alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 39 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 39

 Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Korean War and the service by 
  members of the Armed Forces during such war, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 3, 2000

Mr. Campbell introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Korean War and the service by 
  members of the Armed Forces during such war, and for other purposes.

Whereas on June 25, 1950, Communist North Korea invaded South Korea with 
        approximately 135,000 troops, thereby initiating the Korean War;
Whereas on June 27, 1950, President Harry S Truman ordered military intervention 
        in Korea;
Whereas approximately 5,720,000 members of the Armed Forces served during the 
        Korean War to defeat the spread of communism in Korea and throughout the 
        world;
Whereas casualties of the United States during the Korean War included 54,260 
        dead (of whom 33,665 were battle deaths), 92,134 wounded, and 8,176 
        listed as missing in action or prisoners of war; and
Whereas service by members of the Armed Forces in the Korean War should never be 
        forgotten: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 50th 
        anniversary of the Korean War;
            (2) expresses the gratitude of the people of the United 
        States to the members of the Armed Forces who served in the 
        Korean War;
            (3) honors the memory of service members who paid the 
        ultimate price for the cause of freedom, including those who 
        remain unaccounted for; and
            (4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation--
                    (A) recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Korean 
                War and the sacrifices of the members of the Armed 
                Forces who served and fought in Korea to defeat the 
                spread of communism; and
                    (B) calling upon the people of the United States to 
                observe such anniversary with appropriate ceremonies 
                and activities.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ex parte David WALLACE. (Re David Wallace and Wayne Walker v. State).

87-550.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 29, 1988.

Christopher Knight of Haas & Knight, Mobile, for petitioner.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BEATTY, Justice.

Writ Denied.

TORBERT, C.J., and ALMON, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.

MADDOX, JONES and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

STEAGALL, J., not sitting.

MADDOX, Justice

(dissenting).

I refer to my dissent filed in *Ex parte Walker,*530 So.2d 856 (Ala.1988), and reiterate my belief that certiorari should be granted in view of the Court’s recent decision in *Ex parte Branch,*526 So.2d 609 (Ala.1987).

JONES and ADAMS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SouthPeak Interactive Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Melanie Mroz, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Reba
McDermott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our best knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
17, 2010








/s/
      Melanie MrozMelanie
      MrozPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Reba McDermottReba
      McDermottChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
September 24, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of American Cordillera Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended February 28, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dwight Weigelt, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: April 21, 2014

|  

By:

/s/ Dwight Weigelt

 

 

Dwight Weigelt

 

 

CFO, Secretary, Treasurer, Director |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### James A. CAMPBELL, and Vitelia M. Campbell, a/k/a Vicki M. Campbell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT PLAN, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Control Data Business Center, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 82CA0872.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

Sept. 8, 1983.

*814Abelman & Abelman, Robert C. Abelman, Denver, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Bowman, Wright & Gower, Larry M. Snyder, Robert D. Gower, Denver, for defendant-appellee.

PIERCE, Judge.

In an action arising under the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, § 5-1-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973, (UCCC) plaintiffs, James and Yitelia Campbell (Campbells), appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered against them at the conclusion of a trial to the court. We affirm.

The Campbells agreed to serve as cosigners and encumbered their homes as collateral for a note executed by her brother. Thirteen months later, the brother became delinquent in his payments, and the Camp-bells attempted to cancel their obligation on the note exercising a right of rescission pursuant to § 5-5-204(1), C.R.S.1973 (1982 Cum.Supp.), which provides that such right exists for three days after the delivery- of disclosure documents.

Defendant refused to rescind, and the Campbells brought this action to compel rescission, to cancel of record the deeds of trust, and to quiet title to the property in them. They argue that they retained the right to rescind because disclosure documents had never been delivered.

At the close of the Campbells’ case, the court found that the necessary disclosure documents had been provided to the Camp-bells at the loan closing, and concluded that plaintiffs retained a right to rescind only until- the funds were disbursed three days after the closing. Therefore, it granted defendant’s “motion for directed verdict.”

Campbells contend that the trial court erred in “directing a verdict” because in so doing it resolved certain disputed facts against them. They further contend that the court erred in finding that the necessary disclosure documents were delivered to them at the closing. Their contentions lack merit.

When the court is the trier of fact, a motion denominated a “motion for directed verdict” is actually a motion to dismiss pursuant to C.R.C.P. 41(b), *see First National Bank v. Groussman,*29 Colo.App. 215, 483 P.2d 398 (1971). In ruling on such a motion the standard is not whether the plaintiff established a *prima facie*case, but whether judgment in favor of defendant is justified on the evidence presented. *Teodonno v. Bachman,*158 Colo. 1, 404 P.2d 284 (1965).

Here, it was undisputed that Camp-bells by their signatures acknowledged receipt of notice of their right to rescind. The UCCC provides that this written acknowledgment creates a rebuttáble presumption that Campbells received the disclosure documents. Section 5-5-204(3), C.R.S.1973. The evidence tending to rebut the presumption of delivery was inconsistent and controverted. Therefore, the trial court’s findings are binding on review. *Teodonno v. Bachmann, supra.*

Judgment affirmed.

BERMAN and METZGER, JJ., concur.
February 12, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Document Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: Request for Amendment to Exemption 14084 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the

FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket No.

FAA–2015–4584.

Dear Sir or Madam:

On December 29, 2015, the Federal Aviation Administration granted TAC Insight, LLC an

exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the

"Exemption") to allow TAC Insight, LLC to operate small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) under

controlled conditions for inspections and photography of construction jobsites, bulk material

production facilities and stockpiles, landfills, and debris volume assessments in disaster areas.

TAC Insight, LLC requests an amendment to add the SenseFly eBee and Trimble UX5aircraft to

exemption 14084 for commercial use under same terms and conditions contained in the

Exemption. Sent under separate cover is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM)

for the additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the

terms of the Exemption.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking only for the addition of two other types

of unmanned aerial vehicles, TAC Insight, LLC respectfully submits that good cause exists so that

notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an

amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely,

Mike Mendiola

TAC Insight, LLC

865-219-2980

mmendiola@tacinsight.com
#### Patrick K. COATES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GUNTHER, Judge.

We affirm the conviction for grand theft and the sentence imposed. The trial court did not err in finding that the property taken, a moped over 5 brake horsepower, is a motor vehicle as defined in section 322.-*75801(2), Florida Statutes (1985), and not a moped as defined in section 316.003(2), Florida Statutes (1985).

As a motor vehicle, the moped is presumed to have value pursuant to section 812.014(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1986), and the trial court was correct in so instructing the jury. No other instruction as to the value of the moped was necessary.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 Presstek,
Inc.
 Hudson,
New Hampshire
 
 
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 033-80466, 033-61215, 033-30337, 333-76905 and
333-97897) and Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-02299 and 33-48342) of Presstek, Inc., and in
the Prospectuses constituting part of such Registration Statements, of our
report dated March 16, 2006, except for the effects of the discontinued
operations as to which the date is April 24, 2007, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Presstek, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31,
2005 which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 
 /s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
 
 New York,
New York
 April 30,
2008
#### STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF MISSISSIPPI v. Lessie BODIE, Jack Bodie and Edwin Bodie.

No. 57748.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 29, 1988.

Mark S. Howard, Waynesboro, Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen. by Kenneth Crawford, Sr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellant.

Charles M. Leggett, Waynesboro, for ap-pellees.

Appeal from Special Court of Eminent Domain Court, Wayne County; Henry Palmer, Judge.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON and ZUCCARO, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Steve Bajic, President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Goldrange Resources, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Goldrange Resources, Inc. for the interim period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrange Resources, Inc.

Dated:  August 17, 2006

 

/s/ Steve Bajic                                                                

Steve Bajic

President, Secretary, Treasurer 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Goldrange Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Goldrange Resources, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JESSE MINOAKA KANESHIRO, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 22-10006 

D.C. No. 1:16-cr-00516-SOM-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Susan O. Mollway, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022**

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jesse Minoaka Kaneshiro appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Kaneshiro’s counsel has filed a brief 

stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-10006 

counsel of record. We have provided Kaneshiro the opportunity to file a pro se 

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been 

filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Main Street and Main
Incorporated (the "Company") for the year ended December 30, 2002, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on March 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael Garnreiter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


MAIN STREET AND MAIN INCORPORATED

/s/ Michael Garnreiter
------------------------------
Michael Garnreiter
Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2003

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Main  Street and Main  Incorporated  and will be  retained  by Main
Street and Main  Incorporated  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission and its staff upon request.
In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Oil and Gas, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne J. Babcock, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company./s/  Wayne J. Babcock

Wayne J. BabcockPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 19, 2002
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1993 IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                       <C>                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1994        DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1994        JAN-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1994        DEC-31-1993
<CASH>                                         0                  0
<SECURITIES>                                   0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                  0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0                  0
<PP&E>                                         0                  0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,500              6,224
<BONDS>                                        0                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                  0
<COMMON>                                 770,150             20,150
<OTHER-SE>                              (771,650)           (26,374)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0                  0
<SALES>                                        0                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0                  0
<CGS>                                          0                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         745,276              8,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (745,276)            (8,976)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (745,276)            (8,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                  0
<CHANGES>                                      0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                            (745,276)            (8,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.34)              (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.34)              (.01)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Thai One On,
Inc. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Evon Au, Chief Executive
Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date:  November 13, 2004       /s/ Evon Au
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer of
                              Thai One On, Inc., Registrant