alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 32

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         The undersigned, Ralph E. Bailey and Vincent J. Arnone, do each hereby
certify with respect to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clean Diesel
Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Date: March 15, 2004   By: /s/ Ralph E. Bailey
                           -------------------
                           Ralph E. Bailey
                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 15, 2004   By: /s/ Vincent J. Arnone
                           ---------------------
                           Vincent J. Arnone
                           Vice President, Treasurer and
                           Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") this
certification accompanies the Report and shall not, except to the extent
required by the Act, be deemed filed by Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of
the Exchange Act.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2005 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 182 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 182

    Designating October 1999 as ``National Stamp Collecting Month''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 1999

    Mr. Levin (for himself and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            October 1, 1999

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Designating October 1999 as ``National Stamp Collecting Month''.

Whereas over 150 years ago, United States commemorative stamps began honoring 
        the people, places, and events that have shaped our Nation's history;
Whereas in 1999, more than 22,000,000 Americans, including children, collect and 
        learn about our Nation through stamps, making stamp collecting one of 
        the most popular hobbies in our Nation and the world;
Whereas as we stand on the threshold of the 21st century, it is important that 
        we pause to reflect on our Nation's history;
Whereas stamps honor statesmen and soldiers who fought for freedom and 
        democracy, recognize our Nation's scientific and technological 
        achievements, pay tribute to our Nation's artistic legacy, and celebrate 
        the strength of our Nation's diversity;
Whereas starting October 1, 1999, ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' will 
        transform more than 100,000 schools, libraries, and post offices into 
        learning centers where our Nation's young people can honor the past and 
        celebrate the future through stamps;
Whereas the founders and participants of ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' 
        include millions of adult and youth collectors, thousands of teachers 
        and schools, the American Philatelic Society, and the United States 
        Postal Service;
Whereas the people, places, and events shaping America today will be United 
        States commemorative stamps tomorrow;
Whereas ``National Stamp Collecting Month'' will help empower our Nation's 
        children and future generations to study and learn from our Nation's 
        history; and
Whereas as our Nation's children learn the lessons of the past, the children 
        will be better prepared to guide our Nation in the future: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate designates October 1999 as ``National 
Stamp Collecting Month''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,126
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          82,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                  58,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         12,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,250
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,768
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,591
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,652
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)
        

</TABLE>
Not for P ublication in West's Fe deral Reporter



# United State s Court of Appeals

For the F irst Circuit

No. 11-2214 JOHN WHITNEY, Petitioner, Appellant,

v. LUIS SPENCER, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Mark L. Wolf, U.S. District Judge]

Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges. Joseph F. Krowski for appellant. Amy L . Karangekis, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Martha Coakley, A t torney General of Massachusetts, was on brief, for appellee. August 30, 2012
#### Vincent A. IMPASTATO v. Shirley Stumpf IMPASTATO.

No. 89-C-0095.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Impastato, Vincent A.;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0851; Parish of *1173Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 296-498.

Denied.
#### In the Matter of James J. Lennox et al., Petitioners, against Joseph A. McNamara et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 7, 1949.

*10
      *McDermott & McDermott (John G. McDermott*of counsel), for petitioners.

*John P.*McGrath, *Corporation Counsel (Frank H. Crabtree*of counsel), for respondents.

*Paul Windels*for John J. Behan, intervenor.

*George Blumenthal*for intervenor-respondent.

*Benedict D. Dineen,*J.

The present proceeding was instituted on February 1, 1949 and the determination to be reviewed was published in the *City Record*on August 8, 1947. The subject of review concerns the final key answers given by the respondents to Questions 19 and 27 of the promotion examination from patrolman to sergeant in the Police Department of the City of New York.

Section 1286 of the Civil Practice Act states: “ a proceeding under this article to review a determination or to compel performance of a duty specifically enjoined by law, must be instituted * * * within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding ”.

The determination with reference to the final key answers to Questions 19 and 27 became effective on August 8, 1947. This determination was final and binding upon petitioners. It is apparent, therefore, that such proceeding was not instituted within the prescribed period of time. Since petitioners are barred from maintaining this proceeding, it is not necessary to pass upon any of the other questions raised.

Motion to amend title is granted. The petition is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Utilicraft  Aerospace
Industries,  Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Dupont, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: May 20, 2008                                  /s/ John Dupont
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        John Dupont
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.0

                            CORD BLOOD AMERICA, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of Cord Blood America, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), of
the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:   August 22, 2005


/s/Matthew L. Schissler
-----------------------
Matthew L. Schissler
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
#### Michael Anthony ROTZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-460.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 10, 1988.

*356James Dickson Crock, Daytona Beach for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DANIEL, Judge.

Michael Anthony Rotz appeals a judgment and sentence for burglary of a structure. Rotz contends that the sentence is illegal because it was partially based on an improperly scored prior Indiana conviction. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(5)(a)(2) requires assignment of the score for the Florida statute analogous to that out-of-state conviction. However, it is not clear from the record under which Indiana statute the defendant was convicted. Thus, we must remand for resentenc-ing for either substantiation of the appropriate Indiana statute1 to be analogized to Florida law or rescoring as a third rather than second degree felony to give the defendant the benefit of the doubt. *See Armontrout v. State,*503 So.2d 984 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); *Robbins v. State,*482 So.2d 580 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); *and Vandeneynden v. State,*478 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Assuming that the appropriate Indiana robbery statute is the same as that reproduced in *Brown v. State of Indiana,*178 Ind.App. 38, 381 N.E.2d 500 (1978), the defendant’s argument that the statute cannot be analogized to Florida’s has no merit. Sentencing guidelines intended to treat “conduct as it would be treated in Florida ...” *See Frazier v. State,*515 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). Thus, it is the nature of the prior crime that is to be considered when attempting to find an analogous Florida statute. *See Samples v. State,*516 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987). The penalty is not the determining factor. Unless the offense defined in the appropriate Indiana statute is significantly different from that in *Brown,*Rotz’ prior conviction should be scored as a second degree felony as there is no third degree felony in Florida for an analogous robbery offense. *See*§ 812.13, Fla. Statutes (1985).

The judgment is affirmed, the sentence vacated and this cause remanded for resen-tencing consistent with this opinion.

Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED; and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

1

. Scoring of a prior conviction is to be made as that crime was classified at the time it was committed. *See Frazier v. State,*515 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); *Johnson v. State,*476 So.2d 786 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
Amendment No. 3 to the Prioritized Listings Syndication Agreement



  
 Exhibit 10.55

  
 THIRD AMENDMENT
TO THE PRIORITIZED LISTINGS SYNDICATION AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN LOOKSMART, LTD. AND SEARCH 123 INC. 
  
 This Third Amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to the Prioritized Listings Syndication Agreement dated as of
August 21, 2001 (as amended to date, the “Agreement”) is entered into as of June 24, 2005 by and between LookSmart, Ltd., a Delaware corporation, (“LookSmart”) and Search123, Inc., a California corporation
(“Partner”). 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree that during the term of this Third Amendment, the Agreement (as amended) shall be amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The effective date of the Second Amendment (entered into on February 8, 2005) shall be November 4, 2004, for purposes of Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of the Agreement.


  

	 	2.	All other terms of the Agreement not expressly modified herein shall remain in full force and effect. 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Third Amendment as of the date set forth above. In the event of any conflict
between the terms hereof and the terms of the Agreement, the terms hereof shall govern. This Third Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which may be an original or fax copy, and all of which together shall form one instrument.

  

									
	LookSmart Ltd.	 	 	 	Search123, Inc.
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Bryan Everett
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ James Beriker

	 Name: Bryan Everett
	 	 	 	 Name: James Beriker

	 Title: SVP, Sales
	 	 	 	 Title: GM, ValueClick Search
VDOS Global, LLC 230 SW 61hStreet Corvallis, OR 97333 January 3, 2016 U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Amendment to VDOS Global Exemption No. 111128 Dear Sir or Madam, This is a request for an amendment to the existing Section 333 Exemption No. 111128 to add additional aircraft to the exemption-holder's authorized commercial operations. On April 29, 2015, the FAA granted this Petition for Exemption to operate small unmanned aircraft systems for the purpose of aerial data collection. The petitioner now seeks an amendment to its exemption authorizing the operation ofthe following additional unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for the purpose of aerial data collection:
• UASUSA Tempest • Falcon Unmanned Falcon • UAV Solutions Talon 120E Copies ofthe manufacturer flight manuals for each ofthese systems will be submitted to our docket. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me ifyou have any questions.



# Than**~---- --~** **>** Seth Johnson Chief Pilot VDOS Global, LLC
<PAGE>   1





                                   EXHIBIT 21
                                TO FORM 10-K OF
                           SEA PINES ASSOCIATES, INC.

                   Subsidiaries of Sea Pines Associates, Inc.

         Sea Pines Company, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, a wholly-owned
and the only subsidiary of Sea Pines Associates, Inc.  The active subsidiaries
of Sea Pines Company, Inc. are:

         (a)     Sea Pines Real Estate Company, Inc., a South Carolina
                 corporation doing business as Sea Pines Real Estate Company.

         (b)     Sea Pines Senior Living Center, Inc., a South Carolina
                 corporation.

         (c)     Sea Pines Forest Preserve Conservation Association, Inc., a
                 Delaware corporation.

         (d)     Lighthouse Realty, Inc., a South Carolina corporation.

         (e)     The Hilton Head Company, Inc., a South Carolina corporation.

         (f)     Sea Pines/TidePointe, Inc., a South Carolina corporation.

         (g)     Fifth Golf Course Club, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Thursday, March 22, 2012 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public.

      ( print page 16035)    

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

  Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of March 1, 2012.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-05: Tom Lantos for Congress Committee and The Lantos Foundation for Human Rights & Justice.

                        Draft Advisory Opinion 2012-06:                         *RickPerry.org,*                         Inc.                    

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shelley E. Garr, Deputy Secretary, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-6653 Filed 3-15-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### In re Virginia Carothers LoCOCO.

No. 87-OB-1355.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re LoCoco, Virginia Carothers; applying for permission to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination.

Motion granted.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 
 
 
 Certification of Principal Accounting
Officer Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10K-SB of Rotoblock Corporation
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Richard Di Stefano, Principal Accounting Officer, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:
 
 (1) the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 
 
 Date: September
13,
2008 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ 
Richard Di Stefano
 By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2










CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I,
Andrew Boetius, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to
my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:
      August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Andrew
      BoetiusAndrew
      BoetiusChief
      Financial Officer