alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Or-f'1-~j0.0 33Y635 

aU P0 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

March 31, 2011 

iF. 11 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 6428 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 00 

Washington, DC 20460 0 

12e : EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

December 2010 Sample Data 

Dear Document Control Office : 

0 

cn 

co 

-- 

As per Part IV, Section G.5 .a of the NJPDES permit, we are submitting a summary of PFOA 

analytical results for the weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A to NJDEP on a 

monthly basis. Per your request, we are sending you a paper and electronic copy of the report for 

samples taken during December 2010 . We will continue to send you the reports each month. 

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (856) 540-3015 . 

Sincerely, 

Joe Greenfield 

SHE Consultant - Environmental 

DuPont Chambers Works 

Enclosures 

CONTAINS N® CE?'', 
Copies to : 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room 4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Point Source Permitting - Region 2 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box 029 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0029
#### Christopher Lynn PORTER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 80954.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Dec. 23, 1993.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Crim. Appeals and Charlie McCoy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review *Porter v. State,*609 So.2d 640 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), in which the district court of appeal certified the same question we recently answered in the negative in *Seabrook v. State,*629 So.2d 129 (Fla.1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in *Seabrook,*we once again answer the question in the negative and approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
#### Jay ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Robert OGBURN, Chief Judge for the 12th Judicial District in and for the State of Colorado, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 82SA87.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 14, 1982.

Jay Ross, pro se.

Robert Ogburn not appearing.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Jay Ross, has appealed the order of Chief Judge Robert Ogburn, which denied petitions to convene a grand jury to investigate criminal activity in the Alamosa area. A serious question exists as to whether this ease is properly before us on appeal. We elect not to address the many procedural issues which appear in the record and, therefore, we review the merits.

Affidavits and other documents were presented to the district court together with a petition requesting that a grand jury be called pursuant to the provisions of section 13-72-101, C.R.S. 1973, or in accordance with section 13-73-101, C.R.S. 1973.

The district court has authority to call a grand jury in its discretion pursuant to the provisions of section 13-72-101(3), which provides:

> “In all other counties the grand jury shall be called and sit at such times and *391for such periods as the court may order on its own motion or upon motion by the district attorney of the judicial district in which the county is located.”

In considering the affidavits and materials presented by the appellant, the chief judge concluded that the showing made by the appellant was insufficient to cause him to call a grand jury on his own motion, and that the appellant failed to establish that section 13-73-101, C.R.S. 1973, supported the request that a state-wide grand jury be impaneled.

From the record before us, we conclude that the appellant has failed to demonstrate the need for a grand jury and that the Chief Judge of the Twelfth Judicial District did not abuse his discretion in denying the appellant’s petitions.

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 174 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.Con.Res.174
                                         Agreed to July 11, 2001        

