alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-63020,
333-113834, and 333-38765), Form S-4 (Nos. 333-11742, 333-38759, and
333-70522) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-112107, 333-71063, and 333-44742) of
Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February  23,
2007 relating to the financial statements, financial statement
schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form
10-K.

/s/ Pricewaterhouse
CoopersJacksonville, FloridaFebruary  26,
2007

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS III, L.P. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         528,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,750
<PP&E>                                       3,063,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,597,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,094
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,540,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,597,804
<SALES>                                      1,260,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,343,860
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,202
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,113,511
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,113,511
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,113,511
<EPS-BASIC>                                      89.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    89.80


</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Walter HOBDY.

No. 86-K-2170.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Hobdy, Walter; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18037-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 129603.

Prior report: La.App., 494 So.2d 1321. Denied.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                              --------------------




                                                 STATE OF
                                                 --------
COMPANY                                         INCORPORATION   D/B/A
-------                                         -------------   -----
 
G-I Holdings Inc.                                Delaware
   G Industries Corp.                            Delaware
    GAF Building Materials Corporation           Delaware
      Building Materials                         Delaware    GAF Materials
      Corporation of America                                 Corporation & Old
                                                             American Products
        U.S. Intec Holdings Inc.                 Delaware
          U.S. Intec, Inc.                       Texas       Tri-Ply Corporation
            Exterior Technologies Corporation    Texas
            Intec Marine Inc.                    Texas
            USI Materials Inc.                   Delaware
        GAF Leatherback Corp.                    Delaware
        BMCA Insulation Products Inc.            Delaware
        BMC Warehousing Inc.                     Delaware
        GAFTECH Corporation                      Delaware
        South Ponca Realty Corp.                 Delaware
        GAF Real Properties Inc.                 Delaware
        BMCA Receivables Corp.                   Delaware
        Pequannock Valley Claim Service          Delaware
          Company, Inc.                              
        GAF Premium Products Inc.                Delaware
          Wind Gap Real Property Acquisition     Delaware
            Corp.            
    GAF Fiberglass Corporation                   Delaware
      Merick Inc.                                Delaware
          GAF Broadcasting Company, Inc.         Delaware
          GAF Properties Inc.                    Delaware
          Q 104.3 Listeners Club Inc.            Delaware
       ACI Inc.                                  Georgia
       General Aniline & Film Corporation        Delaware
       BWater Corp.                              Delaware
       GAF Roofing Manufacturing Corp.           Delaware
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, George Moore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Barrington Sciences
Corporation, a Nevada corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 1, 2007


/S/ George Moore
-------------------------------
George Moore, President & CEO
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 110

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible

incorporation of the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and

Lithuania into the former Soviet Union;

Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the disintegration of the former

Soviet Union;

Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy,

passed legislation on human and minority rights that

conform to European and international norms, ensured

the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and

consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and the North Atlantic

Treaty Organization; and

Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political

and economic reforms, has made, and continues to make,

a significant contribution toward the maintenance of

international peace and stability by, among other actions,

its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in

Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress hereby—
2

SCON 110 ES

1 (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the

2 tenth anniversary of the reestablishment of its inde3 pendence and the role it played in the disintegration

4 of the former Soviet Union; and

5 (2) commends Latvia for its success in imple6 menting political and economic reforms, which may

7 further speed the process of that country’s integra8 tion into European and Western institutions.

Passed the Senate May 24, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 110

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth

anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former SovietUnion.
#### Rosa SMITH and Columbus Smith, Appellants, v. WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-2583.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 26, 1988.

Proenza, White & Huck and William J. Howell, Jr. and H. Mark Vieth, Miami, for appellants.

Richard N. Blank, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment for the defendant, Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., because there is no evidence as to the length of time the “green leafy substance” upon which the plaintiff allegedly slipped was on the floor, and, as this court has observed, “the fact that there is no inspection for a given length of time in itself provides no proof that the defect was actually there for a sufficient period to place the landowner on reasonable notice of its existence.” *McCanick v. W.J.A. Realty Limited Partnership,*516 So.2d 1129, 1130 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.
# AIRCRAFT

PHANTOM 3



# LIVE HD VIEW (TABLET OR SMARTPHONE) COMPLETE CONTROL The Phantom 3 can be set to fly only within a given distance and altitude from you, protecting your Phantom and making it automatically stay inside your desired limits. This invisible, GPS - enabled “geofence” prevents you from accidentally flying into unwanted areas or obstacles, and helps you enjoy flying while learning at the same time. 

# VISION POSITIONING Fly indoors, low to the ground, and in GPS - free areas with Vision Positioning technology. Visual and ultrasonic sensors scan the ground beneath your Phantom 3 for patterns, enabling it to identify its position and move accurately. 

# EASY TO FLY

Your Phantom 3 fits into your life and makes flying remarkably intuitive and ea sy. From takeoff to landing, it's completely under your control, responding to your commands while automatically handling the most complex aspects of safe, stable flight.

# WORRY - FREE AUTOPILOT

Automatic elements of your Phantom 3’s intelligent flight system help you fly and are available at the touch of a button. 

## AUTO - TAKEOFF With one tap in the DJI Pilot app, your Phantom 3 will turn on its motors and rise to a pre - set height. It will then hover perfectly in place until you direct it where to go. 

## AUTO - RETURN HOME When GPS is available, your Phantom 3 remembers the exact spot that it took off from. Wherever your aircraft is flying, tap a button to have it return right back home. 

## FAILSAFE If the Intelligent Flight Battery is running low, or if your Phantom 3 loses the connection with your remote controller for any reason, the aircraft will automatically return to the takeoff point and land safely. 

# UNMATCHED PROPULSION Each motor has the power and precision needed to give you the best flight experience po ssible. Brushless motors work with lightning - fast ESCs to make your Phantom 3 fast, agile, and responsive. These powerful motors give you the ability to speed up, quickly increase or decrease altitude, and stop immediately. DJI ’s powerful air braking mechanisms stop your Phantom 3 make it hover in place as soon as you release the control sticks. Aerodynamic self -tightening propellers boost thrust and stay firmly in place no matter how you fly. 

# SPECIFICATIONS: **Weight (Including Battery And Propellers)** 1280 g **Diagonal Size (Including Propellers)** 590 mm **Max Ascent Speed** 5 m/s **Max Descent Speed** 3 m/s**Hover Accuracy**

 Vertical: +/- 0.1 m

(when Vision Positioning is active) or +/ - 0.5 m  Horizontal: +/ - 1.5 m **Max Speed** 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) **Max Altitude A bove Sea Level**  6000 m **Operating Temperature** 0°C to 40°C **GPS Mode** GPS/GLONASS 

# REMOTE CONTROLLER **Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz**  **- 2.483**  **GHz Max Distance**  **2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)**  **Video Output Port USB**  **Operating Temperature 0°C**  **- 40°C**  **Battery 6000**  **mA h LiPo 2S**  **Mobile Device Holder** For tablet or phone **Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)**

- 101 dBm ±2 dBm **Transmitter Power (EIRP)**  FCC: 20 dBm  CE: 16 dBm **Working Voltage** 1.2 A @7.4 V
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 110 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States had never recognized the forcible incorporation of the 
        Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania into the former Soviet 
        Union;
Whereas the declaration on May 4, 1990, of the reestablishment of full 
        sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Latvia furthered the 
        disintegration of the former Soviet Union;
Whereas Latvia since then has successfully built democracy, passed legislation 
        on human and minority rights that conform to European and international 
        norms, ensured the rule of law, developed a free market economy, and 
        consistently pursued a course of integration into the community of free 
        and democratic nations by seeking membership in the European Union and 
        the North Atlantic Treaty Organization; and
Whereas Latvia, as a result of the progress of its political and economic 
        reforms, has made, and continues to make, a significant contribution 
        toward the maintenance of international peace and stability by, among 
        other actions, its participation in NATO-led peacekeeping operations in 
        Bosnia and Kosovo: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress hereby--
            (1) congratulates Latvia on the occasion of the tenth 
        anniversary of the reestablishment of its independence and the 
        role it played in the disintegration of the former Soviet 
        Union; and
            (2) commends Latvia for its success in implementing 
        political and economic reforms, which may further speed the 
        process of that country's integration into European and Western 
        institutions.

            Passed the Senate May 24, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 110

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Congratulating the Republic of Latvia on the tenth anniversary of the 
reestablishment of its independence from the rule of the former Soviet 
                                 Union.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00383

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M .A.L.R. , a Child

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- PA

- 01819

The Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. We order that no costs be assessed against appellant because he is indigent.

SIGNE D October 24 , 2018.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                          51,437
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   39,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    11,333
<INVENTORY>                                                     24,790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               176,655
<PP&E>                                                          42,717
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  29,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 221,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          244,890
<BONDS>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                       348,930
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0   
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (372,403)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   221,417
<SALES>                                                        466,136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               473,246
<CGS>                                                          284,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  461,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              31,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (19,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (19,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (19,641)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
#### Kenneth L. TOBIN, Appellant, v. ALFIERI MASERATI, S.P.A., a foreign corporation and Maserati Automobiles, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellees.

No. 86-2084.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Sept. 8, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 2, 1987.

Hall, O’Brien & Robinson and Richard O’Brien, III, Miami, for appellant.

Yelen & Yelen and Jan Yelen, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before HUBBART and FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff Kenneth L. Tobin appeals an adverse final judgment based on a jury verdict entered in an action based on the Florida Motor Vehicle Warranty Enforcement Act [“Lemon Law”]. Ch. 681, Fla.Stat. (1985). He raises three points on appeal, as well as a subsidiary evidentiary point. None of these points present reversible error, and, accordingly, we affirm.

First, we reject the plaintiff’s point in which he contends that he was entitled to a directed verdict at trial, or at least new trial, because (a) the jury verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence, (b) the plaintiff’s evidence showing violations of the “Lemon Law” [§§ 681.-101-681.111, Fla.Stat. (1985)] was uncon-troverted, and (c) the trial court erred in excluding certain statements of the defendants’ agents. A careful review of the trial transcript and briefs of the parties discloses that the jury verdict is supported by substantial competent evidence; *see Groth Air Serv., Inc. v. Florida Freight Terminal, Inc.,*489 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *Thompson v. Jacobs,*314 So.2d 797, 799-800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975); *Bryans v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,*191 So.2d 624, 625 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), the plaintiff’s evidence of alleged “Lemon Law” violations by the defendants was contradicted by defense testimony and exhibits; *see Martin v. Stone,*51 So.2d 33, 35 (Fla.1951); *Altman Cooling Corp. v. Florida Heat & Power, Inc.,*305 So.2d 225, 226 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), *cert. denied,*330 So.2d 725 (Fla.1975); *Nunberg**700*v. Brodsky,*224 So.2d 727, 729 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); and the claimed evidentiary error was not properly preserved for appellate review by a proffer of the excluded testimony, and the error, if any, was entirely harmless. *See Lawson v. Loftin,*155 Fla. 685, 688, 21 So.2d 202, 204 (1945); *Crawford v. Shivashankar,*474 So.2d 873, 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *Musachia v. Terry,*140 So.2d 605, 607-08 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962).

Second, we reject the plaintiffs point in which he asserts that he was entitled to a new trial because of defense counsel’s final argument to the jury. No objection was raised at trial to this argument and no showing of fundamental error has been made. *White Constr. Co. v. Dupont,*455 So.2d 1026, 1030 (Fla.1984); *Kinya v. Lifter, Inc.,*489 So.2d 92, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA), *rev. denied,*496 So.2d 142 (Fla.1986); *Nelson v. Reliance Ins. Co.,*368 So.2d 361, 361-62 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

Third, we reject the plaintiffs cumulative error point based on the above two points. No reversible error of any nature has been shown in this case. The final judgment under review is, therefore, in all respects

Affirmed.