## State of California

Staff Report



# Town of Mammoth Lakes

PM 10 

# Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request

Release Date: August 18, 2014

Schedule d for Consideration: September 18 , 2014 California Environmental Protection Agency



# AIR RESOURCES BOARDThis document has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board , nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. BACKGROUND

................................ ................................ ................................ ...... 1

II. REDESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS

................................ ................................ .... 2

III. EVALUATION OF THE MAINTENANCE PLAN/REDESI GNATION REQUEST

... 3

A. Attainment of the Standard

................................ ................................ ................ 3

B. Fully Approved SIP

................................ ................................ ............................ 5

C. Attai nment Results from Permanent and Enforceable Emission Reductions

.... 5

D. Maintenance Plan Provides for Continuing Attainment

................................ ..... 6

1. Attainment Year Emission Inventory

................................ ............................ 6

2. Maintenance Demonstration

................................ ................................ ........ 7

3. PM 10 Monitoring Network

................................ ................................ ............. 8

4. Verification of Continued Attainment

................................ ........................... 8

5. Contingency Plan

................................ ................................ ........................ 8

E. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

................................ ................................ ....... 9

IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

................................ ................................ .............. 10I. BACKG R OUND

The Town of Mammoth Lakes ( Mammoth Lakes ) , referred to as the Mammoth Lake s Planning Area in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) rulemaking

, was designated as nonattainment for the 24

- h ou r particulate matter less than 10 microns ( PM 10 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard ( standard ) on November 15, 1990

. The

nonattainment area covers approximately 68 square miles within the Great Basin

Unifie d Air Pollution Control District (District) and encompasses almost all of the incorporated portion of Mammoth Lakes and a portion of unincorporated Mono County

. The unincorporated portion of the nonattainment area includes the Mammoth Yosemite Airport. F igure 1 shows the boundaries of the nonattainment area and the incorporated portion of Mammoth Lakes

.

The District and Mammoth Lakes adopted an Air Quality Management Plan (1990 Plan)

to attain the 24

- hour PM 10 standard in November 1990. The 1990 Plan focused emission control requirements on two area source categories that were determined during earlier air quality monitoring and analysis to be primarily responsible for

exceedances of the standard in the winter : residential wood combustion and road

san ding with volcanic cinders (road cinders)

. The 1990 Plan committed to long

- term

PM 10 monitoring at a location found to be significantly impacted by emissions from both of these area sources. Since 1984, th e site chosen for monitoring has been situated in a commercial area (Gateway Center) near the western edge of town . This site has

h ost ed F ederal R eference M ethod (FRM) monitor s and F ederal E quivalent M ethod (FEM) monitors continuously except for a two year period from 1998 to 2000 when the

roof upon which the station was installed was replaced during building remodel ing

. Currently, the District maintains one FRM filter

- based monitor and one non

- certified

continuous PM 10 monitor at the Gateway Center site.

The 2014 Update to the Air Quality Ma intenance Plan and Redesignation Request for

the Town of Mammoth Lakes (Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request) adopted by

the District Board on May 5, 2014, reports that n o exceedances of the 24

- hour PM 10 standard of 150 μg/m 3 have been recorded at the si te since 1993 . Analysis of air quality

data accessed through U.S. EPA’s Air Quality System shows that the number of exceedances per year during the 2010

- 2012 averaging period to be less than 1.0. Although two exceedances of the standard were recorded in 2013, these occurred during the height of the Aspen Fire near Fresno that pushed smoke into the Mammoth Lakes area. Regardless, these two exceedances did not cause Mammoth Lakes to

violate the PM 10 standard under U.S. EPA regulations. These regulations t rigger a

violation of the PM 10 standard when four or more exceedances are recorded in a three calendar year period.

1Figure 1. Map of the Mammoth Lake s Planning Area PM 10 Nonattainment Area

II. REDESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS

The federal Clean Air Act (Act) authorizes the U.S. EPA to redesignate an area from

nonattainment to attainment if a number of requirements are satisfied

. T hese requirements

, as listed in Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Act , are:

1. The area has attained the standard ;
2. The applicable implementation plan for the area is fully approved under S ection 110(k) of the Act ; 3. T he improvements in air quality are due to permanent and enforceable emission

reductions resulting from implementation of the applicable implementa tion plan ;
4. The area has a fully approved maintenance plan satisfying the requirements of

S ection 175A of the Act ; and

5. The state in which the area is located has met all applicable requirements under

Section 110 and Part D of the Act.

U.S. EPA guidance fu rther explain s the redesignation requirements including the required elements of approvable maintenance plans 1 . Each PM 10 m aintena nce p lan

1 Calcagni , John, Memorandum, Procedures for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, September 4, 1992. http://www. epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t5/memoranda/redesignmem090492.pdf

2must provide for continued maintenance of the PM 10 standard for t wenty years after redesignation and include the following components :

1. Attainment emission inventory;

2. Maintenance demonstration ; 3. Commitment to continue d operation of the monitoring network;

4. Commitment to verification of continued attainment; and

5. Contingency plan to promptly correct any violation of the PM 10 standard that

occurs after the area has been redesignated.

III. EVALUATION OF THE MAINTENANCE PLAN/REDESIGNATION REQUEST

Based on review of the District Maintenance Plan / Redesignation Request and

su pporting technical analysis

, ARB staff concurs that the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request meets the Act’s requirements

. The following sections summarize ARB staff findings and conclusions with respect to the required elements of

the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request

.

A. Attainment of the Stand ard

As shown in Table 1

, PM 10 air quality improved significantly over the first few years of implementation of the 1990 Plan in Mammoth Lakes

. PM 10 is measured at a single monitoring station at the Gateway Center

. The Gateway Center site lies downslope

from most residential areas and adjacent to the intersection of Main Street and County

Road 203. A ir within the ground

- level mixing layer on cold, still winter nights in

mountainous terrain tends to cool through ground contact more than air aloft, resulti ng
in downhill flows that behave somewhat like water in surface runoff flows but with flow depths measured in tens of meters. These air “surface runoff flows” entrain wood

smoke and , in the absence of vertical mixing, transport the smoke and its PM 10 load downhill to pool in areas of level terrain . The Gateway Center monitoring site lies at the

toe of Mammoth Mountain and the edge of the Long Valley Caldera, a flat, wide bowl to

the east of Mammoth Lakes. PM 10 concentrations from vehicle

- entrained road cinders

are typically highest adjacent to heav ily

- tra veled arterial streets . Both of these phenomena mak e the Gateway Center site a good candidate for sampling the highest

PM 10 impacts from residential wood combustion and road sanding in the community.

T able 1 lists PM 10 monitoring data using several metrics for tracking PM 10 air quality year by year. These metrics include the highest 24

- hour average PM 10 concentration recorded during each year , the estimated number of exceedance days per year for the

24

- hour PM 10 standard, and the 3

- year average of estimated numbers of exceedance day s per year for use in determining attainment of the 24

- hour PM 10 standard. The 24

- hour PM 10 standard is met when the estimated number of exceedance days recorded

over a three

- year period average one or less per year.

3Table 1. Peak 24

- Hour Average PM 10 Per Year and Estimated PM 10 Exceedance Days Per Year and Per Three

- Year Average

Year Peak 24

- Hour PM 10 Concentration (μg/m 3 ) Estimated Exceedances Days

Per Year 3

- Year Average of

Estimated Exceedance Days

Per Year

1988 166 6.2

1989 163 7.1

1990 161 12.0 8.4

1991 134 0 6.4

1992 138 0 4.0

1993 178 6.4 2.1

1994 92 0 2.1

1995 122 0 2.1

1996 74 0 0

1997 112 0 0

1998 1 106 * *

1999 1

- 2 * *

2000 1 70 * *

2001 134 * *

2002 1 129 * *

2003 1 74 * *

2004 86 0 *

2005 85 0 *

2006 78 0 0

2007 67 0 0

2008 138 * *

2009 116 0 *

2010 100 0 *

2011 101 0 0

2012 56 * *

(1) Monitoring data for these years do not meet U.S. EPA completeness standards (2) Monitoring discontinued during building remodeling.

PM 10 monitoring has been conducted at the Gateway Center site for more than the

duration needed to determine air quality status as specified by U.S. EPA regulation defining the PM 10 standard

. PM 10 monitoring began at this location on April 17, 1988,

with 1

- in

- 6 day filter sampling. Monitoring was suspended between August 23, 1998, and Septem ber 10, 2000, while the roof up on which the station is mounted was replaced during building remodeling. The frequency of PM 10 filter monitoring was

increased from a 1

- in

- 6 day schedule to a 1

- in

- 3 day schedule in 2001, and continuous monitoring commenced in 2008 at this site.

4The last three year period during which the 24

- hour PM 10 standard was violated was

1993

- 1995 at Mammoth Lakes. As Table 1 indicates, peak 24

- hour PM 10 concentrations have remained below the 150 μg/m 3 standard since monitoring

recomm enced in 2000 and b elow 100 μg/m3 for more than 50 percent of the years with adequate datasets in the past decade

. U.S. EPA regulation defines a violation of the

24.hour PM 10 standard as 4 or more exceedances recorded in a three year period.

B. Fully Approved SIP

The 1990 Plan is a fully approved portion of the California SIP. The 1990 Plan was submitted to U.S. EPA on September 11, 1991, and subsequent amendments

, primarily

of an administrative nature

, were forwarded to U.S. EPA on January 9, 1992. In a

Direct Final Rule Notice published in the June 24, 1996

, Federal Register, U.S. EPA fully approved the 1990 Plan as amended. 2

C. Attainment Results from Permanent and Enforceable Emission Reductions

The substantial decline in peak winter day PM 10 concentration shown in Table 1

between 1991 and 1995 is due to the implementation of control measures contained in the 1990 Air Quality Management Plan

. Studies conducted prior to development and adoption of the 1 990 Plan estimated that up to 93 percent o f ambient PM 10 on some exceedance days was generated by fireplaces and woodstoves, and that up to 44
percent on other exceedance days was produced by the entrainment of pulverized road sanding agents ( road cinders) after roads became free of ice

.

Mammoth Lakes ordinances adopted to implement the 1990 Plan reduced residential

wood

- burning emissions by requiring permanent replacement of non

- U.S. EPA

- certified woodstoves with certified units upon property resale, requiring the removal of some

wood

- burning devices by limiting the number of devices per residence to one, and by instituting no burn days when calm or stagnant meteorological conditions were

forecasted in winter months.

Data collected and analyzed by the District and Mammoth Lakes between 1990 an d

1994 demonstrated measureable reductions in the PM 10 wood smoke emission inventory for the nonattainment area. Over this time span, the total number of wood

burning devices declined from 5,946 to 5,749, and the fraction of these that were

U.S. EPA

- cert if i ed rose from 1 percent to 35 percent

. 3 In December 2006, Mammoth

Lakes amended these ordinances to eliminate the operational exemption from no burn day requirements originally granted to U.S. EPA

- certified devices. Starting in 2007, all

wood

- burning d evices in the nonattainment area are required to be shut down on no

2 Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 122, June 24, 1996, pp. 32341

- 32345

3 Taylor, Bill, Town of Mammoth Lakes, Letter to Duane Ono, Great Basin Unified APCD, March 2, 1995

5burn days. Emission inventories compiled by the District report that PM 10 emissions

from residential wood

- burning declined by 54 percent between 1990 and 2012

.

Also due to the 1990 Plan, PM 10 e missions from the re

- en trainment of road cinders

were controlled in Mammoth Lakes ordinances adopted in 1990 by requiring the use of high

- efficiency vacuum street sweepers for cinder removal and the enforcement of a

traffic volume limit within the boundaries of the incorporated area through VMT

reduction permit conditions on new development.

Prior to 1989, Mammoth Lakes did not remove road cinders from public streets and

roads (as indicated by the 1990 Plan emission invent ory calculations), but instead allowed cinders to be pulverized and removed by entrainment and transport of road surfaces by passing vehicles. Applicable emission control guidelines published prior to 1990 estimated the control efficiency of vacuum street sweepers to be 34 percent

, which

– at the time

– was believed to the most effective control technology for reducing

PM 10 emissions from public streets with high loadings of sand and silt. 4 This control efficiency was used in the attainment demonstration of the 1990 plan, based on

Mammoth Lakes’ commitments to purchase and use these sweepers in a program of early road cinder removal as sanded roads became free of ice. After the high efficiency vacuum street sweepers were purchased, a test of the effective ness of the vacuum

street sweeper program in the winter of 1993

- 1994 revealed that road cinder emissions were reduced by 68 percent , resulting in greater control of emissions and lower residual impacts on air quality than had been estimated in the 1990 Plan. 5

D. Maintenance Plan Provides for Continuing Attainment

S ection 175 A of the Act establishes the required elements of a maintenance plan for areas seeking redesignation from nonattainment to attainment. Using an attainment year inventory and future in ventory projections, p lans must demonstrate continued attainment through the first 10

- year maintenance period. Comprehensive inventories were developed in this Plan for the representative attainment year (201 2 ) and for the projected full build

- out year (2 030) when peak winter day PM 10 emissions will reach a

maximum level.

1. Attainment Year Emission Inventory

As the standard being addressed in the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request is

the 24

- hour PM 10 standard, and as all historical exceedances of this standard occurred during winter months, the emission inventories contained in th is P lan all report peak winter day PM 10 emissions

. PM 10 monitoring data from Mammoth Lakes demonstrates

4 Control of Open Fugitive Dust So urces; prepared by Chatten Cowherd et. al. for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. EPA

- 450/3

- 88

- 008; September 1988

5 Street Sweeper Efficiency Study for the Town of Mammoth Lakes; prepared by Charles Satterfield, Satterfield & Associates, for the T own of Mammoth Lakes; June 13, 1994

6that the last viol ation of the standard occurred in 1993, and that peak winter day

concentrations each year have not varied substantially between 2005 and 201 2 . As a result, the starting point for inventory tracking in the plan is 2012, the most recent year of complete dat a at the time that drafting of the plan commenced.

A series of analyses determining the speciation of peak winter day PM 10 also

demonstrate d that two sources

– residential wood combustion and road sanding

– account ed for more than 9 5 percent of ambient PM 10 on these days in 1990, and more

than 90 percent in 2012

. Th ese finding s are supported by the dominance of PM 10 emissions from these two sources in the emission inventor ies . Although PM 10 emissions from residential wood combustion and road sanding have each decreased by approximately 33 percent since 1990

- according to the emission inventory

- the magnitudes of emissions from these sources continue to overwhelm all other sources in 2012. The result of this dominance is that emission inventory analysis reported in the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request continues to focus on these two sources . A tabulation of peak winter day PM 10 emissions by source category and milestone year that quantifies the dominance discussed above is shown in Table 2

.

.

Table 2

. Peak 24

- hour PM 10 Emissions (kg/ winter day)

Source Category 2012 2030

Residential Wood Combustion 850 802

Road Dust and Vehicle Emissions 3,466 4, 319

Industrial Sources 8 8

TOTAL 4,324 5,129
Note: ARB customarily reports emission inventory in pounds or tons per day or year. The Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request reported this inventory in kilograms per day.

2. Maintenance Demonstration

In order to demonstrate maintenance of the PM 10 24

- h ou r standard through the year 2024, the District compiled a n emission inventory for an attainment year (201 2 ) and formulated projections for the build

- out year (2030) of the Mammoth Lakes 2007

General Plan

. The attainment year and projected inventories represent winter

emissions which reflect the nature of the PM 10 problem in the area. The Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request states that residential wood combustion and resuspended road dust comprise almo st all of the PM 10 emissions during winter days. This statement is supported by chemical mass balance (CMB) analyses that were conducted in 1990

and 2012.

The District used the recent CMB analyses in conjunction with recent high winter days

to determi ne if the PM 10 standard would be maintained through the 10

- year maintenance period. Despite the increases in road dust and vehicle emissions forecast, the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request demonstrates that the PM 10 standard will

7be maintained throug h 2030. The 2030 timeframe provides ample time for the

U.S. EPA approval process and still allows for a 10

- year maintenance period.

3. PM 10 Monitoring Network

The existing PM 10 monitoring network in Mammoth Lakes consists of the single station

located at the Gateway Center commercial cluster. The D istrict commits in the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request to continue daily PM 10 monitoring for the twenty year term required of an approvable maintenance plan. Daily PM 10 monitoring using a continuous method is also a critical element in the Mammoth Lakes ’ residential wood combustion tracking and control program.

4. Verification of Continued Attainment

The District commits in the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request to verify

continued attainment t hrough the compilation and submittal of progress reports to U.S. U.S. EPA every third year starting in 2017. The progress reports will contain emission inventory updates, air quality trend assessments, modeling performance re

- evaluations,

and additional i nformation that may be relevant to the air quality program of Mammoth

Lakes. Eight years after designation to attainment, the District also commits to revisiting

the SIP to address the second 10

- year maintenance cycle.

5. Contingency Plan

The Act requir es a maintenance plan to include contingency provisions for prompt correction of any PM 10 standard violation that might occur after the area has be en redesignated to attainment. If a violation of the standard occurs, the District will determine whether the violation was due to an exceptional event or a controllable source. If the violation was due to a controllable source, within 18 months, the District

and Mammoth Lakes will ado pt additional control measures related to residential wood

smoke or volcanic cinders. The District believes that the need to exercise contingency measures is small given the ample attainment margin demonstrated by the ambient air quality monitoring data c ollected since 2003 showing peak winter 24

- hour PM 10 concentrations generally hovering between 90 and 110 μ g/ m 3

.

In addition, while not needed to show maintenance, the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request incorporates several amendments to District Rule 431 (Particulate Emissions) that increase the stringency of the Mammoth Lakes residential wood combustion requirements that will further reduce emissions by eliminating exemptions for burning on no burn days, prohibit wood

- burning devices in new

commercia l buildings, and allow only pellet stoves in new multi

- family structures. These amendments will cause the currently flat

- lined peak winter day PM 10 concentrations to

8begin dropping, potentially resulting in larger compliance margins and further reducing

t he potential for use of contingency measures.

E. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets

The Act requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects receiving federal funding or requiring federal approval must be found to be fully consistent with the applica ble SIP. The federal Transportation Conformity Rule requires SIPs to specify on

road motor vehicle emission budgets (transportation conformity budgets) that are

consistent with the attainment and maintenance demonstrations in the SIP. 6 The conformity regulation requires departments of transportation to demonstrate that emissions from applicable portions of regional transportation plans and programs do not exceed these emissions budgets.

The transportation conformity budgets in PM 10 SIP s must include emissions from several categories of sources that are integral components of on

- road infrastructure construction, maintenance, and use. These source categories are identified in the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request as vehicle exhaust, vehicle wear (e.g., abrasive generation of particles from brake linings, tire surfaces, etc.), re

- entrained road dust, and re

- entrained traction agents (road cinders). Under U.S. EPA regulation, road construction fugitive dust may be excluded from confor mity budgets if the applicable SIP does not identify this source as being significant. 7 PM 10 emissions from source categories included in the budgets must be reported in the unit s of measure upon which

the SIP emission inventor ies are based. For the Main tenance Plan/Redesignation Request, th is unit is k ilo g rams (kg) per peak winter day.

Table 3 shows the District

- adopted transportation conformity budgets for PM 10 peak winter day emissions for the Mammoth Lakes Planning Area . If U.S. EPA determines

these budgets to be adequate, future transportation plan amendments and updates in Mammoth Lakes will need to conform to these budgets. Mammoth Lakes must ensure that the aggregate peak winter day transportation PM 10 emissions in the Planning Area

do not exceed these levels when approving new transportation plans and transportation programs, even if the mix of projects changes or growth increases. These budgets will remain in effect until other budgets are found adequate through approval by U.S. EPA.

During the 30

- day public comment period prior to District Board adoption of the
Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request, District staff modified the motor vehicle
emission budgets to respond to comments from U.S. EPA. As a result, the version of

Maintenance Plan/Red esignation Request considered and adopted by the District Board
was not the version released to the general public at the commencement of the public
comment period. To fully comply with the req uirements for public hearings on SIP

revisions in U.S. EPA regulations 8 , ARB is providing a full 30

- day comment period and

6 The Transportation Conformity Regulation is found at 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93.

7 40 CFR 93.122(e)(1)

8 40 CFR 50.102(a) (Public Hearings)

9public hearing on the District

- adopted version of the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation
Request.

Table 3

. Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for Maintenance of the 24

- hour PM10

NAAQS

Motor Vehicle Emissions (kg/peak winter day) Year

2012 2030 Road Dust & Vehicle Emissions (Incorporated Portion) 2,531 3,154 Road Dust & Vehicle Emissions (Unincorporated Portion) 935 1,165

Total 3,466 4,319

I V. STAFF RECOMMENDATION

ARB st aff has reviewed the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request for Mammoth

Lakes and consulted with District staff during this review. ARB s taff finds that the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request meet s all applicable Act requirements

. The monitoring data shows that the area attained the 24

- hour PM 10 standard in 1994 , and

the maintenance demonstration shows that the standard will be maintained for ten

years.

Therefore, staff recommend s that the Board adopt the 2014 Update to the Air Quality

Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Request for the Town of Mammoth Lakes as a revision to the Calif ornia SIP for submittal to U.S. EPA

.

10