# SECTION 7.1 APPENDIX A

RESIDENTIAL WOOD COMBUSTION

– DETAILED TABLES

This Appendix presents the summary of 2005 residential wood use and associated emissions for

Residential Wood Combustion in the state.

List of Tables

Table A

- 1: Fireplaces

- Number of Devices

Table A

- 2 : Fireplaces

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

Table A

- 3: Fireplaces

– Amount of Manufactured Logs Burned

Table A

- 4: Wood Stoves

- Number of Devices

Table A

- 5: Wood Stoves

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

Table A

- 6: Fireplace Inserts

- Number of Devices

Table A

- 7: Fireplace Inserts

– Amount of Cord Wood & Bundle Wood Burned

Table A

- 8: Fireplace Inserts

– Amount of Compressed Wood Logs Burned

Table A

- 9: Pellet Stoves

- Num ber of Devices

Table A

- 10: Pellet Stoves

– Amount of Pellets Burned

Table A

- 11: Fireplaces

– 2005 Fuel Use and Emissions Estimates

Table A

- 12: All Wood Stoves

– 2005 Fuel Use and Emissions Estimates

7.1 A

- 1

## Table A

- 1: FIREPLACES

- Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P fp 

### P fp,u 

### [P fp 

### ]x[P fp,u 

### ] H fp,u 

### M fp 

### FP Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

with wood

burning

fir eplaces % of homes

that u se their

wood burning

fireplace % of homes with

wood bur ning

fireplaces that are

in use # of homes

with

fireplaces

in use # of

fireplaces

per home # of

fireplaces

in use

GBV GBU Alpine 528 66.0

- 66.0 348 1.1 383 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Inyo 7,808 47.7

- 47.7 3,724 1.1 4,096 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Mono 5,774 69.7

- 69.7 4,025 1.1 4,427 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

LC LAK Lake 24,790 46 77 35.4 8,781 1.1 9,659 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 14,220 39.0 71 27.7 3,938 1.1 4,331 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

LT PLA Placer (LT) 6,000 39.0 71 27.7 1,661 1.1 1,827 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC AMA Amador 13,961 50.6

- 50.6 7,060 1.1 7,766 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC CAL Calaveras 18,573 46 77 35.4 6,579 1.1 7,236 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 51,742 39.0 71 27.7 14,327 1.1 15,760 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC MPA Mariposa 7,276 46 77 35.4 2,577 1.1 2,835 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC NSI Nevada 40,157 46 77 35.4 14,224 1.1 15,646 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC NSI Plumas 9,775 64.2

- 64.2 6,274 1.1 6,901 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC NSI Sierra 1,568 58.4

- 58.4 915 1.1 1,006 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 10,799 39.0 71 27.7 2,990 1.1 3,289 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MC TUO Tuolumne 22,056 46 77 35.4 7,812 1.1 8,593 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 96,033

- 0.0 0 19,062 Census, 2004a, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 4, 8

MD KER Kern (MD) 37,223 32 37 11.8 4,407 1.1 4,848 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 6,583

- 0.0 0 1,729 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

MD MOJ San Bernardino

(MD) 125,319

- 0.0 0 36,488 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

MD SC Riverside (MD) 3,591

- 0.0 0 1,038 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

NC MEN Mendocino 34,798 51.2

- 51.2 17,814 1.1 19,595 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Del Norte 9,513 58.0

- 58.0 5,521 1.1 6,073 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Humboldt 53,152 42.4

- 42.4 22,537 1.1 24,791 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Trinity 5,739 71.2

- 71.2 4,085 1.1 4,494 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 23,511 55.8 40.9 22.8 5,366 1.1 5,902 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

NCC MBU Monterey 126,559 30.7

- 30.7 38,794 1.1 42,674 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NCC MBU San Benito 16,980 32.1

- 32.1 5,443 1.1 5,987 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 94,693 43.1

- 43.1 40,814 1.1 44,895 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP LAS Lassen 10,214 61.0

- 61.0 6,230 1.1 6,853 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP MOD Modoc 3,978 53.4

- 53.4 2,123 1.1 2,335 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 19,472 61.2

- 61.2 11,922 1.1 13,115 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 3,105,059

- 0.0 0 616,322 Census, 2004a, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 4, 8

SC SC Orange 977,547

- 0.0 0 307,999 Census, 2003a, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 5, 8

SC SC Riverside (SC) 463,188

- 0.0 0 132,124 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

SC SC San Bernardino

(SC) 444,312 0.0 0 127,223 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

SCC SB Santa Barbara 143,106 38.0

- 38.0 54,380 1.0 54,380 Sierra, 1989; Table E

- 3 10

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 100,494 37.4

- 37.4 37,607 1.1 41,367 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SCC VEN Ventura 258,483 27.1

- 27.1 69,983 1.1 76,981 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SD SD San Diego 1,056,548 0.0 0 266,077 Census, 2004b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 7, 8

SF BA Alameda 542,540 54.0 32.2 17.4 94,337 1.1 103,771 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Contra Costa 368,770 67.0 35.7 23.9 88,206 1.1 97,027 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Marin 103,250 63.8 46.6 29.7 30,697 1.1 33,767 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Napa 49,290 61.2 39.1 23.9 11,795 1.1 12,974 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Francisco 338,700 45.0 27.8 12.5 42,371 1.1 46,609 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Mateo 261,280 68.8 40.2 27.7 72,264 1.1 79,490 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Santa Clara 595,550 60.6 27.9 16.9 100,692 1.1 110,761 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 101,410 62.5 33.9 21.2 21,486 1.1 23,635 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 158,970 55.8 40.9 22.8 36,280 1.1 39,908 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SJV SJU Fresno 261,554 41 34 13.9 36,461 1.1 40,107 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 181,734 32 37 11.8 21,517 1.1 23,669 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Kings 35,812 32 37 11.8 4,240 1.1 4,664 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Madera 38,051 33 43 14.2 5,399 1.1 5,939 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Merced 67,116 33 43 14.2 9,524 1.1 10,476 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU San Joaquin 193,423 54 49 26.5 51,180 1.1 56,298 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Stanislaus 153,742 46 43 19.8 30,410 1.1 33,451 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SJV SJU Tulare 114,640 33 57 18.8 21,564 1.1 23,720 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 9

SS IMP Imperial 43,771 6.9

- 6.9 3,020 1.1 3,322 Sierra, 1989; Table E

- 3 10



# 7.1 A

- 2

## Table A

- 1: FIREPLACES

- Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P fp 

### P fp,u 

### [P fp 

### ]x[P fp,u 

### ] H fp,u 

### M fp 

### FP Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

with wood

burning

fir eplaces % of homes

that u se their

wood burning

fireplace % of homes with

wood bur ning

fireplaces that are

in use # of homes

with

fireplaces

in use # of

fireplaces

per home # of

fireplaces

in use

SS SC Riverside (SS) 125,073

- 0.0 0 35,975 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4;

Census, 2009 6, 8

SV BUT Butte 85,478 39.0 71 27.7 23,669 1.1 26,036 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV COL Colusa 6,617 39.0 71 27.7 1,832 1.1 2,015 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV FR Sutter 29,776 39 71 27.7 8,245 1.1 9,069 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV FR Yuba 22,021 39 71 27.7 6,098 1.1 6,707 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV GLE Glenn 9,506 39.0 71 27.7 2,632 1.1 2,895 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV PLA Placer (SV) 103,191 31 63 19.5 20,153 1.1 22,169 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig.

3, Fig. 11 11

SV SAC Sacramento 500,604 31 63 19.5 97,768 1.1 107,545 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig.

3, Fig. 11 11

SV SHA Shasta 68,220 39.0 71 27.7 18,890 1.1 20,779 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV TEH Tehama 22,410 39 71 27.7 6,205 1.1 6,826 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV YS Solano (SV) 49,415 31 63 19.5 9,651 1.1 10,616 OMNI, 2003; 2.3a, 3.1 3

SV YS Yolo 66,027 31 63 19.5 12,895 1.1 14,185 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig.

3, Fig. 11 11

12,149,062 2,970,515

Notes:

H total : Number of occupied housing units/homes in 2005.

P fp : Percent of homes with wood burning fireplaces.

P fp,u : Percent of homes with a fireplace, where the fireplace was actually used during the burn season.

H fp,u : Number of homes with fireplaces that are actually being used. H fp,u = [H total ]*[P fp ]*[P fp,u ]

M fp = 1.1 fireplaces per home

FP all = Total number of fireplaces that are actually being used. FP all = [H total ]*[P fp ]*[P fp,u ] *[M fp ]

Note: Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties are based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood Smoke Season",

Figures 2 and 15; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

2 NCRA, 1988. Northern California Research Associates; "Draft Report, The California Residential Wood Consumption Survey", Tables II, VIII; May 1988

.

For the NCRA report, [% of Homes with a Wood

- Burning Fireplace] = [% of Wood

- Burning Households, Table II]*[% of Wood

- Burning Devices that are Fireplaces = 77.8%, Table VIII]

3 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento, San Joaquin,

and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study", Sections 2.3a and 3.1;

Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

4 Census, 2004 a . U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles

- Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003";

Table 1

- 4; Issued December 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

5 Census, 2003a. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Anaheim

- Santa Ana Metropolitan Area: 2002 ";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

6 Census, 2003b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Riverside

- San Bernardino

- Ontario Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hou sing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

7 Census, 2004b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the San Diego Metropolitan Area: 2002"; Tables 1

- 4, 1

- 6;

Originally Issued July 2003, Update with Errata Issued May 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

8 Census, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau; Characteristics of New Housing; "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses

Completed, Number of Fireplaces" (1973

- 2008) and "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses Sold, Presence of Fireplace"

(1999

- 2008); released July 2009; http://www.census.gov/const/www/charindex_excel.html#singlecomplete

9 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Jo aquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and Education Program";

summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010 board hearing.

County

- level data provided by SJV/Jessica Fierro on 06/07/2011.

10 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;

October 20, 1989.

1 1 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Report, Rule 421, Mandatory Episodic

Curtailment of Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ", App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11; September 7, 2007;

http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rules2007/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

1 2 Total Homes Data Obtained From:

State of California, Department of Finance; E

- 5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001

- 201 0, with 200 0 Benchmark ;

May 20 10 ; http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e

- 5/2001

- 10/documents/E

- 5_2010.xls

Data represent the number of Occupied Housing Units during 2005

. For the San Joaquin district, the data represent the number of Occupied Housing Units during 2003, because they had a moratorium on new wood

- burning

fireplaces after 2003.

For the Bay Ar ea AQMD, housing unit data is from the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), provided by e

- mail

from BAAQMD/Eric Pop to ARB/Monique Davis on 10/5/09.

1 3 Population split for Solano County obtained from YSAQMD/Matt Jones via e

- mail to ARB/M. Davis on 8/11/09:

35% in Sacramento Valley air basin; 65% in San Francisco air basin.

1 4 Population split for Sonoma County obtained from:

BAAQMD, 2007. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; "Workshop Report, Wood Smoke Reduction Program,

Proposed Regulation 6, Rule 3 to Control Particulate Matter and Visible Emissions from Wood

- Burning Devices", page 14;

November, 2007. 87% of Sonoma County in San Francisco air basin.

http://hank.baaqmd.gov/pln/ruledev/6

- 3/0603_wkrpt_100507.pdf



# 7.1 A

- 31 5 Population split for El Dorado County provided by El Dorado County APCD, via 10/10/08 e

- mail from Marcella McTaggart.

1 6 Population split for Placer County provided by Placer County APCD, via 10/10/08 e

- mail from Heather Kuklo.

1 7 For other counties, t he split county fractions were derived using census 2000 data. Current air basin and county map layers were overlaid onto the

C ensus 2000 county tract populations. See ARB/Vivian Lerch e

- mail dated 2/23/09 with file "Population trends 2008.xls".

1 8 Number of fireplaces per home (Mfp) accounts for the fact that some homes have multiple fireplaces.

The estimate of 1.1 fireplaces per home was obtained from the (OMNI, 2003) reference.



# 7.1 A

- 4

## Table A

- 2: Fireplaces

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P fp,cord 

### P fp,aes 

### P fp,heat 

### FP

aes 

### N cord,aes 

### F

aes 

### FP heat 

### N cord,heat 

### F heat 

### F

aes 

### +F heat 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who

used their

fireplaces and

primarily burned

cord wood % of fireplace

use that is for

aesthetic

purposes % of

fireplace

use that is

for heating

purposes # of

fireplaces

being u sed

for a esthetic

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– aesthetics (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord wood

burned in

fireplaces for

a esthetics,

tons/yr # of

fireplaces

being used

for h eating

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– heating (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord w ood

burned in

fireplaces for

h eating,

tons/yr Total cord

wood

burned in

f ireplaces,

tons/yr

GBV GBU Alpine 88.0 59 41 199 0.069 21 138 0.656 140 161 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

GBV GBU Inyo 88.0 59 41 2,127 0.069 226 1,478 0.656 1,493 1,719 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

GBV GBU Mono 88.0 59 41 2,299 0.069 244 1,597 0.656 1,614 1,858 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

LC LAK Lake 88.0 59 41 5,015 0.069 533 3,485 0.656 3,521 4,053 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 88.0 56 44 2,134 0.069 227 1,677 0.656 1,694 1,921 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

LT PLA Placer (LT) 88.0 56 44 901 0.069 96 708 0.656 715 811 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC AMA Amador 88.0 59 41 4,032 0.069 428 2,802 0.656 2,831 3,259 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC CAL Calaveras 88.0 59 41 3,757 0.069 399 2,611 0.656 2,638 3,037 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 88.0 56 44 7,767 0.069 825 6,102 0.656 6,165 6,990 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC MPA Mariposa 88.0 59 41 1,472 0.069 156 1,023 0.656 1,033 1,190 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC NSI Nevada 88.0 59 41 8,123 0.069 863 5,645 0.656 5,703 6,566 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC NSI Plumas 88.0 59 41 3,583 0.069 381 2,490 0.656 2,516 2,896 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC NSI Sierra 88.0 59 41 523 0.069 56 363 0.656 367 422 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC PLA Placer (MC) 88.0 56 44 1,621 0.069 172 1,274 0.656 1,287 1,459 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MC TUO Tuolumne 88.0 59 41 4,462 0.069 474 3,101 0.656 3,132 3,606 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 19,005 57 367 Census, 2004a, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 4, 8

MD KER Kern (MD) 88.0 50.8 49.2 2,167 0.069 230 2,099 0.656 2,120 2,351 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3 9

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 1,712 17 39 Census, 2003B, Table 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

MD MOJ San Bernardino

(MD) 36,129 359 819 Census, 2003B, Table 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

MD SC Riverside (MD) 1,027 10 23 Census, 2003b, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

NC MEN Mendocino 88.0 59 41 10,174 0.069 1,081 7,070 0.656 7,142 8,223 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NC NCU Del Norte 88.0 59 41 3,153 0.069 335 2,191 0.656 2,214 2,549 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NC NCU Humboldt 88.0 59 41 12,871 0.069 1,368 8,944 0.656 9,036 10,404 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NC NCU Trinity 88.0 59 41 2,333 0.069 248 1,621 0.656 1,638 1,886 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 83.9 54 46 2,670 0.619 2,544 2,284 0.619 2,176 4,720 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

NCC MBU Monterey 88.0 59 41 22,156 0.069 2,354 15,397 0.656 15,554 17,909 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NCC MBU San Benito 88.0 59 41 3,108 0.069 330 2,160 0.656 2,182 2,513 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 88.0 59 41 23,310 0.069 2,477 16,198 0.656 16,364 18,841 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NEP LAS Lassen 88.0 59 41 3,558 0.069 378 2,473 0.656 2,498 2,876 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NEP MOD Modoc 88.0 59 41 1,213 0.069 129 843 0.656 851 980 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

NEP SIS Siskiyou 88.0 59 41 6,809 0.069 724 4,732 0.656 4,780 5,504 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 614,483 1,839 12,031 Census, 2004a, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 4, 8

SC SC Orange 307,328 671 5,907 Census, 2003a, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 5, 8

SC SC Riverside (SC) 130,823 1,300 2,965 Census, 2003b, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

SC SC San Bernardino

(SC) 125,971 1,252 2,855 Census, 2003b, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

SCC SB Santa Barbara 88.0 88 12 42,112 0.069 4,475 5,743 0.656 5,801 10,276 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001, p. 1 9, 11



# 7.1 A

- 5

## Table A

- 2: Fireplaces

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P fp,cord 

### P fp,aes 

### P fp,heat 

### FP

aes 

### N cord,aes 

### F

aes 

### FP heat 

### N cord,heat 

### F heat 

### F

aes 

### +F heat 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who

used their

fireplaces and

primarily burned

cord wood % of fireplace

use that is for

aesthetic

purposes % of

fireplace

use that is

for heating

purposes # of

fireplaces

being u sed

for a esthetic

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– aesthetics (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord wood

burned in

fireplaces for

a esthetics,

tons/yr # of

fireplaces

being used

for h eating

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– heating (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord w ood

burned in

fireplaces for

h eating,

tons/yr Total cord

wood

burned in

f ireplaces,

tons/yr

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 88.0 59 41 21,478 0.069 2,282 14,925 0.656 15,078 17,360 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SCC VEN Ventura 88.0 59 41 39,969 0.069 4,247 27,775 0.656 28,059 32,306 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SD SD San Diego 264,722 1,354 5,683 Census, 2004b, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 7, 8

SF BA Alameda 83.9 54 46 46,943 0.369 26,684 40,150 0.369 22,823 49,507 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Contra Costa 83.9 54 46 43,892 0.751 50,785 37,541 0.751 43,436 94,221 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Marin 83.9 54 46 15,275 0.194 4,570 13,065 0.194 3,909 8,479 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Napa 83.9 54 46 5,869 0.536 4,849 5,020 0.536 4,147 8,995 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

S F BA San Francisco 83.9 54 46 21,085 0.103 3,332 18,033 0.103 2,850 6,181 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA San Mateo 83.9 54 46 35,959 0.162 8,996 30,756 0.162 7,694 16,689 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Santa Clara 83.9 54 46 50,106 0.493 38,079 42,855 0.493 32,568 70,647 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Solano (SF) 83.9 54 46 10,692 0.636 10,474 9,145 0.636 8,958 19,433 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 83.9 54 46 18,054 0.619 17,201 15,441 0.619 14,712 31,913 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12;

BAAQMD, 2009 1, 2

SJV SJU Fresno 88.0 59.7 40.3 21,070 0.91 29,528 14,223 0.91 19,933 49,461 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9 , 11, 12

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 88.0 50.8 49.2 10,581 0.91 14,828 10,248 0.91 14,361 29,189 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU Kings 88.0 52.6 47.4 2,159 0.91 3,026 1,946 0.91 2,726 5,752 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU Madera 88.0 21.6 78.4 1,129 0.91 1,582 4,098 0.91 5,743 7,325 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU Merced 88.0 50.0 50.0 4,610 0.91 6,460 4,610 0.91 6,460 12,920 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU San Joaquin 88.0 52.6 47.4 26,059 0.91 36,519 23,483 0.91 32,909 69,428 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU Stanislaus 88.0 61.5 38.5 18,104 0.91 25,371 11,333 0.91 15,882 41,253 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SJV SJU Tulare 88.0 52.6 47.4 10,980 0.91 15,387 9,894 0.91 13,866 29,252 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3; Houck, 2001;

Franz, 1997 9, 11, 12

SS IMP Imperial 88.0 79 21 2,298 0.069 244 626 0.656 632 876 Sierra, 1989, Table D

- 3 9

SS SC Riverside (SS) 35,621 354 807 Census, 2003b, Tables 1

- 4; OMNI, 2006,

Tables 3.22, 4.4 6, 8

SV BUT Butte 88.0 56 44 12,830 0.069 1,363 10,081 0.656 10,184 11,548 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV COL Colusa 88.0 56 44 993 0.069 106 780 0.656 788 894 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV FR Sutter 88.0 56 44 4,469 0.069 475 3,512 0.656 3,548 4,023 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV FR Yuba 88.0 56 44 3,305 0.069 351 2,597 0.656 2,624 2,975 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV GLE Glenn 88.0 56 44 1,427 0.069 152 1,121 0.656 1,133 1,284 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11



# 7.1 A

- 6

## Table A

- 2: Fireplaces

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P fp,cord 

### P fp,aes 

### P fp,heat 

### FP

aes 

### N cord,aes 

### F

aes 

### FP heat 

### N cord,heat 

### F heat 

### F

aes 

### +F heat 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who

used their

fireplaces and

primarily burned

cord wood % of fireplace

use that is for

aesthetic

purposes % of

fireplace

use that is

for heating

purposes # of

fireplaces

being u sed

for a esthetic

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– aesthetics (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord wood

burned in

fireplaces for

a esthetics,

tons/yr # of

fireplaces

being used

for h eating

p urposes # of cords

burned in

fireplaces

– heating (cord/

fireplace/yr) Cord w ood

burned in

fireplaces for

h eating,

tons/yr Total cord

wood

burned in

f ireplaces,

tons/yr

SV PLA Placer (SV) 80.0 69 31 12,237 0.069 1,300 5,498 0.656 5,554 6,854 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 16, Fig. 18 10

SV SAC Sacramento 80.0 69 31 59,365 0.069 6,308 26,671 0.656 26,944 33,252 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 16, Fig. 18 10

SV SHA Shasta 88.0 56 44 10,240 0.069 1,088 8,046 0.656 8,128 9,216 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV TEH Tehama 88.0 56 44 3,364 0.069 357 2,643 0.656 2,670 3,027 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

SV YS Solano (SV) 80.0 69 31 5,860 0.069 623 2,633 0.656 2,660 3,282 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5, Fig. 12; OMNI,

2003, 3.2 1, 3

SV YS Yolo 80.0 69 31 7,830 0.069 832 3,518 0.656 3,554 4,386 OMNI, 2003, 2.5, 3.2; Houck, 2001, p. 1 3, 11

842

, 407

Note s :

P fp,cord : Percent of people who used their fireplaces who primarily used cord wood.

P fp,aes : Percent of fireplace use that is for aesthetic purposes.

P fp,heat : Percent of fireplace use that is for heating purposes.

FP

aes : Number of fireplaces used for aesthetic purposes

F

aes : Amount of c ord wood burned in fireplaces for aesthetics, tons/yr (F

aes = [ FP all ]*[P fp,cord ]*[P fp,aes ]*[N cord,aes ]*[W cord ])

, where N cord,aes = 0.069 cords/fireplace/year; W cord = 1. 54 tons/cord

FP heat : Number of fireplaces used for heating

F heat : Amount of cord wood burned in fireplaces for heating, tons/yr (F heat = [ FP all ]*[P fp,cord ]*[P fp,heat ]*[N cord,heat ]*[W cord ])

, where; N cord, he a t = 0.656 cords/fireplace/year; W cord = 1. 54 tons/cord

[F

aes ]+[F heat ]: Total amount of cord wood burned in fireplaces, tons/yr.

Estimates for South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood Smoke Season", Figures 5 and 12; April 2006;

http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

2 BAAQMD, 2009. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; e

- mail from BAAQMD/Eric Pop to ARB/Monique Davis on 10/5/09.

3 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento, San Joaquin,

and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study", Sections 2.5 and 3.2; Jan. 15, 2003;

http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

4 Census, 2004 a . U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles

- Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003";

Table 1

- 4; Issued December 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

5 Census, 2003a. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Anaheim

- Santa Ana Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

6 Census, 2003b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Riverside

- San Bernardino

- Ontario Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/w ww/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

7 Census, 2004b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the San Diego Metropolitan Area: 2002"; Tables 1

- 4, 1

- 6;

Originally Issued July 2003, Update with Errata Issued May 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

8 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion Emissi on Inventory

South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year", Tables 3.22 and 4.7; October 24, 2006;

http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf

Note: Estimates for South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

9 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency; October 20, 1989.

