alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer


of


Boardwalk
GP, LLC


pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned chief executive officer of Boardwalk GP, LLC hereby certifies, to
such officer’s knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2008, (the "Report") of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP (the
“Partnership”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.





October
28, 2008


/s/ Rolf A.
Gafvert


Rolf A.
Gafvert


President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal
Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





I,
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby
certify that:





(1)  I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Rotoblock Corporation;





(2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





(4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and





(5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated: September
13,
2008 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION





/s/
Richard Di Stefano


By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 10.3

LOGO

February 2, 2011

Repsol YPF

Paseo de La Castellana, 278-280

28046 Madrid

España

Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Ryder Scott Company, L.P. consents to the references to our firm
included in Repsol YPF, S.A.s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to the inclusion of our report dated March 24, 2010, as an exhibit to Repsol YPF, S.A.s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the
year ended December 31, 2009.



Very truly yours,RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580/s/ Herman G. AcuñaHerman G. Acuña, P.E.Texas P.E. License No. 92254Managing Senior Vice PresidentInternationalLOGO


HGA



| |  |                                                                                     |  |                    |  | 
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | 
| |  | 600,    1015    4TH STREET, S.W. CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4        TEL (403) 262-2799 |  | FAX (403) 262-2790 |  | 
| |  | 621    17TH STREET, SUITE 1550 DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501 TEL (303) 623-9147       |  | FAX (303) 623-4258 |  |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

s1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

146135

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146135

COA: 305964

Kent CC: 11-001091-FH

EDWARD ALLAN PROCTOR,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William FONTANILLE.

No. 87-KK-0382.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of review and supervisory writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 86-1300; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-K-10.

Granted. The State has one hundred twenty days within which to conduct a second trial, dating from January 5, 1987, the date upon which defendant reurged his mo*120tion for a speedy trial; subject to any future delay for just cause established by contradictory hearing. La.C.Cr.P. article 701. The article 582 time period is inapplicable when the right to a speedy trial has been invoked by the defendant.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification**

I, John Fitzpatrick, certifythat:

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of WII Components, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge,the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.             Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.             Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.             All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.             Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| **Date: August 10, 2007** | ** ** | ** **                            |
|---------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|
|                      |       | /s/ John Fitzpatrick                  |   |
|                      |       | John Fitzpatrick                      |
|                      |       | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
** **

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended May 27, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Hunt, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 10, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 29, 2012 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 29, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

An adjudicatory matter; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: March 22, 2012.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7385 Filed 3-23-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      quarterly report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.




Date:
      May
      15, 2008




By:
            /s/
                Peter H. EngelPeter
                H. EngelChairman
                and CEO(Principal
                executive officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Journal officiel C 296A/3 ao

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 296A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 65e année3 août 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 296A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

65e année3 août 2022

---

| Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Entreprise commune Énérgie de fusion |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Avis modifiant l’avis de l’entreprise commune européenne pour ITER et le développement de l’énergie de fusion (F4E) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur/directrice (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20086 ( JO C 285 A du 26.7.2022 ) | 1 |

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Entreprise commune Énérgie de fusion

2022/C 296 A/01

Avis modifiant l’avis de l’entreprise commune européenne pour ITER et le développement de l’énergie de fusion (F4E) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur/directrice (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20086 ( JO C 285 A du 26.7.2022 )

( JO C 285 A du 26.7.2022 )

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Entreprise commune Énérgie de fusion

| 3.8.2022 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 296/1

---

Avis modifiant l’avis de l’entreprise commune européenne pour ITER et le développement de l’énergie de fusion (F4E) — Publication d’un avis de vacance pour le poste de directeur/directrice (Agent temporaire — Grade AD 14) — COM/2022/20086

(
  «Journal officiel de l’Union européenne» C 285 A du 26 juillet 2022
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

Page 5, au titre «Conditions d’emploi», sixième paragraphe:

| au lieu de: | «Le poste sera vacant à partir du 1er janvier 2024.», |
| --- | --- |

au lieu de:

«Le poste sera vacant à partir du 1er janvier 2024.»,

| lire: | «Le poste sera vacant à partir du 1er janvier 2023.». |
| --- | --- |

lire:

lire:

«Le poste sera vacant à partir du 1er janvier 2023.».

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Matter of the Marriage of Sheila 

Diane Fisher and Darrell Wayne Fisher

No. 06-20-00101-CV

Appeal from the 429th District Court of 

Collin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 429-

00005-2019). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that each party bear its own costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 6, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, StevenTanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Steven Tanner       |             |
|-------------------------|------------------|
| Steven Tanner           |
|                    |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
|                    | November 6, 2006 |   |
|                         |                  |  |  |

 

----
SkyPhilly, Inc.

Request for amendments to FAA 333 UAS exemption

Exemption No. 11256

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0908

Contact:

Paul Caskey

VP Technology 

SkyPhilly, Inc.

215.680.2808

www.SkyPhilly.com

To whom it may concern:
Date: May 5, 2015

Re: Exemption No. 11256

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0908

SkyPhilly is requesting amendments to their existing 333 exemption as listed and described below. 

The purpose for the amendments is to be able to offer the services as listed in the existing 333 

exemption. Each amendment will serve to increase the functionality and usefulness of UASs and the 

increased functionality will serve to create safer working environments in the industries in which they 

are deployed.

1. Additional Aircraft

SkyPhilly would like to add an additional UAS to the existing exemption. The new craft is a quadrotor 

designed in-house using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. 

Manufacturer: SkyPhilly

Model No.: M1, 

By using a collection of best-in-class components, SkyPhilly was able to construct a very reliable 

vehicle, with additional features and longer air time than the DJI S-900 listed on the 333 exemption. 

The M1 meets all weight, speed and other criteria spelled out in the 333 exemption.

The M1 UAS was designed primarily for agricultural applications. The proprietary pilot operating 

handbook (POH) will be emailed directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov.

2. Relief from restriction #2 for filming in closed set movie or television production

SkyPhilly has extensive video and film production experience and would like to be able to use UASs 

for such purposes as called out in the 333 exemption. It is therefore requesting relief from restriction 

#2 on the 333 exemption for operation in closed set environments for movie and television production.

SkyPhilly’s proprietary Motion Picture and Television Flight Operations for Unmanned Aerial Systems 

will be mailed directly directly to 333exemptions@faa.gov.

3. Relief from restriction #15 prohibiting night flight.

SkyPhilly would like the ability to perform roof inspections on large commercial buildings with flat 

roofs. In warmer seasons/climates, spots of a roof that are leaking have collected water that retains

the day’s heat for a few hours longer than the rest of the roof that has not been compromised. The 

traditional method for locating leaks, or wet spots on large flat roofs is to use a handheld thermal 

imaging camera shortly after nightfall and have the technician walk the roof to identify leaks. While 

many safety features are in place, every year, several people become distracted and accidentally 

walk off an edge in the dark resulting in serious injury or death.

This is a very dangerous job that commercial roofing companies would like to make much safer and 

even save lives by using UASs. Since the thermal imaging needs to be done shortly after sunset, and 

after several hours does not yield results, SkyPhilly is requesting only partial relief from limitation #15 

and seeking permission to operate up to 4 hours after sunset. SkyPhilly will still maintain visual flight 

rules and only fly under VFR conditions.