alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2350 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2350

    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Rhenogran TP-50.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Rhenogran TP-50.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RHENOGRAN TP-50.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Rhenogran TP-50) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective column period and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Cornelius GANT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 89-KH-0760.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Gant, Cornelius; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 1899; Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”.

Denied. Moot. Relator’s appellate record has been lodged in the First Circuit.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 160 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 160

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, November 2, 2000, or on Monday, November 6, 2000, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, 
November 14, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Thursday, November 2, 2000, Friday, November 3, 
2000, Saturday, November 4, 2000, Sunday, November 5, 2000, Monday, 
November 6, 2000, Tuesday, November 7, 2000, Wednesday, November 8, 
2000, or Thursday, November 9, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Monday, November 13, 2000, or until 
noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble 
pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs 
first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate November 2 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 160

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
#### Lewis Roger MOORE, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 85SC247.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Oct. 15, 1985.

Petition for Writ of *Certiorari DENIED.*
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), WenXiang Ding, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|/s/ WenXiang DingWenXiang DingChief Executive Officer and PresidentDated: July 13, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13080-003-CT]


Putnam Green Power, LLC; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR Part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47879), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for exemption from licensing for the Cargill 
Falls Hydroelectric Project, to be located on the Quinebaug River, in 
the Town of Putnam in Windham County, Connecticut, and has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff analyzes the 
potential environmental effects of the project and conclude that 
issuing an exemption for the project, with appropriate environmental 
measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly 
affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f393a2d3c30111316111a2c0a0f0f100d0b3f191a0d1c51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a0c0f180905242623242f193f3a3a25383e0a2c2f3829642d253c">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances 
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support.
    For further information, contact Jeff Browning at (202) 502-8677.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7155 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Isiah BELLINGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Case No. 86-265.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 29, 1987.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gitlitz, Keegan & Dittmar and James D. Keegan, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Mulvey v. State,*41 So.2d 156 (Fla.1949); *Myers v. State,*499 So.2d 895 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). This case presents the same question certified in *Condiles v. State,*512 So.2d 331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987):

> IS USE OF THE HABITUAL OFFENDER STATUTE TO EXCEED THE STATUTORILY PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM SENTENCE FOR THE OFFENSE PRECLUDED WHERE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED DOES NOT EXCEED THE RECOMMENDED GUIDELINE SENTENCE?

Question certified.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION


                  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of
United States Exploration, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 15, 2004                        /s/ F. Michael Murphy
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  F. Michael Murphy
                                            Title: Vice President and Chief
                                                   Financial Officer
                                                   (Chief Financial Officer)


                  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the report or as a
separate disclosure document.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 105

Expressing the sense of the Senate relating to consideration of Slobodan

Milosevic as a war criminal.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 24, 1999

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Mr. SPECTER) submitted the

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Senate relating to consideration

of Slobodan Milosevic as a war criminal.

Whereas the International Criminal Tribunal for the former

Yugoslavia (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘International Criminal Tribunal’’) has not sought indictment

of Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic for war crimes

committed by Yugoslav and Serbian military and paramilitary forces in Bosnia;

Whereas Serbian military and paramilitary forces have undertaken a massive ethnic cleansing campaign that has displaced more than one million Kosovar Albanians;

Whereas Serbian military and paramilitary forces have conducted a systematic effort to strip Kosovar Albanians of

their identity by confiscating passports, birth certificates,
2

•SRES 105 IS

employment records, driver’s licenses, and other documents of identification;

Whereas the International Criminal Tribunal has collected

evidence of summary executions, mass detentions, torture, rape, beatings, and other war crimes;

Whereas in 1992, the then-Secretary of State Lawrence

Eagleburger identified Slobodan Milosevic as a war criminal;

Whereas the statute governing the International Criminal

Tribunal requires that the office of the prosecutor need

only determine that a prima facie case exists in order to

seek indictment;

Whereas the House of Representatives and the Senate have

previously passed resolutions condemning Serbian police

actions in Kosovo and calling for Yugoslav leader

Slobodan Milosevic to be indicted for war crimes; and

Whereas the Administration has made no public attempt to

urge the International Criminal Tribunal to seek an indictment against Slobodan Milosevic, despite the necessity of NATO air strikes to respond to his campaign of

genocide: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. SENSE OF SENATE.

3 It is the sense of the Senate that the President

4 should—

5 (1) publicly declare, as a matter of United

6 States policy, that the United States considers

7 Slobodan Milosevic to be a war criminal; and
3

•SRES 105 IS

1 (2) urge the chief prosecutor of the Inter2 national Criminal Tribunal to seek immediately an

3 indictment of Slobodan Milosevic for war crimes and

4 to prosecute him to the fullest extent of inter5 national law.

Æ
#### Virginia M. Monroe, Appellant, *v.*Antonio Musica et al., Defendants. Temple Bar Realty Co., Inc., Respondent.

*Monroe*v. *Musica,*166 App. Div. 929, affirmed.

(Argued January 11, 1916;

decided January 25, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 22,. 1915, which reversed an order of Special Term directing the respondent herein to complete his purchase of premises sold in foreclosure and denying his motion to be relieved therefrom on the ground of defective title. The objections raised by the purchaser arise solely but of a proceeding brought in January, 1898, to sell a portion of the mortgaged premises for the payment of a former deceased owner’s debts, through which proceeding said mortgagor acquired title and may be briefly stated as follows: (1) That the proceedings are invalid and do not bind an infant heir. (2) That the proceedings do not determine the rights of the wife, if any, of a son of decedent. (3) That the bond given by the administrator was insufficient in amount. (4) That there is no evidence or finding by the surrogate that an amount sufficient to pay the decedent’s debts could not be raised by mortgage. (5) That the proceedings were not commenced within three years after letters of administration were first issued to the administrator.

*Henry M. Bellinger, Jr.,*and *James McBrien*for appellant.

*Samuel A. Telsey*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2010- ocfj / 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

lATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMM!' 'ZED 

DOCKET0ST-if:ii-__£fl2j_ _ ACTIO . DATE ^h^ ^ I, >L&/ 0 

This approval and grant of antitrust immunity is subject, v-. htn; ^.pplicable, 

to conditions previously imposed. 

This action is effective after 7 days unless a petition i;: t^!^ -' i--' •• 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on the Depi-'; ; .;-;i 

In view of the agreement's noncontroversial nati;;eatv. :• • , ,<; 

theabove^pK)cedure,the21-dayn^io;iin 14CFR JOJ :.. !•. 

09 February 2010 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

lATA Washington, 

601 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 300 - North Building 

Washington DC 20004
#### ST. LANDRY PARISH POLICE JURY v. CLERK OF COURT OF ST. LANDRY PARISH, et al. ST. LANDRY PARISH CLERK OF COURT v. ST. LANDRY PARISH POLICE JURY. Ruth CAMBRE, et al. v. ST. LANDRY PARISH POLICE JURY.

No. 89-C-0094.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re St. Landry Par. Pol. Jury;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. CA87-1062, CA87-1060, CA87-1061; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 86-288-D, 87-0129-C, 87-0555-A.

Denied.
sole and absolute discretion. Any such decision shall be final andbinding. For the avoidance of doubt, it is understood that the Officer shall not be entitled toparticipate in any other incentive plan or arrangement offered by Fuel Tech.4.2 Modification, Amendment or Termination. This Plan is subject to modification,amendment or termination at any time at the discretion of Fuel Tech. Fuel Tech shall provide theOfficer with written notice of any such modification, amendment or termination.**4.3****No Effect on Employment****. This Plan is not intended to and does not in any way alterthe at-will nature of the Officer’s employment with Fuel Tech, nor does it constitute a guaranteeof employment for a specified period. Employment with Fuel Tech is at will, which means thateither the Officer or Fuel Tech may terminate the employment relationship at any time, with orwithout cause or prior notice. This Plan does not create a contractual relationship or anycontractually enforceable rights between the Company or its wholly owned subsidiaries and theemployee.****4.4****Disclaimer****. This Plan is only valid for the year 2011. There is no guarantee that in2012 or in subsequent years a commission plan or similar plan shall be adopted, and, if adopted,the terms, conditions and provisions of any such plan shall be determined in the sole and absolutediscretion of the Board of Directors of Fuel Tech.**
2
#### STATE ex rel. Francis T. GROS v. R. Hilton BUTLER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 88-KH-0150.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Gros, Francis T.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-KW-0663; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, Nos. 85-968, 85-969.

Granted and remanded to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal, for consideration on the merits. Relator indicated in his Uniform Post Conviction Application that he did not appeal, and the district court records confirm this. There appears no valid basis for a determination that this application is premature.
February 7 , 2012



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FLEX REALTY, L.P., F LEX INVESTMENTS, L.P

. , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 11

- 00788

- CV V.

JANICE LYN CASEY, SU CCESSOR INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTA TE

OF KATHERINE A. JACO BSON, DECEASED , Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard appellant = s motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 25, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. W e further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
Order entered October 27 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 01365
- CR
TERRANCE GERMAINE WI LKINS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10
- 62224
- X



### O RDER Appellant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment on December 5, 2011. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on December 5, 2011 1 and a motion for new trial on December 28, 2011. The trial court certified appellant had the right to appeal. The trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial on January 25, 201 2 , and the State appealed. This Court vacated the trial court’s order granting the new trial and reinstated the judgment of

con viction. State v. Wilkins , No. 05

- 12

- 00154

- CR (Tex. App.

– – Dallas Feb. 4, 2014, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for publication). This Court’s mandate issued on June 13, 2014.

1 Appellant’s December 5, 2011 notice of appeal was not docketed as an appeal in this Court.Appellant filed a second notice of appeal on Februar y 11, 2014, which w as forwarded to this

Court on October 23, 2014. Accordingly, we DIRECT the Clerk to transfer the clerk’s and reporter’s records, including all exhibits, from the appeal in cause no. 05

- 12

- 00154

- CR into the above appeal.
We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing appellant’s February 11, 2014 notice of appeal, as well as all other documents filed in the case from February 4, 2014 until the date of this order. Appe llant’s brief is due within FORTY
- FIVE DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk, and to counsel for all parties. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Regular Totals (Operators)

Airport = EWR

Operator = 0001(Exclude)

Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

12/21/2010 07:54:50

Query Parameters:
12/21/2010 07:54:50

Carrier

Regular Totals (Operators)

Slots Held less than 5 days are Excluded Excludes FAA Held PF7 Status Date = 07/01/2010 (Current & Future)

EWR

AAL AMERICAN AIRLINES 36 

ABX ABX AIR 1

ACA AIR CANADA 18

AFR AIR FRANCE 2

AIC AIR INDIA 2

ASA ALASKA AIRLINES 4 

ASH MESA AIRLINES 4

AVI L'AVION/OPENSKIES 4

AZA ALITALIA 2

BAW BRITISH AIRWAYS 6 

CHQ CHAUTAUQUA 4

CKS KALITTA FLYING SERVICES (AMERICAN INT'L 3

COA CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 902

COM COMAIR AIRLINES 7

CPZ COMPASS AIRLINES 7

CSQ CARGOJET 2

DAL DELTA AIR LINES 38 

DLH DEUTSCHE LUFTHANSA 6

EGF AMR EAGLE HOLDING COPR. (FORMERLY 13

ELY EL AL ISRAEL AIRLINES 1

FDX FED EX 5

FLG PINNACLE AIRLINES (dba NORTHWEST 3

GJS GOJET AIRLINES 7

JAI JET AIRWAYS 2

JBU JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORP. 27 

JZA AIR CANADA JAZZ 6

LOF TRANS STATES, INC. 6

LOT LOT - POLISH AIRLINES 3

MES MESABA AVIATION 4

PDT PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC. (FORMERLY 9

POE PORTER AIRLINES 19

RPA REPUBLIC AIRLINES 4

SAS SCANDINAVIAN AIRLINES 4

SIA SINGAPORE AIRLINES LIMITED 2

SWR SWISS INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES (SWISSAIR 2

TAP TAP-AIR PORTUGAL 2

UAL UNITED AIRLINES 20

UPS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 3

USA US AIRWAYS 19

VIR VIRGIN ATLANTIC AIR 4

WJA WESTJET 2

Page 2
<PAGE>

                                                                DQE Exhibit 23.1

                         Independent Auditors' Consent

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-
60966 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-3, Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration
Statement No. 33-29147 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos. 33-
66488 and 33-72582 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement Nos. 33-46773 and 33-87974 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8,
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-32433 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-4
and Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-80377 and 333-80377-1 of
DQE Capital Corporation on Form S-3 of our report dated January 29, 2002,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of DQE, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2002
#### FLM BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant, v. Fred M. BUSH, Appellee.

No. 86-1483.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 29, 1987.

*195Raymer F. Maguire, III, and Jordan F. Camenker, of Pitts, Maguire & Durie, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

The plaintiff filed an action in Orange County Florida, for money due under a written new account purchase agreement and a written personal guarantee. Each of these documents contains a venue waiver provision under which the defendant waived any and all privileges and rights which he may have under chapter 47, Florida Statutes, relating to venue, and further agreed that any legal action brought for collection of past due accounts may be brought in the appropriate court in Orange County, Florida. The trial court granted the defendant’s amended motion to transfer venue which had alleged that the transactions between the parties, if any, occurred in Palm Beach County, Florida, and that the materials delivered to the defendant, if any, were delivered to Palm Beach County, Florida. The issue of venue is controlled by the parties’ contractual venue provision which is almost identical to that in *Hughes Supply, Inc. v. Lupton,*487 So.2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The trial court’s order transferring venue is reversed, REVERSED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.