alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 7, 2008



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|    |  | Patrick Bratton        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A  of NYMAGIC, INC.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report.
 May 8, 2008
    /s/ A. George KallopA. George KallopPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit31.2**

BG FINANCIALGROUP, INC.

CERTIFICATION -CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, T. Don Waddell,certify that:

1.                                      I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of BG Financial Group, Inc.

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.                                      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)             Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

a)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c)             Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting;

5.                                      The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

a)             All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)            Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |   | Signature: | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |
|-------------------------|--------|------------|-------------------------|
|                    |   |       | T. Don Waddell          |
|                    |   |       | Chief Financial Officer |

 

21

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Danny GREER.

No. 88-KH-0242.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Greer, Danny; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 319722.

*430Denied. Relator should request copies of transcripts from his counsel.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id:**

**Series title: Labor force status:**  **Type of data: Age:**  **Years:**

**Year Jan**  **Feb Mar** **Apr May** **Jun Jul** **Aug Sep** **Oct Nov** **Dec 2001**  156 178 154 155 119 144 141 195 175 203 190 209 **2002** 215 209 258 220 217 231 239 235 219 205 224 284 **2003** 299 289 256 228 240 235 234 273 240 228 262 298 **2004** 304 293 233 213 224 240 252 246 228 215 237 251 **2005** 268 242 230 204 176 194 223 237 214 169 189 227 **2006** 226 202 148 178 203 190 237 197 205 182 208 230 **2007** 246 270 260 191 230 221 235 224 225 233 205 212 **2008** 258 271 270 210 199 241 293 323 302 350 379406 **2009** 540490 548 500 519 573 628 593 606 585 667 639 **2010** 608 666 659 619 647 660 714 793 674 679 649 623 **2011** 703 678 673 653 643 689 744 632 610 Unemployed Number in thousands 60 to 64 years 2001 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value**

LNU03000096 **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 60-64 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:46 AM)Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Annual** 168 230 257 245 214 200 229 292 574 666

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: October 17, 2011 (10:52:46 AM)
#### Commonwealth ex rel. Bogart, Appellant, *v.*Myers.

*544Submitted March 23, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Robert*Bogart, appellant, in propria persona.

*Vincent A. Conchara,*Assistant. District Attorney, for appellee.

April 12, 1962:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Forrest of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, as reported in 26 Pa. D, & C. 2d 607.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the services and sacrifices of the United

States merchant marine.

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas throughout our history, the United States merchant

marine has served the Nation during times of war;

Whereas the merchant marine served as the Nation’s first

navy, and defeated the British Navy to help gain the Nation’s independence;

Whereas during World War II more than 250,000 men and

women served in the merchant marine, and faced dangers
2

•HCON 109 EH

from the elements, and from mines, submarines, other

armed enemy vessels, and aircraft;

Whereas during World War II vessels of the merchant marine

fleet, such as the S.S. Lane Victory, provided critical

logistical support to the Armed Forces by carrying equipment, supplies, and personnel necessary to the war effort;

Whereas President Franklin D. Roosevelt and many military

leaders praised the role of the merchant marine as the

‘‘Fourth Arm of Defense’’ during World War II;

Whereas during World War II more than 6,800 members of

the merchant marine were killed at sea, more than

11,000 were wounded, and more than 600 were taken

prisoner;

Whereas 1 out of every 32 members of the merchant marine

serving during World War II died in the line of duty, a

higher percentage of war related deaths than in any of

the armed services;

Whereas, at a time when the people of the United States are

recognizing the contributions of the Armed Forces and

civilian personnel to the national security, it is appropriate to recognize the service of the merchant marine;

and

Whereas the merchant marine continues to serve and protect

the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) honors the service and sacrifice of members

4 of the United States merchant marine;
3

•HCON 109 EH

1 (2) recognizes the critical role played by vessels

2 of the United States merchant marine fleet in trans3 porting equipment, supplies, and personnel in sup4 port of the Nation’s defense;

5 (3) recognizes the historical significance of May

6 22 as National Maritime Day, so designated in 1933

7 to commemorate the anniversary of the first trans8 oceanic voyage under steam propulsion, and finds it

9 fitting and proper on this day of paying tribute to

10 our maritime history to pay special honor to the

11 merchant marine;

12 (4) encourages the American people and appro13 priate government agencies, through appropriate

14 ceremonies and activities, to recognize the services

15 and sacrifices of the United States merchant marine,

16 and to observe this day by displaying the flag of the

17 United States at their homes and other suitable

18 places; and
4

•HCON 109 EH

1 (5) requests that all ships sailing under the

2 United States flag prominently display the flag on

3 this day.

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2001.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. for the quarter ended March 31, 2006;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(a)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 12, 2006

By:  /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

Senior Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
#### Commonwealth *v.*Levy, Appellant.

Argued March 5, 1962.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Woodside, J., absent).

*Harvey Qelb,*with him *Morris B. Qelb,*for appellant.

*Thomas J. Foley,*Assistant District Attorney, with biin *Joseph J. Oimino,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

March 21, 1962:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Nealon of the Court of *298Quarter Sessions of Lackawanna County, as reported in 26 Pa. D. & C. 2d 429.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 25 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 25

    To reform the budget process by making the process fairer, more 
                       efficient, and more open.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

     Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Kyl) submitted the following 
     resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    To reform the budget process by making the process fairer, more 
                       efficient, and more open.

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PROGRAMS OVER $1,000,000.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph 1 of rule XVI of the Standing Rules of 
the Senate is amended by inserting ``in excess of $1,000,000,'' after 
``new item of appropriation,''.
    (b) 60 Vote Point of Order.--Rule XVI of the Standing Rule of the 
Senate is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``9. Paragraph 1 may be waived or suspended only by the affirmative 
vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An 
affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn, 
shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a 
point of order raised under paragraph 1.''.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDING TO APPROPRIATIONS BILLS IN THE SENATE.

    Rule XVI of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``10. On any day after June 30 of a calendar year, a motion to 
proceed to the consideration of an appropriations measure shall be 
decided without debate.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Iris Oifigiúil C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 145 |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 6330 Aibreán 2020 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 145

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

6330 Aibreán 2020

---

| Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | An Chomhairle |
| 2020/C 145/01 | Cinneadh ón gComhairle an 28 Aibreán 2020 lena gceaptar comhaltaí an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

An Chomhairle

2020/C 145/01

Cinneadh ón gComhairle an 28 Aibreán 2020 lena gceaptar comhaltaí an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil

1

---

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

An Chomhairle

| 30.4.2020 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

C 145/1

---

CINNEADH ÓN GCOMHAIRLE

an 28 Aibreán 2020

lena gceaptar comhaltaí an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil

(2020/C 145/01)

TÁ COMHAIRLE AN AONTAIS EORPAIGH,

Ag féachaint don Chonradh ag bunú an Chomhphobail Eorpaigh do Fhuinneamh Adamhach, agus go háirithe Airteagal 134(2) de,

Tar éis di dul i gcomhairle leis an gCoimisiún Eorpach,

De bharr an mhéid seo a leanas:

| (1) | Le Cinneadh an 6 Samhain 2018 (1), cheap an Chomhairle comhaltaí an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil (“an Coiste”) don tréimhse ón 6 Samhain 2018 go dtí an 6 Samhain 2023. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Le Cinneadh an 6 Samhain 2018 (1), cheap an Chomhairle comhaltaí an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil (“an Coiste”) don tréimhse ón 6 Samhain 2018 go dtí an 6 Samhain 2023.

| (2) | Tar éis don Uas. Eugenijus UŠPURAS bás a fháil, tá suíochán ar an gCoiste folamh anois. Dá bhrí sin, ba cheart comhalta nua a cheapadh don chuid eile de théarma oifige Eugenijus UŠPURAS. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Tar éis don Uas. Eugenijus UŠPURAS bás a fháil, tá suíochán ar an gCoiste folamh anois. Dá bhrí sin, ba cheart comhalta nua a cheapadh don chuid eile de théarma oifige Eugenijus UŠPURAS.

| (3) | Tar éis don Uas. Grzegorz WROCHNA éirí as oifig, tá suíochán ar an gCoiste folamh anois. Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, comhalta nua a cheapadh ar feadh a mbeidh fágtha de théarma oifige Grzegorz WROCHNA, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Tar éis don Uas. Grzegorz WROCHNA éirí as oifig, tá suíochán ar an gCoiste folamh anois. Ba cheart, dá bhrí sin, comhalta nua a cheapadh ar feadh a mbeidh fágtha de théarma oifige Grzegorz WROCHNA,

TAR ÉIS AN CINNEADH SEO A GHLACADH:

Airteagal 1

Ceaptar leis seo Uas. Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS agus Uas. Józef SOBOLEWSKI ina gcomhaltaí den Choiste Eolaíoch agus Teicniúil go dtí an 6 Samhain 2023.

Airteagal 2

Tiocfaidh an Cinneadh seo i bhfeidhm an dáta a ghlacfar é.

Arna dhéanamh sa Bhruiséil, 28 Aibreán 2020.

Thar ceann na Comhairle

An tUachtarán

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Cinneadh ón gComhairle an 6 Samhain 2018 lena gceaptar comhaltas an Choiste Eolaíoch agus Theicniúil (IO C 403, 9.11.2018, lch. 2).

1

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York,<br><br>against<br><br>Scott Hill, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered January 27, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Laurie Peterson, J.), rendered January 27, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>In view of the defendant's knowing waiver of his right to prosecution by information, the accusatory instrument is assessed under the standard applicable to a misdemeanor complaint (see <a href="../2014/2014_04038.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Dumay</i>, 23 NY3d 518</a>, 522 [2014]). So viewed, the accusatory instrument was jurisdictionally valid because it described facts of an evidentiary nature establishing reasonable cause to believe that defendant was guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 220.03). The deponent police officer's allegations that he observed defendant smoking a lit cigarette that the officer identified as containing phencyclidine, a controlled substance, based on his "professional training as a police officer in the identification of drugs, [his] prior experience as a police officer making drug arrests," the "the odor emanating from the substance" and his "observation of the packaging, which is characteristic of this type of drug," sufficed to show the basis for the conclusion that the substance at issue was a controlled substance (<i>see People v Dumas</i>, 68 NY2d 729, 731 [1986]<a href="../2017/2017_50054.htm" target="_blank"><i>; People v Quinones</i>, 54 Misc 3d 133</a>[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50054[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2017], <i>lv denied </i>29 NY3d 951 [2017]; <a href="../2015/2015_09188.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also People v Smalls</i>, 26 NY3d 1064</a> [2015]<a href="../2009/2009_02446.htm" target="_blank"><i>; People v Kalin</i>, 12 NY3d 225</a> [2009]<i>; cf. <a href="../2014/2014_51482.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Rosario</i></a></i>, 45 Misc 3d 127[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51482[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2014]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concurI concurI concur<i><br>Decision Date: June 14, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></i></partyblock>