alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
     STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         310,288
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,671,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (376,117)
<INVENTORY>                                    3,440,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,721,992<F1>
<PP&E>                                         1,971,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,208,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,677,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,219,449
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,381
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,456,142<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,677,972
<SALES>                                        33,066,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               33,066,831
<CGS>                                          23,864,836
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  23,864,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,650,835<F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             355,816<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,195,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                   460,941
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            734,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                 21,545<F5>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   755,948
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .36
<FN>
<F1> AMOUNT REPRESENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.
<F2> INCLUDES THE COST OF 392,750 OF COMMON SHARES IN TREASURY OF $1,195,247.
<F3> INCLUDES A SPECIAL CREDIT OF $56,711 FROM THE REVERSAL OF PREVIOUSLY 
RECORDED CHANGES (SEE NOTE 2 TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS).
<F4> INCLUDES INTEREST EXPENSE OF $359,712, INTEREST INCOME OF $19,840 AND
OTHER EXPENSE OF $15,944.
<F5> AMOUNT REPRESENTS THE REVERSAL OF PREVIOUSLY RECORDED CHARGES (SEE 
FOOTNOTE 2 TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







In
connection with the Annual Report of MC Shipping Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):







I, Antony
Crawford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.







March 18 ,
2005







Antony
      CrawfordChief
      Executive Officer
** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven D. Hunt, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

    a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

    b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

    c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

    a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

    b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: April 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary information extracted from the consolidated
balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              mar-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   mar-31-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,121,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,858,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,094,329
<PP&E>                                         790,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                 568,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,807,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,817,287
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    376,593
<COMMON>                                       10,013,334
<OTHER-SE>                                     (10,503,293)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,807,589
<SALES>                                        6,444,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,444,586
<CGS>                                          3,761,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,869,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (150,724)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             267,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,303,546)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,303,546)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,303,546)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.08)
        


</TABLE>
#### ST. ANDREWS LINKS, INC., a Florida corporation; and W.L. Matthew Enterprises, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellants, v. The CITY OF DUNEDIN, a Florida municipal corporation; Mary Bonner, Mayor of the City of Dunedin; Manuel Koutsourais, David F. Ramsey, Donald R. Shaffer, Jack Cella, City Commissioners; The Dunedin Country Club, Inc., a Florida corporation; The Professional Golfers’ Association of America, Inc., a Florida corporation; Union Trust, a Florida corporation; The Contract and Investment Company, a Florida corporation; Oak Ridge Golf Center, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 86-2702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 3, 1987.

Sidney L. Matthew of Gorman & Matthew, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellants.

Anne Williams and John G. Hubbard of Frazer, Hubbard, Brandt & Williams, Dunedin, for appellees.

*39PER CURIAM.

We conclude that appellant landowners, who do not contest the facial constitutionality of the city ordinance involved in this case, have failed to show the lack of any rational nexus between the impact fee imposed under that ordinance by the City and a planned residential development on appellants’ land. *See Wald Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County,*338 So.2d 863 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). We find no merit in the other contention on appeal which is to the effect that a prior stipulation between the parties, which did not refer to such a fee, should be construed to preclude the fee.

Affirmed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32**





The
      undersigned in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Registrant do hereby certify that:





(i)
      this
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii)
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of,
      and
      for, the periods presented in the report.





Date:
      March 5, 2008





By:
            /s/ John F. Norris Jr.John
                F. Norris Jr.Chief
                Executive Officer, President and
                Director





Date:
      March 5, 2008





By:
            /s/ Vincent J. ArnoneVincent
                J. ArnoneChief
                Financial Officer,Senior
                Vice President and Treasurer




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") this certification
      accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent required by the
      Act,
      be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Fuel Tech Inc. and will be retained by
      Fuel
      Tech, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE FINANCE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 10, 2010
            /s/
      Yizhao ZhangYizhao
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1
                      OFFER TO PURCHASE BUSINESS AND STOCK
                      ------------------------------------

         ALLIED MED INC., Oregon corporation ("Buyer") offers to purchase all
shares and business assets including but not limited to, equipment, inventory,
customer lists, and books and records of DERMAGEN, INC., a California
corporation, from Praku "Mike" Charu represents 100% shareholders ("Seller") on
the following terms:

         1.       Sale to be through Escrow. Parties to open escrow with a
                  recognized reputable business escrow company in Los Angeles or
                  Orange County. Customary escrow instructions to be signed in
                  accordance with the terms of this Agreement, Escrow to close
                  30 days from opening, parties to split escrow fees equally;

         2.       Price to be One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars $120,000.00
                  payable at close of escrow less escrow fees and any approved
                  adjustments.

         3.       Contingencies. Sale and close of escrow subject to Buyer's
                  written approval of the following contingencies (time computed
                  from date Escrow is opened). Seller to cooperate with Buyer's
                  inspection and appraiser, Buyer to pay inspection and
                  appraisal costs:

                  a.       Inspection of Dermagen's Books, Records and licenses
                           - 21 days;
                  b.       Inspection of Dermagen's physical plant, inventory
                           and equipment - 21 days;
                  c.       Appraisal of assets to be transferred by reputable
                           independent business appraiser - Appraisal must be
                           not less than purchase price - 28 days.

         4.       Seller to deliver all assets/shares free and clear of liens,
                  loans, claims and debts. All licenses and permits to be
                  current. Bulk Sale Notice requirements to be complied with at
                  Seller's expense. All applicable taxes, insurance, rent and
                  employee salaries to be prorated to close of escrow.

         5.       Notices. Approvals/Notices to be sent to the parties by fax
                  and US mail at the following address:

                  Buyer:  Fax 310-855-0477, 369 S. Doheny Dr. #326,
                          Beverly Hills, CA 90211.

                  Seller: Fax 714-283-1165, 445 S. Peralta Hills Dr.,
                          Anaheim, CA 92807.

ALLIED MED, INC.

 /s/Jack Amin                                /s/ Prakash Charu
-----------------------------                -----------------------------------
Authorized Signature                         Prakash "Mike" Charu
7/22/2005                                    7/22/05
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Scott M. Colosi,Chief Financial Officer of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 25, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 1, 2008 | By:    | /s/ SCOTT M. COLOSI     |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|              |   |                    |
|              |   | Scott M. Colosi         |
|              |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
49954.

#### FAMBER v. THE STATE.

Quillian, Judge.

When the only evidence to support the verdict of the jury which found the defendant guilty of burglary was the testimony of a co-conspirator and the results of a *113polygraph test, it was error not to grant the motion for a new trial on the general grounds.

Submitted January 9, 1975

Decided February 25, 1975.

*Donald G. Loggins,*for appellant.

*Samuel J. Brantley, District Attorney,*for appellee.

It is well settled that the uncorroborated testimony of a co-conspirator is not sufficient to authorize a felony conviction. Code § 38-121. See *Wise v. State,*52 Ga. App. 98, 99 (182 SE2d 535).

Therefore, the only remaining issue is whether the results of the polygraph test are sufficient to corroborate the testimony of the lone co-conspirátor. The question is answered in the negative. This is true even though the defendant consented to the test and agreed that its results be admitted in evidence. In *Cagle v. State,*132 Ga. App. 227, 229 (207 SE2d 703), it was held that the results of a polygraph test were not admissible in evidence. Following the reasoning of the *Cagle*case and others on this subject *(Johnson v. Aetna Ins. Co., 124*Ga. App. 112, 113 (183 SE2d 85); *Salisbury v. State,*221 Ga. 718 (4) (146 SE2d 776)), we have concluded and so rule that the results of a polygraph test are not only inadmissible but also have no probative value.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Clark and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
1 

### Hawks, Rob (FAA)

From: W. Eric Pilsk <epilsk@kaplankirsch.com>

Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 11:55 AM

To: 9-AWA-AGC-Part-16 (FAA)

Cc: (Kay.Bigelow@chandleraz.gov); Hawks, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Chandler Air Services v. City of Chandler, Docket No 16-13-05: Request for Extension of

Time

The City of Chandler requests a two week extension, to March 23, 2016, to submit the Town’s Action Plan regarding

aviation fuel taxes and to provide additional information requested in the February 9, 2016 Director’s Determination. In

the Director’s Determination the Director ordered the City to:



### Submit either an action plan as discusse d above of the enabling legislation and

any other substantiating documents (includi ng amendments of legislation) to the

FAA to review grandfathering status of the City’s tax. Additionally, the City is

directed, within 30 days, to submit a repor t detailing the reason for the offset of

the sales tax obligation on fuel flowage fees in the form of a waiver for Chandler

Air Service.

An additional two weeks will allow the City sufficient time to locate the necessary records and provide a complete

response to the Director’s request. Such a complete response will promote efficiency by assuring that the Director as

the necessary information before him and will not prejudice the FAA or any entity.

Accordingly, the City of Chandler respectfully requests an extension of time through March 23, 2016 to provide the

information requested in the Director’s Determination.

W. Eric Pilsk

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP

1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 800

Washington, DC 20036

epilsk@kaplankirsch.com

202.955.5600

http://www.kaplankirsch.com

Confidentiality Notice : The information contained in this e

‐ mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient named above. Any metadata

contained in this message or attachments is not intended for disclosure to the recipient or anyone else. This message may be an attorney

‐ client communication and/or

confidential work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you have received this document in error. Any review, dissemination, distribution, or

copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e

‐ mail, and delete the original message.

Please consider our environment before printing this email.
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Mercantile Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. McGrath, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company.





/s/ Michael P. McGrathMichael P. McGrathExecutive Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary

and Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Thomas P. Russo, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
(Amendment No. 1) for the period ended June 30, 2005 of the Registrant (the
"Report"):

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

          By:                         /s/ THOMAS P. RUSSO
             -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        Thomas P. Russo
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT, TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                       METAMORPHIX, INC.

Date:  December 15, 2006
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Presstek, Inc.
Hudson, New Hampshire


We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  respective
Registration  Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-80466,  33-61215,  33-39337,  and
333-76905) and on Forms S-3 (Nos.  333-2299 and 33-48342) of Presstek,  Inc. and
in the Prospectuses  constituting  part of such  Registration  Statements of our
report  dated  February  14,  2000  (except for note 14, as to which the date is
March 24, 2000 ) relating to the financial  statements and schedule of Presstek,
Inc.  appearing in the  Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 1, 2000

We also  consent to the  references  to us under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Prospectuses.



/s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

     BDO SEIDMAN, LLP



New York, New York
March 30, 2000