alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STA1E OF MONTANA

DA 20-0399

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLARD McCAULOU,

Defendant and Appellant.

FILED

AUG 1 8 2020

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

--or Alin ntans

ORDER

Through counsel, Defendant Willard McCaulou filed a notice of appeal in this

criminal matter on August 10, 2020. Counsel filed the same day a motion to withdraw,

representing that McCaulou is claiming he was ineffective at trial and "does not want

Carl Jensen to represent him on appeal." The motion represents further that McCaulou is

incarcerated, indigent, and asks the Court to appoint the Appellate Defender Division to

represent him in this appeal. McCaulou is entitled to the appointment of counsel for his

direct appeal. Section 46-8-104(1)(d), MCA. Good cause appearing,

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Carl Jensen's Motion to Withdraw as counsel of

record is GRANTED. The Appellate Defender Division shall have thirty days from the date

of this Order within which either to file a Notice of Appearance or a Motion to Rescind this

Order appointing counsel. In the event McCaulou qualifies for appointed counsel, the

Appellate Defender Division shall immediately order the appropriate transcripts ifthey have

not been already ordered.

The Clerk of the Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy of this Order to

Carl B. Jensen Jr., to the Appellate Defender Division, and to the Attorney General.

DATED this I r ay of August, 2020.

Chief Justice

08/19/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0399
(7 ''(' A./J., 

?1.1.".n% Justices

• i\?

e ec__.
#### STATE ex rel. Sam BALL, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-1071.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Ball, Sam Jr.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 311-835.

Denied. No particularized need shown.
#### Harry Sears LOVETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Nov. 23, 1988.

C. John Coniglio, Wildwood, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ON REHEARING EN BANC

PER CURIAM.

The opinion previously issued herein is VACATED and the judgment appealed from is

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER, COBB and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., dissent without opinion.
Document

Exhibit 10.2


CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY


Non-Employee Director Compensation for Calendar 2021


Board and Committee Retainer for Calendar 2021


$119,000 shall be paid in cash
$144,500 shall be paid in shares of Campbell stock


Additional Retainers for Board Chair, Committee Chairs and Audit Committee Members


In addition to the above Board and Committee retainer, the following amounts shall be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of Campbell stock:


						
	$350,000
	Chair of the Board

	$25,000
	Audit Committee chair

	$20,000
	Compensation and Organization Committee chair

	$15,000
	Finance Committee chair

	$15,000
	Governance Committee chair

	$7,500
	Audit Committee members (excluding the Audit Committee chair)













The retainers will be paid quarterly in arrears. Prior to the beginning of a calendar year, a non-employee director may elect to (i) receive shares of Campbell stock in lieu of the cash portion of any retainer (such election to be made in 10% increments) and/or (ii) defer all or a portion of any cash or stock retainer in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Campbell Soup Company Supplemental Retirement Plan.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert BOYER.

No. 87-KK-0722.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-7005; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 306971.

Denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Burkett, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J., at *Mapp*hearing, plea and sentence), rendered July 20, 1989, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

A New York City police officer using binoculars, from an *210observation post in an abandoned building, observed defendant sell what appeared to be marijuana, which was kept in a small, black "doctor’s bag” to another individual. A short while later, defendant was seen emerging from a nearby building carrying the same "doctor’s bag”. After defendant entered a livery cab, a police officer approached the cab, ordered defendant to step out, and placed defendant under arrest. A subsequent search of the doctor’s bag revealed that it contained a quantity of both marijuana and cocaine.

There was no constitutional impediment, either State or Federal, to the search of the "doctor’s bag”, which had been previously linked to the narcotics sale *(People v Villalvir,*160 AD2d 627, *lv denied*76 NY2d 867). "[W]hen the circumstances giving rise to probable cause to arrest a driver or passenger in the automobile also support the belief that the automobile contains contraband related to the crime for which the arrest is made, police may search, within a reasonable time after the arrest, any container, locked or otherwise, located in the automobile.” *(People v Langen,*60 NY2d 170, 172, *cert denied*465 US 1028.) We find no basis to disturb the factual findings on the suppression counts. Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Opinion issued November 21, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00073-CV

———————————

RAYMOND BOOKER, Appellant

V.

OSCAR GUERRERO, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1060392

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Raymond Booker, has failed to timely file his appellate brief. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d), 38.8(a)(1). Further, appellant has neither paid the 

required filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See id.

5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a), 
2

101.041(1) (West 2015); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases 

in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified by this Court’s 

June 8, 2017 Order and Notice of Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution that this 

appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to pay the required fee, and by Clerk’s 

July 25, 2017 notice that this appeal was subject to dismissal for failure to file the 

appellant’s brief, appellant failed to timely respond. See id. 5, 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 

(c).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to 

timely file a brief and for failure to pay all required fees. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Bland.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 144

Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the first meeting of Congress in

Washington, DC.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 200th anniversary of the first meeting

of Congress in Washington, DC.

Whereas November 17, 2000, is the 200th anniversary of the

first meeting of Congress in Washington, DC;

Whereas Congress, having previously convened at the Federal

Hall in New York City and at the Congress Hall in

Philadelphia, has met in the United States Capitol Building since November 17, 1800;

Whereas President John Adams, on November 22, 1800, addressed a joint session of Congress in Washington, DC,

for the first time, stating, ‘‘I congratulate the people of

the United States on the assembling of Congress at the

permanent seat of their Government; and I congratulate

you, gentlemen, on the prospect of a residence not to be

changed.’’;
2

•SCON 144 ATS

Whereas, on December 12, 1900, Congress convened a joint

meeting to observe the centennial of its residence in

Washington, DC;

Whereas since its first meeting in Washington, DC, on November 17, 1800, Congress has continued to cultivate

and build upon a heritage of respect for individual liberty, representative government, and the attainment of

equal and inalienable rights, all of which are symbolized

in the physical structure of the United States Capitol

Building; and

Whereas it is appropriate for Congress, as the first branch

of the government under the Constitution, to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the first meeting of Congress in Washington, DC, in order to focus public attention on its present duties and responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) November 17, 2000, be designated as a day of

4 national observance for the 200th anniversary of the first

5 meeting of Congress in Washington, DC; and

6 (2) the people of the United States be urged and in7 vited to observe such date by celebrating and examining

8 the legislative process by which members of Congress con9 vene and air differences, learn from one another, subordi10 nate parochial interests, compromise, and work towards
3

•SCON 144 ATS

1 achieving a constructive consensus for the good of the peo2 ple of the United States.

Æ
** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Steven D. Hunt, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

     5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 10, 2007
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-18-00080-CR

JUDDSON MALONEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1524589

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 10, 2018, Juddson Maloney was adjudicated guilty of the offense of indecency 

with a child by sexual contact and was sentenced to thirteen years’ incarceration. On May 9, 2018, 

Maloney timely filed his notice of appeal from the April 10 judgment. The trial court’s 

certification of defendant’s right of appeal, however, indicates that Maloney has waived his right 

of appeal. That certification is supported by an express, written waiver of Maloney’s right of 

appeal. 

Pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court must 

dismiss an appeal if, as in this case, the trial court’s certification indicates that there is no right of 

appeal or that the right of appeal has been waived. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

By letter dated June 13, 2018, we notified Maloney of this potential defect in our 

jurisdiction and afforded him the opportunity to respond. Maloney did not respond to our 

jurisdictional defect letter.

Because the trial court certified that Maloney has no right of appeal due to waiver, and 

because that certification is supported by Maloney’s express, written waiver of his right of appeal, 

Maloney has no right of appeal. 

Consequently, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: July 5, 2018

Date Decided: July 6, 2018

Do Not Publish
AARON FRANKLIN BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

NORTH FLORIDA SURGEONS, P. A. AND G. STEVEN WEBB, M.D.,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THE REOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D12

- 3383

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 28, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Jean M. Johnson, Judge.

Robert F. Jordan of Jordan Law Firm, PLLC, Lake City, for Appellant.

James T. Murp hy and Jill F. Bechtold of Murphy , Ellis & Weldon, PLLC

, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

In Brown v. North Florida Surgeons, P.A.

, 110 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 1st DCA

2013), we affirmed the trial court’s ord er compelling arbitration. Appellantpetitioned the Florida Supreme Court for review, and by order dated June 9, 2014,

the Court quashed our decision and remanded for reconsideration upon application

of Franks v. Bowers , 116 So. 3d 1240 (Fla. 2013)

. We d irected the parties to show

cause why the trial court’s order should not be reversed based upon Franks

. The

parties agree that reversal is required because the agreement containing the

arbitration clause at issue in this case is the same agreement that wa s invalidated in

Franks . Accordingly, the trial court’s order compelling arbitration is reversed and

this case is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 10

Providing for the reappointment of Barber B. Conable, Jr. as a citizen

regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. FRIST) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the reappointment of Barber B. Conable, Jr.

as a citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Barber B. Conable,
2

•SJ 10 IS

1 Jr. of New York, is filled by reappointment of the incum2 bent for a term of 6 years, effective April 12, 1999.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. James R. REGALLIS v. The OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, THIRTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF VERNON.

No. 88-KH-1009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Regallis, James R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Vernon, 30th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 31341, 31342.

Denied.
P.1 

OAR Box 1867 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

43) ll-B-97 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/2/2008 6:27:21 AM Sheet 43 of 95 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-B-97 

PENDING CONFIDENTIAL 

The following information is located in the confidential 

files of the Director, Emission Standards Division, Office of Air 

Quality Planning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711. This 

information is confidential pending final determination by the 

Administrator and is not available for public inspection. 

W. Floyd, Radian Corporation, to Process Vents Docket 

A-90-19, January 1991, HON NESHAP: Industry 

Characteristics/Neopentanoic Acid. 21 pages. 

CBI Document Control No. 86/23, PPS-97
# National Poison Prevention Week, 2012

Unintentional drug overdose, exposure to harmful chemicals, and other types of accidental poisoning claim thousands of lives every year. On the 50th anniversary of National Poison Prevention Week, I encourage all Americans to help protect their loved ones by identifying poisoning hazards at home; using, storing, and disposing of medication safely and effectively; and learning more about how to prevent and respond to poison emergencies.

Though we have dramatically reduced the incidence of poisoning among children, accidental exposure to drugs and medicines, typical household chemicals, and other dangerous substances continues to threaten the health of our Nation’s youth—particularly those under the age of six. Parents and caregivers can help prevent poisoning by storing chemicals and medication in locked or childproof cabinets beyond their children’s reach, and by safely disposing of unused or expired prescription drugs. To find more information and safety tips, visit:  www.CDC.gov.

Tragically, the mortality rate from unintentional drug overdose climbs higher every year. Misuse and abuse of prescription painkillers among teens and adults drives this trend. As we work to address this serious public health issue, we must do more to educate parents, young people, patients, and prescribers about the dangers of prescription drug abuse and the steps they can take to prevent it. Because the majority of individuals who abuse prescription pain relievers obtain them from friends or family, all of us can take action by using medications only as directed by a health care provider and removing old or unneeded medications from our homes. Additional resources on safe drug disposal are available at www.FDA.gov and www.DEAdiversion.USDOJ.gov.

In the event of an accidental poisoning, rapid response can make all the difference. The national poison help hotline is available to respond to poison emergencies and provide essential information 24 hours a day, seven days a week at 1-800-222-1222.

To encourage Americans to learn more about the dangers of accidental poisonings and to take appropriate preventive measures, the Congress, by joint resolution approved September 26, 1961, as amended (75 Stat. 681), has authorized and requested the President to issue a proclamation designating the third week of March each year as “National Poison Prevention Week.”

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim March 18 through March 24, 2012, as National Poison Prevention Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this week by taking actions to protect their families from hazardous household materials and from misuse of prescription medications.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-sixth.

[FR Doc. 2012-6990

Billing code 3295-F2-P