alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 6, 2015

Mr. David Simmons

14806 Adios

San Antonio

, TX 78248

Dear Mr. Simmons :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA− 2015

− 1434 ) on

May 11, 2015 , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you

sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemptio n.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3

Project No.: AXX

- xx

- xxx

- E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM

- 104:TAdams:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM

- 1/100/104:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[ Insert Stylewriter Score Here ]

MR DAVID SIMMONS

14806 ADIOS

SAN ANTONIO TX 78248
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         826
<SECURITIES>                                   647,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               648,614
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 648,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,715
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       345,350
<OTHER-SE>                                     299,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   648,614
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               44,044
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,544
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            128,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   128,616
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .023
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .023
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                    SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

           CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, FORMER INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-73211), Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-72829),
Registration Statement (Form S-2, No. 333-64975) and Registration Statement
(Form S-2, No. 333-35045) of our report dated March 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sunrise Technologies
International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
June 1, 1999
#### Elizabeth A. MOHR v. Edward G. BROUSSARD, et al.

No. 88-C-0113.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 12, 1988.

In re Mohr, Elizabeth A.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-3446; Parish of Plaquemines, 25th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 23-412.

Prior report: La.App., 515 So.2d 833.

Granted.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED E RIC J. JOHNSON , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 23

- 504 LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 8507 STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. _______________________________/ Decision filed February 28, 2023 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County , R. Anthony Salem , Judge. Eric J

. Johnson, O keechobee, p ro s e. No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

W ALLIS , HARRIS and MACIVER , JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      23.2


CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Presstek,
        Inc.
 Hudson,
        New Hampshire
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the respective Registration
        Statements on Forms S-8 (Nos. 033-80466, 033-61215, 033-30337, 333-76905
        and
        333-97897) and on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-02299 and 33-48342) of Presstek, Inc.,
        and
        in the Prospectuses constituting part of such Registration Statements, of
        our
        report dated March 16, 2006, except for the effects of the discontinued
        operations as to which the date is April 24, 2007, relating to the consolidated
        financial statements of Presstek, Inc. as of and for the years ended December
        31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/
        BDO
        Seidman, LLP
 
 Boston,
        Massachusetts
 April
        24,
        2007
#### Gloria Jean ROBINSON v. Richard SANDERS.

87-684.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 29, 1988.

Katheree Hughes, Jr., Birmingham, for appellant.

M. Wayne Wheeler, Birmingham, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because the appellant’s “issue presented” and “argument” on appeal are limited to her amended counterclaim for the imposition of a constructive trust, the summary judgment in favor of the appellee, based on the 10-year statute of limitations applicable to this remedy for recovery of land, is affirmed on the authority of Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-33; and *Haavik v. Famell,*264 Ala. 326, 87 So.2d 629 (1956).

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C.J., and JONES, SHORES, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 18

- 00004

- CV

PEREGRINE OIL & GAS II, LLC , Appellant
V.
JAB ENERGY SOLUTIONS II, LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015

- 35327

MEMORANDUM OPINION Both parties appealed from a judgment signed October 5, 2017. On March 5, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss both appeal s and release the supersedeas bond posted on behalf of appellant Peregrine Oil & Gas II, LLC

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We grant the motion to dismiss.Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
49318.

#### LUXUREST FURNITURE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FURNITURE WAREHOUSE SALES, INC. et al.

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court in this case on certiorari *(Gurwitch v. Luxurest Furniture Mfg. Co.,*233 Ga. 934) the judgment of reversal entered by this court *(Luxurest Furniture Mfg. Co. v. Furniture Warehouse Sales, Inc.,*132 Ga. App. 661, 209 SE2d 63) is hereby vacated and a judgment of affirmance of the trial court is hereby entered.

*529Decided April 9, 1975.

*Lazarus, Stokes & Kaplan, Marion B. Stokes, John H. Watson,*for appellant.

*Nall, Miller & Cadhenhead, Gerald A. Friedlander, James C. Pratt,*for appellees.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Quillian and Webb, JJ., concur.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARK STEPHEN PAYNE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-90-73-R, CA-97-77-R)

Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: March 12, 1998

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Stephen Payne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Payne, Nos. CR-90-73-R; CA-97-77-R (W.D.

Va. Feb. 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 34 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. J. RES. 34

      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 23 (legislative day, September 22), 1999

  Ms. Snowe introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      Congratulating and commending the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Whereas the organization now known as the Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United 
        States was founded in Columbus, Ohio, on September 29, 1899;
Whereas the VFW represents approximately 2,000,000 veterans of the Armed Forces 
        who served overseas in World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the 
        Persian Gulf War, and Bosnia; and
Whereas the VFW has, for the past 100 years, provided voluntary and unselfish 
        service to the Armed Forces and to veterans, communities, States, and 
        the Nation and has worked toward the betterment of veterans in general 
        and society as a whole: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 100th 
        anniversary of the founding of the Veterans of Foreign Wars of 
        the United States (the VFW);
            (2) congratulates the VFW on achieving that milestone;
            (3) commends the approximately 2,000,000 veterans who 
        belong to the VFW and thanks them for their service to their 
        fellow veterans and the Nation; and
            (4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation 
        recognizing the anniversary of the VFW and the contributions 
        made by the VFW to veterans and the Nation and calling upon the 
        people of the United States to observe such anniversary with 
        appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer ofWII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2008 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.  This certification is providedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) ofItem 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

| **Date: November 14, 2008** | ** ** | ** **                     |
|----------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|
|                             |       | /s/ John Fitzpatrick           |
|                             |       | Name: John Fitzpatrick         |
|                             |       | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Steve Bajic, President, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Goldrange Resources, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Goldrange Resources, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date:  November 8, 2006

 

/s/ Steve Bajic                                                                

Steve Bajic

President, Secretary, Treasurer 

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial 

Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

CW901811.1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-50847

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERARDO LOPEZ-LUEBANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-95-CR-229-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

May 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerardo Lopez-Luebano appeals his jury convictions for

possession with intent to distribute marijuana and the

importation of marijuana. He contends that the evidence was

insufficient to prove that he knew that there was marijuana

hidden in the tires of the truck that he was driving. We have

reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that

the evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find LopezLuebano guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Diaz-
No. 95-50847

- 2 -

Carreon, 915 F.2d 951, 953 (5th Cir. 1990) (possession with

intent to distribute narcotics); United States v. Ojebode, 957

F.2d 1218, 1223 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 1291

(1993) (importation of narcotics).

Lopez-Luebano also contends that the district court abused

its discretion when it refused to instruct the jury that his

nervousness alone was insufficient to support a finding of guilty

knowledge. The requested instruction did not concern an

important point in the trial such that its omission seriously

impaired the appellant's ability to present a given defense

effectively. United States v. Chaney, 964 F.2d 437, 444 (5th

Cir. 1992).

AFFIRMED.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 152

To make a technical correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 4868.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. ROTH submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To make a technical correction in the enrollment of the

bill H.R. 4868.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in the enrollment of the bill (H.R.

3 4868) to amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the

4 United States to modify temporarily certain rates of duty,

5 to make other technical amendments to the trade laws,

6 and for other purposes, the Clerk of the House of Rep7 resentatives shall make the following correction:

8 On page 160, line 8, strike ‘‘: and’’ and all that fol9 lows through line 10, and insert a period.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S.J. Res. 55 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. J. RES. 55

      To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 24 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mr. Lott introduced the following joint resolution; which was read 
           twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
      To change the date for counting the electoral votes in 2001.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the Senate and House of 
Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives 
at the hour of 1 o'clock in the afternoon on the 5th day of January, 
2001, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer. 
Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and 
two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be 
handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the 
certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral 
votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and 
acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the 
letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence 
and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they 
shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been 
ascertained and counted in the manner and according to the rules by law 
provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of 
the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which 
announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, 
if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, 
together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the 
two Houses.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                         CERTIFICATION OF 10-KSB REPORT
                                       OF
                          ZYNEX MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.
                      FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004

     1.  The undersigned is the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal
         Financial Officer of Zynex Medical Holdings, Inc. ("Zynex"). This
         Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
         of 2002. This Certification accompanies the 10-KSB Report of Zynex for
         the year ended December 31, 2004.

     2.  We certify that such 10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
         that the information contained in such 10-KSB Report fairly presents,
         in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of Zynex.

This Certification is executed as of April 15, 2005.


                                           /s/  Thomas Sandgaard
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Thomas Sandgaard
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer and
                                           Principal Financial Officer)