alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

                                          Translated from Romanian into English.


                           CONTRACT OF BUYING-SELLING
                            No. 7/3-01(January) 2000
                                ---------------


                             1. CONTRACTING PARTIES
SELLER: "ILITAX-PAC" LTD, the office is situated in Chisinau, Dacia str. 30/1,
ap. 133, tel: 55.84.96, t/a 19569010. Moldincombank Telecomtrans, s/a
2251132001225, b/a 280101332, represented by manager David Gvedasvili.

BUYER:                 "ASCONI" LTD,
      --------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Universalbank, t/a 231582, VAT code 6700446,
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       s/a 22240001016
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

concluded the following Contract of buying-selling with observance of following
conditions:

                              2. CONTRACT SUBJECTS
Art.1. The SELLER is obligated to sell and the BUYER is obligated to buy the
goods, corrugated board boxes. The sides in the appendixes that will be added to
the following contract will mention the sort, quantity and price.

                     3. LOADING, TRANSPORTATION, DOCUMENTS,
                              RECEIVING, SHIPMENT
Art.2. The goods will be loaded and transported from the "ILITAX-PAC" LTD office
by the Buyer. The Buyer will support transportation expenses.
Art.3. The sold goods will be accompanied with invoice and driver's trip ticket.
Art.4. Delegate Vrabie Vasile will receipt the goods at the SELLER'S office and
will sign the delivery documents.

                                 4. GUARANTEES
Art.5. The SELLER gives guarantee for the quality of the sold goods, to the
BUYER.

                               5. PRICE, PAYMENT
Art.6. The goods prices are specified in the appendixes which are added to the
following contract.
Payment will be done in USA dollars, at the rate that will be fixed at the
moment of selling of the goods. The BUYER is obligated to pay advanced.

                         6. CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITY
Art.7. If the following contract is partial infringed or total infringed, the
guilty side is obligated to pay the money damage.

     SELLER                                                 BUYER

"ILITAX-PAC" LTD                                        "ASCONI" LTD
                                                        ------------

Official negotiators                                Official negotiators
David Gvedasvili                                    _____________________


The translation from Romanian into English was checked in the office of the
"INTACT-SERVICE" Ltd.
           Director                       /T. Chukhatskaya-Kirilov/
                                                  Stamp
                                    [SEAL]
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 374 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 374

  Designating October 17, 2000, as a ``Day of National Concern About 
                    Young People and Gun Violence''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 12 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

   Mrs. Murray (for herself and Mr. Warner) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating October 17, 2000, as a ``Day of National Concern About 
                    Young People and Gun Violence''.

Whereas young people are our Nation's most important resource, and we, as a 
        society, have a vested interest in enabling children to grow in an 
        environment free from fear and violence;
Whereas young people can, by taking responsibility for their own decisions and 
        actions, and by positively influencing the decisions and actions of 
        others, help chart a new and less violent direction for the entire 
        Nation;
Whereas students in every school district in the Nation will be invited to take 
        part in a day of nationwide observance involving millions of their 
        fellow students, and will thereby be empowered to see themselves as 
        significant agents in a wave of positive social change; and
Whereas the observance of October 17, 2000, as a ``Day of National Concern About 
        Young People and Gun Violence'' will allow students to make a positive 
        and earnest decision about their future in that such students will have 
        the opportunity to voluntarily sign the ``Student Pledge Against Gun 
        Violence'', and promise that they will never take a gun to school, will 
        never use a gun to settle a dispute, and will actively use their 
        influence in a positive manner to prevent friends from using guns to 
        settle disputes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 17, 2000, as a ``Day of National 
        Concern About Young People and Gun Violence''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the school children of the United States to observe 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gail FELDER, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. HEIM CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross Appellant, and Positive Safety Manufacturing Company and A & M Machinery Company, Inc., Appellees.

No. 87-0076.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 9, 1987.

Kevin A. Malone of Krupnick, Campbell, Malone & Roselli, Fort Lauderdale, for Felder.

Valerie Shea and Mary Lingerfelt of Conrad, Scherer & James, Fort Lauderdale, for Heim Corp.

*1130Gary Gerrard of Haddad, Josephs & Jack, Coral Gables, for A & M Machinery.

R. Fred Lewis of Magill & Lewis, P.A., Miami, for Positive Safety Mfg.

LETTS, Judge.

A plaintiff, who in May of 1984 tragically lost several fingers while operating a press brake machine which was sold to the original purchaser in March of 1972, appeals an adverse summary final judgment entered against her. We affirm.

Needless to say, the summary judgment was based on the since repealed twelve year Statute of Repose. *See Pullum v. Cincinnati, Inc.,*476 So.2d 657 (Fla.1985). As a consequence, this cause falls into the same category as a host of other cases of great public importance now before our Supreme Court by reason of certified questions.

We find no reason to elaborate on the facts or the issues and content ourselves with a parroting of the same two certified questions which we employed in *Willer v. Pierce,*505 So.2d 441 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), and *Carroll v. Volkswagen of America,*508 So.2d 556 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), to wit:

> 1. DOES THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IN *PULLAM*APPLY RETROACTIVELY SO AS TO BAR CAUSES OF ACTION THAT ACCRUED BEFORE THE DATE OF THAT DECISION?

> 2. SHOULD THE ABOLITION OF THE TWELVE YEAR STATUTE OF REPOSE BY THE LEGISLATURE BE CONSTRUED TO OPERATE RETROACTIVELY TO PRESERVE CAUSES OF ACTION THAT ACCRUED PRIOR THERETO?

We do not deem it necessary at this time to address the issue raised by the cross appeal.

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM FORM
10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000849101
<NAME>                        Avado Brands, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Jan-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              Jan-02-2000
<CASH>                                         11,267
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,257
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     9,097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               46,225
<PP&E>                                        424,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                656,596
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          84,517
<BONDS>                                       215,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         115,000
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          405
<OTHER-SE>                                    112,219
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  656,596
<SALES>                                       644,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              644,459
<CGS>                                         182,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 561,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             24,073
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 7,920
<INCOME-TAX>                                    2,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             5,470
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    5,470
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.20


</TABLE>
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 107

Expressing a declaration of space leadership.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 25, 2001

Mr. WELDON of Florida (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Science, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing a declaration of space leadership.

Whereas the continued exploration, development, and use of

space is critical to our Nation’s future as we enter a new

millennium;

Whereas America’s investment in space has worked to feed

the human hunger for exploration, knowledge, and discovery;

Whereas our national commitment and work in space have

helped to profoundly shape our Nation by saving lives by

enhancing our well-being here on earth;

Whereas it is evident that an aggressive national commitment

by government, industry, and the public to the continued
2

•HCON 107 IH

exploration and use of space will serve to strengthen

America’s leadership in the global economy in the new

millennium;

Whereas space is vital to not only a peaceful, but a prosperous world;

Whereas space has been and will continue to be a critical

driver of the American economy, which translates into

jobs and prosperity for all Americans;

Whereas only true visionary leadership for space will bring

forth economic leadership for future generations of Americans; and

Whereas space is a key to unlocking future economic power

through a furtherance of education, a commitment to

safety, an improvement in communications, the advancement of health care, and better stewardship of our environment: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress declares its support for

3 the strongest possible commitment to space exploration

4 and development as a national priority. The Congress de5 clares that in order to protect America’s personal and eco6 nomic health, and realize continued economic prosperity

7 and leadership, we as a nation must give our highest com8 mitment to—

9 (1) policies that ensure economic opportunities

10 in the new burgeoning market that space offers;
3

•HCON 107 IH

1 (2) United States global leadership and com2 petitive advantage in the development of commercial

3 space products and services;

4 (3) space defense systems that allow our armed

5 forces the greatest advantage in guarding our na6 tional security and defending American people and

7 our interests;

