alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Zekovich, Alex

To: Gregasz, Attila; Kordzi, Joe

Cc: Cusick, Sean

Subject: RE: Tolk cooling system converison study

Date: Thursday, August 27, 2015 12:59:38 PM

Attachments: removed.txt

Hi Joe:

A couple of points.

Xcel had preferred option 4, which was denoted as “var. Sep(X) ND-W”. This is the “separate circuit”

 utilizing the natural draft tower.

Per your note to Sean (regarding the use of a “rough order of magnitude” indication of pricing for

 the system if someone asks from the public domain, you could say a single unit (supply and

 installed) could be anywhere between $60M and $110M: there is such a variation between designs

 (e.g., single circuit or separate circuit) and design targets (i.e., if you wanted a 60/40 or an 80/20),

 and even variations in pricing/labor between one year/region and the next, that it would be difficult

 to estimate without some analysis.

From: Gregasz, Attila 

Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:42 AM

To: Kordzi.Joe@epa.gov

Cc: Zekovich, Alex <Alex.Zekovich@gea.com>; Cusick, Sean <Sean.Cusick@gea.com>

Subject: Tolk cooling system converison study

Hello Joe,

Referring to the telephone conversation with Sean and Alex today, I hereby would like to send you

 the redacted and unredacted version of the above mentioned cooling system conversion study for

 your reference.

Please bear in mind that the price numbers were based on 2012 price level and contains

 assumptions to a certain extent.

Best regards,

Attila Gregasz

Business Development Manager

GEA EGI Contracting/Engineering Co. Ltd.

Phone +36 1 225 6199, Fax +36 1 225 6193

Mobile +36 30 632 1339
attila.gregasz@gea.com

www.brand-change.com

emailsignatur

4-20 Irinyi J. Str, Science Park, Bldg."B", Budapest, H-1117, Hungary; Postal Address: P.O. Box 192, Budapest, H-1507, Hungary

Registered Office: Budapest; Court of Registration: Budapest Metropolitan Court, Cg. 01-10-041888

Executive Board: András Balogh (President & CEO), László Ludvig, Tamás Lelkes, János Hangyál

Confidentiality note

This e-mail, including any attachment, may contain confidential and privileged information. If you have received it by mistake, please

 notify us by reply e-mail and then delete this e-mail and any attachment from your system. Thank you!
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2396 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8- 

dihydroxy-4-nitro-5-(phenylamino)-. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 9,10- 

Anthracenedione, 1,8-dihydroxy-4-nitro-5-(phenylamino)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 9,10-ANTHRACENEDIONE, 1,8-DIHYDROXY-4- 

4 NITRO-5-(PHENYLAMINO)-. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.51 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8-dihydroxy-4-nitro-5- 

8 (phenylamino)-) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2396 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2
         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Au E-Mun hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Thai One On, Inc.,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Thai One On, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.
                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: August 14, 2005            /s/ Au E-Mun
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   By: Au E-Mun, Chief Financial Officer,
                                   Treasurer, Principal Accounting
                                   Officer and Director
# Solo

Flight Safety

Drones can be hazardou s if operated incorr ectly. If you are new to drones, we recommend learning on a mini-dr one to first learn the ropes. Ma ke safety your first priority, and always follow these best practices.



## Maintain Altitudes Under 400 ft.

Never fly above 400 ft. (120 m) , doing so places you in restric ted airspace
that can interfere with manned aircraft.

## Proper Handling

Spinning propellers can cause ser ious injury; always disarm bef ore handling the propellers. It is important to make sure that you and any s pectators keep a
safe distance from the drone. Don ’t take off with the drone fac ing towards you or fly directly over your head.


## Never fly within 5 miles of any airport.

To prevent conflict between you r drone and manned aircraft, alw ays fly at least five miles (eight kilomete rs) away from all airports and other locations
where manned aircraft are in use . Research your area to find al l areas of restricted airspace near you.

## Never fly above people.

Avoid flying above people at all costs. Always maintain at leas t 100 feet (30 meters) between your drone and people, vehicles, and buildings. This rule is important for flying near crowds, buildings, and roads due to p otential hazards from unpl anned landings.


