alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of AMH Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the
period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D. Keith LaVanway, Vice
President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: November 16, 2004.                By: /s/ D. Keith LaVanway
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            D. Keith LaVanway
                                            Vice President - Finance,
                                            Chief Financial Officer,
                                            Assistant Treasurer and Assistant
                                            Secretary
                                            (Principal Financial Officer and
                                            Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                      -24-
-82 -80 -78 -76

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■ ■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
#### STATE ex rel. Gene R. HESS, Sr. v. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL, 25TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 87-KH-2766.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Hess, Gene Sr.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 87-2, 86-3375, 86-4012 and 86-3469; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-9038.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 22, 2011
/s/ Jing XieJing XieChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1






Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to




Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350










In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rotoblock Corporation (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chien Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer, hereby





certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:






(1) the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.










Date: December 9, 2010








ROTOBLOCK CORPORATION




/s/ Chien Chih Liu





By: Chien Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 22, 2011
/s/ Jing XieJing XieChief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Ira CAMPBELL, III v. LA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 89-KH-1333.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Campbell, Ira; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, No. 331027-K.

Denied. A hearing has been set for September 13, 1989.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2459 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2459

      To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(4-t-butylcyclohexyl) 
                           peroxydicarbonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on bis(4-t-butylcyclohexyl) 
                           peroxydicarbonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIS(4-T-BUTYLCYCLOHEXYL) PEROXYDICARBONATE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Bis(4-t-            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          butylcyclohexyl)                                                   31/2011.......
                          peroxydicarbonate
                          (CAS No. 15520-11-
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2920.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

       (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


I, Robert E. Williams (principal financial and accounting
officer) of J R Bassett Optical, Inc.(the "Registrant"),
certify to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Annual Report on Form 10KSB/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") of the Registrant, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as
amended; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report, fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Registrant.


September 19, 2005                  /s/Robert E. Williams
                                    -----------------------
                                    Robert E. Williams
                                    President/C.E.O.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 15 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2011 Revision, published July 1, 2011, at 76 FR 38892.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given by the Treasury that the above-named companies formally changed their “BUSINESS ADDRESS” to “62 Maple Avenue, Keene, NH 03431” effective immediately. In addition, the above named companies have redomesticated from the state of Washington to the state of New Hampshire effective January 13, 2012. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2011 Revision, to reflect these changes.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

 Dated: March 18, 2012.

Laura Carrico,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 2012-7305 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
<PAGE>   1

                                 EXHIBIT 24(a)


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                 AND GEOLOGISTS


We hereby consent to the references to our firm and our report and to the use of
our report in the Annual Report of Chieftain International, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.



                                            NETHERLAND, SEWELL AND ASSOCIATES
                                            INC.




                                            By: /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Frederic D. Sewell
                                               President

Dallas, Texas
March 11, 1999
Dismissed; Opinion Filed April 26, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00010-CV

BRIAN WEST, Appellant

V.

READY ROOFING AND RENOVATION, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-01846-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due on April 5, 2019. On April 8, 2019, the Collin 

County District Clerk notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant 

had not yet paid for the record. In light of this, we directed appellant to provide the Court, by April 

19, 2019, with written verification that payment or payment arrangements had been made with the 

district clerk or written documentation that appellant had been found to be entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(a)(2). We cautioned appellant that the failure 

to do so might result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b). Three days later, appellant’s attorney filed a letter stating that “Appellant has not paid the 

fees and costs associated with this appeal to date, or delivered those funds to counsel to make 

payment from.”
–2–

Because appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or shown 

he was entitled to proceed without payment of costs, we dismiss this appeal for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

 

190010F.P05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRIAN WEST, Appellant

No. 05-19-00010-CV V.

READY ROOFING AND RENOVATION, 

LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-01846-2018.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell, 

Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED for want 

of prosecution.

It is ORDERED that appellee READY ROOFING AND RENOVATION, LLC recover 

its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant BRIAN WEST.

Judgment entered this 26th day of April, 2019.
### Memorandum

**Subject:** Teleconference with Exide Technologies **Location:** U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , RTP, NC **Date:** November 21 , 2011 **Participants:** Nathan Topham , EPA

Steven Silverman, EPA Dean Rossi, Exide Jonathan Martel, Arnold and Porter representing Exide Russell Kemp, ENVIRON Donna Lazzari, ERG The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) met via telep hone with representatives of Exide Technologies . The meeting was held at Exide’s request to discuss issues the compan y believes to be the most important to address when finalizing the NESHAP for Secondary L ead. A brief summary

of the key

points that were discussed is outlined below. 1. Exide stated its position that the proposed requirements for enclosures for secondary lead smelters were overly

stringent and prescriptive. Specificall y Exide recommends specifications for the in

- draft velocity at enclosure openings be changed from a minimum of 300 feet per minute to a verification that there is in

- draft at the openings. Exide noted that the recently

published requirements for primary lead processing are less prescriptive than the proposed rules for secondary lead. 2. Exi de stated that the requirement to provide a battery back up on the negative pressure monitoring equipment for secondary lead enclosures is unnecessary and that multiple pressure monitors were not required for primary lead processing enclosures. 3. Exide als o commented on several of the fugitive emissions work practices that they believed would not significantly reduce fugitive emissions and did not warrant the burden imposed. Specificall y, the roof washing requirement and the wash water application rate for pavements were proposed with little or no justification. 4. Exide advised the EPA to revise the fugitive emission estimates based on comments received and encouraged the EPA to include in the preamble to the final rule a discussion of the fugitive emission s estimates

. 5. Exide noted several errors that were contained in the risk assessment analy sis. The compan y requested that these three issues be addressed b y the EPA.o The Exide Frisco dioxin data in the risk anal ys is was based on estimates prior to receivi ng actual test data from Exide. The estimates in the risk analysis were much higher than actual. o The maximum Arsenic inhalation concentrations are at a receptor inside the facility fenceline at Exide Frisco

. o The compan y objected to the addition of risk factors for receptors that are four miles apart. During the meeting the EPA inquired about the t est data from the Exide Reading facility for dioxins and furans that Exide had previously indicated would be completed in September. Exide had previousl y stated that they would forward this informatio n to EPA when it was available. Shortly after the meetin g, Exide submitted this test data.
#### SUCCESSION OF Eros Crosby CRAIN.

No. 87 CA 1198.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1987.

Sharon Haas Crain, Slidell, in pro per.

Joseph Bishop, Mandeville, for Sharon Haas Crain, defendant-appellant.

McNeil Kemmerly, Covington, for Rebecca Crain, defendant-appellee.

Before WATKINS, CARTER and FOIL, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We issued a rule to show cause ex pro-prio motu why we should not dismiss the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain as testamentary executrix and surviving spouse in community. That appeal was taken from a judgment allegedly granted in favor of Joseph Bishop, attorney at law, permitting Mr. Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

We have thoroughly examined the record and are unable to find a signed judgment permitting Joseph Bishop to withdraw as counsel of record for the executrix, Mrs. Crain.

An appeal can only be taken from a signed judgment of the trial court. LSA-C.C.P. art. 1911. As there is no signed judgment from which to appeal, the appeal of Sharon Haas Crain must be dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
**Exhibit 10.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statements No. 333-12254 and No. 333-10668 on Form F-3 of Repsol YPF, S.A. of our report dated March 30, 2006 except for the Notes 41, 42 and 43, as to which the date is July 12, 2006, appearing in thisAnnual report on Form 20-F of Repsol YPF, S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2005. Such report relates to the consolidated financial statements of Repsol YPF, S.A. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. Additionally,such report which expresses an unqualified opinion contains three explanatory paragraphs referring to the fact (1) that Repsol YPF, S.A. adopted EU-IFRS in preparing their consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and thatfor purposes of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company has developed accounting policies based on EU-IFRS issued to date that are effective at the Company’s reporting date ofDecember 31, 2005 as required by IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards, (2) that EU-IFRS vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America(“U.S. GAAP”), that the information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 42 to the consolidated financial statements of Repsol YPF, S.A. and (3) that on May 17, 2005 the Bolivian NationalCongress issued a new Hydrocarbons Law. On this new legal framework, the Bolivian government issued the Hydrocarbons Nationalization Supreme Decree 28701 that establishes several measures which are mentioned in Note 41 Subsequent Events of theconsolidated financial statements of Repsol YPF, S.A. 

DELOITTE, S.L. 

/s/     Deloitte, S.L. 

Madrid, Spain 

July 12, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000847388
<NAME>                        DIRECTCOM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         3,026,447         4,237,427
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,636,725         2,321,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                   188,218           121,171
<INVENTORY>                                    509,009           450,837
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,233,263         7,792,245
<PP&E>                                         9,572,672         7,464,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,199,205         1,462,118
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14,298,140        14,299,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,603,141         3,714,652
<BONDS>                                        0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 0
<COMMON>                                       34                34
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,061,781         3,295,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14,298,140        14,299,768
<SALES>                                        24,400,824        25,107,783
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,400,824        25,107,783
<CGS>                                          12,620,353        13,274,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  14,286,602        15,180,546
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,458,303         6,517,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               72,000            107,906
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             414,685           380,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,169,234         2,920,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,305,000         1,308,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,864,234         1,612,594
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                 0
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,766,451         1,382,110
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .57               .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .56               .44
                                                         

</TABLE>