alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Registrant's 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,824
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,727
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,644
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          9
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,908
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,759
<LOANS>                                        148,115
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 174,267
<DEPOSITS>                                     131,033
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,221
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,947
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,960
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                          95
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 174,267
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,882
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,113
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   877
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,872
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,945
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,764
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,108
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,411
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 153
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,377)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (7,377)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.72)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.41
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,908
<LOANS-PAST>                                        30
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   223
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2304
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,251
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,132
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,556
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,440
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            116


</TABLE>
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 00198

- CR

M ISAEL N UNEZMARQUEZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 485th District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1811304 )

August 22, 2024

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

AMERICAN PATRIOT FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION - CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, T. Don Waddell, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofAmerican Patriot Financial Group, Inc.

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)             Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

a)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

a)             All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:   November 14, 2007 | Signature: | /s/ T. Don Waddell                      |
|--------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                           |       | T. Don Waddell  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 309 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 309

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2002

Received and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
                                Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the importance of good cervical health and of detecting 
              cervical cancer during its earliest stages.

Whereas approximately 12,900 women are diagnosed with, and 4,400 women die from, 
        cervical cancer in the United States each year;
Whereas women who are members of certain racial or ethnic minorities and women 
        who have a low income are more likely than other women to die from 
        cervical cancer;
Whereas cervical cancer is primarily caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV) 
        and can be detected by a Papanicolaou test (Pap test) or other early 
        detection tests;
Whereas the earlier cervical cancer is detected the better chance a woman has of 
        surviving cervical cancer;
Whereas women of certain racial or ethnic minorities, women who have less than a 
        high school education, and women who have a low income are less likely 
        than other women to receive a Pap test or other early detection test for 
        cervical cancer; and
Whereas cervical cancer survivors have shown tremendous courage and 
        determination in the face of adversity: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the importance of good cervical health and 
        of detecting cervical cancer during its earliest stages;
            (2) urges health care facilities and other medical 
        institutions to continue to raise public awareness about 
        cervical cancer and the importance of early detection;
            (3) urges the people of the United States to learn about 
        cervical cancer and the importance of early detection; and
            (4) recognizes the survivors of cervical cancer for their 
        tremendous courage and determination.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN KELLY DESTRAT, DOC #Y62415, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 2D17-3049 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed October 12, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Mark A. Steinbeck, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Robert D. Rosen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Brandon R. Christian, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEBRUARY 3, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-10942

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-60357-CR-KAM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CORNELIUS BRAYBOY,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 3, 2009)

Before BARKETT, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Edward D. Reagan, appointed counsel for Cornelius Brayboy, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.

1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brayboy’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 225 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 225

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked and destroyed four commercial 
        aircraft, crashing two of them into the World Trade Center in New York 
        City, and crashing another aircraft into the Pentagon outside 
        Washington, D.C.; and
Whereas thousands of innocent people were killed and injured as a result of 
        those attacks, including the passengers and crew of the four aircraft, 
        workers and visitors in the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, rescue 
        workers, and bystanders: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) in response to the terrorist attacks on the United 
        States on September 11, 2001, United States citizens should 
        join together to defend and honor the Nation and its symbols of 
        strength; and
            (2) for a period of 30 days after the date on which this 
        resolution is agreed to, each United States citizen and every 
        community in the Nation is encouraged to display the flag of 
        the United States at homes, places of work and business, public 
        buildings, and places of worship to remember those individuals 
        who have been lost and to show the solidarity, resolve, and 
        strength of the Nation.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 225

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that, as a symbol of solidarity 
 following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 
2001, every United States citizen is encouraged to display the flag of 
                           the United States.
```
##### 



POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 6, 2007
    /s/  Robert B. TothRobert B. TothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
May	1,	2015

Petition	for	Exemption	14	CFR	11.81

Dave	Kettering

801	Bluff	Street

Dubuque,	Iowa

52001

(563)-588-5715,	(563)	590-8205

14	CFR

Exemption for Section 333: As of March 23, 2015, the FAA will automatically grant a 

"blanket" COA for flights at or below 200 feet to any UAS operator with a Section 333 

exemption, provided the aircraft weighs less than 55 pounds, operations are conducted 

during daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions and within visual line of sight (VLOS) 

of the pilots, and stay certain distances away from airports or heliports.

Aerial	photography	under	the	current	blanket	COA.

Photos	would	provide	a	unique	view	of	our	historic	community	and	farmland.		

Photos	will	provide	a	unique	eye	catching	and	informational	view	of	news.

A	professional	approach	to	any	situation	and	will	provide	a	“safety	first”	attitude	

during	the	flight	route.		In	our	case	we	have	a	separate	pilot	remote	as	well	as	an	

additional	remote	to	control	a	camera.		Line	of	sight	will	never	be	obstructed	and	

will	obide	by	all	rules	of	un-manned	flight	vehicles	including	a	safe	distance	from	

airports	as	well	as	all	flight	pads	or	heliports.

My	goal	in	obtaining	the	exemption	for	14	CFR	11.81 section	333	is	to	add	the	

advantage	of	aerial	footage	used	to	entertain	my	clients,	provide	them	with	a	

different	perspective	of	life	and	give	them	a	different	view	of	several	various	news	

situations.

1jz-8knt-jx0h

1jz-8kog-xmq1
1jz-8krw-merh
#### STATE ex rel. Wilfred BATISTE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-1088.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Batiste, Wilfred; applying for supervisory and/or remedial write; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”.

Denied. Relator must first file his application in the district court.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50853

Conference Calendar

 

STEVEN EDWARD MOSS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GUADALUPE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; MELVIN HARBORTH, SHERIFF;

BRENDA BOUNDS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-94-CV-864

- - - - - - - - - -

August 21, 1996

Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steven Moss, T.D.C.J.# 592042, a convicted prisoner, appeals

the dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

alleging denial of access to medical care, deprivation of liberty

without due process, and denial of access to the courts. We have

reviewed the record and the opinion of the magistrate judge, and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the same

reasons given by the magistrate judge. Moss v. Guadalupe County
No. 95-50853

- 2 -

Commissioners, No. SA-94-CV-864 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 352 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 352

    Relative to the death of Representative Herbert H. Bateman, of 
                               Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Relative to the death of Representative Herbert H. Bateman, of 
                               Virginia.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Herbert H. 
Bateman, late a Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia.
    Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the 
House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the 
family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned 
as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased 
Representative.
                                 <all>
```
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 0 9- 40043 Su m m ar y Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f –A pp el l ee,

v. ESI Q U I EL D E LO S SAN TO S,

D efen d a n t–A p p ell a n t.

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 2 : 0 5

- CR- 2 0

- ALL

B e fo r e G A R Z A , C L E M E N T , a n dO W E N , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R IA M: * E si qui elD e Los Sant os appeal s f r om t he di st r i c tc our t ’ s January 12, 2009, j u dg m en trevoki n g h i s s u pervi sed rel ease an d i m posi n ga 24-m on t h t erm of i m pri so nm entt o be f oll ow ed by an 18- m ont h supervi se d r el eas e t er m . As s pec i al
co n d itio n s o f h is su p e rv ision , th e d istr ict co u rt o rd e re dD e L o s S a n to s, “[a]s de e m e d ne c e s s ar y byt he pr o ba t i o n o f f i c e r , ” t o p art i c i pa t e i n adr ug t r e at m e nt pro gr am and i n a m ent al heal t h t r eat m ent pro gr am . D e Los Sant os ar gues t hat United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 8, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40043

2 t he di s t r i c tc o ur tco m m i t t e d pl ai n er r o rby de l e ga t i ng t o t he pr o ba t i o n o f f i c e rt he aut ho r i t y t o de c i de w he t he rhe s ho ul d un de r go m e nt alhe alt h a nd d r ug t r eat m ent
. Ci t i ng Un i t ed S t ate s v. A l bro , 3 2 F. 3d1 73 , 1 74 ( 5t h Ci r . 1 99 4) , he
a rg u e s t h a t t h e d i stri ct cou rt i m p erm i ssibly d elega tedi ts A rti cl e III po w er to i m pose cond i t i on s of

sup ervi sed rel ease by givi n g t h e probati on of f i cer di scr et i on t o de c i de w he t he rhe s ho ul d p art i c i pa t e i n m e nt alhe alt h a nd d r ug t r e at m e nt p r o g r a m s . T o show pl ai n e r r o r , D e Los Sant o s m us t s ho w an e r r o r t hat i s c l e aror o b v io u s a n dt h a t a ffe c ts h is s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts
. Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ak er , 538 F. 3d 3 2 4 , 3 3 2 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 29 S. Ct
. 9 62 ( 20 09 )
. Ourpr e c e de nt s do
n o t p la in lyre q u ir e th e re s u lt D e L o s S a n to s u r g e s . S ee Uni t e d S t at e s v. Vega , 3 3 2 F .3d 8 4 9 , 8 5 3 -5 4 (5t h C ir
. 2 0 0 3 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. W ard en , 291 F. 3d 363, 3 6 5 -6 6 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ). * * * T h e ju d g m e n t is A F F IR M E D
.