alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 125 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.125
                                         Agreed to June 30, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, June 29, 2000, Friday, June 30, 2000, or on Saturday, July 1, 
2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until 
noon on Monday, July 10, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be 
specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to 
recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on 
the legislative day of Thursday, June 29, 2000, or Friday, June 30, 
2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its 
Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on 
Monday, July 10, 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                    |   |   |                          |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Date: November 14, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/Jonathan Snyder            |
|                    |   |   |                               |
|                    |   |   | Jonathan Snyder               |
|                    |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                    |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

----
#### James LUCAS v. The MILITARY DEPARTMENT, State of Louisiana.

No. 86-C-2424.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Lucas, James; applying for reconsideration of writ denial of January 23, 1987, 500 So.2d 421; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA 85 0923; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”, No. 267522.

Reconsideration denied. Judgment is definitive. La.C.C.P. art. 2166.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000846014
<NAME> SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS III, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         504,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,376,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,895,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,852,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,895,246
<SALES>                                         91,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               114,666
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,755
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5,089)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,089)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.41)
        




                                      

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

*Notice is hereby given*                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as Receiver for The Tattnall Bank, (“the Receiver”) intends to terminate its receivership for said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of The Tattnall Bank on December 04, 2009. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors.                

Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 34.2, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.

No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be considered which are not sent within this time frame.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Dated: March 15, 2012.

Robert E. Feldman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-6729 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*CLARENCE GLENN

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 706 (AC 16519), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution, in order for a defendant to secure a hearing regarding the veracity of an affidavit supporting a warrant, the defendant must make a showing of either intentional dishonesty or reckless disregard for the truth by an affiant, and that a showing that the informant gave materially false information is insufficient?”

*935The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15928.

*Theresa M. Dalton,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Ronald G. Weller,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | November 15, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Snyder           |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   |   | Jonathan Snyder               |   |
|   |              |   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |              |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

 

----
#### EGYPTIAN SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellant, v. A. E. BOYD, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy, et al. Appellee.

No. 8382.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 15, 1940.

Albert Karnes and Waller & Threlkeld, all of Paducah, Ky., for appellant.

A. E. Boyd, Jr., Adrian H. Terrell, E. Palmer James, Boyd & Boyd, McMurry, Katterjohn & Reed, and Wheeler & Shelbourne, all of Paducah, Ky., for appellees.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing upon the argument in said cause that the appellant’s claim of lien filed with the referee in bankruptcy, was denied as a secured, claim; that the appellant sought a review of the referee’s order in the District Court praying that the order be set aside; that upon consideration thereof an order was entered by the District Judge overruling and setting aside the referee’s order in accordance with a memorandum opinion of the court, and that it is from this order that the appeal is taken, and that no petition for any declaratory judgment is involved in the cause; and it being the view of the court that the appellant was granted below all the relief prayed for; that the order was not adverse to it but was in conformity with its petition for review, and that in consequence thereof no appeal can, by the appellant, be pursued from such order, now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed without prejudice to the right of the appellant perfecting an appeal from any final order or decree adverse to it if and when such order miay be entered in the cause, and such appeal is timely.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2341

           To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTANONE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.34.41       Cyclopentanone      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 120-92-                                                   31/2011.......
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2914.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### GILSTRAP et al. v. STANDARD OIL CO. et al. (two cases).

Nos. 9158, 9200.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 6, 1940.

Rehearing Denied March 13, 1940.

N. Lindsay South, of Fresno, Cal., and R. C. W. Friday, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants in No. 9158.

R. C. W. Friday, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant in No. 9200.

Walter Bowers, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Donald A. Pearce.

Andrews & Kline, and Mortimer Kline, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee W. N. Brower, J. A. Brower and E. F. Keller.

Grove J. Fink, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Hearst Publications, Inc.

Robinson, Price & Macdonald, of Oakland, Cal., for appellee Tribune Pub. Co.

Percy E. Towne, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee Chronicle Pub. Co.

Frank M. Carr, of Oakland, Cal., in pro. per.

James H. Oakley, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Warren, Brandon, Driver, Berry, Perkins, Radbruch, Van Patten and Garbini.

F. Bert Fernhoff and John W. Collier, both of Oakland, Cal., for appellee Robt. P. Tracy.

Felix T. Smith, Norbert Korte, and Francis R. Kirkham, all of San Francisco, Cal. (Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee Standard Oil C.o.

Max Felix, Marcus Mattson, and Lawler, Felix & Hall, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Standard Oil Co. of Cal.

Laurence W. Beilenson, William Berger, and Vallee, Beilenson & Kenny, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee W. H. Donahue.

Katie A. Conniff, in pro. per.

Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

In these cases the trial court sustained motions to dismiss upon the ground that no substantial federal question was presented by the respective complaints. The action of the trial court was correct. Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co., 9 Cir., 85 F.2d 742; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, 286 U.S. 210, 234, 52 S.Ct. 559, 76 L.Ed. 1062, 86 A.L.R. 403; Levering & Garrigues Co. v. Morrin, 289 U.S. 103, 53 S. Ct. 549, 77 L.Ed. 1062.

The respective judgments are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cdoor Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lavi Krasney of the
Company, CEO certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
13650, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Lavi Krasney
                                        --------------------
                                        Lavi Krasney
                                        CEO
                                        May 10, 2006

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1945

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee,

No. 97-2256

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendant - Appellee.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-3472-S)

Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing

Appellant's complaint alleging employment discrimination claims and

denying Appellant's motion to vacate the district court's order

dismissing his complaint. Appellant also appeals the district

court's order denying his motion for recusal and granting his

motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the records

and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Wilder v. Shalala, No. CA-96-3742-S (D. Md. July 14, 1997; July 28,

1997; July 30, 1997; Aug. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EX-4.7





 Exhibit 4.7 

FORM 51-102F3 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT 
  

	Item 1.	 Name and Address of Company 



Docebo Inc. (the “Company”) 

366 Adelaide Street West 

Toronto, Ontario 
 M5V 1R7 

 

	Item 2.	 Date of Material Change 



August 11, 2020 
  

	Item 3.	 News Release 



Attached as Schedule “A” is a copy of the press release relating to the material change, which was disseminated on August 11,
2020 through the newswire services of Cision and filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval. 
  

	Item 4.	 Summary of Material Change 



On August 11, 2020, the Company announced that it and certain of its shareholders, namely Claudio Erba, Gresilent Holding Srl, Intercap
Equity Inc., Intercap Financial Inc. (together with Intercap Equity Inc., “Intercap”) and Alessio Artuffo (collectively, the “Selling Shareholders”), had entered into an agreement with a syndicate of underwriters
(the “Underwriters”) led by Canaccord Genuity Corp., TD Securities Inc., Morgan Stanley Canada Limited and Goldman Sachs Canada Inc. to complete a new issue and secondary offering of an aggregate of 1,500,000 common shares of the
Company (“Common Shares”) at a price of C$50.00 per Common Share, on a bought deal basis, for gross proceeds of C$25 million and C$50 million to the Company and the Selling Shareholders, respectively, for aggregate gross
proceeds of C$75 million (the “Offering”). 
 Intercap also granted the Underwriters an over-allotment option to
purchase up to an additional 225,000 Common Shares from Intercap for a period of 30 days after the closing of the Offering. 
 The net
proceeds of the Offering will be used to strengthen the Company’s financial position and allow it to pursue its growth strategies, which include: expanding its customer base; supporting the growth of existing customers; expanding its solutions;
and selectively pursuing acquisitions. 
 On August 17, 2020 the Company filed a preliminary short form prospectus in connection with
the Offering. 













	Item 5.	 Full Description of Material Change 



For a full description of the material change, please see Schedule “A” attached hereto. 

 

	Item 6.	 Reliance on Subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102



 Not applicable. 
  

	Item 7.	 Omitted Information 



Not applicable. 
  

	Item 8.	 Executive Officer 



The name and business telephone number of the officer of the Company who can answer questions regarding this material change report is as
follows: 
 Ian Kidson, Chief Financial Officer 

Tel: (416) 456-5868 
  

	Item 9.	 Date of Report 



August 21, 2020 

  
 2 













 SCHEDULE “A” 

(see attached) 

  
 3
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cavalier Group
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.

Dated: January 10, 2007

/s/ Gerald W. Williams

Gerald W. WilliamsChief Executive Officer

---