alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01/20/201 0 16:0 8 FA X202493514 2 Ja n 2 U 1 0 09:55 a CONL N MALONE YMILLE R FA A • » DM S 509623165 0 gl002/00 4 p. 2

I 2 3 4 5 6 7

t >
1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N
FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINSTRATO N Complainant / EMPIR E AlRLfNES , INC , db a EMPIR E AEROSPACE , Responder L UNISTRATIO N /

Docke tNo
. - Unassfgne d Cas e No
. 2009NV t130001 4 judg e - Unassigne d ANSWE R
Th e Respondeni- , b ythei rCounsel , file s thi s Answe rpursuan tl o th e rule s o f practic e an d state s a s follows : \
. 

### 1 . Deny . M . 1 . Deny . 2 . . Deny . 3 - Admi ttha tSectio n 51-00-0 1 establishe s procedur e fo rreportin g defect s t o th e manufacturer , bu tden yth e remainde ro fParagrap h 3
. 4
. Admit
. 5
. Deny
.

ANSWE R CONLIN , JV4ALONE Vi i MlLLE k rvn"ni-(.Mi:vs.-\ i L.'.U ' Si'OICAME.W,».';iiiN(;riv N w;ii i01/20/201 0 1G:0 G FA X202493514 2 Ja n 2 0 1 0 09:55 a CONL N MALONE YMILLE R 

### FA A + DMS 509623165 0 12 003/00 4 p, 3

J 2 3 4 S 

### 6 7 

### « 0

1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 l y 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 6
. Denv
. 

### 7
. Den y 8
. Deny , 

### 9
. Deny
. 10
. Deny , 1 1
. Deny
. Th e Responden tdenie.' ? -iri yviolatio n o fSectio n 14,5.20 1 (c)(1) , 145,207{a} , 43.13(a ) o r 43,13(b ) an d respectfull yrequest s tha tthi s matte rb e dismisse d Respectfull ysubmiito d thisy^- ^ da yo fJanuary , 2010
.

Mar k J
. Conlk T, .attorne yfo rRespOTi^en t

ANSWE R CONLIN
. MAiONE V& MlLLEIl
. ^•j i >* ' kivi-i<.siiJii.'\vis.,s..inT.<Ji i Si-t,iicANi- ; w/iSHlNCVior > T.O H01/20/201 0 1G:0 G FA X202493514 2 Ja n 2 0 1 0 09:55 a CONL N MALONE YMILLE R FA A + DM S 509623165 0 21004/00 4 P 4

3 ; i 5 6 7

1 0 1 1 L 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 I S 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb ycertif ytha tth e foregoin g Answe rha s bee n serve d vi a facsimil* ^ an d ceriifie d mai l - Retur n Receip tRequeste d thi s date , t o ih cfollowing :

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenu e S W VVashingto n D C 2059 1 ATTN ; Hearin g Docke tClerk , AGC-43 0 V\/ilbu rVv/righ tBuildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Tax-202-493-514 2 Davi d F
. Shayn e FA AAttorne y Federa l Aviatio n Admiriscratio n Northwes tMountai n Region , ANM- 7 160 1 Lin d Avenue , S W Renton , VJ A9805 7 Fax-425-227-100 7 Date d thi s 20t h da yo fJanuar y2010
. 

### %~^-/\juX-r--\r ^ if.Jd^J.' ^ Gwen n Kubi k Lega l Assistan tt o Mar k J
. Conli n

ANSWE R CONJ-IM
. MAUONE Y& MlLLKI t ,S1"I0H-M1^1'. 1 'M ' l.W I « i M,.n.ivi;n.sinti\v

tsum;'•I : i Sil'l>lC^^ll•..*AsHlH(.;'ll> ^ if/id l (ill^)fi24-.ll).'.l J
Cure RateCure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CONFIDENTIAL

- Do

not share without permission Page 2 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled and expire 7 days after printed date.**Cure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CONFIDENTIAL

- Do

not share without permission Page 3 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled and expire 7 days after printed date.**Cure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CONFIDENTIAL

- Do

not share without permission Page 4 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled and expire 7 days after printed date.**Cure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CONFIDENTIAL

- Do

not share without permission Page 5 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled and expire 7 days after printed date.**Cure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CONFIDENTIAL

- Do

not share without permission Page 6 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled and expire 7 days after printed date.**Cure Rate

Printed: 11/13/12 DOW CON

not share w Page 7 of 7

**Printed copies are uncontrolled**
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 26, 2015 518918 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

 GEORGE BURNS,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NEW YORK STATE WORKERS' 

 COMPENSATION BOARD et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 11, 2015

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

James Trauring & Associates, LLC, Schenectady (James

Trauring of counsel), for appellant.

William O'Brien, State Insurance Fund, New York City

(Matthew R. Mead of Stockton, Barker & Mead, LLP, Troy, of

counsel), for New York State Workers' Compensation Board and

another, respondents.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from a decision of an Arbitration Panel (pursuant to

Workers' Compensation Law § 20 [2] [d]), filed July 19, 2013,

which established claimant's average weekly wage.

Claimant applied for workers' compensation benefits as the

result of injuries he sustained in an automobile accident. 

Inasmuch as he worked for the Workers' Compensation Board, the

claim was addressed within the "neutral outside arbitration

process" provided for by Workers' Compensation Law § 20 (2) (a). 

An arbitrator established the claim for various work-related
-2- 518918 

injuries, determined claimant's average weekly wage under

Workers' Compensation Law § 14 (1), and awarded benefits. 

Claimant nevertheless sought administrative review, arguing that

he had been promoted to a new position shortly before he was

injured and that his average weekly wage should have been

calculated under Workers' Compensation Law § 14 (2). An

arbitration panel declined to address that argument because it

had not been raised before the arbitrator, and claimant now

appeals.

We affirm. The powers of the arbitration panel are

identical to those of the Board and, as such, it could decline to

review "any issues . . . that were not raised before the"

arbitrator (12 NYCRR 300.13 [e] [1] [iii]; see Workers'

Compensation Law § 20 [2] [e]). Claimant did not attack the

statement of earnings provided to the arbitrator by the Board,

and that statement did not indicate that any issue existed with

regard to the calculation of his average weekly wage. Thus,

"claimant failed to provide notice [to the arbitrator] that this

issue was in dispute," and the arbitration panel properly

declined to address it (Matter of Joyce v United Food &

Commercial Workers Local 342-50, 307 AD2d 552, 554 [2003]; see 12

NYCRR 300.13 [e] [1] [iii]; Matter of Brzezinski v Gambino, 100

AD3d 1192, 1193 [2012]).

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.
-3- 518918 

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dov Charney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                  
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




Date:October 29, 2010By:/s/ DOVCHARNEYDov CharneyChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 18, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00712

- CV

MARIA ALMAZAN , Appellant

V.
STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 62697

- J

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Browning

Opinion by Justice Molberg Before the Court is the parties’ agreed motion to dismiss the appeal. Pursuant

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( a)(2).

200712f.p05 /Ken Molberg//
KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE– 2

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MARIA ALMAZAN, Appellant

No. 05

- 20

- 00712

- CV V.

STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10

- 62697

- J. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices C arlyle and Browning participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 18 th day of September, 2020.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RACHEL IMSCHWEILER AND JARED

IMSCHWEILER

 v.

ILENE KATZ WEIZER, M.D., JAMES

XENOPHON, M.D. AND A WOMAN'S

CARE OB-GYN, P.C.

PETITION OF: ILENE KATZ WEIZER,

M.D., AND A WOMAN'S CARE OB-GYN,

P.C.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 950 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Huntsman Advanced Materials LLC (the "Company") for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter R. Huntsman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|/s/PETER R. HUNTSMANPeter R. Huntsman Chief Executive Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- | 

May 11,
2005

---



QuickLinks
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: January

24, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Howard J. Hoffman , EPA - OGC SUBJECT: November 2 6 , 2014 Telephone Call with Professors Freeman and Lazarus

Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants On November 2 6 , 2014 , Lorie Schmidt, Jonathan Skinner- Thompson, and Howard J. Hoffman of EPA - OGC met by

telephone with Professors Jody Freeman and Richard Lazarus of Harvard Law School to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing power plants.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6078

RALPH COLEMAN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-1702-6-20AK)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 4, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ralph Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Coleman v. South

Carolina, No. CA-95-1702-6-20AK (D.S.C. Dec. 21, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Grafe , Jerom e (DEP ) From : Sent : To : Subject : marchi.family@verizon.ne t Monday , Septembe r24 , 201 2 8:5 3 A M Grafe , Jerom e (DEP) ; Fichter , Katherin e (DOT ) Support th e Re d t o Blu e Lin e Connecto r Dea rCommissione rKimmel , Abou t 7 o r8 year s ag o th e Breme n Stree t Par k opene d it' s gate s - a gloriou s ope n spac e create d as mitigatio n fo rth e Bi g Dig . An d i t i s on e o fth e mos t use d park s i n Eas tBoston . Bu t ironically , fas tmovin g traffic/ro m th e Bi g Di g whic h i s overrunnin g Rout e 1 Aont o ou rresidentia l street s i s threatenin g th e safet yo fth e neighborhood . Withou t saf e streets , wh o wil l b e lef tt o enjo yth e park ? I don' t kno wi fyo u hav e children , bu t as a fathe ro fthre e childre n an d a lifelon g residen to fEastBosto n I a m acutel yawar e o fth e risin g traffi cpressur e o n m ystreet . Distracte d motorists , tryin g t o shav e a fe wminute s of fthei rdowntow n commute s an d tax i driver s flyin g dow n Meridia n Stree tt o avoi d a tol l don' tbelon g here . Traffi cimpact s lik e thes e ar e happenin g al l ove rEastBoston . The yar e directl yrelate d t o th e Bi g Dig . An d the yar e ar e burden s tha t th e Stat e wa s suppose d t o address . Th e Re d t o Blu e Lin e connecto ran d th e extensio n o fth e Blu e lin e t o Lyn n ar e tw o o fth e mos timportan tway s t o reliev e traffi cimpact s o n thi s environmenta l justic e community . Thes e measure s wer e fough tfo ran d wo n an d ar e th e Stat e o fMassachusetts ' mora l an d lega l obligation . N o polic yo rpolic ydecisio n ca n b e mad e i n keepin g wit h th e goal s o fcivi l right s an d environmenta l justic e fo r th e resident s o foverburdene d communitie s alon g rout e 1A , whic h put s cos tsaving s an d politic s ove rth e benefit s o fimprovin g mas s transi t an d fulfillin g th e state' s obligation s t o directl ymitigat e Bi g Di g an d Thir d Harbo rTunne l environmenta l impacts . Pleas e tak e thi s opportunit yt o approv e th e plan s fo rth e Re d t o Blu e Lin e connecto rno wan d personall yse e t o i t tha t thi s lon g overdu e initiativ e move s forward . Sincerely , Chri s March i 16 1 Saratog a Stree t East Boston , M A0212 8 

### 617-568-946 7

l
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 89 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 89

To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 
                 the United States on January 20, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

   Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Dodd) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To establish the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of 
                 the United States on January 20, 2001.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

    There is established a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as the ``joint committee'') 
consisting of 3 Senators and 3 Representatives, to be appointed by the 
President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, respectively. The joint committee is authorized to 
make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the President-
elect and Vice President-elect of the United States on January 20, 
2001.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE.

    The joint committee--
            (1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equipment and the 
        services of appropriate personnel of departments and agencies 
        of the Federal Government, under arrangements between the joint 
        committee and the heads of those departments and agencies, in 
        connection with the inaugural proceedings and ceremonies; and
            (2) may accept gifts and donations of goods and services to 
        carry out its responsibilities.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 55

Making appointments to certain Senate committees for the 106th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making appointments to certain Senate committees for the

106th Congress.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of S.

2 Res. 400 of the 95th Congress, or the provisions of rule

3 XXV, the following shall constitute the membership on

4 those Senate committees listed below for the 106th Con5 gress, or until their successors are appointed:

6 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Specter

7 (Chairman), Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Jef8 fords, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Craig, Mr. Hutchinson of Arkan9 sas, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. Akaka,

10 Mr. Wellstone, and Mrs. Murray.
2

SRES 55 ATS

1 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING: Mr. Grassley

2 (Chairman), Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Craig, Mr. Burns, Mr.

3 Shelby, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Hagel, Ms. Collins, Mr. Enzi,

4 Mr. Bunning, Mr. Hutchinson of Arkansas, Mr. Breaux,

5 Mr. Reid of Nevada, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Wyden,

6 Mr. Reed of Rhode Island, Mr. Bayh, Mrs. Lincoln, and

7 Mr. Bryan.

8 COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS: Mr. Campbell

9 (Chairman), Mr. Murkowski, Mr. McCain, Mr. Gorton,

10 Mr. Domenici, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Inhofe, Mr.

11 Inouye (Vice Chairman), Mr. Conrad, Mr. Reid of Nevada,

12 Mr. Akaka, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Dorgan.

13 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON THE YEAR 2000 TECH14 NOLOGY PROBLEMS: Mr. Bennett (Chairman), Mr. Kyl,

15 Mr. Smith of Oregon, Ms. Collins, Mr. Stevens (ex-officio),

16 Mr. Dodd (Vice Chairman), Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Edwards,

17 and Mr. Byrd (ex-officio).

Æ
**Exhibit 10.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the use in the Annual Report on Form20-F of Repsol YPF, S.A. and in Registration Statements Nos 333-12254 and 333-10668 of our report dated March 27, 2006, except for the Notes 1 and 39 and the approval of the consolidated financial statements by the Board of Directors of GasNatural SDG, S.A., for which the date is March 31, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Gas Natural, SDG, S.A. at and for the two years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores, S.L. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers 

Barcelona, Spain 

July 12, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:* Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Channels—Physiology and Signaling.

*Date:* April 11, 2012.

*Time:* 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.

*Agenda:* To review and evaluate grant applications.

*Place:* National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).

*Contact Person:* Geoffrey G Schofield, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040-A, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1235, *geoffreys@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 20, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-7579 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit
31.3
  I,
William J. Smead, certify that:
  1.           I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American
Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
  2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  Date:  October
      16, 2009
                Signature:
                /s/ William J. SmeadWilliam
      J. SmeadInterim
      Chief Executive Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00321

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D .R. AND L.A.R., CHILDREN

------------

FROM THE 323RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 12, 2011

, and October 27, 2011 , we notified appellant J.R. , in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss his

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant J.R. ha s not paid the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant J.R. ha s failed to comply with a requirement of the rules

of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28,

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

2007, 2 we dismiss the appeal of J.R

. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(c), 43.2(f). The

appeal of appellant V.E. remains pending.

Appellant J.R. shall pay all costs of his appeal, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 23, 2011

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing

f ees in courts of appeals).