alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, CoreyHenry, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2021-3(the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement inall material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included inthis report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Citibank,N.A. 

 
By: 
/s/ Corey Henry
Name: Corey HenryTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)Date: March 31, 2023**
~~iooa IR EVAC LIFETrAM"I" 

January 27, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operatioris 

West Building, Ground Floor, Rrii W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE. 

Wasliington, DC 20590 

RE: Exeriiption Extensiori Request, Exerliption No. 10560A, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0364 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

Ori behalf of Air Evac EMS, Inc., holder- of Air- Carrier Certificate #EVCA731D, I would like to 

request an extensiori to exemption no. 10560A , relief fr-om the requirernents of 91.411(b) and 

91.413(c). 

The conditions arici reasons regarding public interest and safety reriiain unchanged. 

Thank you for consider-ation in this matter and questions to this r- equest need to be directed to: 

Tecfinical Publications Specialist 

Christine Garcia 

1001 Boardwalk Springs PI #250 

0'Fallon, MO 63368 

Ph: 636-695-5329 

e-rnail:christine.garcia@air-evac.com 

Sincerely, 

~A)ovw b 

Christine Garcia 

Tecfinical Publications Specialist
391 A.2d 684

#### Commonwealth v. Horton, Appellant.

Submitted April 10,1978.

Thomas P. Ruane, Jr., Public Defender, for appellant; Conrad B. Capuzzi, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The claims of ineffective assistance of counsel raised on the present appeal have been waived. *Commonwealth v. Jackson,*239 Pa.Super. 121, 362 A.2d 324 (1976). Therefore, the order of the lower court is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10(i)

                       PELICAN CENTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                            15272 BOLSA CHICA STREET
                           HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA 92649
                              (714) 895-9652 OFFICE
                            (714) 895-6321 FACSIMILE


May 26, 2005


Mr. Paul Caceres, CFO
CAM Commerce Solutions, Inc.
17075 Newhope Street, Suite A
Fountain Valley, CA 92708

RE:     LEASE EXTENSION

Dear Paul:

     John Tillotson and I appreciate your desire to extend your initial term as
a tenant of Pelican Center in Fountain Valley, CA. To document our phone
conversation, this letter confirms we have agreed to extend your lease for an
additional three years. Accordingly, the new Expiration Date, as defined in the
original lease dated December 12, 2000 (the "Lease"), will be March 6, 2010. The
rent during this additional period will continue at the same scheduled rate,
adjusted annually as provided in the Lease.

     In addition, Pelican Center Limited Partnership agrees that Section 51 of
the Lease, Option to Extend" shall remain in full force and effect, as will all
other terms of that Lease. Accordingly, should Lessee desire to exercise such
Option to Extend, notice to Lessor shall be given in writing at least six (6)
months prior to March 6, 2010.

     Please acknowledge in the space provided below and return one original to
me.

     Sincerely,

     Pelican Center Limited Partnership

     By: Pelican Center LLC, General Partner


                                           ACCEPTED AND AGREED



     By: /s/ DANIEL S. HOWSE
        ---------------------------
        Daniel S. Howse, Member

                                           /s/ PAUL CACERES
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Paul Caceres, Chief Financial Officer
                                           CAM Commerce Solutions, Inc.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 241

To direct the Senate Commission on Art to recommend to the Senate 2

outstanding individuals whose paintings shall be placed in 2 of the

remaining unfilled spaces in the Senate reception room.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Senate Commission on Art to recommend to

the Senate 2 outstanding individuals whose paintings

shall be placed in 2 of the remaining unfilled spaces

in the Senate reception room.

Whereas the reception room in the Capitol outside the Senate

Chamber was originally designed to contain medallion

likenesses of outstanding Americans;

Whereas there are at present 6 unfilled spaces in the Senate

reception room for such medallions; and

Whereas it is in the public interest to accomplish the original

objective of the design of the Senate reception room by

selecting individuals who were outstanding Senate legislators with a deep appreciation for the Senate, who will
2

•SRES 241 ATS

serve as role models for future Americans: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That (a) the Senate Commission on Art es2 tablished under section 901 of the Arizona-Idaho Con3 servation Act of 1988 (40 U.S.C. 188b) (referred to as

4 the ‘‘Commission’’) shall select 2 outstanding individuals

5 whose paintings shall be placed in 2 of the remaining un6 filled spaces in the Senate reception room, upon approval

7 by the Senate.

8 (b)(1) The Commission shall select individuals from

9 among Senators, without consideration to party affiliation,

10 who have not served as a Senator in the last 21 years.

11 The Commission shall not select a living individual.

12 (2) The Commission shall consider first those Sen13 ators who are not already commemorated in the Capitol

14 or Senate Office Buildings, although such commemoration

15 shall serve as an absolute bar to consideration or selection

16 only for those who have served as President of the Senate,

17 as the latter are visibly and appropriately commemorated

18 through the Vice Presidential bust collection.

19 (3) The Commission also shall give primary consider20 ation to the service of the Senator while in the Senate,

21 as opposed to other service to the United States.

22 (c) The Commission is authorized to seek advice and

23 recommendations from historians and other sources in

24 carrying out this resolution.
3

•SRES 241 ATS

1 SEC. 2. The Commission shall make its selections and

2 recommendations pursuant to the first section no later

3 than the close of the second session of the 106th Congress.

4 SEC. 3. For purposes of making the recommendations

5 required by this resolution, a member of the Commission

6 may designate another Senator to act in place of that

7 member.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 10, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:

                    1.                     *U.S. Immigration Investment Center, LLC, Washington, DC, and its managing director, Mahnaz Khazen,*                     Saratoga, California; to acquire voting shares of HarVest Bancorp, Inc., Gaithersburg, Maryland, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of HarVest Bank of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.                

B. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Sharon Bauman, Apple Valley, Minnesota; Virginia Bauman, Farmington, Minnesota; and Michael Murray, Irving, Texas,*                     Florence Bauman, and Russell Bauman, both of Kerkhoven, Minnesota, as individuals and members of the Bauman Family Control Group; to acquire and retain voting shares of Kerkhoven Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire and retain voting shares of Financial Security Bank, both in Kerkhoven, Minnesota.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 21, 2012.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-7210 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Group, LLC(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I, Jeffery W.Sprick, the Chief Financial Officer of Mueller Group, LLC, certify that, to thebest of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.
| Date: February 9, 2007 | By:      | /s/ JEFFERY W.  SPRICK    |
|-----------------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                        |     | Jeffery W. Sprick         |
|                        | * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 5

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas at the heart of the Oslo peace process lies the basic,

irrevocable commitment made by Palestinian Chairman

Yasir Arafat that, in his words, ‘‘all outstanding issues

relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations’’;

Whereas resolving the political status of the territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority while ensuring

Israel’s security is one of the central issues of the IsraeliPalestinian conflict;

Whereas a declaration of statehood by the Palestinians outside the framework of negotiations would, therefore, constitute a most fundamental violation of the Oslo process;

Whereas Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian leaders have repeatedly threatened to declare unilaterally the establishment of a Palestinian state;

Whereas the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state

would introduce a dramatically destabilizing element into

the Middle East, risking Israeli countermeasures, a quick

descent into violence, and an end to the entire peace

process; and

Whereas in light of continuing statements by Palestinian

leaders, United States opposition to any unilateral Pal-
2

SCON 5 ES

estinian declaration of statehood should be made clear

and unambiguous: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the final political status of the territory con4 trolled by the Palestinian Authority can only be de5 termined through negotiations and agreement be6 tween Israel and the Palestinian Authority;

7 (2) any attempt to establish Palestinian state8 hood outside the negotiating process will invoke the

9 strongest congressional opposition; and

10 (3) the President should unequivocally assert

11 United States opposition to the unilateral declara12 tion of a Palestinian State, making clear that such

13 a declaration would be a grievous violation of the

14 Oslo accords and that a declared state would not be

15 recognized by the United States.

