alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, GARY A. BEDINI, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
              May 11, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              Gary
              A. BediniGary
                A. Bedini
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 131 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 131

              Relating to the retirement of Ron Kavulick.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 30, 1999

   Mr. Lott (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
Baucus, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Biden, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Breaux, Mr. 
  Bryan, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. 
  Durbin, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Feingold, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Graham, Mr. 
Harkin, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Kerrey, 
   Mr. Kerry, Mr. Kohl, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
  Levin, Mr. Lieberman, Mrs. Lincoln, Ms. Mikulski, Mrs. Murray, Mr. 
 Reed, Mr. Reid, Mr. Robb, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Schumer, 
 Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Wyden) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              Relating to the retirement of Ron Kavulick.

Whereas Ron Kavulick will retire on June 30, 1999, from service to the United 
        States Senate after twenty years as a member of the staff of the 
        Official Reporters of Debates;
Whereas he has served the United States Senate with honor and distinction since 
        joining the staff of the Official Reporters of Debates on October 22, 
        1979;
Whereas his self-determination and hard work as an official reporter resulted in 
        his appointment to the position of Chief Reporter on May 22, 1995;
Whereas Ron Kavulick, as Chief Reporter of the Congressional Record, has at all 
        times executed the important duties and responsibilities of his office 
        with dedication and excellence; and
Whereas Ron Kavulick has demonstrated exemplary service to the United States 
        Senate as an institution and leaves a legacy of superior and 
        professional service: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate expresses its deep 
appreciation and gratitude to Ron Kavulick for his years of faithful 
service to his country and to the United States Senate.
    Sec. 2. That the Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of 
this resolution to Ron and Pat Kavulick.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stanley P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date:November 7, 2013/s/ ALLEN S. GREENEAllen S. GreeneChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ STANLEY P. WIRTHEIMStanley P. WirtheimChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Gerald PAGE and David Page v. The STATE of Louisiana and the Board of Trustees, State Employees Group Benefits Program.

No. 88-C-0175.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Louisiana, State of; Board of Trustees, State; Employees Gp. Ben. Prog./State; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1524; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 283192.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE JAMAL JONES, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 334, 2018 § § § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. K1707019429 § § Submitted: October 1, 2018 Decided: October 5, 2018 ORDER It appears to the Court that, on September 19, 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice to the appellant to show cause why his appeal should not

be dismissed for his failure to file his opening brief and appendix. The appellant failed to fi le a response within the ten- day time period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HERE BY ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), th at the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE FINANCE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      May 6, 2009
              /s/
      Jing XieJing
      XieChief
      Financial Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

**AUSTIN**

Hon. Joab Campbell County Attorney, Sohleloher Oounty Eldorado

, Taxae /\ Dear Sir: Opinion Eo. O-1538 A\

RiB:

This till stated above. It3 it neceeesry la

ooaTlotioa under sea. &&&$~~

aoknowl 0 43 eooi **t 0**  **your inquiry**  a0

**We** quote sldaratlonr the Aot under ~mmIt ie our opinion that thilr lrtatuta

ia neverable. The firat portion thereofprohibitsthe hunting or shooting of migratorybird8 or @me birde with *a ahotguu larger than teqT(qaage and that IB oapable or holdingmere than three shc?$s at one leading",etc. She next~alaued,Ron. Joab Caepbsll,page Z

*and providingthat li a magmslae-loading gun is **used** and the magazine of suoh guo uould otherwisehold more than two (2) shells,berore suoh gus **is used**  it shall be permanently

plugged',**eto., provides**  another dlstInct ntstutoryprohibition.

In other rords, It **is** mede unlawful 'to hunt or shootmourning **doves,** *bite-winged **doves, or**  **sny ri**  **gratory bird,**  or any other game blrd o? this State tithe a si:otgun

larger than ten-gauge and that is oapable of holdingmore than three (3) shells at **on8** loading,Ineluding the ahell that may be held In the ohamber of suoh gun- whether said gun la a mngaslne-loadlug gun or not. It 18 rurthermdo unlawful to use an Qsgaslne-I? loading*gun which has not been properlyp wed in oomFlIance

with the statute.
It is also our opinion that it would bs neossBary to allege snd prove use of a ps or shotgus larger **than** ten-gaugefor suocesatulproseeutlon OS say **offend er**  not using a -asine-loading* gun but mah allegation and proof would not be esaentlalIf saoh a Wagaalaeloading*gun be used.

In examlnlngthe entire Aot of whlob Seotlon 4 -ofArt1018 **WQa-4.18 a**  part (B.B. 51, oh. 19, p. 1889, Aots **45th** Leg., Bd C.S.) we find reference In the amergenoy clause; asme being 3eo. 9 of the bill, to **tbs** Federal regulationsand the Inteut of the Legls~ture to **avoid** oonfliot tberewlth 18 apparent.

