alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 143

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued honoring Paul Leroy Robeson.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 24, 2001

Mr. RUSH (for himself, Mr. HILLIARD, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. CARSON of Indiana,

Ms. MCKINNEY, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr.

ROSS, Mr. FILNER, Mrs. CLAYTON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. NORTON, Mr.

CLYBURN, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. CLAY, Mr. HOLT, Mr. MCGOVERN,

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. BONIOR, Mr. TOWNS, Mrs.

JONES of Ohio, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi,

Mr. WYNN, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. FROST, Mr. FORD,

Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. OWENS, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. SHIMKUS, Ms. LEE,

Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MEEKS of New

York, Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. BARRETT of Wisconsin, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. SOLIS, Ms. DELAURO, Mrs. MINK

of Hawaii, Mr. STARK, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mrs. MORELLA,

Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. HONDA, Mr. ANDREWS, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr.

BORSKI, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. NADLER, Mr. WATT of North Carolina, and Ms. WATERS) submitted the following concurrent resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued honoring Paul Leroy

Robeson.

Whereas April 9, 2001, was the 103rd anniversary of the

birth of Paul Leroy Robeson;
2

•HCON 143 IH

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson lost his mother, Anna, in a

household fire, and was reared in humble circumstances

as one of five children in a single-parent household by his

father, William Drew Robeson, a Presbyterian minister

who graduated from Lincoln University;

Whereas, despite difficult circumstances, as a child Paul

Leroy Robeson showed significant promise as an honor

student, thespian, and athlete;

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson was a member of both the Phi

Beta Kappa and Cap and Skull honor societies at Rutgers University and graduated in 1919 with letters in

basketball, baseball, discus, shot put, football, and javelin;

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson graduated from Columbia Law

School in 1923, but found the legal profession so resistant to African-American lawyers that he embarked on a

career in the theater and arts which brought him world

renown; and

Whereas Paul Leroy Robeson became an advocate for the

rights of African-Americans and other oppressed people,

and in so doing sacrificed his career as a world-renowned

actor and singer: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 Paul Leroy Robeson; and
3

•HCON 143 IH

1 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

2 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

3 such a stamp be issued.

Æ
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      by the Chief Executive Officer**


**of**


**Boardwalk
      GP, LLC**


**pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**(as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief executive officer of Boardwalk
      GP, LLC hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the quarterly report
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, (the "Report") of Boardwalk
      Pipeline Partners, LP (the “Partnership”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





April
      30,
      2007


*/s/
      Rolf A. Gafvert*


Rolf
      A.
      Gafvert


Chief
      Executive Officer


(principal
      executive officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 8 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 8

Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Frist) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Wesley S. Williams, Jr. as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the 
United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of 
the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of 
Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Wesley 
S. Williams, Jr. of the District of Columbia, is filled by 
reappointment of the incumbent for a term of 6 years, effective April 
12, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 242 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 242

    Notifying the President that the Senate is ready to proceed to 
                               business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2000

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Notifying the President that the Senate is ready to proceed to 
                               business.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate inform the President of 
the United States that a quorum of the Senate is assembled and that the 
Senate is ready to proceed to business.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re The State of Texas, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-14-00011-CR * January 16, 2014

 * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has considered the State of Texas’s motion to dismiss his application 

for emergency stay and writ of mandamus relating to trial court cause nos. 13-4347, 

13-4370, and 13-4373 and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the proceeding is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Southern Community Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented.











/s/ Thomas W. Winfree

May 13, 2005

Thomas W. Winfree

Date

Chief Executive Officer











/s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

May 13, 2005

C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr.

Date

Chief Financial Officer
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 21-50382

consolidated with Nos. 21-50384, 21-50398 Summary Calendar

United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee ,

versus
Sergio Rodriguez-Garcia,
Defendant—Appellant

.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 7:16-CR-88-1 USDC No. 7:12-CR-306-1 USDC No. 4:20-CR-537-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: *

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 15, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-50382 Document: 00516056207 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2021No. 21-50382 c/w Nos. 21-50384, 21-50398

2 Sergio Rodriguez-Garcia appeals th e sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentr y, as well as the revocations of the terms of supervised release he was serv ing at the time of the offense. Because his brief does not address the validity of the revocations or the revocation sentences, he has abandoned any challenge to them. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The sole argument Rodriguez-Garcia raises on appeal is that the enhancement of his sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) is unconstitutional because the fact of a prior conviction must be charged and proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He acknowledges this argument to be foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance or, in th e alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief. The Supreme Court held in Almendarez-Torres that for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a fact that must be alleged in an indictment or found beyo nd a reasonable doubt by a jury. 523 U.S. at 239-47. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court decisions such as Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 (2013), and Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See, e.g. , United States v. Wallace , 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano , 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). Therefore, Rodriguez-Garcia is correct that his argument is foreclosed, and summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED , the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is
DENIED , and the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED

. Case: 21-50382 Document: 00516056207 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/15/2021
#### FENDEV, INC., John R. Fenn, Jr. and Bonnie A. Fenn, Appellants, v. BROWNELL & HENDERSON, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 87-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 18, 1987.

Robert W. Boos of Taub & Williams, P.A., Tampa, for appellants.

Ted R. Manry, III of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to the appellants’ and appel-lee’s “Stipulation and Joint Motion for Reversal and Remand for Further Proceedings,” we reverse and remand this case to the trial court with instructions to conduct further proceedings and award reasonable costs and attorney’s fees to the appellants with respect to the injunctive action, and to determine whether the appellants are entitled to attorney’s fees and costs with respect to the declaratory judgment action, and, if so, to award the reasonable amount of such fees and costs.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
#### Andra JACKSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58203.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 11, 1989.

Ronald M. Kirk, Kirk & Nelson, Madison, for appellant.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Madison County; Alfred G. Nichols, Jr., Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.

PITTMAN, J., not participating.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended September 30, 2007 of the MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.


Date:
        November 14, 2007
 
 /s/
        Samuel Masucci,
        III
 Samuel
        Masucci, III
 On
        behalf
        of the Registrant
 and
        as
        Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF VULCAN
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.  THIS INFORMATION IS SUMMARIZED FROM THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000848446
<NAME> VULCAN INTERNATIONAL

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,141,676
<SECURITIES>                                71,855,745
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,978,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                   260,417
<INVENTORY>                                    611,959
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,900,356
<PP&E>                                      14,873,913
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,375,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,415,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,500,085
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       249,939
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,245,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                82,415,593
<SALES>                                     11,958,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,752,682
<CGS>                                       11,336,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,336,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (22,430)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,180,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                   394,809
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,785,805
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,785,805
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.44


</TABLE>
#### ASHY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. Louis C. MATTE.

No. 86-C-2572.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Ashy Enterprises, Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-15; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-2648-D.

Prior report: La.App., 497 So.2d 1048.

Denied.

MARCUS and WATSON, JJ., would grant the writ.
Date: October 15, 2008 PARTICIPATING SHAREHOLDERS           ACKNOLWEDGED AND AGREED: /s/ Mark W. Blackman             Mark W. Blackman      80 Deepwood Road  MARINER PARTNERS, INC. Darien, CT 06820               LIONSHEAD INVESTMENTS LLC           By: /s/ William J. Michaelcheck                            By: /s/ John N. Blackman, Jr.                 John N. Blackman, Jr.               By: /s/ Kathleen Blackman                 Kathleen Blackman               /s/ Robert G. Simses             Robert G. Simses      (as trustee of the Louise Blackman Trusts)
##### 



Exhibit 10.123
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
2005 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
 [Originally Adopted Effective February 28, 1994;
Most Recent Amendment and Restatement Effective May 20, 2005;
This Amendment and Restatement Effective January 1, 2008]
 1. Purpose of the Plan
  2. Definitions
  Section 6(d)
  Section 5(b)
          1




---



##### 



Section 5(a)
   Section 5(d)
   Section 5 Section 6
 Section 5 Section 6
   3. Administration of the Plan
  2




---



##### 



4. Stock Reserved for the Plan
 provided Section 12
 5. Awards
 Initial Grant to New Directors Section 5(a) Section 6
 Annual Grant Section 5(b) Section 6
 Determination of Number of Shares Section 5(a) 5(b) Section 5(a) 5(b) provided
 Restricted Stock Units or Options in Lieu of Shares of Restricted Stock Section 6
 3




