alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             298
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      472
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                        362
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,421
<PP&E>                                           3,446
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,578
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,807
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                4
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           381
<OTHER-SE>                                         386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,578
<SALES>                                          1,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,585
<CGS>                                              744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,424)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,424)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,424)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of U.S. Premium Beef, LLC (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the period ended May 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott J. Miller, ChiefReporting and Compliance Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Scott J. Miller                                                                                     |
|   |   |                                                                                                    |
|   |   | Scott J. Miller*Chief Reporting and Compliance Officer*

*(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

Date: July 10, 2009
#### Hector PEREZ, Appellant, v. Margaret K. BRANDT, Appellee.

No. 87-2165.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Gerald E. Rosser; Robert M. Geller, Miami, for appellant.

Rhea P. Grossman; Lanza & O’Connor and William R. Lemos, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Nelson v. Shell Oil Co.,*396 So.2d 752 (Fla. 3d DCA), *review denied,*407 So.2d 1104 (Fla.1981).
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 119 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 119

   Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United Nations 
                  General Assembly Resolution ES-10/6.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 1999

 Mr. Smith of Oregon (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Brownback, and Mr. 
 Lautenberg) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             June 30, 1999

                Reported by Mr. Helms, without amendment

                              July 1, 1999

                        Considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the Senate with respect to United Nations 
                  General Assembly Resolution ES-10/6.

Whereas in an Emergency Special Session, the United Nations General Assembly 
        voted on February 9, 1999, to pass Resolution ES-10/6, ``Illegal Israeli 
        Actions In Occupied East Jerusalem And The Rest Of The Occupied 
        Palestinian Territory'', to convene for the first time in 50 years the 
        parties of the Fourth Geneva Conference for the Protection of Civilians 
        in Time of War;
Whereas such resolution unfairly places full blame for the deterioration of the 
        Middle East Peace Process on Israel and dangerously politicizes the 
        Geneva Convention, which was established to deal with critical 
        humanitarian crises; and
Whereas such vote is intended to prejudge direct negotiations, put additional 
        and undue pressure on Israel to influence the results of those 
        negotiations, and single out Israel for unprecedented enforcement 
        proceedings which have never been invoked against governments with 
        records of massive violations of the Geneva Convention: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) commends the Department of State for the vote of the 
        United States against United Nations General Assembly 
        Resolution ES-10/6 affirming that the text of such resolution 
        politicizes the Fourth Geneva Convention which was primarily 
        humanitarian in nature;
            (2) urges the Department of State to continue its efforts 
        against convening the conference; and
            (3) urges the Swiss government, as the depositary of the 
        Geneva Convention, not to convene a meeting of the Fourth 
        Geneva Convention.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Frederick F. Wolfe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |             |
|-------------------------|------------------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |
|                    |
| Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |
|                    | November 6, 2006 |   |
|                         |                  |  |  |

 

----
#### CAMBRIDGE CORNER CORP. v. Gennifer MENARD d/b/a Made For Kids, Inc.

No. 88-CC-0036.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Menard, Gennifer d/b/a; Made for Kids, Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; Parish of St. John the Baptist, 40th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 19-820, 19-885; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CW-0868.

Granted.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Tony Ray EVANS.

No. 87-K-2285.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Evans, Tony Ray; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18721-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 132-104.

Prior report: La.App., 512 So.2d 615.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2004 to which this certification isbeing furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date: November 12, 2004** |                           |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------------|
|                        | /s/ Dale B. Herbst             |   |
|                        | Name: Dale B. Herbst           |
|                        | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-BB69

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Reopening of comment period.

      ( print page 14506)    

# SUMMARY:

This action reopens the comment period of a notice published on December 21, 2011. The original comment period on the notice closed at 5 p.m., E.S.T., March 1, 2012; however, the Council's Executive Committee voted to reopen the comment period an additional 60 days. This notice reopens the comment period to 5 p.m., E.S.T., April 30, 2012.

# DATES:

Written comments must be received on or before 5 p.m., E.S.T., on April 30, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Travis Ford, Fishery Management Specialist, 978-281-9233.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

NMFS published a NOI to prepare an EIS and announced public scoping meetings for the Council's Amendment 18 to the Northeast Multispeces Fishery Management Plan on December 21, 2011 (76 FR 79153). The comment period for the subject document closed on March 1, 2012. The Council's Executive Committee voted to reopen the comment period an additional 60 days. The closing date for comments has been extended to 5 p.m., E.S.T., April 30, 2012.

Authority:16 U.S.C. 1801*et seq.*

Dated: March 6, 2012.

Emily H. Menashes,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2012-5919 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine 
Program Advisory Committee will meet on April 17, 2012, at the Sheraton 
Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia, from 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic 
information to optimize medical care of Veterans, and to enhance 
development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant 
to Veterans.
    The Committee will receive program updates, and will continue to 
provide insight into optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic 
information into its health care program while applying appropriate 
ethical oversight and protecting the privacy of Veterans. The meeting 
focus will be on policies, regulations, and implications for the 
incorporation of genomic data, particularly whole genome data, into 
health care and clinical decision-making. The meeting will also receive 
an update on the status of the ongoing Million Veteran Program.
    The Committee will receive public comments at 3 p.m. Comments are 
limited to 5 minutes each. Individuals who speak are invited to submit 
a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the official 
meeting record. Members of the public may also submit written 
statements for the Committee's review to Dr. Sumitra Muralidhar, 
Designed Federal Officer, Office of Research and Development (10P9B), 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4e7c1d9ddc0c6d59ad9c1c6d5d8ddd0dcd5c6f4c2d59ad3dbc2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7d2e081014090f1c5310080f1c111419151c0f3d0b1c531a120b">[email protected]</span></a>. Any member of the 
public wishing to attend or seeking additional information should 
contact Dr. Muralidhar at (202) 443-5679.

    By direction of the Secretary.

    Dated: March 16, 2012.
Vivian Drake,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6845 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

                 AMENDMENT TO COST AND EXPENSE SHARING AGREEMENT

         This Amendment is made as of the 1st day of March, 2001, by and between
Benson Mineral Group, Inc. ("BMG") and United States Exploration, Inc.
("Company").

                                    RECITALS

         BMG and Company are parties to a Cost and Expense Sharing Agreement
dated August 7, 1997, as amended by a letter agreement dated February 21, 2000
(the "Agreement"). The term of the Agreement ends upon the termination of the
Executive Employment Agreement between Company and Bruce D. Benson. In order to
assure Company a reasonable period to make other arrangements to obtain the
facilities, personnel and services that it may be obtaining under the Agreement
at the time of termination, the parties wish to provide for advance notice to
Company of the termination of the Agreement.

                                    AGREEMENT

         Accordingly, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein,
and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, BMG and Company agree that the first sentence of
Section 8 of the Agreement is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

         This Agreement shall remain in effect until the later of (a) the
         termination of the Executive Employment Agreement of even date herewith
         between Bruce D. Benson and the Company, as from time to time amended,
         or (b) the date specified in a written notice to Company from BMG,
         which date shall not be less than 60 days after such notice is given.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
day and year first above written.

                                    BENSON MINERAL GROUP, INC.


                                    By:  /s/ Bruce D. Benson
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                             Bruce D. Benson, President


                                    UNITED STATES EXPLORATION, INC.


                                    By: /s/ F. Michael Murphy
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                            F. Michael Murphy, Vice President
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Dale B. Herbst, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of WII Components, Inc.;

2.             Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge,the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.             Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.             Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a.             All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.             Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| **Date: May 23, 2007** |                                              |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                   | /s/  Dale B. Herbst                               |   |
|                   | Dale  B. Herbst                                   |
|                   | Chief Financial Officer,  Treasurer and Secretary |

 

1

----
Not for Publication in West’s Federal Reporter - 

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-2203

KENNETH JACKSON,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

LUIS SPENCER,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Rya W. Zobel, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Jackson on brief pro se.

Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, and Cathryn A. Neaves,

Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

June 12, 2003
-2-

Per Curiam. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and

the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons

stated in the district court's memorandum of decision, dated

August 12, 2002.

We reject appellant's contention that his habeas

petition was dismissed by the district court without notice and

an opportunity to be heard. Appellant, in fact, filed an

opposition to the state's motion to dismiss, which the court

considered. Although appellant sought to file a second

response to the motion to dismiss, the district court did not

abuse its discretion in refusing that request. Further, there

was no abuse of discretion in denying appellant's motion

seeking an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Sunrise Technologies International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-82314,
33-53466 and 33-53448) of our report dated March 6, 1998 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Sunrise
Technologies International, Inc., as of December 31, 1997, and for the year then
ended, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 



 
San Jose, California
April 6, 1998