alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mabel Washington, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Kings County,

February 24, 1959.

*Florman, Goldstein & Florman*for petitioner.

*Thomas E. O’Donnell,*as special guardian for incompetent children of decedent.

*Siev’s Nursing Home,*creditor, for itself.

Maximilian Moss, S.

The compromise of the cause of action for wrongful death of decedent is approved. Petitioner is authorized to pay the balance of decedent’s funeral expenses. Decedent was 50 years of age at the time of her death and left her surviving a husband age 55, an infant child 17 years of age and five adult children.

Decedent’s infant son, James, was gainfully employed, earning $40 per week at the time of decedent’s death and was not dependent upon decedent for support and maintenance. *578Decedent was employed as a nurses’ aid and earned about $20 a month less than said infant. Since he was self-supporting and not dependent on decedent he is not entitled to share in the wrongful death recovery *(Matter of Di Gangi,*135 N. Y. S. 2d 58). Two of decedent’s adult daughters were incompetent and confined in State hospitals. One of said daughters, Doris, was married and has since been discharged from the hospital. The obligation to support and maintain decedent’s married daughter is primarily that of her husband. Decedent’s daughter Margaret is unmarried and still hospitalized.

The proceeds recovered for wrongful death are distributable to decedent’s spouse and next of kin in proportion to the pecuniary injuries suffered. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, the court determines that the husband suffered pecuniary loss to the extent of 85% and decedent’s incompetent adult daughter, Margaret, 15%. The distributable share payable to Margaret, shall be paid to the superintendent of the institution where she is hospitalized, for her use and benefit *(Gross*v. *Abraham,*306 N. Y. 525; Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 271). The proceeds of the wrongful death recovery form no part of decedent’s general estate and are not subject to payment of decedent’s debts. The alleged claim of decedent’s employer, for money loaned to decedent, is disallowed *(Baldwin*v. *Powell,*45 N. Y. S. 2d 785; *Matter of Ehret,*247 App. Div. 456; *Central N. Y. Coach Lines*v. *Syracuse Herald Co.,*277 N. Y. 110; Decedent Estate Law, § 133).

The compensation and disbursements of petitioner’s attorneys are approved in the amounts set forth in the account, which shall include all services rendered and to be rendered to the entry of decree and distribution thereunder.

Settle decree on notice.
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A  of NYMAGIC, INC.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report; and3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report.
 May 8, 2008
    /s/ Thomas J. IacopelliThomas J. IacopelliChief Financial Officer
#### Alain F. CRACCO, M.D. v. Phillip J. BARRAS.

No. 88-C-0116.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Barras, Phillip J.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7666; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “B”, No. 83-6655.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1256.

Granted. Judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed. Judgment of the district court is reinstated.
#### Patricia Verdon ANDERSON v. Thomas J. ANDERSON, Sr.

No. 87-C-1089.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Anderson, Thomas J. Sr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-0652; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 209-183.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 200.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Robert L. BROWN v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1160.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Brown, Robert L.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 309-794; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-7682.

Denied. Appeal pending.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

# ACTION:

Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on April 27, 2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Internal Revenue Service, 31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD 21201.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patrick W. McDonough, Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202-622-8225.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at Internal Revenue Service, 31 Hopkins Plaza, Baltimore, MD, on April 27, 2012, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).

A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Patrick W. McDonough,

Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

[FR Doc. 2012-7500 Filed 3-28-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Memo to Docket

To : Docket for Transport Rule From: Jim Ketcham
- Colwill Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Policy Analy sis and Review Date: November 15, 2010 Regarding: November 12, 2010, meeting with PPL representatives on Transport Rule PPL Attendees: Paulette C. Pidcock Vice President
- Federal Government Relations PPL 900 Seventh Street, NW #510 Washington, DC 20001 Reid T. Clemmer Environmental Supervisor PPL Services Corp. Arundhati Khanwalkar Senior Director, Environmental Management P PL
EPA OPAR Attendees: Rob Brenner, Director Jim Ketcham
- Colwill Tamara Saltman PPL representatives requested this meeting with the Office and Air and Radiation. PPL representatives expressed general support for the proposed Transport Rule to replace the Clean Air Interstate Rule, but expressed strong concern about allocation provisions. PPL representatives indicated that the compan y has predominatel y been a merchant power provider , (though it recentl y has acquired a regulated utility in Kentucky), and that their comments reflect that perspective . They expressed concern about the allocation provisions on grounds that the proposed approach (1) is unfair, (2) disadvantages companies that have invested in controls previously under the market
- based CAI R sy stem or for other reasons (e.g., in comparison to a heat
- input
- based approach, the proposed approach will provide man y millions of dollars less in allowance value to companies plants that are alread y well controlled), (3) is based on emissions projection s that are not reliable , and (4) may have negative environmental results because cleaner plants that previously

controlled and receive fewer allowances may not be dispatched if less
- well
- controlled plants receive more allowances and receive a cost advantag e from allowance allocations.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.54


                            COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY
                           MONTGOMERY CIRCUIT COURT
                                  CIVIL BRANCH


COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY                                    PLAINTIFF
(Through its Agent AEGON USA Realty Advisors, Inc.)


                             NOTICE OF SATISFACTION              NO. 99-CI-90023
                                  OF JUDGMENT

BRUNNER COMPANIES INCOME                                              DEFENDANTS
PROPERTIES, L.P., III, et al

                              *** *** *** *** ***

         The plaintiff, Commonwealth Life Insurance Company (through its agent
AEGON USA Realty Advisors, Inc.) hereby gives notice that the judgment against
the defendant, Brunner Companies Income Properties, L.P., III, which was entered
on July 9, 1999, has been paid and satisfied in full and that there are no other
pending claims or matters in this action.

         DATED this 10th day of January, 2000.


                      STOLL, KEENON & PARK, LLP
                      201 E. Main Street, Suite 1000
                      Lexington, Kentucky 40507
                      Phone: (606) 231-3000


                      By: /s/ Harvie B. Wilkinson
                         ------------------------
                          HARVIE B. WILKINSON
                          ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
----

| (1)   | the      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the      “Annual Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934 (15 U>S>C> 78m or 78o(d))and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | information      contained in the Annual report fairly presents, in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of ECCO Energy      Corp. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: April 23,      2008 | By:      /s/ Samuel M. Skipper |   |
|---------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                            | Name:      Samuel M. Skipper   |   |
|                            | Title:      President and CEO  |   |
Exhibit 32.1



                     Certification Pursuant to Section 906
                       of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Strategic
Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John P. O'Shea, President of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results or operations of the
        Company.



/s/ JOHN P. O'SHEA                                               August 5, 2008
---------------------------------
John P. O'Shea
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE .OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. : 7 

11. 21 A 10: S2 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

COASTAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC. 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. FAA~2011-1005 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA CASE NO. 2010S0700037 

COMPLAINANT'S STATEMENT REGARDING VENUE 

The Complainant, by and through his undersigned attorney, hereby submits in accordance 

with the Administrative Judge's Order dated June 11, 2012, the Complainant's Statement 

Regarding Venue as follows: 

The Complainant has completed a review of the facts and issues presented in this matter 

and has determined that the Agency is not opposed to Respondent's request for venue. 

Previously Respondent asked for venue to be set in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. In light of the 

geographic locations of the Agency's witnesses the Complainant is agreeable to venue for the 

hearing of this matter to be set in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. 

Respectfully submitted this 26th day of July 2012. 

~~R{hr Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a,copy of the foregoing Complainant's Statement Regarding Venue was 

mailed by Federal Express and facsimile to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

DOT, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

and via Express Mail to: 

Michael Foster, President 

Coastal Air Transport, Inc. 

P.O. Box 3985 

Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00822 

and the original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Hearing Docket 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 \ 

Legal 

~=~~1 Assistant 

JUL 2 6 2012 

Dated 

2
Exhibit 10.2



                                 August 1, 2005



The Board of Directors
Assure Data, Inc.
6680 Yosemite
Dallas, Texas 75254


Gentlemen:

         Reference the Form SB-2 Registration  Statement of Assure Data, Inc. As
disclosed in the "Use of Proceeds"  section,  this will evidence our  commitment
that,  in the event the proceeds of the offering are  insufficient  to cover the
estimated offering costs of approximately $50,000, the undersigned hereby commit
and  agree to  contribute  to the  Company  sufficient  funds to cover  all such
offering costs.

         In addition,  the  undersigned  commit and agree that, in the event the
Company  experiences a deficit in its cash flow during the 12 months ending July
31, 2006, they will advance the Company sufficient funds to continue operations.
Any  such  loans  will  bear  interest  at the  annual  rate of 5%,  and will be
repayable upon demand.  No demand will be made unless the Company possesses cash
flow from  operations or third party  financings  such that repayment  would not
cause the Company to be unable to meet its foreseeable obligations.

                                                      /s/ Robert Lisle
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Robert Lisle



                                                      /s/ Max Kipness
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Max Kipness
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50962 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MIGUEL DE LA ROSA

- PADILLA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 419

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel De La Rosa

Padilla has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De La Rosa

- Padilla has fil ed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected
therein , as well as De La Rosa

- Padilla ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50962 Document: 00513558078 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 50962

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review

. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50962 Document: 00513558078 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

MATHEW GRUBEL, ERIC TOMLINSON, 

FRANCES BYERS, CAROL M. 

COCCAGNA, AND THE CLASS THEY 

REPRESENT, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND COUNTY 

BOARD OF ELECTIONS, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 710 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,709,301
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  703,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,407,997
<PP&E>                                      11,123,307
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,264,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,266,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          329,586
<BONDS>                                        144,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,792,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,266,781
<SALES>                                      3,616,524
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,160,629
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,165,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,922,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,922,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,922,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
#### Bobby G. POSEY, Appellant, v. Irene MAGILL, Appellee.

No. 87-851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Aug. 22, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 7, 1988.

Bobby G. Posey, in pro. per.

Jeffrey P. Whitton, Panama City, for ap-pellee.

THOMPSON, Judge.

Bobby G. Posey, the plaintiff below, appeals a final order dismissing his complaint *986against appellee and denying him leave to file an amended complaint. We reverse.

Pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190, a party may amend his pleading one time “as a matter of course before a responsive pleading is served.” When Posey’s initial complaint was dismissed he tendered an amended complaint and requested permission to amend, which was denied. The tendered amended complaint states causes of action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and civil perjury. Unless it is clear from the face of a complaint that amendment would be futile, failure to grant a plaintiff at least one opportunity to amend his complaint constitutes an abuse of discretion. *Ayers v. Home Owners Association of Killeam Estates,*360 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Accordingly, the denial of leave to amend is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with instructions that Posey be afforded an opportunity to amend his initial complaint as mandated by Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.190.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Ming Hsieh, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Cogent, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

This certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Dated: August 8,
2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    MING HSIEH                    
|Ming Hsieh                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL
                          FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Flooring Zone, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Michael Carroll, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 12, 2005                                   /s/  Michael Carroll
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Michael Carroll,
                                                     Principal Financial Officer