alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Patrick A. Conmy, United States District Judge for the District

of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2386

___________ Mary E. Knight; Arlie Knight, * * Appellants, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Greentree Financial Servicing * District of North Dakota. Corporation, formerly known as * Green Tree Financial Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 5, 1999 Filed: March 11, 1999

___________ Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mary E. Knight and Arlie Knight appeal from the district court’s 1 dismissal withprejudice of their action against Greentree Financial Servicing Corporation. Having carefully reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the relevant law, we-2-

conclude the Knights & action was properly dismissed. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# MESAB A AIRLINE S DEPJCrirTTOR ]

••> ; 1 D

Aprill,201 0

ToddM
. Homa

n Directo r EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division , X-5 3 Office o f Aviatio n Analysi s Department

o f Transportatio n Roo m6417 1 40 0 7 * Street , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Docke t

DOT-OST-2001-10685
. Orde r Requestin g Proposa l fo r Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Laurel/Hattiesburg , Mississipp i Dea r Mr , Homan : I n respons e t o th e Department' s Order 2010-2-29 , Mesab aAviation , Inc. , doin g busines s a s Delt aConnection , i s enclosin g detaile dsubsidy proposal s for essential ai r

servic e fo r th e above-mentione dcities
. Th e followin g outline s th e proposal detail s utilizin g th e 34-sea t Saa b 34 0 aircraft
. Laurel/Hattiesburg

- Mississipp i Th e propose dPI B servic e reflecte dbelo w offers fourteen (14 ) weekl y round-trip s fromMemphis
. Th e require dannua

l subsidy fo

r thi s servic e wil l b e $1,398,798.00
.

Ori g ME M PI B ME M PI B Oes t

PI B ME M PI B ME M Dep t

9:2 0 11:1 8 19:2 0 6:0 5 Ar r

10:4 6 12:5 1 20:4 0 7:4 3 Equi p

XJSF 3 XJSF 3 XJSF 3 XJSF 3 Day s

Dail y Dail y Dall y Dall y

Pag e 1 o f 3 loo o BLU E GENTIA N ROAD , SUIT E 200 , EAGAN , M N 5512 IRef : DOT-OST-2001-1068 5 Mesab aAviatio n Inc
.

Delt aConnectio n provide s schedule dservic e betwee n Delta' s hub s andman y citie s throughou t

th e U.S
. Delta' s networ

k provide s thes e communitie s wit h convenient , single-carrier connection s t

o hundred s o f

flights i n th e U.S./Canadia n an dworldwide
. W e loo k

forwar dt o th e opportunit y t o continu e providin g essential air servic e t o th e al l th e customer s o f thes e communities
. ubmitted
. John Vr

- Spanje r Presiden t
Enclosure

Pag e 2 of 3Ref : DOT-OST-2001-10685 Mesab aAviatio n Inc
.

EA S servic e proposa l fo r

servic e t o Laurel/Hattiesburg , Mississipp i EA S Statio n Docke t Numbe r Hu b Roundtrip s per

wee k Completio n Facto r Tota l Passenger s Tota l Bloc k Hour s Tota l Departure s Passenge r Revenu e Othe r Revenu e Tota l Revenu e Pilot s Fuel Maintenanc e Aircraf t Tota l Direct s Tota l bidirect s Tota l Operatin g Inflatio n Rat

e allowanc e Profit Economi c Cos t Require dAnnua

l Subsid y Rate 0.75 %

5.0 % PIB

DOT-OST-2001-1068 5

ME M 1 4 97 % 24,07 5 2,05 4 1,41 6 $1,926,03 2 $60,87 4 $1,986,90 6 $490,64 0 $491,54 0 $737,00 7 $425,15 9 $2,144,34 7 $1,057,26 5 $3,201,61 2 $24,01 2 $160,08 1 $3,385,70 5 $1,398,79 8

Pag e 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7448]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday April 13, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7448 Filed 3-23-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerome JACKSON.

No. KA-9110.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 16, 1988.

*1082R. Jeffrey Bridger, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee. .

Sherry Watters, Orleans Indigent Defender Pro., New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before SCHOTT, BARRY and KLEES, JJ.

SCHOTT, Judge.

In our examination of this record for errors patent we noted that defendant’s presence when the calling, examination, challenging, impaneling, and swearing of the jury took place was not reflected in the minutes. Pursuant to our order the trial judge has filed in the record a per curiam in which she certified that defendant was indeed present at all phases of the trial. We hold that this is sufficient to remedy the defect in the minute entry.

