alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS**     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 ofChapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code andshall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.     The undersigned, who are (i) the Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., thegeneral partner of United Development Funding III, L.P. (the “Partnership”) and (ii) the ChiefFinancial Officer of UMT Holdings, L.P., the limited partner of UMTH Land Development, L.P., thegeneral partner of the Partnership, each hereby certify as follows:     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the “Report”), which accompanies thisCertificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.     Dated this 29th day of June, 2006.       /s/ Todd F. Etter Todd F. Etter, Chairman of UMT Services,Inc., general partner of UMTH LandDevelopment, L.P., general partner of theRegistrant         /s/ Cara D. Obert Cara D. Obert, Chief Financial Officer ofUMT Holdings, L.P., limited partner ofUMTH Land Development, L.P., generalpartner of the Registrant  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ernest C. CROOK.

No. 88-KH-0466.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Crook, Ernest C.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-KA-0371; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 86-2004.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 1131.

Denied.
#### Barbara Jean Kerr GARDNER v. Richard J. GARDNER.

No. 88-CC-0082.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Gardner, Barbara Jean Kerr; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CW-9244; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “F”, No. 84-2289.

Denied. There is an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of adverse ruling in the district court.

LEMMON, J., concurs in the denial.
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING**

**OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, Shaun Passley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EPAZZ, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EPAZZ, Inc.

Date:  April 13, 2012

By: */s/ Shaun Passley*

Shaun Passley,

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: _____2014_____-NM-____042______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2466 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2466

To reduce temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 
                       assembled as floral stems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 
                       assembled as floral stems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS ASSEMBLED AS FLORAL 
              STEMS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Artificial flowers  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of man-made                                                        31/2011.......
                        fibers assembled
                        as floral stems
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6702.90.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 983

To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to provide

for improvements in the conspicuity of rail cars of rail carriers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 6, 1999

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Mr. DASCHLE) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to provide for improvements in the conspicuity of

rail cars of rail carriers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVED CONSPICUITY OF RAIL CARS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 20132 of title 49, United

5 States Code, is amended—

6 (1) by striking the heading and inserting the

7 following:

8 ‘‘§ 20132. Visible markers for train cars’’;

9 and
2

•S 983 IS

1 (2) by adding at the end the following:

2 ‘‘(c) IMPROVED CONSPICUITY.—Not later than 180

3 days after the date of enactment of this subsection, the

4 Secretary of Transportation shall—

5 ‘‘(1) develop and implement a plan to ensure

6 that the requirements of this section are met; and

7 ‘‘(2) issue regulations that require that, not

8 later than 2 years after the date of issuance of the

9 regulations, all cars of freight, passenger, or com10 muter trains be equipped, and, if necessary, retro11 fitted, with at least 1 highly visible marker (includ12 ing reflective tape or appropriate lighting).’’.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

14 chapter 201 of title 49, United States Code, is amended

15 by striking the item relating to section 20132 and insert16 ing the following:

‘‘20132. Visible markers for train cars.’’.

Æ
#### STATE ex rel. William SAM v. Hon. Rudolph F. BECKER, III, Judge.

No. 87-KH-0119.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Hon. Rudolph F. Becker; applying for motion for clarification of order on writ granted with order dated October 2, 1987, 512 So.2d 855, from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, No. 244-076.

Clarification granted. A trial judge’s determination to impose uniformly the most severe sanction provided by the legislature for a particular offense does not accord with the goal of individualizing sentences in Louisiana. La.C.Cr.P. art. 894.1; *State v. Jackson,*360 So.2d 842 (La.1978).. When faced with the decision of whether, to sus*123pend a life sentence for heroin distribution under the pre-1977 law, the trial judge should consider all of the circumstances of the case, including the facts of the offense, the seriousness of the crime, and the personal history of the offender. *State v. Jackson, supra.*
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 31, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00284

- CV

TERRACON CONSULTANTS, INC.

,

Appellant

v.

ROMA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

,

Appellee

From the 381st Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 14

- 289

Honorable Jose Luis Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

R e beca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

This appeal is at issue before this court. One or more of the issues pending in th is appeal

are similar to the issues in Bruington Eng’g, Ltd. v. Pedernal Energy, L.L.C. , 456 S.W.3d 181,

189

- 90 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2014, pet. granted) ( Bruington II ) , which is currently pending

before the Texas Supreme Court in Cause No. 15

- 0123

. Because the Supreme Court’s resolution

of the Bruington II appeal may have an impact on the present cause, this court has determined

that abating th is appeal pending a decision by the Supreme Court will likely achieve the greatest

judicial efficiency. Accordingly, th is appeal is ABATED. For administrative purposes, this

appeal will be treated as a closed case, unless and until appellant files a motion requesting its

reinstatement following the Texas Supreme Court’s resolution of the issue(s) in Bruington II

.

It is so ORDERED on October 31, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________________ __

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ THOMAS W. CASEY    
|Name:                  |  | Thomas W. Casey        
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY and Rex Barrett v. DYNASCAN CORPORATION and Home Insurance Company.

No. 88-C-3076.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Valley Forge Ins. Co.; Barrett, Rex; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of cer-*1255tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA87 1254; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 76401.

Denied.
#### Robert Lee WOOLSEY, Sr. v. COTTON BROTHERS BAKERY CO., INC. & Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

No. 89-C-0011.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Cotton Brothers Bakery Co.; Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.;—Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19930-CA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 87-1135.

Denied.

MARCUS, J., would grant on the issues of penalties and attorney fees.
#### Harry H. KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William FINKELSTEIN, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 136.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1939.

Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, for appellant.

Mock & Blum, of. New York City, for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion of the District Judge, 27 F.Supp. 145, on the ground of non-infringement, without passing upon the validity of the claims in suit.
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), WuSheng Liu, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




|/s/ WuSheng LiuWuSheng Liu
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: July 13, 2007
|------------------------------------------------------------------------



|
|

---
# Federal Aviation Administration
Small UAS Certificate of Registration
CERTIFICATE HOLDER: 

## Robert Oardano UAS CI!RTIFICATE NUMBER: 

## FA3EYK9CRA ISSUED: 

## 12/21/2015 EXPIRES: 

## 12/21/2018 For US. cilizM$ P"""""""' resident$ lltldcerl8innoo-dlizen US. corporations, this document comlitutes a Cerlilicare of Regslrafion. 

### For all other$ this doatmenl -enls are<:<>gnitiooofowntN$/Up. For allholden, for 

# •« operations otherthilfl asa modelaircraft undenec. 316 of Pub. L. 112·

### !J!i Bdditiooill safely authority from FM lltld economic authority from DOT

mayberequired S.felyguidellne•lorflylngyour........,nedaircr..!t: • Ay 

### below 400 

### feet • Neller fly over stadiums, sports 

### • Never fly 

### near other aircraft events or groups 

### of people • Keep your UAS within visual line • Never fly under the influence of

of 

### sight 

### drugs or alcohol • Keep away from emergency • 

### Neller fly within 5 miles of 

### an

responders airport without first contacting air 'IJ'affic control and airport authorilies 

# D--f ;:[

# P~ 

# 11Jo M

# R~~**tsf~tAfJOY\**

https: 

# 1 {reg istermyuas. faa .gov /restricted#/certificate 

# 12/21/'15, 10:35 PM Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1





DelawarePAGE 1


The First State


I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THESTATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THEATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THECERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF "MAGNUM HUNTERRESOURCES CORPORATION", FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST, A.D. 2010, AT 10:56 O'CLOCK A.M.
  A FILED COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO THENEW CASTLE COUNTYRECORDER OF DEEDS.
         2758331 8100



100803652

Jeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary of State



AUTHENTICATION: 8157821



DATE: 08-06-10
    
  1
 
  State of Delaware
 Secretary of State
 Division of Corporations
 Delivered 10:56 Ad 08/05/2010
 FILED 10:56 AM 08/05/2010
 SRV 100803652 — 2758331 FILE
 
 MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION
  CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
  CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION OF RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES
  10.25% SERIES C CUMULATIVE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK
  (Pursuant to Section242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)
  Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation, acorporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, in accordance with Section 242of the Delaware General Corporation Law, does hereby certify that:
  1.  The name ofthe corporation is Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (formerly known as Petro Resources Corporation and Kid Critter U.S.A., Inc., the "Corporation").
  2.  Theoriginal Certificate of incorporation (Aft Corporation was filed with theSecretary ofState of the State of Delaware on June 4, 1997.
  3.  The original Certificate of Designation of Rights and Preferences of the 10.25% Series C Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock forthe Corporation was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on December 10, 2009 (the "Certificate of Designation").
  4.  Pursuant to the authority conferred upon the holders of Series C Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock by the Certificate of Designation, and pursuant to the applicable provisionsof the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, said stockholders adopted the following amendment to the Certificate of Designation by therequisite vote at a duly called meeting of the holders of 10.25% Series C CumulativePerpetual Preferred Stock amending the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of, and the number of shares comprising,theCorporation's 10.25% Series C Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock as follows:
  Section 1 of the Certificate of Designation ishereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:
  Section 1. Numberof Shares and Designation. This series of Preferred Stock shall be designated as 10.25% Series C Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the ''SeriesC Preferred Shares"), and the number of shares that shall constitute such series shall be 4,000,000.
  [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]
   2
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to the Certificate of Designationto be duly executed andacknowledged by Gary C. Evans its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as of this 2nd dayofAugust, 2010.
 
 
 
 MAGNUMHUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION
  /s/ Gary C. Evans
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7094** 

AUSTIN KERR BRAME , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WENDELL W. PIXLEY, Warden, St. Brides Correctional Center , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:11

- cv - 00564

- RAJ

- FBS )

Submitted : September 11, 2012 Decided: September 18, 2012

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Austin Kerr Brame, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Austin Kerr Brame seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this st andard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brame has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argume nt because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Notes from Meeting with 

American Health Care Association & National Center for Assisted Living

Attended by:

AHCA Staff: Sandra Fitzler, Teresa Cagnolatti, Elise Smith

NCAL Staff: Shelley Sabo, Karl Polzer

EPA Staff: Charlotte Mooney, Jessica Young, Kristin Fitzgerald, and Lisa Lauer

Date: March 23, 2011

EPA met with representatives from the American Health Care Association and the National 

Center for Assisted Living. The AHCA and NCAL discussed the types of patients, operations, 

staffing, funding, and management of the different types of long term care facilities.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00253

- CR
Jesus Miguel Villarreal v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 0275

- 17

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 28, 2018
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      November 13, 2009
              By:
              /s/He ZhiweiName:
              He
      ZhiweiTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be
retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to
his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Bank of Wilmington Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                    |  |                                                      |  | 
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:  May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ Cameron Coburn                                   |  | 
|                    |  | Cameron Coburn President and Chief Executive Officer |  |