alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,

July 9, 1970

Hon. J. W. Edgar Commissioner of Education 201 East 11th Street Austin, Texas

Dear Dr. Edgar: Opinion NO. M-658 Re: Whether trustees of an Independent SchoolDistrict have authority to adopt procedures for recall elections formembers of such board.
We are in receipt of your letter requesting an opinion in regard to the above statedquestion. We quote from your letter as follows:

"The Board of Trustees of an independent school district (WichitaFalls), recentlypresented with a resolution by localpatrons urging the Board to adopt and implementprocedures for recall elections for removal of trusteemembers of such school board, has requested me to submit to the Office ofAttorney General for an opinion the followingquestion: "Does the board of trustees of the Wichita Falls school districthave the power, expressed or implied, under common law or the statutes of Texas to adopt a resolution or policy providing procedures to effectpetition and recall elections of member(s) of its school board?" Trustees of independent school districts are ccnsidered "county officers" subject to the provisions of Section 24 of Article V of the Texas Constitution. Fowler v. Thomas, 275 S.W. 253 (Tex.Civ.App. 1925, err. dismd.).

-3149-. -

Hon. J. w. Edgar, Page 2 (M-658) .

Section 24 of Article V is quoted as follows: "CountyJudges, CountyAttorneys, clerks of the District and County Courts,Justices of the Peace, Constables, and other countyofficers, may be removed by the judges of the district courts for incompetency, official misconduct,habitual drunkenness, or other causes definedby law, upon the cause therefor being set forth inwriting and the finding of its truth by a jury." (Emphasisadded.) The above method and the statutes enacted pursuant thereto (Articles5970, et seq) of removingcounty officers from office are exclusive. Griver v. Thomas, 101Tex. 36, 104 S.W. 1058 (1907);State ex rel Downs v. Harvey, 164 S.W.2d 55 (Tex.Civ. APP. 1942, err. ref. w.0.m.); Jordanv. Crudqinoton, 149Tex. 237, 231 S.W.2d 641 (1950). In light of the above cited constitutionalprovision and the cases cited, it is our opinion hat the schoolboard has i- no authority to prescribe a method or removal of individual trusteesby recall or otherwisewhich may be inconsistentwith said constitutionalprovision or statutes. SUMMARY The Board of Trusteesof the Wichita Falls School Districthas no authority to adopt a resolution or policy providing for recall elections of i

General of Texas Preparedby James C. McCoy AssistantAttorney General

-3150-I

, I ,

Hon. J. W. Edgar, page 3

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, CO-Chairman Mitchell William6 Wardlow Lane Jerry Roberts Bob Giddings MEADE F. GRIFFIN Staff LegalAssistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant ALFRED WALKER FXecUtiVeASSiStant (M-658)

-3151-
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134182 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134182 COA: 274118 Kent CC: 04-008798-FH ANTHONY MICHAEL MOSS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1022 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 29, 2007

Clerk
Exhibit 4.11

    

    

    [FORM OF NOMINEE HOLDER ELECTION FORM]

    

    

    The undersigned, a bank, broker, trustee, depositary or other nominee of non-transferable subscription rights (the “Rights”) to purchase shares of common
      stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), of Condor Hospitality Trust, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to the rights offering (the “Rights Offering”) described and provided for in the Company’s prospectus dated                         ,
      2021 (the “Prospectus”), hereby certifies to the Company and to Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., as subscription agent for the Rights Offering (the “Subscription Agent”), that the undersigned has exercised, on behalf of the beneficial
      owners thereof (which may include the undersigned), on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Prospectus, the number of Rights specified below to purchase the number of shares of Common Stock specified below pursuant to the
      subscription right (as defined in the Prospectus).

    

    

    	
              1.

          
	 
	
              2.

          
	 
	
              3.

          
	 
	
              4.

          
	 
	
              5.

          
	 
	
              6.

          
	 
	
              7.

          
	 
	
              8.

          
	 
	
              9.

          
	 
	
              10.

          


    

    

    [Certification continues on the following page]

    
      
        


    

    Provide the following information, if applicable:

     

    

    	 	 	 
	
            Name of Nominee Holder

          	 	
            DTC Participant Number

          


    

    

    
      	
              By:

            	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
              DTC Subscription Confirmation Numbers

            


    

    
      	
              Name:

            	 	 


    

    

    

    
      	
              Title:

            	 	 


    

    

    

    
      	
              Phone Number:

            	 	 


    

    

    

    
      	
              Fax Number:

            	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
              Dated
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Franklin Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Gordon E. Inman, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
our knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

By: /s/ Gordon E. Inman
    -------------------
    Gordon E. Inman
    Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
    March 12, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 137 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 137

Recognizing, appreciating, and remembering with dignity and respect the 
  Native American men and women who have served the United States in 
                           military service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2000

  Mr. Levin submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing, appreciating, and remembering with dignity and respect the 
  Native American men and women who have served the United States in 
                           military service.

