alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4

                           SHORT TERM PROMISSORY NOTE

US$1,500.00                                                        April 1, 2005

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Voyager One, Inc. promises to pay to the order of
Castle Hill Advisory Group at such place as the holder of this Note may from
time to time designate, the principal sum of one thousand five hundred and
00/100 (US$1,500.00) together with simple interest from April 1, 2005 at the
rate of six percent (6) per annum on the principal balance.

         The note matures and becomes due July 31, 2005. The amount of the
payment shall be an amount equal to the outstanding principal and unpaid
interest.

         All payments on account of the indebtedness evidenced by this note
shall be first applied to interest on the unpaid principal balance and the
remainder to principal.

         All parties to this note severally waive presentment for payment,
notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest.

         This note is effective April 1, 2005 regardless of when it is signed.


Voyager One, Inc.                             Sebastien C. DuFort
859 West End Court
Suite I                                       BY:    /s/ Sebastien C. DuFort
Vernon Hills, IL 60061                              -----------------------
Phone: 847-984-6200                                    SIGNATURE & DATE
Fax: 847-984-6201


BY:    /s/ John A. Lichter
       --------------------
         SIGNATURE & DATE
         JOHN A. LICHTER
         CEO


<PAGE>



                                   CONSENT TO
               FIRST AMENDMENT OF SHORT TERM PROMISSORY NOTE DATED
                                  APRIL 1, 2005

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Castle Hill Advisory Group and
Voyager One, Inc., a Nevada corporation, hereby consent to a First Amendment of
the terms of the Short Term Promissory Note dated April 1, 2005 with an original
principal amount of $1,500 as follows:

         1. The maturity date of July 31, 2005 is hereby extended to anytime on
         demand after August 9, 2005.

         2. This Consent is effective July 31, 2005 regardless of when it is
         signed. The remaining terms of the original note dated April 1, 2005
         shall remain in full force and effect.


                           "Payee"


Name:             Castle Hill Advisory Group
Address:          433 S. Washington St.
                  Hinsdale, IL   60521

Phone             630-546-6672
Fax               630-321-0872

                  By:  /s/ Sebastien C. DuFort
                       ------------------------
                           Signature and Date
                           Sebastien C. DuFort
                           Managing Director
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald FEAZELL.

No. 86-K-0838.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Feazell, Donald; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR-85-730; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 208732.

Prior report: La.App., 486 So.2d 327.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 176 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 176

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2001

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives 
         and a conditional recess or adjournment of the Senate.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, June 
28, 2001, or Friday, June 29, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand

adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, July 10, 2001, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thursday, 
June 28, 2001, Friday, June 29, 2001, Saturday, June 30, 2001, Monday, 
July 2, 2001, Tuesday, July 3, 2001, Thursday, July 5, 2001, Friday, 
July 6, 2001, or Saturday, July 7, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant 
to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, 
it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 9, 2001, or 
until such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on 
the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to 
section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble 
whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Darrel Eugene BRADY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 17679.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 20, 1982.

Milton T. Harmon, Nephi, Ronald J. Yen-gich, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

*1133David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

In *Hardy v. Morris,*Utah, 636 P.2d 473 (1981), we dismissed the appeal of a defendant who had escaped from custody, reasoning that a ruling adverse to the appellant could not be enforced because he had placed himself outside the control of the judicial system. That holding does not define whether or when such an appeal can be reinstated.

In this case, appellant filed a timely notice of appeal after conviction and sentence for aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, and unlawful taking of a motor vehicle. Five months after he commenced serving his sentence in the Utah State Penitentiary, on August 7, 1981, appellant escaped. On motion of the State, on September 21, 1981, this Court dismissed appellant’s appeal on the authority of *Hardy v. Morris, supra.*Thereafter, appellant was recaptured in Idaho and reincarcerated in the Penitentiary on March 23, 1982. Appellant now moves to reinstate his appeal.

By escaping and remaining at large until he was involuntarily returned to custody, appellant abandoned his appeal and now stands in the same position as if no appeal had been taken. *Mitchell v. State,*Fla.App., 294 So.2d 395 (1974); Weser v. *State,*224 Kan. 272, 579 P.2d 1214 (1978); *United States v. Smith,*544 F.2d 832 (5th Cir.1977). In this circumstance, an appeal dismissed prior to his return to custody will not be reinstated.

This action violates no right under the Utah Constitution, Art. I, § 12, since appellant had his “right to appeal” and abandoned it. It likewise violates no federal constitutional right. *Estelle v. Dorrough,*420 U.S. 534, 95 S.Ct. 1173, 43 L.Ed.2d 377 (1975); *Allen v. Georgia,*166 U.S. 138, 17 S.Ct. 525, 41 L.Ed. 949 (1897).

Motion denied.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (2.61 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
April 17, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WALTER HINTON, JR., Appellant

NO. 14-13-00116-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 317 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 317

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should open a 
  dialog with the Government of Canada to discuss the smuggling from 
Canada into the United States of large quantities of pseudoephedrine, a 
      necessary ingredient in the production of methamphetamines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2002

 Mr. Radanovich (for himself, Mr. Baird, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Boswell, and 
 Mr. Cannon) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the President should open a 
  dialog with the Government of Canada to discuss the smuggling from 
Canada into the United States of large quantities of pseudoephedrine, a 
      necessary ingredient in the production of methamphetamines.

Whereas pseudoephedrine is the active ingredient in many over-the-counter cold 
        medicines;
Whereas pseudoephedrine is also a necessary ingredient in the production of 
        methamphetamines;
Whereas the production and use of methamphetamines is a serious problem in the 
        United States;
Whereas large quantities of pseudoephedrine are necessary to produce large 
        quantities of methamphetamine;
Whereas the Federal Government and the private sector have cooperatively ensured 
        that pseudoephedrine sold in the United States is packaged in blister 
        packs or in bottles containing 24 or fewer grams of pseudoephedrine;
Whereas Canadian manufacturers produce pseudoephedrine in bottles containing as 
        many as 1,920 grams of pseudoephedrine;
Whereas in recent years Federal narcotics investigators have found 
        pseudoephedrine from Canada in methamphetamine labs in the United States 
        with increasing frequency and in larger quantities;
Whereas from 1994 to 2000 the importation of pseudoephedrine powder to Canada 
        increased by 817 percent; and
Whereas large quantities of pseudoephedrine from Canada are being smuggled into 
        the United States to be used in the production of methamphetamines: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the President should open a 
dialog with the Government of Canada to discuss--
            (1) the smuggling from Canada into the United States of 
        large quantities of pseudoephedrine, a necessary ingredient in 
        the production of methamphetamines; and
            (2) methods to restrict the quantity of pseudoephedrine 
        that Canadian manufacturers can package in a single container.
                                 <all>
```
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 1588

_____________________________
U RANA H ARRIS , Appellant,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT OF B USINESS AND P ROFESSIONAL R EGULATION , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

. May 3, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

O STERHAUS , C.J., and R AY and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marie A. Mattox and Ashley N. Richardson, of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant

. Jamie Ito of Ito Law PLLC, Tallahassee, and Joseph Y. Whealdon III, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.
**
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Gary Klayn, Chief Financial Officer of Onex Falcon Direct Lending BDC Fund, certify that: 

 
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Onex Falcon DirectLending BDC Fund (the “registrant”); 

 
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 
 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 
 4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 
 5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 
 (a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 
 (b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: March 31, 2022 

 
By: 
/s/ Gary Klayn
 Gary Klayn Chief Financial Officer**
---



Exhibit 13.2

In
  connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”)
  on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Bardell,
  Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
  Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | • | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | • | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Michael A. Bardell                                                                        | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Michael A. Bardell Chief Financial Officer
      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 
|                                                                                              | 
|March 29, 2005                                                                                | 

---
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Procaps Group, S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patricio Vargas Muñoz,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(i) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Patricio
Vargas Muñoz |                        
|------------------------- | -----------------------
|Name:                     | Patricio Vargas Muñoz  
|Title:                    | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                     | April 29, 2022
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 324 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 324

 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2002

    Mr. Pitts (for himself, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Lantos) submitted the 
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

                           February 12, 2002

   Committee on International Relations discharged; considered under 
                 suspension of the rules and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his leadership 
         and friendship and welcoming him to the United States.

Whereas President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan has shown courageous leadership 
        in cooperating with the United States in the fight against terrorism;
Whereas President Musharraf has shown great fortitude in confronting extremists 
        and outlawing terrorism in Pakistan;
Whereas the efforts of President Musharraf in fighting terrorism are both in the 
        national interest of Pakistan and of great importance to Pakistani-
        American relations;
Whereas the war against terrorism underscores the importance of strengthening 
        the historic bilateral relationship between the United States and 
        Pakistan;
Whereas President Musharraf has worked to improve the political representation 
        of minorities in Pakistan; and
Whereas the Pakistani-American community in the United States makes important 
        contributions to the United States and plays a vital role in developing 
        a closer relationship between the peoples of the United States and 
        Pakistan: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That Congress commends President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan for his 
leadership and friendship and welcomes him to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 04, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 04, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0404. RAMONA BENNETT v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: CV150329