alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Frederick F. Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |              |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |              |
| Chief Executive Officer |              |
|                    |              |
|                    | May 12, 2008 |   |
|                         |                   |        |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 43 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that the President of the United 
    States should encourage free and fair elections and respect for 
                           democracy in Peru.

Whereas presidential and congressional elections are scheduled to occur in Peru 
        on April 9, 2000;
Whereas independent election monitors, including the Organization of American 
        States, the National Democratic Institute, and the Carter Center, have 
        expressed grave doubts about the fairness of the electoral process due 
        to the Peruvian Government's control of key official electoral agencies, 
        systematic restrictions on freedom of the press, manipulation of the 
        judicial processes to stifle independent reporting on radio, television, 
        and newspaper outlets, and harassment and intimidation of opposition 
        politicians, which have greatly limited the ability of opposing 
        candidates to campaign freely; and
Whereas the absence of free and fair elections in Peru would constitute a major 
        setback for the Peruvian people and for democracy in the hemisphere, 
        could result in instability in Peru, and could jeopardize United States 
        antinarcotics objectives in Peru and the region: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the sense of 
Congress that the President of the United States should promptly convey 
to the President of Peru that if the April 9, 2000, elections are not 
deemed by the international community to have been free and fair, the 
United States will review and modify as appropriate its political, 
economic, and military relations with Peru, and will work with other 
democracies in this hemisphere and elsewhere toward a restoration of 
democracy in Peru.

            Passed the Senate April 7, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 43

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of Congress that the President of the United 
    States should encourage free and fair elections and respect for 
                           democracy in Peru.
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4969

_____________________________

RAYMOND PADILLA,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

July 10, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Raymond Padilla, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant 

General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      597
<ALLOWANCES>                                        93
<INVENTORY>                                      1,073
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,610
<PP&E>                                          10,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                     825
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,636
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,636
<SALES>                                          1,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,728
<CGS>                                            4,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,691)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,691)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Leroy M. SMITH v. Hon. Patrick G. QUINLAN, Judge.

No. 86-KH-2061.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Smith, Leroy M.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 282-967.

Denied. No petition by relator can be found in the district court. Relator may re-submit his application to the district court.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 102

Appointing Patricia Mack Bryan as Senate Legal Counsel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed

to

RESOLUTION

Appointing Patricia Mack Bryan as Senate Legal Counsel.

1 Resolved, That the appointment of Patricia Mack

2 Bryan, of Virginia, to be Senate Legal Counsel, made by

3 the President pro tempore of the Senate on May 13, 1999,

4 shall become effective as of June 1, 1999, and the term

5 of service of the appointee shall expire at the end of the

6 107th Congress.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Main Street andMain Incorporated (the “Company”) for the year ended December 29, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, William G. Shrader,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ William G. Shrader        |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| William G. Shrader            |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
|                          |
| Date:  July 2, 2004 |

 

----
#### Samuel HARRIS v. Stafford PINESET, et al.

No. 87-C-0244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Stafford Pineset; Republic Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18185-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 313079.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 499.

Denied.
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-31737, No. 333-66305, and No. 333-115591) on Form S-8 of New
Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 13, 2007 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 which report appears in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.





/s/ Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.


West Peabody, Massachusetts

March 20, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 40 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 40

 Providing for the appointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 29, 2000

 Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Frist) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for the appointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of 
          the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of resignation of Louis Gerstner of New York, is filled by the 
appointment of Alan G. Spoon of Maryland. The appointment is for a term 
of 6 years and shall take effect on the date of enactment of this joint 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. ANDRES MIGUEL MORALES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 100 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 168 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 168

                 Paying a gratuity to Mary Lyda Nance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 1999

     Mr. Helms (for himself and Mr. Biden) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                 Paying a gratuity to Mary Lyda Nance.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate is authorized and 
directed to pay, from the contingent fund of the Senate, to Mary Lyda 
Nance, widow of Admiral James W. Nance, an employee of the Senate at 
the time of his death, the sum of $200,000, that sum to be considered 
inclusive of funeral expenses and all other allowances.
                                 <all>
```
#### Sherry CROCKETT v. Emmett Eugene CROCKETT, Jr.

No. 87-CC-0735.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1987.

In re Crockett, Emmett Eugene Jr.; applying for supervisory or remedial writ; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 339-454; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW 87 0422.

Writ granted in part. Otherwise denied. The sentence for contempt is reduced to coincide with time already served.

LEMMON, J., would simply grant the writ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KATHLEEN GRANAHAN KANE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 414 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Movant Stan J. Caterbone’s “Request to Appear Pro Se and to File an Amicus 

Curiae Brief” in support of petitioner is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of PLM Equipment Growth Fund IV Liquidating Trust (the "Trust"), on Form 10-KSB for the period from September 30, 2003 (inception) through December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Trustee and of the Trust, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Trust filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the net assets in liquidation and changes in net assets in liquidation of the Trust.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 March 25, 2004
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**






Certification
      by the Chief Financial Officer


of


Boardwalk
      GP, LLC


pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk
      GP, LLC hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the quarterly report
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, (the "Report") of
      Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (the "Partnership") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Income
      of
      the Partnership.






November
        8, 2006




/ *s/
      Jamie L. Buskill*


Jamie
      L.
      Buskill


Vice-President
      and Chief Financial Officer


(principal
      financial officer)
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.09 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40526 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ERNESTO RIVERA

- FLORES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12

- CR

- 1040

- 1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ernesto Rivera

Flores has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rivera

- Flores h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion sho uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 2 1 , 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40526 Document: 00512540646 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2014No. 13

- 40526

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to wit hdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40526 Document: 00512540646 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2014
#### Juniper Lee THOMPSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-84-52.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 11, 1985.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1986.

E. Alvin Schay, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

PARKS, Presiding Judge:

Juniper Lee Thompson was tried by jury in the District Court of Comanche County, *937Case No. CRF-83-108, for the offense of Murder in the First Degree. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and set punishment at life imprisonment. The trial court imposed judgment and sentence in accord with the jury’s verdict, and we affirm.

On the afternoon of February 11, 1983, the appellant shot and killed Wallace Tatum following an argument at the home of George Robinson in Lawton, Oklahoma. An autopsy revealed Tatum died from a massive brain injury, inflicted by a blast from appellant’s .12 gauge shotgun. Several eyewitnesses at the Robinson home saw appellant kill Tatum. At trial, appellant claimed the shooting was accidental.

In his lone assignment of error, the appellant claims he was unlawfully prejudiced by the admission of State’s Exhibit No. 3, a photograph depicting the victim’s head and upper body. We disagree with this assertion. The legal standard upon which we will review any claim relating to admission of death photographs is found in *Nuckols v. State,*690 P.2d 463 (Okl.Cr.1984), wherein we stated:

> [Ajdmission of photographs rests largely within the discretion of the trial judge, whose ruling will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. *Glidewell v. State,*626 P.2d 1351 (Okl.Cr.1981). An abuse of discretion will be found, however, when the photographs are gruesome, and their probative value is substantially outweighed by potential prejudice to the accused. *Oxendine v. State,*335 P.2d 940 (Okl.Cr.1958); 12 O.S.1981, § 2403.

As in *Nuckols,*the single photograph in this case was not so gruesome as to be inadmissible. Furthermore, the photograph did corroborate the findings of the medical examiner regarding the victim’s wound. *Id.*at 470. *See also Stafford v. State,*669 P.2d 285 (Okl.Cr.1983), case remanded on other grounds, 104 S.Ct. 2652 (1984). We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in allowing admission of State’s Exhibit No. 3. This assignment of error is without merit.

The judgment and sentence of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

BRETT and BUSSEY, JJ„ concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Bennie Marshall v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0246.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Marshall, Bennie; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 310-678; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-6969.

Denied.
#### Charles A. DAMIANO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-2587.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Robert L. Bogen of Braverman & Bogen, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Christopher v. State,*489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986); *Remp v. State,*248 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.