alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2048 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2048

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Flumetralin Technical--2-chloro-N-
          [2,6-dinitro-4-(tri-fluoromethyl)phenyl]-N-ethyl-6-
                       fluorobenzenemethanamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Flumetralin Technical--2-chloro-N-
          [2,6-dinitro-4-(tri-fluoromethyl)phenyl]-N-ethyl-6-
                       fluorobenzenemethanamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUMETRALIN TECHNICAL--2-CHLORO-N-[2,6-DINITRO-4-(TRI-
              FLUOROMETHYL)PHENYL]-N-ETHYL-6-FLUOROBENZENEMETHANAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Flumetralin         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Technical--2-                                                      31/2011.......
                          chloro-N-[2,6-
                          dinitro-4-(tri-
                          fluoromethyl)phen
                          yl]-N-ethyl-6-
                          fluorobenzenemeth
                          anamine (CAS No.
                          62924-70-3)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2921.49.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44158

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

DANIEL JESUS ALONZO JR.

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 720

Filed: October 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker , District Judge.

Appeal from judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a

minimum period of confinement of four years, for felony injury to a child,

dismissed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C.

Swinford , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney

General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Daniel Jesus Alonzo, Jr. pled guilty to felony injury to a child . I.C. § § 18

- 1501(1), 18

-

112A . The parties entered into a binding Idaho Criminal Rule 11 plea agreement. Pu rsuant to

the plea agreement, Alonzo waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion regarding the initial

judgment and to appeal any issues including all matters involving the plea or his sentence. The

district court sentenced Alonzo to a unified term of eight years with four years determinate and

retained jurisdiction

. Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished

jurisdiction. Alonzo filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reconsideration of his sentence, which the2

district court denied. Alonzo appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by

denying his Rule 35 motion

.

We hold that Alonzo’s appellate challenge to the denial of the Rule 35 motion has been

waived by his plea agreement. See I.C.R. 11(f)(1); State v. Rodriguez , 142 Idaho 786, 787, 133

P.3d 1251, 1252 (Ct. App. 2 006). Alonzo ’s plea agreement con tained a clause by which Alonzo

waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion . Ac cordingly, we dismiss Alonzo ’s appeal.
#### Jean I. DORVIL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-3059.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 22, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Allyn Giambalvo, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Appellant, Jean I. Dorvil, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for examination and hearing following his commitment to a state mental hospital. We reverse.

The record shows and the state agrees that the appellant was committed to HRS for involuntary hospitalization following a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity in a non-jury trial. The state also agrees that the appellant was entitled to a hearing and to have experts appointed to examine the appellant relative to his continued involuntary hospitalization. *See*Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.218 (1985); *Johnson v. Feder,*485 So.2d 409 (Fla.1986).

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying examination and hearing and remand for proceedings consistent with Rule 3.218.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 141

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 4, 2000

Referred to the Committee on House Administration

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of copies of the publication entitled

‘‘The United States Capitol’’ as a Senate document.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That (a) a revised edition of the publication

3 entitled ‘‘The United States Capitol’’ (referred to as ‘‘the

4 pamphlet’’) shall be reprinted as a Senate document.

5 (b) There shall be printed a total of 2,850,000 copies

6 of the pamphlet in English and seven other languages at

7 a cost not to exceed $165,900 for distribution as follows:

8 (1)(A) 206,000 copies of the pamphlet in the

9 English language for the use of the Senate with

10 2,000 copies distributed to each Member;

11 (B) 886,000 copies of the pamphlet in the

12 English language for the use of the House of Rep-
2

SCON 141 RFH

1 resentatives with 2,000 copies distributed to each

2 Member; and

3 (C) 1,758,000 copies of the pamphlet for dis4 tribution to the Capitol Guide Service in the fol5 lowing languages:

6 (i) 908,000 copies in English;

7 (ii) 100,000 copies in each of the following

8 seven languages: Spanish, German, French,

9 Russian, Japanese, Italian, and Korean; and

10 (iii) 150,000 copies in Chinese.

11 (2) If the total printing and production costs of

12 copies in paragraph (1) exceed $165,900, such num13 ber of copies of the pamphlet as does not exceed

14 total printing and production costs of $165,900,

15 shall be printed with distribution to be allocated in

16 the same proportion as in paragraph (1) as it relates

17 to numbers of copies in the English language.

Passed the Senate October 3 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel; Omics and Genetic Analysis.
    Date: April 6, 2012.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Tony L Creazzo, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7180, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924, 301-435-0725, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#37544552564d4d58435b775a565e5b19595e5f19505841"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fd9e8f989c8787928991bd909c9491d3939495d39a928b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6714 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Lee Andrew CARROLL v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1278.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Carroll, Lee Andrew; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition and mandamus; Parish of Tensas, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”.

Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not already done so, on the motion to quash submitted on or about January 16, 1987, if it has been filed.
EXHIBIT 10.16

      Memorandum of Understanding, dated May 13, 1996, between the Company
                               and Lubov Ulianova


<PAGE>







                                     5-13-96

                           MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

                              Re: U.S. Bridge Corp

1. Lubov Ulianova  ("UL")  residing at: 12 impasse de Presles Paris 75015 France
will loan to Joseph M. Polito, ("JMP"), c/o U.S. BRIDGE, 53-09 97th Place Corona
NY 11368), the sum of 300,000.00 and JMP will simultaneously loan these funds to
USBG. UL will receive through their escrow agent:  Alan Berkun,  Esq. the sum of
550,000 shares of common stock from JMP as collateral for the loan.  Upon NASDAQ
listing of USBG,  JMP will call his loan to USBG who will pay off the debt to UL
with 400,000  shares of stock which will be issued  pursuant to Regulation  "S".
The loan to JMP will be for a 90 day  period  at prime  plus 1%  interest.  Both
parties  acknowledge  that although the escrow  attorney holds 550,000 shares in
escrow,  the total shares due to UL, in event of a default on the loan to UL, is
400,000 common shares, issued pursuant to Regulation "S".

2. JMP will  issue an option to UL to  purchase  600,000  shares at the price of
$1.50.  The option  period shall begin from the date of the closing  (defined as
the wire transfer of the $300,000  dollars to JMP as per item #1.), and expire 6
months after USBG attains a NASDAQ listing.  This option may be exercised at any
time within the exercise period,  subject to a minimum bid price ($3.00), but no
shares exercised can be sold under the Registration (whether S-8 Registration or
Regulation  "S"  Registration),  for a minimum of 6 months  from the date of the
issuance of the option. The option is issued pursuant to Regulation "S" or under
an S-8  registration for JMP. The common stock in USBG must trade at a bid price
of $3.00 for ten consecutive trading days, before the option can be exercised by
UL.

3. UL will  have the  right to loan an  additional  $100,000  to JMP on the same
terms and conditions as paragraph #1 for a period of 30 days.


Agreed this 13th day of May, 1996



USBG by:  ___________________________             ________________________
          JOSEPH M. POLITO-PRES.                  LUBOV ULIANOVA
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fund.com Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Michael Hlavsa, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Fund.com Inc. and will be retained by Fund.com Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/  Michael
      HlavsaMichael
      HlavsaChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer)





November
30, 2009
#### Raylyn Reine BEEVERS v. JEFFERSON PARISH JUVENILE COURT.

No. 89-OC-0563.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Schwegmann, Martin; — Other(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, *894No. 88-CA-0793; Jefferson Parish Personnel Board, No. 1988-15.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant the writ.
# Delegation of Reporting Functions Specified in Section 1045 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012, and Condition 9 of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Russian Federation on the Measures for the Further Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms (the “New Start Treaty”) 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State[,] the Secretary of Defense[, and] the Secretary of Energy 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby delegate to the Secretaries of Defense and Energy the reporting functions conferred upon the President by section 1045 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112-81), and by section (a)(9)(B) of the Resolution of Advice and Consent to Ratification of the New START Treaty. Subsection (a)(9)(B)(iv) of the Resolution shall be fulfilled in coordination with the Secretary of State.

                    The Secretary of Defense is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2012-6993

Billing code 5000-04-P
United StatesCourt of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 17, 2012

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 10-1487

KATHLEEN PAINE, as guardian of the estate of 

Christina Rose Eilman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

RICHARD CASON, et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United 

States District Court for the 

Northern District of Illinois, 

Eastern Division.

No. 06 C 3173

Virginia M. Kendall, Judge.

Order

The slip opinion of this court issued on April 26, 2012, is amended as 

follows:

1. The sentence at 19 reading "Actually they were for the control of 

her bipolar disorder.” is changed to “Yet they may have been for the 

control of her bipolar disorder.”

2. The sentence at 21 reading "Sharon Stokes, a detention aide at the 

Second District, inventoried Eilman’s possessions and found the 

psychotropic medication.” is changed to "Sharon Stokes, a detention aide 
No. 10-1487 Page 2

at the Second District, inventoried Eilman’s possessions and found some 

medication, which may have been for control of her mental condition.”

Defendants-appellants filed a petition for rehearing on May 9, 2012 and 

plaintiff-appellee filed a petition for rehearing on May 11, 2012. All of the judges 

on the panel have voted to deny the petition for rehearing filed by the 

defendants-appellants. A majority of the judges on the panel have voted to deny 

the petition for rehearing filed by the plaintiff-appellee. Judge Rovner voted to 

grant this petition. The petitions for rehearing are therefore DENIED.
#### J.C. CODIAS, Appellant, v. Nely Morales KHAN f/k/a Nely Morales and Olga Costa, Appellees.

No. 86-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Dec. 23, 1986.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1987.

J.C. Codias, in pro. per.

Trenam, Simmons, Kemker, Scharf, Bar-kin, Frye & O’Neill and Dale F. Webner, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Town of Boca Raton v. Raulerson,*108 Fla. 376, 146 So. 576 (1933); *Thomas v. Ratiner,*462 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.060(b) (“Attorneys of other states shall not do a *297general practice unless they are members of The Florida Bar in good standing.”).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16548-16549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6794]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9649-5; CERCLA-04-2012-3768; CERCLA-04-2012-3767; CERCLA-04-2012-
3766; CERCLA-04-2012-3765]


Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site; Davie, Broward 
County, FL; Notice of Settlements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Settlements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into four (4) settlements for past response costs 
concerning the Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site located in 
Davie, Broward County, Florida.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlements 
until April 20, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received 
and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlements if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlements are inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

[[Page 16549]]


ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Florida Petroleum 
Reprocessors by one of the following methods:
    <bullet> www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
    <bullet> Email. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#78281911160c1d0a5628190d1419381d0819561f170e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a1a2b23243e2f38641a2b3f262b0a2f3a2b642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management, Branch Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-6794 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Reya RAHEB and Parvin Pahlevanian Raheb, Appellants, v. Gordon DiBATTISTO, Appellee.

No. 86-3212.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 22, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 21, 1987.

*718Albert J. Krieger and Mark G. Hanson, Miami, for appellants.

Rosen & Switkes and Paul D. Novack, Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order striking the judgment debtors’ homestead affidavit filed in post-judgment execution proceedings and a subsequent order denying a stay of same. We affirm the orders appealed from based on the following briefly stated legal analysis.

At the outset, we construe the instant proceedings below as constituting, in effect, a bill filed pursuant to Section 222.10, Florida Statutes (1985), by a judgment creditor to determine whether the property of a judgment debtor was homestead property. We further conclude that a sufficient showing was adduced below to support the trial court’s finding that the property in question was not homestead property exempt from execution by a judgment creditor. It was shown below, without dispute, that (1) the real property levied upon is owned by Reya Raheb, one of the judgment debtors herein, and (2) both of the said judgment debtors are foreign nationals of Iran who have no permanent resident alien status in the United States. This being so, they are clearly ineligible to place their real property in Dade County, Florida, beyond the reach of judgment creditors pursuant to the Florida homestead exemption provision of Article X, Section 4(a)(1) of the Florida Constitution. *In re Cooke,*412 So.2d 340 (Fla.1982); *see Juarrero v. McNayr,*157 So.2d 79 (Fla.1963); *Alcime v. Bystrom,*451 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We have considered the various points raised on appeal by the judgment debtors herein, but consider these points insufficient to upset the orders appealed from. Such orders are, therefore, in all respects

Affirmed.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 156

To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1474.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1474.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1474)

3 providing for the conveyance of the Palmetto Bend project

4 to the State of Texas, the Secretary of the Senate shall

5 make the following correction:

6 In section 7(a), insert ‘‘not’’ after ‘‘shall’’.

Æ