alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis 

ERIC HUNK WING YIP 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION* 

v. Record No. 1159-04-4 PER CURIAM 

 NOVEMBER 16, 2004 

JANET YIP 

 FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY 

Leslie M. Alden, Judge 

 (Eric Hunk Wing Yip, pro se, on brief). 

 (Jennifer E. Mandell, on brief), for appellee. 

 Eric Hunk Wing Yip, husband, appeals a final order of the trial court granting Janet Yip, 

wife, a divorce. On appeal, husband asserts: (1) he was not allowed to speak during wife’s 

deposition; (2) his attorney would not allow him to offer certain evidence to prove damage to the 

marriage; (3) he was not allowed to offer evidence that wife manipulated particular investment 

accounts; and (4) a handwritten Memorandum of Understanding of Settlement between the parties 

was altered after he signed the document. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we 

conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the 

trial court. See Rule 5A:27. 

 Many of appellant’s citations to the record are inadequate for us to determine where the 

questions presented were preserved in the trial court. See Rule 5A:20(c). In addition, appellant 

cites no principles of law or legal authorities relating to the questions presented. Rule 5A:20(e) 

requires that the appellant’s opening brief include the “principles of law, the argument, and the 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

authorities relating to each question presented.” Appellant’s opening brief does not meet the 

requirements of Rule 5A:20. 

 As we noted in Buchanan v. Buchanan, 14 Va. App. 53, 56, 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992), 

“[s]tatements unsupported by argument, authority, or citations to the record do not merit appellate 

consideration. We will not search the record for errors in order to interpret the appellant’s 

contention and correct deficiencies in a brief.” See also Theismann v. Theismann, 22 Va. App. 557, 

572, 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument on appeal that was inadequately 

developed in appellant’s brief), aff’d en banc, 23 Va. App. 697, 479 S.E.2d 534 (1996); Fitzgerald 

v. Bass, 6 Va. App. 38, 56 n. 7, 366 S.E.2d 615, 625 n. 7 (1988) (en banc) (noting it is not this 

Court’s “function to comb through the record . . . in order to ferret-out for ourselves the validity of 

[appellant’s] claims”). 

 Hence, we find appellant’s questions presented do not warrant appellate consideration, and 

we, therefore, do not consider them on appeal. 

 Wife requests attorney’s fees and costs incurred in defense of this appeal. Upon 

consideration of the entire record in this case, we hold that wife is entitled to a reasonable amount of 

attorney’s fees and costs. See O’Loughlin v. O’Loughlin, 23 Va. App. 690, 695, 479 S.E.2d 98, 

100 (1996). Accordingly, we remand the matter to the trial court for it to determine the proper 

amount of the award. 

 Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the trial court. 

 Affirmed and remanded.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00906

- CV

AMERICAN ASSURANCE COMPANY

,

Appellant

v.

Noela DE LOS SANTOS, Individually and as n ext friend of Kimberly A. Ruiz,

Appellee s

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 06

- 11

- 45222

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

The panel has considered the App ellee ’s Motion for Rehearing, and the m otion is

DENIED.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Thomas W. Winfree, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Community Financial Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 13, 2005

By:   /s/ Thomas W. Winfree

Thomas W. Winfree

President and

Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert L. MILHOUSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BS-495.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 1988.

*381Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Appellant raises two issues on appeal, only one of which has merit. Appellant was charged below with several offenses of possession of cannabis with intent to sell, and either felony or misdemeanor possession of the same cannabis. We agree with appellant that the separate convictions in these cases cannot stand under double jeopardy principles and that the convictions for possession of marijuana in each case must be vacated. *C.P. v. State,*505 So.2d 616 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987); *accord M.S. v. State,*513 So.2d 231 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987).

Appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court in failing to entertain appellant’s motion to suppress during the trial. *Savoie v. State,*422 So.2d 308 (Fla.1982); *see also Davis v. State,*226 So.2d 257 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1969), cited with approval in *Savoie.*

REVERSED and REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Leonard A. Foxman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Eagle Test Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SECRelease No. 34-47986];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 7, 2007       /s/ Leonard A. Foxman Leonard A. Foxman    *Chief Executive Officer and President*
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Andre' DiMino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented.

Date:  January 27, 2006               /s/ Andre' DiMino
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and will be retained by ADM Tronics
Unlimited, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

76) IV-E-70 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM Sheet 76 of 117 
P.2 

September 23, 1998 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

September 2. 1998 Telephone conversation with David Hawkins on the July 24, 

1998 Notice of Availability for Comment Concerning Issues on the Actual-to 

Future Actual Test and Adjustments to Plantwide Applicability Limits. 

Dennis Crumpler, NSR Reform Team Leader 

Integrated Implementation group, ITPID (MD-12) 

TO: Air Docket A-90-37 

Participants: 

David Hawkins 

U.S. EPA 

Lydia Wegman, 

Tom Curran 

Lea Anderson 

Karen Blanchard 

Dennis Crumpler 

Jocelyn deGrandpre 

Jon Devine 

Greg Foote 

Mike Sewell 

David Solomon 

Anna Marie Wood 

Natural Resour 

OAQPS 

OAQPS/ITPID 

OGC 

OAQPS/IIG 

OAQPS/IIG 

OGC 

OGC 

OGC 

OAQPS/IIG 

OAQPS/IIG 

OPAR 

r 

This conference call was initiated by EPA because David Hawkins was unable to attend 

the September 3, 1998 meeting of litigants with regard to two rules revisions—one promulgated 

in 1980 (CMA exhibit B) and the other in 1992 (WEPCO)-under appeal to the First Circuit 

Court of Appeals. The litigations were merged by the Court in 1998 after industry plaintiffs ask 

the court to reactivate the litigations. In subsequent settlement negotiations the litigants agreed 

to meet three times over the fall of 1998 to discuss how the New Source Review Reform 

rulemaking might address the provisions under litigation. The first was to be on September 3, 

1998. As a result of his foreknown absence Mr. Hawkins was asked to provide his feedback on 

EPA's July 24, 1998 Notice of Availability for Comment Concerning Issues on the Actual-toFuture-Actual Test and Adjustments to Plantwide Applicability Limits. 

Mr. Hawkins strongly supported the replacement of the 1992 WEPCO rule.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q as
of March 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000846919
<NAME> ESSEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,064
<INVENTORY>                                    187,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               367,040
<PP&E>                                         359,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                  91,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 775,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,223
<BONDS>                                        422,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              336
<PREFERRED>                                     50,906
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   775,182
<SALES>                                        308,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               308,688
<CGS>                                          258,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,480
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,390
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,390
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D.Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D.Chief Executive Officer and President/s/ JOSEPH A. CALOJoseph A. CaloActing Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


August 14,
2009

This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of
1933.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock
Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chien Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 
 
  Date: September
14, 2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ Chien
Chih Liu
 By: Chien
Chih Liu, Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Thomas W. Winfree, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2005;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  August 12, 2005

By: /s/ Thomas W. Winfree

Thomas W. Winfree

President and

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 20 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 20

 To rename the Committee on Labor and Human Resources the Committee on 
                Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

  Mr. Jeffords (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To rename the Committee on Labor and Human Resources the Committee on 
                Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

    Resolved,
            The Committee on Labor and Human Resources is hereby 
        redesignated as the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and 
        Pensions.
                                 <all>
```