alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alphonso PETERSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BR-341.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 3, 1987.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Pamela D. Presnell, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Kurt L. Barch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

NIMMONS, Judge.

In sentencing appellant as an adult, the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Section 39.111(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1986 Supp.), which mandates that, when sentencing a juvenile as an adult, the trial court must explain in writing why adult sanctions are suitable, treating the criteria set forth in Section 39.111(7)(c). The sentence must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing. *State v. Rhoden,*448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); *Addison v. State,*503 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); *Banks v. State,*488 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

OF MARYLAND

Misc. Docket AG No s
. 6 & 13 September Term, 201 6

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v.
DENISE LEONA BELLAMY

Barbera, C.J. G reene Adkins McDonald Watts Hotten Getty ,

JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: April 3, 2017 Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CAE 16

- 18400 Argued: April 3 , 201 7ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND
* Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland

* Misc. Docket AG No s . 6 & 13

DENISE LEONA BELLAMY * September Term, 2016

PER CURIAM ORDER
For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it
is this 3rd day of April 2017,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the
Respondent, Denise Leona Bellamy be, and s he is hereby, disbarred,
effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State
of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of
Denise Leona Bellamy from the register of attorneys, and pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19- 761 , shall certify that fact to the Trustees
of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals
in the State; and it is further
ORDERED that Respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the
Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant
to Maryland Rule 19- 7 09 , for which sum judgment is entered in favor
of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Denise LeonaBellamy

.

/s/ Mary Ellen Barbera Chief Judge
1 Attachment 

Hi RogerI’ve attached an electronic copy of the BA. I will also send a hard copy to you via Fed-X today.

Thanks,

Lincoln Hulse

Natural Resources Division Manager 

URS Corporation

2020 East 1st Street, Suite 400

Santa Ana, CA 92705

Phone 714-648-2824

Fax 714-433-7701

Mobile 714-227-1992

From: Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kohn.Roger@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:15 AM 

To: Hulse, Lincoln 

Subject: Pio Pico BA

 

Lincoln, 

We received the Biological Assessment for the Pio Pico Energy Center on Dec 1. Wondering if you could send 

me another hard copy and an electronic copy? That would make it easier for us to include a copy when we 

consult with US FWS, and post an electronic copy in our docket. 

RE: Pio Pico BA 

Hulse, Lincoln 

to: 

Roger Kohn 

12/05/2011 02:12 PM 

Cc: 

"Fitzgerald, Maggie" 

Hide Details 

From: "Hulse, Lincoln" <lincoln.hulse@urs.com>

To: Roger Kohn/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Cc: "Fitzgerald, Maggie" <maggie.fitzgerald@urs.com>

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded.

Pio Pico Draft Biological Assessment 29Nov2011_Final.pdf

This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be 

proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or are not the intended recipient, you should 

not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mail and any 

attachments or copies.

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkohn\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web0515.htm 2/8/2012
Thank you. 

Roger Kohn 

USEPA Region 9 - Air Division (AIR-3) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

415-972-3973 

kohn.roger@epa

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\rkohn\Local Settings\Temp\notesDF63F8\~web0515.htm 2/8/2012
S. J. Res. 42

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Iba ́n

 ̃

ez as a citizen regent of the

Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Manuel L.

Iba ́n

 ̃

ez of Texas on May 4, 2000, is filled by the reappointment

of the incumbent for a term of 6 years. The reappointment shall

take effect on May 5, 2000.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.1



|     |  |                                                                         
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Four Oaks Place 1360 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 2500 Houston, Texas 77056
|     | 
|     | 

|                 |  |  |  |            |  |                       
|---------------- |  |  |  | ---------- |  | ----------------------
|                 |  |  | 
|Principals       |  |  |  | Telephone: |  | (713) 850-9955        
|William B. Cline |  |  |  | Facsimile: |  | (713) 850-9966        
|Peter D. Gaffney |  |  |  | Email:     |  | gcah@gaffney-cline.com

DKM/vaw/C1490.00/gcah.194.08

May 29, 2008

Repsol YPF, S.A.

Paseo de la Castellana 278-280

28046 Madrid

Spain

Repsol YPF S.A. Annual Report Form 20-F:

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As independent reserve engineers for
Repsol YPF S.A., Gaffney, Cline & Associates, Inc. (GCA) hereby confirms that it has granted and not withdrawn its consent to the reference to GCAs review of Repsol YPFs reserves as of September 30, 2007 in the form and
context disclosed by Respsol YPF in Section 2.2.1.1. Oil and Gas Reserves in Repsol YPFs annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007; and in the Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas
Exploration and Production Activities (unaudited information) in the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein.

GCA audited
certain areas in which Repsol YPF has an interest in Argentina, Venezuela and in the Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.

* * * * *

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.



Very truly yours,GAFFNEY, CLINE & ASSOCIATES, INC.




/s/ David K. MorganDavid K. MorganSenior Manager




|               |  |               |  |           |  |           |  |           |  |       
|-------------- |  | ------------- |  | --------- |  | --------- |  | --------- |  | ------
|UNITED KINGDOM |  | UNITED STATES |  | SINGAPORE |  | AUSTRALIA |  | ARGENTINA |  | MOSCOW
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           22,957
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    75,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                      6,908
<INVENTORY>                                      64,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                171,353
<PP&E>                                          173,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (108,777)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  248,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           145,155
<BONDS>                                          81,696
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          7,186
<OTHER-SE>                                      (41,644)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    248,959
<SALES>                                         397,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                397,386
<CGS>                                           295,180
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   295,180
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 80,944
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6,755
<INCOME-TAX>                                        724
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .69 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .69
        


</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GILB ER T L. GAR

R IDO, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. R AYTHEON C OM PANY, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-55745 D.C . No. 2:12-c v-03825-GAF-R Z M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Gary A. Fe e ss, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

April 7, 2015 * * B e fore : FISHER , TALLM AN, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Gilbe rt L. Ga

rrido a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his dive

rsity a c t i on a l le ging e m

ploy m e nt disc rim ination a

nd re t a lia tion c la im s unde r C a lifornia ’ s Fa ir Em ploy m e nt Housing Ac t (“ FEHA” ). He a lle ge d that he wa s ille ga lly

unde rpa id a

nd te rm inate d . W e h a

v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u

n d e r 2 8 

# F IL ED APR 16 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U . S . C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e re vie w de novo, J one s v . Blanas , 393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th C ir. 2004), a nd we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Ga

rrido’ s ra c ia l disc rim ination c la im

be c a use Ga rrido fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine dispute of m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r he pe rform e d his job sa tisfa c torily

or whe the r sim ila

rly situa te d individuals outside his prote c te d c l a ss we re tre ate d m ore favora b ly . Se e Guz v . Be c hte l N at’l, Inc . , 8 P.3d 1089, 1113-14 (2000) (se tting forth e le m e nts of prim a fa c i e c a se of disc rim i nation). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on Ga

rrido’ s re ta lia tion c la im be c a use Ga rrido fa i le d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r the re wa s a

c a usa l link be t

we e n a ny prote c te d a c tivity and the a dve rse e m

ploy m e nt a c tion. Se e Vasque

z v . C ounty of Los Ange le

s , 349 F.3d 634, 646 (9th C i r. 2004) (e l e m e nts of a prim a fa c ie c a se of re ta lia tion unde r Title VII); Raad v . Fairbank

s N . Star Borough Sc

h. Dist. , 323 F.3d 1185, 1197 (9th C ir. 2003) (e m ploy e r’ s knowle dge of prote c te d a c tivity ne c e s sa ry for c a usation); se e also Me toy e r v . C

hassman , 504 F.3d 919, 941 (9th C ir. 2007) (“ C a l ifornia c ourts a pply the T itle VII fra m e w ork to c l a im s brought under FEHA.” ).

1 3 - 5 5 7 4 5 2W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se e Padge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 5 5 7 4 5 3
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Eagle Hospitality Properties Trust, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Raymond
D. Martz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|                                                
|/s/ Raymond D. Martz                            
|Raymond D. Martz                                
|Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
|August 11, 2005
#### Randy CURTIS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58416.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1989.

David L. Walker, Batesville, for appellant.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Quitman County; Elzy J. Smith, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00062-CV

In the Interest of K.N., a Child §

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-94280 J-11)

June 27, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 21
- 00359
- CV

__________________
IN THE INTEREST OF K.R.K.
- L. H.

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 253rd District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV2016063

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 9, 2021, a ppellant L.H. filed a notice of appeal from a proposed order of termination signed by an associate judge on October 20, 2021. Appellant also filed a request for a de novo hearing by the referring court. On December 8, 2021, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the referring court has not signed a final order . In response, L.H. concedes the termination order is interlocutory because the referring cou rt has not held the de novo hearing.2 When a party timely files a request for a de novo hearing and nothing in the record indicates that the appellant waived the right to a d e novo hearing, the associate judge’s ruling is not a final judgment. See C. A. v. Tex

. Dep ’ t of Fam ily & Protective
Servs. , No. 03

- 20

- 00158

- CV, 2020 WL 4929786, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 18, 2020, no pet.) (mem. op.) . We grant the Department’s motion to dismiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42. 3 (a), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 29, 2021 Opinion Delivered December 30, 2021 Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINING SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 31, 1998 (AUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1998
(AUDITED) IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,505
<SECURITIES>                                    12,433
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                       706
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,304
<PP&E>                                          17,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,392
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,449
<SALES>                                         28,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,858
<CGS>                                            2,426
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,917
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,510)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,510)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.47)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.47)
<FN>
<F1>For Purpose of This Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
ACCEPTED

12-15-00260-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

12/8/2015 5:09:58 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 12/8/2015 5:09:58 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

                     Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

I, Harmon H. Hardy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Stelax Industries, Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure control and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d--15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

     a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

     b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based upon such
            evaluation; and

     c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or
            is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.




Date:    June 21, 2006                     By: /s/ Harmon H. Hardy
         -------------                     --------------------------------
                                           Harmon H. Hardy
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chief Financial Officer



<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of American Cordillera Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended May 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Frank H. Blair, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: July 20, 2015

|  

By:

/s/ Frank H. Blair

 

 

Frank H. Blair

 

 

President, CEO, Director |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|