alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tommy LEE, a/k/a Roland Danielson, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82CA0847.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Sept. 8, 1983.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 10, 1983.

Certiorari Denied March 26, 1984.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel W. Can-trick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Marie Volk Bahr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, James England, Claire Levy, Deputy State Public Defenders, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

BABCOCK, Judge.

The trial court revoked the defendant’s probation and imposed a four-year sentence to prison which had been suspended upon the granting of the defendant’s application for probation. The defendant spent 150 days in a work release program. The sole issue on appeal is whether the defendant is entitled to credit for time spent in the work release program.

*1031The defendant contends that the imposition of a work release program as a specific condition of probation pursuant to § 16-11-212(1), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), constitutes “confinement” for which he is entitled to presentence credit pursuant to § 16-11-306, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.). He argues that because he was committed to the Denver County Jail in conjunction with the work release program his case is distinguishable from our holding in *People v. Radar,*652 P.2d 1085 (Colo.App. 1982). We agree.

In *People v. Radar, supra,*we held that where residency in a community corrections facility is imposed as a condition of probation, it does not involve confinement as contemplated by § 16-11-306, C.R.S. 1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.). Section 16—11—212(1), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), provides that: “[Ujtilization of the county jail, a municipal jail, or any other facility may be used for the probationer’s full-time *confinement,*care, and maintenance, *except for the time he is released for scheduled work or education.”*(emphasis added) *Cf.*§ 17-27-101, et seq., C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.). Moreover, the trial court’s order for the work release program provided that the defendant was “remanded to the custody of the Manager of Safety and Excise and Ex-officio Sheriff of the City and County of Denver.”

We hold that where, as here, the trial court commits a probationer to a county jail or municipal jail as a facility utilized in conjunction with a work release program pursuant to § 16-11-212(1), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8), upon revocation of probation, the probationer is entitled to pre-sentence confinement credit for the *actual*time confined to the county or municipal jail.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Upon remand, the number of days of presentence confinement for which credit is to be given shall be calculated by dividing the total number of hours of actual confinement in the Denver County Jail by 24.

STERNBERG and TURSI, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 347 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 347

Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000, 
               as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 2000

Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Hutchison, Ms. Collins, 
  Mrs. Murray, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. Mikulski, and Ms. Snowe) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of September 17, 2000, through September 23, 2000, 
               as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week.

Whereas 1 out of every 55 women will develop ovarian cancer at some point during 
        her life;
Whereas over 70 percent of women with ovarian cancer will not be diagnosed until 
        ovarian cancer has spread beyond the ovary;
Whereas prompt diagnosis of ovarian cancer is crucial to effective treatment, 
        with the chances of curing the disease before it has spread beyond the 
        ovaries ranging from 85 to 90 percent, as compared to between 20 and 25 
        percent after the cancer has spread;
Whereas several easily identifiable factors, particularly a family history of 
        ovarian cancer, can help determine how susceptible a woman is to 
        developing the disease;
Whereas effective early testing is available to women who have a high risk of 
        developing ovarian cancer;
Whereas heightened public awareness can make treatment of ovarian cancer more 
        effective for women who are at-risk; and
Whereas the Senate, as an institution, and members of Congress, as individuals, 
        are in unique positions to help raise awareness about the need for early 
        diagnosis and treatment for ovarian cancer: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the week of September 17, 2000, through 
        September 23, 2000, as National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe 
        National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Week with appropriate 
        recognition and activities.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 123

To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of Candis

Ray v. John Edwards, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 15, 1999

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in

the case of Candis Ray v. John Edwards, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Candis O. Ray v. John Edwards, et

al., Case No. 99–CV–1104–EGS, pending in the United

States District Court for the District of Columbia, the

plaintiff has named as defendants Senator Trent Lott

and Senator John Edwards; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions relating to

their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 123 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent Senator Lott and Senator Edwards in the

3 case of Candis O. Ray v. John Edwards, et al.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael H. Lee, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the Quarterly Report of Tower Group, Inc. (the "Company")
     on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the Report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
     Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;

4.   The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
          by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which the Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
          procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in the Report any changes in the Company's internal control
          over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's first
          quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
          to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial
          reporting; and

5.   The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
     most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
     Company's auditors and to the audit committee of the Board of Directors:

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
          process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
          control over financial reporting.


/s/ Michael H. Lee
------------------
Michael H. Lee
Chief Executive Officer
May 9, 2005


                                       20
#### Barbara Ann BARNES, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Thomas Lee GAINES, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, Barbara Ann BARNES, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Helen P. SHEEHAN and The First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa, as Guardian of the Estate of Helen P. Sheehan, Appellants and Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 54112, 54165.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

June 20, 1983.

Deryl L. Gotcher, Graydon Dean Luthey, Jr., Tulsa, for appellant and cross-appellee Thomas Lee Gaines.

Joseph A. Sharp, Michael P. Atkinson, Tulsa, for appellee and cross-appellant Barbara Ann Barnes.

J. Warren Jackman, J. David Jorgenson, Tulsa, for appellants and cross-appellees Helen P. Sheehan and The First National Bank and Trust Company of Tulsa.

ORDER

Petition to grant review of the opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division No. 3, of March 15, 1983, 668 P.2d 1175, is granted for the limited purpose only of vacating the Court of Appeals reversal against Thomas Gaines, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, and to reinstate the trial court’s judgment against Gaines. In all other respects, petition for certiorari is hereby denied.
SURVEY PACKAGE CONTENTS

• A paper copy of the survey instructions 1; 

• A paper copy of the survey questionnaire 2; 

• A padded envelope 3 with a USB drive 4 containing an electronic version of the survey (which includes 

the same information as the paper copies of the instructions and the questionnaire); and 

• Mailing instructions 5 and materials to protect confidential business information 6, 7, and 8 for you to 

return your completed questionnaire to EPA in a prepaid, preaddressed UPS envelope 9. 

1 Paper copy of the

Survey Instructions

2 Paper copy of the 

Survey Questionnaire 3 Padded Envelope for USB drive

4 USB Drive with 

electronic version of survey

5 Instructions for Returning the 

Completed Questionnaire to EPA

6 Green Sleeve – use if returning a 

USB drive containing confidential 

business information to EPA

7 Green Cover Sheet – use if 

returning a paper copy of survey with 

confidential business information

8 Manila Envelope – use as inner

envelope if returning a survey with 

confidential business information

9 Pre-paid UPS Return Envelope
# Jornal Oficial C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 138I |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 63.° ano28 de abril de 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 138I

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

63.° ano28 de abril de 2020

---

| Índice | Página |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Comissão Europeia |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2020/560 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho que altera os Regulamentos (UE) n.o 508/2014 e (UE) n.o 1379/2013 no que respeita a medidas específicas destinadas a atenuar o impacto do surto de COVID-19 no setor da pesca e da aquicultura | 1 |

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

2020/C 138 I/01

Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2020/560 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho que altera os Regulamentos (UE) n.o 508/2014 e (UE) n.o 1379/2013 no que respeita a medidas específicas destinadas a atenuar o impacto do surto de COVID-19 no setor da pesca e da aquicultura

o

o

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Comissão Europeia

| 28.4.2020 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CI 138/1

---

Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2020/560 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho que altera os Regulamentos (UE) n.o 508/2014 e (UE) n.o 1379/2013 no que respeita a medidas específicas destinadas a atenuar o impacto do surto de COVID-19 no setor da pesca e da aquicultura

(2020/C 138 I/01)

A Comissão congratula-se com a rápida adoção pelo Parlamento Europeu e pelo Conselho da sua proposta de alteração do Fundo Europeu dos Assuntos Marítimos e das Pescas destinada a atenuar o impacto do surto de COVID-19 e ajudar os nossos pescadores e produtores aquícolas.

A Comissão gostaria de sublinhar que o controlo das pescas e a recolha de dados científicos são muito importantes para uma gestão sustentável das unidades populacionais assente nos melhores pareceres científicos disponíveis e num cumprimento efetivo das regras. A redução dos recursos financeiros que lhes são dedicados não deve comprometer os resultados destes elementos essenciais da política comum das pescas.

A Comissão deseja salientar que a sua proposta, bem como as alterações de que foi objeto, tem por fito fazer face à situação de crise única causada pelo surto de COVID-19 e satisfazer a necessidade de apoio excecional e imediato para ultrapassar as consequências desse surto e que não pode prevalecer sobre o futuro regulamento relativo ao Fundo Europeu dos Assuntos Marítimos e das Pescas.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Paul Kim, Chief Financial Officer of Cogent, Inc. (the
Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dated: November 8,
2007



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|                                                              
|/S/ PAUL KIM                                                  
|Paul Kim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 ACCERIS COMMUNICATIONS INC.OFFICERS CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350) April 12, 2004 The undersigned Allan C. Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of
Acceris Communications Inc., a Florida corporation (the Corporation), in
connection with the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby represent, warrant
and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Corporation. /s/ Allan C. SilberAllan SilberChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<LEGEND>               This schedule contains summary financial information
                       extracted from Scotsman Industries, Inc. Condensed 
                       Balance Sheet (Unaudited) as of Sept. 29, 1996 and
                       Scotsman Industries, Inc. Condensed Statement of Income
                       (Unaudited) for the Nine Months Ended Sept. 29, 1996 and
                       is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
                       financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER>                      1000
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<CASH>                            16,035
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                     71,632
<ALLOWANCES>                      3,290
<INVENTORY>                       50,791
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  147,514
<PP&E>                            46,891
<DEPRECIATION>                    42,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    294,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             74,671
<BONDS>                           77,537
<COMMON>                          945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       1,625
<OTHER-SE>                        125,945                    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      294,029
<SALES>                           282,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  282,720
<CGS>                             202,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     202,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                4,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   31,239
<INCOME-TAX>                      14,772
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               16,467
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                      16,467
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                     1.54

</TABLE>
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**753 CA 13-02221**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, CARNI, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

SHIRLEY WEST, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WILLIAM H. WEST, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

CAROUSEL FOOD SERVICE, INC., RUSSELL DIPASQUALE, INDIVIDUALLY AND DOING BUSINESS AS WATERING TROUGH, LITTLE FILLYS AND CAROUSEL ROOM AT THE FAIR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

DAVID W. POLAK ATTORNEY AT LAW, P.C., WEST SENECA (DAVID W. POLAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MARK R. UBA, WILLIAMSVILLE (MARK UBA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A. Michalek, J.), entered March 14, 2013. The order and judgment, among other things, granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4057-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the                               ( print page 18835)                            Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated March 6, 2012, and related determinations.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 20, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March 6, 2012.

Ballard County for Public Assistance.

Johnson, Kenton, Larue, Pendleton, Trimble, and Wolfe Counties for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2012-7396 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P