# UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX



# 75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco

, CA 941 05-3901



# OCT 2 1 2015

Mr. Daniel K

. Inouye

Chief, Monitoring and Planning Branch

Air Quality Management Division

Washoe County Health District

P.O

. Box 11130

Reno, Nevada 89520-0027

Dear Mr. Inouye :

Thank you for your submission of the Washoe County Health District's 2015 Ambient Air

Monitoring Network Plan in July 2015. We have reviewed the submitted document based on the

requirements set forth under 40 CFR 58. Based on the information provided in the plan, the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approves all portions ofthe network plan except those

specifically identified below.

Please note that we cannot approve portions of the annual network plan for which the

information in the plan is insufficient to judge whether the requirement has been met, or for

which the information

, as described, does not meet the requirements as specified in 40 CFR

58.10 and the associated appendices. EPA Region 9 also cannot approve portions of the plan for

which the EPA Administrator has not delegated approval authority to the regional offices.

Accordingly

, the first enclosure 

# (A. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Items where EPA is Not

Taking Action) provides a listing of specific items of your agency ' s annual monitoring network

plan where EPA is not taking action. The second enclosure 

# (B. Additional Items Requiring

Attention) is a listing of additional items in the plan that EPA wishes to bring to your agency's

attention

.

The third enclosure (C. 

# Annual Monitoring Netw ork Plan Checkli s t) is the checklist EPA used to

review your plan for overall items that are required to be included in the annual network plan

along with our assessment of whether the plan submitted by your agency addresses those

requirements

.

The first two enclosures highlight a subset of the more extensive list of items reviewed in the

third enclosure. All comments conveyed via this letter (and enclosures) should be addressed

(through corrections within the plan, additional infonnation being included, or discussion) in

next year's annual monitoring network plan.

We also want to thank you for your timely submission of the 2015 Ambient Air Monitoring

Network Assessment for the Washoe County Health District

, as required under 40 CFR Part

Printed on Recycled Paper

# 58.10. We recognize that preparing the network assessment was a significant project and we appreciate your effort.

The recently revised ozone NAAQS, finalized on October 1, 2015, includes language that

revokes all existing seasonal ozone waivers upon the effective date of the final rule. EPA Region

9 will consider all previously approved ozone season waivers effective until December 31, 2015.

In advance of the 2016 ozone monitoring season (January- December), EPA Region 9

recommends that agencies seeking new ozone waivers for the 2015 8-hour Ozone NAAQS of

0.070 ppm submit waiver requests no later than December 1, 2015.

If you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed comments, please feel free to

contact me at (415) 947-4534 or Michael Flagg at (415) 972-3372.

Enclosures: Sincerely,



# lU~~

Meredith Kurpius, M'anagj

Air Quality Analysis Office

A. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Items where EPA is Not Taking Action

B. Additional Items Requiring Attention

C. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist

cc (via email): Craig Petersen, Washoe County AQMD

# A. Annual Monitoring Network Plan Items where EPA is Not Taking Action

We are not acting on the portions of annual network plans where either EPA Region 9 lacks the

authority to approve specific items of the plan, or EPA has determined that a requirement is

either not met or information in the plan is insufficient to judge whether the requirement has

been met.

• Per 40 CFR 58.11(c), NCore, PAMS, and STN network design and changes are subject to

approval of the EPA Administrator. Therefore, we are not acting on these items.

• EPA identified items in your agency's annual monitoring network plan where a

requirement was not being met or information in the plan was insufficient to judge

whether the requirement was being met based on 40 CFR 58.1 0 and the associated

appendices. Therefore, we are not acting on the following items:

Item Checklist Row Issue

For low volume PM 17 Insufficient information to judge

instruments (flow rate< 200

liters/minute), all other PM

instruments are 

# > 1 m from

the lovol. If no, list distance

(meters) and instruments.

Distance from supporting 78 Not meeting requirement

structure

Additional infonnation for each of these items may be found for the row listed in column 2, in

the third enclosure (C. 

# Annual Monitoring Network Plan Checklist).

# B. Additional Items Requiring Attention

• [Item 21] The minimum monitoring requirements for PM2.s are specified in 40 CFR 58

Appendix D 4.7.1(a) in terms of number of sites: "State, and where applicable local,

agencies must operate the minimum number of required PM2.s SLAMS sites listed in

Table D-5 of this appendix" not number of monitors. Please modify next year's ANP to

present this requirement in terms of number of sites.

• [Item 22] There is a requirement for one continuous monitor per 40 CFR 58 Appendix D

4.7.2. There were three sites in 2014 with continuous PM2.s FEM monitors operating.

Although there is information in this year's ANP demonstrating the requirement is met, it

doesn't specifically discuss the requirement in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D 4.7.2. Please

consider adding this to next year's plan, for example, in a footnote or paragraph

following Table 4.C. ANNUAL MONITORING NETWORK PLAN CHECKLIST

(Updated October 1, 2015)

Year: 2015 Agency: Washoe County Health District Air Quality Management Division (AQMD)

40 CFR 58.10(a)(l) requires that each Annual Network Plan (ANP) include information regarding the following types of monitors: SLAMS

monitoring stations including FRM, FEM, and ARM monitors that are part of SLAMS, NCore stations, STN stations, State speciation stations, SPM

stations, and / or, in serious, severe and extreme ozone nonattainment areas, P AMS stations, and SPM monitoring stations.

40 CFR 58.1 0( a)( 1) further directs that, "The plan shall include a statement of purposes for each monitor and evidence that siting and operation of

each monitor meets the requirements of appendices A , C, D, and E of this part, where applicable." On this basis, review of the ANPs is based on the

requirements listed in 58.10 along with those in Appendices A, C, D, and E.

EPA Region 9 will not take action to approve or disapprove any item for which Part 58 grants approval authority to the Administrator rather than the

Regional Administrators, but we will do a check to see if the required information is included and correct. The items requiring approval by the

Administrator are: P AMS, NCore, and Speciation (STN / CSN).

Please note that this checklist summarizes many of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 58, but does not substitute for those requirements, nor do its

contents provide a binding determination of compliance with those requirements. The checklist is subject to revision in the future and we welcome

comments on its contents and structure.

Key: White I meets the requirement

Yellow I requirement is not met, or information is insufficient to make a determination. Action requested in next year's plan or outside the ANP

process (items listed in Enclosure A).

p reen J item requires attention in order to improve next year's plan (items listed in Enclosure B). 1

### ANP requirement Citation Was the Does the Notes

within 40 information information

CFR58 submitted? 1 

### If 

### provided 3 

### meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4



### incorrect 2 

### ?

GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS



### .......... 

## •.. .•

. **.~.** 

## ;c. >> ·.··· 

# . .. 

# .. **·~;**

1. Submit plan by July 1st 58.10 (a)(l) Yes Yes

2.

30-day public comment 

### I inspection period 5 58.10 (a)(1), Yes, transmittal Yes No comments received

58.10 (a)(2) email

3. Modifications to SLAMS network- case when we 58.10 (a)(2) Yes, pages 9-11 Yes None

are not approving system modifications 58.10 (b)(5) 58.10(e) 58.14

4. Modifications to SLAMS network- case when we 58.10 (a)(2) NA NA None

are approving system modifications per 58.14 58.10 (b)(5) 58.10(e) 58.14

5. Does plan include documentation (e.g., attached Yes, Appendix Yes Plan includes EPA approval letters for the Galletti

approval letter) for system modifications that have A&B site closure, the Spanish Springs SPM site initiation

been approved since last ANP approval? and expected conversion to a SLAMS, and the South

Reno discontinuation of CO monitoring.

