CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Placer County Air Pollution Control District

Rule No(s): 213 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended

Rule Title(s): Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Con tainers

Date Submitted to ARB:

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 10/19/93

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Conta ct: Don Duffy Phone Number: (530)745

- 2336 E

- mail Address: dduffy@placer.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The primary reason for amending the rule at this time is to add requirements for Standing Loss Control (SLC) to

make it enforceable by the District. SLC is enhanced vapor recovery for aboveground tanks required by ARB

Executive Orders VR

- 301 and VR

- 302. An e xemption has been added to the white paint requirement of SLC for

large tanks employing thermal oxidizers for pressure management.

While the rule was open, the rule format was updated to current District standards, a definition was added for

"CARB Certifi ed", and some definitions and references were updated to current usage.

EPA commented on calling out the use of CARB test methods specified in the Executive Orders, saying the test

methods should be listed by name and number. This change was incorporated

.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name): Benzine

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Com plete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach reference (s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category:

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Change s in Emissions: Area Affected:

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RU LE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure:

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure:

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any):

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed):

Note that the distri

ct’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 209

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 95 %

Number of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 2 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 1 00 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : PABCO, Gladding McBean, Lincoln, Placer Co.

Sierra Pacific Industries, Lincoln, Placer Co.

IV. EMISSIO N REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 3.1 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Require CARB certified equipment

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 3.1 Work Practice Standards in Section(s):

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 4.1 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 4.1CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

-- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainmen t

Discussion: No impact on the air quality plan because Standing Loss Control already required by CARB Executive Orders

and emission reductions accounted for in the air quality plan.