alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7472]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 332-524]


Brazil: Competitive Factors Affecting U.S. and Brazilian 
Agricultural Sales in Selected Third Country Markets

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Extension of date for transmitting report.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Following the receipt of a letter on March 22, 2012, from the 
Committee on Finance of the United States Senate (Committee), the 
Commission has extended to April 26, 2012, the date for transmitting 
its report to the Committee in investigation No. 332-524, Brazil: 
Competitive Factors In Brazil Affecting U.S. and Brazilian Agricultural 
Sales in Selected Third Country Markets.

DATES: 
    March 22, 2012: Receipt of the letter from the Committee.
    April 26, 2012: New date for transmitting the Commission's report 
to the Committee.

Backround

    The Commission published notice of institution of the investigation 
in the Federal Register on May 24, 2011 (76 FR 30195). In its original 
notice of investigation, the Commission indicated that it would 
transmit its report to the Committee on March 26, 2012. The notice is 
also available on the Commission Web site at http://www.usitc.gov. All 
other information about the investigation, including a description of 
the subject matter to be addressed, contact information, and Commission 
addresses, remains the same as in the original notice. The public 
record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.


    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 23, 2012.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7472 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00005

- CR

J ESSICA M EINZER

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On App eal from County Criminal

Court No. 1

of Denton County ( CR

- 2020

- 02630

- A )

March 14, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in th e trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete “assault

family violence” as the offense for which Meinzer was convicted and to substitu te

“assault on a family member

– first offense” in its place. Additionally, the judgment is

modified to ref

lect that the trial court made a separate family violence finding under

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.013. It is ordered that the judgment of th e trial

court is affirmed as modified.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2006



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 Company Report
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 29, 2006
    
    /s/ WILLIAM S. MCCALMONT

William S. McCalmontExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1          CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Andre' Di Mino, President and Chief Executive Officer of ADM Tronics
Unlimited, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:
(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Date: July 11, 2003

 /s/ Andre' Di Mino
 -------------------------
     Andre' Di Mino
     Principal Executive Officer and
     Principal Financial Officer of the Company
#### In re Estate of Lagel: Welsh, Appellee, *v.*Dooley, Appellant.

(No. 31319

Decided March 17, 1948.)

*Messrs. Graham, Graham, Hollinsworth & Gottlieb,*for appellee.

*Mr. Aaron J. Halloran,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no, debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 44

Relating to the censure of William Jefferson Clinton.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. CHAFEE,

Mr. KOHL, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr.

DASCHLE, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. REID, Mr. GORTON, Mr. BRYAN, Mr.

MCCONNELL, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr.

CAMPBELL, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KERREY, Mr.

SCHUMER, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. BREAUX,

Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. REED, Ms. LANDRIEU,

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROBB, Mr. INOUYE,

and Mr. AKAKA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

Relating to the censure of William Jefferson Clinton.

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United

States, engaged in an inappropriate relationship with a

subordinate employee in the White House, which was

shameful, reckless and indefensible;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United

States, deliberately misled and deceived the American

people, and people in all branches of the United States

Government;
2

SRES 44 IS

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United

States, gave false or misleading testimony and his actions

have had the effect of impeding discovery of evidence in

judicial proceedings;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton’s conduct in this matter

is unacceptable for a President of the United States, does

demean the Office of the President as well as the President himself, and creates disrespect for the laws of the

land;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton fully deserves censure for

engaging in such behavior;

Whereas future generations of Americans must know that

such behavior is not only unacceptable but also bears

grave consequences, including loss of integrity, trust and

respect;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton remains subject to criminal actions in a court of law like any other citizen;

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton’s conduct in this matter

has brought shame and dishonor to himself and to the

Office of the President; and

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton through his conduct in

this matter has violated the trust of the American people:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the United States Senate does hereby cen3 sure William Jefferson Clinton, President of the

4 United States, and does condemn his wrongful con5 duct in the strongest terms;
3

SRES 44 IS

1 (2) the United States Senate recognizes the his2 toric gravity of this bipartisan resolution, and trusts

3 and urges that future congresses will recognize the

4 importance of allowing this bipartisan statement of

5 censure and condemnation to remain intact for all

6 time; and

7 (3) the Senate now move on to other matters

8 of significance to our people, to reconcile differences

9 between and within the branches of government, and

10 to work together—across party lines—for the benefit

11 of the American people.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1189

DONALD F. KING, Trustee,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MOHAMMAD ALGHANEM; MANAL ABOKWIDIR,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District

Judge. (CA-03-1112-A)

Submitted: August 11, 2004 Decided: September 27, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohammad Alghanem, Manal Abokwidir, Appellants Pro Se. James

Walter Reynolds, Heather Dawn Dawson, ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN,

P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Alghanem and Manal Abokwidir, husband and wife,

appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy

court’s order setting aside the transfer of Alghanem’s property,

from Alghanem to himself and his wife, as a fraudulent conveyance

under 11 U.S.C. § 548(a)(l) (2000). We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Alghanem, No.

CA-03-1112-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 12, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         66,806
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                   7,629
<INVENTORY>                                    8,183
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               282,589
<PP&E>                                         1,316,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                 266,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,342,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          292,883
<BONDS>                                        1,366,380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       1,436
<OTHER-SE>                                     413,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,342,221
<SALES>                                        292,883
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,883
<CGS>                                          176,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,766
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               74,870
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                15,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,996
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            11,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   11,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.07
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.2

                 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities  Act"),
provides  that if any part of a  registration  statement  at the time  such part
becomes  effective  contains an untrue  statement of a material fact or omits to
state a material  fact  required to be stated  therein or  necessary to make the
statements  therein not misleading,  any person acquiring a security pursuant to
such  registration  statement  (unless  it is  proved  that at the  time of such
acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others,
every  accountant who has consented to be named as having  prepared or certified
any part of the registration  statement,  or as having prepared or certified any
report or valuation which is used in connection with the registration statement,
with  respect  to the  statement  in such  registration  statement,  report,  or
valuation, which purports to have been prepared or certified by the accountant.

On August 27, 2001, Main Street and Main Incorporated (the "Company")  dismissed
Arthur Andersen LLP  ("Andersen") as its independent  auditor and appointed KPMG
LLP to replace  Andersen.  Prior to the date of filing this Form 10-K,  Andersen
ceased operations.  As a result,  after reasonable efforts, the Company has been
unable to obtain Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference of
Andersen's  report dated March 12, 2001 with respect to the Company's  financial
statements as of December 25, 2000 and for the year ended December 25, 2000 into
the Company's Registration Statements (Reg. Nos. 33-71230, 333-28659, 333-78161,
333-42122, 33-55108, 33-43612, 333-78155,  333-89931, and 333-55100). Such audit
report is included in this Form 10-K.

Under these  circumstances,  Rule 437a of the Securities Act permits the Company
to file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the above listed
registration statements,  without a written consent from Andersen.  Accordingly,
Andersen  will not be liable to those  persons  purchasing  the shares  register
under those registration  statements,  under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act
because  Andersen has not  consented to the  incorporation  by reference in this
registration  statement  of its report  dated  March 12, 2001  appearing  in the
Company's  Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended  December 25,  2000.  The Company
believes,  however, that other persons who are liable under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act, including the Company's  officers and directors,  may still rely
on  Andersen's  audit reports as being made by an expert under the due diligence
defense  provision of Section 11(b) of the Securities  Act. The law in this area
remains unsettled, however, and no assurance can be given that a court will find
such reliance to be justified.
EXHIBIT 32.1




        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thai One On,
Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Evon Au, Chief
Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  May 13, 2005         /s/ Evon Au
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer of
                              Thai One On, Inc., Registrant
Related Links 

# Oil & Gas Code Definitions

Code Type: **Well Type Get List** 


### Select code type and click on "Get List"


# Well Type Definitions

Code Definition **AGD Acid Gas Disposal AI Air Injection**  **CBM Coal Bed Methane DF Dump Flood Injector**  **DFP Dump Flood Injector/Producer GASC Gas Condensate**  **GASD Dry Gas GASN Nitrogen Gas Well**  **GI Gas Injection GS Gas Storage**  **INJP Injector, Producer OG Oil & Gas**  **ST Stratigraphic Test SWD Salt Water Disposal**  **WI Water Injection**
**WS Water Source**

**[ DMR Home**  **] [ Disclaimer**  **] [ Privacy**  **] [ Security**  **] [ Feedback**  **]** Well Search 

### Page **1 of**  **1 NDIC Oil & Gas Code Help Index** 

**2/ 4/**  **2013 https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/codehelp.asp** From: Kirby, Nathan J. To: Brent Ruminski Cc: Ritter, Alison M. Subject: RE: Data Use Agreement for NDIC Subscription Date: Monday, November 24, 2014 5:05:19 PM

Brent,

Per our disclaimer at https://www.dmr.nd.gov/oilgas/disclaimer.asp . We as an agency hold no ownership of the data, it is provided as is and free to use. The only cost is with the subscription to access it electronically.

Thanks Nathan

Nathan J. Kirby Database Design Analyst II NDIC Oil and Gas Division 701-328-8020

From: Brent Ruminski [mailto:Brent.Ruminski@erg.com] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 11:18 AM To: Kirby, Nathan J. Subject: Data Use Agreement for NDIC Subscription

Hi Nathan, My name is Brent Ruminski, an engineer at Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG). I just spoke with one of your colleagues named Allison and she provided me your contact information. For background information, my company is under contract with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and we had a “basic subscription” service that recently expired. The reason I am contacting you is we currently have a unique situation where we performed several analyses using data obtained through our “basic subscription” with NDIC. We performed these analyses to support an EPA rulemaking. Part of the rulemaking process requires EPA to release as much their analyses and raw data to the public as possible with the exceptions of copyrighted data. After reviewing the agreement and your website, I do not see any copyright claims or data use agreement. Can you please confirm that the raw data obtained through the “basic subscription” with NDIC is not copyrighted and that NDIC does not object to EPA publishing this raw data electronically on regulations.gov. Of course, full citation to NDIC will be provided with the data. I provided the specific data we used in the attachment (I deleted most rows to minimize file size). We also recorded monthly production numbers using the subscription service which would also be published. Please let me know If you would like to set up a call to discuss further or need any other information. Thank you, Brent Ruminski Eastern Research Group, Inc. (ERG) 14555 Avion Parkway Suite 200Chantilly, VA 20151 703-633-1701 (office)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of QC Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas E. Nickerson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 8, 2007



/s/ Douglas E. NickersonDouglas E. NickersonChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aearo Company I (the 'Company'), on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the 'Report'), I,
Michael A. McLain, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Michael A. McLain
                                                 Michael A. McLain
                                                 Chairman, President
                                                 and Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005


A signed written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aearo
Company I and will be retained by Aearo Company I and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission and its staff upon request.