alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# MANDATORY

652 Oliver Street Williamsport, PA 17701 U.S.A. 

# SERVICE BULLETIN Tel. 570-323-6181
Fax. 570-327-7101 www.lycoming.com

May 27, 2009

Supplement No. 1

To

Service Bulletin No. 569A

Supplement No. 1 to Service Bulletin No. 569A is bei ng issued to correct an inconsistency between the engine models and spare cranksha fts in the “Models Affected” sect ion on Page 1 and the start date

referenced for these stated items.

not

The correct start date of aff ected engine models and spare crankshafts is January 1, 1997, March 1, 1997. This date change does not affect Tables 1-5 of affected engine and cranks haft serial numbers or Appendix 1 of affected crankshaft kit part numbers.

If you have previously determined th at your engine or crankshaft was not affected by verifying that the serial numbers were not published in Service Bulle tin No. 569A, then no further action is required.

If you previously determined that your engine and/or crankshaft was not affect ed only by using the start date of March 1, 1997, then your engine and/or crankshaft may be affected. Verify that your engine and/or crankshaft serial number is not pub lished in Service Bulletin No. 569A. If your engine and/or crankshaft serial number is not published in Service Bulletin No. 569A, then no further action is required. If your engine and/or crankshaft serial number is published in Service Bulletin No. 569A , follow the instructions for compliance.

ISSUED REVISED PAGE NO. REVISION

MO DAY YEAR MO DAY YEAR

05 27 09 -- -- -- 1 of 1 --

©2009 by Lycoming “All Rights Reserved” Lycoming Engines, a division of AVCO Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Textron Inc.
S. Con. Res. 94 Agreed to March 9, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, March 9, 2000, or Friday, March 10,

2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or

adjourned until noon on Monday, March 20, 2000, or until such

time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or

his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

first.

SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate, after consultation

with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members

of the Senate to reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public

interest shall warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Travel Group
(the "Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely
for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  October
      28, 2009
            /s/
      Jiangping JiangJiangping
      Jiang
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2** CERTIFICATION         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, Richard J.    Carbone, Chief Financial Officer of The Prudential Insurance    Company of America, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual    Report on    Form 10-K    for the year ended December 31, 2006, containing the    financial statements of The Prudential Variable Contract Real    Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance    Company of America) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real    Property Partnership (the “Report”), fully complies    with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15    (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property    Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property    Partnership.     Date: March 23, 2007 /s/  Richard    J. Carbone    Name: Richard J. Carbone     Title:     Chief Financial Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant    to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as    part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Nutek  Oil  Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  quarter  ended  March 31, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 17, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-10707

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES GREGORY MORRIS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-101-1

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After a bench trial, James Morris was convicted of two counts of receiving

child pornography and one count of possession of child pornography in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2) and (a)(5)(B). He was sentenced to 262 months of

imprisonment to be followed by a life term of supervised release. Morris appeals

the conviction, arguing that the Government failed to prove the jurisdictional

element of the crimes. He argues that under the language of § 2252A, as it

existed at the time when the offense was committed, the Government had to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 7, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-10707 Document: 00511626235 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/07/2011
No. 10-10707

prove that the images were transported in interstate commerce. Thus, Morris

reasons, because the Government only presented evidence that the child

pornography was downloaded from the Internet, the evidence was insufficient

to show that the material actually crossed state lines. 

Morris’s argument is contrary to our holding that “transmission of

photographs by means of the Internet is tantamount to moving photographs

across state lines and thus constitutes transportation in interstate commerce.” 

United States v. Runyan, 290 F.3d 223, 239 (5th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation

marks and citation omitted); see also United States v. Barlow, 568 F.3d 215, 221-

21 n.4 (5th Cir. 2009) (citing Runyan as an alternative basis for concluding that

proof that images traveled in interstate commerce was not required, albeit under

a different statute). His arguments that the evidence did not support his

conviction for possession is additionally without merit in light of United States

v. Dickson, 632 F.3d 186, 189 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 2947 (2011). 

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. 

2

Case: 10-10707 Document: 00511626235 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/07/2011
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1886

SAAD LODHI , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. OFFICER BRADSHAW; FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA; FAIRFAX COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff , District Judge. ( 1:23

- cv - 00122

- MSN

- LRV )

Submitted : January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024

Before KING , AGEE , and THACKER , Circuit Judges

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Saad Usman Lodhi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1886 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Saad Usman Lodhi appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). In his informal brief, Lodhi asserts that another judge granted him leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate case filed in the district court. Lodhi also complains that the court suddenly cancelled a hearing that was scheduled to address his second motion to proceed in forma pauper is . However, Lodhi does not challenge the court’s conclusion that, in this case, leave to proceed in forma pauperis was unwarranted in light of his stated annual income . Because Lodhi’s informal brief therefore fails to challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1886 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/S/ J. NICK RIEHLEJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 2, 2009
#### Linea R. EHLINGER, et al. v. LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT, et al.

No. 88-C-0025.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Ehlinger, Linea R.; Ehlinger, Ran-cier B. Individ.; applying for writ of certio-,rari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth; Circuit, No. 87-CA-0448; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 303106.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1136.

Denied. Result correct.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0224

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

AMIEL JON GARDIPE JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 21, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2022

10/13/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0224
#### STATE ex rel. Clifford SHAMBLIN v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2579.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Shamblin, Clifford; applying for post conviction relief; Parish of West Feli-ciana, 20th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 73-8-393.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2454

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or 
          coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures or 
          coprecipitates of yttrium oxide and europium oxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OR COPRECIPITATES OF YTTRIUM OXIDE AND EUROPIUM 
              OXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures or coprecipitates 
of yttrium oxide and europium oxide) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131545 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131545 COA: 261096 Alger CC: 04-001639-FH DAVID BRIAN JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 23, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James BULLOCK.

No. 87-KH-2402.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Bullock, James; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 319-328.

Denied.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7179]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

STATE JUSTICE INSTITUTE


SJI Board of Directors Meeting, Notice

AGENCY: State Justice Institute.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The SJI Board of Directors will be meeting on Monday, April 
23, 2012 at 1 p.m. The meeting will be held at the National Center for 
State Courts Headquarters in Williamsburg, Virginia. The purpose of 
this meeting is to consider grant applications for the 2nd quarter of 
FY 2012, and other business. All portions of this meeting are open to 
the public.

ADDRESSES: National Center for State Courts Headquarters, 300 Newport 
Avenue, Williamsburg, VA 23185, 800-616-6164.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonathan Mattiello, Executive 
Director, State Justice Institute, 11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1020, 
Reston, VA 22314, 571-313-8843, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0939f9e84919384b0839a99de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52313d3c263331261221383b7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jonathan D. Mattiello,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-7179 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 113

To amend the Stand Rules of the Senate to require that the Pledge of

Allegiance to the Flag of the United States be recited at the commencement of the daily session of the Senate.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9, 1999

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. HELMS, Mr. ROBB, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. CONRAD, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. THURMOND, Mr. WARNER, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. BROWNBACK,

and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) submitted the following resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

JUNE 23, 1999

Committee discharged; considered, amended, and agreed to

RESOLUTION

To amend the Stand Rules of the Senate to require that

the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States

be recited at the commencement of the daily session

of the Senate.

Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is our Nation’s most revered and preeminent symbol;

Whereas the Flag of the United States of America is recognized and respected throughout the world as a symbol of

democracy, freedom, and human rights;
2

SRES 113 ATS

Whereas, in the words of the Chief Justice of the United

States, the Flag of the United States of America ‘‘in

times of national crisis, inspires and motivates the average citizen to make personal sacrifices in order to achieve

societal goals of overriding importance... and serves as a

reminder of the paramount importance of pursuing the

ideals that characterize our society’’;

Whereas the House of Representatives of the United States

has opened each of its daily sessions with the Pledge of

Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America

since 1988; and

Whereas opening each of the daily sessions of the Senate of

the United States with the Pledge of Allegiance to the

Flag of the United States would demonstrate reverence

for the Flag and serve as a daily reminder to all Senators

of the ideals that it represents: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That paragraph 1(a) of rule IV of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by inserting after ‘‘prayer

by the Chaplain’’ the following: ‘‘and after the Presiding Officer, or a Senator designated by the Presiding Officer, leads

the Senate from the dais in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance

to the Flag of the United States’’.

Æ
Exhibit 23.1



LOGO



Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-31737 and No. 333-66305) on Form S-8 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries of our report dated January 6, 2005 (except for Note 16, which is dated February 14, 2005) with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, cash flows and comprehensive income, for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004 which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 of New Hampshire Thrift Bancshares, Inc.



/s/ Shatswell, MacLeod & Company, P.C.

SHATSWELL, MacLEOD & COMPANY, P.C.



West Peabody, Massachusetts

March 23, 2005



LOGO
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000846909        
<NAME>                        CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1.000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         214,828
<SECURITIES>                                   165,396
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,372
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,476
<INVENTORY>                                    197,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               898,424
<PP&E>                                         342,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,306,855  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,255                             
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,563
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,306,855
<SALES>                                      1,406,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,406,552 
<CGS>                                          595,326
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               490,949                     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                339,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,575                                            
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   225,125
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Terry Joe WALKER v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, et al.

No. 86-KH-1741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 15, 1987.

In re Walker, Terry Joe; applying for remedial writs; Parish of DeSoto, 11th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 43440.

Denied.