alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.17


                                  NYMAGIC, INC.
                  330 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10017-5001
                                  212-551-0600

July 9, 2002

Mr. Paul Hart
6 Walt Whitman Trail
Morristown, NJ 07960


Re: Offer of Employment

Dear Paul:

We are pleased to confirm our offer for the position of General Counsel and
Corporate Secretary of NYMAGIC, INC., reporting directly to me.

Your employment package entails the following:

Salary: A base salary of two hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($225,000)
paid on our regular semi-monthly payroll cycle.

Bonus: You are eligible for a bonus for year 2002 based on the bonus plan in
force at the time bonuses are awarded.

Stock Options: A recommendation to the NYMAGIC, INC. Board of Directors will be
made for a stock option award of sixteen thousand (16,000) shares of NYMAGIC
stock at the commencement of your employment.

Vacation: Four (4) weeks vacation, prorated based on your start date.

Benefits: A complete benefits package that includes: group health and life
insurance, dental insurance, voluntary accident insurance, long term disability
(after two months), 401K (after six months of employment), and participation in
the Monday Purchase/Profit Sharing Plans.

Severance: Severance providing for 3 months salary if your employment is
involuntarily terminated.

We look forward to you joining us, and feel confident that the energy and ideas
that you will bring to NYMAGIC, INC. will make us an even stronger organization.

If you have any questions, or would like to discuss our benefits further, please
feel free to call Diane Votinelli at 212-551-0733.

Very truly yours,

/s/ George R. Trumbull

George R. Trumbull
Chairman, C.E.O.
#### Winder Unemployment Compensation Case.

*129Argued December 13, 1961.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Rhodes, P. J., absent).

*Mercer D.*Tate, for appellant.

*Sydney*Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with Mm *David*Stahl, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

January 16, 1962:

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Florence Winder was last employed as a clerk by the United States Revenue Service, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Her final day of work was January 31, 1960, on which date she had a valid separation. Mrs. Winder thereafter filed an application for unemployment compensation, and received benefits for thirty weeks. On March 7, 1961, having had no intervening employment, she filed an application for benefits for a second benefit year, which was within ninety days after the termination of the preceding benefit year. Her application was disallowed by the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that she had failed to comply with the active registration requirement set forth in Section 4(av) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation LaAV. Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937) 2897, 43 P.S. 751 et seq. TMs appeal followed.

*130The record discloses that, on October 11, 1960, claimant exhausted her entitlement for the first benefit year by filing a claim for her final compensable week. On that date, according to her own signed statement, claimant was notified of the requirement of Section 4(w) (2) that she must maintain an active registration for work by reporting to the local office at intervals of not more than sixty days, and was given a form UC-483. See *Lodge Unemployment Compensation Case,*194 Pa. Superior Ct. 626, 169 A. 2d 305. Claimant reported on November 21, 1960, but did not report thereafter until January 30, 1961, an interval of more than sixty days.

It is contended on this appeal that the statutory requirement that a claimant report “at intervals of not more than sixty (60) days” should be construed to mean that a claimant must report “once during each of successive 60-day interval periods”. However, we have consistently taken the position that the statute means just what it says, namely, that there must not be an interval of more than sixty days between reports. In *Kuhnert Unemployment Compensation Case,*195 Pa. Superior Ct. 253, 171 A. 2d 537, we said: “Claimant reported on April 11, 1960, so that the last day of his next report period was June 10, 1960”. There are a number of cases in which a claimant reported twice within one hundred twenty days, as did Mrs. Winder, but was denied benefits on the ground that the interval between the first and second report was more than sixty days. See, inter alia, *Rosemas Unemployment Compensation Case,*195 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, 171 A. 2d 534; *Doble Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 367, 175 A. 2d 345; *Peluso Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 526, 175 A. 2d 923; *Grunden Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 528, 175 A. 2d 924.

Decision affirmed.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)





OF
      THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 24, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
      N. Stein, Senior Vice President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




|1. | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
              Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:
      November 7, 2008





/s/
                Joseph SteinJoseph
                N. SteinSenior
                Vice PresidentEPL
                Intermediate, Inc.





