alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N
UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S
FO R T H E NINT HCIRCUIT

JUDIT HRO M O ; V INCE NT T AL DO NE ; RO B IN T AYL E R; M ARGARE T T AYL O R; RANDY T AYL O R; RAY T E E T S; L AW RE NCE T E L L S; K

AT H RYN T E M CH ACK ; CH A RL E S T E RRY; V E RO N ICA T E RRY; RO B E RT A T H O RNE ; M ARGARE T T IV IS; L INDA T O DD; DE L O RE S T O O H E Y; DE B RA T O URV IL L E ; DE NA T SO UAL S; AL L E N T URNE R; CARO L YN T URNE R; WANDA T URNE R; ST ARL E T T YRO NE ; G L O RIA UNDE RW O O D ; H E NRY UNDE RW O O D ; JANICE VANISO N; W IL L IAMV E RH E YE N ; CH ARL E S V IL DIB IL L ; SH ARO N WAL L G RE N; PAMWAL SH ; SH A RO N WAL SH ; KE E SH A WARRIO R; L AT ANGA WASH ING T O N; DARL E NE WAT T ; JAM E S W E I SS; W E SL E Y W E L B O RNE , III; DE B RA W H E E L E R; M ARSH AW H IT T ; CARO L YN W H YNO ; CE C IL IA W IL CKE NS; SANDRA W IL E M O N; ST E L L A W IL KE RSO N-CL ARK ; JO ANN W IL L IAM S; JO YCE W IL L IAM S; RO SE W I L L IAM S; SH ANT AS W IL L IAM S; M ARY W IL SO N; RO SE W IL SO N; PAT SY W INZ E Y; JIM M IE W ISE ; RUT H W O L FSO N; JUANIT A W O O DSO N; No. 13-56310
D.C . No. 5:12-c v-02036-PSG-E

O R DE R 

# F IL ED

F EB 10 2014

M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F A PPEALSPa ge 2

L YNNE WYSO CK

Y, singleindividuals , Plaintiffs - Appe lle e s,

v. T E VA PH ARMACE UT ICAL S USA, INC. , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt.

M ARGAL IT CO RB E R ; RE NE CARO ; ST E V E DANT Z L E R; L INDA SO WARDS; L O RI H UISMAN; JO H NNY G E O RG E , Sr .; T E RRY PE RRY; W IL L IAMRACK L E Y; ANG E L A YO UNG ; PAM E L A RO D RIG UE Z ; ST E VE N SYV E RSO N; O L GA CAICO YA; JANE T CARRO L L ; RO SE CASH ; UL AD CE L E NT ANO ; V IRG INIA CO ST ANZ O ; KIM B E RL Y FIL L IG IM ; ARM E L DIA SM I T H ; CARL A W E ST ; JO ANNE B IE RZ Y NSKI, individually and as ne xt of k

i n to E le anorW ojc ik ; SH ARL E Y M O RRIS; WYO M IA T IM M O NS; DE AN RE I NKING ; DANIE L T H O RNE ; W E NDE L E N ASH B Y; CARM E N B E D FO RD; CL AUDE CO M M O DO RE ; JAM E S H E NSO N; NANCY L O CKE ; M IL DRE D SCO T T ; B IL L IE B URNE T T ; SH E E NA H AL L ; B RE NDA RO B E R G E , individually and as ne xt of k

in to E r ne st Robe r ge ; No. 13-56306
D.C . No. 2:12-c v-09986-PSG-EPa ge 3

DE B O RAHW O O DSUM ; RICH ARD PASCUIT O , Plaintiffs - Appe lle e s,

v. XANO DYNE PH ARMACE UT ICAL S, INC. , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt.

K O Z I NSKI , C hie f Judge : Upon thevoteof a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tivejudge s, it is ordere d tha t the s e c a se s bere he ard e n ba nc pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a) and C irc u i t R

ule35-3. Thethre e -judgepa ne l opinion in R

om o v. Te va Pharm a c e utic a ls USA, Inc ., No. 13-56310, sha ll not bec i te d a s pre c e de nt by or to

any c ourt of theNinth C i rc uit. JudgeM c K e own did not pa rtic ipate in thede libe rations or vote in this c a se
.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Liu ChuanjieName:
Liu ChuanjieTitle:
Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial andAccounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Richard ZINN, Trustee, Appellant, v. MIMS & THOMAS MIAMI COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 86-1591.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 24, 1987.

Lieberman, Kobrin, Burke and Pathman and Ronald C. Pathman, Miami, for appellant.

