alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1








Agreement


Party A: Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.


Party B: Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd.


Party A and Party B reached the following agreements after friendly negotiation:


Party B is willing to purchase a 20-year use right of an invention patent -glucoside type flavone biological transformation and purification method individually developed by Party A. The purchase price is RMB 46 million in one-time payment. During this period, Party A shall not transfer this method or allow any third party (organization, individual) to use it, except for using it as the raw material used in the self-made health products (glucoside type flavone soft capsule, ginkgo refreshing anti-dandruff shampoo, ginkgo refreshing body wash, ginkgo dental-care toothpaste, yin ling pine pollen capsule ). In addition, Party A shall also be responsible for sending technicians to assist Party B in manufacturing the qualified products. In the event of a breach, the defaulting party shall pay 10% penalty as compensation to the other side.


Party A: Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.(seal)





Signature of the representative:





Party B: Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd.





Signature of the representative:











Seal of Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.
















Seal of Shandong Spring Medicine Co. Ltd.





Date: 30 March 2010
R307. F.nvi ronrnl'.ntal Q u ali t y, Ai r Quality. R30 7-356. Appliance Pilot Light. R30 7 -35 6-1. Pu rpose. 111.: pu1posc of R307-356 i s lO r e duc e vo lali l c urgamc compound 

### CVOC'J emissions 

### from natural g.is-lircd fantypc l:CtltrJI f urn ac e'. gas 

### Iire places. and gas**stov~ .**  R30 7-356· 2. App l irnbility. R307-356 appl i es to manufacturer-;.**t.ltsmburo~ .**  re t

ailers. and**ms ta** **llc ~**  of residential

. mscirn t io n al. imd commcn:ial nacuml gas -fired fan -t yp.: 

### centrJl**fuma~~.** lireplace5

.**love s..**  a nd cooktnps, and**applic~** in Bo x Elder. Cac he, Da\ is, Salt lake. Toodc. Gtah. 

### and Web er councies

. RJ 07-J56-3. Exe mptions. The requirements of R307-356 shall not apply 10: (I) 

### Units using 

### a fuel other than naiural gas . (2} 

### Uni t s u sing an 

### intcrm1ttcnl pilot 

### igniti on: (3}**UniL~** u S«l in recreational vehicles: o r (
· t ) 

### Uni ts manufllcrum! and sold in 

### Box Elder. Dav1\ Cache. Weber

. Sall LaJ..c

. nml Utah counties thu l a re for shipment un J us.: o ulsid c of those counrics.
R

307.JS6-4. Definition s . The 

### following additional definitions npp l y to R307- 356 :
" Fun 

### type ccnrral furnace" means a self-conta in ed s pace heater pr oviding for circulation of hcuted air at**prc~urcs** 

### oth.:r rhan iitmospheric thro ugh du crs more than ten inches in length thnt have rated heat input capacity of**l~s** than 175.000 BTlJ pe r hour and that require singh: phase electr ic suppl y.

" fi1eplJ1.."t!· means a vented or non-venk'd gas 

### appliance

. in cluding free s tanding, recessed. 

### 1.ero cka mncc. or a fireplace 

### in::.i:l'L that simulah:s a solid 

### fuel fireplace. "Ra ted heat inpu r capac ity" m<.'ans the gm: ;s hear input capJdty specified on the nameplale o f either the unit o r 

### the burnt:r. "Rccn:ational vehicle"**m011L~** a motor home , tra"cl 

### trail er . t

ruck camper . or campin g lrnil cr, 

### wich o r 

### v.ithom 111011ve pow..:r. 1!cs1gne<l for human habitation for recrc:nional.**cmerg~n~ '.**  or**h~r occupan~y.**  R307 -3 56-5. Ge nera l Pro visions. After January I. 2014. no person shall manufacture for sn. l e, distribute. se ll. offer for sak. or 

### i11 ,:1tall any na111ral gasflJ\.,>d f.-ui-t) pc central fumaces.. gas fireplaces, or gas stoves that n."qu1re 

### th.: use 

## or u conunuou$ pilot light for ignition.
KE Y: pilot ligh ts, furn ac es. fireplac-es , stov e s Date of C nactmcnt or La s t Su bstantive A men dment: J anunry 

### I. 2013 4.uth o rizinj! , and Impl emented or Interpre ted Law : 19-2- IOt ; 19 -2-t04



## E

- 84
#### STATE ex rel. Melvin Carl MASON v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden.

No. 86-KH-1969.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Mason, Melvin Carl; applying for remedial writ; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 28-011.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)





I, Barrett E. Green, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Entergy Texas Restoration Funding II, LLC (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a who


le, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.  I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer, and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee.





---




Date:  March 22, 2024








By /s/ Barrett E. Green


Name:  Barrett E. Green


Title:   Vice President and Treasurer


of Entergy Texas, Inc., as Servicer


(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Environmental, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
American Environmental, Inc.



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August
31, 2012 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                      |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Environmental, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of American Environmental, Inc.



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August
31, 2012 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                      |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 18.1**

 

February 9, 2006 

 

Gold Kist Inc. 

244 Perimeter Center Parkway,NE 

Atlanta, GA 30346 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

We have been furnished with a copy of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gold Kist Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended December 31, 2005, and have read the Company’s statementscontained in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included therein. As stated in Note 8, the Company changed its method of accounting for amortization of unrecognized net actuarial losses related to its postretirement medical planaccounted for in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, *Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions*. The Company changed from recognizing amortization over the average periodduring which benefits are expected to be paid to a method recognizing the cost over the next year. The Company states that the newly adopted expense recognition method is preferable in the circumstances as the change will allow amortization of theunrecognized net actuarial losses to be recognized on an accelerated basis which will approximate the recognition period for the unrecognized prior service costs. Such change will result in a more systematic and rational manner of recognizing netperiodic benefit cost, particularly since the plan is now closed and all benefits are expected to be paid by 2010. In accordance with your request, we have reviewed and discussed with Company officials the circumstances and business judgment andplanning upon which the decision to make this change in the method of accounting was based. 

 

We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to October 1, 2005, nor have we audited the information set forth in the aforementioned Note 8 to thecondensed consolidated financial statements; accordingly, we do not express an opinion concerning the factual information contained therein. 

 

With regard to the aforementioned accounting change, authoritative criteria have not been established for evaluating the preferability of one acceptable method ofaccounting over another acceptable method. However, for purposes of the Company’s compliance with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we are furnishing this letter. 

 

Based on our review and discussion, with reliance on management’s business judgment andplanning, we concur that the newly adopted method of accounting is preferable in the Company’s circumstances. 

 

Very truly yours, 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #13050 and #13051]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated 03/16/2012.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/29/2012 through 03/03/2012.                    

*Effective Date:*                         03/20/2012.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/15/2012.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/17/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 03/16/2012, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Ballard, Johnson, Kenton, Larue, Pendleton, Trimble, Wolfe.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-7654 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of BG Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Grubbs,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. Robert Grubbs                   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | J. Robert Grubbs                       |
|   | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | August 22, 2005                   |

 

23

----
```

[Senate Hearing 114-505]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                        S. Hrg. 114-505
 
                                [ERRATA]
    S. 3018, THE SECURING ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE ACT, AND TO EXAMINE 
                              PROTECTIONS
              DESIGNED TO GUARD AGAINST ENERGY DISRUPTIONS

=======================================================================

                                HEARING

                               BEFORE THE

           SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC LANDS, FORESTS, AND MINING

                                 OF THE

                              COMMITTEE ON
                      ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
                          UNITED STATES SENATE

                    ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS

                             SECOND SESSION

                               __________

                             JULY 12, 2016

                       Printed for the use of the
               Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

           Available via the World Wide Web: http://fdsys.gov

                          [ERRATA]

    An error was made on the cover. The wrong Subcommittee was 
printed. The Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining 
was printed instead of the Subcommittee on Energy.
```
#### Lana MELDER a/k/a Lana M. Willis, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE of Louisiana, Through DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-43.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 26, 1987.

Writ Denied Oct. 16,1987.

Charles R. Albright, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Steven W. Hale of Salter, Streete and Hale, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellee.

L. Paul Foreman, of Raggio, Cappel, Chozen & Berniard, Lake Charles, for defendant-appellee.

Before GUIDRY, STOKER and DOUCET, JJ.

GUIDRY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the companion matter entitled *Melder v. State of Louisiana, Through Department of Highways,*512 So.2d 546 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1987), the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Defendant is cast with all costs of this appeal and costs of the trial court, all of which have been assessed in the appeal which bears our docket Number 86-678.

AFFIRMED.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 207

Recognizing the important contributions of the Youth For Life: Remembering

Walter Payton initiative and encouraging participation in this nationwide

effort to educate young people about organ and tissue donation.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 31, 2001

Mr. LARGENT (for himself and Mr. BROWN of Ohio) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy

and Commerce

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the important contributions of the Youth For

Life: Remembering Walter Payton initiative and encouraging participation in this nationwide effort to educate

young people about organ and tissue donation.

Whereas more than 76,000 men, women, and children currently await life-saving transplants;

Whereas every 14 minutes another name is added to the national transplant waiting list;

Whereas people of all ages and medical histories are potential

organ, tissue, and blood donors;

Whereas more than 2,300 of those awaiting transplants are

under the age of 18;
2

•HCON 207 IH

Whereas approximately 14,000 children and young adults

under the age of 18 have donated organs or tissue since

1988;

Whereas science shows that acceptance rates increase when

donors are matched to recipients by age;

Whereas organ donation is often a family decision, and sharing a decision to become a donor with family members

can help to ensure a donation when an occasion arises;

Whereas nationwide there are up to 15,000 potential donors

annually, but consent from family members to donation

is received for less than 6,000;

Whereas educating young people about organ and tissue donation promotes family discussions over the desire of

family members to become organ donors;

Whereas Youth for Life: Remembering Walter Payton (in

this concurrent resolution referred to as ‘‘Youth for

Life’’) is committed to educating young adults about

organ donation and encouraging students to discuss this

decision with their family and register to be organ donors;

Whereas the Youth for Life effort is dedicated to football legend Walter Payton, who broke the NFL career rushing

record on October 7, 1984; and

Whereas Youth For Life: Remembering Walter Payton Day

will be held on October 9, 2001: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) supports the goals and ideas of Youth For

4 Life; and
3

•HCON 207 IH

1 (2) encourages all young people to learn about

2 the importance of organ, tissue, bone marrow, and

3 blood donations and to discuss these donations with

4 their families and friends.

Æ
[No. 37197-5-I.

Division One.

July 8, 1996.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Karen Brannon, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 95-1-02875-2, Arthur E. Piehler, J., entered August 18, 1995. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leonard BROWN.

No. 86-K-2357.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-5037; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 302-273.

Prior report: La.App., 496 So.2d 417.

*203Granted and remanded to Court of Appeal for reconsideration in light of *State v. Chaney,*423 So.2d 1092 (La.1982), and *State v. Barrow,*352 So.2d 635 (La.1977).

CALOGERO, J., would simply grant the writ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-50233

Summary Calendar

_____________________

LAWRENCE EDWARD THOMPSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JACK D. KYLE, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees,

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas

USDA No. CA-A-93-669

_________________________________________________________________

January 17, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Thompson appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the

defendants in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Thompson asserted

that the district court did not give him adequate notice before

entering summary judgment; that the magistrate judge should have

been disqualified for personal bias; and that there were genuine

issues for trial concerning denial of his parole, the

constitutionality of parole policies in general, and his claims of
-2-

retaliation. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error.

Further, we find that Thompson's appeal is frivolous, and

accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Thompson

was warned in Thompson v. Jackson, No. 94-40956 (5th Cir. Aug. 10,

1995) that filing future frivolous appeals would result in

disciplinary sanctions. Accordingly, Thompson is BARRED from

filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal this court, or

any pro se, in forma pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court

that is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance

written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this

court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit

are directed to return to Thompson, unfiled, any attempted

submission inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.
#### STATE ex rel. Douglas BURLESON v. C. Paul PHELPS, Sec. of Public Safety and Correction and Rudolph F. Becker, III, Judge, Sec. “E”, Orleans Criminal Court, Case No. 304-651.

No. 88-KH-0247.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied March 18,1988. Writ Denied March 25,1988.

In re Burleson, Douglas; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-7110; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 304-651.

Denied. Appeal pending.