alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2363 

To extend and modify temporarily the suspension of duty on Methylionone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and modify temporarily the suspension of duty 

on Methylionone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METHYLIONONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.10 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3-Methyl-4-(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-2-enyl)but-3-en-2-one 

7 (Methylionone)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking the rate in the Rates of Duty, 

9 General column, and inserting ‘‘0.6%’’; and 

10 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

11 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2363 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Saanii <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 1:12 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: Re: FW: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

Shasheerah,

I am getting ready to call him and will let you know what he says. Rena

Dinetahdoo Cultural Resources Management, LLC P.O. Box 2012, Farmington NM 87499

10076 US Hwy 371, S of Farmington, NM

Phone (505) 960

‐ 9478Fax (505) 960

‐ 9749

Email dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Website: www.dinetahdoo.com

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

On Thu, 1/8/15, Kelly, Shaheerah <Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov> wrote:

Subject: FW: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

To: "dinetahdoo@yahoo.com" <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Date: Thursday, January 8, 2015, 1:15 PM

#yiv2572859877

#yiv2572859877

‐‐

_filtered #yiv2572859877 {panose

‐ 1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}

_filtered #yiv2572859877 {font

‐ family:Calibri;panose

‐ 1:2 15

5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}

_filtered #yiv2572859877 {font

‐ family:Verdana;panose

‐ 1:2 11

6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}

#yiv2572859877

#yiv2572859877 p.yiv2572859877MsoNormal, #yiv2572859877 li.yiv2572859877MsoNormal, #yiv2572859877

div.yiv2572859877MsoNormal {margin:0in;margin

‐ bottom:.0001pt;font

‐ size:11.0pt;}

#yiv2572859877 a:link, #yiv2572859877

span.yiv2572859877MsoHyperlink

{color:#0563C1;text

‐ decoration:underline;}

#yiv2572859877 a:visited, #yiv2572859877 span.yiv2572859877MsoHyperlinkFollowed

{color:#954F72;text

‐ decoration:underline;}

#yiv2572859877 span.yiv2572859877EmailStyle17 {color:windowtext;}

#yiv2572859877 span.yiv2572859877EmailStyle18 {color:#1F497D;}

#yiv2572859877 .yiv2572859877MsoChpDefault {font

‐ size:10.0pt;}

_filtered #yiv2572859877 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}

#yiv2572859877 div.yiv2572859877WordSection1 {}

#yiv2572859877

Rena,

Thank you for talking with me and for2 all the information. It would be helpful if you could let Terry Knight at Ute Mountain know about our efforts to contact

his office.

Feel free to contact me.

Thanks.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415

‐ 947

‐ 4156

Fax: 415

‐ 947

‐ 3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

From: Kelly,

Shaheerah

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:36 AM

To: 'dinetahdoo@yahoo.com'

Subject: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

Hi Rena,

Below is my contact

information, including my mailing address.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR

‐ 3)

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 93 San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415

‐ 947

‐ 4156

Fax: 415

‐ 947

‐ 3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 58

Relating to the retirement of Barry J. Wolk.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 4, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relating to the retirement of Barry J. Wolk.

Whereas Barry J. Wolk will retire from service to the United

States Senate after twenty-four years as a member of the

staff of the Secretary of the Senate;

Whereas his hard work and dedication resulted in his appointment to the position of Director of Printing and

Document Services on November 16, 1996;

Whereas, as Director of Printing and Document Services, he

has executed the important duties and responsibilities of

his office with efficiency and constancy; and

Whereas Barry J. Wolk has demonstrated loyal devotion to

the United States Senate as an institution: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 58 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses its appreciation

2 to Barry J. Wolk for his years of faithful service to his

3 country and to the United States Senate.

4 SEC. 2. That the Secretary of the Senate shall trans5 mit a copy of this resolution to Barry J. Wolk.

Æ
#### Otis Lee FAIRLEY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57870.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 9, 1988.

Otis Lee Fairley, Parchman, pro se.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen., by Henry C. Clay, III, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Sunflower County; Arthur B. Clark, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ANDERSON and ZUCCARO, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Jarrett Lee WALL v. TULANE UNIVERSITY, the Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund, et al.

No. 86-C-2489.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Wall, Jarrett Lee; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5257; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E”, No. 84-12433.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 375.

Denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42


                               M E M O R A N D U M



TO:               C. Boyd Clarke

FROM:             H. Charles Ford

RE:               Severance Arrangement

DATE:             March 4, 1997

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This will confirm the arrangement between you and U.S. Bioscience, Inc. (the
"Company") whereby you will receive a severance payment equal to the amount of
your annual salary (exclusive of bonus) in the event of your involuntary
termination by the Company for any reason other than serious misconduct (which
is defined for this purpose as fraud, embezzlement, excessive unauthorized
absences, or other serious acts of impropriety). If such an involuntary
termination occurs, the Company will continue to provide medical coverage for
you for one year following such termination and your then-outstanding stock
options will continue to vest and remain exercisable during such one-year
period.


                                                 H.C.F.
Order entered April 18 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00415

- CV

IN RE CURTIS LEE SHE PPARD, JR., Relator

On Appeal from the 78th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48,429

- B



### O RDER

Bas ed on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus . We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-1189
DONALD F. KING, Trustee, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MOHAMMAD ALGHANEM; MANAL ABOKWIDIR, Defendants - Appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-03-1112-A) Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 27, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mohammad Alghanem, Manal Abokwidir, Appellants Pro Se. James Walter Reynolds, Heather Dawn Dawson, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mohammad Alghanem and Manal Abokwidir, husband and wife, appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order setting aside the transfer of Alghanem’s property, from Alghanem to himself and his wife, as a fraudulent conveyance under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Alghanem , No. CA-03-1112-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6723

VERNON SAMUEL BROWN, a/k/a Vernon S. Brown,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DANNY DUNBAR; SGT. ANGLA COLLINS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(9:09-cv-00920-RBH-BM)

Submitted: December 22, 2010 Decided: January 12, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vernon Samuel Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, 

Jr., GRIFFITH & SADLER, P.A., Beaufort, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vernon Samuel Brown appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2010). The 

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised 

Brown that failure to file timely objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a 

magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve 

appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when 

the parties have been warned of the consequences of 

noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th 

Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Brown 

has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after 

receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of 

the district court.

We deny as moot appellees’ motion to dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19745]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Angstrom Microsystems Corp., Bedminster National Corp., Brake 
Headquarters U.S.A., Inc., and BrandPartners Group, Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

March 29, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Angstrom Microsystems Corp. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Bedminster National Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Brake Headquarters U.S.A., Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended September 30, 1998.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
BrandPartners Group, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended September 30, 2009.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 29, 2012, and terminating at 
11:59 p.m. EDT on April 12, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7943 Filed 3-29-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**Exhibit 31.04**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Vincent Pilette, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of Symantec Corporation; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
|   | /s/ Vincent Pilette                                      |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Vincent   Pilette**                                    |
|   | *Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Date: July 25, 2019

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William Brett THRASH.

No. 87-KK-2769.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Thrash, William Brett; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 52564; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19680-KW.

Granted and remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider in light of *State v. Rowell,*517 So.2d 799 (La.1987).
H. Con. Res. 130 Agreed to November 9, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICANS IN CONGRESS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The book entitled ‘‘Asian and Pacific Islander

Americans in Congress’’, prepared by the Library of Congress under

the direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed

as a House document.

(b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The House document described in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and shall be in the style,

form, manner, and binding as directed by the Joint Committee

on Printing.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

In addition to the usual number of copies, there shall be printed

the lesser of—

(1) 30,700 copies of the document described in subsection

(a) of section 1, of which—

(A) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on

House Administration of the House of Representatives; and

(B) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on

Rules and Administration of the Senate; or

(2) such number of copies of the document described in

subsection (a) of section 1 as does not exceed a total production

and printing cost of $220,000, which copies shall be for the

use of the Committee on House Administration of the House
H. Con. Res. 130—2

of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and Administration of the Senate in the same proportions as described

in paragraph (1).

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50088

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Raudel Salgado-Rodriguez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CR-303-2

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Raudel Salgado-Rodriguez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to 

transport illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) and 

(B)(i). He contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying 

his request for a jury instruction on the defense of withdrawal from the 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50088 Document: 00516099691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
No. 21-50088

2

conspiracy. He asserts that his recorded interview supported a finding that 

he withdrew before his wife transported the aliens because he told her he did 

not want to be involved and she transported the aliens by herself as a result. 

According to Salgado-Rodriguez, the district court improperly weighed the 

credibility of that evidence by describing it as self-serving. He contends that 

the court was required instead to view the evidence in his favor and that the 

jury should have been allowed decide the question. The Government 

responds that withdrawal is not a defense to a Section 1324 conspiracy and, 

in the alternative, that Salgado-Rodriguez was not factually entitled to a 

withdrawal instruction. We review for abuse of discretion. See United States 

v. Branch, 91 F.3d 699, 711 (5th Cir. 1996).

We agree with the Government’s alternative contention that, 

regardless of whether the defense was available, the district court did not 

abuse its discretion because the evidence did not support a finding that 

Salgado-Rodriguez withdrew from the conspiracy before any overt act was 

committed. See United States v. Salazar, 751 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir. 2014). 

Nor did it support a finding that he completely withdrew. See United States 

v. Hoffman, 901 F.3d 523, 545 (5th Cir. 2018). Accordingly, a reasonable jury 

could not have found that he was entitled to the defense, and the district court 

did not abuse its discretion in declining to issue the requested instruction. 

See United States v. Arellano-Banuelos, 927 F.3d 355, 364 (5th Cir. 2019).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50088 Document: 00516099691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
#### David ROSS v. George WHITFIELD, Administrator, Louisiana Office of Employment Security and Westin Canal Place.

No. 87-CD-1812.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 10, 1988.

Rehearing Granted April 4, 1988.

David H. Williams, Mark A. Moreau, Mary Ellen Roy, New Orleans, New Orleans Legal Asst. Corp., for appellant.

Andrew P. Burnside, McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn & Ridley, New Orleans, Denise Nagel, Baton Rouge, Office of Employment Security, for appellee.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Kendall L. Vick, and Lois C. Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., New Orleans, for intervenor.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons assigned in *Toney v. Whitfield,*519 So.2d 251 (La.1988), decided this date, the judgment of the district court is modified to declare the unconstitutionality only of the penalty portion of La.R.S. 23:1634 A. As modified, the judgment is affirmed.

DIXON and DENNIS, JJ., dissent.

WATSON, J., dissents for reasons assigned in *Toney.*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

717 

CA 13-02187 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF LISA DIFRANCESCO, KELLY EARNST, 

BRENDA HIGGINS, MICHAEL JANOWSKY, MICHELLE 

MARASCHIELLO AND RAYMOND YUREK, 

PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V ORDER

COUNTY OF NIAGARA, JAMES R. VOUTOUR, AS SHERIFF 

OF COUNTY OF NIAGARA, CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA, 

NIAGARA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION, 

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, 

ET AL., RESPONDENTS. 

 

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLEY S. BRAUN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS COUNTY OF NIAGARA AND JAMES R.

VOUTOUR, AS SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF NIAGARA. 

SHAWN P. NICKERSON, CITY ATTORNEY, NORTH TONAWANDA, FOR

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT CITY OF NORTH TONAWANDA. 

LAW OFFICES OF W. JAMES SCHWAN, BUFFALO (W. JAMES SCHWAN OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT NIAGARA COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF’S ASSOCIATION. 

REDEN & O’DONNELL, LLP, BUFFALO (TERRY M. SUGRUE OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeals from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered February 28,

2013 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment

granted the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), notice is hereby given of the following meeting:

*Name:*                         National Advisory Council on Migrant Health.                    

*Dates and Times:*                         May 7, 2012, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., May 8, 2012, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Westin Denver Downtown Hotel, 1672 Lawrence Street, Denver, Colorado 80202.                         *Telephone:*                         (303) 572-9100.                    

*Fax:*                         (303) 572-7288.                    

*Status:*                         The meeting will be open to the public.                    

*Purpose:*                         The purpose of the meeting is to discuss services and issues related to the health of migrant and seasonal farmworkers and their families and to formulate recommendations for the Secretary of Health and Human Services.                    

*Agenda:*                         The agenda includes an overview of the National Advisory Council on Migrant Health's (The Council) general business activities. The Council will also hear presentations from experts on farmworker                               ( print page 19295)                            issues, including the status of farmworker health at the local and national levels. Agenda items are subject to change as priorities indicate.                    

*For Further Information Contact:*                         Gladys Cate, Office of Special Population Health, Bureau of Primary Health Care, Health Resources and Services Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15-62, Rockville, Maryland 20857; telephone (301) 594-0367.                    

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Reva Harris,

Acting Director, Division of Policy and Information Coordination.

[FR Doc. 2012-7613 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P