alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## CANNON RESOURCES, LLC

3863 Spinach Creek Rd. Fairbanks, AK 99709 907-374-9799

May 21, 2014

Docket Management Facility U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140 Washington, D.C. 20590

Reference: No. FAA-2014-0107

To Whom It May Concern: We are writing in support of the Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107, wherein the Petitioner, Everts Air, seeks relief from certain requirements of inter alia §121.436 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. The recently enacted regulation requires co-pilots (second in command) hire d or promoted to th at position after 31 July 2013 to be certified as captains (pilot in command) with respect to the aircraft type rating. This regulation will also require all pilots serving as second in command to be certified in this manner after 01 January 2016.

The petitioner, Tatonduk Outfitters, Ltd., d/b/a Everts Air pr ovides essential services in a unique environment. There are no simulator training devices for several of the aircraft they operate, including the DC-6 and C-46. Thus, all training must be conducted in the airplanes, in f light. It is noteworthy that Everts Air does not seek relief from the requirement that all pilots must possess airline transport licenses.

This mandate will not result in an increas ed level of safety, rather a lower sta ndard of safety as the more critical and technically demanding captain’s maneuvers will now be required of the second in command candidate. Historically, training in aircraft rather than simulators has pr oven dangerous, particularly in training lesser experienced pilots in emergency and abnormal procedures and ma neuvers. This element represents an increased risk.

When this rule was promulgated by Congress, there was an assumption made that all airline training was accomplished in a simulator. The simulator represents a safe an d relatively low cost training environment. The cost of training a pilot in a flight simulator is on the order of $14,000.00. The cost of training the same pilot for the type rating course in the airplane is nearly ten times that, and re presents a cost that Everts Air will have to pass along to

us as the customer.

We are deeply concerned that this cost will drive the petitioner to withdraw from several markets, leaving noncertificated and/or fewer safe operators. Their alternativ e is to increase the cost, maki ng arctic operations impractical for industry, including aviation, thus increasing the cost of living in rural communities.

The §121 air carrier has proven to be the safest supply chain for business, industry and residential needs in outlying areas. We agree with the petitioner’s position that traini ng to the level that was in place before the enactment of 14 CFR 121.436 represents continued service at the highest standard of safety.

In the interest of air safety and viable logistics options for rural communities, we are in favor of supporting the Petition for Exemption, Docket Number FAA-2014-0107.

Sincerely,

Philip Kib Cannon Cannon Resources, LLC

kib@cannonresources.com

907-978-4757
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 118 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 118

Designating December 12, 1999, as ``National Children's Memorial Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 1999

Mr. Reid (for himself, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Byrd, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
    Inouye, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Helms, Mr. 
  Torricelli, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
   Smith of Oregon, Mr. Rockefeller, Mr. Abraham, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
Breaux, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Cleland, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Hagel, Mr. 
Mack, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Kohl, Mr. 
  Kerrey, Mr. Hollings, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Voinovich, Mr. Domenici, Mr. 
  Levin, Mr. Robb, Mr. Bayh, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
   Lautenberg, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Enzi, Mr. Burns, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
   Johnson, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Bunning, Mr. 
Roberts, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Roth, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Biden, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
  Sarbanes Mr. Fitzgerald, and Mrs. Lincoln) submitted the following 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                            November 4, 1999

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

                           November 19, 1999

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Designating December 12, 1999, as ``National Children's Memorial Day''.

Whereas approximately 80,000 infants, children, teenagers, and young adults of 
        families living throughout the United States die each year from myriad 
        causes;
Whereas the death of an infant, child, teenager, or young adult of a family is 
        considered to be 1 of the greatest tragedies that a parent or family 
        will ever endure during a lifetime; and
Whereas a supportive environment and empathy and understanding are considered 
        critical factors in the healing process of a family that is coping with 
        and recovering from the loss of a loved one: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL DAY.

    The Senate--
            (1) designates December 12, 1999, as ``National Children's 
        Memorial Day''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling upon the people of the United States to observe the day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities in remembrance of 
        the many infants, children, teenagers, and young adults of 
        families in the United States who have died.
                                 <all>
```
exh102






          EXHIBIT 10.2  December 2020    ____________  ____________    Dear _________,     It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2021 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program  with a target incentive amount equal to $ __________ (the “Target Amount”).     In 2021 we need to continue to drive our digital investments supporting our clients wherever they may live or work and  however they may choose to transact with Knoll and our constellation of design driven brands. With a vaccine on the  horizon we also need to partner with our commercial clients as they prepare to return to work, helping them to envision  what the new workplace will look like.     As leaders we must continue to guide our teams through these challenging times providing the support and direction  needed to grow our business, protect our profitability and deliver on both our financial plan and our corporate social  responsibility goals.     Your 2021 incentive payout will be based on your achievement of your individual goals and Knoll’s achievement of its  2021 EBITDA plan as follows:     SHORT TERM INCENTIVE  2021 Management Incentive Target:      $ _____________    -If Knoll achieves at least eighty percent (80%) of its 2021 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive  payout of fifty percent (50%) of your Target.     -If Knoll achieves at least ninety percent (90%) of its 2021 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target incentive  payout of ninety percent (90%) of your Target.     -If Knoll achieves at least one hundred percent (100%) of its 2021 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total target  incentive payout of one hundred percent (100%) of your Target.     -If Knoll achieves at least one hundred twenty percent (120%) of its 2021 EBITDA plan, you will qualify for a total  target incentive payout of one hundred twenty percent (120%) of your Target.     This award is subject to the approval of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc.  Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of  Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll’s  performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance but such award  cannot exceed one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the target amount in any event. You must be employed by Knoll on  the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.     I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2021 and look forward to the opportunity to present  you with your award in early 2022. Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.     Sincerely,         _____________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         280,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     280,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   280,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### John JABBIA, Sr. v. Carl D. SANDERS, et al.

No. 86-C-2199.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 12, 1986.

In re Jabbia, John Sr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-1049; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 54584.

*199Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 1070.

Denied. Result correct.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
#### In the Interest of the Minor Child Justin Scott MARTINEZ.

No. 88-C-2407.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 28, 1988.

In re Brown, Robin; — Other(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number CW88 1356; Parish of East Baton Rouge Family Court Parish of East Baton Rouge Number 82,344 C.

Granted. No statute has been declared unconstitutional. Case transferred to the *970court of appeal for its consideration of relator’s application for writs.

WATSON, J., concurs and assigns reasons.

WATSON, Justice,

concurs in the transfer and assigns the following reasons.

The trial court relied heavily on *State v.*Rowell1 in protecting the alleged father of the minor from a blood test to determine paternity. *Rowell*decided that the regulations pertaining to blood alcohol tests do not provide sufficient assurance of accuracy to support a presumption of intoxication in a criminal proceeding. Although the admissibility of this blood test in a criminal proceeding was not at issue, the trial court here made an inappropriate analogy to the unstable testing involved in *Rowell,*supra. An unreliable chemical test used as evidence in a criminal prosecution cannot be equated with a stable blood test facilitating a civil decision on paternity.

*Dept, of Social Services v. Thomas J.S.,*100 A.D.2d 119, 474 N.Y.S.2d 322 (1984), held a similar law to be valid and noted that paternity statutes date back to the Elizabethan Poor Law of 1576. Courts have always recognized a strong public interest in assuring support of children by their parents rather than the community or state.

The trial court’s reasons for judgment stress the financial responsibilities accompanying fatherhood and the putative father’s property interests. The trial court erred in placing the alleged father’s property interests above the state’s interest in securing support for minor children.

1

. 517 So.2d 799 (La.1988).
#### John KIRK, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. *Jenkins v. State,*444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); *Dilla v. State,*508 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 206

Relative to the death of the Honorable John H. Chafee, of Rhode Island.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 25, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. REED, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. BYRD,

Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. ROTH,

Mr. HELMS, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SARBANES,

Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. LUGAR, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. COCHRAN,

Mr. WARNER, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DODD, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. SPECTER, Mr.

NICKLES, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr.

KERRY, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. ROCKEFELLER,

Mr. BREAUX, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. REID, Mr.

GRAHAM, Mr. BOND, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. GORTON, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

BRYAN, Mr. MACK, Mr. KERREY, Mr. ROBB, Mr. BURNS, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, Mr. CRAIG, Mr.

WELLSTONE, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. DORGAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. GREGG,

Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr.

BENNETT, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. THOMPSON, Ms. SNOWE,

Mr. DEWINE, Mr. KYL, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. GRAMS, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. FRIST, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. BROWNBACK,

Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. CLELAND, Ms. LANDRIEU, Mr. SESSIONS,

Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. HAGEL, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. ENZI, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. CRAPO, Mrs. LINCOLN, Mr. BAYH, Mr.

VOINOVICH, Mr. FITZGERALD, and Mr. EDWARDS) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Relative to the death of the Honorable John H. Chafee,

of Rhode Island.
2

SRES 206 ATS

1 Resolved, That the Senate has heard with profound

2 sorrow and deep regret the announcement of the death

3 of the Honorable John H. Chafee, a Senator from the

4 State of Rhode Island.

5 Resolved, That Senator Chafee’s record of public serv6 ice embodied the best traditions of the Senate: Statesman7 ship, Comity, Tolerance, and Decency.

8 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate commu9 nicate these resolutions to the House of Representatives

10 and transmit an enrolled copy thereof to the family of the

11 deceased.

12 Resolved, That when the Senate adjourns today, it

13 stand adjourned as a further mark of respect to the mem14 ory of the deceased Senator.

Æ
#### Abhimanyu SWAIN v. Delores Jan Swain STEVENS.

No. 92-CA-0972.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 9, 1993.

Appeal No. 32415 from Judgment dated Aug. 20, 1992, Gerald E. Braddock, Ruling Judge; Warren County Chancery Court.

*1386Travis T. Vance, Jr., Vicksburg, for appellant.

Kay S. Beene, J. Mack Varner, Varner Parker Sessums & Akin, Vicksburg, for ap-pellee.

Before HAWKINS, C.J., and SULLIVAN and SMITH, JJ.

Affirmed.
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA-0481

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF

ROBYN M. RYERSON, 

n/k/a ROBYN R. MADISON, 

 Petitioner/Appellee, 

-vsPATRICK S. RYERSON, 

 Respondent/Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent/Appellant have an additional 

30 days to file his Opening Brief.

Electronically dated and filed below. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 30 2021