10 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Report, Rule 421, Mandatory Episodic Curtailment of Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ",

App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11; September 7, 2007; http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rules200 7/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

1 1 Houck, 2001. Houck, James E. (OMNI Consulting, Inc.), "Recommended Procedure for Compiling Emission Inventory Data for Manuf actured Wax/Sawdust Fireplace Logs",

prepared for Roy Huntley (U.S. EPA, OAQPS); October 10, 2001; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/actfire.pdf

12 Franz, 1997. Jennifer D. Franz; JD Franz Research; "San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Residential W ood Combustion Survey, Final Draft Report"; November, 1997.



# 7.1 A

- 7

## Table A

- 3: Fireplaces

– Amount of Manufactured Logs Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ml 

### H fp,ml 

### F ml 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who

used their fireplaces

who primarily used

manufactured logs # of homes with

fireplaces that burn

manufactured l ogs COABDIS share of

all CA homes t hat

burn manufactured

l ogs Manufactured logs

burned in

f ireplaces,

tons/year

GBV GBU Alpine 12.0 42 0% 7 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

GBV GBU Inyo 12.0 447 0% 73 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

GBV GBU Mono 12.0 483 0% 79 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

LC LAK Lake 12.0 1,054 0% 172 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 12.0 473 0% 77 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

LT PLA Placer (LT) 12.0 199 0% 33 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC AMA Amador 12.0 847 0% 138 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC CAL Calaveras 12.0 789 0% 129 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 12.0 1,719 0% 281 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC MPA Mariposa 12.0 309 0% 51 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC NSI Nevada 12.0 1,707 0% 279 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC NSI Plumas 12.0 753 0% 123 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC NSI Sierra 12.0 110 0% 18 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 12.0 359 0% 59 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MC TUO Tuolumne 12.0 937 0% 153 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 12.0 2,287 1% 374 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MD KER Kern (MD) 12.0 529 0% 86 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 12.0 205 0% 34 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 12.0 4,335 1% 708 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

MD SC Riverside (MD) 12.0 123 0% 20 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NC MEN Mendocino 12.0 2,138 1% 349 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NC NCU Del Norte 12.0 663 0% 108 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NC NCU Humboldt 12.0 2,704 1% 442 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NC NCU Trinity 12.0 490 0% 80 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 16.1 862 0% 141 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

NCC MBU Monterey 12.0 4,655 1% 760 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NCC MBU San Benito 12.0 653 0% 107 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 12.0 4,898 1% 800 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NEP LAS Lassen 12.0 748 0% 122 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NEP MOD Modoc 12.0 255 0% 42 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 12.0 1,431 0% 234 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 12.0 73,738 20% 12,045 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SC SC Orange 12.0 36,879 10% 6,024 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SC SC Riverside (SC) 12.0 15,699 4% 2,564 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 12.0 15,117 4% 2,469 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SCC SB Santa Barbara 12.0 6,526 2% 1,066 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 12.0 4,513 1% 737 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SCC VEN Ventura 12.0 8,398 2% 1,372 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SD SD San Diego 12.0 31,767 9% 5,189 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SF BA Alameda 16.1 15,161 4% 2,477 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Contra Costa 16.1 14,176 4% 2,316 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Marin 16.1 4,933 1% 806 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Napa 16.1 1,896 1% 310 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA San Francisco 16.1 6,810 2% 1,112 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA San Mateo 16.1 11,614 3% 1,897 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Santa Clara 16.1 16,183 4% 2,643 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 16.1 3,453 1% 564 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 16.1 5,831 2% 952 BAAQMD, 2006, Fig. 5 

### 1

SJV SJU Fresno 12.0 4,375 1% 715 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 12.0 2,582 1% 422 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Kings 12.0 509 0% 83 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Madera 12.0 648 0% 106 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Merced 12.0 1,143 0% 187 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU San Joaquin 12.0 6,142 2% 1,003 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Stanislaus 12.0 3,649 1% 596 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SJV SJU Tulare 12.0 2,588 1% 423 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SS IMP Imperial 12.0 362 0% 59 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SS SC Riverside (SS) 12.0 4,274 1% 698 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV BUT Butte 12.0 2,840 1% 464 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2



# 7.1 A

- 8

## Table A

- 3: Fireplaces

– Amount of Manufactured Logs Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ml 

### H fp,ml 

### F ml 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who

used their fireplaces

who primarily used

manufactured logs # of homes with

fireplaces that burn

manufactured l ogs COABDIS share of

all CA homes t hat

burn manufactured

l ogs Manufactured logs

burned in

f ireplaces,

tons/year

SV COL Colusa 12.0 220 0% 36 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV FR Sutter 12.0 989 0% 162 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV FR Yuba 12.0 732 0% 120 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV GLE Glenn 12.0 316 0% 52 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV PLA Placer (SV) 20.0 4,031 1% 658 SMAQMD, 2007, Fig. 18 

### 3

SV SAC Sacramento 20.0 19,554 5% 3,194 SMAQMD, 2007, Fig. 18 

### 3

SV SHA Shasta 12.0 2,267 1% 370 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV TEH Tehama 12.0 745 0% 122 Houck, 2001a, p.1 

### 2

SV YS Solano (SV) 20.0 1,930 1% 315 SMAQMD, 2007, Fig. 18 

### 3

SV YS Yolo 20.0 2,579 1% 421 SMAQMD, 2007, Fig. 18 

### 3

372,371 100% 60,825

Note s :

Estimated Statewide Total Sales in 2005 (60,825 tons/yr) was distributed to counties based on "% of Homes with FPs That Burn Mfd. Logs".

P ml : Percent of people who used their fireplaces who used manufactured logs.

H fp,ml : Number of homes with fireplaces that burn manufactured wax/sawdust logs. [H fp,ml ] = [ H fp,u ]*[P ml ] , where H fp,u is number of homes with fireplaces that are

actually being used.

[COABDIS Share] = [H fp,ml, each COABDIS combination ]/[H fp,ml, statewide total ]

F ml : Amount of manufactured wax/sawdust logs burned in fireplaces, tons/year = [Statewide Total Sales, tpy]*[COABDIS Share]

.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood

Smoke Season", Figure 5; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

2 Houck, 2001a. Houck, James E. (OMNI Consulting, Inc.), "Recommended Procedure for Compiling Emission

Inventory Data for Manufactured Wax/Sawdus t Fireplace Logs", prepared for Roy Huntley (U.S. EPA, OAQPS);

October 10, 2001; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/actfire.pdf

This reference was used for the default estimate that 12% of fireplaces primarily burn manufactured logs.

3 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Report, Rule 421,

Mandatory Episodic Curtailment of Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ", App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11; September 7, 2007;

http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rule s2007/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

4 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion

Emission Inventory South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year",

Tables 3.22 and 4.7; October 24, 2006; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf

Statewide 2005 sales of manufactured logs was estimated, based on 1999 sales data (OMNI, 2006),

that was grown to 2005, using housing unit data from the California Department of Finance.

CA DOF, E

- 5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001

- 2010, May 2010.

http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e

- 5/2001

- 10/documents/E

- 5_2010.xls

CA DOF, E

- 8 Historical Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 1990

- 2000. August 2007.

http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demograph ic/reports/estimates/e

- 8/documents/E

- 8_90

- 00main.xls



# 7.1 A

- 9

## Table A

- 4: Wood Stoves

– Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P

w 

### P

w,u 

### [P

w 

### ]x[P

w,u 

### ] H

w,u 

### Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

with wood

stoves % of homes

that use their

wood stoves % of homes with

wood stoves that

are in use # o f homes

with wood

stoves in use

GBV GBU Alpine 528 11.4

- 11.4 60 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Inyo 7,808 8.2

- 8.2 641 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Mono 5,774 12.0

- 12.0 693 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

LC LAK Lake 24,790 12.2

- 12.2 3,024 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 14,220 18.0 85 15.3 2,176 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

LT PLA Placer (LT) 6,000 18.0 85 15.3 918 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

MC AMA Amador 13,961 19.9

- 19.9 2,778 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

MC CAL Calaveras 18,573 24.3

- 24.3 4,513 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 51,742 18.0 85 15.3 7,917 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

MC MPA Mariposa 7,276 15 83 12.5 906 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

MC NSI Nevada 40,157 15.5

- 15.5 6,224 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

MC NSI Plumas 9,775 28.0

- 28.0 2,737 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

MC NSI Sierra 1,568 10.1

- 10.1 158 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 10,799 18.0 85 15.3 1,652 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

MC TUO Tuolumne 22,056 25.8

- 25.8 5,690 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 96,033 488 Census, 2004a, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 8,10

MD KER Kern (MD) 37,223 4.0 37 1.5 551 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 6,583 136 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 125,319 3,070 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

MD SC Riverside (MD) 3,591 82 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

NC MEN Mendocino 34,798 22.8

- 22.8 7,934 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NC NCU Del Norte 9,513 16.5

- 16.5 1,570 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NC NCU Humboldt 53,152 17.0

- 17.0 9,036 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NC NCU Trinity 5,739 12.3

- 12.3 704 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 23,511 21.5 40.9 8.8 2,067 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

NCC MBU Monterey 126,559 3.0

- 1.2 3,797 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NCC MBU San Benito 16,980 5.2

- 5.2 883 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 94,693 6.7

- 6.7 6,344 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NEP LAS Lassen 10,214 26.5

- 26.5 2,707 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

NEP MOD Modoc 3,978 9.2

- 9.2 366 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 19,472 25.3

- 25.3 4,926 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 3,105,059 15,792 Census, 2004a, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 8,10

SC SC Orange 977,547 2,640 Census, 2003a, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,10

SC SC Riverside (SC) 463,188 10,379 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 444,312 10,705 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

SCC SB Santa Barbara 143,106 4.2

- 4.2 6,010 Sierra, 1989; Table E

- 3 12

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 100,494 4.2

- 4.2 4,221 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

SCC VEN Ventura 258,483 0.5

- 0.5 1,292 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

SD SD San Diego 1,056,548 20,790 Census, 2004b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 9,10

SF BA Alameda 542,540 2.7 32.2 0.9 4,717 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Contra Costa 368,770 4.7 35.7 1.7 6,188 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Marin 103,250 14.2 46.6 6.6 6,832 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Napa 49,290 9.7 39.1 9.7 1,869 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA San Francisco 338,700 2.6 27.8 0.7 2,448 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA San Mateo 261,280 7.0 40.2 2.8 7,352 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Santa Clara 595,550 6.7 27.9 1.9 11,133 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 101,410 7.0 33.9 2.4 2,406 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 158,970 21.5 40.9 8.8 13,979 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SJV SJU Fresno 261,554 5.0 34 1.7 4,446 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 181,734 4.0 37 1.5 2,690 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kings 35,812 4.0 37 1.5 530 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Madera 38,051 9.0 43 3.9 1,473 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Merced 67,116 9.0 43 3.9 2,597 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU San Joaquin 193,423 4.0 49 2.0 3,791 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Stanislaus 153,742 8.0 43 3.4 5,289 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Tulare 114,640 11.0 57 6.3 7,188 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SS IMP Imperial 43,771 0.3

- 0.3 131 Census, 2007; Table B25040 3

SS SC Riverside (SS) 125,073 2,799 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,10

SV BUT Butte 85,478 18.0 85 15.3 13,078 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV COL Colusa 6,617 18.0 85 15.3 1,012 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV FR Sutter 29,776 18.0 85 15.3 4,556 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV FR Yuba 22,021 18.0 85 15.3 3,369 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV GLE Glenn 9,506 18.0 85 15.3 1,454 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV PLA Placer (SV) 103,191 5 63 3.2 3,251 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 11

SV SAC Sacramento 500,604 5 63 3.2 15,769 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 11

SV SHA Shasta 68,220 18.0 85 15.3 10,438 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4



# 7.1 A

- 10

## Table A

- 4: Wood Stoves

– Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P

w 

### P

w,u 

### [P

w 

### ]x[P

w,u 

### ] H

w,u 

### Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

with wood

stoves % of homes

that use their

wood stoves % of homes with

wood stoves that

are in use # o f homes

with wood

stoves in use

SV TEH Tehama 22,410 18.0 85 15.3 3,429 OMNI, 2003; 2.3b, 4.1 4

SV YS Solano (SV) 49,415 5 63 3.2 1,557 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 11

SV YS Yolo 66,027 5 63 3.2 2,080 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 11

12,149,062 304,428

Notes:

P

w : Percent of homes with wood stoves.

