alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
E E RE I nformation C enter P rograms and O ffic es Searc h Help M ore Searc h O ptions

P rintable V ersion 

## Residential Refrigerators, Refrigerator-Freezers and Freezers NOPR Analytical Tools The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) prepared the analytical spreadsheets listed below for the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) analyses conducted for the energy conservation standards rulemaking on residential refrigerators, refrigerator-freezers and freezers.

Some of the following files are zipped files. Download Winzip

Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) and Payback Period (PBP) Coming soon

National Impacts Analysis (NIA)Standard-Size Refrigerators and RefrigeratorFreezers (ZIP 1.4 MB) Standard-Size Freezers (ZIP 1.1 MB)Compact Refrigerators and RefrigeratorFreezers (ZIP 983 KB) Compact Freezers (ZIP 779 KB)

Government Regulatory Impact Model (GRIM) GRIM Spreadsheet (ZIP 2.0 MB)

Other Energy Standard C alculations - Calculation of proposed energy standards taking into consideration (1) test procedure changes, (2) slope change for some product classes, and (3) proposed percent reductions in energy use.



### Contact Information Subid Wagley 202-287-1414

P rintable V ersion

Building Technologie s Program Hom e | EERE Hom e | U.S. Departm ent o f Energy Webm aster | Web Site Policie s | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Upda ted: 09/23/2010 

## 9/24/2010 A ppliances and Commercial Equipment...

...energy.gov/.../refrig_freezers_nopr_... 1/1
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0003062 19-MAR-2015 01:28 PM
SANITIZED

Asphalt Production
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer and President
| |  | /s/ JOSEPH A. CALO Joseph A. Calo Acting Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                   

May 15,
2009

This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Securities Act of
1933.

---



QuickLinks
t^f^^^FH u - Montan a Departmen t o f Transportatio n Vmoih yw . Reardon . Directo r /-^-/.o. . ; . .•.-v^.. ^ '-.iXSPQRWIO N Marc h8 , 201 2 •:;:' : i'OPERATiOM S Mr . Denni s DeVan y ^VJ . iiA RH P U

: 2 1 Chief , Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : DOT-OST-2003-1462 6 - Yellowston e Airport Carrie r Selectio n 201 2 Dea r Mr . DeVany : Th e Montan aDepartmen t o f Transportatio n (MDT ) i s please dt o offe r th e followin g comment s relativ e t o th e selectio n o f a n Essentia l Ai r

Servic e (EAS ) ai r

carrie r a t th e Yellowston e Airport

(WYS ) for

th e 201 2 seaso n (Jun e - September) . A s yo u know , WY S i s locate di n Wes t Yellowstone , Montan aan dMD T i s encourage dt o se e competitio n i n thi s market , thu s fosterin g health y promotio n o f service s fromal l intereste d ai r carrier s an dultimatel y resultin g i n bette r servic e for

th e community . Sk y Wes t Airline s ha s provide dthi s regio n for man y year s withexcellen t service , qualifie d staf f an dsupportiv e loca l interactio n relate dt o th e ai r carrie r need s o f Wes t Yellowstone . Furthermor e w e commen dSilve r Airway s fo

r providin g ahig hquality EA S rout e proposa l fo r review . Considerin g al l factors , MD T support s th e recommendatio n o f th e Tow n o f

Wes t Yellowston e i n continuin g withSk y Wes t for th e 201 2 seaso n an dMD T look s forwardt o a proposal fromSk

y Wes t for th e 201 3 seaso n withne w CRJ 20 0 Je t service . MD T i s prou do f

ou r partnershi p wit

hth e Tow n o f

Wes t Yellowston e an dth e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n an dw e than k yo u for considerin g ou r

comment s a s yo u choos e a n EA S carrie r

t o servic e th e community o f Wes t Yellowstone , Montana . Sincerely , Ti mReai^do

n Directo r Cc : Debbi e Aike . Administrato r - MD T Aeronautic s Ser n Johnson , ^4a

^ < ) C - To'svn o f

Wes t Yellowsion e Di('?cfor'. ^ C'fftc e A. l Ej::' . O^^DOrlUi.l i • •;••• ; "• • WebFoge : '/wvv.(r:d/m(.cio\ '

^ ) • • ; It. . F,:,, : 1406 1 444-764 i JTV : (800/335-75'."'. .
Open Literature Review Screen

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

Citation: Rimet, F., M. H. De Lacotte, et al. (1999). "Atrazine and Nicosu1furon effects

on phytoplanktonic communities of Lake of Geneva." Archives Des Sciences 52(2): 111-

122.

Date of Screen: 10/28/09

Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study

was not written in English.

Primary Reviewer: Michael Lowit, Ph.D., EPA '/~eW~v<lf

1 1II1IIIIII

2087844
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              PROJECTAVISION, INC.
                            (a Delaware corporation)


It is hereby certified that:

      1.  The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation") is
          Projectavision, Inc.

      2.  The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended
          by striking out Article One hereof and by substituting in lieu of said
          Article One the following new Article One:

          "First: The name of the Corporation is Vidikron Technologies Group,
          Inc."

      3.  The amendment of the certificate of incorporation herein certified has
          been duly adopted and stockholder consent has been obtained in
          accordance with the provisions of Sections 216 and 242 of the General
          Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

      4.  The effective time of the amendment herein certified shall be March 1,
          1999

Signed on March 1, 1999



                                     ----------------------------------------
                                     Martin J. Holleran
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Emerza TOUPS and Richard S. Toups, Sr. v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 86-C-2493.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Toups, Emerza; Toups, Richard S. Sr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition and mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-2055; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 78-12134.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 344.

Granted.
<PAGE>

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
listed below, of our report dated February 25, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of SAFLINK Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000:

   .  (Form S-8 No. 333-74253) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan of
      The National Registry, Inc.

   .  (Form S-3 No. 333-75789) pertaining to the registration of shares issued
      in the private placement effected in July 1999, registration of shares
      underlying options granted under the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, and the
      registration of shares issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred
      Stock.

   .  (Form S-8 No. 333-23467) pertaining to the registration of 1,332,859
      shares of the Company's common stock.

   .  (Form S-3 No. 333-01510) pertaining to the registration of shares issuable
      upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

   .  (Form S-8 No. 033-68832) pertaining to the registration of 1,214,000
      shares which may be offered to certain selling stockholders.

   .  (Form S-3 No. 333-58575) pertaining to the registration of shares issuable
      upon exercise of warrants.

   .  (Form S-3 No. 333-54084) pertaining to the registration of 13,010,706
      shares of common stock.


                                      /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
April 11, 2001
Environmental Quality Council Hearing

September 12, 2013--Public Notice

Newspaper Date of Publication

Casper Star Tribune July 15 and 16, 2013

Gillette News Record July 15, 2013

Cody Enterprise July 15, 2013

Wyoming Tribune-Eagle July 15, 2013

Rock Springs Daily Rocket Miner July 16, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1775

MANUEL CACERES-MARROQUIN,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: January 28, 2016 Decided: February 17, 2016

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George E. Lee, LEE IMMIGRATION LAW GROUP, Alpharetta, Georgia, 

for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant 

Attorney General, Kohsei Ugumori, Senior Litigation Counsel, 

Aric A. Anderson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Manuel Caceres-Marroquin, a native and citizen of 

Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of 

Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s finding that his South Carolina conviction for criminal 

domestic violence was categorically a “crime of domestic 

violence” under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E) (2012) that rendered 

him ineligible for cancellation of removal.

We review legal issues de novo, “affording appropriate 

deference to the [Board]’s interpretation of the [Immigration 

and Nationality Act] and any attendant regulations.” Li Fang 

Lin v. Mukasey, 517 F.3d 685, 691-92 (4th Cir. 2008). “Where 

. . . the [Board] construes statutes over which it has no 

particular expertise, [however,] its interpretations are not 

entitled to deference.” Karimi v. Holder, 715 F.3d 561, 566 

(4th Cir. 2013). Administrative findings of fact are conclusive 

unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude 

to the contrary. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012). We defer to 

the Board’s factual findings under the substantial evidence 

rule. Anim v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 243, 252 (4th Cir. 2008).

Upon review, we conclude that the Board properly concluded 

that Caceres-Marroquin’s South Carolina conviction constituted a 

crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. 16(a) (2012) that rendered him 

ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. 
3

§ 1227(a)(E)(1); 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C) (2012). We therefore 

deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the 

Board. See In re: Caceres-Marroquin (B.I.A. June 12, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC.


 


DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE
BONUS PROGRAM


 


Array
BioPharma Inc. (the “Company”) has established an annual performance bonus
program for employees, including the Company’s executive officers. Through this
program, employees can receive an annual bonus payable in cash, stock or stock
option equivalents based on achievement of key Company and individual
goals.  There is no guarantee that bonuses will be awarded in any given
year. The bonus program is intended to strengthen the connection between
individual compensation and Company success; reinforce the Company’s
pay-for-performance philosophy by awarding higher bonuses to higher performing
employees; and help ensure that the Company’s cash compensation is competitive.


 


At the
beginning of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee establishes the
minimum, target and stretch corporate performance goals for the upcoming fiscal
year. The goals generally are based on the following objective performance
criteria: revenues, earnings per share, year-end cash, clinical development
goals with respect to the Company’s proprietary drug programs, operational
goals relating to staffing, and new collaborations and out-licensing
transactions. Each participant in the bonus program may be eligible to receive
a target bonus amount calculated by multiplying the participant’s base salary
by a percentage value later assigned to the participant or his or her position
with the Company by the Compensation Committee.


 


Following
the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines in its
discretion the extent to which the company-wide and individual performance
goals were attained. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee will
award bonuses equal to a varying percentage of an employee’s target bonus
amount. The Compensation Committee may award a bonus in an amount less than or
greater than the amount earned by a participant under the bonus program.


 


Individual
bonuses can vary significantly based on performance. Any bonuses for a
particular year are paid as a lump sum cash award, less applicable payroll and
other withholdings, in the quarter following that year. The plan can be amended
in whole or in part but the compensation committee at any time until paid.


 


*****
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 106

Recognizing the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights Park in New

Ulm, Minnesota, as a national symbol of the contributions of Americans

of German heritage.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 2000

Mr. GRAMS (for himself and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Hermann Monument and Hermann Heights

Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, as a national symbol of

the contributions of Americans of German heritage.

Whereas there are currently more than 57,900,000 individuals of German heritage residing in the United States,

who comprise nearly 25 percent of the population of the

United States and are therefore the largest ethnic group

in the United States;

Whereas those of German heritage are not descendants of

only 1 political entity, but of all German-speaking areas;

Whereas Americans of German heritage have made countless

contributions to American culture, arts, and industry, the

American military, and American government;
2

•SCON 106 IS

Whereas there is no nationally recognized tangible symbol

dedicated to German Americans and their positive contributions to the United States;

Whereas the story of Hermann the Cheruscan parallels that

of the American Founding Fathers, because he was a

freedom fighter who united ancient German tribes in

order to shed the yoke of Roman tyranny and preserve

freedom for the territory of present-day Germany;

Whereas the Hermann Monument located in Hermann

Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, was dedicated in

1897 to honor the spirit of freedom and was later dedicated to all German immigrants who settled in New Ulm

and elsewhere in the United States; and

Whereas the Hermann Monument has been recognized as a

site of special historical significance by the United States

Government, by inclusion on the National Register of

Historic Places: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Hermann Monument and Hermann

3 Heights Park in New Ulm, Minnesota, is recognized by

4 Congress as a national symbol of the contributions of

5 Americans of German heritage.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-1906
CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INCORPORATED, Petitioner, and ARTHUR CARPENTER, Claimant, versus DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (01-841) Submitted: March 4, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Robert A. Rapaport, Dana Adler Rosen, CLARKE, DOLPH, RAPAPORT, HARDY & HULL, P.L.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Petitioner. Eugene Scalia, Acting Solicitor of Labor, John F. Depenbrock, Associate Solicitor for Employee Benefits, Burke Wong, Whitney R. Given, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ceres Marine Terminals seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of special fund relief under § 8(f) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 908(f) (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evide nce. See Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. DOWCP , No. 01-841 (BRB July 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The petition for review is accordingly

DENIED .
September 17, 2015

Mr. Adam Davis

President

Ozark Gateway Regional Tourism Association

P.O. Box 4049

Batesville, AR 72503

Dear Mr. Davis :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

T itle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your e xemption request on behalf of Ozark Gateway Regional Tourism

Association filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2774 on July 7, 2015 , but we are unable to

process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps ans wer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Div ision

Enclosure s34
Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Forms S-8 (Nos.
33-88342, 333-103018, 333-116091 and 333-153316) of NYMAGIC, INC. of our reports dated March 12,
2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of NYMAGIC, INC. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on
Form 10-K of NYMAGIC, INC. and subsidiaries.
|   | 1. | I      am the Senior Vice-President and Chief Business and Financial Officer of      Neurogen Corporation (the"Company"). |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      the best of my knowledge: |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------|

|   | a. | The      Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008      accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and      Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the      "Exchange Act"); and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b. | The      information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: March 27,      2009 | By:      /s/ Thomas A. Pitler                                      |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Thomas      A. Pitler                                              |
|                            | Senior      Vice-President and Chief Business and FinancialOfficer |
|                            |                                                               |
|                            |                                                               |