alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


 


FIRST
AMENDMENT TO


LETTER AGREEMENT


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT TO LETTER
AGREEMENT, (this “First Amendment”), dated as of June 9, 2005, is entered
into by and between Accellent Inc., a Maryland corporation formerly known as UTI
Corporation (“Accellent” or the “Company”), and DLJ Merchant Banking III, Inc.
(“DLMBJ”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.            Accellent and DLJMB are parties to that certain letter
agreement dated June 30, 2004 (the “Letter Agreement”) by which DLJMB was
engaged to act as the Company’s financial advisor with respect to certain
services identified in the Letter Agreement.


 


B.            Accellent and DLJMB wish to amend the
Letter Agreement to increase the cap amount of certain fees which may be paid
to DLJMB from $750,000 to $1,750,000.


 


C.            Unless otherwise amended herein, capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Letter
Agreement.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing premises and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto amend the Letter Agreement as follows:


 


1.  Section 3(d) of the Letter Agreement
is hereby amended by deleting the reference in Section 3(d) to “$750,000”
and replacing it with “$1,750,000.”


 


2.  Other than the amendments and modifications
specifically contained herein, the Letter Agreement remains unmodified and in
full force and effect.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE
FOLLOWS]


 





















 


SIGNATURES


 


IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, Accellent and DLJMB have caused this First Amendment to be signed by
their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first
written above.


 


	
   

  	
  ACCELLENT INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Stewart A. Fisher

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
    Stewart A.
  Fisher

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
       Executive
  Vice President and

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
       Chief
  Financial Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  DLJ MERCHANT BANKING III, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Avinash
  Kenkare

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
    Avinash
  Kenkare

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
      

  
					



 


[SIGNATURE
PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT]
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 383

Extending the authorities relating to the Senate National Security Working

Group.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Extending the authorities relating to the Senate National

Security Working Group.

1 Resolved, That Senate Resolution 105 of the One

2 Hundred First Congress, agreed to April 13, 1989, as

3 amended by Senate Resolution 75 of the One Hundred

4 Sixth Congress, agreed to March 25, 1999, is further

5 amended by adding at the end the following new section:

6 ‘‘SEC. 4. The provisions of this resolution shall re7 main in effect until December 31, 2002.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  7
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements of NYMAGIC,  INC., as of December 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000847431
<NAME>                  NYMAGIC, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       297,293
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              0
<EQUITIES>                                  71,682
<MORTGAGE>                                       0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             396,710
<CASH>                                       1,017
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                         255,762
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       4,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             764,304
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         56,033
<POLICY-OTHER>                             425,469
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                             12,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    15,018
<OTHER-SE>                                 216,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               764,304
<PREMIUMS>                                  56,155
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         18,642
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                          12,504
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 238
<BENEFITS>                                  36,853
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                 11,077
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        19,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             21,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         16,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,413
<EPS-BASIC>                                   1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.69
<RESERVE-OPEN>                             213,589
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                         48,838
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                          (12,183)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                          11,517
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                            41,862
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                            196,865
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                    (12,183)



</TABLE>
Order entered September 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00901-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 97410CC

ORDER

On September 14, 2018, a supplemental clerk’s record reflecting Tina Montoya Hall has 

been substituted as counsel for appellant was filed. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk of the 

Court to substitute Ms. Hall as appellant’s counsel in place of Jenny C. Parks.

Appellant’s brief remains due October 3, 2018.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, Peter Stokes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Peter
              StokesPeter
                Stokes
                Chief
                  Executive Officer
                  May
                    8,
                    2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
You are here:EPA Home Compliance and Enforcement ECHOSearch Water Data Effluent Data
-This is searching PCS and ICIS-NPDES (all states). ECHO Logo Get Effluent Data (Water Program) Help Select a Permit Search Permit ID: (NPDES ID—9 characters)

Facility data (display only:) Permit ID Database Address
Status Designation Ownership Select Charts Search All Charts with violations Discharge points All Parameters All Monitoring locations All Effluents only Outfall types All Effluents only Sampling periods All Select Dates Search From to Effluent data available: PCS: Jan 2008 – Mar 2012

ICIS-NPDES: Apr 2007 – Mar 2012 Get the Data Search 

## Enforcement & Compliance History Online (ECHO) file:///M:/Project/Nutrients%20-%20OST/4%20-%20FL%20Estuary%20Criteria/15%20-%20Economic%20Analysis /1%20-%20Econ%20References/New/Cost%20Calculations%20references/US%20EPA%202011.htm Last updated on Wednesday, July 18, 2012 CWA Effluent Query file:///M:/Project/Nutrients - OST/4 - FL Estuary Criteria/15 - Economic...

1 of 1 11/21/2012 9:26 AM
#### Ronol MENDOZA MADOSES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0925.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 9, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Thomas F. Ball, III, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order revoking appellant’s probation and a sentence of twenty-six months’ imprisonment.

It is contended on appeal that the sentence is erroneous because at the sentencing hearing the trial judge announced the sentence as twenty months’ imprisonment rather than twenty-six months. However, in reducing the sentence to writing it was fixed at twenty-six months. Of course, the oral pronouncement takes precedence over the written sentence because the written sentence is merely a record of the sentence pronounced in open court. *Kelly v. State,*414 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); *Evans v. State,*490 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Therefore the written sentence should be corrected to comply with the oral sentence.

The parties agree that the court erred in not filing a written order of revocation and that the cause should be remanded for entry of such an order. *Jordan v. State,*489 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

Accordingly, the order appealed from is affirmed but the sentence is reversed and remanded for entry of the appropriate *1133sentence and for a written order of revocation of probation.

DOWNEY, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.
steam

_ record - Re: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an ex tension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agre es to the extension and establishes a new date.
Sincerely,

-----"Marks, Jeffrey Allen" <jmarks@rrienergy.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Marks, Jeffrey Allen" <jmarks@rrienergy.com> Date: 06/25/2010 04:55PM Subject: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Marks, Jeffrey Alle n" <jmarks@rrienergy.com> Date: 6/28/2010 3:54 PM Sub j ect: Re: RRI - Titus Request for ICR Extension Pa g e 1 of 2

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28C5C5D

...Alicea,

Please find attached RRI Energy – Titus generating fa cility correspondence for EPA’s consideration to extend the dea dline to complete and comply for Effluent ICR requirements.

If there are any que stions, do not hesitat e to contact me.

Jeffrey A. Marks

Titus – General M anager, (610) 378-8402

[ attachment "RRI - Titus IC R Extension Request Letter. pdf" removed by Jezebele A licea/DC/USEPA/US] Pa g e 2 of 2

3/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C28C5C5D

...
From: Hofmeister, Art

Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:44 PM

To: 'Baldyga, Lyndsey'

Cc: Forney, Katy; Ceron, Heather

Subject: Additional Info

Hi, Lyndsey:

Can you give us an idea of when we can expect to receive the following information?

1) The proposed apportioning methodology for the STG; and

2) Whether the proposed GHG BACT limits for the CTs/HRSGs are acceptable (for including periods

of startup/shutdown)?

Ideally, we would like to have it by Sept. 9 th so that we can keep to our current sc hedule to go to public

notice by Sept. 13 th

.

Thanks.

Art Hofmeister

Environmental Engineer

Air Permits Section

EPA Region 4

(404) 562

- 9115
#### METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellant, v. Ana MARINO, Appellee.

No. 87-2512.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 21, 1988.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty., and Gary Siplin, Asst. Co. Atty., for appellant.

Friedman and Friedman, Miami Beach, Daniels and Hicks and Patrice A. Talisman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Concluding that the trial court’s instruction to disregard the arguably inadmissible testimony sufficiently cured any prejudice that may have resulted from its admission, and that, therefore, a mistrial was not warranted, we affirm the judgment under review. *State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Guthrie,*321 So.2d 116 (Fla.3d DCA 1975); *Compania Dominicana de Aviacion v. Knapp,*251 So.2d 18 (Fla.3d DCA 1971).

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 3.1**

 

**ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT**

 

**TO THE**

 

**ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**

 

**OF**

 

**THE FLOORING ZONE, INC.**

 

The Flooring Zone, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Nevada, on May 5, 2003, hereby adopts the following Articles of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 78 of Nevada Revised Statutes (the “Statute”), Sections 78.385 and 78.390.

**I**

|   | The Articles of Incorporation shall be amended to read as follows: |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ARTICLE I**

**NAME**

 

|   | The name of the corporation is: Profire Energy, Inc. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|

**II**

 

The date of the adoption of the foregoing amendment by written consent of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company was October 31, 2008.  The number of shares outstanding in the Corporation and entitled to vote on the amendment was 45,000,000.   All stock in the Corporation is entitled to one vote per share for each matter coming before the meeting of the shareholders.   The number of shares that approved the amendment by written consent in lieu of a meeting was 36,825,150.  

|   | IN WITNESS HEREOF, this Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation has been |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

executed on this 8th day of December, 2008.

By:  /s/ Andrew Limpert 

|   | Andrew Limpert |
|--------|----------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
#### STATE ex rel. Alton McCLOUD v. Hon. Frank SHEA, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 87-KH-0404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re McCloud, Alton; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

Denied. Moot. Relator’s appeal is now pending before this Court and counsel has been appointed to represent relator on appeal.
### SERVE D JUN E 22 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTH EMATTE RO F BRAV O AVIATION , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10SO000 6 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No
. FA A 201 0 - 032 0
NOTIC EO FHEARIN GDATE S Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O no r before Augus t

21 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discover y including , bu t

not limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio nrequest s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discover y disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i natimel y manner.. . NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVE Ntha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o nSeptembe r

3,2010 , inclusive , i nth e Nationa l Transportatia o Safet y Boar d Courtroom , 151 5 W
. 190tl i ST
. St e 555 , Gardena , C A 90248
. Settle dcase s wil l no t b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s)
. Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expresjuataitn^ourie r o r posta l service
. •-'•r:ri i

tichar dC
. Gloodwin U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP10SO000 6 | (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Robert J
. Culle n Brav o Aviation , Inc. , Responden t 700 0 Merril l Avenue , Suit e 3 1 Chino,C A 9171 0 TEL : 909-606-860 5 FAX : 909-606-863 9 Christophe r

R
. Stevenson , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f Regiona l Counse l SouthernRegion , ASO- 7 Federal Aviatio nAdministratio n P.O
. Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l AviationAdministration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HA R P R E E T S I NG H T HIND , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74430 A ge nc yN o. A 075- 252- 584 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t23, 2010 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , H A W K IN S , an dT H O M A S , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H a rpr e e tS i ngh T hi nd, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndi a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen r e m ova l pr oc e e di ngs . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or 

# FI LED SEP 07 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74430 2 ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n , H

e v . G on zales , 501 F . 3d 1128, 1130- 31 ( 9th C i r . 2007) , a nd we d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng T hi nd ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y bec ause T hi nd fi l ed i tnear l y tw o years af t erthe B IA i ss ued i t s f

i nal o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and T hi nd fa i l ed t o d em on strat e c hang ed c ountryc ondi t i ons t o qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the t i m e l i m i tf or f ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; se e al so T ou f i gh iv. Mukasey , 5 3 8 F .3 d9 8 8 , 9 9 6 - 9 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( u n d e r ly in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ility det erm i nat i on re nd er ed evi dence of changed cou ntrycond i t i on s i m m at er i al ). W e de c l i ne t o r e c ons i de rT hi nd’ s c ont e nt i ons r e ga r di ng the B I A ’ s Jul y18, 2005, or de ra f

f i rm i ng the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on, be c aus e thi s c ourtpr e vi ous l yde c i de d thos e i s s ue s i n T hi ndv. G on zales , 218 F e d. A p p x . 6 0 7 ( 9 th C ir . J a n . 1 6 , 2 0 0 7 ) . See Merri t t v. M acke y , 932 F . 2d 1317, 1320 ( 9th C i r . 1991) ( e xpl a i ni ng tha tunde rthe “ l a w of the c a s e doc tr i ne , ” one pa ne l of a n appe l l a t e c ourtw i l l notr e c ons i de rque s t i ons w hi c h a nothe rpa ne l ha s de c i de d on a pri or appeal i n the sam e c as e) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Quarterly Report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
November 12, 2010

By:
/s/ Andrew LimpertAndrew LimpertChief Financial Officer