alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000846909
<NAME>                        Cabletron Systems, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         159,422
<SECURITIES>                                   113,932
<RECEIVABLES>                                  240,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,260
<INVENTORY>                                    229,512
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               840,421
<PP&E>                                         278,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,566,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          469,476
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,722
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,088,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,566,500
<SALES>                                      1,411,279
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,411,279
<CGS>                                          599,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  599,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,089
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (276,527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (31,136)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (245,391)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (245,391)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.47)








</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
Nos. 33-39781, 33-39725, 33-40400, 33-40395, 33-40396, 33-66084, 33-54397,
33-54399, 33-54393 and 33-40702 of Nabisco Group Holdings Corp. on Form S-8, of
our report dated February 2, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Nabisco Group Holdings Corp. for the year ended December 31, 1999.

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Parsippany, New Jersey

March 21, 2000
EXHIBIT
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October
              23, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
              M.
              CancioHugo
              M. CancioTitle:
              Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Ming Hsieh, President and Chief Executive Officer of Cogent, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: November 15, 2004



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Ming Hsieh                       
|Ming Hsieh                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
50457.

#### GENERAL ENVIRONMENT, INC. v. DAKEN PROPERTIES, INC.

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

Daken Properties, Inc., appellee, brought a complaint against General Environment, Inc., appellant. The case was submitted to the trial judge without a jury, resulting in findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the entry of a money judgment against the defendant-appellant on October 8, 1974. An appeal was *765entered from this judgment on November 4, 1974. On November 19, 1974, the trial judge entered an order extending the time for filing a transcript of the proceedings to December 2,1974. On December 20,1974, appellant filed a motion reciting that the case was unreported, that notice of appeal had been filed, and that counsel had been unable to agree on a "reconstructed transcript” and prayed for a rule nisi directed to complainant-appellee to show cause why the transcript as reconstructed by defendant-appellant, attached to the motion, should not be approved by the court. On the same day the trial judge entered the following order: "Defendant having failed to present said Motion in a timely fashion, and all parties to this case having agreed prior to trial that the case would not be appealed, the trial not having been reported pursuant to that agreement and in accord with Rule 35 of the Rules of the Civil Court of Fulton County, Defendant’s Motion is hereby denied.” On December 24, 1974, the appellant-defendant entered an appeal to this court from this judgment without a certificate for review. The appeal from the judgment of October 8, 1974, was docketed in this court on January 14, 1975, as Case No. 50412, having been transmitted to this court without a transcript at the request of the appellant, according to the certificate of the clerk, sent up with the record. The appeal from the judgment of December 20, 1974 was docketed in this court on January 21, 1975. The appellant, subsequently, withdrew the appeal from the judgment of October 8, 1974, which was a final judgment entered in the case. The only case now pending before this court is an appeal from the denial of the motion relating to approval of the proposed transcript for use in the dismissed appeal. *Held:*

Pretermitting the question of whether the appeal before this court should be dismissed for other reasons *(Adamson v. Adamson,*226 Ga. 719 (177 SE2d 241)), it is apparent that the only purpose to be served by a decision in the present appeal, if in favor of appellant, would be to provide a transcript of proceedings for the appeal in Case No. 50412, which has been withdrawn from this court, the question presented by the present appeal is moot. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

*766Argued March 11, 1975

Decided May 9, 1975.

*Hugh Nations,*for appellant.

*Gregory*W. *Sturgeon,*for appellee.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 64
          - [WC Docket No. 10-191; Report No. 2939]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rule; petition for reconsideration.

# SUMMARY:

In this document, a Petition for Reconsideration (Petition) has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding concerning rules that govern access to toll-free numbers by users of Internet-based Telecommunications Relay Services (iTRS).

# DATES:

Oppositions to the Petition must be filed by January 24, 2012. Replies to an opposition must be filed February 3, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Heather Hendrickson, Wireline Competition Bureau, (202) 418-1580.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 2939, released December 23, 2011. The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-(800) 378-3160). The Commission will not send a copy of this                     *Notice*                     pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because this                     *Notice*                     does not have an impact on any rules of particular applicability.                

*Subject:*                     Internet-Based Telecommunications Relay Service Numbering, published at 76 FR 59551, September 27, 2011, in WC Docket No. 10-191, and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e).                     *See*                     1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)).                

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                

Federal Communications Commission.

Marlene H. Dortch,

Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of the Managing Director.

[FR Doc. 2012-72 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 229 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 229

 Making certain majority appointments to certain Senate committees for 
                          the 106th Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 9, 1999

 Mr. Lott submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Making certain majority appointments to certain Senate committees for 
                          the 106th Congress.

    Resolved, That notwithstanding the provisions of rule XXV, the 
following shall constitute the majority membership on those Senate 
committees listed below for the 106th Congress, or until their 
successors are appointed:
    Committee on Finance: Mr. Roth (Chairman), Mr. Grassley, Mr. Hatch, 
Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Lott, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
Mack, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. Coverdell.
    Committee on Foreign Relations: Mr. Helms (Chairman), Mr. Lugar, 
Mr. Hagel, Mr. Smith of Oregon, Mr. Grams, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Thomas, 
Mr. Ashcroft, Mr. Frist, and Mr. Chafee.
    Committee on Environment and Public Works: Mr. Smith of New 
Hampshire (Chairman), Mr. Warner, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Bond, Mr. 
Voinovich, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Bennett, Mrs. Hutchison, and Mr. Chafee.
    Committee on Ethics: Mr. Roberts (Chairman), Mr. Smith of New 
Hampshire, and Mr. Voinovich.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. William Blackham, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ J. William Blackham              
|J. William Blackham                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 7, 2007
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0003062

19-MAR-2015

01:28 PM
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                          Year Ended December 31, 1996
                (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Loss before cumulative effect of change in accounting
     accounting principle, extraordinary item, and
     income taxes                                                   $    (7,377)

Effect of dividends in arrears on preferred stock                        (1,447)
                                                                    -----------

                                                                    $    (8,824)
                                                                    -----------

Average shares outstanding                                            1,051,180

Net effect of the assumed exercise of stock options and
     warrants - based on the modified treasury stock method           4,073,684
                                                                    -----------

                                                                      5,124,864
                                                                    -----------

Loss per share before cumulative effect of change in
     accounting principle, extraordinary item, and income
     taxes                                                          $     (1.72)
                                                                    -----------
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Energenx, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Rick
      Street, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November
              12, 2008
            By:
            /s/
              Rick
              StreetRick
                Street
              Chief
                  Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                               DQE EXHIBIT 23.1



                         Independent Auditors' Consent

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-60966 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-3, Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement No. 33-29147 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration
Statement Nos. 33-66488 and 33-72582 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 33-46773 and 33-87974 of DQE,
Inc. on Form S-8, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-32433 of
DQE, Inc. on Form S-4 and Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos.
333-80377 and 333-80377-1 of DQE Capital Corporation on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 28, 1999, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of DQE, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1999.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 29, 2000
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward L. LUCERO.

No. 88-KH-0695.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Lucero, Edward L.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 320-151; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-0191.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6241
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAUREN ANTHONY WATSON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-262, CA-98-4125-7) Submitted: April 27, 2000 Decided: May 3, 2000Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999) and his motion for reconsideration. We havereviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Watson , Nos. CR-97-262; CA-98-4125-7 (D.S.C. Jan. 3 & Feb. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Date :**  **June 26 , 2014**  **Meetin g**  **: Webinar** 

**– “** **Meeting State Goals ”**  **Rule(s) Discussed: Clean Power Plan Proposal**  **-- Docket number EPA**  **- HQ** **- OAR** 

**- 2013**  **- 0602**  **Attendee List: Attached. Presenter**

**– Chris Sherry**  **Written Materials? Yes/No**

**– Presentation Attached**  Summary of Relevant , Factual Information Received: This was the second in a series of three webinar s EPA offered to state and tribal officials about aspects of the June 20 14 proposed Clean Power Plan; the subject of this we binar was Meet ing State Goals. The webinar is posted online at www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A., 

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

BIG FISH GAMES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2018-2186

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Western District of Washington in No. 2:17-cv-01183-RAJ, 

Judge Richard A. Jones.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

JAMES J. FOSTER, Prince Lobel Tye LLP, Boston, MA, 

argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by PAUL 

J. HAYES, AARON JACOBS. 

 DOUGLAS FRED STEWART, Bracewell LLP, Seattle, WA, 

argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by 

TIMOTHY GEIGER, Houston, TX; DAVID JOHN BALL, New 

York, NY. 

 ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

September 13, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
#### PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Lamont BRANDT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81SA177.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

June 13, 1983.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. Gen., Laura E. Udis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lit. Sec., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

John E. Popovich, Jr., Denver, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has appealed the trial court’s ruling denying his Crim.P. 35(b) motion in which he challenged the constitutionality of the provisions and administration of the Colorado Sex Offenders Act (CSOA)1 on due process, equal protection, and cruel and unusual punishment grounds. We affirm the decision of the district court.

I.

On May 24, 1976, the defendant was convicted of first-degree assault2 and attempt to commit first-degree sexual assault3 after he entered pleas of guilty pursuant to a plea agreement. The trial court sentenced the defendant under the provisions of the CSOA for a term of one day to life and recommended that the defendant be transferred from the receiving center at the state penitentiary to the Colorado State Hospital in Pueblo.

At the Crim.P. 35(b) hearing, the defendant appeared *pro se.*His complaint centered around his being transferred back and forth between the penitentiary and the state hospital. According to the defendant, the parole board requested in August of 1980, that he return to the state hospital from the penitentiary for further treatment. The defendant declined, claiming that he had received maximum benefits from therapy programs offered at the state hospital. The trial court entered a written *713decision denying the defendant’s numerous claims for post-conviction relief under Crim.P. 35(b). Counsel was appointed by the trial court to represent the defendant on appeal.

II.

The arguments on the issues raised by the defendant in this appeal were recently considered and rejected by this court in *People v.*White, 656 P.2d 690 (Colo.1983). No useful purpose would be served by reiterating the principles announced in that decision. Therefore, *People v. White*is dispositive of this case.

III.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

1

. Sections 16-13-201 to -216, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8 & 1982 Supp.).

2

. Section 18-3-202, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8 & 1982 Supp.).

3

. Section 18-3-402, C.R.S.1973 (now in 1978 Repl.Vol. 8).