alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rotoblock
Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Howard, Chief
Financial and Principal Accounting Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  September 14, 2005      /s/ Thomas M. Howard
                               --------------------------------------
                               By: Thomas M. Howard,
                               Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer,
                               Prinicipal Accounting Officer and
                               Director










<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Frontier Media, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Karyn L. Miller, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/ Karyn L. Miller
------------------------------------
Karyn L. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
DATED: June 14, 2004
(i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: April 30, 2009
    /s/ ALAN D. GOLDAlan D. GoldChief Executive Officer    (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: April 30, 2009
    /s/ KENT GRIFFINKent GriffinChief Financial Officer
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 67

To authorize the printing of ‘‘The United States Capitol: A Chronicle of

Construction, Design, and Politics’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of ‘‘The United States Capitol:

A Chronicle of Construction, Design, and Politics’’.

Whereas the 200th anniversary of the establishment of the

seat of government in the District of Columbia will be observed in the year 2000;

Whereas November 17, 2000, will mark the bicentennial of

the occupation of the United States Capitol by the Senate

and the House of Representatives; and

Whereas the story of the design and construction of the

United States Capitol deserves wider attention: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),
2

•SCON 67 ATS

1 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF ‘‘THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL: A

2 CHRONICLE OF CONSTRUCTION, DESIGN,

3 AND POLITICS’’.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be printed as a Senate

5 document the book entitled ‘‘The United States Capitol:

6 A Chronicle of Construction, Design, and Politics’’, pre7 pared by the Architect of the Capitol.

8 (b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Senate document de9 scribed in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and

10 shall be in the style, form, manner, and binding as di11 rected by the Joint Committee on Printing after consulta12 tion with the Secretary of the Senate.

13 (c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

14 number of copies, there shall be printed with suitable bind15 ing the lesser of—

16 (1) 6,500 copies for the use of the Senate, the

17 House of Representatives, and the Architect of the

18 Capitol, to be allocated as determined by the Sec19 retary of the Senate; or

20 (2) a number of copies that does not have a

21 total production and printing cost of more than

22 $143,000.

Æ
# Official Journal C 50/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 50 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6313 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 50

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6313 February 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| 2020/C 50/01 | Commission Decision of 13 December 2019 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, France, Italy, Lithuania, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom into the European Union Transaction Log | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

2020/C 50/01

Commission Decision of 13 December 2019 instructing the Central Administrator of the European Union Transaction Log to enter changes to the national allocation tables of Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Greece, France, Italy, Lithuania, Hungary, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Sweden and the United Kingdom into the European Union Transaction Log

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### George M. Freybergh, Doing Business as Belmonte Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Jack Geliebter et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Jack Gell & Company, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 4, 1959.

*Stroock £ Stroock £ Lavan (Martin E. Eile*and *Leonard A. Fink*of counsel), for defendants appearing specially.

*Martin Selig*for plaintiff.

Aron Stbuer, J.

Motion to set aside service of a summons on the ground that defendant was enticed into coming into the jurisdiction for the purpose of service. The defendant who lives in Detroit was in dispute, with plaintiff who lives in New York. Defendant saw what he thought was a way of resolving the suit and he suggested a conference in New York. Both parties had long since retained attorneys .and the attorneys had correspondence in relation to the conference. Plaintiff’s attorney wrote that he was agreeable to the conference but that if it did not result in a satisfactory settlement he would sue. *622He also stated that he had instructed local counsel in Detroit to delay institution of suit until after the conference. The conference was held, was unproductive of result and plaintiff thereupon served the defendant.

In no decided case has a defendant who suggested of his own volition that he come into the jurisdiction been successful on this type of motion. It is this defendant’s contention that the correspondence referred to lulled him into a sense of security. It is pure matter of definition that one is not enticed to do what one, himself, suggests. If defendant wishes to establish that without the so-called assurances given he would not have acted on his own suggestion, his proof falls short. He made no conditions. He merely asked in effect if the plaintiff would confer with him. When told he would, he came. This is not enticement and the motion must fail.

Motion denied.
; l.ewvlu~ 

1 vw• `!'v ~e; ~ ~j,~trE~~~r~ `~IC~' o 

F1 

ve.7 

R G~ d/IiG GL 

a V/ / 

Y/alLc/ ~ e 

~ ~~ 

50 

3e 0, 
74~u' J~ 

393, 

IV 14 

-7 A-ay 3 

'962. CC 

/v 

A,~ 

l 

7t~ 'v 

C-to 

ol 

iald 

XTIQ) 6 
C' 6it-p )j 4-A F IA 

To d-xL-c-Quwp-,

-a/"-" 

u- VJ a4~- , ~ 

IU42-Ccu) eXL 

(Dua ~~-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          135500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                135500
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  135500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25375
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7765
<OTHER-SE>                                      202507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    135500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                100147
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (100147)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (100147)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.295)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32: Certificate pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of China YCT International Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September  8, 2011
/s/ Yan TingheYan Tinghe, Chief Executive OfficerSeptember  8, 2011
/s/ Li ChuanminLi Chuanmin, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Stephen W. Ensign, is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of New Hampshire Thrift
Bancshares, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. Pursuant to Securities and
Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by
reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                     |  |  |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 25, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Stephen W. Ensign               
|                     |  |  |  | Stephen W. Ensign                   
|                     |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
May 25, 2012

Ms. Colleen Gillespie

Chief Wastewater Permitting Unit

U.S. EPA, Region VIII 

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-8917

Re: Section 401 Water Quality Certification for Proposed 2013 Vessel General Permit (s)

Dear Ms. Gillespie:

This letter is intended to clarify the water quality certification issued May 10, 2012 for EPA’s vessel 

general permit. That certification applies to both the Vessel General Permit and the Small Vessel 

General Permit. 

If you have any questions, please give me a call at 303-692-3599

Sincerely,

Janet Kieler

Permits Section Manager

Cc: File : 401 Certifications – Federal Facilities – Vessel General Permit
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONBY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

1.             I havereviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

2.             Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date: August 04,2006
|                    |
|-------------------------|
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |
|                    |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

SEAN RODNEY ORTH, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK, 

Respondent, 

and 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Real Party in Interest. 

No. 84180 

FILE 

APR 1 4 20n 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK9f SUPREME COURT 

By 

DEPUTY CLERK 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR 

A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges actions 

of the district court in continuing petitioner's preliminary hearing, denying 

petitioner's motion to suppress evidence, and violating double jeopardy. 

Petitioner also alleges the State manipulated the suppression proceedings 

by withholding material information. 

This court has original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, 

and the issuance of such extraordinary relief is within this court's sole 

discretion. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4; D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner 

bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan 

v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). 

A writ of mandamus is not available when the petitioner has a plain, 

speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. Williams v. 

Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 518, 524, 262 P.3d 360, 364 (2011); 

see also Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. The opportunity to appeal a 

final judgment typically provides an adequate legal renaedy. Williams 127 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 447A se*. -I! , 
"egi)C.1-.0 , J. 

Hardesty Stiglich 

J. 

Nev. at 524, 262 P.3d at 364 (2011); see also Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d 

at 844 ([An] appeal is generally an adequate remedy precluding writ 

relief.") Even when an appeal is not immediately available because the 

challenged order is interlocutory in nature, the fact that the order may 

ultimately be challenged on appeal from a final judgment generally 

precludes writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 225, 88 P.3d at 841. Having 

considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary 

intervention is warranted because petitioner has not demonstrated that an 

appeal from a final judgment below would not be a plain, speedy, and 

adequate legal remedy. 

Additionally, we note that petitioner has not provided this court 

with all the necessary exhibits or documentation that would support his 

claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit 

an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters 

set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the 

claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. 

See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

OM 1947A oCilDico 

2 
cc: Sean Rodney Orth 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A .6i2N0 

3
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wilbert STEVENSON.

No. 87-K-2578.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Stevenson, Wilbert; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition and mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18977-KA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 43290.

Prior report: La.App., 514 So.2d 651.

Denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, John R. Strangefeld, Chief Executive Officer of The PrudentialInsurance Company of America, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2007, containing the financial statements of The Prudential VariableContract Real Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance Company of America)and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the “Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account andThe Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.       Date: March 21, 2008