alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-826V 

Filed: December 15, 2015 

Unpublished 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

MARY PONSNESS, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccination; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner. 

Lara Ann Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On August 3, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National 

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 [the “Vaccine 

Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that she suffered shoulder injuries as a result of 

her January 11, 2013 influenza [“flu”] vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned 

to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On December 14, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “opines that petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA)” and that 

“petitioner’s SIRVA was caused-in-fact by the flu vaccination she received on January 

11, 2013.” Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “based on the current record, 

petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act.” Id.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended 

at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 10.3


 


Tri-S Security Corporation


3700 Mansell Road


Suite 220


Alpharetta, GA 30022


 


August 10, 2005


 


Mr. Ronald Farrell


3700 Mansell Road


Suite 220


Alpharetta, Georgia 30022


 


Dear Mr. Farrell:


 


This letter,
when countersigned by you, will set forth the entire agreement between you and
Tri-S Security Corporation (the “Company”) regarding the subject matter hereof.


 


You and the
Company agree, acknowledge and understand that the Amendment No. 1 to
Employment Agreement between the Company and you dated February 4, 2005
(the “Amendment”) is rescinded effective July 19, 2005 and that your
employment with the Company is governed by that certain Employment Agreement
between the Company and you dated January 1, 2002 as if the Amendment were
never in effect (the “Rescission”).  The
Company acknowledges that the Rescission was approved by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company on July 19, 2005.


 


This letter may be executed by facsimile signature and in one or more
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


If the
foregoing accurately reflects our agreement, please execute this letter in the
space below and return a copy to the Company.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  TRI-S SECURITY CORPORATION

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Wayne Stallings

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Printed Name: Wayne Stallings

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Chief Financial Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Ronald G. Farrell

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  RONALD G. FARRELL
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND
, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In re The State of Texas

, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11

- 14

- 00011

- CR * January 16, 2014

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has considered the State of Texas’s motion to dismiss his application
for emergency stay and writ of mandamus relating to trial court cause nos. 13

- 43 47,

13

- 4370, and 13

- 4373 and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in

accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the proceeding is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The undersigned, the Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: July 22, 2011



/s/ Jiangping JiangJiangping JiangChairwoman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   Consent of Independent Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
SAFLINK Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-54084, 333-75789, 333-58575, 333-23467, 333-01510, and 33-62430) on Form S-3
and (No. 333-74253) on Form S-8 of SAFLINK Corporation of our report dated April
13, 2001, except as to notes 12, 13 and 14 which are as of June 18, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of SAFLINK Corporation and subsidiary
as of December 31, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for the year then ended, which report appears in Amendment No. 3 of the December
31, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K/A of SAFLINK Corporation.

In our report dated April 13, 2001 we did not express an opinion on the 2000
consolidated financial statements due to material uncertainties relating to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  As disclosed in the
consolidated financial statements in note 13, the Company has received financing
proceeds subsequent to December 31, 2000.  Accordingly, our present opinion on
the consolidated financial statements as presented herein, is different from our
previous report.

Our report dated April 13, 2001, except as to notes 12, 13 and 14 which are as
of June 18, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company
has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a working capital deficit
that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Seattle, Washington
June 20, 2001
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, D. Keith LaVanway, Vice President-Finance; Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Treasurer and
Assistant Secretary, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 17, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ D. Keith LaVanwayD. Keith LaVanway  Vice
President  Finance,  Chief
Financial Officer,  Treasurer
and Secretary  (Principal
Financial Officer and  Principal
Accounting Officer)
 -25-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Sandra D. Anderson, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer), of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


Date:   August 16, 2006


                                             /s/ Sandra D. Anderson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Sandra D. Anderson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                             Officer)
III

Calendar No. 226

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 160

To restore enforcement of rule 16.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 22, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was ordered to be placed

on the calendar

RESOLUTION

To restore enforcement of rule 16.

1 Resolved, That the presiding officer of the Senate

2 should apply all precedents of the Senate under rule 16,

3 in effect at the conclusion of the 103d Congress.
Calendar No. 226

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 160

RESOLUTION

To restore enforcement of rule 16.

JULY 22, 1999

Ordered to be placed on the calendar
exv10w47



 






Exhibit 10.47




ADDENDUM FOUR

TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT




     This ADDENDUM FOUR TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A GAMMA KNIFE UNIT (this “Addendum”) is effective as
of December 1, 2002 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, a California Corporation
(“Hospital”), and GK Financing, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GKF”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, on October 31, 1996, GKF and Hospital executed a Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife
Unit (the “Original Lease”);



     WHEREAS, the parties executed and Addendum Three to Lease Agreement For A Gamma Knife Unit
(“Addendum Three”) which was effective through November 30, 2002;



     WHEREAS, at the expiration of Addendum Three on November 30, 2002, the parties intended to
extend the terms and provisions of Addendum Three for an additional three-year period from December
1, 2002 through November 30, 2005, but inadvertently neglected to execute a document memorializing
the same; and



     WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Addendum in order to memorialize their
agreement on December 1, 2002 to extend the terms and provisions of Addendum Three as described
above.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



AGREEMENT




     1. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein shall
have the same meaning set forth in the Original Lease.



     2. Addendum Extension. All of the terms and provisions of Addendum Three are hereby extended
and shall remain in effect for an additional three (3) year period commencing from December 1, 2002
through November 30, 2005.



     3. Full Force and Effect. Except as otherwise amended hereby or provided herein, all of the
terms and provisions of the Original Lease shall remain in full force and effect.



[Signatures continued on next page]




 









 







[Signature page to Addendum Four To Lease Agreement For A Gamma Knife Unit dated effective as of
December 1, 2002 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC.]




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum effective as of the date first
written above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	“HOSPITAL”	 	Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BY:	 	/s/ Robert Braithwaite
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Name:
	 	Robert Braithwaite
	 

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	VP, Operations
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	“GKF”	 	GK Financing, LLC
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BY:	 	/s/ Craig K. Tagawa
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Craig K. Tagawa
	 	 	 	 	Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

JAMAL JONES, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff Below, 

Appellee. 

§ 

§ No. 334, 2018 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. K1707019429 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: October 1, 2018 

 Decided: October 5, 2018 

ORDER 

It appears to the Court that, on September 19, 2018, the Chief Deputy 

Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not 

be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix. The 

appellant failed to file a response within the ten-day time period; therefore, 

dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme 

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

Justice
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Ibanez as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Manuel L. Ibanez of Texas on 
May 4, 2000, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term 
of 6 years. The reappointment shall take effect on May 5, 2000.

            Passed the Senate April 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Ibanez as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
Order entered February 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01207-CV

LORENA GOMEZ DE GONZALEZ BARRERA A/K/A LORENA TASSINARI 

GONZALEZ BARRERA, Appellant

V.

EDUARDO LIVAS-CANTU, JUAN ANTONIO QUIROGA-GARCIA, JUAN 

GONZALEZ MORENO, GRUPO FINANCIERO BANORTE SAB DE CV, DOING 

BUSINESS AS INTER NATIONAL BANK IN THE STATE OF TEXAS., Appellees

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-15-02808-1

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 14, 2020 motion for a fourteen-day extension of 

time to file her brief. We GRANT the motion. Appellant’s brief shall be filed by March 2, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 10.1(b)


Schedule of Secured Convertible Notes (new financings) issued by NCT Group, Inc.
              to Carole Salkind and Outstanding as of June 30, 2005



                                                                Conversion
   Issue Date         Due Date             Principal               Price
   ----------         --------          --------------             -----
    12/17/04          06/17/05           $   400,000              $0.0166
    12/31/04          06/30/05               400,000              $0.0180
    01/26/05          07/26/05               400,000              $0.0172
    02/09/05          08/09/05               400,000              $0.0180
    02/16/05          08/16/05               400,000              $0.0184
    03/08/05          09/08/05               390,000              $0.0180
    03/29/05          09/29/05               390,000              $0.0180
    04/14/05          10/14/05               390,000              $0.0130
    04/26/05          10/26/05               390,000              $0.0110
    05/16/05          11/16/05               350,000              $0.0123
    06/10/05          12/10/05               350,000              $0.0100
    06/24/05          12/24/05               576,000              $0.0160
                                     -------------------
                                         $ 4,836,000
                                     ===================
#### Louis Underwood THOMPSON v. Mary Penelope Murray THOMPSON.

No. 56195.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

March 4, 1987.

Frank T. Moore, Jr., Richard A. Montague, Jr., Wells, Moore, Simmons & Stub-blefield, Jackson, for appellant.

S. Robert Hammond, Jr., Bryant, Stennis & Colingo, Hattiesburg, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Forrest County; Wm. Robert Taylor, Chancellor.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and ANDERSON, JJ.

Affirmed.

HAWKINS, P.J., and DAN M. LEE, PRATHER, SULLIVAN, and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

WALKER, C.J., not participating.
#### Leland F. Mattison, Plaintiff, *v.*Park Motor Sales, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 16, 1959.

*281
      *Hughes, Hubbard, Blair & Reed*for Ford Motor Company, defendant.

*Abraham Ellis*for plaintiff.

*Daniel Rosen*for Park Motor Sales, Inc., defendant.

Samuel H. Hoestadter, J.

Defendant Ford Motor Company moves for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice. In the single cause asserted against movant, the plaintiff alleges that it delivered to a dealer in February, 1956 a Mark II Continental Coupe bearing a stated serial number; that thereafter defendant issued a “ Manufacturer’s Statement of Origin ”, representing the vehicle was a new 1957 Mark II Continental Coupe and bearing the stated serial number, and that it was delivered to the dealer in December, 1956. It is further alleged that the defendant knew or had reason to believe that the representation made by said statement would he relied upon by any subsequent purchaser, that in fact the vehicle was a 1956 Mark II Continental Coupe and had been shipped and received in February, 1956, and that by reason of the negligence the codefendant was unable to represent to the plaintiff that the vehicle was a new 1957 car.

Plaintiff disavows any representation made directly to him. Consequently, he must allege that the claimed negligent representation contained in the statement contributed to the warranty and representation made to him by the dealer and that he relied on that statement.

Plaintiff urges that the defendant knew or should have known that its statement would be used by the dealer to substantiate its representation, hut there is no such allegation. While, as argued, “ A misrepresentation of fact or law may he negligent conduct ” (2 Restatement, Torts, § 304), it remains necessary to allege the causal relation between the negligence and the *282damage. Clearly, the dealer was not misled by the statement. For aught that appears, its misrepresentation and the plaintiff’s reliance thereon are in no wise connected with the statement and, acording to the allegation, the dealer was unable to and did make its representation entirely without relation to the statement. It is unnecessary to consider whether the damage as stated is recoverable.

The motion is granted, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 20 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 16

- 00461

- CR
Andrey Cardiel Martinez

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 1486

- 16

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinio n

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 27 , 2017