alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BUILDERS GLASS & METAL, INC., Appellant, v. M.E.T. CONSTRUCTION, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 87-3092.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 26, 1988.

*989Leiby & Elder and Robert Ferencik, Miami, for appellant.

Beasley, Olle *&*Downs and Joseph W. Downs, III, Miami, for appellee.

Before BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ., and WARREN H. COBB, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Builders Glass & Metal, Inc. [Builders Glass] challenges the trial court’s entry of Final Summary Judgment in favor of M.E.T. Construction, Inc. [MET]. The trial court apparently based its ruling as to MET’s motion for summary judgment on a determination that Builders Glass had split a cause of action when it. sued MET in circuit court for wrongful termination of a contract1 and sued MET’s surety, Trans-american Premier Insurance Company in county court2 for reasonable value of the labor and services performed.

We reverse. Because the two actions did not involve the same parties, or arise out of identical facts and circumstances, *see Thermofin, Inc. v. Woodruff,*491 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), it cannot be said that a single cause of action was split.

Reversed.

1

. Builders Glass sued MET for its lost profit and for reasonable value of labor and services performed in excess of $5,000.

2

. MET was originally a party to this suit; later, Builders Glass dismissed its claim against MET.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 21 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. J. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 To designate September 29, 1999, as ``Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
                          United States Day''.

Whereas the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States was founded on 
        September 29, 1899;
Whereas the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 
        the United States will occur on September 29, 1999;
Whereas for the past 100 years, the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 
        States has made valuable contributions to the well-being of veterans of 
        the Armed Forces and to the States and their communities, and has 
        exhibited national leadership on issues of importance to all veterans of 
        the Armed Forces; and
Whereas the centennial anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign 
        Wars of the United States presents an opportunity to recognize, honor, 
        and pay tribute to the more than 2,000,000 veterans of the Armed Forces 
        represented by that organization, and to all the individuals who have 
        served in the Armed Forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That September 29, 1999, is 
designated as ``Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States Day'', 
and the President of the United States is authorized and requested to 
issue a proclamation calling upon all Government agencies and the 
people of the United States to observe the day with appropriate 
ceremonies, programs, and activities.

            Passed the Senate June 30, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                             S. J. RES. 21

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 To designate September 29, 1999, as ``Veterans of Foreign Wars of the 
                          United States Day''.
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2429 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children’s sandals and similar 

footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children’s 

sandals and similar footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN’S SANDALS AND SIMILAR 

4 FOOTWEAR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2429 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sandals and similar footwear 

of plastics, produced in one 

piece by molding, the foregoing for persons other than 

men or women (provided for 

in subheading 6402.99.27) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lillian G. TARVER.

No. 88-K-0713.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Tarver, Lillian G.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, and mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA87 0920; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 153144.

Prior report: La.App., 521 So.2d 601.

Denied.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 992

To provide technical amendments related to the Vaccine Injury Compensation

Trust Fund.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 10, 1999

Mr. DASCHLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide technical amendments related to the Vaccine

Injury Compensation Trust Fund.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS RELATED TO VAC4 CINE INJURY COMPENSATION TRUST FUND.

5 (a) REPEAL OF MUTUALLY CONFLICTING AMEND6 MENTS.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 1504 of Division C

8 of the Omnibus Consolidated and Emergency Sup9 plemental Appropriations Act, 1999 (relating to
2

•S 992 IS

1 Vaccine Injury Compensation Trust Fund) is re2 pealed.

3 (2) EFFECT OF REPEAL.—The Internal Rev4 enue Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered

5 as if the section repealed by paragraph (1) had

6 never been enacted.

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section

8 9510(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating

9 to expenditures from Trust Fund) is amended—

10 (1) by striking ‘‘August 5, 1997’’ in subpara11 graph (A) and inserting ‘‘October 21, 1998’’, and

12 (2) by striking ‘‘$9,500,000’’ in subparagraph

13 (B) and inserting ‘‘$10,000,000’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

15 subsection (b) shall take effect as if included in the Omni16 bus Consolidated and Emergency Supplemental Appro17 priations Act, 1999.

Æ
(i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 4, 2010
    /s/ ALAN D. GOLDAlan D. GoldChief Executive Officer    (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 4, 2010
    /s/ KENT GRIFFINKent GriffinChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF PRESSTEK, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                               STATE OF INCORPORATION
------------------                               ----------------------
<S>                                              <C>
North America
-------------

Lasertel, Inc.                                          Arizona
HIC, Inc.                                               New Hampshire
R/H Acquisition Corporation                             New Hampshire
Precision Acquisition Corp.                             Delaware
Precision Lithograining Corporation                     Massachusetts
SDK Realty Corp.                                        Massachusetts
ABD International, Inc.                                 Illinois
ABD Canada Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware
ABD International Company of Canada                     Canada

Europe
------

A.B. Dick of UK Limited                                 United Kingdom

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-41173

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MIGUEL GARCIA-COVARUBIAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B:97-CR-232-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Miguel Garcia-Covarubias appeals his conviction

and sentence for illegal re-entry following deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Garcia-Covarubias

argues that he was sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) for a

prior aggravated felony conviction and since he was charged and

pleaded guilty to the elements of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), the

Government should have alleged the prior aggravated felony in the

indictment. His argument is foreclosed by this court’s opinion
No. 97-41173

-2-

in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera, 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th

Cir. 1993). 

