alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from form 10-k at
January 2, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
information.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                            JAN-02-1999
<CASH>                                                    3,174,000
<SECURITIES>                                             16,107,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                            23,174,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              2,536,000
<INVENTORY>                                               9,857,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         51,579,000
<PP&E>                                                   56,243,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                            9,850,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          107,874,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    14,499,000
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                    323,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               87,130,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            107,874,000
<SALES>                                                  70,962,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         84,386,000
<CGS>                                                    54,774,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            54,774,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         16,488,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (2,681,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (2,681,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                             (2,681,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 (0.08)
        





</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-5255

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BURTON ARNOLD COKER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (2:01-cr-00037) Submitted: July 13, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Janna D. Allison, Waynesville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Burton Arnold Coker appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eight months’ imprisonment. Coker’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but suggesting that the district court erred by revoking and sentencing Coker based on supervised release violations. Coker has been informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. Pursuant to Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Coker admitted to violations of his supervised release, and we find his sentence was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that such a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

      ( print page 16890)    
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of ProElite, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 30, 2008.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Universal Guardian Holdings, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2007.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 20, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 2, 2012.

By the Commission.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-7010 Filed 3-20-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit
      10.19








February
      15, 2007






**PROMISSORY
      NOTE**


**ZYNEX
      MEDICAL, INC.**






For
      value
      received, Zynex Medical Holdings, Inc. (“Zynex”) promises to pay to the order of
      Peter J. Leveton (hereinafter "Holder"), in legal tender, the sum of $82,524.00
      plus interest on the outstanding balance at the annual rate of 8.25%. This
      Note
      commences February 15, 2007 (hereinafter "Commencement Date").





The
      note
      will be amortized in eight (8) equal payments of principal and interest of
      $10,637.19 each, with the first payment due March 15, 2007 and each additional
      payment due on the 15 th day of
      the next following month until paid in full. All principal and interest shall
      be
      fully repaid no later than October 15, 2007. The note may be prepaid without
      penalty at Zynex’s option at any time.





In
      the
      event of a default under the terms of this Note and upon ten days following
      written demand by Holder to cure such default and such default having not been
      cured, Holder may, at Holder's sole and absolute discretion, declare all
      remaining principal and interest immediately due and payable. Waiver by Holder
      hereof to enforce any provisions of this Note shall not operate to bar Holder's
      rights to enforce any provisions of this Note at any later time or for any
      later
      default.





All
      notices, payments and performance of the obligations under this Note shall
      be
      made to Peter J. Leveton or heirs or assigns at 8101 S. Peninsula Drive.
      Littleton, CO 80120 or such other location as the Holder may notify Zynex in
      writing. All notices or demands to the Company shall be given in writing to
      the
      Company’s Chief Executive Officer at its principal office location at 8100
      Southpark Way, Unit A-9, Littleton, Colorado 80120. Notices to all parties
      will
      be deemed provided when actually received by the other party.





This
      Note
      shall be governed and interpreted under the laws of the State of Colorado.








/s/
      Thomas Sandgaard


Zynex
      Medical Holdings, Inc.


Thomas
      Sandgaard


President
      and Chief Executive Officer ****
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 157

  Expressing the Sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico 
  should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the 
 Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty between the 
                       United States and Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 31 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mrs. Hutchison (for herself and Mr. Gramm) submitted the following 
 concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the Sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico 
  should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the 
 Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty between the 
                       United States and Mexico.

Whereas, the United States and Mexico signed a Treaty on Water Utilization on 
        February 3, 1944, to divide the waters of the Rio Grande and Colorado 
        River systems, and;
Whereas, the Treaty required Mexico to deliver a minimum of 350,000 acre feet of 
        water per year on a five year average from six Mexican tributaries, and;
Whereas, the Treaty required the United States to deliver a minimum of 1,500,000 
        acre feet of water per year from the Colorado River, and;
Whereas, the United States has never failed to meet its obligation under the 
        Treaty, and;
Whereas, during the period of 1992-1997, Mexico failed to meet its obligations 
        under the treaty by 1,024,000 acre feet, and;
Whereas, a recent study conducted by the Texas A&M University agriculture 
        program has determined the economic impact to South Texas from this 
        water loss due to non-compliance with the Treaty at $441,000,000 per 
        year;
Whereas, the Government of Mexico has not presented any plan to repay its entire 
        water debt, as required by the Treaty: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that:
            (1) The President of the United States should promptly 
        utilize the full powers of his office to bring about compliance 
        with the 1944 Treaty on Water Utilization in order that the 
        full requirement of water be available for United States use 
        during the next full crop season.
            (2) The United States Section of the International Boundary 
        and Water Commission should work to bring about full compliance 
        with the 1944 Treaty on Water Utilization and not accept any 
        water debt or deficit repayment plan which does not provide for 
        the full repayment of water owed.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the annual report on Form
10-KSB of Simtrol, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

      This Certification is signed on March 31, 2006.


                                     /s/ Richard W. Egan
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Richard W. Egan
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer

                                     /s/ Stephen N. Samp
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen N. Samp
                                     Chief Financial Officer
CHARTER OF
                             THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
                            OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                         OF CHARYS HOLDING COMPANY, INC.

     The  Executive  Committee  of  Charys  Holding  Company,  Inc.,  a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  is  a committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company,  the  composition  and  responsibilities of which are described in this
Executive  Committee  Charter.

     1.     Composition. In accordance with Article III of  the  Bylaws  of  the
            -----------
Company,  the  Board  of  Directors,  by resolution adopted by a majority of the
whole  Board  of  Directors, may designate an Executive Committee. The Executive
Committee  shall  consist  of  no  fewer  than  ___  members. The members of the
Executive  Committee  shall be appointed by the Board of Directors. The Chairman
of  the  Board  of  Directors  shall  be  the  Chair of the Executive Committee;
provided,  however,  that  if  the  Chairman  of  the  Board  of Directors is an
executive officer or employee of the Company, then the Chairman of the Executive
Committee  of  the  Board  of  Directors  shall  be an independent director. The
members  of  the Executive Committee shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of
Directors  or  until their successors shall be duly designated. Vacancies in the
Executive  Committee  shall  be  filled  by  the  Board  of  Directors.

     2.     Responsibilities.  In  accordance  with  Article  III  of the Bylaws
            ----------------
of  the  Company,  during  the  intervals  between  the meetings of the Board of
Directors,  the  Executive  Committee  shall  have  and  may exercise all of the
authority of the Board of Directors in the management of the business affairs of
the  Company  to  the  extent  authorized  by  the  resolution providing for the
Executive  Committee  or  by  subsequent resolution adopted by a majority of the
whole  Board  of  Directors.  This  authorization  is subject to the limitations
imposed  by  law,  the  Bylaws  of  the  Company  or  the  Board  of  Directors.

     3.     Reporting.  The  Executive  Committee  shall keep written minutes of
            ---------
each  meeting,  which shall set forth the Committee's actions, and shall be duly
filed  in the Company's records. Reports of meetings of the Executive Committee,
including a report of all actions taken, shall be made to the Board of Directors
at  its  next  regularly  scheduled  meeting,  following the Executive Committee
meeting,  accompanied  by any recommendations to the Board of Directors approved
by  the  Executive  Committee.

                                   By   Order of  the  Board  of  Directors,


                                   By
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                        Billy V. Ray, Jr., Chief Executive
                                        Officer

Dated  August  ___,  2004.
#### Lynn Almloff LINDNER v. Dennis Ray LINDNER.

No. 87-C-1044.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Lindner, Lynn Almloff; applying for writ of certiorari and/review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA 6499; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 86-7523.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 609.

Granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is amended to delete the reduction of alimony pendente lite; the award of $2231 per month shall continue until final divorce. See C.C. arts. 148 and 160.
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Michael J. Green, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Republic Property Trust;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 7, 2006          By: /s/ Michael J. Green
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO  RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Robert E. Farr

Robert E. FarrChief Executive Officer