alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      293
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25
<INVENTORY>                                        883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,400
<PP&E>                                           9,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                     399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,757
<SALES>                                            734
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   734
<CGS>                                            1,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,108)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 OFFICERS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Allan C. Silber, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of Acceris
Communications Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: October 25, 2004 By:
    /s/  Allan C. SilberAllan C. SilberChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 243

Notifying the House that the Senate is ready to proceed to business.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24, 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Notifying the House that the Senate is ready to proceed

to business.

1 Resolved, That the Secretary inform the House of

2 Representatives that a quorum of the Senate is assembled

3 and that the Senate is ready to proceed to business.

Æ
#### Stanley G. McNATT, Petitioner, v. CITY OF ORLANDO, et al., Respondents.

No. 88-536.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 16, 1988.

*1023Wallace W. Tudhope of Smalbein, Johnson, Rosier, Bussey, Rooney & Ebbets, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner.

Steven F. Lengauer of Eubanks, Hilyard, Rumbley, Meier & Lengauer, P.A., Orlando, for respondents.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

McNatt, a plaintiff and defendant in consolidated cases below, petitions for writ of certiorari to review an order granting the city of Orlando’s motion to compel production of witness statements.

Petitioner alleges the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in ordering the production because the statements “invaded the work product privilege and/or attorney-client privilege.” We cannot issue our writ based upon a bald assertion of that kind. It must be somehow demonstrated in the record that the statement would constitute such a violation. Here there is no such showing either in the written objection or in a recorded hearing. There was a hearing, unrecorded.

Because petitioner has failed clearly to demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law we must deny the writ.

WRIT DENIED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.
FAA-2C>O~-1211

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti "!31d/ ~-

I{(-gional Airline Association D:n'{' LoUcrer

&/3/£-'1 --

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman l:j$k1 --_.

ATA Craig Fabian 051[/1 -
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 179

Designating October 15, 1999, as ‘‘National Mammography Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. BIDEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating October 15, 1999, as ‘‘National Mammography

Day’’.

Whereas according to the American Cancer Society, in 1999,

175,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and

43,300 women will die from this disease;

Whereas in the decade of the 1990’s, it is estimated that

about 2,000,000 women will be diagnosed with breast

cancer, resulting in nearly 500,000 deaths;

Whereas the risk of breast cancer increases with age, with a

woman at age 70 years having twice as much of a chance

of developing the disease as a woman at age 50 years;

Whereas at least 80 percent of the women who get breast

cancer have no family history of the disease;

Whereas mammograms, when operated professionally at a

certified facility, can provide a safe and quick diagnosis;
2

•SRES 179 IS

Whereas experts agree that mammography is the best method

of early detection of breast cancer, and early detection is

the key to saving lives;

Whereas mammograms can reveal the presence of small cancers up to 2 years or more before a regular clinical breast

examination or breast self-examination, reducing mortality by more than 30 percent; and

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for localized breast cancer

is currently 97 percent: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates October 15, 1999, as ‘‘National

3 Mammography Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling upon the people of the United States

6 to observe such day with appropriate programs and

7 activities.

Æ
# Uradni list C 70I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 070I |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Letnik 634. marec 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 070I

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Letnik 634. marec 2020

---

| Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- |
| | Popravki |
| | Popravek Razpisa za prosto delovno mesto PE/242/S – Direktor (M/Ž) (funkcionalna skupina AD, razred 14) – Generalni direktorat za inovacije in tehnološko podporo – direktorat za založništvo, inovacije in obdelavo podatkov ( UL C 065A 28.2.2020 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Stran

Popravki

Popravek Razpisa za prosto delovno mesto PE/242/S – Direktor (M/Ž) (funkcionalna skupina AD, razred 14) – Generalni direktorat za inovacije in tehnološko podporo – direktorat za založništvo, inovacije in obdelavo podatkov ( UL C 065A 28.2.2020 )

( UL C 065A 28.2.2020 )

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

Popravki

| 4.3.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | CI 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

CI 70/1

---

Popravek Razpisa za prosto delovno mesto PE/242/S – Direktor (M/Ž) (funkcionalna skupina AD, razred 14) – Generalni direktorat za inovacije in tehnološko podporo – direktorat za založništvo, inovacije in obdelavo podatkov

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije C 65 A z dne 28. februarja 2020
  )

(2020/C 70 I/01)

Stran 57, točka 2, Kraj zaposlitve:

besedilo:

„Luxembourg.“

se glasi:

„Bruselj.“.

---
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL LASTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5407

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 3, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. Shonna Young Gay , Judge

.

Christopher Michael Laster, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E

. Markh am, Assistant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Scrap China Corporation  and
subsidiaries, (the “Company”) on 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Richard
Ivanovick Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






November
      14, 2008
            /s/Richard
      R Ivanovick, CAChief
      Financial Officer





---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000847464
<NAME>                        MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         161,018
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  572,160
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    542,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,322,766
<PP&E>                                         1,335,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (623,897)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,931,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,499,017
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,618,500
<COMMON>                                       11,122,017
<OTHER-SE>                                     999,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,931,501
<SALES>                                        4,607,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,844,784
<CGS>                                          2,763,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,763,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,591,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (982,864)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (982,864)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.035)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.035)



</TABLE>
#### Carl LINDBACK, III, Appellant, v. Niki LESKO and Loran Van Vleet, Appellees.

No. 87-9.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1987.

Kenneth H. Smith, Tavernier, for appellant.

Tittle & Tittle and Gus H. Crowell, Tav-ernier, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY * and JORGENSON, JJ.

*

 Judge Hendry did not hear oral argument.

*719PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion in the order under review granting a new trial on the well-articulated and fully supported grounds that the jury verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence and indicated that the jury had been influenced by considerations outside the record. See *Ford Motor Co. v. Kikis,*401 So.2d 1341 (Fla.1981); *Cloud v. Fallis,*110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959).

Affirmed.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT



To the Partners of PLM Equipment Growth Fund IV:

Under date of March 17, 2000, we reported on the balance sheets of PLM Equipment
Growth Fund IV (the  "Partnership")  as of December  31, 1999 and 1998,  and the
related statements of operations,  changes in partners' capital,  and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1999,  which
are included in Form 10K. In  connection  with our audits of the  aforementioned
financial  statements,  we also audited the related financial statement schedule
in Form 10K. This  financial  statement  schedule is the  responsibility  of the
Partnership's  management.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on this
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion,  such financial statement schedule,  when considered in relation
to the basic financial  statements  taken as a whole,  presents  fairly,  in all
material respects, the information set forth therein.





/s/ KPMG

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
March 17, 2000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1473
THOMAS E. TILLEY; IRIS M. TILLEY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1-MC-D) Submitted: November 19, 1998 Decided: December 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas E. Tilley, Iris M. Tilley, Appellants Pro Se. Janet A. Bradley, Melissa Anemojanis Holton, Jeffrey Ronald Meyer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; John Francis Corcoran, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas E. and Iris M. Tilley appeal from the district court’sorder denying their petition to quash a summons issued to a thirdparty recordkeeper. We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the petition. See 26 U.S.C.A. § 7609(a)(1), (c)(2)(D) (West Supp. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From:      "Matz, Tim" <tmatz@htcnam.com>                                                    

To:     Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                       

Cc:     Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Curtis

Lesslie <curtis.lesslie@ashgrove.com>, Fran Streitman      |

<fran.streitman@ashgrove.com>                                                               

Date: 11/23/2009 03:31 PM                                                                    

Subject: Portland Cement MACT Rule                                                           

Dear Keith,

I am writing to you today to express Lehigh Cement Company's concurrence with Ash

Grove Cement Company's proposed Beyond the Floor standards and work practices

regarding mercury reductions for the Tehachapi and Durkee cement plant

operations. Lehigh has a shared interest with Ash Grove in promoting a

subcategory for the outlier sources with high mercury limestone. Lehigh is in

agreement with Ash Grove on EPA setting a beyond the floor standard with work

practices for such outliers. Lehigh specifically agrees with the following

proposal for EPA to set a subcategory:

1. Limestone mercury content >225 ppb

2. Establish a floor based on the average uncontrolled emissions of the two

sources in the subcategory category  

3. Impose a minimum technology based limit of 75% control through addition of

activated carbon injection  

4. Require development of a Mercury Minimization Plan

 ‐ Prohibit the use of fly ash as an ingredient in the kiln raw feed

 ‐ Source must limit the acceptance of off‐site raw materials that

contain mercury

 ‐ Source must minimize mercury emissions to the maximum extent possible

 ‐ Source must shuttle main baghouse dust to the finish mill to the

extent allowed by product standards

 ‐ These work practices should be imposed without a specified emission

control since they are site specific Lehigh requests that you and

EPA strongly consider this proposal to set a beyond the floor cement

NESHAPs standard with work practices for these high mercury

limestone sources.

Thank you,

Timothy L. Matz

Corporate Director of Environmental Affairs

Lehigh Hanson

300 East John Carpenter Freeway

Irving, Texas 75062

phone: (972) 653‐3787

cell: (469) 834‐7349

fax: (972) 653‐5693

tmatz@htcnam.com
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C 1350)

 

Each of the undersigned officers of Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

 

(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; as amended, and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

|   |   |              | **Cole Credit Property Trust, Inc.**

  |
|--------|--------|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|   |   |              |                                         | By:  | /s/ Christopher H. Cole |
|   |   |              |                                         | Name:  | Christopher H. Cole |
|   |   |              |                                         | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) |
|   |   |              |                                         |   |   |
|   |   |              |                                         | By:  | /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr. |
|   |   |              |                                         | Name:  | D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr. |
|   | Date:  | November 12, 2008 |                                         | Title:  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,        regardless of any general information language in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
================================================================================

                    EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certifications
                    -----------------------------------------


The undersigned officers certify that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Medical
Technology & Innovations, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Medical Technology & Innovations, Inc. and will be retained by
Medical Technology & Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

January 8, 2007                        /s/ Jeremy Feakins
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jeremy Feakins (Chief executive officer)

January 8, 2007                        /s/ Jennifer Herman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Jennifer Herman (Chief financial officer)

























--------------------------------------------------------------------------------