alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer
of Tengtu International Corp. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 14, 2003

/s/ John D. Watt
--------------------
John D. Watt
President

/s/Judy Ye
--------------------
Judy Ye
Chief Financial Officer



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Tengtu International Corp. and will be retained by it and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Henry Copans, Appellant, *v.*Arthur T. Dougan et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Another.

*Copans*v. Dougan, 158 App. Div. 896, reversed.

(Argued March 6, 1916;

decided March 21, 1916.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 31, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict in an action to recover upon a promissory note. The answer admits the making and indorsement of the note and that it was intended that defendant Catherine L. Dougan should be the first indorser thereon, and for a further defense alleges that the note was made and executed for the purpose of securing to the defendant Cronk $200 on account of the purchase price of a house and lot which defendant Cronk sold and conveyed to defendant Arthur T. Dougan, and that prior *696to the execution of the note the defendant Dougan had purchased goods for defendant Oronk which were delivered to the latter and Dougan had guaranteed the account, and that at the time of the execution and delivery of the note it was agreed between the parties that defendant Oronk would hold the note and if there was any balance due from him for the goods sold to him by defendant Arthur T. Dougan the same should be deducted from the note; that the plaintiff was present at the time of the execution and delivery of the note and was fully informed as to the agreement in regard thereto and was not an innocent *bonaficle*holder of said note for value; that at the time the note became due there was due from defendant Oronk to the defendant Dougan a sum in excess of the amount of the note.

*Henry Hirschberg*for appellant.

*A. H. F. Seeger*for respondents.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event, on dissenting opinion of Burr, J., below.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cardozo and Pound, JJ. Dissenting: Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ.
Exhibit 4.1


 





 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


December 11, 2020


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2047


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re:  Advisors Disciplined Trust 2047 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined
the Registration Statement File No. 333-248807 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement
of the references to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 		Alex R. Meitzner
	 		Senior Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SmartPros Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, the
undersigned, Allen S. Greene, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stanley
P. Wirtheim, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

              A signed original of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request.



                                    /s/ ALLEN S. GREENE
                                    --------------------
                                       Allen S. Greene
                                   Chief Executive Officer


                                   /s/STANLEY P. WIRTHEIM
                                   -----------------------
                                     Stanley P. Wirtheim
                                   Chief Financial Officer


May 12, 2006
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 2

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require

two-thirds majorities for bills increasing taxes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. KYL (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GRAMM, Mr.

GRAMS, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HELMS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr.

MACK, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SMITH of

New Hampshire, and Mr. THOMPSON) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States to require two-thirds majorities for bills increasing

taxes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several
2

SJ 2 IS

1 States within seven years after the date of its submission

2 for ratification:

3 ‘‘ARTICLE—

4 ‘‘SECTION 1. Any bill to levy a new tax or increase

5 the rate or base of any tax may pass only by a two-thirds

6 majority of the whole number of each House of Congress.

7 ‘‘SECTION 2. The Congress may waive section 1 when

8 a declaration of war is in effect. The Congress may also

9 waive section 1 when the United States is engaged in mili10 tary conflict which causes an imminent and serious threat

11 to national security and is so declared by a joint resolu12 tion, adopted by a majority of the whole number of each

13 House, which becomes law. Any provision of law which

14 would, standing alone, be subject to section 1 but for this

15 section and which becomes law pursuant to such a waiver

16 shall be effective for not longer than 2 years.

17 ‘‘SECTION 3. All votes taken by the House of Rep18 resentatives or the Senate under this article shall be deter19 mined by yeas and nays and the names of persons voting

20 for and against shall be entered on the Journal of each

21 House respectively.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Bratton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|(i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.
|---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2011



/s/ Patrick BrattonPatrick BrattonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this Report.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David J. Keefe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 6, 2008



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|    |  | David J. Keefe                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1,736
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    44,931
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (5,979)
<INVENTORY>                                       3,310
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 68,868
<PP&E>                                          604,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  223,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  540,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            91,530
<BONDS>                                         164,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         53,168
<OTHER-SE>                                      112,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    540,286
<SALES>                                         303,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                303,482
<CGS>                                           152,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   152,376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                112,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  4,732
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  24,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                     11,324
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13,375
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.26


</TABLE>
RICKIE FRANCES GOLDSMITH, 

JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-996

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 17, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Gary L. Bergosh, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief-Criminal 

Appeals, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NeuroMetrix, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: November 12, 2009

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
HFO-1234ze SNAP submission

6/2/2010

Bober, Katarzyna to: Melissa Fiffer

Cc: Margaret Sheppard, Monica Shimamura

Dear Melissa,

Thank you for the call and the good news with regards to our submission. My business will be very happy 

to know that the next SNAP listing will be published soon. As discussed, please feel free to remove the 

CBI claim from the individual uses. The Aerosol Propellant, Heat Transfer and Foam Blowing uses no 

longer need the CBI designation.

Best regards,

Kasia
Exhibit 31.2

Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

I, Andre' DiMino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of ADM Tronics
Unlimited, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am the registrant's only certifying officer and am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  December 9, 2005                 /s/ Andre' DiMino
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 302 has
been provided to ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and will be retained by
ADM Tronics Unlimited, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Richard T. Cahill, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Petitioner, against Edwin F. Radel et al., as Members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the City of Kingston, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

November 24, 1958.

*775
      *Matthew V. Cahill*for petitioner.

*William A. Kelly, Corporation Counsel,*for respondents.

Harry E. Schirick, J.

This application is made pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order directing the Board of Police Commissioners .of the City of Kingston to cancel certain appointments to the police force and for other relief incidental thereto. The petitioner, who was third upon an eligible list of 26 promulgated by the Municipal Civil Service Commission on May 13, 1958 as a result of a competitive examination, contends that the appointments as made violate rule VIII of the Buies for the Classified Civil Service prescribed by the Civil Service Commission of the State of New York.

Bule VTII prohibits the passing of more than two names from the head of an eligible list. The petitioner claims this has been done. The respondents deny it.

On June 24, 1958 five appointments were made of candidates placed second, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh on the eligible list. Such appointments passed over only two candidates, namely, numbers one and three, and were in all respects lawful and proper. It appears, moreover, from the uncontroverted proof, that the candidate occupying position No. 1 on the list is physically incapacited from performing the duties of a policeman, at least temporarily. For the duration of such incapacity his name may be omitted from consideration (Civil Service Law, § 14, subd. 4). In effect, therefore, only one name was passed over in the appointments made on June 24.

On July 28, 1958 six additional appointments were made from the list, namely, numbers 9, 10, 12, 13, 14 and 15. At this point numbers 3, 8 and 11 appear to have been passed. Since No. 11 has requested that he be passed for business reasons of his own, these appointments complied with the rule.

Subsequent appointments made on September 10 and September 18, 1958 were all of eligibles bearing numbers 16 to 26 inclusive.

It appears, therefore, that only eligibles bearing numbers 3 and 8 have been passed. This is permitted by law.

The petition is dismissed, without costs.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

April 13, 2010 

via email and regulations.gov 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for an exemption 

 under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (Detroit-Sao Paulo) 

 Docket DOT-OST-2010-0089 

 

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that 

the application be granted as soon as possible. 

 

 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

cc: Service List 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 A copy of the foregoing has been served this 13th day of April, 2010, upon the 

following persons via email: 

 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

howard_kass@usairways.com 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com 

hkamen@coair.com 

dan.weiss@coair.com 

rbkeiner@crowell.com (for Continental) 

mrosia@crowell.com (for Continental) 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

julie.oettinger@united.com 

robert.land@jetblue.com 

jhill@dlalaw.com (for JetBlue) 

dkirstein@yklaw.com (for Spirit) 

jyoung@yklaw.com (for Spirit) 

paul.gretch@dot.gov 

brian.hedberg@dot.gov 

byerlyjr@state.gov 

john.allen@faa.gov 

lester.robinson@wcaa.us 

emily.neuberger@wcaa.us 

joe.cambron@wcaa.us 

mike.orr@airlineinfo.com