alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



I, Matthew L. Schissler, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





|                      |     |                         
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Matthew L. Schissler
|                      |     | Matthew L. Schissler    
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 184 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 184

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 24, 2001

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
            Providing for a National Day of Reconciliation.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That on a day of reconciliation selected jointly by the Speaker of the 
House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate, 
and with the

Chaplain of the House of Representatives and the Chaplain of the Senate 
in attendance--
            (1) the two Houses of the Congress shall assemble in the 
        Hall of the House of Representatives at a time when the two 
        Houses are not in session; and
            (2) during this assembly, the Members of the two Houses may 
        gather to humbly seek the blessings of Providence for 
        forgiveness, reconciliation, unity, and charity for all people 
        of the United States, thereby assisting the Nation to realize 
        its potential as the champion of hope, the vindicator of the 
        defenseless, and the guardian of freedom.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 23, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2010 

1018 

Order 

 

October 26, 2010 

140946 & (74) 

J. EDWARD KLOIAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 140946 

 COA: 287812 

Washtenaw CC: 84-028688-CK 

THOMAS VAN FOSSEN, Personal 

Representative of the Estate of William 

VanFossen, 

Defendant, Third-Party 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

and 

VICTOR T. WEBER, 

 Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, 

 Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 21, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Martinelli Unemployment Compensation Case.

*139Argued November 17, 1961.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Rhodes, P. J., absent).

*Bose K. Martinelli,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

January 16, 1962:

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Rose K. Martinelli was last employed by the Nor-Lee Company, Uniontown, Pennsylvania, as a sewing machine operator. Her final day of work was April 27, 1960, on which date she had a valid separation. On November 29, 1960, Mrs. Martinelli refused a referral to similar employment with the Gateway Manufacturing Company, Masontown, Pennsylvania. Her application for benefits was. disallowed by the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that she had failed without good cause to accept suitable work, and was therefore disqualified under the provisions of Section 402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of December 5,1936, P. L. [1937] 2897, 43 P.S. 751 et seq. This appeal followed.

*140The compensation authorities found on competent evidence that the proffered employment was suitable work at a comparable wage, that Masontown was within the Uniontown labor market area, and that claimant did not have good cause to refuse the referral. The position of claimant on this appeal is thus stated: “I refused to accept the work because I could not make out”. She argues that, after paying a baby sitter, transportation charges, and income tax, “it would not be worth it for me to go to work”. The record discloses that claimant “never worked outside of Uniontown”, and was “waiting to be called back at Nor-Lee”.

This appeal may be briefly disposed of by quoting the following statement from our opinion in *8parano Unemployment Compensation Case,*193 Pa. Superior Ct. 349, 165 A. 2d 131 (citations omitted) : “Although the principal objective of unemployment legislation is to alleviate economic distress in individual cases, sound policy requires that a claimant who refuses employment may remain eligible for benefits only where there is some necessitous and compelling reasons for the refusal of work ... A claimant who seeks benefits must at all times be ready and willing to accept suitable employment, and must have substantial and reasonable grounds for refusing offered work . . . Under the circumstances in the instant case, we are clearly of the opinion that the Board properly ruled that appellant was disqualified under Section 402(a) of the statute”.

Decision affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JESUS ALB ER TO R ODR IGUEZALVAR ADO, a .k.a . Je sus Albe R odrigue z -Alva

ra do, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10536

D.C . No. 2:14-c r-00634-GM S M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na G . M urray

Snow, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, B EA, a nd M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s. Je sus Albe rto R odrigue z -Alva ra do a p pe a ls from the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha l le nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 37-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry of a re m ove d a l ie n, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . 

# FIL ED JUL 28 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), R odrigue z -Alva

ra do’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f sta ting tha t the re are n o grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra wa s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d R odrigue z -Alva

ra do the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nt a l brie f. No pro sesupple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d
. R odrigue z -Alva

ra do wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his c onvic tion a

nd se nte nc e . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to the va lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss the a ppe a l. Se eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 4
- 1 0 5 3 6 2
Order entered June 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01536
- CR MOISE MARTINEZ, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cau se No. F11
- 62885
- Y



### O RDER In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, we OR DER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and c ourt appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attorney fee.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of th is order, by electronic transmission, to the

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STAEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          55,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,415
<ALLOWANCES>                                       956
<INVENTORY>                                      2,052
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,578
<PP&E>                                          40,090
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,350
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,350
<SALES>                                         87,392
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,392
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   213
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,879
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.73
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carmine Catizone,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Carmine Catizone
-----------------------------
Carmine Catizone
Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Creative Beauty Supply of
New Jersey Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Daniel Generelli,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/Daniel Generelli
-----------------------------
Daniel Generelli
Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2009
November 30, 2015

Petition for Exemption under section 333

Dylan Moore

225 Humar Street, Unit 5

West Bend, WI 53095

262.339.9595

djdylanmoore@gmail.com

DJ Dylan LLC

Aircraft:

DJI Phantom 3: Standard

Seeking exemption of;

Exemption for Section 333: As of March 23, 2015, the FAA will automatically grant a 

"blanket" COA for flights at or below 200 feet to any UAS operator with a Section 333 

exemption, provided the aircraft weighs less than 55 pounds, operations are conducted 

during daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) conditions and within visual line of sight (VLOS) 

of the pilots, and stay certain distances away from airports or heliports.

Use:

Aerial photography and videography under the current blanket COA.

Photos and videos would provide a unique view of community events including; not 

limited to; County Fairs, Car Shows, Weddings, and outdoor events. Photos and 

videos will provide a unique view for clients.

A professional approach to any situation will be applied before, during and after 

flight. We will provide a “safety first” attitude during the flight route. Line of sight 

will never be obstructed and will abide by all rules of un-manned flight vehicles 

including a 5 mile radius from airports as well as all flight pads or heliports.

Our goal in obtaining the exemption for 14 CFR 11.81 section 333 is to achieve

aerial footage to grow, promote, and inform of community events. All business will 

be conducted under an LLC license with no additional danger listed under the 

current blanket COA.
ALBA?;V, „lrW YORK !2;> 

3.242,22?i 

.'Vjw.aibcnvaii'portcom 

August 9, 2010 

Mr. Wade Davis 

Ogdensburg Bridge Port Authority 

Suite 102, 1 Bridge Plaza 

Ogdensburg, NY 13669-2299 

RE: Docket No. DOT-OST-1997-2842 

— o 

— to 

>>:iH—1 

oQ 

Dear Mr. Davis: 

The Albany County Airport Authority strongly supports the continued Essential Air Service provided to 

the Ogdensburg, Watertown and Massena airports by Cape Air. We believe that Cape Air is best capable 

of providing reliable, cost efFective and uninterrupted service to business and leisure travelers that rely on 

the Ogdensburg Airport. In addition. Cape Air's plan proposes a reasonable government subsidy with 

realistic fares. 

Today Cape Air provides important connectivity to the Capital Region of New York State, a significant 

number of New York State colleges and universities as well as direct connections to Albany International 

Airport's 70 daily commercial lights to 25 non-stop destinations. In addition, Albany is served by 

Southwest Airlines, the premier low-fare carrier in the United States. 

We have been most pleased to have Cape Air as a member of the Albany Team. Cape Air has a proven 

track record of on-time performance, safety and a fiscal strength that includes ftill ownership of its air 

fleet. We would not want to repeat the hardship forced upon Ogdensburg travelers by a failed airline, as 

occurred when fmancial difficulties forced Big Sky to abandon service to our North Country airports. 

These are important factors that should be thoroughly considered when weighing the future performance 

ofanEAS cartier. 

In addition. Cape Air supports our New York economy by operating a full-service aircraft maintenance 

facility at Albany International Airport. 

Under its new proposal. Cape Air will continue to support the North Country by maintaining its three 

daily round-trip flights to Albany and expand that service to include one stop service to Boston. 

In closing, we ask that the Ogdensburg community join with the Albany International Airport by fully 

supporting the choice of Cape Air as the most beneficial air carrier to provide Essential Air Service to 

Ogdensburg, Watertown and Massena airports. 

Sincerely, 

in A. O'Donnell 

Chief Executive Officer 

JAO;go
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Michael Siegel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 20th day of August, 2012.








MICHAEL SIEGELMichael SiegelChief Executive Officer
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 110

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National Children’s

Memorial Flag Day.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 26, 2001

Ms. BERKLEY (for herself, Mr. FLETCHER, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. ACKERMAN,

Mr. SCHIFF, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mrs. MORELLA, Ms. MILLENDERMCDONALD, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. CARSON of Indiana, Mrs.

NAPOLITANO, Mr. HINOJOSA, Mr. HONDA, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. STARK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

APRIL 26, 2001

Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged; considered and

agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National

Children’s Memorial Flag Day.

Whereas among the world’s 26 richest nations, the United

States accounted for 73 percent of child homicide victims;

Whereas at least 3 children a day die from physical abuse or

chronic neglect in the United States;

Whereas April has been designated as National Child Abuse

Prevention Month, an annual tradition started by President Jimmy Carter in 1979; and
2

•HCON 110 IH

Whereas the fourth Friday of each April is National Children’s Memorial Flag Day, when many State and local

governmental agencies and private organizations fly the

Children’s Memorial Flag to remember children lost to violence and to heighten public awareness of the need for

communities to help vulnerable children and families:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports National Children’s Memorial Flag

4 Day; and

5 (2) encourages national, State, and local agen6 cies and private organizations to fly the Children’s

7 Memorial Flag—

8 (A) to remember children lost to violence;

9 and

10 (B) to raise public awareness about the

11 continuing problem of violence against children.

Æ