**We** point out that Regulation 3 of the United states DeparvAentof **the** Interiormrcau of BlologIoal Surrey reads a8 followa:

WRegulations3.- Keotis by **v&job migratory**  **game birds**  **may be**  teken. *The raigratory

game birds on whioh opas Beasoas are speolfied in Regulation4 ,of **these** reguulationsmay **be** taken during suoh reBpeotI+BOpSn seasonswith **bow** and error or **with** a shotgua not larger than No. 10 gauge fired from the shoulder, exoeptas permittedby regulations9,8,9 and 10 oi these regulations,**but** ther shal.1 not be **tsksn**Hon. Joab CmpSeI.1,pane S

with or by means of any automatlo-loading or bend-operated

repeetln6shotgun capable of holding more than three **BbellB,** the magazine of whloh has not been out oft or plug@ with a one-piecemetal or wooden rlller lnoapableof removal throughthe loading end 'thereor, so as to reduce tho capsoityof eaid gun to not more than three shellsat one time in the magazine and ohamber oomblned:l t + * Trusting that the above'satisfaotorily **4nBwarB** your ln~ulry,we are

YOUrB very truly
#### Luby R. THOMAS, et al. v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO., et al. Scott E. THOMAS v. STATE FARM INSURANCE CO., et al. Mary Frances TUGGLE v. STATE, Through DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, et al. Billy Phillip TUGGLE v. STATE, Through DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, et al.

No. 87-C-0002.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Tuggle, Mary Frances; Tuggle, Billy Phillip; applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 18284-CA, 18285-CA; Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 28648, 28649.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 562.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.0


                            CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of
the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   November 19, 2004


/s/Matthew L. Schissler
-----------------------
Matthew L. Schissler
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Albert EDMOND v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58391.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 11, 1989.

Albert Edmond, Parchman, pro se.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Billy L. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; William F. Coleman, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

PITTMAN, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                   |        |                            
|------------------ | ------ | ---------------------------
|Date: May 19, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MATTHEW L. SCHISSLER   
|                   | Name:  | Matthew L. Schissler       
|                   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
|                   |        | and Chief Financial Officer
#### James C. PARKER v. Joan Davis PARKER.

86-607.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 18, 1987.

Floyd C. Enfinger, Jr., Montrose, for appellant.

Richard C. Lacey, Fairhope, for appellee.

ADAMS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of the defendant, Joan Davis Parker. The plaintiff, James C. Parker, filed a complaint against his ex-wife Joan Parker, claiming that she had perjured herself during their divorce proceedings, thereby committing a fraud upon the court to his detriment. The court granted defendant Parker’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. No evidence was presented to the court. We affirm.

At 15A C.J.S. *Conspiracy*§ 16, the following appears:

> [A]s a general rule, in the absence of statute, no action lies to recover damages caused by perjury, false swearing, subornation of perjury, or an attempt to suborn, an action for damages for conspiracy to commit perjury and for the giving of false testimony or for subornation or attempted subornation of perjury, cannot ordinarily be maintained....

The plaintiff has not alleged in his complaint any facts which would take his case without the operation of the general rule. Thus, the trial judge committed no error in dismissing his complaint. The judgment is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - 32 CFR Part 311
          - [Docket ID DOD-2012-OS-0027]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, DoD.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule with request for comments; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On March 16, 2012, the Department of Defense published a direct final rule titled Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation. This rule corrects a system identifier error in the amended text.

# DATES:

Effective May 25, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Toppings, (571) 372-0485.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On March 16, 2012, the Department of Defense published a direct final rule titled Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation. Subsequent to the publication of that direct final rule, Department of Defense discovered that the system identifier “DMDC 13” in § 311.8(c)(17) should have read “DMDC 11”.

## Correction

In the final rule (FR Doc. 2012-6167) published on March 16, 2012 (77 FR 15587-15588), make the following correction:

§ 311.8 

On page 15588, in § 311.8, in the first column, in paragraph (c)(17), “DMDC 13, Investigative Records Repository” should read “DMDC 11, Investigative Records Repository”.

Dated: March 19, 2012.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2012-6925 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Peter Dexter, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

September 13, 1956

and September 14, 1956.

*461
      *John P. Gering*for proponent.

*M. Rudolph Preuss*for contestant.

*Alexander Jacobson*for Mary Huhn, coexecutrix and beneficiary.

John D. Bennett, S.

The motion of Frank R. Dexter for an examination before trial is granted as to all items in the notice. In the absence of special circumstances *(Matter of Brady,*273 App. Div. 968; *Matter of Cosgro,*153 N. Y. S. 2d 174; *Matter of Frank,*165 Misc. 411, 414) the examination will be limited to a period beginning three years immediately prior to June 22, 1951 and extending to two years subsequent to December 1, 1952. Item 4 will be limited to testamentary capacity of the decedent as it bears on the alleged fraud and undue influence *(Matter of Coen,*128 N. Y. S. 2d 166).

