alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC Virgin i a One Development, INC, Avery Park Partners, LLC d/b/a A very Park, DSH Diplomat, LLC d/b/a Diplomat Townhomes, Colony Creek, LLC, and Crossings Townhomes, LLC, Complainants/ Appellant


### v. The City of Atlanta, Georgia, Respondent

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME FAA Docket 16

- 12-09

This matter i s before the Fede ral Avi at io n Adm i nistra t ion (FAA) based on the above

referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 1 4 CFR , Part 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR, Part 1 6, s ubpart B, the date by which the F inal Agency Decision will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to on or about November 30, 2015
. An exten sion of t ime is necessary in r esponse to a notification to the Associate Administrator that the parties to this proceeding are involved in settlement negotiations that may lead to a resolut ion of this matter .

Eduardo A. Angeles

### ~t?-v Associate Admi nistrator

for Airports

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


### I HEREBY CERTIFY tha t on 

# g -

**:)/**

**I** caused to be placed i n the United States mail (first class mail , postage paid) a tr u e copy of the Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: Counsel for Complainant Steven M. Tab e r Taber Law Group , P.C. 1 League, #60036 Irvi ne, CA 92602-0036 staber@taberlaw. com Counsel for Respondent Eric N. Heyer THOMPSON HINE LLP 1919 M StreetN.W. , Suite 700 Wash i ngton, DC 20036 Eric
. He yer @ thompsonhine.com John L. Watkins Roy E. Hadley , Jr. THOMPSON HINE LLP Two Alliance Center 3560 Lenox R oad , Suite 1600 Atlanta, GA 30326-2905 John. Watkin s@thompsonhine.com Roy
. Had ley@thompsonh ine . com Hand Delivered to: FAA Part 16 A i rport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analys i s , AC0

- 1 00 FAA Eastern Region , AEA

- 600



# I Claudi a Roberts Airport Compliance and Management

Analysis
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-12254 and 333-10668 of Repsol YPF, S.A. on Form F-3 of ourreport dated April 1, 2005 (except for Notes 24 and 27, as to which the date is June 28, 2005) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the uncertainty regarding the regulatory and economicsituation in Bolivia), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Repsol YPF, S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

DELOITTE, S.L. 

 

/S/  DELOITTE, S.L. 

 

Madrid, Spain

 

June 28, 2005
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 212

To designate August 1, 2000, as ‘‘National Relatives as Parents Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 1, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

To designate August 1, 2000, as ‘‘National Relatives as

Parents Day’’.

Whereas children are this Nation’s most valuable resource;

Whereas the most important responsibility for this Nation’s

lawmakers and citizens is the protection and care of children;

Whereas in order to ensure the future success of this Nation,

children must be taught values that will help them lead

happy, healthy, and productive lives;

Whereas the family unit is most suitable to provide the special care and attention needed by children;

Whereas this year, many children will suffer from child

abuse, neglect, poor nutrition, and insufficient child care,

all of which jeopardize the well-being of young children
2

•SRES 212 IS

and the opportunity for a fulfilling and successful adulthood;

Whereas extended family members, willing to open their

hearts and homes to children whose immediate families

are in crises, play an indispensable role in helping those

children heal by providing them with a stable and secure

environment in which they can grow and develop;

Whereas approximately 520,000 children are currently under

the care and guidance of foster parents—about 150,800,

or 29 percent, of whom are children living in foster

homes with extended family members who care for these

children and provide them with a positive home environment; and

Whereas ‘‘National Relatives as Parents Day’’ is an appropriate occasion to recognize the dedication, compassion,

and selflessness of extended family members who willingly assume the often thankless responsibility of providing a relative child with a family and home: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) designates August 1, 2000, as ‘‘National

3 Relatives as Parents Day’’; and

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation calling on the people of the United States to

6 observe ‘‘National Relatives as Parents Day’’ with

7 appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL**

**EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the*"Report"*), I, Brenton W. Hatch , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.            Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date:  | November 14, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ Brenton W. Hatch    |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   |   | Brenton W. Hatch        |   |
|   |              |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|        |                   |        |        |                         |        |  |
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary license has been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued019778F
FT Worldwide, LLC, 2979 Rushland Road, Jamison, PA 18929
January 23, 2012.
 Vern W. Hill, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2012-7457 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
August 8, 2013

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief ofthe EAS Division Aviation Analysis 1200New Jersey Ave SE Washington D.C. 20590 RE: Essential Air Service Application

- Moab, Utah/Canyonlands Airport Dear Mr. DeVany: Thank you fortaking the time to read my letter and consider my position onthe matter ofair service to and from Moab Utah, and specifically Essential Air Service and what itmeans to our community and the region. 1believe that SkyWestlDelta has the res0!Jfces and capability to address several concerns and major areas ofimportance that would significantly impact the region, whereas Great Lakes Airlines has proven inadequate. Reliability has been and continues to be asignificant challenge for Great Lakes Airlines. Frequently cancelling flights tor avanety ofreljSons creating extreme difficulty forpassengers and motivates businesses torecommend alternative modes oftransport, primarily driving. SkyWest has abetter record ofreliability and multiple standby aircraft to complete service when something unforeseen happens instead ofcancelling flights. The connection between Denver and Moab is almost zero. Great Lakes hub isDenver, but there isminimal connection inbusiness, tourism, orpersonal travel with Denver. SkyWest's hub is Salt Lake City where the connection between there and Moab is significant. Amore viable connection for tourists from Erope and Asia through Delta inSalt Lake City, family travelers to and from Salt Lake, and business travelers. The majority of travel to Moab isvia automobile because there isno alternative. The Delta umbrella would create credibility and security inknowing that the flight will be ontime and not get cancelled. The ease ofbooking and travel would be greatly increased. The ability for travelers to get into and out of Moab the same day would be as close to guaranteed as possible. Ibelieve the change to SkyWest from Great Lakes would increase our enplanements and boost economic growth inthe region. SkyWest under the Delta umbrella provides alarger aircraft which means that area businesses could, with confidence, encourage and book larger groups to come to the Moab area with confidence knowing they will gethere and leave when planned. 1strongly recommend approving the SkyWestlDeltaproposal forEAS atCanyorilands Airport.
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek  Oil  Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB/A for  the  quarter  ended June  30, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 2, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cogent, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Ming Hsieh, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification
has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dated: August 7, 2009



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ MING HSIEH                       
|Ming Hsieh                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,762,386
<SECURITIES>                                   162,273
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,995,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,920,468
<PP&E>                                      13,565,114
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,395,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,089,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,763,008
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,326,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,089,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,366,220
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,785,477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                580,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            580,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   580,743
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 18
- 00316
- CV
IN THE MATTER OF M.T .F.
- S.

From the County Court at Law Coryell County, Texas Trial Court No. 18
- 2333

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court, sitting as a juvenile court, signed an order waiving jurisdiction over this case and transferring Appellant M.T.F.

- S., a seventeen

- year - old juvenile, to district

court. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN
. § 54.02 (West 2014 ) . Appellant subsequently filed a notice of appeal. See id. § 56.01(c) (West Supp. 2018 ). We eventually abated the appeal because Appellant had not responded to any of our correspondence. The abatement order stated: [T]he Court abates this cause to the trial court for a hearin g to determine: (1) why the Court has received no response from Appellant; (2) whether Appellant still desires to proceed with this appeal; (3) whether Appellant’s attorney has abandoned the appeal; and (4) whether the appointment of an attorney to repres ent Appellant in this appeal is necessary. The trial court held a hearing, and we have received a supplemental reporter’s record from the hearing. At the hearing, Appellant’s right to appeal was validly waivedI n the Matter of M.T.F.

- S. Page 2

under section 51.09 of the Texas Family Code

. See id. § 51.09 (West 2014 ). The waiver was made by Appellant and her attorney; Appellant and her attorney were informed of and understood the right and the possible consequences of waiving it; the waiver was voluntary , and the waiver was made in court proceedings that were recorded. See id. No written motion to dismiss has been filed in this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1. However, we believe that good cause exists to implement Rule 2 to suspend the operation
of Rule 42.1 in this case. See id. R. 2

. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See In re
B.K.M. , No. 01

- 02

- 00827

- CV, 2003 WL 360935, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 13, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing juvenile’s appeal following hearing in juvenile court where juvenile v alidly waived right to appeal under section 51.09).

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Senior Justice Scoggins 1 Appeal dismissed Opini on delivered and filed February 13, 2019 [CV06]

1 The Honorable Al Scoggins, Senior Justice of the Tenth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment of the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. §§ 74.003, 75.002, 75.003 (West 2013).
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of American Cordillera Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended May 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank H. Blair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: October 20, 2014

|  

By:

/s/ Frank H. Blair

 

 

Frank H. Blair

 

 

President, CEO, Director |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132255 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132255 

 COA: 261560 

Wayne CC: 04-011761-01

CARLOS RICO DULEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2010 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Hunt,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: January 7, 2011
#### Leon Gayous RHEA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-82-519.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Aug. 26, 1983.

Thomas & Gile, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Robert W. Cole, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

The appellant, Leon Gayous Rhea, was convicted in the Caddo County District Court, Case No. CRF-81-78, of Murder in the Second Degree and was sentenced to the minimum penalty of ten (10) years, from which he now appeals. As his sole assignment of error the appellant asserts that the trial court erred in failing to instruct on manslaughter in the first degree and other lesser included offenses.

On May 17, 1981, the defendant and friends spent the afternoon playing frisbee and enjoying the sunshine at Red Rock Canyon State Park. At a picnic table, not far from defendant’s group, the decedent, Ronnie Goodblanket, was drinking beer with Kenneth Shrader and Shrader’s son. Mr. Goodblanket asked a young woman in the group if he knew her and harsh words were exchanged between the parties. Mr. Shrader, enraged over jokes about his weight, tore open his shirt, broke a beer bottle on the table to form a weapon and headed for the defendant. Shrader was followed by his son and Mr. Goodblanket; both men carried beer bottles. The defendant’s group hurriedly left the area and ran for the defendant’s ear. When defendant reached his car he pulled a gun from the seat, fired two (2) shots in the ground and said, “please leave us alone, we’re leaving.” The defendant was attempting to leave when a bottle struck the car. He then stopped the car, got out and fired four (4) more shots and then drove out of the area. One of the bullets that the defendant fired hit Mr. Goodblanket in the head and he died soon thereafter from the injury. The deputy sheriff of Caddo County testified that upon learning of Mr. Goodblanket’s death, the defendant said, “I didn’t mean to shoot *1165the son of a bitch and kill him, but he shouldn’t have hit my car with a beer bottle.”

The appellant relies upon the case of *Tarter*v. *State,*359 P.2d 596 (Okl.Cr.1961), and urges that it is the trial court’s duty to instruct on manslaughter when any evidence supports the offense regardless of whether the defense counsel requested the instruction or not. However, in the instant case, the defense counsel not only did not object to the lack of a manslaughter instruction he specifically stated he had no requests. The record reveals that after the defense counsel objected to the definition of “depraved mind” in Instruction No. 4, the court then asked:

> THE COURT: Any other objections? Overruled on that point, gentlemen.

> MR. BLACK: It’s the only objection we have to the instructions, your honor. We ask an exception, please, to that.

> THE COURT: You have an exception. No requested instructions?

> MR. BLACK: No.

> THE COURT: No request for any lesser included instruction?

> MR. BLACK: No sir.

We therefore find that appellant effectively waived his right to allege error on appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

CORNISH, J., concurs in results.

BRETT, J., concurs.