## Keep clear of stadiums.

Recently mandated by the FAA , drones and other unmanned aircraft are strictly forbidden from flying near o r above stadiums.

## Avoid inclement weather.

Flying in inclement weather will result in abnormal flight beha vior. It is best
to wait for calm skies to avoid d amaging your drone and surroun ding
property.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 161 (Tuesday, August 20, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20179]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

32 CFR Part 199

[DoD-2010-HA-0072]
RIN 0720-AB41

TRICARE; Reimbursement of Sole Community Hospitals and Adjustment 
to Reimbursement of Critical Access Hospitals; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Thursday, August 8, 2013 (78 FR 48303-48311), the 
Department of Defense published a final rule titled TRICARE; 
Reimbursement of Sole Community Hospitals and Adjustment to 
Reimbursement of Critical Access Hospitals. Subsequent to the 
publication of the final rule in the Federal Register, DoD discovered 
two errors. This rule corrects these errors.

DATES: Effective October 7, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Fazzini, TRICARE Management 
Activity (TMA), Medical Benefits and Reimbursement Branch, telephone 
(303) 676-3803.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

0
1. On page 48308, in the first column, in the fifth and sixth lines 
from the top, ``Avera Queen of Peach'' should read ``Avera Queen of 
Peace.''
0
2. On page 48309, in Table 2, in the State column, in the first entry, 
``FL'' should read ``NC.''

    Dated: August 14, 2013.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2013-20179 Filed 8-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Agency announces its ongoing Priority Grant Competition. The Priority Grant Competition focuses on countries and themes as they relate to USIP's mandate. The Priority Grant Competition is restricted to projects that fit the topics identified for each priority area.

The Priority Grant Competition focuses on four countries and two themes.
      - Afghanistan
      - Iraq
      - Pakistan
      - Sudan
      - Communication for Peacebuilding—Participatory Digital Mapping, Local Media, and Community Engagement
      - Arab World Political Transformation

                        The specific topics for each priority area may be found at our web site at:                         *http://www.usip.org/​grants-fellowships/​priority-grant-competition.*

*Deadline:*                         The Priority Grant Competition applications are accepted throughout the year and awards are announced throughout the year. Please visit our web site at:                         *http://www.usip.org/​grants-fellowships/​priority-grant-competition*                         for specific information on the competition as well as instructions about how to apply.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        If you are unable to access our Web site, you may submit an inquiry to: United States Institute of Peace, Grant Program • Priority Grant Competition, 2301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037, (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 833-1018 (fax), (202) 457-1719 (TTY), Email:                         *grants@usip.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Grant Program, Phone (202) 429-3842, Email:                         *grants@usip.org.*

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Michael Graham, 

Senior Vice President for Management.

[FR Doc. 2012-7318 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
#### Ronnie COLE, Joyce Cole and David Preston Hall, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-1605.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

April 30, 1986.

Robert C. Hill, Fort Myers, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kim W. Munch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellants asserting their ineffectiveness of counsel claim pursuant to Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.
#### James Richard DUNBAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1445.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 16, 1988.

*1027James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Barbara L. Condon, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kevin Kitpatrick Carson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED on the authority of *State v. Payne,*404 So.2d 1055 (Fla.1981); *Franklin v. State,*526 So.2d 159 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); *Render v. State,*516 So.2d 1085 (Fla.2d DCA 1987).

SHARP, C.J., and DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer
of Tengtu International Corp. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 15, 2003

/s/ John D. Watt
--------------------
John D. Watt
President

/s/Judy Ye
--------------------
Judy Ye
Chief Financial Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tengtu International Corp. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter to Set Aside the Election of Directors of M. & O. Realty Corporation.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

December 4, 1958.

*563
      *John L. A. Bond*for petitioner.

*White Jb Walsh*for Edward V. Walsh, Jr., and others, respondents.

Cortland A. Johnson, J.

Although the moving papers are defective in many respects it clearly appears that the notice of the meeting held on November 17, 1958 was not given in conformance with the applicable statute.

