alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

:q 

From: adkjack@primelink1.net . 


Sent: :Sund~y, February 14, 20104:14 PM 


To: 'i Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Cc: Swanson, Brian (OST) 


Gentlemen,. .., 

On Saturday February 13. 2010 an "Opinion" letter written by Andrew Schonbek regarding the terrible decision by the 

Clinton County Fathers to award the carrier contract to Colgan Air appeared in the Press Republican. Mr. Schonbek 

Makes every possible argument why Cape Air should remain the carrier and why Colgan Air should not be awarded any 

contract. I agree with all of Mr. Schonbeck's arguments in their entirety. 

I would like to expound on one aspect, as a pilot, that the county fathers seem to be ignoring. The night of the Colgan Air 

. crash in Buffalo I turned to my wife and stated what I thought had happened. It turned out a year later that I was correct. 

. Now keep in mind that I have less than 100 hours in the air and do not have extensive flight time. 

The problem was a basic one of ice buildup,and air speed as it relates to stalling an aircraft. Colgan air had two pilots in 


the cockpit and even with automated warning devices, bells and shaker stick, neither were able to apply the proper 


procedure to save all on board the craft. 


Two improperly trained pilots are not any good in any situation thus eliminating the county fathers weak two pilot theory. 


Colgan Air was aware of both pilots qualifications but assigned them this flight in spite of many indications that should 


have prevented it. 


This is arrogance on the part of the company placing the bottom line over the responsibility for the lives on board. Why 

does Plattsburgh even want to think about having an airline in Plattsburgh with this kind of record? Why should we as 

. taxpayers accept this type of inferior airmanship and corporate thinking for our families. I realize this was a one time 

happening in Buffalo but how many time would you like it happening to you? Isn't one more than enough? 

Jack Mulholland 


1 Shamrock Court 


Plattsburgh, New York 12901 


518-566-7641 


1
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James O. PEARSON.

No. 86-KK-2369.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Pearson, James 0.; applying for supervisory and remedial writs; Parish of *86Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 86-1501A; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18762-KW.

Denied.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 22, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 22, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A1495. SERENITY BUILDERS AND DEVELOPEMENT, LLC et al. v. LINCOLN 

COUNTY, GEORGIA.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On June 11, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a 

brief no later than June 21, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of 

errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is 

hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNX Gas Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, President and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) of the Registrant, certify that to my knowledge, based upon a reviewof the Report:     (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.Date: November 2, 2006                                                                      /s/ Nicholas J. DeIuliis   **Nicholas J. DeIuliis**   **President, Chief Executive Officer andDirector**  
36
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Longitudinal Studies on the Impact of Adolescent Drinking on the Adolescent Brain.                    

*Date:*                         April 16-17, 2012                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 8 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate cooperative agreement applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, B1/B2 Conference Room, Bethesda, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Beata Buzas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 2081, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0800,                         *bbuzas@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 13, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-6706 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Anthony
              C. PintsopoulosAnthony
              C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
              Financial OfficerAugust
                8, 2006
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas on the eve of the Jewish holiday of Passover 1999,

13 Jews, including community and religious leaders in

the cities of Shiraz and Isfahan, were arrested by the authorities of the Islamic Republic of Iran and accused of

spying for the United States and Israel;

Whereas three of 13 defendants were tried in the first week

in May 2000, in trials that were closed to all independent

journalists, outside media, international observers, and

family members;

Whereas no evidence was brought forth at these trials other

than taped ‘‘confessions’’, and no formal charges have yet

been filed;

Whereas Jews in Iran are prohibited from holding any positions that would give them access to state secrets;

Whereas the judge in the case also serves as prosecutor, chief

investigator, and arbiter of punishment;

Whereas United States Secretary of State Albright has identified the case of the 13 Jews in Shiraz as ‘‘one of the

barometers of United States-Iran relations’’;

Whereas countless nations and leading international human

rights organizations have expressed their concern for the

13 Iranian Jews and especially their human rights under

the rule of law;
2

SCON 109 ES

Whereas President Mohammad Khatami was elected on a

platform of moderation and reform;

Whereas the United States has recently made goodwill overtures toward Iran, including lifting restrictions on the import of Iranian foodstuffs and crafts, promising steps toward the return of assets frozen since 1979, and easing

travel restrictions, all in an attempt to improve relations

between the two countries;

Whereas the World Bank is currently considering two Iranian

projects, valued at more than $130,000,000, which have

been on hold since 1993; and

Whereas Iran must show signs of respecting fundamental

human rights as a prerequisite for improving its relationship with the United States and becoming a member in

good standing of the world community: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the

3 President should—

4 (1) condemn, in the strongest possible terms,

5 the arrest of the 13 Iranian Jews and the unfair

6 procedures employed against them leading up to,

7 and during, their trials, and demand their immediate

8 release; and

9 (2) make it clear that—

10 (A) Iran’s treatment of the Jews on trial

11 is a benchmark for determining the nature of

12 current and future United States-Iran relations,
3

SCON 109 ES

1 and that concessions already made may be re2 scinded in light of Iran’s conduct of these cases;

3 and

4 (B) the outcome of these cases will help

5 determine Iran’s standing in the community of

6 nations, and its eligibility for loans and other fi7 nancial assistance from international financial

8 institutions.

Passed the Senate May 4, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 109

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress regarding the ongoing persecution of 13 members of Iran’s Jewish community.
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

Short Employment Letter Agreement 
 This
letter agreement (“Agreement”) memorializes a verbal agreement discussed as noted between the members of BioAtla LLC (“BioAtla”), a Delaware company, and Dr. Jay M. Short (“Dr. Short”), it’s Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer. 
  

