alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 323

Designating Monday, June 19, 2000, as National Eat-Dinner-With-YourChildren Day.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 2000

Mr. BIDEN (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr.

BRYAN, Mr. KENNEDY, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. SESSIONS,

Mr. DEWINE, Mr. HELMS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr.

INOUYE) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating Monday, June 19, 2000, as National EatDinner-With-Your-Children Day.

Whereas the use of illegal drugs and the abuse of substances

such as alcohol and nicotine constitute the single greatest

threat to the health and well-being of American children;

Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University have

found for each of the past 4 years that children and teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families are far

less likely to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas teenagers from families that seldom eat dinner together are 72 percent more likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;
2

•SRES 323 ATS

Whereas teenagers from families that eat dinner together are

31 percent less likely than the average teenager to use

illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;

Whereas the correlation between the frequency of family dinners and the decrease in substance abuse risk is well documented;

Whereas parental influence is known to be one of the most

crucial factors in determining the likelihood of teenage

substance abuse; and

Whereas family dinners have long constituted a substantial

pillar of American family life: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes that eating dinner as a family is

3 a critical step toward raising healthy, drug-free chil4 dren; and

5 (2) designates Monday, June 19, 2000, as Na6 tional Eat-Dinner-With-Your-Children Day.

Æ
### NU M BER 13- 08- 027- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG
GERA RD O L OZA NO D/B /A B RID E’S GA LL ERY , A pp ellan t,
v . COMM ERC E OF FIC E PA RK ON E, L .P., A pp ellee.
On a p p ea l f ro m th e C o u n ty C o u rta t L awN o . 4 of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas . 

## ME MOR A ND UM OP IN ION Be fo re Ch ief Ju stice Va lde z an d Ju stice s Ga rza an d Be na v ide s

M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lan t, Gerardo Loz ano d/b/a Bri de’ s Gal ler y , has f il ed an unoppos ed motion to dis mis s h is appeal on g ro unds that the p arti es hav e reache d an ag re ement t o s ettl e and com prom ise the ir differen ces. App ellantrequests tha t this Court dism iss the ap pea l.2

Th e C o u rt , hav ing co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e and appel lan t’ s u noppos ed moti on to di smi ss the appeal , i s o f the opini on that the moti on s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1(a). Appell ant’ s u noppos ed moti on to di smi ss i s g ra nted, and the a ppeal ishereby D ISM ISSE D. I n ac cordance w it h the ag re ement of the parti es, co stsare taxed ag ain st the par

ty inc ur ri ng sa me. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1( d)( "Abse nt ag re ement of the par ti es, the cour

t w il l tax co stsag ain st the a ppel lan t.")

. Hav ing di smi ss ed th e a p p e a l at appel lan t' s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h. P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 12th day

of June, 2008.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ecolocap Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michel St-Pierre, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 13thday of August, 2009                                                                                                                   
|   

MICHEL ST-PIERREMichel St-PierreChief Financial Officer














---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000848101
<NAME>                        Vision Ten, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         8,760
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  210,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (123,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    267,048
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               362,844
<PP&E>                                         53,031
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (53,031)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,844
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,896
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       152,310
<OTHER-SE>                                     (773,362)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (621,052)
<SALES>                                        255,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,643
<CGS>                                          416,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  416,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               57,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (218,540)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (218,540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.00)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of NYMAGIC,  INC. (the  "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, George R. Trumbull,
III,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section  13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.





/s/ George R. Trumbull, III
---------------------------
George R. Trumbull, III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
March 16, 2005
<PAGE>
'
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Presstek, Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ending January 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Moosa
E. Moosa, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


                                           /s/  Moosa E. Moosa
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                             Moosa E. Moosa
                           Vice President -- Finance and Chief Financial Officer
                                (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: March 18, 2004
|   | 1. | The      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Corporation. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Stephen A.      Weintraub                                                                               |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen A. Weintraub                                                                                        |   |
| Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Corporate Secretary |   |

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Samuel HULL.

No. 87-KH-0249.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Hull, Samuel; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D” No. 248-278.

Denied. Relator must first file in the district court for relief.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 5, 2009



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
#### Minnie A. Cary, Respondent, *v.*Arthur L. Cary, Appellant.

*Cary*v. *Cary,*168 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided March 7, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 5,1915, which modified and affirmed as modified *671an order of Special Term denying a motion for judgment in favor of plaintiff for unpaid alimony and granting a motion by defendent for the annulment of the provisions of a final decree of divorce with regard to the payment of alimony from the time of the plaintiff’s remarriage. The only question presented herein is whether the plaintiff, notwithstanding her marriage, is entitled to a judgment for the unpaid alimony down to the time of the defendant’s application to annul the provisions for the payment of the same.

*Thomas Moore Simonton*for appellant.

*Henry A. Uterhart*and *Alfred M. Schaffer*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., and Cardozo, J. Not voting: Seabury, J.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 9, 2015

No. 04-14-00813-CV

IN RE PRECISION SHOOTING EQUIPMENT, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus on November 21, 2014, complaining of 

the trial court’s failure to rule on a pending motion. This court has been advised that the trial 

court has since ruled on the pending motion which is the subject of this mandamus proceeding. 

Accordingly, this original mandamus proceeding is reinstated and DISMISSED AS 

MOOT. 

It is so ORDERED on March 9, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court 

.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV-1280, styled Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc. v. Manuel Medina 

III, Individually and d/b/a M3 Outfitters, pending in the County Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Joe Rathmell 

presiding.
##### 



Exhibit 10.B

Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Real Estate Financial Services
SC1098
16 Broad Street
Post Office Box 700
Charleston, SC 29401


(WACHOVIA LOGO)
    
    WACHOVIA


December 17, 2003

Mr. Steven P. Birdwell Chief Financial Officer
Sea Pines Company, Inc. Post Office Box 7000
Hilton Head, SC 29938

RE:  Net Worth Covenant Waiver for Year Ended October 31, 2004

Dear Steve:

You have informed us that the Net Worth Ratio of the Company
is projected to be above the maximum level as of October 31, 2004, as required by Section 8.02(a) (i) of the Amended
and Restated Master Credit Agreement dated October 31, 2002.
This deficiency represents an event of default as that term
is used in the Agreement. The Bank hereby waives the
requirement that the Borrower maintain the Net Worth Ratio
specified by Section 8.02(a) (i) of the Agreement for the
fiscal year ending October 31, 2004.

The Lender hereby reserves all other rights and remedies it
may have against the Borrower under the Master Credit
Agreement. This waiver does not extend to any other covenant
contained in the Master Credit Agreement, and shall not be
deemed to be a waiver of, or acquiescence or consent of the
Lender to any other default now or hereafter under the Master
Credit Agreement.

(-s- Timothy S. Blake)

Timothy
S. Blake Vice President Wachovia Bank, N.A.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-29,547-08

EX PARTE ROBERT LEE DAVIS, Relator

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NOS. 9408436-E AND 9408436-F 

IN THE 339TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the 339th District Court of Harris County challenging cause numbers 9408436-E and 9408436-F.

The trial court entered orders designating issues in both causes on February 1, 2013 and January 6,

2014, respectively. These applications have yet been forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the Judge of the 339th District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the records on such habeas corpus applications. In

the alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the orders designating issues and then
2

have the District Clerk submit the records on such applications. In either case, Respondent’s answer

shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ

of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted a response.

Filed: October 8, 2014

Do not publish
#### Larry C. DAWSON v. SHELL CHEMICAL COMPANY.

No. 86-CC-1099.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

Reconsideration Granted July 29, 1986.

In re Dawson, Larry C.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-86-0308; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 33978.

Not considered. The application is untimely, and the judgment is definitive. La.C.C.P. art. 2166.
# © i^SI s Memorandu m
us . Departmen t o f Itansportatio n - '• ' --'' H 2 5 ? ^ (? : ? r Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject : Reques t

for Extensions , Docket s DOT-OST-2002

- Date

- Apri l 25 , 201 2 U37 8 & DOT-OST-2005-2045 4 From : Denni s J
. DgVany , Chie f < y Repl y to S'^o " P^""' ' ^"^^ EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division, X-5 3 Attn, of : ^^^

- ^^^^" ^ To : Docket s Operations , M-3 0

B y Orde r 2012-3-14 , issue do n Marc h 23 , 2012 , th e Departmen t requeste dproposal s fro mintereste d ai r carrier s t o serv e Staunton , Virginia , an dVictoria , Texas , unde r th e Essentia l Ai r

Servic e (EAS ) program , t o b e submitte dn o late r than Apri l 25 , 2012
. O n Apri l 22 , Silve r Airway s requeste dan extensio n t o submi t

proposal s t o serv e Staunto n t o o n o r abou t May 9 , 2012
. Additionally , o n Apri l 24 , 2012 , Victori aRegiona l Airport requeste da

n extensio n of

fourtee n (14 ) days , fro m Apri l 2 5 t o May 9 , i n orde r t o allo w prospectiv e ai r carrier s additiona l tim e t o perfor mmarke t analysis
. I n a n e-mai l date dApri l 22 , 2012 , th e airport manage r a t Shenandoah Valle y Regiona l Airport expresse dthat

th e airport

ha s n o objection s t o th e requeste dextension
. W e are hereb y grantin g th e extensio n requests . Th e proposal s for Staunton , VA , an dVictoria , TX , are no w du e n o late r than May 9 , 2012
.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months period
      ended March 31, 2007 of the Claymore MACROshares Oil Down Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.











Date:
      May
      17, 2007





/s/
      Samuel Masucci, III


Samuel
      Masucci, III


On
      behalf
      of the Registrant


and
      as
      Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Willie R. BOLEN v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0056.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Bolen, Willie R.; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or ha-beas corpus; Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 15066; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18856-KH.

Denied.
#### Charmaine Horn ALARIO v. Alan Dean ALARIO.

No. 86-CA-425.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

April 13, 1987.

*191Victor E. Bradley, Jr., Norco, for plaintiff-appellee.

Joel T. Chaisson II, Destrehan, for defendant-appellant.

Before KLIEBERT, BOWES and GAUDIN, JJ.

GAUDIN, Judge.

In this domestic proceeding, appellant-husband Alan D. Alario argues on appeal that the district judge erred (1) in finding him in contempt of court for not paying, as ordered, second mortgage payments and (2) in sentencing him (Alario) to six months in parish prison.

Alario contends that he was financially unable to pay the second mortgage note of $1,000.00 in addition to $850.00 alimony and child support. He did not file a rule to reduce, he said, in the mistaken belief that he and his former wife, Charmaine, could amicably work out a solution.

While the trial judge’s monetary awards to Mrs. Alario may arguably be high, there was, admittedly, no motion to lessen these financial burdens. Mr. Alario did not pay any amount on the second mortgage. We cannot say that the finding of contempt was erroneous.

The six-month sentence, however, is excessive. LSA-R.S. 13:4611 limits contempt sentences for disobeying an order for payment of alimony and/or child support to three months. An order to pay a second mortgage note, under instant circumstances, is analogous to alimony and/or child support and subject to the same statutory limitations notwithstanding Mrs. Alario’s assertion that Mr. Alario’s contempt was continuing and subjected him to imprisonment until he complied with the court order.

Accordingly, we affirm the finding of contempt and set aside the six-month sentence. This matter is remanded for resen-tencing, with Mr. Alario to bear the costs of this appeal.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED. ■
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 11, 2018

Order 

Clerk

October 11, 2018

158078(29)

BRENDA R. WHITE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 158078

v COA: 342657 

MCAC: 17-000015

EDS CARE MANAGEMENT LLC, and 

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to waive filing fees 

is DENIED. In accordance with this Court’s orders in No. 157197, White v Southeast MI 

Surgical Hosp, and No. 157199, White v OL Matthews, MD, the plaintiff-appellant is not 

entitled to a waiver of the filing fee. The plaintiff-appellant must pay the filing fee within 

28 days of the date of this order or the application for leave to appeal will be 

administratively dismissed.