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on July 26, 
2001, for a ceremony to present Congressional Gold Medals to the 
original 29 Navajo Code Talkers. Physical preparations for the ceremony 
shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.
  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.
```
#### Edward F. ADDISS, Appellant, v. J. Leonard REINSCH and Frank Stanton, Appellees.

No. 4-86-0618.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1986.

Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Paul R. Lipton, P.A., North Miami Beach, and Law Offices of Ronald Sales, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

John R. Young of James & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Under the circumstances of this case, no abuse of discretion has been demonstrated. Therefore, the order of the trial court denying appellant’s application for temporary injunction without prejudice to appellant’s right to set the matter for an evidentiary hearing is affirmed.

DOWNEY, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

21–995 2017

S. HRG. 114–505 

[ERRATA] 

S. 3018, THE SECURING ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE 

ACT, AND TO EXAMINE PROTECTIONS 

DESIGNED TO GUARD AGAINST ENERGY 

DISRUPTIONS 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE 

SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS, 

FORESTS, AND MINING 

OF THE 

COMMITTEE ON 

ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

JULY 12, 2016 

( 

Printed for the use of the 

Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://fdsys.gov 

[ERRATA] 

An error was made on the cover. The wrong Subcommittee was 

printed. The Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining 

was printed instead of the Subcommittee on Energy.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L., 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Biological Sciences Advisory Committee (#1110).                    

*Date and Time:*                         April 26, 2011; 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         This meeting will be held by teleconference at the National Science Foundation, 1401 Wilson Blvd., Room 688, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

                        All visitors must contact the Directorate of Biological Sciences [call 703-292-8400 or send an email message to                         *erchiang@nsf.gov*] at least 24 hours prior to the teleconference to arrange for a visitor's badge. All visitors must report to the NSF visitor desk located in the lobby at the 9th and N. Stuart Streets entrance on the day of the teleconference to receive a visitor's badge.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Charles Liarakos, National Science Foundation, Room 605, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230 Tel No.: (703) 292-8400.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         The Advisory Committee for the Directorate for Biological Sciences provides advice, recommendations, and oversight concerning major program emphases, directions, and goals for the research-related activities of the divisions that make up of the Directorate for Biological Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*                         Items on the agenda include a briefing of the BIO FY13 budget request, and discussions on data management and broadening participation issues in biological sciences.                    

 Dated: March 27, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-7761 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on April 12, 2012 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Washington State Parks office, 270 9th Street NE., East Wenatchee, WA. During this meeting information will be shared about the Forest Service Chief's 10-Year Stewardship Challenge, Upper Yakima Basin Water Enhancement Project, Holden Mine Remediation progress, and an update on the Forest Plan Revision. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Direct questions regarding this meeting to Clint Kyhl, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, phone 509-664-9200.

 Dated:  March 21, 2012.

Clinton Kyhl,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2012-7368 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### Willie J. PRUITT v. STATE.

3 Div. 684.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 9, 1987.

*259Everette A. Price, Jr., Brewton, for appellant.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and P. David Bjurberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

TAYLOR, Judge.

Willie J. Pruitt’s petition for writ of habeas corpus was dismissed by the circuit court because it was not verified under oath as required. Section 15-21-4, Code of Alabama 1975, provides:

> “Application for a writ of habeas corpus must be made by petition, signed either by the party himself for whose benefit it is intended or by some other person on his behalf, *must be verified by oath of the applicant*to the effect that the statements therein contained are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief and must state, in substance, the name of the person on whose behalf the application is made, that he is imprisoned or restrained of his liberty in the county, the place of such imprisonment, if known, the name of the officer or person by whom he is so imprisoned and the cause or pretense of such imprisonment; and, if the imprisonment is by virtue of any warrant, writ or other process, a copy thereof must be annexed to the petition or the petition must allege that a copy thereof has been demanded and refused or must show some sufficient excuse for the failure to demand a copy.” (emphasis ours)

Substantial compliance has been held to be sufficient. *Ex parte Corbitt,*468 So.2d 92 (Ala.1985); *Rice v. State,*460 So.2d 254 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). The failure to verify a petition for writ of habeas corpus is not a “nicety of pleading” that can be disregarded. Without such a verification there is no evidence before the circuit court. *Mead v. State,*449 So.2d 1279 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). The following language was held to be insufficient in *O’Such v. State,*423 So.2d 317 (Ala.Cr.App.1982): “I Thomas C. O’Such, hereby declare under penalty of perjury by my signature below....” See also, *Barker v. State,*437 So.2d 1375 (Ala. Cr.App.1983). The plain language of the law is that habeas corpus petitions must be verified under oath. This dismissal is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
Exhibit
32.1




**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
connection with the Annual Report of LifeCell Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Paul G. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and Steven T. Sobieski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.





Dated:
March 10, 2005




/s/
      Paul G. ThomasPaul
      G. ThomasChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Steven T. SobieskiSteven
      T. SobieskiChief
      Executive Officer








The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K
or as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
LifeCell Corporation and will be retained by LifeCell Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holdings LLC(‘‘Nalco’’) and Bradley J. Bell, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunctionwith the filing of Nalco’s 10-Q financial report (the‘‘Report’’) with the Securities andExchange Commission, covering the calendar quarter ending June30,  2006, hereby certify asfollows:

|  |          |                                                                                           |
|--|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | a.  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                    |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | b.  | The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations forNalco. |

|        |  |  |                                                                                                               |
|--------|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/ WILLIAM H. JOYCE                                                                                          |
|   |  |  | William H. JoyceChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer Date:    August  9,  2006             |
|   |  |  | /s/BRADLEY J. BELL                                                                                            |
|   |  |  | Bradley J. BellExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:    August9,  2006 |
|        |

----
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

William H. Joyce, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of Nalco Holdings LLC("Nalco") and Bradley J. Bell, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of Nalco, in conjunction with thefiling of Nalco's 10-Q financial report (the"Report") with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, covering the calendar quarter ending June 30, 2005, herebycertify as follows:

|          |                                                                                           |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| a.  | The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |

|          |                                                                                                                                     |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| b.  | The information in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations for Nalco. |

|  | /s/ WILLIAM H.JOYCE                                 WilliamH. Joyce Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 12,2005 |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | /s/ BRADLEY J.BELL                                   Bradley J. Bell Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer Date: August 12, 2005 |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

12 th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20006 TEL : 202 659 6600

FAX : 202 659 6699

Evelyn D. Sahr

202 659 6622

esahr@eckertseamans.com

May 29, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

United S tates Department of Transportation

Room W86

- 316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation for

Exemption Authority (US

- Ecuador ), D ocket D OT

- OST

- 2015

- 0103

Dear Mr. Gretch,

Ple ase be advised we have polled and received non

- objections from each of the U.S. carriers on

the attached service list for the above

- referenced application of JetBlue Airways Corporation

(JetBlue). JetBlue respectfully requests the Department take prompt action on its application so

that marketing of its U.S.

- Ecuador service can begin as soon as possible and well ahead of

JetBlue’s anticipate d start date of February 2 5, 2016

.

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

Sincerel y,

____________ Evelyn D. Sahr

Drew M. Derco

Counsel for JetBlue Airways CorporationService List

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

abigail.don ovan@aa.com American Airlines

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com Delta Air Lines

gmurphy@crowell.com

sseiden@crowell.com

dan.weiss@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com United Airlines

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com UP S

jegillick@zsrlaw.com Tampa Cargo

bill@mietuslaw.com Sky Lease

cristinasa@state.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

darren.jaffe@dot.gov

reese.davidson@dot.gov

kgeorge@broward.org F LL

info@airlineinfo.com
#### Dorman STRAHAN, d/b/a Strahan Painting Company v. LANDIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company.

No. 86-C-2544.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Strahan, Dorman d/b/a; Strahan Painting Company; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5011; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “L”, No. 85-6340.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 417.

Granted. Consolidated for argument with 86-C-2443.