alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

I, Gary M. Clifford, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of I-Link Incorporated;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         [Intentionallyomitted];

 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(d)         Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date:December 30, 2004

 

By:

/s/  Gary M. Clifford

 

Gary M. Clifford

 

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 91 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 91

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible incorporation of the 
        Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the former Soviet 
        Union;
Whereas the declaration on March 11, 1990, of the reestablishment of full 
        sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Lithuania led to the 
        disintegration of the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Lithuania since then has successfully built democracy, ensured human and 
        minority rights, the rule of law, developed a free market economy, 
        implemented exemplary relations with neighboring countries, and 
        consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free 
        and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and 
        the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
Whereas Lithuania, as a result of the progress of its political and economic 
        reforms, has made, and continues to make, a significant contribution 
        toward the maintenance of international peace and stability by, among 
        other actions, its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in 
        Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby--
            (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occasion of the tenth 
        anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence and the 
        leading role it played in the disintegration of the former 
        Soviet Union; and
            (2) commends Lithuania for its success in implementing 
        political and economic reforms, which may further speed the 
        process of that country's integration into European and Western 
        institutions.

            Passed the Senate March 2, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 91

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of 
  the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former 
                             Soviet Union.
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 18

A resolution making certain majority appointments to certain Senate

committees for the 106th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 14, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

A resolution making certain majority appointments to certain

Senate committees for the 106th Congress.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of S.

2 Res. 400 of the 95th Congress, or the provisions of rule

3 XXV, the following shall constitute the majority member4 ship on those Senate committees listed below for the 106th

5 Congress, or until their successors are appointed:

6 BUDGET: Mr. Domenici (Chairman), Mr. Grassley,

7 Mr. Nickles, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bond, Mr. Gorton, Mr.

8 Gregg, Ms. Snowe, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Frist, Mr. Grams,

9 Mr. Smith of Oregon.
2

SRES 18 ATS

1 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING: Mr. Grassley

2 (Chairman), Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Craig, Mr. Burns, Mr.

3 Shelby, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Hagel, Ms. Collins, Mr. Enzi,

4 Mr. Bunning, Mr. Hutchinson.

Æ
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  May 16, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Michael Caporale, Jr.Michael Caporale, Jr.Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 5, 2008



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. John MASTRONARDO and Michael Famularo, Appellees.

No. 87-1034.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Aug. 3, 1988.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm. Beach, for appellant.

David G. Vinikoor, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Mastronardo.

Paul Stark, Plantation, for appellee Fa-mularo.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand on the authority of *State v. Cogswell,*521 So.2d 1081 (Fla.1988).

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JAMES LEE TROUTMAN, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 523 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
* District Judge for the Southern District of Texas,

sitting by designation. 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 12, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41009

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TEHRAN ANDRE BATEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CR-67-2

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and ROSENTHAL,

District Judge.*

PER CURIAM:**

Tehran Batey appeals the sentence he received following his

guilty plea for possession with intent to distribute cocaine in

violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). He renews his argument,

preserved in the district court, that his constitutional rights

were violated when the district court assessed a two-level
No. 04-41009

-2-

2

enhancement for possession of a firearm, pursuant to §

2D1.1(b)(1) (2003), citing Blakely v. Washington, 159 L.Ed. 2d

403 (2004). 

The government concedes that it cannot meet its burden under

a harmless error analysis that the mandatory nature of the

guidelines did not contribute to the sentence imposed. United

States v. Akpan, ___ F.3d ___, No. 03-20875, 2005 WL 852416 at

*12 (5th Cir. April 14, 2005). Accordingly, Batey’s sentence

must be vacated and remanded for resentencing consistent with

Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). 

VACATED and REMANDED.
#### Christopher W. BEAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Royal McKINSTER, Sheriff of Douglas County, State of Colorado, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 81SA562.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Oct. 18, 1982.

*619J. Gregory Walta, Colorado State Public Defender, Shelley Gilman, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., John Daniel Dailey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Christopher W. Beam, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus in an extradition proceeding, section 16-19-101 *et seq.,*C.R.S. 1973 (now in 1978 Repl. Vol. 8). We affirm.

The state of Texas sought the return of a person named in the Governor’s warrant and extradition documents as “Chris Beam.” The petitioner asserts that Chris Beam, the person against whom extradition is sought, does not identify “Christopher W. Beam,” although the petitioner used the named “Christopher Beam” in the trial proceedings. The use of the middle initial occurs for the first time on appeal. Petitioner argues that because of the failure to include his full name, the prosecution has failed to meet its burden of showing that the petitioner is the person sought by Texas. *Samples v. Cronin,*189 Colo. 40, 536 P.2d 306 (1975).

For the reasons set forth in *Beverly*v. *Davis,*648 P.2d 621 (Colo.1982), and *Guy*v. *Nelson,*630 P.2d 610 (Colo.1981), we do not find the minor discrepancy in the extradition documents to be sufficient to affect the prosecution’s *prima facie*showing of the identity of the fugitive sought. *In re Extradition of Leonard,*27 Ill.App.3d 870, 327 N.E.2d 480 (1975). No evidence of misidentification appears in the record, and no evidence was offered to show that he was not the person sought by the Texas authorities.

Once the prosecution has established a *prima facie*showing of identity, the person charged as a fugitive must show that he is not the person sought by the demanding state. *See Guy v. Nelson, supra; Richardson v. Cronin,*621 P.2d 949 (Colo.1980); *Samples v. Cronin, supra; Dilworth v. Leach,*183 Colo. 206, 515 P.2d 1130 (1973). The petitioner has failed to meet his burden.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine ; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biomedical Library and Informatics Review 
Committee
    Date: June 7-8, 2012.
    Time: June 7, 2012, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: June 8, 2012, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Contact Person: Arthur A. Petrosian, Ph.D., Chief Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of 
Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 
301-496-4253, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a0a1f0e081509131b3a171b131654141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4b3b2e3f392438222a0b262a222765252223652c243d">[email protected]</span></a>

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7239 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Tyronne Joseph FORREST, Sr. v. Frank SHEA, Judge of Criminal District Court, Section “G”.

No. 86-KH-1149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Forrest, Tyronne Joseph Sr.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

*17Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not abeady done so, on the post conviction petition submitted in March, 1986, which relator avers was received for filing on March 18, 1986.
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned,
Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stanley P.
Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

|                    |     |                               
|------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|Date: May
 11, 2010 |     |                               
|                    |     |                               
|                    | /s/ | ALLEN S.
 GREENE              
|                    |     |                               
|                    |     | Allen S. Greene               
|                    |     | Chief Executive Officer       
|                    |     | (Principal Executive Officer) 
|                    |     |                               
|                    | /s/ | STANLEY P.
 WIRTHEIM          
|                    |     |                               
|                    |     | Stanley P. Wirtheim           
|                    |     | Chief Financial Officer       
|                    |     | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 40673 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Rubicel Cardenas**

**- Mendoza,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 504

- 5

Before **Wiener, Elrod,**  and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Rubicel Cardenas

- Mendoza has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cardenas

- Mendoza has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-40673 Document: 00516438648 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2022No. 21

- 40673

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave t o withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir.**
**R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-40673 Document: 00516438648 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2022
#### Edna Lee FISHER v. Henry CORKERN, et al.

No. 86-CC-1308.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1986.

In re Asplundh Tree Expert Company and The Travelers Insurance Company; applying for writ of review and stay order; to the 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 75532, Division “A”; Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW 86-0735.

Denied.