alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of IFSA  Strongman,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jussi Laurimaa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2006                 By: /s/ Jussi Laurimaa
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Jussi Laurimaa
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       12
#### William G. Siegfried et al., Doing Business as Siegfried Home Builders, Plaintiffs, *v.*David L. Katz, Defendant.

County Court, Oneida County,

March 20, 1959.

*650
      *G. Edward La Gatta*for defendant.

*Griffith & P Hechas (Joseph Pileclcas*of counsel), for plaintiffs.

John J. Walsh, J.

This is a motion to compel arbitration and for a stay of a proceeding pending in Oneida County Court.

Defendant contends that by the terms of a building contract, *“*any disagreement arising out of this agreement or from a breach thereof, shall promptly be submitted to arbitrators selected as hereinafter provided; and the decision of the arbitrators shall be a condition precedent to any right or legal action that either party may have against the other, arising out of this agreement.”

Plaintiffs are suing for what they claim are “ extras ” not encompassed within the contract.

Defendant claims that the items sued on are not extras, but arise out of the contract, and that in addition, he has certain counterclaims against plaintiffs arising out of the contract.

While plaintiffs concede that defendant might arbitrate such counterclaims, they oppose the motion for arbitration made on the complaint, no answer having been served.

While the situation is not without some doubt, it seems that arbitration is a proper procedure even if the so-called ‘ ‘ extras ’ ’ are alone considered. *“*The arbitration clause provides for the submission of *‘*all questions that may arise under this contract *and in the performance*of the work thereunder.’ We know by common experience the class of questions to which this language naturally applies. It applies as stated to questions arising under and in the performance of a contract and such questions are those which involve an interpretation of its provisions for the purpose of determining whether work has been done according to the contract, whether work which has been demanded under the contract is really covered by its provisions or constitutes extra work, when payments become due, and so on. All of these questions involve recognition of the contract and not repudiation of it.” *(Matter of Young*v. *Crescent Development Co.,*240 N. *Y.*244, 248.)

Motion is granted and stay continued. Submit order.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                         Independent Auditors' Consent
                         -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Neurogen Corporation:


We consent to the use of our report dated February 12, 1996, relating to the
balance sheet of Neurogen Corporation as of December 31, 1995, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the
years in the two-year period ended December 31, 1995 which report appears in the
December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Neurogen Corporation.


                                                 KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Hartford, Connecticut
March 28, 1997
Order entered August 26, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00797-CV 

IN RE GEARBOX SOFTWARE, LLC AND RANDALL PITCHFORD, II 

Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 162nd District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-19179 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Carlyle, and Osborne 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relators’ petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/s/ CORY CARLYLE 

 JUSTICE
January 4, 2015

From: Skyward IO, on behalf of Tri­City Drone Services

To: FAA 9­awa­avs­333exemptions@faa.gov

Subject: Statement of Public Interest re docket FAA­2015­4177 (Tri­City Drone Services)

Skyward IO submitted a petition for exemption per Section 333 of the 2012 FMRA on

behalf of Tri­City Drone Services of Davenport, Iowa (dated July 10, 2015). Tri­City Drone

Services is a subsidiary of Tri­City Electric Co (http://www.tricityelectric.com/), a major electrical

contractor located in the midwest. A letter was sent to Tri­City Drone Services by the FAA

(dated December 14,2015) stating that the petition could not be processed because it was

missing information regarding the benefit to public interest of granting the exemption.

The original petition included a statement of public interest on page 9 of the cover letter

which is similar to that of petitions for which exemptions were granted (summary in separate

document). Similar exemptions granted include the following

● AECOM (Exemption: 11808; Docket: FAA­2015­0473 )

● Skyview Aerial (Exemption: 11920; Docket: FAA­2015­1276 )

● Monterey Drone (Exemption: 11271; Docket: FAA­2014­0919 )

● Bechtel (Exemption: 11258; Docket: FAA­2014­0898 )

● Clayco (Exemption: 11109 ; Docket: FAA­2014­0507 )

● Classic Neighborhood Development (Exemption: 14077; Docket:

FAA­2015­4535 )

Additional Information Regarding Public Interest

Tri­City Drone Services proposed operations reduces the risks associated with the

conduct of surveys and inspections of construction projects and enables new types of surveys

and inspections. This will directly benefit the public by reducing the likelihood of injury to active

participants and bystanders which would otherwise be present when conventional methods

such as manned aircraft, cranes, scaffolding, harnesses, or person lifting equipment are used.

In addition these surveys will generally be able to be completed much more quickly which will

have direct economic benefit to the public by reducing project timelines and costs.
The use of sUAS will enable new types of surveys and inspections that would not

otherwise be feasible using conventional methods. This will help assure the reliability and

safety of critical infrastructure such as electrical supply to hospitals, the integrity of industrial

plant distributed equipment, and the health of renewable energy infrastructure. Tri­City Electric

has and will continue to be a major contractor in these areas and by extension its subsidiary

Tri­City Drone Services has significant knowledge and experience which will benefit the public

as a whole.

Submitted on Behalf of Tri­City Drone Services

Tariq Rashid

exemption@skyward.io

Skyward IO
Exhibit 10.1(b)


         Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (new financing) Issued by
               NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on August 8, 2005


                                                                     Conversion
        Issue Date           Due Date           Principal              Price
      -------------      --------------      ---------------       -------------
        08/08/05            02/08/06         $  5,000,000             $ 0.01
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen E. Carley, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|  

|Date: May 14, 2007 |  |                             
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|                  
|                  
|                   |  | /s/
	      Stephen E. Carley
|                   |  | Stephen E. Carley
President 
|                   |  | EPL Intermediate, Inc.      

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will
be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Miguel Santos ORIHUELA.

No. 86-K-1955.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Orihuela, Miguel Santos; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17946-KA; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 40086.

Prior report: La.App., 494 So.2d 347.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 256

Designating the week of February 14–18, 2000, as ‘‘National Heart Failure

Awareness Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr.

BAYH, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. BIDEN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BREAUX, Mr. L.

CHAFEE, Mr. CLELAND, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. CRAIG, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. ENZI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. KERRY, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LUGAR,

Mr. MACK, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REED, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SHELBY, Mr.

SMITH of Oregon, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. SNOWE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSON,

Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. LIEBERMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the week of February 14–18, 2000, as ‘‘National

Heart Failure Awareness Week’’.

Whereas the primary goals of ‘‘National Heart Failure

Awareness Week’’ are—

(1) to promote research related to all aspects of

heart failure and provide a forum for presentation of

that research;
2

•SRES 256 ATS

(2) to educate heart failure caregivers and patients

through programs, publications, and other media allowing for more effective treatment and diagnosis of heart

failure; and

(3) to enhance the quality and duration of life for

those with heart failure;

Whereas heart failure, a disease of the heart muscle, is of

epidemic proportions in the United States;

Whereas as of January 1, 2000, approximately 4,600,000

Americans had been diagnosed with congestive heart failure, and an estimated 450,000 more cases will be diagnosed in the year 2000;

Whereas coronary artery disease is a cause in approximately

50 percent of the cases of patients with heart failure, and

in such cases, patients often have heart attacks or require bypass surgery;

Whereas the incidence of heart failure increases with age and

is the most frequent cause of hospitalization for individuals over the age of 65;

Whereas the prognosis for those diagnosed with heart failure

is not promising, as less than 50 percent of patients live

more than 5 years after their initial diagnosis; and

Whereas it is vital that the American public become aware of

the enormous impact of heart failure, and be better educated regarding the signs and symptoms of the disease:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) in recognition of all the individuals who

3 have devoted time and energy toward increasing
3

•SRES 256 ATS

1 public awareness and education on heart failure,

2 designates the week of February 14–18, 2000, as

3 ‘‘National Heart Failure Awareness Week’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling on the people of the United States to

6 observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and

7 activities.

Æ
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0385

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM256AD

MMEL TR 01-27/04Z, I2 --- 7/09

MMEL TR 01-27/05Z, I2 --- 7/09

SAGEM 418-27-011, R1 --- 1/28/10

SAGEM 6259-27-006, R1 --- 6/23/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           361,250
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     59,258
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 438,591
<CASH>                                         1,042
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             175,658
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         5,567
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 707,903
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            55,155
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 388,402
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                22,458
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,992
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,527
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   707,903
<PREMIUMS>                                     87,537
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            21,325
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             10,425
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 293
<BENEFITS>                                     50,768
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    16,583
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           16,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            26,368
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,368
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.67
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 227,370
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            72,322
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (21,874)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             17,029
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               38,454
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                222,335
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (21,874)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended June 30, 2007 of the Claymore MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.








Date:
      August 14, 2007


/s/
                  Samuel Masucci, III
                
                Samuel
                  Masucci, III
                On
                  behalf of the Registrant
                and
                  as Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**REAL MEX RESTAURANTS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick F.Wolfe, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

August 8, 2005 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ FREDERICK F.  WOLFE                  |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                                     |
|   |   | Frederick F.  Wolfe                      |
|   |   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,950,730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,133,406
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,789,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,657,327
<PP&E>                                      11,954,954
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,935,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,658,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,975,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    499,920
<COMMON>                                       169,056
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,718,873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,658,199
<SALES>                                     32,619,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,619,706
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,872,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,906,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (24,159,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (24,159,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (500,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (24,659,288)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.57)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**** **

**Neurogen Corporation**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows: 

-  I am the Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer of Neurogen Corporation (the "Company").     
-  To the best of my knowledge: 

 The Company's Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and 
 The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Date: April 29, 2005 | By:   | /s/ Stephen R. Davis         Stephen R. Davis         Executive Vice President and        Chief Business Officer |
|----------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Wayne BURLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-704.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 16, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for delivery, possession and conspiracy to deliver cocaine. There is ample evidence to support the convictions for sale and possession. There is inadequate evidence to support the conspiracy conviction. The conspiracy statute says:

> Whoever agrees, conspires, combines, or confederates with another person or persons to commit any offense commits the offense of criminal conspiracy ...

The state proved that an informant walked up to Burley and asked him if he was selling cocaine. He said no and took him to Gray. The informant handed money to Burley who handed it to Gray who handed cocaine to Burley who handed it to the informant. Gray and Burley were then arrested. There was no proof of any prearrangement, any prior discussions or plans or anything else done in preparation for the above events. No proof they conspired together to commit the crime or did anything other than engage in the one transaction.

This absence of proof requires that this court reverse the judgment of conviction for conspiracy.

*1022AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.