alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S.M., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee. E.E.G., Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

Nos. 7838, 7866.

Court of Appeals of Alaska.

Nov. 4, 1983.

Jonathon Katcher, Asst. Public Defender and Dana Fabe, Public Defender, Anchorage, for S.M.

Alan Higbie, Lynch, Farney & Crosby, Anchorage, for E.E.G.

Elizabeth H. Sheley, Asst. Dist. Atty., and Victor C. Krumm, Dist. Atty., Anchorage, and Norman C. Gorsuch, Atty. Gen., Juneau, for appellee.

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ.

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

Between April and August 1982, S.M. and her lover, E.E.G., engaged in group oral sex with S.M.’s four-year-old son, R.M. E.E.G. and S.M. pled *nolo contendere*and were convicted of one count each of first-degree sexual assault. AS 11.41.410(a)(3). Judge Buckalew sentenced E.E.G. to eight years’ imprisonment and S.M. to six years with two suspended. E.E.G. and S.M. contend on appeal that their sentences are excessive.

E.E.G. is forty-six years old. He has no prior felony convictions. The record reflects, however, that he had engaged in sexual activities with his own minor children in the past which resulted in some intervention by state agencies. He contends that he acquiesced in the sexual activity instigated by S.M.’s four-year-old child and that he was intoxicated at the time.

S.M. is twenty years old. Her son was born out of wedlock when she was sixteen years of age. She has a juvenile record for burglary, trespass and related property of*895fenses. She apparently did well on juvenile probation and was not under supervision at the time of the instant offense. The trial court found that she was under the domination of E.E.G., thereby justifying a disparate sentence. S.M. indicates that she is very much in love with E.E.G. and hopes to marry him when the two are released from incarceration.

R.M. is currently five years of age. He is in the custody of his grandparents and receiving psychological counseling. He grieves for his mother and is hurt by her absence. He apparently is suffering chronic depression as a result of the enforced separation.

Judge Buckalew carefully considered the offenses and the relative responsibility of the two defendants. He concluded that both were responsible for their acts but that E.E.G., because of his greater age and maturity, should serve a longer sentence. E.E.G.1⁄8 eight-year sentence and S.M.’s six-year sentence with two years suspended are not clearly mistaken. *McClain v. State,*519 P.2d 811, 813-14 (Alaska 1974). They are within the range of sentences appropriate for the conduct involved. *See Langton v. State,*662 P.2d 954 (Alaska App.1983); *State v. Jane Doe,*647 P.2d 1107 (Alaska App.1982).1

The sentences of the superior court are AFFIRMED.

1

. We do not read Judge Buckalew’s findings regarding S.M. as being as favorable to her as Judge Stewart’s findings regarding Jane Doe. Therefore, our suggestion of an upper limit of three years for Jane Doe would be inapplicable to this case.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Miguel VELEZ, Bernardo Vasquez and Carlos Quintero-Cruz.

No. 87-KK-0422.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1987.

In re Velez, Miguel; Vasquez, Bernardo; Quintero-Cruz, Carlos; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 3-86-787, 3-86-112; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-87-0182.

Denied.
#### COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joe WALKER, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

No. 86-610.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

June 26, 1987.

Thomas and Dunahoe, Edwin Dunahoe, Natchitoches, for defendants-appellants.

Ronald E. Corkern, of Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur & Corkern, Natchitoch-es, John W. King, Baton Rouge, Wilson and Walker, Lon P. Wilson, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee.

Joe Walker, in pro. per.

Before DOMENGEAUZ, LABORDE and YELVERTON, Jj.

LABORDE, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial and appeal with a companion suit, *Paige v. Commercial Union Insurance Company,*512 So.2d 507 (La.App. 3d Cir.1987), also decided on this date.

For reasons assigned in the aforesaid case, the judgment appealed from in the instant suit is affirmed. Costs of this appeal are taxed to J¿»e Walker, Jr.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE FINANCE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 28, 2009
                  /s/
      Yizhao ZhangYizhao
      Zhang
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Jerry Boguille, Wife of/and Oscar BROWN, et al. v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERVICE, INC.

No. 87-C-1027.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Boguille, Jerry; Brown, Jerry Bog-uille; Brown, Oscar; Hashek, James R.; Hunt, Cheryl; McMahon, Cheryl Hunt; McMahon, Michael; Mipro, Dorothy; Davis, Dorothy Mipro; Davis, John; Le-Blanc, Debbie; Mipro, Debbie LeBlanc; Mi-pro, Paul; LeBlanc, Jeanette; Cousins, Jeanette LeBlanc; Cousins, Robert; Shelby, Robert; Eckert, Kathleen; Mipro, Kathleen Eckert; Mipro, Robert C.; Le-bouef, Shirley; Kelly, Shirley Lebouef; Kelly, Wemdelaus B. Jr.; Johnson, Pamela B.; Tasker, Barbara S.; Tasker, Donald; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5049; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D”, No. 85-1236.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 621.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and DENNIS, JJ., would grant the writ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY WITH RESPECT TO
                ANNUAL REPORT OF COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION ON
                 FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

         Each of the undersigned appoints each of Jerry L. Mosingo, J. Michael
Stepp and Jay B. Knoll as his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do
any and all acts and things and execute any and all instruments which the
attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable in order to enable Collins &
Aikman Corporation (the "Corporation") to comply with the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and any requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in
connection with the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments thereto, including, but not
limited to, power and authority to sign his or her name (whether on behalf of
the Corporation, or as a director or officer of the Corporation, or by attesting
the seal of the Corporation, or otherwise) to such instruments and to such
Annual Report and any amendments thereto, and to file them with the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The undersigned ratifies and confirms all that any of
the attorneys and agents shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one
of the attorneys and agents shall have, and may exercise, all the powers
conferred by this instrument.

         Each of the undersigned has signed his or her name as of March 2003.

/s/ Charles E. Becker                       /s/ W. Gerald McConnell
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Charles E. Becker                           W. Gerald McConnell

/s/ Dean Robert C. Clark                    /s/ Jerry L. Mosingo
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Dean Robert C. Clark                        Jerry L. Mosingo

/s/ Marshall A. Cohen                       /s/ Senator Warren B. Rudman
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Marshall A. Cohen                           Senator Warren B. Rudman

/s/ David C. Dauch                          /s/ J. Michael Stepp
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
David C. Dauch                              J. Michael Stepp

/s/ Cynthia L. Hess                         /s/ David. A. Stockman
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Cynthia L. Hess                             David. A. Stockman

/s/ Timothy D. Leuliette                    /s/ Daniel P. Tredwell
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Timothy D. Leuliette                        Daniel P. Tredwell

/s/ Elkin McCallum                          /s/ Samuel Valenti III
--------------------------                  ------------------------------
Elkin McCallum                              Samuel Valenti III
#### J. Michael JONES, et al. v. HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK IN NEW ORLEANS, et al.

No. 89-CC-0582.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Hibernia National Bank; Bain, Richard; Burga, Bruce Jr.; Capouch, Jay; Weil, Michael; Martin, Mary 0. Macrea; Yohe, Michael C.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “H”, No. 88-1107; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CW-0130.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 2 of Charys Holding Company, Inc. for the fiscal year ending April
30, 2006, I, Billy V. Ray, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of Charys Holding
Company, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A, Amendment No. 2 for the fiscal
year ending April 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A,
Amendment No. 2 for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2006, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Charys Holding Company, Inc.

     Dated: September 22, 2006.

                                   /s/  Billy V. Ray, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Billy V. Ray, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of
                                   Charys Holding Company, Inc.
Nevada Regional Haze 5

- Year Progress Report, November 2014 

# References

2009 RH SIP. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection, Bureaus of Air Quality Planning and Air Pollution Control , Nevada Regional Haze State Implementation Plan , October 2009

. Carson City, Nevada. < http://ndep.nv.gov/baqp/planmodeling/rhaze.html > (last viewed 6/13 /2014)
USEPA 2013. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and S t andards , Air Quality Policy Division , Geographic Strategies Group , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina , General Principles for the 5

- Year Regional Haze State Implementation Plans (Intended to Assist States and EPA Regional Offices in Development and Rev iew of the Progress Reports) . April 2013. < http://www.4cleanair.org/Documents/haze_5year_4

- 10

- 13.pdf > (last viewed 6/13 /2014)
USEPA 2003. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, Air Quality Trends Analysis Group, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina , Guidance for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions under the Regional Haze Rule . EPA

- 45 4/B

- 03

- 005. September 2003. < http://www.epa.gov/ttn/caaa/t1/memoranda/rh_envcurhr_gd.pdf > (last viewed 6/13 /2014) Weare 2003. Christopher Weare, The California Electricity Cris is: Causes and Policy Options. Public Policy Institute of California. ISBN: 1

- 58213

- 064

- 7

. < http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/R_103CWR.pdf > (last viewed 6/13 /2014) WestJumpAQMS 2013. Western Regional Air Partnership , West

- Wide Jump

- Start Air Quality Modeling Study

– Final Report ( PDF 15MB)

. September 30, 2013 < http://www.wrapair2.org/WestJumpAQMS.aspx > (last viewed 6/13 /2014)
WRAP 2013. Western Regional Air Partnership , Western Regional Air Partnership Regional Haze Rule Reasonable Progress Summary Report . June 28, 2013. < http://www.wrapair2.org/RHRPR.aspx > (last viewed 6/13 /2014)
#### Robert CAMPBELL v. BIC CORPORATION.

No. 88-C-0114.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re BIC Corporation; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0302; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 26198.

*144Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 1138.

Denied.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10.2

   In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Oil and Gas, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael
A. Bardell, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


/s/ Michael A. Bardell




Michael A. Bardell
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


August 19, 2002


<PAGE>
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-13523

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 7:12-cr-00036-HL-TQL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

BACARI MCCARTHREN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

(September 26, 2014)

Before MARTIN, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-13523 Date Filed: 09/26/2014 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Rick Collum, appointed counsel for Bacari McCarthren, has moved to 

withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, 

and McCarthren’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-13523 Date Filed: 09/26/2014 Page: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,272
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   233
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     39,032
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,193
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,279
<LOANS>                                        157,454
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 215,667
<DEPOSITS>                                     199,911
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,050
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,202
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,331
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 215,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,113
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,512
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    85
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,710
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,653
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,731
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,979
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      420
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  89
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,002
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,002
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.18
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    172
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,062
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       22
<RECOVERIES>                                        12
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,472
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                24
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,448


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lorne Broten hereby certifies as follows:

(a)  I am the Chief Financial Officer of Barrington Sciences Corporation (the
     "Company");

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
     the year ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") complies in all material
     respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934, as amended; and

(c)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        BARRINGTON SCIENCES CORPORATION

Date:  May 1, 2007                      /S/ Lorne Broten
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Lorne Broten
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section
15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to
Section 12 of the Act

No annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders of the
Company. The Company does not anticipate sending out a separate annual report or
proxy material to its security holders subsequent to the filing of the annual
report. In the event that the Company determines that it will send out either a
separate annual report or any proxy materials, the Company will furnish copies
of such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission when it is sent to
security holders.
#### Dora Garth BANKS v. STATE.

CR-91-1404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Sept. 30, 1993.

Dora Garth Banks, pro se.

James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Stephen Dodd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*ON RETURN TO REMAND*

McMILLAN, Judge.

This court, in *Banks v. State,*629 So.2d 701 (Ala.Cr.App.1992), remanded this cause to the trial court with instructions that that coui’t make written findings of fact regarding the appellant’s indigency status and whether any proceeding was held concerning appellant’s right to counsel on appeal.

Pursuant to that instruction, the trial court, on return to remand, stated:

> “[The defendant’s] case was set on the regular motion docket with notice given by the clerk. Defendant did not appear and no testimony can be taken without her presence. No findings of fact can be made without testimony. Defendant is on parole and free to come to court if she elects to do so.... This court cannot further respond to the remandment.”

Because the appellant failed to appear at the hearing, her appeal, pursuant to Rule 2(a)(2), AR.App.P., is due to be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

All Judges concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2254 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2254

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Etoxazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Etoxazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ETOXAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.31 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Etoxazole) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### C.R. WALKER v. G.L. CREECH d/b/a Truck Services Hauling and Rentals.

No. 87-C-1535.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Creech, G.L. d/b/a; Truck Services Hauling and Rentals; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0435; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 233013.

Prior report: La.App., 509 So.2d 168.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.