alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

s1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145448

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 145448

ADB: 11

- 0000 56

- GA

JOHN A. LYGIZOS,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed

by this Court.
1

ATTACHMENT 3

Red Line and Strike Out Version of GHG Mitigation Measures TSD Excerpts 

1) Pages 3-6, 3-8, 4-4, 4-19 – Revised website address for all references to IPM modeling data 

to: http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/powersectormodeling.html. 

2) Revised language and footnote in Chapter 2 on heat rate improvement (HRI) as follows:

a) Sec 2.5.2.2 – Deleted “ambient air (primary air) is mixed with fuel prior to 

combustion and a fraction of” from “Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat 

rate in three ways: (1) ambient air (primary air) is mixed with fuel prior to 

combustion and a fraction of energy released during combustion heats the incoming 

air, ...,” to read “Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat rate in three ways: (1) 

energy released during combustion heats the incoming air,....”

Ambient air temperature can affect gross heat rate in three ways: (1) ambient air (primary air) is 

mixed with fuel prior to combustion and a fraction of energy released during combustion heats 

the incoming air, (2) in many regions of the country temperature affects electricity demand and, 

as a result, some....

b) Page 2-57 – Corrected final footnote:“See supra 9395”.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 of the MacroShares $100 Oil Up Trust (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, John A. Flanagan, principal financial officer of MACRO Securities Depositor, LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the "Depositor"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: November 14, 2008

| |                                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ John A. Flanagan                                          
| | John A. Flanagan                                              
| | Chief Financial Officer of Depositor, 
on behalf of Registrant
CCA # 13-14-00292-CR

Melvin Monroe Brigham v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURTS:

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon. Randy Clapp

DISPOSITION: Affirm

DATE:

JUSTICE:

PUBLISH:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR:

APP BR:

329th District Court

19,099

_ PC.

DNP:

Hlo-iS

Failure to Register as a Sex

OFFENSE: Offender

COUNTY: Wharton

FOR REHEARING IS:.

DATE: 3/5/15

JUDGE: Garza

SUPPCLKRECORD.

SUPPRPTRECORD.

SUPPBR

PROSE BR

MOTION

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

PRO SE Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: Ot/oZ/u/r

JUDGE:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

^A fouLtsfr*-^

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON •

CCA# vao'/s*

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:46 PM

To: Ogulei, David Subject: FW: another one

From: Bivins, Dan

Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:57 PM

To: John Cooper

Cc: Garnett, Kim Subject: another one



### #48 Comment: OTM 16 and 20 are site-specific methods and ar e not applicable to Veolia’s operations. OTM 16 and 20 were written specifically for Eli Lilly and Co.’s (Lilly) source and instrument. While they would provide a starting place for another facility to develop their own site-specific method, one cannot assume that

either could be used at another f acility without significant modification. For example, the sample transport system in OTM 16 provides for a protocol for including the sample transport system into the instrument validation using either dynamic spiking of known gase s or comparison to another method (instrumental or reference, M29, filters/tubes and Ohio Luminex, etc.). This was written specifically for the Lilly system using a Sigrist sampling system. It is not at all clear that an appropriate sample transport system could be designed and developed for Veolia’s stack gas conditions. Lilly spent considerable time and resources in developing both the laboratory and stack data underlying thes e methods. It is also not clear whet her this instrument would tie into Veolia’s daily operations, alarms, and QA/QC procedur es. It is likely that th ese two OTMs would need extensive work before they would be usab le for the conditions in Veolia’s stack.

In addition, there is a good chance that the current QAG w ill not be able to produce quantitative mass of metals in the ranges required to calibrate/t est the Xact. The QAG operates as a dynamic spiking into the probe/sample loop of the Xact system. Operation of this unit is dependent on the type of probe used, the flow in the sample loop, and gas conditions. Lilly spent a year developing this device to present the mass of metals specific to its sample loop (flow/moisture, etc.).

Dan Bivins U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Measurement Technology Group

919-541-5244
Exhibit
10.11


 


Sichuan
Wetouch Technology Co., Ltd


 


Supplemental
Agreement to the Sales Framework Agreement


 


Party
A: Sichuan Wetouch Technology Co., Ltd


 


Party
B:


 


Sichuan
Wetouch Technology Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Party A) and __________________ (hereafter referred to as Party B) entered
into a Sales Framework Agreement on ___________, 2018. Based on the mutual benefits and long-term cooperation, both parties agreed
to enter into this Supplemental Agreement to the Sales Framework Agreement (“Supplemental Agreement) with the terms as follows:


 


1.
If the purchase amount of Party B from Party A in 2019 exceeds RMB _____ (or $_______) , Party A shall give Party B a concession
of 5% of the purchase amount in 2019. If the purchase amount in 2019 fails to reach RMB _____ (or $_______), no concession will
be granted.


 


2.
This Supplementary Agreement shall come into force upon being signed and sealed by both parties.


 


3.
This Supplementary Agreement is made in duplicate, with each party holding one copy.


 


	Party
    A:Sichuan Wetouch Technology Co., Ltd 	Party
    B: 
	 	 
	Legal
    representative: 	Legal
    representative:
	 	 
	Date:
    	Date:
AP-77,051

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 8/4/2015 12:53:36 PM

Accepted 8/4/2015 1:18:32 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

NO. AP-77,051

On Appeal from the 228th Judicial District Court of

Harris County, Texas ••( Ps A n

in Cause Number 0475122 '*fV ^^P

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS

August 4, 2015

ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK

oirfOKsJraJ?

WARREN D. RIVERS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

UNOPPOSED

APPELLANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Warren D. Rivers, Appellant herein, by and through his

attorney of record, Patrick McCann, and files this, his Second Motion for Extension of

Time. In support ofsaid motion, Appellant would show the Court the following:

1. Counsel has just filed a death Certificate of Appealability in the Fifth Circuit on

August 3rd in Norn's v. Stephens. The appellee's brief in that same case is due on

September 2nd.

2. Counsel's continuance of a federal medicare fraud case in United States v.

Tsolak Gregoryan was denied upon government objection, and the federal

district court judge reinstated the August 19th trial date so we are now headed

to jury trial in this matter beginning August 19th. Counsel must prepare to

represent his client in this very complex fraud case.

3. Counsel is also preparing for a non-death capital trial in State ofTexas v. Rene

Lopez m. the 180th district court.

4. Counsel had originally requested a longer extension of time in his first

application and now requests 90 days as per his original request.

1
5. This is a retrial on punishment for death and the record is extensive. Given the

size of the record and the complexity of the issues for briefing, the additional

time is necessary for a full and fair defense of Mr. Rivers.

6. This extension is sought in the interest of justice and not for delay.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant respectfully requests that

this Court grant his Second Motion for Extension of Time.

Respectfully submitted,

The Law Offices of Patrick McCann

By: /s/Patrick F. McCann

Patrick F. McCann

SBN: 00792680

909 Texas Avenue, Suite 205

Houston, Texas 77002

Phone: (713)223-3805

eFax: (281) 667-3352

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on August 4th, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and

foregoing document was served on:

Mr. Alan Curry

Chief Prosecutor, Appellate Division

Harris County District Attorney's Office

1201 Franklin Street, Ste. 600

Houston, TX 77002-1923

Via e-Filing Pro-Doc CourtesyCopyService: Curry Alan(S)dao.hctx.net

By: /s/Patrick F. McCann

Patrick F. McCann
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 200 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 200

  Designating the week of February 14-20 as ``National Biotechnology 
                                Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 1999

Mr. Grams submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating the week of February 14-20 as ``National Biotechnology 
                                Week''.

Whereas biotechnology is increasingly important to the research and development 
        of medical, agricultural, industrial, and environmental products;
Whereas biotechnology has been responsible for breakthroughs and achievements 
        which have benefited people for centuries and, in the 20th century, has 
        contributed to increasing the lifespan of Americans by 25 years through 
        the development of vaccines, antibiotics, and other drugs;
Whereas biotechnology is central to research for cures to diseases such as 
        cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, heart and lung disease, 
        Alzheimer's disease, Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and 
        innumerable other medical ailments;
Whereas biotechnology contributes to crop yields and farm productivity and 
        enhances the quality, value, and suitability of crops for food and other 
        uses which are critical to America's agricultural system;
Whereas biotechnology promises environmental benefits including protection of 
        water quality, conservation of topsoil, improvement of waste management 
        techniques, and reduction of chemical pesticide usage;
Whereas biotechnology contributes to the success of the United States in 
        international commerce and trade;
Whereas biotechnology will be an important catalyst for creating jobs in the 
        21st century; and
Whereas it is important for all Americans to understand the role biotechnology 
        contributes to their quality of life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of February 14-20 of the year 2000 
        as ``National Biotechnology Week''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe this week 
        with appropriate programs, ceremonies, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 347

Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000,

as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 2000

Ms. LANDRIEU (for herself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Ms. COLLINS,

Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. BOXER, Mrs. LINCOLN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Ms. SNOWE,

and Mr. HATCH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 15, 2000

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000, as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness

Week.

Whereas 1 out of every 55 women will develop ovarian cancer

at some point during her life;

Whereas over 70 percent of women with ovarian cancer will

not be diagnosed until ovarian cancer has spread beyond

the ovary;

Whereas prompt diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial to effective treatment, with the chances of curing the disease

before it has spread beyond the ovaries ranging from 85
2

SRES 347 ATS

to 90 percent, as compared to between 20 and 25 percent

after the cancer has spread;

Whereas several easily identifiable factors, particularly a family history of ovarian cancer, can help determine how susceptible a woman is to developing the disease;

Whereas effective early testing is available to women who

have a high risk of developing ovarian cancer;

Whereas heightened public awareness can make treatment of

ovarian cancer more effective for women who are at-risk;

and

Whereas the Senate, as an institution, and members of Congress, as individuals, are in unique positions to help raise

awareness about the need for early diagnosis and treatment for ovarian cancer: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates the week of September 17, 2000,

3 through September 23, 2000, as National Ovarian

4 Cancer Awareness Week; and

5 (2) requests that the President issue a procla6 mation calling upon the people of the United States

7 to observe National Ovarian Cancer Awareness

8 Week with appropriate recognition and activities.

Æ
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN

NO. 03-00-00697-CR

The State of Tex as, Appellant

v. Adam Gomez, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLI AMSON COUN TY NO. 99-5564-1, HONORAB LE KEVIN HENDERS ON, JUDGE PRESIDING
PER CURIAM

The State seeks

to appeal an order gr anting appellee Adam Gome z’s motion to suppress evidence. See Tex. Code Cr im. Pr oc. Ann. art. 44. 01(a)(5) (West Supp. 2000). The clerk’s recor d ref

lects that th e motion t o suppr ess w as gran ted in open court on September 18, 2000. The written or der was signed on October 2, 2000. The State’s notice of appeal was filed on October 20, 2000.

“ The prosecuting attorney may not make an appeal underSubsection (a) or (b) of this art ic le la ter th an th e 1 5t h day af ter th e d at e o n w hi ch th e o rde r, r uling, or sente nce to be appealed is ente red by the court. ” Id
. art. 44. 01(d). “ [T]he term ‘entered by the c ourt’ [in article 44. 01(d)] encompasses the signing of an order by the trial judge. ” State v. Rosenbaum , 818 S. W. 2d 398, 402 (Tex. C rim. App. 1991). The fifteenth day after t he order in this cause was signed by the trial court was October 17, 2000. The State’s substantive right to appeal expir ed2

after that date. State v. Demaret , 764 S. W. 2d 857, 858 (Tex. App.

—

Aust in 198 9, no pe t. ); see also State v. Muller , 829 S
. W. 2d 805 , 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)
.

The State d id not perfect ap peal before its right to appea l expired. Under th e circumstances, we must dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

B efore Justices Jones, Kidd and Yeakel Dismissed for Want of Jur isdiction F iled: Do N ot Pu blish
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1031EM

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Jeffrey Todd Blackwell, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: July 14, 1998

Filed: October 8, 1998

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Todd Blackwell pleaded guilty to possessing with intent to distribute 50 grams or mor e of crack and to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The distric t court sentenced Blackwell as a career offender to concurrent prison terms an d supervised release. Blackwell appeals his conviction and sentence. Counsel filed a brie f under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Blackwell filed a pro s e brief.
We reject counsel's argument that the district court abused its discretion i n refusing to allow Blackwell to withdraw his guilty plea because Blackwell-2-

misunderstood the prison sentences he faced. Whe n the district court properly informs a d efendant of the maximum statutory penalties, as it did here, counsel's mistake n estimationof a defendant's sentence is not a fair and just reason to withdraw a guilty plea and do es not render the plea involuntary. See United States v. Bond , 135 F.3 d 1247 , 1248-49 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied , 1998 W. 289850 (U.S. June 26 , 1998) (No. 97-9277). We also reject Blackwell's pro se arguments. Blackwell was properly sentenced as a career o ffender based on his earlier drug and burglary convictions. See U.S
. Sente ncing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1. (1997); United States v. Reynolds , 116 F.3d 328, 329-30 (8th Cir. 1997). Additionally, we conclude the district court's drug

quantity determination is not clearly erroneous
. See United States v. Hiveley , 61 F.3d 1358, 1362 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (standard of review). Blackwell stipulated in his plea agr eement that the substance in his possession was crack, and he als o stipu latedthe money in his possession was drug proceeds. Finally, we decline t o consider Blackwell's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. See United States v. Brant , 113 F.3d 127, 128 (8th Cir. 1997). After careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. Se e Pensonv. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We thus affirm Blackwell's conviction and sentence. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### COIN COPIES, INC., Appellant, v. FINANCIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND, LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 87-802.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 13, 1987.

Henry W. Ciar, Miami, for appellant.

*791Shapiro, Rose & Fishman, North Miami, and Robert J. Nemrow, Miami, for appel-

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed on the authority of *Boyd v. Banc One Mortgage Corp.,*509 So.2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
Exhibit 10.2








Purchase and Sales Contract


Seller: Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.(hereinafter Party A)


Contract No.: 20100219Signing Site: Sishui County, Shandong ProvinceSigning Date: 19 February 2010
 Buyer: Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter Party B)


I. By virtue of the friendly cooperation, mutual development and mutual benefit and after full consultations and negotiations, Party A and Party B reached the following agreements. Therefore, both parties draw up this contract and conclude it.


II. Product Name, Model & Unit Price


Product Name

Specification

mode

Unit of

measurement

Unit price

RemarkDrug magnetic pillow

1×1

Set

39.00Health ginkgo tea

1×40

Box

9.02Ginkgo tea

1×20

Box

4.50Health-ganoderma capsule

1×80

Box

28.00Protein essence capsule

1×80

Box

28.00Essence of Chinese wolfberry-capsule

1×120

Box

20.00Bitter gourd capsule

1×8 boxes

Box

20.00Active calcium

1×60 tablets/box

Box

9.00Cactus Kangyuan tablets

1×200

Box

20.00Lvbao spirulina tablets

1×200

Box

18.00


III. Quality standard: in compliance with the enterprise standard approved by the local technical supervision.


III. Mode of delivery: Party B picks up the goods from the warehouse of Party A.


IV. The outer packaging is canton box and the packing materials are not recyclable. The charges of the packing are borne by Party A.


V. Acceptance standard, method and the time limit for objection: The acceptance of the goods will be conducted in the warehouse of Party A. The objections can be raised within six months.










Exhibit 10.2





VI. Terms of payment and the time limit: The terms of payment is that both parties settle the payment for goods based on the certified bill of lading at the end of every month. For the balance payment which are not settled, Party B will charge a penalty at 3‰ from the first day of the next month.


VII. The way to settle the dispute of contract: Any issue not specified in this contract shall be settled through friendly negotiation. In case no settlement is reached, this dispute shall be settled in the court or the arbitral organization where Party A is located.


VIII. This contract will be valid from 1 March 2010 to 28 February 2015.


IX. This contract is made in two copies. Each party keeps one.





The seller:

Name of company(seal):

Address of company:

Legal representative:

Authorized representative:

Tel:

Bank of deposit:

Account:

Postcode:

The buyer:

Name of company(seal):

Address of company:

Legal representative:

Authorized representative:

Tel:

Bank of deposit:

Account:

Postcode:








Special seal for contractof Shandong Yongchuntang Biologic Science & Technology Co., Ltd.











Special seal for contract of Shandong Spring Medicine Co., Ltd.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, August 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24A1766. ERVIN WILSON v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On July 29, 2024, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a

brief no later than August 08, 2024. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).