alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0424 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 -NM - 003 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### CF - 2013 - 41 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s , list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
cwss_ex1001.htm

EXHIBIT 10.01
  
 ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
   
 I, Abraham Mishal, accept the position of Chief Financial officer for Creative Waste Solutions, a Nevada Corp.
   
 I also agree to maintain my position as a Director.
  
  
 Dated, December 3rd, 2020
  
 	 	 	 	 
			/s/ Abraham Mishal	
	  
	  
	 Abraham Mishal
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October
      20, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
      M. CancioHugo
      M. CancioTitle:
      Principal Financial Officer
#### Robert HIPPENSTEEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-907.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 2, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for aggravated battery, retaliating against a witness and criminal mischief. Appellant’s counsel appropriately filed an *Anders*brief. *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We write only to suggest that error was committed for the trial court’s failure to declare a mistrial after the prosecutor called the defendant, and his codefendant, “punks” and then sarcastically responded to the court’s ruling in sustaining the objection by referring to the defendants as “These two fine, upstanding young ...” This type of comment and behavior should never be permitted in a courtroom lest all observers believe it is acceptable. It is not, as was not the behavior which led the judge to threaten contempt proceedings against the prosecutor. As we said, this was error but because of the overwhelming evidence of guilt and because we do not find the comments could have led to an improper verdict we deem the error harmless. We suggest the trial judge might do *1028well to review the matter with the prosecutor, at least.

AFFIRMED.

SHARP, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.
#### Manuel MARRERO, Appellant, v. FPA CORPORATION and Corporate Group Service, Inc., c/o Adjustco, Inc., Appellees.

No. BO-150.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Sept. 1, 1987.

Mark L. Zientz, of Williams & Zientz, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Albert P. Massey, III, of Pyszka, Kes-sler, Massey, Weldon, Catri, Holton & Douberley, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellees.

BARFIELD, Judge.

In this workers’ compensation appeal, the claimant asserts the deputy commissioner erred in allowing the employer/carrier to take credit for overpayments of permanent total disability benefits. The deputy’s finding that a clerical error during a system change constituted a reasonable basis for the overpayments is supported by competent substantial evidence in the record and complies with the requirements of *Belam Florida Corporation v. Dardy,*397 So.2d 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), and its progeny. We note that appellant concedes that clerical error may be a reasonable basis for overpayment, and that the parties had stipulated that if the deputy found a reasonable basis for the overpayments any future credits would be taken at 15% of the biweekly payments.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, J., concurs.

WENTWORTH, J., dissents with opinion.

WENTWORTH, Judge,

dissenting.

I would reverse because I find no concession from appellee beyond recognition as to clerical error in the abstract: “While that may be a reasonable reason for an overpayment, it totally disregards that the evidence reveals” the error here was generated by the agent’s violation of section 440.-20(2), Florida Statutes. Appellee cites neither precedent nor rationale that the clerical nature of an error would establish a right to recoupment, and I find none.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PAUL ERNEST VARCHETTI,

Appellant,

v.

JULIE ANNE VARCHETTI,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-2996

[November 16, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Janet C. Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312019DR000482.

Amy D. Shield and Roger Levine of Shield & Levine, P.A., Boca Raton, 

for appellant.

Kevin Rollin of Napier & Rollin, PLLC, Vero Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
S. Con. Res. 151 Agreed to October 18, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2348) entitled ‘‘An

Act to authorize the Bureau of Reclamation to provide cost sharing

for the endangered fish recovery implementation programs for the

Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basins.’’, the Clerk of the

House of Representatives shall make the following correction:

Strike section 4 and insert:

‘‘SEC. 4. EFFECT ON RECLAMATION LAW.

‘‘Specifically with regard to the acreage limitation provisions

of Federal reclamation law, any action taken pursuant to or in

furtherance of this title will not—

‘‘(1) be considered in determining whether a district as

defined in section 202(2) of the Reclamation Reform Act of

1982 (43 U.S.C. 390bb) has discharged its obligation to repay

the construction cost of project facilities used to make irrigation

water available for delivery to land in the district;

‘‘(2) serve as the basis for reinstating acreage limitation

provisions in a district that has completed payment of its

construction obligations; or
S. Con. Res. 151—2

‘‘(3) serve as the basis for increasing the construction repayment obligation of the district and thereby extending the period

during which the acreage limitation provisions will apply.’’.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
#### Yvonne CLARK v. Don WILSON and the Moore Group (Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Company).

No. 87-C-0675.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Clark, Yvonne; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA/86/0919; Parish of East Baton Rouge, City Court of Baton Rouge, Div. “C”, Nos. 8509, 8053.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 1198.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Albert HOOD, Jr. v. STATE of Louisiana, et al., 17th Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafourche, State of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0280.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 16, 1987.

In re Hood, Albert Jr.; applying for writ of mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-87-126; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 102281.

Granted. The district court is ordered to act, if it has not already done so, on the *104post conviction petition submitted on or about April 7, 1986, if it has been filed.
#### MARINA LUSSIER *v.*PHILIP LUSSIER

*Vito A. Castignoli,*in support of the petition.

*Diana L. Mercer,*in opposition.

Decided March 17, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 924 (AC 16759), is denied.
Order entered December 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00930-CR

ALICE ANNETTE STEELE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F08-45120-M

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Belinda Baraka’s request for an extension of time to 

file the reporter’s record to the extent that we ORDER Ms. Baraka to file the record within 

THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

The clerk’s record is overdue. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk 

to file the clerk’s record in this appeal by DECEMBER 23, 2013.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to 

Belinda Baraka, official court reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas 

County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and 

to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
----

----

----

|                     12. | Successors and      Assigns.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall      inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs,      representatives, administrators, successors and assigns; provided,      however, that (i) Assignor may assign this Agreement and its rights and      obligations hereunder to any entity acquiring the Note and Loan Documents      with the prior written consent of Assignee, and (ii) Assignee may not      assign or transfer all or any portion of this Agreement and its rights and      obligations hereunder without the prior written consent of      Assignor. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

|   | By: | /s/ David      Hanson |
|--------|-----|-----------------------|

|   | Name: | David      Hanson |
|--------|-------|-------------------|

|   | Title: | UMTH      GS L.P.- Advisor |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|

|   | By: | /s/ Ben      Wissink |
|--------|-----|----------------------|

|   | Name: | Ben      Wissink |
|--------|-------|------------------|

|   | Title: | Chief      Operating Officer |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lorne Broten hereby certifies as follows:

(a)  I am the Chief Financial Officer of Barrington Sciences Corporation (the
     "Company");

(b)  To the best of my knowledge, the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
     the year ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") complies in all material
     respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934, as amended; and

(c)  To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the
     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        BARRINGTON SCIENCES CORPORATION

Date:  May 1, 2007                      /S/ Lorne Broten
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Lorne Broten
                                        Chief Financial Officer

     This certificate accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Supplemental Information to be Furnished With Reports Filed Pursuant to Section
15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to
Section 12 of the Act

No annual report or proxy material has been sent to security holders of the
Company. The Company does not anticipate sending out a separate annual report or
proxy material to its security holders subsequent to the filing of the annual
report. In the event that the Company determines that it will send out either a
separate annual report or any proxy materials, the Company will furnish copies
of such material to the Securities and Exchange Commission when it is sent to
security holders.
Exhibit
      32.1


**APD
      ANTIQUITIES, INC.**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


In
      connection with the periodic report of APD ANTIQUITIES, INC., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      CINDY K. SWANK, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of
      the
      date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the
      United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      at
      the dates and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.


Date:
      November 6, 2007





By:
            /s/
                Cindy K. SwankCindy
                K. Swank, PresidentChief
                Executive Officer,Chief
                Financial Officer
Spa Rental, LLC., 

Dba Msi Aviation 

Complainant, Appellant, 

v. 

Somerset-Pulski County 

Airport Board, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

FAA Docket No.16-13-02 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S BRIEF 

(REPLY TO APPEAL) ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 22, 2016. 

Complainant, SPA Rental, LLC., dba MSI Aviation hereby moves for an order granting it 

January 22, 2016. 

, hio Reg. 0011186 

T "hl Counsel for Complainant 

130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

Telephone: (937) 228-8363 

Facsimile: (937) 228-0520 

EMail: your_lawyer@ sbcglobal.net 
Counsel for Complainant/Appellant estimates that documenting a Reply addressing these 

misstatements will consume at lest three weeks subsequent to the conclusion of the Christmas/New 

Years' holiday. 

Leave to file the anticipated Reply is respectfully requested. 

{ 

nra uczak, io eg. 0011186 

Trial ounsel for Co plainant 

130 West Second Street, Suite 1010 

Dayton, OH 45402 

Telephone: (937) 228-8363 

Facsimile: (937) 228-0520 

EMail: your_lawyer@ sbcglobal.net 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal was 

served upon Jessie Di Gregory, Office of the Chief Counsel, by emailing it to 

Jessie.DiGregory@faa.gov and Rob.Hawks@faa.gov upon FAA Docket Clerk, by emailing it to 

9-A WA-AGC-PART -16@faa.gov and upon Ms. Rachel Owsley by emailing it to 

rowsley@stites.com and upon Ms. Bethany Breetz by e "ling it to eetz stites.com on 

December 23, 2015.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jerry OSBERRY.

No. 87-K-2425.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Osberry, Jerry; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. KA-6817, KA-7354; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 313-216.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 1239.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
----

**Exhibit 32**

**Certification Pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officersof Newport Gold, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does herebycertify, [to such officer's knowledge], that:

The Form 10-QSB for thenine-month period ended September 30, 2007****(the"Form *10-QSB*") of theCompany fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form *10-QSB* fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: May 16, 2008 | /s/ Derek Bartlett                              |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Derek Bartlett, Chief Executive Officer

  |
|                    |                                                 |
| Date: May 16, 2008 | /s/ John Arnold                                 |
|                    | John Arnold, Chief Financial Officer            |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny L. SANDERS.

No. 87-K-0869.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Sanders, Johnny L.; applying for supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18-417-KA; Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-2090-A.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 240.

Denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 13-0030

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.A.J., A

CHILD

§ RT OF APPEALS

Van Zandt County,

§

§

FILE COPY

th District.

March 8, 2013

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby isdenied denied.

•••••••*••

I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

The Court, noting that petitioner has filed an affidavit attesting to the inability to pay

costs herein expended, hereby waives payment of costs.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 19th day of April, 2013.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Kathy Sandoval, Deputy Clerk
Ref: 

LE GOUVERNEMENT 

DU GRAND-DUCHE DE LUXEMBOURG 

Ministere du Developpement durable 

et des Infrastructures 

Direction de !'aviation civile 

2015- 45232 

Correspondent: Mr. Marc RAUS 

Tel : {+352) 247-74946 

e-mail: marc.raus@av.etat.lu 

Y/Ref: 

Luxembourg, 1 7 MARS 2015 

Office of International Aviation- US 

Department of Transportation 

c/o Mr. Paul GRETCH 

Director 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

Subject: Charter Operations between the Grand- Duchy of Luxembourg and the United 

States of America 

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

This is to confirm that the Luxembourg Government, on the basis of reciprocity, will approve 

requests from US - designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth and seventh freedom charter 

operations on the understanding that the US Government will approve similar requests from 

Luxembourg- designated airlines 

4, rue Lou Hemmer 

L-1748 Luxembourg 

Tel (+352) 247 749oo 

Fax (+352) 46 77 90 

Director o Civil Aviation 

info@dac.public.lu www.dac.public.lu 

www.mt.public.lu