alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.16(a)





Schedule of Employment Continuation Agreements of Named Executive Officers dated September 30, 2018.


						
	Name
	Termination Benefit

	
Stephen D. Westhoven, President and Chief Executive Officer	

Three times the sum, of (x) his then annual base salary and (y) the average of his annual bonuses paid or payable with respect to the last three calendar years ended prior to the Change of Control.

	
Patrick J. Migliaccio, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	 
Two times the sum, of (x) her then annual base salary and (y) the average of her annual bonuses paid or payable with respect to the last three calendar years ended prior to the Change of Control (“2x”).

	
Amy Cradic, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Non-Utility Businesses, Strategy and External Affairs	

2x

	
Amanda Mullan, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	

2x

	
Nancy A. Washington, Senior Vice President and General Counsel	

2x
#### Betty DENSON, formerly known as Betty Washington, Appellant, v. Fredward FAYSON, Virginia Fayson, his wife, individually, and Fredward Fayson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Idella E. Brown, deceased, Appellees.

No. 87-344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Oct. 6, 1987.

Spiegelman & Spiegelman and Robert I. Spiegelman, Miami, for appellant.

L.E. Thomas, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On authority of *Stewart v. Johnson,*142 Fla. 425, 194 So. 869 (1940), we reverse the trial court’s order finding that a will dated October 9, 1975, was revoked by a subsequent invalid will of May 22, 1982.

The applicable doctrine of dependent relative revocation provides that where a testator makes a new will revoking a prior valid will, and the new will is found to be invalid, the prior will may be re-established on the grounds that the revocation was dependent on the validity of the new will, and that the testator would have preferred the earlier will to intestacy.

Reversed and remanded.
#### STATE ex rel. Rubin TACKNO v. John P. WHITLEY, Warden.

No. 88-KH-2260.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Tackno, Rubin; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 249-185.

Denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**




**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Index Oil and Gas Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyndon West, the
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Index Oil and Gas Inc. and will be retained by Index Oil and Gas Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





*/s/
                Lyndon West*
              
              Lyndon
                West
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              
              Date:
                August 14, 2007
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2417 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that are 

not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple 

fibers that are not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE 

4 FIBERS, NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHER5 WISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2417 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fibers 

(polyacrylonitrile staple) containing 85 percent or more 

by weight of acrylonitrile 

units and 2 percent or more 

but not over 3 percent of 

water, not pigmented (ecru), 

crimped, with an average filament decitex of 1.3 (plus or 

minus 10 percent) and fiber 

length of 40 mm (plus or 

minus 10 percent) (provided 

for in subheading 

5503.30.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
#### Michael F. CHINIGO v. GEISMAR MARINE, INC., Cooper Gilder Chemicals, Inc. and Phillip H. Kerr.

No. 87-C-2109.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Chinigo, Michael F.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0563; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 34594.

*458Prior report: La.App., 512 So.2d 487.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 14071-000; Project No. 12866-002]

                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed                           ( print page 2289)                        filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Mississippi River, near the town of Avondale, in Jefferson Parish, Louisiana. The applications were filed by FFP Project 10, LLC for Project No. 12866-002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14071-000.                

                    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-704 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                     People's Savings Financial Corp.
                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                  (in thousands except per share amounts)

                                              Year ended December 31, 
<S>                                              <C>     <C>     <C>
                                                 1996    1995    1994

Net income - primary and fully diluted         $4,014  $3,389  $3,565    

Weighted Average Common Stock and Common
 Equivalent Stock

Weighted average common stock outstanding       1,910   1,954   1,996     

Assumed conversion (as of the beginning of
each period or upon issuance during a period)
of stock options outstanding at the end of 
each period                                        45      33      26    

Weighted average common stock outstanding
 - primary                                      1,955   1,987   2,022 

Weighted average common stock outstanding       1,910   1,954   1,996   

Assumed conversion (as of the beginning of 
each period or upon issuance during a 
period) of stock options outstanding at 
the end of each period                             65      35      26   

Weighted average common stock outstanding
 - fully diluted                                1,975   1,989   2,022   

Earnings Per Common and Common Equivalent Share

Primary                                         $2.05   $1.71   $1.76 

Fully diluted                                   $2.03   $1.70   $1.76   

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                    |   |                          |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 16, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Snyder           |   |
|                    |   |                               |   |
|                    |   | Jonathan Snyder               |   |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                    |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 157

Expressing the Sense of the Congress that the Government of Mexico should

adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the Colorado

and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio Grande Treaty between the United

States and Mexico.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. GRAMM) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the Sense of the Congress that the Government

of Mexico should adhere to the terms of the 1944 Utilization of Waters of the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and

of the Rio Grande Treaty between the United States

and Mexico.

Whereas, the United States and Mexico signed a Treaty on

Water Utilization on February 3, 1944, to divide the waters of the Rio Grande and Colorado River systems, and;

Whereas, the Treaty required Mexico to deliver a minimum

of 350,000 acre feet of water per year on a five year average from six Mexican tributaries, and;
2

SCON 157 IS

Whereas, the Treaty required the United States to deliver a

minimum of 1,500,000 acre feet of water per year from

the Colorado River, and;

Whereas, the United States has never failed to meet its obligation under the Treaty, and;

Whereas, during the period of 1992–1997, Mexico failed to

meet its obligations under the treaty by 1,024,000 acre

feet, and;

Whereas, a recent study conducted by the Texas A&M University agriculture program has determined the economic

impact to South Texas from this water loss due to noncompliance with the Treaty at $441,000,000 per year;

Whereas, the Government of Mexico has not presented any

plan to repay its entire water debt, as required by the

Treaty: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that:

3 (1) The President of the United States should

4 promptly utilize the full powers of his office to bring

5 about compliance with the 1944 Treaty on Water

6 Utilization in order that the full requirement of

7 water be available for United States use during the

8 next full crop season.

9 (2) The United States Section of the Inter10 national Boundary and Water Commission should

11 work to bring about full compliance with the 1944

12 Treaty on Water Utilization and not accept any
3

SCON 157 IS

1 water debt or deficit repayment plan which does not

2 provide for the full repayment of water owed.

Æ
EXHIBIT
13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British Virgin
Islands international business company (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify,
to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 20-F")
of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information
contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.











Dated:October 20,
      2009





/s/ Anthony
      So


Anthony
      So


President,
      Chief Executive Officer and
Treasurer
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Warren MAYES.

No. 89-KK-0274.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 2, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-2251; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “2”, No. 328-724.

Granted. The cases, 89-KK-0266, 89-KK-0267 and 89-KK-0274 are consolidated. The judgments of the Court of Appeal are vacated and reversed; the cases are remanded to the district court and the rulings of the trial court denying defendants’ motions are reinstated.
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 63

Condemning the assassination of Armenian Prime Minister Vazgen Sargsian

and other officials of the Armenian Government and expressing the

sense of the Congress in mourning this tragic loss of the duly elected

leadership of Armenia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 29, 1999

Mr. ABRAHAM (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. TORRICELLI, Mr. ALLARD,

Mr. REED, Mr. BENNETT, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. FITZGERALD, Mr. ENZI,

Mr. KERRY, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. EDWARDS, and Mr.

LIEBERMAN) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Condemning the assassination of Armenian Prime Minister

Vazgen Sargsian and other officials of the Armenian

Government and expressing the sense of the Congress

in mourning this tragic loss of the duly elected leadership

of Armenia.

Whereas on October 27, 1999, several armed individuals

broke into Armenia’s Parliament and assassinated the

Prime Minister of Armenia, Vazgen Sargsian, the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Karen Demirchian, the

Deputy Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Yuri

Bakhshian, the Minister of Operative Issues, Leonard
2

•SCON 63 IS

Petrossian, and other members of the Armenian Government;

Whereas Armenia is working toward democracy, the rule of

law, and a viable free market economy since obtaining its

freedom from Soviet rule in 1991; and

Whereas all nations of the world mourn the loss suffered by

Armenia on October 27, 1999: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That the Congress—

3 (1) deplores the slaying of the Prime Minister

4 of Armenia, Vazgen Sargsian, the Chairman of the

5 Armenian Parliament, Karen Demirchian, the Dep6 uty Chairman of the Armenian Parliament, Yuri

7 Bakhshian, the Minister of Operative Issues, Leon8 ard Petrossian, and other members of the Armenian

9 Government struck down in this violent attack;

10 (2) strongly shares the determination of the Ar11 menian people that the perpetrators of these vile

12 acts will be swiftly brought to justice so that Arme13 nia may demonstrate its resolute opposition to acts

14 of terror;

15 (3) commends the efforts of the late Prime

16 Minister and the Armenian Government for their

17 commitment to democracy, the rule of law, and for

18 supporting free market movements internationally;

19 and
3

•SCON 63 IS

1 (4) continues to cherish the strong friendship

2 between Armenia and the United States.

Æ
## 2012 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

12-3-2012 

# U S A v . J o seph P a s s al a qua
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al
D ock e t N o . 11-4244

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2012 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . J os e p h P as s al a qua " (2012). 2012 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 84. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2012/84

## UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 11
- 4244

United States v. Passalaqua

ORDER

At the direction of the Court , t he opinion and judgment filed November 29, 2012 are hereby vacated. The case will be submitted to a reconstituted merits panel for disposition.

For the Court, /s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Dated: December 3, 2012 JK/cc: Mark E. Coyne, Esq. David W. Feder, Esq. K. Anthony Thomas, Esq.
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Shaun Passley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
EPAZZ, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of EPAZZ, Inc.





Date:  May
15, 2008





By:/s/
Shaun Passley


Shaun
Passley,


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and


Principal
Accounting Officer
Jaime Patlevic 

2710 Galpin Avenue 

Royal Oak, MI 48073 

March 19,2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Approve Delta Air Lines Application for Detroit to Haneda Service 

Dear Secretary La.uvvu. 

On behalf of my business, I am writing to express our strong support for the application of Delta Air Lines for new 

nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. 

Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many corporations have strong trade 

and market presence with Japan. There are over 500 Japanese companies located in Michigan and hundreds more 

whose business models rely on access to Japan and it's market. The growth of our business ties with Japan has 

created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers look to the convenience of flying into 

Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport 

Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This 

summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to 

make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition of Haneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit 

our business travelers. 

Thank you for consideration of this request. 

)," t : \ . 

; ! 

..... '