P

w,u : Percent of homes that use their wood stove.

H

w,u : Number of homes with wood stoves actually being used. H

w,u = [H total ]*[P

w ]*[P

w,u ]

Note: Estimates for South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood

Smoke Season", Figures 2 and 15; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

2 NCRA, 1988. Northern California Research Associates; "Draft Report, The California Residential Wood Consumption Survey", Tables II and VIII; May 1988.

For the NCRA report, [% of Hom es with a Wood Stove] = [% of Wood

- Burning Households, Table II]*[% of Wood

- Burning Devices that are Wood Stoves = 13.4%, Table VIII]

3 U.S. Census, 2007. United States Census; "American Community Survey 3

- Year Estimates, 2005

- 2007"; Table B25040 (House Heating Fuel);

obtained 6/24/09 from website http://factfinder.census.gov

. Note: It is assumed that the % of homes that use wood for heating fuel

is the same as the % of homes with wood stoves. It is also assumed that the percentage assigned to wood stoves includes pellet stoves.

4 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento,

San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas, University of Cali fornia Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study",

Sections 2.3b and 4.1; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

5 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010 board hearing.

County

- lev el data provided by SJV/Jessica Fierro on 06/07/2011.

6 Census, 2003a. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Anaheim

- Santa Ana Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolita ndata.html

7 Census, 2003b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Riverside

- San Bernardino

- Ontario Metropolitan

Area: 2002"; Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

8 Census, 2004 a . U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles

- Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003";

Table 1

- 4; Issued December 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

9 Census, 2004b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the San Diego Metropolitan Area: 2002"; Tables 1

- 4, 1

- 6;

Originally Issued July 2003, Update with Errata Issued May 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/h ousing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

10 Census, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau; Characteristics of New Housing; "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses

Completed, Number of Fireplaces" (1973

- 2008) and "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses Sold, Presence of Fireplace"

(1999

- 2008); released July 2009; http://www.census.gov/const/www/charindex_excel.html#singlecomplete

1 1 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Report, Rule 421, Mandatory Episodic

Curtailment o f Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ", App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11; September 7, 2007;

http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rules2007/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

1 2 Total Homes Data Obtained From:

State of California, Department of Finance; E

- 5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, 2001

- 201 0, with 2000 Benchmark ;

May 20 10 ; http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e

- 5/2001

- 10/documents/E

- 5_2010.xls

Data represent the number of Occupied Housing Units during 2005

For the San Joaquin district, the data represent the number of Occupied Housing Units during 2003, because they had a

moratorium on new wood

- burning fireplaces after 2003.

1 3 Population split for Solano and Sonoma counties obtained from:

BAAQMD, 2007. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; "Workshop Report, Wood Smoke Reduction Program,

Proposed Regulation 6, Rule 3 to Control Particulate Matter and Visible Emissions from Wood

- Burning Devices", page 14;

November, 2007. http://www.baaqmd.gov/pln/ruledev/6

- 3/0603_wkrpt_100507.pdf



# 7.1 A

- 11

## Table A

- 5: Wood Stoves

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ph 

### P

c 

### N cord 

### F

w 

### F

w,con 

### F w,cat 

### F w,ncat 

### Reference Ref.

% of wood stoves

that are Phase II

(i.e., purchased

after 1 July 1990) % of Phase

II wood

stoves that

are catalytic # of cords of

wood burned in

wood stoves

(cords/home/yr) Total cord

wood burned in

wood s toves,

tons/year Cord wood burned

in conventional

wood s toves,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in Phase

II catalytic wood

s toves, tons/year Cord wood burned

in Phase II n on

catalytic wood

s toves, tons/year

GBV GBU Alpine 46.0 24.0 1.5 139 75 15 48 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

GBV GBU Inyo 46.0 24.0 1.5 1,482 800 164 518 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

GBV GBU Mono 46.0 24.0 1.5 1,601 865 177 560 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

LC LAK Lake 46.0 24.0 1.5 6,986 3,773 771 2,442 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 43.0 17.0 1.5 5,026 2,865 367 1,794 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

LT PLA Placer (LT) 43.0 17.0 1.5 2,120 1,209 155 757 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC AMA Amador 46.0 24.0 1.5 6,418 3,466 709 2,244 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC CAL Calaveras 46.0 24.0 1.5 10,426 5,630 1,151 3,645 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 43.0 17.0 1.5 18,287 10,424 1,337 6,527 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC MPA Mariposa 46.0 24.0 1.5 2,093 1,130 231 732 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC NSI Nevada 46.0 24.0 1.5 14,378 7,764 1,587 5,027 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC NSI Plumas 46.0 24.0 1.5 6,322 3,414 698 2,210 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC NSI Sierra 46.0 24.0 1.5 364 197 40 127 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 43.0 17.0 1.5 3,817 2,176 279 1,362 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MC TUO Tuolumne 46.0 24.0 1.5 13,145 7,098 1,451 4,595 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 21.0 33 0.95 715 564 50 101 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD KER Kern (MD) 35.2 8.7 1.57 1,332 863 41 428 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 6 4, 5

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 21.0 33 0.95 199 157 14 28 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 21.0 33 0.95 4,492 3,548 311 632 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD SC Riverside (MD) 21.0 33 0.95 119 94 8 17 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

NC MEN Mendocino 46.0 24.0 1.5 18,327 9,897 2,023 6,407 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NC NCU Del Norte 46.0 24.0 1.5 3,626 1,958 400 1,268 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NC NCU Humboldt 43.0 17.0 1.5 20,873 11,897 1,526 7,449 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NC NCU Trinity 46.0 24.0 1.5 1,625 878 179 568 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 62.6 29.0 2.18 6,951 2,600 1,262 3,089 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

NCC MBU Monterey 46.0 24.0 1.5 8,771 4,736 968 3,066 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NCC MBU San Benito 46.0 24.0 1.5 2,040 1,101 225 713 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 46.0 24.0 1.5 14,656 7,914 1,618 5,124 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NEP LAS Lassen 46.0 24.0 1.5 6,253 3,376 690 2,186 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NEP MOD Modoc 46.0 24.0 1.5 845 456 93 295 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 46.0 24.0 1.5 11,380 6,145 1,256 3,978 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 21.0 33 0.95 23,103 18,251 1,601 3,251 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Orange 21.0 33 0.95 3,862 3,051 268 543 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Riverside (SC) 21.0 33 0.95 15,184 11,996 1,052 2,136 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 21.0 33 0.95 15,661 12,372 1,085 2,204 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SCC SB Santa Barbara 46.0 24.0 1.5 13,884 7,497 1,533 4,854 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 46.0 24.0 1.5 9,750 5,265 1,076 3,409 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SCC VEN Ventura 46.0 24.0 1.5 2,985 1,612 330 1,044 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SD SD San Diego 21.0 33 0.95 30,416 24,028 2,108 4,279 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SF BA Alameda 62.6 29.0 0.14 990 370 180 440 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA Contra Costa 62.6 29.0 3.04 28,939 10,823 5,254 12,862 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA Marin 62.6 29.0 3.44 36,179 13,531 6,568 16,080 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA Napa 62.6 29.0 4.31 12,414 4,643 2,254 5,517 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA San Francisco 62.6 29.0 0.25 927 347 168 412 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA San Mateo 62.6 29.0 1.05 11,921 4,458 2,164 5,298 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2



# 7.1 A

- 12

## Table A

- 5: Wood Stoves

– Amount of Cord Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ph 

### P

c 

### N cord 

### F

w 

### F

w,con 

### F w,cat 

### F w,ncat 

### Reference Ref.

% of wood stoves

that are Phase II

(i.e., purchased

after 1 July 1990) % of Phase

II wood

stoves that

are catalytic # of cords of

wood burned in

wood stoves

(cords/home/yr) Total cord

wood burned in

wood s toves,

tons/year Cord wood burned

in conventional

wood s toves,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in Phase

II catalytic wood

s toves, tons/year Cord wood burned

in Phase II n on

catalytic wood

s toves, tons/year

SF BA Santa Clara 62.6 29.0 1.24 21,194 7,927 3,848 9,420 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA Solano (SF) 62.6 29.0 0.50 1,851 692 336 823 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 62.6 29.0 2.18 46,999 17,578 8,532 20,889 BAAQMD, 2009; OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 1, 2

SJV SJU Fresno 35.2 8.7 2.09 14,311 9,274 438 4,599 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 35.2 8.7 1.57 6,503 4,214 199 2,090 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 6 4, 5

SJV SJU Kings 35.2 8.7 1.16 947 614 29 304 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU Madera 35.2 8.7 2.61 5,919 3,835 181 1,902 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU Merced 35.2 8.7 2.67 10,680 6,921 327 3,432 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU San Joaquin 35.2 8.7 1.15 6,714 4,351 206 2,158 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU Stanislaus 35.2 8.7 1.55 12,624 8,180 387 4,057 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SJV SJU Tulare 35.2 8.7 2.40 26,567 17,215 814 8,538 Franz, 1997, Tables 6, 7; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 4, 5

SS IMP Imperial 21.0 33.0 0.07 14 11 1 2 OMNI, 2006; 3.17; Sierra, 1989, Table E

- 4 3, 5

SS SC Riverside (SS) 21.0 33 0.95 4,094 3,234 284 576 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SV BUT Butte 43.0 17.0 1.5 30,210 17,220 2,208 10,782 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV COL Colusa 43.0 17.0 1.5 2,339 1,333 171 835 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV FR Sutter 43.0 17.0 1.5 10,524 5,999 769 3,756 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV FR Yuba 43.0 17.0 1.5 7,783 4,436 569 2,778 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV GLE Glenn 43.0 17.0 1.5 3,360 1,915 246 1,199 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV PLA Placer (SV) 43.0 17.0 1.5 7,509 4,280 549 2,680 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV SAC Sacramento 43.0 17.0 1.5 36,426 20,763 2,663 13,001 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV SHA Shasta 43.0 17.0 1.5 24,111 13,743 1,763 8,605 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV TEH Tehama 43.0 17.0 1.5 7,920 4,515 579 2,827 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV YS Solano (SV) 43.0 17.0 1.5 3,596 2,050 263 1,283 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

SV YS Yolo 43.0 17.0 1.5 4,804 2,739 351 1,715 OMNI, 2003; 4.5, 4.6, 4.2 2

698,021 388,353 71,150 238,518

Notes:

P ph : Percent of wood stoves that are EPA certified Phase II (i.e., purchased after 1 July 1990).

P

c : Percent of Phase II wood stoves that are catalytic.

N cord : Number of cords of wood burned in wood stoves (cords/home/yr).

W cord = Weight of an a verage c ord of w ood in California = 1.54 tons/cord (OMNI, 2006)

F

w : Total amount of cord wood burned in wood s toves, tons/year. [F

w ] = [H

w,u ]*[N cord ]*[W cord ] , where H

w,u is the number of homes with wood stoves actually being used

. F

w,con : Amount of cord wood burned in conventional wood stoves, tons/year. [F

w,con ] = [F

w ]*[100%

- P ph ]

F w,cat : Amount of cord wood burned in EPA certified Phase II catalytic wood stoves, tons/year. [F w,cat ] = [F

w ]*[P ph ]*[P

c ]

F w,ncat : Amount of cord wood burned in EPA certified Phase II non

- catalytic wood stoves, tons/year. [F w,ncat ] = [F

w ]*[P ph ]*[100%

- P

c ]

Estimates for South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

Reference s :

1 BAAQMD, 2009. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; e

- mail from BAAQMD/Eric Pop to ARB/Monique Davis on 10/5/09.

2 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento, San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas,

University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study", Sections 4.5, 4.6, 4 .2; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

3 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion Emission Inventory South Coast Air Basin and

Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year", Tables 3.20 and 4.1; October 24, 2006; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf

Note: Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

4 Fr anz, 1997. Jennifer D. Franz; JD Franz Research; "San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District, Residential Woo d Combustion Survey, Final Draft Report"; November, 1997.

5 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood U se in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; October 20, 1989.



# 7.1 A

- 13

## Table A

- 6: Fireplace Inserts

– Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P fi 

### P fi,u 

### [P fi 

### ]x[P fi,u 

### ] H fi,u 

### Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

w/ fireplace

inserts % of homes that

use their

fireplace inserts % of homes

w/fireplace

inserts in use # of h omes

w/fireplace

inserts in use

GBV GBU Alpine 528 6.4

- 6.4 34 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Inyo 7,808 4.7

- 4.7 364 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Mono 5,774 6.8

- 6.8 393 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

LC LAK Lake 24,790 4.9 97 4.8 1,178 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 14,220 6.0 100 6.0 853 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

LT PLA Placer (LT) 6,000 6.0 100 6.0 360 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC AMA Amador 13,961 4.9

- 4.9 690 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC CAL Calaveras 18,573 4.9 97 4.8 883 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 51,742 6.0 100 6.0 3,105 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC MPA Mariposa 7,276 4.9 97 4.8 346 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC NSI Nevada 40,157 4.9 97 4.8 1,909 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC NSI Plumas 9,775 6.3

- 6.3 613 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC NSI Sierra 1,568 5.7

- 5.7 89 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 10,799 6.0 100 6.0 648 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MC TUO Tuolumne 22,056 4.9 97 4.8 1,048 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 96,033 2,247 Census, 2004a; Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,8

MD KER Kern (MD) 37,223 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 6,583 336 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 125,319 7,582 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

MD SC Riverside (MD) 3,591 201 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

NC MEN Mendocino 34,798 5.0

- 5.0 1,740 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Del Norte 9,513 5.7

- 5.7 539 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Humboldt 53,152 4.1

- 4.1 2,202 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NCU Trinity 5,739 7.0

- 7.0 399 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 23,511 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

NCC MBU Monterey 126,559 3.0

- 3.0 3,790 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NCC MBU San Benito 16,980 3.1

- 3.1 532 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 94,693 4.2

- 4.2 3,987 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP LAS Lassen 10,214 6.0

- 6.0 609 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP MOD Modoc 3,978 5.2

- 5.2 207 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 19,472 6.0

- 6.0 1,165 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 3,105,059 72,653 Census, 2004a; Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,8

SC SC Orange 977,547 32,100 Census, 2003a, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 4,8

SC SC Riverside (SC) 463,188 25,632 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 444,312 26,437 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

SCC SB Santa Barbara 143,106 0.8

- 0.8 1,145 Sierra, 1989; Table E

- 3 9

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 100,494 3.7

- 3.7 3,674 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SCC VEN Ventura 258,483 2.6

- 2.6 6,836 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

SD SD San Diego 1,056,548 56,540 Census, 2004b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,8

SF BA Alameda 542,540 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Contra Costa 368,770 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Marin 103,250 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Napa 49,290 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Francisco 338,700 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Mateo 261,280 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Santa Clara 595,550 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 101,410 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 158,970 0

- 0.0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SJV SJU Fresno 261,554 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 181,734 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Kings 35,812 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Madera 38,051 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Merced 67,116 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU San Joaquin 193,423 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Stanislaus 153,742 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Tulare 114,640 0

- 0.0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SS IMP Imperial 43,771 0.6

- 0.6 263 Sierra, 1989; Table E

- 3 9

SS SC Riverside (SS) 125,073 6,911 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,8

SV BUT Butte 85,478 6.0 100 6.0 5,129 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV COL Colusa 6,617 6.0 100 6.0 397 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV FR Sutter 29,776 6.0 100 6.0 1,787 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV FR Yuba 22,021 6.0 100 6.0 1,321 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV GLE Glenn 9,506 6.0 100 6.0 570 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV PLA Placer (SV) 103,191 16 63 10.1 10,402 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 10

SV SAC Sacramento 500,604 16 63 10.1 50,461 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 10

SV SHA Shasta 68,220 6.0 100 6.0 4,093 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3

SV TEH Tehama 22,410 6.0 100 6.0 1,345 OMNI, 2003; 2.3c, 5.1 3



# 7.1 A

- 14

## Table A

- 6: Fireplace Inserts

– Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P fi 

### P fi,u 

### [P fi 

### ]x[P fi,u 

### ] H fi,u 

### Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes

w/ fireplace

inserts % of homes that

use their

fireplace inserts % of homes

w/fireplace

inserts in use # of h omes

w/fireplace

inserts in use

SV YS Solano (SV) 49,415 16 63 10.1 4,981 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 10

SV YS Yolo 66,027 16 63 10.1 6,656 SMAQMD, 2007; App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11 10

12,149,062 357,380

Notes:

P fi : Percent of homes with fireplace inserts.

P fi,u : Percent of homes that use their fireplace insert.

H fi,u : Number of homes with fireplace inserts actually being used. H fi,u = [H total ]*[P fi ]*[P fi,u ]

Note: Estimates for South Coast counties based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood

Smoke Season", Figures 2 and 15; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Fireplace Inserts.

2 NCRA, 1988. Northern California Research Associates; "Draft Report, The California Residential Wood Consumption Survey", Tables II and VIII; May 1988.

For the NCRA report, [% of Homes with a Wood

- Burning Fireplace] = [% of Wood

- Bur ning Households, Table II]*[% of Wood

- Burning Devices that are Fireplaces = 77.8%, Table VIII]

For the NCRA report, [% of Homes with a Wood Stove] = [% of Wood

- Burning Households, Table II]*[% of Wood

- Burning Devices that are Wood Stoves = 13.4%, Table VIII]

3 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento,

San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study",

Sections 2.3c and 5.1; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

4 Census, 2003a. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Anaheim

- Santa Ana Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Fireplace Inserts.

5 Census, 2003b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Riverside

- San Bernardino

- Ontario Metropolitan

Area: 2002"; Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Fireplace Inserts.

6 Census, 2004 a . U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles

- Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003";

Table 1

- 4; Issued December 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Fireplace Inserts.

7 Cen sus, 2004b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the San Diego Metropolitan Area: 2002"; Tables 1

- 4, 1

- 6;

Originally Issued July 2003, Update with Errata Issued May 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

8 Census, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau; Characteristics of New Housing; "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses

Completed, Number of Fireplaces" (1973

- 2008) and "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses Sold, Presence of Fireplace"

(1999

- 2008); released July 2009; http://www.census.gov/const/www/charindex_excel.html#singlecomplete

9 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Re search, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Tables E

- 3, D

- 3, 17, E

- 4; October 20, 1989.

10 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Report, Rule 421, Mandatory Episodic

Curtailment of Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ", App. D, Fig. 3, Fig. 11; September 7, 2007;

http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rules 2007/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

1 1 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010

board hearing. Assume "Wood Stoves" include Fireplace Inserts.



# 7.1 A

- 15

## Table A

- 7 : Fireplace Insert s

– Amount of Cord Wood & Bundle Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ph 

### P

c 

### N cord 

### P fi,bundle 

### N bundle 

### F fi,cord 

### F fi,con 

### F fi,cat 

### F fi,ncat 

### F fi,bundle 

### F fi,con 

### F fi,cat 

### F fi,ncat 

### Reference Ref.

% of

fireplace

i nserts that

are Phase II

( purchased

after 1 July

1990) % of

Phase II

fireplace

inserts

that are

catalytic # of cords

of wood

burned in

fireplace

inserts

(cords/

home/yr) % of people

with fireplace

inserts who

use bundles in

addition to

cord wood # of bundles

of wood

burned in

fireplace

inserts

(bundles/

home/yr) Total

cord

wood

b urned in

f ireplace

i nserts,

t ons/year Cord wood

burned in

c onven tional

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in

Phase II

c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in

Phase II

non

- c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Total

bundles

burned in

fireplace

i nserts,

to ns/year Bundles

burned in

conventional

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Bundles

burned in

Phase II

c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Bundles

burned in

Phase II

non

- catalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year

GBV GBU Alpine 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 73 40 10 23 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

GBV GBU Inyo 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 784 424 112 249 2 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

GBV GBU Mono 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 848 458 121 269 2 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

LC LAK Lake 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 2,540 1,372 362 806 6 3 1 2 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 1,577 867 355 355 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

LT PLA Placer (LT) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 665 366 150 150 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC AMA Amador 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,487 803 212 472 3 2 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC CAL Calaveras 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,903 1,028 271 604 4 2 1 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 5,737 3,155 1,291 1,291 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC MPA Mariposa 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 746 403 106 237 2 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC NSI Nevada 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 4,115 2,222 587 1,306 9 5 1 3 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC NSI Plumas 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,321 714 188 419 3 2 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC NSI Sierra 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 193 104 27 61 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 1,197 659 269 269 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MC TUO Tuolumne 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 2,260 1,220 322 717 5 3 1 2 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 21.0 33 549 434 38 77 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD KER Kern (MD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 21.0 33 53 42 4 7 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 21.0 33 1,190 940 82 167 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD SC Riverside (MD) 21.0 33 32 25 2 4 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

NC MEN Mendocino 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 3,752 2,026 535 1,191 9 5 1 3 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NC NCU Del Norte 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,163 628 166 369 3 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NC NCU Humboldt 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 4,747 2,563 677 1,507 11 6 2 3 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NC NCU Trinity 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 860 465 123 273 2 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,1 5 1

NCC MBU Monterey 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 8,171 4,412 1,165 2,593 19 10 3 6 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NCC MBU San Benito 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,146 619 163 364 3 1 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 8,596 4,642 1,226 2,728 20 11 3 6 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NEP LAS Lassen 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 1,312 709 187 416 3 2 0 1 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NEP MOD Modoc 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 447 241 64 142 1 1 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 2,511 1,356 358 797 6 3 1 2 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 21.0 33 17,757 14,028 1,231 2,498 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Orange 21.0 33 3,752 2,964 260 528 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Riverside (SC) 21.0 33 4,022 3,178 279 566 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 21.0 33 4,149 3,277 287 584 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SCC SB Santa Barbara 46.0 31.0 1.4 0 0 2,468 1,333 352 783 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 7,920 4,277 1,129 2,514 18 10 3 6 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SCC VEN Ventura 46.0 31.0 1.4 9.4 2.2 14,739 7,959 2,102 4,678 34 18 5 11 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SD SD San Diego 21.0 33 9,440 7,458 654 1,328 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SF BA Alameda 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Contra Costa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Marin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Napa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA San Francisco 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1



# 7.1 A

- 16

## Table A

- 7 : Fireplace Insert s

– Amount of Cord Wood & Bundle Wood Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P ph 

### P

c 

### N cord 

### P fi,bundle 

### N bundle 

### F fi,cord 

### F fi,con 

### F fi,cat 

### F fi,ncat 

### F fi,bundle 

### F fi,con 

### F fi,cat 

### F fi,ncat 

### Reference Ref.

% of

fireplace

i nserts that

are Phase II

( purchased

after 1 July

1990) % of

Phase II

fireplace

inserts

that are

catalytic # of cords

of wood

burned in

fireplace

inserts

(cords/

home/yr) % of people

with fireplace

inserts who

use bundles in

addition to

cord wood # of bundles

of wood

burned in

fireplace

inserts

(bundles/

home/yr) Total

cord

wood

b urned in

f ireplace

i nserts,

t ons/year Cord wood

burned in

c onven tional

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in

Phase II

c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Cord wood

burned in

Phase II

non

- c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Total

bundles

burned in

fireplace

i nserts,

to ns/year Bundles

burned in

conventional

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Bundles

burned in

Phase II

c atalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year Bundles

burned in

Phase II

non

- catalytic

fireplace

i nserts,

tons/year

SF BA San Mateo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Santa Clara 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2,15 1

SJV SJU Fresno 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Madera 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Merced 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU San Joaquin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Stanislaus 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Tulare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SS IMP Imperial 21.0 33.0 0.25 0 0 101 80 7 14 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17; Sierra,

1989, Table E

- 4 3, 4

SS SC Riverside (SS) 21.0 33 1,085 857 75 153 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SV BUT Butte 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 9,478 5,213 2,133 2,133 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV COL Colusa 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 734 404 165 165 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV FR Sutter 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 3,302 1,816 743 743 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV FR Yuba 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 2,442 1,343 549 549 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV GLE Glenn 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 1,054 580 237 237 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV PLA Placer (SV) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 19,222 10,572 4,325 4,325 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV SAC Sacramento 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 93,252 51,288 20,982 20,982 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV SHA Shasta 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 7,564 4,160 1,702 1,702 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV TEH Tehama 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 2,485 1,367 559 559 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV YS Solano (SV) 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 9,205 5,063 2,071 2,071 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

SV YS Yolo 45.0 50.0 1.2 0 0 12,299 6,765 2,767 2,767 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2003; 5.5, 5.6, 5.2 2

286,445 166,915 51,785 67,746



### Notes:

P ph : Percent of fireplace inserts that are EPA certified Phase II (i.e., purchased after 1 July 1990).

P

c : Percent of fireplace inserts that are catalytic.

N cord : Number of cords of wood burned in fireplace inserts (cords/h ome/yr).

W cord = Weight of an average cord of wood in California = 1.54 tons/cord (OMNI, 2006)

P fi,bundle : Percent of people with fireplaces who use bundles in addition to cord wood.

N bundle : Number of bundles of wood burned in fireplace inserts (bundles/home/yr).

W bundle = Weight of an Average Bundle of Wood (ton/bundle) (assuming 1 bundle = 1/64 of a cord) = 0.024 ton/bundle (OMNI, 2003)

F fi,cord : Total amount of cord wood burned in fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,cord ] = [H fi,u ]*[N cord ]*[W cord ], where H fi,u is number of homes with fireplace inserts actually being used.

F fi,con : A mount of cord wood burned in convention al fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,con ] = [F fi,cord ]*[100%

- P ph ]

F fi,cat : Amount of cord wood burned in EPA certified P hase II catalytic fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,cat ] = [F fi,cord ]*[P ph ]*[P

c ]

F fi,ncat : Amount of cord wood burned in EPA certified Phase II non

- catalytic fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,ncat ] = [F fi,cord ]*[P ph ]*[100%

- P

c ]

F fi,bundle : Total amount of bundle wood burned in fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi, bundle ] = [H fi,u ]*[N bundle ]*[W bundle ] , where H fi,u is number of homes with fireplace inserts actually being used.

F fi,con ,b : Amount of bundle wood burned in conventional fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,con,b ] = [F fi,bundle ]*[100%

- P ph ]

F fi,cat , b : Amount of bundle wood burned in EPA certified Phase II catalytic fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,cat,b ] = [F fi,bundle ]*[P ph ]*[P

c ]

F fi,ncat , b : Amount of bundle wood burned in EPA certified Phase II non

- catalytic fireplace inserts, tons/year. [F fi,ncat,b ] = [F fi,bundle ]*[P ph ]*[100%

- P

c ]



# 7.1 A

- 17Reference:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood Smoke Season", Figures 2 and 15;

April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.

2 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento, San Joaquin,

and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study", Sections 5.5, 5.6, 5.2;

Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

3 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion Emission Inventory South Coast Air Basin

and Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year", Tables 2.2 and 3.21; October 24, 2006; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf

Note: Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties are based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.

4 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; October 20, 1989

. 5 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010 board hearing. Assume cord wood usage for "Wood

Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.



# 7.1 A

- 18

## Table A

- 8: Fireplace Inserts

– Amount of Compressed Wood Logs Burned

AB Dis County (AB) P cwl 

### N cwl 

### H fi,cwl 

### F fi,cwl 

### Reference Ref.

% of people who used

their fireplace inserts

with compressed wood

logs # of compressed

wood logs burned in

fireplace inserts

(logs/home/yr) # of homes with

f ireplace inserts that

burn compressed wood

l ogs Compressed w ood

logs b urned in

f ireplace i nserts,

tons/year

GBV GBU Alpine 3.1 30 1 0.1 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

GBV GBU Inyo 3.1 30 11 0.8 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

GBV GBU Mono 3.1 30 12 0.9 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

LC LAK Lake 3.1 30 37 2.7 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 7.7 30 66 4.9 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

LT PLA Placer (LT) 7.7 30 28 2.1 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC AMA Amador 3.1 30 21 1.6 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC CAL Calaveras 3.1 30 27 2.1 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 7.7 30 239 17.9 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC MPA Mariposa 3.1 30 11 0.8 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC NSI Nevada 3.1 30 59 4.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC NSI Plumas 3.1 30 19 1.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC NSI Sierra 3.1 30 3 0.2 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 7.7 30 50 3.7 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MC TUO Tuolumne 3.1 30 32 2.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD KER Kern (MD) 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

MD SC Riverside (MD) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

NC MEN Mendocino 3.1 30 54 4.0 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NC NCU Del Norte 3.1 30 17 1.3 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NC NCU Humboldt 3.1 30 68 5.1 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NC NCU Trinity 3.1 30 12 0.9 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

NCC MBU Monterey 3.1 30 117 8.8 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NCC MBU San Benito 3.1 30 16 1.2 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 3.1 30 124 9.3 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NEP LAS Lassen 3.1 30 19 1.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NEP MOD Modoc 3.1 30 6 0.5 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 3.1 30 36 2.7 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Orange 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC Riverside (SC) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SCC SB Santa Barbara 0.0 0 0 0.0 Sierra, 1989 4

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 3.1 30 114 8.5 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SCC VEN Ventura 3.1 30 212 15.9 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SD SD San Diego 0 0 0 0.0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SF BA Alameda 0 0 0 0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Contra Costa 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Marin 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Napa 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Francisco 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA San Mateo 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Santa Clara 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 0 0 0 0.0 BAAQMD, 2006; Figs. 2, 15 1

SJV SJU Fresno 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Kings 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Madera 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Merced 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU San Joaquin 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Stanislaus 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SJV SJU Tulare 0 0 0 0.0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 5

SS IMP Imperial 0.0 0 0 0.0 Sierra, 1989 4

SS SC Riverside (SS) 0 0 0 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 3

SV BUT Butte 7.7 30 395 29.6 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV COL Colusa 7.7 30 31 2.3 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV FR Sutter 7.7 30 138 10.3 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV FR Yuba 7.7 30 102 7.6 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV GLE Glenn 7.7 30 44 3.3 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV PLA Placer (SV) 7.7 30 801 60.1 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV SAC Sacramento 7.7 30 3,885 291.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV SHA Shasta 7.7 30 315 23.6 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV TEH Tehama 7.7 30 104 7.8 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV YS Solano (SV) 7.7 30 384 28.8 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

SV YS Yolo 7.7 30 512 38.4 OMNI, 2003; 5.2 2

609



# 7.1 A

- 19Notes:

P cwl : Percent of people who used their fireplace inserts who used compressed wood logs.

N cwl : Number of compressed wood logs burned in fireplace inserts (logs/home/yr).

H fi,cwl : Number of homes with fireplace inserts that burn compressed wood logs. [H fi,cwl ] = [ H fi,u ]*[P cwl ] , where H fi,u is number of homes with fireplace inserts actually

being used.

W cwl = Weight of an average compressed wood log (tons/log) (assuming 5 lbs/log) = 0.0025 ton/log (OMNI, 2003)

F fi,cwl : Amount of compressed wood logs burned in fireplace inserts, tons/year. [ F fi,cwl ] = [H fi,cwl ]*[N cwl ] *[W cwl ]

Reference:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood

Smoke Season", Figures 2 and 15; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.

2 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento,

San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study",

Section 5.2; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

3 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion Emission

Inve ntory South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year", Table 4.1;

October 24, 2006; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf.

Note: Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties are based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.

4 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency; October 20, 1989. Note: Compressed wood logs were not broken out separately in this report.

5 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010

board hearing. Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Fireplace Inserts.



# 7.1 A

- 20

## Table A

- 9 : Pellet Stove s

– Number of Devices

AB Dis County (AB) H total 

### P

ps 

### P

ps,u 

### H

ps,u 

### Reference Ref.

# of homes

in 2005 % of homes with

wood burning

pellet stoves % of homes that use

their wood burning

pellet stove # of homes

with pellet

stoves in use

GBV GBU Alpine 528 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Inyo 7,808 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

GBV GBU Mono 5,774 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

LC LAK Lake 24,790 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 14,220 0.4 100 57 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

LT PLA Placer (LT) 6,000 0.4 100 24 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

MC AMA Amador 13,961 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

MC CAL Calaveras 18,573 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 51,742 0.4 100 207 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

MC MPA Mariposa 7,276 1.3 100 95 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

MC NSI Nevada 40,157 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

MC NSI Plumas 9,775 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

MC NSI Sierra 1,568 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

MC PLA Placer (MC) 10,799 0.4 100 43 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

MC TUO Tuolumne 22,056 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 96,033 0

- 0 Census, 2004a; Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,9

MD KER Kern (MD) 37,223 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 6,583 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 125,319 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

MD SC Riverside (MD) 3,591 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

NC MEN Mendocino 34,798 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NC NCU Del Norte 9,513 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NC NCU Humboldt 53,152 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NC NCU Trinity 5,739 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 23,511 3.8 40.9 365 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

NCC MBU Monterey 126,559 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NCC MBU San Benito 16,980 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 94,693 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NEP LAS Lassen 10,214 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

NEP MOD Modoc 3,978 0.0

- 0 NCRA, 1988; Tables II, VIII 2

NEP SIS Siskiyou 19,472 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 3,105,059 0

- 0 Census, 2004a; Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 7,9

SC SC Orange 977,547 0

- 0 Census, 2003a, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 5,9

SC SC Riverside (SC) 463,188 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 444,312 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

SCC SB Santa Barbara 143,106 0

- 0 Sierra, 1989 12

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 100,494 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

SCC VEN Ventura 258,483 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

SD SD San Diego 1,056,548 0

- 0 Census, 2004b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 8,9

SF BA Alameda 542,540 8.9 32.2 15,548 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Contra Costa 368,770 5.8 35.7 7,636 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Marin 103,250 4.2 46.6 2,021 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Napa 49,290 4.2 39.1 809 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA San Francisco 338,700 6.4 27.8 6,026 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA San Mateo 261,280 8.9 40.2 9,348 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Santa Clara 595,550 5.8 27.9 9,637 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 101,410 2.9 33.9 997 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 158,970 3.8 40.9 2,471 BAAQMD, 2006; Fig. 2 1

SJV SJU Fresno 261,554 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 181,734 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Kings 35,812 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Madera 38,051 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Merced 67,116 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU San Joaquin 193,423 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Stanislaus 153,742 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SJV SJU Tulare 114,640 0

- 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 11

SS IMP Imperial 43,771 0

- 0 Census, 2007; Table B25040 10

SS SC Riverside (SS) 125,073 0

- 0 Census, 2003b, Table 1

- 4; Census, 2009 6,9

SV BUT Butte 85,478 0.4 100 342 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV COL Colusa 6,617 0.4 100 26 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV FR Sutter 29,776 0.4 100 119 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV FR Yuba 22,021 0.4 100 88 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV GLE Glenn 9,506 0.4 100 38 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV PLA Placer (SV) 103,191 3 63 1,950 SMAQMD, 2007; Fig. 3, Fig. 11 4

SV SAC Sacramento 500,604 3 63 9,461 SMAQMD, 2007; Fig. 3, Fig. 11 4

SV SHA Shasta 68,220 0.4 100 273 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV TEH Tehama 22,410 0.4 100 90 OMNI, 2003; 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2 3

SV YS Solano (SV) 49,415 3 63 934 SMAQMD, 2007; Fig. 3, Fig. 11 4

SV YS Yolo 66,027 3 63 1,248 SMAQMD, 2007; Fig. 3, Fig. 11 4

12,149,062 69,854



# 7.1 A

- 21Notes:



### P

ps 

### : Percent of homes with wood burning pellet stoves.

P

ps,u 

### : Percent of h omes with a p ellet s tove, where the pellet stove was actually used during the burn season

H

ps,u 

### : Number of homes with pellet stoves actually being used. H

ps,u 

### = [H total 

### ]*[P

ps 

### ]*[P

ps,u 

### ]

Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties are based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative method.

References:

1 BAAQMD, 2006. Bay Area Air Quality Management District; “Spare the Air Tonight Study, 2005

- 2006 Winter Wood

Smoke Season", Figures 2 and 15; April 2006; http://sparetheair.org/~/media/STA/Files/3/STA/2005WinterReport.ashx

2 NCRA, 1988. Northern California Research Associates; "Draft Report, The California Residential Wood Consumption

Survey", Tables II and VIII; May 1988. For the NCRA report, "Pellet Stoves" were not listed as a Type of Woodburning Device.

Therefore, i t is assumed that any pellet stoves reported for this survey were included with "Wood Stoves"

3 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento,

San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study",

Sections 2.3d, 6.1, 6.2; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

4 SMAQMD, 2007. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; "Staff Rep ort, Rule 421, Mandatory

Episodic Curtailment of Wood and Other Solid Fuel Burning ", Figures 3 and 11; September 7, 2007;

http://www.airquality.org/notices/Rules2007/Rule421StaffReport27Sep2007

- Final.pdf

5 Census, 2003a. U.S. Census Bureau; "Americ an Housing Survey for the Anaheim

- Santa Ana Metropolitan Area: 2002";

Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Pellet Stoves.

6 Census, 2003b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Riverside

- San Bernardino

- Ontario Metropolitan

Area: 2002"; Table 1

- 4; Issued July 2003; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Pellet Stoves.

7 C ensus, 2004 a . U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles

- Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003";

Table 1

- 4; Issued December 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

Assume "Wood Stoves" include Pellet Stoves.

8 Census, 2004b. U.S. Census Bureau; "American Housing Survey for the San Diego Metropolitan Area: 2002"; Tables 1

- 4, 1

- 6;

Originally Issued July 2003, Update with Errata Issued May 2004; http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/ahs/metropolitandata.html

9 Census, 2009. U.S. Census Bureau; Characteristics of New Housing; "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses

Completed, Number of Fireplaces" (1973

- 2008) and "Characteristics of New One

- Family Houses Sold, Presence of

Fireplace" (1999

- 2008); released July 2009; http://www.census.gov/const/www/charindex_excel.html#singlecomplete

10 U.S. Census, 2007. Unit ed States Census; "American Community Survey 3

- Year Estimates, 2005

- 2007";

Table B25040 (House Heating Fuel); obtained 6/24/09 from website http://factfinder.census.gov

Note: It is assumed that the % of homes that use wood for heating fuel is the same as the % of homes with wood stoves.

It is also assumed that the percentage assigned to wood stoves includes pellet stoves; therefore, pellet stoves on this sheet are zero.

1 1 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010

board hearing. Assume " Wood Stoves" include Pellet Stoves.

12 Sierra, 1989. Sierra Research, Inc.; "Draft Report, Residential Wood Use in California", prepared for the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency; October 20, 1989. Note: Pellet stoves were not broken out separately in this report.



# 7.1 A

- 22

## Table A

- 10 : Pellet Stove s

– Amount of Pellets Burned

AB Dis County (AB) N sacks 

### F

ps 

### Reference Ref.

# of sacks of pellets burned in

pellet stoves (sacks/home/yr) Pellets burned in p ellet

s toves, tons/year

GBV GBU Alpine 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

GBV GBU Inyo 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

GBV GBU Mono 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

LC LAK Lake 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 100.0 114 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

LT PLA Placer (LT) 100.0 48 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC AMA Amador 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC CAL Calaveras 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 100.0 414 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC MPA Mariposa 100.0 189 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC NSI Nevada 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC NSI Plumas 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC NSI Sierra 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC PLA Placer (MC) 100.0 86 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MC TUO Tuolumne 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

MD KER Kern (MD) 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

MD SC Riverside (MD) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

NC MEN Mendocino 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NC NCU Del Norte 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NC NCU Humboldt 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NC NCU Trinity 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 100.0 731 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NCC MBU Monterey 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NCC MBU San Benito 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NEP LAS Lassen 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NEP MOD Modoc 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

NEP SIS Siskiyou 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SC SC Orange 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SC SC Riverside (SC) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SCC SB Santa Barbara 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SCC VEN Ventura 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SD SD San Diego 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SF BA Alameda 100.0 31,096 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Contra Costa 100.0 15,272 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Marin 100.0 4,042 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Napa 100.0 1,619 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA San Francisco 100.0 12,052 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA San Mateo 100.0 18,696 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Santa Clara 100.0 19,274 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Solano (SF) 100.0 1,994 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 100.0 4,941 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SJV SJU Fresno 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Kings 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Madera 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Merced 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU San Joaquin 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Stanislaus 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SJV SJU Tulare 0 SJVUAPCD, 2010; QH, QI 3

SS IMP Imperial 100.0 0 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SS SC Riverside (SS) 0 OMNI, 2006; 3.17, 4.1 2

SV BUT Butte 100.0 684 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV COL Colusa 100.0 53 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV FR Sutter 100.0 238 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV FR Yuba 100.0 176 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV GLE Glenn 100.0 76 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV PLA Placer (SV) 100.0 3,901 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV SAC Sacramento 100.0 18,923 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV SHA Shasta 100.0 546 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV TEH Tehama 100.0 179 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV YS Solano (SV) 100.0 1,868 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

SV YS Yolo 100.0 2,496 OMNI, 2003; 6.7 1

139,708



# 7.1 A

- 23

### Notes:

N sacks 

### : Number of sacks of pellets burned in pellet stoves (sacks/home/yr).

W sack 

### = Weight of an Average Sack of Pellets (tons/sack) (assuming 40 lbs/sack) = 0.02 tons/sack (HPBA, 2009)

F

ps 

### : Amount of pellet sacks burned in pellet stoves, tons/year. [ F

ps 

### ] = [ H

ps,u 

### ]*[ N sacks 

### ]*[ W sack 

### ] , where H

ps,u 

### is n umber of homes with pellet stoves

actually being used.

Based on survey data, it is assumed that 100% of people who used their pellet stoves burned pellets.

Reference s :

1 OMNI, 2003. D. Broderick and J. Houck; OMNI Consulting Services, Inc.; "Results of Wood Burning Survey

- Sacramento,

San Joaquin, and San Francisco Areas, University of California Berkeley/California Air Resources Board

- GIS Study",

Section 6.7; Jan. 15, 2003; http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/final.pdf

2 OMNI, 2006. J.E. Houck and B.N. Eagle; OMNI Environmental Services, Inc.; "Residential Wood Combustion Emission

Inventory South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley Portion of Salton Sea Air Basin, 2002 Base Year",

Tables 3.23, 3.24 and 4.8; October 24, 2006;

http://www.omni

- test.com/publications/SCAQMD

- RWC4.pdf

Note: Estimates for San Diego and South Coast counties are based on U.S. Census American Housing Survey and alternative me thod.

Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Pellet Stoves.

3 SJVUAPCD, 2010. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; "District's Comprehensive Public Outreach and

Education Program"; summary of survey conducted by CC&G (Feb.

- May 2010); presented at the September 29

- 30, 2010

board hearing. Assume cord wood usage for "Wood Stoves" includes all fuel usage for Pellet Stoves.

4 HPBA, 2009. Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association (HPBA), Fuel Options (1/22/09). Pellets come in 40

- pound bags.

http://www.hpba.org/index.php?id=69



# 7.1 A

- 24

## Table A

- 11: Fireplaces

– 2005 Fuel Use and Emissions Estimates

AB Dis County (Air Basin) FUEL USE (Tons/Yr) 2005 EMISSIONS (Tons/Year)

Cord

Wood Mfrd.

Logs Total All

Fuels CO NO X PM 2.5 PM 10 SO 2 ROG NH 3

GBV GBU Alpine 161 7 168 12 0 2 2 0 2 0

GBV GBU Inyo 1,719 73 1,792 133 2 21 22 0 17 2

GBV GBU Mono 1,858 79 1,937 144 3 23 24 1 19 2

LC LAK Lake 4,053 172 4,226 314 6 50 52 1 41 4

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 1,921 77 1,998 148 3 24 25 1 19 2

LT PLA Placer (LT) 811 33 843 63 1 10 10 0 8 1

MC AMA Amador 3,259 138 3,398 252 5 40 42 1 33 3

MC CAL Calaveras 3,037 129 3,166 235 4 37 39 1 31 3

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 6,990 281 7,271 540 10 86 89 2 71 6

MC MPA Mariposa 1,190 51 1,240 92 2 15 15 0 12 1

MC NSI Nevada 6,566 279 6,845 508 9 81 84 2 67 6

MC NSI Plumas 2,896 123 3,019 224 4 36 37 1 29 3

MC NSI Sierra 422 18 440 33 1 5 5 0 4 0

MC PLA Placer (MC) 1,459 59 1,518 113 2 18 19 0 15 1

MC TUO Tuolumne 3,606 153 3,760 279 5 45 46 1 37 3

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 367 374 741 53 2 13 13 1 10 0

MD KER Kern (MD) 2,351 86 2,437 181 3 29 30 1 24 2

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 39 34 72 5 0 1 1 0 1 0

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 819 708 1,527 110 3 26 27 2 20 1

MD SC Riverside (MD) 23 20 43 3 0 1 1 0 1 0

NC MEN Mendocino 8,223 349 8,573 637 12 102 105 2 84 7

NC NCU Del Norte 2,549 108 2,657 197 4 31 33 1 26 2

NC NCU Humboldt 10,404 442 10,846 805 15 128 133 3 106 9

NC NCU Trinity 1,886 80 1,966 146 3 23 24 1 19 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 4,720 141 4,861 361 7 57 59 1 47 4

NCC MBU Monterey 17,909 760 18,669 1,386 26 221 230 5 182 16

NCC MBU San Benito 2,513 107 2,619 194 4 31 32 1 26 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 18,841 800 19,641 1,458 27 233 242 5 192 17

NEP LAS Lassen 2,876 122 2,998 223 4 36 37 1 29 3

NEP MOD Modoc 980 42 1,022 76 1 12 13 0 10 1

NEP SIS Siskiyou 5,504 234 5,737 426 8 68 71 2 56 5

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 12,031 12,045 24,076 1,721 55 416 432 28 317 11

SC SC Orange 5,907 6,024 11,931 853 27 207 215 14 158 5

SC SC Riverside (SC) 2,965 2,564 5,530 397 12 93 97 6 71 3

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 2,855 2,469 5,325 382 12 90 93 6 69 3

SCC SB Santa Barbara 10,276 1,066 11,342 839 17 141 147 4 115 9

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 17,360 737 18,098 1,344 25 214 223 5 177 16

SCC VEN Ventura 32,306 1,372 33,678 2,501 46 399 414 9 328 29

SD SD San Diego 5,683 5,189 10,872 779 24 185 192 12 141 5

SF BA Alameda 49,507 2,477 51,983 3,858 72 620 644 15 510 45

SF BA Contra Costa 94,221 2,316 96,536 7,178 130 1,124 1,168 24 930 85

SF BA Marin 8,479 806 9,285 687 14 115 119 3 94 8

SF BA Napa 8,995 310 9,305 691 13 109 114 2 90 8

SF BA San Francisco 6,181 1,112 7,294 537 12 96 100 4 77 6

SF BA San Mateo 16,689 1,897 18,586 1,373 28 234 243 7 190 15

SF BA Santa Clara 70,647 2,643 73,290 5,444 100 864 897 20 712 64

SF BA Solano (SF) 19,433 564 19,997 1,486 27 234 243 5 193 17

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 31,913 952 32,866 2,443 45 385 400 8 318 29

SJV SJU Fresno 49,461 715 50,176 3,734 67 578 601 11 479 45

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 29,189 422 29,611 2,204 39 341 355 7 283 26

SJV SJU Kings 5,752 83 5,835 434 8 67 70 1 56 5

SJV SJU Madera 7,325 106 7,430 553 10 86 89 2 71 7

SJV SJU Merced 12,920 187 13,106 975 17 151 157 3 125 12

SJV SJU San Joaquin 69,428 1,003 70,431 5,241 94 812 843 16 673 62

SJV SJU Stanislaus 41,253 596 41,849 3,114 56 482 501 10 400 37

SJV SJU Tulare 29,252 423 29,675 2,208 39 342 355 7 284 26

SS IMP Imperial 876 59 935 69 1 11 12 0 9 1

SS SC Riverside (SS) 807 698 1,506 108 3 25 26 2 19 1

SV BUT Butte 11,548 464 12,012 892 17 142 147 3 117 10

SV COL Colusa 894 36 930 69 1 11 11 0 9 1

SV FR Sutter 4,023 162 4,184 311 6 49 51 1 41 4

SV FR Yuba 2,975 120 3,094 230 4 37 38 1 30 3

SV GLE Glenn 1,284 52 1,336 99 2 16 16 0 13 1

SV PLA Placer (SV) 6,854 658 7,513 556 11 93 97 3 76 6

SV SAC Sacramento 33,252 3,194 36,446 2,696 54 452 469 13 368 30

SV SHA Shasta 9,216 370 9,586 712 13 113 118 3 93 8

SV TEH Tehama 3,027 122 3,149 234 4 37 39 1 31 3

SV YS Solano (SV) 3,282 315 3,598 266 5 45 46 1 36 3

SV YS Yolo 4,386 421 4,807 356 7 60 62 2 49 4

Totals (tons/year) = 842,407 60,825 903,233 66,926 1,293 10,981 11,406 296 8,989 758

Totals (Annual Avg. tons/day) = 2,308 167 2,475 183 4 30 31 1 25 2



# 7.1 A

- 25

### Fireplace Emission Factors (lb/ton fuel burned)

CO NOX PM2.5 PM10 SO2 ROG NH3

Cord Wood / Bundles 149 2.6 22.7 23.6 0.4 18.9 1.8

Mfrd. Log 137 6.5 46.4 48.2 4.2 33.8 0.004

[Emissions, tons/yr] = [Emission Factor, lb/ton]*[Fuel Use, tons/yr]/[2000 lbs/ton]

[Total PM] = [PM10]/[0.935], per ARB particulate matter profile code #424

[PM2.5] = [Total PM]*[0.9001] = [PM10]*[0.9001/0.935] = [PM10]*[0.963], per ARB particulate matter profile code #424

[Total Organic Gases, TOG] = [ROG]/0.4385, per ARB organic profile code #549



# 7.1 A

- 26

## Table A

- 12 : All Wood Stoves

– 2005 Fuel Use and Emissions Estimates

(includes Wood Stoves, Fireplace Inserts, Pellet Stoves)

AB Dis County (Air Basin) FUEL USE (Tons/Yr) 2005 EMISSIONS (Tons/Year)

Cord Wood:

Conventional Cord Wood: Phase II,

Non

- Catalytic Cord Wood: Phase II,

Catalytic Compressed Wood

Logs Pellets Total for All

Fuels CO NO X PM 2.5 PM 10 SO 2 ROG NH 3

GBV GBU Alpine 115 72 26 0 0 212 20 0 2 3 0 4 0

GBV GBU Inyo 1,225 767 276 1 0 2,268 210 3 26 27 0 39 2

GBV GBU Mono 1,324 830 298 1 0 2,452 227 3 28 29 0 42 2

LC LAK Lake 5,148 3,251 1,134 3 0 9,535 882 12 110 114 2 164 6

LT ED El Dorado (LT) 3,732 2,148 722 5 114 6,721 621 9 77 80 1 117 4

LT PLA Placer (LT) 1,575 906 305 2 48 2,836 262 4 33 34 1 49 2

MC AMA Amador 4,270 2,717 921 2 0 7,910 732 10 91 95 2 136 5

MC CAL Calaveras 6,660 4,250 1,423 2 0 12,335 1,142 16 142 147 2 213 8

MC ED El Dorado (MC) 13,579 7,818 2,628 18 414 24,456 2,260 31 282 292 5 427 16

MC MPA Mariposa 1,534 969 338 1 189 3,030 264 4 33 34 1 49 2

MC NSI Nevada 9,992 6,336 2,176 4 0 18,507 1,713 23 213 221 4 319 12

MC NSI Plumas 4,129 2,631 887 1 0 7,648 708 10 88 91 2 132 5

MC NSI Sierra 301 189 68 0 0 557 52 1 6 7 0 10 0

MC PLA Placer (MC) 2,834 1,632 548 4 86 5,104 472 7 59 61 1 89 3

MC TUO Tuolumne 8,322 5,315 1,774 2 0 15,413 1,427 19 177 184 3 266 10

MD AV Los Angeles (MD) 998 178 88 0 0 1,264 132 2 17 17 0 28 1

MD KER Kern (MD) 863 428 41 0 0 1,332 132 2 16 17 0 26 1

MD MOJ Riverside (MD) 199 35 17 0 0 251 26 0 3 3 0 6 0

MD MOJ San Bernardino (MD) 4,488 799 394 0 0 5,682 595 8 76 79 1 127 4

MD SC Riverside (MD) 119 21 10 0 0 151 16 0 2 2 0 3 0

NC MEN Mendocino 11,927 7,601 2,560 4 0 22,092 2,046 28 254 264 4 381 15

NC NCU Del Norte 2,587 1,638 567 1 0 4,793 444 6 55 57 1 83 3

NC NCU Humboldt 14,467 8,960 2,204 5 0 25,635 2,416 33 298 309 5 454 17

NC NCU Trinity 1,343 842 302 1 0 2,489 230 3 29 30 0 43 2

NC NS Sonoma (NC) 2,600 3,089 1,262 0 731 7,682 589 10 73 76 2 97 4

NCC MBU Monterey 9,158 5,666 2,136 9 0 16,969 1,568 21 196 203 3 293 11

NCC MBU San Benito 1,722 1,078 389 1 0 3,190 295 4 37 38 1 55 2

NCC MBU Santa Cruz 12,567 7,858 2,847 9 0 23,281 2,153 29 268 279 5 402 16

NEP LAS Lassen 4,087 2,603 878 1 0 7,569 701 10 87 91 2 131 5

NEP MOD Modoc 698 438 157 0 0 1,293 120 2 15 15 0 22 1

NEP SIS Siskiyou 7,504 4,777 1,615 3 0 13,900 1,287 18 160 166 3 240 9

SC SC Los Angeles (SC) 32,280 5,749 2,832 0 0 40,860 4,278 55 544 565 8 911 31

SC SC Orange 6,015 1,071 528 0 0 7,614 797 10 101 105 2 170 6

SC SC Riverside (SC) 15,173 2,702 1,331 0 0 19,207 2,011 26 256 265 4 428 15

SC SC San Bernardino (SC) 15,650 2,787 1,373 0 0 19,810 2,074 26 264 274 4 442 15

SCC SB Santa Barbara 8,830 5,637 1,885 0 0 16,352 1,514 21 188 195 3 282 11

SCC SLO San Luis Obispo 9,552 5,928 2,208 9 0 17,697 1,636 22 204 212 4 305 12

SCC VEN Ventura 9,590 5,733 2,436 16 0 17,775 1,639 22 206 214 4 307 12

SD SD San Diego 31,486 5,608 2,762 0 0 39,856 4,173 53 530 551 8 889 31

SF BA Alameda 370 440 180 0 31,096 32,086 330 60 56 58 5 14 5

SF BA Contra Costa 10,823 12,862 5,254 0 15,272 44,211 2,550 64 324 336 8 404 20

SF BA Marin 13,531 16,080 6,568 0 4,042 40,220 3,068 52 383 398 8 504 22

SF BA Napa 4,643 5,517 2,254 0 1,619 14,033 1,055 18 132 137 3 173 8

SF BA San Francisco 347 412 168 0 12,052 12,979 174 24 27 28 2 13 2

SF BA San Mateo 4,458 5,298 2,164 0 18,696 30,617 1,149 50 152 158 5 167 10

SF BA Santa Clara 7,927 9,420 3,848 0 19,274 40,469 1,932 62 249 259 7 296 16



# 7.1 A

- 27

## Table A

- 12 : All Wood Stoves

– 2005 Fuel Use and Emissions Estimates

(includes Wood Stoves, Fireplace Inserts, Pellet Stoves)

AB Dis County (Air Basin) FUEL USE (Tons/Yr) 2005 EMISSIONS (Tons/Year)

Cord Wood:

Conventional Cord Wood: Phase II,

Non

- Catalytic Cord Wood: Phase II,

Catalytic Compressed Wood

Logs Pellets Total for All

Fuels CO NO X PM 2.5 PM 10 SO 2 ROG NH 3

SF BA Solano (SF) 692 823 336 0 1,994 3,845 171 6 22 23 1 26 1

SF BA Sonoma (SF) 17,578 20,889 8,532 0 4,941 51,941 3,984 66 497 516 10 655 29

SJV SJU Fresno 9,274 4,599 438 0 0 14,311 1,417 19 173 180 3 277 10

SJV SJU Kern (SJV) 4,214 2,090 199 0 0 6,503 644 8 79 82 1 126 5

SJV SJU Kings 614 304 29 0 0 947 94 1 11 12 0 18 1

SJV SJU Madera 3,835 1,902 181 0 0 5,919 586 8 72 74 1 114 4

SJV SJU Merced 6,921 3,432 327 0 0 10,680 1,057 14 129 134 2 206 8

SJV SJU San Joaquin 4,351 2,158 206 0 0 6,714 665 9 81 84 1 130 5

SJV SJU Stanislaus 8,180 4,057 387 0 0 12,624 1,250 16 153 159 3 244 9

SJV SJU Tulare 17,215 8,538 814 0 0 26,567 2,630 35 322 334 5 514 19

SS IMP Imperial 91 16 8 0 0 115 12 0 2 2 0 3 0

SS SC Riverside (SS) 4,091 729 359 0 0 5,179 542 7 69 72 1 115 4

SV BUT Butte 22,433 12,915 4,341 30 684 40,402 3,733 52 465 483 8 705 27

SV COL Colusa 1,737 1,000 336 2 53 3,128 289 4 36 37 1 55 2

SV FR Sutter 7,814 4,499 1,512 10 238 14,074 1,300 18 162 168 3 245 9

SV FR Yuba 5,779 3,327 1,118 8 176 10,408 962 13 120 124 2 182 7

SV GLE Glenn 2,495 1,436 483 3 76 4,493 415 6 52 54 1 78 3

SV PLA Placer (SV) 14,852 7,005 4,874 60 3,901 30,692 2,499 41 322 335 6 473 19

SV SAC Sacramento 72,052 33,982 23,644 291 18,923 148,892 12,121 200 1,564 1,624 29 2,293 90

SV SHA Shasta 17,904 10,307 3,464 24 546 32,245 2,979 41 371 386 6 562 22

SV TEH Tehama 5,881 3,386 1,138 8 179 10,592 979 14 122 127 2 185 7

SV YS Solano (SV) 7,112 3,354 2,334 29 1,868 14,697 1,196 20 154 160 3 226 9

SV YS Yolo 9,503 4,482 3,119 38 2,496 19,638 1,599 26 206 214 4 302 12

Totals (tons/year) = 555,358 306,317 122,958 609 139,708 1,124,949 93,243 1,516 11,753 12,209 219 17,484 687

Totals (Ann. Avg. tons/day) = 255 4 32 33 1 48 2



### Wood Stove Emission Factors (lb/ton fuel burned)

Wood Stoves & Fireplace Inserts: Fuel Type CO NOX PM2.5 PM10 SO2 ROG NH3

Conventional (non

- EPA certified) Cord Wood 230.8 2.8 29.5 30.6 0.4 53 1.7

Phase II EPA certified, Non

- Catalytic Cord Wood 140.8 2.28 14.1 14.6 0.4 12 0.9

Phase II EPA certified, Catalytic Cord Wood 104.4 2 19.6 20.4 0.4 15 0.9

All Compressed Wood Logs 201.2 2.8 25.0 26 0.4 15.1 1.7

Pellet Stoves Pellets 15.9 3.8 2.9 3.06 0.32 0.04 0.3



### [Emissions, tons/yr] = [Emission Factor, lb/ton]*[Fuel Use, tons/yr]/[2000 lbs/ton]

[Total PM] = [PM10]/[ 0.935], per ARB particulate matter profile code #424

[PM2.5] = [Total PM]*[0.9001] = [PM10]*[0.9001/0.935] = [PM10]*[0.963], per ARB particulate matter profile code #424

[Total Organic Gases, TOG] = [ROG]/0.4385, per ARB organic profile code #549



# 7.1 A

- 28