alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 137 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 137

Honoring the 129 sailors and civilians lost aboard the U.S.S. Thresher 
  on April 10, 1963, and urging the Secretary of the Army to erect a 
        memorial to this tragedy in Arlington National Cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2001

    Mr. Sununu (for himself, Mr. Bass, Mr. Baldacci, and Mr. Allen) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
 the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on 
 Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the 129 sailors and civilians lost aboard the U.S.S. Thresher 
  on April 10, 1963, and urging the Secretary of the Army to erect a 
        memorial to this tragedy in Arlington National Cemetery.

Whereas the U.S.S. Thresher was first launched at Portsmouth Naval Shipyard on 
        July 9, 1960;
Whereas the U.S.S. Thresher departed Portsmouth Naval Shipyard for her final 
        voyage on April 9, 1963, with a crew of 16 officers, 96 sailors, and 17 
        civilians;
Whereas the mix of that crew reflects the unity of military and civilian 
        personnel in the naval submarine service, and in the protection of the 
        Nation;
Whereas at approximately 7:47 a.m. on April 10, 1963, while in communication 
        with the surface ship U.S.S. Skylark, and approximately 300 miles off 
        the coast of New England, the U.S.S. Thresher began her final descent;
Whereas the U.S.S. Thresher was declared lost with all hands on April 10, 1963; 
        and
Whereas the crew of the U.S.S. Thresher demonstrated the ``last full measure of 
        devotion'' in service to this Nation, and this devotion characterizes 
        the sacrifices of all submariners, past and present: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) remembers with profound sorrow the loss of the U.S.S. 
        Thresher and her gallant crew of sailors and civilians on April 
        10, 1963; and
            (2) urges the Secretary of the Army to erect a memorial in 
        Arlington National Cemetery to the crew of the U.S.S. Thresher, 
        and to all United States submariners who have lost their lives 
        in the line of duty.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                          ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT FOR RATIOS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                      Year Ended December 31,
                                                ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   1992         1993         1994          1995          1996
                                                -------      --------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                             <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Fixed Charges:
   Interest expensed .........................  $ 2,838      $  5,470      $ 10,925      $  9,247      $  8,468
   Interest capitalized ......................      424         1,058         3,517        11,088        12,970
                                                -------      --------      --------      --------      --------

       Total interest expense ................    3,262         6,528        14,442        20,335        21,438
   Interest component of rent expense ........      242           338           388           915
                                                                                                          2,137
   Amortization/write-off of debt
    issuance costs ...........................       85           540           869           359           877
                                                -------      --------      --------      --------      --------
       Total fixed charges ...................  $ 3,589      $  7,406      $ 15,699      $ 21,609      $ 24,452
                                                =======      ========      ========      ========      ========

Earnings:
   Income (loss) from continuing operations
        before income taxes ..................  $ 2,183      $  4,015      $ (4,532)     $ 21,255      $(66,414)
   Plus fixed charges ........................    3,589         7,406        15,699        21,609        24,452

   Less interest capitalized .................     (424)       (1,058)       (3,517)      (11,088)      (12,970)
                                                -------      --------      --------      --------      --------

       Total earnings ........................  $ 5,348      $ 10,363      $  7,650      $ 31,776      $(54,932)
                                                =======      ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ...........     1.5x          1.4x             *          1.5x            **
                                                =======      ========      ========      ========      ========
</TABLE>

-------------------------

*      Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $8,049.

**     Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $79,384.
From: Lochmann, Robert E- Anchorage, AK Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 6:31 PM To: Simpson, Mary Ann - Washington, DC ·· .. -.;··1 f

..;\.f.

Subject: RE: Anything new with the Akutan Negotiations? MaryAnn Afterthe postal service read Grants bid and their nc;1rrative that expressed similar concerns noted in Karen's message below, I metwith GrantAviations president Bruce Mc(!lasson to discuss those issues. I indicated to Bruce that we would not penalize Grant for not being able to flytheir posted schedule when weather and sea conditionsprevented them from operating and transporting mails. Iexplained to Bruce thatwe have notfined PenAir nor have we penalized them for not operatingtheir posted schedule because we know howdifficultthe conditions are in that area ofAlaska. Rather, we work with the air carrier and have developed asound approach that does not place any undue pressure on the air transportation supplier. We also noted their concern aboutthe hovercraft reliability and we indicated to GrantAviation that we would consider allowing Grantto acquire a mail storage facility on Akun Island to increase their reliability to Akun Island despite the hovercraft not being able to run due to sea conditions. They appreciated hearingthat. So the postal service has addressed all ofGrants postal concerns aired in their initial EAS Bid narrative. I knowthis because Ispecifically asked Bruce in the meeting and his response was that he feltthat our responses were reasonable and positioned Grant to move forward with pursuing the EAS service. Bob Lochmann ManagerTransportation and Networks Alaska District From: Simpson, Mary Ann- Washington, DC Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 12:36 PM 1
Exhibit 31.2



Certifications



I, James A. Cardwell, Jr., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Petro, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: August 13, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ James A. Cardwell, Jr.           
|James A. Cardwell, Jr.               
|Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
January 16, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 135553 (11) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices WILLIAM TODD LAPLANTE, #249181,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 135553 CoA: 281776 JAMES E. SODERBERG,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________ ________________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it is DENIED because MCL 600.2 963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $48.00, shall submit a copy of this order with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being filed in this Court. If plaintiff timely files the partia l fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of the deposits made to plain tiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of $327.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file furth er appeals in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. The Clerk of the Court sh all furnish two copies of th is order to plaintiff and return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
January 16, 2008
Clerk
#### Joseph YODER, et al. v. The CITY OF BATON ROUGE et al.

No. 86-C-2461.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Baton Rouge City of; Howe, William; McHugh, Tom Ed; Holden, Melvin “Kip”; Braud, David C.; Welborn, Doug; Corsentino, V.M. “Lank”; Bergeron, Gary; George, Pearl; Imes, Lynda; Roubique, Michael G.; Curry, Gordon Jr.; Peabody, Ben Jr.; Bankston, Larry S.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA-86-0589; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 298-677.

Prior report: La.App., 498 So.2d 302.

Denied.
#### AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant, v. OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY and Employers Insurance of Wausau Mutual Company, Appellees.

No. 87-865.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 15, 1988.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell *&*Hoehl and James E. Tribble and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellant.

*389Conroy, Simberg, Wilensky & Lewis and Steven J. Chackman, Hollywood, Haddad, Joseph & Jack and David K. Markarian, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. Foremost Insurance Company,*425 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); *Lehman-Eastern Auto Rentals, Inc. v. Brooks,*370 So.2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

s0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140598 & (80)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140598 COA: 286957 Wayne CC: 07-021351-FC ANGELO LAMONT WISE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 2, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to
remand is DENIED.
Exhibit 4.2


                                                        State of Delaware
                                                        Secretary of State
                                                     Division of Corporations
                                                  Delivered 12:19 PM 07/18/2005
                                                    Filed 12:19 PM 07/18/2005
                                                  SRV 0505 90471 -- 4001319 FILE

                           CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

                                      OF

                       PSE&G TRANSITION FUNDING II LLC


        This Certificate of Formation of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC (the
"LLC"), dated as of July 18, 2005, is being duly executed and filed by James
T. Foran, as an authorized person, to form a limited liability company under
the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del.C. ss.18-101, et seq.).

        FIRST. The name of the limited liability company formed hereby is
PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

        SECOND.  The address of the registered office of the LLC in the State
of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center,
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.

        THIRD.  The name and address of the registered agent for service of
process on the LLC in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company,
Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County,
Delaware 19801.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Formation as of the date first above written.

                                        /s/ James T. Foran
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Name:  James T. Foran
                                        Authorized Person
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Saanii <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 1:12 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: Re: FW: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

Shasheerah,

I am getting ready to call him and will let you know what he says. Rena  

Dinetahdoo Cultural Resources Management, LLC P.O. Box 2012, Farmington NM 87499

10076 US Hwy 371, S of Farmington, NM

Phone (505) 960‐9478Fax (505) 960‐9749

Email dinetahdoo@yahoo.com

Website: www.dinetahdoo.com

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ 

On Thu, 1/8/15, Kelly, Shaheerah <Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov> wrote:

Subject: FW: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly

To: "dinetahdoo@yahoo.com" <dinetahdoo@yahoo.com>

Date: Thursday, January 8, 2015, 1:15 PM

  

#yiv2572859877

#yiv2572859877 ‐‐ 

   

  _filtered #yiv2572859877 {panose‐1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}

  _filtered #yiv2572859877 {font‐family:Calibri;panose‐1:2 15

5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}

  _filtered #yiv2572859877 {font‐family:Verdana;panose‐1:2 11

6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}

#yiv2572859877

#yiv2572859877 p.yiv2572859877MsoNormal, #yiv2572859877  li.yiv2572859877MsoNormal, #yiv2572859877  

div.yiv2572859877MsoNormal  {margin:0in;margin‐bottom:.0001pt;font‐size:11.0pt;}

#yiv2572859877 a:link, #yiv2572859877

span.yiv2572859877MsoHyperlink

{color:#0563C1;text‐decoration:underline;}

#yiv2572859877 a:visited, #yiv2572859877  span.yiv2572859877MsoHyperlinkFollowed

{color:#954F72;text‐decoration:underline;}

#yiv2572859877 span.yiv2572859877EmailStyle17  {color:windowtext;}

#yiv2572859877 span.yiv2572859877EmailStyle18  {color:#1F497D;}

#yiv2572859877 .yiv2572859877MsoChpDefault  {font‐size:10.0pt;}

  _filtered #yiv2572859877 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}

#yiv2572859877 div.yiv2572859877WordSection1  {}

#yiv2572859877  

  

Rena,  

     

Thank you for talking with me and for
2

all the information. It would be helpful if you could let  Terry Knight at Ute Mountain know about our efforts to  contact

his office.  

     

Feel free to contact me.  

     

Thanks.   

     

  

************************************

  

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR‐3)

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9

  

San Francisco, CA 94105

  

Phone: 415‐947‐4156

  

Fax: 415‐947‐3579

  

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

  

  

     

  

  

From: Kelly,

Shaheerah  

  

Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 11:36 AM

  

To: 'dinetahdoo@yahoo.com'

  

Subject: Mailing address for Shaheerah Kelly  

  

  

     

Hi Rena,  

     

Below is my contact

information, including my mailing address.  

     

************************************

  

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division

(AIR‐3)

U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Region 9

  
3

San Francisco, CA 94105

  

Phone: 415‐947‐4156

  

Fax: 415‐947‐3579

  

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
#### Dora Garth BANKS v. STATE.

CR-91-1404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Feb. 12, 1993.

*702Dora Garth Banks, pro se.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Stephen Dodd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

McMILLAN, Judge.

The appellant appeals her conviction for theft of property in the second degree, in violation of § 13A-8-4, *Code of Alabama*1975, as a result of which she was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment.

The State requests that this court remand this cause to the trial court for a determination of the appellant’s indigency status and the voluntariness of her waiver of her right to appointed counsel on appeal. This request is based upon the fact that the record is devoid of any evidence indicating that the appellant unequivocally asserted her right of self-representation. See *McLeod v. State,*574 So.2d 882 (Ala.Cr.App.1990).

Therefore, this case is remanded to the circuit court with instructions that that court make written findings of fact regarding the appellant’s indigency status and whether a waiver hearing or any other proceeding was held concerning appellant’s right to appellate counsel on appeal. The trial court is further instructed to forward its findings to this court within 45 days of the release of this opinion.

We pretermit discussion of the issues raised by the appellant until the trial court forwards its findings to this court.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All Judges concur.
Nevada Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report, November 2014

References

2009 RH SIP. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Bureaus of Air Quality Planning 

and Air Pollution Control, Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan, October 2009. 

Carson City, Nevada. < http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html > (last viewed 

6/13/2014)

USEPA 2013. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, Geographic Strategies Group, Research Triangle Park, 

North Carolina, General Principles for the 5-Year Regional Haze State Implementation Plans 

(Intended to Assist States and EPA Regional Offices in Development and Review of the Progress 

Reports). April 2013. < http://www.4cleanair.org/Documents/haze_5year_4-10-13.pdf > (last 

viewed 6/13/2014)

USEPA 2003. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and 

Standards, Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, Air Quality Trends Analysis Group,

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions 

under the Regional Haze Rule. EPA-454/B-03-005. September 2003. 

< http://www.epa.gov/ttn/caaa/t1/memoranda/rh_envcurhr_gd.pdf > (last viewed 6/13/2014)

Weare 2003. Christopher Weare, The California Electricity Crisis: Causes and Policy Options.

Public Policy Institute of California. ISBN: 1-58213-064-7. 

< http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_103CWR.pdf > (last viewed 6/13/2014)

WestJumpAQMS 2013. Western Regional Air Partnership, West-Wide Jump-Start Air Quality 

Modeling Study – Final Report (PDF 15MB). September 30, 2013

< http://www.wrapair2.org/WestJumpAQMS.aspx > (last viewed 6/13/2014)

WRAP 2013. Western Regional Air Partnership, Western Regional Air Partnership Regional 

Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Summary Report. June 28, 2013.

< http://www.wrapair2.org/RHRPR.aspx > (last viewed 6/13/2014)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 11, 2010



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.