alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 7, 2008



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
**Exhibit
      32.2**







INDEX
      OIL
& GAS, INC.





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil & Gas, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Boetius, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement req  uired
      by
      Sect ion
      906
      has bee  n
      provided to Index Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Index Oil &
Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.











/s/ Andrew
      Boetius





Andrew
      Boetius


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      11, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8599

JAMES CALVIN HORTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY L. WOODARD; RICK JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-759-5-H)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Calvin Horton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v.

Woodard, No. CA-95-759-5-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1995; Nov. 29, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 357

Welcoming Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Prime Minister of India,

upon his first official visit to the United States, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2000

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Welcoming Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Prime Minister of India, upon his first official visit to the United

States, and for other purposes.

Whereas the United States and India are two of the world’s

largest democracies that together represent one-fifth of

the world’s population and more than one-fourth of the

world’s economy;

Whereas the United States and India share common ideals

and a vision for the 21st century, where freedom and democracy are the strongest foundations for peace and

prosperity;

Whereas the growing partnership between the United States

and India is reinforced by the ties of scholarship and

commerce and, increasingly, of kinship among our people;
2

•SRES 357 ATS

Whereas the million-strong Indian-American community in

the United States has enriched and enlivened the societies of both the United States and India, and this community provides a strong bond between India and the

United States and is playing an important role in deepening and strengthening cooperation between India and

the United States; and

Whereas the visit to the United States of the Prime Minister

of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, is a significant step in the

broadening and strengthening of relations between the

United States and India: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate hereby—

2 (1) welcomes the Prime Minister of India, Atal

3 Bihari Vajpayee, upon his first official visit to the

4 United States;

5 (2) pledges its commitment to the expansion of

6 ties between the United States and India, to the mu7 tual benefit of both countries; and

8 (3) recognizes that the visit of the Prime Min9 ister of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, to the United

10 States is a significant step towards broadening and

11 deepening the friendship and cooperation between

12 the United States and India.

13 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

14 a copy of this resolution to the President with the request

15 that he further transmit such copy to the Prime Minister

16 of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Environmental, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
American Environmental, Inc.



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August
31, 2012 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                      |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of American Environmental, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
November 30, 2008, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of American Environmental, Inc.



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August
31, 2012 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                      |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
#### CITY OF PRICHARD v. CITY OF SARALAND.

87-366.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Dec. 9, 1988.

*1387James H. Lackey and Norman Gale of Clay, Massey and Gale, Mobile, for appellant.

Richard L. Thiry of Thiry, Maples & Brunson, Mobile, for appellee.

STEAGALL, Justice.

Plaintiff, City of Prichard, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant, City of Saraland, on a complaint and application for a preliminary injunction in the Circuit Court of Mobile County. We affirm.

The Cities of Prichard and Saraland have overlapping police jurisdictions. Pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 11-42-21, the City of Saraland annexed territory to a boundary equidistant from the respective limits of each municipality. The City of Saraland, pursuant to Ala.Code, § 11-42-22, then executed two additional annexations over a four-week period, each annexing to a boundary equidistant from the new Sara-land corporate limits and the Prichard corporate limits.

The City of Prichard sued the City of Saraland, asking that these three Saraland annexation ordinances be declared null and void as violative of § 11-42-20 et seq., and seeking to enjoin the City of Saraland from enforcing them. The court granted Sara-land a summary judgment on Prichard’s original complaint. The City of Prichard appeals.

On appeal, Prichard argues that a city may not, by a series of ordinances, annex land past a boundary that is equidistant from its corporate limits and the corporate limits of a nearby municipality. We disagree.

Ala.Code, § 11-42-22, states:

> “Any incorporated municipality having extended its corporate limits under the provisions of this article or any other law may again extend its corporate limits under this article or under any other law authorizing an extension of the corporate limits by such incorporated municipality. (Acts 1971, No. 2228, p. 3585, § 2; Acts 1982, No. 82-507, p. 838, § 2.)”

In view of Ala.Code, § 11-42-22, and because there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, the City of Saraland was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Saraland’s summary judgment is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

I, David I. Brunson, as Chief Financial Officer of North Atlantic HoldingCompany, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the U.S. Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 17,2004
# Euroopan unionin C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 138I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta28. huhtikuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 138I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta28. huhtikuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Tiedotteet |
| | EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET |
| | Euroopan komissio |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Komission lausuma asetusten (EU) N:o 508/2014 ja (EU) N:o 1379/2013 muuttamisesta annetusta Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksesta (EU) 2020/560 covid-19-epidemian vaikutusten lieventämiseksi kalastus- ja vesiviljelyalalla toteutettavien erityistoimenpiteiden osalta | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

IV   Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

2020/C 138 I/01

Komission lausuma asetusten (EU) N:o 508/2014 ja (EU) N:o 1379/2013 muuttamisesta annetusta Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksesta (EU) 2020/560 covid-19-epidemian vaikutusten lieventämiseksi kalastus- ja vesiviljelyalalla toteutettavien erityistoimenpiteiden osalta

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

IV Tiedotteet

EUROOPAN UNIONIN TOIMIELINTEN, ELINTEN, TOIMISTOJEN JA VIRASTOJEN TIEDOTTEET

Euroopan komissio

| 28.4.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 138/1

---

Komission lausuma asetusten (EU) N:o 508/2014 ja (EU) N:o 1379/2013 muuttamisesta annetusta Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston asetuksesta (EU) 2020/560 covid-19-epidemian vaikutusten lieventämiseksi kalastus- ja vesiviljelyalalla toteutettavien erityistoimenpiteiden osalta

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Komissio on tyytyväinen, että Euroopan parlamentti ja neuvosto hyväksyivät nopeasti ehdotuksen Euroopan meri- ja kalatalousrahaston muuttamisesta covid-19-epidemian vaikutusten lieventämiseksi sekä kalastajien ja vesiviljelyalan tuottajien auttamiseksi.

Komissio haluaa korostaa, että kalastuksenvalvonta ja tieteellisten tietojen keruu ovat erittäin tärkeitä parhaisiin käytettävissä oleviin tieteellisiin lausuntoihin ja luotettavaan täytäntöönpanon valvontaan perustuvan kalakantojen kestävän hoidon kannalta. Näistä yhteisen kalastuspolitiikan keskeisistä osista saatavia tuloksia ei tulisi heikentää rahoitusvaroja vähentämällä.

Komissio haluaa korostaa, että sen ehdotuksen ja siihen tehtyjen muutosten tarkoituksena on puuttua covid-19-epidemian aiheuttamaan ainutlaatuiseen kriisitilanteeseen ja myöntää tukea kyseisen epidemian aiheuttamien poikkeuksellisten ja välittömien tarpeiden tyydyttämiseksi. Ne eivät voi vaikuttaa Euroopan meri- ja kalatalousrahastosta myöhemmin annettavaan asetukseen.

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00097-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

362nd District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 24-1257-362

Before Womack, J; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE M.W.-M., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: March 7, 2024
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 40 1 . MONI C A BROW N v

. SOVRAN HOLDI NGS, ET AL.

Th i s cas e was d o ck et ed b y t h is co u rt o n M arch 1 8
, 20 1 5
, an d ap p el l an t ’ s b ri ef

an d en u m erat i o n s of erro r were d u e Ap ri l 7
, 2 01 5

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er,
ap p el l an t s ti l l h as n o t fi led a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs an d h as n o t req u es t ed

an y fu rt h er ex t en s i o n s o f t i m e i n wh i ch t o d o s o

. Acco rd i n gl y , t h is ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED as ab an d on ed p u rs u an t t o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru les 1 3 an d 2 3

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/29/2015 April 29, 2015
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2610-2611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-763]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Project 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free 
Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 7, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marianne Dominguez at 1-(888) 912-1227 
or (954) 423-7978.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Project 
Committee will be held Tuesday, February 7, 2012, at 11 a.m. Eastern 
Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made 
with Marianne Dominguez. For more information please contact Ms.

[[Page 2611]]

Dominguez at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (954) 423-7978, or write TAP Office, 
1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or 
contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-763 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>

            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                      OF VIDIKRON TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

It is hereby certified that;

1. The name of the corporation is Vidikron Technologies Group, Inc. (the
'Corporation').

2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by
striking out the first sentence of Article Fourth thereof and by substituting in
lieu of such first sentence the following new sentence:

     'The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have
     authority to issue is five hundred and one million (501,000,000)
     shares, consisting of (i) five hundred million (500,000,000) shares of
     common stock, par value $.0001 per share ('Common Stock'), and (ii) one
     million (1,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share
     ('Preferred Stock').'

3. In accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware, the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation
herein certified has been duly adopted by the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of Common Stock as of January 21, 1999, the record date for
the determination of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Corporation's
annual meeting of stockholders held on February 19, 1999.

Signed as of this 2nd day of March, 1999.


                                 -------------------------------------------
                                 Martin J. Holleran, Chief Executive Officer
#### F.L., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2686.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 22, 1988.

Leon Campbell, Sp. Appointed Public Defender, Sarasota, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the final order adjudicating him to be a delinquent juvenile. The sole issue he raises on this appeal is the failure of the trial judge to conduct a hearing pursuant to *Richardson v. State,*246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), before excluding the testimony of appellant’s mother for not having been listed as a witness in pretrial discovery. It is undisputed that there was a failure to conduct such a hearing. We have searched the record to determine whether the trial judge conducted the equivalent of such a hearing but find no evidence that such was the case. We are prohibited from considering whether the failure to conduct the *Richardson*hearing was harmless error. We, therefore, must reverse and remand for a new trial.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

 
| **Subsidiary**                | ** ** | **Jurisdiction** |
|-------------------------------|------------|------------------|
|                          |       |             |
| Bamboo Club, Inc.             |       | Arizona          |
| Cornerstone Productions, Inc. |       | Delaware         |
| Main St. Midwest, Inc.        |       | Kansas           |
| Main St. California, Inc.     |       | Arizona          |
| Redfish America, LLC          |       | Arizona          |
| Redfish Cleveland, Inc.       |       | Ohio             |

 

----
#### Carol HERTZ and Gerald Hertz, et al. v. WHITE CYPRESS LAKES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

No. 58559.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 29, 1989.

Floyd G. Hewitt, Jr., Compton, Crowell & Hewitt, Biloxi, for appellants.

James L. Galloway, Galloway & Galloway, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hancock County; Jason H. Floyd, Jr., Chancellor.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ROBERTSON and PITTMAN, JJ.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON and BLASS, JJ.
### Section 8

Copy ofPublic Notices in Newspaper of General Circulation See Attachments : 

# + Section 7 Articles 

# + Arizona Republic Public Notices 

# + GRIN Public Notices 

# + GRIC Pre-AdoptionNotice ofPublic Hearings 

# + GRIC Post Adoption Notice -District Postings
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-25,761-10

IN RE ALBERT HERNANDEZ CONTRERAS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 93-04-05639CRR IN THE 143RD DISTRICT COURT

FROM REEVES COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. Relator contends that he filed applications for writs of

habeas corpus in the 143rd District Court of Reeves County, and the District Clerk failed to comply

with Rule of Appellate Procedure 73.4(b)(2) and immediately send him any pleadings, objections,

motions, affidavits, exhibits, proposed or entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, or other

orders that were filed or made part of the record. 

Respondent, the District Clerk of Reeves County, is ordered to file a response and state

whether she has complied with Rule 73.4(b)(2). Her response shall be submitted within 30 days of

the date of this order.

Filed: October 25, 2017

Do not publish