alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Soyster Unemployment Compensation Case.

*548Argued March 12, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Jennie P.*Soyster, appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.

*Sydney*Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with him *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

April 12, 1962:

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which claimant has appealed from the denial of benefits by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Iler application was disallowed by the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee, and the Board of Review for the reason that she voluntarily terminated her employment and was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of section 402-(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(b) (1).

Appellant was last employed by the Martinsburg Shoe Company, Martinsburg, Pennsylvania, where she had worked for seven and a half years. Her last day of work was January 19, 1961. On January 6, 1961, she gave two weeks’ notice that she was terminating her employment because of dissatisfaction with another employe. On January 16, 1961, appellant at*549tempted to retract her notice of termination, but it was not accepted by her employer because arrangements had been made for her replacement. There was testimony to the effect that another employe was being trained for that particular job after appellant gave notice that she was quitting.

The board found that under the circumstances appellant’s separation was voluntary and without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature, and that she was accordingly disqualified from receiving benefits Tinder the provisions of the Law. *Cunningham Unemployment Compensation Case,*193 Pa. Superior Ct. 172, 164 A. 2d 29.

The findings of fact made by the board are supported by the evidence and are conclusive. *Progress Manufacturing Company, Inc., v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review,*406 Pa. 163, 176 A. 2d 632.

It is significant that appellant, having given two weeks’ notice to quit, set in motion the process whereby arrangements were made for her replacement. Wc have recently held that a resignation voluntarily sub mitted could, under the circumstances, be relied upon by the employer notwithstanding a belated attempt to withdraw by the employe. *Dykan Unemployment Compensation Case,*197 Pa. Superior Ct. 153, 177 A. 2d 160.

It is apparent from the record that appellant gave the two weeks’ notice because of her dissatisfaction with another employe, and that her resignation was accepted and acted upon. The conclusion of the board was in conformity with the facts found.

The decision of the board is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

** (Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuantto section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”),does hereby certify that:

 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2008(the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 

June 24,2008

 

 
|   | /s/  Brian S. Moore      |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Brian  S. Moore          |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/  Fred L. Hite        |
|   | Fred  L. Hite            |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

p0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146323

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146323

COA: 312012 

Ionia CC: 2011-015058-FH

DASHI HURSEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 10, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

98–967 2016

S. HRG. 114–370 

[ERRATA] 

THE STATUS OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES 

WITHIN THE AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE 

COMMITTEE ON 

ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

JANUARY 21, 2016 

( 

Printed for the use of the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov 

[ERRATA] 

An error was made on the cover. The wrong session was printed. 

The first session was printed instead of the second session.
EXHIBIT 31.2



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Adam Wasserman, certify that:





1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 of S.E. Asia Trading Company, Inc;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



November 20, 2006



| | By: | /s/ Adam Wasserman                     
| | --- | ---------------------------------------
| |     | Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 281

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the ultimate sacrifice made by Johnny

Micheal Spann, the first American killed in combat during the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and pledging continued support for members of the Armed Forces.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 281

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas as part of the war against terrorism, United States

military personnel and agents from the Central Intelligence Agency were involved in combat with Taliban

forces during a prison uprising in Mazar-e Sharif, Afghanistan, on Sunday, November 25, 2001;

Whereas Johnny Micheal Spann, age 32, an officer in the

Central Intelligence Agency, was inside the prison for-
2

•HCON 281 EH

tress interviewing Taliban prisoners when the uprising

began;

Whereas Spann was killed in this rebellion and is the first

American known to be killed in combat in Afghanistan

during this war;

Whereas Spann is the 79th employee of the Central Intelligence Agency killed in the line of duty;

Whereas the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency,

George J. Tenet, hailed Spann as an American hero and

will soon memorialize him on a wall of honor;

Whereas Spann, a former Captain in the Marine Corps, is

survived by his wife, Shannon, and 3 young children; and

Whereas the thoughts and prayers of the Congress and the

Nation remain with the families of Spann and all the soldiers fighting to ensure the Nation’s freedom and safety:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors Johnny Micheal Spann, a para4 military officer in the Central Intelligence Agency,

5 who was the first American killed in combat during

6 the war against terrorism in Afghanistan, and recog7 nizes him for his bravery and sacrifice;

8 (2) extends its deepest sympathies to the family

9 of this brave hero; and
3

•HCON 281 EH

1 (3) pledges its continued support for the men

2 and women who risk their lives every day to ensure

3 the safety of all United States citizens.

Passed the House of Representatives December 11,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1767

KATHERINE A. HOOVER, M.D.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN

RESOURCES; MARY ANN MCNEIL; AUBURN COOPER;

WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF MEDICINE; RONALD D.

WALTON; A. PAUL BROOKS, M.D.; U. GRANT YOUNG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Dennis Raymond Knapp,

Senior District Judge. (CA-97-86-2)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Katherine A. Hoover, Appellant Pro Se. Charles R. Bailey, Belinda

B. Jackson, SHUMAN, ANNAND & POE, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoover v. West

Virginia Dep't HHR, No. CA-97-86-2 (S.D.W Va. May 9, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 190

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Alcohol

and Drug Addiction Recovery Month.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 190

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas 26,000,000 people in the United States are addicted

to drugs or alcohol;

Whereas 85 percent of all crime in the United States is related to drug or alcohol addiction;

Whereas the taxpayers of the United States paid more than

$150,000,000,000 in drug-related criminal and medical

costs in 1997, which is more than they spent in that year
2

•HCON 190 EH

on education, transportation, agriculture, energy, space

exploration, and foreign aid combined;

Whereas each dollar invested in drug and alcohol treatment

yields 7 dollars in savings from decreased health care

costs, criminal justice costs, and work-related costs

caused by absenteeism, injuries, and poor performance;

Whereas treatment for addiction is as effective as treatments

for other chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes and

high blood pressure;

Whereas adolescents who receive treatment for addiction report using less marijuana and alcohol and being involved

in less criminal activity;

Whereas addiction treatment for adolescents also improves

the school performance and psychological health of the

adolescents;

Whereas a number of organizations and individuals dedicated

to fighting addiction and promoting treatment and recovery will recognize September 2001 as National Alcohol

and Drug Addiction Recovery Month;

Whereas the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment of the

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration sponsors the celebration of National Alcohol and

Drug Addiction Recovery Month to encourage citizen action to help expand and improve the availability of effective addiction treatment;

Whereas National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery

Month celebrates the tremendous achievements of individuals who have undergone successful addiction treatment

and recognizes those in the field of addiction treatment

who have dedicated their lives to helping people recover

from addiction; and
3

•HCON 190 EH

Whereas the 2001 national campaign for National Alcohol

and Drug Addiction Recovery Month embraces the theme

of ‘‘We Recover Together: Family, Friends and Community’’ and seeks to increase awareness about alcohol and

drug addiction and promote treatment and recovery for

the millions of Americans who need it: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideas

3 of National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month.

Passed the House of Representatives July 30, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

 

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Group, Inc. (the “Report”)for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

I, Dale B. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of Mueller Group, Inc.,certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofMueller Group, Inc.

 

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 | By:    | /s/ DALE B. SMITH       |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       |   | Dale B. Smith           |
|                       |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Donald L. GLADNEY v. CITY OF JACKSON.

No. 57852.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 3, 1988.

E.P. Lobrano, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Matthew M. Moore, Jackson, for appel-lee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; Fred L. Banks, Jr., Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19263]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7815]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7815 Filed 3-28-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 350 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 350

Expressing the sense of Congress that amnesty should not be granted to 
     individuals who are in the United States, or its territories, 
                               illegally.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2002

  Mr. Kerns submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that amnesty should not be granted to 
     individuals who are in the United States, or its territories, 
                               illegally.

Whereas in 2000, there were an estimated 8,000,000 illegal aliens living in the 
        United States according to the Bureau of the Census;
Whereas the granting of amnesty under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 
        1986 has not curtailed the flow of illegal aliens to the United States;
Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would reward those who break the laws 
        of the United States;
Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would demonstrate that the United 
        States is not committed to upholding and enforcing its laws;
Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens could encourage additional illegal 
        immigration;
Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would undermine the process of legal 
        immigration into the United States;
Whereas it is vital to national security to ensure the integrity of the Nation's 
        borders;
Whereas the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, further demonstrated the 
        necessity of securing the Nation's borders; and
Whereas granting amnesty to illegal aliens would subvert the efforts of the 
        Border Patrol, the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Customs 
        Service, the Coast Guard, and other agencies that work to secure the 
        Nation's borders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that amnesty should not be granted to 
individuals who are in the United States, or its territories, 
illegally.
                                 <all>
```
#### Billy R. TOTMAN v. CITY PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.

No. 86-C-2485.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Totman, Billy R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA/85/1103; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 271541.

Prior report: La.App., 498 So.2d 302.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 244

Authorizing the printing of a revised edition of the publication entitled ‘‘Our

Flag’’.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 9, 2001

Mr. NEY (for himself and Mr. HOYER) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

OCTOBER 9, 2001

Committee on House Administration discharged; considered under suspension

of the rules and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of a revised edition of the

publication entitled ‘‘Our Flag’’.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF REVISED EDITION OF ‘‘OUR

4 FLAG’’.

5 A revised edition of the publication entitled ‘‘Our

6 Flag’’, revised under the direction of the Joint Committee

7 on Printing, shall be printed as a House document.
2

•HCON 244 ATH

1 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

3 (b), there shall be printed a number of copies of the publi4 cation described in section 1 as follows:

5 (1) 250,000 for the use of the House of Rep6 resentatives, distributed in equal numbers to each

7 Member of the House and each Delegate and Resi8 dent Commissioner to the Congress.

9 (2) 51,500 for the use of the Senate, distrib10 uted in equal numbers to each Senator.

11 (3) 2,000 for the use of the Joint Committee on

12 Printing.

13 (4) 1,400 for distribution to the depository li14 braries.

15 (b) ALTERNATIVE NUMBER.—If the total printing

16 and production costs of the number of copies provided

17 under subsection (a) exceed $150,000, there shall be

18 printed the maximum number of copies of the publication

19 described in section 1 for which such total costs do not

20 exceed $150,000, with distribution allocated in the same

21 proportion as in subsection (a).

Æ
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 184

Providing for a National Day of Reconciliation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 10, 2001

Mr. DELAY (for himself, Mr. HALL of Ohio, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr.

WOLF, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BISHOP, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. TURNER, Mr.

SHOWS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. HOSTETTLER, Mr.

TANCREDO, Mr. MCINTYRE, and Mr. PICKERING) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a National Day of Reconciliation.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That on a day of reconciliation selected joint3 ly by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and

4 the President pro tempore of the Senate, and with the

5 Chaplain of the House of Representatives and the Chap6 lain of the Senate in attendance—

7 (1) the two Houses of the Congress shall as8 semble in the Hall of the House of Representatives;

9 and
2

•HCON 184 IH

1 (2) during this assembly, the Members of the

2 two Houses may gather to humbly seek the blessings

3 of Providence for forgiveness, reconciliation, unity,

4 and charity for all people of the United States,

5 thereby assisting the Nation to realize its potential

6 as the champion of hope, the vindicator of the de7 fenseless, and the guardian of freedom.

Æ