alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEIVED ON:

STATE OF IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY t,' EC 2 8 2U15 Avvf EPA Region 10 Office of the Regional Administrator

1410 North Hilton • Boise, Idaho 83706 • (208) 373-0502 C.L. "Butch" Otter, Governor www.deq.idaho.gov John H. Tippets, Director December 22, 2015 RECEIVED

Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator USEPA Region 10, MS RA-140 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 RE: One-year extension request of the attainment date for the Logan UT/ID Nonattainment Area
Dear Mr. McLerran: The Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) hereby requests a one-year extension of the attainment date for the Idaho portion of the Logan UT/1D nonattainment area (NAA). Idaho believes that the entire NAA, including the Utah portion, qualifies for the one-year extension of the attainment date. Franklin County, Idaho, a sparsely populated rural area, was designated as part of the cross border Logan UT/ID NAA for PM 2.5 , effective December 14, 2009 (74 FR 58688). Straddling the border between Utah and Idaho, this NAA presents unique challenges with respect to topographical features and jurisdictional authority issues a NAA that spans two states (UtahIdaho) and two EPA regions (Region 8-Region 10). As required by the CAA, DEQ submitted a Nonattainment State Implementation Plan (SIP) to address air quality issues on the Idaho side of the Logan UT/ID PM 2,5 NAA to EPA. By submitting this plan DEQ met all CAA regulatory deadlines for PM 2,5 NAAs. The initial plan, submitted in December 2012, satisfied requirements from EPA's 2007 Fine Particle Implementation Rule, which was grounded in the CAA, Title I, Part Subpart 1. In December 2014, DEQ submitted a PM 25 SIP amendment to satisfy federal PM25 SIP requirements under CAA, Title I, Part D, Subpart 4, as required by the Identification of Nonattainment Classification and Deadlines for Submission of State Implementation Plan (SIP) Provisions for the 1997 Fine Particle (PM 25 ) NAAQS and the 2006 PM2 5 NAAQS final rule (79 FR 31566). On March 25, 2014, EPA approved some of the control measures contained in Idaho's 2012 submittal (79 FR 16201). On July 18, 2014, EPA also approved the comprehensive emissions inventory of PM 2.5 and precursors required under CAA section 172(c)(3) (79 FR 41904). Then, on November 9, 2015 (50 FR 69172) EPA proposed to reclassify the Idaho portion of the multi-state Logan UT/ID NAA to serious nonattainment. In a companion proposal Office Of Air, Wztole-i$tTl~
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 37

To express gratitude for the service of the Chief Justice of the United

States as Presiding Officer during the impeachment trial.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To express gratitude for the service of the Chief Justice

of the United States as Presiding Officer during the

impeachment trial.

Whereas article I, section 3, clause 6 of the Constitution of

the United States provide that, when the President of the

United States is tried on articles of impeachment, the

Chief Justice of the United States shall preside over the

Senate;

Whereas, pursuant to rule IV of the Rules of Procedure and

Practice in the Senate When Sitting on Impeachment

Trials, on January 6, 1999, the Senate notified William

H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the United States, of the

time and place fixed for consideration of the articles of

impeachment against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, and requested him to attend;
2

SRES 37 ATS

Whereas, in the intervening days since January 7, 1999,

Chief Justice Rehnquist has presided over the Senate,

when sitting on the trial of the articles of impeachment,

for long hours over many days;

Whereas Chief Justice Rehnquist, in presiding over the Senate, has exhibited extraordinary qualities of fairness, patience, equanimity, and wisdom;

Whereas, by his manner of presiding over the Senate, Chief

Justice Rehnquist has contributed greatly to the Senate’s

conduct of fair, impartial, and dignified proceedings in

the trial of the articles of impeachment; and

Whereas the Senate and the Nation are indebted to Chief

Justice Rehnquist for his distinguished and valued service in fulfilling his constitutional duty to preside over the

Senate in the trial of the articles of impeachment: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate expresses its profound

2 gratitude to William H. Rehnquist, Chief Justice of the

3 United States, for his distinguished service in presiding

4 over the Senate, while sitting on the trial of the articles

5 of impeachment against William Jefferson Clinton, Presi6 dent of the United States.

7 SEC. 2. The Secretary shall notify the Chief Justice

8 of the United States of this resolution.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 248 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 248

   To designate the week of May 7, 2000, as ``National Correctional 
                     Officers and Employees Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2000

Mr. Robb submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To designate the week of May 7, 2000, as ``National Correctional 
                     Officers and Employees Week''.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a crucial component 
        of our criminal justice system;
Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting the rights of the 
        public to be safeguarded from criminal activity;
Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care, custody, and 
        dignity of the human beings charged to their care; and
Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face 
        danger in their daily work lives: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of May 7, 2000, as 
``National Correctional Officers and Employees Week''. The President is 
authorized and requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the 
people of the United States to observe such week with appropriate 
ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented.

 

 

 

| /s/ Thomas W. Winfree | Date  May 14, 2009 |
|-----------------------|--------------------|

| Thomas W. Winfree |
|-------------------|

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

| /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. | Date  May 14, 2009 |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|

| C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. |
|---------------------------|

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6593

JUNE DALE NORRIS BLEDSOE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-42-5) Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. June Dale Norris Bledsoe, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: June Dale Norris Bledsoe appeals the district court’s order denying her petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bledsoe , No. CR-90-42-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### William David CARROLL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BQ-337.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 12, 1987.

*780Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

ZEHMER, Judge.

