alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          96,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         62,852
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,185
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,968
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,723
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,658
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,322
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,322
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87


</TABLE>
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 15

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Morris King Udall served his Nation and his State

of Arizona with honor and distinction in his 30 years as

a Member of the United States House of Representatives;

Whereas Morris King Udall became an internationally recognized leader in the field of conservation, personally sponsoring legislation that more than doubled the National

Park and National Wildlife Refuge systems, and added

thousands of acres to America’s National Wilderness

Preservation System;

Whereas Morris King Udall was also instrumental in reorganizing the United States Postal Service, in helping

enact legislation to restore lands left in the wake of surface mining, enhancing and protecting the civil service,

and fighting long and consistently to safeguard the rights

and legacies of Native Americans;

Whereas in his lifetime, Morris King Udall became known as

a model Member of Congress and was among the most

effective and admired legislators of his generation;

Whereas this very decent and good man from Arizona also

left us with one of the most precious gifts of all—a special brand of wonderful and endearing humor that was

distinctly his;
2

SCON 15 ES

Whereas Morris King Udall set a standard for all facing adversity as he struggled against the onslaught of Parkinson’s disease with the same optimism and humor that

were the hallmarks of his life; and

Whereas Morris King Udall in so many ways will continue to

stand as a symbol of all that is best about public service,

for all that is civil in political discourse, for all that is

kind and gentle, and will remain an inspiration to others:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the

4 death of the Honorable Morris King Udall on De5 cember 12, 1998, and extends condolences to the

6 Udall family, and especially to his wife Norma;

7 (2) expresses its profound gratitude to the Hon8 orable Morris King Udall and his family for the

9 service that he rendered to his country; and

10 (3) recognizes with appreciation and respect the

11 Honorable Morris K. Udall’s commitment to and ex12 ample of bipartisanship and collegial interaction in

13 the legislative process.
3

SCON 15 ES

1 SEC. 2. TRANSMISSION OF ENROLLED RESOLUTION.

2 The Secretary of the Senate shall transmit an en3 rolled copy of this concurrent resolution to the family of

4 the Honorable Morris King Udall.

Passed the Senate March 4, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 15

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring Morris King Udall, former United States

condolences of the Congress on his death.Representative from Arizona, and extending the
##### 



FIRST AMENDMENT TO  SECURED BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENTS
 Amended Definitions
 Applicable Margin
 Miscellaneous




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



BORROWER:BIOMED REALTY, L.P., a Maryland limited partnershipBy:
    
    BioMed Realty Trust, Inc., its sole general
partnerBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ KENT GRIFFIN

Kent GriffinTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerAddress:
 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, as Administrative AgentBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ SCOTT CHILDS

Scott ChildsTitle:
    
    Vice PresidentAddress:
 LENDER:KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking
associationBy:
Name:
    
    /s/ SCOTT CHILDS

Scott ChildsTitle:
    
    Vice PresidentAddress:
#### Elizabeth Williams, Plaintiff, *v.*Clara P. “ Smith ”, Also Known as Clara P. Williams et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

April 6, 1959.

*Lawrence, Henkoff & Lawrence (Charles Kemins*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Martin, Wiltshire, Cambridge £ Kerr*for Clara P. “ Smith ”, defendant.

Walter B. Hart, J.

In this action for a declaratory judgment and partition, plaintiff claims to be the Avidow of the deceased; that the conveyance of the real property purporting to create *586a tenancy by the entirety between the decedent and defendant ‘ ‘ his wife ’ in effect created a tenancy in common, since plaintiff’s marriage antedated defendant’s by a great number of years.

In opposition to the instant motion for summary judgment, defendant asserts. she was married in a civil ceremony to decedent on July 19, 1945 after he had obtained a divorce in Kings County on June 22, 1945 from one Marion Williams; that from that marriage there were 4 children, the oldest of whom is 31 years of age; that these children resided with defendant and the decedent until they reached their majority; that neither the children nor she knew of plaintiff’s existence or her claims until after the decedent’s death.

To grant the instant motion would in effect hold that decedent’s marriage to Marion Williams was void and that the issue of that marriage were illegitimate. This may not be done summarily on motion. As was recently stated by the Appellate Division (2d Dept.) in *Apelbaum*v. *Apelbaum*(7 A D 2d 911): “ The presumptions favoring validity of marriages and legitimacy of children are so strong as to eclipse the presumption that might otherwise protect the validity and subsistence of a prior marriage of one or another of the parties and to place upon the party who seeks to rebut these presumptions the burden of proving that the prior marriage or marriages were valid and not terminated prior to the marriage in" question, even though this might require the proof of a negative.”

The principle reflected in that decision is further succinctly expressed in Richardson on Evidence (8th ed., § 63) as follows: ‘ ‘ Where persons live and cohabit as husband and wife and are reputed to be such, a presumption arises that they have been legally married, and this presumption, especially in a case involving legitimacy, can be repelled only by the most cogent and satisfactory evidence.”

Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

Submit order.
#### Stephanie SWEENEY v. Bruce J. SWEENEY.

No. 87-C-2668.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Sweeney, Bruce J.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0290; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 311-667.

Denied.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

WILLIAM GRONER,

Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

Eric K. S hinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2012

- 7072

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 10

- 1280, Judge Robert N. Davis.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

K ENNETH M. C ARPENTER , Carpenter, Chartered, of Topeka, Kansas, argued for claimant

- appellant.

S HELLEY D. W EGER , Attorney, Commercial litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent

appellee. With her on the brief were S TUART F. D ELERY

, Acting Assistant Attorney General, J EANNE E. D AVIDSON

, Director, and K IRK T. M ANHARDT , Assistant Director. Of

counsel on the brief were M ICHAEL J. T IMINSKI , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and M EGHAN H ERNANDEZ

,Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, D YK , and P ROST

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 1, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
#### STATE ex rel. Samuel WILSON v. Hon. Frank A. MARULLO, Jr., Judge, Criminal District Court, Section “D”, Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-2020.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Wilson, Samuel; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K 6442; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 284-323.

Denied on the showing made.
Order entered November 24, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01047-CV

MARK AND D'NELLA SHERBET, Appellants

V.

RAFAELLA BENDER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-12935-I

ORDER

By order dated November 5, 2014, we granted court reporter Sheretta L. Martin’s request 

to extend the time for filing the reporter’s record to November 14, 2014. To date, however, the 

record has not been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Martin to file the record within TEN 

(10) DAYS. We expressly caution Ms. Martin that failure to comply with this order may result 

in an order that she not sit as a court reporter until she complies.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order by electronic 

transmission to the Honorable Phyllis Lister Brown, Judge of the 162nd Judicial District Court of 

Dallas County, Texas; Ms. Martin; and counsel for all parties. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Antonio JAMES.

No. 89-KD-0219.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1989.

In re James, Antonio; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 271-107.

Denied.

LEMMON, J.,

votes to grant the application to the extent of ordering transcription of the opening statements and closing arguments.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (1.8 MB)
 
 158th Fighter Wing Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David L. Goldfein CSAF Korean Kolligian Jr. Trophy Award
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Horace TOPPINS.

No. 87-KK-0177.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 22, 1987.

In re Toppins, Horace; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Jef*413ferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 87-10; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-K-45.

Granted. Grand jury proceedings are stayed until completion of preliminary examination.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 13, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204:

                    1.                     *Meetinghouse Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Dorchester, Massachusetts; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Meetinghouse Bank, Dorchester, Massachusetts.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 14, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6528 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 16, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 16, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0099. INYANG PETER ODUOK v. FULTON DEKALB HOSPITAL AUTHORITY d/b/a GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV263891
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 80 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 80

 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 10, 2000

   Mr. Lott submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, February 10, 2000, or Friday, February 11, 2000, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, 
February 22, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, February 16, 2000, Thursday, February 17, 
2000, or Friday, February 18, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 29, 2000, for 
morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
#### Edward Joseph McCANN, III, Appellant, v. Crystal Gail McCANN, Appellee.

No. 87-2850.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 22, 1988.

Jo Ellen Farnham, Zephyrhills, for appellant.

Michael W. Thomsen of J. Stanford Lif-sey, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

*977PER CURIAM.

Appellant/husband appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to ap-pellee/wife in this dissolution action. We find error only in the trial judge’s failure to set forth specific findings supporting the award of attorney’s fees as required under *Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe,*472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). This case is very similar to *Shields v. Shields,*502 So.2d 1349 (Fla.2d DCA 1987). As we said there: “Although we find that the record contains sufficient evidence upon which the trial court could have based its award according to the criteria set forth in *Rowe,*the trial court erred in failing to set forth its specific findings. *See also Boyle v. Boyle,*485 So.2d 879 (Fla.2d DCA 1986).” 502 So.2d at 1350. *See also Lanham v. Lanham,*528 So.2d 80 (Fla.2d DCA 1988).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the entry of a new order awarding attorney’s fees wherein the trial judge must set forth his findings as required by *Rowe.*

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and PARKER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Ricky L. MATTHEWS v. Hon. Baron B. BOURG, Judge, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, State of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1313.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Matthews, Ricky L.; applying for writ of mandamus & remedial writ; Parish *60of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 61298.

Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not already done so, on the post-conviction petition submitted in September of 1986, if it has been filed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-1252

GULAM SAMAD NOORY, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-425-643) Submitted: October 17, 2005 Decided: December 27, 2005 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion Michael E. Hadeed, Miguel Rodriquez Rivera, BECKER, HADEED, KELLOGG & BERRY, P.C., Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Anita C. Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Gulam Samad Noory, a native and citizen of Afghanistan, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Noory fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Noory cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED