alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 305 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 305

           Commending participants in the Million Mom March.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2000

 Mr. Lautenberg submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Commending participants in the Million Mom March.

Whereas on Mother's Day--May 14, 2000--Americans from all walks of life will 
        unite for the Million Mom March on the National Mall in Washington, DC 
        and in communities across the country to call for meaningful, common 
        sense gun policy, and these families, citizens, members of religious 
        congregations, schools, community-based organizations, businesses, and 
        political and cultural groups will join together as a local and national 
        community to recognize the violence committed against our children from 
        guns;
Whereas 4,223 young people ages 19 and under were killed by gunfire--one every 
        two hours, nearly 12 young people every day--in the United States in 
        1997;
Whereas American children under 15 are 12 times more likely to die from gunfire 
        than children in 25 other industrialized countries combined;
Whereas the one year Anniversary of the Columbine High School tragedy passed on 
        April 20, 2000, without any action by Congress on the reasonable gun 
        safety measures that were sent to a House-Senate conference more than 
        nine months ago; and
Whereas protecting our children from gun violence is a top priority for our 
        families, communities, and Nation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the organizers, sponsors, and participants of the 
        Million Mom March shall be welcomed to Washington and commended 
        for rallying their communities to demand sensible gun safety 
        legislation; and
            (2) Congress should pass a conference report to accompany 
        H.R. 1501, the Violent and Repeat Juvenile Offender 
        Accountability and Rehabilitation Act before the Memorial Day 
        Recess, which includes the Lautenberg-Kerrey gun show loophole 
        amendment and the other Senate-passed provisions designed to 
        limit access to firearms by juveniles, convicted felons, and 
        other persons prohibited by law from purchasing or possessing 
        firearms.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 199

Designating the week of October 24, 1999, through October 30, 1999, and 
 the week of October 22, 2000, through October 28, 2000, as ``National 
              Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 1999

   Mr. Reed (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Reid, Mr. 
   Levin, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. 
 Sarbanes, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Chafee, 
Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Graham, 
 Mr. Durbin, Mr. DeWine, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
   Smith of Oregon, Mr. Robb, and Mr. Frist) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating the week of October 24, 1999, through October 30, 1999, and 
 the week of October 22, 2000, through October 28, 2000, as ``National 
              Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''.

Whereas lead poisoning is a leading environmental health hazard to children in 
        the United States;
Whereas according to the United States Center for Disease Control and 
        Prevention, 890,000 preschool children in the United States have harmful 
        levels of lead in their blood;
Whereas lead poisoning may cause serious, long-term harm to children, including 
        reduced intelligence and attention span, behavior problems, learning 
        disabilities, and impaired growth;
Whereas children from low-income families are 8 times more likely to be poisoned 
        by lead than those from high income families;
Whereas children may become poisoned by lead in water, soil, or consumable 
        products;
Whereas most children are poisoned in their homes through exposure to lead 
        particles when lead-based paint deteriorates or is disturbed during home 
        renovation and repainting; and
Whereas lead poisoning crosses all barriers of race, income, and geography: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
    (1) designates the week of October 24, 1999, through October 30, 
1999, and the week of October 22, 2000, through October 28, 2000, as 
``National Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week''; and
    (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon 
the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate 
programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sarah E. Palmer et al., as Executors of and Trustees under the Will of Henry U. Palmer, Deceased, et al., Appellants, *v.*The State of New York, Respondent.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 211 N. Y. 601.)
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

1.             I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)[Intentionally omitted];

c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

d)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: November 6,2006

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |
|                    |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                          

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1997 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND DEFICIT FOR YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,393
<PP&E>                                         461,854<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 278,550<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       192,845
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,621<F3>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   278,550<F4>
<SALES>                                         69,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,055
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,584<F5>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,160
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38
<FN>
<F1>The Company accounts for gas and oil properties in accordance with Canadian
guidelines on full cost accounting.
<F2>Deferred income taxes of $3,442 have been included in total assets.
<F3>Preferred shares of a subsidiary of $63,403, contributed surplus of $307, and
retained earnings (deficit) of $(7,089), have been combined in calculating
other stockholders' equity.
<F4>Deferred income taxes of $13,367 have been included in total liabilities and
stockholders' equity.
<F5>Direct expenses of $11,569, production taxes of $1,756, general and
administrative expenses of $4,308, and depletion and amortization of $36,951,
have been combined in calculating total cost.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### WHITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee.

No. 88-1101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 9, 1988.

*999Samantha Boge Cummings, of Cummings, Lawrence & Vezina, P.A., for appellant.

Maxine F. Ferguson and Thomas H. Bateman III, General Counsel, for appellee.

ON MOTION FOR STAY

PER CURIAM.

White Construction Company, Inc., has appealed an order issued by the Department of Transportation pursuant to Section 337.16(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1987), which suspended for four days White’s certificate of qualification to bid. Appellant seeks to stay that order, relying on section 120.68(3) which provides that when an order has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, a stay may be granted as a matter of right. White argues that the agency has announced its intention to find it delinquent on another project and such a finding would cause an automatic three-month suspension pursuant to section 337.16(l)(c).

Appellee has responded in opposition to the stay. First, appellee points out that section 337.167(1) expressly states that a certificate such as is involved in this case is not á license for purposes of Florida’s Administrative Procedure Act. Second, appel-lee argues that the potential three-month suspension for a “second offense” is speculative at this point and not adequate grounds for issuance of a stay.

We deny the motion to stay. Section 337.167(1) is somewhat ambiguous because in its first sentence it clearly states a certificate is not a license as defined in chapter 120. It then goes on in the second sentence, however, to state that “the denial or revocation, of a certificate is not subject to the provisions of ... § 120.68(3)” (the stay as a matter of right provision). In the instant case, the order on appeal is a suspension, not a denial or revocation. Whether the omission of “suspension” from the second sentence of section 337.167(1) was deliberate or inadvertent cannot be determined and we have found no case authority construing this statutory provision. Nevertheless, based on the first sentence of that subsection, it appears the “automatic” stay provisions of § 120.68(3) are inapplicable in this case and therefore appellant must otherwise show proper grounds for issuance of the stay. The motion is facially insufficient in that regard as there is no showing of appellant’s likelihood of prevailing on appeal, irreparable harm to movant if the motion is not granted, or showing that a stay would be in the public interest. *Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National Bank,*395 F.2d 685 (5th Cir.1968).

As to the issue of the potential for a three-month suspension if there is a “second offense”, if and when such an order is ever issued, appellant may then move to stay its enforcement.

Motion denied.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 256 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 9 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM Sheet 256 of 325P. 2 

### f 

# ^ ° o II-K-(I)-6 9
INDUSTRIAL BOILE R NSP S IMPAC T ANALYSI S - SEVENT H ROUND TES T CASES . EEA , Inc . Octobe r 8 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 9
#### Dr. Saundra M. HUNTER v. Joanne B. Whitney, Wife of/and David L. WHITNEY and Alarm Device Manufacturing Company (ADEMCO).

No. 88-C-0120.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Hunter, Saundra M. Dr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7261; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 83-18389.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1249.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: March 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Carmel Vernia
Carmel VerniaChief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 18.1



February 1, 2001



DQE, Inc.
Cherrington Corporate Center
400 Fairway Drive
Moon Township, Pennsylvania 15108

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of DQE, Inc. and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2000, included in your Annual Report on Form
10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report
thereon dated February 1, 2001, which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph concerning the change in accounting method to
record an estimate of unbilled revenues for electricity delivered but not yet
billed.  Note A to such financial statements contains a description of your
adoption during the year ended December 31, 2000 to record an estimate of
unbilled revenues for electricity delivered but not yet billed.  In our
judgment, such change is an alternative accounting principle that is preferable
under the circumstances.

Yours truly,



/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Thomas N. ChieffeThomas N. ChieffePresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) -34-
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19023]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Channels--Physiology and Signaling.
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Geoffrey G Schofield, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4040-A, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1235, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6007050f060612051913200313124e0e09084e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1374767c757561766a60537060613d7d7a7b3d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7579 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>