alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2375 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2375

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work surfaces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Voinovich introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work surfaces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAUNDRY WORK SURFACES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Laundry work        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        surfaces, each                                                     31/2011.......
                        comprising a
                        molded polyvinyl
                        chloride plastic
                        base with
                        backguard supply
                        tray and having a
                        chemical and
                        scratch-resistant
                        synthetic rubber
                        work mat insert
                        on the top
                        surface, the
                        foregoing
                        designed for
                        placement across
                        the tops of
                        household front-
                        loading clothes
                        washer and dryer
                        pairs to make a
                        single work
                        surface (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4016.99.05)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



|             |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------------ |  | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2 |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2009
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | /s/ RANDALL T. MAYS    
|Name:                 |  | Randall T. Mays        
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will
be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### Judy M. FOSTER et vir v. LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., J.T. Ferrier et al.

No. 87-C-0691.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Valley Forge Ins. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18411-CA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 301609.

Prior report: La.App., 504 So.2d 82.

Denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2371 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 

assembled as picks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as picks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS 

4 ASSEMBLED AS PICKS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as 

picks (provided for in subheading 6702.90.35) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2371 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 11

                               Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Primary                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                                       -------------------------------------------

                                                     1995                   1994               1993  
                                                     ----                   ----               ----
<S>                                              <C>                    <C>                <C>
Average common shares outstanding*                1,582,273              1,471,561          1,471,445
                                                 ==========             ==========         ==========
Net income                                       $4,129,733             $3,369,874         $2,619,172
                                                 ==========             ==========         ==========
Per share amount                                   $2.61                  $2.29              $1.78
                                                   =====                  =====              =====
</TABLE>


     Earnings per share amounts for each year presented reflect the 10% stock
dividend, December 29, 1993 and 5% stock dividend, November 29, 1994 and
December 22, 1995.  Fully diluted net income per common share data are not
presented because there are no material differences between those amounts and
the income per share data as presented.

* Includes an immaterial amount of common stock equivalents.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7013]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLWY-957400-12-L19100000-BJ0000-LRCMK1G04596]


Filing of Plats of Survey, Nebraska

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is scheduled to file the 
plat of survey of the lands described below thirty (30) calendar days 
from the date of this publication in the BLM Wyoming State Office, 
Cheyenne, Wyoming.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 5353 
Yellowstone Road, P.O. Box 1828, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82003.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was executed at the request of 
the Bureau of Indian Affairs and is necessary for the management of 
these lands. The lands surveyed are:
    The plat and field notes representing the dependent resurvey of 
portions of the Winnebago Indian Reservation Boundary, the 
subdivisional lines and the subdivision of certain sections, and the 
survey of the subdivision of certain sections, Township 27 North, Range 
9 East, Sixth Principal Meridian, Nebraska, Group No. 173, was accepted 
March 19, 2012.
    Copies of the preceding described plats and field notes are 
available to the public at a cost of $1.10 per page.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
John P. Lee,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor, Division of Support Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-7013 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11

MERCURY FINANCE COMPANY

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE

Year Ended December 31 (dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 


                                                       1998         1997          1996
                                                       ----         ----          ----
Income Data:
------------
<S>                                                 <C>           <C>           <C>
1.   Net loss                                       $ (53,570)    $ (74,193)    $(28,968)
2.   Weighted average common share
      outstanding, adjusted for stock splits          177,901       177,892      177,129
3.   Weighted average shares of treasury stock
      outstanding, adjusted for stock splits            5,403         5,403        4,361
4.   Weighted average shares reserved for stock
      options (utilizing the treasury stock method)         0             0            0

     NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

5.   Common Shares Outstanding                        172,498       172,489      172,768
       (Line 2-3+4)
6.   Net loss per common shares                     $   (0.31)    $   (0.43)    $  (0.17)
       (Line 1/5)

     DIVIDEND DATA

1.   Dividends Declared                             $       0     $  12,937     $ 51,821
2.   Average common shares outstanding
       on dividend record date                              -       172,498      172,737
3.   Dividends per common share                     $       0     $   0.075     $   0.30

</TABLE>
Note 1.

In February, 1997, following the announcement of the discovery of accounting
irregularities which caused the overstatement of the previously released
earnings for 1995 and 1996, the market value of the Company's common stock was
significantly reduced.

Since the announcement, the value of the common stock has not exceeded the
exercise price of the stock options granted or regranted under a revised stock
option program. As a result, the calculation of the common share equivalents
becomes not meaningful for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997.

The Company applies APB Opinion 25 in accounting for its Plan, and accordingly,
no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the
consolidated financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost
based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No.
123, the Company's 1998 and 1997 net losses and loss per share would have been
increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          1998           1997
<S>                                                    <C>            <C>
Net Loss                             As reported       $(53,570)      $(74,193)
                                     Pro forma         $(53,581)      $(78,564)
Basic and Diluted Loss per Share     As reported       $  (0.31)      $  (0.43)
                                     Pro forma         $  (0.31)      $  (0.46)
</TABLE>

                                      76
Exhibit
10.33


PROMISSORY NOTE 




	
  $79,380

  	
   

  	
  May 12, 2005

  






 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned person (“Maker”),
by this promissory note (this “Note”), hereby promises to pay to the order of
MxEnergy, Inc. (“Payee”),the principal sum of seventy-nine thousand three
hundred eighty dollars ($79,380.00) on the date set forth below.  The outstanding principal balance hereof
shall be due and payable on June 25, 2005 (the “Demand Date”).  This Note shall not bear interest.


Principal shall be payable in United States Dollars,
without any deduction of any nature by way of set off, counterclaim or
otherwise, to Payee’s account as Payee may from time to time notify Maker in
writing.  Maker, in its sole discretion,
shall have the right, without penalty, to prepay the entire or any partial
amount of the Note.


In the event that any provision of this Note should be
held invalid, illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such provision shall be severable from the remaining provision of this Note and
the validity, legality and enforceability of such remaining provision shall not
in any way be affected or impaired thereby. 
This Note may not be amended, changed, modified, supplemented or restated,
except in writing by Payee and Maker, or their permitted successors and assigns.  This Note shall be governed by, construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.




	
  Maker:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  JED
  Communications Associates, Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  by:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Daniel G. Bergstein

  	
   

  
	
  Daniel
  G. Bergstein, President
Exhibit 35.1SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENTAmerican Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.American Express Credit Account Master TrustReporting Period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related ServicesCompany, Inc. (“TRS”), as Servicer pursuant to the American Express Credit Account Master Trust(the “Trust”) Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 6, 1996, as amended and restated asof January 1, 2006 (the “Agreement”), among American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II,American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC, and American Express ReceivablesFinancing Corporation IV LLC, as transferors, TRS, as servicer, and The Bank of New York, astrustee and securities intermediary (the “Trustee”), does hereby certify that:1. TRS is Servicer under the Agreement. 2. The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute anddeliver this Certificate. 3. A review of the Servicer’s activities during the reporting period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reportingperiod.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 22nd day of March,2007.AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.     By: /s/ Stephen J. Bakonyi  Name:  Stephen J. Bakonyi  Title: Vice President
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE.OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. :7 11. 

## 21 A 10: 

## S2

IN THE MATTER OF: COASTAL AIR TRANSPORT, INC. Respondent. FAA DocketNo.**FAA~2011-1005** Judge J.E. Sullivan FAA CASE NO. 2010S0700037

COMPLAINANT'S STATEMENT REGARDING VENUE The Complainant, by and through his undersigned attorney, hereby submits in accordance with the Administrative Judge's Order dated June 11, 2012, the Complainant's Statement Regarding Venue as follows:

The Complainant has completed a review ofthe facts and issues presented in this matter and has determined that the Agency is not opposed to Respondent's request for venue. PreviouslyRespondent asked for venue to be set in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. In light ofthe geographic locations of the Agency's witnesses the Complainant is agreeable to venue for the hearing ofthis matterto be set in St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Respectfully submitted this 26th day ofJuly 2012.

# ~~R{hr Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel

1CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a,copy of the foregoing Complainant's Statement Regarding Venue was mailed byFederal Express and facsimile to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan DOT, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor Room El2-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 (FAX) (202) 366-7536 and via Express Mail to: Michael Foster, President Coastal Air Transport, Inc. P.O. Box 3985 Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00822 and the original and one copyviaFederal Express to: Hearing Docket U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 \

# ~=~~1 Legal Assistant 

### JUL 26 2012 Dated



### 2
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 144 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 144

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas November 17, 2000, is the 200th anniversary of the first meeting of 
        Congress in Washington, DC;
Whereas Congress, having previously convened at the Federal Hall in New York 
        City and at the Congress Hall in Philadelphia, has met in the United 
        States Capitol Building since November 17, 1800;
Whereas President John Adams, on November 22, 1800, addressed a joint session of 
        Congress in Washington, DC, for the first time, stating, ``I 
        congratulate the people of the United States on the assembling of 
        Congress at the permanent seat of their Government; and I congratulate 
        you, gentlemen, on the prospect of a residence not to be changed.'';
Whereas, on December 12, 1900, Congress convened a joint meeting to observe the 
        centennial of its residence in Washington, DC;
Whereas since its first meeting in Washington, DC, on November 17, 1800, 
        Congress has continued to cultivate and build upon a heritage of respect 
        for individual liberty, representative government, and the attainment of 
        equal and inalienable rights, all of which are symbolized in the 
        physical structure of the United States Capitol Building; and
Whereas it is appropriate for Congress, as the first branch of the government 
        under the Constitution, to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the 
        first meeting of Congress in Washington, DC, in order to focus public 
        attention on its present duties and responsibilities: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
    (1) November 17, 2000, be designated as a day of national 
observance for the 200th anniversary of the first meeting of Congress 
in Washington, DC; and
    (2) the people of the United States be urged and invited to observe 
such date by celebrating and examining the legislative process by which 
members of Congress convene and air differences, learn from one 
another, subordinate parochial interests, compromise, and work towards 
achieving a constructive consensus for the good of the people of the 
United States.

            Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 144

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 200th aniversary of the first meeting of Congress in 
                            Washington, DC.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of OMNI U.S.A., INC. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffery Daniel, Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
              78o(d)); and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ JEFFREY DANIEL
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
September 29, 2003


                                       46
#### STATE ex rel. Kenny LOVEJOY v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF QUACHITA.

No. 87-KH-2457.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 11, 1987.

In re Lovejoy, Kenny; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Quachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 65602.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Colette M. RYANS.

No. 87-K-2244.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Ryans, Colette M.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-6572; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 301-957.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 386.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron C. CHARLES.

No. 87-K-0346.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. KA-5291, KA-5292; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, Nos. 305-011, 304-686.

Prior report: La.App., 502 So.2d 1095.

Denied.
#### Larry Theodore SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-1892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Feb. 13, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joel E. Grigsby and Kevin Braggs, Asst. Public Defenders, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of robbery with a deadly weapon and sentenced to twenty-two years’ imprisonment. The sentence was within the recommended guidelines range.

Appellant contends that the court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict because appellant voluntarily returned the money to the victim after robbing him at gun point. Appellant’s argument centers on a voluntary renunciation theory indicating that the offense was not completed and there was no robbery.

We do not agree and affirm on the basis of *Johnson v. State,*432 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

We find no merit in the appellant’s other point on appeal.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Wayne Allen McClinton v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-1378.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re McClinton, Wayne Allen; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 113323.

Denied.