alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph Randolph MORGAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 27, 1988.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Jeffrey L. Anderson, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

*992Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This case involves a departure from a recommended guidelines sentence. We reverse. .

On February 24, 1987, appellant Joseph Randolph Morgan was sentenced for committing numerous burglaries while on probation. The recommended guidelines range called for five and one-half to seven years’ imprisonment. The trial judge sentenced appellant to nine and one-half years’ imprisonment, departing from the guidelines for the following written reasons:

> The Court is of the opinion that the defendant needed to be sentenced to consecutive sentences because of his criminal conduct. The defendant's actions constitute a crime wave, crime spree or what other nomenclature might fit this defendant’s actions. It also is the opinion of this Court that the defendant is a danger to this community and only a long period of incarceration will protect the community from this defendant.

A defendant’s “crime spree” is not a valid reason for departure when the convictions are scored. *State v. Rousseau,*509 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla.1987). Being a “danger to the community” is also an invalid reason for departure. *Keys v. State,*500 So.2d 134, 136 (Fla.1986).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions that appellant be re-sentenced within the guidelines. Appellant is also entitled for a credit for all time served while awaiting disposition of the probation violation charges. *See Sapp v. State,*445 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.

COOK, JACK H., Associate Judge, concurs specially with opinion.

COOK, JACK H., Associate Judge,

concurring specially.

On March 10, 1986, the appellant, Joseph Morgan, was placed on probation for burglary. In January of 1987, he was tried for numerous new burglaries, convicted of thirty-one and sentenced to nine and one-half years in prison. The guidelines called for a sentence of five and one-half to seven years.

It is clear to me that the sentence imposed upon Joseph Morgan was reasonable and appropriate in that he perpetrated this series of burglaries in a six-month period immediately following his being placed on probation for the previous burglary. *See Snelling v. State,*500 So.2d 328 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) and *McMillan v. State,*516 So.2d 1064 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). However, this court must restrict its review to the reasons for departure set forth in the sentence and those reasons cannot be sustained. It seems an unfortunate fact that, as the state notes in its brief, “whether the guidelines are correctly departed from [in] a given case often turns on semantics and fine nuances.”
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 156 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 156

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (S. 1474) entitled ``An Act 
providing for conveyance of the Palmetto Bend project to the State of 
Texas.'', the Secretary of the Senate shall make the following 
correction:
            In section 7(a) insert ``not'' after ``shall''.

            Passed the Senate October 26 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 156

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

      To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill S. 1474.
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.08 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2031 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on o-tert-Butylcyclohexanol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on o-tertButylcyclohexanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. O-TERT-BUTYLCYCLOHEXANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.62 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 o-tert-Butylcyclohexanol) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2031 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Henry RICCIO and Jean Riccio, Appellants, v. GOLD COAST CAPITAL CORP., Appellee.

No. 87-642.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Ress, Gomez, Rosenberg, Howland & Mintz and Sheldon Rosenberg, for appellants.

Broad & Cassel and Steven W. Davis, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The record supports the trial court’s determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. *See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc.,*408 So.2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *see also Tippett v. Frank,*238 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).

Affirmed.
#### Debra FONTENOT v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSPITAL, et al.

No. 87-C-0713.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Bibo, Frank Dr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of *63Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 86-309; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 85-2002-D.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 709.

Denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 122 (Wednesday, June 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36044-36045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14819]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of 229 Boundary Revision for the East Tennessee Technology 
Park (Formerly the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant, K-25)

