alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony BARRETT.

No. 87-K-0913.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Barrett, Anthony; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18419-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 131423.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 184.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Jiangping Jiang, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Travel Group.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: November 9, 2007               /s/ Jiangping Jiang
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Jiangping Jiang
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


                  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
United States Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 15, 2004                      /s/ Bruce D. Benson
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Bruce D. Benson
                                          Title: Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                                 Executive Officer and President
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)


                  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a
separate disclosure document.
50299.

#### WELLS v. THE STATE.

Stolz, Judge.

At the November 1973 Term of the Superior Court of Ware County, indictment no. 4999 was returned by the grand jury charging the defendant with the offense of armed robbery. This indictment was "nolle prossed” and dismissed on motion of the defendant’s counsel in order for the defendant to have a commitment hearing. Indictment no. 4999 did not list the names of Elizabeth Grant or Christine Ford as state’s witnesses. At the April Term 1974 the defendant was again indicted for armed robbery. This indictment, no. 5046, listed the names Elizabeth Grant and Christine Ford thereon as state’s witnesses. Between the dismissal (nolle prosequi) of the first indictment (4999) and the issuance of the second indictment (5046), a commitment hearing was held and the names on indictment no. 5046 were brought out and the defendant’s counsel had knowledge of these witnesses. Prior to arraignment, at a meeting with the assistant district attorney, the defendant’s counsel waived formal arraignment, but did not waive a copy of the bill of indictment or a list of witnesses. (These two items were lined out on the indictment form.) Although the record is somewhat unclear, it appears that the defendant’s counsel received a copy of indictment no. 4999, the first *329indictment, which did not contain the names of the witnesses previously referred to. The record is silent as to any additional effort by the defendant’s counsel to obtain the list of witnesses on indictment no. 5046 or by the state to furnish counsel with same. At the trial of the case, the defendant’s counsel objected to any testimony by the two witnesses. The trial judge overruled the defendant’s counsel’s objection, and the case proceeded to trial, resulting in the defendant’s being found guilty of robbery by intimidation and sentenced to twenty years in the penitentiary by the jury. *Held:*

Submitted February 25, 1975

Decided March 19, 1975.

*Alexis & Douglas, Orin L. Alexis,*for appellant.

*Dewey Hayes, District Attorney,*for appellee.

The evidence shows that the district attorney, after conferring with the clerk, announced to the court that "they [the clerk] did not give him [defendant’s counsel] a copy of the bill of indictment, and so in some way it’s been confused.” As previously noted, the defendant’s counsel did not waive a copy of the list of witnesses to be used or a copy of the bill of indictment. See Code Ann. §§ 2-105, 27-1403 (as amended, Ga. L. 1966, pp. 430, 431). We must, therefore, reverse the conviction and remand the case to the trial court for a new trial.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 26 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 26

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 15, 1999

 Mr. Ashcroft submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal, which promotes social and 
        economic benefits beyond the benefits that accrue to the occupant of the 
        home;
Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting economic security and 
        stability for American families;
Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is, and should 
        continue to be, to encourage homeownership;
Whereas the rate of homeownership grew from 64.7 percent of households in 1995 
        to 67 percent in 1998;
Whereas the housing needs of the population will change as the population ages;
Whereas the greatest growth sectors in homeownership are minorities and first-
        time homebuyers;
Whereas the level of homeownership among foreign-born naturalized citizens who 
        have been in the United States for at least 6 years is the same as the 
        level of homeownership of the Nation as a whole (67 percent in 1998);
Whereas the value of a home represents a valuable source of savings for a 
        family;
Whereas the provisions related to homeownership are among the simplest and most 
        easily administered provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation's 
        housing policy for most of this century and may well be the most 
        important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by second homes is of crucial importance to the economies of 
        communities in each of the 50 States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that the Federal income tax deduction 
for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not 
be further restricted.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# AGENCY:

United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing the price of the 2012 American Eagle Silver Proof Coin. The coins will be offered for sale at a price of $59.95.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B.B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call 202-354-7500.

Authority:31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112 & 9701. 

      ( print page 15458)    
Dated: March 12, 2012.

Richard A. Peterson, 

Deputy Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2012-6294 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2142

         To extend the duty suspension on 2-Methylhydroquinone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the duty suspension on 2-Methylhydroquinone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-METHYLHYDROQUINONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Methylhydroquinone) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  TC  X  Calibur,   Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31,  2004,  as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"),  We, Claus  Voellmecke,  President  and  director  and Michael  Smith,
Secretary,Treasurer  and  director of the  Registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


By/S/ Claus Voellmecke
-----------------
Claus Voellmecke
President and Director
Dated this 30th day of March, 2005


By/S/ Michael Smith
-----------------
Michael Smith
Secretary, Treasurer and Director
Dated this 30th day of March, 2005
LEROY REED

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2265

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed October 13, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Mark Hulsey, III , Judge

.

Leroy Reed, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney

General, Ta llahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 73
          - [Docket No. FDA-2012-C-0224]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of petition.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that E. & J. Gallo Winery has filed a petition proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for the expanded safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments as color additives in certain distilled spirits.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Raphael A. Davy, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, 240-402-1272.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (section 721(d)(1) (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1))), notice is given that a color additive petition (CAP 2C0294) has been filed by E. & J. Gallo Winery, c/o Keller and Heckman LLP, One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2110, San Francisco, CA 94111. The petition proposes to amend the color additive regulations in 21 CFR 73.350 to provide for the safe use of mica-based pearlescent pigments prepared from titanium dioxide and mica as color additives in distilled spirits containing not less than 18% and not more than 23% alcohol by volume but not including distilled spirits mixtures containing more that 5% wine on a proof gallon basis.

The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(k) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

Dated: March 13, 2012.

Francis Lin,

Acting Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 2012-6854 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
#### Ted David MEADOWS, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff).

No. 85-3.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

Nov. 25, 1985.

*1251Leonard D. Munker, State Public Defender, Martin J. McClain, Appellate Counsel, and Denise Nau, (orally), Asst. Appellate Counsel, for appellant.

A.G. McClintock, Atty. Gen., Gerald A. Stack, Deputy Atty. Gen., John W. Ren-neisen, Senior Asst. Atty. Gen., and David K. Gruver, (orally), Legal Intern, for appel-lee.

Before THOMAS, C.J., and ROSE, ROONEY, BROWN, and CARDINE, JJ.

CARDINE, Justice.

Ted Meadows appeals his aggravated vehicular homicide conviction on due process grounds.

We affirm.

On January 29, 1984, the appellant and a friend, Terry Causby, embarked upon a journey for the purpose of purchasing beer. The appellant drove although he had already been drinking and had a blood alcohol level of at least .15%. They never reached their destination. While traveling at over 60 miles per hour in a 50-mile-per-hour zone, the appellant crossed over the center line and collided head-on with another vehicle. Causby, the passenger in the vehicle appellant was driving, was killed and four people in the second car involved in the collision were injured. Appellant was charged with aggravated vehicular homicide in violation of § 6-2-106(b), W.S. 1977 (June 1983 Replacement), and he eventually pled guilty. He properly preserved his right to argue the constitutionality of the statute on appeal. See *Tompkins v. State,*Wyo., 705 P.2d 836, 839, and *Armijo v. State,*Wyo., 678 P.2d 864 (1984).

The appellant argues that the aggravated vehicular homicide statute under which he was convicted, § 6-2-106(b), W.S.1977 (June 1983 Replacement), cannot be applied to cases in which a passenger, rather than another driver, is the victim. He claims the statute is unconstitutional, violates due process, and that this conviction must be set aside.

In our recent decision in *Caton v. State,*Wyo., 709 P.2d 1260 (1985), we held that the aggravated vehicular homicide statute applied without regard to the situation of the victim, who could be a passenger, pedestrian, bystander, or other nondriver. We also held that the statute was constitutional. The Catón decision disposes of the appellant’s claim.

Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KATHLYN M. STEIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DUANE B. GILL, DIRECTOR, VA CENTRAL 

WESTERN MA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, IN HIS 

OFFICIAL CAPACITY, 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2023-1265

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Massachusetts in No. 3:18-cv-30201-MGM,

Judge Mark G. Mastroianni.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

THIS CAUSE having been considered, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED

FOR THE COURT

June 9, 2023

Date

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow 

Acting Clerk of Court

Case: 23-1265 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 06/09/2023
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 112

To designate June 5, 1999, as ‘‘Safe Night USA’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. FEINGOLD submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

To designate June 5, 1999, as ‘‘Safe Night USA’’.

Whereas over 1,500,000 people, 220,000 of them juveniles,

were arrested last year for drug abuse;

Whereas over 1,000,000 juveniles were victims of violent

crimes last year;

Whereas local community prevention efforts are vital to reducing these alarming trends;

Whereas Safe Night began with 4,000 juvenile participants in

Milwaukee during 1994 in response to a 300 percent increase in violent death and injury in that city between

1983 and 1993;

Whereas Safe Night involved over 10,000 Wisconsin participants and included over 100 individual Safe Nights

throughout Wisconsin in 1996;
2

•SRES 112 ATS

Whereas Safe Night has been credited as a factor in reducing

the teenage homicide rate in Milwaukee by 60 percent in

just the first 3 years of the program;

Whereas Wisconsin Public Television, the Public Broadcasting Service, Black Entertainment Television, the National Latino Children’s Institute, the National Civics

League, 100 Black Men of America, the Resolving Conflict Creatively Center and Educators for Social Responsibility, the Boys and Girls Club of America, the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America, the National 4–H

Youth Council, Public Television Outreach, and the

American Academy of Pediatrics have joined with Safe

Night USA to lead this major violence prevention initiative;

Whereas community leaders, including parents, teachers, doctors, religious officials, and business leaders, will enter

into partnership with youth to foster a drug-free and violence-free environment on June 5, 1999;

Whereas this partnership combines stress and anger management programs with dances, talent shows, sporting

events, and other recreational activities, operating on only

3 basic rules: no weapons, no alcohol, and no arguments;

Whereas Safe Night USA helps youth avoid the most common factors that precede acts of violence, provides children with the tools to resolve conflict and manage anger

without violence, encourages communities to work together to identify key issues affecting teenagers, and creates local partnerships with youth that will continue beyond the expiration of the project; and

Whereas June 5, 1999, will witness over 10,000 local Safe

Night activities joined together in one nationwide effort
3

•SRES 112 ATS

to combat youth violence and substance abuse: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

3 The Senate—

4 (1) designates June 5, 1999 as ‘‘Safe Night

5 USA’’; and

6 (2) requests that the President issue a procla7 mation calling on the people of the United States to

8 observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and ac9 tivities.

10 SEC. 2. TRANSMITTAL OF RESOLUTION.

11 The Senate directs the Secretary of the Senate to

12 transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to Safe Night

13 USA.

Æ