alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert J. Holtz,
Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                                ZEROS & ONES, INC.

                                                /s/Robert J. Holtz
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert J. Holtz, Chief Financial
                                                Officer, and Chairman of the
                                                Board

Dated: April 14, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 67 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 200th anniversary of the establishment of the seat of government in 
        the District of Columbia will be observed in the year 2000;
Whereas November 17, 2000, will mark the bicentennial of the occupation of the 
        United States Capitol by the Senate and the House of Representatives; 
        and
Whereas the story of the design and construction of the United States Capitol 
        deserves wider attention: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. PRINTING OF ``THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL: A CHRONICLE OF 
              CONSTRUCTION, DESIGN, AND POLITICS''.

    (a) In General.--There shall be printed as a Senate document the 
book entitled ``The United States Capitol: A Chronicle of Construction, 
Design, and Politics'', prepared by the Architect of the Capitol.
    (b) Specifications.--The Senate document described in subsection 
(a) shall include illustrations and shall be in the style, form, 
manner, and binding as directed by the Joint Committee on Printing 
after consultation with the Secretary of the Senate.
    (c) Number of Copies.--In addition to the usual number of copies, 
there shall be printed with suitable binding the lesser of--
            (1) 6,500 copies for the use of the Senate, the House of 
        Representatives, and the Architect of the Capitol, to be 
        allocated as determined by the Secretary of the Senate; or
            (2) a number of copies that does not have a total 
        production and printing cost of more than $143,000.

            Passed the Senate November 2, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 67

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 To authorize the printing of ``The United States Capitol: A Chronicle 
                of Construction, Design, and Politics''.
```
#### STATE ex rel. Jerome D. WALTER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 89-KH-1307.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Walter, Jerome D.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA88 1033; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 4-86-424.

Prior report: La.App., 542 So.2d 586.

Denied. Relator has failed to establish sufficient justification for his failure to file timely his petition seeking review of the Court of Appeal’s judgment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SCOTSMAN
INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND SCOTSMAN
INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          15,808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,960
<INVENTORY>                                     52,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               131,342
<PP&E>                                          46,373
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,514
<BONDS>                                         74,719
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              915
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   275,943
<SALES>                                        324,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               324,291
<CGS>                                          236,402
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  236,402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 28,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,720
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
        

</TABLE>
Product Proposed Rule 

Transition Date Final Rule Transition Date*

HFC-125 January 2016 January 2016

HFC-227ea and blends January 2016 1 year from date of publication

HFC-134a January 2016 1 year from date of publication/ 

January 1, 2018

HFC-134a in New Light-Duty Systems MY 2021 MY 2021***

HCFC & HFC Containing Blends in New Light-Duty Systems MY 2017 MY 2017

Retrofitted Supermarket Systems January 2016 1 year from date of publication

New Supermarket Systems January 2016 January 2017

Retrofitted Remote Condensing Units January 2016 1 year from date of publication

New Remote Condensing Units January 2016 January 2018

Retrofitted Vending Machines January 2016 1 year from date of publication

New Vending Machines January 2016 January 2019

Retrofitted Stand-Alone Retail Food Refrig. Equipment January 2016 1 year from date of publication

New Stand-Alone Small Medium-Temperature Units, Large Medium

Temperature Units, and Low-Temperature Units January 2016 January 2019 / January 2020

Rigid Polyurethane Appliance Foam January 2017 January 2020

Rigid Polyurethane Commercial Refrigeration and Sandwich Panels January 2017 January 2020

Rigid Polyurethane Slabstock and Other January 2017 January 2019

Rigid Polyurethane and Polyisocyanurate Laminated Boardstock January 2017 January 2017

Flexible Polyurethane January 2017 January 2017

Integral Skin Polyurethane January 2017 January 2017

Polystyrene Extruded Sheet January 2017 January 2017

Polystyrene Extruded Boardstock and Billet (XPS) January 2017 January 2021

Polyolefin January 2017 January 2020

Phenolic Insulation Board and Bunstock January 2017 January 2017

Polyurethane Marine Flotation Foam January 2017 January 2020

Rigid Polyurethane Spray Foam January 2017 No status change finalized

Applicability of Status Change to Closed Cell Foams Not finalized

* Refer to Final Rule for Specific end-uses and dates

****narrowed use limits apply until January 1, 2022 for military and space uses

Foams 

SNAP RULE - EO_12866 SNAP Status Change 2060-AS18 FRM 20150327

Based on Draft Submitted to OMB June 24, 2015

Aerosols** 

** certain technical and medical uses remain acceptable

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning -- Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning

*** narrowed use limits apply for export to countries without servicing infrastructure through MY 2025

Refrigeration and Air Conditioning -- Retail Food Refrigeration and Vending Machines
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00697-CR

The State of Texas, Appellant

v.

Adam Gomez, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 99-5564-1, HONORABLE KEVIN HENDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

The State seeks to appeal an order granting appellee Adam Gomez’s motion to

suppress evidence. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp. 2000). The

clerk’s record reflects that the motion to suppress was granted in open court on September 18,

2000. The written order was signed on October 2, 2000. The State’s notice of appeal was filed

on October 20, 2000.

“The prosecuting attorney may not make an appeal under Subsection (a) or (b) of

this article later than the 15th day after the date on which the order, ruling, or sentence to be

appealed is entered by the court.” Id. art. 44.01(d). “[T]he term ‘entered by the court’ [in article

44.01(d)] encompasses the signing of an order by the trial judge. ” State v. Rosenbaum, 818

S.W.2d 398, 402 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The fifteenth day after the order in this cause was

signed by the trial court was October 17, 2000. The State’s substantive right to appeal expired
2

after that date. State v. Demaret, 764 S.W.2d 857, 858 (Tex. App.—Austin 1989, no pet.); see

also State v. Muller, 829 S.W.2d 805, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992).

The State did not perfect appeal before its right to appeal expired. Under the

circumstances, we must dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

Before Justices Jones, Kidd and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed:

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Glenn J. Heiar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: March 12, 2004                             By: /s/ Glenn J. Heiar
                                                    ----------------------------

                                                 Name: Glenn J. Heiar
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0168

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JAMES R. LOWRANCE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel of 

record, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant and Appellant in 

this matter shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of 

the date of this Order. The response must be served upon all counsel of 

record, including the Attorney General, the County Attorney, and the 

Appellate Defender Division’s Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court give 

notice of this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to the Defendant

and Appellant at his last known address.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 13 2021

04/13/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0168
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 10-1624

LAUNEIL SANDERS, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Administrator 

Lisa Jackson; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL; ABITIBI BOWATER CORPORATION; 

INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. R. Bryan Harwell, District 

Judge. (7:10-cv-00968-RBH) 

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: September 30, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Launeil Sanders, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Certiorari dismissed, January 10, 2011
2

PER CURIAM:

Launeil Sanders appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his complain without prejudice. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Sanders v. United States, No. 7:10-cv-00968-RBH (D.S.C. June 1, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Scrap China Corporation and
subsidiaries, (the “Company”) on 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul Roszel
President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








February
      4, 2010
            /s/
      Paul RoszelPaul
      RoszelPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
   22.1





SUBSIDIARIES OF
   CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC.





Cabletron Systems de
   Argentina S.A. (Argentina)


Cabletron Systems
   Pty. Limited (Australia)


Cabletron Systems do
   Brasil Representacoes Ltda. (Brazil)


Cabletron Systems of
   Canada Limited (Canada)


Cabletron Systems
   Chile (Chile)


Cabletron Systems de
   Colombia Ltda. (Colombia)


Cabletron Systems
   Inc.Organizaoni Slozka (Czech Republic)


Cabletron Systems
   Acquisition, Inc. (Delaware)


Cabletron Systems
   Government Sales, Inc. (Delaware)


Cabletron Insurance
   Company (Vermont)


Cabletron Systems
   Sales & Service, Inc. (Delaware)


Cabletron Systems,
   Inc. of USA (China)


Cabletron Systems
   Ltd. (England)


Cabletron Systems
   S.A. (France)


Cabletron Systems,
   GmbH (Germany)


Cabletron Systems
   Limited (Bermuda)


Cabletron Systems
   (Distribution) Limited (Ireland)


Cabletron Systems
   Inc. (Hong Kong)


Cabletron Systems
   S.r.l. (Italy)


Cabletron Systems,
   K.K. (Japan)


Cabletron Systems,
   Pte Ltd (Korea)


Cabletron Systems Sdn
   Bhd (Malaysia)


Cabletron Systems,
   S.A. de C. V. (Mexico)


Cabletron Systems
   Benelux, B.V. (Netherlands)


Cabletron Systems,
   Pte Ltd. (Singapore)


Cabletron Systems
   S.A. (Spain)


Cabletron Systems,
   A.B. (Sweden)


Cabletron Systems AG
   (Switzerland)


Cabletron Systems de
   Venezuela C.A. (Venezuela)


Cabletron Systems
   India Pvt Ltd. (India)


Aprisma Management
   Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)


Enterasys Networks,
   Inc. (Delaware)


Fivemere Ltd
   (UK)


Fivemere Asia-Pacific
   Singapore Limited (Singapore)


Fivemere Developments
   Limited (UK)


GlobalNetwork
   Technology Services, Inc. (Delaware)


International Cable
   Networks, Inc. (Virgin Islands)


NetVantage, Inc.
   (Delaware)


Network Express, Inc.
   (Michigan)


Network Express GmbH
   (Germany)


Network Express K.K.
   (Japan)


Network Express
   Europe Limited (UK)


The OASys Group, Inc.
   (California)


Riverstone Networks,
   Inc. (Delaware)


ZeitNet Inc.
   (California)
#### J.C. LaCAZE, et ux. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

No. 89-C-1326.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Transportation & Dev. Dept, of;— Defendants); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-0861; Parish of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 53141B.

Prior report: La.App., 541 So.2d 322.

Denied.

CALOGERO and MARCUS, JJ., would grant the writ.
S. Con. Res. 89 Agreed to March 14, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF JOINT COMMITTEE.

There is established a Joint Congressional Committee on Inaugural Ceremonies (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘joint committee’’) consisting of 3 Senators and 3 Representatives, to be

appointed by the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the

House of Representatives, respectively. The joint committee is

authorized to make the necessary arrangements for the inauguration of the President-elect and Vice President-elect of the United

States on January 20, 2001.

SEC. 2. SUPPORT OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE.

The joint committee—

(1) is authorized to utilize appropriate equipment and the

services of appropriate personnel of departments and agencies

of the Federal Government, under arrangements between the

joint committee and the heads of those departments and agencies, in connection with the inaugural proceedings and ceremonies; and
S. Con. Res. 89—2

(2) may accept gifts and donations of goods and services

to carry out its responsibilities.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs; Meeting

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Open Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SBA is issuing this notice to announce the location, date, 
time, and agenda for the next meeting of the Advisory Committee on 
Veterans Business Affairs. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: March 26, 2012 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. in the Eisenhower 
Conference room, side B, located on the 2nd floor.

ADDRESSES: U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), SBA announces the 
meeting of the Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs. The 
Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs serves as an 
independent source of advice and policy recommendation to the 
Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration.
    The purpose of this meeting is scheduled as a full committee 
meeting. It will focus on strategic planning, updates on past and 
current events, and the ACVBA's objective for 2012. For information 
regarding our veterans' resources and partners, please visit our Web 
site at www.sba.gov/vets.
    Further Information: The meeting is open to the public. Anyone 
wishing to attend this meeting or to make a presentation to the 
Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs, advance notice is 
requested. Please contact Cheryl Simms, Program Liaison, at the U.S. 
Small Business Administration, Office of Veterans Business Development, 
409 3rd Street SW., Washington, DC 20416; Telephone number: (202) 619-
1697; Fax number (202) 481-6085 or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abc8c3ced9d2c785d8c2c6c6d8ebd8c9ca85ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="63000b06111a0f4d100a0e0e10231001024d040c15">[email protected]</span></a>.
    If you require accommodations because of a disability, please 
contact the Office of Veterans Business Development at (202) 205-6773 
at least two weeks in advance.

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Dan S. Jones,
SBA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6978 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel
Group (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: November 21, 2006                    /s/ Jiangping Jiang
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jiangping Jiang,
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Leslie LOWENFIELD v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary, Department of Corrections, Hilton Butler, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola.

No. 87-KD-1077.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 12, 1987.

In re Lowenfield, Leslie; applying for stay of execution; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 82-3478.

Stay of execution granted. Writ granted and the case is remanded to the trial court to reset the execution date in accordance with La.R.S. 15:567(C). Otherwise, the application is denied.

DIXON, C.J., concurs. The new execution date must be fixed at least thirty days from the order fixing the new date.