alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Saflink Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon C. Engman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 30,2007
#### Martin James KEEGAN and Barbara Keegan, his wife, Appellants, v. STATE of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellee.

No. 87-0589.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 1, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1988.

Melanie G. May of Bunnell, Denman & Woulfe, P.A., and F. Blane Carneal, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

David W. Black of Atkinson, Jenne, Diner, Stone & Cohen, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants seek reversal of a summary final judgment. We affirm on the authority of *Trianon Park Condominium Association v. City of Hialeah,*468 So.2d 912 (Fla.1985); *Reddish v. Smith,*468 So.2d 929 (Fla.1985); *Parker v. Murphy,*510 So.2d 990 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,880,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,047,606
<PP&E>                                       7,862,089
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,522,412
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,387,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          112,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,274,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,387,283
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,335,351
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               767,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,589
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                563,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            563,044
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   563,044
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 10.2**

**DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON**

500 | SPRING VALLEY ROAD

SUITE 800 EAST

DALLAS, TEXAS 75244 

May 29, 2008 

Repsol YPF, S.A. 

Paseo de la Castellana278 – 280 

28046 Madrid 

Spain 

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen: 

We hereby consent to thereferences to DeGolyer and MacNaughton and the inclusion of information derived from our reports entitled “Report as of December 31, 2005 on Reserves of Certain Properties in Argentina attributable to Repsol YPF,” “Report as ofSeptember 30, 2006 on Reserves of Certain Properties in Argentina attributable to Repsol YPF,” and “Report as of September 30, 2007 on Reserves of Certain Properties in Argentina attributable to Repsol YPF” in the sections listedbelow of the Form 20-F for the year ending December 31, 2007, of Repsol YPF, S.A. (the Form 20-F) and in the “Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities (unaudited information)” in the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements included in the Form 20-F: 

“Part I 

2.2.1.1 Internal Controls on Reserves and Reserves Audits” 

“Part III 

15. Exhibits” 

DEGOLYERAND MACNAUGHTON

“Part III 

Consolidated Financial Statements

Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities (Unaudited Information) 

Estimated proved net developed and undeveloped oil and gas reserves:” 

 
Very truly yours,
50191.

#### BAKER v. THE STATE.

Submitted February 4, 1975

Decided February 21, 1975.

Lee H. Baker, *pro se.*

Quillian, Judge.

The record in this case having been considered, the appeal is without merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                   ----------



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc.
Brentwood, New York

         We hereby  consent to the  inclusion in the Allou Health & Beauty Care,
Inc.'s  Annual  Report on Form  10-K for the year  ended  March 31,  2000 of our
report dated June 19, 2000 related to the consolidated  financial statements and
schedules of Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. and subsidiaries.



/S/ MAYER RISPLER & COMPANY, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

June 29, 2000
New York, New York
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-741]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7719]


Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of the Advisory Committee charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Renewal of Advisory Committee: The Secretary of State announces the 
renewal of the charter of the Advisory Committee on International 
Postal and Delivery Services in fulfillment of the provisions of the 
2006 Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Purpose: The purpose of the Advisory Committee is to serve the 
Department of State in an advisory capacity with respect to the 
formulation, coordination, and oversight of foreign policy related to 
international postal services and other international delivery 
services. The Committee provides a forum for government employees, 
representatives of the industry sector and members of the public to 
present their advice and views directly to the Department of State.
    For further information, please contact Dennis Delehanty, Office of 
Global Systems (IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization Affairs, 
U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-4197.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Dennis M. Delehanty,
Foreign Affairs Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-741 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January
                22, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
                M. CancioHugo
                M. CancioTitle:
                Principal Financial Officer
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-13-00954-CR

RAYMOND BUCHANAN, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 300th District Court of Brazoria County. (Tr. Ct. No. 68872).

TO THE 300TH DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 16th day of December 2014, the case upon appeal to revise 

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by 

the trial court on October 18, 2013. After submitting the case 

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by 

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment 

contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms 

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered December 16, 2014.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and 
Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in 

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 22, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis LEMOINE.

No. 86-KK-2395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Lemoine, Louis; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 86-474; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86 K 573.

Denied.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O . 09

- 19

- 00173

- CR

__________________

MICHAEL WAYNE OSBORNE , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19

- 31505

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 5, 2019, we notified the parties that our jurisdiction was not apparent

from the notice of appeal and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want

of jurisdiction unless we received a response showing grounds for continuing the

appeal. Appellant file d a response, but he failed to articulate a valid basis for

jurisdiction in that response.2

Appellant has failed to demonstrate that the trial court has signed an order that

is appealable at this time. See McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

—

Fo rt Worth 1996, no pet.) (holding that intermediate appellate courts lack

jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders unless such jurisdiction is expressly

granted by statute). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on August 6 , 2019

Opinion Delivered August 7 , 2019

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                          19,057,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,162,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,536,000
<INVENTORY>                                      9,724,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,375,000
<PP&E>                                          48,251,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,754,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,670,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,295,000
<BONDS>                                          5,922,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           323,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,130,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,670,000
<SALES>                                         60,833,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,165,000
<CGS>                                           46,606,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,606,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,413,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (623,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,587,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,587,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (1,094,000)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,681,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.08)



