alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
392 A.2d 774

#### COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Lloyd C. PARKER, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted Sept. 12, 1977.

Decided Oct. 20, 1978.

*241C. George Milner, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Michael R. Stiles, Assistant District Attorney, and F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, District Attorney, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WATKINS, President Judge, and JACOBS, HOFFMAN, CERCONE, PRICE, VAN der VOORT and SPAETH, JJ.

CERCONE, Judge:

Appellant, Lloyd C. Parker, was tried before a jury and was found guilty of aggravated robbery on April 18, 1966. He was sentenced to five to ten years in prison. Parker appealed his conviction to the Superior Court. We affirmed the judgment of sentence, and Parker’s application for alio*242catur to the Supreme Court was denied. Appellant then pursued relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act, filing four different petitions, all of which were dismissed. It is from this last petition Parker appealed to our Court.

The voluntary defender for appellant did not file a brief in this case, but merely sent a letter to the prothonotary of our court stating that he felt all issues had been reviewed and adjudicated and that no new meritorious issues were presented. In order to prevent the state from paying a useless fee, counsel decided not to file a brief.

Although it is commendable that counsel in this case did not want to enlarge his fee, he failed to follow the requirements set forth by this court in *Commonwealth v. Greer,*455 Pa. 106, 314 A.2d 513 (1974). There we stated that in order to meet the requirements of *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and *Commonwealth v. Baker,*429 Pa. 209, 239 A.2d 201 (1968), counsel who examines the record of a case and decides an appeal would be wholly frivolous must:

> 1. request the court’s permission to withdraw,

> 2. file a brief referring the court to any part of the record which might support an appeal, and

> 3. send his or her client a copy of the brief in time to allow him to appeal in propria persona or request new counsel.

In the instant case, all counsel filed was a no merit letter which did not specifically request withdrawal nor is there evidence a copy was sent to appellant. Such no merit letters have been held to be insufficient to satisfy the *Anders*requirements. *Commonwealth v. Greer,*supra. For the above-mentioned reasons, counsel for appellant is directed either (1) to file a request for leave to withdraw that meets in all respects the requirements of notice to the appellant, *see Commonwealth v. Liska,*252 Pa.Super. 103, 109-110, 380 A.2d 1303, 1306 (1977), and to file a withdrawal brief that meets the description in *Commonwealth v. Greer,*455 Pa. 106, 108-09, 314 A.2d 513, 514-15 (1974), or (2) to proceed with the appeal by filing an advocate’s brief on the merits. *243In either case, counsel is to file a new brief and request, or new brief alone, within thirty (30) days, or risk sanctions.

It is so ordered.

WATKINS, former President Judge, and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 11790A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1005

Mr. John Monaco

President/ CEO, Chief sUAS Operator, and Founder

Sierra Pro Aerial Imaging, LLC

6610 Star Vista Lane

Rocklin, CA 95677

Dear Mr. Monaco :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated April 7, 2016 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Sierra Pro Aerial Imaging, LLC (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23 (a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You

requested an amendment to change the company name from Eagle View Aerial Imaging LLC

to Sierra Pro Aerial Imaging, LLC

. 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

preced ent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add operations . At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When

the FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 11790

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is

granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add th is amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Sierra Pro Aerial Imaging, LLC is hereafter referred to as the

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 11790 remain in

effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on June 30, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 366 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 366

   Expressing the Sense of the Senate on the certification of Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 4 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Kyl, Mr. 
  Domenici, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Hollings, and Mr. Sessions) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

            October 11 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the Sense of the Senate on the certification of Mexico.

Whereas Mexico will inaugurate a new government on 1 December 2000 that will be 
        the first change of authority from one party to another;
Whereas the 2nd July election of Vincente Fox Quesada of the Alliance for Change 
        marks an historic transition of power in open and fair elections;
Whereas Mexico and the United States share a 2,000-mile border, Mexico is the 
        United States' second largest trading partner, and the two countries 
        share historic and cultural ties;
Whereas drug production and trafficking are a threat to the national interests 
        and the well-being of the citizens of both countries; and
Whereas United States-Mexican cooperation on drugs is a cornerstone for policy 
        for both countries in developing effective programs to stop drug use, 
        drug production, and drug trafficking: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That (a) the Senate, on behalf of the people of the 
United States--
            (1) welcomes the constitutional transition of power in 
        Mexico;
            (2) congratulates the people of Mexico and their elected 
        representatives for this historic change; and
            (3) expresses its intent to continue to work cooperatively 
        with Mexican authorities to promote broad and effective efforts 
        for the health and welfare of United States and Mexican 
        citizens endangered by international drug trafficking, use, and 
        production.
    (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that the 
incoming new governments in both Mexico and the United States must 
develop and implement a counterdrug program that more effectively 
addresses the official corruption, the increase in drug traffic, and 
the lawlessness that has resulted from illegal drug trafficking, and 
that a one-year waiver of the requirement that the President certify 
Mexico is warranted to permit both new governments time to do so.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2365 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Polymer Acid Salt/Polymer Amide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Polymer Acid Salt/ 

Polymer Amide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYMER ACID SALT/POLYMER AMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polymer Acid Salt/Polymer 

Amide (provided for in subheading 3824.90.92) ............. 0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2365 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Euroopan unionin C 145/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 145 |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta30. huhtikuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 145

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta30. huhtikuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Neuvosto |
| 2020/C 145/01 | Neuvoston päätös, annettu 28 päivänä huhtikuuta 2020, jäsenten nimeämisestä tieteellis-tekniseen komiteaan | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Neuvosto

2020/C 145/01

Neuvoston päätös, annettu 28 päivänä huhtikuuta 2020, jäsenten nimeämisestä tieteellis-tekniseen komiteaan

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Neuvosto

| 30.4.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

C 145/1

---

NEUVOSTON PÄÄTÖS,

annettu 28 päivänä huhtikuuta 2020,

jäsenten nimeämisestä tieteellis-tekniseen komiteaan

(2020/C 145/01)

EUROOPAN UNIONIN NEUVOSTO, joka

ottaa huomioon Euroopan atomienergiayhteisön perustamissopimuksen ja erityisesti sen 134 artiklan 2 kohdan,

on kuullut Euroopan komissiota,

sekä katsoo seuraavaa:

| (1) | Neuvosto nimesi 6 marraskuuta 2018 antamallaan päätöksellä (1) tieteellis-teknisen komitean, jäljempänä ’komitea’, jäsenet 6 päivänä marraskuuta 2018 alkavaksi ja 6 päivänä marraskuuta 2023 päättyväksi kaudeksi. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Neuvosto nimesi 6 marraskuuta 2018 antamallaan päätöksellä (1) tieteellis-teknisen komitean, jäljempänä ’komitea’, jäsenet 6 päivänä marraskuuta 2018 alkavaksi ja 6 päivänä marraskuuta 2023 päättyväksi kaudeksi.

| (2) | Eugenijus UŠPURASin kuoleman johdosta komiteassa on vapautunut jäsenen paikka. Uusi jäsen olisi sen vuoksi nimettävä Eugenijus UŠPURASin jäljellä olevaksi toimikaudeksi. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Eugenijus UŠPURASin kuoleman johdosta komiteassa on vapautunut jäsenen paikka. Uusi jäsen olisi sen vuoksi nimettävä Eugenijus UŠPURASin jäljellä olevaksi toimikaudeksi.

| (3) | Grzegorz WROCHNAn eroamisen johdosta komiteassa on vapautunut jäsenen paikka. Uusi jäsen olisi sen vuoksi nimettävä Grzegorz WROCHNAn jäljellä olevaksi toimikaudeksi, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Grzegorz WROCHNAn eroamisen johdosta komiteassa on vapautunut jäsenen paikka. Uusi jäsen olisi sen vuoksi nimettävä Grzegorz WROCHNAn jäljellä olevaksi toimikaudeksi,

ON HYVÄKSYNYT TÄMÄN PÄÄTÖKSEN:

1 artikla

Nimetään Egidijus URBONAVIČIUS ja Józef SOBOLEWSKI tieteellis-teknisen komitean jäseniksi 6 päivään marraskuuta 2023 saakka.

2 artikla

Tämä päätös tulee voimaan päivänä, jona se hyväksytään.

Tehty Brysselissä 28 päivänä huhtikuuta 2020.

Neuvoston puolesta

Puheenjohtaja

G. GRLIĆ RADMAN

---

(1)  Neuvoston päätös, annettu 6 päivänä marraskuuta 2018, jäsenten nimeämisestä tieteellis-tekniseen komiteaan (EUVL C 403, 9.11.2018, s. 2).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: August 15, 2011
/s/ Jing XieJing Xie

Chief Financial Officer
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 380

Approving the placement of 2 paintings in the Senate reception room.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19 (legislative date, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Approving the placement of 2 paintings in the Senate

reception room.

Whereas Senate Resolution 241, 106th Congress, directed the

Senate Commission on Art to select 2 outstanding individuals whose paintings shall be placed in 2 of the remaining unfilled spaces in the Senate reception room,

upon approval by the Senate; and

Whereas, in accordance with the provisions of Senate Resolution 241, the Commission has selected Senator Arthur H.

Vandenberg and Senator Robert F. Wagner, and recommends such names to the Senate: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved, That the Senate Commission on Art (re2 ferred to in this resolution as the ‘‘Commission’’) shall

3 procure appropriate paintings of Senator Arthur H. Van-
2

•SRES 380 ATS

1 denberg and Senator Robert F. Wagner and place such

2 paintings in the 2 unfilled spaces on the south wall of the

3 Senate reception room.

4 SEC. 2. (a) The paintings shall be rendered in oil on

5 canvas and shall be consistent in style and manner with

6 the paintings of Senators Clay, Calhoun, Webster,

7 LaFollette, and Taft now displayed in the Senate recep8 tion room.

9 (b) The paintings may be procured through purchase,

10 acceptance as a gift of appropriate existing paintings, or

11 through the execution of appropriate paintings by a quali12 fied artist or artists to be selected and contracted by the

13 Commission.

14 SEC. 3. The expenses of the Commission in carrying

15 out this resolution shall be paid out of the contingent fund

16 of the Senate on vouchers signed by the Secretary of the

17 Senate and approved by the Committee on Rules and Ad18 ministration.

Æ
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 91

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2000

Referred to the Committee on International Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from

the rule of the former Soviet Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on March 11, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Lithuania led to the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;

Whereas Lithuania since then has successfully built democracy, ensured human and minority rights, the rule of law,

developed a free market economy, implemented exemplary

relations with neighboring countries, and consistently

pursued a course of integration into the community of

free and democratic nations by seeking membership in

the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
2

SCON 91 RFH

Whereas Lithuania, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress hereby—

3 (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occasion of

4 the tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its

5 independence and the leading role it played in the

6 disintegration of the former Soviet Union; and

7 (2) commends Lithuania for its success in im8 plementing political and economic reforms, which

9 may further speed the process of that country’s inte10 gration into European and Western institutions.

Passed the Senate March 2, 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Allion Healthcare, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2006, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(i) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Allion
Healthcare, Inc.

Dated: November 17, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael P. Moran   
|Michael P. Moran       
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/ James G. Spencer   
|James G. Spencer       
|Chief Financial Officer
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40376

_____________________

TEXANS AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC., ET AL.,

Plaintiffs,

WYNNE L. CREEKMORE, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE BAR OF TEXAS; JAMES M. MCCORMACK;

DISTRICT 1A GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE OF THE

STATE BAR OF TEXAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(3:94-CV-61)

_________________________________________________________________

(October 9, 1996)

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this case, the appellant, Wynne L. Creekmore, Jr., argues

on vague grounds that the State Bar of Texas violated his rights

guaranteed by the First Amendment by issuing guidelines for

regulating written solicitations by lawyers. We find none of his
arguments convincing. We find that the extensive district court

opinion ably and correctly addressed each of the issues raised by

the appellant. See Texans Against Censorship, Inc. v. State Bar of

Texas, 888 F.Supp 1328 (E.D.Tex. 1995). Therefore, we AFFIRM on

the basis of the district court’s opinion.

A F F I R M E D.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 2

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum of the Senate

is assembled.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Informing the President of the United States that a quorum

of the Senate is assembled.

1 Resolved, That a committee consisting of two Sen2 ators be appointed to join such committee as may be ap3 pointed by the House of Representatives to wait upon the

4 President of the United States and inform him that a

5 quorum of each House is assembled and that the Congress

6 is ready to receive any communication he may be pleased

7 to make.

Æ
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)-14(b) or
      15(d)-14(b), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      May
      12, 2008




By:
            /s/ Rick
              M.
              StreetRick M.
              Street
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Neurogen Corporation  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

- I am the Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer of Neurogen    Corporation (the "Company").    
- To the best of my knowledge:

> - The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,      2003 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities      and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and    
- The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    

By: /s/ Stephen R. Davis

--------------------------  Stephen R. Davis  Executive Vice President and  Chief Business Officer  Date: March 15, 2004