alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 294

Designating the month of October 2000 as ‘‘Children’s Internet Safety

Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25, 2000

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

CONRAD, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr.

GRASSLEY, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. GORTON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. GREGG,

Mr. DEWINE, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. HAGEL,

Mr. GRAMS, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. HATCH, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr.

DOMENICI, Mr. BYRD, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. GRAMM, and Mr. AKAKA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 15, 2000

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of October 2000 as ‘‘Children’s

Internet Safety Month’’.

Whereas the Internet is one of the most effective tools available for purposes of education and research and gives

children the means to make friends and freely communicate with peers and family anywhere in the world;

Whereas the new era of instant communication holds great

promise for achieving better understanding of the world

and providing the opportunity for creative inquiry;
2

SRES 294 ATS

Whereas it is vital to the well-being of children that the

Internet offer an open and responsible environment to explore;

Whereas access to objectionable material, such as violent, obscene, or sexually explicit adult material may be received

by a minor in unsolicited form;

Whereas there is a growing concern in all levels of society to

protect children from objectionable material;

Whereas the technological option for parents or guardians to

filter, block, or review objectionable Internet material is

available and effective;

Whereas information on Internet filtering or blocking technology is unavailable to many parents or guardians; and

Whereas the Internet is a positive educational tool and should

be seen in such a manner rather than as a vehicle for entities to make objectionable materials available to children: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates October 2000 as ‘‘Children’s

3 Internet Safety Month’’ and supports its official sta4 tus on the Nation’s promotional calendar; and

5 (2) supports parents and guardians in pro6 moting the creative development of children by en7 couraging the use of the Internet in a safe, positive

8 manner with the aid of Internet filtering and block9 ing technologies.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Rick R. Holley, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 27, 2009By:

/S/  RICK R. HOLLEYRICK R. HOLLEY President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Certificate of Amendment



 Exhibit 10.5 
  

					
	 State of Delaware
 Secretary of State
 Division of Corporations
 Delivered 07:04 PM 06/15/2005
 FILED 06:58 PM 06/15/2005
 SRV 050501785 - 3919647 FILE
	 	 	 	 

  
 CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT TO THE 
 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 OF MYSPACE, INC. 
  
 Christopher DeWolfe
hereby certifies that: 
  
 ONE: The date of
filing of the original Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware was February 10, 2005. 
  
 TWO: He is the duly elected and acting President of MySpace, Inc., a Delaware corporation. 
  
 THREE: The Board of Directors of the corporation,
acting in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions amending its Certificate of Incorporation as follows: 
  
 Article IV, Section A is hereby amended and restated as follows: 

 
 The Company is authorized to issue two classes of stock
to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock.” and “Preferred Stock” The total number of shares that the Company is authorized to issue is sixty million nine hundred thirty thousand (60,930,000) shares, sixty million
(60,000,000) shares of which shall be Common Stock (the “Common Stock”) and nine hundred thirty thousand (930,000) shares of which shall be Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) The Preferred Stock shall have a par value of
one-tenth of one cent ($0.001) per share and the Common Stock shall have a par value of twenty-five thousandths of one cent ($0.00025) per share 
  
 FOUR: Thereafter, pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the
stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
  
 FIVE: All other provisions of the Certificate of Incorporation shall remain in full force and effect.










 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its President this 15th day of June 2005. 
  

			
	MYSPACE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/S/    CHRISTOPHER
DEWOLFE        
	 	 	Christopher DeWolfe, President
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

VIRASB VAHIDI 

Senior Vice President -

Marketing and Planning 

and Chief Commercial Officer 

American Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

May 10, 2013 

WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. 

Senior Vice President -

Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 
Motion of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby 

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2013, be accorded 

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. 

The information for which confidential treatment is requested 

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine 

acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report 

electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data 

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the 

current submission should also receive confidential treatment 

for 10 years. 
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being 

submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be 

withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 

10 years. 

May 10, 2013 

Respectfully submitted, 

Francis C. Heil 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                        ------------------------------

     Yankee Gas Services Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.
It is incorporated in Connecticut and does business under its own name.

     Yankee Energy Financial Services Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the registrant.  It is incorporated in Connecticut and does business under its
own name.

     Yankee Energy Services Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
registrant.  It is incorporated in Connecticut and does business under its own
name in Connecticut and New Jersey.

     NorConn Properties, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.
It is incorporated in Connecticut and does business under its own name.

     R.M. Services, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant. It is
incorporated in Connecticut and does business under its own name in Connecticut,
Alaska, Arizona, California, D.C., Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan,
Minnesota, New Jersey, South Carolina, Vermont and West Virginia; R.M. Services,
Inc. does business in Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Utah under the name R.M. Connecticut
Services, Inc.; in Massachusetts under the name REC Management Services; and in
North Dakota under the name CT RMS, Inc.
#### Randale L. COLE, Appellant, v. Richard DUGGER, Appellee.

No. 88-1801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 25, 1989.

*1297Randale Cole, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth and Isabelle Tas-si, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a prisoner, appeals the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus, in which he sought to compel the Department of Corrections to grant him administrative gain time pursuant to section 944.276,1 Florida Statutes (1987). We reverse.

Appellant was convicted of attempted second degree murder, armed robbery, pet-it theft, and kidnapping. Two additional charges of sexual battery were nolle prossed. The Department denied appellant’s request for administrative gain time based upon his ineligibility under section 944.276(l)(c) as one who had been convicted of sexual battery or an offense specified in section 917.012(1), Florida Statutes (1987) (procedures for handling and treating mentally disordered sex offenders).

Since the sexual battery charges were nolle prossed, these cannot be the basis for a denial of administrative gain time. *See Mayo v. Dugger,*535 So.2d 300 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

The Department also argues that appellant’s kidnapping conviction may constitute grounds for ineligibility in that the kidnapping was performed with intent to commit sexual battery. The flaw in this argument becomes apparent when we examine the charging document. The information charged appellant with kidnapping,

> with the intent to commit or facilitate the commission of a felony, to-wit: robbery, sexual battery or murder, or with the intent to inflict bodily harm upon or to terrorize.

Thus, to find that claimant was convicted of kidnapping with intent to commit sexual battery we would have to disregard the mention of intent to inflict harm or to terrorize, which is a separate and distinct intent in the kidnapping statute. *See*§ 787.01(l)(a)(3), Fla.Stat. (1987). Furthermore, we would have to speculate that the felony appellant intended to commit or facilitate was that of sexual battery rather than one of the others mentioned in the information. This we are not permitted to do.

Accordingly, the trial court’s order denying appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus is hereby reversed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

NIMMONS, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.

1

. We note that this section has been repealed and replaced by section 944.277, Florida Statutes (Supp.1988).
#### STATE ex rel. Lawrence RILEY v. Jack DONNELLY, Jr., Warden, Washington Correctional Institute.

No. 88-KH-1226.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 27, 1988.

In re Riley, Lawrence; applying for mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 252-326.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to act on relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus filed via certified mail in April, 1988.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Standard Review Draft 12/24/2008 

ENGINEER: Arnold \ CPW 

PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No 

Gen Eqpt: safety glasses or goggles/ chemical resistant gloves 

and protective clothing/ adequate ventilation 

Respirator: follow OSHA respirator regulations 

Health Effects: Irritating to eyes and respiratory system/ 

slight skin irritation may occur/ may irritate gastrointestinal 

tract/ mucus membrane irritant 

TLV/PEL: 

none established 

CRSS : 

Chemical Name: [5,6]Fullerene-C70-D5h(6) 

S-H20: 0.000001 g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 841.00 %<500 %<1000 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Neat: Mfg: Proc/Form: End Use:
Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (11/21/2008): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: 

. 

Migration to groundwater: U 

PBT rating: P1B1T1 LVE PBT Rating is PU BU T1 

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation 

Eco: 1 No releases to Water 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1-2B 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

P2 Claim:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis: 
Inhalation:

Dermal: 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT. 
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 09-0055 

Number of Sites/ Location:

unknown site(s) 

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may 

coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same 

medium. Note: Water not required per SAT.
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY 

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
Exhibit 35.1





Servicer Compliance Statement of AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.








This Annual Statement as to Compliance is delivered to you pursuant to Section 4.10 (a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 21, 2021 (the “Agreement”) and Item 1123 of Regulation AB, executed in connection with the formation of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3 (the “Trust”), the issuance of the Notes by the Trust and the closing of the transactions and the execution and delivery of the various documents by AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. (the “Servicer”) and AFS SenSub Corp. in connection therewith.  The capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Agreement.





The undersigned certifies that I am the Executive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of the Servicer.  I further certify as follows:





1. I have conducted, or caused to be conducted under my supervision, a review of the Servicer during the preceding period from January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2022, and its performance under the Agreement.





2. To the best of my knowledge, following such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period, and, to the best of my knowledge, there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.








AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.





By:/s/ Connie CoffeyDated:March 3, 2023Connie CoffeyExecutive Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
#### Davis *v.*Davis, Appellant.

Argued April 29, 1942.

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Bald-rige, Rhodes, Hirt and Kenworthey, JJ.

*154
      *William J. Graham,*with him *Clyde P. Bailey,*for appellant.

*H. A. Robinson,*of *Dickie, Robinson & McCamey,*for appellee.

July 23, 1942:

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

We have no doubt whatever that the lower court had power to terminate payments of alimony pendente lite and limit payment to respondent for costs of appeal and attorney fees upon its entering a decree granting an absolute divorce. As that is the only question before us it follows there is no merit to this appeal.

Shortly after the husband filed the libel in divorce the court ordered him to pay $125 counsel fees and expenses and alimony pendente lite in the sum of $15 per week. An additional sum of $50 for counsel fees was thereafter ordered. On March 4, 1941, the court entered an order terminating the alimony pendente lite effective as of May 14, 1940, the date the divorce was granted and directed the libellant to pay the respondent the sum of $200 for the prosecution of her appeal, and dismissed an attachment previously issued. The case came to us and we affirmed the decree of the court below. See *Davis v. Davis,*145 Pa. Superior Ct. 473, 21 A. 2d 419.

The lower court’s authority to order the termination of payments for alimony pendente lite, attorney fees, and costs, while an appeal is pending, has been expressly recognized. In *White v. White,*106 Pa. Superior Ct. 85, 161 A. 464, we stated, p. 89: “While an appeal *155ordinarily suspends the operation of the decree of the court below and such court may not in any way interfere with the jurisdiction of the appellate court, a decree for alimony pendente lite, counsel fees and expenses does not interfere with the jurisdiction of the appellate court or in any way affect the decree appealed from.” See, also, *Schofield v.*Schofield, *(No. 2),*51 Pa. Superior Ct. 579.

In *Foust v.*Foust, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 513, 516, 19 A. 2d 517, the appellant objected to the awarding of additional counsel fees and costs after an appeal had been taken to this court. We held there that an order for counsel fees is a collateral matter to the appeal in a divorce proceeding and it was within the discretion of the lower court, notwithstanding the pending of an appeal, to make such order pertaining thereto as it sees fit and proper.

The order of the court below is affirmed at appellant’s costs.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

In the Matter of: ) 

) 

ROMNEY CYCLE CENTER ) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0203 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

REC 

HEARIN DOCKET 

Respondent ) FAA Case No. 2013S0700320 

) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby notifies the United States 

Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Respondent, pursuant to 14 

C.F .R. § 13 .204(b ), that it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney 

listed below. All communications, notices, pleadings or documents are respectfully 

requested to be forwarded as follows: 

Jeanine C. Gotimer 

Senior Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Email: Jeanine. Gotimer@faa. gov 

Telephone: (718) 553-3272 

(718) 995-5699 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 

eanine C. Gotimer 

enior Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Northeast Team 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Email: Jeanine.Gotimer@faa.gov 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this _51h day of November, 2015, copies of the foregoing 

Notice of Appearance were served by US Facsimile and also placed in the United 

States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested addressed as 

follows: 

Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

US DOT/Office ofHearings M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

(FAX) 202-366-7536 

Brian E. Stolarz, Esq. 

Attorney for Respondent 

Leclair Ryan 

2318 Mill Road, Suite 1100 

Alexandria, VA 22314 

(FAX) 703-684-8075 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

Date: NOV - 5 2015 

2
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 20, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1231

Lower Tribunal No. 16-31841

________________

Guyberto R. Jean Louis,

Appellant,

vs.

Maria Obeida Carvajal and Jose A. Rodriguez Renteria,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, 

Judge.

Khullar P.A., and Divya Khullar (Tamarac), for appellant.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.