alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Yanca, Catherine

To: Yanca, Catherine

Subject: RE: Response to 2/25 EO 12866 Comments - Tier 3

Date: Friday, May 17, 2013 1:32:38 PM

From: Sargeant, Kathryn

Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:25 AM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Charmley, William; Stewart, Lori; Ghanta, Venu; Jutras, Nathaniel; Nickerson, William; Nagelhout,

Peter; Brunner, Christine

Subject: RE: Response to 2/25 EO 12866 Comments - Tier 3

The regulatory text related to Part 1065 was not included in the original submission (and therefore

shows up as redline now) because of issues with formatting and proper amendatory language.

However, as described in the preamble you have been reviewing (Section IV.D and IV.F, with a

scattering of additional references in other parts of the preamble), we are proposing changes to

existing CFR language; Part 1065 itself is not new. I am pasting in a preamble excerpt:

“The proposal also includes various technical amendments to 40 CFR part 1065. The proposed

technical amendments have no effect on the stringency of the regulations. These revisions include

several minor changes to clarify regulatory requirements, align with chassis-testing procedures

where appropriate, and correct typographical errors.”

We would be happy to provide a version of Part 1065 that shows changes from the existing CFR in

redline, if that would be helpful.

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:41 PM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Cc: Charmley, William; Stewart, Lori; Ghanta, Venu; Jutras, Nathaniel; Nickerson, William; Nagelhout,

Peter; Brunner, Christine

Subject: RE: Response to 2/25 EO 12866 Comments - Tier 3

Thank you for the responses. Concerning the additions to the package, the entire section of Part

1065 is redlined (80 pages). Is this all new language or just parts of it?

From: Sargeant, Kathryn [ mailto:sargeant.kathryn@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:05 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad

Cc: Charmley, William; Stewart, Lori; Ghanta, Venu; Jutras, Nathaniel; Nickerson, William; Nagelhout,

Peter; Brunner, Christine

Subject: Response to 2/25 EO 12866 Comments - Tier 3

Attached please find responses to the comments from 2/25, including responses to both the

summary comments and the comment balloons that were inserted in the preamble.

We are also including a new version of the preamble and RIA (with changes tracked) that includes

edits in response to your comments, as well as edits we have made to the package to seek

comment on some additional program design details and to make various corrections.From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:01 AM

To: Sargeant, Kathryn

Subject: EO 12866 Comments - Tier 3

Hi Kathryn,

Attached are some additional EO 12866 comments on Tier 3. I know that there are more coming

and will get them to you as soon as possible.

Regards,

Chad
#### STATE ex rel. Robert T. TURNER v. Hon. John M. MAMOULIDES, 24th Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson.

No. 86-KH-0862.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Turner, Robert T.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 76-2524.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 10.26



Official translation from Italian language



VIVAI VIVEROS MARCHI



SALES CONTRACT



The VIVAI MARCHI Company, 10, Zotutti Str., RAUSCEDO PN ITALIA, in the person of Mr. Marchi Ezio, the representative of said enterprise, on the one part; the Company
ASCONI S.R.L., in the person of Mr. ANATOLIE SIRBU, the chief financial officer of said enterprise, on the other part; have agreed on the following:



VIVAI MARCHI undertakes to sell to the ASCONI S.R.L. following commodities in accordance with conditions stated below:



Description of Commodities: Certified engrafted seedlings.



Quantities envisaged for the season of 2004:



|                                           |  |           
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------
|- CABERNET, SAUVIGNON various clones X SO4 |  | n. 367382-
|- GAMAY FREAUX (OR OTHER TINTURIER) SO4    |  | n. 18592- 
|- MERLOT various clones X SO4              |  | n. 48016- 
|- CHARDONNAY various clones SO4            |  | n. 57211- 



Transportation shall be performed on the Buyers account on or before 31.03.2004.

Unit Price: Euro 1,00.
Excluding customs and import duties.



Plants shall be preserved by
paraffination with roots cut up to +/- 8cm and wrapped in packing for prolonged storage.



Payments:



|- | Commodities of 2004:
|- | --------------------



|                                                             |  |             
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------
|Payment of 10% to enterprise the contract is concluded with: |  | Euro 49.120 
|Advance payment of 75% for delivery of plants                |  | Euro 368.401
|Final balance of 15% till 30.06.2004                         |  | Euro 73.680 



The present Contract becomes valid
following its signing by above indicated parties.



