alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert L. HART, Appellant, v. ATLANTIC INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT CORP., et al., Appellees.

No. 87-144.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Oct. 8, 1987.

*769Dan R. Warren of Judge & Warren, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

William A. Barr of Raymond, Wilson, Conway, Barr, Millis & Hahl, P.A., Dayto-na Beach, for appellees Robert N. Hartman and Albert W. Gault.

No appearance for appellee Atlantic International Inv. Corp.

COWART, Judge.

The then owner of certain real property instituted a law action contesting the 1976 ad valorem tax assessment on the basis that the County Property Appraiser failed to give sufficient consideration to the effect on the value of the land of certain governmental pollution control permits and of a governmental moratorium on development and improvement of the land. The trial court held for the County Property Appraiser. On appeal the appellate court agreed with the landowner and remanded for a redetermination of the proper assessed value for that year. *Atlantic International Corp. v. Turner,*381 So.2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA), *cert. denied,*388 So.2d 1119 (Fla.1980).

Although the appellate mandate issued on March 24, 1980, no action was taken in the trial court until December 24, 1986, when the County Property Appraiser filed a motion for judgment in accordance with the mandate. On that same date, appellant served a motion to intervene, alleging that during the interim, he had become the owner of the land in question and desired to participate in the determination of the proper assessed value of the land in 1976 and the resulting taxes that would thereby become a lien on his land. The trial court denied the motion to intervene on the ground that the motion was untimely. We reverse the order denying appellant’s motion to intervene and remand with directions to the trial court either to grant the motion to intervene or to treat it as a motion for substitution (Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.260(c)) and to grant it. As the present owner of the land, appellant is affected by, and is entitled to be heard as to, the substantive issues involved in this litigation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 2 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 2

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
       require two-thirds majorities for bills increasing taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

   Mr. Kyl (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Allard, Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. 
 Brownback, Mr. Coverdell, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Frist, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Grams, 
    Mr. Hagel, Mr. Helms, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Mack, Mr. 
 McConnell, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, and 
Mr. Thompson) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
       require two-thirds majorities for bills increasing taxes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Any bill to levy a new tax or increase the rate or 
base of any tax may pass only by a two-thirds majority of the whole 
number of each House of Congress.
    ``Section 2. The Congress may waive section 1 when a declaration of 
war is in effect. The Congress may also waive section 1 when the United 
States is engaged in military conflict which causes an imminent and 
serious threat to national security and is so declared by a joint 
resolution, adopted by a majority of the whole number of each House, 
which becomes law. Any provision of law which would, standing alone, be 
subject to section 1 but for this section and which becomes law 
pursuant to such a waiver shall be effective for not longer than 2 
years.
    ``Section 3. All votes taken by the House of Representatives or the 
Senate under this article shall be determined by yeas and nays and the 
names of persons voting for and against shall be entered on the Journal 
of each House respectively.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 182

    Designating October 1999 as ``National Stamp Collecting Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 1999

    Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating October 1999 as ``National Stamp Collecting Month''.

Whereas over 150 years ago, United States commemorative stamps began honoring 
        the people, places, and events that have shaped our Nation's history;
Whereas in 1999, more than 22,000,000 Americans, including children, collect and 
        learn about our Nation through stamps, making stamp collecting one of 
        the most popular hobbies in our Nation and the world;
Whereas as we stand on the threshold of the 21st century, it is important that 
        we pause to reflect on our Nation's history;
Whereas stamps honor statesmen and soldiers who fought for freedom and 
        democracy, recognize our Nation's scientific and technological 
        achievements, pay tribute to our Nation's artistic legacy, and celebrate 
        the strength of our Nation's diversity;
Whereas starting October 1, 1999, ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' will 
        transform more than 100,000 schools, libraries, and post offices into 
        learning centers where our Nation's young people can honor the past and 
        celebrate the future through stamps;
Whereas the founders and participants of ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' 
        include millions of adult and youth collectors, thousands of teachers 
        and schools, the American Philatelic Society, and the United States 
        Postal Service;
Whereas the people, places, and events shaping America today will be United 
        States commemorative stamps tomorrow;
Whereas ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' will help empower our Nation's 
        children and future generations to study and learn from our Nation's 
        history; and
Whereas as our Nation's children learn the lessons of the past, the children 
        will be better prepared to guide our Nation in the future: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates October 1999 as ``National 
Stamp Collecting Month''.
                                 <all>
```
J

- S09010

- 16

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENN SYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. STEPHEN A. EVANS Appellant No. 1179 MDA 2015

Appeal from the PCRA Order May 5 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 22

- CR

- 0000448

- 2010

BEFORE: PANELLA, J., LAZARUS, J., and JENKINS, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY PANELLA, J. FILED MARCH 15, 2016 Appellant, Stephen A. Evans, appeals from the order dismissing his petition pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”) without a hearing. After a careful review, we f ind that all of Evans’s issues on appeal have been waived due to his failure to file a statement of matters complained of on appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b). We therefore affirm. A jury convicted Evans of multiple counts arising from a jewelry store robbery. After exhausting his direct appellate rights, Evans filed a timely pro

se PCRA petition. Counsel was appointed to represent Evans, but she subsequently was released from the case by the PCRA court. The PCRA court gave notice of its intent to dismiss Evans’s petition without a hearing. After reviewing Evans’s pro se response, the PCRA court entered an order dismissing the petition on May 5, 2015. This timely appeal followed.J

- S09010

- 16

- 2

-

On July 15, 2015, the PCRA court direct ed Evans to file a statement of matters complained of an appeal pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(1). Evans concedes that he never filed a response to the trial court’s order. See Appellant’s Reply Brief, at 5.
In Commonwealth v. Castillo , 888 A.2d 775, 780 (P a. 2005), our Supreme Court reaffirmed the bright

- line rule announced in Commonwealth v. Lord , 719 A.2d 306 (Pa. 1998), requiring appellants to comply with trial court orders for a Rule 1925(b) statement. The decision in Lord made it clear that any issues not raised in a Rule 1925(b) statement will be deemed waived. See 719 A.2d at 309. The Castillo Court expressly disapproved of prior decisions that carved out exceptions to that rule. See 888 A.2d at 780. We recently reiterated the “automatic nature” of th e waiver of issues for failure to comply with Rule 1925(b) and that “we are required to address the issue once it comes to our attention.” Greater Erie Indus. Development Corp. v. Presque Isle Downs, Inc. , 88 A.3d 222, 224 (Pa. Super. 2014) ( en banc ). In P resque Isle Downs , the en banc panel examined Pennsylvania Supreme Court cases construing Rule 1925(b) and noted that “our Supreme Court does not countenance anything less than stringent application of waiver pursuant” to that rule. Id . (citation omitted). Accordingly, Evans has waived his issues on appeal. See Pa.R.A.P.J

- S09010

- 16

- 3

-

1925(b)(4)(vii) (“I ssues not included in the Statement and/or not raised in accordance with the provisions of this paragraph (b)(4) are waived.”). Order affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 3/15/2016
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APAC Customer
Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Theodore G. Schwartz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Marc T. Tanenberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:


        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Theodore G. Schwartz
----------------------------------------
Name: Theodore G. Schwartz
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 18, 2003

/s/ Marc T. Tanenberg
----------------------------------------
Name: Marc T. Tanenberg
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 18, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Wandalyn FIELDS v. GULF OIL COMPANY, Munford, Inc., Purolator Armored, Inc., and/or Purolator Courier Corporation, Joe D. Hoskins and Norman Brown.

No. 88-C-0123.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Fields, Wandalyn; Anderson, Ton-itte; Pierre, Paola; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7573; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 84-11311.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1190.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 31 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 31

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   granting the President the authority to exercise an item veto of 
          individual appropriations in an appropriations bill

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 1999

 Mr. Allard introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
   granting the President the authority to exercise an item veto of 
          individual appropriations in an appropriations bill

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within 7 years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. The President shall have the power to disapprove any 
appropriation of an appropriations bill at the time the President 
approves the bill. The appropriations in the bill not disapproved shall 
become law upon approval by the President.
    ``Section 2. If the President disapproves an appropriation pursuant 
to this article, in signing the bill containing the appropriation, the 
President shall return a copy of the disapproved appropriation, with a 
statement of the reasons for the disapproval, to the House in which the 
appropriations bill originated. The House in which the appropriations 
bill originated may then reconsider the disapproved appropriation in a 
bill as provided for a bill returned by the President under section 7 
of article I. If the bill is approved as provided under section 7 of 
article I it shall become law.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, G.J. Hart, ChiefExecutive Officer of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarterly period ended June 24, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 1,  2008 | By:    | /s/  G.J.  HART           |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                |
|                       |   | G.J. Hart                      |
|                       |   | President, Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
# Eiropas Savienības C 88I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 088I |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 63. gadagājums2020. gada 17. marts |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 088I

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

63. gadagājums2020. gada 17. marts

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Paziņojumi |
| | EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI |
| | Padome |
| 2020/C 88 I/01 | Paziņojums tās personas ievērībai, kurai piemēro ierobežojošos pasākumus, kas paredzēti Padomes Lēmumā 2013/184/KĀDP un Padomes Regulā (ES) Nr. 401/2013 par ierobežojošiem pasākumiem pret Mjanmu/Birmu | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

IV   Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Padome

2020/C 88 I/01

Paziņojums tās personas ievērībai, kurai piemēro ierobežojošos pasākumus, kas paredzēti Padomes Lēmumā 2013/184/KĀDP un Padomes Regulā (ES) Nr. 401/2013 par ierobežojošiem pasākumiem pret Mjanmu/Birmu

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

IV Paziņojumi

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS IESTĀŽU UN STRUKTŪRU SNIEGTI PAZIŅOJUMI

Padome

| 17.3.2020 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CI 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2020

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CI 88/1

---

Paziņojums tās personas ievērībai, kurai piemēro ierobežojošos pasākumus, kas paredzēti Padomes Lēmumā 2013/184/KĀDP un Padomes Regulā (ES) Nr. 401/2013 par ierobežojošiem pasākumiem pret Mjanmu/Birmu

(2020/C 88 I/01)

Šeit sniegtā informācija ir paredzēta Than Oo kunga, personas, kas minēta pielikumā Padomes Lēmumam 2013/184/KĀDP (1) un IV pielikumā Padomes Regulai (ES) Nr. 401/2013 (2) par ierobežojošiem pasākumiem pret Mjanmu/Birmu, ievērībai.

Padome gatavojas saglabāt ierobežojošos pasākumus pret minēto personu, pievienojot jaunu pamatojumu. Minētā persona ar šo tiek informēta, ka, lai saņemtu paredzēto pamatojumu attiecībā uz viņa iekļaušanu sarakstā, tā līdz 2020. gada 25. martam var iesniegt lūgumu Padomei, to nosūtot uz šādu adresi:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| RELEX.1.C |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

RELEX.1.C

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

E-pasts: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu.

Visi saņemtie apsvērumi tiks ņemti vērā sarakstu periodiskā pārskatīšanā, ko Padome veic saskaņā ar Lēmuma 2013/184/KĀDP 12. pantu un Regulas (ES) Nr. 401/2013 4.i. panta 4. punktu.

Attiecīgās personas uzmanība tiek vērsta arī uz iespēju Padomes lēmumu apstrīdēt Eiropas Savienības Vispārējā tiesā saskaņā ar nosacījumiem, kas paredzēti Līguma par Eiropas Savienības darbību 275. panta otrajā daļā un 263. panta ceturtajā un sestajā daļā.

---

(1)  Padomes Lēmums 2013/184/KĀDP (2013. gada 22. aprīlis) par ierobežojošiem pasākumiem pret Mjanmu/Birmu un ar ko atceļ Lēmumu 2010/232/KĀDP (OV L 111, 23.4.2013., 75. lpp.).

(2)  OV L 121, 3.5.2013., 1. lpp.

---
#### Yasmani DIAZ, a minor By and Through his parents Eladio and Maria DIAZ, Appellants, v. The ORION INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 86-2679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1987.

Gerald E. Rosser, Stabinski & Funt, Miami, for appellants.

James C. Blecke, Goodman & Hochman, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See O’Donnell v. Colonial Penn Ins. Co.,*509 So.2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Edwin C. Quattlebaum, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, President and
Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the "Registrant"),
certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) for the period ended March 31, 2005 of
the Registrant (the "Report"):

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

           By:                     /s/ EDWIN C. QUATTLEBAUM
              ------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Edwin C. Quattlebaum, Ph.D.
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, PRESIDENT AND CO-CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF
                                         DIRECTORS OF
                                       METAMORPHIX, INC.

Date:  December 15, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7447]



[[Page 18216]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday April 6, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the event that the times 
or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted 
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-7447 Filed 3-23-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 26, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Tanner,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Steven Tanner           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 10, 2004  |

 

----