alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's December 31, 1996 audited balance sheet, income statement and cash
flow statement, and notes threto, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       5,113,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             4,509,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                171,667,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      28,513,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        28,015,000
<LOANS>                                    258,833,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,577,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             482,394,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 358,060,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                71,250,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          6,883,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,543,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,658,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             482,394,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             19,557,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           10,479,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               485,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,521,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          14,436,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,428,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       14,093,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  938,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (20,000)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,814,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,996,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,996,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,014,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.41
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,549,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,578,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  998,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    59,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,577,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,327,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        250,000
        

</TABLE>
#### TRAYLOR NURSING HOME, INC. v. ALABAMA STATEWIDE HEALTH COORDINATING COUNCIL.

Civ. 5854.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.

April 5, 1989.

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

HOLMES, Presiding Judge.

The prior judgment of this court has been reversed and remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. On remand to this court, and in compliance with the supreme court’s opinion of September 30, 1988, 543 So.2d 1179, this cause is now reversed and remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the supreme court’s opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

INGRAM, J., concurs.

ROBERTSON, J., not sitting.
#### UNITED STATES of America v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA COUNTY, State of Oklahoma.

No. 2050.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1940.

Whit Y. Mauzy, U. S. Atty., of Tulsa, Okl., for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.
#### Jeffrey Lynn MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-1120.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Nov. 23, 1988.

Robert J. Link of Howell, Liles & Milton, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Bradford L. Thomas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Little v. State,*533 So.2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

JOANOS, WIGGINTON and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 5

Expressing congressional opposition to the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state and urging the President to assert clearly United States opposition to such a unilateral declaration of statehood.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. MACK, Mr. SMITH of Oregon,

Mr. HATCH, Mr. KERREY, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. HELMS, Mr.

ASHCROFT, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. GRAMS, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing congressional opposition to the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state and urging the President

to assert clearly United States opposition to such a unilateral declaration of statehood.

Whereas at the heart of the Oslo peace process lies the basic,

irrevocable commitment made by Palestinian Chairman

Yasir Arafat that, in his words, ‘‘all outstanding issues

relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations’’;

Whereas resolving the political status of the territory controlled by the Palestinian Authority while ensuring
2

•SCON 5 IS

Israel’s security is one of the central issues of the IsraeliPalestinian conflict;

Whereas a declaration of statehood by the Palestinians outside the framework of negotiations would, therefore, constitute a most fundamental violation of the Oslo process;

Whereas Yasir Arafat and other Palestinian leaders have repeatedly threatened to declare unilaterally the establishment of a Palestinian state;

Whereas the unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state

would introduce a dramatically destabilizing element into

the Middle East, risking Israeli countermeasures, a quick

descent into violence, and an end to the entire peace

process; and

Whereas in light of continuing statements by Palestinian

leaders, United States opposition to any unilateral Palestinian declaration of statehood should be made clear

and unambiguous: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That—

3 (1) the final political status of the territory con4 trolled by the Palestinian Authority can only be de5 termined through negotiations and agreement be6 tween Israel and the Palestinian Authority;

7 (2) any attempt to establish Palestinian state8 hood outside the negotiating process will invoke the

9 strongest congressional opposition; and

10 (3) the President should unequivocally assert

11 United States opposition to the unilateral declara-
3

•SCON 5 IS

1 tion of a Palestinian State, making clear that such

2 a declaration would be a grievous violation of the

3 Oslo accords and that a declared state would not be

4 recognized by the United States.

Æ
#### BOB PAUL, INC., Bob Paul, Margaret W. Paul, Jack Paul, Gene Paul, Bryan Paul, Inc., and Wheeler Farms, Inc., Appellants, v. BERRY GROVES, INC., Jack M. Berry Grove Corporation, and Jack M. Berry, Appellees.

No. 86-532.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 28, 1987.

Julian Clarkson, Brooks P. Hoyt, and Steven L. Brannock of Holland & Knight, Tampa, for appellants.

Matthew H. Patton of Kilpatrick & Cody, Atlanta, and Claire L. Hamner of Dickinson, O’Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for appellees.

FRANK, Judge.

The appellants, collectively referred to as “Paul,” appeal from the trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of the appel-lees, hereinafter referred to as “Berry.” We have considered each of the three issues urged by Paul as a basis for reversal of the trial court. We affirm the summary final judgment.

The factual setting in which this dispute arises is summarized as follows: Paul and Berry own adjoining citrus groves in Hen-dry County, Florida. The source of the water normally used to irrigate and at times to flood the groves in anticipation of a freeze is the Labelle Private Drainage District (LPDD). Paul, Berry and others, who are not involved in this proceeding, created the LPDD in an agreement dated March 31, 1965. The distribution of the water supplied by the LPDD is achieved through a three-stage pumping system. Berry pumps water for irrigation and *181freeze protection from pumps located at stage two, and Paul’s water needs derive from pumps located at stage three. The water supply becomes especially critical when a hard freeze is expected.

A severe freeze occurred in January of 1982, which substantially injured Paul’s' groves. Paul sued Beny alleging, *inter alia,*that a lack of water at stage three prevented Paul’s ability adequately to flood its groves. Paul asserted that Berry pumped more than its share of water at stage two.

Our review of the LPDD agreement reveals that it does not contain language prescribing how the water is to be allocated. Although the record discloses the manner in which the parties “thought” the agreement was to operate, the fact is that Paul and Beny did not create an agreement regulating the use or allocation of the water. It certainly is not within the power of the court to rewrite the LPDD agreement. *Home Development Company v. Bursani,*178 So.2d 113 (Fla.1965).

