alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 22

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by

the men and women who have lost their lives while serving as law

enforcement officers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. ALLARD, Mr.

BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. BURNS, Mr.

CLELAND, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr.

DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr.

ENZI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. FRIST, Mr. GORTON, Mr.

GRAMM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HELMS, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

KENNEDY, Mr. KERREY, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. LOTT, Mr.

LUGAR, Mr. MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr.

MURKOWSKI, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. REID, Mr. ROBB, Mr. ROCKEFELLER,

Mr. ROTH, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. SHELBY,

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Commemorating and acknowledging the dedication and sacrifice made by the men and women who have lost their

lives while serving as law enforcement officers.

Whereas the well-being of all citizens of this country is preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;
2

•SRES 22 IS

Whereas more than 700,000 men and women, at great risk

to their personal safety, presently serve their fellow citizens in their capacity as guardians of peace;

Whereas peace officers are the front line in preserving our

children’s right to receive an education in a crime-free

environment that is all too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 158 peace officers lost their lives in the performance

of their duty in 1998, and a total of nearly 15,000 men

and women have now made that supreme sacrifice;

Whereas every year 1 in 9 officers is assaulted, 1 in 25 officers is injured, and 1 in 4,400 officers is killed in the line

of duty; and

Whereas, on May 15, 1999, more than 15,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in our Nation’s Capital to join

with the families of their recently fallen comrades to

honor them and all others before them: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) recognizes May 15, 1999, as Peace Officers

3 Memorial Day, in honor of Federal, State, and local

4 officers killed or disabled in the line of duty; and

5 (2) calls upon the people of the United States

6 to observe this day with the appropriate ceremonies

7 and respect.

Æ
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 80

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10, 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, February 10, 2000,

4 or Friday, February 11, 2000, on a motion offered pursu5 ant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

6 or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

7 on Tuesday, February 22, 2000, or until such time on that

8 day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his des9 ignee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

10 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem-
2

SCON 80 ATS

1 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

2 whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns

3 on the legislative day of Wednesday, February 16, 2000,

4 Thursday, February 17, 2000, or Friday, February 18,

5 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res6 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

7 adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 29,

8 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the sec9 ond day after Members are notified to reassemble pursu10 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

11 occurs first.

12 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

13 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

14 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

15 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen16 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

17 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 16

Proposing a constitutional amendment to establish limited judicial terms of

office.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 25, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. SHELBY, and Mr. HELMS)

introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing a constitutional amendment to establish limited

judicial terms of office.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States:

6 ‘‘ARTICLE—

7 ‘‘The Chief Justice and the judges of both the Su8 preme Court and the inferior courts shall hold their offices

9 for the term of ten years. They shall be eligible for nomi10 nation and, by and with the advice and consent of the Sen-
2

SJ 16 IS

1 ate, for appointment by the President to additional terms.

2 This article shall not apply to any Chief Justice or judge

3 who was appointed before it becomes operative.’’.

Æ
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 336

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the contributions, sacrifices,

and distinguished service of Americans exposed to radiation or radioactive

materials as a result of service in the Armed Forces.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 14, 2000

Ms. SNOWE (for herself, Mr. MURKOWSKI, and Mr. WELLSTONE) submitted

the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the contributions, sacrifices, and distinguished service of Americans

exposed to radiation or radioactive materials as a result

of service in the Armed Forces.

Whereas the Nation has a responsibility to veterans who are

injured, or who incur a disease, while serving in the

Armed Forces, including the provision of health care,

cash compensation, and other benefits for such disabilities;

Whereas from 1945 to 1963, the United States conducted

test explosions of approximately 235 nuclear devices, potentially exposing approximately 220,000 members of the

Armed Forces to unknown levels of radiation, and approximately 195,000 members of the Armed Forces have
2

•SRES 336 ATS

been identified as participants in the occupation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, after World War II;

Whereas many of these veterans later claimed that low levels

of radiation released during such tests, or exposure to radiation during such occupation, may be a cause of certain

medical conditions; and

Whereas Sunday, July 16, 2000, is the 55th anniversary of

the first nuclear explosion, the Trinity Shot in New Mexico: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that—

2 (1) July 16, 2000, should be designated as a

3 ‘‘National Day of Remembrance’’ in order to honor

4 veterans exposed to radiation or radioactive mate5 rials during service in the Armed Forces; and

6 (2) the contributions, sacrifices, and distin7 guished service on behalf of the United States of the

8 Americans exposed to radiation or radioactive mate9 rials while serving in the Armed Forces are worthy

10 of solemn recognition.

Æ
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Patrick Bratton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 3, 2006



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Patrick Bratton    
|    |  | Patrick Bratton        
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Rebamburg@aol.co m 10/21/200 5 09:1 3 A M To : Jame s Turner/R6/USEPA/US@EP A cc : Subject : Re : Acknowledgemen tLanguag e Jim : I apologize , fo rI though t thi s wa s sen t t o yo u las t week . A s well , m yInterne t connectio n ha s bee n ou t fo r severa l days , an d I' m jus t gettin g acces s t o thi s week' s emails . Hop e th e dela ydi d no t caus e yo u an y problems . Pleas e fin d attache d th e appropriate acknowledgmen t t o plac e o n th e necessarypaperwor k fo rth e Gentrys . Le t m e kno wi fyo u nee d anythin g else . Thank s Again , Bo b Cityo fJacksonville , Arkansa s By : Robert E . Bambur g CityAttorne y P . O . Box591 3 Jacksonville, ' A R 7207 8 501-982-630 3 (Phone ) 501-982-228 0 (Fax ) CONFIDENTIALIT YNOTICE : Thi s emai l an d an yattachment s contai n confidentia l an d privilege d informatio n intende d solel y fo rth e intende d recipient . I fyo u ar e no t th e intende d recipient , pleas e d o no t review , retransnniit , copy , o rconvert an yo f thi s information . I freceive d i n error , rebamburq@aol.com pleas e notifym e an d delet e thi s message . ACKNOWLEDGMENT,do c

905034 7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6339

REBECCA LYNN MYERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of the State

of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.

(CA-04-22212-2-HFF)

Submitted: June 9, 2005 Decided: June 16, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rebecca Lynn Myers, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Rebecca Lynn Myers seeks to appeal the district court’s

order adopting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge

and dismissing her petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000),

because she failed to file specific written objections to the

magistrate judge’s report. An appeal may not be taken from the

final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Myers has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                              PALM DESERT ART, INC.


                                    * * * * *

     PALM DESERT ART,  INC., a corporation  organized and existing  under and by
virtue  of  the  General   Corporation   Law  of  the  State  of  Delaware  (the
"Corporation", DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST: The Board of Directors of the Corporation,  by the unanimous written
consent of its  members,  filed with the  minutes  of the  board,  duly  adopted
resolutions  proposing an amendment to the Certificate of  Incorporation  of the
Corporation,  declaring said resolution to be advisable and calling a meeting of
the stockholders of said corporation for consideration  thereof.

The resolution to be considered by the stockholders is as follows:

          RESOLVED,  the Board of  Directors is hereby  authorized  to
          take any and all  action  necessary  to  effect  a  10-for-1
          reverse stock split of the Company's  $.001 par value Common
          Stock  from  25,000,000  issued  and  outstanding  shares to
          2,500,000.

     SECOND: That thereafter,  pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,
the annual meeting of stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held,
at which  meeting the  necessary  number of shares as  required by statute  were
voted in favor of the resolution.



<PAGE>

     THIRD:  That  said  resolution  was duly  adopted  in  accordance  with the
provisions  of  Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.

     FOURTH:  That the  exact  text of  Article  FOURTH  of the  Certificate  of
Incorporation of the Corporation is now as follows:

          "4. The total number of shares of all classes of stock which
     the corporation  shall have the authority to issue is twenty-five
     million (25,000,000), and the par value of each of such shares is
     One Mil ($.001) amount in the aggregate to  Twenty-Five  Thousand
     Dollars ($25,000.00). The Board of Directors is hereby authorized
     to take any and all action necessary to effect a 10-for-1 reverse
     stock split of the  Company's  $.001 par value  Common Stock from
     25,000,000 issued and outstanding shares to 2,500,000."

     FIFTH: That this amendment was adopted as of July 14, 1998.


     I, the UNDERSIGNED,  being the president of the Corporation herein, do make
this Certificate,  hereby declaring and certifying that this is the act and deed
of the Corporation  and the facts herein stated are true, and  accordingly  have
hereunto set my hand this 15th day of July, 1998.

                                            PALM DESERT ART, INC.


                                            By: /s/ Hugh G. Pike 
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Hugh G. Pike, President


Sworn to and subscribed before 
me this 15th day of July, 1998.

/s/  David D. Welty
-------------------------------------
Notary Public
#### Andrea Clesi CRANCH v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 88-C-0196.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

Reconsideration Denied March 25, 1988.

In re Cranch, Andrea Clesi; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 *4281583; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L", No. 296033.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 496.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on: Form S-8/S-3 No.333-86761 pertaining to the 1997 Recruitment Stock Option Plan of I-LinkIncorporated; Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-88881 pertaining to Various WrittenCompensation Contracts of I-Link Incorporated; Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-08483pertaining to the 1995 MedCross, Inc. Employee Stock Option and AppreciationRights Plan of MedCross, Inc.; Form S-8/S-3 No. 333-08477 pertaining to the1995 MedCross, Inc. Director Stock Option and Appreciation Rights Plan ofMedCross, Inc.; and Form S-8 No. 33-81646 pertaining to the 1994 Director StockOption Plan of MedCross, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2003 relating tothe consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|----------------------------|
| Salt Lake City, Utah       |
| April 30, 2003             |

 

----
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 238

To authorize representation of Member of the Senate in the case of Brett

Kimberlin v. Orrin Hatch, et al.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 19, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To authorize representation of Member of the Senate in

the case of Brett Kimberlin v. Orrin Hatch, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Brett Kimberlin v. Orrin Hatch, et

al., C.A. No. 99–1590, pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff has

named as a defendant Senator Orrin G. Hatch; and

Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the

Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. §§ 288b(a)

and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions relating to

their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
2

SRES 238 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed

2 to represent Senator Hatch in the case of Brett Kimberlin

3 v. Orrin Hatch, et al.

Æ
# Amtsblatt C 123A/16.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 123A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 63. Jahrgang16. April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 123A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

63. Jahrgang16. April 2020

---

| Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- |
| | Berichtigungen |
| 2020/C 123 A/01 | Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die dänische Sprache (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die griechische Sprache (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die französische Sprache (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die kroatische Sprache (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die polnische Sprache (PL) ( ABl. C 72 A vom 5.3.2020 ) | 1 |

Inhalt

Seite

Berichtigungen

2020/C 123 A/01

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die dänische Sprache (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die griechische Sprache (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die französische Sprache (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die kroatische Sprache (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die polnische Sprache (PL) ( ABl. C 72 A vom 5.3.2020 )

( ABl. C 72 A vom 5.3.2020 )

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

Berichtigungen

| 16.4.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 123/1

---

Berichtigung der Bekanntmachung allgemeiner Auswahlverfahren — EPSO/AD/375/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die dänische Sprache (DA) — EPSO/AD/376/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die griechische Sprache (EL) — EPSO/AD/377/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die französische Sprache (FR) — EPSO/AD/378/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die kroatische Sprache (HR) — EPSO/AD/379/20 — Rechts- und Sprachsachverständige (m/w) (AD 7) für die polnische Sprache (PL)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 72 A vom 5. März 2020
  )

(2020/C 123 A/01)

Auf Seite 1:

Anstatt:

„Bewerbungsschluss: 7. April 2020 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Ortszeit Brüssel“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bewerbungsschluss: 5. Mai 2020 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Ortszeit Brüssel“.

Auf Seite 6:

Anstatt:

Anstatt:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu bis zum

7. April 2020 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Ortszeit Brüssel“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„Bewerben Sie sich online über die EPSO-Website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu bis zum

5. Mai 2020 um 12.00 Uhr (mittags), Ortszeit Brüssel“.

---
---

**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of MC Shipping Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form
      10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):





The
      undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







March
                  30, 2007
              
              /S/
                  DOMINIQUE SERGENTDominique
                  SergentChief
                  Financial Officer