alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
21**








**LIST
OF SUBSIDIARIES**








**Name
      of Subsidiary**
    **Jurisdiction
      of Incorporation**Gulfport
      Shipping Limited
    BahamasInternational
      Consulting and Management Limited
    St.
      Vincent & the GrenadinesKaplan
      Shipping Co. Limited
    BahamasKokomo
      Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Chantilly Limited
    BahamasMC
      Cormorant Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Eid Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Egret Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Heron Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Ibis Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Kite Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Link Shipping Limited
    St.
      Vincent & the GrenadinesMC
      Pelerin Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Shipping S.A.M.
    MonacoMC
      Shrike Shipping Limited
    BahamasMC
      Tercel Shipping Limited
    BahamasSphinx
      Limited
    St.
      Vincent & the GrenadinesUrbana
      Shipping Limited
    Bahamas
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 133

To correct the enrollment of S. 1809.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. JEFFORDS submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of S. 1809.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Secretary of the Senate, in the en3 rollment of the bill (S.1809) to improve service systems

4 for individuals with developmental disabilities, and for

5 other purposes, shall make the following corrections:

6 (1) Strike ‘‘1999’’ each place it appears (other

7 than in section 101(a)(2)) and insert ‘‘2000’’.

8 (2) In section 101(a)(2), strike ‘‘are’’ and in9 sert ‘‘were’’.

10 (3) In section 104(a)—
2

•SCON 133 ATS

1 (A) in paragraphs (1), (3)(C), and (4),

2 strike ‘‘2000’’ each place it appears and insert

3 ‘‘2001’’; and

4 (B) in paragraph (4), strike ‘‘fiscal year

5 2001’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal year 2002’.’

6 (4) In section 124(c)(4)(B)(i), strike ‘‘2001’’

7 and insert ‘‘2002’’.

8 (5) In section 125(c)—

9 (A) in paragraph (5)(H), strike ‘‘assess’’

10 and insert ‘‘access’’; and

11 (B) in paragraph (7), strike ‘‘2001’’ and

12 insert ‘‘2002’’.

13 (6) In section 129(a)—

14 (A) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and insert

15 ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and

16 (B) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 through

17 2006’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002 through

18 2007’’.

19 (7) In section 144(e), strike ‘‘2001’’ and insert

20 ‘‘2002’’.

21 (8) In section 145—

22 (A) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and insert

23 ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and
3

•SCON 133 ATS

1 (B) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 through

2 2006’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002 through

3 2007’’.

4 (9) In section 156—

5 (A) in subsection (a)(1)—

6 (i) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and in7 sert ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and

8 (ii) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 through

9 2006’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002

10 through 2007’’; and

11 (B) in subsection (b), strike ‘‘2000’’ each

12 place it appears and insert ‘‘2001’’.

13 (10) In section 163—

14 (A) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and insert

15 ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and

16 (B) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 through

17 2006’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002 through

18 2007’’.

19 (11) In section 212, strike ‘‘2000 through

20 2006’’ and insert ‘‘2001 through 2007’’.

21 (12) In section 305—

22 (A) in subsection (a)—

23 (i) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and in24 sert ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and
4

•SCON 133 ATS

1 (ii) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 through

2 2006’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002

3 through 2007’’; and

4 (B) in subsection (b)—

5 (i) strike ‘‘fiscal year 2000’’ and in6 sert ‘‘fiscal year 2001’’; and

7 (ii) strike ‘‘fiscal years 2001 and

8 2002’’ and insert ‘‘fiscal years 2002 and

9 2003’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 91 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.91
                                         Agreed to March 8, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible 
  incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania 
  into the former Soviet Union;
Whereas the declaration on March 11, 1990, of the reestablishment of 
  full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Lithuania led to 
  the disintegration of the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Lithuania since then has successfully built democracy, ensured 
  human and minority rights, the rule of law, developed a free market 
  economy, implemented exemplary relations with neighboring countries, 
  and consistently pursued a course of integration into the community 
  of free and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European 
  Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
Whereas Lithuania, as a result of the progress of its political and 
  economic reforms, has made, and continues to make, a significant 
  contribution toward the maintenance of international peace and 
  stability by, among other actions, its participation in NATO-led 
  peacekeeping operations in Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby--
        (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occasion of the tenth 
    anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence and the 
    leading role it played in the disintegration of the former Soviet 
    Union; and
        (2) commends Lithuania for its success in implementing 
    political and economic reforms, which may further speed the process 
    of that country's integration into European and Western 
    institutions.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATIONS      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                for the period certified. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                |                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|        | By:                                       | /s/ Ramesh              Akella |
|   | Ramesh              Akella                          |
|   | President,              Chief              Strategy |
|   | Officer and Director                                |

----
#### STATE ex rel. Richard LAY v. ST. TAMMANY PARISH, DISTRICT COURT, DIV. C, C. Paul Phelps and the Dept. of Corrections.

No. 87-KH-0288.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Lay, Richard; applying for remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 74762.

Denied. Relator must first seek relief in the district court.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 169 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 169

        Commending General Wesley K. Clark, United States Army.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 1999

  Mr. Cochran (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. Graham) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                           on Armed Services

                             August 2, 1999

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Commending General Wesley K. Clark, United States Army.

Whereas General Wesley K. Clark has had a long and distinguished military 
        career, which includes graduating first in the class of 1966 from the 
        United States Military Academy at West Point and serving in command 
        positions at every level in the United States Army, culminating in 
        service concurrently in the positions of Supreme Allied Commander, 
        Europe and Commander-in-Chief of the United States European Command;
Whereas General Clark was integral to the formulation of the Dayton Accords;
Whereas General Clark most recently distinguished himself by his tireless, 
        resourceful, and successful leadership of the first military action of 
        the North Atlantic Treaty Organization despite severe constraints; and
Whereas General Clark's record of exemplary and dedicated service is an example 
        which all military officers should seek to emulate and is deserving of 
        special recognition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
             (1) the United States Senate commends and expresses its 
        gratitude to General Wesley K. Clark, United States Army, for 
        his outstanding record of military service to the United States 
        of America; and
            (2) the Secretary of the Senate shall transmit a copy of 
        this resolution to General Wesley K. Clark.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of APD Antiquities, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Cindy K. Swank, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                        |                                                       
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  August 16, 2010 | By: /s/ Cindy K. Swank                                
|                        | Cindy K. Swank                                        
|                        | President, Treasurer, CEO, Principal Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
22, 2012 at 1 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the 
items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 22, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the 
scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 15, 2012.
Lynn Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6766 Filed 3-16-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### John V. LEWIS, Collector of Internal Revenue for the First Collection District of California, Appellant, v. TRANSAMERICA CORPORATION, a Corporation, Appellee.

No. 9423.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 22, 1940.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and Esther B. Phillips, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Claude I. Parker and Bayley Kohlmeier,. both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for respective parties for dismissal of the appeal herein, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 765, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal herein dismissed, that a judgment of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this, court in this cause issue forthwith.
Exhibit 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             as Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

           In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bremer
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003 (the
"Periodic Report")and as amended on Form 10K/A filed on May 13, 2003, I, Stan K.
Dardis , Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1.         The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
           13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
           or 78o(d)); and

2.         The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
           all material respects, the financial condition and results of
           operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 13, 2003                        /s/Stan K. Dardis
---------------------                ---------------------------------
                                              Stan K. Dardis
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              Bremer Financial Corporationr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996                         
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996                        
<CASH>                                           2,260                        
<SECURITIES>                                         0                        
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,913                        
<ALLOWANCES>                                       414                        
<INVENTORY>                                      2,810                        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,398                        
<PP&E>                                           1,356                        
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,832                        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,764                        
<BONDS>                                          4,250                        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                        
<PREFERRED>                                          0                        
<COMMON>                                            10                        
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,809                        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,832                        
<SALES>                                         17,056                        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,056                        
<CGS>                                           12,102                          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,505                         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258                        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,707)                         
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,707)                        
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                        
<CHANGES>                                            0                        
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,707)                         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)                         
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)                          
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 73 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 73

      Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Freedom Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 10, 1999

Mr. Lieberman submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
      Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding Freedom Day.

Whereas on November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall was torn down by those whom it had 
        imprisoned;
Whereas the fall of the Berlin Wall has become the preeminent symbol of the end 
        of the Cold War;
Whereas the Cold War, at its essence, was a struggle for human freedom;
Whereas the end of the Cold War was brought about in large measure by the 
        dedication, sacrifice, and discipline of Americans and many other 
        peoples around the world united in their opposition to Soviet Communism;
Whereas freedom's victory in the Cold War against Soviet Communism is the 
        crowning achievement of the free world's long 20th century struggle 
        against totalitarianism; and
Whereas it is highly appropriate to remind Americans, particularly those in 
        their formal educational years, that America paid the price and bore the 
        burden to ensure the survival of liberty on this planet: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) a Freedom Day should be celebrated each year in the 
        United States; and
            (2) the United States should join with other nations, 
        specifically including those which liberated themselves to help 
        end the Cold War, to establish a global holiday called Freedom 
        Day.
                                 <all>
```
50202.

#### BUFFALO CAB COMPANY, INC. v. GURLEY et al.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Mrs. Gurley’s hand was injured in a collision between an automobile driven by her son and the defendant’s taxi, driven by defendant Dozier. Mrs. Dozier, backing out of the lot used by the taxi company, collided *168with the left rear of the Gurley vehicle which was moving forward in the farther lane of traffic. The defendant contended that plaintiffs vehicle attempted to pass on the right as she was straightening out and entering this lane; plaintiff contends the taxi backed into the Gurley car as it was proceeding forward in its own lane of travel. The jury returned a verdict against the appellant. *Held:*

1. Three of the four enumerations of error deal with answers deleted on objection from a deposition given by the plaintiffs physician. All of these answers referred to a possible alternate diagnosis based on a pathology report made by an undesignated person other than the deponent, and which was not offered in evidence. Testimony which depends on a laboratory report is inadmissible unless the report is admissible as a business record or the facts relied on therein are otherwise proved. *Douglas v. American Cas. Co.,*106 Ga. App. 744, 747 (128 SE2d 364). "Opinion testimony based merely upon records and case history furnished the witness by other doctors and not a part of the evidence in the case is objectionable.” *Zurich Ins. Co. v. Zerfass,*106 Ga. App. 714, 719 (128 SE2d 75). It was not error to rule out the material objected to by the plaintiff.

2. The remaining enumeration of error contends that the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion for directed verdict. Although the cab driver testified that she had ceased work for the day and was on her way home, with members of her family in the car, it is also true that she was driving the taxi out from the defendant’s lot, where she had gone to transact business, at the time of the collision. Further, the defendant’s original answer (later stricken by amendment) admitted that *at the time and place of the collision*the defendant owned the vehicle and *it was being operated*as a taxicab, and that Mrs. Dozier was at that time an agent and employee of the defendant and acting within the scope of her employment. These admissions were introduced in evidence. Such an admission, introduced in evidence "is some evidence, in and of itself, to take to the jury the question of whether it or contrary evidence is true.” *Richmond County v. Sibert,*218 Ga. 209, 212 (126 SE2d 761). To the same effect see *O’Connor v. Bradford,*94 Ga. App. 852, 860 (96 SE2d 511). The stricken admissions *169together with the facts proved presented a jury issue, and it was not error to deny the motion for a directed verdict.

Argued February 10, 1975

Decided March 5, 1975.

*O’Brien, Smith & Reily, Michael J. Reily, Robert E. Reily, III,*for appellants.

*Carter, Ansley, Smith & McLendon, H. Sanders Carter, Jr.,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.*