alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Matthew S. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hereby certify,to the best of my knowledge, in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) on the date hereof, that:



| |   |                                                                                                                      
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | · | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |   |                                                                                                                                                     
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | · | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

Date:




October 1,

 2008



| |                                                                       
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/

M

ATTHEW L. S

CHISSLER                                         
| | Matthew L. Schissler                                                  
| | Chairman

, Chief Executive Officer,






and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Glenn J. Heiar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: April 30, 2007

|  | By:         /s/ Glenn J. Heiar             Name:    Glenn J. Heiar Title:       Chief Financial Officer |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NATHAN B. WILLIAMS and JASON D. WILLIAMS,

Appellants,

v.

CLARIZA VERA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2418

[September 8, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Keathan B. Frink, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-16900.

Lamont Mignott of Mignott Law, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Ryan S. Shipp and Andrew J. Rochen of Law Office of Ryan S. Shipp, 

PLLC, Lantana, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
3. Paragraph A.16 ofArticle II is amended to add the following sentence before the last sentence:“If the Plan is terminated prior to the last day of the Limitation Year, thepreceding sentence shall apply.” 4. Paragraph A.23 of Article II is amended to add the following paragraph:For Plan Years beginning after June 30, 2007, if amounts are paid to a Participanton account of severance from employment, such payment shall not be subject to acash or deferred election by the Participant unless paid by the later of two andone-half(21/2) months after severance from employment or the end of the Plan Yearthat includes the severance from employment and is considered Section 415Compensation. The preceding sentence shall not apply to continuation payments onaccount of qualified military service as defined in Section 414(u)(1) of the Codeor payments on account of Total disability as defined in Paragraph A.89 of thisArticle 11, notwithstanding the definition that appears in Article I. 5. Paragraph A.76 of Article II is amended to add the following paragraphs:“Except for continuation payments on account of qualified military service asdefined in Section 414(q)(1) of the Code or Total Disability as defined inParagraph A.89 of Article II (notwithstanding the definition that appears inArticle I), for Limitation Years beginning after June 30, 2007, severance pay shallbe considered Section 415 Compensation only if paid by the later of two andone-half(21/2) months after severance from employment with the Employermaintaining the Plan or the end of the Limitation Year that includes the date ofseverance from employment with the Employer maintaining the Plan. Severance payshall only be considered Section 415 Compensation if such payments are nototherwise excluded in the definition of Compensation and would have been paid priorto such Employee’s severance from employment if the Employee had continued in theemployment of the Employer.Severance payments of unused accrued bona fide sick, vacation or other leave shallbe considered Section 415 Compensation only if the Employee would have been able touse the leave if employment had continued and such payments are not excluded underArticle I.Severance payments from an unfunded nonqualified deferred compensation plan shallonly be considered Section 415 Compensation if not excluded under Article I, thepayment would have been paid to the Employee at the same time if the Employee hadcontinued hisemployment with the Employer and such payment is includible in the Employee’s grossincome.Any other payment not described above shall not be considered Section 415Compensation if paid after severance from employment with the Employer maintainingthe Plan.”
 
 

 
 6. Paragraph F of Article V is amended to add the following sentence:“For Limitation Years beginning after June 30, 2007, excess Annual Additions canonly be held within a suspense account if the Plan is eligible for self-correctionunder Section 9 of IRS Revenue Procedure 2006-27.”IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer executes this Amendment on this 30th day of October,2008.      **BIOMED REALTY, L.P.**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statement of New Frontier Media, Inc. included in the Company's Form 
10-K for the period ended March 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            503123
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     813456
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       182508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3289647
<PP&E>                                           1113428
<DEPRECIATION>                                     62209
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10747949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2275911
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             654
<OTHER-SE>                                       8447752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10747949
<SALES>                                          1645192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1645192
<CGS>                                            2021404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1415002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  159454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1595548
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                131096
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3258343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1950668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1595548)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3258343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.73)
        



</TABLE>
Levy Rates 

Tax Calculator 

Select County

Muskogee County Levy Rates

2010

District Code School District Levy Rate

4A Boynton 88.44

4B Boynton SD (Rural) 88.44

46A Braggs 74.79

46B Braggs SD (Rural) 74.79

J19B Checotah SD 100.47

3A Fort Gibson 91.77

3C Fort Gibson (No Sinking) 86.40

3B Fort Gibson SD (Rural) 86.40
3B-MUS Fort Gibson SD (Muskogee) 87.19

J6B Gore SD 77.21

2A Haskell 96.70

2B Haskell SD (Rural) 96.70

29B Hilldale SD (Rural) 74.97

29A Hilldale SD (Muskogee) 75.76

29C Hilldale SD (Muskogee - No Sinking) 74.97

J27B Midway SD (Rural) 83.96

J27A Midway SD (Council Hill) 83.96

20A Muskogee 93.41

20C Muskogee (No Sinking) 92.62

20B Muskogee SD (Rural) 92.62

20B-GBFD Muskogee SD (Rural - Gooseneck Bend FD) 96.14

8A Oktaha 101.73

8B Oktaha SD (Rural) 101.73

88A Porum 105.24

88B Porum SD (Rural) 105.24

20A-SUM Summit (Muskogee SD) 92.62

4A-TAFT Taft (Boynton SD) 88.44

9A Wainwright 76.43

9B Wainwright SD (Rural) 76.43

74A Warner 84.80

74B Warner SD (Rural) 84.80

6A Webber Falls 103.33

6B Webber Falls SD (Rural) 103.33
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      February 11, 2011
            By:
            /s/ Liu
      ChuanjieName:
            Liu
      ChuanjieTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Financial andAccounting
      Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.0

                            CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of
the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 23, 2004


/s/Matthew L. Schissler
-----------------------------
Matthew L. Schissler
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted T. Awerkamp, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.





/s/ Ted T. AwerkampTed T. AwerkampPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 16, 2011
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Diamond Entertainment Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended March
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Mulugetta Bezzabeh, Phd, Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.








/s/
Mulugetta Bezzabeh,
Phd


Mulugetta
Bezzabeh, Phd


Principal
Financial Officer


Date:
September 5, 2008
Exhibit 32.1



                     Certification Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Strategic
Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John P. O'Shea, President of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results or operations of the
        Company.



/s/ JOHN P. O'SHEA                                               March 31, 2010
---------------------------------
John P. O'Shea
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Annual Report of Presstek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended January 1, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Cook, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


March 16, 2011
/s/ Jeffrey A. CookJeffrey A. Cook

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 10608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03560]

[[Page 10608]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings, Cancellation

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 78, No. 27, 
Friday, February 8, 2013, page 9387.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Wednesday, February 13, 2013, 10 
a.m.-11 a.m.

MEETING CANCELED. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: February 12, 2013.
 Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-03560 Filed 2-12-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-51188

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

REYNALDO MEDINA-SANCHEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-1803

Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reynaldo Medina-Sanchez (Medina) pleaded guilty of illegal reentry and

was sentenced within the guidelines range to a 24-month term of 

imprisonment and to a two-year period of supervised release. On appeal, 

Medina contends that his conviction should be overturned because the district 

court failed to advise him of his right to counsel and of its obligation to apply 

the Sentencing Guidelines.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 24, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-51188 Document: 00512846586 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/24/2014
No. 13-51188

We have reviewed these questions for plain error. See United States v. 

Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 58-59 (2002). To show plain error, Medina must show 

a forfeited error that is clear or obvious and that affects his substantial rights. 

See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009). If he makes such 

a showing, this court has the discretion to correct the error but only if it 

seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial 

proceedings. See id.

The district court failed to advise Medina of his right to counsel, 

appointed if necessary, at trial and at every stage of the proceeding. See FED.

R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(1)(D). The error did not affect Medina’s substantial rights, 

however. See Puckett, 556 U.S. at 135. Medina was represented initially by 

appointed counsel and did not equivocate in entering his guilty plea. He has 

not shown that there is a “reasonable probability that, but for the error, he 

would not have entered the plea.” United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 

U.S. 74, 83 (2004); see United States v. Cuevas-Andrade, 232 F.3d 440, 445 (5th 

Cir. 2000).

Medina further contends that the district court did not address him 

personally and did not advise him adequately that it was obligated to consult 

the Guidelines. See FED. R. CRIM. P. 11(b)(1)(M). Because the record does not 

support these contentions, no error is discernible, plain or otherwise. The 

judgment is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 13-51188 Document: 00512846586 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/24/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,081,267
<SECURITIES>                                   472,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,824
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,577,801
<PP&E>                                       3,661,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,238,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          248,297
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,990,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,238,873
<SALES>                                        382,320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,420,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,196
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,277,318
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,277,318
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,277,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   188.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   188.97


</TABLE>
#### ST. LANDRY PARISH CLERK OF COURT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ST. LANDRY PARISH POLICE JURY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 87-1060.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Dec. 14, 1988.

Writ Denied Feb. 17, 1989.

Alex Andrus, Opelousas, for St. Landry Parish Police Jury.

James Dauzat, Dauzat, Falgoust, Caviness & Bienvenu, Frank Trosclair, Jr., Taylor & Trosclair, Robert DeJean, Jr., Opelau-sas, Thomas Arbour, Glusman, Moore, Wilkinson, Arbour, Broyles & Glusman, Port Allen, Gerard Caswell, Winston Ardoin, Jackson Burson, Eunice, Kenneth DeJean, Baton Rouge, C. Douglas Dean, Otis Lom-enick, Opelousas, for St. Landry Parish Clerk of Court.

Before STOKER, LABORDE and KING, JJ.

LABORDE, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial and appeal with a companion suit, *St. Landry Parish Police Jury v. Clerk of Court of St. Landry Parish, et al.,*536 So.2d 1283 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988), also decided on this date.

For reasons assigned in the aforesaid case, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are taxed to appellant.

AFFIRMED.