alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of Onex Falcon Direct Lending BDC Fund (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 
 1.
the Company’s Form 10-K for the annual ended December 31,2021 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 
 2.
the information contained in the Company’s Form 10-K for theannual ended December 31, 2021 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2022 

 
By: 
/s/ Eric Rogoff
 Eric Rogoff Chief Executive Officer**
##### 



Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
As of June 30, 2003

|                                        |  |                                                          
|--------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Wholly-owned by Ace Cash Express, Inc.: |  | Check Express, Inc., a Florida corporation               
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Q.C.& G. Financial, Inc., an Arizona corporation         
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Public Currency, Inc., a California corporation          
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Ace Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company    
|                                        |  |                                                          
|Wholly-owned by Check Express, Inc.:    |  | Check Express Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation       
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Check Express Finance, Inc., a Florida corporation       
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Check-X-Change Corporation, a California corporation     
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Check Express South Carolina, Inc., a Florida corporation
|                                        |  |                                                          
|                                        |  | Check Express USA, Inc., a Florida corporation
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 56

Recognizing March 2, 1999, as the ‘‘National Read Across America Day’’

and encouraging every child, parent, and teacher to read throughout

the year.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. ROBB) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing March 2, 1999, as the ‘‘National Read Across

America Day’’ and encouraging every child, parent, and

teacher to read throughout the year.

Whereas reading is a fundamental part of life and every

American should be given the chance to experience the

many joys it can bring;

Whereas National Read Across America Day calls for every

child in every American community to celebrate and extoll the virtue of reading on the birthday of America’s favorite Doctor—Dr. Seuss;

Whereas National Read Across America Day is designed to

show every American child that reading can be fun, and

encourages parents, relatives, and entire communities to

read to our Nation’s children;
2

SRES 56 IS

Whereas National Read Across America Day calls on every

American to take time out of their busy day to pick up

a favorite book and read to a young boy or girl, a class,

or a group of students;

Whereas reading is a catalyst for our children’s future academic success, their preparation for America’s jobs of the

future, and our Nation’s ability to compete in the global

economy;

Whereas the distinguished Chairman Jim Jeffords and Ranking Member Ted Kennedy of the Senate, Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee have provided

significant leadership in the area of community involvement in reading through their participation in the Everybody Wins! program;

Whereas Chairman Jim Jeffords has been recognized for his

leadership in reading by Parenting Magazine;

Whereas prominent sports figures such as National Read

Across America Day Honorary Chairman Cal Ripken of

the Baltimore Orioles baseball team, Sandy Alomar of

the Cleveland Indians, and members of the Atlanta Falcons football team have dedicated substantial time, energy, and resources to encourage young people to experience the joy and fun of reading; and

Whereas the 105th Congress made a historic commitment to

reading through the passage of the Reading Excellence

Act which focused on traditionally successful phonics instruction, tutorial assistance grants for at-risk kids, and

literacy assistance for parents: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes March 2, 1999, as National Read

3 Across America Day; and
3

SRES 56 IS

1 (2) expresses its wishes that every child in every

2 American city and town has the ability and desire to

3 read throughout the year, and receives the parental

4 and adult encouragement to succeed and achieve

5 academic excellence.

Æ
THOMAS EARL McPHAUL

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5792

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Kevin J. Carroll , Judge

.

Thomas Earl McPhaul, pro se , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., MARSTILLER

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Todd Weintraub, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Todd WeintraubTodd WeintraubChief Financial OfficerNovember 3, 2010









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
October 27, 2015

 Exemption No. 11946A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA−2015−1455

Mr. Matthew J. Clark

Counsel for RTI Group, LLC

Dentons US, LLP

1676 International Drive, Penthouse

Mclean, VA 22102

Dear Mr.Clark:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated July 22, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of RTI Group, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. You requested an amendment 

to conduct closed-set motion picture and television filming to your operations.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. The 

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are comparable in type, size, weight, speed 

and operating capabilities to those in this petition.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11946 

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 
2

granted an amendment to add closed-set motion picture and television filming to its UAS 

operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11946 remain in effect except 

as follows. Condition No. 2 has been updated to permit closed-set motion picture and 

television filming. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming 

are permitted. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 76 (Tuesday, April 21, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09232]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 73

Sulfur Dioxide Allowance System

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 72 to 80, 
revised as of July 1, 2014, on page 159, in Sec.  73.35, remove 
paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (iii).
[FR Doc. 2015-09232 Filed 4-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
#### Charles Leo GUILBEAU v. Dulan W. FONTENOT and Victor Fontenot, et al.

No. 87-CC-1171.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Guilbeau, Charles Leo Jr.; Guil-beau, Glenda B.; applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review, and/or mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW87-0273; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, Nos. 85-50006, 85-50009, 85-50008-D and 85-50039.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 566.

Granted. See order in 87-CC-1138.
AFS-11-020-E Exemption No. 4298M Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2003-14245

Mr. Paul W. Railsback Director of Operations Air Transport Association of America, Inc., Suite 1100 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. Washington, DC 20004-1707

Dear Mr. Railsback:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 4298, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 20, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Air Transport Association of Am erica, Inc. (ATA), for an extension of Exemption No. 4298, as amended. The exemption from §§ 121.311(f) and 121.391(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows ATA member airlines and similarly situated certificate holders operating under part 121 to continue to locate a required flight attendant at the mid-cabin flight attendant station during takeoff and landing on Boeing 767 airplanes.

In your petition, you indicate there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to ATA.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 4298, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 4298, as amended, remain the same.

Conditions and Limitations

1. If operations with four required flight a ttendants are conducted, one flight attendant must be located adjacent to a forward Type A exit, two flight attendants must be located adjacent to the two aft Type A exits, and one flight attendant may be located in the mid-cabin cross aisle area between the two non-floor level Type III exits.

2. If operations with five required flight a ttendants are conducted, two flight attendants must be located adjacent to the two forward Type A exits, two flight attendants must be located adjacent to the two aft Type A exits, and one flight attendant may be located in the mid-cabin cross aisle between the two non-floor level Type III exits.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 4298, as amended, to March 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded and must be attached to, and is part of that exemption.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San An tonio, Texas

November 28, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00608

- CV

CONVERSE RANCH, LLC,

Appellant

v.

SERVICE UNIFORM,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- CV

- 03729

Honorable Walden Shelton, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees ’ motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order the brief

due December 20, 2017.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of November, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0317.02.029.033 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Steam Electric ELG CBI?

Yes

x No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

x Outgoing

Date: 9/24/2015 Time: 1:00 am

x pm

Company Name: United Conveyor Corporation (UCC) ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Gentile

Contact Name: UCC Contact Phone Number: Conference Call

General Subject: Bottom Ash Complete Recycle – Cost Estimates

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Thursday, September 24, 2015, I participated in a call with Ron Jordan, EPA, and UCC to discuss bottom 

ash complete recycle systems, specifically remote mechanical drag systems (MDS). UCC explained that 

typically a surge tank, return water pumps, and piping would be required to recycle bottom ash transport water 

from the remote MDS back to the boiler to eliminate the discharge of bottom ash transport water. UCC 

provided the following capital cost estimates for the equipment:

- Surge tank: $250,000 - $500,000

- Set of return water pumps and associated controls: $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 (depends on quantity of 

units, desired level of redundancy, conveying system distance)

- Carbon steel return piping (and miscellaneous hardware): $50,000-$100,000 (can vary depending on 

quantity of units, desired level of redundancy, conveying system distance)

UCC explained that typically the plant would install one surge tank, one set of return water pumps, and carbon 

steel return piping (listed above) for each set of two remote MDS trains installed at the plant. Therefore, for 

every two remote MDS installations, the capital cost incurred for the equipment listed above would be 

approximately $2,500,000, with an estimated installation cost of $5,000,000 (total $7,500,000).

Further, UCC explained that there are two key components in determining the number of remote MDS 

installations required at a plant: sluice flow rate (in gallons per minute) and the number of sluice conveying 

lines that transport bottom ash from the generating units. UCC provided the following rule of thumb for 

estimating the number of recommended remote MDS installations for a plant based on the number of generating 

units and an equivalent quantity of sluice conveying lines:

- 1 generating unit: 1 or 2 remote MDS installations

- 2 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 3 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 4 generating units: 2-3 remote MDS installations

- 5 generating units: 3-4 remote MDS installations

- >5 generating units: depends on quantity of sluice conveying lines

UCC noted that the number of generating units at the plant may not dictate the total number of remote MDS 

installations if the plant has a different number of sluice lines than generating units. For example, some plants 

operate one or two sluicing lines for more than two generating units.

In a follow up conversation on 9/25/2015, I asked UCC about the estimated O&M costs. UCC stated that costs 

are “estimated $50-$100K additional O&M costs, but this is a very rough estimate at this time due to limited 

data.”
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 18 - 0588

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TRISTAN JAMES MORALES,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Thi s cau se , which was previously classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel , i s hereby re classified for submission to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable Ro d Souza , District Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2020

07/15/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0588
EXHIBIT
32.1





Section 1350
Certification


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Symmetry Medical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”), does hereby certify that:





The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter and three months ended April
4, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Corporation fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





May 8,
2009





/s/ Brian S. MooreBrian
      S. MooreChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Fred L. HiteFred
      L. HiteChief
      Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS: 

Closed to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

### Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: March 28, 2012.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7815 Filed 3-28-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P