alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136571 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136571 

 COA: 284025 

Kent CC: 06-012314-FH 

ALBERT THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

___________

No. 95-2491

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Roman F. Siqueiros, also known *

as Silverado, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 7, 1995

 Filed: December 18, 1995

___________

Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Roman F. Siqueiros challenges the 100-month sentence imposed by the

district court after he pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to 1

possess with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. We affirm.

For sentencing purposes, Siqueiros stipulated he managed or

supervised at least five individuals engaged in criminal activity, within

the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1. On appeal, Siqueiros argues the district

court erred in imposing an aggravating-role enhancement, as he did not

profit from his criminal activity and thus the enhancement conflicts with

commentary to section 3B1.1.
-2-

We review for clear error the district court's factual finding of

Siqueiros's role in the offense. See United States v. Skorniak, 59 F.3d

750, 757 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 64 U.S.L.W. 3348 (U.S. Nov. 13,

1995). Notwithstanding that "persons who exercise a supervisory or

managerial role . . . [may] tend to profit more from it," the enhancement

"is included primarily because of concerns about relative responsibility."

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment. (backg'd). The fact that Siqueiros may not have

profited from his activity does not preclude application of the

enhancement; profit is only one factor the district court should consider.

Cf. United States v. Farah, 991 F.2d 1065, 1070 (2d Cir. 1993) (Sentencing

Commission relegated profit factor to "no better than secondary importance"

for purposes of determining defendant's aggravating role). Siqueiros's

offense conduct--as described in his presentence report--adequately

supports the conclusion that he managed or supervised criminal activity

involving at least five participants. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b). We

conclude the district court did not clearly err in applying the

enhancement.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Robert CODE, Jr.

No. 87-KK-2590.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 3, 1987.

In re Code, Nathaniel Robert Jr.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 138860; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19654-KW.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE FINANCE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 24, 2010
            /s/
      Jing XieJing
      XieChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2005 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
SCPR-15-0000605

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

IN RE GREGORY J. COLUCCI, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner Gregory J. Colucci’s

petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in

the State of Hawai#i, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and of the

affidavits and exhibits in support thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), 

that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Petitioner Gregory J. Colucci, attorney number 6030, from

the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai#i, effective with the

filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, September 22, 2015.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-15-0000605

22-SEP-2015

08:59 AM
February 26, 2013 Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office des transports du Canada

Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation X40, suite 6402 400 7th Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Dear Mr. Gretch Reference: OST 2006-24269 Canadian Transportation Agency

File M4820/U5-19

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by US air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada in accordance withthe provisions ofthe Air Transport Agreement Between Canada and the United States ofAmerica, signed March 12, 2007 and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to that Agreement, on the basis ofcomity and reciprocity.
Manager International Agreements

cc Brian Hedberg Office ofInternational Aviation Martin Loken, ANA Marc Rioux, ACEA..

Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 www.otc.gc.ca Ottawa Ontario K1A ON9 www.cta.gc.ca 

# Canada
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. SaraWilliams, Treasurer and Principal
Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.





Date:
September 29, 2008








/s/ Sara
Williams


Sara
Williams


Treasurer
(principal financial officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 43

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, July 1, 1999, Fri4 day, July 2, 1999, or Saturday, July 3, 1999, on a motion

5 offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Ma6 jority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or ad7 journed until noon on Monday, July 12, 1999, or until

8 such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority

9 Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn,

10 or until noon on the second day after Members are notified
2

SCON 43 ATS

1 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res2 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House

3 adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, July 1, 1999,

4 or Friday, July 2, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant

5 to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

6 designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday,

7 July 12, 1999, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on

8 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

9 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which10 ever occurs first.

11 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

12 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

13 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

14 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen15 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

16 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. Dennis R. WIGGINS v. STATE of Louisiana, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 87-KH-2068.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 29, 1987.

In re Wiggins, Dennis R.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 319-077.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the district court for prompt consideration.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 19

Concerning anti-Semitic statements made by members of the Duma of the

Russian Federation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 17, 1999

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, Mr.

ABRAHAM, Mr. BROWNBACK, Mr. REID, Mr. BURNS, Mr. TORRICELLI,

Mr. CLELAND, and Mr. FEINGOLD) submitted the following concurrent

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Concerning anti-Semitic statements made by members of the

Duma of the Russian Federation.

Whereas the world has seen in the 20th century the disastrous results of ethnic, religious, and racial intolerance;

Whereas the Government of the Russian Federation is on

record, through obligations freely accepted as a participating state of the Organization on Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), as pledging to ‘‘clearly and

equivocally condemn totalitarianism, racial and ethnic hatred, anti-Semitism, xenophobia and discrimination

against anyone . . .’’;
2

•SCON 19 IS

Whereas at two public rallies in October 1998, Communist

Party member of the Duma, Albert Makashov, blamed

‘‘the Yids’’ for Russia’s current problems;

Whereas in November 1998, attempts by members of the

Russian Duma to formally censure Albert Makashov were

blocked by members of the Communist Party;

Whereas in December 1998, the chairman of the Duma Security Committee and Communist Party member, Viktor

Ilyukhin, blamed President Yeltsin’s ‘‘Jewish entourage’’

for alleged ‘‘genocide against the Russian people’’;

Whereas in response to the public outcry over the abovenoted anti-Semitic statements, Communist Party chairman Gennadi Zyuganov claimed in December 1998 that

such statements were a result of ‘‘confusion’’ between Zionism and ‘‘the Jewish question’’; and

Whereas during the Soviet era, the Communist Party leadership regularly used ‘‘anti-Zionist campaigns’’ as an excuse to persecute and discriminate against Jews in the

Soviet Union: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress—

3 (1) condemns anti-Semitic statements made by

4 members of the Russian Duma;

5 (2) commends actions taken by members of the

6 Russian Duma to condemn anti-Semitic statements

7 made by Duma members;

8 (3) commends President Yeltsin and other

9 members of the Russian Government for con-
3

•SCON 19 IS

1 demning anti-Semitic statements made by Duma

2 members; and

3 (4) reiterates its firm belief that peace and jus4 tice cannot be achieved as long as governments and

5 legislatures promote policies based upon anti-Semi6 tism, racism, and xenophobia.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accounts, we hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Form 10-K of our report dated March 18, 1998, included in this Annual Report
into VSI Enterprises, Inc. previously filed Registration Statement No. 33-44036
on Form S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration Statement No. 33-44035 on Form
S-8 dated November 14, 1991, Registration Statement No. 33-55094 on Form S-3
dated November 25, 1992, Registration Statement No. 33-56856 on Form S-8 dated
January 8, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-72512 on Form S-8 dated December
3, 1993, Registration Statement No. 33-81314 on Form S-8 dated July 7, 1994,
Registration Statement No. 333-728 on Form S-3 dated January 30, 1996,
Registration Statement No. 33-85754 on Form S-3 dated January 30, 1996
(Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), Registration Statement No. 333-15123 on Form
S-3 dated October 30, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-18237 on Form S-8
dated December 19, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-18239 on Form S-8 dated
December 19, 1996, Registration Statement No. 333-30597 on Form S-3 dated June
30, 1997, Registration Statement No. 333-44407 on Form S-3 dated January 14,
1998 and Registration Statement No. 333-48635 on Form S-3 dated March 25, 1998,
of our report dated March 5, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of VSI Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the Company's
annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.



/s/  Grant Thornton LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 12, 1999




                                       82
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Xu KechengName:
Xu KechengTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Carol COLE, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

No. 87-1851.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Wolfson, Grossman, Herscher & Polsky and Marcia Harris Malloy, Miami Beach, for appellant.

*316Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty. and Cynthia Johnson and Eric K. Gressman, Asst. Co. Attys., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

After the trial court announced its intention to rule upon and grant the defendant’s motion for directed verdict at the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, plaintiff’s counsel announced the taking of a voluntary dismissal under Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.420(a)(1).1 Contrary to the trial judge’s view, it is clear that the dismissal was timely asserted at that stage of the proceedings. *Gonzalez v. Mulreany,*875 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); see *Fears v. Lunsford,*314 So.2d 578 (Fla.1975); *Freeman v. Mintz,*— So. 2d - (Fla. 3d DCA Case nos. 85-1725, 85-2583 *&*86-417, opinion filed, February 9, 1988) [13 FLW 412]. Consequently, the judgment subsequently entered for the defendant is reversed.

1

. We reject the defendant's contention that the announcement was not sufficiently explicit. In context, the record clearly demonstrates the plaintiff’s intention to invoke the voluntary dismissal rule and the trial judge's understanding that this had indeed been accomplished. Corn-pare *Tate*v. *Gray,*292 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974).
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Gennaro Mazielo, Appellant.

(Argued February 1, 1916;

decided February 22, 1916.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered June 23, 1915, at a Trial Term for the county of Kings, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*652
      *Robert M. Moore*for appellant.

*James O. Cropsey, District Attorney (Ralph E. Hemstreet*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seaburt, JJ.
#### In re Application of Archie L. JEFFERSON For Admission To the Louisiana State Bar.

No. 86-OB-1240.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 19, 1987.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Archie L. Jefferson be admitted to the Louisiana State Bar Association having satisfied all requirements for Bar admission.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 14

- 00254

- CR

________________

WILLIAM RUSSELL YORK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13

- 17280

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant William Russell York

pleaded guilty to aggravated assault. The trial court found the evidence sufficient

to find York guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed York on community

supervision for five years, and assessed a fine of $750. The State subsequently

filed a motion to revoke York’s unadjudicated community supervision. York

pleaded “true” to four violations of the conditions of his community supervision.

The trial court found that York had violated the conditions of his community2 supervision, found York guilty of aggravated assault, and assessed punishment at

five years of confinement.

York’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s profe ssional

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.

1978). On November 18, 2 014, we granted an extension of time for York to file a

pro se bri ef. We received no response from York. We have reviewed the appellate

record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues support an

appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to

re

- brief the appeal. Co mpare Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment. 1

AFFIRMED.

________________________________ STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice

Submitted on February 23 , 2015

Opinion Delivered March 18, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

1 York may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
EXHIBIT 21

                  Subsidiaries of Bremer Financial Corporation

Name of Subsidiaries and State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation as of
March 29, 1996:

State of Minnesota:

          First American Bank of Alexandria
          First American Bank of Brainerd
          First American Bank of Breckenridge
          First American Bank of Detroit Lakes
          First American Bank of International Falls
          First American Bank Metro
          First American Bank Southwest
          First American Bank of Willmar
          Bremer Financial Services, Inc.
          Bremer Investment Services, Inc.
          First American Insurance Agencies, Inc.
          First American Trust Company of Minnesota
          First American Services, Inc.

State of North Dakota:

          First American Bank North Dakota
          First American Bank West
          First American Insurance Agencies, Inc.
          First American Bank Valley
          First American Bank of Wahpeton

State of Wisconsin:

          Dunn County Bankshares, Inc., parent of First American Bank Wisconsin
          and Premium Finance Corporation

State of Arizona:

          Bremer First American Life Insurance Company

United States (National Bank Act):

          First American Bank, National Association, Crookston, Minnesota
          First American Bank, National Association, St. Cloud, Minnesota
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William FERRELL.

No. 87-KH-0053.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 12, 1987.

In re Ferrell, William; applying for writ of habeas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “M”.

Denied. A petition is pending in the district court.