alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purpose of Section 11 of the
         Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
         1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of such sections, nor shall
         it be deemed a part of any other filing which  incorporates this report
         by  reference,  unless such other filing  expressly  incorporates  this
         Exhibit by reference
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                      DEC-26-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                               1
<CASH>                                    2,613
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                             1,248
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                               1,275
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         16,238
<PP&E>                                   42,682
<DEPRECIATION>                          (10,520)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           70,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    17,581
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      9
<OTHER-SE>                               16,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             70,848
<SALES>                                 122,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        122,563
<CGS>                                    35,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            35,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         80,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        3,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (22,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (22,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            (22,166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (2.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (2.73)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2022286EN.01002701.xml

| 27.7.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/27

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions at its meeting on 21 January 2022 concerning a draft decision in case AT.39839 – Telefónica and Portugal Telecom

Rapporteur: Belgium

(2022/C 286/08)

1.

The Advisory Committee (14 Member States) agrees with the Commission to re-impose fines on Telefónica, S.A. and Pharol, SGPS, S.A. by means of a decision pursuant to Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

2.

The Advisory Committee (14 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the identity of the services excluded from the value of sales on the basis that insurmountable barriers to entry existed and the parties were thus not in potential competition with each other during the period of application of the non-compete clause.

3.

The Advisory Committee (14 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s use of the revised corrected figures for Telefonica for the purposes of identifying the value of sales.

4.

The Advisory Committee (14 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines imposed on Telefónica, S.A. and Pharol, SGPS, S.A., including the reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003.

5.

The Advisory Committee (14 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 254

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Olympics.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 8, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals and ideals of the Olympics.

Whereas for over 100 years, the Olympic movement has built

a more peaceful and better world by educating young

people through amateur athletics, by bringing together

athletes from many countries in friendly competition, and

by forging new relationships bound by friendship, solidarity, and fair play;

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee is dedicated

to coordinating and developing amateur athletic activity

in the United States to foster productive working relationships among sports-related organizations;

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee promotes and

supports amateur athletic activities involving the United

States and foreign nations;
2

•SRES 254 IS

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee promotes and

encourages physical fitness and public participation in

amateur athletic activities;

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee assists organizations and persons concerned with sports in the development of athletic programs for amateur athletes;

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee protects the

opportunity of each amateur athlete, coach, trainer, manager, administrator, and official to participate in amateur

athletic competition;

Whereas athletes representing the United States at the Olympic Games have achieved great success personally and for

the Nation;

Whereas thousands of men and women of the United States

are focusing their energy and skill on becoming part of

the United States Olympic Team, and aspire to compete

in the 2000 Summer Olympic Games in Sydney, Australia, and the 2002 Olympic Winter Games in Salt Lake

City, Utah;

Whereas the Nation takes great pride in the qualities of commitment to excellence, grace under pressure, and good

will toward other competitors exhibited by the athletes of

the United States Olympic Team; and

Whereas June 23 is the anniversary of the founding of the

modern Olympic movement, representing the date on

which the Congress of Paris approved the proposal of

Pierre de Coubertin to found the modern Olympics: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—
3

•SRES 254 IS

1 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Olym2 pics;

3 (2) calls upon the President to issue a procla4 mation recognizing the anniversary of the founding

5 of the modern Olympic movement; and

6 (3) calls upon the people of the United States

7 to observe such anniversary with appropriate cere8 monies and activities.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2021

No. 04-21-00185-CR

Adelida TREVINO,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-203-CR

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 The reporter’s record in these companion cases was originally due June 28, 2021. In 

response to this court’s notification that the record was late, the court reporter requested an 

extension of time to file the record until August 23, 2021, and we granted that request. On 

August 26, 2021, the court reporter requested an additional extension of time until September 7, 

2021, for a total extension of 70 days. We granted that request and ordered the court reporter to 

file the record by September 7, 2021. 

 As of the date of this order, the reporter’s record has not been filed. We therefore 

ORDER the court reporter to file the record by September 20, 2021. If the record is not filed 

within the time provided, we may initiate contempt proceedings.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of September, 2021.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2004 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item
601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and
(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

|Date: August 16, 2004 | /s/JOHN FITZPATRICKName: John Fitzpatrick
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe VARGAS, a/k/a Monkey, a/k/a Chongo, a/k/a Cricket, a/k/a Grillo, a/k/a Manuel Gonzales Garcia, Defendant, and John P. Gascoyne and David Bye, Appellants.

No. 82CA1059.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Aug. 4, 1983.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 1, 1983.

*1089Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel W. Can-trick, Dolores S. Atencio, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bye, Gascoyne & Aylward, John P. Gas-coyne, David Bye, Fort Collins, for appellants.

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

Attorneys for defendant appeal an order of the trial court denying the attorneys’ request for increased attorney fees incurred in connection with their representation of defendant. We dismiss the appeal.

Defendant Vargas was charged by information with first degree murder on April 24, 1981. On May 5, 1981, attorneys Bye and Gascoyne were appointed as co-counsel by the trial court to represent him. On February 1, 1982, and before the matter had proceeded to trial, the information against defendant was dismissed on motion of the district attorney because of newly discovered evidence. Bye and Gascoyne then filed their motions for payment of attorney fees. On April 19, 1982, the trial court awarded Bye $3,000, and Gascoyne $1,000 for their services. Claiming that the court award of attorney fees was significantly less than the actual amount due to then) because of the time put into the case, the attorneys filed a motion on May 4, 1982, to reconsider or modify the court's order for attorney fees. The trial court denied the motion and this appeal followed.

At the outset, we agree with the People’s contention that this court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

Neither the defendant nor the prosecutor have any further interest or concern with this dismissed case, and the attorneys assert no claim which would affect either the defendant or the prosecutor. Because the attorneys seek an order against the trial court for an allowance of additional fees, their dispute is with the trial court.

We, therefore, lack jurisdiction, and the appeal is dismissed.

SMITH and STERNBERG, JJ., concur.
DIMISS and Opinion Filed March 14, 2022 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00147-CV SLD, LLP, Appellant V. DALLAS COUNTY, PARKLAND HOSPITAL DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOL EQUALIZATION FUND, DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DI STRICT, AND CITY OF DALLAS, Appellees
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-19-01904

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Reichek, and Goldstein Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness Before the Court is the parties’ notice of settlement and agreed motion to
dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). We grant the motion and
dismiss the appeal. See id.

210147F.P05 /Robbie Partida-Kipness / ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

SLD, LLP, Appellant

No. 05-21-00147-CV V.

DALLAS COUNTY , PARKLAND HOSPITAL DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOL EQUALIZATION FUND, DALLAS INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, AND CITY OF DALLAS, Appellees On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. TX-19-01904.Opinion delivered by Justice PartidaKipness, Justices Reichek and Goldstein participating.

In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
As agreed by the parties, we ORDER that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered March 14, 2022.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Allyn P. Hebner, Chief Financial Officer of Motricity, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 4, 2011



/s/ Allyn P. HebnerAllyn P. HebnerChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### C & G SEALING AND PAVING CONSTRUCTION and Cincinnati Insurance Company, Appellants, v. Bruce HARMON, Appellee.

No. BH-430.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 15, 1986.

Delia Doyle Rose of Haas, Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer, Dayto-na Beach, for appellants.

Edward H. Hurt of Hurt, Parrish, and Dalton, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe and Cooley, Orlando, for appellee.

*87PER CURIAM.

Appellants having failed to present this court with a record which indicates that the issues argued were preserved for appellate review, we have no alternative but to affirm the deputy commissioner.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23
TO FORM 10-K OF
SEA PINES ASSOCIATES, INC.

Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8, filed on June 18, 2001, pertaining to the Director Stock
Compensation Plan and the Deferred Issuance Stock Plan of Sea Pines Associates,
Inc. of our report dated December 8, 2003, except for the subsequent events
paragraph in Note 7, as to which the date is December 17, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sea Pines Associates, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 2003.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
January 23, 2004
#### STATE ex rel. Marvin Glenn DEAL v. Robert H. BUTLER, Warden.

No. 88-KH-2396.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Deal, Marvin Glenn; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 117853.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10 KSB FOR THE
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          47,531
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                    38,611
<INVENTORY>                                     21,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,325
<PP&E>                                         217,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                 159,696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 537,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          983,544
<BONDS>                                        376,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        397
<COMMON>                                        18,278
<OTHER-SE>                                   (851,105)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   537,745
<SALES>                                        781,137
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               781,137
<CGS>                                           68,940
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,595
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,439,602
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (868,015)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (520,809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              5,144,149
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,623,340
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended November 26, 2011 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                                                      |
|   |   |                                                                                     |
|   |   | Scott J. Miller*Chief Financial Officer*

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Date: January10, 2012
From: Charles Ball [mailto:CBall@emissionsandsilencers.com]  
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:28 PM 
To: nelson.brad@ecrweb.com 
Subject: General Silencer/Converter info

Brad, here is some general info on EST oxidation silencer/converters.  

 
                      "Affordable and efficient emission reduction solutions"
                                       www.emissionsandsilencers.com  

Charles Ball
Engineering Manager
cball@emissionsandsilencers.com   
20322 Hufsmith-Kohrville Rd. 
Tomball, TX 77375   
Office:  832-559-6505
Cell:  313-920-5099
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 239 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 239

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh, who was abducted 
  from the United States, should be returned home to her mother, Ms. 
                            Maureen Dabbagh.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 1999

Mr. Robb submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh, who was abducted 
  from the United States, should be returned home to her mother, Ms. 
                            Maureen Dabbagh.

Whereas Mr. Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh and Mrs. Maureen Dabbagh had a daughter, 
        Nadia Dabbagh, in 1990;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh and Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh were divorced in February 
        1992;
Whereas in 1993, Nadia was abducted by her father;
Whereas Mohamad Hisham fled the United States with Nadia;
Whereas the Governments of Syria and the United States have granted child 
        custody to Maureen Dabbagh and both have issued arrest warrants for 
        Mohamad Dabbagh;
Whereas Mohamad Dabbagh originally escaped to Saudi Arabia;
Whereas the Department of State believed that Nadia was residing in Syria until 
        late 1998;
Whereas the Senate passed S. Res. 293 for Nadia Dabbagh on October 21, 1998, 
        asking Syria to aid in the return of Nadia to her mother in the United 
        States;
Whereas in 1999, Syria invited Maureen Dabbagh to Syria to meet with her 
        daughter;
Whereas the Department of State believes that in 1999 Nadia was moved to Saudi 
        Arabia and is residing with Mohamad Dabbagh;
Whereas although Nadia is in Saudi Arabia, neither she nor Mohamad Dabbagh are 
        Saudi Arabian citizens;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh, with the assistance of missing children organizations, 
        has been unable to reunite with her daughter;
Whereas the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and 
        Interpol have been unsuccessful in their attempts to bring Nadia back to 
        the United States;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh has not seen her daughter in more than six years; and
Whereas it will take the continued effort and pressure on the part of the Saudi 
        Arabian officials to bring this case to a successful conclusion: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Governments 
of the United States and Saudi Arabia immediately locate Nadia and 
deliver her safely to her mother.
                                 <all>
```