alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              80
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                        65
<INVENTORY>                                      1,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,524
<PP&E>                                           2,863
<DEPRECIATION>                                     764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,619
<BONDS>                                            777
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               51
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,727
<SALES>                                          3,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,076
<CGS>                                            1,712
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (467)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (655)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (655)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.13)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          27,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,332
<PP&E>                                         119,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                 103,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          547,107
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,019
<OTHER-SE>                                   (465,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,826
<SALES>                                        757,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               757,257
<CGS>                                          592,897
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,744
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,785
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (435,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (435,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (435,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
#### Karen B. FAYARD v. CONTIFLEETING, INC., et al.

No. 87-C—2144.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Fayard, Karen B.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-7077; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “K”, No. 84-16747.

Prior report: La.App., 511 So.2d 3.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
#### Herman KRESS and Mae Kress, Appellants, v. GITTLIN COMPANIES, INC., f/k/a Gittlin Bag Company, Appellee.

No. 87-0833.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 2, 1988.

*333Michael Paul Shienvold of Michael Paul Shienvold, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Steven D. Kaufman of Bercuson, Cahan & Tarr, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of dismissal upon authority of *Tinsley v. McDonald,*378 So.2d 816 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, WALDEN, JJ„ and SHARP, WINIFRED, J., Associate Judge, concur.
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Mike Borsetti, 

Third-party Complainant 

V. 

American Airlines, Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket DOT-OST-2015-0087 

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE 

FOR THE FILING OF AMERICAN'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

Comments with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

Alec Bramlett, Esq. 

Senior Litigation Attorney 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

P.O. Box 619616 MD 5675 

DFW Airport, Texas 75161 

Dated: April24, 2015 

Robert P. Silverberg, Esq. 

SILVERBERG GOLDMAN, LLP 

1101 30th Street, NW 

Suite 300 

Washington, DC 20007 

Tel: 202-944-3300 

E-Mail: rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

Attorneys for 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 
BEFORE THE 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Mike Borsetti, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Third-party Complainant 

Docket DOT-OST-2015-0087 

V. 

American Airlines, Inc. 

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE 

FOR THE FILING OF AMERICAN'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 

The Complainant, Mike Borsetti, and the Respondent, American Airlines, Inc. 

("American") hereby file this agreed motion to extend the date by which American will answer 

the docketed complaint to May 19, 2015. American requires a limited amount of additional time 

to research the issues raised in the complaint and to prepare and file its written answer thereto. 

WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, and taking into account Mr. Borsetti joins 

in the filing of this motion, American hereby requests it be permitted to file its answer to the 

complaint on or before May 19, 2015 . 

Respectfully submitted, 

SILVERBERG GOLDMAN, L.L.P. 

Attorneys for 

AMK N AIRLINES, INC. 

By t, £,.-1 !?'\_~ Robe1i P. Silverberg 

MIKE BORSETTI 

By: A1. ~ ltJr.w/f{?iJ- Mike Borsetti 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have on this 24th day of April2015 , served a copy of the foregoing 

Agreed Motion by e-mail upon the following persons: 

Blane Workie 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

blane. workie(a),dot. gov 

Kimberly Graber 

Branch Chief 

Consumer Protection and Competition Law 

Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

kimber y.gra er(c~dot.gov
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-3388

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Mark Steven Woods, Jr., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 24, 2009

Filed: November 30, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Mark Woods (Woods) pled guilty to possessing more than 500 grams of

cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(ii). 

The district court1

 imposed a sentence of 188 months in prison, a $2,500 fine, and 4

years of supervised release. On appeal, Woods’s counsel seeks to withdraw and has

filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that Woods

should not have been sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because

1

The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Arkansas.
one of his two predicate offenses occurred when he was age 17, although he was

charged and convicted in federal court as an adult. 

We agree with the district court’s career-offender determination. See U.S.S.G.

§ 4B1.1(a) (stating requirements for career-offender status), id. § 4B1.2 cmt. (n.1)

(“[A] federal conviction for an offense committed prior to the defendant’s eighteenth

birthday is an adult conviction if the defendant was expressly proceeded against as an

adult”); United States v. Ojeda-Estrada, 577 F.3d 871, 875 (8th Cir. 2009) (declaring

de novo review of a career-offender determination); United States v. McNeil, 90 F.3d

298, 299-300 (8th Cir. 1996) (holding a previous offense committed when the

defendant was 17 years old was properly considered a predicate offense for

determining career-offender status because the defendant was charged and convicted

as an adult (citing United States v. Hazelett, 32 F.3d 1313, 1320 (8th Cir. 1994))). 

Further, we find no abuse of discretion in the sentence, see United States v. Feemster,

572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (listing factors that constitute abuse

of discretion), and no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal, see Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75, 80 (1988). 

We grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
#### BOARD OF EXAMINERS OF CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTERS, Through Denis P. JUGE v. Nick NEYREY, Jr.

No. 87-C-2140.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Board of Examiners etc.; Certified Shorthand Reporters; Juge, Denis P.; ap*461plying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6761; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “H”, No. 85-13520.

Prior report: La.App., 511 So.2d 463.

Denied.

CALOGERO and MARCUS, JJ., would grant the writ.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 91

Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of the

reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former Soviet Union.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2, 2000

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GORTON, Mr. LOTT, Mr. HELMS, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. GRASSLEY,

Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr. ROBB, and Mr. FITZGERALD) submitted the

following resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Lithuania on the tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from

the rule of the former Soviet Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on March 11, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Lithuania led to the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;

Whereas Lithuania since then has successfully built democracy, ensured human and minority rights, the rule of law,

developed a free market economy, implemented exemplary
2

•SCON 91 ATS

relations with neighboring countries, and consistently

pursued a course of integration into the community of

free and democratic nations by seeking membership in

the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and

Whereas Lithuania, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress hereby——

3 (1) congratulates Lithuania on the occasion of

4 the tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its

5 independence and the leading role it played in the

6 disintegration of the former Soviet Union; and

7 (2) commends Lithuania for its success in im8 plementing political and economic reforms, which

9 may further speed the process of that country’s inte10 gration into European and Western institutions.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Don Peay certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of World Trophy Outfitters, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

|   | /s/ Don Peay |
|--------|--------------|

Don Peay, President and Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

February 14, 2008
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2105 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain lithium-ion battery cells. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain lithium-ion battery 

cells. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LITHIUM-ION BATTERY CELLS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2105 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Lithium-ion battery cells 

(provided for in subheading 

8507.80.40), certified by the 

importer for use as the primary source of electrical 

power for electrically powered 

vehicles of subheading 

8703.90 in which an on 

board gasoline engine is used 

to run a generator that recharges the electric drive 

motor battery ........................ 3.21% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Provision Holdings, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curt Thornton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





January 11, 2012





/s/ Curt Thornton


Curt Thornton


Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### Theodore WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-36.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Aug. 5, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 3, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court arguing that the departure from the presumptive guidelines range is unsupported by any clear and convincing reasons. Based on the following cases, we agree. *Scott v. State,*508 So.2d 335 (Fla.1987); *State v. Tyner,*506 So.2d 405 (Fla.1987); *Keys v. State,*500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986); *Whitehead v. State,*498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986); *State v. Mischler,*488 So.2d 523 (Fla.1986); *Hendrix v. State,*475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985). We affirm appellant’s convictions and reverse and vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded with instructions.

FRANK, J. and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.
#### In the Matter of John J. Robinson et al., Petitioners, against Joseph A. McNamara et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 2, 1949.

*11*Schaffer <& Brown (Leo Brown*and *Robert H. Schaffer*of counsel), for petitioners.

*John P. McGrath, Corporation Counsel (Frank H. Crabtree*of counsel), for respondents.

John E. McGeehan, J.

This motion is denied, and the petition is dismissed upon the ground that the application is not timely under the ruling of Mr. Justice Dineen in *Matter of Lennox*v. *McNamara*(16 Misc 2d 9) and upon the further ground that the actions of the commission were not unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious, and that while the *“*best answers ” may be somewhat controversial, nevertheless the court finds that the questions were not so indefinite and ambiguous as not to be capable of a “ best ’ ’ answer, within the purview of the interpretation of the Municipal Civil Service Commission. The affidavit of the president of the said commission entirely refutes the petitioners’ assertion that the best answers selected were erroneous. For an honest difference of opinion this court cannot intervene nor can the Supreme Court act in a general supervisory capacity over civil service examinations and substitute its judgment for that of administrative officials in matters that are not the result of unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious conduct on the part of said administrators.
EX-4.8





 Exhibit 4.8 

ADDENDUM 
 HARDSHIP
WITHDRAWALS TO COMPLY WITH THE 
 BIPARTISAN BUDGET ACT OF 2018 AND THE 2017 TAX CUTS AND JOBS 

ACT INTERIM COMPLIANCE AMENDMENT 
 The
provisions of this Addendum are part of the amendment to comply with the revised rules and procedures issued with the Final Treasury Regulations on September 23, 2019 regarding hardship withdrawals from qualified Plans. 

 

	A.1	 AVAILABILITY 



In addition to the current selections made at Section 25 of this Adoption Agreement, the Plan hereby permits hardship withdrawals from the
following Accounts (including income unless otherwise excluded): (select any; however, these contributions must already be available under the Plan) 
  

	 	☒	 Post- 1988 income on 401 (k) Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 Non-QACA Safe Harbor Matching Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 Non-QACA Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 QACA Safe Harbor Matching Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 QACA Safe Harbor Nonelective Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 QMACs 


  

	 	☐	 QNECs 


  

	 	☐	 Prior Safe Harbor Contributions 



 

	 	☐	 Income on all Employer Contribution sources, including those elected above, will be excluded.



  

	A.2	 DETERMINATION OF IMMEDIATE AND HEAVY FINANCIAL NEED. 



Hardship withdrawals shall be made based on the parameters specified in the HARDSHIP WITHDRAWAL INTERIM AMENDMENT which governs this Adoption
Agreement. 
  

	A.3	 DETERMINATION THAT PLAN DISTRIBUTION IS NECESSARY TO MEET NEED. 



The necessity for determining hardship withdrawal no longer requires suspension of a Participant’s “elective contributions” (and
“employee contributions” as applicable) under all plans of the Employer or a Related Company. Any coordination with this suspension for any other Plan purpose is also eliminated. 

 

	A.4	 OPTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON HARDSHIP WITHDRAWALS. 



 

	 	☐	 Before a hardship withdrawal may be made, a Participant must obtain all nontaxable loans available under this
Plan and all other plans maintained by the Employer. 


  

	A.5	 EFFECTIVE DATE 



The Western Digital Corporation 401(k) Plan has been amended to comply with the revised rules and procedures issued with the Final Treasury
Regulations on September 23, 2019 regarding hardship withdrawals. 
 Unless elected earlier by the Employees written direction or
administrative policy or procedure, this Addendum (including the selections above) is effective for hardship withdrawals made by the Plan on or after January l, 2020. 

Western Digital Corporation 

Name of Plan Sponsor 
  

	
	 /s/ Lori Sundberg

	 Authorized Signature

	 6/23/2020