alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7543** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CHARAZZ KEVIN MORAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James C. Turk , Senior District Judge. ( 7:06

- cr - 00051

- jct

- 1; 7:08

- cv - 80054

- jct

- mfu )

Submitted : March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER , SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published p er curiam opinion
. Charazz Kevin Moran, Appellant Pro Se
. Donald Ray Wolthuis , Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charazz Kevin Moran seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable j urists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on proce dural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the rec ord and conclude that Moran has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for appointment of counsel and a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions a re adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 311 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 311

   To express the sense of the Senate regarding Federal procurement 
            opportunities for women-owned small businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23. 2000

 Mr. Bond (for himself, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Burns, Ms. Snowe, 
Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Murray and 
 Mr. Harkin) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   To express the sense of the Senate regarding Federal procurement 
            opportunities for women-owned small businesses.

Whereas women-owned small businesses are the fastest growing segment of the 
        business community in the United States;
Whereas women-owned small businesses will make up more than one-half of all 
        business in the United States by the year 2010;
Whereas in 1994, the Congress enacted the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act 
        of 1994, establishing a Government-wide goal for small businesses owned 
        and controlled by women of not less than 5 percent of the total dollar 
        value of all prime contracts and subcontract awards for each fiscal 
        year;
Whereas the Congress intended that the departments and agencies of the Federal 
        Government make a concerted effort to move toward that goal;
Whereas in fiscal year 1999, the departments and agencies of the Federal 
        Government awarded prime contracts totaling 2.4 percent of the total 
        dollar value of all prime contracts; and
Whereas in each fiscal year since enactment of the Federal Acquisition 
        Streamlining Act of 1994, the Federal departments and agencies have 
        failed to reach the 5 percent procurement goal for women-owned small 
        businesses: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the Senate strongly urges the President to adopt a 
        policy in support of the 5 percent procurement goal for women-
        owned small businesses, and to encourage the heads of the 
        Federal departments and agencies to undertake a concerted 
        effort to meet the 5 percent goal before the end of fiscal year 
        2000; and
            (2) the President should hold the heads of the Federal 
        departments and agencies accountable to ensure that the 5 
        percent goal is achieved during fiscal year 2000.
                                 <all>
```
#### Johnny HUGHLEY v. STATE.

CR-91-1639.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 1993.

Dan C. Totten, Athens, for appellant.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Horace Lynn, Dept, of Corrections, for appellee.

*On Return to Remand*

PATTERSON, Judge.

We remanded this case to the trial court on March 26, 1993, with instructions to hold an evidentiary hearing on Johnny Hughley’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and to determine what evidence had been considered by the hearing officer in Hughley’s two *705prison disciplinary proceedings — one charge of making threats and another charge of inciting to riot. 629 So.2d 703. From the record before us on original submission we could not determine whether the proceedings met the minimum standards of due process. The trial court has complied with our instructions and has duly filed its return.

The findings of the trial court disclose that there was both hearsay evidence and direct evidence introduced at the two prison disciplinary proceedings. The investigating officer testified at each hearing about the results of his investigation. In addition, in support of the charge of making threats, an inmate testified that Hughley had directly threatened him with bodily harm, and in support of the charge of inciting inmates to riot, an inmate testified that Hughley had taunted him, had made highly inflammatory remarks concerning racial and religious differences in the prison, and had stated that all white men were devils and needed to be killed and that the prison was the place to begin.

Hughley contends that he was denied due process guaranteed by *Wolff v. McDonnell,*418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974), because, he says, the hearing officer’s findings of guilt were based on insufficient evidence. We do not agree. Due process requires that a state disciplinary board’s decision not be made arbitrarily or capriciously, but be based upon some evidence. *Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Walpole v. Hill,*472 U.S. 445, 105 S.Ct. 2768, 86 L.Ed.2d 356 (1985); *Heidelburg v. State,*522 So.2d 337 (Ala.Cr.App.1988). We find that the hearing officer’s findings of guilt in this case were based on some evidence and, thus, the findings meet the due process requirements of *Wolff v. McDonnell.*

The judgment of the trial court dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus is due to be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.
Missouri Department of Natural Resources Modeling for 2013 Lead SIP:

The purpose of my analysis was to determine the predicted 3
- month lead concentrations in Illinois. The model i ng that the MDNR did for the latest lead SIP did not extend past the border between Missouri and Illinois. I did not have the modeling files on the March 2013 CD for the Herculaneum Lead Smelter. The new modeling files have a fine receptor grid inside Herculaneum’s current property/fence line. This allows nonattainment areas to be defined within the current property/fenced area. MDNR modeled t wo scenarios
. Scenario A includes emissions from the refinery building short stacks while Scenario B ducts these e missions from t he current refinery building baghouse number 9
. I modeled only Scenario A as it had the highest predicted lead concentrations. MDNR’s analyses included only meteorological data from the Broad Street meteorological site for the calendar year 2009. My anal ys i s includes Broad Street meteorological data from February 1, 2007 thru December 31, 2009. (These data were available when MDNR did the initial analyses). The AERMET version 11059 was used by MDNR and EPA. A background value of 0.032 g/m 3 was include d in all analyses. MDNR’s highest 3

- month lead concentrations at the Illinois border (middle of the Mississippi River) is about 0.075 g/ m 3 or half the lead NAAQS. My analysis indicates a similar value. (See F igures 1
- 3 ). My highest 3

- month lead concentration in Illinois (land) is about 0.06 g/ m 3

. The nearest Illinois residence is about 1900 meters inside Illinois and the predicted lead concentration is at least 0.037 g/m 3

. (See Figures 1
- 3. No MDNR analysis). MDNR’s highest 3
- month lead conc entrations in its “minimum” fenced area s is about 0.614 g/m 3 , or about 4 times the lead NAAQS. My analysis indicated a similar high value. (See Figures 4

- 5). MDNR’s two proposed fenced areas enclose lead concentrations of 0.15 g/m 3 or greater. They surround the strip mill (Figure 7A) and refinery or remelter ( Figure 6A) areas. My modeling of the fence post receptors show (Figures 6 and 7) that MDNR’s proposed fenced areas must be modified . There are numerous receptors that exceed the NAAQS of 0.15 g/m 3

. The differences in concentrations are probably due to my using additional on - site meteorological data and the latest version of AERMOD (12345). Predicted lead concentrations greater tha n 0.15 g/m 3 extend into the main railway which is ambient air. (See Figures 4 & 4A). Figures 1A
- 5A, are without lead contours and give a clearer representation of the area. SUMMARY: Significant lead emissions from the Doe Run Herculaneum lead smelte r extend into Illinois. There are predicted lead concentrations in ambient air greater than 0.15 g/m 3 east of the remelter area. Fenced areas inside Doe Run’s current facility must be modified to avoid nonattainment of the lead NAAQS. MDNR should reana lyze the strip mill and remelter areas using the latest versions of A ERMOD and its preprocessors in order to better define the fenced areas.
#### SUCCESSION OF Frances G. ALBRITTON.

No. 86-C-2223.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Albritton, Lanelle Tanner — Other; applying for reconsideration of writ denial of December 19, 1986, 498 So.2d 742; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5114; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 79-8037.

Reconsideration denied. Judgment is definitive. La.C.C.P. art. 2166.
#### Willie Lewis HUNT, Appellant, v. Matthew NICHOLS and Angela Passmore, Appellees.

No. 87-2335.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 4, 1988.

Morgan & Stamm and Warren J. Stamm, Miami, for appellant.

*1041Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane and Shelley H. Leinicke, Fort Lauderdale, Marlow, Shofi, Connell, Valerius, Abrams, Lowe *&*Adler and Karen J. Haas, Miami, for appel-lees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Burns v. GCC Beverages, Inc.,*502 So.2d 1217, 1220 (Fla.1986); *Pokomy v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,*382 So.2d 678, 682 (Fla.1980).
UNALASKA iSLANO

27August2012

Mr. Dennls J. DeVany Chief, EAS and DomesticAnalysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE Washington DC 20590 Re: EssentialAir ServiceforAkutan, Alaska Mr. DeVany, My letter of 7 August 2012 provided you with comments from the City of Akutan regarding essential airserviceforAkutan (copy attached). We indicated the City is supportive of replacing PenAir as the EAS carrier forAkutan through the required RFP process. However, we would still appreciate answers to the questions posed to you in the August 6th letter in order for the cityto adopt afinal position and recommendations. In the meantime, we are in receipt of copies of letters directed to you from PenAir and State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, requesting that EAS service "be changed from Akutan Seaplane Base (KQA) to the new airport for Akutan on Akun Island (ICAO:PAUT;FAA:TAK)." Once again, this is an action the City can support, ifwe are informed about the aircraft to be used to service the new airport. Using the current Grumman Goose for this purpose is not a reasonable or acceptable alternative, since the residents of Akutan and Trident Seafoods will have to live with the same poor quality service, and pay more to use the airport marine link betweenAkun Island and thevillage/Trident 

# . '·Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 27August2012 Page?

For this reason, we understand and support the goal of getting Grant Air to begin immediate interim service with the**Ki~g** Air, pending the selection of a new EAS carrier, per the RFP processthat I**undE3~StC3Qd** is already underway.**·'~'** . Sincerely, IS/ Joe Bereskin Mayor Enclosure Via E-Mail cc: Marc Luiken, Commissioner, State ofAlaska DOT&PF Honorable Stanley Mack, Mayor, Aleutians East Borough
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 119

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United Nations General

Assembly Resolution ES–10/6.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BROWNBACK, and Mr.

LAUTENBERG) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on Foreign Relations

JUNE 30, 1999

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

JULY 1, 1999

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United

Nations General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6.

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations General Assembly voted on February 9, 1999, to

pass Resolution ES–10/6, ‘‘Illegal Israeli Actions In Occupied East Jerusalem And The Rest Of The Occupied

Palestinian Territory’’, to convene for the first time in 50

years the parties of the Fourth Geneva Conference for

the Protection of Civilians in Time of War;

Whereas such resolution unfairly places full blame for the deterioration of the Middle East Peace Process on Israel
2

SRES 119 ATS

and dangerously politicizes the Geneva Convention, which

was established to deal with critical humanitarian crises;

and

Whereas such vote is intended to prejudge direct negotiations, put additional and undue pressure on Israel to influence the results of those negotiations, and single out

Israel for unprecedented enforcement proceedings which

have never been invoked against governments with

records of massive violations of the Geneva Convention:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) commends the Department of State for the

3 vote of the United States against United Nations

4 General Assembly Resolution ES–10/6 affirming

5 that the text of such resolution politicizes the

6 Fourth Geneva Convention which was primarily hu7 manitarian in nature;

8 (2) urges the Department of State to continue

9 its efforts against convening the conference; and

10 (3) urges the Swiss government, as the deposi11 tary of the Geneva Convention, not to convene a

12 meeting of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Æ
# Europos Sąjungos C 138I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 138I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 63 metai2020m. balandžio 28d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 138I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

63 metai2020m. balandžio 28d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Pranešimai |
| | EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI |
| | Europos Komisija |
| 2020/C 138 I/01 | Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2020/560, kuriuo dėl specialių COVID-19 protrūkio poveikio žvejybos ir akvakultūros sektoriui švelninimo priemonių iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (ES) Nr. 508/2014 ir (ES) Nr. 1379/2013 | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

IV   Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

2020/C 138 I/01

Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2020/560, kuriuo dėl specialių COVID-19 protrūkio poveikio žvejybos ir akvakultūros sektoriui švelninimo priemonių iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (ES) Nr. 508/2014 ir (ES) Nr. 1379/2013

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

IV Pranešimai

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS INSTITUCIJŲ, ĮSTAIGŲ IR ORGANŲ PRANEŠIMAI

Europos Komisija

| 28.4.2020 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2020

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 138/1

---

Komisijos pareiškimas dėl Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamento (ES) 2020/560, kuriuo dėl specialių COVID-19 protrūkio poveikio žvejybos ir akvakultūros sektoriui švelninimo priemonių iš dalies keičiami reglamentai (ES) Nr. 508/2014 ir (ES) Nr. 1379/2013

(2020/C 138 I/01)

Komisija palankiai vertina tai, kad Europos Parlamentas ir Taryba skubiai priima jos pasiūlymą iš dalies pakeisti Europos jūrų reikalų ir žuvininkystės fondo nuostatas, kuriuo siekiama sušvelninti COVID-19 protrūkio poveikį ir padėti mūsų žvejams bei žvejėms ir akvakultūros produktų gamintojams.

Komisija nori pabrėžti, kad žuvininkystės kontrolė ir mokslinių duomenų rinkimas yra itin svarbūs siekiant tvariai valdyti žuvų išteklius remiantis patikimiausiomis turimomis mokslinėmis rekomendacijomis ir patikimu vykdymo užtikrinimu. Tai, kad minėtiems dalykams bus skiriama mažiau finansinių išteklių, neturėtų neigiamai atsiliepti šių esminių bendros žuvininkystės politikos elementų rezultatams.

Komisija nori atkreipti dėmesį į tai, kad jos pasiūlymu ir padarytais jo pakeitimais atsižvelgiama į ypatingą krizinę situaciją, susidariusią dėl COVID-19 protrūkio, ir į išskirtinį ir neatidėliotiną poreikį teikti paramą, padedančią kovoti su šio protrūkio padariniais. Tai negali daryti poveikio būsimam reglamentui dėl Europos jūrų reikalų ir žuvininkystės fondo.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,990
<PP&E>                                       3,169,461
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,583,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     630,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,451
<SALES>                                        197,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,905
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               195,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,941
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of SAFLINK Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jon C. Engman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 30, 2004



/s/    JON C. ENGMANJon C. Engman Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to SAFLINK Corporation, and will be retained by SAFLINK Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January
      20, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
      M. CancioHugo
      M. CancioTitle:
      Principal Executive Officer