alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q as
of March 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000846919
<NAME> ESSEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  222,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,434
<INVENTORY>                                    242,954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               469,285
<PP&E>                                         396,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 117,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 886,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,370
<BONDS>                                        468,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           230
<OTHER-SE>                                     166,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   886,938
<SALES>                                        410,778
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               410,778
<CGS>                                          330,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,843
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,243
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George B. BROWN.

No. 88-KK-0019.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Brown, George B.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW 87 1633; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 8-87-380.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[2410-OYC]


Notice of Continuation of Visitor Services

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the terms of the listed existing concession 
contract, the National Park Service hereby gives notice that it has 
continued visitor services for a period not-to-exceed 1 year from the 
date of contract expiration.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contract listed below has been extended 
to the maximum allowable under 36 CFR 51.23. Under the provisions of 
the current concession contract and pending the completion of the 
public solicitation of a prospectus for a new authorization, the 
National Park Service authorizes continuation of visitor services for a 
period not-to-exceed 1 year under the terms and conditions of the 
current contract as amended. The continuation of operations does not 
affect any rights with respect to selection for award of a new 
authorization.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Conc ID No.            Concessioner name           Park
------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDE001-94..................  Concepts by Staib,    Independence
                               Ltd.                  National Historical
                                                     Park.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Chief, Commercial 
Services Program, National Park Service, 1201 Eye Street NW., 11th 
Floor, Washington, DC 20005, Telephone (202) 513-7156.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Robert M. Gordon,
Acting Associate Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-6963 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-P
Exhibit 31.1
 
 Certification
 
 I, Mauro Terrevazzi, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MC Shipping Inc. (the Registrant);2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and have;a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b)

valuated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); andc)

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarise and report financial data and have identified for the Registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls; and6.

The Registrants other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 March 19, 2004




Mauro TerrevazziChief Executive Officer
ERVEY SEGURA

TDCJ #1763649

RT 2, BOX 4400 z_>^

GATESVILLE, TEXAS 76597 ^_

August 21, 2015

Fourth Courc Of APPEALS

Cadena-Reeves Justice Center

300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 p^T^ ^*^ San Antonio, Texas 78205 f^ t+-.-~;

Re: #1990395336 POLICE REPORT

Appelate Court Clerk,

am writing in reference to the above numbered and styled

cause. recently purchased my Trial Transcripts and there was

no copy of my Police Reports.

know this report is part of the Record, But guess

it W3S not introduced during trial as evidence. am writing

you to find out whdt the cost will be for me to purchase my

Police Reports from you. am in desperate need of this Report

in order to adequately procure my Appeal.

Thank you in advance for your attention to my letter.

look forward to your prompt response in nopes tnat it will

incLude the requested information- I'd already wrote the Trial

Court Clerk and was cold they don't have said Report.

Sincerely

Ervey Segura #1763649

C.C.: File
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6326

HOWARD FOGG, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MS. GOODWIN, Head Nurse; MS. SAMPSON, LPN;

DOCTOR O’FOGG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-01-59-2)

Submitted: June 15, 2001 Decided: August 14, 2001

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Fogg, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Howard Fogg, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Fogg v. Goodwin, No. CA-01-59-2 (E.D. Va.

Feb. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE of Louisiana, Appellee, v. Cecil O’Neal LEA, Appellant.

No. 18158-KA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

Oct. 29, 1986.

*244William Daniel Dyess, Public Defender, Many, for appellant.

William J. Guste, Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, Don Burkett, Dist. Atty., James E. Calhoun, Asst. Dist. Atty., Mansfield, for appellee.

Before MARVIN, FRED W. JONES, Jr., and LINDSAY, JJ.

MARVIN, Judge.

Cecil O’Neal Lea appeals his sentence to three years at hard labor after pleaing guilty to simple burglary on the prosecutor’s recommendation to the court that the sentence not exceed four years and run concurrently with any sentence Lea received for a burglary committed in another parish. The sentence is not excessive per se, but we set it aside and remand for resentencing for these reasons:

Finding that Lea was a second-felony offender and ineligible for a probated sentence, the trial court mentioned that the PSI report showed that Lea had a “fairly good background,” but did not otherwise refer to any CCrP Art. 894.1 sentencing considerations.

The bill of information charged Lea with committing simple burglary in DeSoto Parish on *May 8, 1984.*The other burglary referred to by the trial court is shown to have been committed in Sabine Parish. Although Lea was sentenced in Sabine Parish on December 5, 1984, before he was sentenced in DeSoto Parish on February 5, 1986, Lea was not a second-felony offender, as the trial judge assumed. To be denied first-offender status under CCrP Art. 893, a defendant must have committed a second offense after he was *convicted*of a first offense. The date of the first conviction and not the sequence of the sentences determines when CCrP Art. 893 is applicable. *State v. Wimberly,*414 So.2d 666 (La.1982); *State v. Griffin,*455 So.2d 681 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984), writ denied, 458 So.2d 128 (La.1984). Under these circumstances, the DeSoto burglary was Lea’s *first,*and not second, *felony conviction.*

We shall therefore set aside the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with CCrP Art. 894.1. *State v. Griffin,*supra. See *State v. Curry,*400 So.2d 614 (La.1981); and *State v. Hicks,*403 So.2d 676 (La.1981).

Sentence set aside. Remanded for'resen-tencing.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 15

Making minority party appointments to Senate committees in paragraph

3 (a), (b), and (c) of rule XXV.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 7, 1999

Mr. DASCHLE submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Making minority party appointments to Senate committees

in paragraph 3 (a), (b), and (c) of rule XXV.

1 Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of S.

2 Res. 400 of the 95th Congress, or the provisions of rule

3 XXV, the following shall constitute the minority party’s

4 membership on the committees named in paragraph 3 (a),

5 (b), and (c) of rule XXV for the 106th Congress, or until

6 their successors are appointed:

7 COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Lautenberg, Mr.

8 Hollings, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Sarbanes, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs.

9 Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Johnson, and Mr.

10 Durbin.
2

SRES 15 ATS

1 COMMITTEE ON RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Mr.

2 Dodd, Mr. Byrd, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Moynihan, Mrs. Fein3 stein, Mr. Torricelli, and Mr. Schumer.

4 COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Kerry of Mas5 sachusetts, Mr. Levin, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Lieberman, Mr.

6 Wellstone, Mr. Cleland, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. Edwards.

7 COMMITTEE ON VETERANS AFFAIRS: Mr. Rocke8 feller, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Wellstone,

9 and Mrs. Murray.

10 SELECT COMMITTEE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS: Mr.

11 Inouye, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Reid of Nevada, Mr. Akaka, Mr.

12 Wellstone, and Mr. Dorgan.

13 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING: Mr. Breaux, Mr.

14 Reid of Nevada, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Wyden, Mr.

15 Reed of Rhode Island, Mr. Bayh, and Mrs. Lincoln.

16 COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE: Mr. Kerrey of Ne17 braska, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Graham of Florida, Mr. Kerry of

18 Massachusetts, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Robb, Mr. Lautenberg,

19 and Mr. Levin.

20 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE: Mr. Robb, Mr. Ken21 nedy, Mr. Sarbanes, and Mr. Bingaman.

22 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Reid of Nevada

23 (Vice Chair), Mr. Conrad, and Mr. Durbin.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 23, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136189 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136189 

 COA: 282913 

Chippewa CC: 07-008414-FC

TIMOTHY PATRIC PELTIER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 25, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0616 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 23, 2008 

 Clerk
----

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ L. Paul Latham                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| L. Paul Latham                                           |
| President and Chief Executive Officer                    |
| of Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                        |
| Managing General Partner of                              |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund IX-B, L.P. |
|                                                     |
| March 31, 2010                                           |
|                                                     |
|                                                     |
| /s/ Mel G. Riggs                                         |
| Mel G. Riggs                                             |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of            |
| Southwest Royalties, Inc., the                           |
| Managing General Partner of                              |
| Southwest Royalties Institutional Income Fund IX-B, L.P. |
|                                                     |
| March 31, 2010                                           |
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In  connection  with the  annual  report  of SK  Technologies  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, F. Peter Brewer,  Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent  thereof) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent  thereof) of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-  Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the  best  of my
knowledge and belief:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.




                              /s/ F. Peter Brewer
                              -------------------------
                              F. Peter Brewer,
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)


                              May 17, 2004
REGISTRATION NOT TRANSFERABLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA This certificate 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION must be in the airw 

CERTIFICATE OF AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION craft when operated. 

NATIONALITY AND I AIRCRAFT SERIAL NO. 

REGISTRATION MARKS N 53730 BSQ4DUTOE 

MANUFACTURER AND MANUFACTURER'S DESIGNATION OF AIRCRAFT 

STEADIDRONE PTY LTD QU4D 

ICAO Aircraft Address Code: 51546463 

This certificate Is 

D&C INSPECTION SERVICES INC issued for I registration purposes 

s 2215 N REPSDORPH RD only and is not a 

s SEABROOK TX 77586·6445 certificate of title. 

u The Federal Aviation 

E Administration does 

D not determine rights 

of ownership as 

T between private 

0 persons. 

t Corporation 

Aviation 

International 

It is certified 

Adm'tn·tstrafton, 

that 

Civil 

the 

Aviation 

above 

Un'tted 

dated 

described 

States De~mbe>. aircraft of America, 7, has 1944, been In and accordance entered with Title on with 49, the the United register Convention States of the Code, Federal on ~ and U.S. Department regulations issued thereunder. 

DATE OF ISSUE February 5, 2015 

I"Y'~&J 

of 'transportation 

Fe~raf'Aviation EXPIRATION DATE February 28, 2018 -,-~~ : : .. ·Y£tmi@St;~&in 

. -. ----- ··---·-·-

.,. 

z 

0 

I 

6 

P.O. 

Oklahoma City, OK 7312S..Q50

Official Business 

Penalty for Priv:rtc Usc $300 

AC Form 8050-3 (10/2010) Sup

TO: D&C INSPECTIO

2215 N REPSDO

SEABROOK TX 

') j 1 i 1 j Ji I J' 'l j' j 11 i l j i' 1 1 i) i j '1 l. r
The State of TexasAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 23, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00246

- CR

Destyn David FREDERICK

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 09

- 00041

- CRL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s third motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

April 17, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 23rd day of March, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
listed below, of our report dated February 25, 2000, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of SAFLINK Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A Amendment Number 3 to Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 2000:

     .  (Form S-8 No. 333-74253) pertaining to the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan of
        The National Registry, Inc.

     .  (Form S-3 No. 033-62430) pertaining to the registration of shares issued
        in the private placement completed in 1993 and the registration of
        shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants.

     .  (Form S-3 No. 333-75789) pertaining to the registration of shares issued
        in the private placement effected in July 1999, registration of shares
        underlying options granted under the 1992 Stock Incentive Plan, and the
        registration of shares issuable upon conversion of Series C Preferred
        Stock.

     .  (Form S-8 No. 333-23467) pertaining to the registration of 1,332,859
        shares of the Company's common stock.

     .  (Form S-3 No. 333-01510) pertaining to the registration of shares
        issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock.

     .  (Form S-8 No. 033-68832) pertaining to the registration of 1,214,000
        shares which may be offered to certain selling stockholders.

     .  (Form S-3 No. 333-58575) pertaining to the registration of shares
        issuable upon exercise of warrants.

     .  (Form S-3 No. 333-54084) pertaining to the registration of 13,010,706
        shares of common stock.



                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Tampa, Florida
June 20, 2001
#### EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Lola M. HAAS, et al., Appellees. Lola M. HAAS, Appellant, v. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., et al., Appellees. Lola M. HAAS, Appellant, v. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., et al., Appellees. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., Appellant, v. Lola M. HAAS, et al., Appellees. Lola M. HAAS, Appellant, v. EARL A. HOLLIS, INC., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 84-2034, 84-2078, 84-2211, 84-2376 and 85-83.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 29, 1986.

Montgomery, Lytal, Reiter, Denny & Se-arcy, P.A. and Edna L. Caruso of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach for Earl A. Hollis, Inc., et al.

Pruitt & Pruitt and John R. Beranek and Larry Klein of Klein & Beranek, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Lola M. Haas.

Kevin F. Richardson of Clyatt & Richardson, P.A., West Palm Beach for John C. Erickson.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the jury s award to the broker in this case of $470,000 and the trial court’s addition of prejudgment interest. The record supports the award based on implied contract. *Danieli Corporation v. Bryant,*399 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); *Kerdyk v. Hammock Oaks Estates, Inc.,*342 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). We also affirm the trial court’s direction of a verdict in favor of the seller’s agent on the broker’s claim of tortious interference with an advantageous business relationship. *West v. Troelstrup,*367 So.2d 253 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

ANSTEAD and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and GODERICH, MARIO P., Associate Judge, concur.