alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 342 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 342

   Designating the week beginning September 17, 2000, as ``National 
          Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2000

  Mr. Thurmond (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Bayh, Mr. 
    Bond, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Burns, Mr. L. Chafee, Mr. Cleland, Mr. 
 Cochran, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Edwards, 
  Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Graham, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Grams, Mr. Grassley, Mr. 
 Hatch, Mr. Helms, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Mack, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Roberts, 
Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Thompson, 
   Mr. Warner, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Craig, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Frist, Mr. 
  Jeffords, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
    Smith of Oregon, Mr. Specter, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Bunning, Mr. 
   Lautenberg, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Santorum, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Biden, Mr. 
Kerry, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Lott, and Mr. Robb) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 15, 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 17, 2000, as ``National 
          Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 105 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 17, 2000, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States and interested 
        groups to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies, 
        activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically black colleges and universities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I, G.J. Hart, ChiefExecutive Officer of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 26, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 2, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ G.J. HART                 |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   |                               |
|                      |   |   | G.J. Hart                     |
|                      |   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 210 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 210

             Recognizing and honoring the New York Yankees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 1999

 Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Lieberman) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
             Recognizing and honoring the New York Yankees.

Whereas the New York Yankees are one of the greatest sports franchises ever;
Whereas the New York Yankees are the winningest sports franchise in professional 
        sports history;
Whereas the New York Yankees have won 25 World Series, the most by any major 
        league franchise;
Whereas the New York Yankees have played 86 seasons in the city of New York;
Whereas the New York Yankees became a baseball icon in the 1950's by winning 5 
        World Series in a row;
Whereas the New York Yankees' dominance was ignited in 1920 by the appearance of 
        the indomitable Babe Ruth in pinstripes;
Whereas the New York Yankees have retired 11 numbers for 12 baseball legends;
Whereas the New York Yankees have had a player win the American League batting 
        title 9 times;
Whereas the New York Yankees are represented in the Baseball Hall of Fame by 16 
        players who were inducted wearing the distinctive New York Yankee cap;
Whereas the New York Yankees have fielded teams such as the 1927 ``Murderers' 
        Row''; and
Whereas the New York Yankees have finished the 20th century meeting the 
        standards they set throughout it: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. CONGRATULATION AND COMMENDATION.

    The Senate recognizes and honors the New York Yankees--
            (1) for their storied history;
            (2) for their many contributions to the national pastime; 
        and
            (3) for continuing to carry the standards of character, 
        commitment, and achievement for baseball and for the State of 
        New York.

SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF RESOLUTION.