All relevant records, documents, books, papers and other written or printed data pertaining to the subject matter of the examination in the custody or control of Frank R. Dexter should be produced for inspection and use in accordance with section 296 of the Civil Practice Act.

Although records in the possession of an attorney may be made available at an examination, at which time, if appropriate, any proper claim of privilege may be asserted (see Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 353, 354; cf. *Matter of Morrell,*154 Misc. 356, 360), the motion is denied as to John P. Gering, the attorney, without prejudice to renewal upon such papers as will set forth facts, rather than naked conclusions, showing such special circumstances as would justify his examination as a witness pursuant to section 288 of the Civil Practice Act *(Matter of Weth,*135 N. Y. S. 2d 70; *Matter of Levy,*92 N. Y. S. 2d 211; *Matter of La Vigne,*107 N. Y. S. 2d 260; *Matter of McConnell,*107 N. Y. S. 2d 258).

The examination will proceed at a time and place to be fixed in the order.

Submit order on notice.

*462(September 14, 1956.)

No affidavit was submitted in opposition to this motion for a bill of particulars although in a companion motion for an examination before trial, it was urged by the objectant that the bill be required to be served after the completion of the examination. In the opinion of this court, the position of the objectant is correct. Service of the bill after a party has obtained such facts as can be adduced through the use of an examination will permit him far more satisfactorily to amplify the pleadings, limit proof, define issues, and prevent surprise at the trial. Such a procedure places a corresponding duty on the objectant to furnish a bill which will serve these functions (see *Matter of Ludlam,*154 N. Y. S. 2d 989; *Matter of*Meyers, 158 Misc. 942, 944; *Matter of Walsh,*154 N. Y. S. 2d 987).

The motion is granted. The bill of particulars is to be served 20 days after completion of the examination before trial.

Submit order on notice.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 76 ) IV-E-7 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM

Sheet 76 of 117P. 2

Septembe r 23 , 199 8

SUBJECT : FROM : Septembe

r 2. 199 8 Telephon e conversatio n wit h David Hawkin s on th e Jul y 24 , 199 8 Notic e o f

Availabilit

y fo r Commen t Concernin g Issue s o n th e Actual-t o Futur e Actua l Tes t and Adjustment s t o Plantwid e Applicabilit y Limits . Denni s Crumpler , NS R Refor mTea mLeade r Integrate d Implementatio n group , ITPID (MD-12 ) TO : Ai r

Docke t A-90-3 7 Participants : Davi d Hawkin s U.S . EP A Lydi aWegman , To mCurran Le aAnderso n Kare n Blanchar d Denni s Crumple r Jocely n deGrandpr e Jo n Devin e Gre g Foot e Mik e Sewel l Davi d Solomo n Ann aMari e Woo d Natura l Resou r OAQP S OAQPS/ITPI D OG C OAQPS/II G OAQPS/II G OG C OG C OG C OAQPS/II G OAQPS/II G OPA R 

# r

Thi s conferenc e call wa s initiate d b y EP A becaus e David Hawkin s wa s unabl e to atten d the Septembe

r 3 , 199 8 meetin g o f

litigant s wit

h regar d to tw o rule s revisions—on e promulgate d in 1980 (CM

A exhibit B ) and th e othe

r i n 199 2 (WEPCO)-unde r appea l to th e Firs t

Circui t Cour t o f Appeals . Th e litigation s wer e merge d b y th e Cour

t in 199 8 afte

r industr y plaintiff s as k th e cour t to reactivat

e th e litigations . I

n subsequen

t settlemen t negotiation s th e litigant s agree d t o mee t three time s ove

r th e fal l o f 199 8 t o discus s how th e Ne

w Sourc e Review Refor

m rulemakin g migh

t addres s the provision s unde r litigation . Th

e firs t wa s to b e o n Septembe

r 3 , 1998 . A s aresult

o f hi s foreknow

n absenc e Mr . Hawkin s wa s asked t o provide hi s feedbac

k on EPA' s Jul y 24 , 199 8 Notic e o f

Availabilit

y fo r Commen t Concernin g Issue s on the Actual-to Future-Actua

l Tes t and Adjustment s to Plantwid e Applicabilit y Limits . Mr . Hawkin s strongl

y supporte d th e replacemen t o f th e 199 2 WEPC O rule .
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**














**Certification
      of Principal Accounting Officer Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350**








In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Rotoblock Corporation
      (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Howard, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      the
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Registrant.








Date:
      September 14, 2006     ROTOBLOCK
      CORPORATION





/s/
      Thomas M. Howard


By:
      Thomas M. Howard, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and
      Director