We find no errors patent and defendant has assigned no errors for our review. Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Friday April 20, 2012.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

                        Surveillance, Enforcement Matters and a Rule Enforcement Review. In the event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-7450 Filed 3-23-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2005 (A) L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
Matthew A. JonesTitle:
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNI U.S.A., INC> (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig Daniel,
Vice-President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
              78o(d)); and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ CRAIG DANIEL
--------------------------
Vice-President
September 29, 2003


                                       47
#### Percy WASHINGTON v. DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES.

No. CA-6541.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

March 16, 1987.

Theon A. Wilson, New Orleans, for plaintiff.

George A. Blair, III, New Orleans, for defendant.

Before GULOTTA, BARRY and WARD, JJ.

GULOTTA, Judge.

Percy Washington seeks review of a decision of the Civil Service Commission of the City of New Orleans dismissing his appeal to the Commission after he was transferred from his former job at the Department of Utilities to a position under the Aviation Board because of the 1986 City budget cuts.

On February 5, 1986, the Department of Utilities notified Washington, that he was being transferred from his present job to a position under the Aviation Board effective February 17, 1986. On February 12, Washington expressed his wish to appeal his transfer by filing a printed City Civil Service form for an appeal from “disciplinary action”.

In response to Washington’s request for an appeal, the Department of Utilities filed an exception of no cause or right of action on the grounds that Washington was not entitled to appeal his job transfer because it had resulted from personnel reductions brought on by budget cuts and was not a “disciplinary action”.

Appealing from the Civil Service Commission’s dismissal, Washington argues *94that Civil Service Rule 4.1 affords an employee a right of appeal where he has suffered a reduction in pay. According to Washington, his job transfer to the Board of Aviation resulted in just such a loss of benefits and pay. We agree.

Civil Service Rule 4.1 provides as follows:

> “Regular employees in a classified service shall have the right to appeal to the Commission from dismissal, involuntary retirement, reduction in pay, demotion, suspension and fines.”

In *Fire Fighter’s Local 632 v. Civ. Ser. Com’n,*495 So.2d 958 (La.App.4th Cir.1986) writ denied 449 So.2d 84 (La.1987), this court construed the language of Rule 4.1 to afford a classified employee the right of appeal to the Commission in cases of dismissal or demotions whether they result from disciplinary action or from “lay-off actions mandated by budgetary constraints”. Based on our *Fire Fighter’s*decision, we conclude that an employee who is transferred to another job because of budget cuts is entitled an appeal to the Commission where he alleges that the transfer results in a reduction of pay or benefits.

Accordingly, the decision of the Civil Service Commission dismissing plaintiffs appeal is reversed and set aside. The matter is remanded consistent with the finding.

REVERSED AND SET ASIDE; REMANDED.
#### David Stone, Plaintiff, *v.*Ransel Trading Corporation, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

December 29, 1958.

*758
      *Milton S. Du Broff for*defendant.

*Seymour Friedman*for plaintiff.

Sidney A. Fine, J.

This motion for judgment on the pleadings, dismissing the complaint, is based upon the pleadings and plaintiff’s bill of particulars. The sole basis of the motion is the Statute of Frauds, viz., subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law. That section provides that any agreement or promise coming within any of its subdivisions is void unless some note or memorandum thereof be in writing, subscribed by the party to be charged or his lawful agent. The bill of particulars states that the agreements alleged in paragraphs third and fifteenth were oral, but there is no statement in the bill that there was no note or memorandum thereof, signed by the party to be charged, and the demand made no request for information as to whether there was such a note or memorandum. An agreement may be oral although there is a written note or memorandum of its terms. The memorandum may be entered into simultaneously or subsequently. There is no statement as to whether a signed note or memorandum of the agreement alleged in paragraph fifth existed.

In the absence of anything to indicate that the oral agreements alleged in paragraphs third, fifth, and fifteenth were not evidenced by a note or memorandum sufficient to satisfy the statute, there is no proper basis for dismissing the complaint as to said agreements.

It is to be noted that paragraph. 2 of the defense, which includes an allegation that there was no note or memorandum of the agreements sued upon, must be deemed denied, no order requiring a reply to the defense having been obtained.

Motion denied, but without prejudice to a motion to compel a reply and a renewal of this motion, after service of the reply, or a motion for a further bill of particulars, as to whether a note or memorandum existed, and a renewal on the basis of the original and further bills.
### `M-2^ 0 -4 fu v'1 - " ^0 )17 / A)" -n r \-A i

Iuoj

3 

### PQ /./1 ih'-S: 91,700



# -?OC - st/O/?c13 /D'-4 /^ 'W 

### 3 

## QC- 

## d2t^L W, 9001 - 33 07 

## 300 ^^-,71A/ NfJ2,1o92 p 44 17 b) - - 4--D J a "27Ua 

# T, ' U Q

# CI 71'/ 7 7 (9 7 (^osCv/c 

### ^Z^dc app - IJass-O(l sr1.J



## 6/ 

# 7 ?Y'H . Nr^2 /^^ r /'7Y -9 1 ^Yc'

, 

## 7 T-3 30(7 - ,F/vo/) 

### /C/ n07PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DRAFT ANALYSIS OF

ENERGY EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST

NAME AFFILIATION ADDRESS 6,

TELEPHONE JUNE 20, 1996 ) -' c LE -)



## R "hi 

## V/,^L I d - 3 s J6 3 a?- / FAX NO . 763 E-MAIL ADDRESS:PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DRAFT ANALYSIS OF

ENERGY EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST JUNE 20, 1996 NAME AFFILIATION ADDRESS 

# , C 7ZO

# 03 TELEPHONE E-MAIL ADDRESS: FAX NO.PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DRAFT ANALYSIS OF

ENERGY EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST JUNE 20, 1996 NAME AFFILIATION ADDRES S

TELEPHONE - FAX NO. E-MAIL ADDRESS:PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DRAFT ANALYSIS OF

ENERGY EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST JUNE 20, 1996

AFFILIATION ADDRESS t-'- -z NAME Cr

TELEPHONE - FAX NO. E-MAIL ADDRESS:PUBLIC WORKSHOP TO DISCUSS THE DRAFT ANALYSIS OF

ENERGY EFFICIENCY LEVELS FOR FLUORESCENT LAMP BALLAST JUNE 20, 1996 NAME AFFILIATION ADDRESS

TELEPHONE - FAX NO. E-MAIL ADDRESS:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00379

- CR

Jose Andres ROMERO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7424

Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE WATKINS

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 19, 2022.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Edward II, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Edward
Zimmerman, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Edward Zimmerman, Jr.
-------------------------
    Edward Zimmerman, Jr.
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer


Date  October 25, 2004
      ----------------



<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 332-524]

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Extension of date for transmitting report.

# SUMMARY:

                        Following the receipt of a letter on March 22, 2012, from the Committee on Finance of the United States Senate (Committee), the Commission has extended to April 26, 2012, the date for transmitting its report to the Committee in investigation No. 332-524,                         *Brazil: Competitive Factors In Brazil Affecting U.S. and Brazilian Agricultural Sales in Selected Third Country Markets.*

# DATES:

*March 22, 2012:*                         Receipt of the letter from the Committee.                    

*April 26, 2012:*                         New date for transmitting the Commission's report to the Committee.                    

## Backround

                    The Commission published notice of institution of the investigation in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 24, 2011 (76 FR 30195). In its original notice of investigation, the Commission indicated that it would transmit its report to the Committee on March 26, 2012. The notice is also available on the Commission Web site at                     *http://www.usitc.gov.*                     All other information about the investigation, including a description of the subject matter to be addressed, contact information, and Commission addresses, remains the same as in the original notice. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at                     *http://www.usitc.gov/​secretary/​edis.htm.*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 23, 2012.

James R. Holbein,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-7472 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 42 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 42

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
   should be issued by the United States Postal Service honoring the 
  members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 1999

   Mr. Robb submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
           referred to the Commmittee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp 
   should be issued by the United States Postal Service honoring the 
  members of the Armed Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

Whereas the Order of the Purple Heart for Military Merit, commonly known as the 
        Purple Heart, is the oldest military decoration in the world in present 
        use;
Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United 
        States to members of the Armed Forces who are wounded in conflict with 
        an enemy force or while held by an enemy force as a prisoner of war, and 
        posthumously to the next of kin of members of the Armed Forces who are 
        killed in conflict with an enemy force or who die of a wound received in 
        conflict with an enemy force;
Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7, 1782, during the 
        Revolutionary War, when General George Washington issued an order 
        establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the 
        Badge of Military Merit or the Decoration of the Purple Heart;
Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end of the War of the 
        Revolution, but was revived out of respect for the memory and military 
        achievements of George Washington in 1932, the year marking the 200th 
        anniversary of his birth; and
Whereas 1999 is the year marking the 200th anniversary of the death of George 
        Washington: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service honoring the members of the Armed 
        Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued in 1999, 
        the year marking the 200th anniversary of the death of George 
        Washington.
                                 <all>
```