alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Potential Emission Reduction Estimates Natural Gas Usage Approach

OTC States

Natural Gas Fuel 

Consumption1 

(Million Cubic 

Feet)

State to 

SJVAPCD 

Fuel Ratio

2017 Total Emission 

Reduction 

Estimates 

(tons per year)3,4,5

2020 Total 

Emission 

Reduction 

Estimates 

(tons per year)3,4,5

2029 Total 

Emission 

Reduction 

Estimates 

(tons per year)3,4

2007 Area Source 

Commercial 

Natural Gas Fuel 

Nox Emissions

(tons per year)

Connecticut 199,440 0.80 183.3 305.6 916.73 1,569

Delaware 54,825 0.22 50.4 84.0 252.00 324

D.C. 33,302 0.13 30.6 51.0 153.07 682

Maine 77,574 0.31 71.3 118.9 356.57 0

Maryland 208,226 0.83 191.4 319.0 957.11 2,347

Massachusetts 430,284 1.72 395.6 659.3 1977.81 2,140

New Hampshire 60,386 0.24 55.5 92.5 277.56 437

New Jersey 653,459 2.61 600.7 1,001.2 3003.63 7,709

New York 1,198,023 4.79 1,101.3 1,835.6 5506.73 2,917

Pennsylvania 859,939 3.44 790.5 1,317.6 3952.72 6,070

Rhode Island 94,122 0.38 86.5 144.2 432.63 444

Vermont 8,443 0.03 7.8 12.9 38.81 119

Virginia 2 110,720 0.44 101.8 169.6 508.93 1,023

OTR Total 3,988,743 3,666.9 6,111.4 18334.30 25,780

Notes

1. Assumes 2014 effective date of rule.

2. Natural Gas Consumption by End Use, http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_cons_sum_a_EPG0_VC0_mmcf_a.htm

3. SJ Natural Gas Fuel Usage = 11% of CA statewide fuel usage (2,273,958 mmcf) based upon population (see 'Population Data' tab)

4. 2005 SJVUAPCD 4308 Rule, Final Staff Report: Estimated NOx reductions = 2.0 Average annual tpd (see Appendix B)

5. 2008 SJVUAPCD 4307 Rule Proposal: Estimated NOx reductions = 1.15 Average annual tpd (see Appendix B)

Total NOx tpd 

= 3.2 Average annual tpd

To convert to 

tpy: (Total NOx Reductions (tpd)*(365 days/yr))*(State to SJVUAPCD Population Ratio)

6. Assumption: 15 year equipment life based upon the rule effective in 2014 (approximately half of the total rule reductions would be achieved by 2021)
2007 Area Source 

Residential 

Natural Gas Fuel 

Nox Emissions

(tons per year)

2007 Area Source 

Commercial and 

Residential Natural 

Gas Nox Emissions 

(tpy)

% Reduction of 

Commercial and 

residential Natural Gas 

in 2017

% Reduction of 

Commercial and 

Residential Natural 

Gas in 2020

2,068 3,637 5.0% 8.4%

508 832 6.1% 10.1%

628 1,310 2.3% 3.9%

49 49 0.0% 0.0%

3,573 5,920 3.2% 5.4%

5,369 7,509 5.3% 8.8%

348 785 7.1% 11.8%

9,259 16,968 3.5% 5.9%

18,659 21,576 5.1% 8.5%

10,869 16,939 4.7% 7.8%

793 1,237 7.0% 11.7%

135 254 3.1% 5.1%

1,094 2,117 4.8% 8.0%

53,351 79,132 4.6% 7.7%
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1Or, put succintly, the Court affirms the district court’s

June 19, 1997, written epistle.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10726

Summary Calendar

BRIAN BLAINE REYNOLDS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN ACADEMY ACHIEVEMENT, INC., et al.,

Defendant-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:96-CV-2751-R)

March 13, 1998

Before JOHNSON, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Brian Blaine Reynolds challenges the district court’s order

dismissing his lawsuit for failure to state a claim.

As a preliminary matter, this Court finds that it has

jurisdiction to consider the present appeal.1 The Court is

required to address questions of subject matter jurisdiction sua

sponte. Giannakos v. M/V BRAVO TRADER, 762 F.2d 1295, 1297 (5th
2

Cir. 1985). After a careful review of the record and the

controlling authorities, the Court concludes that there is no

jurisdictional bar to consideration of this appeal. See Thomas v.

LTV Corp., 39 F.3d 611, 615 (5th Cir. 1994).

Reynold’s one paragraph challenge of the district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim fails to present an issue

for appeal. This court will not raise and discuss legal issues

that a litigant fails to assert, for claims not pressed on appeal

are deemed abandoned. Brinkman v. Dallas County Sheriff, 813 F.2d

744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). This Court applies less stringent

standards to pro se appeals, but even so, pro se litigants must

reasonably comply with the standards of Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 28. Grant v. Cuellar, 59 F.3d 523, 524 (5th Cir. 1995);

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Reynolds did

not point out specific error in the district court’s legal analysis

nor cite any authority in support of his general proposition that

the district court erred in dismissing his claim. His brief is

devoid of logical argumentation or citation to authority.

Accordingly, he has abandoned the only issue on appeal. See Yohey,

985 F.2d at 224-25. 

Because Reynold’s appeal is without arguable merit, it is

frivilous. For that reason, it is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The Court cautions Reynolds that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Reynolds is further cautioned to
3

review any pending appeals to make sure that they do not raise

frivilous arguments.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
**Exhibit 23.1**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3(File No. 333-101607 and No. 333-115329) and on Form S-8 (File No. 33-42354, No. 33-63510, No.33-79654, No. 33-79756, No. 33-79664, No. 333-48357, No. 333-68815, No. 333-81821 and No.333-94405) of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 18, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and our report datedFebruary 18, 2005 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Browning-Ferris Industries,Inc., which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31184 Conference Calendar

__________________ JOSE F. PUPO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus ALLEN CARTER; DORA RABALAIS; BURL CAIN, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD L. STALDER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-454
- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * This is an appeal from the district court's dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) of appellant's civil rights complaint. He contends that the district court erred by dismissing his complaint as frivolous and by doing so when the proceedings had been stayed previously by the magistrate judge. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and find no reversible error. See Pupo v. Carter, et al. , No. 95-CV454 (M.D. La. Oct. 18, 1995); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).No. 95-31184 -2- AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Main Street Restaurant
      Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 26, 2005, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Michael Garnreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael
              GarnreiterMichael
                GarnreiterChief
                Financial Officer




Date:
      April 24, 2006
Variable Question(s)

Age 1 Gender 2 Race 5a, 5b Criminal history 23, 24 Physical/mental disability 25 Education level/degrees 7, 8, 9 Prior employment history and income 10, 11, 12 Financial support 22 Caregiver status 3a, 3b Military status 4 Area of residence 6 Similar services 29Outcome Questions

Members increase desire/expectations for postsecondary education 18© Members gain knowledge about postsecondary education 15(j,k,l,m,n,o)
Members gain knowledge of job search skills15(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i)
Members increase positive attitudes about obtaining and maintaining employment 28(a,b,d) Members gain knowledge of community
resources 15(p,q,r) Members increase positive attitudes / sense of community 16, 17 Members increase self-efficacy 13, 14
Members complete job search components19(a,b,c,d,e) , 20
Members gain job experience 10, 11, 12 Members complete coursework and/or take GED test 8, 9, 19(f,g) Members or alumni increase in GED certificates / H.S. diplomas 7 Members or alumni increase access to community products (e.g. housing applications, TANF) 21, 22 Members or alumni obtain a job / internship / apprenticeship 10 Members increase civic engagement (registered to vote, engaged in the community) 26,27, 28
Members or alumni increase in completed college/trade school applications 19(h,i)
Members or alumni decrease recidivism / interaction with the criminal justice system23, 24 Members or alumni increase in college enrollment 7, 8, 9, 19(j)
Members or alumni maintain employment 10Timeline

During the program
During the program
During the program

During the program
During the program
During the program During the program Up to 3 months after the program Up to 12 months after the program Up to 12 months after the program During the program through 6 or more months afterward
During the program through 6 or more months afterward By 3 to 6 months after the program By 3 to 6 months after the program During the program or up to 12 or more months after the program During the program or up to 12 or more months after the program 3 to 12 or more months after the program 6 to 12 or more months after the program
Exhibit 99 (p)

                                                     March 27, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

Re:  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 for CRIIMI
     MAE Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Consistent with the Commission's release of March 18, 2002, please be advised
that the Company has obtained a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP, the Company's
independent public accountants, dated March 27, 2002, containing the following
representations regarding the audits performed on the Company's balance sheets
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related statements of income, changes
in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999:

o    the audits were subject to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the
     U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that
     the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards;
o    there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on
     the audits; and
o    there was appropriate availability of national office
     consultation.

Representation relating to the availability of personnel at foreign affiliates
of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to these audits.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   /s/H. William Willoughby
                                   -------------------------
                                   H. William Willoughby
                                   President
#### Rickie T. MEREDITH v. Pamela S. MEREDITH.

No. 58508.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 22, 1989.

Rehearing Denied May 3, 1989.

Ralph E. Chapman, Chapman *&*Heaton, Clarksdale, for appellant.

Grady F. Tollison, Nina S. Tollison, Patterson, Tollison & Alexander, Oxford, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Coahoma County; Harvey T. Ross, Chancellor.

Before HAWKINS, C.J., and ROBERTSON and PITTMAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.4








Loan Contract


Party A (borrower): Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.(hereinafter Party A)





Party B (lender): Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Party B)





As Party A gets some difficulties in floating capital, Party A and Party B reached the following agreement on the loan and conclude the following contact under the principle of equality, voluntary and consensus.


(1) Party B will lend RMB (capital) RMB FORTY-FIVE MILLION ONLY to Party A and will hand over to Party A before 20 October 2009.


(2) This loan shall be used as the floating capital for production and operation of Party B.


(3) This loan is provided to ensure that Party A can provide goods to Party B  on time and guarantee the quality and quantity. No interest shall be charged in the period of loan stipulated in the contract.


(4) Loan term: one year.   Payment due date: before 31 October 2010.


(5) Liability of breach of contract: If Party A fails to repay the loan at the stipulated time, Party B shall charge 0.5% interest based on the remaining balance.


(6) Settlement of disputes: Any dispute shall be settled through friendly negotiation. In case no settlement is reached, this dispute shall be settled in the people’s court where Party B is located.


The contract shall become effective as of the date when it is signed by the Parties. This contract is made in two copies. Each Party keeps one. The contract text has the equal legal effect.


Party A (seal):
Party B (seal):Chief (signature):
Chief (signature):







Seal of Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.





Seal of Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd.





Date of signing the contract: 2 October 2009
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40624

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JASON RAYMOND TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2013 Unpublished Opinion No. 652

Filed: September 3, 2013

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Gooding County. Hon. John K. Butler, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for lewd conduct with a minor child under 

sixteen, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Jason Raymond Torres pled guilty to lewd conduct with a minor child under sixteen. 

Idaho Code § 18-1508. The district court sentenced Torres to a unified term of twenty years, 

with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Torres appeals asserting that the district 

court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Torres’ judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. David M. ANDERSON, Respondent.

No. 71941.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 1988.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John T. Berry, Staff Counsel and James N. Watson, Jr., Bar Counsel, Tallahassee, for complainant.

John A. Weiss, Tallahassee, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This proceeding is before the Court upon the petition of David M. Anderson for leave to resign from membership in The Florida Bar. Disciplinary proceedings are pending against the petitioning attorney. Therefore, his request to resign is governed by Rule of Discipline 3-7.11 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

The respondent attorney is a suspended member of The Florida Bar. He was suspended on May 7, 1987, as a result of findings of professional misconduct on his part. *The Florida Bar v. Anderson,*506 So.2d 403 (Fla.1987). On January 20, 1988, The Florida Bar filed a petition (Case No. 71,769), for an order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court for holding himself out as an attorney and continuing to engage in the practice of law. The accused attorney filed a response attempting to refute the allegations and to explain and justify his conduct. The contempt proceeding and other disciplinary proceedings brought against the respondent were pending at the time he filed the instant petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar.

The petition for leave to resign sets forth the past and present disciplinary proceedings against respondent and states that the resignation for which leave is sought will be permanent. The Florida Bar does not oppose the petition and asks that we allow resignation without leave to apply for readmission, subject to the condition that respondent be required to pay the costs incurred in the several pending disciplinary proceedings.

We grant the petition for leave to resign permanently. As provided by rule 3-7.-11(d), the acceptance of the respondent’s resignation serves to dismiss all pending disciplinary cases. The resignation of David M. Anderson from The Florida Bar shall take effect immediately.

*1143The costs incurred in the pending disciplinary proceedings are assessed against the respondent. Judgment for costs in the amount of $5,983.80 is entered against David M. Anderson, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC WORKSHOP 

DRAFT 2015 PLAN FOR THE 1997 PM2.5 STANDARD

The District will hold a public workshop to present, discuss, and receive 

comments on the draft 2015 PM2.5 Plan, and proposed commitments by the 

District to fulfill federal Clean Air Act mandates at 3:00 PM on Wednesday, March 

4, 2015. The 2015 PM2.5 Plan will demonstrate attainment of the 1997 federal 

PM2.5 standard and satisfy Best Available Control Measure and Most Stringent 

Measure requirements. The proposed commitments will include short term and 

long term commitments for local funding necessary to fully implement the 

required incentive-based measures needed for attainment. 

This workshop may be attended in person at the District’s Fresno office located 

at 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave, Fresno, CA 93726, via video teleconference at the 

District’s Modesto office (4800 Enterprise Way, Modesto, CA 95356) or 

Bakersfield Office (34946 Flyover Court, Bakersfield, CA 93308), or via webcast 

at http://www.valleyair.org/workshops/public_workshops_idx.htm. Documents for 

this workshop will be available at 

www.valleyair.org/workshops/public_workshops_idx.htm. If you are unable to 

view the documents on-line, a paper copy can be obtained by calling Ms. Noemi 

Calderon at (559) 230-6000 or by faxing your request to (559) 230-6064. To 

request Spanish interpreting services, please contact Maricela Velasquez at 

(559) 230-6000 at least 7 days prior to the meeting date. Para solicitar servicios 

de interpretación en Español, por favor póngase en contacto con Maricela 

Velasquez al (559) 230-6000 por lo menos 7 días antes de le fecha de la 

reunión.

Written comments should be addressed to Chelsea Gonzales at SJVUAPCD, 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue, Fresno, CA 93726 or via email at 

airqualityplans@valleyair.org. Comments will be accepted up to and including 

the date of the public hearing for adoption of the plan on April 16, 2015. 

However, comments received after 5:00 PM on March 13, 2015 will be 

addressed at the public hearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         36,732
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  200,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,441
<INVENTORY>                                    8,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               270,924
<PP&E>                                         1,444,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,476,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,234
<BONDS>                                        1,567,490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       1,162
<OTHER-SE>                                     403,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,476,243
<SALES>                                        628,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               628,960
<CGS>                                          372,158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  372,158
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               156,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             55,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                46,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                   15,706
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            30,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                52,412
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.21)
        


</TABLE>