alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Re: EPA's GHG Final Rule Ed Nam to: William Charmley, Antonio Fernandez, Brian Nelson, Karl Simon 03/24/2010 03:32 PM Cc: Robin Moran, Roberts French
I'm ok with this but it might need some more detail, plus karl might have something to say. It's similar to an idea we had earlier which was to do a tech amendment if a new test procedure was complete before the next rule. But couldn't we just do the tech amendment as part of the next rule anyway? This makes this change moot.
Ed William Charmley ----- Original Message ----- **From:** William Charmley **Sent:** 03/24/2010 03:12 PM EDT **To:** Ed Nam; Antonio Fernandez; Brian Nelson **Cc:** Robin Moran; Roberts French **Subject:** Fw: EPA's GHG Final Rule Ed - what do we think of this suggestion from Frank Krich at Chrysler?

----- Forwarded by William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US on 03/24/2010 03:11 PM -----

From: fak6@chrysler.com To: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/24/2010 03:07 PM Subject: EPA's GHG Final Rule

Bill,
The purpose of this e-mail is to follow-up on my voice mail to you today. It would be appreciated if you could include the following statement with regard to the idle test in the GHG final rule. I know this is at the 11th hour but hopefully this minor change can still be incorporated before the rule is signed by the EPA Administrator on March 31 or April 1, 2010. The Alliance comments stated that we would work with EPA to develop an alternative method. The suggested statement below would provide flexibility in the event that an acceptable alternative is developed for the idle test without requiring a rulemaking. I view this as a win-win for EPA and the manufacturers should this happen. EPA has the authority to accept or reject the alternative. Here is my suggested wording. Thanks for you consideration.
"A manufacturer may request Administrator approval to use an alternative test procedure or methodology" or words to that effect.
Best regards,

Frank A. Krich Senior Planning Engineer Chrysler Group LLC CIMS 482-00-71 800 Chrysler DriveA uburn Hills, Michi g an 48326-2757 E-mail: fak6@chrysler.com Phone: (248) 576-5497 Fax: (248) 576-7928
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert M. Blodgett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/
      Robert M. Blodgett


Name:
      Robert M. Blodgett


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


Date:  February
      13, 2007
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TOMMY ADAMS, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell , Chief District Judge. ( 4:18

- cr - 00520

- RBH

- 1 )

Submitted : February 17, 2022 Decided: February 22, 2022

Before AGEE and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tommy Adams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tommy Adams, Jr. , appeals the district co urt’s text order denying his second motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), denying his motion for
reconsideration of the denial of his first compassionate release motion , and denying his motion to appoint counsel

. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Adam s ’ informal brief does not challenge
the bas e s for the district court’s disposition s , he has forfeited appellate review of the district
court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brie f.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
NJDEP 126 Petition of 9/17/10 Final Rule: Air Quality Modeling Data DVD 

EPA has placed in the docket a DVD containing certain air quality modeling data files that were 

used for the NJDEP 126 petition final rule 

Information on the air quality modeling performed in support of this final rule, including a 

summary of the model inputs and results, can be found in the final rule Air Quality Modeling 

Technical Support Document (final rule Modeling TSD) that is located in the NJDEP 126 

Petition docket. 

The following information is contained on this data DVD: 

I. AERMET meteorological preprocessor files 

a. AERMET runstream files for Portland Plant site-specific meteorological 

data with adjusted measurement heights 

b. Raw upper air, NWS surface, and Portland Plant site-specific meteorological 

input files 

c. AERMET surface and profile output files (for input to AERMOD) 

d. AERMET input and output files for tests without height adjustments 

e. AERMET input and output files for tests without SODAR sigma-w 

f. AERMET input and output files for tests without height adjustments and 

without SODAR sigma-w 

g. AERMET input and output files for tests with winter snow cover 

characteristics 

h. AERMET input and output files for tests with NJDEP surface characteristics 

i. AERMET input and output files for met variability analyses 

II. AERMAP terrain preprocessor files 

a. AERMAP runstream files for initial coarse receptor grid and fine receptor 

grid 

b. Raw NED terrain input data file 

c. AERMAP receptor output files with receptor elevations and hill height scales 

for initial coarse receptor grid and fine receptor grid (for input to 

AERMOD) 

III. Ambient SO2 data for Chester, NJ monitor for 2007-2009 used for determining 

monitored background concentrations for cumulative modeling analyses 

IV. AERMOD model files 

a. AERMOD input and output files for initial coarse receptor grid analysis 

b. AERMOD input and output files for fine receptor grid analysis 

c. AERMOD input and output files for fine receptor grid analysis with remedy 

d. AERMOD input and output files for tests without height adjustments 

e. AERMOD input and output files for tests without SODAR sigma-w 

f. AERMOD input and output files for tests without height adjustments and 

without SODAR sigma-w 

g. AERMOD input and output files for tests with winter snow cover 

characteristics 
h. AERMOD input and output files for tests with NJDEP surface 

characteristics 

i. AERMOD input and output files for load analyses 

j. AERMOD input and output files for met variability analyses 

k. AERMOD input and output files for tests with Columbia Monitor 

V. CALPUFF model output files 

a. CALPUFF model files for tests with Columbia Monitor 

b. CALPUFF model files for tests with PRIME option for validation study 

Requests for electronic copies of the NJDEP 126 Petition air quality modeling data should be 

sent to Roger Brode (brode.roger@epa.gov) or Brian Timin (timin.brian@epa.gov).
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 381

Designating October 16, 2000, to October 20, 2000, as ‘‘National Teach

For America Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. SCHUMER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating October 16, 2000, to October 20, 2000, as

‘‘National Teach For America Week’’.

Whereas while the United States will need to hire over

2,000,000 new teachers over the next decade, Teach For

America has proven itself an effective alternative means

of recruiting gifted college graduates into the field of

education;

Whereas in its decade of existence, Teach For America’s

6,000 corps members have aided 1,000,000 low-income

students at urban and rural sites across the United

States;

Whereas Teach For America’s popularity continues to skyrocket, with a record-breaking number of men and

women applying to become corps members for the 2000-

2001 school year;
2

•SRES 381 ATS

Whereas over half of all Teach For America alumni continue

to work within the field of education after their two years

of service are complete;

Whereas Teach For America corps members leave their service committed to life-long advocacy for low-income, underserved children;

Whereas over 100,000 schoolchildren are being taught by

Teach For America corps members in 2000; and

Whereas October 16th through 20th will be Teach For America’s fourth annual ‘‘Teach For America’’ week, during

which government members, artists, historians, athletes,

and other prominent community leaders will visit underserved classrooms served by Teach For America corps

members: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends the Teach For America program,

3 and its past and present participants, for its con4 tribution to our Nation’s public school system;

5 (2) designates the week beginning on October

6 16, 2000, and ending on October 20, 2000, as ‘‘Na7 tional Teach For America Week’’; and

8 (3) encourages Senators and all community

9 leaders to participate in classroom visits to take

10 place during the week.

Æ
#### In re the MARRIAGE OF Terry Grace BURKE, n/k/a Terry Grace Sedam, Appellant, and William Dennis Burke, Appellee.

No. 83CA0129.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

March 22, 1984.

*1339C.J. Berardini, P.C., C.J. Berardini, Denver, for appellant.

Patrick L. Dulaney, P.C., Patrick L. Du-laney, Aurora, for appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Wife seeks to reverse the order of the trial court denying her motion for a judgment for arrearages for spousal maintenance allegedly due pursuant to temporary orders. The wife’s motion was filed several months after the entry by the trial court of the decree of dissolution including permanent orders, and was denied by the trial court on the ground that the matter had been “taken into consideration in [permanent] orders.” The record does not support the arguments made by wife, and we therefore affirm.

The temporary order on which the wife’s claim is based consists solely of one paragraph in the reporter’s transcript of proceedings held on November 25, 1980, before the referee in which the referee stated:

> “It will be the *recommendation*of the referee that the Respondent pay as temporary maintenance for the Petitioner the sum of $300 per month, payable on the 15th and the last day of each month, commencing November 30, 1980 through the registry of the Court.” (emphasis supplied)

This transcript is not signed by the referee; there is in the record no separate “order” signed by the referee or by the court; and, there is nothing in the register of actions to indicate that the referee’s recommendation was approved by the court or became the order of the court. We conclude that there was no enforceable temporary order entered in the trial court. *See In re Marriage of Debreceni,*663 P.2d 1062 (Colo.App.1983). Accordingly, there was nothing on which to base a judgment for arrearages.

The judgment is affirmed.

BERMAN and BABCOCK, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of El Pollo Loco,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Stein, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Joseph Stein                                                
|Joseph Stein                                                    
|Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|El Pollo Loco, Inc.                                             
|May 13, 2005                                                    



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Pollo Loco, Inc. and will be retained by El Pollo Loco, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2

|             1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Neurogen      Corporation; |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|             2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | Neurogen      Corporation |                                                                       |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                      |                                                                       |   |
| Date:       April 30, 2009 | By:                       | /s/ Thomas      A. Pitler                                             |   |
|                            |                      | Name:      Thomas A. Pitler                                                |   |
|                            |                      | Title:      Senior Vice President and Cheif Business and Financial Officer |   |
|                            |                      |                                                                       |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1747

WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

RICHARD J. KANIA, Substitute Trustee,

Party in Interest,

v.

JAMES ROBERT ELLISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:07-cv-00018-WLO)

Submitted: February 25, 2008 Decided: March 4, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Robert Ellison, Appellant Pro Se. Sean M. Corcoran,

Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Robert Ellison appeals a district court order

denying his motion to reconsider the order remanding his case to

state court. The court remanded the case to state court because of

a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. As a result, the district

court did not have jurisdiction to consider Ellison’s motion to

reconsider. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 734-35 (4th Cir. 1996).

Accordingly, because the court lacked jurisdiction to

consider Ellison’s motion to reconsider, we dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Use of combined cycle for peaking service for PPEC

Steve Hill to: Gerardo Rios, Roger Kohn 03/16/2012 09:28 AM

Cc:

Dave Jenkins, "grchandler@apexpowergroup.com", Craig 

Kebodeaux, "McKinsey, John A." , Gary Rubenstein

History: This message has been forwarded.

As requested by EPA, PPEC is providing the attached letter from Kiewit Power, which provides a 

comparison between PPEC’s proposed turbine configuration and a combined cycle facility of comparable 

capacity. This letter is provided as an addition to the record supporting PPEC’s PSD permit application.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Steve HillKiewit Power - Mr Gerardo Rios - 3-16-2012 re Pio Pico Energy Center.pdf
Exhibit
        10.1

       

      STATE
        OF DELAWARE

      CERTIFICATE
        OF AMENDMENT

      TO
        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 

       

      Teton
        Petroleum Company (the “Corporation”), a corporation duly organized and existing
        under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
        (the
“Law”), hereby changes its name to “Teton Energy Corporation” (the “Name
        Change”) by the filing of this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of
        Incorporation. The Name Change was duly adopted in accordance with the
        provisions of Section 242 of the Law as set forth below. The Corporation
        

       

      DOES
        HEREBY CERTIFY: 

       

      FIRST:
        That at
        a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation, resolutions were
        duly
        adopted setting forth a proposed amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Certificate
        of Incorporation of the Corporation to change the Corporation’s name to “Teton
        Energy Corporation” Such resolutions declared the Name Change and the Amendment
        to be advisable, recommended the Name Change and the Amendment to the
        stockholders of the Corporation and called a meeting of the stockholders
        of the
        Corporation for consideration thereof. 

       

      SECOND:
        That
        thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, an annual meeting
        of the stockholders of the Corporation was duly called and held upon notice
        in
        accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
        State of
        Delaware, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by
        statute
        were voted in favor of the Name Change and the Amendment. 

       

      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF,
        said
        Teton Petroleum Company has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed
        by
        Karl F. Arleth, its President, this 28th
        day
        of June, 2005. 

       

      
        	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                TETON
                  PETROLEUM COMPANY (now known as TETON ENERGY CORPORATION), a Delaware
                  corporation

              
	
                 

                 

              	
                 

                 

              	
                 

                BY:

              	
                 

                 

              
	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 /s/
Karl
                F. Arleth
	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                TITLE:

              	
                 President

              
	
                 

              	
                 

              	
                 

              	 
	 	 	
                NAME:

              	
                Karl
                  F. Arleth
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO DEBENTURE


 


This Amendment No. 3 to Debenture (this “Amendment”)
dated this 10th day of December, 2020, by and among Bespoke Extracts, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and
Berique Labs LLC (the “Holder”).


 


WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of an
outstanding original issue discount convertible debenture of the Company, in the outstanding principal amount of $400,000, with
an original issue date of December 24, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, dated May 28, 2020, and Amendment No. 2 thereto,
dated August 21, 2020 (as amended, the “Debenture”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire
to amend the Debenture as more particularly set forth below;


 


WHEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree as
follows:


 


1. The Maturity Date
of the Debenture is hereby amended to be February 28, 2021. For the avoidance of doubt, no default will be deemed to have occurred,
and no default interest will be deemed to have accrued or be owed, since the original issuance of the Debenture to the date of
this Amendment.


 


2. Except as modified
herein, the terms of the Debenture shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3. This Amendment may
be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding
upon all parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. A
signature delivered by facsimile or email shall constitute an original.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


BESPOKE EXTRACTS, INC.


 


	By:	/s/ Danil Pollack	 
	Name:	Danil Pollack	 
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer	 


 


BERIQUE LABS LLC


 


	By:	/s/ Ber Mitchell	 
	Name:	Ber Mitchell 	 
	Title:	Owner
#### U-SERVE PETROLEUM AND INVESTMENTS INC. v. Charles C. CAMBRE, Jr., d/b/a Stop and Shop, Bobbie Joe Moreau, et al.

No. 86-C-0997.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Moreau, Bobbie Joe; applying for reconsideration of the June 13, 1986 denial of writ of certiorari/review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 84 CA 1394; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. A, No. 37824.

Prior report: La.App., 486 So.2d 821.

Not considered. The judgment is definitive. C.C.P. art. 2166.