alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2339 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2339

           To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Nitrophenol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Nitrophenol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-NITROPHENOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       2-Nitrophenol       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (Ortho-Nitro-                                                      31/2011.......
                          Phenol) (CAS No.
                          88-75-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2908.99.25)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
((

## £/et/t: Mtl Hcerk/ Cowct or Cr'^^l 

### p6 $o>c 1230% C<\pt7o( j-ftfrfh /tusk* I*fly y^j/, 7-20'2air se-iVCr ^wms> •WLgygffi rs fill , iJ / yMffite 

## f0,n :CH> S"p /£C'D /fa»</*1* F'"« cc* /jtfw* 'fa Apr*** °» ChMs- 

# #0,7-1*,-/' >•*> ^ *£'#**>•

00 7- ///* "/> e>l tJ>

[fallcPr<^ Ctt/»2 f/t
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 2, 2014

No. 04-14-00207-CV

Peter BARTON,

Appellant

v.

Ana Lisa GARZA,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-12-308

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief 

is due on July 18, 2014.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1818]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Economic and Industrial Development Commission of Windsor Locks, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 71, submitted an application to the Board for authority to expand FTZ 71 to include a site in East Granby/Windsor, Connecticut, within the Hartford Customs and Border Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 47-2011, filed 7/5/2011);                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (76 FR 40688-40689, 7/11/2011) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to expand FTZ 71 is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

      ( print page 15357)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of February 2012.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-6300 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2328 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain untwisted filament 

yarns. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

untwisted filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN UNTWISTED FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.91 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain untwisted filament yarns) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2328 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2410 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2410

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, 
            N, N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, 
            N, N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-BENZENEDICARBOXAMIDE, N, N'-BIS-(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4-
              PIPERIDINYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,3-Benzenedicarboxamide, N, 
N'-bis-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### WHITE OAK, INC. v. KATZ & SIMONE, Stephen J. Simone, and First National Bank of Jefferson Parish.

No. CA/87/0803.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 14, 1987.

James G. Wyly, III and Patrick Berrigan, Slidell, for plaintiff, appellee.

Darryl J. Foster and Paul B. Deal, New Orleans, for defendant, appellant.

Before GROVER L. COVINGTON, C.J., and SAVOIE and LeBLANC, JJ.

GROVER L. COVINGTON, Chief Judge.

Appellee has filed this motion to dismiss, arguing the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment which is non-appealable absent a showing of irreparable injury.

White Oak, Inc. has filed suit against Katz and Simone (a professional law corporation), Stephen J. Simone, and First National Bank of Jefferson Parish. Defendants 1 filed an exception raising the objection of improper venue. After a hearing the trial court rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff denying the exception. Defendants then filed a motion and order for appeal contending they would suffer irreparable harm unless allowed to appeal. Plaintiff has filed this motion to dismiss.

Code of Civil Procedure art. 2083 provides that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory judgment which may cause irreparable injury. The standard for *477determining whether an interlocutory judgment may cause irreparable injury is whether any error in the judgment may be corrected as a practical matter in an appeal following a determination of the merits. *Cheramie v. Vegas,*385 So.2d 453 (La.App. 1st Cir.1980). A judgment denying an objection of improper venue is one that causes irreparable injury since the appellate court has no practical means of correcting the error on appeal after a trial on the merits. *Herlitz Construction Company, Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc.,*396 So.2d 878, footnote 1 (La.1981); *Greater Lafourche Port Commission v. Louisiana State Civil Service Commission,*481 So.2d 745 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985).

For the above reasons, the motion to dismiss is denied at mover’s cost.

DENIED.

1

. Only defendants Stephen Simone and Katz & Simone filed the exception of improper venue.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                                          80,076
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  319,552
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (168,575)
<INVENTORY>                                                     80,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               522,959
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 522,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        4,271,515
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                  1,215,093
<COMMON>                                                       112,232
<OTHER-SE>                                                 (5,075,881)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   522,959
<SALES>                                                      9,216,122
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             9,219,555
<CGS>                                                        3,138,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               10,024,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             7,349,195
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                37,175
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             380,294
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (7,777,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (7,777,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (7,777,603)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (1.10)


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2019

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2019

154158

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154158

COA: 332838

Livingston CC: 15-022793-FC

JOSEPH MICHAEL KUZMA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 29, 2018, the application for leave to appeal the June 22, 2016 

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Ames (Docket No. 156077). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in 

Ames on June 26, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it 

is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be 

reviewed by this Court.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lawrence DANGERFIELD.

No. 87-K-2424.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Dangerfield, Lawrence; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KA-4871; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 280-900.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 1239.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Billy Charles SMITH.

No. 86-K-2101.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Smith, Billy Charles; applying for writ of review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 17945-KA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 42186.

Prior report: La.App., 495 So.2d 1021.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2393 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2393

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-
          b']difuran-2,6-dione, 3-phenyl-7-(4-propoxyphenyl)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-
          b']difuran-2,6-dione, 3-phenyl-7-(4-propoxyphenyl)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZO[1,2-B:4,5-B']DIFURAN-2,6-DIONE, 3-PHENYL-7-(4-
              PROPOXYPHENYL)-.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.97 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']difuran-
2,6-dione, 3-phenyl-7-(4-propoxyphenyl)-) is amended by striking ``12/
31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2045 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cetalox. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cetalox. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CETALOX. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3a,6,6,9a-Tetramethyl2,4,5,5a,7,8,9,9b-octahydro1H-benzo[e][1]benzofuran 

(Amber naphthofuran) (CAS 

No. 3738–00–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

2932.99.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2045 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### National Institute of Corrections

*Time and Date:*                     8 AM-4:30 PM on Monday, April 02, 2012; 8 AM-12 PM on Tuesday, April 03, 2012.                

*Place:*                     Federal Bureau of Prisons, 500 First Street, NW., Washington, DC 20534, (202) 514-4222.                

*Matters To Be Considered:*                     Directors report; review of outcomes of November 2-3, 2011 Advisory Board Hearing (Shifting the Focus to Reshape Our Thinking Toward Performance Based Outcomes), presentations, future planning.                

*Contact Person For More Information:*                     Thomas Beauclair, Deputy Director, (202) 307-3106, extension 44254.                

Morris L. Thigpen, Sr.,

Director, National Institute of Corrections.

[FR Doc. 2012-5682 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical Services Corporation, as general partner of Emergency
Medical Services L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William A. SangerWilliam A. SangerChief Executive Officer Emergency Medical Services Corporation,as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. May 11, 2006




/s/ Randel G. OwenRandel G. OwenChief Financial Officer Emergency Medical Services Corporation,as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. May 11, 2006
#### H. C. JONES, Collector of Internal Revenue. v. KINGKADE HOTEL COMPANY, a Corporation.

No. 2025.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 4, 1939.

George H. McElroy, Asst. U., S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.

Richard A. Billups, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellee.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal, 30 F.Supp. 508, dismissed pursuant to stipulation.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A as filed on May 1, 2007 ofInvestors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) amending our Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed on February 27, 2007(the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.                The Report, asamended by this Amendment No. 2, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report, as amended by this Amendment No. 2, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ KEVIN J. SHEEHAN      |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Kevin J. Sheehan          |   |   |
| *Chairman and*            |   |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |

 

May 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. andwill be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

In connection withthe Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A as filed on May 1, 2007 ofInvestors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) amending our Report on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed on February 27, 2007(the “Report”), I, John N. Spinney, Jr., Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

1.                The Report, asamended by this Amendment No. 2, fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report, as amended by this Amendment No. 2, fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.
| /s/ JOHN N. SPINNEY, JR.    |   |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
| *Senior Vice President and* |   |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*   |   |   |

 

May 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. andwill be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----