alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17459-17460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XB106


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Whiting Oversight Committee on April 
17, 2012 to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the 
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be 
brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if 
appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Tuesday, April 17, 2012 at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Hotel Providence, 139 
Mathewson Street, Providence, RI 02903; telephone: (401) 861-8000; fax: 
(401) 454-4306.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

[[Page 17460]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Oversight Committee will choose final 
alternatives for Draft Amendment 19, based on public hearing input and 
analysis of impacts. The draft alternatives include annual limits on 
catch and landings by fishery program and/or stock, in-season and post-
season accountability measures including incidental possession limits, 
year-round red hake possession limits, and monitoring and specification 
procedures. These final alternatives will be recommended for approval 
at the April 24-26 Council meeting. Other matters relative to whiting 
or skate management may also be discussed.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 21, 2012.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-7164 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### Myriam ROBINSON v. Pierre G. VILLERE.

No. 87-C-1072.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Robinson, Myriam; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6732; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D”, No. 85-4699.

*69Prior report: La.App., 505 So.2d 280.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000846899
<NAME> GRACE DEVELOPMENT, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         102,481
<SECURITIES>                                 3,700,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,040,550
<PP&E>                                       2,661,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 263,423
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,598,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,206,819
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,270,195
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,598,815
<SALES>                                        679,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               679,415
<CGS>                                          668,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,647,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             169,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,095,092)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,095,092)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,095,092)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**




**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
      Boetius, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Index Oil and Gas Inc. and will be retained by Index Oil and Gas Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





*/s/
                Andrew Boetius*
              
              Andrew
                Boetius
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (and
                acting Principal Accounting Officer)
              
              Date:
                November 14, 2007
#### JERRY DALMASO *v.*DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 839 (AC 16660), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*924The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15911.

*Mark M. Wrenn,*in support of the petition.

*Robert L. Marconi,*assistant attorney general, in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998

> “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff refused to take the blood alcohol test within the meaning of General Statutes § 14-227b (f) (3)?”
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 123 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

<DOC>

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 123

  To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of 
                   Candis Ray v. John Edwards, et al.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 1999

 Mr. Daschle submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  To authorize representation of Members of the Senate in the case of 
                   Candis Ray v. John Edwards, et al.

Whereas, in the case of Candis O. Ray v. John Edwards, et al., Case No. 99-CV-
        1104-EGS, pending in the United States District Court for the District 
        of Columbia, the plaintiff has named as defendants Senator Trent Lott 
        and Senator John Edwards; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Members of the Senate in civil actions 
        relating to their official responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
Senator Lott and Senator Edwards in the case of Candis O. Ray v. John 
Edwards, et al.
                                 <all>
```
#### PINE TOP INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. FLECK & ASSOCIATES, INC. and Charles Fleck, Appellees.

Nos. 85-2633, 86-929.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 15, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1987.

Ponzoli & Wassenberg, Steven R. Berger and William G. Liston, Miami, for appellant.

Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s final judgment is affirmed in all respects. The trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees, consolidated with the final judgment for purposes of this appeal, is affirmed except to the extent that it includes fees for services performed by non-lawyers. *See ABD Management Corp. v. Robert L. Turchin, Inc.,*490 So.2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *Bill Rivers Trailers, Inc. v. Miller,*489 So.2d 1139 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We reverse and remand the attorney’s fees award to the trial court to reduce the award by the amount representing the recovery for services performed by non-lawyer personnel.
#### STATE ex rel. Saul WHITTAKER v. Edwin A. LOMBARD, Clerk.

No. 86-KH-1224.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Whittaker, Saul; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 252-551; Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 293-843; Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, Nos. 258-286, 279-661; Criminal District Court, Div. “M”, No. 277-835.

Denied. Moot.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                              ESSEX BANCORP, INC.

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
             Quarterly Unaudited Computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                       Year Ended December 31, 2000
                                   -------------------------------------
                                     1st       2nd       3rd       4th
                                   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter
                                   -------   -------   -------   -------
                                              (in thousands)
<S>                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Net income                         $  179    $  287    $  305    $3,101
Preferred stock dividends            (519)     (528)     (536)     (560)
                                   ------    ------    ------    ------
Net (loss) income available
 to common shareholders            $ (340)   $ (241)   $ (231)   $2,541
                                   ======    ======    ======    ======
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding:
 Basic                              1,061     1,061     1,061     1,061
 Diluted                            1,061     1,061     1,061     3,236




                                      Year Ended December 31, 1999
                                   -------------------------------------
                                     1st       2nd       3rd       4th
                                   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter   Quarter
                                   -------   -------   -------   -------
                                             (in thousands)
Net income                         $   30    $  106    $  608    $1,416
Preferred stock dividends            (475)     (482)     (491)     (511)
                                   ------    ------    ------    ------
Net (loss) income available
 to common shareholders            $ (445)   $ (376)   $  117    $  905
                                   ======    ======    ======    ======
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding:
 Basic                              1,061     1,061     1,061     1,061
 Diluted                            1,061     1,061     5,094     4,129

</TABLE>

                                       1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 212 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. RES. 212

 To designate August 1, 2000, as ``National Relatives as Parents Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            November 1, 1999

   Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Byrd, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. 
Sessions and Mr. Cochran) submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             July 27, 2000

             Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To designate August 1, 2000, as ``National Relatives as Parents Day''.

Whereas children are this Nation's most valuable resource;
Whereas the most important responsibility for this Nation's lawmakers and 
        citizens is the protection and care of children;
Whereas in order to ensure the future success of this Nation, children must be 
        taught values that will help them lead happy, healthy, and productive 
        lives;
Whereas the family unit is most suitable to provide the special care and 
        attention needed by children;
Whereas this year, many children will suffer from child abuse, neglect, poor 
        nutrition, and insufficient child care, all of which jeopardize the 
        well-being of young children and the opportunity for a fulfilling and 
        successful adulthood;
Whereas extended family members, willing to open their hearts and homes to 
        children whose immediate families are in crises, play an indispensable 
        role in helping those children heal by providing them with a stable and 
        secure environment in which they can grow and develop;
Whereas approximately 520,000 children are currently under the care and guidance 
        of foster parents--about 150,800, or 29 percent, of whom are children 
        living in foster homes with extended family members who care for these 
        children and provide them with a positive home environment; and
Whereas ``National Relatives as Parents Day'' is an appropriate occasion to 
        recognize the dedication, compassion, and selflessness of extended 
        family members who willingly assume the often thankless responsibility 
        of providing a relative child with a family and home: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the Senate--
            (1) designates August 1, 2000, as ``National Relatives as 
        Parents Day''; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 
        calling on the people of the United States to observe 
        ``National Relatives as Parents Day'' with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I,Frederick F. Wolfe, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Qof Real Mex Restaurants, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: May 12,2008

 

 
| /s/ Frederick F. Wolfe  |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Frederick F. Wolfe      |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 

----
#### David L. HEILMAN, Appellant, v. ANCHOR MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., Margaret M. Musial, et al., Appellees.

No. 4-86-2521.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

*51Stephen L. Cook, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Roger D. Bear of Anderson & Rush, Orlando, for appellee-Anchor Mortg. Services, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Heilman v. Suburban Coastal Corp.,*506 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 154 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.154
                                      Agreed to October 30, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

Whereas in 1982, after a period of 28 years, the Congress of the United 
  States resumed the United States commemorative coin programs;
Whereas since 1982, 37 of the Nation's worthy institutions, 
  organizations, foundations, and programs have been commemorated under 
  the coin programs;
Whereas since 1982, the Nation's coin collectors have purchased nearly 
  49,000,000 commemorative coins that have yielded nearly 
  $1,800,000,000 in revenue and more than $407,000,000 in surcharges 
  benefitting a variety of deserving causes;
Whereas the United States Capitol has benefitted from the commemorative 
  coin surcharges that have supported such commendable projects as the 
  restoration of the Statue of Freedom atop the Capitol dome, the 
  furtherance of the development of the United States Capitol Visitor 
  Center, and the planned National Garden at the United States Botanic 
  Gardens on the Capitol grounds;
Whereas surcharges from the year 2000 coin program commemorating the 
  Library of Congress bicentennial benefit the Library of Congress 
  bicentennial programs, educational outreach activities (including 
  schools and libraries), and other activities of the Library of 
  Congress; and
Whereas the United States Capitol Visitor Center commemorative coin 
  program will commence in January 2001, with the surcharges designated 
  to further benefit the Capitol Visitor Center: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Congress of the United States acknowledges and salutes the 
ongoing generosity, loyalty, and significant role that coin collectors 
have played in supporting our Nation's meritorious charitable 
organizations, foundations, institutions, and programs, including the 
United States Capitol, the Library of Congress, and the United States 
Botanic Gardens.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6161

JESSE J. TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-680-7) Submitted: March 25, 1999 Decided: March 31, 1999 Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse J. Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jesse Turner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Turner v. Warden , No. CA-98-680-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED