17094 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 57 / Friday, March 23, 2012 / Notices 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) Identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) Identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) Indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) Explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 2886’’) 

in a prominent place on the cover page 

and/or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, http://

www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_

notices/rules/handbook_on_electronic_

filing.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents 

for which confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. All nonconfidential 

written submissions will be available for 

public inspection at the Office of the 

Secretary and on EDIS. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 19, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6997 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–827] 

In the Matter of Certain Portable 

Communication Devices Commission 

Determination Not To Review an Initial 

Determination Amending the 

Complaint 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 9) granting a joint motion to 

amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation in the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia 

Chen, Office of the General Counsel, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–4737. 

Copies of non-confidential documents 

filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on January 19, 2012, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Digitude 

Innovations LLC of Alexandria, Virginia 

(‘‘Digitude’’) on December 2, 2011 and 

amended on December 16, 2011. 77 FR 

2758 (Jan. 19, 2012). The complaint 

alleges violations of Section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the sale for importation, 

importation, or sale after importation of 

certain portable communication devices 

by reason of infringement of one or 

more of claims 7–13 and 15 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,926,636; claims 1–9 and 

17–25 of U.S. Patent No. 5,929,655; 

claims 1–8 and 14–20 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,208,879; and claims 1–5 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,456,841. The Commission’s notice 

of investigation named as respondents 

Research In Motion Ltd. of Ontario, 

Canada; Research In Motion Corp. of 

Irving, Texas; HTC Corporation of 

Taoyuan, Taiwan; HTC America, Inc. of 

Bellevue, Washington; LG Electronics, 

Inc. of Seoul, South Korea; LG 

Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood 

Cliffs, New Jersey; LG Electronics 

MobileComm U.S.A, Inc. of San Diego, 

California; Motorola Mobility Holdings, 

Inc. of Libertyville, Illinois; Samsung 

Electronics Co., Ltd of Seoul, South 

Korea; Samsung Electronics America, 

Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

LLC of Richardson, Texas; Sony 

Corporation of Tokyo, Japan; Sony 

Corporation of America of New York, 

New York; Sony Electronics, Inc. of San 

Diego, California; Sony Ericsson Mobile 

Communications AB of Lund, Sweden; 

Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications 

(USA) Inc. of Research Triangle Park, 

North Carolina; Amazon.com, Inc. of 

Seattle, Washington; Nokia Corporation 

of Espoo, Finland; Nokia Inc. of Irving, 

Texas; Pantech & Curitel 

Communication, Inc. of Seoul, South 

Korea; and Pantech Wireless, Inc. of 

Atlanta, Georgia. 

On January 26, 2012, Digitude and 

respondent Motorola Mobility Holdings, 

Inc. filed a joint motion to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation to 

substitute Motorola Mobility, Inc. for 

Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. On 

February 22, 2012, the Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response in 

support of the motion. On February 27, 

2012, the presiding administrative law 

judge issued the subject ID, granting the 

motion. No petitions for review were 

filed. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), 

and Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules 

of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 19, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6998 Filed 3–22–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES