alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under the Home Owners' Loan Act (HOLA) (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*), and Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238) or Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is described in §§ 238.53 or 238.54 of Regulation LL (12 CFR 238.53 or 238.54) or § 239.8 of Regulation MM (12 CFR 239.8). Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 10a(c)(4)(B) of HOLA (12.U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)).

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 19, 2012.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond**                     (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:                

                    1.                     *HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc., Clyde, North Carolina,*                     to become a savings and loan holding company upon the conversion of HomeTrust Bank, Clyde, North Carolina, from a mutual to stock form.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 20, 2012.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-7115 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ELIJAH WEIR,

Petitioner

v.

PHILA. CT. OF COMMON PLEAS; PHILA.

DIST. ATTY'S OFFICE,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 92 EM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26 th day of February , 2024, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the “Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Habeas

Corpus Relief” is DENIED.
#### Jimmy Dale TAYLOR v. STATE of Mississippi

No. 57327.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 27, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1987.

Gene Barton, Tupelo, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by Leyser Q. Morris, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lee County; Thomas J. Gardner, III, Judge.

Before WALKER, C.J., and DAN M. LEE and PRATHER, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### The Snare and Triest Company, Appellant, *v.*The City of New York, Respondent.

*Snare & Triest Co.*v. *City of New*York, 158 App. Div. 928, affirmed.

(Argued March 9, 1910;

decided March 24, 1910.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the' Supreme Court hi the first judicial department, entered November 21, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee. The action is brought by plaintiff, as assignee of Maryland Steel Company, to recover about $36,000 on three causes of action, viz.: (a) To recover damages for being compelled to excavate and build a number of pier foundations many feet below those shown on contract plans and drawings prepared by the defendant; (b) to recover on *quantum meruit*a very considerable amount for extra work upon the theory and claim that plaintiff was induced to do the work by promises and agreements of persons and representatives of the defendant with whom it had been constantly dealing, to give it proper orders when the work was done, such orders being "withheld and refused after the doing of the same; (c) that the defendant, arbitrarily and without lawful or legal right, canceled the building of a rubble stone wall called for by the contract and, by duress of goods or in order that plaintiff might get its regular and proper payments, compelled it to allow the defendant a rebate of $2,600 for this wall and of $216 for another piece of work.

*Hector M. Hitchings*for appellant;

*Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel (William E. C. Mayer*and *Terence Farley*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 10224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03892]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8643]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Jasper Johns: Regrets'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Jasper Johns: Regrets,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about March 15, 2014, until on or 
about September 1, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 12, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-03892 Filed 2-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### Kaylynn Kathleen Kern CONNER v. James Sidney CONNER.

No. 87-CC-0202.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Conner, Kaylynn Kathleen Kern; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition or mandamus; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, Nos. 64479, 57317; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW-86-1566.

Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeal for briefing, argument and opinion.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH AIDA HASKELL;

REGINALD ENTO; JEFFREY

PATRICK LYONS JR.; AAKASH

DESAI, on behalf of themselves and

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney

General of California; EVA

STEINBERGER, Assistant Bureau

Chief for DNA Programs, California

Department of Justice,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-15152

D.C. No. 3:09-cv-04779-CRB

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 35(a) and Circuit Rule 

35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any

court of the Ninth Circuit.

FILED

JUL 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Page 2

Judges Nguyen, Watford and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations

or vote as to whether the case should be taken en banc.
**EXHIBIT          32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |                                                   |                                 |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|         | **AMERICAN                    TELECOM SERVICES, INC.** |
|    |                                              |                            |
|         | By:                                          | /s/ Bruce                  Hahn |
|         | **Bruce                  Hahn**                        |
|         | Chief                  Executive Officer               |

|         |                                     |                                   |
|--------------|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|         |                                     |
|    |                                |                              |
|         | By:                            | /s/ Edward                  James |
|         | **Edward                  James**        |
|         | Chief                  Financial Officer |
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. J. RES. 18

Honoring the World War II crewmembers of the U.S.S. Alabama on the

occasion of the 1999 annual reunion of the U.S.S. Alabama Crewmen’s

Association.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 13, 1999

Mr. SHELBY (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

JOINT RESOLUTION

Honoring the World War II crewmembers of the U.S.S.

Alabama on the occasion of the 1999 annual reunion

of the U.S.S. Alabama Crewmen’s Association.

Whereas the members of the crew of the battleship U.S.S.

Alabama (BB–60) during World War II were a courageous group who braved both Arctic chill and Pacific heat

to help defend our great country against enemy oppression;

Whereas the U.S.S. Alabama crewed by those men was

awarded nine battle stars and shot down 22 enemy aircraft; and
2

•SJ 18 IS

Whereas the U.S.S. Alabama Crewmen’s Association is holding its annual reunion on April 15 to 18, 1999: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMENDATION AND RECOGNITION OF CREW4 MEN OF THE U.S.S. ALABAMA.

5 The United States honors the 6,300 persons who

6 were members of the U.S.S. Alabama’s crew during World

7 War II, commends and thanks them for their sacrifice and

8 service in the defense of the United States, and recognizes

9 those among them who are assembling April 15 to 18,

10 1999, as the U.S.S. Alabama Crewmen’s Association on

11 the occasion of the association’s 1999 annual reunion.

Æ
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00290

- CR

Frank Anthony CASTILLO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3014

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED June 5, 2019.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
##### 



EXHIBIT 32(a)
TO FORM 10-K OF
SEA PINES ASSOCIATES, INC.

