alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00316-CV

IN THE MATTER OF M.T.F.-S.

From the County Court at Law

Coryell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-2333

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court, sitting as a juvenile court, signed an order waiving jurisdiction over 

this case and transferring Appellant M.T.F.-S., a seventeen-year-old juvenile, to district 

court. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 54.02 (West 2014). Appellant subsequently filed a notice 

of appeal. See id. § 56.01(c) (West Supp. 2018). We eventually abated the appeal because 

Appellant had not responded to any of our correspondence. The abatement order stated: 

[T]he Court abates this cause to the trial court for a hearing to determine: 

(1) why the Court has received no response from Appellant; (2) whether 

Appellant still desires to proceed with this appeal; (3) whether Appellant’s 

attorney has abandoned the appeal; and (4) whether the appointment of an 

attorney to represent Appellant in this appeal is necessary.

The trial court held a hearing, and we have received a supplemental reporter’s 

record from the hearing. At the hearing, Appellant’s right to appeal was validly waived 
In the Matter of M.T.F.-S. Page 2

under section 51.09 of the Texas Family Code. See id. § 51.09 (West 2014). The waiver 

was made by Appellant and her attorney; Appellant and her attorney were informed of 

and understood the right and the possible consequences of waiving it; the waiver was 

voluntary, and the waiver was made in court proceedings that were recorded. See id. 

No written motion to dismiss has been filed in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. 

However, we believe that good cause exists to implement Rule 2 to suspend the operation 

of Rule 42.1 in this case. See id. R. 2. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See In re 

B.K.M., No. 01-02-00827-CV, 2003 WL 360935, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 

13, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing juvenile’s appeal following hearing in juvenile 

court where juvenile validly waived right to appeal under section 51.09).

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Senior Justice Scoggins1

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed February 13, 2019

[CV06]

 

1 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the 

Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0057 IN THE MATTER OF: D.A.T. A Youth. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 6, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Jim Rice Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2021

06/07/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0057
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

SAFLINK Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements (Nos. 333-92072,
333-74253, 033-68832, and 333-118249) on Form S-8, registration statements (Nos. 033-62430, 333-75789, 333-23467, 333-01510, 333-58575, 333-54084, 333-112287, 333-119778, and 333-114594) on Form S-3, registration statement (No. 333-97221) on Form
S-2 and registration statement (No. 333-68642) on Form S-1 of SAFLINK Corporation of our report dated March 15, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of SAFLINK Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004,
annual report on Form 10-K of SAFLINK Corporation.



/s/ KPMG LLP



|                   
|-------------------
|Seattle, Washington
|March 28, 2005
```

[Federal Register: March 23, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 55)]
[Notices]               
[Page 13757]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23mr10-57]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 9, 2010, the Department of Energy published a notice 
announcing an open meeting of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's 
Nuclear Future (the Commission). In that notice, the starting time for 
the Thursday, March 25, 2010, meeting listed under DATES was indicated 
as 1 p.m. The starting time has been updated. The open meeting will now 
begin at 11 a.m. on Thursday, March 25, 2010, break at 12:30 p.m., and 
reconvene at 1:30 p.m.
    Also, in that notice under PUBLIC PARTICIPATION it was indicated 
that individuals and representatives of organizations may offer 
comments at the end of the meeting on Friday, March 26, 2010. Those 
wishing to speak at the end of the meeting should register to do so 
beginning at 8 a.m. on Friday morning, March 26, 2010. The time 
allotted per speaker will depend on the number who wish to speak but 
will not exceed 5 minutes. Those unable to attend the meeting or do not 
have sufficient time to speak may send their written statement to 
Timothy A. Frazier, U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, 
SW., Washington DC 20585, or e-mail CommissionDFO@nuclear.energy.gov.
    Additionally, every effort is being made to live webcast the 
meeting. Additional information will be available regarding the webcast 
via the Department of Energy Web site at http://www.energy.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 18, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-6364 Filed 3-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report of El Pollo Loco,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven E. Carley, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Stephen E. Carley                
|Stephen E. Carley                    
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|El Pollo Loco, Inc.                  
|August 12, 2005                      



This certification is made solely for
the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Pollo Loco, Inc. and will be retained by El Pollo Loco, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2
         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
         ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Au E-Mun hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Thai One On, Inc.,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Thai One On, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.
                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: November 1, 2005            /s/ Au E-Mun
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   By: Au E-Mun, Chief Financial Officer,
                                   Treasurer, Principal Accounting
                                   Officer and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.04

                               BCP/ESSEX HOLDINGS INC.

              AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK OPTION PLAN


    The BCP/Essex Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan 
(the "Plan") is amended as follows:

    1.  The first sentence of Section 3 of Plan is amended to read as follows:

    SECTION 3.  LIMITS ON OPTIONS.  The total number of Shares for which Options
    may be granted to Optionees under this Plan shall not exceed in the 
    aggregate 9,596,288.

    2.  Except as set forth in Paragraph 1 above, all other provisions of the 
    Plan remain unchanged.

    3.  The changes set forth in this Amendment are incorporated in the 
    BCP/Essex Holdings Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2656

GERALD F. FLENTJE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ITO CORPORATION OF BALTIMORE; INTERNATIONAL

LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO; LOCAL

953, INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S ASSOCIATION,

AFL-CIO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-99-2062-WMN)

Submitted: October 24, 2000 Decided: November 15, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ransom J. Davis, LAW OFFICES OF RANSOM J. DAVIS, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellant. Ernest L. Mathews, Elizabeth Alexander,

GLEASON & MATHEWS, P.C., New York, New York; James R. Rosenberg,

Paul D. Starr, ABATO, RUBENSTEIN & ABATO, P.A., Baltimore,

Maryland; Gil A. Abramson, HOGAN & HARTSON, L.L.P., Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gerald F. Flentje appeals the district court’s order dismissing his suit as barred by the statute of limitations. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Flentje v. ITO Corp., No. CA-99-2062-WMN (D.

Md. Nov. 10, 1999). Further, because Flentje did not timely request discovery and because his complaint did not support a tolling

of the statute of limitations, we find that the district court did

not err in failing to order discovery. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Oliver KING, Jr.

No. 88-KK-0107.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re King, Oliver Jr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 128860; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19709-KW.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

                            APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, CINDY K. SWANK, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date:  August 8, 2008

                                   By: /s/ Cindy K. Swank
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Cindy K. Swank, President
                                   Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
#### Joseph J. NICOLS, Jr., Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. Rosemary Jean NICOLS, Appellee/Cross Appellant. Rosemary Jean NICOLS, Appellant, v. Joseph J. NICOLS, Jr., Appellee.

Nos. 88-0522, 88-0869.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 12, 1988.

*1067Joseph S. Paglino of Law Office of Joseph S. Paglino, Miami, for Joseph J. Ni-cols, Jr.

Diane H. Tutt, Fort Lauderdale, for Rosemary Jean Nicols.

PER CURIAM.

The only issue meriting discussion is asserted in the cross appeal. The former wife here claims an entitlement to prejudgment interest in accordance with *Argonaut Insurance Co. v. May Plumbing Co.,*474 So.2d 212 (Fla.1985). We agree, the former wife is entitled to prejudgment interest since the husband did not comply with the agreed upon financial agreement adopted by the trial court in the final judgment.

Accordingly, the trial court erred in not awarding prejudgment interest. We reverse and remand the cross appeal for entry of a judgment in accordance herewith.

We affirm the main appeal.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40903

Conference Calendar

 

BRET CAHILL, Former Employees,

Job Seekers & Other Citizens of

the State of Texas,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF TEXAS; MIKE SHERIDAN, 

Jointly & severally,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-330

- - - - - - - - - -

June 13, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Bret Cahill appeals from the district court’s order denying

his motion for injunctive relief. Instead of specifically

addressing the four factors he must establish in order to prevail

on a request for a preliminary injunction, see Lakedreams v.

Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991), Cahill argues only

that the district court’s First Amendment forum analysis was

erroneous. The issue of the propriety of a preliminary

injunction, the only issue before this court, is therefore
No. 00-40903

-2-

considered abandoned on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). The district court did not abuse

its discretion by denying Cahill’s motion for a preliminary

injunction. See Lakedreams, 932 F.2d at 1106. 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I,Steven Tanner, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: November 14,2007

 
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Steven  Tanner          |
|                    |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6953]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Center: Mass Spectrometry Resource for Biology and Medicine.
    Date: April 1-3, 2012.
    Time: 8 p.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Westin Copley Place Hotel, 10 Huntington Avenue 
Boston, MA 02116.
    Contact Person: Mike Radtke, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4176, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-
1728, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#54263530203f3139143727267a3a3d3c7a333b22"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8cad9dcccd3ddd5f8dbcbca96d6d1d096dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a>

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 15, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6953 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>