alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William L. LOGGINS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80SA289.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 18, 1981.

*112J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Dale Too-ley, Dist. Atty., Brooke Wunnicke, Chief Appellate Deputy Dist. Atty., Susan J. Trout, Deputy Dist. Atty., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Normando R. Pacheco, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Defendant William L. Loggins appeals the judgment of the trial court denying his Crim. P. 35(b) motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

On June 11, 1971, defendant’s suspended sentence of indeterminate to two years for conviction of possession of burglary tools was revoked and the defendant was committed to the state reformatory. The defendant was transferred to the Denver County Jail on August 18, 1971 to await proceedings on the charge in this case, assault on a police officer with a deadly weapon. The defendant was held in the Denver County Jail until March 23, 1972 when he was sentenced to an indeterminate term not to exceed fifteen years.

On August 6, 1979, the defendant filed a motion pursuant to Crim. P. 35(b) for post-conviction relief. In his motion, the defendant alleged that the sentence imposed upon his conviction for assaulting a police officer with a deadly weapon was illegal because the trial court had not granted the defendant credit for time spent in presen-tence confinement from August 18, 1971, until sentence was imposed on March 23, 1972. The trial court denied the defendant’s Crim. P. 35(b) motion in a well-reasoned decision.

Section 16-11-306, C.R.S. 1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8) (amended 1979), which was in effect at the time the defendant’s Crim. P. 35(b) motion was pending, stated:

> “In sentencing a defendant to imprisonment, the sentencing judge shall take into' consideration *that part of any pre-sentence confinement which the defendant has undergone with respect to the transaction for which he is to be sentenced.”*(Emphasis added.)

The trial court properly applied the rationale of this statute in denying the defendant’s Crim. P. 35(b) motion. During the period between August 18, 1971 and March 23,1972, the defendant was incarcerated pursuant to the sentence imposed in connection with his earlier conviction for possession of burglary tools and he was receiving credit on that sentence for that time period. This confinement was not attributable to the charge of assault on a police officer with a deadly weapon.

Judgment affirmed.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 218

Honoring Robert Hautman for winning the 2001–2002 Federal Duck Stamp

Contest.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Robert Hautman for winning the 2001–2002

Federal Duck Stamp Contest.

Whereas Robert Hautman recently won his second Federal

Duck Stamp Contest;

Whereas Robert Hautman and his 2 brothers, James

Hautman and Joseph Hautman, have collectively had

their artwork featured on 35 State and Federal stamps;

Whereas Robert Hautman, James Hautman, and Joseph

Hautman have collectively won 6 Federal Duck Stamp

Contests;

Whereas the Federal Duck Stamp Program has raised more

than $500,000,000 to preserve wetlands in the United

States;
2

•HCON 218 IH

Whereas the Federal Duck Stamp Program has become one

of the most popular and successful conservation programs ever initiated, selling 1,500,000 stamps each year;

and

Whereas Congress should honor the artists who contribute

the artwork for the Federal Duck Stamps: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress honors Robert Hautman for

3 winning the 2001–2002 Federal Duck Stamp Contest.

Æ
III

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 325

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 13, 2002

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of

remembrance of victims of the Holocaust.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on April 9, 2002, for a ceremony as part of

4 the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims

5 of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the ceremony
2

HCON 325 RDS

1 shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as

2 the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives February 12,

2002.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1


 


Senior
Executive Long Term Disability

Supplemental Coverage Reimbursement Policy


 


Coverages under the Company’s Group Long Term
Disability (LTD) Plan which only covers base salary and Supplemental LTD Plan
which covers any excess base salary and bonus are fully paid for by our
associates.   With one limited exception
for senior executives earning an annual base salary in excess of $400,000 (“Highly
Compensated Senior Executives”), associates are not reimbursed for this
expense.  The Company annually reimburses
through bonuses (on a grossed up basis) the Highly Compensated Senior
Executives for their premiums related to their supplemental LTD coverage, and
the Company expects such annual aggregate bonuses to be approximately $70,000.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  I, C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr., certify that:  1. I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2006;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  August 11, 2006 By: /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[No. 18016-2-II.

Division Two.

July 12, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Sammy Lee Sutton, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 93-1-04427-7, Brian M. Tollefson, J., entered February 3, 1994. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Armstrong, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Turner, JJ.
Exhibit 32.3

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of HyperSpace Communications, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|   |              | By:    | /s/ Mark Pougnet        |
|--------|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | November 11, 2005 |   | Mark Pougnet            |
|   |              |   | Chief Financial Officer |
​

**Exhibit 35.2**

​

**Servicer Compliance Statement of Deere Credit Services, Inc.**

​

I, Steven N. Owenson, Senior Vice President and Finance Director of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

​

A review of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s activities for the period from October 31, 2022 through October 29, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 21, 2021 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables LLC and John Deere Owner Trust 2021-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

​

​

| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 9, 2024 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | By:                         | */s/ Steven N. Owenson*                    |
| ​               | ​                     | Steven N. Owenson                          |
| ​               | ​                     | Senior Vice President and Finance Director |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |
| ​               | ​                     | ​                                    |

​

​

----
IV

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 319

Honoring Henry Reuss, former United States Representative from Wisconsin,

and extending the condolences of Congress on his death.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

FEBRUARY 7, 2002

Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin (for himself, Mr. OBEY, Mr. KLECZKA, Mr.

PETRI, Mr. KIND, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. GREEN of

Wisconsin, and Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Henry Reuss, former United States Representative

from Wisconsin, and extending the condolences of Congress on his death.

Whereas Henry Reuss served as a Member of the United

States House of Representatives from 1955 to 1983, becoming one of the leading authorities in Congress on

banking and monetary policy;

Whereas Henry Reuss served as chairman of the Committee

on Banking, Currency, and Housing of the House of

Representatives from 1975 to 1977 and as chairman of

the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

of the House of Representatives from 1977 to 1980;
2

•HCON 319 IH

Whereas Henry Reuss was a strong supporter of conservation, civil rights, and improving the economic status of

women;

Whereas Henry Reuss was an early proponent of establishing

the Peace Corps;

Whereas Henry Reuss represented the people of the north

side of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in Congress for nearly 3

decades; and

Whereas Henry Reuss believed that the Government should

be open, honest, and accountable, as demonstrated by his

statement that ‘‘there is no defect of democracy which

more democracy cannot cure’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the

4 death of the Honorable Henry Reuss;

5 (2) extends its condolences to the Reuss family,

6 especially to his wife Margaret; and

7 (3) expresses its profound gratitude to the Hon8 orable Henry Reuss and his family for the service

9 that he rendered to the United States.

10 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives

11 shall transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the

12 family of the Honorable Henry Reuss.

Æ
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. S A N T O S H E R R E R A -M A G A N A , a. k. a. S ant os H erre ra , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 10289 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 9 - c r - 0 2 1 6 0 - J MR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J ohn M . R ol l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , P A E Z , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S a nt os H e rr e r a - M a ganaappe a l s f r om hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on and 5 1 - m o n th s e n te n c e f

o rr e - e n trya f

te rd e p o rta tio n , in v io la tio n o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), H erre ra -M agana’ s c ou nsel 

# FI LED APR18 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10289 2 h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th e r e a r e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w i thdr a w a s c ouns e l of

r e c or d. W e ha ve pr ovi de d the appe l l antw i th the opportuni tyt o f

i l e apr o s e s uppl e m e nt a lbr i e f . N o pr o s e s uppl e m e nt a l br i e f or a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S. 7 5 , 8 0 - 8 1 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f o n d ir e c t ap p e a l. W e d is m is s in lig h t o f

th e v a lidap p e a l w a iv e r . See U ni ted States v. N

gu ye n , 235 F . 3d 1 1 7 9 , 1 1 8 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N T E D . DI S MI S S E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 731-TA-865-867 (Second Review)]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 21, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Haines (202-205-3200), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. Hearing-impaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (                        *http://www.usitc.gov*). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                         *http://edis.usitc.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On February 6, 2012, the Commission established a schedule for the conduct of the expedited subject five-year reviews (77 FR 10773, February 23, 2012). The Commission is revising its schedule.

The Commission's new schedule for the reviews is as follows: the staff report will be placed in the nonpublic record on May 25, 2012; and, comments are due on or before May 30, 2012.

For further information concerning these reviews see the Commission's notice cited above and the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).

Authority: These reviews are being conducted under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to section 207.62 of the Commission's rules.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 21, 2012.

James R. Holbein,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-7286 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
391 A.2d 709

#### Lancellotti, Appellant, v. Thomas, et ux.

Argued September 19,1977.

Irwin Paul, for appellant; Thomas H. Tropp, with him Harris & Tropp, for appellees.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appeal quashed. *Larson Construction Co. v. Donaldson’s Crossroads, Inc.,*418 Pa. 300, 211 A.2d 463 (1965); petition for reargument denied August 14, 1978.

JACOBS, P. J., WATKINS, former P. J., and PRICE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 32.2  Section 1350 Certification  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Yan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  May 13, 2010/s/ Yan ZengYan Zeng, Chief Financial Officer,
principal financial and accounting officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[No. 17744-7-II.

Division Two.

August 9, 1996.]

#### *The Estate of*Mary Nikula, et al., *Appellants,*v. Tore K. Nielsen, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Thur-ston County, No. 92-2-00190-7, Wm. Thomas McPhee, J., entered November 12, 1993. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater and Turner, JJ.
Bill of Sale



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
  
 BILL OF SALE AND ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 
  
 This Bill of Sale and Assignment and Assumption Agreement (this
“Agreement”), is effective as of August 12, 2005, by and between Bullet Freight Systems and Logistics, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Buyer”), and Segmentz, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Seller”). All capitalized terms
used but not defined herein shall have the respective meanings set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement (as defined below). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Buyer, Seller, Pedro Betancourt, and Maggie Betancourt are parties to an Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August 12, 2005 (the “Purchase
Agreement”), providing, among other things, for the sale by the Seller, and the purchase by the Buyer, of the Purchased Assets and the assignment by the Seller and the assumption by the Buyer of the Assumed Liabilities; and 
  
 WHEREAS, in order to consummate the transfer of the Purchased Assets and the
assumption of the Assumed Liabilities, the parties are executing and delivering this Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein and in the Purchase Agreement and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Conveyance of Purchased Assets. The Seller hereby sells, transfers, conveys, assigns and delivers to the Buyer and its successors and assigns,
forever, all right, title and interest of the Seller in and to the Purchased Assets. 
  
 2. Assumption of Assumed Liabilities. The Buyer hereby assumes and agrees to pay and perform when due the Assumed Liabilities. 
  
 3. Counterparts; Facsimile. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same document. Delivery of a facsimile version of one or more signatures to this Agreement shall be deemed adequate delivery for purposes of this Agreement. 
  
 4. Controlling Agreement. It is contemplated that the Seller may, at
any time or from time to time, execute, acknowledge and deliver one or more separate instruments of assignment and conveyance relating to certain of the Purchased Assets. No such separate instrument of assignment or conveyance shall limit the scope
and effect of the assignment of the Purchased Assets and assumption of the Assumed Liabilities contemplated by the terms and conditions of this Agreement or the Purchase Agreement. In the event that any conflict or ambiguity exists between the
Purchase Agreement and any such separate instrument or assignment, the terms and provisions of the Purchase Agreement shall govern and be controlling. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

  

			
	Segmentz, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  


	 	 	Mike Welch
	 	 	Its Chief Executive Officer
	
	Bullet Freight Systems and Logistics, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	  


	Its:	 	  




  

 2