alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Tanya J. McCloskey, Acting :

Consumer Advocate, :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, : No. 697 C.D. 2018

Respondent :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2019, upon consideration of 

the Petitioner’s Application to Report Unreported Opinion (Application), and 

the Answers of Respondent and Intervenors in opposition thereto, the 

Application is hereby GRANTED and it is ORDERED that the abovecaptioned opinion filed July 11, 2019, shall be designated OPINION rather 

than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

___________________________

ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION



### November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 2

- 01124

- CR

Style: Casey Demon Carmon

v. The State of Texas

Date motion filed * : September 6, 2013

Type of motion: Extension of time to file appellant’s brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: May 6, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 4 Current Due date: September 9 , 2013

Date Requested: September 30 , 2013

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If docume nt is to be filed, document due:

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant ’s motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief is denied. Appellant’s brief was originally

due May 6, 2013. Counsel has previously requested four extensions of time to file appellant’s brief.

Most recently, on August 20, 2013, counsel requested an extension of time because of deadlines faced

in unrelated cases. That motion was granted, with an admonition that no further extensions would be

granted. In the current motion, counsel again requests an extension of time because of recent deadlines

f aced in unrelated cases, however, all such deadlines have passed. Accordingly, counsel has not provided

a reasonable explanation why additional time is necessary, nor established extraordinary circumstances

for a further extension. If appellant’s brief is not filed by September 18, 2013, the case will be abated and

remanded to the trial court for a recommendation as to whether new counsel sh ould be appointed to

prepare and file a brief on appellant’s behalf.

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: September 12, 2013
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

 CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

 POLLUTION PREVENTION 

 

September 8, 2010 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Active ingredient inadvertently omitted from Zinc, Zinc Salts and Zeolites 

Registration Review documents. 

FROM: Eliza Blair, Chemical Review Manager 

Regulatory Management Branch II 

Antimicrobials Division (7510P) 

TO: Mark Hartman, Branch Chief 

Regulatory Management Branch II 

Antimicrobials Division (7510P) 

THRU: Lance Wormell, Team Leader 

Regulatory Management Branch II 

Antimicrobials Division (7510P) 

 This document serves as a notification that the active ingredient Zinc Sulfate, PC Code 

089001, was inadvertently omitted from the following documents for Registration Review Case 

# 4099 (Zinc, Zinc Salts and Zeolites). There is currently one antimicrobial product containing 

Zinc Sulfate (EPA Registration # 1258-1329). 

 In the Preliminary and Final Work Plans, EPA stated that data from Zinc Oxide could be 

bridged with the other active ingredients in the case. The addition of Zinc Sulfate to the case 

does not change EPA’s position and the listed data EPA intends to require and risk assessments 

EPA intends to conduct have not changed. The Zinc Sulfate active ingredient and product will be 

subject to the Registration Review process with the rest of the Zinc, Zinc Salts and Zeolites case, 

including the upcoming Data Call-In. 

 For questions about Zinc Sulfate’s antimicrobial uses, please contact Eliza Blair (703-

308-7279, blair.eliza@epa.gov).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Agency announces its Annual Grant Competition, which offers support for research, education and training, and the dissemination of information on international peace and conflict resolution. The Annual Grant Competition is open to any project that falls within the Institute's broad mandate of international conflict resolution.

*Deadline:*                         October 1, 2012.                              ( print page 18884)    

*Online application available: http://www.usip.org/​grants-fellowships/​annual-grant-competition.*

# DATES:

Submission of Application: October 1, 2012.

*Notification Date:*                         On or around March 31, 2013.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        United States Institute of Peace, 2301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20037, (202) 429-3842 (phone), (202) 833-1018 (fax), (202) 457-1719 (TTY), Email:                         *grants@usip.org*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Grant Program • Annual Grant Competition Phone (202) 429-3842, Email:                         *grants@usip.org*.                    

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Michael Graham, 

Senior Vice President for Management.

[FR Doc. 2012-7319 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
## Notice of Cancellation of Public Hearing

On July 8, 2011 the Illinois EPA had the Notice of Public Comment Period for State Implementation Plan Submittals for the Chicago and Metro

- East Ozone Nonattainment Areas and the Chicago PM 2 .5 Nonattainment Area published in the Chicago Sun Times and in the Illinois edition of the St. Louis Post Dispatch. Provision was also given in the notice for a public hearing to be held in this matter on August 18, 2011 conditioned on the receipt of a timel y request for Public Hearing.

Pursuant to the published notice, Illinois EP A is required to post either a Verification of the Public Hearing or a Cancellation of the Public Hearing on our website on August 12, 201l. Since no requests for public hearing h ave been received, the public hearing originally scheduled for August 18, 2011 has been cancelled. The public comment period has ended but the Illinois EP A will accept any public comments in this matter that have been postmarked on or before August 8, 201 1.

Dated: August 12, 2011

Dean Studer Hearing Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                           |                                                                                                                  
|-------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    November 15, 2006 | By: /s/Matthew L. Schissler                                                                                      
|                           | Matthew L. Schissler,                                                                                            
|                           | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of FirstFederal Financial Services
Corp.
Wooster, Ohio

         We have audited the consolidated statements of financial condition of
FirstFederal Financial Services Corp and Subsidiary (the "Corporation") as of
December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 1995. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.

         We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepting auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
consolidated financial statement presentation. we believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

         In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FirstFederal
Financial Services Corp and Subsidiary at December 31, 1995 in conformity with
generally accented accounting principles.

         As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in
1994, the Corporation changed its method of accounting for certain investments
in debt and equity securities to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 115.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

January 26, 1996
Columbus, Ohio
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 3- 27 60

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Alan Co le Ons ta d

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.

Mar y Ann W il ki ns on , Cle rk , Cir cu it Co ur t, Lee C ou nt y , Arka ns as ; Ri ch ard L. Pro ct or , Cir cu it Ju dg e, Lee Co un ty, Ark an sa s; Lee Co un ty A rk an sa s

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Eas te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s - Hel en a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: Octo be r 9, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Octo be r 22 , 20 13 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re MUR PHY, COLLOTO N, and GRUENDER, Circu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ __
PER CURI AM.Alan Ons ta d ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s pr es erv ic e di sm is sa l, wit h pr ejud ic e, 1
of hi s am en de d 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 co m pl a i n t , e ss en ti al ly as se rti ng th at he was

wro ng fu ll y de ni ed in fo rm a pa up eri s (IFP ) st at us in st at e co ur t, whi ch pr ev en te d hi m fro m br in gi ng a co nd it io ns -o f-co nf in em en t cas e in st at e co ur t. Upo n care fu l de no vo

rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at th e di sm is sa l was pr op er. Se e 28 U.S.C. § 19 15 A (in ci vi l
act io n in w h i c h pr is on er se ek s red res s fro m go ve rn m en ta l en ti ty or of fic er or

em pl oyee of go ve rn m en ta l en ti ty, co ur t sh al l rev ie w co m pl ai nt as so on as pr act ic ab le

an d di sm is s it if it is fri vo lo us , m al ic io us , fai ls to st at e cl ai m , or se ek s m on et ary rel ie f fro m de fen da nt who is im m un e); se e al

so Co op er v. Sc hr ir o , 18 9 F.3 d 78 1, 78 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 ) (p er cu ria m ) (d e no vo rev ie w of § 19 15 A di sm is sa l). Sp eci fic al ly, we ag ree wit h th e di st ric t co ur t th at Ons ta d’s co m pl ai nt fai le d to st at e a cl ai m up on whi ch rel ie f co ul d be gr an te d. Se e W il li ams v. McKen zi e , 83 4 F.2 d 15 2, 15 3- 54 (8 th Ci r. 19 87 ) (s ta ti ng ge ne ral ru le th at IFP li ti ga nt ’s acce ss to co ur t is m at te r of
pr iv il eg e, no t o f ri gh t); cf . Mur ra y v. Dos al , 1 50 F.3 d 81 4, 81 7 (8 th Cir . 19 98 ) (p er

cu ria m ) (n ot in g th at Su pr em e Co ur t ha s ne ve r reco gn iz ed un li m it ed ru le th at in di ge nt pl a i n t i f f s at al l ti m es an d in al l cas es ha ve rig ht to rel ie f wit ho ut pa y m en t of fees ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm

. Se e 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B. W e al so de ny Ons ta d’s m ot io n fo r ap po in tm en t o f co un se l.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le D.P. Mar sh al l Jr ., Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e East ern 1 Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s.

-2

-
----

Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each ofthe undersigned officers of SE Global Equities Corp., a Minnesota corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify, [to such officer's knowledge],that:

The Form 10-QSB for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005****(the"Form *10-QSB*")of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form *10-QSB*fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Dated: September 15, 2005/s/      Derek Bartlett
 
      Derek Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer
 
 
Dated: September 15, 2005/s/      John Arnold
 
John Arnold, Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Brunner
Companies Income Properties III 1995 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000847319
<NAME> BRUNNER COMPANIES INCOME PROPERTIES III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         669,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      14,426,499
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,739,865
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,816,016
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     12,096,589
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     619,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,816,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,147,266
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,815,103
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,542,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   176,450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,458,517
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                  1,008,834
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         375,657
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     2,765,984
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,608,992
<COMMON>                                        73,119
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      923,650
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            953,785
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,347,865<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,500
<PREFERRED>                                    267,682<F2>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,633,077
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 342,804
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  469,248
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     16,863
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   685
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,526,953
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                5,608,992
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,341,201
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           110,722<F3>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,022,359
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,022,359
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        318,842
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             152,003
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 470,845
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       158,707<F4>
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,416
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,569
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  199,847
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       115,733
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       79,454
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         337,868
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.62
<FN>
<F1>Includes $(602,689) of Treasury Stock at cost
<F2>Includes $14,404 of Preference Stock
<F3>Non-Operating Expense
<F4>Includes $16,632 of Preferred and Preference Stock Dividends
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence W. ARABIE, Jr.

No. 87-KH-0788.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Arabie, Lawrence W. Jr.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 84-982; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-KH-219.

Denied.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 42

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Order of the Purple Heart for Military Merit,

commonly known as the Purple Heart, is the oldest military decoration in the world in present use;

Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the

President of the United States to members of the Armed

Forces who are wounded in conflict with an enemy force

or while held by an enemy force as a prisoner of war, and

posthumously to the next of kin of members of the

Armed Forces who are killed in conflict with an enemy

force or who die of a wound received in conflict with an

enemy force;

Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7,

1782, during the Revolutionary War, when General

George Washington issued an order establishing the Honorary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the

Badge of Military Merit or the Decoration of the Purple

Heart;

Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end

of the War of the Revolution, but was revived out of respect for the memory and military achievements of

George Washington in 1932, the year marking the 200th

anniversary of his birth; and
2

SCON 42 ES

Whereas 1999 is the year marking the 200th anniversary of

the death of George Washington: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 the members of the Armed Forces who have been

6 awarded the Purple Heart; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

9 such a stamp be issued in 1999, the year marking

10 the 200th anniversary of the death of George Wash11 ington.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 42

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by

the United States Postal Service honoring themembers of the Armed Forces who have beenawarded the Purple Heart.