alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 202 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 202

  Recognizing the distinguished service of John E. Cook of Williams, 
                                Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 13, 1999

  Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the distinguished service of John E. Cook of Williams, 
                                Arizona.

Whereas John E. Cook has recently retired from the National Park Service after 
        43 years of distinguished service to the United States and the people of 
        the western region of the Nation;
Whereas John E. Cook most recently served 87 park units in 8 western States, 
        stretching from the Canadian border to Mexico, as Director of the 
        Intermountain Region of the National Park Service;
Whereas John E. Cook is in the third of 4 generations from the Cook family who 
        have served the National Park Service with enthusiasm and dedication;
Whereas John E. Cook's father, John O. Cook, and his grandfather, John E. Cook, 
        served the National Park Service in the southwestern region, and his 
        daughter Kayci Cook, currently serves as superintendent of Fort McHenry 
        National Monument and Historic Shrine in Baltimore;
Whereas John E. Cook began his National Park Service career as a mule skinner at 
        what is now Saguaro National Park;
Whereas John E. Cook, who is of Cherokee descent, speaks Navajo, and has worked 
        diligently to promote Native American understanding;
Whereas John E. Cook has held 4 regional directorships, 1 deputy regional 
        directorship, and 5 superintendencies within the National Park Service, 
        and has proven to be a strong manager of people and parks, linking 
        cultural and natural resource management; and
Whereas the citizens of the United States and the National Park Service owe John 
        E. Cook a debt of gratitude and wish to congratulate him on his well-
        deserved retirement: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) congratulates John E. Cook for 43 years of service to 
        the National Park Service;
            (2) acknowledges the admiration and affection that John E. 
        Cook's friends share for him; and
            (3) recognizes the pride and high standard of workmanship 
        exhibited by John E. Cook for 43 years.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Ming Hsieh, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cogent, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Dated: May 10, 2006                  
|                                     
|/s/    MING HSIEH                    
|Ming Hsieh                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,584,360
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  129,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,698,745
<PP&E>                                       8,836,626
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,893,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,642,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,191
<BONDS>                                        329,370
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,124,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,642,076
<SALES>                                      2,994,157
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,818,337
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,417,139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,188
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,350,0110
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,350,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,350,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                     National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; ZHD1 DSR-K LR 1.                

*Date:*                     April 16, 2012.                

*Time:*                     8 a.m. to 12 p.m.                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate grant applications.                

*Place:*                     National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                

*Contact Person:*                     Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                     *skandasa@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 19, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-7092 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### UTILITY OPERATORS, INC. v. Ram S. RATAN.

No. 86-C-2527.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Utility Operators, Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA-85-1488; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 285684.

Prior report: La.App., 493 So.2d 925.

Denied.

CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C 1350)





Each of the undersigned officers of Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.By:
/s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
Christopher H. ColeTitle:
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Director (Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Date:
May 10, 2011

Title:
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director (Principal Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 12, 2008
    /s/  Michael H. LeeMichael H. LeePresident and Chief Executive Officer May 12, 2008
    /s/  Francis M. ColalucciFrancis M. ColalucciSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 34
#### STATE ex rel. Danman MARSHALL v. Hon. Robert W. KOSTELKA, Judge, 4th Judicial District Court, Parish of Ouachita, State of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-0130.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Marshall, Danman; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Oua-chita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 39630.

Denied. No particularized need shown.
#### Edith Reed Keyworth, Wife of/and Charles L. KEYWORTH v. SOUTHERN BAPTIST HOSPITALS, INC. a/k/a Southern Baptist Hospital.

No. 88-C-1081.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Green, Doug, La. Comr./Ins.; Louisiana Patient’s Comp. Fund; applying for *1062writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7622; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 83-4061.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 56.

Denied.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification



I, Joseph Stein, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of El Pollo Loco, Inc. (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Joseph Stein    
|                        |  |  |  | Joseph Stein           
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer



2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-60906

CHARLES DIXON, Individually and on behalf of the 345 other named 

plaintiffs; AMELIA WAY, Individually and on behalf of the 345 other named 

plaintiffs; SHEILA GARY EVANS, Individually and on behalf of the 345 other 

named plaintiffs; CICILIA JEFFERSON, Individually and on behalf of the 345 

other named plaintiffs, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

RICHARD A. FREESE; TIM K. GOSS; FREESE & GOSS, P.L.L.C.; JOHN 

AND JANE DOES, Individually and as Entities, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:13-CV-236

Before JONES, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and 

record. Having done so, we conclude that there is neither clear error nor any 

reversible error of law in the district court’s decision that the admission of a 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 14, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-60906 Document: 00513192025 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/14/2015
No. 14-60906