8 (4) assurance that the National Aeronautics

9 and Space Administration can guarantee American

10 leadership in the exploration of space and the devel11 opment of advanced technologies; and

12 (5) policies that promote private investment in

13 space products and services.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,127,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,500
<INVENTORY>                                    320,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,790,371
<PP&E>                                          75,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,833,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          554,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,862
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,230,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,833,648
<SALES>                                      1,483,218
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,535,239
<CGS>                                          644,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,258,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (722,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (722,777)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (722,777)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.02)
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

DUSTI KELLY-FLEMING, JOHN FLEMING, AND

TECLARC, INC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

THE CITY OF SELMA, TEXAS,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-1231

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Texas in No. 5:10-cv-00675-XR, Judge 

Xavier Rodriguez.

______________________ 

Before LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

The parties were directed to show cause why this appeal should not be transferred to the United States Court 

of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Appellee, the City of 

Selma, Texas, responds and argues that the appeal should 

be dismissed or transferred to the Fifth Circuit. Appellants have not responded. 

Case: 14-1231 Document: 8 Page: 1 Filed: 04/23/2014
2 KELLY-FLEMING v. THE CITY OF SELMA, TEXAS

This is an appeal of an action asserting violation of 

the plaintiffs’ rights under Title II of the Americans with 

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq. 

This court is a court of limited jurisdiction and does 

not have jurisdiction in this matter. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. As 

noted by Appellee, an appeal has also been filed with the 

Fifth Circuit as Dusti Kelly-Fleming, et al. v. City of 

Selma, Texas, No. 13-51192. Thus, there is no need to 

transfer this duplicative appeal pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1631. 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All pending motions are denied as moot.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court

s25

Case: 14-1231 Document: 8 Page: 2 Filed: 04/23/2014
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-30559 and No. 333-57507), Form S-4 (File No.
333-82632), and Form S-8 (File No. 33-42354, No. 33-63510, No. 33-79654, No.
33-79756, No. 33-79664, No. 333-48357, No. 333-68815, No. 333-81821, and No.
333-94405) of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. of our report dated February 13,
2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. and of our report dated March 25, 2003
relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., which appear in this Form 10-K.




PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 2003
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.**I, Donna G. Lee, Chief Financial Officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc. certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:February 17, 2006         /s/ Donna G. Lee         Name: Donna G. Lee    Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### SETZER’S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Ahmed HEBEISHY, Appellee.

No. BS-260.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 10, 1988.

Jack W. Shaw, Jr., P.A., and Mary Bland Love, of Mathews, Osborne, McNatt, Go-belman & Cobb, Jacksonville, for appellants.

Frederick B. Tygart, of Sharp & Tygart, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.

SHIVERS, Judge.

The employer/carrier (E/C) in this workers’ compensation case appeal the deputy commissioner’s order finding the claimant to be permanently and totally disabled (PTD) from his May 28, 1984 industrial accident. We agree that the award of PTD benefits was erroneous, and reverse the order.

The evidence introduced at the hearing before the deputy commissioner indicates that the claimant sustained both a physical back injury and psychological symptoms of anxiety and depression as the result of his industrial accident. The evidence does not, however, support a finding that the claimant has reached maximum medical improvement with regard to both the physical and psychiatric conditions. Dr. Stinson, claimant’s treating psychiatrist, testified only *366that he expected claimant to be unable to work “in the foreseeable future,” but that he expected his anxiety and depression to improve, that he was in need of continued treatment, and that the anxiety and depression should be “attended to before we can say that he has reached MMI.” Since there is a lack of competent substantial evidence to support a finding that claimant has reached MMI with regard to both his physical and psychological conditions, we reverse the deputy commissioner’s award of PTD benefits. *Martin-Marietta Corp. v. Vargas,*472 So. 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *Fuchs Baking Co. v. Estate of Szlosek,*466 So.2d 415 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *South Carolina Insurance Co. v. Blackman,*380 So. 2d 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980).

REVERSED.

JOANOS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.