alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-118516,333-118516-01, 333-133515 and 333-133515-01) and related Prospectus of (i) Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for the registration of preferred stock, common stock, depositary shares, warrants and guarantees and (ii) Plum Creek Timberlands,L.P. for the registration of debt securities of our reports (a) dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., and (b) dated February 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P., and we also consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-67382) and related Prospectus of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for registration of common stock issuable upon exercise of Georgia Pacific Corporation-Timber Group options, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8No. 333-71192) pertaining to the Georgia-Pacific Corporation 1995 Long-term Incentive Plan and Georgia-Pacific Corporation/Timber Group 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59812) pertaining to the 2000Stock Incentive Plan of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123146) pertaining to the Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our reports datedFebruary 22, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

February 22, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 370 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 370

   To increase the authorization for expenditures relating to Senate 
   activities in connection with participation in interparliamentary 
institutions and the facilitation of foreign interchanges in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 10 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

Mr. Helms submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To increase the authorization for expenditures relating to Senate 
   activities in connection with participation in interparliamentary 
institutions and the facilitation of foreign interchanges in the United 
                    States, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AUTHORIZATION FOR EXPENDITURES RELATING TO 
              FOREIGN INTERCHANGES.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Senate Resolution 247, 
Eighty-seventh Congress, agreed to February 7, 1962 (as amended by 
section 3(c) of Senate Resolution 281, Ninety-sixth Congress, agreed to 
March 11, 1980) is amended by striking ``$25,000'' and inserting 
``$30,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the date on which this resolution is agreed to and shall 
apply to fiscal year 2000 and each fiscal year thereafter.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer of GFIGroup Inc.Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of GFI Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Gooch,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to the18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.      TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2005 |                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                         | /s/ MICHAEL GOOCH         |
|                              | Michael Gooch             |
|                         | *Chairman of the Board,*  |
|                         | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Lafayette Square Far West BDC, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Seren Tahiroglu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 25, 2022By:/s/ Seren TahirogluSeren TahirogluChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### TIMPANOGOS SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a Utah corporation, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 17709.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 31, 1982.

John C. Backlund, Provo, for plaintiff and appellant.

Robert F. Babcock, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a complaint, the gravamen of which is an attack on a sewage disposal facility contract, containing an arbitration clause, the attack being bottomed on a claim of its unconstitutionality. The attack was two-pronged assigning Article I, Sections 7 and 11 of the Utah Constitution as the weapon for its destruction.

The trial court held that the arbitration legislation claimed by plaintiff to be unconstitutional, namely U.C.A., 1953, 78-31-1 et seq., was constitutional. The court stayed execution on the dismissal until the parties, who indicated an intention to appeal, presented the sole question of constitutionality, to this Court to obtain a dispositive decision to lay the matter at rest.

At the time this case came to issue in this Court, another case involving identical constitutional and statutory questions, and that even had the identical language in the contracts, except as to parties, time, place and other terms inconsequential to the determination of the sole question as to the constitutionality of the Utah Arbitration Act, was pending and decided by this Court. The case adverted to is *Lindon City v. Engineers Construction Co.,*Utah, 636 P.2d 1070 (1981), a unanimous decision, which is dis-positive of the issue on appeal here.

The judgment is affirmed, without any award of costs because of the mutual interests of the parties in having the matter resolved.
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**Neurogen      Corporation**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

|   | 1. | I                  am the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of                  Neurogen Corporation (the "Company"). |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                  the best of my knowledge: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------|

|   | a. | The                  Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December                  31, 2006                  accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities                  and                  Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                  "Exchange Act"); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The                  information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                  the                  financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                  /s/ Stephen R. Davis              |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | ------------------------                               |
|   |                                                   |
|   | Stephen                  R. Davis                      |
|   | Executive                  Vice President and          |
|   | Chief                  Operating Officer               |
|   | Date:                  March 13,                  2007 |
#### Alvin VICE v. Gregory SANDOZ, et al.

No. 87-C-0005.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Vice, Alvin; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-1239; Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 52395-C.

Prior report: La.App., 497 So.2d 757.

Denied.
#### CONTAINER & FREIGHT DRAYAGE, INC. and Angelina Casualty Company v. Ruby SOLEY and Marie Soley and Glenn and Brenda Chauvin and Lionel Solomon.

No. 87-CC-0820.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Container & Freight Dray.; Angelina Casualty Co.; applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, mandamus, prohibition and supervisory writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, Nos. 298-222, 304-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-C-159.

Denied.
### SERVED: September 12, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF NATIONAL POWER CORPORATION 

### FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) DMS No. FAA-2013-0620

ORDERDENYING MOTION 

### 13

RespondentNational Power Corporation ("Respondent") filed under Rule 218(f) ofthe Rules ofPractice in FAA Civil PenaltyActions (14 CFR §13.218(f)) a Consolidated Motion for More Definite Statement, to Strike and Production ofDocuments ("Motion"). 1 

### Complainant Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has answered, opposing the Motion. 2 

### Complainant also submitted an Amended Complaint. Respondent's Motion is DENIED. The Amended Complaint moots any objection. It 

### provides the Respondent with adequate notice ofthe charges. The Amended Complaint is clear and detailed enoughto frame a responsive pleading. Further clarification may be obtained through the process ofdiscovery. 3

1While the Motion states that it is being filed under a different, non-applicable Rule, the Motion will be considered to have been constructively filed under the applicable Rule 218(t). 2 Complainant also moved for leave to file its answer late, citing the press ofbusiness. This motion is granted. 3 SeeDelaware Skyways, LLC, FAA OrderNo. 2005-6 (March 18, 2005), p. 9. Thatportion ofComplainant's Motion which seeks Production ofDocuments is dismissed as premature.

### 2
In accordance with Rule 218(f)(3)(i), Respondent shall file an Answerto the Complaint notlaterthan 10 days after service ofthis Order.

Attachment

- Service List

# £Wr_~ta Richard C. Goodwin Administrative LawJudge

### 3

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Kate Barber, 

### Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Great Lakes Region Federal AviationAdministration 2300 East Devon Avenue, AGL-7 Des Plaines, IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 

### ONE COPY

Martin A. Blumenthal, 

### Respondent's Counsel Attorney One Northfield Plaza, Suite 300 Northfield, IL 60093 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0620 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC---430.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 02 3

- 2 112

_____________________________
N ICHOLAS J AMES A LBRECHT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Melissa G. Olin
, Judge

. April 12, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , R AY , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Olivia M. Goodman of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee

.
[No. 18980-1-II.

Division Two.

August 9, 1996.]

#### John A. McKerricher, et al., *Appellants,*v. Marguerite E. Ogg, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Mason County, No. 90-2-00254-7, Toni A. Sheldon, J., entered January 17, 1995. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Bridgewater, J., concurred in by Houghton, A.C. J., and Armstrong, J.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 167

Commending the Georges Bank Review Panel on the recent report recommending extension of the moratorium on oil and gas exploration on

Georges Bank, commending the Government of Canada for extending

the moratorium on oil and gas exploration on Georges Bank, and urging

the Government of Canada to adopt a longer-term moratorium.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 1999

Ms. COLLINS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Commending the Georges Bank Review Panel on the recent

report recommending extension of the moratorium on

oil and gas exploration on Georges Bank, commending

the Government of Canada for extending the moratorium

on oil and gas exploration on Georges Bank, and urging

the Government of Canada to adopt a longer-term moratorium.

Whereas the unusual underwater topography and tidal activity of Georges Bank create an almost self-contained ecosystem, unique within the ocean that surrounds it;

Whereas Georges Bank is one of the most productive fisheries

in the world;
2

•SRES 167 IS

Whereas people of both Canada and the United States harvest cod, haddock, yellowtail flounder, scallops, lobsters,

swordfish, and herring from Georges Bank;

Whereas significant economic sacrifices have been made by

fishermen from both Canada and the United States to

work toward sustainable and healthy fish stocks;

Whereas hundreds of small communities in New England and

the maritime provinces of Canada depend on fish from

Georges Bank for economic support and their maritimebased way of life;

Whereas an oil spill on Georges Bank would have catastrophic effects on the Georges Bank ecosystem and the

economies of the coastal communities of New England

and the maritime provinces of Canada;

Whereas Georges Bank experiences some of the most severe

weather in the world, and the frequent storms, strong

currents, and high winds would cripple any post-spill

cleanup effort;

Whereas many scientists, fishermen, and other persons concerned with and knowledgeable about the unique ecosystem of Georges Bank have urged the Government of

Canada to extend the moratorium on oil and gas activity;

Whereas the Georges Bank Review Panel issued a report recommending an extension of the moratorium on oil and

gas activity; and

Whereas the Government of the United States has established a moratorium on oil and gas activity in Georges

Bank until the year 2012: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—
3

•SRES 167 IS

1 (1) commends the Georges Bank Review Panel

2 on the recent report recommending extension of the

3 moratorium on oil and gas exploration on Georges

4 Bank;

5 (2) commends the Government of Canada for

6 extending the moratorium on oil and gas activity on

7 Georges Bank through 1999; and

8 (3) urges the Government of Canada to extend

9 the moratorium until the year 2012.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher R. Huber, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of NightHawk Radiology Holdings, Inc.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  |                                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    CHRISTOPHER R. HUBER
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Name:                       |  | Christopher R. Huber                                    
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Title:                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Operations
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                             |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
| 1. | I      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Symmetry Medical      Inc. (the “registrant”); |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/      Fred L. Hite        |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Fred      L. Hite            |
|   |   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
391 A.2d 691

#### Commonwealth v. Matthews, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

Timothy A. Crawford, Jr., for appellant; No appearance entered nor brief submitted for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

*See, Commonwealth v. Blair,*460 Pa. 31, 33, n. 1, 331 A.2d 213, 214, n. 1 (1975).
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 125

Recognizing the founding of the Alliance for Reform and Democracy in

Asia, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. DREIER (for himself and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the founding of the Alliance for Reform and

Democracy in Asia, and for other purposes.

Whereas authoritarian governments in Asia deny people basic

freedoms of belief, speech, and association and engage in

intimidation and other human rights abuses to ensure

that any political opposition is nonexistent or weak;

Whereas established and emerging democracies in Asia offer

hope and inspiration to democrats and reformers across

the region;

Whereas democracy activists in Asia are firmly committed to

advancing democracy, human rights, good governance,

and the rule of law, often at great personal risk;

Whereas leading democrats and reformers recently created

the Alliance for Reform and Democracy in Asia (ARDA)
2

•HCON 125 IH

during a meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, as a broadbased, nonviolent movement to encourage and accelerate

the march of democracy in the region;

Whereas the members of ARDA have rejected as false any

definition of so-called ‘‘Asian values’’ that does not include respect for human rights, democracy, freedom, and

good governance;

Whereas the members of the ARDA have pledged in a declaration of unity to promote democracy, human rights,

and the rule of law in Asia and to support one another

in times of political crisis;

Whereas the members of ARDA have repeatedly met (most

recently in Mongolia and Taiwan) to reaffirm their collective commitment to democracy and human rights in Asia;

and

Whereas the Congress has recognized that the establishment

of democratic governments in Asia is vital to United

States national security interests: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes and commends the members of

4 the Alliance for Reform and Democracy in Asia

5 (ARDA) for joining forces in their common struggle

6 for freedom and the rule of law;

7 (2) calls upon Asian governments to heed

8 ARDA’s calls for political and legal reforms and to

9 engage ARDA members in dialog; and
3

•HCON 125 IH

1 (3) calls for an immediate end to human rights

2 violations committed against Asian democracy activ3 ists and reformers.

Æ