William David Carroll appeals his conviction of second degree murder, contending the trial court reversibly erred in responding to a question from the jury after commencement of deliberations without first consulting Carroll’s counsel. The parties have stipulated that during jury deliberations a juror asked the bailiff for instructions regarding the maximum sentences imposable on the basic and lesser charges. The bailiff conveyed this request to the trial judge, who, after conferring with the assistant state attorney, declined to give such instruction. The bailiff then communicated such denial to the jury. Neither defense counsel nor defendant was told of the request or the denial. Applying the rationale of the supreme court’s decision in *Bradley v. State,*513 So.2d 112 (Fla.1987), we hold that the trial court, in effect, gave the jury an instruction without complying with rule 3.410, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. The judgment is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded for new trial.

SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
# Nutrient Pollution

and the 2012 Farm Bill Are There Opportunities To Do Better?

# Why Care About Nutrients

in our Waters Public Health Impacts: Drinking Water Supplies Public Health Impacts: Recreational Contact Ecological Impacts: Coastal Water Quality and Aquatic Species Economic Impacts: Beach closures, loss of commercial and recreational fishing opportunities

# Why Care About Nutrients

in our Waters

USGS Circular 1350, 2010

# Sources of Nutrients

USGS Circular 1350, 2010

# Sources of Nutrients

USGS Circular 1350, 2010

# Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP)

CEAP UMRB Report, June 2010

# CEAP: Upper Mississippi River Basin(UMRB) Assessment of the Effects of Conservation Practices on Cultivated Cropland in the UMRB :

- Complete and consistent use of nutrient management (rate, form, timing, and method) is generally lacking

- Treatment of erosion alone can exacerbate nitrogen leaching problem

- Good nitrogen management practices are in use on only about 14% of the acres each year

# CEAP: Upper Mississippi

River Basin

• Land in long - term conserving cover: total nitrogen loss has been reduced by 81%, total phosphorus by 97%; • Phosphorus reductions of 49% • Models: 36 million acres under - treated with erosion and nutrient control:

– 43% total nitrogen reduction

– 51 % total phosphorus reduction CEAP UMRB Report, June 2010

# 2012 Farm Bill Focus on Nutrients
• Prioritize nutrient control in nutrient - impaired watersheds • Incorporate conservation compliance measures for better nutrient control as was done with highly erodible lands and wetlands • Better monitoring data

# Survey of Americans

• Some people believe that farmers willing to use university - tested practices to protect water and air from pollution should receive more federal payments than farmers who refuse to do so.... Do you favor more federal payments to farmers using anti pollution practices?

- 58% support

• Do you approve or disapprove of the condition that farmers receiving federal payments should adopt university - tested practices to prevent pollution of streams or other bodies of water?

- 88% Approve

## Contact information:

Patricia Sinicropi Director, Legislative Affairs National Association of Clean Water Agencies www.nacwa.org psinicropi@nacwa.org 202-833-2672
M E M O R A N D U M

To: File

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: May 30, 2013

Concerning: EPA Proposed Rule to Approve S outh Coast Contingency Measure SIP Revision,

Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

In order to confirm that the reasonable further progress ( RFP ) numbers in the South Coast

Contingency Measure SIP revision are consistent with the 2012 AQMP, we compared 2008 and

2012 PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor emissions data from the Final 2012 Air Quality Management

Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District , December 2012 (submitted February 13,

2013) (“2012 AQMP”) to information provided in the South Coast Air Quality Management

District Proposed Contingency Measures for the 2007 PM2.5 SIP , October 2011 ( submitted

November 14, 2011 ) (“Contingency Measure SIP Revision”) The analysis confirms that the data

from the Contingency Measure SIP Revision are consistent with the data in the 2012 AQMP.

Pollutant 2008 (data from 2012

AQMP) 1 2012 (data from

Contingenc y Measure

SIP revision) 2014 (data from 2012

AQMP) 2

NOx 757 543 506

VOC 593 479 451

PM2.5 80 72 70

SOx 54 20 18

1 Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District , December 2012,

Appendix III, Table A

- 1.

2 Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District , December 2012,

Appendix III, Table A

- 2.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the 

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND 

* Court of Appeals 

* of Maryland 

 v. 

* Misc. Docket AG No. 58, 

 

ELIZABETH MARGARET FISCHER * September Term, 2017 

 O R D E R 

The Court having considered the petition for disciplinary or 

remedial action filed in the above entitled matter in accordance 

with Md. Rule 19-737, the response to the show cause order filed 

by Bar Counsel and there being no response filed by the Respondent, 

it is this 22nd day of March, 2018 

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the 

petition be, and it is hereby granted, and Elizabeth Margaret 

Fischer is disbarred, effective immediately, from the practice of 

law in this State subject to further order of this Court; and it 

is further 

 ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall forthwith strike 

the name of Elizabeth Margaret Fischer from the register of 

attorneys in this Court and shall certify that fact to the Trustees 

of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial 

tribunals in the State in accordance with Rule 19-761. 

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera 

 Chief Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 1 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 1

 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 6, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Informing the House of Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is 
                               assembled.

    Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of Representatives 
that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the Senate is ready 
to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
#### Charles Dale GIDDINGS v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 89-C-0654.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied May 19, 1989.

In re Giddings, Charles Dale; Giddings, Charles Albert; Harris, Linda Giddings;— Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19862-CA; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 43893.

Prior report: La.App., 539 So.2d 66.

Denied.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, David J. Keefe, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 30, 2005



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|    |  | David J. Keefe                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-199-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Thomas W. Winfree, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 12, 2006

By: /s/ Thomas W. Winfree

Thomas W. Winfree

President and

Chief Executive Officer