alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.3





CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION (IDENTIFIED BY **) HAS BEEN OMITTED BASED


UPON
A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 24b-2 OF


THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND HAS BEEN SEPARATELY FILED


WITH
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION




February
28, 2009




Larry
Smith


Koch
Foods, Inc.


9401 W.
Thunderbird Road, Suite 186


Peoria,
AZ 85381




Dear
Larry:





As
discussed and agreed, Koch Foods, Inc. will supply to the El Pollo Loco system
the following chicken products:





** pounds
annually of whole birds, EPL Specification **.  Pricing will be ** per
pound FOB; ** per pound delivered into MBM, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.





** pounds
annually of saddle cut chicken, EPL Specification **.  Pricing will be
** per pound FOB; ** per pound delivered to MBM, Rancho Cucamonga,
CA.





Up to **
pounds annually of fresh pre-marinated thigh meat, EPL Specification
**.  Pricing will be ** per pound FOB; ** per pound delivered into
MBM, Rancho Cucamonga, CA.





Frozen
pre-marinated thigh meat, EPL Specification **.  ** per pound FOB, **
per pound delivered MBM, Rancho Cucamonga and MBM, Pleasanton.





As part
of this Purchase Agreement, Supplier warrants that the prices for the items
identified herein are not higher than those currently extended to any other
customer for the same or like items in equal or less quantities. If Supplier
reduces its price for such items to any other customer during the term of this
Purchase Agreement, Supplier agrees to correspondingly reduce the price quoted
herein.





El Pollo
Loco’s decision to enter into this Purchase Agreement is independent of any
support your firm may or may not choose to provide to the El Pollo Loco
system.





This
Purchase Agreement is subject to and incorporates the General Terms and
Conditions of Supply (“T/C”) executed by the parties hereto and currently on
file with El Pollo Loco, Inc. The Purchase Agreement and the T/C collectively
constitute the entire agreement between the parties and supersede all prior or
contemporaneous oral or written agreements.





Terms:  Net
7 Days.


Pricing
contract period 03/01/09 through 2/28/10









Please
sign and return both copies of this letter.  After I have received the
signed copy, I will sign and return a copy for your files.  Signing
this letter acknowledges acceptance of the terms and conditions as presented
above.





Larry,
thank you for your help and support on this matter and please contact me with
any questions.




/S/
      LARRY P. SMITH
            /S/
      GARY CAMPANAROLarry
      P. Smith
            Gary
      CampanaroKoch
      Foods, Inc.
            El
      Pollo Loco, Inc.




cc:  Jennifer
Benus, Yvette Johnson/MBM
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, T.
Don Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ T. Don WaddellT.
      Don WaddellChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      16, 2010
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 163

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the historical significance of

Juneteenth Independence Day and expressing thesense of Congress that history be regarded as ameans of understanding the past and solving thechallenges of the future.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 163

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas news of the end of slavery did not reach frontier

areas of the country until long after the conclusion of the

Civil War, especially in the Southwestern United States;

Whereas the African Americans who had been slaves in the

Southwest thereafter celebrated June 19, known as

Juneteenth Independence Day, as the anniversary of

their emancipation;
2

•HCON 163 EH

Whereas these African Americans handed down that tradition

from generation to generation as an inspiration and encouragement for future generations;

Whereas Juneteenth Independence Day celebrations have

thus been held for 136 years to honor the memory of all

those who endured slavery and especially those who

moved from slavery to freedom; and

Whereas the faith and strength of character shown by these

former slaves remains an example for all people of the

United States, regardless of background, region, or race:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress recognizes the historical signifi4 cance of Juneteenth Independence Day, an impor5 tant date in the Nation’s history, and encourages

6 the continued celebration of this day to provide an

7 opportunity for all people of the United States to

8 learn more about the past and to better understand

9 the experiences that have shaped the Nation; and

10 (2) it is the sense of Congress that—

11 (A) history be regarded as a means for un12 derstanding the past and solving the challenges

13 of the future; and
3

•HCON 163 EH

1 (B) the celebration of the end of slavery is

2 an important and enriching part of the history

3 and heritage of the United States.

Passed the House of Representatives June 19, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Lazarus TAZRUK, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 6954.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

Dec. 30, 1982.

*789Joel H. Bolger, Asst. Public Defender, Barrow, and Dana Fabe, Public Defender, Anchorage, for appellant.

Larry C. Zervos, Asst. Dist. Atty., Harry L. Davis, Dist. Atty., Fairbanks, and Wilson L. Condon, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

Lazarus Tazruk was convicted in a jury trial of attempted sexual assault in the first degree, AS 11.41.410. He was sentenced by Judge Jay Hodges to eight years with five years suspended. He appeals this sentence as excessive. We affirm.

Tazruk is fifty-seven years old and has no prior felony convictions. He argues on appeal that his sentence exceeds the presumptive sentence which a second offender would receive. *Austin v. State,*627 P.2d 657 (Alaska App.1981). Attempted sexual assault in the first degree is a class B felony, and the presumptive sentence which a second offender would receive is four years. AS 11.41.410; AS 11.31.100(d)(2); AS 12.55.125(d)(1).

We conclude that a sentence of eight years with five suspended is not greater than the presumptive sentence of four years for purposes of applying the *Austin*rule. When we evaluate a sentence we consider the whole sentence including suspended time. However, in evaluating whether a sentence is in excess of the presumptive sentence which a second felony offender would receive, our primary focus should be on that portion of the sentence which imposes a period of incarceration. By that standard, the three years of imprisonment to which Tazruk is sentenced is less than the four years which a second felony offender would receive. In the event that the suspended portion of Tazruk’s sentence is later imposed, he would be entitled to bring a sentence appeal at that time. We conclude that Tazruk’s sentence does not violate the *Austin*rule.

We also conclude that Tazruk’s sentence is not clearly mistaken under the standards set forth in AS 12.55.005, which codifies the *Chaney*sentencing criteria.1 The evidence indicates that Tazruk attacked his victim, C.K., with the intent to rape her. C.K. was cut and bruised in an apparently violent attack. The attack was apparently ended when some people came out from a nearby home and Tazruk ran away. There was testimony that Tazruk used a knife in the attack, although we note that the trial judge specifically did not resolve the dispute as to whether a knife was used. Given the nature of the offense, we find that Judge Hodges was not clearly mistaken in imposing the sentence of eight years with five years suspended.

The sentence is AFFIRMED.

1

. *State v. Chaney,*477 P.2d 441 (Alaska 1970).
FILECOPY RE: Case No. 15-0285 DATE: 5/29/2015 COA #: 12-14-00327-CV TC#: 13-00267 STYLE: IN THE INTEREST OF K.W. AND P.W., CHILDREN 

### Todaythe Supreme Court of Texas denied the 

### petition for review in the above-referenced case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK 

### CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OFAIFE7£CS~ 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 35 TYLER, TX 75702
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge:          (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and          (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  February 14, 2007 /s/ Richard J. Naughton   Richard J. Naughton   Chief Executive Officer   
 

 
**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to herknowledge:          (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and          (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated:  February 14, 2007 /s/ Donna G. Lee   Donna G. Lee   Chief Financial Officer
#### Martin A. PLEASANT, Petitioner, v. Dan TIHONOVICH, Sheriff of the County of Pueblo, State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 82SA233.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 28, 1982.

J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Denver, Daniel W. Edwards, Deputy State Public Defender, Pueblo, for petitioner.

G. F. Sandstrom, Jr., Dist. Atty., Matthew Martin, Deputy Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner filed this original proceeding seeking a writ in the nature of manda*237mus under C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause why the respondent should not be ordered to grant petitioner credit on his Colorado sentence with the time he was in New Mexico pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers, section 24-60-501 et seq., C.R.S. 1973.

The District Attorney for Pueblo County has entered his appearance on behalf of the respondent and agrees with the petitioner that the time spent in New Mexico pursuant to the Agreement on Detainers should be counted against petitioner’s original sentence to the Pueblo County Jail.

The rule is made absolute.

DUBOFSKY, J., does not participate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8158

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

MARCUS D. DUKES,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:03-

cr-00133-RWT-1; 8:09-cv-00135-RWT)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus D. Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan E. Foreman, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Marcus D. Dukes seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Dukes has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of HMP Equity Holdings Corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Kimo Esplin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |  |  | /s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial OfficerDecember 8, 2004
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 9, 2020

No. 04-20-00427-CV

IN RE Gustavo GARCIA-SILLER, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Acting 

on Behalf of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Anita Valencia, as Independent Administrator 

of the Estate of Virgilio Elizondo,

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-08589

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

On October 9, 2020, relators filed an Opposed Third Motion for Emergency Relief,

requesting a stay of the trial court’s August 4, 2020 “Order on Motion to Compel,” including the

trial court’s decision to stay compliance with the contested order until October 13, 2020 at 5:00 

p.m. 

After consideration, relators’ request for a stay is GRANTED. The trial court’s August 

4, 2020 order, as extended on September 30, 2020, is STAYED pending further order of this 

court. 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-CI-08589, styled John Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese 

of San Antonio, by and through the Apostolic Administrator and Archbishop Gustavo Garcia-Siller and Archbishop 

Emeritus Patrick Flores, their predecessors and successors, as Archbishop of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of 

San Antonio, Father Jesus Armando Dominguez, the Estate of Father Virgilio Elizondo, Deceased; Bishop Gerald 

R. Barnes, his predecessors and successors, as Bishop of the Diocese of San Bernardino, in its assumed or common 

name; the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino, a Corporate sole aka Diocese of San Bernardino, pending in 

the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
#### Ovanna CARROLL, Appellant, v. Robert L. HATTON, M.D., Appellee.

No. 87-3006.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1988.

Richard G. Daniels of Daniels and Mason, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Debra J. Snow of Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order dismissing the cause of action for failure to prosecute upon authority of *Miami National Bank v. Greenfield,*488 So.2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) and *American Eastern Corporation v. Henry Blanton, Inc.,*382 So.2d 863 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). *Contra Dashew v. Marks,*352 So.2d 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Norflor Construction Corporation v. City of Gainesville,*512 So.2d 266 (Fla. 1st DCA *10891987), *review denied,*520 So.2d 585 (Fla. 1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
; l.ewvlu 

## ~

1 vw• `!'v ~e

; ~ ~j,~trE~~~r~ `~IC~ 

### ' o F1

ve.7 

# R G~ d/IiG GL a / V /


### Y/alLc/ ~ 

### e 

# ~ ~~ 

# 50 3e 0,

# 74

~ 

# u' J~ 

# 393, IV 14

- 

## 7 

# A-ay 3

'962. CC

/v A,~ l

7t~ 'v 

### C-to

ol 

# i a ld XTIQ) 6

# C' 

# 6it-p

)j 4-A F IA 

# To d-xL-c-Quwp-, -a/"-" u- 

# VJ a4

~ 

# - , ~



## I U42-Ccu) eXL (Dua 

### ~~ -
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
    
    the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Jeffrey KornblumPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**














**Certification
      of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Rotoblock Corporation
      (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Howard, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.








Date: August 13,
      2007 **ROTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION**





/s/ Thomas M. Howard


By: Thomas M. Howard, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer
      and
      Director
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 2001

Received; referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the services and sacrifices of the United States

merchant marine.

Whereas throughout our history, the United States merchant

marine has served the Nation during times of war;

Whereas the merchant marine served as the Nation’s first

navy, and defeated the British Navy to help gain the Nation’s independence;

Whereas during World War II more than 250,000 men and

women served in the merchant marine, and faced dangers
2

HCON 109 RFS

from the elements, and from mines, submarines, other

armed enemy vessels, and aircraft;

Whereas during World War II vessels of the merchant marine

fleet, such as the S.S. Lane Victory, provided critical

logistical support to the Armed Forces by carrying equipment, supplies, and personnel necessary to the war effort;

Whereas President Franklin D. Roosevelt and many military

leaders praised the role of the merchant marine as the

‘‘Fourth Arm of Defense’’ during World War II;

Whereas during World War II more than 6,800 members of

the merchant marine were killed at sea, more than

11,000 were wounded, and more than 600 were taken

prisoner;

Whereas 1 out of every 32 members of the merchant marine

serving during World War II died in the line of duty, a

higher percentage of war related deaths than in any of

the armed services;

Whereas, at a time when the people of the United States are

recognizing the contributions of the Armed Forces and

civilian personnel to the national security, it is appropriate to recognize the service of the merchant marine;

and

Whereas the merchant marine continues to serve and protect

the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice of members

4 of the United States merchant marine;
3

HCON 109 RFS

1 (2) recognizes the critical role played by vessels

2 of the United States merchant marine fleet in trans3 porting equipment, supplies, and personnel in sup4 port of the Nation’s defense;

5 (3) recognizes the historical significance of May

6 22 as National Maritime Day, so designated in 1933

7 to commemorate the anniversary of the first trans8 oceanic voyage under steam propulsion, and finds it

9 fitting and proper on this day of paying tribute to

10 our maritime history to pay special honor to the

11 merchant marine;

12 (4) encourages the American people and appro13 priate government agencies, through appropriate

14 ceremonies and activities, to recognize the services

15 and sacrifices of the United States merchant marine,

16 and to observe this day by displaying the flag of the

17 United States at their homes and other suitable

18 places; and

19 (5) requests that all ships sailing under the

20 United States flag prominently display the flag on

21 this day.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 11, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 07

‐ 3399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee

,

v.

BRANDON L. SINGLETON,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

No. 07 CR 30030

Michael J. Reagan,

Judge

.

O R D E R

On November 24, 2008, we issued a limited remand under United States v. Taylor

, 520

F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 2008), asking the district court to inform us whether it wished to

resentence Brandon Singleton in light of Kimbrough v. United States

, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). See

United States v. Singleton

, 548 F.3d 589 (7th Cir. 2008). The district court has now advised us

that it is inclined to resentence Singleton. Therefore, we VACATE Singleton’s sentence and

REMAND for resentencing. 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DONALD ROBERTS, MARILYN ROBERTS 

AND JASON ROBERTS,

Petitioners

v.

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., 

BRENNTAG NORTHEAST, INC., BARLEY 

SNYDER, AND ALAN J. HAY, M.D.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 669 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of May, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.