alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 6 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 6

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, as a mark of respect to the memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative 
Clerk of the United States Senate, all flags of the United States 
located on Capitol Buildings or on the Capitol grounds shall be flown 
at half-staff on the day of his interment.

            Passed the Senate February 6, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. CON. RES. 6

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Authorizing flags located in the Capitol complex to be flown at half-
  staff in memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk of the United 
                             States Senate.
```
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Limpert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
August 13, 2012
By:
/s/ Andrew LimpertAndrew LimpertChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro
Distributing, Inc. (the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                       |  |  |  |                       
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ J.A. Cardwell, Sr.
|                       |  |  |  | (J.A. Cardwell, Sr.)  
|                       |  |  |  | President and Director
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 4, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Edward Escudero   
|                       |  |  |  | (Edward Escudero)     
|                       |  |  |  | Treasurer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Neurogen Corporation  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

- I am the President and Chief Executive Officer of Neurogen Corporation (the    "Company").    
- To the best of my knowledge:

> - The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,      2003 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities      and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and     
- The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   

By: /s/ William H. Koster

--------------------------  William H. Koster   President and   Chief Executive Officer   Date: March 15, 2004
TO: RCRA Docket EPA-HQ-RCRA-2012-0426

FROM: Richard Huggins Jr.

On January 18, 2012, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (ORCR) staff toured a Lowe’s, 

Advanced Auto Parts and Walmart store with representatives and members of the Retail Industry 

Leaders Association (RILA) to see firsthand how these retailers are complying with the Resource 

Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). ORCR staff were able to see technology used to map products, 

how hazardous wastes are accumulated, how hazardous waste are prepared to be sent off site and 

learned about a store’s hazardous waste program.

Attendees:

Richard Huggins Jr., Jamie Piziali, Kristin Fitzgerald, Priscilla Halloran, Tiffany Kohler, Jim O’Leary, Jessica 

Young (ORCR), David Nicholas (PARMS)

Adam Siegel, Kelly Kolb, Ben Hobbs (RILA)

Rob Gass, (Lowe’s)

Mike Stephenson (Walmart) 

Micah Thompson (Advance Auto Parts)
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

185) ll-K- (F) -13 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:54 AM Sheet 185 of 325 
P.2 

II-K-(F)-13 

IFCAM RESULTS FOR A "1.2 LB. S02" CASE. 

Letter from E. Medine, EEA to D. Carter, DOE.EV. 

February 25, 1981. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(F)-13
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 205

Designating the week of each November in which the holiday of Thanksgiving

is observed as ‘‘National Family Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19, 1999

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. KOHL, Mr. TORRICELLI, and Mr. LUGAR)

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee

on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the week of each November in which the holiday

of Thanksgiving is observed as ‘‘National Family Week’’.

Whereas the family is the basic strength of any free and orderly society;

Whereas it is appropriate to honor the family unit as essential to the continued well-being of the United States; and

Whereas it is fitting that official recognition be given to the

importance of family loyalties and ties: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates the week of each November in

3 which the holiday of Thanksgiving is observed as

4 ‘‘National Family Week’’; and
2

•SRES 205 IS

1 (2) requests that the President issue each year

2 a proclamation—

3 (A) designating the week of each Novem4 ber in which the holiday of Thanksgiving is ob5 served as ‘‘National Family Week’’; and

6 (B) calling on the people of the United

7 States to observe ‘‘National Family Week’’ with

8 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
#### Kochmer Unemployment Compensation Case.

*137Argued December 14, 1961.

Before Rhodes, P. J., Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ.

*Maxwell P. G or son,*for appellant.

*Sydney Reuben,*Assistant Attorney General, with him *David Stahl,*Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

January 16, 1962:

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Frank Kochmer was last employed as a butcher by the Morrell Felin Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. His final day of work was February 26, 1960, on which date he had a valid separation. Kochmer thereafter filed an application for unemployment compensation, and received benefits for thirty weeks. On March 15, 1961, having had no intervening employment, he filed an application for benefits for a second benefit year, which was within ninety days after the termination of the preceding benefit year. His application was disallowed by the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee, and the Board of Review on the ground that he had failed to comply with the active registration requirement set forth in Section 4(w) (2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. (1937 ) 2897, 43 P.S. 751. et seq. This appeal followed.

The record discloses that, on October 24,1960, claimant exhausted his entitlement for the first benefit year by filing a claim for his final compensable week. On that date, according to his own signed statement, claim: ant was notified of the requirement of Section 4(w) (2) *138that he must maintain an active registration for work by reporting to the local office at intervals of not more than sixty days, and was given a form UC-483. See *Lodge Unemployment Compensation Case,*194 Pa. Superior Ct. 626, 169 A. 2d 305. Claimant did not report thereafter until January 3, 1961, which was beyond the sixty-day period.

It is contended on this appeal (1) that claimant “cannot read and speaks little English, and there is no evidence that the requirements of Section 4(w) (2) of the Act were adequately explained or properly communicated to him”; and (2) that claimant was misled by an employe of the Bureau who told him to return “after holiday”. These contentions were controverted, not only by claimant’s admission, but also by the testimony of the claims interviewer. The compensation authorities resolved the factual issues adversely to claimant. Cf. *Kuhnert Unemployment Compensation Case,*195 Pa. Superior Ct. 253, 171 A. 2d 537; *Doble Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 367, 175 A. 2d 345. Findings of fact, supported by the evidence, are conclusive upon appeal: *Rosemas Unemployment Compensation Case,*195 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, 171 A. 2d 534. The requirement of the statute is mandatory: *Peluso Unemployment Compensation Case,*196 Pa. Superior Ct. 526, 175 A. 2d 9232.

Decision affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7664]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Informational Meeting on Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options

AGENCY: Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies, Office of Nuclear Energy, 
Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies will be hosting a one-
day informational meeting at the Argonne National Laboratory in Lemont, 
Illinois. At this meeting, input is being sought from participants 
knowledgeable in nuclear fuel cycles, including those from the public, 
universities, industry and national laboratories.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2012 from 8:30 
a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue, Lemont, IL 
60439. Any individual who wishes to attend the meeting must pre-
register before April 16, 2012 at http://www.inl.gov/conferences/nfco/. 
Foreign Nationals must pre-register before April 5, 2012 and complete 
the ANL Visit Request form per instructions on the Web site.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Melissa Walton, Meeting 
Coordinator, Argonne National Laboratory, Building 208, 9700 S. Cass 
Avenue, Lemont, IL 60439, phone number: 630-252-4860, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#335e44525f475c5d73525d5f1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f8e2f4f9e1fafbd5f4fbf9bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public, however 
space is limited and pre-registration is required (see ADDRESSES 
above). An agenda for the meeting is available at http://www.inl.gov/conferences/nfco/. This meeting is part of the activities leading to a 
comprehensive evaluation and screening of nuclear fuel cycle options in 
2013. At this meeting, input is being sought from participants 
knowledgeable in nuclear fuel cycles, particularly including those from 
the public, universities, industry and national laboratories, to ensure 
that the set of fuel cycle options developed for the evaluation and 
screening provides a comprehensive representation of potential fuel 
cycle performance with respect to the evaluation criteria. The purpose 
of this meeting is NOT to seek input on the evaluation criteria or the 
pros and cons of any particular fuel cycle option. Opportunity for 
providing input on the evaluation criteria will occur in a future 
meeting later this year.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 26, 2012.
Robert Price,
Director, Office of Systems Engineering & Integration.
[FR Doc. 2012-7664 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned officers of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the Company),
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify that to the best of their knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-Q of the Company (the Report) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: November 15, 2004



/s/ Stephen E. CarleyStephen E. CarleyPresident/s/ Joseph SteinJoseph SteinVice President and Treasurer
A01A2152.

#### GRANT v. FAIRCLOTH et al.

(556 SE2d 928)

Eldridge, Judge.

Gordon Grant brought a tort action against Timothy Faircloth, Jr. for negligently running into him with a golf cart on September 29, 1997, while acting within the scope of his employment with Georgia Southern University; the Board of Regents; and John Does 1-5. The defendants, after service, answered and moved for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in this action under the Georgia Tort Claims Act, OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (3). The trial court granted the motion, and we affirm.

Plaintiff sued Faircloth and other unknown individuals who were acting in the scope of their employment for the State when the alleged unintentional tort occurred. Sovereign immunity of the State is waived only in strict compliance with the Act. *Kim v. Dept. of Transp.,*235 Ga. App. 480, 481-482 (2) (510 SE2d 50) (1998); *McGee v. State of Ga.,*227 Ga. App. 107, 108-109 (1) (487 SE2d 671) (1997); *Howard v. State of Ga.,*226 Ga. App. 543, 544-545 (1) (487 SE2d 112) (1997). The Act expressly prohibits suits against State employees absent a showing of malice. OCGA § 50-21-25 (a); *Merrow v. Hawkins,*266 Ga. 390, 392 (2) (467 SE2d 336) (1996). Under the Act, Fair-cloth and any other employees are immune from tort liability. Ga. Const, of 1983, Art. I, Sec. Ií, Par. IX (d); OCGA § 50-21-25 (a); *Riddle v. Ashe,*269 Ga. 65, 66 (1) (495 SE2d 287) (1998).

While the State employee or agent cannot be sued, the State, its agencies, and authorities can be liable under a limited waiver of sovereign immunity when the conditions precedent to waiver under the Act have been satisfied. See OCGA §§ 50-21-23; 50-21-24; 50-21-26; *Riddle v. Ashe,*supra at 67.

However, in this case, plaintiff failed to give the ante litem notice to the Risk Management Division of the Department of Administrative Services with a copy sent to the Board of Regents within 12 months of the occurrence as mandated by OCGA § 50-21-26 (a), which bars this action unless the plaintiff is a minor. *Howard v. State of Ga.,*supra at 545-546 (2); *Howard v. Miller,*222 Ga. App. 868, 871 (1) (476 SE2d 636) (1996). Substantial compliance with the ante litem notice requirement is inadequate under the Act. *McGee v. State of Ga.,*supra at 108-109 (1); *Howard v. State of Ga.,*supra at 544-545 (1). The complaint did not have attached to it a copy of such ante litem notice showing compliance as required by OCGA § 50-21-*79626 (a) (4). The Act prevents the trial court from acquiring subject matter jurisdiction in cases coming within the ambit of the Act where there has been no ante litem notice. OCGA § 50-21-26 (a) (3); *Kim v. Dept. of Transp.,*supra at 482 (2); *Howard v. State of Ga.,*supra at 544-545.

Decided December 6, 2001.

*Steven E. Scheer,*for appellant.

*Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Kathleen M. Pacious, Deputy Attorney General, Loretta L. Pinkston, Senior Assistant Attorney General, David B. Fife, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Andrews, P. J., and Miller, J, concur.*
All PM test data from 2003 survey, ICR, Florida DEP, and PCA - Duplicates removed or multiple tests averagedTest No. Data Source Company Location Kiln ID Raw MillOn/Off TestStart Date Wtd avg emissions (lb/tonclinker) Notes1 PCA comments on NSPS Mitsubishi Lucerne V 1 on/off Apr02&Mar98 0.01 3 separate tests averaged2 2003 Survey Lafarge Sugar Creek, MO Kiln Off 0.01 PCA result was incomplete; used complete test results instead3 PCA comments on NSPS cemex xenia 1 on/off mar02 0.024 PCA & ICR lafarge harleyville kiln on/off oct06&Jun02 0.04 2 separate tests combined & 1 duplicate dropped5 Florida DEP Florida Rock Industries Newberry, FL Kiln/raw mill Line 1 N.R. 7/20/2004 0.056 PCA comments on NSPS holcim theodore 1 on/off Jul02 0.067 NESHAP ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 2 (Humbolt) - TDF N.A. 7/13/2005 0.068 PCA comments on NSPS cemex louisville 1 on feb01 0.079 Florida DEP CEMEx Brooksville, FL Kiln #2 N.R. 3/10/2003 0.0910 Florida DEP CEMEX Brooksville, FL Kiln #1 N.R. 12/13/2006 0.0911 PCA comments on NSPS holcim florence 1 on/off Oct02&Jun03 0.09 2 separate tests combined12 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #1 (April 2002) N.R. 0.1013 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Glen Falls, NY Kiln On 2/22/2006 0.1114 ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 1(ACL) Dec-90 0.1215 2003 Survey Illinois LaSalle, IL Kiln On 0.1416 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 5 on/off jun04&Aug02 0.14 2 separate tests combined17 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 2 NA dec02 0.1518 ICR Lone Star Ogelsby, IL Kiln Nov-99 0.1619 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Mitchell, IN Kiln 1(after modification) N.A. 12/16/2003 0.2320 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 1 NA dec02 0.2521 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 4 NA Aug02 0.2822 PCA & ICR lafarge joppa 2 NA nov04&9/25/2002 0.41 2 separate tests combined23 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #2, Mill On 4/1/2002 0.4224 PCA comments on NSPS lehigh mitchell 3 NA dec02 0.4525 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 3 Feb-97 1.0526 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 1 Feb-97 1.2927 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 2 Feb-97 1.2928 ICR Ash Grove Seattle, WA Kiln Jul-92 1.44
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 08,2007
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe   |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F.  Wolfe      |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |   |

 

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-135092) and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-42354, 33-63510, 33-79756, 33-79664, 333-48357, 333-68815,333-81821, 333-94405, 333-126010, 333-138544) of Allied Waste Industries, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 20, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement scheduleand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and of our report datedFebruary 20, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of Browning-Ferris Industries, LLC, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Wealso consent to the reference to us under the heading “Selected Financial Data” in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00131-CR

Jason J. Ross

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant Coun ty (1444581R)

August 26, 2016

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By __/s/ Lee Ann Daup hinot_____________

Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Carl SCOTT.

No. 88-KK-0241.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Scott, Carl; applying for supervisory and/or remedial wiits; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 4-87-22; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW87 1689.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant and reverse summarily.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.