Passed the Senate March 11, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 5

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing congressional opposition to the unilathood. position to such a unilateral declaration of state- the President to assert clearly United States op- eral declaration of a Palestinian state and urging
P. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 78 ) IV-E-7 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM

Sheet 78 of 117P. 2

Januar y 17,200 1

Summar y o f

Meetin g wit h Industr y o n Clas s I Attendees : John Bunya

k Betty Co x Te dCromwel l Da n DeRoec k Jerr y Fulma n Le e Hughe s Lyn n Hutchinso n Meliss aMcCulloug h Bil l Peterso n Lesli e Ritt s Tammy Wyle s O n th e phone : NP A

America n Petroleu mInst
. America n Chemistr y Counci l EP A Alco a Bayer/America n Chemistr y Counci l EP A EP A Sha w & Pittma m Hoga n & Hartso n (NEDA/CARP ) Georgi a- Pacifi c Henry Nichol , UAR G Norbet t Dee , NPR A Le aAnderson , OG C 

### A^Oy*>-J

EPA AI RDO C john__bunvak@nps
. [ cox@api.or g Te dcronmell@americanchemistrv
. co m deroeck.dan@epa.go v jbfulman@aol.coi n Lee.hughcs.b@baycr.co m hutchinson.lynn@epa.Ho v mcculloimh.melissafalcpa.go v bill.peterson@shwpittman.co m lsritts@HHLAW.CO M trwvles@Hapac.co m

Meetin g Summary : W e reviewe dth e approac h for involvin g th e Federa l Lan dManager s i n NS Rpermittin g action s tha t coul daffec t

Clas s I areas . W e emphasize dth e benefit s t o industr y an dth e publi c i f thes e procedure s ar e finalized
.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 50088 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Raudel Salgado**

**- Rodriguez,** 
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:20

- CR

- 303

- 2

Before **Southwick, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *
Raudel Salgado

- Rodriguez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to transport illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) and (B)(i). He contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying his request for a jury instruction on the defense of withdrawal from the

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2021 Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 21-50088 Document: 00516099691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2021No. 21

- 50088

2 conspiracy. He asserts that his recorded interview supported a finding that he withdrew before his wife transported the aliens because he told her he did not want to be involved and she transported the aliens by herself as a result. According to Salgado

- Rodriguez, the district court improperly weighed the credibility of th at evidence by describing it as self

- serving. He contends that the court was required instead to view the evidence in his favor and that the jury should h ave been allowed decide the question. The Government responds that withdrawal is not a defense to a Section 1324 conspiracy and, in the alternative, that Salgado

- Rodriguez was not factually entitled to a withdrawal instruction

. We review for abuse of discretion. See United States v. Branch , 91 F.3d 699, 711 (5th Cir. 1996).

We a gree with the Government’s alternat iv e contention that, regardless of whether the defense was available , the district court did not abuse its discretion because the evidence did not support a finding that Salgado

- Rodriguez withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was committed

. See United States v. Salazar , 751 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir. 2014). Nor did it support a finding that he completely withdr ew. See United States v. Hoffman , 901 F.3d 523, 545 (5th Cir. 2018) . Accordingly, a reasonable jury could not have found that he was entitled to the defense , and the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to issue the requested instruct ion

. See United States v. Arellano

- Banuelos , 927 F.3d 355, 364 (5th Cir. 2019)

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 21-50088 Document: 00516099691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
Exhibit 31.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)








I, Christopher C. Ericson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Golub Capital Direct Lending Corporation;





2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date:    October 19, 2023





/s/ Christopher C. Ericson


Christopher C. Ericson


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





C2
      Global
      Technologies Inc.


Toronto,
      Ontario, Canada





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on:
      Form
      S-8 Nos. (333-86761, 333-88881, 333-08483, 333-08477) of C2 Global Technologies
      Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial
      statements and the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
      10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s
      ability to continue as a going concern.







/s/
      Mintz
& Partners LLP


Toronto,
      Ontario


March
      7,
      2008
Exhibit 31.4





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION


I, C. Stephen Cordial, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Motricity, Inc.; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: January 18, 2012


/s/ C. Stephen Cordial ___________


C. Stephen Cordial


Interim Chief Financial Officer