alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The State of e/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 21, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00207

- CR

Jessica G. CASTILLO

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 4, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 458109 Honorable Jason Garrahan, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In these companion cases, A ppellant’s brief s were due on June 17 , 2015

. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 38.6(a)

. W e granted Appellant ’s first motion s for extension s of time to file the brief s until July 17 , 2015 . On July 20 , 2015

, Appellant filed second motion s for extension of time to
file the brief s until August 17 , 2015 , for a total extension of sixty days.
Appellant’s motion s are GRANTED

. Appellant must file the brief s not later than August
17 , 2015

. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF S WILL BE GRANTED

. If Appellant fails to file the brief s as ordered, we may abate th ese appeal s and remand
them to the trial court for abandonment hearing s

. See id. R. 38.8(b); Samaniego v. State , 9 52 S.W.2d 50, 52

– 53 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, J usticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 21st day of July, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Cle rk of Court
- 372 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

GARRISON v. OTTO

Cite as 308 Neb. 372

Margaret L. Garrison, appellee, v. 

Logan M. Otto II, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed February 5, 2021. No. S-20-386.

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: John 

A. Colborn, Judge. Affirmed.

Edith T. Peebles, of Brodkey, Cuddigan, Peebles, Belmont & 

Line, L.L.P., for appellant.

Adam R. Little, of Ballew Hazen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal of a domestic abuse protection order, which 

we moved to our docket. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106(3) 

(Cum. Supp. 2018).

The court, having considered the oral arguments and having reviewed the record de novo, finds that the domestic abuse 

protection order entered by the trial court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

03/12/2021 01:09 AM CST
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                         0000847468
<NAME>                                        Waste Systems International Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         12,871,773
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  10,109,368
<ALLOWANCES>                                   815,219
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               24,628,927
<PP&E>                                         188,080,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13,123,315)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 255,093,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,724,404
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    15,000,000
<COMMON>                                       203,309
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   255,093,091
<SALES>                                        54,666,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,666,320
<CGS>                                          37,921,091
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  61,985,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,259,148
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,579,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (28,261,697
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,899)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (28,255,798)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (224,358)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (28,480,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.82)



</TABLE>
EX-10.35



 





Exhibit 10.35




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE

TO THE

PHH CORPORATION

2005 EQUITY AND INCENTIVE PLAN




WHEREAS, PHH Corporation (the “Company”) sponsors and maintains the PHH Corporation 2005
Equity and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”);



WHEREAS, Section 11 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may amend
the Plan at any time, provided that no amendment may adversely affect any of the rights of any
grantee under any award theretofore granted under the Plan without such grantee’s consent; and



WHEREAS, the Board wishes to amend the Plan to accommodate the transfer of certain employees
to PHH Home Loans, LLC, and such other joint ventures as the Company may participate in from time
to time.



NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2(hh) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting such section in its
entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof:



“(hh) ‘Subsidiary’ means any corporation, limited partnership, limited
liability company or other entity (other than the Company) in or of which the
Company owns, directly or indirectly, at the time the relevant Award is granted, an
equity interest possessing 50 percent or more of the total combined voting power of
all equity interests of such entity; provided, however, that with respect to
any Grantee who has participated in the Plan for a period of at least one year, if
such Grantee is transferred by the Company or a Subsidiary to another entity in or
of which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, less than 50 percent of the total
combined voting power of all equity interests in or of such entity, such entity
shall be treated as a Subsidiary solely for purposes of determining whether such
Grantee has incurred a termination of employment with respect to any Awards
outstanding as of the date of such transfer; and provided, further, that for
purposes of ISOs granted pursuant to the Plan, the term ‘Subsidiary’ means a
‘subsidiary corporation,’ whether now or hereafter existing, as defined in Section
424(f) of the Code.”



This Amendment Number One to the Plan has been adopted by the Board of Directors the ___day
of July, 2005, to be effective as of such date.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PHH CORPORATION


	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title:  	 	 
	 




1
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)
 þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006
OR  o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___to___
 Commission File Number 0-20774
 ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.
  Texas
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
    
    75-2142963
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1231 Greenway Drive, Suite 600
Irving, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    75038
(Zip Code)
 (972) 550-5000
  Name of each exchangeTitle of each class
    
    on which registered
 None
 Common Stock, $.01 par value
 þ o
 o þ
 þ o
 o
 o þ o
 o þ
  DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATAITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement SchedulesSIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSCertification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906    Table of Contents  EXPLANATORY NOTE




---



##### Table of Contents



PART II
 
 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
  
 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
    Internal ControlIntegrated Framework Internal ControlIntegrated Framework




---



##### Table of Contents



PART IV
 
 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
   REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework Internal
Control Integrated Framework Internal Control Integrated Framework




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC.By:
    /s/  WILLIAM S. MCCALMONTWilliam S. McCalmontExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    September 1, 2006




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit31.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 200232.1
    
    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2
    
    Certification of Chief Financial pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 185 ) ll-K - (F ) -1 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54

AM Sheet 185of 325P. 2

II-K-(F)-1 3 IFCA M RESULT S FORA

"1. 2 LB . S0 2 " CASE . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EE

A t o D . Carter , DOE.EV . Februar y 25 , 1981 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(F)-1 3
#### Pinkie HAMLIN, Appellant, v. NORTH SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 85-2082.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 6, 1986.

*121Frank M. Brezina, Miami, for appellant.

Hayt, Hayt & Landau and Alan M. Fisher and Keith F. Backer, Miami, for appel-lee

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered below in favor of the plaintiff North Shore Medical Center, Inc. in a suit to recover the amount due and owing on a hospital bill for hospital services and supplies rendered to the defendant Pinkie Hamlin. The defendant Hamlin appeals contending that a genuine issue of material fact is presented on this record by virtue of the respective parties’ conflicting affidavits filed below as to the amount of money she owes to the plaintiff hospital. The defendant Hamlin concedes, however, that she is liable to the plaintiff hospital for said services rendered and contests only the amount due and owing. We agree entirely with the defendant Hamlin and reject the plaintiff hospital’s contention that the defense affidavit herein was incompetent to raise a genuine issue as to the amount due the plaintiff hospital in this case. Accordingly, we affirm the final summary judgment under review insofar as it holds the defendant Hamlin liable to the plaintiff hospital in this cause; we reverse, however, the final summary judgment under review in all other respects and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. *See Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510.

This reversal, however, shall be without prejudice to the plaintiff North Shore Medical Center, Inc. to renew its motion for summary judgment upon the filing of additional affidavits and other sworn proofs which conclusively refute, as this record does not, the defendant Hamlin’s affidavit filed herein.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
exv10w31



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.31




July 8, 2005




Dr. Anthony Warren




Dear Dr. Warren:





     We are very pleased that you have agreed to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of
Global Secure Corp. As we’ve discussed, Global Secure is focused on securing the homeland with
integrated products and services for the critical incident response community worldwide. Global
Secure is made up of three business units – Global Secure Systems, Global Secure Training and
Global Secure Safety, each working to provide a comprehensive solution to our customers
incorporating information and communications technologies, training and exercise programs, and
protective equipment.



     As a member of our Board of Directors you will receive a compensation package consisting of
the following: 1) upon joining the Board of Directors, you will receive a grant of options to
purchase 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company that would vest in equal annual tranches
over 3 years dependent upon your continued service as a director and subject to the terms and
conditions of our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and the governing Stock Option Agreement, 2) upon
joining the Board of Directors and on each anniversary of service thereafter, you will receive a
$20,000 annual fee, and 3) you will also receive a fee of $2,500 for attendance at each meeting of
the Board of Directors.



     Global Secure is pleased to welcome you.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	


/s/ Craig R. Bandes
 	 
	 	Craig R. Bandes 	 
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 110 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 26, 2001

        Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National Children's 
                           Memorial Flag Day.

Whereas among the world's 26 richest nations, the United States accounted for 73 
        percent of child homicide victims;
Whereas at least 3 children a day die from physical abuse or chronic neglect in 
        the United States;
Whereas April has been designated as National Child Abuse Prevention Month, an 
        annual tradition started by President Jimmy Carter in 1979; and
Whereas the fourth Friday of each April is National Children's Memorial Flag 
        Day, when many State and local governmental agencies and private 
        organizations fly the Children's Memorial Flag to remember children lost 
        to violence and to heighten public awareness of the need for communities 
        to help vulnerable children and families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) supports National Children's Memorial Flag Day; and
            (2) encourages national, State, and local agencies and 
        private organizations to fly the Children's Memorial Flag--
                    (A) to remember children lost to violence; and
                    (B) to raise public awareness about the continuing 
                problem of violence against children.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18252-18253]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; NHLBI Conference Grants.
    Date: April 19-20, 2012.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Chang Sook Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7179, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0287, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c2f2d3e232027230c212d252062222524622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e88b899a87848387a885898184c6868180c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Ancilliary Studies in Clinical Trials.

[[Page 18253]]

    Date: April 20, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Tony L Creazzo, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7180, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0725, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f0c1d0a0e1515001b032f020e06034101060741080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="234051464259594c574f634e424a4f0d4d4a4b0d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7334 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES E. DOWNING, a/k/a Marcus Moultrie, a/k/a Rahmel Lyles, a/k/a Ramez Lyles, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00052-H; 4:06-cv-00184-H) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Downing, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: James E. Downing seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Downing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Patriot Financial Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John D. Belew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ John
      D. BelewJohn
      D. BelewChief
      Executive Officer
                November
      16, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 52 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 21
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 52

     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 1999

Mr. McConnell, from the Committee on Rules and Administration, reported 
  the following original resolution; which was placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

    Resolved, That a collection of the rules of the committees of the 
Senate, together with related materials, be printed as a Senate 
document, and that there be printed 600 additional copies of such 
document for the use of the Committee on Rules and Administration.
                                                        Calendar No. 21

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               S. RES. 52

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

     To authorize the printing of a collection of the rules of the 
                       committees of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 25, 1999

                         Placed on the calendar
```