alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AAM-11-280-E May 3, 2011 Exemption No. 10256 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0422

Mr. Dale Schneider Director of Operations, Chief Pilot, and DER Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation 5836 Fayetteville Road, Suite 204 Durham, NC 27713-6692

Dear Mr. Schneider:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 20, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation (Schneider) for an exemption to allow Schneider, which is operating under separate parts of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), to be covered under one drug testing program. The FAA finds that you require exemption from part 120 of 14 CFR.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Schneider.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Schneider Flight Services DBA ARC Aviation an exemption from part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Schneider, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to be covered under one drug testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Schneider employees are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Schneider part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2013 unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Frederick E. Tilton, M.D. Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
Exhibit 10.60


 


EXHIBIT B (TOM SOMMER)


 




	
  Age of Insured at the

  Time of Death

  	
   

  	
  Amount of Death Benefit, or 100%

  of the net-at-risk, whichever amount is less

  	
   

  
	
  65

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  93,150

  	
   

  
	
  66

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  91,476

  	
   

  
	
  67

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  89,393

  	
   

  
	
  68

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  86,803

  	
   

  
	
  69

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  83,541

  	
   

  
	
  70

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  79,638

  	
   

  
	
  71

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  75,016

  	
   

  
	
  72

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  69,592

  	
   

  
	
  73

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  63,271

  	
   

  
	
  74

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  55,890

  	
   

  
	
  75

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  47,460

  	
   

  
	
  76

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  37,755

  	
   

  
	
  77

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  26,730

  	
   

  
	
  78

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  14,198

  	
   

  
	
  79

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2
EXHIBIT 31.01

                      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Weiner, Chief Executive Officer of New Frontier Media, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Frontier Media, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and materially weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated: June 14, 2004





/s/   Michael Weiner
------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10.3


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 3


 


TO


 


INVERNESS
MEDICAL INNOVATIONS, INC.


 


2001
STOCK OPTION AND INCENTIVE PLAN


 


The Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc. 2001
Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended by deleting the
first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan and replacing it with the
following:


 


“The
maximum number of shares of Stock reserved and available for issuance under the
Plan shall be 6,074,081 shares, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3(b).”


 


Except as herein amended, the provisions of the Plan
shall remain in full force and effect.


 


AS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:  March 15, 2005


 


AS APPROVED BY THE STOCKHOLDERS:  May 24, 2005
Opinion issued March 7, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The



## First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 1 2

- 00 743

- C V

IN RE WYDELL DIXON & ALL ANIMALS, ALIVE, UNBORN &

DECEASED , Relator

Original Proceeding s on Petition s for Writ s of Mandamus and Prohibition

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

By petition s for writ of mandamus

, relator, Wydell Dixon , seeks relief from

the trial court’s judgment of May 29, 2012

.

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus

.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown

.

1 The underlying case is Texas City Animal Contro l v. Wydell Dixon , No. CV

- 67387 in the

County Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County, Texas, the Hon. Christopher Dupuy

, presiding.
#### STATE of Louisiana in the Interest of N.H., D.H., B.H., & S.H.

No. 86-CK-2427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Health & Human Res. Dept.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86 CA 313; Parish of Jefferson, Juvenile Court of Jefferson Parish, Div. “A”.

Prior report: La.App., 498 So.2d 91.

Denied.

CALOGERO, DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Amerisa Kornblum, Chief Financial Officer of Odimo Incorporated (the Company) in
compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, hereby certify that:



| |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.                                                      

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
May 13, 2005.

| |                         |  |  | 
| | ----------------------- |  |  | 
| |                         | 
| | /s/ Amerisa Kornblum    | 
| | Amerisa Kornblum        | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
|

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Odimo Incorporated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         39,389
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  262,299
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8,902
<INVENTORY>                                    8,602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               340,457
<PP&E>                                         2,092,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                 398,521
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,383,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          343,935
<BONDS>                                        1,565,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,386
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,165,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,383,443
<SALES>                                        752,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               752,753
<CGS>                                          428,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  428,671
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               213,346
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,590
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             43,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                68,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                   32,774
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            36,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                3,054
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   33,154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.01
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 21, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00567

- CV

One Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency and 1999 Red Chevy Tahoe

- Licence Plate

FXLI562, VIN # GNEC13R6XJ368854, Appellant

v.

The State of Texa s, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE LLY, AND SMITH

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

Having reviewed the re cord , the Court holds that One Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency

and 1999 Red Chevy Tahoe

- Licence Plate FXLI562, VIN # GNEC13R6XJ368854 has not

prosecuted its appeal and did not comply with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore,

the Court dis misses the appeal for want of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable

to pay costs, no ad

judica t i on of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 278 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 278

   Concerning the outbreak of terrorist violence in the Middle East.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 19, 2001

    Mr. Weldon of Florida (for himself and Mr. Pence) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Concerning the outbreak of terrorist violence in the Middle East.

Whereas the United States is engaged in a war against terrorists and terrorist 
        organizations involved in the attack on the World Trade Center and the 
        Pentagon that occurred on September 11, 2001, and against the 
        perpetrators of other acts of terrorism against our Nation;
Whereas the United States is fully committed to engagement and pursuing peace in 
        the Middle East;
Whereas the President has declared that he will use any and all means available 
        to bring to justice the perpetrators of these acts of terrorism and to 
        prevent future acts of terrorism against the people of the United 
        States; and
Whereas Israel has fallen victim to numerous similar unspeakable acts of 
        violence committed by terrorists against the people of Israel: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) expresses its solidarity with the people of Israel in 
        using all appropriate methods to end terrorist violence against 
        Israel;
            (2) having embarked on a similar effort to eradicate global 
        terrorism, stands in solidarity with Israel and its objectives 
        to abolish terrorism and commends Israel for its cooperation in 
        this effort;
            (3) recognizes that any resolution to the Palestinian 
        homeland question can only be resolved so long as Israel's 
        right to exist in security is fully respected;
            (4) expresses its concern that the Palestinian Authority 
        has failed to effectively curb the incitement of violence which 
        contributes to a wider acceptance of acts of terrorism against 
        innocent civilians; and
            (5) expresses concern that the Palestinian Authority has 
        failed to respond quickly and forcefully to prevent acts of 
        terrorism and to bring to justice those individuals who have 
        committed acts of terrorism.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GREG COMMANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-91-57-G, CA-97-740-1) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 28, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Greg Commander, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Commander , Nos. CR-91-57-G; CA-97-740-1 (M.D.N.C. May 26, 1998). In addition, this Court will generally not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Karpel v. Inova Health Sys. Servs. , 134 F.3d 1222, 1227 (4th Cir. 1998). We note there was sufficient evidence to sentence Appellant based upon crack cocaine. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**8.** Supplem ental Performance Measures Information (optional) :

Name (please print) Signature: Date: Name (please print) Signature: **3b.** Number of Veterans Entering Training **3.** Number of Participants Entering Training **3a.** Number of Ex-offenders Entering Training
**4.** Number of Participants Completing Training **5a.** Number of Participants Obtaining Employme nt **5b.** Number of Individuals that did not Obtain Employme nt but are Pursuing Education (e.g., GED, college courses, etc.) **6.** Average Hourly

W age of Participants Obtaining Employ me nt **7.** Funds Leveraged (total) **3c.** Number of Participants Entering Training (who are) Currently Receiving TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy

Families)

**7-1.** Funding Source Name: **7-2.** Activity

Funded: **7-1.** Funding Source Name: **7-2.** Activity

Funded: 

## United States **ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION A** **GENCY**

**Washington, DC 20460**

**PA RT III - A**  **PPROVA LS**  **1.** Cooperative Agreem ent Recipient Nam e:



### PA **RT II - PERFORMA NCE MEA** **SURES INFORMA TION**  

## JOB TRA **INING REPORTING FORM** Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average x hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate — or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden—to the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Code 2822T, W ashington, DC 20460 and to the Paperwork Reduction Project, Office of Management and Budget, Wa shington, DC 20503. DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send your completed form to the address provided by the issuing office. 

### PA **RT I - COOPERA**

**TIVE A GREEMEMENT RECIPIENT INFORMA**  **TION**
This Federal Fiscal QUARTER CUMULATIVE **2.** Cooperative Agreem ent Num ber:

**10.** U.S. EPA Regional Representative: **7-1.** Funding Source Name: **7-2.** Activity

Funded:

**9.** Cooperative Agreem ent Recipient Project Manager:
Date: Drfat For Approval: OMB No. xxxx - xxxx Expires: mm - dd - yyy
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 248

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools may display the

words ‘‘God Bless America’’ as an expression of support for the Nation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 12, 2001

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. BAKER, Mr.

BUYER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. DEMINT,

Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAVES, Mr. KERNS, Mr. LARGENT, Mrs. MYRICK,

Mr. PHELPS, Mr. PITTS, Mr. PLATTS, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. SHOWS, Mr.

TAYLOR of Mississippi, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. MANZULLO, Ms. HART, Mr.

REHBERG, Mr. OSBORNE, Mr. COBLE, Mr. GUTKNECHT, Mr. CALLAHAN,

Mr. GRUCCI, Mrs. WILSON, Mr. KELLER, Mr. ISTOOK, Mr. KOLBE, Mr.

LUCAS of Oklahoma, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. WELDON of Florida, Mr. CANNON, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. OTTER, Mr. EHLERS, Mr. REGULA, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr.

JONES of North Carolina, Mr. EHRLICH, Mr. WICKER, Mr. LATHAM,

Mrs. BONO, Mr. HILLEARY, Mr. BRYANT, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Mr.

TOOMEY, Mr. WATTS of Oklahoma, Mr. PENCE, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr.

HEFLEY, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. COMBEST,

Mr. AKIN, and Mr. DOOLITTLE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public schools

may display the words ‘‘God Bless America’’ as an expression of support for the Nation.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that pub-
2

•HCON 248 IH

1 lic schools may display the words ‘‘God Bless America’’

2 as an expression of support for the Nation.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-60865) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68583) pertaining to the Friction
Products Co. Profit Sharing Plan; S.K. Wellman Retirement Savings and Profit
Sharing Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employee's Retirement Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employee's
Savings and Investment Plan; Sinterloy Corporation 401(k) Plan; Hawk Motors,
Inc. Employees' 401(k) Plan; Hawk Corporation 401(k) Savings and Retirement
Plan; and Quarter Master Industries, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust and in
the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47220) pertaining to the Hawk
Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan of our report dated February 27, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Hawk Corporation and
subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 23, 2004