alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 205

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States Postal Service

should issue a postage stamp commemorating Langston Hughes, a great

American literary figure.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 30, 2001

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SKELTON, Mrs. EMERSON, Mrs.

CLAYTON, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. OWENS, Mr. HILLIARD,

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, and Ms. MCKINNEY) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States

Postal Service should issue a postage stamp commemorating Langston Hughes, a great American literary figure.

Whereas Langston Hughes was born in 1902 in Joplin, Missouri;

Whereas literary critics consider Langston Hughes one of the

greatest American poets of the 20th century;

Whereas Langston Hughes’ innovative use of blues and jazz

rhythms to express his cultural heritage earned him recognition as the greatest African American poet;
2

•HCON 205 IH

Whereas in addition to poetry, Langston Hughes wrote novels, short stories, plays, opera lyrics, and books for children, and was the first African American to earn his living solely as a writer;

Whereas Langston Hughes was the central figure of the Harlem Renaissance of the 1920s, during which African

American art, music, and literature first achieved national recognition;

Whereas Langston Hughes was an inspiration and mentor for

many African American writers and continues to influence writers today;

Whereas Langston Hughes became one of the most powerful

spokesmen against racism during the 20th century by

utilizing passion and humor in his writings; and

Whereas the United States Postal Service has issued postage

stamps commemorating other great American literary figures: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should

4 issue a postage stamp commemorating Langston

5 Hughes; and

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

8 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
#### Jackie SHIELDS v. Jerry CRUMP and Aetna Life and Casualty Company.

No. 87-C-0003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Crump, Jerry; Aetna Life & Casualty Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18172-CA; Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 28316.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 479.

Denied.
2009 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-20-2009

USA v. Jones

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 07-2798

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2009 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Jones" (2009). 2009 Decisions. Paper 1348.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2009/1348
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-2798

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

PRESTON JONES

a/k/a 

Death

Preston Jones,

Appellant

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Criminal Action No. 2-03-cr-00844-023)

District Judge: Honorable Katharine S. Hayden

 

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and SMITH, Circuit Judges

 O R D E R 

The non-precedential opinion filed March 23, 2009 is hereby VACATED. The

motion by Appellee to publish the panel opinion is granted and will be filed forthwith. It

is noted that Appellant filed a petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc on May

18, 2009. As the March 23, 2009 opinion is vacated, the request for rehearing is

dismissed as moot. Should the parties wish to seek review of the precedential opinion of

the Court, the procedures to do are set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 35 and 40. 

By the Court

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro

 Circuit Judge

Dated: 20 May 2009
#### Murphy STAFFINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BQ-32.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 15, 1988.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen.; and John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant, who voluntarily chose to represent himself at trial, appeals his conviction after jury trial of inmate possession of a weapon (a pocket knife), in violation of section 944.47(l)(c). He challenges the jury selection process employed in his case. However, since he failed to object timely below to the procedure followed, the issue he raises on appeal in this regard is not reviewable. *United States v. Cole,*796 F.2d 380 (11th Cir.1986), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 443, 93 L.Ed.2d 391 (1986); *Castor v. State,*365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978). He also challenges a jury instruction on the basis of his assertion that a pocket knife does not qualify as a weapon under section 944.47(l)(a)(5). Finding to the contrary, we determine that the jury instruction given in that regard does not constitute error.

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MuellerWater Products, Inc. (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith,the Chief Operating Officer of Mueller Water Products, Inc., certify that,to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Water Products, Inc.

| Date: February 3, 2006 | By:    | /s/ DALE B. SMITH       |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                        |   | Dale B. Smith           |
|                        |   | Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Wayne Steven CHENAULT, Appellee.

No. 88-1531.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 1, 1989.

*1315Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dee R. Ball, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara C. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. The state maintains the sentencing judge erred in failing to assess points against appellee because he committed the crime while in custody serving a sentence. Rule 3.701(d)(6) in conjunction with Rule 3.988(i) says that persons who are in custody serving a sentence and who then commit another crime shall have twenty-four points scored against them, thus increasing the sentence in many cases.

The crime appellee committed was escape, so “in custody serving a sentence” is an element of the crime of escape and thus was factored into the primary offense at conviction. Without his having been in custody he would not have committed this crime of escape.

*Brown v. State,*502 So.2d 1293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) is on point and says “[t]his construction of the rule is consistent with the notion that legal constraint is an essential element of the crime of escape and thus should not be used as a ground for enhancing the sentence to be imposed.” This logic is inescapable,

AFFIRMED,

COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.
EX-10.2






EXHIBIT 10.2




BELL MICROPRODUCTS INC.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

AS OF AUGUST 3, 2005




As of August 3, 2005, the stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors of Bell
Microproducts Inc. (the “Company”) are as follows:



Stock Ownership Policy for Officers and Directors



The Board of Directors has adopted stock ownership guidelines as listed below for the
non-employee directors, the Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers of the
Company. Within five years from the appointment the director or executive officer should attain
the ownership guideline. In the case of directors and executive officers elected on or before
March 29, 2004, they should attain the ownership guideline on or before March 29, 2009:




	 	•	 	Non-employee directors – 5,000 shares






	 	•	 	Chief Executive Officer — stock having a value equal to a minimum of 1 times the annual
salary






	 	•	 	Other executive officers — stock having a value equal to a minimum of 0.5 times the
annual salary





3153818
#### Robert Alvin EDWARDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 20, 1986.

Robert Alvin Edwards, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying the defendant’s Rule 3.850 motion is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court either to conduct an evidentiary hearing on the defendant’s claim that he did not validly waive his right to be tried by a twelve person jury, or, if again denied without hearing, to attach such records in the case *173that will conclusively show that the defendant is entitled to no relief on his claim.

Reversed and remanded.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2856

_____________________________
R ENALDO D IMITRI R EEVES ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion unde r Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Renaldo Dimitri Reeves, pro se
, Petitioner

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
#### Betty HALE v. PINECREST STATE SCHOOL, et al.

No. 87-C-1272.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Hale, Betty; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA85-0887; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 132285.

Prior report: La.App., 505 So.2d 987.

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of ArriVent BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhengbin Yao, Ph.D., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
|  | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

​

Date: March 28, 2024

| ​ | ARRIVENT BIOPHARMA, INC. |
|---------|--------------------------|
| ​ | ​                  | ​ |
| ​ | By:                      | /s/ Zhengbin Yao, Ph.D. |
| ​ | Name:                    | Zhengbin Yao, Ph.D. |
| ​ | Title:                   | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |

​

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Patrick ROY.

No. 87-K-0485.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Roy, Joseph Patrick; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR86-672; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 85-CR51858.

Prior report: La.App., 502 So.2d 265.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 978 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 978

To specify that the legal public holiday known as Washington's Birthday 
                         be called by the name.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 6, 1999

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To specify that the legal public holiday known as Washington's Birthday 
                         be called by the name.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``George Washington Bicentennial Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WASHINGTON'S BIRTHDAY.

    The legal public holiday know as ``Washington's Birthday'' as 
specified in section 6103 of title 5, United States Code, shall be 
referred to by that name and no other--
            (1) by all entities and officials of the United States 
        Government; and
            (2) whenever it appears in any federally funded 
        publications.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Relator, v. F.A. ROBERTS, Jr., Defendant-Respondent.

No. K88-1088.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Nov. 17, 1988.

*1072Donald R. Wilson, Asst. Dist. Atty., Jena, for plaintiff-relator.

Patrick Durusau, Jena, for defendant-respondent.

Before GUIDRY, FORET and KING, JJ.

ORDER

WRIT DENIED: There is no clear error or clear abuse of discretion in the trial court’s ruling.

We do not read *Coy v. Iowa,*— U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 2798, 101 L.Ed.2d 857 (1988), as precluding *any*exceptions to the rights conferred by the Confrontation Clause. However, we believe that if there is to be an exception to the exercise of these fundamental rights, it must be created by a statute designed to procedurally accommodate the competing interests which are involved and only after an individualized finding is made that a witness requires special protection.

La.R.S. 15:283, which provides procedural safeguards to protect a child witness, who may have been physically or sexually abused, specifically applies only to a child under fourteen years of age. The child witness in the instant case was 17 .years of age at time of trial. Therefore, La.R.S. 15:283 has no application to the case at bar.

We do not consider that an exception to the rights conferred by the Confrontation Clause can be fashioned by a trial court based upon its general authority to control proceedings in such a fashion that justice is done.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The cooperative agreement applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the cooperative agreement applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, ZHD1 DSG-H 53 1.                    

*Date:*                         April 16-17, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel Bethesda (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         David H. Weinberg, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5b01, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-6973,                         *David.Weinberg@nih.gov*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 26, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-7830 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned, Stephen R. Theroux, is the Chief Financial Officer of New
Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
   Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

     A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
          78o(d)) and

     B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
          Report.

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.

March 27, 2003                              /s/ Stephen R. Theroux
-----------------                           ----------------------
Dated                                       Stephen R. Theroux

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by
New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Lorang, Phil

From: Long, Pam

Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 9:29 AM

To: Lorang, Phil; Sutton, Lisa; Brachtl, Megan; Coda, Tom; Wilcox, Geoffrey

Cc: Wood, Anna; Mathias, Scott; Johnson, Yvonne W

Subject: FW: Sent to OMB and OP Approved - 5623, 'SSM SIP Call - Startup, Shutdown, and 

Malfunction'

FYI. The package has been submitted to OMB but I don’t see yet that OMB has started their review clock this morning. I 

will keep checking. 

From: Adams, Darryl  

Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 3:35 PM

To: Owens, Nicole; Pritchard, Eileen

Cc: Cristofaro, Alexander; Kime, Robin; Curry, Bridgid; Rush, Alan; Dougherty, Joseph‐J; Henigin, Mary; Brown, Stephanie

N.; Stewart, Lori; Long, Pam; Balserak, Paul

Subject: Sent to OMB and OP Approved ‐ 5623, 'SSM SIP Call ‐ Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction'

Today, 7/21/2014, I uploaded to OMB OAR's 'SSM SIP Call ‐ Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction' (SAN 5623).  This

package is a Tier 3 Supplemental NPRM action.  This is an Expedited review.  ADP Tracker has been updated.  
2

Thank you,

Darryl Adams

Regulatory Management Division

Office of Policy, U.S. EPA

202 564‐6569

Mail Code 1803A, Room 3512D WJC North