We are unable to find any defect in the trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Berry. *Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s final summary judgment.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2292 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 2505. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 2505. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPA 2505. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Oxepanone polymer, 1-3- 

isobenzofuranedione terminated (CAS No. 117985–60– 

1) (provided for in subheading 3907.99.01) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2292 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 12924-002 and 14077-000]


FFP Project 33, LLC and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; 
Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications 
deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed 
projects to be located on the Mississippi River, in Warren County, 
Mississippi, and Tensas and Madison Parishes, Louisiana. The 
applications were filed by FFP Project 33, LLC for Project No. 12924-
002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14077-
000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the 
Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine 
the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The 
Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided 
in section 4.37 of its regulations.\2\ The priority established by this 
drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with 
identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed 
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the 
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 
20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing 
the results of the drawing.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-702 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


                  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
United States Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2003                  /s/ Bruce D. Benson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Bruce D. Benson
                                          Title: Chairman of the Board, Chief
                                                 Executive Officer and President
                                                 (Chief Executive Officer)


                  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a
separate disclosure document.



<PAGE>

                                  CERTIFICATION


                  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
United States Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2003                  /s/ F. Michael Murphy
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                            Name:  F. Michael Murphy
                                            Title: Vice President and Chief
                                                   Financial Officer
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)


                  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a
separate disclosure document.
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 33

Deploring the actions of President Clinton regarding granting clemency to

FALN terrorists.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 8, 1999

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. HAGEL, Ms.

COLLINS, and Mr. THURMOND) introduced the following joint resolution;

which was read the first time

SEPTEMBER 9, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

SEPTEMBER 14, 1999

Modified, considered, read the third time, and passed

JOINT RESOLUTION

Deploring the actions of President Clinton regarding

granting clemency to FALN terrorists.

Whereas the Armed Forces of National Liberation (the

FALN) is a militant terrorist organization that claims responsibility for the bombings of approximately 130 civilian, political, and military sites throughout the United

States;

Whereas its reign of terror resulted in 6 deaths and the permanent maiming of dozens of others, including law enforcement officials;
2

•SJ 33 CPS

Whereas 16 members of the FALN were tried for numerous

felonies against the United States, including seditious

conspiracy;

Whereas at their trials, none of the 16 defendants contested

any of the evidence presented by the United States;

Whereas at their trials none expressed remorse for their actions;

Whereas all were subsequently convicted and sentenced to

prison for terms up to 90 years;

Whereas not a single act of terrorism has been attributed to

the FALN since the imprisonment of the 16 terrorists;

Whereas no petitions for clemency were made by these terrorists, but other persons sought such clemency for them;

Whereas on August 11, 1999, President William Jefferson

Clinton offered conditional clemency to these 16 terrorists, all of whom have served less than 20 years in prison;

Whereas the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Federal

Bureau of Prisons, and 2 United States Attorneys all reportedly advised the President not to grant leniency to

the 16 terrorists;

Whereas the State Department in 1998 reiterated two longstanding tenets of counter terrorism policy that the

United States will: ‘‘(1) make no concessions to terrorists

and strike no deals’’; and ‘‘(2) bring terrorists to justice

for their crimes’’;

Whereas the President’s offer of clemency to the FALN terrorists violates longstanding tenets of United States

counterterrorism policy; and

Whereas the release of terrorists is an affront to the rule of

law, the victims and their families, and every American
3

•SJ 33 CPS

who believes that violent acts must be punished to the

fullest extent of the law: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That making concessions to terrorists is deplorable and

4 that President Clinton should not have granted clemency

5 to the FALN terrorists.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-K FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                    3,530,866
<SECURITIES>                              6,602,854
<RECEIVABLES>                            17,489,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                183,851
<INVENTORY>                              12,264,794
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         40,559,821
<PP&E>                                   23,947,886
<DEPRECIATION>                            4,230,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           68,823,096
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    11,176,470
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                    153,923
<OTHER-SE>                               57,288,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             68,823,096
<SALES>                                  33,569,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         48,627,569
<CGS>                                    21,825,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            21,825,697
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          8,894,420
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          11,121,289
<INCOME-TAX>                              4,000,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       7,121,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                              7,121,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .43


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lorne Broten hereby certifies as follows:

(a)  I am the Chief Financial Officer of Barrington Sciences Corporation (the
     "Company");

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
     the year ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report") complies in all material
     respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934, as amended; and

(c)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        BARRINGTON SCIENCES CORPORATION

Date:  May 1, 2007
                                        /S/ Lorne Broten
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Lorne Broten
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section
15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to
Section 12 of the Act

No annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders of the
Company. The Company does not anticipate sending out a separate annual report or
proxy material to its security holders subsequent to the filing of the annual
report. In the event that the Company determines that it will send out either a
separate annual report or any proxy materials, the Company will furnish copies
of such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission when it is sent to
security holders.
Order Granting Appellee’s Unopposed Motion

**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA INGE and MARK CAHILL, RANDY**  **an d KERIN GAYNER, WILLIAM**  **an d NANNETTE REED, and**  **IRVING ERICKSON ,** 

Petitioners and Appellants,

v. **CITY OF COLUMBIA FALLS, COLUMBIA FALLS BOARD OF**  **ADJUSTMENT ,** 

Respondents and Appellees, and **CNS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability**  **Company ,**  Respondent. **C au**  **se No . DA**  **- 22**  **- 0395**  **ORDER**

Ha ving read and considered the joint, Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines and there appearing good cause therefore, the Motion is hereby GRANTED. Appellees’ response brief is due **November 30,**  **2022** , and Appellants’ reply brief is due **January 2, 2023.**

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0395