alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Paul M. McCARTY.

No. 87-K-0315.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re McCarty, Paul M.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA 86 0393; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 9-85-797.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 292.

Denied.
I, Rebecca Tyson Smith, Environmental Program Specialist of The Department of 

Environmental Conservation, being sworn, state the following: 

The Department ofEnvironmental Conservation tentatively scheduled an oral hearing, available 

upon request as stated in the notice of proposed regulations, for June 24,2015, at 1200- 1330, in 

Conference Room A, Department ofEnvironmental Conservation Building, 619 E. Ship Creek, 

Ste. 249, Anchorage, AK 99501. No member of the public requested an oral hearing, and the 

public hearing was cancelled and noticed as stated in the notice of proposed regulations. 

DATE: ~ 6i2J5" 

Juneau, ~ ska 

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this2atl. day of ~ , Qo 15 . t4 {:F{l/1. [NOTARY SEAL] Notary Public in and for the 

State of Alaska tJ/1 

My commission expires: WLfh c.e_ 

STATE OF ALASKAc:·~~,;

OFFICIAL SEAL .~-: Claire Fishwick ''_: · • 

NOTARY PUBL.IC 

My Commlssl.on Expires With Office
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 21

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the President of the United States is

3 authorized to conduct military air operations and missile

4 strikes in cooperation with our NATO allies against the

5 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro).

Passed the Senate March 23, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 21

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing the President of the United States to

slavia (Serbia and Montenegro).strikes against the Federal Republic of Yugoconduct military air operations and missile
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 154

To acknowledge and salute the contributions of coin collectors.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 23 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. LOTT (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. STEVENS, Mr.

MCCONNELL, Mr. DODD, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. GORTON, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To acknowledge and salute the contributions of coin

collectors.

Whereas in 1982, after a period of 28 years, the Congress

of the United States resumed the United States commemorative coin programs;

Whereas since 1982, 37 of the Nation’s worthy institutions,

organizations, foundations, and programs have been commemorated under the coin programs;

Whereas since 1982, the Nation’s coin collectors have purchased nearly 49,000,000 commemorative coins that have

yielded nearly $1,800,000,000 in revenue and more than

$407,000,000 in surcharges benefitting a variety of deserving causes;
2

•SCON 154 ATS

Whereas the United States Capitol has benefitted from the

commemorative coin surcharges that have supported such

commendable projects as the restoration of the Statue of

Freedom atop the Capitol dome, the furtherance of the

development of the United States Capitol Visitor Center,

and the planned National Garden at the United States

Botanic Gardens on the Capitol grounds;

Whereas surcharges from the year 2000 coin program commemorating the Library of Congress bicentennial benefit

the Library of Congress bicentennial programs, educational outreach activities (including schools and libraries), and other activities of the Library of Congress; and

Whereas the United States Capitol Visitor Center commemorative coin program will commence in January 2001, with

the surcharges designated to further benefit the Capitol

Visitor Center: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the Congress of the United States acknowledges and

4 salutes the ongoing generosity, loyalty, and significant role

5 that coin collectors have played in supporting our Nation’s

6 meritorious charitable organizations, foundations, institu7 tions, and programs, including the United States Capitol,

8 the Library of Congress, and the United States Botanic

9 Gardens.

Æ
The Valley Air District covers eight counties including San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare and the 

Valley air basin portion of Kern. Visit www.valleyair.org to learn more.

News Release 

For immediate release 

DATE 8-25-10 

For: local news, business and 

assignment editors 

North District Media Contact - Modesto 

Anthony Presto (209) 557-6400 

Central District Media Contact - Fresno 

Jaime Holt (559) 230-5850 

South District Media Contact - Bakersfield 

Brenda Turner (661) 392-5500 

Spanish language Media Contact 

Claudia Encinas (559) 230-5851 

Air District offers charbroiler retrofits 

incentives

In order to reduce harmful emissions resulting from charbroiling meat, the Valley Air 

District is offering new funding to retrofit commercial charbroilers. 

The Char broiler Incentive Program (CHIP) opens today and will take applications for 

eight weeks for a total of $500,000 in funding. This new program is part of the Air 

District’s efforts to advance new emission reduction technologies at sources throughout 

the Valley. 

“Because of the challenges we face in the Valley to attaining clean air, we are looking at 

all emission sources, and commercial charbroilers are one of those sources,” said 

Samir Sheikh, the director of the Strategies and Incentives Program, which offers the 

funding. 

Commercial under-fired charbroilers emit particulate matter and volatile organic 

compounds, two categories of pollutant that have harmful health effects. 

The Air District estimates five to 10 projects will be funded. Eligibility criteria include: 

 Retrofit devices must reduce VOC emissions by 86 percent and particulate 

matter 10 microns and under (PM10) by 83 percent. 

 Targeted devices include: 

o HEPA filtration system 

o Electrostatic precipitator 

o Wet scrubber 

o Thermal oxidizer 

-more- 
Charbroiler incentives available 

8-25-10 

Page 2 of 2 

The Valley Air District covers eight counties including San Joaquin, Stanislaus, Merced, Madera, Fresno, Kings, Tulare and the 

Valley air basin portion of Kern. Visit www.valleyair.org to learn more. 

The maximum eligible amount per project will be determined by calculating cost 

effectiveness. Consideration will be given to restaurant size and the type of control 

device implemented. 

For more information on the program, visit 

http://www.valleyair.org/Grant_Programs/GrantPrograms.htm.

 

For more information about the Valley Air District, call a regional office: in Fresno, 559-

230-6000; in Bakersfield, 661-392-5500; and in Modesto, 209-557-6400.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on January 27, 2012, Cody Laboratories, Inc., 601 Yellowstone Avenue, Cody, Wyoming 82414, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
Schedule4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)
IIThebaine (9333)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances as bulk intermediates for distribution to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, 
                    **Federal Register**
                     Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than May 21, 2012. Dated: March 8, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-6721 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
50279.

#### GAINESVILLE LIQUIDATION, INC. v. HANLEY et al.

Evans, Judge.

This is a dispossessory warrant proceeding. Defendants demurred to the allegations of the affidavit as being mere conclusions of the pleader. They also filed an answer contending there was an option to renew the lease which had been exercised. They also filed a counterclaim *473in which they sought general and punitive damages, arising out of a conspiracy of the plaintiffs and others to enter into a different lease as to the property and to oust defendants.

Argued February 25, 1975

Decided April 7, 1975.

*Schuder & Brown, George W. Brown, P. J. Schuder,*for appellant.

*Douglas W. McDonald,*for appellees.

After an evidentiary hearing, the lower court rendered a finding of facts and conclusions of law. The court held the dispossessory affidavit was sufficient and not subject to the demurrer; granted to plaintiffs a writ of possession; and also held that all other issues raised by the pleadings (except as to the right of possession) "shall proceed in accordance with the procedures authorized by law and until further order of this court.” *Held:*

1. An affidavit alleging the tenant is in possession of certain property and is holding over beyond the term for which same was rented or leased; that the owners desire and have demanded possession of said building and property, and same has been refused by the tenant, is amply sufficient as an allegation of ultimate facts. A demurrer that same are mere conclusions of the pleader unsupported by sufficient averments of fact as required by this special statutory proceeding was properly overruled. See Code Ann. § 61-303; *Wilson v. Healey Real Estate &c. Co.,*203 Ga. 52 (2) (45 SE2d 656).

2. In the absence of a transcript of evidence, this court must assume the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment and affirm it. *Berrien v. Avco Financial Services,*127 Ga. App. 584 (194 SE2d 337); *Ward v. National Dairy Products Corp.,*224 Ga. 241 (2) (161 SE2d 305).

3. The lower court did not err in issuing the writ of possession, leaving at issue the counterclaim and the subsequent questions of discovery and trial as to that claim.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Stolz, J., concur.*
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





**Pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted
      Pursuant to**


**Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








Pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, and in connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Simtrol,
      Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of the Company, each hereby certify that (1) the Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





This
      Certification
      shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      be
      deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934.





This
      Certification
      is signed on March 28, 2008.





/s/
                Richard
                W. Egan
              
              Richard
                W.
                Egan
              President
                and
                Chief Executive Officer
              
              /s/
                Stephen
                N. Samp
              
              Stephen
                N.
                Samp
              Chief
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
    
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: May 13, 2011
#### Laurie Barker PIGOTT v. Roger L. AUCOIN.

No. 87-CC-1358.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Pigott, Laurie Barker; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 332-400; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-0481.

Granted. The presiding judge is ordered to assign this matter to a district judge to schedule immediately a hearing on or before Friday, June 19, and notify parties and counsel.
#### Vincent ANCAR, et al. v. LYKES BROS. STEAMSHIP CO., INC. v. Dr. Luis BOGRAN and International Maritime Services, Ltd.

No. 87-CC-0546.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 3, 1987.

In re Bogran, Luis Dr. — Third Party; applying for supervisory writ and writ of review; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “B”, No. 86-3321; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. C 7129.

Denied.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
#### The BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, KANSAS, v. J. Z. MILLER and O. Q. Claflin, Trustees, etc.

No. 1941.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Jan. 18, 1940.

M. F. Cosgrove, of Topeka, Kan., for appellant.

W. C. Michaels, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Considered by the court that the order appealed from was not a final order and such order not reviewable on appeal.
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British
Virgin Islands international business company (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form
20-F") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: September 29, 2006             /s/ Anthony So
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Anthony So
                                      Chairman


Dated: September 29, 2006             /s/ Cathy Kit Teng Pang
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Cathy Kit Teng Pang
                                      Director of Finance
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10572

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

DANIEL DIXON, also known as Jason Lee Smallwood,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:16-CR-29-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel Dixon moves 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 26, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10572 Document: 00514657217 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/26/2018
No. 18-10572

2

to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Dixon has not filed 

a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. 

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-10572 Document: 00514657217 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/26/2018
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 138 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas human progress in the 21st century will depend upon global understanding 
        and cooperation in finding positive solutions to hunger and violence;
Whereas the turn of the millennium offers unparalleled opportunity for humanity 
        to examine its past, set goals for the future, and establish new 
        patterns of behavior;
Whereas the people of the United States and the world observed the day 
        designated by the United Nations General Assembly as ``One Day in Peace, 
        January 1, 2000'' (General Assembly Resolution 54/29);
Whereas the example set on that day ought to be recognized globally and repeated 
        each year;
Whereas the people of the United States seek to establish better relations with 
        one another and with the people of all countries; and
Whereas celebration by the breaking of bread together traditionally has been the 
        means by which individuals, societies, and nations join together in 
        peace: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) each year should begin with a day of peace and sharing 
        during which--
                    (A) people around the world should gather with 
                family, friends, neighbors, their faith community, or 
                people of another culture to pledge nonviolence in the 
                new year and to share in a celebratory new year meal; 
                and
                    (B) Americans who are able should match or multiply 
                the cost of their new year meal with a timely gift to 
                the hungry at home or abroad in a tangible 
                demonstration of a desire for increased friendship and 
                sharing among people around the world; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation each year 
        calling on the people of the United States and interested 
        organizations to observe such a day with appropriate programs 
        and activities.

            Passed the Senate October 27 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 138

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that a day of peace and sharing should 
             be established at the beginning of each year.
```
#### The Security Bank of New York, Appellant, *v.*Herman Finkelstein, Respondent.

*Security Bank of Mew York*v. *Finkelstein,*160 App. Div. 315, affirmed.

(Argued March 10, 1916;

decided March 24, 1916.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 31, 1913, which affirmed a determination of the Appellate Term affirming a judgment of the City Court of the city of New York in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict. The action was brought on February 19, 1912, to recover a balance upon a promissory note made by the defendant on January 3, 1905, payable on demand. The answer, *inter alia,*pleads the Statute of Limitations, which was the only issue tried.

*George P. Breckenridge*for appellant.

*Charles Goldzier*and *Max Schenkman*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, March 25, 1999,

4 Friday, March 26, 1999, Saturday, March 27, 1999, or

5 Sunday, March 28, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant

6 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

7 designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on

8 Monday, April 12, 1999, or until such time on that day

9 as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee

10 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the

11 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur12 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

13 occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the

14 legislative day of Thursday, March 25, 1999, or Friday,

15 March 26, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this con16 current resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee,

17 it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 12,

18 1999, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the sec19 ond day after Members are notified to reassemble pursu-
2

SCON 23 ES

1 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

2 occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

4 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

5 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

6 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen7 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

8 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 23

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate and the House of Representatives.