alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 35 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.35
                                          Agreed to May 26, 1999        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 27, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Monday, June 7, 1999, or until such time on 
that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in 
the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 27, 1999, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, June 7, 
1999, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
Reversed and Remanded and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed April 2, 

2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-18-00900-CV

LISSA WHYTE DOUGLAS, Appellant

V.

MARIA DEL CARMEN AGUILAR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-36005

D I S S E N T I N G O P I N I O N

This case is remarkably similar to Ginn v. Pierce, No. 14-17-00742-CV, 

2019 WL 4511328 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 19, 2019, no pet.). 

There, we reversed the trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict 

(as to liability) where defendant admitted fault. Here, defendant admitted 

responsibility and there was no evidence adduced at trial that plaintiff was 

contributorily negligent. 
2

Finding nothing to reverse and concluding the majority erroneously finds 

otherwise while ignoring our precedent, I believe the trial court’s ruling should be 

affirmed.

/s/ Meagan Hassan

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan (Zimmerer, J., majority).
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Enterasys Networks, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-50454, 33-31572, 33-96060, 33-96058, 33-33454, 33-42490, 333-83991,
333-66774, 333-50733 and 333-103587) on Form S-8 of Enterasys Networks, Inc. of
our report dated March 25, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
the Company and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2002 and December 29, 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, redeemable convertible
preferred stock and stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 28, 2002, for the ten-month period ended December 29, 2001, and for the
year ended March 3, 2001, which report appears in the December 28, 2002 Annual
Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K of Enterasys Networks, Inc.

Our audit report dated March 25, 2003 indicates that, effective December 30,
2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets. Our audit report also indicates that, effective March 4,
2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative financial
instruments and hedging activities.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 2003
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Linc Government Services, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W91GER-06-D-0006 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58565

Lea Carol Owen, Esq. Ben H. Bodzy, Esq. Joshua A. Mullen, Esq.

Baker, Donelson, Bearman,

Caldwell & Berkowitz, P.C. Nashville, TN Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney MAJ Nancy J. Lewis, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been withdrawn. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 16 June 2015

Administrativ Armed Servic oard ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58565, Appeal ofLinc Government Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

I, Shaun Passley, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer of Epazz, Inc., a Illinois corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The report on Form 10-Q of Epazz,Inc. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended March 31, 2015 (the "Report") which thisstatement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: June 16, 2015

 

 

By: */s/ Shaun Passley*

Shaun Passley, Ph.D.

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
#### Samuel SAPP, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-0259.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 9, 1988.

Samuel Sapp, pro se.

No appearance required, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *Christopher v. State,*489 So.2d 22 (Fla.1986); *Witt v. State,*465 So.2d 510 (Fla.1985); *Hathcock v. State,*505 So.2d 649 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

LETTS, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

November 6, 2019 
 Kevin Van Asdalan 

Re: Summary of Employment Terms 
 Dear Kevin, 

This letter is intended to memorialize the understanding of the changes to your employment arrangement with Montauk Energy Holdings, LLC (the
“Company”) from Controller to your new position as Chief Financial Officer. All other terms of your employment will remain unchanged. 

To that end, I am very pleased to offer you the position of Chief Financial Officer based on the key terms as outlined below. 

Position: Chief Financial Officer 

Key Responsibilities: Reporting to the President & CEO, Sean McClain, with the key responsibilities outlined on the attachment.

 Employment Start Date: Promotion Effective September 25, 2019 

Primary Job Location: Pittsburgh Corporate Office 

Base Salary: $190,000 annually. You will be paid bi-weekly on alternating Fridays via direct
deposit. 
 Bonus Target: 30% of Base Salary in accordance with the Company incentive plan. 

This offer letter does not confer any contractual right, either express or implied, to remain in the Company’s employ. Your employment is
not for any specific time and may be terminated at will, with or without cause and without prior notice, by the Company or you may resign for any reason at any time. 

Finally, I am very excited about the prospect of having you continue with our team and look forward to having your innovative ideas and
energies assist us with the challenges and opportunities ahead. If you agree with the terms set forth in this offer letter, please indicate your acceptance by signing and returning this letter as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at [redacted]. I look forward to your positive response. 













							
	 Sincerely,
	  		  		  	
				
	 /s/ Shannon R. Lewis
	  		  		  	
	 Shannon R. Lewis
	  		  		  	
	 Human Resources Manager
	  		  		  	


							
				
	 Accepted by:
	  	/s/ Kevin Van Asdalan	  		  	 Date: November 6,, 2019

		  	 Kevin Van Asdalan
	  		  	


  
 - 2 -
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. RES. 168

Paying a gratuity to Mary Lyda Nance.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 28, 1999

Mr. HELMS (for himself and Mr. BIDEN) submitted the following resolution;

which was considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Paying a gratuity to Mary Lyda Nance.

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of the Senate is author2 ized and directed to pay, from the contingent fund of the

3 Senate, to Mary Lyda Nance, widow of Admiral James

4 W. Nance, an employee of the Senate at the time of his

5 death, the sum of $200,000, that sum to be considered

6 inclusive of funeral expenses and all other allowances.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17562]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12740 and <greek-i>12741]


Texas Disaster <greek-i>X-00380

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Texas (FEMA-
1999-DR), dated 08/15/2011.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 04/06/2011 through 08/29/2011.

DATES: Effective Date: 03/15/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/14/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/14/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Texas, 
dated 08/15/2011, is hereby amended to include the following areas as 
adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Erath, Midland, Wichita.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2012-7110 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### BISCAYNE BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT, LTD., NUMBER 1, etc., et al., Appellants, v. RICHARD J. BURTON & ASSOCIATES, P.A., Appellee.

No. 88-324.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Arvin Peltz, Miami, for appellants.

Joyce M. Siemon, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Lyle v. Lyle,*167 So.2d 256 (Fla. 2d DCA), *cert, denied,*172 So.2d 601 (Fla.1964).
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British Virgin Islands international business company (the “Corporation”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:
 
 The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
 
 
 
 Date:           October 15, 2010
 
 _/s/ Albert So
 Albert So
 Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis S. STEMLEY.

No. 87-KH-2469.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 30, 1987.

In re Stemley, Louis S.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-6991; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 313-040.

Denied. This application is premature. Information from the 4th Circuit Court of Appeal establishes that that court granted a rehearing on November 3, 1987.
Citations and pin cites are based on the Westlaw online version of the cited material. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

DIVISION ONE

In the Matter of the Detention of ) No. 80936

- 9

- I

)

B.T.

- M.

, ) UNPUBLISHED OPINION

)

Appellant

. )

P ER C URIAM

— B.T.

- M. appeals a 14

- day i nvoluntary commitment order. She

contends, and the State concedes, that the order must be vacated because the court

did not adequately advise her how the order would impact her right to possess firearms,

as required by RCW 71.05.240(2). 1 See Matter of De t. of T.C. , 11 Wn. App. 2d 51, 66,

450 P.3d 1230 (2019). We accept the State’s concession, and reverse and remand for

the trial court to vacate the commitment order.

Reversed and remanded.

WE CONCUR:

1 RCW 71.05.240(2) p rovides:

If the petition is for mental health treatment, the court or the prosecutor at the time of the

probable cause hearing and before an order of commitment is entered shall inform the

person both orally and in writing that the failure to make a good f aith effort to seek

voluntary treatment as provided in RCW 71.05.230 will result in the loss of his or her

firearm rights if the person is subsequently detained for involuntary treatment under this

section.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000846538
<NAME>                        ALLOU HEALTH & BEAUTY CARE, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                              76,531
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                   48,980,564
<ALLOWANCES>                       555,682
<INVENTORY>                     96,661,103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               153,321,119
<PP&E>                           6,736,699
<DEPRECIATION>                   3,093,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 161,347,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          111,279,394
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             5,752
<OTHER-SE>                      48,221,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   161,347,795
<SALES>                        285,311,441
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               285,311,441
<CGS>                          250,843,851
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  250,843,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                21,310,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               6,614,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  6,542,648
<INCOME-TAX>                     2,484,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              4,058,535
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     4,058,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          .70
<EPS-DILUTED>                          .70
        


</TABLE>
# WALL PROCESSES Ky Stone Clay Dolomite Premiere Clay Re-Cycled GrnW are CBF Mixer Feldspar Silica Re-Cycled Dust

Water Deflocculant Slip Sieve (coarse) Pneumatic Transport Blunger Untreated Dirty
Bulk Slip Storage Piston Pumps Bulk Slip Storage Slip Sieve (fine)

Dryer Prill Storage Silos Prill Screen (fine) Spray Dryer Prill Screen (coarse)

Packaging Automatic Decorating / Glazing Line Kiln Pre Dryer Lines 1, 2, and 5 only
Palletizing Finished Goods Screen Tailings to landfill

GreenW are Re-Cycle GreenW are

Kiln Inspection Scrap to Landfill GreenW are Re-Cycle GreenW are Re-Cycle (water Treatment)

Contamin GrnW are To Landfill Contamin GrnW are To Landfill Re-Cycle Prill Pneumatic Transport Press

## PORCELAIN PROCESSES Ky Stone Dolomite Premiere Feldspar
Mill GrnW are Silica Re-Cycled Re-Cycled

GreenW are Sieve (coarse) Clay Clay Dust Deflocculant Continuous Ball Untreated Dirty Slip Silos Slip Sieve (fine)

Re-Cycle Sieve (fine) Bulk Slip Storage Bulk Slip Storage

Prill Storage Silos Prill Slip

Prill Screen (coarse) Piston Pumps Spray Dryer

Line GreenW are Dryer Decorating / Glazing Press Screen (fine)

Packaging Automatic Palletizing Landfill Storage Kiln Inspection MinSpar KT 556 Clay Raw Material

Finished Goods FiredW are Storage

Shrink Wrap Re-Cycle GreenW are Re-Cycle
Scrap to Water

City

GreenW are Re-Cycle GreenW are Water
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000846909
<NAME> CABLETRON SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                         350,980
<SECURITIES>                                   221,981
<RECEIVABLES>                                  250,056
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,684
<INVENTORY>                                     85,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,007,373
<PP&E>                                         316,830
<DEPRECIATION>                                 191,838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,166,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          559,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,836
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,147,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,166,507
<SALES>                                      1,459,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,459,593
<CGS>                                          817,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  817,844
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               484,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (66,161)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                759,021
<INCOME-TAX>                                   294,750
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            464,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   464,271
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.46



</TABLE>
50333.

#### WHITE v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION.

Submitted February 25, 1975

Decided March 4, 1975.

*Edge & Edge, John D. Edge,*for appellant.

Deen, Presiding Judge.

1. Under the decisions in *Pike v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.,*125 Ga. App. 83 (2) (186 SE2d 482) and *Leach v. Midland-Guardian Co.,*127 Ga. App. 562 (194 SE2d 260), the finance charges on this time price sale of an automobile (including insurance premiums) was not usurious.

2. So far as this record shows, no objection was entered by the appellant to the holding of a foreclosure hearing by the court without a jury, and the question cannot be raised on appeal for the first time. *Chappell v. Small,*194 Ga. 143 (2) (20 SE2d 916).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.*

*160*Rogers, Magruder & Hoyt, Karl M. Kothe,*for appellee.
#### STATE ex rel. Larry WILSON v. 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE.

No. 88-KH-0683.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Wilson, Larry; applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”, No. 10-83-576; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW87 1710.

Granted in part and denied in part. District court is ordered to provide relator with a copy of his *Boykin*examination in 10-83-576.