11/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0481
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16217-16218]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6633]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1781-001.
    Applicants: Northern Indiana Public Service Company.
    Description: Amendment to Triennial Updated Market Power Analysis 
Filing Letter of Northern Indiana Public Service Company.
    Filed Date: 3/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120312-5240.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3322-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Compliance Filing per the February 24, 2012 Order in 
Docket ER11-3322-001 to be effective 11/7/2011.
    Filed Date: 3/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120312-5236.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4272-003.
    Applicants: ITC Midwest LLC.
    Description: Filing of a Compliance Filing to be effective 10/10/
2011.
    Filed Date: 3/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120312-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1244-000.
    Applicants: RLD Resources, LLC.
    Description: RLD Resources MBR Tariff Filing to be effective 3/26/
2012.
    Filed Date: 3/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120312-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1245-000.
    Applicants: Interstate Power and Light Company.
    Description: Amended IPL & ITC Operations Services Agreement to be 
effective 1/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 3/12/12.
    Accession Number: 20120312-5191.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/2/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing

[[Page 16218]]

requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6633 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
250’ dp-2 OSV Gulf Tiger

Gulf Fleet Holdings

2623 SE Evangeline Thwy Lafayette, LA 70508 • P.O. Box 80707 Lafayette, LA 70598-0707

Office 337-210-2600 • Fax 337-210-1648 • Toll Free 866-857-9900

Gulf Tiger

gulffleet.com

MAIN PARTICULARS

Length Overall 250 ft 76.2 m

Beam 54 ft 16.46 m

Depth 17 ft 5.18 m

Light Draft TBD

Loaded Draft TBD

Lightship TBD

Displacement TBD

CAPACITIES

Ballast/Drill Water 117,000 USG 442.85 m3

Fuel 180,000 USG 681.3 m3

Potable Water 83,000 USG 314.16 m3

Bulk Mud 6,000 ft3 169.92 m3

Liquid Mud 8,500 Bbls 1351.25 m3

CARGO DECK

Tonnage TBD

Length 171 ft 52.12 m

Width 41 ft 12.5 m

Clear Deck 7011 ft2 651.32 m2

TONNAGE

GRT TBD

NRT TBD

MACHINERY

Main Engines (2) Caterpillar 3516 @ 2100 BHP

Z-Drives (2) Lips/Wartsila FS225-S/BN-K

360° Azmuthing Thruster

Gensets (2) Caterpillar C-18 @ 425 KW

Emergency Genset (1) Caterpillar C-4.4 @ 99 KW

Bow Thrusters (2) Lips/Wartsila CT175 CPP

Bow Thruster Engines (2) CaterpillarC-32 @ 750 BHP

Liquid Mud Pumps (2) 200 HP Mission Magnum 

6x4x14

Circulating Pumps (3) 40 HP Mission Magnum 

4x3x12

Bulk Compressor Quincy QSF-150, 100 PSI @ 150 HP

PERFORMANCE

Maximum Speed 12 Knots

Cruising Speed 10 Knots

Maximum Fuel Consumption 200 USG/Hr. 18.16 m3/Day

Cruising Fuel Consumption 135 USG/Hr. 12.26 m3/Day

discharge rates gpm @ ft m3/min @ m

Ballast/Drill Water 400 280 1.51 85.3

Fuel 400 280 1.51 85.3

Liquid Mud 700 240 2.65 73.15

Potable Water 400 280 1.51 85.3

Dry bulk ft3 @ ft m3/HR @ m

Dry Bulk 735 100 20.82 30

ACCOMODATIONS

Cabins/Berths 13/36

Mess 10

Lounge 1

Heads 7

ELECTRONICS

Radar (2) Furuno FR-8122

GPS Furuno GP-37

SSB Furuno FS-1503 

VHF (2) Furuno FM-8800S

AIS Furuno FA-150

Depth Sounder Furuno FE-700

GMDSS Furuno RC-1815

Dynamic Positioning MT Electronics DP-2 + JX

E-mail & Communications Advanced Logistics SAMM

system (Iridium)

DOCUMENTATION

Class USCG Subchapter “L”; ABS 

 Classed +AMS, +A1, +DPS-2, 

 Circle E; S.O.L.A.S.

Flag United States

Official Number TBD

Class Number TBD

Year Built/Re-Built 2009

Builder Thoma-Sea Shipyard

 Houma, LA

NOTICE: The data contained herein is provided for convenience of 

reference to allow users to determine the suitability of the Company’s 

equipment. The data may vary from the current condition of equipment which can only be determined by physical inspection. Company 

has exercised due diligence to insure that the data contained herein 

is reasonably accurate. However, Company does not warrant the 

accuracy completeness of the data. In no event shall Company be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out

of the use inability to use the data contained herein.
250’ dp-2 OSV Gulf Tiger

Gulf Fleet Holdings

2623 SE Evangeline Thwy Lafayette, LA 70508 • P.O. Box 80707 Lafayette, LA 70598-0707

Office 337-210-2600 • Fax 337-210-1648 • Toll Free 866-857-9900

Gulf Tiger

gulffleet.com