alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2240 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2240

  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 
                   measuring or checking instruments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF MEASURING OR CHECKING 
              INSTRUMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Parts and           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          accessories, of                                                    31/2011.......
                          instruments and
                          apparatus for
                          measuring or
                          checking
                          electrical
                          quantities,
                          specially
                          designed for
                          telecommunication
                          s (provided for
                          in subheading
                          9030.90.88), not
                          including
                          subassemblies
                          containing one or
                          more printed
                          circuit
                          assemblies,
                          specially
                          designed for
                          telecommunication
                          s (provided for
                          in subheading
                          9030.90.88)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Presstek, Inc.
Hudson, New Hampshire

We  hereby  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  respective
Prospectuses constituting part of the Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos.
33-80466,  33-61215 and 33-39337) and on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-2299 and 33-48342),
of our report dated February 20, 1998, relating to the financial  statements and
schedule of Presstek, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended January 3, 1998.

We also  consent to the  references  to us under the  caption  "Experts"  in the
Prospectuses.



/s/  BDO Seidman, LLP
-----------------------
BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


New York, New York
March 27, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In
connection with the Annual Report of Presstek, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended January 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Cook, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.


March
      24, 2010
            /s/
      Jeffrey A. CookJeffrey
      A. Cook
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Presstek, Inc. and will be retained by Presstek, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis Anibal ALBERTO a/k/a Alberto Anibal.

No. 89-KO-0320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Alberto, Louis Anibal a/k/a; Anibal, Alberto; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KA-0584; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “N”, No. 87-2026.

Prior report: La.App., 537 So.2d 871.

Denied.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**I, Richard J. Miller, the Chief Financial Officer of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.,certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-QSB of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. [Reserved];  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuers’ other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 5, 2006/s/ Richard J. Miller
#### CAPITAL COPY, INC., Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 87-1842.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 1, 1988.

Jeffrey Solomon of Ferdie & Gouz, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Joseph T. Baron, Jr., Associate General Counsel, University of Florida, Gainesville, for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

Finding appellant Capital Copy, Inc., was provided no clear point of entry into the administrative process, we reverse an order issued by the University of Florida (University), dismissing a bid protest filed by appellant.

Section 120.53(5)(a), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that the notice of decision to accept or reject a bid shall contain the following statement:

> Failure to file a protest within the time prescribed in s. 120.53(5), Florida Statutes, shall constitute a waiver of proceedings under chapter 120, Florida Statutes.

The notice of decision, posted by the University on October 1, 1987, in its bid tabulation, was defective in that it failed to contain the above statutory notice.1 The failure to include the statutory notice, or words of substantially similar effect, in the posted bid tabulation resulted in appellant’s not receiving a clear point of entry to protest the award of the bid to the successful bidder. *See Henry v. State, Department of Administration,*431 So.2d 677, 679 (Fla. *9891st DCA 1983), holding the department’s letter of determination “did not bear the hallmarks of finality required for final orders affecting substantial interests in that it failed to inform appellant of his right to request administrative review and failed to state the time within which he was required to request proceedings under Section 120.57.” *Compare Lamar Advertising Co. v. Department of Transportation,*523 So.2d 712 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), observing that although the department’s notice did not use the term “final agency” action as specifically required in the department’s rule, it did advise applicant that his permit had been denied and that he had the right to request a 120.57 hearing within 30 days of the date of the notice.

In concluding that appellant was never provided a clear point of entry, we find it unnecessary to decide whether appellant’s notice of protest was timely filed.

The order dismissing the bid protest is reversed, the cause is remanded, and the University is directed to allow appellant to pursue its bid protest pursuant to section 120.53(5).

BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

1

. The bid tabulation listed the vendors submitting bids and circled the name of one of the bidders.
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 11, 2013

N o. 04

- 13

- 00454

- CV and 04

- 13

- 00455

- CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTERES T AND PROTECTION OF S.S.,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2013MH1871 and 2013MH1959 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant's brief is deemed filed as of October 10, 2013.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Just ice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 11th day of October, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Cler k of Court
EXHIBIT 21.1



Subsidiaries





|                                       |  | State of      |  |                 |  | Abbreviated
|-------------------------------------- |  | ------------- |  | --------------- |  | -----------
|Name of Entity(2)                      |  | Incorporation |  | Relationship(1) |  | Reference  
|Epazz, Inc.                            |  | Illinois      |  | Parent          |  | Epazz      
|IntelliSys, Inc.                       |  | Wisconsin     |  | Subsidiary      |  | IntelliSys 
|Professional Resource Management, Inc. |  | Illinois      |  | Subsidiary      |  | PRMI       
|Desk Flex, Inc.                        |  | Illinois      |  | Subsidiary      |  | DFI        
|K9 Bytes, Inc.                         |  | Illinois      |  | Subsidiary      |  | K9 Bytes   
|MS Health, Inc.                        |  | Illinois      |  | Subsidiary      |  | MS Health  
|Cooling Technology Solutions, Inc.     |  | Illinois      |  | Subsidiary      |  | CTS        

(1)All subsidiaries are wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Epazz, Inc.

(2)All entities are in
the form of Corporations.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIALREPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 to which this certificationis being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), and the Exchange Act.  Inaccordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date:  May 11, 2009** | ** **                      |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                         | /s/ John  Fitzpatrick           |
|                         | Name: John  Fitzpatrick         |
|                         | Title: Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### James R. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-431.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 23, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Joel E. Grigsby, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

SANDERLIN, Judge.

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences for first degree murder and attempted first degree murder.

After reviewing the record and applicable case law, we find that the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s requested special jury instruction on the definition of “sudden passion.” *See, e.g., Perkins v. State,*463 So.2d 481 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We further find that there are sufficient facts in the record to support the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for directed verdict. *See, e.g., Prather v. State,*182 So.2d 273 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions.

We do, however, find error in appellant’s sentence for attempted first degree murder. The trial court incorrectly included 136 points on the guidelines score-sheet for appellant’s first degree murder conviction, a capital felony, as an additional offense at conviction. *See Leopard v. State,*491 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); *Coleman v. State,*483 So.2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). For the same reason, the trial court incorrectly included 21 points for victim injury involved in the first degree murder conviction. Because victim injury is not an element of attempted first degree murder, *see*§§ 782.04(1) and 777.04. Fla. Stat. (1985), the trial court additionally erred in including 21 points for victim injury in that offense. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)7; *Toney v. State,*456 So.2d 559 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Although we find that none of the *140above items may be scored in reaching appellant’s presumptive sentence, we note that at least one of the items has been held to be a valid reason for departure. *See, e.g., Leopard,*491 So.2d at 1286 (unscored first degree murder properly considered in determining whether to depart from guidelines).

Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s convictions for both crimes and his sentence for first degree murder, but reverse his sentence for attempted first degree murder and remand for resentencing within the guidelines unless the trial court finds that departure is appropriate.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and FRANK, J., concur.
#### Joan T.M. Verges Wife of Wade T. VERGES v. Wade T. VERGES.

No. 89-CC-0937.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 24, 1989.

In re Verges, Wade T.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-0465; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “F”, No. 88-6424.

Denied.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                    SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

           CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, FORMER INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-73211), of our report dated March 10, 1997 with respect to
the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows
of Sunrise Technologies International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
June 16, 1999
#### In re ESTATE OF Ary A. SMITH, Deceased.

No. 87-0520.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 2, 1988.

Kathryn C. Bass and Stephen R. Koons, of McGee, Jordan, Shuey, Koons, Schroeder & Morris, P.A., Lake Worth for appellant, Katie Daniel.

Malcolm Anderson of Law Offices of Malcolm Anderson, West Palm Beach, for appellee, Personal Representatives.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order, denying with prejudice a petition for revocation of probate. While there was adequate proof of the execution of the codicil in question, the petitioner was erroneously denied the opportunity to have an eviden-tiary hearing upon the issues of undue influence or lack of testamentary capacity. Accordingly, while we approve the conclusion of the trial court in its denial, we reverse the denial and remand with direction to proceed in accordance herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., GLICKSTEIN, J., and TOBIN, DAVID L., Associate Judge, concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, I, Arthur F. Ryan, Chief Executive  Officer
of The Prudential  Insurance Company of America (the "Company"),  hereby certify
that the Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,
2004,  containing the financial  statements of The Prudential  Variable Contract
Real Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance Company of
America) and The Prudential  Variable  Contract Real Property  Partnership  (the
"Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information  contained in the
Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The Prudential  Variable Contract Real Property Account
and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.


                                                   Date: March 31, 2005


                                               /s/ Arthur F. Ryan
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                  Name: Arthur F. Ryan
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**INDEX
      OIL AND GAS, INC.**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Boetius, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement req  uired
      by
      Sect ion
      906
      has bee  n
      provided to Index Oil and Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Index Oil and Gas,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.











/s/
      Andrew Boetius


Andrew
        Boetius


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      14, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1: Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1850 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of  South  Texas  Oil  Company  (the
"Company") on Form  10-QSB  for  the  period  ending  March 31, 2005 as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive Officer  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant   to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and that to  the best of  the
undersigned's knowledge and belief:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations  of  the
Company.

                         /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                         -------------------------------------------
                         MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 15, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18**

**of the United States Code**

I, Morton A. Plawner, Chief Financial Officer of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC.

|   |   |   |                                                              |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ Morton A. Plawner                                             |
|   |   |   |                                                                   |
|   |   |   | **Morton A. Plawner**Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 13, 2008 |

 

----