Whereas it is necessary to recognize, appreciate, assist, and remember the 
        Native American men and women who have served the United States in 
        military service;
Whereas Native American men and women have served the United States armed forces 
        in every military campaign since the American Revolutionary War;
Whereas some tribes, notably the Ottawa Nation, sent a special company of 
        warriors to serve in the Civil War with the Michigan Sharpshooters and 
        the Ottawa Warriors of Company K were highly decorated for their brave 
        actions in that military action;
Whereas some tribes, notably the Ottawa Nation, sent their finest warriors to 
        serve in the Spanish American War and one of their warriors 
        distinguished himself in the calvary with Teddy Roosevelt on San Juan 
        Hill;
Whereas some tribes, notably Ottawa, Chippewa, and Potawatomi answered the 
        warrior call from within and served in great numbers in World War I even 
        though they were not accepted as citizens of this country at that time;
Whereas the Navajo Code Talkers as well as other tribes, including the Ottawa 
        and Chippewa, used their sacred languages to assist our country in World 
        War II;
Whereas these sacred languages were also used to assist the United States 
        efforts in the Korean war and the Vietnam conflict during which Native 
        American veterans distinguished themselves with their bravery;
Whereas Native American veterans served in operations Desert Storm and Desert 
        Shield; and
Whereas Native Americans have served in the United States military in numbers 
        that far exceed their representation in the United States population: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress recognizes, appreciates, and remembers with dignity 
and respect the service to the United States of Native American 
veterans.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIALREPORT**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 to which this certificationis being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), and the Exchange Act.  Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date:  May 13, 2010** |                                                     |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ Dale B.  Herbst                                      |
|                         | Name: Dale B.  Herbst                                    |
|                         | Title: Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

1

----
#### Eleno M. MORFA, Appellant, v. BUENA VISTA LAKES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-1273.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Hershoff & Levy and Jay Levy, De-Cardenas & Freixas, Miami, for appellant.

Anthony Reinert and William T. Goran, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Schwartz v. Zippy Mart, Inc.,*470 So.2d 720 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *Johnson v. Gulf Life Insurance Company,*429 So.2d 744 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); *Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company,*266 So.2d 89 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); *Compare Wright v. Southern Bell Telephone Company,*605 F.2d 156 (5th Cir.1980).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 25, 1999 AND SUCH IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                          13,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  242,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,557
<INVENTORY>                                    132,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               465,366
<PP&E>                                         758,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 314,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,348,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          362,255
<BONDS>                                        884,550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           705
<OTHER-SE>                                   (151,826)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,348,890
<SALES>                                      1,898,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,898,597
<CGS>                                        1,613,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,807
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,502
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              92,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       246
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,365)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (8,850)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,215)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2080 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2080

       To suspend temporarily the duty on hand blown glass vases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on hand blown glass vases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HAND BLOWN GLASS VASES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Hand blown (but     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        not mechanically                                                   31/2011.......
                        pressed) glass
                        vases, valued at
                        more than $3 but
                        not more than $5
                        each (provided
                        for in subheading
                        7013.99.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31,1998 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,126
<PP&E>                                       3,289,433
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,690,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 653,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              645
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     652,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   653,559
<SALES>                                        704,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               707,744
<CGS>                                          488,647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  488,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               212,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,584
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,584
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)
        

</TABLE>
PAA--20JD- 01'7~

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 11Ybl if1 --

Regional Airline Association Da\'e Loiterer 11)/1 bq ~

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1~ iI ---

ATA Craig Fabian q,'}~Jrf1 --
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Presstek, Inc.
Hudson, New Hampshire

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective
Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos.
33-80466, 33-61215 and 33-39337) and on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-2299 and 33-48342),
of our report dated February 21, 1997 (except for Note 11 as to which the date
is March 26, 1997), relating to the financial statements and schedule of
Presstek, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 28, 1996.

We also consent to the references to us under the caption "Experts" in the
Prospectuses.

/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

New York, New York
March 27, 1997
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent ,

v.
NICHOLAS ADAM IVESDAL , Petitioner

. No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0435 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County

No. S8015CR201300111 The Honorable Richard D. Lambert , Judge REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL Mohave County Attorney's Office , Kingman By Matthew J. Smith Counsel for Respondent

Nicholas Adam Ivesdal , Kingman Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Judge Paul J. McMurdie and Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court. FILED 8-21-2018STATE v. IVESDAL Decision of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : ¶1 Petitioner Nicholas Adam Ivesdal seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's first petition. ¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for po st

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review). ¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion. ¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.