alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August      14, 2008 | /s/      Robert S. DeMeulemeester |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                   | Robert      S. DeMeulemeester     |
|                                   | Chief      Financial Officer      |
|                                   |                              |
Exhibit 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
33-51341 of CBR Brewing Company, Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated April 10,
2003, except for the 3rd paragraph of Note 23, as to which the date is April 15,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CBR Brewing
Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002 and April 10, 2003 with
respect to the financial statements of Zhaoqing Blue Ribbon Brewery Noble
Limited for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of CBR Brewing Company, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

Hong Kong
May 12, 2003


                                       84
<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Center: Mass Spectrometry Resource for Biology and Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         April 1-3, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         8 p.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Westin Copley Place Hotel, 10 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02116.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mike Radtke, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4176, MSC 7806, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1728,                         *radtkem@csr.nih.gov*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 15, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-6953 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SafetyProducts Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended July 1, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Peterson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| Dated: August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT A. PETERSON                          |   |
|------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | Robert A. Peterson                              |
|                   |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |

 

**A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained bythe Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.**

----
#### Gabe ROBINSON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0899.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 23, 1993.

Charles E. Webster, Tollison Austin & Twiford, Clarksdale, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Ellen Y. Dale, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Appeal No. 7815 from Judgment dated Aug. 5, 1991, Joseph C. Webster, Ruling Judge, Coahoma County Circuit Court.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and BANKS and ROBERT L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ.

Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15356-15357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1818]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 71; Windsor Locks, CT

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Economic and Industrial Development Commission of 
Windsor Locks, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 71, submitted an 
application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 71 to include a 
site in East Granby/Windsor, Connecticut, within the Hartford Customs 
and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 47-2011, filed 7/5/
2011);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (76 FR 40688-40689, 7/11/2011) and the application has 
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; 
and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 71 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.


[[Page 15357]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of February 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST:


Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6300 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 105 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 105

 Designating April 13, 2000, as a day of remembrance of the victims of 
                       the Katyn Forest massacre.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2000

 Mr. Abraham submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 Designating April 13, 2000, as a day of remembrance of the victims of 
                       the Katyn Forest massacre.

Whereas 60 years ago, the Katyn Forest crime was committed, resulting in the 
        death of 21,000 Polish military officers of all armed services, and 
        justice and administration personnel;
Whereas, on the occasion of 60th anniversary of the Katyn crime, the Lower 
        Chamber of the Polish Parliament (Sejm) will pay homage to all those 
        murdered--the ``best sons of the nation'', those who had not given in to 
        Soviet ideology and physical pressure, and remained loyal to the 
        Republic of Poland and the values they were taught to uphold;
Whereas Congress joins the Sejm in condemning all forms of genocide, murder, 
        deportation, and violation of human rights;
Whereas Congress joins the Sejm in its appreciation to all scholars, 
        researchers, and writers, especially those under Soviet domination, who 
        had the courage to tell the truth about the Katyn crime;
Whereas Congress acknowledges with gratitude the Sejm's recognition of the 
        pioneering work of Congress and the House of Representatives for the 
        establishment in 1951 of a Select Committee to conduct an investigation 
        of the Katyn crime;
Whereas Congress is pleased to join the Sejm in thanking those citizens of 
        Russia who, guided by their sense of honor and dignity, contributed to 
        the disclosure of the basic Katyn crime and the confirming, related 
        documents; and
Whereas Congress continues to recognize the importance of remembering the 
        victims of communism as when it passed H.R. 3000 in 1993 calling for a 
        Victims of Communism Memorial, and commends the work of the Victims of 
        Communism Memorial Foundation in working toward this objective: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress joins the Polish Sejm in designating April 13, 2000, as a 
day of remembrance to the victims of the Katyn Massacre that occurred 
60 years ago and urges citizens of the United States to join their 
Polish counterparts in learning about and understanding what happened 
in the Katyn Forest.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, August 8, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00673

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF K .G.S. AND T.W.S., CH ILDREN , Appellant

On Appeal from the 312th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 01569



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due July 23, 2012 , 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On August 2, 2012, this court granted the court reporters request for extension of time to file the record until Aug ust 13, 2012. To date, the record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record will not be filed within the time prescribed in the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issue s the following order.

We order Ramona Gonzale z , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before August 23, 2012

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances . The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appe llate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). IfRamona Gonzalez does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an

order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure
to file the reco rd.

PER CURIAM
#### HOSPITAL SHARED SERVICES OF COLORADO, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Mike Baca, Commissioner, Gary R. Rose, Commissioner, John J. McDonald, Commissioner, and Mary Ann Dunlap, Claimant, Respondents.

No. 83CA0716.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. II.

Jan. 26, 1984.

*448George G. Johnson, Jr., Denver, for petitioner.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Timothy Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondents Industrial Com’n, Mike Baca, Gary R. Rose, and John J. McDonald.

Robert L. Harris, Denver, for respondent Mary Ann Dunlap.

BABCOCK, Judge.

Hospital Shared Services of Colorado (employer) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission awarding full unemployment compensation benefits to claimant. We affirm.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a night security guard when she was found sleeping on duty. She had been disciplined for the same offense a few months before. At the hearing before the referee, the employer’s representative testified that the employer’s policy provided for a three-step disciplinary procedure: a verbal warning for a first offense; a written warning for a second offense; and discharge for a third offense. It was undisputed that claimant’s discharge was brought about by her second offense and not her third.

The referee found that claimant had been discharged for a second offense of sleeping on the job and ordered a maximum reduction in benefits pursuant to § 8-73-108(9)(a)(XX), C.R.S. (1983 Cum.Supp.). The Industrial Commission reversed, finding that, although claimant had violated the employer’s rule against sleeping on the job, she had not been given the benefit of the employer’s stated disciplinary procedure. The Commission concluded that claimant was discharged through no fault of her own and awarded full benefits pursuant to § 8-73-108(4), C.R.S. (1983 Cum.Supp.).

The employer now contends that the provisions of § 8-73-108(9)(a)(XX) are mandatory where there has been a factual finding that a claimant was sleeping on the job, and, therefore, the Commission exceeded its authority by awarding claimant benefits. It further contends that there is insufficient evidence to support the findings of the Commission. Its contentions are without merit.

Here, the employer’s own evidence established that it had discharged defendant in violation of its stated policy, *see Shumate v. State Personnel Board,*34 Colo.App. 393, 528 P.2d 404 (1974), and employer introduced no evidence to justify deviation from that policy in this case. This is sufficient to support the Commission’s determination that claimant was unemployed through no fault of her own and, thus, is entitled to benefits under the general provisions of § 8-73-108(4). *See Sims v. Industrial Commission,*627 P.2d 1107 (Colo.1981) (interpreting similar language in § 8-73-108(5)).

Order affirmed.

BERMAN and KELLY, JJ., concur.
#### FIDELITY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. James H. HAMMONS.

No. 87-CC-2153.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Hammons, James H.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of St. Tammany, City Court of Slidell, No. 8759; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW87 1276.

Denied.
#### Christian ARES, Appellant, v. CORPORACION DE EURO COMERCIO EXTERIOR SOCIEDAD ANONIMA, Appellee.

Nos. 86-2279, 86-2755.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

Myra Bennett Torres, Miami, for appellant.

Harper & Hewitt; James C. Blecke and Susan S. Lerner, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *State v. Chillingworth,*126 Fla. 645, 171 So. 649 (1937); *Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., v. Huff,*499 So.2d 2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
S. Con. Res. 114 Agreed to October 24, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas over 4 million Americans served in World War I, however,

there is no nationally recognized symbol honoring the service

of such Americans;

Whereas in 1919, citizens of Kansas City expressed an outpouring of support, raising over $2,000,000 in 2 weeks, which was a

fundraising accomplishment unparalleled by any other city in

the United States irrespective of population;

Whereas on November 1, 1921, the monument site was dedicated

marking the only time in history that the 5 Allied military leaders

(Lieutenant General Baron Jacques of Belgium, General Armando

Diaz of Italy, Marshal Ferdinand Foch of France, General John

J. Pershing of the United States, and Admiral Lord Earl Beatty

of Great Britain) were together at one place;

Whereas during a solemn ceremony on Armistice Day in 1924,

President Calvin Coolidge marked the beginning of a 3-year

construction project by the laying of the cornerstone of the Liberty

Memorial;

Whereas the 217-foot Memorial Tower topped with 4 stone

‘‘Guardian Spirits’’ representing courage, honor, patriotism, and

sacrifice, rises above the observation deck, making the Liberty

Memorial a noble tribute to all who served;

Whereas during a rededication of the Liberty Memorial in 1961,

former Presidents Harry S Truman and Dwight D. Eisenhower

recognized the memorial as a constant reminder of the sacrifices

during World War I and the progress that followed;

Whereas the Liberty Memorial is the only public museum in the

United States specifically dedicated to the history of World War

I; and
S. Con. Res. 114—2

Whereas the Liberty Memorial is internationally known as a major

center of World War I remembrance: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the Liberty Memorial in Kansas City, Missouri, is recognized as a national World War I symbol, honoring those who defended liberty and our country through service in World War I.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Ley, Aloha (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Stephen Clark <retiredclark@yahoo.com> 

Sunday, June 24, 2012 3:04 PM 

Ley, Aloha (OSn 

Why A Grant? 

2PfZ 

Perhaps I don't grasp the concept involved for private sector businesses trying to get RDM to LAX air 

service. If this looked like a viable link that would run at a profit it would seem tha~airF!les would decide_ to 

provide the service. Since that has not happened, and other links from RDM have been dropped over time due 

to insufficient revenues, it makes no sense to me to use my tax dollars to II ... help less populated areas 

strengthen air service. II If local businesses want to lobby for this service let them do it with their own money, 

not mine. ·· · 

Regards, 

Stephen Clark 

Taxpayer 

Bend, Oregon 

1 

.. ··-. 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2178 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2178

        To extend the suspension of duty on tetraethylammonium 
                        perfluoroctanesulfonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the suspension of duty on tetraethylammonium 
                        perfluoroctanesulfonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRAETHYLAMMONIUM PERFLUOR-
              OCTANESULFONATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to tetraethylammonium 
perfluoroctanesulfonate) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Elizabeth M. McDonnell, Appellant, *v.*William A. Prendergast, as Comptroller of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

*People ex rel. McDonnell*v. *Prendergast,*167 App. Div. 140, affirmed.

(Argued January 3, 1916;

decided January 18, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 23, 1915, which reversed an order of Special Term *605granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to pay the relator’s salary as stenographer in the office of the public administrator of the county of Bronx for the- month of November, 1914. Defendants contended that the law does not provide for the appointment of a clerical staff in the office of public administrator of Bronx county and that the appointment of the relator was, therefore, void.

*Ernest E. L. Hammer, Joseph H. Fargis*and *Francis X. Goette*for appellant.

*Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel.(Terence Farley*and *Charles J. Nehrbas*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fund.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory Webster, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fund.com Inc. and will be retained by Fund.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 /s/  Gregory WebsterGregory WebsterChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 May 24, 2010
#### Joanne VIDALES and Harold Vidales, her husband, Appellants, v. Ira BAUM, D.P.M., Appellee.

No. 87-1726.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 16, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 21, 1988.

*310Ralph P. Ezzo, Miami, for appellants.

Womack, Lombana & Bass, P.A., and Judith A. Bass, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *Pearlstein v. Malunney,*500 So.2d 585 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), *rev. denied,*511 So.2d 299 (Fla.1987).