[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19345-19357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Proposed Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction 
Restrictions

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor.

[[Page 19346]]


ACTION: Notice of Proposed Exemptions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains notices of pendency before the 
Department of Labor (the Department) of proposed exemptions from 
certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). This notice includes the 
following proposed exemptions: D-11582, South Plains Financial, Inc. 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the Plan or the Applicant); and D-11668, 
TIB Financial Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) 
Provisions (the Plan).

DATES: All interested persons are invited to submit written comments or 
requests for a hearing on the pending exemptions, unless otherwise 
stated in the Notice of Proposed Exemption, within 45 days from the 
date of publication of this Federal Register Notice.

ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for a hearing should state: (1) The 
name, address, and telephone number of the person making the comment or 
request, and (2) the nature of the person's interest in the exemption 
and the manner in which the person would be adversely affected by the 
exemption. A request for a hearing must also state the issues to be 
addressed and include a general description of the evidence to be 
presented at the hearing.
    All written comments and requests for a hearing (at least three 
copies) should be sent to the Employee Benefits Security Administration 
(EBSA), Office of Exemption Determinations, Room N-5700, U.S. 
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. 
Attention: Application No. --------, stated in each Notice of Proposed 
Exemption. Interested persons are also invited to submit comments and/
or hearing requests to EBSA via email or FAX. Any such comments or 
requests should be sent either by email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0bdbfb6b6b9a4a4feb2b5a4a4a990b4bfbcfeb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93fefcf5f5fae7e7bdf1f6e7e7ead3f7fcffbdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
by FAX to (202) 219-0204 by the end of the scheduled comment period. 
The applications for exemption and the comments received will be 
available for public inspection in the Public Documents Room of the 
Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 
Room N-1513, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
    Warning: If you submit written comments or hearing requests, do not 
include any personally-identifiable or confidential business 
information that you do not want to be publicly-disclosed. All comments 
and hearing requests are posted on the Internet exactly as they are 
received, and they can be retrieved by most Internet search engines. 
The Department will make no deletions, modifications or redactions to 
the comments or hearing requests received, as they are public records.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Notice to Interested Persons

    Notice of the proposed exemptions will be provided to all 
interested persons in the manner agreed upon by the applicant and the 
Department within 15 days of the date of publication in the Federal 
Register. Such notice shall include a copy of the notice of proposed 
exemption as published in the Federal Register and shall inform 
interested persons of their right to comment and to request a hearing 
(where appropriate).
    The proposed exemptions were requested in applications filed 
pursuant to section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the 
Code, and in accordance with procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, 
Subpart B (76 FR 66637, 66644, October 27, 2011).\1\ Effective December 
31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. 
App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the 
Treasury to issue exemptions of the type requested to the Secretary of 
Labor. Therefore, these notices of proposed exemption are issued solely 
by the Department.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Department has considered exemption applications 
received prior to December 27, 2011 under the exemption procedures 
set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 
10, 1990).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The applications contain representations with regard to the 
proposed exemptions which are summarized below. Interested persons are 
referred to the applications on file with the Department for a complete 
statement of the facts and representations.

South Plains Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the Plan or 
the Applicant)

Located in Lubbock, TX [Application No. D-11582]

Proposed Exemption

    Based on the facts and representations set forth in the 
application, the Department is considering granting an exemption under 
the authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of 
the Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).\2\ If the 
exemption is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A), (D) 
and (E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1) and (b)(2), 407(a)(1)(A) of the Act and 
the sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975 of the 
Code, by reason of section 4975(c)(1)(A), (D) and (E) of the Code, 
shall not apply, (1) effective December 17, 2008, to the acquisition 
and holding by the Plan of certain interests (the LLC Interests) in 
SPFI Investment Group, LLC (the LLC), a former wholly owned subsidiary 
of the Plan sponsor, South Plains Financial, Inc. (SPF), which were 
distributed (the Distribution) as dividends to the Plan as a 
shareholder of SPF; and (2) the proposed redemption (the Redemption) by 
the LLC of the LLC Interests held by the Plan, provided that the 
following conditions are met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For purposes of this proposed exemption, references to 
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer 
also to corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) The Plan's acquisition and holding of the LLC Interests 
occurred in connection with the Distribution, wherein the Plan acquired 
the LLC Interests automatically and without any action on its part.
    (b) The Plan's acquisition of the LLC Interests resulted from an 
independent act of SPF as a corporate entity for business reasons which 
did not involve the Plan. As such, all shareholders of SPF, including 
the Plan, were treated in the same manner.
    (c) The Plan paid no fees or commissions in connection with the 
acquisition and holding of the LLC Interests.
    (d) Within ninety (90) days after publication of the notice 
granting the final exemption in the Federal Register, the LLC redeems 
the LLC Interests held by the Plan for no less than the greater of 
$1,036,665 or the fair market value of the LLC Interests on the date 
that the Redemption occurs.
    (e) The Redemption is a one-time sale of the LLC Interests for 
cash.
    (f) The terms and conditions of the Redemption are at least as 
favorable to the Plan as those obtainable in an arm's length 
transaction with an unrelated party.
    (g) The Plan pays no commissions, costs or other expenses in 
connection with the Redemption.
    (h) An independent fiduciary has approved the Redemption and 
monitors such transaction on behalf of the Plan.
    Effective Date: If granted, this proposed exemption will be 
effective as of December 17, 2008, with respect to the acquisition and 
holding by the Plan of the LLC Interests. In addition, this

[[Page 19347]]

proposed exemption will be effective as of the date the final exemption 
is granted with respect to the LLC's Redemption of the LLC Interests 
held by the Plan.

Summary of Facts and Representations

SPF

    1. SPF, the Plan sponsor, is located in Lubbock, Texas. SPF is a 
Texas corporation and registered bank holding company which conducts 
its principal activities through its subsidiaries' offices located 
throughout Texas and eastern New Mexico. SPF's principal activities 
include commercial and retail banking, along with insurance, 
investment, trust and mortgage services. SPF is currently taxed as a 
Subchapter S corporation for federal income tax purposes. Subsidiaries 
of SPF include the following entities: City Bank, Zia Financial 
Corporation, City Bank New Mexico and Windmark Insurance Agency, Inc. 
The subsidiaries of SPF are all adopting employers of the Plan.
    2. Curtis Griffith, Cory Newsom, Ricky Neal, Kevin Bass, Lonnie 
Hollingsworth, Larry Beseda, Bobby Neal, Jodie Riley and Danny Campbell 
are the current directors (the SPF Directors) of SPF. Each of the SPF 
Directors is a shareholder of SPF except for Danny Campbell. Curtis 
Griffith, Kevin Bass, Cory Newsom, Sandy Wallace and Steve Crockett are 
the current officers of SPF (the SPF Officers).

The Plan

    3. The Plan is an individual account plan as described in section 
3(34) of the Act. The Plan includes an employee stock ownership plan 
(the ESOP Portion) and a cash or deferred arrangement (the 401(k) 
Portion). The ESOP Portion of the Plan is designed to invest primarily 
in qualifying employer securities pursuant to section 4975(e)(7) of the 
Code.
    Participants' individual accounts are divided into sub-accounts, 
which include the following: (a) A Company Stock Account, which 
contains the shares of qualifying employer securities allocated 
pursuant to the ESOP Portion of the Plan; (b) an Other Investments 
Account, which contains the allocations of net gain of the Plan, 
forfeitures and employer contributions in other than the qualifying 
employer securities (the LLC Interests are held in a sub-account of a 
participant's Other Investments Account); (c) an Elective Account, 
which contains a participant's pre-tax elective deferrals and Roth 
elective deferrals (no part of the Elective Account is invested in 
qualifying employer securities); and (d) a Rollover Account, which 
contains distributions from other qualified retirement plans (no part 
of the Rollover Account is invested in qualifying employer securities).
    Pursuant to an amendment to the Plan effective January 1, 2011, the 
``ESOP Committee'' is the administrator of the Plan (the Plan 
Administrator). Curtis Griffith, Cory Newsom, Steve Crockett, Rob Dean, 
Larry Beseda and Raymond Richardson are the current members of the 
``ESOP Committee''. SPF was the Plan Administrator prior to the ``ESOP 
Committee''.
    4. City Bank is a Texas chartered bank subsidiary of SPF and 
adopting employer of the Plan.\3\ Its trust department serves as a 
directed trustee (the Trustee) with respect to: (a) The Company Stock 
Account; (b) the participant-directed investments of participant 
elective contributions in the Elective Account; (c) the participant 
rollover contributions in the Rollover Account; and (d) the investment 
of SPF stock pursuant to direction from the Plan Administrator. The 
Trustee is also a discretionary trustee with respect to the investment 
of assets which are held in the Other Investments Account and which are 
not participant directed (i.e., participant elective contributions in 
the Elective Account and rollover contributions in the Rollover 
Account). The Trustee follows the guidelines of the Funding and 
Investment Policy, but acts with discretion as to the time and manner 
of the implementation of such policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ City Bank directors (the City Bank Directors) include the 
SPF Directors. City Bank officers (the City Bank Officers) include 
Curtis Griffith, Mike Liner, Cory Newsom, and Kevin Bass, who are 
both SPF Directors and City Bank Directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    5. As of December 17, 2008, the date of the Distribution described 
herein, the Plan had a total of 953 participants \4\ and assets with an 
approximate aggregate fair market value of $40,162,889 (excluding the 
value of the LLC Interests that were acquired that day). As of the same 
date, about 77.15% or $30,984,190 of the Plan's assets was invested in 
SPF stock. Also as of the same date, an estimated 882 Plan participants 
held a total of 99,949 shares of SPF stock, representing an 
approximately 24.05% ownership interest in SPF.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Plan's participants also included and continue to 
include many of the officers and directors of the entities described 
herein.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Of the 99,949 SPF shares held by the Plan, 70,280 shares were 
allocated to Plan participant accounts and 29,669 shares were held in 
an unallocated suspense account as collateral for certain non-recourse 
loans (the ESOP Loans) \5\ to the Plan. The Applicant represents that 
the ESOP Loans were used to acquire qualifying employer securities and 
that such loans satisfy the statutory exemption provided under section 
408(b)(3) of the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Applicant represents that as of December 31, 2011, the 
ESOP portion of the Plan had two outstanding loans. The first loan, 
dated September 27, 2002, was made by Lubbock National Bank in the 
original amount of $5,999,928. Each principal payment is $600,000 
and is due in January of each year. As of December 31, 2011, there 
was one principal payment remaining. The interest rate is the prime 
interest rate published in the Wall Street Journal with a floor of 
5.15% and a ceiling of not more than 9% per annum. The interest 
projection for 2012 was approximately $8,000. As of December 31, 
2011, the balance of the first loan was $599,822.
    The second loan, dated May 25, 2007, was also made by Lubbock 
National Bank in the original amount of $6,767,360. Each principal 
payment is $676,735 and is due in January of each year. As of 
December 31, 2011, there was one principal payment remaining. The 
interest rate is a variable, per diem rate equal to the prime 
interest rate published in the Wall Street Journal less 50 basis 
points. As of December 31, 2011, the balance of that loan was 
$4,060,416. The Applicant represents that both loans have satisfied 
the requirements of section 408(b)(3) of the Act.
    \6\ The Department expresses no opinion herein regarding whether 
the conditions of section 408(b)(3) of the Act have been satisfied. 
In this regard, the Department notes that it is providing no relief 
for the ESOP Loans beyond that provided in the statutory exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    6. As of December 31, 2010, the Plan had a total of 1,026 
participants and assets with an approximate aggregate fair market value 
of $33,315,524. As of the same date, 57% or $18,990,310 of the Plan's 
assets was invested in SPF stock. Also as of December 31, 2010, out of 
the 1,026 Plan participants, an estimated 964 Plan participants held a 
total of 79,828 shares of the 411,454 outstanding shares of SPF (which, 
together with the 24,895 shares of SPF held by the Plan in a suspense 
account, equaled 24.29% of SPF).

The Property

    7. On November 19, 1991, City Bank purchased a parcel of improved 
real property located at 5219 City Bank Parkway (the Property) for 
$2,800,000 from CSM, Inc., an unrelated party. In October 1993, SPF 
acquired City Bank and City Bank's assets, including the Property for 
$4,900,000. SPF believed that the acquisition of City Bank and its 
assets was a prudent investment and would increase its West Texas 
presence.
    8. The Property is an irregularly-shaped site that consists of 
9.8762 acres of land, made up of the bank site at 8.9862 acres, and 
excess land of 0.89 acres. The Property is improved with a 3-story, 
multi-tenant office building containing 116,616 square feet (gross 
building area). Total net rentable area for the building is computed as 
85,001 square feet. The building was

[[Page 19348]]

constructed in 1983 and has undergone numerous remodels over the years. 
The Property has been used for City Bank's main office in Lubbock, 
Texas since its acquisition.

The LLC

    9. On November 12, 2008, City Bank formed the LLC, which is also 
located at 5219 City Bank Parkway, Lubbock, Texas, as a Texas limited 
liability company.\7\ On December 10, 2008, City Bank contributed the 
Property to the LLC in exchange for 100% of the member interest in the 
LLC. The LLC was wholly owned by City Bank from December 10, 2008 to 
December 16, 2008. On December 16, 2008, City Bank distributed 100% of 
its member interest to SPF. Accordingly, SPF became the successor 
member to City Bank. The LLC was then wholly owned by SPF from December 
16, 2008 until SPF distributed the LLC Interests to its shareholders on 
December 17, 2008. (See Representation 15.) Around the time of the 
Distribution, the LLC had cash assets totaling $696,643.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Applicant notes that the Texas Business Organizations 
Code, which applies to all Texas limited liability companies 
registered to transact business in Texas, does not require, in 
connection with the formation of a new limited liability company, 
that a person be named as an initial member in the Certificate of 
Formation. Accordingly, at the time that the LLC was formed, no 
members were listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. Since its formation, the LLC's principal business activity has 
been the rental and management of commercial real estate. The managers 
of the LLC (the LLC Managers) are Cory Newsom and Kevin Bass. In 
addition, members of the LLC include the SPF Directors, the SPF 
Officers, the City Bank Directors, and the City Bank Officers.

The Lease

    11. By lease agreement (the Lease) dated December 16, 2008, City 
Bank and the LLC entered into a triple net, ten-year lease whereby City 
Bank leased the Property from the LLC \8\ in order to continue using 
the Property as its main office space. The Lease requires monthly 
rental payments of $166,460.29 ($1,997,523.48 annually) or $23.50 per 
square foot from January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013. Beginning 
on January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2018, the monthly rental 
payment will be $183,106.32 ($2,197,275.84 annually) or $25.85 per 
square foot. The Lease is subject to eight five-year renewal periods.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Applicant represents that the Lease is not a prohibited 
transaction. The Applicant states, in pertinent part, that the 
Departments regulations (see 29 CFR 2510.3-101(a)(2)) establish a 
``look-through rule'' under which underlying assets of certain 
entities in which a plan may invest are regarded as plan assets. 
However, the Applicant explains, in pertinent part, that the ``look-
through rule'' does not apply if the equity investment in the entity 
by a benefit plan is not significant. The Applicant further explains 
that equity participation by benefit plan investors is significant 
as of any date if benefit plan investors hold 25% or more of the 
value of any class of equity interest. The Applicant states that by 
its calculation the benefit plan investors have an equity interest 
of 24.599% in the LLC. Therefore, the Applicant represents that the 
underlying assets of the LLC are not considered plan assets of such 
benefit plan investors and the Lease is not a prohibited 
transaction.
    The Department expresses no opinion herein on whether the 
underlying assets of the LLC are plan assets pursuant to 29 CFR 
2510.3-101 and, accordingly, is not proposing any relief for the 
Lease.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    City Bank currently leases 100% of the office building on the 
Property from the LLC, and occupies about 60% of the office building, 
itself. City Bank subleases the remaining space in the office building 
that it does not occupy to unrelated tenants.

The Loan

    12. A loan (the Loan) in the amount of $15,800,000 was entered into 
on December 16, 2008 between the LLC as borrower and Texas Capital 
Bank, National Association (TCB), a national banking association and 
third party lender, as both lender and administrative agent with 
respect to the Loan. The purpose of the Loan was to provide additional 
capital to City Bank. The Loan was evidenced by a credit agreement (the 
Credit Agreement), and an accompanying promissory note, both executed 
on December 16, 2008. The Credit Agreement provides that one or more 
lenders may make the Loan in an amount up to $15,800,000.
    The terms of the Loan require that the unpaid principal balance 
bear interest at the rate per annum equal to the lesser of (a) the 
maximum rate of interest which may be charged, contracted for, taken, 
received or reserved by a lender in accordance with applicable Texas 
law (or applicable United States federal law to the extent that such 
law permits a lender to charge, contract for, receive or reserve a 
greater amount of interest than under Texas law) or (b) the rate of 
interest per annum quoted in the ``money Rates'' section of The Wall 
Street Journal from time to time and designated as the ``Prime Rate''. 
The terms of the Loan further require that the Loan be repaid in 
monthly installments of principal and interest in the amount of 
$120,000 each, due and payable on the first day of each calendar month 
beginning February 1, 2009, and continuing on the first day of each 
month thereafter through, and including, January 2, 2014.
    13. TCB, as a lender, agreed to make the Loan provided that on or 
before March 31, 2009, either (a) additional lenders would become 
parties to the Loan and finance at least $3,000,000 of the Loan or buy 
at least $3,000,000 in participations in the Loan, or (b) the LLC would 
repay to TCB the difference between $3,000,000 and the amount of the 
Loan financed by other lenders.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ TCB sold a participation interest in the Loan to Founders 
Bank, SSB on or before March 31, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. The Loan is collateralized by the Property. Pursuant to the 
Credit Agreement, TCB has a first lien Deed of Trust in the Property 
and an Assignment of Rents Paid pursuant to the Lease. The LLC uses the 
monthly Lease payments it receives from City Bank to repay the Loan. 
The LLC members are also not liable for the Loan in their individual 
capacities.

The Distribution

    15. By letter dated December 15, 2008 (the Notice of Distribution), 
SPF notified its shareholders of the intended Distribution. In the 
Notice of Distribution, SPF explained that the purpose of the 
Distribution was to increase City Bank's capital by converting the 
Property into working capital that City Bank could leverage to increase 
its lending capabilities. In addition, SPF informed its shareholders of 
the Loan and Lease transactions, described above, and explained how the 
Loan proceeds would be used to increase City Bank's operating capital 
and liquidity, and how the Lease proceeds would be used to service the 
Loan, as well as provide distributions to the LLC members in an amount 
that would allow them to pay the individual tax liabilities resulting 
from their ownership of the LLC Interests. SPF was of the view that 
increasing City Bank's operating capital, and thus its liquidity, would 
allow City Bank to continue to grow and provide City Bank with a 
competitive advantage over its peer banks.
    16. On December 16, 2008, City Bank distributed its LLC Interests 
to SPF. On December 17, 2008, SPF declared a pro rata Distribution of 
the LLC Interests to its shareholders of record as of that date.\10\ 
The shareholders of SPF at the time of the Distribution collectively 
acquired 100% of the membership interests in the LLC at a book value of

[[Page 19349]]

$721,500. Neither SPF nor City Bank retained any interest in the LLC.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ Certain SPF Directors, SPF Officers, City Bank Directors, 
and City Bank Officers acquired LLC Interests in either or both 
their individual capacities and their capacities as Plan 
participants as a result of the Distribution. In addition, certain 
Plan participants (e.g., new participants) did not have SPF shares 
allocated to their Plan accounts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. The Distribution was an independent act of SPF as a corporate 
entity for business reasons which did not involve the Plan.\11\ All 
shareholders of SPF were treated in the same manner. The Plan, as a 
shareholder of SPF stock, acquired the LLC Interests automatically, 
without any action on the part of the Plan, and in proportion to its 
ownership interests in SPF. As a result of the pro rata Distribution of 
the LLC Interests, the Plan received 24.05% of the outstanding 
membership interests in the LLC. At the Plan participant level, an 
estimated 882 participants received a total of 99,949 LLC Interests of 
the 415,509 outstanding LLC Interests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Plan states that the primary purpose of the formation 
of the LLC, the Lease and the Loan transactions which resulted in 
the Distribution to the Plan was for SPF to realize the value of the 
Property which City Bank had owned for many years and which had 
appreciated. The transactions resulted in the conversion of the 
value of the Property into working capital that SPF could leverage 
to increase the capital levels of City Bank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the Plan's unaudited financial statement for December 
31, 2008, the LLC Interests acquired by the Plan in the Distribution 
were valued at that time at $721,500. The Applicant represents that the 
value was determined by adding the total estimated current fair market 
value of the Property ($18,100,000), plus cash assets in the LLC 
($700,000), subtracting the outstanding Loan on the Property in the 
amount of $15,800,000, resulting in an amount of $3,000,000, multiplied 
by the Plan's ownership percentage (24.05%), which equaled $721,500. 
The Plan paid no fees to SPF in connection with the Distribution.
    18. Pursuant to an amendment to the Plan dated December 23, 2008, 
the LLC Interests have been held on behalf of the Plan in a sub-account 
of a Plan participant's ``Other Investments Account'' known as the 
Special Trust Fund.
    Following the Distribution, each member of the LLC, other than the 
Plan, executed a Right of First Refusal Agreement.\12\ The Right of 
First Refusal Agreement requires that each member of the LLC give the 
LLC, any assignee of the LLC and the other members of the LLC, in that 
order, a right to purchase the member's LLC Interest before it can be 
sold for the offered price, provided that the offered price is equal to 
fair market value, as defined in such agreement. Aside from the Plan, 
certificates (the Certificates) evidencing the LLC Interests were 
provided upon receipt by any one of the LLC Managers of the executed 
right of first refusal agreement from all those shareholders of SPF 
receiving LLC Interests. The Certificates were issues at different 
times. The Plan's Certificate, dated December 17, 2008 and evidencing 
its ownership of LLC Interests, was received and posted to the trust 
accounting system at Argent Trust Company of Louisiana (Argent Trust), 
the Plan's independent fiduciary, on June 2, 2009.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Applicant states that around the time of the 
Distribution, its attorney, Kimberly Wilkerson, advised SPF, as the 
employer and Plan Administrator at that time, not to sign the Right 
of First Refusal Agreement on behalf of the Plan and not to ask the 
Trustee to sign a Right of First Refusal on behalf of the Plan. Ms. 
Wilkerson explains that she was concerned that the granting of the 
Right of First Refusal could result in a prohibited transaction if 
the Assignee or another LLC member was a party in interest.
    \13\ The Applicant states that there is no particular reason 
that the Certificate was not issued to Argent Trust immediately 
following the Plan's receipt of LLC Interests in the Distribution. 
The Applicant further states that the LLC Managers believed the 
Certificate only evidenced ownership and that the date the 
Certificate was issued did not affect the Plan's ownership interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Funding and Investment Policy

    19. On March 26, 2009, the SPF Directors considered and adopted a 
revised Funding and Investment Policy for the Plan in order to address 
the Plan's ownership of assets, such as the LLC Interests. 
Specifically, Section III of the Funding and Investment Policy was 
revised to provide that the Plan could not invest in any non-publicly 
traded securities other than SPF stock. In revising the Funding and 
Investment Policy, the SPF Directors considered, among other things, 
the Plan's ``investment'' in the LLC, how the LLC Interests affected 
the Plan and its design to be invested primarily in SPF stock, the 
Plan's liquidity needs, and its diversification requirements. 
Accordingly, the SPF Directors advised Argent Trust to sell the Plan's 
LLC Interests.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Department expresses no opinion herein as to whether 
the SPF Directors violated any of the general fiduciary 
responsibility provisions of Part 4 of Title I of the Act when, 
shortly following the Plan's acquisition of the LLC Interests, the 
SPF Directors specifically revised the Plan's Funding and Investment 
Policy to require that the Plan divest itself of such interests. 
However, the Department notes that section 404(a) of the Act 
requires, among other things, that a plan fiduciary act prudently 
and solely in the interest of the plan's participants and 
beneficiaries when making investment decisions on behalf of the 
plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 17, 2010, the SPF Directors adopted a revised Funding 
and Investment Policy for the Plan to once more address the Plan's 
ownership of the LLC Interests. Specifically, Section III of the 
Funding and Investment Policy was revised to provide that the Plan 
could not invest in any non-publicly traded securities other than SPF 
stock, except to the extent that Argent Trust, the Plan's independent 
fiduciary, determined that an investment in the LLC Interests was in 
the best interests of the Plan. In revising the Funding and Investment 
Policy, the SPF Directors decided the change was in the best interests 
of Plan participants so that there would be no question that the 
decision to sell the Plan's LLC Interests was being made solely in the 
interests of the participants and with the requisite prudence and 
diligence by an independent fiduciary.
    On June 7, 2011, the Funding and Investment Policy was revised 
again by the ESOP Committee. However, no changes were made to Section 
III of such policy.

The Qualified Independent Fiduciary

    20. By an Appointment of Trustee Agreement (the Appointment 
Agreement), executed on December 26, 2008 between Argent Trust and SPF 
on behalf of the Plan, Argent Trust became the Plan's independent 
fiduciary, effective December 19, 2008, with respect to the custody, 
management and sale of the Plan's LLC Interests to the LLC. Argent 
Trust, a subsidiary of Argent Financial Group, Inc. (AFG), is a 
privately held trust bank regulated by the United States Office of the 
Comptroller of Currency. Originating as the trust department of Ruston 
State Bank, Argent Trust has roots dating back to 1930. In 1990, the 
trust department of Ruston State Bank was transferred to an independent 
banking charter forming The Trust Company of Louisiana (TTCL). In 1991, 
certain individual shareholders of TTCL purchased TTCL and formed AFG 
as a holding company. TTCL obtained a national banking charter and the 
name was changed to National Independent Trust Company, with Argent 
Trust as a division of that company. As of December 31, 2010, Argent 
Trust had assets equal to $1,086,490,000, and five offices staffed with 
24 professionals. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Argent Trust 
generated revenue of $4,245,062.
    21. Argent Trust represents that it is qualified to act as 
independent fiduciary for the Plan because it has a long history of 
serving as a fiduciary and trustee to qualified plans. In this regard, 
Argent Trust has historically served, and currently does serve, as 
trustee of several ESOPs, primarily sponsored by financial 
institutions. These ESOPs include plans that are leveraged, plans for 
both closely-held and publically traded sponsors, plans that have had 
to file for change of control with the Federal Reserve System and plans 
for

[[Page 19350]]

sponsors who have converted corporate status to S-Corporations.
    In the early 1990s, TTCL was the court-appointed trustee for a bank 
that went into receivership by the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (FDIC) and completed the termination process of the plan 
with the FDIC as the sponsor. Further, as part of its services, Argent 
Trust has assisted many of its client plans in responding to inquiries 
and investigations made by the Department.
    22. Ann Marie Mills, Senior Vice President and Employee Benefits 
Manager for Argent Trust, is the officer assigned to represent the 
Segregated Trust Fund. Ms. Mills represents that she has 26 years of 
experience working with qualified plans and IRAs. In addition, Gary 
Moore, President of Argent Trust, has 30 years of trust experience, and 
D. Kyle McDonald, President and CEO of Argent Trust, has 26 years of 
trust experience.
    Argent Trust confirms that it is independent of, and does not have 
any other business relationship with, SPF, City Bank, or the LLC. In 
addition, Argent Trust confirms that it derives less than one percent 
of its gross annual income, based on the previous year's income tax 
return, from SPF or its affiliates.
    23. Pursuant to the Appointment Agreement, Argent Trust has the 
following responsibilities with respect to managing the Plan's Special 
Trust Fund: (a) To receive the LLC Interests on behalf of the Plan and 
to hold such interests until they are sold or otherwise conveyed; (b) 
to monitor the LLC Interests; (c) to receive any income derived from or 
distributions made with respect to the LLC Interests; (d) to exercise 
any rights of membership, including voting rights; (e) to invest the 
income derived from the LLC Interests as provided in the Appointment 
Agreement; (f) to pay any taxes or expenses assessed against the 
Special Trust Fund; (g) to appoint an independent appraiser to perform 
a valuation of the LLC Interests, with the understanding that more than 
one appraisal may be needed depending on the period between the filing 
of the application for a prohibited transaction exemption and the 
determination made by the Department; (h) to review and approve the 
independent appraisal of the LLC Interests; (i) to review the terms of 
any sale or other conveyance of the LLC Interests to confirm that they 
are consistent with an approval of the Plan's request for exemptive 
relief from the Department; and (j) to direct that the proceeds of any 
sale of the LLC Interests be transferred to the Primary Trustee, as 
defined in the Appointment Agreement (i.e., the City Bank trust 
department).\15\ In addition, to the extent that these functions and 
others listed in the Appointment Agreement would not in themselves have 
made Argent Trust a discretionary fiduciary with regard to the Plan's 
LLC Interests, Argent Trust has subsequently agreed to act as a 
discretionary fiduciary with respect to the Segregated Trust Fund. In 
that capacity, Argent Trust represents that it is its responsibility to 
determine if, when and on what terms the Plan's interests in the LLC 
may be sold, including approval of the purchaser.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Argent Trust represents that as set forth in its 
Appointment Agreement, except for its receipt of the LLC Interests 
on behalf of the Plan, it did not participate in the deliberations, 
discussions or other steps leading up to SPF's decision to declare a 
dividend of the LLC Interests or any of the antecedent decisions 
related to the transactions involving SPF or the LLC or the 
Property. Argent Trust further notes that it was engaged to receive 
the LLC Interests on behalf of the Plan, and hold such interests 
until the earlier of the disposition of the LLC Interests following 
a decision by the Department on the issuance of a prohibited 
transaction exemption or Argent Trust's resignation or removal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    24. In addition to performing its duties with respect to the 
management of the Plan's Special Trust Fund, as outlined in the 
Appointment Agreement described above, Argent Trust has reviewed the 
circumstances surrounding the Plan's acquisition of the LLC Interests 
and determined that it was in the best interests of the Plan 
participants to accept the Distribution of such LLC Interests. In a 
letter dated March 16, 2012, Argent Trust sets forth the following 
reasons for its opinion.
    First, Argent Trust states that it was not feasible for the 
Applicant to obtain a prohibited transaction exemption before the 
Distribution was made, and believes that it is unrealistic to think 
that other shareholders would have abided a delay in their receipt of 
the LLC Interests given SPF's legal obligation to make the Distribution 
and its willingness to do so immediately. Argent Trust also states that 
both tax consequences to the shareholders and corporate governance 
issues for SPF would have been implicated in such a delay. Further, 
Argent Trust opines that such a delay could only have been undertaken 
if the Plan had been treated substantially less favorably than other 
shareholders, which would have prejudiced participants who received an 
immediate financial benefit from the receipt of the LLC Interests. In 
addition, Argent Trust opines that whatever the LLC Interests were 
worth, they were clearly worth something, and that the participants 
gave up no rights or value to acquire these interests. As such, Argent 
Trust believes that rejecting or even delaying acceptance of the LLC 
Interests would have been demonstrably prejudicial to the participants.
    Second, Argent Trust states that the Plan's right to the receipt of 
the LLC Interests was inherent in its status as a shareholder of SPF, 
and to refuse acceptance of these LLC Interests would have violated 
such right. Further, Argent Trust represents that like other 
shareholders, the Plan had a legally and immediately enforceable right 
to receive the LLC Interests. In addition, Argent Trust represents that 
a rejection of the LLC Interests would have violated the Plan's right 
as a shareholder of SPF to receive the Distribution on the same basis 
as other SPF shareholders.
    Third, Argent Trust represents that the Plan's receipt of the LLC 
Interests did not cost the Plan anything, but a rejection of the LLC 
Interests would have resulted in a denial of opportunity to the Plan 
without offsetting benefits to the Plan. Argent Trust explains that the 
Distribution of LLC Interests was a unilateral transfer of a valuable 
property right for which the Plan participants gave no consideration. 
As such, Argent Trust states that rejecting the LLC Interests would 
have clearly denied Plan participants the opportunity to gain from the 
value of such interests and given them nothing in exchange. In 
addition, Argent Trust opines that to the participants, accepting the 
Distribution of LLC Interests was all upside and rejecting the LLC 
Interests would have been all downside. Further, Argent Trusts states 
that traditionally, trustees have had the authority to abandon 
burdensome or worthless property. However, Argent Trust states that in 
the absence of any indication that the LLC Interests would be 
burdensome or were worthless, Argent Trust had a duty to accept the 
assets on behalf of Plan participants. Argent Trust opines that the LLC 
Interests clearly could not have been so perceived at the time of 
receipt and have not become so since then.
    Accordingly, Argent Trust represents that acceptance of the LLC 
Interests was not only consistent with Argent Trust's fiduciary duties, 
it was required. In addition, Argent Trust believes that rejecting the 
LLC Interests would have been prejudicial to the best interests of Plan 
participants and contrary to Argent Trust's fiduciary duties.
    25. Argent Trust, acting as the Plan's qualified, independent 
fiduciary, with respect to the Special Trust Fund, represents that it 
has exercised its discretion to determine that the Redemption by the 
LLC of the LLC Interests is in the best interest and protective of the 
rights of the Plan

[[Page 19351]]

participants and beneficiaries. Specifically, Argent Trust opines that 
the proposed Redemption will allow the Plan to diversify its 
investments, improve its liquidity, and fulfill the Plan's primary 
purpose of investing in employer securities, and reduce its expenses. 
In addition, Argent Trust states that the Redemption will reduce the 
dependence of the Plan and its participants on a single enterprise and 
one locality.
    Moreover, Argent Trust states that a final decision on whether it 
is in the best interests of the Plan participants to retain or sell the 
LLC Interests cannot be made until the Department grants exemptive 
relief for the Redemption. However, Argent Trust states that, based on 
the facts existing at that time, if it determines that an investment in 
the LLC Interests is not in the best interests of the Plan, disposing 
of the LLC Interests would be consistent with the most recent amendment 
to the Funding and Investment Policy.
    Finally, Argent Trust represents that it will monitor the proposed 
Redemption through closing and delivery of funds to the Plan.

Request for Exemptive Relief

    26. The Applicant states that section 406(a)(1)(E) of the Act 
prohibits a fiduciary from causing a plan to engage in a transaction 
which the fiduciary knows (or should know) constitutes the acquisition 
on behalf of the plan, of any employer security in violation of section 
407(a). The Applicant believes that because the LLC was an affiliate of 
SPF for purposes of section 407(d)(7) of the Act at the time of the 
Distribution, the LLC Interests would constitute an ``employer 
security'' within the meaning of section 407(d)(1) of the Act but not a 
``qualifying employer security'' under section 407(d)(5) of the Act, 
inasmuch as the LLC Interests did not fall within any of the covered 
categories. The Applicant opines that while the LLC is no longer a 
party in interest to the Plan, it is an entity in which the SPF 
officers and directors may have interests that would affect their best 
judgment as Plan fiduciaries.
    Therefore, SPF states that exemptive relief is needed with respect 
to the acquisition and continued holding of the LLC Interests by the 
Plan to the extent there have been violations of sections 406(a), 
406(b)(1) and 406(b)(2), and section 407(a) of the Act.
    27. In addition, SPF represents that it is possible that the 
Redemption of the Plan's LLC Interests by the LLC will violate section 
406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act. In this regard, the Applicant notes 
that the LLC would no longer be considered a party in interest with 
respect to the Plan because City Bank and SPF have retained no interest 
in the LLC. However, the Applicant represents that the LLC Managers are 
participants in the Plan and Plan fiduciaries. Further, the Applicant 
states that the LLC Managers are members of the LLC in their individual 
capacities. Therefore, the Applicant believes that the Redemption of 
the Plan's LLC Interests by the LLC could affect the best judgment of 
these individuals as fiduciaries with respect to the Plan and it has 
requested exemptive relief from section 406(b)(1) and (b)(2) of the Act 
for this transaction.
    28. Accordingly, SPF requests an administrative exemption from the 
Department with respect to the Plan's acquisition and holding of the 
LLC Interests and the proposed redemption of the Plan's LLC Interests 
by the LLC.
    If granted, the exemption will be effective as of December 17, 
2008, with respect to the acquisition and holding by the Plan of the 
LLC Interests. In addition, this exemption will be effective as of the 
date the final exemption is granted with respect to the LLC's 
Redemption of the Plan's LLC Interests.

The Appraisals

    29. The Plan's LLC Interests have been appraised by John Seright, 
CPA/ABV, CFFA, and Woody Boyd, CPA/ABV, CVA (the LLC Appraisers) of 
Robinson Burdette Martin & Seright, L.L.P. (RBMS). RBMS is a full-
service public accounting firm located in Lubbock, Texas. In a letter 
dated May 16, 2011, the LLC Appraisers certify that the valuation was 
performed on a basis of non-advocacy, that they have no present or 
contemplated interest in the property valued and have no personal bias 
with respect to the parties involved. Further, in a letter dated August 
1, 2011, RMBS represents that it has derived less than 1% of its annual 
income from the parties in interest and related affiliates, which 
include SPF, City Bank, the LLC and the SPF Directors, for the years 
2009 and 2010.
    In connection with rendering this valuation, the LLC Appraisers 
considered, among other things, the following: (a) The Company 
Agreement of SPFI Investment Group, LLC dated December 10, 2008; (b) 
unaudited (``management prepared'') balance sheets and income 
statements; (c) restricted use real estate appraisal report; (d) 
economic statistics published by the government or other sources; and 
(e) information provided by SPF management.
    30. The Property underlying the LLC Interests has been appraised by 
Gerald A. Teel, MAI, CRE and Michael G. Divin, Managing Partner 
(together, the Property Appraisers) of Blosser Appraisal (a Division of 
Gerald A. Teel Company, Inc.). Blosser Appraisal is located in Lubbock, 
Texas. Blosser Appraisal represents that it has derived less than 1% of 
its annual income from the parties in interest \16\ with respect to the 
Plan and related affiliates for the years 2010 and 2011. In an 
independent appraisal dated April 27, 2011 (the 2011 Property 
Appraisal), the Property Appraisers updated a December 30, 2008 
independent appraisal (the 2008 Property Appraisal) that was prepared 
by their firm, in which the Property's leased fee value and fair market 
rental value were placed at $18,100,000 and $23.50 per square foot, 
respectively, as of December 30, 2008. Using the Income Approach to 
valuation, the Property Appraisers determined that the Property had a 
leased fee value of $18,130,000 and a fair market rent value of $23.50 
per square foot, as of April 27, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ Blosser Appraisal lists SPF, City Bank, the LLC and the SPF 
Directors as parties in interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    31. Taking into consideration the 2011 Property Appraisal, among 
the other factors listed above, in an independent appraisal dated May 
16, 2011 (the 2011 LLC Appraisal), the LLC Appraisers updated a May 17, 
2010 independent appraisal (the 2010 LLC Appraisal) that was prepared 
by their firm, in which the Plan's LLC Interests were valued at 
$826,868, as of March 31, 2010. Using the Cost (i.e., Net Asset Value) 
Approach to valuation (with adjustments for lack of control and lack of 
marketability of the LLC Interests), the LLC Appraisers concluded that 
the Plan's LLC Interests, if valued on a ``Minority/Non-Managing 
Membership'' basis, had a fair market value of $1,036,665 as of March 
31, 2011. The LLC Appraisers will update the 2011 LLC Appraisal on the 
date of the Redemption.
    32. In addition, Joe Rainer of Argent Property Services, a separate 
subsidiary of AFG that provides support to Argent Trust accounts in 
matters of property management, among other things, has reviewed the 
appraisal reports prepared by the LLC Appraisers. Argent Trust 
represents that Mr. Rainer has 35 years of experience in this area, and 
that prior to joining AFG, Mr. Rainer served as Manager of Minerals and 
Taxes for Willamete Industries, Inc. Mr. Rainer states that the methods 
and procedures used in determining the fair market value of the Plan's 
LLC Interests are sound, accurate, and follow the

[[Page 19352]]

accepted methods for business valuations. Mr. Rainer further states 
that, based on the data he reviewed, he agrees with the LLC Appraisers 
estimated value for the Plan's LLC Interests.

The Redemption

    33. On the basis of the foregoing, within ninety (90) days after 
the publication of the notice granting the final exemption in the 
Federal Register, the LLC will redeem the LLC Interests held by the 
Plan for the greater of $1,036,655 or the fair market value of the LLC 
Interests on the date that the Redemption occurs. The proceeds of the 
Redemption will be reallocated by Employee Incentive Plans, Inc., a 
third party administrator, among Plan participants to their Other 
Investments Accounts in proportion to each such participant's ownership 
of LLC Interests at the time of the Redemption.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ The Plan holds the LLC Interests as a pooled investment. 
Each Plan participant's `share' of the pooled investment in the LLC 
is generally based on the ratio of SPF stock allocated to the 
participant's account to the total number of allocated SPF stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    34. In summary, it is represented that the transactions satisfied 
or will satisfy the statutory criteria for an exemption under section 
408(a) of the Act because:
    (a) The Plan's acquisition and holding of the LLC Interests 
occurred in connection with the Distribution, wherein the Plan acquired 
the LLC Interests automatically and without any action on its part.
    (b) The Plan's acquisition of the LLC Interests resulted from an 
independent act of SPF as a corporate entity for business reasons which 
did not involve the Plan. As such, all shareholders of SPF, including 
the Plan, were treated in the same manner.
    (c) The Plan paid no fees or commissions in connection with the 
acquisition and holding of the Interests.
    (d) Within ninety (90) days after publication of the notice 
granting the final exemption in the Federal Register, the LLC will 
redeem the LLC Interests held by the Plan for no less than the greater 
of $1,036,665 or the fair market value of the LLC Interests on the date 
that the Redemption occurs.
    (e) The Redemption will be a one-time sale of the LLC Interests for 
cash.
    (f) The terms and conditions of the Redemption will be at least as 
favorable to the Plan as those obtainable in an arm's length 
transaction with an unrelated party.
    (g) The Plan will pay no commissions, costs or other expenses in 
connection with the Redemption.
    (h) An independent fiduciary has approved the Redemption and will 
monitor such transaction on behalf of the Plan.

Notice to Interested Persons

    The Applicant will provide notice of the proposed exemption within 
ten (10) days of the date of publication of the notice of proposed 
exemption in the Federal Register to all interested persons who are 
actively employed Plan participants by electronic mail with receipt of 
delivery requested, and to all other interested persons via first class 
mail. Such notice will include a copy of the proposed exemption, as 
published in the Federal Register, and a supplemental statement, as 
required pursuant to 29 CFR 2570.43(b)(2). The supplemental statement 
will inform interested persons of their right to comment on and/or to 
request a hearing with respect to the proposed exemption. Comments 
regarding the proposed exemption and requests for a public hearing are 
due within forty (40) days of the date of publication of the notice of 
pendency in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anna Mpras Vaughan of the 
Department, telephone (202) 693-8565. (This is not a toll-free number.)

TIB Financial Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan With 401(k) 
Provisions (the Plan)

Located in Naples, Florida

    [Application No. D-11668]

Proposed Exemption

    The Department is considering granting an exemption under the 
authority of section 408(a) of the Act and section 4975(c)(2) of the 
Code and in accordance with the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 
2570, Subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990).\18\ If the 
exemption is granted, the restrictions of sections 406(a)(1)(A) and 
(E), 406(a)(2), 406(b)(1), 406(b)(2), and 407(a) of the Act and the 
sanctions resulting from the application of section 4975(c)(1)(A) and 
(E) of the Code, shall not apply, effective December 17, 2010 through 
January 18, 2011, to: (1) The acquisition of certain stock rights (the 
Rights) by the Plan in connection with, and under the terms and 
conditions of, a Rights offering (the Offering) by TIB Financial Corp. 
(TIB or the Applicant), the Plan sponsor and a party in interest with 
respect to the Plan, and (2) the holding of the Rights by the Plan 
during the subscription period of the Offering; provided that the 
following conditions were met:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ For purposes of this proposed exemption, references to the 
provisions of Title I of the Act, unless otherwise specified, refer 
also to the corresponding provisions of the Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) The receipt of the Rights by the Plan occurred pursuant to Plan 
provisions for individually directed investments of such accounts, in 
connection with the Offering, and was made available by TIB on the same 
terms to all shareholders of record (the Shareholders) of TIB's common 
stock (Common Stock) as of 4:01 p.m., New York City time, on July 12, 
2010 (the Record Date);
    (b) The acquisition of the Rights by the Plan resulted from an 
independent act of TIB as a corporate entity, and all holders of the 
Rights, including the Plan, were treated in the same manner with 
respect to such acquisition;
    (c) All Shareholders of Common Stock, including the Plan, received 
the same proportionate number of Rights based on the number of shares 
of Common Stock held by such Shareholders;
    (d) All decisions regarding the Rights held by the Plan were made 
by the individual Plan participants (Participants) whose accounts in 
the Plan received the Rights pursuant to the Offering, in accordance 
with the provisions under the Plan for individually-directed investment 
of such account; and
    (e) The Plan did not pay any fees or commissions in connection with 
the acquisition and or holding of the Rights.
    Effective Date: This proposed exemption, if granted, will be 
effective from December 17, 2010, through and including January 18, 
2011.

Summary of Facts and Representations

Background

    1. TIB is a bank holding company organized in February 1996 under 
the laws of the State of Florida with its principal place of business 
in Naples, Florida. Its operating subsidiaries consist of TIB Bank 
(which commenced its commercial banking operations in Islamorada, 
Florida in 1974) and Naples Capital Advisors, Inc. (which commenced its 
investment advisory services in Naples, Florida in 2007). TIB and TIB 
Bank have 27 full-service banking offices in Florida which are located 
in Monroe, Miami-Dade, Collier, Lee, and Sarasota counties. TIB Bank 
serves over 60,000 customers in these five counties. As of September 
30, 2010, TIB Bank had approximately $1.74 billion in total assets, 
$1.33 billion in total deposits, $1.02 billion in total loans and $177 
million in shareholders' equity. TIB's investment advisory firm, Naples 
Capital Advisors, Inc., is a Registered Investment Advisor under

[[Page 19353]]

the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 that manages assets for high net 
worth clients.
    2. TIB sponsors the Plan for the benefit of its employees and the 
employees of its subsidiaries and such individuals' beneficiaries. The 
Plan is an employee stock ownership plan containing a 401(k) cash or 
deferred arrangement under section 401(a) of the Code and is designed 
to be an employee stock ownership plan under section 4975(e)(7) of the 
Code. The Plan provides for regular pre-tax employee 401(k) 
contributions and employer-paid matching and profit-sharing 
contributions. According to the Applicant, as of January 27, 2012, the 
Plan had 377 Participants and approximately $6,498,826 in net assets. 
The Plan allows its Participants to self-direct the investment of their 
accounts and is intended to operate in accordance with section 404(c) 
of the Act. Pursuant to a trust agreement (the Trust Agreement) between 
TIB and Reliance Trust Company, Inc. (the Trustee), dated April 16, 
2002, the Trustee serves as the Plan's trustee.
    3. The Plan's investment options include a wide variety of mutual 
funds from which Participants may choose to invest. In addition, 
Participants may invest amounts held in their Plan accounts in the TIB 
Financial Corp. Employer Stock Fund (the TIB Stock Fund). The TIB Stock 
Fund allows Participants to invest in shares of the same class of 
Common Stock that is available to all other investors. Furthermore, the 
Plan's terms require that the TIB Stock Fund will be offered as an 
investment option, but investment in that fund by Participants is 
entirely voluntary.
    4. The Applicant explains that neither TIB nor its subsidiaries 
contribute Common Stock to the Plan. Instead, all employer 
contributions are made in cash, and Common Stock is acquired for the 
Plan only as a result of Participant-directed investment decisions. The 
Applicant explains that, upon the direction from a Participant to 
invest in the TIB Stock Fund, the Trustee purchases the Common Stock on 
the open market at the prevailing market price. The Trustee acts only 
as a directed trustee with respect to all Plan investments and, as 
such, is required to carry out Participants' directions regarding 
investing in the TIB Stock Fund.
    The Plan's administrator, Ingham Retirement Group, has the 
responsibility of coordinating with the Trustee as to the 
administrative procedures to implement Participant investment decisions 
regarding Common Stock but otherwise has no authority with respect to 
the TIB Stock Fund. Upon the settlement of the trade implementing a 
Participant's direction to invest in the TIB Stock Fund, the Trustee 
becomes the Shareholder of record and the Participant becomes the 
beneficial owner. With respect to voting, the Plan provides for full 
pass-through voting of Common Stock to the Participants.
    5. As of December 17, 2010, the date of commencement of the 
Offering (the Commencement Date), there were 371 active Participants 
and 71 terminated Participants who still had funds remaining in the 
Plan. The Plan's assets totaled $8,302,093, and 167 Participants held 
shares in the TIB Stock Fund (38 of these 167 were terminated 
Participants who still had funds remaining in the Plan at the time). 
Therefore, as of the Commencement Date, the Plan held 4,477 shares of 
Common Stock, or approximately 0.04% of the then outstanding shares of 
Common Stock, with a value of approximately $154,457 based on its 
closing price on the NASDAQ of $34.50, or approximately 2% of Plan 
assets.

The Investment Agreement

    6. On June 29, 2010, TIB entered into an Investment Agreement (the 
Investment Agreement) with TIB Bank and North American Financial 
Holdings, Inc. (NAFH), an unrelated third party. According to the 
Applicant, at the time the Investment Agreement was entered into, TIB 
was facing financial challenges and potential regulatory actions as a 
result of the credit crisis and therefore was pursuing strategic 
alternatives to recapitalize its banking subsidiary. The Applicant 
explains that the potential regulatory action involved the delisting of 
TIB's common stock from the NASDAQ, since at the time, TIB's stock 
price had fallen below the NASDAQ's $1.00 minimum required bid price. 
Thus, TIB determined that a potential investment by NAFH would permit 
TIB to obtain needed capital and continue to operate and was therefore 
in the best interests of its shareholders and other constituencies.
    7. On September 30, 2010, TIB completed the issuance and sale to 
NAFH of 7,000,000 shares of Common Stock, 70,000 shares of mandatorily 
convertible participating voting Series B Preferred Stock (the 
Preferred Stock) and a warrant to purchase up to 11,666,667 shares of 
Common Stock of TIB for aggregate consideration of $175 million (the 
Warrant). The consideration consisted of approximately $162.8 million 
in cash and a contribution worth approximately $12.2 million of all 
37,000 outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock previously issued 
to the United States Department of the Treasury under the Troubled 
Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program (TARP) and a related 
warrant to purchase shares of Common Stock (the TARP Warrant), which 
NAFH purchased directly from the Treasury. The Series A Preferred Stock 
and the TARP Warrant were retired by TIB on September 30, 2010 and are 
no longer outstanding. The 70,000 shares of Preferred Stock received by 
NAFH automatically converted into an aggregate of 4,666,667 shares of 
Common Stock on December 1, 2010. The Warrant is exercisable, in whole 
or in part, and from time to time, from September 30, 2010 to March 30, 
2012, at an exercise price of $15.00 per share, subject to anti-
dilution adjustments.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ The Applicant states that, as of February 1, 2012, the 
Warrant had not been exercised.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a result of the NAFH investment, NAFH owned approximately 99% of 
TIB's Common Stock, and TIB became a controlled subsidiary of NAFH. 
Further, the operating entities below NAFH and TIB have all been merged 
so TIB is an intermediate holding company.
    8. Furthermore, following the closing of the sale to NAFH of Common 
Stock and the Preferred Stock and TIB's issuance of the Warrant to 
NAFH, the Investment Agreement provided that TIB would commence a stock 
rights offering. According to the Applicant, the Offering was conducted 
in order to raise equity capital and provide existing Shareholders with 
the opportunity to increase their ownership of shares of Common Stock 
following the completion of the investment by NAFH.

The Offering

    9. Pursuant to the terms of the Offering, which commenced on 
December 17, 2010, TIB distributed at no charge, nontransferable Rights 
to Shareholders, in the aggregate, to purchase up to 1,488,792 shares 
of Common Stock. Each Shareholder received ten Rights for each share of 
Common Stock held as of the Record Date (i.e., July 12, 2010). Of the 
Participants who held shares in the TIB Stock Fund as of the Record 
Date, 183 received rights to purchase Common Stock in the Offering. Of 
these 183 Participants, 49 were terminated Participants who still had 
funds remaining in the Plan at the time.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The Applicant notes that the difference between the number 
of Participants holding Common Stock in their Plan accounts as of 
the Record Date (183) and the Commencement Date (167) was caused by 
terminated employees who either had their Plan account balances paid 
out or rolled over to a different plan (a New Plan) during such 
interim period.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 19354]]

    10. Each Right held by a Shareholder entitled the Shareholder to 
purchase one one-hundredth (1/100th) of a share of Common Stock at a 
subscription price of $15.00 per full share (the Subscription Price). 
In this regard, the Applicant explains that the Investment Agreement 
required the Subscription Price to be $0.15 per share of Common Stock, 
which, adjusted for a 100-to-1 reverse stock split that TIB effected 
after the close of business on December 15, 2010, constituted the 
$15.00 per share Subscription Price in the Offering. According to the 
Applicant, the Subscription Price was not necessarily related to TIB's 
book value, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or 
the future market value of Common Stock, but rather was the price 
negotiated and established in the Investment Agreement.
    11. According to the Applicant, in connection with the Offering, 
TIB did not charge any fees or sales commissions to issue Rights to a 
Shareholder or to issue shares of Common Stock to a Shareholder if the 
Shareholder exercised his or her Rights. The Applicant states further 
that there was no over-subscription privilege associated with the 
Offering and no party provided a backstop for the Offering. Finally, 
the Applicant notes that no Shareholder had the opportunity to purchase 
additional shares not purchased by other Shareholders pursuant to such 
other Shareholders' subscription privileges. A Shareholder was entitled 
to exercise their subscription privilege for some or all of his or her 
Rights, or the Shareholder could choose not to exercise any portion of 
their subscription privilege.
    12. The Applicant states that the Offering and all Rights were 
originally scheduled to expire at 5 p.m., New York City time, on 
January 10, 2011 (the Original Shareholder Expiration Date). However, 
pursuant to the terms of the Offering, TIB extended the Offering until 
5 p.m., New York City time, January 18, 2011 (the Shareholder 
Expiration Date). According to the Applicant, therefore, Shareholders 
were informed that they would need to complete their subscription 
rights election form properly and deliver it, along with the full 
payment amount in respect of the number of Rights they wished to 
exercise at the Subscription Price (the Subscription Payment), to the 
subscription agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (the 
Subscription Agent) before 5 p.m. on the Shareholder Expiration Date. 
All required documents and payment were required to be received prior 
to the Shareholder Expiration Date. After 5 p.m. on the Shareholder 
Expiration Date, all unexercised subscription rights became null and 
void. Other than the extension of the Original Shareholder Expiration 
Date, the Applicant states that all of the Offering terms described in 
TIB's prospectus dated December 17, 2010 remained the same and applied 
during the subscription period of the Offering (including the extension 
thereof).
    13. The Applicant states that the shares of Common Stock issued in 
connection with the Offering are currently listed on the NASDAQ Capital 
Market, and have been so listed since they were issued in connection 
with the Offering.\21\ The Rights themselves, however, could not be 
sold, transferred or assigned and, consequently, were not listed for 
trading on any exchange. The Applicant represents that the TIB Board of 
Directors did not make any recommendations to the Shareholders 
regarding whether they should exercise their Rights but urged 
Shareholders to make independent decisions based on their assessment of 
TIB's business and the risk factors associated with a rights offering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ The Applicant notes that, as of the Commencement Date, the 
price of Common Stock was listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, 
but due to non-compliance with certain listing standards, NASDAQ 
granted TIB's request for its listing to be moved to the NASDAQ 
Capital Market, which occurred on January 27, 2011, several days 
after the January 18, 2011 closing date of the Offering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    14. According to the Applicant, since the Plan held shares of 
Common Stock on the Record Date, the Plan and its Participants were 
required to be treated the same as the other Shareholders in the 
Offering. Furthermore, to comply with Florida law, TIB was required to 
distribute Rights to all Shareholders on a pro rata basis, and the 
Applicant states that it could not issue Rights to some Shareholders, 
but not to others. Had the Plan been denied participation in the 
Offering, the Applicant notes that Participants who owned Common Stock 
in the TIB Stock Fund as of the Record Date would not have been treated 
equally to Shareholders outside the Plan, and they would have been 
denied the opportunity to purchase additional shares at the 
Subscription Price.
    Consequently, in the Offering, the Plan received Rights based on 
the number of shares of Common Stock that it held as of the Record 
Date, and in turn, the Rights were allocated to Participants based on 
the number of shares of Common Stock that were credited to 
Participants' Plan accounts as of the Record Date. The Plan held the 
Rights until they either were exercised by Participants or expired on 
the Shareholder Expiration Date. The Plan accounts of Participants who 
had invested in the TIB Stock Fund on the Record Date were allocated 
the same proportion of Rights and the same information regarding the 
Offering as other Shareholders.

Request for Exemptive Relief

    15. Although the Rights satisfy the definition of ``employer 
securities'' under section 407(d)(1) of the Act, i.e., ``security[ies] 
issued by an employer of employees covered by the plan, or by an 
affiliate of such employer,'' the Applicant states that the Rights are 
not ``qualifying employer securities'' within the meaning of section 
407(d)(5) of the Act. Section 407(d)(5) defines the term ``qualifying 
employer security'' as an employer security which is stock, a 
marketable obligation, or an interest in a publicly traded partnership 
(provided such partnership is an existing partnership as defined in the 
Code). Under section 407(a)(1) of the Act, a plan may not acquire or 
hold any ``employer security'' which is not a ``qualifying employer 
security.'' Moreover, section 406(a)(1)(E) of the Act prohibits the 
acquisition, on behalf of a plan, of any ``employer security in 
violation of section 407(a)(1) of the Act. Finally, section 406(a)(2) 
of the Act prohibits a fiduciary who has the authority or discretion to 
control or manage the assets of a plan to permit the plan to hold any 
``employer security'' that violates section 407(a) of the Act. 
According to the Applicant, a prohibited transaction occurs either 
directly or indirectly as a result of the Plan holding Rights that are 
not ``qualifying employer securities'' and making them available to 
Participants.
    Therefore, the Applicant requests an administrative exemption from 
the Department, effective December 17, 2010 until January 18, 2011, 
with respect to the acquisition and holding of the Rights by the Plan.

Exercise of the Rights

    16. Pursuant to the terms of the Offering, each Right held by a 
Shareholder entitled the Shareholder to purchase one one-hundredth (1/
100th) of a share of Common Stock at the Subscription Price of $15.00 
per full share, which was below the public trading price of Common 
Stock at the close of the market on the

[[Page 19355]]

Commencement Date.\22\ The Applicant explains that, for example, if a 
Shareholder owned 955 pre-split shares of Common Stock on the Record 
Date, a Shareholder would receive 9,550 Rights and would have the right 
to purchase 95 shares of Common Stock (rounded down from 95.5 shares, 
with the total Subscription Payment being adjusted accordingly) at the 
Subscription Price, subject to an overall beneficial ownership limit of 
4.9%.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ On December 17, 2010, the closing trading price of Common 
Stock was $34.50, as listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    17. As noted above, the Applicant represents that the Shareholders 
were permitted to exercise all, some or none of their Rights, but 
Shareholders could only exercise Rights in whole numbers of shares. 
Fractional shares of Common Stock that resulted from the exercise of 
the subscription privilege were eliminated by rounding down to the 
nearest whole share, with the total Subscription Payment being adjusted 
accordingly. Any excess Subscription Payments received by the 
Subscription Agent were returned, without interest, as soon as 
practicable.
    18. According to the Applicant, the Rights were nontransferable, 
and any Rights that were not exercised by a Shareholder simply expired. 
Furthermore, an election to exercise a Right was irrevocable once made. 
The Applicant states that TIB did not charge any fees or sales 
commissions to issue the Rights or to issue shares to those who 
exercised their Rights. However, if Shareholders exercised Rights 
through a broker or other holder of their shares of Common Stock, the 
Shareholders were responsible for paying any fees that person may have 
charged. However, no fees or expenses were paid by the Plan.
    The Applicant explains that, to exercise Rights, a Shareholder 
generally was required to properly complete a subscription rights 
election form and deliver it, along with the full Subscription Payment, 
to the Subscription Agent, before 5 p.m., New York City time, on the 
Shareholder Expiration Date of January 18, 2011. Further, Shareholders 
holding their shares in street name or through brokers exercised their 
rights through their brokers.
    19. However, as explained by the Applicant, the process by which a 
Participant could exercise their Rights was different from that of 
other Shareholders.\23\ The Applicant states that Participants were 
mailed a special notice entitled ``Instructions for Participants in the 
TIB Financial Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) 
Provisions--Important Information on the TIB Financial Corp. Rights 
Offering,'' (the 401(k) Participant Instructions) that, in nontechnical 
language, described the Offering and provided instructions to 
Participants who wanted to exercise the Rights that were allocated to 
their Plan accounts. Furthermore, the Participants were provided with a 
special election form to exercise their subscription rights, called the 
``TIB Financial Corp. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) 
Provisions Non-Transferable Subscription Rights Election Form,'' (the 
401(k) Participant Election Form) and a prospectus that was provided to 
all Shareholders that described the Offering in more detail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ The Applicant states that each Participant who terminated 
employment and either had their Plan account balance paid out or 
rolled over to a New Plan, was sent their Rights by TIB to the 
address that such Participant directed their Plan distribution be 
sent. According to the Applicant, it did not see any impediments to 
allowing Participants whose accounts were rolled over or paid out 
during the period between the Record Date and the Commencement Date, 
to participate in the Offering, and TIB implemented a process to 
treat such Participants in the same manner as all other Shareholders 
(subject, if applicable, to the New Plan's administrative 
procedures).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    20. The Applicant explains that the 401(k) Participant Instructions 
and the prospectus were intended to provide Participants with the 
information necessary to understand the Offering. In addition, the 
Applicant states that the 401(k) Participant Election Form was intended 
to provide Participants with the information they required in order to 
file the election properly and to ensure that the Participant's 
directions with respect to the exercise of Rights were clear enough to 
avoid clerical or administrative problems.
    21. Accordingly, if a Participant held shares of Common Stock in 
his or her Plan account as of the Record Date, the Participant was 
entitled to exercise the Rights with respect to those shares of Common 
Stock by electing what amount (if any) of Rights that he or she wanted 
to exercise by properly completing the 401(k) Participant Election Form 
described above. The Applicant explains that a Participant was required 
to return his or her properly completed 401(k) Participant Election 
Form to the Ingham Retirement Group by 5 p.m., New York City time on 
January 12, 2011 (the Participant Expiration Date). According to the 
Applicant, the Participant Expiration Date was six business days 
earlier than the Shareholder Expiration Date, because the Trustee, the 
Subscription Agent for the Offering and the Plan's recordkeeper, 
trustee, custodian and the clearing agency for the Offering required 
additional time to process Participants' elections to exercise their 
Rights, tabulate and confirm the results, liquidate the Participants' 
funds, confirm the orders and the availability of the funds and remit 
payment to purchase the shares.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ The Applicant states that the original expiration date for 
Participants was January 4, 2011 (the Original Participant 
Expiration Date), but the expiration date was later extended to the 
Participant Expiration Date, January 12, 2011, when the Offering was 
extended.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    22. According to the Applicant, if a Participant's 401(k) 
Participant Election Form was not received by the Participant 
Expiration Date, any election to exercise the Participant's Rights held 
in his or her Plan account was not effective and any Rights credited to 
the Participant's Plan account expired. The Applicant states that, 
prior to the extension of the subscription period of the Offering, if a 
Participant elected to exercise some or all of the Rights in his or her 
Plan account, the Participant was also required to ensure that the 
total amount of the funds required for such exercise had been allocated 
to the Fidelity Retirement Money Market Fund (the Money Market Fund) in 
his or her Plan account by 4 p.m., New York City time, on January 4, 
2011 and such amount remained in the Money Market Fund until liquidated 
into cash (which occurred on January 6, 2011). Pursuant to the 
extension of the subscription period of the Offering, Participants were 
given a second chance to exercise their Rights,\25\ and the total 
amount of the funds required for such exercise in the extended 
subscription period was required to have been allocated to the Money 
Market Fund in a Participant's Plan account by 4 p.m., New York City 
time, on January 12, 2011. The Applicant states that, during the 
Offering, a total of thirty Participants exercised their Rights to 
purchase shares of Common Stock.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ The Applicant notes that, because the extension of the 
subscription period of the Offering was announced after the Original 
Participant Expiration Date had occurred, Participants in the Plan 
who had already submitted 401(k) Participant Election Forms electing 
to subscribe and allocated sufficient funds to the Money Market Fund 
were deemed to have irrevocably exercised their right to participate 
in the Offering as of the Original Participant Expiration Date. Upon 
the extension of the subscription period of the Offering, 
Participants who had not yet elected to participate were given a 
second chance to make their election to participate, up to the 
Participant Expiration Date, but no Participant who elected to 
participate upon the Original Participant Expiration Date was 
allowed to withdraw their participation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    23. The Applicant states that Participants were instructed not to 
remit any payments to the Subscription Agent. Instead, Participants 
were

[[Page 19356]]

required to have enough money available in their Money Market Fund 
accounts by the Original Participant Expiration Date and the 
Participant Expiration Date to satisfy the Subscription Payment for the 
Rights they elected to exercise. The Applicant notes that, by taking 
funds from Participants' Money Market Funds, the Trustee effectively 
allowed Participants to choose which of their Plan investments they 
wanted to use to pay for their shares. In this regard, the Applicant 
explains, only the Participants' Money Market Fund accounts would be 
liquidated, rather than a pro-rata portion of each of the funds in 
which Participants were invested.\26\ The Applicant explains further 
that, because Participants were initially not likely to have sufficient 
funds in their Money Market Fund accounts, the 401(k) Participant 
Instructions provided detailed instructions about how the Participant 
could transfer money into the Money Market Fund from the other 
investment funds held in the Participant's Plan account. Thus, 
Participants were not forced to liquidate a portion of every fund in 
which they wished to remain invested at their current levels, but could 
select the portion(s) of particular funds to liquidate (with the 
exception of their Money Market Funds, which was used to pay for the 
exercise of the Rights).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ The Applicant notes that the terms of the Offering 
specifically provided for this process, and such process is also 
consistent with the terms of the Plan provisions for individually-
directed investment of the Participant account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    24. Accordingly, the Applicant explains, as soon as practicable 
after each of the Original Participant Expiration Time and the 
Participant Expiration Time, the Money Market Fund accounts of the 
Participants exercising rights \27\ were liquidated to generate funds 
sufficient to cover the Participants' Subscription Payments for their 
Rights.\28\ The Applicant notes that, if a Participant did not have 
enough money in their Money Market Fund, the Trustee (as instructed by 
TIB) did not exercise that Participant's Rights. Once the Trustee was 
finished liquidating funds after the Participant Expiration Time, it 
lifted the freeze on the Money Market Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ The Applicant states that the reason behind freezing the 
Participants' Money Market Fund accounts was to prevent the 
Participants from moving money out of that fund after the Original 
Participant Expiration Date and Participant Expiration Date lapsed 
but before the Trustee could liquidate it.
    \28\ Funds from the liquidation of the Money Market Fund after 
the Original Participant Expiration Date were held in cash at an 
account at Fidelity Institutional, the custodian for the account.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    25. The Applicant states further that the Offering provided that no 
Rights held by the Plan would have been exercised if the per share 
closing price of Common Stock on Friday, January 14, 2011 (one business 
day before the Shareholder Expiration Date) \29\ of $19.51, as reported 
by the NASDAQ (the Closing Price), was not greater than or equal to the 
Subscription Price.\30\ In this regard, pursuant to the Letter 
Agreement, dated December 23, 2010 between TIB and the Trustee, TIB was 
required to notify the Trustee in writing (the Final Instruction) (i) 
of the elections of Participants, (ii) whether the Closing Price on 
January 14, 2011 was equal to or exceeded $15.00 per share and (iii) of 
TIB's direction that the Trustee either: (a) Exercise that number of 
Rights held by the Trustee pursuant to the Trust Agreement on behalf of 
the Plan, and to purchase that number of shares of Common Stock, set 
forth in the Final Instruction; or (b) not exercise any Rights pursuant 
to the Rights Offering on behalf of the Plan or Participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ Monday, January 17, 2011 was a holiday (Birthday of Martin 
Luther King, Jr.).
    \30\ As noted above, the Subscription Price was equal to $15.00 
per share.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    26. If the Trustee exercised the Participants' Rights, the Trustee 
was required to direct the custodian for the Plan to remit the 
Participants' money, obtained from the liquidation of the Money Market 
Fund accounts of the applicable exercising Participants, to the 
Subscription Agent. The Subscription Agent then exercised the Rights 
held by the Plan, issued the shares of Common Stock to the Plan, and 
the Trustee credited the Participants' TIB Stock Fund with the acquired 
shares.

The Merits of the Transaction

    27. The Applicant states that the requested exemption is 
administratively feasible, because there was no need or reason for the 
Department to have monitored or supervised the covered transactions. 
The Applicant explains that, under the Investment Agreement, TIB was 
obligated to undertake (and did undertake) the Offering to allow its 
Shareholders to purchase additional shares of Common Stock at the 
stated Subscription Price, which was below the stock's market price. 
Furthermore, according to the Applicant, it was not feasible for TIB to 
obtain an individual prohibited transaction exemption before proceeding 
with the Offering within the timeframe set forth in the Investment 
Agreement.
    28. The Applicant states that the requested exemption is in the 
interest of the Plan and its Participants and beneficiaries because the 
Participants had an opportunity, provided at no cost, to purchase 
Common Stock if they believed the terms of a purchase were favorable. 
Furthermore, according to the Applicant, the investment opportunity 
that was provided to Participants resulted in an immediate financial 
gain for the Participants who elected to exercise their Rights in the 
Offering, as they were given the opportunity to purchase shares of 
Common Stock worth $19.51 per share at a price of $15.00 per share. 
Therefore, according to the Applicant, proceeding with the exemption 
transaction allowed the Participants who chose to participate in the 
Offering to purchase additional TIB shares below the market price, at 
an immediate gain of $4.51 per share.
    Furthermore, the Applicant represents that TIB and the Plan entered 
into the covered transactions because not doing so would have violated 
the legal rights that Participants have as investors in Common Stock 
and as holders of Common Stock (through their Plan accounts) by, in 
effect, converting the Common Stock they held in their Plan accounts 
into a different, and inferior, class of Common Stock that did not have 
subscription rights under the Offering. Additionally, the Applicant 
states that, because the Plan and its Participants received the Rights 
at no cost, denial of the exemption would cause the Participants to 
lose an economic opportunity without any offsetting benefit. Further, 
to the extent other Shareholders exercised their Rights at below market 
prices, the Applicant notes that such exercise would be dilutive of the 
holdings of Participants.
    The Applicant suggests further that denying the Plan the ability to 
participate in the Offering would have raised questions whether other 
violations of the Act had occurred, since the Participants had 
previously purchased their shares at full value, but as a result of 
being denied the ability to participate, they would have obviously 
overpaid for those shares. Furthermore, if TIB had excluded the Plan 
and its Participants from the Offering, TIB's other Shareholders would 
have received a benefit at a cost to the Plan and the Participants, 
thus receiving the benefit of not incurring the dilution of their 
shares when Participants participated in the Offering. Finally, 
according to the Applicant, omitting the Plan from the Offering would 
have violated the terms of the Plan and Trust Agreement which provided 
that distributions with respect

[[Page 19357]]

to shares of Common Stock should be passed through to the accounts of 
Participants.
    29. The Applicant states that the requested exemption is protective 
of the rights of Participants and beneficiaries because they had the 
opportunity, at their own discretion, to participate in the Offering on 
the same terms as every other Shareholder. The Applicant stresses that 
Participants and their beneficiaries had no obligation to exercise 
their Rights, and in fact could not exercise their Rights if the 
Subscription Price was below the Closing Price on January 14, 2011 (any 
Rights not exercised by the Participants simply expired). The Applicant 
states that the terms of the Offering were described to the 
Participants in clearly written communications, namely the 401(k) 
Participant Instructions and the 401(k) Participant Election Form, and 
that the decision by Participants to exercise Rights held in their Plan 
Accounts of the Participants in the Offering was strictly voluntary. 
Finally, the Applicant notes that neither TIB nor any of the Plan 
fiduciaries placed any pressure on Participants to exercise their 
Rights in the Offering or otherwise attempted to influence their 
decision, and the Offering was conducted in a manner which did not 
prejudice the Participants.

Summary

    30. In summary, the Applicant represents that the covered 
transactions satisfied the statutory requirements for an exemption 
under section 408(a) of the Act because:
    (a) The receipt of the Rights by the Plan occurred pursuant to Plan 
provisions for individually directed investments of such accounts, in 
connection with the Offering, and was made available by TIB on the same 
terms to all Shareholders of Common Stock as of the Record Date;
    (b) The acquisition of the Rights by the Plan resulted from an 
independent act of TIB as a corporate entity, and all holders of the 
Rights, including the Plan, were treated in the same manner with 
respect to such acquisition;
    (c) All Shareholders of Common Stock, including the Plan, received 
the same proportionate number of Rights based on the number of shares 
of Common Stock held by such Shareholders;
    (d) All decisions regarding the Rights held by the Plan were made 
by the Participants whose accounts in the Plan received the Rights 
pursuant to the Offering, in accordance with the provisions under the 
Plan for individually-directed investment of such account; and
    (e) The Plan did not pay any fees or commissions in connection with 
the acquisition and or holding of the Rights.

Notice to Interested Persons

    Notice of the proposed exemption will be given to all Participants 
who received Rights within 20 days of the publication of the notice of 
proposed exemption in the Federal Register, by first class U.S. mail to 
the last known address of all such Participants. Such notice will 
contain a copy of the notice of proposed exemption, as published in the 
Federal Register, and a supplemental statement, as required pursuant to 
29 CFR 2570.43(b)(2). The supplemental statement will inform interested 
persons of their right to comment on and to request a hearing with 
respect to the pending exemption. Written comments and hearing requests 
are due within 50 days of the publication of the notice of proposed 
exemption in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Warren Blinder of the Department, 
telephone (202) 693-8553. (This is not a toll-free number.)

General Information

    The attention of interested persons is directed to the following:
    (1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption 
under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code 
does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified 
person from certain other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, 
including any prohibited transaction provisions to which the exemption 
does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of 
section 404 of the Act, which, among other things, require a fiduciary 
to discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of 
the participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion 
in accordance with section 404(a)(1)(b) of the Act; nor does it affect 
the requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must 
operate for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer 
maintaining the plan and their beneficiaries;
    (2) Before an exemption may be granted under section 408(a) of the 
Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code, the Department must find 
that the exemption is administratively feasible, in the interests of 
the plan and of its participants and beneficiaries, and protective of 
the rights of participants and beneficiaries of the plan;
    (3) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be supplemental to, 
and not in derogation of, any other provisions of the Act and/or the 
Code, including statutory or administrative exemptions and transitional 
rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an 
administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the 
transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction; and
    (4) The proposed exemptions, if granted, will be subject to the 
express condition that the material facts and representations contained 
in each application are true and complete, and that each application 
accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the 
subject of the exemption.

     Signed at Washington, DC, this 27th day of March 2012.
Lyssa E. Hall,
Acting Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security 
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor.
[FR Doc. 2012-7706 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>