alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

KEITH BARTELLI,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

FOREST COUNTY AND CLERK OF

COURTS OF FOREST COUNTY,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 108 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of September , 2018, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief is DENIED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00137-CV

Rosco, Inc. d/b/a Grand Prairie Country Club, Appellant

v.

Horizon Distributors, Inc., Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. C-1-CV-07-005134, HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment

and dismissthis case without prejudice. We grant the motion, vacate the judgment without reference

to the merits, and dismiss this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(e). 

__________________________________________

Diane Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

Vacated and Remanded

Filed: March 28, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16845]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6950]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Peer Review Meeting.
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Lynn Rust, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
402-3938, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4e223c7c7c76380e20272660292138"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5d9c787878dc3f5dbdcdd9bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01).
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Roberta Binder, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7966, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83f1e1eaede7e6f1c3edeae2eae7adedeaebade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b594942454f4e596b45424a424f05454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).


    Dated: March 16, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6950 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Filed 9/18/13 P. v. Regalado CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALFREDO PEREZ REGALADO,

Defendant and Appellant. 2d Crim. No. B246487 (Super. Ct. No. CR44349 (1999)) (Ventura County)

Alfredo Perez Regalado appeals an order denying a petition to recall his 25-year-to-life sentence pursuant to th e procedure set forth in Penal Code section 1170.126, the Three St rikes Reform Act of 2012. 1 On February 25, 1999, Regalado wa s convicted of petty theft with a prior petty theft conviction. (§ 666.) Th e trial court found that Regalado suffered two prior serious felony stri ke convictions: a 1990 conviction for forcible rape and a 1983 conviction for kidnapping. (§§ 261, subd. (a), 207.) The court imposed a 25-year-to-life sentence pursuan t to the three strikes law. (§§ 667, subd. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d).) On November 15, 2012, Regala do filed a petition to recall his sentence pursuant to section 1170.126, su bdivision (b). The trial court denied the

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless stated otherwise.2 petition, ruling that Regala do did not qualify for resent encing because a prior strike offense was a "sexually violent o ffense" pursuant to sections 1170.12, subdivision (c)(2)(C)(iv), 667, subdiv ision (e)(2)(C)(iv), and Welfare and

Institutions Code section 6600. Regalado appealed. We appointed counsel to represent Regalado in this appeal. After

counsel's examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues. On June 10, 2013, we advised Re galado by mail that he had 30 days within which to person ally submit any contentions or i ssues that he wished to raise on appeal. We have not received a response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Regalado's attorney has fully complied with her re sponsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. ( People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

GILBERT, P. J.

We concur:

YEGAN, J.

PERREN, J.Kevin J. McGee, Judge Superior Court County of Ventura

________________ ______________

Jonathan B. Steiner, Kathleen C. Caverly for Defenda nt and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph LANDRY.

No. 87-K-0500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Landry, Joseph; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR86-753; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 84-0953-A.

Prior report: La.App., 502 So.2d 281.

Denied.
IIA

Calendar No. 19

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11

Prohibiting the use of funds for military operations in the Federal Republic

of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) unless Congress enacts specific

authorization in law for the conduct of those operations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire introduced the following joint resolution; which

was read the first time

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

JOINT RESOLUTION

Prohibiting the use of funds for military operations in the

Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)

unless Congress enacts specific authorization in law for

the conduct of those operations.

Whereas United States national security interests in Kosovo

do not rise to a level that warrants military operations

by the United States; and

Whereas Kosovo is a province in the Federal Republic of

Yugoslavia, a sovereign state: Now, therefore, be it
2

•SJ 11 PCS

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTRICTION ON USE OF FUNDS FOR MILI4 TARY OPERATIONS IN THE FEDERAL REPUB5 LIC OF YUGOSLAVIA (SERBIA AND MONTENE6 GRO).

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection

8 (b), none of the funds available to the Department of De9 fense (including prior appropriations) may be used for the

10 purpose of conducting military operations by the Armed

11 Forces of the United States in the Federal Republic of

12 Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro) unless Congress first

13 enacts a law containing specific authorization for the con14 duct of those operations.

15 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subsection (a) shall not apply

16 to—

17 (1) any intelligence or intelligence-related activ18 ity or surveillance or the provision of logistical sup19 port; or

20 (2) any measure necessary to defend the Armed

21 Forces of the United States against an immediate

22 threat.

Calendar No. 19

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 11

JOINT RESOLUTION

Prohibiting the use of funds for military operations

erations.authorization in law for the conduct of those opand Montenegro) unless Congress enacts specificin the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia

FEBRUARY 24, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                                 PRESSTEK, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                               JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                               -----------------------------
<S>                                      <C>
ABD Canada Holdings, Inc.                       Delaware
ABD International, Inc.                         Illinois
ABD International Company of Canada             Canada
A.B. Dick of UK Limited                         United Kingdom
HIC, Inc.                                       New Hampshire
Lasertel, Inc.                                  Arizona
Precision Acquisition Corporation               Delaware
Precision Lithograining Corporation             Massachusetts
R/H Acquisition Corporation                     New Hampshire
SDK Realty Corporation                          Massachusetts
</TABLE>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Paul ARSENEAU, Appellee.

No. 86-1901.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 28, 1987.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

The state appeals appellee’s mitigated guidelines sentence, alleging that the rea*188sons stated by the trial court were not so clear and convincing as to justify a downward departure.

Appellee was convicted of one count of criminal mischief and two counts of burglary. Appellee had a criminal history beginning in 1982 and continuing into 1986. Though this history included numerous acts of vandalism and automobile burglaries, the trial court felt that these activities were the result of appellee’s drug problem, which warranted more extensive treatment than is available in the Department of Corrections.

Appellee’s scoresheet indicated a presumptive guidelines sentence of 7-9 years’ imprisonment for the convictions. The trial court departed from the sentence recommended by the guidelines, sentencing ap-pellee to a combination of probation, a drug treatment program, and two years’ imprisonment with the Department of Corrections. In setting forth the reasons for the departure, the trial court cited *State v. Twelves,*463 So.2d 493 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), as justification for the departure.

We do not agree that the reasons for departure set forth in this case contain as sufficient detail as those set forth by the trial court in *Twelves.*In setting forth its reasons for departure, the trial court in *Twelves*explained the defendant’s history, citing expert evidence as to the disorder causing the defendant’s criminal conduct, and the programs available to remedy that disorder.

We therefore find that, as stated, the reasons given by the trial court are not clear and convincing, and we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing. If the trial court again decides to depart from the presumptive guidelines sentence, it must set forth sufficiently clear and convincing reasons to support that departure. Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17499-17500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7143]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCO956000.L14200000 BJ0000]


Notice of Filing of Plats

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plats; Colorado.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is 
publishing this notice to inform the public of the filing of the land 
survey plats listed below.

DATES: The plats described in this notice were filed on March 12, 2012.

ADDRESSES: BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield 
Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093.

[[Page 17500]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor 
for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The supplemental plat of Sections 32 and 33, 
in Township 12 South, Range 90 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, 
Colorado, was accepted and filed on March 12, 2012.
    The supplemental plat of Section 5, in Township 13 South, Range 90 
West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was accepted and filed on 
March 12, 2012.

Randy Bloom,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.
[FR Doc. 2012-7143 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
Exhibit 31.1

302(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cindy K. Swank, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of APD Antiquities, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



5.  The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



Date: May 20, 2005

/s/ Cindy K. Swank



Cindy K. Swank, President

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 2 to the
Registration Statement on Form F-2 (No. 333-76414) and Post-Effective Amendment
No. 4 to the Registration Statement on Form F-2 (No. 333-32524) of our report
dated June 21, 2002 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. We also consent to the reference to
us under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statements.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
--------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Hong Kong
July 3, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements for Capital Mortgage Plus L.P. and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000845875
<NAME>                        Art. 5 FDS For 4th Quarter 10.K
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             567,460
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,851,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   874,239
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,292,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              325,532
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,967,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,292,812
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,464,324
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   598,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   157,138
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,708,485
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,708,485
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 152 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 152

To make a technical correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4868.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

   Mr. Roth submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
To make a technical correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4868.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 4868) to amend the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States to modify temporarily certain 
rates of duty, to make other technical amendments to the trade laws, 
and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall 
make the following correction:
    On page 160, line 8, strike ``: and'' and all that follows through 
line 10, and insert a period.
                                 <all>
```
#### Gladys C. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 8068.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1940.

George E. Beach, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

George D. Bonebrake, of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of the District Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6256
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARK STEPHEN PAYNE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at R oanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-90-73-R, CA-97-77-R) Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Stephen Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Payne , Nos. CR-90-73-R; CA-97-77-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED