alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 118

Designating December 12, 1999, as ‘‘National Children’s Memorial Day’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 14, 1999

Mr. REID (for himself, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. BYRD, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. DODD, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

TORRICELLI, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. NICKLES, Mr. CRAIG,

Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, and Mr. ABRAHAM) submitted

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Designating December 12, 1999, as ‘‘National Children’s

Memorial Day’’.

Whereas approximately 80,000 infants, children, teenagers,

and young adults of families living throughout the United

States die each year from myriad causes;

Whereas the death of an infant, child, teenager, or young

adult of a family is considered to be 1 of the greatest

tragedies that a parent or family will ever endure during

a lifetime; and

Whereas a supportive environment and empathy and understanding are considered critical factors in the healing

process of a family that is coping with and recovering

from the loss of a loved one: Now, therefore, be it
2

•SRES 118 IS

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL CHILDREN’S ME3 MORIAL DAY.

4 The Senate—

5 (1) designates December 12, 1999, as ‘‘Na6 tional Children’s Memorial Day’’; and

7 (2) requests that the President issue a procla8 mation calling upon the people of the United States

9 to observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and

10 activities in remembrance of the many infants, chil11 dren, teenagers, and young adults of families in the

12 United States who have died.

Æ
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 27

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment (normal trade

relations treatment) to the products of the People’s Republic of China.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 7, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire introduced the following joint resolution; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

JOINT RESOLUTION

Disapproving the extension of nondiscriminatory treatment

(normal trade relations treatment) to the products of

the People’s Republic of China.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress does not approve the extension of the

4 authority contained in section 402(c) of the Trade Act of

5 1974 recommended by the President to the Congress on

6 June 3, 1999, with respect to the People’s Republic of

7 China.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer ofWII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2008 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.  This certification is providedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 
| **Date: August 14, 2008** |                                                    |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | /s/ Dale B. Herbst                                      |
|                           | Name: Dale B. Herbst                                    |
|                           | Title: Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and the Statement of Operations for the
Year Ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,489
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,025
<PP&E>                                       3,286,714
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,356,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,092,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,092,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,092,739
<SALES>                                        414,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               418,342
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               152,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                266,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            266,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   266,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    23.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    23.71
        

</TABLE>
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 20

- 61221 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Michael Wayne Hanzik, Jr.,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:15

- CR

- 33

- 1

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : * Michael Wayne Hanzik, Jr., federal prisoner # 18297

- 043 , appeals the denial of his motion for compassionate release filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Hanzik argues that the district court erred by finding he
failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, by failing to consider all of his

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent excep t under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 25, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-61221 Document: 00516067697 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2021No. 20

- 61221

2 arguments for granting relief, by failing to adequately explain its decision, by failing to properly balanc e the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and by considering U.S.S.G. § 1B1.13, p.s.

We review a district court ’ s denial of a prisoner ’ s § 3582(c)(1)(A)
motion for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Chambliss , 948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020). Because Han zik himself filed the instant motion , the district court’s ruling was “bound only by § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) and . . . the sentencing factors in § 3553(a).” United States v. Shkambi , 993 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir. 2021)

. In the instant case, we need not address t he district court ’ s conclusion
that Hanzik failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because it alternatively concluded that Hanzik ’ s motion failed on its merits. The
district court considered all of Hanzik ’ s arguments and found that, even if
Hanzik h ad demonstrated an extraordinary and compelling reason to grant his motion, it should be denied based on the sentencing factors of § 3553(a). Thus, the court’s ruling provide d “specific factual reasons” for its decision
and reflect ed consideration of Hanz ik ’s motion, the record, and the § 3553(a)
factors. See Chambliss , 948 F.3d at 693. Hanzik ’ s disagreement with the
district court ’ s balanc ing of the § 3553(a) sentencing factors is not sufficient
to demonstrate that the district court abused its discreti on. See id. at 694.
Finally, although the district court briefly discussed the policy statement and commentary found at U.S.S.G. § 1B.13, p.s. , there is no
indication that the court considered itself bound by § 1B1.13. Cf. Shkambi , 993 F.3d at 393

. Accordingly, the district court ’ s order is AFFIRMED

. Case: 20-61221 Document: 00516067697 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2021
#### Anita BORDELON, et al. v. Michael JACKSON, et al.

No. 86-C-2502.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Ducote, Anita Bordelon; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5157; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 83-10010.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 392.

Not considered. The application was not timely, and the judgment is definitive. La. C.C.P. art. 2166.
#### AAA SOD, INC., a Florida corporation, Cross Appellant, v. WEITZER CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, and Harry Weitzer, Cross Appellee. WEITZER ENTERPRISES NO. 4, INC., Weitzer Moon Lake, Ltd., Weitzer Communities Ltd., and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. AAA SOD, INC., a Florida corporation, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

Nos. 4-86-1018, 4-86-2063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Victor K. Rones of Margulies & Rones, P.A., North Miami Beach, for Weitzer.

Val L. Osinski of Law Offices of Val L. Osinski, Coral Springs, for AAA Sod, Inc., a Florida corporation.

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by an owner and surety from a final judgment and a cross appeal by the contractor. Having relinquished jurisdiction for the purpose of obtaining findings of fact, in order to effect an informed decision, we also obtained supplemental briefs thereafter — all of which have eliminated the previous uncertainty and have enabled us to reach this decision.

We hold that the trial court did not err in entering judgment for the contractor against the owner, the contractor’s complaint having also sought relief not based upon the contractor’s claim of lien; and we affirm to that extent.

However, we must reverse the judgment on the bond against the transferee surety. In its original brief, the surety mentioned only cursorily that there were technical barriers to the judgment. Its supplemental brief amplifies, albeit with the same reference to the record as originally, that it was error not to direct a verdict upon the count of the contractor’s complaint which sought to foreclose a claim of lien because there was no proof of the *751contractor’s furnishing the final payment affidavit. We agree. *See Atlantic Gardens Landscaping, Inc. v. Boca Raton Land Development, Inc.,*360 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), and *Antonelli Construction Company v. Sanfilippo,*449 So.2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). Section 713.06(3)(d)(1), Florida Statutes (1985), requires same of a contractor having one or more subcontractors which are providing, as here, some of the services or materials. The plaintiff in this case had an irrigation subcontractor on the job because plaintiff was not licensed to do that part of the work.

Another effect of the above reversal is upon the question of attorney’s fees. It can be seen from our conclusions that the only party entitled to them under section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1985) is the surety as it has prevailed upon the mechanics’ lien count.

The contractor is not entitled to attorney’s fees against the owner as none of the exhibits attached to its complaint show any contractual basis therefor. Similarly, the owner is not entitled to attorney’s fees against the contractor, although it prevailed in defense of the claim based on a lien, because the contractor successfully obtained a money judgment on its other theory. *See Schabert v. Montaltos,*445 So.2d 1136 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
# Eiropas Savienības C 57I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 057I |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 63. gadagājums2020. gada 20. februāris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 057I

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

63. gadagājums2020. gada 20. februāris

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Padome |
| 2020/C 57 I/01 | Padomes Lēmums (2020. gada 17. februārī), ar ko ieceļ Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekli no Vācijas | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

Padome

2020/C 57 I/01

Padomes Lēmums (2020. gada 17. februārī), ar ko ieceļ Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekli no Vācijas

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Padome

| 20.2.2020 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CI 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CI 57/1

---

PADOMES LĒMUMS

(2020. gada 17. februārī),

ar ko ieceļ Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekli no Vācijas

(2020/C 57 I/01)

EIROPAS SAVIENĪBAS PADOME,

ņemot vērā Līgumu par Eiropas Savienības darbību,

ņemot vērā Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 1922/2006 par Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta izveidi (1) un jo īpaši tās 10. pantu,

ņemot vērā kandidātu sarakstus, ko Padomei iesniegušas dalībvalstu valdības,

tā kā:

| (1) | Padome ar 2019. gada 27. maija lēmumu (2) ir iecēlusi Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekļus un viņu vietniekus uz laikposmu no 2019. gada 1. jūnija līdz 2022. gada 31. maijam. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Padome ar 2019. gada 27. maija lēmumu (2) ir iecēlusi Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekļus un viņu vietniekus uz laikposmu no 2019. gada 1. jūnija līdz 2022. gada 31. maijam.

| (2) | Vācijas valdība ir izvirzījusi vienu kandidātu brīvajai amata vietai, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Vācijas valdība ir izvirzījusi vienu kandidātu brīvajai amata vietai,

IR PIEŅĒMUSI ŠO LĒMUMU.

1. pants

Ar šo uz atlikušo pilnvaru laiku, proti, līdz 2022. gada 31. maijam, par Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekli no Vācijas tiek iecelts:

VALDĪBU PĀRSTĀVJI

| Valsts | Loceklis | Locekļa vietnieks |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vācija | Daniela BEHRENS kundze | |

Valsts

Loceklis

Locekļa vietnieks

Vācija

Daniela BEHRENS kundze

2. pants

Šis lēmums stājas spēkā tā pieņemšanas dienā.

Briselē, 2020. gada 17. februārī.,

Padomes vārdā —

priekšsēdētājs

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  OV L 403, 30.12.2006., 9. lpp.

1

(2)  Padomes Lēmums (2019. gada 27. maijs), ar ko ieceļ Eiropas Dzimumu līdztiesības institūta valdes locekļus un viņu vietniekus (OV C 185, 29.5.2019., 1. lpp.).

2

---
1 A tt ac h m e n t

H i R oge rI ’ v e a t t a c hed an e l e c t r on i c c op y o f t h e B A

. I w ill a l s o s en d a ha r d c op y t o y o u v i a F ed

- X t o da y.

T h an k s,

L i n c o l n H u l se

N a t u r a l R e s ou r c e s D i v i s i on M anag e r

U R S C o r po r a t i on

2 020 E a s t 1 s t St r ee t

, S u i t e 4 00

S a n t a A na

, C A 927 05

P h o ne 714

- 6 48

- 2 824

F a x 714

- 4 33

- 7 701

M o b il e 7 1 4

- 2 2 7

- 1 992

Fr o m: K o hn .R o g e r @ e p a m a i l

. e p a

. g ov [ m a i l t o : K o hn .R o g e r @ e p a m a i l

. e p a

. g ov ]

S e n t: M o n d a y, D e c

e m b e r 05

, 201 1 10 : 1 5 A M

T o: H u l s e

, L i nc

o l n

S u bj e c t: P i o P i c

o BA

L i n c o l n,

W e r e c e i v ed t h e B i o l og i c a l A ss e ss m e n t f o r t he P i o P i c o E ne r g y C en t e r o n D e c 1

. W on d e r i ng i f y ou c ou l d s en d

m e an o t he r ha r d c op y and an e l e c t r o n i c c o p y ? T h a t w ou l d m a k e i t e a s i e r f o r u s t o i n c l ud e a c op y w hen w e

c o n s u l t w i t h U S F W S

, an d po s t a n e l e c t r o n i c c o p y i n ou r do ck e t

.

R E : P i o P i c o B A

H u l s e

, L i n c o l n

t o :

R og e r K oh n

12 / 05 / 2011 02 : 12 P M

C c :

" F it z g e r a l d

, M a gg i e "

H i d e D e t a i l s

F r o m: " H u l s e

, L i n c o l n " < li n c o l n

. h u l s e @u r s

. c o m>

T o : R og e r K ohn / R 9 / U S E P A / U S @ E P A

, C c : " F i t z g e r a l d

, M a gg i e " < m a gg i e

. f it z g e r a l d@u r s. c o m>

H i s t o r y : T h i s m e s s a g e h a s b e e n r e p li e d t o a nd f o r w a r d e d.

P i o P i c o D r a f

t B i o l og i c a l A ss e ss m e n t 29 N ov 2 011_ F i n a l

. pdf

T h i s e

- m a i l an d a n y a t t a c h m en t s c o n t a i n U R S Co

r p o r a t i on c o n f i d e n t i a l i n f o r m a t i on t h a t m a y be

p r op r i e t a r y o r p r i v il eg e d

. I f y o u r e c e i v e t h i s m e s s age i n e rr o r o r a r e no t t h e i n t en d ed r e c i p i en t

, y o u s hou l d

n o t r e t a i n

, d i s t r i b u t e

, d i s c l o s e o r u s e an y o f t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a n d y ou sh ou l d de s t r o y t h e e

- m a i l an d a n y

a t t a c h m en t s o r c o p i e s. P a g e 1 o f 2

2 / 8 / 2012 f il e :// C :\ D o c u m e n t s a nd S e tti ng s \ r kohn \ L o c a l S e tti ng s \ T e m p \ no t e s D F 63 F 8 \

~ w e b0515

. h tmT han k y ou.

R oge r K o hn

U S EPA R e g i on 9

- A i r D i v i s i o n ( A I R

- 3 )

75 H a w t h o r ne S t r ee t

S a n F r an c i sc o

, C A 94 1 05

- 390 1

41 5

- 97 2

- 3973

k o hn

. r o ge r@ epa P a g e 2 o f 2

2 / 8 / 2012 f il e :// C :\ D o c u m e n t s a nd S e tti ng s \ r kohn \ L o c a l S e tti ng s \ T e m p \ no t e s D F 63 F 8 \

~ w e b0515

. h tm
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING
OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT





I,
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby
certify that:





(1)  I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Rotoblock Corporation;





(2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;





(4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and





(5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.





Dated: December
12,
2008 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION





/s/
Richard Di Stefano


By:
Richard Di Stefano, Chief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
#### Sara MAURELLO v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN RESOURCES, OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & FINANCE.

No. 87-C-2135.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Health & Human Res. Dept.; Civil Service Dept./La.; applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA85 0130; State Civil Service Commission No. 3920.

Prior report: La.App., 510 So.2d 458.

Denied.