alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAPCO
                                    FINANCIAL

                                  AMENDMENT #2
                                  ------------
                           TO CAPCO SECURITY AGREEMENT
                           ---------------------------
                                  JULY 18, 2005
                                  -------------


THE OPENING PARAGRAPH AS FOLLOWS:

This Contract of Sale and Security Agreement dated for purposes of reference
July 18, 2005; is between the undersigned, CCI TELECOM, INC., hereinafter called
"CLIENT", and CAPCO FINANCIAL COMPANY- A DIVISION OF GREATER BAY BANK N.A.
hereinafter called "CAPCO", agree as follows:

IS REPLACED BY:

This Contract of Sale and Security Agreement dated for purposes of reference
July 18, 2005; is between the undersigned, CCI TELECOM, INC., AND WHOLLY OWNED
SUBSIDIARIES CONTEMPORARY CONSTRUCTORS, INC. a Texas Corporation, CCI INTEGRATED
SOLUTIONS, INC. a Nevada Corporation, AND BERKSHIRE WIRELESS, INC. a
Massachusetts Corporation hereinafter called "CLIENT", and CAPCO FINANCIAL
COMPANY- A DIVISION OF GREATER BAY BANK N.A. hereinafter called "CAPCO", agree
as follows:

IS REPLACED BY:

This amendment is effective and applicable to invoices purchased after July 18,
2005. All other terms, covenants and conditions will remain in effect and
unchanged.


CAPCO FINANCIAL COMPANY- A DIVISION OF GREATER BAY BANK N.A.

By: /s/ [Illegible]
    ------------------------------------

Title: AVP
       ---------------------------------


CCI TELECOM, INC.

By: /s/ Ray J. Ber
    ------------------------------------

Title:  VP & CFO
       ---------------------------------

Date: 7-28-05
      ----------------------------------


                                 Form Date 6/97
<PAGE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 127

To direct the Secretary of the Senate to request the return of certain papers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

To direct the Secretary of the Senate to request the return

of certain papers.

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate is directed

2 to request the House of Representatives to return the offi3 cial papers on S. 331.

Æ
Fifth Amendment to the Assignment of License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.11 
  
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE AGREEMENT (“Fifth Amendment”) is entered into August 5, 2005
(“Effective Date”) by and between Blast Energy Services, Inc. (formerly known as Verdisys, Inc.), a California corporation (“Blast”) and Maxim TEP, Inc., a Texas Corporation (“Maxim”). 
  
 WHEREAS on March 8, 2005, Blast and Maxim entered into an assignment of license
agreement requiring payments to be made in accordance with a defined payment schedule; 
  
 WHEREAS Maxim has failed to pay Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the total balance due on June 3, 2005, has failed to cure the default within the defined 45 day cure period and has failed to pay the amount by
the extension date of August 5, 2005; 
  
 WHEREAS Maxim has requested an
extended period to pay Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the additional consideration due; 
  
 THEREFORE, in view of the good and valuable consideration stated below, Blast and Maxim agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Extension Period. 

  
 1.1 Blast agrees to extend the period that Maxim has to fund the Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars of the balance due to
August 12, 2005. Failure to pay the Three Hundred and Sixty Five Thousand ($365,000) Dollars on or before August 12, 2005 will result in the lapse of the assignment and forfeiture of all prior consideration. 
  

	2.	Consideration. 

  
 2.1 In consideration of this Extension, Maxim shall pay a delinquency fee of Twenty Five Thousand ($25,000) Dollars on August 5, 2005. 
  
 All other terms of the Assignment of License Agreement and the First, Second,
Third and Fourth Amendment are unchanged and remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. 
  

					
	MAXIM TEP, INC.	  	 	  	 
			
	 /s/ Robert Sepos, CFO
	  	 	  	Aug 5, 2005
	 Robert Sepos, Chief Financial Officer
	  	 	  	Date
			
	BLAST ENERGY SERVICES, INC.	  	 	  	 
			
	 /s/ David M. Adams
	  	 	  	August 5, 2005
	 David Adams, President & Co-CEO
	  	 	  	Date
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/ SHAI N.   GOZANI, M.D., PH.D.                                |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     | Shai N. Gozani,   M.D., Ph.D.                                    |
|     | *Chairman, President and   Chief Executive Officer*              |
|     | * *                                                         |
| * * | * *                                                         |
|     | /s/ THOMAS T.   HIGGINS                                          |
|     | Thomas T. Higgins                                                |
|     | *Senior Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

 

April 28, 2011

 

This certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of 1933.

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH A. STOKES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2177 

[April 22, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 562013CF001081A.

Joseph A. Stokes, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 360 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 360

    To authorize the printing of a document entitled ``Washington's 
                          Farewell Address''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 26 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

Mr. McConnell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
               the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To authorize the printing of a document entitled ``Washington's 
                          Farewell Address''.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION.

    The booklet entitled ``Washington's Farewell Address'', prepared by 
the Senate Historical Office under the direction of the Secretary of 
the Senate, shall be printed as a Senate document.

SEC. 2. FORMAT.

    The Senate document described in section 1 shall include 
illustrations and shall be in the style, form, manner, and printing as 
directed by the Joint Committee on Printing after consultation with the 
Secretary of the Senate.

SEC. 3. COPIES.

    In addition to the usual number of copies, there shall be printed 
600 additional copies of the document specified in section 1 for the 
use of the Secretary of the Senate.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ADAM JOSEPH SHOCKEY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1141

[ February 22, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2016CF006562AMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Anthony Calvello, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, Assista nt Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR

, M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
BUDGET INFORMATION - Construction Programs

NOTE: Certain Federal assistance programs require additional computations to arrive at the Federal share of project costs eligible for participation. If such is the 

COST CLASSIFICATION a. Total Cost b. Costs Not Allowable for 

 Participation 

1. Administrative and legal expenses $ $ 2. Land, structures, rights-of-way, appraisals, etc. $ $ 3. Relocation expenses and payment $ $ 4. Architectural and engineering fees $ $ 5. Other architectural and engineering fees $ $ 6. Project inspection fees $ $ 7. Site work $ $ 8. Demolition and removal $ $ 9. Construction $ $ 10. Equipment $ $ 11. Miscellaneous $ $ 12. SUBTOTAL (sum of lines 1-11) $ $ 13. Contingencies $ $ 14. SUBTOTAL $ $ 15. Project (program) income $ $ 16. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (subtract #15 from 

#14) 

$ $ 

FEDERAL FUNDING 

17. Federal assistance requested, calculate as follows: 

(Consult Federal agency for Federal percentage share.) Enter eligible costs from line 16c Multiply 

X____________% 

Enter the resulting Federal share. 

Previous Edition Usable Standard FoAuthorized for Local Reproduction Prescribed by
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7560]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 18997]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Boundary Establishment for the Presque Isle National Wild and 
Scenic River, Ottawa National Forest; Gogebic County, MI

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 3(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act, the USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, is transmitting the 
final boundary of the Presque Isle National Wild and Scenic River to 
Congress.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information may be obtained by 
contacting Bill Baer, Recreation Program Manager, Ottawa National 
Forest, E6248 US Hwy 2, Ironwood, MI 49938, (906) 932-1330, ext. 342.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Presque Isle Wild and Scenic River 
boundary is available for review at the following offices: USDA Forest 
Service, Office of the Chief, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington 
DC 20024; USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region, Suite 400, 626 East 
Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53202 and; Ottawa National Forest, 
E6248 US Hwy 2, Ironwood, MI 49938. A detailed legal description is 
available upon request.
    The Michigan Scenic River Act of 1992 (Pub. L. 102-249-March 3, 
1992) designated the Presque Isle River, Michigan, as a National Wild 
and Scenic River, to be administered by the Secretary of Agriculture. 
As specified by law, the boundary will not be effective until ninety 
days after Congress receives the transmittal.

     Dated: March 7, 2012.
Anthony V. Scardina,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2012-7560 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6723

WILLIAM H. GALVIN, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. PERRYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER RICHIE HUFFSTUTLER , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Stephanie A. Gallagher , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 01754

- SAG )

Submitted : October 26, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
William H. Galvin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6723 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: William H. Galvin, Jr., appeals the distr ict court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Galvin v. Perryville
Pol ice Dep ’ t , No. 1:21

- cv - 01754

- SAG ( D. Md. May 11, 2022)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6723 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kermit L. ISOM.

