alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 312

To authorize testimony, document production, and legal representation in

State of Indiana v. Amy Han.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony, document production, and legal

representation in State of Indiana v. Amy Han.

Whereas, in the case of State of Indiana v. Amy Han, C. No.

99–148243, pending in the Indiana Superior Court of

Marion County, Criminal Division, testimony has been requested from Lesley Reser and Lane Ralph, employees in

the office of Senator Richard Lugar;

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(2) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(2), the Senate may direct its counsel to represent employees of the Senate with respect to any subpoena, order, or request for testimony relating to their

official responsibilities;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evi-
2

SRES 312 ATS

dence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be

taken from such control or possession but by permission

of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Lesley Reser and Lane Ralph, and

2 any other employee of Senator Lugar’s office from whom

3 testimony may be required, are authorized to testify and

4 produce documents in the case of State of Indiana v. Amy

5 Han, except concerning matters for which a privilege

6 should be asserted.

7 SEC. 2. The Senate Legal Counsel is authorized to

8 represent Lesley Reser, Lane Ralph, and any other em9 ployee of Senator Lugar’s office in connection with the

10 testimony and document production authorized in section

11 one of this resolution.

Æ
Sanitized IH 

Monitoring 

Report for 

Substance 

Elements
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6994

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MELISSA MENDORA HARLESS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Abingdon

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00001

- JPJ

- PMS

- 13 )

Submitted : April 30, 2021 Decided: June 7, 2021

Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Melissa Mendora Harless, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Suzanne Kerney

- Quillen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Melissa Mendora Harless appeals the district court’s order denying without prejudice her “Motion Requesting Modification of Sentence Pursuant to Compelling
Circumstances.” ∗ We have reviewed the record and fi nd no reversible error. First, the district court correctly concluded that it lacked authority to order Harless’ release to home confinement, insofar as she sought relief under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, Pub. L. No. 116

- 136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516 (2020) (“CARES Act”). See United States v. Saunders , 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 2021). Second , to the extent Harless fairly challenges the issue on appeal, see Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007), we conclude t hat the district court acted within its discretion in declining to construe Harless’ motion as a request for compassionate release under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391 (“First Step Act”), and in denying Harless’ motion without prejudice to her ability to bring a compassionate release motion supported by additional, necessary information

. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326,
329

- 30 (4th Cir. 2021) (describing standard of review and requirements for establishing eligibility for compass ionate release). Although Harless attempts to provide such supplemental information on appeal, we decline to consider those new materials. S ee Fed. R. App. P. 10(a); In re Under Seal , 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014) . Instead, Harless’

∗ We conclude that the district court’s denial of Harless’ motion without prejudice does not deprive us of jurisdiction over this appeal

. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610

- 12 (4th Cir. 2020) , cert. denied , 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021)

.3 new arguments and evidence in support of compassionate release should be considered, if at all, by the district court in the first instance. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny as moot Harless’ motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.35 MB)
 
 social media CSAF AF Air Force USAF AFWN CMSAF Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein Chief Master Sgt. of the Air Force Kaleth O. Wright Reddit Ask Me Anything EPR enlisted performance review Incirlik AB
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANDREA GUNTER, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1592

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed February 1, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; James A. Yancey, Judge, and 

J. Dale Durrance, Senior Judge.

Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, 

Second District, and Joseph Thye 

Sexton, Assistant Regional Counsel, 

Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, for Appellant. 

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Katie Lynn Salemi, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
#### Omar De Jesus GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-582.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 20, 1986.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gelber, Glass & Durant and N. Joseph Durant, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the overwhelming evidence of Gonzalez’s guilt, we find that the error, if any, was harmless. *State v. Marshall,*476 So.2d 150 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed.
[No. 33320-8-I.

Division One.

June 24, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Brian S. Ridley, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Sno-homish County, No. 92-1-01229-9, Gerald L. Knight, J., entered August 24, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Webster, J., concurred in by Becker and Ellington, JJ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 186

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a Parents

Week to recognize and support parents who actively participate in the

lives of their children.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 2001

Ms. KAPTUR submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the establishment of a Parents Week to recognize and support parents who actively participate in the lives of their children.

Whereas parents play a vital role in society by raising their

children to be responsible adults;

Whereas parents who actively participate in the lives of their

children deserve recognition and support;

Whereas the establishment of a Parents Week would encourage parents to actively participate in the lives of their

children; and

Whereas the fourth week of September is an appropriate

week to establish as Parents Week: Now, therefore, be it
2

•HCON 186 IH

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) a Parents Week should be established to

4 recognize and support parents who actively partici5 pate in the lives of their children; and

6 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

7 calling on the people of the United States to observe

8 such a week with appropriate programs and activi9 ties.

Æ
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2007


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 279 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 279

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 20 (legislative day, December 18), 2001

        Received and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing and commending the excellent service of members of the 
     Armed Forces who are prosecuting the war to end terrorism and 
                 protecting the security of the Nation.

    Whereas among the first military units to make this transition to 
            wartime operations was the USS Enterprise Battle Group, 
            which, on September 11, 2001, while en route back to the 
            United States from a scheduled peacetime deployment, was 
            immediately redeployed to conduct operations against 
            terrorists;
    Whereas elements of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps 
            began deploying to the theater of war to secure bases and 
            support combat operations as early as September 19, 2001; 
            and
    Whereas since then, not only have the special operations and 
            conventional forces of all the services performed 
            magnificently, but the members of the Armed Forces have 
            repeatedly demonstrated an extraordinary level of 
            commitment and professionalism: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes and commends the excellent service of all 
in the Armed Forces who are prosecuting the war to end terrorism and 
protecting the security of the Nation.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 20, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0344.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:47PM ----- To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Don DiCristofaro" <don@blueskyenviro.com> Date: 01/14/2010 05:03PM cc: "'Ken Schisler'" <kschisler@enernoc.com>, "'Rick Counihan'" <RCounihan@enernoc.com> Subject: Evidence Why a 15 Hour Emergency DR Limit Will Not Work Melanie,

You asked me to provide something concrete that shows why a 15 hour annual limit for engines operating in emergency DR programs will not work. In the attached document are relevant pages from the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement (RAA). This document is incorporated by reference as part of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved tariff for PJM Interconnection. This RAA is the document that establishes the rules and legally binds owners of electrical system infrastructure to maintain the reliability of the bulk power system in PJM.

The attached pages describe the rules for Demand Response:

Rule A2 establishes the 10 dispatch requirement. Rule A6 establishes that dispatches may occur only in emergency situations. Rule A7 establishes the 6 hour event duration.

Rules A2 and A7 together make up the 60 hour maximum dispatch: 10 events x 6 hours each. These requirements are on the asset level. In other words, PJM expects not only that EnerNOC's overall portfolio be able to respond to 10 events x 6 hours each, but that every ASSET be able to do so. As such, we can’t cobble together resources to meet this expectation. Please keep in mind that this is an upper limit for PJM that is unlikely to ever be reached. In the past seven years, the PJM ELRP has only been called a combined TOTAL of 20 hours in the eastern portion of PJM. The ELRP has never been called in the western portion of PJM. The ERCOT EILS has never been called. OP 4 Action 12 has only been called once in all of New England. Ken and I are available tomorrow morning if you or Peter have any questions about the attached. Don Don DiCristofaro, CCM Blue Sky Environmental LLC | 1040 Great Plain Avenue; 3rd Floor | Needham, MA 02492 m: 617-834-8408 | f: 857-221-9464 don@blueskyenviro.com

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0344.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
**Exhibit 32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Francis T. Joyce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Francis
              T. JoyceFrancis
              T. JoyceChief
              Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2007




A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Quarterly
Report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Limpert,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
            February
      11, 2010
            
            By:
            /s/
      Andrew LimpertAndrew
      LimpertChief
      Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**Section 1350CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Symmetry MedicalInc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended April 1, 2006 (the “Form 10-Q”) of theCorporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Corporation.

May 10,2006

|        | /s/ BRIAN MOORE         |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Brian Moore             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

|        | /s/ FRED HITE           |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Fred Hite               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 149 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.149
                                          Agreed to June 6, 2001        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on June 7, 
2001, for a ceremony to present posthumously a gold medal on behalf of 
Congress to Charles M. Schulz. Physical preparations for the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the quarterly report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zhongyi Liu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  August 13, 2010/s/ Zhongyi LiuZhongyi Liu, CEO and President,
principal executive officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.