Swope and Stobs and Glenn J. Sneider, Miami Shores, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 83.04, Fla.Stat. (1985).
Exhibit 32.2

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bremer Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 18, 2004 (the Periodic Report), I, Robert B.
Buck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|1. | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated: | March 18, 2004 | /s/ Robert B. Buck
Robert B. Buck
Chief Financial Officer
Bremer Financial Corporation
|------ | -------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (a)   | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b)   |  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     March 16, 2011 |     /s/ Jeffrey A. Cook                                                      |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Jeffrey A. CookExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #14-2005 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      13, 2008
Date: 20161025
To: Department ofTransportation Dockets Office From: Michael Binder dba Penn Aerial Imaging, LLC

# 01.~~8~-~RfN Subject: Removal ofDocket Submission ID

# FAA-201!~~FA.A-200~-0.001-0001) 

# ··1-3 p ,., ... DOCKET**OPER~i\ON~~,** .Y To whom it may concern,

I am writing to request that my'submission to the docket for exemption pursuant to Section 333 be removed. This exemptionrequest is no longer required due to the recent policy changes for commercial unmanned aerial vehicle operations. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to contact me at the information provided below.
Regards,



# /f1/j'1-- Michael Binder Owner and Operator ofPenn Aerial Imaging pennaerialimaging@gmail.com
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23 (A)
                                                                  --------------



                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------


The Board of Directors
Iroquois Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements Nos. 33-
36826, 33-36827, 33-36828, 33-94214 and 333-10063 on Form S-8 and No. 33-36825
on Form S-3 of Iroquois Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Iroquois Bancorp, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Iroquois Bancorp, Inc.




   /s/KPMG LLP
----------------
KPMG LLP

Syracuse, New York
March 10, 2000
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 67

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas the 200th anniversary of the establishment of the

seat of government in the District of Columbia will be observed in the year 2000;

Whereas November 17, 2000, will mark the bicentennial of

the occupation of the United States Capitol by the Senate

and the House of Representatives; and

Whereas the story of the design and construction of the

United States Capitol deserves wider attention: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring),

3 SECTION 1. PRINTING OF ‘‘THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL: A

4 CHRONICLE OF CONSTRUCTION, DESIGN,

5 AND POLITICS’’.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be printed as a Senate

7 document the book entitled ‘‘The United States Capitol:

8 A Chronicle of Construction, Design, and Politics’’, pre9 pared by the Architect of the Capitol.

10 (b) SPECIFICATIONS.—The Senate document de11 scribed in subsection (a) shall include illustrations and
2

SCON 67 ES

1 shall be in the style, form, manner, and binding as di2 rected by the Joint Committee on Printing after consulta3 tion with the Secretary of the Senate.

4 (c) NUMBER OF COPIES.—In addition to the usual

5 number of copies, there shall be printed with suitable bind6 ing the lesser of—

7 (1) 6,500 copies for the use of the Senate, the

8 House of Representatives, and the Architect of the

9 Capitol, to be allocated as determined by the Sec10 retary of the Senate; or

11 (2) a number of copies that does not have a

12 total production and printing cost of more than

13 $143,000.

Passed the Senate November 2, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 67

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To authorize the printing of ‘‘The United States

Capitol: A Chronicle of Construction, Design,and Politics’’.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 25, 2015

p0318

Order 

Clerk

March 25, 2015

150086

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150086

COA: 322674

Isabella CC: 2013-001630-FH

DONALD JOSEPH BREWCZYNSKI, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 21, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2364 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 50% Homopolymer, 3-(Dimethylamino) 

Propyl Amide, Di-Me Sulfate-Quaternized 50% Polyricinoleic Acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 50% Homopolymer, 

3-(Dimethylamino) Propyl Amide, Di-Me SulfateQuaternized 50% Polyricinoleic Acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 50% HOMOPOLYMER, 3-(DIMETHYLAMINO) 

4 PROPYL AMIDE, DI-ME SULFATE5 QUATERNIZED 50% POLYRICINOLEIC ACID. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2364 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 50% Homopolymer, 3- 

(Dimethylamino) Propyl 

Amide, Di-Me SulfateQuaternized 50% 

Polyricinoleic Acid (provided 

for in subheading 

3824.90.40) ........................... 0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-83653); on Form S-3/A (No. 333-67361) and on
Forms S-8 and S-3 (Nos. 333-88712) of our report dated March 24, 2000,
except for Note 2 and the last three paragraphs of Note 7, as to which the
date is April 14, 2000 relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appear in Hudson Hotels Corporation Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 1999. We also consent to the reference to us
under the headings "Experts" in such Registration Statements.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Rochester, New York
April 24, 2000
#### Rodney MILLS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-3294.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 9, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corees, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence is affirmed, however, we strike the costs imposed without benefit of notice and hearing. The state may seek reimposition of those costs after appropriate notice and hearing. *Jenkins v. State,*444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); *Dilla v. State,*503 So.2d 1316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Gary P. SIMPSON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden.

No. 87-KH-0996.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Simpson, Gary P.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus or habeas corpus; Parish *140of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 181-156.

Denied on showing made.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44158

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DANIEL JESUS ALONZO JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 720

Filed: October 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin 

Falls County. Hon. Randy J. Stoker, District Judge. 

Appeal from judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of four years, for felony injury to a child, 

dismissed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. 

Swinford, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Daniel Jesus Alonzo, Jr. pled guilty to felony injury to a child. I.C. §§ 18-1501(1), 18-

112A. The parties entered into a binding Idaho Criminal Rule 11 plea agreement. Pursuant to 

the plea agreement, Alonzo waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion regarding the initial 

judgment and to appeal any issues including all matters involving the plea or his sentence. The 

district court sentenced Alonzo to a unified term of eight years with four years determinate and 

retained jurisdiction. Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court relinquished 

jurisdiction. Alonzo filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reconsideration of his sentence, which the 
2

district court denied. Alonzo appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by 

denying his Rule 35 motion.

We hold that Alonzo’s appellate challenge to the denial of the Rule 35 motion has been 

waived by his plea agreement. See I.C.R. 11(f)(1); State v. Rodriguez, 142 Idaho 786, 787, 133 

P.3d 1251, 1252 (Ct. App. 2006). Alonzo’s plea agreement contained a clause by which Alonzo

waived his right to file a Rule 35 motion. Accordingly, we dismiss Alonzo’s appeal.
#### Sheila WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1886.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 4, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and May L. Cain, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Mark S. Dunn, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appel-lee.

Before HUBBART, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant Sheila Williams from judgments of conviction and sentences for attempted first-degree murder and armed kidnapping. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

As to the defendant’s first point on appeal, we find no reversible error presented on this record based on the trial court’s reprimand to defense counsel in the presence of the jury. *Baisden v. State,*203 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). As to the defendant’s second point on appeal, we accept the state’s confession of error that the trial court improperly reclassified the defendant’s convictions from first-degree felonies to life felonies under Section 775.-087(1), Florida Statutes (1985), because the defendant did not have a weapon or firearm in her *personal*possession or readily available to her as required by the above statute for the upward reclassification of a felony conviction. *Compare Earnest v. State,*351 So.2d 957 (Fla.1977) (Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1985) requires personal possession; possession by accomplice insufficient for imposition of three-year mandatory sentence); *Menendez v. State,*521 So.2d 210, 212 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (enhancement under § 775.081(1), Fla.Stat.(1985) permissible where evidence shows defendant had weapon “readily available,” though not in actual “physical possession”); *Smith v. State,*438 So.2d 10, 14 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (same; weapon “within [defendant’s] immediate grasp”), *rev; denied,*447 So.2d 888 (Fla.1984); *Postell v. State,*383 So.2d 1159, 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (defendant “must personally possess the weapon during commission of crime” for enhancement to be appropriate).

We therefore affirm the judgments of conviction for attempted first-degree murder and armed kidnapping, but modify such judgments to indicate that the subject convictions are first-degree felonies, not life felonies. We also affirm the sentences imposed as (1) they are concededly within *1034the sentencing guidelines for the subject convictions as first-degree felonies, and (2) the record affirmatively reflects that the trial judge would have imposed these sentences even if he had treated the convictions as first-degree felonies.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), WenXiang Ding, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ WenXiang DingWenXiang DingChief Executive Officer and PresidentDated: July 18, 2008
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Small UAS Certificate of Registration 

CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Robert Oardano 

UAS CI!RTIFICATE NUMBER: FA3EYK9CRA 

ISSUED: 12/21/2015 EXPIRES: 12/21/2018 

For US. cilizM$ P"""""""' resident$ lltld cerl8innoo-dlizen US. corporations, 

this document comlitutes a Cerlilicare of Regslrafion. For all other$ this doatmenl 

-enls are<:<>gnitiooofowntN$/Up. 

For all holden, for •« operations other thilfl asa model aircraft undenec. 316 of 

Pub. L. 112· !J!i Bdditiooill safely authority from FM lltld economic authority from 

DOT maybe required 

S.felyguidellne•lorflylngyour........,nedaircr..!t: 

• Ay below 400 feet • Neller fly over stadiums, sports 

• Never fly near other aircraft events or groups of people 

• Keep your UAS within visual line • Never fly under the influence of 

of sight drugs or alcohol 

• Keep away from emergency • Neller fly within 5 miles of an responders airport without first contacting air 

'IJ'affic control and airport 

authorilies 

D--f ;:[ P~ 11Jo M 

R~~ tsf~tAfJOY\ 

http s: 1 {reg i stermyua s. faa .gov /restricted# /certificate 12/21/'15, 10:35 PM 

Page 1 of 1