alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles DYE, et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee.

No. 5599.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 12, 1983.

Before BURKE, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ., and CUTLER, Superior Court Judge.

ORDER

On further consideration of the petition for hearing and the briefs and oral argument of the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The order of January 3, 1983, granting this petition for hearing, is vacated as improvidently entered.

2. The petition for hearing is denied.

CUTLER, Superior Court Judge, and COMPTON, J., dissent for the reasons stated in the attached dissenting opinion.

CUTLER, Judge,

joined by COMPTON, Justice, dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the court’s decision to dismiss the petition as improvidently granted. The court is ignoring an opportunity to guide trial courts in resolving an important fish and game search dilemma, a dilemma which was acknowledged when the petition for hearing, was granted originally.

I believe the Court of Appeals erred when it said that no search was performed by state fish and game biologist Dunaway when he lowered himself without announcement or permission into the hold of appellant’s vessel. *Dye v. State,*650 P.2d 418, 422 (Alaska App.1982). Dunaway inspected the hold for the specific purpose of observing undersized crab and reporting them to enforcement officials after his suspicions had been aroused while performing his duties as a bologist on deck. *Id.*Such conduct is a search by any standards, even in an industry where heavy government regulation is expected.

I think this court should determine whether that search was lawful or unlawful and explain why, even if a remand to the trial court for determination of additional facts is necessary. The Court of Appeals opinion adds unneeded confusion to search and seizure law, and carries *Wamser v. State,*600 P.2d 1359 (Alaska 1979) and *Nathanson v. State,*554 P.2d 456 (Alaska 1976) too far.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 29, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April
      21, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
      M. CancioHugo
      M. CancioTitle:
      Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS



I, Brian R. Riffle, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of KonaTel, Inc.; and



2. Based upon my knowledge,
this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report.



|Date: May 18, 2020 |     |                         | 
|------------------ | --- | ----------------------- | 
|                   |     |                         | 
|                   | By: | /s/
    Brian R. Riffle | 
|                   |     | Brian R. Riffle         | 
|                   |     | Chief Financial Officer |
#### Willie B. HARRISON v. Thomas W. PHILLIPS, Cloverleaf Bakeries, Inc. and the City of New Orleans and Officer W. Murray.

No. 89-C-0585.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Harrison, Willie B.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CA-1458; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86-5165. Prior report: La. App., 539 So.2d 911. Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE ex rel. John E. SPELLMAN v. Hon. Thomas McBRIDE, Judge, 34th Judicial District Court.

No. 89-KH-1296.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Spellman, John E.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 99-250; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89KW-0771.

Denied. Moot. This court has received a copy of the document sought and has sent a copy to relator.
S. Con. Res. 149 Agreed to October 12, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3244) to combat trafficking of persons, especially into the sex trade, slavery, and slavery-like conditions, in

the United States and countries around the world through prevention, through prosecution and enforcement against traffickers, and

through protection and assistance to victims of trafficking, shall

make the following correction:

In section 2002(a)(2)(A)(ii), strike ‘‘June 7, 1999,’’ and insert

‘‘December 13, 1999,’’.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Document

FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON
PENSION BENEFIT EQUALIZATION PLAN
(Effective January 1, 2009, as amended April 15, 2009)


WHEREAS, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (the “Bank”) has adopted and currently maintains the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Pension Benefit Equalization Plan, effective January 1, 2009, as amended April 15, 2009 and from time to time thereafter (as so amended, the “Pension BEP” or “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, Section 6.1 of the Pension BEP reserves to the Board of Directors of the Bank the right to amend or terminate the Plan, in whole or in part, without the consent of any Member, Beneficiary or other person (as such capitalized terms are defined in the Plan); provided, however, that no amendment or termination of the Plan shall retroactively impair or otherwise adversely affect the rights of any Member or Beneficiary to benefits under the Plan which have accrued prior to the date of such action; and
    WHEREAS, the Bank desires to freeze the Pension BEP to new participants effective January 1, 2021, and to freeze all further benefit accruals under the Plan effective January 1, 2024: 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Pension BEP is hereby further amended as set forth below:
1.Section 1.11 of the Pension BEP is amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof, effective January 1, 2021:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no employee shall become an Eligible Executive in the Plan on or after January 1, 2021, except to the extent such employee was previously an employee of the Bank participating in the Qualified Plan and is rehired prior to January 1, 2024 and prior to incurring a one-year break in service so as to be eligible to accrue additional benefits under the Qualified Plan.
2.Section 2.3 of the Pension BEP is amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof, effective January 1, 2024:










No Executive shall accrue additional benefits under the Plan after December 31, 2023.  On and after January 1, 2024, no Executive shall become eligible for enhanced disability benefits or enhanced active service death benefits (as such benefits are described in the Qualified Plan) under this Plan.
3.Section 3.1 of the Pension BEP is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the penultimate paragraph thereof, effective January 1, 2024:
No Executive shall accrue additional benefits under the Plan after December 31, 2023.
4.Section 4.1 of the Pension BEP is amended by adding the following sentence to the end thereof, effective January 1, 2024:
No additional benefits shall accrue under the Plan after December 31, 2023.


Executed this __30th_ day of __November____, 2020.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF BOSTON 




By:  /s/ Barry F. Gale_______
Barry F. Gale
SVP/Chief Human Resources Officer, OMWI Director
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, the Chairwoman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel
Group (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      May 6, 2008
            /s/ Jiangping JiangJiangping
      JiangChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Humberto Bravo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Placer Del Mar's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Placer Del Mar, Ltd.


Date: November 10, 2008               By: /s/ Humberto Bravo
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Humberto Bravo
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that Placer Del Mar, Ltd. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00364

- CR No. 10

- 15

- 00365

- CR No. 10

- 15

- 00367

- CR No. 10

- 15

- 00368

- CR

JEREMIAH TENNON , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 278th District Court Walker County, Texas Trial Court No s
. 26,693 , 26,695 , 26,799 and 26,807

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jeremiah Vadald Tennon appeals the trial court’s judgments dated May 28, 2015.

Tennon’s notice of appeal for each appeal is untimely. The notices were due June 29,

2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a). The notices were filed on October 23, 2015.Tennon v. State Page 2

This Co urt has no jurisdiction over an appeal where the notice of appeal is

untimely. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly,

these appeals are dismissed. 1

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Jus tice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeals dismissed Opinion delivered and filed October 2 9 , 2015 Do not publish [CR25]

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days after either the day this Court’s judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing was overruled by this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2(a).
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Thomas M. O’Flynn, Chief Executive Officer of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

|/s/ Thomas M. O’Flynn  
|-----------------------
|Thomas M. O’Flynn      
|Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 9, 2008      

---
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

JPS INDUSTRIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JPS Industries, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending November 2, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles R. Tutterow, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act                      of 1934; and         
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                           |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Charles R. TutterowCharles R. Tutterow
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary |  | 

June 16, 2003

18
POWER OF ATTORNEY

We the undersigned officers and directors of People's Savings Financial
Corp., hereby severally constitute Richard S. Mansfield, and John G. Medvec
and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys with full power of
substitution, to sign for us and in our names in the capacities indicated
below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of People's Savings Financial Corp. for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and generally to do all such things
in our name and behalf in our capacities as officers and directors to enable
People's Savings Financial Corp. to comply with the provisions of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, all requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commissioner, and all requirements of any other
applicable law of regulation, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures
as they may be signed by our said attorneys, or any of them, to said Annual
Report.


Signature                 Title                        Date

/s/Richard S. Mansfield   President & Chief Executive  March 18, 1997
                          Officer

/s/John G. Medvec         Executive Vice President     March 18, 1997

/s/Joseph A. Welna        Chairman of the Board        March 18, 1997
                          and Director

/s/Robert A. Gryboski     Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/Walter J. Liss         Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/Robert A. Story        Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/Walter D. Blogoslawski Director                     March 18, 1997

Stanley P. Filewicz       Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/Roland L. LeClerc      Director                     March 18, 1997

Chester S. Sledzik        Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/Henry Poplaski         Director                     March 18, 1997

/s/A. Richard Puskarz     Director                     March 18, 1997
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 53

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning all prejudice against individuals of Asian and

Pacific Island ancestry in the United States.

Whereas the belief that all persons have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is a truth that individuals in the United States hold as self-evident;

Whereas all individuals in the United States are entitled to

the equal protection of law;

Whereas individuals of Asian and Pacific Island ancestry

have made profound contributions to life in the United

States, including the arts, the economy, education, the

sciences, technology, politics, and sports, among other

areas;

Whereas individuals of Asian and Pacific Island ancestry

have demonstrated their patriotism by honorably serving

to defend the United States in times of armed conflict,

from the Civil War to the present;
2

SCON 53 RFH

Whereas recent allegations of espionage and illegal campaign

financing involve allegations of misconduct by certain individuals, such allegations should not result in questioning the loyalty and probity of individuals of the same

or similar ancestry in the United States, simply due to

such ancestry; and

Whereas individuals of Asian and Pacific Island ancestry

have suffered discrimination and unfounded accusations

of disloyalty throughout the history of the United States,

resulting in discriminatory laws, including the former Act

of May 6, 1882 (22 Stat. 58, chapter 126) (often referred to as the ‘‘Chinese Exclusion Act’’) and a 1913

California law relating to alien-owned land, and discriminatory actions, including internment of patriotic and

loyal individuals of Japanese ancestry during the Second

World War, the repatriation of Filipino immigrants, and

the prohibition of individuals of Asian and Pacific Island

ancestry from owning property, voting, testifying in

court, or attending school with other people in the United

States: Now, therefore be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) Congress condemns all prejudice against in4 dividuals of Asian and Pacific Island ancestry in the

5 United States; and

6 (2) it is the sense of Congress that—

7 (A) no individual in the United States

8 should stereotype or generalize the actions of an

9 individual to an entire group of people;
3

SCON 53 RFH

1 (B) individuals of Asian and Pacific Island

2 ancestry in the United States are entitled to all

3 due process rights and privileges afforded to all

4 individuals in the United States; and

5 (C) all executive agencies should act within

6 their respective jurisdictions in accordance with

7 existing civil rights laws.

Passed the Senate July 27, 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
#### Isabel Anglade, Wife of Franklin D. TOUPS v. Franklin D. TOUPS.

No. 87-C-1093.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Toups, Isabel Anglade; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-0711; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 239-147.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 173.

Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2441 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain windsock type decoys. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain windsock type 

decoys. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WINDSOCK TYPE DECOYS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Windsock type decoys with 

silhouette heads, internal 

framed body to maintain 

shape in low winds, and 

spring steel stake system for 

wind induced movement (provided for in subheading 

9507.90.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2441 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1** CERTIFICATION         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Arthur F.    Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of The Prudential Insurance    Company of America, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual    Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006, containing the    financial statements of The Prudential Variable Contract Real    Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance    Company of America) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real    Property Partnership (the “Report”), fully complies    with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15    (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property    Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property    Partnership.     Date: March 23, 2007 /s/  Arthur    F. Ryan    Name: Arthur F. Ryan     Title:     Chief Executive Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as    part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### STATE ex rel. Nathan E. ARNOLD v. Hilton BUTLER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-2412.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Arnold, Nathan E.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW87-0741; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 46981.

Denied.
Ley, Aloha (OST)

From: Sent: To: Subject: Stephen Clark <retiredclark@yahoo.com> Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:04 PM Ley, Aloha (OSn Why A Grant? 2PfZ

Perhaps I don't grasp the concept involved for private sector businesses trying to get RDM to LAXair service. Ifthis looked like a viable linkthat would run at a profit it would seem**tha~airF!les** would decide_to provide the service. Since thathas nothappened, and other links from RDM have been dropped over time due to insufficient revenues, it makes no sense to me to use my tax dollars to II

...help less populated areas strengthen air service. II Iflocal businesses want to lobby for this service let them do it with their ownmoney, not mine. ·· · Regards, Stephen Clark Taxpayer Bend, Oregon

1 .. ··-.



# ---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Dallas DUPRE.

No. 87-K-0198.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 86 KA 0557; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 12-84-742.

Prior report: La.App., 500 So.2d 873.

Denied.

WATSON and LEMMON, JJ„ would grant the writ.