alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHYSICIANS FOR INTEGRITY IN

MEDICAL RESEARCH, INC.,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner

of Food and Drug Administration,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56119

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-08334-GAFFMO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 13, 2014

Pasadena, California

Before: FARRIS, N.R. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

The district court correctly dismissed Physicians for Integrity in Medical

Research, Inc.’s (“PIMR”) complaint with prejudice for lack of standing. For an

association like PIMR to have standing to sue on behalf of its members, the

FILED

FEB 24 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Page 2 of 3

members must “otherwise have standing to sue in their own right.” Friends of the

Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 181 (2000). Dr.

Steve Gupta, the only member of PIMR that the complaint alleges has standing,

would not have standing to bring this action in his own right.

We assume for purposes of argument that Dr. Gupta’s alleged injuries are

sufficiently “concrete and particularized” and “actual or imminent,” as opposed to

“conjectural or hypothetical,” to support standing. NRDC v. EPA, 735 F.3d 873,

878 (9th Cir. 2013). Dr. Gupta’s first alleged injury, for uncompensated time spent

counseling patients about Alair, is not fairly traceable to the challenged FDA

action. Id. As Dr. Gupta acknowledges in his opening brief on appeal, whether he

is compensated for time spent counseling patients is a function of the

reimbursement schedule for office visits set by other components of the federal

government, not by the FDA.

The second and third alleged injuries, for lost patients and loss of credibility,

will occur only if one of Dr. Gupta’s patients makes an independent choice—either

to find another physician or to view Dr. Gupta less favorably as a result of his

advice about Alair. Because Dr. Gupta’s theory of standing with respect to these

injuries “rest[s] on speculation about the decisions of independent actors,” the
Page 3 of 3

injuries are not fairly traceable to the FDA. Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, 133 S.

Ct. 1138, 1148–50 (2013). 

PIMR’s motion for supplemental briefing, filed on February 19, 2014, is

denied.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. KotekName: Freddie M. KotekTitle: Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: May 17, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 10 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 10

   Expressing the sense of Congress that there should continue to be 
 parity between the adjustments in the compensation of members of the 
uniformed services and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian 
                    employees of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 12, 1999

 Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Cleland) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress that there should continue to be 
 parity between the adjustments in the compensation of members of the 
uniformed services and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian 
                    employees of the United States.

Whereas members of the uniformed services of the United States and civilian 
        employees of the United States make significant contributions to the 
        general welfare of the United States;
Whereas, increases in the levels of pay of members of the uniformed services and 
        of civilian employees of the United States have not kept pace with 
        increases in the overall levels of pay of workers in the private sector 
        so that there is now up to a 30 percent gap between the compensation 
        levels of Federal civilian employees and the compensation levels of 
        private sector workers and a 9 to 14 percent gap between the 
        compensation levels of members of the uniformed services and the 
        compensation levels of private sector workers; and
Whereas, in almost every year of the past two decades, there have been equal 
        adjustments in the compensation of members of the uniformed services and 
        the compensation of civilian employees of the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that there should continue to be 
parity between the adjustments in the compensation of members of the 
uniformed services and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian 
employees of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Reader’s Guide for Aldicarb

CRM: Susan Bartow

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Aldicarb Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0161

Publication Date: June 27, 2012

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and navigate the various entries cont ained in the aldicarb docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened

for Review and Comment and Other Docket Actions.

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Aldi carb Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0161.

Docket Item 3. Aldicarb Preliminary Work Plan Re gistration Review: Initial Docket

Case Number 0140. June 2012.

Human Health Documents fo r Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Aldicarb. Human Health Assessmen t Scoping Document in Support of Registration Review. May 16, 2012.

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of work necessary to support the registration review of aldicarb.

Docket Item 5. Aldicarb: Review of Human Incidents. March 14, 2012.

This report represents human health incident s occurring in the United States for the single chemical, aldicarb, only.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. EFED Registration Review Probl em Formulation for Aldicarb

. May 24,

2012.

This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and characterizing the ecological risks.Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 7. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registration Review: Aldicarb (098301)

. December 8, 2011.

This document provides usage information and an overview of the pest management role of

aldicarb.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Fu Xu, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Fu XuFu XuChief Accounting OfficerDated: July 18, 2008
|----------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adrian Kowalewski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /S/    ADRIAN
KOWALEWSKI                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Adrian Kowalewski Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the transition report of Enterasys Networks, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the transition period ended December 29, 2001 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, William K. O'Brien, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ William K. O'Brien
----------------------------
William K. O'Brien
Chief Executive Officer
November 25, 2002
# Publicatieblad C 296A/3 au

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 296A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 65e jaargang3 augustus 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 296A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

65e jaargang3 augustus 2022

---

| Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Bekendmakingen |
| | BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES |
| | Gemeenschappelijke Onderneming Fusion for Energy |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Aankondiging tot wijziging van de aankondiging van Europese gemeenschappelijke onderneming voor ITER en de ontwikkeling van fusie-energie (F4E) — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van directeur (Tijdelijk functionaris — graad AD 14) — COM/2022/20086 ( PB C 285 A van 26.7.2022 ) | 1 |

Inhoud

Bladzijde

V   Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Gemeenschappelijke Onderneming Fusion for Energy

2022/C 296 A/01

Aankondiging tot wijziging van de aankondiging van Europese gemeenschappelijke onderneming voor ITER en de ontwikkeling van fusie-energie (F4E) — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van directeur (Tijdelijk functionaris — graad AD 14) — COM/2022/20086 ( PB C 285 A van 26.7.2022 )

( PB C 285 A van 26.7.2022 )

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

V Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Gemeenschappelijke Onderneming Fusion for Energy

| 3.8.2022 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 296/1

---

Aankondiging tot wijziging van de aankondiging van Europese gemeenschappelijke onderneming voor ITER en de ontwikkeling van fusie-energie (F4E) — Bekendmaking van een vacature voor de functie van directeur (Tijdelijk functionaris — graad AD 14) — COM/2022/20086

(
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 285 A van 26 juli 2022
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

Bladzijde 5, “Arbeidsvoorwaarden”, zesde alinea:

| in plaats van: | “De functie komt vrij op 1 januari 2024.”, |
| --- | --- |

in plaats van:

“De functie komt vrij op 1 januari 2024.”,

| lezen: | “De functie komt vrij op 1 januari 2023.”. |
| --- | --- |

lezen:

lezen:

“De functie komt vrij op 1 januari 2023.”.

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles GERVAIS.

No. 88-K-2518.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Gervais, Charles; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KA-0118; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 87-2022.

*1252Prior report: La.App., 531 So.2d 555.

Denied.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EDWARD BERNARD HILLS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-2162

March 27, 2024

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Edward Bernard Hills, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and BLACK and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1993
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1993
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1993
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         420,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 420,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     420,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   420,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
50315.

#### HILTON v. THE STATE.

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, in three separate indictments relating to three different automobiles was charged in each with the offense of motor vehicle theft and theft by receiving stolen property. He was convicted for receiving stolen property in all three indictments. He was given 7 years in each case to run concurrently. On his appeal to this court he seeks reversal on the grounds of insufficiency of evidence, the giving of a charge relating to possession of stolen property, and the failure to give a requested *charge.Held:*

1. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction.

2. The trial judge charged the jury as follows: "I further charge you that you would be authorized to convict the defendant if you should find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had actual or constructive possession either or jointly with others.

"I charge you that if the crime of auto theft or crimes of auto theft should have been committed as charged on these indictments and certain personal property or automobile as set forth in the indictment was stolen as a result of such crime, and if presently thereafter the defendant shall be found in possession of the stolen property or any of the stolen property, that would be a circumstance, along with all the other evidence adduced, from which the jury may infer guilt, unless, of course, the defendant should make an explanation of his possession of the stolen property consistent with the plea of innocence which again, is a question for you, the jury, to determine.”

*591Submitted March 10, 1975

Decided April 7, 1975

Rehearing denied April 22, 1975.

*Horton J. Greene,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carole E. Wall, Donald G. Frost, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

In view of the decisions of this court in *Bird v. State,*72 Ga. App. 843 (4) (35 SE2d 483); *Higginbotham v. State,*124 Ga. App. 489 (3) (184 SE2d 231); *Gaskin v. State,*119 Ga. App. 593, 594 (168 SE2d 183), and other cases, this charge is error as unexplained possession of recently stolen goods standing alone will not support the inference of guilty knowledge or authorize a conviction of theft by receiving stolen property, though it would as to the charge of direct theft of the automobiles.

3. The request to charge, on this same subject matter contained inappropriate language and there was no error in refusing to give the charge requested.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3342-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for State of Connecticut (FEMA-3342-EM), dated October 31, 2011, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         February 29, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

This action terminates the appointment of Stephen M. DeBlasio Sr. as Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2012-6357 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### African Development Foundation

      ( print page 16802)    

# Time:

 Thursday, April 12, 2012, 8:45 a.m. to 1 p.m.

# Place:

 African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I Street NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.

# Date:

 Thursday, April 12, 2012.

# Status:

                        1. Open session, Thursday, April 12, 2012,                         *8:45 a.m. to 11:45 a.m.;*                         and                    

                        2. Closed session, Thursday, April 12, 2012,                         *12 p.m. to 1 p.m.*

                        Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Sarah Conway at (202) 233-8811 or                         *sconway@usadf.gov*                         of your request to attend by 5 p.m. on Thursday, April 5, 2012.                    

Lloyd O. Pierson,

President & CEO, USADF.

[FR Doc. 2012-6920 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P