alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airwo rthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issu ed pursuant to **Canadian Aviation Regulation**  (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 6 25, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative me ans of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above

- referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport C anada, Ottawa, telephone 61 3 952

- 4357. 1 / 1 No

. CF - 201 4 - 30 Issue Date 5 September 2014

Number: CF - 201 4 - 30
ATA: 27 Type Certificate: A - 131 Subject: Flight Controls - Horizontal Stabilizer Trim Actuator (HSTA)

– Incorporation of New Airworthiness Limitations
Effective Date : 1 9 September 2014 Applicability: Bombardier Inc. model CL - 600 - 2B16 (604 Variant) aeroplanes, serial numbers 5301 through 5665 and 5701 through 5962

. Compliance: Within 30 days from the effective date of this AD , unless already accomplished. Background: A revision has been made to the C L 604 /605 Time Limits/Maintenance Checks (TLMC) manual, to introduce new tasks for the HSTA. Failure to comply with the TLMC tasks could lead to an unsafe condition. This AD is issued to ensure that premature wear and crack ing of the affected components are detected and corrected.
Correct ive Actions: A mend the Transport Canada approved maintenan ce schedule by incorporating tasks 27

- 42

- 01

- 109 and 27

- 42

- 01

- 111 as introduced in the Airworthiness Limitations Part 2, Section 5

- 10

- 40 , dated 11 July 2014, of the applicable CL 604 or 605 TLMC Manu al. The above referenced tasks contain phase

- in schedules, as required , for aeroplanes with HSTA that may have exceeded the initial task intervals. Compliance in accordance with superseding Temporary Revisions or later revisions of the above mentioned tas ks in Airworthiness Limitation Section of the CL 604 or 605 TLMC manual, approved by Transport Canada, also satisfies the requirements of this AD

. Authorization: For the Minister of Transport,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness
Contact: Gor danko Jeremic , Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613

- 952

- 4357, facsimile 613

- 996

- 9178 or e

- mail AD

- CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1 - 800 - 305 - 2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp
24

- 0022 (01

- 2005)
NO. 07-09-0142-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL A

	MAY 29, 2009

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF M.B.T., A MINOR CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 140TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2008-542,134; HONORABLE JIM BOB DARNELL, JUDGE

			_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant, John Anthony Streater, appeals the granting of the Attorney General’s Motion Dismissing John Anthony Streater’s Motion for New Trial.   We dismiss his appeal.

	On June 13, 2008, in the 140th Judicial District Court, a default order was entered in this cause establishing paternity and setting child support.  On July 23, Streater filed a motion for new trial.  Prior to the trial court’s ruling on Streater’s motion for new trial, parentage testing was conducted and indicated that Streater could not be excluded as the father of the child, the subject of this suit.  On February 6, 2009, the Attorney General’s Office filed a Motion to Dismiss John Anthony Streater’s Motion for New Trial contending that Streater had failed to take further action and had not made further attempts to resolve this cause since the return of the parentage testing.  The trial court granted the Attorney General’s Motion to Dismiss on March 6 for want of prosecution.  Streater received notice of the granting of the Motion to Dismiss on April 2 and filed his notice of appeal on April 30.1

	Upon accepting Streater’s notice of appeal, this court notified Streater on May 6 that the filing fee of $175 had not been paid and that, according to Rule 42.3 (c), failure to pay the filing fee within 10 days from the date of the notice could result in dismissal.  To date, we have had no response to the court’s request nor have we received payment of the court’s filing fee.

	We, therefore, dismiss the appeal.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).	

							Mackey K. Hancock

                                      					Justice

Do not publish.
#### Michael BOYCE, et al. v. DEPARTMENT OF STREETS.

No. 88-C-0117.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Streets, Department of; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7722, Civil Service Commission.

Prior report: La.App., 518 So.2d 20.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 3.3
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           THE NATIONAL REGISTRY INC.
                         -----------------------------


         THE NATIONAL REGISTRY, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify:

         That in compliance with Section 242 of the General Corporation Laws of
the State of Delaware, the Corporation's directors at a meeting of the Board of
Directors held May 8, 1996 and stockholders at the Annual Meeting of the
Stockholders held June 25, 1996, respectively, have adopted an amendment to
Article Fourth to the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation by deleting it
in its entirety and substituting the following language thereof:

                  "FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock
                  which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is
                  76,000,000 shares, consisting of (i) 1,000,000 shares of
                  Preferred Stock, $.01 par value per share (the "Preferred
                  Stock"), and (ii) 75,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par
                  value per share (the "Common Stock")."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE NATIONAL REGISTRY, INC. has caused its
corporate seal to be affixed hereto and this Cerificate to be executed by John
L. Gustafson, its President and Chief Executive Officer, and attested by David
I. Jacoby, its Vice President--Legal Affairs, this 2nd day of July, 1996.

                             THE NATIONAL REGISTRY INC.



                             By: /s/JOHN L. GUSTAFSON
                                -----------------------
                                Name: John L. Gustafson
                                Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


ATTEST:

   /s/ DAVID I. JABOBY
----------------------------------------------------
David I. Jaboby; Vice President--Legal Affair
[SEAL]
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended February 27, 2010 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                                                      |
|   |   |                                                                                     |
|   |   | Scott J. Miller*Chief Financial Officer*

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Date: April 9, 2010
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 09 3 . J AMES BRANDLEY BEARDEN v . THE STATE.

J am es Bran d l ey Beard en was co n v i ct ed b y a ju ry o f t wo co u n ts o f ag g rav at ed

s o d o m y

, t wo co un t s o f in ces t

, an d fo u r c o u n t s o f s ex u al bat t ery

. Beard en fi l ed a

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al

, arg u in g

, am o n g o th er t h i n g s

, t hat t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s ad m i s s i o n o f

p ri o r act ev i den ce u n d er OCGA § 2 4 -4 -4 1 3 (a) t o s h o w p ro p en s i t y v i o l at ed h i s ri g ht

t o d u e p ro ces s u nd er t h e Fo u rt een t h A m en d m en t o f t h e Un i t ed St at es Co n s t i t u t i o n.

Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed th e m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al . Beard en fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

.

Th e Su p rem e Co urt “ h as ex cl u s i ve ju ri s d i ct i o n ov er al l cas es i n v o l v i n g

co n st ru ct i o n of t h e Co n s t i t u t io n o f t h e St at e o f Geo rg i a an d o f t h e Un i ted St at es an d

al l cas es i n wh i ch t h e co ns t i t u ti on al i ty o f a l aw, o rd i n an ce, o r co n s t i t u t i o nal p ro v i s i o n

h as b een cal l ed i n t o q u es t i o n .” At l an t a In d ep en d en t S ch o o l S ys t em v. La n e

, 2 6 6 Ga.

6 5 7

, 6 57 (1 ) (4 6 9 SE2 d 2 2) (1 99 6 ) (ci t i n g Ga. Co n s t

. o f 19 8 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

II (1 )). Becau se t h e t ri al co u rt reject ed Beard en ’ s co n s t i t u t i o n al i t y arg u m en t

, i t

ap p ears t h at ju ri s d ict i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal m ay li e i n t h e Su p r e m e Co u rt

. As t h e

Su p rem e Co u rt has t h e u l t i m at e res p o n s i b i l i t y fo r d et erm i ni n g ap p el lat e ju ri s d i ct i o n, March 09, 2020s e e S

a x t o n v. Co as t al Di a l

ys i s & Med

. Cl in i c

, 2 6 7 Ga. 1 7 7

, 1 7 8 (4 7 6 SE2 d 5 8 7 )

(1 9 9 6), th i s ap peal is hereb y TRANSFERRED to t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i o n.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/09/2020
Sherry Oakman 

100 Singletree 

Stockbridge, GA 30281-4858 

March 7, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Retirees Support Delta's Haneda Application - keep the USA a Global Participant 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Delta Air Lines has snbmitted an application to provide new nonstop service from the U.S. to Tokyo's Haneda 

airport. As a retired employee ofDelta, I enthusiastically support this application. 

Under the new aviation agreement with Japan, Haneda will be reopened to U.S. carriers for the final time since 1976. 

Because of its convenient location near central Tokyo, Haneda is the preferred airport for business travelers. 

Delta employees, and many ofits retirees, have worked for many years to build Delta's business in Japan, and no 

U.S. airline has invested more in Tokyo than Delta. Delta has a strong record of competitive trans-Pacific service. 

Dut the reopening ofHaneda will put that investment and Delta jobs at risk ifthey are unable to compete. 

Delta's major competitors, the Star and oneworld Alliances, .l\ave Japanese partners that dominate service at Haneda. 

Delta, which does not have a Japanese partner, would be at a serious disadvantage unless it is given the opportunity 

to compete at Haneda. 

If Delta is provided with the Haneda slots they need. all three of the major airline alliances· SkyTeam, Star and 

oneworld • will be able to compete on a level playing field. that new competition would provide tremendous 

benefits for Delta's customers and Delta's employees. 

I urge you to approve Delta's application and provide the frequencies proposed to serve Haneda from Seattle, Detroit, 

Los Adge1es and HonolUlu.. 

Sincerely, 

... 

.~O~ :Sherry Oakman 

770·954-0166
Exhibit 11.1-Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 2,004          2,003           2002
                                              -----------------------------------------
<S>                                            <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC:

Average shares outstanding                     86,446,670     56,800,676     49,880,494

Net loss applicable
   to Common Shares                           (73,015,718)    (1,862,412)     1,578,108
                                              -----------------------------------------
Per share amount                                    (0.84)         (0.03)          0.03
                                              =========================================

FULLY DILUTED:
Average shares outstanding
  disregarding dilutive outstanding
  stock options and warrants
  and conversion of debentures
  for each year                                86,446,670     56,800,676     49,880,494

Dilutive stock options and
  warrants, based on the treasury
  stock method using the average
  market price                                  2,527,845      2,560,582      2,685,171

Floating convertible debenture                  1,149,054      1,500,000      1,500,000

Shares outstanding                             90,123,569     60,861,258     54,065,665
                                              -----------------------------------------

Net income(loss)                              (73,015,718)    (1,862,412)     1,578,108

Interest on Floating Convertible Debenture,
  net of taxes                                    268,572        201,758        201,368

Net income (loss) for fully diluted
   calculation                                (72,747,146)    (1,660,654)     1,779,476
                                              -----------------------------------------

                                              -----------------------------------------
Per share amount                                    (0.81)         (0.03)          0.03
                                              =========================================
</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Dustie Davenport

Appellate case number: 01-14-00956-CV

Trial court case number: 411333

Trial court: Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County

On November 26, 2014, relator, Dustie Davenport, filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus challenging the trial court’s March 27, 2013 and April 23, 2014 orders 

restricting her visitations of, and then barring her access to, Richard Lee Woodside, Jr. 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Marcia Pevey, respond to the petition 

for writ of mandamus, with specific attention to relator’s argument regarding personal 

jurisdiction. It is ordered that the response of any interested party, if any, shall be due 

within 30 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

  Acting individually 

Date: December 4, 2014
Simulated successive - night southward migration of H. zea from the Corn Belt in 1983
EXHIBIT 10.13


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                               ESSEX BANCORP, INC.
                          EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


         THIS  SECOND  AMENDMENT  TO THE  ESSEX  BANCORP,  INC.  EMPLOYEE  STOCK
PURCHASE PLAN is made as of the 1st day of October, 1998.


                                   WITNESSETH:


         WHEREAS,  Essex Bancorp,  Inc. (the "Corporation")  maintains the Essex
Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan"); and

         WHEREAS,  it is  necessary  and  desirable to amend the Plan to suspend
purchases of the Corporation's shares under the Plan.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective October 1, 1998 to
add new Section 27 to read in its entirety as follows:

                           27.    Suspension of Plan Participation and Benefits.

                                    Any   provision   herein  to  the   contrary
                  notwithstanding:   (a)  no  eligible   employee  may  commence
                  participation in the Plan on or after October 1, 1998; (b) any
                  payroll  deduction  elections  previously  made  by  the  Plan
                  participants shall  automatically be terminated and no further
                  contributions  shall be  permitted  under  the  Plan;  (c) any
                  amounts withheld from employee pay between October 1, 1998 and
                  December  31, 1998 to purchase  stock shall be returned to the
                  Plan  participants  from whom such amounts were withheld;  and
                  (d) no  shares  of Common  Stock of the  Corporation  shall be
                  purchased or issued  pursuant to the Plan on or after December
                  30, 1998.



<PAGE>



         IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,  the Corporation has caused this Second Amendment
to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 25th day of January, 1999.

                                         ESSEX BANCORP, INC.



                                         By:  /s/Gene D. Ross
                                            --------------------------
                                                  Its:  President
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7010]



[[Page 16890]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


 In the Matter of ProElite, Inc. and Universal Guardian Holdings, 
Inc.: Order of Suspension of Trading

March 20, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
ProElite, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended December 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Universal Guardian Holdings, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended September 30, 2007.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 20, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. 
EDT on April 2, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7010 Filed 3-20-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Back to Contents

EXHIBIT 10.3

|                                                        |        | Suite      2500, 1360 Post Oak      Houston, Texas 77056      P.O. Box 460047      Houston, Texas 77056-8047 |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |   |                                                                                                         |   |
| Principals**William B. Cline        Peter D. Gaffney** |   | Telephone:      Facsimile:      e-Mail: **    **                                    | (713) 850      9955      (713) 850 9966      gcah@gaffney-cline.com |
|                                                        |        |                                                                                                              |  |

| C 877/RMB/ralo/LT1069 | June 18, 2003 |
|-----------------------|---------------|

**CONSENT OF GAFFNEY, CLINE  & ASSOCIATES, INC.**

We consent to the reference to  us in Section 2.2.1.1 “Oil and Gas Reserves” in Repsol YPF, S.A.’s annual report  on Form 20-F (the “Form 20-F”) for the year ended December 31, 2002 and in Note  26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein. We also consent  to the references to us described above in the Registration Statements Nos.  333-12254 and 333-10668 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission into  which the Form 20-F will be incorporated by reference.

Very truly yours,

**GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES,  INC.**

Richard Bateman  Area Manager

|                |               |           |           |           |        |           |
|----------------|---------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|-----------|
| UNITED KINGDOM | UNITED STATES | SINGAPORE | AUSTRALIA | ARGENTINA | BRAZIL | VENEZUELA |

----
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      quarterly report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.




Date:
              August 10, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Peter
              H.
              EngelPeter
              H. EngelChairman and CEO
              (Principal executive
                officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael Dion MACK v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-2653.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied March 18,1988.

In re Mack, Michael Dion; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 309-111; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8920.

Granted in part. The trial court is ordered to furnish relator with his guilty plea transcript of September 20, 1985 in 309-111D, as previously ordered by the trial court. Otherwise denied. Much of the relief sought by relator was not applied for in the district court.