alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Sunshine Federal Register Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, [NRC-2012-
0002].

DATE: Week of March 26, 2012.

PLACE: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Public and Closed.

ADDITIONAL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Week of March 26, 2012

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

8:55 a.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative).

    a. FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co. (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power 
Station, Unit 1), Appeal of LBP-11-13 (Apr. 26, 2011), Docket No. 50-
346-LR (Tentative).

    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--www.nrc.gov.
* * * * *
    * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)--(301) 
415-1292. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, (301) 
415-1651.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Bill Dosch, Chief, 
Work Life and Benefits Branch, at 301-415-6200, TDD: 301-415-2100, or 
by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#493e202525202824672d263a2a2109273b2a672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34435d58585d55591a505b47575c745a46571a535b42">[email protected]</span></a>. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no 
longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969), or send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#325653405e575c571c45405b555a46725c40511c555d44"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0b4b1a2bcb5beb5fea7a2b9b7b8a490bea2b3feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Rochelle Bavol,
Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7177 Filed 3-21-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-81,260]


Cinram Distribution, LLC, a Subsidiary of Cinram International 
Income Fund, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Good People, 
Including Workers Whose Unemployment Insurance (UI) Wages Are Reported 
Through Real Time Staffing, Aurora, IL; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on February 3, 2012, applicable to workers of Cinram Distribution, LLC, 
a subsidiary of Cinram International Income Fund, including on-site 
leased workers from Good People, Aurora, Illinois. The workers are 
engaged in the supply of optical media distribution services. The 
notice was published in the Federal Register on February 21, 2012 (77 
FR 9971).
    At the request of Illinois State, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that workers leased from Good People employed on-site at the Aurora, 
Illinois location of Cinram Distribution, LLC, a subsidiary of Cinram 
International Income Fund had their wages reported through a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name Real Time 
Staffing.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
company imports of the supply of optical media distribution.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-81,260 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers from Cinram Distribution, LLC, a subsidiary of 
Cinram International Income Fund, including on-site leased workers 
from Good People, including workers whose unemployment insurance 
(UI) wages are reported through Real Time Staffing, Aurora, 
Illinois, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after January 20, 2011 through February 3, 2014, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1074, as 
amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2012.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7157 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: May 5, 2006 /s/ ALAN D. GOLD   Alan D. Gold   Chief Executive Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: May 5, 2006 /s/ R. KENT GRIFFIN, JR.   R. Kent Griffin, Jr.   Chief Financial Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
#### CITY OF LAKE WORTH, Appellant, v. Donna M. TAUBMAN and Kathleen L. Chidsey, Appellees.

No. 4-86-1758.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1987.

Alan Fallik, Lake Worth, for appellant.

Robert E. Gordon, Lake Worth, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Lewis v. City of Atlantic Beach,*467 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
1 

### Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:55 AM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Subject: Exceptional Events Proposed Rule Revisions - Conference Call with WESTAR to Discuss

Clarifying Questions (Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0572)

Forwarding to post in docket EPA

‐ HQ

‐ OAR

‐ 2013

‐ 0572. Discussion on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 to respond to

WESTAR clarifying questions regarding the Exceptional Events Proposed Rule Revisions.

Conference Call Attendees

Dan Johnson, WESTAR

Bob Lebens, WESTAR

Karen Magliano, CARB

Lev Gabrilovich, US EPA/OAQPS

Beth Palma, US EPA/OAQPS

From: Dan Johnson [mailto:djohnson@westar.org]

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:31 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth <Palma.Elizabeth@epa.gov>; Magliano, Karen@ARB <karen.magliano@arb.ca.gov>; Bob Lebens

<blebens@westar.org>; Mary Uhl <maryuhl@westar.org>

Subject: Confirming call to discuss exceptional events

All

–

I don’t recall pinning down the details of our call next Tuesday. Let’s use WESTAR conference line as follows:

DATE: Tuesday, December 15 th

TIME: 10:30

– 11:30 PACIFIC time

CALL:

CODE:

Dan Johnson

Western States Air Resources Council (WESTAR)

www.westar.org
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement No. 33-44036 on Form S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration
Statement No. 33-44035 on Form S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration
Statement No. 33-55094 on Form S-3 dated November 25, 1992, Registration
Statement No. 33-56856 on Form S-8 dated January 8, 1993, Registration
Statement No. 33-72512 on Form S-8 dated December 3, 1993, Registration
Statement No. 33-81314 on Form S-8 dated July 7, 1994, Registration Statement
No. 333-728 on Form S-3 dated January 30, 1996, Registration Statement No.
33-85754 on Form S-3 dated January 30, 1996 (Post Effective Amendment No. One),
Registration Statement No. 333-15123 on Form S-3 dated October 30, 1996,
Registration Statement No. 333-18237 on Form S-8 dated December 19, 1996,
Registration Statement No. 333-18239 on Form S-8 dated December 19, 1996,
Registration Statement No. 333-30597 on Form S-3 dated June 30, 1997,
Registration Statement No. 333-44407 on Form S-3 dated January 14, 1998,
Registration Statement No. 333-48635 on Form S-3 dated March 25, 1998,
Registration Statement No. 333-83035 on Form S-8 dated July 16, 1999, and
Registration Statement No. 333-87561 on Form S-3, as amended, dated January 31,
1999 of our report dated March 7, 2000 (except for Note M which date is March
10, 2000), relating to the consolidated financial statements of VSI
Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the Company's annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2000
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wallace S. PUGH.

No. 88-KH-1069.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Pugh, Wallace S.; applying for habeas corpus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 116771.

Denied. Premature. The court has obtained information that the first claim is being considered by the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, in writ No. 88-KW-0714 pending there. By relator’s own admission, his second claim was not included in previous writs. This claim of insufficient indictment must be presented to the district court and the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, prior to submission to this Court for its consideration.
#### Harold J. YURATICH, Sr. v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO. and Zenith Radio Corporation.

No. 88-C-0124.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Yuratich, Harold J. Sr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7290; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “J”, No. 77-13378.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1212.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

     I, Edwin C. Quattlebaum, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer, President and Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors of MetaMorphix, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that to the best of myknowledge, based upon a review of the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

|   | By:    | /S/ EDWIN C.          QUATTLEBAUM                                                                                             |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Edwin C. Quattlebaum,          Ph.D.                                                                                          |
|   |   | *Chief Executive Officer,            President and Co-Chairman of         the Board of Directors of MetaMorphix,        Inc.* |

 

Date: February 29, 2008

----
#### INTERIOR SYSTEMS OF LOUISIANA, INC. v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. GIBBS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. STATE of Louisiana, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.

No. 88-C-0145.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Labor La., Dept, of; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA86 1347, CA86 1348; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, Nos. 301019, 301809.

Prior report: La.App., 518 So.2d 598.

Granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<CIK>                  0000847015
<NAME>                 TC X Calibur, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        72,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (15,060)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     57,225
<PP&E>                                               455,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (411,279)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       101,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                294,226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             5,480
<OTHER-SE>                                          (197,770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         101,936
<SALES>                                              477,767
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     477,767
<CGS>                                                433,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        433,080
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     180,201
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (3,912)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (133,979)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      5,447
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (133,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)


</TABLE>
#### Leroy WILLIAMS v. SUCCESSION OF George WILLIAMS.

No. 87 CA 0679.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

June 21, 1988.

William Cooper, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee.

Daniel K. Willis, St. Francisville, for defendant-appellant Succession of Williams.

Before WATKINS, CARTER and FOIL, JJ.

WATKINS, Judge.

This is an appeal brought by the Succession of George Williams, plaintiff-in-recon-vention, from a judgment rendered on motion for summary judgment filed by the said succession. The summary judgment orders Leroy Williams, agent (mandatary) of the late George Williams, to render an accounting of his management, but only for the period beginning ten years before the death of George Williams on March 28, 1982. On appeal, the succession contends that the judgment rendered should require an accounting from the inception of the principal-agency relationship until its termination. Leroy Williams answered the appeal, but his counsel admits the answer to appeal was filed too late. We amend and affirm the judgment of the trial court as amended.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in limiting the accounting by the agent to the period beginning ten years prior to the death of the principal.

The duty of an agent to account is governed by LSA-C.C. art. 3004, which reads as follows:

> He is obliged to render an account of his management, unless this obligation has been expressly dispensed with in his favor.

Annexed to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of the power of attorney dated July 18, 1968, executed by George Williams, Clora Williams Grace, Leon Williams, and Leroy Williams. This instrument is in authentic form, names and *1105appoints Leroy Williams as the agent of George Williams and does not dispense with the obligation of the agent to account.

Thus, under the express provisions of the codal article, Leroy Williams, the agent, is required to render an accounting. However, in the reasons for judgment the trial court found that under the provisions of LSA-C.C. art. 3499 the duty to render an accounting is in effect prescribed as to matters occurring more than ten years before the death of George Williams, presumably the date of the termination of the principal-agency contract. In the reasons for judgment the trial court noted that the agent did not file a pleading raising the objection of prescription. Under the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. art. 927 the court cannot supply the objection of prescription, consequently the court erred in placing a ten year limit on the period for which the agent is ordered to account.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is amended to require Leroy Williams to account to the Succession of George Williams for the administration of the mandate formerly held by Leroy Williams during its entire existence, without limit as to time and, as thus amended, affirmed. All costs of this appeal to be paid by Leroy Williams.

AMENDED AND, AS AMENDED, AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Jack Wagenti, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Power Group, Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5)

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 19, 2006.

|                              | 
|----------------------------- | 
|                             
|/s/Jack Wagenti               | 
|Jack Wagenti                  | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) |
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Scott M. Colosi,Chief Financial Officer of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,that:

 

(1)    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 7,  2009 | By:    | /s/ SCOTT M.  COLOSI |
|----------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                       |   |                      |
|                       |   | Scott M. Colosi      |
|                       |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

1

----