alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I,
Lawrence Burstein, certify that:
  1)
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trinity Partners
      Acquisition Company Inc. (the “Registrant”);
  2)
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;
  3)
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
  4)
    The
      Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:
  a)
    designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
  b)
    evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
    disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
  5)
    The
      Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s
      board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)
    all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)
    any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
  
 /s/
      Lawrence BursteinLawrence
      BursteinPresident
      and Treasurer
      (Principal Financial
      Officer)May
      20, 2005
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)





OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EPL Intermediate, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
E. Carley, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





Date: May
17, 2010





/s/ Stephen E. CarleyStephen
      E. CarleyPresidentEPL
      Intermediate, Inc.





This
certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not
for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to EPL Intermediate, Inc. and will be retained by
EPL Intermediate, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 299

To make technical corrections to the Standing Rules of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 2000

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. DODD) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To make technical corrections to the Standing Rules of the

Senate.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. DATE CHANGES.

3 Each of the recommended forms in paragraph 3 of

4 rule II of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended

5 by striking ‘‘19’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘20’’.

6 SEC. 2. CORRECTIONS.

7 (a) INCORRECT ORDER.—Rule XXV of the Standing

8 Rules of the Senate is amended—

9 (1) in paragraph 1, by redesignating subpara10 graphs (l) and (m) as subparagraphs (m) and (l), re11 spectively; and
2

•SRES 299 ATS

1 (2) in paragraph 2, by moving the item relating

2 to the Committee on the Judiciary to the end of the

3 list.

4 (b) NAME CORRECTION.—Paragraph 5(b) of rule

5 XXXVII of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended

6 by inserting ‘‘Select’’ before ‘‘Committee on Ethics’’.

7 (c) CROSS REFERENCE.—Paragraph 6(d) of rule

8 XLI of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by

9 striking ‘‘11’’ and inserting ‘‘12’’.

Æ
Sherry Oakman 100 Singletree Stockbridge, GA 30281-4858 March 7, 2010
The Honorable RayLaHood SecretaryofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
Re: Retirees Support Delta's Haneda Application

- 

### keep the USA a Global Participant
Dear Secretary LaHood: Delta Air Lines has snbmitted an application to provide new nonstop service from the U.S. to Tokyo's Haneda airport. As a retired employee ofDelta, I enthusiastically support

### this application. Underthe new aviation agreement with Japan, Haneda will be reopened to U.S. carriers for the final time since 1976. Because ofits convenient locationnear centralTokyo, Haneda is the preferred airport for business travelers. Delta employees, and many ofits retirees, have worked for many years to build Delta's business in Japan, and no U.S. 

### airline has invested more in Tokyo than Delta. Delta 

### has a strong record ofcompetitive trans-Pacific service. 

### Dutthe reopening ofHaneda 

### will putthatinvestment and Deltajobs atrisk 

### ifthey are unable to compete. Delta's major competitors, the Star and oneworld Alliances, .l\ave Japanese partners that dominate service at 

### Haneda. Delta, which does nothave a Japanese partner, would be at a serious disadvantage unless it is given the opportunity to compete at Haneda. IfDelta 

### is provided with the Haneda slots they 

### need. all three ofthe 

### major airline alliances· SkyTeam, Star and oneworld • will be able to compete on a level playing field. 

### that 

### new competition would provide tremendous benefits for Delta's customers and Delta's employees. I urge you to approve Delta's application and provide the frequencies proposedto serve Hanedafrom Seattle, Detroit, Los 

### Adge1es andHonolUlu
.. Sincerely,

# .~O~

... :Sherry Oakman

770·954-0166
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 41 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 41

Expressing the gratitude of the United States Senate for the service of 
 Francis L. Burk, Jr., Legislative Counsel of the United States Senate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1999

    Mr. Thurmond (for himself, Mr. Lott, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Byrd, Mr. 
Stevens, Mr. Warner, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Sarbanes, Mr. Bennett, 
 Mr. Dodd, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Mack, and 
 Mr. Bunning) submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the gratitude of the United States Senate for the service of 
 Francis L. Burk, Jr., Legislative Counsel of the United States Senate.

Whereas Francis L. ``Frank'' Burk, Jr., the Legislative Counsel of the United 
        States Senate, became an employee of the Senate on June 8, 1970, and 
        since that date has ably and faithfully upheld the high standards and 
        traditions of the Office of the Legislative Counsel of the United States 
        Senate for more than 28 years;
Whereas Frank Burk, from January 1, 1991, to December 31, 1998, served as the 
        Legislative Counsel of the Senate and demonstrated great dedication, 
        professionalism, and integrity in faithfully discharging the duties and 
        responsibilities of his position;
Whereas Frank Burk for more than 25 years was the primary drafter in the Senate 
        of virtually all legislation relating to banking, securities, housing, 
        mass transit, and small business, and as Legislative Counsel 
        participated in the drafting of legislation relating to the operations 
        and rules of the Senate;
Whereas Frank Burk retired on December 31, 1998, after more than 30 years of 
        Government service, including 2 years with the United States Army; and
Whereas Frank Burk has met the legislative drafting needs of the United States 
        Senate with unfailing professionalism, skill, dedication, and good humor 
        during his entire career: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the United States Senate commends Francis L. Burk, 
Jr. for his more than 30 years of faithful and exemplary service to the 
United States Senate and the Nation, including 8 years as the 
Legislative Counsel of the Senate, and expresses its deep appreciation 
and gratitude for his long, faithful, and outstanding service.
    Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to Francis L. Burk, Jr.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned officers of El Pollo Loco, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certify that to the best of their
knowledge:



(i) the Form 10-Q of the Company
(the Report) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:
November 15, 2004



/s/ Stephen E. CarleyStephen E. CarleyChief Executive Officer/s/ Joseph SteinJoseph SteinChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Richard J. Carbone, Chief Financial
Officer of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, hereby certify that the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
containing the financial statements of The Prudential Variable Contract Real
Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance Company of
America) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the
"Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account and The
Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.

Date: March 27, 2003


                                        /s/ Richard J. Carbone
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Name:  Richard J. Carbone
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer



     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of NeuroMetrix, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies to his knowledge that the Company's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ SHAI N. GOZANI, M.D., PH.D. Shai N. Gozani, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ THOMAS T. HIGGINS Thomas T. Higgins Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


August 10,
2010

This
certification is being furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated into any document
for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

---



QuickLinks
#### William Lynn JACKSON a/k/a Larry Jackson v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58098.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Jan. 11, 1989.

Appeal from Circuit Court, DeSoto County; George C. Carlson, Jr., Judge.

*1363Clay Vanderburg, Hernando, for appellant.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by DeWitt Allred, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

En Banc.

AFFIRMED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.

PITTMAN, J., not participating.
#### The COLORADO AIR QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION; et al, Petitioners, v. CF & I STEEL CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. 81 SC 288.

Supreme Court of Colorado.

May 2, 1983.

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the Motion and Agreement to Dismiss Appeal filed herein, and now being sufficiently advised in the premises,

*489It Is This Day Ordered that said Motion shall be, and the same hereby is, Granted, and this Petition for Certiorari is Dismissed and the matter Remanded to the Court of Appeals for any further proceedings.
Memorandum

u.s,tHIportment 0.1

TrcxmportaHon

Office oflhe Secre...•,ry

C4lron~pOnallO'"l

Subject: Notice of Communication in case:

Docket-OST -2013-0204

Date: October 21, 2014

From: The Secretary ~

Reply to

Attn. of:

To: Chief, Dockets

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the following

communication.

On January 10,2014, during a telephone call with Congresswoman Grace Napolitano of

California, the Congresswoman raised the subject of the Department's proceeding to

consider Norwegian Air International's foreign air carrier permit application. She

expressed her opposition to the application.

I explained that while 1 appreciated the Congresswoman's interest in this matter, I could

not comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the

Department.

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket.

cc: Congresswoman Grace Napolitano
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 11309 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

SCOTT BRANDON HUTCHESON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:14

- CR

- 59

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Scott Brandon Hutcheson appeals the sentence following his guilty plea
conviction for aiding and abetting the transportation of child pornography

. Hutcheson maintains that the district court plainly erred in its relevant
conduct determin ation . He contends that the district court should not have
treated his prior uploading to YouTube of a video involving child pornography
as relevant conduct that could be used to determine the number of images

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 31, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-11309 Document: 00513136783 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/31/2015No. 14

- 11309

2 involved in th is offense for purposes of a n enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(b)(7)(A ). The record reflects that the previous uploading of the video
and the instant offense both involved the transportation of child pornography,
concerned images of young boys, and shared a modus operandi of electronically transmitting child pornography over the inte r n e t to appear on social

- media
websites. B ecause the prior uploading of the video w as connected to the instant offense by at least on e common factor, it was part of a “common scheme or plan”
and was relevant conduct for purposes of the Sentencing Guidelines. See
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(2). Hutcheson therefore cannot show clear or obvious error by the district court. See Puckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 1 29, 135 (2009). Furthermore, Hutcheson argues that the district court erred in requiring
that he submit to plethysmograph testing as a special condition of supervised
release. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent, but he raises it to preserve it for further appellate review. Hutcheson is correct that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Ellis , 72 0 F.3d 220, 227 (5th Cir. ) , cert. denied , 134 S. Ct. 681 (2013) , which held that a defendant ’s challenge to a supervised release condition requiring him to participate in a sex offender treatment program , which included the possibility of submitting to psycho

- physiological testing , was not ripe for review on direct appeal . A panel of this court may not overrule the decision of another without en banc reconsideration or a superseding Supreme Court decision. United States v. Lipscomb , 299 F.3d 303, 313 & n.34 (5th Cir. 2002).
AFFIRMED. Case: 14-11309 Document: 00513136783 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/31/2015
EXHIBIT 31.1



Certification



I, Stephen E. Carley, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of El Pollo Loco, Inc. (the Company);



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The Companys other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):



(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  |                                          
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 13, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Stephen E. Carley
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                          |  | Stephen E. Carley Chief Executive
Officer