alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elma WELLS v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the MILITARY DEPARTMENT.

No. 88-C-0958.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1988.

In re Wells, Elma; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of *1049Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR86-1244; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 130864.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 778.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rotoblock
Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Scholl, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date:  March 14, 2005         /s/ Peter Scholl
                              -----------------------------------------
                              By: Peter Scholl, Chief Executive Officer













<PAGE>
#### STATE ex rel. Robert BROUSSARD v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1239.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Broussard, Robert; applying for writ of habeas corpus and motions to suppress evidence; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, Nos. 24698, 25046, 24699 and 25048.

Denied. Relator filed an identical pleading in the district court when he filed this *76matter with the Court. The trial court must be given an opportunity to rule on relator’s motion.
391 A.2d 678

#### Commonwealth v. Carr, Appellant.

Submitted March 20, 1978.

William J. Mazzola, and Stack & Gallagher, for appellant; No appearance entered nor brief submitted for Commonwealth, appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Case remanded for filing of post-verdict motions nunc pro tunc. *See, Commonwealth v. Cathey,*477 Pa. 446, 384 A.2d 589 (1978).
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 34

Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 23 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 1999

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign

Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on September 29, 1899;

Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans of the Armed Forces who served overseas in World

War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the Persian Gulf

War, and Bosnia; and

Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary and unselfish service to the Armed Forces and to

veterans, communities, States, and the Nation and has

worked toward the betterment of veterans in general and

society as a whole: Now, therefore, be it
2

•SJ 34 IS

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress—

4 (1) recognizes the historic significance of the

5 100th anniversary of the founding of the Veterans

6 of Foreign Wars of the United States (the VFW);

7 (2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that

8 milestone;

9 (3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 vet10 erans who belong to the VFW and thanks them for

11 their service to their fellow veterans and the Nation;

12 and

13 (4) calls upon the President to issue a procla14 mation recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and

15 the contributions made by the VFW to veterans and

16 the Nation and calling upon the people of the United

17 States to observe such anniversary with appropriate

18 ceremonies and activities.

Æ
# Den Europæiske Unions C 123A/16.

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 123A |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 63. årgang16. april 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 123A

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

63. årgang16. april 2020

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | Berigtigelser |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: EPSO/AD/375/20 — Dansksprogede (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/376/20 — Græsksprogede (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/377/20 — Fransksprogede (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/378/20 — Kroatisksprogede (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/379/20 — Polsksprogede (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 72 A af 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Indhold

Side

Berigtigelser

2020/C 123 A/01

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: EPSO/AD/375/20 — Dansksprogede (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/376/20 — Græsksprogede (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/377/20 — Fransksprogede (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/378/20 — Kroatisksprogede (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/379/20 — Polsksprogede (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7) ( EUT C 72 A af 5.3.2020 )

( EUT C 72 A af 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Berigtigelser

| 16.4.2020 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CA 123/1

---

Berigtigelse til meddelelse om almindelig udvælgelsesprøve: EPSO/AD/375/20 — Dansksprogede (DA) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/376/20 — Græsksprogede (EL) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/377/20 — Fransksprogede (FR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/378/20 — Kroatisksprogede (HR) juristlingvister (AD 7); EPSO/AD/379/20 — Polsksprogede (PL) juristlingvister (AD 7)

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende C 72 A af 5. marts 2020
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

På side 1:

I stedet for:

»Ansøgningsfrist: den 7. april 2020, kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

læses:

læses:

»Ansøgningsfrist: den 5. maj 2020, kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

På side 6:

I stedet for:

I stedet for:

»Der søges online på EPSO's hjemmeside http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senest den:

7. april 2020, kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

læses:

læses:

»Der søges online på EPSO's hjemmeside http://jobs.eu-careers.eu senest den:

5. maj 2020, kl. 12.00 (middag) Bruxellestid.«

---
###### **Exhibit99.3**

 

**I-LINK  INCORPORATED**

 

# **OFFICER’SCERTIFICATION**

# **PURSUANTTO**

# **SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# **(18U.S.C. 1350)**

 

April 30, 2003

 

The undersigned Allan Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer ofI-Link Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connectionwith the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period endedDecember 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the bestof his knowledge:

 

1.   The Report is in fullcompliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.   The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operation of the Corporation.

 

 
|   | /s/ Allan Silber        |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Allan Silber            |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification



I, Stephen E. Carley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EPL Intermediate,
Inc. (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements and other financial information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report
any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal
control over financial reporting; and



5. The Companys
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen E. Carley
|                        |  |  |  | Stephen E. Carley    
|                        |  |  |  | President
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | February 14, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Brenton W. Hatch          |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   |   | Brenton W. Hatch              |   |
|   |              |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |              |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0057

IN THE MATTER OF:

D.A.T.

A Youth. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 16, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Jim Rice

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2021

06/07/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0057
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned,
Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stanley P.
Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

|                   |                                | 
|------------------ | ------------------------------ | 
|Date: May 10, 2011 |                                | 
|                   |                                | 
|                   | /s/ ALLEN S. GREENE            | 
|                   |                                | 
|                   | Allen
 S. Greene               | 
|                   | Chief
 Executive Officer       | 
|                   | (Principal
 Executive Officer) | 
|                   |                                | 
|                   | /s/ STANLEY
 P. WIRTHEIM       | 
|                   |                                | 
|                   | Stanley
 P. Wirtheim           | 
|                   | Chief
 Financial Officer       | 
|                   | (Principal
 Financial Officer) | 

---
Exhibit
10.7


 


Gaiam,
Inc.


Nonemployee
Director Compensation


 


	
  Event

  	
   

  	
  Compensation

  
	
  Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $3,000 per meeting

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Telephonic Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $1,000 per meeting

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $500 per meeting

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Telephonic
  Meeting Fee

  	
   

  	
  $250 per meeting

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Standing Committee
  Chairman’s Fee

  	
   

  	
  $1,000 annually
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7264

CALVIN PRESSLEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS CORCORAN, Warden; JOSEPH CURRAN,

Attorney General; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-

2378-L)

Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Pressley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Pressley appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See Pressley v. Corcoran, No. CA-00-2378-L

(D. Md. filed Aug. 11; entered Aug. 14, 2000). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Todd Weintraub, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Todd
      WeintraubTodd
      Weintraub
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                May
      7, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Lee Jeffreys, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Arlgood, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 5, 1958.

*453
      *Squadron & Alter (David Alter*and *Hubert Thurschwell*of counsel), for defendant.

*Abraham J. Hirschsprung*for plaintiff.

Jacob Markowitz, J.

Defendant moves for dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency. It agreed with plaintiff that the latter should secure grand bonus prizes to be awarded in a contest forming part of a T.Y. show produced by defendant. Plaintiff was to be paid a stated sum by the supplier. Defendant agreed, further, that if and when as a result of plaintiff’s effort a supplier, acceptable to the defendant were obtained, willing to provide the prize, upon terms and conditions formulated and agreed upon by these parties, the defendant would enter into a supplementary agreement with such supplier, such agreement to provide that defendant would distribute one prize per week for a period of 17 weeks, and that it was noncancelable and defendant would not cancel, breach or provoke a breach of the supplementary agreement. Plaintiff alleges performance in that it obtained one named supplier but defendant entered into a supplementary agreement with such supplier not containing the terms and provisions agreed upon and subsequently the defendant cancelled such supplementary agreement. It is further alleged that the supplier also performed until its agreement was cancelled by the defendant.

Defendant urges that plaintiff alleges upon a promise to make a future agreement which is too indefinite for legal enforcement. The agreement between the parties did specify the terms of a supplementary agreement. Since plaintiff was to exert efforts to produce suppliers and to incur expense, the agreement is instinct with an obligation to use good faith in utilizing the results of plaintiff’s effort. Thereupon, the making of a sup*454plementary agreement removed any claimed indefiniteness, and the obligation of the alleged agreement with the defendant attached with respect to any such supplementary agreement. It is' alleged that such supplementary agreement was made with the supplier produced by the plaintiff, and since plaintiff alleges due performance, it must be deemed that plaintiff produced the supplier willing to contract upon the agreed terms. It is urged, further, that there is no alleged promise by defendant to pay the plaintiff. It is not on such a promise which the action is based, but rather upon defendant’s promise not to cancel its agreement with the supplier whereby plaintiff’s compensation by the third party would be defeated. Plaintiff does not sue as a third-party beneficiary of the supplementary contract. The breach of that contract was, as alleged,'the fault of the defendant, and it in turn stands as a breach of defendant’s contract with plaintiff.

Since no other objection is raised, the motion is denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The following applicants filed AM or FM proposals to change the community of license: ALLIED COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK TWO, Station WDBA, Facility ID 176140, BMPED-20120227AAL, From CAPE MAY, NJ, To LEWES, DE; WESTERN NEW LIFE, INC., Station WNVE, Facility ID 3250, BPH-20120305AAW, From CULEBRA, PR, To CEIBA, PR.

# DATES:

The agency must receive comments on or before May 29, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tung Bui, 202-418-2700.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The full text of these applications is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the Commission's Reference Center, 445 12th Street SW., Washington, DC 20554 or electronically via the Media Bureau's Consolidated Data Base System,                     *http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/​prod/​cdbs/​pubacc/​prod/​cdbs_​pa.htm.*                     A copy of this application may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or                     *www.BCPIWEB.com.*

Federal Communications Commission.

James D. Bradshaw,

Deputy Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.

[FR Doc. 2012-7468 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P