alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael P. Moran, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Allion Healthcare,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | /s/ Michael Moran                    
|                     |  | Michael P. Moran                     
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
| Name                                      |   | State      of Incorporation |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                                      |   |                        |
| ACRS      Local Communications Inc.       |   | Delaware                    |
| C2      Communications Technologies, Inc. |   | Delaware                    |
| C2      Investments Inc.                  |   | Delaware                    |
| I-Link      Systems Inc.                  |   | Utah                        |
| Mibridge      Inc.                        |   | Utah                        |
| WebtoTel      Inc.                        |   | Delaware                    |
| CPT-1      Holdings Inc.                  |   | Delaware                    |
| Counsel      RB Capital LLC               |   | Delaware                    |

----
#### Arthur E. Grannis, Appellant, *v.*John Stevens et al., Respondents.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided Febuary 29, 1916.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 216 N. Y. 583.)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A. G. AND K. G.,

CHILDREN

,

Appellant

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 1 62

- C V

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20 20DCM4548 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Muriel Montrose ’ s r equest for an extension of time within which to

file the Reporter ’ s Record until October 11 , 202 1

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED BY

THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Muriel Montrose

, Offic ial Court Reporter for the 65 th

Associate Court f or El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record and forward the sam e

to this Cou rt on or before October 11 , 202 1

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 30 th d ay of September , 20 2 1

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodrigu ez , C.J., Palafox, J., and Marion, C.J . (Ret.)

Marion, C. J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION********

 

I, Antonio Brufau Niubó, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Repsol YPF, S.A.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 30, 2005
#### STATE ex rel. Donald HOLLIS v. 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, State of Louisiana, et al.

No. 87-KH-0375.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 23, 1987.

In re Hollis, Donald; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 12-77-353.

Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not already done so, on the post conviction petition submitted on or about November 22, 1986, if it has been filed.
EXHIBIT 10.151

                  ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY
                     WITH NG MAN SUN DATED DECEMBER 29, 1995

                  ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF LIABILITY



         The undersigned corporation, NuOasis International,  Inc., a California
corporation,  hereby  assumes all  obligations on the part of Nona Morelli's II,
Inc.  as  Maker  of  that  certain  Secured  Contingent  Promissory  Note in the
principal  amount of $3,000,000  executed in favor of Ng Man Sun, doing business
as  Dragon  Sight  International   Amusement  (Macau)  Co.  (the  "Note").   The
undersigned  agrees  to be bound by all the  terms,  provisions,  covenants  and
conditions of the Note.

         The undersigned agrees to pay all expenses  (including  attorneys' fees
and legal  expenses)  paid or incurred by Ng Man Sun,  doing  business as Dragon
Sight International Amusement (Macau) Co. in endeavoring to collect the Note, or
any part thereof, and in enforcing this Assumption Agreement.

         If any provisions of this Assumption Agreement are in conflict with any
statute,  rule or law, then such provisions shall be deemed null and void to the
extent of such conflict,  but without  invalidating any other provisions of this
Assumption Agreement.



December 29, 1995                       NUOASIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
                                        a California corporation



                                        By:  /s/  Fred G. Luke
                                             ----------------------------------
                                                  Fred G. Luke, President


         The   undersigned,   Ng  Man  Sun,   doing  business  as  Dragon  Sight
International  Amusement  (Macau) Co., releases Nona Morelli's II, Inc. from all
liability on the part of Nona Morelli's II, Inc. to be performed under the Note.

                                        NG MAN SUN,  doing business
                                        as       Dragon       Sight
                                        International     Amusement
                                        (Macau) Co.



                                        /s/  Ng Man Sun
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                             Ng Man Sun



                                                        [NUOINTL\AGR:NGNOTE.AGR]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LEXINGTON INSURANCE §

COMPANY

, § No. 319 , 201 6

§

Defendant Below

- § Court Below: Superior Court

Appell ant, § of the State of Delaware

§

v. §

§

ALMAH LLC and SL GREEN §

REALTY CORPORATION, §

§

Plaintiff s Below

- §

Appellee s

. §

Submitted: June 21, 2016

Decided: June 28 , 201 6

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; HOLLAND and SEITZ

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 28th day of June 2016

, it appears to the Court that :

(1) We have before us an application for interlocutory review of a

Superior Court decision addressing cross

- motions for summary judgment in an

insura nce coverage dispute turning on issues of contract interpretation. The

appellant’s request is based on the Superior Court’s January 27, 2016

memorandum opinion and May 24, 2016 order denying the appellant’s motion for

reconsideration

. 1

1 Almah LLC v. Lexington Ins

. Co

. , 2016 WL 369576 (Del. Super. Jan. 27, 2016), rearg ument

denied , 2016 WL 3092687 (Del. Super. May 24, 2016).(2) Under Supreme Court Rule 42, applications for interlocutory review

are addressed to this Court’s sound discretion. In determining whether to accept

the interlocutory appeal, this Court may consider all relevant factors, including the

trial court’s decisio n of whether to certify the appeal.

(3) In a detailed order dated June 20, 2016, the Superior Court carefully

considered the relevant factors in Rule 42(b) and explained why interlocutory

review was not warranted. We give considerable weight to a trial j udge’s

thoughtful consideration of the Rule 42(b) factors

. For the reasons stated in the

Superior Court’s well

- reasoned order , the Court determines in its discretion that

the application for interlocutory review does not meet the requirements of

Rule 42(b ) and should be refused.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the interlocutory

appeal is REFUSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 299 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 299

   To make technical corrections to the Standing Rules of the Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2000

   Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Dodd) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To make technical corrections to the Standing Rules of the Senate.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. DATE CHANGES.

    Each of the recommended forms in paragraph 3 of rule II of the 
Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by striking ``19'' each place 
it appears and inserting ``20''.

SEC. 2. CORRECTIONS.

    (a) Incorrect Order.--Rule XXV of the Standing Rules of the Senate 
is amended--
            (1) in paragraph 1, by redesignating subparagraphs (l) and 
        (m) as subparagraphs (m) and (l), respectively; and
            (2) in paragraph 2, by moving the item relating to the 
        Committee on the Judiciary to the end of the list.
    (b) Name Correction.--Paragraph 5(b) of rule XXXVII of the Standing 
Rules of the Senate is amended by inserting ``Select'' before 
``Committee on Ethics''.
    (c) Cross Reference.--Paragraph 6(d) of rule XLI of the Standing 
Rules of the Senate is amended by striking ``11'' and inserting ``12''.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued March 7, 2013

 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-12-00743-CV

IN RE WYDELL DIXON & ALL ANIMALS, ALIVE, UNBORN & 

DECEASED, Relator

Original Proceedings on Petitions for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

By petitions for writ of mandamus, relator, Wydell Dixon, seeks relief from 

the trial court’s judgment of May 29, 2012.

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown. 

 1 The underlying case is Texas City Animal Control v. Wydell Dixon, No. CV-67387 in the 

County Court at Law No. 3 of Galveston County, Texas, the Hon. Christopher Dupuy, 

presiding.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT 3 OF DALLAS COUNTY OF DALLAS COUNTY, 

GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 13th 

day of January, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Larry Jermaine Wigenton, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-14-00057-CR

Trial Court No. F-1371124-J

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Larry Jermaine Wigenton, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 12th day of March, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-60865) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 1997 Stock Option
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-68583) pertaining to the
Friction Products Co. Profit Sharing Plan; S.K. Wellman Retirement Savings and
Profit Sharing Plan; Helsel, Inc. Employee's Retirement Plan; Helsel, Inc.
Employee's Savings and Investment Plan; Sinterloy Corporation 401(k) Plan; Hawk
Motors, Inc. (fka Hutchinson Products LLC) Employees' 401(k) Plan; and Hawk
Corporation 401(k) Savings and Retirement Plan and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47220) pertaining to the Hawk Corporation 2000 Long
Term Incentive Plan of our report dated March 25, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Hawk Corporation and subsidiaries included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
March 25, 2002
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended February 26, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Danielle Imel, Treasurerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     1.          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     2.          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|     |  |                                                                       |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Danielle Imel                                                     |
|     |  | Danielle Imel*Treasurer	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Date: April 12, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 5, 2009



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 17, 2012, Cerilliant Corporation, 811 Paloma Drive, Suite A, Round Rock, Texas 78665-2402, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
Schedule4-methyl-N-methylcathinone (1248)
I3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (7535)
I3,4-methylenedioxy-N-methylcathinone (7540)
IDesomorphine (9055)
I
 The company plans to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances to make reference standards which will be distributed to their customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, 
                    **Federal Register**
                     Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 1, 2012. Dated: March 23, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-7759 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 32.2






Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to






Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer,





hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:






(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.









Date: December 9, 2010








ROTOBLOCK CORPORATION




/s/ Richard Di Stefano





By: Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer