alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 111

Commending the President for proclaiming May 6–12, 2001, as Global

Science and Technology Week.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Mr. BOEHLERT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Science

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commending the President for proclaiming May 6–12, 2001,

as Global Science and Technology Week.

Whereas science and technology hold the key to our future

economic prosperity;

Whereas in today’s era of globalization it is essential that

young people have access to high-quality science and

mathematics education so that America’s workforce may

continue to participate fully in the world’s high-technology marketplace and in the global scientific community;

Whereas the greatest challenges and brightest hopes our Nation faces are of global concern and science and mathematics education is essential for continued United States

leadership in the world;
2

•HCON 111 IH

Whereas science and mathematics education are essential for

continued leadership and participation by the United

States in international science ventures, such as the

Human Genome Project, which will lead to many scientific breakthroughs and medical discoveries that will

improve the lives of United States citizens;

Whereas educational programs must find ways of exciting

students about studying science and mathematics and igniting their curiosity by drawing attention to news-making scientific discoveries, and by emphasizing society’s increasing reliance on science and technology and the role

of science and technology in preventing human tragedies

around the globe;

Whereas, because the media focus on news about breakthroughs in genetic engineering, potential cancer drugs,

and deep space probes, and highlight breathtaking images from satellites, science and mathematics education

is needed to enable all Americans to understand and

evaluate today’s headlines; and

Whereas in the 21st century, competency in science and

mathematics is an essential component of responsible citizenship: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That science and technology are important

3 elements for our economic well-being, and therefore the

4 Congress commends the President in proclaiming a Global

5 Science and Technology Week.

Æ
#### The State, ex rel. Lane, *v.*Montgomery County Board of Elections. The State, ex rel. Haney et al., *v.*Montgomery County Board of Elections.

(Nos. 31437 and 31438

Decided April 29, 1948.)

*485
      *Messrs. Wilson & Rector,*for relators.

*Mr. Mathias H. Heck,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Albert J. Dwyer,*for respondent.

By the Court.

The parties are in accord that the petitions and declarations of candidacy as originally filed contained more than the five signatures permitted by Section 4785-70, General Code, that no protests were filed, that the relators each requested and directed the excess petition parts removed, that three members of the board of elections knew of such re*486moval by the other board member, that the board certified the petitions as valid, and that, thereafter, the board ordered the names of relators stricken from the ballot.

Counsel for respondent board contend the facts in these actions are similar to those in *State, ex rel. Burgstaller,*v. *Franklin County Board of Elections, ante,*193, 78 N. E. (2d), 352.

That case is readily distinguished from the present proceedings.

In the *Burgstaller case,*the nomination papers always bore more than five signatures, the relator made no attempt to remove any petition part, a protest was filed, a hearing was held, the board of elections rejected the nomination papers and the relator contended that the board should have selected one of his petition forms and regarded the others as surplusage.

In the present cases the original nomination papers of each relator bore more than five signatures, before the final filing date the excess petition parts were removed by the direction of the relators, no protests were filed, the board certified the nomination papers as valid and the board thereafter, without notice to relators but after a public hearing, found the relators had not qualified as candidates.

It is stated on page 196 of the *per curiam*opinion in the *Burgstaller case*that “the burden of complying with the statute rests on the candidate, and it is his duty to decide on which of several filed petition forms he will stand.” The relators in the present cases performed their duty of deciding on which petition forms to stand.

On the evening of February 4 at 6:30 o’clock, which was the final filing time, the relators’ petitions and declarations of candidacy complied with Section 4785-70, General Code, and on February 10 they were' de*487dared valid. It was not until approximately two months later that the board, without notice to relators, ordered their names stricken from the primary ballot.

It was the duty of the respondent hoard to place the names of the relators on the primary ballot and the hoard abused its discretion by ordering their names stricken therefrom.

The demurrers to the amended answers are sustained and, respondent not desiring to plead further, writs of mandamus will be issued as prayed for.

*Writs allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turnee, . Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
steam_record - Re: Plant ID's 06599 and 00664 Section 308 ICR Response Extension Request 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Eric Holder" <EHolder@indepmo.org> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Eric Holder" <EHolder@indepmo.org> 

Date: 06/28/2010 10:47AM 

cc: "Leon Daggett" <LDaggett@indepmo.org>, "Paul Mahlberg" <PMAHLBERG@indepmo.org> 

Subject: Plant ID's 06599 and 00664 Section 308 ICR Response Extension Request 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Eric Holder" <EHolder@indepmo.org>

Date: 6/28/2010 4:01 PM

Subject: Re: Plant ID's 06599 and 00664 Section 308 ICR Response Extension Request

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C74BD... 3/17/2011
** High Priority ** 

** Reply Requested When Convenient ** 

Ms. Alicea, 

Pursuant to your June 18, 2010 ICR Letter for our Missouri City (ID 06599) and 

Blue Valley (ID 00664) Power Plants, Independence Power & Light formally requests 

a 45 day extension to the response period (i.e., response would be due Tuesday 

November 2, 2010). The extension is necessary for the following reasons: 

1) We are a small, municipally-owned utility with limited resources; 

2) The amount of information requested is extensive requiring input from various 

departments; and, 

3) The standard response period occurs during the summer, our busiest time of 

year, when our limited staff is already booked. 

Thank you for your kind consideration of this extension request. 

Regards, 

Eric Holder 

Environmental Compliance Engineer 

Independence Power & Light 

21500 E. Truman Road 

Independence, MO 64051 

(816) 325-7455 off 

(816) 325-7474 fax 

(816) 365-2378 cell 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C74BD... 3/17/2011
Appendix	E

LandBros	Aerial	Photography,	L.L.C.

Phantom	Pilot	Training	Guide
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  November 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Cynthia L. SobeCynthia L. SobeVice President  Finance,
Interim Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 POLYPORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Polypore International, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 13, 2007
    /s/ Robert B. TothRobert B. TothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
[No. 18286-6-II.

Division Two.

June 28, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Timothy N. Kell, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 93-1-00733-4, James E. Warme, J., entered May 12, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, J., concurred in by Seinfeld, C.J., and Morgan, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000849101
<NAME>                        Avado Brands, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jan-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jan-03-1999
<CASH>                                               7,216
<SECURITIES>                                            27
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          8,599
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100,985
<PP&E>                                             367,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     670,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              239,118
<BONDS>                                            116,978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              115,000
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               405
<OTHER-SE>                                         111,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       670,597
<SALES>                                            862,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   862,692
<CGS>                                              241,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      740,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    107,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                        39,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 67,744
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                            1,461
<NET-INCOME>                                        66,283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.62
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Symmetry Medical Inc. (the Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



November 4, 2005



/s/ Brian MooreBrian MoorePresident and Chief Executive Officer




19
Exhibit 10.1


 


SUMMARY
OF MATERIAL MODIFICATION


for the


 


COAST
NATIONAL BANK 401 (K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN


 


DECEMBER 30, 2004


 


(1)                                  General. This is a Summary of
Material Modification regarding the COAST NATIONAL BANK 401 (K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN (“Plan”). This Summary of Material Modification supplements
the Summary Plan Description (“SPD”) dated December 17, 2002. You should
retain this document with your copy of the SPD.


 


(2)                                  Identification of Employer. The
legal name, address and Federal employer identification number of the Employer
are:


 


	
   

  	
  Coast National Bank

  
	
   

  	
  500 Marsh Street

  
	
   

  	
  San Luis Obispo, CA
  93401

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  EIN:

  	
  77-0440178

  	
   

  



 


(3)                                  Summary Description of Modification.
The Employer has amended the Plan in the following respect:


 


The Employer has
amended the definition of compensation to exclude Fringe Benefits, Bonuses and
Commissions.


 


(4)                                  Effect on SPD. This Summary amends
and updates the SPD.
#### Kassem and Wajeha SALEH v. Allen OLTMER, et al.

No. 88-CC-0353.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 2, 1988.

In re Saleh, Kassem; Saleh, Wajeha; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW88-0016; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 85-7653-1.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Shefali Vibhakar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Telesis Technology Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Telesis Technology Corporation.





/s/ Shefali Vibhakar

Shefali Vibhakar

Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2005.
Order entered January 14, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00813

- CV

EDWARD KELLY, EDWARD KELLY D/B/A KELLY P LUMBING & LEAK

DETECTION AND BRITTA NY KELLY, Appe llant s

V.

SANJAI R. ISAAC, M.D ., REBECCA ISAAC AND MERIDIAN REVOCABLE TRUST, BARBARA HEIDEN AND S HELLEY OLIVER AND BL AKE MYERS, Appellee s

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 007

- 01284

- 2017



### O RDER

Befo re the Court is appellees’ January 10, 2020 second unopposed motion to extend time

to file their brief. Appellees seek an extension of fifteen days. We GRANT the motion and

ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 27, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JU STICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-81,045]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on January 26, 2012, applicable to workers of Aerotek, Inc., working on-site at Dow Jones Corporation, Dow Jones Content Services Princeton, New Jersey. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production of digital newsletters. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 8, 2012 (77 FR 6590).                

At the request of the New Jersey State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that workers of the Princeton, New Jersey location of Dow Jones & Company, Dow Jones Content Services, including on-site workers from Aerotek were engaged in activities supporting the production of digital newsletters, both experienced worker separations during the relevant time period due to the shift in the production of digital newsletters to Sophia, Bulgaria.

Accordingly, the Department is amending the certification to include workers of the Princeton, New Jersey location of Dow Jones & Company, Inc., Dow Jones Content Services.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-81,045 is hereby issued as follows:

All workers from Dow Jones & Company, Inc., Dow Jones Content Services, including on-site workers from Aerotek, Princeton, New Jersey, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after February 13, 2010, through January 26, 2014, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1074, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 22nd day of March 2012.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-7795 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
[No. 19665-4-II.

Division Two.

August 2, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Roberto Gomez-Sanchez, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 95-1-00264-9, Milton R. Cox, J., entered June 27, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Houghton, A.C. J., concurred in by Morgan and Turner, JJ.