alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 146

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Friday, May 25, 2001, or Saturday, May 26,

4 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res5 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand
2

•HCON 146 EH

1 adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, June 5, 2001, or until

2 noon on the second day after Members are notified to reas3 semble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

4 whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses

5 or adjourns at the close of business on Saturday, May 26,

6 2001, Sunday, May 27, 2001, or Tuesday, May 29, 2001,

7 on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

8 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

9 or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, June 5, 2001, or

10 until such time on that day as may be specified by its

11 Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

12 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

13 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

14 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

15 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

16 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

17 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead18 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House

19 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

20 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives May 26 (legislative day, May 25), 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 146

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the

House of Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.
University of Southern California is hereby submitting this amendment on their behalf in 

accordance with Section 333 of the FMRA. This is a request to amend Exemption No. 13505 

(Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-3647) for the applicant under this Docket to add additional 

aircraft and include the updated conditions and limitations, as follows:

Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems

The Petitioner requests that their Exemption No. 13505 is updated to include that their operator 

is authorized to use any aircraft identified on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems 

(UAS) under Section 333 at regulatory docket FAA-2007-3330 at www.regulations.gov, when 

weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. 

Updated Conditions and Limitations

That Petitioner requests that their Exemption No. 13505 is updated to include the thirty-two new 

conditions and limitations as adopted by the Federal Aviation Administration on or about March 

6, 2016, which includes and outlines operations conducted closer than 500 feet to people directly 

participating in the intended purpose of the operation, not protected by barriers as defined in 

those new additional conditions and limitations. The Petitioner further requests that it be allowed 

to fly under and in compliance with any new version of a standard Section 333 Exemption 

provided to any future Petitioners. 

Please note that all other conditions and information are to remain the same with the exception 

for the change above.

The primary contact for this application, which a copy to Traverse Legal, PLC at the address 

below, is:

Mr. Ryan Mcalinden

Associate Director for Digital Training and Instruction

University of Southern California

12015 Waterfront Drive

Playa Vista, CA 90094

Contact Information for Traverse Legal, PLC:

Enrico Schaefer, Esq.

Traverse Legal, PLC

810 Cottageview Drive, Unit G-20

Traverse City, MI 49684

Telephone: 231-932-0411 231-932-0411

Email: enrico@traverselegal.com

For additional information on this Exemption please contact Petitioner’s represented at the 

information provided above.

Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,

Enrico Schaefer, Esq.

Traverse Legal, PLC

Attorney for University of Southern California

Email: enrico@traverselegal.com

www.dronelaw.pro

www.traverselegal.com
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Annual Report of Swap-a-Debt Inc., (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the annual period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Edward C. DeFeudis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
April 15, 2009
  /s/
      Edward C. DeFeudisEdward
      C. DeFeudisPresident,
      Chief Financial Officer,
                      Principal
      Accounting Officer
                      and
      Chairman of the
Board
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 184 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

            Providing for a National Day of Reconciliation.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That on a day of reconciliation selected jointly by the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 
and with the Chaplain of the House of Representatives and the Chaplain 
of the Senate in attendance--
            (1) the two Houses of the Congress shall assemble in the 
        Hall of the House of Representatives at a time when the two 
        Houses are not in session; and
            (2) during this assembly, the Members of the two Houses may 
        gather to humbly seek the blessings of Providence for 
        forgiveness, reconciliation, unity, and charity for all people 
        of the United States, thereby assisting the Nation to realize 
        its potential as the champion of hope, the vindicator of the 
        defenseless, and the guardian of freedom.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 3 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 3

            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Fixing the hour of daily meeting of the Senate.

    Resolved, That the hour of daily meeting of the Senate be 12 
o'clock meridian unless ortherwise ordered.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 71

Expressing the sense of the Senate rejecting a tax increase on investment

income of certain associations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. GRAMM, and Mr.

INHOFE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Finance

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate rejecting a tax increase

on investment income of certain associations.

Whereas the President’s fiscal year 2000 Federal budget proposal to impose a tax on the interest, dividends, capital

gains, rents, and royalties in excess of $10,000 of trade

associations and professional societies exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 represents an unjust and unnecessary penalty on legitimate

association activities;

Whereas at a time when the Government is projecting onbudget surpluses of more than $800,000,000,000 over

the next 10 years, the President proposes to increase the

tax burden on trade and professional associations by

$1,440,000,000 over the next 5 years;
2

•SRES 71 IS

Whereas the President’s association tax increase proposal will

impose a tremendous burden on thousands of small and

mid-sized trade associations and professional societies;

Whereas under the President’s association tax increase proposal, most associations with annual operating budgets of

as low as $200,000 or more will be taxed on investment

income and as many as 70,000 associations nationwide

could be affected by this proposal;

Whereas associations rely on this targeted investment income

to carry out exempt-status-related activities, such as

training individuals to adapt to the changing workplace,

improving industry safety, providing statistical data, and

providing community services;

Whereas keeping investment income free from tax encourages

associations to maintain modest surplus funds that cushion against economic and fiscal downturns; and

Whereas corporations can increase prices to cover increased

costs, while small and medium-sized local, regional, and

State-based associations do not have such an option, and

thus increased costs imposed by the President’s association tax increase would reduce resources available for the

important standard-setting, educational training, and

professionalism training performed by associations: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that Con2 gress should reject the President’s proposed tax increase

3 on investment income of associations as defined under sec4 tion 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Æ
#### B & B SIDING CO., INC. v. Sam HENRY.

No. 57136.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Sept. 16, 1987.

V. Douglas Gunter, Jackson, for appellant.

Richard H. Young, Creel & Young, Brandon, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Fred L. Banks, Jr., Judge.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and DAN M. LEE and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Paula GOODWIN v. Kenneth W. DALTON & D.M. Yount.

No. 58025.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 5, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 7, 1988.

Ralph E. Chapman, Chapman & Heaton, Clarksdale, Lamar & Lamar, Senatobia, for appellant.

Shelby D. Goza, Marjorie Hankins, Ethridge, Grisham & Goza, Oxford, for ap-pellees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Tate County; George C. Carlson, Jr., Judge.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.47
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC. 2006 INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
 
  R E C I T A L S :
 1.
    
    The Company maintains the Allied Waste Industries, Inc. 2006 Incentive Stock
Plan, as most recently amended and restated on July 27, 2006 (Plan);2.
    
    The Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan in whole or in part; and3.
    
    The Company intends to amend the Plan.
  1.
    
    Section 20(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 Adjustment of Shares Available
 2.
    
    Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the
Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
 ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Delaware
     corporationByJo Lynn White, Vice Presidentand Acting General Counsel 1
#### Velda Charlene DURBIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. 0-79-254.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 30, 1981.

David Jordan, Moore, for appellant.

*376No appearance for appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

On appeal from an order revoking the order suspending the judgment and sentence rendered in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Case No. CRF-72-979 and CRF-73-154, the appellant argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the order entered by the Honorable Carmon C. Harris. We disagree.

The evidence reveals that Velda Charlene Durbin, posing as Mrs. Farrill H. Rogers, signed a check drawn upon the account of Farrill Rogers at Liberty National Bank and received Two-Hundred Fifty-Six Dollars and Seventy-Five Cents ($256.75) worth of groceries from the Crest Food Store. She was subsequently arrested attempting to secure approval of a check drawn on the account of Farrill Rogers at Brannon Grocery. Mr. Rogers testified that the defendant had been temporarily employed by him in his law office under the last name “Lehr”, and subsequent to her employment, he discovered a book of checks on his personal account was missing. He denied that he had ever been married to her, or given permission for her to represent herself as Mrs. Farrill Rogers and cash a check on his personal account. Clearly this was sufficient to support the allegation of forgery in the State’s motion to revoke and we accordingly, AFFIRM.

BRETT, P. J., and CORNISH, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 347 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 347

Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000, 
               as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 2000

Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Collins, 
Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. 
 Hatch) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 15, 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000, 
               as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week.

Whereas 1 out of every 55 women will develop ovarian cancer at some point during 
        her life;
Whereas over 70 percent of women with ovarian cancer will not be diagnosed until 
        ovarian cancer has spread beyond the ovary;
Whereas prompt diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial to effective treatment, 
        with the chances of curing the disease before it has spread beyond the 
        ovaries ranging from 85 to 90 percent, as compared to between 20 and 25 
        percent after the cancer has spread;
Whereas several easily identifiable factors, particularly a family history of 
        ovarian cancer, can help determine how susceptible a woman is to 
        developing the disease;
Whereas effective early testing is available to women who have a high risk of 
        developing ovarian cancer;
Whereas heightened public awareness can make treatment of ovarian cancer more 
        effective for women who are at-risk; and
Whereas the Senate, as an institution, and members of Congress, as individuals, 
        are in unique positions to help raise awareness about the need for early 
        diagnosis and treatment for ovarian cancer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 17, 2000, through 
        September 23, 2000, as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
        National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week with appropriate 
        recognition and activities.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 291 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  2d Session

                            H. CON. RES. 291

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of the Congress with respect to the disease 
                             endometriosis.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 291

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas endometriosis is a painful, chronic gynecologic disease;
Whereas, with such disease, tissue that is similar to the endometrium (the 
        tissue lining the inside of the uterus) grows outside the uterus in the 
        abdominal cavity and results in internal bleeding, inflammation, and the 
        development of scar tissue because the tissue has no means of leaving 
        the body (unlike the monthly development and shedding of the endometrium 
        through the menstruation process);
Whereas an estimated 10 to 20 percent of American women of childbearing age have 
        endometriosis;
Whereas endometriosis is a poorly understood disease and can strike women of any 
        socioeconomic class, age, or race;
Whereas the disease can affect a woman's ability to work, ability to reproduce, 
        and relationships with her mate, children, and everyone around her;
Whereas infertility occurs in about 30 to 40 percent of women with 
        endometriosis;
Whereas the cause of endometriosis is unknown;
Whereas the disease can only be definitively diagnosed through gynecologic 
        surgery;
Whereas studies have shown that the average delay in actual diagnosis is more 
        than nine years; and
Whereas there is no definitive cure for endometriosis: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) strongly supports efforts to raise public awareness of 
        endometriosis throughout the medical and lay communities; and
            (2) recognizes the need for better support of patients with 
        endometriosis, the need for physicians to better understand the 
        disease, the need for more effective treatments, and 
        ultimately, the need for a cure.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 1, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- HP Enterprise Services LLC Under Contract No. NNXl lAAOlC APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58683, 58940

Richard J. Conway, Esq. Michael J. Slattery, Esq. Andrew E. Smith, Esq. Adele H. Lack, Esq.

Dickstein Shapiro LLP Washington, DC Vincent A. Salgado, Esq.

NASA ChiefTrial Attorney Victoria H. Kauffman, Esq. James T. Mahoney, Esq. Alexander T. Bakos, Esq. Troy D. Taylor, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Office ofthe General Counsel National Aeronautics and Space

Administration Washington, DC ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 17 November 2014
,-u....... 7

# t '7 c ___ ,/· ,,..·, ,? 

### /? .,,- - i,,**~**

# l**-Z,(_~** ELIZABETfl-1\v. NEWSOM Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58683, 58940, Appeals ofHP Enterprise Services LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John D. Belew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John D. BelewJohn
      D. BelewChief
      Executive OfficerNovember 15,
      2010
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 236

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and Election

of the President and Vice President of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Nomination and Election of the President and Vice President

of the United States.

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Rules and Adminis2 tration shall prepare a revised edition of the document en3 titled Nomination and Election of the President and Vice

4 President of the United States, Senate Document 102–

5 14, and that such document shall be printed as a Senate

6 document.

7 SEC. 2. There shall be printed, beyond the usual

8 number, 600 additional copies of the document specified
2

•SRES 236 ATS

1 in the first section for the use of the Committee on Rules

2 and Administration.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00100-CV

In the Matter of P.E.J. §

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 1

of Wichita County (37639-LR-D)

August 15, 2013

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM