alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 12929-002 and 14079-000]

                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Mississippi River, near the town of Helena, in Phillips County Arkansas, and Tunica and Coahoma counties, Mississippi. The applications were filed by FFP Project 40, LLC for Project No. 12929-002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14079-000.                

                    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by                           ( print page 2288)                        this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-700 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 16, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

135553 (11) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

WILLIAM TODD LAPLANTE, #249181, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 135553 

 CoA: 281776 

JAMES E. SODERBERG, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $48.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$327.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order. 

jm 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 16, 2008 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Liu Zhong Yi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Liu Zhong Yi Liu Zhong Yi, CEO and President, Principal Executive Officer  August 14, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">New Horizon Surgical Center, L.L.C., as Assignee of Kelvyn Aguilar, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Travelers Insurance, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Alla Peker of counsel), for appellant.Law Office of Stephen A. Strauss, P.C. (Colleen M. Terry of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Richmond County (Orlando Marrazzo, Jr., J.), entered September 22, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branch of defendant's motion which had sought summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.</p><p>In support of its motion, defendant established that it had timely mailed initial and follow-up verification requests (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co.</i>, 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]). Defendant also demonstrated, prima facie, that it had not received all of the requested verification and, thus, that plaintiff's action is premature (<i>see Central Suffolk Hosp. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.</i>, 24 AD3d 492 [2005]). In opposition to the motion, plaintiff submitted an affidavit which stated that all of the verification requested by defendant was provided to defendant and that a copy of the verification provided was annexed. Among the documents annexed was a medical report in which the treating provider stated that plaintiff's assignor had signed a "separate, comprehensive Informed Consent Form which has been made a portion of the patient's chart." Defendant's verification request included a request for a signed informed consent form executed by plaintiff's assignor. However, no such document was annexed to plaintiff's papers as having been provided to defendant. Thus, plaintiff failed to raise <font color="FF0000">[*2]</font>an issue of fact as to whether it had provided all of the requested verification.</p><p>Accordingly, the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the branch of defendant's motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: March 08, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### L & M DEMOLITION, INC. and Levi Slaughter Asphalt Co., et al. v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS and Paul C. Mitchell, Jr., et al.

No. 87-CC-2443.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re L & M Demolition, Inc.; Levi Slaughter Asphalt Co.; appljdng for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus, supervisory and remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 87-14461; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-8815.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1996 AND THE BALANCE SHEET AT APRIL 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000849433
<NAME> ANSOFT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                          10,728
<SECURITIES>                                       119
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,666
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,031
<PP&E>                                             724
<DEPRECIATION>                                     197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,391
<SALES>                                          7,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,695
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    688
<INCOME-TAX>                                       612
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19 
        

</TABLE>
#### Joseph C. NELSON, Pearline Nelson and Mary Lee Wiggins Nelson v. Mary RONQUILLO, the Travelers Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., and Board of Trustees of State Colleges and Universities (Southeastern Louisiana University).

No. 88-C-0153.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Nelson, Joseph C.; Nelson, Pear-line; Nelson, Mary Lee Wiggins; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1595; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 74305.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 454.

*137Granted. Summary judgment reversed and case remanded to. district court for trial.
[No. 14227-2-III.

Division Three.

June 6, 1996.]

#### A. G. Edwards, Inc., et al. , *Respondents,*v. Northwest Pipeline Corporation, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Benton County, No. 93-2-00474-2, Carolyn A. Brown, J., entered July 7, 1994. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Thompson, J., concurred in by Schultheis, A.C.J., and Munson, J.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00648-CV

Daniel GARZA and Lynn Garza,

Appellants

v.

Jesse FLORES III,

Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-01-47730CV

Honorable Richard C.Terrell, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 9, 2009

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

 On October 26, 2009, the trial court clerk filed a notification of late record, stating that the

appellants had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record.We,

therefore, ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of the

order that either (1) the clerk’s fee had been paid or arrangements had been made to pay the clerk’s

fee; or (2) appellant was entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. We warned that if
04-09-00648-CV

-2-

appellants failed to respond within the time provided, this appeal would be dismissed for want of

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). Appellants failed to respond. Therefore, we dismiss this

appeal for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office (512) 854

- 9457 (512) 854

- 9457 (512) 854

- 9420 (512) 854

- 9669
fax: 854

- 4744 fax: 854

- 9549 fax: 854

- 4566 fax: 854

- 4457 

# Amalia Rodriguez

- Mendoza
Travis County District Clerk
Travis County Courthouse Complex

P.O. Box 1748 Austin, Texas 78767

March 27

, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals
P.O. BOX 12547 Austin, Texas 787 11

- 2547

Dear Mr. Kyle;

Re: D

- 1

- GN

- 0 9

- 001428

A clerk’s record in cause number TEXAS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE GUARANTY VS CORPSOL INC., CORPORATE SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL

, was due in your
office on MARCH 6 , 2015 and payment was received in our office on March 11, 2015; therefore I

will n eed to request an extension to file the record with your office.

If you have any question please contact me at (512) 854

- 5880.

Thank you,

Sincerely,

Patsy Ybarra Deputy Court Clerk, (512) 854

- 5880

cc: Court file
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 168 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 168

   Expressing the sense of Congress in support of victims of torture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2001

Ms. Ros-Lehtnen (for herself, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Rohrabacher, 
 Mr. Lantos, Mr. Gilman, Mr. Berman, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Engel, Mr. Leach, 
 Ms. McKinney, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Ackerman, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. 
 Crowley, and Ms. Lee) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress in support of victims of torture.

Whereas the people of the United States abhor the use of torture by any 
        government or person;
Whereas the existence of torture creates a climate of fear and international 
        insecurity that affects all people;
Whereas torture results in mental and physical damage to an individual that 
        destroys the individual's personality and terrorizes society and the 
        effects of torture can last a lifetime for the individual and can also 
        affect future generations;
Whereas repressive governments often use torture as a weapon against democracy 
        by eliminating the leadership of their opposition and frightening the 
        general public;
Whereas more than 500,000 survivors of torture live in the United States;
Whereas torture has devastating effects on the victim which often require 
        extensive medical and psychological treatment;
Whereas both the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-320) and the 
        Torture Victims Relief Reauthorization Act of 1999 (Public Law 106-87) 
        authorize funding for rehabilitation services for victims of torture so 
        that these individuals may become productive and contributing members of 
        their communities;
Whereas the United States played a leading role in the adoption of the Universal 
        Declaration of Human Rights and has ratified the United Nations 
        Convention Against Torture and Other Forms of Inhuman and Degrading 
        Treatment or Punishment; and
Whereas June 26th of each year is the United Nations International Day in 
        Support of Victims of Torture: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That, on the occasion of the United Nations International Day in 
Support of Victims of Torture, Congress pays tribute to all victims of 
torture in the United States and around the world who are struggling to 
overcome the physical scars and psychological effects of torture.
                                 <all>
```
# Jornal Oficial C 146/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 146 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 63.° ano4 de maio de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 146

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

63.° ano4 de maio de 2020

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Comissão Europeia |
| 2020/C 146/01 | Taxas de câmbio do euro — 30 de abril de 2020 | 1 |

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

2020/C 146/01

Taxas de câmbio do euro — 30 de abril de 2020

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

| 4.5.2020 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2020

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 146/1

---

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

30 de abril de 2020

(2020/C 146/01)

1 euro =

| | Moeda | Taxas de câmbio |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | dólar dos Estados Unidos | 1,0876 |
| JPY | iene | 115,87 |
| DKK | coroa dinamarquesa | 7,4584 |
| GBP | libra esterlina | 0,86905 |
| SEK | coroa sueca | 10,6639 |
| CHF | franco suíço | 1,0558 |
| ISK | coroa islandesa | 159,30 |
| NOK | coroa norueguesa | 11,1840 |
| BGN | lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | coroa checa | 27,097 |
| HUF | forint | 352,72 |
| PLN | zlóti | 4,5336 |
| RON | leu romeno | 4,8431 |
| TRY | lira turca | 7,5979 |
| AUD | dólar australiano | 1,6598 |
| CAD | dólar canadiano | 1,5077 |
| HKD | dólar de Hong Kong | 8,4300 |
| NZD | dólar neozelandês | 1,7705 |
| SGD | dólar singapurense | 1,5324 |
| KRW | won sul-coreano | 1 313,09 |
| ZAR | rand | 19,6572 |
| CNY | iuane | 7,6665 |
| HRK | kuna | 7,5790 |
| IDR | rupia indonésia | 16 178,05 |
| MYR | ringgit | 4,6767 |
| PHP | peso filipino | 54,772 |
| RUB | rublo | 79,8920 |
| THB | baht | 35,216 |
| BRL | real | 5,8565 |
| MXN | peso mexicano | 25,7953 |
| INR | rupia indiana | 81,6108 |

Moeda

Taxas de câmbio

USD

dólar dos Estados Unidos

1,0876

JPY

iene

115,87

DKK

coroa dinamarquesa

7,4584

GBP

libra esterlina

0,86905

SEK

coroa sueca

10,6639

CHF

franco suíço

1,0558

ISK

coroa islandesa

159,30

NOK

coroa norueguesa

11,1840

BGN

lev

1,9558

CZK

coroa checa

27,097

HUF

forint

352,72

PLN

zlóti

4,5336

RON

leu romeno

4,8431

TRY

lira turca

7,5979

AUD

dólar australiano

1,6598

CAD

dólar canadiano

1,5077

HKD

dólar de Hong Kong

8,4300

NZD

dólar neozelandês

1,7705

SGD

dólar singapurense

1,5324

KRW

won sul-coreano

1 313,09

ZAR

rand

19,6572

CNY

iuane

7,6665

HRK

kuna

7,5790

IDR

rupia indonésia

16 178,05

MYR

ringgit

4,6767

PHP

peso filipino

54,772

RUB

rublo

79,8920

THB

baht

35,216

BRL

real

5,8565

MXN

peso mexicano

25,7953

INR

rupia indiana

81,6108

---

(1)  Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27168-27169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11369]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public that a 
meeting of the Federal Aviation Administration Air Traffic Procedures 
Advisory Committee (ATPAC) will be held to review present air traffic 
control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 21, and Wednesday, June 
22, 2011 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at CGH Headquarters, 600 Maryland 
Ave., SW., Suite 800 West Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Dennis Roberts, ATPAC Executive 
Director, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. Telephone 
(202) 267-9205.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the ATPAC to be held Tuesday, June 21, and 
Wednesday, June 22, 2011 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The agenda for this 
meeting will cover a continuation of the ATPAC's review of present air 
traffic control procedures and practices for standardization, revision, 
clarification, and upgrading of terminology and procedures. It will 
also include:
    1. Approval of Minutes;
    2. Submission and Discussion of Areas of Concern;
    3. Discussion of Potential Safety Items;
    4. Report From Executive Director;
    5. Items of Interest; and
    6. Discussion and Agreement of Location and Dates for Subsequent 
Meetings.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
available. With the approval of the Chairperson, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons desiring to attend 
and persons desiring to present oral statements should notify Mr. 
Dennis Roberts no later than June 3, 2011. Any member of the public may 
present a written statement to the ATPAC at any time at the address 
given above.

[[Page 27169]]

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 3, 2011.
Dennis Roberts,
Executive Director, Air Traffic Procedures Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2011-11369 Filed 5-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```