alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary information extracted from the consolidated
balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is qualified in 
its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         468,189
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,286,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,819,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,684,949
<PP&E>                                         974,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                 604,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,439,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,125,437
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    376,593
<COMMON>                                       10,204,614
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,343,241)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,439,119
<SALES>                                        2,356,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,356,894
<CGS>                                          1,798,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  641,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             75,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            9,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   9,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE

UNITED STATESDISTRICTCOURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF**COLUMBI~oU/ILEO** WITHTN 

### cSQ' Ts E ) O '\'{';'" /**~:** f SHARQAWI ADDU ALIAL-HAJJ ) (ISN 1457), ) ) Petitioner, ) ) Civil No. 09-745 (RCL) 

### v. ) ) BARACKOBAMA, 

### etaL, ) ) Respondents. ) ) ,ORDER Upon consideration of petitioner's Motion [1472J to Strike Statements in the Factual Return, respondents' opposition, the reply thereto, and the applicable law, it is for the reasons stated inthe accompanying Memorandum Opinion hereby ORDERED that petitioner's motion is DENIED IN PART with respect to any statements petitionermade while in custody in Pakistan; andit is furthennore ORDERED that petitioner's motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to any statements petitioner made while in custody at Bagram Air Force Base; and it is furthennore ORDERED that petitioner's motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to any statements petitionermade while in custody at Guantanamo Bay; and it is furthennore ORDERED 

### that respondents shall file an amended factual return within 30 days ofthis Order; and it is furthennore



### 8BfJMrt'HN8P8ftff UNCLASSIFIEOIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASEUNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE



### ORDERED that respondents shall file an unclassified factual return within 14 days ofthe date on which respondents are to file an amended factual return; and it 

### is furthermore ORDERED that respondents shall file notice under Section 

### Ln.1 of Judge Hogan's Case Management Order (Misc. No. 08-442) within 14 days of the date on which respondents are to file an amended factual return; and it is furthermore ORDERED thatpetitioner shall file a traverse within 14 days ofthe date onwhich respondents file notice under Section I.D.I. SOORDERED.

# ~c,~ DATE 

### RO CEC. LAMBERTH CHIEFJUDGE

UNCLASSIFIEDIIFOR PUBLIC RELEASE 

### 2
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Howard JOHNSON.

No. 87-KK-0407.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 24, 1987.

In re Johnson, Howard; applying for supervisory writs; Parish of St. James, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 880-A, 880-B; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-K-102.

Granted. The state’s failure to commence trial within the time period provided by law requires that the defendant be released without bail. So ordered.

MARCUS and COLE, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Matthew A. JonesName: Matthew A. JonesTitle: Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: May 17, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7719]

# AGENCY:

Department of State.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal of the Advisory Committee charter.

*Renewal of Advisory Committee:*                     The Secretary of State announces the renewal of the charter of the Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services in fulfillment of the provisions of the 2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.                

*Purpose:*                     The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to serve the Department of State in an advisory capacity with respect to the formulation, coordination, and oversight of foreign policy related to international postal services and other international delivery services. The Committee provides a forum for government employees, representatives of the industry sector and members of the public to present their advice and views directly to the Department of State.                

For further information, please contact Dennis Delehanty, Office of Global Systems (IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-4197.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Dennis M. Delehanty,

Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-741 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Michael D. MILLER and Joan H. Miller, his wife, Appellants, v. R. Peter DEWITT, Jr., Appellee.

No. 86-2219.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 8, 1987.

Kenneth R. Lester, Jr., of Greenberg & Lester, Fern Park, for appellants.

Bernard D. Sommers, Maitland, for ap-pellee.

SHARP, Judge.

We affirm the partial summary judgment appealed in this cause, but pursuant to stipulation of counsel made to this court, we clarify the provisions of paragraph one to provide that the referenced mortgage and note recorded in Official Records Book 3800, page 659, Public Records, Orange County, Florida, are assigned to plaintiff, R. Peter Dewitt, Jr., as collateral for the *770$159,935.53 judgment, plus interest, obtained against the defendants.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.
Order filed, September 30, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00514-CV

____________

ELIZABETH LAGUNA, Appellant

V.

HOUSTON HOUSING AUTHORITY, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1031234

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 09, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Laura Cutherell, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
T.C. Summary Opinion 2010-175

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

AFI ABDI, Petitioner v . COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 18526-09S. Filed December 22, 2010.

Afi Abdi, pro se. Derek W. Kaczmarek , for respondent.

GERBER, Judge : This case was heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7463 1 of the Internal Revenue Code in effect when the petition was filed. Pursuant to section 7463(b), the decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court,

1 Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the year at issue, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.- 2 -

and this opinion shall not be treated as precedent for any other

case. Respondent determined a $4,132 deficiency in petitioner’s 2008 Federal income tax and a $826.40 penalty under section 6662(a) and (b)(1). At trial respondent conceded the penalty, leaving the following issues for the Court’s consideration: (1) Whether petitioner is entitled to head of household filing status; and (2) whether petitioner is entitled to the earned income tax credit. Background Petitioner resided in Arizona when his petition was filed. Petitioner, his wife, and their five children resided in the same dwelling for the entire 2008 taxable year. Petitioner and his wife were married before 2008 and were married throughout the 2008 tax year. On his 2008 Federal income tax return, petitioner reported his filing status as “head of household” and claimed two dependent children. He also sought an earned income tax credit of $4,132. Respondent determined that petitioner’s filing status was “married filing separately” and that he was not entitled to an earned income tax credit. Discussion Generally the Commissioner’s notice of deficiency determinations are presumed correct, and taxpayers bear the- 3 -

burden of proving otherwise. Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering , 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933). There is no question in this case concerning the burden of proof. In the circumstances of this case, the fact that petitioner was married and resided with his wife throughout the entire 2008 taxable year causes him to be disqualified from claiming head of household filing status under section 2(b). Although there are some exceptions to that general rule, petitioner has not shown that any exception applies. Petitioner also claimed an earned income tax credit. Under section 32, that credit is available to individuals who meet certain requirements. Under section 32(d), a married individual is eligible for the credit only if he files a joint return for the taxable year. Petitioner did not file a joint return for the 2008 taxable year, and, accordingly, he is not entitled to an earned income tax credit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent as to the income tax deficiency and forpetitioner as to the accuracyrelated penalty
.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Plum Creek Timber Company, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Lambert, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 27, 2009By:

/S/  DAVID W. LAMBERTDAVID W. LAMBERT Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rotoblock
Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Scholl, Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date:  March 15, 2006        /s/ Matthias Heinze
                              -----------------------------------------
                              By: Matthias Heinze, Chief Executive Officer













<PAGE>
JAMES ROBERT FRANKENBERRY, JR.

,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON
OFFENDER REVIEW

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 5638

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 25, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge

.

James Robert Frankenberry, Jr., pro se

, Appellant.

No appearance for Ap pellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED

.

LEWIS, C. J., BENTON and ROWE

, J J

. , CONCUR.
391 A.2d 693

#### Commonwealth v. Carlus Moore, Appellant.

*620Submitted March 20,1978.

Brian R. Williams, for appellant; Eric B. Henson, Assistant District Attorney, and Edward G. Rendell, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Steven Tanner, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 08,2007
| /s/ Steven Tanner        |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| Steven Tanner            |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
| Chief Financial  Officer |   |   |

 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We hereby consent to the incorporation
    by reference in the Registration Statement on: Form S-8 Nos. (333-86761,
     333-88881, 333-08483, 333-08477, 333-81646) of Acceris Communications Inc. of our report dated
    April 14, 2004, except for Note 3 as to which date is
September 28, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
    which appears in this Form
10-K/A #1. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Diego, California
October 22, 2004
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  May 15, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Thomas N. ChieffeThomas N. ChieffePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)