alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Diamond
Entertainment Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mulugetta Bezzabeh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                                /s/ Mulugetta Bezzabeh
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Mulugetta Bezzabeh
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
                                                Date: August 10, 2007
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              OWL INVESTMENT CORP.


         Owl Investment Corp., a corporation organized and existing under and by
virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:

                                     FIRST:

         That the Board of Directors of Owl Investment Corp. duly adopted
resolutions declaring the necessity of amending the Certificate of Incorporation
of the Corporation; and that said amendment was authorized by the written
consent of a majority of the issued and outstanding voting shares of the
Corporation in lieu of a special meeting of the shareholders. The resolution
setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

         RESOLVED: that the Certificate of Incorporation be amended by changing
Articled I thereof so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as
follows:

                                    ARTICLE I

         The name of the Corporation is Mark Four Resources Inc.

                                     SECOND:

         That the Board of Directors, duly adopted a resolution acknowledging
receipt of written consent of the owner of a majority of the issued and
outstanding shares of the Corporation which were obtained in lieu of a special
meeting of Shareholders in accordance of Section 228 of the General Corporation
Law of the State of Delaware. Said consent by the necessary number of shares as
required by statute approved the amendment.

                                     THIRD:

         That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions
of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.



<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said Owl Investment Corp. has caused this
certificate to be signed by David Shaw, its President and attested by its
Corporate Secretary, as of this 14th day of September 1989.

                                      OWL INVESTMENT CORP.


                                      By:_________________________________
                                           David Shaw, President

ATTEST:


By:______________________________
     Corporate Secretary
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick F.Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |            |   |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |            |   |   |   |   |   |
|                    |            |   |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |            |   |   |   |   |   |
|                    |            |   |   |   |   |   |
|                    | August 08, 2007 |   |   |   |   |   |
|                         |                 |        |        |        |        |        |  |

 

 

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James WILLIAMS.

No. 88-KH-0244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Williams, James; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. K1244807.

Denied. Moot. Relator has been released.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6111]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-6803-000]


Schriver, Darryl; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on March 6, 2012, Darryl Schriver submitted for 
filing, an application for authority to hold interlocking positions, 
pursuant to section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825d(b) 
(2011) and section 45.8 of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's 
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 45.8 (2011).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f797a6d7c70515356515a6c4a4f4f504d4b7f595a4d5c11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5e3e0f7e6eacbc9cccbc0f6d0d5d5cad7d1e5c3c0d7c68bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 27, 2012.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6111 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Lambert, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 27, 2007By:

/s/ David W. LambertDAVID W. LAMBERTSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 78 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 78

 To authorize representation of Members and officers of the Senate in 
             the case of Jim Russell v. Albert Gore, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 1999

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To authorize representation of Members and officers of the Senate in 
             the case of Jim Russell v. Albert Gore, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Jim Russell v. Albert Gore, et al., Case No. 99-2-00749-
        1, pending in Yakima County Superior Court, Yakima County, Washington, 
        the plaintiff has named as defendants Vice President Albert Gore, 
        Senator Slade Gorton, and Senator Patty Murray; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members and officers of the Senate in civil 
        actions relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Vice President Gore, Senator Gorton, and Senator Murray in the case of 
Jim Russell v. Albert Gore, et al.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





I,
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby
certify that:





(1)  I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Rotoblock Corporation;





(2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





(4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and





(5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated: September 14,
2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION





/s/
Richard Di Stefano


By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 122

Authorizing the reporting of committee funding resolutions for the period

October 1, 1999 through February 28, 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. DODD) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the reporting of committee funding resolutions

for the period October 1, 1999 through February 28, 2001.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding paragraph 9 of rule

2 XXVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate—

3 (1) not later than July 15, 1999, each com4 mittee shall report 1 resolution authorizing the com5 mittee to make expenditures out of the contingent

6 fund of the Senate to defray its expenses, including

7 the compensation of members of its staff, for the pe8 riod October 1, 1999 through February 28, 2001;

9 and
2

•SRES 122 ATS

1 (2) the Committee on Rules and Administration

2 may report 1 authorization resolution containing

3 more than 1 committee authorization resolution for

4 the period October 1, 1999 through February 28,

5 2001.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2021

No. 04

- 20

- 00442

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A., Y.A., A.A., CHILDREN,

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI01637 The Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The district clerk notified this court that she had not file d the clerk’s record because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record and appellant wa s not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On December 22, 2020 , we ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court by January 29, 2021 that either (1) the fee had been paid or arrang ements had been made to pay the fee, or (2) appellant wa s entitled to appeal without paying the fee. On January 29, 2021 , appellant responded to our order stating she ha d paid the clerk’s fee. Accordingly, we ORDER the district clerk to file the clerk’s r ecord by March 4, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of February, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### Gregory Ward MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-206.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 1988.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Ro-yan p. Terry, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED and REMANDED for a new trial. *See Wilcott v. State,*509 So.2d 261 (Fla.1987); *Cooper v. State,*512 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); and *Moore v. State,*512 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

SMITH, C.J., and ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Urudad Administrabva Especoal Bogota D .C., Julio 2 de 2014 1063054 . 1 - - 2014030449 Senor Paul Gretch Director. Office of I nternationa l Aviation U . S . Departm ent of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave ., S .E. Washington , D.C . 20590 Estimado Sr . Gretch : La autoridad de Aviaci6n Civil de Colomb ia per solicitud de Ia aerolinea colo mb iana , LINEA AEREA CARGUERA DE COLOMBIA S .A. , LANGO para efectuar operaciones charter en Ia ruta MIAMI-SAN JOSE -M IAMI , confi rma per Ia presente al Departamento de Transporte de los Estados Unidos que , en adici6n a los derechos previstos en el Acuerdo de Transporte Aereo entre Colombia 

### y Estados Unidos del 10 de mayo de 2011, el Gobierno de Colombia otorgara su aprobaci6n , sabre Ia base de reciprocidad, a las solicitudes de las campania aereas de Estados Unidos para operar vuelos charter de carga con derechos de septima libertad , en el entendido de que el gobierno de los Estados Un idos concedera los mismos derechos a las companias aereas designadas per Colombia. Si n otro particular, reciba un cord ial saluda

ficina de Transporte Aereo (e)

P royect6 : Ma. Isabe l Rojas. Grupe As untos lnternacio nales y Regu l atorios Revis6 : Claudia Esguerra Barragan , Jefe Grupe Asuntos lnternacionales y Regulatorios Ruta electr6n ica: \\bog7\AOI\Externo\2014030449
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 108

Designating the month of March each year as ‘‘National Colorectal Cancer

Awareness Month’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 26, 1999

Mr. BREAUX (for himself, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. MACK, and Mr. JOHNSON)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the month of March each year as ‘‘National

Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month’’.

Whereas colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States;

Whereas it is estimated that in 1999, physicians will diagnose

129,400 new cases of colorectal cancer in the United

States;

Whereas in 1999, the disease is expected to kill 56,600 individuals in this country;

Whereas less than 50 percent of individuals above age 50 receive annual screenings for colorectal cancer;

Whereas adopting a healthy diet at a young age can significantly reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer;
2

•SRES 108 IS

Whereas March is also designated as National Nutrition

Awareness Month and the prevention of colorectal cancer

is highly dependent on dietary factors;

Whereas regular screenings can save large numbers of lives;

and

Whereas education can help inform the public of methods of

prevention and symptoms of early detection: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL COLORECTAL

3 CANCER AWARENESS MONTH.

4 The Senate—

5 (1) designates March of each year as ‘‘National

6 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month’’; and

7 (2) requests that the President issue a procla8 mation calling upon the people of the United States

9 to observe the month with appropriate ceremonies

10 and activities.

Æ
----

**Exhibit 32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers ofNewport Gold, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify,[to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form 10-QSB forthe nine-month period ended September 30, 2007****(the "Form *10-QSB*")of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form*10-QSB* fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

| Date: November 14, 2007 | "Derek Bartlett"                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Derek Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer
 Date: November 14, 2007"John Arnold"John Arnold, Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141479 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141479 

 COA: 286270 

Macomb CC: 2007-004032-FC 

CRYSTAL TAMARA CONKLIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.