alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---



Exhibit 13.1

In
  connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”)
  on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne J. Babcock,
  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

| | • | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | • | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Wayne J. Babcock                                                                 | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Wayne J. Babcock 
        President and Chief Executive Officer
      March 29, 2005 | 

---
# PAA--20JD- 01

# '7~

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 

# 11Ybl if1 

# -- Regional Airline Association Da\'e Loiterer 

# 11 

# bq )/1 ~ Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 

# 1

~ 

# iI 

# --- ATA Craig Fabian 

# q,'}~Jrf1

# --
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2460 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dilauroyl peroxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on dilauroyl peroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DILAUROYL PEROXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Dilauroyl peroxide (CAS No. 

105–74–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2915.90.50) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2460 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30,  2006 towhich this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgatedunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and theExchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to theextent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date:  August 14, 2006** |                                           |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ Dale B. Herbst                             |   |
|                       | Name: Dale B. Herbst                           |
|                       | Title: Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

 

----
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Rejection letter for petition for reconsideration.
#### James FINLEY, et al., Appellants, v. Jerry D. PLUMB, et al., Appellees.

No. 87-1492.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 10, 1988.

*363R. David Ayers, Jr., Winter Park, for appellants.

Martin B. Unger and A. Scott Noecker, of Taraska, Grower, Unger and Ketcham, P.A., Orlando, for appellee Travelers Indemnity Co.

No Appearance, for appellee Plumb.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *American States Insurance Co. v. Kelley,*446 So.2d 1085 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).

COBB, COWART and DANIEL, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7245]



[[Page 18106]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 64

[CG Docket No. 10-51; FCC 11-54]


Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is correcting a 
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register of September 26, 2011. 
The document announces the effective date of rules containing 
information collection requirements approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget that were adopted by the FCC to prevent fraud, 
waste, and abuse in the Video Relay Service (VRS) industry.

DATES: Effective September 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Hlibok, Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 559-
5158, or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5a1d283f3d352823741236333835311a3c3939743d352c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b48196949c818addbb9f9a919c98b3959090dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document makes the following 
corrections to the final rule published September 26, 2011, 76 FR 
59269:
    On page 59270, column 2, correct paragraph (c) to read as follows:
    (c) Data Filed with the Fund Administrator to Support Payment 
Claims. TRS providers shall provide the following data associated with 
each TRS call for which a TRS provider seeks compensation in its filing 
with the Fund Administrator: (1) The call record ID sequence; (2) CA ID 
number; (3) session start and end times; (4) conversation start and end 
times; (5) incoming telephone number and IP address (if call originates 
with an IP-based device) at the time of call; (6) outbound telephone 
number and IP address (if call terminates with an IP-based device) at 
the time of call; (7) total conversation minutes; (8) total session 
minutes; (9) the call center (by assigned center ID number) that 
handles the call; and (10) the URL address through which the call was 
initiated.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7245 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Delbert Wayne ADAIR, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-83-766.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 17, 1985.

David L. Miller, Assistant Public Defender, Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Susan Stewart Dickerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

Delbert Wayne Adair was convicted in Oklahoma County District Court of Murder in the First Degree and of Assault and Battery with a Dangerous Weapon. He received sentences of life imprisonment and ten years’ imprisonment, respectively.

He makes only one assignment of error on appeal. Appellant claims the trial court erred in refusing to give the jury the following instruction.

> The presence of ‘malice’ as that term is used within these instructions, is essential for the homicide to constitute first degree murder, and requires that the defendant have killed with a previously formed or deliberate purpose in premedi-ation. [sic] Malice and heat of passion cannot co-exist. The distinction between murder and voluntary manslaughter is found in the dividing line between deliberate action on the one hand and action which is not deliberate or action done in heat of passion. In determining whether the act which caused death was impelled by malice, all the surrounding circumstances and conditions of the parties are to be taken into consideration, including previous relations and conditions connected with the tragedy as well as those existing at the time of the killing.

The court instructed the jury on the charges of Murder in the First Degree, Murder in the Second Degree, and First Degree Manslaughter, using essentially the Uniform Jury Instructions. Appellant complains that without his requested instruction, the jury was not allowed to look at surrounding conditions or circumstances existing at the time of the crime in judging his intent, and were thereby prevented from considering the manslaughter charge.

Our review of the record indicates that the jury was specifically instructed that they could consider the external circumstances. The trial court instructed the jury using OUJI — CR 429 that:

> *769The external circumstances surrounding the commission of the homicidal act may be considered in finding whether or not deliberate intent existed in the mind of the Defendant to take a human life. External circumstances include words, conduct, demeanor, motive and all other circumstances connected with a homicidal act.

The instructions given by the trial court fairly and accurately stated the applicable law. This being so, we cannot say the court abused its discretion in giving the instructions it did and in refusing that offered by appellant. *Green v. State,*611 P.2d 262 (Okl.Cr.1980). The instructions concerning premeditation and provocation were both explicit and accurate and properly guided the jury in their evaluation.

Finding no error warranting reversal or modification, judgments and sentences are AFFIRMED.

PARKS, P.J., concurs in Results.

BRETT, J., concurs.
#### Danny HOWZE, et al. v. COMMERCIAL UNION INSURANCE COMPANIES.

No. 87-C-1105.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Howze, Danny; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA85 1507; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 43862.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 847.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
Motion Granted , Appeal and Cross
- Appeal Dismisse d, and Memorandum

Opinion filed September 2, 2021
.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14
- 2 1
- 00 176
- CV

DEFENSE ENERGY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE D/B/A NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATOR, A TEXAS NON
- PROFIT CORPORATION; AND NATIONAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGY ACCELERATOR, A NORTH CAROLINA NON
- PROFIT CORPORATION , Appellant s / Cross
- Appellees

V. NSTI, LLC D/B/A TECHCONNECT , Appellee / Cross
- Appellant

On Appeal from the 334 th District Co urt

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018
- 06530

MEMORANDUM OPINION This proceeding comprises an appeal and a cross

- appeal from a final judgment signed December 28, 2020 . On August 13, 2021 , the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal and cross

- appeal as they have settled their dispute, and they have2

agreed they will bear their own costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1 (a) . The motion is granted , and the appeal and cross

- appeal are dismissed. Each party will bear its own costs in this proceeding.
PER CURIAM Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Poissant.
#### Shalom Daniel SELTZER v. Jan Phyllis Spizer SELTZER.

No. 89-CC-1571.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Seltzer, Shalom Daniel; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-1165; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “F”, No. 88-00611.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Darryl DRONET.

No. 88-K-0548.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1988.

In re Dronet, Darryl; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR87-0584; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 12216-85.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 773.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 214

Authorizing the taking of photographs in the Chamber of the United States

Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Authorizing the taking of photographs in the Chamber of

the United States Senate.

1 Resolved, That paragraph 1 of rule IV of the Rules

2 for the Regulation of the Senate Wing of the United

3 States Capitol (prohibiting the taking of pictures in the

4 Senate Chamber) be temporarily suspended for the sole

5 and specific purpose of permitting photographs to be

6 taken between the first and second sessions of the 106th

7 Congress in order to allow the Senate Commission on Art

8 to carry out its responsibilities to publish a Senate docu9 ment containing works of art, historical objects, and exhib10 its within the Senate Wing.
2

•SRES 214 ATS

1 SEC. 2. The Sergeant at Arms of the Senate is au2 thorized and directed to make the necessary arrangements

3 to carry out this resolution.

Æ
From: Foss, Ian

To: debora_threadgill@baylor.edu

Subject: Comments to Proposed Reaffirmation Agreement Form

Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:33:00 PM

Attachments: ED-2015-ICCD-0007-0005.html

1845-XXXX_REA_20150408_Clean.docx

Hi Debora,

Thank you for your comments on our proposed reaffirmation form (attached). We believe that the

 revisions we have made to the reaffirmation form to explicitly require the student to involve the

 school, and requiring the borrower to grant authorization to the loan holder/servicer to send the

 completed reaffirmation agreement to the school. You may be seeing inconsistency in current

 servicer practices because, sometimes, the school that is working with the borrower is not currently

 associated with the student (to the servicer) and so the servicer has privacy concerns about sending

 the reaffirmation agreement to the school. By signing the reaffirmation form, the borrower is

 agreeing to allow the servicer to send confirmation to the school.

Ian Foss
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 94 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.94
                                         Agreed to March 9, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, March 9, 2000, or Friday, March 10, 2000, on a motion offered 
pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his 
designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, March 
20, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be specified by its 
Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or 
until noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate, after consultation with 
the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the 
Senate to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest 
shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
# Úřední věstník C 296A/3. s

| | ISSN 1977-0863 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 296A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Ročník 653. srpna 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0863

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 296A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Ročník 653. srpna 2022

---

| Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Oznámení |
| | SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ |
| | Společný podnik Fusion for Energy |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Oznámení, kterým se mění oznámení společného evropského podniku pro ITER a rozvoj energie z jaderné syntézy (F4E) – Oznámení o volném pracovním místě na pozici ředitele (muž/žena) (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( Úř. věst. C 285 A, 26.7.2022 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Společný podnik Fusion for Energy

2022/C 296 A/01

Oznámení, kterým se mění oznámení společného evropského podniku pro ITER a rozvoj energie z jaderné syntézy (F4E) – Oznámení o volném pracovním místě na pozici ředitele (muž/žena) (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( Úř. věst. C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

( Úř. věst. C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

1

---

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

V Oznámení

SPRÁVNÍ ŘÍZENÍ

Společný podnik Fusion for Energy

| 3.8.2022 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 296/1

---

Oznámení, kterým se mění oznámení společného evropského podniku pro ITER a rozvoj energie z jaderné syntézy (F4E) – Oznámení o volném pracovním místě na pozici ředitele (muž/žena) (dočasný zaměstnanec – platová třída AD 14) – COM/2022/20086

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie C 285 A ze dne 26. července 2022
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

Strana 5, „Pracovní podmínky“, šestý odstavec:

| místo: | „Pracovní místo je volné od 1. ledna 2024.“ |
| --- | --- |

místo:

„Pracovní místo je volné od 1. ledna 2024.“

| má být: | „Pracovní místo je volné od 1. ledna 2023.“ |
| --- | --- |

má být:

má být

„Pracovní místo je volné od 1. ledna 2023.“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 9 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 9

   Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 1999

 Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Frist) introduced the 
 following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the 
                 Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for the reappointment of Dr. Hanna H. Gray as a citizen 
     regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,
That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the 
United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of 
the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of 
Congress, occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Dr. 
Hanna H. Gray of Illinois, is filled by reappointment of the incumbent 
for a term of 6 years, effective April 12, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3(e)

                             ARTICLES SUPPLEMENTARY
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 CRIIMI MAE INC.

                  CRIIMI MAE INC., a Maryland corporation having its principal
office in the City of Rockville, Montgomery County, Maryland (the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland that:

                  FIRST: Pursuant to authority contained in Article SIXTH of the
Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation, one hundred and fifty thousand
(150,000) authorized but unissued shares of the Corporation's Series A
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock have been duly reclassified by the Board
of Directors of the Corporation as authorized but unissued shares of the
Corporation's preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share (the "Preferred
Shares").

                  SECOND: A description of the Preferred Shares is contained in
the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation filed with the Maryland
Department of Assessments and Taxation on June 9, 1993.

                  THIRD: The reclassification of authorized but unissued shares
as set forth in these Articles Supplementary does not increase the authorized
capital of the Corporation or the aggregate par value thereof.


<PAGE>

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles
to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its Senior Vice President and its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by its Assistant Secretary
this ____ day of ________________, 1999. The undersigned Senior Vice president
acknowledges that these Articles Supplementary are the act of the Corporation,
that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief all matters and facts
set forth herein relating to the authorization and approval of these Articles
Supplementary are true in all material respects, and that this statement is made
under the penalties of perjury.

ATTEST:                             CRIIMI MAE INC.

________________________________    By:__________________________(SEAL)

Print Name:______________________   Print Name:__________________________

             Assistant Secretary                    Senior Vice President




[Affix corporate seal]







                                      -2-
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel
Group (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended  June 30, 2010 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





Dated:
          August 12, 2010
            /s/
      Jiangping JiangJiangping
      JiangChairwoman
      and Chief Executive Officer