alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vivid Learning Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Christopher L. Britton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)   The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Sandra I. MullerName:
              Sandra I. MullerTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer
              Date:
                August 13, 2007
**Exhibit      32.2**

**C2      GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.**

**OFFICER’S      CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT      TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18      U.S.C. 1350)**

|   | 1. | The                Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section                13(a)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Corporation. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Stephen A. Weintraub                                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen                  A. Weintraub                                             |
|   | Chief                  Financial Officer and Corporate                  Secretary |

----
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40235 Conference Calendar

RICKY L. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus P.W. PACE, Regional Director of Grievance; WESLEY W. PRATT, Assistant Warden; LYNWOOD B. COOK, Major, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:05-CV-271

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ricky L. Walker, Texas prisoner # 585916, appeals from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Walker complains of the Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), hearing in his case being conducted by the magistrate judge. He also asserts that Assistant Warden Wesley Pratt should not have been allowed to testify at the hearing. The magistrate judge had statutory authority to conduct theNo. 06-40235 -2- hearing, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), and this court recognizes that prison officials may testify at Spears hearings. See Wilson v. Barrientos , 926 F.2d 480, 483 (5th Cir. 1991). Walker’s allegations and his testimony at the Spears hearing do not give rise to an inference that Major Lynwood Cook retaliated against him for filing a grievance against the prison education department. Rather, the allegations suggest that Walker was placed in safekeeping for his own safety. See Johnson v. Rodriguez , 110 F.3d 299, 310 (5th Cir. 1997) (requiring that the conduct alleged to be retaliatory would not have occurred absent a retaliatory motivation). Even if his allegations were true, no relief can be granted on the facts Walker alleged. See Bass v. Parkwood Hosp. , 180 F.3d 234, 240 (5th Cir. 1999). Walker’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). The appeal is dismissed. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2. The district court’s dismissal of Walker’s action and this court’s dismissal of his appeal each count as a strike against Walker for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). If he accumulates three strikes, he may no longer proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
#### Miriam ALONSO, Appellant, v. David LEAHY, Supervisor of Elections, Charles Dusseau, Armando Bucelo, Jr., Beverly Phillips and Rebecca Koch, Appellees.

No. 88-2193.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 10, 1988.

Tew, Jorden, Schulte & Beasley and Jose Garcia-Pedrosa, Jose A. Villalobos, Miami, for appellant.

Alan H. Fein, Fred M. Dellapa, Stuart L. Simon, Miami, Rosa Martin Vega, Coral Gables, Robert A. Ginsburg, County Atty., and Murray A. Greenberg, Asst. County Atty., for appellees.

*1077Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

CORRECTED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the trial court properly applied the applicable provision of the Dade County Home Rule and Charter,1 we affirm the trial court’s holding that Dr. Miriam Alonso is not qualified to participate in the County Commission District 7 election. *See Dade County v. Young Democratic Club of Dade County,*104 So.2d 636 (Fla. 1958).

On the cross-appeal of Charles Dusseau and Beverly Phillips, we reverse the final decree insofar as it requires the Dade County Supervisor of Elections to schedule a new primary election. On this point the trial court’s discretion is limited by article 2, section 201(B) of the Home Rule Amendment and Charter of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida.2 We direct that the Supervisor of Elections conduct a run-off election in accordance with the foregoing provisions.

In reaching these results we explicitly do not address any federal questions.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions.

> A candidate must receive a majority of the votes cast to be elected. If no candidate receives a majority of the votes cast there will be a runoff election at the time of the state second primary election between the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes. Should a tie result, the outcome shall be determined by lot.

1

. Article 1, section 1.04(1), of the Dade County Home Rule and Charter reads as follows:

The Board shall consist of nine members elected as follows:

> 1. From each of the eight districts there shall be elected by the qualified electors of the county at large a County Commissioner who shall be a qualified elector residing within the district at least six months and within the county at least three years before qualifying.

2

. Article 2, section 201(B), reads as follows:
#### William Elvis STUARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. O-83-691.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

May 24, 1984.

*1121ORDER

The appellant, William Elvis Stuard, pleaded guilty in the District Court of Stephens County, Case No. CRF-79-76, to the crime of Embezzlement by Bailee, and was given a three (3) year suspended sentence. The State subsequently filed an Application to Revoke Suspended Sentence, alleging as its sole ground for revocation that the appellant had failed to make restitution payments as ordered. After a hearing on the merits, the trial court ordered that the suspended sentence be revoked. Prom said order, the appellant brings this appeal to this Court.

The uncontroverted evidence presented at the hearing showed that the appellant possessed a seventh grade education, and had received training as a welder. Testimony also disclosed that over the previous three years, the appellant had been unable to obtain any employment other than temporary, minimum wage level jobs, and had not earned more than $2,000 in any one year. The appellant had been receiving assistance from the Human Services Department, did not own a vehicle, and lived in a school bus parked behind his mother’s home in Picher.

In *Bearden v. Georgia,*— U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983), the United States Supreme Court held that an indigent defendant’s probation could not be revoked for failure to pay restitution absent evidence and findings that the defendant was responsible for this failure, and that alternative forms of punishment would be inadequate to meet the State’s interest in punishment and deterrence. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we find that the State failed to meet its burden of proof as defined by *Bearden,*supra.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the order revoking the appellant’s suspended sentence is REVERSED, and this cause is hereby REMANDED to the District Court of Stephens County for further proceedings not inconsistent with the views expressed herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, P.J.

ED PARKS, J.

TOM BRETT, J.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 245

Relative to the death of Dr. Floyd M. Riddick, Parliamentarian Emeritus

of the United States Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. BYRD, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA,

Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BAYH, Mr. BENNETT,

Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BOND, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BREAUX, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. BURNS, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. COCHRAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr.

CONRAD, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr.

ENZI, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. FRIST,

Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. GREGG, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

HOLLINGS, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY,

Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. KYL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr.

LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MOYNIHAN,

Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. REED, Mr. REID,

Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. ROTH, Mr.

SANTORUM, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY,

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Ms. SNOWE, Mr.

SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. THOMPSON, Mr. THURMOND,

Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. VOINOVICH, Mr. WARNER, Mr. WELLSTONE, and

Mr. WYDEN) submitted the following resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of Dr. Floyd M. Riddick,

Parliamentarian Emeritus of the United States Senate.
2

SRES 245 ATS

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick served the Senate with honor and

distinction as its second Parliamentarian from 1965 to

1975;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick created the Daily Digest of the

Congressional Record and was its first editor from 1947

to 1951;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick was Assistant Senate Parliamentarian from 1951 to 1964;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick compiled thousands of Senate

precedents into the official volume whose current edition

bears his name;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick served the Senate for more than

40 years;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick upon his retirement as Senate

Parliamentarian served as a consultant to the Senate

Committee on Rules and Administration;

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick performed his Senate duties in an

impartial and professional manner; and

Whereas Floyd M. Riddick was honored by the Senate with

the title Parliamentarian Emeritus: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death

3 of the Honorable Floyd M. Riddick, Parliamentarian

4 Emeritus of the United States Senate.

5 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu6 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives
3

SRES 245 ATS

1 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the

2 deceased.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. Elmer O'NEAL v. COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND CIRCUIT, and First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-0204.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re O’Neal, Elmer; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 131146; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19797-KH.

Denied. No particularized need has been shown.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the "Company") on Form10-Q for the period ended May 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyn Holtmann,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|     |  |                                       |
|-----|--|---------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Lyn   Holtmann                    |
|     |  |                                       |
|     |  | Lyn Holtmann*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: January 10, 2005
391 A.2d 709

#### LeFebvre, Appellant, v. LeFebvre.

Submitted April 10, 1978.

James B. Ceris, for appellant; Richard E. Davis, for appellee.

Order dismissing complaint in divorce affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, William Scott Marshall, President and a director of Cascade Energy, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cascade Energy, Inc. for the nine month period ended November 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cascade Energy, Inc.

Date: January 23, 2006

/s/ William Scott Marshall                        

William Scott Marshall

President and Director

(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350
Certifications

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, William Marshall, Chief Executive
Officer and Director of Cascade Energy Inc., certify that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB (the Report) for the period ended August 31, 2006, filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof:

|(i)  | fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended, and                          
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the
      Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial and results
      of operations of Cascade Energy Inc.
|    

|By: | /s/ William
      Marshall                     
|--- | -----------------------------------------------
|    | CEOand a
      member of the Board of Directors

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Energy Inc., and
will be retained by Cascade Energy Inc., and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hawk Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald E.
Weinberg, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ RONALD E. WEINBERG
Ronald E. Weinberg
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President


May 14, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained in that statute, and not for any other
purpose.

81
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIS ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 000847322
<NAME> CRIIMI MAE INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          91,640
<SECURITIES>                                 1,574,128
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,293,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,962
<BONDS>                                      1,982,351
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         26
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                     218,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,293,661
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,070
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             151,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (126,529)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (126,529)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.45)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

Schedule II





VULCAN INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES



VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS





|                                                                                          |   | 2004    |  | 2003    |  | 2002   
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------- |  | ------- |  | -------
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |        
|The following reserve is deducted in the balance
sheet from the asset to which it applies |   |         |  |         |  |        
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Reserve for Doubtful Accounts Receivable:                                                 |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Balance at Beginning of Period                                                            | $ | 124,172 |  | 127,435 |  | 91,367 
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Additions:                                                                                |   |         |  |         |  |        
|(1)  Charged to costs and expenses                                                        |   | 5,906   |  | 11,928  |  | 48,000 
|(2)  Charged to Other Accounts                                                            |   | -       |  | -       |  | -      
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Deductions:                                                                               |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Write off of bad debts                                                                    |   | 22,664  |  | 15,191  |  | 11,932 
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |        
|Balance at End of Period                                                                  | $ | 107,414 |  | 124,172 |  | 127,435
|                                                                                          |   |         |  |         |  |
III

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 110

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 26, 2001

Received and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress in support of National

Children’s Memorial Flag Day.

Whereas among the world’s 26 richest nations, the United

States accounted for 73 percent of child homicide victims;

Whereas at least 3 children a day die from physical abuse or

chronic neglect in the United States;

Whereas April has been designated as National Child Abuse

Prevention Month, an annual tradition started by President Jimmy Carter in 1979; and
2

HCON 110 RFS

Whereas the fourth Friday of each April is National Children’s Memorial Flag Day, when many State and local

governmental agencies and private organizations fly the

Children’s Memorial Flag to remember children lost to violence and to heighten public awareness of the need for

communities to help vulnerable children and families:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) supports National Children’s Memorial Flag

4 Day; and

5 (2) encourages national, State, and local agen6 cies and private organizations to fly the Children’s

7 Memorial Flag—

8 (A) to remember children lost to violence;

9 and

10 (B) to raise public awareness about the

11 continuing problem of violence against children.

Passed the House of Representatives April 26, 2001.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.