17410 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 

1See Bottom Mount Combination RefrigeratorFreezers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 

Negative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Alignment of Final Determination With Final 

Antidumping Determination, 76 FR 55044 

(September 6, 2011) (Preliminary Determination). 

2See Memorandum from the Team to Gary 

Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

Re: Scope Modification Requests, dated October 26, 

2011 (Preliminary Scope Memorandum). 

because it requires additional time to 

evaluate the surrogate value 

submissions and arguments made by the 

interested parties following the 

Preliminary Results. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, the Department is extending the 

time limit for completing the final 

results of the administrative review 

from 120 days to 180 days. The final 

results are now due no later than June 

4, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7218 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–801] 

Solid Urea From the Russian 

Federation: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dustin Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0747 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At the request of interested parties, 

the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on solid urea from the Russian 

Federation for the period July 1, 2010, 

through June 30, 2011. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results within 245 days 

after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. If it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary results to 

a maximum of 365 days after the last 

day of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

April 1, 2012, because we require 

additional time to analyze a detailed 

response to a supplemental 

questionnaire that was submitted on 

March 7, 2012. In addition, the 

numerous extensions we have granted 

for filing various responses has 

contributed to us requiring additional 

time to complete the preliminary 

results. 

Therefore, we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 75 days, until 

June 15, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7236 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–866] 

Bottom Mount Combination 

Refrigerator-Freezers From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

bottom mount combination refrigeratorfreezers (bottom mount refrigerators) 

from the Republic of Korea (Korea). For 

information on the estimated subsidy 

rates, see the ‘‘Suspension of 

Liquidation’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Myrna L. Lobo, Justin M. Neuman, or 

Milton Koch, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 6, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2371, (202) 482–0486, and (202) 

482–2584, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The U.S. producer that filed the 

petition for this investigation is 

Whirlpool Corporation (hereafter, 

Whirlpool, or ‘‘petitioner’’). This 

investigation covers 41 programs. The 

mandatory respondents in this 

investigation are: (1) Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), and its 

cross-owned affiliates Samsung 

Gwangju Electronics Co., Ltd. (SGEC) 

and Samsung Electronics Logitech 

(SEL); (2) LG Electronics (LGE) and its 

cross-owned affiliate, ServeOne Co., 

Ltd., and (3) Daewoo Electronics 

Corporation (DWE). 

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation for which 

we are measuring subsidies is January 1, 

2010, through December 31, 2010. 

Case History 

The following events have occurred 

since the Department published the 

Preliminary Determination.1 From 

September through December 2011, the 

Department issued numerous 

supplemental questionnaires to all 

parties concerning the New Subsidies 

Allegations (NSA), cross ownership, and 

other program issues. All parties timely 

responded to the Department’s 

supplemental questionnaires. 

In September and October 2011, the 

petitioner filed comments on the 

supplemental responses of LGE and 

SEC, on the NSA questionnaire 

responses, and on cross-ownership of 

respondents. On October 17, 2011, the 

Government of Korea (GOK) submitted 

to the record the public version of a 

verification report from a prior 

investigation. Also in October, SEC filed 

pre-verification corrections. On October 

27, 2011, the Department placed 

independent research on the record. On 

October 31, 2011, the Department 

placed on the record the Preliminary 

Scope Memorandum,2 prepared in the 

companion antidumping duty (AD) 

investigation. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 17411 

3See Memorandum to the File from Justin 

Neuman, Meeting with Whirlpool Corporation 

Regarding the Countervailing Duty Investigation of 

Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers 

from the Republic of Korea, dated November 28, 

2011. 

4 See Memorandum to the File from Gary 

Taverman, Ex Parte Meeting with Counsel for 

Samsung Electronics, Ltd., dated February 7, 2012. 

5See Memorandum to the File, Ex Parte Meeting 

with Counsel for Daewoo Electronics Corporation 

Regarding the Countervailing Duty Investigation of 

Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers 

from the Republic of Korea, dated March 7, 2012. 

6Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final 

Determination, and Negative Critical Circumstances 

Determination: Bottom Mount Combination 

Refrigerator-Freezers From the Republic of Korea, 

76 FR 67675 (November 2, 2011) (AD Preliminary 

Determination). 

7The existence of an interior sub-compartment 

for ice-making in an upper-most storage 

compartment does not render an upper-most storage 

compartment a freezer compartment. 

In November 2011, the petitioner filed 

new information and comments on the 

NSA supplemental responses of the 

GOK and DWE, and on suppliers and 

verification issues for LGE and SEC. On 

November 28, 2011, the petitioner met 

with the Department and filed preverification comments.3 On that date, 

the Department also issued verification 

outlines to the GOK, LGE, SEC, and 

DWE. 

The Department conducted 

verification from December 5, 2011, 

through December 16, 2011. On 

December 21, 2011, the Department 

issued its Post-Preliminary Analysis of 

Cross-ownership and its PostPreliminary Analysis of New Subsidy 

Allegations. On that date, the 

Department also issued its PostPreliminary Analysis Regarding the 

Restructuring of Daewoo Electronics 

Corporation. 

On February 2, 2012, the Department 

issued verification reports for LGE and 

SEC. On February 3, 2012, the 

Department issued verification reports 

for the GOK and DWE. Also on February 

3, 2012, the Department met with 

counsel for SEC.4 On February 14, 2012, 

the GOK, LGE, SEC, and DWE filed case 

briefs. On February 21, 2012, the 

Department issued its Post-Preliminary 

Analysis: GOK Preferential Lending 

Under the Daewoo Workout, and the 

GOK, LGE, SEC, and the petitioner filed 

rebuttal briefs. On February 24, 2012, 

the GOK and DWE filed case briefs on 

GOK Preferential Lending Under the 

Daewoo Workout. On February 27, 

2012, the petitioner filed a rebuttal brief 

on GOK Preferential Lending Under the 

Daewoo Workout. On February 28, 

2012, the Department held a public 

hearing, based on the timely requests of 

the petitioner, SEC, LGE, and DWE, 

filed in September and October 2011. 

On March 5, 2012, the Department met 

with the GOK and counsel for DWE.5

Scope Comments 

In the Preliminary Determination, the 

Department stated that it was evaluating 

comments filed by the parties regarding 

the scope in the companion AD 

investigation. In AD Preliminary 

Determination,6 we did not modify the 

description of the scope of the 

investigations in the manner requested 

by certain interested parties. 

Specifically, we did not modify the 

scope to be consistent with the 

Association of Home Appliance 

Manufacturers definition, nor did we 

exclude kimchi refrigerators or Quatro 

Cooling Refrigerators from the scope. 

We did, however, clarify the scope to 

eliminate any ambiguity with respect to 

the inclusion of Quatro Cooling 

Refrigerators in the scope of the 

investigation. See AD Preliminary 

Determination, 76 FR at 67690–67691; 

see also Preliminary Scope 

Memorandum. No party commented on 

our preliminary scope determination. 

Therefore, we have made no further 

changes to the description of the scope 

of the investigation. 

Scope of the Investigation 

The products covered by the 

investigation are all bottom mount 

combination refrigerator-freezers and 

certain assemblies thereof from Korea. 

For purposes of the investigation, the 

term ‘‘bottom mount combination 

refrigerator-freezers’’ denotes 

freestanding or built-in cabinets that 

have an integral source of refrigeration 

using compression technology, with all 

of the following characteristics: 

• The cabinet contains at least two 

interior storage compartments accessible 

through one or more separate external 

doors or drawers or a combination 

thereof; 

• An upper-most interior storage 

compartment(s) that is accessible 

through an external door or drawer is 

either a refrigerator compartment or 

convertible compartment, but is not a 

freezer compartment; 7 and 

• There is at least one freezer or 

convertible compartment that is 

mounted below an upper-most interior 

storage compartment(s). 

For purposes of the investigation, a 

refrigerator compartment is capable of 

storing food at temperatures above 32 

degrees F (0 degrees C), a freezer 

compartment is capable of storing food 

at temperatures at or below 32 degrees 

F (0 degrees C), and a convertible 

compartment is capable of operating as 

either a refrigerator compartment or a 

freezer compartment, as defined above. 

Also covered are certain assemblies 

used in bottom mount combination 

refrigerator-freezers, namely: (1) Any 

assembled cabinets designed for use in 

bottom mount combination refrigeratorfreezers that incorporate, at a minimum: 

(a) An external metal shell, (b) a back 

panel, (c) a deck, (d) an interior plastic 

liner, (e) wiring, and (f) insulation; (2) 

any assembled external doors designed 

for use in bottom mount combination 

refrigerator-freezers that incorporate, at 

a minimum: (a) An external metal shell, 

(b) an interior plastic liner, and (c) 

insulation; and (3) any assembled 

external drawers designed for use in 

bottom mount combination refrigeratorfreezers that incorporate, at a minimum: 

(a) An external metal shell, (b) an 

interior plastic liner, and (c) insulation. 

The products subject to the 

investigation are currently classifiable 

under subheadings 8418.10.0010, 

8418.10.0020, 8418.10.0030, and 

8418.10.0040 of the Harmonized Tariff 

System of the United States (HTSUS). 

Products subject to this investigation 

may also enter under HTSUS 

subheadings 8418.21.0010, 

8418.21.0020, 8418.21.0030, 

8418.21.0090, and 8418.99.4000, 

8418.99.8050, and 8418.99.8060. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to this scope is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Subsidy Programs and 

Comments Received 

The subsidy programs under 

investigation and the issues raised in 

the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in 

this investigation are discussed in 

Memorandum to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final 

Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation of Bottom Mount 

Combination Refrigerator-Freezers from 

the Republic of Korea (Decision 

Memorandum), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. A list of the 

subsidy programs and the issues that 

parties raised and to which we 

responded in the Decision 

Memorandum is attached to this notice 

as an Appendix. The Decision 

Memorandum is a public document, 

which is on file electronically via 

Import Administration’s Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (IA ACCESS). 

Access to IA ACCESS is available in the 

Central Records Unit (CRU), room 7046 

of the main Department of Commerce 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17412 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 

8See Bottom Mount Combination RefrigeratorFreezers From Korea and Mexico, 76 FR 29791 (May 

23, 2011); and USITC Publication 4232 entitled 

Bottom Mount Combination Refrigerator-Freezers 

From Korea and Mexico: Investigation Nos. 701– 

TA–477 and 731–TA–1180–1181 (Preliminary) 

(May 2011). 

9See Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Calculation of 

the All Other Rate in the Countervailing Duty 

Investigation of Bottom Mount Combination 

Refrigerator-Freezers from the Republic Of Korea,’’ 

dated concurrently with this notice. 

10See, e.g., Certain Seamless Carbon and Alloy 

Steel Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination, Final 

Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, 

75 FR 57444 (September 21, 2010). 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Decision Memorandum is 

also accessible on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The signed Decision 

Memorandum and the electronic 

versions of the Decision Memorandum 

are identical in content. 

Use of Facts Otherwise Available, 

Including Adverse Inferences 

For purposes of this final 

determination, we relied, in part, on 

adverse facts available (AFA), as 

provided for in sections 776(a) and (b) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(Act), to determine the countervailable 

subsidy rate for one program under 

investigation. A full discussion of our 

decision to apply AFA is presented in 

the Decision Memorandum in the 

section ‘‘Application of Facts Available, 

Including the Application of Adverse 

Inferences.’’ 

Injury Test 

Because Korea is a ‘‘Subsidies 

Agreement Country’’ within the 

meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) is 

required to determine pursuant to 

section 701(a)(2) of the Act whether 

imports of the subject merchandise from 

Korea materially injure, or threaten 

material injury to, a U.S. industry. On 

May 23, 2011, the ITC published its 

affirmative preliminary determination 

that there is a reasonable indication that 

an industry in the United States is 

materially injured by reason of allegedly 

subsidized imports from Korea of 

subject merchandise.8

Suspension of Liquidation 

In accordance with section 

705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we have 

calculated an individual countervailable 

subsidy rate for each respondent. 

Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states 

that for companies not individually 

investigated, we will determine an ‘‘all 

others’’ rate equal to the weighted 

average of the countervailable subsidy 

rates established for exporters and 

producers individually investigated, 

excluding any zero and de minimis 

countervailable subsidy rates, and any 

rates based entirely on AFA under 

section 776 of the Act. 

Notwithstanding the language of 

section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we 

have not calculated the ‘‘all others’’ rate 

by weight averaging the rates of DWE 

and SEC, because doing so risks 

disclosure of proprietary information. 

Therefore, we have calculated an 

average rate using other information on 

the record.9 Since both DWE and SEC 

received countervailable export 

subsidies and the ‘‘all others’’ rate is an 

average based on the individually 

investigated exporters and producers, 

the ‘‘all others’’ rate includes export 

subsidies.10

Company 

Ad valorem net 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Daewoo Electronics Corporation ..................................................................................................................................................... 12.90 

LG Electronics Inc ........................................................................................................................................................................... 0.30 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd./Samsung Gwangju Electronics Co., Ltd ........................................................................................ 2.46 

All Others ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2.79 

Because the Preliminary 

Determination was negative, we did not 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to suspend entries of 

subject merchandise. In accordance 

with sections 705(c)(1)(B)(ii) and (C) of 

the Act, as applicable, we are directing 

CBP to suspend liquidation of and to 

require the posting of a cash deposit or 

bond on all imports of the subject 

merchandise from Korea, other than 

those produced and exported by LGE 

because LGE’s rate is de minimis, that 

are entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. The suspension of 

liquidation will remain in effect until 

further notice. 

If the ITC issues a final affirmative 

injury determination, we will issue a 

CVD order. If the ITC determines that 

material injury, or threat of material 

injury, does not exist, this proceeding 

will be terminated and all estimated 

duties deposited or securities posted as 

a result of the suspension of liquidation 

will be refunded or canceled. 

ITC Notification 

In accordance with section 705(d) of 

the Act, we will notify the ITC of our 

determination. In addition, we are 

making available to the ITC all nonprivileged and non-proprietary 

information relating to this 

investigation. We will allow the ITC 

access to all privileged and business 

proprietary information in our files, 

provided the ITC confirms that it will 

not disclose such information, either 

publicly or under an administrative 

protective order, without the written 

consent of the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration. In accordance 

with section 705(b)(3) of the Act, 

because our preliminary determination 

was negative and our final 

determination is affirmative, the ITC 

will make its final determination within 

75 days after the Department makes its 

final determination. 

Return or Destruction of Proprietary 

Information 

In the event that the ITC issues a 

negative final injury determination, this 

notice will serve as the only reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

This determination is issued and 

published pursuant to sections 705(d) 

and 777(i) of the Act. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 17413 

Dated: March 16, 2012. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Subsidy Valuation Information 

A. Period of Investigation 

B. Cross-Ownership and Attribution of 

Subsidies 

C. Allocation Period 

D. Discount Rates and Interest Rate 

Benchmarks For Loans 

E. Equityworthiness of DWJ and DWE 

III. Application of Facts Available, Including 

the Application of Adverse Inferences 

IV. Analysis of Programs 

A. Programs Determined To Be 

Countervailable 

1. Restructuring of Daewoo Electronics 

Corporation 

a. GOK Equity Infusions under the Daewoo 

Workout 

b. GOK Preferential Lending under the 

Daewoo Workout 

2. KDB and IBK Short-Term Discounted 

Loans for Export Receivables 

3. K–SURE Short-term Export Insurance 

4. Tax Programs 

a. Tax Reduction for Research and 

Manpower Development: RSTA 10(1)(3) 

b. RSTA Article 25(2) Tax Deductions for 

Investments in Energy Economizing 

Facilities 

c. RSTA Article 26 Tax Deduction for 

Facilities Investment 

d. Gwangju Metropolitan City Production 

Facilities Subsidies: Tax Reductions/Tax 

Exemptions 

e. Gyeongsangnam Province Production 

Facilities Subsidies: Tax Reductions/Tax 

Exemptions 

5. Grant Programs 

a. GOK Subsidies for ‘‘Green Technology 

R&D’’ and its Commercialization 

b. GOK 21st Century Frontier R&D 

Program/Information Display R&D 

Center Program 

c. R&D Grants Discovered at Verification 

B. Program Determined To Be Not 

Countervailable 

Gyeongsangnam Province and KEMCO 

Energy Savings Subsidies/ESF Program 

C. Programs Determined To Be Not Used 

1. KEXIM Programs 

A. KEXIM Short-Term Export Credit 

B. KEXIM Export Loan Guarantees 

C. KEXIM Trade Bill Rediscounting 

Program 

D. KEXIM Export Factoring 

2. K–SURE—Export Credit Guarantees 

3. Gwangju Metropolitan City Programs 

A. Relocation Grants 

B. Facilities Grants 

C. Employment Grants 

D. Training Grants 

E. Consulting Grants 

F. Preferential Financing for Business 

Restructuring 

G. Interest Grants for the Stabilization of 

Management Costs 

H. ‘‘Special Support’’ for Large Corporate 

Investors 

I. Research and Development and Other 

Technical Support Services 

4. Changwon City Subsidy Programs 

A. Relocation Grants 

B. Employment Grants 

C. Training Grants 

D. Facilities Grants 

E. Grant for ‘‘Moving Metropolitan AreaBase Company to Changwon’’ 

F. Preferential Financing for Land Purchase 

G. Financing for the Stabilization of 

Business Activities 

H. Special Support for Large Companies 

5. Other GOK Programs 

A. Research, Supply, or Workforce 

Development Investment Tax Deductions 

for ‘‘New Growth Engines’’ Under RSTA 

Art. 10(1)(1) 

B. Research, Supply, or Workforce 

Development Expense Tax Deductions 

for ‘‘Core Technologies’’ Under RSTA 

Art. 10(1)(2) 

C. Targeted Facilities Subsidies through 

Korea Finance Corporation (KoFC), KDB, 

and IBK ‘‘New Growth Engines Industry 

Fund’’ 

D. GOK Green Fund Subsidies 

E. IBK Preferential Loans to Green 

Enterprises 

F. Gwangju ‘‘Photonics Industry Promotion 

Project’’ (PIPP) Product Development 

Support 

V. Analysis of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether RSTA Article 25(2) is 

De Facto Specific 

Comment 2: Whether RSTA Article 25(2) 

relates to Subject Merchandise 

Comment 3: Whether RSTA Article 26 

Benefits are Specific 

Comment 4: Whether RSTA Article 

10(1)(3) is De Facto Specific 

Comment 5: Whether the Gwangju 

Metropolitan City and Gyeongsangnam 

Province Production Facilities Tax 

Reductions/Tax Exemptions are Specific 

Comment 6: Whether KDB/IBK Short-Term 

Discounted Loans for Export Receivables 

are Specific 

Comment 7: Whether SEC Received KDB/ 

IBK Short-Term Discounted Loans for 

Export Receivables 

Comment 8: Whether D/A and O/A 

Financing Were Provided in Accordance 

With Market Interest Rates 

Comment 9: Whether K–SURE Charged 

Adequate Premiums in a Way that 

Covers Its Long-Term Costs and Losses 

Comment 10: Whether the Department 

Should Apply AFA to Calculate a Benefit 

to SEC from the K–SURE Export 

Insurance Program 

Comment 11: Whether SEC’s K–SURE 

Payouts Relate to Subject Merchandise 

Comment 12: Whether K–SURE Benefits 

Granted to SEC’s U.S. Affiliate Are 

Countervailable 

Comment 13: Whether the Green 

Technology R&D Program is 

Countervailable 

Comment 14: Whether Green Technology 

R&D Grants are tied to Non-Subject 

Merchandise 

Comment 15: Whether AFA Should be 

Applied to Grants Received by LGE from 

the 21st Century Frontier R&D Program 

Comment 16: Whether the Department 

Should Revise the Denominator Used to 

Calculate the Subsidy Rate for LGE’s Use 

of the ‘‘Green Technology R&D’’ Program 

Comment 17: Whether Grants Received by 

SGEC for Refrigerator Compressor R&D 

are Countervailable 

Comment 18: Whether the Department 

Should Apply AFA to Grants Received 

by SGEC for Refrigerator Compressor 

R&D 

Comment 19: Whether the Department 

Should Revise Sales Denominators to 

Reflect Changes from Verification 

Comment 20: Whether there is Cross 

Ownership Among All of the Companies 

in the Samsung Group 

Comment 21: Whether the Attribution 

Rules Were Correctly Applied to the 

Calculation of Benefits to SGEC, SEL and 

SEC 

Comment 22: Whether the Department 

Should Attribute Any Subsidies 

Received by ServeOne to LGE 

Comment 23: Whether the Department 

Should Continue to Find that SEC did 

not Use Other Programs 

Comment 24: Whether Government 

Ownership Alone Transforms a 

Financial Institution Into a Government 

Authority 

Comment 25: Whether the Department 

Properly Analyzed DWJ’s Restructuring 

and Debt Adjustment under CRPA 

Comment 26: Whether Private Investor 

Participation on DWJ/DWE’s Creditors’ 

Council Provides a Benchmark 

Comment 27: Whether the Department’s 

Analysis of the 2001 and 2002 Debt 

Restructuring Was Correct 

Comment 28: Equityworthiness of DWJ/ 

DWE at the Time of the 2001 and 2002 

Debt-to- Equity Conversions 

Comment 29: Whether the GOK and FSS 

Used KAMCO to Gain Control of DWJ/ 

DWE’s Creditors’ Council 

Comment 30: Whether the Department 

Should Establish a Zero Cash Deposit 

Rate for DWE 

Comment 31: Whether the GOK-owned 

Creditors Held a Supermajority in DWE’s 

29th Creditors’ Council Meeting 

Comment 32: Whether the Reclassification 

of the KAMCO–Held Debentures to 

Long- Term Loans Results in a 

Countervailable Benefit 

Comment 33: Whether Private Creditors 

Restructured Their Loans on the Same 

Basis and on the Same Terms 

[FR Doc. 2012–7217 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–865] 

Notice of Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value and Negative 

Critical Circumstances Determination: 

Bottom Mount Combination 

Refrigerator-Freezers From the 

Republic of Korea 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES