alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 20677 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

HAKIM IBN AHMAD , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11

- CR

- 679

- 5

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Hakim Ibn Ahmad has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Ahmad has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and t he relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Ahmad ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 2, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-20677 Document: 00512853702 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/02/2014No. 13

- 20677

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-20677 Document: 00512853702 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2014
Exhibit 99.2




				Exhibit 99(ii)

			    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
				 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek  Oil  Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB/A for  the  quarter ended  June  30, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Jason F. Griffith, Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of  operations of  the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: September 2, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

# Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bremer Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert
B. Buck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. |  | The
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or           15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all           material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the           Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: |                                                                   | March 25, 2005 |  |  | /s/   Robert B. Buck | 
|------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- |  |  | -------------------- | 
|       |                                                                   |                | 
|       | Robert B. BuckChief Financial OfficerBremer Financial Corporation |
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 138

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas human progress in the 21st century will depend

upon global understanding and cooperation in finding

positive solutions to hunger and violence;

Whereas the turn of the millennium offers unparalleled opportunity for humanity to examine its past, set goals for

the future, and establish new patterns of behavior;

Whereas the people of the United States and the world observed the day designated by the United Nations General

Assembly as ‘‘One Day in Peace, January 1, 2000’’

(General Assembly Resolution 54/29);

Whereas the example set on that day ought to be recognized

globally and repeated each year;

Whereas the people of the United States seek to establish

better relations with one another and with the people of

all countries; and

Whereas celebration by the breaking of bread together traditionally has been the means by which individuals, societies, and nations join together in peace: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—
2

SCON 138 ES

1 (1) each year should begin with a day of peace

2 and sharing during which—

3 (A) people around the world should gather

4 with family, friends, neighbors, their faith com5 munity, or people of another culture to pledge

6 nonviolence in the new year and to share in a

7 celebratory new year meal; and

8 (B) Americans who are able should match

9 or multiply the cost of their new year meal with

10 a timely gift to the hungry at home or abroad

11 in a tangible demonstration of a desire for in12 creased friendship and sharing among people

13 around the world; and

14 (2) the President should issue a proclamation

15 each year calling on the people of the United States

16 and interested organizations to observe such a day

17 with appropriate programs and activities.

Passed the Senate October 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 138

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that a day of

peace and sharing should be established at thebeginning of each year.
EXHIBIT 31.1

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

     I, Evon Au hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q-SB of Thai One On,
Inc. and its wholly-owned Subsidiary, Thai Pasta Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.

2. Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by the quarterly report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in the quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects our financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows as of, and for, the periods presented in the quarterly report.

4. The other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to Thai One On, Inc.,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter
(fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) Thai One On, Inc.'s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to our auditors and the audit committee of our
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in our internal control over
financial reporting.
                                   THAI ONE ON, INC., Registrant

Dated: November 1, 2005                /s/ Evon Au
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   By: Evon Au, Chief Executive Officer,
                                   President and Chairman of the Board
50328.

#### SCHLOTH v. SMITH.

Evans, Judge.

On November 5, 1974, William J. Schloth was the Republican nominee for Judge of the Superior Court of the Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit. Schloth lost the election to the incumbent, and on November 18, 1974, he filed a contest to this election. Code Ann. § 34-1705 requires a contest of an election to be filed in the proper court within five days after the official consolidation of the returns of that particular office and certification thereof by the election official having responsibility for taking such action.

Code Ann. § 34-203 (d) requires that the State Election Board be served with a copy of the proceeding.

The contest of November 18,1974, was not served on the State Election Board. However, on November 26, 1974, an amendment to this petition was filed with certificate attached showing service on the Chairman of the State Election Board by registered mail on November 25, 1974.

But the returns of the election were canvassed and consolidated for Taylor County on November 6, 1974; Chattahoochee County on November 6, 1974; Muscogee County on November 6, 1974; Talbot County on November 8, 1974; Harris County on November 6, 1974; and Marion County on November 6, 1974.

1. The election contest was not filed within five days after the official consolidation of the returns of that particular office and certification thereof by the election *530official having responsibility for taking such action. See Code Ann. § 34-1705. Compare *Robinson v. Bassett,*128 Ga. App. 711 (197 SE2d 799).

Argued February 25, 1975

Decided April 9, 1975.

William J. Schloth, *pro se.*

*John W. Benney, Michael P. Cielinski,*for appellee.

2. The amendment which was served on the election board was not filed until November 25, 1974, some 17 to 19 days late, at which time the election result was final. Having failed to comply with the statute within five days, and failing to serve same on the election board, there was never any jurisdiction for the contest. See *Smith v. Nathan,*127 Ga. App. 610 (194 SE2d 490); *Robinson v. Bassett,*128 Ga. App. 711 (197 SE2d 799); *Moody v. Carter,*128 Ga. App. 27 (195 SE2d 204); *Price v. Cheek,*130 Ga. App. 506, 507 (203 SE2d 751).

3. The court did not err in dismissing this contest. The election law is in derogation of the common law and must be strictly construed. *Watson v. Thompson,*185 Ga. 402, 407 (195 SE 190); *Foster v. Vickery,*202 Ga. 55, 60 (42 SE2d 117); *Laite v. Stewart,*112 Ga. App. 853 (2, 3, 4) (146 SE2d 553).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Stolz, J., concur.*
#### STATE ex rel. Billy R. ST. CLAIR v. CLERK OF COURT, ORLEANS PARISH.

No. 87-KH-2336.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re St. Clair, Billy R.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ and writ of mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 310-494.

Denied.
Exhibit 99.2




				Exhibit 99(ii)

			    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
				 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek  Oil  Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB for the  quarter ended September 30, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Jason F. Griffith, Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of  operations of  the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 15, 2004
#### SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY v. Ben BAKER, et al.

No. 88-C-0068.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Baker, Ben; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-1067; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84-2619.

*131Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 655.

Denied.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Coda Octopus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
for the period ended April 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Annmarie Gayle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Midgley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated:
July 3, 2019



| | /s/
    Annmarie Gayle                          
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | Annmarie
    Gayle                              
| | Chairman
    and Chief Executive Officer        
| | (Principal
    Executive Officer)               
| |                                                 
| | /s/
    Michael Midgley                         
| | Michael
    Midgley                             
| | Chief
    Financial Officer                     
| | (Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### STATE ex rel. Douglas JOHNSON v. Hayden J. DEES, Warden, Dixon.

No. 88-KH-1200.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Johnson, Douglas; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 4-88-637.

Granted. The Court of Appeal, First Circuit, is ordered to expedite its consideration of the writ transferred in this Court’s docket number 88-0-0953 on April 21, 1988. Since this Court’s transfer, the East Baton Rouge Parish District Attorney’s Office has dismissed the drug charge which formed the basis of relator’s arrest, so the contempt sentence, which relator is due to discharge on August 15, 1988, is the sole basis for his detention.
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of GCJ, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I,
Jeffrey Chad Guidry, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

               (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                     section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934; and

               (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and
                     result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Jeffrey Chad Guidry
---------------------------
    Jeffrey Chad Guidry
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Financial Officer


Date  October 25, 2004
      ----------------



<PAGE>
49347.

#### J. W. A. v. STATE OF GEORGIA.

Decided March 19, 1975.

*Greer, Sartain & Carey, R. Thomas Jarrard,*for *322appellant.

*321Quillian, Judge.

The Supreme Court on certiorari (J. *W. A. v. State of Ga.,*233 Ga. 683) has reversed the judgment of this court in *J. W. A. v. State of Ga.,*133 Ga. App. 102 (210 SE2d 24). In conformity with the mandate of that decision the case is reversed and remanded to the "Juvenile Court of White County for disposition in that court or for de novo transfer hearing to the superior court in accordance with the Juvenile Code.”

*Judgment reversed with direction.*

*Bell, C. J., Pannell, P. J., Deen, P. J., Evans, Stolz, Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur. Clark, J., concurs specially.*

*322
      *Jeff C. Wayne, District Attorney, Kenneth R. Keene,*for appellee.

*Barry B. McGough, John L. Cromartie,*amicus curiae.

Clark, Judge,

concurring specially.

Mirabile dictu! Wonderful indeed it is to state that Academe and Bench are now in agreement as to the solution of the previously persistent perplexing problem as to jurisdiction in delinquency cases of the juvenile court vis-a-vis the superior court. The result of the Supreme Court decision here is conformance with those views expressed in law review articles published by the professors who have taught or are presently teaching the subject of juvenile law at our three accredited law schools. In our previous decision (133 Ga. App. 102 (210 SE2d 24)) we had at page 109 cited articles written by Mercer’s Glen Clark and Emory’s Lucy Henritze McGough and Robert S. Stubbs. To these we now add Georgia’s Professor Samuel M. Davis who covered this subject in detail under the title of "The Jurisdictional Dilemma of the Juvenile Court” in 51 North Carolina Law Review 195 and his recently published book, Rights of Juveniles — The Juvenile Justice System.
Exhibit 32 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of TC X Calibur, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We, Travis T. Jenson, President and Thomas J. Howells, Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| *Date:*** | *03/27/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Travis T. Jenson***                                  |
|-----------|--------------|----------|----------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Travis T. Jenson, President and Director***             |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | * *                                                 |
| *Date:*** | *03/28/06*** | * * | *By:***  | */s/Thomas J. Howells***                                 |
| * *  | * *     | * * | * * | *Thomas J. Howells, Secretary, Treasurer and Director*** |
Exhibit 23(b)

                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference  in this Form 10-K of our report  dated  January 22, 1997  included in
First  Citizens  Financial   Corporation's  (the   "Corporation")   Registration
Statement File Nos. 33-27259,  33-62466 and 33-91612. It should be noted that we
have not audited any  financial  statements  of the  Corporation  subsequent  to
December 31, 1996 or performed  any audit  procedures  subsequent to the date of
our report.


                                       /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 24, 1997
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JAMES LAPINSKI AND 

PATRICIA LAPINSKI,

Appellants,

v. Case No. 5D17-445

GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC, 

GREEN EMERALD HOMES, LLC, 

ALEXANDRIA POINTE HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellees.

________________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Volusia County,

Randell H. Rowe, III, Judge.

James Lapinski and Patricia Lapinski, Port 

Orange, pro se.

Christopher R. Evans and Douglas R. 

Sargent, of Locke Lord LLP, West Palm 

Beach, and Charles P. Gufford, of McCalla 

Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for 

Appellee, Green Tree Servicing, LLC.

Mark P. Stopa, of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa, 

for Appellee, Green Emerald Homes, LLC.

No Appearance for Other Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Appellee, 

Green Tree Servicing, LLC, without further discussion, except that we strike from 
2

paragraph ten of the judgment any reference to the trial court later entering a deficiency 

judgment against Appellants. Appellee agreed to waive the right to pursue any deficiency 

claim against Appellants as part of their settlement to resolve the case below.

FINAL JUDGMENT AFFIRMED, AS MODIFIED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.