AGENCY: Department of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of 229 Boundary Revisions for the East Tennessee 
Technology Park (ETTP) (formerly the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant, 
K-25).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Energy, 
pursuant to Section 229 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, 
as implemented by 10 CFR part 860 published in the Federal Register 
(FR) on August 26, 1963 (28 FR 8400), prohibits the unauthorized entry, 
as provided in 10 CFR 860.3 and the unauthorized introduction of 
weapons or dangerous materials, as provided in 10 CFR 860.4, into or 
upon the following described facilities of the ETTP of the United 
States Department of Energy. The following amendments are made:
    The U.S. Department of Energy installation known as the ETTP is 
located in the Second Civil District of Roane County, Tennessee, within 
the corporate limits of the city of Oak Ridge, on the north side of 
Highway 58 (Oak Ridge Turnpike) approximately one mile east of Gallaher 
Bridge which spans the Clinch River. The previous ETTP 229 Security 
Boundary contained 3 areas which totaled 422 acres. This revised ETTP 
229 Security Boundary for ETTP is divided into 4 areas totaling 168.7 
acres. Area 1 is 135.8 acres and is known as the K-25/K-27 Project 
Site. Area 2 is 6.5 acres and is known as the K-1070-B. Area 3 is 24.8 
acres known as K-1070-C & -D. Area 4 is 1.6 acres known as the K-1650 
(Y-12 facility). The 229 Security Boundary for these areas is indicated 
by chain link fencing and/or cable and post configuration which 
surrounds each of the four areas.

[[Page 36045]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Finn, Real Estate 
Contracting Officer DOE Oak Ridge Office, Post Office Box 2001, Oak 
Ridge, Tennessee 37831, Telephone: (865) 576-4431, Facsimile: (865) 
241-9494.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This security boundary is designated 
pursuant to Section 229 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. This revised 
boundary supersedes and/or re-describes the entries previously 
contained in the FR notice published October 19, 1965 at 30 FR 13285; 
amended on March 30, 1967 at 32 FR 5384; and April 21, 1983 at 48 FR 
17134; and January 23, 2008, at 73 FR 3950 for the ETTP of the United 
States Department of Energy.

    Issued in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on June 12, 2014.
Cindy B. Finn,
Real Estate Contracting Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-14819 Filed 6-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### Martin BENNETT, Bennie E. Clark, Laura Bennett Adams, Evisteen Jordan Ross, Theropes Camble and Evis Jordan, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & DEVELOPMENT, William H. Stine, Eva Castor, Lee Castor and J.C. Penney Insurance Company and American Family Home Insurance Company.

No. 87-C-0664.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Stine, William H.; J.C. Penney Insurance Co.; American Family Home Ins. *59Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 18156-CA, 18157-CA; Parish of East Carroll, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 13817, 13884.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 1022.

Denied.
III

Calendar No. 379

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 30

Recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of members of America’s nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and private volunteer organizations

(PVO’s) throughout their history and specifically in answer to their

courageous response to recent disasters in Central America and Kosovo.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 27, 1999

Mr. SMITH of Oregon (for himself, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. SARBANES, and Mr. BROWNBACK) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Reported by Mr. HELMS, without amendment

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of members of

America’s nongovernmental organizations (NGO’s) and

private volunteer organizations (PVO’s) throughout their

history and specifically in answer to their courageous

response to recent disasters in Central America and

Kosovo.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—
2

SCON 30 RS

1 (1) recognizes and commends the sacrifice,

2 dedication, and commitment of those serving with,

3 and those who have served with, American non4 governmental organizations (NGO’s) and private vol5 unteer organizations (PVO’s) that provide humani6 tarian relief to millions of the world’s poor and dis7 placed;

8 (2) urges all Americans to join in commemo9 rating and honoring those serving in, and those who

10 have served in, America’s NGO and PVO community

11 for their sacrifice, dedication and commitment; and

12 (3) calls upon the people of the United States

13 to appreciate and reflect upon the commitment and

14 dedication of relief workers, that they often serve in

15 harm’s way with threats to their own health and

16 safety, and their organizations who have responded

17 to recent tragedies in Central America and Kosovo

18 with great care, skill, and speed, and to make appro19 priate steps to recognize and encourage awareness of

20 the contributions that these relief workers and their

21 organizations have made in helping ease human suf22 fering.

Calendar No. 379

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 30

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the sacrifice and dedication of members of America’s nongovernmental organizations

(NGO’s) and private volunteer organizations(PVO’s) throughout their history and specificallyin answer to their courageous response to recentdisasters in Central America and Kosovo.

NOVEMBER 3, 1999

Reported without amendment
#### MANREB INTERNATIONAL REALTY, N.V., a Netherlands Antilles Corp., Appellant, v. IMPERIAL ROOF TRUSS, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-1063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Wallace, Engels, Pertnoy & Martin and Frank D. Newman, Miami, for appellant.

Haley, Sinagra & Perez and J.T. Haley, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s denial of the defendant’s Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b) motion to set aside a default and final default judgment is affirmed upon the holdings that (a) at best, the orders in question were entered through the inexcusable actions of authorized representatives of the defendant corporation, which cannot provide the basis of granting the defendant relief, see *Herrick v. Southeast Bank, N.A.,*512 So.2d 1029, 1030 n. 3 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); see also *California Club Realty, Inc. v. Lucca,*517 So.2d 72, 73 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and (b) the denial of the appellant’s motion for continuance of the Rule 1.540 hearing was not an abuse of discretion. *In re Gregory,*313 So.2d 735 (Fla.1975).

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2245 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2245

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain children's 
                               products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain children's 
                               products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain children's optical 
products) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
| (a)   | All      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,      process, summarize and report financial information;  and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   |  Any      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control      over financial reporting. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     April      30, 2008 |            /s/ Jeffrey A. Cook                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        | Jeffrey      A. CookExecutive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 151 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 151

     To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2348.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

 Mr. Murkowski (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
     To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2348.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2348) entitled ``An Act to 
authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide cost sharing for the 
endangered fish recovery implementation programs for the Upper Colorado 
and San Juan River Basins.'', the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
shall make the following correction: Strike section 4 and insert:

``SEC. 4. EFFECT ON RECLAMATION LAW.

    ``Specifically with regard to the acreage limitation provisions of 
Federal reclamation law, any action taken pursuant to or in furtherance 
of this title will not--
            ``(1) be considered in determining whether a district as 
        defined in section 202(2) of the Reclamation Reform Act of 1982 
        (43 U.S.C. 390bb) has discharged its obligation to repay the 
        construction cost of project facilities used to make irrigation 
        water available for delivery to land in the district;
            ``(2) serve as the basis for reinstating acreage limitation 
        provisions in a district that has completed payment of its 
        construction obligations; or
            ``(3) serve as the basis for increasing the construction 
        repayment obligation of the district and thereby extending the 
        period during which the acreage limitation provisions will 
        apply.''.
                                 <all>
```
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 45

Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20, 1999, 30th anniversary

of the first lunar landing should be a day of celebration and reflection

on the Apollo-11 mission to the Moon and the accomplishments of the

Apollo program throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20, 1999

Mr. SHELBY (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. SMITH of

New Hampshire, Mr. GRAHAM, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. ABRAHAM, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BUNNING, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. LOTT, Mr. JOHNSON,

Mr. BREAUX, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. BURNS, Mr. BYRD, Mr.

BROWNBACK, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. COVERDELL, Mr. HELMS, Mr. SPECTER,

Mr. THURMOND, Mr. THOMAS, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. DODD, Mr. FEINGOLD,

Mr. LEVIN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. MACK, Mr. FRIST, Mr.

ENZI, and Mr. GREGG) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary:

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20, 1999,

30th anniversary of the first lunar landing should be

a day of celebration and reflection on the Apollo-11

mission to the Moon and the accomplishments of the

Apollo program throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Whereas the Apollo-11 mission successfully landed a manned

spacecraft on the Moon on July 20, 1969, marking the

first time in history that humans have walked on the surface of the Moon or any other planet;
2

•SCON 45 IS

Whereas the 6 Apollo missions successfully departed Earth

aboard a Saturn V Rocket, the largest and most powerful

American rocket ever produced, en route to the Moon;

Whereas 12 Americans successfully landed on the surface of

the Moon where they performed various experiments and

collected samples for study, and planted the flag of the

United States of America in the lunar soil achieving a

milestone in American and human history;

Whereas the contributions of other Americans who made up

the thousands of contractors and Government employees

who worked on the Apollo program are recognized; and

Whereas the events of the Apollo missions are examples of

the great achievements of the American space program

reflecting the explorer’s spirit of the American people:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 30th

3 anniversary of the first lunar landing should be a day of

4 celebration and reflection on the Apollo-11 mission to the

5 Moon and the accomplishments of the Apollo program

6 throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Æ