alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14


           Schedule to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
                  of DQE for the quarter ended March 31, 1997
                                        


A Severance Agreement which was substantially identical to that filed as
Exhibit 10.1 was entered into with the following party, materially differing
only as follows:



     Other Party            Material Differences
     -----------            --------------------

     William J. DeLeo      "Severance Benefit" under Section 3a:
                           aggregate lump sum payment of $284,416; no
                           additional lump sum amount payable if
                           terminated prior to June 30, 1999.
SALARY TABLE 2010-GS 

INCORPORATING THE 1.50% GENERAL SCHEDULE INCREASE 

EFFECTIVE JANUARY 2010 

Hourly Basic (B) Rates by Grade and Step 

Hourly Overtime (O) Rates by Grade and Step 

Grade B/0 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7 Step 8 Step 9 Step 10 

1 B $ 8.53 $ 8.82 $ 9.10 $ 9.38 $ 9.67 $ 9.83 $ 10.11 $ 10.39 $ 10.41 $ 10.67 

O 12.80 13.23 13.65 14.07 14.51 14.75 15.17 15.59 15.62 16.01 

2 B 9.59 9.82 10.14 10.41 10.52 10.83 11.14 11.45 11.76 12.07 

O 14.39 14.73 15.21 15.62 15.78 16.25 16.71 17.18 17.64 18.11 

3 B 10.46 10.81 11.16 11.51 11.86 12.21 12.56 12.91 13.26 13.60 

O 15.69 16.22 16.74 17.27 17.79 18.32 18.84 19.37 19.89 20.40 

4 B 11.75 12.14 12.53 12.92 13.31 13.71 14.10 14.49 14.88 15.27 

O 17.63 18.21 18.80 19.38 19.97 20.57 21.15 21.74 22.32 22.91 

5 B 13.14 13.58 14.02 14.46 14.90 15.33 15.77 16.21 16.65 17.09 

O 19.71 20.37 21.03 21.69 22.35 23.00 23.66 24.32 24.98 25.64 

6 B 14.65 15.14 15.63 16.12 16.60 17.09 17.58 18.07 18.56 19.05 

O 21.98 22.71 23.45 24.18 24.90 25.64 26.37 27.11 27.84 28.58 

7 B 16.28 16.82 17.37 17.91 18.45 19.00 19.54 20.08 20.62 21.17 

O 24.42 25.23 26.06 26.87 27.68 28.50 29.31 30.12 30.93 31.76 

8 B 18.03 18.63 19.23 19.83 20.43 21.04 21.64 22.24 22.84 23.44 

O 27.05 27.95 28.85 29.75 30.65 31.56 32.46 32.90 32.90 32.90 

9 B 19.92 20.58 21.24 21.91 22.57 23.23 23.90 24.56 25.22 25.89 

O 29.88 30.87 31.86 32.87 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 

10 B 21.93 22.66 23.39 24.13 24.86 25.59 26.32 27.05 27.78 28.51 

O 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 

11 B 24.10 24.90 25.70 26.50 27.31 28.11 28.91 29.72 30.52 31.32 

O 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 

12 B 28.88 29.84 30.81 31.77 32.73 33.69 34.66 35.62 36.58 37.54 

O 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 32.90 33.69 34.66 35.62 36.58 37.54 

13 B 34.34 35.49 36.63 37.78 38.92 40.07 41.21 42.36 43.50 44.65 

O 34.34 35.49 36.63 37.78 38.92 40.07 41.21 42.36 43.50 44.65 

14 B 40.58 41.94 43.29 44.64 45.99 47.35 48.70 50.05 51.40 52.76 

O 40.58 41.94 43.29 44.64 45.99 47.35 48.70 50.05 51.40 52.76 

15 B 47.74 49.33 50.92 52.51 54.10 55.69 57.29 58.88 60.47 62.06 

O 47.74 49.33 50.92 52.51 54.10 55.69 57.29 58.88 60.47 62.06
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-41372

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL RAMOS-HERNANDEZ, also known as Camerino Lopez-Lopez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-638-1

Before JOLLY, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul RamosHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramos-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-41372 Document: 00513158836 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
No. 14-41372

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-41372 Document: 00513158836 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 138

Expressing the sense of Congress that a day of peace and sharing should 
             be established at the beginning of each year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2000

 Mr. Wellstone (for himself, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Moynihan, 
    Mr. Reid, and Ms. Landrieu) submitted the following concurrent 
    resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that a day of peace and sharing should 
             be established at the beginning of each year.

Whereas human progress in the 21st century will depend upon global understanding 
        and cooperation in finding positive solutions to hunger and violence;
Whereas the turn of the millennium offers unparalleled opportunity for humanity 
        to examine its past, set goals for the future, and establish new 
        patterns of behavior;
Whereas the people of the United States and the world observed the day 
        designated by the United Nations General Assembly as ``One Day in Peace, 
        January 1, 2000'' (General Assembly Resolution 54/29);
Whereas the example set on that day ought to be recognized globally and repeated 
        each year;
Whereas the people of the United States seek to establish better relations with 
        one another and with the people of all countries; and
Whereas celebration by the breaking of bread together traditionally has been the 
        means by which individuals, societies, and nations join together in 
        peace: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) each year should begin with a day of peace and sharing 
        during which--
                    (A) people around the world should gather with 
                family, friends, neighbors, their faith community, or 
                people of another culture to pledge nonviolence in the 
                new year and to share in a celebratory new year meal; 
                and
                    (B) Americans who are able should match or multiply 
                the cost of their new year meal with a timely gift to 
                the hungry at home or abroad in a tangible 
                demonstration of a desire for increased friendship and 
                sharing among people around the world; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation each year 
        calling on the people of the United States and interested 
        organizations to observe such a day with appropriate programs 
        and activities.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 15 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 15

  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                prohibit retroactive increases in taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 18, 1999

Mr. Coverdell introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
  Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to 
                prohibit retroactive increases in taxes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission by the Congress:

                              ``Article--

    ``Section 1. No new Federal tax, and no increase in a Federal tax, 
shall take effect before the date of enactment of the new tax or 
increase.
    ``Section 2. This article takes effect on the date of its 
ratification.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.35


 


Extension
To Kraig T. Higginson Promissory Note/LOC


 


Reference
is made to the Promissory note by and between the undersigned parties, Sundance Strategies, Inc. and Kraig T. Higginson, said
note originally dated July 22, 2015, subsequently extended to August 31, 2021.


 


Be
it known, that for good consideration the parties made the following additions or changes to said contract as if contained therein:


 


	 	1.	Total
    amount of the promissory note/line of credit to be increased to an amount not to exceed $4,600,000.
	 	2.	Due
    date for the note is extended to the earlier of November 30, 2022 or at the time when the anticipated additional raise of
    funds is successful.
	 	3.	As
    consideration for extending this note, Kraig T. Higginson will receive 679,400 warrant shares of Sundance Strategies, Inc.
    stock. The warrant price will be $.05 per share with a 5 year exercise period from the date of this note extension. The Company
    will have no obligation to register these shares.


 


All
other terms and provisions shall remain in full force and effect.


 


	Sundance
    Strategies, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	 	
	 
	By:	Randall
    F. Pearson, It’s President	 
	 	 	 
	Kraig
    T. Higginson	 
	 	 	 
	 	
	 
	By:	Kraig
    T. Higginson	 
	 	 	 
	Signed
    this 27th day of October, 2020.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 18

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. ASHCROFT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Finance

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is and should continue to be to encourage homeownership;
2

•SCON 18 IS

Whereas the increase in the cost of housing over the last 10

years has been greater than the increase in family income;

Whereas, for the first time in 50 years, the percentage of

people in the United States owning their own homes has

declined;

Whereas the percentage of people in the United States between the ages of 25 and 29 who own their own home

has declined from 43 percent in 1976 to 38 percent

today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of many communities;

Whereas the continued deductibility of interest paid on debt

secured by a first or second home has particular importance in promoting other desirable social goals, such as

education of young people; and

Whereas the Federal income tax deduction for interest paid

on debt secured by a first or second home has been limited twice in the last 6 years, and was further eroded as

a result of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of

1990: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that the

3 current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on
3

•SCON 18 IS

1 debt secured by a first or second home should not be fur2 ther restricted.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; RFA-RM-12-001 & RFA-RM-11-022: Microphysiological Systems 
Review.
    Date: April 19-20, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Raymond Jacobson, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5858, MSC 7849, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-996-7702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3d9d2d0dcd1c0dcddc1dbf3d0c0c19ddddadb9dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bcb7b5b9b4a5b9b8a4be96b5a5a4f8b8bfbef8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; FIRCA and GRIP in Behavioral/Social Sciences.
    Date: April 19, 2012.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 
6087, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Lisa Steele, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
PSE IRG, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3139, MSC 7770, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-594-6594, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63101706060f060f0d230010114d0d0a0b4d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4d7d0c1c1c8c1c8cae4c7d7d68acacdcc8ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-7251 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CONDOMINIUMS ON THE INTRACOASTAL ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant, v. BARNETT BANK OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 87-0984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Daniel S. Rosenbaum of Becker, Polia-koff & Streitfeld, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Lisa A. Miller and James Patrick Garrity of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Sheehan, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of an order denying its motion to disburse sale proceeds from a judicial sale after foreclosure. Our review of the record shows that this court does not have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 9.130, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Further, we decline to treat this appeal in the alternative as a petition for writ of certiorari. The matter does not qualify for such treatment because appellant will have a full and adequate remedy on plenary appeal. *Capricorn Marble Co. v. George Hyman Construction Co.,*462 So.2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985).

DISMISSED.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
#### James THOMAS Jr., and Brenda Thomas v. K-MART CORPORATION.

No. 88-C-0518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1988.

In re K-Mart Corporation; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, CA87-0031; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 854756.

Prior report: La.App., 525 So.2d 24.

Denied.

CALOGERO and COLE, JJ., would grant the writ.
**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | 1. | The                Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of                section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                                                                                                                                                      |                                                   |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  May 18, 2007 |                                                                                                                                                                 | /s/                John                S. Kovach  |
|                                | John                S. Kovach                                                                                                                                             |
|                                | Chief                  Executive Officer and Chief                  Financial Officer (Principal                  financial and accounting                  officer) |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 2402** 

KIMBERLY LEE, on behalf of KJL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Orangeburg
. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 5:14

- cv - 01356

- JMC )

Submitted : April 29, 2016 Decided: May 18, 2016

Before WYNN and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kimberly Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding prece dent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
K imberly Lee , on behalf of her minor daughter KJL , appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income (SSI)
. * We ha ve reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin
. , No. 5:14

- cv - 01356

- JMC (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015)
. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Although we previously have recognized “that non

- attorney parents generally may not litigate the claims of their minor children in federal court,” Myers v. Loudoun Cty. Pub. Sch. , 418 F.3d 395, 401 (4th Cir. 2005), we conclude that Lee is authorized to litigate KJL’s claims in the circumstances presented by this appeal from the administrative denial of SSI benefits, see A dams ex rel. D.J.W. v. Astrue , 659 F.3d 1297, 1301 (10th Cir. 2011); Machadio v. Apfel , 276 F.3d 103, 107 (2d Cir. 20 02); Harris v. Apfel , 209 F.3d 413, 417 (5th Cir. 2000).
#### Lawrence L. LAGARDE, Jr. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 87-C-2560.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Lagarde, Lawrence L. Jr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0300; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 313-733.

Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 1147.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135847(11) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

BILLY JOE HICKMAN, Justices 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 135847 

 AGC: 2613/07, 2614/07 

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 28, 

2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0721 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 29, 2008 

 Clerk
#### STATE ex rel. John GRAY, Jr. a/k/a Lionel Jenkins v. CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FOR the PARISH OF ORLEANS, et al. and Clerk of Court for the Parish of Orleans.

No. 87-KH-0129.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Gray, John Jr. a/k/a; Jenkins, Lionel; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 241-091.

Granted. See order in 87-KH-0126.