alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16818-16819]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6884]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army

[Docket ID USA-2012-0005]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records; Correction

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to Delete Fifteen Systems of Records; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 7, 2012 (77 FR 13571-13573) DoD published a notice 
announcing its intent to delete fifteen Department of the Army Privacy 
Act System of Records Notices. One of the system deletions had an 
incorrect ``Reason'' paragraph. This notice provides a corrected 
``Reason'' paragraph for the deletion of A0600-8-104b AHRC, Official 
Military Personnel Record (August 18, 2004, 69 FR 51271).

[[Page 16819]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Leroy Jones, Jr., Department of 
the Army, Privacy Office, U.S. Army Records Management and 
Declassification Agency, 7701 Telegraph Road, Casey Building, Suite 
144, Alexandria, VA 22315-3827 or by phone at 703-428-6185.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ``Reason'' paragraph for the deletion of 
A0600-8-104b AHRC, Official Military Personnel Record (August 18, 2004, 
69 FR 51271) should have identified the Privacy Act Systems of Records 
Notice that now covers these active records. These records are active 
and covered under A0600-8-104 AHRC, Military Personnel Records Jacket 
Files (MPRJ) (January 6, 2004, 69 FR 790).

Correction

    In the notice (FR Doc. 2012-5516) published on March 7, 2012 (77 FR 
13571-13573), on page 13572, in the third column, for SORN A0600-8-104b 
AHRC, revise the ``Reason'' paragraph to read as follows:

Reason:

    These records are active and covered under system of records notice 
A0600-8-104 AHRC, Military Personnel Records Jacket Files (MPRJ) 
(January 6, 2004, 69 FR 790). Records are transferred to the National 
Personnel Records Center when the NARA retention has been met.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-6884 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Aerial Anthropology LLC

DJI PHANTOM SPECIFICATIONS
Aerial Anthropology LLC
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Solo

Flight Safety 

Drones can be hazardous if operated incorrectly. If you are new to drones, we 

recommend learning on a mini-drone to first learn the ropes. Make safety 

your first priority, and always follow these best practices. 

Maintain Altitudes Under 400 ft. 

Never fly above 400 ft. (120 m), doing so places you in restricted airspace 

that can interfere with manned aircraft. 
Proper Handling 

Spinning propellers can cause serious injury; always disarm before handling 

the propellers. It is important to make sure that you and any spectators keep a 

safe distance from the drone. Don’t take off with the drone facing towards 

you or fly directly over your head. 

Never fly within 5 miles of any airport. 

To prevent conflict between your drone and manned aircraft, always fly at 

least five miles (eight kilometers) away from all airports and other locations 

where manned aircraft are in use. Research your area to find all areas of 

restricted airspace near you. 
Never fly above people. 

Avoid flying above people at all costs. Always maintain at least 100 feet (30 

meters) between your drone and people, vehicles, and buildings. This rule is 

important for flying near crowds, buildings, and roads due to potential 

hazards from unplanned landings. 

Keep clear of stadiums. 

Recently mandated by the FAA, drones and other unmanned aircraft are 

strictly forbidden from flying near or above stadiums. 
Avoid inclement weather. 

Flying in inclement weather will result in abnormal flight behavior. It is best 

to wait for calm skies to avoid damaging your drone and surrounding 

property.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 YEAR TO DATE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,394
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,378
<INVENTORY>                                      2,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,954
<PP&E>                                         634,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                 179,193
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 549,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           66,166
<BONDS>                                        226,776
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           312
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   549,875
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               729,042
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  701,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,794
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,856
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,856
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
<FN>
<F1>PROVISION FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS INCLUDED IN COSTS ANS EXPENSES APPLICABLE TO
REVENUES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Regulatory Evaluation f4:C.o ..:!{:. 2 0 l Lf - / 0 { 

2. ILf- N M - / --Ab 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

llrou make clullzges to the values in !lie table bdow. you must ensur<! the totals upda!e accordingly ll 

!hey do not, click (or Tah) i11to wui !hen out of!he changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 120.0 $0 65 

I 

i ll{) 

t t; 

' 0 

' 

' ' 

\ 

"' I 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $663,000 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Pmts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Repair 15.0 10,000 

' 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ' 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 0 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. -

YES D NO IZI 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspottation? • 

YES* D NO IZI 

*Explanation:
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October
              23, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
              M.
              CancioHugo
              M. CancioTitle:
              Principal Executive
              Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 Agreement Executive Company Mobile Services
  
 Position; Term; Condition Precedent; Responsibilities Commencement Date Termination Date Section 1.1 Employment
Period Boards
 Faithful Performance




---



##### 



Basic Compensation Base Salary Section 2.1 Basic Compensation pro rata Article 3
 Discretionary Incentive Compensation Compensation Committee pro rata Article 3 Holdings
 Other Employee Benefits
 Expense Reimbursements
  2




---



##### 



Events of Termination
 Termination for Cause, Breach of Article 4 or Voluntary Termination Cause
 Section 3.1(a) Section 2.1 Accrued Salary pro rata Section 2.2 Discretionary
Bonus Prorated Annual Bonus Section 2.4
 Termination for Disability, Without Cause, or for Good Reason Disability
  3




---



##### 



Section 3.1(b) Section 2.4 Section 2.1 Continuing Salary COBRA COBRA Benefits Section 4.1
 Termination for Death Section 2.4 Section 2.3 Eligible Family Members
 Definitions of Certain Terms
 Cause
 Designated Successors
 Disability
 Good Reason
  4




---



##### 



provided
  
 Non-Competition
 Non-Competition Period
  WCAS X WCAS Company
Business
  provided however
  5




---



##### 



Section 4.1(a)
 Sections 4.1(a) 4.1(b) Sections 4.1(a) 4.1(b) Sections 4.1(a) 4.1(b) Sections 4.1(a) 4.1(b)
 Section 4.1(b)
 Repurchase Section 4.1
  Section 4.1 Section 4.1
  6




---



##### 



Notices
  7




---



##### 



Survival Sections 3.1 4.1
 Authority; No Conflict
 Assignment and Succession
 Headings
 Tax Withholding
 Applicable Law
 Waiver
  8




---



##### 



Amendment or Modification
 Counterparts
 Entire Agreement
  9




---



##### 



EXECUTIVEJeffry E. JonesCOMPANYMOBILE STORAGE GROUP, INC.By:Name: Christopher A. WilsonTitle: General Counsel & Assistant SecretaryMOBILE SERVICESMOBILE SERVICES GROUP, INC.By:Name: Christopher A. WilsonTitle: General Counsel & Assistant Secretary
R-330 

April 15, 1947 

.. . 

Hon. Ra 

K 

Iackey opia~oa No. v-146 

county udltor 

Yoakum County Re: Iavful right of a person 

Plains, Texas to hold the oiflces of 

city’ councl1man and ju8- 

tice of the peace at the 

Bear Sli: same time. 

Yarrr inquiry under date OS April 3, 1947, 

solicits an opinion of this departmeat on the question: 

"Cau a city couaclbaaa. the vas slec-, 

ted by tha people of an incorporatad city 

serve as jwtlce of the peace vhsn ha i,” 

appo2att;aa by the commlsslont’rs ’ ootart? 

Olty councilmen and justlces~ of the peace are 

sot authorized to perform the samC ,klnd ~of ssrvi448; 

~nelther OS them have any right to direct or review (Iorvlaes performed by th4 other; so there is nothing iEc4mpat lble in the perf’ormance of the duties of’ said offloes. 

The pertlneat part OS Section 40 OS Article 

KVI. of the CoPstltut Ion of Texas is as SoLlo~s : 

“Ho person shall hold or exercise, at 

the same tine, more than one civil off100 

of emoluwat , except Just Ice of the ?4ac4& 

County Commieslouer,: Notary Publib . . . _~. 

That section of the Constltut Ion, aa It pertains to the osslce of Just ice of the Peace is ia the 

In 1856 the Supremb 60-t mid, 

16"Jb: 59: 

: . . . : aIt 18 clear, therefore, ~that tVo civil 

oiflaes of emolument canuot be unltifi In the 

.; ,.. 

: In 1890 the Supreme Court cited th4 Pow411 

OIs6 with approval .in paal va. Tovumll(a, 77 %x. 464, 
- . . 

Hon. F&J Iackey, Page 2, V-146 

14 s. w. 365, in which the Court _ agaia decided that one 

person may hoid more than one office of emolumnt at 

the same tlms IS one of such offices be that of justice 

of the peace. In that aase, Gaal vas one of the elected 

couatg commlssloners af El Paso County and accepted the 

ofilce of mayor OS the incorporate% town of TaUta. 9!he 

Suprem CorPt decided tYrat, under the Ooaatltutioa, Gaal 

could 1avfuUy hold the oiflces OS cwnty coswnlasioMr 

OS i!l Paso Oountf and mayor OS fslata at the sama time; 

ths court said: 

n 

. . . the wade . . . iW&oata that 

It vaa intended that a pep 

~Opinion Boa. O-382, 0-2Ofj~, o-2284 an& O-6524 

OS this department conetausd the 1afiguage of go&Ion 40 

OS Article XVI OS the cbfwtftutlofl. We smlos4 a copy 

OS ikaah OS tboso oplaloar for y0ur i&mnat ten. 

Ys are OS the opiuion thult a psrsoa may hold. 

the offloes OS city aeurraflmia an% jnutlaa d the maas 

at the afme t’im. 

A person may ho113 the oSSi~a of blk~ 

a0uacllmaa and justice OS the pea08 at the 

aam ttas under sprclSi0 pmolslona of +A. 

XV& Sea. 40, OS t&B Texar Qrrartitutfon. 

Pour8 very truly, 

:&TTeaimz - 6P l!ssAa 

WTWral:%r:ra*j
From: Peter Roos [mailto:roos@bridgerphotonics.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 6:38 PM

To: A-AND-R-DOCKET; Docket@epa.gov

Cc: Thorpe, Michael

Subject: Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505

Dear EPA,

Bridger Photonics, Inc. wishes to alert the EPA to new methane detection and 

imaging technology that is under development at our company and funded by 

the DOE. We are developing optical gas imaging (OGI) technology that is 

based on laser wavelength modulation spectroscopy rather than the traditional 

infrared camera OGI. The anticipated benefits of this technology are:

1. Remote detection that doesn't require physical contact with the gas like 

Method 21 instruments (e.g., organic vapor analyzers, flame ionization 

detectors).

2. 3D terrestrial maps/imagery with gas concentration overlays (which is not 

provided by camera OGI) 3. Mobile detection, either ground-based or 

airborne, with automated scan paths 4. Geo-location of data products to 

enable repeatable and verifiable scans 5. Rapid scans covering >100 m^2 in 

under 5 minutes 6. High gas concentration sensitivity (<10 ppm-m for distances 

up to 50

meters) which is estimated to be more than an order of magnitude better than 

camera OGI.

7. No sensitivity to background or thermal radiation, unlike camera OGI.

If you have any questions or would like additional information on this 

technology, please contact us at info@bridgerphotonics.com

Best regards,

Pete

--

Dr. Peter Roos

Chief Executive Officer

Bridger Photonics, Inc.

2310 University Way, Bldg 4-4

Bozeman, MT 59715

----------------------------
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-60983) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 1989 Incentive Stock
Option Plan, Amended and Restated 1990 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, Directors
Fee Stock Option Plan and Employment Agreement with Bruce D. Benson of United
States Exploration, Inc. of our report dated March 20, 2000, except for Notes 2
and 17 as to which the date is March 28, 2000, with respect to the 1999
consolidated financial statements of United States Exploration, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1999.


Denver, Colorado                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
April 13, 2000
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joseph Floyd CARMOUCHE.

No. 89-KD-1498.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Carmouche, Joseph Floyd; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-318-D.

Denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ALVARO DOMARCO

- SANCHEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 10 498

D.C. No. 2:94

- cr

- 00251

- GEB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 26, 2016 **

Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Alvaro Domarco

- Sanch ez appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We

have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Domarco

- Sanchez contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 1 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 10498

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We review de n ovo whether a

district court had authority to modify a sentence under sec tion 3582(c)(2). S ee

United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 672 (9th Cir. 2009). T he district court

correctly concl uded that Domarco

- Sanchez is ineligible for a sentence reduction

because Amendment 782 did not lower his applicable sentencing range. See 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); Leniear , 574 F.3d at 673

- 74 . Because the district court

lacked authority to reduce Domarco

- Sanchez’s sentence, it had no cause to

consider the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See Dillon v. United States , 560 U.S.

817, 826

- 27 (2010).

To the extent that Domarco

- Sanchez seeks to challenge his sentence as

procedura l l y erroneous and substantively unreasonable, these claims are not

cognizable in a section 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See Dillon , 560 U.S. at 831

( section 3582(c)(2) does not permit a plenary resentencing proceeding).

AFFIRMED.
#### W.D. RICHARDS, et ux. v. Dorman D. LACOUR.

No. 88-C-0063.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Richards, W.D.; Richards, Helen Dix; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-1005; Parish of Grant, 35th Judicial District Court, No. 5635.

Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 813.

Denied.

COLE, J., would grant the writ.
#### A.F. BLAIR COMPANY, INC. v. K. Gerald HAYDEL, M.D. and American Bank & Trust Company.

No. 88-C-3070.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re A.F. Blair Co. Inc.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA87 1028; Parish of Terrebonne, 32nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 76011.

Prior report: La.App., 533 So.2d 1022.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. George D. YARBROUGH v. Hon. G. Walton CAIRE, Judge, 40th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist.

No. 87-KH-0139.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Yarbrough, George D.; applying for writ of mandamus; Parish of St. John the Baptist, 40th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 15965.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Armando BATISTA, Jr.

No. 88-KH-3000.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Batista, Armando Jr.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 306-525.

Granted in part; denied in part. Relator’s request for free copies of documents is denied for failure to show a particularized need. Relator’s request for cost estimates for the documents he seeks is granted for the sole purpose of transferring the matter to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to provide relator with the information he seeks.
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of Highbury
Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned hereby certify that, to the best
of the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant for the period certified.








Date:
April 29, 2009




By:
              /s/ Richard S. FooteRichard
      S. FootePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




By:
              /s/ R. Bradley ForthR.
      Bradley ForthExecutive
      Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand
      Secretary

                  (Principal
      Financial Officer)


The
foregoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to Highbury Financial Inc. and will be retained
by Highbury Financial Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.