alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
District of
Division NO.
Court No. 31-280016
Estate No. 31-280016


                  CERTIFICATE OF FULL PERFORMANCE OF PROPOSAL

                        IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF
                        FILM OPTICALS OF CANADA LIMITED

The Undersigned, Beallor & Partners  Inc., the Trustee acting in the proposal of
FILM OPTICALS OF CANADA LIMITED, certifies that the  proposal, as filed with the
official receiver on the 24th day of  January 1994 and as amended for the second
time on the 24th  day of September 1999 has been fully performed  as of the 25th
day of April 2000.

Dated at Toronto this 25th day of April, 2000.


BEALLOR & PARTNERS INC.,
TURSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF
FILM OPTICALS OF CANADA LTD.,



By/S/ E.C. White
---------------------
E.C. WHITE, C.A., CIP
Trustee
# Euroopa Liidu C 57I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 057I |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 63. aastakäik20. veebruar 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 057I

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

63. aastakäik20. veebruar 2020

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Nõukogu |
| 2020/C 57 I/01 | Nõukogu otsus, 17. veebruaril 2020, millega nimetatakse ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu Saksamaa liige | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Nõukogu

2020/C 57 I/01

Nõukogu otsus, 17. veebruaril 2020, millega nimetatakse ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu Saksamaa liige

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Nõukogu

| 20.2.2020 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CI 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CI 57/1

---

NÕUKOGU OTSUS,

17. veebruaril 2020,

millega nimetatakse ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu Saksamaa liige

(2020/C 57 I/01)

EUROOPA LIIDU NÕUKOGU,

võttes arvesse Euroopa Liidu toimimise lepingut,

võttes arvesse Euroopa Parlamendi ja nõukogu määrust (EÜ) nr 1922/2006, millega luuakse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituut, (1) eriti selle artiklit 10,

võttes arvesse kandidaatide nimekirju, mille liikmesriikide valitsused on nõukogule esitanud,

ning arvestades järgmist:

| (1) | Nõukogu nimetas oma 27. mai 2019. aasta otsusega (2) ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu liikmed ja asendusliikmed ajavahemikuks 1. juunist 2019 kuni 31. maini 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Nõukogu nimetas oma 27. mai 2019. aasta otsusega (2) ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu liikmed ja asendusliikmed ajavahemikuks 1. juunist 2019 kuni 31. maini 2022.

| (2) | Saksamaa valitsus on esitanud kandidaadi ühele täidetavale liikme ametikohale, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Saksamaa valitsus on esitanud kandidaadi ühele täidetavale liikme ametikohale,

ON VASTU VÕTNUD KÄESOLEVA OTSUSE:

Artikkel 1

Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu Saksamaa liikmeks nimetatakse järelejäänud ametiajaks kuni 31. maini 2022, järgmine isik:

VALITSUSTE ESINDAJAD

| Riik | Liige | Asendusliige |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Saksamaa | Daniela BEHRENS | |

Riik

Liige

Asendusliige

Saksamaa

Daniela BEHRENS

Artikkel 2

Käesolev otsus jõustub selle vastuvõtmise päeval.

Dona Brüsselis, 17. veebruaril 2020,

Nõukogu nimel

Eesistuja

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  ELT L 403, 30.12.2006, lk 9.

1

(2)  Nõukogu 27. mai 2019. aasta otsus, millega nimetatakse ametisse Euroopa Soolise Võrdõiguslikkuse Instituudi haldusnõukogu liikmed ja asendusliikmed (ELT C 185, 29.5.2019, lk 1).

2

---
#### Russell Lamar SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BO-310.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 29, 1987.

*70Russell Lamar Smith, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the denial of his motion for postconviction relief, contending that his guilty plea was involuntary. Specifically, appellant claims that his plea was induced by representations of his counsel and the assistant state attorney that his sentences would be concurrent to his sentence for an offense in Alachua County whereas, in fact, his sentences were made consecutive to the sentence imposed in Ala-chua County. We agree with the trial judge that appellant’s claim is barred by the doctrine of laches since appellant waited ten years, without excuse, to bring this alleged error to the attention of the court, and the state has demonstrated prejudice because the state attorney has destroyed his files and would be precluded from refuting appellant’s claim. *Frazier v. State,*447 So.2d 959 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); and *Remp v. State,*248 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin BRUARD.

No. 87-KK-1083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 14, 1987.

In re Bruard, Calvin; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 316-999; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-7740.

Denied on the showing made.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 35 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 35

   Disapproving the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment 
                          Initiative of 1998.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 4, 1999

Mr. Voinovich introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
 twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs, pursuant 
        to section 602 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
   Disapproving the Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment 
                          Initiative of 1998.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress hereby 
disapproves of the action of the District of Columbia Council described 
as follows: The Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment 
Initiative of 1998, approved by the electors of the District of 
Columbia on November 3, 1998, and transmitted to Congress by the 
Council pursuant to section 602(c) of the District of Columbia Home 
Rule Act.
                                 <all>
```
50295.

#### WRIGHT v. THE STATE.

Webb, Judge.

An Atlanta police officer, assigned to the South Fulton unincorporated area, in the process of answering a domestic call on Buck Hurst Trail outside the corporate limits of Atlanta, arrested Ruth F. Wright on two charges, driving an automobile under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and operating an automobile without a driver’s license. Mrs. Wright’s motion to suppress was overruled, a certificate for immediate review was obtained, and she enumerates three alleged errors, the first being the trial court’s action in overruling her motion to suppress; the second being the court’s finding that "the arrest made by the City of Atlanta police officer outside the city limits ... was a valid arrest and that the evidence obtained was and is admissible”; and the third being that "the court erred in holding that said police officer also had arresting powers as a private citizen outside the city limits of Atlanta under Code Ann. § 27-207.” *Held:*

Generally officers of a municipality have no power to make arrests beyond the corporate limits of such municipality, "unless such jurisdiction is given by local or other laws.” Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., pp. 558, 561 (Code Ann. § 92A-509). An Act approved February 21, 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 591, 595) provides that in all counties having within their boundaries the greater part of a city with a population of 300,000 or more, the county authorities shall determine what police services are required, and shall call upon the city to furnish them. The city shall furnish such services at cost, and thereafter the county shall maintain only such limited police service as required by the Act.1 The Act provides specifically, in Section 13, that "Each of the persons performing county police duties as contemplated herein shall have the same power to make arrests, to execute and return all criminal *407warrants and processes and serve as peace officers as sheriffs now have.” Id., supra, p. 595.

Submitted March 3, 1975

Decided March 17, 1975

Rehearing denied March 31, 1975.

*Larry Cohran,*for appellant.

*Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Thomas R. Moran, Frank A. Bowers, Assistant Solicitors,*for appellee.

We hold that pursuant to such Act a City of Atlanta police officer assigned to the unincorporated area of Fulton County has authority to make arrests in such unincorporated area, and that the arrest in this case was legal. The sole ground to suppress the evidence was that the arrest was illegal, and that having fallen, the trial court was correct in overruling the motion to suppress.

It is unnecessary, in view of our holding, to consider the third enumeration of error. In any event it may be considered as having been abandoned, since appellant gave no argument or citation of authority thereon. Rule 18 (c, 2), this court.

*Judgment affirmed. Bell,*

*C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.*

1

The constitutionality of the Act, and the validity of the contract pursuant thereto between Fulton County and City of Atlanta, were adjudicated and upheld in *Barge v. Camp,*209 Ga. 38 (70 SE2d 360).
PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review Work PlanningPropazine(080808)Note:Thisisanaggregatereportofregisteredusesforthischemical.Labeldataforchemicalswithmorethanonepesticideproductarepresentedinaggregateform(i.e.eachlineofdatamaybeacombinationofdatafromoneormorepesticide).

Food (F) / Non-food (N)Use Site Formulation DescA. I. Max AppRate/AppMax # Apps /CCA. I. MaxAppRate/CCMax #Apps /YearA. I. Max AppRate/YearMinimumRetreatmentIntervalMinimumReentryInterval PGI / PHI / PSI Allow Geo RestrictionsDisAllow GeoRestrictions LimitationsF SORGHUM FLOWABLE CONCENTRATE 1.2 lb / a 1 1.2lb / a NS NS NS 24 hr H11(90) || H12(70) No Restrictions California || Florida ||| CWH || CWJ || CWY ||CZYNORNAMENTAL AND/ORSHADE TREES FLOWABLE CONCENTRATE 1.5lb/a 1 NS NS NS NS 24 hr NS No Restrictions No RestrictionsC46 || CAU || CPE || CWH|| CWJ || CWY || CZYNORNAMENTALHERBACEOUS PLANTS FLOWABLE CONCENTRATE 1.5lb/a 1 NS NS NS NS 24 hr NS No Restrictions No RestrictionsC46 || CAU || CPE || CWH|| CWJ || CWY || CZYNORNAMENTALNONFLOWERING PLANTS FLOWABLE CONCENTRATE 1.5lb/a 1 NS NS NS NS 24 hr NS No Restrictions No RestrictionsC46 || CAU || CPE || CWH|| CWJ || CWY || CZYNORNAMENTAL WOODYSHRUBS AND VINES FLOWABLE CONCENTRATE 1.5lb/a 1 NS NS NS NS 24 hr NS No Restrictions No RestrictionsC46 || CAU || CPE || CWH|| CWJ || CWY || CZYCurrent As Of Date : 2013NDC - No Dosage Conversion ; NS - Not SpecifiedLimitation Code Limitation DescriptionC (46)H (11) __ day(s) preharvest interval (grain).H (12) __ day(s) preharvest interval (forage, fodder).Do not apply through any type of irrigation system.C (AU)Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas below themean high water mark.C (PE)PPE (Protective Personal Equipment) language is found on the label. Please refer to it for specificlanguage.C (RO) Please refer to the label for rotational crop restrictions.C (WH) Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters.C (WJ) This pesticide is toxic to aquatic invertebrates.Each row of this report is determined by the unique combination of the food/nonfood indicator, use site, formulation, and maximum applicationrate per application (key columns). The remaining, non-key columns of the report display either worse case or aggregate data from the labelinformation that defines the unique data row. Note that each non-key column does not necessarily relate to any other non-key column with inthe same row.C (WY) Do not contaminate food or feed by storage or disposal.C (ZY) Do not enter or allow people to enter the treated area until sprays have dried.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-742]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
December 13, 2011

    In accordance with Section 271.7(d) of its rules regarding 
availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below 
the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on December 13, 2011.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
