alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BEFOR E TH E DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C .

Join t Applicatio n of AMERICA N AIRLINES , INC . BRITIS H AIRWAY S PL C FINNAI R OYJ IBERI ALlNEA S AEREA S D E ESPANA , S.A . ROYA L JORDANIA N AIRLINE S unde r4 9 U.S.C . § § 4130 8 an d 4130 9 fo r approva l ofan d antitrus t immunit yfo r allianc e agreemen t Docke t DOT-OST-2008-025 2

AFFIDAVI TO F VIRGI N ATLANTI C AIRWAY S
I n accordanc e wit h th e Department' s Notic e o fAugus t 19 , 200 8 i n thi s docket , I hereb ycertif ytha tal l copie s o fth e applicants ' confidentia l material s i n th e possessio n of
A Virgi n Atlantic' s affidavi t holder s i n thi s proceedin g have ' bee n destroyed

.

Subscribe d an d syyormto befor e m e thi s (fe da yo fjftJ^j^

2010

.

Publi c M

. Mosne r Hollan d & Knigh t LL P 209 9 Pennsylvani a Avenue , NW , Suit e 10 0 Washington , D C 20006-680 1 202.419.260 4 202.955.556 4 anita.mosner(a)hklaw.co m Attorney s fo rVirgi n Atlanti cAirway s

AID AS

. ORTIZ-OLIVENCI A NOTAR YPUBLI C DISTRIC

TO F COLUMBIA M yCommissio n Expire s Jun e 30,201 3

### CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E

I hereb ycertif ythat I hav

e thi s date serve d th e foregoin g documen t o n th e person s identifie d belo

wb ycausin g a cop

yt o be sen t b

yelectroni cmail

. anbird@fedex.co m andrew.forman@cwt.co m aserranzana@geclaw.co m benjamin.slocum@usairways.co m bill@mietuslaw.co m bkeiner@crowell.co m blabow@omm.co m bob.kneisley@wnco.co m bruce.rabinovitz@wilmerhale.co m byerlyjr@state.go v carl.nelson@aa.com cdonley@ssd.co m cgosain@steptoe.co m cjsimpson@zsrlaw.co m cwilson@omm.co m david.heffernan@wilmerhale.co m dfisher@kelleydrye.co m dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.co m diarmuid.ryan@hammonds.co m dkirstein@yklaw.co m donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.co m dwight.moore@ustranscom.mi l ebailey@wileyrein.co m efaberman@wileyrein.co m gmurphy@crowell.co m howard_kass@usairways.com james.garzia@apgnet.co m jashetaylor@gibsondunn.co m jeff.ogar@aa.co m jeffrey.manley@united.co m jennifer.trock@pillsburylaw.co m jhill@dlalaw.co m jill.ptacek@usdoj.go v jim.ballough@faa.go v jrichardson@johnlrichardson.co m julie.oettinger@united.co m jyoung@yklaw.co m karine.faden@freshfields.co m kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.co m konstantinos.adamantopoulos@hammonds.co m kquinn@pillsburylaw.co m lachter@starpower.ne t leslie.abbott@wnco.co m lhalloway@crowell.co m libowd@sullcrom.co m mamaila@airfrance.f r mchopra@jamhoff.co m mcmillin@woa.co m mgerchick@gerchickmurphy.co m mgoldman@sgbdc.co m mholland@condonlaw.co m mroller@rollerbauer.co m mrosia@crowell.co m msinick@ssd.co m npeterson@wileyrein.co m paul.jasinski@ba.co m paul.yde@freshfields.co m peter.irvine@dot.go v pmurphy@gerchickmurphy.co m pmurphy@lopmurphy.co m prrizzi@hhlaw.co m pruden@asta.or g rbkeiner@crowell.co m rclayman@geclaw.co m recohn@hhlaw.co m rick.rule@cwt.co m robert.land@jetblue.co m rsilverberg@sgbdc.co m russell.bailey@alpa.or g sametta.c.barnett@delta.co m sami.sarelius@finnair.f i sascha.vanderbellen@delta.co m scott.mcclain@delta.co m sllunsford@fedex.co m thomas.bolling@coair.co m tmuris@omm.co m todd.homan@dot.go v wkaras@steptoe.co m



### Soph yChe n Septembe r17 , 201 0
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2611]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-756]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return Processing 
Delays Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return 
Processing Delays Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 7, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-(888) 912-1227 or 
(206) 220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Return Processing 
Delays Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 7, 2012, at 
9:30 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notifications of intent to participate 
must be made with Ms. Janice Spinks. For more information please 
contact Ms. Spinks at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (206) 220-6098, or write TAP 
Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to 
the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2012-756 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
The State of e/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2015

No. 04-15-00207-CR

Jessica G. CASTILLO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 458109

Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In these companion cases, Appellant’s briefs were due on June 17, 2015. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a). We granted Appellant’s first motions for extensions of time to file the briefs

until July 17, 2015. On July 20, 2015, Appellant filed second motions for extension of time to 

file the briefs until August 17, 2015, for a total extension of sixty days. 

Appellant’s motions are GRANTED. Appellant must file the briefs not later than August 

17, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEFS

WILL BE GRANTED. 

If Appellant fails to file the briefs as ordered, we may abate these appeals and remand 

them to the trial court for abandonment hearings. See id. R. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State, 952 

S.W.2d 50, 52–53 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Back to Contents

Exhibit 10.2

|        |  |                                                                                                                                                  |
|--------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |  | **Edificio Caja de Madrid      Avinguda Diagonal, 640      08017 Barcelona      España      Tel. +34 932 532 700      Fax +34 934 059 032** |

 

**CONSENT  OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the inclusion  of our reports dated March 3, 2003, March 7, 2002 and March 1, 2001 relating  to the consolidated financial statements of Gas Natural, S.D.G., S.A. and its  group companies as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the years  in the three year period ended December 31, 2002, in the Annual Report of Repsol  YPF, S.A. on Form 20-F and in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-12254 and  333-10668 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission**.**

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Barcelona, Spain  June 16, 2003 

**PricewaterhouseCoopers  Auditores, S.L. – R.M. Madrid, hoja 87.250-1, folio 75, tomo 9,267, libro  8.054, sección 3a  Inscrita en el R.O.A.C. con el número 80242 – CIF: B-79 031290**

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 288 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 288

  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 12, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United 
                             States Senate.

    Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules for the 
Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United States Capitol (prohibiting 
the taking of pictures in the Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended 
for the sole and specific purpose of permitting the Senate Photographic 
Studio to photograph the United States Senate in actual session on 
Tuesday, June 6, 2000, at the hour of 2:15 p.m.
    Sec. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is authorized and 
directed to make the necessary arrangements therefor, which 
arrangements shall provide for a minimum of disruption to Senate 
proceedings.
                                 <all>
```
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Abu Dhabi Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Berlin Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver

Dubai Dusseldorf Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston London Los Angeles Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New York

Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rome San Francisco Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated

offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 038245/000001 - 3486384 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20004

+1.202.637.5600 Tel

+1.202.637.5910 Fax

Robert E. Cohn

Partner

+1.202.637.4999 Direct Line

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

August 31, 2012

Ms. Lauralyn J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Rhoades Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Transair for a Certificate -

Responses to DOT Information Request of August 23, 2012

(Docket DOT-OST-2011-0216)

Dear Ms. Remo:

Rhoades Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Transair (“Rhoades”) hereby submits the enclosed

responses to the Department’s Information Request dated August 23, 2012. Because

Rhoades’ responses include confidential information, a confidential version is being

submitted under seal, accompanied by a Motion for Confidential Treatment.

Please contact me if the Department requires additional information to advance the

processing of Rhoades’ application.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn

Counsel for Rhoades Aviation, Inc. d/b/a Transair

Enclosures

cc: Reese Davidson

Mary Ballard, POI, Indianapolis FSDO

Teimour Riahi, CEO, Rhoades Aviation, Inc.
#### William D. HUTSON, Jr. v. MADISON PARISH POLICE JURY. Daniel E. MIZE v. MADISON PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 86-C-2349.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Madison Parish Police Jury, applying for reconsideration of writ not considered, December 19, 1986, 498 So.2d 749, of writ of certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 17909-CA, 17910-CA; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 7918, 7919.

Reconsideration granted. The writ is denied.

DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  SUBSIDIARIES



   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
                                 Jurisdiction of
                Corporation                         Incorporation

   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   MinVen Gold (U.S.A.)                  Delaware
   Corporation
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Blackdome Mining Corp.                British Columbia
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Compass Mining, Inc.                  Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Brohm Mining Corp.                    South Dakota
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Matrix Financial Inc.                 Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Helix Mining Inc.                     Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Stibnite Mine Inc.                    Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Barrier Reef Inc.                     Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Dakota Gold Mining Inc.               Delaware
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
   Dakota Merger                         Delaware
   Corporation
   ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
Motion GRANTED and Order filed October 29 , 2015
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 15
- 00698
- CV

____________ IN RE JENNIFER BRADE N , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 328th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14
- DCV
- 216657



### ORDER
On August 19, 2015 , relator Jennifer Braden filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Ronald Pope , Judge of the 328th District Court, in Fort Bend County, Texas, to set aside his amended order of enforcement by contempt and suspension of commitment dated February 27, 2015 , in trial court numbe r 14

- DCV

- 216657, styled In theInterest of I.R.B., a Child

. Relator claims respondent abused his discretion by finding her in contempt

. Relator also filed a motion for temporary stay of the proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. R elator ask s this court to stay the amended order of enforcement by contempt and suspension of commitment dated February 27, 2015 , and any proceedings related to its enforcement pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. It appears from the facts sta ted in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue the following order:
We ORDER the amended order of enforcement by contempt and suspension of commitment dated February 27, 2015, and any proceedings related to its enforcement in trial court cause number 14

- DCV

- 216657 , In the Interest of I.R.B., a Child , STAYED until a final decision b y this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or unt il further order of this court.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Brown.
# Jurnalul Oficial C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 138I |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 6328 aprilie 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 138I

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 6328 aprilie 2020

---

| Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informări |
| | INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE |
| | Comisia Europeană |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Regulamentul (UE) 2020/560 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentelor (UE) nr. 508/2014 și (UE) nr. 1379/2013 în ceea ce privește măsurile specifice de atenuare a impactului epidemiei de COVID-19 în sectorul pescuitului și acvaculturii | 1 |

Cuprins

Pagina

IV   Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

2020/C 138 I/01

Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Regulamentul (UE) 2020/560 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentelor (UE) nr. 508/2014 și (UE) nr. 1379/2013 în ceea ce privește măsurile specifice de atenuare a impactului epidemiei de COVID-19 în sectorul pescuitului și acvaculturii

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

IV Informări

INFORMĂRI PROVENIND DE LA INSTITUȚIILE, ORGANELE ȘI ORGANISMELE UNIUNII EUROPENE

Comisia Europeană

| 28.4.2020 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

CI 138/1

---

Declarația Comisiei referitoare la Regulamentul (UE) 2020/560 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului de modificare a Regulamentelor (UE) nr. 508/2014 și (UE) nr. 1379/2013 în ceea ce privește măsurile specifice de atenuare a impactului epidemiei de COVID-19 în sectorul pescuitului și acvaculturii

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Comisia salută adoptarea rapidă de către Parlamentul European și Consiliu a propunerii sale de modificare a Fondului european pentru pescuit și afaceri maritime pentru a atenua impactul epidemiei de COVID-19 și a veni în sprijinul pescarilor și producătorilor noștri din acvacultură.

Comisia dorește să sublinieze importanța majoră pe care o au controlul pescuitului și colectarea de date științifice pentru gestionarea durabilă a stocurilor de pește bazată pe cele mai bune avize științifice disponibile și pe o punere în aplicare fiabilă. Reducerea resurselor financiare aferente nu trebuie să conducă la deteriorarea rezultatelor acestor elemente esențiale ale politicii comune în domeniul pescuitului.

Comisia dorește să sublinieze că propunerea sa, precum și modificările aduse acesteia, abordează această situație unică de criză cauzată de epidemia de COVID-19 și nevoia excepțională și imediată de sprijin pentru a putea face față consecințelor acestei epidemii. Modificările nu pot aduce atingere viitorului regulament privind Fondul european pentru pescuit și afaceri maritime.

---
#### FRONTIER MATERIALS, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF BOULDER, a municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 83CA0180.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

May 5, 1983.

*1066French & Stone, Joseph C. French, Boulder, for plaintiff-appellee.

Joseph N. de Raismes, Boulder City Atty., Ruthanne Gartland, Asst. City Atty., Boulder, for defendant-appellant.

*

 Retired Court of Appeals Judge sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice under provisions of the *Colo. Const,*Art. VI, Sec. 5(3), and § 24-51-607(5), C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.)

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff initiated this action in the trial court pursuant to provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act of 1975, § 13-22-201, et seq., C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.) (the Act), seeking an order to compel defendant to submit certain claims under dispute to arbitration. The trial court ordered arbitration, and defendant commenced this appeal.

This court issued an order to show cause why the appeal herein should not be dismissed for lack of a final appealable order. Upon consideration of defendant’s response to the show cause order, and for the reasons set out below, we conclude that this appeal is premature and that the order from which this appeal is taken is not final. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

Section 13-22-204, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum. Supp.) provides in part that a party to an arbitration agreement may apply for an order to compel another party to arbitrate. Section 13-22-221, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum. Supp.), entitled “Appeals,” specifies those orders from which an appeal may be taken under the Act. Conspicuously absent from that list is an order by the court compelling the parties to arbitrate. Defendant does not cite, and we are not aware of, any authority which would support the view that such an order is a final appealable order. *Cf. Sandefer v. District Court,*635 P.2d 547 (1981) (order compelling arbitration reviewed in Supreme Court by writ of mandamus).

The appeal is dismissed without prejudice.

PIERCE and SILVERSTEIN,*, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 85

Supporting the efforts of the people of Indonesia in achieving a transition

to genuine democracy, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 1999

Mr. TORRICELLI (for himself, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. REED, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. COVERDELL, and Mr. KERRY) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Supporting the efforts of the people of Indonesia in achieving

a transition to genuine democracy, and for other purposes.

Whereas Indonesia is the world’s fourth most populous country, has the world’s largest Muslim population, and has

developed friendly relations with the United States;

Whereas a stable and democratic Indonesia is important to

overall security in Southeast Asia;

Whereas President Suharto resigned on May 21, 1998, in accordance with Indonesia’s constitutional processes;

Whereas incidents of ethnic and religious violence have become more prevalent in the months following President

Suharto’s resignation and threaten to undermine Indonesia’s delicate political balance;
2

•SRES 85 IS

Whereas President Habibie has indicated his willingness to

consider granting independence to East Timor, if the

people of East Timor reject a plan for greater autonomy

within Indonesia;

Whereas Indonesia is pursuing a transition to genuine democracy, establishing a new governmental structure, and developing a new political order;

Whereas President Habibie signed several bills governing

elections, political parties, and the structure of legislative

bodies into law on February 1, 1999; and

Whereas free, fair, and transparent elections to the House of

Representatives of Indonesia (DPR), now scheduled for

June 7, 1999, will help the people of Indonesia continue

their democratic transition: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) supports the Indonesian people in their ef3 forts to carry out the provisions of the new election

4 laws and hold democratic elections as scheduled;

5 (2) calls upon the Government of Indonesia to

6 take all steps necessary to ensure that the elections

7 scheduled for June 7, 1999, are free, fair, and

8 transparent;

9 (3) urges all political, military, and ethnic lead10 ers to refrain from all violence and work toward a

11 peaceful political campaign period;

12 (4) calls upon all Indonesian leaders, political

13 party members, military personnel, and the general
3

•SRES 85 IS

1 public to respect and uphold the results of all elec2 tions held in a free and fair manner;

3 (5) urges all candidates for political office to

4 address the ethnic and religious tensions in Indo5 nesia that have surfaced since President Suharto’s

6 resignation and incorporate possible solutions into

7 their election platforms; and

8 (6) calls upon the Government of Indonesia and

9 all prospective officeholders to work with the people

10 of East Timor to achieve an equitable and realistic

11 solution to the question of East Timor’s future polit12 ical status.

Æ