</TABLE>
# Europos Sąjungos C 70I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 070I |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 63 metai2020m. kovo 4d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 070I

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

63 metai2020m. kovo 4d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| | Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos PE/242/S – Direktorius (mot. / vyr.) (AD pareigų grupė, 14 lygis). Naujovių ir technologinės pagalbos generalinis direktoratas. Leidybos, naujovių ir duomenų tvarkymo direktoratas – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 065A, 2020 2 28 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos PE/242/S – Direktorius (mot. / vyr.) (AD pareigų grupė, 14 lygis). Naujovių ir technologinės pagalbos generalinis direktoratas. Leidybos, naujovių ir duomenų tvarkymo direktoratas – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 065A, 2020 2 28 )

( OL C 065A, 2020 2 28 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 4.3.2020 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CI 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2020

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CI 70/1

---

Skelbimo dėl rengiamos atrankos PE/242/S – Direktorius (mot. / vyr.) (AD pareigų grupė, 14 lygis). Naujovių ir technologinės pagalbos generalinis direktoratas. Leidybos, naujovių ir duomenų tvarkymo direktoratas – klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 65 A, 2020 m. vasario 28 d.
  )

(2020/C 70 I/01)

57 puslapis, 2 punktas. Paskyrimo vieta:

yra:

„Liuksemburgas.“

turi būti:

„Briuselis.“

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3050

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Steven Ramirez, also known as Steven Ramiriz

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

 ____________

 Submitted: March 27, 2019

Filed: April 23, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Steven Ramirez appeals after he pleaded guilty to a drug charge and the District

Court1

 sentenced him to the statutorily mandated minimum prison term based in part

1

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
on a 21 U.S.C. § 851 information filed by the government. Ramirez’s counsel has

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the District

Court erred in sentencing Ramirez because the § 851 information referenced a prior

conviction that was more than fifteen years old. Counsel also requests leave to

withdraw.

Although Ramirez’s plea agreement includes an appeal waiver, we decline to

enforce the waiver because the District Court at Ramirez’s change-of-plea hearing did

not adequately explain the terms of the waiver and ensure that Ramirez understood

them. See United States v. Boneshirt, 662 F.3d 509, 515–16 (8th Cir. 2011), cert.

denied, 565 U.S. 1227 (2012). 

Considering the merits of the Anders argument, we conclude that the District

Court did not err in sentencing Ramirez. There was nothing improper about the

government’s filing of the § 851 information, and Ramirez’s prior conviction required

the court to impose a prison term of at least ten years. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)

(setting forth penalties); id. § 851 (setting forth procedures to establish prior

convictions that may subject a defendant to increased punishment); United States v.

Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003) (discussing the limited circumstances

in which a district court may impose a sentence below the statutory minimum); see

also United States v. LaBonte, 520 U.S. 751, 761–62 (1997) (explaining that a

prosecutor’s discretion in seeking an enhanced sentence based on a § 851 notice is

similar to the discretion exercised in deciding what charges to bring and “is

appropriate so long as it is not based upon improper factors”).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), and we have identified no non-frivolous issues for appeal. We grant

counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm.

________________________________

-2-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2007 to which this certification is beingfurnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date: November 13, 2007** | ** **                     |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                        | /s/ John Fitzpatrick           |
|                        | Name: John Fitzpatrick         |
|                        | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

----
#### CITY OF NORTH PORT, Petitioner, v. Ronald FAUST, James Beck and Jean Ann Holmes, Respondents.

No. 86-71.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 14, 1986.

Claire L. Hamner, of Dickinson, O’Rior-den, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for petitioner.

John L. Polk, Punta Gorda, for respondents.

RYDER, Chief Judge.

The lawsuit underlying this petition for the issuance of a writ of certiorari stems from a motorcycle accident within the city limits of North Port. The city was one of several defendants named in respondents’ complaint. North Port moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, specifically claiming that the city was protected from suit by sovereign immunity. The city also contended that the cause of action did not accrue in Charlotte County. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the basis of improper venue,1 but denied the motion to dismiss “for failure to state a cause of action.” North Port then filed with this court a petition for the issuance of a writ of certiorari.

We decline to reach North Port’s sovereign immunity argument, including the question whether certiorari is an appropriate remedy for interlocutory review of any determination that the city is not im-*46muñe. The motion to dismiss on grounds of sovereign immunity is a matter which more properly should be considered after the transfer of the cause to the proper forum. *Cf. Straughn v. Grootemaat,*291 So.2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). A court cannot transfer venue in a cause and rule on the merits at the same time. *Ven-Fuel v. Jacksonville Electric Authority,*332 So.2d 81 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

The petition is, therefore, denied.

SCHOONOVER and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

1

. When improper venue is alleged, transfer of the cause generally is preferable to dismissal. *James A. Knowles, Inc. v. Imperial Lumber Co.,*238 So.2d 487 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970). *Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner and Smith, Inc. v. National Bank of Melbourne and Trust Co.,*238 So.2d 665 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). However, the correctness of the trial court's use of the term “dismissed” is not an issue before us.
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  South  Texas  Oil  Company  (the
"Company") on Form  10-QSB/A for the  period  ending  June 30, 2005  as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive Officer  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant   to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to  the best of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the
Company.

                         /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                         -------------------------------------------
                         MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: October 7, 2005