alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1338

DIANNA PETERMAN; B.P., A Minor Child,

 Plaintiffs – Appellants,

v.

PAT CAUSEY; ELIZABETH SPILLMAN; MELINDA NORMAN; RICHARD 

GENTRY; ALICIA STORIE; HEATHER HENNESSEE; CASEY PUETT; 

AIMEE FAIRCHILD; JOHN BOYD; ROBERT BRADY; C. V. MORRIS; 

RALPH D. YOUNT; ALAN LECROY; LAURA GENTRY; UNKNOWN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:13-cv-00029-RLV)

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dianna Peterman, B.P., Appellants Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dianna Peterman and B.P., a minor child, appeal the 

district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2006) complaint and remanding child custody proceedings to 

state court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Peterman v. Causey, No. 5:13-cv-00029-RLV (W.D.N.C. Mar. 

8, 2013). We also deny Peterman’s motion for a stay of the 

state court proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. (S)1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Hollis L. Harris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of World Airways,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.(S)1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
          (15 U.S.C. (S)78m); and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
          has been provided to World Airways, Inc and furnished to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

         Date:  3/27/2003

                                         /s/ Hollis L. Harris
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Hollis L. Harris
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
                                         World Airways, Inc.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2375 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work surfaces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work 

surfaces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAUNDRY WORK SURFACES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2375 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Laundry work surfaces, each 

comprising a molded polyvinyl chloride plastic base 

with backguard supply tray 

and having a chemical and 

scratch-resistant synthetic 

rubber work mat insert on 

the top surface, the foregoing 

designed for placement across 

the tops of household frontloading clothes washer and 

dryer pairs to make a single 

work surface (provided for in 

subheading 4016.99.05) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0332 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-130-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000846809
<NAME> MADISON BANCSHARES GROUP LTD
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       7,793,484
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,500,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,010,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,602,493
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,613,597
<LOANS>                                    126,524,770
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,111,817
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,925,863
<DEPOSITS>                                 132,594,518
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            880,953
<LONG-TERM>                                  5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,562,018
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,888,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             147,925,863
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,506,782
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              236,142
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               352,432
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,095,356
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,745,215
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,973,136
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,122,220
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  440,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              6,399,376
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                327,155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     773,517
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                446,362
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   446,362
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    9.15
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,088,946
<LOANS-PAST>                                 2,321,101
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               268,131
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,142,265
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               936,974
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  276,627
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,470
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              440,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,111,817
        

</TABLE>
#### Gary M. BOUGERE, Individually and as Mayor for the City of Harahan v. Thomas B. ANZELMO, Fred Barocco, Karen Ranatza and Tim Walker, Aldermen of the City of Harahan, Individually and in their Official Capacities.

No. 88-C-0047.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Anzelmo, Thomas B.; Barocco, Fred; Ranatza, Karen; Walker, Tim; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-CA-0376; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 340-946.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1121.

Denied.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 152

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 4868) to amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

4 United States to modify temporarily certain rates of duty,

5 to make other technical amendments to the trade laws,

6 and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Rep7 resentatives shall make the following correction:

8 On page 160, line 8, strike ‘‘: and’’ and all that fol9 lows through line 10, and insert a period.

Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 152

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To make a technical correction in the enrollment of

the bill H.R. 4868.
#### Mrs. Jan R. CARTER, et al. v. Emily DEITZ, et al.

No. 88-CC-0299.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Modjeski & Masters; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D”, No. 78-11981; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-0129.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      September 2, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Xu KechengName:
              Xu
      KechengTitle:
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6774]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Hampshire Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New Hampshire Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:30 p.m. (EDT) on Wednesday, April 4, 2012, at the University of New 
Hampshire, 400 Commercial Street, Room 255, Manchester, New Hampshire. 
The purpose of the planning meeting is to consider next steps after 
their January briefing.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, May 4, 
2012. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187d6a77586d6b7b7b6a367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7613041936030515150458111900">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons 
who desire additional information may contact the Eastern Regional 
Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 16, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-6774 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE ex rel. Joseph D. RIDEAUX, Sr. v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-2524.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Rideaux, Joseph D. Sr.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 36026.

Denied. Moot. Hearing held 12/16/87.
----

**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.**

**FORM 10-KSB****/ A**

[ X ]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE  ACTOF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended  **December 31, 2000**

[    ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from  to .

Commission File No.  **33-26787-D**

**iBonZai.com, INC.**(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bremer Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2004 (the Periodic Report), I, Stan K.
Dardis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: | March 18, 2004 | /s/ Stan K. Dardis
Stan K. Dardis
President and
Chief Executive Officer
Bremer Financial Corporation
|------ | -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1989
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1989
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1989
<CASH>                                           3,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         855,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 817,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,798
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     714,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   817,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               440,532
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (440,532)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (440,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                100,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (340,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*LARRY W. TINSLEY

*Donald D. Dakers,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 716 (AC 16992), is denied.

*916
      *Richard F. Jacobson,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 25, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 125 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 125

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, June 29, 2000, Friday, June 30, 2000, or on Saturday, July 1, 
2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, July 10, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on 
the legislative day of Thursday, June 29, 2000, or Friday, June 30, 
2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on 
Monday, July 10, 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate June 28, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 125

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```