alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-63020, No. 333-113834 and No. 333-38765),
Registration Statements on Form S-4 (No. 333-111742, No. 333-38759, and No.
333-70522), and on Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-112107, No.
333-71063, and No. 333-44742) of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March
6, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
March 6, 2005
```
Exhibit 32.2



|             |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------------ |  | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2 |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the Form 10-Q/A) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q/A fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 11, 2009
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ RANDALL T. MAYS    
|Name:                   |  | Randall T. Mays        
|Title:                  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wayne SHOWS.

No. 87-K-1536.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18584-KA; Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 84-121A.

Prior report: La.App., 508 So.2d 991.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Rodney MACON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-1778.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Macon, Rodney; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, habeas corpus, mandamus; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. *“C”,*No. 112549.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
23.1





INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Simtrol, Inc. on Form S-8 [File No. 333-148890] of our report, which includes an
explanatory paragraph as to the company’s ability to continue as a going
concern, dated March 26, 2010, with respect to our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Simtrol, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009
and 2008, and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simtrol, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.




Our
report on the consolidated financial statements refers to a change in method of
accounting for certain convertible debt and equity instruments effective January
1, 2009.





/s/
Marcum LLP





New York,
New York


March 26,
2010
#### STATE ex rel. Allen E. CHANCE v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0427.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 26, 1987.

In re Chance, Allen E.; Applying for Remedial Writs; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number K86-1203; Parish of Sabine 11th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.

LEMMON, J.,

concurs. The appellate court’s procedure for compelling compliance with court rules and for requiring complete applications by penitentiary inmates is generally reasonable. The Court pointed out the applicable court rule and listed the items necessary to complete the application. Although the period allowed for supplementation before dismissing the writ as not considered may be too short, relator may simply refile a new application and supply the previous deficiencies.
Revised CPMS language Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 11/15/2012 02:20 PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland, Kevin Culligan

Cortney --

Here is the revised CPMS language redlined against the version you now have.

Thanks.

CPMS language_redline_111512.docx

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30165 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ERIC D. JONES, also known as Lil E, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CF-10012-10

-------------------- October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Eric D. Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Jones has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a pro se brief of his own. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw isNo. 02-30165 -2- GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 of Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick MontalbanChief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer





November
16, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Gilberto BACALLAO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1503.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1987.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and N. Joseph Durant, Jr., Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Richard Kaplan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for ap-pellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Gilberto Bacallao’s convictions for two reasons. First, the curative instruction given by the court was entirely sufficient to cure any prejudice caused by the witness’s unsolicited comment indicating that he had been informed that Bacalloa was “a dangerous person.” *See Hellman v. State,*492 So.2d 1368 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); *cf. Staten v. State,*500 So.2d 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (detective’s uninvited comment that defendant had been arrested on an unrelated crime remedied by curative instruction); *Marshall v. State,*439 So.2d 973 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (curative instruction sufficient to dissipate any prejudicial effect caused by laboratory technician’s comment indicating that defendant had been arrested on a previous occasion). Second, the evidence pointing to the defendant’s guilt is so overwhelming that we may confortably conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that any error resulting from the comment was harmless. *See Michaels v. State,*505 So.2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); *Llida v. State,*501 So.2d 162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6770]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee (DPAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Deschutes Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on April 
4, 2012 to review the annual program of work, finalize key items for 
the fall field meetings, and listen to a presentation on the Deschutes 
County wetlands inventory. The meeting will also provide updates on the 
Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Act (CFLRA) and the 
sustainable recreation subcommittee. Members will meet at the Deschutes 
National Forest Supervisors office (63095 Deschutes Market Road, Bend, 
Oregon) from 9 a.m. until 1 p.m. All Deschutes Provincial Advisory 
Committee meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Keown, Province Liaison, 
Sisters Ranger District, Pine Street and Highway 20, Sisters, Oregon 
97759, Phone (541) 549-7735.

John Allen,
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2012-6770 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
#### TOWN OF HAMDEN ET AL. *v.*LEE S. BRADY ET AL.

*Lee S. Brady,*in support of the petition.

*Barbara G. Lifton,*in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17920) is denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2077 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hand blown glass vases. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on hand blown glass vases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HAND BLOWN GLASS VASES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Hand blown (but not mechanically pressed) glass 

vases, cut or engraved, valued 

at more than $5 each (provided for in subheading 

7013.99.70) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2077 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00383-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.L.R., a Child

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-01819

The Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. We order that no costs be assessed against appellant because he is indigent. 

SIGNED October 24, 2018.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 80

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, February 10, 2000,

4 or Friday, February 11, 2000, on a motion offered pursu5 ant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

6 or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon

7 on Tuesday, February 22, 2000, or until such time on that

8 day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his des9 ignee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon

10 on the second day after Members are notified to reassem11 ble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution,

12 whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns

13 on the legislative day of Wednesday, February 16, 2000,

14 Thursday, February 17, 2000, or Friday, February 18,

15 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent res16 olution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

17 adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 29,

18 2000, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the sec19 ond day after Members are notified to reassemble pursu-
2

SCON 80 ES

1 ant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

2 occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

4 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

5 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

6 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen7 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

8 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate February 10, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 80

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate and a conditional adjournment ofthe House of Representatives.
August 9, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF C.Y.C., A CHILD

NO. 14-11-00341-CV V.

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed January 27, 2011, was heard on 

the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the 

judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DEVORIS NEWSON,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00259

- CR

Appeal from the

120th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20110D01149)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We

further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
# L_2006054EN.01001701.xml

| 24.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 54/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 54/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 330/2006

of 23 February 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 17 to 23 February 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Treasury published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 9, 2012, inviting comments on a proposed and/or continuing information collection, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This document contained incorrect references.                    

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 9, 2011, in FR Doc. 2012-2980, make the following corrections:                    
      - Page 6858, in the third column, under SUMMARY                         :, replace “Alabama” with “New York”.                    
      - Page 6858, in the third column, under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORAMTION                         :,                          Title:                          replace “Alabama” with “New York”.                    
      - Page 6859, in the first column, fourth line of text beginning with “caused by”, replace “caused by severe storms, tornadoes, straight-line winds and flooding in Alabama beginning on April 15, 2011.” with “in the State of New York caused by either Hurricane Irene during the period of August 26, 2011, to September 5, 2011, or the remnants of Tropical Storm Lee during the period of September 7, 2011, to September 11, 2011.”
      - Page 6859, in the first column, under Estimated Number of Respondents:,                          replace “600” with “1,200”.                    
      - Page 6859, in the first column, under Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:,                          replace “150” with “300”.                    

Dated: March 20, 2012.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-7082 Filed 3-23-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Darryl J. CAVALIER v. David L. NELSON.

No. 88-C-3055.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Nelson, David L.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. CA88-0268; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 332-561.

Prior report: La.App., 532 So.2d 899.

Denied.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

November 1, 2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00853- CV

IN RE DIPAK T. PATEL AND PRAVIN T. PATEL , Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 344th District Court Chambers County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV25784



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 2, 2018, relator s Dipak T. Patel and Pravin T. Patel filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 ( West Supp.
2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this c ourt to compel the Honorable Randy McDonald , presiding judge of the 344th District Court of Chambers County , to vacate his September 27, 2018 order denying relators’ motion
to dismiss

.2

With certain exceptions, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal . In re Prudential Ins. Co

. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Relators have not shown that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. We therefore deny relators ’ petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.