alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2007 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.
| **Date: August 10, 2007** | ** ** | ** **                                               |
|---------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |       | /s/ Dale B. Herbst                                       |   |
|                      |       | Name: Dale B. Herbst                                     |
|                      |       | Title: Chief Financial  Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer ofMPC Corporation (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

(i) theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2008 (the “*Report*”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(ii) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|               | /s/  Curtis Akey                                   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
| May 15,  2008 | Curtis  Akey                                       |
|               | Vice  President & Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
#### Johnny Hugh FRITH v. STATE.

No. 6 Div. 610.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

April 12, 1988.

TYSON, Judge.

This cause is reversed and remanded for a new trial on.authority of *Ex Parte Frith,*modified on rehearing March 18, 1988, 526 So.2d 880 (Ala.1988).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.
SERVED JUNE 22, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRAVO AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10SO0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA 2010 - 0320 

NOTICE OF HEARING DATES 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the following 

procedural schedule: 

... On or before August 21, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery 

including, but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to 

production requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a 

discovery dispute they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution 

in a timely manner... 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on September 3,2010, inclusive, in the National Transportatiao Safety Board 

Courtroom, 1515 W. 190tli ST. Ste 555, Gardena, CA 90248. Settled cases will not 

be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the proper pleading(s). 

Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, expresjuataitn^ourier or postal service. 

•-'•r:ri i 

tichard C. Gloodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10SO0006 | 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Robert J. Cullen 

Bravo Aviation, Inc., Respondent 

7000 Merrill Avenue, Suite 31 

Chino,CA 91710 

TEL: 909-606-8605 

FAX: 909-606-8639 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Southern Region, ASO-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Carl F. Miller, Jr., :

an individual, :

Appellant :

:

v. : No. 1654 C.D. 2015

:

Davies Ford, Inc., :

a corporation :

O R D E R

NOW, October 7, 2016, upon consideration of appellee’s

application for reargument and appellant’s answer in response thereto, the 

application is denied.

 MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

 President Judge
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12



                      STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                                (In thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  Years Ended December 31,
                                               ------------------------------------------------------------        Adjusted
                                                                                                                   Pro Forma
                                               1993          1994          1995          1996          1997          1997
                                               ----          ----          ----          ----          ----          ----
<S>                                          <C>            <C>          <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>

Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest on long-term debt
      and amortization of debt discount      $  1,921       $    736      $    859      $    581      $  3,696       $  3,696
                                             ========       ========      ========      ========      ========       ========


Earnings, as defined:
    Income (loss) before income taxes        $(11,739)      $  6,134      $ 16,112      $  8,522      $(15,208)      $ 17,338
     Total fixed charges (as
       shown above)                             1,921            736           859           581         3,696
                                             --------       --------      --------      --------      --------


          Earnings available for
            fixed charges                    $ (9,818)      $  6,870      $ 16,971      $  9,103      $(11,512)      $ 21,034
                                             ========       ========      ========      ========      ========       ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred dividend requirements                     -           9.3x         19.8x         15.7x             -           5.7x
                                             ========       ========      ========      ========      ========       ========

</TABLE>
From: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US

To: jamie.hancock@hydro.com

Cc: Todd Russo/R4/USEPA/US@EPA, Denis Kler/R4/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/15/2012 08:11 AM

Subject: Switching Furnace Classifications

Hi Jamie, I was looking through your permit and noticed that you are allowed to switch from Group 1 

controlled to Group 1 uncontrolled or Group 2. I am looking for some information in regards to the 

frequency at which these switches take place. For at least a 5 year period, please list how many switches 

occurred each of those years for each furnace that switches and specify whether the number of switches 

during that year were due to unplanned maintenance, planned maintenance or other reason (please 

specify). Please confirm that you have received this e-mail. Thanks

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
From: Timothy.Keesling@hydro.com

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jamie.Hancock@hydro.com

Date: 08/20/2012 08:49 AM

Subject: Use of AOS - Henderson, KY

Hello Rochelle,

Jamie Hancock went through all of the malfunction reports and we have

boiled down the ones where we ran the melt furnace under the Alternative

Operating scenario.

The chart below indicated since late 2009, we have implemented the AOS a

total of 6 times.

The range of time where the AOS was used was between 4 and 56 hours.

As we discussed on the phone last week, the plant does not regularly use

the AOS as a typical operating process. but rather uses it when part of the

evacuation system needs maintenance or has a malfunction.

Please let us know if you have any other questions.

P.S. - Jamie indicated that he was supposed to have this to you on Friday,

but their network had problems and he could not get it out.

(Embedded image moved to file: pic27272.jpg)

Timothy L. Keesling, P.E.

Corporate Environmental Director

Hydro Aluminum North America, Inc

Extrusion North America

3301 Carnegie Lane

Matthews, NC 28105

Phone - 704-301-1845

e-mail - Timothy.Keesling@Hydro.com
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 194 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 194

Expressing sympathy for the victims of the devastating earthquake that 
                  struck Taiwan on September 21, 1999.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing sympathy for the victims of the devastating earthquake that 
                  struck Taiwan on September 21, 1999.

Whereas on the morning of September 21, 1999, a devastating and deadly 
        earthquake shook the counties of Nantou and Taichung, Taiwan, killing 
        more than 2,000 people, injuring more than 7,800, and leaving more than 
        100,000 homeless;
Whereas the earthquake of September 21, 1999, has left thousands of buildings in 
        ruin, caused widespread fires, and destroyed highways and other 
        infrastructure;
Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the people of Taiwan has 
        been displayed since the earthquake;
Whereas the people of the United States and Taiwan share strong friendship and 
        mutual interests and respect;
Whereas the United States has offered whatever technical assistance might be 
        needed and has dispatched the Urban Search and Rescue Team of Fairfax 
        County, Virginia, the Fire Rescue Team of Miami-Dade, Florida, and 
        others; and
Whereas offers of assistance have come from the Governments of Japan, Singapore, 
        Turkey, and others: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the people of 
        Nantou and Taichung and all of Taiwan for the tragic losses 
        suffered as a result of the earthquake of September 21, 1999;
            (2) expresses its support for the people of Taiwan as they 
        continue their efforts to rebuild their cities and their lives;
            (3) expresses support for disaster assistance being 
        provided by the United States Agency for International 
        Development and other relief agencies; and
            (4) recognizes and encourages the important assistance that 
        also could be provided by foreign countries to alleviate the 
        suffering of the people of Taiwan.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 294 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 294

 Designating the month of October 2000 as ``Children's Internet Safety 
                                Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 2000

   Mr. Abraham (for himself and Mr. McCain) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating the month of October 2000 as ``Children's Internet Safety 
                                Month''.

Whereas the Internet is one of the most effective tools available for purposes 
        of education and research and gives children the means to make friends 
        and freely communicate with peers and family anywhere in the world;
Whereas the new era of instant communication holds great promise for achieving 
        better understanding of the world and providing the opportunity for 
        creative inquiry;
Whereas it is vital to the well-being of children that the Internet offer an 
        open and responsible environment to explore;
Whereas access to objectionable material, such as violent, obscene, or sexually 
        explicit adult material may be received by a minor in unsolicited form;
Whereas there is a growing concern in all levels of society to protect children 
        from objectionable material;
Whereas the technological option for parents or guardians to filter, block, or 
        review objectionable Internet material is available and effective;
Whereas information on Internet filtering or blocking technology is unavailable 
        to many parents or guardians; and
Whereas the Internet is a positive educational tool and should be seen in such a 
        manner rather than as a vehicle for entities to make objectionable 
        materials available to children: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates October 2000 as ``Children's Internet Safety 
        Month'' and supports its official status on the Nation's 
        promotional calendar; and
            (2) supports parents and guardians in promoting the 
        creative development of children by encouraging the use of the 
        Internet in a safe, positive manner with the aid of Internet 
        filtering and blocking technologies.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

MAHLON KIRWA, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

DEFENSE, et al., 

 Defendants. 

 Civil Action No. 17-1793(ESH) 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. (Pls.’ Mot. For Class 

Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel, Sept. 19, 2017, ECF No. 12, (“Class Mot.”); 

Supp. Mem. in Support of Pls.’ Class Mot., Nov. 3, 2017, ECF No. 34, (“Supp. Class Mot.”).) 

The Court thoroughly considered the present class certification issues when it provisionally 

certified the class in Kirwa, No. 17-cv-1793, 2017 WL 4862763 (D.D.C. Oct. 25, 2017), and 

when it certified the class in the related Nio case, Nio v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 

No. 17-cv-998, 2017 WL 4876276 (D.D.C. Oct. 27, 2017). In fact, “[d]efendants have decided 

not to oppose Plaintiffs’ motion in this case because the Court granted a similar motion for class 

certification in Nio . . . . The Government reserves its objections to class certification that it set 

forth in the Nio litigation.” (Notice of Defs.’ Non-Opp. to Pls.’ Mot. for Class Cert., Nov. 28, 

2017, ECF No. 40, at 1.) 

 The only remaining dispute between the parties regarding class certification is whether 

the class should be defined as those MAVNI enlistees who have not received a completed Form 
2 

N-426 as October 25, 2017, or whether the class should be defined as those MAVNI enlistees 

who have not received a completed Form N-426 as of the filing of this opinion. Consistent with 

the definition the Court used to provisionally certify the class, the Court will define the class as 

all persons who (1) have enlisted in the U.S. military through the Military Accessions Vital to the 

National Interest (“MAVNI”) program prior to October 13, 2017, (2) who have served in the 

Selected Reserve of the Ready Reserve (“Selected Reserve”), and (3) have not received a 

completed and duly authenticated Form N-426. 

 The formal joint communication to the class members, which defendants have agreed to 

distribute, shall not be disseminated until the Court’s resolution of the dispute between the 

parties regarding language about the class members’ rights under the preliminary injunction. 

(See Notice of Filing of Proposed Joint Communication to Class Members, Nov. 29, 2017, ECF 

No. 43.) Having satisfied itself that plaintiffs have met the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 23, the Court will certify a class as further detailed in the Court’s accompanying 

Order, ECF No. 48. 

 

 /s/ Ellen Segal Huvelle 

 ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE 

 United States District Judge 

Date: December 1, 2017
7. The sUAS Pilot will serve as Pilot in Command (PIC). If

a pilot certificate holder, other than the sUAS Pilot,

possesses the necessary PIC qualifications and is also

present, that person can also be designated as PIC.

8. The sUAS will only operate within an area as defined in

the Manual on pages 21

- 22. Additionally, the sUAS will

only operate under 400ft AGL, and outside a 3 statute

mile radius of any airport. The sUAS will never enter

any MOA or Restricted Airspace, nor shall it violate any

TFR as outlined by the FAA.

9. A pre

- flight briefing will be conducted in regard to the

planned sUAS operation prior to each day’s flying /

recording activities. It will be mandatory that all

personnel who will be performing duties as “flight crew”

be present for this briefing.

10. The Operator will obtain the consent of all persons

involved in the filming and ensure that only consenting

persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight

operation, and this radius may be reduce d to 30 feet

based upon an equivalent level of safety determination.

11. Pilot, and Spotter (Observer) will have been trained in

operation of sUAS generally and received up

- to

- date

information on the particular sUAS to be operated as

required.

12. Spotter (Observer) and Pilot will at all times be able to

communicate by voice or radio.

13. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant

property holders will be obtained.

14. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS

signal, the UAS will have capability to return to a pre

determined location and land.

15. The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in

case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.
VERNELLE JONES, 

FORMER PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF MERVIN ALLEN 

JONES, SR.,

Appellant,

v.

PETER C. K. ENWALL, 

SUCCESSOR PERSONAL 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF MERVIN ALLEN 

JONES, SR.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1927

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 26, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Donna M Keim, Judge.

Vernelle Jones, Former Personal Representative of the Estate of Mervin Allen 

Jones, Sr., pro se, Appellant.

Peter C. K. Enwall, Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Mervin 

Allen Jones, Sr., pro se, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

RAY, MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, David
J. Keefe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2010



|    |  |                                     
|--- |  | ------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ David J. Keefe                  
|    |  | David J. Keefe                      
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director