alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           MFN FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Twelve         Nine
                                                     Months Ended  Months Ended
                                                     Dec. 31, 2000 Dec. 31, 1999
                                                     ------------- -------------
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>
BASIC
  Net income........................................  $    19,116   $    20,529
  Average common shares outstanding.................   10,000,002    10,000,000
  Earnings per common share before extraordinary
   credit...........................................  $      1.84   $      1.90
  Extraordinary gain from early retirement of debt..         0.07          0.15
                                                      -----------   -----------
  Earnings per common share.........................  $      1.91   $      2.05
                                                      ===========   ===========
DILUTED
  Net income........................................  $    19,116   $    20,529
  Average common shares and common stock equivalents
   outstanding......................................   10,002,399    10,000,661
  Earnings per common share before extraordinary
   credit...........................................  $      1.84   $      1.90
  Extraordinary gain from early retirement of debt..         0.07          0.15
                                                      -----------   -----------
  Earnings per common share.........................  $      1.91   $      2.05
                                                      ===========   ===========
</TABLE>

   Due to the Company's emergence from the Voluntary Case and the
implementation of Fresh Start Reporting, the presentation of earnings per share
for the Predecessor Company is not meaningful.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 102

 To commend the bravery and honor of the citizens of Remy, France, for 
their actions with respect to Lieutenant Houston Braly and to recognize 
 the efforts of the 364th Fighter Group to raise funds to restore the 
               stained glass windows of a church in Remy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 4, 2000

Mrs. Feinstein submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To commend the bravery and honor of the citizens of Remy, France, for 
their actions with respect to Lieutenant Houston Braly and to recognize 
 the efforts of the 364th Fighter Group to raise funds to restore the 
               stained glass windows of a church in Remy.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
Whereas on August 2, 1944, a squadron of P-51s from the United States 364th 
        Fighter Group strafed a German munitions train in Remy, France;
Whereas the resulting explosion killed Lieutenant Houston Braly, one of the 
        attacking pilots, and destroyed much of the village of Remy, including 7 
        stained glass windows in the 13th century church;
Whereas despite threats of reprisals from the occupying German authorities, the 
        citizens of Remy recovered Lieutenant Braly's body from the wreckage, 
        buried his body with dignity and honor in the church's cemetery, and 
        decorated the grave site daily with fresh flowers;
Whereas on Armistice Day, 1995, the village of Remy renamed the crossroads near 
        the site of Lieutenant Braly's death in his honor;
Whereas the surviving members of the 364th Fighter Group desire to express their 
        gratitude to the brave citizens of Remy; and
Whereas to express their gratitude, the surviving members of the 364th Fighter 
        Group have organized a nonprofit corporation to raise funds through its 
        project ``Windows for Remy'' to restore the church's stained glass 
        windows: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) commends the bravery and honor of the citizens of Remy, 
        France, for their actions with respect to the American fighter 
        pilot Lieutenant Houston Braly, during and after August 1944; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the efforts of the surviving members of the 
        United States 364th Fighter Group to raise funds to restore the 
        stained glass windows of Remy's 13th century church.
                                 <all>
```
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00249-CR

__________________

IN RE BENNIE RAY JOHNSON

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

221st District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-07-09863-CR

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an original petition for a writ of mandamus, Bennie Ray Johnson complains 

that he has been held in jail on a charge of burglary of a habitation following a 

probable cause hearing based upon the arresting officer’s police report and not upon 

a complaint signed by the victim of the burglary. Johnson failed to provide any 

supporting documentation with his mandamus petition. Additionally, “[i]t is well 

settled that an information may be predicated upon a complaint or affidavit made 
2

upon information and belief.” Catchings v. State, 285 S.W.2d 233, 344 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1955). 

Release from confinement in a criminal case is obtained through habeas 

corpus, over which this Court lacks original jurisdiction. See Tex. Code. Crim. Proc. 

Ann. arts. 11.01, 11.05 (West 2015). Furthermore, to the extent his petition seeks 

relief against the Montgomery County District Attorney’s Office and the 

Montgomery County Sheriff’s Office, or the officials holding those offices, we lack 

mandamus jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2018). To 

the extent that he seeks mandamus relief against the Judge of the 221st District Court 

of Montgomery County, Johnson has failed to show that he is entitled to the relief 

sought. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (relator must file with petition “a certified or 

sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and 

that was filed in any underlying proceeding[]”). Accordingly, we deny the petition 

for a writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 20, 2019

Opinion Delivered August 21, 2019

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Services Partners Acquisition
      Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2007 (the
‘‘Report’’), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Rahul Prakash, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      March 19, 2007




By: /s/
      Rahul
      Prakash


Rahul
      Prakash


Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2250

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bispyribac-sodium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bispyribac-sodium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BISPYRIBAC-SODIUM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bispyribac-sodium) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frank JONES.

No. 88-KK-3091.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-2149; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 327-698.

Not considered. Not timely filed.
#### STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. James LENARD, Respondent.

No. 67846.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 5, 1986.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, for petitioner.

*30Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Approved. *State v. Jones,*485 So.2d 1283 (Fla.1986); *State v. Safford,*484 So.2d 1244 (Fla.1986); *State v. Castillo,*486 So.2d 565 (Fla.1986).

BOYD, C.J., and ADKINS, OVERTON, McDonald, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 44

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative postage stamp

should be issued in honor of the U.S.S. New Jersey and all those

who served aboard her.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 19, 1999

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself and Mr. TORRICELLI) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that a commemorative

postage stamp should be issued in honor of the U.S.S.

New Jersey and all those who served aboard her.

Whereas the Iowa Class Battleship, the U.S.S. New Jersey

(BB–62), is the most decorated warship in United States

naval history, with 16 battle stars and 20 citations, medals, and ribbons during her 56 years of service;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey was launched on December

7, 1942, by the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard; sponsored

by Mrs. Charles Edison, wife of then-Governor Edison of

New Jersey, former Secretary of the Navy; and commissioned at Philadelphia on May 23, 1943, Captain Carl F.

Holden in command;
2

•SCON 44 IS

Whereas her first action as a flagship for Admiral William

‘‘Bull’’ Halsey’s Third Fleet was a bold 2-day surface

and air strike by her task force against the supposedly

impregnable Japanese fleet base on Truk in the Caroline

Islands, thereby interdicting Japanese naval retaliation in

response to the conquest of the Marshall Islands;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey provided crucial firepower

for the assault on Iwo Jima;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey gave the same crucial service

for the first major aircraft carrier raid on Tokyo;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey’s guns opened the first shore

bombardment in Korea at Wonsan, and served with distinction throughout the remainder of the Korean conflict;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey participated in bombardment

and fire support missions along the Vietnamese coast

during the Vietnam era;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey earned the Navy Unit Commendation for Vietnam service, received 9 battle stars for

World War II, 4 for the Korean conflict, and 3 for the

Vietnam era;

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey supported the Marine operation with the Multinational Peacekeeping Force in Beirut, Lebanon;

Whereas, in 1991, the U.S.S. New Jersey became the first

United States battleship to enter and operate in the Persian Gulf; and

Whereas the U.S.S. New Jersey, after being decommissioned

on February 8, 1991, and due in no small part to the

efforts of the U.S.S. New Jersey Battleship Foundation,

will be heading home in the fall of 1999 to become a
3

•SCON 44 IS

floating monument and an educational museum: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of the Congress that—

3 (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be

4 issued by the United States Postal Service in honor

5 of the U.S.S. New Jersey and all those who served

6 aboard her; and

7 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee

8 should recommend to the Postmaster General that

9 such a postage stamp be issued.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60868

Summary Calendar

GUIFEN HU,

Petitioner

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A087 603 756

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guifen Hu is a native and citizen of China who entered this country 

legally but overstayed. She petitions this court for review of an order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) 

determination that she was not entitled to asylum, withholding of removal, or 

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT) because she was not 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 25, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60868 Document: 00513967529 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2017
No. 15-60868

2

credible. She argues that she can explain the discrepancies and omissions that 

resulted in the adverse credibility finding and asserts her entitlement to relief.

We “review only the BIA’s decision, unless the IJ’s decision has some 

impact on” that decision. Wang v. Holder, 569 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir. 2009). 

We review the factual determination that an alien is not eligible for asylum, 

withholding of removal, or CAT relief under the substantial evidence standard. 

See Chen v. Gonzales, 470 F.3d 1131, 1134 (5th Cir. 2006). Under this

standard, we may not reverse an immigration court’s factual findings unless 

“the evidence was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could conclude 

against it.” Wang, 569 F.3d at 537.

An adverse credibility determination may be supported by “any

inconsistency or omission,” provided that “the totality of the circumstances 

establishes that an asylum applicant is not credible.” Id. at 538 (internal 

quotation marks and citation omitted). Our review of the record as a whole 

shows that the evidence does not compel a conclusion contrary to that reached 

by the IJ and BIA on the issue whether Hu was credible. See id. at 537-40. As 

Hu has not presented credible evidence showing that she is entitled to asylum, 

she has not shown that she is entitled to withholding of removal or relief under 

the CAT. See Dayo v. Holder, 687 F.3d 653, 658-59 (5th Cir. 2012). 

Consequently, her petition for review is DENIED. 

 Case: 15-60868 Document: 00513967529 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2017
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67531-67532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Memorandum of Agreement for Replacing the Griffin--
Spalding County Airport (6A2), Griffin, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Memorandum of Agreement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has entered into a Memorandum of Agreement for 
replacing the Griffin--Spalding County

[[Page 67532]]

Airport (6A2), in Griffin, Georgia with the City of Griffin, Spalding 
County, and the Griffin-Spalding County Airport Authority. This 
Agreement sets forth the parties' obligations and commitments with 
regard to planning and constructing a replacement airport.

DATES: December 15, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Larry F. Clark, Manager, Federal 
Aviation Administration, Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 
Columbia Ave., Campus Building, Suite 2-260, College Park, GA 30337.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 28, 2014, the City of Griffin and 
Spalding County, herein referred to as the Sponsor, and the Griffin-
Spalding County Airport Authority entered into a Memorandum of 
Agreement (Agreement) with the FAA for replacing the Griffin-Spalding 
County Airport (6A2) in Griffin, Georgia. This Agreement sets forth the 
parties' obligations and commitments with regard to planning and 
constructing a replacement airport and outlines the process the parties 
will undertake to decommission 6A2 in the future. Prior to 
decommissioning 6A2, the FAA will provide notice and an opportunity for 
public comment as required by 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).
    On September 26, 2014, the Federal Aviation Administration added 
the proposed Griffin-Spalding County Replacement Airport to its 
National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems. The runway length and 
airport design at the existing airport are insufficient to support 
aviation needs. The sponsor evaluated all reasonable and practicable 
alternatives to address these constraints and proposed construction of 
the replacement airport to the FAA. The FAA issued a Finding of No 
Significant Impact/Record of Decision for the proposed replacement 
airport on March 12, 2013.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the Agreement in person at 
the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect 
the Agreement, notice and other documents determined by the FAA to be 
related to the Agreement in person at the Griffin-Spalding County 
Airport, 1035 Hill Street, Griffin, GA 30224.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on November 5, 2014.
Larry F. Clark,
Manager, FAA Atlanta Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-26800 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Laura E. Purdy, Deceased.

Surrogate's Court, Westchester County,

December 4, 1958.

*Warren W. Wells*for petitioner.

*William R. Gondit*for executors and trustees.

John J. Dillon, S.

The testatrix directed that her entire residuary estate be divided into five equal shares and that one of such shares be held in trust and the income therefrom be paid to John W. Havery, her son, for life and upon his death the trust terminate and the remainder thereof he paid in equal shares to his surviving children.

The decree settling the trustees’ intermediate accounting proceeding recited the fact that John W. Havery was indebted to the estate in the sum of $3,250, and such decree provided that the income from the trust created for his benefit be divided equally among the five residuary beneficiaries until the debt was satisfied. John W. Havery died on August 30, 1958, survived by two sons, both of whom now seek distribution of the remainder of the trust created under article “eerth” (d) of the will. The trustees have interposed an answering affidavit in which they contend that all of the persons having a vested or contingent right to share in the division of the income as provided for in the decree settling the trustees’ intermediate account, are *531necessary parties to this proceeding since there still remains an unpaid balance on the aforesaid debt.

The language of the will is clear and unequivocal and the court determines that the trust created under article *“*fifth ” (d) has now terminated. There is no basis upon which to sustain the contention that the residuary beneficiaries can be adversely affected by a distribution of the trust principal, since such trust has terminated and since the trustees have not asserted any estate claim against the remaindermen. On the next accounting proceeding, in which the trustees will render a final accounting with respect to the trust created under article *“*fifth *”*(d), any and all questions relating to the manner in which the indebtedness of John W. Ha very has been handled will be resolved.

Accordingly, the trustees are directed to distribute the remainder of the trust to the two surviving sons of the income beneficiary in accordance with the express directions of article *“*fifth ” (d) of the will.

Settle decree.