Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 17409 

1See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Preliminary Results, Rescission of, 

and Intent To Rescind, in Part, the 2009–2010 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 65172 (October 20, 

2011). 

2See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of the 2009–2010 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

76375 (December 7, 2011) (Preliminary Results). 

3See Fresh Garlic From the People’s Republic of 

China: Partial Final Results and Partial Final 

Rescission of the 2009–2010 Administrative Review, 

77 FR 11486 (February 27, 2012). 

FTZ 151 was approved by the Board 

on July 6, 1988 (Board Order 389, 53 FR 

27058, 7/18/1988) and expanded on 

February 10, 1999 (Board Order 1023, 

64 FR 8542, 2/22/1999) and April 4, 

2004 (Board Order 1332, 69 FR 26067, 

5/11/2004). 

The current zone project includes the 

following sites: Site 1 (820 acres)—Tall 

Timbers Industrial Center, Intersection 

of State Route 12 and County Road 95, 

Findlay; and Site 3 (373 acres)—Ottawa 

Industrial Park, Intersection of 

Williamstown Street and Sugarmill 

Drive, Ottawa. 

The grantee’s proposed service area 

under the ASF would be Hardin, 

Putnam, Seneca, Allen and Hancock 

Counties, Ohio, as described in the 

application. If approved, the grantee 

would be able to serve sites throughout 

the service area based on companies’ 

needs for FTZ designation. The 

proposed service area is within and 

adjacent to the Toledo Customs and 

Border Protection port of entry. 

The applicant is requesting authority 

to reorganize its existing zone project to 

include both of the existing sites as 

‘‘magnet’’ sites. The ASF allows for the 

possible exemption of one magnet site 

from the ‘‘sunset’’ time limits that 

generally apply to sites under the ASF, 

and the applicant proposes that Site 1 

be so exempted. No usage-driven sites 

are being requested at this time. Because 

the ASF only pertains to establishing or 

reorganizing a general-purpose zone, the 

application would have no impact on 

FTZ 151’s authorized subzones. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Elizabeth Whiteman of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations to the Board. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions (original 

and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address below. The closing period for 

their receipt is May 25, 2012. Rebuttal 

comments in response to material 

submitted during the foregoing period 

may be submitted during the subsequent 

15-day period to June 11, 2012. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Executive Secretary, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board, Room 2111, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230–0002, and in the ‘‘Reading 

Room’’ section of the Board’s Web site, 

which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ 

ftz. For further information, contact 

Elizabeth Whiteman at 

Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0473. 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7274 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[A(32b)–3–2011] 

Foreign-Trade Zone 45—Portland, OR 

Expansion of Manufacturing Authority 

Epson Portland, Inc. (Inkjet Ink); Notice 

of Approval of Restricted Authority 

On December 22, 2011, the Port of 

Portland, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 

(FTZ) 45, requested to expand the scope 

of manufacturing authority approved 

within Subzone 45F, on behalf of Epson 

Portland, Inc. (EPI), in Hillsboro, 

Oregon. The request involved the use of 

privileged foreign (PF) status (19 CFR 

146.41) inputs in manufacturing of ink 

for inkjet printer cartridges. Notice was 

given in the Federal Register inviting 

public comment (A(32b)–3–2011, 76 FR 

81475–81476, 12/28/2011). 

Section 400.32(b)(1) of the FTZ 

Board’s regulations (15 CFR part 400) 

allows the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration to act for the 

Board in making decisions on new 

manufacturing authority when the zone 

benefits sought do not involve the 

election of non-privileged foreign status 

on items involving inverted tariffs. 

Pursuant to that regulatory provision, on 

March 8, 2012, the Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration approved 

authority to include the use of certain 

PF status inputs in the manufacturing of 

ink for inkjet printer cartridges within 

Subzone 45F, subject to the FTZ Act (19 

U.S.C. 81a–81u) and the Board’s 

regulations, including Section 400.28. 

The applicant’s request for broader 

authority, including the manufacturing 

of inkjet ink involving foreign-sourced 

inputs that would be admitted to the 

subzone under nonprivileged foreign 

(NPF) status (19 CFR 146.42), will 

continue to be reviewed and processed 

under FTZ Docket 7–2012 (77 FR 4006, 

1/26/2012). 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7272 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic From the People’s 

Republic of China: Extension of Time 

Limit for Final Results of the 2009– 

2010 Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lingjun Wang, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 6, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2316. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 20, 2011, the Department 

published partial preliminary results of 

the administrative review.1 On 

December 7, 2011, the Department 

published preliminary results of the 

administrative review.2 On February 27, 

2012, the Department published partial 

final results of the administrative 

review.3 The final results of the 

administrative review are currently due 

no later than April 5, 2012. 

Statutory Time Limits 

In antidumping duty administrative 

reviews, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

requires the Department to make a final 

determination in an administrative 

review of an antidumping duty order 

within 120 days after the day on which 

the preliminary results are published. 

However, if it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

120-day period to 180 days after 

publication of the preliminary results. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Department has determined that 

it is not practicable to complete the 

review within the 120-day time period 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17410 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 58 / Monday, March 26, 2012 / Notices 

1See Bottom Mount Combination RefrigeratorFreezers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 

Negative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Alignment of Final Determination With Final 

Antidumping Determination, 76 FR 55044 

(September 6, 2011) (Preliminary Determination). 

2See Memorandum from the Team to Gary 

Taverman, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, 

Re: Scope Modification Requests, dated October 26, 

2011 (Preliminary Scope Memorandum). 

because it requires additional time to 

evaluate the surrogate value 

submissions and arguments made by the 

interested parties following the 

Preliminary Results. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, the Department is extending the 

time limit for completing the final 

results of the administrative review 

from 120 days to 180 days. The final 

results are now due no later than June 

4, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(a) and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7218 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–801] 

Solid Urea From the Russian 

Federation: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dustin Ross or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0747 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

At the request of interested parties, 

the Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on solid urea from the Russian 

Federation for the period July 1, 2010, 

through June 30, 2011. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to complete the 

preliminary results within 245 days 

after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. If it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act 

allows the Department to extend the 

time limit for the preliminary results to 

a maximum of 365 days after the last 

day of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

April 1, 2012, because we require 

additional time to analyze a detailed 

response to a supplemental 

questionnaire that was submitted on 

March 7, 2012. In addition, the 

numerous extensions we have granted 

for filing various responses has 

contributed to us requiring additional 

time to complete the preliminary 

results. 

Therefore, we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 75 days, until 

June 15, 2012. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: March 20, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–7236 Filed 3–23–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–866] 

Bottom Mount Combination 

Refrigerator-Freezers From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

bottom mount combination refrigeratorfreezers (bottom mount refrigerators) 

from the Republic of Korea (Korea). For 

information on the estimated subsidy 

rates, see the ‘‘Suspension of 

Liquidation’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Myrna L. Lobo, Justin M. Neuman, or 

Milton Koch, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 6, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2371, (202) 482–0486, and (202) 

482–2584, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The U.S. producer that filed the 

petition for this investigation is 

Whirlpool Corporation (hereafter, 

Whirlpool, or ‘‘petitioner’’). This 

investigation covers 41 programs. The 

mandatory respondents in this 

investigation are: (1) Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), and its 

cross-owned affiliates Samsung 

Gwangju Electronics Co., Ltd. (SGEC) 

and Samsung Electronics Logitech 

(SEL); (2) LG Electronics (LGE) and its 

cross-owned affiliate, ServeOne Co., 

Ltd., and (3) Daewoo Electronics 

Corporation (DWE). 

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation for which 

we are measuring subsidies is January 1, 

2010, through December 31, 2010. 

Case History 

The following events have occurred 

since the Department published the 

Preliminary Determination.1 From 

September through December 2011, the 

Department issued numerous 

supplemental questionnaires to all 

parties concerning the New Subsidies 

Allegations (NSA), cross ownership, and 

other program issues. All parties timely 

responded to the Department’s 

supplemental questionnaires. 

In September and October 2011, the 

petitioner filed comments on the 

supplemental responses of LGE and 

SEC, on the NSA questionnaire 

responses, and on cross-ownership of 

respondents. On October 17, 2011, the 

Government of Korea (GOK) submitted 

to the record the public version of a 

verification report from a prior 

investigation. Also in October, SEC filed 

pre-verification corrections. On October 

27, 2011, the Department placed 

independent research on the record. On 

October 31, 2011, the Department 

placed on the record the Preliminary 

Scope Memorandum,2 prepared in the 

companion antidumping duty (AD) 

investigation. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES