alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2






Certification of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to






Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer,





hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:






(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.









Date: March 14, 2011





ROTOBLOCK CORPORATION




/s/ Richard Di Stefano





By: Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 298

   Designating the month of May each year as the Month for Children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 27, 2000

     Mr. Robb (for himself and Mr. Warner) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the month of May each year as the Month for Children.

Whereas too often, our children suffer from hunger and homelessness;
Whereas the increase in crime in our schools hinders the educational development 
        of our children;
Whereas all children should have food, shelter, and health care, and should be 
        afforded educational opportunity;
Whereas all children should be protected from abuse and neglect; and
Whereas the period of childhood for too many children is marked by hardship and 
        despair: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates the month of May each year as the Month for 
        Children;
            (2) encourages all Americans to commit themselves to 
        improving the lives and future of all children by serving as 
        positive role models for the children of the United States and 
        the world; and
            (3) urges community leaders to publicly acknowledge the 
        significant contributions children make to society.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION; CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY MARKETING, L.L.C.;

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; AND ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, L.L.C.

PETITION OF: ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; AND ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, L.L.C. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 225 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION; CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY MARKETING, L.L.C.;

ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; AND ANADARKO E&P ONSHORE, L.L.C.

PETITION OF: CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION; CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, L.L.C.; CHESAPEAKE ENERGY MARKETING, L.L.C. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 226 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court[ 225 MAL 2019 and 226 MAL 2019 ]

- 2 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30 th day of October, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, rephrased for clarity, are:

(1) Are claims by the Commonwealth, brought on behalf of private landowners against natural gas extractors alleging that the extractors used deceptive, misleading, and unfair tactics in securing natural gas leases from landowners, cognizable under the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer

Protection Law?

(2) May the Commonwealth pursue antitrust remedies under the Unfair Trade

Practices and Consumer Protection Law?

Petitioners’ Applications to Supplement Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED as

moot.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Andre' Di Mino, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, to the best of his knowledge that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods shown in such report.

Date: June 24, 2004                     By: /s/ Andre' Di Mino
                                                Andre' Di Mino
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                 And Chief Financial
                                                  Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the *"Report"*), I, Brenton W. Hatch , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | August 11, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ Brenton W. Hatch    |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |            |   |   | Brenton W. Hatch        |   |
|   |            |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |                 |        |        |                         |        |  |
#### Anna Katz, Plaintiff, *v.*Max Katz, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

February 24, 1959.

*Finkelstein •& Robinson (Samuel Finkelstein*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Max Katz,*defendant in person.

*654Henry J. Latham, J.

The plaintiff seeks judgment declaring the nullity of a decree of divorce that the defendant procured against her in the First Civil Court, Bravos District, City of Juarez, State of Chihuahua, Republic of Mexico, and that she still is his lawful wife.

The parties were married in this State on October 5, 1937. There are two sons of this marriage, respectively 14 and 16 years of age.

In an action for a separation instituted by the plaintiff in this court in January, 1956, a judgment of separation, after trial, was entered in her favor on or about June 26, 1957.

In December, 1957, the defendant commenced an action for divorce against the plaintiff in Mexico. The plaintiff herein did not appear in that action. On January 3, 1958, however, a decree of divorce was entered against her by default.

The defendant, who is an attorney, conceded in his testimony that he went to Mexico specifically for the purpose of obtaining a divorce. He stayed there five weeks and returned to his former home in The Bronx, where he still resides. He went through a marriage ceremony with another woman in Prince Edward County, Virginia, on January 11, 1948, and since then has been living with her as husband and wife in Bronx County, City of New York.

It is well settled that in the absence of an appearance by a defendant sued for divorce in the courts of the Republic of Mexico, the resulting decree will not be recognized as valid if the plaintiff in the divorce action, though physically present in Mexico, was not in fact a bona fide domiciliary of Mexico at the time that the divorce decree was rendered. *(Imbrioscia*v. *Quayle,*278 App. Div. 144, affd. 303 N. Y. 841.)

This court finds that the defendant herein did not, in fact, establish a bona fide domicile in Mexico sufficient to give the Mexican court jurisdiction to grant a decree of divorce. Consequently, the purported Mexican divorce decree did not dissolve defendant’s marriage with this plaintiff, who continued to be and still is his lawful wife.

Plaintiff’s application for a counsel fee, pursuant to section 1169-a of the Civil Practice Act, is granted in view of the reservation contained in the order of Honorable James C. Van Stolen dated May 19,1958. She is allowed the sum of $150.

Settle judgment on two days’ notice.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                        760,307
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 10,718
<ALLOWANCES>                  8,500
<INVENTORY>                   12,855
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              1,535,602
<PP&E>                        378,850
<DEPRECIATION>                276,723
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,673,101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         448,520
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      667
<OTHER-SE>                    (1,014,296)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,673,101
<SALES>                       55,918
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              55,918
<CGS>                         316,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              5,016,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            1,991,741
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (7,243,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                  800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (7,244,707)
<EPS-BASIC>                 (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.37)

<FN>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the balance
sheets and statement of operations  found on pages __ through __of the Company's
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2014

No. 04-14-00713-CR

Ex Parte Anthony Ray PERRYMAN,

Appellant

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR10581

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

\

Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 15, 2014, indicating a desire to file an 

appeal from a September 8, 2014, order of the trial court denying a “petition for writ of habeas 

corpus for recusal.” The clerk’s record does not contain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus or 

a ruling on the merits of a petition. Nor does the record contain a judgment against Perryman or 

other appealable order of the trial court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2.

We therefore order a response due November 3, 2014, showing why this appeal should 

not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. If appellant fails to satisfactorily respond within the 

time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). If a supplemental 

clerk’s record is necessary to show this court’s jurisdiction, appellant must file a written request 

with the clerk, specifying the pleadings and orders to be included. Appellant must file a copy of 

any such request with this court.

All deadlines in this matter are suspended until further order of the court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6723]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; NIGMS Trauma and Burn Research 
Centers.
    Date: April 13, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency--Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3An18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#087861636a7a486569616426666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a4bdbfb6a694b9b5bdb8fababdbcfab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6723 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
.ECE1VEDSEP212000STATEOFDELAWAREbRE(jI0NIIIOFFICEOFREGIONALADMINISTRATOkDEPARTMENTOFNATURALRESOURCESANDENVIRONMENTALCONTROLOFFICEOFTHE89KINGSHIGHWAYPHoNE:(302)739-9000SECRETARYDOVER,DELAWARE19901FAX:(302)739-6242September16,2009Mr.WilliamC.Early(3RAOO)ActingRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegionIll1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Early:IampleasedtosubmittheenclosedStateImplementationPlanforMeetingtheInfrastructureRequirementsoftheCleanAirActforFineParticulateMatter.ThepurposeofthisSIPrevisionistodetailhowDelawaremeetsallofthenecessaryimplementation,maintenance,andenforcementmeasuresrequiredbyCleanAirAct(“CAA”)Section110(a)andSection110(a)(2)forthe200624-hourfineparticulate(PM2.5)NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS).TheeffectivedateofthisSIPrevisionisSeptember1,2009.InthisSIPrevisionDelawareaddressesthoserequirementsofSection110(a)andSection110(a)(2)oftheCAAwhichhavenotbeenspecificallyaddressedinotherSIPrevisions.ItisacompilationofcertainelementsthatdescribehowDelawaredemonstratesthatthe24-hourNAAQSisbeingimplemented,maintainedandenforced.TheelementsofthisSIPrevision,onceapprovedbyEPA,willprovideafederallyenforceablewrittenconfirmationofhowDelawarewillcontinuetocomplywiththeSection1l0(a)(2)requirementsoftheCAA.ManyofthemiscellaneousrequirementsofSection110(a)(2)(A)-(M)oftheCAArelevanttothe2006PM2.5NAAQSarealreadycontainedinDelaware’sSIPorinSIPrevisionswhichhavebeensubmittedto,butnotyetapprovedbyEPA.ThisSIPrevisionmetpublichearingprocessrequirementsestablishedbytheStateofDelaware,andasrequiredbyEPA,withpropernotification(30days)priortotheconveningofthepublichearing.ThehearingwasheldonAugust27,2009.AttachmentsAandBarecopiesofaffidavitsasproofofpropernotification.ItisthepositionoftheStateofDelawarethatallminimumrequirementssetforthinthe1990CleanAirActAmendmentshavebeenmet.De€ataze9&id‘uazedeftetd4oodCMr.WilliamEarlySeptember16,2009Page2WelookforwardtocontinuingthecooperativeeffortbetweenDelawareandEPAinthisimportantwork.Asalways,feelfreetocontactmeorAliMirzakhalili,ProgramAdministrator,(302)739-9402,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcerningtheencloseddocuments.Sincere1v-,ColhnP.0MaraSecretarycc:DianeEsher,EPAw/encl.DaveArnold,EPAw/encl.AliMirzakhalili
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 258

Designating the week beginning March 12, 2000, as ‘‘National Safe Place

Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. CRAIG (for himself, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. CLELAND, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

GRAMS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KERRY, Ms.

LANDRIEU, Mr. LOTT, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SMITH of

Oregon, and Mr. SPECTER) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating the week beginning March 12, 2000, as

‘‘National Safe Place Week’’.

Whereas today’s youth are vital to the preservation of our

country and will be the future bearers of the bright torch

of democracy;

Whereas youth need a safe haven from various negative influences such as child abuse, substance abuse and crime,

and they need to have resources readily available to assist

them when faced with circumstances that compromise

their safety;
2

SRES 258 IS

Whereas the United States needs increased members of community volunteers acting as positive influences on the

Nation’s youth;

Whereas the Safe Place program is committed to protecting

our Nation’s most valuable asset, our youth, by offering

short term ‘‘safe places’’ at neighborhood locations where

trained volunteers are available to counsel and advise

youth seeking assistance and guidance;

Whereas Safe Place combines the efforts of the private sector

and non-profit organizations uniting to reach youth in

the early stages of crisis;

Whereas Safe Place provides a direct means to assist programs in meeting performance standards relative to outreach/community relations, as set forth in the Federal

Runaway and Homeless Youth Act guidelines;

Whereas the Safe Place placard displayed at businesses within communities stands as a beacon of safety and refuge

to at-risk youth;

Whereas over 300 communities in 33 States and more than

6,800 business locations have established Safe Place programs;

Whereas over 35,000 young people have gone to Safe Place

locations to get help when faced with crisis situations;

Whereas through the efforts of Safe Place coordinators

across the country each year more than one-half million

students learn that Safe Place is a resource if abusive or

neglectful situations exist; and

Whereas increased awareness of the program’s existence will

encourage communities to establish Safe Places for the

Nation’s youth throughout the country: Now, therefore,

be it
3

SRES 258 IS

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) proclaims the week of March 12 through

3 March 18, 2000, as ‘‘National Safe Place Week’’;

4 and

5 (2) requests that the President issue a procla6 mation calling upon the people of the United States

7 and interested groups to promote awareness of and

8 volunteer involvement in the Safe Place programs,

9 and to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies

10 and activities.

Æ
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 268

Designating July 22 as ‘‘National Fragile X Awareness Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 2000

Mr. EDWARDS (for himself, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. ROBB, Mrs. BOXER, Mr.

KERREY, Mr. HELMS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr.

BAYH, Mr. L. CHAFEE, Mr. HOLLINGS, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. REED, Mr.

SHELBY, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. GRAMM,

Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. KERRY,

Mr. LEVIN, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. COCHRAN, and Mr. MCCAIN) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 12, 2000

Committee discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating July 22 as ‘‘National Fragile X Awareness

Day’’.

Whereas Fragile X is the most common inherited cause of

mental retardation, affecting people of every race, income

level, and nationality;

Whereas 1 in every 260 women is a carrier of the Fragile X

defect;
2

SRES 268 ATS

Whereas 1 in every 4,000 children is born with the Fragile

X defect, and typically requires a lifetime of special care

at a cost of over $2,000,000;

Whereas Fragile X remains frequently undetected due to its

recent discovery and the lack of awareness about the disease, even within the medical community;

Whereas the genetic defect causing Fragile X has been discovered, and is easily identified by testing;

Whereas inquiry into Fragile X is a powerful research model

for neuropsychiatric disorders, such as autism, schizophrenia, pervasive developmental disorders, and other

forms of X-linked mental retardation;

Whereas individuals with Fragile X can provide a homogeneous research population for advancing the understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders;

Whereas with concerted research efforts, a cure for Fragile

X may be developed;

Whereas Fragile X research, both basic and applied, has been

vastly underfunded despite the prevalence of the disorder,

the potential for the development of a cure, the established benefits of available treatments and intervention,

and the significance that Fragile X research has for related disorders; and

Whereas the Senate as an institution and Members of Congress as individuals are in unique positions to help raise

public awareness about the need for increased funding for

research and early diagnosis and treatment for the disorder known as Fragile X: Now, therefore, be it
3

SRES 268 ATS

Resolved, That the Senate designate July 22, 2000 as

‘‘National Fragile X Awareness Day’’.

Æ