T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J A M ES BRY A N T PH I FER, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. SACR AM ENTO CI TY AN D COU NTY HO US I NG AN D R E DE VE L OP ME NT A G E N C Y a nd A N N E M O O R E , E xe c ut i ve D i re ct or, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 17222 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 7 4 7 - L KK DA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a w r e nc e K . K a r l t on, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. Jam es B ry antP hi fe r app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s s um m ary j udgm e nti n hi s a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha tde f e nda nt s di s c r i m i na t e d a ga i ns thi m on the



# FI LED MA R 04 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17222 2 b asi s o f h i s race an dd i sab i l i ty b y d en yi n g h i s reaso n ab l e acco m m o d at i o n req u est t o tr a ns f e rt o a nothe rhous i ng uni t , a nd c ha ngi ng hi s e nr ol l m e ntda t e on the w a i t i ng l i s tf o raH o u s i n g Ch o i c e V o u c h e rp r o g r a m. W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, G a m b le v . C i t yof Es c ondi do , 104 F . 3d 300, 304 ( 9th C i r . 1997) , a nd f ora n abus e of d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f

le a v e to a m e n d , Chodos v . W es t P ubl is hi ng C o. , 292 F . 3d 9 9 2 , 1 0 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f irm . T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t o n P h ifer ’s di sc ri m i nat i on cl ai m s bec ause he fa i l ed t o rai se a genui ne i ss ue of m at er i al fa ctas t o w h eth er d efen d an t s d en i edh i s tran sfer req u estb ecau se o f h i s race o r d i sab i l i ty, fa i l ed t o acc om m od at e hi s di sabi l i ty, or changed h i s H ou si ng C ho i ce V ou cher p r o g r a m e n r o llm e n t d a te . Se e Zu kle v . R eg e n ts o f U n iv . o f Ca l. , 166 F . 3d 1041, 10 45 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( A m er i cans w i th D i sabi l i t i es A ctand R ehabi l i t at i on A ct ); G a m b le , 10 4 F . 3d at30 6-07 (F ai r H ou si ng A ct ); Fo b b s v. H o l y Cro ss H

ea l th S ys. C or p. , 29 F . 3d 14 39 , 14 47 (9th C i r. 19 94 ) ( T i t l e V I) , ov e rr ule d on othe rgr ounds byD av i ton v . C olum bi a/ HC A H e al thc ar e C or

p. , 24 1 F . 3d 11 31 (9th C i r. 20 01 ) ( en banc). T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g P h if e r ’s m o tio n to a m e n dh is c o m p la in t a f

te rth e s c h e d u lin g o r d e rd e a d lin e b e c au s e P h if e rf a ile dto09- 17222 3 show “ go od cause. ” John son v. M am m oth R ec re at i on s I

nc. , 975 F . 2d 604, 607- 09 ( 9th C i r . 1992) ( R ul e 16( b) ’ s “ good c aus e ” s t a nda r d appl i e s w he n apl a i nt i f f s e e ks t o am end a com pl ai ntaf t erthe sc hedu l i ng order deadl i ne, and the pri m ary c ons i de r a t i on i n the good c aus e de t e rm i na t i on i s the “ di l i ge nc e of the pa rtys e e ki ng the am endm ent ”) . P hi fe r’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. W e d o n o t c o n s id e rP h if e r ’s c o n te n tio n s r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e T r av e le rs P r op. Cas . C o. of A m . v . C onoc oP hi l l i

ps C o. , 546 F . 3d 1142, 1146 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). W e de nyP hi f

e r ’ s m ot i on t o s tr i ke a nd r e que s tf orj udi c i a l not i c e . W e gr a nt defe nd ant s’ re qu es tfor j ud i ci al no t i ce . A F F I R M E D .