alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 14

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part

of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the

Holocaust.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 30, 2001

Mr. NEY (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. FATTAH,

Mr. EHLERS, Mr. LINDER, Mr. GILMAN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr.

LATOURETTE, Mr. FROST, Mr. CANNON, Mr. DAVIS of Florida, and Mr.

CANTOR) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on April 18, 2001, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony

6 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

7 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Æ
#### Solfanelli, Appellant, *v.*Archbald Borough.

Argued March 6, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Woodside, J., absent).

Before Nealon, J., without a jury.

*Gerald G.*Dolphin, for appellant.

*George A.*Yavorek, for appellee.

March 21, 1962:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The six judges who heard the argument in this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment is affirmed.
#### Christopher N. SARGENT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 81911.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Jan. 13, 1994.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Sophia Ehringer, Asst. Public Defender, Seventh Judicial Circuit, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the district court of appeal in *State v. Sargent,*617 So.2d 1115 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). *848We have jurisdiction under article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.

Our recent decision in *Munoz v. State,*629 So.2d 90 (Fla.1993), resolved the issue presented in this case. On the authority of *Munoz,*the decision under review is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.
canada1r 

challenqer 

TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS 

PSP 605 

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5-157 

INSERT IN SECTION 5-10-30 

FACING PAGE 48 

To revise the interval and add a PHASE-IN rule for task 57-40-00-160* (Outboard Flap - Hinge Box Forward 

Lugs). 

 57 -40-00-160* with the task that follows: 

ecord the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS 

nd the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication . 

TR 5-157 

Page 1 of 2 

Jul 08/2013 
canada1r 

challenqer 

TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS 

PSP 605 

CHAPTER 57 CHECKS 

DESCRIPTION 

board Flap - Hinge Box Forward Lugs. 

OT Check. 

Ref. PSP 612, Part 6, ET -57-40-10, Part B) 

HASE-IN: For aircraft with more than 7500 Landings but not 

more than 11350 Landings at the date of this 

Temporary Revision, do this check within 500 

Landings but not later than 11600 Landings. 

For aircraft with more than 11350 Landings at the 

date of this Temporary Revision, do this check 

within the next 250 Landings. 

CHECK 

INTERVAL 

8000 T 

LANDINGS 

3600 R 

LANDINGS 

See NOTE 

ZONE · 

584 

684 

ACCESS 

581-BB -DB -FB 584-BB -DB -FB 

681-BB -DB -FB 

684-BB -DB -FB 

TR 5-157 

Page 2 of 2 

Jul 08/2013
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CARLTON McMANUS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00312

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court Number Four

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# CR

- 2010

- 05274

- D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, a nd Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Avado Brands,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year ended  December  29,  2002,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  ("Report"),  each of the
undersigned  officers of the Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  February 28, 2003                  /s/ Tom E. DuPree, Jr.
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Tom E. DuPree, Jr.
                                          Chairman of the Board and
                                          Chief Executive Officer




Date:  February 28, 2003                  /s/ Louis J. Profumo
                                          ---------------------------
                                          Louis J. Profumo
                                          Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Treasurer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00397-CV

BETTY JANE GOSSETT,

Appellant

v.

THE ESTATE OF DONA LEE STOVALL, 

DECEASED, AND LISA JAMIESON AS THE 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF DONA LEE STOVALL,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 2

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. P200719377-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Clerk of the Court notified the parties in an August 3, 2016 letter that the 

appellant must provide a written status report within seven days or the appeal would be 

dismissed for want of prosecution without further notice. A status report has not been 

filed. 
Betty Jane Gossett v. The Estate of Dona Lee Stovall, Deceased Page 2

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(b). 

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 17, 2016

[CV06]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 251 Agreed to House (ATH)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 251

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2001

  Mr. Armey submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Wednesday, 
October 17, 2001, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
October 23, 2001, for morning hour debate, or until Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the Senate recesses 
or adjourns at the close of business on Wednesday, October 17, 2001, or 
Thursday, October 18, 2001, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until 10 a.m. on Tuesday, October 23, 2001, or at 
such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader 
or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until Members 
are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority Leader of the 
Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the House and the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the 
Members of the House and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble at 
such place and time as they may designate whenever, in their opinion, 
the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 18946-1-II.

Division Two.

August 2, 1996.]

#### John Schrader, *Appellant,*v. Grange Insurance Association, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-2-05746-1, Frederick B. Hayes, J., entered December 2, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Turner, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Armstrong, JJ. Now published at 83 Wn. App. 662.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Ames, Appellant.

(No. 31301

Decided February 25, 1948.)

*Mr. Mathias H. Heck,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. William H. Wolff*and *Mr. Robert W. Schroader,*for appellee.

*Mr. Herbert M. Eikenbary,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason ' that no debatable constitutional question is-involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart,, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

July 23, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Paul L. Gretch 

Director, Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Brazil Gateway-Restricted Combination Frequencies 

Docket DOT-OST-2008-0227 

 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

By Notice of Action Taken dated August 8, 2008, in Docket OST-2008-0227, Delta was 

allocated eleven gateway-restricted frequencies for U.S.-Brazil combination services. Delta 

subsequently returned one gateway-restricted frequency, leaving it with ten frequencies. 

On September 6, 2010, Delta will be ending service at Fortaleza, Brazil. Accordingly, Delta 

hereby returns three of its ten remaining gateway-restricted U.S.-Brazil frequency to the 

Department’s unallocated pool effective on September 7, 2010. After the return of these three 

frequencies, Delta will continue to hold seven gateway-restricted frequencies. 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: carl.nelson@aa.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; 

hkamen@coair.com; dan.weiss@coair.com; rbkeiner@crowell.com; 

jeffrey.manley@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com; robert.land@jetblue.com; 

jhill@dlalaw.com; dkirstein@yklaw.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; esta.rosenberg@dot.gov;; 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov; byerlyjr@state.gov; john.allen@faa.gov; Emily.Neuberger@wcaa.us; 

Joe.Cambron@wcaa.us; mgoldman@sgbdc.com; info@airlineinfo.com
##### 



SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
AMH HOLDINGS, INC.
 Corporation
  DGCL Restated Certificate of Incorporation Existing Charter
     DGCL
  Authorized Capital Stock
    -30-




---



##### 



Common Stock
 Dividends
 Liquidation
 Voting
       -31-




---



##### 



Harvest Investcorp Related Person
 -32-




---



##### 



provided however
    AMH HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayName:
    
    D. Keith LaVanwayTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 -33-
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jeffery W.Sprick, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Mueller Group, Inc.;

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         [Reserved]

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 2,2006
|        |   | /s/ JEFFERY W. SPRICK                                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Jeffery W. Sprick  Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 55 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Senate and House of 
Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives 
at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on the fifth day of January, 
2001, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. 
Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and 
two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be 
handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the 
certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral 
votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and 
acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the 
letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence 
and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they 
shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been 
ascertained and counted in the manner and according to the rules by law 
provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of 
the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which 
announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, 
if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, 
together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the 
two Houses.

            Passed the Senate October 24 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 55

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

      To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 9, 2010

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS Thomas T. Higgins Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


This
certification is being furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated into any document
for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER D. BURGESS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 177 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
#### Frederick William FREY, a/k/a William Frederick Frey, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-0710.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

May 14, 1986.

Frederick William Frey, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary dismissal of appellant’s application for post-conviction relief. In addition to numerous procedural defects the motion contains allegations of trial errors that cannot be raised in a motion for post-conviction relief because they could and should have been raised in appellant’s prior appeal on the merits. The same is true of appellant’s claim that he was improperly sentenced, a claim actually raised and rejected in appellant’s prior appeal.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 124

Promoting national unity and family renewal.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 3, 2001

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. ARMEY, Mr. RUSH, Mr.

SHAW, Mr. TERRY, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. RYUN of Kansas) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Promoting national unity and family renewal.

Whereas the unity of the people of the United States is essential to achieve harmony and prosperity for all the families of the United States;

Whereas the people of the United States have traditionally

observed a firm reliance on God;

Whereas the first amendment of the Constitution guarantees

the right of all citizens of the United States to freely exercise their religious faith;

Whereas the United States has been blessed during its history with some leaders who espoused a reverence for God,

the dream of interracial harmony, and religiously inspired

moral values;
2

•HCON 124 IH

Whereas these religiously inspired moral values have enabled

the people of the United States, regardless of faith, race,

or national origin, to foster our shared ideal to become

one nation under God;

Whereas these religiously inspired moral values have served

as the cornerstone for maintaining strong, cohesive, and

productive families; and

Whereas it is incumbent on the religious, political, and community leaders of the United States to set an example of

unity and reconciliation in order to restore civic peace

and harmony among all the people of the United States:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) there should be established a Year for Na4 tional Unity and Family Renewal to invoke the

5 intercession of Almighty God to bring about national

6 unity, national reconciliation, and family renewal in

7 the new millennium; and

8 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

9 calling on the people of the United States and inter10 ested organizations to observe such a year with ap11 propriate programs and activities, including religious

12 observances and the sponsorship of civic initiatives.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of GM Financial Consumer Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-3  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  The Bank of New York Mellon.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 4, 2024