alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K as
of December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000846919
<NAME> ESSEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,583
<INVENTORY>                                    233,020
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               442,752
<PP&E>                                         424,197
<DEPRECIATION>                                 136,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 863,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          183,318
<BONDS>                                        316,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           296
<OTHER-SE>                                     294,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   863,752
<SALES>                                      1,701,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,701,329
<CGS>                                        1,370,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,370,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                139,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.83
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **ACCERIS
COMMUNICATIONS INC.**
 
 **OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION**
 **PURSUANT
TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
U.S.C. 1350)**
 
 
 The
undersigned Allan C. Silber, duly appointed and incumbent officer of Acceris
Communications Inc., a Florida corporation (the “Corporation”), in connection
with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best
of his knowledge:
 
 1.
    The
      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 2.
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Corporation.
  ****Date: March 28,
2005
    By:
    /s/ Allan SilberAllan SilberChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|    |  | Patrick Bratton        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00359-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.K.-L. H.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV2016063

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 9, 2021, appellant L.H. filed a notice of appeal from a proposed 

order of termination signed by an associate judge on October 20, 2021. Appellant 

also filed a request for a de novo hearing by the referring court. On December 8, 

2021, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed a motion to 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the referring court has not signed 

a final order. In response, L.H. concedes the termination order is interlocutory 

because the referring court has not held the de novo hearing.
2

When a party timely files a request for a de novo hearing and nothing in the 

record indicates that the appellant waived the right to a de novo hearing, the associate 

judge’s ruling is not a final judgment. See C.A. v. Tex. Dep’t of Family & Protective 

Servs., No. 03-20-00158-CV, 2020 WL 4929786, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 

18, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.). We grant the Department’s motion to dismiss and 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 29, 2021

Opinion Delivered December 30, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 252

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Rebiya Kadeer, her family member

and business associate, should be released by the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2, 2000

Mr. WELLSTONE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Rebiya Kadeer,

her family member and business associate, should be

released by the People’s Republic of China.

Whereas members of the Uighur minority population in

Xinjiang, China, are subject to ongoing repression and

violations of their internationally recognized rights of free

expression, association, and belief;

Whereas on August 11, 1999, the Government of the People’s

Republic of China arbitrarily detained Rebiya Kadeer, a

prominent and respected Uighur businesswoman wellknown in the United States;

Whereas from 1993 to 1998, Ms. Kadeer was an elected

member of the Provincial People’s Political Consultative

Conference in Xinjiang;
2

SRES 252 IS

Whereas in 1995, Ms. Kadeer was a delegate to the United

Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing;

Whereas the police have detained Ms. Kadeer previously and

kept her under close surveillance, threatening her because

of the alleged separatist activities of her husband, who

came to the United States in 1996 and was granted political asylum after publishing articles critical of the Chinese Government;

Whereas on September 2, 1999, Chinese authorities formally

charged Ms. Kadeer with ‘‘illegally offering state secrets

across the border’’, and she is currently detained in

Urumqi, the capital of Xinjiang;

Whereas Ms. Kadeer’s son, Ablikim Abdyirim, and her secretary, Kahriman Abdukirim, were also arbitrarily detained by Chinese security forces in August 1999 in

Urumqi, without any justification or evidence of their involvement in criminal activities of any kind; and

Whereas on November 20, 1999, Ablikim Abdyirim was sent

for 2 years to the Wulabai Reeducation Through Labor

School, without charge or judicial review, in clear violation of international human rights standards, and

Kahriman Abdukirim received a 3-year sentence in the

same facility: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, that the President should express to the

2 representatives of the Government of the People’s Repub3 lic of China the sense of the Senate that Ms. Kadeer, her

4 family member and business associate, should be imme5 diately and unconditionally released.

Æ
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 15, 2010 

p0908 

Order 

 

September 15, 2010 

141033 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141033 

 COA: 296159 

Wayne CC: 08-009824-FC 

LAMAR CLINTON CRAIG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 2, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for 

amendment of the judgment of sentence to reflect a single conviction under 

MCL 750.338b for gross indecency between male and female as a sexually delinquent 

person as defined by MCL 750.10a, with a single sentence of 13 to 40 years, pursuant to 

the plea and sentence agreement. MCL 750.10a is a definitional statute, and does not 

carry the possibility of a separate conviction or sentence independent of other charges in 

the Criminal Code. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
Exhibit 10.1

LOGO



|                             |  |              
|---------------------------- |  | -------------
|DKM/bgh/C1490.04/gcah.136.10 |  | June 25, 2010

Repsol YPF, S.A.

Paseo de la Castellana 278-280

28046 Madrid

Spain

Consent of
Independent Petroleum Engineers

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Gaffney, Cline & Associates Inc. consents to the references to our firm included in Repsol YPF, S.A.s annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Annual Report), and to the inclusion of our reports dated May 21, 2010, as exhibits to the Annual Report.



Very truly yours,GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES/s/ David K. MorganDavid K. Morgan






UNITED KINGDOM        UNITED STATES        
SINGAPORE        AUSTRALIA        ARGENTINA        BRAZIL        KAZAKHSTAN  
      RUSSIA        UAE
### Halogenated Alkylaminium



## Safety **and Handling** 【 **Hazard Codes** 】 Xi:Irritant; 

### 【 **Risk Statements** 】 R36/37/38 

### 【 **Safety Statements** 】 S26;S37/39 

### 【 **Specification** 】 I t belongs to the following product categories, such as Ammonium Salts, Greener Alternatives: Catalysis, Phase Transfer Catalysts and so on. Physical properties are: (1) 

### ACD/LogP: **- 2.60**  ; (2)ACD/LogD (pH 5.5):

- 2.6; (3)ACD/LogD (pH 7.4):

- 2.6; (4)ACD/BCF (pH 5.5): 1; (5)ACD/BCF (pH 7.4): 1; (6)ACD/KOC (pH 5.5 ): 1; (7)ACD/KOC (pH 7.4): 1; (8)#H bond acceptors: 1; (9)#Freely Rotating Bonds: 3.

Wh en you are using this chemical, please be cautious about it as the following: This chemical is irritating to eyes, respiratory system and skin. W hen you are using it, wear suitable gloves and eye/face protection. In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice.
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
              May 11, 2006
            By:
            /s/
              Rick
              M. StreetRick
              M.
              Street
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

A~~ORNLI GENCIIU 

Ron. Claud~fIsbe~ 

Secret 

Austin, 7 exa6 s 

Attentlonr Mr. J. L. :IcCarity 

. 

Dear Sir! 

oplnlon Ho. o-7364 

‘i% have fUly consld%red y 

whether a partloular Qe 

Is 8ubJact to nglstrat 

aark‘ We hah reviewed 

arrd facsll?ille copi 

you under date of 

attorney, for t-ho 

Your lottor dated 0 

a rectfqplar drawing 

Without quotiw the enttra 6tatUte, Article 851, R. C. $ 

‘+ %fS%ct provides that eve 

:bhell hereafter adopt a labe 1: 

incorporated %ssoci%tlon of rsoni4L &it 

trademark, d%slgn, devise, iz print or 

‘tona of advertisonent SW hle the %m% in tha office of the Secret 

“QQ of Stat% by Lea&~ tuo fact%im.il% aopies with the Secretary of 
ffozl. crursk Ieb%ll ” PI&g? 2 

ahal rQm.nt to such ammiatim ao fib 

00$38 alo*; wlufth an attached, ZuIp atLest& 

of 3.2230, for which he ahnll r~calvo s fse
#### STATE ex rel. Tyronne JOHNSON v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, SEC. E, Jack F. Donnelly, Warden.

No. 87-KH-0896.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Johnson, Tyronne; applying for supervisory writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 305-275.

Denied. Relator’s claim that a prior conviction is constitutionally infirm was not presented to the courts below. His other claims lack merit warranting post-conviction relief.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-739]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority: 341]


Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Under Secretary for 
Arms Control and International Security of Authority To Submit Reports 
Regarding the New START Treaty

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), and to the extent authorized by law, I 
hereby delegate to the Under Secretary for Arms Control and 
International Security the authorities and functions delegated to the 
Secretary of State pursuant to the Presidential Memorandum of November 
2, 2011, specifically:
    (1) The authority to make the annual certification specified in 
section (a)(2)(A) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to 
Ratification of the New START Treaty (the Resolution); with the 
Director of National Intelligence, at the direction of the President, 
preparing the report specified in that section. The Under Secretary 
shall submit the certification along with the report prepared by the 
Director of National Intelligence to the Senate.
    (2) The authority to submit the reports specified in section 
(a)(10) and section (a)(12)(B) of the Resolution to the Committees on 
Foreign Relations and Armed Services of the Senate.
    Any act, executive order, regulation or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation or procedure as amended from time to time. 
Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the Deputy 
Secretary, or the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources may at 
any time exercise any authority or function delegated by this 
delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: December 14, 2011.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-739 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5046

_____________________________

CITY OF MIAMI BEACH and

CORVEL CORPORATION,

Appellants,

v.

WILLIAM GEDDES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims.

Sylvia Medina-Shore, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 12, 2011. 

April 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROBERTS, and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Luis F. Estrada of Angones, McClure & Garcia, P.A., Miami, for 

Appellants.

Bill McCabe, Longwood, and Kevin R. Gallagher of The Gallagher 

Law Group, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee.
#### Martin BENNETT, Bennie E. Clark, Laura Bennett Adams, Evisteen Jordan Ross, Theropes Camble and Evis Jordan, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT, William H. Stine, Eva Castor, Lee Castor and J.C. Penney Insurance Company and American Family Home Insurance Company.

No. 87-C-0663.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Stine, William H.; J.C. Penney Insurance Co.; American Family Home Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18156-CA; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 13817.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 1022.

Denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.27.1

                                   AMENDMENT

This AMENDMENT is to the License Agreement dated as of November 6, 1997
(hereinafter, the Agreement) between U. S. Bioscience, Inc. (hereinafter,
Licensor) and Scherico, Ltd. (hereinafter, Licensee), and is effective as of
January  13, 1998.

Any terms used herein which are defined in the Agreement shall have the meanings
ascribed to them in the Agreement.

If there is a conflict between a provision of the Agreement and this Amendment,
then this Amendment shall prevail.

The parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

1.   A new Section 2.8 is hereby added to the Agreement as follows:

               2.8   Licensee shall have the right to expand the Territory to
          include the countries of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and United Arab Emirates
          upon the lapse of preexisting rights to commercialize the Products
          that have been granted by Licensor to Al-Haya Medical Company, Al-
          Faiasel Drugstore and Pharmatrade (Abu Dhabi), respectively.  Licensor
          shall notify Licensee if the right to commercialize the Products in
          any such country becomes available, and Licensee shall thereafter have
          thirty (30) days in which to elect to include such country within the
          Territory under the terms of this Agreement.

2.   Annex II is hereby amended by the addition of the following countries to
the Territory:

     Kuwait
     Qatar
     Oman
     Bahrain
     Lebanon
     Syria

3.   For the countries listed in paragraph 2 above, the notification period
     provided in Section 2.7 of the Agreement is hereby waived, and it is agreed
     that the Licensee shall immediately file applications for the Trademark(s)
     pursuant to Section 2.7 of the Agreement.

This Amendment, to the extent set forth herein, amends, modifies and supplements
the Agreement.  Except as expressly modified herein, all of the terms and
provisions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect and cannot be
amended, modified or changed in any way whatsoever except by a written
instrument duly executed by the parties hereto.
<PAGE>
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by
their authorized representatives on the dates indicated below.



U.S. BIOSCIENCE, INC.                      SCHERICO, LTD.


By:     /s/ Barbara Deptula                By:     /s/ Hans-Jorg Kummer
   ------------------------------------       ---------------------------------


Title:  VP Licensing & Bus. Development    Title:      Director
       --------------------------------          ------------------------------

Date:       January 13, 1998               Date:       January 29, 1998
       --------------------------------         -------------------------------

      




                                       2
### cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge Kimberly Striplin Ann Moore Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 2 (0)-1947 ce,