alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**BEFORE THE**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**WASHINGTON, D. C.**

----------------------------------------------- Joint Application of :

:

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. :

and : DOT

- OST

- 2011

-

HAINAN AIRLINES CO., LIMITED :

:

under l4 CFR Part 2l2 for statements of :

of authorization and under 49 USC 40109 :

for related exemption authority (reciprocal :

codesharing) :

-----------------------------------------------

**JOINT MOT**  **ION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.**  **AND**

**HAINAN AIRLINES CO., LIMITED**  **TO SHORTEN THE ANSWER DATE**

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

For Hainan Airlines : For American Airlines:

Joel M. Chusid Virasb Vahidi

General Manager, North America Senior Vice President

- Hainan Airlines Co., Limited Marketing and Planning and

18000 International Blvd. Chief Commercial Officer

Suite 1188 American Airlines, Inc.

Seattle, W A 98188 P.O. Box 619616, MD 5634

joel@hnair.com DFW Airport, Texas 75261

Josh Romanow William K. Ris, Jr.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Senior Vice President

-

Pittman LLP Government Affairs

2300 N Street, N.W. American Airlines, Inc.

Washington, D.C. 20037 1101 17 th Street, N.W.

(202) 663

- 8000 Suite 600

romanow@pillsburylaw.com Washington, D.C. 20036Kenji C. Hashimoto

Vice President

– S trategic

Alliances

American Airlines, Inc.

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5634

DFW Airport, Texas 75261

Robert A. Wirick

Director, Regulatory Affairs

American Airlines, Inc.

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635

DFW Airport, Texas 75261

(817) 963

- 0394

robert.wirick@aa.com

Carl B. Nelson

Associate General Counsel

American Airlines, Inc.

1101 17 th Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C. 20036

(202) 496

- 5647

carl.nelson@aa.com

December 13

, 2011**BEFORE THE**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**WASHINGTON, D. C.**

--------------------------------------------- -- Joint Application of :

:

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. :

and : DOT

- OST

- 2011

-

HAINAN AIRLINES CO., LIMI TED : 0228

:

under l4 CFR Part 2l2 for statement s of :

of authorization and under 49 USC 40109 :

for related exemption authority ( reciprocal :

codesharing) :

--------------------------------------------- --

**JOINT MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. AND** 

**HAINAN AIRLINES CO., LIMITED TO SHORTEN THE ANSWER DATE**

American Airlines, Inc. an d Hainan Airlines Co., Limited

hereby jointly move to shorten the answer date in this docket

from December 27, 2011, to December 16, 2 011.

American and Hainan Airlines filed the captioned joint

application on December 8, 2011. We polled the carrier parties

named on the service list a nd received non

- objections from all

but one.

We believe that our request for a shortened answer

period should be granted in the public inter est of expediting

the exercise of bilateral air rights that are clearly provided

by the U.S.

- China Civil Air Transport Agreement, as amended.- 2

-

Respectful ly submitted,

Josh Romanow Carl B. Nelson

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Associate General Counsel

Pittman LLC American Airlines, Inc.

Counsel for Hainan Airlines

Co., Limited

December 13

, 2011
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                 |                                     |
|-----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                               |                            |                                |
| Date: August              15, 2005 | By:                        | /s/ Robert              M. Blodgett |
|  Name:                        | Robert              M. Blodgett      |
|  Title:                       | Chief              Financial Officer |
#### Lawrence TEEHAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 84-842

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 6, 1986.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Mark J. Ber-kowitz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JOR-GENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted of battery on a law enforcement officer. The trial judge increased the points under the guidelines and aggravated the sentence of the appellant to five years and thereby departed from the guidelines. His reasons for departure were punishment and deterrence.

We reverse and remand for resen-tencing. It was error to score additional points for victim injury when there was no evidence of same and it was not an essential element of the crime. *Holloman v. State,*482 So.2d 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); *Inscore v. State,*480 So.2d 218, 219 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); *Whitfield v. State,*471 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). It was also error to aggravate the sentence for the reasons pronounced. *Albritton v. State,*476 So.2d 158 (Fla.1985); *Cawthon v. State,*486 So.2d 90 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); *Patty v. State,*486 So.2d 16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); *Battles v. State,*482 So.2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
#### Jose A. ROJAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 1988.

Max P. Engel and Kenneth Speiller, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no merit in appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish his participation in a conspiracy, that the trial court erred in admitting audio tapes into evidence, and that error appeared in the admission of evidence of other crimes, we affirm his convictions of attempt to traffic in cannabis and conspiracy *1180to traffic in cannabis. *See United States v. Martin,*794 F.2d 1531 (11th Cir.1986); *Munroe v. State,*514 So.2d 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), *review denied,*519 So.2d 987 (Fla.1988); *State v. Morales,*460 So.2d 410 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The state concedes that appellant’s attempted trafficking conviction, incorrectly cited as a first degree felony, should be corrected to appear as a second degree felony. We remand for that purpose.

Affirmed as modified.
Nasser Series C Subscription Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 Subscription Agreement 
 for Placement of Avicena Group, Inc. Units 
  
 By its execution and
delivery of this subscription agreement, the undersigned Subscriber hereby joins in and agrees to purchase the aggregate number of Units set forth below: 
  

					
	    102,000    	  	Units, each consisting on One Share of Series C Preferred Stock and one Warrant (exercisable for $0.01 to purchase One additional Share of Common Stock) at $1.00 per Unit, for an aggregate
purchase price of:	    	$102,000    

  

					
			
	/s/ Nasser Menhall	 	 	 	August 15, 2004
	Signature	 	 	 	Date

  
 Nasser Menhall

 Investor or Investing Entity Name 
  

					
	 C/o World Care One Cambridge Ctr.
 Cambridge, MA
02142
	  	(617) 250-5161	  	 __________________________

	Investor’s Address	  	Telephone	  	Fax

  

					
	 Please wire your subscription to:
 Sachnoff & Weaver, Ltd.
 Client Escrow Account

	 		 
	ACCOUNT NAME:	  	 Sachnoff & Weaver Ltd.
	  	 
	 ACCOUNT NUMBER:
 BANK NAME:
 ABA ROUTING NUMBER:
	  	 1894668
 Northern Trust Bank
 071000152
	  	 
	REMARKS:	  	 Avicena Private Placement
	  	 
	 		 
	Note:	  	 Call Gail Carone at (312) 651-1515
	  	 

  
 Please indicate the name of the
investor or investing entity on the wire transfer so that we may more easily identify the transferor. Funds should be wired in US Dollars. In addition, please note that the wire transfer fees may be taken out of the funds that are wired and that
sufficient funds should be wired to cover these fees. This form should be telefaxed to the following with the original to follow by mail. 
  

					
	 Ms. Gail Carone
 Fax: 312-207-6400
  










			
	 Agreed and accepted to as to
 102,000 Units at $1.00 per share:
  
 AVICENA GROUP, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Nasser Menhall

	 Name:
	 	 Nasser Menhall

	 Title:
	 	 President

		
	 Date:
	 	 August 15, 2004
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert M. Blodgett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/
      Robert M.
      Blodgett


Name:
      Robert M. Blodgett


Title:
      Chief Financial Officer


Date:  August
      11, 2006
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO





18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Hawk Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph J. Levanduski,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial position and result of operations of the Company.














/s/ JOSEPH J.
LEVANDUSKI


Joseph J.
Levanduski


Chief Financial
Officer





March10,
2009





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, subject to the
knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other
purpose.























































































113
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David J.
Keefe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
November 12, 2009



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|    |  | David J. Keefe                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### In re ESTATE OF Dante Frances DeMARCHIS, deceased.

No. 87-1496.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 1988.

Calvin W. Wilson, Pensacola, for appellant, Ronald Frances DeMarchis.

John R. Meeks, of Collins, Dennis & Williams, Pensacola, for appellee, Elsie Adams.

MILLS, Judge.

The personal representative of the estate of the decedent appeals from an order admitting a will to probate. He contends: (1) the instrument was not a will at all but, at best, evidence of an intention to make a will in the future; (2) the instrument and attesting witness oaths were not properly executed; and (3) the will is void due to the *382divorce of the decedent from the beneficiary after execution of the instrument.

We find no merit in the first two contentions. We do not reach the third because there is nothing in the record indicating that the trial court has yet considered it. It may be raised, if necessary, in a subsequent appeal.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of QC Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas E. Nickerson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: August 12, 2005



/s/ Douglas E. NickersonDouglas E. NickersonChief Financial Officer




Page 36
#### Raymond ROCHON v. CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Auto Owners Insurance Company.

No. 87-CP-0006.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Rochon, Raymond; applying for writ of certiorari; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-788; Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”.

Prior report: La.App., 497 So.2d 746.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000848448
<NAME>                        Dakota Mining Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               5,092
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                          2,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9,361
<PP&E>                                              36,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      31,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,355
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            52,810
<OTHER-SE>                                            (280)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        31,569
<SALES>                                             24,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    24,556
<CGS>                                               26,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       47,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (23,070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (23,070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (23,070)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
IN RE THE MOTION OF PAUL ROBIN 

SCHEELE FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF 

THE STATE OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Paul Robin Scheele has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of 

Montana pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar 

Admissions Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the 

Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Scheele has provided the necessary 

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion 

under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, Paul Robin Scheele may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. Y_,\r> 

DATED this day of April, 2022. 

Chief Justice 
( /% 4°. 

4C2 i 4 1 4ft ft. 

Justices 

2
NUMBER 13-11-00358-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ARROYO COLORADO, APPELLANT,

v.

THOMAS M. MCMURRAY, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 105th District Court 

of Kleberg County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Arroyo Colorado, appealed a judgment entered by the 105th District 

Court of Kleberg County, Texas. On June 13, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified 

appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.5(e). See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5(e). The Clerk directed appellant to file an 

amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of 
2

that notice. On October 12, 2011, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not 

been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect 

were not cured within ten days. The notice was sent to appellant’s address by certified 

mail return receipt requested; however, the certified mail was returned as unclaimed and 

unable to forward. Subsequently, the Clerk of the Court sent the notice to appellant by 

regular mail on November 15, 2011. Appellant has not responded to the notice or 

corrected the defect.

On October 7, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant, in accordance with 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the 

$175.00 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The notice was sent to 

appellant’s address by certified mail return receipt requested; however, the certified mail 

was returned as unclaimed and unable to forward. Subsequently, the Clerk of the Court 

sent the notice to appellant by regular mail on November 15, 2011. Appellant has not 

responded to the notice or paid the $175.00 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s failure to 

respond to this Court’s notices and correct the defect or pay the filing fee, is of the opinion 

that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal 

is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

29th day of December, 2011.
No. 76-5938.

#### Richey *v.*United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.