alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         12,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,168
<CGS>                                            9,687
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    72
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     119
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.53)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1




                              Exhibit Number 3.2.1

                              Articles of Amendment



<PAGE>   2



                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                        OF FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                                       1.

         The name of the corporation is Franklin Financial Corporation.

                                       2.

         The charter of the corporation shall be amended by deleting Article IV
thereof in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu of Article IV:

                                      "IV.

                The Corporation shall have authority to issue 10,000,000
          shares of common stock having no par value, designated "common
          stock". The holders of common stock shall have unlimited
          voting rights, in that such holders shall be entitled to elect
          all of the members of the Board of Directors of the
          Corporation and shall be entitled to vote as a class on all
          matters required or permitted to be submitted to the
          shareholders of the Corporation. The holders of common stock
          shall have the right to receive the net assets of the
          Corporation upon dissolution."

                                       3.

         The amendment set forth in paragraph 2 of these Articles of Amendment
was adopted on April 15, 1997 by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

                                       4.

         The amendment set forth in paragraph 2 of these Articles of Amendment
was duly adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation on May 20, 1997 in
accordance with the provisions of Code Section 48-20-103 of the Tennessee
Business Corporation Act.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of
Amendment to be executed by Richard E. Herrington, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Corporation, on this 20th day of May, 1997.

                                    FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION


                                    By: /s/ Richard E. Herrington
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Richard E. Herrington, President
                                       and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Humberto Bravo, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Placer Del Mar, Ltd.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Humberto Bravo
---------------------------
Humberto Bravo
Chief Executive Officer
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 30

Recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of members of America’s nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and private volunteer organizations

(PVO’s) throughout their history and specifically in answer to their

courageous response to recent disasters in Central America and Kosovo.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. SARBANES, and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of members of

America’s nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and

private volunteer organizations (PVO’s) throughout their

history and specifically in answer to their courageous

response to recent disasters in Central America and

Kosovo.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) recognizes and commends the sacrifice,

4 dedication, and commitment of those serving with,

5 and those who have served with, American non6 governmental organizations (NGO’s) and private vol-
2

SCON 30 IS

1 unteer organizations (PVO’s) that provide humani2 tarian relief to millions of the world’s poor and dis3 placed;

4 (2) urges all Americans to join in commemo5 rating and honoring those serving in, and those who

6 have served in, America’s NGO and PVO community

7 for their sacrifice, dedication and commitment; and

8 (3) calls upon the people of the United States

9 to appreciate and reflect upon the commitment and

10 dedication of relief workers, that they often serve in

11 harm’s way with threats to their own health and

12 safety, and their organizations who have responded

13 to recent tragedies in Central America and Kosovo

14 with great care, skill, and speed, and to make appro15 priate steps to recognize and encourage awareness of

16 the contributions that these relief workers and their

17 organizations have made in helping ease human suf18 fering.

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-332-CV

BONDEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.	APPELLANT	

	V.

CHRISTINE LOWERY, INDIVIDUALLY 	APPELLEES

AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE 

OF THE HEIRS AND ESTATE OF FRANK

LOWERY, DECEASED 	

	----------

	FROM THE 153RD COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “Joint Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.  

DELIVERED: January 25, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0428

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

TYLER EDWARD GIFFIN,

Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 8, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellee’s response brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 2 2020

12/02/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0428
#### Jeffrey J. SARDELLA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1557.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 30, 1988.

Rehearing and Stay Denied July 6, 1988.

Douglas N. Duncan of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth and Romano, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse Appellant’s sentence because the trial court’s reasons for departure are invalid. The trial court improperly departed from the recommended guidelines sentence based upon hearsay allegations, *Cannada v. State,*472 So.2d 1296, 1299 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); and upon Appellant’s breach of the public trust while Appellant was a public servant. Breach of public trust is an inherent component of the crime of Bribery by a Public Servant, Florida Statutes, § 838.015(1). Thus, the trial court’s reliance on that reason for departure is invalid. *See State v. Cote,*487 So.2d 1039 (Fla.1986).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
#### Sharon Slater BURTON, Jane Ann Johns, Carol Westmoreland and Donna Schultz, Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Leonard W. BARKER, Jean E. Russell, aka Jean E. Jalbert, Carl Slater, Leleaha Beveridge, Ruth Andrews, Athleen Rice, and Kathleen Ray, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 19631.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Feb. 13, 1985.

George B. Handy, Ogden, for defendants and appellants.

Robert A. Echard, Ogden, for plaintiffs and respondents.

