buoy, the four inland tugs wil l be released, three of the offshore tugs will be attached to the TLP and one offshore tug will travel as an escort.

The TLP will arrive at the Olympus Site and final preparations will begin for the connection to the Tendons. The four offshore tugs will connect to four sides of the TLP to position the TLP over the Tendons. The TLP

will commence ballast so that the Tendons will connect to the TLP then the ballast will be removed to create the required tension. The Flare Boom will be lifted and installed along with completions activities for the

Installation Contractor to remove installation aids

.

The TLP tendon piles and wellsite plat is included in this plan. The unlabeled red box symbols to the west and 2 places on north represent fut ure riser porches.

### The rig Shell plans to use for the well completion of the DVA wells is a platform based rig and is equipped with

state

- of

- the

- art drilling and well control equipment. The rig will comply with the requirements in the Interim

Final Rules. T he completion activities will be supported by the support vessels and aircraft as well as onshore support facilities as listed in Sections 14 and 15 of the DOCD. Shell has employed or contracted with trained personnel to carry out its exploration activiti es. Shell is committed to local hire, local contracting and local purchasing to the maximum extent possible. Shell personnel and contractors are experienced at operating in the Gulf of Mexico and are well versed in all Federal and State laws regulating o perations. Shell‟s employees and contractors share Shell‟s deep commitment to operating in a safe and environmentally responsible manner.

Shell, through its parent and affiliate corporations, has extensive experience safely developing for oil and gas in the Gulf of Mexico. Shell will draw upon this experience in organizing and carrying out its planned MC 807 completion program

. Shell believes that the best way to manage blowouts is to prevent them from happening. Significant effort goes into the design and execution of wells and into building and maintaining staff competence. In the unlikely event of a spill, Shell‟s Regional Oil Spill Response Plan ( OSRP ) is designed to contain and respond to a spill that meets or exceeds the WCD detailed in S ection 9 of this DOCD . The worst case discharge ( WCD ) does not take into account potential flow mitigating factors such as well bridging, obstructions in wellbore, reservoir barriers, or early intervention. Shell continue s to invest in Research and Development (R &D) to improve safety and reliability of our well systems. All operations will be conducted in accordance with applicable federal and state laws, regulations, and lease and permit requirements. Shell will have trained personnel and monitoring programs in place to ensure such compliance.

A. & B. Plan Information Form s and L ocation

 See attached BOEM 137 Plans Forms

 See attached Subsea layout drawings

 See attached Location plats

C. SAFETY AND POLLUTION FEATURES :

The r ig we plan to use, the Shell N 88 or similar

, will comply with all of the regulations of the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the United States Coast Guard (USCG). All drilling operations will be conducted under the provisions of 30 CFR, Part 250, Subp art D, and other applicable regulations and notices, including those regarding the avoidance of potential drilling hazards and safety and pollution prevention control. Such measures as inflow detection and well control, monitoring for loss of

circulation and seepage loss, and casing design will be our primary safety measures. Primary pollution prevention measures are contaminated and non

- contaminated drain system, mud drain system, and oily water processing.

The TLP, subsea facility, and lease term flowl ine system will have the following features:

 The production facility will have drip pans under hydrocarbon equipment to minimize the potential loss of fluids through grated openings. The facility will utilize an open drains system as the primary control of potential spills. Lube oil drains will be piped into a separate closed drain system. The deck open drain system is designed to collect and contain rainwater, runoff, and liquid spills in drip pan areas. It is operated as an atmospheric drain system. Drainage will be routed via segregated hazardous (flammable) and non

- hazardous deck drains systems. Hazardous drains go to an open drain Pre

- Sump (separator); separated water is routed to the Sump Caisson. Skimmed oil will be recovered and returned (pum ped) to the process. Non

- hazardous drains go directly to the Sump Caisson. All fluid containing vessels will have drain valves and drip pans to control and collect any potential spill as a result of maintenance activities. Roof drains (strictly rainwater) are piped directly overboard.

 Produced water will treated by hydrocyclone followed by flotation cell for overboard disposal. The design maximum dispersed oil in water specification is consistent with the statutory limit of less than 29mg/l but will endea vour to achieve a limit of 15 mg/l.

###  In the event of an emergency, the topsides facility has a blowdown and shut

- down system designed

to isolate and depressurize hydrocarbons in order to limit the amount of inventory exposed to the event. Upon fire or confirmed gas detection, emergency shutd own valves strategically located to isolate critical topsides equipment will isolate the process. The emergency shutdown system also de

energizes rotating equipment (compressors, pumps, etc.) which limits any discharges emanating from

these sources. If n ecessary a blowdown system can be activated to de

- pressure the topsides via the flare system and limit the gas inventory in process vessels. The blowdown is capable of depressuring the facility to 100 psi in 10 minutes.

 The hydrocarbon (diesel) storage tanks in the hull will have l evel indicators and high level switches designed to monitor and prevent overfill of the tanks during filling operations.

 Subsea equipment will be provided with pressure indicators to detect a n upset condition. Provision s have been made for installing remote ly operated valves at the tree and manifold capable of isolating each piece of equipment and limit the amount of a spill in the event of loss of containment.

 The oil and gas export pipelin es each have a departing valve located immediately downstream of the gas sales meters and oil sales pumps. The departing valves are remotely operated and tied to the emergency shutdown system

 The sewage collection and treatment system is designed to work efficiently at maximum occupancy
and comply with statutory regulations. Sewage will be treated in a USCG Type II marine sanitation
device and disposed into the sea. Provisions shall be incorpor ated to treat the sewage effluent through
a macerator with supplemental chlorine injection when the USCG Type II MSD is being serviced.

D. Storage Tanks/Production Vessels

Type of Storage

Tank Type of Facility Tank

Capacity (bbls) Number

of

Tanks Total

Capacity (bbls) Fluid

Gravity (API)

HP Production Separator Gas/Oil/Water Separation 160 1 160 30

Well Test/Unloading Separator Gas/Oil/Water Separation 170 1 170 30

Freewater Knockout Gas/Oil/Water Separation 1015 1 1015 30

Well Cleanup Slop

Tank Gas/Oil/Water Separation 250 1 250 30

Bulk Oil Treater Gas/Oil/Water Separation 1210 1 1210 30

Dry Oil Tank Oil Storage 1300 1 1300 30

Wet Oil Tank Gas/Oil Separation 545 1 545 30

Flare Scrubber Gas/Oil Separation 610 1 610 30

Helicopter Fuel Tank Helicopter Fuel Storage 31 3 93 35

Diesel Storage Tank Diesel Fuel Storage 1502 2 3005 35

E. Pollution Prevention Measures

In addition to the measures discussed in 1c, the gas and oil export pipelines will be fitted with a secondary isolation device to supplement the departing valves. These remotely operated valves will be located on the hull pontoons, directly upstream of th e stress joint. These secondary isolation valves will also be manually actuated, and will isolate the gas and oil export lines at this secondary location to limit the inventory which

### could reverse flow through the pipeline network back through the facilit y in the event of a leak downstream

of the primary departing isolation valve

.

DRAIN SYSTEM

Drains are provided on the platform rig in all spaces and on all decks where water or oil can accumulate. The drains are divided into two categories, non

- contamin ated and contaminated. All deck drains are fitted with a removable strainer plate that prevents debris from entering the system.

Deck d rainage from rainfall, rig washing, deck washing, and runoff from curbs and gutters, including drip pans and work areas , are discharged depending on if it comes in contact with the contaminated or non

contaminated areas of the platform rig.

1) Non

- contaminated Drains

Non

- contaminated drains are designated as drains that under normal circumstances do not contain hydrocarbons, and can be discharged directly overboard. These are mostly located around the main deck and outboard in places where it is unlikely that hydrocarbons will be found.

2) Contaminated Drains

Contaminated drains are designated as drains that contain hydrocarbons and cannot be discharged

overboard. We have two drains, one for oil contaminated water routed to the rig sump and one for clean

water which is routed overboard. In the areas where a sp illage of oily water or hydrocarbon is possible, t he operator will make the decision on where to route the spillage. Oil is routed to the drilling sump, other contaminates are cleaned up and placed in approved containers to be sent to shore for proper disp osal.

3) Mud Drain System

• Mud Pump Rooms

- have a vacuum system to collect mud from the pump room and either send it in for

reclamation or b e put back into the system. The room is a containment system and anything collected will be managed as deemed a ppropriate.

• Sack Storage Room

- This is a containment area. The drains can be routed to the sump. Normal condition for this area is plugged drains.

• Shale Shaker Room

- The shakers are on an open deck. The mud is contained and the drains from the deck are piped overboard.

4) Oily Water Processing (Drill Sump)

The oily water is initially routed to the Drill

- Sump. The tank has sufficient residence time to allow for natural separation of oil and water. The oil leg is manually drained to the Producti on sump after it has been tested for anything that will emulsify the oil and flip the system or other marine pollutants. The water leg in the separator is routed to the o verboard line.

The drill dump is a chambered weir system. The first chamber accepts the contaminated water through an inlet in the lower portion. This chamber allows any solids to fall out and the liquid weirs over the top to the second chamber. The second chamber is the largest and provides separation time. The clean water exits out

th e bottom of the chamber through a U

- Tube and goes overboard. The oil weirs over the top of the second chamber into the third and is pumped out to the production sump.

All discharges will be in accordance with applicable NPDES permits. See Section 18, EIA, Section C.1.2, Water Quality.

### Drain, Effluent and Waste Systems

• The platform r ig‟s drainage system is designed in line with Shell‟s environmental and s ingle point discharge policies.

• To prevent migration of hazardous materials and flammable gas from hazardous to non

- hazardous areas, the drainage systems are segregated.

• The platform r ig drainage systems potentially exposed to hydrocarbons tie into the rig sump to remove hydrocarbons that could harm the environment.

R ig Floor Dra inage

The platform r ig floor drains either go to the rig sump (if they are exposed to equipment or well bore fluids) or directly overboard for deck drainage.

Operating configurations are as follows:

• The overboard drilling \ completion fluid tank piping is double valved and normally locked closed.

• The d ril l s ump water overflow valve is normally opened.

• The waste oil pump is capable of pumping down the oily water collection tank to the off

- loading station (either to portable tote tanks or to sup ply vessel).

• The solids control system is capable of being isolated for cuttings collection.

F. Additional Measures

 HSE (health safety and environment) are the primary topics in pre

- tour and pre

- job safety meetings.

The discussion around no harm to people or environment is a key mindset. All personnel are reminded daily to inspect work areas for safety issues as well as potential pollution issues.

 All t ools that come to and from the r ig have their pollution pans inspected, cleaned and confirmation of plugs installed prior to leaving dock and prior to loading on the boat.

 Preventive Maintenance of r ig equipment includes visual inspection of hydraulic lines and reservoirs on

routine scheduled basis.

 All pollution pans on r ig are inspected daily.

 Co ntainment dikes are installed around all oil containment, drum storage areas, fuel vents, and fuel storage tanks.

 All used oil and fuel is collected and sent in for recycling.

 Every drain on the r ig is assigned a number on a checklist. The checklist is used daily to verify drain plugs are installed.

 All trash containers are checked and emptied daily. The trash containers are kept covered. Trash is disposed of in a compactor and shipped in via boat.

 The r ig is involved in a recycling program for card board, plastic, paper, glass, and aluminum.

 Fuel hoses and SBM are changed on annual basis.

 TODO spill prevention fittings are installed on all liquid take on hoses.

 Waste paint thinner is recycled on board with a solvent still to reduce hazard of shipp ing and storage.

 All equipment on board utilizes Envirorite hydraulic fluid as opposed to hydraulic oil.

###  Shell has obtained ISO14001 certification.

 Shell uses low sulfur fuel to reduce air pollutant impacts

.U. S. Department of the Interior OMB Control Number: 1010

- 0 151



### Bureau of Ocean Energy Management OMB Approval Expires: December 31, 20 1 4 

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM



### General Information

Type of OCS Plan: Exploration Plan (EP) X Development Operations Coordination Document (DOCD)

Company Name: Shell Offshore Inc BOEM Operator Number: 0689

Address: P. O. Box 61933 Contact Person: Sylvia Bellone

New Orleans, LA 70161

- 1933 Phone Number: (504) 728

- 7215

E

- Mail Address: sylvia.bellone@shell.com

Lease(s): OCS

- G 07957, 7958, 24112,

7962 & 7963 Area: MC Block(s): 762, 762, 805, 806 & 807 Project Name (If Applicable): Olympus

Objective(s): X Oil Gas Sulphur Salt Onshore Base:

Fouchon & Boothville Distance to Closest Land (Miles): 53



### Description of Proposed Activities (Mark all that apply)

Exploration drilling X Development drilling

X Well completion X Installation of production platform

Well test flaring (for more than 48 hours) X Installation of production facilities

Installation of caisson or platform as well protection

structure Installation of satellite structure

X Installation of subsea wellheads and/or manifolds X Commence production

X Installation of lease term pipelines Other (Specify and describe)

Have you submitted or do you plan to submit a Conservation Information Document to accompany this plan? X Yes No

Do you propose to use new or unusual technology to conduct your activities? Yes X No

Do you propose any facility that will serve as a host facility for deepwater subsea development? X Yes No

Do you propose any activities that may disturb an BOEM

- designated high

- probability archaeological

area? X Yes No

Have all of the surface locations of your proposed activities been previously reviewed and approved by

BOEM ? N

- 9570 approved 7/11/11 and S

- 7499 approved 11/22/11 X Yes No



### Tentative Schedule of Proposed Activities

Proposed Activity Start

Date End

Date No. of Days

See Next Page



### Description of Drilling Rig Description of Production Platform

Jackup Drillship Caisson X Tension leg platform

Gorilla Jackup X Platform rig Well protector Compliant tower

Semisubmersible Submersible Fixed platform Guyed tower

DP Semisubmersible Other (Attach Description) X Subsea manifold Floating production system

Drilling Rig Name (If Known): Shell N88 or similar Spar Other (Attach Description)



### Description of Lease Term Pipelines

From (Facility/Area/Block) To (Facility/Area/Block) Diameter (Inches) Length (Feet)



### MC 762 (W. Boreas) MC 807 (Olympus) 8.625” (2) 18,000’

MC 762 (W. Boreas well) MC 762 (W. Boreas Manifold) 6.625” ( 6 ) 71

- 100’

MC 762 (W. Boreas Manifold) MC 762 (W. Boreas FL PLET S ) 6.625” (2) 95

- 99’

FORM BOEM

- 137 (December 20 11

- Supersedes all previous editions of form BOEM

- 137 which may not be used.)

### Tentative Schedule of Proposed Activities *

Proposed Activity Start Date End Date No. of Days

West Boreas Flowline pre

- lay survey, transponder installation,

and mattress installation 11/20/12 12/20/12 30

West Boreas Flowlines and

Stress Joint Pre

- lay; Sled, Manifold & Sleeper Installation 2/13/2013 3/15/2013 30

Olympus TLP Offshore Installation (Piles, Tendons, Host) 5/28/2013 7/19/2013 52

Install Flowline Jumpers 6/24/2013 7/1/2013 7

Olympus TLP Offshore Hookup & Commissioning (incl West Boreas Subsea Commsg) 7/19/2013 10/30/2013 103

West Boreas Flowlines Recovery and Handoff to TLP 7/28/2013 8/2/2013 5

West Boreas Umbilicals

Installation 8/6/2013 8/9/2013 3

Install 2 Well Jumper s 9/24/2013 10/1/2013 7

Complete MB01 DVA well 10/1/2013 12/14/2013 74

1 st Production from W. Boreas

Subsea 11/01/2013 1

1 st Production from Olympus

TLP 12/15/2013 1

Drill and Complete 23 DVA

wells 12/15/2013 6/01/2024 3,821

Install well jumper 7/19/2014 7/26/14 7

Install well jumper 4/11/15 4/18/15 7

Install well jumper 5/21/15 5/28/15 7

Install well jumper 6/30/15 7/7/15 7



### *Note: These dates reflect our best estimate at this time for operations and associated vessel support utilization. The actual dates may change as the installation gets closer. Should the schedule change enough that the totals for yearly air emissions e stimates increase over those submitted, Shell will revise the plan to reflect the higher yearly emission totals.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB001( A ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7030 FNL

E/W Departure: 285 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,005

Y: 10,225,610

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.656"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.605"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entr y for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estimate tha t burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB002 ( B ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7043 FNL

E/W Departure: 319 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,039

Y: 10,225,597

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.533"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.227"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not

necessary )

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting

burden for this form i s included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to th e Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB007 ( C ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,012 FNL

E/W Departure: 346 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,066

Y: 10,225,628

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.846"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.932"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB004 ( D ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,027 FNL

E/W Departure: 332 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,052

Y: 10,225,613

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.689"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.079"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 3 0 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB 0 05 ( E ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,050 FNL

E/W Departure: 300 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,020

Y: 10,225,590

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.456"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.441"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the informa tion to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operatio ns Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gatheri ng and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of

Ocean Energy Management, 38 1 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB 0 06 ( F ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,027 FNL

E/W Departure: 307 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,027

Y: 10,225,613

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.693"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.359"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Doc uments. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Her ndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB003 ( G ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,007 FNL

E/W Departure: 318 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,038

Y: 10,225,633

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.890"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.244"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom o f Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1 ,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each propose d well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB008 ( H ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 6,992 FNL

E/W Departure: 357 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,077

Y: 10,225,648

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 36.043"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.817"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations

Coordination Document s ubmitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for prepa ring Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, includi ng the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB009 (I) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 6,989 FNL

E/W Departure: 379 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,099

Y: 10,225,651

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 36.079"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.570"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB010 ( J ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,032 FNL

E/W Departure: 360 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,080

Y: 10,225,608

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.646"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.767"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 3 0 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB011( K ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,009 FNL

E/W Departure: 393 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,113

Y: 10,225,631

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.879"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.406"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the informa tion to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operatio ns Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gatheri ng and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of

Ocean Energy Management, 38 1 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB012 ( L ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,013 FNL

E/W Departure: 371 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,091

Y: 10,225,627

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.843"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.652"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB013 ( M ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,087 FNL

E/W Departure: 325 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,045

Y: 10,225,553

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.096"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.145"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 3 0 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB014 ( N ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,080 FNL

E/W Departure: 345 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,065

Y: 10,225,560

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.173"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.931"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations

Coordination Document s ubmitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for prepa ring Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, includi ng the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB015 ( O ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,064 FNL

E/W Departure: 358 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,078

Y: 10,225,576

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.329"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.783"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB016 ( P ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,067 FNL

E/W Departure: 311 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,031

Y: 10,225,573

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.296"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.309"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 3 0 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB017 ( Q ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,044 FNL

E/W Departure: 344 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,064

Y: 10,225,596

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.529"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.948"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the informa tion to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operatio ns Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gatheri ng and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of

Ocean Energy Management, 38 1 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB018 ( R ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,063 FNL

E/W Departure: 333 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,053

Y: 10,225,577

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.333"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 21.063"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB019 ( S ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,049 FNL

E/W Departure: 372 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,092

Y: 10,225,591

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.486"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.636"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom o f Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1 ,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each propo sed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB020 ( T ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,029 FNL

E/W Departure: 382 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,102

Y: 10,225,611

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.682"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.521"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations

Coordination Document s ubmitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for prepa ring Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, includi ng the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB021 ( U ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,026 FNL

E/W Departure: 404 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,124

Y: 10,225,614

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.719"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.275"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entr y for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estimate tha t burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB022 ( V ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,069 FNL

E/W Departure: 386 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,106

Y: 10,225,571

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.286"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.471"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Informati on Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden est imate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB023 ( W ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7,046 FNL

E/W Departure: 419 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,139

Y: 10,225,594

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.519"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.110"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030



### Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge ( If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary) Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting

burden for this form i s included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to th e Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

Well MB024 ( X ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA Yes X No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7049 FNL

E/W Departure: 397 FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,117

Y: 10,225,591

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude

N 28° 09' 35.482"

Longitude

W 89° 14' 20.357"

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3030

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =

X = Y =



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and da ta entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a

cur rently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination

Documents. We estim ate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and complet ing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

SD

- 01 ( M ) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 9 7 6 .78 ’ FSL

E/W Departure: 1 44 8 .08 ' FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904328.08

Y: 10233616.78

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28° 10’5 2

. 195

Longitude

- 89° 17’ 7

. 198

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3140’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the inf ormation to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Oper ations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,

gat hering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of

Ocean Energy Management , 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

WB

- 01 (N) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 955.76’ FSL

E/W Departure: 1332.70 ' FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904212.7

Y: 10233595.76

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28° 10’51.966

Longitude

- 89° 17’ 8.482

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3140’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor Name

or No

. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of Anchor

Chain on Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 3 0 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

WB

- 02 (O) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 1104 .31 ’ FSL

E/W Departure: 135 1.90 .' FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904231.9

Y: 10233744.31

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28°10’53.44

Longitude

- 89°17’8.299

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3148’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according t o the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an acc ompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comment s regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

WB

- 03 (P) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 11 25.47 ’ FSL

E/W Departure: 14 77.33’ FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904357.33

Y: 10233765.47

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28°10’53.673

Longitude

- 89°17’6.902

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3145’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to f acilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of informati on unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordi nation Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and ma intaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden S treet, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

WB

- 04 (Q) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 11 54.05 ’ FSL

E/W Departure: 14 0 7 .7 ’ FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904287.7

Y: 10233794.05

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28°10’53.942

Longitude

- 89°17’7.686

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3145’

A nchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor

Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of

Anchor Chain on

Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations

Coordination Document s ubmitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Information Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for prepa ring Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, includi ng the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for each proposed well/structure



### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name):

SD

- 02 (R) Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: NA X Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07957

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 762

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 9 23.09 ’ FNL

E/W Departure: 14 00.21 ’ FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 904280.21

Y: 10233563.09

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28°10’51.655

Longitude

- 89°17’7.721

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 3152’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of Anchor

Chain on Seafloor



### Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to
inform you that BOEM collects this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations
Coordination Document submitted for BOEM approval. We use the information to facilitate our review and data entry for
OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Freedom of Informati on Act and 30 CFR 550.197. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting
burden for this form is included in the burden for preparing Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination
Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours
in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DOCD, including the time for reviewing instructions,
gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpart B. Direct comments
regarding the burden est imate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of
Ocean Energy Management, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.

### OCS PLAN INFORMATION FORM (CONTINUED) Include one copy of this page for eac h proposed well/structure


### Proposed Well/Structure Location

Well or Structure Name/Number (If renaming well or structure, reference previous name): Olympus (Mars B) TLP Subsea Completion

Anchor Radius (if applicable) in feet: see below Yes No

Surface Location Bottom

- Hole Location (For Wells)

Lease No. OCS

- G 07963

Area Name Mississippi Canyon

Block No. 807

Blockline Departures (in feet) N/S Departure: 7044’ FNL

E/W Departure: 344’ FWL

Lambert X

- Y

coordinates X: 919,072

Y: 10,225,602

Latitude/ Longitude Latitude 28° 09 ’ 35.59’’

Longitude

- 89°1 4 ’ 20.86’’

TVD (Feet): MD (Feet): Water Depth (Feet): 303 0 ’

Anchor Locations for Drilling Rig or Construction Barge (If anchor radius supplied above, not necessary)

Anchor Name

or No. Area Block X Coordinate Y Coordinate Length of Anchor

Chain on Seafloor

P1 MC 807 919,071.40 10,225,815.21 N/A

P 2 MC 807 919,095.16 10,225,825.62 N/A

P 3 MC 807 919,126.70 10,225,819.89 N/A

P 4 MC 807 919,145.58 10,225,802.02 N/A

P 5 MC 807 919,285.07 10,225,602.60 N/A

P 6 MC 807 919,295.60 10,225,579.01 N/A

P 7 MC 807 919,290.03 10,225,547.29 N/A

P 8 MC 807 919,272.15 10,225,528.51 N/A

P 9 MC 807 919,072.72 10,225,388.89 N/A

P 10 MC 807 919,049.00 10,225,378.41 N/A

P1 1 MC 807 919,017.27 10,225,383.95 N/A

P1 2 MC 807 918,998.50 10,225,401.84 N/A

P1 3 MC 807 918,858.92 10,225,601.39 N/A

P1 4 MC 807 918,848.53 10,225,625.11 N/A

P1 5 MC 807 918,854.02 10,225,656.86 N/A

P1 6 MC 807 918,871.98 10,225,675.43 N/A

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Statement: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires us to inform you that BOEM collects
this information as part of an applicant’s Exploration Plan or Development Operations Coordination Document s ubmitted for BOEM approval. We use
the information to facilitate our review and data entry for OCS plans. We will protect proprietary data according to the Fre edom of Information Act and
30 CFR 550.197. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget Control Number. The use of this form is voluntary. The public reporting burde n for this form is included
in the burden for prepa ring Exploration Plans and Development Operations Coordination Documents. We estimate that burden to average 600 hours per response, or 640 with an accompanying EP (1,000 hours in AKOCSR), or 690 (1,700 in AKOCSR) with an accompanying DPP or DO CD, includi ng the
time for reviewing instructions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the forms associated with subpa rt B. Direct comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this form to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management,
381 Elden Street, Herndon, VA 20170.) ) ) ) ) )



### S H E L L
B L K

. 8 0 5
O C S

- G 2 4 1 1 2 S H E L L E T A L
B L K

. 8 0 6
O C S

- G 0 7 9 6 2 S H E L L E T A L

B L K

. 7 6 2
O C S

- G 0 7 9 5 7 L L O G

B L K

. 7 6 1
O C S

- G 2 8 0 2 5

3 1 5 0 

### 3

1

5

0 3

1 5

0

3 1 0 0 

### 3

1

0

0 3 1 0 0



### 3 2

0

0 3

2

0

0 

### 3

2

0

0

3 2

5

0

3 3 0 0 3 0 0 0

3 3 5 0



## 3

4 0 0 3 0 5 0 3 0 5 0



### 3 4

5

0 3 0 5 0

W B

- 2 W B

- 4

W B

- 3

S D

- 1

S D

- 2 W B

- 1X=902,880



### Y = 1 0

, 2 3 2

, 6 4 0



# M i s s i s s i p p i C a n y o n B l o c k 7 6 2

O C S

- G 0 7 9 5 7

S u r f

a c e W e l l L o c a t i o n s W i t h B a t h y m e t r y 

# 3 P r o

j e c t i o n : N A D

_ 1 9 2 7

_ U T M

_ Z o n e

_ 1 6 N

L i n e a r U n i t : F o o t

_ U S 

### S h e l l E x p l o r a t i o n a n d P r o d u c t i o n C o

.

0 2

, 0 0 0 4

, 0 0 0 6

, 0 0 0 1

, 0 0 0
F e e t ) S u r f a c e L o c a t i o n s

W B

- 1 X = 9 0 4

, 2 1 2

. 7 0 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 5 9 5

. 7 6 ' 9 5 5

. 7 6 ' F S L 1 3 3 2

. 7 0 ' F W L

W B

- 2 X = 9 0 4

, 2 3 1

. 9 0 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 7 4 4

. 3 1 ' 1 1 0 4

. 3 1 ' F S L 1 3 5 1

. 9 0 ' F W L

W B

- 3 X = 9 0 4

, 3 5 7

. 3 3 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 7 6 5

. 4 7 ' 1 1 2 5

. 4 7 ' F S L 1 4 7 7

. 3 3 ' F W L

W B

- 4 X = 9 0 4

, 2 8 7

. 7 0 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 7 9 4

. 0 5 ' 1 1 5 4

. 0 5 ' F S L 1 4 0 7

. 7 0 ' F W L

S D

- 1 X = 9 0 4

, 3 2 8

. 0 8 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 6 1 6

. 7 8 ' 9 7 6

. 7 8 ' F S L 1 4 4 8

. 0 8 ' F W L

S D

- 2 X = 9 0 4

, 2 8 0

. 2 1 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 3 3

, 5 6 3

. 0 9 ' 9 2 3

. 0 9 ' F S L 1 4 0 0

. 2 1 ' F W L

G : \ 3 0

_ P r o j e c t \ C A D

_ N e w O r l e a n s \ M a p s \ P e r m i t P l a t s \ M a r s B \ M a r s B D O C D S u r f a c e W e l l s w i t h B a t h y m e t r y

. m x d

### " )

" ) " )

" )

" ) " ) " ) " ) " )

" ) " ) " )

" ) " ) " ) " ) " )

" ) " ) " ) " )

" ) " ) " ) A

B G

D

E F C H I

J K

L

M N O P Q

R S T U

V W

X



# M i s s i s s i p p i C a n y o n B l o c k 8 0 7

O C S

- G 0 7 9 6 3

P r o p o s e d S u r f a c e L o c a t i o n s

o f a l l O l y m p u s W e l l s 

# 3

S h e l l E x p l o r a t i o n a n d P r o d u c t i o n C o

. 7 0 8 0 '

7 1 0 0

7 1 2 0 ' 7 0 6 0 ' 7 0 4 0 ' 7 0 2 0 ' 7 0 0 0 ' 6 9 8 0 ' 6 9 6 0 '

3 0 0 ' 2 8 0 ' 3 2 0 ' 3 4 0 ' 3 6 0 ' 3 8 0 ' 4 0 0 ' 4 2 0 '



## D i s t a n c e f r o m W e s t L i n e o f M C 8 0 7 D i s t a n c e f r o m N o r t h L i n e o f M C 8 0 7

0 2 0 4 0 6 0 1 0
F e e t M B

- 1

M B

- 2

M B

- 3

M B

- 4

M B

- 5

M B

- 6

M B

- 7

M B

- 8

M B

- 9

M B

- 1 0

M B

- 1 1

M B

- 1 2

M B

- 1 3

M B

- 1 4

M B

- 1 5

M B

- 1 6

M B

- 1 7

M B

- 1 8

M B

- 1 9

M B

- 2 0

M B

- 2 1

M B

- 2 2

M B

- 2 3

M B

- 2 4 A

B

G

D

E

F

C

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P
Q

R

S

T

U

V

W

X X = 9 1 9

, 0 0 5 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 3 9 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 3 8 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 5 2 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 2 0 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 2 7 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 6 6 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 7 7 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 9 9 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 8 0 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 1 3 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 9 1 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 4 5 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 6 5 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 7 8 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 3 1 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 6 4 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 5 3 '

X = 9 1 9

, 0 9 2 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 0 2 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 2 4 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 0 6 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 3 9 '

X = 9 1 9

, 1 1 7 ' Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 1 0 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 7 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 3 3 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 1 3 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 0 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 1 3 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 2 8 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 4 8 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 5 1 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 0 8 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 3 1 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 2 7 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 5 3 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 6 0 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 7 6 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 7 3 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 6 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 7 7 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 1 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 1 1 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 6 1 4 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 7 1 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 4 '

Y = 1 0

, 2 2 5

, 5 9 1 ' O r i g i n a l M a r s B /

O l y m p u s W e l l N a m e B O E M N a m e x / y c o o r d i n a t e s ( U T M 3 1 6 )

G : \ 3 0

_ P r o j e c t \ C A D

_ N e w O r l e a n s \ M a p s \ P e r m i t P l a t s \ M a r s B \ M a r s B P r o p o s e d S u r f a c e L o c a t i o n s

. m x d

### SECTION 2: GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Application and Permits

There are no individual or site

- specific permits other than general NPDES Permit and rig move notification that need to be

obtained.

B. Drilling Fluids

See Section 7, Table 7A for a list of drilling fluids to be used



## .

C. Production

Olympus TLP:

Type Type Average Production Rate Peak Production Rate Life of R eservoir

Reservoir

Oil

Gas

We s t Boreas/South Deimos Subsea:

Type Type Average Production Rate Peak Production Rate Life of Reservoir

Reservoir

Oil

Gas

D. Oil Characteristics

Provide the estimated chemical and physical characteristics of the oils that will be handled, stored, or transported on/by the facility.

Oil properties from 4 representative sands are listed, including

(1) W3 Gold sand, deep Mars; (2) N/O Yello w, Middle Mars; (3) E2 Pink, Shallow Mars; (4) Aluminum, West Boreas

Provide the estimated chemical and physical characteristics of the oils that will be handled, stored, or transported on/by th e facility.

Characteristic Analytical Methodologies Should Be Compatible With: 1. Gravity (API) 24 / 28.5/ 17.3/27.7 ASTM D4052 2. Flash Point (oC) N/A ASTM D93/IP 34 3. Pour Point (oC)

- 29 /

- 1 / <

- 18/

- 6.7 ASTM D97 4. Viscosity (Centipoise at 25 o 

### C) na/ 28 cp@ 16C /72 cp@26C / 47.4 cp@ 16C ASTM D445

5. Wax Content (wt %) 0.78/0.16/0.66/1.25 Precipitate with 2

- butanon/dichloromethane (1 to 1 volume) at

- 10 o 

### C 6. Asphaltene Content (wt %) IP

- Method 143/84 7. Resin Content (wt %) Jokuty et al., 1996 8. Boiling point distribution including, for each fraction, the percent volume or weight and

the boiling point range in o 

### C ASTM D2892 (TBP distillation) or ASTM D2887/5307

9. Sulphur (wt %) 2.74/2.05/2.71/2.04 ASTM D4294

### Note: If the distillation information in Item No. 8 in the above table is not available, the GOMR may accept the following information in lieu of Items Nos. 5, 6, 7, and 8: weight percent total of saturates, aromatics, waxes, asphaltenes, and resins; and total BTEX (ppm) using analytical methods compatible with the Hydrocarbon Groups methodology found in Jokuty et al., 1996.

All in wt% Topped Basis

SARA (Topped Basis) All in wt %

Well # S and Saturates Aromatics Resin Asphaltenes

OCS

- G

- 07957 MC762

- 1 BP3 W3 24.8 49.0 14.7 11.5

OCS

- G

- 07957 MC762

- 1 BP3 W3 23.9 46.6 13.3 16.3

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 2 N/O 31.5 51.2 15.0 2.30

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A4

- ST N/O 30.8 51.8 15.1 2.20

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 3 N/O 35.1 51.3 11.9 1.70

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 6 N/O 34.3 50.4 12.6 2.75

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 17 N/O 38.1 51.1 9.2 1.58

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 21 N/O 35.3 52.6 9.7 2.41

OCS

- G

- 07963 MC 807 A

- 1 E2 21.0 61.6 14.0 3.42

OCS

- G

- 07957 MC 762 #3 ST1 BP1 ALU. 34.3 48.5 11.7 5.5

OCS

- G

- 07957 MC 762 #3 ST1 BP1 ALU. 32.8 50.7 12.5 4.0

OCS

- G

- 07957 MC 762 #3 ST1 BP1 ALU. 32.4 50.7 12.0 5.0

Oil from one well Oil from more than one well sampled on a facility Oil from a pipeline system

·Area/Block

-

· BOEM platform

·API Well No. ·Completion perforation

interval

· BOEM ‟s reservoir name ·Sample date ·Sample No.(if more than one is taken) ·Area/Block

- S ee Tables Below



### · BOEM platform ID ·Field/Unit ·Sample date ·Sample No. (if more than one is taken) ·Listing of API Well Nos. ·Storage tank ID No. (if sampled at a s torage tank) ·Pipeline segment number ·For each pipeline that feeds into the system, the ID codes for the closest upstream LACT units and/or facility measurement points ·Storage tank ID No. (if sampled at a storage tank)



### Sample Detail :

Area/Block MC762 MC762 MC 807 MC762 MC762 MC762

BOEM Platform OCS

- G

07957

#1BP3 OCS

- G

07957

#1BP3 OCS

- G

07963 A1 OCS

- G

07957 #3

ST1BP1 OCS

- G

07957 #3

ST1BP1 OCS

- G

- 07957

#3 ST1BP1

API Well No 6081741008

03 6081741008

03 6081740460

01 6081741033

02 6081741033

02 608174103302

Completion

Perforation 22233 ft MD 22290 ft MD 13223 ft MD 21648 ft MD 21713 ft MD 21790 ft MD

BOEM Reservoir

Name W3 (Gold) W3 (Gold) E2 (Pink) ALUMINIUM ALUMINIUM ALUMINIUM

### Sample Date 15

- May

2003 15

- May

2003 1

- May

- 1997 5

- April

- 2009 5

- April

- 2009 5

- April

- 2009

Sample No NG

- O

- 4388A NG

- O

- 4393A NG

- O

- 1433A NG

- O

- 6046A NG

- O

- 6039A NG

- O

- 6036A

Area/Block MC 807 MC 807 MC 807 MC 807 MC 807 MC 807

BOEM

Platform OCS

- G

07963 A2 OCS

- G

- 07963

A4

- ST OCS

- G

- 07963

A3 OCS

- G

- 07963

A6 OCS

- G

- 07963

A17 OCS

- G

- 07963

A21

API Well No 6081740465

00 60817404670

0 60817404660

0 60817404770

0 60817404920

0 60817404880

0 Completion

Perforation 17200

-

17340 ft MD 18476

- 18610

ft MD 17335

- 17450

ft MD 21740

- 21930

ft MD 17774

- 17910

ft MD 18500

- 18630

ft MD

BOEM

Reservoir

Name O (Lower

Yellow) O (Lower

Yellow) N (Upper

Yellow) N (Upper

Yellow) O (Lower

Yellow) O (Lower

Yellow)

Sample

Date 15

- Jan

- 1997 15

- Jan

- 1997 21

- May

- 1997 29

- Aug

- 1997 10

- Feb

- 1999 10

- Feb

- 1999

Sample No NG

- O

- 1332A NG

- O

- 1333A NG

- O

- 1435A NG

- O

- 1495A NG

- O

- 1996A NG

- O

- 1998A

E. New Or Unusual Technology

Shell is not proposing to use new or unusual technology as defined in 30 CFR 250.200 to carry out the proposed activities in

this SDOCD

.

F. Bonding

The bond requirement for the activities proposed in this SDOCD are satisfied by an area

- wide bond furnished and

maintained according to 30 CFR Part 256 , S ubpart I

- Bonding ; NTL No. 2000

- G16

, “ Guideline for General Lease Surety

Bonds” and National NTL No. 2008

- N07 , “Supplemental Bond Proc ed ures.”

G

. Oil Spill Financial Responsibility (OSFR)

Shell Offshore Inc. (SOI), BOEM Operator Number 0689, has demonstrated oil spill financial responsibility for the facilities proposed in this DOCD according to 30 CFR 253, and NTL No. 99

- N01, “Guidelines for Oil Spill Finan cial Responsibility for

Covered Facilities.”

H. Deepwater well control statement

Shell Offshore Inc. (SOI), BOEM Operator Number 0689, has the financial capability to drill a relief well and conduct other emergency well control operations.

J. Blowout scenario

Summary

This Section 2j was prepared by Shell Offshore Inc. (Shell) pursuant to the guidance provided in the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement‟s (BOEM) Notice to Lessees (NTL) No. 2010

- N06 with respect to

blowout an d worst case discharge scenario descriptions . Shell intends to comply with all applicable laws, regulations,

rules and Notices to Lessees.

Shell focuses on an integrated, three

- pronged approach to a blowout, including prevention, intervention /containment, and recovery.

### 1. Shell believes that the best way to manage blowouts is to prevent them from happening. Significant effort goes

into des ign and execution of wells and into building and maintaining staff competence. Shell continues to invest
independently in Research and Development (R&D) to improve safety and reliability of our well systems.

2. Shell is a founding member of the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC), which provides robust well
containment (shut

- in and controlled flow) capabilities. Additionally, Shell is investing in R&D to improve

containment systems.

3. As outlined in Shell‟s Oil Spill Response Plan (OSRP), and detailed in EP Section 9a (ii), Shell has contracts with
Oil Spill Removal Organizations (OSROs) to provide the resources necessary to respond to this Worst Case
Discharge (WCD) scenario. The capabilities for on

- water recovery, aerial and subsea dispersant application , in

situ burning, and nighttime monitoring and tracking have been significantly increased.

The DOCD WCD blowout scenario is calculated for the MB

- 001 penetration of the W3.0 Gold Sand and based on the guidelines outlined in NTL No. 2010

- N06 and subsequent Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

. Shell‟s Regional OSRP (updated to reflect this well ) is based on MC

- 762 A (Olympus MB

- 001) as the Worst Case Discharge well. In this scenario, the MB

- 001 well is drilled with the Olympus DVA rig, has a worst case discha rge volume estimate of 446,000 bbls for the first day, and has a first 30

- day average daily rate estimate of 359,500 bbls

. The MB

- 001 penetration is relatively close to the W3.0 Gold reservoir‟s oil water contact, and under WCD flow, it is expected to pr oduce water within the first 30 days; thus reducing the 30

- day average WCD volume. Shell‟s Regional OSRP has response capabilities based

on the first 30

- day average daily rate; thus in the unlikely event of a spill, Shell‟s Regional OSRP is designed to c ontain and respond to a spill that meets or exceeds this WCD.

The MB

- 001 well was also the well which was used to estimate the WCD in the previously approved Mars Supplemental

EP , MC 807, Plan S

- 0 7499. However the WCD blow out scenario outlined in Plan S

- 0 7499 is modeled to occur while the

MB

- 001 is being drilled from a MODU drill ship (Noble Bully One), while in this DOCD WCD scenario, the blowout occurs

while the MB

- 001 is being drilled by the Olympus DVA rig. Under this scenario, due to timing and sched uling constraints,

the MB

- 001 will most likely not be drilled from the Noble Bully One and hence drilled from the Olympus DVA rig once the TLP has been installed on site. The first day WCD volume estimates from the Bully One and Olympus DVA rig blowout

sc enarios are 465,000 bopd and 446,000 bopd, respectively. The wells have essentially the same plan and design. The differences in the WCD volumes can be attributed to the WCD estimate from the Noble Bully One (subsea BOP‟s) modeled at the seafloor, while the Olympus DVA Rig‟s is modeled to the rig floor (surface BOP‟s).

The WCD scenario, in terms of both initial and the sustained rates, has a low probability of being realized. Some of the factors that are likely to reduce rates and volumes, and are not included in the WCD calculation, include but are not limited to, obstructions or equipment in the wellbore, well bridging, and early intervention, such as containment capabilities.

Uncontrolled blowout (volume first day) 446,000 bbls

Uncontrolled blowo ut rate (first 30

- days average daily rate) 359, 5 00 bbls Duration of flow (days) based on relief well 182 days

Total volume of spill (bbls) for 182 days 25.5 MMBO

Table 1 Worst Case Discharge Summary

Mars B Project Overview

The Olympus Tension Leg Platform (TLP) will be located in the Mars Ursa Basin and represents an additional and continued development of the Mars Field. The Olympus TLP includes the installation of 24 well slots. The DOCD which accompanies this 2010

- N 06 document covers drilling all of the proposed 24 well paths and six (6) subsea wells . Based on the proposed well paths, open

- hole intervals, and targets, the 32 well paths were assessed for their WCD potential. The through

- salt Deimos W3.0 Gold well (MB

- 0 01) was determined to be the Olympus well with the highest individual WCD potential.

### The proposed Olympus TLP will be the second TLP in the Mars Field and is located approximately 53 miles east

- southeast of the nearest shoreline in the Gulf of Mexico (G OM), in water depths of approximately 3,030 feet (ft).

The history of the Mars Field began with the acquisition of the exploration leases between 1985 and 1988. The discovery well (MC

- 763 #1) and its appraisal by

- passes were drilled in 1989. The discov ery well was followed by appraisal wells (MC

- 807 #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, and MC

- 806 #1), and associated by

- passes and sidetracks between 1989 and 1991. The Mars A TLP was installed and brought onto production in 1996. The Mars field encompasses six OCS Leases in the Mississippi Canyon Area

– Blocks 762, 763, 806, 807, 850 and 851; that are captured within the Mars Operating Unit.

The Deimos Field is essentially „deep Mars‟, with reservoirs located below the deepest Mars production (Terra Cotta) in a sub

- salt environment. The Deimos discovery well was drilled in 2002, with the Phase I development (three well subsea tie

- back to the Mars A TLP) coming on production in July 2007.

The Mars Field (including Deimos) is comprised of a thick sequence of stac ked Plio

- Miocene turbidite deposits trapped

within the salt

- flanked Mars

- Ursa mini

- basin. The Mars Field comprises of more than 70 individual reservoirs stacked in a 10,000 foot sequence.

These reservoirs include:

 Sub

- salt reservoirs added to the fiel d with the 2002 Deimos discovery.

 Six large

- scale, laterally extensive and well connected reservoirs in the above

- salt section which
form the targets for the current Mars A waterflood activity.

 A large number of generally shallower and smaller

- scale deplet ion drive reservoirs.

The MB

- 001 well targets the W3.0 Gold reservoir. The W3.0 Gold is the principal component of the Gold reservoir, occurring at tvdss depths typically ranging from 20,200ft to 20,600ft within the deep reservoir fault block. It comprise s a widespread, large

- scale, high net

- to

- gross, amalgamated sand body, ranging from ~150ft to 250ft in true vertical thickness. The structural interpretation of the W3.0 Gold, together with the OWC observed at 20,442ft (tvdss) indicate

that recoverable vo lumes are largely restricted to the up

- dip crestal portion of the deep reservoir fault block structure.

The MB

- 001 well will target the up

- dip or crestal area of the deep reservoir fault block. In more down

- dip areas of the field, the W3.0 Gold is interp reted to be laterally extensive, wet, more heterogeneous and displays systematic upward

fining grain size trend. The W3.0 Gold reservoir is expected to include a large aquifer.

Detailed reservoir models have been constructed for all of the main Mars and Deimos reservoir horizons. The static reservoir models have been constructed using the full suite of subsurface data collected during the evaluation of these

Mars and Deimos well s, and these have subsequently been converted to dynamic simulation models for history matching and development planning and forecasting.

Shell‟s seismic interpretation used for constructing the Deimos W3.0 Gold reservoir model is based on high quality anisotropic ocean bottom nodes

- wide azimuth (OBS WAZ) seismic survey. A seismic profile through the proposed MB

001 well target is included as attachment K . This survey has an excellent well tie to the relevant offset well penetrations, thus giving a h igh confidence interpretation. The seismic interpretation was used for constructing the structure and stratigraphic framework of the model. Due to the excellent seismic to well ties, the amplitude extraction maps were

correlated to the reservoir charact eristics of each well and extrapolated across the entire area of the W3.0 Gold sand in the basin. These seismic extraction maps were then imported into Petrel for construction of the deterministic W3.0 Gold

static reservoir model. The static model was then used to construct a MBAL/Pro s per model for reservoir simulation. The

MB

- 001 well target was simulated in this MBAL/Prosper model. Therefore the resulting WCD calculation included in this document is based on the reservoir properties indicated from t he reservoir model at the target location. This document is a summary of the results of this modelling. Electronic copies of the reservoir model and its output can be provided to the BOEM upon request.

For the Deimos W3.0 Gold WCD scenario, the model c onsidered the maximum reservoir drainage area with no internal fault sealing or baffling incorporated and the aquifer extent modelled as per the expectation extent and magnitude.

### 1) Purpose Pursuant with 30 CFR 250.213(g), 250.219, 250.250, and NTL No. 2010

- N06, this document provides a blowout scenario description, further information regarding any potential oil spill, the assumptions and calculations used to determine the WCD and the measures taken to 1) enhance the ability to prevent a blowout and 2) respond and manage a blowout scenario if it were to occur. These calculations are based on best technical estimates of subsurface parameters that are derived from the offset wells, and seismic. These parameters are better than or consistent with the estim ates used by Shell to justify the investment. Therefore, these assumed parameters were used to calculate the WCD. They do not reflect probabilistic estimates.

2) Background

This attachment has been developed to document the additional information requir ements for Development Operations Coordination Documents (DOCD) as requested by NTL No. 2010

- N06 in response to the explosion and sinking of the Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU) Deepwater Horizon and the resulting subsea well blowout and recovery opera tions of the exploration well at the MC

- 252 Macondo location.

3) Information Requirements

a) Blowout scenario

All locations of the proposed Mars B DOCD supplement were assessed for Worst Case Discharge. The MB

- 001 well represented the highest 30

- day av erage flow potential. The MB

- 001 well will be drilled to the W3.0 Gold Sand as described above using the Olympus TLP DVA rig with a surface BOP. A hydrocarbon influx and a well control event are modeled to occur from the W3.0 Gold Sand during a trip out of the hole. The simulated blowout model results in unrestricted flow from the well at the surface which represents the worst case discharge, no restrictions in the wellbore, failure/loss of the subsea BOP, and a blowout to the surface.

b) Estimated flo w rate of the potential blowout

Category DOCD

Type of Activity Drilling

Facility Location (area/block) MC

- 807

Facility Designation Olympus TLP Drilling Rig
Distance to Nearest Shoreline (miles) 53 Statute miles

Uncontrolled blowout (volume first day) 446,000 bbls

Uncontrolled blowout rate (first 30

- days average daily rate) 359, 5 00 bbls

Table 2 Estimated Flow Rates of a Potential Blowout

c) Total volume and maximum duration of the potential blowout

Duration of flow (days) 182 days total duration to drill relief well (including 14 days to mobilize rig)

Total volume of spill (bbls) 25.5 MMBO Note: based on MBAL/Prosper Model

Table 3 Estimated Duration and Volume of a Potential Blowout

There is usually a decline in the discharge rate as time proceeds, which is illustrated by the differences between

the first 24

- hour volume and 30

- day average rate. The total volume calculated until a well is killed in a potential

blowout further demonstra tes this decline. At very short times, e.g. during the first 24 hours, the pressure profile in the reservoir changes from the moment when a well first starts flowing to a pseudo

- steady state pressure

### profile with time, and as a result the rate declines. At somewhat longer time scales, effects such as reservoir

voidage and the impact of boundaries can cause the rate to drop continuously with production. Simulation and

material balance models can include these effects and form the basis of the NTL No. 2010

- N0 6 estimates for 24

- hour and 30

- day rates as well as maximum duration volumes.

d) Assumptions and calculations used in determining the worst case discharge (Proprietary)

e) Potential for the well to bridge over

Mechanical failure/collapse of the borehole in a blowout scenario is influenced by several factors including in

- situ stress, rock strength and fluid velocities at the sand face. Based on the nodal analysis and reservoir simulation models outlined above, a surface blowout would create a high drawdown at the sand face. Given the substantial fluid velocities inherent in the worst case discharge, and the scenario as defined where the formation is not supported by a cased and cemented wellbore, it is possible that the borehole may fail/collapse/ bridge over within the span of a few days, significantly reducing outflow rates. However, this WCD scenario does not include any bridging or consideration of solids production with the oil and gas.

f) Likelihood for intervention to stop the blowout.

S afety of operations is our top priority. Maintaining well control at all times to prevent a blowout is the key focus of our operations. Our safe drilling record is based on our robust standards, conservative well design, prudent operations practices, compe tency of personnel, and strong HSE focus. Collectively, these constitute a robust system making blowouts extremely rare events.

Intervention Devices: Notwithstanding these facts, the main scenario for recovery from a blowout event is via intervention with the BOP attached to the well. There are built in redundancies in the BOP system to allow activation of selected components with the intent to seal of f the well bore. As a minimum, the Shell contracted rig fleet in the GOM will have redundancies meeting the Interium Final Drilling Safety Rule with respect to Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) hot stab capabilities, a deadman system, and an autoshear system

.

The potential for surface intervention on the Olympus TLP depends greatly on the nature of the breach, the flow volume, and to a lesser degree, whether the well flowed predominantly oil or gas. A relatively small leak could probably be managed in sever al different ways. Larger flows would certainly provide a greater challenge, but could be handled, particularly if the flow could be diverted away from the work area. In the event of uncontrolled flow from a Olympus TLP well, the facility would most like ly be evacuated. If the structure is erect, the feasibility of reentering the facility would need to be assessed due to the volatile nature of the situation. In the event that surface intervention is possible, the Shell Well Control Contingency Plan (WCC P) document would be utilized to coordinate relief planning.

Containment: The experience of gaining control over the Macondo well has resulted in a better understanding

of the necessary equipment and systems for well containment. As a result, industry and government are better equipped and prepared today to contain an oil well blowout in deepwater (See page 17 of the Decision Memorandum dated October 1, 2010). Shell is further analyzing these advances and incorporating them into its comprehensive approach to help prevent and, if needed, control another deepwater control incident.

Shell is a founding member of the Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC), which provides robust well containment (shut

- in and controlled flow) capabilities. Pursuant to NTL No. 2010

- N10, Shell will provide additional information regarding our containment capabilities in a subsequent filing.

g) Availability of a rig to drill a relief well and rig package constraints

Blowout intervention can be conducted from the existing drilling rig or from another drilling rig. Shell has an active portfolio of well operations in the GOM which will be supported by a total of four to six MODU rigs in 201 2

– 2015 timeframe. The dynamically positioned rigs under contract, the Noble Danny A dkins and the Noble Bully 1, will be the preferred rigs for blowout intervention work. However, moored rigs can also be used in some scenarios. Additionally, in the event of a blowout, there is the distinct possibility that other non

- contracted rigs in

the GOM could be utilized whether for increased expediency or better suitability. All efforts will be made at the

### time to secure the appropriate rig. Shell‟s current contracted rigs capable of operating at these water depths and

reservoir depths without tec hnical constraints are in the following table:

Rig Name Rig Type Deepwater Nautilus moored semi Noble Jim Thompson moored semi Noble Danny Adkins dynamically positioned

semi. Bully I ** dynamically positioned drill ship

Above are current as of December 2011. Future modifications may change the rig‟s capability. * Rig capabilities need to be assessed on a work scope specific basis. **Bully I estimated operational Q 1 , 201 2

.

h) Time taken to contract a rig, mobilize, and drill a relief well.

Relief well operations will immediately take priority and displace any activity from Shell‟s contracted rig fleet. The list of Shell contracted rigs capable of operating at this location is tabled above. It is expected to take an average of 14 days to safe ly secure the well that the rig is working on; up to the point the rig departs location, and a

further 1

- 4 days transit to mobilize to the relief well site depending on distance to travel. The relief well will take approximately 124 days to drill down to t he last casing string above the blowout zone plus approximately 40 days for precision ranging activity to intersect the blowout well bore. Total time to mobilize and drill a relief well would be approximately 182 days for this well.

If a moored rig is c hosen to conduct the relief well operations, anchor handlers would be prioritized to prepare mooring on the relief well site while the rig is being mobilized. This activity is not expected to delay initiation of relief well drilling operations. Shell has 3 deepwater anchor handlers (the Laney, Dino, and Ross Chouest) on long term contract to support its moored rigs.

The closest TLP to the Deimos reservoirs is the Mars “A” TLP. Currently there are no slots available for drilling a new well (relief well) from the Mars “A” TLP; and Mars “A” TLP‟s DVA rig is not capable to technically to drill a

MB

- 001 relief well. Therefore the only way to initiate the drilling of a relief well is with a MODU.

i) Measures proposed to enhance ability to prevent blowout and to reduce likelihood of a

blowout.

Shell believes that the best way to manage blowouts is to prevent them fro m happening. Detailed below are the measures employed by Shell with the goal of no harm to people or the environment. The Macondo incident has highlighted the importance of these practices. The lessons learned from the investigation are, and will continue to be, incorporated into our operations.

Standards: Shell‟s well design and operations adhere to internal corporate standards, the Code of Federal Regulations, and industry standards. A robust management of change process is in place to handle un

- defined or exception situations. Ingrained in the Shell standards for well control is the philosophy of multiple barriers in the well design and operations on the well.

Risk Management: Shell believes that prevention of major incidents is best managed through t he systematic identification and mitigation process (Safety Case). All Shell contracted rigs in the GOM have been operating with a Safety Case and will continue to do so. A Safety Case requires both the owner and contractors to systematically identify the risks in drilling operations and align plans to mitigate those risks; an alignment which is critical before drilling begins.

Well Design Workflow: The Well Delivery Process (WDP) is a rigorous internal assurance process with defined decision gates. The WDP leverages functional experts (internal and external) to examine the well design at the conceptual and detailed design stages for robustness before making a recommendation to the management

### review board. Shell‟s involvement in global deepwater drilling, starting in the GOM in the mid

- 1980‟s, provides a

significant depth and breadth of internal drilling and operational expertise. Third party vendors and rig contractors are involved in all stages of the planning, providing their specific expertise. A Dri ll the Well On Paper (DWOP) exercise is conducted with rig personnel and vendors involved in execution of the well. This forum communicates the well plan, and solicits input as to the safety of the plan and procedures proposed.

Well and rig equipment qua lification, certification, and quality assurance: All rigs will meet all applicable rules, regulations, and Notice to Lessees. Shell works closely with rig contractors to ensure proper upkeep of all rig equipment, which meets or exceeds the strictest of S hell, industry, or regulatory requirements. Well tangibles are governed by our internal quality assurance/control standards and industry standards.

MWD/LWD/PWD Tools: Shell intends to use these tools at MB

- 001. The MWD/LWD/PWD tools are run on the

drill string so that data on subsurface zones can be collected as the well advances in real time instead of waiting

until the drill string is pulled to run wireline logs. Data from the tools are monitored and interpreted real time against prognosis to provide early warning of abnormal pressures to allow measures to be taken to progress the well safely.

Mud Logger: Mud logging personnel continually monitor returning drilling fluids for indications of hydrocarbons, utilizing both a hot wire and a gas chromatogr aph. An abrupt increase in gas or oil carried in the returning fluid can be an indication of an impending kick. The mud logger also monitors drill cuttings returned to the surface in the drilling fluid for changes in lithology that can be an indicator that the well has penetrated or is about to penetrate a hydrocarbon

- bearing interval. Mud logging instruments also monitor penetration rate to provide an early indication of drilling breaks that show the bit penetrating a zone that could contain hydrocarbo ns. The mud logging personnel are in close communication with both the offshore drilling foremen and onshore Shell representative(s) to report any observed anomalies so appropriate action can be taken.

Remote Monitoring: The Real Time Operating Center ha s been used by Shell to complement and support traditional rig

- site monitoring since 2003. Well site operations are lived virtually by onshore teams consisting of geoscientists, petrophysicists, well engineers, and 24/7 monitoring specialists. The same r eal time well control indicators monitored by the rig personnel are watched by the monitoring specialist for an added layer of redundancy.

Competency and Behavior: A structured training program for Well Engineers and Foreman is practiced, which

includes internal professional examinations to verify competency. Other industry training in well control, such as by International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC) and International Well Control Forum (IWCF) are also mandated. Progressions have elements of competency and Shell continues to have comprehensive internal training programs. The best systems and processes can be defeated by lack of knowledge and/or improper values. We believe that a combination of HSE tools (e.g. stop work, pre

- job analysis, behavior based safety, DWOPs, audits), management HSE involvement and enforcement (e.g. compliance to life saving rules) have created a strong safety culture in our operations.

j) Measures to conduct effective and early intervention in the event of a blowout.

The response to a blowout is contained in our Well Control Contingency Plan (WCCP) which is a specific requirement of our internal well control standards. The WCCP in turn is part of the wider emergency response

framework within Shell that addre sses the overall organization response to an emergency situation. Resources are dedicated to these systems and drills are run frequently to test preparedness (security, medical, oil spill, and hurricane). This same framework is activated and tested durin g hurricane evacuations, thereby maintaining a fresh and responsive team.

The WCCP specifically addresses implementing actions at the emergency site that will ensure personnel safety, organizing personnel and their roles in the response, defining informat ion requirements, establishing protocols to mobilize specialists and pre

- selecting sources, and developing mobilization plans for personnel, material and services for well control procedures. The plan references individual activity checklists, a roster of equipment and services, initial information gathering forms, a generic description of relief well drilling, strategy and guidelines, intervention techniques and equipment, site safety management, exclusion zones, and re

- boarding.

### As set forth in 3f of t his document, Shell is currently analyzing recent advances in containment technology and

equipment and will incorporate them as they become available.

k) Arrangements for drilling a relief well

The size of the Shell contracted rig fleet in the GOM from 2010

- 2015 ensures that there is adequate well equipment (e.g. casing and wellhead) available for relief wells. Rigs and personnel will also be readily available within Shell, diverted from their a ctive roles elsewhere. Resources from other operators can also be leveraged should the need arise. Generally, relief well plans will mirror the blowout well, incorporating any learning on well design based on root cause analysis of the blowout. A generi c relief well description is outlined in the WCCP.

l) Assumptions and calculations used in approved or proposed OSRP

Shell has submitted Olympus MB

- 001 as the new DOCD worst

- case scenario to the BSEE for inclusion in our Regional OSRP.

Shell has des igned a response program (Regional OSRP being updated with this plan ) based upon a regional capability of responding to a range of spill volumes, from small operational spills up to and including the WCD from an exploration or development well blowout. She ll‟s program is developed to fully satisfy federal oil spill planning regulations. The Regional OSRP presents specific information on the response program that includes a description of personnel and equipment mobilization, the incident management team org anization, and the strategies and tactics used to implement effective and sustained spill containment and recovery operations.

### SECTION 3: GEOLOGICAL & GEOPHYSICAL INFORMATION

A. Geological Description

Proprietary data

B. Structure Contour Maps

Proprietary data

C. Interpreted Two

- dimension (2

- D) and/or Three Dimensional (3

- D) Seismic Lines

Proprietary data

D. Geological Structure Cross

- Sections

Proprietary data

E. Shallow Hazards Report

Fugro

- McClelland H azards R eport #1188

- 1062 dated April 26, 1988. Fugro

- McClelland S hallow H azards report #0201

- 1387 dated April 20 , 1992

. GEMS, Report #0403

- 643 dated August 26, 2003, “ Geologic and Stratigraphic Assessment Block 762

, OCS

- G 7957 Mississippi Canyon Area, Gulf of Mexico. ”

Seafloor investigation is based o n the C&C report number 083985

- 084126

, Archaeological and Hazard Report,

Blocks 762

- 763, 806

- 807,and Vicinity, Mississippi Canyon Area, dated June 2009.

F. Shallow Hazards Assessment

Mississippi Canyon 807 Olympus TLP Center

X = 919,072 .00 352. 00’ FWL

Y = 10,225,602.00 7

, 038.00’ FNL

Mississippi Canyon 807 Olympus TLP Pre

- Drill Wellsites

Mississippi Canyon 807, p roposed l ocations ( MB001

- MB024

, formerly A thru X ) will be located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 028 feet. The locations will be located 2

, 259 feet northwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC807 001

wellsite.

### Minor shallow buried faulting (3 to 75 feet below the mud line) and buried landslide features (from 75 feet below the mud line) are identified in the vicinity of these locations . There is no other evidence of seafloor or near

- surface amplitudes or

fluid e xpulsion features associat ed with these minor shallow buried faults.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, located west of MC 807. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped o utside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the 24 proposed locations, there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50 foot recommended avoidance, 4 sonar targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance, and an additional 15 sonar targets have been identified as potential barrels in the additional 1000‟ buffer zone surrounding the p roposed l ocations.

There are several flowlines and umbi licals in the vicinity of the proposed site

. Shell‟s Europa flowlines and umbilicals are approximately 1600 feet northeast of the p roposed l ocations. A 500 foot avoidance zone has been placed around all

flowlines and umbilicals. The p roposed l ocations will not interfere with any of the existing flowlines and umbilicals in the

area.

The stratigraphy at the sites of the proposed locations consists of approximately 590

- foot thick unit of very soft pelagic clay drape material overlying soft to firm hemipel agic silts and clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. A minor buried fault will be penetrated approximately 9 to 72 feet below the mud line in 11 of the proposed wellsites. The casing program for these locations is designed for this min or buried fault penetration. Unit 2, approximately 590 to 1231 feet below the mud line, consists of approximately 641 feet of mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit,

identified 1231 to 2559 feet below the mud line. Unit 3 consists of 262 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits and 1066 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay and stratified turbidities of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2559 to 3499 feet below the mud line, consisti ng of 940 feet of stratified mud

dominated turbidites, chaotic mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 1489 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass transport deposits, sandy slope fan channel sediments and c haotic disrupted turbidite deposits.

Amplitude anomalies are identified 500’ west of the proposed locations in Unit 4 (2

, 259 to 3

, 499 feet below the mud line), and 570’ feet west northwest of the proposed locations in Unit 5 (3

, 499 to 4

, 988 feet below t he mud line). There are no other anomalies or bright spots identified within 2

, 000’ feet of p roposed l ocations and these locations will not penetrate any amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to moderate high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1

, 493 to 2

, 559 feet below the mud line and 3

, 499

to 4

, 252 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential for shallow water flow is identified 2

, 967 to 3

, 499 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from Seafloor to 1

, 493 feet b elow the mud line, 2

, 559 to

2

, 967 feet below the mud line, and 4

, 252 to 4

, 988 feet below the mud line. The casing program for these proposed

locations is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to moderate high potential for shallow gas is identifi ed 3

, 499 to 4

, 252 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from Seafloor to 3499 feet below the mud line, and 4

, 252 to 4

, 988 feet below the mud line.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 807, Proposed

Locations MB001 through MB024 ap pear suitable for the planned activity.

### MC 762 (West Boreas) Proposed Locations

Well SD001 (M):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location SD001 is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet and is located

near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity of this location

. The proposed location is located approximately 137 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industr ial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) o f the GEMS report. This well location will be positioned approximately 434 feet

southwest of the nearest seafloor debris.

The stratigraphy at the site consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material,

underlai n by soft to firm hemipelagic silts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits, underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582 feet of

mud

- filled over

- bank deposi ts. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, identified 1254 to 2673 feet below the mud line, consisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits, 716 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay,

and 307 feet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2673 to 4013 feet below the

mud line and consists of 1340 feet of stratified mud

- dominated turbidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consis ts of 2124 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass

- transport deposits, slope fan channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Salt will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigation. The casing program is pla nned for salt penetration.

Amplitude anomalies or “bright spots” are identified over 200 feet north of this location . These amplitudes are identified

between 6

, 442 to 8

, 192 feet below the mud line. The well path for this location will not penetrate thes e amplitude

anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1

, 650 to 2

, 366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential

for shallow water flow is identified 1

, 254 to 1

, 650 feet below the mud line, 2

, 366 to 2

, 673 feet below the mud line, and

4

, 013 to 6

, 137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from Seafloor to 1

, 254 feet below the mud line, and 2

, 673 to 4

, 013 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well location is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 1

, 650 to 2

, 366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from s eafloor to 1

, 650 feet below the mud line and 2

, 673 to 6

, 137 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well location is designed to minimize flow potential.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enhanced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

location appears suitable for the planned activity.

### Well WB 001 ( N ) :

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB001 (N) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet. This

locati o n is near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity of this location, which is approximately 182 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. This location will be positioned approximately 473 feet southwest of

the n earest seafloor debris.

The stratigraphy at the site of this location consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material, underlain by soft to firm hemipelagic silts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits , underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582

feet of mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, identified 1

, 254 to 2

, 673 feet below the mud line,

c onsisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits, 716 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay, and 307 feet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2

, 673 to

4

, 013 feet be low the mud line and consists of 1

, 340 feet of stratified mud

- dominated turbidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 2

, 124 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass

transport deposits, slope fa n channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Salt will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigation. The casing program is planned for salt penetration.

Amplitude anomalies or “bright spots” are identi fied over 200 feet north of this location . These amplitudes are identified

between 6

, 442 to 8

, 192 feet below the mud line. The well path will not penetrate these amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1

, 65 0 to 2

, 366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential

for shallow water flow is identified 1

, 254 to 1

, 650 feet below the mud line, 2

, 366 to 2

, 673 feet below the mud line, and

4013 to 6

, 137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from s eafloor to 1

, 254 feet below the mud line, and 2

, 673 to 4

, 013 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well location is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 1

, 650 to 2

, 366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from s eafloor to 1

, 650 feet below the mud line and 2673 to 6137 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well is designed to minimize flow potential.

Based on a high

- re solution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enhanced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

l ocation appears suitable for the planned act ivity.

Well WB 002 ( O ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB002 ( O ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3150 feet. This

location is near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity of this location, which is located approximately 228 feet northwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806 south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have

deteriorated over time. S ome of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. This location will be positioned approximately 426 feet west of the

nearest seafloor debris.

The stratigraphy at the site of this location consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material, underlain by soft to firm hemipelagic silts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits, underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with ch aotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582

feet of mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, identified 1254 to 2673 feet below the mud line, consisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits, 71 6 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay, and 307 feet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2673 to 4013 feet below

the mud line and consists of 1340 feet of stratified mud

- dominated tur bidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and

### discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 2124 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass

- transport deposits, slope fan channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Sal t will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigation. The casing program is planned for salt penetration.

Amplitude anomalies or “bright spots” are identified over 200 feet north of this site . These amplitudes are identified

between 6442 to 8192 feet below t he mud line. The well path will not penetrate these amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential

for shallow water flow i s identified 1254 to 1650 feet below the mud line, 2366 to 2673 feet below the mud line, and 4013 to 6137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from s eafloor to 1254 feet below the mud line, and 2673 to 4013 feet belo w the mud line. The casing program for this wellsite is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from Seafloor to 1650 feet below the mud line and 2673 to 6137 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this wellsite is designed to minimize flow potential.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enhanced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

location appears suitable for the planned activity.

Well WB 004 ( P ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB004 ( P ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3150 feet. It is
located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity of this area,

which is located approximately 199 feet northwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762

. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the

Geo logic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. This location will be positioned approximately 377 feet west of the

nearest seafloor debris.

The stratigraphy at the site of this consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material, underlain by soft to firm hemipelagic silts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits, underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582 feet o f

mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, identified 1254 to 2673 feet below the mud line, consisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits, 716 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay,

and 307 f

eet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2673 to 4013 feet below the

mud line and consists of 1340 feet of stratified mud

- dominated turbidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate ampli tude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 2124 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass

- transport deposits, slope fan channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Salt will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigatio n. The casing program is planned for salt penetration.

Amplitude anomalies or “bright spots” are identified over 200 feet north of this location . These amplitudes are identified between 6442 to 8192 feet below the mud line. The well path will not penet rate these amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential for shallow water flow is identified 1254 to 1650 feet below the mud line, 2366 to 2673 feet below the mud line, and 4013 to 6137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from Seafloor to 1254 feet below the mud line, and 2673 to 4013 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well is designed to minimize f low potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from Seafloor to 1650 feet below the mud line and 2673 to 6137 feet below the mud line. The casing program for this well is designed to minimize flow potential.

### Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enhanced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

well site appears suitable for the planned activity.

Well WB 003 ( Q ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB003 ( Q ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3150 feet. This

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity and is located approximately 159 feet west of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in M C806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. This location will be positioned approximately 331 feet west of the

nearest seafloor debris.

The stratigraphy at the site of this location consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material, underlain by soft to firm hemipelagic si lts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits, underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582

feet of mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, id entified 1254 to 2673 feet below the mud line, consisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- levee deposits, 716 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay, and 307 feet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and cl ay. Unit 4 is identified 2673 to 4013 feet below

the mud line and consists of 1340 feet of stratified mud

- dominated turbidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 2124 feet of discontinuous , mud

- rich mass

- transport deposits, slope fan channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Salt will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigation. The casing program is planned for salt penetration.

Ampl itude anomalies or “bright spots” are identified over 200 feet north of this location . These amplitudes are identified between 6442 to 8192 feet below the mud line. The well path will not penetrate these amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential for shallow water flow is identified 1254 to 1650 feet below the mud line, 2366 to 2673 feet below the mud line, and

4013 to 6137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from Seafloor to 1254 feet below the mud line, and 2673 to 4013 feet below the mud line. The casing program is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 16 50 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from s eafloor to 1650 feet below the mud line and 2673 to 6137 feet below the mud line. The casing program designed to minimize flow potential.

Based on a high

- resolution ge ophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enhanced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

location appears suitable for the planned activity.

We ll SD002 ( S ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location SD002 ( S ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3150 feet. The

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no seafloor faulting in the vicinity of this wellsite, which is located approximately 54 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have

deteriorated over time. So me of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. This location will be positioned approximately 385 feet southwest of

the nearest seafloor debris.

The stratigra phy at the site consists of Unit 1, a 672

- foot thick unit consisting of very soft pelagic clay drape material, underlain by soft to firm hemipelagic silts and clays, over slump and debris flow deposits, underlain by stratified hemipelagic silty clays inter

- bedded with chaotic mass

- transport deposits. Unit 2 consists of approximately 582 feet of

### mud

- filled over

- bank deposits. Unit 3 is the Blue Unit, identified 1254 to 2673 feet below the mud line, consisting of 396 feet of discontinuous, sandy channel

- lev ee deposits, 716 feet of chaotic mass

- transport deposits of sand, silt and clay, and 307 feet of stratified turbidites of interbedded sand, silt and clay. Unit 4 is identified 2673 to 4013 feet below the

mud line and consists of 1340 feet of stratified mu d

- dominated turbidites, chaotic, mass

- transport deposits and discontinuous, moderate amplitude deposits. Unit 5 consists of 2124 feet of discontinuous, mud

- rich mass

- transport deposits, slope fan channel sediments and chaotic disrupted turbidite deposits. The Top of Salt will be penetrated beyond the limits of this shallow hazards investigation. The casing program is planned for salt penetration.

Amplitude anomalies or “bright spots” are identified over 200 feet north of this location . These amplitudes are identified between 6442 to 8192 feet below the mud line. The well path will not penetrate these amplitude anomalies.

Moderate to high potential for shallow water flow is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Moderate potential

for shall ow water flow is identified 1254 to 1650 feet below the mud line, 2366 to 2673 feet below the mud line, and 4013 to 6137 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow water flow is identified from Seafloor to 1254 feet below the mud line, and 2673 to 4013 feet below the mud line. The casing program is designed to minimize flow potential.

Moderate to high potential for shallow gas is identified 1650 to 2366 feet below the mud line. Low potential for shallow gas is identified from Seafloor to 1650 feet below the mud line and 2673 to 6137 feet below the mud line. The casing program is designed to minimize flow potential.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, and Enh anced Surface Renderings with amplitudes applied, and side scan sonar and sub

- bottom profiler, this

location appears suitable for the planned activity.

West Boreas (MC 762) Processing Platform

Mississippi Canyon 807 (Olympus) TLP

Center

X = 919 ,072.00 352.00‟ FWL

Y = 10,225,602.00 7038.00‟ FNL

The Olympus TLP will serve as the processing platform for the Mississippi Canyon 762 wellsites. The MC 807 Olympus TLP will be located in a water depth of approximately 3028 feet. MC 762 (We st Boreas) objectives will not be drilled from the MC 807 Olympus TLP platform site.

Kevin Bradford Arlette C. Nunez Dougal Grant Geophysicist Shallow Hazard Coordinator Staff Geologist

G

. High

- Resolution Seismic Lines

See attached

H and I Straitigraphic Column with Time vs Depth

Not required for DOCDs.

J. Geochemical Information

Not required for DOCD in the GOMR.

### SECTION 4: HYDROGEN SULFIDE (H 2 

### S)

Based on CFR 5 50. 245 , Shell requests that the Regional Supervisor, Field Operations, determine the zones in the proposed drilling operations in this plan are classified as an area where the absence of H 2 

### S has been confirmed.

SECTION 5: MINERALS RESOURCE CONSERVATION

A. Technology and reservoir engineering practices and procedures

The Mars B waterflood program is a secondary recovery program designed to maintain or slightly increase reservoir pressure during production in fours reservoirs in the Mars field. First injection from the Olympus TLP is scheduled to start

2021 and will co nsist of six down

- dip direct vertical access water injectors and will compliment the current Mars A waterflood program.

B. Technology and recovery practices and procedures

Injection is being optimized through targeting and positioning considerations such as location of the OWC, Kh at injection locations, and vertical and lateral distances from producers. Pressure maintenance will prevent the development of a secondary gas cap, and increase the effectiveness of the water drive mechanism.

C. Reservoir Deve lopment

The Mars field encompasses six OCS Leases in the Mississippi Canyon Area that are captured within the Mars Operating Unit. The field was discovered in 1989 and production commenced in 1996 from the Mars A TLP. Water injection from

the Mars A TL P started in 2004 with injection into 3 primary reservoirs

. Injection is planned for two other reservoirs to maximize production from the field.

### SECTION 6: BIOLOGICAL, PHYSICAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC INFORMATION

Biological Information

NTL 2009

- G40, dated January 27, 2010, for water depths greater than 984 feet

 Features or areas that could support high

- density chemosynthetic communities are not within 2,000 feet of
each proposed mud and cuttings discharge location.

History Shallow Hazards Reports:

Fugro

- McClelland H azards R eport #1188

- 1062 dated April 26, 1988

. Fugro

- McClelland S hallow H azards R eport # 0201

- 1387, d ated April 20, 1992

. GEMS, Report #0403

- 643 , Geologic and Stratigraphic Assessment Block 762 (OCS

- G 7957 Mississippi Canyon Area,

Gulf of Mexico dated August 26, 2003 Seafloor investigation is based on the C&C report number 083985

- 084126: Archaeological and Hazard Report, Blocks

762

- 763, 806

- 807, and Vicinity, Mississippi Canyon Area, dated June 2009.

Mississippi Canyon 807 Olympus TLP C enter

X = 919,072 .00 352.00’ FWL

Y = 10,225,602.00 7038.00’ FNL

Mississippi Canyon 807 Olympus TLP Pre

- Drill Wellsites

Mississippi Canyon 807, Proposed Locations MB001 through MB024 will be located in a water depth of approximately

3

, 02 8 feet. Minor shallow buried faulting (3 to 75 feet below the mud line) and buried landslide features (from 75 feet below the mud line) are identified in the vicinity of the proposed location

. There is no other evidence of seafloor or near

surface amplit udes or fluid expulsion feature s associated with these minor, shallow buried faults. These locations will not disturb any high

- density areas of benthic c ommunities.

The surface location for Shell’s previously drilled MC 807 #1 wellsite will be positioned 2259 southeast of Shell’s Mississippi Canyon 807 proposed locations . The surface location for Shell’s previously drilled MC 806 #2 wellsite will be positioned 2

, 827 ’ north and these wellsites will be within the additional 1

, 000’ buffer around the 2

, 000’ wellsite clearance.

There are no other locations within the 2

, 000 foot site clearance or 1

, 000 foot buffer zone. Avoidance zones (500’) for Shell’s previously drilled MC 806 No. 1, 807 No. 2, 807 No. 3 and 807 No. 5 wellsites will be located within the 1

, 000’

buffer zone. These new wells will be positioned 6

, 302 feet south of Shell’s previously drilled MC 807 Mars TLP platform. The p roposed l ocations will not interfere with any previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified i n MC 805, west of MC 807. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 fee t of the 24 proposed locations, there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50 foot recommended avoidance, 4 sonar targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance, and an additional 15 sonar targets have been identified as potential barrels in the additional 1000‟ buffer zone surrounding p roposed l ocations.

### The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested, for all contacts within 2000‟ of Proposed Locations A thru X.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Target X Sonar Target Y Distance from Prop

Loc MB001 thru

MB024 MC 807 Rig Center Direction from Prop

Loc MB001 thru

MB024 MC 807 Rig Center Avoidance Footage

2259 917247 10224628 1884 Southwest 50

2260 917271 10224637 2043 Southwest 50

2265 917391 10225464 1687 West 50

2266 917430 10225206 1689 West 50

2267 917452 10224600 1905 Southwest 50

2273 917609 10226930 1976 Northwest 100

2274 917631 10226815 2069 Northeast 50

2275 917642 10224149 2039 Southwest 100

2276 917784 10225658 1289 West 50

2281 917923 10225173 1226 West 50

2286 918013 10224072 1861 Southwest 100

2289 918285 10224227 1584 Southwest 50

2291 918392 10225477 691 West 50

2293 918408 10225483 675 West 100

2294 918468 10223757 1941 Southwest 50

2297 918550 10225152 689 Southwest 50

2302 918619 10224786 933 Southwest 50

2304 918714 10224709 962 Southwest 50

2311 919043 10224820 783 South 50

2318 919158 10223585 2019 South 50

2322 919226 10223782 1827 South 50

2324 919257 10223787 1824 South 50



### The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested, for all

contacts within the additional 1000‟ buffer zone for the 2

, 000‟ clearance of p roposed locations

.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Target X Sonar Target Y Distance from Prop

Loc MB001 thru

MB024 MC 807 Rig Center Direction from Prop

Loc MB001 thru

MB024 MC 807 Rig Center Avoidance Footage

2235 916317 10226007 2785 West 50

2236 916324 10226430 2870 West 50

2241 916538 10227232 3013 Northwest 50

2242 916562 10227170 2960 Northwest 50

2249 916843 10226972 2616 Northwest 50

2250 916855 10227604 2987 Northwest 50

2257 917041 10226401 2183 West 50

2271 917539 10227273 2268 Northwest 50

2282 917951 10223539 2348 Southwest 50

2284 918013 10227991 2603 Northwest 50

2330 919429 10228097 2520 North 50

2342 919746 10223089 2602 South 50

2344 919829 10223060 2652 South 50

2363 920742 10227796 2757 Northeast 50

2386 921356 10224756 2436 Southeast 50



### There are several flowlines and umbilicals in the vicinity of the proposed well site. Shell‟s Europa flowlines and umbilicals are approximately 1

, 600 feet northeast of this area . A 500 foot avoidance zone has been placed around all flowlines and

umbilicals. These locations will not interfere with any of the existing flowlines and umbilicals in the area.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enh anced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 807, Proposed

Locations MB001 through MB024 appear suitable for the planned activity.

MC 762 (West Boreas) Proposed Loc ations

### Well SD001 ( M ) :

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location SD001 ( M ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet and is

located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evidence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this location

. The p roposed l ocation will not disturb any hig h

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

This location will be positioned 137 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite and 5

, 934 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite. It will be positioned 6

, 066 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC

762 #2 wellsite. This location will not interfere with these previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the location , there are 20 sonar targets identified as potenti al barrels with 50

- foot recommended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100

foot avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested for all

contacts located wi thin 2000‟ of this location.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y D istance from Proposed Location

SD001 (MC 762) Di rection from

Proposed Location

SD001 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 433.78 Southwest 50

673 904766 10233554 454.99 Northwest 50

674 904774 10233890 554.15 Southwest 50

656 904558 10234090 562.63 Southwest 50

686 904908 10233462 608.36 Northwest 50

649 904456 10232907 692.15 Northwest 50

650 904473 10234261 695.88 Southwest 100

689 904982 10234174 892.75 Southwest 50

618 903650 10234214 913.86 Southeast 50

663 904631 10232661 976.57 Northwest 50

648 904442 10234628 1052.06 Southwest 50

693 905063 10232833 1062.07 Northwest 50

694 905074 10232651 1204.63 Northwest 100

597 903109 10233902 1244.32 Southeast 50

698 905122 10232541 1320.59 Northwest 50

647 904414 10234902 1321.94 Southwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1361.65 Southeast 50

643 904308 10235091 1507.01 Southeast 50

644 904333 10232034 1550.14 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1862.20 Southwest 50

708 905491 10232117 1882.05 Northwest 50

722 905632 10232100 1986.12 Northwest 50



### This location will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. The location will not interfere with these flowlines and c urrently there are no other flowlines within the vicinity

of this wellsite

.

### Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR ‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed

Location SD001 appears suitable for the planned activity.

Well WB 001 ( N ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB001 ( N ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet. This

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evidence of seafloor or near

surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the v icinity . This location will not disturb any high

density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

This location will be positioned 182 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite

, 5976 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite and 6108 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #2 wellsite. This

location will not interfere with these previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite cons ists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of this site , there are 19 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with 50

- foot recomm ended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot

avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested for al l

contacts located within 2

, 000‟ of this location

.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y Distance from Proposed Location

WB001 (MC 762) Direction from

Proposed Location

WB001 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 473.07 Southwest 50

673 904766 10233554 505.28 Northwest 50

656 904558 10234090 581.05 Southwest 50

674 904774 10233890 593.42 Southwest 50

686 904908 10233462 658.56 Northwest 50

650 904473 10234261 703.39 Southwest 100

649 904456 10232907 710.02 Northwest 50

618 903650 10234214 874.03 Southeast 50

689 904982 10234174 927.07 Southwest 50

663 904631 10232661 999.60 Northwest 50

648 904442 10234628 1053.49 Southwest 50

693 905063 10232833 1102.11 Northwest 50

597 903109 10233902 1194.47 Southeast 100

694 905074 10232651 1241.40 Northwest 50

647 904414 10234902 1320.78 Southwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1332.79 Southeast 50

698 905122 10232541 1356.47 Northwest 50

643 904308 10235091 1501.70 Southwest 50

644 904333 10232034 1557.62 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1857.60 Southwest 50

708 905491 10232117 1918.38 Northwest 50



### This location will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. This p roposed l ocation will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity of this location

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s ), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed

Location WB001 appears suitable for the planned activity.

Well WB 00 2 ( O ):

### Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB002 ( O ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet. This

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evidence of seafloor or near

surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the v icinity of this location. The p roposed l ocation will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

This location will be positioned 228 feet northwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite

, 5

, 418 feet southwest of

Shell ‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite and 6

, 045 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #2 wellsite.

This will not interfere with these previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of this location , there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with 50

- foot recommended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100

foot avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested for all

contacts located within 2000‟ of this location

.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y Distance from Proposed Locati on WB002 (MC 762) Direction from

Proposed Location

WB002 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 426.30 Southwest 50

656 904558 10234090 451.45 Southwest 50

674 904774 10233890 539.16 Southwest 50

650 904473 10234261 548.90 Southwest 100

673 904766 10233554 554.30 Southwest 50

686 904908 10233462 721.01 Northwest 50

618 903650 10234214 753.81 Southeast 50

689 904982 10234174 840.59 Southwest 50

649 904456 10232907 876.32 Northwest 50

648 904442 10234628 889.74 Southwest 50

597 903109 10233902 1150.92 Southeast 100

647 904414 10234902 1154.56 Southwest 50

663 904631 10232661 1161.90 Northwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1179.43 Southeast 50

693 905063 10232833 1231.59 Northwest 50

643 904308 10235091 1333.22 Southwest 50

694 905074 10232651 1380.21 Northwest 50

698 905122 10232541 1497.39 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1689.29 Southwest 50

644 904333 10232034 1726.95 Northwest 50



### This location will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. This location will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity

of this area

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismi c, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed

Location WB002 appears suitable for the planned activity



### .

### Well WB 00 4 ( P ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB004 ( P ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet. This

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evidence of seafloor or near

surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this location

. This location will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

This location will be positioned 199 feet northwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite

, 5

, 864 feet southwest of

Shel l‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite and will be positioned 6045 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC

762 #2 wellsite. This l ocation will not interfere with these previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified i n MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of this location , there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with 50

- foot recommended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100

foot avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, dist ance, direction and avoidance footage requested for all

contacts located within 2

, 000‟ of this location

.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y Distance from Proposed Location

WB004 (MC 762) Direction from

Proposed Location

WB004 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 377.03 Southwest 50

656 904558 10234090 410.90 Southwest 50

674 904774 10233890 489.68 Southwest 50

673 904766 10233554 514.95 Northwest 50

650 904473 10234261 519.98 Southwest 100

686 904908 10233462 682.91 Northwest 50

618 903650 10234214 785.78 Southeast 50

689 904982 10234174 793.03 Southwest 50

648 904442 10234628 868.85 Southwest 50

649 904456 10232907 878.15 Northwest 50

647 904414 10234902 1136.83 Southwest 50

663 904631 10232661 1158.59 Northwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1194.41 Southeast 50

597 903109 10233902 1197.19 Southeast 100

693 905063 10232833 1209.77 Northwest 50

643 904308 10235091 1320.03 Southwest 50

694 905074 10232651 1361.99 Northwest 50

698 905122 10232541 1479.94 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1675.48 Southwest 50

644 904333 10232034 1737.33 Northwest 50



### This location will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. This location will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity

of this location

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, MB004 appears suitable for the planned ac tivity.

Well WB 00 3 ( Q ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location WB003 ( Q ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3

, 150 feet. This

location is located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evidence of seafloor or near

surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this location

. This location will not disturb any high

- densi ty areas of deepwater benthic communities.

### This location will be positioned 159 feet west of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite

, 5

, 825 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite and positioned 5

, 957 feet southwest of Shell ‟s previously drilled MC 762 #2

wellsite. This location will not interfere with these previously drilled wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have

deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of this location , there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with 50

- foot recommended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100

foot avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested for all

contacts located within 2

, 000‟ of this loc ation

.

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y Distance from Proposed Location

WB003 (MC 762) Direction from

Proposed Location

WB003 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 330.65 Southwest 50

656 904558 10234090 391.15 Southwest 50

674 904774 10233890 445.39 Southwest 50

673 904766 10233554 466.00 Northwest 50

650 904473 10234261 516.36 Southwest 100

686 904908 10233462 634.35 Northwest 50

689 904982 10234174 757.20 Southwest 50

618 903650 10234214 832.66 Southeast 50

649 904456 10232907 859.81 Northwest 50

648 904442 10234628 873.08 Southwest 50

663 904631 10232661 1134.85 Northwest 50

647 904414 10234902 1143.91 Southwest 50

693 905063 10232833 1170.71 Northwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1230.71 Southeast 50

597 903109 10233902 1247.11 Southeast 100

694 905074 10232651 1325.50 Northwest 50

643 904308 10235091 1331.60 Southeast 50

698 905122 10232541 1443.97 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1686.02 Southeast 50

644 904333 10232034 1726.07 Northeast 50



### This location will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. This location will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity

of this l ocation

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed

Location WB003 ( Q ) appears suitable for the planned activity.

Well SD002 ( S ):

Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed Location SD002 ( S ) is located in a water depth of approximately 3150 feet and is

located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no evi dence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity this location. This wellsite will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

The wellsite be positioned 54 feet southw est of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 806

- 3 wellsite

, 5881 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #3 wellsite and 6012 feet southwest of Shell‟s previously drilled MC 762 #2 wellsite. This

location will not interfere with these previously dril led wellsites.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 805, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums have been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the

Geol ogic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2000 feet of this location , there are 20 sonar targets

### identified as potential barrels with 50

- foot recommended avoidances and 2 targets identified as modern debris with 100

foot avoidances.

The table below lists the sonar contact number, coordinates, distance, direction and avoidance footage requested for all

contacts located within 2000‟ of this location



### .

Sonar Contact # Sonar Contact X Sonar Contact Y Distance from Proposed Location

SD002 (MC 762) Direction from

Proposed Location

S D002 (MC 762) Avoidance Footage

665 904672 10233826 385.44 Southwest 50

673 904766 10233554 395.14 Northwest 50

674 904774 10233890 505.21 Southwest 50

656 904558 10234090 539.10 Southwest 50

686 904908 10233462 549.71 Northwest 50

649 904456 10232907 682.19 Northwest 50

650 904473 10234261 684.49 Southwest 100

689 904982 10234174 848.65 Southwest 50

618 903650 10234214 958.22 Southeast 50

663 904631 10232661 958.65 Northwest 50

693 905063 10232833 1020.53 Northwest 50

648 904442 10234628 1046.34 Southwest 50

694 905074 10232651 1167.60 Northwest 50

698 905122 10232541 1284.66 Northwest 50

597 903109 10233902 1302.42 Southeast 100

647 904414 10234902 1318.67 Southwest 50

619 903652 10234775 1391.72 Southeast 50

643 904308 10235091 1508.36 Southeast 50

644 904333 10232034 1550.49 Northeast 50

708 905491 10232117 1845.06 Northwest 50

645 904339 10235446 1862.29 Southeast 50

722 905632 10232100 1946.76 Northwest 50



### This location will be positioned over 1700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines and will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity of this

wellsite

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey, consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied, and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 762, Proposed

Location SD00 2 ( S ) appears suitable for the planned activity.

Proposed Olympus (MC 807) TLP Proposed Tendon Piles

Tendon Pile X Y FEL FNL

P1 919,071.40 10,225,815.21 351.40‟ 6824.79‟

P2 919,095.16 10,225,825.62 375.16‟ 6814.38‟

P3 919,126.70 10,225,819.89 406.70‟ 6820.11‟

P4 919,145.58 10,225,802.02 425.58‟ 6837.98‟

P5 919,285.07 10,225,602.60 565.07‟ 7037.40‟

P6 919,295.60 10,225,579.01 575.60‟ 7060.99‟

P7 919,290.03 10,225,547.29 570.03‟ 7092.71‟

P8 919,272.15 10,225,528.51 552.15‟ 7111.49‟

P9 919,072.72 10,225,388.89 352.72‟ 7251.11‟

P10 919,049.00 10,225,378.41 329.00‟ 7261.59‟

P11 919,017.27 10,225,383.95 297.27‟ 7256.05‟

P12 918,998.50 10,225,401.84 278.50‟ 7238.61‟

P13 918,858.92 10,225,601.39 138.92‟ 7038.61‟

P14 918,848.53 10,225,625.11 128.53‟ 7014.89‟

P15 918,854.02 10,225,656.86 134.02‟ 6983.14‟

P16 918,871.98 10,225,675.43 151.98‟ 6965.47‟



### Minor shallow buried faulting (3 to 75 feet below the mud line) and buried landslide features from 75 feet below the mud line) are identified in the vicinity of Proposed TLP Tension Pile Locations P1 through P16. There is no other evidence of

### seafloor or near

- surface amplitudes or fluid expulsion features associated with these minor, shallow buried faults. These

l ocations will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, west of MC 807. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2000 feet of the propose d locations there are 18 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50

- foot recommended avoidance, and 4 sonar targets identified as modern

debris with 100 foot avoidance.

There are several flowlines and umbilicals in the vicinity of the site of the location . Shell‟s Europa flowlines and umbilicals are approximately 1600 feet northeast of the proposed TLP piles . A 500 foot avoidance zone has been placed around all

flowlines and umbilicals , and this locations will not interfere with any of the e xisting flowlines and umbilicals in the area.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied and AUV high

- resolution data, Mississippi Canyon 807, Olympus TLP Proposed Tension Pile Locations P1 through P16 appear suitable for the planned activity



### .

Proposed West Boreas UTA‟s, PLET Sleds and Manifold

Location X Y FWL FSL

WB UTA

- 8191 (MC 762) 904,640.91 10,233,603.17 1760.91‟ 963.17‟

West Boreas EDM

- 8190 (MC 762) 904,702,47 10,233,545.64 1822.47‟ 905.64‟ F/L

- 1 PLET SLED

- 8110 (MC 762 904,405.08 10,233,690.78 1525.08‟ 1050.78‟
F/L

- 2 PLET SLED

- 8120 (MC 762) 904,393.40 10,233,739.4 1513.40‟ 1099.40‟

West Boreas Manifold MFD

- 8100 (MC 762) 904,293.32 10,233,677.92 1413.32‟ 1037.92‟



### West Boreas UTA

- 8191 (MC 762)

West Boreas UTA

- 8191 in MC 762 will be located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no

other evidence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this

UTA

. This loca tion will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped o utside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the UTA site, there are 21 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50

- foot recommended avoidance, and 2 sonar ta rgets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance. The closest target is identified as Target #673, 134.43 feet northwest of the UTA.

The UTA will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars Flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity of this site

.

Based on a high

- resolution geophysical survey consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied and AUV high

- resolution data, West Boreas UTA

- 8191 in MC 762 appears suitable for the planned activity.

### West Boreas EDM

- 8190 (MC 762)

West Boreas EDM

- 8190 in MC 762 will be located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley. There is no

o ther evidence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this

EDM. This location will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is iden tified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the EDM site, there are 21 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50

- foot recommended avoidance, and 2 sonar targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance. The closest target is identified as Target # 673, 64.08 f eet southwest of this EDM

.

The EDM will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars Flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity of this site.

Based on a high

- resolution g eophysical survey consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied and AUV high

- resolution data, West Boreas EDM

- 8190 in MC 762 appears suitable for the planned activity.

F/L

- 1 PLET SLED

- 811 0 (MC 762)

West Boreas F/L

- 1 PLET Sled

- 8110 in MC 762 will be located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley.

There is no other evidence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of this PLET

. This location will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have deteriorated over time. Some of the drums had been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the PLET Sled site, there are 21 sonar targets

identi fied as potential barrels with a 50

- foot recommended avoidance, and 2 sonar targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance. The closest target is identified as Target # 665, 299.22 feet southwest of this location

.

The PLET Sled will be posit ioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars

Flowlines. The PLET Sled will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity

of this location

.

Based on a high

- r esolution geophysical survey consisting of frequency enhanced 3

- D seismic, Enhanced Surface Renderings, (ESR‟s), ESR‟s with amplitudes applied and AUV high

- resolution data, West Boreas F/L

- 1 PLET Sled

- 8110 in MC 762 appears suitable for the planned activit y.

F/L

- 2 PLET SLED

- 8120 (MC 762)

West Boreas F/L

- 2 PLET Sled

- 8120 in MC 762 will be located near the center of a near

- surface ancient slump valley.

There is no other evidence of seafloor or near

- surface faulting, slumping, amplitude or fluid expulsion features in the vicinity of the PLET Sled. The PLET Sled will not disturb any high

- density areas of deepwater benthic communities.

An Industrial Waste Dump site is identified in MC 806, south of MC 762. This dumpsite consists of drums that have

deteriorated over time. Some of the drums h ad been dropped outside of the limits of the site and are identified on the Geologic Features Map (Map 5) of the GEMS report. Within 2

, 000 feet of the PLET Sled site, there are 19 sonar targets identified as potential barrels with a 50

- foot recommended av oidance, and 2 sonar targets identified as modern debris with 100 foot avoidance. The closest target is identified as Target # 665, 291.75 feet southwest of this location

.

The PLET Sled will be positioned over 1

, 700 feet east of ATP‟s flowline and 3

, 450 feet north of Shell‟s Europ a to Mars Flowlines. F/L

- 2 PLET Sled

- 8120 will not interfere with these flowlines. Currently, there are no other flowlines within the vicinity of West Boreas F/L

- 2 PLET Sled

- 8120 in MC 762.