OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUAliTY STEVEN A: THOMPSON BRAD HENRY 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Governor Executive Director February 22,2008
Sinclair Oil Corporation Attn: Mr. SteveMoyer P.O. Box 970 Tulsa, OK 74101 Subject: Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Waiver TulsaRefinery DearMr. Moyer: The Oklahoma Department ofEnvironmentalQuality (ODEQ) received a.BART waiver request for the referenced site onDecember 5, 2006. After the technical review, the ODEQ is approving a waiver for the Tulsa Refinery. This

.waiver is based on facility BART sources which are not expected to cause or contribute

. to visibility impacts at Class I areas based on submitted modeling.

While ODEQ has approvedthe waiver, the waiver is subject to EPA andpublic comment during the Regional Haze State ImplementationProgram (SIP) approval**pro~ess.** Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 

### Ifwe may be offurther service, please contactPhillip Fielder (405)**702~4100.** 

# 71;
..**Dawso~~-""Jhi""'~-e-f-E-n-g~i~eer** AIR QUALITY DIVISION

707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA (llY, OKLAHOMA 73101-1677 printed on recycled paper with soy ink 

## oSinclair BART Sources

A. BART Sources and Emission Rates as detailed in the TitleV EUG9 Fuel.Burning Equipment Capacity Heater. Source UnitlPoint ID MMBTU ManufactUrer BumerType Dwg/Ser H StripperReboiler Hydrotreater-N/2458­ 120 ·SELAS JZ MA-18**A-Y-4~** 6156 Fractionator Hydrotreater-N/2458­ 65 SELAS JZMA-24**A-Y-4~** Reboiler 6156 Reactor Charge Hydrotreater-SI 2458­ 55 Foster-' JZ LOF-27-30 AV-Y-l 6157 Wheeler.

. SplitterReboiler CRU12458/6162 100 .SELAS 'JZMA-18 A-Y-L.

.Stabilizer Reboiler CRU12458/6162 75 SELAS JZMA-20**A-Y-4~**

CRU Charge CRU12458-6163 120 'SELAS JZMA-20**A-Y,.4~** Intermediate 1 CRU/2458-6163
. 101 SELAS Callidus CRG­ DB-4 LN-8P 3011: ,Intermediate 2 CRU12458-616J 25 SELAS JZMA-22**A..;Y-4~** EmIssion Emissions

factor Source Pollutant· LbIMMCF
. Lblht TPY "Hydro-stripper NOx 280 33 144

.'Hydrotreater, CO 84 10 44**N12458~6156** PM '7.6 ." ,0.9' 4.0 120MMBTUH S02 59 7 31 NMHC' 5.5 0;7 2.9 Hydro-fractionator NOx 100 6 28 ..•. Hydrotreater CO 84 5 23

.'N12458-6156 PM 7.6 0.5·'
.. 2.1

65MMBTUH S02 59 4· 16 NMHC 55 .. 0.4 1.5

. Hydro-reactor:charge NOx 100 5 24 .'Hydrotreater CO 84 5. 20

, S12458-6157 PM 7.6 0.4 1.8 S02 59 0.4 1.8 NMHC 5.5 0.3 1.3 CRU-reboilers NOx 280 48 210 SplitterlStabilizer CO 84 14 63 CRU12458/6162 PM 7.6 1.3 5.7 100MMBTUH S02 59' 10 44Emission Emissions factor Source Pollutant LblMMCF Lblhr TPY / 75MMBTUH NMHC 5.5 0.9 4.1 CRU-charge NOx 280 33 144 CRU 2458-6163 CO 84 lO 43 120MMBTUH 

### PM 7.6 0.9 3.9 S02 59 7 30 NMHC 5.5 0.6 2.8 CRU-intermediate 1 NOx 280 28 121 CRU 2458-6163 CQ 84 8 36 101 MMBTUH 

### PM 7.6 0.8 3.3 S02 59 6 26 NMHC 5.5 0.5 2.4

.CRU.;.intermediaie 2 NOx 100**2~5** lO.7 CRU 2458-6163 CO 84 2.1 9.0 25MMBTUH· 

### PM 7.6 0.2 0.8 S02 59 1.4
. 6.3 NMHC 0.1 0.6


### EUGIO Sulfur Recovery Unit

.Scrubbed tail gas exhausts at 3,600 ACFM and 340°F through a 2' diameter stack at 200'.

abovegrade; The unit was constructed in 1972. The refinery used an emission factor of278 pounds of S02 per ton ofsulfur produced, taken from Table 8.13':1 ofAP-42 (1195), coupled with 

## a scrubber .efficiency of98.5%. Assuming 8760 hours ofproduction at a rate of 18 tons per day yields 18 TPD x 365 days/year x 

### 278lb/ton x (1 0.985) x ton/2000lb = 13.70 TPY or 3.13lblhr.


### EUG12 Flares The #2 flare tip was designed for smokeless operation at 120,000 lblhr of 87 average molecular weight gas and 42,000 lblhr ofsteam and has a maximum capacity of352,600 lblhr of67.8 average molecular weight gas. Both flare tips have a diameter of5'.
Flare MakelModel Height (ft) Date #2 ZinklSTF-SA-36-C 250
. 1972 Emission factor Emissions Pollutant Lb/1000barrels TPY: ,,',. " ' PM 10 Negligible -0­ NOx 18.9 208.85 CO 4.3 ' 47.52 S02, 26.9 606.16* VOC 0.8 8.84
EUG19 Cooling Towers Cooling towers are considered to be trivial sources for Title V purposes; so the following

,table is shownonly for the sake of**completeness~** Number Purpose Date 8 Cooling waterfor the 0 IF 1972

. ' Cooling towers are considered to be trivial sources for Title V purposes, because
. particulate emissions are .larger than 30 microns. 'Entrained VOCs and chlorine are inc1uded'inthe tables for EUG 16 above, inthe row titled "Water." Calculation ofVOC is based .on factors found in Table 5.1-2 of AP-42 (1/95), using a circulation rate of 89,940 gpm. Chlorine has a concentration of 7 ppm and drift is assumed to be 1.7 Ib/1000 gal in this induced draft system. '. B. EmissionRates ReviewlApproval

EU Point ID
. NOx PMio Sox PPH Approved PPH Approved PPH Approved Hydrotreat • Nr2458/6156 39.31 I 2.04 2 ,8.25 3 er-N . (1.4) (II) Hydrotreat S/2458-6157 5.39 2 0.43 I 2.45 2 er-S (5) (0.4) ,(0.4) Splitter­ CRU/2458/6162 34.80 3 1.51 2 7.80 3 StabilizeF (48:0) (1.3) Reformer CRUl2458-6163 63:12 1 5.37 2 10.97 3 & (1.9) (14.4) Intermedia te-l&2 SRU. 6152 '

## -­ -­ 

### -­ 3.55 2 (3.13) Flare No. 6154 ·55.35 2 

## -­ -­ 299.22 2 2 (47.68) (138.4) Cooling CT-8 

## -­ -­ 25:54 I,',
. 4, 

## -­ .

### -­ Tower 

# omdicates vahle fromTItle V perrmt 1 - used maximumJ-hremission rate as calculatediri existing permit memorandum 2 - exceeds TV emissionrate in memo , , , 3 - less than TV emission**r~tein** memo, however, basedon inventorydata is conservative estimate of maximum24-houraverage 4 ­ no TV emissions.calculated, trivialSummary Based on estimated impacts, the discrepancies in emissions rates are not ofconcern based on the estimated Class I area impacts.
. --:.,