alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Mercury Finance Company:

                         RE:  REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-8

                         o    Employee Stock Purchase Plan
                         o    1989 Stock Option and Incentive Compensation Plan
                         o    401(k) Plan

We consent to incorporation by reference in the subject Registration Statements
(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 1989, May 11, 1989
and June 26, 1989) of Mercury Finance Company of our report dated February 12,
1996 except as to notes 1, 4, 7, 12, 14, 15, and 16 which are dated as of
October 27, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mercury Finance
Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995,
which report appears in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K, as
amended, of Mercury Finance Company.

                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
December 30, 1997
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|
|
|
|
|Dated: June 15, 2007 | /s/ Carmel Vernia      
|                     | Carmel Vernia          
|                     | Chief Executive Officer



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6015

GLENN LEE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DREW,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(6:10-cv-02412-TLW)

Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Glenn Lee Williams, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 

(West 2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Drew, 

No. 6:10-cv-02412-TLW (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2010). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 19 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 19

 To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to promote 
energy security through the production of petroleum from oil sands, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2010

  Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Chambliss) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 to promote 
energy security through the production of petroleum from oil sands, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil Sands Energy Security Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. PROCUREMENT AND ACQUISITION OF ALTERNATIVE FUELS.

    (a) In General.--Section 526 of the Energy Independence and 
Security Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17142) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1112 of the National Aeronautics 
and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2008 (42 U.S.C. 17827) is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-3388

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Mark Steven Woods, Jr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 24, 2009 Filed: November 30, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mark Woods (Woods) pled guilty to possessing more than 500 grams of cocaine with intent to distribute, in vi olation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B)(ii). The district court 1 imposed a sentence of 188 months in prison, a $2,500 fine, and 4 years of supervised release. On appeal, Woods’s counsel seeks to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that Woods should not have been sentenced as a career offender under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 because

1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.one of his two predicate offenses occu rred when he was ag e 17, although he was charged and convicted in federal court as an adult. We agree with the district court’ s career-offender determination. SeeU.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(a) (stating requirements for career-offender status), id. § 4B1.2 cmt. (n.1) (“[A] federal conviction for an offense co mmitted prior to the defendant’s eighteenth birthday is an adult convicti on if the defendant was expre ssly proceeded against as an adult”); United States v. Ojeda-Estrada , 577 F.3d 871, 875 (8th Cir. 2009) (declaring de novo review of a caree r-offender determination); United States v. McNeil , 90 F.3d 298, 299-300 (8th Cir. 1996) (holding a previous offense committed when the defendant was 17 years old was properly considered a predicate offense for determining career-offender status because the defendant was charged and convicted as an adult (citing United States v. Hazelett , 32 F.3d 1313, 1320 (8th Cir. 1994))). Further, we find no abuse of di scretion in the sentence, seeUnited States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (listing factors that constitute abuse of discretion), and no other nonfrivolous issues for appeal, see Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel
Group (the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of
the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 2, 2007                 /s/ Jiangping Jiang
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jiangping Jiang,
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7504

CHARLES R. TURNER,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director of Prisons; KIMBERLY RUNION, 

Director of V.C.B.R.; THE C.R.C. COMMITTEE, Names Unknown,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:11-cv-01086-CMH-TCB)

Submitted: February 16, 2012 Decided: February 22, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Turner appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Turner v. Johnson, No. 1:11-cv-01086-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. 

Oct. 21, 2011). See Huftile v. Miccio-Fonseca, 410 F.3d 1136, 

1139-40 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 

(1994), applies to civilly committed sex offenders). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Donna MATTHEWS, et al., Appellants, v. Vera ADAMS, et al., Appellees.

No. 87-1217.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 3, 1988.

*335Heidi T. Vonder Heide of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Joseph Morrell of Woolfork, Morrell & Williams, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a case involving an accounting. Some members of a nonprofit corporation sought an accounting of the funds they donated to the corporation and sought to require the holdover directors (trustees) of the corporation to cause the involuntary dissolution of the corporation to be corrected. The trial judge ordered an accounting and also ordered future audits yearly forever. Additionally the judge required the corporation to adopt bylaws and open a safe deposit box and “make the contents therein known to plaintiffs.”

Appellants appeal on the basis that the circuit court had no authority over them because they are a recognized religious organization, a church. On first reflection they appeared to be correct but upon a closer study of the complaint and the judgment we are of the opinion that this is not an improper interference by the government into a church, or ecclesiastical, matter. When the members of the church decided to incorporate their body under the laws of the state of Florida they submitted themselves to the jurisdiction of the state courts in all matters of a corporate nature, such as accounting for funds.

We affirm the order of the trial court directing an accounting, opening of the safe deposit box and the curing of the involuntary dissolution. We cannot agree it is proper to order annual, ad infinitum, audits of the books so we reverse that portion of the judgment. Because the corporation has the right to pass or not pass bylaws, or even to voluntarily dissolve hereafter, we do not deem it warranted to require the enactment of bylaws, so we reverse that portion of the judgment also. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, C.J., and DANIEL, J., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7437

ERNEST WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-95-1688-3-18BC) Submitted: June 16, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ernest Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ernest Williams, a South Carolina inmate, seeks to appeal thedistrict court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondents in his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998)).The district court also denied Williams’s motions seeking appointment of counsel and an enlargement of time. We have reviewed therecord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Because Williams failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a federal right, we deny a certificate of probable cause and dismiss this appeal. See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0336

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GINA DELIGHT KRUEGER,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 22, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0336
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6438]



[[Page 15370]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shelley E. Garr,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-6438 Filed 3-13-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report of Wikiloan, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marco Garibaldi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
  2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November 4, 2010
 /s/ Marco GaribaldiMarco GaribaldiChief Executive Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

William Earl Stirman

, * From the 238 th District

Court of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR38912

.

Vs. No. 11

- 12

- 00090

- CR * March 31, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J

. Memorandum Concurring Opinion

by Willson, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accorda nce with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2327 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2327

        To suspend temporarily the duty on Antarctic krill oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on Antarctic krill oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANTARCTIC KRILL OIL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Antarctic krill     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        oil, in bulk, not                                                  31/2011.......
                        chemically
                        modified, not
                        containing lipids
                        from any other
                        sources (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3824.90.40)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 104

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the ongoing prosecution 
               of 13 members of Iran's Jewish community.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2000

   Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
    Lieberman, and Mr. Feingold) submitted the following concurrent 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the ongoing prosecution 
               of 13 members of Iran's Jewish community.

Whereas on the eve of the Jewish holiday of Passover in 1999, 13 Jews, including 
        community and religious leaders in the cities of Shiraz and Isfahan, 
        were arrested by the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran and 
        accused of spying for the United States and Israel;
Whereas no evidence has been brought forth to substantiate these arrests, and no 
        formal charges have been lodged after more than a year of consideration;
Whereas the Secretary of State has identified the case of the 13 Jews in Shiraz 
        as ``one of the barometers of U.S.-Iran relations'';
Whereas countless nations have expressed their concern for these individuals and 
        especially their human rights under the rule of law;
Whereas Iran must show signs of respecting human rights as a prerequisite for 
        improving its relationship with the United States; and
Whereas President Khatami was elected on a platform of moderation and reform: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of the Congress that the Clinton Administration 
should--
            (1) condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the arrest 
        and continued prosecution of the 13 Iranian Jews;
            (2) demand that these fabricated charges be dropped 
        immediately and individuals released forthwith; and
            (3) ensure that Iran's treatment of this case is a 
        benchmark for determining the nature of current and future 
        United States-Iran relations.
                                 <all>
```
#### Oneidas B. DUFRENE and Verna Doucet Dufrene v. Evans CHOUEST, et al.

No. 87-00322.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Chouest, Evans; Calíais, Marion E.; Martin, Elizabeth E.; Bergeron, Sherry E.; Hoffpauir, Alice; Chouest, Rema; Chouest, Abdon; Chouest, Luke; Sevin, Doris E.; Vaughan, Cathy D.; Daigle, Darren, Chouest, Marie Gambarelle Mrs.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85 CA 1056; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 50728.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 318.

Denied.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 06-50833

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JESUS SALVADOR ALVAREZ-ANIMA,

Defendant-Appellant.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

---------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

extend time to file appellee’s brief for 30 days from this

court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

DENIED as unnecessary.