6. Any proposals to remove or move a monitoring 58.10 (b)(5) Yes, pages 9-11 Yes Site initiation of Spanish Springs SPM site (See Row

station within a period of 18 months following plan 5)

submittal

7. A plan for establishing a near-road 

### PM2.s monitor (in 58.10(a)(8)(i) NA NA

CBSAs 2::2.5 million) by 11112015 (plan was due

July 1, 2014)

8. A plan for establishing a near-road CO monitor (in 58.10(a)(7) NA NA

CBSAs 2:: 2.5 million) by 11112015 (plan was due 58.13(e)(1)

July 1, 2014)

9. N02 plan for establishment of 2nd near-road monitor 58.10 NA NA

by 11112015 (plan was due July 1, 2014) (a)(5)(iv)

1 Response options: NA (Not Applicable), Yes, No, Incomplete, Incorrect. The responses "Incomplete" and "Incorrect" assume that some information has been provided.

2 To the best of our knowledge.

3 Assuming the information is correct

4

Response options: NA (Not Applicable) [reason], Yes, No, Insufficient to Judge.

5

The affected state or local agency must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments received through the public notification process within

their submitted plan. 

### 2ANP requirement Citation Was the Does the Notes

within 40 information information

CFRSS submitted? 1 If provided 3 meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4

incorrect 2 ?

10. Precision/ Accuracy reports submitted to AQS 58.16(a); Yes, page 11 Yes

App A, 1.3

and 5.1.1

11. Atmual data certification submitted 58.15 Yes, page 11 Yes

App. A 1.3

12. Statement that SPMs operating an FRM/FEM/ ARM 58.11 (a)(2) NA NA No SPMs currently operating

that meet Appendix E also meet either Appendix A

or an approved alternative. Documentation for any

Appendix

A approved alternative should be

included. 6

13. SPMs operating FRM/FEM/ ARM monitors for over 58.20(c) NA NA No SPMs currently operating

24 months are listed as comparable to the NAAQS or

the agency provided documentation that

requirements from Appendices A, C, or E were not

met.

7

14. For agencies that share monitoring responsibilities in App D 2(e) NA NA

an MSA/CSA: this agency meets full monitoring

requirements or an agreement between the affected

agencies and the EPA Regional Administrator is in

place GENERAL PARTICULATE MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

**(PMtoiPJ\1'z.S:;l~~..;:~~~;s~)£~;t':tii~)z2~~~y** ·.·.·.·.·••·• 7 h:..

..· .. ···· .. · .· ...•..

. .

15. Designation of a primary monitor if there is more Need to Yes, page 30-31 Yes

than one monitor for a pollutant at a site. determine collocation

16. Distance between QA collocated monitors (Note: App.A Yes, page 31 Yes

waiver request or the date of previous waiver 3.2.5.6 and

approval must be included if the distance deviates 3.2.6.3

from requirement.)

6 Alternatives to the requirements of appendix A may be approved for an SPM site as part of the approval of the annual monitoring plan, or separately.

7 This requirement only applies to monitors that are eligible for comparison to the NAAQS per 40 CFR §§58.1l(e) and 58.30. .. **;v~;;{fl;.** . 

### I

3

### ANP requirement Citati o n Was the D o es the Notes

within 40 informati o n information

CFR58 submitted? 1 

### 1f 

### provided 3 

### meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4



### incorrect 2 

### ?

17. For low volume PM instruments (flow rate < 200 AppE Incomplete Insufficient Info Please include distance information in next year's

liters

/ minute), all other PM instruments are > 1 m ANP

from

the lovol. If no , list distance (meters) and

instruments.

18. For high vo lu me PM instruments (flow rate > 200 AppE NA NA None

liters

/ minute)

, all other PM instruments are > 2m

from the hivol. If no, list distance (meters) and

instruments.



# I PM2.5 -SPECIFIC MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 

## - 

# I

19 . Document how states and local agencies provide for 58

. 10 (c) Yes

, pages 1 0

- 11 Yes

the review of changes to a PM 2. 5 monitoring network

that impact the location of a violating 

### PM2 5 monitor

.

20 . Identification of any PM 2

. 5 FEMs and / or ARMs not 58

. 10 (b)(13) NA NA

eligible to be compared to the NAAQS due to poor 58

. 11 (e)

comparability to FRM(s) (Note 1: must include

required data assessment.) (Note 2: Required

SLAMS must monitor PM2 .5 withNAAQScomparable monitor at the required sample

frequency.)

21. Minimum # of monitoring sites for PM2.5 [Note l: AppD

, Yes, Pages 4-5 Yes Note the minimum monitoring requirements for

should be supported by MSA ID

, MSA population, 4.7.l(a) and PM 2. s are specified 

### in 40 CFR 58 Appendix D

DV , # monitoring sites

, and # required monitoring Table 

### D-5 4.7.l(a) 

### in terms of number of sites: "State

, and

sites] [Note 2: Only monitors considered to be where applicable local

, agencies must operate the

required SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards minimum number of required PM2.s SLAMS sites

meeting minimum monitoring requirements.] listed 

### in Table 

### D-5 of this appendix" not number of

monitors. Please modify next year ' s ANP to present

this

requirement in terms of number of sites

. 

### 4ANP requirement Citation Was the Does the Notes

within 40 information information

CFR58 submitted? 1 If provided 3 meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4

incorrect 2 ?

22. Requirements for continuous PM z . s monitoring App04.7.2 Yes, Pages 4-5 Yes There is a requirement for one continuous monitor

(number of monitors and collocation) See Note per 40 CFR 58 Appendix D 4. 7 .2. There were three

sites in 2014 with continuous PMz . s FEM monitors

operating. Although there is information in this

year's ANP demonstrating the requirement is met, it

doesn't specifically discuss the requirement in 40

CFR 58 Appendix D 4.7.2. Please consider adding

this to next year's plan , for example, in a footnote or

paragraph following Table 4.

23. FRM / FEM / ARM PMz.s QA collocation App A3.2 . 5 Yes, Page 8 Yes

24. PMz.s Chemical Speciation requirements for official App D 4.7.4 Yes, Page 30 Yes

STN sites

25. Identification of sites s uitabl e and sites not s uitable 58 . 10 (b)(7) Yes, Detailed site Yes

for comparison to the annual PMz .s NAAQS as information

described in Part 58.30

26. RequiTed PMz.s sites represent area-wide air quality AppD Yes, Detailed site Yes

4 . 7.l(b) information

27. For PMz.s, within each MSA, at least one site at AppD Yes , Detailed site Yes Galetti is listed as the maximum PM2.5 site

neighborhood or larger scale in an area of expected 4.7 .l(b)(l) information

maximum concentration

28. Minimum monitoring requirement for near-road 58 . 13(f)(l) NA NA

PMz . s monitor (in CBSA **~** 2.5 million) by 111/2015 AppD 4.7.1(b)(2)

29. If additional SLAMS PMz . s is required, there is a site AppD NA NA

in an area of poor air quality 4 . 7.1(b)(3)

30. States must have at least one PMz .s regional AppD4.7.3 NA NA This requirement is met by other agencies in the

background and one PMz.s regional transport site. state.

31. Sampling schedule for PMz .s - applies to year-round 58.10 (b)(4) Yes , Detailed site Yes

and seasonal samp ling schedules (note: date of 58 . 12(d) information

waiver approval must be included if the sampling App D 4 . 7

season deviate s from requirement) EPA

flowchart

32. Frequency of flow rate verification for manual PMz.s AppA3 . 3.2 Yes, Detailed site Yes

monitors audit information

33. Frequency of flow rate ver ification for automated App A 3.2.3 Yes, Detailed site Yes

PMz.s monitors audit information 5ANP requirement Citation **Wasth~** Does the Notes

within 40 information information

CFR58 submitted? 1 If provided 3 meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4

incorrect 2 ?

34. Dates of two semi-annual flow rate audits conducted App A, 3.2.4 Yes, Detailed site Yes

in

CY2014for PMz.s monitors and 3.3.3 information

I PM to -SPECIFIC MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

. )\,(j;/J'', I

**';~~,~~~~** t

35. Minimum # of monitoring sites for PM 10 AppD, 4.6 Yes, Page 5 Yes

(a) and Table

D-4

36. Manual PM10 method collocation (note: continuous App A3.3.1 NA NA

PM10 does not have this requirement)

37. Sampling schedule for PM10 58.10 (b)(4) Yes, Detailed site Yes

58.12(e) information

AppD4.6

38. Frequency of flow rate verification for manual PM 10 App A3.3.2 NA NA The only manual PM 10 monitor in the network is the

monitors audit QA-collocated PMc pair.

39. Frequency of flow rate verification for automated AppA3.2.3 Yes, Detailed site Yes

PM10 monitors audit information

40. Dates of two semi-ammal flow rate audits conducted App A, 3.2.4 Yes, Detailed site Yes

in CY2014 for PM 10 monitors and 3.3.3 information

I Pb -SPECIFIC MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ,';, ::: **{'~'~1:/:c'f:"'** '"y:r:::;(,)N

1 ;·,,/' **,;::::,>:;:~:::~~~{,~'{',,,** ,;:<,;>,!3}';>',; I

41. Minimum # of monitors for non-NCore Pb [Note: App D4.5 Yes, Page 7 Yes None

Only monitors considered to be required SLAMs are 58.13(a)

eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum

monitoring requirements.]

42. Pb collocation: for non-NCore sites App A 3.3.4.3 NA NA

43. Any source-oriented Pb site for which a waiver has 58.10 (b)(10) NA NA

been granted by EPA Regional Administrator

44. Any Pb monitor for which a waiver has been 58.10 (b )(11) NA NA

requested or granted by EPA Regional Administrator

for use ofPb-PM10 in lieu ofPb-TSP

45. Designation of any Pb monitors as either source- 58.10 (b)(9) NA NA

oriented or non-source-oriented

46. Sampling schedule for Pb 58.10 (b)(4) NA NA

58.12(b) AppD4.5 6ANP requirement Citation Was the Does the Notes

within 40 information information

CFR58 submitted? 1 If provided 3 meet

yes, page #s. the

Flag if requirement? 4

incorrect 2 ?

47. Frequency of flow rate verification for Pb monitors App A 3.3.4.1 NA NA

audit

48. Dates of two semi-annual flow rate audits conducted App A 3.3.4.1 NA NA

in CY2015 for Pb monitors

I GENERAL GASEOUS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

**',~~i{?;jc:;**

49. Frequency of one-point QC check (gaseous) App. A3.2.1 Yes, Detailed site Yes

information

50. Date of Annual Performance Evaluation (gaseous) App. A3.2.2 Yes, Detailed site Yes

conducted in CY2014 information

I 03. -SPECIFIC MONITORING REQUIREMENTS

51. Minimum # of monitoring sites for 03 [Note: should App D, 4.1(a) Yes, page4 Yes

be supported by MSA ID, MSA population, DV, # and Table D-2

monitoring sites, and# required monitoring sites] 8

52. Identification of maximum concentration 03 site( s) App D 4.1 (b) Yes, Detailed site Yes Sparks is listed as the maximum concentration site

information for 03.

53. Sampling season for 0 3 (Note: Waivers must be 58.10 (b)(4) Yes, Detailed site Yes

renewed ammally. EPA expects agencies to submit App D, 4.1 (i) information

re-evaluations of the relevant data each year with the

ANP. EPA will then respond as part of the ANP

response.)

NOz -SPECIFIC MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ' ·

.. · .• •· .•• >· :•'. **~·~1i'·2\** :.:·:;. \

·. '<: . · ........ / .·

.

.. .. : .;.

54. Minimum monitoring requirement for single near- 58.13(c)(3) Yes, Detailed site Yes None required

road NOz monitor (in CBSA > 1 million) by 1/1/2014 App D4.3.2 information

55. Minimum monitoring requirement for second near- 58.13(c)(4) Yes, Detailed site Yes None required

road NOz monitor (in CBSA ::0:: 2.5 million) by AppD information

1/112015 4.3.2

8 Only monitors considered to be required SLAMs are eligible to be counted towards meeting minimum monitoring requirements. In addition, ozone monitors that do not meet

traffic

count/distance requirements to be neighborhood or urban scale (40 CFR 58 Appendix E, Table E-1) cannot be counted towards minimum monitoring requirements. 7 I 

### IANPrequirement56.1Minimummonitoringrequirementsforarea-wideN02monitorinlocationofexpectedhighestN02·concentrationsrepresentingneighborhoodorlargerscale(operationrequiredbyJanuary1,2013)57.1Minimummonitoringrequirementsforsusceptibleandvulnerablepopulationsmonitoring(akaRA40)N02(operationrequiredbyJanuary1,2013)58.1IdentificationofrequiredN02monitorsaseithernear-road,area-wide,orvulnerableandsusceptiblepopulation(akaRA40)NITORINGREQU1REMENTS59.IMinimummonitoringrequirementfornear-roadCOmonitor(inCBSA2:2.5million)by11112015!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!SOz-SPECIFICMONITORINGREQUIREMENTS60.MinimummonitoringrequirementsforS02[Note:OnlymonitorsconsideredtoberequiredSLAMsareeligibletobecountedtowardsmeetingminimummonitoringrequirements.]61.1NCoresiteandallrequiredparametersoperational:year-round03,traceS02,traceCO,NOy,NO,PM2.smass,PM2.scontinuous,PM2.sspeciation,PM10-2.smass,resultantwindspeedat10m,resultantwinddirectionat1Om,ambienttemperature,relativehumidity,andPbatCBSAs2:500,000.ICitationwithin40CFR58IAppD4.3.3IAppD4.3.4I58.10(b)(12)AppD4.458.10(a)(3);PbcollocationApp.A3.3.4.3;PM10.2.5minimummonitoringApp.D4.8;PM10-2.ssamplingschedule58.10(b)(4)Wastheinformationsubmitted?1Ifyes,page#s.Flagifincorrect2?INAINAINAYes,DetailedsiteinformationYes,DetailedsiteinformationDoestheinformationprovided3meettherequirement?4INAINAINAYesYesINotesNonerequiredWashoedoesnotmonitorforPbattheirNCoresite.NoPbisrequiredattheNCoresitesinceCBSApopulationis<soo,o"oo.8ANPrequirementCitationWastheDoestheNoteswithin40informationinformationCFR58submitted?1Ifprovided3meetyes,page#s.theFlagifrequirement?4incorrect2?58.12(£)AppD4.8;PM10.2.scollocationApp.A3.3.6IsiTEoRMONITOR-sPECIFicREQUIREMENTs(OFTENINcLUDEDINtABLEs)I.62.AQSsiteidentificationnumberforeachsite58.10(b)(l)Yes,DetailedsiteYesinformation63.Locationofeachsite:streetaddressandgeographic58.10(b)(2)Yes,DetailedsiteYescoordinatesinformation64.MSA,CBSA,CSAorotherarearepresentedbythe58.10(b)(8)Yes,DetailedsiteYesmonitorinformation65.ParameteroccurrencecodeforeachmonitorNeededtoYes,DetailedsiteYesdetermineifinformationotherrequirements(e.g.,min#andcollocation)aremet66.Statementofpurposeforeachmonitor58.10(a)(l)Yes,DetailedsiteYesinformation67.BasicmonitoringobjectiveforeachmonitorAppD1.1Yes,DetailedsiteYes58.10(b)(6)information68.SitetypeforeachmonitorAppD1.1.1Yes,DetailedsiteYesinformation69.Monitortypeforeachmonitor,andNetworkNeededtoYes,DetailedsiteYesAffiliation(s)asappropriatedetermineifinformationotherrequirements(e.g.,min#andcollocation)iaremet9ANPrequirementCitationWastheDoes theNoteswithin40informationinformationCFRSSsubmitted?11fprovided3meetyes,page#s.theFlagifrequirement?4incorrect2?70.Scaleofrepresentativenessforeachmonitoras58.10(b)(6);Yes,DetailedsiteYesdefinedinAppendixDAppDinformation71.ParametercodeforeachmonitorNeededtoYes,DetailedsiteYesdetermineifinformationotherrequirements(e.g.,min#andcollocation)aremet72.Methodcodeanddescription(e.g.,manufacturer&58.10(b)(3);Yes,DetailedsiteYesmodel)foreachmonitorAppC2.4.1.2information73.SamplingstartdateforeachmonitorNeededtoYes,DetailedsiteYesdetermineifinformationotherrequirements(e.g.,min#andcollocation)aremet74.DistanceofmonitorfromnearestroadAppE6Yes,DetailedsiteYesinformation75.TrafficcountofnearestroadAppEYes,DetailedsiteYesinformation76.GroundcoverAppE3(a)Yes,DetailedsiteYes-information77.ProbeheightAppE2Yes,DetailedsiteYesinformation78.DistancefromsupportingstructureAppE2Yes,DetailedsiteNoPMinstrumentsatallsitesshouldbegreaterthan2informationmetersfromanysupportingstructure.'79.Distancefromobstructionsonroof(horizontalAppE4(b)Yes,DetailedsiteYesdistancetotheobstructionandverticalheightoftheinformationobstructionabovetheprobeshouldbeprovided)80.Distancefromobstructionsnotonroof(horizontalAppE4(a)Yes,DetailedsiteYesdistancetotheobstructionandverticalheightoftheinformationobstructionabovetheprobeshouldbeprovided)10ANPrequirementCitationWasthewithin40informationCFR58submitted?1Ifyes,page#s.Flagifincorrect2?81.Distancefromthedriplineofclosesttree(s)AppE5Yes,Detailedsiteinformation82.DistancetofurnaceorincineratorflueAppE3(b)Yes,Detailedsiteinformation83.Unrestrictedairflow(expressedasdegreesaroundAppE,4(a)Yes,Detailedsiteprobe/inletorpercentageofmonitoringpath)and4(b)information84.Probematerial(NO/NOz/NOy,SOz,03;ForPAMS:AppE9Yes,DetailedsiteVOCs,Carbonyls)information85.Residencetime(NO/NOz/NOy,SOz,03;ForPAMS:AppE9Yes,DetailedsiteVOCs,Carbonyls)informationPublicCommentsonAnnualNetworkPlanWerecommentssubmittedtotheS/LITagencyduringthepubliccommentperiod?NoIfno,skiptheremainingquestions.Ifyes:•Wereanyofthecommentssubstantive?oIfyes,whichones?Doestheinformationprovided3meettherequirement?4YesYesYesYesYesoExplainbasisfordeterminationifanycommentswereconsiderednotsubstantive:•Didtheagencyrespondtothesubstantivecomments?oIfyes,wastheresponseadequate?NotesFormonitors<1Omfromdriplineofclosesttrees,theANPexplains"Treesarenotofsufficientheightandleafcanopydensitytointerferewiththenormalunrestrictedairfloworpollutantscavengingaroundthemonitoringpath.Atleast90percentofthemonitoringpathisatleast10metersfromthedriplineofthetrees."•DothesubstantivecommentsrequireseparateEPAresponse(i.e.,agencyresponsewasn'tadequate)?•Arethesectionsoftheannualnetworkplanthatreceivedsubstantivecommentsapprovableafterconsiderationofcomments?oIfyes,providerationale:11