alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40241 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CARLOS ALBERTO VASQUEZ

- NAVARRO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 935

- 1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carlos Alberto Vasquez

- Navarro appeals the 70

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of illegal reentry. Relying on United States v. Herrold , 883 F.3d 5 17, 529, 541 (5th Cir. 2018) (en banc), petitions for cert. filed (Apr. 18, 2018) (No. 17

- 1445) and (May 21 , 2018 ) (No.
17

- 9127), he argues that the district court erred by applying a 16

- level adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) (2015) because his two

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circums tances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 8, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40241 Document: 00514786380 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2019No. 17

- 40241

2 prior felony burglary convictions under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a) are not categorically crimes of violence. The Government correctly concedes that the district court’s application of the 16

- level adjustment is erroneous in light of Herrold

. See United States v. Godoy , 890 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, the Government raises the followin g arguments to preserve them for further review: (1) that, under the categorical approach, § 30.02(a) is a crime of violence because all of its subsections match the generic burglary offense and, alternatively, (2) that the Texas burglary statute is divisi ble and that Vasquez

- Navarro’s prior convictions are crimes of violence under the modified categorical approach. The Government has made no attempt to show that the error in this case was harmless. See United States v. Martinez

- Romero , 817 F.3d 917, 924 (5th Cir. 2016) . Instead the Government asks that we hold this case in abeyance pending the certiorari determinations in Herrold and in a similar case, United States v. Quarles , 850 F.3d 836 (6th Cir.), petition for cert. filed (Nov. 24, 2017) (17

- 778). We decline to do so. The sentence in this case is vacated and the matter is remanded for resentencing in light of Herrold

. SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING. MOTION DENIED. Case: 17-40241 Document: 00514786380 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2019
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian C. Harriss, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Atlantic Holding Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Brian C. Harriss
|Name:                |  | Brian C. Harriss       
|Title:               |  | Chief Financial Officer
Project: 14-421

7900 Hickman Road, Suite 1 / Windsor Heights, Iowa 50324 

515-725-9500 FAX 515-725-9501

877-AIR-IOWA 

July 13, 2015

Stephanie Doolan

Air & Waste Management Division

Air Planning and Development Branch

U.S. EPA Region 7

11201 Renner Boulevard

Lenexa, KS 66219

Subject: Project Number 14-421; Plant No. 78-01-012

Griffin Pipe Products Co. – Council Bluffs, IA

Dear Ms. Doolan:

Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that is being published in The Daily Nonpareil. This public notice is in regards to

Griffin Pipes Products’ construction permit application for the cupola at their facility. The purpose of this 

application is to establish lead emission limitations in response to the nonattainment designation published in 

the Federal Register on November 22, 2011 (76 FR 72097). The Department is proceeding with the permitting 

process for the cupola located at 2601 9

th Avenue, Council Bluffs, IA.

This notice is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR 51.161, which requires that specific notification of 

this public notice be given to you. Also attached are the other documents relevant to this project for permitting the cupola

and establishing lead emission limits. 

Should you have any questions, please contact me at 515-725-9521.

Sincerely,

Shawn Corbin

Environmental Engineer

Construction Permits Section

Air Quality Bureau

Enclosures – Notice of Intent, Technical Support Document, Draft Permit, Consent Decree & Permit Application
Order entered July 1 9 , 2017

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00153

- CR

JOSHUA CORNELL SKINN ER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204t h Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15

- 20176

- Q



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s July 1 8 , 2017 motion for extension of time to file his

brief. We DENY his motion as moot.

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
May 22, 2018

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DARON TAYLOR, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00583-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, Daron 

Taylor. We order the motion be denied, and the court’s former judgment of March 

29, 2018 be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion 

of March 29, 2018, withdrawn.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record reveals error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment of the 178th 

District Court VACATED and the case DISMISSED in that court. The cause 

remains pending in the 315th District Court for further proceedings in accordance 

with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the              Report. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: September 12, 2022 |                                                         |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                                         |
|                     | /s/ Jonathan Neill                                           |
|                     | Jonathan Neill                                               |
|                     | Interim Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
#### J. Herbert Ballantine, Respondent, *v.*James T. Beckwith, Appellant.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the. first judicial department, entered December 8, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for damages to personal property-alleged to have been caused through the negligence of the defendant.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the verdict was supported by the evidence, and that no questions of law were raised that could be reviewed by the Court of Appeals.

*William R. Hill*for motion.

*Duncan Edwards*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
#### Michael D. RICHE v. CITY OF BATON ROUGE and Parish of East Baton Rouge.

No. 87-C-1108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Riche, Michael D.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0287; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 235544.

Prior report: La.App., 507 So.2d 21.

Granted.
### NU M BER 13- 09- 0001 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ EUG ENE X. M ERC IER, IND IVIDU A LLY, A pp ellan t,
v . M A R GA R ETMEGA N IN GL E, IN D IV ID U A L LY, A N D T H E IN GL E LA

W F IR M , L .L .C ., A p p el le es .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ On ap pe al f rom th e 2 8th D istrict Co urt of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ju stice s Y añ ez , R od rigu ez, an d Be na v ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Ap pe l l an t, E ug en e X

. M erc i er , In di v i du al l y , atte mp te d to p er fect an a pp ea l from a jud g ment ent ered by

the 28th Di str ict C our

t o f N u e ces C ounty , Texas, i n c ause number 07- 5198-A. Judg ment i n thi s caus e w as si g ned on Oct ober 9, 2008. A moti on for

newtr ial
w as fi l e d o n N o v e mb e r 7 , 2 0 0 8

. P u rs u a n t t o Te x a s R u l e o f A p p e l l a t e P ro c e d u re 26.1 ,2

app ellant ’s notice of app eal w as du e on Janu ary7, 200 9, bu t was no t f iled un til Janua ry 8, 20 09. On J anuar

y 13, 2009, the C ler k o f this Cour t notifie d appell ant of thi s defect s o tha t ste ps coul d be tak en to co rrectthe defect, if i t c oul d be done. Appel lan t w as adv is ed th at, if t he defect w as no t corrected w ithin te n da ys f rom th e da te of receipt of

this Court’s letter, the a ppeal woul d be dis mis sed. To date , no re spons e has been re cei v ed f ro m appel lan t. Th e Court, h aving ex am ined and f ully conside red the docu me nts on f ile, app ellant ’s failu re to ti mely

per fect hi s a ppeal , and app ell ant’ s fai lure to re spond to thi s C our t’ s n oti ce, is o f t h e o p in io n t h a tt h e a p p e a l s h o u ld b e d is m is s e d fo r wa n to f ju ri s d ic t io n
. A c c o rd in gl y, the a ppeal i s h ereby

DISM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF JU RI SD IC TION

. SeeT EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42. 3(a)(c). P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 26th day

of Ma rc h, 20 09.
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-01585-CV SUSAN ANN FISHER, Appellant V. MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, CYNTHI A CARTER, R.N., ANNE W. HANDLEY, R.N. AND RAY J. DELGADILL O, R.T., Appellees

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-01024-2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Lang-Miers, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Before the Court is appellees’ February 13, 2015, motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. In case No. 05-14-01441-cv, appell ant appealed an order of th e trial court dated October 17, 2014, that dismissed her medical liability claims against two physicians for failure to comply with chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. While that appeal was pending, appellant filed this case appealing two more or ders of the trial cour t dated November 14, 2014, that dismissed her medical liability claims ag ainst Medical Center of Plano, Cynthia Carter, R.N., Anne Handley, R.N., and Ray Delgadillo, R.T. In this Court’s opinion of appellant’s appeal against the physicians, we explained that we do not have jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal b ecause claims remain against a defendant in the–2– suit below. See Fisher v. Medical Center of Plano, et al. , No. 05-14-01441-CV, 2015 WL 73441 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 6, 2015, no pe t. h.) (mem. op.). The trial co urt has neither rendered final judgment nor signed an appealable in terlocutory order in this case. Id . For the same reasons, this Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. We DISMISS this appeal.

141585F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

SUSAN ANN FISHER, Appellant

No. 05-14-01585-CV V.

MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, CYNTHIA CARTER, ANN W. HANDLEY, R.N. AND RAY J. DELGADILLO, R.T., Appellees On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-01024-2014. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction.

It is ORDERED that appellee MEDICAL CENTER OF PLANO, CYNTHIA CARTER, ANN W. HANDLEY, R.N. AND RAY J. DELGADILLO, R.T. recover th eir costs of this appeal from appellant SUSAN ANN FISHER.

Judgment entered March 18, 2015.
SPA 16
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 141 

# • Testing and MonitoringActivities Amendment II 60 FR 17001-17004 April 4, 1995 (RCRA ClusterV, Non-HSWA provisions)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION WAC 173-303- STATE ANALOG IS: EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRIN- STRIN- IN SCOPE GENT GENT PART 260 - HAZARDOUSWASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS REFERENCES 

# • replace the 260.11(a) 110(3)(a) 

### X reference for "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" with new reference to include Update liB; update phone number


# •

CL141.16- Revised: 11/8/96 Printed: 10/21198 April 4, 1995 - Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Brian C. Harriss, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Atlantic Holding Company, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006
|                        | 
|                        |  | /s/ Brian C. Harriss   
|Name:                   |  | Brian C. Harriss       
|Title:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02188

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 02188\02188_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02188\02188_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02188\02188_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02188\02188_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02188\02188_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02188\02188_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02188\02188_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02188\02188_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

02188\Certification Statement Plant ID 02188.pdf Plant certification statement

x 02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_Part D_CBI_5-10_IWT Basin Kreitz Proposal.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartA_A5-2_MAP-1_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartA_A5-2_MAP-2_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartA_A5-2_Map-3_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartA_A5-2_Map-4_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartA_A5-3_WB-1_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02188\Supplemental Documents\02188_PartD_D3-1_WWT-1_Titus.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database .
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 170

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 11, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban

Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Encouraging corporations to contribute to faith-based

organizations.

Whereas America’s community of faith has long played a

leading role in dealing with difficult societal problems

that might otherwise have gone unaddressed;

Whereas President Bush has called upon Americans ‘‘to revive the spirit of citizenship . . . to marshal the compassion of our people to meet the continuing needs of our

Nation’’;
2

HCON 170 RFS

Whereas although the work of faith-based organizations

should not be used by government as an excuse for backing away from its historic and rightful commitment to

help those who are disadvantaged and in need, such organizations can and should be seen as a valuable partner

with government in meeting societal challenges;

Whereas every day faith-based organizations in the United

States help people recover from drug and alcohol addiction, provide food and shelter for the homeless, rehabilitate prison inmates so that they can break free from the

cycle of recidivism, and teach people job skills that will

allow them to move from poverty to productivity;

Whereas faith-based organizations are often more successful

in dealing with difficult societal problems than government and non-sectarian organizations;

Whereas, as President Bush recently stated, ‘‘It is not sufficient to praise charities and community groups; we must

support them. And this is both a public obligation and

a personal responsibility.’’;

Whereas corporate foundations contribute billions of dollars

each year to a variety of philanthropic causes;

Whereas according to a recent study produced by the Capital

Research Center, the 10 largest corporate foundations in

the United States contributed $1,900,000,000 to such

causes;

Whereas according to the same study, faith-based organizations only receive a small fraction of the contributions

made by corporations in the United States, and 6 of the

10 corporations that give the most to philanthropic

causes explicitly ban or restrict contributions to faithbased organizations: Now, therefore, be it
3

HCON 170 RFS

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress calls on corporations in the United

4 States, in the words of the President, ‘‘to give more

5 and to give better’’ by making greater contributions

6 to faith-based organizations that are on the front

7 lines battling some of the great societal challenges of

8 our day; and

9 (2) it is the sense of Congress that—

10 (A) corporations in the United States are

11 important partners with government in efforts

12 to overcome difficult societal problems; and

13 (B) no corporation in the United States

14 should adopt policies that prohibit the corpora15 tion from contributing to an organization that

16 is successfully advancing a philanthropic cause

17 merely because such organization is faith based.

Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.