alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 94

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9, 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, March 9, 2000, or

4 Friday, March 10, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant

5 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

6 designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on

7 Monday, March 20, 2000, or until such time on that day

8 as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee

9 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the

10 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur-
2

SCON 94 ATS

1 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

2 occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate, after con4 sultation with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall no5 tify the Members of the Senate to reassemble whenever,

6 in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
1

Pledger was subsequently transferred to the Federal Medical Center in

Rochester, Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3001

___________

William Pledger, III, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Marty C. Anderson, Warden, *

United States Medical Center for * [UNPUBLISHED]

Federal Prisoners, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: February 24, 2011

Filed: May 6, 2011

___________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

William Pledger appeals from an order of the United States District Court for

the Western District of Missouri dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pledger filed his petition in January 2009, while

confined at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri,1

 arguing

that his confinement pursuant to a 2004 commitment order entered in the United
-2-

States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas was unlawful because the

commitment proceedings did not comply with 18 U.S.C. § 4246. In dismissing

Pledger’s petition, the district court held that issues related to Pledger’s commitment

needed to be resolved in the committing court, as it was in the best position to evaluate

the merits of Pledger’s argument that the commitment order was invalid.

Upon review, we reverse the dismissal order, and we remand the case to the

district court with instructions to transfer the case to the Eastern District of Arkansas

“in the interest of justice.” See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) (district court may transfer to cure

venue defect “if it be in the interest of justice”); Archuleta v. Hedrick, 365 F.3d 644,

649 (8th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with

this opinion.

______________________________
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 69

Requesting that the United States Postal Service issue a commemorative

postal stamp honoring the 200th anniversary of the United States naval

shipyard system.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 5, 1999

Ms. SNOWE submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Requesting that the United States Postal Service issue a

commemorative postal stamp honoring the 200th anniversary of the United States naval shipyard system.

Whereas in the year 2000, the United States naval shipyards

will celebrate 200 years of service to the Nation;

Whereas naval technology has proven invaluable to the Nation by strengthening national defense, preserving world

maritime freedom, and producing scientific breakthroughs;

Whereas in peacetime, ships built in United States naval

shipyards patrol around the clock to preserve peace and

keep the United States free;

Whereas Kittery, Portsmouth Naval Shipyard was the first

major United States naval shipyard of the modern era;
2

•SCON 69 IS

Whereas on June 12, 2000, the Kittery, Portsmouth Naval

Shipyard will celebrate the 200th anniversary of its

founding;

Whereas since its inception at Kittery, Portsmouth, the

United States naval shipyard system has grown to include 11 facilities located on both the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, and at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii;

Whereas since 1800, United States naval shipyards have built

hundreds of naval ships, and completed thousands of

overhauls on ships of both the United States Navy and

those of many United States allies;

Whereas today, the United States Navy is the preeminent

naval force in the world, and ships constructed in United

States naval shipyards have helped lead the way to victory in numerous global conflicts; and

Whereas United States naval shipyard workers, both past and

present, have a well-deserved sense of pride in their accomplishments, which have kept our Navy strong and our

country free: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress requests that—

3 (1) the United States Postal Service issue a

4 commemorative postage stamp in honor of the 200th

5 anniversary of the founding of the United States

6 naval shipyards; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 recommend to the Postmaster General that such a

9 stamp be issued.

Æ
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edgar WELLS.

No. 87-KH-0098.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Wells, Edgar; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 308-477.

Granted and transferred to the Court of Appeal for consideration.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      August 16, 2010
              By:
              /s/Liu
      ChuanjieName:
              Liu
      ChuanjieTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Financial and
                Accounting
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Liu ChuanjieName:
Liu ChuanjieTitle:
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial andAccounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6629]



[[Page 16221]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the 
Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP):

SPP Strategic Planning Committee Task Force on Order No. 1000 Meeting

March 8, 2012

10:00-4 p.m., Local Time.

March 9, 2012

8:00-3 p.m., Local Time.

March 29, 2012

9:00-3 p.m., Local Time.
    The above-referenced meeting will be held at: AEP Offices, 1201 Elm 
Street, Dallas, TX 72501.

    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at www.spp.org.
    The discussions at the meetings described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:

    Docket No. ER09-35-001, Tallgrass Transmission, LLC.
    Docket No. ER09-36-001, Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC.
    Docket No. ER09-36-002, Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC.
    Docket No. ER09-548-001, ITC Great Plains, LLC.
    Docket No. ER11-4105-000, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Docket No. EL11-34-001, Midwest Independent Transmission System 
Operator, Inc.
    Docket No. ER11-3967-002, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Docket No. ER11-3967-003, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Docket No. ER12-1179-000, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.

    For more information, contact Luciano Lima, Office of Energy 
Markets
    Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-6210 
or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8849d8b81898687c684818589a88e8d9a8bc68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fe3faece6eee1e0a1e3e6e2eecfe9eafdeca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
 Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6629 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**SCC Desc**  **AZ SO2 Maricopa SO2**  **Az NOx Maricopa NOx** 

2102004000 Distillate combustion industrial boilers and IC engines 1,652.1 609.6 6,864.5 6,375.1 2103004000 Distillate commercial boilers and IC engines 483.5 271.3 3,373.1 3,273.4
Source: 2008 NEI (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2008inventory.html)

**2011 values, for comparison (using US EPA [Pechan] calculations): Maricopa SO2**  **Revised SO2 Maricopa NOx**  2102004001 Industrial distillate oil: Boilers 1.3 129.7 60.9 2102004002 Industrial distillate oil: Engines

- - 1,838.3 1.3 129.7 1,899.1

2103004001 Commercial/institutional distillate oil: Boilers 0.0 0.3 0.1 2103004002 Commercial/institutional distillate oil: Engines

- - 3.7 < 0.005 0.3 3.8EFs used: INDUSTRIAL
2008 (MCAQD) 2011 (Pechan) 2008 (MCAQD) 2011 (Pechan) PM10 2.0 2.3 42.5 43.5 PM2.5 2.0 1.55 42.5 40.8 NOx 24 20 604 604 SOx 7.39 0.426 39.70 0.426 VOC 0.2 CO 5 130 NHx 0.8 0.8 n/a

lb/Mgal

THROUGHPUT Mgals 65,634.56 6,086.95 18,501.53 6,086.95

84,136.09 vs 12,173.89 Boiler EnginesCOMMERCIAL/INSTITUTIONAL

2008 (MCAQD) 2011 (Pechan) 2008 (MCAQD) 2011 (Pechan)

1.08 42.5 1.08 42.5 24 604 7.1 39.7

0.8 Boiler Engines
#### Lonny Lawrence SUMPTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1969.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 11, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Fariba N. Komeily, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The Order of Revocation of Community Control is affirmed. The five-and-one-half-year prison term imposed upon the defendant on Count II, which charges the offense of possession of cocaine in violation of Section 893.13, Florida Statutes (1985), exceeds the maximum sentence which may be imposed for this third-degree felony and is accordingly reduced to five years. *See*§ 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1987). As modified, the sentence is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
#### James Renard HIGGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-1599.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL and DANIEL PEARSON, JJ., and MELVIN ORFINGER, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See State v. Castillo,*486 So. 2d 565 (Fla.1986); *Garcia v. State,*501 So.2d 106 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); *Rose v. State,*492 So.2d 1353 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986); *Compare Foster v. State,*464 So.2d 1214 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
EXHIBIT 10(c)

        Allonge to Amended and Restated Promissory Note between C.R.I., Inc.
                           and CRI/AIM Management, Inc. 




                 ALLONGE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED PROMISSORY NOTE


     This Allonge is entered into as of June 23, 1995 by and between C.R.I.,
INC., a Delaware corporation ("Maker") and CRI/AIM MANAGEMENT, INC., a Delaware
corporation ("Holder").


                                    RECITALS


     A.   Maker has delivered to Holder its Amended and Restated Promissory Note
dated March 27, 1995 in the principal sum of $6,000,000 (the "Note").  

     B.   Maker and Holder have agreed to a revised payment schedule with
respect to the Note.


     For good and valuable consideration the parties hereto agree as follows:

     1.   The outstanding principal balance of the Note as of the date hereof is
Five Million Two Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Three Dollars ($5,002,183).

     2.   Maker shall, on June 30, 1995, pay Holder all interest accrued with
respect to the Note through June 30, 1995.  

     3.   Commencing September 30, 1995, and continuing on the last day of each
calendar quarter through March 31, 2005, Maker shall make quarterly payments to
Holder of (i) principal of One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Fifty-Five Dollars
($125,055), and (ii) all interest which has accrued but not yet been paid as of
such last day of the calendar quarter.  

     4.   The entire balance of this Note, including interest, shall be due and
payable in full on June 30, 2005.  

     5.   Except as amended hereby, the parties hereto ratify and confirm the
Note as originally written. 

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Maker and Holder have entered into this Allonge as
of the day and year first above written.

                              C.R.I., INC.



                              By:  /s/ Richard J. Palmer
                                   ------------------------------
                                   Richard J. Palmer
                                   Senior Vice President/Finance



                              CRI/AIM MANAGEMENT, INC.



                              By:  /s/ H. William Willoughby
                                   --------------------------------
                                   H. William Willoughby, President

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enterasys Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard S. Haak, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ Richard S. Haak, Jr.
--------------------------------

Richard S. Haak, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
March 18, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,851
<SECURITIES>                                    49,073
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (40)
<INVENTORY>                                         72
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,498
<PP&E>                                          30,045
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,996)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,392
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           107
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,464
<SALES>                                         84,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,700
<CGS>                                           68,109
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,729
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,336
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66
        

</TABLE>
# Euroopan unionin C 70I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 070I |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 63. vuosikerta4. maaliskuu 2020 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 070I

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

63. vuosikerta4. maaliskuu 2020

---

| Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- |
| | Oikaisuja |
| | Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen PE/242/S – Johtaja (tehtäväryhmä AD, palkkaluokka 14) — Innovoinnin ja teknisen tuen pääosasto — Julkaisu-, innovointi- ja tiedonhallintaosasto ( EUVL C 065A, 28.2.2020 ) | 1 |

Sisältö

Sivu

Oikaisuja

Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen PE/242/S – Johtaja (tehtäväryhmä AD, palkkaluokka 14) — Innovoinnin ja teknisen tuen pääosasto — Julkaisu-, innovointi- ja tiedonhallintaosasto ( EUVL C 065A, 28.2.2020 )

( EUVL C 065A, 28.2.2020 )

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

Oikaisuja

| 4.3.2020 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CI 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2020

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CI 70/1

---

Oikaisu palvelukseenottoilmoitukseen PE/242/S – Johtaja (tehtäväryhmä AD, palkkaluokka 14) — Innovoinnin ja teknisen tuen pääosasto — Julkaisu-, innovointi- ja tiedonhallintaosasto

(
  Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti C 65 A, 28. helmikuuta 2020
  )

(2020/C 70 I/01)

Sivulla 57, kohdassa 2. Asemapaikka:

on:

”Luxemburg”

pitää olla:

”Bryssel”

---
#### STATE ex rel. Roderick WILSON v. Hon. Rudolph F. BECKER, III, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans.

No. 88-KH-2473.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Roderick Wilson, applying for Supervisory and/or remedial writs to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Sec. E, No. 260-558.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Eric E. Marin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Li3 Energy, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Li3 Energy, Inc.





Date: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Eric E. MarinName:
Eric E. MarinTitle:
Interim Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to Li3 Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Li3 Energy, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2386 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2386

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 
              acid, 4-amino-5-hydroxy-6-[[2-methoxy-5-[[2-
            (sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-3-[[4-[[2-
        (sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-, tetrasodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 
              acid, 4-amino-5-hydroxy-6-[[2-methoxy-5-[[2-
            (sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-3-[[4-[[2-
        (sulfooxy)ethyl]sulfonyl]phenyl]azo]-, tetrasodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 4-AMINO-5-HYDROXY-6-[[2-
              METHOXY-5-[[2-(SULFOOXY)ETHYL]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AZO]-3-[[4-
              [[2-(SULFOOXY)ETHYL]SULFONYL]PHENYL]AZO]-, TETRASODIUM 
              SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Naphthalenesulfonic acid, 
7-[(5-chloro-2,6-difluoro-4-pyrimidinyl)amino]-4-hydroxy-3-[(4-methoxy-
2-sulfophenyl)azo]-, sodium salt) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```