alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7102]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security.
    Title: Request for Investigation Under Section 232 of the Trade 
Expansion Act.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0120.
    Form Number(s): N/A.
    Type of Request: Regular.
    Burden Hours: 3,000 hours.
    Number of Respondents: 400 respondents.
    Average Hours per Response: 7.5 hours per response.
    Needs and Uses: Upon request, BIS will initiate an investigation to 
determine the effects of imports of specific commodities on the 
national security, and will make the findings known to the President 
for possible adjustments to imports through tariffs. The findings are 
made publicly available and are reported to Congress. The purpose of 
this collection is to account for the public burden associated with the 
surveys distributed to determine the impact on national security.
    Affected Public: Businesses and other for-profit institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, FAX number (202) 395-7285.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b11111e08080e0b3b1f1418551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0963636c7a7a7c79496d666a276e667f">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f756c7a7a776d7e5f70727d317a706f31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81ebf2e4e4e9f3e0c1eeece3afe4eef1afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a>, or by fax to (202) 395-7285.

    Dated: March 20, 2012.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-7102 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each of
the undersigned officers of Cyalume Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q to which this certification is attached (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      May 13, 2009
                            /s/  DEREK
      DUNAWAYDerek
      Dunaway, Chief Executive Officer(the
      Principal Executive Officer)





Date:
      May 13, 2009
                          /s/  MICHAEL
      BIELONKOMichael
      Bielonko, Chief Financial Officer(the
      Principal Financial Officer)





This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated
into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
the Securities Act of 1933.
<PAGE>
                                       
                                  EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF ARMANDO IBARRAB

                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


      The undersigned indpendent certified public accounting firm hereby 
consents to the inclusion of its report on the financial statements of 
Commercial Labor Management, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 
1996, and to the reference to it as experts in accounting and auditing 
relating to said financial statements, in the Report on Form 10-K, dated 
December 31, 1996.





/s/  ARMANDO IBARRA, C.P.A.
---------------------------------
     Armando Ibarra, C.P.A.


Chula Vista, California
January 15, 1997
#### STATE of Louisiana v. David L. CHARNEY.

No. K89-242.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

March 13, 1989.

Richard leyoub, Dist. Atty., David L. Kimball and Elizabeth S. McCall, Asst. Dist. Attys., Lake Charles, for applicant.

Evelyn M. Oubre, Lake Charles, for respondents.

Before FORET, LABORDE and KNOLL, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY.

The trial judge’s order releasing the defendant from the custody of the Calcasieu Parish jail is vacated and set aside. Since La.C.Cr.P. art. 701(C) does not provide a remedy for its violation, the state’s failure to meet that thirty day period must be weighed in accordance with the four factors enumerated in *Barker v. Wingo,*407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); *State v. Cody,*446 So.2d 1278 (La.App. 2 Cir.1984). After having weighed those factors against the facts of this case, we find that the defendant was not prejudiced by the delay in arraignment and that it was error for the lower court to order the release of the defendant.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 14, 2020

No. 04-19-00892-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.M.R., A CHILD

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-02001

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s amended second motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Warren B. Kanders, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Armor Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.



Date: May 10, 2004                             By: /s/ Warren B. Kanders
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Warren B. Kanders
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
#### Florence Perritt Rabb FEAZEL, et al. v. Robert R. HOWARD.

No. 87-C-2089.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Howard, Robert R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18914-CA; Parish of Lincoln, 3rd Judicial District Court, Div. *“A”,*No. 32496.

Prior report: La.App., 511 So.2d 1306.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 3.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                        ALLOU HEALTH & BEAUTY CARE, INC.


          It is hereby certified that:

          1. The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation")
is Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc.

          2. The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (hereinafter
called the "Certificate of Incorporation") is hereby amended by (i) deleting the
number 13,200,000 in the first sentence of Article Fourth and inserting the
number 18,200,000 in its place and (ii) deleting the number 10,000,000 in clause
(i) of the first sentence of Article Fourth and inserting the number 15,000,000
in its place.

          3. The amendments of the Certificate of Incorporation herein certified
have been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


Dated:  October 19, 1998

                                              /s/ Herman Jacobs
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Herman Jacobs, President and
                                               and Chief Operating Officer

Attest:



/s/ Jack Jacobs
----------------------------------
Jack Jacobs, Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the periodic report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, CINDY K. SWANK, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date:  December 6, 2006



By: /s/ Cindy K. Swank



Cindy K. Swank, President

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13041 and #13042]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Missouri dated 03/15/2012. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Hail, High Winds, Heavy Rain, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         02/28/2012 through 03/01/2012.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         03/15/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/14/2012. *Economic Injury (Eidl) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/17/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Dallas, Stone, Taney. Contiguous Counties: Missouri: Barry, Camden, Christian, Douglas, Greene, Hickory, Laclede, Lawrence, Ozark, Polk, Webster. Arkansas: Boone, Carroll, Marion. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.750Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13041B and for economic injury is 130420. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Missouri, Arkansas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: March 15, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-7112 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17525-17526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7160]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-80,487]

Stimson Lumber Company Arden Division Including On-Site Leased 
Workers From Securitas Security Services USA and Briteway Janitorial 
Colville, WA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility 
to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade 
Adjustment Assistance on January 18, 2012, applicable to workers and 
former workers of Stimson Lumber Company, Arden Division, Colville, 
Washington. The workers are engaged in activities related to the 
production of cedar lumber. The Department's Notice was published in 
the Federal Register on February 14, 2012 (77 FR 8283).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm and the new information 
supplied by the State.
    The Department determines that workers from Securitas Security 
Services USA and Briteway Janitorial were employed on-site at the 
Colville, Washington location of Stimson Lumber Company and were 
sufficiently under the control of Stimson Lumber Company to be 
considered leased workers.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm adversely affected by customer imports of 
articles from Canada.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Securitas Security 
Services USA and Briteway Janitorial working on-site

[[Page 17526]]

at the Colville, Washington location of the subject firm.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-80,487 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Stimson Lumber Company, Arden Division, including 
on-site leased workers from Securitas Security Services USA and 
Briteway Janitorial, Colville, Washington, who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after September 27, 2010, 
through January 18, 2014, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, and are also 
eligible to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under 
Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of March 2012.
 Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7160 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
#### Anthony AKINS, et al. v. PARISH OF JEFFERSON, et al. COLONIAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOARD of COMMISSIONERS, et al. and Other Consolidated Cases.

No. 88-CC-1755.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 28, 1988.

In re Jefferson Parish Council; Russo, Peter; Evans, Robert; Giardina, Lloyd; Ward, T.J.; Lawson, James; Hooper, Larry; DeViney, Robert L.; Hof, Willie; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number 87-CW-0766; Parish of Jefferson 24th Judicial District Court Div. “J” Number 320-790, 335-915, 335-980, 340-375, 340-382.

Granted in part. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed in part, and the exception of prescription is maintained in the *Weatherspoon*case. See *Texaco, Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish Government,*527 So.2d 1128 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988), *cert, denied*533 So.2d 359 (La.1988). Otherwise, denied.

WATSON, J.,

concurs in the action of the Court except he would grant as to the cause of action issue.

LEMMON, J.,

concurs. I grudgingly agree that La.C.C.P. art. 856, which allows conditions of mind to be alleged generally, may defeat the exception of no cause of action, which is decided only on the petition. See *Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.,*444 So.2d 618 (La.1984). Relator is therefore relegated to raising the issue by motion for summary judgment.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 18 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 18

 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 1999

 Mr. Ashcroft submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
 tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
                 home should not be further restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal, which promotes social and 
        economic benefits beyond the benefits that accrue to the occupant of the 
        home;
Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting economic security and 
        stability for American families;
Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should 
        continue to be to encourage homeownership;
Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10 years has been 
        greater than the increase in family income;
Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of people in the United 
        States owning their own homes has declined;
Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 
        29 who own their own home has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 
        percent today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation's 
        housing policy for most of this century and may well be the most 
        important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;
Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt 
        secured by second homes is of crucial importance to the economies of 
        many communities;
Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt secured by a first 
        or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable 
        social goals, such as education of young people; and
Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a 
        first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was 
        further eroded as a result of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 
        1990: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income 
tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second 
home should not be further restricted.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Bela G. ANDRASI v. CLERK OF COURT, 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.

No. 87-KH-2436.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 16, 1987.

In re Andrasi, Bela G.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of East Baton *468Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.