alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, RICK M. STREET,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      November 9, 2007




By:
              /s/
                  Rick M. StreetRick
                  M. Street
#### Carl E. MOSS v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57706.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 27, 1988.

Clarence A. Whitaker, Vicksburg, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman and Mike Moore, Attys. Gen., by Billy L. Gore, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Warren County; John E. Ellis, Judge.

*1031Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and SULLIVAN and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### H.A. DICKSON v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 58315.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1989.

Davey L. Tucker, Jackson, for appellant.

Mildred M. Morris, Steen, Reynolds, Dalehite & Currie, Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; L. Breland Hilbum, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### Gerald B. PURVIS, Shereen S. Purvis, Joe F. Slade, Jr., and Brenda K. Slade v. AMERICAN MOTORS CORPORATION, Jeep Corporation, Tangipahoa Parish Police Jury, Thomas Brunet, Debbie Brunet and Sentry Insurance a Mutual Company.

No. 89-C-0696.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re American Motors Corp.; Jeep Corporation; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA88 0273; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 71283.

Prior report: La.App. 538 So.2d 1015.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and MARCUS, J., would grant on the product issue.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40899 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUANA FORTUNA-TURBIARTES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-133-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juana Fortuna-Turbiartes appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Fortuna-Turbiartes contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. She therefore argues that her conviction must be reduced to one under the lesser included offense found in 8 U.S.C. § 1362(a), her judgment must be reformed to reflect aNo. 03-40899 -2- conviction only under that provision, and her sentence must be vacated and the case remanded for resentencing to no more than two years’ imprisonment and one year of supervised release.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Fortuna-Turbiartes acknowledges that her arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). She seeks to preserve her arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### John R. and Audrey PERTUIT v. AMERICAN BANK.

No. 87-C-6.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 9, 1987.

Writ Denied March 26, 1987.

*155Shushan, Meyer, Jackson, McPherson & Herzog, Rader Jackson, New Orleans, for relator.

R.O. Lewis, P.C., Luling, for respondent.

Before CHEHARDY, GAUDIN and WICKER, JJ.

CHEHARDY, Chief Judge.

Relator seeks supervisory relief from a denial of its motion for summary judgment in relator’s suit to enforce a judgment against community property. The narrow issue presented is whether *Kirchberg v. Feenstra,*609 F.2d 727 (5th Cir.1979), affirmed, 450 U.S. 455, 101 S.Ct. 1195, 67 L.Ed.2d 428 (1981), applies to this case to preclude enforcement of the judgment against the wife’s half of the community property.

The *Kirchberg*decision, which struck down the provision of the Louisiana Civil Code designating the husband as head and master of the community and which gave the husband the exclusive right to administer the community estate, was rendered on December 12, 1979. Relator’s judgment was obtained on November 12, 1979 and was obtained upon default of a promissory note secured by a mortgage on community property. The note and mortgage were executed solely by the husband some years prior to 1979.

After our review, we find the *Kirchberg*court did not intend its decision to apply to notes and mortgages executed prior to its decision since the court specifically stated that it was to be applied prospectively. See also *Ailstock v. Hamiter,*420 So.2d 500 (La.App. 2d Cir.1982). Consequently we find *Kirchberg*does not apply to these facts and relator is entitled to enforce its judgment against both the husband and wife’s half of the community property.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court denying relator’s motion for summary judgment is hereby reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

REVERSE AND REMANDED.
#### Harry D. HOSKINS, III v. Charles W. ZIEGLER, III.

No. 87-C-1489.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Hoskins, Harry D. Ill; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-6507; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “D”, No. 85-6543.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 146.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eddie and Jeanmarie BOOKER.

No. 89-KK-0947.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 26, 1989.

In re Booker, Eddie; Booker, JeanMarie; —Defendants); applying for writ of certio-rari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 0380; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, Nos. 166878, 168661.

Granted. Sentence imposed on Mrs. Booker is reduced to six months in accord-*1390anee with La.Code Criminal Procedure art. 493.1. Otherwise denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

WATSON and COLE, JJ., would deny the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alexander L. TALBERT.

No. 89-KH-0008.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

In re Talbert, Alexander L.; — Defendants); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-8218; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 313-297.

*1244Denied. Moot. The orders of the Fourth Circuit have been complied with.
#### Bobby Joe TALLY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57244.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Oct. 7, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1987.

James C. Helveston, West Point, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen., by Deirdre D. McCrory, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Ernest L. Brown, Judge.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and ANDERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Cauzell B. CHENIER v. CLERK OF COURT, 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU, State of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-2659.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Chenier, Clauzell B.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ of mandamus; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 16164-84; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW87-1153.

Granted. Trial court ordered to furnish copy of *Boykin*exam.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. RES. 133

Supporting religious tolerance toward Muslims.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. ROBB, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr.

LIEBERMAN, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. FEINGOLD) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 20, 2000

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

JULY 27, 2000

Considered and agreed to

RESOLUTION

Supporting religious tolerance toward Muslims.

Whereas the American Muslim community, comprised of approximately 6,000,000 people, is a vital part of our Nation, with more than 1,500 mosques, Islamic schools, and

Islamic centers in neighborhoods across the United

States;

Whereas Islam is one of the great Abrahamic faiths, whose

significant contributions throughout history have advanced the fields of math, science, medicine, law, philosophy, art, and literature;
2

•SRES 133 ATS

Whereas the United States is a secular nation, with an unprecedented commitment to religious tolerance and pluralism, where the rights, liberties, and freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution are guaranteed to all citizens regardless of religious affiliation;

Whereas Muslims have been subjected, simply because of

their faith, to acts of discrimination and harassment that

all too often have led to hate-inspired violence, as was the

case during the rush to judgment in the aftermath of the

tragic Oklahoma City bombing;

Whereas discrimination against Muslims intimidates American Muslims and may prevent Muslims from freely expressing their opinions and exercising their religious beliefs as guaranteed by the first amendment to the Constitution;

Whereas American Muslims have regrettably been portrayed

in a negative light in some discussions of policy issues

such as issues relating to religious persecution abroad or

fighting terrorism in the United States;

Whereas stereotypes and anti-Muslim rhetoric have also contributed to a backlash against Muslims in some neighborhoods across the United States; and

Whereas all persons in the United States who espouse and

adhere to the values of the founders of our Nation should

help in the fight against bias, bigotry, and intolerance in

all their forms and from all their sources: Now, therefore,

be it

1 Resolved, That—

2 (1) the Senate condemns anti-Muslim intoler3 ance and discrimination as wholly inconsistent with
3

•SRES 133 ATS

1 the American values of religious tolerance and plu2 ralism;

3 (2) while the Senate respects and upholds the

4 right of individuals to free speech, the Senate ac5 knowledges that individuals and organizations that

6 foster such intolerance create an atmosphere of ha7 tred and fear that divides the Nation;

8 (3) the Senate resolves to uphold a level of po9 litical discourse that does not involve making a

10 scapegoat of an entire religion or drawing political

11 conclusions on the basis of religious doctrine; and

12 (4) the Senate recognizes the contributions of

13 American Muslims, who are followers of one of the

14 three major monotheistic religions of the world and

15 one of the fastest growing faiths in the United

16 States.

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF ENTERASYS NETWORKS, INC.
Enterasys Holdings Limited (Mauritius)
Enterasys India Pvt. Ltd. (India)
Enterasys Networks Distribution Limited (Ireland)
Enterasys Networks Chile (Chile)
Enterasys Networks de Argentina (Argentina)
Enterasys Networks de Colombia Ltda (Colombia)
Enterasys Networks de Venezuela, C.A.(Venezuela)
Enterasys Networks, A.B. (Sweden)
Enterasys Networks, Pte Ltd (Korea)
Enterasys Networks, S.A. (France)
Enterasys Networks, Sdn Bhd. (Malaysia)
Enterasys Networks A.G. (Switzerland)
Enterasys Networks Acquisition, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks do Brasil (Brazil)
Enterasys Networks Government Sales, Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks Handels GmbH (Austria)
Enterasys Networks Limited (Bermuda)
Enterasys Networks N.V. (Belguim)
Enterasys Networks Netherlands, B.V. (Netherlands)
Enterasys Networks of Canada Limited/Reseaux Enterasys du Canada Limitee
  (Canada)
Enterasys Networks Sales & Service Inc. (Delaware)
Enterasys Networks U.K., Ltd. (UK)
Enterasys Networks, GmbH (Germany)
Enterasys Networks, K.K. (Japan)
Enterasys Networks, Pty. Limited (Australia)
Enterasys Networks, S.A. (Spain)
Enterasys Networks S.a.r.l. (Luxembourg)
Enterasys Networks Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
Enterasys Networks, S.r.l. (Italy)
Enterasys Networks, Singapore Pte Ltd. (Singapore)
GlobalNetwork Technology Services, Inc. (Delaware)
#### Patricia C. DEYOUNG, as Personal Representative of the Estate of William G. Deyoung, Deceased, Appellant, v. James L. BIERFELD, M.D. and James L. Bierfeld, M.D., P.A., Appellees.

Nos. 87-1600, 87-2080.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 22, 1988.

Stanley M. Rosenblatt and Laura S. Rot-stein and Judith Hayes, for appellant.

Stephens, Lynn, Klein & McNicholas and Debra J. Snow and Robert M. Klein, and Magill & Lewis and R. Fred Lewis, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment in favor of the defendants in a medical malpractice action as barred by limitations *934because claimant’s former attorney’s affidavit created disputed questions of fact which should have been resolved in an evi-dentiary hearing as to whether claimant unreasonably failed to comply with formal discovery as required by sections 768.-57(3)(a) and 768.57(6), Florida Statutes (1985). *See Pinellas Emergency Mental Health Serv., Inc. v. Richardson,*532 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Reversed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13050 and #13051]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated 03/16/2012. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         02/29/2012 through 03/03/2012.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         03/16/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/15/2012. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/17/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/16/2012, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Grant, Laurel, Lawrence, Magoffin, Martin, Menifee, Morgan. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13050C and for economic injury is 13051C. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2012-7109 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Thomas Carey SMITH v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 58572.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

May 31, 1989.

Dale H. McDavitt, McComb, for appellant.

Mike Moore, Atty. Gen. by John R. Henry, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pike County; Joe N. Pigott, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and ROBERTSON and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, ANDERSON, PITTMAN and BLASS, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                     |                               |
|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                              |                                          |
|                         |                                |                          |
| **May                  15, 2006** | By:                            | /s/ Bruce                Hahn |
|                              | **Bruce                Hahn**            |
|                              | Chief                  Executive Officer |

|         |                                                              |                                   |
|--------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|         |                                                              |
|    |                                                         |                              |
|         | By:                                                          | /s/ Bruce                  Layman |
|         | **Bruce                  Layman**                                 |
|         | Chief                      Financial                      Officer |
S. J. Res. 43

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Expressing the sense of Congress that the President of the United States should

encourage free and fair elections and respect for democracy in Peru.

Whereas presidential and congressional elections are scheduled to

occur in Peru on April 9, 2000;

Whereas independent election monitors, including the Organization

of American States, the National Democratic Institute, and the

Carter Center, have expressed grave doubts about the fairness

of the electoral process due to the Peruvian Government’s control

of key official electoral agencies, systematic restrictions on

freedom of the press, manipulation of the judicial processes to

stifle independent reporting on radio, television, and newspaper

outlets, and harassment and intimidation of opposition politicians,

which have greatly limited the ability of opposing candidates

to campaign freely; and

Whereas the absence of free and fair elections in Peru would constitute a major setback for the Peruvian people and for democracy

in the hemisphere, could result in instability in Peru, and could

jeopardize United States antinarcotics objectives in Peru and

the region: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That it is the

sense of Congress that the President of the United States should

promptly convey to the President of Peru that if the April 9,

2000, elections are not deemed by the international community

to have been free and fair, the United States will review and

modify as appropriate its political, economic, and military relations
S. J. Res. 43—2

with Peru, and will work with other democracies in this hemisphere

and elsewhere toward a restoration of democracy in Peru.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.