1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 19 V

Filed: September 24 , 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * UNPUBLISHED

KIM EILEEN RICH

, *

* Special Master Gowen

Petitioner, *

* M otion for attorneys ’ fees and cost s ;

v. *

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Sol P. Ajalat

, Ajalat & Ajalat

, North Hollywood, CA

, for petitioner

. Alexis B. Babcock

, United States Department of Justice, Washington , DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 1

On January 7 , 20 1 4

, Kim Eileen Rich (“ petitioner ”) filed a petition pursuant to the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

. 2 42 U .S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2006).

Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving a Tetanus

- diptheria

- acellular

- pertussis (“Tdap”)

vaccine on January 12, 2011

, she developed an acquired demyelinating neuropathy, likely

Guillain Barre Syndrome (“GBS”)

. Petition ¶ ¶ 3, 8, filed Jan. 7 , 2014

. On September 23, 2014

, the parties filed a stipulation in which they agreed to an award of compensation to petitioner . On

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the undersigned’s action in this case,

the undersigned intends to post this ruling on the website of the United States Court of Federal

Claims, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, § 205, 116

Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). As provided by

Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any

information furnished by that party: (1) that is a tra de secret or commercial or financial in

substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the

disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule

18(b).

2 The Natio nal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National

Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended,

42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa

- 1 to

- 34 (2006) (Vaccine Act or the Act). All citations in thi s decision to

individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C.A. § 300aa.2

that same day, I issued a Decision adopting the parties’ stipulation for an award. See Decision

on J. Stip., filed Sept. 23, 2014.

On September 18 , 2014, petitioner filed a n unopposed motion for attorneys’ fees and

costs

. Petitioner requests a total award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,500.00. In

accordance wi th General Order #9, petitioner ’ s counsel states that petitioner personally incurr ed

costs related to the prosecution of this case in the amount of $ 580

. 14

. See Motion for Fees and

Costs

, filed Sept. 18 , 2014. On September 24, 2014, my chambers confirmed with respondent’s

counsel that petitioner’s motion for fees is not opposed and that a decision can be issued on this

matter.

The Vaccine Act permits an award of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. §

300 aa

- 15(e). Based on the reasonableness of petitioner’s motion , the undersigned GRANTS the

request for approval and payment of attorneys’ fees and costs.

Accordingly, an award should be made as follows:

(1) in the form of a check jointly payable to petitioner and to petitioner’s attorney, Sol B.

Ajalat , of Ajalat & Ajalat, LLP , in the amount of $ 20,500.00 , and

(2) in the form of a check payable to petitioner only in the amount of $ 580.14

.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of

the cour t SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance herewith

. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas L. Gowen

Thomas L. Gowen

Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of

notice renouncing the right to seek review.