alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 35 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, May 27, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or 
adjourned until noon on Monday, June 7, 1999, or until such time on 
that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in 
the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, May 27, 1999, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, June 7, 
1999, for morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day after 
Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate May 26, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                            S. CON. RES. 35

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
#### Clarence GRAY v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 57048.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

July 29, 1987.

Gregory L. Harper, Jackson, for appellant.

Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by De-Witt Allred, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Before HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER and ROBERTSON, JJ.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Hinds County; James D. Bell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Larry Alan Burns, United States District Judge for the **

Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY D. FISHER,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

OREGON BOARD OF PAROLE AND

POST-PRISON SUPERVISION and

BRIAN BELLEQUE

 Respondent - Appellees.

No. 07-36096 

D.C. No. CV-05-00829-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Owen M. Panner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 6, 2010

Portland, Oregon

Before: PAEZ and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and BURNS, District Judge.** 

FILED

JAN 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Randy Fisher maintains that the Oregon Board of Parole violated his due

process rights when it refused to grant him early parole eligibility. The district

court denied habeas relief, and we affirm.

In 2001, Fisher requested a hearing with the Board to determine his

eligibility for parole. See Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.105(2). The mandatory language of

§ 163.105 provides Fisher with a constitutionally protected liberty interest in

eligibility for parole, of which he cannot be deprived without due process. Miller

v. Oregon Bd. of Parole, No. 07-36086 (9th Cir. January __, 2011) (filed

concurrently with this disposition). State law determines the quantum of evidence

required for the Board’s decision to comport with due process requirements. 

Hayward v. Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 561–62 (9th Cir. 2010) (en banc). Oregon

law provides that the Board’s decision to deny Fisher the sentence conversion must

have been supported by “substantial evidence,” meaning a reasonable person could

have reached the same decision. Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.482(8)(c). See Miller. 

Fisher’s exchange with the Board during his hearing demonstrated that he

had gained little insight into why he raped and murdered someone he hardly knew. 

When asked for “any evidence . . . which supports that there is a reasonable

probability that you will remain in the community without violating the law,”

Fisher replied, “I don’t want to come back here . . . It’s not a very fun place . . . I
3

do not believe I will recommit any crimes.” Fisher also said he didn’t believe he

had any mental or emotional disturbances, but that he had done some reading and

learned “You can always walk away. Violence isn’t the answer.” Understandably,

these superficial statements did not inspire the Board’s confidence that Fisher was

capable of rehabilitation. 

A reasonable person, considering the record and testimony before the Board,

could have found that Fisher was not likely to be rehabilitated within a reasonable

period of time. See Or. Rev. Stat. § 163.105(3). The district court properly denied

his habeas petition. We decline to address whether his claims were procedurally

defaulted. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2); Cassett v. Stewart, 406 F.3d 614, 623–24 (9th

Cir. 2005).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0212

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

LOUIS TED CAYE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Kurt Krueger, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 26 2024

06/26/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0212
**Exhibit
      32**





Certification
      of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
      to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
      undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the
      period certified.




Date:
                December 22, 2006
            
            By:
            
            /s/
                Richard S. Foote**Richard
                S. Foote****President
                and Chief Executive Officer****(Principal
                Executive Officer)**By:
            
            /s/
                R. Bradley Forth**R.
                Bradley Forth****Executive
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
                Secretary****(Principal
                Financial Officer)**
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2289 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2289

     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Basic Red 1:1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASIC RED 1:1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.23 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Basic Red 1:1) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective column period and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Alain F. CRACCO, M.D. v. Phillip J. BARRAS.

No. 88-C-0116.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 25, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1988.

*372In re: Barras, Philip J.; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, 517 So.2d 1256; Parish of Orleans Civil District Court Div. “B” Number 83-6655.

Writ Granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the district court is reinstated for the following reasons:

The reasons for judgment of the district judge were correct. It was not clearly wrong for the trial judge to have discounted the self-serving testimony of the plaintiff-physician, nor were the sums of money awarded to the defendant as set-off against the plaintiff’s demand excessive. Furthermore, attorney’s fees may be collected under R.S. 9:2781 only if written demand is made “correctly setting forth the amount owed.” In this case the amount demanded, found to be subject to a set-off, was therefore not correct. Attorney’s fee statutes must be construed strictly because the award of attorney fees is exceptional and penal in nature. *Frank L. Beier Radio, Inc. v. Black Gold Marine, Inc.,*449 So.2d 1014 (La.1984).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Theundersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2005 to which this certification isbeing furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordancewith clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shallnot be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, orotherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actor the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specificallyincorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date: November 14,  2005** |                            |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                              | */s/  John Fitzpatrick*         |   |
|                              | Name:  John Fitzpatrick         |
|                              | Title:  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNX Gas Corporation (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer) of the Registrant, certify that to my knowledge, based upon a review of the Report:

(i) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

Date: May 2, 2006



/s/ Nicholas J. DeIuliisNicholas J. DeIuliisPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned officer of WII Components, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act.  In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 
| **Date:   May 13, 2011** |                             |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                          | /s/   John Fitzpatrick           |
|                          | Name:   John Fitzpatrick         |
|                          | Title:   Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/                Nancy J. McGurk     |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk         |   |
|   | Title: | Chief                Financial Officer |   |
|   | Date:  | August                15, 2005         |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             915,527
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      438,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,410,263
<PP&E>                                             225,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                      36,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,355,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,866,446
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               985
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,145,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,355,191
<SALES>                                            508,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   508,713
<CGS>                                              379,806
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,244,144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,219,634)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,219,634)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,219,634)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.09)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Placer del Mar, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Humberto Bravo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
1st day of November, 2007.


/s/ Humberto Bravo
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7289

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLIE WADE POWELL, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-88-193) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 16, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charlie Wade Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Cannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charlie Wade Powell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence under 18 U.S.C.A.§ 3582(c)(2) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Powell , No. CR-88-193 (M.D.N.C. July 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee will meet on April 17, 2012, at the Sheraton Crystal City, 1800 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, Virginia, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic information to optimize medical care of Veterans, and to enhance development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant to Veterans.

The Committee will receive program updates, and will continue to provide insight into optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic information into its health care program while applying appropriate ethical oversight and protecting the privacy of Veterans. The meeting focus will be on policies, regulations, and implications for the incorporation of genomic data, particularly whole genome data, into health care and clinical decision-making. The meeting will also receive an update on the status of the ongoing Million Veteran Program.

                    The Committee will receive public comments at 3 p.m. Comments are limited to 5 minutes each. Individuals who speak are invited to submit a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the official meeting record. Members of the public may also submit written statements for the Committee's review to Dr. Sumitra Muralidhar, Designed Federal Officer, Office of Research and Development (10P9B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, or by email at                     *Sumitra.muralidhar@va.gov.*                     Any member of the public wishing to attend or seeking additional information should contact Dr. Muralidhar at (202) 443-5679.                

By direction of the Secretary.

Dated: March 16, 2012.

Vivian Drake,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-6845 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P