No. 87-K-0217.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Isom, Kermit L.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-5798; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 294-302.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 620.

Denied.
#### Frank Schaler et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Herman W. Feder et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 30, 1959.

*Manuel Maxwell*for Herman W. Feder, defendant.

*Frankenthaler S Kohn*for Arthur Gottlieb, defendant.

*Jay A. Gilman*for plaintiffs.

*669Aron Steuer, J.

The suit, in form, is a stockholder’s derivative action. The corporation has not been joined as a party and defendants move to require plaintiffs to join it and to stay proceedings until they do. The corporation is ordinarily a necessary party and the relief asked for is appropriate *(Carruthers*v. *Waite Mining Co.,*306 N. Y. 136). However the corporation was a Florida corporation and it has been dissolved by court order in Florida. It is not necessary to join a defunct corporation (W*einert*v. *Kinkel,*296 N. Y. 151). Defendants argue that the corporation is not defunct because the Florida law provides that a dissolved corporation continues its entity for the purpose of suit for a period of five years.

This question has been raised before. In the *Weinert*case *{supra)*the record was not entirely clear but the court deemed the corporation completely defunct despite a Delaware statute of similar import. In *Cohen*v. *Dana*(287 N. Y. 405) the question was not directly passed upon as the relief granted below was held improper in any event. It is however intimated that where as here the parties before the court comprise the persons who would be the corporate representatives (plaintiffs and defendants here include all the stockholders, the officers and three of the four directors at the time of dissolution) that a court of equity can make adequate provision for the *de facto*representation of the corporation. In view of this the motion is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-4946

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRELL LEON JOHNSON, a/k/a Jay,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District

Judge. (CR-99-39)

Submitted: April 20, 2000 Decided: May 1, 2000

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence J. Lewis, FLESHER & LEWIS, Huntington, West Virginia, for

Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, John C. Parr,

Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerrell Leon Johnson appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to distribute and

possess with intent to distribute crack cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 846

(1994). Johnson claims that the district court erred by taking

into account his sister’s grand jury testimony in determining his

relevant conduct. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and

find that the district court did not clearly err by attributing to

him the 56 grams of cocaine as the result of his sister’s testimony. See United States v. McHan, 101 F.3d 1027, 1034 (4th Cir.

1996). Accordingly, we affirm Johnson’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**Neurogen      Corporation**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. Section 1350)**

|   | 1. | I                am the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of                Neurogen Corporation (the "Company"). |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                the best of my knowledge: |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------|

|   | a. | The                Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December                31, 2005                accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities                and                Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the                "Exchange Act"); and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The                information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:                /s/ Stephen R. Davis     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   | ------------------------                    |
|   |                                        |
|   | Stephen                R. Davis             |
|   | Executive                Vice President and |
|   | Chief                Operating Officer      |
|   | Date:                March 14, 2006         |
**Exhibit
      23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





C2
      Global
      Technologies Inc.


Toronto,
      Ontario, Canada





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on:
      Form
      S-8 Nos. (333-86761, 333-88881, 333-08483, 333-08477, 333-81646) of C2 Global
      Technologies Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2007, relating to the
      consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which
      appears in this Form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
      regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.





Mintz
      & Partners LLP


Toronto,
      Ontario


March
      1,
      2007
#### Lillian KATZ, Appellant, v. BEISWENGER, HOCH & ASSOCIATES, INC., and Capeletti Brothers, Inc., Appellees.

Nos. 87-1864, 87-2217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 12, 1988.

*1220Klein & Tannen, P.A., and Alan D. Sack-rin, for appellant.

Hertzberg & Malinski, P.A., and Deborah Marks, for appellee Beiswenger, Hoch & Associates, Inc.

Peters, Pickle, Niemoeller, Robertson, Lax & Parsons and Donna C. Hurtak, for appellee Capeletti Bros., Inc.

Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final summary judgments granted in favor of Capeletti Brothers, Inc., and Beiswenger, Hoch & Associates, Inc., upon the authority of *Easterday v. Masiel-lo,*518 So.2d 260 (Fla.1988); *Edward M. Ckadboume, Inc. v. Vaughn,*491 So.2d 551 (Fla.1986); and *Slavin v. Kay,*108 So.2d 462 (Fla.1958).

Affirmed.