alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT
#1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE


ISSUED ON
SEPTEMBER 14, 2020


 


THIS AMENDMENT
#1 TO THE CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE ISSUED ON September 14, 2020 (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of October
31, 2020 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Ethema Health Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the “Company”),
and Joshua Bauman (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A. The Company and Holder
are the parties to that certain convertible promissory


note originally issued by the Company
to the Holder on September 14, 2020in the original principal amount of $110,000.00 (the “Note”);


 


B. The Holder
has advanced additional funds to the Company in the principal amount of $25,000.00 on or about October 12, 2020.


 


B. The Parties
desire to amend the Note as set forth expressly below.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and


other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby


acknowledged, the Parties agree
as follows:


 


1. The Parties
agree that the face amount of the Note will increase from $110,000.00 to $137,500.00 and all other terms of the note will remain
the same.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first


above written.


 


	Ethema
    Healthcare Corporation	 	Joshua
    Bauman	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	                                                       	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
    __________________________________                                      __________________________________
	Name:
    Shawn Leon                                                                           	 	 	 
	Title:
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K
(the "Form 10-K") for the year ended December 31, 2003 of CRIIMI MAE Inc. (the "Issuer").

I,
Barry S. Blattman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



|March 12, 2004 |  | /s/BARRY S. BLATTMAN                                               
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |                                                                    
|DATE           |  | Barry S. Blattman
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 181 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 181

  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the situation in East 
                                 Timor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 10, 1999

 Mr. Harkin (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Chafee, and Mr. 
 Wellstone) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the situation in East 
                                 Timor.

Whereas on May 5, 1999, the Governments of Indonesia and Portugal signed an 
        agreement that provided for an August 8, 1999, ballot organized by the 
        United Nations on the political status of East Timor;
Whereas under the May 5th agreement the Government of Indonesia freely agreed to 
        be responsible for establishing a secure environment in East Timor that 
        would be free of intimidation and violence;
Whereas on August 30, 1999, 78 percent of the people in East Timor voted for 
        independence; and
Whereas, after the vote for independence, the militias in East Timor intensified 
        their reign of terror against the people of East Timor unrestrained by 
        the Government of Indonesia: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE SITUATION IN EAST TIMOR.

    (a) In General.--The Senate hereby--
            (1) congratulates the people of East Timor for their heroic 
        vote on August 30, 1999;
            (2) recognizes that the people of East Timor voted for 
        independence;
            (3) condemns the violence of the militias in East Timor and 
        the inaction by the Government of Indonesia to end the 
        violence; and
            (4) calls on the Government of Indonesia to end all 
        violence in accordance with the May 5, 1999 agreement.
    (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that--
            (1) the President of the United States should instruct the 
        United States Permanent Representative to the United Nations to 
        immediately seek the United Nations Security Council 
        authorization for the deployment of an international force to 
        address the security situation in East Timor; and
            (2) the United States should assist in this effort in an 
        appropriate manner.

SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF RESOLUTION.

    The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of this 
resolution to the President.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17080-17081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7091]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 17081]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Mentored Patient-Oriented 
Research Career Development Application.
    Date: April 19, 2012.
    Time: 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35545e01045a755b5c5d1b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e0f055a5f012e00070640090118">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7091 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2288-2289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14071-000; Project No. 12866-002]


FFP Project 10, LLC, Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; 
Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications 
deemed

[[Page 2289]]

filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed projects to be 
located on the Mississippi River, near the town of Avondale, in 
Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. The applications were filed by FFP Project 
10, LLC for Project No. 12866-002, and Northland Power Mississippi 
River LLC for Project No. 14071-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the 
Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine 
the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The 
Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided 
in section 4.37 of its regulations.\2\ The priority established by this 
drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with 
identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed 
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the 
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 
20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing 
the results of the drawing.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-704 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Mary BROUSSARD v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 88-CC-0073.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re United States Fire Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW87-1282; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 86-51284-J.

Writ granted. The judgments of the court of appeal and the district court are reversed. Blanket production of the attorney’s and insurer’s files is not permitted. The plaintiff is free to renew her discovery requests upon identifying the documents or types of documents she seeks. If any such requested documents are those prepared in anticipation of litigation, those documents should not be produced unless the plaintiff makes the showing required by La.Civ. Code Proc. art. 1422. In all events, documents which contain the opinions, conclusions, theories or mental impressions of the defendant’s attorney as well as privileged communications are not discoverable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       1863534
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1863534)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    25402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (25402)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (25402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (25402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.3

CONSENT OF GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC.

June
28, 2004

As
independent reserve engineers for Repsol YPF S.A., Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc. hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in Section 2.2.1.1 "Oil and
Gas Reserves" in Repsol YPF, S.A.'s annual report on Form 20-F (the "Form 20-F") for the year ended December 31, 2003 and in the Supplementary Information
on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities (unaudited information) to the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein. Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc. also consents to
the references made in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-12254 and 333-10668 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission into which the Form 20-F
will be incorporated by reference.



---



QuickLinks
#### STATE of Louisiana v. John HOFFMAN.

No. KA 87 1105.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1987.

Bryan Bush, Dist. Atty. by Douglas Simmons, Asst. Dist. Atty., Baton Rouge, for plaintiff/ appellee.

J. Peyton Parker, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

APPEAL DISMISSED: This matter is not appealable. *See*La. Const. Art. I, § 17, and Art. X, § 10 (A) (3); La. R.S. 14:98 C; La. C.Cr.P. art. 779. Since the “appeal” does not comply with Rule 4, Uniform Rules — Courts of Appeal, it will not be considered as an application for writ of review. *See State v. Clause,*486 So.2d 1206 at fn. 2 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986). Relator may file a proper application for writ of review in accord with Rule 4.
#### Edwin H. POOLE, et ux. v. PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 88-C-0007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Stamper, Charles J. Dr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19090-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 312509.

Prior report: La.App., 516 So.2d 1185.

Denied.
#### Eve Stoker *vs.*City of Minneapolis.

November 29, 1884.

Contributory Negligence — Evidence.—Evidence as to plaintiff’s contributory negligence *held*sucii as to justify a submission of the case to the jury.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin' county, *Young,*J., presiding, refusing a new trial, after a verdict of $2,300, for injuries occasioned by plaintiff’s falling into a ditch or gully in Fifth street, in Minneapolis, between seven and eight o’clock in the evening of October 25, 1883. The street had been graded up with sand, which had been washed out by water used in *479•extinguishing a fire near the place of the accident, on October 7th, the gully being about three feet deep and about four and one-half feet wide. The plaintiff’s testimony was to the effect that she was crossing Fifth street, it being quite dark, and came to the ditch across which two planks had been placed. She tried the planks, and, being a heavy woman, was afraid they would not sustain her weight, and so went a few steps along the side of the ditch, when the bank gave way and .she fell in, receiving the injuries complained of. She had no previous knowledge of the condition of the street.

*Judso)i N. Cross,*for appellant.

*Thomas Canty,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

The defendant insists that plaintiff’s own evidence showed her to have been guilty of negligence that contributed to the injury, and that the case ought, therefore, to have been dismissed on its motion. On that point the evidence made the case a very close one, but we think different minds might fairly arrive at different conclusions upon it, and that the case was properly left to the jury.

Order affirmed.
No. 83705 

FILE 

DEC 1 7 2021 

ELIZA:BF:1H A. BROWN 

CLERK ' aiPREME COURT 

BY— 

Oz..:PUTsf CLERK 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

THERESE WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

WASHOE; AND THE HONORABLE 

LYNNE K. SIMONS, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

ASHLEE ORNDORFF, 

Real Party in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a 

district court order denying a motion for summary judgment. Having 

considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not 

persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is 

warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 

P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the 

burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing 

that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole 

discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Specifically, 

we generally decline to exercise our discretion to grant writ petitions 

challenging orders denying motions for summary judgment, and we are not 

convinced any of the exceptions apply in this case. See Smith v. Eighth 

c71 -3s 

- 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(()) 1947A cagrop 
, C.J. 

Hardesty 

Herndon 

Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) 

(discussing the exceptions to the general rule). We therefore 

ORDER the petition DENIED.' 

Sr.J. 

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge 

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Reno 

Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP/Las Vegas 

Leverty & Associates Law, Chtd. 

Steven J. Klearman & Associates 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the 

decision of this matter under a general order of assignment. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A adages 

2 

i..;,1•14iitt 7if.f
#### Douglas James ALWARD, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 82 SC 274.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

March 13, 1984.

Jody Sorenson Theis, Deputy State Public Defender, for petitioner.

Maureen Phelan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

ORDER OP COURT

Upon consideration of the record on appeal and briefs .filed herein, and having heard the oral arguments of counsel,

It Is This Day Ordered that the Petition for Writ of Certiorari shall be, and the same hereby is, Dismissed as improvidently granted.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL MENDEZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CITY OF BOISE, a municipal corporation; 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-35474 

D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00061-BLW 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Raul Mendez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of a dispute regarding 

sewer fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a 

district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Watison v. Carter, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-35474 

668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Mendez’s procedural due process claim 

because Mendez failed to allege facts sufficient to show that he was denied any 

process to which he was entitled prior to being charged sewer fees. See Hotel & 

Motel Ass’n of Oakland v. City of Oakland, 344 F.3d 959, 968-70 (9th Cir. 2003)

(explaining that “laws of general applicability affecting a broad geographic area” 

ordinarily do not implicate individual procedural due process concerns).

The district court properly dismissed Mendez’s Fair Debt Collection 

Practices Act (“FDCPA”) claim because, even assuming the sewer fees qualified 

as a “debt” under the FDCPA, Mendez failed to allege facts sufficient to show that 

any defendant was a “debt collector” within the meaning of the FDCPA. See 15 

U.S.C. § 1692a(6) (defining “debt collector” under the FDCPA as “any person . . . 

who regularly collects or attempts to collect . . . debts owed . . . another”); Hebbe 

v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se pleadings are 

liberally construed, plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Mendez leave to 

amend because amendment would have been futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide 

Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of 

review and stating that leave to amend may be denied where amendment would be 

futile).
3 20-35474 

We reject as meritless Mendez’s contention that the district court failed to 

liberally construe his complaint.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.