alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 83 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 83

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Islamic Republic of Iran held parliamentary elections on February 
        18, 2000;
Whereas more than 75 percent of the approximately 39,000,000 eligible voters 
        cast ballots in the elections;
Whereas preliminary results indicate that reformers have won a parliamentary 
        majority, freeing Iran's parliament, the Majlis, of hard-line domination 
        for the first time since the 1979 Iranian revolution;
Whereas reformers won elections despite concerted efforts by hard-line Iranian 
        clergy to ban reformist forces from the ballot; and
Whereas the elections show a clear preference by a majority of Iranian voters 
        for democracy, rule of law, and improved relations with Western nations: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) commends the people of Iran for their commitment to the 
        democratic process;
            (2) congratulates reformist parliamentarians on their 
        recent electoral victory;
            (3) reaffirms the desire of the United States to see free, 
        democratic political development, the restoration of the rule 
        of law, and full civil and political rights for all Iranians; 
        and
            (4) calls on the Government of Iran to rejoin the community 
        of nations and renounce terrorism, opposition to the Middle 
        East peace process, and the development and acquisition of 
        weapons of mass destruction.

            Passed the Senate February 24, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 83

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Commending the people of Iran for their commitment to the democratic 
    process and positive political reform on the occasion of Iran's 
                        parliamentary elections.
```
#### Vera OGERON, et al. v. Lester DOMINGO, et al.

No. 89-CC-0693.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Domingo, Lester; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District *900Court, Div. “B”, No. 88-5278; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-0284.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny WALKER.

No. 87-KH-1242.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 26, 1988.

In re Walker, Johnny; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of De-Soto, 11th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 56791; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19124-KW.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Randy J. LESTER v. 24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, DIVISION “B” (F), JEFFERSON PARISH, Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-1807.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Lester, Randy J.; applying for remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-KH-534; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 78-1874, 261-191.

Denied.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       People's Savings Financial Corp.
                  COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                    (in thousands except per share amounts)



                                                  Year ended December 31,
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  1995    1994    1993
                                                  ----    ----    ----
Net income - primary and fully diluted            $3,389  $3,565  $4,752
--------------------------------------         
                                               
Weighted Average Common Stock and Common       
----------------------------------------       
 Equivalent Stock                              
 ----------------                              
                                               
Weighted average common stock outstanding          1,954   1,996   2,022
                                               
Assumed conversion (as of the beginning of     
each period or upon issuance during a period)  
of stock options outstanding at the end of     
each period                                           33      26      27 
                                                  ------  ------  ------ 
Weighted average common stock outstanding      
 - primary                                         1,987   2,022   2,049 
                                                  ======  ======  ====== 
                                               
Weighted average common stock outstanding          1,954   1,996   2,022
                                               
Assumed conversion (as of the beginning of     
each period or upon issuance during a period)  
of stock options outstanding at the end of     
each period                                           33      25      28
                                                  ------  ------  ------ 
                                               
Weighted average common stock outstanding      
 - fully diluted                                   1,987   2,021   2,050
                                                  ======  ======  ====== 
                                               
Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share
-----------------------------------------------
                                               
Primary                                            $1.71   $1.76   $2.32 
                                                  ======  ======  ======  
                                               
Fully diluted                                      $1.71   $1.76   $2.32 
                                                  ======  ======  ======
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1988-C, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 1997 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         22,623
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               49,603
<PP&E>                                         1,536,049
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,274,751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 310,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,797
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     308,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   310,901
<SALES>                                        96,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               97,110
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  37,032<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            35,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   35,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT
 
 I, Chien
Chih Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Rotoblock Corporation, hereby certify
that:
 
 (1)  I have
reviewed this quarterly report of Rotoblock Corporation;
 
 (2)  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Rotoblock Corporation as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):
 
 (a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Rotoblock Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of Rotoblock Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during Rotoblock Corporation's most recent
fiscal quarter (Rotoblock Corporation's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 (5)  Rotoblock
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Rotoblock Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Rotoblock
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Rotoblock Corporation's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Rotoblock Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.
  
 Dated: September
14, 2009 ROTOBLOCK
CORPORATION
 
 /s/ Chien
Chih Liu
 By: Chien
Chih Liu, Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                                                                      ----------


                       STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
                       -----------------------------------
                                 (In thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                      Years Ended December 31,

                                                      2001         2000         1999           1998         1997
                                                      ----         ----         ----           ----         ----
<S>                                                 <C>          <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>
Fixed charges, as defined:
    Interest on long-term debt, amortization of
     debt discount, and interest component of
     rent expense                                    $12,423      $11,782      $11,019       $ 10,878      $  3,842
                                                     =======      =======      =======       ========      ========
Earnings, as defined:
    Income (loss) before income taxes               $ (5,597)    $ (5,323)     $ 8,364        $ 4,336      $(15,208)

    Total fixed charges (as shown above)              12,423       11,782       11,019         10,878         3,842
                                                      ------       ------     --------       --------      --------

    Earnings available for fixed                      $6,826       $6,459      $19,383        $15,214      $(11,366)
                                                      ------       ------      -------         ======      ========
charges
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preferred dividend requirements                        .55x         .55x         1.8x          1.4x           -
                                                       ====         ====         ====          ====           =
</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILTON STATION CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, 

DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES,

AND MOBILE HOMES,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2919

[October 3, 2019]

Administrative appeal from the Department of Business and 

Professional Regulation, Division of Florida Condominiums, Timeshares, 

and Mobile Homes; L.T. Case No. 2017-020348.

Darrin B. Gursky of Gursky Ragan, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Ross Marshman, Chief Appellate Counsel, Department of Business and

Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 248

To designate the week of May 7, 2000, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers

and Employees Week’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31, 2000

Mr. ROBB (for himself, Mr. ASHCROFT, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

LAUTENBERG, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. CLELAND, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DODD, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KERRY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. REID, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SPECTER,

Mr. TORRICELLI, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. KERREY, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. SANTORUM, Ms. COLLINS,

Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. BOND, Mr. BYRD, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. SHELBY,

Ms. SNOWE, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr.

BURNS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. ENZI, Mr. GORTON, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, Mr. MACK, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. SMITH

of New Hampshire, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. THURMOND, and Mr.

HUTCHINSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

MAY 4, 2000

Committee discharged; considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate the week of May 7, 2000, as ‘‘National

Correctional Officers and Employees Week’’.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a

crucial component of our criminal justice system;
2

SRES 248 ATS

Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting

the rights of the public to be safeguarded from criminal

activity;

Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care,

custody, and dignity of the human beings charged to

their care; and

Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face danger in their daily work lives:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate designates the week of May

2 7, 2000, as ‘‘National Correctional Officers and Employ3 ees Week’’. The President is authorized and requested to

4 issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United

5 States to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies

6 and activities.

Æ
#### Daniel W. BAKER v. Rickey A. HARDIN.

No. 58351.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 15, 1989.

Charles D. Easley, Jr., Walters & Easley, Columbus, for appellant.

Douglas C. Stone, Stone & Hayes, Columbus, for appellee.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lowndes County; Ernest L. Brown, Judge.

*1369Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ANDERSON and PITTMAN, JJ.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.
#### Richard FABIAN a/k/a Fabian Mejia Espinosa, Appellant, v. CITY OF MIAMI and Detective Ruben Cantillo, Appellees.

No. 87-916.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 28, 1987.

Richard Fabian, in pro. per.

Lucia A. Dougherty, City Atty., and Alejandro Vilarello, Asst. City Atty., for appel-lees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Toledo Park Homes v. Grant,*447 So.2d 343 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); *Leatherwood v. City of Key West,*347 So.2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), *cert. denied,*358 So.2d 131 (Fla.1978); § 95.11(3)(o), Fla. Stat. (1977). Appellant’s other point lacks merit.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of IdentiPHI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christer Bergman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date:October 31, 2008
#### Armando S. VARELA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2654.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Lee Weissenborn of Law Offices of Lee Weissenborn, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Landry, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Armando S. Varela, challenges his conviction and sentence for trafficking in cocaine of 400 grams or more. We find no merit to defendant’s first two points. In his third point, defendant contends that he was denied his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel. Generally, such claims are not reviewable on direct appeal but are more properly raised on a motion for post-conviction relief. *State v. Barber,*301 So.2d 7 (Fla.1974).

Accordingly, we affirm defendant's conviction and sentence without prejudice to defendant seeking relief on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No. 33-44036 on Form S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration Statement No.
33-44035 on Form S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration Statement No.
33-55094 on Form S-3 dated November 25, 1992, Registration Statement No.
33-56856 on Form S-8 dated January 8, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-72512
on Form S-8 dated December 3, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-81314 on Form
S-8 dated July 7, 1994, Registration Statement No. 333-728 on Form S-3 dated
January 30, 1996, Registration Statement No. 33-85754 on Form S-3 dated January
30, 1996 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), Registration Statement No. 333-15123
on Form S-3 dated October 30, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-18237 on Form
S-8 dated December 19, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-18239 on Form S-8
dated December 19, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-30597 on Form S-3 dated
June 30, 1997, Registration Statement No. 333-44407 on Form S-3 dated January
14, 1998 and Registration Statement No. 333-48635 on Form S-3 dated March 25,
1998, and Registration Statement No. 333-83035 on Form S-8 dated July 16, 1999,
of our report dated March 5, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of VSI Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the Company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.



/s/  Grant Thornton LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
January 10, 2000
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1416

_____________________________

DANA PETERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

October 3, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The trial court committed fundamental error in finding that 

Appellant was competent to proceed based on defense counsel’s 

stipulation where there is no indication that the trial court 

reviewed the expert’s report, made an independent determination 

that Appellant’s competency had been restored, or entered a 

written order to that effect. See Davis v. State, 44 Fla. L. Weekly 

D2059 (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 13, 2019); Robinson v. State, 250 So. 3d 

777, 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018); Zern v. State, 191 So. 3d 962, 964-65 

(Fla. 1st DCA 2016). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a 

retroactive determination of competency, if possible. Davis, 44 Fla. 

L. Weekly at D2059; Robinson, 250 So. 3d at 778-79; Zern, 191 So. 

3d at 965. If the trial court finds that Appellant was competent at 

the time he entered his plea, it must enter a nunc pro tunc written 
2

order memorializing that finding with no change in the judgment. 

See Bowden v. State, 44 Fla. L. Weekly D2261 (Fla. 1st DCA Sept. 

9, 2019). However, if the trial court cannot make a retroactive 

determination, it must allow Appellant to withdraw his plea and 

adjudicate his present competency to proceed. Id.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.