# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 1 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# AIR OPERATING PERMIT

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency
110 Union Street, Suite 500 Seattle, Washington 98101

Issued in accordance with the provisions of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency (previously known as Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency ) Regulation I, Articl e 7 and Chapter 173-401

WAC.

Pursuant Lafarge North America Inc is authorized to operate subject to the terms and conditions in this permit.



# PERMIT NO.: 14046 DATE OF ISSUANCE : May 15, 2004 Modification Issued: July 28, 2004

ISSUED TO: Lafarge North America, Inc.



# PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE : May 15, 2009

SIC Code, Primary: 3241 Hydraulic Cement Manufacturing

NAICS Code 32731 Hydraulic Cement Manufacturing

Nature of Business: Hydraulic Cement Manufacturing

Mailing Address: 5400 West Marginal Way Southwest, Seattle WA, 98106-1599

Facility Address: 5400 West Marginal Way Southwest, Seattle WA, 98106-1599

Responsible Official: Tom Cr owningshield, Plant Manager

Telephone No.: (206) 937-8025

FAX No.: (206) 932-3803

Site Contact: Russ Simonson, Environmental Engineer

Telephone No.: (206) 937-8025

FAX No.: (206) 932-3803



# Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Approval :



# Fred L. Austin, P.E.

Permit Engineer Steven M. Van Slyke, P.E. Supervisory Engineer

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 2 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. EMISSION LIMITS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS 3

II. MONITORING, MAINTENANCE AND RECORDKEEPING

METHODS DESCRIPTION 57

III. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES 69

IV. ACTIVITIES REQUIRING ADDITIONAL APPROVAL 71

V. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS 74

VI. PERMIT ACTIONS 88

VII. PERMIT SHIELD 94

VIII. INAPPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS 95

IX. INSIGNIFICANT EMISSION UNITS 98

X. APPENDIXES 98

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 3 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# I. EMISSION LIMITS AN D PERFORMANCE STANDARDS

The following tables list the citation for the ìappli cable requirementî in the second column. The third column (Date) contains the adoption or effec tive date of the requirement. In some cases,

the effective dates of the Federa lly Enforceable Requirement and the State Only Requirement are different because only rules approved by EPA through Sections 110, 111, and 112 of the federal Clean Air Act are federally enforceable and eith er the state has not su bmitted the regulation to the EPA or the EPA has not approved it.

The first column is used as an identifier for the requirement, and the fourth (Requirement Paraphrase) column paraphrases the requireme nt. The first and fourth columns are for information only and are not enforceable conditions of this permit. The actual enforceable requirement is embodied in the requirement cited in the second and third columns.

The fifth column (Monitoring, Maintenance & R ecordkeeping Method) identifies the methods described in Section II of the permit. Followi ng these methods is an enforceable requirement of this permit. The sixth (Emission Standard Period) column identi fies the averaging time for the reference test method. The last column (Referen ce Test Method) identifie s the reference method associated with an applicable emission limit that is to be used if and when a source test is required. In some cases where the applicable requirement does not cite a test method, one has

been added.

In the event of conflict or omi ssion between the information cont ained in the f ourth and sixth columns and the actual statute or regulation c ited in the second column, the requirements and language of the actual statute or regulation cited shall govern. For more information regarding any of the requirements cited in the second and third columns, refer to the actual requirements

cited.Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 4 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004A. FACILITY-WIDE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSThe requirements in this section apply facility-wide toall the emission units regulated by this permit.Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.1Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg I: 9.03This requirement willbe superseded uponadoption of the3/11/99 version of RegI: 9.03 into the SIPPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9.03(State Only) Thisrequirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the9/08/94 version of RegI: 9.0309/08/9403/11/99Visible EmissionsShall not emit more than 20% opacityfor a period or periods aggregatingmore than 3 minutes in any 1-hourperiodII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 5 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.2WAC 173-400-040(1)This requirement willbe superseded uponadoption of the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(1)(State Only).This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the9/20/1993 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)09/20/939/15/01Visible EmissionsShall not emit more than 20% opacityfor more than 3 minutes in any 1-hourperiodII.A. 1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 6 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.3Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9.09(a)This requirement shallbe superseded by the4/9/98 version of Reg.I: 9.09 upon itsadoption into the SIPPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg I: 9.09(State Only)This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the2/10/94 version of RegI: 9.09(a)02/10/9404/09/98Shall not emit particulate matter inexcess of 0.05 gr/dscf from equipmentused in a manufacturing processuncorrected for excess airII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 7 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.4WAC 173-400-060This requirement shallbe superseded by the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-060upon its adoption intothe SIPWAC 173-400-060(State Only)This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the3/22/91 version ofWAC 173-400-060.3/22/919/15/01Shall not emit particulate matter inexcess of 0.10 gr/dscf from generalprocess units, uncorrected for excessairII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 5(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 8 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.5Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg I: 9.07WAC 173-400-040(6)first paragraph only.This requirement shallbe superseded by the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(6)upon its adoption intothe SIPWAC 173-400-040(6)(State Only).This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the9/20/93 version ofWAC 173-400-040(6)04/14/9409/20/939/15/01Shall not emit SO2in excess of 1,000ppmv (dry) corrected to 7% O2for fuelburning equipmentNo monitoringrequiredAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 6C(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 9 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.6Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg I: 9.11This requirement willbe superseded uponadoption of the3/11/99 version of RegI: 9.11 into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(5)This requirement willbe superseded uponadoption of the12/23/00 version ofWAC 173-400-040(5)into the SIPPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg I: 9.11(State Only)This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the6/9/1983version ofReg I: 911(a).06/09/8309/20/9303/11/99Shall not emit air contaminants insufficient quantities and of suchcharacteristics and duration as is, or islikely to be, injurious to human health,plant or animal life,or property, orwhich unreasonablyinterferes withenjoyment of life and propertyII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(b) ComplaintResponseII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionunitsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 10 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.6 (cont.) WAC 173-400-040(5)(State Only).This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the9/20/93 version ofWAC 173-400-040(5)9/15/01I.A.7WAC 173-400-040(2)(State Only)9/15/01 Shall not deposit particulate matterbeyond property boundary insufficient quantity to interfereunreasonably with the use andenjoyment of the propertyII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(b) ComplaintResponseII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionsunitsII.A.1(f)RecordkeepingFacility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 11 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.8WAC 173-400-040(4)(State Only)9/15/01 Must use recognized good practiceand procedures to reduce odors whichmay unreasonably interfere with anyother property ownersí use andenjoyment of their propertyII.A.1(b) ComplaintResponseII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionsunitsII.A.1(f)RecordkeepingFacility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAI.A.9Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9.15(a)This requirement shallbe superseded by the3/11/99 version ofReg. I: 9.15(a) uponits adoption into theSIP8/10/89Must employ BACT for fugitive dust II.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 12 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.10WAC 173-400-040(3)WAC 173-400-040(8)These requirementsshall be superseded bythe 9/15/02 versions ofSIP WAC 173-400-040(3)&(8) uponadoption into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(3)(State Only)WAC 173-400-040(8)(State Only)These requirementswill become federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the9/20/93 versions ofWAC 173-400-040(3)&(8)9/20/939/15/01Shall not emit visible dust unlessreasonable precautions are employedto minimize emissions.II.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 13 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.11Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I:9.15(b) and 9.15(c)This requirement shallbe superseded by the3/11/99 version ofReg. I: 9.15(a) uponits adoption into theSIP8/10/89 Must employ measures to preventtrack-out and spillage of particulatematter on paved public roadwaysShall not emit fugitive dust from anyfuel burning equipment, equipmentused in a manufacturing process, orcontrol equipmentII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionunitsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 14 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.12Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9.15(a)(State Only)This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into the SIPand will replace the8/10/98version ofReg. I: 9.15 into theSIP3/11/99It shall be unlawful for any person tocause or allow visible emissions offugitive dust unless reasonableprecautions are employed to minimizethe emissions. Reasonableprecautions include, but are notlimited to, the following:(1) The use of control equipment,enclosures, and wet (or chemical)suppression techniques, as practical,and curtailment during high winds;(2) Surfacing roadways and parkingareas with asphalt, concrete, or gravel;(3) Treating temporary, low-trafficareas (e.g., construction sites) withwater or chemical stabilizers, reducingvehicle speeds, constructing pavementor rip rap exit aprons, and cleaningvehicle undercarriages before they exitto prevent the track-out of mud or dirtonto paved public roadways; or(4) Covering or wetting truck loads orallowing adequate freeboard toprevent the escape of dust-bearingmaterialsII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNANAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 15 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.13Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9:206/09/88 Must maintain equipment in goodworking orderII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionunitsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 16 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.14Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 7.09(b)This requirement shallbe superseded by the9/10/98 version ofReg. I: 7.09(b) uponits adoption into theSIPPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 7.09(b)This requirement willbecome federallyenforceable and willno longer be effectivein this table upon theadoption of the9/10/98 version ofReg. I: 7.09(b) into theSIP9/12/96 Must develop and implement an O&MPlan to assure continuous compliancewith Puget SoundClean Air AgencyRegulations I, II and IIIII.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(e) Maintenanceand repair ofinsignificant emissionunitsII.A.1(f)Recordkeeping,Facility-wide GeneralRequirementsII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsNA NAI.A.15WAC 173-400-040 09/20/93 Emissions from a common stack mustmeet the most restrictive standard ofany of the connected emissions unitsNA NA NAI.A.16Puget Sound Clean AirAgency Reg. I: 9.10(a)(State Only)06/09/88 Shall not emit HCl in excess of 100ppm (dry) corrected to 7% O2forcombustion sourcesNo monitoringrequiredAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 26(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A; July 1,2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 17 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodI.A.17RCW 70.94.040(StateOnly)1996 Shall not emit air contaminants insufficient quantities and of suchcharacteristics and duration as is, or islikely to be, injurious to human health,plant or animal life,or property, orwhich unreasonablyinterferes withenjoyment of life and property orcause a violation of RCW 70.94 orany regulation adopted hereunderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsNA NANA = Not ApplicablePermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 18 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004B. EMISSION UNIT SPECIFICAPPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSThe requirements in Section I.B. only applyto the specific emission unitscited; however, the requirements in Section I.A. also apply. Ifthe monitoring and recordkeeping method for any requirement in Section I.A was more extensive for specific emission units, therequirement was repeated in this section with theadditional monitoring and recordkeeping requirements.1.Emission Unit #1 (EU-1): RotaryCement Kiln ESP Main StackThis emission unit consists of a 500 footlong, 1354 ton/day capacity, rotary Portlandcement kiln fired with various fuels through severalburners and controlled by a 400,000 cfm (700F)100 KVA Electro-Static Precipitator. The main stack emissions are monitored foropacityand sulfur dioxide emissions by a continuous emission monitoringsystem. Solid, liquid, and gaseous fuels include bituminous coal,petroleum coke, tire-derived fuel, hog fuel, fuel oil, waste oil, residual oil(including tank bottom oil), and natural gas. Dust entrained inthe flue gases is collected in an electrostatic precipitator (ESP). The dust collected may be discarded, sold as a byproduct,or fed back intothe kiln process. Emissions exit from the ESP through a mainstack. A continuous emission monitoring system on the main stackmeasures opacity and SO2emissions.Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 19 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Table 2 Emission Unit # (EU-1)APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSReqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodGeneral Operations – State & LocalEU 1.1Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.20(a)6/09/1988 Must maintain sources approved under PugetSound Clean Air Agency Reg. I, Article 6 ingood working orderII.A(1)MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements(Facility-wide)II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsN/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 20 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.2RCW 70.94.152(7)(State Only)1996 Must maintain equipment in good workingorder.II.A(1)MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements(Facility-wide)II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 21 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodVisible EmissionsEU 1.3WAC 173-400-040(1)This requirementwill be supersededupon adoption of the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(1)(State Only).This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-040(1)09/20/939/15/01Shall not emit visible emissions more than 20%opacity for more than 3 minutes in any 1-hourperiodII.A(1)MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements(Facility-wide)II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 22 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.4Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(b)(1)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.04(c)(2) upon itsadoption into theSIP.02/10/94 CEMS 20% OpacityShall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emissions of any air contaminant (asdetermined by a continuous emissionmonitoring system) that is greater than 20%opacity for a period aggregating more than 3minutes in any 1 hour.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A.2(d)AlternateOpacityMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB July 1, 1997)EU 1.5Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.04(c)(2) (StateOnly)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP.When the 4/9/98version of 9.04(c)(2)is adopted into theSIP this standard of20% opacity for 6minutes in any onehour will allow botha CEM and visualEPA Method 904/09/98 CEMS or Visual 20% OpacityIt shall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emission of any air contaminantduring any hour that contains any consecutive6-minute period averaging greater than 20%opacity.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A.2(d)AlternateOpacityMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirements6-minuteperiodEPA Method 9(40 CFR 60, AppendixA, July 1, 2001EPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB, July 1, 1997)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 23 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodParticulate StandardsEU 1.6Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(a)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.09 upon itsadoption into theSIPPuget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09 (State Only)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 2/10/94 version02/10/9404/09/98Shall not emit particulate matter in excess of0.05 gr/dscf (uncorrected for excess air).II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A.2(d)AlternateOpacityMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 24 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.7WAC 173-400-060This requirementshall be supersededby the 9/15/01version of WAC173-400-060 uponits adoption into theSIPWAC 173-400-060(State Only) Thisrequirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-06009/20/939/15/01Shall not cause or permit the emission ofparticulate material in excess of 0.1 gr/dscf ofexhaust gas (uncorrected for excess air).II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A.2(d)AlternateOpacityMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 5(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)SO2StandardsEU 1.8Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.07WAC 173-400-040(6) firstparagraph only4/14/19948/20/1993Shall not emit SO2in excess of 1,000 ppmv(dry)II.A.2(b) SO2CEMSII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirements1-houraverageEPA Method 6C (40CFR 60, Appendix A,July 1, 2001)(40 CFR 60, AppendixB , & Appendix F,7/1/19970Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 25 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodHCl StandardsEU 1.9Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.10(a)(STATEONLY)6/09/88Shall not emit HCl in excess of 100 ppm (dry) NA1-houraverage40 CFR 60, AppendixA, Reference Methods26 or 26A, 7/1/2001Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Ordersof Approval - Tire Fuel LimitsEU 1.10Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 3374Condition 57/10/91 Shall limit tire derived fuel (lb/hr) used in thekiln to less than 20% by weight of coal & coke(lb/hr) used.II.A.2(c) TireDerived FuelMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsMeasuringFrequencyHourly byBTU ofall fuelsCompliance Method forfuel BtuPuget Sound Clean Air Agency Ordersof Approval – Alternate OpacityEU 1.11Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 5183Condition 42/9/94 Shall be unlawful to cause or allow the kilnstack emissions to exceed 12% opacity for a 1-hour average.A violation of this opacity standard shall be aviolation of the particulate standard of 0.05gr/dscf in Regulation I, Section 9.09.II.A.2(d)AlternateOpacityMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirements1-houraverageContinuous OpacityMonitor40 CFR 60, AppendixA, Reference Method 5as modified by PugetSound Clean AirAgency Resolutiondated 8/11/1983Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 26 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodPuget Sound Clean Air Agency Ordersof Approval – Alternate FuelsEU 1.12Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 6202Condition 411/15/95 Shall use oils that are not dangerous wastemeeting WAC 173-303-090 Dangerous WasteCharacteristics, and WAC 173-303-515Standards for the Management of Used Oil.II.A.2(i) WasteDerived FuelMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsDailyaverageNAEU 1.13Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 6202Condition 5Cement Kiln Burnerand fuels permitted11/15/95 Shall limit replacement fuels to < 25% of theheat input to the kilnon daily average.II.A.2(i) WasteDerived FuelMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsDailyaverageNAEU 1.14Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 6202Condition 611/15/95Shall limit replacement fuels to none hazardousoil including the following:(a) Used Oil; (b) Refined Oil Tank Bottoms;(c) Raw Crude Tank Bottoms; (d) HeavyVacuum Gas Oil Waste; (e) Off SpecificationFuel Oil.II.A.2(i) WasteDerived FuelMonitoringII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsDailyaverageNAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 27 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.15Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 6202Condition 7Cement Kiln Burnerand fuels permitted11/15/95 Shall not burn waste derived fuels with:Ash greater than 50% by weight,Sulfur greater than 2.5% by weight,Lead greater than 1000 ppm by weight,Total Halogens greater than 5000 ppm byweight,PCB greater than 50 ppm by weight,Flash Point less than 100 degrees F,Heat Content either less than 5,000 or greaterthan 19,000 Btu/lb.II.A.2(i) WasteDerived FuelMonitoringII.A.2(m)Operation andMaintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAsh, ASTM D 482Sulfur, ASTM D 3120Lead, EPA 600/4-81-045, Method 200.7Total Halogens, EPASW-846 Method 9076PCB, EPA SW-846Method 8080FlashPoint, EPA SW846 Method 1020Heat Content, BombCalorimeterNESHAP General ProvisionsRequirement Nos. EU 1.16 through EU 1.60 are the NESHAP General Provisions, 40 CFR 63Subpart A, that apply to sources subjectto the PortlandCement NESHAP. Applicability of 40 CFR 63Subpart A is defined in Table 1 to Subpart LLL of Part 63. Table 1 supersedes thispermit if anapparent conflict exists. These General Provisions are included in this table because the kiln is the only affected source atLafarge under this NESHAP.The specific provisions identified reflect the applicable provisions of Subpart LLL that relate to this affected unit.EU 1.1640 CFR 63.1Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg III:2.024/5/0209/09/9940 CFR 63 Subpart A applies to Lafarge None required N/A N/AEU 1.1740 CFR 63.6 4/5/02 Lafarge shall comply with standards andmaintenance requirements of 40 CFR 63, PartA as relate to Subpart LLL.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 28 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.1840 CFR 63.6(e) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall develop and follow both an O&MPlan and a startup, shutdown, and malfunction(SSM) plan.None required N/A N/AEU 1.1940 CFR 63.6(e)(1)Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg III:2.024/5/0209/09/99Lafarge shall operate and maintain equipmentconsistent with good air pollution controlpractice at all times, including startup,shutdown, and malfunction. Lafarge shallcorrect malfunctions as soon as practicableafter their occurrence.NOTE: Additional O&M provisions in 40 CFRSubpart LLL.None required N/A N/AEU 1.2040 CFR 63.6(e)(3)(i) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall develop and implement a writtenstartup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) planto include the specified details.None required N/A N/AEU 1.2140 CFR63.6(e)(3)(ii)4/5/02 Lafarge shall operate the affected source inaccordance with SSM plan.None required N/A N/AEU 1.2240 CFR63.6(e)(3)(iii)4/5/02 Lafarge shall keeprecords which demonstrateprocedures in the SSM plan were followedduring startup, shutdown, and malfunctions.None required N/A N/AEU 1.2340 CFR63.6(e)(3)(iv)4/5/02 If actions by Lafarge are not consistent with theSSM plan, Lafarge shall report such actionswithin 2 working days of commencing theaction, followed by a letter within 7 workingdays after the end of the event.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 29 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.2440 CFR63.6(e)(3)(v)4/5/02 Lafarge shall keep the SSM plan on record andavailable for inspection, upon request.Previous versions shall also be on record andavailable for 5 years after each revision.None required N/A N/AEU 1.2540 CFR 63.6(e)(3) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall change the SSM plan if requiredby the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency if it isdetermined to be unacceptable under 40 CFR63.6(e)(2).None required N/A N/AEU 1.2640 CFR63.6(e)(3)(viii)4/5/02 Lafarge shall update the SSM plan within 45days of an SSM event which the existing planfailed to address or inadequately addressed.II.a.2(i)NESHAPSGeneralMonitoringEU 1.2740 CFR63.6(e)(3)(ix)4/5/02 Lafarge shall have an SSM plan whichconforms to the provisions of Part 63 and shalloperate and maintain the source in accordancewith the procedures in the current plan.II.a.2(i)NESHAPSGeneralMonitoringN/A N/AEU 1.2840 CFR 63.6(f) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall comply with the non-opacityemissions standards at all times except duringstartup, shutdown, and during malfunction.NOTE: Compliance with standards is based onsource tests, conformance with O&M Plan, andinspections.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 30 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.2940 CFR 63.7 4/5/02 Performance testing requirements. II.A.2 (j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsThreeruns, eachat leastone hour40 CFR 51, AppendixM, Reference Method204.40 CFR 60, AppendixA, Reference Methods2, 2A, 2C, 2D. 2F. or2G; 18 or 25A, orASTM D6420-99 inlieu of Method 25A.EU 1.3040 CFR 63.7(a)(1) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall meet the performance testingdates and requirements unless specified in 40CFR 63.7 or 40 CFR 63.1349.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3140 CFR 63.7(a)(2) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall follow the criteria of 40 CFR63.7(a)(2) for testing within 180 days of June10, 2002.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3240 CFR 63.7(a)(3) 4/5/02 Puget Sound Clean Air Agency has theauthority to require Lafarge to source tests atsuch times authorized by section 114 of theAct.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3340 CFR 63.7(b)(1)4/5/02 (b) Notification of performance test.(1) Lafarge shall notify Puget Sound Clean AirAgency within 60 days before scheduled teststo allow Puget Sound Clean Air Agency toapprove plan.Puget Sound Clean Air Agencyís observationsare optional.II.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting andRecordkeepingN/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 31 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.3440 CFR 63.7(b)(2)4/5/02 If a test must be delayed, Lafarge shall notifyPuget Sound Clean Air Agency within 5 daysof test date.During a test delay Lafarge shall continue tomeet all applicable requirements.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3540 CFR 63.7(c)(1) 4/5/02 QA data will be considered by Puget SoundClean Air Agency in determining the validityof performance tests.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3640 CFR 63.7(c)(2)(i) 4/5/02 Lafarge's source test plan shall followRegulation I, Section 3.07.Data quality objectives include expectedprecision, accuracy, data completeness andinternal and external QA.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3740 CFR63.7(c)(2)(ii)4/5/02 (ii) The internal QA program shall include,routine operators and analysis of data precision(i.e., analysis of replicate samples).None required N/A N/AEU 1.3840 CFR63.7(c)(2)(iii)4/5/02 (iii) The external QA program shall include,EPA audit samples. Puget Sound Clean AirAgency activities may include checks of fieldmaintenance, and data calibration, validationand quality control.None required N/A N/AEU 1.3940 CFR63.7(c)(2)(iv)4/5/02 (iv) Lafarge shall submit a source test plan toPuget Sound Clean Air Agency at least 60calendar days before scheduled date.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 32 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.4040 CFR63.7(c)(2)(v)4/5/02 (v) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may requestadditional information supporting the sourcetest plan.None required N/A N/AEU 1.4140 CFR 63.7(c)(3)(i) 4/5/02 (i) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency approves ordeny Lafarge's source test plan within 30calendar days of receiving either original orrequested information.Puget Sound Clean Air Agency notifies denialand provides 30 calendar days for additionalinformation.None required N/A N/AEU 1.4240 CFR63.7(c)(3)(ii)4/5/02(ii) If Puget Sound CleanAir Agency does notapproval or deny source test plan:(A) Lafarge shall follow EPA Methods withinspecified time periods, or(B) Lafarge shall wait for administratorapproval of alternate methods.None required N/A N/AEU 1.4340 CFR63.7(c)(3)(iii)4/5/02 (iii) Source shall remain in compliance with orwithout an approved source test plan.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 33 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.4440 CFR 63.7(c)(4) 4/5/02 (4)(i) Lafarge shall analyze samples duringeach compliance test. Lafarge shall requestaudit samples 45 days prior to test dates.Obtain cylinder audit gases, EPA.(ii) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency will havesole discretion to require Lafarge to conductany subsequent remedial actions of based onaudit results.(iii) If Puget Sound Clean Air Agency does notprovide audit samples to Lafarge in time foranalysis, analysis is not required.However, this waiver does not affect futureaudit sample analyzes.None required N/A N/AEU 1.4540 CFR 63.7(d) 4/5/02 (d) Lafarge shall provide testing facilities asrequired in 40 CFR 63.7(d)(1)-(5).None required N/A N/AEU 1.4640 CFR 63.7(e) 4/5/02 (e) Performance tests shall be conductedfollowing 40 CFR 63.7(e)(1)-(4).None required N/A N/AEU 1.4740 CFR 63.8(b) 4/5/02 Monitoring shall be conducted as set forth inthis section and the relevant standard (40 CFR63.1350(f)).II.A.2 (j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsN/A N/AEU 1.4840 CFR63.9(a)(4)(ii)2/12/99 After the State (or local agency) has beendelegated authority to implement and enforcenotification requirements under this subpart,Lafarge shall submit notifications under thissubpart to that delegated authority with anadditional copy to the EPA Regional office.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 34 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.4940 CFR 63.9(b)(3)-(b)(5)4/5/02 Lafarge shall notify Puget Sound Clean AirAgency, of construction or reconstruction ofnew affected source.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5040 CFR 63.9(g)(1) 4/5/02 Lafarge shall notify Puget Sound Clean AirAgency of the date the CMS performanceevaluation is scheduled to begin.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5140 CFR 63.9(i) 4/5/02 Lafarge may request Puget Sound Clean AirAgency approval to adjust postmark or timeperiod deadlines.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5240 CFR 63.9(j)4/5/02 Any change in the information alreadyprovided per 40 CFR 63.9 shall be sent to thePuget Sound Clean Air Agency within 15 days.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5340 CFR 63.104/5/02 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements None required N/A N/AEU 1.5440 CFR 63.10(a)(3)-(7)4/5/02 Lafarge shall send reports to EPA and thePuget Sound Clean Air Agency per 40 CFR63.10(a)(3)-(7) and may request changingreport due dates.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5540 CFR 63.10(b)(1)4/5/02 Lafarge shall retain files of all informationrequired by this part for at least 5 yearsfollowing the date of each action and record.At a minimum, records will be retained on siteat least two years, while the remaining threeyears may be retained offsite.None required N/A N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 35 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.5640 CFR 63.10(b)(2)4/5/02 Lafarge shall maintain records per 40 CFR63.10(b) (e.g., occurrence and duration ofstartups, malfunctions, exceedances,maintenance, corrective actions and allNESHAP required information.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5740 CFR 63.10(b)(3)4/5/02 Lafarge shall keep applicability determinationsof Subpart LLL, HAP potentials (withoutconsidering controls) with specified conditions,on site for 5 years.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5840 CFR 63.10(d)(1)4/5/02 Lafarge shall submit reports in accordance with40 CFR 63 Subpart LLL.None required N/A N/AEU 1.5940 CFR 63.10(f)4/5/02 Lafarge shall comply with recording andreporting requirements of 40 CFR 63.10, unlessa waiver is granted by the Administrator.None required N/A N/ANESHAP Specific Applicable ProvisionsRequirement Nos. EU 1.61 through 1. 66 are the specifically applicable requirements identified in Subpart LLL.EU 1.6040 CFR63.1343(d)(2)6/14/99 Dioxin/furan (D/F) shall not exceed 0.40ng/dscm (1.7x10-10gr/dscf)(TEQ) @ 7% O2when average ESP inlet temperatures is<400°Fduring D/F test.II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &Recordkeeping(3) 3-hourrunsEPA Method 23 (40CFR 60, Appendix A,July 1, 2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 36 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.6140 CFR 63.1344(a) 6/14/99 Lafarge shall operate the kiln such that thetemperature of the gas inlet to the kilnparticulate matter control device (PMCD) doesnot exceed the applicable temperature limitestablished during the performance test (40CFR 63.1349(b)).II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &Recordkeeping3-HourRollingAverageNIST CalibratedReferenceThermocouple ñPotentiometer systemEU 1.6240 CFR 63.1344(b) 6/14/99The temperature limit for affected sourcesmeeting the limits in 40 CFR 63.1344(a) isdetermined in accordance with 40 CFR63.1349(b)(3)(iv)II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &Recordkeeping3-hourrollingaverageNIST CalibratedReferenceThermocouplePotentiometerEU 1.6340 CFR 63.1349(a) 6/14/99Lafarge shall demonstrate initial compliancethrough a performance test followingrequirements in 40 CFR 63.1350(b) and 40CFR 63.7. Performance test results will bedocumented in complete test reports to includeinformation identified in paragraphs (a)(1)through (a)(10)II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &RecordkeepingNA NAPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 37 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt. No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU 1.6440 CFR63.1350(b)(3)6/14/99 Performance testing requirements for D/Flimits to include development of temperaturelimit at inlet to PMCD.II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &RecordkeepingNA NAEU 1.6540 CFR 63.1350(a) 6/14/99Lafarge shall prepare a written operations andmaintenance plan for each affected unit andsubmit it to the Administrator for review andapproval.II.A.2(j) SubpartLLL Monitoring& ComplianceProvisionsII.A.2(k)NESHAPSNotification,Reporting &RecordkeepingNA NAWAC 173-434 Solid Waste Incineration FacilitiesThese requirements apply as a result of waste fuels burned (see Conditions EU 1.10 and EU 1.12-1.15) and the SIP approved version of WAC 173-434(10/18/90). WAC 173-434 was updated (effective 1/22/04) and willexempt certain waste fuels from the applicability of this regulation. Once the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434 is incorporated into the SIP, Conditions EU1.66 of this permit (along with the terms of the complianceschedule for this condition)will be superceded and inapplicable for this permit, based on the presently approved operations at Lafarge.EU 1.66WAC 173-434 10/18/90Emission limits and operational parameterlimits for solid waste incineration facilities.V.L.2Error!Referencesource notfound.N/A N/AN/A = Not Applicable. A specificreference test method and/or emission standard period is specified in the requirement. A test method is neither needed nor appropriate.Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 38 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 20042.Emission Unit #2 (EU-2):Clinker CoolerHot clinker from the kiln feeds into theclinker cooler and cooled by counter currentair being drawn back through the kiln torecaptureheat. Excess heat, heat not returned to the kiln and excess heat from kiln pushes become discharged through cooler fans into the clinkercooler baghouses. These dust collectors consist of east and west sideswith upper and lower baghouses. The two lower dust collectors arethe main clinker cooler baghouseseach with 62500 cfm at 220 to 240°F. The two upper dust collectors are the backup baghouses eachwith 31250 cfm at 220°F each.The total exhaust (125,000 cfm) from the two main baghouses is manifolded through a single exit on the side of the clinker coolerbuilding. The total exhaust (62,500 cfm) form the two backup baghouses is manifoldedthrough a single stack on top of the clinker coolerbuilding. The lower and upper baghousesare not operated at the same time.A continuous emission monitor for opacity isinstalled on the single exhaust stack for the main baghouses exhausting out the side of theclinker cooler building. No opacity monitor is installed on the upper baghouses whichexhaust from two vertical stacks on topof theclinker building.There are also two additional stacks on the top of the clinker cooler building called the 'dump' stacks. The 'dump' stacks areused inemergencies to discharge hot kiln gases directly to the atmosphere and bypass all fourbaghouses. An emergency bypass of the dustcollectors becomes necessaryif hot kiln gases can not be cooled quick enough byeither dilution or water sprays and must be dischargedimmediately to avoid destroying the baghouses.Table 3 Emission Unit # (EU-2):Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 39 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSReqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodState & Local - OperationsEU-2.1Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.20(a)6/09/1988 Must maintain sources approved under PugetSound Clean Air Agency Reg. I, Article 6 ingood working orderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AEU-2.2RCW 70.94.152(7)(STATEONLY)1996Must maintain equipment in good workingorder.II.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AVisible EmissionsPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 40 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.3WAC 173-400-040(1)Thisrequirement will besuperseded uponadoption of the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(1)(State Only).This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-040(1)09/20/939/15/01Shall not emit more than 20% opacity formore than 3 minutes in any 1-hour periodII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)EU-2.4Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(b)(1)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.04(c)(2) upon itsadoption into theSIP.02/10/94 CEMS 20% OpacityShall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emissions of any air contaminant (asdetermined by a continuous emissionmonitoring system) that is greater than 20%opacity for a period aggregating more than 3minutes in any 1 hour.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB July 1, 1997)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 41 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.5Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.04(c)(2) (StateOnly)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacePuget Sound cleanAir Agency Reg I:9.09(b)(1) effective2/10/9404/09/98 CEMS or Visual 20% OpacityIt shall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emission of any air contaminantduring any hour that contains any consecutive6-minute period averaging greater than 20%opacity.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements6-minuteperiodEPA Method 9(40 CFR 60, AppendixA, July 1, 2001EPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB, July 1, 1997)EU-2.6Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(b)(2)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.04(c)(2) upon itsadoption into theSIP.02/10/94 CEMS 5% OpacityShall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emissions of any air contaminant (asdetermined by a continuous emissionmonitoring system) that is greater than 5%opacity for a 1-hour average.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 42 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.7Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.04(c)(1) (StateOnly)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP.When the 4/9/98version of 9.04(c)(2)is adopted into theSIP this standard of20% opacity for 6minutes in any onehour will allow botha CEM and visualEPA Method 904/09/98 CEMS or Visual 5% OpacityIt shall be unlawful for any person to cause orallow the emission of any air contaminantduring any hour that averages greater than 5%opacity.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements1-houraverageEPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB July 1, 1997)Particulate StandardsPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 43 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.8Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(a)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.09 upon itsadoption into theSIPPuget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09 (State Only)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 2/10/94 version02/10/9404/09/98Shall not emit particulate matter in excess of0.05 gr/dscf (uncorrected for excess air)II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 44 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.9WAC 173-400-060This requirementshall be supersededby the 9/15/01version of WAC173-400-060 uponits adoption into theSIPWAC 173-400-060(State Only) Thisrequirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-0603/22/919/15/01Shall not emit particulate material in excess of0.1 gr/dscf (uncorrected for excess air).II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 5(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY Orders of Approval – PM10 LimitsEU-2.10Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 5627Condition No. 5Limit PM10Emissions12/27/94 Particulate matter (PM10) emissions from thelower clinker cooler BH shall not exceed0.025 gr/dscf.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMSII.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 201A/202(40 CFR 51 AppendixM, July 1, 2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 45 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-2.11Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 5627,Condition No. 412/27/94 The lower clinker cooler baghouse and theupper clinker cooler baghouse shall not beoperated at the same time during normaloperating conditions.II.A.2(e) PM10Clinker CoolerMonitoringNA NANA = Not Applicable3.Emission Unit #3 (EU-3): [RESERVED]4.Emission Unit #4 (EU-4):Raw Material, Clinker and Finished Product Storage Bins; Finish Mill Conveying System Transfer Points, Bagging Systemand Bulk Loading/Unloading System. Thisunit also includes the general fuel system.Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 46 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Table 5 Emission Unit # (EU-4):APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSReqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodState & Local OperationsEU-4.1Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.20(a)6/09/1988 Must maintain sources approved under PugetSound Clean Air Agency Reg. I, Article 6 ingood working orderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AEU-4.2RCW 70.94.152(7)(STATEONLY)1996Must maintain and operate equipmentrequiring an NOC in good working orderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AVisible EmissionsPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 47 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-4.3Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.03This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.04 upon itsadoption into theSIP9/08/94 Shall not emit more than 20% opacity for aperiod or periods aggregating more than 3minutes in any 1-hour periodII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)EU-4.4WAC 173-400-040(1)Thisrequirement will besuperseded uponadoption of the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(1)(State Only).This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-040(1)09/20/939/15/01Shall not emit more than 20% opacity formore than 3 minutes in any 1-hour periodII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 48 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodParticulate StandardsEU-4.5Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(a)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.09 upon itsadoption into theSIPPuget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09 (State Only)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 2/10/94 version02/10/9404/09/98Particulate EmissionShall not emit particulate matter in excess of0.05 gr/dscf (uncorrected for excess air)II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 49 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-4.6WAC 173-400-060This requirementshall be supersededby the 9/15/01version of WAC173-400-060 uponits adoption into theSIPWAC 173-400-060(State Only) Thisrequirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 8/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-06008/20/939/15/01Shall not cause or permit the emission ofparticulate material in excess of 0.1 gr/dscf ofexhaust gas (uncorrected for excess air).II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 5(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)PUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY Orders of Approval – PM10 CapPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 50 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-4.7Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 5627Condition No. 6Limit PM10Emissions.12/27/94 PM10 from each baghouse shall not exceed0.005 gr/dscf 24 hr average & compliancemay be demonstrated by one of the followingmethods:a. Puget Sound CleanAir Agency approvedsource test;b. No visible emissions for 15 consecutiveseconds;c. No visible emissions for 3 consecutiveminutes; ord. Repairing baghouse with visible emissionsfor more than 3 minutes within 24 hours.Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may requiresource tests of BHs with sustained visibleemissions unless emissions are consideredunavoidable under WAC 173-400-107.II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsII.A.2(f)PM10 MonitoringSourcetest for a24 hrperiodParticulate by EPAMethod 5 or EPAMethod 201A; visibleemissions by EPAMethod 22.NA = Not ApplicablePermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 51 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 20045.Emission Unit #5 (EU-5): Cement Kiln Dust Recycle SystemThis emission unit consists of the following: The Cement Kiln Dust Recycle System consisted of a conveyors for ESP captured dust, akiln dust storage silo and a MikroPul 100 S-8 BHat 8000 cfm for recycling ESP dust back to kiln.Table 6 Emission Unit # (EU-):APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTSReqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodState & Local OperationsEU-5.1Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg I:9.20(a)6/09/1988 Must maintain sources approved under PugetSound Clean Air Agency Reg. I, Article 6 ingood working orderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AEU-5.2RCW 70.94.152(7)(STATEONLY)1996Must maintain and operate equipmentrequiring an NOC in good working orderII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/A N/AVisible EmissionsPermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 52 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-5.3Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.03This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.04 upon itsadoption into theSIP9/08/94 Visible OpacityShall not emit more than 20% opacity for aperiod or periods aggregating more than 3minutes in any 1-hour periodII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)EU-5.4WAC 173-400-040(1)Thisrequirement will besuperseded uponadoption of the9/15/01 version ofWAC 173-400-040(1)into the SIPWAC 173-400-040(1)(State Only).This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-040(1)09/20/939/15/01Visible OpacityShall not emit more than 20% opacity formore than 3 minutes in any 1-hour periodII.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsMore than3 min. inany 1 hrEcology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 53 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodParticulate StandardsEU-5.5Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09(a)This requirementshall be supersededby the 4/9/98version of Reg. I:9.09 upon itsadoption into theSIPPuget Sound CleanAir Agency Reg. I:9.09 (State Only)This requirementwill becomefederallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 2/10/94 version02/10/9404/09/98Particulate EmissionShall not emit particulate matter in excess of0.05 gr/dscf (uncorrected for excess air)II.B Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 54 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-5.6WAC 173-400-060This requirementshall be supersededby the 9/15/01version of WAC173-400-060 uponits adoption into theSIPWAC 173-400-060(State Only) Thisrequirement willbecome federallyenforceable uponadoption into theSIP and will replacethe 9/20/1993version ofWAC173-400-06009/20/939/15/01Particulate EmissionShall not cause or permit the emission ofparticulate material in excess of 0.1 gr/dscf ofexhaust gas (uncorrected for excess air).II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsAt least 1-hr per runEPA Method 5(40 CFR Part 60,Appendix A, July 1,2001)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 55 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodPUGET SOUND CLEAN AIR AGENCY Orders of Approval – PM10 CapEU-5.7Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 5627Condition No. 6Limit PM10Emissions.12/27/94 PM10 from each baghouse shall not exceed0.005 gr/dscf 24 hr average & compliancemay be demonstrated by one of the followingmethods:a. Puget Sound CleanAir Agency approvedsource test;b. No visible emissions for 15 consecutiveseconds;c. No visible emissions for 3 consecutiveminutes; ord. Repairing baghouse with visible emissionsfor more than 3 minutes within 24 hours.Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may requiresource tests of BHs with sustained visibleemissions unless emissions are consideredunavoidable under WAC 173-400-107.II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsII.A.2(f) PM10MonitoringSourcetest for a24 hrperiodParticulate by EPAMethod 5 or EPAMethod 201A; visibleemissions by EPAMethod 22.Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 56 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffectiveDateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU-5.8Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 8022Condition No. 3Limit PM10Emissions.40 CFR 60.62 (c)2/23/0010/6/75Condition #3:Shall comply with 40 CFR 60, Subpart A andSubpart F.Shall not cause to be discharged into gasesthat exhibit 10 percent opacity or greater.40 CFR 63.1356 Exemption from NSPS.II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirements6-minuteperiodEPA Method 9 (40CFR 60, Appendix A,July 1, 2001)EU-5.9Puget Sound CleanAir Agency Order ofApproval No. 8022Condition No. 4Limit PM10Emissions.2/23/00 Shall not exceed 0.005 gr/dscf from the CKDrecycle BH.II.B. Operationand Maintenance(O&M) PlanRequirementsII.A.2 (g) CementKiln Dust RecycleSystem VisibleEmissionMonitoringPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5 (SeeSection X)NA = Not Applicable

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 57 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# II. MONITORING, MAINTEN ANCE AND RECORDKEEPING

METHODS DESCRIPTION

A. Minimum Monitoring, Mainte nance Reporting & Recordkeeping Requirements

1. Facility-wide Monitoring, Ma intenance & Recordkeeping Requirements

(a) General Visual Opacity Monitoring

Lafarge shall conduct monthly inspections of the facility for visible emissions. Inspections are to be performed while the equipment is in operation during daylight hours. If, during the scheduled inspection or at any other time, vi sible emissions other than uncombined water are observed, Lafarge shall, as soon as possible, but no later than
24 hours of the initial observation, take corrective action until there are no visible emissions or, alternatively, r ecord the opacity using the re ference test method or shut down the unit or activity until it can be repaired.

[WAC 173-401-615(1), 10/17/02]

(b) Complaint Response

Lafarge shall develop and implement an Ai r Pollution Complaint Response Program as part of the O&M Plan required by Regulati on I Section 7.09(b). The Complaint Response Program shall be annually reviewed a nd updated along with the O&M plan. This Program shall include the elements described below.

(i) The Lafarge air pollution compla int response program shall include:

1) A Lafarge local contact person and a 24-hour telephone number;

2) Complaint forms available to the public;

3) Description of public comm unication procedures in response to complaints;

4) Criteria and methods for establishing wh ether Lafarge may be the source of complaints;

5) Actions for addressing compla ints and their causes; and

6) Format of communicating results of invest igations and advising complainants of Lafarge's corrective actions and preventive maintenance.

(ii) Lafarge shall record air pollution co mplaints and findings of investigations. Investigations shall be conduc ted within 3 days. Investiga tions shall include potential sources within Lafarge's facility as well as any operational activity associated with the plant operation, considering the following circumstances:

1) Emissions that are, or likely to be, injuri ous to human health, plant or animal life, or property, or which unreasonably interfer e with enjoyment of life and property;

2) Fugitive dust emissions or evidence of inad equate fugitive dust control measures;

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 58 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# 3) Evidence of fallout materials and any phys ical or chemical associations with plant-site activities;

4) Materials tracked onto paved roads open to the public;

5) Emissions of odor-bearing air contaminants;

6) Equipment operating in such a manner as can reasonably be expected to

contribute emissions that can re sult in fallout complaints;

7) Emissions due to startup, shutdown, malf unction or emergencies as defined in
WAC 173-400-107 or WAC 173-401-645;

8) Emissions caused by noncompliance with applicable requirements of this permit;

and

9) Any complaints relating to other appli cable requirements of this permit.

(iii) If Lafarge identifies its plant (or any associated operational activity) as the source contributing to air pollution complaints, La farge shall use good industrial practices to minimize emissions including shutting down an emission unit within 24 hours of identification, while following requirements of this permit, and keeping records required in Section II.A.1(f).

[WAC 173-401-615(1) and WA C 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

(c) Facility-Wide Inspections

Lafarge shall conduct a roof-top 1 

# inspection and a facility-wide inspection at least monthly. These inspections shall include ch ecking for prohibited ac tivities under Section III of the permit and activities that require additional approval under Section IV of the permit. The inspections shall also examin e the general state of compliance with the generally applicable requirements and the general eff ectiveness of the Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Plan.

Both the roof-top and facility-wide inspecti ons shall include an inspection for odorbearing contaminants and emissions of any ai r contaminant in sufficient quantities and of

such characteristics and duration as is, or is likely to be, in jurious to human health, plant or animal life, or property, or which unreason ably interfere with enjoyment of life and

property.

Whenever Lafarge engages in construction or other activities of a te mporary nature that are likely to generate fugitive dust, fallout or track-out, Lafarge shall conduct inspections each day of activity for fugitive dust and track-out.

Lafarge shall inspect the facility for the following:

1) Proper operation;

1 

# A “roof-top inspection” is an inspection of the overall facil ity from a sufficient height to allow the determination of the point(s) of origin and possibly the cause(s) of observed opacity.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 59 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# 2) Visible emissions while the emission generating equipment is operating, and

3) Evidence of fugitive dust or fallout, such as particulate matter, visible inside and

near the exit of the exhaus t duct or area of activity.

Lafarge shall begin corrective action for any problems, such as excessive corrosion or damage to production or air pollution contro l equipment or improper material handling operations, that cause or are likely to cause viol ations of any of the terms or conditions of this permit as soon as possible, but not later than within 24 working hours.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.09(b)(6), (9/10/1998)], [WAC 173-401-615(1) and WAC 173- 401-615(2)(a), 10/17/02].

(d) General Fugitive Dust

Lafarge shall conduct visual facility-wide inspect ions at least weekly for fugitive dust. If any fugitive dust is observed or if any track-out onto West Marginal Way is observed, Lafarge shall clean the area within 24 hours, and Lafarge shall employ preventive measures as described by the Op eration & Maintenance (O&M) Plan.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.15, (8/ 10/1998)], [WAC 173- 400-040(3) & (8) (11/4/93)]

(e) Maintenance and repair of insignificant emission units

Lafarge shall use good industrial practices to maintain insi gnificant emission units and equipment 2 

# not listed in this permit. For such equipment, Lafarge shall also promptly repair defective equipment. Good industrial practices may include, but are not limited to, following the manufacturerís operations manua l or an equipment operations schedule, minimizing emissions until the repairs can be completed, and taking measures to prevent recurrence of the problem.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulati on I, Section 9.20 (6/ 09/88)], [WAC 173-400- 101(4) (4/22/95)]

(f) Recordkeeping, Facility-wide General Requirements

Lafarge shall maintain the following:

1) 

# Records of required monitoring information that include the following if applicable:

a) The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurements;

b) The date(s) analyses were performed;

c) The company or entity that performed the analyses;

d) The analytical techniques or methods used;

e) The results of such analyses; and

2 

# Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regul ation I, Section 1.07(s) states, “EQUIPMENT means any stationary or port able device or any part thereof that
emits or may emit any air contam inant into the atmosphere.”

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 60 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# f) The operating conditions existing at the time of sampling or measurement.

[WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

2) 

# Records describing changes made at the source that result in emi ssions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an applicable re quirement, but not otherwise regulated under the permit, and the emissions re sulting from those changes.

[WAC 173-401-615(2)(b), 10/17/02 ]

3) 

# Records of all monitoring data and support information required by this permit shall be retained by Lafarge for a period of five years from the date of the monitoring, sample, measurement, record, or applic ation. Support information includes all

calibration and maintenance records and al l original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all repor ts required by the permit.

[WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02 ]

4) 

# Lafarge shall document all inspections, test s and other actions required by the O&M Plan and Section II.A of this permit, incl uding who conducted the inspection, tests or other actions; and the date and the results of the inspection, tests or other actions including corrective actions. All such r ecords shall be signed and dated. Lafarge shall maintain records of all inspections, tests, and other actions required by the O&M

Plan on site and available for P uget Sound Clean Air Agency review.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.09(b)(6), (9/10/1998)], [WAC 173-400-101(4) (4/22/95)]

5) 

# Records for all complaints received con cerning odor, fugitive emissions or nuisance relating to Section II of this permit must also contain the following information:

a) Date and time of the complaint,

b) Name of the person complaining, if known,

c) Nature of the complaint, and

d) Date, time and nature of any corrective action taken.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.09(b)(6), 9/10/1998], [WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

2. Specific Monitoring

(a) Opacity CEMS

i. Continuous Monitoring . Lafarge shall operate a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) for opacity for the main k iln stack and the cli nker cooler baghouse.

ii. Data Recovery . Lafarge shall recover valid hourly monitoring data for at least 95% of

the hours that the kiln and cooler are operated during eac h calendar month except for periods of monitoring system downtime, pr ovided that Lafarge demonstrates to the

Control Officer that the downtime was not a result of inadequate design, operation, or

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 61 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# maintenance, or any other reasonably preven table condition, and any necessary repairs to the monitoring system are conducted in a timely manner.

iii. Quality Assurance . Lafarge shall operate a con tinuous emission monitoring system that meets the performance sp ecification in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B in effect at the time of its installation, and Lafarge shall opera te this monitoring system in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyís ìRecommended Quality Assurance Procedures for Opacity Continuous M onitoring Systemsî (EPA 340/1-86-010).

iv. Data Recording . Monitoring data commencing on th e clock hour and containing at least 45 minutes of monitoring da ta shall be reduced to 1-hou r averages. Monitoring data for opacity shall also be reduced to 6-minut e averages. All monitoring data shall be included in these averages except for data co llected during calibrati on drift tests and for data collected subsequent to a failed quality assurance test or audit.

v. Data Retention : Lafarge shall retain all monitoring data for at least 5 years, including copies of all reports submitted to the Agency and records of all repairs, adjustments, and maintenance performed on the monitoring system.

vi. Relative Accuracy Tests . All relative accuracy tests sh all be subject to the provisions of Regulation I, Section 3.07.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regul ation I, Section 12.01 & 12.03, 4/9/98]

(b) SO 2 

# CEMS

i. Continuous Monitoring . Lafarge shall operate a continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) for SO2 for the kiln main stack.

ii. Data Recovery . Lafarge shall recover valid hourly monitoring data for at least 95% of

the hours that the kiln is operated during each calendar month except for periods of monitoring system downtime, provided that La farge demonstrates to the Control Officer

that the downtime was not a result of inade quate design, operation, or maintenance, or any other reasonably preventable condition, and any necessary repairs to the monitoring system are conducted in a timely manner.

iii. Quality Assurance . Lafarge shall operate a con tinuous emission monitoring system that meets the performance sp ecification in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B in effect at the time of its installation, and Lafarge shall opera te this monitoring system in accordance with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyís ìRecommended Quality Assurance Procedures for Opacity Continuous M onitoring Systemsî (EPA 340/1-86-010).

iv. Data Recording . Monitoring data commencing on th e clock hour and containing at least 45 minutes of monitoring data shall be reduced to 1- hour averages. All monitoring data shall be included in these averages exce pt for data collected during calibration drift tests and for data collected subsequent to a failed quality assura nce test or audit.

v. Data Retention : Lafarge shall retain all monitoring data for at least 5 years, including copies of all reports submitted to the Agency and records of all repairs, adjustments, and maintenance performed on the monitoring system.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 62 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# vi. Relative Accuracy Tests . All relative accuracy tests sh all be subject to the provisions of Regulation I, Section 3.07.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regul ation I, Section 12.01 & 12.03, 4/9/98]

(c) Tire Derived Fuel Monitoring

Lafarge shall record the daily quantity of wa ste derived fuels burned in the kiln, the Btu content of tire derived fuel and the percentage of total kiln heat in accordance with the Tire Derived Fuels Plan, which is incorporat ed with the Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan for the plant.

[Order of Approval 3374, Condition No. 5, 7/10/91]

[WAC 173-401-615(1) and WA C 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

(d) Alternate Opacity Monitoring

Lafarge shall conduct annual 1-hour particulat e source tests per Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Method 5 while collecting 1-hour CEMS opacity values on the kiln stack per Regulation I, Section 3.07 during normal operations.

Lafarge shall submit annual reports correlating 1-hour CEMS opacity values with 1-hour particulate concentrations.

Lafarge shall either:

(A) Verify the alternate opacity limit of Order of Approval No. 5183 Condition No. 4 continues to accurately indicate a violation of the particulate standard of Regulation I, Section 9.09, or;

(B) Submit a request to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to modify the alternate opacity limit in Order of Approval 51 83, Condition No. 4 following Regulation I,
Article 6, within 6 months of the annual test , with information satisfying Regulation I, Section 9.04(d)(2).

[Order of Approval No. 5183, Condition No. 5, 2/9/94]

(e) PM10 Clinker Cooler Monitoring

Lafarge shall monitor and record the daily use of the lower and upper clinker cooler baghouses to verify they are not operated at the same time during normal operating

conditions.

[WAC 173-401-615(1) and WA C 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

(f) PM10 Monitoring

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may require Lafarge to complete source tests of baghouses with sustained visible emissi ons unless Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

considers emissions to be unavoidable when Lafarge following procedures in WAC 173-

400-107.

[Order of Approval No. 5627, Condition No. 6, 12/27/94]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 63 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (g) Cement Kiln Dust Recycle System Visible Emission Monitoring

Lafarge shall monitor the CKD recycle BH fo r visible emissions, evidence of fugitive dust and fallout at least one/week while operating.

If visible emissions, fugiti ve dust or fallout are found, Lafarge shall within 24-hours
make corrections until no visible emissions, f ugitive dust or fallout occur, or shut down the equipment venting to the BH as specifi ed in an Operation and Maintenance Plan.

Lafarge shall document these corrective auctions, maintain these records on site for at least five years, and make them available to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency personnel

upon request.

[Order of Approval No. 8022, Condition No. 5, 2/23/00]

(h) Waste Derived Fuel Monitoring

(1) Monitor Used Oils Characteristics



# Lafarge shall monitor the analysis of used oil delivered for burning in the kiln as replacement fuel to verify complian ce with WAC 173-303-090 Dangerous Waste

Characteristics and WAC 173-303-515 Standards for the Management of Used Oil using the procedures in the Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan for this plant.

[WAC 173-401-615(1), 10/17/02]

[Order of Approval No. 6202, Condition No. 8, 11/15/95]

(2) Monitor Fuel Btu Content



# Lafarge shall monitor and record the daily Btu content of used oils burned in the kiln as replacement fuels and the percenta ge of total kiln heat as de termined by the procedures in the Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan for this plant.

[WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

[Order of Approval 6202, Condition No. 8, 11/15/95]

(3) Monitor Fuels Meet WAC Definitions



# Replacement fuels shall be defined in the Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan including the definitions of the following fuels:

(a) Used Oil; (b) Refined Oil Tank Bottoms; (c) Raw Crude Tank Bottoms; (d) Heavy Vacuum Gas Oil Waste; (e) O ff Specification Fuel Oil.

[Order of Approval No. 6202, Conditions 6 & 8, 11/15/95]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 64 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (4) Fuel Parameters



# Lafarge shall obtain fuel analysis documentati on for all fuel deliveries and Lafarge shall

maintain records on site.

[Order of Approval No. 6202, C ondition Nos. 7 & 8, 11/15/95]

(5) Waste Derived Fuel Usage & Monitoring Plans

(a) Yearly Update of O&M Plan



# Lafarge shall follow its approved Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan which shall be reviewed annually. Lafarge shall re quest approval (includi ng justification) for any updates to the Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan

. [Order of Approval No. 6202, Condition 8, 11/ 15/95] [WAC 173-401-615(3), 10/17/02]

(b) Yearly Report Changes in O&M Plan



# Lafarge shall annually report to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency any changes or modification to the updated Waste Deri ved Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan. [Order of Approval No. 6202, Condition 8, 11/ 15/95] [WAC 173-401-615(3), 10/17/02]

(c) Fuel Testing Procedures in O&M Plan



# Lafarge shall maintain a Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan and update it annually, including the following:

a. The monitoring and testing procedures for the waste derived fuels burned in the kiln including;

i. Type and quantity of fuel burned (i.e ., lb, gal, raw crude, heavy vacuum gas) ii. Names and address of sources and suppliers of fuels iii. Fuel parameters (i.e., Btu content, % ash, etc.); iv. Fuel testing frequency (i .e., monthly, per shipment, etc.) v. The sample and analytical testing methods (i.e., EPA or ASTM methods); vi. The analytical and sampling procedures for heat input from replacement fuel.

b. A source test plan with sampling methods , analytical procedur es and testing date for demonstrating compliance with the emi ssion standards of Regulation I, Article 9 and Order of Approval No. 5183

[Order of Approval No. 6202, Condition 8(a) & (b) 11/15/95] [WAC 173-401-615(3), 10/17/02]

(i) NESHAPS General Monitoring Lafarge shall adopt and follow an SSM plan which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 63. That plan shall be available for re view upon request by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. Recordkeeping and reporting of SSM plan provisions are described in Section II.A.2(j) of this permit. The SSM plan may be revised without modifying this permit, except as noted in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(viii).

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 65 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (j) Subpart LLL Monitoring & Compliance Provisions

(1) Performance Testing Requirements



# (a) Lafarge shall comply with emission limits of 40 CFR 63.1343(d)(2) per methods in 40 CFR 63.1349(b) and 40 CFR 63.7, and the pe rformance test report of 40 CFR 63.10 shall meet the following:

(1) A description of the process a nd the air pollution control system;

(2) Sampling location description(s);

(3) Describe sampling and analytical procedures including modifications;

(4) Test results;

(5) Quality assurance procedures and results;

(6) Operating conditions during test s, standards, and calibrations;

(7) Raw data sheets for field sampli ng and field and laboratory analyses;

(8) Documentation of calculations;

(9) All data used to establish para meters for compliance monitoring;

(10) Any other information requ ired by the test method; and

(11) This report shall be submitted within 60 days of finishing the performance

test.

(b) Lafarge shall demonstrate initial complia nce by completing a performance test on the kiln for dioxin tests per 40 CFR 60, Appendi x A, Method 23. The performance test shall

include:

(1) Three separate runs per test; withkiln operating at highest capacity level reasonably expected to occur; at least th ree hours per run, with at least 90 dscf (2.5 dscm). Compliance is determ ined by averaging the three run

concentrations.

(2) The ESP inlet temperature shall be continuously recorded during dioxin

tests.

(3) Calculate one-minute average temper atures each minute of each test run.

(4) Average, the one-minute averag e temperature during each run, and average the three average run temperat ures for the temperature limit in 40 CFR 63.1344(b).

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, 6/14/99]

(c) Lafarge shall repeat D/F Kiln testi ng every 30 months per 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3).

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 66 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (d) Lafarge shall repeat D/F kiln tests pe r 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(1) & (3), within 90 days of any significant change (as de fined in the O&M Plan) in feed or fuel from previous performance tests.

(2) O & M Plan Requirements



# (a) Lafarge shall prepare an O&M Plan for a ffected sources (as listed in O&M Plan) per 40 CFR 63.1350(a) and submit to Puget Sound Cl ean Air Agency for approval including:

(1) The O&M procedures to meet standards of 40 CFR 63.1343 through 40 CFR
63.1348;

(2) Corrective actions as re quired by 40 CFR 63.1350(e); and

(3) Annual kiln combustion system insp ections (defined in O&M Plan);

(b) Failure to comply with any provisi on of the O&M Plan per 40 CFR 63.1350(a) shall

be a violation of the standards of 40 CFR 63.1343 through 40 CFR 63.1348.

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, 6/14/99]

(3) Install & Operate Temperature Monitor



# (a) Lafarge shall operate a qua rterly calibrated continuous temperature monitor at the ESP inlet for recording 3 hour rolling average temperatures for dioxin and furan (D/F) emissions. Lafarge shall monitor D/F emissions by the following:

(1) Recorder response range shall include zero and 1.5 times either of the average temperatures establishe d per 40 CFR 63.1349(b)(3)(iv);

(2) NIST calibrated reference thermocoupl e-potentiometer system shall be the

reference method unless an alternat e method is approved by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency;

(2) The monitor shall con tinuously record the kiln inlet ESP temperature;

(3) Every 3-hour rolling average temperatur e shall be no less th an the average of 180 successive one-minute average temperatures; and

(4) If a one-minute average is unavailable it shall not be included in the rolling average, and when the first full one-minute average temperature becomes available it shall be added to the prev ious 179 successive one-minute values for the 3-hour rolling average.

(b) Lafarge shall inspect the components of the kiln combustion system once per year.

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, 6/14/99]

(4) Compliance Dates



# Lafarge shall demonstrate compliance with the provisions of 40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL by July 14, 2002 and as identified in 40 CFR 63.7.

[40 CFR 63.1351(a), 5/5/02]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 67 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (k) NESHAPS Notification, Reporting & Recordkeeping

(1) No t ification requirements



# Lafarge shall comply with the notification requirements in 40 CFR 63.9 as follows:

(1) Initial notific ations per 40 CFR 63.9(b) through (d), (may be Operating Permit application if it contains all re quired information per 40 CFR 63.9(b).

(2) Notifications of performance test per 40 CFR 63.7 and 40 CFR 63.9(e).

(3) Notification of compliance status per 40 CFR 63.9(h).

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, 6/14/99]

(2) Reporting requirements



# Lafarge shall include the following in a semiannual report following 40 CFR 63.10:

(1) Report any performance test resu lts per 40 CFR 63.10(d)(2), which requires the report to be submitted within 60 days of finishing the performance test.

(2) Semiannual reports per 40 CFR 63.10(d)(5), for startup, shutdown or malfunction (SSM) (including corrective actions), as specified in 40 CFR 63.6(e)(3) for only those incidences that occur. This report may be submitted with reports for excess emissions and CMS performance.

(3) Report within two working days (tel ephone, FAX or e-mail) of any actions
inconsistent with the SSM Plan, and s ubmit a letter within 7 working days
after the end of the event, certified by a responsible official, explaining:
circumstances of event; reasons for not following SSM Plan, and if there are any excess emissions, or if parameter monitors indicates excess emissions.

(4) Report per 40 CFR 63.10(e)(2), results of performance evaluations for the CMS per 40 CFR 63.8(e) submitted simultane ously with the performance test

results.

(5) Report per 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3), excess emissions and CMS performance report when operating parameter limits are exceeded.

(6) Report semiannually per 40 CFR 63.10(e )(3)(vi) summarizing the following:

(i) Times when ESP inlet temperature exceed the maximum limit per 40 CFR 63.1344(a) and (b);

(ii) Times when thermocouples per 40 CFR 63.1350(f)(1) are not
calibrated; and

(iv) Results of combustion system co mponent inspections per 40 CFR 63.1350(i).

(iv) Failures to comply provision of the O&M Plan per 40 CFR 63.1350(a).

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 68 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (7) Whenever the total CMS down time is ≥ 10% of the operating time per reporting period, report excess emissions and CMS or parametric monitor performance with the summary report of 40 CFR 63.1354(b)(9).

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLC, 6/14/99]

(3) Recordkeeping requirements



# (a) Lafarge shall retain files for 5 years and be available for inspectors per 40 CFR 63.10(b)(1). The files shall include: date of events, m easurements, maintenance and

corrective actions. The files may be maintained on microf ilm, computer, floppy disks, magnetic tape, or microfiche.

(b) Lafarge shall maintain records pe r 40 CFR 63.10(b)(2) & (3); including:

(1) All documentation for initial notificat ions of compliance status under 40 CFR
63.9;

(2) All records of applicability dete rmination and supporting analyses; and

(3) All records needed for waivers granted per 40 CFR 63.8(f)(6).

(c) Lafarge shall maintain all records required by 40 CFR 63.10(c) for the CEMS.

[40 CFR 63, Subpart LLL, 6/14/99]

B. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Plan Requirements

Lafargeís O&M Plan shall include proce dures specifying how Lafarge will assure continuous compliance with Puget Sound Clean Ai r Agency Regulations I, II and III. For insignificant emission units, refer to the requirements stated in Section IV.AA, Insignificant Units and Activities. The Plan shall reflect good industr ial practice. In most instances, following the manufacturerís operations manual or equipment operational schedule, minimizing emissions until the repa irs can be completed and taking measures to prevent recurrence of the problem may be considered good industrial practice. Determination of whether good industrial practice is being used will be based on available information such as monitoring re sults, opacity observ ations, review of operations and maintenance procedures, a nd inspections of the emission unit or equipment. The specific provisions of th e O&M Plan, other than those required by
Section II.A, shall not be d eemed part of this permit.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, Regul ation I, Section 7.09(b) 9/10/98]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 69 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# III. PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES

Lafarge is prohibited from conducting, causi ng, or allowing the fo llowing activities:

A. Adjustment for Atmospheric Conditions

Varying the rate of emissions of a pollutant according to atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that pollutant is prohibite d, except as directed according to air pollution episode regulations. [WAC 173-400-205, 8/20/93]

B. Open Burning

Lafarge shall not conduct open burning during any st age of an air pollution episode or period of impaired air quality and sha ll not conduct any open burning ot her than the following types:

1. Fires consisting solely of charcoal, propane, natural gas, or wood used solely for the preparation of food that comply with WAC 173-425-020(1) a nd WAC 173-425-030(21)

and

2. Fires for instruction in the methods of figh ting fires, provided that the person conducting the training fire complies with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 8.07.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Sections 8.04(a), 11/09/2000 and 8.07, 9/09/1999] [WAC 173-425-020(1), 3/13/2000; WAC 173-425-030(21), 3/13/2000; RCW 70.94.743, 1998 c68 p1 and RCW 70.94.775(2), 1995 c362 p2 Stat e/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

C. Refuse Burning

Lafarge shall not cause or allow the burning of co mbustible refuse except in a multiple chamber incinerator provided with control equipment. Lafarge shall not operate refuse burning equipment any time other than daylight hours. [Puget S ound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.05, 12/9/93]

D. Concealment

Lafarge shall not cause or allow the installation or use of any device or use of any means which, without resulting in a reduction in the total amount of air contamin ant emitted, conceals an

emission of an air contaminant which would ot herwise violate Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Article 9 or Chapter 173-400 WAC. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.13(a), 6/9/88; WAC 173-400-040(7), 8/20/93]

E. Masking

Lafarge shall not cause or allow the installati on or use of any device or use of any means designed to mask the emission of an air contaminant that causes detriment to health, safety or welfare of any person or conc eals or masks an emission of an air contaminant that would otherwise violate Regulation I, Article 9 or Chapter 173-400 WAC. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.13(b), 6/9/88; and WAC 173 -400-040(7), 8/20/93]

F. Ambient Standards

Lafarge shall not cause or allow the emission of air contaminants in sufficient quantity as to exceed any ambient air quality standard in P uget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I Section 11.01. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation I, Section 11.01(b), 4/14/94]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 70 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# G. Tampering

LaFarge shall not render inaccu rate any monitoring device or method required under Chapter 70.94 RCW, or any ordinance, resolution, regulati on, permit or order in fo rce pursuant thereto. [WAC 173-400-105(8), 8/21/98 STATE ONLY ]

H. False Statements

LaFarge shall not make any false material statemen t, representation or cert ification in any form, notice or report required under Chapter 70.94 RCW , or any ordinance, resolution, regulation, permit or order in force pursuant th ereto. [WAC 173-400-105(7), 8/21/98 STATE ONLY ]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 71 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# IV. ACTIVITIES REQUIRIN G ADDITIONAL APPROVAL

Lafarge shall file notification and obtain the necessary appr oval from Puget Sound Clean Air Agency before conducting any of the following:

A. New Source Review

Lafarge shall not construct, install, establish, or modify an air contamin ant source, except those sources that are excluded by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 6.03(b),

unless a ìNotice of Constructi on and Application for Approva lî has been filed with and approved by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 6.03, 7/12/01] [WAC 173-460-040 Stat e/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

B. Replacement or Substantial Altera tion of Emission Control Technology

Lafarge shall file a Notice of Construction a nd Application for Approva l according to WAC 173- 400-114 with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency befo re replacing or substa ntially altering any emission control technology installed at the faci lity. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 6.03, 7/12/01] [WAC 1 73-400-114, RCW 70.94.153, 1991 c 199p303 State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

C. Asbestos

1. Lafarge shall comply with 40 CFR 61.145 and 61.150 when conducting

renovation or demolition activities at th e facility. [40 CFR 61.145, 4/7/1993 and 61.150, 1/16/1991]

2. Lafarge shall comply with Puget S ound Clean Air Agency Regulation III, Article 4 when conducting any asbestos project, renovation, or demolition

activities at the facil ity. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation III, Article 4, 7/13/00]

D. Spray Coating

1. Lafarge shall obtain prior approval under Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.16(a) for cau sing or allowing the use of spray equipment to apply any VOC-containing material except for:

a. The use of hand-held aerosol cans,

b. Touch-up operations,

c. The coating of marine vessels in dry docks,

d. The coating of bridges, water towers , buildings or similar structures,

e. Insecticide, pesticide, or fe rtilizer spray equipment, and

f. The coating of items that cannot be reasonably handled in an enclosed spray area, provided that the operation has received the prior written approval of the Control Officer.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation I, Section 9.16, 6/13/91]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 72 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (a) Exemptions. The following activities are exempt from the provisions of Sections 9.16(c) and (d) of this regul ation. Persons claiming any of the following spraycoating exemptions shall have the burde n of demonstrating compliance with the claimed exemption.

(1) Application of architectural or maintenance coatings to stationary structures (e.g., bridges, water towe rs, buildings, stationary machinery, or similar structures);

(2) Aerospace coating operations subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GG.

This includes all activities and ma terials listed in 40 CFR 63.741(f);

(3) Use of high-volume, low-pressure (HVLP) spray guns when:

(a) Spray-coating operations do not involve motor vehicles or motor vehicle components;

(b) The gun cup capacity is 8 fluid ounces or less;

(c) The spray gun is used to spray-co at less than 9 square feet per day per facility;

(d) Coatings are purchased in cont ainers of 1 quart or less; and

(e) Spray-coating is allowed by fire department, fire marshal, or other government agency requirements.

(4) Use of air-brush spray equipment with 0.5 to 2.0 cfm airflow and a maximum cup capacity of 2 fluid ounces;

(5) Use of hand-held aerosol spray cans with a capacity of 1 quart or less; or

(6) Indoor application of automotive undercoating materials using organic
solvents having a flash point in excess of 100 ° F.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 73 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (b) General Requirements for Indoor Spray-Coating Operations. It shall be unlawful for any person subjec t to the provisions of this section to cause or allow spray-coating inside a structure, or spra y-coating of any moto r vehicles or motor vehicle components, unless the spray-coati ng is conducted inside an enclosed spray area. The enclosed spray ar ea shall employ either properly seated paint arrestors,

or water-wash curtains with a continuous water curtain to control the overspray. All emissions from the spray-coating opera tion shall be vented to the atmosphere through an unobstructed ve rtical exhaust vent.

(c) General Requirements for Outdoor Spray-Coating Operations. After January 1, 2000, it shall be unlawful for any person subjec t to the provisions of this section to cause or allow spray-coating outside an enclosed structure unless such spraycoating operations are approved in a no tice of construction permit issued in

accordance with Article 6 of this regulation. The following minimum requirements for outdoor spray-coating operations will be included in all such notice of construction permits:

(1) Reasonable methods to confine overspray to the property where the spray-coating is being conducted shall be used (e.g., tarps, shrink wrap, mobile enclosure, or similar methods for control of overspray); and

(2) High-transfer efficiency spray equipmen t that minimizes overspray shall be used (e.g., HVLP, low-volume, low-pressure (LVL P), electrostatic, or air-assisted airless). Airless spray equipment may be used where low viscosity and high solid coatings preclude the use of higher-tr ansfer efficiency spray equipment.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 9.16, 7/12/01, State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only; however, will become federally enforceable when EPA incorporates it into the SIP]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 74 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# V. STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS

A. Duty to comply

Lafarge shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of Chapter 70.94 RCW and, for federally enforceable provisions, a violation of the Federal Clean Air Act (F CAA). Such violations are grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, re vocation and re-issuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal app lication. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.05, 10/28/ 93, WAC 173-401-620(2)(a), 11/4/93]

B. Permit actions

This permit may be modified, revoked, reopened and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by Lafarge for a pe rmit modification, revoca tion and re-issuance, or termination, or of a notification of pla nned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(c), 11/4/93]

C. Property rights

This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(d), 11/4/93]

D. Duty to provide information

Lafarge shall furnish to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, within a reasonable time, any information that the Puget Sound Clean Air Ag ency may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking an d reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. U pon request, Lafarge shall also furnish to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency copies of record s required to be kept by the permit or, for information claimed to be confidential, Lafarg e may furnish such records directly to EPA Region 10 along with a claim of confidenti ality. The Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

shall maintain the confiden tiality of such informa tion in accordance with RCW 70.94.205. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(e), 11/4/93]

E. Permit fees

Lafarge shall pay fees as a condition of th is permit in accordance with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Article 7. Fail ure to pay fees in a timely fashion shall subject Lafarge to civil and criminal penalt ies as prescribed in Chapter 70.94 RCW. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(f), 11/4/93]

F. Emissions trading

No permit revision shall be required, under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading, and other similar programs or processes for changes that are provided for in this permit. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(g), 11/4/93]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 75 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# G. Severability

If any provision of this permit is held to be invalid, all unaffected pr ovisions of the permit

shall remain in effect and be enforc eable. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(h), 11/4/93]

H. Permit appeals

This permit or any condition in it may be a ppealed only by filing an appeal with the Pollution Control Hearings Board and serv ing it on the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency within thirty days of receipt, pursuant to RCW 43.21B.310 and WAC 173-401-735. The provision for appeal in this section is separate from and additional to any federal rights to petition and review found under ß505(b) of the FCAA. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(i) and WAC 173-401-735, 11/4/93]

I. Permit continuation

This permit and all terms and conditions c ontained therein, including any permit shield provided under WAC 173-401-640, shall not e xpire until the renewal permit has been issued or denied if a timely and complete application has been submitted. An application shield granted under WAC 173-401-705(2) shall remain in effect until the renewal permit has been issued or denied if a timely and co mplete permit application has been submitted. [WAC 173-401-620(2)(j), 11/4/93]

J. Federal enforceability

All terms and conditions of this permit are enforceable by the EPA administrator and by citizens under the FCAA, except for those te rms and conditions designated in the permit as not federally enforceable. [WAC 173-401-625, 11/4/93]

K. Inspection and entry

Upon presentation of credentials and other doc uments as may be required by law, Lafarge shall allow the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or an authorized representative to:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 76 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# 1. Enter Lafarge's premises or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;

2. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit;

3. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities , equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices or operations regulate d or required under the permit; and

4. As authorized by WAC 173-400-105 and the FCAA, sample or monitor at reasonable times substances or paramete rs for the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit or appli cable requirements. [W AC 173-401-630(2) 11/4/93] [RCW 70.94.200 State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

L. Compliance requirements

1. General Compliance Requirements

Lafarge shall continue to comply with all ap plicable requirements with which the source is currently in compliance. Lafarge shall meet on a timely basis any applicable requirements that become effective du ring the permit term. [WAC 173-401-630(3), WAC 173-401-510(2)(h)(iii) 11/4/93]

2. Lafarge North America, Inc. (Seattle) Compliance Schedule,
(effective date is the issued date of the modified permit)

1. Background

Solid waste fuel firing was originally approved at Lafarge in Notice of Construction Orders of Approval No. 3374 (7/10/91), which approved tire derived fuel; and No. 6202 (11/15/95), which appr oved waste oil derived streams. Subsequent to the publication of the draf t air operating permit for Lafarge, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency has dete rmined that WAC 173-434 (effective date 10/18/90) applies to the Lafarge plant in Seattle because it is defined as a solid waste incinerator facility that began bur ning more than 12 tons of fuel after January 1, 1985. This regul ation is the SIP approved version. A revised WAC 173-434 (effective date 1/22/04) changes the definition of solid waste which will change the applicability of this regulation to Lafarge. Once EPA approves the revised WAC 173-434 as part of the SIP, the historically approved waste fuels

will not be classified as solid waste a nd this regulation will no longer apply to Lafarge. Based on this determination, the Agency has included WAC 173-434 as an applicable requirement.

WAC 173-434-130(3) re quires that SO 2 

# emissions shall not exceed 50 ppmv (at

7% O 2 

# ); or demonstrate 80 percent SO 2 

# emission reduction of uncontrolled emissions; or when more than 50 percent of the heat input is fossil fuel, a higher

SO 2 

# emission limit may be established thr ough a best available control technology

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 77 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (BACT) determination. WAC 173-434-160(6) requires that the inlet temperature of the primary particulate control de vice shall not exceed 350 degrees F.

Lafarge is currently not in compliance with WAC 173- 434-130(3) because its SO 2 

# emission level is greater than 50 ppmv; it does not use SO 2 

# emission control technology to support an emission reducti on demonstration; and while its heat input is greater than 50% from fossil fu el, there is no historical permit review which establishes Lafargeís current SO 2 

# emission levels as BACT. In addition, Lafarge is not in compliance with WA C 173-434-160(6), because the electrostatic precipitator (primary particulate contro l device) temperature typically exceeds 350 degrees F.

WAC 173-401-510(2)(h)(iii)(C) and WAC 173- 401-630(3) require each operating permit to contain a compliance schedule for those applicable requirements the source is not in compliance with at the time of permit issuance. The only way Lafarge can comply with WAC 173-434-130( 3) and 173-434-160(6) is to reduce

the amount of solid waste burned to less than 12 tons per day. Therefore, a compliance schedule to reduce the amount of solid waste burned to less than 12 tons per day must be included in this Operating Permit.

2. Compliance Schedule

Pursuant to WAC 173-401- 630(3), Lafarge is hereby ORDERED to take the following actions to come into complia nce with the provisions of WAC 173-434- 130(3) and WAC 173-434-160(6) in accordan ce with the following schedule:

A. No later than September 10, 2005, Lafa rge shall achieve compliance with WAC 173-434-130(3) and WAC 173-434-160( 6) by reducing the amount of

solid waste burned to le ss than 12 tons per day.

B. Lafarge shall not burn solid waste fuel s approved in Order of Approval No. 6202 (11/15/95) with ash content greater than 15% (by weight, daily average) after September 15, 2004.

C. Lafarge shall not burn tire derived fuel s approved in Order of Approval No. 3374 (7/10/91) at rates great er than 12 or more tons per day after September
15, 2004.

D. On or before September 1, 2004, Lafa rge shall submit an updated Waste Derived Fuel Usage and Monitoring Plan to document compliance with Paragraph 2A, 2B, and 2C of this compliance schedule.

E. Lafarge shall comply with the m onitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements from WAC 173-434 (effective date 10/18/90), as specified in Appendix F of this permit.

F. Lafarge shall communicate with EPA on a monthly basis to encourage timely processing of the SIP amendment re lated to WAC 173-434 and review progress to date regarding completion a nd publication in the Federal Register.

G. Lafarge shall submit quarterly progress reports to the Agency, certified in

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 78 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# accordance with WAC 173-401-520, rega rding progress towards achieving compliance with the terms of this compliance schedule. Progress reports are due on the last day of each calendar quarter.

H. All elements of this compliance schedule shall be enforceable terms and conditions of this operating permit.

I. Lafarge shall submit deviation reports as required by Section V.Q.1 (General Reporting) for failure to comply with the provisions of this compliance

schedule.

J. This compliance schedule shall be comple tely satisfied and no longer in effect once EPA approves the revised WAC 173- 434 (effective date 1/22/04) into the Washington SIP. With that SIP approval, WAC 173-434 will no longer be an applicable requirement for the current Lafarge operations.

3. Effective Date

This Compliance Schedule is effective as of the date signed below.

Dated this ________________ day of __________________________, 2004.

__________________
James Nolan Director Compliance Puget Sound Clean Air Agency

M. Compliance certifications

Lafarge shall submit a certifi cation of compliance with permit terms and conditions once per year. The first such certification sha ll cover a one-year period commencing upon the date of issuance of this permit. Each certification shall include:

1. The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the
certification;

2. The compliance status;

3. Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent; and

4. The method(s) used for determining the co mpliance status of th e source, currently and over the reporting period. These methods must be consistent with the permit Monitoring, Maintenance and Recordkeeping Methods.

All compliance certifications shall be submitted to EPA Region 10 and to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency, at the following addresses, within 30 days after the close of the period covered by the certification:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 79 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Puget Sound Clean Air Agency EPA Region 10, Mail Stop OAQ-107 Attn.: Operating Permit Certification Attn.: Air Operating Permits
110 Union Street, Suite 500 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Seattle, Washington 98101

[WAC 173-401-630(5) 11/4/93]

N. Compliance determination

1. General Emission Testing

i) For the purpose of determining compliance with an emission standard, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or Ecology may conduct testing of an emission unit or require Lafarge to have it tested. In the event Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or Ecology conducts the test, Lafarge shall be given an opportunity to observe the sampling and to obtain a sample at the same time. [Puget Sound Clean Air Ag ency Regulation I, Section 3.05(b), 2/10/94; WAC 173-400-105(4), 8/20/ 93, 10/23/98 State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

ii) Testing of sources for compliance with emissions standards shall be performed in accordance with the Refe rence Test Methods identified in Section I of this permit, except where this permit indicates that a specific

Reference Test Method is not needed or appropriate. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 3.07(a), 2/9/95]

iii) Lafarge shall notify Puget Sound Clean Air Agency in writing at least 2 weeks (14 days) prior to any complia nce test and provide Puget Sound Clean Air Agency an opportunity to re view the test plan and to observe the test. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agen cy Regulation I, Section 3.07(b), 2/9/95]

iv) Unless otherwise specified, each test fo r pollutants other than opacity shall consist of three separate runs and compliance shall be determined from the arithmetic average of the three runs. In the event that a sample is accidentally lost or conditions occur in which one of the runs must be discontinued because of circumstances beyond the operatorís control, compliance may, upon the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency approval, be determined from the arithmetic averag e of the two other runs. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulatio n I, Section 3.07(a), 2/9/95]

v) If required by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to perform a compliance test, Lafarge, shall submit a report to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency no later than 60 days after the test. The report shall include:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 80 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (a) A description of the source and the sampling location;

(b) The time and date of the test;

(c) A summary of results, reported in units and for averaging periods consistent with the applicable emission standard;

(d) A description of the test methods and quality assurance procedures employed;

(e) The amount of fuel burned and raw material processed by the source during the test;

(f) The operating parameters of the source and control equipment during
the test;

(g) Field data and example calculations; and

(h) A statement signed by the senior ma nagement official of the testing firm certifying the validity of the source test report.

[WAC 173-400-105(4), 10/14/96 State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only; and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation I, Section 3.07, 2/9/95]

2. Credible Evidence

For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not a person has violated or is in violation of this permit, nothing shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with ap plicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test or proce dure had been performed. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 3.0 6; 10/08/98; 40 CFR 51.212, 40 CFR 52.12, 40 CFR 52.33]

O. Recordkeeping

Lafarge shall maintain the following:

1. Records of required monitoring inform ation that include the following if applicable:

i) The date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or

measurements;

ii) The date(s) analyses were performed;

iii) The company or entity that performed the analyses;

iv) The analytical techniques or methods used;

v) The results of such analyses; and

vi) The operating conditions existing at the time of sampling or measurement.

[WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 81 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# 2. Records describing changes made at the s ource that result in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subj ect to an applicable requi rement, but not otherwise regulated under the permit, and the emi ssions resulting from those changes. [WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

3. Records of all monitoring data and s upport information required by this permit shall be retained by Lafarge for a period of five years from the date of the monitoring, sample, measurement, record or application. Support information

includes all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring inst rumentation, and copi es of all reports required by the permit. [WAC 173-401-615(2), 10/17/02]

4. Lafarge shall document all inspections, tests and other actions required by the O&M Plan and Section II.A of this permit, including who conducted the inspection, tests or other actions; and the date and the results of the inspection, tests or other actions including correctiv e actions. All such records shall be signed and dated. Lafarge shall maintain records of all inspections, tests, and other actions required by the O&M Plan on site and available for Puget Sound Clean Air Agency review. [Puget Sound Cl ean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.09(b), 9/10/98]

5. Records for all complaints received concerning odor, fugitive emissions or nuisance relating to Section II of this permit must also contain the following

information:

i) The date and time of the complaint,

ii) The name of the person complaining, if known,

iii) The nature of the complaint, and

iv) The date, time, and nature of any corrective action taken.

[WAC 173-401-615(2)(b), 10/1702]

P. Data recovery

1. General

The specific monitoring and recordkeeping requ irements identified in Section II of this permit contain data recovery requirements. Ho wever, if such requirements are silent on data recovery provisions, data r ecovery is assumed to be 100%.

[WAC 173-401-615(1)(b), 10/17/02]

2. [Reserved]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 82 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Q. Reporting

1. General Reporting

1. Any monitoring reports required by this permit to be submitted to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency shall be submitted at least once every six months, or more frequently where required by an applicab le requirement, and received at Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or postmarked no la ter than 30 days af ter the end of the six-month reporting period. The first required monitoring report shall be submitted by January 30, 2002 and cover the period from date of issuance of this permit until December 31, 2001. All instances of deviations from permit requirements must be clearly identified in such reports. If th ere were no instances of deviations, the report must state that there were no instances of deviations. All required reports must be certified by a re sponsible official consistent with WAC 173-401-520. Where an applicable re quirement requires reporting more frequently than once every six months, th e responsible officialís certification needs to only be submitted once every six months, covering all required reporting
since the date of the last certification, provided that the certification specifically identifies all documents subject to th e certification. [WAC 173-401-615(3)(a), 10/17/02]

2. Lafarge shall report in writing to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Operating

Permit Certification all instances of de viations from the permit requirements, including those attributable to upset conditions as de fined in this permit, the probable cause of the deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. Lafarge shall mainta in a contemporaneous record of all deviations. Lafarge shall report any devi ations to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Operating Permit Certification that represen t a potential threat to human health or safety by FAX (206-343-7522) as soon as po ssible but no later th an 12 hours after such a deviation is discovered. Lafarge sh all report other deviations in writing to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Operating Permit Certificatio n no later than 30 days after the end of the month during which the deviat ion is discovered. [WAC 173-401-615(3)(b), 10/17/02]

3. Any application form, report, or compliance certification submitted pursuant to this permit shall contain certification by a responsible official of truth, accuracy, and completeness. This certification a nd any other certifica tion required under this permit shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete. [WAC 173-401-520, 11/4/93]

2. Opacity and SO 2 

# CEMS Reporting

Lafarge shall submit a monthly report to Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Operating Permit Certification within 30 days after the end of the month in which the data were

recorded. This re port shall include:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 83 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# (i) The date, time period, magnitude (in the units of the standard) and cause of each emission that exceeded an applicable emission standard;

(ii) The date and time of all actions ta ken to correct the problem, including any actions taken to minimize the emissions during period when excess emissions occur and any actions taken to prevent its recurrence;

(iii) The number of hours that the equipm ent (required to be monitored) operated each month and the number of valid hours of monitoring data that the monitoring system recovered each month;

(iv) The date, time period, and cause of each failure to meet the data recovery requirements of Regulation I, Secti on 12.03(b), and any actions taken to ensure adequate colle ction of such data;

(v) The date, time period, and cause of each failure to recover valid hourly monitoring data for at least 90% of th e hours that the equi pment (required to be monitored) was operated each day;

(vi) The results of audits conducted during the month; and

(vii) A certification of truth, accuracy, a nd completeness signed by an authorized representative of th e owner or operator.

[Regulation I, Sec tion 12.03(f), 4/9/98]

3. TDF/Waste Derived Fuel Summary Report

Lafarge shall submit a summary report documen ting compliance with the requirements of EU 1.10 and EU 1.12 through EU 1.15 of this permit. The report shall summarize all monitoring and analysis information for the reporting period used to demonstrate compliance. The report shall be submitted with in 30 days after the end of the month in

which the data was recorded.

R. Emission reporting

Lafarge shall report annually to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for those air contaminants during the previous calendar year that equal or exceed the following (tons per year):

Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions 25

Facility combined total of all toxic air contaminants (TAC) emissions 6

Any single toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions 2

Nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions 25

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 84 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Particulate matter (PM10) emissions 25

Particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions 25

Sulfur oxide (SOx) emissions 25

Volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions 25

Annual emissions rates shall be reported to the nearest whole ton per year for only those contaminants that equal or exceed the thre sholds above. Lafarg e shall submit to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency any additi onal information required by WAC 173-400- 105(1) or Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation III, Section 1.11. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Section 7.09(a), 9/10/98]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 85 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# S. Emergencies

An emergency, as defined in WAC 173-401-645(l) , constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with a technology-based emissi on limitation if the conditions of WAC 173-401-645(3) are met.

The affirmative defense of emergency sha ll be demonstrated through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that:

1. An emergency occurred and that Lafa rge can identify the cause(s) of the

emergency;

2. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated;

3. During the period of the emergency Lafarge took all reasonable steps to minimize

levels of emissions that exceeded the em ission standards or other requirements in the permit; and

4. Lafarge submitted notice of the emergenc y to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency within two (2) working days of the ti me when the emissions limitations were exceeded due to the emergency or shorter periods of time specified in an applicable requirement. This notice fulfills the requirement of WAC 173-401- 615(3)(b) unless the exce ss emissions represent a potenti al threat to human health or safety. This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and corrective actions taken.

In any enforcement proceeding, Lafarge has the burden of proof to establish the occurrence of an emergency. This provision is in addition to any emergency or upset provision contained in any applicable requirement. [WAC 173-401-645, 11/4/93]

T. Unavoidable excess emissions

Excess emissions due to startup or shutdown conditions, scheduled maintenance or upsets

that are determined to be unavoidable unde r the procedures and criteria in WAC 173-

400-107 shall be excused and not subject to penalty. For any excess emission that Lafarge wants the Puget Sound Clean Air Agen cy to consider unavoidable and excusable under WAC 173-400-107, Lafarge shall subm it the information required under WAC 173-400-107. [WAC 173-400-107(2), 8/20/93 State/Puget Sound Clean Air Agency only]

U. Need to halt or re duce activity not a defense

It shall not be a defense for Lafarge in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. [W AC 173-401-620(2)(b), 11/4/93]

V. Stratospheric ozone and climate protection

1. Lafarge shall comply with the followin g standards for recycling and emissions reduction pursuant to 40 CFR Part 82, Subpa rt F, except as provided for motor vehicle air conditioners (MVACs) in Subpart B:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 86 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# i) Persons opening appliances for maintena nce, service, repair, or disposal must comply with the required practi ces pursuant to 40 CFR 82.156;

ii) Equipment used during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must comply with the standards for recycling and recovery equipment pursuant to 40 CFR 82.158;

iii) Persons performing mainte nance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must be certified by an approved tech nician certification program pursuant to

40 CFR 82.161.

2. Lafarge may switch from any ozone-depleting substance to any alternative approved pursuant to the Significant Ne w Alternatives Progr am (SNAP), 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart G, without a permit revision but sha ll not switch to a substitute listed as unacceptable pursuant to such program. [40 CFR 82.174]

3. Any certified technician employed by Lafarge shall keep a copy of their certification at their place of employment. [40 CFR 82.166(1)]

4. Lafarge shall not willfully release any regul ated refrigerant and shall use refrigerant extraction equipment to recover regulated refrigerant when servicing, repairing or disposing of commercial air conditioning, hea ting, or refrigeration systems. [RCW 70.94.970(2) and (4), 11/12/ 97 State/Puget Sound Cl ean Air Agency only]

W. RACT satisfied

Emission standards and other requirements cont ained in rules or re gulatory orders in effect at the time of this permit issuance sh all be considered RACT for the purposes of issuing this permit. [WAC 173-401- 605(3), 11/4/93; WA C 173-400-040, 9/20/93, 12/23/00 State Only]

X. Risk management programs

In accordance with 40 CFR part 68, if Lafarge has or receives more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in a process, as determined under 40 CFR 68.115, Lafarge shall comply with the requiremen ts of the Chemical Accident Prevention

Provisions of 40 CFR Part 68 no la ter than the following dates:

Three years after the date on which a regul ated substance is first listed under 40 CFR 68.130, or the date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in a process.

Y. Definitions

Unless otherwise defined in this permit, the terms used in th is permit shall have the same meaning ascribed to them in the referen ced regulation. [WAC 173-401-200, 10/17/02]

Z. Duty to supplement or correct application

Upon becoming aware that it has failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application

or that it has submitted incorrect informa tion in a permit application, Lafarge shall promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected informati on to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. [WAC 173-401-500(6), 10/17/02]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 87 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# AA. Insignificant emission units and activities

1. Insignificant emission units and activities at Lafarge are subject to all applicable requirements set forth in Sections I.A, III and IV. This permit shall not require testing, monitoring, reporting or recordkeep ing for insignificant emission units or activities except as requir ed by Puget Sound Clean Ai r Agency Regulation I, Sections 7.09(b) and 9.20. Compliance with Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Sections 7.09(b) and 9.20 shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of WAC 1 73-401-615 and 173-401-630(1).

[WAC 173-401-530(2)(c), 10/17/02]

2. Where this permit does not require te sting, monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting for insignificant emissions units or activities, Lafarge may certify continuous compliance if there were no observed, documented, or known instances of noncompliance during the reporting period. Where this permit requires testing, monitoring, recordkeep ing and reporting for insignificant emission units or activities, Lafarge ma y certify continuous compliance when the testing, monitoring, and recordkeeping required by the permit revealed no violations during the period, and there were no observed, documented, or known instances of noncompliance during the reporting period.

[WAC 173-401-530(2)(d), 10/17/02]

3. An emission unit or activity that qualifies as insignificant solely on the basis of WAC 173-401-530(1)(a) shall not exceed the emission thresholds specified in WAC 173-401-530(4) until this permit is m odified pursuant to Section VI.E of this permit and WAC 173-401-725.

[WAC 173-401-530(6), 10/17/02]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 88 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# VI. PERMIT ACTIONS

A. Permit Renewal, Revocation and Expiration

1) Renewal application . Lafarge shall submit a complete permit renewal application to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency no later than 12 mont hs prior to the expiration of this permit. Puget Sound Clean Air Agency will send Lafarg e a renewal application no later than 18 months prior to the expiration of this permit. Failure of the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to send Lafarge a renewal application shall not relieve Lafarge from the obligation to file a timely and complete renewal applicati on. [WAC 173-401-710(1) , WAC 173-401-500(2), 10/17/02]

2) Expired permits . Permit expiration terminates Lafarg e's right to operate unless a timely and complete renewal application has been submitted consistent with WAC 173-401-710(1)

and WAC 173-401-500. All terms and conditions of the permit shall remain in effect after this permit expires if a timely and complete permit application has been submitted. [WAC 173-401-710(3), 10/17/02]

3) Revocation of permits . Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may revoke a permit only upon the request of Lafarge or for cause. Puget Sound Cl ean Air Agency shall provide at least thirty days written notice to Lafarge prior to revocatio n of the permit or denial of a permit renewal application. Such notice shall include an e xplanation of the basis for the proposed action and afford Lafarge an opportunity to meet w ith the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency prior to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agencyís final d ecision. A revocation issued under this condition may be issued conditionally with a futu re effective date and may specify that the revocation will not take effect if Lafarge satisfies the specified conditions before the effective date. Nothing in this subsection shall limit the Puget S ound Clean Air Agency's authority to issue emergency orde rs. [WAC 173- 401-710(4), 10/17/02]

B. Administrative Permit Amendments

1) Definition. An "administrative permit amendment" is a permit revision that:

a) Corrects typographical errors;

b) Identifies a change in the name, address, or phone number of any person identified in the permit, or provides a similar minor administrative change at Lafarge;

c) Requires more frequent mon itoring or reporting by Lafarge;

d) Allows for a change in ow nership or operational control of a source where the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency determines that no other change in the permit is necessary, provided that a written agreem ent containing a specific da te for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability betw een the current and new permittee has been submitted to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency;

e) Incorporates into the permit the terms, conditions, and provisions from orders approving notice of construction applic ations processed under an EPA-approved program, provided that such a program meets procedural requi rements substantially equivalent to the requirements of WAC 173-401-700, 173-40 1-725, and 173-401-800 that would be applicable to the change if it were subj ect to review as a permit modification, and

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 89 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# compliance requirements substantially equi valent to those c ontained in WAC 173-401- 600 through 173-401-650. [WAC 173-401-720(1), 11/4/93]

2) Administrative permit amendment procedures . An administrative permit amendment may be made by the Puget Sound Clean Air Ag ency consistent with the following:

a) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency shall take no more than sixty days from receipt of a request for an administrative permit amendment to take final action on such request, and may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or affected states provided that it designates any such permit re visions as having been made pursuant to this paragraph.

b) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency shall subm it a copy of the revised permit to EPA.

c) Lafarge may implement the changes addressed in the request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request. [WAC 173-401-720(3), 11/4/93]

3) Permit shield . Puget Sound Clean Air Agency shall, upon taking final action granting a request for an administrative permit amendment, allow coverage by the permit shield in WAC 173-401-640 for administrative permit amendm ents made pursuant to Part (1)(e) of this condition. [WAC 173-401-720(4), 11/4/93]

C. Changes not Requi ring Permit Revisions

1) General

. a) Lafarge is authorized to make the change s described in this s ection without a permit revision, providing the following conditions are met:

i) The proposed changes are not Title I modifications as defined in WAC 173-401-
200;

ii) The proposed changes do not result in emissions which exceed those allowable under the permit, whether expressed as a ra te of emissions, or in total emissions;

iii) The proposed changes do not alter permit terms that are necessary to enforce limitations on emissions from units covered by the permit; and

iv) Lafarge provides EPA and the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency with written notification at least seven days prior to making the proposed changes except that

written notification of a cha nge made in response to an emergency shall be provided as soon as possible after the event.

b) Permit attachments. Lafarge and the Puge t Sound Clean Air Agency shall attach each notice to their copy of the relevant permit.

2) Section 502 (b)(10) changes . Pursuant to the conditions in Subsection (1) of this section, Lafarge is authorized to make Section 502( b)(10) changes (as defined in WAC 173-401- 200) without a permit revision.

a) For each such change, the written notific ation required under Subsection (1)(a)(iv) of this condition shall include a brief descripti on of the change within the permitted facility,

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 90 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# the date on which the change will occur, an y change in emissions, and any permit term or condition that is no longer applic able as a result of the change.

b) The permit shield authorized under WAC 173-401-640 shall not apply to any change made pursuant to this paragraph.

3) SIP authorized emissions trading. Pursuant to the conditions in Subsection (1) of this condition, Lafarge is authorized to trade in creases and decreases in emissions in the permitted facility, where the Washington state implementation plan provides for such emissions trades without requi ring a permit revision. This pr ovision is available in those cases where the permit does not already provide for such emissions trading.

a) Under this Subsection (3), the written notification required unde r Subsection (1)(a)(iv)

of this condition shall include such informa tion as may be require d by the provision in the Washington state implementation plan authorizing the emissions trade, including at a minimum, when the proposed change will occu r, a description of each such change, any change in emissions, the permit requirements with which Lafarge will comply using the emissions trading provisions of the Wash ington state implementation plan, and the pollutants emitted subject to the emissions tr ade. The notice shall also refer to the provisions with which Lafarge will comply in the applicable implementation plan and that provide for the emissions trade.

b) The permit shield described in WAC 173-401-640 shall not extend to any change made under this paragraph. Compliance with the pe rmit requirements that Lafarge will meet using the emissions trade shall be determ ined according to requirements of the applicable implementation plan auth orizing the emissions trade.

[WAC 173-401-722, 10/17/02]

D. Off Permit Changes

1) Lafarge shall be allowed to make changes not specifically addresse d or prohibited by the permit terms and conditions without requiring a permit revision, provided that the proposed changes do not weaken the enfor ceability of existing permit condi tions. Any change that is

a Title I modification or is a ch ange subject to the acid rain requirements under Title IV of the FCAA must be submitted as a permit revision.

2) Each such change shall meet all applicable requirements and shall not violate any existing permit term or condition.

3) Lafarge must provide contemporaneous written notice to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency and EPA of each such change, except for chan ges that qualify as insignificant under WAC 173-401-530. Such written notice shall describe each such change, including the date, any change in emissions, pollutants emitted, and any applicable requirement that would apply as a result of the change.

4) The change shall not qualify for th e permit shield under WAC 173-401-640.

5) Lafarge shall keep a record describing changes made at Lafarge that result in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an appli cable requirement, but not otherwise regulated under the permit, and the emissions resulting from those changes.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 91 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# 6) When making a change under this section, Lafarge shall comply with applicable preconstruction review requirements esta blished pursuant to RCW 70.94.152 and Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I, Article 6. [WAC 173-401-724, 11/4/93]

E. Permit Modification

1) Definition . A permit modification is any revi sion to this permit that cannot be accomplished under provisions for administrative permit amendments under WAC 173-401-

720.

2) Procedures . Minor permit modifi cation procedures.

a) Criteria.

i) Minor permit modification procedures shal l be used for those permit modifications

that:

a) Do not violate any applicable requirement;

b) Do not involve significant changes to existing monitoring, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements in the permit;

c) Do not require or change a case-by-case determination of an emission limitation
or other standard, or a s ource-specific determination for temporary sources of ambient impacts, or a visibility or increment analysis;

d) Do not seek to establish or change a permit term or condition for which there is no corresponding underlying applicable requirement and that Lafarge has assumed to avoid an applicable requir ement to which Lafarge would otherwise be subject. Such terms and conditions include:

(1) A federally enforceable emissions ca p assumed to avoid classification as a modification under any provision of Title I of the FCAA; and

(2) An alternative emissions limit approved pursuant to regulations promulgated under section 112(i)(5) of the FCAA;

e) Are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the FCAA;

ii) Notwithstanding (a)(i) of this subsecti on, and Subsection (3) of this section, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may allow the use of minor permit modification procedures for permit modifications invol ving the use of economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading, and other similar approaches, to the extent that the use of such minor permit modificat ion procedures is e xplicitly provided for in the Washington state implementation plan or in applicable requirements promulgated by EPA and in effect on April 7, 1993.

b) Application. An application requesting th e use of minor permit m odification procedures shall meet the requirements of WAC 173-401- 510 and shall include the following:

i) A description of the cha nge, the emissions resulting fr om the change, and any new applicable requirements that wi ll apply if the change occurs;

ii) Lafarge's suggested draft permit;

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 92 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# iii) Certification by a responsible offici al, consistent with WAC 173-401-520, of the truth, accuracy, and completeness of th e application and that the proposed

modification meets the criteria for use of minor permit modification procedures and a request that such procedures be used; and

iv) Completed forms for the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to use to notify EPA and affected states as required under WAC 173-401-810 and 173-401-820.

c) Lafarge's ability to make change. Lafarg e may make the change proposed in its minor permit modification application immediately af ter it files such app lication provided that those changes requiring the submissions of a notice of construction application have been reviewed and approved by the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency. After Lafarge makes the change allowed by the preceding sentence, and until the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency takes any of the actions speci fied in WAC 173-401- 725(d), Lafarge must comply with both the appli cable requirements governing th e change and the proposed permit terms and conditions. During this time period, Lafarge need not comply with the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify. However, if Lafarge fails to comply with its proposed permit terms a nd conditions during this time period, the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify may be enforced against it.

d) Permit shield. The permit shield unde r WAC 173-401-640 shall not extend to minor permit modifications.

3) Group processing of minor permit modifications. Consistent with WAC 173-401-725(3), the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may process gr oups of a source's applications for certain modifications eligible for minor permit modification processing.

4) Significant modification procedures

. a) Criteria. Significant modifi cation procedures shall be used for applications requesting permit modifications that do not qualify as minor permit modifications or as administrative permit amendments. Every significant change in existing monitoring permit terms or conditions and every relaxa tion of reporting or r ecordkeeping permit terms or conditions shall be considered signifi cant. Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude Lafarge from making changes c onsistent with Chapter 173-401 WAC that would render existing permit complian ce terms and conditions irrelevant.

b) Significant permit modifications shall meet all requirements of Chapter 173-401 WAC, including those for ap plications, public participation, review by affected states, and review by EPA, as they apply to permit issuance and permit renewal. Puget Sound Clean Air Agency shall complete review on the majority of significant permit

modifications within nine months after receipt of a complete application.

[WAC 173-401-725, 11/4/93]]

F. Reopening for Cause

1) Standard provisions. This permit shall be reopened an d revised under any of the following

circumstances:

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 93 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# a) Additional applicable requi rements become applicable to Lafarge with a remaining permit term of three or more years. Such a reopening shall be completed not later than eighteen months after promulgation of the app licable requirement. No such reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the date on which the permit is due to expire, unless the original permit or any of its terms and conditions have been extended pursuant to WAC 173-401-620(2)(j);

b) Additional requirements (including excess em issions requirements) become applicable

to an affected source under the acid rain program. Upon approval by EPA, excess emissions offset plans shall be deemed to be incorporated into the permit;

c) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or EPA dete rmines that the permit contains a material

mistake or that inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit; or

d) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency or EPA determ ines that the permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements.

2) Procedures

. Proceedings to reopen a nd issue a permit shall follow the same procedures as apply to initial permit issuance and shall affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopening shall be made as expeditious ly as practicable.

3) Notice . Reopenings under this section shall not be initiated before a notice of such intent is provided to Lafarge by the Puget Sound Clean Air Ag ency at least thirty days in advance of the date that the permit is to be reopened, except that the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency may provide a shorter time period in the case of an emergency.

[WAC 173-401-730, 11/4/93]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 94 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# VII. PERMIT SHIELD

Compliance with the conditions of the permit shal l be deemed compliance with any applicable requirements contained in Sections I through VI of this permit that are specifically identified in this permit as of the date of permit issuance. [WAC 173-401-640(1)]

Nothing in this permit shall alter or affect the following:

(1) The provisions of Section 303 of the FCAA (e mergency orders), including the authority

of the administrator under that section;

(2) The liability of an owne r or operator of Lafarge for any violation of applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance;

(3) The applicable requirements of the acid ra in program, consistent with Section 408(a) of
the FCAA;

(4) The ability of EPA to obtain information from a source pursuant to Section 114 of the
FCAA; or

(5) The ability of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency to establish or revise requirements for the use of reasonably available control t echnology (RACT) as provided in Chapter 252,

Laws of 1993.

[WAC 173-401-640(4), 11/4/93]

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 95 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# VIII. INAPPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS

As of the date of perm it issuance, the requirements listed below do not apply to Lafa rge, or to the specific emission units specified below for the reas ons indicated. The permit shield applies to all requirements so identified. [WAC 173-401-640(2), 11/4/1993]

Citation Type of Requirement Basis for Nonapplicability



# RCW 70.94.531 Transportation

Demand
Management This section requires, within 6 months after King County's adoption of a commute trip reduction plan, employers develop a trip reduction program and submit the program to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency for review. This section is not an applicable requireme nt because it applies only to "major employers" that employ 100 or more full-time employees at a single work site who begin their work day between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Lafarge does not employ 100 or more workers; therefore, it is not an applicable requirement. This requirement does not apply to emission units or stationary sources.

WAC 173-400-075 (except asbestos NESHAPS) Emissions

Standards for Sources Emitting

Hazardous Air

Pollutants This requirement adopts the national emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants in 40 CFR Part 61 by reference and gives Ecology authority to conduct source tests and access to records to determine compliance. WAC 173-400- 075 is not an applicable requirement because none of the subparts of 40 CFR Part 61 apply to any emissions unit at Lafarge.

WAC 173-400-151 Retrofit Requirements for Visibility

Protection This is inapplicable because Ecology has not identified Lafarge as a source causing or contributing to impaired visibility in a Class I area. If Ecology makes such a determination, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency will reopen the permit.

WAC 173-435 Emergency Episode Plans This chapter is not an applicable requirement until it is triggered by a request from Ecology to prepare a Source Emission Reduction Plan (SERP). Absent a request for a SERP, nothing in this chapter (except WAC 173-435- 050(2)) imposes substantive requirements on sources.

WAC 173-434 Solid

Waste Incinerator Facilities (State effective date 1/22/04)

PENDING –effective

at such time as the EPA adopts this

version into the SIP. Emission and operational limits

for solid waste

incinerator

facilities WAC 173-434 (effective 1/22/04) includes provision to exclude solid waste streams presently approved for fuel substitution by Lafarge from the definition of solid waste under this regulation. Once the EPA approves this new version of WAC 173-434 into the Washington SIP, then this regulation will no longer apply to Lafarge for exempted waste streams. At the point of that SIP approval, all provisions of this permit based on the 10/18/90 version of WAC 173-434 will be superceded and no longer applicable.

WAC 173-435-050(2) Action Procedures Subsection (2) is not an applicable requirement because Lafarge's operations do not include open burning. The other subsections are not applicable requirements, because

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 96 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Citation Type of Requirement Basis for Nonapplicability



# they do not impose substantive requirements on facilities.

WAC 173-470 Ambient Air Quality Standards

for Particulate

Matter Ambient air quality standards are not "applicable requirements" [See WAC 173-400-200(4); 57 Fed. Reg. 32276 (July 22, 1992)].

WAC 173-474 Ambient Air Quality Standards

for Sulfur Oxides Ambient air quality standards are not "applicable requirements" [See WAC 173-400-200(4); 57 Fed. Reg. 32276 (July 22, 1992)].

WAC 173-475 Ambient Air Quality Standards

for Carbon
Monoxide, Ozone, and Nitrogen

Dioxide Ambient air quality standards are not "applicable requirements" [See WAC 173-400-200(4); 57 Fed. Reg. 32276 (July 22, 1992)].



# WAC 173-480 Ambient Air Quality

Standards and

Emission Limits

for

Radionuclides Ambient air quality standards are not "applicable requirements" [See WAC 173-400-200(4); 57 Fed. Reg. 32276 (July 22, 1992)]. These standards are also not applicable requirements because Lafarge does not emit

radionuclides.

WAC 173-481 Ambient Air Quality and

Environmental

Standards for

Fluorides Ambient air quality standards are not "applicable requirements" [See WAC 173-400-200(4); 57 Fed. Reg. 32276 (July 22, 1992)].

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I:

Article 5 Registration This section will not be applicable because Title V permitted sources are not subject to these registration and reporting requirements per RCW 70.94.161(17).

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 9.09(c)(1) (02/10/94) 5% opacity 1-hour

standard This regulation does not appl y because Lafarge has obtained Order of Approval 5183, following Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg: 9:04(d)(2) for an alternate opacity standard of 12% opacity.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 9.04(e) (04/9/98) Venturi Scrubber This section does not apply because Lafarge does not operate a Venturi scrubber and Lafarge will apply for a permit modification before installation.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 12.02(b) (08/10/89) Wet Control Equipment This section is not an applicable requirement because Lafarge does not use wet control equipment, and Lafarge will apply for a permit modifi cation before installation.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 12.03(c) (08/10/89) Pressure Loss Through

Scrubbers This section is not applicable because Lafarge does not use

scrubbers.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 97 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Citation Type of Requirement Basis for Nonapplicability



# Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 12.03(d) (08/10/89) Scrubber Liquid Supply Rate This section is not applicable because Lafarge does not use

scrubbers.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. I: 12.04(b) (08/10/89) Recordkeeping for

Scrubber Operations This section is not applicable because Lafarge does not use

scrubbers.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. II:
Articles 1, 2 & 3 Gasoline Marketing &

VOC Standards These sections are not applicable because Lafarge does not have equipment that is governed by this regulation.

Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Reg. III:

Articles 3 Chromium

Standards This section is inapplicable because Lafarge does not have any of the listed equipment a nd must obtain approval before installing this type of equipment.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 98 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# IX. INSIGNIFICANT EMISSION UNITS

A. Insignificant Emissi on Units and Activities

As of the date of permit issuance, the emission un its listed below are defi ned as insignificant for

the reasons indicated.

Unit Basis for IEU Designation

Lubricating oil storag e tanks WAC 173-401-532 (3)
Vehicle maintenance WAC 173-401-532 (7) Internal combustion engines for propelling or powering a

vehicle WAC 173-401-532(10)

Welding equipment WAC 173-401-532(12) Cleaning and sweeping of streets and paved surfaces WAC 173-401-532(35)
Roads (sweep and water for dust control) WAC 173-401-532(35)
Steam cleaner WAC 173-401-532(39)
Kerosene, grease, and oil drums WAC 173-401-532(42)
Truck wash WAC 173-401-532(45)

Window air conditione rs WAC 173-401-532(46)
Bathroom vents WAC 173-401-532(48)

Fuel and exhaust emissions from vehi cles in parking lots WAC 173-401-532(54)

Staff vehicles WAC 173-401-532(54)
Air compressor (electric) WAC 173-401-532(88)
Diesel Fuel Tank (kiln drive standby) 185 gal WAC 173-401-533(2)(a) Underground Diesel Fuel Tank 2000 gal WAC-173-401-533(2)(c)
Lignoute Tank WAC-173-401-533(2)(c) Finish Grinding Aid Ta nk WAC-173-401-533(2)(c)
Space Heaters < 5 MMBtu/hr WAC 173-401-533(2)(r) Underground Gasoline tank 1000 gal WAC 173-401-533(2)(t)
Safety-Kleen station WAC 173-401-533(2)(z) Calibration gases (for equi pment) WAC 173-401-533(3)(c)

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 99 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# X. APPENDIXES

A. Reference Methods (by reference only, not attached)

(1) EPA Method 5 [40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2001]

(2) EPA Method 6C [40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2001]

(3) EPA Method 9 [40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2001]

(4) EPA Method 26/26A [40 CFR 60, Appendix A, July 1, 2001

B. Non-EPA Test Methods

(1) Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Method 5 as approved by Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Board Resolution 540 dated August 11, 1983

(2) Ecology Method 9A

C. Reference Continuous Emission Monitoring Performance Specification (by reference only, not attached)

(1) EPA Performance Specification 1 (Opac ity Monitoring) [40 CFR 60, Appendix B, July 1, 1997]

(2) EPA Performance Specification 2 (SO2 Monitoring) [40 CFR 60, Appendix B, July 1, 1997]

D. EPA Quality Assurance Procedures

Main Stack and Clinker Cooler CEMS Operation and Reporting

1. Lafarge shall not operate the main stack and clinker cooler unless the emissions are continuously monitored in accordance with the requirements of Article 12. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I: 12.02(a), 4/9/1998].

2. Data Recovery. Lafarge shall recover valid hourly monitoring data for at least 95%

of the hours that main stack and clinker cooler are operated during each calendar month except for:

(a) Periods of monitoring system downtim e, provided that the owner or operator

demonstrates to the Control Officer that the downtime was not a result of inadequate design, operation, or mainte nance, or any other reasonably preventable condition, and any necessary repairs to the monitoring system are conducted in a timely manner; and

(b) Periods authorized under Section 3.03 or Section 6.07 of Regulation I.

[Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation I: 12.03(b), 4/9/1998].

3. Quality Assurance . Lafarge shall install a con tinuous emission monitoring system that meets the performance specification in 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B in effect at

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 100 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# the time of its insta llation, and shall operate this mon itoring system in accordance with the quality assurance procedures in Appendix F of 40 CFR Part 60 in effect July
1, 1997, and the U.S. Environmental Prot ection Agencyís ìRecommended Quality Assurance Procedures for Opacity Con tinuous Monitoring Systemsî (EPA 340/1-86- 010) (see Appendix B(1)). [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I: 12.03(c), 4/9/1998].

4. Data Recording . Monitoring data commencing on the clock hour and containing at least 45 minutes of monitoring data shall be reduced to 1-hour averages. Monitoring data for opacity shall also be reduced to 6-minute averages. All monitoring data shall be included in these averages except for da ta collected during calibration drift tests and cylinder gas audits, and for data collected subsequent to a fa iled quality assurance test or audit. [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Regulation I: 12.03(d), 4/9/1998].

5. Data Retention : Lafarge shall retain all monitoring data averages for at least 2 years, including copies of all reports submitted to the Agency and records of all repairs, adjustments, and maintenance performed on the monitoring system for main stack

and clinker cooler. All such data collected after October 1, 1998 sh all be retained for at least 5 years. [Puget Sound Clean Ai r Agency Regulation I: 12.03(e), 4/9/1998].

6. Data Reporting . Lafarge shall submit a monthly repor t to the Agency within 30 days

after the end of the month in which the data were recorded. This report shall include:

(a) The date, time period, magnitude (in the units of the standard) and cause of each emission that exceeded an applicable emission standard;

(b) The date and time of all actions taken to correct the problem, including any actions taken to minimize the emissions during periods of excess emissions and any actions taken to prevent there recurrence;

(c) The number of hours that the main stack and clinker cooler operated each month

and the number of valid hours of monitori ng data that the monitoring system
recovered each month;

(d) The date, time period, and cause of each failure to meet the data recovery requirements of Section 12.03(b) and any actions taken to ensure adequate
collection of such data;

(e) The date, time period, and cause of each failure to recover valid hourly monitoring data for at leas t 90% of the hours that the main stack and clinker cooler operated each day;

(f) The results of all periodic quality as surance checks and preventive maintenance audits (EPA 340/1-86-010, Subsection 2.2 below) conducted during the month;

and

(g) A certification of truth, accuracy, a nd completeness signed by an authorized representative of Lafarge.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 101 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# [Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Re gulation I: 12.03(f), 4/9/1998].

E. Recommended Quality Assurance Procedures for Opacity Continuous Monitoring Systems EPA 340/1-86-01Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 102 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004F. WAC 173-434 Solid Waste Incinerator Facilities Requirements (reference EU 1.66)Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodWAC 173-434 Solid Waste Incineration FacilitiesThese requirements apply as a result of waste fuels burned (see Conditions EU 1.10 and EU 1.12 through 1.15) and the SIP approved version of WAC 173-434(10/18/90). WAC 173-434 was updated (effective 1/22/04) and willexempt certain waste fuels from the applicability of this regulation. Once the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434 is incorporated into the SIP, Condition EU 1.66 this permit (along with the associated monitoring, recordkeeping, and reportingprovisions of this regulation) will be superceded and inapplicable for this permit, based on the presently approved operationsat Lafarge. These requirementsapply during periods when Lafarge is feeding solid waste fuels to the kiln.EU1.66(a)WAC 173-434-130(1)(b)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall not exceed emissionconcentrations of particulatematter from the kiln greater than0.030 gr/dscf (at 7% oxygen)since the kiln has a maximumcapability to burn solid waste at arate <250 tons/dayII.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoringII.A.2(d) AlternateOpacity Monitoring(3) 1-hourrunsPuget Sound Clean AirAgency Method 5(See Section X)EU1.66(b)WAC 173-434-130(3)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall not exceed emissionconcentrations of sulfur dioxidegreater than 50 ppmv (dry) (at 7%oxygen) unless a higher limit isapproved that is based on at least80% emission control.II.A.2(b) SO2CEMS1-houraverageEPA Method 6C (40CFR 60, Appendix A,July 1, 2001)(40 CFR 60, AppendixB , & Appendix F,7/1/19970Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 103 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU1.66(c)WAC 173-434-130(4)(a)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall not exceed visibleemissions from the kiln greaterthan an average of 5 percentopacity for more than sixconsecutive minutes in any sixtyminute period.II.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoring6-minuteperiodEPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB July 1, 1997)Ecology Method 9A7/12/1990(See Section X)EU1.66(d)WAC 173-434-130(4)(b)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall not exceed visibleemissions from the kiln, asmeasured by a transmissometer,greater than an average of 10percent opacity for more than sixconsecutive minutes in any sixtyminute period.II.A.2(a) OpacityCEMS6-minuteperiodEPA Method 9(40 CFR 60, AppendixA, July 1, 2001EPA PerformanceSpecification 1(40 CFR 60, AppendixB, July 1, 1997)EU1.66(e)WAC 173-434-130(4)(c)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall not exceed visibleemissions from emission units(other than the kiln) greater thanan average of 0 percent opacityfor more than six consecutiveminutes in any sixty minuteperiod.II.A.1(a) GeneralVisual OpacityMonitoring6-minuteperiodEPA Method 9(40 CFR 60, AppendixA, July 1, 2001Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 104 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU1.66(f)WAC 173-434-130(5)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall take reasonableprecautions to prevent fugitiveemissions, which includes pavingof all normally traveled roadwayswithin the plant boundary andenclosing or hooding materialtransfer points.No monitoringrequired.N/AEU1.66(g)WAC 173-434-160(1)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 When ever solid waste is beingburned, Lafarge shall operate thekiln such that the finalcombustion zone temperatureshall not be below 1800oF for a15 minute average nor below1600oF for any reading.AdditionalMonitoring,Recordkeeping &Reporting for SolidWaste IncineratorFacilities (AppendixF)15-minuteaverage andinstantaneousEU1.66(h)WAC 173-434-160(2)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall maintain acombustion gas residence time of1.0 seconds in the kiln.AdditionalMonitoring,Recordkeeping &Reporting for SolidWaste IncineratorFacilities (AppendixF)N/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 105 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU1.66(i)WAC 173-434-160(3)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall operate the kilnsuch that combustion gasesleaving the kiln have at least 3%oxygen measured on a wet basis.AdditionalMonitoring,Recordkeeping &Reporting for SolidWaste IncineratorFacilities (AppendixF)24-houraverageEU1.66(j)WAC 173-434-160(4)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall minimize odor andfugitive emissions from thetipping area.II.A.1(c) FacilityWide InspectionsII.A.1(d) GeneralFugitive DustEU1.66(k)WAC 173-434-160(5)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall control pressurizedcombustion air distribution.AdditionalMonitoring,Recordkeeping &Reporting for SolidWaste IncineratorFacilities (AppendixF)Permit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 106 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU1.66(l)WAC 173-434-160(6)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall operate the kilnsuch that the inlet temperature tothe electrostatic precipitator shallnot exceed 350oF.AdditionalMonitoring,Recordkeeping &Reporting for SolidWaste IncineratorFacilities (AppendixF)24-houraverageEU1.66(m)WAC 173-434-160(7)This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall operate the kilnconsistent with good air pollutioncontrol practice.II.A(1) MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirements(Facility-wide)II.B. Operation andMaintenance (O&M)Plan RequirementsN/APermit No. 14046Expiration Date: May 15, 2009Page 107 of 109Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004;Modification Issued July 28, 2004Reqmt.No.EnforceableRequirementAdoption orEffective DateRequirement Paraphrase(Information Only)Monitoring,Maintenance &RecordkeepingMethod(See Section II &Appendix F)EmissionStandardPeriodReferenceTest MethodEU1.66(n)WAC 173-434-090This requirement shall besuperseded and becomeinapplicable by the 1/22/04version of WAC 173-434once it is adopted into theSIP10/18/90 Lafarge shall develop a plan foroperation and maintenance of thekiln to maintain compliance withthe requirements of WAC 173-434.Lafarge shall update the plan aswarranted, and shall submit theplan for Puget Sound Clean AirAgency approval every 24months, commencing August 1,2004.Lafarge may elect to integrate theWAC 173-434 O&M Plan intothe general O&M Plan requiredby Condition I.A.14. If so thegeneral O&M Plan shallspecifically identify thoseprovisions required by thiscondition.II.A. MinimumMonitoring,MaintenanceReporting &RecordkeepingRequirementsN/AN/A = Not Applicable. A specificreference test method and/or emission standard period is specified in the requirement. A test method is neither needed nor appropriate.

# Permit No. 14046 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 108 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# Additional Monitoring, Recordkeeping, & Reporting for Solid Waste Incineration

Facilities

Monitoring & Recordkeeping

Lafarge shall continuously monitor and record the following operational parameters during any 24 hour period (commencing 12 p.m.) in which the kiln combusts solid waste:

• Final combustion zone temperature. The aver age temperature shall be recorded for each

15 minute block interval. Records shall no te any measurement below 1600° F and any

15 minute block in which the combustion zone temperature averages less than 1800° F.

• Particulate control device temperature (elect rostatic precipitator inlet). The average temperature shall be recorded for each 24 hour period commencing at 12 p.m. Records shall note any 24 hour block during which the average temperature exceeds 350° F.

• Oxygen (for excess air, kiln outlet). The av erage oxygen concentrati on shall be recorded for each 24 hour period commencing at 12 p.m. Records shall note any 24 hour block during which the average oxygen concentration measured on a wet basis is less than 3

percent.

• Carbon monoxide. The averag e carbon monoxide shall be recorded for each 24 hour period commencing at 12 p.m.

• Combustion air distribution and residence time . The average free lime (CaO) content in

clinker shall be recorded for each 24-hour period commencing at 12 p.m., as an

indication of combustion air and residence time control.

The continuous monitoring systems described in th is condition shall meet the data recovery and data recording requirements set forth in Cond ition II.A.2(b), except th at the electrostatic precipitator inlet temperature CMS shall meet the requirements of Conditions II.A.2(i) and II.A.2(k).

[WAC 173-434-170(1), (10/18/90), WAC 173-434-170(2) , (10/18/90)]

Monthly Monitoring Report

Lafarge shall file with the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency a monthly WAC 173-434 monitoring report within 15 days of end of each cale ndar month which will include the following:

• Average daily maximum and daily maximum co ncentration of opacity (percent), sulfur dioxide (ppm) and carbon monoxide (ppm) and the daily amount of solid waste burned.

• Date, time, and magnitude of any periods dur ing which the standards identified in the requirements for Condition EU 1.66 (as shown in Appendix F of this permit) were

exceeded and what corrective action was or will be taken.

• Any period(s) during which the kiln c ontinuous monitoring systems for opacity, combustion zone temperature, particulate cont rol device temperature and air flow, sulfur dioxide, oxygen and/or carbon monoxide do not meet the a pplicable data recovery requirements of Section II.A.2 of this permit .

# Permit No. 11656 Expiration Date: May 15, 2009 Page 109 of 109

Lafarge Operating Permit, May 15, 2004; Modification Issued July 28, 2004 

# [WAC 173-434-170(2), 10/18/90]

Change in Operation Reports for Solid Waste Incinerator Facilities

In the event a startup, shutdown, breakdown, or upset conditi on occurs that could result in a

violation of one or more of Conditions EU 1.66 (as shown in Appendix F of this permit) or a violation of an ambient air quality standard, Lafarge shall take the following actions as applicable:

• For planned conditions, such as startups and shutdowns, that Lafarge expects to cause a violation, the condition shall be reported to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency not less

than 24-hours in advanc e of its occurrence.

• For unplanned conditions, such as a breakdow n or upset, the conditi on shall be reported to the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency as soon as possible, but no later than the end of the next business day.

[WAC 173-434-190, 10/18/90]

Inapplicable Requirements

As of the date of perm it issuance, the requirements listed below do not apply to Lafa rge, or to the specific emission units specified below for the reas ons indicated. The permit shield applies to all requirements so identified. These inapplicable requirements are solely associated with WAC 173-434 (10/18/90) and are in addition to inapplicable requirements id entified in Section VIII of the permit. [WAC 173-401-640(2), 11/4/1993]

Citation Type of Requirement Basis for Nonapplicability



# WAC 173-434- 130(1)(a) (10/18/90) Particulate

emission limit for large incinerators This subsection is not applicab le because Lafargeís kiln is not capable of burning 250 tons per day of solid waste.

WAC 173-434-130(2) (10/18/90) 50 ppm HCl limit

for incinerators This subsection does not apply because WAC 173-434- 100(2) states that ìWhenever more than one regulation applies to the control of air contaminants from an incinerator facility the more st ringent regulation, control or emission limit shall govern.î Lafarge has elected to be regulated as an area source under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL. To maintain this status Lafarge must limit its HCl emissions to approximately 4.68 ppm of HCl (at 7% O 2 

# ). The operational limits needed to maintain area source status are far more stringent than the 50 ppm HCl limit in WAC 173-434-130(2).