UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC  20549



Form 10-KSB

(Mark One)

[X]

ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007



[ ]

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



For the transition period from _________to _________



Commission file number 0-18541



NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)



|                                |                     
|------------------------------- | --------------------
|California                      | 95-3906167          
|(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    
|incorporation or organization)  | (Identification No.)



55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina 29602

(Address of principal executive offices)



Issuer's telephone number    (864) 239-1000



Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:



None



Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:



Limited Partnership Units

(Title of class)



Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. [ ]



Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesX No___



Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the Partnership's knowledge in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.  [X]



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]  No[X]



State issuer's revenues for its most recent fiscal year.  $7,000



State the aggregate market value of the voting partnership interests held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as of December 31, 2007.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of the Registrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can be determined.



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

NONE



Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [ ]; No [X]



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS



The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements in certain circumstances. Certain information included in this Report contains or may contain information that is forward-looking, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Partnerships future financial performance and the effect of government regulations. Actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and, in addition, will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the Partnerships control including, without limitation: national and local economic conditions; the general level of interest rates; the terms of governmental regulations that affect the Partnership and its investment in limited partnerships and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment in which the Partnership operates; financing risks, including the risk that the Partnerships cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest; real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets; litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by the limited partnerships in which the Partnership has invested.   Readers should carefully review the Partnerships financial statements and the notes thereto and the other documents the Partnership files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



PART I



ITEM 1.

Description of Business



National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. ("NTCP" or the "Partnership") is a limited partnership formed under the laws of the State of California on March 7, 1989.  The Partnership was formed to invest primarily in other limited partnerships (the "Local Partnerships") which own or lease and operate multifamily housing complexes that are eligible for low-income housing tax credits, or in certain cases, historic rehabilitation tax credits (Tax Credits).  The general partner of the Partnership (the General Partner) is National Partnership Investments Corp. (NAPICO), a California corporation.  The business of the Partnership is conducted primarily by NAPICO. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCO), a publicly traded real estate investment trust.



The Partnership originally registered 14,000 units, consisting of 28,000 Limited Partnership Interests ("LPI"), and warrants to purchase a maximum of 14,000 Additional Limited Partnership Interests ("ALPI").  The term of the offering expired in June 1990, at which date the Partnership raised $59,749,000 from the sale of 16,336 LPI and warrants representing 7,563 ALPI. The Partnership shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2029, unless terminated prior to that, pursuant to the partnership agreement or law.



In general, an owner of a low-income housing apartment complex ("Apartment Complex") is entitled to receive Housing Tax Credits in each year of a ten-year period (the "Credit Period").  The Apartment Complex is subject to a 15-year compliance period (the "Compliance Period") to preserve the Housing Tax Credits.  In addition to the Housing Tax Credits, tax credits are available for certain rehabilitation expenditures incurred in improving certified historic structures ("Historic Tax Credits", and together with Housing Tax Credits are referred to as "Tax Credits").  Tax Credits are available to the Limited Partners to reduce their Federal income tax liability.  The ability of a Limited Partner to utilize Tax Credits or allocated losses may be restricted by the passive activity loss limitation and the general business tax credit limitation rules.  NTCP invests in Local Partnerships that each own an Apartment Complex that is eligible for (i) Housing Tax Credits or (ii) in certain cases, Historic Tax Credits and, in some cases, both.  Several of the Local Partnerships also benefit from government programs promoting low or moderate income housing.











The Partnership's investments in Local Partnerships are subject to the risks incident to the management and ownership of multifamily residential real estate.  Neither the Partnership's investments nor the Apartment Complexes owned by the Local Partnerships will be readily marketable, and there can be no assurance that the Partnership will be able to dispose of its Local Partnership Interests, or that the Local Partnerships will be able to dispose of their Apartment Complexes, at the end of the Compliance Period.  The value of the Partnership's investments will be subject to changes in national and local economic conditions, including substantial unemployment, which could adversely impact vacancy levels, rental payment defaults and operating expenses.  This, in turn, could substantially increase the risk of operating losses for the Apartment Complexes and the Partnership.  The Apartment Complexes will be subject to loss through foreclosure.  In addition, each Local Partnership is subject to risks relating to environmental hazards which might be uninsurable.  Because the Partnership's ability to control its operations will depend on these and other factors beyond the control of the General Partner and the local general partners, there can be no assurance that the Partnership's operations will be profitable or that the anticipated Tax Credits will be available to Limited Partners.



The Partnership does not have any employees. Services are performed for the Partnership by the General Partner and agents retained by the General Partner.



The Apartment Complexes owned by the Local Partnerships in which NTCP has invested were developed by the local operating general partners (the Local Operating General Partners) who acquired the sites and applied for applicable mortgages and subsidies, if any.  NTCP became the principal limited partner in these Local Partnerships pursuant to arm's-length negotiations with the Local Operating General Partners.  As a limited partner, NTCP's liability for obligations of the Local Partnership is generally limited to its investment.  The Local Operating General Partner of the Local Partnership retains responsibility for developing, constructing, maintaining, operating and managing the Apartment Complex.  Under certain circumstances, an affiliate of NAPICO or NTCP may act as the Local Operating General Partner.  An affiliate, National Tax Credit Inc. ("NTC") or another affiliate, is acting as a non-managing, administrative general partner or special limited partner of each Local Partnership.



In order to stimulate private investment in low income housing, the Federal government and certain state and local agencies have provided significant ownership incentives, including among others, interest subsidies, rent supplements, and mortgage insurance, with the intent of reducing certain market risks and providing investors with certain tax benefits, plus limited cash distributions and the possibility of long-term capital gains.  There remain, however, significant risks.  The long-term nature of investments in government assisted housing limits the ability of NTCP to vary its portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions; such investments are also subject to changes in local economic circumstances and housing patterns, as well as rising operating costs, vacancies, rent collection difficulties, energy shortages and other factors which have an impact on real estate values.  These projects also require greater management expertise and may have higher operating expenses than conventional housing projects.



Laws benefiting disabled persons may result in the Local Partnerships' incurrence of unanticipated expenses.  Under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or ADA, all places intended to be used by the public are required to meet certain Federal requirements related to access and use by disabled persons. Likewise, the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, or FHAA, requires apartment properties first occupied after March 13, 1990 to be accessible to the handicapped.  These and other Federal, state and local laws may require modifications to the Local Partnerships properties, or restrict renovations of the properties.  Noncompliance with these laws could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants and also could result in an order to correct any non-complying feature, which could result in substantial capital expenditures. Although the General Partner believes that the Local Partnerships properties are substantially in compliance with present requirements, the Local
Partnerships may incur unanticipated expenses to comply with the ADA and the FHAA.



The following is a schedule of the occupancy status as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, of the Apartment Complexes owned by Local Partnerships in which NTCP is a limited partner.



SCHEDULE OF PROJECTS OWNED BY LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS

IN WHICH NTCP HAS AN INVESTMENT

DECEMBER 31, 2007



|                      |        |                  |               |              
|--------------------- | ------ | ---------------- | ------------- | -------------
|                      |        | Units            |               |              
|                      |        | Authorized For   | Percentage of | Percentage of
|                      |        | Rental           | Total Units   | Total Units  
|                      | No. of | Assistance Under | Occupied      | Occupied     
|Name and Location     | Units  | Section 8 (A)    | 2007          | 2006         
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Apple Tree            |        |                  |               |              
|Brigham City, UT      | 24     | --               | 95%           | 98%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Glenark               |        |                  |               |              
|Woonsocket, RI        | 67     | --               | 96%           | 96%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Grand Meadows         |        |                  |               |              
|Grand Blanc, MI       | 64     | --               | 92%           | 98%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Grinnell Park         |        |                  |               |              
|Grinnell, IA          | 24     | 24               | 83%           | 96%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Kimberly Court        |        |                  |               |              
|Seward, AK            | 24     | --               | 83%           | 97%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|North Liberty         |        |                  |               |              
|North Liberty, IA     | 24     | 24               | 94%           | 93%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Rolling Hills         |        |                  |               |              
|Santoga, PA           | 232    | 232              | 99%           | 99%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Summit I  Wallace    |        |                  |               |              
|Philadelphia, PA      | 17     | --               | 100%          | 93%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Summit II  Bergdoll  |        |                  |               |              
|Philadelphia, PA      | 9      | --               | 89%           | 94%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Summit III  Chandler |        |                  |               |              
|Philadelphia, PA      | 25     | --               | 99%           | 89%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Torres de Plata I     |        |                  |               |              
|Toa Alta, PR          | 72     | 72               | 100%          | 100%         
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|Tyrone Elderly        |        |                  |               |              
|Tyrone, PA            | 100    | 100              | 97%           | 98%          
|                      |        |                  |               |              
|TOTAL                 | 682    | 452              |               |              



(A)

Section 8 of Title II of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974.









Ownership Percentages



The following table details the Partnership ownership percentages of the Local Partnerships and the cost of acquisition of such ownership. All interests are limited partner interests. Also included is the total mortgage encumbrance on each property for each of the Local Partnerships as of December 31, 2007.



|                               |                 |                |         
|------------------------------ | --------------- | -------------- | --------
|                               |                 | Original       |         
|                               |                 | Cost of        |         
|                               | NTCP Percentage | Ownership      | Mortgage
|Partnership Name               | Interest        | Interest       | Notes   
|                               |                 | (in thousands)
|Apple Tree Apartments          | 99%             | $    224       | $   861 
|Glenark Associates, LP         | 5%              | 3,200          | (A)     
|Grand Meadows II LDHA LP       | 98.90%          | 1,585          | 1,712   
|Grinnell Park Apartments       | 99%             | 192            | 560     
|Seward Associates              | 99%             | 323            | 1,429   
|North Liberty Park, LP         | 99%             | 144            | 574     
|Rolling Hills Apartments, Ltd. | 99%             | 185            | 3,369   
|Art Museum  Wallace           | 99%             | 1,550          | (A)     
|Art Museum  Bergdoll          | 99%             | 603            | (A)     
|Art Museum - Chandler          | 99%             | 1,985          | (A)     
|Torres de Plata                | 99%             | 620            | 2,918   
|Tyrone Elderly                 | 99%             | 850            | 2,664   
|Total  December 31, 2007      |                 | $11,461        | $14,087 



(A)

Information is not available.



ITEM 2.

Description of Properties



See "Item 1. Description of Business" for the real estate owned by the Partnership through the ownership of limited partnership interests in Local Partnerships.



ITEM 3.

Legal Proceedings



The General Partner is involved in various lawsuits arising from transactions in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management and the General Partner, the claims will not result in any material liability to the Partnership.



ITEM 4.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders



No matters were submitted to a vote of the limited partners through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.









PART II



ITEM 5.

Market for the Registrant's Partnership Interests and Related Partnership Matters



The Limited Partnership Interests (LPI) are not traded on a public exchange but were sold through a public offering managed by PaineWebber Incorporated.  It is not anticipated that any active public market will develop for the purchase and sale of any Limited Partnership Interest, therefore an investor may be unable to sell or otherwise dispose of his or her interest in the Partnership.  Limited Partnership Interests may not be transferred but can be assigned only if certain requirements in the Partnership Agreement are satisfied.  At December 31, 2007, there were 3,337 registered holders of 23,752 Limited Partnership Interests in NTCP. The Partnership was not designed to provide cash distributions to Limited Partners in circumstances other than refinancing or disposition of its investments in Local Partnerships and then such distributions, if any, may be limited.  Distributions have not been made from the inception of the Partnership to December 31, 2007.



AIMCO and its affiliates owned 437 limited partnership interests in the Partnership representing 1.84% of the outstanding interests at December 31, 2007. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional limited partnership interests in the Partnership in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the limited partnership interests are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



ITEM 6.

Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation



This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other items contained elsewhere in this report.



The General Partner monitors developments in the area of legal and regulatory compliance.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



The Partnerships primary sources of funds include interest income from investing available cash and the receipt of distributions from Local Partnerships in which the Partnership has invested. It is not expected that any of the Local Partnerships in which the Partnership invested will generate cash from operations sufficient to provide distributions to the Limited Partners.  Such cash from operations, if any, would first be used to meet operating expenses of the Partnership.  The Partnership's investments are not readily marketable and may be affected by adverse general economic conditions which, in turn, could substantially increase the risk of operating losses for the Apartment Complexes, the Local Partnerships and the Partnership.  These problems may result from a number of factors, many of which cannot be controlled by the General Partner. The Partnerships cash reserves as of December 31, 2007 were approximately $84,000. In order to replenish the Partnership's reserves, the Partnership intends to generate additional cash from sales and refinancings of certain properties owned by Local Partnerships and through sales of the Partnerships limited partner interests in Local Partnerships.



Cash and cash equivalents are on deposit with a financial institution earning interest at market rates. Cash equivalents can be converted to cash to meet obligations of the Partnership as they arise. The Partnership intends to continue investing available funds in this manner.



In March 2005, the Local Operating General Partner of Countryview Columbus sold the property to a third party.  After the repayment of the mortgage encumbering the property and accounts payable, the Local Partnership repaid the Partnership during 2005 for advances of approximately $394,000 made to the Local Partnership.  The Partnership received approximately $99,000 as repayment of advances made prior to 2004 during the year ended December 31, 2006, which is included in distributions from limited partnerships recognized as income. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



In July 2006, the Partnership sold its limited partnership interest in Vinton/Park School to the Local Operating General Partner for approximately $16,000. After applying approximately $7,000 of the proceeds against advances receivable, the Partnership recorded a gain on sale of limited partnership interest of approximately $9,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Distributions received from Local Partnerships are recognized as a return of capital until the investment balance has been reduced to zero. Subsequent distributions received are recognized as income. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received distributions of approximately $104,000 and $161,000, respectively, of which approximately $60,000 and $161,000, respectively, were received from Local Partnerships in which it does not have an investment balance which were recognized as income.



The Partnership does not have the ability to assess Limited Partners for additional capital contributions to provide capital if needed by the Partnership or Local Partnerships.  Accordingly, if circumstances arise that cause the Local Partnerships to require capital in addition to that contributed by the Partnership and any equity of the local general partners, the only sources from which such capital needs will be able to be satisfied (other than the limited reserves available at the Partnership level) will be (i) third-party debt financing (which may not be available if, as expected, the Apartment Complexes owned by the Local Partnerships are already substantially leveraged), (ii) other equity sources (which could reduce the amount of Tax Credits being allocated to the Partnership, adversely affect the Partnership's interest in operating cash flow and/or proceeds of sale or refinancing of the Apartment Complexes and possibly even result in adverse tax consequences to the Limited Partners), or (iii) the sale or disposition of Apartment Complexes.  There can be no assurance that any of such sources would be readily available in sufficient proportions to fund the capital requirements of the Local Partnerships.  If such sources are not available, the Local Partnerships would risk foreclosure on their Apartment Complexes if they were unable to renegotiate the terms of their first mortgages and any other debt secured by the Apartment Complexes, which would have significant adverse tax consequences to the Limited Partners.



Results of Operations



The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions of the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation.  Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investment in the Local Partnerships using the equity method.  Thus the individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnerships share of the Local Partnerships losses, distributions and impairment charges.  However, since the Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Partnerships, or is not otherwise committed to providing additional support to them, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balances until the investment balance is reduced to zero. Subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the statements of operations included in Item 7. Financial Statements.  For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnerships policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received, and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Partnerships.  During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership recognized equity in loss and amortization of acquisition costs of approximately $81,000 and $91,000, respectively, from Local Partnerships.  During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership did not recognize equity in loss of approximately $761,000 and $709,000, respectively, as the Partnership's investment in certain Local Partnerships had been reduced to zero.



At December 31, 2007, the investment balance in eleven of the twelve Local Partnerships had been reduced to zero.



The Partnerships revenues consist primarily of interest income earned on temporary investment of funds not required for investment in Local Partnerships. Interest income was approximately $7,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.



An annual management fee is payable to the General Partner and is calculated at 0.5 percent of the original invested assets of the remaining partnerships. The management fee represents the annual recurring fee which will be paid to the General Partner for its continuing management of the Partnership's affairs.  Management fees were approximately $208,000 and $218,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The decrease in the management fee is a result of the reduction in invested assets on which such fee is based, due to the loss of Vinton/Park School in 2006.



Operating expenses, exclusive of the management fee, consist of legal and accounting fees for services rendered to the Partnership and general and administrative expenses.  Legal and accounting fees were approximately $121,000 and $82,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  The increase in legal and accounting expenses is primarily due to costs associated with the litigation involving Blue Lake in 2007 (as discussed below). General and administrative expenses were approximately $80,000 and $82,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.



Advances made by the Partnership to the individual Local Partnerships are considered part of the Partnerships investment in limited partnerships.  Advances made to Local Partnerships for which the investment has been reduced to zero are charged to expense.  During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $58,000 and $19,000, respectively, was advanced to the Local Partnerships, of which approximately $58,000 and $12,000, respectively, was recognized as expense on the statements of operations included in Item 7. Financial Statements. During the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately $7,000 of advances were repaid by one Local Partnership.  No such advances were repaid by Local Partnerships during the year ended December 31, 2007.



Because of (i) the nature of the Apartment Complexes, (ii) the difficulty of predicting the resale market for low-income housing in the future, and (iii) the inability of the Partnership to directly cause the sale of Apartment Complexes by local general partners, but generally only to require such local general partners to use their respective best efforts to find a purchaser for the Apartment Complexes, it is not possible at this time to predict whether the liquidation of substantially all of the Partnership's assets and the disposition of the proceeds, if any, in accordance with the Partnership Agreement will be able to be accomplished promptly at the end of the 15-year Compliance Period.  If a Local Partnership is unable to sell an Apartment Complex, it is anticipated that the local general partner will either continue to operate such Apartment Complex or take such other actions as the local general partner believes to be in the best interest of the Local Partnership.  In addition, circumstances beyond the control of the General Partner may occur during the Compliance Period which would require the Partnership to approve the disposition of an Apartment Complex prior to the end of the Compliance Period.



The Partnership, as a limited partner in the Local Partnerships in which it has invested, is subject to the risks incident to the management and ownership of improved real estate.  The Partnership's investments are also subject to adverse general economic conditions, and accordingly, the status of the national economy, including substantial unemployment and concurrent inflation, could increase vacancy levels, rental payment defaults, and operating expenses, which in turn, could substantially increase the risk of operating losses for the Apartment Complexes.



Comfed Qualified



In December 2007, the Local Operating General Partner of ComFed Qualified elected to exercise its option to purchase the Partnerships remaining 2.5% limited partnership interest in this Local Partnership. The Partnership received proceeds of less than $1,000 for its sale of interest in this Local Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Partnership had no investment balance remaining in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Summit I, II and III



The current local general partner, the Partnership and the previous local general partner entered into an agreement on May 31, 2005, in which the Partnership advanced to Summit I and Summit III approximately $100,000 and $66,000, respectively, to cover a portion of delinquent property tax obligations, and the previous local general partner advanced the next three quarterly tax payments for the delinquent property taxes of approximately $27,000 for Summit I and $18,000 for Summit III. In addition, the current local general partner is negotiating with the previous local general partner to correct certain Section 42 non-compliance issues at all three properties as a result of Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") recapture letters received in 2004.  If the Section 42 non-compliance issues are resolved with the IRS and the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, then the previous local general partner may be readmitted into all three Local Partnerships.  If the Section 42 non-compliance issues cannot be resolved, the limited partners may be subject to the recapture of Tax Credits related to these Local Partnerships.  The Partnership reserved for the advances made to the Local Partnerships, as the repayment of the advances is not probable.



Blue Lake



In 2003, the property owned by Blue Lake was sold without the consent or knowledge of the Partnership and without the requisite recapture bond. The Partnership has filed an action against the general partner of the Local Partnership. Trial is scheduled for May 2008. The Partnership had no investment in the Blue Lake Local Partnership at December 31, 2007. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, neither the Partnership nor the General Partner is subject to a liability to the limited partners of the Partnership for the amounts of Tax Credits at risk of recapture as a result of the recapture bond not being obtained at the time of the sale of the property. The limited partners will be responsible for any tax credit recapture liability on their respective income tax returns.



Countryview Columbus



In March 2005, the Local Operating General Partner of Countryview Columbus sold the property to a third party.  After the repayment of the mortgage encumbering the property and accounts payable, the Local Partnership repaid the Partnership during 2005 for advances of approximately $394,000 made to the Local Partnership. The Partnership received approximately $99,000 as repayment of advances made prior to 2004 during the year ended December 31, 2006, which is included in distributions from Local Partnerships recognized as income. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.







Vinton/Park School



In July 2006, the Partnership sold its limited partnership interest in Vinton/Park School to the Local Operating General Partner for approximately $16,000. After applying approximately $7,000 of the proceeds against advances receivable, the Partnership recorded a gain on sale of limited partnership interest of approximately $9,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements



The Partnership owns limited partnership interests in unconsolidated Local Partnerships, in which the Partnerships ownership percentage ranges from 5% to 99%. However, based on the provisions of the relevant partnership agreements, the Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (see Note 1  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the financial statements in Item 7. Financial Statements).  There are no lines of credit, side agreements or any other derivative financial instruments between the Local Partnerships and the Partnership.  Accordingly the Partnerships maximum risk of loss related to these unconsolidated Local Partnerships is limited to the recorded investments in and receivables from the Local Partnerships.  See Note 2  Investments in and Advances to Local Partnerships of the financial statements in Item 7. Financial Statements for additional information about the Partnerships investments in unconsolidated Local Partnerships.



Other



AIMCO and its affiliates owned 437 limited partnership interests in the Partnership representing 1.84% of the outstanding interests at December 31, 2007. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional limited partnership interests in the Partnership in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the limited partnership interests are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



FASB Interpretation No. 46



As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (or FIN 46), and applied its requirements to all Local Partnerships in which the Partnership held a variable interest.  FIN 46 addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities.  Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics:  (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entitys activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entitys activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.  FIN 46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE.









At December 31, 2007, the Partnership holds variable interests in seven VIEs that consist of Local Partnerships in which the Partnership acquired an interest prior to the adoption of FIN 46 that are directly engaged in the ownership and management of seven apartment properties with a total of 266 units.  The Partnership is involved with those VIEs as a non-controlling limited partner equity holder.  The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the Partnerships recorded investments in and receivables from those VIEs, which was approximately $724,000 at December 31, 2007. The Partnership may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that the Partnership voluntarily provides in the future.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates



A summary of the Partnerships significant accounting policies is included in "Note 1  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" which is included in the financial statements in "Item 7. Financial Statements".  The General Partner believes that the consistent application of these policies enables the Partnership to provide readers of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about the Partnerships operating results and financial condition.  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements as well as reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.  Judgments and assessments of uncertainties are required in applying the Partnerships accounting policies in many areas.   The Partnership believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.



Method of Accounting for Investments in Limited Partnerships



The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Partnerships using the equity method. The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 5% and 99%). The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Partnerships partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnerships distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Partnership.



The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnerships share of the Local Partnerships profits less the Partnerships share of the Local Partnerships losses, distributions and impairment charges. See Item 7. Financial Statements, Note 1  Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for a description of the impairment policy. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income on the statements of operations included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnerships policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Partnerships.  Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize.









ITEM 7.

Financial Statements





NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.



LIST OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Balance Sheet - December 31, 2007



Statements of Operations - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Statements of Changes in Partners' (Deficiency) Capital - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Statements of Cash Flows - Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006



Notes to Financial Statements









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Partners

National Tax Credit Partners, L.P.





We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of operations, changes in partners' (deficiency) capital and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.



We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those stan­dards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. as of December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.







/s/Ernst & Young LLP

Greenville, South Carolina

April 14, 2008











|                                  
|----------------------------------
|NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.
|                                  
|BALANCE SHEET                     
|                                  
|December 31, 2007                 
|(in thousands)                    







|                                                           |          |        
|---------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------
|Assets                                                     |          |        
|                                                           |          |        
|Investments in and advances to Local Partnerships (Note 2) |          | $   724
|Cash and cash equivalents                                  |          | 84     
|                                                           |          |        
|Total assets                                               |          | $808   
|                                                           |          |        
|Liabilities and partners' (deficiency) capital             |          |        
|                                                           |          |        
|Liabilities:                                               |          |        
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                      |          | $   39 
|Accrued fees due to affiliates (Note 3)                    |          | 682    
|                                                           |          |        
|Contingencies (Note 5)                                     |          |        
|                                                           |          |        
|Partners' (deficiency) capital                             |          |        
|General partner                                            | $  (518) |        
|Limited partners                                           | 605      | 87     
|                                                           |          |        
|Total liabilities and partners' (deficiency) capital       |          | $808   



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements











|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.      
|                                        
|STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS                
|(in thousands, except per interest data)







|                                                   |                          |          
|-------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------
|                                                   | Years Ended December 31,
|                                                   | 2007                     | 2006     
|Revenues:                                          |                          |          
|Interest income                                    | $7                       | $7       
|                                                   |                          |          
|Operating expenses:                                |                          |          
|Management fees - partners (Note 3)                | 208                      | 218      
|Legal and accounting                               | 121                      | 82       
|General and administrative (Note 3)                | 80                       | 82       
|Total operating expenses                           | 409                      | 382      
|                                                   |                          |          
|Loss from Partnership operations                   | (402)                    | (375)    
|Gain on sale of limited partnership interest       |                          |          
|(Note 2)                                           | --                       | 9        
|Distributions from Local Partnerships recognized   |                          |          
|as income (Note 2)                                 | 60                       | 161      
|Advances to Local Partnerships charged to expense  |                          |          
|(Note 2)                                           | (58)                     | (12)     
|Equity in loss of Local Partnerships and           |                          |          
|amortization of acquisition costs (Note 2)         | (81)                     | (91)     
|                                                   |                          |          
|Net loss (Note 4)                                  | $(481)                   | $(308)   
|                                                   |                          |          
|Net loss allocated to general partner (1%)         | $     (5)                | $     (3)
|Net loss allocated to limited partners (99%)       | (476)                    | (305)    
|                                                   | $(481)                   | $(308)   
|                                                   |                          |          
|Net loss per limited partnership interest (Note 1) | $(20.02)                 | $(12.76) 



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements











|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.                     
|                                                       
|STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' (DEFICIENCY) CAPITAL
|                                                       
|(in thousands, except interest data)                   







|                                |         |          |        
|------------------------------- | ------- | -------- | -------
|                                |         |          |        
|                                | General | Limited  |        
|                                | Partner | Partners | Total  
|                                |         |          |        
|Partnership interests (Note 1)  |         | 23,752   |        
|                                |         |          |        
|Partners' (deficiency) capital, |         |          |        
|December 31, 2005               | $ (510) | $ 1,386  | $   876
|                                |         |          |        
|Net loss for the year ended     |         |          |        
|December 31, 2006               | (3)     | (305)    | (308)  
|                                |         |          |        
|Partners' (deficiency) capital, |         |          |        
|December 31, 2006               | (513)   | 1,081    | 568    
|                                |         |          |        
|Net loss for the year ended     |         |          |        
|December 31, 2007               | (5)     | (476)    | (481)  
|                                |         |          |        
|Partners' (deficiency) capital, |         |          |        
|December 31, 2007               | $(518)  | $605     | $87    



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements











|                                  
|----------------------------------
|NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.
|                                  
|STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS          
|                                  
|(in thousands)                    







|                                                     |                          |         
|---------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------
|                                                     | Years Ended December 31,
|                                                     | 2007                     | 2006    
|Cash flows from operating activities:                |                          |         
|Net loss                                             | $  (481)                 | $  (308)
|Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash        |                          |         
|(used in) provided by operating activities:          |                          |         
|Gain on sale of limited partnership interest         | --                       | (9)     
|Equity in loss of Local Partnerships and             |                          |         
|amortization of acquisition costs                    | 81                       | 91      
|Advances to Local Partnerships charged to expense    | 58                       | 12      
|Changes in accounts:                                 |                          |         
|Accrued fees due to affiliates                       | 265                      | 273     
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                | (10)                     | (7)     
|Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities  | (87)                     | 52      
|                                                     |                          |         
|Cash flows from investing activities:                |                          |         
|Distribution from Local Partnership recognized as a  |                          |         
|reduction of investment balance                      | 44                       | --      
|Proceeds from sale of limited partnership interest   | --                       | 9       
|Repayment of advances to Local Partnership           | --                       | 7       
|Advances to Local Partnerships                       | (58)                     | (19)    
|Net cash used in investing activities                | (14)                     | (3)     
|                                                     |                          |         
|Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (101)                    | 49      
|Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year         | 185                      | 136     
|                                                     |                          |         
|Cash and cash equivalents, end of year               | $84                      | $185    



See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements













NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007



Note 1 -

Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Organization



National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership") was formed under the California Revised Limited Partnership Act and organized on March 7, 1989.  The Partnership was formed to invest primarily in other limited partnerships (the Local Partnerships) which own and operate multifamily housing complexes that are eligible for low income housing tax credits or, in certain cases, for historic rehabilitation tax credits.  The general partner of the Partnership (the "General Partner") is National Partnership Investments Corp., a California corporation ("NAPICO").  The General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIMCO), a publicly traded real estate investment trust. The business of the Partnership is conducted primarily by NAPICO.



The Partnership originally registered 14,000 units, consisting of 28,000 Limited Partnership Interests ("LPI"), and warrants to purchase a maximum of 14,000 Additional Limited Partnership Interests ("ALPI").  The term of the offering expired in June 1990, at which date the Partnership raised $59,749,000 from the sale of 16,336 LPI and warrants representing 7,563 ALPI.



The General Partner has a 1% interest in operating profits and losses of the Partnership.  The limited partners will be allocated the remaining 99% interest in proportion to their respective investments.



The Partnership shall continue in full force and effect until December 31, 2029, unless terminated prior to that, pursuant to the partnership agreement or law.



Basis of Presentation



The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.



Use of Estimates



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Method of Accounting for Investments in Local Partnerships



The investments in Local Partnerships are accounted for using the equity method.  Acquisition, selection and other costs related to the acquisition of the projects acquired are capitalized as part of the investment accounts and are being amortized by the straight line method over the estimated lives of the underlying assets, which is generally 30 years.



Abandoned Interests



During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the number of Limited Partnership Interests decreased by 20 and 127 interests, respectively, due to limited partners abandoning their interests. In abandoning his or her Limited Partnership Interests, a limited partner relinquishes all right, title, and interest in the Partnership as of the date of abandonment.











Net Loss Per Limited Partnership Interest



Net loss per limited partnership interest was computed by dividing the limited partners' share of net loss by the number of limited partnership interests outstanding at the beginning of the year.  The number of limited partnership interests was 23,772 and 23,899 as of January 1, 2007 and 2006, respectively.



Cash and Cash Equivalents



Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market mutual funds.  At certain times, the amount of cash deposited at a bank may exceed the limit on insured deposits.  The entire cash balance at December 31, 2007 is maintained by an affiliated management company on behalf of affiliated entities in a cash concentration account.



Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



The Partnership reviews its investments in long-lived assets to determine if there has been any impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  If the sum of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets, the Partnership recognizes an impairment loss. No adjustments for impairment of value were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2007 or 2006.



Segment Reporting



Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information", established standards for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports.  SFAS No. 131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas, and major customers.  As defined in SFAS No. 131, the Partnership has only one reportable segment.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments



SFAS No. 107, "Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments", as amended by SFAS No. 119, "Disclosures about Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments.  Fair value is defined in the SFAS as the amount at which the instruments

could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Partnership believes that the carrying amount of its financial instruments approximates their fair value due to the short term maturity of these instruments.



FASB Interpretation No. 46



As of December 31, 2004, the Partnership adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (or FIN 46), and applied its requirements to all Local Partnerships in which the Partnership held a variable interest. FIN 46 addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities.  Generally, a variable interest entity, or VIE, is an entity with one or more of the following characteristics:  (a) the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support; (b) as a group the holders of the equity investment at risk lack (i) the ability to make decisions about an entitys activities through voting or similar rights, (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity, or (iii) the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportional to their economic interests and substantially all of the entitys activities either involve, or are conducted on behalf of, an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.  FIN
46 requires a VIE to be consolidated in the financial statements of the entity that is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE.



At December 31, 2007, the Partnership holds variable interests in seven VIEs that consist of Local Partnerships in which the Partnership acquired an interest prior to the adoption of FIN 46 that are directly engaged in the ownership and management of seven apartment properties with a total of 266 units.  The Partnership is involved with those VIEs as a non-controlling limited partner equity holder.  The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with unconsolidated VIEs is limited to the Partnerships recorded investments in and receivables from those VIEs, which was approximately $724,000 at December 31, 2007. The Partnership may be subject to additional losses to the extent of any financial support that the Partnership voluntarily provides in the future.



Recent Accounting Pronouncements



In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards require assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes the information used in developing fair value estimates. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the reporting entitys own data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value measurements of non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applicable to recurring fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, which for the Partnership is generally limited to annual disclosures required by SFAS No. 107.  The Partnership is in the process of implementing SFAS No. 157; however, it has not completed its evaluation and thus has not yet determined the effect that SFAS No. 157 will have on the Partnerships financial statements.



In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Partnership adopted SFAS No. 159 on January 1, 2008, and at that time did not elect the fair value option for any of its financial instruments or other items within the scope of SFAS No. 159.



In June 2007, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (the AICPA) issued Statement of Position No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies ("SOP 07-1").  SOP 07-1 provides guidance for determining whether the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies are required to be applied to an entity by clarifying the definition of an investment company and, whether investment company accounting should be retained by a parent company upon consolidation of an investment company subsidiary, or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting to an investment company investee.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position SOP 07-1-1 that indefinitely defers the effective date of SOP 07-1.



Note 2 - Investments in and Advances to Local Partnerships



At December 31, 2007, the Partnership holds limited partnership interests in twelve Local Partnerships, located in six states and Puerto Rico. At December 31, 2007, the Local Partnerships own residential projects consisting of 682 apartment units. The general partners responsible for management of the Local Partnerships (the "Local Operating General Partners") are not affiliated with the General Partner of the Partnership, except as discussed below.



National Tax Credit, Inc. ("NTC"), an affiliate of the General Partner, typically serves either as a special limited partner or non-managing administrative general partner in which case it receives 0.01 percent of operating profits and losses of the Local Partnerships. NTC or another affiliate of the general partner may serve as the Local Operating General Partner of the Local Partnership in which case it is typically entitled to 0.09 percent of operating profits and losses of the respective Local Partnership.  The Partnership is also generally entitled to receive 50 percent of the net cash flow generated by the Apartment Complexes, subject to repayment of any loans made to the Local Partnerships (including loans provided by NTC or an affiliate), repayment for funding of development deficit and operating deficit guarantees by the Local Operating General Partners or their affiliates (excluding NTC and its affiliates), and certain priority payments to the Local Operating General Partners other than NTC or its affiliates.



The Partnership, as a limited partner, does not have a contractual relationship with the Local Partnerships or exercise control over the activities and operations, including refinancing or selling decisions, of the Local Partnerships that would require or allow for consolidation. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Local Partnerships using the equity method.  The Partnership is allocated profits and losses of the Local Partnerships based upon its respective ownership percentage (between 5% and 99%). The Partnership is allocated profits and losses and receives distributions from refinancings and sales in accordance with the Local Partnerships partnership agreements. These agreements usually limit the Partnerships distributions to an amount substantially less than its ownership percentage in the Local Partnership.



The individual investments are carried at cost plus the Partnerships share of the Local Partnerships profits less the Partnerships share of the Local Partnerships losses, distributions and impairment charges. The Partnership is not legally liable for the obligations of the Local Partnerships and is not otherwise committed to provide additional support to them. Therefore, it does not recognize losses once its investment in each of the Local Partnerships reaches zero.  Distributions from the Local Partnerships are accounted for as a reduction of the investment balance until the investment balance is reduced to zero. When the investment balance has been reduced to zero, subsequent distributions received are recognized as income in the accompanying statements of operations.  During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Partnership received distributions of approximately $104,000 and $161,000, respectively, of which approximately $60,000 and $161,000, respectively, were received from Local Partnerships in which it does not have an investment balance which were recognized as income.



For those investments where the Partnership has determined that the carrying value of its investments approximates the estimated fair value of those investments, the Partnerships policy is to recognize equity in income of the Local Partnerships only to the extent of distributions received and amortization of acquisition costs from those Local Partnerships. Therefore, the Partnership limits its recognition of equity earnings to the amount it expects to ultimately realize.



As of December 31, 2007, the investment balance in eleven of the twelve Local Partnerships had been reduced to zero.



Advances made by the Partnership to the individual Local Partnerships are considered part of the Partnership's investment in limited partnerships.  Advances made to Local Partnerships for which the investment has been reduced to zero are charged to expense.  During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $58,000 and $19,000, respectively, was advanced to the Local Partnerships, of which approximately $58,000 and $12,000, respectively, was recognized as expense on the accompanying statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2006, approximately $7,000 of advances were repaid by one Local Partnership.  No such advances were repaid by Local Partnerships during the year ended December 31, 2007.



The following is a summary of the investments in Local Partnerships for the year ended December 31, 2007 (in thousands):



|                                                     |        
|---------------------------------------------------- | -------
|Investment balance, beginning of year                | $   849
|Equity in losses of Local Partnership                | (73)   
|Amortization of acquisition costs                    | (8)    
|Distribution recognized as a reduction of investment |        
|balance                                              | (44)   
|Investment balance, end of year                      | $724   



The difference between the investment per the accompanying balance sheet at December 31, 2007 and the equity per the Local Partnerships' combined financial statements is due primarily to cumulative unrecognized equity in losses of certain Local Partnerships, the Partnerships recording of capital contributions payable to the Local Partnerships in its investment balance, costs capitalized to the investment account, cumulative distributions recognized as income and the recognition of impairment losses.



Comfed Qualified



In December 2007, the Local Operating General Partner of ComFed Qualified elected to exercise its option to purchase the Partnerships remaining 2.5% limited partnership interest in this Local Partnership. The Partnership received proceeds of less than $1,000 for its sale of interest in this Local Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Partnership had no investment balance remaining in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Summit I, II and III



The current local general partner, the Partnership and the previous local general partner entered into an agreement on May 31, 2005, in which the Partnership advanced to Summit I and Summit III approximately $100,000 and $66,000, respectively, to cover a portion of delinquent property tax obligations, and the previous local general partner advanced the next three quarterly tax payments for the delinquent property taxes of approximately $27,000 for Summit I and $18,000 for Summit III. In addition, the current local general partner is negotiating with the previous local general partner to correct certain Section 42 non-compliance issues at all three properties as a result of Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") recapture letters received in 2004.  If the Section 42 non-compliance issues are resolved with the IRS and the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, then the previous local general partner may be readmitted into all three Local Partnerships.  If the Section 42 non-compliance issues cannot be resolved, the limited partners may be subject to the recapture of Tax Credits related to these Local Partnerships.  The Partnership reserved for the advances made to the Local Partnerships, as the repayment of the advances is not probable.



Blue Lake



In 2003, the property owned by Blue Lake was sold without the consent or knowledge of the Partnership and without the requisite recapture bond. The Partnership has filed an action against the general partner of the Local Partnership. Trial is scheduled for May 2008. The Partnership had no investment in the Blue Lake Local Partnership at December
31, 2007. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, neither the Partnership nor the General Partner is subject to a liability to the limited partners of the Partnership for the amounts of Tax Credits at risk of recapture as a result of the recapture bond not being obtained at the time of the sale of the property. The limited partners will be responsible for any tax credit recapture liability on their respective income tax returns.



Countryview Columbus



In March 2005, the Local Operating General Partner of Countryview Columbus sold the property to a third party.  After the repayment of the mortgage encumbering the property and accounts payable, the Local Partnership repaid the Partnership during 2005 for advances of approximately $394,000 made to the Local Partnership. The Partnership received approximately $99,000 as repayment of advances made prior to 2004 during the year ended December 31, 2006, which is included in distributions from Local Partnerships recognized as income. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Vinton/Park School



In July 2006, the Partnership sold its limited partnership interest in Vinton/Park School to the Local Operating General Partner for approximately $16,000. After applying approximately $7,000 of the proceeds against advances receivable, the Partnership recorded a gain on sale of limited partnership interest of approximately $9,000 during the year ended December 31, 2006. The Partnership had no investment balance in this Local Partnership at December 31, 2007.



Investee Data



The Partnerships value of its investments and its equity in the income/losses and distributions from the Local Partnerships are, for certain Local Partnerships, individually not material to the overall financial position of the Partnership. The financial information from the unaudited combined financial statements of such Local Partnerships at December 31, 2007 and for each of the two years in the period then ended is presented below. The Partnerships value of its investment in Tyrone Elderly Limited Partnership (the Material Investee) is material to its financial position and the amounts included below for this specific Local Partnership are included on an audited basis (2007 and 2006 amounts exclude the operations of Vinton/Park School for which the Partnership sold its interest in 2006, Ridgewood Heights, for which the Partnership sold its interest in 2007 and Summit I, II, and III and Glenark Landing, for which no information is available).











CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

OF THE LOCAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS

December 31, 2007



|                                                 |          |           |        
|------------------------------------------------ | -------- | --------- | -------
|                                                 | Material |           |        
|Assets:                                          | Investee | Unaudited | Total  
|Land                                             | $   209  | $ 1,477   | $ 1,686
|Buildings and improvements, net of               |          |           |        
|accumulated depreciation of $2,612 and           |          |           |        
|$12,434, respectively                            | 2,929    | 11,883    | 14,812 
|Other assets                                     | 316      | 1,798     | 2,114  
|Total Assets                                     | $3,454   | $15,158   | $18,612
|                                                 |          |           |        
|Liabilities and Partner's Equity (Deficit):      |          |           |        
|Liabilities:                                     |          |           |        
|Mortgages notes payable                          | $ 2,664  | $11,423   | $14,087
|Other liabilities                                | 111      | 13,569    | 13,680 
|                                                 | 2,775    | 24,992    | 27,767 
|Partner's Equity (Deficit)                       | 679      | (9,834)   | (9,155)
|Total Liabilities and Partners' Equity (Deficit) | $3,454   | $15,158   | $18,612





CONDENSED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OF THE LOCAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS



|                              |                          |           |        |          |           |       
|----------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------- | ------ | -------- | --------- | ------
|                              | Years Ended December 31,
|                              | 2007                     |           |        | 2006     |           |       
|                              | Material                 | 2007      | 2007   | Material | 2006      | 2006  
|                              | Investee                 | Unaudited | Total  | Investee | Unaudited | Total 
|Revenues:                     |                          |           |        |          |           |       
|Rental and other income       | $826                     | $3,723    | $4,549 | $859     | $3,642    | $4,501
|Expenses:                     |                          |           |        |          |           |       
|Operating expenses            | 493                      | 2,505     | 2,998  | 472      | 2,427     | 2,899 
|Financial expenses            | 167                      | 1,385     | 1,552  | 197      | 1,363     | 1,560 
|Depreciation and amortization | 240                      | 752       | 992    | 205      | 732       | 937   
|Total Expenses                | 900                      | 4,642     | 5,542  | 874      | 4,522     | 5,396 
|Net loss                      | $(74)                    | $(919)    | $(993) | $(15)    | $(880)    | $(895)



Note 3 - Transactions with Affiliated Parties



Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of the Limited Partnership, the Partnership is obligated to the General Partner for the following fees:



(a) An annual Partnership management fee in an amount equal to 0.5 percent of invested assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) as of the beginning of the year is payable to the General Partner.  For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately $208,000 and $218,000, respectively, has been expensed.  At December 31, 2007, approximately $546,000 is owed to the General Partner and is included in accrued fees due to affiliates.



(b) A property disposition fee is payable to the General Partner in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) one-half of the competitive real estate commission that would have been charged by unaffiliated third parties providing comparable services in the area where the apartment complex is located, or (ii) 3 percent of the sales price received in connection with the sale or disposition of the apartment complex or local partnership interest, but in no event will the property disposition fee and all amounts payable to
unaffiliated real estate brokers in connection with any such sale exceed in the aggregate, the lesser of the competitive rate (as described above) or 6 percent of such sale price.  Receipt of the property disposition fee will be subordinated to the distribution of sale or refinancing proceeds by the Partnership until the limited partners have received distributions from sale or refinancing proceeds in an aggregate amount equal to (i) their 10 percent priority return for any year not theretofore satisfied (as defined in the partnership agreement) and (ii) an amount equal to the aggregate adjusted investment (as defined in the partnership agreement) of the limited partners.  No disposition fees have been paid.



(c) The Partnership reimburses NAPICO for certain expenses.  The reimbursement to NAPICO was approximately $49,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and is included in general and administrative expenses. At December 31, 2007, approximately $136,000 is owed to NAPICO and is included in accrued fees due to affiliates.



As of December 31, 2007, the fees and advances due the General Partner exceeded the Partnerships cash. The General Partner has indicated that, during the forthcoming year, it will not demand payment of amounts due in excess of such cash, however, the Partnership still remains liable for all such amounts.



NTC, or another affiliate of the General Partner, is the Local Operating General Partner in six of the Partnership's twelve Local Partnerships.  In addition, NTC is either a special limited partner or an administrative general partner in each Local Partnership.



An affiliate of the General Partner managed one property owned by the Local Partnership during each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.  The Local Partnership pays the affiliate property management fees in the amount of 5 percent of their gross rental revenues.  The amounts paid were approximately $38,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.



AIMCO and its affiliates owned 437 limited partnership interests in the Partnership representing 1.84% of the outstanding interests at December 31, 2007. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional limited partnership interests in the Partnership in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the limited partnership interests are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Note 4 - Income Taxes



The Partnership is not taxed on its income.  The partners are taxed in their individual capacities based on their distributive share of the Partnerships taxable income or loss and are allowed the benefits to be derived from off-setting their distributive share of the tax losses against taxable income from other sources subject to passive loss limitations. The taxable income or loss differs from amounts included in the statements of operations because different methods are used in determining the losses of the Local Partnerships as discussed below.  The tax loss is allocated to the partner groups in accordance with Section 704 (b) of the Internal Revenue Code and therefore is not necessarily proportionate to the interest percentage owned.





A reconciliation follows:



|                                     |                          |          
|------------------------------------ | ------------------------ | ---------
|                                     | Years Ended December 31,
|                                     | 2007                     | 2006     
|                                     | (in thousands)          
|                                     |                         
|Net loss per financial statements    | $   (481)                | $   (308)
|Gain/loss on sale of investment      | --                       | (122)    
|Partnership fees                     | 208                      | 218      
|Other                                | (103)                    | 38       
|Partnership's share of limited local |                          |          
|partnership                          | (1,023)                  | (1,913)  
|Loss per preliminary tax return      | $(1,399)                 | $(2,087) 
|Preliminary taxable loss per limited |                          |          
|partnership interest                 | $(58.80)                 | $(87.38) 



The following is a reconciliation between the Partnerships reported amounts and the Federal tax basis of net assets and liabilities:



|                                    |                  
|----------------------------------- | -----------------
|                                    | December 31, 2007
|                                    | (in thousands)   
|Net assets as reported              | $     87         
|Add (deduct):                       |                  
|Intangible (net)                    | 3,355            
|Deferred offering costs             | 7,745            
|Investment in Partnerships          | (15,517)         
|Other                               | 1,329            
|Net liabilities  Federal tax basis | $(3,001)         



Note 5 - Contingencies



The General Partner is involved in various lawsuits arising from transactions in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management and the General Partner, the claims will not result in any material liability to the Partnership.













Note 6 - Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation of Local Partnerships in which NTCP Has Invested as of December 31, 2007



|                     |          |                               |           |          |                | 
|-------------------- | -------- | ----------------------------- | --------- | -------- | -------------- | 
|                     |          |                               |           |          |               
|                     |          | Gross Amount At Which Carried |           |         
|                     |          | at December 31, 2007 (1)      |           |         
|                     |          | (in thousands)                |           |         
|                     |          |                               |           |          |               
|                     |          |                               | Buildings |          |               
|                     |          |                               | And       |          |               
|                     |          |                               | Related   |          |               
|                     | Mortgage |                               | Personal  |          | Accumulated   
|Description          | Notes    | Land                          | Property  | Total    | Depreciation  
|                     |          |                               |           |          | (in thousands)
|Appletree Apts.      | $    861 | $     74                      | $  1,276  | $  1,350 | $    615      
|Glenark Apts. (A)    | --       | --                            | --        | --       | --            
|Grand Meadows Apts.  | 1,712    | 112                           | 3,537     | 3,649    | 1,727         
|Grinnell Park Apts.  | 560      | 48                            | 812       | 860      | 392           
|Kimberly Court Apts. | 1,429    | 234                           | 1,867     | 2,101    | 881           
|North Liberty Apts.  | 574      | 48                            | 739       | 787      | 387           
|Rolling Hills Apts.  | 3,369    | 800                           | 12,301    | 13,101   | 6,038         
|Summit I Apts. (A)   | --       | --                            | --        | --       | --            
|Summit II Apts. (A)  | --       | --                            | --        | --       | --            
|Summit III Apts. (A) | --       | --                            | --        | --       | --            
|Torres de Plata I    | 2,918    | 161                           | 3,785     | 3,946    | 2,394         
|Tyrone Elderly (B)   | 2,664    | 209                           | 5,541     | 5,750    | 2,612         
|                     | $14,087  | $1,686                        | $29,858   | $31,544  | $15,046       



(A) Information is not available for this entity.



(B) Material Investee.



(1) All amounts are unaudited except for those amounts relative to the Material Investee  see Note 2.



Reconciliation of real estate (all amounts are unaudited except for those amounts relative to the Material Investee  see Note 2) (in thousands)



|                             |                         |           |          |          |           |         
|---------------------------- | ----------------------- | --------- | -------- | -------- | --------- | --------
|                             | Years Ended December 31
|                             | 2007                    |           |          | 2006     |           |         
|                             | Material                | 2007      | 2007     | Material | 2006      | 2006    
|                             | Investee                | Unaudited | Total    | Investee | Unaudited | Total   
|Balance at beginning of year | $ 5,703                 | $25,581   | $ 31,284 | $ 5,258  | $25,399   | $ 30,657
|Improvements during the year | 47                      | 213       | 260      | 445      | 212       | 657     
|Disposal of property         | --                      | --        | --       | --       | (30)      | (30)    
|Balance at end of year       | $5,750                  | $25,794   | $31,544  | $5,703   | $25,581   | $31,284 













Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation (all amounts are unaudited except for those amounts relative to the Material Investee  see Note 2) (in thousands)



|                             |                          |           |         |          |           |         | 
|---------------------------- | ------------------------ | --------- | ------- | -------- | --------- | ------- | 
|                             | Years Ended December 31,
|                             | 2007                     |           |         | 2006     |           |        
|                             | Material                 | 2007      | 2007    | Material | 2006      | 2006   
|                             | Investee                 | Unaudited | Total   | Investee | Unaudited | Total  
|Balance at beginning of year | $ 2,372                  | $11,685   | $14,057 | $ 2,167  | $10,983   | $13,150
|Depreciation expense for the |                          |           |         |          |           |        
|year                         | 240                      | 749       | 989     | 205      | 732       | 937    
|Disposal of property         | --                       | --        | --      | --       | (30)      | (30)   
|Balance at end of year       | $2,612                   | $12,434   | $15,046 | $2,372   | $11,685   | $14,057













ITEM 8.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures



None.



ITEM 8A.

Controls and Procedures



(a)

Disclosure Controls and Procedures



The Partnerships management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Partnerships disclosure controls and procedures are effective.



Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



The Partnerships management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the principal executive and principal financial officers of the General Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnerships principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, and effected by the Partnerships management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:



·

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets;



·

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the Partnerships management; and



·

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



The Partnerships management assessed the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007.  In making this assessment, the Partnerships management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.



Based on their assessment, the Partnerships management concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting is effective.



This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnerships registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to the attestation by the Partnerships registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Partnership to provide only managements report in this annual report.



(b)

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



There have been no significant changes in the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fourth quarter of 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting.



ITEM 8B.

Other Information



None.











PART III



ITEM 9.

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters, Control Persons, and Corporate Governance; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act



National Tax Credit Partners, L.P. (the Partnership or the Registrant) has no directors or officers.  The general partner responsible for conducting the business of the Partnership is National Partnership Investments Corp a California Corporation (NAPICO or the General Partner).



The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the present directors and officers of NAPICO are set forth below:  The General Partner manages and controls substantially all of the Partnerships affairs and has general responsibility and ultimate authority in all matters affecting its business. There are no family relationships between or among any directors or officers.



|                   |     |                                                        
|------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------------------
|Name               | Age | Position                                               
|David R. Robertson | 42  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director        
|Harry G. Alcock    | 45  | Executive Vice President and Director                  
|Lance J. Graber    | 46  | Executive Vice President                               
|Lisa R. Cohn       | 39  | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|Patti K. Fielding  | 44  | Executive Vice President, Securities and Debt; Treasury
|Thomas M. Herzog   | 45  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   
|Martha L. Long     | 48  | Senior Vice President                                  
|Stephen B. Waters  | 46  | Vice President                                         



David R. Robertson has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the  General Partner since October 2002. Mr. Robertson has been an Executive Vice President of AIMCO since February 2002, and was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of AIMCO Capital in October 2002.  Mr. Robertson is responsible for portfolio strategy, capital allocation, investments, joint ventures, asset management and transaction activity. Since February 1996, Mr. Robertson has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Robeks Corporation, a privately held chain of specialty food stores.



Harry G. Alcock was appointed as a Director of the General Partner in October 2004 and was appointed Executive Vice President of the General Partner in February 2004 and has been Executive Vice President of AIMCO since October 1999.  Mr. Alcock has had responsibility for acquisition and financing activities of AIMCO since July 1994, serving as Vice President from July 1996 to October 1997 and as Senior Vice President from October 1997 to October 1999.  Mr. Alcock focuses on transactions related to AIMCOs portfolio of properties in the western portion of the United States.



Lance J. Graber was appointed Executive Vice President of the General Partner in February 2004 and of AIMCO in October 1999 and focuses on transactions related to Aimcos portfolio of properties in the eastern portion of the United States.



Lisa R. Cohn was appointed Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the General Partner and AIMCO in December 2007.  From January 2004 to December 2007, Ms. Cohn served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of AIMCO.  Ms. Cohn joined AIMCO in July 2002 as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel.  Prior to joining AIMCO, Ms. Cohn was in private practice with the law firm of Hogan and Hartson LLP.



