alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P.
(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2464 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2464

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-hydroxyethyl-n-octyl sulfide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-HYDROXYETHYL-N-OCTYL SULFIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       2-Hydroxyethyl-n-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          octyl sulfide                                                      31/2011.......
                          (CAS No. 3547-33-
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2930.90.91)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**





**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the annual report on Form
      10-KSB of Simtrol, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof
      (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that (1) the Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.





This
      Certification is signed on April 17, 2007.




/s/ Richard
              W. EganRichard
              W. EganPresident
              and
              Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Stephen
                N. SampStephen
                N. SampChief
                Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2442 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain yard ornaments depicting school 

mascots. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain yard ornaments 

depicting school mascots. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN YARD ORNAMENTS DEPICTING 

4 SCHOOL MASCOTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2442 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Yard ornaments depicting 

school mascots, with silhouette heads, fabric body to 

catch wind with internal 

frame to maintain body shape 

in low winds, and spring steel 

stake system for wind induced movement (provided 

for in subheading 

6307.90.98) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

# AGENCY:

ITS Joint Program Office, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

# ACTION:

Notice.

                    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will hold a free public meeting on the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) research program on April 18, 2012, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. at ITS America, 1100 17th Street NW., Suite 1200, Washington DC 20036, 202-484-4847. The meeting will also be available by webinar. Persons planning to attend the workshop or participate in the webinar should register online no later than April 15, 2012 at                     *http://www.itsa.org/​v2i.*

This public meeting is being held in support of the V2I for Safety Program for Connected Vehicles Initiative lead by the ITS JPO. The meeting will allow primary stakeholders and subject matter experts to review concepts of how selected safety applications will work that involve infrastructure components. The outcome of this meeting will provide customer based feedback on how these safety applications can be developed to achieve maximum effectiveness while minimizing cost.

The purpose of the V2I program is to enable the development of vehicle based applications and safety systems that will assist drivers in avoiding crashes. As part of this program, FHWA's role is to develop roadside equipment and other enabling technologies that will enable these safety applications to function properly.

                    If you have any questions or you need any special accommodations, please send an email to Adam Hopps at                     *Ahopps@itsa.org.*

Issued in Washington, DC, on the 15th day of March 2012.

Shelley Row,

Director, ITS Joint Program Office.

[FR Doc. 2012-6775 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
#### Grant COX and Betty Cox, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Burton Archie GREEN and Leslie Ann Green, Defendants and Respondents.

No. 19192.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Jan. 31, 1985.

*1208Phillip L. Foremaster, St. George, for plaintiffs and appellants.

John W. Palmer, St. George, for defendants and respondents.

PER CURIAM:

The district court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants and dismissed plaintiffs’ amended complaint on the ground that the action was barred by the provisions of U.C.A., 1953, § 57-1-32.1 We affirm.

On July 27, 1979, plaintiffs sold and defendants purchased real property consisting of a house and lot in Washington County, Utah. Defendants agreed to assume and pay a first trust deed lien on the property in favor of Heritage Savings and Loan Association and executed a promissory note secured by a second trust deed for the balance of the purchase price. The note, in the amount of $15,000, called for interest at the rate of 10% per annum and was payable in full on January 27, 1980.

Defendants defaulted on the note and vacated the premises. According to their initial complaint, plaintiffs exercised their power of sale under the'trust deed and sold the property at trustee’s sale on September 3, 1980, for ten dollars.

On February 25, 1982, plaintiffs commenced this action, claiming a deficiency owing on the note in excess of the proceeds received on the sale. Section 57-1-32 provides:

> At any time within three months after any sale of property under a trust deed, as hereinabove provided, an action may be commenced to recover the balance due upon the obligation for which the trust deed was given as security....

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs did not file their deficiency claim in a timely manner under the statute, but plaintiffs were allowed to amend their complaint in lieu of dismissal. In the amended complaint, plaintiffs alleged breach of contract on the part of defendants and prayed for damages for that breach, for recovery of the fair rental value of the property during defendants’ possession, and also for punitive damages. Thereafter, the trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

The trial court ruled, and we agree, that section 57-1-32 provides the exclusive procedure for securing a deficiency judgment following a trustee’s sale of the real property under a trust deed. Plaintiffs’ election to sell the property to satisfy the debt precludes them from seeking any other remedy, including damages for breach of contract, which might have been available to them. Since plaintiffs’ action was not filed within three months of the date of the trustee’s sale of the real property, the trial court did not err in ruling that plaintiffs are not entitled to a deficiency judgment.

Because the judgment is affirmed on this ground, we do not reach defendants’ second argument, that section 78-37-1 applies where a debt is secured by a trust deed as well as when it is secured by a mortgage.

Affirmed. Costs to defendants.

1

. All statutory references are to U.C.A., 1953, as amended.
NO ONEATTENDED THE PUBLIC HEARING 

### AND NO COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED DURING THE 30-DA Y COMMENT PERIOD
#### Diane D. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-1083.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 29, 1987.

*192James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael L. O’Neill, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COBB, Judge.

The appellant, Diane D. Williams, was convicted of second-degree grand theft and sentenced to ten years in prison, exceeding her guidelines sentence and double the statutory maximum, based upon a finding that she was an habitual offender. The trial court listed the following reasons for departure:

> 1. The habitual offender determination.

> 2. Necessity for protection of the public, *citing Brady v. State,*457 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

> 3. Eight municipal code convictions that were not scored, and for which there were no analogous criminal statutes.

None of these reasons supports a departure sentence. The first reason has recently been invalidated by *Whitehead v. State,*498 So.2d 863, 11 FLW 553 (Fla.1986). Insofar as “protection of the public” is merely a reference to prior record, it cannot be used as a basis for departure under *Hendrix v. State,*475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985). Finally, we do not believe that municipal code violations, which are not considered serious enough to be scored under prior record, can serve as a clear and convincing reason for departure.

REVERSED and REMANDED for sentencing in accordance with the guidelines.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and DAUKSCH, J., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |     |                                                                           
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 17, 2010 | By: |                                                                           
|                      |     |                                                                           
|                      |     | Jonathan
 Snyder 
 Chief Executive Officer 
 (Principal Executive Officer)

---
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: June 13, 2007 |  | /s/ Dror Gad
Dror GadChief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Frank FOGAZZI, Appellee.

No. 87-0110.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 16, 1987.

Crystal S. Holjes of Morgaman & Skrzy-pek, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of dismissal because we conclude the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing appellant’s case as a sanction. *See Swindle v. Reid,*242 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

ANSTEAD, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Johnny B. WRIGHT.

No. 89-K-0326.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Wright, Johnny B.; — Defendants); applying for "writ of certiorari and/or re*892view; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 20082-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 136884.

Prior report: La.App., 537 So.2d 768.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of BigString  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2006  (the
"Report"), I, Robert DeMeulemeester,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do
hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

Dated:  November 14, 2006                        /s/ Robert DeMeulemeester
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Robert DeMeulemeester
                                               Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2191 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2191

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain rayon staple 
                                fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Ms. Collins introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain rayon staple 
                                fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN RAYON STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.55.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) in the article description, by striking ``filaments'' 
        and inserting ``staple fibers'';
            (2) by striking the date in the effective period column and 
        inserting ``12/31/2011''; and
            (3) by striking ``Free'' in the column 1 general rate of 
        duty column and inserting ``1.8%''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lillie BRUMFIELD and David Johnson v. Mildred S. CANNINO, Edward Thompson, Police Jury, Tangipahoa Parish, State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development, Dairyland Insurance Company and State Farm Insurance Company.

No. 88-C-0734.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Brumfield, Lillie; Johnson, David; applying for reconsideration of this Courts April 22, 1988, 523 So.2d 237, order; First Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CA86 1693; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 74295.

Reconsideration denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 139 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.139
                                      Agreed to October 23, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring),

SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Resolution:
        (1) Event.--The term ``event'' means the dedication of the 
    National Japanese-American Memorial to Patriotism.
        (2) Sponsor.--The term ``sponsor'' means the National Japanese-
    American Memorial Foundation.
SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF EVENT TO CELEBRATE THE DEDICATION OF THE 
NATIONAL JAPANESE-AMERICAN MEMORIAL.
    The National Japanese-American Memorial Foundation may sponsor the 
dedication of the National Japanese-American Memorial to Patriotism on 
the Capitol grounds on November 9, 2000, or on such other date as the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Rules and 
Administration of the Senate may jointly designate.

SEC. 3. TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    (a) In General.--The event shall be open to the public, free of 
admission charge, and arranged so as not to interfere with the needs of 
Congress, under conditions to be prescribed by the Architect of the 
Capitol and the Capitol Police Board.
    (b) Expenses and Liabilities.--The sponsor shall assume full 
responsibility for all expenses and liabilities incident to all 
activities associated with the event.

SEC. 4. STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT.

    (a) Structures and Equipment.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to the approval of the Architect of 
    the Capitol, beginning on November 8, 2000, the sponsor may erect 
    or place and keep on the Capitol grounds, until not later than 8:00 
    p.m. on Saturday, November 11, 2000, such stage, sound 
    amplification devices, and other related structures and equipment 
    as are required for the event.
    (b) Additional Arrangements.--The Architect of the Capitol and the 
Capitol Police Board may make any such additional arrangements as are 
appropriate to carry out the event.

SEC. 5. ENFORCEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS.

    The Capitol Police Board shall provide for enforcement of the 
restrictions contained in section 4 of the Act of July 31, 1946 (40 
U.S.C. 193d; 60 Stat. 718), concerning sales, advertisements, displays, 
and solicitations on the Capitol grounds, as well as other restrictions 
applicable to the Capitol grounds, with respect to the event.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### Kenneth Patrick HOEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-0877.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1987.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael W. Baker, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

*66PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *Harris v. State,*415 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.