alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 1998, and the consolidated statement
of income for the year ended August 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,264
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      474
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,738
<PP&E>                                          47,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,131
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,910
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,910
<SALES>                                          7,222
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,320
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,723
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,723
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,723
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63


</TABLE>
AGREEMENT IN PRINCIPLE

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND

THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

March 15, 2013

The Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the U.S. E nvir onmental Protection Agency have reached an agreement to protect Florida’s waterways from excess nitrogen and phosphorus pollution. These pollutants cause algal blooms and are among the largest contributors to water quality problems in Florida. This agreement marks a significant
step fo rward in protecting and restoring water quality across the state.

Measurable nutrient criteria will result in cleaner, safer water for all Floridians. Clean water is vital to Florida’s future. The health and growth of Florida ’s economy

-- and the jobs that go
with it

-- depend on high quality and sustainable sources of water. Tourism

– Florida’s economic
lifeblood

– employs more than 900,000 Floridians and generates nearly $60 billion annually for Florida’s economy.

The E PA and FDEP have worked diligently and collaboratively to use the best science available, to carefully consider the extensive public comments submitted to EPA and FDEP , and to exercise flexibility consistent with the leadership responsibility of the State of Florida under the
Clean Water Act.

This agreement

, once implemented and completed, coupled with EPA’s prior (November 30, 2012) approval of FDEP’s newly adopted w ater q uality s tandards, will result in Florida having

numeric nutrient criteria for lake s, springs, estuaries and coastal waters, and the vast majority of flowing waters in the State.

This agreement is contingent upon passage of the language included in the attached version of
draft legislation by the Florida Legislature and adoption by reference into Florida rule the document entitled “Implementation of Florida’s Numeric Nutrient Stand ards” as modified on March 11, 2013

. The agreement is based on the premise that the attached version of the legislation and the Implementation Document ar e consistent with the Clean Water Act. The
attached document “Path Forward” details the actions FDEP and EPA will take to satisfy the
Determination and Consent Decree.

We expect this agreement will provide a strong, effective framework for protecting and restoring waters that are vital to the economic and environmental health of Florida.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 356 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 356

    To authorize documentary production by the Select Committee on 
                             Intelligence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To authorize documentary production by the Select Committee on 
                             Intelligence.

Whereas the Federal Bureau of Investigation has requested that the Senate Select 
        Committee on Intelligence provide it with a certified copy of the 
        testimony of former Director of Central Intelligence John M. Deutch 
        during its closed February 22, 2000 hearing, in connection with a 
        pending inquiry into the alleged improper handling of classified 
        information by Mr. Deutch;
Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the 
        Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the 
        possession of the Senate can, by the administrative or judicial process, 
        be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the 
        Senate; and
Whereas, when it appears that documents, papers, and records under the control 
        or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of 
        justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of 
        justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Senate Select 
Committee on Intelligence, acting jointly, are authorized to provide to 
the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under appropriate security 
procedures, a certified copy of the transcript of its closed February 
22, 2000 hearing.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2297

RONNIE LEE ALSTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OURISMAN CHEVROLET “ET AL”,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03740-PX)

No. 16-2298

In re: RONNIE LEE ALSTON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:15-cv-03740-PX)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
2

No. 16-2297, Dismissed; No. 16-2298, Petition denied by unpublished per curiam 

opinion.

Ronnie Lee Alston, Appellant; Petitioner Pro Se. Richard W. Evans, MCCARTHY 

WILSON, LLP, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated proceedings, Ronnie Lee Alston seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing without prejudice his amended complaint for failure to state a 

claim, and petitions for a writ of mandamus related to that case. Alston asks that the writ 

of mandamus instruct the district court to assign a different judge to his underlying case, 

require the return of seized property, order discovery, and set a trial date.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s order to note an 

appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period 

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). 

“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” 

Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

Here, the district court’s order was entered on the docket on September 16, 2016. 

The notice of appeal was filed 45 days later, on October 31, 2016. Because Alston failed 

to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal 

period, we dismiss the appeal in No. 16-2297 for lack of jurisdiction.

Additionally, we conclude that Alston has not met any of the requirements for the 

extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-

17 (4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, 

we deny mandamus relief in No. 16-2298. We dispense with oral argument in these
4

proceedings because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 16-2297, DISMISSED,

No. 16-2298, PETITION DENIED
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Avado Brands, Inc.:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-49748, 33-68978, 333-3764, 333-3736, and 333-56138) and the
registration  statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-25205) of Avado Brands, Inc. of our
report dated January 26, 2001,  except for Note 7, which is as of April 2, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Avado Brands, Inc. as of December
31,  2000  and  January  2,  2000 and the  related  consolidated  statements  of
earnings, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December  31, 2000,  which report
appears in the  December  31, 2000 annual  report on Form 10-K of Avado  Brands,
Inc.


KPMG

Atlanta, Georgia
April 2, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19717-19718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; 
Cerilliant Corporation

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 17, 2012, Cerilliant 
Corporation, 811 Paloma Drive, Suite A, Round Rock, Texas 78665-2402, 
made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) 
to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes 
of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-methyl-N-methylcathinone (1248)..........  I
3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (7535)......  I
3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylcathinone (7540)  I
Desomorphine (9055)........................  I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed 
controlled substances to make reference standards which will be 
distributed to their customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 1, 2012.


[[Page 19718]]


     Dated: March 23, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-7759 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KELVIN MANN,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 108 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of November

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andre
DiMino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in Annual Form 10-KSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc.








/ S
      / ANDRE DIMINOANDRE
      DIMINOCHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL
      OFFICERADM
      TRONICS UNLIMITED, INC.





June30, 2008
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

SANTOS HERRERA-MAGANA, a.k.a.

Santos Herrera,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10289

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02160-JMR

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Santos Herrera-Magana appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

51-month sentence for re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Herrera-Magana’s counsel

FILED

APR 18 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10289

has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We

dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d

1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

DISMISSED.
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2024 43842340 0 20 2024 6512395700 0 30 2024 4000867200 0 40 2024 21590480 0 50 2024 248690560 0 60 2024 488238600 0
#### STATE ex rel. Louis DABON v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2037.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Dabon, Louis; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus or habeas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 246-701.

Granted. From the transcript of his remarks at sentencing, it is unclear whether the trial judge was aware of his sentencing alternatives at the time but chose not to exercise them in that particular case. Accordingly, relator’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accord with the law.

DIXON, C.J., and WATSON, J., dissent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00107-CR

Andrew GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007CR4638

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 27, 2012

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

 PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 48 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 48

Designating the week beginning March 7, 1999, as ``National Girl Scout 
                                Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 23, 1999

 Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Abraham, 
 Mr. Gramm, Mr. Kerry, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Warner, Mr. Bond, Mr. Kohl, 
Mr. Burns, Mr. Lugar, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Dorgan, 
   Mr. Edwards, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Levin, Mr. Reid, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
   Lautenberg, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Smith of 
Oregon, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Specter) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 2, 1999

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week beginning March 7, 1999, as ``National Girl Scout 
                                Week''.

Whereas March 12, 1999, is the 87th anniversary of the founding of the Girl 
        Scouts of the United States of America;
Whereas on March 16, 1950, the Girl Scouts became the first national 
        organization for girls to be granted a Federal charter by Congress;
Whereas through annual reports required to be submitted to Congress by its 
        charter, the Girl Scouts regularly informs Congress of its progress and 
        program initiatives;
Whereas the Girl Scouts is dedicated to inspiring girls and young women with the 
        highest ideals of character, conduct, and service to others so that they 
        may become model citizens in their communities;
Whereas the Girl Scouts offers girls aged 5 through 17 a variety of 
        opportunities to develop strong values and life skills and provides a 
        wide range of activities to meet girls' interests and needs;
Whereas the Girl Scouts has a membership of nearly 3,000,000 girls and over 
        850,000 adult volunteers, and is one of the preeminent organizations in 
        the United States committed to girls growing strong in mind, body, and 
        spirit; and
Whereas by fostering in girls and young women the qualities on which the 
        strength of the United States depends, the Girl Scouts, for 87 years, 
        has significantly contributed to the advancement of the United States: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning March 7, 1999, as 
        ``National Girl Scout Week''; and
            (2) requests the President to issue a proclamation 
        designating the week beginning March 7, 1999, as ``National 
        Girl Scout Week'' and calling on the people of the United 
        States to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and 
        activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Calvin L. FOX, Appellant, v. Emilia Diaz FOX, Appellee.

No. 87-2110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 9, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 5, 1988.

Calvin L. Fox, in pro. per.

Emilia Diaz Fox, in pro. per., and Brian R. Hersh, Miami, for appellee.

*971Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse that portion of a child custody and visitation order which placed the mother in charge of personally supervising the former husband’s visitation with their son. In most cases where supervised child visitation is required, it is counterproductive for both the parties and the court to place one parent in charge of monitoring the other parent’s visitation of the child. For the parents, such an arrangement affords the needless opportunity to provoke lingering animosity. From the trial court’s perspective,' when modification of such a visitation order is sought, there is no neutral and objective monitor to apprise the court regarding the parents’ discharge of their visitation obligations and rights. For these reasons, the order is reversed with directions that the trial court appoint a suitably neutral and impartial party to be present at and monitor paternal visitation. In all other respects, the order is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for the year ended December 31, 2003, I,
LuAnn D. Hanson, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance of
RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

    (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION for the year December 31, 2003, fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
         RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for the year ended December 31,
         2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION.


By:  /S/ LuAnn D. Hanson
    ------------------------
    LUANN D. HANSON
    Chief Financial Officer and
    Vice President of Finance

March 25, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ramtron International Corporation and will be retained by Ramtron
International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    Page-1
<PAGE>
#### Theresa Berger, Plaintiff, *v.*Nathan Berger, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 20, 1959.

*Darnel H. Greenberg*for plaintiff.

*Nathan Berger,*defendant in person.

Vincent A. Lupiano, J.

The court by interim decision dated February 17, 1959 (16 Mise 2d 150) overruled the technical objection to the service of plaintiff’s cross motion and afforded the defendant time within which to submit opposing affidavits on the merits. This the defendant has failed to do. Accordingly, disposition of the cross motion is held in abeyance pending the report of the Official Referee, who is designated' to hear the proof of the parties and report with his recommendations as to the plaintiff’s needs and the defendant’s assets, income and ability to pay in respect to items 1 and 3 of the plaintiff’s cross motion and as to whether Unusual circumstances exist which would require the defendant to support his child beyond the period of emancipation; and if any, their extent and need, together with the financial ability of the defendant to make such support payments. Further disposition of the relief requested in the cross motions is held in abeyance pending the Referee’s report.