alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEIVE[0 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION DEC 11 2013 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. HEARING DOCKEr 

IN THE MATTER OF NORTHEASTERN AVIATION CORP. 

Case No. 2012EA110030 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1264 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE 

THE CLERK OF THE COURT will please enter the appearance of Edward J. Longosz, 

II, Esquire and Evelyn D. Sahr, Esquire, from the law firm of Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, 

LLC and withdraw the appearance of James G. Ehrig, Esquire as counsel for Respondent in the 

above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN 

& MELLOTT, LLC 

Edward J. Longosz)I, Esquire 

Evelyn D. Sahr, Esquire 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Suite 1200 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

(202) 659-6622 

(202) 659-6699 (fax) 

elongosz@eckertseamans.com 

esahr@eckertseamans.com 

Attorneys for Respondent 

Northeastern Aviation Corp. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on December 9, 2013 the foregoing Notice of Substitution of 

Counsel and Entry of Appearance has been served via Federal Express and facsimile to the 

following: 

Mr. Alfred R. Johnson, Jr., Esq. 

Mr. Zachary M. Berman, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Telephone: 718-553-3258 

Fax: 718-995-5699 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

(Federal Express only) 

I hereby certify that on December 9, 2013 the foregoing Notice of Substitution of 

Counsel and Entry of Appearance has been served via Federal Express to the following: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Room 2014 

Paralegal
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Face-to-Face Service Methods Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 14, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Powers at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (954) 423-7977.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Face-to-Face Service Methods Project Committee will be held Tuesday, February 14, 2012, at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact Ms. Powers at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (954) 423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS Issues.

Dated: January 11, 2012.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-761 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 202

Recognizing the distinguished service of John E. Cook of Williams, Arizona.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13, 1999

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the distinguished service of John E. Cook of

Williams, Arizona.

Whereas John E. Cook has recently retired from the National

Park Service after 43 years of distinguished service to

the United States and the people of the western region

of the Nation;

Whereas John E. Cook most recently served 87 park units

in 8 western States, stretching from the Canadian border

to Mexico, as Director of the Intermountain Region of

the National Park Service;

Whereas John E. Cook is in the third of 4 generations from

the Cook family who have served the National Park Service with enthusiasm and dedication;

Whereas John E. Cook’s father, John O. Cook, and his

grandfather, John E. Cook, served the National Park
2

•SRES 202 ATS

Service in the southwestern region, and his daughter

Kayci Cook, currently serves as superintendent of Fort

McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in

Baltimore;

Whereas John E. Cook began his National Park Service career as a mule skinner at what is now Saguaro National

Park;

Whereas John E. Cook, who is of Cherokee descent, speaks

Navajo, and has worked diligently to promote Native

American understanding;

Whereas John E. Cook has held 4 regional directorships, 1

deputy regional directorship, and 5 superintendencies

within the National Park Service, and has proven to be

a strong manager of people and parks, linking cultural

and natural resource management; and

Whereas the citizens of the United States and the National

Park Service owe John E. Cook a debt of gratitude and

wish to congratulate him on his well-deserved retirement:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) congratulates John E. Cook for 43 years of

3 service to the National Park Service;

4 (2) acknowledges the admiration and affection

5 that John E. Cook’s friends share for him; and

6 (3) recognizes the pride and high standard of

7 workmanship exhibited by John E. Cook for 43

8 years.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata 

SHAWN McCAULEY 

v. Record No. 2587-09-3 

JESSICA HOOVER 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

SHAWN McCAULEY PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 1, 2010 

v. Record No. 2588-09-3 

 

JESSICA HOOVER 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ROCKINGHAM COUNTY 

James V. Lane, Judge 

 (W. Andrew Harding; Eldridge, Elledge, Evans & Harding, PLC, on 

briefs), for appellant. Appellant submitting on briefs. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Shawn McCauley is currently incarcerated at the Augusta Correctional Center. Prior to a 

hearing regarding visitation with his two minor children, ages five and three, McCauley filed a 

motion for transportation in the Rockingham County Circuit Court (trial court). He sought to testify 

before the trial court to explain why he should be permitted visitation with his children while 

incarcerated, as well as why Jessica Hoover, the children’s mother, should not retain discretion over 

decisions of visitation for the children. The trial court reviewed McCauley’s proffer outlining the 

nature of the testimony he would give if permitted to testify. It determined McCauley’s guardian ad 

litem was capable of adequately addressing his concerns at trial, and denied his motion for 

transportation on October 8, 2009. This appeal followed. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

 Code § 8.01-410 provides, in pertinent part: 

Whenever any party in a civil action in any circuit court in this 

Commonwealth requires as a witness in his behalf, an inmate in a 

state or local correctional facility as defined in § 53.1-1, the court, 

on the application of such party or his attorney may, in its 

discretion and upon consideration of the importance of the 

personal appearance of the witness and the nature of the offense 

for which he is imprisoned, issue an order to the Director of the 

Department of Corrections to deliver such witness to the sheriff of 

the jurisdiction of the court issuing the order. 

(Emphasis added.) “‘[A] trial court’s discretionary ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent a 

clear abuse of discretion.’” Guill v. Commonwealth, 255 Va. 134, 146, 495 S.E.2d 489, 496 

(1998) (quoting Coe v. Commonwealth, 231 Va. 83, 87, 340 S.E.2d 820, 823 (1986)). 

 In this case, the trial court reviewed McCauley’s proffer, concluded McCauley’s presence 

would not aid the decisional process, and found that the guardian ad litem’s testimony was 

sufficient to rule on the issue of visitation. From the evidence before us, we cannot conclude the 

trial court abused its discretion in reaching its conclusion. As such, we affirm the decision of the 

trial court. 

 Affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION





The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on From 10-K of Israel
Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended
October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the
Registrant.




Dated:
      December 14, 2010
                /s/
      Mitchell MetzmanMitchell
      MetzmanChief
      Financial Officer
---

AMENDED SCHEDULE “A”

Amended as of the 30th day of September, 2004.

Employee

|Salary:         | $114,000 per annum                                                                          
|--------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                |                                                                                             
|Holidays:       | Three weeks per annum                                                                       
|                |                                                                                             
|Entities:       | None                                                                                        
|                |                                                                                             
|Other Benefits: | Medical, dental, AD&D and
        life insurance coverage provided to all senior management.

DYNAMIC OIL & GAS, INC.

Per:

| | /s/ Wayne Babcock    |  |                          
| | -------------------- |  | -------------------------
| | Authorized Signatory |  |                          
| |                      |  |                          
| | /s/ Michael Bardell  |  | /s/ Jonathan White       
| | Authorized Signatory |  | Jonathan White (Employee)

---
Need to return call by / at/between and

. Signature:

___________________________ Project No.: 0317.02.029.033 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: Steam Electric ELG 

### CBI?

Yes

x 

### No TELEPHONE CALL RECOR D Incoming

x Outgoing Date: 9/ 24/2015 Time: 1:00 am

x pm

Company Name: United Conveyor Corporation (UCC) ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Gentile

Contact Name: UCC Contact Phone Number: Conference Call

General Subject: Bottom Ash Complete Recycle

– Cost Estimates



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

On Thursday, September 24, 2015, I participated in a call with Ron Jordan, EPA, and UCC to discuss bottom ash complete recycle systems, specifically remote mechanical drag systems (MDS). UCC explained that typically a surge tank, return water pumps, and piping would be required to recycle bottom ash transport water

from the remote MDS back to the boiler to eliminate the discharge of bottom ash transport water. UCC provided the following capital cost estimates for the equipment:

- Surge tank: $250,000

- $500,000

- Set of r eturn water pumps and associated controls : $1,000,000 to $2,000,000 ( depends on quantity of units, desired level of redundancy, conveying system distance)

- Carbon steel return piping (and miscellaneous hardware): $50,000

- $100,000 (can vary depending on quantity of units, desired level of redundancy, conveying system distance )

UCC explained that typically the plant would install one surge tank, one set of return water pumps, and carbon steel return piping (listed above) for each set of two remote MDS trains installed at the plant. Therefore, for every two remote MDS installat ion s, the capital cost incurred for the equipment listed above would be approximately $2,500,000, with an estimated installation cost of $5,000,000 (total $7,500,000).

Further, UCC explained that there are two key components in determining the number of re mote MDS installations required at a plant: sluice flow rate (in gallons per minute) and the number of sluice conveying lines that transport bottom ash from the generating units . UCC provided the following rule of thumb for estimating the numb er of recommended remote MDS installations for a plant based on the number of generating

units and an equivalent quantity of sluice conveying lines :

- 1 generating unit: 1 or 2 remote MDS installations

- 2 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 3 generating units: 2 remote MDS installations

- 4 generating units: 2

- 3 remote MDS installations

- 5 generating units: 3

- 4 remote MDS installations

- >5 generating units: depends on quantity of sluice conveying lines

UCC noted that the number of generating units at the plant may not dictate the total number of remote MDS

installations if the plant has a different number of sluice lines than generating units. For example, some plants operate one or two sluicing lines for more than two generating units.

In a follow up conversation on 9/25/2015 , I asked UCC about the estimated O&M costs. UCC stated that costs

are “ estimated $50

- $100K additional O&M costs, but this is a very rough estimate at this time due to limited

data.”
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock
Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chien Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 
 
  Date: December
15, 2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ Chien
Chih Liu
 By: Chien
Chih Liu, Chief
Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Roosevelt McGEE v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, or his Successor, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-1039.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re McGee, Roosevelt; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, habeas corpus, mandamus and remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C,” No. 253-297.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 125

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, June 29, 2000, Fri4 day, June 30, 2000, or on Saturday, July 1, 2000, on

5 a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

6 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

7 or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 10, 2000, or

8 until such time on that day as may be specified by its

9 Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

10 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members
2

SCON 125 ATS

1 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

2 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

3 when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thurs4 day, June 29, 2000, or Friday, June 30, 2000, on a mo5 tion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

6 Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until

7 12:30 p.m. on Monday, July 10, 2000, for morning-hour

8 debate, or until noon on the second day after Members

9 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2of this con10 current resolution, whichever occurs first.

11 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

12 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

13 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

14 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen15 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

16 this opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0663

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

JOSEPH EUGENE GARCIA,

 Defendant and Appellant,

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 5, 2024, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 8 2024

02/08/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0663
#### Sonya MICHL, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and Gray Stores, Inc., Appellees/Cross-appellants.

No. 87-755.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

June 21, 1988.

Kirkpatrick & Lockhart and Jeffrey A. Tew and Robert B. Galt, III and Daniel A. Casey, Miami, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and FERGUSON,* JJ.

**Judge Ferguson did not participate in oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Sonya Michl raises several points on appeal. She maintains that the trial court erred in: failing to permit certain rebuttal testimony; refusing to permit introduction of correspondence between consumers and appellee General Electric Company; denying requested jury instructions; and limiting cross-examination of an expert witness. Finding no merit in these contentions, we affirm. *See Giordano v. Ramirez,*503 So.2d 947 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); *Riveron v. Jervis B. Webb Co.,*488 So.2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *Gencorp, Inc. v. Wolfe,*481 So.2d 109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), *review denied,*491 So.2d 281 (Fla.1986); *3-M Corp.*—McGhan *Medical Reports Div. v. Brown,*475 So.2d 994 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *Thomas v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.,*424 So.2d 36 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *Coral Plaza Corp. v. Hersman,*220 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA), *cert. denied,*229 So.2d 867 (Fla.1969); *see also Robison v. Faine,*525 So.2d 903, 905 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). *Cf. State, Dept. of Transportation*
      *1047
      *v. Alvarez,*490 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 3d DCA), *review denied,*500 So.2d 543 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 130

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Haiti should conduct free, fair,

transparent, and peaceful elections.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 1999

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. BIDEN, and Mr.

LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Haiti should conduct

free, fair, transparent, and peaceful elections.

Whereas Rene Preval was elected president of Haiti on December 17, 1995, and inaugurated on February 7, 1996;

Whereas a political impasse between President Preval and the

Haitian Parliament over the past 2 years has stalled

democratic development and contributed to the Haitian

people’s political disillusionment;

Whereas Haiti’s economic development is stagnant, living

conditions are deplorable, and democratic institutions

have yet to become effective;

Whereas Haiti’s political leaders propose free, fair, and transparent elections for local and national legislative bodies;

and
2

•SRES 130 IS

Whereas Haiti’s new independent Provisional Electoral Council has scheduled those elections for November and December 1999: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends the provisional Electoral Council

3 of Haiti for its decision to hold elections for 19 sen4 ate seats, providing for a transparent resolution of

5 the disputed 1997 elections;

6 (2) urges the Government of Haiti to actively

7 engage in dialogue with all elements of Haitian soci8 ety to further a self-sustainable democracy;

9 (3) encourages the Government and all political

10 parties in Haiti to proceed toward conducting free,

11 fair, transparent, and peaceful elections as sched12 uled, in the presence of domestic and international

13 observers, without pressure or interference;

14 (4) urges the Clinton Administration and the

15 international community to continue to play a posi16 tive role in Haiti’s economic and political develop17 ment;

18 (5) urges the United Nations to provide appro19 priate technical support for the elections and to

20 maximize the use of United Nations civilian police

21 monitors of the CIVPOL mission during the election

22 period;
3

•SRES 130 IS

1 (6) encourages the Clinton Administration and

2 the international community to provide all appro3 priate assistance for the coming elections;

4 (7) encourages the Government of Haiti to

5 adopt adequate security measures in preparation for

6 the proposed elections;

7 (8) urges all elements of Haitian civil society,

8 including the political leaders of Haiti, to publicly

9 renounce violence and promote a climate of security;

10 and

11 (9) urges the United States and other members

12 of the international community to continue support

13 toward a lasting and committed transition to democ14 racy in Haiti.

Æ