alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R-330

April 15, 1947

.. . Hon. Ra

K Iackey opia~oa No. v-146 county udltor Yoakum County Re: Iavful right of a person Plains, Texas to hold the oiflces of city’ councl1man and ju8- tice of the peace at the Bear Sli: same time.

Yarrr inquiry under date OSApril 3, 1947, solicits an opinion of this departmeat on the question:

"Cau a city couaclbaaa. the 

### vas slec-, ted by tha people of an incorporatad city serve as jwtlce of the peace vhsn ha i,” appo2att;aaby the commlsslont’rs ’ ootart? Olty councilmen and justlces~ of the peace are sot authorized to perform the samC ,klnd ~ofssrvi448; ~nelther OSthem have any right to direct or review (Iorvlaes performed by th4 other; so there is nothing iEc4mpatlble in the perf’ormance of the duties of ’ said offloes. The pertlneat part OSSection 40 OSArticle KVI.of the CoPstltut Ion of Texas is as SoLlo~s :

“Ho person shall hold or exercise, at the same tine, more than one civil off100 of emoluwat , except Just Ice of the ?4ac4& County Commieslouer,: Notary Publib

. . . _~. That section of the Constltut Ion, aa It per

### tains to the osslce of Just ice of the Peace is ia the In 1856 the Supremb 60-t mid, 16"Jb: 59: :. . . : aIt 18 clear, therefore, ~that tVo civil oiflaes of emolument canuot be unltifi In the .; ,..
: In 1890 the Supreme Court cited th4 Pow411 OIs6 with approval .inpaal va. Tovumll(a, 77 %x. 464,- ..

Hon. F&J Iackey, Page 2, V-146

14 s. w. 365, in which the Court

_ agaia decided that one person may hoid more than one office of emolumnt at the same tlms IS one of such offices be that of justice of the peace. In that aase, Gaal vas one of the elected couatg commlssloners af El Paso County and accepted the ofilce of mayor OSthe incorporate% town of TaUta. 9!he Suprem CorPt decided tYrat,under the Ooaatltutioa, Gaal could 1avfuUy hold the oiflces OScwnty coswnlasioMr OSi!l Paso Oountf and mayor OSfslata at the samatime; ths court said:

n

. . . the wade
. . . iW&oata that It vaa intended that a pep ~Opinion Boa. O-382, 0-2Ofj~, o-2284 an&O-6524 OSthis department conetausd the 1afiguage of go&Ion 40 OSArticle XVI OSthe cbfwtftutlofl. Wesmlos4 a copy OSikaahOStboso oplaloar for y0ur i&mnat ten.

Ys are OSthe opiuion thult a **psrsoa** may

### hold. the 

### offloes OS

### city aeurraflmia an%jnutlaa d the maas at the afme t’im.

A person mayho113the oSSi~a of blk~ 

### a0uacllmaa and justice OSthe pea08 at the aam ttas under sprclSi0 pmolslona of +A. XV& Sea. 40, OSt&BTexar Qrrartitutfon. Pour8 very truly, :&TTeaimz - 6P l!ssAa

WTWral:%r:ra*j
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lillian TARVER.

No. 87-KK-0778.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1987.

In re Tarver, Lillian; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus and prohibition; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 153144; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW-87-343.

Denied.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Theodora Lee McAlister, Appellant

No. 06-14-00068-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

F14447). Memorandum Opinion delivered 

by Justice Carter, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Theodora Lee McAlister, has adequately indicated her

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 30, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 24 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. CON. RES. 24

 To express the sense of Congress on the need for the United States to 
defend the American agricultural and food supply system from industrial 
                    sabotage and terrorist threats.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 1999

  Mr. Lugar submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To express the sense of Congress on the need for the United States to 
defend the American agricultural and food supply system from industrial 
                    sabotage and terrorist threats.

Whereas the President has begun to implement programs to protect the critical 
        infrastructures of the United States from attack;
Whereas the American agricultural and food supply system, a highly technological 
        and efficient system for growing, processing, distributing, and 
        marketing food and other agricultural products for the world market, is 
        vulnerable to threats and attacks, particularly threats and attacks 
        employing weapons, technologies, and materials of mass destruction;
Whereas the American agricultural and food supply system has not been included 
        in counterterrorism planning;
Whereas critical infrastructure protection efforts must include response 
        planning for potential threats and attacks on the American agricultural 
        and food supply system;
Whereas the Department of Agriculture must play an active role in the 
        counterterrorism and critical infrastructure preparedness plans of the 
        United States; and
Whereas a successful strategy for protection of the American agricultural and 
        food supply system must also include cooperation with State and local 
        authorities and the private sector: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the United States should take steps that are necessary 
        to protect the American agricultural and food supply system 
        from attacks, particularly attacks employing weapons, 
        technologies, and materials of mass destruction; and
            (2) the Department of Agriculture should take the lead in 
        protecting the American agricultural and food supply system.
                                 <all>
```
### JEPTOFTRANSPORWIO N 

### SERVE D FEBRUAR

Y 17 , 201 0 nnri ; 

### I S

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F 

### RAINBO WAI RACADEM Y FA A DOCKE T No . CP09WP001 0 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DMS No . FAA-2009-0847 ORDE RO FDISMISSA L O n Octobe r

8 , 2009 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafter referre dt o a s "Complainant" ) file daComplaint . O n Septembe r 9 , 2009 , Responden t

Rainbo w Ai r Academ y (hereinafte r

"Respondent" ) ha drequeste dahearing . O n February 9 , 2010 , Responden t

withdre w it s reques t

for hearing , citin g settlemen t of th e matter . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , an agenc y attorne y may withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t fo r ahearing withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e law judge . I f an agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r aparty withdraw s th e reques t for ahearing an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r thi s subpart withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g havin g bee n rea dan dconsidered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . Respondent' s Withdrawa l o f Reques t for Hearin g b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwithprejudice .S O ORDERED .

1 ' _. . , ^ /- I 1.,,; ^ 

### Richar dC . Goodwi

n U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t - Servic e Lis t^ v FA A Docke t No . CP09WP001 0 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Marvi n R . Grimmett , Presiden t Rainbo w Ai r

Academy , Responden t 260 1 E . Sprin g Stree t Lon g Beach , C A 9080 6 TEL : 562-424-011 9 FAX : 562-989-050 8 Courtne y Adolph , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Western-Pacifi c Regio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-712 8 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Advisor : 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistant : 202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e in perso n o r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federal Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W, , Wilbu r Wright Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1990
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1990
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1990
<CASH>                                           3,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,800
<PP&E>                                         685,274
<DEPRECIATION>                                (54,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 637,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,048
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     605,863
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   637,234
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               180,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (180,007)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (180,007)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (180,007)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Carol Gray GAITOR, Appellant, v. John GAITOR, Appellee.

No. 88-422.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 4, 1988.

Carol Gray Gaitor, in pro per.

John Gaitor, in pro per.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).
#### SUCCESSION OF George Glen PAYNE.

No. 88-C-0521.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1988.

In re Payne, Wendell Lynn — Other; Payne, Kendell Glen — Other; Payne, Kimberly Anita — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR86-1269; Parish of Grant, 35th Judicial District Court, No. 5786.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 803.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.2








Certification
by the Chief Financial Officer


of


Boardwalk
GP, LLC


pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as
adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the
undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk GP, LLC, hereby certifies, to
such officer's knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009, (the "Report") of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, (the
"Partnership") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.





April 29,
2009


/s/ Jamie
L. Buskill


Jamie L.
Buskill


Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2290 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2290

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on p-Chloro-o-Nitro 
                                Aniline.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on p-Chloro-o-Nitro 
                                Aniline.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-CHLORO-O-NITRO ANILINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to p-Chloro-o-Nitro Aniline) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective column period and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-92824, 333-65361, 333-65359 and 333-65363) each on Form S-8 of Franklin
Financial Corporation of our report dated May 15, 2000, relating to the
financial statements and related schedules for the Franklin Financial Employees
Retirement Savings Plan as of and for the years ended December 31, 1999 and
1998, which report appears in Exhibit 99 of this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Franklin Financial Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1999.


/s/ Heathcott & Mullaly, P.C.
------------------------------------

Brentwood, Tennessee
June 28, 2000
Exhibit 23
Consent of KPMG LLP

                             INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors
Carolina First Bancshares, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
33-63390) on Form S-3,  (No.  33-43037) on Form S-8 and (No.  333-73221) on Form
S-8, of Carolina  First  Bancshares,  Inc., of our report dated January 18, 2000
relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Carolina First Bancshares,  Inc.
and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related  consolidated
statements of income,  changes in shareholders' equity and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1999,  included in the December 31, 1999 Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Carolina
First Bancshares, Inc.




                                                                    /S/KPMG LLP




Charlotte, North Carolina
March 30, 2000
50160.

#### CHAPPELL v. THE STATE.

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was indicted for murder but was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. *Held:*

1. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury on involuntary manslaughter. The state’s evidence revealed that defendant and the deceased while present at a rooming house in Atlanta, became engaged in a fight over the purchase of marijuana. Defendant was armed with a pistol and the deceased was unarmed. The two combatants moved outside the house into the street. Defendant fired his pistol and inflicted a fatal head wound. The defendant testified that while in the street, he turned to walk away and the deceased came up behind him. Defendant turned and shot the victim "without aiming,” and "not intending to kill him.” The evidence did not raise the issue of involuntary manslaughter by the commission of an unlawful act other than a felony, the only grade of involuntary manslaughter possible under these facts. Code Ann. § 26-1103 (a). While defendant denied an intent to kill and stated that he shot without aiming, his testimony clearly shows that he intended to fire his pistol at the victim. This evidence amounts to an aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, a felony. Code Ann. § 26-1302 (b).

2. Defendant placed his character in issue by his own testimony. During argument, the district attorney stated: "At any rate, it is even presumed that the deceased had good character. That is not really relevant about the deceased.” Defendant moved for a mistrial because of this reference to the deceased’s character and it was denied. There is some authority for the statement that the law presumes that every man has a good character. See *Bennett v. State,*86 Ga. 401, 404 (12 SE 806). However, this reference to deceased’s character was totally irrelevant to any issue in the case and it was erroneous to permit the district attorney to make this argument. However, it was harmless. The verdict of guilty was supported by the evidence. The improper argument could not have affected the result. *Lee v. State,*
      *376116 Ga. 563 (1) (42 SE 759).

Argued February 3, 1975

Decided March 7, 1975

Rehearing denied March 26, 1975.

*John Thomas Chason,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carole E. Wall, Jack E. Mallard, Joseph J. Drolet, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 03, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, April 03, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0353. JOHN W. OXENDINE et al. v. GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY & 

CAMPAIGN FINANCE COMMISSION.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV294672
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                    SUNRISE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.

           CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, FORMER INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-73211), Registration Statement (Form S-3, No. 333-72829),
Registration Statement (Form S-2, No. 333-64975) and Registration Statement
(Form S-2, No. 333-35045) of our report dated March 10, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Sunrise Technologies
International, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1996.

                                       /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Palo Alto, California
March 30, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Vector Intersect Security Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2008

/s/ Yaron EitanName:  Yaron EitanTitle:      Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive, Accounting and
Financial officer)


---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 3, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291:

                    1.                     *William Bradley Giblet and Lita Giblet, both of Hydro, Oklahoma, and Gaylon Vogt, Weatherford, Oklahoma,*                     to acquire control of Ryan Bancshares, Inc., parent of The First State Bank, both in Ryan, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 16, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6801 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P