alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 41925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15299]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 228

[FRL-9948-49-Region 1]

Ocean Disposal; Proposed Designation of a Dredged Material 
Disposal Site in Eastern Region of Long Island Sound; Reopening of 
Public Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; reopening of the public comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today is reopening 
the public comment period on the proposed rule and Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement to designate one dredged material 
disposal site, the Eastern Long Island Sound Disposal Site (ELDS), 
located offshore from New London, Connecticut, for the disposal of 
dredged material from harbors and navigation channels in eastern Long 
Island Sound in the states of Connecticut and New York. The proposed 
rule published on April 27, 2016 (81 FR 24748). This action is 
necessary to provide a long-term, open-water dredged material disposal 
site as an alternative for the possible future disposal of such 
material.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to ELIS@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jean Brochi, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, 
Suite 100, Mail Code: OEP06-1, Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone: (617) 
918-1536, fax number: (617) 918-0536; email address: 
Brochi.Jean@epa.gov or ELIS@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Public Review of Documents: The file supporting this proposed 
designation is available for inspection at the following locations:
    In person. The Proposed Rule and the DSEIS, which includes the Site 
Management and Monitoring Plan (SMMP) for the ELDS, as well as the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers' Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) and 
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), are available for 
inspection at the EPA Region 1 Library, Five Post Office Square, 
Boston, MA, 02109.
    Electronically. You may also review and/or obtain electronic copies 
of these documents and various other supporting documents from EPA's 
Web site:https://www.epa.gov/ocean-dumping/dredged-material-management-long-island-sound.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228

    Environmental protection, Water pollution control.

    Dated: June 21, 2016.
H. Curtis Spalding,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1--New England.
[FR Doc. 2016-15299 Filed 6-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Federal Register: September 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 173)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 54497]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr08se10-10]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 81

[EPA-R03-OAR-2010-0431; FRL-9197-5]

 
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final 
rule to extend the attainment date from June 15, 2010 to June 15, 2011 
for the Baltimore nonattainment area, which is classified as moderate 
for the 1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard 
(NAAQS). In the direct final rule published on July 23, 2010, we stated 
that if we received any adverse comments by August 23, 2010, the rule 
would be withdrawn and would not take effect. EPA received an adverse 
comment within the comment period. EPA will address the comment 
received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action 
also published on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 43114). EPA will not institute a 
second comment period on this action.

DATES: Effective Date: The direct final rule is withdrawn as of 
September 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by 
e-mail at becoat.gregory@epa.gov.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, 
Wilderness areas.

    Dated: August 18, 2010.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
Accordingly, the amendments to Sec.  81.321, published in the direct 
final rule on July 23, 2010 (75 FR 43069), are withdrawn as of 
September 8, 2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-22344 Filed 9-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1567

ESTATE OF JERRY THEODORE MCCALLUP JR.; VERONICA MCCALLUP, 

DSC,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

ENVOY OF WILLIAMSBURG, and Affiliated Businesses; SCARLETT HUANG, 

Compliance Officer; BRIAN L. STEVENSON; ENVOY CORPORATE OFFICES; 

CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MARK 

R. HERRING, The State of Virginia Attorney General; ADAM KINSMAN, County 

Attorney for Williamsburg and James City County; COUNTY OF JAMES CITY 

COUNTY; COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY AND BOARD OF 

SUPERVISORS; CONSULATE HEALTH CARE; CIERA; BRITANY MOORE; 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION; 

ENVOY AFFILIATE CORPORATIONS; DEBORAH SHELTON AL-JARBOUA; 

JEREMY MCCALLUP; FAHAD AL-JARBOUA; JERRY THEO MCCALLUP; 

JUDGE WILLIAMSBURG; UNITED STATES ARMY FORT BRAGG; THE 

DOCTORS IN CHARGE OF CARE AND DOCTORS WHO CARED FOR MR. 

JERRY THEODORE MCCALLUP JR.; POLICE THAT TOOK MR. JERRY 

THEODORE MCCALLUP FROM HIS HOME; SHERIFFS JAMES CITY 

COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER; WILLIAMSBURG HUMAN SERVICES; 

WENDY EVANS; ANY AND ALL INSURANCE POLICIES OF PLAINTIFF 

JERRY THEODORE MCCALLUP JR.; JEREMY MCCALLUP’S WIFE; 

SENTARA HEALTHCARE; CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. David J. Novak, District Judge. (3:20-cv-00753-DJN)
2

Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 24, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Estate of Jerry Theodore McCallup, Jr.; Veronica McCallup, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Veronica McCallup appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to recuse

the district judge, which she filed after her underlying civil action had already been 

dismissed. Upon review of the record, we discern no abuse of discretion in the district 

court’s decision to deny the recusal motion. See Kolon Indus. Inc. v. E.I. DuPont de 

Nemours & Co., 748 F.3d 160, 167 (4th Cir. 2014) (stating standard of review). 

Accordingly, we deny McCallup’s motion to stay the proceedings and affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KYLE CHRISTIANSEN, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-1755

LT Case No. 2020-304419-CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed July 12, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Volusia County, 

Dennis Craig, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender,

and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and L. Charlene

Matthews, Assistant Attorney

General, Daytona Beach, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Eagle Ford Oil and Gas Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, N. Wilson Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 15, 2011








/s/ N. Wilson ThomasN. Wilson Thomas

Chief Financial Officer
#### ORLEANS BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Harrison RINEHART.

No. 87-CD-1443.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 17, 1987.

In re Rinehart, Harrison; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “J”, No. 86-18569.

Denied.
Exhibit
      32 .1








Certification
      Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
              September 28, 2007
            By:
            /s/
              JOHN
              R. DUNN IIJohn
              R. Dunn IICEO
              and President




EX-3
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18145-18146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-168745-03]


Guidance Regarding Deduction and Capitalization of Expenditures 
Related to Tangible Property; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correcting amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to a notice of proposed

[[Page 18146]]

rulemaking (REG-168745-03), which was published in the Federal Register 
relating to sections 162, and 263, providing guidance on the deduction 
and capitalization of expenditures related to tangible property.

DATES: Effective Date: March 27, 2012 and is applicable on or after 
December 27, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merrill Feldstein at (202) 622-4950, 
not a toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The notice of proposed rulemaking that is the subject of these 
corrections are under sections 162, 167, 168, and 263 of the Internal 
Revenue Code.

Need for Correction

    As published on December 27, 2011 (76 FR 81128), the notice of 
proposed rulemaking (REG-168745-03), contains errors which may prove to 
be misleading and are in need of clarification.

Correction of Publication

    Accordingly, the publication of the notice of proposed rulemaking 
(REG-168745-03), which were the subject of FR. Doc. 2011-32024, is 
corrected as follows:

List of Subjects in 26 CFR part 1

    Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is corrected my making the following 
correcting amendment:

PART 1--INCOME TAXES

    Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in 
part as follows:

    Authority:  26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *

    Par. 2. Section 1.162-3 is corrected to read as follows:


Sec.  1.162-3  [Corrected]


Sec.  1.162-3  Materials and supplies.

    [The text of the proposed amendments to Sec.  1.163-3 (a) through 
(j) is the same as the text of Sec.  1.163-3T(a) through (j) published 
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register.]

Guy R. Traynor,
Federal Register Liaison, Publications and Regulations, Legal 
Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-7267 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David O'Neill, Chief Financial Officer of Global Electronic Recovery Corp., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Electronic Recovery Corp.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

1. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

Page 1







5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 20, 2006

/s/ David O'Neill	David O'Neill
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

Page 2
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Douglas E. Nickerson, Chief Financial Officer of QC Holdings, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of QC Holdings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

 

b) [reserved]; and 

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Stereotaxis, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel J. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 6, 2011 |  | /s/ Daniel J. Johnston 
|                  |  | Daniel J. Johnston     
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  | Stereotaxis, Inc.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Claude STAMPLEY.

No. 87-KH-0227.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Stampley, Claude; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 309-456; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K 6859.

Denied. Moot.
Exhibit 32.1

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vector Intersect Security Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                |  |  |                 |  |  |                                                                               |
|--------------------------------|--|--|-----------------|--|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: June 11, 2007 |  |  | /s/ Yaron Eitan |
|                           |  |  | Name:           |  |  | Yaron Eitan                                                                   |
|                           |  |  | Title:          |  |  | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive, Accounting and Financial Officer |
|                                |

----