alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3209

___________ James M. Rush, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Metropolitan Council Transit * Operations, a political subdivision, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 15, 2001 Filed: July 5, 2001

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MAGILL, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James M. Rush appeals the district court's 1 grant of summary judgment for the Metropolitan Council Transit Operations ("MCTO") in Rush's employment discriminationaction. Rush alleged that the MCTO refused to hire him because it regarded him as disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The district court concluded that the MCTO did not-2-

regardRush as disabled because the MCTO's decision that Rush was unable to perform one job, that of part-time bus driver, did not support a conclusion that he was limited in the substantial life activity of "working." After a careful examination of the record, this court finds that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the MCTO. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's thorough opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 366

   Expressing the Sense of the Senate on the certification of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 4 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Kyl, Mr. 
  Domenici, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hollings, and Mr. Sessions) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the Sense of the Senate on the certification of Mexico.

Whereas Mexico will inaugurate a new government on 1 December 2000 that will be 
        the first change of authority from one party to another;
Whereas the 2nd July election of Vincente Fox Quesada of the Alliance for Change 
        marks an historic transition of power in open and fair elections;
Whereas Mexico and the United States share a 2,000-mile border, Mexico is the 
        United States' second largest trading partner, and the two countries 
        share historic and cultural ties;
Whereas drug production and trafficking are a threat to the national interests 
        and the well-being of the citizens of both countries; and
Whereas United States-Mexican cooperation on drugs is a cornerstone for policy 
        for both countries in developing effective programs to stop drug use, 
        drug production, and drug trafficking: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That (a) the Senate, on behalf of the people of the 
United States--
            (1) welcomes the constitutional transition of power in 
        Mexico;
            (2) congratulates the people of Mexico and their elected 
        representatives for this historic change; and
            (3) expresses its intent to continue to work cooperatively 
        with Mexican authorities to promote broad and effective efforts 
        for the health and welfare of United States and Mexican 
        citizens endangered by international drug trafficking, use, and 
        production.
    (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the 
incoming new governments in both Mexico and the United States must 
develop and implement a counterdrug program that more effectively 
addresses the official corruption, the increase in drug traffic, and 
the lawlessness that has resulted from illegal drug trafficking, and 
that a one-year waiver of the requirement that the President certify 
Mexico is warranted to permit both new governments time to do so.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tri Vu Truong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 13thday of August, 2009                                                                                                                   
|   

TRI VU TRUONGTri Vu TruongChief Executive Officer












---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Mason GODFREY.

No. 86-K-2370.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1987.

In re Godfrey, Mason; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. OR 86-41; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 2614-84, 2614-84-A.

Prior report: La.App., 495 So.2d 956.

Granted and remanded to Court of Appeal for rehearing. Judge KING is re-cused from sitting on the case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                             5,417
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      37,040
<ALLOWANCES>                       6,522
<INVENTORY>                        1,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   51,284
<PP&E>                             375,538
<DEPRECIATION>                     71,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     465,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              56,326
<BONDS>                            164,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        1
<COMMON>                           321
<OTHER-SE>                         191,772
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       465,763
<SALES>                            68,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   68,102
<CGS>                              40,779
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      40,779
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   19,638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 2,295
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    5,390
<INCOME-TAX>                       2,342
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                3,048
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       3,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.05




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form S-3 Nos. 333-118516, 333-118516-01, 333-133515 and 333-133515-01) and related Prospectus of (i) Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for the registration of preferred stock, common stock, depository shares, warrants andguarantees and (ii) Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. for the registration of debt securities of our reports (a) dated February 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., Plum CreekTimber Company, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., and (b) datedFebruary 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P., and we also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-67382) and related Prospectusof Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. for registration of common stock issuable upon exercise of Georgia Pacific Corporation-Timber Group options, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71192) pertaining to the Georgia-Pacific Corporation1995 Long-term Incentive Plan and Georgia-Pacific Corporation/Timber Group 1997 Long-term Incentive Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59812) pertaining to the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., andin the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-123146) pertaining to the Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan of our reports dated February 16, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc., Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of PlumCreek Timber Company, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/Ernst & Young LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

February 23, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

HEWLETT

- PACKARD COMPANY, §

§ No. 243, 2015

Defendant Below, §

Appellant/Cross

- Appellee, §

§ Court Below : Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

v. § in and for New Castle County

§

PROFESSIONAL INVESTIGATION § C.A. No. N 12C

- 06

- 196

& CONSULTING AGENCY, INC., §

d/b/a PICA, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee /Cross

- Appellant. §

Submitted: December 2

, 2015

Decided: December 4 , 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice ; VALIHURA, and SEITZ , Justices.

ORDER

On this 4 th day of December

, 2015 , the Court

, having carefully considered

this matter after oral argument and on the briefs filed by the parties

, has determined

that the factual findings of the jury are supported by the evidence and the Superior

Cour t did not err in its legal determinations.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

Justice
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

The Honorable Velva L. Price Civil District Clerk 

### Travis County Courthouse P.O.Box 1748 Austin, TX 78767 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * 

# Court ofAppeals Third District ofTexas P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547 www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx (512) 463-1733



### IT Marcrr5T2015 JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK



### RE: CourtofAppeals Number: 03-11-00735-CV and 03-11-00736-CV Trial Court Case Number: D-l-GN-10-002867 and D-l-GN-10-001389 

### Style: Texas State Board ofChiropractic Examiners v. Greg Abbott, Attorney General ofthe State ofTexas
Dear Honorable Velva L. Price: 

### The Third Court ofAppeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning the following original exhibits: SEALED: Plaintiffs exhibits Iand M; Defendant's exhibit2.
Very truly yours,
Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk Filed in The District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

### MAR 1 2 2015 At M. Velva L. Price, DistrictClerk 

## /v\P
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office

(512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9420 (512) 854-9669

fax: 854-4744 fax: 854-9549 fax: 854-4566 fax: 854-4457

Amalia Rodriguez -Mendoza

Travis County District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse Complex

P.O. Box 1748

Austin, Texas 78767

March 27, 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle

Third Court of Appeals

P.O. BOX 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

Dear Mr. Kyle;

Re: D-1-GN-09-001428

A clerk’s record in cause number TEXAS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE 

GUARANTY VS CORPSOL INC., CORPORATE SOLUTIONS INC., ET AL, was due in your 

office on MARCH 6, 2015 and payment was received in our office on March 11, 2015; therefore I 

will need to request an extension to file the record with your office.

If you have any question please contact me at (512) 854-5880.

Thank you,

Sincerely, 

Patsy Ybarra

Deputy Court Clerk, 

(512) 854-5880

cc: Court file
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 165

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that continual

research and education into the cause and curefor fibroid tumors be addressed.

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. CON. RES. 165

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the vast majority of fibroids occur in women of reproductive age, and between 20 and 40 percent of women

are diagnosed;

Whereas African American women are twice as likely to be

diagnosed with fibroids than Caucasian women;
2

•HCON 165 EH

Whereas fibroids are the most frequently diagnosed tumor of

the female pelvis and range in size from 1mm to more

than 20cm (8 inches) in diameter;

Whereas they are not associated with cancer and almost

never develop into cancer (less than one percent becoming

malignant);

Whereas the symptoms of fibroids can include excessive

bleeding during menstrual periods, spotting or bleeding

between periods, frequent urination, and/or lower back

pain;

Whereas the preferred method of treatment for fibroids is a

hysterectomy, which is the complete removal of the uterus, leaving the woman unable to bear children for the

rest of her life;

Whereas diets rich in fatty foods have been a contributing

factor to an increased risk in fibroid tumors;

Whereas there are alternative methods to a hysterectomy

available, but they are less permanent, and have menopausal symptoms;

Whereas, in cases of hormonal treatment, the fibroids will regrow should the treatment cease; and

Whereas research conducted by the National Institute of Environmental Health indicated that while estrogen and

progesterone are contributing factors, fibroids can be targeted by environmental chemicals whose effects are mediated through the estrogen and/or progesterone receptors:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That—
3

•HCON 165 EH

1 (1) the Congress recognizes the health and edu2 cational needs of women in the United States who

3 may be suffering from fibroids;

4 (2) it is the sense of the Congress that the med5 ical community should explore alternatives to

6 hysterectomies in greater detail, so that women who

7 choose to bear children in their lives may do so,

8 while eliminating recurring fibroids; and

9 (3) the Congress—

10 (A) encourages women to pay greater at11 tention to their reproductive health by making

12 regular visits to their OB/GYNs; and

13 (B) encourages women and their physi14 cians to know all safe options available for the

15 prevention and cure of fibroids.

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2002.

Attest:

Clerk.
FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T J ANUARY 20, 2010 J OHN L EY ACTI NG CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 0 9- 11 41 4 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 9 7- 00 09 8- CR-T-2 7TGW UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us ERIC S. HARRI S, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Mi dd le Dis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (J anua ry 20 , 20 10 ) Befo re EDMONDSON, BIRC H andBLACK, Cir cu itJu dg es . PER CURI AM: Mary A. Mil ls , app oi nt edco un se l fo r Eric S. Harri s i n thi s d ire ctcri m in al ap pe al , has m ov edto withdraw fro m furth er re pr es en ta ti on of t he ap pe ll an t an dfil eda br ie f pu rs ua ntto And ers v. Ca li fo rn ia , 38 6 U.S. 7 38 , 87 S.Ct . 13 96 , 18

L.Ed.2 d 4 93 (19 67 ). Our i nd ep en de ntrev ie w of the en ti re re co rdrev eal s tha t co un se l’s as se ss m en t o f th e rel at iv e m eri t o f th e ap pe al is co rrec t. Bec au se in de pe nd en t ex am in at io n o f th e en ti re rec or d re ve al s n o arg uabl e is su es of m eri t, co un se l’s m ot io n t o wi th dr aw is GRANTED , andHarri s’s co nv ic ti on an d se nt en ce i s AFFIRMED .

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

IN RE: RONALD DANDAR :

:

:

No. 79 WM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary Relief 

and the Application for Relief are DENIED.
#### Valentine Unemployment Compensation Case.

Argued March 22, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ,

*575
      *David Freeman,*for appellant.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

April 12, 1962:

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an unemployment compensation case in which the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all concluded that the claimant was not entitled to benefits under the provisions of §402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §S02(a), when she refused to accept several referrals of suitable work.

The claimant, Mary G. Valentine, was last employed by Delaware Valley Wool Scouring Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as a general office worker, at $100 per week. It should be noted that the record discloses that the corporation was owned and controlled by her father. She was laid off on September 2, 1960. She was offered two referrals as an assistant bookkeeper at salaries of $50 and $60, respectively, after she had been unemployed for more than four months. She refused to accept either referral because the salary was insufficient.

As we said in *Lorenzi Unemployment Compensation Case,*197 Pa. Superior Ct. 573, 180 A. 2d 84 (1962), “. . . the good cause necessary for refusing proffered work rests on the good faith of the claimant, which includes conduct which is consistent with the genuine desire to work and be self supporting.” This claimant’s conduct is not consistent with this definition of good *576cause. *Weiland Unemployment Compensation Case,*167 Pa. Superior Ct. 554, 76 A. 2d 457 (1950); *Bentz Unemployment Compensation Case,*190 Pa. Superior Ct. 582, 155 A. 2d 461 (1959); *D’Amato Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 76, 173 A. 2d 680 (1961).

Decision affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>







<ARTICLE>                        5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                              <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                           16,667
<SECURITIES>                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                    130,386
<ALLOWANCES>                     6,353
<INVENTORY>                      7,349
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 175,385
<PP&E>                           1,038,782
<DEPRECIATION>                   134,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   2,028,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            184,783
<BONDS>                          1,425,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      1
<COMMON>                         995
<OTHER-SE>                       207,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     2,028,699
<SALES>                          417,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 417,141
<CGS>                            233,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    233,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 102,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               46,116
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  34,453
<INCOME-TAX>                     14,647
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              19,806
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  52,412
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                    (32,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.36)



</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary

EPA/Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.

May 4, 2011, 10:00 AM to 11:00 AM

Room S-8621, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.: Teri Muchow, John Butala

Participants

EPA: Nader Elkassabany, Tim Leighton, Mark Hartman, Jonathan Chen, Lance 

Wormell, Rebecca von dem Hagen

On Wednesday, May 4, 2011 AD hosted a meeting with Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. 

to discuss the sodium fluoride data call-in issued as a result of the 2007 reregistration 

eligibility decision (RED). Osmose requested the meeting to explore options for 

fulfilling the data requirements being called in through the Generic Data Call-In (GDCI) 

issued in February 2010. During the meeting, the registrant presented an overview of the 

manufacturing and application processes of two end use products.

Summary

EPA will continue to work with Osmose to address concerns with the GDCI. Osmose 

will submit a follow-up letter to the Agency.

Next Steps
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2008



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.