alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 6, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
              A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              August
                8, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 85 (Thursday, May 2, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 25782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-10308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air 
Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending April 20, 2013. The 
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0082.
    Date Filed: April 17, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: May 8, 2013.
    Description: Joint application of American Airlines, Inc., US 
Airways, Inc., American Eagle Airlines, Inc., PSA Airlines, Inc. and 
Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (collectively, the ``Joint Applicants'') 
requesting approval of the de facto route transfer of US Airways', 
PSA's, and Piedmont's route authority to AA/Eagle, and the reissuance 
of the route authorities of all the carriers in order to comply with 
the applicable aviation statutes.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-10308 Filed 5-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9x-P
```
#### Larry E. GRANDISON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1571.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 30, 1987.

*75James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Grandison appeals his sentence following his conviction for robbery without a weapon, forgery and uttering a forgery.1 We vacate the sentence because the trial court failed to provide written reasons for imposing adult sanctions pursuant to section 39.111(6)(d), Florida Statutes (1985); *State v. Rhoden,*448 So.2d 1013 (Fla.1984); *Posey v. State,*501 So.2d 192 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); *Johnson v. State, 477*So.2d 56 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), *review denied,*486 So.2d 596 (Fla.1986).

Upon remand, the trial court should consider a properly calculated scoresheet. Victim injury cannot be scored because it is not an element of robbery,2 however, the trial court may consider victim injury as a clear and convincing reason for departure. *Vega v. State,*498 So.2d 1294 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).3

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

1

. §§ 812.13(2)(c), 831.01, 831.02, Fla.Stat. (1985).

2

. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7).

3

*.See also Byrd v. State,*503 So.2d 434 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); *Ritts*v. *State,*491 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 

DIVISION ONE 

STATE OF WASHINGTON, 

Respondent, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. 72536-0-1 

rn 

(-7) cf 

x) 

v. ) tr) zEqjr-- 

> 

) 

ABDULKADIR ALI, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION 

Ci) 

) 

Appellant. ) FILED: December 19, 2016 

) 

PER CURIAM. Abdulkadir Ali challenges the judgment and sentence imposed 

following his guilty plea to second degree assault. His court-appointed attorney has 

filed a motion to withdraw on the ground that there is no basis for a good faith argument 

on review. Pursuant to State v. Theobald, 78 Wn.2d 184, 470 P.2d 188 (1970), and 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967), the motion 

to withdraw must: 

(1) be accompanied by a brief referring to anything in the record that might 

arguably support the appeal. (2) A copy of counsel's brief should be 

furnished the indigent and (3) time allowed him to raise any points that he 

chooses; (4) the court—not counsel—then proceeds, after ,a full examination 

of all the proceedings, to decide whether the case is wholly frivolous. 

Theobald, 78 Wn.2d at 185 (quoting Anders, 386 U.S. at 744). 

This procedure has been followed. All's counsel on appeal filed a brief with the 

motion to withdraw. Ali was served with a copy of the brief and informed of his right to 

file a statement of additional grounds for review. Ali did not file a supplemental brief. 

The material facts are accurately set forth in counsel's brief in support of the 

motion to withdraw. The court has reviewed the briefs filed in this court and has 
No. 72536-0-1/2 

independently reviewed the entire record. The court specifically considered the 

following potential issues raised by counsel: 

Was Ali's guilty plea knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made? 

The issues raised by counsel are wholly frivolous. The motion to withdraw is 

granted and the appeal is dismissed. 

FOR THE COURT: 

$e (Ja-g ) , 

2
#### GLEN JOHNSON, INC., and The American Insurance Company, Appellants, v. L.M. HOWDESHELL, INC., Appellee.

Nos. 87-215, 87-698.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 22, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 24, 1988.

*298Eloise L. Moritz of Moritz, Dickey & Moritz, Chartered, Largo, for appellants.

Andrew White III, of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel, Smith, Cutler & Kent, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Appellants, Glen Johnson, Inc. (Glen Johnson), and The American Insurance Company (American), appeal a final judgment of $11,045.10 plus attorney’s fees of $9,717.50 entered in favor of appellee, L.M. Howdeshell, Inc. (Howdeshell), on a construction contract. We affirm the judgment but find that the trial court erred in the computation of attorney’s fees by allowing compensation for services rendered in the prior arbitration proceeding.

Appellee Howdeshell, a subcontractor on a construction job, entered into an agreement with appellant Glen Johnson, a contractor, to furnish labor and materials. A dispute arose and Howdeshell filed a complaint to recover amounts due under the subcontract against Glen Johnson and American, the surety on the contractor’s bond. The complaint prayed for damages and attorney’s fees, pursuant to the surety agreement. Appellants requested arbitration and the trial court ordered the parties to submit their claims to arbitration. The arbitrator decided that payment was not due to the subcontractor from the general contractor until the general contractor was paid by the owner. The arbitrator dismissed the claims without prejudice because all conditions precedent to payment had not been met.

Appellee filed a motion to modify or vacate the arbitration award in circuit court. The trial court found that all conditions precedent to payment had been satisfied, entered final judgment for appellee in the sum of $11,045.10, and reserved jurisdiction to determine the amount of attorney’s fees. The court after a hearing awarded appellee $9,717.50 in attorney’s fees.

We agree with appellants’ contention that the trial court improperly included attorney’s fees for the arbitration proceeding in his award of fees against appellants. Attorney’s fees for arbitration proceedings are expressly excluded by section 682.11, Florida Statutes (1985). Appellee contends that this issue was not preserved below for review and therefore we should not consider it. However, it is clear from the transcript of the fee hearing that appellant’s counsel expected to argue this issue. His questions of the witnesses clearly show that he was trying to distinguish between time spent on the arbitration proceeding and time spent on the enforcement proceeding. The testimony presented demonstrates the award of fees included compensation for preparation and attendance at the arbitration proceedings which is prohibited.

We, therefore, remand for recomputation of the amount of fees awarded to exclude any time appellee’s counsel expended in connection with the arbitration proceeding. In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.

DANAHY, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 46

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the Apollo-11 mission successfully landed a manned

spacecraft on the Moon on July 20, 1969, marking the

first time in history that humans have walked on the surface of the Moon or any other planet;

Whereas the 6 Apollo missions successfully departed Earth

aboard a Saturn V Rocket, the largest and most powerful

American rocket ever produced, en route to the Moon;

Whereas 12 Americans successfully landed on the surface of

the Moon where they performed various experiments and

collected samples for study, and planted the flag of the

United States of America in the lunar soil achieving a

milestone in American and human history;

Whereas the contributions of other Americans who made up

the thousands of contractors and Government employees

who worked on the Apollo program are recognized; and

Whereas the events of the Apollo missions are examples of

the great achievements of the American space program

reflecting the explorer’s spirit of the American people:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 30th

3 anniversary of the first lunar landing should be a day of
2

SCON 46 ES

1 celebration and reflection on the Apollo-11 mission to the

2 Moon and the accomplishments of the Apollo program

3 throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Passed the Senate July 20, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 46

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20,

the 1960’s and 1970’s.complishments of the Apollo program throughoutthe Apollo-11 mission to the Moon and the acshould be a day of celebration and reflection on1999, 30th anniversary of the first lunar landing
Order entered November 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01400-CR

AHMAD RASHAD HAWKINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-30754-K

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion to substitute counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to 

substitute Sarah Fox as appellant’s retained attorney of record in place of Katherine Drew.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to Sarah Fox, Katherine Drew, and 

the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Irmgard LUTES.

No. 87-KK-0510.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re Lutes, Irmgard; applying for remedial and/or supervisory writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 10-86-568; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-87-0154.

Denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

WILLIAM MARK COLBURN, JR., ) DOC #D49113, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2623 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed September 20, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Walker, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

BLACK, BADALAMENTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17091]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7131]



[[Page 17091]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Trust Land Consolidation Draft Plan

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability, Comment Period Reopening.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Cobell Class Action Settlement Agreement established a 
trust land consolidation fund to be used for consolidating Indian trust 
and restricted lands and acquiring fractional interests in these lands. 
We are reopening the period for commenting on the Cobell Land 
Consolidation Program Draft Plan (also known as the Trust Land 
Consolidation Draft Plan), which is the draft plan for accomplishing 
these goals.

DATES: Submit comments by April 3, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments on the draft plan to: Elizabeth Appel, 
Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1001 Indian School Road NW., Suite 312, 
Albuquerque, NM 87104; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ce9e0e5f6edeee9f8e4a2edfcfce9e0cceee5eda2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3969f9a89929196879bdd928383969fb3919a92dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>. You can request 
copies of the draft plan by sending a letter or email to one of the 
above addresses or by calling 505-563-3805.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kallie Hanley, Department of the 
Interior, 1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone 202-208-
5397; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7318121f1f1a162c1b121d1f160a331a1c005d171c1a5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0863696464616d57606966646d714861677b266c6761266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 3, 2012, we published a notice 
announcing the availability of the trust land consolidation draft plan 
(77 FR 5528) and requesting comments by March 19, 2012. This notice 
reopens the comment period; the new deadline for our receipt of 
comments on the draft plan to April 3, 2012.

    Dated: March 19, 2012.
David J. Hayes,
Deputy Secretary of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2012-7131 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document



Exhibit 4.3




November 24, 2020 




Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, D.C.  20549


Re:    The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company – Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


    The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, an Ohio corporation (“Scotts Miracle-Gro”), is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 (the “Form 10-K”).


    Neither Scotts Miracle-Gro nor any of its consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt, other than those filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K, under which the total amount of long-term debt authorized exceeds ten percent (10%) of the total assets of Scotts Miracle-Gro and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.  In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation S-K, Scotts Miracle-Gro hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each such instrument or agreement defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of Scotts Miracle-Gro or the rights of holders of long-term debt of one of Scotts Miracle-Gro’s consolidated subsidiaries, in each case which is not being filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Form 10-K.


Very truly yours,


THE SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO COMPANY


/s/ THOMAS RANDAL COLEMAN


Thomas Randal Coleman
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
14111 Scottslawn Road Marysville, OH 43041 937-644-0011     
www.scotts.com
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan M. Spiller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Jonathan M. Spiller
-----------------------
Jonathan M. Spiller
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003


         In connection with the Annual Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
R. Schiller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Robert R. Schiller
----------------------
Robert R. Schiller
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 14567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05686]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8658]

International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice; 
Closed Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App Sec.  10(a)(2), the Department of State 
announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) 
to take place on April 2, 2014, at the Department of Defense, Pentagon, 
Washington DC 20001.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. App Sec.  10(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined 
that this meeting will be closed to the public because the ISAB will be 
reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with 
Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the 
Department of State with a continuing source of independent advice on 
all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, political-
military affairs, international security, and related aspects of public 
diplomacy.
    The agenda for this meeting will include a classified discussion 
and information exchange related to the ISAB's studies on current U.S. 
policy and issues regarding arms control, international security, 
nuclear proliferation, cyber stability, energy security, and diplomacy, 
as well as the future of cooperative threat reduction, Weapons of Mass 
Destruction (WMD) elimination, and nuclear strategic stability. The 
meeting will be held in conjunction with a meeting of the Department of 
Defense Threat Reduction Advisory Committee.
    For more information, contact Richard W. Hartman II, Executive 
Director of the International Security Advisory Board, U.S. Department 
of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4290.

    Dated: March 7, 2014.
Richard W. Hartman, II,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, U.S. 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-05686 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-35-P
```
P. 1



# OAR Box 1867 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 36 ) ll-B-9 0 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:21 AM

Sheet 36 of 95 ,

# ¥ P. 2 

# A-90-1 9 ll-B-9 0

MEMORANDU M TO : Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-1 9 FROM : Wand a Floy d DATE : January199 1 

## EP A A' R SUBJECT : HONNESHAP : Industr yCharacterist4es-/Met:hyl"M'ethacrylat e Attache d i s a product-proces s summar y(PPS ) fo r the productio n o f Methy l Methacrylat e vi a Hydrolysi s o f Aceton e Cyanohydri n category . Thi s PP S wa s develope d a s par t o f the Industria l Profil e projec t i n suppor t o f th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) regulatoryeffort . Informatio n i n thi s PP S i s use d a s a basi s fo r emission s an d cos t impac t estimate s fo r the HONprogram . Liste d belo war e the ke yreference s use d i n developing the attache d PPS . "Methy l Methacrylate. " In : Mannsvill e Chemica l Products . Ne wYork , February1988 . EPA-450/3-80-028e . Organi c Chemica l Manufacturing . Volum e 10 : Selecte d Processes . Decembe r 1980 . 198 9 Directoryo f Chemica l Producer s USA . SR I International , California , p . 788 . "Methy l Methacrylate. " In : Chemica l Marketin g Reporte r Company , Inc. , Ne wYork , Marc h 28 , 1988 . White , Howard . York , 1986 . p . Schnel l Publishing

Introductio n t o Industria l Chemistry . John Wile y& Sons , Ne w 108 . Chenier , Philip , Jr . Surveyo f Industria l Chemistry . John Wile y& Sons , Ne w York , 1986 . pp . 181-182 . "Selecting th e Proces s fo r You r Nex t MM APlant . "In : Hydrocarbo n Processing . Gul f Publishin g Company , Texas , Marc h 1986 . pp . 37-43 . 

# Hi e Corcespeuii g <.# ; 

# ns s Documenti s Decke l ite n A-90-1 9 ll-B-25 2

cao.06 7 methyl.me t