alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES OF COLORADO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Andrew A. GONZALES and Mary E. Gonzales, Defendants, and CF & I Steel Corporation, Garnishee-Appellee.

No. 81CA0557.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Aug. 5, 1982.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 26, 1982.

Certiorari Denied Nov. 1, 1982.

Joseph J. Lenihan, Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.

Lee N. Sternal, Pueblo, for garnishee-ap-pellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiff, Avco Financial Services, obtained a judgment against Andrew and Mary Gonzales and sought to enforce it by garnishing CF & I Steel Corporation. Plaintiff subsequently filed a “motion to hold garnishee in contempt,” which was dismissed for failure to comply with the requirements of C.R.C.P. 107. CF & I thereupon filed a motion for attorney’s fees and costs. It is the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees which is the subject of this appeal. We reverse.

CF & I here argues, and the trial court ruled, that the provisions of C.R.C.P. 107(d) justify the award of attorney’s fees. We disagree.

C.R.C.P. 107(c) provides for the issuance of a citation to a person charged with contempt of court, and for securing the presence of that person in court for a hearing. C.R.C.P. 107(d) delineates the court’s authority to assess punishment for contempt when the facts warrant. Among other things, that subsection provides:

> “A fine may be imposed not exceeding the damages suffered by the contempt, plus costs of the contempt proceeding, plus reasonable attorney’s fees in connection with the contempt proceeding, payable to the person damaged thereby.”

The language of the rule does not extend beyond authorization for imposition of attorney’s fees against a contemnor for the benefit of the person damaged by the contempt. It does not authorize imposition of attorney’s fees to recompense the con-temnor, no matter how inappropriate may be the contempt proceeding initiated by the person claiming damage. Since a trial court may not award attorney’s fees in the absence of statute, rule, or contract, *Agee v. Trustees of Pension Board,*33 Colo.App. 268, 518 P.2d 301 (1974), CF & I, the alleged contemnor, was not entitled to an award of attorney’s fees.

The judgment is reversed.

SMITH and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
#### The State, ex rel. Hayes, *v.*Heiser et al., Trustees of Firemen’s Pension Fund of Columbus, Ohio.

(No. 31094

Decided March 10, 1948.)

*190
      *Mr. Leonard P. Henderson,*for relator.

*Mr. Richard W. Gordon,*city attorney, *Mr. Baxter Evans*and *Mr. Robert E. Leach,*for respondents.

By the Court.

Relator’s brief stages the sole question presented is: Did the right to receive a pension become vested in relator by reason of tbe judgment and orders of tbis court on March 24, 1937? If such right did vest, relator then contends tbe pension board bad no authority to do other than was ordered by this court, namely, pay relator a pension of $100 peí* montb.

The demurrer admits all the well pleaded allegations of the answer and searches the entire record. *State, ex rel. Deal,*v. *Industrial Commission,*120 Ohio St.; 269, 166 N. E., 198; 31 Ohio Jurisprudence, 781, Section 202.

The relator by bis demurrer admits the allegation of the answer that tbis court in cause No. 25985 issued a writ of mandamus directing tbe payment of $50. The sole question determined in tbe former mandamus proceeding was tbe right of relator to receive that sum as a pension for 14 days. See *State, ex rel.*
      *191
      *Hayes,*v. *Pfeiffer et al., Board of Trustees of Firemen’s Pension Fund of City of*Columbus, 132 Ohio St., 335, 7 N. E. (2d), 409. No other right to a pension vested in relator by the writ issued in that case.

The demurrer in the instant case admits that subsequent payments were made as alleged in the answer. The relator’s pension was granted when such a pension was a gratuity rather than a vested or contractual right. *(Mell et al., Trustees,*v. *State, ex ret. Fritz,*130 Ohio St., 306, 199 N. E., 72.) The board of trustees then had discretionary power to modify pension awards made prior to May 26, 1937, the effective date of Section 4612-1, General Code (117 Ohio Laws, 29), which date was after March 24, 1937, when this court ordered a writ issued in the former mandamus proceeding.

The demurrer is sustained as to the petition and overruled as to the answer, and a writ of mandamus is denied.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2006 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.
| **Date: November 13, 2006** | ** **                     |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                        | /s/ John Fitzpatrick           |   |
|                        | Name: John Fitzpatrick         |
|                        | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATK)RNEY**  **OENRRAL OF**  **TRXAS AUSTIN**  **-C.WAMN**
**-- \**  **tP**

reQu*ating our opiaion 05 ember 10, 1940,



### w roeeirea four

**August** so, 1910, 0. xouur, state th Adminlstrlrtion, aa

General shall be scoured wtth referenoe to the nOan-profit **making,** tax-exempt chareotsr of the iIl6titUtiOA.' "Tha appllOstion .Oi the Hookaday Ju510r Collsge will be held In OUT illsa pending a **ruling by**  the **Attorney Csneral~s**  Department on the ellgiblllty of the lnstltutlon (ra 

### .,. 523**regards** ltm non-profitmaking and tu-exempt

**abraotar.** Tho r.

18 l ttaohod a .opr of tho ahartor 

### ?or t&la 

### inrtitutlon.* In 

### aaswor to Junior Collym, laao bo Iour Query as to whather tho Hookaday 56 a **part of**  the 

### H0ekad8y sohool, 1s a non-protlt Institution, w 8.~1 only 8ay thnt it is lnoor

### porated a8 wash. Tho 

### oorpomtr purpoao or said inrtltution 

### I8 l p ra a*rd

ls rollon~ 'kid aarporatlon 18 aon-pawit and 

### l loomuayna~~In Its 

### n a t u ri, l stm)lIshodfor 

### l duoatloaal and lltormrrpurpose0 nnd has no oapltal 8to.k." I. 4at.mlnl~ whothor 

### or aot prop.rty uawl 

### ror sohoal **purpomos** Im ax-t from taxmtlon,WI rrfer to Artlola Tl50, Vunon~a Annotated CIrIl Statutes, whloh reads, In put, as foUow8:

%I. iollodng **proparty** shall **be** 

### l xmmpt 

### from tuatlon, to-tit1 ill pub110 oollogos

. and all muoh buIldlogoused 

### l xolurlte~~ &ii ouad by prosoar or seroa3atlono or porroarwsohool purposas; . . . .. (Bnphamls ourm). Ii tha builaiaaa ooarprlslng thm Hookaday Junior Colle60 a re

ua a d l xoluslr~l~a56 ouod by persons 

### or assoolatU;;i,;; 

### porsonr r lonooi porpo~ey are axapt in#

uhathw"~his Is true pro8oBt8 a faot pwstiea whSoh wa’are unable to am-or.

you sro 

### hutbar aaria that la opl5loa NO. O-lb41 this 

### departmeat ruled that the 

### l xomptlon sot out in Arti 7160, 

### supra, 4008 not apply to por8onalproprrtr.

'(I* lnolomr a 

### oopr OS that oplnlonubloh monbin~ a 0ltatSoa of pertinent 

### l utborltl.8.

**Your8** vary truly

A8818taat
#### STATE In the Interest of Pablo Martin QUAN v. Raul and Grace QUAN, Parents of Pablo Martin Quan.

No. 87-CK-1121.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Pablo Martin Quan, applying for rehearing of writ granted with order on June 12, 1987, 508 So.2d 576, from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CA-6491; Juvenile Court, No. 201-369, Parish of Orleans, Div. A.

Denied.

DENNIS, WATSON and COLE, JJ., would grant the rehearing.
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1002 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 145 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Rocznik 6330 kwietnia 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1002

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 145

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Rocznik 6330 kwietnia 2020

---

| Spis treści | Strona |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Rada |
| 2020/C 145/01 | Decyzja Rady z dnia 28 kwietnia 2020 r. w sprawie mianowania członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego | 1 |

Spis treści

Strona

Rada

2020/C 145/01

Decyzja Rady z dnia 28 kwietnia 2020 r. w sprawie mianowania członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego

1

---

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

Rada

| 30.4.2020 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 145/1

---

DECYZJA RADY

z dnia 28 kwietnia 2020 r.

w sprawie mianowania członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego

(2020/C 145/01)

RADA UNII EUROPEJSKIEJ,

uwzględniając Traktat ustanawiający Europejską Wspólnotę Energii Atomowej, w szczególności jego art. 134 ust. 2,

po konsultacji z Komisją Europejską,

a także mając na uwadze, co następuje:

| (1) | Decyzją z dnia 6 listopada 2018 r. (1) Rada mianowała członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego (zwanego dalej „komitetem”) na okres od dnia 6 listopada 2018 r. do dnia 6 listopada 2023 r. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decyzją z dnia 6 listopada 2018 r. (1) Rada mianowała członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego (zwanego dalej „komitetem”) na okres od dnia 6 listopada 2018 r. do dnia 6 listopada 2023 r.

| (2) | W następstwie zgonu Eugenijusa UŠPURASA stanowisko członka komitetu pozostaje nieobsadzone. Należy zatem mianować nowego członka na pozostały okres kadencji Eugenijusa UŠPURASA. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

W następstwie zgonu Eugenijusa UŠPURASA stanowisko członka komitetu pozostaje nieobsadzone. Należy zatem mianować nowego członka na pozostały okres kadencji Eugenijusa UŠPURASA.

| (3) | W następstwie rezygnacji Grzegorza WROCHNY stanowisko członka komitetu pozostaje nieobsadzone. Należy zatem mianować nowego członka na pozostały okres kadencji Grzegorza WROCHNY, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

W następstwie rezygnacji Grzegorza WROCHNY stanowisko członka komitetu pozostaje nieobsadzone. Należy zatem mianować nowego członka na pozostały okres kadencji Grzegorza WROCHNY,

PRZYJMUJE NINIEJSZĄ DECYZJĘ:

Artykuł 1

Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS i Józef SOBOLEWSKI zostają niniejszym mianowani członkami Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego na okres do dnia 6 listopada 2023 r.

Artykuł 2

Niniejsza decyzja wchodzi w życie z dniem jej przyjęcia.

Sporządzono w Brukseli dnia 28 kwietnia 2020 r.

W imieniu Rady

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

Przewodniczący

---

(1)  Decyzja Rady z dnia 6 listopada 2018 r. w sprawie mianowania członków Komitetu Naukowo-Technicznego (Dz.U. C 403 z 9.11.2018, s. 2).

1

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Petro,
Inc. (the Company), that to his knowledge:



(1)
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This written statement is being furnished to the SEC as an exhibit to the Report. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ J. A. Cardwell, Sr.              
|                      |  | J. A. Cardwell, Sr.                  
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                      | 
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ James A. Cardwell, Jr.           
|                      |  | James A. Cardwell, Jr.               
|                      |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1868

___________________________ Richard Otto Hansen lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Jana M. Chase, in her individual capacity, and in her official capacity as a Community Services Coordinator of Community Action Partnership of Mid-Nebraska

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: December 31, 2020 Filed: January 6, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Richard Otto Hansen appeals the district court’s 1 pre-service dismissal of his

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court. After careful review of the record and Hansen’s arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino , 526 F.3d 402, 404 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny as moot Hansen’s motion for appointment of counsel.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2-
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Raquel SALAZAR Salazar, aka Don Alberto, aka Don Roberto, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus Martin Reyes-Mojardin, Defendant—Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Miguel Gaytan-Perez, Defendant— Appellant.

Nos. 02-10145, 02-10185, 02-10391.

D.C. No. CR-00-00184-HG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 5, 2003.

Decided May 14, 2003.

Before GOODWIN, RYMER, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Defendants Raquel Salazar-Salazar, Jesus Mojardin, and Miguel Gaytan-Perez raise seven distinct issues on appeal. Although we consolidated the appeals for the purpose of oral argument, we now consider each appeal separately.

I. Raquel Salazar-Salazar

Salazar-Salazar assigns error to the admission of his 1985 conviction for conspiracy. The court did not abuse its discretion when it admitted a ‘sanitized’ version of the conviction under Federal Rule of Evidence 609(b). Nor did the district court abuse its discretion by admitting an out-of-court statement made by Mojardin to a government agent. Salazar’s counsel “opened the door” to the entire statement by referencing particular portions of it during cross examination. Finally, Salazar-Salazar assigns error to the denial of his motion to transfer venue. Again, the court did not abuse its discretion. We affirm the judgment.

II. Jesus Mojardin

During Mojardin’s sentencing hearing, the district court ruled that he was ineligible for a “safety valve” reduction pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. Under any quantum of evidence standard, the evidence proved that Mojardin carried a firearm in connection with the underlying offense. Mojardin also assigns error to the district court’s ruling that he was ineligible for a sentence reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because his role in the underlying conspiracy was not “minor.” The evidence that he was an enforcer-collector for the conspiracy justified the trial court’s ruling. We affirm Mojardin’s conviction and sentence as calculated by the district court.

III. Miguel Gaytan-Perez

Gaytan-Perez assigns error to the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because the court sufficiently established that Gaytan-Perez *98knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea, it did not abuse its discretion by denying his subsequent withdrawal motion. We decline to consider Gaytan-Perez’s argument that the Government breached its plea agreement by failing to seek cooperation from him. Defense counsel failed to raise this issue during the sentencing hearing, and therefore has waived it. We affirm Gaytan-Perez’s conviction and sentence as calculated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brenton W. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.











Date:
March 17, 2011

By:
/s/ Brenton W. HatchBrenton W. HatchChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-92824, 333-65361, 333-65359 and 333-65363) each on Form S-8 of Franklin
Financial Corporation of our report dated June 22, 1999, relating to the
financial statements and related schedules for the Franklin Financial Employees
Retirement Savings Plan as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998 and
1997, which report appears in Exhibit 99 of this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Franklin Financial Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1998.


/s/ Heathcott & Mullaly, P.C.
Brentwood, Tennessee

June 25, 1999
EXHIBIT 21.1
 
 JURISDICTION OF
    
    PERCENT OFPARENT
    
    SUBSIDIARIES
    
    ORGANIZATION
    
    OWNERSHIPHawk Corporation
    
    Wellman Products Group, Inc.
    
    Ohio
    
    100%Hawk Mauritius, Ltd.
    
    Hawk Composites (Suzhou) Company Limited (2)
    
    China
    
    100%Hawk International Trading (Shanghai) Company, Ltd.
    
    China
    
    100%Wellman Products India Private Limited (1)
    
    India
    
    99%Hawk Motors, Inc.
    
    Hawk Motors de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.)
    
    Mexico
    
    5%S. K. Wellman
    
    S. K. Wellman Corp. (1)
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Holdings, Inc.
    
    S. K. Wellman S.p.A.(1)
    
    Italy
    
    95%S. K. Wellman Corp.
    
    The S. K. Wellman Company of Canada Limited (1)
    
    Canada
    
    100%S. K. Wellman S.p.A. (1)
    
    Italy
    
    5%Wellman India Holdings, LLC
    
    Wellman Products India Private Limited (1)
    
    India
    
    1%Wellman Products
    
    Friction Products Co.(1)
    
    Ohio
    
    100%Group, Inc.
    
    Logan Metal Stampings, Inc.(1)
    
    Ohio
    
    100%S.K. Wellman Holdings, Inc.(1)
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Wellman Products LLC (1)
    
    Ohio
    
    100%Hawk Motors, Inc.
    
    Delaware
    
    100%Hawk Motors de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V.
    
    Mexico
    
    95%Hawk Mauritius, Ltd.
    
    Mauritius
    
    100%Wellman India Holdings, LLC
    
    Ohio
    
    100%
 (1)
    
    These subsidiaries also conduct business under the trade name The Wellman Products
Group.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of QC Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don Early, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 8, 2009



/s/ Don EarlyDon EarlyChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350**We hereby certify that this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to the best of ourknowledge, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allied Waste Industries,Inc.       ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.       By: /s/ JOHN J. ZILLMER         John J. Zillmer    Chairman of the Board of Directors and    Chief Executive Officer       ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.       By: /s/ PETER S. HATHAWAY         Peter S. Hathaway    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date:March 3, 2006    
173
H. Con. Res. 14 Agreed to February 27, 2001

One Hundred Seventh Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, two thousand and one

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used

on April 19, 2001, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration

of the days of remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical

preparations for the ceremony shall be carried out in accordance

with such conditions as the Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.