alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months period
      ended September 30, 2007 of the MACROshares Oil Down Holding Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.




Date:
      November 14, 2007


/s/
        Samuel Masucci,
        III
 Samuel
        Masucci, III
 On
        behalf
        of the Depositor
 and
        as
        Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7576]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9653-6]


Environmental Financial Advisory Board; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental 
Financial Advisory Board (EFAB) will be renewed for an additional two-
year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, 
in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2. The purpose of EFAB is to provide advice and 
recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on issues associated with 
environmental financing.
    It is determined that EFAB is in the public interest in connection 
with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.
    Inquiries may be directed to Joseph L. Dillon, Director, Center for 
Environmental Finance, U.S. EPA, Ariel Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460 (Mail Code 2731A), Telephone (202) 564-
9679, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#197d70757576773773767c597c6978377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c0cdc8c8cbca8acecbc1e4c1d4c58ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Vanessa Bowie,
Acting Director, Center for Environmental Finance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7576 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0467**
#### Anthony FIELDS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-2609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Penny H. Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in *Hardie v. State,*513 So.2d 791 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987) (which is being simultaneously released with this opinion), we reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DOWNEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT
 
 I, Chien
Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby certify
that:
 
 (1)  I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Rotoblock Corporation;
 
 (2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 (5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.
  
 Dated: 
December 15, 2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ Chien
Chih Liu
 By: Chien
Chih Liu, Chief
Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Roger V. ATKINS v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-1845.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Atkins, Roger V.; applying for writ of habeas corpus; Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 82-384A; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18510-KH.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 21, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (414) 231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self-Employed Decreasing Non-Filers Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 21, 2012, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (414) 231-2360, or write TAP Office, Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 11, 2012.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-760 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL DE JESUS MEJIA

BERMUDEZ, AKA Carlos Hernandez

Bermudez, Petitioner,

v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 73023 Agency No. A200

- 696

- 353

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 15 , 2019 **
Before: FARRIS, LEAVY , and RAWLINSON , Circuit Judges.
Manuel De Jesus Mejia

- Bermudez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not preceden t except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner’s request for oral argument is denied. 

# FILED

OCT 22 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdictio n under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of withholding of removal for substantial evidence, and we review questions of law de novo. Guo v. Sessions , 897 F.3d 1208 , 1212 (9th Cir. 2018). We deny the petition for review

. We reject Mejia

- Bermudez’s c ontention that the BIA applied a n in correct legal standard in considering whether the record as a whole , including evidence of gang threats and extortion, established past persecution. See Duran

- Rodriguez v.
Barr , 918 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir

. 2019) ( rely ing on all of the surrounding events to decide whether there was persecution). S ubstantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that the past harm Mejia

- Bermudez suffered in El Salvador did not rise to the level of persecution

. See id

. (threats rise to the level of persecution only when they are so menacing as to cause significant actual suffering or harm); He v. Holder , 749 F.3d 792, 796 (9th Cir. 2014) (persecution may be established by a substantial economic disadvantage that interferes with the

a pplicant’s livelihood). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s finding that Mejia

- Bermudez failed to establish a clear probability of future persecution. See Tamang v. Holder , 598 F.3d 1083, 1094

- 95 (9th Cir. 2010) (fear of future persecution was not objectively reasonable). Thus, Mejia

- Bermudez’s withholding
of removal claim fails.3

The BIA did not err in denying Mejia

- Bermudez’s motion to terminate proceedings. See Karingithi v. Whitaker , 913 F.3d 1158 , 1160

- 62 (9th Cir. 2019) (initial notice to appear need not include time and date information to vest jurisdiction in the immigration court).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 387 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 387

Relative to the death of Representative Julian C. Dixon, of California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           December 11 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

 Mr. Hutchinson (for Mr. Lott and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relative to the death of Representative Julian C. Dixon, of California.

    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Julian C. Dixon, 
late a Representative from the State of California.
    Resolved, That the Secretary communicate these resolutions to the 
House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the 
family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns or recesses today, it stand 
adjourned or recessed as a further mark of respect to the memory of the 
deceased Representative.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Executive Officer of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

| | /s/ Thomas M. OFlynnThomas M. OFlynnChief Executive OfficerDate: November 9, 2007
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00187-CR

Dianna Wyrick RODRIGUEZ aka Dianna Emmarose Ring,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6190

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 13, 2015

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, 

and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and 

agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately reflects that the 

underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be 

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part 
04-14-00187-CR

of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). On April 9, 2015, we ordered that this 

appeal would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification 

showing that the appellant has the right of appeal was made part of the appellate record by May 7, 

2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). No response 

was filed. In the absence of an amended trial court certification showing that the appellant has the 

right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -
#### James C. WELCH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 84-1609.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Jan. 13, 1987.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Alan D. Sackrin, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See United States v. Dominguez,*604 F.2d 304 (4th Cir.1979), *cert. denied,*444 U.S. 1014, 100 S.Ct. 664, 62 L.Ed.2d 644 (1980); *United States v. Lanier,*578 F.2d 1246 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*439 U.S. 856, 99 S.Ct. 169, 58 L.Ed.2d 163 (1978); *United States v. Zuniga-Lara,*570 F.2d 1286 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*436 U.S. 961, 98 S.Ct. 3080, 57 L.Ed.2d 1128 (1978); *Volusia County Bank v. Bigelow,*45 Fla. 638, 33 So. 704 (1903); *Hines v. State,*425 So.2d 589 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), *rev. denied,*430 So.2d 452 (Fla.1983); *McElveen v. State,*415 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); *Sims v. State,*184 So.2d 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 9- 00 64 8- CV Da nie l GARZA and L y

nn Gar za, Ap pe lla nts
v . J esse F LOR ES III , Appellee Fr om the 79th J udicial District Court, J im W ells County , Texas

Tr ia l Co ur

t N o. 09 -0 1- 47 73 0CV Honora ble Richard C.Ter

rell, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dece mber 9, 2009 DI SMI SSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTI ON On Octobe r 26, 2009, the trial c ourt cler k filed a notification of late rec ord, stating that the appellants ha d failed to pa y or make arr ang ements t o pay the fe e for

prepa ring the cler

k’s re cord. We, there fore , order ed appellants to provide written proof to thi s court within ten day s of the date of the order that either (1) t he clerk’s fe e had be en paid or arr ang ements had be en made to pay the cler k’s fe e ; or (2 ) a pp e lla nt w a s e nti tle d to a

pp e a l w ith ou t pa

y ingthe cle rk’ s fee. We w a rn e d th a t if04
- 09
- 00 64 8- CV

- 2- appellants fa iled to respond within th e t i m e p ro vided, this appea l would be dismissed for wa nt of prosec ution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 37 .3 (b ). Ap pe lla nts fa ile d to re sp on d. Th e re fo re , w e dis mis s th is appea l for wa

nt of prosec ution.

PER C URI AM
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the quarterly report of Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. McGrath, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company. 

| /s/ Michael P. McGrath                                  |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                         |   |
| Michael P. McGrath                                      |   |
| Vice President, Treasurer   and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                                                    |   |
| Date: November 14, 2005                                 |   |
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 141

To authorize the printing of copies of the publication entitled ‘‘The United

States Capitol’’ as a Senate document.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MCCONNELL submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of copies of the publication entitled

‘‘The United States Capitol’’ as a Senate document.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the publication

3 entitled ‘‘The United States Capitol’’ (referred to as ‘‘the

4 pamphlet’’) shall be reprinted as a Senate document.

5 (b) There shall be printed a total of 2,850,000 copies

6 of the pamphlet in English and seven other languages at

7 a cost not to exceed $165,900 for distribution as follows:

8 (1)(A) 206,000 copies of the pamphlet in the

9 English language for the use of the Senate with

10 2,000 copies distributed to each Member;
2

•SCON 141 ATS

1 (B) 886,000 copies of the pamphlet in the

2 English language for the use of the House of Rep3 resentatives with 2,000 copies distributed to each

4 Member; and

5 (C) 1,758,000 copies of the pamphlet for dis6 tribution to the Capitol Guide Service in the fol7 lowing languages:

8 (i) 908,000 copies in English;

9 (ii) 100,000 copies in each of the following

10 seven languages: Spanish, German, French,

11 Russian, Japanese, Italian, and Korean; and

12 (iii) 150,000 copies in Chinese.

13 (2) If the total printing and production costs of

14 copies in paragraph (1) exceed $165,900, such num15 ber of copies of the pamphlet as does not exceed

16 total printing and production costs of $165,900,

17 shall be printed with distribution to be allocated in

18 the same proportion as in paragraph (1) as it relates

19 to numbers of copies in the English language.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2: Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  South  Texas  Oil  Company  (the
"Company") on Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  June 30, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I,  Jason F. Griffith,  Chief  Financial Officer of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to the best  of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                         ------------------------------------------
                         JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 10, 2005