alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                7329
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         2996
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     14178
<PP&E>                                               12832
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (3693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       36288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 9705
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 2
<OTHER-SE>                                           20507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         36288
<SALES>                                              47988
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     47988
<CGS>                                                28032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        19063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (602)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    (778)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        332
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (750)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   1082
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                          1082
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .05



</TABLE>
#### T. Ray PHILLIPS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. UTAH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TRUST, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 18279.

Supreme Court of Utah.

March 11, 1983.

Michael T. McCoy, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Stephen A. Laker, Ogden, for plaintiff and respondent.

OAKS, Justice:

Defendant is the underwriter for hospital and medical benefits for employees of Utah cities and towns. After his retirement from Ogden City, plaintiff elected to continue his coverage, as permitted by the city and its underwriter. Thereafter, while engaged in casual hourly employment fixing a roof for a private individual, he was injured in a fall. Defendant rejected his claim for hospital and medical expenses because of the following provision in the Master Policy, which both parties apparently concede to be applicable to employees and retired employees alike:

> 7.1. The benefits described in this certificate do not cover:

> 7.1.1. Accidental injury arising out of or in the course of any occupation or employment for remuneration or profit or sickness for which the insured employee or insured dependent is entitled to benefits under any workmen’s compensation law, employer’s liability law, or similar law or for an injury suffered as the result of an accident arising out of or in the course of employment (i.e., this policy is not a substitute for workmen’s compensation).

On cross-motions for summary judgment in this action against the underwriter, the district court gave plaintiff judgment for his $6,738.62, plus interests and costs, and defendant appealed.

*250Defendant argues that the exclusion prevents recovery since plaintiff was injured in “an accident arising out of or in the course of employment.” In its memorandum opinion, the district court rejected that argument for the following reason:

> The accident policy exclusion is to avoid coverage when Workmen’s Compensation is or should be present, so that it cannot be used as a “substitute” for Workmen’s Compensation or provide double coverage.

We agree.

The purpose of the exclusion, identified by the district court, is especially evident from the fact that the language in this Master Policy is, by its terms, applicable to current employees only. The policy is apparently available to retired employees only as a concession by practice. If the quoted language of exclusion is to be applied to the special casual “employment” circumstance of a retired employee, it must be by terms more explicit than these. The well-settled principle that insurance contracts are construed strictly against the insurer and in favor of the insured is therefore dispositive on the facts of this case. *Christensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange,*21 Utah 2d 194, 196-97, 443 P.2d 385, 386 (1968); *P.E. Ashton Co. v. Joyner,*17 Utah 2d 162, 164-65, 406 P.2d 306, 308 (1965); 43 Am.Jur.2d *Insurance*§ 283 (1982).

The summary judgment for plaintiff is affirmed. Costs to respondent.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART and DURHAM, JJ., concur.

HOWE, J., concurs in the result.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Xenonics Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2008
    /s/ Richard S. KayName:
    Richard S. KayTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
#### Ex parte L.F. (Re L.F. v. STATE of Alabama ex rel. S.W.)

1920115.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Sept. 3, 1993.

*645Jarett C. Crawford, Mobile, for petitioner.

William Prendergast and Lois Brasfield, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is quashed as improvidently granted.

In quashing the writ, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. *Horsley v. Horsley,*291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, ALMON, SHORES, HOUSTON, STEAGALL, KENNEDY and INGRAM, JJ., concur.
#### Anna Levine, Plaintiff, *v.*Barney Levine, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 25, 1957.

*David M. Markowitz*for plaintiff.

*Martin Levy*for defendant.

Frederick Backer, J.

This is a cross motion by plaintiff for leave to enter judgment for arrears of alimony. Objection is made by the defendant that the cross motion is defective by reason that it was not instituted by order to show cause (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1171-b). The defendant moved against plaintiff to modify the judgment. He instituted this motion by his attorney. Plaintiff’s cross motion, therefore, served on said attorney, is properly interposed pursuant to section 117 of the Civil Practice Act. It permits a cross motion to be made by the service, at least three days prior to the return of the main motion, of a *notice*specifying any kind of relief, whether same is responsive or not to the relief requested by the moving party.

The motion to enter judgment is granted. Settle order.
1 **Cyhalofop -**  **butyl Focus Meeting** 

**July 11, 2014 1**  **0 :00**  **- 11**  **:00 a**  **m, Potomac Yards South -**  **9 100**  Attendees From EPA BEAD: Rafael Prieto, Derek Berwald, Bill Phillips, Monisha Kaul EFED: Kristina Garber , Richard Shamblen, Jean Holmes, and Brian Anderson HED: Jaime D’Agostino, Doug Dotson, Margarita Collantes, Christiana Swartz PRD: Jolene Trujillo, Jill Bloom , Linda Arrington From DowAgroSciences Nneka Breaux , US Regulatory Manager Rafael Herrera, Global Regulatory Manager Rick Mann, Biology Technical Expert **AGENDA** Introductions Review the following items: 1) Can Dow clarify the term “post

- flood?”

For example, in water

- seeded rice, is the “post

- flood” application the period after the flood for seeding, or application period after permanent flood? 2) Clincher DR is referenced as a supplemental application product to Clincher GR (southern states). Is Clincher DR a registered product? 3) Ratoon rice. How is clincher used in the ratoon rice production process? 4) How are buffer zones established?

Buffer distances fo r the same commodity vary among labels. In particular, for endangered species, the RebelEX has a smaller distance for the Southern States than California 5) Why can the granule formulations be only applied to “water

- seeded” rice?

It seems that the granule co uld be applied to “dry

- seeded” rice since the granule is applied to flooded waters. Discuss locations of use across the country

- These are of particular importance to focus our endangered species assessment. Discuss the spectrum of plants that are affected by the mechanism of action for this chemical. Discuss DowAgroSciences plan for wild rice Can DowAgroSciences provide a bibliography of studies for any data developed for Europe or elsewhere? Final Thoughts
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as Receiver for Millennium State Bank of Texas, Dallas, Texas (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Millennium State Bank of Texas, Dallas, Texas, on July 2, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Dated this 16th day of March, 2012.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-6855 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIALREPORT**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 to which this certificationis being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), and the Exchange Act.  Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date:**August 13, 2009 | ** **                                               |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | /s/ Dale B.  Herbst                                      |
|                          | Name: Dale B.  Herbst                                    |
|                          | Title: Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**REAL MEX RESTAURANTS, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Real Mex Restaurants, Inc (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven Tanner,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

August 8, 2005 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ STEVEN  TANNER         |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                       |
|   |   | Steven Tanner              |
|   |   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Order filed, August 8, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00673-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.G.S. AND T.W.S., CHILDREN, Appellant

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-01569

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due July 23, 2012, 2012. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On August 2, 2012, this court granted the court reporters request for extension of 

time to file the record until August 13, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed with 

the court. Because the reporter’s record will not be filed within the time prescribed in the 

first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issues the following order.

We order Ramona Gonzalez, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal on or before August 23, 2012. No further extension will be entertained absent 

exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for 

ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If 
Ramona Gonzalez does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an 

order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure 

to file the record.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


               [Letterhead of SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.]





                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                    -----------------------------------------




The Board of Directors
New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-31737 and No. 333-66305) on Form S-8 of New Hampshire Thrift
Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated January 10, 2003, with
respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of New Hampshire
Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity,
cash flows and comprehensive income, for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002 which report appears in the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares,
Inc.




                                      /s/ Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.
                                      SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.



West Peabody, Massachusetts
March 27, 2003
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2430 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain children’s footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

children’s footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.92 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain children’s footwear) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2430 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE ex rel. Mark JEFF v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-2147.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 30, 1987.

In re Mark, Jeff; applying for remedial writ; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the district court for its immediate consideration.
106TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 154 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Whereas in 1982, after a period of 28 years, the Congress 

of the United States resumed the United States commemorative coin programs; 

Whereas since 1982, 37 of the Nation’s worthy institutions, 

organizations, foundations, and programs have been commemorated under the coin programs; 

Whereas since 1982, the Nation’s coin collectors have purchased nearly 49,000,000 commemorative coins that have 

yielded nearly $1,800,000,000 in revenue and more than 

$407,000,000 in surcharges benefitting a variety of deserving causes; 

Whereas the United States Capitol has benefitted from the 

commemorative coin surcharges that have supported such 

commendable projects as the restoration of the Statue of 

Freedom atop the Capitol dome, the furtherance of the 

development of the United States Capitol Visitor Center, 

and the planned National Garden at the United States 

Botanic Gardens on the Capitol grounds; 

Whereas surcharges from the year 2000 coin program commemorating the Library of Congress bicentennial benefit 

the Library of Congress bicentennial programs, educational outreach activities (including schools and libraries), and other activities of the Library of Congress; and 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

SCON 154 ES 

Whereas the United States Capitol Visitor Center commemorative coin program will commence in January 2001, with 

the surcharges designated to further benefit the Capitol 

Visitor Center: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives 

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the Congress of the United States acknowledges and 

4 salutes the ongoing generosity, loyalty, and significant role 

5 that coin collectors have played in supporting our Nation’s 

6 meritorious charitable organizations, foundations, institu7 tions, and programs, including the United States Capitol, 

8 the Library of Congress, and the United States Botanic 

9 Gardens. 

Passed the Senate October 23 (legislative day, September 22), 2000. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
106TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 154 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

To acknowledge and salute the contributions of coin 

collectors. 


erjones on PROD1PC71 with BILLS