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Sea Pines
Associates, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 28, 2004
    
    /s/ Michael E. LawrenceMichael E. Lawrence
Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2465 

To reduce temporarily the duty on arrangements of artificial flowers of 

man-made fibers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on arrangements of artificial 

flowers of man-made fibers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARRANGEMENTS OF ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF 

4 MAN-MADE FIBERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Arrangements of artificial 

flowers of man-made fibers 

(provided for in subheading 

6702.90.35) ........................... 5% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2465 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration 

# Part 23 Reorganization Overview

EASA Aircraft Certification Service(AIR) June 10, 2015Federal Aviation Administration 

### • The FAA can not share drafts of rulemaking documents or any supporting/guidance materials after the rulemaking action plan (RAP) is approved.

• The FAA can brief another aviation authority on any significant changes to a rulemaking to support harmonization efforts.

• If the FAA engages in any communication with another aviation authority after RAP approval, and receives significant information and argument on the merits of the rule, the FAA will provide a written summary of those communications in the rulemaking docket

.Federal Aviation Administration 

# History of Part 23 Reorganization

• 2009 - Part 23 certification process study (CPS)

• 2011 - FAA established an ARC based on CPS

• Included participants from foreign / domestic avionics manufacturers and industry groups, and multiple Civil Aviation Authorities

• ARC recommendations received May 2012:

• Increase ability to adopt new technology

• Revise CFRs into safety/performance based requirements

• Move more prescriptive means of compliance into internationally accepted industry standards

• Incorporate CS

- VLA as the entry level Part 23 airplane to encourage manufacturers to move from LSA and Experimental into Part 23.



### • 2013
– Statutory requirement to issue a final rule based on Part 23 ARC recommendations by 12/31/2015

• R ulemaking application approved in September 2013

• Rulemaking Action Plan (RAP) approved in December 2014


### 3Federal Aviation Administration EASA CS

- 23 Rulemaking 

## Part 23 Reorganization
– What Are We Doing?

Part 23 Rulemaking

Industry Standard Development

- ASTM
Foreign Authorities

• Transport Canada

• Brazil CAA

• Chinese CAA

• New Zealand CAAFederal Aviation Administration 

# Part 23 Status - Schedule

• Current : Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) under development.

• December 2015 : Anticipated publication of NPRM

• December 2017 : Anticipated publication of Final RuleFederal Aviation Administration 

# Part 23 Status Updates / Changes

• Since approval of the RAP, and the reg text that was presented at the ASTM meeting in XXX, the following changes have been made:

• Removed prescriptive details in the following subparts:

• Subpart D

— Design and Construction

• Subpart E

— Powerplant



### • Minor wording changes to ensure legal sufficiency

• For example: removed minimize and appropriate



### • No change to intentFederal Aviation Administration 

# CS - 23 A - NPA

• General agreement with the philosophy expressed in the A

- NPA

• Specific comments:

• Subpart E

– concerns that this section is still too prescriptive (e.g., CS 23.500 Powerplant installation specifications)

• Subpart F

– concerns with adding former guidance into the rule language (e.g., CS 23.605 System and equipment failure specifications).Federal Aviation Administration 

# Back - up SlidesFederal Aviation Administration 

# Safety Continuum
#### Dora H. BRADY and Stephen Brady v. STATE of Louisiana, Through the LOUISIANA HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION.

No. 88-C-0799.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 1988.

In re Brady, Dora H.; Brady, Stephen; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-0189; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 138710.

*1047Prior report: La.App., 525 So.2d 102.

Denied.

WATSON, J., concurs being of the opinion that worker’s compensation may be available.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 154 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 154

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas in 1982, after a period of 28 years, the Congress of the United States 
        resumed the United States commemorative coin programs;
Whereas since 1982, 37 of the Nation's worthy institutions, organizations, 
        foundations, and programs have been commemorated under the coin 
        programs;
Whereas since 1982, the Nation's coin collectors have purchased nearly 
        49,000,000 commemorative coins that have yielded nearly $1,800,000,000 
        in revenue and more than $407,000,000 in surcharges benefitting a 
        variety of deserving causes;
Whereas the United States Capitol has benefitted from the commemorative coin 
        surcharges that have supported such commendable projects as the 
        restoration of the Statue of Freedom atop the Capitol dome, the 
        furtherance of the development of the United States Capitol Visitor 
        Center, and the planned National Garden at the United States Botanic 
        Gardens on the Capitol grounds;
Whereas surcharges from the year 2000 coin program commemorating the Library of 
        Congress bicentennial benefit the Library of Congress bicentennial 
        programs, educational outreach activities (including schools and 
        libraries), and other activities of the Library of Congress; and
Whereas the United States Capitol Visitor Center commemorative coin program will 
        commence in January 2001, with the surcharges designated to further 
        benefit the Capitol Visitor Center: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress of the 
United States acknowledges and salutes the ongoing generosity, loyalty, 
and significant role that coin collectors have played in supporting our 
Nation's meritorious charitable organizations, foundations, 
institutions, and programs, including the United States Capitol, the 
Library of Congress, and the United States Botanic Gardens.

            Passed the Senate October 23 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 154

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    To acknowledge and salute the contributions of coin collectors.
```
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

New Hampshire Thrift
Bancshares, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-31737, No. 333-66305, and No.
333-115591) on Form S-8 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March 26, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 which report appears in the Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.

/s/ Shatswell,
MacLeod & Company, P.C.

SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.

West Peabody, Massachusetts

March 26, 2010





LOGO
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date:
              May 11,
              2007By:
            /s/ Rick
              M.
              StreetRick
                M. Street