alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Knox KLECKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 86-192.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Feb. 4, 1987.

*214Ralph W. Stephenson, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

McHale, Bufkin and Dees, Michael K. Dees, Lake Charles, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before DOUCET, LABORDE and KING, JJ.

LABORDE, Judge.

Plaintiff, William Kleckley, petitioned for and received a restricted driver’s license as provided for in LSA-R.S. 32:415.1. Defendant, Louisiana Department of Public Safety, appeals the order granting the license on two distinct grounds: (1) that plaintiffs petition failed to state a cause of action; and (2) that the trial court erred in failing to allow the statutorily mandated ten days notice to the Department before setting the hearing date, as provided for in LSA-R.S. 32:414 F(4). Plaintiff has not answered this appeal. We reverse.

In order for a restricted driver’s license to be granted, it must be the driver’s first suspension. *Sibley v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety,*385 So.2d 505 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980); *Perry v. State, Department of Public Safety, Driver’s License Division,*353 So.2d 318 (La.App. 1st Cir.1977), *writ denied,*354 So.2d 1385 (La.1978).

Plaintiff failed to state in his petition that this was his first suspension; therefore, he has failed to state a cause of action. *Mango v. State, Department of Public Transportation,*425 So.2d 350 (La. App. 3d Cir.1982); *Freeman v. State, Department of Public Safety,*420 So.2d 1246 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982); *Crooks v. Department of Public Safety,*401 So.2d 638 (La. App. 3d Cir.), *writ denied,*404 So.2d 1257 (La.1981). We need not discuss the merit of the other ground, nor need we grant plaintiff permission to amend the pleadings so as to state a cause of action. Plaintiff's driving record, annexed to the Department’s answer, shows a previous suspension of plaintiff’s license; therefore, a remand would be a futile gesture. *See Michel v. State, Through Department of Public Safety,*388 So.2d 130, 131-32 (La. App. 1st Cir.1980).

For the above and foregoing reasons, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and appellee’s petition is dismissed with prejudice. All costs of the trial court and of this appeal are taxed to appellee, William Knox Kleckley.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.
# Fourt h Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 9, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00427

- CV

IN RE Gustavo GARCIA

- SILLER, Archbishop of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Acting on Behalf of the Archdiocese of San Antonio, and Anita Valencia, as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Virgilio Elizondo,

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 08589

Honorable Karen H. Pozza , Judge Presiding

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1



## O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Br yan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On October 9, 2020, relators filed an Opposed Thi rd Motion for Emergency R e lief, requesting a stay of the trial court ’ s August 4, 2020 “ Order on Motion to Compel

, ” including the

trial court ’ s decision to stay compliance with the contested order until October 13, 2020 at 5:00

p.m. After consideration , relators ’ requ e st for a stay is GRANTED . The trial court ’ s August 4, 2020 order

, as extended on September 30, 202 0

, i s ST AYED pending f urther order of this

court.

1 T his proceeding arises out of Cause No

. 2015

- CI

- 08589 , styled John Doe v. Roman Cathol ic Archdiocese of San Antonio, by and through the Apostolic Administrator and Archbishop Gust avo Garcia

- Siller and Archbishop

Em eritus Patrick Flores, their predeces sors a nd s uccessors, as Archbishop of the R oman Catholic Archdiocese of
San Antonio, Father Jesus Armando Dominguez, the Estate of Father Virgilio Elizondo, Deceased; Bishop Gerald

R. Barnes, his predecessors and succes sors, as Bishop of the Diocese of San Berna rdin o, in its assumed or common

name; the Roman Catholic Bishop of San Bernardino, a Corporate sole aka Diocese of San Bernardino , pending in

the 131st Judicial District Court

, B exar County, Texas, the Honorable K aren H. Pozza p residing.P ER CURIAM

ATTE STED TO: _________________________

____

Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19303-19304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7694]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4058-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2011-0001]


Indiana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19304]]

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana (FEMA-4058-DR), dated March 9, 2012, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: March 22, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Indiana is hereby amended to include the Public 
Assistance program for the following areas among those areas determined 
to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster 
by the President in his declaration of March 9, 2012.

    Clark, Jefferson, Ripley, Scott, and Washington Counties for 
Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-7694 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 

## RECEIVED 1 

## JUN 2 42015 National Business Aviation Association, Inc., 

### et a!. PART 16 DOCKETS Complainants, FAA Docket No. 16-15-08 v. Town ofEast Hampton, NY Respondent.
RESPONDENT TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, NEWYORK'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 

### Designation ofpersons to receive servicefor the Town ofEast Hampton, New York:

Elizabeth Vail Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 11937 EVail@EHamptonNY.Gov W. Eric Pilsk Catherine van Heuven Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 epilsk@kaplankirsch.com cvanheuven@kaplankirsch.com Telephone: (202) 955-5600 Facsimile: (202) 955-5616The TownofEast Hampton, New York (the "Town"), pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 16.26, hereby moves to dismiss the Complaint inits entirety for failure to state a claim that warrants investigation orfurther actionby the FAA on two grounds: 

### I. Complainants' claim that the Local Laws adopted on April 16, 2015, as amended on May 7, 2015, violate Assurance 23 must be dismissed because NBAAfails to allege that the Local Laws had an anti-competitive
ormonopolistic effect as required to state a violation ofAssurance 23. 2. Complainants' claim ofrevenue diversion must be dismissed because Assurance 25 does not prohibit an airport sponsor from using airport
revenues to defend airport rules and regulations, including the payment of legal fees. Accordingly, and for the reasons set forth in greater detail in the Memorandum ofPoints and Authorities filed herewith, the Complaint should be dismissed. Respectfully submitted this 24th day ofJune, 2015.

Elizabeth Vail Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton 159 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY 11937 EVaii@EHamptonNY.Gov 

### ~t:::~ W. Eric Pilsk Catherine van Heuven Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, D.C. 20036 epilsk@kaplankirsch.com cvanheuven@kaplankirsch.com Telephone: (202) 955-5600 Facsimile: (202) 955-5616



### 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 24th day ofJune, 2015, servedthe foregoing Respondent Town ofEast Hampton, New York's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint on the following partiesbyhand delivery at the following addresses: Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, D.C. 20591
Steve Brown ChiefOperating Officer National Business Aviation Association, Inc. 1200 G Street, NW Suite II00 Washington, D.C. 20005
Dated this'24 dayofJv1,{'2015. W. Eric Pilsk

3
**Exhibit        21**

**List        of Subsidiaries of the Registrant **

| **Name**                                               | **State                  of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |                                        |
| ACRS                  Local Communications Inc.        | Delaware                                    |
| C2                  Communications Technologies Inc.   | Delaware                                    |
| C2                  Investments Inc.                   | Delaware                                    |
| I-Link                  Worldwide LLC                  | Utah                                        |
| I-Link                  Systems Inc.                   | Utah                                        |
| Mibridge                  Inc.                         | Utah                                        |
| Vianet                  Technologies                   | Israel                                      |
| Waters                  Edge Scanning Associates, Inc. | Utah                                        |
| WebtoTel                  Inc.                         | Delaware                                    |
| CPT-1                  Holdings Inc.                   | Delaware                                    |
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.











Date:
March 17, 2011

By:
/s/ Andrew LimpertAndrew LimpertChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Roy George WHITCRAFT, III, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Aug. 2, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Robert Kalter, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Margarita Muina Febres, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Roy George Whitcraft, III, challenges his conviction and sentence for second-degree murder. He maintains that 1) the trial court erred in failing to reduce the first-degree murder charge to manslaughter and 2) the trial court erred in failing to define the term “criminal agency” when requested to do so by the jury. We find no merit in Whitcraft’s contentions and affirm. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.410, 3.420; *see Spence v. State,*515 So.2d 312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); *Larsen v. State,*485 So.2d 1372 (Fla. 1st DCA), *aff'd,*492 So.2d 1333 (Fla.1986); *Parker v. State,*336 So.2d 426 (Fla. 1st DCA), *appeal and cert. dismissed,*341 So.2d 292 (Fla.1976).

Affirmed.

NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ., concur.

FERGUSON, Judge

(concurring).

There are two reasons why a failure to define criminal agency in this case was not erroneous: (1) on the evidence the jury *999error. could have found that the defendant was the principal in the perpetration of the brutal homicide, and (2) the defendant rejected the court’s offer to give a clear and concise definition of agency from Black’s Law Dictionary on grounds that “examples” of such agency were not included in the definition.1 Giving “examples” of agency was certain to create confusion and possibly

1

. Initially the court offered to give the following definition:

> Agency includes every relation in which one person acts for or represents another by the latter’s authority.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On February 9 and February 13, 2012 respectively, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of permit applications received. The permits were issued on March 16, 2012 to:                

Robert A. Blanchette, Permit No. 2012-013;

H. William Detrich, III, Permit No. 2012-014;

Laurie Connell, Permit No. 2012-015.

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-6802 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Meria James Bradley v. Robert F. Authur

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00065

- CV

Trial court case number: 2011

- 57020

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Request for a Free Copy of the Trial Transcript and the

Clerk Records.” The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed on March 10, 2015 , but a reporter’s

record has not been filed and the trial court reporter has inf ormed this Court that appellant has

not requested the preparation of a reporter’s record. We grant a ppellant’s request for a copy of

the clerk’s record and direct the trial court clerk to send a copy of the clerk’s record to appellant

within 7 days of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 21 , 2015
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 138I |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6328 ta' April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 138I

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6328 ta' April 2020

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informazzjoni |
| | INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA |
| | Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni marbuta mar-Regolament (UE) 2020/560 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) Nru 508/2014 u (UE) Nru 1379/2013 f’dak li għandu x’jaqsam ma’ miżuri speċifiċi biex jittaffa l-impatt tat-tifqigħa tal-COVID-19 fuq is-settur tas-sajd u tal-akkwakultura | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

IV   Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea

2020/C 138 I/01

Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni marbuta mar-Regolament (UE) 2020/560 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) Nru 508/2014 u (UE) Nru 1379/2013 f’dak li għandu x’jaqsam ma’ miżuri speċifiċi biex jittaffa l-impatt tat-tifqigħa tal-COVID-19 fuq is-settur tas-sajd u tal-akkwakultura

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

IV Informazzjoni

INFORMAZZJONI MINN ISTITUZZJONIJIET, KORPI, UFFIĊĊJI U AĠENZIJI TAL-UNJONI EWROPEA

Il-Kummissjoni Ewropea

| 28.4.2020 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CI 138/1

---

Dikjarazzjoni tal-Kummissjoni marbuta mar-Regolament (UE) 2020/560 tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill li jemenda r-Regolamenti (UE) Nru 508/2014 u (UE) Nru 1379/2013 f’dak li għandu x’jaqsam ma’ miżuri speċifiċi biex jittaffa l-impatt tat-tifqigħa tal-COVID-19 fuq is-settur tas-sajd u tal-akkwakultura

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Il-Kummissjoni tilqa’ l-adozzjoni ta’ malajr min-naħa tal-Parlament Ewropew u tal-Kunsill tal-proposta tagħha biex temenda l-Fond Ewropew għall-Affarijiet Marittimi u s-Sajd biex jittaffa l-impatt tat-tifqigħa tal-COVID-19 u biex jiġu megħjunin is-sajjieda u l-produtturi tal-akkwakultura tagħna.

Il-Kummissjoni tixtieq tenfasizza li l-kontroll tas-sajd u l-ġbir tad-data xjentifika huma importanti ferm għall-ġestjoni sostenibbli tal-istokkijiet tal-ħut abbażi tal-aqwa parir xjentifiku disponibbli u għal infurzar affidabbli. It-tnaqqis tar-riżorsi finanzjarji għalihom ma għandux iwassal għal deterjorament fl-eżiti ta’ dawn l-elementi essenzjali tal-politika komuni tas-sajd.

Il-Kummissjoni tixtieq tenfasizza li l-proposta tagħha u l-emendi li sarulha jindirizzaw is-sitwazzjoni unika ta’ kriżi li ħolqot it-tifqigħa tal-COVID-19 u l-ħtieġa eċċezzjonali u immedjata li jingħata appoġġ biex jiġu indirizzati l-konsegwenzi ta’ dik it-tifqigħa. Huma ma jistgħux jippreġudikaw ir-Regolament futur dwar il-Fond Ewropew għall-Affarijiet Marittimi u s-Sajd.

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2112

_____________________________

NICHOLAS JAMES ALBRECHT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Melissa G. Olin, Judge.

April 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Olivia M. Goodman of O’Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Zachary Lawton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of reporting requirements submitted for OMB Review.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), agencies are required to submit proposed reporting and recordkeeping requirements to OMB for review and approval, and to publish a notice in the **Federal Register** notifying the public that the agency has made such a submission.

# DATES:

Submit comments on or before April 30, 2012. If you intend to comment but cannot prepare comments promptly, please advise the OMB Reviewer and the Agency Clearance Officer before the deadline.

*Copies:* Request for clearance (OMB 83-1), supporting statement, and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from the Agency Clearance Officer.

# ADDRESSES:

Address all comments concerning this notice to: *Agency Clearance Officer,* Curtis Rich, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20416; and *OMB Reviewer,* Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Curtis Rich, Agency Clearance Officer, (202) 205-7030.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Title:* “Transaction Report on Loans Serviced by lenders”.

*Frequency:* On Occasion.

*SBA Form Number:* 172.

*Description of Respondents:* SBA Lenders.

*Responses:* 4,724.

*Annual Burden:* 56,688.

Curtis Rich,

Acting Chief, Administrative Information Branch.

[FR Doc. 2012-7501 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P