    The Senate directs the Secretary of the Senate to transmit an 
enrolled copy of this resolution to the New York Yankees owner, George 
Steinbrenner, and to the New York Yankees manager, Joe Torre.
                                 <all>
```
#### Frank Lafaye KEITH v. M.B. BEARDEN, Commercial Union Insurance Company Ouachita Parish Police Jury and Comco Insurance Company.

No. 86-C-1097.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Keith, Frank Lafaye; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17738-CA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 83-893.

Prior report: La.App., 488 So.2d 1071.

Granted. Consolidate with 86-C-0936.
#### Tammye RACHAL v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

No. 86-OC-1260.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1986.

In re Transportation & Dev. Dept. of; applying for stay, writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-380.

Prior report: La.App., 489 So.2d 459.

Denied.
Order filed, July 11, 2019.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00237-CR

____________

RYAN COLEMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 337th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1619943

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 9, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Arlene Webb, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43999

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

BRUCE WAYNE COSTA ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 659

Filed: August 25, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. George A. Southworth , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twelve years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years, for aggravated battery, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Brian R. Dickson

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney Gen eral, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Bruce Wayne Costa pled guilty to aggravated battery . I.C. §§ 18

- 903(b) and 18

- 907(a)

and/or (b)

. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional ch arges were dismissed. The district court

sentenced Costa to a unified term of twelve years, with a minimum period of confinement of five

years

. Costa appeals.
Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review a nd the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing
the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Costa ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.







Date: September 2, 2011
By:
/s/ Matthew L. SchisslerName:
Matthew L. SchisslerTitle:
Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
#### Brod BAGERT v. Kerry Maybee GOLDSMITH. Frank D. FARRAR v. Kerry Maybee GOLDSMITH.

No. 87-C-1120.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Bagert, Brod; Farrar, Frank D.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. CA-3235, CA-3759; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 84-16379.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 648.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
Letter Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
  

					
	ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, LIP	  	 	  	ELLIOTT INTERNATIONAL, L.P.
	712 Fifth Avenue	  	 	  	c/o Bank of Bermuda (Cayman) Limited
	New York, New York	  	 	  	Strathvale House
	10019	  	 	  	North Church Street
	 	  	 	  	George Town, Grand Cayman
	 	  	 	  	Cayman Islands, B.W.I.
			
	 	  	 	  	August 5, 2005

  
 ISCO International, Inc. 

1001 Cambridge Drive 
 Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007 
 Attention: Frank Cesario 
  
 Dear Frank: 
  
 In response to your demand letter
dated August 3, 2005 (“Demand Letter”) for payment from each of Elliott Associates, L.P. and Elliott International, L.P. (together “Elliott”) for the return of short-swing profit amounts pursuant to Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), Elliott has calculated the short-swing profits owed by it under Section 16 of the Act to be as follows: 
  

				
	 Elliott Associates, L.P.:
	  	$	90,069.00
	 Elliott Internatinal, L.P.:
	  	$	223,192.00
	 	  	
	

	 Total:
	  	$	313,261.00

  
 By acknowledging below, the parties
agree that payment of the above amounts by Elliott to ISCO International, Inc. (“ISCO”) satisfies fully and completely all claims made by ISCO in its Demand Letter for the return of short-swing profits by Elliott under Section 16 of the
Act. Upon Elliott’s receipt of your acknowledgment, Elliott will fund the above amounts to ISCO. Upon ISCO’s receipt of the above funds, ISCO releases Elliott from any and all Section 16(b) claims resulting from the transactions referenced
in the Demand Letter. 






 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

									
	ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P.	 	 	 	ELLIOTT INTERNATIONAL, L.P.
					
	By:	 	Elliott Capital Advisors, L.P.,	 	 	 	By:	 	Elliott International Capital
	 	 	    as General Partner	 	 	 	 	 	    Advisors Inc.
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Attorney-in-Fact for
	By:	 	Braxton Associates, Inc.,	 	 	 	 	 	Elliott International, L.P.
	 	 	    As General Partner	 	 	 	 	 	 
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Elliot Greenberg

	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ Elliot Greenberg


	 	 	Elliot Greenberg	 	 	 	 	 	Elliot Greenberg
	 	 	Vice President	 	 	 	 	 	Vice President
				
	ACKNOWLEDGED BY:	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	ISCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	 	 	 	 	 
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Frank Cesario

	 	 	 	Date: 8/5/05
	Name:	 	Frank Cesario	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.            The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2.            The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: August 14, 2012 | By:       /s/ Xu Kecheng                                                    
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Name:  Xu Kecheng                                                           
|                      | Title:    President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
|                      |                                                                             









A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric
Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Matthew T. LEWIS v. SULPHUR MUNICIPAL FIRE AND POLICE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD.

No. 87-C-0813.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Sulphur Mun. Fire/Police Civ.Ser. Bd.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-141; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 84-4454.

Prior report: La.App., 502 So.2d 1162.

Denied.
#### STATE of Alabama ex rel. Sandra HILLMAN v. Alan RORER.

AV92000105.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

July 16, 1993.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 27, 1993.

William Prendergast and Mary E. Pons, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.

Daniel G. McDowell of Fine *&*McDowell, Russellville, for appellee.

ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.

This paternity proceeding began in 1984 pursuant to an action filed by the State of *657Alabama ex rel. Sandra Hillman, alleging Alan Rorer to be the father of a minor child born on September 12,- 1983.

Rorer filed an answer denying paternity, and he also filed a request for blood tests. Rorer’s request for blood testing was never granted; however, he was adjudicated to be the father of Hillman’s child on December 6, 1984, even though he appeared in court with the money to pay for the blood tests. Over the next several years during various proceedings, Rorer continued to request blood tests.

In 1991, after a change in trial judges, the new trial judge granted Rorer’s motion and ordered blood tests. The blood tests showed that Rorer could not be the father of Hill-man’s child.

Following further proceedings, Rorer was granted certain relief and, in effect, was found not to be the father of the child. The State of Alabama ex rel. Hillman filed a notice of appeal to the circuit court for a trial de novo. After appeal to the circuit court, Rorer filed a jury demand.

The State’s motion for summary judgment was denied, and the case proceeded to a jury trial. Following the taking of testimony from both parties, the trial court granted Rorer’s motion for a directed verdict.

The sole issue before this court on appeal is whether the doctrine of res judicata should have been applied in this case to prevent the retrial of the issue of paternity in circuit court. The State’s contention is that the doctrine of res judicata should have prevented the re-litigation of paternity.

We find that when the State appealed from the juvenile court to the circuit court for a tidal de novo, any res judicata defense was waived. As Rorer points out in his brief, when an appeal is taken from the juvenile court to the circuit court for a trial de novo, any error committed in the juvenile court is deemed to have been waived. *Alabama Equity Corp. v. Hall,*46 Ala.App. 143, 239 So.2d 215 (Ala.Civ.App.1970).

Also, § 12-15-120(a) and (b), Code 1975, provides that an aggrieved party, including the state, may appeal from a judgment of the juvenile court to the circuit court where the case shall be tried de novo. Trial de novo means a new trial in circuit court in which the whole ease is retried as if no trial whatever had been had in the juvenile court. *Alabama Equity Corp.; Black’s Law Dictionary*1349 (5th ed. 1979).

We find the State’s contentions to be without merit, and we hold that the judgment of the trial court is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

THIGPEN and YATES, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40106

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CR-184-1

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Antonio

Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Hernandez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s

brief, and Hernandez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
ACCEPTED12-14-00360-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS2/19/2015 2:41:16 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 247 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 247

 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 2000

  Mr. Campbell (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Burns, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
Coverdell, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Gramm, 
  Mr. Biden, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
 Hagel, Mr. Warner, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Helms, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
 Grams, Mr. Ashcroft, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Levin, 
 Mrs. Hutchison, and Ms. Collins) submitted the following resolution; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by 
   the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law 
                         enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of this country is preserved and enhanced 
        as a direct result of the vigilance and dedication of law enforcement 
        personnel;
Whereas more than 700,000 men and women, at great risk to their personal safety, 
        presently serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of 
        peace;
Whereas peace officers are the front line in preserving our children's right to 
        receive an education in a crime-free environment, which is all too often 
        threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;
Whereas 134 peace officers lost their lives in the performance of their duty in 
        1999, and a total of nearly 15,000 men and women have now made that 
        supreme sacrifice;
Whereas every year 1 in 9 officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 officers is injured, 
        and 1 in 4,400 officers is killed in the line of duty; and
Whereas, on May 15, 2000, more than 15,000 peace officers are expected to gather 
        in our Nation's Capital to join with the families of their recently 
        fallen comrades to honor them and all others before them: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes May 15, 2000, as Peace Officers Memorial 
        Day, in honor of Federal, State, and local officers killed or 
        disabled in the line of duty; and
            (2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe 
        this day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.
                                 <all>
```