alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 96

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (AHEPA) has provided 78 years of service to

Greek-Americans and to American society and is continuing to serve into the twenty-first century through its

20,000 active members in 521 chartered chapters;

Whereas the mission of AHEPA is to promote the ideals of

Hellenism, which include philanthropy, education, civic

responsibility, and family and individual excellence;

Whereas since its inception, AHEPA has instilled in its members an understanding of their Hellenic heritage and an

awareness of the contributions made to the development

of democratic principles and governance in the United

States and throughout the world;

Whereas AHEPA has done much throughout its history to

foster American patriotism;

Whereas AHEPA has fostered patriotism by raising

$162,000,000 for United States War Bonds during

World War II, for which AHEPA was named an official

Issuing Agent for United States War Bonds by the

United States Treasury Department, an honor that no

other civic organization was able to achieve at the time;

Whereas the members of AHEPA have fostered patriotism by

donating over $400,000 collectively toward the restora-
2

SCON 96 ES

tion of the Statute of Liberty and Ellis Island, New

York, for which AHEPA received special recognition by

the Department of the Interior;

Whereas members of AHEPA and its affiliated organizations,

the Daughters of Penelope, Sons of Pericles and Maids

of Athena, served in the Armed Forces of the United

States to protect American freedom and to preserve those

democratic ideals which are part of the Hellenic legacy;

and

Whereas on Monday, March 20, 2000, AHEPA is honoring

the members of the AHEPA family who are veterans of

service in the Armed Services by presenting those members with a special commemorative AHEPA Medal for

Military Service at the 2000 AHEPA Family Biennial

Banquet in Washington, District of Columbia: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) joins the American Hellenic Educational

4 Progressive Association (AHEPA) in recognizing the

5 members of the AHEPA family whose service as

6 members of the Armed Forces of the United States

7 and sacrifices made in such service have contributed

8 so much to the preservation of freedom for Ameri9 cans and for so many others throughout the world;

10 and

11 (2) acknowledges the honor with which that

12 service is being commemorated by the presentation
3

SCON 96 ES

1 of the special commemorative AHEPA Medal for

2 Military Service to those members at the AHEPA

3 Family Biennial Banquet in Washington, District of

4 Columbia, on Monday, March 20, 2000.

Passed the Senate March 20, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 96

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the members of the

American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association (AHEPA) who are being awarded theAHEPA Medal for Military Service for service inthe Armed Forces of the United States.
#### EXECUTIVE OFFICE CENTERS, INC. v. Henry R.J. COURNOYER.

No. 87-C-2112.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Cournoyer, Henry R.J.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6762; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E”, No. 85-2282.

Prior report: La.App., 510 So.2d 735.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
13.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British Virgin
Islands international business company (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 20-F")
of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.











Dated:October 20,
      2009





/s/ Albert
      So


Albert
      So


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 58 (Monday, March 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17479]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 19, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Kenneth Binning, Vice 
President, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San 
Francisco, California 94105-1579:
    1. CU Bancorp, Encino, California to become a bank holding company 
by acquiring 100 percent of California United Bank, also of Encino. CU 
Bancorp also has applied to acquire Premier Commercial Bancorp, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Premier Commercial Bank, N.A., both of 
Anaheim, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 20, 
2012.
Jennifer J. Johnson,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-7113 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Jiangping Jiang, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Universal
Travel Group.

      2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
and

            b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design
or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and

            b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Date: August 2007                    /s/ Jiangping Jiang
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Name: Jiangping Jiang
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                     (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TYISHA MICHELLE JONES,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00269-CR

Appeal from the

120th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20130D06247)

O R D E R

On January 31, 2017, Justin B. Underwood, Appellant’s retained attorney, filed with this 

Court a motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, but the motion does not contain the 

Appellant’s signature as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 42.2. The motion states that Appellant has 

moved out of Texas, and Mr. Underwood is unable to locate her. Rule 42.2 does not permit the 

Court to dismiss the appeal without Appellant’s signature on the motion unless the record 

affirmatively reflects that Appellant no longer wishes to appeal. There is nothing in the record 

showing that Appellant does not wish to pursue the appeal. Accordingly, the motion to dismiss 

is DENIED. Further, the Reporter’s Record is now due March 8, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6

th day of February, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### Gloria D. McCRAY and the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Appellants, v. James D. McCRAY, Appellee.

No. 87-1807.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 1, 1988.