This
      certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and
      not
      for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required
      by
      Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47307-47308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18732]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DoD-2012-OS-0060]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 47308]]

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
September 4, 2013.
    Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: How Differences in 
Pedagogical Methods Impact ChalleNGe Program Outcomes; OMB Control 
Number: 0704-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 150.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 150.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 50 hours.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain data on the pedagogical methods of National Guard Youth 
ChalleNGe program teachers. The data will be used by DoD to evaluate 
how differences in classroom teaching methods impact program outcomes. 
The data will also be used to identify those policies and techniques 
that are most effective so they may be shared program-wide.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: One time.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Jasmeet Seehra at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings, WHS/ESD, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 2nd 
floor, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: July 30, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-18732 Filed 8-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
**HA~AIIAN** -ftiRLIOfS

. - May 26, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration Orville Wright Building (FOB-10A) 800 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20591 Subject

:Time-limited Exemption from Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations

( 14 CFR) part 91, § 91.227(c)(1 )(i) and (iii)-Automatic Dependent SurveillanceBroadcast (ADS-B) Out Equipment Performance Requirements. Reference: Grant of Exemption No. 12555, Regulatory Docket No .FAA-2015-0971. Grant of Exemption 12555 provides for atime-limited grant of exemption from the ADS- 8 Navigation Accuracy Category for Position (NACp) and Navigat

i on Integrity Category (NIC) requirements of§ 91.227(c)(1 )(i) and (iii) from January 1, 2020

,through December 31 ,2024. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.
,of 3375 Koapaka Street, Suite G-350, Honolulu, Hawaii 96819- 1869 herby notifies the FAA that weintend to comply with the conditions and limitations expressed in the exemption cited above

. Sincerely, **cJ~~** Jonathan Goo Senior Director

,Quality Assurance Copies

: AFS-1 (mailto

: 9-AWA-Equip.2020@faa

.gov) Johannes Linschoten- FAA POl, WP-HNL-CMO Margaret Cumm

i sky- Managing Director

,Federal Government Affa

i rs P .O .Bo x30008

,Honolulu

,Hl96 82 0I P :80 8. 835. 3310

I M: 808

.22 2 .59 9 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

YANKEE ENERGY SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Computation


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             For theYears Ended September 30

                                               1999                1998                1997
                                               ----                ----                ----
                                                     (In thousands, except share data)

<S>                                     <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Net Income                              $    13,375         $    10,883         $    16,957

Weighted Average Common
  Shares Outstanding

Basic                                    10,609,293          10,495,806          10,451,165

Stock Options                                13,724               4,004               2,153

Diluted                                  10,623,017          10,499,810          10,453,318

Basic Earnings
  Per Share                             $      1.26         $      1.04         $      1.62

Diluted Earnings
  Per Share                             $      1.26         $      1.04         $      1.62
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Elder, Fe lton and Senior Judge Willis

ERIC HUNK WING YIP MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1159-04-4 PER CURIAM NOVEMBER 16, 2004 JANET YIP

FROM THE CIRCUIT COUR T OF FAIRFAX COUNTY Leslie M. Alden, Judge (Eric Hunk Wing Yip, pro se , on brief). (Jennifer E. Mandell, on brief), for appellee.
Eric Hunk Wing Yip, husban d, appeals a final order of th e trial court granting Janet Yip, wife, a divorce. On appeal, hu sband asserts: (1) he was not allowed to speak during wife’s deposition; (2) his attorney would not allow him to offer certain evidence to prove damage to the marriage; (3) he was not allowed to offer evidence that wife manipulated particular investment accounts; and (4) a handwritten Memo randum of Understanding of Settlement between the parties was altered after he signed the document. Upon re viewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27. Many of appellant’s citations to the record are inadequate for us to determine where the questions presented were preserved in the trial court. See Rule 5A:20(c). In addition, appellant cites no principles of la w or legal authorities rela ting to the questions pres ented. Rule 5A:20(e) requires that the appellant’s open ing brief include the “principles of law, the argument, and the

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.- 2 - authorities relating to each ques tion presented.” Appellant’s op ening brief does not meet the requirements of Rule 5A:20. As we noted in Buchanan v. Buchanan , 14 Va. App. 53 , 56, 415 S.E.2d 237, 239 (1992), “[s]tatements unsupported by argument, authority, or citations to the record do not merit appellate consideration. We will not sear ch the record for errors in or der to interpret the appellant’s contention and correct defici encies in a brief.” See also Theismann v. Theismann , 22 Va. App. 557, 572, 471 S.E.2d 809, 816 (declining to address an argument on appeal that was inadequately developed in appella nt’s brief), aff’d en banc , 23 Va. App. 697, 479 S.E. 2d 534 (1996); Fitzgerald
v. Bass , 6 Va. App. 38, 56 n. 7, 366 S.E.2d 615, 625 n. 7 (1988) ( en banc ) (noting it is not this Court’s “function to comb through the record . . . in order to ferret-out for ourselves the validity of [appellant’s ] claims”). Hence, we find appellant’s questions presente d do not warrant appellate consideration, and we, therefore, do not consider them on appeal. Wife requests attorney’s fees and costs incurred in defense of this appeal. Upon consideration of the entire record in this case, we hold that wife is entitled to a reas onable amount of attorney’s fees and costs. See O’Loughlin v. O’Loughlin , 23 Va. App. 690, 695, 479 S.E.2d 98, 100 (1996). Accordingly, we rema nd the matter to the trial court for it to determine the proper amount of the award. Accordingly, we affirm the d ecision of the trial court. Affirmed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Thomas P. Russo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the Registrant), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 of the Registrant (the Report):

(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


By:
      /S/
              THOMAS P. RUSSOThomas P. RussoExecutive
            Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer ofMetaMorphix,
            Inc.


Date: May 18, 2007

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

I, Allan Silber, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of I-Link Incorporated;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         [Intentionallyomitted];

 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(d)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:October 25, 2004

 

By:

/s/  Allan Silber

 

Allan Silber

 

President, Chief Executive  Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Rotoblock Corporation
      (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Matthias Heinze, Chief Executive Officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.










Date:
      September 14, 2006     ROTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION





/s/
      Matthias Heinze


By:
      Matthias Heinze, President,


Chief
      Executive Officer and Director
# Diario Oficial C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 145 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 63.° año30 de abril de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 145

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

63.° año30 de abril de 2020

---

| Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Consejo |
| 2020/C 145/01 | Decisión del Consejo de 28 de abril de 2020 por la que se nombra a miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico | 1 |

Sumario

Página

Consejo

2020/C 145/01

Decisión del Consejo de 28 de abril de 2020 por la que se nombra a miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Consejo

| 30.4.2020 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 145/1

---

DECISIÓN DEL CONSEJO

de 28 de abril de 2020

por la que se nombra a miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico

(2020/C 145/01)

EL CONSEJO DE LA UNIÓN EUROPEA,

Visto el Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea de la Energía Atómica, y en particular su artículo 134, apartado 2,

Previa consulta a la Comisión Europea,

Considerando lo siguiente:

| (1) | Mediante Decisión de 6 de noviembre de 2018 (1), el Consejo nombró a los miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico (en lo sucesivo, «Comité»), para el período comprendido entre el 6 de noviembre de 2018 y el 6 de noviembre de 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Mediante Decisión de 6 de noviembre de 2018 (1), el Consejo nombró a los miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico (en lo sucesivo, «Comité»), para el período comprendido entre el 6 de noviembre de 2018 y el 6 de noviembre de 2023.

| (2) | A raíz del fallecimiento de D. Eugenijus UŠPURAS, ha quedado vacante un puesto de miembro en el Comité. Por consiguiente, procede nombrar a un nuevo miembro para el resto del mandato de D. Eugenijus UŠPURAS. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A raíz del fallecimiento de D. Eugenijus UŠPURAS, ha quedado vacante un puesto de miembro en el Comité. Por consiguiente, procede nombrar a un nuevo miembro para el resto del mandato de D. Eugenijus UŠPURAS.

| (3) | A raíz de la dimisión de D. Grzegorz WROCHNA, ha quedado vacante un puesto de miembro en el Comité. Por consiguiente, procede nombrar a un nuevo miembro para el resto del mandato de D. Grzegorz WROCHNA. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A raíz de la dimisión de D. Grzegorz WROCHNA, ha quedado vacante un puesto de miembro en el Comité. Por consiguiente, procede nombrar a un nuevo miembro para el resto del mandato de D. Grzegorz WROCHNA.

HA ADOPTADO LA PRESENTE DECISIÓN:

Artículo 1

Se nombra miembro del Comité Científico y Técnico hasta el 6 de noviembre de 2023 a D. Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS y a D. Józef SOBOLEWSKI.

Artículo 2

La presente Decisión entrará en vigor el día de su adopción.

Hecho en Bruselas, el 28 de abril de 2020.

Por el Consejo

El Presidente

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Decisión del Consejo, de 6 de noviembre de 2018, por la que se nombra a los miembros del Comité Científico y Técnico (DO C 403 de 9.11.2018, p. 2).

1

---