alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 23 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.23
                                        Agreed to March 25, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, March 25, 1999, Friday, March 26, 1999, Saturday, March 27, 
1999, or Sunday, March 28, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 12, 1999, or until 
such time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his 
designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when 
the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 25, 1999, 
or Friday, March 26, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 12, 1999, for morning-hour 
debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16537]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1819]


Grant of Authority for Subzone Status Piramal Critical Care, 
Inc., (Inhalation Anesthetics), Bethlehem, PA

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``* * * the 
establishment* * * of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the 
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for 
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant 
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade 
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of 
entry;
    Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the 
establishment of special-purpose subzones when existing zone facilities 
cannot serve the specific use involved, and when the activity results 
in a significant public benefit and is in the public interest;
    Whereas, Lehigh Valley Economic Development Corporation, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 272, has made application to the Board for authority 
to establish a special-purpose subzone at the inhalation anesthetic 
manufacturing and distribution facilities of Piramal Critical Care, 
Inc., located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (FTZ Docket 52-2010, filed 
August 31, 2010);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (75 FR 54594-54595, 9/8/2010) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby grants authority for subzone 
status for activity related to the manufacturing and distribution of 
inhalation anesthetics at the facilities of Piramal Critical Care, 
Inc., located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (Subzone 272B), as described 
in the application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act 
and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 8th day of March 2012.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6818 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE; P
49903.

#### ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DOBBS.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

Code Ann. § 3-808 provides that if the *plaintiff*voluntarily dismisses his case, he may file again within six months and the renewed suit is not thereby made subject to a statute of limitation which may have intervened since the filing of the original action. In *Dollar v. Webb,*132 Ga. App. 811 (209 SE2d 253), it was held that this section did not apply where a case had been automatically dismissed under Code Ann. § 81A-141 because no written order had been taken therein over a five-year period where the case was not refiled within six months thereafter, and the statute of limitation had run. Such a dismissal is involuntary, and therefore is within the purview of Code Ann. § 81A-141 (b) covering all involuntary dismissals which provides that "any dismissal not provided for in this section, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction or for improper venue or for lack of an indispensable party, operates as an adjudication upon the merits.”

In *Dollar,*supra, we held that a suit could not be refiled where (1) the statute of limitation on the original cause of action had run, and (b) the suit was sought to be refiled *more than*six months from the date on which the original complaint stood automatically dismissed.

In the present case, although the statute of limitation had otherwise run, the action was refiled within the six-month period thereafter. It thus only remains to be ascertained whether Code Ann. § 81A-141 (b) operates to make the automatic dismissal following a period of five years in which no order has been taken in the case operate as an involuntary dismissal "not provided for in this section.” Code Ann. § 81A-141 (e) is a part of the section, and specifies as follows: "Any suit in which no written order is taken for a period of five years shall automatically stand dismissed.” Accordingly, it cannot operate under subsection as a "dismissal on the merits,” and the plaintiff has six months from the date of such automatic dismissal to refile the complaint. The same result is reached in our recent cases of *Kalin v. Pfarner,*
      *226124 Ga. App. 816 (186 SE2d*365); Maxey v. Covington,*126 Ga. App. 197 (190 SE2d 448); and *Jernigan v. Collier,*131 Ga. App. 162 (205 SE2d 450).

Submitted November 7, 1974

Decided March 10, 1975.

*Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Eugene P. Chambers, Jr., Peter K. Kintz,*for appellant.

*Charles H. Hyatt, Ernest J. Nelson, Jr.,*for appellee.

The trial court did not err in denying the motion to dismiss the complaint as refiled, which was based on the contention that the automatic dismissal of the prior action was a bar to the present suit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Stolz and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Annual Report of Presstek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the for the period ended December 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Cook,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


April
      30, 2008
            /s/ Jeffrey A. CookJeffrey
      A. Cook
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Presstek, Inc. and will be retained by Presstek, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
September 27, 2011

MEMORANDUM

From: William H. Maxwell

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01)

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234

Subject: Meeting with Exelon

Attendees :

See attached.

Discussion :

A general discussion was held of the comme nts submitted by Exelon on the proposed Mercury

and Air Toxics Standards.
Open Literature Review Screen Chemical Name: Atrazine CAS No: 1912-24-9 Citation: Rimet, F., M. H. De Lacotte, et al. (1999). "Atrazine and Nicosu1furon effects on phytoplanktonic communities ofLake ofGeneva." Archives Des Sciences 52(2): 111- 122. Date of Screen: 

### 10/28/09 Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study was not written in English. Primary Reviewer: Michael Lowit, Ph.D., EPA

# '/~eW**~v<lf**

1 

# 1II1IIIIII 2087844
Exhibit 10.3


 


November
23, 2020


 


Leisure
Acquisition Corp.


250
West 57th Street, Suite 415


New York, New York 10107


 


Re:
LACQ -- Reduction of Deferred Discount


 


Ladies
and Gentlemen:


 


This
letter references the underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”), dated December 1, 2017, among
the undersigned, as the underwriters named on Schedule I of the Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriters”),
and Leisure Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), providing for the issuance and sale
to the several Underwriters of an aggregate of 20,000,000 units of the Company. Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Underwriting Agreement.


 


The
Underwriters agree to forfeit (and irrevocably waive any right to) $250,000 of the Deferred Discount that is to be paid to the
Underwriters upon the consummation of a Business Combination and paid out of the proceeds of the Offering held in the Trust Account
in accordance with Section 6(hh) of the Underwriting Agreement. As a result of the foregoing forfeiture and waiver, the remaining
Deferred Discount equals $6,750,000. Except as modified by this paragraph, the Underwriting Agreement shall otherwise remain in
full force and effect.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Jon Sierant                    
	 	Name: 	Jon Sierant
	 	Title:	Executive Director
	 	 	 
	 	EARLYBIRDCAPITAL, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Steven Levine
	 	Name: 	Steven Levine
	 	Title:	CEO



 


	Acknowledged and accepted by:	 
	 	 
	LEISURE ACQUISITION CORP.	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ George Peng	 
	Name:  	George Peng	 
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
----

----

|   | (1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)               The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February      13, 2009 | /s/                                     |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                   | Paul      Roszel                        |
|                   | President,      Chief Executive Officer |

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PeopleSupport, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lance Rosenzweig, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 /s/ Lance Rosenzweig

Lance RosenzweigChairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive OfficerMay 10, 2006
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 210A/25 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 210A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6525 ta' Mejju 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 210A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6525 ta' Mejju 2022

---

| Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifika |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Rettifika tal-Impriża Konġunta Ewropa b’Bażi Bijoloġika (CBE JU, Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking) — Pubblikazzjoni ta’ post battal għall-kariga ta’ Direttur Eżekuttiv (Aġent Temporanju — Grad AD 14) — COM/2022/2007 ( ĠU C 206 A, 23.5.2022 ) | 1 |

Werrej

Paġna

Rettifika

2022/C 210 A/01

Rettifika tal-Impriża Konġunta Ewropa b’Bażi Bijoloġika (CBE JU, Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking) — Pubblikazzjoni ta’ post battal għall-kariga ta’ Direttur Eżekuttiv (Aġent Temporanju — Grad AD 14) — COM/2022/2007 ( ĠU C 206 A, 23.5.2022 )

( ĠU C 206 A, 23.5.2022 )

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

Rettifika

| 25.5.2022 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 210/1

---

Rettifika tal-Impriża Konġunta Ewropa b’Bażi Bijoloġika (CBE JU, Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking) — Pubblikazzjoni ta’ post battal għall-kariga ta’ Direttur Eżekuttiv (Aġent Temporanju — Grad AD 14) — COM/2022/2007

(
  Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea C 206 A tat-23 ta’ Mejju 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

Fil-paġna 5, “Data tal-għeluq”, l-ewwel paragrafu,

| minflok: | “Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni hija t-13 ta’ Ġunju 2022, 12.00 nofsinhar ħin ta’ Brussell, u wara din id-data ma jkunx aktar possibbli li tirreġistra.”, |
| --- | --- |

minflok:

“Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni hija t-13 ta’ Ġunju 2022, 12.00 nofsinhar ħin ta’ Brussell, u wara din id-data ma jkunx aktar possibbli li tirreġistra.”,

| aqra: | “Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni hija l-4 ta’ Lulju 2022, f’nofsinhar (12.00) ħin ta’ Brussell, u wara din id-data ma jkunx aktar possibbli li tirreġistra.”. |
| --- | --- |

aqra:

aqra:

“Id-data tal-għeluq għar-reġistrazzjoni hija l-4 ta’ Lulju 2022, f’nofsinhar (12.00) ħin ta’ Brussell, u wara din id-data ma jkunx aktar possibbli li tirreġistra.”.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1443

ERIC C. HANSEN, Petitioner, versusCALDWELL DIVING COMPANY, INCORPORATED; EMPLOYER’S INSURANCE OF WAUSAU; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Division of Longshore Harbors Workers; BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (BRB-98-1596) Submitted: February 8, 2001 Decided: February 13, 2001 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric C. Hansen, Petitioner Pro Se. Stephen Edward Darling, SINKLER & BOYD, P.A., Charleston, South Carolina; Laura Jessica Stomski, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eric C. Hansen seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denialof benefits pursuant to the Longshore & Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-950 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). Hansenalso appeals the Board’s order denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decisions are based upon substantial evidence and are without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Hansen v. Caldwell Diving Co., Inc. , No. BRB-98-1596 (Sept. 7, 1999 & Feb. 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32

Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I, Robert E. Busch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify
that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

| |                                                      
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Robert
  E. Busch                                
| |                                                      
| | Robert E. Busch                                      
| | Chief
  Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| | May 12, 2006                                         

---
#### John SMITH v. EBASCO SERVICES, INC. and Employers National Insurance Company.

No. 88-C-1024.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Smith, John; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19458-CA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 85-4246.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 551.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
#### John Michael WORTHEN, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Respondent.

No. F-83-680.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

Dec. 17, 1985.

Patti Palmer, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Robert W. Cole, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR REHEARING, AND WITHDRAWING OPINION FROM CIRCULATION

On October 22, 1985, this Court entered an opinion affirming the conviction of the above appellant in the above numbered appeal for the charge of Distribution of Marijuana, After Former Conviction of Two or More Felonies. Appellant was sentenced to eighteen years’ imprisonment and a fine of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500).

In the petition for rehearing filed November 12, 1985, it is set forth that the court appointed attorney who represented appellant in this trial had previously served as assistant district attorney and successfully convicted appellant in the two former convictions which were used for enhancement of punishment. It is therefore asserted that the attorney was operating under an actual conflict of interest and should have informed the court of his conflict of *944interest, at the time of his appointment' as counsel. We believe the petition for rehearing contains merit and should be granted.

The United States Supreme Court held in *Cuyler v. Sullivan,*446 U.S. 335, 100 S.Ct. 1708, 1717, 64 L.Ed.2d 333 (1976), that a defense counsel has an ethical obligation to avoid conflicting representations and to advise the court promptly to avoid conflict of interest arising during the course of trial. See also this Court’s holdings in *Howerton v. State,*640 P.2d 566, 567 (Okl.Cr.1972); *Manous v. State,*690 P.2d 473 (Okl.Cr.1984); and *Jennings v. State,*(Unpublished order September 14, 1984).

This Court finds, under the circumstances of this case, that an evidentiary hearing may be necessary to clarify the appellant’s contentions relative to the asserted conflict of interests.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that the petition for rehearing shall be granted. It is further ordered that the Opinion of October 22, 1985, SHALL BE WITHDRAWN FROM PUBLICATION.

ED PARKS, Presiding Judge

TOM BRETT, Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 162 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.162
                                     Agreed to December 15, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Clerk of the House of Representatives, in the enrollment of 
the bill (H.R. 4577), making appropriations for the Departments of 
Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and related agencies 
for the fiscal year ending September 2001, and for other purposes, 
shall make the following correction:
        In section 1(a)(4), before the period at the end, insert the 
    following: ``, except that the text of H.R. 5666, as so enacted, 
    shall not include section 123 (relating to the enactment of H.R. 
    4904)''.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```