alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Complainant, v. William R. HEBELER, Attorney-Respondent.

No. 81SA428.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Nov. 17, 1981.

Linda Donnelly, Disciplinary Prosecutor, Denver, for complainant.

Joseph H. Paulin, Englewood, for attorney-respondent.

HODGES, Chief Justice.

Mr. Hebeler, you appear before this Court at this time to be publicly censured.

A Hearing Committee of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee conducted a hearing on a complaint by a former client of yours. The complaint alleged that in a child custody matter, you were retained by the child’s mother to prepare necessary pleadings and documents to seek a contempt citation against the child’s father who had retained custody in violation of a joint custody agreement approved by the trial court at the time the marriage was dissolved. You were also retained to prepare and file in the trial court necessary papers seeking full custody of the child by the mother.

The complaint further alleged that you failed to prepare the necessary papers; that inquiry was made of you by your client on eight to ten occasions during a period of approximately three months; and that you *255repeatedly blamed your secretary for not getting the papers completed. On each occasion, you promised to tend to the matter immediately. Finally, when nothing was done, and your client was unable to contact you by phone because both your office and home telephones had been disconnected, she filed this complaint.

After a full hearing, the Hearing Committee found that the foregoing facts were uncontroverted and were proven by clear and convincing evidence. The Hearing Committee also specifically found that you neglected and finally abandoned your client in a matter which you knew to be of great importance and immediacy to her. Your inaction caused your client great distress and unduly prevented immediate action under circumstances requiring such action.

The Grievance Committee in its report has recommended a public censure and we now adopt that recommendation. We have also noted that you have elected not to file exceptions to the findings, conclusions and recommendations set forth in the report of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee..

You are hereby publicly censured (1) for your conduct which was contrary to the highest standards of honesty, justice and morality required of all attorneys; (2) for your neglect of a legal matter entrusted to you by a client; and (3) for your failure to carry out a contract with your client. These infractions are in violation of C.R. C.P. 241(B)(4), DR6-101(A)(3) and DR7-101(A)(2) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. This conduct by you as an attorney and officer of the Court is inexcusable and will not be tolerated.

You are ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings before the Grievance Committee of this Court in the sum of $872.89. This amount must be paid by you to the Clerk of the Supreme Court within ninety (90) days of this date.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Steven Tanner, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 12,2008

 
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Steven Tanner           |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.02

                      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Karyn Miller, Chief Financial Officer of New Frontier Media, Inc.,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Frontier Media, Inc.
(the "Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and materially weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated: June 14, 2004





/s/   Karyn L. Miller
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, T. Don Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | T. Don Waddell          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   | November 14, 2007       |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 110 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas among the world's 26 richest nations, the United States accounted for 73 
        percent of child homicide victims;
Whereas at least 3 children a day die from physical abuse or chronic neglect in 
        the United States;
Whereas April has been designated as National Child Abuse Prevention Month, an 
        annual tradition started by President Jimmy Carter in 1979; and
Whereas the fourth Friday of each April is National Children's Memorial Flag 
        Day, when many State and local governmental agencies and private 
        organizations fly the Children's Memorial Flag to remember children lost 
        to violence and to heighten public awareness of the need for communities 
        to help vulnerable children and families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports National Children's Memorial Flag Day; and
            (2) encourages national, State, and local agencies and 
        private organizations to fly the Children's Memorial Flag--
                    (A) to remember children lost to violence; and
                    (B) to raise public awareness about the continuing 
                problem of violence against children.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National Children's 
                           Memorial Flag Day.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"*), I, Andrew Limpert, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | May 15, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ Andrew Limpert              |   |
|--------|--------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   |         |   |   | Andrew Limpert                  |   |
|   |         |   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |   |
|        |              |        |        |                                 |        |  |
#### Anthony RUSSELL v. Terrance ROBINSON.

85-1121.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Feb. 27, 1987.

*270Nathan P. Friedlander, Mobile, for appellant.

Thomas M. Galloway, Jr., and Linda L. Collins for Collins, Galloway & Smith, Mobile, for appellee.

TORBERT, Chief Justice.

In the early morning hours of August 24, 1985, Anthony Russell was struck by a car driven by Eric Franklin. Terrance Robinson owned the car. Russell brought suit against Franklin and against Robinson. Russell alleged that Franklin was the agent of Robinson and that Robinson had negligently entrusted his vehicle to Franklin. Robinson moved for summary judgment, and his motion was granted by the trial court. The court made that judgment final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P.; Russell appealed from that judgment as to the issue of whether Franklin was Robinson’s agent.

In *Henderson v. Winkler,*454 So.2d 1358, 1360-61 (Ala.1984), this Court set out the standard of review for a summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Ala.R. Civ.P.:

> *“*‘In reviewing a summary judgment, we must determine whether there exists any genuine issue of material fact and, if not, whether the substantive law was correctly applied to the undisputed facts.’ *Watts Construction Co. v. Cullman County,*382 So.2d 520, 522 (Ala.1980). The moving party must clearly show that no genuine issue as to any material fact exists and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law before summary judgment may be granted. If, however, there is a scintilla of evidence supporting the position of the party against whom the motion is made, summary judgment may not be granted. *Savage v. Wright,*439 So.2d 120 (Ala.1983); *Haynes v. Ford Motor Co.,*435 So.2d 1227 (Ala.1983).”

The question of agency is one of fact. *Kutack v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.,*411 So.2d 137, 139 (Ala.1982).

We have carefully examined the entire record and have found no evidence that Franklin was acting under the control or authority of Robinson when Franklin took Robinson’s car. All the evidence clearly shows that Franklin was nothing more than an acquaintance of Robinson’s and that Franklin took Robinson’s car without Robinson’s knowledge or consent. The evidence indicates that Robinson inadvertently left his keys in his car and that Franklin decided for himself to drive Robinson’s car. Even Franklin admits that he took the car without Robinson’s permission or knowledge.

There is nothing in the record that presents a scintilla of evidence of an agency relationship between Robinson and Franklin. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

MADDOX, ALMON, BEATTY and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. James W. GREEN v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 85-KH-2145.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Green, James W.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and writ of mandamus; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 43094.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 339

Designating November 18, 2000, as ‘‘National Survivors of Suicide Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 2000

Mr. REID submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating November 18, 2000, as ‘‘National Survivors of

Suicide Day’’.

Whereas the 105th Congress, in Senate Resolution 84 and

House Resolution 212, recognized suicide as a national

problem and suicide prevention as a national priority;

Whereas the Surgeon General has publicly recognized suicide

as a public health problem;

Whereas the resolutions of the 105th Congress called for a

collaboration between public and private organizations

and individuals concerned with suicide;

Whereas in the United States, more than 30,000 people take

their own lives each year;

Whereas suicide is the 8th leading cause of death in the

United States and the 3rd major cause of death among

young people aged 15 through 19;
2

•SRES 339 IS

Whereas the suicide rate among young people has more than

tripled in the last 4 decades, a fact that is a tragedy in

itself and a source of devastation to millions of family

members and loved ones;

Whereas every year in the United States, hundreds of thousands of people become suicide survivors (people that

have lost a loved one to suicide), and there are approximately 8,000,000 suicide survivors in the United States

today;

Whereas society still needlessly stigmatizes both the people

that take their own lives and suicide survivors;

Whereas there is a need for greater outreach to suicide survivors because, all too often, they are left alone to grieve;

Whereas suicide survivors are often helped to rebuild their

lives through a network of support with fellow survivors;

Whereas suicide survivors play an essential role in educating

communities about the risks of suicide and the need to

develop suicide prevention strategies; and

Whereas suicide survivors contribute to suicide prevention research by providing essential information about the environmental and genetic backgrounds of the deceased:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1)(A) designates November 18, 2000, as ‘‘Na3 tional Survivors of Suicide Day’’; and

4 (B) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling on Federal, State, and local adminis6 trators and the people of the United States to ob-
3

•SRES 339 IS

1 serve the day with appropriate programs, cere2 monies, and activities;

3 (2) encourages the involvement of suicide sur4 vivors in healing activities and prevention programs;

5 (3) acknowledges that suicide survivors face dis6 tinct obstacles in their grieving;

7 (4) recognizes that suicide survivors can be a

8 source of support and strength to each other;

9 (5) recognizes that suicide survivors have

10 played a leading role in organizations dedicated to

11 reducing suicide through research, education, and

12 treatment programs; and

13 (6) acknowledges the efforts of suicide survivors

14 in their prevention, education, and advocacy activi15 ties to eliminate stigma and to reduce the incidence

16 of suicide.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIE JOHNSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 539 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent
                          -----------------------------

The Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Ramtron International Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-12265, 333-33554, 333-60594 and 333-66252) on Form S-8 and
(333-19119, 333-47615, 333-87107, 333-95209, 333-42106 and 333-95209) on Form
S-3 of Ramtron International Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated
February 7, 2003, except as to the last paragraph of note 13 and note 18,
which are as of March 31, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheet of Ramtron International Corporation as of December 31, 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002,
annual report on Form 10-K of Ramtron International Corporation.

Our report dated February 7, 2003, except as to the last paragraph of note 13
and note 18, which are as of March 31, 2003, contains an explanatory
paragraph relating to the fact that the consolidated financial statements of
Ramtron International Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001
and for each of the years in the two-year period then ended were audited by
other auditors who have ceased operations.  As described in Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements, those consolidated financial statements
have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002.
However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the
2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements of Ramtron International
Corporation and subsidiaries other than with respect to such disclosures and,
accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on
the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

/S/  KPMG LLP
-------------
KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 31, 2003

                                    Page-1
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Blodgett, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respect, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:  February 12,
2009
              /s/ Robert M. BlodgettRobert
      M. BlodgettChief
      Financial Officer