alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Filed 5/13/15 Cruz v. Super. Ct. CA4/2 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION TWO 

PETER CASEY CRUZ, 

 Petitioner, 

v. 

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF 

RIVERSIDE COUNTY, 

 Respondent; 

THE PEOPLE, 

 Real Party in Interest. 

 E063224 

 (Super.Ct.No. RIC463349) 

 OPINION 

 ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of prohibition/mandate. Petition is 

granted. 

 Peter Casey Cruz, in pro. per. 

 No appearance for Respondent. 

 Michael A. Hestrin, District Attorney, and Natalie M. Pitre, Deputy District 

Attorney, for Real Party in Interest. 
2

 Although a proceeding under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (Welf. & Inst. 

Code, §§ 6600 et seq.) is in the nature of a civil proceeding (People v. McDonald (2013) 

214 Cal.App.4th 1367), where a substantial liberty interest is implicated, the technical 

label is not controlling. It is inappropriate to place financial obstacles in the path of one 

seeking to defend such an interest. (See Smith v. Bennett (1961) 365 U.S. 708.) 

 Although the superior court has not filed a response, the People agree that no 

filing fee can be charged to petitioner. The People have also informed this court that the 

explanation for the rejection of petitioner’s paperwork has been deleted from the court’s 

minutes; it is therefore unclear whether the superior court has rethought its position. The 

petition for writ of prohibition/mandate is therefore granted. 

DISPOSITION 

 We issue this order to clarify the rights and obligations of the parties. 

 Let a peremptory writ of prohibition/mandate issue, directing the Superior Court 

of Riverside County to accept for filing, without fee, motions and applications presented 

by petitioner in respect to the proceedings under the Sexually Violent Predators Act. 

Petitioner is directed to prepare and have the peremptory writ of 

prohibition/mandate issued, copies served, and the original filed with the clerk of this 

court, together with proof of service on all parties. 
3

This order shall be final forthwith. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS 

RAMIREZ 

 P. J. 

We concur: 

HOLLENHORST 

 J. 

KING 

 J.
50261.

#### FLINTWOOD, INC. v. JOHNSON.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Following a jury verdict and conforming judgment for the plaintiff Johnson, the trial court granted the defendant corporation’s motion for new trial. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to this judgment in this court on October 25, 1974, which recited that the judgment appealed from was filed for record on September 27, 1974. This appeal has subsequently been withdrawn by Johnson, this appeal being No. 50260.

The subject record (case No. 50261) is a cross appeal from the same judgment, as to which the notice of appeal *79was filed in this court on November 15, 1974. It appears that Flintwood, Inc. was served with the notice of appeal in the main case on September 25, 1974, the date the judgment was in fact signed.

Submitted February 11, 1975

Decided February 20, 1975.

*Ralph C. Smith, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William D. Harrell, Hugh B. McNatt,*for appellee.

Code Ann. § 6-803 requires that notices of appeal be filed within 30 days of the entry of an appealable judgment and notices of cross appeal within *15 days from service of the notice of appeal*in the main case by the appellant. Accordingly, disregarding any other questions, it appears that the notice of cross appeal was filed more than 15 days after service and more than 45 days after the notice of appeal. This court therefore has no jurisdiction to entertain it. Furthermore, in view of the dismissal of the main appeal, its consideration is unnecessary. *Foley v. Shanahan,*133 Ga. App. 262 (2) (211 SE2d 367); *Wood v. Atkinson,*229 Ga. 179 (190 SE2d 46).

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.*
#### J.C. LaCAZE, et ux. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

No. 89-C-1331.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re LaCaze, J.C.; LaCaze, Ernestine Breville; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of *1225certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-0861; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 53141B.

Prior report: La.App., 541 So.2d 322.

Denied.

CALOGERO and MARCUS, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### LOUISIANA RESOURCES COMPANY v. Lawrence NOEL, et al. LOUISIANA RESOURCES COMPANY v. Olton NOEL, et al.

No. 86-C-2215.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 12, 1986.

In re Noel, Lawrence; Noel, Olton; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-955, 85-956; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. *“I”,*Nos. 82-45402, 82-45403.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 1024.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0014

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JACK WARREN MAXVILL, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 1, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 27 2021

08/27/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                         5
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,291,000
<SECURITIES>                                   2,550,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     14,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,877,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,963,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,877,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 326,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 339,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (13,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (13,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (55,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (68,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Sylvester MILES, Jr. v. Hilton BUTLER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-1275.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Miles, Sylvester Jr.; applying for remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Franklin, 5th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 18697.

Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not already done so, on the post-conviction petition submitted on or about March 21, 1985, if it has been filed.
#### James Lee STEWART v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58453.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1989.

James Lee Stewart, Parchman, pro se.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Harrison S. Ford, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ANDERSON and BLASS, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Derek A. BROADNAX.

No. 86-KO-2499.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Broadnax, Derek A.; applying for remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA 4054; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 298-966.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 511.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Richard L. DYSON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-0092.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Dyson, Richard L.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 2-86-1062.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the district court for consideration.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2437 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain emergency 

illumination lights designed for use in aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain emergency illumination lights designed for 

use in aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION LIGHTS 

4 DESIGNED FOR USE IN AIRCRAFT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.85 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain lights designed for use in aircraft) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking the article description and in9 serting the following: ‘‘Exterior aircraft lights for ilVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:21 Nov 03, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2437.IS S2437

pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2437 IS

1 luminating emergency escape routes and slides (pro2 vided for in subheading 9405.40.60)’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

7 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

8 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Enterasys Networks, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-83991, 333-66774, and 333-103587) on Form S-8 of Enterasys Networks,
Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of Enterasys Networks, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 3,
2004 and December 28, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years ended January 3, 2004 and December 28, 2002, and for
the ten-months ended December 29, 2001, which report appears in the January 3,
2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Enterasys Networks, Inc.

Our audit report refers to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill and
other intangible assets. Our audit report also refers to a change in the method
of accounting for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          Financial Data Schedule



This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheet, Consolidated Statement of Operations,
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Investment,
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and Notes to Consolidated Statements,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
and notes to Consolidated Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         766,428
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  305,942
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     76,645
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,809,095
<PP&E>                                       8,289,947
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,748,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,780,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,203,273
<BONDS>                                      8,711,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        295
<COMMON>                                         3,280
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,907,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,780,590
<SALES>                                      6,895,753
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,895,753
<CGS>                                        5,865,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,865,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             680,661
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,849,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                   538,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,310,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,310,592
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dov Charney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/    DOV
CHARNEY                                                             
|                      |  |     |  | Dov Charney President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Evon Au hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Thai One On, Inc.,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Thai One On, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.
                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: August 14, 2005                /s/ Evon Au
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   By: Evon Au, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   President and Chairman of the Board
Exhibit 4.2


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated December 9, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2043 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-250028) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 9, 2020
#### LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. James HEMPHILL, et al. Charles HEMPHILL, et al. v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 87-C—2148.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the *462Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. CA86-0788, CA86-0789; Parish of LaSalle, 28th Judicial District Court, Nos. 20303, 20571.

Prior reports: La.App., 510 So.2d 1386, 510 So.2d 1390.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 17-1849 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. ISIDRO SUAREZ-REYES, Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET** The opinion of this Court issued on December 14, 2018, is amended as follows: On page 4, line 1, replace the year "2017" with "2018."
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P.
(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            August
      12, 2008
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2422 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather upper sports footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain leather upper 

sports footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LEATHER UPPER SPORTS FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2422 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Tennis shoes, basketball 

shoes, and the like with outer 

soles of rubber, plastic, leather, or composition leather 

and uppers of leather, valued 

at more than $2.50 per pair, 

the foregoing for persons 

other than women (provided 

for in subheading 

6403.99.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS