alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**














**Certification
      of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Rotoblock Corporation
      (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Howard, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.








Date: March
      15, 2008 **ROTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION**





/s/
      Thomas M. Howard


By:
      Thomas M. Howard, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and
      Director
#### Mussio, Appellant, *v.*Glander, Tax Commr., et al., Appellees.

(No. 31223

Decided April 21, 1948.)

*425
      *Mr. Robert J. Anglin,*for appellant.

*Mr. Hugh S. Jenkins,*attorney general, and *Mr. Aubrey A. Wendt,*for appellee.

By the Court.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Section 2, Article XII of the Constitution, provides that “* * * general laws may be passed to exempt * * * public school houses, houses used exclusively for public worship, institutions used exclusively for charitable purposes * * *.”

Section 5349, General Code, provides that *“* * **houses used exclusively for public worship * * * shall be exempt from taxation. * * * ”

Section 5353, General Code, likewise exempts “real * * * property belonging to institutions used exclusively for charitable purposes.”.

The real property sought'to be exempted in the present proceeding is not used exclusively for public worship or does not belong to an institution used exclusively for a charitable purpose. See *Society of Precious Blood*v. *Board of Tax Appeals, ante,*62; *Watterson*v. *Halliday, Aud., supra; Gerke, Treas.,*v. *Purcell, supra.*

Taxing authorities are not authorized to split the listing of a separate parcel of real property owned by a single charitable institution so as .to tax a portion *426and exempt the rest of the property from taxation. *Welfare Federation of Cleveland*v. *Glander, Tax Commr., supra.*

*Decision affirmed.*

WEYGANDT, C. J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HaRT, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
391 A.2d 698

#### Commonwealth v. Roy, Appellant.

Submitted June 13, 1977.

Theodore R. Lewis, for appellant; James J. Narlesky, Assistant District Attorney, and John E. Gallagher, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

WATKINS, former P. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 257

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the men

and women of the United States Postal Servicehave done an outstanding job of collecting, processing, sorting, and delivering the mail duringthis time of national emergency.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 257

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas, on September 11, 2001, evil acts of terrorism were

perpetrated against the people of the United States and

all humanity;

Whereas, in October 2001, reports of anthrax-tainted letters

began to surface;

Whereas the United States Postal Service handles approximately 680,000,000 pieces of mail each day;
2

•HCON 257 EH

Whereas our Nation’s postal and delivery sector accounts for

approximately 8 percent of our gross national product;

Whereas, since September 11, 2001, the United States Postal

Service has delivered more than 20,000,000,000 pieces of

mail;

Whereas 2 employees of the United States Postal Service

have died as a result of anthrax infection;

Whereas a number of employees of the United States Postal

Service are being treated for anthrax-like symptoms;

Whereas the more than 800,000 men and women who work

for the United States Postal Service have done an outstanding job of collecting, processing, sorting, and delivering the mail during this time of national emergency;

and

Whereas the delivery of anthrax through the mail is an attempt to disrupt our ability to communicate through the

mail, and threatens the viability of the postal system:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) it is the sense of the Congress that the men

4 and women of the United States Postal Service have

5 done an outstanding job of collecting, processing,

6 sorting, and delivering the mail during this time of

7 national emergency; and

8 (2) Congress will work with the United States

9 Postal Service to assure the safety and well-being of
3

•HCON 257 EH

1 postal workers as they carry out their duties and re2 sponsibilities, and of the general public.

Passed the House of Representatives November 14,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Jacob Levy, Defendant. Henry Knoch, Appellant.

*People*v. *Levy,*169 App. Div. 571, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided March 7, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 5, 1915, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to remit a forfeiture of bail, to vacate a judgment entered thereon and to direct repayment of the amount thereof to the surety. The defendant was arrested on the charge of picking a pocket and the sum of $1,000 was fixed as bail for his appearance for examination, and was deposited, and the case was thereafter adjourned ■ for hearing, but the defendant did not appear on the adjourned day and thereupon the recognizance was forfeited. The defendant, however, was *673surrendered and appeared, and after a full hearing and trial on the merits, the complaint was dismissed and the defendant was discharged.

*Elias Rosenthal*for appellant.

*Edward Swann, District Attorney (Robert S. John-stone*and *George A. Lavelle*of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collet, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
No. 75-6571.

#### Knight *v.*United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Debra Lynn RHINEWALT v. Cecil Wayne RHINEWALT.

No. 57391.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 4, 1987.

Thomas J. Lowe, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

William R. Collins, Montgomery, Smith-Vaniz & McGraw, Canton, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Madison County; Ray H. Montgomery, Chancellor.

Before WALKER, C.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Robert Lee McCOY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BP-359.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 12, 1987.

*779David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge.

Robert Lee McCoy appeals judgments and sentences entered upon a finding that he was guilty of grand theft and burglary of a dwelling. The judgments in the separate causes were entered pursuant to negotiated pleas of nolo contendere which included reservations of the defendant’s right to appeal the trial court’s orders denying his motions to suppress.

Appellant’s argument directed to the denials of his motions to suppress is without merit, and the judgments are affirmed. *See Kelley v. State,*486 So.2d 578 (Fla.1986).

Appellant’s second argument, directed to his sentences, is well taken. It arises from the following facts. At the time the appellant committed the instant offenses he had not fulfilled a community service obligation imposed in a prior case. At the urging of the prosecutor, the trial judge determined that a community service obligation could be equated with a sentence to community control provided as punishment under § 921.187, Fla.Stat. Since a defendant under community control is under “legal constraint” as that term is used in the sentencing guidelines forms set out at Rule 3.988, Fla.R.Crim.P. *(see*Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P.) the defendant had added to his point total 10 points with a resulting increase in the presumptive sentence under the sentencing guidelines. The assessment of these additional points for “legal constraint” caused defendant’s presumptive sentence to be increased from the 21⁄2 — 3Va year range to the 31⁄2 — 41⁄2 year range.

An order requiring an indigent defendant to perform community service in lieu of paying costs merely makes such defendant a debtor of the state, in the same manner as would an order directing a solvent defendant to pay costs by tendering cash to the court clerk. Such order creates a debt owed by the defendant, but places no limits on his freedom. Surely a person otherwise entirely free who was in the process of paying off a costs judgment would not be considered to be under legal constraint. Furthermore, community service is not mentioned in Rule 3.701(d)(6), Fla.R. Crim.P. defining legal status at the time of offense.

Accordingly, the judgments are affirmed but the sentences imposed are reversed. The cause is remanded for resen-tencing of the defendant.

Judgments AFFIRMED, and the sentences REVERSED.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
#### Clarence G. BRODHEAD v. Robert Pearce SCOTT, etc.

No. 87-C-0022.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Independent Fire Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-751; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 115-613.

Prior report: La.App., 497 So.2d 1081.

Denied.

COLE, J., would grant the writ.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 190

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Alcohol and Drug Addiction

Recovery Month.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 23, 2001

Mr. RAMSTAD submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Alcohol and

Drug Addiction Recovery Month.

Whereas 26,000,000 people in the United States are addicted

to drugs or alcohol;

Whereas 85 percent of all crime in the United States is related to drug or alcohol addiction;

Whereas the taxpayers of the United States paid more than

$150,000,000,000 in drug-related criminal and medical

costs in 1997, which is more than they spent in that year

on education, transportation, agriculture, energy, space

exploration, and foreign aid combined;

Whereas each dollar invested in drug and alcohol treatment

yields 7 dollars in savings from decreased health care
2

•HCON 190 IH

costs, criminal justice costs, and work-related costs

caused by absenteeism, injuries, and poor performance;

Whereas treatment for addiction is as effective as treatments

for other chronic medical conditions, such as diabetes and

high blood pressure;

Whereas adolescents who receive treatment for addiction report using less marijuana and alcohol and being involved

in less criminal activity;

Whereas addiction treatment for adolescents also improves

the school performance and psychological health of the

adolescents;

Whereas a number of organizations and individuals dedicated

to fighting addiction and promoting treatment and recovery will recognize September 2001 as National Alcohol

and Drug Addiction Recovery Month;

Whereas the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment of the

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration sponsors the celebration of National Alcohol and

Drug Addiction Recovery Month to encourage citizen action to help expand and improve the availability of effective addiction treatment;

Whereas National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery

Month celebrates the tremendous achievements of individuals who have undergone successful addiction treatment

and recognizes those in the field of addiction treatment

who have dedicated their lives to helping people recover

from addiction; and

Whereas the 2001 national campaign for National Alcohol

and Drug Addiction Recovery Month embraces the theme

of ‘‘We Recover Together: Family, Friends and Community’’ and seeks to increase awareness about alcohol and
3

•HCON 190 IH

drug addiction and promote treatment and recovery for

the millions of Americans who need it: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress supports the goals and ideas

3 of National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17410]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7236]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-821-801]


Solid Urea From the Russian Federation: Extension of Time Limit 
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dustin Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0747 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    At the request of interested parties, the Department of Commerce 
(the Department) initiated an administrative review of the antidumping 
duty order on solid urea from the Russian Federation for the period 
July 1, 2010, through June 30, 2011. See Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Requests for Revocation 
in Part, 76 FR 53404 (August 26, 2011).

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act), requires the Department to complete the preliminary results 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of an order 
for which a review is requested. If it is not practicable to complete 
the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 
allows the Department to extend the time limit for the preliminary 
results to a maximum of 365 days after the last day of the anniversary 
month.
    We determine that it is not practicable to complete the preliminary 
results of this review by the current deadline of April 1, 2012, 
because we require additional time to analyze a detailed response to a 
supplemental questionnaire that was submitted on March 7, 2012. In 
addition, the numerous extensions we have granted for filing various 
responses has contributed to us requiring additional time to complete 
the preliminary results.
    Therefore, we are extending the time period for issuing the 
preliminary results of this review by 75 days, until June 15, 2012.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2).

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Gary Taverman,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-7236 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 1

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 3, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives and a conditional recess or adjournment

of the Senate.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That when the House adjourns on the legisla3 tive day of Saturday, January 6, 2001, it stand adjourned

4 until 10 a.m. on Saturday, January 20, 2001; and that

5 when the House adjourns on Saturday, January 20, 2001,
2

HCON 1 RDS

1 it stand adjourned until 2 p.m. on Tuesday, January 30,

2 2001, or until noon on the second day after Members are

3 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur4 rent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the

5 Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on

6 Saturday, January 6, 2001; Sunday, January 7, 2001;

7 Monday, January 8, 2001; Tuesday, January 9, 2001;

8 Wednesday, January 10, 2001; Thursday, January 11,

9 2001; Friday, January 12, 2001; Saturday, January 13,

10 2001; Sunday, January 14, 2001; Monday, January 15,

11 2001; Tuesday, January 16, 2001; Wednesday, January

12 17, 2001; Thursday, January 18, 2001; or Friday, Janu13 ary 19, 2001; on a motion offered pursuant to this concur14 rent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it

15 stand recessed or adjourned until 10 a.m. on Saturday,

16 January 20, 2001, or until such time on that day as may

17 be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the

18 motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second

19 day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to

20 section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

21 first.

22 SEC. 2. The Speaker of the House and the Majority

23 Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with

24 the Minority Leader of the House and the Minority Lead25 er of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the House
3

HCON 1 RDS

1 and the Senate, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

2 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the House of Representatives January 3,

2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
## SERVE D JUN E 22 , 201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
IN TH E MATTE RO F S/ P RESOURCES , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10WP000 5 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2010-031 9
NOTIC E O FHEARIN G DATE S Paragrap h # 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r befor e Augus t

21 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discover y including , bu t

not limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discover y disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner.. . NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o n Septembe r

2,2010 , inclusive , i n th e Nationa l Transportatio n Safet y Boar d Courtroom , 151 5 W
. 190t h ST
. St e 555 , Gardena , C A 90248
. Settle dcase s wil l no t b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s)
. Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expres s mail , courie r o r posta l service
.

—fS^" ^



### Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t KicEard0 / Goodwi r U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg eFA A Docke t No
. CP10WP0005 (Civil Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ON

E COPY Federa l Aviatio n Administration 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D

C 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 ' ON E COP Y Jame s Trato , Presiden

t S/ P Resources , Inc. , Responden t P.O
. Bo x 748 1 LagunaNiguel , C

A 92607 TEL : 949-600-7767 FAX : 949-297-3967 Christophe r D
. Nissen , Respondent' s Counsel Mannin g & Marder , Kass , Elhod , Ramirez LL P 15 * Floo r a t 80 1 Towe

r 80 1 Sout h Figuero aStree

t Lo s Angeles , C

A 9001 7 TEL : 213-624-6900 FAX : 213-624-699 9 Courtne y Adolph , Complainant' s Counsel Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacific Region , AWP-7. 4 Federa l Aviation Admmistration P.O
. Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C

A 90009-2007 TEL : 310-725-712 8 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorable Richar

dC
. Goodwin , Administrative La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2

0 U.S
. Departmen

t o f Transportation 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Building Groun

dFloor , Roo

mE12-32 0 Washington , DC 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega

l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Wp.shington, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-16-00131-CR 

Jason J. Ross 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From Criminal District Court No. 4 

of Tarrant County (1444581R) 

August 26, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot_____________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 25, 2011 

t0718 

Order 

 

July 25, 2011 

142982 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142982 

 COA: 295396 

Grand Traverse CC: 09-010846-FH 

DERRICK A. DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 3, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
D ea r E P A

,

I a m a r e s i d e n t o f A v e n a l a nd f e e l t h a t A v e n a l a nd t h e C e n t r a l V a ll e y i s no t t h e r i gh t l o ca ti on f

o r t h i s

n a t u r a l g a s po w e r p l a n t

. T h e e mi s s i on s t h a t it w i ll b e r e l e a s e d w ill b e hu r t f u l t o t h e popu l a t

i on a nd

ec o l ogy o f t

h e r e g i on

. T h e E P A a nd gov e r n m e n t o f t h e U n it e d S t a t e s m u s t e n s u r e t h a t bu s i n e s s e s h e l p

t h e e nv i r on m e n t r a t h e r t h a n hu r t it

. I a m a pp a ll e d t h a t t h e E P A w ou l d a ll o w t h e p o w e r p l a n t t o no t a b i d e

t h e n e w l a w f

o r e m i s s i on

. S hou l dn' t n e w a n d e x i s t i ng c o m p a n i e s b e r e qu i r e d t o m e e t t h e s t a nd a r d s

e s p e c i a l l y i f t h e y a r e n e w a nd m o r e c on s i d e r a t e o f ou r e nv i r on m e n t

. P l ea s e do t h e r i gh t t h i ng a nd e n s u r e

t h a t t h e p r e s e n t a nd f

u t u r e o f ou r V a ll e y c o m m un iti e s c a n b e h ea lt hy a nd no t w o r r y a bou t a no t h e r

po l l u t e r i n ou r b a c ky a r d

.

T h a nk you

,

L e ti c i a L op e z

A v e n a l P o w e r P l a n t

L e ti c i a L op e z

t o :

R 9 A i r P e r mit s

04 / 12 / 2011 11 : 18 P M

H i d e D e t a i l s

F r o m: L e ti c i a L op e z

T o : R 9 A i r P e r mit s @ E P A

H i s t o r y : T h i s m e s s a g e h a s b e e n f o r w a r d e d

. P a g e 1 o f 1

4 / 14 / 2011