alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the periodic report of ENERGENX, INC., a Nevada corporation
      (the
“Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, GARY A. BEDINI,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





Date:
      November 9, 2007




By:
              /s/
                  Gary A. BediniGary
                  A. Bedini
#### Richard P. IEYOUB, in his Official Capacity as District Attorney for the Fourteenth Judicial District Court v. ACCREDITED SURETY & CASUALTY COMPANY, INC.

No. 89-C-1003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 2, 1989.

In Re Accredited Surety & Cas. Co. Inc.; —Defendants); Applying for Writ of Cer-tiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number CA89-0180; Parish of Calcasieu 14th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number 88 5298.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J.,

concurs. Relator is yet at liberty to move in the district court for trial of the permanent injunction.

DIXON, C.J., would grant the writ and remand to the court of appeal for consideration on merits.
#### Clyde A. GISCLAIR, et al. v. MATMOOR, INC., et al.

No. 89-C-0708.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Matmoor Inc.; Briggs, Elaine M.; Guirovich, Marion P.; Simoneaux, Audrey P.; Rene, Francis T. Dr.; Mathews, Lynne S.; Mathews, Dorothy M.; Mathews, Ruth M.; Olivera, Laura L.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Nos. 88-CA-0591, 88-CA-0592; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 29023, 28336.

Prior report: La.App., 537 So.2d 876.

Denied.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      quarterly report of Affinity Media International Corp. fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of Affinity Media International
      Corp.




Date:August
                14, 2006
            By:
            **/s/
              Howard
              Cohl**Howard
              CohlPresident




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Affinity Media International Corp. and
      will
      be retained by Affinity Media International Corp. and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333- 47666) pertaining to the 1999 Employee Stock Option Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-60983) pertaining to the Amended and
Restated 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Amended and Restated 1990
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, Directors Fee Stock Option Plan and Employment
Agreement with Bruce D. Benson of United States Exploration, Inc. of our report
dated March 13, 2003, except for Note 1 as to which the date is December 29,
2003 with respect to the 2002 consolidated financial statements of United States
Exploration, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Denver, Colorado
January 15, 2004
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William FONTANILLE.

No. 87-KK-1026.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 11, 1987.

In re Fontanille, William; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writ; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. “K”, No. 86-1300; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-K-336.

Granted in part; denied in part. It is ordered that trial commence within 30 days from this date; otherwise, it is ordered that defendant be released without bail. The application is otherwise denied.

DIXON, C.J.,

concurs in the order, since it is the least the defendant is entitled to; actually, the defendant is probably entitled to be released without bond immediately.

WATSON, J., would deny the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald WILLIAMS.

No. 87-KH-1371.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 20, 1988.

In re Williams, Donald; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 289-484; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-7013.

Denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      February 11, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Xu KechengName:
                Xu
      KechengTitle:
                President,
      Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive
  Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September
30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.




Date: November 12,
      2010
              By:
              /s/ Xu
      KechengName:
              Xu
  KechengTitle:
              President,
      Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive
      Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by
Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen
Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen
Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7542

STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:14-hc-02062-BO)

Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Dixon Prentice, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley, 

BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Dixon Prentice, a federal prisoner, appeals the 

district court’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* Prentice 

v. Andrews, No. 5:14-hc-02062-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept. 

30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by 

the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his 

administrative remedies.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

THOMAS LYNN TILLMAN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 234 WAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of December, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sunrise Technologies International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-27029) of our
reports dated February 19, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule of Sunrise Technologies
International, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, which reports are included in this Form 10-K/A.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

June 16, 1999
#### Timothy Edward KOKX, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-996.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 4, 1988.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., John Koenig, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has raised two issues on appeal pertaining to the sentence imposed on remand pursuant to *Kokx v. State,*498 So.2d 534 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Appellee agrees that the second issue raised, that the trial court erred in resentencing appellant without allowing him to be present, requires reversal for resentencing. Without addressing the substance of appellant’s remaining issue, appellee suggests that the court may impose the same sentence on remand.

Because the admitted error is so substantial as to require reversal of the sentence, we do not reach the merits of appellant’s argument pertaining to the alleged improper reasons for departing from the recommended sentence. Nor do we consider ap-pellee’s suggestion that the same sentence may be imposed on remand.

Accordingly, appellant’s sentence is vacated, and this cause is remanded for re-sentencing.

WENTWORTH, NIMMONS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
#### Mark McKENZIE v. PEOPLE’S DRUG STORE, INC., OF VICKSBURG and John F. Bove, Jointly and Severally.

No. 58328.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 9, 1989.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1989.

R. Charles Robb, Vicksburg, for appellant.

Frank G. Vollor, Vicksburg, for appel-lees.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Warren County; John E. Ellis, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Alvin and Odelia LACHNEY.

No. 87-KD-1805.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 3, 1987.

In re Lachney, Alvin; applying for supervisory and remedial writs; Parish of Avo-yelles, 12th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 61720.

Granted in part. It is ordered that the district court act promptly on relator’s motions. Otherwise denied.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 19, 2015 518170 

________________________________

In the Matter of IRYANNA I.,

Alleged to be a Neglected,

Abused and/or Severely

Abused Child.

ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OF SOCIAL SERVICES,

Respondent;

BENJAMIN K.,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 13, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

__________

Alexander Lesyk, Norwood, for appellant.

Maureen C. McGaw, Canton, attorney for the child.

__________

Lahtinen, J.P.

Appeals from an order and an amended order of the Family

Court of St. Lawrence County (Morris, J.), entered September 13,

2013 and September 16, 2013, which, in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Ct Act article 10, denied respondent's motion for summary

judgment dismissing the petition.

In 2013, petitioner commenced this proceeding alleging that

respondent had derivatively neglected, abused and/or severely

abused the subject child (born in 2013). Respondent moved for

summary judgment dismissing the petition. In an order and

amended order, Family Court found that triable issues of fact
-2- 518170 

existed regarding whether respondent had complied with required

counseling and whether the conditions that led to the previous

findings of abuse continued and, therefore, it denied the motion. 

Respondent now appeals. 

Respondent's counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment

on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be pursued

on appeal (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; Matter of

Jennifer HH. v Veronica II., 70 AD3d 1072, 1073 [2010]; Matter of

William XX. v Broome County Dept. of Social Servs., 11 AD3d 735,

736 [2004]). While "[i]ntermediate orders in Family Ct Act

article 10 matters involving abuse and neglect are appealable as

of right" (Matter of Ameillia RR. [Megan SS.], 95 AD3d 1525, 1526

[2012]; see Family Ct Act § 1112 [a]; cf. Matter of Confort v

Nicolai, 9 AD3d 428, 429 [2004]; Matter of Koch v Ackerman, 142

AD2d 581, 582 [1988]), a hearing was held after the order denying

respondent's motion was issued, and Family Court held that

petitioner had established that respondent derivatively neglected

and abused the subject child. As a result, we agree with the

parties that the instant matter is moot (see Matter of Ameillia

RR. [Megan SS.], 95 AD3d at 1526; Matter of Alexander K.

[Jennifer N.], 77 AD3d 1023, 1024 [2010]) and, therefore, we need

not address counsel's application to be relieved of his

assignment (see Matter of Alexander K. [Jennifer N.], 77 AD3d at

1024 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea M. [Ernest M.], 68 AD3d 1489,

1489-1490 [2009]). 

Garry, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.
-3- 518170 

ORDERED that the appeals are dismissed, as moot, without

costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of APD Antiquities,, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Cindy K. Swank, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                      |                                                         
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  July 21, 2009 | By: /s/ Cindy K. Swank                                  
|                      | Cindy K. Swank                                          
|                      | President, Treasurer, CEO, & Principal Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 63 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 63

Condemning the assassination of Armenian Prime Minister Vazgen Sargsian 
and other officials of the Armenian Government and expressing the sense 
   of the Congress in mourning this tragic loss of the duly elected 
                         leadership of Armenia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 1999

 Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. McConnell, Mr. Torricelli, Mr. Allard, 
   Mr. Reed, Mr. Bennett, Ms. Collins, Mr. Fitzgerald, Mr. Enzi, Mr. 
    Kerry, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Warner, Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Lieberman) 
 submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Condemning the assassination of Armenian Prime Minister Vazgen Sargsian 
and other officials of the Armenian Government and expressing the sense 
   of the Congress in mourning this tragic loss of the duly elected 
                         leadership of Armenia.

Whereas on October 27, 1999, several armed individuals broke into Armenia's 
        Parliament and assassinated the Prime Minister of Armenia, Vazgen 
        Sargsian, the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Karen Demirchian, the 
        Deputy Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Yuri Bakhshian, the Minister 
        of Operative Issues, Leonard Petrossian, and other members of the 
        Armenian Government;
Whereas Armenia is working toward democracy, the rule of law, and a viable free 
        market economy since obtaining its freedom from Soviet rule in 1991; and
Whereas all nations of the world mourn the loss suffered by Armenia on October 
        27, 1999: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) deplores the slaying of the Prime Minister of Armenia, 
        Vazgen Sargsian, the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Karen 
        Demirchian, the Deputy Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, 
        Yuri Bakhshian, the Minister of Operative Issues, Leonard 
        Petrossian, and other members of the Armenian Government struck 
        down in this violent attack;
            (2) strongly shares the determination of the Armenian 
        people that the perpetrators of these vile acts will be swiftly 
        brought to justice so that Armenia may demonstrate its resolute 
        opposition to acts of terror;
            (3) commends the efforts of the late Prime Minister and the 
        Armenian Government for their commitment to democracy, the rule 
        of law, and for supporting free market movements 
        internationally; and
            (4) continues to cherish the strong friendship between 
        Armenia and the United States.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Placer del Mar, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Humberto Bravo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
1st day of November, 2007.


/s/ Humberto Bravo
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 46

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 21, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that the July 20, 1999,

30th anniversary of the first lunar landing should be

a day of celebration and reflection on the Apollo-11

mission to the Moon and the accomplishments of the

Apollo program throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Whereas the Apollo-11 mission successfully landed a manned

spacecraft on the Moon on July 20, 1969, marking the

first time in history that humans have walked on the surface of the Moon or any other planet;

Whereas the 6 Apollo missions successfully departed Earth

aboard a Saturn V Rocket, the largest and most powerful

American rocket ever produced, en route to the Moon;

Whereas 12 Americans successfully landed on the surface of

the Moon where they performed various experiments and

collected samples for study, and planted the flag of the

United States of America in the lunar soil achieving a

milestone in American and human history;
2

SCON 46 RFH

Whereas the contributions of other Americans who made up

the thousands of contractors and Government employees

who worked on the Apollo program are recognized; and

Whereas the events of the Apollo missions are examples of

the great achievements of the American space program

reflecting the explorer’s spirit of the American people:

Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the 30th

3 anniversary of the first lunar landing should be a day of

4 celebration and reflection on the Apollo-11 mission to the

5 Moon and the accomplishments of the Apollo program

6 throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s.

Passed the Senate July 20, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.