alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report of Consulier Engineering, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan R. Simon, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/Alan R. Simon
                                                    Alan R. Simon
                                                    Secretary/Treasurer
                                                    Consulier Engineering, Inc.
                                                    April 14, 2003

                                  END OF FILING
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Murphy J. LeBOUEF.

No. 87-KH-1011.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1987.

In re LeBouef, Murphy J.; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, Nos. 24497, 24528.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, for its consideration.
#### Terry ROBERTS, Appellee, v. The CITY OF BETHANY, a municipal corporation; Judson M. Snyder, Inspector; Lee Johnson, Engineer; Duane Cory, Shelton M. James, John Westmoreland, James L. Falkner, Milton P. Seagraves, Harrison J. Cross, Charles E. Dye, and Ray D. Melrose, Councilmen; and Eldon D. Lyon, Mayor, Appellants.

No. 50529.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

July 23, 1979.

ORDER MODIFYING PUBLISHED OPINION OF THE OKLAHOMA COURT OF APPEALS.

After full consideration of the Petition for Certiorari filed in the above styled and numbered cause, which has been heretofore granted by the Court,

IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the opinion in the above styled and numbered cause issued by the Court of Appeals, Division No. 1, on September 11, 1977, and published at 48 Oklahoma Bar Journal 2029, 668 P.2d 350, be modified as follows:

> The last six paragraphs of the opinion, beginning with the words “In *Nolte v. Kansas City Long-Distance Telephone Co.”,*are stricken and the following paragraphs are to be substituted in their place:

> “Thus, Appellee’s proposition that a plaintiff in a mandamus action may be awarded damages is correct. However, there is no authority to support his argument that a plaintiff who successfully secures a Writ of Mandamus is entitled to an award of attorney fees as part of the damages involved. The general rule in this jurisdiction is that attorney fees are not recoverable in damages unless they are specifically provided for by contract or statute. *Joy v. Giglio,*208 Okl. 50, 254 P.2d 351 (1953). This being the case, we cannot say that the trial court erred in refusing to award attorney fees. However, the trial court’s refusal to award damages, pursuant to the provisions of 12 O.S.1971, § 1460, quoted above, did constitute reversible error. This is so, for the statute mandates that a plaintiff ‘shall’ recover the damages which he shall have sustained.

> “For the above stated reasons, the trial court’s issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, and its refusal to award attorney fees, are affirmed, and the trial court’s refusal to award damages is reversed and remanded for a further consideration of damages.

> “AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.”

IT IS THE FURTHER ORDER OF THIS COURT that the judgment and opinion of the Court of Appeals, as modified above, be affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2049 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl Chloride: 

Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 

Chloride: Benzene, 2,4-dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-CHLORO-6-FLUOROBENZYL CHLORIDE: BEN4 ZENE, 2,4-DICHLORO-1,3-DINITRO-5- 

5 (TRIFLUOROMETHYL)-. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2049 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Chloro-6-Fluorobenzyl 

Chloride: Benzene, 2,4- 

dichloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)- (CAS No. 

55117–15–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2903.69.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
50528.

#### AVIS RENT A CAR SYSTEM, INC. v. PALMER.

Argued April 7, 1975

Decided May 15, 1975.

*Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Guerry R. Moore,*for appellant.

*DeVille, Levine & Lewis, Roman A. Deville,*for appellee.

Bell, Chief Judge.

In this negligence suit, the defendant Avis has not shown as a matter of law on its motion for summary judgment that the other defendant, the driver of an Avis vehicle, was an independent contractor and not its employee. The judgment denying the motion is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
# Den Europæiske Unions C 57I/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0871 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 057I |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 63. årgang20. februar 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0871

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 057I

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

63. årgang20. februar 2020

---

| Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- |
| | |
| | |
| | Rådet |
| 2020/C 57 I/01 | Rådets Afgørelse af 17 February 2020 om udpegelse af et medlem af bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for Tyskland | 1 |

Indhold

Side

Rådet

2020/C 57 I/01

Rådets Afgørelse af 17 February 2020 om udpegelse af et medlem af bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for Tyskland

1

---

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

Rådet

| 20.2.2020 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | CI 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2020

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

CI 57/1

---

RÅDETS AFGØRELSE

af 17 February 2020

om udpegelse af et medlem af bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for Tyskland

(2020/C 57 I/01)

RÅDET FOR DEN EUROPÆISKE UNION HAR —

under henvisning til traktaten om Den Europæiske Unions funktionsmåde,

under henvisning til Europa-Parlamentets og Rådets forordning (EF) nr. 1922/2006 om oprettelse af et europæisk institut for ligestilling mellem mænd og kvinder (1), særlig artikel 10, og

under henvisning til de kandidatlister, som medlemsstaternes regeringer har forelagt Rådet, og

ud fra følgende betragtninger:

| (1) | Ved afgørelse af 27. maj 2019 (2) udnævnte Rådet medlemmerne af og suppleanterne til bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for perioden fra den 1. juni 2019 til den 31. maj 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Ved afgørelse af 27. maj 2019 (2) udnævnte Rådet medlemmerne af og suppleanterne til bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for perioden fra den 1. juni 2019 til den 31. maj 2022.

| (2) | Tysklands regering har foretaget en indstilling til en plads, der skal besættes — |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Tysklands regering har foretaget en indstilling til en plads, der skal besættes —

VEDTAGET DENNE AFGØRELSE:

Artikel 1

Følgende udpeges herved til medlem af bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder for Tyskland for den resterende del af den nuværende mandatperiode, der løber indtil den 31. maj 2022:

REGERINGSREPRÆSENTANTER

| Land | Medlem | Suppleanter |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tyskland | Daniela BEHRENS | |

Land

Medlem

Suppleanter

Tyskland

Daniela BEHRENS

Artikel 2

Denne afgørelse træder i kraft på dagen for vedtagelsen.

Udfærdiget i Bruxelles, den 17 February 2020

På Rådets vegne

Formand

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

---

(1)  EUT L 403 af 30.12.2006, s. 9.

1

(2)  Rådets afgørelse af 27. maj 2019 om udpegelse af medlemmer af og suppleanter til bestyrelsen for Det Europæiske Institut for Ligestilling mellem Mænd og Kvinder (EUT C 185 af 29.5.2019, s. 1).

2

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Carmelo Garcia, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Shari Ruth Michels, J., at plea, Linda Poust Lopez, J., at sentencing), rendered April 29, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Shari Ruth Michels, J., at plea, Linda Poust Lopez, J., at sentencing), rendered April 29, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (<i>see Anders v California</i>, 386 US 738 [1967]; <i>People v Saunders</i>, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders</i>, and, upon an independent review of the record, agree that there is no</p><br>valid appealable issue that could be raised on appeal.<p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: October 16, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 25, 2013

t0617 

# Order

Clerk June 25, 2013

146988

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146988

COA: 306903

St Clair CC: 10

- 002936

- FC

TIA MARIE

- MITCHELL SKINNER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### Carl A. DENGEL v. HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK OF NEW ORLEANS.

No. 89-C-0689.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Dengel, Carl A.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CA-0920; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D,” No. 83-18752.

Prior report: La.App., 539 So.2d 947.

Denied.
#### Richard G. HELLER, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 84SC394.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Jan. 31, 1986.

*1024Daniel J. Sears, P.C., Daniel J. Sears, Denver, for petitioner.

Norman S. Early, Jr., Dist. Atty., Brooke Wunnicke, Chief Appellate Deputy Dist. Atty., Valerie Morgan-Alston, Deputy Dist. Atty., Denver, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to consider the decision of the court of appeals in *Heller v. People,*698 P.2d 1357 (Colo.App.1984), which affirmed the conviction of the defendant, Richard G. Heller, on four counts of securities fraud. One of the issues on which we granted certiorari was whether the trial court erred in instructing the jury that good faith is not a defense to the charge of fraudulent and other prohibited practices in the sale of securities.

In *People v. Riley,*708 P.2d 1359 (Colo.1985), we held that such an instruction was erroneous and irreconcilable with the requisite culpability for a securities fraud violation. Our holding in *Riley*is controlling here and requires that the judgment of the court of appeals be reversed. With respect to the other issue on which the writ of certiorari issued, we now discharge the writ as improvidently granted.

The judgment is accordingly reversed, and this case is returned to the court of appeals with directions to remand the case to the district court for a new trial.
#### The DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BROWARD COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Appellant, v. UNITED FACULTY OF FLORIDA and Dr. Maureen J. Hart, Appellees.

No. 4-86-1734.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

James C. Crosland of Muller, Mintz, Kornreich, Caldwell, Casey, Crosland & Bramnick, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Mark S. Levine of Levine and Thompson, Tallahassee, for appellee-Hart.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Waverly Mineral Products Co. v. United Steelworkers,*633 F.2d 682 (5th Cir.1980) and *Hart v. School Board of Wakulla County,*340 So.2d 121 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

ANSTEAD, DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Stephen R. Theroux, is the Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of New
Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. (the Company). This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify
that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement is
authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    Stephen R. Theroux                                                                                            
|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                      
|                     |  |  |  | Stephen R. Theroux Executive Vice
President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Andrew Patterson v. Transcontinental Insurance Company

Ap pellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00464

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 01531

Trial co urt: 129 th District Court, Harris County

Date motion filed: May 3 , 2016

Party filing motion: Andrew Patterson

It is ordered that appellant’s motion for rehearing is DENI ED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Acting Individually Acting for the Court

Before: Justices Bland

, Brown , and Lloyd

.

Date: May 24 , 2016
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Trophy Outfitters, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Don Peay, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | a. | the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | b. | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Don Peay |
|--------|--------------|

Don Peay, President and Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

February 14, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC.

Bit Management Technology of Canada Limited (Canada)
Cabletron Holdings Limited (Mauritius)
Cabletron India Pvt. Ltd. (India)
Cabletron Insurance Company (Vermont)
Cabletron Systems (Distribution) Ltd. (Ireland)
Cabletron Systems Chile (Chile)
Cabletron Systems de Argentina (Argentina)
Cabletron Systems de Colombia, Ltda (Colombia)
Cabletron Systems de Venezuela, C.A. (Venezuela)
Cabletron Systems, A.B. (Sweden)
Cabletron Systems, Inc. (Hong Kong)
Cabletron Systems, Inc. of USA (China)
Cabletron Systems, Pte Ltd (Korea)
Cabletron Systems, S.A. (France)
Cabletron Systems, Sdn Bhd. (Malaysia)
Enterasys Networks A.G. (Switzerland)
Enterasys Networks Acquisition, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks c/o Brasil Representacoes Ltda. (Brazil)
Enterasys Networks Government Sales, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks Handels, GmbH (Austria)
Enterasys Networks Limited (Bermuda)
Enterasys Networks N.V. (Belguim)
Enterasys Networks Netherlands, B.V. (Netherlands)
Enterasys Networks of Canada Limited (Canada)
Enterasys Networks Sales & Service Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks U.K., Ltd. (UK)
Enterasys Networks, GmbH (Germany)
Enterasys Networks, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks, K.K. (Japan)
Enterasys Networks, Pty. Limited (Australia)
Enterasys Networks, S.A. (Spain)
Enterasys Networks, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Enterasys Networks, S.r.l. (Italy)
Enterasys Networks, Singapore Pte Ltd. (Singapore)
Enterasys Services, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Solutions, Inc. (Delaware)
Fivemere Asia-Pacific Singapore Limited (Singapore)
Fivemere Developments Limited (UK)
Fivemere Ltd (UK)
GlobalNetwork Technology Services Pty Ltd (Australia)
GlobalNetwork Technology Services U.K. Limited (UK)
GlobalNetwork Technology Services, Inc. (Delaware)
GNTS Holdings of Canada Limited (Canada)
Indus River Networks, Inc. (Delaware)
International Cable Networks, Inc. (Barbados)
NetVantage, Inc. (Delaware)
Network Express Europe Limited (UK)
Network Express, GmbH (Germany)

                                      104
<PAGE>

                                                        EXHIBIT 22.1 (Continued)

              SUBSIDIARIES OF CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC. (Continued)

Network Express K.K. (Japan)
Network Express, Inc. (Michigan)
Network Security Wizards, Inc. (Maryland)
Tie Line Consultores Associados LTDA. (Brazil)
Aprisma Management Technologies, Inc. (Delaware)
Aprisma Management Technologies Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
Aprisma Management Technologies UK (UK)
BlueCoast Software (California)
Riverstone Networks K.K. (Japan)
Riverstone Networks UK Ltd. (UK)
Riverstone Networks, Inc. (Delaware)
The OASys Group, Inc. (California)

                                      105
#### STATE ex rel. Walter FISHER v. Warden DEES.

No. 89-KH-0083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Fisher, Walter; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 6-88-507.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 42 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.J.Res.42

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                            Joint Resolution

 
Providing for the reappointment of Manuel L. Ibanez as a citizen regent 
         of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance with 
section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (20 U.S.C. 
43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian 
Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress, occurring by 
reason of the expiration of the term of Manuel L. Ibanez of Texas on 
May 4, 2000, is filled by the reappointment of the incumbent for a term 
of 6 years. The reappointment shall take effect on May 5, 2000.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```