alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Services Partners Acquisition
      Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2006 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Rahul Prakash, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      December 15, 2006




By: /s/
      Rahul
      Prakash


Rahul
      Prakash


Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
<Page>


                                                                    Exhibit 13.2



             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                    (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of DRAXIS Health Inc., a corporation incorporated under the
laws of Canada (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

         The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.


Date:    May 14, 2004                  /s/ Mark Oleksiw
---------------------------            --------------------------------------
                                       Mark Oleksiw
                                       Chief Financial Officer






         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 29

To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 1999

    Mr. Coverdell (for himself, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Cleland, and Mr. 
  Hollings) introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
To grant the consent of Congress to the boundary change between Georgia 
                          and South Carolina.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSENT OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The consent of Congress is given to the 
establishment of the boundary between the States of Georgia and South 
Carolina.
    (b) New Boundary.--The boundary referred to in subsection (a) is 
the boundary--
            (1) agreed to by the State of Georgia in Act Number 1044 
        (S.B. No. 572) approved by the Governor on April 5, 1994; and
            (2) agreed to by the State of South Carolina in Act Number 
        1315 (G.B. No. 415) approved by the Governor on May 29, 1996.
    (c) Compact.--The Acts referred to in subsection (b) are recognized 
by Congress as an interstate compact pursuant to section 10 of article 
IV of the United States Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Milton Eric DICKINSON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KP-0142.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Milton Erick Dickinson, applying for reconsideration of this Court’s Order of April 3,1987, 503 So.2d 1016; 19th Judicial District Court for the Parish of E. Baton Rouge, No. 2-77-190.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 201

Congratulating Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron on the 25th anniversary of breaking

the Major League Baseball career home run record established by Babe

Ruth and recognizing him as one of the greatest baseball players of

all time.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 12, 1999

Mr. COVERDELL (for himself Mr. CLELAND, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. SESSIONS,

Mr. KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. MACK, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. STEVENS,

Mr. LAUTENBURG, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr.

CRAIG, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. HAGEL,

Mr. BURNS, Mr. DURBIN, and Mr. SCHUMER) submitted the following

resolution; which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron on the 25th anniversary of breaking the Major League Baseball career home

run record established by Babe Ruth and recognizing

him as one of the greatest baseball players of all time.

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron hit a historic home run in

1974 to become the all-time Major League Baseball home

run leader;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron over the course of his career

created a lasting legacy in the game of baseball and continues to contribute to society through his Chasing the

Dream Foundation;
2

•SRES 201 ATS

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron hit more than 40 home runs

in 8 different seasons;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron appeared in 20 All-Star

games;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron was elected to the National

Baseball Hall of Fame in his first year of eligibility, receiving one of the highest vote totals (406 votes) in the

history of National Baseball Hall of Fame voting;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron was inducted into the National Baseball Hall of Fame on August 1, 1982;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron finished his career in 1976

with 755 home runs, a lifetime batting average of .305,

and 2,297 runs batted in;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron taught us to follow our

dreams;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron continues to serve the community through his various commitments to charities and

as corporate vice president of community relations for

Turner Broadcasting;

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron became one of the first African-Americans in Major League Baseball upper management, as Atlanta’s vice president of player development;

and

Whereas Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron is one of the greatest baseball

players: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the Senate—

2 (1) congratulates Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron on his

3 great achievements in baseball and recognizes Henry
3

•SRES 201 ATS

1 ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron as one of the greatest professional

2 baseball players of all time; and

3 (2) commends Henry ‘‘Hank’’ Aaron for his

4 commitment to young people, earning him a perma5 nent place in both sports history and American soci6 ety.

Æ
**Exhibit
      32**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Annual Report of MC Shipping Inc. (the “ Registrant”)
      on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”):








Each
      of
      the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
      of
      the R egistrant hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the R egistrant .









March
                17, 2006
            /s/
              Antony CrawfordAntony
                CrawfordChief
                Executive OfficerMarch
                17, 2006
            /s/
              Dominique SergentDominique
                SergentChief
                Financial Officer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William B. BODIN.

No. 87-K-1568.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Bodin, William B.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA86 1330; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 115613.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 559.

Denied.
#### GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. REITER, INC., d/b/a Rich Kids Kars, Appellee.

No. 86-1630.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 21, 1987.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1987.

Gerald Silverman, Miami, for appellant.