A notice of a meeting for the purpose of electing directors was mailed on November 12, 1958 by the respondent owners of 50% of the stock. Presumably that notice was given under the authority of section 2 of the by-laws of the corporation. An examination of said section 2, however, reveals that the meeting therein provided for was to be called by the president after a request in writing by the owners of 50% of the stock, or by the majority of the directors. Here there was no president and there were no directors when the notice was mailed. It is the petitioner’s contention that at least 10 days’ notice of the meeting was to be given in accordance with section 45 of the Stock Corporation Law, but that section applies only to notices which are issued by the president, vice-president, secretary or assistant secretary. The meeting here was called by none of those officers. The only statute applicable to such situation is section 22 of the General Corporation Law which provides in part: ‘ ‘ if there be a failure to elect directors * * * a member may call a meeting for the election of directors by publishing a notice of the time and place of holding such meeting at least once in each of two successive weeks immediately preceding the election * * * and by delivering or mailing to each member, at his last known post-office address, a copy of such notice at least two weeks before the meeting. ’ ’ *(Matter of Bloch*v. *Gershman,*272 App. Div. 218.)

As the notice here was not published or mailed in accordance with section 22 of the General Corporation Law, the election of November 17 is declared void and all actions of the officers elected at that meeting are set aside as unauthorized. If the members consent, the court will fix a date for another election but absent such consent the respondents must follow the procedure stated in the aforesaid section 22.

Settle order on notice.
SFBC International - Exhibit 10.10






Exhibit 10.10




AMENDMENT

TO

SFBC INTERNATIONAL, INC.

2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN













Pursuant to Section 19 of the SFBC INTERNATIONAL, INC. 2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (the “Plan”), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:




1.

Section 12 of the Plan is amended by increasing the number of shares available to be granted under the Plan from 150,000 to 250,000.




2.

Except to the extent set forth above, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11369 Conference Calendar

MUQTASID A. QADIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; ALEXANDER C. KALMANOV; MCCONVILLE, Nurse; PETERSON, Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:97-CV-2

- - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999 Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. *
PER CURIAM: ** Muqtasid Qadir (TDCJ #743563) appeals the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of his pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) civil rights complaint wherein he alleged the denial of adequate medical. Qadir argues that the district court abused its discretion by (1) granting summary judgment without allowingNo. 97-11369 -2- him additional discovery; (2) denying his motion to compel the production of documents; and (3) denying his motion for a temporary injunction. With regard to Qadir’s first two arguments, we have reviewed the records and the briefs of the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we AFFIRM. See Qadir v. TDCJ et al. , No. 7:97-CV-002-X (N.D. Tex., Nov. 21, 1997). Qadir’s argument that the district court should have granted him a temporary injunction is MOOT in light of the district court’s dismissal of the complaint. See Cypress Barn, Inc. v. Western Elec. Co. , 812 F.2d 1363, 1364 (11th Cir. 1987).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  I, Richard J.  Carbone,  Chief  Financial
Officer of The Prudential Insurance Company of America,  hereby certify that the
accompanying  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2003,
containing  the financial  statements of The Prudential  Variable  Contract Real
Property  Account (a separate  account of The  Prudential  Insurance  Company of
America) and The Prudential  Variable  Contract Real Property  Partnership  (the
"Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The Prudential  Variable Contract Real Property Account
and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Richard J. Carbone
------------------------------------
Name: Richard J. Carbone
Title: Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2259 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on flumiclorac pentyl ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on flumiclorac 

pentyl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUMICLORAC PENTYL ESTER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.36 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 6 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 6

 Authorizing flags located in the Capitol complex to be flown at half-
  staff in memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk of the United 
                             States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 1999

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Authorizing flags located in the Capitol complex to be flown at half-
  staff in memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk of the United 
                             States Senate.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, as a mark of respect to the memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative 
Clerk of the United States Senate, all flags of the United States 
located on Capitol Buildings or on the Capitol grounds shall be flown 
at half-staff on the day of his interment.
                                 <all>
```