UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 98-4216 NELSON HINES, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-205) Submitted: July 21, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSELBarbara Gold, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Bonnie S. Greenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________OPINION PER CURIAM: Nelson Hines was sentenced in 1993 for drug offenses and forusing or carrying a firearm in connection with a drug offense in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c) (West Supp. 1998). After the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States , 516 U.S. 137 (1995), Hines filed a motion to correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), seeking v acation of his § 924(c) conviction. The district court vacated the § 924(c) count but refused the government's request to resentence Hines on the drug counts. The government appealed and we remanded the case for resentencing. See United States v. Hines , No. 96-7465 (4th Cir. Apr. 8, 1997) (unpublished). Hines was resentenced to a term of 168 months imprisonment. The judgment and commitment order was entered on February 5, 1998. Hines filed a notice of appeal on March 9, 1998, after the ten-day appeal period had expired. He did not request an extension of time to file the notice of appeal or make a showing of excusable neglect, and the district court has not granted an extension of time to file. In criminal cases, a defendant must file his notice of appeal withinten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect. See United States v. Reyes , 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schuchardt , 685 F.2d 901, 902 (4th Cir. 1982). If a defendant files his notice of appeal outside the ten-day appeal period, but within the thirty-day extension period, the district court must make a factual finding as to whether excusable neglect warrants an extension of the ten-day period. See Reyes , 759 F.2d at 353. Here, Hines noted his appeal outside the ten-day appeal period but within the thirty-day extension period applicable upon a showing of excusable neglect. Therefore, we remand this case to the district court to allow Hines thirty days within which to request, upon a showing of excusable neglect, an extension of the appeal period. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-
2quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
REMANDED 3