alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Paul Kim, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cogent, Inc. (the Registrant);



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants independent registered public accounting firm and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors:



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.



Dated: November 15, 2004



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Kim                                
|Paul Kim                                    
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                               |                                   |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date: November              20, 2006 | By:                                      | /s/ Michel              St-Pierre |
|                                      | Name:              Michel St-Pierre                |
|                                      | Title:              Acting Chief Financial Officer |

----
Order filed September 13 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00626

- CV

____________ PANUNCIO COLORADO , Appellant

V.
PHUONG LUU AND THANH TAT , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

Travis County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 1

- CV

- 17

- 011359



### ORDER
On August 23, 2018, we ordered the Travis County Clerk to file the clerk’s record by September 7, 2018. The record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER the Travis County Clerk to file the clerk’s record by September 24, 2018 . If the record is not tim ely filed, we will take appropriate
action.

PER CURIAM
H. Con. Res. 176 Agreed to June 28, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

Thursday, June 28, 2001, or Friday, June 29, 2001, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July

10, 2001, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate

recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, June

28, 2001, Friday, June 29, 2001, Saturday, June 30, 2001, Monday,

July 2, 2001, Tuesday, July 3, 2001, Thursday, July 5, 2001, Friday,

July 6, 2001, or Saturday, July 7, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday,

July 9, 2001, or until such time on that day as may be specified

by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader

of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall

notify the Members of the House and the Senate, respectively,
H. Con. Res. 176—2

to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 24

Supporting a National Foster Parents Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 8, 2001

Mr. GILCHREST submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting a National Foster Parents Day.

Whereas the family, serving as the primary source of love,

identity, self-esteem, and support, is the very foundation

of our communities, and our United States;

Whereas over 142,000 foster families, who open their homes

and hearts to children whose families are in crisis, play

a vital role in helping children heal and reconnect and in

launching those children into successful adulthood;

Whereas 20,000 youth reach their 18th birthday and ‘‘age

out’’ of foster care each year, too often unprepared and

without the ongoing support and guidance of caring

adults; and

Whereas numerous individuals and public and private organizations work to increase public awareness of the needs of

children in foster care as well as recognition of the endur-
2

•HCON 24 IH

ing and valuable contributions of foster parents: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a National Foster Parents Day should be

4 established to recognize the contributions of foster

5 parents across the Nation; and

6 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

7 calling on the people of the United States and inter8 ested groups to conduct appropriate ceremonies, ac9 tivities, and programs to demonstrate support for

10 foster parents across the Nation.

Æ
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 247

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law

enforcement officers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BURNS, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

COVERDELL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. DEWINE,

Mr. GRAMM, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

SARBANES, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. WARNER, Mr. GORTON, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr.

BAYH, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. LEVIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Ms. COLLINS, Mr.

NICKLES, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr.

ROCKEFELLER, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. GREGG, Mr. KOHL, Mr. DODD,

Mr. LOTT, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. DOMENICI,

Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. KERRY, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. SMITH

of Oregon, Mr. ROBB, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. MACK, Mr. BYRD, and Mr.

ABRAHAM) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 15, 2000

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their

lives while serving as law enforcement officers.
2

SRES 247 ATS

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of this country is preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas more than 700,000 men and women, at great risk

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of peace;

Whereas peace officers are the front line in preserving our

children’s right to receive an education in a crime-free

environment, which is all too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 134 peace officers lost their lives in the performance

of their duty in 1999, and a total of nearly 15,000 men

and women have now made that supreme sacrifice;

Whereas every year 1 in 9 officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 officers is injured, and 1 in 4,400 officers is killed in the line

of duty; and

Whereas, on May 15, 2000, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in our Nation’s Capital to join

with the families of their recently fallen comrades to

honor them and all others before them: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 2000, as Peace Officers

3 Memorial Day, in honor of Federal, State, and local

4 officers killed or disabled in the line of duty; and

5 (2) calls upon the people of the United States

6 to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and

7 respect.

Æ
#### In re Guardianship of Wisner. 

(No. 31333

Decided May 5, 1948.)

*Messrs. Hart &*Hart, for appellee Kathleene Wisner Kaminski, former ward.

*Mr. Ralph*Atkinson, for appellant Harry J. Wisner, former administrator.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.

Hart, J., not participating.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SCO TT ERI C CO N N ER, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A A R O N D . WIN S L O W, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 55941 D. C . No . 5 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 2 1 8 - AG - AN ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea lfr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A ndr e w J . G ui l f

or d, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M ay25, 2010 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S c ottE r i c C onne r , aC a l i f orni as t at e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g v io la tio n s o f h is 

# FI LED JU N 15 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 55941 2 r i ght s unde rthe E i ghth and F ourt e e nth A m e ndm e nt s i n c onne c t i on w i th af i ght w i th anothe ri nm at e and e ns ui ng di s c ipl i narypr oc e e di ngs . W e have j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. W e r e vi e w de novo the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a lf or f a ilu r e to e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s , W y att v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1108, 1117 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) , an dw e a f f i rm. C o n n e rw a iv e dh is r ig h t to c h a lle n g e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s . See R ob bi ns v. Carey , 4 8 1 F .3 d1 1 4 3 , 1 1 4 6 - 4 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) ( f a ilu r e to o b

je c t to am a g is tr a te ju d g e ’s r e c o m m e n d a tio n w a iv e s a ll o b je c tio n s to th e m a g is tr a te j ud ge’ s f i nd i ng s of f

ac t , bu tdo es no tordi nari l y w ai ve obj ec t i on s t o p urel y l egal c o n c lu s io n s ) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dC o n n e r ’s c la im s b e c au s e h e f a ile dto e x h au s t a d m in is tr a tiv e r e m e d ie s p r io rto f ilin g s u it. Se e W

oodf ord v . N go , 548 U .S . 8 1 , 9 3 - 9 5 ( 2 0 0 6 ) ( h o ld in g th a t “p r o p e re x h au s tio n ” u n d e r4 2 U .S .C . § 1 99 7e(a ) i s m andat ory andre qu i re s a dh er ence t o adm i ni strat i ve procedural ru le s ) ; G r iffin v . A r

p a io , 55 7 F . 3d11 17 , 11 20 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( af fi rm i ng di sm i ss al for f ai l ure t o exh austpri son rem edi es w here i nm at e’ s gri evance f ai l ed t o “ al ert [] th e p r is o n to th e n a tu r e o f th e w r o n g f

o rw h ic h r e d r e s s [ w a s ] s o u g h t.” ) . C on ner’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. A F F I R M E D .
[No. 14616-2-III.

Division Three.

August 29, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John Manuel Guzman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Klick-itat County, No. 94-1-00061-8, Ted Kolbaba, J., entered January 3, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, C.J., concurred in by Thompson and Schultheis, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MuellerWater Products, Inc. (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith,the Chief Operating Officer of Mueller Water Products, Inc., certify that,to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Water Products, Inc.

| Date: February 3, 2006 |   |   |   |                      |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|                        |   |   |   |                      |
|                             |   | By:    |   | /s/ DALE B. SMITH         |
|                        |   |   |   | Dale B. Smith             |
|                        |   |   |   | *Chief Operating Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


[Cogent Logo and letterhead]


 


 


6715 Kenilworth Avenue Partnership


1015 31st Street, NW


Washington, DC  20007


 


 


RE:           Extension of Lease
Agreement dated Sept 1, 2000 and


Amendments and Extensions dated through Feb. 3,
2005


1015 31st Street, NW, Washington,
DC  20007


 


 


	
  Dear Mr. Schaeffer:

  	
   

  	
  July 21, 2005

  



 


In reference to the above subject Lease
Agreement between Cogent Communications, Inc., (Tenant) and 6715
Kenilworth Avenue Partnership (Landlord), the parties agree to extend the lease
referenced above for an additional one (1) year term with a new expiration
date of August 31, 2006.


 


All other conditions of the Lease, as amended
remain unchanged.


 


	
  TENANT: Cogent Communications, Inc.

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/Thaddeus G. Weed

  	
   

  
	
  Thaddeus G. Weed

  
	
  Title: Chief Financial Officer

  
	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  LANDLORD: 6715
  Kenilworth Avenue Partnership

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/Dave Schaeffer

  	
   

  
	
  Dave Schaeffer

  
	
  Title: General Partner
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements (2006Salaries)**

The following summarizes the certain compensation arrangementsestablished between NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the “Company”) and the executiveofficers through verbal agreements.

On March 7, 2006,the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company determinedthe following compensation information for certain executive officers of theCompany regarding base salary levels for 2006. This compensation information isas follows:

| Name                                       | ** ** | **Title**                                       | ** ** | **2006 Salary** |
|--------------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------|
| Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. |       | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |       | $               | 262,500 |
| Gary L. Gregory                            |       | Chief Operating Officer                         |       | $               | 246,750 |
| W. Bradford Smith                          |       | Chief Financial Officer                         |       | $               | 231,000 |
| Guy Daniello                               |       | Senior Vice President of Information Technology |       | $               | 190,181 |
| Michael Williams, Ph.D.                    |       | Senior Vice President of Engineering            |       | $               | 198,450 |

 

----
[No. 36408-1-I.

Division One.

August 26, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Glenn Gary Nichols, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 94-1-03518-1, Norma Smith Huggins, J., entered April 3, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kennedy, J., concurred in by Baker, C.J., and Coleman, J.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 24, 2015

d1116

Order 

Clerk

November 24, 2015

150224(55)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150224

COA: 314821

Oakland CC: 2012-240961-FH

DONALD CLAYTON STURGIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 31, 

2015 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, William Scott Marshall, President and a
director of Cascade Energy, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cascade Energy, Inc.
for the six month period ended August 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Cascade Energy, Inc.

Date: October 24, 2005

/s/ William Scott MarshallWilliam Scott Marshall
President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

---
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### ) In the Matter of: ) 

### ) ROMNEY CYCLE CENTER ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2015-0203 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

# REC

HEARIN DOCKET

Respondent ) FAA CaseNo. 2013S0700320 )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### §13.204(b), that it shall be represented 

### in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as follows:
Jeanine C. Gotimer Senior Attorney Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1 AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Email: Jeanine.Gotimer@faa.gov Telephone: (718) 553-3272 (718) 995-5699
Peter J. Lynch Assistant ChiefCounsel

for Enforcement
By: eanine C. Gotimer enior Attorney Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 1AviationPlaza Jamaica, NY 11434 Email: Jeanine.Gotimer@faa.gov

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 

## _51h day ofNovember, 2015, copies ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance were served by US Facsimile and also placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail

- Return Receipt Requested addressed as follows: Honorable J.E. Sullivan Administrative Law Judge US DOT/Office ofHearings M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor Room E12-320 Washington, DC 20590 (FAX) 202-366-7536 BrianE. Stolarz, Esq. Attorney for Respondent LeclairRyan 2318 Mill Road, Suite 1100 Alexandria, VA 22314 (FAX) 703-684-8075 Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Room 2014

Date: 

### NOV
- 5

## 2015

2