alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 239 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

  2d Session
S. RES. 239

Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh, who was abducted 
  from the United States, should be returned home to her mother, Ms. 
                            Maureen Dabbagh.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 19, 1999

     Mr. Robb (for himself and Mr. DeWine) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             June 28, 2000

                Reported by Mr. Helms, without amendment

                             July 19, 2000

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Senate that Nadia Dabbagh, who was abducted 
  from the United States, should be returned home to her mother, Ms. 
                            Maureen Dabbagh.

Whereas Mr. Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh and Mrs. Maureen Dabbagh had a daughter, 
        Nadia Dabbagh, in 1990;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh and Mohamad Hisham Dabbagh were divorced in February 
        1992;
Whereas in 1993, Nadia was abducted by her father;
Whereas Mohamad Hisham fled the United States with Nadia;
Whereas the Governments of Syria and the United States have granted child 
        custody to Maureen Dabbagh and both have issued arrest warrants for 
        Mohamad Dabbagh;
Whereas Mohamad Dabbagh originally escaped to Saudi Arabia;
Whereas the Department of State believed that Nadia was residing in Syria until 
        late 1998;
Whereas the Senate passed S. Res. 293 for Nadia Dabbagh on October 21, 1998, 
        asking Syria to aid in the return of Nadia to her mother in the United 
        States;
Whereas in 1999, Syria invited Maureen Dabbagh to Syria to meet with her 
        daughter;
Whereas the Department of State believes that in 1999 Nadia was moved to Saudi 
        Arabia and is residing with Mohamad Dabbagh;
Whereas although Nadia is in Saudi Arabia, neither she nor Mohamad Dabbagh are 
        Saudi Arabian citizens;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh, with the assistance of missing children organizations, 
        has been unable to reunite with her daughter;
Whereas the Department of State, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and 
        Interpol have been unsuccessful in their attempts to bring Nadia back to 
        the United States;
Whereas Maureen Dabbagh has not seen her daughter in more than six years; and
Whereas it will take the continued effort and pressure on the part of the Saudi 
        Arabian officials to bring this case to a successful conclusion: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the Senate that the Governments 
of the United States and Saudi Arabia immediately locate Nadia and 
deliver her safely to her mother.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                       TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF

                               TC X CALIBUR, INC.


                                       I

     The  undersigned,  President  and Director of TC X Calibur,  Inc., a Nevada
corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  does hereby  certify:  I Pursuant to Section
78.390 of the Nevada  Revised  Statutes,  the Articles of  Incorporation  of the
Corporation shall be amended as follows: The Corporation's 5,480,000 outstanding
shares shall be reverse  split on the basis of one for 20,  effective  March 21,
2001.

                                       II

     The foregoing  amendment  was adopted by Unanimous  Consent of the Board of
Directors  pursuant to Section  78.315 of the Nevada  Revised  Statutes,  and by
Consent of the Majority  Stockholder's  pursuant to Section 78.320 of the Nevada
Revised Statutes.


                                      III

     Pursuant to resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors and a Majority of
the Stockholder's as set forth in Paragraph II above, the 5,480,001  outstanding
shares  of the  Corporation  were  reverse  split on a basis of 1 for 20,  while
retaining the  authorized  shares at 50,000,000  and the par value at $0.001 per
share, with appropriate adjustments being made in the additional paid in capital
and stated capital accounts of the Corporation,  and with all fractional  shares
being  rounded  up to the  nearest  whole  share,  provided,  however,  that  no
stockholder,  computed on a per stock  certificate  of record  basis,  currently
owning 100 or more  shares  shall be reduced to less than 100 shares as a result
of the reverse split and that no stockholder owning less than 100 shares, on the
per stock  certificate  of record basis on the effective  date hereof,  shall be
affected by the reverse split;  provided,  that all  fractional  shares shall be
rounded up to the nearest  whole share,  and that these shares shall be provided
by the Company.

