alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 10, 2008

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ JOSEPH A. CALO Joseph A. Calo Principal Financial Officer


This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of
1933.

---



QuickLinks
# Az Európai Unió C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 145 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 63. évfolyam2020. április 30. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 145

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

63. évfolyam2020. április 30.

---

| Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Tanács |
| 2020/C 145/01 | A Tanács határozata (2020. április 28.) a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság tagjainak kinevezéséről | 1 |

Tartalom

Oldal

Tanács

2020/C 145/01

A Tanács határozata (2020. április 28.) a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság tagjainak kinevezéséről

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Tanács

| 30.4.2020 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 145/1

---

A TANÁCS HATÁROZATA

(2020. április 28.)

a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság tagjainak kinevezéséről

(2020/C 145/01)

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ TANÁCSA,

tekintettel az Európai Atomenergia-közösséget létrehozó szerződésre és különösen annak 134. cikke (2) bekezdésére,

az Európai Bizottsággal folytatott konzultációt követően,

mivel:

| (1) | A Tanács 2018. november 6-i határozatával (1) kinevezte a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság (a továbbiakban: a bizottság) tagjait a 2018. november 6-tól 2023. november 6-ig tartó időszakra. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

A Tanács 2018. november 6-i határozatával (1) kinevezte a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság (a továbbiakban: a bizottság) tagjait a 2018. november 6-tól 2023. november 6-ig tartó időszakra.

| (2) | Eugenijus UŠPURAS halálát követően a bizottság egy tagjának helye megüresedett. Eugenijus UŠPURAS hivatali idejének hátralévő részére ezért új tagot kell kinevezni. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Eugenijus UŠPURAS halálát követően a bizottság egy tagjának helye megüresedett. Eugenijus UŠPURAS hivatali idejének hátralévő részére ezért új tagot kell kinevezni.

| (3) | Grzegorz WROCHNA lemondását követően a bizottság egy tagjának helye megüresedett. Grzegorz WROCHNA hivatali idejének hátralévő részére ezért új tagot kell kinevezni, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Grzegorz WROCHNA lemondását követően a bizottság egy tagjának helye megüresedett. Grzegorz WROCHNA hivatali idejének hátralévő részére ezért új tagot kell kinevezni,

ELFOGADTA EZT A HATÁROZATOT:

1. cikk

A Tanács 2023. november 6-ig Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS-t és Józef SOBOLEWSKI-t nevezi ki a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság tagjává.

2. cikk

Ez a határozat az elfogadásának napján lép hatályba.

Kelt Brüsszelben, 2020. április 28-án.

a Tanács részéről

az elnök

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  A Tanács 2018. november 6-i határozata a Tudományos és Műszaki Bizottság tagjainak kinevezéséről (HL C 403., 2018.11.9., 2. o.).

1

---
#### Harold SCHWARTZ and Rita Schwartz, his wife, Appellants, v. H. MAIMIN CO., INC., and Custom Building Corporation of Broward, Appellees.

No. 87-0003.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 20, 1988.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Ansel Simon & Cohn, Miami, for appellants.

Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., and Wayne W. Pomeroy of Pom-eroy, Pomeroy & Pomeroy, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Defendant, H. Maimin Co., Inc., and remand for further proceedings. We do this because there is existent a genuine issue of material fact which pre-eludes summary disposition. That issue is the date of the delivery of the fabric cutting machine in question, which date triggers the running and applicability of section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes (1985).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
****
 **EXHIBIT
32.2**
  CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Robert M. Blodgett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
Robert M. Blodgett
 Name:
Robert M. Blodgett
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
 Date:
March 24, 2005
Exhibit
99.9







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We
consent to the use of our report dated March 31, 2022, relating to the consolidated financial statements of A2Z Smart Technologies Corp.
included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2021..



|Tel
    Aviv, Israel | /s/
                                            Ziv Haft  
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|March
    31, 2022   | Certified
    Public Accountants (Isr.)                   
|                     | Tomer
    Fromovich, Audit Partner
    BDO
    Member Firm
Order filed, May 5, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00211-CV

____________

SERONDA GILLESPIE AND TORONDIA TALBERT, Appellant

V.

GALVESTON COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-48705

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 4, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order the Court Reporter of the 55th District Court to file the record in 

this appeal within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Zimmerer and Poissant.
AAM-11-280-E 

May 3, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10256 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0422 

Mr. Dale Schneider 

Director of Operations, Chief Pilot, and DER 

Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation 

5836 Fayetteville Road, Suite 204 

Durham, NC 27713-6692 

Dear Mr. Schneider: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 20, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation (Schneider) for an exemption to 

allow Schneider, which is operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR), to be covered under one drug testing program. The FAA finds that 

you require exemption from part 120 of 14 CFR. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Schneider. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one 

would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation an 

exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Schneider, which is operating under 

separate parts of the regulations, to be covered under one drug testing program, subject to the 

conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Schneider employees are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Schneider part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. 

Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 31

Commending Archbishop Desmond Tutu for being a recipient of the Immortal

Chaplains Prize for Humanity.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. GRAMS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Commending Archbishop Desmond Tutu for being a recipient

of the Immortal Chaplains Prize for Humanity.

Whereas the Immortal Chaplains Prize for Humanity was established by the Immortal Chaplains Foundation to

honor the memory of the four ‘‘Immortal Chaplains’’ of

World War II, Lieutenant George L. Fox, Methodist;

Lieutenant Alexander D. Goode, Jewish; Lieutenant

John P. Washington, Catholic; and Lieutenant Clark V.

Poling, Dutch Reformed;

Whereas witnesses have verified that during the approximate

18 minutes the United States Army transport Dorchester

was sinking on February 3, 1943, after being torpedoed

off the coast of Greenland, the four chaplains went from

soldier to soldier calming fears and handing out life jackets and guiding men to safety and when there were no
2

SRES 31 IS

more life jackets, they removed their own life jackets and

gave them to others to save their lives and were last seen

arm-in-arm in prayer on the hull of the ship;

Whereas many of the 230 men who survived owed their lives

to these four chaplains, and witnesses among them recounted the unique ecumenical spirit and love for their

fellow man these four demonstrated;

Whereas the Immortal Chaplains Prize for Humanity was

created to ensure that the spirit of these Chaplains is

celebrated through a living memorial to be awarded to

those who have been willing to put their lives in danger

to grant assistance to persons of a different creed or

color;

Whereas Archbishop Desmond Tutu served as Chairman of

the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, which performed a historical role and set a precedent

in revealing the truth about atrocities committed in the

past and providing the means of a peaceful resolution for

the pain suffered by that nation;

Whereas Archbishop Desmond Tutu continues to defend the

rights of the downtrodden of many nations, exhibiting

compassion to those of different races and religious beliefs; and

Whereas it is proper and desirable to recognize that Archbishop Desmond Tutu’s actions are in keeping with the

spirit of the ‘‘Immortal Chaplains’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate commends Archbishop

2 Desmond Tutu for being a recipient of the Immortal

3 Chaplains Prize for Humanity.

Æ
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 216

Designating the Month of November 1999 as ‘‘National American Indian

Heritage Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mrs.

MURRAY, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr.

AKAKA, Mr. CONRAD, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. HATCH, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr.

KOHL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. REID, Mr. ENZI, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. FRIST,

Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. KENNEDY) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the Month of November 1999 as ‘‘National

American Indian Heritage Month’’.

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives were the

original inhabitants of the land that now constitutes the

United States;

Whereas American Indian tribal governments developed the

fundamental principles of freedom of speech and separation of powers that form the foundation of the United

States Government;
2

SRES 216 IS

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have traditionally exhibited a respect for the finiteness of natural

resources through a reverence for the earth;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have served

with valor in all of America’s wars beginning with the

Revolutionary War through the conflict in the Persian

Gulf, and often the percentage of American Indians who

served exceeded significantly the percentage of American

Indians in the population of the United States as a

whole;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives have made

distinct and important contributions to the United States

and the rest of the world in many fields, including agriculture, medicine, music, language, and art;

Whereas American Indians and Alaska Natives deserve to be

recognized for their individual contributions to the United

States as local and national leaders, artists, athletes, and

scholars;

Whereas this recognition will encourage self-esteem, pride,

and self-awareness in American Indians and Alaska Natives of all ages; and

Whereas November is a time when many Americans commemorate a special time in the history of the United

States when American Indians and English settlers celebrated the bounty of their harvest and the promise of

new kinships: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates November 1999

2 as ‘‘National American Indian Heritage Month’’ and re3 quests that the President issue a proclamation calling on

4 the Federal Government and State and local governments,
3

SRES 216 IS

1 interested groups and organizations, and the people of the

2 United States to observe the month with appropriate pro3 grams, ceremonies, and activities.

Æ
Center for Regulatory Effectiveness

1601 Connecticut Avenue NW

Suite 500

Washington, DC 20009

Tel: (202) 265-2383 Fax: (202) 939-6969

contact@TheCRE.com www.TheCRE.com

April 16, 2015

The Honorable Dr. Ernest Moniz 

U.S. Secretary of Energy 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20585 

Dear Secretary Moniz:

I am writing you to express my opinion that the precedent setting work your agency is 

performing on CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) will be undermined if CCS is mandated as a 

regulatory requirement in EPA’s NSPS for coal fired plants.

I make this statement because CCS will be the focal point of subsequent litigation during which 

time CCS will be criticized and the resultant record will discourage adoption of the CCS 

technology by the regulated community notwithstanding the laudable advances that are 

underway but have not yet advanced to the stage of a universal technology.

To this end my concern is heightened when I read the comprehensive, and recently issued report, 

of the DOE FACA advisory body, the National Coal Council, in which it concluded:

“CCS does not yet meet this best system of emission reduction (BSER) standard, because it has 

not yet been adequately demonstrated.”

As I have communicated to the Administrator of EPA, the preferred method for allowing the 

Administration to proceed with its climate change program and at the same time provide an 

environment which will permit CCS to continue to evolve as a control technology is for EPA to:

 Issue an interim regulation requiring the best available control technology presently in 

existence at coal fire plants exclusive of CCS and

 Initiate the objective analysis of CCS mandated by both OMB and EPA’s peer review 

guidelines which were issued pursuant to the Data Quality Act and then modify, if 
needed, the aforementioned interim rule. One alternative to be examined in detail is the 

possibility of mandating CCS Ready in lieu of CCS.

Failure to adopt the aforementioned recommendation could result in litigation based upon a 

marriage of the Mandamus and Data Quality Acts as set forth in the attached document.

(http://thecre.com/pdf/Mandamus-DQA.pdf) A loss in court would not only set back the US 

program to control GHG emissions but would also jeopardize comparable programs throughout 

the world. Any option chosen other than that identified above should have demonstrably higher 

benefits.

As the cabinet member vested with the responsibility for ensuring an adequate and dependable 

source of energy we understand that you will continue to be involved with this matter by keeping 

the Administrator of EPA advised of your views on the availability of CCS.

Respectfully,

Jim Tozzi

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness

cc: Honorable Shaun Donovan: Director, Office of Management and Budget

Honorable Regina McCarthy: Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40927 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus LEODADIO CHAVEZ-ARAUJO, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-151-ALL

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Leodadio Chavez-Araujo (Chavez) argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. We review Chavez’s argument for plain error because he did not renew his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence. United States v. Pierre , 958 F.2d 1304, 1310 (5th Cir. 1992)(en banc).No. 01-40927 -2- Chavez was arrested at the border checkpoint in Laredo, Texas, after authorities searched his tractor-trailer and discovered approximately 1134 pounds of marijuana hidden underneath pallets of bottled water. Based on the quantity of marijuana and the manner in which it was hidden in the trailer, we find no plain error in the jury’s verdict. United States v. Paul , 142 F.3d 836, 839-40 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Delagarza-Villarreal , 141 F.3d 133, 139 (5th Cir. 1997).
AFFIRMED.
**Cummins Parameters** 65 mph 55 mph Tran

**James Calculations** W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk W braking Brk/Traction Work 2b-5 1.034 7.728 8.763 0.875 4.682 5.557 2.346 -1.080 0.461 class 6-7 1.626 7.728 9.354 1.376 4.682 6.058 3.304 -1.797 0.544 class 8 4.332 8.415 12.747 3.665 5.098 8.763 7.789 -5.100 0.655
65 mph 55 mph Tran **GEM** W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk W braking Brk/Traction Work 2b-5 1.031 7.658 8.689 0.874 4.661 5.535 2.837 -1.446 0.510 class 6-7 1.623 7.685 9.307 1.374 4.667 6.041 3.952 -2.244 0.568 class 8 4.327 8.388 12.715 3.663 5.088 8.750 8.561 -5.294 0.618
65 mph 55 mph Tran **Cummins Calculations** W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk - tireW trk - dragW trk - total W trk W braking Brk/Traction Work Class 2b-5 8.762 5.556 2.470 -0.967 0.391 Class 6-7 9.353 6.056 3.488 -1.606 0.460 Class 8 12.743 8.760 8.242 -4.555 0.553
steam

_ record - Fw: RRI Request for ICR Extension

-----Forwarded by Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 06/28/2010 03:45PM -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Smith, James R. (Randy )" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com> Date: 06/25/2010 12:22PM Subject: RRI Request for ICR Extension

Alicea, please find attached RRI co rrespondence for EPA’s consid eration to extend the deadline to complete and comply for the RRI steam -electric generat ing facilities Effluent ICR requirements.

If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Randy Smith Engineering & Technical Services 832-357-4632 (NEW) 832-357-7420 Fax From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: <steam_record@erg.com> Date: 6/28/2010 3:47 PM Sub j ect: Fw: RRI Request for ICR Extension CC: < j ordan.ronald @ epa. g ov> Attachments: RRI corporate Extension Request Letter.pd f Pa g e 1 of 1

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28C403DO

...
#### Charles TEAGUE v. SAWYER DRILLING COMPANY et al.

No. 86-C-0606.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Teague, Charles; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17617-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 306122.

Prior report: La.App., 485 So.2d 204.

Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of *Berry v. Holston Well Service,*488 So.2d 934 (La.1986).
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MIGUEL ESTRADA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00275-CR

Appeal from the

34th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20140D03119)

O R D E R

Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Access to Appellate Record is GRANTED. The Court is 

hereby providing a CD containing the clerk’s record 1 volume, and the reporter’s record 6 of 7

volumes (volume 7 of 7 is an exhibit volume and it is not included). The CD is being provided to 

the Senior Warden, of the Ellis Unit, 1697 FM 980, Huntsville, Texas, 77343, for use 

by the Appellant, Miguel Estrada, # 02017254, under the supervision of said Senior 

Warden and/or designated custodian of records. The CD does not need to be returned to the 

Court.

Further, the Court’s GRANTS, the Appellant’s Pro Se Motion for Extension of 

Time to File Pro Se Brief until July 14, 2016. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14

th day of June, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.