alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED JUNE 6, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ZHll 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

HELOAIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2012-0472 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

MM b 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA210081) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. -----~ 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Whit Baldwin, President 

Heloair, Inc., Respondent 

5721 Gulfstream Road 

Richmond, VA 23250 

TEL: 804-226-3400 

FAX: 804-226-3494 

ONE COPY 

Zachery M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 " 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0472 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 

For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**Neurogen      Corporation**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

|   | 1. | I                am the President and Chief Executive Officer of Neurogen Corporation                (the                "Company"). |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                the best of my knowledge: |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------|

|   | a. | The                Company's Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for                the year                ended December 31, 2006 accompanying this Certification, in the form                filed                with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully                complies                with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:                April 30, 2007 | By:                /s/ William H. Koster |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                      | ------------------------                 |
|                                      | William                H. Koster         |
|                                      | President                and             |
|                                      | Chief                Executive Officer   |
#### Charles TEAGUE v. SAWYER DRILLING COMPANY et al.

No. 86-C-0579.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Halliburton Services — Third Party; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17617-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 306122.

Prior report: La.App., 485 So.2d 204.

Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for reconsideration in the light of *Berry v. Holston Well Service,*488 So.2d 934 (La.1986).
# Úřední věstník C 146/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 146 |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 634. května 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 146

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 634. května 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informace |
| | INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE |
| | Evropská komise |
| 2020/C 146/01 | Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 30. dubna 2020 | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

IV   Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

2020/C 146/01

Směnné kurzy vůči euru — 30. dubna 2020

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

IV Informace

INFORMACE ORGÁNŮ, INSTITUCÍ A JINÝCH SUBJEKTŮ EVROPSKÉ UNIE

Evropská komise

| 4.5.2020 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | C 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2020

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

C 146/1

---

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

30. dubna 2020

(2020/C 146/01)

1 euro =

| | měna | směnný kurz |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | americký dolar | 1,0876 |
| JPY | japonský jen | 115,87 |
| DKK | dánská koruna | 7,4584 |
| GBP | britská libra | 0,86905 |
| SEK | švédská koruna | 10,6639 |
| CHF | švýcarský frank | 1,0558 |
| ISK | islandská koruna | 159,30 |
| NOK | norská koruna | 11,1840 |
| BGN | bulharský lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | česká koruna | 27,097 |
| HUF | maďarský forint | 352,72 |
| PLN | polský zlotý | 4,5336 |
| RON | rumunský lei | 4,8431 |
| TRY | turecká lira | 7,5979 |
| AUD | australský dolar | 1,6598 |
| CAD | kanadský dolar | 1,5077 |
| HKD | hongkongský dolar | 8,4300 |
| NZD | novozélandský dolar | 1,7705 |
| SGD | singapurský dolar | 1,5324 |
| KRW | jihokorejský won | 1 313,09 |
| ZAR | jihoafrický rand | 19,6572 |
| CNY | čínský juan | 7,6665 |
| HRK | chorvatská kuna | 7,5790 |
| IDR | indonéská rupie | 16 178,05 |
| MYR | malajsijský ringgit | 4,6767 |
| PHP | filipínské peso | 54,772 |
| RUB | ruský rubl | 79,8920 |
| THB | thajský baht | 35,216 |
| BRL | brazilský real | 5,8565 |
| MXN | mexické peso | 25,7953 |
| INR | indická rupie | 81,6108 |

měna

směnný kurz

USD

americký dolar

1,0876

JPY

japonský jen

115,87

DKK

dánská koruna

7,4584

GBP

britská libra

0,86905

SEK

švédská koruna

10,6639

CHF

švýcarský frank

1,0558

ISK

islandská koruna

159,30

NOK

norská koruna

11,1840

BGN

bulharský lev

1,9558

CZK

česká koruna

27,097

HUF

maďarský forint

352,72

PLN

polský zlotý

4,5336

RON

rumunský lei

4,8431

TRY

turecká lira

7,5979

AUD

australský dolar

1,6598

CAD

kanadský dolar

1,5077

HKD

hongkongský dolar

8,4300

NZD

novozélandský dolar

1,7705

SGD

singapurský dolar

1,5324

KRW

jihokorejský won

1 313,09

ZAR

jihoafrický rand

19,6572

CNY

čínský juan

7,6665

HRK

chorvatská kuna

7,5790

IDR

indonéská rupie

16 178,05

MYR

malajsijský ringgit

4,6767

PHP

filipínské peso

54,772

RUB

ruský rubl

79,8920

THB

thajský baht

35,216

BRL

brazilský real

5,8565

MXN

mexické peso

25,7953

INR

indická rupie

81,6108

---

(1)  Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

---
From: MaryAnn Porter <maporter@ytttribe.org>

Sent: Wednesday, July 2, 2014 2:50 PM

To: TASreinterpretation Subject: attention Fred Leutner



# 1. (NEW) Pre

- proposal tribal consultation period extended to July 7 for : Potential Proposed Rule to reinterpret Clean Water Act (CWA) Statutory Provisions Regarding Treatment of Tribes in a Manner Similar to a State (TAS)

– closes July 7

Can you tell me if this is only for tribes with reservations.

Dáxnáxdusaayi Suuyuk

- Mary Porter
Tribal Environmental Director Yakutat Tlingit Tribe PO Box 418, Yakutat AK 99689 (907) P 784

- 3238 X 107 F 784

- 3595 “Love and Graditude, that’s what it is”
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our reports dated May 20, 2005, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule and management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
Annual Report of New Frontier Media Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
of said reports in the Registration Statement of New Frontier Media Inc. and
Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (No. 333-102694).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
New York, New York
May 20, 2005
WWW.EXFILE.COM, INC -- 13734 -- DSL.NET, INC. -- EXHIBIT 10.2 TO FORM 10-Q


    
Exhibit
      10.2

    


    Director
      Compensation Summary

    


    


    Compensation
      for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors is payable quarterly in equal
      installments only to the Company’s outside directors, as follows (pursuant to
      policies adopted by the Board in March 2004):

    


    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $20,000;

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                aggregate annual meeting fee of $10,000, paid as a flat fee, based
                on an
                assumed number of meetings; 

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $7,500 for each Audit Committee
                member;

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $5,000 for the Chairman of the Audit
                Committee;

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $5,000 for each Compensation Committee
                member;

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $2,500 for the Chairman of the Compensation
                Committee;

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $2,000 for each Nominating Committee member;
                and

            


    

    
      	·  	
                  an
                annual retainer of $1,000 for the Chairman of the Nominating
                Committee.

            


    

    


    The
      Company’s Board of Directors has not established a program for scheduled awards
      of equity-based compensation to Directors; rather, such awards are granted
      from
      time to time in the discretion of the Board of Directors. The
      Company’s standard form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for directors of
      the Company is filed with the Commission as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on From 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending December 24, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0232.
    Date Filed: December 20, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 10, 2012.

Description

    Application of Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. notifying the 
Department, pursuant to the requirements of 14 CFR 215.4, of a change 
in the carrier's name to ``ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.'' and requesting 
the reissuance of its certificates of public convenience and necessity 
and other economic authorities and requests that the trade names 
``ASA,'' ``Atlantic Southeast,'' and ``Atlantic Southeast Airlines, 
Inc.'' be registered for use in its operations.

Renee V. Wright,
 Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-683 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 32.1



                     Certification Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strategic
Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John P. O'Shea, President of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results or operations of the
        Company.



/s/ JOHN P. O'SHEA                                               March 31, 2015
---------------------------------
John P. O'Shea
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 19, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00563

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.G., A CHILD

From the County Court at Law

, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09352C

Honorable Susan Harris , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s br ief is currently due April 12, 2021. On March 18, 2021, appellee filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief until May 12, 2021, for a total extension of thirty days. After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellee to file its brief by May 12, 2021.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of March, 2021

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz
, Clerk of Court
#### Gottfried Wittwer, Respondent, *v.*Louis L. Hurwitz et al., Trading under the Name of Hurwitz Bros. Iron and Metal Company, Appellants.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 216 N. Y. 259.)
#### W.W. GILMAN, Appellant, v. The SANDAGE COMPANIES, Appellee.

No. 85-2199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1986.

James D. Adams of Quinton, Lummus, Dunwody & Adams, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Louis X. Amato of Maclean, Amato, Ar-len & Anderson, Naples, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this suit against the guarantor of a promissory note we reverse the award of attorney’s fees which were granted at a hearing for which there had been inadequate notice.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6963

WARREN CHASE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JACKY HENDRICKS, Classification Counselor;

RICHARD WARREN; MR. ADAMS; DR. CATCHER; DR.

ANAWAILLEY; MR. CRAIG; MR. PATTERSON; BOB

CRAFT; R. BOND; DR. SHAPIRO; M. MUNGAI; DR.

MEILLER; JOSEPH HENNEBERRY; ARCHIE GEE; ROBERT

SPANGLER; THOMAS R. CORCORAN; SMITH, Assistant

Warden; MRS. SORENSON; JOHN SWIVEL; MS.

FAUNTLEROY; SWENDOLIN DUCKETT; MR. THEADWELL;

RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; EUGENE M. NUTH; JACK

KAVANAGH; JOSEPH ZBOZIEN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA97-2966-CCB)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: November 10, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant

Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We presume for the purpose of this appeal that Appellant

deposited this document and his subsequent notice on appeal in the

prison’s internal mail system on the date the documents were

prepared. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988).

3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order disposing of the complaint on March 31, 1998. On May 2, 1998, Appellant filed a pleading construed by the court as a motion for reconsideration.* Because it was filed more than ten days after the March 31 order, the

motion did not toll the thirty-day appeal period in which to file

a notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). The district court

denied the motion on May 18, 1998; Appellant’s notice of appeal was

filed on June 25, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal

period as to both the March 31 order and the May 18 order. Appel-
4

lant’s failure to note a timely appeal or to obtain an extension of

the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the

appeal. We deny Appellant’s motion for an injunction or a temporary

restraining order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 35

    Relating to the treatment of veterans with Alzheimer's disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 1999

Ms. Snowe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Relating to the treatment of veterans with Alzheimer's disease.

Whereas an estimated 30 percent of the patients in veterans nursing home 
        facilities suffer from Alzheimer's Disease or some other form of 
        dementia;
Whereas only a very small number of facilities exist that are dedicated to 
        treating patients with Alzheimer's disease and to developing improved 
        protocols to treat the disorder;
Whereas the aging of the United States veterans population is expected to hinder 
        the capability of traditional veterans nursing home facilities to care 
        for veterans with Alzheimer's disease; and
Whereas research indicates that the traditional nursing home model may not 
        provide the most effective method of treating patients with Alzheimer's 
        disease: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) in authorizing medical facility projects and leases for 
        the Department of Veterans Affairs, Congress should authorize 
        projects and leases for facilities, in urban and rural 
        locations, that are designed specifically for purposes of 
        treating veterans with Alzheimer's disease and conducting 
        research relating to Alzheimer's disease;
            (2) the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should encourage 
        innovation in the methods utilized by Department health care 
        personnel in treating veterans with Alzheimer's disease; and
            (3) the Secretary should encourage and facilitate the 
        sharing of information on Alzheimer's disease among Department 
        facilities and personnel.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 22, 2016

NO. 03-14-00488-CR

Stewart Lindsay Sherrod, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond D. Martz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Raymond D. Martz   
|Raymond D. Martz       
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 1, 2006       



35