alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 361

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate Rules and

Manual.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of a revised edition of the Senate

Rules and Manual.

1 Resolved, That (a) the Committee on Rules and Ad2 ministration shall prepare a revised edition of the Senate

3 Rules and Manual for the use of the 106th Congress.

4 (b) The manual shall be printed as a Senate docu5 ment.

6 (c) In addition to the usual number of documents,

7 1,400 additional copies of the manual shall be bound of

8 which—

9 (1) 500 paperbound copies shall be for the use

10 of the Senate; and
2

•SRES 361 IS

1 (2) 900 copies shall be bound (500 paperbound;

2 200 nontabbed black skiver; 200 tabbed black skiv3 er) and delivered as may be directed by the Com4 mittee on Rules and Administration.

Æ
#### Andrew HAMORI, Appellant, v. Mary HAMORI, Appellee.

No. 85-1178.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 11, 1986.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1986.

*148Eugene M. Underberg, Lake Worth, for appellant.

J. Steven Reynolds of M. Lee Thompson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After tracing the source of the cash, which created the divorcing parties' small estate ($16,000 came from the wife and $3,000 from the husband), we can find no abuse of discretion in the trial judge’s decision to distribute the husband’s undivided half interest in their modest home, to the wife. However, we find it reversible error to further require him to pay the $7,500 second mortgage on that home, which obligation should become the wife’s sole responsibility under the facts of this case.

In all other respects, the cause is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART.

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
#### James William ATKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-1052.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 21, 1988.

James William Atkins, in pro. per.

Robert Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Wilkinson v. State,*504 So.2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); *compare Thornton v. State,*354 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Thomas P. Russo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
(Amendment No. 1) for the period ended June 30, 2006 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

                                   By: /s/ THOMAS P. RUSSO
              ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Thomas P. Russo
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                       METAMORPHIX, INC.

Date:  December 15, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from form 10 KSB
for the year ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          38,898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  176,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                    37,031
<INVENTORY>                                     19,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               198,685
<PP&E>                                         245,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                 163,635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,777,890
<BONDS>                                        400,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              454
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,358
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,555,552)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   689,242
<SALES>                                        854,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               854,258
<CGS>                                          129,882
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  495,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,917,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,477,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,477,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,477,733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.23)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trust (the Trust)
and Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David Mitchell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Trust and the Company. /s/ David MitchellDavid MitchellChief Financial OfficerMay 16, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1








I, Susan B. Sheffield, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2021-2  (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);





2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and





5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Citibank, N.A.








By:/s/ Susan B. SheffieldName:Susan B. SheffieldTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:March 3, 2023
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on April 12, 
2012 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. at the Washington State Parks office, 270 
9th Street NE., East Wenatchee, WA. During this meeting information 
will be shared about the Forest Service Chief's 10-Year Stewardship 
Challenge, Upper Yakima Basin Water Enhancement Project, Holden Mine 
Remediation progress, and an update on the Forest Plan Revision. All 
Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Clint Kyhl, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 
98801, phone 509-664-9200.

     Dated: March 21, 2012.
Clinton Kyhl,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2012-7368 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
#### William Stanley HOGGART, Appellant/Petitioner, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, Appellee/Respondent.

Nos. BL-281, BK-202.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 15, 1986.

Rehearing Granted June 27, 1986.

William Stanley Hoggart, pro se.

Patricia Connors, for appellee/respon-dent.

PER CURIAM.

Hoggart filed an untimely notice of appeal of an order denying his motion for *130post conviction relief. That case was docketed by our clerk’s office as Case No. BK-202. Thereafter, appellant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking belated appeal, correctly pointing out that the order denying his motion for post conviction relief failed to inform him that he had a right to appeal within 30 days. That case was docketed as Case No. BL-281. A show cause order was entered and state responded admitting that appellant is entitled to belated review of the order denying his motion for post conviction relief. Therefore, the petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking belated appeal is granted.

In response to the show cause order, state also admitted that the appealed order is clearly erroneous. In his motion for post conviction relief, appellant alleged that he had received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion in part because Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 “does not authorize relief based upon grounds which could have or should have been raised at trial, and if properly preserved, on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence.” Allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel cannot generally be raised on direct appeal, but are properly determined by the trial court pursuant to a motion for post conviction relief. *Jacobs v. Wainwright,*450 So.2d 200 (Fla.1984). Although state admits error in the appealed order, it suggests that the most expeditious proceeding at this point is to dismiss the habeas petition and remand the appeal to the trial court for reconsideration of the motion for post conviction relief. If state uses the term “remand” interchangeably with “relinquishment of jurisdiction”, leaving the appeal pending in this court, we decline the suggestion. Instead, we reverse the order of the trial court denying the motion for post conviction relief and remand with instructions that the trial court consider the motion anew and either hold an evidentiary hearing or attach such portions of the record that show that appellant is not entitled to relief.

ERVIN, WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
#### In re Anthony Earl COOK.

No. 86-OB-1307.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1986.

In re Anthony Earl Cook; applying for permission to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination.

Granted. Relator is granted permission to take the July, 1986 bar examination.
*The Hon. John B. Jones, United States District Judge for

the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

 1The Hon. Garnett Thomas Eisele, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

_______________________________________________

Nos. 95-3085EA, 95-3086EA, 95-3189EA, 95-3206EA

_______________________________________________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

*

v. * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court for

* the Eastern District of

Ben Nouglas Deanda, Edward * Arkansas.

Contrell Sample, Edmond Clyde *

Sample, and Jerome Edward Wiley,** Appellants. *

___________

 Submitted: January 9, 1996

 Filed: January 16, 1996 ___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, and

JONES,* District Judge.

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The appellants, Ben Nouglas Deanda, Edward Contrell Sample,

Edmond Clyde Sample, and Jerome Edward Wiley, all entered

conditional pleas of guilty to drug offenses. On this appeal, they

challenge the decision of the District Court1 to deny their motion

to suppress evidence. 
In the main, the appeal presents only issues of fact. The

District Court decided that the appellant Wiley voluntarily opened

the door of his house to officers, and thereafter voluntarily

consented to the search of his house. These findings were based on

the District Court's determination that the testimony of the

officers was more credible than that of the defendants. The

findings are not clearly erroneous. Nor was any error of law

committed. The officers, acting on an anonymous tip, knocked on

Wiley's door and asked to come in. Wiley willingly let them in.

The officers did not enter with a display of force or otherwise in

a coercive manner. They did not demand or obtain entry under

authority of law. They simply knocked on the door and were let in.

The evidence at issue was thereafter observed either in plain view

or as a result of Wiley's consent to search the entire house.

Affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT32**

**CERTIFICATION**

Each of the undersignedofficers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies to hisknowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which thiscertification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 9, 2006 |   | /s/ Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D.       |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D.           |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer and President |
|                   |   |                                  |
|                   |   | /s/ W. Bradford Smith                 |
|                   |   | W. Bradford Smith                     |
|                   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

This certification isbeing furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any documentfor any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the SecuritiesAct of 1933.

----
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 354

Amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing for certain

appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee,

the Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the Small Business Committee, and the Veterans’ Affairs Committee.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Amending paragraphs 2 and 3(a) of Rule XXV and providing

for certain appointments to the Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry Committee, the Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs Committee, the Finance Committee, the

Small Business Committee, and the Veterans’ Affairs

Committee.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding any other provision

2 of Rule XXV, paragraph 2 of Rule XXV of the Standing

3 Rules of the Senate is amended as follows:

4 Strike the figure after ‘‘Agriculture, Nutrition, and

5 Forestry’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘20’’.
2

SRES 354 ATS

1 Strike the figure after ‘‘Banking, Housing, and

2 Urban Affairs’’ and insert in lieu thereof ‘‘22’’.

3 SEC. 2. That Rule XXV, paragraph 3(a) of the

4 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended as follows:

5 Strike the figure after ‘‘Veterans’ Affairs’’ and insert

6 in lieu thereof ‘‘14’’.

7 SEC. 3. That on the Committee on Agriculture, Nu8 trition, and Forestry, the Senator from Oregon (Mr.

9 Smith) is hereby appointed to serve as a majority member;

10 that the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Miller) is hereby ap11 pointed to serve as a minority member; and that the Ma12 jority Leader is hereby authorized to appoint one majority

13 member of that committee.

14 SEC. 4. That on the Committee on Banking, Hous15 ing, and Urban Affairs, the Senator from Georgia (Mr.

16 Miller) is hereby appointed to serve as a minority member,

17 and that the Majority Leader is hereby authorized to ap18 point one majority member to that committee.

19 SEC. 5. That on the Committee on Finance, the Sen20 ator from Idaho (Mr. Craig) is hereby appointed to serve

21 as a majority member.

22 SEC. 6. That on the Committee on Small Business,

23 the Majority Leader is hereby authorized to appoint one

24 majority member to that committee.
3

SRES 354 ATS

1 SEC. 7. That on the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs,

2 the Senator from Georgia (Mr. Miller) is hereby appointed

3 to serve as a minority member, and that the Majority

4 Leader is hereby authorized to appoint a majority member

5 to that committee.

Æ
#### Tanya SINGLETON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2191.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 9, 1987.

PER CURIAM.

Tanya Singleton appeals the summary denial of her motion to allow credit for jail time. Although the trial judge denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing, he did not attach to his order any portion of the files or record to refute appellant’s allegation.

Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file an answer within a time certain. After receipt of the answer, the court shall determine whether an evi-dentiary hearing is required. If the court should again deny appellant’s motion, she has thirty days in which to appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
'" E^ARTMENT OP ^ " ^ 

•.:^'vET OPERATIONS '^ 

A / R L ; iV E 5 

September 13, 2010 

Dennis J. DeVany 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

SkyWest Airlines Essential Air Service Proposal for Imperial, California. 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

Attached is the SkyWest Airlines proposal for continued service to Imperial, California. 

Our proposal is to provide two direct round trips daily (13 round trips per week) to Los 

Angeles, California (LAX) with no intermediate stops or aircraft flow from other cities. 

Please note that this is different than our current service pattern which consists of both 

non-stop and one-stop flights to LAX. A sample schedule is also attached. Service will 

be provided with the Embraer Brasilia (EMB-120) 30-seat turboprop aircraft. The 

proposal period is for January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. 

These flights will be operated as United Express, pursuant to a code-sharing agreement 

with United Airlines, and will provide connections in Los Angeles to the national 

transportation system. 

SkyWest welcomes the opportunity to continue to provide reliable service if selected. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

fc 

Michael Thompson 

Vice President - Market Development 

SkyWest Airlines 
Sample schedule for IPL-LAX: 

To: LOS ANGELES INTL From: LOS ANGELES INTL 

Dep Arr Freq Dep Air Freq 

08:40 09:48 1234567 07:25 08:25 1234567 

20:32 21:40 12345 7 19:05 20:05 12345 7 
SkyWest Airlines 

Imperial 

10-Sep-lO 

Number of round-trips per week 

Aircraft Type - Embraer Brasilia 

Passenger Revenue 

Passengers 

Average Fare 

Revenue 

Block Time 

Trip blocl< time - IVIinutes 

Total scheduled block time 

Total completed block time 

RPIVIS 

Passengers 

Stage Length 

ASMS 

Scheduled Departures 

Competed Departures 

Stage length 

Available Seats 

2011-2012 

Imperial 

Los Angeles 

13 

98% 

s $ 

10,500 

76.50 

803,250 

64 

1,442 

1,413 

10,500 

182 

98% 

1,911,000 

1,352 

1,325 

182 

30 

7,381,920 

Revenue 

Direct Operating Expenses 

Flight attendant 

RPM related 

Departure related 

ASM related 

Operating income (loss) 

5% profit margin 

Subsidy requirement 

SkyWest effective rates per unit 

Per trip 

Per passenger 

SkyWest cost per block hour 

Effective Subsidy rate per unit 

Per trip 

Per passenger 

SkyWest cost per block hour 

Load factor 

Average fuel cost per gallon 

803,250 

BIkHr S 1,153.19 

BIk Hr $ 34.49 

RPMS S 0.01 

Departures S 408.46 

ASMS S 0.04 

s 

s $ 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

s 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

1,629,789 

48,743 

24,143 

541,198 

285,022 

2,528,896 

(1,725,646) 

126,445 

1,852,091 

1,909 

241 

1,789 

1,398 

176 

1,789 

26% 

2.75