alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert A. Stang, Appellant, v Rosaleen A. Stang, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated January 15, 1982, the plaintiff husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered November 8, 1989, which denied his motion to terminate his maintenance and child support obligations and granted the defendant wife’s cross motion for arrears in maintenance and child support, and awarded her counsel fees, without a hearing, in the amount of $3,000.

Ordered that the ordér is modified by deleting the provision awarding counsel fees in the amount of $3,000; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the defendant wife, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for a hearing and new determination as to the amount of counsel fees to be awarded to the wife’s attorney pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (c).

We agree with the Supreme Court’s determination that the *813wife was entitled to an award of maintenance and support arrears pursuant to the terms of the parties’ separation agreement which was incorporated, but not merged, into the judgment of divorce. We also conclude that the court was required to award a counsel fee to the wife’s attorney pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (c). However, an evidentiary hearing must be held so that the extent and value of counsel’s services can be scrutinized in an adversarial context by the trial court and intelligently reviewed by this one *(see, Gutin v Gutin,*155 AD2d 586, 587). We note that a showing of financial need is not a prerequisite for an award of counsel fees pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 237 (c), and contrary to the husband’s contention, the wife was not required to submit a current statement of net worth *(see,*22 NYCRR 202.16 [g]) on such an application.

We have examined the husband’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. We also find that sanctions against the husband are not warranted herein. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16026-16027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-61-002]


Cargill Power Markets, LLC v. Public Service Company of New 
Mexico; Notice of Compliance Filing

    Take notice that on March 12, 2012, Public Service Company of New 
Mexico and Cargill Power Markets, LLC submitted a compliance filing to 
modify the standard of review in the settlement agreement, pursuant to 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Order 
Conditionally Approving Contested Settlement, issued December 30, 2011, 
137 FERC ]61,259 (2011).
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or

[[Page 16027]]

protests must be filed on or before the comment date. Anyone filing a 
motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on 
the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#165053445559787a7f787345636666796462567073647538717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d99f9c8b9a96b7b5b0b7bc8aaca9a9b6abad99bfbcabbaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 3, 2012.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6524 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hair Therapists, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Doreen
E. Zimmerman,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Doreen E. Zimmerman
---------------------------
    Doreen E. Zimmerman
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer

Date  October 28, 2005
      ----------------

<PAGE>
----

----

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February      13, 2008 | /s/       Richard      R. Ivanovick                  |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |           Richard R. Ivanovick, C. A. |
|                   |           Chief Financial Officer     |

----
#### Walter LAMB, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2117.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 8, 1988.

Michael Allen, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and A.E. Pooser, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant’s sentence has expired, appellee moves to dismiss this appeal as moot. However, as appellant points out, the issues to be raised on appeal challenge the legality of the conviction, rather than the sentence. The-possibility of removing the stigma of a conviction represents a significant practical purpose demonstrating the continuing viability of the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.




Date: November 12,
      2010
              By:
              /s/ Liu
      ChuanjieName:
              Liu
      ChuanjieTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Financial andAccounting
      Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typedform within the electronic
version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and
furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




                                  CERTIFICATION
                          ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-K REPORT
                         OF COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            (CHAPTER 63, TITLE 18 U.S.C. SUB-SECTION 1350(A) AND (B))

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chapter 63,Title
18 U.S.C. sub-sections 1350(a) and (b)), each of the undersigned hereby
certifies that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2003 of Collins & Aikman Corporation (the "Company") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or a Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 16, 2004                                      /s/ David A. Stockman
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                               David A. Stockman
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: March 16, 2004                                       /s/ J. Michael Stepp
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                                J. Michael Stepp
                                       Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Supreme Court No. DA 20 - 0079

__________________________________________________________________ STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CODY RAYMOND SACKS, Defendant and Appellant.

__________________________________________________________________

**GRANT OF EXTENSION OF TIME**

__________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until May 13 , 2020 to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s Reply Brief. DATED this 1st day of April, 2020.

__________________________ _ Clerk of the Supre me Court

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 1 2020

04/01/2020 Case Number: DA 20-0079
#### In re the Matter of Attorney General William J. GUSTE, Jr., Superceding the District Attorney of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.

No. 89-KK-0921.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 24, 1989.

In re Bush, Bryan E. Jr.; — Other(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of mandamus, prohibition, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, *904Div. “C”, No. 12-88-103; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 0271.

Denied.

COLE, J., recused.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO956000.L14200000 BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plats; Colorado.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the filing of the land survey plats listed below.

# DATES:

The plats described in this notice were filed on March 12, 2012.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093.

      ( print page 17500)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The supplemental plat of Sections 32 and 33, in Township 12 South, Range 90 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was accepted and filed on March 12, 2012.

The supplemental plat of Section 5, in Township 13 South, Range 90 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was accepted and filed on March 12, 2012.

Randy Bloom,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.

[FR Doc. 2012-7143 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
#### Rosiland SPENCER v. HOWARD, WEIL, LABOUISSE & FRIEDRICHS INC.

No. 89-C-1225.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Spencer, Rosiland; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CA-0002; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 88-8185.

Prior report: La.App., 543 So.2d 547.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 8, 2007 /s/ ALAN D. GOLD   Alan D. Gold   Chief Executive Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of BioMed Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly periodended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 8, 2007 /s/ KENT GRIFFIN   Kent Griffin   Chief Financial Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CLIFFORD GILLIE

VERSUS

KEVIN GILLIE

NO. 2020 CW 0046

MARCH 2, 2022

In Re: Kevin J. Gillie, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 686006. 

BEFORE: McDONALD, THERIOT, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DISMISSED AS MOOT. Pursuant to the minutes of the

district court provided to this court, it appears the writ

application is moot, and therefore, this writ is dismissed. 

JMM

MRT

WRC

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

r 

D UTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### STATE ex rel. Gary BENOIT v. 17th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 87-KH-0256.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Benoit, Gary; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”.

Denied. Moot.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 128

To urge the Nobel Commission to award the Nobel Prize for Peace to

His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, for his dedication to fostering peace

throughout the world.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 30, 2000

Mr. SANTORUM submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To urge the Nobel Commission to award the Nobel Prize

for Peace to His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, for his

dedication to fostering peace throughout the world.

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, has worked tirelessly and as much as any other world leader to bring

peace to regions of the world which have known strife, intolerance, and violence for far too long;

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, knows the persecution of oppression, having studied for the priesthood in

secrecy and having seen those he grew up with killed and

victimized due to the Nazi Occupation, and later witnessing firsthand the communist subjugation of his native Poland;
2

•SCON 128 IS

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, since his installment as Cardinal of the Church, has traveled more extensively throughout the world than any predecessor, spreading his message of peace, religious freedom, and human

dignity;

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, was instrumental

in the demise of communism in his native Poland, which

in turn fostered the spread of democracy throughout the

world;

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, has reached out

in an unprecedented manner to people of other beliefs

and religions to establish a dialog which may lead to

greater understanding, healing, and harmony, including

praying for unity among Christian churches, reaching out

towards a reconciliation with the Jewish people, and specifically acknowledging those times the Catholic Church

has failed to act in accordance with its teachings;

Whereas in March of this year, His Holiness, Pope John

Paul II, led a historic pilgrimage to the Middle East, including Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinian territories,

preaching coexistence, peace, tolerance, and goodwill

throughout this historically conflicted territory; and

Whereas His Holiness, Pope John Paul II, has used his position as a world leader to become the foremost voice to

foster ties of brotherhood and for the promotion of peace

and reconciliation in the world today: Now, therefore, be

it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress urges the Nobel Commis-
3

•SCON 128 IS

1 sion to award the Nobel Prize for Peace to His Holiness,

2 Pope John Paul II.

Æ
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                       Subsidiaries of DRAXIS Health Inc.


<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                                      Other Names Under
                                                                                      Which Subsidiary is
Subsidiary                             Jurisdiction of Incorporation                  Doing Business
----------                             -----------------------------                  -------------------
<S>                                    <C>                                            <C>
DRAXIMAGE Inc.                         Canada (CBCA)
DRAXIS Pharma Inc.                     Canada (CBCA)                                  DPI
Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc.           State of Louisiana                             DAHI
DAHI LLC                               State of Delaware
DAHI Nevada Inc.                       State of Nevada
DRAXIS U.S. Inc.                       State of Delaware
DAHI Animal Health (New Zealand) Pty   New Zealand (Companies Act 1993 as a limited
Limited                                liability company)
DAHI Animal Health (UK) Limited        England and Wales (Companies Act 1985 as a
                                       private limited company)
DRAXIMAGE LLC                          State of Delaware
DRAXIMAGE (U.K.) Limited               England and Wales (Companies Act 1985 as a
                                       private limited company)
</Table>
#### STATE ex rel. John E. BORRAS v. Hon. Walter E. KOLLIN, Judge.

No. 88-KH-2469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Borras, John E.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory/remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 81-839.

Denied.