SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: District Department of the Environment (DDOE)

Date Submitted: July 17

, 2014 Subject: 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory for the District of Co lumbia portion of the Washington DC

- MD

- VA

Nonattainment Area (DC Area) for the 2008 Ozone Standard

Completeness Review Completed by: Marilyn Powers Date Completed: September 25 , 2014

Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMIT TAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Submittal l etter dated July 17

, 2014 from DDOE Director

Keith A. to EPA Region al Administrator Shawn Garvin

. Submit tal letter was received on July 22 2014

. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. The base year emissions inventory was finalized as proposed on May 12, 2014 (no comments were received on the proposed inventory).

3. Evidence that t he State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. As stated in the submittal letter, DDOE has authority under

District of Columbia Air Pollution Control Act of 1984 as amended (DC Law 5

- 165; DC Official Code 8

- 1 01.01 et seq .), the DDOE Establishment Act of 2005, as amended (DC Law

16

- 51; DC Official Code 8

- 151.01 et seq. ), and Mayor’s orders

98

- 44, 98

- 45, and 2006

- 6. X4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for

approval and incorporation by ref erence into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating tha t it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. A c opy of the 2011 base year emissions i nventory for the

District of Columbia portion of the DC Area wa s included in

the submittal.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. The submittal letter and a memorandum da ted July 19, 2014 provide information that DDOE followed the District of Columbia laws and procedures. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of suc h notice. 6. The submittal includes a copy of the Metropolitan Council of Governments website page that makes the emissions inventory publicly available. The notice of the public hearing was published in the D. C. Register on April 11, 2014 (61 DCR

16: 0 03782, Notice ID 4842548) X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A memorandum dated July 19 , 2014 provides the Hearing
Officer’s Certification that the Public Hea ring was held on May 12, 2014 in accordance with the public notice. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. No comments were received. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTA L

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Section 1.1 of the 2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory

i ndicates that typical ozone season day emissions were developed for VOC, NOx, and CO. X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2

. The base year inventory affects the District of Columbia portion of the Washington DC n onattainment area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of ch anges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. Not applicable. X

4. The State's demonstration that the nation al ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. Not applicable. X

5. Modeling inf

ormation required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other in formation relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable.

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. Not applicable.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Not applicable. Xpractice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,

where necessary, to ensure emission levels.

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliance will be determin ed in practice. 8

. Not applicable. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. Not applicable.

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not applicable. X