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 41 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for the appointment of Sheila E. Widnall as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Frank A. Shrontz of Washington 
on May 4, 2000, is filled by the appointment of Sheila E. Widnall of 
Massachusetts. The appointment is for a term of 6 years and shall take 
effect on May 5, 2000.

            Passed the Senate April 12, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                             S. J. RES. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

Providing for the appointment of Sheila E. Widnall as a citizen regent 
        of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.
```
#### Ruby HANKINS v. WOMAN’S HOSPITAL.

No. 87-C-2733.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1988.

In re Mississippi Valley Food Ser. — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1403; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 295372.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 217.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Richard LUNDY, Appellee.

No. 87-3237.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 30, 1988.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and W.H. Pasch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

The state appeals from the trial court’s order which dismisses the charge against Richard Lundy. We reverse.

Richard Lundy was charged by information with grand theft on June 7,1985. Due to the trial court’s heavy docket, his trial was continued twelve times. None of these continuances were attributed to the state or Lundy.

On October 26, 1987, the case was again set for trial. On that date the state made its first request for a continuance because four of its witnesses were unavailable. The trial court denied the state’s motion for a continuance and sua sponte dismissed the case.

The state appeals and argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion for a continuance without a showing of prejudice by the appellee and in dismissing the case without making an inquiry as to whether the state would proceed without its witnesses.

Although a trial court has broad discretion to grant or deny a motion for a continuance, we believe the trial court abused its discretion in denying the state’s motion and dismissing the case. This was the first continuance requested by the state and Lundy did not make a motion for discharge at the time the trial court dismissed the case.

As we stated in *State v. Hamilton,*387 So.2d 555, 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), “dismissal of an otherwise valid information is too extreme a sanction where there is no showing of prejudice or unfairness to the appel-lee.”

Accordingly, we reverse the final order and remand for further proceedings. If upon remand the state fails to present a prima facie case against Lundy, dismissal would then be appropriate.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of MangoSoft, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dale Vincent,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

By: /s/ Dale Vincent
    --------------------
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive and financial officer)
March 26, 2005


This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Exhibit 23</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>

<FONT FACE="Times"><P ALIGN="CENTER">Exhibit 23</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"> </P>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Times" SIZE=4><P ALIGN="CENTER">Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors</P>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Times"><P ALIGN="JUSTIFY"></P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 20, 2000, included in the 1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of American
Freightways Corporation.</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.</P>
<P ALIGN="JUSTIFY">We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-81623) pertaining to the American Freightways Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-78013) pertaining to the American Freightways Corporation 1999 Chairman Stock Option Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 20, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of American Freightways Corporation.</P>
<P><BR>
/s/Ernst & Young LLP<BR>
Little Rock, Arkansas<BR>
March 14, 2000</P></FONT></BODY>
</HTML>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 12925-002 and 14078-000]


FFP Project 39, LLC and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; 
Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications 
deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed 
projects to be located on the Mississippi River, in Bolivar County, 
Mississippi, and Desha County, Arkansas. The applications were filed by 
FFP Project 39, LLC for Project No. 12925-002, and Northland Power 
Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14078-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the 
Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine 
the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The 
Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided 
in section 4.37 of its regulations.\2\ The priority established by this 
drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with 
identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed 
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the 
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 
20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing 
the results of the drawing.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-701 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### Ida F. RODRIGUEZ, Bobbie Jean Walden Rodriguez, Beverly A. Fields, Helen M. Seymour and John Eugene Rodriguez v. Beatrice Rodriguez LEPRE and James A. Lepre.

No. 58476.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 24, 1989.

Rehearing Denied June 28, 1989.

Daryl A. Dryden, Pascagoula, for appellant.

David S. Raines, Page, Mannino & Pere-sich, Biloxi, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Harrison County; John S. Morris, Chancellor.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and BLASS, JJ.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON and PITTMAN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,440,050
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,215,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,910,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,215,713
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,277,122
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,103,265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                172,236
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            172,236
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,236
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.09<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.09<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REGISTRANT HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>EPS IS NET INCOME PER $1,000 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP UNIT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0528 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL ANTHONY PARKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 30 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2023

08/23/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0528