alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K as
of December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000846919
<NAME> ESSEX INTERNATIONAL INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,429
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  194,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,239
<INVENTORY>                                    217,643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,936
<PP&E>                                         392,597
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 842,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          192,229
<BONDS>                                        421,340
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   842,755
<SALES>                                      1,332,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,332,049
<CGS>                                        1,102,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,102,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,994
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 66,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,988
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,508
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,183
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Sherin HARVEY v. Charles C. FOTI, Jr., et al.

No. 87-KH-0775.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Sherin Harvey, applying for reconsideration of writ denied, dated November 30, 1987, 515 So.2d 443, to the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 303-966.

Reconsideration denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) of North American Insurance Leaders, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paula S. Butler, Executive Vice President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Paula S. Butler          
|                       |  | Executive Vice President     
|                       |  | (principal financial officer)
Exhibit
      32 .2





Certification
      Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Brendan Technologies, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the "Company"), hereby certifies that:





To
      my
      knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
              October 13, 2006
            
            /s/
              LOWELL W. GIFFHORNLowell
              W. GiffhornChief
              Financial Officer
#### Joseph Leon STOWERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BL-106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 27, 1987.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Carl S. McGinnes, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Norma J. Munge-nast, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s convictions and sentences for two counts of robbery with a firearm, three counts of forgery and two counts of uttering a forged instrument are affirmed. *Brown v. State,*502 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (and cases cited therein); *Andre v. State,*431 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); *Brown v. State,*397 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); *McCloud v. State,*335 So.2d 257 (Fla.1976); and *Hedges v. State,*172 So.2d 824 (Fla.1965). We again certify the question set out in *VanTassell v. State,*498 So.2d 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), to the Florida Supreme Court as a question of great public importance.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, BARFIELD and JOANOS, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Danny WELCH v. C. Paul PHELPS, Secretary and the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections.

No. 88-CP-3051.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

Reconsideration Denied Feb. 24, 1989.

In re Welch, Danny; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; *1243Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA88-0274.

Prior report: La.App., 533 So.2d 177.

Denied.
# L_2006124EN.01001101.xml

| 11.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 124/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 124/11

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 714/2006

of 10 May 2006

amending Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 as regards the quantity covered by the standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of maize held by the Polish intervention agency

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 155 197 tonnes of maize held by the Polish intervention agency. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 (2) opened a standing invitation to tender for the resale on the Community market of 155 197 tonnes of maize held by the Polish intervention agency.

| (2) | Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Polish intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 246 437 tonnes. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Given the current market situation, the quantities of maize put up for sale by the Polish intervention agency on the internal market should be increased, taking the permanent invitation to tender to 246 437 tonnes.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 1164/2005 is hereby amended as follows:

| 1. | in Article 1, ‘155 197 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘246 437 tonnes’; |
| --- | --- |

1.

in Article 1, ‘155 197 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘246 437 tonnes’;

| 2. | in the title of the Annex, ‘155 197 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘246 437 tonnes’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

in the title of the Annex, ‘155 197 tonnes’ is replaced by ‘246 437 tonnes’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 188, 20.7.2005, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1989/2005 (OJ L 320, 8.12.2005, p. 22).

2

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Robert BOND.

No. 87-K-0612.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Bond, Robert; applying for writ of review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18278-KA; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 129544.

Prior report: La.App., 502 So.2d 1180.

Denied.
#### Sandra LeBlanc and Guy LeBLANC v. Dyane ADAMS, et al.

No. 87-C-2116.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re LeBlanc, Sandra; LeBlanc, Guy; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA 6432; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “A”, No. 85-02533.

Prior report: La.App., 510 So.2d 678.

Denied.
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Lorne Broten, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Baxx Systems Inc., a
Nevada corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
     subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     (c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 10, 2007

/S/ Lorne Broten
-------------------------
[Signature] CFO
# U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Decembe r3 , 201 4 Publi cHearin g fo rPropose d Revision s t o Veoli a E S Technica l Solution s LLC Titl e VAi rPermi t Nam e Addres s Emai l o rPhon e Numbe r (optional ) Affiliatio n Speakin g


### * Woul d lik e t o receiv e a cop yo fth e Respons e t o Comment s 1 2 ry

:—

- f " # 3 4 

# lutes-

fro-\.*r~\ / 3 5

- - ; ' * ^ 6 , T. . . J* ' tv 7 . V- J r , ,l \ '

- s . . i . - * v^ (

# J 8 . / ' <

i . 1 p A 9 ; f - •. . • ^ 

### - , ' _ 7 r\ 1 0 s

" / 4 - ' j / i < ' - 1 1 

# y n o 1 2 ' 1 » ' •.. . -f i

. 7 1 3 . a 1 4 1 5 1 6 

# 1
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our reports
dated April 12, 1999 (except with respect to the effect of the pending sale of
Eastern Telecom, Inc. discussed in Note B, as to which the date is March 27,
2000), related to the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997 of VSI Enterprises,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company"), included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements (Files Nos.
33-44036, 33-44035, 33-55094, 33-56856, 33-72512, 33-81314, 333-728, 33-85754,
333-15123, 333-18237, 333-18239, 333-30597, 333-44407, 333-48635, and
333-83035, and 333-87561).


/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 2000
**DQE EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-60966 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-3, Post EffectiveAmendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No. 33-29147 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statement Nos. 33-66488 and 33-72582 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 33-46773 and 33-87974 of DQE,Inc. on Form S-8, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-32433 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-4, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement Nos. 333-80377 and 333-80377-1 of DQE Capital Corporation on Form S-3, Amendment No. 2 to RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-85612 and 333-85612-01 of DQE, Inc. and DQE Capital Corporation on Form S-3, and Registration Statement on No. 333-102812 of DQE, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 30, 2003 (March 14, 2003 as to Note 21), which reportexpresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting for goodwill and unbilled revenues, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DQE, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 

March 20, 2003 

 

71
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Gene OLIVER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 81CA1015.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

March 3, 1983.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1983.

Certiorari Denied June 6, 1983.

J.D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Joel W. Cantrick, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Dolores Atencio, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

David F. Vela, Colorado State Public Defender, Deborah S. Waldbaum, Deputy State Public Defender, Denver, for defendant-appellant.

KELLY, Judge.

Defendant, Douglas Gene Oliver, appeals his jury conviction of second degree sexual assault, a violation of § 18-3-403(l)(e), C.R. S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). We affirm.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred by refusing to give defendant’s tendered instruction on the failure of the complaining witness, who was the mother of the victim, to report the sexual assault of her daughter at the earliest opportunity. We do not agree.

The trial court refused to give the jury defendant’s instruction which stated:

> “The failure of a complaining witness to report the assault at the earliest possible moment is a circumstance that discredits *153the testimony of the party alleged to have been outraged.”

Evidence that the victim of a sexual assault failed to make a complaint soon after the crime is admissible as a circumstance which tends to discredit that person’s testimony. *Padilla v. People,*156 Colo. 186, 397 P.2d 741 (1964). Here, the defendant was allowed to question the complainant concerning her delay of four days in reporting the sexual assault on her daughter, and was allowed to argue to the jury the inferences which could be drawn from this evidence.

Even if we assume that the rule allowing evidence of a victim’s delay in reporting a sexual offense applies to a non-victim complainant, we conclude that the trial court correctly declined to give the instruction. Requests for special credibility instructions for a special class of witnesses are generally denied because a general instruction on witness credibility, as given here, is sufficient. *People v. Estorga,*200 Colo. 78, 612 P.2d 520 (1980); *People v. Kelderman,*44 Colo.App. 487, 618 P.2d 723 (Colo.App.1980). We agree with the Minnesota Supreme Court that:

> “Although failure to complain promptly might in some cases bear on the issue of whether a sexual assault occurred, and although defense counsel is always free to argue the significance of any failure to complain promptly, we are acutely aware that there are often reasons which have nothing to do with guilt or innocence which explain a sexual assault victim’s failure to complain immediately. We therefore do not intend to require or encourage trial courts in a case such as this to give an instruction such as that requested by defense counsel.” *State v. Owens,*304 N.W.2d 916 (Minn.1981). Judgment affirmed.

VAN CISE and KIRSHBAUM, JJ., concur.
S. Con. Res. 35 Agreed to May 26, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, May 27, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his

designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday,

June 7, 1999, or until such time on that day as may be specified

by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are

notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House

adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 27, 1999, on

a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30

p.m. on Monday, June 7, 1999, for morning-hour debate, or until

noon on the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs

first.

SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to
S. Con. Res. 35—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #13029 and #13030]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

 Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4057-DR), dated 03/06/2012.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Straight-line Winds, and Flooding.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/29/2012 through 03/03/2012.                    

*Effective Date:*                         03/13/2012.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/07/2012.                    

*EIDL Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/06/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, dated 03/06/2012 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties:*                     (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Grayson, Larue, Ohio, Russell, Trimble.                

*Contiguous Counties:*                     (Economic Injury Loans Only):                

Kentucky: Adair, Breckinridge, Butler, Casey, Clinton, Cumberland, Daviess, Edmonson, Green, Hancock, Hardin, Hart, Marion, Mclean, Muhlenberg, Nelson, Oldham, Taylor, Wayne.

Indiana: Clark.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Lisa Lopez-Suarez,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-6700 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P