at its meeting held on December 13, 2011, which includes the 
domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available on 
the Board's Web site, www.federalreserve.gov. The minutes are also 
published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual 
Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ``The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial 
conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable 
growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds 
trading in a range from 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September 
to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with 
remaining maturities of approximately 6 years to 30 years with a total 
face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with 
remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 
billion. The Committee also directs the Desk to maintain its existing 
policies of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues 
and of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency 
mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency 
mortgage-backed securities in order to maintain the total face value of 
domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee 
directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to 
facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. 
The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the 
Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's 
balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the 
Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.''

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, January 11, 2012.
William B. English,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 2012-742 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.52

SECOND AMENDMENT

This Second Amendment (the "Second Amendment") is made and entered into as of this 1st day of April, 2011 (the
"Second Amendment Effective Date") and amends the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of September 29, 2008 as further amended by the First Amendment dated August 31, 2009
(collectively, the "Employment Agreement"), by and between NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC. ("NFM") and MICHAEL WEINER ("Executive"). Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.

In
consideration of the foregoing, and other good and valuable consideration, including Executive's continued employment with NFM, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, Executive and NFM hereby agree as follows:

I.     AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT

Section 1 "Term" is hereby amended by deleting such section in its entirety and replacing the same with the
following:



II.    GENERAL PROVISIONS

All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement that have not been specifically amended herein shall remain in full force and effect. This Second
Amendment, together with the Employment Agreement, contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties hereto regarding the subject matter hereof. All prior agreements, promises,
negotiations and representations, either oral or written, relating to the subject matter of this Second Amendment or the Employment Agreement not expressly set forth in this Second Amendment or the
Employment Agreement are of no force or effect. Any waiver, alteration or modification of any of the terms of this Second Amendment shall be valid only if made in writing and signed by both parties
hereto. This Second Amendment may be executed in up to two counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.

NEW FRONTIER MEDIA, INC.

EXECUTIVEBy:

/s/ MARC CALLIPARI

By:

/s/ MICHAEL WEINERName: Marc Callipari

Name: Michael WeinerTitle: Chief Legal Officer


---



QuickLinks
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0344.txt

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:47PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Don DiCristofaro" <don@blueskyenviro.com> 

Date: 01/14/2010 05:03PM 

cc: "'Ken Schisler'" <kschisler@enernoc.com>, "'Rick Counihan'" 

<RCounihan@enernoc.com> 

Subject: Evidence Why a 15 Hour Emergency DR Limit Will Not Work

Melanie,

You asked me to provide something concrete that shows why a 15 hour annual limit for engines 

operating in emergency DR programs will not work. In the attached document are relevant pages 

from the PJM Reliability Assurance Agreement (RAA). This document is incorporated by 

reference as part of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission approved tariff for PJM 

Interconnection. This RAA is the document that establishes the rules and legally binds owners 

of electrical system infrastructure to maintain the reliability of the bulk power system in PJM. 

The attached pages describe the rules for Demand Response:

Rule A2 establishes the 10 dispatch requirement. 

Rule A6 establishes that dispatches may occur only in emergency situations.

Rule A7 establishes the 6 hour event duration.

Rules A2 and A7 together make up the 60 hour maximum dispatch: 10 events x 6 hours each.

These requirements are on the asset level. In other words, PJM expects not only that EnerNOC's 

overall portfolio be able to respond to 10 events x 6 hours each, but that every ASSET be able to do so. 

 As such, we can’t cobble together resources to meet this expectation. Please keep in mind that this is 

an upper limit for PJM that is unlikely to ever be reached. In the past seven years, the PJM ELRP has 

only been called a combined TOTAL of 20 hours in the eastern portion of PJM. The ELRP has never 

been called in the western portion of PJM. The ERCOT EILS has never been called. OP 4 Action 12 has 

only been called once in all of New England.

Ken and I are available tomorrow morning if you or Peter have any questions about the attached. 

Don

Don DiCristofaro, CCM 

Blue Sky Environmental LLC | 1040 Great Plain Avenue; 3rd Floor | Needham, MA 02492 

m: 617-834-8408 | f: 857-221-9464 

don@blueskyenviro.com 

file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/aassem01/Desktop/For%20Rendering/EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0344.txt2/19/2010 12:50:39 PM
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Charys Holding Company, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Raymond J. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: September 6, 2005

                                       /s/ Raymond J. Smith
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Raymond J. Smith, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7240]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    Date: June 19, 2012.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: Review and Analysis of Systems.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: David J. Lipman, M.D., Director, National Center 
for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, 
Building 38, Room 8N805, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-435-5985, 
[email protected].
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.pubmed.central.nih.gov/about/nac/html, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7240 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```