alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.8

150 years                                                             STANDARD
    with you                                                         CHARTERED


Date:          8th April 2003
Our ref:       C&I/LC/TEAM3/BKH


CONFIDENTIAL
------------

Bonso Electronics Ltd.
Units 1106-1110
11/F., Star House
3 Salisbury Road
Tsimshatsui
Kowloon

Attn.: Mr. Anthony So/Ms. Cathy Pang
------------------------------------

Dear Sirs,

                   BANKING FACILITIES: BONSO ELECTRONICS LTD.

We refer to our letter dated 5th March 2001 setting out the facilities made
available to your company (the "Company"), as varied by our letters dated 11th
May 2001 and 17th May 2002.

Following our recent discussions, we confirm that the terms of the facilities
have been further varied as follows:

STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT - HKD15,000,000.00 (previously HKD20,000,000.00)

The amount of this facility is reduced from HKD20,000,000.00 to HKD15,000,000.00

The tenor is one year up to 10th May 2003.

DOCUMENTATION

The following documentation is no longer required:

     o    All monies charge over deposits held by the Company with the Bank in
          an amount of not less than HKD5,000,000.00
          (10% extra margin required for major foreign currency deposits. The
          Bank reserves the right to require a higher margin.)

An arrangement fee of HKD10,000.00 will be debited to your current account.



Standard Chartered Bank
Corporate & Institutional Banking
Credit Operations

11 th Floor Standard Chartered Tower
388 Kwun Tong Road Kwun Tong Hong Kong

Incorporated in England with limited liability by Royal Charter 1853
The principal office of the Company is situated in England at 1 Aldermanbury
Square London EC2V 79B Reference Number ZC 18
================================================================================

<PAGE>


Bonso Electronics Ltd.                                                    Page 2


This letter will amend the terms of the existing facility letters which the Bank
has issued to the Company as previously varied, as set out above. In all other
respects, the terms of the existing facility letters as previously varied will
remain in full force and effect. This letter will be governed by Hong Kong SAR
law.

If you have any queries, please contact our Senior Relationship Manager Mr.
Joseph Ng, whose telephone number is 2821-1810.

We are pleased to be of service to you and take this opportunity to thank you
again for your custom.

Yours faithfully,
For and on behalf of STANDARD CHARTERED BANK


/s/  Anita Poon
----------------------------------
     Anita Poon
     Senior Credit Documentation Manager

 AP/ky
#### Billy MILLER v. MACON RIDGE FARMERS ASSOCIATION, et al.

No. 88-C-0791.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 6, 1988.

In re Miller, Billy; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-0147; Parish of Catahoula, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 13728.

Prior report: La.App., 525 So.2d 171.

Denied.

DENNIS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 24

- 00211

- CV

I N THE I NTEREST OF P.W., A C HILD §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County ( 360

- 727120

- 22 )

September 26, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s termination order . It is ordered that the termination

order of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
**Certification          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1. | The                    Report complies in all material respects with the requirements                    of section                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                    and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    Registrant.                     |

| November 14, 2006 | /s/ John                    S.                    Kovach                                                                   John                    S. KovachChief                    Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal                    financial and accounting officer) |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
### The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-2491

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Roman F. Siqueiros, also known * as Silverado, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 7, 1995 Filed: December 18, 1995

___________ Before FAGG, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Roman F. Siqueiros challenges the 100-month sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded gui lty to conspiracy to distribute and to 1 possess with intent to distribute marijuana and cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. We affirm.

For sentencing purposes, Siqueiros stipulated he managed o r supervised at least f ive individuals engaged in criminal activity, within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1. On appeal, Siq ueiros argues the district court erred in imposing an aggravating-role enhancement, as he did no t profit from his crimi nal activity and thus the enhancement conflicts with commentary to section 3B1.1.

### -2- We re view for clear error the district court's factual finding o f Siqueiros's role in the offense. See United States v. Skorniak , 59 F.3d 750, 757 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 64 U.S.L.W. 3348 (U.S. Nov. 13 , 1995). Notwithstanding that "persons who exercise a supervisory o r managerial role . . . [may] tend to profit more from it," the enhancement "is included primarily because of concerns about relative responsibility." U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, comment. (backg'd). The fact that Siqueiros may not hav e profit ed from his activity does not preclude application of th e enhancement; profit is only one factor the distr ict court should consider. Cf. United States v. Farah , 991 F.2d 1065, 1070 (2d Cir. 1993) (Sentencing Commission relegated profit factor to "no better than secondary importance " for purposes of determining defendant's aggravating role). Siqueiros' s off ense conduct--as described in his presentence report--adequatel y suppor ts the conclusion that he managed or supervised criminal activit y involving at least five participants. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(b). W e conclude the district court did not clearly err in applying th e enhancement.
Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                     SECTION 1.02 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Brooklyn  Cheesecake & Desserts Company,
Inc. (the  "Company") on form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, I
Anthony J. Merante  Vice-President  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that

      (iii) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (iv)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  present,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: March 28, 2005

                                      /s/ Anthony J. Merante
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Anthony J. Merante
                                      Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Brooklyn  Cheesecake & Desserts
Company,  Inc.  and will be  retained by and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.


                                                                              49
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 6

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, as a mark of respect to the memory

3 of R. Scott Bates, Legislative Clerk of the United States

4 Senate, all flags of the United States located on Capitol

5 Buildings or on the Capitol grounds shall be flown at half6 staff on the day of his interment.

Passed the Senate February 6, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 6

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Authorizing flags located in the Capitol complex to

Senate.Bates, Legislative Clerk of the United Statesbe flown at half-staff in memory of R. Scott
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 31

                Certification Pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

I, Robert E. Busch, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PSE&G Transition
          Funding II LLC (the Registrant) and other reports containing
          distribution information for the period covered by the Quarterly
          Report on Form 10-Q;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
          statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
          under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial information required to be
          provided to the trustee under the governing documents of the issuer is
          included in these reports; and

     4.   Based on my knowledge, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, the
          Servicer, has complied with its servicing obligations and minimum
          servicing standards.

<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
          Date: November 10, 2005       /s/ Robert E. Busch
                                        ---------------------------------------------------
                                        Robert E. Busch
                                        PSE&G Transition Funding II LLC
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
</TABLE>

                                       9
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134182 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134182 

 COA: 274118 

Kent CC: 04-008798-FH 

ANTHONY MICHAEL MOSS,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 4th quarter 10-K
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                 10,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         10,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       0
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                             10,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           10,000
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      130,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (130,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (130,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (130,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.00)



</TABLE>
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 28

Urging the Congress and the President to increase funding for the Pell

Grant Program and existing Campus-Based Aid Programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 21, 1999

Mr. JEFFORDS (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

DODD, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. HARKIN, and Mr. REED) submitted the

following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Urging the Congress and the President to increase funding

for the Pell Grant Program and existing Campus-Based

Aid Programs.

Whereas the Basic Educational Opportunity Grant Program,

now known as the Pell Grant Program in honor of Senator Claiborne Pell of Rhode Island, was first authorized

in the 1972 amendments to the Higher Education Act of

1965;

Whereas the Pell Grant Program has become the largest

need-based Federal higher education scholarship program

and is considered the foundation for all Federal student

aid;
2

•SCON 28 IS

Whereas the purpose of the program is to assist students

from low income families who would not otherwise be financially able to attend a postsecondary institution by

providing grants to students to be used to pay the costs

of attending the postsecondary institution of their choice;

Whereas in the late 1970’s, the Pell Grant covered seventyfive percent of the average cost of attending a public

four-year college; by the late 1990’s, it only covered thirty-six percent of the cost of attending a public four-year

college;

Whereas families across the country are concerned about the

rising cost of a college education, and for children from

low income families, the cost of college continues to be

an overwhelming factor in their decision to forego a college education;

Whereas children from high income families are almost twice

as likely to enroll in college as children from low income

families;

Whereas higher education promotes economic opportunity for

individuals and economic competitiveness for our Nation;

Whereas the Pell Grant and Campus-Based Aid Programs

target aid to low income students as effectively as any

programs administered by the Federal government; and

Whereas student borrowing to finance a postsecondary education has increased to an average indebtedness of

$9,700, and therefore increased grant aid is more important than ever: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress and the President, should,

3 working within the constraints of the balanced budget
3

•SCON 28 IS

1 agreement, make student scholarship aid the highest pri2 ority for higher education funding by increasing the max3 imum Pell Grant awarded to low income students by $400

4 and increasing other existing campus-based aid programs

5 that serve low-income students.

Æ
#### HAITIAN COMMUNITY FLAMINGO AUTO PARTS CORP., Appellant, v. LANDMARK FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FT. LAUDERDALE, Appellee.

No. 4-86-1857.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 28, 1987.

*171Alec Ross of Alec Ross Law Offices, North Miami Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

After denial of its motion to dismiss appellee’s complaint for foreclosure of a mortgage, appellant was given ten days to file an answer. Upon expiration of that period, appellee moved for entry of default, no answer having been filed. The motion for default was set for hearing on July 9, 1986. Appellant filed its belated answer to the complaint on July 1. As a result of the hearing of July 9 default was entered against appellant despite the fact that its answer had been filed.

Rule 1.500(b) and (c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provide that the court may enter a default only where the defendant “has failed to plead or otherwise defend,” and “[a] party may plead or otherwise defend at any time before default is entered.”

This court and others have interpreted the rule as prohibiting entry of a default where an answer is filed before the default is entered, even though the answer may have been untimely. *See Ingaglio v. Ennis,*443 So.2d 459 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); *Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. Marchese,*383 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). However, this does not preclude the imposition of sanctions other than default for dilatory conduct. *Marchese,*at 735 n. 4.

We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings. The trial court may impose sanctions upon appellant or its attorney as it deems appropriate.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          87,125
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         61,323
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,116
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,309
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,317
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,317
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0668 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CLAYTON DOUGLAS KIRN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 17, 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 10 2024

06/10/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0668