alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17121-17122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2012-2)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 17122]]

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the second quarter 2012 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The second quarter 2012 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.185. 
The second quarter 2012 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.520. The second quarter 
2012 RCAF-5 is 0.492.

DATES: Effective Date: April 1, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-
8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting 
the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance 
at (202) 245-0238. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.

    Decided: March 19, 2012.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Begeman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2012-7048 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
#### Roger A. CAMPBELL d/b/a Tron Computronics v. PIPE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

No. 87-C-0270.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Campbell, Roger A. d/b/a; Tron Computronics; applying for writ of certio-rari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85-CA-0895; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 73271.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 111.

Denied.
#### Ricky LATHROP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-682.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 10, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst.. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. Appellant was before the court for sentencing after he violated terms of his community control sentence. Although presented with a properly calculated sentencing guideline scoresheet the sentencing judge declined to use it; instead, he used a previously prepared, and used, scoresheet. That previously used scoresheet was erroneous, as implicitly acknowledged by the sentencing judge. The judge felt he was obliged to follow the erroneous scoresheet because appellant did not raise the issue at the first sentencing or on appeal. We disagree. Rule 3.800(a) allows the court *at any time*to correct a miscalculated scoresheet. *See State v. Whitfield,*487 So.2d 1045 (Fla.1986).

The sentence is vacated and this cause remanded for a proper sentence..

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.
#### Max NATHAN, Jr., In His Capacity as the Executor of the Succession of Herbert Nathan v. TOURO INFIRMARY; The Board of Managers of Touro Infirmary; Gordon P. Nutik, M.D.; Jane Doe and Bob Doe.

No. 87-C-0635.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Nathan, Max Jr.; Nathan, Herbert, Succ. of; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA 5319; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 851764.

Prior report: La.App., 501 So.2d 252.

Granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 6 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.6
                                      Agreed to February 9, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, as a mark of respect to the memory of R. Scott Bates, Legislative 
Clerk of the United States Senate, all flags of the United States 
located on Capitol Buildings or on the Capitol grounds shall be flown 
at half-staff on the day of his interment.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Exhibit
31.2




Certification


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act


I,
Michael Hlavsa, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this Form 10-Q of Fund.com Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:           August
14, 2008









/s/
      Michael HlavsaName:
            Michael
      HlavsaTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)). 

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 3, 2012. 

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001: 

*1. William Bradley Giblet and Lita Giblet, both of Hydro, Oklahoma, and Gaylon Vogt, Weatherford, Oklahoma,*                     to acquire control of Ryan Bancshares, Inc., parent of The First State Bank, both in Ryan, Oklahoma.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 16, 2012. 

Robert deV. Frierson, 

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6823 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Theodore Richard VIALPANDO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 82CA1170.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Oct. 11, 1984.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 15, 1984.

Certiorari Granted Feb. 4, 1985.

*1193Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Peter J. Stapp, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, Barbara S. Blackman, Chief Appellate Deputy State Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

BABCOCK, Judge.

Defendant, Theodore R. Vialpando, appeals from an adverse jury verdict finding him ineligible for release from commitment after having been found not guilty by reason of insanity. We affirm.

Defendant sought to elicit testimony from a member of the disposition committee at the Colorado State Hospital concerning the nature of his proposed conditional release and its terms and conditions. The trial court ruled the line of questioning irrelevant because the setting of terms and conditions for release is purely a judicial function. Defendant argues that this evidence is relevant under CRE 401 to the issue of defendant’s eligibility for release. We disagree.

Section 16-8-115(3)(a), C.R.S. (1983 Cum. Supp.) provides in part that: “If the ... jury finds the defendant eligible for release, the court may impose such terms and conditions as the court determines are in the best interests of the defendant and the community....” As to this defendant, the applicable test for release is “that the defendant has no abnormal mental condition which would be likely to cause him to be dangerous either to himself or to others or to the community in the reasonably foreseeable future.” Section 16-8-120(1), C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8).

In *People v. Giles,*192 Colo. 240, 557 P.2d 408 (1976), the court held that: “[T]he jury’s function ends with its determination whether or not the defendant is eligible for release. The decision whether to impose conditions on release is solely for the court.” We hold that adoption of CRE 401 did not alter the rule of *People v. Giles,*and thus, defendant’s proffered evidence was irrelevant as a matter of law.

Judgment affirmed.

BERMAN and METZGER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Cabletron Systems, Inc.:

  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-50454, 33-31572, 33-50753, 33-21391, 33-17557, 33-09029, 33-96060,
33-96058, 33-33454, 33-42490, 33-63419, 33-64311, 33-83991 and 33-54754) on
Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 33-54176 and 33-92863) on Form S-3
of Cabletron Systems, Inc. of our reports dated April 12, 2001, except for the
first paragraph of Note 16, which is as of May 23, 2001 relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Cabletron Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
March 3, 2001 and February 29, 2000, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity
and cash flows and the related schedule for each of the years in the three-
year period ended March 3, 2001, which reports are included in the March 3,
2001 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K of Cabletron Systems, Inc.

Boston, Massachusetts
June 1, 2001

                                      106
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 71

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas deliberations on establishing a ‘‘Free Trade Area of

the Americas’’ (FTAA) will help facilitate greater cooperation and understanding on trade barrier reduction

throughout the Americas;

Whereas the trade ministers of 34 countries of the Western

Hemisphere agreed in 1998 to create a permanent Secretariat in order to support negotiations on establishing the

FTAA;

Whereas the FTAA Secretariat will employ persons to provide logistical, administrative, archival, translation, publication, and distribution support for the negotiations;

Whereas the FTAA Secretariat will be funded by a combination of local resources and institutional resources from a

tripartite committee consisting of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the Organization of American

States (OAS), and the United Nations Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC);

Whereas the temporary site of the FTAA Secretariat will be

located in Miami, Florida, from 1999 until February 28,

2001, at which point the Secretariat will rotate to Panama City, Panama, until February 28, 2003, and then

rotate to Mexico City, Mexico, until February 28, 2005;
2

SCON 71 ES

Whereas by 2005 the FTAA Secretariat will have international institution status providing jobs and tremendous

economic benefits to its host city;

Whereas a permanent site for the FTAA Secretariat after

2005 will likely be selected from among the 3 temporary

host cities;

Whereas the city of Miami, Miami-Dade County, and the

State of Florida have long served as the gateway for

trade with the Caribbean and Latin America;

Whereas trade between the city of Miami, Florida, and the

countries of Latin America and the Caribbean totaled

$36,793,000,000 in 1998;

Whereas the Miami-Dade area and the State of Florida possess the necessary infrastructure, local resources, and

culture necessary for the FTAA Secretariat’s permanent

site;

Whereas the United States possesses the world’s largest economy and is the leading proponent of trade liberalization

throughout the world; and

Whereas the city of Miami, Florida, the State of Florida, and

the United States are uniquely situated among other

competing locations to host the ‘‘Brussels of the Western

Hemisphere’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 President should direct the United States representative

4 to the ‘‘Free Trade Area of the Americas’’ (FTAA) nego5 tiations to use all available means in order to secure
3

SCON 71 ES

1 Miami, Florida, as the permanent site of the FTAA Secre2 tariat after February 28, 2005.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 71

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that Miami,

Florida, and not a competing foreign city, shouldserve as the permanent location for the Secretariat of the Free Trade Area of the Americas(FTAA) beginning in 2005.
#### STATE ex rel. Barbara HICKERSON v. Johnnie JONES, Warden.

No. 87-KH-2401.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1987.

In re Hickerson, Barbara; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 244-259.

Granted for the purpose of transferring the application to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to act on relator’s application for post-conviction relief if same has been filed in the district court.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 42

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2000

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Ibanez as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Manuel L. Ibanez of Texas on 
May 4, 2000, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term 
of 6 years. The reappointment shall take effect on May 5, 2000.

            Passed the Senate April 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
From: "Muehlethaler, Eveleen T." < eveleenm@ptpc.com >

To: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Ann Crapo \ (NCASI \ )" < acrapo@src
- ncasi.org >, "A nna Henolson" < ahenolson@trinityconsultants.com >, "DeLeo, Val" < vald2@ptpc.com > Date: 05/03/2012 04:55 PM Subject: PTPC Submittal of Corrections to P&P RTR Modeli ng Input Data

Bill

Here is the information you and I discussed on Monday. My understanding is that since the docket is closed for direct submittal, that you will be sure to include this data in the record of the docket. Thank you. Attached is the r eport by Trinity Consultants summarizing the reasons for the submittal of the revised data for the Port Townsend Paper Mill. The excel revision sheet is also attached. We have highlighted the revisions in yellow. We believe that risk evaluations should b e done with the most accurate information available. We have had Trinity simulate the modeling using the HEM3 version. This work demonstrates that the original MIRs for the mill are overstated. We would encourage EPA to consider rerunning the model you are presently using incorporating these revisions. I appreciate your willingness to accept this data. Let me know if you have any questions or need any more information. Sincerely



## Eveleen Muehlethaler **Vice President -**  **Environmental Affairs Port Townsend**  **Paper Corp. 100 Mill Road**  **Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360) 379**  **- 2112**  **eveleenm@ptpc.com** This email and an y attached files are the exclusive property of Port Townsend Paper Corporation and its affiliates ('PTPC'), are de emed privileged and confidential and are intended solely for the use of the party to whom it is addressed. If you are not a named recipient or believe that you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediatel y and delete this email an d any attachments. Any

unauthorized use, reproduction or dissemination of this email is strictly prohibited. PTPC cannot accept liability for any statements made which are clearl y the sender's own and not expressly

made on its behalf. (S

ee attached file: ma ct_1626

- 1_facility_NEI42357.xls)(See attached file: PTPC Residual Risk Revision EPA Cover Letter v3.00.pdf)
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January ,29 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-01069-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.R.G., J.A.G., AND C.J.G., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 313th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2015-05307J 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an attempted appeal from the “Denial of a Motion to Stay the Adoption 

of Children Pending Filing of a Petition Filed November 8, 2016.” Appellant’s 

parental rights were terminated in a decree signed October 20, 2016. This court 

affirmed the termination of appellant’s parental rights. See In re S.R.G., No. 14-16-

00900-CV, 2017 WL 1497350, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 25, 

2017, pet. denied) (mem. op.). In this appeal appellant attempts to appeal the denial 

of a motion to stay the adoption of the children. 
2

Generally, appeals may be taken only from final judgments. Lehmann v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). When orders do not dispose of all 

pending parties and claims, the orders are not appealable unless a statutory exception 

applies. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. Jackson, 53 S.W.3d 352, 352 (Tex. 2001); Jack 

B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). In 

this case appellant timely appealed the termination decree, which was a final 

judgment. No statutory exception permits the appeal of a denial of a motion to stay 

adoption filed two years after termination of parental rights. 

On December 27, 2018, notification was transmitted to the parties of this 

court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless on or before 

January 8, 2019, appellant filed a response demonstrating grounds for continuing the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response. 

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.