---



##### 



Section 7
 Vesting Section 5(a) Section
5(b) Section 6 Section 7 Section 5(a) 5(b) Section 5(e)
 Adjustments to Amount of Initial Grants and Annual Grants Section 5(a) provided, however Section 5(b) provided, however
 Awards to Designee Directors
 6. Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
 Issuance of Certificates for Restricted Stock Section 5(a) 5(b) provided
    4




---



##### 



Section 5(e)
 Issuance of Certificates or Cash Payment Upon Vesting of RSUs provided Section 6(a) Section 5(d)
 Restrictions on Transfer Section 6(c)
 Voting and Dividend Rights Section
6(c) provided, however, Section 6(b)
 Deferral of Issuance of Common Stock Upon Vesting of RSUs
 5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



7. Options
 Exercise Price
 Option Agreement
 Term and Exercise of Options
 Procedure for Exercise of Options Section 7(e)
 Cashless Exercise
 Termination of Options
   7




---



##### 



Section 7(f)
 Assignability of Options Section 7(g) Section 7(e) Section 7(g)
 No Rights as a Stockholder Section 12
 8. Election Regarding Cash Fee Awards
 Election to Receive Equity in Lieu of Cash Fee Awards
 Determination of Number of Shares Subject to Cash Fee Awards provided
 Vesting
 8




---



##### 



9. Extraordinary Corporate Transactions
 Section 11
  Section 9
 10. Investment Representations
    11. Amendment or Termination
 provided, however,
 9




---



##### 



12. Changes in the Companys Capital Structure
     13. Compliance With Other Laws and Regulations
  10




---



##### 



14. Limitation of Liability; Indemnification of Committee and Board of Directors
  15. Effective Date; Expiration of the Plan
  Dated: October 24, 2007.ALLIED WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.,
a Delaware corporationBy
 11
#### Phyllis Smith GRANT v. Joseph Ulysses GRANT III.

Civ. 5729.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

June 17, 1987.

Deborah Hill Biggers, Tuskegee, for appellant.

David Barnes of Barnes, Dunning, May & Miller, Birmingham, for appellee.

*272HOLMES, Judge.

This is a child custody case.

A divorce was granted, and custody of the four minor children was awarded to the father.

The mother appeals and we affirm.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in awarding custody of the children to the father.

At the outset we note that there is a strong presumption in favor of the trial court’s findings in child custody cases. *Cory v. Cory,*429 So.2d 1096 (Ala.Civ.App.1983). As in all cases where judgment is rendered after an *ore tenus*hearing, the judgment of the trial court is presumed correct and will be reversed on appeal only if found to be plainly and palpably wrong. *Cokely v. Cokely,*469 So.2d 635 (Ala.Civ.App.1985). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court. *Smith v. Smith,*448 So.2d 381 (Ala.Civ.App.1984).

The mother argues that there was insufficient evidence presented to prove that she was an unfit parent and custody should, therefore, not have been awarded to the father. The mother’s contention is misplaced.

It must be recognized that the mother is no longer given the legal presumption of primary right to custody of even small children in the event of divorce. *Smith,*448 So.2d 381; *Devine v. Devine,*398 So.2d 684 (Ala.Civ.App.), *cert. denied,*398 So.2d 686 (Ala.1980). There is no law in this state which gives to either parent priority as to the right of custody. *Cory,*429 So.2d 1096. The polestar in custody matters now is truly the best interests of the child.

This court pretermits a detailed summary of the evidence. However, we do note that there was evidence that the mother was having an “adulterous relationship” which led her to leave her very young children home alone at nights. Further, the record reveals that the father wanted the children to live with him and has made arrangements for them to do so.

In any event, suffice it to say that we have carefully read the transcript, and in view of the above-stated principles of law, we find no plain and palpable abuse of discretion by the trial court in awarding custody of the minor children to the father.

This case is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

BRADLEY, P.J., and INGRAM, J., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

  

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-119525, 333-119524, 333-104261, 333-07957, 333-98307, 333-75215, 333-46324, 333-98309, 333-73586 and 333-73576) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-115627 and 333-98237) of Neurogen Corporation of our report dated March 11, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.****

 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 Hartford, Connecticut March 11, 2005