alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**C2
      GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES INC.**





**OFFICER’S
      CERTIFICATION**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. 1350)**





The
      undersigned Allan C. Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of C2 Global
      Technologies Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection with
      the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
      December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the
      best
      of his knowledge:





1.  The
      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Corporation.





March
      16,
      2007


/s/
              Allan C. SilberAllan
                SilberChairman
                of the Board and Chief Executive
                Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0352

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GARREN DOUGLAS SEAL,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 12, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 3 2023

05/03/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0352
Exhibit 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated June 11, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Frontier Media, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of New Frontier Media, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-26479, effective May 5, 1997; File No. 333-92081,
effective December 3, 1999; File No. 333-57554, effective March 23, 2001; File No. 333-102694, effective January 24, 2003; and File
No. 333-147314, effective November 13, 2007) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-75733, effective on August 13, 1999; File
No. 333-90803, effective on November 22, 1999; and File No. 333-64786, effective on August 7, 2001).

/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Denver, Colorado
June 11, 2010

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of BG  Financial  Group,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, J.
Robert Grubbs,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                           /s/ J. Robert Grubbs
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Robert Grubbs
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           August 13, 2004
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.47 MB)
 
 Train USecAF ACTIVE DUTY undersecretary of the Air Force Matthew Donovan Department of the Air Force organize equp provide Welfare AF reserve Guard AIR FORCE SecAF Heather Wilson Secretary of the Air Force
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of HyperSpaceCommunications, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theaccompanying Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSBof the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the “*Report*”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|               | /s/  Mark Pougnet        |
|--------------------|--------------------------|
| July 19, 2005 | Mark  Pougnet            |
|               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IL/RESEARCH

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND VELA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

NORB MURPHY; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 06-17178

D.C. No. CV-04-00491-LRH/VPC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Vela appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

with prejudice his diversity action challenging State Farm Life Insurance

FILED

JAN 12 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IL/RESEARCH 2

Company, Inc.’s (“State Farm” ) refusal to pay a claim. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Townsel v.

Contra Costa County, Cal., 820 F.2d 319, 320 (9th Cir. 1987), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action

because Vela did not properly serve State Farm under either California or Nevada

law. See Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 415.30 (requiring that service by mail be

accompanied by a notice and acknowledgment of service); § 416.10 (requiring that

personal service on a corporation be on its designated agent for service of process

or on a corporate officer or other specified principal); Nev. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(1),

4(d)(2) (requiring service on an in-state officer or other authorized individual or on

the Nevada Secretary of State). Moreover, Vela failed to carry his burden under

federal law to prove that he delivered a copy of the summons and the complaint to

an individual authorized to receive it on State Farm’s behalf under Rule 4(h)(1) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Butcher’s Union Local 498, United

Food and Commercial Workers v. SDC Investment, Inc., 788 F.2d 535, 538 (9th

Cir. 1986) (explaining that plaintiff bears the burden of establishing that proper

service was effected).

AFFIRMED.
#### Earnest Warren LOFTICE v. Sharon Burleigh LOFTICE.

No. 87-C-0714.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Loftice, Earnest Warren; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA-86-1016; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 53126.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 1199.

Denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1031EM

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Jeffrey Todd Blackwell, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: July 14, 1998

Filed: October 8, 1998 

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Todd Blackwell pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50

grams or more of crack and to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The district

court sentenced Blackwell as a career offender to concurrent prison terms and

supervised release. Blackwell appeals his conviction and sentence. Counsel filed a

brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Blackwell filed a pro se

brief.

We reject counsel's argument that the district court abused its discretion in

refusing to allow Blackwell to withdraw his guilty plea because Blackwell
-2-

misunderstood the prison sentences he faced. When the district court properly informs

a defendant of the maximum statutory penalties, as it did here, counsel's mistaken

estimation of a defendant's sentence is not a fair and just reason to withdraw a guilty

plea and does not render the plea involuntary. See United States v. Bond, 135 F.3d

1247, 1248-49 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 1998 W. 289850 (U.S. June 26,

1998) (No. 97-9277).

We also reject Blackwell's pro se arguments. Blackwell was properly sentenced

as a career offender based on his earlier drug and burglary convictions. See U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1. (1997); United States v. Reynolds, 116 F.3d

328, 329-30 (8th Cir. 1997). Additionally, we conclude the district court's drugquantity determination is not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Hiveley, 61 F.3d

1358, 1362 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (standard of review). Blackwell stipulated in

his plea agreement that the substance in his possession was crack, and he also

stipulated the money in his possession was drug proceeds. Finally, we decline to

consider Blackwell's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. See

United States v. Brant, 113 F.3d 127, 128 (8th Cir. 1997).

After careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm Blackwell's conviction and

sentence.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Christine Sallese, Wife of/and Merle E. LEIKER v. J.J. KREBS & SONS, INC. and Anthony L. Golemi Contractor, Inc. ANTHONY L. GOLEMI, CONTRACTOR, INC. v. J.J. KREBS & SONS, INC. and XYZ Insurance Company.

No. 87-C-1110.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re J.J. Krebs & Sons, Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the *73Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 86-CA-0743, 86-CA-0744; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 294-850, 295-356.

Denied.

CALOGERO, MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BGFinancial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, T. Don Waddell, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

                (2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   |   |   | /s/ T. Don Waddell      |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | T. Don Waddell          |
|   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |   |   | May 16, 2005            |
|   |   |   |   |                    |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
#### Tammaye RACHAL v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

No. 87-C-1291.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Transportation & Dév.,- Dept, of; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-0380; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 124053.

Prior report: La.App., 505 So.2d 999.

Denied.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ.,

concur. The judgment is definitive as to defendant’s liability, inasmuch as defendant’s devolutive appeal was dismissed prior to oral argument.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 JANUARY 20, 2010

JOHN LEY

ACTING CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-11414

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 97-00098-CR-T-27TGW

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERIC S. HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(January 20, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, BIRCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mary A. Mills, appointed counsel for Eric S. Harris in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Harris’s conviction and

sentence is AFFIRMED.

2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-20320

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SYLVESTER LEON WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:01-CR-916-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Sylvester Leon Wright on

appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Wright has not filed a response. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, the
undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stanley
P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

              A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.

                              /s/ Allen S. Greene
                              ----------------------
                                 Allen S. Greene
                             Chief Executive Officer

                             /s/ Stanley P. Wirtheim
                             -----------------------
                               Stanley P. Wirtheim
                             Chief Financial Officer

August 8, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7825

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARCUS OWEN WHITE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (2:01-cr-00091-HCM; 2:05-cv-378)

Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 5, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus Owen White, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Marcus Owen White seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that White has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED