alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 18, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on November 28, 2011, 76 FR 72974, Johnson Matthey Inc., Custom Pharmaceuticals Department, 2003 Nolte Drive, West Deptford, New Jersey 08066-1742, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
IDifenoxin (9168)
IPropiram (9649)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethamphetamine (1105)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IINabilone (7379)
IICocaine (9041)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIDiphenoxylate (9170)
IIEcgonine (9180)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone intermediate (9254)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IIRemifentanil (9739)
IISufentanil (9740)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the 
                    ( print page 16264)
                    factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: March 8, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-6720 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Monty JACOMINE.

No. 87-KK-0083.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 12, 1987.

In re Jacomine, Monty; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 315-930; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-6695.

Denied. The application is untimely.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2351 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Rhenogran Geniplex-70. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Rhenogran 

Geniplex-70. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RHENOGRAN GENIPLEX-70. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.76 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Rhenogran Geniplex-70) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2351 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 23 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 23

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1999

   Mr. Lott submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
                        considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and the 
                       House of Representatives.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, March 25, 1999, Friday, March 26, 1999, Saturday, March 27, 
1999, or Sunday, March 28, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 12, 1999, or until 
such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 25, 1999, 
or Friday, March 26, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 12, 1999, for morning-hour 
debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
                                 <all>
```
#### Betty J. DURHAM, a/k/a Betty Joyce Durham, Appellant, v. NCNB NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 88-1012.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

July 22, 1988.

C. Geoffrey Yining of C. Geoffrey Vin-ing, P.A., and A.H. Lane, Lakeland, for appellant.

William M. Midyette, III of Harris, Mi-dyette & Clements, P.A., Lakeland, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

The parties have stipulated that the circuit court’s judgment must be reversed in view of the Florida Supreme Court’s recent decision in *Public Health Trust of Dade County v. Lopez*and *In Re: Estate of Taylor,*531 So.2d 946 (Fla.1988). In accordance with the parties’ stipulation and the supreme court’s decision, we reverse and remand for entry of a judgment consistent with the holding in *Public Health Trust of Dade County.*

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498 

### APR 1 7 2006



### MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: FROM:



### TO: Clean Fuel FleetProgram Requirements /**(&.~_** 

# d LeilaH. Cook, Group**Manag~~** Transportation & Regional Programs Division AirProgram Managers OFFICEOF AIR AND RADIATION

This will be ofinterestto you only ifone ofyour states has aClean Fuel Fleet Program approved in their SIP. EPA's Clean Fuel FleetProgram (CFFP) was establishedbythe 1990 Clean Air Act amendments to reduce emissions in metropolitan areas not meetingFederal air quality standards including the then-new 1-hour standard for ozone. It shouldbe noted that underthe Clean Air Act's section 110(1) anti-backsliding provisions, andEPA's 1-hour anti-backsliding regulations at 40 CFR Subpart X, section 51.900 etseq., the CFFP is considered an "applicable requirement." As such, despite revocation ofthe 1-hourozone standard, the requirement to implement a CFFP remains until such time as the area in question attains the 8-hour ozone standard. Since the time the CFFPrequirementbecame law, EPA has promulgated new vehicle emission standards that are generally more stringent than, or equivalent to, the Clean-Fuel Vehicle (CFV) emission standards for light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, and heavy-duty vehicles and engines. These new EPAregulations also added a new medium-duty vehicle passenger class, and created a new chassis test procedure for heavy-duty vehicles. On July 21, 2005, EPAissued a "DearManufacturer" letter- CCD-05-12 (attached) regarding Clean-Fuel Vehicle Standards to provide guidance on determining the equivalency of vehicle and engine emission standards in Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR) Part 86 and Part 88 for Clean-Fuel Vehicles. The above-referencedEPA letter establishes current Part 86 emission standards which EPA has determined to be as or more stringent than correspondingPart 88 CFV**~mission** standards. The comparison addresses Tier 2 vehicles (LDVs, LDTs, and MDPVs), and 2005 and later model year heavy-duty vehicles (including 8,501-10,000 GVWR and 10,001-14,000 GVWR Otto-cycle chassis certified), heavy duty Otto cycle engines, and heavy-duty diesel engines. (See the Determination section, page 2 ofthe attached letter). To meet the requirements ofthe Clean Fuel FleetProgram fleet managers can be assured that vehicles and 

## @ Printed on Recycled Paper2 engines certifiedto current Part 86 emission standards, which EPA has determined to be as or more stringent than corresponding CFV emission standards perthe attachedEPA Dear ManufacturerLettermeet CFV emission standards and CFFP requirements as defined in CFR Part 88. Such vehicles do not require a separate CFFcertification or CFF label to qualify to participate in the CFFprogram. Thus, such vehicles are CFFcompliant and are available to satisfy CFF SIP obligations. This memorandum supersedes an earlierEPA memorandum dated July 2, 2004. This earlier memorandum was also focused on addressing CFFP requirements and the new Tier 2 emissions standards.

Attachment
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
            February
      11, 2011
            By:
            /s/ Xu
      KechengName:
            Xu
      KechengTitle:
            President,
      Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive
      Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 12921-002 and 14076-000]

      ( print page 2287)    
                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Mississippi River, in Tensas Parish, Louisiana, and Jefferson County Mississippi. The applications were filed by FFP Project 32, LLC for Project No. 12921-002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14076-000.                

                    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-690 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
4.2


 


Description
of the Registrant’s Securities Registered


Pursuant
to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


 


The
following description is a description of the Registrant’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.


 


As
of November 23, 2020, the Registrant has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), its Common Stock.


 


The
following is a summary of information concerning capital stock of the Registrant. The summaries and descriptions below do not
purport to be complete statements of the relevant provisions of the Registrant’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as amended, (the “Charter”) and Bylaws of the Registrant (the “By-Laws”), and are entirely
qualified by these documents.


 


Common
Stock


 


Authorized
Shares. The Registrant is authorized to issue up to four billion (4,000,000,000) shares of Common Stock.


 


Dividends.
Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to
receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally
available for the payment of dividends.


 


Voting
Rights. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote per share on matters voted on by the stockholders.


 


Liquidation
Rights. Subject to any preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably
in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution. As of November 23, 2020, holders
of 124,376 shares of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock have the right to receive a liquidation preference equal to $6.00 per
share prior to any distribution or payment to the holders of the Common Stock and pari passu with the Series E Stock and 47,977
shares of Series E Stock have the right to receive a liquidation preference equal to $13.34 per share prior to any distribution
or payment to the holders of the Common Stock and pari passu with the Series D Stock.


 


Other
Rights. The shares of Common Stock are not subject to redemption by operation of a sinking fund or otherwise. Holders of shares
of Common Stock are not currently entitled to pre-emptive rights.


 


Fully
Paid. The issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock are fully paid and non-assessable. This means the full purchase price
for the outstanding shares of Common Stock has been paid and the holders of such shares will not be assessed any additional amounts
for such shares.


 


Listing.
The Common Stock is quoted on the OTC Pink market under the symbol “TLSS”.
Exhibit 8

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES

Smith & Nephew plc

Subsidiary Undertakings



|                                        |  |                         
|--------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Company                                 |  | Country of Incorporation
|ArthroCare Corporation                  |  | United States           
|Smith & Nephew (Overseas) Limited       |  | England & Wales         
|Smith & Nephew Consolidated, Inc.       |  | United States           
|Smith & Nephew Finance Holdings Limited |  | Cayman Islands          
|Smith & Nephew Finance S.a.r.l.         |  | Luxembourg              
|Smith & Nephew Management B.V.          |  | Netherlands             
|Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG          |  | Switzerland             
|Smith & Nephew Pte Limited              |  | Singapore               
|Smith & Nephew USD Limited              |  | England & Wales         
|Smith & Nephew, Inc.                    |  | United States           
|T. J. Smith and Nephew, Limited         |  | England & Wales         
|TP Limited                              |  | Scotland                

All companies trade under the name of Smith & Nephew and deal with Medical Device products.
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc.
Brentwood, New York

           We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in Registration
Statements on Form S-8,  Registration  Numbers  33-65020 and  33-65022,  both as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on June 25,  1993,  and
Registration  Number  333-22545,  as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on February  28,  1997,  and to the  inclusion in the Allou Health &
Beauty Care, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1998
of our  report  dated  June  18,  1998  related  to the  consolidated  financial
statements and schedules of Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. and subsidiaries.


/s/ Mayer Rispler & Company, P.C.

Mayer Rispler & Company, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

June 29, 1998
New York, New York
Order entered January 7, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01057-CR

ROY OLIVER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-18595-V

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s January 3, 2019 motion for an extension of time to file his 

brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due by March 8, 2019. 

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2142 

To extend the duty suspension on 2-Methylhydroquinone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on 2-Methylhydroquinone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-METHYLHYDROQUINONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.36 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Methylhydroquinone) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2142 IS

1 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**107 CAF 13-01834**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF JONATHAN M. AND JOSHUA V.-F.-H.

------------------------------------ ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SERVICES, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; DANIELLE F., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (BENJAMIN M. YAUS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. SUSAN B. MARRIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, MANLIUS.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Michael L. Hanuszczak, J.), entered September 24, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order, among other things, terminated respondent’s parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject children to petitioner. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Same memorandum as in Matter of Dakota H. (___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 20, 2015]).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court