alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 8, 2015

Mr. Mervin Goulette

405 Juliette Circle

Brunswick, GA 31525

Dear Mr. Goulette:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 29th 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

2633), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELISHA WILLIAM POLLOCK,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 11-10667

D. C. No. 4:10-cr-01786-CKJDTF-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 14, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and MARBLEY, District

Judge.

** 

 Defendant appeals the sentence imposed by the district court for his

conviction for making a false statement during the purchase of a firearm. 18

U.S.C. § 924(a)(1)(A). The district court applied a six-level enhancement to

FILED

SEP 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as

provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
Defendant’s base offense level for Defendant’s previous conviction for a felony

crime of violence. Defendant argues the district court erred in applying the

enhancement because the offense for which he was previously convicted, seconddegree burglary under Arizona law, is not a “crime of violence” under the residual

clause of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2). We review de novo a district court’s

interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Lopez-Patino, 391

F.3d 1034, 1036 (9th Cir. 2004) (per curiam).

Defendant’s argument is stymied by this court’s decisions in United States v.

Park, 649 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir. 2011), and United States v. Terrell, 593 F.3d 1084

(9th Cir. 2010). In Terrell, we held that second-degree burglary under Arizona law

is categorically a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984

(the “ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). 593 F.3d at 1093. Furthermore, this Court has

interpreted the term “crime of violence” under the residual clause of U.S.S.G.

§ 4B1.2(a)(2) in a manner consistent with our interpretation of “violent felony”

under the ACCA. See Park, 649 F.3d at 1177. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the

sentence imposed on Defendant by the district court.

Defendant also contends the residual clause of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a)(2) is

unconstitutionally vague. This Court recently considered and rejected this

argument in United States v. Spencer, No. 12-10078, 2013 WL 3870731 (9th Cir.

2
July 29, 2013), where we found this attack to be foreclosed by Supreme Court and

Ninth Circuit precedent. Id. at *10 (citing Sykes v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2267,

2277 (2011); James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 210 n. 6 (2007); and United

States v. Crews, 621 F.3d 849, 852 n. 4, 855-56 (9th Cir. 2010)). Thus, there is no

basis for reversal on this ground.

AFFIRMED.

3
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17563-17564]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7101]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Low Flow Protection Policy

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As part of its regular business meeting held on March 15, 
2012, in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the Susquehanna River Basin 
Commission (Commission) approved the release of a proposed Low Flow 
Protection Policy (Policy) for public review and comment. The Policy 
can be accessed on the Commission's Web site at http://www.srbc.net/pubinfo/businessmeeting.htm, or by contacting the Commission to receive 
a copy by first-class mail. Persons interested in providing comments 
are directed to submit the same in writing on or before May 16, 2012.

DATES: The deadline for the submission of written comments is May 16, 
2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to: Mr. John Balay, Susquehanna River 
Basin Commission, 1721 N. Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17102-2391, or 
electronically submitted through http://www.srbc.net/pubinfo/businessmeeting.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Balay, Manager of Planning and 
Operations, telephone: (717) 238-0423; fax: (717) 238-2436.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 15, 2012, the Commission approved 
the release of a proposed Low Flow Protection Policy for public review 
and comment. The Policy was developed over the past year in 
coordination with the Commission's Water Resources

[[Page 17564]]

Management Advisory Committee to improve low flow protection standards 
associated with approved water withdrawals. The improvements are 
largely based on scientific advances in ecosystem flow protection. The 
Commission will use the Policy and supporting technical guidance when 
reviewing withdrawal applications to establish limits and conditions on 
approvals consistent with the Commission's regulatory standards (18 CFR 
806.23).

    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR 
parts 806, 807, and 808.

    Dated: March 15, 2012.
Stephanie L. Richardson
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7101 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 Wholly-owned by Ace Cash Express, Inc.:
    
    Check Express, Inc., a Florida corporationQ.C.& G. Financial, Inc., an Arizona corporationAce Payment Services, Inc., a California corporationAce Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyACE Credit Services, LLC, a Texas limited liability companyWholly-owned by Check Express, Inc.:
    
    Check Express Florida, Inc., a Florida corporationCheck Express Finance, Inc., a Florida corporationCheck-X-Change Corporation, a California corporationCheck Express South Carolina, Inc., a Florida corporationCheck Express USA, Inc., a Florida corporation
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Allion Healthcare, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2006, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(i) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allion
Healthcare, Inc.

Dated: April 17, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael P. Moran   
|Michael P. Moran       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ James G. Spencer   
|James G. Spencer       
|Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Michael H. Lee,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Francis M. Colalucci,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Michael H. Lee
-------------------------------------
Michael H. Lee
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 5, 2006




/s/ Francis M. Colalucci
-------------------------------------
Francis M. Colalucci
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

May 5, 2006

                                       24
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven E. Carley, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

/s/ Stephen E. Carley          

Stephen E. Carley

President 

EPL Intermediate, Inc.

May 12, 2006

 

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### STATE ex rel. Secundino CASTANEDA v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-2916.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Castaneda, Secundino; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 811-540.

Denied.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Presidential Documents 18897 

Proclamation 8787 of March 23, 2012 

Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of 

Greek and American Democracy, 2012 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Two hundred and thirty-six years ago, a new American Nation was founded 

on an old Greek principle—democratic rule by a free people. We trace 

this enduring idea to ancient Hellas, where Greeks brought forth the world’s 

first democracy and kindled a philosophical tradition that would stand 

the test of time. Over two millennia later, the Greek people rose up to 

reclaim their heritage as citizens of a sovereign nation. Today, on the 191st 

anniversary of Greece’s independence, we commemorate that struggle to 

restore democracy in its birthplace, renew the bonds that bring our countries 

together, and celebrate the Hellenic ideals that continue to shape the American experience. 

As America’s Founders built a Government of the people, by the people, 

and for the people, they drew inspiration from the democratic pioneers 

who shaped a small group of ancient Greek city states. In the years since, 

Greece and America have strengthened that connection through shared history and deep partnerships between our people. During the American Civil 

War, Greek Americans served and fought to preserve our Union. Through 

two World Wars and a long Cold War, America and Greece stood as allies 

in the pursuit of peace. And for generations, Greek Americans have profoundly enriched our national life. They stand as leaders in every field 

and every part of our society, and their cultural legacy still echoes in 

classrooms, courtrooms, and communities across our Nation. 

On Greek Independence Day, we commemorate the proud traditions that 

tie our nations together and honor all those who trace their lineage to 

the Hellenic Republic. Nearly 200 years after the Greek people won their 

war to return democracy to their homeland and become a sovereign state, 

we reaffirm the warm friendship and solidarity that will guide our work 

together in the years ahead. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 25, 2012, 

as Greek Independence Day: A National Day of Celebration of Greek and 

American Democracy. I call upon all the people of the United States to 

observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PRES DOC
18898 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 28, 2012 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third 

day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysixth. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7640 

Filed 3–27–12; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F2–P 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PRES DOCOB#1.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 19525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7762]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service

7 CFR Part 210

[FNS-2011-0021]
RIN 0584-AE11


National School Lunch Program: School Food Service Account 
Revenue Amendments Related to the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 
2010; Approval of Information Collection Request

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.

ACTION: Interim final rule; approval of information collection request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Nutrition Service published an interim final rule 
entitled ``National School Lunch Program: School Food Service Account 
Revenue Amendments Related to the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 
2010'' on June 17, 2011. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
cleared the associated information collection requirements (ICR) on 
February 6, 2012. This document announces approval of the ICR.

DATES: The ICR associated with the interim rule published in the 
Federal Register on June 17, 2011, at 76 FR 35301, was approved by OMB 
on February 6, 2012, under OMB Control Number 0584-0565.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Rodgers-Kuperman, Chief, Program 
Analysis and Monitoring Branch, Child Nutrition Division, Food and 
Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 640, Alexandria, 
Virginia 22302, (703) 305-2600, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88c4f1e6e6a6dae7efedfafbc8eee6fba6fdfbece9a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8f4c1d6d696ead7dfddcacbf8ded6cb96cdcbdcd996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The June 2011 rule amended National School 
Lunch Program (NSLP) regulations to conform to requirements contained 
in the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-296) 
regarding equity in school lunch pricing and revenue from nonprogram 
foods sold in schools. It requires school food authorities (SFAs) 
participating in the NSLP to provide the same level of financial 
support for lunches served to students who are not eligible for free or 
reduced price lunches as is provided for lunches served to students 
eligible for free lunches, and also that all food sold in a school and 
purchased with funds from the nonprofit school food service account, 
other than meals and supplements reimbursed by the Department of 
Agriculture, must generate revenue at least equal to the cost of such 
foods. The rule too comments on its ICR until August 16, 2011. This 
document announces OMB's approval of the ICR under OMB Control Number 
0584-0565.

    Dated: March 26, 2012.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-7762 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Commonwealth *ex*rel. Bobko, Appellant, *v.*Ceraul.

*71Submitted December 11,1961.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Francis Bobko,*appellant, in propria persona.

*Lawrence J. Briody,*Assistant District Attorney, and *Andrew L. Herster, Jr.,*District Attorney, for appellee.

January 16, 1962:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County is affirmed on the opinion of Judge *72Clinton Budd Palmee for the court below, reported at 25 Pa. D. & C. 2d 751.
#### Christopher MORTIMER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-504.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 18, 1986.

*94Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Eric Wm. Hendon, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee Ruska Pelzman and Nancy Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARK-DULL and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that notations on a guidelines sentencing score sheet will not suffice as a written order stating reasons to enhance a sentence. *State v. Jackson,*478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985), *Reichman v. State,*473 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Rule 3.701(d)(11) Fla.R.Crim.P. Therefore the sentence under review is reversed and the matter is returned to the trial court for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.
NO. 07-03-0127-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 20, 2003

	______________________________

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT

	V.

	KRISTOPHER COX, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 31ST DISTRICT COURT OF GRAY COUNTY;

	NO. 6053; HONORABLE STEVEN R. EMMERT, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, The State of Texas, by and through its District Attorney, Richard J. Roach, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on May 16, 2003, stating that it desires to withdraw its appeal.

	Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal and hereby dismiss the appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.   Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  

							James T. Campbell

						    	        Justice

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Placer del Mar, Ltd.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Humberto
Bravo, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 18, 2011                By: /s/ Humberto Bravo
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Humberto Bravo
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clifton M. DUPONT.

No. 88-KK-0167.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Dupont, Clifton M.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 119896; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW87 1530>

Denied.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00693- CV

In re F rank Joseph

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Fr ank J oseph has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court’s order re l at ed to his reque st for DNA testing was unclea r. See Tex. R. App. P. 52. 1 Having revie wed the pe tition, we deny the petition for wr it of mandamus. See id. R. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Filed: Nove mber 17, 2015

Acc ording to rela tor’s petit ion, the t rial court err oneously chec ked nex t to the “gr anted” 1 box and then c rossed that out and indica ted that the re quest was instea d denied.