19190 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices 

11 If one of the above-named companies do not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam who have not 

qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be 

covered by this review as part of the single Vietnam 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

12Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(c) the Department 

received a request to defer the administrative 

review with respect to Misumi Corporation for one 

year. The Department did not receive any objections 

to the deferral within 15 days after the end of the 

anniversary month. As such, we will initiate the 

administrative review with respect to Misumi 

Corporation in the month immediately following 

the next anniversary month. 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 76 FR 45773 

(August 1, 2011). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and 

Requests for Revocations in Part, 76 FR 61076 

(October 3, 2011) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that the meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information. See section 782(b) 

of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded 

that revised certification requirements 

are in effect for company/government 

officials as well as their representatives 

in all segments of any antidumping duty 

or countervailing duty proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final 

Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions in 

any proceeding segments initiated on or 

after March 14, 2011 if the submitting 

party does not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: March 27, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7723 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–909] 

Certain Steel Nails From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for the Preliminary Results of the 

Third Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jamie Blair-Walker, Office 9, AD/CVD 

Operations, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2615. 

Background 

On August 1, 2011, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on certain steel nails 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) for the period of review August 

1, 2010, through July 31, 2011.1 Based 

upon requests for review from various 

parties, on October 3, 2011, the 

Department initiated the third 

antidumping duty administrative review 

on certain steel nails from the PRC, 

covering 383 companies.2 The 

preliminary results of review are 

currently due May 2, 2012. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within these time 

periods, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary 

determination to a maximum of 365 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results of Review 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review within the current time 

limits. The Department requires 

additional time to analyze recently 

submitted supplemental questionnaire 

responses, which contained a significant 

amount of new sales and factors of 

production data. The additional time is 

needed to consider these data and their 

incorporation into the margin 

calculations for the individuallyreviewed respondents. Additionally, at 

parties’ request, the Department 

extended the deadline for submitting 

surrogate country and surrogate value 

data and comments. Therefore, the 

Department is hereby fully extending 

the time limits for completion of the 

preliminary results by 120 days. The 

preliminary results will now be due no 

later than August 30, 2012. The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

the publication of the preliminary 

results. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 62 / Friday, March 30, 2012 / Notices 19191 

1See Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results and Final 

Partial Rescission of Second Antidumping 

Administrative Review, 77 FR 12553 (March 1, 

2012) (‘‘Final Results’’). 

2M&B Metal Products Co., Inc. (‘‘Petitioner’’). 

3 In the Final Results, the Department found that 

that Shanghai Wells, Hong Kong Wells Limited 

(‘‘HK Wells’’) and Hong Kong Wells Limited (USA) 

(‘‘USA Wells’’) (collectively, ‘‘Wells Group’’) are 

affiliated and that Shanghai Wells and HK Wells 

comprise a single entity. See Final Results, 77 FR 

at 12554 n. 4. Petitioner’s ministerial error 

allegations do not challenge, and these amended 

final results do not affect, that determination. 

4See section 751(h) of the Act; see also 19 CFR 

351.224(f). 

5Petitioner states we made these adjustments to 

J&K Wire. However, the Department made these 

adjustments to Bandsidhar Granites Pvt. Ltd. 

(‘‘Bansidhar’’) and Nasco’s financial ratios. 

Moreover, consistent with the Department’s 

practice, we included net changes in traded goods 

in the SG&A and profit ratios for Bansidhar alone, 

given that we only make such an adjustment when 

the information is available and Bansidhar was the 

only surrogate company with a traded goods line 

item in its financial statement. 

Dated: March 26, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7743 Filed 3–29–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–918] 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results of the Second 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 30, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob 

Palmer, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0968. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2012, the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

the final results of the second 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel wire 

garment hangers (‘‘hangers’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1

On March 5, 2012, Petitioner 2 filed a 

timely allegation that the Department 

made two ministerial errors in the Final 

Results and requested, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.224, that the Department 

correct the alleged ministerial errors. No 

other party in this proceeding submitted 

comments on the Department’s final 

margin calculations. Based upon our 

analysis of the comments and 

allegations of ministerial errors, we have 

made changes to the margin calculations 

for Shanghai Wells Hanger Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shanghai Wells’’).3 Additionally, 

because no other parties received a 

separate rate in this administrative 

review, the changes to Shanghai Wells’ 

margin will not change the current rates 

of any other parties. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is steel wire garment hangers, fabricated 

from carbon steel wire, whether or not 

galvanized or painted, whether or not 

coated with latex or epoxy or similar 

gripping materials, and/or whether or 

not fashioned with paper covers or 

capes (with or without printing) and/or 

nonslip features such as saddles or 

tubes. These products may also be 

referred to by a commercial designation, 

such as shirt, suit, strut, caped, or latex 

(industrial) hangers. Specifically 

excluded from the scope of the order are 

wooden, plastic, and other garment 

hangers that are not made of steel wire. 

Also excluded from the scope of the 

order are chrome-plated steel wire 

garment hangers with a diameter of 3.4 

mm or greater. The products subject to 

the order are currently classified under 

U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) subheadings 7326.20.0020, 

7323.99.9060, and 7323.99.9080. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise is dispositive. 

Amended Final Results of the Review 

The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(‘‘Act’’), defines a ‘‘ministerial error’’ as 

including ‘‘errors in addition, 

subtraction, or other arithmetic 

function, clerical errors resulting from 

inaccurate copying, duplication, or the 

like, and any other type of unintentional 

error which the administering authority 

considers ministerial.’’ 4 After analyzing 

Petitioner’s comments, we have 

determined that we made certain 

ministerial errors, as defined by section 

751(h) of the Act, in our calculations for 

the Final Results. 

First, we agree with Petitioner that we 

made a ministerial error in the 

calculation of the surrogate financial 

ratios of Nasco Steel Pvt., Ltd. 

(‘‘Nasco’’), which were used in 

Shanghai Wells’ margin calculation. 

Specifically, the Department 

inadvertently excluded Nasco’s 

commission on sales from selling, 

general and administrative expenses 

(SG&A’’) for the calculation of surrogate 

SG&A ratio calculation, when we 

instead intended to include Nasco’s 

commission on sales in the surrogate 

SG&A ratio calculation. Lastly, we agree 

with Petitioner’s second ministerial 

error allegation regarding the treatment 

of the net changes in finished goods 

inventory in the calculation of Sterling 

Tools Limited’s (‘‘Sterling’’) surrogate 

financial ratio calculations. Specifically, 

the Department inadvertently excluded 

the net changes in finished goods in the 

surrogate SG&A and profit ratio 

calculations for Sterling, when we 

instead intended to include the net 

changes in finished goods inventories in 

Sterling’s SG&A and profit ratios. 

Additionally, when reviewing the 

financial ratio calculations for J&K Wire 

Steel Industries Ltd. (‘‘JK Wire’’), we 

noted that we made the same 

inadvertent error in JK Wire’s SG&A and 

profit ratio calculation.5 For a detailed 

discussion of these ministerial errors, as 

well as the Department’s analysis of 

these errors, see Memorandum to James 

C. Doyle, from Bob Palmer, regarding 

‘‘Second Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Steel Wire 

Garment Hangers from the People’s 

Republic of China: Ministerial Error 

Memorandum,’’ dated concurrently 

with this notice (‘‘Ministerial Memo’’). 

The Ministerial Memo is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Import Administration’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(‘‘IA ACCESS’’). Access to IA ACCESS 

is available in the Central Records Unit 

(‘‘CRU’’), Main Commerce Building, 

Room 7046. In addition, a complete 

version of the Ministerial Memo can be 

accessed directly on the Internet at 

http://www.trade.gov/ia. The paper 

copy and electronic versions of the 

Ministerial Memo are identical in 

content. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e), 

we are amending the Final Results of the 

administrative review of steel wire 

garment hangers from the PRC. Listed 

below are the weighted average 

dumping margins for these amended 

final results: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES