alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# [ UNITED STATES ENVIRO N MENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 6 1445 ROSS AV ENUE. S UITE 1 200 D ALLAS. TX 75202-2 733 

# MAR 23 2006

Th e Ho no rable Kath leen H artnett Whi le C hairman T exas C ommi s sion o n Envir onment al Quality P .O. Box 13087 Austin. TX 7 87 11-3087 Dear Chairman Whil e : On J anuary 2 3
. 2006, y our offi ce s ubmitted to us a propos ed revi sion to th e Tex as S tate Implement ation P lan ( SIP)
. Thi s pr o po sal , re ceiv ed in our o ffice on January 2 6 , 2006 , co ntained a revi s ion to t he 30 TAC, Chapter 10 1. "General Air Quali ty Rule s" f or Emi ssions Event s and Sc heduled Main tenance , S tartup. an d S hutdow n Activi tie s.
a ve reviewed t he s ub mi ssion f or thi s s pecific c hapter of t he Texas C omm is sion on E nvironmen tal Q uality (TCEQ ) regulations i n ac cordance wi th the U .S
. E nvironmen tal Prot ection A gency' s poli cy f or determinin g completene ss o f SIP submittal s and ha ve det ermined that the s ubmittal i s a dminis tratively co mplete. We will 

### be revi ewin g thi s SIP r evision for approval a nd w ill pub lish the appropriate a ction in (he Fed eral Register
. T he TCEQ will be informed o f our pro g ress d uring th i s p roces s. 

### If I may b e o f f u rther a ssista nce in this mat t er, plea se c on tact me at (214 ) 6 65-2 100, o r yo ur s taff ma y co ntac t M r . Th om as D i gg s o f m y s taff at (214 ) 665

- 310 2
. Thank yo u for yo ur s u ppo rt i n pr otecting hum an he alth and th e environment. Sincerel y yo urs,

Ric hard E. Greene Regi onal Admin istrator
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2353 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rhenogran CLD–80. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Rhenogran 

CLD–80. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RHENOGRAN CLD–80. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.74 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Rhenogran CLD–80) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2353 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### SPACELINK OF FLORIDA, INC., Appellant, v. GOLDEN LAKES VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.

No. 4-86-1692.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1987.

*33Janis Brustares Keyser of Reid and Ric-ca, P.A., and Brackett, Cook, Sned, Welch and Scott, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Phillip C. Gildan of Nason, Gildan, Yeager and Gerson, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GOLDMAN, MURRAY, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a final summary judgment and raises the issue: Who is responsible for the payment of sales tax for the sale, rental or use of tangible personal property when the agreement between the parties is silent as to which party bears the burden of payment of the State sales tax. The trial judge held that the lessor was responsible for payment of the tax. We agree and affirm.

We feel that the decision and reasoning of the court in *Oven v. Dawirs,*419 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), is applicable to the facts of this case.

AFFIRMED.

LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Steven R. TROQUILLE.

No. 86-K-2076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 23, 1987.

In re Troquille, Steven R.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17987-KA; Parish of Webster, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 49976.

Prior report: La.App., 493 So.2d 686.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SouthPeak Interactive
Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended September 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Melanie Mroz, Chief Executive Officer, President, and interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to and solely for the
purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amdended; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
February 16, 2010








/s/
      Melanie MrozMelanie
      MrozPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Interim Chief Financial
    Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GROVER SELLERS 

ATTORNEY GENEnrr 

Honorable Bert Ford, kdmlnietrator 

Texas Liquor Control Board 

Austin, Texas 

D8ar Sir: Oplniaa 80. 

we quote an follawm 

wea &wohibitad Ln the 

*2.. 16 it neooaaat 

arlglnal eloot i

to allegs an4 prom tha 

en w tm moot rqourt, 

aleotion in ridoh absolute pm%UbltiOrp 

was estabU.@ha&, en& to ohranalof&aaUjr 

p r slr o utt he r 8a a ltoa f a4bsoWUkt l 1 06- 

‘ticmu $,a whioh the sale of bsar anLJ had 

baaa lsgallnced, and that lage4~izfng the 

sale of all alaohollc baveraWm hd 

failed la a vota uptm the Ssmae aubaltted 

to the people9 
fioncuwbls Bert PxY%, page 2 

"3* would there bs surfioient evld%mu to 

EI 

oyd that~the 861s of liquor 1s uplawful 

a ahtnrlng that et a givein time an slso- 

.tlon bad bean ~suoaesnfully carried to 

prohibit the sale of all alcohollo bev- ' 

oragse, and that oubeoqwntly no, elaotlori 

had bean bald In this wxmty hevlng the 

effeot ot la&elizlng the aale of liquor?* 

‘&bile ws have not toun4 inny appellate CoupI deoiofon 

In point u on the qIlertlom3 gmQlnmds4, we ba+s giran 0are;fUl. 

~onaUara J on to the mme, and we hate raaohed tha foll~~#ring[ 

axloluaMr t 
Honorable Ret Foxd, ps$e 3 

wlth5.n the co~urity. It ie OUP opinion that the legal .etatua 

ot fob pr ocntuu (4%) beer was not altered bg the 1940 

sladtlon; failure to legeli all liqUOrs did not 

prohibit the sale, etc..of the beer, nhics had beon =%$%%d 

by the 1939 sleotion. 

APFROVXD 

%y 8. 3,
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British
Virgin Islands international business company (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2008 (the
"Form 20-F") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: November 14, 2008

_/s/ Anthony So
---------------
Anthony So
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

                                                                January 11, 1999

JPS Textile Group, Inc.
555 N. Pleasantburg Drive
Suite 202
Greenville, South Carolina 29607

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     Reference is made to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of 
January 11, 1999 (the "Agreement"), by and between JPS Converter and Industrial 
Corp. ("Seller") and Belding Hausman Incorporated ("Purchaser").

     As inducement for Purchaser to enter into the Agreement, you agree as 
follows:

     1.  You (on your own behalf and on behalf of your subsidiaries other than 
Seller) hereby agree to be bound by the provisions of Section 6.4 of the 
Agreement.

     2.  You hereby absolutely and unconditionally (except as provided in the 
next sentence) guarantee the due and punctual performance and discharge by 
Seller of all of its obligations under the Agreement, and further agree that if 
Seller shall fail to perform and discharge any such obligation in accordance 
with the terms of the Agreement, you shall forthwith perform and discharge any 
such obligation, as such performance and discharge is required to be made or 
done by Seller. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you shall have the benefit of 
any defenses, offsets, setoffs and counter-claims available to Seller.

     3.  Your liability under this letter agreement shall in no manner be 
impaired, affected or released by the insolvency, bankruptcy, making of an 
assignment for the benefit of creditors, arrangement, compensation, composition 
or readjustment of Seller, or any proceeding affecting the status, existence or 
assets of Seller or other similar proceedings instituted by or against Seller 
and affecting the assets of Seller.

     This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of 
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute 
one and the same instrument. This letter agreement shall be 
<PAGE>   2
construed and interpreted, and the rights of the parties determined, in 
accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware (without reference to the 
choice of law provisions of Delaware law).

          Kindly confirm your agreement to the foregoing by signing the 
enclosed copy of this letter, whereupon it shall be deemed to be a binding 
agreement between us.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        BELDING HAUSMAN INCORPORATED


                                        By: /s/ Nancy Zarin
                                            -------------------------------
                                            Name: Nancy Zarin
                                            Title: President & CEO


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

JPS TEXTILE GROUP, INC.


By: /s/ John Sanders
    ----------------------------------
    Name: John Sanders
    Title: Executive Vice President -
           Finance and Chief Financial
           Officer



                                       2
(i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: October 30, 2008
    /s/ ALAN D. GOLDAlan D. GoldChief Executive Officer    (i)
    
    the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 (ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: October 30, 2008
    /s/ KENT GRIFFINKent GriffinChief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Michael P. HENRY v. Hon. Frank SHEA, Judge, Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Div. G, State of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0553.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Henry, Michael P.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 268790.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CHRISTIAN ALVARADO

,

APPELLANT,

V.

MARGAUX GOMEZ

,

APPELLEE. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 29 7

- CV

Appeal from the

65 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2014 DCM2033 )

§

MEMO RANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court to determine whether it should be dismissed for want of

prosecution. Finding that the Appellant ’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want

of prosecution.

On June 16 , 2015 , the Clerk notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no motion

for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to

dismiss the appeal for w ant of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and

showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1) ; T EX .R.A PP .P. 42.3

.

Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time in which to file the brief has been filed.

A ccordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.- 2

-

July 8 , 2015

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### STATE ex rel. Bryant THOMAS v. Charles C. FOTI, Sheriff, Orleans Parish.

No. 87-KH-0010.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Thomas, Bryant; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”.

Denied.
#### James H. RIVERS and Jack L. Rivers v. SUN OIL COMPANY.

No. 87-C-0648.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Sun Oil Company; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18406 CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 62656.

Prior report: La.App., 503 So.2d 1036.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Authur ELIAS.

No. 87-KK-1542.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Elias, Michael Authur; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW86 1288; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 60975.

Prior report: La.App., 509 So.2d 86.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
#### Eugene Ruben ROBINSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-352.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 5, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and D.P. Chanco, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James A. Young, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Eugene Ruben Robinson, challenges the judgment and sentence entered after he was found guilty of possession of cocaine. We reverse.

Although the appellant filed a timely written demand for discovery, the state failed to comply. On the day of trial, the appellant’s counsel filed a motion to compel discovery and/or impose sanctions. The trial court denied the motion without an adequate inquiry as to whether the discovery violation was inadvertent or willful, whether it was trivial or substantial, and whether it had a prejudicial effect on the appellant’s ability to prepare for trial as required by *Richardson v. State,*246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). The trial court’s failure to hold a *Richardson*hearing was per se reversible error. *See Smith v. State,*500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1986); *Talavera v. State,*528 So.2d 1258 (Fla.2d DCA 1988).

We, accordingly, reverse the appellant’s conviction and sentence and remand for a new trial.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and RYDER and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.14


           Schedule to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
                  of DQE for the quarter ended March 31, 1997
                                        


Severance Agreements which were substantially identical to that filed as Exhibit
10.1 were entered into with the following parties, materially differing only as
follows:



     Other Party              Material Differences
     -----------              --------------------

     Donald J. Clayton        "Severance Benefit" under Section 3a:
                               aggregate lump sum payment of $187,831.

     Gary R. Brandenberger    "Severance Benefit" under Section 3a:
                               aggregate lump sum payment of $339,339; no
                               additional lump sum amount payable if
                               terminated prior to June 30, 1999.
#### Carlos Arturo VELASQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-2565.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

Carlos Arturo Velasquez, in pro. per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

*897PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Blanco v. Wainwright,*507 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1987).
#### CURRENT BUILDERS, INC., and Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellants, v. POMPANO MASONRY CORPORATION, Appellee.

Nos. 4-86-2076, 4-86-2092.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 14, 1987.

Franklyn A. Johnson, Jr. of Smoot Johnston Johnson & Green, P.A., Fort Myers, for appellants.

Robert E. Fereneik, Jr. of Leiby and Elder, Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of change of venue and deny the petition for certiorari which addresses the trial court’s denial of abatement or stay.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 80 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on 
Thursday, February 10, 2000, or Friday, February 11, 2000, on a motion 
offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader 
or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, 
February 22, 2000, or until such time on that day as may be specified 
by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or 
adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members are notified to 
reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, 
whichever occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, February 16, 2000, Thursday, February 17, 
2000, or Friday, February 18, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to 
this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it 
stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, February 29, 2000, for 
morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day after Members are 
notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent 
resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

            Passed the Senate February 10, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                            S. CON. RES. 80

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a 
        conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.
```
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerOctober
      23, 2009
n 

'4 B m Travel I nc 

1 I 

1 •J4«(«S*' -, ,-

DEPIOFTRANSPORWION 

DOCKETS 

! P 2- 3M 

March 16, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: < 

As a dedicatedTravel parfiTerbTAmencanAtfirrrey,T am writing frrsupportx>f American'sapplication to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and 

Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. > 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and 

Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's 

largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's sti'ong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of 

business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service 

since th6 mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from 

these proposed new firghts, as "will American's customers and,employees. However, we need 

your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a realityTherefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slote to fly 

fnbm Kennedy and Los An^^eles to Haneda! 

m o S.RosdU Rd 

Schaumour^, [ L 6ol93 

630 ?8o»58oo Vacation 

630 98o-65oo Corporate 

BBsaUs@BBTravclinc*com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, I, John R.
Strangfeld, Chief Executive Officer of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, hereby certify that the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2009, containing the financial statements of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account (a separate account of The Prudential Insurance Company
of America) and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Account and The Prudential Variable Contract Real Property Partnership.



Date:March 23, 2010/s/ John R. StrangfeldJohn R. Strangfeld Chief Executive Officer The Prudential Insurance Company of
America


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.