alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | Employer      and Employee agree that Employee’s annual base salary increase from      $633,000 to $667,000 shall go into effect on November 10, 2009, rather      than on May 10, 2009 as provided in Section 3 of the      Agreement.  Employee’s base salary increase from $667,000 to      $700,000 will go into effect as provided in the Agreement, on May 10,      2010.  Employee’s target bonus of 75% applicable to the third      year of the Agreement shall remainunchanged. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | In      the event of the termination of employment of Employee, the Employer      agrees that the payments and benefits to which Employee is entitled under      the Agreement shall be calculated for all purposes as if Employee had not      waived for six months his contractually guaranteed salary      increase. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Except      as set forth herein, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force      and effect. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 110 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 110

 Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth anniversary of the 
reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former Soviet 
                                 Union.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2000

    Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Helms, Mr. Robb, and Mr. Abraham) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth anniversary of the 
reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former Soviet 
                                 Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible incorporation of the 
        Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the former Soviet 
        Union;
Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full 
        sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the 
        disintegration of the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy, passed legislation 
        on human and minority rights that conform to European and international 
        norms, ensured the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and 
        consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free 
        and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and 
        the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political and economic 
        reforms, has made, and continues to make, a significant contribution 
        toward the maintenance of international peace and stability by, among 
        other actions, its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in 
        Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby--
            (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the tenth 
        anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence and the 
        role it played in the disintegration of the former Soviet 
        Union; and
            (2) commends Latvia for its success in implementing 
        political and economic reforms, which may further speed the 
        process of that country's integration into European and Western 
        institutions.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Todd Albiston, Vice President and Director of Westcott Products Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report ("Annual Report") on Form 10-KSB of Westcott Products Corporation. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report; 

 

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Annual Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

 

c) presented in this Annual Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function); 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and 

 

6. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Annual Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

 

| *Date:*** | *12/27/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Todd Albiston***                           |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|------------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Todd Albiston, Vice President and Director*** |
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 110

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth anniversary of the

reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former Soviet Union.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 4, 2000

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. HELMS, Mr. ROBB, and Mr. ABRAHAM) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from

the rule of the former Soviet Union.

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;

Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy,

passed legislation on human and minority rights that

conform to European and international norms, ensured

the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and
2

•SCON 110 IS

consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and the North Atlantic

Treaty Organization; and

Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress hereby—

3 (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the

4 tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its inde5 pendence and the role it played in the disintegration

6 of the former Soviet Union; and

7 (2) commends Latvia for its success in imple8 menting political and economic reforms, which may

9 further speed the process of that country’s integra10 tion into European and Western institutions.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6826** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MIRWAISS AMINZADA , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 00130

- CMH

- 10; 1:15

- cv - 00825

- CMH )

Submitted : November 17 , 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Mirwaiss Aminzada, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Elyse Marziani, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Mirwaiss Aminzada seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) ( 2012)
. A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demons trating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district cou rt denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have inde pendently reviewed the record and conclude that Aminzada has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented3 in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1792 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1792

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the requirements 
  for windows, doors, and skylights to be eligible for the credit for 
                      nonbusiness energy property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 15, 2009

Mr. Rockefeller (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the requirements 
  for windows, doors, and skylights to be eligible for the credit for 
                      nonbusiness energy property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF STANDARDS FOR WINDOWS, DOORS, AND SKYLIGHTS 
              WITH RESPECT TO THE CREDIT FOR NONBUSINESS ENERGY 
              PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 25C(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``is equal to'' and all 
that follows and inserting ``meets the criteria for such components 
established by the 2010 Energy Star Program Requirements for 
Residential Windows, Doors, and Skylights, Version 5.0 (or any 
subsequent version of such requirements which is in effect after 
January 4, 2010).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



RADIANT SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this amended annual
report of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Heyman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|             |  |     |  |                                       
|------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|May 16, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John H. Heyman                    
|             |  |     |  | John H. Heyman Chief Executive
Officer
### Need to return call by / at/betwe en and

. Signature:

___________________________ Project No.: 0172.09.029.0 4 1 DISTRIBUTION

Page _ 1 _ of

__ 1

_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call Date: 10/13/2011 Time: 10:30 AM

Company Name: Georgia Power Co (McManus Pow er Plant) Contact Name: W.R. Evans

Phone No.: 404

- 506

- 7031

Name: Elizabeth Sabol , Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : McManus Power Plant Wet Oil Ash



## TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I contacted Mr. Evans with Georgia Power, Co. to discuss the fly ash handling systems for oil

- fired Units 1 and

2 at the McManus Power Plant. Mr. Evans stated that for the Steam Electric Survey , the plant reported zero for

the ash amounts because the oil units did not operate in 2009. He mentioned that M cManus is an older plant that

is continually being evaluated for retirement, and it is not operating at the moment.

Mr. Evans also explained that they do not collect fly and bottom ash separately. He explained that there is no fly

ash production; however , there is a bottom ash residue on the interior walls of the boiler and the bottom

hoppers. During outages, the plant shovels the ash out and transports it in drums or wheel barrels to two above

ground, concrete ponds. Mr. Evans stated that if the plant we re in full operation, they would perform this

procedure once a year and produce several 55 gallon drums of the bottom ash residue. He also stated that the

plant has the option of doing a "full clean" if operating at full load in which case the bottom ash w ould be

washed with a hose, drained to the sumps, and pumped to the above ground, concrete ponds.

Only the ash water and low volume wastes from the floor sumps are sent to the two above ground, concrete

ponds. These ponds also collect rainfall. The overf low from these ponds gravity drains to an old ash pond (the

plant previously burned coal). The concrete ponds do not directly discharge to surface water. Overflow from the

old ash pond gravity drains to the surrounding marshes/surface water. He stated that the ash in the basins would

likely not be removed until the plant shut down. Metal cleaning wastes are not commingled with this waste

stream, they are handled separately and trucked off site.
50241.

#### BEST BUY HOSIERY OF GEORGIA, INC. v. WILLIAM MILLER ASSOCIATES, INC.

Argued February 3, 1975

Decided April 7, 1975.

*Byrd, Groover & Buford, Garland T. Byrd, Leonard Nave,*for appellant.

*Telford, Stewart & Stephens, William M. House,*for appellee.

Bell, Chief Judge.

In order to determine whether there is merit in any of the enumeration of errors, a consideration of the evidence is necessary. The record does not contain a transcript. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. *Lankford v. Lankford,*225 Ga. 147 (166 SE2d 354); *Wright v. Cooper,*123 Ga. App. 204 (180 SE2d 261).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification by the Chief Executive Officer


of


Boardwalk GP, LLC


pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief executive officer of Boardwalk GP, LLC, hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, (the "Report") of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, (the “Partnership”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





July 31, 2009


/s/ Rolf A. Gafvert


Rolf A. Gafvert


President, Chief Executive Officer and Director


(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors. 

Verity, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-119189, 333-113776, 333-99755, 333-91138, 333-68586, 333-68096, 333-60676, 333-51642, 333-89701, 333-66913, 333-44877, 333-43905, 333-36527, 333-26869, 333-24753 and 333-2600) on Form S-8 of Verity, Inc. of ourreports dated August 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Verity, Inc. as of May 31, 2005 and May 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, cash flows, andcomprehensive income for each of the years in the two-year period ended May 31, 2005, and related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2005, andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 31, 2005, which reports appear elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K of Verity, Inc. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

August 8, 2005
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|               |   |   |                          |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Date: May 15, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Snyder           |
|               |   |   |                               |
|               |   |   | Jonathan Snyder               |
|               |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|               |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
#### S. R. MORGAN, Appellant, v. Ed BLIEDEN, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

No. 11567.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 20, 1939.

Coulter & Coulter, and C. E. Garner, all of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

D. D. Panich, of Little Rock, Ark., and Arthur L. Adams, of Jonesboro, Ark., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed with costs, pursuant to stipulation.
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                        REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Presstek, Inc.
Hudson, New Hampshire

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective
Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-80466, 33-61215, 33-30337,
333-76905 and 333-97897) and on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-2299 and 33-48342) of
Presstek, Inc., and in the Prospectuses constituting part of such Registration
Statements, of our report dated March 16, 2005, relating to the financial
statements, the effectiveness of Presstek's internal control over financial
reporting, and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2005