alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months period
      ended March 31, 2007 of the Claymore MACROshares Oil Up Tradeable Trust (the
      " **Registrant** "),
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      " **Quarterly**  **Report** "),
      I,
      Samuel Masucci, III, principal executive officer of MACRO Securities Depositor,
      LLC, which acts as the depositor for the Registrant (the " **Depositor** "),
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                13(a) or
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly represents,
                in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
                of the
                Registrant.











Date:
      May
      17, 2007





/s/
      Samuel Masucci, III


Samuel
      Masucci, III


On
      behalf
      of the Registrant


and
      as
      Chief Executive Officer
JEFF L. ROSE, CHIEF JUSTICE

DAVID PURYEAR, JUSTICE

BOB PEMBERTON, JUSTICE

MELISSA GOODWIN, JUSTICE

SCOTT K. FIELD, JUSTICE

CINDY OLSON BOURLAND, JUSTICE

The Honorable Velva L. Price

Civil District Clerk

Travis County Courthouse

P.O.Box 1748

Austin, TX 78767

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Court of Appeals

Third District of Texas

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

www.txcourts.gov/3rdcoa.aspx

(512) 463-1733

IT

Marcrr5T2015

JEFFREY D. KYLE, CLERK

RE: Court of Appeals Number: 03-11-00735-CV and 03-11-00736-CV

Trial Court Case Number: D-l-GN-10-002867 and D-l-GN-10-001389

Style: Texas State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

v. Greg Abbott, Attorney General ofthe State of Texas

Dear Honorable Velva L. Price:

The Third Court of Appeals has issued the mandate in this cause. Therefore, I am returning

the following original exhibits:

SEALED: Plaintiffs exhibits I and M; Defendant's exhibit 2.

Very truly yours,

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Filed in The District Court

of Travis County, Texas

MAR 1 2 2015

At M.

Velva L. Price, District Clerk

/v\P
#### Pauline M. WILLIS, et al. v. LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, et al. Ida Mae FARLEY v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, et al. Donald JENNINGS v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, et al. A.G. JENNINGS v. LOUISIANA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, et al.

No. 88-C-1043.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Morbark Industries Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 19497-CA, 19480-CA, 19482-CA and 19481-CA; Parish of Red River, 39th Judicial District Court, Nos. 26047, 26096, 26231 and 26230.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 42.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6994

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MELISSA MENDORA HARLESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at 

Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:16-cr-00001-JPJ-PMS-13)

Submitted: April 30, 2021 Decided: June 7, 2021

Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Melissa Mendora Harless, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Suzanne Kerney-Quillen, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Melissa Mendora Harless appeals the district court’s order denying without 

prejudice her “Motion Requesting Modification of Sentence Pursuant to Compelling 

Circumstances.”∗

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

First, the district court correctly concluded that it lacked authority to order Harless’ 

release to home confinement, insofar as she sought relief under the Coronavirus Aid, 

Relief, and Economic Security Act, Pub. L. No. 116-136, § 12003(b)(2), 134 Stat. 281, 516 

(2020) (“CARES Act”). See United States v. Saunders, 986 F.3d 1076, 1078 (7th Cir. 

2021). Second, to the extent Harless fairly challenges the issue on appeal, see Erickson v. 

Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007), we conclude that the district court acted within its 

discretion in declining to construe Harless’ motion as a request for compassionate release 

under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391 (“First Step Act”), and in denying 

Harless’ motion without prejudice to her ability to bring a compassionate release motion 

supported by additional, necessary information. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 

329-30 (4th Cir. 2021) (describing standard of review and requirements for establishing 

eligibility for compassionate release). Although Harless attempts to provide such

supplemental information on appeal, we decline to consider those new materials. See Fed. 

R. App. P. 10(a); In re Under Seal, 749 F.3d 276, 285 (4th Cir. 2014). Instead, Harless’ 

∗ We conclude that the district court’s denial of Harless’ motion without prejudice

does not deprive us of jurisdiction over this appeal. See Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC, 959 F.3d 

605, 610-12 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied, 141 S. Ct. 1376 (2021). 
3

new arguments and evidence in support of compassionate release should be considered, if 

at all, by the district court in the first instance.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We deny as moot Harless’ motion 

to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 7

To amend Senate Resolution 208 of the 105th Congress to increase funding

of the Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology-Related Problems.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for Mr. BENNETT) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend Senate Resolution 208 of the 105th Congress

to increase funding of the Special Committee on the

Year 2000 Technology-Related Problems.

1 Resolved, That section 5(a)(1) of Senate Resolution

2 208, agreed to April 2, 1998 (105th Congress), as amend3 ed by Senate Resolution 231, agreed to May 18, 1998,

4 is amended by—

5 (1) striking ‘‘$575,000’’ both places it appears

6 and inserting ‘‘$875,000’’; and

7 (2) striking ‘‘$200,000’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘$500,000’’.

Æ
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA-2012-1034

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM051AD

A320-55-1035 --- 2/17/10

A320-55-1036 --- 2/17/10

A320-55-1037 --- 2/17/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
PL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711.

OFFIcWra8NE^(

STATE OF TEXAS

PENALTY FOR

PRIVATE USE

U.S.POSTAGE» PITNEY BOWES

Ct/No. A05-215-3

This is to advise that the Court^has'denied without written order the application for

writ of habeas corpus. / '

*"~ "' Abel Acosta, Clerk

ZIP 78701

02 W

0001401623 JUN. 17. 2015

6/17/2015

HAINES, RODNEY STEVE

'i

Tr. WR-83,380-07

MEBN3B 7 i'5S3

RODNEY STEVE HAINES

TERRELL UNIT - TDC # 1347790

1300 FM 655

ROSHARON, TX 77583 REi

||..|||iliii'iiiiiili''1iiii'i',lilihllli'l,li1llllil)iil,i'iil ft

.V:
#### COMMERCIAL CLAIMS, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GLENWOOD SPRINGS, Garnishee-Appellee, and Ram Construction, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Defendant.

No. 82CA0251.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

July 15, 1982.

Sobol & Sobol, P. C., Harry Sobol, Denver, for plaintiff-appellant.

Delaney & Baleomb, P. C., John A. Thul-son, Glenwood Springs, for garnishee-appel-lee.

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiff, Commercial Claims, Ltd., obtained a judgment against defendant, Ram Construction, Inc., and sought to garnish funds held by garnishee, First National Bank of Glenwood Springs. Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order awarding garnishee attorneys’ fees for a frivolous claim. We reverse.

Section 13-17-101, C.R.S.1973 (1981 Cum.Supp.) provides for attorneys’ fees under certain circumstances “in any suit involving money damages .... ” A garnishment is not such an action. It “is but an ancillary proceeding ... in aid of execution issued pursuant to an existing judgment, thus limiting any judgment proper to be entered against the garnishees to the extent of the unpaid balance of the judgment upon which execution issued.” *Wright*v. *Nelson,*125 Colo. 217, 242 P.2d 243 (1952). While attorneys’ fees for the garnishee could be permitted by statute, *see, e.g.,*N.M.Stat.Ann. § 35-12-16(B) (1978), *cited in Bank of New Mexico*v. *Priestley,*95 N.M. 569, 624 P.2d 511 (1981), there is no such provision in any Colorado statute or rule. *See*C.R.C.P. 103(y).

The judgment is reversed.

PIERCE and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Andre’ DiMino, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the Company hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented
and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.


Date:
      July 14, 2009
                    
                    /s/
      Andre’ DiMinoChief
      ExecutiveOfficer
      andChief
      FinancialOfficer




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q
or as a separate disclosure document.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and will be
retained by ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DWQ Topics DWQ Programs & Units

Water Pollution Management Element Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control Industrial Stormwater Permitting Program Municipal Stormwater Regulation Program Onsite Wastewater Management Program Discharge to Ground Water Permitting Program Stormwater Management
General Permits
Individual Permits Find Forms | Contact Us 

## Dental Facilities Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (K2) This general permit authorizes those who discharge wastewater to the ground water from new or existing dental facilities using individual subsurface sewage disposal systems, i.e. “septic systems”, or Class V Underground Injection Control (UIC) wells. This per mit was developed to remove dental amalgam prior to entering the waste stream b y requiring dental facilities that generate amalgam waste to implement Best Manag ement Practices (BMPs) and install an amalgam separator. Contact: Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control , (609) 292-0407 

### Related Documents, Publications and Forms Title Type Other Format PDF Format NJPDES Form 1 (pdf, 232Kb) Application NJPDES DGW Checklist: Individual and General Discharge to Ground Water Permits (pdf, 37Kb) Guidance

Final Permit (pdf, 51Kb) Permit Supplemental Application Form (pdf, 24Kb) Application Program Information Sheet (pdf 197, Kb) Guidance
K2 Certification Form Form

department 

## : njdep home 

## | about dep 

## | index by topic 

## | programs/units 

## | dep online 

## Page 1 of 2 NJDEP
- Division of Water Quality

- Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

- Dental Facilitie
...

5/6/2011 http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dwq/k2.htmstatewide: njhome 

## | citizen 

## | business 

## | government 

## | services A to Z 

## | departments 

## | search

Copyright © State of New Jersey, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection P. O. Box 402 Trenton, NJ 08625-0402 Last Updated: April 20, 2011 

## Page 2 of 2 NJDEP
- Division of Water Quality

- Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

- Dental Facilitie
...

5/6/2011 http://www.state.nj.us/dep/dwq/k2.htm
Order entered April 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00415-CV

IN RE CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR., Relator

On Appeal from the 78th District Court

Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 48,429-B

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

habeas corpus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Keefe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ David J. KeefeDavid J. KeefeChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this Report.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4057-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated March 6, 2012, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 13, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 6, 2012.

## Grayson, Larue, Ohio, Russell, and Trimble Counties for Individual Assistance

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2012-7926 Filed 4-2-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

12th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20006

TEL: 202 659 6600

FAX: 202 659 6699

Evelyn D. Sahr

202 659 6622

esahr@eckertseamans.com

May 29, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

Room W86-316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Polling Results for Application of JetBlue Airways Corporation for 

Exemption Authority (US-Ecuador), Docket DOT-OST-2015-0103

Dear Mr. Gretch,

Please be advised we have polled and received non-objections from each of the U.S. carriers on 

the attached service list for the above-referenced application of JetBlue Airways Corporation 

(JetBlue). JetBlue respectfully requests the Department take prompt action on its application so 

that marketing of its U.S.-Ecuador service can begin as soon as possible and well ahead of 

JetBlue’s anticipated start date of February 25, 2016. 

Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

____________

Evelyn D. Sahr

Drew M. Derco

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation
Service List

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

abigail.donovan@aa.com

American Airlines

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com

Delta Air Lines

gmurphy@crowell.com

sseiden@crowell.com

dan.weiss@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

United Airlines

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

UPS

jegillick@zsrlaw.com Tampa Cargo

bill@mietuslaw.com Sky Lease

cristinasa@state.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

darren.jaffe@dot.gov

reese.davidson@dot.gov

kgeorge@broward.org FLL

info@airlineinfo.com
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-20-00220-CV

SAMUEL RAY HINES AND

THE OTHER SCOTT AND FOSTER HEIRS, ET AL.,

Appellants

v.

GLEN HEGAR, 

TEXAS COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS,

THE STATE OF TEXAS, RAJENA SCOTT, AND

BUETTA SCOTT

Appellees

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-000225-CV-272

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 11, 2023, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Dismiss for Settlement,” 

which states that they have reached an agreement to settle the appeal. The parties ask 

this Court to set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand 

the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their agreement. 
Hines v. Hegar, et al Page 2

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties further request that costs of the appeal be 

taxed to the party incurring the same. 

The agreed motion is granted. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s judgment 

without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings 

in accordance with the parties’ agreement. 

JIM R. WRIGHT

Senior Chief Justice

Before Justice Johnson and

Justice Wright1

Motion granted; remanded

Opinion delivered and filed October 26, 2023

[CV06]

1 The Honorable Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired) of the Eleventh Court of Appeals, sitting by 

assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003.
#### STATE ex rel. David Scott JOHNSON v. CLERK OF COURT, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 87-KH-1224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 19, 1987.

In re Johnson, David Scott; applying for writ of review and remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 209-908.

Granted to order trial court to furnish a copy of sentencing transcript if available. Otherwise denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Rickey Lee BROWN v. Larry W. JEANE, Warden, C.B.

No. 86-KH-1623.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 6, 1987.

In re Brown, Rickey Lee; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. "C”, No. 120730; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW 86 0857.

Granted. The district court is ordered to conduct an evidentiary hearing. If proof is adduced that at sentencing the judge had erroneous information concerning relator’s previous convictions the court shall set aside relator’s sentence and re-sentence him.
#### Katy TALTON and Interstate Securities Corp., Appellants, v. William N. ALBAUGH and his wife, Virginia T. Alhaugh, Appellees.

No. 88-0598.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 19, 1988.

*1071Lloyd R. Schwed of Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Douglas Jovanovic, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. *See Leicht v. Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc.,*848 F.2d 130 (9th Cir.1988).

The options agreement between the parties, under which some 82% of the transactions took place, explicitly states that arbitration cannot be compelled with respect to disputes arising under federal securities laws. The subject provision, supplied by appellants, in no way indicates dependence on the rule set forth in *Wilko v. Swan,*346 U.S. 427, 74 S.Ct. 182, 98 L.Ed. 168 (1953), which some courts, including this one, consider to have been overruled in *Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon,*482 U.S. 220, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987).

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.