AFS-12-059-E 

November 21, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10392 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1214 

Ms. Rocio Lynn Jasso 

Parent of Stephanie Lynn Hosken 

2102E 34th Street 

Joplin, MO 64804 

Dear Ms. Jasso: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By submission received October 26, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Stephanie Lynn Hosken for an exemption from 

§ 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow Ms. Hosken to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child 

restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child 

restraint system (CRS) aboard an aircraft. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Stephanie Lynn Hosken. 

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 10056 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the petitioner also required relief from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). This states, in part, 

“The child must be properly secured in the restraint system and must not exceed the specific 

weight limit for the restraint system.” The FAA recognized that compliance with this specific 

requirement was the responsibility of the certificate holder, not the individual. However, in 
2 

that unique situation, the FAA believed that the public interest was not served by requiring 

the petitioner to ask air carriers to petition the FAA on his or her behalf every time the 

petitioner wished to travel on a commercial air carrier. The FAA further found that the 

petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems 

by persons with disabilities. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Ms. Stephanie Lynn Hosken an exemption from 

14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating 

under part 121 while Ms. Hosken is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

§ 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Ms. Hosken to exceed the specified 

weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard an aircraft. 

Condition and Limitation 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Ms. Hosken’s 

parents or a caregiver accompanying her. Ms. Hosken may only occupy a passenger seat with 

no passenger seated behind her. In addition, Ms. Hosken’s parent or caregiver must carry a 

copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 

48 hours before the date of each flight. 

This exemption terminates on November 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure