alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Samuel Masucci, III, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the MacroShares $100 Oil Down Trust;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors, the board of managers of Macro Securities Depositor, LLC, and the audit committee of MacroMarkets LLC (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2008

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Samuel Masucci, III                                       
| | Samuel Masucci, III                                           
| | Chief Executive Officer of Depositor, 
on behalf of Registrant
#### HAWTHORNE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, and Federal Insurance Company, Appellants, v. EXECUTONE SYSTEMS, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 87-2923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 12, 1988.

Gary M. Stein of Rosenberg & Reisman, Miami, for appellants.

Lee B. Gartner of Lee B. Gartner, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

LETTS, Judge.

In this controversy between a supplier and a subcontractor, the former was granted a motion for summary judgment for the *1065unpaid balance of supplies and labor furnished to a hospital. We reverse.

There are obvious unresolved issues of material fact. Affirmative defenses and an affidavit filed by the subcontractor bring into question whether it is liable for this balance. There is evidence in the record that the supplier was dealing directly with the hospital, the hospital itself was ordering supplies and the supplier accepted partial payments directly from the hospital.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
ixr-c?sr-2.^^o-(,f^g 

January 7, 2011 ''^f PARTMENT OF 

•ANSPORWION 

Op-RATIOr' t; 10 

Mr. Dennis DeVany , ^ • "^ n c 

Essential Air Service Chief US DOT ^H J^tt " 1 A lU- Uo 

EAS and Domestic Analysis Div. 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

W86-471 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany. 

The purpose of this communication is to seek your support in acknowledging the need to allow a 

competitive Request for Proposal to be issued to operate scheduled commercial services under an Essential 

Air Services (EAS) subsidy for Kalaupapa Settlement, on the island of Molokai, in Hawai'i. I/we need 

consideration for lower fares for all flights going to and from Kalaupapa. 

As you are aware. Pacific Wings has been the sole carrier serving Kalaupapa. I am grateful to have had 

their services, but the amount that I/we have been paying to fly with them has been a burden, financially. I 

live in Kaunakakai, Molokai (what is referred to as topside Molokai) but I work in Kalaupapa. The cost to 

fly down/up for a one way is between $244-$249 for less than 10 minutes. Yet, the cost to fly from topside 

to Maui or O'ahu can cost less than $70 for half an hour. This is and has been an injustice to the people 

who live and work in Kalaupapa. 

Also, Kalaupapa is a National Park. The lower fares will allow more people to come and visit this 

historically, beautiful and tranquil place. 

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to a reply at your convenience. 

Sincerely, 

Louise K. Linker
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 169 (Thursday, August 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52782-52783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21421]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7998]

Certification Related to Colombian Armed Forces Under the 
Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs 
Appropriations Act, 2012

    Pursuant to the section 7045(a) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L. 112-74) (``FY 2012 SFOAA'') and Delegation of Authority 245-1, I 
hereby certify and report that the Colombian Armed Forces and the 
Government of Colombia are meeting the conditions contained in section 
7045 of the Joint Explanatory Statement that accompanies the FY 2012 
SFOAA.

[[Page 52783]]

    This Certification shall be published in the Federal Register, and 
copies shall be transmitted to the appropriate committees of Congress.

    Dated: August 20, 2012.
Wendy R. Sherman,
Under Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21421 Filed 8-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)





OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary
Campanaro, Senior Vice President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge that:




1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
August 12, 2010





/s/ Gary CampanaroGary
      CampanaroSenior
      Vice PresidentEPL
      Intermediate, Inc.




This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by
EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit** **32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|           | /s/ Michael R. Whyte                         |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------|
| March 30, 2007 | Michael R. Whyte                             |
|           | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Clyde ALLEN.

No. 85-K-2304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Allen, Clyde; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17286-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 125570.

Prior report: La.App., 478 So.2d 589.

Granted as to assignment number 3; otherwise denied. Consolidate with 85-K-2259.
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John D. Watt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Tengtu International Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a 14 and 15d 14) for the registrant and we have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;


         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    October 15, 2003


/s/ John D. Watt
---------------------
John D. Watt
President
#### KAISER ALUMINUM EXPLORATION COMPANY, et al. v. The Honorable Herbert W. THOMPSON, Commissioner of Conservation and Assistant Secretary, Office of Conservation of the State of Louisiana.

No. 88-C-1036.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Thompson, Herbert W., Comm. Cons.; Celeron Oil & Gas Co. — Other; First Energy Corp. — Other; Union Texas Petroleum Corp. — Other; TXO Production Corporation — Other; Borden Inc. — Other; Terra Resources Inc. — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA86 1277, CA86 1278; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 294908, 294909.

Prior report: La.App., 523 So.2d 240.

Granted. Judgment of court of appeal is reversed. Judgment of district court is reinstated.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18817-18818]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7459]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 019778N.
    Name: FT Worldwide, LLC.

[[Page 18818]]

    Address: 2979 Rushland Road, Jamison, PA 18929.
    Date Revoked: January 23, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

    License Number: 021513N.
    Name : Camden Shipping Corporation.
    Address: 56 Georgetown Road, Bordentown, NJ 08505.
    Date Revoked: February 29, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

    License Number: 022991N.
    Name: Whale Logistics, LLC.
    Address: 84-43 Penelope Avenue, New York, NY 11379.
    Date Revoked: February 20, 2012.
    Reason: Voluntarily surrendered license.

Vern W. Hill,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2012-7459 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned hereby certifies that theQuarterly Report on Form  10-Q of Trinity Partners AcquisitionCompany Inc. (the "Registrant") for theperiod from inception (April 14, 2004) through June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), fully complies with therequirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theRegistrant.

Dated:   September 13,2004

|  | /s/ LawrenceBurstein |
|--|----------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | LawrenceBurstein President and Treasurer(Principal Executive andFinancial Officer) |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

12

----
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


YANKEE ENERGY SYSTEM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share Computation

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       For the Years Ended September 30
                       --------------------------------
                            1998         1997         1996
                            ----         ----         ----
                       (In thousands,except share data)
<S>                  <C>          <C>          <C> 
Net Income                10,883       16,957       21,919
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
 
Basic                 10,495,806   10,451,165   10,435,231
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Stock Options              5,605        2,153        2,230
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Diluted               10,501,411   10,453,318   10,437,461
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Basic Earnings
 Per Share           $      1.04  $      1.62  $      2.10
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
 
Diluted Earnings
 Per Share           $      1.04  $      1.62  $      2.10
                     -----------  -----------  -----------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1




                              Accountants' Consent







The Board of Directors
Dakota Mining Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File No.
33-68872) on Form S-8 of Dakota Mining  Corporation of our report dated February
4,  1997,  except as to Note 2, which is as of  February  6, 1997 and Note 6(c),
which is as of February 28, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Dakota Mining Corporation and subsidiaries as at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 1996,
which report is incorporated by reference in the December 31, 1996 annual report
on Form 10-K of Dakota Mining Corporation.





KPMG


Toronto, Canada
March 27, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday April 27, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7451 Filed 3-26-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 32.1   STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Village Bank and Trust Financial Corp. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on their knowledge and belief: (1) the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented.      /s/ Thomas W. Winfree August 11, 2006 Thomas W. Winfree Date Chief Executive Officer      /s/ C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. August 11, 2006 C. Harril Whitehurst, Jr. Date Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50795

HARLAN D. VANDER ZEE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STONE OAK BANKSHARES, INC., ET AL.

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(93-CV-184)

May 19, 1997

Before DUHÉ, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harlan D. Vander Zee (“Vander Zee”) filed suit against Stone Oak Bankshares, Inc. and

Stone Oak National Bank (“Stone Oak”), and their liability carrier, Fidelity & Deposit Co. of

Maryland (“F & D”), for various claims including breach of contract, conspiracy and intentional

infliction of emotional distressrelated to Vander Zee’sindictment onmoneylaundering charges while

he was employed as an executive vice-president of Stone Oak National Bank in San Antonio, Texas.

Among the claims Vander Zee asserted, were claimsthat Stone Oak breached an oral contract by not

rehiring him after the money laundering litigation was over, and that Stone Oak breached a contract
 

1The Court is aware that pursuant to a 1991 amendment, a judgment N.O.V. is now renamed as

a judgment as a matter of law, but for purposes of consistency we utilize the terms used by the

parties. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 50.

2

to pay his criminal attorney’sfeesincurred defending the money laundering charges. Before the case

was submitted to the jury, the district court granted Stone Oak’s and F & D’s motion for summary

judgment and motion for directed verdict, dismissing the conspiracy claims and intentional infliction

of emotional distress claims. The breach of contract claims were submitted to a jury, which found that

Stone Oak had breached contractual promises to Vander Zee and proximately caused him $293,750

in damages. Stone Oak moved for a judgment N.O.V.1 The court granted the motion in part, entering

a take-nothing verdict on Vander Zee’s re-employment claim and his claim for attorney’s fees in

bringing this action. The court awarded Vander Zee $43,750 in breach of contract damages on his

criminal attorney’s fees claim, plus pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.

On appeal, Vander Zee makes several arguments, some of which are not relevant to this

appeal. The issues pertinent to this appeal are Vander Zee’s claims that the district court erred in

granting summary judgment and a directed verdict on the conspiracy and intentional infliction of

emotional distress claims, and erred in entering a judgment N.O.V. on the contract claims. After

carefully reviewing the briefs and the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in

its memorandum order. See Vander Zee v. Stone Oak National Bank, et al., No. A-94-CA-020-SS

(W.D.Tex. Oct. 5, 1995).

AFFIRMED.