Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Notices 18861 

raised by the complaint or 

complainant’s filing under section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.8(b)). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

James R. Holbein, Secretary to the 

Commission, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2000. The public version of the 

complaint can be accessed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure filed on behalf 

of Pragmatus AV, LLC on March 13, 

2012. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1337) in the importation into 

the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain consumer electronics, including 

mobile phones and tablets. The 

complaint names as respondents 

ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. of Taiwan; 

ASUS Computer International, Inc. of 

CA; HTC Corporation of Taiwan; HTC 

America, Inc. of WA; LG Electronics, 

Inc. of South Korea; LG Electronics 

U.S.A., Inc. of NJ; LG Electronics 

MobileComm U.S.A, Inc. of CA; Pantech 

Co., Ltd. of South Korea; Pantech 

Wireless, Inc. of GA; Research In Motion 

Ltd. of Canada; Research In Motion 

Corp. of TX; Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd. of South Korea; Samsung 

Electronics America, Inc. of NJ; and 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

LLC of TX. 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments 

should address whether issuance of the 

relief specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2885’’) 

in a prominent place on the cover page 

and/or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, http:// 

www.usitc.gov/secretary/ 

fed_reg_notices/rules/ 

handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). 

Persons with questions regarding filing 

should contact the Secretary (202–205– 

2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary and on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 13, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7474 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–678, 679, 681, 

and 682 (Third Review)] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil, India, 

Japan, and Spain; Scheduling of 

Expedited Five-Year Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders on stainless steel bar from 

Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nathanael Comly (202–205–3174), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
18862 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by domestic producers Carpenter 

Technology Corporation, Crucible Industries, LLC, 

Electralloy a G.O. Carlson Inc. Co., Universal 

Stainless & Alloy Products, Inc., and Valbruna 

Slater Stainless, Inc. to be individually adequate. 

Comments from other interested parties will not be 

accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

1The motions were titled ‘‘Motion for 

Reconsideration—Opposition for Summary 

Disposition’’ and ‘‘Amended Motion for 

Reconsideration—Exceptions to Order of Summary 

Disposition.’’ 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On March 5, 2012, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (76 

FR 74807, December 1, 2011) of the 

subject five-year reviews was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on May 

8, 2012, and made available to persons 

on the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for these reviews. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determinations 

the Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

May 11, 2012 and may not contain new 

factual information. Any person that is 

neither a party to the five-year reviews 

nor an interested party may submit a 

brief written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the reviews by May 11, 

2012. However, should the Department 

of Commerce extend the time limit for 

its completion of the final results of its 

reviews, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. Please be aware that the 

Commission’s rules with respect to 

electronic filing have been amended. 

The amendments took effect on 

November 7, 2011. See 76 FR 61937 

(Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly revised 

Commission’s Handbook on E-Filing, 

available on the Commission’s Web site 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the reviews must be 

served on all other parties to the reviews 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the reviews period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of the 

Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published 

pursuant to section 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 22, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7345 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 332–524] 

Brazil: Competitive Factors Affecting 

U.S. and Brazilian Agricultural Sales in 

Selected Third Country Markets 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Extension of date for 

transmitting report. 

SUMMARY: Following the receipt of a 

letter on March 22, 2012, from the 

Committee on Finance of the United 

States Senate (Committee), the 

Commission has extended to April 26, 

2012, the date for transmitting its report 

to the Committee in investigation No. 

332–524, Brazil: Competitive Factors In 

Brazil Affecting U.S. and Brazilian 

Agricultural Sales in Selected Third 

Country Markets. 

DATES: 

March 22, 2012: Receipt of the letter 

from the Committee. 

April 26, 2012: New date for 

transmitting the Commission’s report to 

the Committee. 

Backround 

The Commission published notice of 

institution of the investigation in the 

Federal Register on May 24, 2011 (76 

FR 30195). In its original notice of 

investigation, the Commission indicated 

that it would transmit its report to the 

Committee on March 26, 2012. The 

notice is also available on the 

Commission Web site at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. All other information 

about the investigation, including a 

description of the subject matter to be 

addressed, contact information, and 

Commission addresses, remains the 

same as in the original notice. The 

public record for this investigation may 

be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 23, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7472 Filed 3–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

[Docket No. 10–54] 

Zhiwei Lin, M.D.; Decision and Order 

On September 19, 2011, 

Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) 

Timothy D. Wing issued the attached 

recommended decision (also ALJ). 

Therein, the ALJ found that Respondent 

is currently without authority to 

dispense controlled substances in 

California, the State in which he 

practices medicine and holds his DEA 

Registration and therefore 

recommended that his registration be 

revoked. Thereafter, Respondent filed 

two motions 1 and the Government filed 

a response to the motions. Having 

reviewed the record in its entirety 

including the ALJ’s recommended 

decision and the various pleadings, I 

have decided to adopt the ALJ’s rulings, 

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES