alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.2)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PeopleSupport, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Caroline RookChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 37
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 12924-002 and 14077-000]

                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Mississippi River, in Warren County, Mississippi, and Tensas and Madison Parishes, Louisiana. The applications were filed by FFP Project 33, LLC for Project No. 12924-002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14077-000.                

                    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-702 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - -

NO. 20-0816 IN THE INTEREST OF M.H. AND T.H., CHILDREN § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.

December 18, 2020 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

 I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, C.H., pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 27th day of January, 2021.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
50537.

#### G & B CONTRACTORS, INC. v. CORONET DEVELOPERS, INC. et al.

Bell, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a subcontractor, brought a suit to foreclose its lien for labor and materials against the general contractor and the owner of the real estate in the State Court of Cobb County within twelve months from the time the debt became due, as required by Code Ann. § 67-2002 (3). This suit was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and venue. Plaintiff later, but more than twelve months from the time the debt was due but within six months after the dismissal of the prior suit, renewed the foreclosure suit in the Fulton Superior Court and also sought a general judgment against the defendant property owner for the reasonable value of the labor and materials used in the improvement in the defendant’s property. The trial court dismissed the complaint. *Held:*

1. *Chamblee Lumber Co. v. Crichton,*136 Ga. 391 (71 SE 673) holds that the renewal statute, Code Ann. § 3-808, has no application to a suit to foreclose the lien of a materialman. The decision controls here. Since foreclosure was commenced more than twelve months after the date the debt became due, plaintiff was barred from foreclosing its lien. The trial court correctly dismissed Count 1 of the complaint.

2. In Count 2, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant accepted the work and improvements placed on its real estate by the plaintiff and, therefore, plaintiff is entitled to recover the reasonable value of the services performed. It is admitted by plaintiff that there is no privity of contract between itself and the defendant owner. "Where a materialman seeks to foreclose his lien against real estate which has been improved with material furnished by him to a contractor for such purpose, he can not recover a general verdict and judgment against the owner of the land for the value of the material furnished,... for the simple reason that he is no party to the contract for the purchase of the material.” *Gignilliat v. West Lumber Co.,*80 Ga. App. 652 (56 SE2d 841). The case of *Conway v. Housing Authority,*102 Ga. App. 333 (116 SE2d 331), is distinguishable from this in *917that in *Conway*the owner procured a subcontractor engaged in performing work for the general contractor to perform additional work. This factor is not present here. Accordingly, the trial court properly dismissed Count 2 of the complaint.

Submitted May 5, 1975

Decided May 29, 1975.

*Downey, Cleveland & Moore, Douglas R. Haynie,*for appellant.

*Richard A. Feldman,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
#### Talmadge F. STUBBLEFIELD v. JESCO, INC., et al.

No. 57607.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 20, 1988.

William S. Lawson, Tupelo, Thomas J. Lowe, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

William M. Beasley, Mitchell, Voge & Corban, Tupelo, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; Frank A. Russell, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and SULLIVAN and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.3

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel
Group (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2007               /s/ Jiangping Jiang
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jiangping Jiang,
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FRANKLIN SILVERIO,

 Appellant,

v.

TIFFANY SILVERIO,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-20-00038-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

of Bell County, Texas

(TC# 84,349)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant and his sureties, if any, see TEX. R. APP. P. 43.5, on the judgment and all 

costs in this Court for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Palafox, J., Alley, J., and Dominguez, Judge

Dominguez, Judge, sitting by assignment
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Bufkin Partners, Ltd. d/b/a Longview 

Truck Center, Bufkin Management, LLC, 

and Bufkin Truck Service, LLC

No. 06-22-00050-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

van Cleef participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the relator to 

dismiss the mandamus petition should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding.

RENDERED AUGUST 31, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing by Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, John S. Kovach, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(i)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and





(ii)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  August
      6, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/
      JOHN S. KOVACHJohn
      S. KovachChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial
Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2293 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Boltom H2003, H2004, 

H2100, H3100, H311. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Boltom 

H2003, H2004, H2100, H3100, H311. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BOLTOM H2003, H2004, H2100, H3100, H311. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.95 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Boltom H2003, H2004, H2100, H3100, H311) is amend7 ed by striking the date in the effective column period and 

8 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2293 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I, Morton A. Plawner, Chief Financial Officer of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

|/s/ Morton A. Plawner  
|-----------------------
|Morton A. Plawner      
|Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 9, 2008      

---
Exhibit 32.1



|             |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------------ |  | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.1 |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Date:
May 8, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ MARK P. MAYS       
|Name:  |  | Mark P. Mays           
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will
be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Kevin L. BARBER v. Hon. Edwin A. LOMBARD, Clerk of Court, Orleans Parish.

No. 87-KH-0734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Barber, Kevin L.; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 302-379; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-7373.

Denied. No particularized need shown.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sunrise Technologies International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-73211) of our
reports dated February 19, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statements schedule of Sunrise Technologies
International, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, which reports are included in this Form 10-K.


                                                 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California
March 30, 1999
#### Julius GRANGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-856.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

Aug. 31, 1987.

Preston N. Aucoin, Ville Platte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gold, Simon, Weems, Bruser, Sharp, Sues & Rundell, Raymond L. Brown, Jr., Alexandria, for defendant-appellee Allstate Ins.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes & Munstuman, De Witt T. Methvin, Alexandria, for mover, defendant-appellee State Farm.

Harold Charlies, Lawrence K. Ortego, ■ Dorothy J. Kyle, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee Champion Ins.

Before DOUCET, YELVERTON, and KNOLL, JJ.

MOTION TO DISMISS

DOUCET, Judge.

The defendants-appellees move to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff-appellant, Julius J. Granger, on the grounds that the appellant has appealed from the denial of a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for additur or a new trial, which are non-appealable interlocutory judgments.

A final judgment was signed in the instant case on April 29,1987. Plaintiff then moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for additur, or in the alternative, for a new trial. The trial judge signed a judgment rejecting plaintiffs demands on June 29, 1987.

Plaintiff’s motion for devolutive appeal which was filed in the trial court states that plaintiff appeals the judgment of June 29, 1987. This judgment denied plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or an additur, or in the alternative, a new trial. Plaintiff repeated this statement in his response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. In the response, plaintiff states, “The judgment appealed from denied his motion for 1) judgment NOV, 2) an additur, and 3) for a new trial.”

The judgments which can be appealed are given in La. Code of Civ.Proc. Art. 2083. Plaintiff admits he did not appeal the final judgment which was rendered on April 29, 1987, nor did he appeal the amended final judgment of June 9, 1987. Instead, he appealed an interlocutory judgment. This court cannot maintain this appeal. See *Norbert v. Norbert,*419 So.2d *5031247 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1982). No irreparable injury has been shown to result from the June 29, 1987, judgment. Therefore, the motion to dismiss must be granted. Costs in this court are assessed to plaintiff-appellant.

MOTION GRANTED AND APPEAL DISMISSED.
<PAGE>   1
                                  Exhibit 24(a)


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                 AND GEOLOGISTS


We hereby consent to the references to our firm and our report and to the use of
our report in the Annual Report of Chieftain International, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.



                                    NETHERLAND, SEWELL AND ASSOCIATES INC.




                                    By:  /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                        ------------------------------------
                                           Frederic D. Sewell
                                           President