alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7371]



[[Page 18879]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY


Meeting of the Regional Resource Stewardship Council

AGENCY: Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The TVA Regional Resource Stewardship Council (RRSC) will hold 
a meeting on Thursday, April 19, and Friday, April 20, 2012, to 
consider various matters.
    The RRSC was established to advise TVA on its natural resource 
stewardship activities. Notice of this meeting is given under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2.
    The meeting agenda includes the following:

1. Introductions
2. Updates regarding TVA's Natural Resource Plan implementation and its 
River Operations essential stewardship functions, including management 
of the river system, dam safety, navigation, and flood control
3. Presentation(s) concerning TVA's stewardship partnership strategy
4. Public Comments
5. Council Discussion and Advice

    The RRSC will hear opinions and views of citizens by providing a 
public comment session. The public comment session will be held at 9:30 
a.m., EDT, on Friday, April 20. Persons wishing to speak are requested 
to register at the door by 8:30 a.m. on Friday, April 20 and will be 
called on during the public comment period. Handout materials should be 
limited to one printed page. Written comments are also invited and may 
be mailed to the Regional Resource Stewardship Council, Tennessee 
Valley Authority, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, WT-11 B, Knoxville, 
Tennessee 37902.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, April 19 from 8 a.m. to 
11:45 a.m., and Friday, April 20, from 8 a.m. to noon, EDT.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Chattanoogan Hotel, 1201 
South Broad Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2708 and will be open 
to the public. Anyone needing special access or accommodations should 
let the contact below know at least a week in advance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beth Keel, 400 West Summit Hill Drive, 
WT-11 B, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, (865) 632-6113.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Bruce S. Schofield,
Vice President, Land & Shoreline Management, Tennessee Valley 
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2012-7371 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120-08-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 29, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00369

- CR

IN RE David Jermain HAWKINS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chap a, Justice

On June 18, 2015 , relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of m andamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion

will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on June 29, 2015

.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hav e hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29 day of June, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2015CR0290 and 2015CR0291, styled The State of Texas v. David

Jermain Hawkins , pending in the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Lori I.

Valenzuela presiding.
#### STATE ex rel. Robert L. SCHRAM v. Honorable JUDGE (UNKNOWN), 3RD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL FOR LAKE CHARLES, Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-2558.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Schram, Robert L.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 210600.

Granted. Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, is ordered to act on relator’s application for writs.
EXHIBIT 32.1(a)


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stanley P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:November 25, 2013/s/ ALLEN S. GREENEAllen S. GreeneChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ STANLEY P. WIRTHEIMStanley P. WirtheimChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker licenses and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License No.
Port nameMax Verne Lund
13241
Los Angeles.Robert Hough
06509
New York.
 Dated: March 13, 2012. Richard F. DiNucci, Acting Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. 2012-6652 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**STEVEN JONES, JR.,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 947 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the**  Unpublished Memorandum and Order **of the Superior Court at No. 777 EDA 2015 exited November 13, 2015,**  affirming **the Order of the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-23-CR-0001881-2002 exited February 18, 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 12 th**  **day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal**

**is** GRANTED **on the issue of whether Petitioner’s sentence violates the prohibition**

**against mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders announced by the Supreme**

**Court of the United States in** Miller v. Alabama **, 567 U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).**

**As a result of the recent holding by that Court that** Miller **must be applied retroactively**

**by the States,** see Montgomery v. Louisiana **, 2016 WL 280758 (U.S. Jan. 25, 2016), the**

**Superior Court’s order is** VACATED **, and the case is** REMANDED **for further**

**proceedings consistent with** Montgomery.

**To the extent necessary, leave is to be granted to amend the post-conviction**

**petition to assert the jurisdictional provision of the Post Conviction Relief Act extending**

**to the recognition of constitutional rights by the Supreme Court of the United States**

**which it deems to be retroactive.** See **42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1)(iii).**

**Mr. Justice Eakin and Madame Justice Donohue did not participate in the**

**consideration or decision of this matter.**
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Francis Clarence Smith, Appellant.

County Court, Niagara County,

March 31, 1959.

*Anthony C. Ben*for appellant.

*William E. Earl, District Attorney (John R. Phelps*of counsel), for respondent.

Frank J. Kronenberg, J.

Defendant was convicted by a Justice of the Peace of the Town of Lockport of speeding and he appeals.

Defendant presents affidavits as to what went on at his trial (no stenographer was present) and affidavits contradictory of the defendant’s are made by the Justice of the Peace and the State trooper who was the complainant. The Justice’s- affidavit constitutes the return.

*768One point of difference is whether the Justice informed the defendant of the provisions of section 335-a of the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, the court is not concerned with this dispute because the summons which is annexed to the return contained instructions pursuant to the third paragraph of said section.

The affidavits presented on behalf of defendant alleged that the prosecution presented no sworn testimony. This is specifically contradicted by the affidavits of the Justice and the trooper. Under these circumstances, this court must accept the return as conclusive. *(People*v. *Prior,*4 N Y 2d 70.)

Defendant further contends that the trooper based his estimate of defendant’s speed only on the reading of an unchecked speedometer. As to this matter the affidavits of the Justice and the trooper are indefinite.

The court will hold the disposition of this appeal in order to give the defendant an opportunity to move under section 758 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for a further or amended return covering the manner in which the trooper arrived at his estimate. *(People*v. *Lanni,*10 Misc 2d 42.)

Defendant will please forthwith advise the court as to whether such motion will be made.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19154-19155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-113903-10]
RIN 1545-BJ59


Allocation and Apportionment of Interest Expense; Hearing 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed 
rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on proposed rulemaking 
that provides guidance relating to the allocation and apportionment of 
interest expense.

DATES: The public hearing, originally scheduled for April 3, 2012 at 10 
a.m. is cancelled.

[[Page 19155]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Funmi Taylor of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel 
(Procedure and Administration) at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-
reference to temporary regulations and a notice of public hearing that 
appeared in the Federal Register on Tuesday January 17, 2012 (77 FR 
2240) announced that a public hearing was scheduled for April 3, 2012, 
at 10 a.m. in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public 
hearing is under section 861 of the Internal Revenue Code.
    The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking expired on 
March 13, 2012. The notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to 
temporary regulations and a notice of public hearing instructed those 
interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit an outline of 
the topics to be addressed. As of Monday, March 26, 2012, no one has 
requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for April 
3, 2012, is cancelled.

LaNita VanDyke,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, 
Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2012-7609 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit
10.17(b)


 


AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment (this “Amendment”), is entered into as of March 12, 2020, by and between Brooklyn Immunotherapeutics
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Lynn Mason (the “Employee”),
and amends that certain employment letter agreement, dated as of October 30, 2018, by and between the Company and the Employee
(as amended, the “Existing Employment Agreement”).


 


AGREEMENT:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee arc parties to the Existing Employment Agreement; and


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Employee and the Company hereby agree that the Existing Employment Agreement
shall be amended as follows, effective as of the date of this Amendment:


 


A.
Amendment.


 


1.
The definition of “Severance Payments” set forth in Section 5(a)(iii) of the Existing Employment Agreement is hereby
amended by replacing the words “three (3) months” with the words “nine (9) months”.


 


B.
Effectiveness. This Amendment shall be effective as of the date set forth above.


 


C.
Amendments and Modifications. This Amendment may not be amended or otherwise modified except by an agreement in writing
signed by each of the Company and the Employee.


 


D.
No Other Amendments. The Company and the Employee hereby agree that, except to the extent specifically amended hereby,
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed. Nothing contained herein shall constitute
a waiver of any provision of the Agreement.


 


E.
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed by the parties hereto in separate counterparts (including by way of facsimile
or other electronic transmission), each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed to constitute an original, but
all of which, when taken as a whole, shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


*****


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	COMPANY:
	 	 	 
	 	BROOKLYN
    IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    George P. Denny
	 	Name:
    	George
    P. Denny                               
	 	Title:	Manager



 


	 	EMPLOYEE:
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Lynn Mason
	 	Lynn Mason
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-05-204-CV

GAMESTOP, INC. AND GUION GREGG, III	APPELLANTS

	V.

RADIOSHACK CORPORATION	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 236TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellants’ “Unopposed Motion For Disposition Pursuant To Settlement Agreement.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellants, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 29, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1017

BRENDA Y. WILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA02-2225-PJM)

Submitted: October 1, 2004 Decided: November 24, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reuben Collins, LaPlata, Maryland, for Appellant. Christopher R.

Dunn, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Lanham,

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Brenda Y. Wills appeals from the district court’s order in

this action alleging that Wills sustained personal injuries as a

result of Wal-Mart’s negligence. We affirm.

Subsequent to the filing of the complaint, Wills’ attorney

sought, and was granted, permission to withdraw from representation

of Wills. A number of continuances were granted by the district

judge to allow time for Wills to retain other counsel, but no one

was ever hired. The district judge finally advised Wills of the

need for the court to move forward on the summary judgment motion

that had been filed by Wal-Mart. Wills was specifically warned

that a failure to respond would result in summary judgment being

entered against her. No response of any kind was ever forthcoming

from Wills. The district court then granted Wal-Mart’s motion for

summary judgment on September 23, 2003.

Later, when counsel had been retained, Wills moved to vacate

the grant of summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 59(e). This motion was denied by the district court on

October 30, 2003. A pro se notice of appeal was filed on

November 26, 2003, seeking reversal of the October 30, 2003 order.

We have reviewed this matter and find the appeal without

merit. We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
- 3 -

the materials before us and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from form
10-K at January 3, 1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such
financial information.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                            5,201,071
<SECURITIES>                                      1,008,171
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26,773,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                        373,000
<INVENTORY>                                      13,308,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 47,444,795
<PP&E>                                           51,355,772
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6,392,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  100,472,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14,483,108
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                            318,666
<OTHER-SE>                                       85,671,007
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    100,472,781
<SALES>                                          72,857,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 91,561,480
<CGS>                                            45,678,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    45,678,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 11,246,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  23,831,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9,460,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              14,371,928
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     14,371,928
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.44
                                            
                                    

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1


 


TERM LOAN A NOTE


 


	 	November 17, 2020
	$10,500,000	Stamford, Connecticut


 


The undersigned, for
value received, promises to pay to the order of POST ROAD SPECIAL OPPORTUNITY FUND II LP, a Delaware limited partnership
(the “Lender”), at the principal office of Post Road Administrative LLC (the “Administrative Agent”)
in Stamford, Connecticut the aggregate unpaid amount of all Closing Date Loans made to the undersigned by the Lender pursuant to
the Credit Agreement referred to below (as shown on the schedule attached hereto (and any continuation thereof) or in the records
of the Lender), such principal amount to be payable on the dates set forth in the Credit Agreement.


 


The undersigned further
promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Closing Date Loan from the date of such Closing Date Loan until
such Closing Date Loan is paid in full, payable at the rate(s) and at the time(s) set forth herein and in the Credit Agreement.
Payments of both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America.


 


The unpaid principal
amount of Term Loan A shall bear interest for the period commencing on the Closing Date through the date Term Loan A is Paid in
Full in cash or same day funds at a rate equal to LIBOR (with a set Interest Period) plus 12.0% per annum; provided, however, that
the Obligations may bear interest at the Default Rate pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Credit Agreement; provided further, that the
undersigned may elect to defer until the Maturity Date payment of accrued and unpaid interest on Term Loan A pursuant to Section
3.3 of the Credit Agreement; provided further, that premium amounts on Term Loan A may be due pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Credit
Agreement.


 


All Obligations shall
be due and payable on the earlier of (A) November 17, 2024, or (B) the date to which the Obligations are accelerated pursuant
to ARTICLE XIII of the Credit Agreement.


 


This Term Loan A Note
(this “Note”) evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and provisions of, the Credit
Agreement, dated as of the date hereof (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit
Agreement”; terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit Agreement), among the undersigned,
certain Persons (including the Lender) and the Administrative Agent, to which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement
of the terms and provisions under which this Note may or must be paid prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.


 


This Note is made under
and governed by the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be performed entirely within such State.


 


[Signature page follows.]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Company has caused this Note to be duly executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer as of the date first set forth
above.


 


	 	T3 COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
	 	a Nevada corporation
	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	                    
	 	Title:	 






 


Signature Page to Term Loan A Note