alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended June 30, 2007 of the Claymore MACROshares Oil Up Holding Trust (the " **Registrant** " ),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " **Quarterly
      Report** " ),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** " ),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.








Date:
      August 14, 2007


/s/
                  Samuel Masucci, III
                
                Samuel
                  Masucci, III
                On
                  behalf of the Registrant
                and
                  as Chief Executive Officer
#### Mila Jane Burnett REISZNER v. Kenneth Dean REISZNER.

No. 86-CC-2420.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Reiszner, Kenneth Dean; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, and supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 000000; Parish of East Baton Rouge, Family Court of East Baton Rouge, Div. “B”, No. 50666.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
#### Doak WATTIGNEY, Janis Mickles Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD.

No. 87-C-0827.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Wattigney, Doak; Mickles, Janis; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86 CA 594; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 247717.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 1089.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

      ( print page 16818)    

# TIME AND DATE:

Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

# PLACE:

Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public

## Matters To Be Considered

                    1.                     *Decisional Matter:*                     Fiscal Year 2012 Operating Plan.                

                    2.                     *Briefing Matter:*                     § 1112: Lab Withdrawal, Codification & Audit Provisions.                

                    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *www.cpsc.gov/​webcast*. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: March 20, 2012.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7083 Filed 3-20-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|              | /s/ Curtis M. Akey                           |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| November 14, 2007 | Curtis M. Akey                               |
|              | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Stein, Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

/s/ Joseph Stein                   

Joseph Stein

Vice President 

EPL Intermediate, Inc.

May 12, 2006

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

 

----
#### Wayne MILLS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57828.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Nov. 16, 1988.

Joseph E. Roberts, Jr., Cothren & Pittman, Jackson, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by Deirdre D. McCrory, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Rankin County; R.L. Goza, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ANDERSON and ZUCCARO, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. Robert G. ROCKY v. John T. KING, et al.

No. 88-KH-0090.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Rocky, Robert G.; applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or *417remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 275138.

Granted for purpose of transferring. Transferred to Court of Appeal for consideration and disposition.
#### Florence L. Roland, Plaintiff *v.*Shirley A. Slesinger, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 25, 1959.

*1088
      *Stuart Edward Levison*and *Belle Seiiel*for defendant.

*Samuel M. Zuckermcm*for plaintiff.

Aron Steuer, J.

Motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The first and third causes of action are in slander. They purport to set out the words spoken by putting them in quotation marks but qualify the alleged quotations by saying the words are “ substantially as follows ”. A complaint in slander must set out the exact words *(Al Raschid*v. *News Syndicate Co.,*265 N. Y. 1). An approximation is not sufficient *(Cooke*v. *Dodge,*168 Misc. 561).

The second cause of action is difficult to classify. It alleges that at unusual hours of the day and night plaintiff’s telephone would ring and when plaintiff picked up the receiver no one would be on the wire. At other times plaintiff would hear insulting remarks. It is alleged that these calls were made by defendant or at her instance. Insult that is not defamatory is not actionable. As for the calls which were obviously for the purpose of annoyance, for the purposes of this motion it must be assumed that, these were, as alleged, made by or at the instance of defendant. But mere annoying conduct does not give rise to a cause of action. It is different where it is sufficiently aggravated to cause damage but no damage is alleged. Or if it amounts to a nuisance it may he enjoined. This is not sought.

Motion is granted with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint on or before March 6, 1959.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edwin C. Quattlebaum, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, President and
Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the "Registrant"),
certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended September 30,
2005 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

          By:                     /s/ EDWIN C. QUATTLEBAUM
             -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Edwin C. Quattlebaum, Ph.D.
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT AND CO-CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
                                         DIRECTORS OF
                                       METAMORPHIX, INC.

Date:  December 15, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 83 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 83

 Commending the people of Iran for their commitment to the democratic 
    process and positive political reform on the occasion of Iran's 
                        parliamentary elections.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 24, 2000

 Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Wellstone) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the people of Iran for their commitment to the democratic 
    process and positive political reform on the occasion of Iran's 
                        parliamentary elections.

Whereas the Islamic Republic of Iran held parliamentary elections on February 
        18, 2000;
Whereas more than 75 percent of the approximately 39,000,000 eligible voters 
        cast ballots in the elections;
Whereas preliminary results indicate that reformers have won a parliamentary 
        majority, freeing Iran's parliament, the Majlis, of hard-line domination 
        for the first time since the 1979 Iranian revolution;
Whereas reformers won elections despite concerted efforts by hard-line Iranian 
        clergy to ban reformist forces from the ballot; and
Whereas the elections show a clear preference by a majority of Iranian voters 
        for democracy, rule of law, and improved relations with Western nations: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) commends the people of Iran for their commitment to the 
        democratic process;
            (2) congratulates reformist parliamentarians on their 
        recent electoral victory;
            (3) reaffirms the desire of the United States to see free, 
        democratic political development, the restoration of the rule 
        of law, and full civil and political rights for all Iranians; 
        and
            (4) calls on the Government of Iran to rejoin the community 
        of nations and renounce terrorism, opposition to the Middle 
        East peace process, and the development and acquisition of 
        weapons of mass destruction.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Arnold Schildhaus, Petitioner, against Justices of the Court of Special Sessions, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 16, 1959.

*Arnold Schildhaus,*petitioner in person.

*Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Elias Low of*counsel), for respondents appearing specially.

*676Aron Steuer, J.

In this matter the petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition against respondents, the Justices of the Court of Special Sessions, to prevent them from hearing or determining five proceedings now pending in that court. Unfortunately, a difference arose between the offices of the Attorney-General and the Corporation Counsel as to which was the proper person to represent the respondents. Each claimed that the duty devolved upon the other. Apparently the latter has now undertaken the defense. So far he has challenged the service and has requested time to answer or move in respect to the petition. As no prejudice will result to the petitioner from a reasonable adjournment, only the question of service will be considered on this application.

Service of a writ of prohibition is governed by section 1289 of the Civil Practice Act. It is to be made in the manner provided for the personal service of a summons in an action. *“*Service on a court consisting of three or more judges may be made by serving a majority of them.” The foregoing quotation is from the section.

Several interesting questions arise on the service, none of which have ever been judicially determined. However, one fact is determinative. Whatever service was attempted was made by the petitioner. Section 220 of the Civil Practice Act, providing for the method of service of a summons in an action, states clearly that it must be served by a person who is not a party to the action. This would bar petitioner, as the provisions of section 1289 requiring the same method of service as in an action, make no exception in this regard. The service being improper, the petition is dismissed without prejudice. This decision may well he regarded as technical, but not as regrettable. The petitioner is known to virtually every member of this court as a practitioner insisting on meticulous observation of every technicality. He should be the last to complain if his own lapse provides a weapon against him.
Baseline 2006 Anthropogenic E missions Modeled for Matagorda County

Emission Sources NOx (tpd) CB05 -VOC (tpd) Elev_Points 2.22 0.65 Low_Points 1. 59 1. 72 Sum_Points 3. 81 2. 37 On- Road Mobile 3.16 0.91 Non - Road Mobile 3.44 6.33 Area 6.25 30.16 Total 16. 66 39. 77
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification



I, Joseph Stein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |  |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 16, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Joseph
Stein                      
|                      |  |  |  | Joseph Stein Vice President and
Treasurer



2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Malcolm FLEURY.

No. 88-KH-0363.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Fleury, Malcolm; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 319-225; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-9070.

Prior report: La.App., 519 So.2d 206.

Denied. Adequate remedy in the event of conviction.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1906

CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INCORPORATED,

Petitioner,

and

ARTHUR CARPENTER,

Claimant,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(01-841)

Submitted: March 4, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Robert A. Rapaport, Dana Adler Rosen, CLARKE, DOLPH, RAPAPORT,

HARDY & HULL, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. Eugene

Scalia, Acting Solicitor of Labor, John F. Depenbrock, Associate

Solicitor for Employee Benefits, Burke Wong, Whitney R. Given,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ceres Marine Terminals seeks review of the Benefits Review

Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s

denial of special fund relief under § 8(f) of the Longshore and

Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 908(f) (2000). Our

review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based

upon substantial evidence. See Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v.

DOWCP, No. 01-841 (BRB July 17, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

The petition for review is accordingly

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joseph Stein, Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------
|                  
|                  
|                   |  | /s/
	      Joseph Stein               
|                   |  | Joseph Stein
Vice President of Finance
|                   |  | EPL Intermediate, Inc.                

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will
be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32



      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael H. Lee,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Michael H. Lee
------------------
Michael H. Lee
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 9, 2005
----------------





/s/ Francis M. Colalucci
------------------------
Francis M. Colalucci
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
November 9, 2005
----------------



                                       29