alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of XL Generation International Inc. (the
      “Registrant”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, Michel St-Pierre, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Registrant.











Date:
      September 13, 2006


By: /s/
      Michel St-Pierre


Name:
      Michel St-Pierre


Title:
      Acting Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

**MICHAEL LEVANT JOHNSON, Appellant** 

**v.**

**CHERYL KINNEY AND CHESTER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS,**  **Appellees :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 148 MAP 2014**  **Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court at No. 470 MD 2014**  **dated 10/27/14 and exited on 10/28/14**

ORDER

PER CURIAM: DECIDED: June 15, 2015

AND NOW **, this 15 th**  **day of June, 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth Co urt is** 

AFFIRMED

**.**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MuellerGroup, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer ofMueller Group, LLC, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.
| Date: August 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ DALE B. SMITH          |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                      |   | Dale B. Smith              |
|                      |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 231

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the two Houses of Congress assemble

3 in the Hall of the House of Representatives on Thursday,

4 September 20, 2001, at 9 p.m., for the purpose of receiv-
2

•HCON 231 EH

1 ing such communication as the President of the United

2 States shall be pleased to make to them.

Passed the House of Representatives September 19,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 231

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a joint session of Congress to receive

a message from the President.
'Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4194 I 651-296-6300 

800-65 7 ·J864 I 65 1-l!l 2·5332 ffY I www pea >tate.mn.us i Equal Opporcunit'i Ernp!oye r 

June 14, 2012 

Ms. Tinka G. Hyde, Director 

Water Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard (W-15J) 

Chicago, Illinois 60604-3507 

Dear Ms. Hyde: 

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requests a time extension to August 31, 2012, for submittal 

of Minnesota's 401 Certification for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed 2013 

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit for Commercial and large 

Recreational Vessels (VGP2) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) . 

With USEPA's assistance, MPCA staff has been working diligently with other Great lakes states to complete a 

401 Certification by July 2, 2012, as requested in your letter dated December 16, 2011. Minnesota's draft 401 

certification was open for public comment from May 7 to May 28, 2012. We received multiple comment 

letters raising complex legal and technical issues from both environmental groups and industry 

representatives. In addition, the MPCA Commissioner has determined that the 401 certification approval will 

be made by the MPCA's Citizen's Board (Boa'rdi, which only meets once a month. After initial review of this 

significant volume of material; it is clear that more time is needed to develop comment responses, work with 

interested parties to resolve issues, and present a protective and workable 401 certification for the Board's 

approval. Significant comments include: 

-Applicability of Ballast Water Exchange (BWE) requirements for vessels operating within the 

Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ); 

- biological (including invasive species) monitoring requirements for ballast water discharges; 

-applicability of Minnesota's nondegradation standard; and 

-the need to coordinate with Wisconsin on requirements affecting shared waters (note that Wisconsin 

Department of Natural Resources is processing a contested case hearing request). 

The MPCA requests the time extension until August 31, 2012, to finalize its 401 certification and receive 

Board approval to submit the certification to EPA. The vessel permits are of particular interest to MPCA and 

Minnesota due to the vulnerability of lake Superior and other state waters to water quality degradation 

related to ballast water discharges containing aquatic invasive species. As you are aware, our ports receive 

more ballast water than any other ports in the Great lakes. 

Your prompt attention to this request is appreciated. Please call David Richfield (651-757-2668) of my staff 

with any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Michelle Beeman 

Deputy Commissioner 

MB/JS:slm
EXHIBIT 32.2
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thomas P. Russo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the
best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2006 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.

          By:                          /s/ Thomas P. Russo


                                        Thomas P. Russo
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                       METAMORPHIX, INC.

Date:  October 3, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000848463
<NAME>                        ENEX OIL & GAS INCOME PROGRAM IV - SERIES 2, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1630
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16006
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               18165
<PP&E>                                         2538167
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2342640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213692
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          76126
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     137566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213692
<SALES>                                        140712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140712
<CGS>                                          178807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  214255
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               35448
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (73543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Gregory SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 82CA0567.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Nov. 26, 1982.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 6, 1983.

Certiorari Denied March 28, 1983.

Larry Galka, Colorado Springs, for plaintiff-appellant.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Charles Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel Cantrick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Larry A. Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

The district court affirmed the revocation of the driver’s license of Gregory Smith. The plaintiff had been previously convicted of operating a vehicle while under the influence of, or impaired by, alcohol. In the instant case, plaintiff refused to submit to an alcohol determination test. Based upon the plaintiff’s driving record and this refusal, the Department of Revenue revoked his driver’s license. Now plaintiff appeals and we affirm.

Relative to plaintiff’s refusal to submit to an alcohol determination test, the facts, as *1193determined by the Department of Revenue from ample evidence of record, are that the plaintiff was observed driving in an erratic manner and was stopped by a police officer. At the scene, it was noticed that plaintiff had an alcoholic odor on his breath, and therefore, he was given extensive coordination tests, the results of which were consistent with intoxication.

He was then advised he was under arrest for driving under the influence or impaired by alcohol, and he was handed a legible copy of the advisement form which was read aloud to him. Plaintiff stated that he understood the form and had no questions; upon being requested to submit to either a blood alcohol, a breath, or a urine test, he refused all three tests.

Plaintiff maintains he was taken to the hospital for a blood test which the police officer advised him not to take, and at that time and later at the police station, he was not given the option of taking the other two tests. There is conflicting evidence in the record that the hospital incident took place. The hearing officer found, however, that plaintiff was advised of his rights under the implied consent law, that chemical tests were requested, and that they were refused.

On the basis of the factual determinations made by the Department, the legal determination resulting in the revocation of plaintiff’s license was correct. *Dolan v. Rust,*195 Colo. 173, 576 P.2d 560 (1978).

Review of this record leads us to conclude that this appeal is groundless, frivolous, and filed purely for delay. Therefore, under the authority of C.A.R. 38, we order plaintiff to pay the sum of $500 to the Department of Revenue as damages.

The judgment is affirmed.

COYTE and KELLY, JJ., concur.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0558

SAT Date: 12/21/2012

Print Date: 8/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1-3 1-3 1

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; NEURO; IRR; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:
 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0557-58

FATE: Estimations for Liquid with MP = -153.7 C (M for low weight)log Kow = 3.21 (E) S = <0.001 to 1.8 mg/L at 25 C (E for component range), 14 mg/L at 25°C (M for low weight)VP = <1.0E-6 to 168 torr at 25 C (NOMO5 for component range), 211 torr (M for low weight)

BP = 66-510 C (M for mixture), 60 °C (M for low weight)H = 1.71 (E)log Koc = 2.04 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.79 (E)log Fish BAF = 2.03 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0-99 via sorption and strippingTime for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = da->moSorption to soils/sediments = moderate - v.strongVolatilization half-life from a standard river = 1 hrsVolatilization half-life from a standard lake = 4 daAtmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 24 hr via OH radicalPBT Potential: P1-3B1-3*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the lower molecular weight components is expected to be g

Concern for solvent neurotoxicity and irritation and for chemical pneumonia.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured C

fish 96-h LC50 25

daphnid 48-h LC50 15

green algal 96-h EC50 14

fish 

_

chronic value 2.6
daphnid _ chronic value 1.7

algal _ chronic value 4.0

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical clas

(representative structure); log Kow = 2.54 (EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S ≤ 0.53 g/L at 25 C (P); 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as C<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern (ppb) 170

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class hydrocarbon

Ecotox Category Neutral Organics

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
J. Kimo Esplin, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of HMP Equity Holdings Corporation for the three months ended
June 30, 2004;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
December 8, 2004

| |  |  | /s/J. KIMO ESPLINJ. Kimo Esplin Chief Financial Officer
| |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
```

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 14, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13707-13708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-04999]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at the Scholes International Airport, Galveston, Texas

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invite public comment on the 
release of land at the Scholes International Airport under the 
provisions of Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment 
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Ben Guttery, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Texas 
Airports District Office, ASW-650, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, 
Texas 76177.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Mike Shahan, Airport Director, at the 
following address: 2115 Terminal Drive #4, Galveston, Texas 77554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Mr. Anthony Mekhail, Program Manager, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Texas Airports District Office, ASW-
650, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177, Telephone: (817) 
222-5663, email: Anthony.Mekhail@faa.gov.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this 
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Scholes International Airport under 
the provisions of the AIR 21. The following is a brief overview of the 
request:
    City of Galveston requests the release of 5.5 acres of non-
aeronautical airport property. The property is located on the west side 
of the airport, along Travel Air Road. The property to be released will 
be sold and revenues shall be used to build airport-owned hangars whose 
lease revenue will support maintenance and improvement of the airport. 
Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office listed 
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application, 
notice

[[Page 13708]]

and other documents relevant to the application in person at the 
Scholes International Airport, telephone number (409) 797-3593.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 5, 2017.
Ignacio Flores,
Director, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-04999 Filed 3-13-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
(a)  A
        review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 14, 2021, as amended (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller,
        Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2021-B Owner Trust, as issuer, during the year ended December 31, 2023 has been made under my supervision.
  (b)  To


        the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.
    /s/ James Schofield
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff, v. Epifano M. SANCHEZ, Defendant.

No. 82CA0132.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

March 25, 1982.

*96STERNBERG, Judge.

This is a non-adversary review under C.A.R. 4(d)(3) and (4), pursuant to § 18-1-409.5, C.R.S.1973 (1980 Cum.Supp.). The defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to the offense of manslaughter, § 18-3-104, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), a class 4 felony and third degree assault, § 18-3-204, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8), a class 1 misdemeanor.

The trial court imposed a sentence of six years’ incarceration on the manslaughter charge and a concurrent sentence of two years on the assault charge, plus one year of parole. The sentence as to the manslaughter charge exceeds the presumptive range of two to four years plus one year of parole established by § 18-1-105(l)(a), C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.).

This case must be remanded to the trial court to comply with the dictates of 1979 Colo.Sess.Laws, ch. 157, § 18-1-105(7), p. 670. It is provided there that when a court imposes a sentence not within the presumptive range it “shall make specific written findings on the record of the case, detailing the specific extraordinary circumstances which constitute the reasons for varying from the presumptive sentence .... ” *People v. Abila,*Colo.App., 606 P.2d 81 (1980).

The requirement for written findings has been deleted, 1981 Colo.Sess.Laws, ch. 210, p. 969, however, by § 3 of that act the deletion takes effect July 1,1981, “and shall apply to all sentences imposed for the conviction of a felony committed on or after said date.” Because the felony in this case was committed before July 1, 1981, the requirement for written findings survives.

Consequently, we remand to the trial court with directions that it enter specific written findings indicating *the specific extraordinary circumstances*leading to the sentence beyond the presumptive range in compliance with the legislative requirement. The circumstances must be “extraordinarily aggravated” as distinguished from merely “aggravated” to warrant a sentence beyond the presumptive range. *Compare*§ 18-1-105(6), C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.) *with*§ 18-l-105(l)(b), C.R.S. 1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.). Thereafter, the record shall be recertified to this court. *See People v. Abila, supra.*

The cause is remanded with directions.

PIERCE and BERMAN, JJ., concur.