alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended May 26, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven D. Hunt, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Steven D. Hunt                      |
|     |  | Steven D. Hunt*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 10, 2007
Exhibit 24



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-148594) of Zynex, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2016 on the December
31, 2015 consolidated financial statements of Zynex, Inc., (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern), which appears on page F-1 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.



|/s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.
|---------------------
|Denver, Colorado     
|                     
|April 17, 2017
#### Mrs. June F. CONWAY, et al. v. Gary M. COUVILLION, et al.

No. 88-C-0157.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Conway, June F., Mrs.; Ligi, Anita F.; Meredith, Marilyn; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1574; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 283405.

Denied.
Exhibit 23.02




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement
of New Frontier Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8 (File No. 333-102694)
of our report, dated May 18, 2001, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of New Frontier Media, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended March 31, 2003.

/s/ SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP
--------------------------------------------
SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
June 27, 2003
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 24

Conferring status as an honorary veteran of the United States Armed Forces

on Zachary Fisher.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 30, 1999

Mr. CLELAND (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

JOINT RESOLUTION

Conferring status as an honorary veteran of the United

States Armed Forces on Zachary Fisher.

Whereas the United States has only once before conferred on

an individual status as an honorary veteran of the United

States Armed Forces, when in Public Law 105–67 Congress conferred that status on Leslie Townes (Bob)

Hope;

Whereas status as an honorary veteran of the United States

Armed Forces is and should remain an extraordinary

honor not lightly conferred nor frequently granted;

Whereas the lifetime of accomplishments and generosity of

Zachary Fisher on behalf of United States military

servicemembers, veterans, and their families through a
2

•SJ 24 IS

wide range of philanthropic activities fully justifies the

conferring of such status;

Whereas Zachary Fisher is himself not a veteran, having attempted to enlist in the Armed Forces to serve his country during World War II, but being informed that he was

ineligible due to a preexisting medical condition;

Whereas Zachary Fisher and his wife Elizabeth have as private citizens enhanced the lives of thousands of

servicemembers, veterans, and their families through a

wide range of philanthropic activities;

Whereas Zachary Fisher has been honored by each of the

branches of the Armed Forces, by the Departments of

Defense and Veterans Affairs, and by the major veterans

service organizations for projects such as the preservation

of the USS INTREPID as a sea-air-space museum in

New York harbor, the establishment of the Fisher House

program for relatives of critically ill members of the

Armed Forces and their families, and the furnishing of

scholarships and other financial support to families who

have lost a loved one in service to their country; and

Whereas Zachary Fisher has been awarded the Presidential

Medal of Freedom in recognition of his extraordinary patriotism and philanthropy: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress—

4 (1) extends its gratitude, on behalf of the

5 American people, to Zachary Fisher for his lifetime

6 of accomplishments and philanthropy on behalf of

7 United States military servicemembers; and
3

•SJ 24 IS

1 (2) confers upon Zachary Fisher the status of

2 an honorary veteran of the United States Armed

3 Forces.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 18879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation


Department of Transportation Final Environmental Justice Strategy

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary of Transportation, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is issuing a revised 
environmental justice strategy, which sets forth DOT's commitment to 
identifying and addressing disproportionately high and adverse human 
health and environmental effects of agency policies and activities on 
minority and low-income populations. This strategy is published as a 
final document; however, it is a revision of a previous version 
published in 1995, and may be adjusted periodically in the future to 
reflect new insights acquired through implementation and changing 
social and technological conditions.
    The strategy has been revised in response to an interagency 
Memorandum of Understanding on Environmental Justice (EJ MOU), 
confirming the importance of addressing environmental justice 
considerations in agency programs, policies, and activities. The 
strategy identifies actions the Department intends to take to implement 
Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'', signed by 
President Clinton on February 11, 1994. This Executive Order directs 
agencies to identify and address disproportionately high and adverse 
impacts on minority and low-income populations with respect to human 
health and environment. The EJ MOU acknowledges the continued 
importance of EJ and participating Federal agencies pledged to review 
and update existing EJ strategies. This updated EJ strategy reflects 
DOT's continued commitment to EJ principles and to integrating those 
principles into DOT programs, policies, and activities.
    The revised strategy is publicly available on the DOT Web site at: 
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/dot_ej_strategy/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Higgins, Office of Safety, 
Energy, and Environment, Office of the Assistant Secretary for 
Transportation Policy, telephone (202) 366-7098, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9fdad5dffbf0ebb1f8f0e9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a5f505a7e756e347d756c">[email protected]</span></a>, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington DC 
20590.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 2nd day of March 2012.
Ray LaHood,
Secretary, Department of Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2012-7296 Filed 3-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 164

Congratulating the Black Bears of the University of Maine for winning

the 1999 NCAA hockey championship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 1999

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Ms. COLLINS) submitted the following resolution;

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 29, 1999

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Black Bears of the University of Maine

for winning the 1999 NCAA hockey championship.

Whereas the Black Bears of the University of Maine defeated

the Wildcats of the University of New Hampshire by a

score of 3 to 2 in overtime in Anaheim, California, on

April 3, 1999, to win the 1999 NCAA hockey championship;

Whereas the Maine Black Bears finished their season with an

impressive record of 31–6–4, losing only 1 game at home;

Whereas the Maine Black Bears have brought the NCAA

hockey championship home to Maine for the 2d time this

decade;
2

SRES 164 ATS

Whereas the Maine Black Bears coaching staff and players

displayed outstanding dedication, teamwork, and sportsmanship throughout the season to achieve collegiate

hockey’s highest honor; and

Whereas the Maine Black Bears have brought pride and

honor to the State of Maine: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate congratulates the Black

2 Bears of the University of Maine for winning the 1999

3 NCAA hockey championship.

4 SEC. 2. The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit

5 a copy of this resolution to the president of the University

6 of Maine.

Æ
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Medina, Dayana

Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:17 AM

To: Pettyjohn, Mary

Cc: Donaldson, Guy; Feldman, Michael

Subject: Region 6 Response on AEP Flint Creek 

Hi Mary,  

Thank you for forwarding the email from AEP/SWEPCO last week. Here is Region 6’s response to the comments from

AEP/SWEPCO regarding Flint Creek. Let me know if you would like to discuss.

SO2 Control Efficiency

Thank you for the explanation that in the testimony before the Arkansas PSC, AEP/SWEPCO was basing its discussion of

removal efficiency on the unit’s allowable SO2 emission rate of 1.2 lb/MMBtu and not necessarily on actual historical

emissions. We still believe, however, that the BART analysis should have additional discussion of the potential

performance of the proposed NID technology. As AEP/SWEPCO pointed out in their response, in the Oklahoma FIP we

found it appropriate to select 0.06 lb/MMBtu for SO2 BART using dry scrubbers. With NID, which can achieve a higher

removal rate than dry scrubbers, one might expect to see a controlled emission rate below 0.06 lb/MMBtu. ADEQ

should ensure that the controlled emission rates evaluated in the BART analysis reflect what NID is capable of achieving

and is not based on analysis of conventional dry scrubbers.  

  

NOx BART

The only explanation offered in the BART analysis for the selection of 0.23 lb/MMBtu using LNB/OFA is that discussions

with the vendor and experience with similar boilers have led to the selection of this emission level. Please provide

documentation from the vendor and any other available documentation to support the selection of 0.23 lb/MMBtu.

While we recognize that the control efficiency of LNB/OFA can depend on factors specific to the boiler, we note that we

approved in the Oklahoma SIP emission limits of 0.15 lb/MMBtu on all 6 coal‐fired subject‐to‐BART units in the state.   

Thank you,  

Dayana Medina

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6

Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division

Air Planning Section (6PD‐L)

214‐665‐7241

medina.dayana@epa.gov
# L_2006080EN.01004501.xml

| 17.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/45

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 450/2006

of 16 March 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 10 to 16 March 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 1059/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 15.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       4,410,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          84,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,000,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 30,470,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     106,226,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       103,720,000
<LOANS>                                     85,069,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,060,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             201,904,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 185,126,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,693,000
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,953,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     55,000
<COMMON>                                       123,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (673,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             201,904,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,221,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            8,206,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                92,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            21,519,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          10,259,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,461,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        9,058,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                5,092,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,224,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,046,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,046,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,838,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.76
<LOANS-NON>                                  3,837,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   977,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             6,501,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                               10,015,000
<RECOVERIES>                                 1,482,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,060,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,060,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,350,000
        


<PAGE>

</TABLE>
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.12 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
#### Gail J. NEIL, individually, and as Curatrix of Earl Paul Neil, and as Tutrix of the Minors, Christi Neil, Gina Neil and Earl Paul Neil, Jr., and Lisa Neil v. TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, Lloyd’s of London, H.B.L. Industries and Brevini, Inc.

No. 88-CC-2306.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 28, 1988.

In Re TELEDYNE MOVIBLE OFFSHORE, INC., applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writ, to the 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, First Circuit Court of Appeal, Number CW88 1038, Div. B.

DENIED.

LEMMON, J., concurs.

LEMMON, Justice,

concurring.

I voted to grant a rehearing in *Kellis v. Farber,*523 So.2d 843 (La.1988), to consider whether the Legislature intended to allow a plaintiff to obtain venue in his own domicile by the simple expedient of joining his own uninsured motorist carrier in the action, irrespective of the merits of doing so. That issue is not presented in this case.

MARCUS and COLE, JJ., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the “Company”), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 22, 2011
/s/ Jing XieJing Xie

Chief Financial Officer