alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned officer of NYMAGIC, INC. (the Corporation) hereby certifies that the Corporations Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the applicable reporting
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Corporation. March 12, 2010
    
    /s/ Thomas J. IacopelliThomas J. IacopelliChief Financial Officer
  6
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 53

To designate March 24, 1999, as ‘‘National School Violence Victims’

Memorial Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 25, 1999

Mr. HUTCHINSON (for himself, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. SPECTER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. DEWINE,

Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. HELMS, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. ENZI, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr.

BIDEN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. BINGAMAN,

Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. SARBANES,

Mr. BURNS, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. REED, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. KOHL, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr.

KERREY, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mrs. LINCOLN, and Mr.

LIEBERMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate March 24, 1999, as ‘‘National School Violence

Victims’ Memorial Day’’.

Whereas approximately 10 percent of all public schools reported at least 1 serious violent crime to a law enforcement agency over the course of the 1996–97 school year;

Whereas in 1996, approximately 225,000 students between

the ages of 12 and 18 were victims of nonfatal violent

crime in schools in the United States;
2

•SRES 53 IS

Whereas during 1992 through 1994, 76 students and 29 nonstudents were victims of murders or suicides that were

committed in schools in the United States;

Whereas because of escalating school violence, the children of

the United States are increasingly afraid that they will

be attacked or harmed at school;

Whereas efforts must be made to decrease incidences of

school violence through an annual remembrance and prevention education; and

Whereas the Senate encourages school administrators in the

United States to develop school violence awareness activities and programs for implementation on March 24,

1999: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates March 24, 1999, as ‘‘National

3 School Violence Victims’ Memorial Day’’; and

4 (2) requests the President to issue a proclama5 tion designating March 24, 1999, as ‘‘National

6 School Violence Victims’ Memorial Day’’ and calling

7 on the people of the United States to observe the

8 day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 ACCERIS COMMUNICATIONS INC.OFFICERS CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350) October 25, 2004 The undersigned Allan C. Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of
Acceris Communications Inc., a Florida corporation (the Corporation), in
connection with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the annual
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby represent, warrant
and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Corporation. /s/ Allan C. SilberAllan SilberChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23**
**Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants**
We have issued our report dated August 19, 2003, accompanying the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Ace CashExpress, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003.We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in theRegistration Statements of Ace Cash Express, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8(File No. 33-55898) filed on December 17, 1992, (File No. 333-2640) filed onMarch 15, 1996, (File No. 333-62571) filed on August 31, 1998, (File No.333-44832) filed on August 30, 2000 and (File No. 333-83460) filed on February27, 2002.
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Dallas, Texas
#### J. Minos SIMON d/b/a Dixieland Farm v. FASIG-TIPTON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. et al.

No. 86-CC-2480.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Simon, J. Minos d/b/a; Dixieland Farm; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus and prohibition; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-1058; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 85-6761.

Denied.
#### The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Kilby HOLTON, Appellee.

No. 87-1608.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 13, 1988.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Thomas G. Murray, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BASKIN, J., and JOSEPH P. McNULTY, Associate Judge.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The sole point on this state appeal from an order discharging the defendant under the speedy trial rule claims that the defendant’s demand for a speedy trial was not “filed” in the clerk’s office. It makes this contention notwithstanding the trial court’s finding, on ample evidence, that the notice was indeed filed and the undisputed fact that it was in any case timely served on the office of the state attorney, which ignored it.

This appeal is thus no more than a frivolous, transparent attempt to shift the burden of the dismissal from the prosecution to the judiciary. Its filing below by the state attorney and its continuation here by the attorney general represent an imposition upon the courts and demean those offices and the state of Florida which they represent. Our previous admonition to the state “that this court should not again be burdened with cases of such obvious lack of merit,” *State v. Rodriguez,*515 So.2d 330, 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), has apparently gone unheeded. We will not tolerate its happening again.

AFFIRMED.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07400

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07400\07400_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07400\07400_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07400\07400_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07400\07400_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07400\07400_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07400\07400_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07400\07400_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07400\07400_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

07400\Certification Statement_07400.pdf Plant Certification PDF

x 07400\Plant Contact\07400_Copy of Part D_Modified_8 9 10(1).XLS Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 07400\Plant Contact\07400_Part C_Revision.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 07400\Plant Contact\07400_RE Steam Electric Follow-Up Questions - Thomas Hill.doc

Email communications regarding questions on the 

survey response

x 07400\Plant Contact\07400_Steam Electric Follow-Up Questions - Thomas Hill.doc

Email communications regarding questions on the 

survey response

07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_map2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-EN.Analysis-1977.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-Pond1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-Pond10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-Pond6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-Pond7.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_TH-Pond8.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07400\Supporting Documentation\07400_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### A.D., a child, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2983.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Anne Owens, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kim W. Munch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

A.D., a child, appeals a final order adjudicating him guilty of having committed a delinquent act. We reverse.

The appellant was charged with trespass on a construction site and criminal mischief. Both offenses were alleged to have occurred on July 23, 1986. At the appellant’s adjudicatory hearing, an employee of Kearney Development Corporation testified that when he arrived for work at the company’s construction site on the morning of July 24, 1986, he found that the company’s hydraulic pump had been torn apart. The employee, however, did not see who had damaged the pump. A fourteen year old friend and neighbor of the appellant testified that around five o’clock on a day in late July the appellant and his codefendant came to the witness’s house saying they had “messed up” some machinery which was being used to pump water out of some springs. This witness testified that the appellant and his codefendant had grease on their hands and shirts. He, however, could not remember the exact date on which they had come to his house. Although the teenage witness testified that there was a construction site near his neighborhood, he never testified that the machinery appellant claimed to have dam*348aged was located at any particular construction site, and no other evidence was submitted which placed the appellant at the scene of the crime. The appellant’s employer testified that the time cards he kept on all employees indicated that on the day the crime was alleged to have been committed, the appellant reported for work at 7:30 a.m. and that he drove the appellant home no earlier than 6:00 p.m. that evening. The two job sites on which the appellant worked that day were ten and twenty-five miles from the site where the pump was damaged. The court adjudicated the appellant guilty, and he timely filed notice of appeal.

A conviction which, as here, is based solely upon circumstantial evidence cannot be sustained unless every reasonable hypothesis of innocence is excluded. *Bailey v. State,*442 So.2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). It is not enough that the facts may create a strong probability of guilt. *Owen v. State,*432 So.2d 579 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Here, there is at least a reasonable hypothesis that the damage appellant claimed to have done was done at some other location and on some other day than that of the crimes charged. We, accordingly, must reverse the trial court’s order adjudicating the appellant guilty of committing a delinquent act.

Reversed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Rancho La Valencia, Inc. and Charles R. “Randy” Turner  From the 201st District Court Of Travis County Appellants v. No. 07-06-00157-CV  November 9, 2011 Aquaplex, Inc. and James Edward Jones, Jr.  Opinion by Justice Hancock Appellees JUDGMENT Pursuant to the opinion of the Court, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court on lia bility for fraud in the execut ion of the MSA is affirmed, but remand to the trial court for a new trial on the issue of damages, including the amount of punitive damages. It is further ordered that appellants pay all costs in this behalf expended for which let execution issue. It is further ordered that this decis ion be certified below for observance. o O o
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 333-129522, 333-119525, 333-119524, 333-104261, 333-07957, 333-98307,
      333-75215, 333-46324, 333-98309, 333-73586 and 333-73576) and Form S-3 (Nos.
      333-115627 and 333-98237) of Neurogen Corporation of our report dated March
      14,
      2006 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the
      effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
      of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
      10-K.




/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Hartford,
      Connecticut


March
      14,
      2006
#### Ex parte ROBINSON BROTHERS LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC. (Re ROBINSON BROTHERS LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. a Corp. v. B & B AUTO SALES, INC., a Corporation, and Billy Crane, individually and jointly).

87-489.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 24, 1988.

Richard G. Alexander of Alexander and Knizley, Mobile, for petitioner.

Ralph Loveless of Loveless and Banks, Mobile, for respondents.

STEAGALL, Justice.

In denying the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as agreeing with all the reasoning expressed *1303in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, 527 So.2d 1300.

WRIT DENIED.

JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6670

DE’MARION WILSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

G. WASHINGTON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00265-HEH)

Submitted: October 17, 2007 Decided: November 15, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

De’Marion Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

De’Marion Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Wilson has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 14 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Rotunda of the Capitol is authorized to be used on April 18, 
2001, for a ceremony as part of the commemoration of the days of 
remembrance of victims of the Holocaust. Physical preparations for the 
ceremony shall be carried out in accordance with such conditions as the 
Architect of the Capitol may prescribe.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            H. CON. RES. 14

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Permitting the use of the Rotunda of the Capitol for a ceremony as part 
   of the commemoration of the days of remembrance of victims of the 
                               Holocaust.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Leroy WILLIAMS.

No. 87-K-2661.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Williams, Leroy; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-KA-0308; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 149069.

Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 1117.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., recused.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7762

In Re: CHRISTOPHER R. WOODBERRY,

Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-05-1440-4; CR-02-40) Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 15, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher R. Woodberry, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Christopher Raphael Woodberry petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. He also requests expedited consideration of his petition. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant Woodberry’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in this court, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We deny Woodberry’s motion for expedited consideration as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
February 5, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ADRIAN DESHAWN PATTO N , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00101

- CR NO. 14

- 14

- 00102

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observanc e.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MELVIN IRVIN DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 1997, and the consolidated statement
of income for the year ended August 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000847414
<NAME>                        ILM SENIOR LIVING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                               3,136
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          202
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,446
<PP&E>                                              49,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                      12,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      40,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  259
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            116
<COMMON>                                                75
<OTHER-SE>                                          39,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        40,033
<SALES>                                              6,643
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     6,805
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,834
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,834
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .51
        

</TABLE>