alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 199

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael E. DiROSA.

No. 87-KK-1250.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re DiRosa, Michael; applying for writ of error and/or appeal and supervisory writ; First Parish Court of Jefferson Parish, Div. “A”, No. 657552; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-KH-0537.

Granted. The district court is ordered to allow relator to proceed in forma pauperis.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 ACCERIS COMMUNICATIONS INC.OFFICERS CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350) October 25, 2004 The undersigned Gary M. Clifford, duly appointed and incumbent officer of
Acceris Communications Inc., a Florida corporation (the Corporation), in
connection with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the annual
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby represent, warrant
and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Corporation. /s/ Gary M. CliffordGary M. CliffordChief Financial Officer and Vice President of
Finance
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 5, 2009



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|    |  | Patrick Bratton        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certification set forth below is being submittedin connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MuellerGroup, LLC (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

I, Jeffery W. Sprick, the Chief Financial Officer ofMueller Group, LLC, certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mueller Group, LLC.

| Date: March 30, 2006 |   | By:    |     | /s/ JEFFERY W. SPRICK      |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|----------|----------------------------|
|                      |   |   |     | Jeffery W. Sprick          |
|                      |   |   | * * | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

Appellee

______________________

2019-1437

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

01417.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, 

Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented 

by MICHAEL CHAOCHA TING. 

 NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, 

argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL,

JOSEPH PALYS; PAUL ANDERSON, Houston, TX. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 19-1437 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 03/16/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 16, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1437 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 03/16/2020
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

t0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

146149

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146149

COA: 305037

Oakland CC: 2010

- 234389

- FC

DOUGLAS ROY BURNS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 18, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO , J., not participating.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. CON. RES. 185

Expressing deep regret for the refusal of the United States to provide political

asylum to the Jewish refugees aboard the S.S. ST. LOUIS in May

and June of 1939.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 2001

Mr. AKIN (for himself, Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. GONZALEZ,

Mr. KUCINICH, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. MEEK of Florida, Mr. NADLER, Ms.

ROS-LEHTINEN, and Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing deep regret for the refusal of the United States

to provide political asylum to the Jewish refugees aboard

the S.S. ST. LOUIS in May and June of 1939.

Whereas on May 13, 1939, the ocean liner S.S. ST. LOUIS

departed from Hamburg, Germany, with 937 passengers,

including more than 900 Jewish refugees fleeing from

Nazi persecution;

Whereas after the Cuban Government refused to provide political asylum to the refugees on May 27, 1939, the S.S.

ST. LOUIS proceeded to the coast of South Florida in

hopes that the United States would accept the refugees;
2

•HCON 185 IH

Whereas the United States refused to allow the S.S. ST.

LOUIS to dock and thereby provide a haven for the Jewish refugees;

Whereas the United States ordered a United States Coast

Guard cutter to patrol near the S.S. ST. LOUIS to prevent any passenger from jumping to freedom;

Whereas the S.S. ST. LOUIS was forced to return to Antwerp, Belgium, with the refugees; and

Whereas many of the passengers of the S.S. ST. LOUIS died

in Nazi death camps: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate

2 concurring), That the Congress expresses its deep regret

3 for the refusal of the United States to provide political

4 asylum to the Jewish refugees aboard the S.S. ST. LOUIS

5 in May and June of 1939.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 27, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Wells Financial Corp., Wells, Minnesota, has applied to become a 
bank holding company as a result of the proposed conversion of its 
wholly owned subsidiary, Wells Federal Bank, Wells, Minnesota, from a 
federal savings bank to a Minnesota state-chartered commercial bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 28, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-7802 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Eric A. Balzer, Chief
Financial Officer of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

    (1)  such Annual Report on Form 10-K of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION for the year December 31, 2006, fully complies with
         the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
         RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for the year ended December 31,
         2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operations of RAMTRON INTERNATIONAL
         CORPORATION.


/s/ Eric A. Balzer
-------------------
Eric A. Balzer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and
Duly Authorized Officer of the
Registrant)

February 16, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Ramtron International Corporation and will be retained by Ramtron
International Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                    Page-1
<PAGE>
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Thomas N. ChieffeThomas N. ChieffePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) -27-
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JESSE ADRIAN MARTINEZ, 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00253-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20160D03012)

O R D E R

The Court has received and filed the supplemental clerk’s record requested in this Court’s 

Opinion issued January 10, 2018. The appeal is therefore reinstated, and the Reporter’s Record 

shall be due in this office on or before March 3, 2018. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of February, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2





C2
GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.





OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





The
undersigned Stephen A. Weintraub, duly appointed and incumbent officer of C2
Global Technologies Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in
connection with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual
period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of
his knowledge:





1.
              The
      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Corporation.





March 31,
2010





/s/ Stephen A. WeintraubStephen
      A. WeintraubExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and CorporateSecretary
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ELIE RAPHAEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-0593

[August 23, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-

13281CF10A.

Elie Raphael, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. 

Bettendorf, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Patty DOYLE, Appellant, v. POLO SYNDICATIONS, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-2011.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 14, 1988.

David L. Gorman of Gorman and Zeidel, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellant.

*1088Robert M. Weinberger and Ned Kimmel-man of Cohen, Scherer, Cohn & Silverman, P.A., North Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This was an effort by appellant to institute supplemental proceedings in order to collect upon a final judgment awarding money damages. The supplemental complaint was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and are convinced that the appellant substantially complied with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987) and case law requirements so as to establish jurisdiction. We are further convinced that appellee received abundant procedural due process so that no prejudice occurred so as to constitute reversible error.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., and DAUKSCH, JAMES C., JR., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Internet Acquisition
Group, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that:




1.           
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and




2.           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







Date:  May
      13, 2008
            By:/s/
      Qingfu RenQingfu
      Ren, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
# Euroopa Liidu C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 138I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 63. aastakäik28. aprill 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 138I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

63. aastakäik28. aprill 2020

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Teave |
| | TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT |
| | Euroopa Komisjon |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EL) 2020/560, millega muudetakse määrusi (EL) nr 508/2014 ja (EL) nr 1379/2013 seoses erimeetmetega COVID-19 puhangu mõju leevendamiseks kalandus- ja vesiviljelussektoris | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

IV   Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

2020/C 138 I/01

Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EL) 2020/560, millega muudetakse määrusi (EL) nr 508/2014 ja (EL) nr 1379/2013 seoses erimeetmetega COVID-19 puhangu mõju leevendamiseks kalandus- ja vesiviljelussektoris

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

IV Teave

TEAVE EUROOPA LIIDU INSTITUTSIOONIDELT, ORGANITELT JA ASUTUSTELT

Euroopa Komisjon

| 28.4.2020 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 138/1

---

Komisjoni avaldus seoses Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrusega (EL) 2020/560, millega muudetakse määrusi (EL) nr 508/2014 ja (EL) nr 1379/2013 seoses erimeetmetega COVID-19 puhangu mõju leevendamiseks kalandus- ja vesiviljelussektoris

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Komisjon peab kiiduväärseks, et Euroopa Parlament ja nõukogu võtsid kiiresti vastu tema ettepaneku muuta Euroopa Merendus- ja Kalandusfondi, et leevendada COVID-19 puhangu mõju ning aidata kalureid ja vesiviljelustootjaid.

Komisjon soovib rõhutada, et kalanduskontrollil ja teaduslike andmete kogumisel on väga oluline roll kalavarude säästval majandamisel, mis tugineb parimatele kättesaadavatele teaduslikele nõuannetele ja usaldusväärsele rakendamisele. Rahaliste vahendite vähendamine selles valdkonnas ei tohiks kaasa tuua ühise kalanduspoliitika kõnealuste oluliste teguritega saavutatavate tulemuste halvenemist.

Komisjon soovib toonitada, et tema ettepanekus ja sellesse tehtud muudatustes käsitletakse COVID-19 puhangu põhjustatud ainulaadset kriisiolukorda ning erakordset ja kohest vajadust toetada selle puhangu tagajärgedega tegelemist. Nimetatud ettepanek ega selle muudatused ei tohi mõjutada tulevast Euroopa Merendus- ja Kalandusfondi määrust.

---
#### Wilkinson, Appellant, *v.*Wilkinson, Appellee.

(No. 31396

Decided April 28, 1948.)

*Messrs. Myers & Myers*and *Mr. Robert D. Touvelle,*for appellant.

*580
      *Mr. Robert L. Barrington*and *Mr. Kerns Wright,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

. *Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman, Sohngen and Stewart, JJ., concur;