2

non-equity member by the unanimous agreement of the LLC’s equity members 

occurred substantially in accordance with Texas law. See Tex. Bus. Org. Code 

§§ 101.001(1) (“company agreement” defined to include written or oral 

agreements), 101.053 (each member must consent to an amendment of the 

company agreement, 101.103(c) (a non-equity member may be admitted on 

consent of all the company members); 101.102(c) (the company agreement may 

provide for admission of non-equity members), and 101.104(b) (rights of a class 

of members may be stated in the company agreement or at the time the class 

is established). Accordingly, we AFFIRM, for essentially the reasons stated 

by the trial court, its decision to dismiss the case for lack of federal jurisdiction.

 Case: 14-60906 Document: 00513192025 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/14/2015
Page 1

Notes from Call with Vectren Corporation on January 21, 2014

On Tuesday, January 21, 2014, ERG contacted the Vectren Corporation to discuss what appeared 

to be a discrepancy between information provided regarding the questionnaire responses for the A.B. 

Brown Station (Plant ID 8502) and the Vectren Corporation’s comments on the proposed steam electric 

effluent limitations guidelines and standards (ELGs) (EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819-4317-A1). In the 

questionnaire responses, the company noted that the A.B. Brown Station had a flue gas desulfurization 

(FGD) wastewater flow rate of 1.242 MGD coming from the truck bay wash and the belt filter wash area. 

However, in the company’s comments on the proposed ELGs, the company stated that the plant did not 

discharge any FGD wastewater. ERG asked Lisa Messinger, the primary technical contact for the 

questionnaire, about this discrepancy. Ms. Messinger provided ERG with the following information:

The FGD wastewater generated from the truck bay wash area and the belt filter 

wash area are transferred to the ash pond. The plant recirculates ash pond water for 

use in various plant processes, including the FGD thickener tank, belt filter wash waters, 

bottom ash sluice water, and general plant wash down hoses such as those used in the 

FGD truck loading area. During normal operation, all ash pond water is reused at the 

plant; it is only necessary to discharge from the ash pond following or in preparation for 

heavy or prolonged precipitation events. In terms of the large flow rate for the belt 

filter wash water, the plant continually washes the underside of the belt filter with fire 

hoses using ash pond water as the source of the wash water. This operation results in a 

large volume of water that is transferred to the ash pond but is ultimately returned to 

the FGD system for use as belt filter wash water. 

Ms. Messinger provided ERG with additional information regarding the FGD wastewater flow 

rates via email after the call. See Appendices A through D of these notes for the additional information 

provided. Based on the information provided, ERG determined that the A.B. Brown plant does not 

discharge FGD wastewater to surface water.
#### Jerry Wayne BROOKS v. STATE.

6 Div. 264.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

June 9, 1987.

*260Jerry Wayne Brooks, pro se.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and James B. Prude, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

TAYLOR, Judge.

Jerry Wayne Brooks, incarcerated at the West Jefferson Correctional Facility, filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis. That petition was denied and Brooks appeals.

Brooks had pleaded guilty to the offense of attempting to discharge a pistol into an occupied dwelling. He was sentenced as a recidivist to fifteen years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. During the proceeding, he admitted to his prior felony convictions. Brooks’s contention on appeal is that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective because counsel did not tell him that if he did not admit to his prior felonies, then the state would have to prove them. His position is that at the moment he admitted to the prior felony convictions, his counsel was guilty of ineffective assistance. We disagree.

A defendant’s admission of a pri- or felony is a proper method of proving that prior conviction for purposes of the Habitual Felony Offender Act. *Faircloth v. State,*471 So.2d 485 (Ala.Cr.App.1984). It is never the responsibility of defense counsel to tell his client to lie. The contention made by this coram nobis petitioner, who admitted to his prior felony convictions, is subject to a fatal flaw. For ineffective assistance of counsel to meet the test of *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), “the defendant must show that a deficient performance prejudiced the defense.” There is no showing in this case that the prosecutor could not have proved the prior convictions by other evidence. For that reason, there is no showing that the petitioner’s admission of his prior felony convictions actually prejudiced his case. Without such proof, the *Strickland v. Washington*test is not met and the assistance rendered by counsel is not shown to be ineffective. We do not mean to suggest, however, that there was initial error committed by counsel.

This case is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All the Judges concur.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 1034 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM051AD

A320 - 55 - 1035 --- 2/17/10 A320 - 55 - 1036 --- 2/17/10 A320 - 55 - 1037 --- 2/17/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of the
Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ Matthew L. Schissler
------------------------
Matthew L. Schissler
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

                                       54