alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           13967
<SECURITIES>                                     10249
<RECEIVABLES>                                    14826
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      17039
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 58835
<PP&E>                                           22276
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   82086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         81495
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     82086
<SALES>                                          31563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 31563
<CGS>                                            20997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    20997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1409)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15877)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5398)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10479)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10479)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.34)



</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Herbert VESSELL.

No. 86-K-2229.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Vessell, Herbert; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 86-KA-254; Par*421ish of East Baton Rouge, 191⁄8 Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 6-83-686.

Prior report: La.App., 496 So.2d 576.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 357 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 357

Welcoming Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Prime Minister of India, 
   upon his first official visit to the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2000

 Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. Wellstone) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Welcoming Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, Prime Minister of India, 
   upon his first official visit to the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas the United States and India are two of the world's largest democracies 
        that together represent one-fifth of the world's population and more 
        than one-fourth of the world's economy;
Whereas the United States and India share common ideals and a vision for the 
        21st century, where freedom and democracy are the strongest foundations 
        for peace and prosperity;
Whereas the growing partnership between the United States and India is 
        reinforced by the ties of scholarship and commerce and, increasingly, of 
        kinship among our people;
Whereas the million-strong Indian-American community in the United States has 
        enriched and enlivened the societies of both the United States and 
        India, and this community provides a strong bond between India and the 
        United States and is playing an important role in deepening and 
        strengthening cooperation between India and the United States; and
Whereas the visit to the United States of the Prime Minister of India, Atal 
        Bihari Vajpayee, is a significant step in the broadening and 
        strengthening of relations between the United States and India: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate hereby--
            (1) welcomes the Prime Minister of India, Atal Bihari 
        Vajpayee, upon his first official visit to the United States;
            (2) pledges its commitment to the expansion of ties between 
        the United States and India, to the mutual benefit of both 
        countries; and
            (3) recognizes that the visit of the Prime Minister of 
        India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, to the United States is a 
        significant step towards broadening and deepening the 
        friendship and cooperation between the United States and India.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to the President with the request that he further transmit 
such copy to the Prime Minister of India, Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 16 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 16

  Proposing a constitutional amendment to establish limited judicial 
                            terms of office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. Shelby, and Mr. Helms) 
  introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing a constitutional amendment to establish limited judicial 
                            terms of office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

                              ``Article--

    ``The Chief Justice and the judges of both the Supreme Court and 
the inferior courts shall hold their offices for the term of ten years. 
They shall be eligible for nomination and, by and with the advice and 
consent of the Senate, for appointment by the President to additional 
terms. This article shall not apply to any Chief Justice or judge who 
was appointed before it becomes operative.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Charles WEBB v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1559.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 4, 1987.

In re Webb, Charles; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 42-218.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to trial court for consideration.
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "Report")
of Diamond Entertainment Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred U. Odaka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ Fred U. Odaka
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Fred U. Odaka
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                                Chief Accounting Officer)
                                                Date: July 13, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of HyperSpace Communications, Inc. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
|               |                     |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
|               |                     |
|               | /s/ Mark  Endry          |   |
| November 12,  2004 | Mark Endry               |
|               | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 130 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 130

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 10, 2001

   Received and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Authorizing printing of the book entitled ``Asian and Pacific Islander 
                        Americans in Congress''.

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),

SECTION 1. ASIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER AMERICANS IN CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The book entitled ``Asian and Pacific Islander 
Americans in Congress'', prepared by the Library of Congress under the 
direction of the Joint Committee on Printing, shall be printed as a 
House document.
    (b) Specifications.--The House document described in subsection (a) 
shall include illustrations and shall be in the style, form, manner, 
and binding as directed by the Joint Committee on Printing.

SEC. 2. NUMBER OF COPIES.

    In addition to the usual number of copies, there shall be printed 
the lesser of--
            (1) 30,700 copies of the document described in subsection 
        (a) of section 1, of which--
                    (A) 25,000 shall be for the use of the Committee on 
                House Administration of the House of Representatives; 
                and
                    (B) 5,700 shall be for the use of the Committee on 
                Rules and Administration of the Senate; or
            (2) such number of copies of the document described in 
        subsection (a) of section 1 as does not exceed a total 
        production and printing cost of $220,000, which copies shall be 
        for the use of the Committee on House Administration of the 
        House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
        Administration of the Senate in the same proportions as 
        described in paragraph (1).

            Passed the House of Representatives October 9, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 95

Designating August 16, 1999, as ‘‘National Airborne Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 4, 1999

Mr. THURMOND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating August 16, 1999, as ‘‘National Airborne Day’’.

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was authorized by the

War Department on June 25, 1940, to experiment with

the potential use of airborne troops;

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon was composed of 48 volunteers that began training in July, 1940;

Whereas the Parachute Test Platoon performed the first official Army parachute jump on August 16, 1940;

Whereas the success of the Parachute Test Platoon led to the

formation of a large and successful airborne contingent

serving from World War II until the present;

Whereas the 11th, 13th, 17th, 82nd, and 101st Airborne Divisions and the numerous other regimental and battalionsized airborne units were organized following the success

of the Parachute Test Platoon;
2

•SRES 95 IS

Whereas the 501st Parachute Battalion participated successfully and valiantly in achieving victory in World War II;

Whereas the airborne achievements during World War II provided the basis for continuing the development of a diversified force of parachute and air assault troops;

Whereas paratroopers, glidermen, and air assault troops of

the United States were and are proud members of the

world’s most exclusive and honorable fraternity, have

earned and wear the ‘‘Silver Wings of Courage’’, have

participated in a total of 93 combat jumps, and have distinguished themselves in battle by earning 68 Congressional Medals of Honor, the highest military decoration

of the United States, and hundreds of Distinguished

Service Crosses and Silver Stars;

Whereas these airborne forces have performed in important

military and peacekeeping operations, wherever needed,

in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, Lebanon, Sinai, the

Dominican Republic, Panama, Somalia, Haiti, and Bosnia; and

Whereas the Senate joins together with the airborne community to celebrate August 16, 1999, as ‘‘National Airborne

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates August 16, 1999, as ‘‘National

3 Airborne Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling on Federal, State, and local adminis6 trators and the people of the United States to ob-
3

•SRES 95 IS

1 serve the day with appropriate programs, cere2 monies, and activities.

Æ
```

[Federal Register: September 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 182)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57463]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21se10-52]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
DOE/NSF High Energy Physics Advisory Panel

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Science.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the DOE/NSF High Energy 
Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP). Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Thursday, November 18, 2010; 9 a.m.-6 p.m. and Friday, November 
19, 2010; 8:30 a.m.-2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hotel Palomar, 2121 P Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Kogut, Executive Secretary; High 
Energy Physics Advisory Panel; U.S. Department of Energy; SC-25/
Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone: 301-903-1298.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and guidance on a continuing 
basis to the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation 
on scientific priorities within the field of high energy physics 
research.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Thursday, November 18, 2010

     Discussion of Department of Energy High Energy Physics 
Program.
     Discussion of National Science Foundation Elementary 
Particle Physics Program.
     Reports on and Discussions of Topics of General Interest 
in High Energy Physics.
     Public Comment (10-minute rule).
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact John Kogut, 301-903-1298 or John.Kogut@science.doe.gov. You 
must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 business days 
before the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to include the 
scheduled oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Panel 
will conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available on the U.S. 
Department of Energy's Office of High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Web 
site at: http://www.er.doe.gov/hep/panels/hepap.shtml.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 16, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-23563 Filed 9-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### Terry BURCH & Jerry W. Brandt v. DeSOTO PARISH SCHOOL BOARD, et al.

No. 86-C-2570.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Burch, Terry R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18259-CA; Parish of DeSoto, 11th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 44-333.

Denied.

CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant and remand with instructions to permit amendment to remove the grounds for the objection.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-10435

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Roberto Martinez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-519-13

Before Southwick, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Roberto Martinez pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with the intent 

to distribute and distribution of a controlled substance. He now appeals his 

above-guidelines sentence of 144 months in prison, arguing that the district 

court should not have considered expert testimony at sentencing regarding 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-10435 Document: 00516098600 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
No. 21-10435

2

whether the heroin supplied to A.B. by Martinez was the but-for cause of 

A.B.’s death. The basis for Martinez’s argument is that the expert testimony

allegedly did not comply with Federal Rules of Evidence 702 and 703.

The Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at sentencing. Fed. R. 

Evid. 1101(d)(3). A sentencing court “may consider relevant information 

without regard to its admissibility under the rules of evidence applicable at 

trial, provided that the information has sufficient indicia of reliability to 

support its probable accuracy.” United States v. Gaytan, 74 F.3d 545, 558 

(5th Cir. 1996) (quotation marks and citation omitted). Whether information 

relied on at sentencing contains sufficient indicia of reliability is a factual 

finding reviewed for clear error. See id. at 557–58. A finding is not clearly 

erroneous if “it is plausible in light of the record read as a whole.” United 

States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 245 (5th Cir. 2005) (quotation marks and 

citation omitted). 

To the extent that Martinez’s briefing can be construed as a challenge

to the reliability of the expert witness outside of the rubric of the Federal 

Rules of Evidence, the argument is meritless. The record reflects that the 

expert testified in detail regarding her qualifications, her methodology, and 

the facts she relied on in reaching her conclusion. Further, she explained how 

she ruled out the possibility that other drugs in A.B.’s system could have 

caused her death. The district court’s finding that the expert’s testimony 

contained sufficient indicia of reliability is plausible in light of the record as a 

whole, and the district court thus did not err by considering her testimony at 

sentencing. See Gaytan, 74 F.3d at 557–58.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-10435 Document: 00516098600 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>     5 
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
         
<S>                      <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>           YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996 
<CASH>                             963,000 
<SECURITIES>                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,984,000 
<ALLOWANCES>                      (208,000) 
<INVENTORY>                      1,480,000 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 4,605,000 
<PP&E>                           3,969,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                  (3,239,000) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,521,000 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            5,073,000 
<BONDS>                            600,000 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0 
<PREFERRED>                      5,478,000 
<COMMON>                        25,211,000 
<OTHER-SE>                     (30,241,000) 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,521,000 
<SALES>                         11,022,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                11,310,000 
<CGS>                            6,248,000 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    4,717,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 508,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (163,000) 
<INCOME-TAX>                        24,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (187,000) 
<DISCONTINUED>                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    995,000 
<CHANGES>                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                       808,000 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .02 
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .02 
          

</TABLE>