alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19684-19685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAD01000 L12200000.AL 0000]


Meeting of the California Desert District Advisory Council

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Laws 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council (DAC) 
to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the 
Interior, will meet in formal session on Saturday, April 21, 2012, from 
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. in Ridgecrest, Calif. at a location to be noticed 
at least 15 days prior to the meeting. There also will be a field trip 
on Friday, April 20, from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on BLM-administered 
lands. Field trip details will be posted on the DAC web page, http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/rac/dac.html, when finalized.
    Agenda topics for the Saturday meeting will include updates by 
council members, the BLM California Desert District manager, five field 
office managers, and council subgroups. Final agenda items will be 
posted on the DAC web page listed above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All DAC meetings are open to the public. 
Public comment for items not on the agenda will be scheduled at the 
beginning of the meeting Saturday morning. Time for public comment may 
be made available by the council chairman during the presentation of 
various agenda items, and is scheduled at the end of the meeting for 
topics not on the agenda.
    While the Saturday meeting is tentatively scheduled from 8 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., the meeting could conclude prior to 4:30 p.m. should the 
council conclude its presentations and discussions. Therefore, members 
of the

[[Page 19685]]

public interested in a particular agenda item or discussion should 
schedule their arrival accordingly.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, External Affairs, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno 
Valley, CA 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the time of the 
meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will be 
incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Briery, BLM California Desert 
District External Affairs, (951) 697-5220.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Raymond Lee,
Acting Associate District Manager, California Desert District.
[FR Doc. 2012-7785 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 225

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that, as a symbol

of solidarity following the terrorist attacks on the United

States on September 11, 2001, every United States citizen is encouraged to display the flag of the United

States.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked and destroyed four commercial aircraft, crashing two of them

into the World Trade Center in New York City, and

crashing another aircraft into the Pentagon outside

Washington, D.C.; and

Whereas thousands of innocent people were killed and injured

as a result of those attacks, including the passengers and
2

HCON 225 RDS

crew of the four aircraft, workers and visitors in the World

Trade Center and the Pentagon, rescue workers, and bystanders: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) in response to the terrorist attacks on the

4 United States on September 11, 2001, United

5 States citizens should join together to defend and

6 honor the Nation and its symbols of strength; and

7 (2) for a period of 30 days after the date on

8 which this resolution is agreed to, each United

9 States citizen and every community in the Nation is

10 encouraged to display the flag of the United States

11 at homes, places of work and business, public build12 ings, and places of worship to remember those indi13 viduals who have been lost and to show the soli14 darity, resolve, and strength of the Nation.

Passed the House of Representatives September 13,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 130 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing printing of the book entitled ``Asian and Pacific Islander 
                        Americans in Congress''.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICANS IN CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The book entitled ``Asian and Pacific Islander 
Americans in Congress'', prepared by the Library of Congress under the 
direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a 
House document.
    (b) Specifications.--The House document described in subsection (a) 
shall include illustrations and shall be in the style, form, manner, 
and binding as directed by the Joint Committee on Printing.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

    In addition to the usual number of copies, there shall be printed 
the lesser of--
            (1) 30,700 copies of the document described in subsection 
        (a) of section 1, of which--
                    (A) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on 
                House Administration of the House of Representatives; 
                and
                    (B) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on 
                Rules and Administration of the Senate; or
            (2) such number of copies of the document described in 
        subsection (a) of section 1 as does not exceed a total 
        production and printing cost of $220,000, which copies shall be 
        for the use of the Committee on House Administration of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration of the Senate in the same proportions as 
        described in paragraph (1).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 9, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURFITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger 
and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a 
commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, 2321 Burnett Blvd., Wilmington, NC 28401, has 
been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum 
products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in 
accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. 
Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and 
gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the 
entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9dfeffedb3f1fcfff5ecddf9f5eeb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b58594b15575a59534a7b5f5348155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labls_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial 
gauger and laboratory became effective on August 10, 2011. The next 
triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 23014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Cassata, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-
1060.

    Dated: January 4, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-789 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### In re the Marriage of: Richard E. LORD, Petitioner, v. Florence H. LORD, Respondent.

No. 81 SC 4.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

March 26, 1982.

Valjean H. McCurdy, Arvada, for petitioner.

Frederick Epstein, Denver, for respondent.

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the Stipulation of Settlement filed herein, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

It Is This Day Ordered that said Stipulation shall be, and the same hereby is, Approved, and this appeal is Dismissed, 626 P.2d 698, and the matter Remanded to the Court of Appeals for any further proceedings.
[No. 36389-1-I.

Division One.

August 12, 1996.]

#### Constance Johnson, *Individually and as Personal Representative, Appellants,*v. Northwest Sports Divers, Inc., et al., *Defendants,*Lighthouse Diving Center, Inc., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 91-2-04214-2, James H. Allendoerfer, J., entered July 22, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EVARISTO GOMEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72973

Agency No. A073-967-311

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Evaristo Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to remand and

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order pretermitting his

application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JUL 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s continuous physical

presence determination, Ibarra-Flores v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 614, 618 (9th Cir.

2006), and review de novo constitutional claims, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889,

894 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Gomez failed

to establish the ten years of continuous physical presence required for cancellation

of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(A); Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales, 485 F.3d

509, 511-12 (9th Cir. 2007) (expedited removal interrupts an alien’s continuous

physical presence for cancellation purposes).

The admission of evidence pertaining to Gomez’s 1999 expedited removal

order was not fundamentally unfair such that it violated his due process rights. See

Sanchez v. Holder, 704 F.3d 1107, 1109 (9th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, Gomez’s

claim that the BIA violated due process in affirming the IJ’s decision also fails. 

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a petitioner to

prevail on a due process claim).

To the extent that Gomez seeks to challenge his 1999 expedited removal

order, we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)(i),

(e)(2); Avendano-Ramirez v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 813, 818-19 (9th Cir. 2004). 

2 13-72973
Gomez has not raised, and has therefore waived, any challenge to the BIA’s

denial of his motion to remand. See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072,

1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (a petitioner waives a contention by failing to raise it in

the opening brief).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part.

3 13-72973
# Službeni list C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 145 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.30. travnja 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 145

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.30. travnja 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Vijeće Europske unije |
| 2020/C 145/01 | Odluka Vijeća od 28. travnja 2020. o imenovanju članova Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Vijeće Europske unije

2020/C 145/01

Odluka Vijeća od 28. travnja 2020. o imenovanju članova Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Vijeće Europske unije

| 30.4.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 145/1

---

ODLUKA VIJEĆA

od 28. travnja 2020.

o imenovanju članova Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora

(2020/C 145/01)

VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o osnivanju Europske zajednice za atomsku energiju, a posebno njegov članak 134. stavak 2.,

nakon savjetovanja s Europskom komisijom,

budući da:

| (1) | Vijeće je Odlukom od 6. studenoga 2018. (1) imenovalo članove Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora („Odbor”) za razdoblje od 6. studenoga 2018. do 6. studenoga 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Vijeće je Odlukom od 6. studenoga 2018. (1) imenovalo članove Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora („Odbor”) za razdoblje od 6. studenoga 2018. do 6. studenoga 2023.

| (2) | Nakon što je g. Eugenijus UŠPURAS preminuo mjesto člana Odbora postalo je slobodno. Stoga bi trebalo imenovati novoga člana za preostalo vrijeme mandata g. Eugenijusa UŠPURASA. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Nakon što je g. Eugenijus UŠPURAS preminuo mjesto člana Odbora postalo je slobodno. Stoga bi trebalo imenovati novoga člana za preostalo vrijeme mandata g. Eugenijusa UŠPURASA.

| (3) | Nakon ostavke g. Grzegorza WROCHNE mjesto člana Odbora postalo je slobodno. Stoga bi trebalo imenovati novoga člana za preostalo vrijeme mandata g. Grzegorza WROCHNE, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Nakon ostavke g. Grzegorza WROCHNE mjesto člana Odbora postalo je slobodno. Stoga bi trebalo imenovati novoga člana za preostalo vrijeme mandata g. Grzegorza WROCHNE,

DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:

Članak 1.

G. Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS i g. Józef SOBOLEWSKI imenuju se članovima Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora do 6. studenoga 2023.

Članak 2.

Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja.

Sastavljeno u Bruxellesu 28. travnja 2020.

Za Vijeće

Predsjednik

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Odluka Vijeća od 6. studenoga 2018. o imenovanju članstva Znanstvenog i tehničkog odbora (SL C 403, 9.11.2018., str. 2.).

1

---
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (4.94 MB)
 
 JBSA Change of Command AETC Air Education and Training Command Joint Base San Antonio Webb First Command Kwast AETCChangeofCommand
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
steam_record - Re: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Marks, Jeffrey Allen" <jmarks@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Marks, Jeffrey Allen" <jmarks@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/25/2010 04:55PM 

Subject: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Marks, Jeffrey Allen" <jmarks@rrienergy.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:54 PM

Subject: Re: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C5C5D... 3/17/2011
Alicea,

Please find attached RRI Energy – Titus generating facility correspondence for EPA’s 

consideration to extend the deadline to complete and comply for Effluent ICR requirements.

If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Jeffrey A. Marks

Titus – General Manager, (610) 378-8402

[attachment "RRI - Titus ICR Extension Request Letter.pdf" removed by Jezebele 

Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C5C5D... 3/17/2011
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry MedicalInc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:

 

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterand six months ended June 28, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporationfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation.

 

August 7, 2008

 
|   | /s/ Brian S. Moore      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Brian S. Moore          |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Fred L. Hite        |
|   | Fred L. Hite            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Jerry LOKEY v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS and Diversified Contracts, Inc.

Civ. 6177.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 20, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 25, 1988.

Jerry Lokey, pro se.

George Cocoris, Gen. Counsel, and Glenn Chaffin, Asst. Gen. Counsel, State of Ala. Dept, of Industrial Relations, Montgomery, for appellees.

EDWARD N. SCRUGGS, Retired Circuit Judge.

The employee appealed from a final judgment of the circuit court which denied his unemployment compensation claim after an *ore tenus*trial.

The court reporter’s transcript consists of only the testimony of two employer witnesses. The evidence of the employee and of his brother is not before us; however, facts therefrom and argument thereon are included and made in the employee’s brief. An appellant cannot argue or state facts in brief which are not supported by the record, and “when all the evidence before the trial court is not before this Court, it is presumed that the missing evidence is sufficient to support the judgment and the judgment not be disturbed.” *Seidler v. Phillips,*496 So.2d 714, 716 (Ala.1986) (citations omitted).

Additionally, the employee did not cite any authority in his appellate briefs to support his argument. Such citations are required. Rule 28(a)(1) and (5), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure. We may affirm where no authority is cited by an appellant, for it is neither our duty nor our function to perform an appellant’s legal research. *Henderson v. Alabama A & M University,*483 So.2d 392 (Ala.1986); *Guyton v. Guyton,*469 So.2d 640 (Ala.Civ.App.1985).

The final judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by Retired Circuit Judge EDWARD N. SCRUGGS while serving on active duty status as a judge of this court under the provisions of § 12-18-10(e) of the Code of Alabama of 1975 and this opinion is hereby adopted as that of the court.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.