alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Xin Zhang, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form
10-QSB of Universal Travel Group.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: August 14, 2007                /s/ Xin Zhang
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name: Xin Zhang
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1





                             EXHIBIT NUMBER 10.12.3





<PAGE>   2


                       THIRD LOAN AGREEMENT MODIFICATION


         This THIRD LOAN AGREEMENT MODIFICATION (hereinafter called
"Modification") is entered into on this date by and between FRANKLIN FINANCIAL
CORPORATION ("Borrower"), a Tennessee corporation; and FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL
BANK ("Lender"), a national banking association with principal offices located
in Davidson County, Tennessee.

                                  WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, Borrower on December 8, 1993, executed a Master Promissory
Note evidencing a line of credit from Lender (the "Note");

         WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender entered into a Loan Agreement on December
8, 1993, in connection with the Note from Lender to Borrower (the "Loan
Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender entered into a Master Promissory Note and
Loan Agreement Modification on September 20, 1994, and a Second Master
Promissory Note and Loan Agreement Modification on December 29, 1995, in
connection with both the Note and Loan Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
mutually acknowledged, the Loan Agreement, as previously modified, is hereby
modified as follows:

         The amount as presented in paragraph 1.1 of the Loan Agreement, and as
later modified, shall now be modified to the amount of $6,000,000.

         Except as modified and amended hereby, all the terms and conditions
set forth in the Note and Loan Agreement remain unchanged and are hereby
reaffirmed by Borrower as of this date.

         Executed on January 31, 1997.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FRANKLIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION                              FIRST AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
("Borrower")                                                ("Lender")

<S>                                                         <C>
By:      /s/ Richard Herrington                             By:    /s/ Leroy Brown
   ----------------------------------------                        ------------------------------------------------------

Title:   President                                          Title:   Senior Vice President
      -------------------------------------                          ----------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00337

- CV
In the Interest of D.G.H. Jr., a child
On Appeal from the 126th District Court of Travis County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D

- 1

- FM

- 08

- 000053

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. No costs are assessed as appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 5, 2022
S A N I T I Z E D

EPICLON HP-4700

HYDROLYSIS TEST
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 15d-14(a)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Craig E. Holmes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Goodman Networks Incorporated; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                       |  |  |  |  |  |                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------
|Date: February 2, 2015 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Craig E. Holmes           
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Craig E. Holmes         
|                       |  |  |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           647,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    472,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     140,000
<INVENTORY>                                    2,135,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,542,000
<PP&E>                                           199,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,655,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,741,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,469,000
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                          28,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,244,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,741,000
<SALES>                                        5,654,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,654,000
<CGS>                                          4,016,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,016,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,658,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 115,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,968,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,968,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,968,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.23)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00364-CR

No. 10-15-00365-CR

No. 10-15-00367-CR

No. 10-15-00368-CR

JEREMIAH TENNON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 278th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 26,693, 26,695, 26,799 and 26,807

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jeremiah Vadald Tennon appeals the trial court’s judgments dated May 28, 2015. 

Tennon’s notice of appeal for each appeal is untimely. The notices were due June 29, 

2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). The notices were filed on October 23, 2015. 
Tennon v. State Page 2

This Court has no jurisdiction over an appeal where the notice of appeal is 

untimely. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Accordingly, 

these appeals are dismissed.1

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 29, 2015

Do not publish

[CR25]

 

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment of this Court is rendered. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a petition 

for discretionary review, that petition must be filed with the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 days 

after either the day this Court’s judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing 

was overruled by this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).
# Protecting Children at Schools and 

# Other Outdoor Environments

Kathy Murray, Moderator Maine Department of Agriculture, Food and Rural Resources

Kathy.murray@maine.gov

# Session Goals

• Discuss IPM practices used effectively at schools and other outdoor environments to reduce children’s risks of exposure to tick- borne diseases 

### • Identify priority needs and knowledge gaps in research, education, regulation and implementation to protect children at schools 

### and other outdoor environments. • Develop coordinated strategies for community IPM programs and strengthen partnerships 

### among organizations, agencies, schools and other public facilities.

# Tick IPM is People Management

at Schools Communication and Coordination is Key Coaches & Athletic Directors

# Role of the School Nurse

 Prevent and identify tick borne illnesses in schools  Early detection and referral • Monitor student’s symptoms to improve outcomes • Advocate for post- diagnosis accommodations for students with ongoing symptoms  Provide guidance to parents and guardians • Prevention, detection and treatment  Assist with school district policy development

## Friends Community School Multiple Point IPM Plan • Field policy and dress code • Teacher education • Parent education • Biannual testing • Duct tape for each teacher • Repellent • Pyrethrins on socks • Garlic barrier spraying program • Deer feeder • Tick tubes spring and fall • ChickensTick Threat

# What’s Needed to Protect Children from Tick- Borne Diseases?

• Research needs? • Education needs? 

### • What are the barriers? • Opportunities?

# Panel

• Thomas Green , IPM Institute of North America 

### • Christine Dunathan , Friends Community School, College Park, MD • Benedict Pagac , U.S. Army Public Health 

### Command - Region North • Sally Schoessler , National Association of School Nurses 

### • Herbert Bolton , USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture • Audrey Moore , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2 

### • Clara Fuentes , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

# Charge questions 1) What is your organization doing to protect children from tick- borne diseases at schools and other public spaces, what challenges do you face, and what should EPA do to help you to overcome those challenges and support your programs. 2) What guidance can you offer to school administration and staff, or to managers of parks, children’s camps and other outdoor spaces frequented by children, in terms of facilities management, education, and stable funding sources if needed, to reduce risk of tick- borne diseases. 3) What are the top priority needs for research to reduce children’s risk of exposure to tick- borne diseases at schools and other outdoor environments.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/23/2010 09:35 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |"Higgins,Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Fred | |Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |07/14/2010 10:14 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |slides for SI RICE NESHAP tomorrow | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Cortney, Welcome back, hope you had a great vacation. Here are the slides for the briefing tomorrow as well as a summary of the emissions data and MACT floor calculation for each subcategory. I'm working on a more detailed breakdown of the costs that I'll be sending you as well but I probably won't have it to you before the call.

Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov(See attached file: SI RICE NESHAP OMB briefing 7-15- 10.ppt)(See attached file: Existing SI RICE NESHAP MACT Floors 7-14-10.xls)
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Duma Energy Corporation f/k/a Strategic American Oil 

Corporation and Galveston Bay Energy, LLC v. ERG 

Resources, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-14-00147-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-37552

Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County

Appellants, Duma Energy Corporation f/k/a Strategic American Oil Corporation 

and Galveston Bay Energy, LLC, representing that the parties are in active settlement 

discussions and need additional time to finalize the settlement, have filed an unopposed 

motion requesting that the Court abate this appeal. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal. Appellants are directed to advise the Court 

regarding the status of the settlement proceedings, or file a motion to reinstate and a 

motion to dismiss the appeal, or other appropriate motion, no later than 30 days from the 

date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: November 20, 2014
#### STATE of Louisiana v. George C. LILL.

No. 87-K-2473.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Lili, George C.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA87 0223; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 7-86-941.

Denied.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 142

Relating to the reestablishment of representative government in Afghanistan.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. TORRICELLI) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign

Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Relating to the reestablishment of representative government

in Afghanistan.

Whereas Afghanistan has existed as a sovereign nation since

1747, maintaining its independence, neutrality, and dignity;

Whereas Afghanistan had maintained its own decisionmaking

through a traditional process called a ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’, or

Grand Assembly, by selecting, respecting, and following

the decisions of their leaders;

Whereas recently warlords, factional leaders, and foreign regimes have laid siege to Afghanistan, leaving the landscape littered with landmines, making the most fundamental activities dangerous;
2

•SCON 142 IS

Whereas in recent years, and especially since the Taliban

came to power in 1996, Afghanistan has become a haven

for terrorist activity, has produced most of the world’s

opium supply, and has become infamous for its human

rights abuses, particularly abuses against women and

children;

Whereas the former King of Afghanistan, Mohammed Zahir

Shah, ruled the country peacefully for 40 years, and after

years in exile retains his popularity and support; and

Whereas former King Mohammed Zahir Shah plans to convene an emergency ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’ to reestablish a stable

government, with no desire to regain power or reestablish

a monarchy, and the Department of State supports such

ongoing efforts: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the United States—

3 (1) supports democratic efforts undertaken in

4 Afghanistan that respect the human and political

5 rights of the people of all ethnic and religious groups

6 in that country, including the efforts to reestablish

7 a ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’ process that would lead to the peo8 ple of Afghanistan determining their own destiny

9 through a democratic process involving free and fair

10 elections; and

11 (2) supports the continuing efforts of former

12 King Mohammed Zahir Shah and other responsible

13 parties searching for peace to convene an emergency

14 ‘‘Loya Jirgah’’—
3

•SCON 142 IS

1 (A) to reestablish a representative govern2 ment in Afghanistan that respects the rights of

3 the people of all ethnic and religious groups, in4 cluding the right of the people to govern their

5 own affairs through inclusive institution build6 ing and a democratic process;

7 (B) to bring freedom, peace, and stability

8 to Afghanistan; and

9 (C) to end terrorist activities, drug produc10 tion, and human rights abuses in Afghanistan.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. Robbin E. ZACHARIE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-2342.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 30, 1987.

In re Zacharie, Robbin E.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

Granted. Trial judge ordered to comply with this Court’s August 25, 1986 order in No. 86-KH-1596 within 30 days.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-51,030-12

IN RE PAUL ANDREW PROPES, JR., AKA PAUL A. PORPUS, JR., Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. W366-81575-98-HC2 IN THE 366TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Collin County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Collin County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Collin County, or forward

a copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State

received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this

order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: February 1, 2023

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of By Design, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Gary S. Ohlbaum, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated: January 21, 2011











By:
/s/Gary S. OhlbaumGary S. Ohlbaum

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-8 No. 83068, dated August 16, 1994 and No. 333-36390 dated May 5,
2000), pertaining to The 1993 Incentive Plan of Fuel-Tech N.V. of our reports
dated March 8, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Fuel-Tech N.V., Fuel-Tech N.V. management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Fuel-Tech N.V.,
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Chicago, Illinois
March 8, 2006