RoadwayLucydeButtsDepartmentofEnergyEnergyEfficiencyandRenewableEnergyEmail:metal_halide_lamp_fixtures@ee.doe.govEnergyConservationStandardsNoticeofProposedRulemakingforMetalHalideLampFixturesSeptember27,2013Source:LithoniaLightingDownlightMagneticBallastHigh‐BaySportsLightLow‐BayAreaFloodlightWall‐PackPost‐TopBollardCanopy2Welcome•Introductions(aroundtheroom)•RoleoftheFacilitator•GroundRules–Speakoneatatime.–Sayyournamefortherecord– therewillbeacompletetranscriptofthismeeting.–Beconcise– sharethe‘air‐time’.–Keepthefocushere– cellphonesonsilent;limitsidebarconversations.–Webinarparticipantsturnphoneonmute;‘raiseyourhand’toberecognizedtospeak.•HousekeepingItems•AgendaReview•OpeningRemarks3Agenda9:00– 9:10amWelcome,Introductions,OpeningStatements9:10– 10:00amOverview,Scope,MarketandTechnologyAssessment,ScreeningAnalysis10:00– 11:00amEngineeringAnalysis11:00– 11:15amBreak11:15– 11:45amEnergyUse,MarkupAnalysis,Life‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysis11:45am– 12:15pmShipments,NationalImpactAnalysis12:15– 1:15pmLunch1:15– 1:45pmManufacturerImpactAnalysis1:45– 2:15pmLCCSubgroupAnalysis,EmploymentImpactAnalysis,EmissionsAnalysisandMonetizationofEmissions,RegulatoryImpactAnalysis2:15– 2:45pmProposedStandard2:45– 3:00pmClosingRemarks4ListeningViatheWebcast•TheDepartmentisbroadcastingthismeetingliveovertheInternet.•DOEisprovidingthewebcasttoaccommodatestakeholdersthatareunabletoattendthepublicmeetinginperson.•Thewebbroadcastallowsstakeholderstolisteninandviewtheslides.•Allstakeholdersareencouragedtosubmitwrittencommentsafterthepublicmeeting.5PurposeofthePublicMeeting•Purpose‐Toinvitecommentonproposedenergyconservationstandardlevels;‐Topresentmethodologiesandcharacterizeresultsoftherulemakinganalyses;‐Todiscussspecificissuesrelatedtoeachanalysis;‐Toseekinputfrominterestedpartiesonmethodologies,assumptions,datasources,andresultsfromtheanalyses;and‐Todescribenextstepsintherulemaking.•CommentsfromParticipants‐Participantsareinvitedtoprovidesummarycommentsorstatementsandraiseadditionalissuesfordiscussion.6IssuesforDiscussionIssueboxnumberingcorrespondstothelistofissuesincludedintheNOPRnotice,availableat:http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE‐2009‐BT‐STD‐0018ThedeadlineforsubmittingcommentsisOctober21,2013.IssueBox:DOEwelcomescomments,data,andinformationconcerningthestandardsitisconsideringforMHLF.IssuesthatcorrespondtothoseraisedinDOE’spublishedmaterialwillbenumberedinaccordancewiththatmaterial.Whetherinvitedbyanissueboxornot,commentsarewelcomeonanypartofDOE’sanalysis.7HowtoSubmitWrittenComments•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheMHLFrulemakingby:– MetalHalideLampFixturesEnergyConservationStandardRulemaking,– DocketNumberEERE‐2009‐BT‐STD‐0018,and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN) 1904‐AC00.•Email:MHLF‐2009‐STD‐0018@ee.doe.gov•Commentperiodcloses:October21,2013,11:59PMEDTPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐2J1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐29458OpeningRemarksMeetingparticipantsareinvitedtoprovideopeningremarksorstatementsatthistime.9PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses10MetalHalideLampFixtureRulemakingScheduleMilestone DateFrameworkDocument December2009NoticeofPublicMeetingandAvailabilityofthePreliminaryTechnicalSupportDocumentApril2011NoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR) August2013FinalRule(projected)January2014200920102011201220132014201511EPCAFactors42U.S.C.6295(o)(2)(B)(i)directsDOEtoconsidersevenfactorswhensettingenergyconservationstandards:EPCAFactors DOEAnalysis1.EconomicimpactoncustomersandmanufacturersLife‐CycleCostAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis2.LifetimeoperatingcostsavingscomparedtoincreasedcostfortheproductLife‐CycleCostAnalysis3.Totalprojectedenergysavings NationalImpactAnalysis4.ImpactonutilityorperformanceEngineeringAnalysisScreeningAnalysis5.Impactofanylesseningofcompetition ManufacturerImpactAnalysis6.Needfornationalenergyconservation NationalImpactAnalysis7.OtherfactorstheSecretaryconsidersrelevantEnvironmentalAssessmentUtilityImpactAnalysisEmploymentImpactAnalysis12•Metalhalidelampfixture(MHLF)meansalightfixtureforagenerallightingapplicationdesignedtobeoperatedwithametalhalidelampandballast.•EISA2007prescribedthecurrentenergyconservationstandardsformetalhalidelampfixturessoldonorafterJanuary1,2009.(42U.S.C.6295(hh)(1))CurrentStandardsBallastType OperatedLampRatedWattageRange MinimumBallastEfficiencyPulse‐start150and500W 88%MagneticProbe‐start150and500W 94%Nonpulse‐startElectronic150and250W 90%Nonpulse‐startElectronic >250and500W 92%•Excludesfromthestandardsfixtures:–Withregulated‐lagballasts;–Withelectronicballaststhatoperateat480volts;and–Thatareratedonlyfor150Wlamps,ratedforuseinwetlocations,andcontainaballastthatisratedtooperateattemperaturesabove50°C.13•DOEconsideredadditionalmetalhalidelampfixturesforcoverageundertheauthorityof42U.S.C.6295(hh)(2)(A).•ThisNOPRproposestomaintaintheexemptionsfromEISAforfixtures:–Withregulated‐lagballasts;and–Withelectronicballaststhatoperateat480volts.•ThisNOPRproposestoexpandcoveragetoincludefixtures:–Thataredesignedtooperateballastsratedfrom50Wto2000W;and–Thatareratedonlyfor150Wlamps,ratedforuseinwetlocations,andcontainaballastthatisratedtooperateattemperaturesabove50°C.ScopeofCoverage:CriteriaIssue2:DOEseekscommentontheexclusionofdedicated480Velectronicballastsinthescopeofthisrulemaking.Issue1:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofcontinuingtheexemptionofregulated‐lagballasts.14SystemApproachDOEconsideredthreesystemapproachesasalternativestoregulatingonlyballastefficiency:•Lampandballastsystemapproach―Couldbeburdensomeduetocompatibilityandcomplianceissues;―Couldrequireutilitiestokeeplargerstock;and―Onceoriginallampfails,lampscouldbereplacedwithlowerefficacyalternative.•Wholefixturesystemsapproach―Haspotentialtosavemoreenergy,butcurrentmetricsareinadequateinassessingthefixturesincludedinthisrulemaking.•CaliforniaTitle20approach―Risksreducingenergysavingsandcomplicatingcomplianceandenforcement;and―Requiringdimmingorcontrolsdoesnotensureenergysavingsandthisfunctionalityisnotwidelyavailableformetalhalidetechnology.15TestProcedureProposedChangestoTestProcedure•Specifyinputvoltageatwhichtotestbasedonballastwattage;•Specifytheinstrumentationrequiredtotesthigh‐frequencyelectronicballasts;and•Recordandroundinputandoutputwattagetothenearesttenthofawatt,andcalculateefficiencytothenearesttenthofapercent.Issue8:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofDOEtestingmetalhalidelampfixturesatasingleinputvoltage,basedonthelampwattageoperatedbytheballast.Issue7:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessoftheproposedamendmentstothetestprocedure,especiallythespecificationofinputvoltage,high‐frequencytestinstrumentation,androundingrequirements.Ballast WattageTestInputVoltage<150W120V,ifavailable≥150W277V,ifavailableWhendesignatedvoltagebasedonwattageisunavailableHighestavailablevoltage16PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses;17NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis18EquipmentClasses:Criteria•DOEestablishesseparateenergyconservationstandardsforeachequipmentclass.•DOEdividescoveredequipmentintoclassesby:–thetypeofenergyused;–thecapacityoftheequipment;and–Anyotherperformance‐relatedfeaturesthatrequiredifferentstandardlevels,suchasfeaturesaffectingconsumerutility.19EquipmentClasses:InputVoltage•DOEproposesseparateequipmentclassesforballaststestedat480Vandballaststestedatallothervoltagesinaccordancewiththetestprocedures.•ImpactonEfficiency–Dedicated480Vballasts(testedat480V)arelessefficientthanquad‐voltageballaststestedatthemostcommonvoltages(120Vor277V).•ConsumerUtility–Inputvoltagerepresentsafeatureaffectingconsumerutilityascertainapplicationsdemandspecificinputvoltages.Issue13:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofseparateequipmentclassesforballaststestedat480V(inaccordancewiththetestprocedure).20EquipmentClasses:Application•DOEproposesseparateequipmentclassesforindoorandoutdoorfixtures.•EffectonCost‐EfficiencyRelationship–Whiletheefficiencypotentialisthesameforindoorandoutdoorfixtures,theaddedprotectionrequiredforoutdoorfixturesaddsanincrementalcosttothefixture.–Theseincrementalcostsaffectthecost‐efficiencyrelationshipoffixturesforoutdoorapplications.•ConsumerUtility–Currentlythereisamarketreluctancetouseelectronicmetalhalideballastsinoutdoorapplications,particularlyduetoconcernswiththeelectronicballast’sabilitytowithstandvoltagetransientsandmoreextremetemperatures.–Itistechnologicallyfeasibletoaddressthetransientconcernswitheitheranexternalsurgeprotectiondeviceorinternaltransientprotectionoftheballast,andthetemperatureconcernswiththermalmanagementaddedtothefixture.21EquipmentClasses:Indoor/OutdoorDefinition•DOEproposesthatoutdoorfixturesbedefinedasthosethat:–areratedforuseinwetlocations;and–have10kVofvoltagetransientprotection.•Fixturesthatdonotmeettheserequirementswillbedefinedasindoorfixtures.WetLocations:DOEproposestodefinethewetlocationratingasspecifiedbytheNationalElectricalCode2011,section410.10(A)orUnderwritersLaboratories(UL)1598WetLocationListed.10kVVoltageTransientProtection:DOEproposestousethe10kVvoltagepulsewithstandrequirementfromANSIC136.2‐2004asacharacteristicuniquetooutdoorfixtures.Issue9:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofplacingindoorandoutdoorfixturesintoseparateequipmentclasses.22EquipmentClasses:Power‐EfficiencyRelationship•Ingeneral,aslampwattageincreases,ballastefficiencyincreases.•DOEempiricallydevelopedrelationshipsbetweenballastefficiencyandtheratedlampwattage.•Usinganequationhasthebenefitoverthebinnedapproach(constantefficiencystandardacrosseachwattagerange)usedinthepreliminaryanalysisbecauseitallowsforfairtreatmentofallwattageswithinanequipmentclass.LampWattagePower‐EfficiencyRelationship~BallastEfficiency23EquipmentClasses:LampWattage•DOEproposestoestablishseparateequipmentclassesformetalhalidefixturesbywattageranges.•ImpactonEfficiency–Overall,ballastefficiencyincreaseswithwattage.–EISA2007requiredballastsfrom150to500Wtobe88%efficient,sothemarketadjustedtothesenumbersanddisruptedtheexpectedtrends.•ConsumerUtility–Certainapplicationsrequiremorelightthanothers,sowattageoftenvariesbyapplicationandthusdirectlyaffectsconsumerutility.•DOEproposestoseparateequipmentclassesbywattagerangestoallowfordifferentequationstobeusedforeachwattagerange,asopposedtoonesingleequationspanningallwattages,because:–Wattage/efficiencyrelationshipscandiffersignificantlybywattage;and–Differentwattagesoftenserveseparateapplicationsandhaveuniquecost‐efficiencyrelationships.24EquipmentClasses*150WfixturespreviouslyexemptedbyEISA2007beincludedinthe>100Wandthe<150Wwattageranges,while150WfixturessubjecttoEISA2007standardscontinuetobeincludedinthe≥150Wto≤250Wrange.Issue16:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessoftheequipmentclassesproposedinthisNOPR.RatedLampWattage Testedat480V AllOthers≥50Wand≤100WIndoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor>100Wand≤150W*Indoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor>150W*and≤250WIndoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor>250Wand≤500WIndoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor>500and≤2000WIndoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor25ScreeningAnalysisBallastType DesignOptionsMagneticImproved CoreSteelCopperWiringIncreasedStackHeightIncreasedConductorCross‐SectionElectronicBallastElectronicImprovedComponentsMagneticsDiodesCapacitorsTransistorsImprovedCircuitDesign IntegratedCircuitsIssue18:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofthedesignoptionsselectedbythescreeninganalysisinthisNOPR.•DOEscreenedoutamorphoussteel,andtheremainingtechnologyoptionswerethendesignatedasdesignoptions.26PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses27NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis28EngineeringAnalysis:MethodologyDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClassesSelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisChooserepresentativeequipmentclassestostreamlinetestingandanalysisbasedprimarilyontheirhighmarketvolumes.Definecharacteristicsofbaselinemodelsineachequipmentclasswhichwillserveasreferencepointstoassesschangesduetoenergyconservationstandards.Identifymoreefficacioussubstitutesforeachbaselinemodelbasedondesignoptions.Developefficiencylevels(ELs)thatspantherangeofefficiencyfromthebaselinetothemaximumtechnologicallyfeasibleefficiencyforthatclass.Generatemanufacturerproductioncosts(MPCs)forballastsandfixtures,andthenapplyderivedmarkupstocalculatemanufacturersellingprices(MSPs).Scaleresultstoequipmentclassesnotanalyzed.ScaleToClassesNotAnalyzed29RepresentativeEquipmentClasses•Duetotheirlowshipmentvolume,DOEdoesnotdirectlyanalyzetheequipmentclassescontainingfixtureswithballaststestedat480V.•Theabove10equipmentclassesaretherepresentativeequipmentclassesanalyzed.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClassesRatedLampWattage NotTestedat480V≥50Wand≤100WIndoor Outdoor>100Wand<150WIndoor Outdoor≥150Wand≤250WIndoor Outdoor>250Wand≤500WIndoor Outdoor>500and≤2000WIndoor Outdoor30BaselineUnits•DOEfirstselectsrepresentativewattages,whicharetypicallythemostcommonwattagewithineachequipmentclass.•Thebaselinemodeltypicallyrepresentsthemostcommon,leastefficientmodelforeachrepresentativewattage.•Whenapplicable,thebaselinemodeljustmeetsexistingenergyconservationstandards.•ThebaselineservesasareferencepointfromwhichDOEmeasuresimpactsduetopotentialamendedenergyconservationstandards.•Insomecases,DOEselectsmorethanonebaselineforarepresentativewattagetoensureconsiderationofdifferentcustomereconomics.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses31BaselineUnitsSelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedWattage RangeRep.WattageBaselineBallastBallastTypeBallastEfficiency(%)≥50Wand≤100W70WMagnetic Pulse‐start 72.0ElectronicPulse‐start 88.0>100Wand<150W150W MagneticPulse‐start 81.2≥150Wand≤250W250W MagneticPulse‐start 88.0>250Wand≤500W400W MagneticPulse‐start 88.0>500and≤2000W1000W MagneticProbe‐start 91.8Issue22:DOEseekscommentontheadditionoftheelectronic70Wbaselineballast.DetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses32MoreEfficientUnits•DOEselectsmetalhalidelampfixtureswithhigherefficiencyballastsasreplacementsforeachbaselinemodelineachrepresentativeequipmentclass.•Thesehigherefficienciesareidentifiedby:–Examiningtestdatatoselectcommerciallyavailableballaststorepresenthigherefficiencylevels;or–Fillinginlargegapsofefficiencypresentintestdata(suchasbetweencommerciallyavailablemagneticandelectronicballasts) throughestimatingefficiencyincreasesduetotheuseofthedesignoptions.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses33EfficiencyLevels•DOEdevelopsELsbasedon:–thedesignoptionsassociatedwiththeequipmentclassstudied;and–themaximumtechnologicallyfeasible(max‐tech)efficiencyavailableforthatclass.•DOE’sefficiencylevelsarebasedoncatalogdata,independenttestdatacollectedfromcommerciallyavailableequipment,andmanufacturerinput.•DOEplottedballastefficiencyversusratedlampwattageforbothstandard‐andhigh‐efficiencyproductlinesfrommultiplemanufacturers.–Afterregressionanalysis,DOEfoundseveralrelationshipsthatbestmodeledtheobservedtrendbetweenratedlampwattageandballastefficiency.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses34ProposedEnergyConservationStandardEquationa)(Power‐lawequation)MinimumBallastEfficiency=஼భሺଵା஼మ∗௉಴యሻb)(Linearequation)MinimumBallastEfficiency=ܥଵ∗ܲ൅ܥଶc)(Constantequation)MinimumBallastEfficiency=ܥwherePistheratedlamppower,andCrepresentscoefficientsdeterminedbyDOEthatvarybasedonequipmentclass0.70.750.80.850.90.9510 200 400 600 800 1000

Ballast EfficiencyLampRatedWattageExampleEquationTypesa)Power‐lawequationb)Linearequationc)Constantequation35EfficiencyLevels:Graph50Wto500W65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Ballast EfficiencyLampRatedWattageEL4EL3EL2EL1EISA2007Level36EfficiencyLevels:Graph500Wto2000W90.0%90.5%91.0%91.5%92.0%92.5%93.0%93.5%94.0%500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000

Ballast EfficiencyLampRatedWattageEL1EL2Issue24:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessoftheefficiencylevelsproposedinthisNOPRandwhetherornotanadjustmentisneededforsourcesofvariationnotcurrentlycapturedbythismethodology.37BallastEfficiencyLevelsRepresentativeWattages70W 150W 250W 400W 1000W*BaselineCommerciallyavailable magneticCommerciallyavailablemagneticEL1CommerciallyavailablemagneticModeledmagneticCommerciallyavailablemagneticModeledmagneticEL2Modeledmagnetic– maxtechmagneticCommerciallyavailablemagnetic—maxtechmagneticEL3Commercially availablelow‐frequencyelectronicN/AEL4Commerciallyavailable low‐frequencyelectronic—maxtechComm.avail.high‐frequencyelectronic– maxtech*Adesignstandardbanningprobe‐startballastsinnewfixturesisconsideredintheNOPR38InputPowerRepresentations•DOEfoundthatasmetalhalidelampsage,theyrequirehighervoltages.•Whileelectronicballastshavethecapabilitytosensethatthelampvoltagehasincreasedandthendecreasetheoutputcurrentinordertomaintainconstantwattagethroughoutthelamplife,thewattageofmagneticballastsincreasesupto11%overlamplife.•Toaccuratelyreflecttheenergyuseoffixtures,DOEassumedthatthemagneticballasts’11%wattageincreaseoccursinalinearfashionoverthelifeoftheballast.Thiswasmodeledbymultiplyingtheratedlampwattageby1.055whencalculatinginputpowernormalizedtoratedlamppowerforallmagneticballasts.Issue21:DOEseekscommentontheanalysismethodofapplyinga5.5percentincreasewhencalculatingtherepresentativeinputpowerofmagneticballaststoaccountfortheincreaseinwattageoveraballast’slifetime.39DesignStandard•DOEispermittedtosetbothdesignandperformancestandardsforMHLFs.42U.S.C.6295(hh)(4)•Pulse‐startmetalhalidelampshaveincreasedlumenmaintenanceandhavehigherefficaciesthanprobe‐startlamps.BecauseofEISArequirements,probe‐startballastsareonlycurrentlyavailablefornewfixturesfrom500Wto2000W.•Areviewofcatalogsindicatesthat1000Wpulse‐startMHlampshave5.6%greatermeanlumenoutputthan1000Wprobe‐startMHlamps.Becauseoftheminimalballastefficiencydifferencesforprobe‐andpulse‐startballasts,thisgaininmeanlumensmustbeachievedthroughadesignstandard.•ThisNOPRthereforeconsidersbothperformance‐basedefficiencylevelstandardsandadesignstandardthatbansprobe‐startballastsinnewfixturesforcertainwattages.Issue26:DOEseekscommentonthedeterminationtoincludeadesignstandardthatwouldprohibitthesaleofprobe‐startballastsinnewlysoldfixtures,theproposedmethodsofanalyzingtheselevels,andthepotentialforlossofutilitythroughprohibitionofthesaleofprobe‐startballastinnewlysoldfixtures.40PriceAnalysis•DOEdevelopedpricesusing:–Teardowndata;–Retailpricesfromonlinedistributors;and–Aggregatedmanufacturer‐suppliedprices.•Adjustmentsfromthepreliminaryanalysisinclude:–Adjustingmaterialpricestobetterreflectcurrenttrendsbasedonmanufacturerinputandcommoditypricing;–Addingincrementalcoststofixturesutilizingelectronicballastsbasedonapplicationcharacteristics;and–Modifyingtheapplicationofmanufacturermarkupstoalignbetterwithexistingfixturecomponentmanufacturingchannels.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses41PriceAnalysis:IncrementalFixtureCosts•Indoorandoutdoorfixturescanachievethesameballastefficiencies.•However,electronicallyballastedfixtureshavedifferentMPCsdependingonwhethertheyareintendedforuseindoorsoroutdoors.15017520022525027530032535086 88 90 92 94 96

Total Fixture MSP ($)BallastEfficiency(%)400WIndoorvs.OutdoorCost‐EfficiencyCurveIndoorOutdoorMagneticballastsElectronicballastsElectronicBallastCostAddersIndoor OutdoorThermalManagement20%fixtureMPCincrease20%fixtureMPCincreaseVoltageTransientProtection‐‐$18.99fixtureMPCincrease120VAuxiliaryPowerFunctionality$0.75ballastMPCincrease‐‐42PriceAnalysisIssue28:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofthederivedMSPspresentedinthisNOPR.Issue27:DOEseekscommentontheapplicabilityandappropriatenessoftheaddertoMPCofelectronicballastsfor120VauxiliarypowerfunctionalityandtheadderstotheMPCoffixtureswithelectronicballastsforthermalmanagementandtransientprotection.43ScalingtoEquipmentClassesNotAnalyzedIssue25:DOEseekscommentontheproposaltoapplyascalingfactorof0.6percenttotheefficiencylevelsforquad‐voltballaststodeterminetheappropriatevaluesfor480Vballasts.•DOEdidnotanalyze480Vinputvoltageballastsdirectly,thusmakingitnecessarytodevelopascalingrelationshipforthisinputvoltage.•DOE comparedquad‐voltageballaststotheir480Vballastcounterpartsusingcatalogdataoverallrepresentativewattagesatvariousefficiencies.•TheaveragereductiontoballastefficiencyfoundbyDOEwas0.6%,thusDOEproposesapplyingthisscalingfactortotheefficiencylevelsforthequad‐voltballaststodetermineappropriatevaluesforthe480Vballasts.SelectBaselineUnitsSelectMoreEfficientUnitsDetermineEfficiencyLevelsConductPriceAnalysisScaleToClassesNotAnalyzedDetermineRepresentativeEquipmentClasses44TrialStandardLevels(TSL)TSLsConsidered intheNOPRTSL5 Maximumtechnologically feasibleefficiencylevelsTSL4 Maximumenergysavingswithpositive NPVTSL3MaximumenergysavingswithmaximumpositiveNPV– samestandardlevelsforindoorandoutdoorequipmentclassesTSL2Maximum technologicallyfeasiblemagneticballastELforeachequipmentclassTSL1 EL1forequipmentclasseswithpositiveNPV45EL/TSLMappingHighFrequencyElectronicLowFrequencyElectronicModeledMagneticCommercially‐AvailableMagneticTSL1 TSL2 TSL3 TSL4 TSL5≥50 to≤100WindoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL2 EL4outdoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL3 EL4>100to<150 WindoorEL1 EL2 EL4 EL4 EL4outdoorEL1 EL2 EL4 EL4 EL4≥150to≤250WindoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL2 EL4outdoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL2 EL4>250to≤500 WindoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL2 EL4outdoorEL1 EL2 EL2 EL2 EL4>500to≤2000WindoorEL1+DS† EL2+DS EL2+DS EL2+DS EL2+DSoutdoorEL1+DS EL2+DS EL2+DS EL2+DS EL2+DS†DS is a design standard that bans theuse of probe-start ballasts in new MHLF.Issue39:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofproposedtrialstandardlevels.46PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses47NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis48EnergyUseAnalysisEquipmentClassAnnual EnergyUse (kWh)*Baseline EL1 EL2 EL3 EL470W441/461 414/433 396/414 342/357 331/346150W879/878 848/846 824/822 733/732 721/720250 W1,349 /1,347 1,319/ 1,317 1,298/1,295 1,205/1,203 1,198/1,196400 W2,159/2,154 2,111/2,107 2,076/2,072 1,938/1,934 1,905/1,9021000 W7,025/5,163 6,582/4,837 6,539/4,806*ValuesaregivenasIndoor/Outdoor•Annualenergyuseiscalculatedbymultiplyingannualoperatinghoursbyper‐unitenergyconsumption.49MarkupsAnalysis•IndoorfixturesallpassthroughdistributionchannelA.•OutdoorfixturemarkupscalculatedasaweightedaverageofdistributionchannelsA,B,andC.DistributionChannel[Outdoor]PercentageBaselineMarkupIncrementalMarkupA 60% 1.39 1.19B 20% 1.13 1.13C 20% 1.00 1.0050PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses51NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis52LCC‐PBPAnalysisResults– TSL3EquipmentClassLocationEfficiencyLevelLCCSavings($)NetCost(%)NetBenefit(%)PBP(yrs)70WIndoor 238.41 0 100 4.2Outdoor 246.44 0 100 4.4150 WIndoor 410.14 23 77 4.7Outdoor 4112.51 26 74 10.5250WIndoor 213.12 31 69 11.8Outdoor 213.75 15 85 14.0400WIndoor 228.23 18 82 10.5Outdoor 230.47 7 93 12.31000WIndoor 2+DS*502.21 0 100 2.0Outdoor 2+DS*409.02 0 100 3.0•LCCsavingsarepositiveforallequipmentclasses,andthemajorityofcustomersexperiencenetbenefitsfromtheproposedstandard.*DSdenotesdesignstandard53PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses54NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis55ShipmentsAnalysisResults•DOEupdatedshipmentsbasedoninterestedpartycommentsandrevisedinputs.•Shipmentsdeclineovertheanalysisperiod.01,000,0002,000,0003,000,0004,000,0005,000,0006,000,0007,000,0008,000,0009,000,00010,000,0002010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045

Metal Halide Lamp Fixture ShipmentsYearHistoricandFutureShipmentProjectionsPreliminaryAnalysisShipmentsHighLow‐100,000200,000300,000400,000500,000600,000700,000800,000900,0002015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045

Annual ShipmentsYear70WattBase‐CaseShipmentsIndoor‐LowIndoor‐HighOutdoor‐LowOutdoor‐High56NationalImpactAnalysis•NESincreases,thendecreasesduetoothertechnologies(LED,fluorescent,etc.)beinginstalledinsteadofMHLF.•SimilartoNES,NPVincreasesovertime,thenlevelsoffanddecreasesduetodiminishingshipmentsanddiscounting.0.0000.0050.0100.0150.0200.0250.0300.0352015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045

Annual QuadsAnnualFFCEnergySavings(quads)57PublicMeetingSlidesTopics1Overview;Scope;TestProcedures;2Market&Technology;Screening;3Engineering;4EnergyUse;MarkupsAnalysis;5Life‐CycleCost&PaybackPeriodAnalysis;6Shipments;NationalImpactAnalysis;7MIA;NOPRAnalyses58NOPRRulemakingStageFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRuleMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseAnalysisShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsAnalysisLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisManufacturerImpactAnalysis59MIAOverview•Purpose‐Toassesstheimpactsofstandardsonmanufacturers;‐Toidentifyandestimateimpactsonmanufacturersub‐groupsthatmaybemoreseverelyaffectedthantheindustryasawhole;and‐Toexaminethedirectemploymentimpacts,manufacturingcapacity,andthecumulativeregulatoryimpactontheindustry.•Methodology‐Analyzeindustrycashflowandindustrynetpresentvalue(INPV)throughuseoftheGovernmentRegulatoryImpactModel(GRIM);and‐InterviewmanufacturerstorefineinputstotheGRIM,developsub‐groupanalyses,andaddressqualitativeissues.60MIAMethodology•Phase1‐DOEcreatesanindustryprofiletocharacterizethemarketandidentifyimportantissuesthatrequirefurtherinvestigation.•Phase2‐DOEpreparesanindustrycash‐flowmodelandaninterviewquestionnairetoguidesubsequentdiscussionswithmanufacturers.•Phase3‐DOEinterviewsmanufacturersandassessestheimpactsofstandardsbothquantitatively(usingtheGRIM)andqualitatively(impactsoncompetition,manufacturingcapacity,employment,andregulatoryburden).IndustryprofileDevelopstraw-manGRIM*DevelopinterviewguideInterviews&industrywide /subgroupanalysesAssess directemployment,competition,cumulativeburdensPhase2Phase3Phase161MIAKeyIssues•AbilitytoRecoupInvestments‐HigherstandardscouldhastentheswitchtoSSLtechnologiesandlimittheamountoftimeMHLFmanufacturershavetorecouptheinvestmentsrequiredtocomplywithstandards.•EfficiencyMetricUsed‐Aballastonlyefficiencymetriccouldoverlooksomeopportunitiesforenergysavingsfromlamps,fixtures,orcombinedlampandballastsystems.•Maintenanceof150WattExemption‐ManufacturersbelieveDOEshouldmaintaintheexemptionfor150Wonlyfixturesbecauseelectronicballastsarecurrentlylessreliableforoutdoorlocationsandinwetenvironments.‐Regulating150Wfixturescouldcauseconsumerstorevertbacktothe175Wfixturesbecauseofasignificantpriceincreaseofthe150Wfixturesandnegateanypotentialenergysavings.62MIAScenariosAnalyzed•DOEmodeledfourdifferentscenarios*‐Twoshipmentscenarios(low‐shipment&high‐shipmentscenario)‐Twomarkupscenarios(flatmarkup&preservationofoperatingprofitmarkupscenario)•Leastsevereformanufacturers– high‐shipment& flatmarkupscenario‐Manufacturersfullypassthroughadditionalcoststotheircostumersandthereisalessseveredeclineinmetalhalidefixtureshipments.•Mostsevereformanufacturers– low‐shipment&preservationofoperatingprofitmarkupscenario‐Manufacturersmaintainthesamelevelofoperatingprofitsinabsolutetermsinthestandardscaseasinthebasecaseandthedeclineinmetalhalidefixtureshipmentsismoresevere.*EachscenarioDOEmodeledusesoneshipmentscenarioandonemarkupscenario.63MIAINPVResults(BallastManufacturers)•High‐Shipment& FlatMarkupScenario(LeastSevere)•Low‐Shipment& PreservationofOperatingProfitMarkupScenario(MostSevere)Units BaseCaseTSL12345INPV (2012$millions) 123 123 126 127 127 159ChangeinINPV(2012$millions)‐0.8 3.3 4.5 4.7 36.5(%)‐0.7% 2.7% 3.7% 3.8% 29.8%ProductConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐9 12 13 14 20CapitalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐10 17 16 14 7TotalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐19 30 29 28 26Units BaseCaseTSL12345INPV (2012$millions) 103 86 77 77 79 79ChangeinINPV(2012$millions)‐(17.1) (26.8) (25.9) (24.8) (24.1)(%)‐ ‐16.6%‐25.9%‐25.0%‐24.0%‐23.3%ProductConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐9 12 13 14 20CapitalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐10 17 16 14 7TotalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐19 30 29 28 2664MIAINPVResults(FixtureManufacturers)•High‐Shipment& FlatMarkupScenario(LeastSevere)•Low‐Shipment& PreservationofOperatingProfitMarkupScenario(MostSevere)Units BaseCaseTSL12345INPV (2012$millions) 630 667 694 695 703 741ChangeinINPV(2012$millions)‐37.0 63.9 64.8 73.6 111.3(%)‐5.9% 10.2% 10.3% 11.7% 17.7%ProductConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐3 3 9 13 62CapitalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐0 0 6 10 75TotalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐3 3 15 23 137Units BaseCaseTSL12345INPV (2012$millions) 540 534 532 523 516 423ChangeinINPV(2012$millions)‐(6.1) (8.1) (17.3) (23.8) (116.9)(%)‐ ‐1.1%‐1.5%‐3.2%‐4.4%‐21.6%ProductConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐3 3 9 13 62CapitalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐0 0 6 10 75TotalConversionCosts (2012$millions)‐3 3 15 23 13765MIASmallBusinessImpacts•DOEidentifiedfivemetalhalideballastsmallbusinessmanufacturers.‐Threesmallbusinessesspecializeinhigh‐efficiencyelectronicballaststhatcurrentlymeetthestandardsproposedintheNOPR.‐StandardscouldcausetheothertwoballastmanufacturerstoeitherreducethenumberofproductsofferedorexittheMHLFmarketentirely.•DOEidentified54metalhalidefixturesmallbusinessmanufacturers.‐Approximatelytwo‐thirdsofthesesmallbusinessesprimarilyservethearchitecturalorspecialtylightingmarket.Becausetheseproductsusuallycommandahigherpriceandmargin,DOEbelievesthesefixturemanufacturersshouldbeabletopassonanynecessaryconversioncoststotheircustomers.‐StandardscouldcausetheremainingthirdoffixturemanufacturerstoeitherreducethenumberofproductsofferedorexittheMHLFmarketentirely.66MIAIssuesforCommentIssue43:DOErequestscommentonthepotentialimpactsofnewandamendedstandardsonthesmallmetalhalideballastandmetalhalidelampfixturemanufacturers.67LCCSubgroupAnalysis•DOEexaminedthreesubgroupsfortheLCCSubgroupAnalysis.1. Utilities–Maintenancecosts1.5timesthoseofthegeneralpublic2. TransportationFacilityOwners–Higheroperatinghours3. WarehouseOwners–Loweroperatinghours•ResultsareconsistentwiththemainLCC‐PBPanalysis.–Resultsarerobustwithrespecttovariationsinmaintenancecostsandthespecifiedoperatinghours68EmploymentAnalysis•DOEexaminedtheeffectoftheproposedstandardwithinthegeneraleconomy.AnalysisPeriodYearTSLNetNationalChange inJobs(Jobs)LowShipments HighShipments2017110 82‐30‐36376 734170 1685352 34620201376 3922511 5303791 82741,091 1,14252,336 2,44569EmissionsAnalysisandMonetizationofEmissionsTSL3TotalEmissions ResultsEmissionTypeLowShipmentsHighShipmentsCarbonDioxide/CO2‐(Mt) 48.5 65.0NitrogenOxides/NOX‐(kt) 65.6 89.5Mercury/Hg‐(t) 0.1 0.2Nitrous Oxide/N2O‐(kt) 0.9 1.3Methane/CH4‐(kt) 213.8 288.5Sulfur Dioxide/SO2‐(kt) 65.0 86.8•Cumulativeemissionsreductionsforequipmentsoldduringthe30yearanalysisperiod.Thebenefitsofcarbondioxide(CO2)andnitrogenoxides(NOX)emissionsaremonetizedusingarangeofdollarpertonconversions.–Ch.17oftheNOPRTSDcontainsthemonetizedvaluesforallTSLs,anddescribestheapproachformonetizingemissions.70RegulatoryImpactAnalysis•RegulatoryImpactAnalysis‐DOEanalyzed6non‐regulatoryalternativestoastandardwhichinclude:1. NoNewRegulatoryAction2. CustomerRebates3. CustomerTaxCredits4. ManufacturerTaxCredits5. VoluntaryEnergyEfficiencyPrograms6. BulkGovernmentPurchases— SeeCh.18oftheNOPRTSDforfurtherdetails71PotentialUpdatesforFinalRule•Inadditiontotime‐dependentupdatessuchaselectricitypricesandsalestax,therearefourparametersDOEisconsideringupdatingfortheFinalRule.1. Shipments— Newly‐releasedNEMAdataindicateHIDlampshipmentsarelowerthancurrentlymodeled— TranslatestoaslightlylowerstartingpointforMHLFshipments2. OutdoorOperatingHours— VerysmallshiftfromtotalaggregateHIDusetojustMHlampuse3. LaborRates— UseadditionalsourcesbesidesRSMeans(suchasSweets)whencalculatinglaborrates— Minorchangeinsomevalues– basedoncommentfromHIDrule4. DiscountRates— Smallchangerestrictingthescopeofcompanieswhosedataisusedincalculatingdiscountrates72ProposedEnergyConservationStandards‐TSL3RatedLampWattageTestInputVoltageMinimumStandardEquation(%)≥50Wand≤100W 480V99.4/(1+2.5P^(‐0.55))†≥50Wand≤100W Allothers100/(1+2.5P^(‐0.55))>100Wand<150W* 480V99.4/(1+0.36P^(‐0.30))>100Wand<150W* Allothers100/(1+0.36P^(‐0.30))≥150W*and≤250W480V For≥150Wand≤200W:88.0For>200Wand≤250W:6.010^(‐2)P+76.0≥150W*and≤250WAllothers For≥150Wand≤200W:88.0For>200Wand≤250W:7.0*10^(‐2)P+74.0>250Wand≤500W 480V 91.0>250Wand≤500W Allothers 91.5>500Wand≤2000W 480VFor>500Wto<1000W:0.994(3.210^(‐3)P+89.9)For≥1000Wto≤2000W:92.5,andmaynotutilizeaprobe‐startballast>500Wand≤2000W AllothersFor>500Wto<1000W:3.210^(‐3)P+89.9For≥1000Wto≤2000W:93.1,andmaynotutilizeaprobe‐startballast*150WfixturespreviouslyexemptedbyEISA2007areincludedinthe>100Wandthe<150Wwattageranges,while150WfixturessubjecttoEISA2007standardscontinuetobeincludedinthe≥150Wto≤250Wrange.†Pisdefinedastheratedwattageofthelampthatthefixtureisdesignedtooperate.73•Energy–Cumulativeenergysavings0.80– 1.1quadrillionFFC*Btus(quads)forequipmentpurchasedduringthe30yearanalysisperiod.•CostSavings–Cumulativenationalnetpresentvalue(NPV)=$0.95billion(7%discountrate(DR)),$3.2billion(3%DR).–Estimatedaveragelife‐cyclecostsavingsareapproximately$30forfixturesoperatinga400Wmetalhalidelampinindoorandoutdoorapplications.•EnvironmentalBenefit–Energysavedintheformofelectricitywouldresultincumulativegreenhousegasemissionreductionsof48.5‐65.0MtofCO2forequipmentpurchasedduringthe30yearanalysisperiod.–EstimatednetpresentmonetaryvalueoftheCO2emissionsreductionisbetween$0.33and$4.7billion.SummaryofProposedRuleImpacts*FFCdenotesfullfuelcycleenergy74ProposedEnergyConservationStandards‐TSL3Issue42:DOEseekscommentontheappropriatenessofchoosingTSL3energyconservationstandards.75HowtoSubmitWrittenComments•Inallcorrespondence,pleaserefertotheMHLFrulemakingby:– MetalHalideLampFixturesEnergyConservationStandardRulemaking,– DocketNumberEERE‐2009‐BT‐STD‐0018,and– RegulatoryIdentificationNumber(RIN) 1904‐AC00.•Email:MHLF‐2009‐STD‐0018@ee.doe.gov•Commentperiodcloses:October21,2013,11:59PMEDTPostal:Courier:Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,MailstopEE‐2J1000IndependenceAvenue,SWWashington,DC20585‐0121Ms.BrendaEdwardsU.S.DepartmentofEnergyBuildingTechnologiesProgram,Suite600950L’EnfantPlaza,SWWashington,DC20024Tel:202586‐294576Questions?