alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that the Pledge

of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States be recited at the commencement of the daily session of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. HELMS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

RESOLUTION

To amend the Standing Rules of the Senate to require that

the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States

be recited at the commencement of the daily session

of the Senate.

Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is our Nation’s most revered and preeminent symbol;

Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is recognized and respected throughout the world as a symbol of

democracy, freedom, and human rights;

Whereas, in the words of the Chief Justice of the United

States, the Flag of the United States of America ‘‘in

times of national crisis, inspires and motivates the average citizen to make personal sacrifices in order to achieve
2

•SRES 113 IS

societal goals of overriding importance... and serves as a

reminder of the paramount importance of pursuing the

ideals that characterize our society’’;

Whereas the House of Representatives of the United States

has opened each of its daily sessions with the Pledge of

Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America

since 1988; and

Whereas opening each of the daily sessions of the Senate of

the United States with the Pledge of Allegiance to the

Flag of the United States would demonstrate reverence

for the Flag and serve as a daily reminder to all Senators

of the ideals that it represents: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1(a) of rule IV of the

2 Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by inserting

3 after ‘‘prayer by the Chaplain’’ the following: ‘‘and after

4 the Presiding Officer leads the Senate in reciting the

5 Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States’’.

Æ
Exhibit 3.1.6
 PAGE
1
 
 I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF MAGNUM
HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE NINTH DAY OF MAY, A.D. 2011, AT
11:50 OCLOCK A.M.
 A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THE NEW CASTLE COUNTY RECORDER OF
DEEDS.
  2758331 8100
 110508780
 You may
verify certificate online at corp.delaware.gov/authver.shtml
 
 /s/ Jeffrey W. BullockJeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary of StateAUTHENTICATION: 8746985DATE: 05-09-11




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 12:18 PM 05/09/2011FILED 11:50 AM 05/09/2011SRV 110508780  2758331 FILE
 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION
 (Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)
        - 1 -




---



##### 



th
 MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Gary C. EvansName:
    
    Gary C. EvansTitle:
    
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 - 2 -
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 71 (Wednesday, April 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 20806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8695]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending March 19, 
2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0053.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC31 North & Central Pacific (except between Korea (Rep. 
of), Malaysia and USA) Flex Fares Resolutions Geneva, 12-13 April 2010 
(Memo 0516).
    (a) TC31 North & Central Pacific (except between USA and Korea 
(Rep. of), Malaysia) Minutes (Memo 518).
    (b) TC31 North and Central Pacific (except between Korea (Rep. of), 
Malaysia and USA) Mail Vote 667--Resolution 111nn Flex Fares Package 
(Memo 0528).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0054.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: (a) TC31 North & Central Pacific Between Korea (Rep. of), 
Malaysia and USA Flex Fares Resolutions Geneva, 12-13 April 2010 (Memo 
0517).
    (b) TC31 North and Central Pacific between Korea (Rep. of), 
Malaysia and USA. Mail Vote 668--Resolution 111nn Flex Fares Package 
(Memo 0529).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0055.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: (a) TC123 North, Mid, South Atlantic (except between USA 
and Korea (Rep. of), Malaysia) Flex Fares Package--Resolutions (Memo 
0472).
    TC123 North, Mid, South Atlantic (except between USA and Korea 
(Rep. of), Malaysia) Minutes (Memo 0474).
    (b) TC123 North, Mid, South Atlantic (except between USA and Korea 
(Rep. of), Malaysia).
    Mail Vote 669 Resolution 111 at Flex Fares Package (Memo 0481).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0056.
    Date Filed: March 18, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: (a) TC123 North Atlantic Between USA and Korea (Rep. of), 
Malaysia Flex Fares Resolutions (Memo 0473).
    (b) TC123 North Atlantic Between USA and Korea (Rep. of), Malaysia 
Mail Vote 670.
    Resolution 111 at Flex Fares Package (Memo 0482).
    Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-8695 Filed 4-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
#### In re Regina McCLAY.

No. 86-OB-1310.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1986.

In re McClay, Regina; applying for permission to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination.

Granted. Relator is permitted to take the bar examination.
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-60635

Summary Calendar

 

FRANCISCO ALANIZ-SAENZ,

Petitioner,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. A21 578 011

- - - - - - - - - -

July 18, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Francisco Alaniz-Saenz petitions for review of the decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that he was deportable

under subsections 241(a)(2)(B)(i) and 241(a)(2)(C) of the

Immigration and Nationality Act (Act), 8 U.S.C.

§ 1251(a)(2)(B)(i) and 1251(a)(2)(C). Alaniz-Saenz argues that

the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) did not prove

that he was convicted of a firearm offense within the meaning of

§ 1251(a)(2)(C) and that there was a fatal variance between the 
No. 95-60635

- 2 -

INS’ pleading and the proof of the firearm offense. He maintains 

the INS alleged he was carrying a .32 caliber semi-automatic Colt

handgun, but failed to present evidence that he was convicted of

carrying that type of handgun. The BIA found the INS established

through clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence that AlanizSaenz’s conviction for carrying a handgun was a firearm offense

for which he was deportable under § 1251(a)(2)(C). Alaniz-Saenz

has not presented compelling evidence to the contrary. See INS

v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992); Chun v. INS, 40

F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). The BIA also implicitly determined

that the INS need not establish the type of handgun that AlanizSaenz was convicted of carrying in order to establish that he was

deportable under § 1251(a)(2)(C). The BIA’s interpretation of

§ 1251(a)(2)(C) is reasonable. See Iredia v. INS, 981 F.2d 847,

849 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 203 (1993). 

The petition for review is DENIED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ron MERTZ.

No. 87-KK-2638.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and remedial; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW87 0373; Parish of Lafayette, City Court of Lafayette, Div. “A”, No. DT-8600365.

Denied.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00603-CR

Antonio Hales, Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1319929R)

November 6, 2014

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**I-LINK INCORPORATED**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002(18 U.S.C. 1350)**

 

October 25, 2004

 

Theundersigned Allan Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of I-LinkIncorporated, a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection with theCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the annual period ended December31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.               The Report is in full compliance withreporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operation of the Corporation.

 

 

 

 

/s/ Allan Silber

 

 

 

Allan Silber

 

 

Chief Executive Officer
#### Vicki JOHNS, Widow and Surviving Spouse In Community of Jimmie D. Wallace, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Her Minor Sons, Matthew Kyle Wallace and Nick Andrew Wallace v. DEPARTMENT OF ROADS AND BRIDGES FOR the PARISH OF JEFFERSON, State of Louisiana, and South Central Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, and the Parish of Jefferson.

No. 87-C-0834.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Johns, Vicki; Wallace, Jimmie D.; Wallace, Matthew Kyle; Wallace, Nick Andrew; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-566; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 218-14.

Denied.
#### Roy L. THURMAN and Delores Thurman v. Mattie Mae WILLIAMSON.

No. 56865.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 4, 1987.

Lindia P. Robinson, Jackson, for appellant.

Merrida P. Coxwell, Jr., Stanfield, Cox-well & Carmody, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Simpson County; J.W. Walker, Chancellor.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WALKER, C.J., HAWKINS, P.J., and DAN M. LEE, PRATHER, SULLIVAN and GRIFFIN, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 27, 2018

No. 04-18-00189-CV

IN RE ASCENSION PROJECT, INC.,

AMK II Managing Member LLC, and AV Managing Member, LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On March 26, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for 

temporary relief pending mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The 

respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus 

in this court no later than April 12, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relators’ request for temporary relief is GRANTED. The trial court’s March 12, 2018 

‘Order” and the trial court’s March 21, 2018 “Order on Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, 

Ascension Project, Inc., AMK Managing Member, LLC and AV Managing Member, LLC’s 

Expedited Motion to Stay and Motion for Reconsideration” are both STAYED pending final 

resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED on March 27, 2018.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-07629, styled David Meaden v. Ascension Commercial Real 

Estate, L.P.; et al., pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica 

Jimenez presiding.
#### Billy SEWELL v. HANOVER INSURANCE CO., et al.

No. 88-C-0173.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Riddick, Winston W. — Other; Leake, Robert S. — Other; Riddick, Patricia T. — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1342; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 43213.

*148Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 413.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Edwin P. ROVIRA v. COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT.

No. 88-KH-2555.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Rovira, Edwin P.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, probation, mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 83-933; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KH-0626.

Denied.
PUBLIC HEARING 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY TEST PROCEDURES FOR COMMERCIAL FURNACES 

AND 

CERTIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES 

FOR HEATING, AIR CONDITIONING AND WATER HEATING EQUIPMENT 

Thursday, January 27,2000 

9:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. 

PURPOSE OF THE HEARING 

The purpose of this public hearing is to hear the views of interested persons on the 

proposed rules concerning test procedures for commercial haces, and certification and 

enforcement procedures for commercial heating, air conditioning and water heating equipment. 

The Department will consider the views presented and comments in formulating a final 

rulemaking. 

I. OPENING REMARKS AND INTRODUCTION (9:OO-9: 15AM) 

11. AGENDA REVIEW- (9: 15-9:25AM) 

111. BRIEF REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED RULE- (9:25-9:40AM) 

BREAK (1 5 Minutes) 

IV. TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION 

A. Test procedures for commercial hrnaces (955-12:OO NOON) 

B. Sampling, Certification and Enforcement Procedures for Commercial HVAC and 

Water Heating equipment (1 :30-3:30 PM) 

V. SUMMERY DISCUSSION AND ADJOURNMENT (3:30-5:00 PM) 

 EE-RM-TP-99-450 COMMENT 02BB

EE-RM/TP-99-450 COMMENT 02BB
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 358 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 358

Relative to the Death of Murray Zweben, Parliamentarian Emeritus of the 
                         United States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2000

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Relative to the Death of Murray Zweben, Parliamentarian Emeritus of the 
                         United States Senate.

Whereas Murray Zweben served the Senate with honor and distinction as its third 
        Parliamentarian from 1974 to 1981;
Whereas Murray Zweben was Assistant Senate Parliamentarian from 1963 to 1974;
Whereas Murray Zweben served the Senate for more than 20 years;
Wheras Murray Zweben performed his Senate duties in an impartial and 
        professional manner;
Whereas Murray Zweben was honored by the Senate with the title Parliamentarian 
        Emeritus; and
Whereas Murray Zweben served his country as an officer in the United States Navy 
        from 1953 to 1956: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound sorrow and deep 
regret the announcement of the death of the Honorable Murray Zweben, 
Parliamentarian Emeritus of the United States Senate; be it further
    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate communicate these 
resolutions to the House of Representatives and transmit an enrolled 
copy thereof to the family of the deceased; and be it further
    Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it stand adjourned 
as a further mark of respect to the memory of the Honorable Murray 
Zweben.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-09303, 33-61302 and 333-46585) pertaining to the 1988 Stock
Option Plan, the 1992 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the 1992 Directors' Stock
Option Plan, and the 1997 Stock Plan of ReSound Corporation and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-10189) of ReSound Corporation and
related Prospectus of our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of ReSound Corporation, included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1998
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 31, 2022 No. 04-21-00416-CV Kimi-Lyn MURRAY , Appellant

v. Phillip MURRAY , Appellee From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-19449 Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice On May 24, 2022, appellant filed her brief. Appellant’s brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 in that pages 38, 53, 59, 69, 111, and 115 of the brief include sensitive data, specifically the birth date and name of a person who was a minor when the underlying suit was filed, and such data has not been redacted. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 9.9. We therefore ORDER

that appellant’s brief is STRICKEN . We further ORDER appellant to file an amended appellant’s brief in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 by June 10, 2022.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 31st day of May, 2022___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification



I, Joseph Stein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph Stein            
|                        |  |  |  | Joseph Stein                
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President and Treasurer
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-31737 and No. 333-66305) on Form S-8 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.
and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 9, 2006 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.

LOGO

SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts

March 27, 2006

LOGO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

MICHAEL LEVANT JOHNSON, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

CHERYL KINNEY AND CHESTER 

COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, 

 Appellees 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 148 MAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 470 MD 2014

dated 10/27/14 and exited on 10/28/14 

 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM: DECIDED: June 15, 2015 

AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2015, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.
From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Shine, Brenda 

Cc: Lassiter, Penny; Johnson, Ann; Tierney, Jan 

Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 12:30 PM 

Subject: RE: RIN 2060-0146 Interagency comments under EO 13563 

Hi Brenda, 

Thanks for sending the revised version over. We don’t have any further questions. Can you send 

me a clean version? 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

202.395.7856