Patti K. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President - Securities and Debt; Treasury of the General Partner in May 2007. Ms. Fielding was appointed Executive Vice President of AIMCO in February 2003 and also appointed as Treasurer of AIMCO in January 2005. Ms. Fielding is responsible for debt financing and the treasury department.  Ms. Fielding previously served as Senior Vice President - Securities and Debt of AIMCO from January 2000 to February 2003.  Ms. Fielding joined AIMCO in February 1997 as a Vice President.





Thomas M. Herzog was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner in May 2007. Mr. Herzog was appointed Chief Financial Officer of AIMCO in November 2005 and was appointed Executive Vice President AIMCO in July 2005.  In January 2004, Mr. Herzog joined AIMCO as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining AIMCO in January 2004, Mr. Herzog was at GE Real Estate, serving as Chief Accounting Officer & Global Controller from April 2002 to January 2004 and as Chief Technical Advisor from March 2000 to April 2002.  Prior to joining GE Real Estate, Mr. Herzog was at Deloitte & Touche LLP from 1990 to 2000.



Martha L. Long was appointed Senior Vice President of the General Partner in May 2007.  Ms. Long has been with AIMCO since October 1998 and has served in various capacities. From 1998 to 2001, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President and Controller of AIMCO. During 2002 and 2003, Ms. Long served as Senior Vice President of Continuous Improvement for AIMCO.



Stephen B. Waters was appointed Vice President of the General Partner in May 2007 and of AIMCO in April 2004.  Mr. Waters previously served as a Director of Real Estate Accounting since joining AIMCO in September 1999.  Mr. Waters has responsibility for partnership accounting with AIMCO and serves as the principal financial officer of the General Partner.



One or more of the above persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of such Act. Further, one or more of the above persons are also officers of Apartment Investment and Management Company and the general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15 (d) of such Act.



The board of directors of the General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Martha L. Long meets the requirement of an "audit committee financial expert".



The directors and officers of the General Partner with authority over the Partnership are all employees of subsidiaries of AIMCO. AIMCO has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on AIMCO's website (www.AIMCO.com). AIMCO's website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.



ITEM 10.

Executive Compensation



None of the directors and officers of the General Partner received any remuneration from the Partnership during the year ended December 31, 2007.



ITEM 11.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management



(a)

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners



The General Partner owns all of the outstanding general partnership interests of NTCP;  no person is known to own beneficially in excess of 5 percent of the outstanding Limited Partnership Interests.



(b)

None of the officers or directors of the General Partner own directly or beneficially any Limited Partnership Interests in NTCP.



ITEM 12.

Certain Relationships Related Transactions, and Director Independence



Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Agreement of the Limited Partnership, the Partnership is obligated to the General Partner for the following fees:



(a) An annual Partnership management fee in an amount equal to 0.5 percent of invested assets (as defined in the Partnership Agreement) as of the beginning of the year is payable to the General Partner.  For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately
$208,000 and $218,000, respectively, has been expensed.  At December 31, 2007, approximately $546,000 is owed to the General Partner and is included in accrued fees due to affiliates on the balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



(b) A property disposition fee is payable to the General Partner in an amount equal to the lesser of (i) one-half of the competitive real estate commission that would have been charged by unaffiliated third parties providing comparable services in the area where the apartment complex is located, or (ii) 3 percent of the sales price received in connection with the sale or disposition of the apartment complex or local partnership interest, but in no event will the property disposition fee and all amounts payable to unaffiliated real estate brokers in connection with any such sale exceed in the aggregate, the lesser of the competitive rate (as described above) or 6 percent of such sale price.  Receipt of the property disposition fee will be subordinated to the distribution of sale or refinancing proceeds by the Partnership until the limited partners have received distributions from sale or refinancing proceeds in an aggregate amount equal to (i) their 10 percent priority return for any year not theretofore satisfied (as defined in the partnership agreement) and (ii) an amount equal to the aggregate adjusted investment (as defined in the partnership agreement) of the limited partners.  No disposition fees have been paid.



(c) The Partnership reimburses NAPICO for certain expenses.  The reimbursement to NAPICO was approximately $49,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, and is included in general and administrative expenses. At December 31, 2007, approximately $136,000 is owed to NAPICO and is included in accrued fees due to affiliates on the balance sheet included in Item 7. Financial Statements.



As of December 31, 2007, the fees and advances due the General Partner exceeded the Partnerships cash. The General Partner has indicated that, during the forthcoming year, it will not demand payment of amounts due in excess of such cash, however, the Partnership still remains liable for all such amounts.



NTC, or another affiliate of the General Partner, is the Local Operating General Partner in six of the Partnership's twelve Local Partnerships.  In addition, NTC is either a special limited partner or an administrative general partner in each Local Partnership.



An affiliate of the General Partner managed one property owned by the Local Partnership during each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.  The Local Partnership pays the affiliate property management fees in the amount of 5 percent of their gross rental revenues.  The amounts paid were approximately $38,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.



AIMCO and its affiliates owned 437 limited partnership interests in the Partnership representing 1.84% of the outstanding interests at December 31, 2007. It is possible that AIMCO or its affiliates will acquire additional limited partnership interests in the Partnership in exchange for cash or a combination of cash and units in AIMCO Properties, L.P., the operating partnership of AIMCO, either through private purchases or tender offers. Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, unitholders holding a majority of the limited partnership interests are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters, that include, but are not limited to, voting on certain amendments to the Partnership Agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to the limited partners of the Partnership, the General Partner also owes fiduciary duties to AIMCO as its sole stockholder. As a result, the duties of the General Partner, as general partner, to the Partnership and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO as its sole stockholder.



Neither of the General Partners directors is independent under the independence standards established for New York Stock Exchange listed companies as both directors are employed by the parent of the General Partner.



ITEM 13.

Exhibits



See Exhibit Index.











ITEM 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services



The General Partner has reappointed Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors to audit the financial statements of the Partnership for 2008.  The aggregate fees billed for services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for 2007 and 2006 are described below.



Audit Fees.  Fees for audit services totaled approximately $37,000 and $45,000 for the years 2007 and 2006, respectively. Fees for audit services also include fees for the reviews of the Partnerships Quarterly Reports on Form 10-QSB.



Tax Fees.  Fees for tax services totaled approximately $21,000 for each of the years 2007 and 2006.











SIGNATURES





In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



| |                                             
| | --------------------------------------------
| | NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.           
| | (a California limited partnership)          
| |                                             
| | By:   NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP INVESTMENTS CORP.
| | General Partner                             
| |                                             
| | By:   /s/Martha L. Long                     
| | Martha L. Long                              
| | Senior Vice President                       
| |                                             
| | By:   /s/Stephen B. Waters                  
| | Stephen B. Waters                           
| | Vice President                              
| |                                             
| | Date: April 14, 2008                        



In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                      |                        |                      
|--------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------
|/s/David R. Robertson | Director and President | Date:  April 14, 2008
|David R. Robertson    |                        |                      
|                      |                        |                      
|/s/Harry G. Alcock    | Director and Executive | Date:  April 14, 2008
|Harry G. Alcock       | Vice President         |                      
|                      |                        |                      
|/s/Martha L. Long     | Senior Vice President  | Date:  April 14, 2008
|Martha L. Long        |                        |                      
|                      |                        |                      
|/s/Stephen B. Waters  | Vice President         | Date:  April 14, 2008
|Stephen B. Waters     |                        |                      











NATIONAL TAX CREDIT PARTNERS, L.P.

EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit

Description of Exhibit





3

Partnership Agreement (herein incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Form S-11 Registration No. 33-27658).



10.3

Form of 2006 Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership of Vinton/Park School Apartments Limited Partnership between National Tax Credit Partners, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, National Tax Credit, Inc., a California corporation, DES Properties, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company, and Roseland Redevelopment Corporation, a Nebraska corporation, incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2006.



31.1

Certification of equivalent of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



31.2

Certification of equivalent of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



32.1

Certification of the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.