Name:

Title:

Company:

Sign Date:

Name: Thomas F. Mattei

Title: Quality Assurance Manager / Techni

Company: Avogadro Environmental Corporatio

Sign Date: 6/29/2010

Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date

PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Final Test Report 

for

/ /

Based on information and belief formed 

after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the 

statements and information in this test 

report are true, accurate, and complete.

I have reviewed all testing details and 

results in this test report and hereby 

certify that the test report is authentic 

and accurate.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 1 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Facility Information:

PPL Montour, LLC.

18 McMichael Road

Washingtonville PA 17884

Contact: Ms. Kathleen Maylath

Phone: 570-437-1362

Fax: Of above person

Email: kjmaylath@pplweb.com

Testing Company:

Avogadro Environmental Corporation

1350 Sullivan Trail, Suite A

Easton PA 18040

Contact:Thomas Mattei

Phone: 610-559-8776 x 103

Fax: 610-559-8913

Email: tmattei@avogadro.net

Air Permit Number:

47-00001

Permitted Source ID/Name:

031 UNIT 1

Permitted Maximum Process Rate:

N/A

Max. Normal Operation Process Rate:

N/A

Target Process Test Rate

N/A

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or

 process flow diagram:

Located in Derry Township about one mile northeast of Washingtonville, Montour County, Pennsylvania, the 

Montour plant has two coal-fired, steam-electric generation units. 

PPL Montour Units 1 and 2 are Combustion Engineering, pulverized, bituminous coal fired boilers. Each boiler 

supplies steam to separate 800 Megawatt General Electric turbines. Exhaust gas from each unit passes through 

unique and optional Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Sodium BiSulfite (SBS) systems, before entering the 

Electrostatic Precipitators (ESPs). After passage through the ESPs, exhaust gas is introduced into a recently 

installed, wet limestone, Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD) system and finally exits through separate, unit specific 

fiberglass flues housed inside a single concrete shell. 

Unit 1 began commercial operation in 1972 and has a nominal generating capacity of 800 MW; Unit 2 came on line 

the following year with a nominal generating capacity of 800 MW.

Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information:

AFS #: 4209300005 FRS #: 110000492324

SCC / Description 10100202 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous 

Coal - Pulverized Coal: Dry Bottom (Bituminous Coal) 

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location

Round

Duct

Diam.

Distance from 

upstream dist.

Distance from

downstream dist.

Number of

Traverse Ports

Equiv. 

Diam

Min.Travers 

Points

Rect. Duct 

Length /Width

Stack Exit 360 0 0 0 2016 4296 4 12

Target

Parameter 

Test

Method

Number of

Test Runs

Test Run

Duration

Sample 

Location Points Comments

Stack Exit % H2O Method 1 - 4 3 72 0 runs range between 72 

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 2 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

and 240 minutes 

depending upon 

parameter being 

sampled

Hydrogen Fluoride Method 26A 3 72 0 The samples were 

collected in a 

combined train with 

HCN using NaOH

impingers only.

Method 26A & CTM033

The MDLs are 

determined by the 

analysis of at least 

seven replicate 

standards at a 

concentration near the 

expected MDL. To 

determine the MDL 

value, the standard 

deviation of the 

replicate analyses is 

calculated and that 

number is multiplied 

by the Student t factor 

that corresponds to the 

number of replicates 

analyzed. The MDL 

value should meet the 

criteria stated in the 

CFR Title 40, Part 136 

B.

If the MDL 

determined does not 

meet these criteria, a 

default MDL value 

will be used which is 

1/10 of the 

concentration of the 

standard used to 

produce the MDL 

value.

If the MDL 

determined does not 

meet these criteria, a 

default MDL value 

will be used which is 

1/10 of the 

concentration of the 

standard used to 

produce the MDL 

value.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 3 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Hydrogen Chloride Method 26A 3 72 0 The samples were 

collected in a 

combined train with 

HCN using NaOH

impingers only. 

Chlorine data for 

Method 26A analysis 

is not available from 

the laboratory.

Method 26A & CTM033

The MDLs are 

determined by the 

analysis of at least 

seven replicate 

standards at a 

concentration near the 

expected MDL. To 

determine the MDL 

value, the standard 

deviation of the 

replicate analyses is 

calculated and that 

number is multiplied 

by the Student t factor 

that corresponds to the 

number of replicates 

analyzed. The MDL 

value should meet the 

criteria stated in the 

CFR Title 40, Part 136 

B.

If the MDL 

determined does not 

meet these criteria, a 

default MDL value 

will be used which is 

1/10 of the 

concentration of the 

standard used to 

produce the MDL 

value.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 4 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 5 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 6 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 7 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 8 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 9 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 10 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 11 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 12 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 13 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 14 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Method 29 

For Method 29 the 

analyst takes the 

statistically 

determined MDL 

(Method Detection 

Limit) value and 

multiplies it by a 

“factor” in order to 

determine the RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit). This process is 

similar to the one 

employed in Method 

23 where the EDL is 

determined based on a 

constant factor of 2.5 

times the signal to 

noise ratio. 

For the ICP/MS this 

“factor” can vary. The 

factor is determined 

by the analyst at the 

bench and takes into 

account all relevant 

factors such as, final 

volumes, 

interferences, matrix 

issues, etc. The RDL 

(Reporting Detection 

Limit) reported is the 

lowest concentration 

that the lab feels can 

be reported within the 

99% confidence 

interval. For values 

below this RDL the 

uncertainty increases. 

Section 5.5.5.2.2.1 

bullet H refers to the 

ICP/MS procedure.

Stack Exit

Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 229 0 CO2 data for 

M5/OTM28 and M29 

runs raning between 

229 and 281 minutes

Stack Exit

O2 Method 3A O2 3 120 0 O2 data for M26A, 

CTM33 and gaseous 

runs raning between 

97 and 111 minutes

Stack Exit

Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 120 0 CO2 data for M26A, 

CTM33 and gaseous 

runs raning between 

97 and 111 minutes

Stack Exit

O2 Method 3A O2 3 229 0 O2 data for 

M5/OTM28 and M29 

runs raning between 

229 and 281 minutes

Stack Exit

Stack Exit Mercury Method 30B 3 120 0

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 15 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Total Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 16 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Filterable Particulate Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Pursuant to Method 5, 

no blank filter was 

analyzed or blank 

filter correction 

performed.

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 17 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Organic Condensible 

Particulate

Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value for each fraction 

was calculated by 

dividing the fraction 

blank amount by the 

total back half blank 

amount and 

multiplying that by the 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 18 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Inorganic (Aqueous) 

Condensible Part.

Method 5/OTM-28 3 240 0 Back half particulate 

matter (OTM-028) 

mass was calculated 

using the maximum 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. A correction 

value for each fraction 

was calculated by 

dividing the fraction 

blank amount by the 

total back half blank 

amount and 

multiplying that by the 

allowable blank 

correction value of 

0.002 g. 

Method OTM-028

A portion of reagent 

water that has been 

spiked with a known 

amount of material is 

extracted 3 times with 

Methylene Chloride. 

The solvent is 

evaporated to dryness. 

Detection Limits are 

calculated by using the 

standard deviation 

from these 10 replicate 

low level spikes. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit. The 

non-extractable 

portion is determined 

by the weight 

difference on a series 

of 10 vials. Detection 

Limits are calculated 

by using the standard 

deviation from these 

10 replicates. The 

standard deviation is 

multiplied by the 

appropriate Student T 

value to determine the 

statistically derived 

reporting limit.

Stack Exit

Sulfur Dioxide Method 6C 3 97 0 runs range from 97 to 

111 in duration

Stack Exit

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) Method 7E 3 97 0 runs range from 97 to 

111 minutes in 

duration

Stack Exit

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 19 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test 

methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation 

of request AND approval, including dates.

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 20 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-3 M26A-4 M26A-5

Test Date 3/18/2010 3/18/2010 3/18/2010

Run Start Time 7:10:00 AM 9:20:00 

AM

11:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 8:51:00 AM 10:58:00 

AM

1:21:00 PM

Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 35.486 35.939 35.274 35.566

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 12.89 15.32 12.91 13.707

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.27 12.52 12.93 12.573

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 12 11.8 11.867

Oxygen, % 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.333

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.29 123.00 124.13 123.140

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,580,558.5 1,589,710.0 1,578,581.0 1,582,949.83

3

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,989,522.5 2,009,880.0 2,012,000.6 2,003,801.03

3

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 106.3 107.0 105.8 106.367

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 21 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Run Time, minutes

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 22 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Location Stack Exit - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 23 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Emissions Summary

Location: Stack Exit - Method 26A

Compound: Hydrogen Chloride

Average

RunNumber M26A-3 M26A-4 M26A-5

Mass_mg 0.328 0.311 0.329 0.323

lb/mmBtuO2 3.09E-04 2.85E-04 3.11E-04 0.000

Compound: Hydrogen Fluoride

Average

RunNumber M26A-3 M26A-4 M26A-5

Mass_mg 0.328 0.311 0.329 0.323

lb/mmBtuO2 3.09E-04 2.85E-04 3.11E-04 0.000

Location: Stack Exit - Method 29

Compound: Antimony

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003

lb/mmBtuO2 6.42E-07 6.64E-07 6.40E-07 0.000

Compound: Arsenic

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003

lb/mmBtuO2 6.42E-07 6.64E-07 6.40E-07 0.000

Compound: Beryllium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00075 0.00075 0.00075 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 1.61E-07 1.66E-07 1.60E-07 0.000

Compound: Cadmium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00075 0.00098 0.0051 0.002

lb/mmBtuO2 1.61E-07 2.17E-07 1.09E-06 0.000

Compound: Chromium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.01372 0.00958 0.02685 0.017

lb/mmBtuO2 2.94E-06 2.12E-06 5.73E-06 0.000

Compound: Cobalt

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00022 0.00038 0.00101 0.001

lb/mmBtuO2 4.71E-08 8.41E-08 2.15E-07 0.000

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 24 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 75.5 62 84.2 73.900

lb/mmBtuO2 1.62E-02 1.37E-02 1.80E-02 0.016

Compound: Lead

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.00403 0.00257 0.00282 0.003

lb/mmBtuO2 8.63E-07 5.68E-07 6.02E-07 0.000

Compound: Manganese

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0051 0.0051 0.00426 0.005

lb/mmBtuO2 1.09E-06 1.13E-06 9.09E-07 0.000

Compound: Nickel

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.03376 0.02153 0.07163 0.042

lb/mmBtuO2 7.23E-06 4.76E-06 1.53E-05 0.000

Compound: Selenium

Average

RunNumber M29-1 M29-2 M29-3

Mass_mg 0.0436 0.0495 0.0655 0.053

lb/mmBtuO2 9.34E-06 1.09E-05 1.40E-05 0.000

Location: Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28

Compound: Filterable Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 19.5 28.5 19.6 22.533

lb/mmBtuO2 4.73E-03 7.04E-03 4.60E-03 0.005

Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 48.3 118.3 45.3 70.633

lb/mmBtuO2 1.17E-02 2.92E-02 1.06E-02 0.017

Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 3.3 4.3 3.8 3.800

lb/mmBtuO2 8.01E-04 1.06E-03 8.92E-04 0.001

Compound: Total Particulate

Average

RunNumber OTM28-1 OTM28-2 OTM28-3

Mass_mg 71.1 151.1 68.7 96.967

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 25 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Process Run Data

lb/mmBtuO2 1.72E-02 3.73E-02 1.61E-02 0.024

Location: Stack Exit - Method 6C

Compound: Sulfur Dioxide

Average

Run 3 4 5

lb/mmBtuO2 5.19E-01 4.54E-01 4.01E-01 0.458

ppm 2.06E+02 1.83E+02 1.59E+02 182.667

ppm@7%O2 2.12E+02 1.86E+02 1.64E+02 187.333

Location: Stack Exit - Method 7E

Compound: Nitrogen oxides (NOx)

Average

Run 3 4 5

lb/mmBtuO2 1.25E-01 1.19E-01 1.21E-01 0.122

ppm 6.93E+01 6.71E+01 6.69E+01 67.767

ppm@7%O2 7.14E+01 6.81E+01 6.89E+01 69.467

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 26 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Process Run Data

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

2 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

3 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

4 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

5 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

6 Coal Burned 1000 Tons/hr

1 Average Heat Input 5432 MMBtu/hr

2 Average Heat Input 5145 MMBtu/hr

3 Average Heat Input 5048 MMBtu/hr

4 Average Heat Input 5356 MMBtu/hr

5 Average Heat Input 5478 MMBtu/hr

6 Average Heat Input 5099 MMBtu/hr

1 Steam Output 4944 1000 lb steam/hr

2 Steam Output 4825 1000 lb steam/hr

3 Steam Output 4723 1000 lb steam/hr

4 Steam Output 4871 1000 lb steam/hr

5 Steam Output 5025 1000 lb steam/hr

6 Steam Output 4873 1000 lb steam/hr

1 Flue Gas Flow Rate 92655

4 Flue Gas Flow Rate 95410

5 Flue Gas Flow Rate 92978

6 Flue Gas Flow Rate 87855

1 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 1.2 in H20

4 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 1.2 in H20

5 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 1.2 in H20

6 Pressure Drop Across FGD (if applicable) 1.2 in H20

1 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.6 pH

4 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH

5 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH

6 FGD Scrubber Liquor pH 5.4 pH

1 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 220 gal/min

4 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 214 gal/min

5 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 235 gal/min

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 27 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

6 FGD Scrubber Liquor Flow Rate 170 gal/min

1 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.2 %

4 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.3 %

5 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.2 %

6 Flue Gas Oxygen Content 4.3 %

1 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.8 %

4 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.7 %

5 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.8 %

6 Flue Gas Carbon Dioxide Content 10.7 %

1 Flue Gas Moisture Content %

4 Flue Gas Moisture Content %

5 Flue Gas Moisture Content %

6 Flue Gas Moisture Content %

1 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 123 Deg F

4 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 120 Deg F

5 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 121 Deg F

6 Flue Gas Sampling Point Temperature 122 Deg F

1 Flue Gas Pressure 0.96 atm

4 Flue Gas Pressure 0.95 atm

5 Flue Gas Pressure 0.95 atm

6 Flue Gas Pressure 0.95 atm

1 Standard Pressure 1 atm

4 Standard Pressure 1 atm

5 Standard Pressure 1 atm

6 Standard Pressure 1 atm

1 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F

4 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F

5 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F

6 Standard Temperature 68 Deg F

1 Unit Gross Electrical Output 704 Mwe

4 Unit Gross Electrical Output 673 Mwe

5 Unit Gross Electrical Output 699 Mwe

6 Unit Gross Electrical Output 692 Mwe

1 Unit Net Electric Generation 671 MWh

4 Unit Net Electric Generation 641 MWh

5 Unit Net Electric Generation 666 MWh

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 28 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data

6 Unit Net Electric Generation 658 MWh

1 SCR Ammonia Flow 567 pph

4 SCR Ammonia Flow 545 pph

5 SCR Ammonia Flow 555 pph

6 SCR Ammonia Flow 559 pph

1 SBS Dilute Flow Rate 6 gpm

4 SBS Dilute Flow Rate 6 gpm

5 SBS Dilute Flow Rate 6 gpm

6 SBS Dilute Flow Rate 6 gpm

1 ESP Status i/s or o/s

4 ESP Status i/s or o/s

5 ESP Status i/s or o/s

6 ESP Status i/s or o/s

1 Flue Oil Firing Rate 88 gal/hr

4 Flue Oil Firing Rate 38 gal/hr

5 Flue Oil Firing Rate 38 gal/hr

6 Flue Oil Firing Rate 38 gal/hr

Run Name Value UOM Comments

Target

Value

1 SCR (SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION) 0

1 SODIUM BISULFITE (SBS) SYSTEM 0

1 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR 0

1 WETL LIMESTONE FLUE GAS 

DESULFURIZATION SYSTEM

0

Run Name Value UOM Comments

1 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15148 Btu/lb

2 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15152 Btu/lb

3 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15117 Btu/lb

4 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15207 Btu/lb

5 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15197 Btu/lb

6 Fuel Higher Heating Value 15224 Btu/lb

1 Fuel Moisture 1.62 %

2 Fuel Moisture 1.53 %

3 Fuel Moisture 1.51 %

4 Fuel Moisture 1.16 %

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 29 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

5 Fuel Moisture 1.17 %

6 Fuel Moisture 1.17 %

1 Fuel Mercury Content 69.03 ppb

2 Fuel Mercury Content 73.19 ppb

3 Fuel Mercury Content 67.74 ppb

1 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.05 ppm

2 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.05 ppm

3 Fuel Cadmium Content 0.05 ppm

1 Fuel Nickel Content 4.66 ppm

2 Fuel Nickel Content 5.22 ppm

3 Fuel Nickel Content 6.97 ppm

1 Fuel Arsenic Content 3.28 ppm

2 Fuel Arsenic Content 2.58 ppm

3 Fuel Arsenic Content 2.47 ppm

1 Fuel Chromium Content 15.1 ppm

2 Fuel Chromium Content 14.3 ppm

3 Fuel Chromium Content 16 ppm

1 Fuel Beryllium Content 0.04 ppm

2 Fuel Beryllium Content 0.04 ppm

3 Fuel Beryllium Content 0.04 ppm

1 Fuel Lead Content 4.21 ppm

2 Fuel Lead Content 4.76 ppm

3 Fuel Lead Content 4.79 ppm

1 Fuel Manganese Content 14.4 ppm

2 Fuel Manganese Content 13.8 ppm

3 Fuel Manganese Content 14.8 ppm

1 Scrubber Slurry 2E+05 mg/L

2 Scrubber Slurry 2E+05 mg/L

3 Scrubber Slurry 2E+05 mg/L

1 Fuel Cobalt Content 0.25 ppm

2 Fuel Cobalt Content 0.25 ppm

3 Fuel Cobalt Content 0.25 ppm

1 Fuel Antimony Content 4.96 ppm

2 Fuel Antimony Content 4.98 ppm

3 Fuel Antimony Content 4.94 ppm

1 Fuel Ash, as received 8.74 %

2 Fuel Ash, as received 8.9 %

3 Fuel Ash, as received 8.66 %

4 Fuel Ash, as received 7.56 %

5 Fuel Ash, as received 7.69 %

6 Fuel Ash, as received 7.79 %

1 Fuel Ash, dry basis 8.88 %

2 Fuel Ash, dry basis 9.03 %

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 30 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

3 Fuel Ash, dry basis 8.79 %

4 Fuel Ash, dry basis 7.65 %

5 Fuel Ash, dry basis 7.78 %

6 Fuel Ash, dry basis 7.88 %

1 Fuel Volatile, as received 38.71 %

2 Fuel Volatile, as received 38.47 %

3 Fuel Volatile, as received 38.86 %

4 Fuel Volatile, as received 39 %

5 Fuel Volatile, as received 38.75 %

6 Fuel Volatile, as received 37.76 %

1 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 39.34 %

2 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 39.06 %

3 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 39.45 %

4 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 39.45 %

5 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 39.21 %

6 Fuel Volatile, dry basis 38.2 %

1 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.425 %

2 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.43 %

3 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.366 %

4 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.694 %

5 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.515 %

6 Fuel Sulfur, as received 2.105 %

1 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.465 %

2 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.468 %

3 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.402 %

4 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.726 %

5 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.545 %

6 Fuel Sulfur, dry basis 2.13 %

1 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.12 %

2 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.12 %

3 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.12 %

4 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.1 %

5 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.11 %

6 Fuel Chlorine, as received 0.11 %

1 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.12 %

2 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.12 %

3 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.12 %

4 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.1 %

5 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.11 %

6 Fuel Chlorine, dry basis 0.11 %

4 Fuel Fluorine, as received 46 ppm

5 Fuel Fluorine, as received 45 ppm

6 Fuel Fluorine, as received 34 ppm

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 31 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

4 Fuel Fluorine, dry basis 46 ppm

5 Fuel Fluorine, dry basis 45 ppm

6 Fuel Fluorine, dry basis 34 ppm

1 Fuel Selenium Content 0.88 ppm

2 Fuel Selenium Content 0.59 ppm

3 Fuel Selenium Content 0.76 ppm

1 Carbon, as received 74.54 %

2 Carbon, as received 74.38 %

3 Carbon, as received 74.9 %

4 Carbon, as received 75.9 %

5 Carbon, as received 76.09 %

6 Carbon, as received 76.32 %

1 Carbon, dry basis 75.48 %

2 Carbon, dry basis 75.23 %

3 Carbon, dry basis 75.77 %

4 Carbon, dry basis 76.64 %

5 Carbon, dry basis 76.76 %

6 Carbon, dry basis 77.01 %

1 Hydrogen, as received 4.87 %

2 Hydrogen, as received 4.82 %

3 Hydrogen, as received 4.8 %

4 Hydrogen, as received 4.9 %

5 Hydrogen, as received 4.86 %

6 Hydrogen, as received 4.88 %

1 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.93 %

2 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.88 %

3 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.86 %

4 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.95 %

5 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.91 %

6 Hydrogen, dry basis 4.92 %

1 Nitrogen, as received 1.98 %

2 Nitrogen, as received 1.9 %

3 Nitrogen, as received 1.82 %

4 Nitrogen, as received 1.78 %

5 Nitrogen, as received 1.85 %

6 Nitrogen, as received 1.8 %

1 Nitrogen, dry basis 2 %

2 Nitrogen, dry basis 1.92 %

3 Nitrogen, dry basis 1.84 %

4 Nitrogen, dry basis 1.8 %

5 Nitrogen, dry basis 1.87 %

6 Nitrogen, dry basis 1.82 %

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 32 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail

Location Stack Exit - Method 26A

Average

Run Number M26A-3 M26A-4 M26A-5

Test Date 3/18/2010 3/18/2010 3/18/2010

Run Start Time 7:10:00 AM 9:20:00 AM 11:30:00 AM

Run Finish Time 8:51:00 AM 10:58:00 AM 1:21:00 PM

Net Traversing Points 24 24 24

Net Run Time, minutes 72 72 72

Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.195 0.195 0.195 0.195

Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.830

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1 1 1 1.000

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.93 29.92 29.87 29.907

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 0.81 0.84 0.82 0.823

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 36.194 36.921 36.673 36.596

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 79.79 83.54 89.13 84.153

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 35.486 35.939 35.274 35.566

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 111.6 138.1 111.1 120.267

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 5.25 6.50 5.23 5.660

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 12.89 15.32 12.91 13.707

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 12.27 12.52 12.93 12.573

Dry Mole Fraction 0.8773 0.8748 0.8709 0.874

Carbon Dioxide, % 11.8 12 11.8 11.867

Oxygen, % 7.4 7.2 7.4 7.333

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.8 80.8 80.8 80.800

Fuel Factor 1.14 1.14 1.14

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.18 30.21 30.18 30.190

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 28.80 29.19 28.61 28.867

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -0.72 -0.72 -0.72 -0.720

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.88 29.87 29.82 29.857

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 122.29 123.00 124.13 123.140

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 0.6458260852

2012

0.667198117

949354

0.652771061

310118

0.655

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 46.91 47.39 47.44 47.247

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 706.858 706.858 706.858 706.858

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,580,558.5 1,589,710.0 1,578,581.0 1,582,949.8

33

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 1,989,522.5 2,009,880.0 2,012,000.6 2,003,801.0

33

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 106.3 107.0 105.8 106.367

Percent Excess Air, % 53.1 51.0 53.1 52.400

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000

Round Duct Diameter, inches 360 360 360

Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0

Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0

Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000

Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 33 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 29

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 34 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 5/OTM-28

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Net Traversing Points

Net Run Time, minutes

Nozzle Diameter, inches

Pitot Tube Coefficient

Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor

Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet

Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F

Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf

Total Moisture Liquid collected, g

Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet

Moisture Content of Stack Gas, %

Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, %

Dry Mole Fraction

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole

Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole

Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O

Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury

Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F

Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O

Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second

Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm

Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, %

Percent Excess Air, %

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Round Duct Diameter, inches

Rectangular Duct Width, inches

Rectangular Duct Length, inches

Fw

Fc

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 35 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 6C

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 36 of 37
PPL Generation, LLC - Montour Station Unit 1

Location Stack Exit - Method 7E

Average

Run Number

Test Date

Run Start Time

Run Finish Time

Carbon Dioxide, %

Oxygen, %

Fuel Factor

Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm

F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2

Moisture, %

Analyzer Make

Analyzer Model

Analyzer Serial Number

Operating Range

Operating Units

No. Readings/Avg.

Calibration Set

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Pre High Cylinder ID

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Pre High Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder ID

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post Zero Cylinder Drift

Calibration Post High Cylinder ID

Calibration Post High Cylinder Instrument Response

Calibration Post High Cylinder Bias

Calibration Post High Cylinder Drift

Cavg

Cavg Units

Cgas

Cgas Units

Fuel Type

Fw

Fc

Cgasw

Cgasw Units

Tuesday, February 01, 2011 Page 37 of 37