                                       IV

     The number of shares entitled to vote on the amendment was 5,480,001.

                                        V

     The number of shares voted in favor of the  amendment was  2,914,000,  with
none opposing and none abstaining.


     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I Kenneth J. White,  President and Director and Michael
S. Smith, Secretary,  Treasurer and Director of the Company have subscribed this
document and do hereby  affirm,  under penalty of perjury,  that the  statements
contained  herein  have been  examined by me and are true and correct as of this
5th day of March, 2001.



                                    By/S/ Kenneth J. White
                                    _______________________________________
                                    Kenneth J. White, President and Director


                                    By/S/ Kenneth J. White
                                    _______________________________________
                                    Michael S. Smith, Secretary, Treasurer
                                    and Director

                                        2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 90 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.90
                                        Agreed to March 14, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. USE OF THE ROTUNDA OF THE CAPITOL.

    The rotunda of the United States Capitol is authorized to be used 
on January 20, 2001, by the Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural 
Ceremonies in connection with the proceedings and ceremonies conducted 
for the inauguration of the President-elect and the Vice President-
elect of the United States.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Geraldine ASHWORTH.

No. 87-K-1058.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Ashworth, Geraldine; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR87-0044; Parish of Beauregard, 36th Judicial District Court, No. CR-306-86.

Prior report: La.App., 505 So.2d 260.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph R. Vicente, President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.





Date: August 14, 2015
By:
/s/ Joseph R. VicenteName: Joseph R. VicenteTitle: President and Principal Financial and Accounting
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DECEMBER 31,
1997 10-K REPORT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           12778
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             705
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      51944
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           51676
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             52182
<LOANS>                                         373269
<ALLOWANCE>                                       3285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  509778
<DEPOSITS>                                      417011
<SHORT-TERM>                                     50164
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3574
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         49
<COMMON>                                          2389
<OTHER-SE>                                       36591
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  509778
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  30579
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 6606
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   337
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 37522
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               15457
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17217
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            20305
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1520
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  99
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  14121
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7891
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        7891
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4897
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                       5902
<LOANS-PAST>                                       272
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3389
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     1808
<RECOVERIES>                                       184
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 3285
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              3285
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Dennis PATTERSON v. Hilton BUTLER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0915.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Patterson, Dennis; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus, and habeas corpus; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 48148.

Granted. The application is transferred to the 19th Judicial District Court for consideration in light of *State v. Counterman,*475 So.2d 336 (La.1985).
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


August 1, 2005


 


Mr. William Aliber


Chief Financial Officer


Crown Media


6430 South Fiddlers Green Circle


Greenwood Village, CO 80111


 


Dear Mr. Aliber,


 


Pursuant to your request, Hallmark Cards, Incorporated confirms to you
that Hallmark Cards will not instruct its wholly-owned subsidiaries to demand,
nor will Hallmark Cards or any of its wholly-owned subsidiaries demand payment
from Crown Media on any of the following obligations until August 31,
2006, at the earliest:


 


$75.0 million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon
from time to time


$400.0 million Note payable to HC Crown plus accrued interest thereon
from time to time


$100.0 million payables to Hallmark Entertainment Holdings incurred in
conjunction with the library transaction


$150.0 million of license fees payable to Hallmark Entertainment
Distribution (HED) Company


 


It would be Hallmark’s intent to re-evaluate the loan repayment schedule if
all or substantially all of the assets of Crown Media were sold to a third
party prior to August 31, 2006.


 


Finally, in the event that at any time prior to May 31, 2006 Crown
Media’s banks draw on the Letter of Credit provided by Citibank N.A. in support
of Crown Media’s Revolving Credit Agreement,, Hallmark will not request
reimbursement from Crown Media for such amounts prior to August 31, 2006.
It would be Hallmark’s intent to re-evaluate this repayment schedule if
all or substantially all of the assets of Crown Media were sold to a third
party prior to August 31, 2006.


 


Hallmark is agreeing to the above items in exchange for Crown Media
agreeing to convert HED License Fees into an interest bearing debt item with
interest being assessed at a rate equal to Crown Media bank facilities in
existence (presently, Libor plus 300). 
As an alternative to the Fees becoming interest bearing, Crown Media can
elect to increase its Bank facility (subject to a Hallmark Guarantee) and repay
all HED obligations with borrowings.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


	
  /s/ ROBERT DRUTEN

  	
   

  	
  /s/ WILLIAM ALIBER

  	
   

  
	
  Robert Druten

  	
  William Aliber

  
	
  Chief Financial
  Officer

  	
  Chief Financial
  Officer
Docket Number: FAA-2011-0647

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 8-3-10

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer 8-3-10

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8-3-10

ATA M Lopez 8-3-10
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Roy L. DOUGLAS.

No. 89-KK-1329.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Douglas, Roy L.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 21109-KW; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 144,-030.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

JPS INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JPS Industries, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael L. Fulbright




Michael L. Fulbright
Chairman of the Board, President andChief Executive Officer


January 29, 2003
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60227 Summary Calendar

WARDELL ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CALLIE DANTZLER, individually and in her official capacity; JOHN DONNELLY, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:97-CV-867-BN

- - - - - - - - - - March 4, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Wardell Andrews, Mississippi state prisoner # R-0460, argues that the district court abused it discretion in dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous and/or for failure to state a claim. He argues that he was denied his rights, including his right to privacy, under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments as a result of a female guard subjecting him to a strip search.Andrews also argues that his rights were violated as a result of

female guards being permitted to view prisoners using the restroom and taking showers. We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the Spears hearing and the briefs of the parties, and have determined that the district court’s dismissal of the complaint must be VACATED IN PART and the case REMANDED for further consideration of Andrews’ claim concerning the strip search. The district court prematurely dismissed the case without determining that a legitimate security interest of the prison was served by the female guard conducting the strip search. See Elliott v. Lynn , 38 F.3d 188, 191-92 (5th Cir. 1994). This court has previously indicated that there is no constitutional violation if female guards are employed in guard towers giving a full view of males taking showers. See Letcher
v. Turner , 968 F.2d 508, 510 (5th Cir. 1992). Therefore, the dismissal of the portion of Andrews’ complaint complaining about female guards in the tower viewing inmates in the rest room and showers is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,614,272
<SECURITIES>                                   256,076
<RECEIVABLES>                                  843,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,713,597
<PP&E>                                       5,905,410
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,824,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,676
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,621,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,794,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,501,159
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               799,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                698,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            698,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   698,307
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 91 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 91

 Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of 
  the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former 
                             Soviet Union.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2000

Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Gorton, Mr. Lott, Mr. Helms, Mr. Campbell, 
Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Smith of 
     Oregon, Mr. Robb, and Mr. Fitzgerald) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of 
  the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former 
                             Soviet Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible incorporation of the 
        Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the former Soviet 
        Union;
Whereas the declaration on March 11, 1990, of the reestablishment of full 
        sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Lithuania led to the 
        disintegration of the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Lithuania since then has successfully built democracy, ensured human and 
        minority rights, the rule of law, developed a free market economy, 
        implemented exemplary relations with neighboring countries, and 
        consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free 
        and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and 
        the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
Whereas Lithuania, as a result of the progress of its political and economic 
        reforms, has made, and continues to make, a significant contribution 
        toward the maintenance of international peace and stability by, among 
        other actions, its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in 
        Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby----
            (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occasion of the tenth 
        anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence and the 
        leading role it played in the disintegration of the former 
        Soviet Union; and
            (2) commends Lithuania for its success in implementing 
        political and economic reforms, which may further speed the 
        process of that country's integration into European and Western 
        institutions.
                                 <all>
```