	 	1.	 For his roll as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of BioAtla, beginning April 2nd, 2007, Dr. Jay M. Short, shall be paid a starting annual base salary of $250,000 (paid twice monthly); 



 

	 	2.	 Salary shall be paid through BioAtla payroll. 



 

	 	3.	 Dr. Short shall receive all company benefits available to employees including, but not limited to, health
and dental insurance, vision coverage, vacations, and bonuses. 


  

	 	4.	 Beginning in January 1st, 2008, Dr. Short, subject to
his approval on an annual basis, voluntarily limited his salary increase to the average raise given to the employees of the company. 



Carolyn Anderson 
 Managing Member 

BioAtla 












 Letter Amendment 

Short Employment 
 October
1st, 2011 
 This letter amendment (“Amendment”) memorializes an agreement by
Dr. Jay M. Short (“Dr. Short”), Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BioAtla LLC to modify his BioAtla annual salary (“Salary”). From October 1st, 2011 to
July 31st, 2013, Dr. Short’s Salary shall to one third of his existing salary. His salary shall resume August 1st, 2013 at the normal
rate (rate includes a 4% annual COLA). 
  

	
	/s/ Carolyn Anderson
	 Carolyn Anderson
 Managing Member

BioAtla
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 143 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 143

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3676) entitled ``An Act to 
establish the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in 
the State of California'', the Clerk of the House of Representatives 
shall make the following corrections:
            (1) In the second sentence of section 2(d)(1), strike ``and 
        the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry''.
            (2) In the second sentence of section 4(a)(3), strike 
        ``Nothing in this section'' and insert ``Nothing in this Act''.
            (3) In section 4(c)(1), strike ``any person, including''.
            (4) In section 5, add at the end the following:
    ``(j) Wilderness Protection.--Nothing in this Act alters the 
management of any areas designated as Wilderness which are within the 
boundaries of the National Monument. All such areas shall remain 
subject to the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the laws 
designating such areas as Wilderness, and other applicable laws. If any 
part of this Act conflicts with any provision of those laws with 
respect to the management of the Wilderness areas, such provisions 
shall control.''.

            Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 143

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill, H.R. 3676.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2455 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2455

   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on pigment 
preparations based on cerium sulfide or mixtures of cerium sulfide and 
                           lanthanum sulfide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on pigment 
preparations based on cerium sulfide or mixtures of cerium sulfide and 
                           lanthanum sulfide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PIGMENT PREPARATIONS BASED ON CERIUM SULFIDE OR MIXTURES OF 
              CERIUM SULFIDE AND LANTHANUM SULFIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.90 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to cerium sulfide pigments) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking the article description and inserting the 
        following: ``Pigment preparations based on cerium sulfide or 
        mixtures of cerium sulfide and lanthanum sulfide (provided for 
        in subheading 3206.49.60)''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7207

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARIO SALAS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief

District Judge. (CR-98-166)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 29, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Salas, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mario Salas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motions filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) &

60(b). To appeal these orders in a post-conviction proceeding,

Salas must establish his entitlement to a certificate of

appealability. Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir.

2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Salas has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Salas’ notice of appeal and

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). United States v. Winestock,

340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain

authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a movant must

assert a claim based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional
- 3 -

law or (2) newly discovered evidence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Salas’

claim does not satisfy either of these standards. Therefore, we

decline to authorize a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1929 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1929 ES

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AU2 THORIZATION OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSI4 NESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 

7 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

8 (Public Law 109–316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

9 amended by section 1 of Public Law 111–66, is amended 

10 by striking ‘‘October 31, 2009’’ each place it appears and 

11 inserting ‘‘April 30, 2010’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 30, 2009. 

Passed the Senate October 26, 2009. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1929 

AN ACT 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of 

other purposes. Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for programs under the Small Business Act and the
#### Peter CHATMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 16, 1988.

Peter Chatman, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Chatman appeals an order of the trial court which revoked his probation and directed a sentence of ten years incarceration. We affirm the order of revocation but remand for resentencing.

Chatman was originally charged with three counts of aggravated battery, to which he entered pleas of nolo contendere. He was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to three years in state prison on counts one and two to run concurrently and was placed on probation as to count three for a period of fifteen years, which was to run consecutive to the three-year terms on counts one and two.

Following the start of Chatman’s probation, an affidavit and warrant for violation of probation was filed against him for failure to submit written reports for two months in 1987 and for failure to pay $320 in arrearages as costs of supervision. At a hearing on the violation of probation, the trial court orally found Chatman had committed “willful and deliberate” violations of his conditions of probation and had demonstrated “nothing but contempt for the compassion this court [trial court] has shown.” Chatman was then sentenced to ten years in prison which exceeded the sentencing guidelines range of two and one-half to three and one-half years that included the enhancement to the next higher cell permit*916ted for the violation of probation. The sole written reason appearing on Chatman’s scoresheet for the departure was “VOP.”

This court has previously stated that reasons for departure from the sentencing guidelines which were all grounded upon defendant’s willful violation of probation cannot be the basis for departure beyond the one-cell enhancement for violation of probation provided under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(14). *Machansky v. State,*517 So.2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). The willfulness of the defendant is an element of every violation of probation. *Id.*at 102 (citing *Shaw v. State,*391 So.2d 754 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)). *See also Alexander v. State,*513 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); *Duval v. State,*500 So.2d 570 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (a clear and convincing reason other than the violation of probation must be provided in writing by the trial court to support a departure beyond the one-cell enhancement).

We reverse and remand this case to the trial court to impose a sentence that is within the two and one-half to three and one-half years guidelines range that encompasses the one-cell bump for the violation of probation.

Reversed and remanded.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and SCHEB, J., concur.