alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2008
    /s/ Charles W. HunterName:
    Charles W. HunterTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of XL Generation  International
Inc. (the  "Registrant")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Alain Lemieux, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the  Registrant,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            1.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Registrant.


Date: September 13, 2005                By: /s/ Alain Lemieux
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Name:  Alain Lemieux
                                            Title: President, Chief Executive
                                                   Officer, and Member of the
                                                   Board of Directors
THOMAS EARL McPHAUL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5792

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 20, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kevin J. Carroll, Judge.

Thomas Earl McPhaul, pro se, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David Campbell, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Joe Lee PEPPERS v. STATE.

CR-92-0633.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 1993.

Clyde Baker, Guntersville, for appellant.

*759James H. Evans, Atty. Gen. and Norbert Williams, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*On Return to Remand*

PATTERSON, Judge.

On June 18, 1993, 629 So.2d 758, we remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to hold a new sentencing hearing to determine whether the appellant, Joe Lee Peppers, had been convicted of one or two prior felonies. On original submission, we could not determine from the record whether the appellant had been convicted of one or two prior felonies and, therefore, could not review the legality of his sentences under the Alabama Habitual Felony Offender Act. We instructed the court that if it found that the appellant had been convicted of two prior felonies, the sentence initially imposed should stand; however, if it found that he had been convicted of only one prior felony, it should resentence the appellant accordingly.

The trial court has complied with our instructions and has filed a return, showing that the state proved only one prior felony conviction. The court, pursuant to our instructions, resentenced the appellant as a habitual offender with one prior felony conviction to 22 years’ imprisonment on each of the two sodomy counts and to 5 years’ imprisonment on the sexual abuse count. The court ordered that the sentences be served concurrently.

The appellant now having been properly sentenced and no other issues being raised on appeal, the judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
#### James H. REYNOLDS, Barbara Reynolds, Ole E. Ness, Mrs. Paul Peter Bozes, Richard J. Lind, Linda Schlumbrecht, Charles B. Eddy, Helma N. Pierce, Adele Gallo Foles, Adele Gallo v. James J. LICCARDI, Jr., as President of and the St. Bernard Parish Police Jury.

No. 87-C-1115.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Reynolds, James H.; Reynolds, Barbara; Ness, Ole E.; Bozes, Paul Peter *74Mrs.; Lmd, Richard J.; Schlumbrecht, Linda; Eddy, Charles B.; Pierce, Helma N.; Foies, Adele Gallo; Gallo, Adele; applying for writ of certiorari; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6164; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 51-622.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 654.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *“Report”*), I, Michael Carroll, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | November 19, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Michael Carroll     |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   |   | Michael Carroll         |   |
|   |              |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |                   |        |        |                         |        |  |
Order entered November 30 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01400

- CR

AHMAD RASHAD HAWKINS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. F14

- 30754

- K



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion to substitute counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to

substitute Sarah Fox as appellant’s retained attorney of record in place of Katherine Drew.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Sarah Fox, Katherine Drew, and

the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 169

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30, 1999

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. GRAHAM)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on Armed Services

RESOLUTION

Whereas General Wesley K. Clark has had a long and distinguished military career, which includes graduating first

in the class of 1966 from the United States Military

Academy at West Point and serving in command positions at every level in the United States Army, culminating in service concurrently in the positions of Supreme

Allied Commander, Europe and Commander-in-Chief of

the United States European Command;

Whereas General Clark was integral to the formulation of the

Dayton Accords;

Whereas General Clark most recently distinguished himself

by his tireless, resourceful, and successful leadership of

the first military action of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization despite severe constraints; and

Whereas General Clark’s record of exemplary and dedicated

service is an example which all military officers should
2

•SRES 169 IS

seek to emulate and is deserving of special recognition:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the United States Senate commends and ex3 presses its gratitude to General Wesley K. Clark,

4 United States Army, for his outstanding record of

5 military service to the United States of America; and

6 (2) the Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

7 a copy of this resolution to General Wesley K. Clark.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lois JACKSON.

No. 88-KH-0811.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Jackson, Lois; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 284-450.

Granted. The district court is ordered to provide relator with a copy of her *Boykin*examination, waiver of rights form and bill of information in No. 284-450 “A”.
State of TexasAppellee/s 

# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** February 20, 2014 N o s . 04 - 14 - 00004 - CR , 04 - 14 - 00005 - CR, 04 - 1 4 - 00006 - CR & 04 - 14 - 00007 - CR Devon Alexander KANE , Appellant v. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No s . A1319 , A1320, A 1321 & A1322

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER In the interest of the efficient administration of the court ’ s docket, we order Appeal Nos. 04 - 14 - 00004 - CR, 04 - 14 - 00005 - CR, 04 - 14 - 00006 - CR , and 04 - 14 - 00007 - CR consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put all appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, the entire case must be argu ed as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. The court will dispose of all of the appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel, the district clerk, and the court reporter.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of February, 2014 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
#### Mary Ann MOORE, Administratrix of the Estate of Matthew A. Moore, Jr., Deceased v. Danny Joe DAVIS, Individually; Bonnie June Ayres, Dr. Jim G. Barnett, Dr. L.G. Hopkins, Gwendolyn Loper, Robert Lott, Dr. Gilbert MacVaugh, Jr., Katherine Carr Ray, Dr. Reginald P. White; and J.C. Williamson, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the Mississippi State Board of Mental Health; The Mississippi Board of Mental Health, etc.

No. 57806.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 3, 1988.

Rabun Jones, Dyer, Dyer, Dyer & Jones, Greenville, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by Signey J. Martin, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Helen Wetherbee, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County; B.B. Wilkes, Judge.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6563

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALVON ALLEN THOMAS, a/k/a Kebo, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-97-118, CA-00-156-1) Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001 Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alvon Allen Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alvon Allen Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Thomas’ motions for a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas , Nos. CR-97-118, CA-00-156-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Jan. 23, 2001; entered Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,174,965
<SECURITIES>                                   107,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  315,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                    204,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,836,832
<PP&E>                                          54,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,869,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          234,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,237
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,635,065
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,869,308
<SALES>                                      1,574,855
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,638,537
<CGS>                                          597,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,611,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,752
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,752
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,752
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .0002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .0002
        

</TABLE>
Back to Contents

Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aearo Company I (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey S. Kulka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

|   |      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Jeffrey S. KulkaJeffrey S. KulkaSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officerand SecretaryFebruary 13, 2006

A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aearo Company I and will be retained by Aearo Company I and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request.

42

----
Notes from Meeting with NACDS et al

Attended by:

NACDS Staff: Diane Darvey

COSTCO staff: Jon McArthur

CVS Staff: Pat Perry

Walgreens Staff: Mary Hendrickson, Ed Kaleta, Andy Marks

Walmart Staff: Richard Leahy, Mike Stephenson

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald, Lisa Lauer, Jessica Young, Charlotte Mooney, Richard 

Huggins

Date: November 14, 2012

EPA met with representatives of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and its members. 

They conveyed some key concerns that they hope will be addressed by the proposed hazardous 

waste pharmaceuticals rule:

1. Reverse Distribution

2. P-listed pharmaceuticals (e.g., nicotine) driving large quantity generator (LQG) status

They remarked that state Board of Pharmacy rules and FDA rules make reuse and donation of 

pharmaceuticals difficult.
# Úradný vestník C 123A/16.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 123A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6316. apríla 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 123A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6316. apríla 2020

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | Korigendá |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach — EPSO/AD/375/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre dánsky jazyk (DA) EPSO/AD/376/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre grécky jazyk (EL) EPSO/AD/377/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre francúzsky jazyk (FR) EPSO/AD/378/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre chorvátsky jazyk (HR) EPSO/AD/379/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre poľský jazyk (PL) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

Korigendá

2020/C 123 A/01

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach — EPSO/AD/375/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre dánsky jazyk (DA) EPSO/AD/376/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre grécky jazyk (EL) EPSO/AD/377/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre francúzsky jazyk (FR) EPSO/AD/378/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre chorvátsky jazyk (HR) EPSO/AD/379/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre poľský jazyk (PL) ( Ú. v. EÚ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

( Ú. v. EÚ C 72 A, 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

Korigendá

| 16.4.2020 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 123/1

---

Korigendum k oznámeniu o verejných výberových konaniach — EPSO/AD/375/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre dánsky jazyk (DA) EPSO/AD/376/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre grécky jazyk (EL) EPSO/AD/377/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre francúzsky jazyk (FR) EPSO/AD/378/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre chorvátsky jazyk (HR) EPSO/AD/379/20 — právnici lingvisti (AD 7) pre poľský jazyk (PL)

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie C 72 A z 5. marca 2020
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

Na strane 1:

namiesto:

„Dátum uzávierky: 7. apríl 2020 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času“

má byť:

má byť:

„Dátum uzávierky: 5. máj 2020 o 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času“

Na strane 6:

namiesto:

namiesto:

„Prihláste sa online na webovom sídle úradu EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

7. apríla 2020 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času.“

má byť:

má byť:

„Prihláste sa online na webovom sídle úradu EPSO http://jobs.eu-careers.eu do:

5. mája 2020 do 12.00 hod. (poludnie) bruselského času.“

---