alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 231 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 231

Referring S. 1456 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta 
 of Fort Lauderdale, Florida'' to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 1999

 Mr. Graham submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

            October 24 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Referring S. 1456 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta 
 of Fort Lauderdale, Florida'' to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    S. 1456 entitled ``A bill for the relief of Rocco A. Trecosta of 
Fort Lauderdale, Florida'' now pending in the Senate, together with all 
the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief judge of the United 
States Court of Federal Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDING AND REPORT.

    The chief judge shall--
            (1) proceed according to the provisions of sections 1492 
        and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; and
            (2) report back to the Senate, at the earliest practicable 
        date, providing--
                    (A) such findings of fact and conclusions that are 
                sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature, 
                extent, and character of the claim for compensation 
                referred to in such bill as a legal or equitable claim 
                against the United States or a gratuity; and
                    (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due 
                from the United States to Rocco A. Trecosta of Fort 
                Lauderdale, Florida.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-50839 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NATHANIEL MCCLAINE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-94-CR-157-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Nathaniel McClaine appeals the district court’s amended

criminal judgment following resentencing for possession with

intent to distribute cocaine base within 1,000 feet of a school. 

McClaine was resentenced after his conviction for using or

carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking

offense was vacated under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of Bailey v.

United States, 516 U.S. 137, 144-45 (1995). 

The PSR and the testimony at trial established that law 
No. 98-50839

-2-

enforcement officers found McClaine sleeping on a couch in the

living room, found a loaded .22 caliber pistol in plain view on

the armrest of the same couch, and found cocaine base and cash in

the apartment in close proximity to the weapon. The district

court did not err by increasing McClaine’s base offense level two

levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a

weapon. See United States v. Hare, 150 F.3d 419, 425 (5th Cir.

1998). 

McClaine’s total original sentence was greater than

McClaine’s total sentence after resentencing. Under the

aggregate approach, McClaine’s new sentence is not considered

more severe; his argument that his new sentence is vindictive is

without merit. See United States v. Campbell, 106 F.3d 64, 66

(5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Thomas T. Higgins, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeuroMetrix, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: November 9, 2010

/s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS Thomas T. Higgins Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


---



QuickLinks
**EPA ICR No. 0575.13; OMB Control No. 2070**
**- 0004** 

**ATTACHMENT 1 Toxic Substances Control Act Section 8(d)** 

**15 U.S.C. 2607(d)**U.S. Code

Sec. 2607. Reporting and retention of information * * * (d) Health and safety

studies The Administrator shall promulgate rules under which the Administrator shall require any person who manufactures, processes, or distributes in commerce or who proposes to manufacture, process, or distribute in commerce any ch emical substance or mixture (or with respect to paragraph (2), an y person who has possession of a study) to submit to the Administrator

-- (1) lists of health and safety studies (A) conducted or initiated by or for such person with respect to such substance or mixture at any time, (B) known to such person, or (C) reasonably ascertainable b y such person, except that the Administrator may

exclude certain ty

pes or categories of studies from the requirements of this subsection if the Administrator finds that sub mission of lists of such studies are unnecessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter; and (2) copies of an y stud y contained on a list submitted pursuant to paragraph (1) or otherwise known b y such person.
Continuing Abatement Order filed November 21, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00009-CR

NO. 14-18-00010-CR

NO. 14-18-00021-CR

____________

STEVEN KURT BAUGHMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1423421

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On July 25, 2019, this court directed the trial court to conduct a hearing in 

this case to determine whether appellant needed appointment of new counsel. Our 

order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing is made, make 

findings of fact and conclusions of law, and order the trial clerk to forward a record 

of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and 
conclusions. On September 19, 2019, we received the record of that hearing. On 

November 19, 2019, we received the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions 

on law wherein it stated it would appoint counsel for appellant. 

We now ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel for appellant and 

file that order with this court. A supplemental clerk’s record with an order 

appointing counsel shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 15 days of the 

date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
#### William BARNES v. WALL SHIPYARD et al.

No. 86-C-2426.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Barnes, William; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-303; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 216932.

Prior report: La.App., 498 So.2d 74.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.
Order entered December 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00930

- CR

ALICE ANNETTE STEELE , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F08

- 45120

- M



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Belinda Baraka’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record to the extent that we ORDER Ms. Baraka to file the record within
THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
The clerk’s record is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file the clerk’s record in this appeal by DECEMBER 23, 2013

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Belinda Baraka, official cou rt reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Charys Holding Company, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Billy V. Ray, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: September 6, 2005

                                      /s/ Billy V. Ray, Jr.
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Billy V. Ray, Jr., Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
#### Schubauer Unemployment Compensation Case.

*601Argued March 12, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Claire E. Schubauer,*appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

April 12, 1962:

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

In this unemployment compensation case, the appellant was denied benefits on the ground that she refused suitable work without good cause.

The board found that she had been employed as a doctor’s receptionist and had a valid separation when she left because of pregnancy. She was advised she could return to her employment after the child was born. When her employer learned that she had applied for unemployment compensation benefits, he wrote her to return to her former position. The board found that she “advised him that she was unable to return to work because she was required to remain at home to care for her children.”

The evidence supports the findings of the board. She is disqualified under §402(a) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P.S. §802(a) because she refused suitable work without good cause. *Buchko Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 559, 175 A. 2d 914 (1961).

Decision affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of QC Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don Early, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 7, 2008



/s/ Don EarlyDon EarlyChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer




Page 41
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

45) ll-K-(B)-33 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:49 AM Sheet 45 of 325 
P.2 

/fl\ „ P. ?n\D

(0)fOJ^ 

II-K-(B)-33 

SUPPORT TO THE INDUSTRIAL BOILER NSPS ACTIVITY - IFCAM 

COMPUTER MODEL. 

Letter from J.D. Mobley, EPArlERL to D.B. Henschel & 

W.J. Rhodes, EPArlERL. 

April 10, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-33
**Exhibit
23.2**
 
 **CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 Nos. (333-86761, 333-88881, 333-08483, 333-08477, 333-81646) of Acceris
Communications Inc. of our report dated April 14, 2004, except for note 3, which
appears in the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form
10-K Amendment No. 1 for the year then ended December 31, 2003 and is not
presented herein, as to which the date is September 28, 2004, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
 San
Diego, California
 March 28,
2005
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MARCH 2, 2021

NO. 03-20-00563-CV

C. A. C., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 3, 2020. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6723

WILLIAM H. GALVIN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PERRYVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT; OFFICER RICHIE HUFFSTUTLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:21-cv-01754-SAG)

Submitted: October 26, 2022 Decided: November 23, 2022

Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William H. Galvin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6723 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

William H. Galvin, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Galvin v. Perryville 

Police Dep’t, No. 1:21-cv-01754-SAG (D. Md. May 11, 2022). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6723 Doc: 11 Filed: 11/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 21**

** **

**Subsidiaries of Plum Creek TimberCompany, Inc.**

 

Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P.

Plum Creek Timber I, L.L.C.

Plum Creek Timber II, L.L.C.

Plum Creek Manufacturing, L.P.

Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, L.L.C.

Plum Creek Southern Timber, L.L.C.

Plum Creek South Central Timberlands, L.L.C.

Plum Creek Manufacturing Holding Company, Inc.

Plum Creek Marketing, Inc.

Plum Creek Northwest Lumber, Inc.

Plum Creek Northwest Plywood, Inc.

Plum Creek MDF, Inc.

Plum Creek Southern Lumber, Inc.

PC Timberland Investment Company

Plum Creek Investment Company

Plum Creek Land Company

Plum Creek Maine Marketing, Inc.

Highland Resources Inc.

Cypress Creek Ranch, L.L.C.

B & C Water Resources, Inc.

B & C Water Resources, L.L.C.

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8158** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. MARCUS D. DUKES , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , District Judge. ( 8:03

- cr - 00133

- RWT

- 1 ; 8:09

- cv - 00135

- RWT )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un publishe d per curiam opinion
. Marcus D. Dukes, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan E. Foreman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marcus D. Dukes seeks to ap peal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 20 10 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appea lability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurist s would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record

a nd conclude that Dukes has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 bef ore the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         104,280
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  230,080
<ALLOWANCES>                                   9,879
<INVENTORY>                                    8,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               375,433
<PP&E>                                         1,528,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                 292,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,733,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          332,991
<BONDS>                                        1,356,127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       902
<OTHER-SE>                                     791,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,733,927
<SALES>                                        983,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               983,964
<CGS>                                          572,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  572,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,893
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             85,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                81,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                   26,293
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            54,882
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                53,205
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,677
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.14



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 21 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 21

Congratulating the University of Tennessee Volunteers football team on 
winning the 1998 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I-A 
                         football championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

   Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Thompson) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the University of Tennessee Volunteers football team on 
winning the 1998 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I-A 
                         football championship.

Whereas the University of Tennessee Volunteers football team (referred to in 
        this resolution as the ``Tennessee Volunteers'') defeated the Florida 
        State University Seminoles on January 4, 1999, at the Fiesta Bowl in 
        Tempe, Arizona, to win the National Collegiate Athletic Association 
        Division I-A football championship;
Whereas the Tennessee Volunteers completed the 1998 football season with a 
        perfect record of 13 wins and 0 losses;
Whereas the Tennessee Volunteers defeated the Mississippi State University 
        Bulldogs to claim the 1998 Southeastern Conference football 
        championship;
Whereas the Tennessee Volunteers' Coach Phillip Fulmer, his staff, and his 
        players displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, selflessness, and 
        sportsmanship throughout the course of the season to achieve collegiate 
        football's highest honor; and
Whereas the Tennessee Volunteers have brought pride and honor to Tennessee: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates the University of Tennessee Volunteers 
        football team on winning the 1998 National Collegiate Athletic 
        Association Division I-A football championship; and
            (2) commends the University of Tennessee Volunteers 
        football team for its pursuit of athletic excellence and its 
        outstanding accomplishment in collegiate football in winning 
        the championship.
                                 <all>
```