Joseph R. Boyd, Joseph A. Boyd, Jr., and William H. Branch of Boyd & Branch, P.A., and Chriss Walker, Dept, of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, for appellants.

No appearance for appellee.

*988PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal an order dismissing their petition for enforcement of support obligations which was brought in Madison County where the mother and children reside. Although the father admitted he did not make the required child support payments, the trial court declined to rule on the petition reasoning that the enforcement action should have been brought in Jefferson County, where the parties were divorced, rather than Madison County. However, section 61.17, Florida Statutes, a special venue statute, permits an action to enforce child support payments to be brought in the county where the mother, the person to whom the child support is payable, resides. *Waterhouse v. Pringle,*68 So.2d 599 (Fla.1953); and *Hughes v. Hughes,*441 So.2d 688 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1983).

REVERSED.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
#### Antonio Fernandez CONDE, Appellant, v. SUNBANK/MIAMI, S.A., Appellee.

No. 87-2272.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 1, 1988.

Luis E. Rojas, Hialeah, for appellant.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Victor S. Kline, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

*330PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appellant’s seeking relief, if appropriate, under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b)(5).
Exhibit 32.2



|               |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

Date: May 10, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ THOMAS W. CASEY    
|Name:  |  | Thomas W. Casey        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### APPLIANCE AND HEATING SUPPLY, INC., dba A & H Supply Co., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. James A. TELAROLI, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 19450.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 14, 1984.

*868Randy S. Ludlow, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

Robert C. Liljenquist, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff, an Idaho corporation, sold appliances to the Telco Co., a Utah corporation. The latter had established a line of credit with the former. The defendant, Telaroli, was the president and sole owner of Telco. In 1979 Telco entered into a construction contract that called for a substantial increase in purchases from plaintiff. To secure the account, the plaintiff through its representative approached Tela-roli with an agreement.

The first paragraph of the agreement called for payment on the tenth of the month, failing which, the signatory agreed to pay the amount due plus invoiced interest.

The second paragraph provided that such signatory agreed to pay amounts due, waiving presentment, demand and notice of non-payment, “as principal and not as surety.” Telaroli objected to the paragraph, which was deleted by the plaintiff’s representative by way of an initialed cross-out.

The third paragraph authorized a credit rating inquiry, with an indemnity against any claim arising out of such inquiry.

The fourth paragraph contained a statement binding the signatory to all the terms of the agreement and that the “undersigned, being an officer, shareholder ... agrees to the above terms (except paragraph two) and assumes *personal*responsibility for the payment of said corporation’s account, and guarantees in full that said account will be promptly paid. It is understood that credit will not be extended to said corporation without this assumption of liability and guarantee.”

The plaintiff’s agent told Telaroli that if he did not sign the agreement, extended credit (which thereafter produced a $67,000 balance due and unpaid) would not be available. Telaroli thereafter signed the document, followed by the word “president,” which he claimed, in refusing to make payment, absolved him from personal liability. Such contention flies in the teeth of the language of the fourth paragraph of the agreement above. There is no ambiguity in such language. Telaroli’s effort to create such an ambiguity is based solely upon comparing such language with that which was excluded expressly by the parties. Such contention cannot shroud the remaining language with doubt. The authorities cited by Telaroli are inapropos, since they are structured on language con-cededly vulnerable to different meanings. A recent decision of this Court,1 recounting strikingly similar facts and referring to authorities discounting almost every defensive argument presented by Telaroli here, appears to be dispositive. The claims that the attorney’s fee award was excessive is not reflected in the record, particularly since the trial judge reduced the claim asserted by the plaintiff in a substantial amount.

The judgment is affirmed with costs on appeal to the plaintiff.

1

. *Boise Cascade v. Stonewood Development,*Utah, 655 P.2d 668 (1982).
EX-4.8





 Exhibit 4.8 

FORM 51-102F3 

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT 
  

	Item 1.	 Name and Address of Company 



Docebo Inc. (the “Company”) 

366 Adelaide Street West 

Toronto, Ontario 
 M5V 1R7 

 

	Item 2.	 Date of Material Change 



October 1, 2020 
  

	Item 3.	 News Release 



Attached as Schedule “A” is a copy of the press release relating to the material change, which was disseminated on October 1,
2020 through the newswire services of Cision and filed on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval. 
  

	Item 4.	 Summary of Material Change 



On October 1, 2020, the Company announced that Daniel Klass has provided notice of his intention to resign as a director of the Company,
effective October 1, 2020. Mr. Klass has been on the Company’s board of directors since 2016. 
  

	Item 5.	 Full Description of Material Change 



For a full description of the material change, please see Schedule “A” attached hereto. 

 

	Item 6.	 Reliance on Subsection 7.1(2) of National Instrument 51-102



 Not applicable. 
  

	Item 7.	 Omitted Information 



Not applicable. 
  

	Item 8.	 Executive Officer 



The name and business telephone number of the officer of the Company who can answer questions regarding this material change report is as
follows: 












 Ian Kidson, Chief Financial Officer 

Tel: (416) 456-5868 
  

	Item 9.	 Date of Report 



October 5, 2020 

  
 2 













 SCHEDULE “A” 

(see attached) 

  
 3 













 



 
 Docebo Announces Director Resignation 

TORONTO, October 1, 2020 – Docebo Inc. (TSX: DCBO) (“Docebo” or the “Company”), today announced that Daniel Klass has provided
notice of his intention to resign as a Director of the Company, effective today, to devote more time to his private equity business. Mr. Klass has been on Docebo’s board of directors since 2016. 

“Since joining Docebo’s board of directors as a small private company, I’ve been privileged to have a part in its growth and development.
Claudio and his team have built an enduring organization and I look forward to seeing its continued evolution as a global leader in corporate learning management,” said Daniel Klass, Founder and Managing Partner of Klass Capital. 

“Daniel has been an instrumental supporter of Docebo and has always shared my passion and vision for the learning opportunity,” said Claudio Erba,
Founder and CEO of Docebo. “On behalf of our management team and board of directors I want to thank him for his guidance over the years and wish him the best on his current and future endeavors.” 

About Docebo 
 Docebo is redefining the way enterprises
learn by applying new technologies to the traditional corporate learning management system market. Docebo provides an easy-to-use, highly configurable learning
platform with the end-to-end capabilities designed to make customers, partners, and employees love their learning experience. 

For more information: 
 Dennis Fong 

Investor Relations 
 investors@docebo.com 

(416) 283-9930 

  
 4
#### Benoit BALTHAZAR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-1413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 23, 1988.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Louis G. Carres, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carolyn V. McCann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction and apply the preponderance of the evidence standard of proof for evaluating the voluntariness of the defendant’s confession.

The preponderance of the evidence standard has been generally applied in Florida cases where the voluntariness of a defendant’s confession is at issue. *See McDole v. State,*283 So.2d 553 (Fla.1973). We apply it here where the defendant is alleged to have a limited understanding of English. We agree with the state’s assertion that although its burden in proving voluntariness is a heavy one in such circumstances, the standard of proof does not change from a preponderance of the evidence standard to a clear and convincing one. See *DeCo-ningh v. State,*433 So.2d 501, 503 (Fla. 1983); *Rodriguez v. State,*287 So.2d 395, 396-97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973).

GLICKSTEIN, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
May 25 , 2012

Ms. Colleen Gillespie

Chief Wastewater Permitting Unit

U.S. EPA, Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202

- 8917

Re: Section 401 Water Quality Certification for Proposed 2013 Vessel General Permit (s)

Dear Ms. Gillespie :

This letter is intended to clarify the water quality certification issu ed May 10, 2012 for EPA ’ s vessel

general permit. That certification applies to both the Vessel General Permit and the Small Vessel

General P ermit.

If you have any questions, ple ase give me a call at 303

- 692

- 3 59 9

Sincerely,

Janet Kieler

Permits Section Manager

Cc: File : 401 Certifications

– Federal Facilities

– Vessel General Permit
Document

Exhibit 10(y)(y)(y)

AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


HP INC. 
2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


The HP Inc. 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective as of September 21, 2020:


1.The second paragraph of Section 5.4 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


“Notwithstanding Section 3.1, if the Plan Committee approves a distribution under this Section, or a hardship distribution under the HP Inc. 401(k) Plan, the Participant's deferrals under the Plan shall cease for the remainder of that calendar year.  The Participant will be allowed to enroll if eligible at the beginning of the next enrollment period for the following calendar year.”


In all other respects the Plan, as amended herein, is hereby ratified and confirmed.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, HP Inc. has caused this instrument to be signed by its duly authorized officer as of this 27th day of September, 2020.


HP INC.


By: /s/ Tracy Keogh                        


Its: Chief Human Resources Officer