alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Den Europæiske Unions C 88I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 088I |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 63. årgang17. marts 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 088I

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

63. årgang17. marts 2020

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Oplysninger |
| | OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER |
| | Rådet |
| 2020/C 88 I/01 | Bekendtgørelse til en person, som er omfattet af de restriktive foranstaltninger i Rådets afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP og i Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 401/2013 om restriktive foranstaltninger over for Myanmar/Burma | 1 |

Indhold

Side

IV   Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Rådet

2020/C 88 I/01

Bekendtgørelse til en person, som er omfattet af de restriktive foranstaltninger i Rådets afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP og i Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 401/2013 om restriktive foranstaltninger over for Myanmar/Burma

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

IV Oplysninger

OPLYSNINGER FRA DEN EUROPÆISKE UNIONS INSTITUTIONER, ORGANER, KONTORER OG AGENTURER

Rådet

| 17.3.2020 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2020

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 88/1

---

Bekendtgørelse til en person, som er omfattet af de restriktive foranstaltninger i Rådets afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP og i Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 401/2013 om restriktive foranstaltninger over for Myanmar/Burma

(2020/C 88 I/01)

Følgende oplysninger bekendtgøres hermed for Than Oo, der er opført i bilaget til Rådets afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP (1) og i bilag IV til Rådets forordning (EU) nr. 401/2013 (2) om restriktive foranstaltninger over for Myanmar/Burma.

Rådet agter at fastholde de restriktive foranstaltninger over for ovennævnte person på grundlag af en ny begrundelse. Det bekendtgøres hermed for denne person, at vedkommende senest den 25. marts 2020 kan indgive en anmodning til Rådet om at få tilsendt den påtænkte begrundelse for sin opførelse på listen på følgende adresse:

| Rådet for Den Europæiske Union |
| --- |
| Generalsekretariatet |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Rådet for Den Europæiske Union

Generalsekretariatet

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-mail: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

I overensstemmelse med artikel 12 i afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP og artikel 4i, stk. 4, i forordning (EU) nr. 401/2013 tages alle indkomne bemærkninger i betragtning i forbindelse med Rådets regelmæssige gennemgang.

Den berørte person gøres ligeledes opmærksom på muligheden for at indbringe Rådets afgørelse for Den Europæiske Unions Ret på de betingelser, der er fastsat i artikel 275, stk. 2, og artikel 263, stk. 4 og 6, i traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde.

---

(1)  Rådets afgørelse 2013/184/FUSP af 22. april 2013 om restriktive foranstaltninger over for Myanmar/Burma og ophævelse af afgørelse 2010/232/FUSP (EUT L 111 af 23.4.2013, s. 75).

(2)  EUT L 121 af 3.5.2013, s. 1.

---
#### David DAWSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2256.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1988.

E.G. Couse of Grace and Couse, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Candance M. Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, David Dawson, appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence, contending that in adjudicating him guilty the court violated his plea agreement. The defendant seeks to either have his sentence corrected to comport with his understanding of his plea or to be granted leave to withdraw his plea of no contest. He sought this relief in the trial court, but his motion was denied. *See Counts v. State,*376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

The defendant contends that under the circumstances it was reasonable for him to believe that if his presentence investigation report (PSI) showed no prior criminal record and a current living status free of the defendant’s past problems, the trial court would withhold adjudication. The trial judge apparently did not have the same understanding as to that condition of the defendant’s plea, since he declined to withhold adjudication or give the defendant any relief despite a favorable PSI.

We have read the transcript of the defendant's plea and sentencing hearing. While the plea negotiations were not as explicit as we would like to see, we are persuaded that the defendant and his counsel were justified in believing that the trial judge would withhold adjudication unless the PSI was adverse. We have also examined the PSI, and it is as represented by the defendant and his counsel.

This case illustrates the need for an acknowledgment by the trial judge of any specific conditions of a plea tendered by a defendant. Here the trial judge apparently did not perceive the condition concerning the PSI in the same way as did the defendant and his counsel. While we do not fault the trial judge, we also cannot fault the defendant for his misapprehensions.

Therefore, we remand this case with instructions that the trial judge either sentence the defendant according to his under*347standing of the plea agreement or allow the defendant to withdraw his plea.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 65 (Wednesday, April 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20380-20381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8029]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1320-000]

Desert View Power, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Desert View Power, Inc.'s application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR

[[Page 20381]]

part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 17, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email [email protected] or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 28, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8029 Filed 4-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

78) IV-E-72 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM Sheet 78 of 117 
P.2 

January 17,2001 

Summary of Meeting with Industry on Class I 

Attendees: 

John Bunyak 

Betty Cox 

Ted Cromwell 

Dan DeRoeck 

Jerry Fulman 

Lee Hughes 

Lynn Hutchinson 

Melissa McCullough 

Bill Peterson 

Leslie Ritts 

Tammy Wyles 

On the phone: 

NPA 

American Petroleum Inst. 

American Chemistry Council 

EPA 

Alcoa 

Bayer/American Chemistry Council 

EPA 

EPA 

Shaw & Pittmam 

Hogan & Hartson (NEDA/CARP) 

Georgia - Pacific 

Henry Nichol, UARG 

Norbett Dee, NPRA 

Lea Anderson, OGC 

A^Oy*>-J 

EPA AIR DOC 

john__bunvak@nps. [ 

cox@api.org 

Ted cronmell@americanchemistrv. 

com 

deroeck.dan@epa.gov 

jbfulman@aol.coin 

Lee.hughcs.b@baycr.com 

hutchinson.lynn@epa.Hov 

mcculloimh.melissafalcpa.gov 

bill.peterson@shwpittman.com 

lsritts@HHLAW.COM 

trwvles@Hapac.com 

Meeting Summary: 

We reviewed the approach for involving the Federal Land Managers in NSR permitting actions 

that could affect Class I areas. We emphasized the benefits to industry and the public if these 

procedures are finalized.
#### Clarence L. MAINS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-02993.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 23, 1989.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Julius J. Aulisio, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Donna A. Provonsha, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

*1180LEHAN, Acting Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order finding that he violated his probation by failing to pay the balance due of a fine during the seven year period of probation within which he was to pay the fine. We agree with defendant that since there was no finding of defendant’s ability to pay the fine, the finding that defendant violated his probation in that regard was erroneous. *See Jordan v. State,*489 So.2d 224, 225 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); *Brown v. State,*429 So.2d 821, 822 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); *Smith v. State,*377 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

PARKER and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
### A "M/S^iM!JmB/m/s JvfjJtH 

## 4 A (Ofi^S^L


### (^^^ &*£L ^zt&etSjL <#&-> ^f^e^A .^f?^ jS- 

### ^*^_^^^^5^&^^^L^^_^^^^ ^^6l '*' tJLam aZ^^M-^u& 

### A I. 'o-zs-jio/s ^ZK#/_ i^^k&&0^^

/ r i'

### <^5^_>_c/i**iC .$rcooc^O-Jj>y4 l-Q—Z3-^5a/5 

## ^-fydaj:/-. ' ^ /'j&^£'Y^ * .«/ Ad^_ &-,g*&i4

i i • i
#### Mrs. George H. NEEL v. John H. RAYBORN.

No. 58294.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 8, 1989.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1989.

Charles H. Reid, Hattiesburg, for appellant.

Thomas E. Schwartz, Gray, Montague *&*Pittman, Hattiesburg, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Forrest County; Howard L. Patterson, Jr., Chancellor.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and SULLIVAN and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### McDaniel, Appellee, *v.*Rucker, Appellant.

(No. 31282

Decided February 11, 1948.)

*Mr. B. Earl Musick,*for appellee.

*Mr. William R.*McClenathen, for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for the year ended December 31, 2003, I,
William W. Staunton, III, Chief Executive Officer of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

    (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
         RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for the year ended December 31,
         2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION.


By:  /S/ William W. Staunton, III
   -------------------------------
   WILLIAM W. STAUNTON, III
   Chief Executive Officer

March 25, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ramtron International Corporation and will be retained by Ramtron
International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    Page-1
<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MuellerGroup, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Dale B. Smith, the Chief Executive Officer ofMueller Group, LLC, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.
| Date: May 9, 2006 | By:    | /s/ DALE B. SMITH          |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                   |   | Dale B. Smith              |
|                   |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                
                                FORM 10-KSB/A
                                
   (Mark One)
                                
         [X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
               THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
               For the quarterly period ended March 31, 1997
                                
                                     OR
                                
         [ ]   TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
               OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                                
               For the transition period from _______ to ______
                                
                        Commission File No. 0-17629
                                
                        ADM TRONICS UNLIMITED, INC.
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its Charter)
                                
             Delaware                              22-1896032                
       (State or Other Jurisd-               (I.R.S.  Employer Identifi-       
        iction of Incorporation               cation Number)
        or organization)  

               224-S Pegasus Avenue, Northvale, New Jersey 07647
                   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
                                
        Registrant's Telephone Number, including
                        Area Code:                     (201)  767-6040  

        Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                       NONE

        Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:


                            Stock, $.0005 par value 
                             
















 
                         ADM TRONICS UNLIMITED, INC.

                               EXHIBIT INDEX




PART II.  FINANCIAL DATA SHEET

EXHIBIT 27

                                                       

                                                        
                                                           
                                 SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                         ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc.




                                      By:\s\Alfonso DiMino
                                         Dr. Alfonso DiMino
                                         President



                                  And By:\s\Andre' DiMino
                                         Andre' DiMino
                                         Principal Financial Officer


Dated: Northvale, New Jersey
       July 11, 1997
#### STATE ex rel. Marion Francis GOWAN v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden.

No. 86-KP-1021.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Gowan, Marion Francis; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18275-KW; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 40035.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-01T12:25:22Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-01T12:25:23Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-01T12:25:23Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="18296">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-01T12:25:22Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>THE ATTORSET GESER~IL 
OF TEXAS 
</p>
<p>OPINION t-0 - 4151 WAS NEVER ISSUED OH 
</p>
<p>WAS WITHDRAWN. </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
#### Roger Dale KENNEDY v. STATE.

4 Div. 470.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

March 25, 1986. *

Sam Clenney, III, Abbeville, for appellant.

Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and Helen P. Nelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*

 Reporter's note: On February 1, 1988, the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Criminal Appeals on motion of the appellant,

AFTER REMANDMENT

TAYLOR, Judge.

In compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Court of Alabama in *Ex parte Kennedy,*518 So.2d 674 (Ala.1986), this cause is remanded to the circuit court for an evidentiary hearing.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-52928, 333-76134, 333-65363, 333-65361 and 333-65359 of Franklin Financial
Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated March 27, 2003 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to pending
litigation), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Franklin Financial
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Nashville, Tennessee
March 31, 2003
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hon. Joab Campbell 

County Attorney, Sohleloher Oounty 

Eldorado , Taxae 

/\ 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion Eo. O-1538 A\ 

RiB: 

This till 

stated above. 

It3 it neceeesry la 

ooaTlotioa under sea. 

&&&$~~ 

aoknowl 

0 

43 eooi t 0 your inquiry a0 

We quote 

sldaratlonr 

the Aot under ~mmIt ie our opinion that thilr lrtatuta ia neverable. 

The firat portion thereof prohibits the hunting or shooting of migratory bird8 or @me birde with *a ahotguu 

larger than teqT(qaage and that IB oapable or holding mere 

than three shc?$s at one leading", etc. She next~alaued, 
Ron. Joab Caepbsll, page Z 

*and providing that li a magmslae-loading gun is used 

and the magazine of suoh guo uould otherwise hold more 

than two (2) shells, berore suoh gus is used it shall 

be permanently plugged', eto., provides another dlstInct ntstutory prohibition. 

In other rords, It is mede unlawful 'to hunt 

or shoot mourning doves, *bite-winged doves, or sny rigratory bird, or any other game blrd o? this State tithe 

a si:otgun larger than ten-gauge and that is oapable of 

holding more than three (3) shells at on8 loading, Ineluding the ahell that may be held In the ohamber of 

suoh gun- whether said gun la a mngaslne-loadlug gun or 

not. It 18 rurther mdo unlawful to use an Qsgaslneloading* gun which has not been properly -I? p wed in 

oomFlIance with the statute. 

It is also our opinion that it would bs neossBary to allege snd prove use of a ps or shotgus larger 

than ten-gauge for suocesatul proseeutlon OS say offender not using a -asine-loading* gun but mah allegation and proof would not be esaentlal If saoh a Wagaalaeloading* gun be used. 

In examlnlng the entire Aot of whlob Seotlon 4 

-of Art1018 WQa-4.18 a part (B.B. 51, oh. 19, p. 1889, 

Aots 45th Leg., Bd C.S.) we find reference In the amergenoy clause; asme being 3eo. 9 of the bill, to tbs 

Federal regulations and the Inteut of the Legls~ture 

to avoid oonfliot tberewlth 18 apparent. 

We point out that Regulation 3 of the United 

states DeparvAent of the Interior mrcau of BlologIoal 

Surrey reads a8 followa: 

WRegulations 3.- Keotis by v&job migratory 

game birds may be teken. 

*The raigratory game birds on whioh opas Beasoas are speolfied in Regulation 4 ,of these reguulations may be taken during suoh reBpeotI+B OpSn 

seasons with bow and error or with a shotgua not 

larger than No. 10 gauge fired from the shoulder, 

exoept as permitted by regulations 9,8,9 and 10 

oi these regulations, but ther shal.1 not be tsksn 
Hon. Joab CmpSeI.1, pane S 

with or by means of any automatlo-loading or 

bend-operated repeetln6 shotgun capable of holding more than three BbellB, the magazine of 

whloh has not been out oft or plug@ with a 

one-piece metal or wooden rlller lnoapable of 

removal through the loading end 'thereor, so as 

to reduce tho capsoity of eaid gun to not more 

than three shells at one time in the magazine 

and ohamber oomblned: l t + * 

Trusting that the above'satisfaotorily 4nBwarB 

your ln~ulry, we are 

YOUrB very truly