alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 124 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 124

              Promoting national unity and family renewal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2001

Mr. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. DeLay, Mr. Armey, Mr. Rush, Mr. 
Shaw, Mr. Terry, Mr. Smith of Texas, and Mr. Ryun of Kansas) submitted 
    the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
              Promoting national unity and family renewal.

Whereas the unity of the people of the United States is essential to achieve 
        harmony and prosperity for all the families of the United States;
Whereas the people of the United States have traditionally observed a firm 
        reliance on God;
Whereas the first amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right of all 
        citizens of the United States to freely exercise their religious faith;
Whereas the United States has been blessed during its history with some leaders 
        who espoused a reverence for God, the dream of interracial harmony, and 
        religiously inspired moral values;
Whereas these religiously inspired moral values have enabled the people of the 
        United States, regardless of faith, race, or national origin, to foster 
        our shared ideal to become one nation under God;
Whereas these religiously inspired moral values have served as the cornerstone 
        for maintaining strong, cohesive, and productive families; and
Whereas it is incumbent on the religious, political, and community leaders of 
        the United States to set an example of unity and reconciliation in order 
        to restore civic peace and harmony among all the people of the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That--
            (1) there should be established a Year for National Unity 
        and Family Renewal to invoke the intercession of Almighty God 
        to bring about national unity, national reconciliation, and 
        family renewal in the new millennium; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States and interested organizations to 
        observe such a year with appropriate programs and activities, 
        including religious observances and the sponsorship of civic 
        initiatives.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 5, 2018

t1128

Order 

Clerk

December 5, 2018

157494

JOEL RAMOS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 157494

COA: 335061 

Van Buren CC: 16-066176-AA

INTERCARE COMMUNITY HEALTH

NETWORK,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 30, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00811-CR

IN RE JOHN GILBERT CENTENO JR., RELATOR

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 20, 2023

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

On August 25, 2023, Relator John Gilbert Centeno Jr. filed a petition for writ of habeas 

corpus challenging his arrest and pre-trial commitment as unlawful. This court has no original 

habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters; our original jurisdiction to entertain 

applications for writ of habeas corpus extends solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d). Our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate 

only. In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2016, orig. proceeding)

(per curiam); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). 

Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Court of 

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021-CR-11020, styled State v. John Gilbert Centeno, Jr., pending in the 

186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andrew Carruthers presiding.
04-23-00811-CR

- 2 -

Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. TEX. CODE 

CRIM. PROC. art. 11.05; see also In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d at 356.

Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s application for writ of habeas corpus for want of 

jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Ramtron International Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Ramtron International Corporation of our report dated
February 25, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Ramtron
International Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended which
report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of
Ramtron International Corporation.

Form     Registration Statement       Description
----     ----------------------       ---------------------------------
S-8            333-12265              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-33554              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-60594              Stock Option Plan
S-8            333-66252              Stock Option Plan
S-3            333-19119              Resale Registration Statement including
                                        shares issuable upon exercise of
                                        warrants
S-3            333-128653             Shares issued upon acquisition of
                                        Goal Semiconductor, Inc.
S-3            333-87404              Shares issuable upon exercise of
                                        debenture warrants and other warrants
S-8            333-133760             Stock Option Plan
S-3            333-139478             Resale Registration including
                                      shares issuable upon exercise of
                                      warrants

/s/  Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC
----------------------------------------
Ehrhardt Keefe Steiner & Hottman PC

February 27, 2008
Denver, Colorado
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing sympathy to the family, friends, and coworkers of Veronica ‘‘Roni’’ Bowers and Charity

Bowers.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 117

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas James and Veronica ‘‘Roni’’ Bowers of Muskegon,

Michigan, served as missionaries affiliated with the Calvary Church of Fruitport, Michigan, and the Association

of Baptists for World Evangelism;

Whereas the Bowerses conducted their Christian mission

work with their children, Cory and Charity, serving the

native tribes along the Amazon River in Peru since 1995;
2

•HCON 117 EH

Whereas on Friday, April 20, 2001, the Bowerses were flying

in an Association of Baptists for World Evangelism plane

piloted by Kevin Donaldson, traveling from the PeruBrazil border to the city of Iquitos, Peru, after attempting to secure necessary visa documents for their adopted

daughter, Charity;

Whereas the plane was mistakenly attacked by a fighter jet

of the Peruvian Air Force in an apparent attempted antidrug interdiction effort that may have also involved personnel of the United States;

Whereas Roni and Charity Bowers were killed, and pilot

Kevin Donaldson was severely injured in the attack;

Whereas Kevin Donaldson, despite his injuries, was able to

safely land his plane on the Amazon River, saving the

lives of his other passengers; and

Whereas the family, friends, and co-workers of Roni and

Charity Bowers have displayed a shining example of their

faith and grace in the face of this terrible tragedy: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) expresses and conveys its deepest and most

3 heartfelt sympathies to Jim and Cory Bowers and to

4 their extended families, friends, co-workers, and fel5 low missionaries at the Association of Baptists for

6 World Evangelism, for the loss of Veronica ‘‘Roni’’

7 Bowers and Charity Bowers in an attack by a fight8 er jet of the Peruvian Air Force on the plane in

9 which they were traveling;
3

•HCON 117 EH

1 (2) commends Kevin Donaldson for his heroic

2 actions in safely landing the plane and wishes Mr.

3 Donaldson a speedy and complete recovery from his

4 injuries; and

5 (3) strongly encourages the Governments of the

6 United States and Peru to work together as expedi7 tiously as possible to determine all the circumstances

8 that led to this unfortunate and regrettable incident

9 and to ensure that an incident of this kind never oc10 curs again.

Passed the House of Representatives May 1, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek Caleb Brett as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek Caleb Brett, 6050 Egret Court, Benicia, CA 94510, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630001134d0f02010b1223070b104d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1828391cf8d80838990a1858992cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.

http://cbp.gov/linkhandler/cgov/trade/automated/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/gaulist.ctt/gaulist.pdf

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on October 12, 2011. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for October 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mike McCormick, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-7414 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

RACHEL IMSCHWEILER AND JARED IMSCHWEILER

v. ILENE KATZ WEIZER, M.D., JAMES XENOPHON, M.D. AND A WOMAN'S CARE OB-GYN, P.C.
PETITION OF: ILENE KATZ WEIZER, M.D., AND A WOMAN'S CARE OB-GYN, P.C. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 950 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
#### STATE ex rel. Barry DIGGS v. Frank SHEA, Judge, Section G, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 88-KH-0303.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 3, 1988.

In re Diggs, Barry; applying for Supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. "G”, No. 276-757.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he has filed below. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mueller Water Products, Inc. (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

I,
Thomas E. Fish, the Interim Chief Financial Officer of Mueller Water Products, Inc., certify that, to the best of my knowledge:



|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/THOMAS E. FISHThomas E. Fish
Interim Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION""' 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS f''~ WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In The Matter Of: 

PAZ AVIATION, INC, 

Respondent 

Docket No, FAA-2014-0807 

Judge J,E, Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 2011SOI90272 

JOINT PROPOSED SCHEDULING PLAN 

Pursuant to the Judge's October 1, 2015, Order, the parties hereby submit the following 

proposed scheduling/discovery plan: 

January 12, 2016: Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference 

February 5, 2016: Deadline for Initial Disclosures 

February 8, 2016: General Discovery Begins; parties may initiate written discovery; 

parties may issue Notices of Deposition 

March 25,2016: Deadline for initial expert disclosures 

March 28, 2016: Beginning of deposition period (expert or non-expert) 

May 16,2016: Deadline to issue deposition notices and/or request subpoenas for thirdparty depositions 

July 8, 2016: End of deposition period (expert or non-expert) 

July 22, 2016: Deadline to issue written discovery requests; deadline for supplemental 

expert witness reports 

August 26, 2016: Close of general discovery; all discovery responses due by this date; 

remaining discovery time available only to resolve disputes on existing discovery 

1 
September 30, 2016: Final Close of Discovery 

October 14, 2016: Dispositive Motion Deadline 

October 28,2016: Deadline to Respond to Dispositive Motions 

November 4, 2016: Deadline for Replies in Support of Dispositive Motions 

December 2016: Motion Conference on Dispositive Motions 

January or February 2017: Pre-Hearing Conference 

March 3, 2017: Deadline for exchange of witness lists and exhibits 

March 24, 2017: Deadline to file written stipulations and/or motions in limine 

Spring 2017: Hearing 

1'~--

Respectfully submitted this L day of December, 2015, 

Brandon C. Goldberg 

Attorney 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Joint Proposed Scheduling Plan was sent: 

original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 

one copy via Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

facsimile: (202) 366-7536 

one copy via Federal Express to: 

David M. McDonald, Esq. 

McDonald & McDonald 

Attorneys at Law 

5600 NW 36 Street 

Suite 100 

Miami, Florida 3 3166 

M~r;~ ~~RALD A. JE S 

Program Analyst 

DEC 3-, 

Dated 

3
### Re: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172 Susan Stone to: Emily Stich 03/11/2010 03:44 PM Cc: Tricia Crabtree

Dear Ms. Stich: We have received several requests to extend the public comment period on the ozone proposal. We are currently considering these requests, and I will let you know as soon as a decision is made. Sincerely, Susan Stone Susan Lyon Stone Ambient Standards Group l US EPA (C504-06) l Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-1146 l Fax: 919- 541-0237 l HSD Phone 919-966-6226 "Emily Stich" 03/11/2010 03:21:23 PM Dear Ms. Stone et al., Attached please find a req...

From: "Emily Stich" <EmilyS@labi.org> To: Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/11/2010 03:21 PM Subject: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0172

Dear Ms. Stone et al., Attached please find a request for an extension of time for submitting comments from the Louisiana Association of Business & Industry regarding EPA-HQ-OAR- 2005-0172, NAAQS for Ozone. Should you have any questions or require further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments.



### Emily C. Stich VP, Research & Programs EQ Council Director Louisiana Association of Business & Industry Box 80258 Baton Rouge, LA 70898-0258 225/928-5388 phone 225/929-6054 fax emilys@LABI.org www.LABI.org
#### FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION v. The Unopened Succession of Patricia Blakeman BUSBEY.

No. 86-CC-1128.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Federal National Mtg. Assn.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-C-87; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 319-247.

Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed; ruling of the trial judge refusing the temporary restraining order is reinstated. Case remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
NO. 01-15-00446-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT HOUSTON

BRANDON TODERICK JOHNSON,

 Appellant §

§

vs. §

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee §

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

ON APPEAL FROM CAUSE NO. 1458348

IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

Thomas J. Lewis

State Bar No. 12308540

1601 Washington Ave.

Houston, Texas 77007

Phone: (713) 256-6779

Fax: (713) 861-2951

E-Mail: tjlaw2@comcast.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

ACCEPTED

01-15-00446-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/7/2015 2:54:59 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/7/2015 2:54:59 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COMES NOW JBRANDON TODERICKJOHNSON,APPELLANT, and moves

the Court to extend the time for filing a brief herein, and in support thereof would

show as follows:

I.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of Aggravated Robbery with a Deadly

Weapon. He was sentenced on April 30, 2015 to a term of 30 years in prison. 

II.

The brief herein was due on August 5, 2015. Appellant’s counsel is a sole

practitioner and is currently preparing briefs on three other cases. Counsel as also

preparing for felony jury trials set in August 2015. 

III.

Appellant counsel requests an extension of 60 days, making the brief due on

October 4, 2015, so the Appellant may receive effective assistance of counsel. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays this Court to

grant this Motion and extend the time for the filing of a brief herein.

Respectfully submitted,

Thomas J. Lewis

State Bar No. 12308540

1602 Washington Ave.

Houston, Texas 77007

Phone: (713) 256-6779

Fax: (713) 861-2951

E-Mail: tjlaw2@comcast.net

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

 Thomas J. Lewis
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I the undersigned attorney certify that a true copy of the foregoing was served

on the District Attorney of Harris County, Texas, by e-mail on this the 7th day of

August, 2015.

______________

Thomas J. Lewis

 Thomas J. Lewis
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50950

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO HERNANDEZ-SOSA, also known as

Roberto Rodriguez-Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-03-CR-600-ALL-DB

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Pedro Hernandez-Sosa appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Hernandez-Sosa contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have
No. 03-50950

-2-

been alleged in his indictment. Hernandez-Sosa maintains that he

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Hernandez-Sosa acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.