alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 287

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding U.S. policy toward Libya.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 12, 2000

Mr. HELMS (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding U.S. policy

toward Libya.

Whereas 270 people, including 189 Americans, were killed in

the terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over

Lockerbie, Scotland on December 21, 1988;

Whereas this bombing was one of the worst terrorist atrocities in American history;

Whereas 2 Libyan suspects in the attack are scheduled to go

on trial in The Netherlands on May 3, 2000;

Whereas the United Nations Security Council has required

Libya to cooperate throughout the trial, pay compensation to the families if the suspects are found guilty, and

end support for international terrorism before multilateral sanctions can be permanently lifted;
2

•SRES 287 IS

Whereas Libya is accused in the 1986 La Belle discotheque

bombing in Germany which resulted in the death of 2

United States servicemen;

Whereas in March 1999, 6 Libyan intelligence agents including Muammar Qadhafi’s brother-in-law, were convicted in

absentia by French courts for the bombing of UTA

Flight 772 that resulted in the death of 171 people, including 7 Americans;

Whereas restrictions on United States citizens’ travel to

Libya, known informally as a travel ban, have been in effect since December 11, 1981, as a result of ‘‘threats of

hostile acts against Americans’’ according to the Department of State;

Whereas on March 22, 4 United States State Department officials departed for Libya as part of a review of the travel

ban; and

Whereas Libyan officials have interpreted the review as a

positive signal from the United States, and according to

a senior Libyan official ‘‘the international community was

convinced that Libya’s foreign policy position was not

wrong and there is a noticeable improvement in Libya’s

relations with the world’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) Libya’s refusal to accept responsibility for

3 its role in terrorist attacks against United States

4 citizens suggests that the imminent danger to the

5 physical safety of United States travelers continues;

6 (2) the Administration should consult fully with

7 Congress in considering policy toward Libya, includ-
3

•SRES 287 IS

1 ing disclosure of any assurances received by the Qa2 dhafi regime relative to the judicial proceedings in

3 The Hague; and

4 (3) the travel ban and all other United States

5 restrictions on Libya should not be eased until all

6 cases of American victims of Libyan terrorism have

7 been resolved and the Government of Libya has co8 operated fully in bringing the perpetrators to justice.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 27032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10887]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty-Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
twenty-fifth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport 
Security Access Control Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 3, 2014 from 10:00 a.m.-12:00 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 224. The agenda will 
include the following:

June 3, 2014

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Review/Approve Summary--Twenty-Fourth Meeting.
 Updates from the TSA
 Review and Discussion of PMC Decisions on DO-230D--Standard 
for Airport Security Access Control Systems
 Review of DO-230D Sections--Determine Required Update Sequence
 Terms of Reference--Discuss Possible Revisions
 Discussion--Obtain New Committee Members
 Time and Place of Next Meeting
 Any Other Business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Group, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-10887 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Special Emphasis Panel, Review of the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders.                    

*Date:*                         March 28-29, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         4 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         Legacy Hotel and Meeting Center, 1775 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Beata Buzas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes Of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 2081, Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 443-0800,                         *bbuzas@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards., National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 9, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-733 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 389

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President for the courteous,

dignified, and impartial manner in which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 15 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. REID)

submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Tendering the thanks of the Senate to the Vice President

for the courteous, dignified, and impartial manner in

which he has presided over the deliberations of the Senate.

1 Resolved, That the thanks of the Senate are hereby

2 tendered to the Honorable Al Gore, Vice President of the

3 United States and President of the Senate, for the cour4 teous, dignified, and impartial manner in which he has

5 presided over its deliberations during the second session

6 of the One Hundred Sixth Congress.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1








STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented.

















/s/ Thomas W. Winfree                                               Date  August 20, 2010


Thomas W. Winfree


Chief Executive Officer

















/s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.                                                      Date  August 20, 2010


C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Baldwin Green, Defendant.

Court of General Sessions of County of New York,

April 7, 1959.

*Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney (Peter J. O’Connor*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Baldwin Green,*defendant in person.

Thomas Dickens, J.

Defendant by motion applies as a pauper for a copy of the stenographic minutes of his trial held in 1938. In that year, he was convicted' on the charge of robbery in the first degree.

In support of this motion, written in longhand, defendant refers to the case of *Griffin*v. *Illinois*(351 U. S. 12). *747A material quotation from *People*v. *Brown*(3 A D 2d 696) however, should suffice as an answer to defendant’s application: “ Neither this court nor the court of original jurisdiction has power to furnish to a defendant, gratis, a transcript of the minutes of trial, after trial, except in cases where the judgment is of death or of life imprisonment following a recommendation of a jury pursuant to section 1045-a of the Penal Law (Code Grim. Pro., §§ 308, 485; cf. *People*v. *Raymondi,*180 MisC. 973).” (See, also, *People*v. *Cadogan,*4 Misc 2d 744.)

Motion denied.

The District Attorney is directed to enter an order in conformance with the decision herein and to forward a certified copy to defendant.
#### Magaro Appeal.

*11Argued November 17, 1961.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Rhodes, P. J., absent).

Before Shughart, P. J.

*C. Russell*Welsh, Jr., with him *Carl R. Mapel,*and *Marh & Mapel,*for appellant.

*12*Richard G. Snelbalcer,*Assistant District Attorney, witli him *Harold S. Irwin, Jr.,*District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

December 14, 1961:

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The order of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Cumberland County is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Dale F. Shughart for the court below, reported at 25 Pa. D. & C. 2d 572.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tyronne JOSEPH.

No. 88-KK-0371.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1988.

In re Joseph, Tyronne; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 322-064; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-0289.

Granted. The district court is instructed to commence the trial in defendant’s case on February 22, 1988 or enlarge the defendant without bail.
EXHIBIT 22.1

                     SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

                               AS OF JUNE 30, 1998
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        Jurisdiction of     Parent                    Percentage
Subsidiary                              Incorporation       Corporation               Ownership
<S>                                     <C>                 <C>                          <C>
Fantastic Foods International Inc.      Nevada              Company                      100%

NuOasis International Inc.              Commonwealth        Company                      100%
                                        of the Bahamas

NuOasis Properties Inc.(1)              Nevada              Company                      100%

NuOasis Las Vegas Inc.(1)               Colorado            Company                      100%

NuOasis Laughlin Inc.(1)                Colorado            Company                      100%

Casino Management of America Inc.(1)    Utah                Company                      100%

ACI Asset Management Inc.(1)            Nevada              Company                      100%

Cleopatra Palace, Ltd.                  Tunisia             NuOasis International Inc.    70%

Cleopatra's World Inc.                  British Virgin      NuOasis International Inc.    60%
                                        Islands
</TABLE>
(1)  Have not commenced business.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700301

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JEAN P. PANATTA

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel M. J. Kent, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station, 

Yuma AZ.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Jennifer 

S. Parker, USMC.

For Appellant: Captain Scott F. Hallauer, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 13 February 2018

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and WOODARD, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
#### In the Matter of State-Wide Insurance Company, Appellant, v Nellie Valdes, Respondent.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Wager, J.), dated September 28, 1989, which denied its application, *inter alia,*for a hearing to determine whether the offending vehicle was insured at the time of the accident.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

While the petitioner State-Wide Insurance Company (hereinafter State-Wide) submitted a registration record printout from the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles which indicated that the offending vehicle was insured under the assigned risk plan, the claimant adduced ample evidence to rebut that document *(see generally, Matter of Nationwide Ins. Co. [Dye],*170 AD2d 683). Indeed, the police accident report prepared at the scene does not indicate that any evidence of insurance coverage for the vehicle was exhibited at the scene. Moreover, the claimant submitted two documents from the New York Automobile Insurance Plan which indicate that, despite thorough searches, no record of an assignment of the offending vehicle to an insurer in the assigned risk plan could be located. It is well settled that " '[w]here sufficient evidence is introduced to rebut the prima facie case, the claimant’s insurer must present additional proof of insurance in order to prevail’ ” *(Matter of State Wide Ins. Co. v. Libecci,*104 AD2d 893, 895, quoting *Matter of State*
      *625
      *Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Yeglinski,*79 AD2d 1029). Inasmuch as State-Wide failed to come forward with any additional evidence to challenge the claimant’s documentary proof demonstrating that the offending vehicle was uninsured, we find that the Supreme Court properly rejected State-Wide’s claim that a hearing on its application for a stay was necessary.

We have considered the petitioner’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 21.1**

**Allion Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries**

Allion Healthcare, Inc. a Delaware Corporation 

1660 Walt Whitman Road Suite 105, Melville, NY 11747 

MOMS Pharmacy, Inc., a California Corporation 

19300 S. Hamilton Ave, Suite 170, Gardena, CA 90248 

Medicine Made Easy, a California Corporation 

19300 S. Hamilton Ave, Suite 170, Gardena, CA 90248 

3940 Fourth Ave, Suite 150, San Diego CA 98104 

MOMS Pharmacy, Inc., a New York Corporation 

1660 Walt Whitman Road, Suite 105, Melville, NY 11747 

MOMS Pharmacy, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company; d/b/a MOMS Specialty Care Pharmacy 

4500 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33137 

North American Home Health Supply, Inc. a California Corporation 

16129 CohassetSt., Van Nuys CA 91406 

7590 Fay Ave., suite 403, La Jolla CA 92037 

Specialty Pharmacies, Inc. a Washington Corporation 

191 Golden Gate Ave., San Francisco CA 94102 

1120 Cherry Street, Seattle WA 98104 

45 Castro Street, Suite 124, San Francisco CA 98104 

Oris Health, Inc. a CaliforniaCorporation 

915 Camino Del Mar, Ste. 200, Del Mar CA 92014 

MOMS Pharmacy of Brooklyn, Inc. a New York Corporation 

821 Franklin Avenue, Brooklyn NY 11225
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000010726-OCT-201210:20 AM
EXHIBIT 23.1








The Board of Directors
Apple South, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements
(No.  33-49748,  No. 33-68978,  No. 333-3764,  and No. 333-3736) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-02958) on Form S-3 of Apple South, Inc. of our report dated January 24,
1997,  except as to note 15, as to which the date is February 7, 1997,  relating
to the consolidated  balance sheets of Apple South, Inc. as of December 29, 1996
and December  31, 1995,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of earnings,
shareholders'  equity,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year
period ended  December 29, 1996,  which report  appears in the December 29, 1996
annual report on Form 10-K of Apple South, Inc.

                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
February 18, 1997


<PAGE>
#### NOEL ENTERPRISES, INC., etc., Appellant, v. Richard L. SMITZ, Appellee.

No. 85-916.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 4, 1986.

On Motion for Rehearing May 29, 1986.

James P. Beadle, of Jack B. Spira, P.A., Palm Bay, for appellant.

A.F. Barone, North Palm Beach, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.

*96ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

UPCHURCH, Judge.

In its motion for rehearing, appellant states that it requested oral argument at the time of service of its initial brief. The matter was decided without oral argument and without an order being entered denying oral argument. We note that counsel for appellant simply requested oral argument following the conclusion of the brief. He did *not*comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320 which states: “A request for oral argument *shall*be a separate document_” (emphasis added).

While our failure to grant the request for oral argument may seem arbitrary to counsel, it is not, as an explanation of our procedure demonstrates. The ministerial acts of filing and docketing briefs, motions and other documents are handled by clerical personnel whose interest in the progress of a case is generally limited to seeing that the briefs and motions are properly filed and docketed. While often they do find a request for oral argument contained in a brief and place the case on the oral argument docket, that is probably the exception rather than the rule. As stated in *Haines v. State,*113 So.2d 601 (Fla.2d DCA 1959):

> To require a clerk to search a brief or a bound record to ascertain whether an application for oral argument had been made would impose upon him and his staff an unnecessarily burdensome duty.

113 So.2d at 602. *See also Quince v. State,*91 So.2d 632 (Fla.1956).

In contrast, if a request for oral argument is made by separate document as required by rule 9.320, it is independently docketed, and, except in the very rare instance where oral argument is dispensed with by *order*of the court, the case is placed upon the oral argument calendar. If oral argument is not requested or, as in this situation, improperly requested and therefore overlooked, the case is handled by assignment to a panel of judges for . conference without oral argument.

REHEARING DENIED.

DAUKSCH and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of QC Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don Early, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/ Don EarlyDon EarlyChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer




Page 29