Richard 0. Dansoh, North Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. §§ 319.24(3), -.27, Fla.Stat. (1985); *Castner v. Ziemer,*125 So.2d 134 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Global Climate and Energy Project

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 17, 2012, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Global Climate and Energy 
Project (``GCEP'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership, nature and objective. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, 
Wilmington, DE, has been added as a party to this venture. The change 
in its nature and objectives is that the members of GCEP have amended 
the agreement between them to extend the termination of GCEP, which 
currently will terminate August 31, 2014.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and GCEP intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 12, 2003, GCEP filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 4, 
2003 (68 FR 16552).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 8, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on June 1, 2011 (76 FR 31638).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-7077 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New Frontier Media, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Weiner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






/s/ Michael Weiner
------------------------------------
Michael Weiner
Chief Executive Officer
DATED: June 14, 2004
M E M O R A N D U M 

To: File 

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region IX, Air Planning Office

Date: May 30, 2013

Concerning: EPA Proposed Rule to Approve South Coast Contingency Measure SIP Revision, 

Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 

In order to confirm that the reasonable further progress (RFP) numbers in the South Coast 

Contingency Measure SIP revision are consistent with the 2012 AQMP, we compared 2008 and 

2012 PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor emissions data from the Final 2012 Air Quality Management 

Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, December 2012 (submitted February 13, 

2013) (“2012 AQMP”) to information provided in the South Coast Air Quality Management 

District Proposed Contingency Measures for the 2007 PM2.5 SIP, October 2011 (submitted 

November 14, 2011) (“Contingency Measure SIP Revision”) The analysis confirms that the data 

from the Contingency Measure SIP Revision are consistent with the data in the 2012 AQMP.

Pollutant 2008 (data from 2012 

AQMP)1

2012 (data from 

Contingency Measure 

SIP revision)

2014 (data from 2012 

AQMP)2

NOx 757 543 506

VOC 593 479 451

PM2.5 80 72 70

SOx 54 20 18

 

1

Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, December 2012, 

Appendix III, Table A-1.

2

Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District, December 2012, 

Appendix III, Table A-2.
_______1564-09______________________________

Page is not included in this copy.

Pages 208 through 210 are not included in this

copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of
information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X___ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who prepared the response to your request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Paul GRAY.

No. 89-K-0141.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Gray, Paul; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-9246; Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 85-5278.

Prior report: La.App., 533 So.2d 1242.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

NICHOLAS CIRIO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1140

[March 5, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Cheryl Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502017CF001898C.

Jack A. Fleischman of Fleischman & Fleischman, P.A., West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A. Warner, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Saflink Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-92072, 333-74253, 033-668832 and 333-118249) on Form S-8, registration statements (Nos. 033-62430, 333-75789, 333-23467, 333-01510, 333-58575, 333-54084,
333-112287, 333-119778, 333-114594 and 333-126185) on Form S-3, registration statement (No. 333-97221) on Form S-2 and registration statement (No. 333-68642) on Form S-1 of SAFLINK Corporation of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of Saflink Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005 and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Saflink Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP



|                   
|-------------------
|Seattle, Washington
|March 16, 2006
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bedford Doyle RUFF.

No. 87-K-0911.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Ruff, Bedford Doyle; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18355-KA; Parish of Richland, 5th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 42831.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 72.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                        |        |                            
|----------------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Matthew L. Schissler  
|                        | Name:  | Matthew L. Schissler       
|                        | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
|                        |        | and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cord Blood America, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew L. Schissler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



|                        |         |                            
|----------------------- | ------- | ---------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2008 | By: /s/ | MATTHEW L. SCHISSLER       
|                        | Name:   | Matthew L. Schissler       
|                        | Title:  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                        |         | and Chief Financial Officer
#### Dennis GABEL, Appellant, v. Allan CASEY, etc., et al., Appellees. IRVING SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. Allan CASEY, as attorney ad litem for Marshall Crum, etc., Canal Insurance Company, a foreign corporation, et al., Appellees. Allan CASEY, as Attorney Ad Litem for Marshall Crum, etc., et al., Appellants, v. Marshall CRUM, Mary Crum, and Century Automotive Associates, Inc., et al., Appellees.

Nos. 4-86-2139, 4-86-2390, 87-1247.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Patrick B. Flanagan of Stephen C. McAli-ley & Associates, West Palm Beach, for appellant — Gabel.

Susan L. Gordon of Davis, Critton, Hoy & Diamond, West Palm Beach, for appellant — Irving Sav.

*54Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nu-gent, Johnson, Roth & Romano, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Casey.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Carroll & Halberg, P.A., Miami, for appellees — Crum.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Inverness Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. McDaniel,*78 So.2d 100 (Fla.1955) and § 48.181(3), Fla.Stat. (1985).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.