alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-19-00043- CR

Warre n And rew Conf

er, A ppellan t
v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 368 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NO. 02- 677- K3 68, H ONO RAB LE B URT CARNES, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Warren Andre w Confer filed a notice of appea l of his Aug ust 28, 2003 judgme nt of conviction for eng ag ing in org anized cri m i n al ac t ivity
. See Tex. Pen. Code § 71.02. The rec ord ref lects that Confer is attempting a s ec o n d ap p ea l of that conviction, which we aff irmed in 2005. Confer v. State , No. 03-03-00546- CR, 2005 Tex. App. L EXI S 2820, at *13 (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 14, 2005, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not desig nated for publ ication). Ou r m an d at e in that appea l issued Dec ember 20, 2005. Confer sub s eq u en t l y filed an application for postconviction writ of habea s corpus, which the Court of Criminal Appea ls denied November 21, 201 8
. S ee Tex. Code Crim Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. Confer then filed this notice of a ppeal January

16, 2019. Confer’ s 2019 notice of appea l a s to his 2003 conviction for e ng ag ing in org anized criminal activity is untimely , and he is n o t entitled to a second appea l of that same conviction. Under the circ umstances , we l ack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appea l in any mannerother than by dismiss ing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 526 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996) (dismissing purported appea l for lack of jurisdiction based on untimely notice of
a p p e a l) ; s e e a ls o H

in e s v . S ta te , 7 0 S. W. 9 5 5 , 9 5 7 ( T e x. Cr im
. A p p . 1 9 0 3 ) ( “ [O ]n ly o n e a

p p e a l c a n b e made from a verdic t and judgme nt of conviction in any case .”); McD onald v. State , 401 S.W .3d 360, 361-63 (Tex. App.—Amar illo 2013, pet. ref ’d) (dismissing for want o f j u ri sdiction defe ndant’s subsequent appea l of conviction that had previously been aff irmed); see also Parrett v. State , No. 03-14-00273- CR, 2014 Tex. App. L EXI S 5788, at *1-2 n.2 (Tex. App.—Austin May 30, 2014, no pet.) (me m. op., not designa ted for publication) (same)
.

The a ppeal is dismissed for wa nt of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________ J eff Rose, Chief J ustice
Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Ke lly and Smith Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: F ebrua

ry 22, 2019 Do Not Publish

2
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: November 15, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayD. Keith LaVanwayVice President  Finance,Chief Financial Officer,Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
 -28-
#### James MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2339.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 9, 1987.

*775FRANK, Judge.

James Morgan appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Morgan entered a plea of no contest to charges of first degree murder and robbery. He was sentenced to life and a concurrent fifteen year term. He now claims not to have been made aware that the murder sentence required a mandatory twenty-five year minimum prison term.* If Morgan’s assertion is correct, he may be entitled to withdraw his plea. *See, e.g., Perez v. State,*449 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). In response to the motion the trial court attached the transcript of a plea colloquy and a rights waiver form signed by Morgan. The specific allegations of Morgan’s motion are not refuted by the attachments. Although the transcript and waiver form mention the minimum mandatory sentence, we do not find any indication that that sentence was explained to Morgan. Instead, it appears from the transcript and the waiver form that they relate to another, separate set of non-capital felony charges to which Morgan entered a plea for a guidelines sentence to run consecutively with the life sentence.

The remaining issues presented in Morgan’s motion are without merit, i.e., separate sentences for first degree felony murder and the underlying felony do not violate the constitutional proscription against double jeopardy, *State v. Chapin,*486 So.2d 566 (Fia.1986), and his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is facially deficient. We hold that the trial court properly denied relief on both these grounds.

Upon remand the trial court is directed to reexamine the files and records in this matter to ascertain whether they demonstrate that Morgan was informed he would be required to serve no less than twenty-five years as a part of his life sentence. If the records so indicate the court may again deny the motion, attaching whatever documentation it relies upon in reaching that conclusion. Otherwise the court is to conduct an evidentiary hearing on this one issue. If the court again denies the motion Morgan must file a notice of appeal within thirty days to obtain further appellate review.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

*

 §§ 775.082(1), 782.04(1), Fla.Stat. (1985).
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications


The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical
Technology & Innovations, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Medical Technology & Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by
Medical Technology & Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

January 8, 2007                      /s/ Jeremy Feakins
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jeremy Feakins (Chief executive officer)

January 8, 2007                      /s/ Jennifer Herman
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jennifer Herman (Chief financial officer)





















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE ex rel. Tyronne TYLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-0108.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Tyler, Tyronne; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 300-072.

Granted for the purpose of transferring to the Court of Appeal, 4th Circuit, for its consideration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

## Correction

                    The National Science Foundation published a Notice of Meeting in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 19, 2012. The notice was published on page 16076, column 3. The notice incorrectly states that the meeting is on April 7-8, 2012.                

This notice announces the corrected date and time of the meeting. The correct meeting information is as follows:

*Name:*                         Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee (66).                    

*Date/Time:*                         April 5, 2012, 9 a.m.-6 p.m., April 6, 2012, 9 a.m.-3 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, (703) 292-8807.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning NSF science and education activities within the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.                    

*Agenda:*                         Update on current status of Directorate, Report of MPS Committee of Visitors, Report of NSF Advisory Subcommittees, Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate, Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Activities.                    

*Summary Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

Dated: March 20, 2012.

Susanne E. Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-7040 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**MATHEW GRUBEL, ERIC TOMLINSON, FRANCES BYERS, CAROL M.**  **COCCAGNA, AND THE CLASS THEY**
**REPRESENT,**

**Petitioners**

**v.**

**CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 710 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**

**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
ACCEPTED01-15-00371-CVFIRST COURT OF APPEALSHOUSTON, TEXAS12/1/2015 1:48:39 PMCHRISTOPHER PRINECLERK
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20320 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SYLVESTER LEON WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-916-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Sylvester Leon Wright on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Wright has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 178 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 178

   Designating the week beginning September 19, 1999, as ``National 
          Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

 Mr. Thurmond (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. 
   Torricelli, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Robb, Mr. Frist, Mrs. 
Lincoln, Mr. Thompson, Mr. Mack, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Lott, 
Mr. Specter, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
  Grassley, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. 
  Craig, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Sessions) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Designating the week beginning September 19, 1999, as ``National 
          Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''.

Whereas there are 105 historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States;
Whereas black colleges and universities provide the quality education so 
        essential to full participation in a complex, highly technological 
        society;
Whereas black colleges and universities have a rich heritage and have played a 
        prominent role in American history;
Whereas black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged 
        students to attain their full potential through higher education; and
Whereas the achievements and goals of historically black colleges and 
        universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ``NATIONAL HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND 
              UNIVERSITIES WEEK''.

    The Senate--
            (1) designates the week beginning September 19, 1999, as 
        ``National Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week''; 
        and
            (2) requests that the President of the United States issue 
        a proclamation calling on the people of the United States and 
        interested groups to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate support for 
        historically black colleges and universities in the United 
        States.
                                 <all>
```
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS **AUSTIN**

## 873

Bon. COO. x. 00x, pege 8 “Act. 7c50. Saoitory 

### ambatlon an& health

_. _

### tu drh to dTso*

able in 

### the negatlm. that the law rewire8 

### 044 Y o t m l 8teatlon i s 0 a ll . a w



### *AU healthoertitioata8 e&lledfor by Shl8 

### Aqt.swll be dlrplaywl ior p"sBlla

inrpeatioa ut the plaosMmm tlm pu8On lwud tnla emplo~d, uld shallaot be roaorti frum ouoh 

### ylaoedurtigthe Ooatlnaanoo Q? mmh **erap10meW** weapt 

### ?ir.e publia healthEo1:. ceil. 3. Gas, y&&4 6me. o&o. a-. CQX, ps@ns b.%’

1.5., I~.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of U.S.
Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 25,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Scott J. Miller, Chief Reporting and Compliance Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



By:
   /s/ Scott J. MillerScott J. MillerChief Reporting
	and Compliance Officer(Principal
	Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date: April 6, 2006
#### Thomas ANNISON, et al. v. Herbert HOOVER, et al.

No. 88-C-0182.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Annison, Thomas; Annison, Daniel Randolph; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1534; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 40871. *>r:, .

*149Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 420.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 162

To authorize testimony of employee of the Senate in State of New Mexico

v. Felix Lucero Chavez.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 26, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize testimony of employee of the Senate in State

of New Mexico v. Felix Lucero Chavez.

Whereas, in the case of State of New Mexico v. Felix Lucero

Chavez, No. CR–4646–99, pending in the Metropolitan

Court for Bernalillo County, New Mexico, a subpoena has

been served on Kristen Ludecke, an employee of the Senate;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States

and rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate; and

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or

in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will
2

SRES 162 ATS

promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate, Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That Kristen Ludecke is authorized to tes2 tify in the case of State of New Mexico v. Felix Lucero

3 Chavez, except concerning matters for which a privilege

4 should be asserted.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 
 Certification of Principal Accounting
Officer Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock Corporation
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 
 
 Date: December
15,
2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ 
Richard Di Stefano
 By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 62 (Friday, March 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13050 and <greek-i>13051]


Kentucky Disaster Number KY-00045

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated 03/16/2012.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 02/29/2012 through 03/03/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/20/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/15/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/17/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the Commonwealth of 
Kentucky, dated 03/16/2012, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Ballard, Johnson, Kenton, Larue, Pendleton, Trimble, 
Wolfe.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7654 Filed 3-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P