alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mueller Group, Inc. (the“Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 26, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Darrell M. Jean, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Darrell M. Jean                        |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                       |
|   | Darrell M. Jean                            |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Mueller Group, Inc. and will be retainedby Mueller Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionand its staff upon request.

 

1

----
GABRIEL EDUARDO RAMIREZ VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### no. F-W5(p5G?& IN THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS ,_ 

## rteCtiVED IN 

## ATAUSTINC0URT0FCRIMINALAPPEALS SEEKING DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROMADECISION ByWe1** 201b COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS 

### IN CAUSE NOS. 05-14-01140-CR& 05-14-01141-CRh^!iSf>^^ fw PETITIONER'S , GABRIEL EDUARDO RAMIREZ'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME 

## FORFILING PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW FILED IN 

# TOTHEHONORABLEJUDGES OFSAIDCOURT: C°URTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS

ii ii i<» in^TM COMES NOW, Petitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez, pro se and 

## respectfully requests thatthetimeforfiling ofPetitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Rannfil^zjk:oste> Clerk Petition for Discretionary Review in the above -styled and numbered cause be extended. In support of this motion the Petitioner would show the Court the following: I. In Cause No. F13-56566-V Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault punishment was assessed at confinement for twenty years inthe Texas Department of CriminaUustice, Institutional Division; in Cause No. F13-59694-V Appellant was convicted of stalking and punishment was assessed at 10 years. The Court ofAppeals affirmed the appeal on June 23, 2015. II. 

### The present deadline for filing ofPetitioner/Appellant's Petition for 

### Discretionary Review is July 23, 2015. Petitioner respectfully requests an extension of 

# timeuntiF^pMllP-fl .20115.No previous extension of time has been granted. IV. Petitioner would show the Court that a reasonable explanation exists for the requested extension. The facts on which petitioner relies to reasonably explain the need for this extension are as follows: Petitioner has not had sufficient time after receipt of the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals to prepare his petition for discretionary review, pro se, for filing with this Court. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Petitioner respectfully requests that the time for filing of the Petition for Discretionary Review be extended to the aforementioned date.

Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez, Petitioner trt Street City, State, Zip

Certificate of Service 

### Ihereby certify that a true copy ofthe foregoing motion has been served on the 

### Assistant District Attorney for Dallas County- Appellate Section, Frank Crowley Courts 

### Building, Lock Box 19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 by depositing same in the United States Mail, Postage Prepaid, on this the day of , 201 .
Petitioner, Gabriel Eduardo Ramirez
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31219

Summary Calendar

 

CHRISTOPHER A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES C. FOTI, JR., Sheriff;

MARC MORIAL; BOYER, Warden; 

RICHARD L. STALDER, Warden; 

BURL CAIN, Warden; C. MARTIN LENSING,

Warden; HARRY CONNICK, SR.

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV03197-C

- - - - - - - - - -

September 17, 1997

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher A. Martin, #683347, appeals the dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit against defendants pursuant to Fed.

R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Martin’s claims

against Harry Connick, Sr., are deemed abandoned as they are not

argued in his initial appellate brief. See Cinel v. Connick, 15
No. 96-31219 

-2-

F.3d 1338, 1345 (5th Cir. 1994); Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222,

224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). We affirm in all other respects for the

same reasons adopted by the district court. Martin v. Foti, 95-

CV-3197-C (E.D. La. Oct. 17, 1996, Mar. 26, 1996, Feb. 16, 1996).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lotus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Adam Wasserman Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer  August 14, 2007  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 10, 2023 No. 04-22-00733-CV B. ANDREW GAME DMD, LLC and Bryan A. Game,

Appellants

v. BREAKAWAY PRACTICE, LLC ,

Appellee From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI06878 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R After this court granted the court reporter’s first request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record, it was due on January 9, 2023. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 35.1. On the onceextended due date, court reporter Mary Scopas filed a second notification of late reporter’s record. She requested a thirty-day extension of time to file the record. The request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on February 8, 2023. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days). If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by February 8, 2023, any request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. The report must describe the transcript in this appeal by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date. A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached to this order._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 149

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 6, 2001

Received

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a

ceremony to present posthumously a gold medal on behalf of Congress to Charles M. Schulz.

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized

3 to be used on June 7, 2001, for a ceremony to present

4 posthumously a gold medal on behalf of Congress to

5 Charles M. Schulz. Physical preparations for the
2

HCON 149 RDS

1 ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such con2 ditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 30, 2015

No. 04-15-00207-CR and 04-15-00208-CR

Jessica G. CASTILLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 458109 and 458110

Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant filed motions asking this court to lift the stay of sentencing so she may begin 

probation on these cases – as well as a third case – immediately, despite the pending appeals.

We ordered the State to file a response, which it has done. In its response, the State notes that by 

lifting the sentencing stays, appellant’s terms of probation will begin immediately, requiring 

appellant to write an apology letter, a letter that is the subject of one of her appellate complaints.

We ORDER appellant to file a written reply to the State’s response and file it in this court on or 

before November 20, 2015, specifically as to the effect an order lifting the automatic stays would 

have on appellant’s issue regarding the apology letter. In addition to responding to the State’s 

arguments, appellant should provide argument and authority on whether her request to lift the 

stay of the appeals waives her issue relating to the apology letter, as well as any other potential 

effect.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION January 7, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Engine Manufacturer’s Association (EMA) FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Thurs day , January 6, 2011 b etween EMA , EPA, and DOT and included the following individuals: EMA: Jed Mandel, Tim Blubaugh, Tony Cook, Brian Mormino, Steve Charlton, Patrick Charbonneau, Margaret Sullivan, Marc Miller, Tony Greszler, David Kayes, Brian Burton, Don Keski

- Hy

nnila, and Jack Yearing EPA: Chet France, Karl Simon, By ron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Houshan Zh ang, Don Kopinski, Julian Davis , Arvon Mitcham, Chuck Moulis, Jay Smit and Angela Cullen DOT: Maurice Hicks, Ryan Harrington, James Tamm, Kevin Greene The discussion focused primarily on clarifications of engine FELs, deterioration factors, hy brid certification, vehicle family definitions, off

- road tractor definition, coefficient of drag determination, ABT credit fungibility , tire rolling resistance, innovative credits, early credits, and vehicle speed limiters. A cop y of the agenda is included with this memo.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 248

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that public

schools may display the words ‘‘God Bless America’’ as an expression of support for the Nation.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 248

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that pub-
2

•HCON 248 EH

1 lic schools may display the words ‘‘God Bless America’’

2 as an expression of support for the Nation.

Passed the House of Representatives October 16,

2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Thomas T. Higgins, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeuroMetrix, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: November 12, 2009

/s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS Thomas T. Higgins Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Water Products, Inc. (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

I,
Dale B. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of Mueller Water Products, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: May 13, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/DALE B. SMITHDale B. Smith
Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

AND

NUCOR CORPORATION,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant

- Appellee,

AND

ESSAR STEEL LIMITED,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________

2012

- 1621

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of International

Trade in No. 08

- CV

- 0216, Senior Judge Thomas J.

Aquilno, Jr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

E LLEN J. S CHNEIDER , Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher

& Flom , LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff

appellee, United States Steel Corporation. With her on

the brief were R OBERT E. L IGHTHIZER

, J EFFREY D.

G ERRISH , and L UKE A. M EISNER . Of counsel was J AMES C.

H ECHT

.M AUREEN E. T HORSON , Wiley Rein LLP, of Wa shin gton, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellee, Nucor Corporation.

With her on the brief were A LAN H. P RICE and T IMOTHY C.

B RIGHTBILL . Of counsel was T ESSA V. C APELOTO

.

D AVID D’A LESSANDRIS , Trial Attorney, Commercial

Li t igation Branch, Civil Division, U nited States Depar tment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant

appellee. With him on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY

, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E.

D AVIDSON , Director, and P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY , Assi stant Director. Of counsel on the brief was D EVIN S. S IKES

, Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel for Import Administr ation, United States Department of Commerce, of Was hington, DC.

M ARK P. L UNN , Arent Fox, LLP, of Washington, DC,

argued for defendant

- appellant.

_________ _____________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM ( R ADER

, Chief Judge, M AYER

, AND P ROST

, Circuit Judges )

.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 13, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

C lerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TARLETON LLC, an Oregon limited

liability company, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois

insurance business corporation, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-35540

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-00989-AC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

John V. Acosta, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 9, 2016

Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Tarleton LLC (“Tarleton”) appeals from the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (“State

Farm”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 

FILED

DEC 05 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo. 

Evanston Ins. Co. v. OEA, Inc., 566 F.3d 915, 918 (9th Cir. 2009). Summary

judgment is appropriate if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to

Tarleton, there is no genuine issue of material fact and State Farm is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Olden v. Idaho State Bd. of

Med., 363 F.3d 916, 922 (9th Cir. 2004). 

State Farm is entitled to summary judgment. Tarleton’s insurance policy

covers collapses that were “directly and immediately caused only by . . . the weight

of contents . . . [and] equipment.” Tarleton’s expert, Wade Younie, identified in

his expert report elevated July temperatures as a contributing cause of the 2011

collapse of Truss D. There is thus no genuine dispute that a factor other than the

weight of contents and equipment directly and immediately caused the collapse. 

On Tarleton’s own theory of causation, the insurance policy cannot apply. 

Tarleton argues that summary judgment is improper because Younie later

submitted an affidavit withdrawing his opinion, stated in his expert report, that heat

was a “likely trigger” of the truss collapse. However, the circumstances

surrounding the withdrawal did not require the district court to credit Younie’s

change of opinion. Younie sought to retract a dispositive expert opinion without

any new evidence, only after a motion for summary judgment was made, and only

after a district court decision interpreting similar insurance policy language alerted

2
Tarleton to the damaging nature of Younie’s conclusion in his expert report. See

Bjugan v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 969 F. Supp. 2d 1283, 1291 (D. Or. 2013). 

Under these circumstances, the issue of fact created by Younie’s later-submitted

affidavit cannot reasonably be characterized as “genuine.” The district court

therefore did not err in disregarding the heat-related portions of Younie’s affidavit.

AFFIRMED.

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 27, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *Wells Financial Corp.,*                     Wells, Minnesota, has applied to become a bank holding company as a result of the proposed conversion of its wholly owned subsidiary, Wells Federal Bank, Wells, Minnesota, from a federal savings bank to a Minnesota state-chartered commercial bank.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-7802 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### James A. BURTON, Jr. v. John Dudley FORET and Casualty Reciprocal Exchange Co., Allstate Insurance Company.

No. 86-C-0936.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Casualty Reciprocal Exc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA 85 1124; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 68295.

Prior reports: La.App., 484 So.2d 753; 487 So.2d 1259.

Granted. Consolidate with 86-C-1097.