alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,896,836
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      37,273,969
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 37,682,482
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     92,078,668
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,652,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             142,875,618
<DEPOSITS>                                 127,629,565
<SHORT-TERM>                                 2,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            964,536
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        4,198,435
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,810,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             142,875,618
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              8,103,829
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,979,394
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                58,712
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            10,141,935
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,923,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,754,679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,387,256
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,593)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,720,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,076,439
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,076,439
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,575,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.64
<LOANS-NON>                                    142,944
<LOANS-PAST>                                     8,850
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 70,738
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,463,181
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  157,448
<RECOVERIES>                                   197,111
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,652,844
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lorey DANIEL.

No. 89-K-0386.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KA-0476; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. *“K”,*No. 87-2293.

Prior report: La.App., 536 So.2d 796.

Denied.
**Exhibit
32.2**








**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
connection with the Annual Report of MC Shipping Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):







I,
Dominique Sergent, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.






March 18 ,
2005





Dominique
      SergentChief
      Financial Officer
Company Closed-cell Foam 

Product 

Blowing Agent Charge 

Arkema Forane® 142b/22 HCFC-141b/22 10 %bw 

Arkema Forane® 134a HFC-134a 9.3 %bw 

Dow Voracor CY 3053 Series - - 

Dow BLUECOR® Extruded 

Polystyrene Sheet

HFC-152a < 5% 

Dow FROTH-PAKTM 120 HFC 

Polyurethane Foam 

System

HFC-134a 5 – 10 % 

Dupont Formacel® Z-2 HFC-152a - 

Dupont Formacel® Z-4 HFC-134a - 

Dupont Formacel® S HCFC-22 1.194 g/cc 

Owens Corning Foamular® Extruded 

Polystyrene Insulation –

Zero Ozone Depletion 

Formula

- - 

Owens Corning Foamular® Extruded 

Polystyrene Insulation

HCFC-142b 7-12 %bw
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                          NABISCO GROUP HOLDINGS CORP.

     COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES/DEFICIENCY

       IN THE COVERAGE OF FIXED CHARGES BY EARNINGS BEFORE FIXED CHARGES

                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                             ----------------------------------------------------
                                                               1999       1998       1997       1996       1995
                                                             --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
<S>                                                          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Earnings before fixed charges:
  Income (loss) before income taxes........................    $526      $(134)      $636       $ 24       $511
  Less minority interest in pre-tax income (loss)..........     113         (6)       142         22        105
                                                               ----      -----       ----       ----       ----
  Adjusted income (loss) before income taxes...............     413       (128)       494          2        406
  Interest and debt expense................................     324        401        421        424        376
  Interest portion of rental expense.......................      34         30         28         26         23
                                                               ----      -----       ----       ----       ----
Earnings before fixed charges..............................    $771      $ 303       $943       $452       $805
                                                               ====      =====       ====       ====       ====

Fixed charges:
  Interest and debt expense................................    $324      $ 401       $421       $424       $376
  Interest portion of rental expense.......................      34         30         28         26         23
  Capitalized interest.....................................       2          3          6         15         10
                                                               ----      -----       ----       ----       ----
      Total fixed charges..................................    $360      $ 434       $455       $465       $409
                                                               ====      =====       ====       ====       ====
Deficiency in the coverage of fixed charges by earnings
  before fixed charges.....................................    $ --      $(131)      $ --       $(13)      $ --
                                                               ====      =====       ====       ====       ====
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.........................     2.1         --        2.1         --        2.0
                                                               ====      =====       ====       ====       ====
</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

75) IV-C-41 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed J1/13/2008 7:20:55 AM Sheet 75 of 232 
P.2 

A

 r 

m UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

\ ^SZ^r/ WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

*"t wo**0 

TAN 25 l*«l 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Robert L. Livingston 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Livingston: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. A. Vernon 

Brinson, President, Royal Oldsmobile, concerning EPA's proposal 

to require onboard refueling emission controls. Be assured 

that these comments will be considered in the next phase of 

our rulemaking process. We will also be placing them in the 

public docket for the rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

[,cc: Docket A-87-11
#### Susan McCULLOUGH, etc., et al., Appellants, v. CENTRAL FLORIDA YMCA, etc., Appellee.

No. 87-1392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 31, 1988.

Rehearing Denied April 26, 1988.

Scott L. Sterling, Orlando, for appellants.

Michael M. Bell of Hannah, Marsee, Beik & Voght, P.A., for appellant Shearer.

Thomas G. Kane of Kane & Degailler, P.A., Rockledge, for appellee The Ins. Co. of the State of Pa.

COWART, Judge.

An action was brought on behalf of children allegedly molested by an employee of a YMCA1 which was insured under a policy covering an “occurrence,” defined in part as

> an accident ... which results in bodily injury ... neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured.

From a summary judgment finding no coverage, this appeal results.

We affirm based on *Landis v. Allstate Insurance Co.,*516 So.2d 805 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), which follows Judge Frank’s dissent in *Zordan v. Page,*500 So.2d 608 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), *rev. denied sub nom., South Carolina Insurance v. Zordan,*508 So.2d 15 (Fla.1987), and express direct conflict with the majority opinion in *Zordan.**2*

It is now well understood that the specific intent of the classic child molester is to do an act to gratify his own warped sexual desires. If, before his act, the molester thinks at all about the possible effect his act has on the child, he normally rationalizes that his act will not cause bodily injury or other harm to the child. In any event, insurance coverage does not depend on the child molester’s “specific intent” to do or not to do bodily injury to the child. Regardless of the molester’s subjective speculation, expectation, or intent to cause or not to cause bodily injury to a molested child, *1209an intentional act of child molestation of a criminal character is not an accident.3

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

1

. The complaint alleges the YMCA employee "did act in a willful, wanton and reckless manner by sexually molesting" three young boys by fondling their genitals.

2

. *See generally*Annot., Construction and Application of Liability Insurance Policy Expressly Excluding Injuries Intended or Expected by Insured, 31 A.L.R. 4th 957 (1984).

3

. *See, e.g., Clemmons v. American States Insurance Co.,*412 So.2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA), 34 A.L.R. 4th 755, *rev. denied,*419 So.2d 1196 (Fla.1982).
#### STATE ex rel. Lloyd HESS v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-1110.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re Hess, Lloyd; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 179-541.

Granted. The case is remanded for an evidentiary hearing.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**I-LINK INCORPORATED**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

September 8, 2003

 

Theundersigned Gary M. Clifford, duly appointed and incumbent officer of I-LinkIncorporated, a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection with theCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.               TheReport is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Gary M.  Clifford    |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Gary M.  Clifford        |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Herman WELLS v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Joseph Puma.

No. 87-C-2159.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Wells, Herman; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0664; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 72-860.

Prior report: La.App., 510 So.2d 763.

Denied.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1225 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 269 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Opinion filed May 23, 2019

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-19-00140-CV

___________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.M., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 326th District Court

Taylor County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 8931-CX

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed in this court a motion to dismiss his appeal. In the motion,

Appellant indicates that he no longer wishes to pursue an appeal in this matter, and 

he asks this court to allow him to withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss his 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

The motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

May 23, 2019 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
# BORMATEC MAJA U A V

# AIRFRAME

Ma n ufacturer & name: Bo r matec Maja

W in g sp a n : 180 cm

L en g t h : 120 cm

W eig h t : 2. 9 k g

Endu r ance: ~45 min

# P O WER

M ot or : NTM Propd r i v e b r ushless

out r unner

Motor p ow er : 550 w

Propeller si z e: 11”x5.5

B a tt er y v oltage: 11.1 v

B a tt er y capacity: 6000 mAh

A vionics p ow er supp l y: 5 v / 3 A

# COMPONENTS

Video t r a n smit t er Aileron ser v o Wing lights

Elevator ser v o

GoPro HD came r a

Nose wheel ser v o B a tt er y Pitot tubes

(Ai r speed sensor)

# COMPONENTS

R u dd er

ser v o

Motor controller A vionics PSU Motor

# COMPONENTS

Control recei v er &

backup t elemet r y t r a n smit t er

T elemet r y

t r ansmitter GPS V oltage &

cu r ren t

sen so r s

Air pressure sen sor ( f or a i r sp eed ) Ard u P ilot

Mega

# CONT R OLLER

Light switch

Ena b le nose wheel

stee r ing

Throttle &

Rudder Flight mode select or :



## • S t a b ili z e



## • F l y b y wire



## • R et u r n to home

Ma n ual mode

o v e r r id e

Flaps & a irb r a k e

E levator &

a ileron s

T ouchscreen f or settings & t elemet r y data

# ARDUPIL O T MEGA

• Au t op ilot f or planes, copte r s, b oa t s.

.



# • O p en source & open hardware



# • B a sed on 8

- bit Atmel A Tmega2560

processor



# • 256 kB prog r am space (about half used),

8kB S R AM

, 4kB pa r ameter memor y



# • Nu merou s interfaces f or senso r s & ser v os Picture from Ardupilot Mega Wiki



# • Fa ilsa f e to o v e rr ide main processor

in case of malfunction

h tt p : // cod e

. g oog l e

. com/ p /a rd u p ilot

- meg a/

# SENSOR B O ARD

• C on t a in s senso r s needed f or

autonomous flight



# • 16M B “ b lack b o x” memor y f or

logging



# • U S B connector f or prog r amming

processor board & easy connectivity



# • Fi x es on top of Ardupilot Mega

- board

h tt p : // cod e

. g oog l e

. com/ p /a rd u p ilot

- meg a/ Picture from Ardupilot Mega Wiki

# DEVELOPMENT

• E a sy to get st a r ted with Arduino IDE



# • L ib r a r ies w r itten with C++ and compiled with gcc



# • C omp iled code is flashed to processor board via USB



# • New f eatures can be tested with hardware

- in

- loop

si m ulation using XPlane

- > no need to r isk real plane



# • No MM U

, no memor y allocations, no t h rea d s.

..



# •

... resou rces are limited, no single ope r ation m a y

e x ecute f or long pe r iod of tim e

, or use m uch memor y

.



# • C od e in pu b lic GIT rep osit or y

C om m un it y:

h tt p : //d iyd ron es. com

# • “AP M Mission p la nn er”

- sof t wa re recommen ded

, b ut not the on l y



# • O p en sou rc e

, prog r ammed with C # 

# G R OUNDS TA TION

• Au t op ilot com m unicates with open source M A Vlink

- protocol

choice

Picture from Ardupilot Mega W ik i
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 324

To commend and congratulate the Los Angeles Lakers for their outstanding

drive, discipline, and mastery in winning the 2000 National Basketball

Association Championship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself and Mrs. BOXER) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To commend and congratulate the Los Angeles Lakers for

their outstanding drive, discipline, and mastery in winning the 2000 National Basketball Association Championship.

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers are one of the greatest

sports franchises ever;

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers have won 12 National Basketball Association Championships;

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers are the second winningest

team in National Basketball Association history;

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers, at 67–15, posted the best

regular season record in the National Basketball Association;
2

•SRES 324 ATS

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers have fielded such superstars

as George Mikan, Wilt Chamberlain, Jerry West, Elgin

Baylor, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, Earvin ‘‘Magic’’ Johnson,

and now, Shaquille O’Neal and Kobe Bryant;

Whereas Shaquille O’Neal led the league in scoring and field

goal percentage on his way to winning the National Basketball Association’s Most Valuable Player award, winning the IBM Award for greatest overall contribution to

a team, and becoming just the sixth player in the history

of the game to be a unanimous selection to the All-National Basketball Association First Team;

Whereas Shaquille O’Neal was named Most Valuable Player

of the 2000 All Star game, scoring 22 points and collecting 9 rebounds;

Whereas Shaquille O’Neal dominated the 2000 playoffs averaging 38 points per game and winning the Most Valuable

Player award in the National Basketball Association

Finals;

Whereas Kobe Bryant overcame injuries to average more

than 22 points a game in the regular season and be

named to the National Basketball Association All-Defensive First Team;

Whereas Kobe Bryant’s 8-point performance in the overtime

of Game 4 led the Los Angeles Lakers to one of the most

dramatic wins in playoff history;

Whereas Coach Phil Jackson, who has won 7 National Basketball Association rings and the highest playoff winning

percentage in league history, has proven to be one of the

most innovative and adaptable coaches in the National

Basketball Association;
3

•SRES 324 ATS

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers epitomize Los Angeles pride

with their determination, heart, stamina, and amazing

comeback ability;

Whereas the support of all the Los Angeles fans and the people of California helped make winning the National Basketball Association Championship possible; and

Whereas the Los Angeles Lakers have started the 21st century meeting the high standards they established in the

20th century: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the United States Senate congratu2 lates the Los Angeles Lakers on winning the 2000 Na3 tional Basketball Association Championship Title.

Æ
Project: 14- 421

7900 Hickman Road, Suite 1 / Windsor Heights , Iowa 5032 4

515 - 725 - 9500 FAX 515 - 725 - 9501 877 -AIR- IOWA July 13 , 201 5 Stephanie Doolan Air & Waste Management Division Air Planning and Development Branch U.S. EPA Region 7 11201 Renner Boulevard Lenexa, KS 66219 Subject: Project Number 14 -421 ; Plant No. 78 - 01 - 0 12

Griffin Pipe Products Co.

– Council Bluffs, IA Dear M s . Doolan : Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that is being published in The Daily Nonpareil. This public notice is in re gards to 

### Griffin Pipes Products’ construction permit application for the cupola at their facility . The purpose of this application is to establish lead emission limitations in response to the nonattainment designation published in the Federal Register on November 22, 2011 (76 FR 72097) . The Department is proceeding with the permitting process for the cupola located at 260 1 9 th Avenue, Council Bluffs , IA. This notice is being sent to you pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR 51.161 , which requires that specific notification of this public notice be given to you. Also attached are the other documents relevant to this project for permitting the cupola and establishing lead emission limits. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 515 - 725 - 9521 . Sincerely,

Shawn Corbin Environmental Engineer Construction Permits Section Air Quality Bureau Enclosures

– Notice of Intent, Technical Support Document, Draft Permit , Consent Decree & Permit Application