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal by the defendant Leonard W. Barker from a judgment entered against him for $20,000 on the plaintiffs’ first cause of action of their complaint. The second cause of action against the defendant Jean E. Russell, aka Jean E. Jalbert, was dismissed by the trial court on motion of the plaintiffs. The trial court did not act or rule on the third cause of action alleged in the complaint against the defendants Carl Slater, Leleaha Beveridge, Ruth Andrews, Athleen Rice, and Kathleen Ray. All of these defendants were served with summons, and the defendant Beveridge filed a pro se answer. The default of the defendants Rice and Ray was entered by the clerk of the court. No further proceedings were taken against the defendants Slater and Andrews.

In its findings of fact, which were prepared following the trial of the first cause of action, the court stated that “the plaintiffs’ action against the co-defendants will be dealt with in a separate Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law and Judgment.” Thus the case has only been partially tried, and the claims of the plaintiffs against the defendants in the third cause of action have not been disposed of by the trial court. In view of this state of the record, the appeal must be dismissed as not having been taken from a final judgment. Since it is conceivable that one of the defendants in the third cause of action may desire to appeal a judgment which may be rendered against him or her, we cannot now entertain piecemeal, the defendant Barker’s appeal. We must wait until the conclusion of the proceedings in the trial court and handle all appeals at that time.

Appeal dismissed.

*1218HALL, C.J., and STEWART and DURHAM, JJ., concur.

ZIMMERMAN, J., does not participate herein.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 51

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 5, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, August 5, 1999, Fri4 day, August 6, 1999, or Saturday, August 7, 1999, on

5 a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

6 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

7 or adjourned until noon on Wednesday, September 8,

8 1999, or until such time on that day as may be specified

9 by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to

10 recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after
2

SCON 51 ATS

1 Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section

2 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and

3 that when the House adjourns on the legislative day of

4 Thursday, August 5, 1999, Friday, August 6, 1999, or

5 Saturday, August 7, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant

6 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

7 designee, it stand adjourned until 10:00 a.m. on Wednes8 day, September 8, 1999, or until noon on the second day

9 after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to sec10 tion 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

11 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

12 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

13 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

14 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen15 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

16 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enterasys Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Mark Aslett
-----------------------
Mark Aslett
Chief Executive Officer
March 17, 2005
#### Stuart REDD v. SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA HOSPITAL ASSN.

No. 88-CC-0266.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 1, 1988.

In re Stuart Redd, applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the 14th Ju*514dicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, No. 87-490; Third Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CW88-0099.

Denied.
#### Ghislaine MESIDOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2138.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 9, 1988.

Lloyd M. Routman, of Lloyd M. Rout-man, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Alfonso M. Saldana, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse the denial of a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. During the plea proceedings, the trial court failed to comply with § 90.606, Florida Statutes (1985), by failing to swear in the interpreter. Also, the court failed to determine the competency and bias of the interpreter.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT (32.2)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PeopleSupport, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for
the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Caroline Rook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Caroline Rook  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 February 25, 2005 45
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 149

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representa3 tives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3244) to combat

4 trafficking of persons, especially into the sex trade, slav5 ery, and slavery-like conditions, in the United States and

6 countries around the world through prevention, through

7 prosecution and enforcement against traffickers, and

8 through protection and assistance to victims of trafficking,

9 shall make the following correction:

10 In section 2002(a)(2)(A)(ii), strike ‘‘June 7,

11 1999,’’ and insert ‘‘December 13, 1999,’’.

Passed the Senate October 11 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 149

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To correct the enrollment of H.R. 3244.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. J. RES. 55

To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice,

considered, read the third time, and passed

JOINT RESOLUTION

To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Senate and House of Representatives shall meet

4 in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour

5 of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on the 5th day of January,

6 2001, and the President of the Senate shall be their pre7 siding officer. Two tellers shall be previously appointed on

8 the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House

9 of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are

10 opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates

11 and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral

12 votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, pre-
2

SJ 55 CPS

1 sented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the

2 States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, hav3 ing then read the same in the presence and hearing of

4 the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall

5 appear from the said certificates; and the votes having

6 been ascertained and counted in the manner and according

7 to the rules by law provided, the result of the same shall

8 be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall

9 thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announce10 ment shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the per11 sons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the

12 United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be

13 entered on the Journals of the two Houses.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America v. The SUPERIOR OIL COMPANY.

No. 9255.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Jan. 3, 1940.

Ben Harrison, U. S. Atty., and E. H. Mitchell and Armond Monroe Jewell, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Dempsey & Mackay and Arthur Mc-Gregor, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel for respective parties that this cause is governed by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Helvering v. Wilshire Oil Company, 60 S.Ct. 18, 84 L.Ed.-, decided Nov. 6, 1939, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that a judgment of reversal, stipulated to by counsel, be forthwith filed and entered herein, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.