In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-1001V

Filed: December 16, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

DINNIA STEHLE, *

*

Petitioner, * Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

* Influenza;

* Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Maximillian Muller, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Douglas Ross, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On September 10, 2015, Petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 [the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury 

following receipt of her October 15, 2014 influenza vaccination. Petition at 1. The 

case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On November 19, 2015, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner 

entitled to compensation for a shoulder injury (“SIRVA”). On December 16, 2015, 

respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation [“Proffer”] indicating petitioner 

should be awarded $70,000.00. Proffer at 1. In the Proffer, respondent represented that 

petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards

petitioner a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner, Dinnia Stehle. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master

 3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice 

renouncing the right to seek review.
 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

*

DINNIA STEHLE, *

*

Petitioner, *

*

v. * No. 15-1001V (ECF)

* CHIEF SPECIAL MASTER

* NORA BETH DORSEY

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On November 19, 2015, the Chief Special Master found that a preponderance of the 

medical evidence indicates that petitioner suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”), which was causally related to the flu vaccination she received on 

October 15, 2014. The parties proceeded thereafter to address the amount of compensation to be 

awarded in this case. 

I. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded 

a total lump sum of $70,000.00, which amount represents all elements of compensation to which 

petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).1 Petitioner agrees. 

 

1

Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future 

medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the 

right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
2

II. Form of the Award

The parties recommend that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made 

through a lump sum payment of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. 

Petitioner agrees. 

Respectfully submitted, 

BENJAMIN C. MIZER

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General

RUPA BHATTACHARYYA

Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

VINCENT J. MATANOSKI

Deputy Director

Torts Branch, Civil Division

GLENN A. MACLEOD

Senior Trial Counsel

Torts Branch, Civil Division

/s/ DOUGLAS ROSS

DOUGLAS ROSS

Trial Attorney

Torts Branch, Civil Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044-0146

Tel.: (202) 616-3667

DATE: December 16, 2015