alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 77

Making technical corrections to the enrollment of H.R. 3194

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Making technical corrections to the enrollment of H.R. 3194

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3194), making

4 appropriations for the government of the District of Co5 lumbia and other activities chargeable in whole or in part

6 against revenues of said District for the fiscal year ending

7 September 30, 2000, and for other purposes, shall make

8 the following correction:

9 At the appropriate place of the bill insert the following:
2

SCON 77 ATS

1 COMMODITY CREDIT CORPORATION

2 PRODUCER-OWNED MARKETING ASSOCIATIONS

3 FORGIVENESS

4 SECTION 1. The Secretary of Agriculture shall reduce

5 the amount of any principal due on a loan made to mar6 keting association incorporated in the State of North

7 Carolina for the 1999 crop of an agricultural commodity

8 by at least 75 percent if the marketing association suf9 fered losses of the agricultural commodity in a county with

10 respect to which—

11 (1) a natural disaster was declared by the Sec12 retary for losses due to Hurricane Dennis, Floyd, or

13 Irene; or

14 (2) a major disaster or emergency was declared

15 by the President for losses due to Hurricane Dennis,

16 Floyd, or Irene under the Robert T. Stafford Dis17 aster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42

18 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

19 If the Secretary assigns a grade quality for the 1999

20 crop of an agricultural commodity marketed by an associa21 tion described in this section that is below the base quality

22 of the agricultural commodity, the Secretary shall com23 pensate the association for losses incurred by the associa24 tion as a result of the reduction in grade quality.
3

SCON 77 ATS

1 Up to $81,000,000 of the resources of the Com2 modity Credit Corporation shall be used for the cost of

3 this section: Provided, That the entire amount necessary

4 to carry out this section shall be available only to the ex5 tent that an official budget request for the entire amount,

6 that includes designation of the entire amount of the re7 quest as an emergency requirement as defined in the Bal8 anced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985,

9 as amended, is transmitted by the President to the Con10 gress: Provided further, That the entire amount is des11 ignated by the Congress as an emergency requirement

12 pursuant to section 251(b)(2)(A) and section 252(e) of

13 such Act.

14 SEC. 2. In administering $50,000,000 in emergency

15 supplemental funding for the Emergency Conservation

16 Program, the Secretary shall give priority to the repair

17 of structures essential to the operation of the farm.

Æ
#### ELECTRICAL MOTOR SERVICE and Feisco, Appellants, v. Frank TIRALOSI, deceased and Gloria Tiralosi, surviving spouse of Frank Tiralosi, Appellee.

No. BO-234.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 5, 1987.

John E. McLain, III, and Juan A. Bello, of Cooper, Rissman & Weisberg, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Robert L. Dietz and Brian B. Bolton, of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser *&*Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

JOANOS, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the employer and carrier seek reversal of the deputy commissioner’s order awarding benefits pursuant to section 440.16, Florida Statutes (1983), in connection with the death of Frank Tiralosi on October 2, 1984. The deputy commissioner’s order is supported by competent substantial evidence and is affirmed. *Citrus Central, Inc. v. Gardner,*466 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

Because of the circumstances surrounding the issue of appellate attorney’s fees in this case, we address this point briefly. Appellee has petitioned this court for an award of an appellate attorney’s fee, pursuant to section 440.34(5), Florida Statutes (1983). In support of this petition, appellee has provided an itemized statement which reflects that her attorneys expended 52 hours in preparation of this appeal.

The employer and carrier have filed an objection to appellee’s motion. According to employer and carrier, their attorneys expended only 16.6 hours in preparation of this appeal. In support of their objection to appellee’s petition, employer and carrier have filed an affidavit which represents that $2,500 is a reasonable fee for the services of appellee’s attorney.

Appellee’s motion for an appellate attorney’s fee is granted. However, because of the dispute surrounding the question of what a reasonable fee should be, the matter is remanded to the deputy commissioner for the assessment of the amount of the appellate fee, in accordance with *Sierra v. Sierra,*505 So.2d 432 (Fla.1987).

The deputy commissioner’s order is affirmed, and the cause is remanded for a determination of the amount of appellate *99attorney’s fee due for services rendered by appellee’s counsel in connection with this appeal.

BOOTH, Chief Judge, and NIMMONS, J., concur.
Exhibit
32.1









INDEX
OIL AND GAS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas, Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lyndon West, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Index Oil and Gas, Inc. and will be
retained by Index Oil and Gas, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.











/s/
Lyndon West


Lyndon
West


Chief
Executive Officer


February
14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17409]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[A(32b)-3-2011]


Foreign-Trade Zone 45--Portland, OR Expansion of Manufacturing 
Authority Epson Portland, Inc. (Inkjet Ink); Notice of Approval of 
Restricted Authority

    On December 22, 2011, the Port of Portland, grantee of Foreign-
Trade Zone (FTZ) 45, requested to expand the scope of manufacturing 
authority approved within Subzone 45F, on behalf of Epson Portland, 
Inc. (EPI), in Hillsboro, Oregon. The request involved the use of 
privileged foreign (PF) status (19 CFR 146.41) inputs in manufacturing 
of ink for inkjet printer cartridges. Notice was given in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (A(32b)-3-2011, 76 FR 81475-81476, 12/
28/2011).
    Section 400.32(b)(1) of the FTZ Board's regulations (15 CFR part 
400) allows the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration to act 
for the Board in making decisions on new manufacturing authority when 
the zone benefits sought do not involve the election of non-privileged 
foreign status on items involving inverted tariffs. Pursuant to that 
regulatory provision, on March 8, 2012, the Assistant Secretary for 
Import Administration approved authority to include the use of certain 
PF status inputs in the manufacturing of ink for inkjet printer 
cartridges within Subzone 45F, subject to the FTZ Act (19 U.S.C. 81a-
81u) and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.
    The applicant's request for broader authority, including the 
manufacturing of inkjet ink involving foreign-sourced inputs that would 
be admitted to the subzone under nonprivileged foreign (NPF) status (19 
CFR 146.42), will continue to be reviewed and processed under FTZ 
Docket 7-2012 (77 FR 4006, 1/26/2012).

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7272 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01
 
                       BCP/ESSEX HOLDINGS INC. (DELAWARE)
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                        <C>
Essex Group, Inc.........................................................  Michigan
 
Essex Group, Inc.........................................................  Delaware
 
Essex International, Inc.................................................  Delaware
 
Essex Wire Corporation...................................................  Michigan
 
Diamond Wire & Cable Co..................................................  Illinois
 
US Samica Corporation....................................................  Vermont
 
Essex Group Export Inc...................................................  U.S. Virgin
                                                                           Islands
 
Interstate Industries Holdings Inc.......................................  Delaware
 
Interstate Industries, Inc...............................................  Mississippi
 
Essex Group Mexico Inc...................................................  Delaware
 
Essex Group Mexico, S.A. de C.V..........................................  Mexico
 
SX Mauritius Holding Inc.................................................  Mauritius
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit modification issued under the Antarctic Conservation of 1978, Public Law 95-541.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On March 12, 2012, notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a request for modification to permit 2010 WM-04 (RPSC) for waste management activities at all U.S. Antarctic Program facilities in Antarctica. The requested modification transfers responsibility for waste management activities from the incumbent support contractor, Raytheon Polar Services Company, to Lockheed Martin Corporation. The transfer modified the permit to change the permit holder from Raytheon Polar Services Company to Lockheed Martin Corporation, who is the sole holder of the permit. All special conditions of the original permit remain the same except for the change in name of the permit holder. All references to Raytheon Polar Services Company now apply to Lockheed Martine Corporation.                

Nadene G. Kennedy,

Permit Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-7293 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO RULE 13-14 OR RULE 15-14 OF THE SECURITIES

AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, James K. T. Lu, certify that:



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure  controls and procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the effectiveness of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.



Date: June 29, 2004

By:  /s/ James K. T. Lu



----------------------------



James K. T. LU



Title:  President and Co-Chief Executive Officer
# F **ourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

January 11, 2023

No. 04

- 22

- 00421

- CR

Aaron POUCH

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B19622

- 1 Honorable M. Rex Emerson , Judge P residing



### ORDER

After Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, o n November 22, 2022

, we notified Appellant that if he desire d to file a pro se brief, he must file it by January 3, 2023

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On January 3, 2023 , Appellant filed a pro se motion for access to the appellate record.

We direct the clerk of this court to send Appellant, by first

- class mail, a printed copy of the clerk’s and reporter’s records at no cos t to Appella nt, and to mail the records within one day
of the date of this order.

Appellant also requested additional time to file a pro se brief. The request is granted.
We order Appellant to file his brief within forty days of the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(d). If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than thirty days after the date Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

If this cour t determines Appellant’s appeal is frivolous, Appellant may file a petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.4. Appellant must file the petition with the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals with in thirty days after this court issues its judgment. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.2(a). The petition should be addressed to Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pending further order of this court._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said court on this 11th day of January, 2023

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

S an Antonio, Texas

September 10, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00185

- CR

Adelida TREVINO, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 203

- CR

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in these companion cases was originally due June 28, 2021. In response to this court’s notification that the record was late, the court reporter requested an extension of time to file the record until August 23, 2021, and we granted that request. On August 26, 2021, the court reporter requested an additional extensio n of time until September 7, 2021, for a total extension of 70 days. We granted that request and ordered the court reporter to file the record by September 7, 2021.

As of the date of this order, the reporter’s record has not been filed. We t herefore

ORDER the court reporter to file the record by September 20, 2021 . If the record is not filed within the time provided, we may initiate contempt proceedings.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

cou rt on this 10th day of September, 2021

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of MailTec, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that amendment 1 to the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                 /s/ W. Ross C. Corace
                                 ----------------------
                                 W. Ross C. Corace
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

October 31, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification

 

Thiscertification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) for the yearended December 31, 2004 of CRIIMI MAE Inc. (the “Issuer”).

 

I,Barry S. Blattman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that to the best of myknowledge:

 

(i)                                     the Form 10-Kfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(ii)                                  theinformation contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

 

 
|  March  8, 2005 |   |                       | /s/  Barry S. Blattman |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------|------------------------|
| DATE                 |   | Barry  S. Blattman         |
|                 |   | Chairman  of the Board and |
|                 |   | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors NYMAGIC, INC.:

We consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  registration  statements  (No.
33-10780, 2-94924 and 33-88342) on Form S-8 of NYMAGIC, INC. of our report dated
February 15, 2000 relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of NYMAGIC,  INC.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1999,  and all related  schedules,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 1999 Annual  Report on Form 10-K of
NYMAGIC, INC.


                                /s/ KPMG LLP
                                KPMG LLP

New York, New York
March 30, 2000