T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T C H A R L E S D A V I D W I L L I A M S , J r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v . PO RTERV I LLE PO LI CE D E P A R T M E N T and D O M IN IC B AR T E AU , D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, N o. 10- 15748 D . C . N o. 1: 08 -c v-00 54 6-A W IDLB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthony W . I s hi i , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an d F IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C ha r l e s D a vi d W i l l i a m s , J r . , aC a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc our t ’ s s um m a ry j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng u n la w f u l e n try a n d f

a ls e a rr e s t. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e 

# FI LED JU L 6 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 15748 2 r e v ie w d e n o v o . Mo r r is o n v . H a ll , 2 6 1 F. 3 d 8 9 6 , 9 0 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 1 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y gra nt ed sum m ary j ud gm entfor O ff i ce r B art eau because W i l l i am s di d n otra i se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i al fa ctas t o w hether O f f ic e rB a r te au h a d c o n s e n t to e n te rh is r e s id e n c e . See Espi no sa v. C i t y andCnt

y. of Sa n Francisc o , 598 F . 3d 528, 533 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( c ons e nti s a n e xc e pt i on t o the F o u r th A m e n d m e n t’s w a rr a n t r e q u ir e m e n t) ; U n ite d S ta te s v . E n s lin , 327 F . 3d 788, 793- 94 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( i n or de rt o gi ve va l i d c ons e nt , athi r d pa r ty m us tha ve e ith e ra c tu a l o rap p a r e n t au th o r ity ) ; s e e a ls o U n ite d S ta te s v . R u iz , 428 F . 3d 877, 881 ( 9th C i r . 2005) ( s e tt i ng f or th the r e qui r e m e nt s f

ore s t abl i s hi ng appa r e nt autho ri ty) . N or di d W i l l i am s r ai se a genui ne di sput e of m at er i al fa ctas t o w hether O f f ic e rB a r te au h a d p r o b ab le c au s e to a rr e s t h im . See U ni ted Stat es v. L op ez , 482 F . 3d 10 67 , 10 72 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( “ P robabl e c ause t o arr es texi st s w hen o ff i ce rs ha ve know l e dge orr e a s onabl y trus tw or thy i nf orm a t i on s uf

f i c i e ntt o l e a d ape r s on of r e a s onabl e c aut i on t o be l i e ve tha ta n of f e ns e ha s be e n ori s be i ng c om m i tt e d by the pers on bei ng arre st ed. ”) . T he di s tr i c tc our tpr ope r l y gr a nt e d s um m a ry j udgm e ntf orthe C i ty of P or t e rvi l l e P ol i c e D e pa r tm e ntbe c aus e W i l l i a m s di d notr a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rac o n s titu tio n a l v io la tio n h a d o c c u rr e d . See J acks on v. C i t y of B r e m e r ton , 2 6 8 F .3 d 6 4 6 , 6 5 3 - 5 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( “N e ith e ram u n ic ip a lity10- 15748 3 noras upe rvi s or. . . c a n be he l d l i abl e unde r§ 1983 w he r e no i nj ury or const i tut i on al vi ol at i on has occ urre d. ”) . W i l l i a m s ’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons , i nc l udi ng thos e c onc e rni ng the a d m is s ib ility a n d c r e d ib ility o f th e M e lis s aW illia m s d e c la r a tio n , a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.