alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2374 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2374

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microwave oven and range 
                           hood combinations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Voinovich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microwave oven and range 
                           hood combinations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MICROWAVE OVEN AND RANGE HOOD COMBINATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Microwave oven and  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          range hood                                                         31/2011.......
                          combinations with
                          oven capacity
                          exceeding 45.0
                          liters (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8516.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 117

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the United States share of

any reconstruction measures undertaken in the Balkans region of Europe

on account of the armed conflict and atrocities that have occurred in

the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia since March 24, 1999.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the United

States share of any reconstruction measures undertaken

in the Balkans region of Europe on account of the armed

conflict and atrocities that have occurred in the Federal

Republic of Yugoslavia since March 24, 1999.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF SENATE ON UNITED STATES SHARE

3 OF RECONSTRUCTION COSTS.

4 It is the sense of the Senate that the United States

5 share of the total costs of reconstruction measures carried

6 out in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia or contiguous

7 countries, on account of the armed conflict and atrocities
2

•SRES 117 IS

1 that have occurred in the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

2 since March 24, 1999, should not exceed the United

3 States percentage share of the common-funded budgets of

4 NATO.

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

6 In this resolution:

7 (1) COMMON-FUNDED BUDGETS OF NATO.—

8 The term ‘‘common-funded budgets of NATO’’

9 means—

10 (A) the Military Budget, the Security In11 vestment Program, and the Civil Budget of

12 NATO; and

13 (B) any successor or additional account or

14 program of NATO.

15 (2) FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA.—The

16 term ‘‘Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’’ means the

17 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Monte18 negro) and includes Kosovo.

19 (3) UNITED STATES PERCENTAGE SHARE OF

20 THE COMMON-FUNDED BUDGETS OF NATO.—The

21 term ‘‘United States percentage share of the com22 mon-funded budgets of NATO’’ means the percent23 age that the total of all United States payments dur24 ing a fiscal year to the common-funded budgets of

25 NATO represent to the total amounts payable by all
3

•SRES 117 IS

1 NATO members to those budgets during that fiscal

2 year.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 141 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.141
                                      Agreed to October 24, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That (a) a revised edition of the publication entitled ``The United 
States Capitol'' (referred to as ``the pamphlet'') shall be reprinted 
as a Senate document.
    (b) There shall be printed a total of 2,850,000 copies of the 
pamphlet in English and seven other languages at a cost not to exceed 
$165,900 for distribution as follows:
        (1)(A) 206,000 copies of the pamphlet in the English language 
    for the use of the Senate with 2,000 copies distributed to each 
    Member;
        (B) 886,000 copies of the pamphlet in the English language for 
    the use of the House of Representatives with 2,000 copies 
    distributed to each Member; and
        (C) 1,758,000 copies of the pamphlet for distribution to the 
    Capitol Guide Service in the following languages:
            (i) 908,000 copies in English;
            (ii) 100,000 copies in each of the following seven 
        languages: Spanish, German, French, Russian, Japanese, Italian, 
        and Korean; and
            (iii) 150,000 copies in Chinese.
        (2) If the total printing and production costs of copies in 
    paragraph (1) exceed $165,900, such number of copies of the 
    pamphlet as does not exceed total printing and production costs of 
    $165,900, shall be printed with distribution to be allocated in the 
    same proportion as in paragraph (1) as it relates to numbers of 
    copies in the English language.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
50117.

#### MANNESS v. THE STATE.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The defendant contended in his unsworn statement that, when he went to the victim’s apartment, it was only to remonstrate about the treatment he claimed was given one of his children, and that he happened to have a pistol in his hand only by chance and did not realize he was carrying it, and that the victim advanced against him and that he then retreated. "When I backed up I was under the steps, I couldn’t go nowhere. I threw my hands up, the gun went off, and Buddy staggered back.” This statement was contradicted by three witnesses who testified that the defendant in fact entered the victim’s apartment, cursed and threatened him, and eventually shot him in the throat. *Held:*

1. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are without merit.

2. Where one of the defenses urged is supported only by the defendant’s unsworn statement, and there is no request to instruct the jury on the law of such defense, *112failure to so charge is not reversible error. *Huff v. State,*113 Ga. App. 257 (147 SE2d 840); *Ivey v. State,*118 Ga. App. 406 (163 SE2d 843); *Washington v. State,*126 Ga. App. 396 (190 SE2d 821); *Whisman v. State,*221 Ga. 460 (145 SE2d *499); Brawner v. State,*221 Ga. 680 (146 SE2d 737); *Stevens v. State,*228 Ga. 621 (187 SE2d 281).

Submitted January 14, 1975

Decided February 3, 1975

Rehearing denied February 25,1975

*Downey, Cleveland & Moore, John H. Moore,*for appellant.

*George W. Darden, District Attorney, B. Wayne Phillips,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.*

On Motion for Rehearing.

We are urged by motion to rehear to follow the law as stated in *Foskey v. State,*125 Ga. App. 672 (3) (188 SE2d 825) that the court "must charge the law of the case so as to cover the substantial issues made by the evidence, whether such instructions are requested or not.” This is correct; in the present case, however, the affirmative defense was not raised by *evidence*but only by the unsworn statement. Counsel for the appellant did not try the case but is the third in succession of court-appointed counsel. This defendant has had a fair trial in every respect, and we adhere to our decision affirming the conviction.

*Judgment adhered to.*
Home | About | Getting Started

Search Home › Code Status › Code Status 

# Code Status

The Building Codes Assistance Project (BCAP) has cr eated a series of maps to provide a national snapshot of building energy code adoption and implementation status, as well as international adoption status. Click on a map to learn more about the status of en ergy codes in each state and country. BCAP makes every effort to ensure that the maps are accurate and up-to-date. If you have any questions or comments about the maps, please contact us . Also be sure to check out our State Fact Sheets for a summary of energy code activities and opport unities in each state. Other BCAP Code Status Maps 

### Energy Policy Act (EPAct) Compliance - Commercial Energy Policy Act (EPAct) Compliance - Residential International Code Status - Non-Residential International Code Status - Residential 

### User Login Username: * Password: *
Create new account Request new password 

# Page 1 of 2 Code Status | Online Code Environment and Advocacy Network

5/29/2014 http://energycodesocean.org/code - status	
	Building Codes Assistance Project Contact Us | RSS Feed | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Credits Attachment Size Code_Status_Home_Image-Apr14.jpg 73.86 KB 

# Page 2 of 2 Code Status | Online Code Environment and Advocacy Network

5/29/2014 http://energycodesocean.org/code - status
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                     LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                     JURISDICTION OF    OTHER NAMES UNDER WHICH
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                    INCORPORATION     SUBSIDIARY DOES BUSINESS
------------------                   ---------------    ------------------------
<S>                                  <C>                <C>
Scotsman Group Inc.                  Delaware           Scotsman
                                                        Scotsman Commercial Ice
                                                         Systems, Inc.
                                                        Scotsman Ice Systems
                                                        Scotsman of Los Angeles

Booth, Inc.                          Texas              Crystal Tips

Castel MAC, S.p.A.                   Italy              None

DFC Holding Corporation              Delaware           None

The Delfield Company                 Delaware           None

Hartek Awagem Vertriebsges m.b.H.    Austria            None

Hartek Beverage Handling GmbH        Germany            None

Frimont, S.p.A.                      Italy              None

Scotsman Drink Equipment Limited     England            None

Whitlenge Acquisition Limited        England            None

Whitlenge Drink Equipment Limited    England            None

Whitlenge Drink Equipment, N.V.      Belgium            None
</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44033

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JAMES JOSEPH O’BRIEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 779

Filed: November 16, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Latah County. Hon. John R. Stegner, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of four years, with a minimum period of 

confinement of one year, for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, 

affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth A. 

Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

James J. O’Brien was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance, 

methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(1). The district court imposed a unified four-year 

sentence, with one year determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed O’Brien on probation. 

O’Brien appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, O’Brien’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 45 ) IV-E-3 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20089:15:28AM

Sheet 45of 105P. 2 

# RADIA N 

# A-83-2 7 CORPORATIO N IV-E-3 3 TELEPHON E CAL L REPOR T - INDUSTRIA L BOILER : S0 2 ADDITIONA L ANALYSE S DATE : Apri l 7 , 198 7 TO : Ji m

Coulthar d Rile yStoke r Corporatio n Pos t Offic e Bo x54 7 Worcester , MA0161 3 (617 ) 852-710 0 FROM : J.A . Elliot t SUBJECT : Informatio no n Rile yStoke r FB C Uni t a t th e Universit yo f

Missour i Mr . Coulthar d provide dth e followin g information : o Universit yo f Missour i (Columbia , MO )

- On e uni t a t 200,00 0 pp h,

- Projecte d t o star t u p i n Septembe r 198 7

- Circulatin g be d

- Wil l bur nbituminou s coa l wit h4 % sulfu r conten t

- Designe dfo r 83 % S0 « remova l

- Desig nCa/ S rati o i s abou t 1. 5 t o 2. 0

- Subjec t t o 1. 2 l bS0 2 /MMBt u emissio nlimi t

Progres s Center/320 0 E . Chape l Hil l Rd./Nelso n Hwy./P.O . Bo x13000/Researc h Triangl e Park . N.C . 27709/(919)541-910 0P. 3 

# Rikl Y RILE YSTOKE R

CORPORATIO N POSTOFFIC E BO X$tr* 204 0 WORCESTER . MASSACHUSETT S 01613-204 0 C617 5 852-710 0 TELE X92042 6 Jul y14 , 198 ? J . Thoma s Waddel l Radia nCorporatio n Progres s Cente r 320 0 E . Chape l Hil l Rd./Nelso nHwy . P.O . Bo x1300 0 Researc hTriangl e Park , N C 2770 9 RE : You r lette r o f Jun e 29 , 198 7 Dea r Mr . Waddell : Pleas e find enclose dcopie s o f th e telephon e cal l report s tha t yo u sen t t o me . Th e informatio npertainin g t o ou r Universit yo f Missour i contrac t i s confirme d a s bein g correct . I hav e annotate d th e informatio npertainin g t o ou r Genera l Motor s contrac t t o brin g i t u p t o dat e and provid e missin g data . Pleas e contac t m e shoul d yo u nee d anyfurthe r information .



# - j : c^JJtL^i Sincerely , RILE YSTOKE RCORPORATION Ji mCoulthar d JC/ka j Enclosure s

An Ashland

Technology

Company
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                      AMENDMENT TO PLANS OF REORGANIZATION
                   AND EXCHANGE AND ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENTS

     The undersigned, signatories to those certain plans of reorganization and
exchange and asset purchase agreements (collectively, the "Agreements"), by and
among Zeros & Ones, Inc. (formerly Commercial Labor Management, Inc.), a Nevada
corporation (the "Corporation"), Zeros & Ones, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Quantum Arts, Inc., a California corporation, Kidvision, Inc., a California
corporation, Wood Ranch Technology Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, EKO
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, Polygonal Research Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, and Pillar West Entertainment, Inc., a California corporation,
dated as of July 1, 1999, hereby agree to amend the Agreements on March 30,
2000, to be effective as of July 1, 1999, as follows:

     1.   The number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock issued to
          Robert Holtz, the sole shareholder of Zeros & Ones, Inc., a Delaware
          corporation, in consideration for 100% of the assets of Zeros & Ones,
          Inc., a Delaware corporation, is 220,000 rather than 512,000.

     2.   The number of shares of the Corporation's Common Stock issued to
          Robert Holtz, the owner of 98.3% of the total issued and outstanding
          stock of EKO Corporation, a Delaware corporation, in consideration for
          98.3% of the assets of EKO Corporation, is 297,000 to Robert Holtz
          rather than 5,000.

     3.   The Agreements will remain in full force and effect without
          modification except as amended by this Amendment to Plans of
          Reorganization and Exchange and Asset Purchase Agreements

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby execute this Amendment to Plans
of Reorganization and Exchange and Asset Purchase Agreements in their same
capacity as they executed the original Agreements .


                                        /s/ Robert Holtz
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Robert Holtz


                                        /s/ Steve Schklair
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Steve Schklair


                                        /s/ Mark J. Richardson
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Mark J. Richardson


                                        /s/ Edward L. Torres
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Edward L. Torres
<PAGE>
 
                                                                DQE Exhibit 23.1
 

                         Independent Auditors' Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-60966 of DQE on Form S-3, Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration
Statement No. 33-29147 of DQE on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos. 33-66488
and 33-72582 of DQE on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-46773 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration
Statement No. 33-87974 of DQE on Form S-8 of our report dated January 28, 1997,
appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
DQE for the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 28, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 30 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 30

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for women and men.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1999

 Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Robb, Mr. Akaka, 
Mrs. Murray, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Kerry, and Ms. 
Snowe) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
              relative to equal rights for women and men.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied 
or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
    ``Section 2. Congress shall have the power to enforce this article 
by appropriate legislation.
    ``Section 3. This article shall take effect two years after the 
date of ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 41

Providing for the appointment of Sheila E. Widnall as a citizen regent

of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 29, 2000

Mr. COCHRAN (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, and Mr. FRIST) introduced the

following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Sheila E. Widnall as a

citizen regent of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, in accordance with section 5581 of the Revised Stat4 utes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on

5 the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in

6 the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by

7 reason of the expiration of the term of Frank A. Shrontz

8 of Washington on May 4, 2000, is filled by the appoint9 ment of Sheila E. Widnall of Massachusetts. The appoint-
2

•SJ 41 IS

1 ment is for a term of 6 years and shall take effect on

2 May 5, 2000.

Æ