alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EPA/SEHSC D4 ECA MONITORING PROGRAM

DRAFT MEETING AGENDA

JULY 15, 2014

11:00 AM – 1:00 PM EDT

US EPA 

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON EAST BUILDING

1201 CONSTITUTION AVE., NW 

WASHINGTON, DC 20460 

Call-In Number/Code: (866) 299-3188/2025642474 

Introductions/Meeting Goals K. Thomas 

 

Update on SEHSC Site Selection &Site Access Agreements R. Mait 

POTW Feedback, Contact Process, Pool of Candidate POTWs R. Mait 

Impact of Study Plan Submission Extension Request on Initiating of Sampling R. Mait

EPA Assistance with Securing Candidate Sites SEHSC/EPA 

Next Steps K. Thomas 

 

 Adjourn
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL


EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report of Profire Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brenton W. Hatch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.











Date:
March 17, 2011

By:
/s/ Brenton W. HatchBrenton W. HatchChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2340-2341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-736]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7757]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Snapshot: Painters and Photography, Bonnard to 
Vuillard''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Snapshot: Painters and Photography, 
Bonnard to Vuillard'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC, from on or 
about February 4, 2012, until on or about May 6, 2012, the Indianapolis 
Museum of Art, Indianpolis, IN, from on or about June 8, 2012, until on 
or about September 2, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to

[[Page 2341]]

be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-736 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Lucius R. SWASEY, George L. Swasey and John A. Swasey, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ROCKY POINT DITCH COMPANY, Melvin J. Abbott, Howard M. Cowan, Harvey Gee, Kipp Merkley, John Munz, Lloyd Remund, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. 17971.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 25, 1982.

M. Dayle Jeffs, Provo, for plaintiffs and appellants.

E. Craig Smay, Park City, for defendants and respondents.

PER CURIAM:

Defendants move to dismiss this appeal due to inadequacies of plaintiffs’ supersede-as bond or in the alternative, to require plaintiffs to post a proper bond. Defendants contend that the bond filed in this matter does not meet the requirements of Rule 73(d), U.R.C.P., and that it fails to offer meaningful assurances to defendants.1

By motion, defendants objected to the sufficiency of the bond in the district court. Inasmuch as the record had already been transmitted to this Court for appeal purposes, the district court declined to hear the matter. Now, before this Court, defendants argue that the bond is not sufficient, while the plaintiffs argue that it is sufficient.

Rule 73(e), Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, provides as follows:

> If a bond on appeal or a supersedeas bond is not filed within the time specified, or if the bond filed is found insufficient, and if the record on appeal has not been filed in the Supreme Court, a bond may be filed at such time before the record is so filed as may be fixed by the district court. After the record is so filed, application for leave to file a bond may be made only in the Supreme Court.

As indicated on numerous occasions, this Court is ill-equipped to take evidence.2 This matter clearly calls for a factual determination, which necessitates the taking of evidence.

We therefore grant leave under the foregoing rule and direct the district court to take any evidence it may deem appropriate and to rule upon the question as to the adequacy of plaintiffs’ supersedeas bond.

*So ordered.*

1

. Defendants allege that the “bond” consists of a representation that plaintiffs will pay, the only “sureties” being plaintiffs and their wives.

2

. See, e.g., *State v. Larocco,*Utah, 649 P.2d 2 (No. 18267, also filed this date).
EXHIBIT 4(ppp)

       Letter of Consent to the proposed merger from German American Capital 
                          Corporation to CRIIMI MAE Inc.





                       GERMAN AMERICAN CAPITAL CORPORATION
                         31 West 52nd Street, 3rd Floor
                               New York, NY 10019
                              Tel:  (212) 469-6949
                              Fax:  (212) 469-7210


June 20, 1995


Ms. Cynthia O. Azzara
CRIIMI MAE Inc.
11200 Rockville Pike
Rockville, MD 20852

RE:  Committed Master Repurchase Agreement dated as of January 23, 1995, between
     German American Capital Corporation, Inc., ("GACC") as Buyer and CRIIMI MAE
     Inc., as seller and Committed Master Repurchase Agreement Governing
     Purchases and Sales of Participation Certificates dated as of January 23,
     1995, between GACC and CRIIMI (the "Facilities").

Dear Ms. Azzara:

GACC hereby consents to the proposed merger (the "Merger") between CRIIMI MAE
Inc. and/or its affiliates ("CRIIMI") and the CRI Mortgage Businesses ("CRI"),
as described in the Proxy Statement dated April 28, 1995, and to CRIIMI's
actions as may be necessary to effectuate the Merger subject to the following:
(i) the issuance of a fairness opinion by Duff & Phelps, and (ii) the Merger
does not cause an Event of Default under either of the Facilities.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.

Sincerely,


/s/ John H. Cutting, III                 /s/ Joseph G. Kiely
------------------------                --------------------
Vice President                          Vice President<PAGE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JONATHAN BOMBART, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF

LOUIS BOMBART
, Appellant,

v.

ALLEN BOMBART and FELICE BOMBART
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 21

- 2698

[ May 19, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; James Martz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CP

- 002685

- XXXX

- SB

.

William F. Rhodes of William F. Rhodes, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Anthony Murphy of Jermaine O'Neill Thomp son, P.A., Oakland Park, for appellee Allen Bombart.

Daniel Doorakian of Katz & Doorakian Law Firm, P.L., West Palm Beach, for appellee Felice Bombart.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER
, C.J., D AMOORGIAN and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

October 29, 2015

No. 10-15-00364-CR

JEREMIAH TENNON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,693

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

PER CURIAM

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  accompanying  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  (the "Report") of Diamond  Entertainment  Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Fred U. Odaka,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:



(1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results

of operations of the Company.







/s/ Fred U. Odaka



----------------------



Fred U. Odaka



Title:  Chief Financial Officer Chief Accounting Officer)

Date:  June 29, 2004
#### Tim J. ALLEN v. TRAFFIC TRANSPORT ENGINEERING, INC. a/k/a Stuart Trailers.

No. 86-C-2515.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Allen, Tim J.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5118; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “B”, No. 83-19720.

Prior report: La.App., 496 So.2d 1122.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2219 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2219

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on waste of camel hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on waste of camel hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WASTE OF CAMEL HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.21 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to waste of camel hair) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gary JOSEPH.

No. 89-KH-1404.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Joseph, Gary; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 88-0831.

Denied. Moot. The relator’s bond has been reduced to $50,000.
WILLIAM T. MORRISON, JR.

,

Petitioner,

v.

JACKSON COUNTY, BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING A ND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3835

Opinion filed December 16, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

William T. Morrison, Jr., pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respond ent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 21

New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant



|                       |  |                        |   |  |                                                 
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------- | - |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiary             |  | Percentage ofOwnership |   |  | State of Incorporation                          
|Lake Sunapee Bank, fsb |  | 100                    | % |  | Incorporated under the laws of the United States
|NHTB Capital Trust I   |  | 100                    | % |  | Delaware                                        
|NHTB Capital Trust II  |  | 100                    | % |  | Connecticut                                     
|NHTB Capital Trust III |  | 100                    | % |  | Connecticut                                     

Subsidiaries of Lake Sunapee Bank, fsb



|                                      |  |                        |   |  |                       
|------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | - |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiary                            |  | Percentage ofOwnership |   |  | State of Incorporation
|Lake Sunapee Group, Inc.              |  | 100                    | % |  | New Hampshire         
|Lake Sunapee Financial Services Corp. |  | 100                    | % |  | New Hampshire
#### George BELLESHEIM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BO-349.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Pama D. Presnell, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Ro-yall P. Terry, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals contending the trial judge should have recused himself from the sentencing phase of the cause below and that the written judgment incorrectly reflects the sentence pronounced at the sentencing hearing. There is no error in the trial judge’s failure to recuse himself. *State ex rel Shelton v. Sepe,*254 So.2d 12 (Fla. 3rd DCA, 1971). However, the written judgment does incorrectly reflect appellant’s probationary terms for counts VIII and IX. Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of conforming the written judgment to the oral pronouncement of sentence. In all other respects, we affirm.

WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
# Službeni list C 57I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 057I |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Godište 63.20. veljače 2020. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 057I

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Godište 63.20. veljače 2020.

---

| Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Vijeće Europske unije |
| 2020/C 57 I/01 | Odluka Vijeća od 17. veljače 2020. o imenovanju člana Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za Njemačku | 1 |

Sadržaj

Stranica

Vijeće Europske unije

2020/C 57 I/01

Odluka Vijeća od 17. veljače 2020. o imenovanju člana Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za Njemačku

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Vijeće Europske unije

| 20.2.2020 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CI 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CI 57/1

---

ODLUKA VIJEĆA

od 17. veljače 2020.

o imenovanju člana Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za Njemačku

(2020/C 57 I/01)

VIJEĆE EUROPSKE UNIJE,

uzimajući u obzir Ugovor o funkcioniranju Europske unije,

uzimajući u obzir Uredbu (EZ) br. 1922/2006 Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o osnivanju Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova (1), a posebno njezin članak 10.,

uzimajući u obzir popise kandidata koji su Vijeću podnijele vlade država članica,

budući da:

| (1) | Odlukom od 27. svibnja 2019. (2) Vijeće je imenovalo članove i zamjenike članova Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za razdoblje od 1. lipnja 2019. do 31. svibnja 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Odlukom od 27. svibnja 2019. (2) Vijeće je imenovalo članove i zamjenike članova Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za razdoblje od 1. lipnja 2019. do 31. svibnja 2022.

| (2) | Njemačka vlada podnijela je prijedlog za imenovanje za jedno mjesto člana koje treba popuniti, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Njemačka vlada podnijela je prijedlog za imenovanje za jedno mjesto člana koje treba popuniti,

DONIJELO JE OVU ODLUKU:

Članak 1.

Sljedeća osoba imenuje se članom Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova za Njemačku do kraja tekućeg mandata koji istječe 31. svibnja 2022.:

PREDSTAVNICI VLADA

| Zemlja | Član | Zamjenik člana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Njemačka | Gđa Daniela BEHRENS | |

Zemlja

Član

Zamjenik člana

Njemačka

Gđa Daniela BEHRENS

Članak 2.

Ova Odluka stupa na snagu na dan donošenja.

Sastavljeno u Brisel, 17. veljače 2020.

Za Vijeće

Predsjednik

J.BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  SL L 403, 30.12.2006., str. 9.

1

(2)  Odluka Vijeća od 27. svibnja 2019. o imenovanju članova i zamjenika članova Upravnog odbora Europskog instituta za ravnopravnost spolova (SL C 185, 29.05.2019., str. 1.).

2

---
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Patrick VALDEZ, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 18855.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 11, 1984.

*1335Joan Watt, Legal Defender, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorms, Jack L. Crellin, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

Defendant appeals his nonjury conviction for one count of possession of a forged writing and one count of possession of devices to make a forged writing, under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-502. At trial, the State introduced evidence that officers had found in a closed attache case taken from the trunk of the car defendant was driving. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it refused to suppress the evidence. We hold that it did not and affirm.

In the early morning of October 25, 1981, police officers stopped defendant and a female companion when they noticed that defendant’s car had no front license plate. Defendant produced a driver’s license with his photograph on it, but with a false name. Defendant was arrested for giving false information to a police officer.

When questioned, defendant stated that he did not own the car. Immediately, the officers searched the car without first obtaining a warrant. They discovered an attache case in the trunk. The case was closed, but a portion of a check was protruding from the case. The officers opened the case and discovered certain items of false identification with defendant’s picture on them. The trunk and the attache case also contained paraphernalia used in making false identification documents.

At trial, the contents of the trunk and case were introduced against defendant. Defendant produced one witness who testified that neither the attache case nor the automobile belonged to defendant, that the witness owned the case and its contents, and that the witness had borrowed the car from a body shop.

Defendant relies on *United States v. Chadwick,*433 U.S. 1, 97 S.Ct. 2476, 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977), and *Arkansas v. Sanders,*442 U.S. 753, 99 S.Ct. 2586, 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979), in claiming that the warrantless search violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The State argues that the officers conducted an inventory search and, therefore, that no warrant was necessary. *State v. Criscola,*21 Utah 2d 272, 444 P.2d 517 (1968); *South Dakota v. Opperman,*428 U.S. 364, 96 S.Ct. 3092, 49 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1976).

We do not reach the question of whether this search was permissible under the state or federal constitution. Defendant concedes that he did not own the car or the attache ease containing the evidence complained of, and he has failed to show that he had any legitimate expectation of privacy in the effects searched. Under long-established precedent, he lacks any standing to complain of the resulting search. *E.g., State v. Purcell,*Utah, 586 P.2d 441 (1978); *Rakas v. Illinois,*439 U.S. 128, 98 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978),

Affirmed.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheets and statement of operations found on pages F-2 and F-5 of the Company's
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           224,331 
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    100,335
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 359,294
<PP&E>                                           237,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                   115,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   936,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            794,858
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           1,381
<OTHER-SE>                                       134,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     936,640 
<SALES>                                          392,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  392,125
<CGS>                                             142,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  892,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (643,554)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (7,198)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (643,554)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.05)

</TABLE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 215

Making changes to Senate committees for the 106th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Making changes to Senate committees for the 106th

Congress.

1 Resolved, That the following change shall be effective

2 on those Senate committees listed below for the 106th

3 Congress, or until their successors are appointed:

4 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS:

5 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Chairman.

Æ