Besides special conditions
provided above, the contract is made on the basis of general sales conditions disclosed on the back side of the present contract and applied to commercial operations of the E.U.R.L. Pepinieres Viticoles Philippe Dayde and Vivai Marchi of Mr. Marchi
Ezio.



Dated : December 7, 2003



|                     |  |                     
|-------------------- |  | --------------------
|VIVAI MARCHI         |  | SRL ASCONI          
|                     | 
|/s/ Marchi Ezio      |  | /s/ Anatolie Sirbu  
|Marchi Ezio          |  | Anatolie Sirbu      
|Authorized Signature |  | Authorized Signature



Payments shall be made in conformity
with following banking requisites: BANCA POPOLARE FRIULADRIA  AGENZIA DI SPILIMBERGO - ABAN 1163 C053 3665 0310 0000 0351 399



Contract is made and signed in three copies.



VIVAI MARCHI de Marchi Ezio

Str. P. Zorutti,
10 - 33090 Rauscedo (PN) - Part. Iva 00627010937- Telefon 0427.94756 - Fax 0427.94722

E-mail: info@vivaimarchi.com 
www.vivaimarchi.com
Exhibit
21.1





Subsidiaries
of the Registrant





Allion
Healthcare, Inc. and Subsidiaries:





Allion
Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation





Moms
Pharmacy, Inc., a California corporation





Medicine
Made Easy, a California corporation


d/b/a:
MOMS Pharmacy; Priority Pharmacy, Whittier Pharmacy





Moms
Pharmacy, Inc., a New York corporation





Mail
Order Meds of Florida, LLC, a Florida limited liability company


d/b/a:
MOMS Specialty Care Pharmacy





North
American Home Health Supply, Inc., a California corporation





Specialty
Pharmacies, Inc., a Washington corporation


d/b/a:
Castro Street Pharmacy; Cherry Street Pharmacy; Castro and Duboce Pharmacy;
2nd
Street Pharmacy





Oris
Health, Inc., a California corporation


d/b/a:
Oris Medical Systems





Moms
Pharmacy of Brooklyn, Inc., a New York corporation


d/b/a:
Maiman’s Pharmacy
#### Earline ESPINOSA v. ARVIN INDUSTRIES and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company.

No. 58223.

Thomas J. Lowe, Jr., Jackson, William S. Lawson, Tupelo, for appellant.

Dennis W. Voge, Mitchell, Voge, Beasley & Corban, Tupelo, for appellees.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 11, 1989.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; Fred Wicker, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE ex rel. John GRAY, Jr. a/k/a Lionel Jenkins v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS, SECTION “J”.

No. 87-KH-0126.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Gray, John a/k/a; Jenkins, Lionel; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 241-091.

Granted. The district court is ordered to comply with this Court’s September 19, 1986 order in 86-KH-1548 to furnish a Boykin transcript by June 14, 1987.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000766 09-NOV-2018 09:14 AM
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of NYMAGIC, INC.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report.
 August 12, 2009
    /s/ Thomas J. IacopelliThomas J. IacopelliChief Financial Officer
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate D istrict of Texas at Fort Wor th

_____ ______________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00385

- CV

___________________________

On Appea l from County Court at La w N o. 1 Tar rant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021

- 005304

- 1
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum O pinion 

### R

USSELL 

### M AIR 

### , Appellant

V


### . A RTURO 

### L OZANO 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND J UDGMENT
Before the court is Appellee A rturo Lozan o ’s motion to dismiss Appellant
Russ ell Mair ’ s appeal

. Attached to the motion and fil ed with the clerk of this court is

a document signed by both parties in which they agreed to dismiss the appeal

. Appellant did not respond to the m otion. Se e Chan Il Pak v . Ad Villarai, LLC , No. 05

- 17

- 01 182

- CV, 2019 WL 1090407, at *1 (T ex. App.

— Da llas Mar. 8, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) ( dismissing appeal where an appellee filed a motion to dismiss along with a signed agreement to dismiss the appeal a nd the ap pe llan t did not respond to the motion)

. In acc ordance with an agreement signed by the part ies or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, we may render judgment e ffectuating the parties ’ agreemen t
. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (a)( 2 ) (A) ; Fusion Indus. , LLC v. E dg a rdo Madrid & Assoc s. , LLC , 624 S.W.3d 843, 84 9 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 2021, no pet .)

. This court is of the opinion that the motion should be gra nted. Accordingly,

w e d ismiss the appeal. S e e T ex. R . A p p. P. 43.2(f). All costs are taxed against
A pp ellant

. Se e Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 ( d )

. P er Curiam
Deli vered: February 3, 2022
** **

** **

 

 

 

 

** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven D. Hunt, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

|                   |   |                                    |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:                    |   | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|  

 

  |   |                                    |
|                   |   | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: April4, 2008
Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT FOF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 10, 2010
    /s/ Michael H. LeeMichael H. LeePresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2010
    /s/ William E. HitselbergerWilliam E. HitselbergerSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
#### Autley B. NEWTON, et al. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN RESOURCES, OFFICE of MENTAL HEALTH, HAMMOND MENTAL HEALTH CENTER.

No. 89-C-0711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Newton, Autley B.; Newton, Aut-ley B. Ill; Newton, David Walker; Gilham, *902Laura Claire Newton; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA87 1011; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 78817.

Prior report: La.App., 536 So.2d 560.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 341

Authorizing the printing of certain materials in honor of Paul Coverdell

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 24 (legislative day, JULY 21), 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the printing of certain materials in honor of

Paul Coverdell

1 Resolved, That the eulogies and other related mate2 rials concerning the Honorable Paul Coverdell, late a Sen3 ator from the State of Georgia, be printed as a Senate

4 Document.

Æ
#### Humberto BANOS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-253.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

*303Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ralph Barreira, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HENDRY, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged by information with three counts of armed robbery, one count of armed kidnapping, one count of possession of a firearm while engaged in the commission of a felony and one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Pursuant to a motion by the defendant, the convicted felon firearm count was severed. When the jury retired to deliberate at the close of the trial on the remaining counts, they were permitted to take with them a copy of the information. One page of the document contained a reference to the severed count. The jurors inquired of the court during their deliberations whether they should have been given the page containing the reference to this count. Defense counsel stated a curative instruction would be insufficient to cure the taint, and moved for a mistrial, which the court denied. Pursuant to the jury’s verdict of guilty as charged on all five counts, the court adjudicated the defendant guilty and imposed sentence. The defendant’s motion for new trial, again raising the issue of undue influence upon the jury from the improper reference to the severed count in the information submitted to them, was denied.

On appeal the defendant urges reversal of his conviction and sentences on the ground that the trial court erred in denying his motions for mistrial and for new trial after the jury inadvertently learned of the severed convicted felon charge, which could not properly have been introduced in evidence. We find merit in this contention and reverse.

It is clearly apparent from the record in this case that the jurors, having noted the reference to the severed convicted felon count in the information submitted to them, were subjected to an extraneous influence in their deliberations, which we hold was fundamentally improper. The law is well settled that where jurors cpnsider matters not in evidence, to the prejudice of a defendant, a new trial is mandated. *Russ v. State,*95 So.2d 594, 601 (Fla.1957); *Meixelsperger v. State,*423 So.2d 416 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); *Nelson v. State,*362 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction and sentences and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Refund Processing Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, February 2, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (414) 231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Refund Processing Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, February 2, 2012 at 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-(888) 912-1227 or (414) 231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2012-762 Filed 1-17-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Main Street and Main Incorporated
Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     Name of Subsidiaries                         State of Incorporation
     --------------------                         ----------------------
Main St. Hospitality, Inc.                               Arizona
Main Entertainment, Inc.                                 Arizona
Cornerstone Production, Inc.                            Delaware
Main St. Northwest, Inc.                                 Arizona
Fiddlesticks, Inc.                                       Arizona
Main St. California, Inc.                                Arizona
Main St. Midwest, Inc.                                   Arizona
Main St. El Paso, Inc.                                   Arizona
Main St./Cornerstone Texas, Inc.                           Texas
Main St. Louisiana Restaurants, Inc.                     Arizona
#### YAMA WOODCRAFT, INC., d/b/a Cal-Pacific Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Toni ASPRODITES d/b/a Toni Asprodites Interiors.

No. 88-CC-0134.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Toni Asprodites d/b/a; Toni Aspro-dites Interiors; applying for writ of certio-rari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-8878; Parish of Orleans, First City Court of New Orleans, Div. “B”, No. 299-599.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant and reverse the Court of Appeal.