alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreements to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Copies of the agreements are available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     012037-003.                

*Title:*                     Maersk Line/CMA CGM TA3 Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     A.P. Moeller-Maersk A/S and CMA CGM S.A.                

*Filing Party:*                     Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I Street NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006-4007.                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would add Panama and Belgium to the geographic scope of the agreement, provide for the chartering of slots on a vessel string not previously covered by the agreement, revise the termination provisions of the agreement, and delete obsolete language from the agreement.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: March 23, 2012.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7453 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of ECCO Energy Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Samuel
M. Skipper, Chief Executive Officer, and N. Wilson Thomas, Chief Financial
Officer the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.




Date:
      December 19, 2008
                By:/s/
      Samuel M.
      SkipperName:
      Samuel M. SkipperTitle:
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      December 19, 2008
                By:/s/ N. Wilson
      ThomasName:
      N. Wilson ThomasTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 323 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 323

  Designating Monday, June 19, 2000, as National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-
                             Children Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2000

  Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Bryan, Mr. Kennedy, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Sessions, Mr. 
DeWine, Mr. Helms, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Schumer, and Mr. Inouye) submitted 
      the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Designating Monday, June 19, 2000, as National Eat-Dinner-With-Your-
                             Children Day.

Whereas the use of illegal drugs and the abuse of substances such as alcohol and 
        nicotine constitute the single greatest threat to the health and well-
        being of American children;
Whereas surveys conducted by the National Center on Addiction and Substance 
        Abuse at Columbia University have found for each of the past 4 years 
        that children and teenagers who routinely eat dinner with their families 
        are far less likely to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and alcohol;
Whereas teenagers from families that seldom eat dinner together are 72 percent 
        more likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, 
        and alcohol;
Whereas teenagers from families that eat dinner together are 31 percent less 
        likely than the average teenager to use illegal drugs, cigarettes, and 
        alcohol;
Whereas the correlation between the frequency of family dinners and the decrease 
        in substance abuse risk is well documented;
Whereas parental influence is known to be one of the most crucial factors in 
        determining the likelihood of teenage substance abuse; and
Whereas family dinners have long constituted a substantial pillar of American 
        family life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) recognizes that eating dinner as a family is a critical 
        step toward raising healthy, drug-free children; and
            (2) designates Monday, June 19, 2000, as National Eat-
        Dinner-With-Your-Children Day.
                                 <all>
```
#### Katherine D. LEWTER, Appellant, v. Larry D. LEWTER, Appellee.

No. 4-86-3059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Amy Shield Levine of Levine & Levine, Boca Raton, and Warwick, Campbell & Bannister, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Freeman W. Barner, Jr., of Freeman W. Barner, Jr., P.A., and Cromwell & Remsen, Riviera Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The mother of the minor child, whose marriage to the child’s father was dissolved in Florida in 1980, when all resided here, appeals from a November 1986 order which denies the mother’s motion for contempt based upon non-support by the father and which grants the father’s motion as to visitation.

We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order which denied the mother’s motion to hold the father in contempt.

However, we reverse and quash that portion of the order which addresses the father’s visitation with the minor child, because of the Florida court’s lack of jurisdiction. The child and mother had resided in Virginia for 5V2 years at the time of the hearing and order in this case; and the father had not resided in Florida since 1982, living first in Oklahoma and now in *48the state of Washington. *See Hegler v. Hegler,*383 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 288

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber of the United States

Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 12, 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the taking of a photograph in the Chamber

of the United States Senate.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole

5 and specific purpose of permitting the Senate Photo6 graphic Studio to photograph the United States Senate

7 in actual session on Tuesday, June 6, 2000, at the hour

8 of 2:15 p.m.

9 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au10 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements
2

SRES 288 IS

1 therefor, which arrangements shall provide for a minimum

2 of disruption to Senate proceedings.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1443

ERIC C. HANSEN,

Petitioner,

versus

CALDWELL DIVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; EMPLOYER’S INSURANCE OF WAUSAU; UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Division of Longshore

Harbors Workers; BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(BRB-98-1596)

Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric C. Hansen, Petitioner Pro Se. Stephen Edward Darling, SINKLER

& BOYD, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; Laura Jessica Stomski,

OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric C. Hansen seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s

decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial

of benefits pursuant to the Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Hansen

also appeals the Board’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decisions are based upon substantial evidence and are without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co., Inc., No. BRB-98-1596 (Sept. 7, 1999

& Feb. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.1

        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
        ----------------------------------------------------

     I, Steven M. Schneider, hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rotoblock
Corporation

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Rotoblock Corporaiton,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Rotoblock Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.

                                  Rotoblock Corporation,
                                  Registrant

Date:  September 14, 2005       /s/ Steven M. Schneider
                               --------------------------------------
                               By: Steven M. Schneider,
                               Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### Montier Unemployment Compensation Case.

Argued December 14, 1961.

Before Ervin, Wright, Woodside, Watkins, Montgomery, and Flood, JJ. (Rhodes, P. J., absent).

*Napoleon*Montier, appellant, in propria persona.

*Sydney*Reuben, Assistant Attorney General, with Mm *David*Stahl, Attorney General, for Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, appellee.

January 16, 1962:

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

In tMs unemployment compensation appeal the Bureau of Employment Security, the Referee and the *263Unemployment Compensation Board of Review all decided that the claimant was discharged as a result of willful misconduct and so denied benefits under §402 (e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 PS §802(e).

The claimant, Napoleon Montier, was last employed by Penn Fruit Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on January 17, 1961 as a produce back room porter at $2.361/4 per hour. He had been so employed for eighteen years.

The record shows, and the board so found, that a regular inspection of lockers disclosed the unexplained presence of certain items of the employer’s merchandise, still bearing price tags, in the claimant’s locker; that on his last day of work he was observed taking a soft drink from the icebox and admitted he did not pay for it; that he signed a statement that he did this on other occasions; and that he had known of the published rule that any employee who took merchandise without paying for it would be discharged. We are bound by these findings as they are supported by competent evidence. *Ristis Unemployment Compensation Case,*178 Pa. Superior Ct. 400, 116 A. 2d 271 (1955).

His conduct, even without the company rule, in appropriating company property to his own use, was a willful disregard of the standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect from his employee; and was such reprehensible conduct as to evidence a “conscious indifference to the perpetration of a wrong”; such conduct clearly constitutes willful misconduct under the law. *Gagliardi Unemployment Compensation Case,*186 Pa. Superior Ct. 142, 141 A. 2d 410 (1958).

Decision affirmed.
#### Don S.E. SHALHUB, Appellant, v. ANDREWS ROOFING & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee.

No. 88-266.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 6, 1988.

*1053Lionel Barnet, Miami, for appellant.

Barney Avchen, Hialeah, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a complaint seeking damages for breach of contract in the negligent inspection of a residence the plaintiff was contemplating buying. There was a jury verdict for the plaintiff of $22,577.28. The trial court entered a remittitur down to $5,000. There was no provision for acceptance of the remittitur or a new trial on damages only. The appellant contends, first that the trial court should not have entered a remittitur. We find no error on this point. *De la Vallina v. De la Vallina,*90 Fla. 905, 107 So. 339 (1926); *Cohen v. Margoa, Inc.,*281 So.2d 406 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); .Section 768.74 Florida Statutes (1987).

The appellant secondly contends that the trial court erred in not giving him the option of accepting the remittitur or having a new trial limited to the issue of damages. We agree. *Bom v. Goldstein,*450 So.2d 262 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Section 768.74 Florida Statutes (1987). Therefore, this cause is remanded to the trial court to enter an order giving the plaintiff therein a time certain to either accept the remittitur, or have a new trial on the issue of damages only.

Reversed and remanded with directions.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David J. Keefe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 5, 2008



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|    |  | David J. Keefe                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### SUCCESSION OF Edward B. LAUNIUS.

No. 87-C-0705.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Gallagher, Linda Launius — Other; applying for writ of certiorari, mandamus and review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-268; Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 24632.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 682.

Denied.
#### Roy McCULLUM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-436.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 6, 1986.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Helen Ann Hauser, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Steven T. Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

*126PER CURIAM.

On the only point raised for our consideration, we hold that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the prosecuting attorney, over the defendant’s objection, to play the defendant’s tape recorded confession to the jury during the rebuttal portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument where the recording itself had been admitted as evidence during the trial of the case and the replaying of it at this final stage of the proceedings was an appropriate response to the defense attorney’s closing argument. *See United States v. Guess,*745 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1984), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1219, 84 L.Ed.2d 360 (1985).

Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge:     (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: August 18, 2006   /s/ Richard J. Naughton    Richard J. Naughton      Chief Executive Officer  
 

 
**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Xenonics Holdings, Inc (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to herknowledge:     (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: August 18, 2006          /s/ Donna G. Lee       Donna G. Lee      Chief Financial Officer