alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1


# OAR Box 1828 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 115 ) ll-K-(B)-10 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:52 AM Sheet 115of 3 25

# A-83-2 7 ENERGYAN D ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . II-K-(B)-10 4 Apri l 8 , 198 3

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Subject : EPAContrac t No . 68-02-3564 , Wor k Assignmen t # 9 Dea r Robert : I n ou r meetin g o n Marc h17 , 1983 , i t wa s suggeste d tha t perhap s two set s o f IFCA Mrun s woul d b e prepare d fo r th e preliminaryresult s o f th e industria l boile r NSP S S0

_ impac t analysis . On e se t woul d correspond wit hrecen t America n Boile r Manufacturer s Associatio n (ABMA ) ne windus

tria l fossi l fuel-fire d boile r sale s forecasts . Th e othe r se t woul d correspond wit hth e projecte d growt hi n industria l boile r fossi l fue l demand use d i n th e recen t DO E analysi s o f natura l ga s wellhea d pric e deregulatio n proposals . EE Ai s plannin g t o produc e IFCA Mresult s fo r 1986-199 0 an d 1986-199 5 fo r th e preliminar yindustria l boile r NSP S S0

_impac t analysis . However , th e recen t ABM

Aprojection s (dated Novembe r 17 , 198 2 an d Marc h18 , 1983 ) d o no t extend beyond 1988 . I f yo u wis ht o revie wa se t o f IFCA Mresult s whic hi s compatibl e wit hABM Aprojections , wha t shoul d w e assume th e ne w industria l fossi l fuel-fire d boile r sale s wil l b e betwee n 198 8 an d 1995 ? Th e attache d tabl e present s a projectio n o f th e numbe r o f ne windustria l fossi l fuel-fire d boiler s whic hma yb e subjec t t o th e revise d SO ^ NSPS . Thi s tabl e correspond s wit hth e projection s o f industria l fossi l fue l demand whic hwa s forwarde d t o yo u i n a lette r date d Apri l 6 , 1983 . Thi s tabl e summarize s an alternativ e t o an "ABMA-compatible " projectio n o f th e numbe r o f ne windustria l fossi l fuel-fire d boilers . Sincerely ,
Ti mHoga n TH:m k Attachmen t cc : Al Weh eP. 3

PROJECTION S OF TH E NUMBE R O F NE WINDUSTRIAL

FOSSI L FUEL-FIRE D BOILERS 3

Siz e Clas s Firs t Yea r o f Operatio n (MMBtu/hr ) 1986-199 0 1986-199 5 50-7 5 75-10 0 100-15 0 150-20 0 200-25 0 >25 0 Tota l (>50 )

Include s ne wboiler s designe d t o bur n natura l gas , distillat e fue l oil , residua l fue l oi l o r coal . B ycomparison , o n Marc h18 , 1983 , ABM Apredicte d 49 8 ne wgas / oi l and coa l domesti c industria l boile r order s (eachlarge r tha n 50,00 0 lbstea mpe r hour ) fo r th e 1984-198 8 period .



### 37 3 16 2 22 2 13 4 5 1 

### 13 0 l,072 b 

### 94 8 55 4 63 0 28 3 11 1 27 3 2,79 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000847468
<NAME>                        WASTE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     USD
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998    
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         193613
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5457562
<ALLOWANCES>                                   222028
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10198432
<PP&E>                                         48948513
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4262778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 96116699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16718221
<BONDS>                                        60000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       117184
<OTHER-SE>                                     37810712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   96116699
<SALES>                                        21044584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21044584
<CGS>                                          12399529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19000952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4482478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4073693)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6205925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   43174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6249099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (246539)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6495634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.00)
        


</TABLE>
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

i 

ROSE MOFFORD. GOVERNOR 

RANDOLPH WOOD. DIRECTOR 

June 25, 1990 

Mr. Daniel McGovern 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

205 Fremont Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

RE : SUBMITTAL OF STATE IMPLEMENTATION REVISION 

Dear Mr. McGovern: 

Consistent with the provisions of A.R.S. 49-424.A. (Attachment l), 

40 CFR 51.1, and 40 CFR 51.6, the Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality (ADEQ) hereby submits to the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, as a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), five copies of the PMlo Plan for the 

Paul Spur Group I Area. This package contains all relevant 

documents as adopted by the ADEQ. 

Attachment 2 contains appropriate information for the Completeness 

Checklist. If your office requires any additional information, 

please contact Mr. Ira Domsky of our Air Quality Planning Office 

at (602) 257-2321. 

Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. 

Randolph Wood 

Director 

Enclosures 

The Department of Environmenlal Quality is An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer. 

Central Palm Plaza Building 2005 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004
**Exhibit** **32.1**

 

**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of MPC Corporation. (the “*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

|            | /s/ John P. Yeros                    |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------|
| August 17, 2007 | John P. Yeros                        |
|            | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL
Intermediate, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Stein, Vice President and
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Joseph Stein            
|Joseph Stein                
|Vice President and Treasurer
|EPL Intermediate, Inc.      
|November 14, 2005           



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by EPL Intermediate, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### George N. LeFEBVRE v. Darryl D. DORSETT, Frank G. Appleby, Peter F. Kersten and Robert B. Merrell.

No. 58186.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 21, 1988.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; John S. Morris, Chancellor.

*1356Raymond L. Brown, Brown & Associates, Pascagoula, for appellant.

H. Rodger Wilder, Eaton & Cottrell, Gulfport, for appellee.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED ON $12,067.00 DAMAGES; REVERSED AND RENDERED ON $919.25 JUDGMENT; AND AFFIRMED ON CROSS-APPEAL.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.

GRIFFIN, J., not participating.
#### STATE ex rel. Tracy LEE v. Hon. John B. WHITAKER, Judge, Tenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Natchitoches.

No. 88-KH-1050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Lee, Tracy; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of *1060Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 85-3653.

Denied. Appeal pending.
Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
Andre' DiMino, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of
the Company for the periods presented.

Date:  December 9, 2005               /s/ Andre' DiMino
                                          Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure
document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of
this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and will be retained by ADM Tronics
Unlimited, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2







                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report of Allion Healthcare, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Broughan E. Gorey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Allion
     Healthcare, Inc.

Dated:  April 15, 2003

                                                     /S/ BROUGHAN E. GOREY
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Broughan E. Gorey
                                                    Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com 

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

September 26, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Section 333 Petition for Exemption, Exemption No. 

12363 pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. 

Part 11

Dear Sir or Madam:

Brewster Fresh Produce filed for a Petition for Exemption/Rulemaking, Pursuant to 

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and Reform Act 

of 2012 (FMRA) 49 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, for the purposes of 

controlled, low-risk, precision commercial agriculture-related services over certain areas 

of the United States. 

The docket number for this petition is Docket No. FAA–2016–4931. The original 

petition lists the original 200 foot altitude limitation instead of the current 400 foot altitude

limitation. UASolutions Group, Inc., on behalf of Brewster Fresh Produce, hereby 

requests to amend Docket No. FAA–2016–4931 from the 200 foot altitude restriction 

listed in the original petition to the current accepted 400 foot altitude restriction. 

As this is an amendment asking for only a correction of an incorrect altitude to 

comply with current regulations, UASolutions Group, Inc., on behalf of Brewster Fresh 

Produce respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be 

published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this 

request for an amendment. 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com 

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7489

MARIO BALLARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CHAIRMAN, VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-01-235-7)

Submitted: December 20, 2001 Decided: January 9, 2002

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Mario Ballard, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Ballard appeals from the district court’s orders denying

his motion for a preliminary injunction, his numerous motions for

reconsideration, and his motion for a certificate of appealability.

Ballard’s appeal is untimely as to the order denying his motion for

a preliminary injunction and the July 10, 2001, order denying his

June 7, 2001, motion for reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a);

Kraft, Inc. v. United States, 85 F.3d 602, 605 (Fed. Cir.) (holding

that, following initial Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion tolling appeal

period, successive motions periods are not permitted), modified on

other grounds, 96 F.3d 1428 (Fed. Cir. 1996); accord EEOC v. Cent.

Motor Lines, Inc., 537 F.2d 1162, 1165 (4th Cir. 1976). We find

that Ballard’s appeal from the denial of the remaining orders

states no grounds for relief. United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d

310, 313 (4th Cir. 1982) (finding no grounds for relief where

motion for reconsideration raises no new arguments, seeks only reconsideration of legal issue, or asks court to “change its mind”).

Consequently, we dismiss in part and affirm in part. Ballard’s

Petition for Hearing En Banc is denied. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART
EXHIBIT 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60865) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 1997 Stock Option Plan
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68583)
pertaining to the Friction Products Co.  Profit Sharing Plan; S.K.
Wellman Retirement Savings and Profit Sharing Plan, Helsel, Inc.
Employees
Retirement Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employees Savings and
Investment Plan; Sinterloy Corporation 401(k) Plan; Hawk Motors,
Inc. Employees 401(k) Plan; Hawk
Corporation 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan; and Quarter Master Industries, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan and Trust
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47220) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-147832) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-152845) pertaining to the Amended and Restated Hawk Corporation 2000 Long Term Incentive Plan
#### Helen Moran MASHON, et al. v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., et al.

No. 87-CC-0224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Great Atlantic/Pacif. Tea; Cali, Dominick; Ernest, Henry; Gasparecz, Fred; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 73136; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW/86/1627.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-738]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7756]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Cult of Beauty: The Victorian Avant-Garde, 1860-
1900''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Cult of Beauty: The Victorian Avant-
Garde, 1860-1900,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, San 
Francisco, CA from on or about February 18, 2012, until on or about 
June 17, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 9, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-738 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
I, David Mitchell, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Macquarie Infrastructure Company Trustand Macquarie Infrastructure Company LLC (the “registrant”).;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 16, 2005     /s/ David Mitchell   David Mitchell Chief Financial Officer