alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. Con. Res. 138 Agreed to December 15, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas human progress in the 21st century will depend upon

global understanding and cooperation in finding positive solutions

to hunger and violence;

Whereas the turn of the millennium offers unparalleled opportunity

for humanity to examine its past, set goals for the future, and

establish new patterns of behavior;

Whereas the people of the United States and the world observed

the day designated by the United Nations General Assembly

as ‘‘One Day in Peace, January 1, 2000’’ (General Assembly

Resolution 54/29);

Whereas the example set on that day ought to be recognized globally

and repeated each year;

Whereas the people of the United States seek to establish better

relations with one another and with the people of all countries;

and

Whereas celebration by the breaking of bread together traditionally

has been the means by which individuals, societies, and nations

join together in peace: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

(1) each year should begin with a day of peace and sharing

during which—

(A) people around the world should gather with family,

friends, neighbors, their faith community, or people of

another culture to pledge nonviolence in the new year

and to share in a celebratory new year meal; and

(B) Americans who are able should match or multiply

the cost of their new year meal with a timely gift to

the hungry at home or abroad in a tangible demonstration

of a desire for increased friendship and sharing among

people around the world; and
S. Con. Res. 138—2

(2) the President should issue a proclamation each year

calling on the people of the United States and interested

organizations to observe such a day with appropriate programs

and activities.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
EXHIBIT 23-1
                                                                    ------------




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc.
Brentwood, New York

      We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Allou Health & Beauty Care,
Inc.'s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2001 of our
report dated June 19, 2000 related to the consolidated financial statements and
schedules of Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. and subsidiaries.



/S/ MAYER RISPLER & COMPANY, P.C.

MAYER RISPLER & COMPANY, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants


June 28, 2001
Brooklyn, New York
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 103

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the United States Armed Forces conducted military

operations in Southeast Asia during the period (known as

the ‘‘Vietnam era’’) from February 28, 1961, to May 7,

1975;

Whereas during the Vietnam era more than 3,403,000 American military personnel served in the Republic of Vietnam

and elsewhere in Southeast Asia in support of United

States military operations in Vietnam, while millions

more provided for the Nation’s defense in other parts of

the world;

Whereas during the Vietnam era untold numbers of civilian

personnel of the United States Government also served in

support of United States operations in Southeast Asia

and elsewhere in the world;

Whereas May 7, 2000, marks the 25th anniversary of the

closing of the period known as the Vietnam era; and

Whereas that date would be an appropriate occasion to recognize and express appreciation for the individuals who

served the Nation in Southeast Asia and elsewhere in the

world during the Vietnam era: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That Congress—
2

SCON 103 ES

1 (1) honors the service and sacrifice of the mem2 bers of the Armed Forces and Federal civilian em3 ployees who during the Vietnam era served the Na4 tion in the Republic of Vietnam and elsewhere in

5 Southeast Asia or otherwise served in support of

6 United States operations in Vietnam and in support

7 of United States national security interests through8 out the world;

9 (2) recognizes and honors the sacrifice of the

10 families of those individuals referred to in paragraph

11 (1) who lost their lives or remain unaccounted for or

12 were injured during that era, in Southeast Asia or

13 elsewhere in the world, in defense of United States

14 national security interests; and

15 (3) encourages the American people, through

16 appropriate ceremonies and activities, to recognize

17 the service and sacrifice of those individuals.

Passed the Senate May 4, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 103

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Honoring the members of the Armed Forces and

Federal civilian employees who served the Nationduring the Vietnam era and the families of thoseindividuals who lost their lives or remain unaccounted for or were injured during that era inSoutheast Asia or elsewhere in the world in defense of United States national security interests.
50477, 50478.

#### LANCE ROOFING COMPANY et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF GWINNETT COUNTY et al.; and vice versa.

Argued April 7, 1975

Decided April 28, 1975

Rehearing denied May 13, 1975

Webb, Judge.

The Board of Education of Gwinnett County is not a body corporate capable of being sued in the ordinary sense, as in this case, and the learned trial judge erred in denying the board’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative its motion for summary judgment. *Mattox v. Bd. of Education of Liberty County,*148 Ga. 577, 580 (2) (97 SE 532, 5 ALR 568); *Smith v. Bd. of Education of Washington County,*153 Ga. 758, 759 (2) (113 SE 147); *Bd. of Education of Candler County v. Southern Michigan Nat. Bank,*184 Ga. 641 (1) (192 SE *382); Bd. of Education of Baker County v. Hall,*189 Ga. 615, 617 (2) (7 SE2d 183); *Verner v. Bd. of Education of Haralson County,*203 Ga. 521 (2) (47 SE2d 500); *Parker v. Bd. of Education of Sumter County,*209 Ga. 5 (2) (70 SE2d 369); *Smith v. Maynard,*214 Ga. 764, 769 (107 SE2d 815); *Ayers v. Bd. of Education of Hart County,*56 Ga. App. 146 (1) (192 SE 256); *Ray v. Cobb County Bd. of Education,*110 Ga. App. 258 (2) (138 SE2d 392); *Foster v. Cobb County Board of Education,*133 Ga. App. 768 (213 SE2d 38) and cits.

The foregoing being dispositive, it is unnecessary to consider the other enumerations of error.

*Judgment is affirmed as to No. 50477 and reversed as to No. 50478.*

*Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.*

*801*Stokes, Boyd & Shapiro, Thomas J. Wingfield,*for appellants.

*Webb, Fowler & Tanner, Jones Webb, J. L.Ed-. mondson, Robert E. Hicks,*for appellees.
#### Nita M. DIETRICH v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. Nita M. DIETRICH v. Marilyn CLARK and Allstate Insurance Co.

No. 89-C-0729.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Cabana Pool Corp.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA87 1271, CA88 0157; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 282-409.

Prior report: La.App,, 540 So.2d 358.

Denied.
<PAGE>



[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO]

PricewaterCoopers LLP
Barnett Center
50 North Laura Street
Suite 3000 Jacksonville FL 33202
Telephone (904) 354-0671
Facsimile (904)366-3678
Direct phone (904) 366-3604
Direct fax (904)366-3678


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-38765), the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(No. 333-38759) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71063) of
Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March 27, 2000 relating to the
consolidated financial statements of Armor Holdings, Inc. which is incorporated
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                             PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Jacksonville, Florida
March 30, 2000
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6915

SEQUOIA MCKINNON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
WARDEN KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 8:22

- cv - 01205

- RMG )

Submitted : May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Sequoia McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6915 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Sequoia McKinnon seeks to appeal the district court’s order s (1) accepting , in part, the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely McKinnon ’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition ; and (2) denying McKinnon’s motion for reconsideration

. See
Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petition s are subject to one

- year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates
enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S. C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When , as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must de monstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez , 565 U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independe ntly reviewed the record and conclude that McKinnon has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny all pending motions, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6915 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2313 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-Dichloro-3,6-Bis(9-Ethyl-3- 

Carbazolylamino)-1,4-Benzoquinone(Dianil). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,5-Dichloro-3,6-Bis(9- 

Ethyl-3-Carbazolylamino)-1,4-Benzoquinone(Dianil). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,5-DICHLORO-3,6-BIS(9-ETHYL-3- 

4 CARBAZOLYLAMINO)-1,4- 

5 BENZOQUINONE(DIANIL). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2313 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,5-Cyclohexadiene-1,4-dione2,5-dichloro-3,6-bis[(9-ethyl9H-carbazol-3-yl)amino] 

(CAS No. 80546–37–8) (provided for in subheading 

2929.90.5090) ....................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,715
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,214)
<INVENTORY>                                     16,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,571
<PP&E>                                          43,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                (32,333)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,237
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,363
<OTHER-SE>                                    (78,669)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,762
<SALES>                                        123,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               123,442
<CGS>                                           60,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,365)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,925)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)
        

</TABLE>
50469.

#### KING v. THE STATE.

Webb, Judge.

Johnny King was charged in three separate accusations with the offense of theft by receiving stolen property (Criminal Code Ann. § 26-1806). The property involved was blank motor vehicle inspection stickers, accusation no. 4347 describing by serial number 21 stickers stolen from Bob Bockius, accusation no. 4348 similarly describing 5 stickers stolen from M. K. Chancey, and accusation no. 4349 describing 3 stickers stolen from Walker-McDonald. King was found guilty on each accusation and sentenced to 12 months on each, and he now appeals. *Held:*

1. The only substantial issue raised by this appeal relates to the general grounds of the motion for new trial and to what King denominates a "chain of custody” objection. Succinctly stated, the problem is that although there was ample evidence that all the numbered stickers had been stolen as alleged, that King had been peddling blank stickers in a "black market” operation, and that the stickers identified in the accusations had been recovered from various vehicles throughout the county, there is a failure in the evidence to connect King with the great bulk of the stickers by means of their serial numbers as alleged in the accusation.

However, accusation no. 4347 listed sticker no. 896514; there was ample evidence that this sticker had been stolen from the safe of Bob Bockius by means of a cutting torch; that King sold blank stickers to Bill Evans; and that sticker no. 896514 was recovered from Evans as one illegally bought by him from King. Thus King is sufficiently connected to this particular sticker by serial number; and since the conviction and sentence of one year was authorized for theft by receiving of only this one sticker (Criminal Code Ann. § 26-1812; Code Ann. § 27-2506), the judgment on accusation no. 4347 will not be set aside. *Burkett v. State,*133 Ga. App. 728, 733 (3b) and cases cited.

There is, however, no similar connecting link with any of the numbered stickers as alleged in the other two accusations, and the judgments of conviction and *637sentence on those accusations are reversed.

Submitted April 7, 1975

Decided April 24, 1975.

*Boatright & Boatright, J. Laddie Boatright,*for appellant.

*Albert D. Mullís, District Attorney,*for appellee.

2. Remaining contentions and enumerations of error fail to demonstrate reversible error.

*Judgment on accusation no. 4347 affirmed; judgments on accusations nos. 4348 and 4349 reversed.*

*Bell C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.*
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2210 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2210

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                 resin comprising a certain copolymer.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on a certain ion exchange 
                 resin comprising a certain copolymer.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. A CERTAIN ION EXCHANGE RESIN COMPRISING A CERTAIN COPOLYMER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to a certain ion exchange resin 
comprising a certain copolymer) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|          Signature |         Title                                  |                Date  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Thomas SandgaardThomas      Sandgaard                  | Director,      Chairman of the Board, President and      Chief Executive Officer  | March      30, 2009                                                    |
|                                                            |                                                                                   |                                                                   |
| /s/ Fritz G. AllisonFritz      G. Allison                  | Chief      Financial Officer                                                           | March      30, 2009                                                    |
|                                                            |                                                                                   |                                                                   |
| /s/ Taylor SimontonTaylor      Simonton                    | Director                                                                          | March      30, 2009                                                    |
|                                                            |                                                                                   |                                                                   |
|  /s/ Mary Beth VitaleMary      Beth Vitale            |  Director                                                                         |  March      30,2009                                               |
# BANKGREENVILLE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION

# Exhibit 32 Section 1350
Certifications

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of BankGreenville Financial Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|                         |  |                              
|Date:  November 12, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Russel T. Williams
|                         |  | Russel T. Williams           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer      

|                         |  |                         
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|                         |  |                         
|Date:  November 12, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Paula S. King
|                         |  | Paula S. King           
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer