alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2005 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
Exhibit 10.1


 


GI
DYNAMICS, INC.


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT TO SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), dated effective as of November 30, 2020, is made to that certain SERIES
A PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT, dated August 10, 2020, as amended on October 31, 2020 (as so amended, the “Agreement”),
by and between GI DYNAMICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and the investors
listed on Exhibit A attached to the Agreement (the “Purchasers”). Capitalized terms used herein and
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 6.11 of the Agreement, any term of the Agreement may be amended, waived or modified only with the written
consent of the Company and the holders of at least a majority of the then-outstanding Shares; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the only Purchaser, as of the date hereof, desire to further amend the Agreement to extend the Final Closing Date
from November 30, 2020 to December 22, 2020.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the undersigned Purchaser and the Company, in consideration of the mutual premises and covenants made herein and of
the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom, hereby amend the Agreement as follows:


 


	 	1.	Amendment
        to the Agreement. All references to the term “Final Closing Date” in the Agreement shall be deemed and
        each such reference is hereby replaced with the following:

         

        “Final
        Closing Date” shall mean December 22, 2020.



 


	 	2.	Except
    as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.


 


	 	3.	This
    Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
    shall constitute the same instrument. Facsimile or PDF transmission of execution copies or signature pages for this Amendment
    shall be legal, valid and binding execution and delivery for all purposes.


 


	 	4.	This
Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the substantive laws of the State of Delaware,
without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.



 


(Signatures
        Pages Immediately Follow)


 






     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned party has executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


COMPANY:


 


	GI
    DYNAMICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Charles R. Carter	 
	Name: 	Charles
    R. Carter	 
	Title:	CFO,
    Secretary, Treasurer	 


 


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned party has executed this amendment as of the date first written above.


 


PURCHASER:


 


CRYSTAL
AMBER FUND LIMITED


 


By:
Crystal Amber Asset Management (Guernsey) Limited, as

Investment Manager


 


	By:	/s/
    Laurence McNairn	 
	Name: 	Laurence
    McNairn	 
	Title:	Director
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T J AN 15, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 7

- 1 0 0 8 0 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 6

- 0 0 1 3 6

- C R

- W S

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

E R V I N B E R N A R D E A R L ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f A l a b a m a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( J a n u a r y 1 5 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e B L A C K , B A R K E T T a n d M A R C U S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

B a r r e C

. D u m a s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r E r v i n B e r n a r d E a r l , h a s f i l e d am o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
.

C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t

r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f

t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s

n o i s s u e s o f a r g u a b l e m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D a n d

E a r l ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a r e A F F I R M E D

. W e n o t e , h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e j u d g m e n t a n d t h e

o r d e r m e m o r i a l i z i n g t h e j u r y ’ s v e r d i c t i n c o r r e c t l y s u b s t i t u t e 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 8 5 3 f o r

1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 5 1 3

. T h e r e f o r e , w e V A C A T E a n d R E M A N D w i t h i n s t r u c t i o n s t h a t

t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t c o r r e c t t h e j u d g m e n t a n d t h e o r d e r m e m o r i a l i z i n g t h e j u r y ’ s

v e r d i c t b y r e p l a c i n g 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 8 5 3 w i t h 1 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 5 1 3

.

2
Exhibit
      32 .1




Certification
      Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              October 13, 2006
            
            /s/
              JOHN
              R. DUNN IIJohn
              R. Dunn IICEO
                and President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-89701, 333-66913, 333-44877, 333-43905,
333-36527, 333-26869, 333-24753, 333-2600, 333-89701, 333-51642, 333-60676,
333-68096, 333-68586, 333-91138) of Verity, Inc. of our report dated June 17,
2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
August 15, 2002
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of MailTec, Inc.., on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Jeff A.
Hanks, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.






Date: November 15, 2007         /s/Jeff A. Hanks
                                ----------------
                                  Jeff A. Hanks
                               Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                               Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 121 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas Representative Stephen S. F. Chen has been a member of Taiwan's 
        diplomatic service for forty-seven years;
Whereas Representative Chen has represented Taiwan's interests in such countries 
        as the Philippines, Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia, and the United States;
Whereas Representative Chen has held a number of important positions in his 
        government at home, including those of Vice Foreign Minister and Deputy 
        Secretary-General to President Lee Teng-hui;
Whereas Representative Chen's many years of service in the United States include 
        appointments as Taiwan's Consul-General in Atlanta from 1973 to 1979 and 
        as Director of the Coordination Council for North American Affairs in 
        Chicago from 1980 to 1982 and Los Angeles from 1988 to 1989;
Whereas Representative Chen has served with distinction as Taiwan's senior 
        diplomat in the United States since 1997, when he became the 
        Representative of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office 
        in Washington, D.C.; and
Whereas Representative Chen has been a friend of the United States and earned 
        the respect and genuine affection of many Members of the Senate and 
        House of Representatives: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) Representative Stephen Chen is to be congratulated for 
        his many years of distinguished service to Taiwan and for his 
        friendship to the United States; and
            (2) the best wishes of Congress are to be extended to 
        Representative Chen and his family on the occasion of his 
        retirement.

            Passed the Senate June 9, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 121

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating Representative Stephen S. F. Chen on the occasion of his 
    retirement from the diplomatic service of Taiwan, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41146 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JESUS ALBERTO DE LEON Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:06-CR-1501 ALL Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to representJesusAlberto De Leon has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). De Leon has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01057

- CR

ROY OLIVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F 17

- 18595

- V



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 3, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file his

brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due by March 8 , 2019

.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
#### Edward Michael McCABE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BD-305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 15, 1988.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, Terry P. Lewis, Sp. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Domberg v. State,*518 So.2d 1360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

SMITH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION OF 10-KSB REPORT OF




ZYNEX MEDICAL HOLDINGS,
INC.


FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
2007







Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of Zynex Medical
Holdings, Inc. (“Zynex”), that to his knowledge:





1.
            The
      amendment number 1 to the 10-KSB/A Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in such 10-KSB/A Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Zynex.





This
written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
as an exhibit to the 10-KSB/A Report. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to Zynex and will be retained by Zynex and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This
Certification is executed as of April 16, 2008.








/s/ Thomas
Sandgaard


Thomas
Sandgaard


President
and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Fritz G.
Allison


Fritz G.
Allison


Chief
Financial Officer
#### Ruby HANKINS v. WOMAN’S HOSPITAL.

No. 87-C-2687.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1988.

In re Hankins, Ruby; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1403; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 295372.

*512Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 217.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 42

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued by the United States

Postal Service honoring the members of the Armed

Forces who have been awarded the Purple Heart.

Whereas the Order of the Purple Heart for Military Merit,

commonly known as the Purple Heart, is the oldest military decoration in the world in present use;

Whereas the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the

President of the United States to members of the Armed

Forces who are wounded in conflict with an enemy force

or while held by an enemy force as a prisoner of war, and

posthumously to the next of kin of members of the

Armed Forces who are killed in conflict with an enemy

force or who die of a wound received in conflict with an

enemy force;

Whereas the Purple Heart was established on August 7,

1782, during the Revolutionary War, when General

George Washington issued an order establishing the Hon-
2

SCON 42 RFH

orary Badge of Distinction, otherwise known as the

Badge of Military Merit or the Decoration of the Purple

Heart;

Whereas the award of the Purple Heart ceased with the end

of the War of the Revolution, but was revived out of respect for the memory and military achievements of

George Washington in 1932, the year marking the 200th

anniversary of his birth; and

Whereas 1999 is the year marking the 200th anniversary of

the death of George Washington: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service honoring

5 the members of the Armed Forces who have been

6 awarded the Purple Heart; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

9 such a stamp be issued in 1999, the year marking

10 the 200th anniversary of the death of George Wash11 ington.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
#### Karolee MAIR, Plaintiff, v. LLOYD BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and Kevin Dean Sweat, Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Marla Mair WEBB, Third-Party Defendant and Respondent.

No. 18702.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 9, 1984.

*867L.L. Summerhays, Salt Lake City, for appellant Lloyd Bros. Const. Co.

Robert H. Henderson, Salt Lake City, for third-party defendant and respondent Marla Mair Webb.

Don R. Petersen, Provo, for plaintiff Ka-rolee Mair.

HOWE, Justice:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a third-party complaint filed by the defendants.

The plaintiff was injured while riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by her daughter when that vehicle collided with a truck driven by the defendant, Kevin Dean Sweat, and owned by his employer, defendant Lloyd Brothers Construction Company. Plaintiff brought suit against both defendants who in turn filed a third-party complaint against the plaintiffs daughter, Marla Mair Webb, alleging that she was negligent, that her negligence contributed to the accident, and that she was liable to the defendants for contribution to any damages for which they might be found liable. The trial court dismissed the third-party complaint on the motion of Mrs. Webb on the ground that she could not be legally liable for her mother’s injuries under our guest statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-9-1, and therefore she was not liable to the defendants for contribution to any damages which might be found against them.

While the appeal of the instant case was pending, we decided *Malan v.*Lewis, Utah, No. 17606, decided May 1, 1984, in which we declared our guest statute, § 41-9-1, unconstitutional. In view of that holding, Mrs. Webb could be found to be a joint tort feasor and thus subject to contribution to the defendants for any amount of damage adjudged against them.

The order dismissing the third-party complaint is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Costs are awarded to the defendants.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART and DURHAM, JJ., concur.

OAKS, J., having resigned, does not participate herein.
EXHIBIT 21
MERCURY FINANCE COMPANY

SUBSIDIARIES

Mercury Finance Corporation of Alabama (Ala)
Mercury Finance Company of Arizona (Ariz)
Merc Finance Company of California (Cal)
Mercury Finance Company of Colorado (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Delaware (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Florida (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Georgia (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Illinois (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Idaho (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Iowa (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Indiana (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Kansas (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Kentucky (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Louisiana (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Michigan (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Mississippi (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Missouri (MO)
Mercury Finance Company of Nevada (Nev)
Mercury Finance Company of New Mexico (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of New York (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of North Carolina (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Ohio (Del)
MFC Finance Company of Oklahoma (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Oregon (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Pennsylvania (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of South Carolina (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Tennessee (Tenn)
MFC Finance Company of Texas (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Utah (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Virginia (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Washington (Del)
Mercury Finance Company of Wisconsin (Del)
MFC Financial Services, Inc. (Fla)
Filco Marketing Company (Del)
Gulfco Investment Inc. (La)
Gulfco Finance Company (La)
Gulfco Life Insurance Company (La)*
Midland Finance Co. (IL)
Lyndon Life Insurance Company (MO)*
Lyndon Property Insurance Company (MO)*
Twin Mercury Life Insurance Company (AZ)*
Lyndon-DFS Warranty Services, Inc. (MO)*
Lyndon General Agency of Texas (TX)*
Lyndon Southern Insurance Company (La)*
MFN Insurance Company (Turks and Caicos)

*  Lyndon Property Insurance Company and its subsidiaries were sold on June 3,
1997.
#### Garland McELWEE v. Jonathan W. HAMMOND, et al. Tina Ann Chandler WELCH, et al. v. Jonathan W. HAMMOND, et al.

No. 89-CC-1301.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Spohrer Construction Co. Inc.; Highlands Insurance Co.; Barber Brothers *1222Contr. Co. Inc.; Pearce & LeBlanc Inc.;— Defendants); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Pointe Coupee, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 22833, 23180; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW89 0321.

Denied.

WATSON and COLE, JJ., would grant summary judgment.
#### Sally Maddox CHELETTE v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.

No. 89-C-0060.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Wal-Mart Stores Inc.;—Defendant^); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-1059; Parish of Rapides, Pineville City Court, No. 86-132.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

YUSEF WHITEHEAD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 134 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.