alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q /A, First Amendment , for the period
ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  October
      21, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
      M. CancioHugo
      M. CancioTitle:
      Principal Executive Officer
#### ECONOMY AUTO SALVAGE, INC. v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY and Ronnie Nelson and Causey Insurance Agency, Inc.

No. 86-C-2208.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Dec. 12, 1986.

In re Allstate Insurance Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-786; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 120477.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 963.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIALREPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 to which thiscertification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 
| **Date:  November 14, 2008** | ** ** | ** **                                               |
|-----------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |       | /s/ Dale B.  Herbst                                      |
|                              |       | Name: Dale B.  Herbst                                    |
|                              |       | Title: Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF VICE PRESIDENT OF CORPORATE FINANCE


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Universal Travel Group (the
"Company"), does hereby certify under the standards set forth and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 11, 2009
              /s/ Jing XieJing
      Xie
                Chief
      Financial Officer
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 114

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas over 4 million Americans served in World War I,

however, there is no nationally recognized symbol honoring the service of such Americans;

Whereas in 1919, citizens of Kansas City expressed an outpouring of support, raising over $2,000,000 in 2 weeks,

which was a fundraising accomplishment unparalleled by

any other city in the United States irrespective of population;

Whereas on November 1, 1921, the monument site was dedicated marking the only time in history that the 5 Allied

military leaders (Lieutenant General Baron Jacques of

Belgium, General Armando Diaz of Italy, Marshal Ferdinand Foch of France, General John J. Pershing of the

United States, and Admiral Lord Earl Beatty of Great

Britain) were together at one place;

Whereas during a solemn ceremony on Armistice Day in

1924, President Calvin Coolidge marked the beginning of

a 3-year construction project by the laying of the cornerstone of the Liberty Memorial;

Whereas the 217-foot Memorial Tower topped with 4 stone

‘‘Guardian Spirits’’ representing courage, honor, patriotism, and sacrifice, rises above the observation deck, mak-
2

SCON 114 ES

ing the Liberty Memorial a noble tribute to all who

served;

Whereas during a rededication of the Liberty Memorial in

1961, former Presidents Harry S. Truman and Dwight

D. Eisenhower recognized the memorial as a constant reminder of the sacrifices during World War I and the

progress that followed;

Whereas the Liberty Memorial is the only public museum in

the United States specifically dedicated to the history of

World War I; and

Whereas the Liberty Memorial is internationally known as a

major center of World War I remembrance: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Liberty Memorial in Kansas City,

3 Missouri, is recognized as a national World War I symbol,

4 honoring those who defended liberty and our country

5 through service in World War I.

Passed the Senate October 12 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 114

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Liberty Memorial in Kansas City,

Missouri, as a national World War I symbol honoring those who defended liberty and our countrythrough service in World War I.
Exhibit 31.1

302(a) CERTIFICATIONS

I, Cindy K. Swank, certify that:



1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of APD Antiquities, Inc.;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness  of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.



5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)  all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: July 11, 2007

/s/ Cindy K. Swank



Cindy K. Swank, President

Chief Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 25, 2020.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D19-1296

Lower Tribunal No. 18-16901

________________

Rondell Lyles,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Charles K. 

Johnson, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Deborah Prager, Assistant Public 

Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Gabrielle Raemy Charest-Turken, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
___________

No. 96-1260

___________

Frank Christian Nichols, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 23, 1996

 Filed: August 30, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Christian Nichols pleaded guilty to drug and firearm charges,

and was sentenced to 80 months imprisonment. He did not appeal. Nichols

then filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, asserting that there was not a

sufficient factual basis for the gun charge and that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel. Relief was denied, and we affirmed.

Nichols v. United States, No. 93-2067, 1993 WL 474108 (8th Cir. Nov. 19,

1993) (unpublished per curiam). In May 1995, Nichols filed the instant

section 2255 motion, asserting only that his criminal convictions and

sentence violated the Double Jeopardy Clause's prohibition against multiple

punishments for the same offense, because approximately $22,000, a truck,

and a boat seized from him at the time of his arrest had been
 The Honorable Elsijane Trimble Roy, United States District Court 1

for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and

recommendation of the Honorable H. David Young, United States

Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

forfeited to the government. The district court denied this motion on the 1

merits, and Nichols appeals.

Although Nichols may have procedurally defaulted the double jeopardy

issue, and his second section 2255 motion may constitute an abuse of the

writ, we address the merits because the district court did so. See

Rodriguez v. United States, 17 F.3d 225, 226 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).

We conclude that Nichols's double jeopardy claim is foreclosed for the

reasons set forth in United States v. Ursery, 115 S. Ct. 2135, 2148-49

(1996) (holding civil forfeitures under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6) and (7) are

neither "punishment" nor criminal for purposes of Double Jeopardy Clause),

and United States v. One 1970 36.9' Columbia Sailing Boat, No. 95-3158,

1996 WL 403038, at *3-4 (8th Cir. July 19, 1996) (holding Ursery applies

to forfeitures under § 881(a)(4)).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### In the Matter of DONAHOE’S, INCORPORATED, Debtor. In the Matter of GEO. K. STEVENSON COMPANY, Debtor; Donahoe’s, Incorporated Preferred and Class A Stockholders’ Protective Association, Appellant.

No. 7237.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Nov. 27, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 10, 1940.

Louis S. Posner, of New York City, and Reich & Reich and Eli E. Reich, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioners.

Stewart Lynch, of Wilmington, Del., for appellees.

Before MARIS, BIDDLE, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion of counsel for the debtors, it is hereby ordered that the appeal in the. above entitled matter be,'.and the same is hereby dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   270,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                     10,000
<INVENTORY>                                     136,836
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                433,730
<PP&E>                                          557,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                  442,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  640,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         1,168,310
<BONDS>                                          51,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                       3,692
<COMMON>                                         17,191
<OTHER-SE>                                     (600,545)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    640,606
<SALES>                                       1,303,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,303,335
<CGS>                                           903,068
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   903,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,011,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              156,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (733,641)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (733,641)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (733,641)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing Tax Credits, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section1350, as adopted pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: June 27, 2011
#### Ruth Fried, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harry Fried, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*Bernard C. Glueck, Jr., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Kings County,

October 20, 1958.

*424
      *Harry Gair*and *Martin Israel*for plaintiff,

Benjamin Brenner, J.

Plaintiff administratrix presents an order embodying the terms of a settlement in a wrongful death action commenced under limited letters of administration issued to her by the Surrogate’s Court pursuant to section 122 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. She requests that the moneys be apportioned among the persons eligible to receive same and that the administratrix be allowed to receive and disburse such moneys.

Section 133 of the Decedent Estate Law amply empowers the Supreme Court as the “ court having jurisdiction of the action,” not only to settle the action, but to determine the proportions in which said moneys are to be distributed, thus indicating that this is not an exclusive function of the Surrogate’s Court.

But the question presented is whether “ the court having jurisdiction of the action ’ ’ can and should also provide for the receipt and distribution of these sums. The administratrix is here acting under section 122 of the Surrogate’s Court Act which provides for the issuance of limited letters and restrains her “ from compromise of the action or the enforcement of any judgment recovered therein until the further order of the surrogate made upon filing satisfactory security. ’ ’

In *Amo*v. *Leonard*(262 App. Div. 467) and *Matter of Amo*(264 App. Div. 516) narrow construction of section 122 was rejected as not hampering compromise of a wrongful death action by courts other than the Surrogate’s Court, even where limited letters were first procured from the latter court, it being noted that the primary purpose of the statute was to see that ample security be given so that the persons who had suffered pecuniary loss would be protected.

However, unless overriding circumstances warrant its full exercise, this power should be limited to the settlement of the cause and where, as here, the persons entitled to damages appear to be obvious, such power may extend to apportionment as well. The Surrogate’s Court is otherwise peculiarly competent to deal with notices and hearings relative to apportionment and the appointment, conduct and discharge of special guardians.

The only persons entitled to the proceeds of the settlement in the instant application being the widow and child of the deceased, the order presented will be limited to an allowance of the terms of settlement, the discharge of the defendants from liability and the proportions to be distributed; leave for receipt and distribution of the funds and requirements for security, if any, are to be authorized by the Surrogate’s Court.

Order signed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of American Cordillera Mining Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended May 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Dwight Weigelt, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: October 20, 2014

|  

By:

/s/ Dwight Weigelt

 

 

Dwight Weigelt

 

 

CFO, Secretary, Treasurer, Director |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
All PM test data from 2003 survey, ICR, Florida DEP, and PCA - Duplicates removed or multiple tests averaged

Test No. Data Source Company Location Kiln ID Raw MillOn/Off TestStart Date Wtd avg emissions (lb/tonclinker) Notes

1 PCA comments on NSPS Mitsubishi Lucerne V 1 on/off Apr02&Mar98 0.01 3 separate tests avera2 2003 Survey Lafarge Sugar Creek, MO Kiln Off 0.01 PCA result was incomp3 PCA comments on NSPS cemex xenia 1 on/off mar02 0.024 PCA & ICR lafarge harleyville kiln on/off oct06&Jun02 0.04 2 separate tests comb5 Florida DEP Florida Rock Industries Newberry, FL Kiln/raw mill Line 1 N.R. 7/20/2004 0.056 PCA comments on NSPS holcim theodore 1 on/off Jul02 0.067 NESHAP ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 2 (Humbolt) - TDF N.A. 7/13/2005 0.068 PCA comments on NSPS cemex louisville 1 on feb01 0.079 Florida DEP CEMEx Brooksville, FL Kiln #2 N.R. 3/10/2003 0.09

10 Florida DEP CEMEX Brooksville, FL Kiln #1 N.R. 12/13/2006 0.0911 PCA comments on NSPS holcim florence 1 on/off Oct02&Jun03 0.09 2 separate tests comb12 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #1 (April 2002) N.R. 0.1013 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Glen Falls, NY Kiln On 2/22/2006 0.1114 ICR Ash Grove Louisville, NE Kiln 1(ACL) Dec-90 0.1215 2003 Survey Illinois LaSalle, IL Kiln On 0.1416 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 5 on/off jun04&Aug02 0.14 2 separate tests comb17 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 2 NA dec02 0.1518 ICR Lone Star Ogelsby, IL Kiln Nov-99 0.1619 NESHAP ICR Lehigh Mitchell, IN Kiln 1(after modification) N.A. 12/16/2003 0.2320 PCA comments on NSPS GCC Rio G Tijeras 1 NA dec02 0.2521 PCA comments on NSPS Monarch Humbold 4 NA Aug02 0.2822 PCA & ICR lafarge joppa 2 NA nov04&9/25/2002 0.41 2 separate tests comb23 2003 Survey Mountain Laramie, WY Kiln #2, Mill On 4/1/2002 0.4224 PCA comments on NSPS lehigh mitchell 3 NA dec02 0.4525 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 3 Feb-97 1.0526 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 1 Feb-97 1.2927 ICR Lone Star Pryor Kiln 2 Feb-97 1.2928 ICR Ash Grove Seattle, WA Kiln Jul-92 1.44
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2458 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain liquid-filled glass 

bulbs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

liquid-filled glass bulbs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LIQUID-FILLED GLASS BULBS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain liquid-filled glass bulbs) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2458 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS