alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1252

GULAM SAMAD NOORY,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-425-643)

Submitted: October 17, 2005 Decided: December 27, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

Michael E. Hadeed, Miguel Rodriquez Rivera, BECKER, HADEED, KELLOGG

& BERRY, P.C., Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Paul J.

McNulty, United States Attorney, Anita C. Snyder, Assistant United

States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gulam Samad Noory, a native and citizen of Afghanistan,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his

applications for asylum and withholding of removal. 

To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility

for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was

so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the

requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S.

478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and

conclude that Noory fails to show that the evidence compels a

contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Noory cannot

meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal.

Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v.

Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-69]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 2, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. KeyCorp, Cleveland, Ohio; to retain, in a fiduciary capacity, 
9.75 percent of the outstanding voting shares of Mechanics Financial 
Corporation, and thereby retain Mechanics Savings Bank, both in 
Mansfield, Ohio.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Teton Financial Services, LLC, Wilson, Wyoming; to become a bank 
holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Rocky 
Mountain Bank, Wilson, Wyoming.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 3, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-69 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 70I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 070I |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 63° anno4 marzo 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 070I

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

63° anno4 marzo 2020

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| | Rettifica del bando di assunzione n. PE/242/S — Direttore (F/M) (gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale dell’Innovazione e dell’assistenza tecnologica — Direzione dell’Edizione, dell’innovazione e della gestione dei dati ( GU C 065A del 28.2.2020 ) | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

Rettifica del bando di assunzione n. PE/242/S — Direttore (F/M) (gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale dell’Innovazione e dell’assistenza tecnologica — Direzione dell’Edizione, dell’innovazione e della gestione dei dati ( GU C 065A del 28.2.2020 )

( GU C 065A del 28.2.2020 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 4.3.2020 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CI 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2020

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CI 70/1

---

Rettifica del bando di assunzione n. PE/242/S — Direttore (F/M) (gruppo di funzioni AD, grado 14) — Direzione generale dell’Innovazione e dell’assistenza tecnologica — Direzione dell’Edizione, dell’innovazione e della gestione dei dati

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 65 A del 28 febbraio 2020
  )

(2020/C 70 I/01)

Pagina 57, paragrafo 2 «Sede di servizio»:

anziché:

«Lussemburgo.»,

si legga:

«Bruxelles.».

---
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 229

Making certain majority appointments to certain Senate committees for the

106th Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 9, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Making certain majority appointments to certain Senate

committees for the 106th Congress.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of rule

2 XXV, the following shall constitute the majority member3 ship on those Senate committees listed below for the 106th

4 Congress, or until their successors are appointed:

5 COMMITTEE ON FINANCE: Mr. Roth (Chairman), Mr.

6 Grassley, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Nickles, Mr.

7 Gramm, Mr. Lott, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Mack, Mr. Thomp8 son, and Mr. Coverdell.

9 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: Mr. Helms

10 (Chairman), Mr. Lugar, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Smith of Oregon,
2

SRES 229 ATS

1 Mr. Grams, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Ashcroft,

2 Mr. Frist, and Mr. Chafee.

3 COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS:

4 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire (Chairman), Mr. Warner,

5 Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Bond, Mr. Voinovich, Mr.

6 Crapo, Mr. Bennett, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. Chafee.

7 COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Roberts (Chairman),

8 Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, and Mr. Voinovich.

Æ
VDOS Global, LLC 

230 SW 61

h Street 

Corvallis, OR 97333 

January 3, 2016 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment to VDOS Global Exemption No. 111128 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 111128 to add additional 

aircraft to the exemption-holder's authorized commercial operations. On April 29, 2015, the FAA 

granted this Petition for Exemption to operate small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of 

aerial data collection. The petitioner now seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the 

operation of the following additional unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for the purpose of aerial data 

collection: 

• UASUSA Tempest 

• Falcon Unmanned Falcon 

• UAV Solutions Talon 120E 

Copies of the manufacturer flight manuals for each of these systems will be submitted to our docket. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any 

questions. 

Than~------~> Seth Johnson 

Chief Pilot 

VDOS Global, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000847464
<NAME>                        MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATIONS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         90,581
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  459,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                   21,174
<INVENTORY>                                    513,358
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,133,148
<PP&E>                                         1,345,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                 494,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,118,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,746,563
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,596,000
<COMMON>                                       10,190,092
<OTHER-SE>                                     (439,769)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,118,463
<SALES>                                        5,443,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,443,603
<CGS>                                          3,215,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,692,684
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             186,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (650,627)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (650,627)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (650,627)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.024)



</TABLE>
### IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 09

- 00009

- CR

ED COOKS
, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas
Trial Court No. 31327

- CR

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Edward Cooks of 5 counts of sexual assault and assessed his

punishment at 35 years confinement and a $ 10,000 fine for each count. T EX

. P ENAL

C ODE A NN

. 22.011 (Vernon Pamph. 2010 ). We reverse and remand.

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due on April 13, 2009. After

numerous attempts to obtain the record, this Court issued an order on November 10,

2010, abating the appeal for a second time to determine whether the reporter’s recordCooks v. State Page 2

was “lost or des troyed” within the meaning of T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.6(f). The tri al court

conducted a hearing in accordance with this Court’s order.

The trial court entered findings that (1) the original court reporter is not capable

of preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal, (2) another certified court reporter

determined that a proper reporter’s record cannot be prepared from the records, and (3)

the reporter’s record is irretrievably lost. The trial court concluded that the lost,

destroyed, or inaudible portions of the reporter’s record are necessary to the appeal’s

resoluti on.

Rule 34.6 (f) states that an appellant is entitled to a new trial under the following

circumstances:

(1) if the appellant has timely requested a reporter's record; (2) if, without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant portio n of the court reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or

-- if the proceedings were electronically recorded

-- a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record, or the lost or destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution; and (4) if the lost, destroyed or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed e xhibit cannot be replaced either by agreement of the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit.

Because the reporter’s record is irretrievably lost and necessary to the app eal, we

reverse Cooks’s convictions and remand the case for a new trial. Payne v. State , 802

S.W.2d 686 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990).Cooks v. State Page 3 AL SCOGGINS Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Reversed and remanded Opinion delivered and filed February 2, 2011 Do not publish [CRPM]
DOE Finance Subgroup Interest Rate Loan Term DownPayment

Chattel/Personal Property 6.3 - 9.5% 12-20 years 12-18%

Real Property/Mortgage 3.957-4.320% 15-30 years 10-20% (Conv.)

3.5% FHA

2013 78% of homes financed with Chattel/personal property

Source: US Census
Points & Fees Private Mortgage Insurance (PMI) Property Tax

1-2% n/a n/a

1-2% .5-1% (Convential) See chart

120-125 basis points for >90LTV FHA
Sales Tax Chart Link

See chart http://taxfoundation.org/article/state-and-local-sales-tax-rates-2014

See chart
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07178

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07178\07178_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07178\07178_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07178\07178_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07178\07178_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07178\07178_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07178\07178_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

07178\Certification Statement_07178.pdf Plant certification statement

07178\Supporting Documentation\07178_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07178\Supporting Documentation\07178_MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07178\Supporting Documentation\07178_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07178\Supporting Documentation\07178_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 28 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 28

                Amending paragraph 1(m)(1) of rule XXV.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                Amending paragraph 1(m)(1) of rule XXV.

    Resolved, That paragraph 1(m)(1) of rule XXV is amended as follows:
            (1) Strike ``Committee on Labor and Human Resources'' and 
        insert in lieu thereof ``Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 
        and Pensions''.
            (2) Strike ``Handicapped individuals'' and insert in lieu 
        thereof ``Individuals with disabilities''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte Donald Ralph HORNSBY (re Donald Ralph Hornsby v. State of Alabama).

86-1618.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Nov. 20, 1987.

Roderick Beddow, Jr., of Beddow, Fullan & Vowell, Birmingham, and Fred Blanton, Jr., Gardendale, for petitioner.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

HOUSTON, Justice.

We should not be understood as agreeing with all the statements or the reasoning relating to the probable cause analysis in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion, 517 So.2d 631; even so, we conclude that the writ is due to be denied.

WRIT DENIED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-07-1125   0004-383-0        -000-CV

JOHNNY WILLIAMSON AND	APPELLANTS	

SHAYLYN WILLIAMSON

	V.

FIRST TEXAS HOMES, INC. D/B/A	APPELLEES

InN tThHeE InNtTeErReEsStT oOfF J.D.G., A ChHiIlLdD

GALLERY CUSTOM HOMES D/B/A

FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES

	----------

	FROM THE 393RD 778TH778TH         DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA  DENTON          COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On  aUGUSTAugust 13, 2007              ,  June 2, 2005, we notified appellant[s] Brednda Jones that [his/her /theirtheir] brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).  TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we wCcwould dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant [s]s Brenda Jones or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant bRbREDNABrendna Jones has not filed her ’s [s’]’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal of Brenda Jones for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

	Appellant  [s] shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	 :  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.    LIVINSGSTON, CAYCE, C.J.; dAUPDAUPHINOT,, and HOLMAN, jjJJ.

DELIVERED:     June 30, 2005 August 29301, 2007
#### In re ESTATE OF Margarette PRICE, Deceased, Appellant, v. WEST FLORIDA HOSPITAL, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-135.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Edward P. Fleming and Jeffrey T. Sauer, of Smith, Sauer & Walker, P.A., Pensacola, for appellant.

Terry B. Boutwell, of Hayt, Hayt & Landau, Pensacola, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The decedent, Margarette Price, died testate on July 15, 1986. At the time of her death she occupied a house which was her homestead. Fla. Const, art. X, § 4. In her will she directed that the house be sold and that the proceeds from the sale be divided equally between her adult son and daughter. Appellee West Florida Hospital, a creditor of the decedent, filed a petition claiming that the proceeds of such a sale possessed no homestead character and that therefore they were available to satisfy the claims of the decedent’s creditors.

Relying on *Orange Brevard Plumbing & Heating Co. v. La Croix,*137 So.2d 201 (Fla.1962) the circuit court concluded that upon the sale of the house the proceeds became an asset of the estate subject to the claims of decedent’s creditors. We agree. Pursuant to *Orange Brevard,*if Mrs. Price had sold her house during her lifetime and distributed the proceeds to her two children, those proceeds would unquestionably lose their homestead character and would be subject to the claims of her creditors. This result is not altered because the sale, with no intent to reinvest the proceeds, took place following her death in accordance with the directions in her will. Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is AFFIRMED.

BOOTH and SHIVERS, JJ., and BOWER, N. RUSSELL, Associate Judge, concur.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4862 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 18, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Manuel Rodriguez, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Jones v. State, 569 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 1990); Campbell v. State, 884 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2005 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date: August 15,  2005** |                            |
|---------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                            | /s/  John  Fitzpatrick     |   |
|                            | Name:  John Fitzpatrick         |
|                            | Title:  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### TELESAT CABLEVISION, INCORPORATED, Telesat Cablevision of South Florida, Inc., and Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc., Appellants, v. SUNBELT-DENNTRONICS CABLE LTD., and the Engle Group, Inc., Appellees.

No. 88-0755.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 19, 1988.

Donald M. Middlebrooks, L. Martin Reed-er, Jr., and Thomas R. Julin of Steel Hector Davis Burns & Middleton, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

John D. Boykin and Fredric E. Epstien of Boose Casey Ciklin Lubitz Martens McBane & O’Connell, West Palm Beach, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand with direction to vacate the temporary injunction. *Wilson v. Sandstrom,*317 So.2d 732, 736 (Fla. 1975), *cert. denied,*423 U.S. 1053, 96 S.Ct. 782, 46 L.Ed.2d 642 (1976).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.