alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Buck ZION v. Lloyd STOCKFLETH, Chevron Oil Company and State Farm Automobile Insurance Company.

No. 87-C-2353.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 30, 1987.

In re Stockfleth, Lloyd; Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 87-CA-0347; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “B” Number 195-734.

Granted. The previous order of this Court appointing Judge Zacearía is vacated and recalled. The case is remanded to Judge Richards for proceeding under R.S. 13:4209.

CALOGERO, Justice,

concurs in part and dissents in part and assigns reasons:

I agree with the majority’s recalling its order of January 13, 1987. That order was signed routinely without the Court’s having been alerted to the fact that the very matter involved was before the Court of Appeal at the time. In fact, on January 5, the Court of Appeal had directed that the successor judge, Judge Richards, could thereafter render a judgment or “the Supreme Court could be asked to issue an order again appointing Judge Zacearía....” And on January 30, 1987, upon denying the rehearing application, the Court of Appeal, per curiam, stated that “the Honorable Ernest V. Richards IV, can sign a new judgment as authorized by R.S. 13:4209 or he can ask the Supreme Court to assign the former judge (Zacearía) to the district court to appropriately dispose of case No. 195-734.”

However, I disagree with the remainder of the majority’s summary disposition order. I would do what the Court of Appeal attempted to do on January 30, 1987, and direct Judge Richards to sign a new judgment as authorized by R.S. 13:4209 or, if he prefers, ask this Court to assign a judge, including Judge Zacearía, to the district court to dispose of this case.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 239

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh, who was abducted

from the United States, should be returned home to her mother, Ms.

Maureen Dabbagh.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. ROBB (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

JUNE 28, 2000

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

JULY 19, 2000

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh,

who was abducted from the United States, should be

returned home to her mother, Ms. Maureen Dabbagh.

Whereas Mr. Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh and Mrs. Maureen

Dabbagh had a daughter, Nadia Dabbagh, in 1990;

Whereas Maureen Dabbagh and Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh

were divorced in February 1992;

Whereas in 1993, Nadia was abducted by her father;

Whereas Mohamad Hisham fled the United States with

Nadia;
2

SRES 239 ATS

Whereas the Governments of Syria and the United States

have granted child custody to Maureen Dabbagh and

both have issued arrest warrants for Mohamad Dabbagh;

Whereas Mohamad Dabbagh originally escaped to Saudi Arabia;

Whereas the Department of State believed that Nadia was residing in Syria until late 1998;

Whereas the Senate passed S. Res. 293 for Nadia Dabbagh

on October 21, 1998, asking Syria to aid in the return

of Nadia to her mother in the United States;

Whereas in 1999, Syria invited Maureen Dabbagh to Syria

to meet with her daughter;

Whereas the Department of State believes that in 1999

Nadia was moved to Saudi Arabia and is residing with

Mohamad Dabbagh;

Whereas although Nadia is in Saudi Arabia, neither she nor

Mohamad Dabbagh are Saudi Arabian citizens;

Whereas Maureen Dabbagh, with the assistance of missing

children organizations, has been unable to reunite with

her daughter;

Whereas the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and Interpol have been unsuccessful in their

attempts to bring Nadia back to the United States;

Whereas Maureen Dabbagh has not seen her daughter in

more than six years; and

Whereas it will take the continued effort and pressure on the

part of the Saudi Arabian officials to bring this case to

a successful conclusion: Now, therefore, be it
3

SRES 239 ATS

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the

2 Governments of the United States and Saudi Arabia im3 mediately locate Nadia and deliver her safely to her moth4 er.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 336 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 336

    Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the contributions, 
sacrifices, and distinguished service of Americans exposed to radiation 
  or radioactive materials as a result of service in the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2000

Ms. Snowe (for herself, Mr. Murkowski, and Mr. Wellstone) submitted the 
        following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the contributions, 
sacrifices, and distinguished service of Americans exposed to radiation 
  or radioactive materials as a result of service in the Armed Forces.

Whereas the Nation has a responsibility to veterans who are injured, or who 
        incur a disease, while serving in the Armed Forces, including the 
        provision of health care, cash compensation, and other benefits for such 
        disabilities;
Whereas from 1945 to 1963, the United States conducted test explosions of 
        approximately 235 nuclear devices, potentially exposing approximately 
        220,000 members of the Armed Forces to unknown levels of radiation, and 
        approximately 195,000 members of the Armed Forces have been identified 
        as participants in the occupation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, 
        after World War II;
Whereas many of these veterans later claimed that low levels of radiation 
        released during such tests, or exposure to radiation during such 
        occupation, may be a cause of certain medical conditions; and
Whereas Sunday, July 16, 2000, is the 55th anniversary of the first nuclear 
        explosion, the Trinity Shot in New Mexico: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) July 16, 2000, should be designated as a ``National Day 
        of Remembrance'' in order to honor veterans exposed to 
        radiation or radioactive materials during service in the Armed 
        Forces; and
            (2) the contributions, sacrifices, and distinguished 
        service on behalf of the United States of the Americans exposed 
        to radiation or radioactive materials while serving in the 
        Armed Forces are worthy of solemn recognition.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

I, Allan Silber, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-Link Incorporated;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         [Intentionallyomitted];

 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(d)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: October 14, 2003

 
| By:    | /s/  Allan Silber              |
|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   | Allan Silber                        |
|   | President, Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 92 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 92

  Expressing the sense of the Senate that funding for prostate cancer 
              research should be increased substantially.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 3, 1999

 Mrs. Boxer (for herself, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Reid, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
    Schumer, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Mack, Mr. Coverdell, and Mr. Helms) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
               on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate that funding for prostate cancer 
              research should be increased substantially.

Whereas in 1999, prostate cancer is expected to kill more than 37,000 men in the 
        United States and be diagnosed in over 180,000 new cases;
Whereas prostate cancer is the most diagnosed nonskin cancer in the United 
        States;
Whereas African Americans have the highest incidence of prostate cancer in the 
        world;
Whereas considering the devastating impact of the disease among men and their 
        families, prostate cancer research remains underfunded;
Whereas more resources devoted to clinical and translational research at the 
        National Institutes of Health will be highly determinative of whether 
        rapid advances can be attained in treatment and ultimately a cure for 
        prostate cancer;
Whereas the Congressionally Directed Department of Defense Prostate Cancer 
        Research Program is making important strides in innovative prostate 
        cancer research, and this Program presented to Congress in April of 1998 
        a full investment strategy for prostate cancer research at the 
        Department of Defense; and
Whereas the Senate expressed itself unanimously in 1998 that the Federal 
        commitment to biomedical research should be doubled over the next 5 
        years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This resolution may be cited as the ``Prostate Cancer Research 
Commitment Resolution of 1999''.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE SENATE.

    It is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) finding treatment breakthroughs and a cure for prostate 
        cancer should be made a national health priority;
            (2) significant increases in prostate cancer research 
        funding, commensurate with the impact of the disease, should be 
        made available at the National Institutes of Health and to the 
        Department of Defense Prostate Cancer Research Program; and
            (3) these agencies should prioritize prostate cancer 
        research that is directed toward innovative clinical and 
        translational research projects in order that treatment 
        breakthroughs can be more rapidly offered to patients.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marlene HOWARD, Appellant, v. Earl HOWARD, Appellee. Connie Scott STALEY, Appellant, v. Mark D. STALEY, Appellee.

Nos. 87-3203, 87-3204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 13, 1988.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1988.

Osborne Walker O’Quinn, Fort Pierce, for appellants.

Jacqueline L. Russakis, Fort Pierce, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the orders at issue herein because we do not believe the appellants have demonstrated an abuse of discretion. Notwithstanding our affirmance we caution trial judges to be certain that child support orders are properly enforced even during the pendency of an action for modification by the parent obligated to make support payments. Children should not be deprived of support from a parent able to *1225pay even during the pendency of a modification proceeding.

ANSTEAD, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
**Draft: Rail Vehicle**  **s Access A** **dvisory Committee Subcommittee**  **on Boarding and A**  **lighting Scope:**  The scope of this subcommittee is to review the current requirements for accessible boarding and alighting in the Access Board’s Rail Vehicle Accessibility Guide lines , which were originally issued in September, 1991 and have not been updated since that time. **Objective:** Recommend proposed revisions to update, improve or expand the scoping and technical criteria in order to ensure an acceptable level of access fo r individuals with disabilities on rapid rail, light rail, commuter rail, intercity rail and other vehicles and systems covered under the Board’s current guidelines

. These recommendations will be based on current regulations and consideration of changes t hat have taken place in vehicle structure, technology and the needs and desires of people with disabilities. The subcommittee will address  Types of devices and methods available and appropriate for boarding and alighting on rapid rail, light rail, commute r rail, intercity rail and other vehicles and systems covered under the Board’s current guidelines;  Permanent vs temporary installation vs platform - based devices and backup methods in case of mechanical failure;  L evel boarding definition and evaluation of use by different car types for light/heavy & intercity trains at level , and sometimes shared, platforms ;  Wh eelchair lif

t capacity, platform barriers, self - operation;  Ramp and bridgeplate slope and railing requirements , on - board storage and deployment area requirements;  Gaps between vehicle and platform and potential for gap filler devices ;  Exterior doors and doorways including minimum width, adjacent handrails, and a ccess to bi - level platforms; and  Other boarding and alighting issues that may become important during subcommittee discussions. **Timetable:** Complete the review and recommendations by October 2014 , for consideration by the full committee

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Main Street and Main Incorporated (the“Company”) for the year ended December 29, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, MichaelGarnreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(3)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(4)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Michael Garnreiter     |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| Michael Garnreiter         |
| Chief Financial Officer    |
|                       |
| Date:  March 23, 2004 |

 

----
**Exhibit
      10.23**





**FIFTH
      AMENDMENT**


**TO**


**LOAN
      AGREEMENT**








THIS
      FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of December 31,
      2007 by and between C2 Global Technologies Inc., formerly known as Acceris
      Communications Inc.and as I-Link Incorporated, a Florida corporation (the
“ **Borrower** ”)
      and
      Counsel Corporation, an Ontario corporation (the “ **Lender** ”).





WHEREAS,
      the Borrower and Lender are parties to a Loan Agreement as amended, dated
      January 26, 2004 (the " **Loan
      Agreement** ”)
      and
      the parties desire to further amend the Loan Agreement with effect from December
      31, 2007 (“the **Effective
      Date** ”)
      as
      provided herein.





NOW,
      THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt and adequacy of
      which
      is hereby acknowledged it is agreed as follows:





1.  Extension
      of Maturity Date .
      Effective as of the Effective Date, Section 2 of the Loan Agreement is hereby
      amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:





Payments
      of Principal and Interest .
      All
      borrowings hereunder, together with any interest thereon, shall be due and
      payable to the Lender in one installment on December 31, 2008 (the “Maturity
      Date”) provided, however, that notwithstanding the above, the Maturity Date
      shall be accelerated to the date ten (10) calendar days following closing under
      or conclusion of each occurrence of (a) an equity investment or investments
      in
      the Borrower by a third party unrelated to the Lender through the capital
      markets, whether pursuant to a registered offering or unregistered offering
      or
      other transaction (an “Equity Investment”); provided, further, however, that the
      Maturity Date shall be accelerated with respect only to the portion of the
      unpaid Indebtedness equal to the net amount received by the Borrower from any
      such Equity Investment.








2.  Effect
      on Loan Agreement and Loan Note .
      This
      Fifth Amendment is not intended, nor shall it be construed, as a modification
      or
      termination of the Amended and Restated Debt Restructuring Agreement, dated
      October 15, 2002. Except as expressly provided herein, the Loan Agreement and
      the Note annexed thereto are hereby ratified and confirmed and remain in full
      force and effect in accordance with their respective terms.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower and the Lender have executed this Fifth Amendment
      as of December 31, 2007.




[See
        attached signature page]







[Signature
        page to Fifth Amendment Loan Agreement, dated
 December
        31, 2007]






C2
              GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.By:Name:
              Title:


COUNSEL
              CORPORATIONBy:Name:
              Title:
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Jon C. Engman, Chief Financial Officer of
SAFLINK Corporation (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     
|---------------------
|Dated: March 28, 2003
|
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of XL Generation International
Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, Flemming Munck, Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Registrant.


Date:  December 29, 2005                   By:  /s/ Flemming Munck
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Name:  Flemming Munck
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer,
                                                       and Member of the Board
                                                       of Directors
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 79

A resolution designating the Chairman of the Joint Economic Committee

for the 106th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

A resolution designating the Chairman of the Joint Economic

Committee for the 106th Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following Senator is designated as

2 the Chairman of the following committee for the 106th

3 Congress, or until his successor is chosen:

4 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE: Mr. Mack, Chairman.

Æ
SCWC-29927

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

EMILY THOMAS-YUKIMURA, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

DAVID YUKIMURA, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(ICA NO. 29927; FC-D NO. 07-1-0098)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on April

15, 2013 by Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant David Yukimura is

hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29927

29-MAY-2013

11:22 AM
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 29, 2013.

David Yukimura, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

pro se 

 /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

 /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

 /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

 /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2