alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April
                23, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
                M. CancioHugo
                M. CancioTitle:
                Principal Executive Officer
50276.

#### CITIZENS & SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK et al. v. MILLER et al.

Webb, Judge.

Miller, Beckmann & Simpson, a partnership law firm, brought suit against The Citizens & Southern National Bank and Joseph C. Saffold, co-executors under the will of Thomas P. Saffold, seeking to recover for legal services rendered the estate. The trial court granted summary judgment to plaintiffs in the total amount of $24,423.11, and the executors filed their notice of appeal from this judgment. Various disputes arose or continued between the co-executors and, subsequent to the case being docketed in this court, a hearing was held in the probate court resulting in an order, inter alia, that "the executors shall borrow an amount sufficient to satisfy the claim of Miller, Beckmann and Simpson up to $17,500.” Pursuant to this order, the money was borrowed and paid to the law firm and the present case has been marked "settled, satisfied and dismissed” in the court below.

Under the circumstances this appeal must be dismissed as moot in accordance with the motion to dismiss filed by the co-executor bank. If co-executor Saffold has further quarrel with the other executor, the law firm, or the order of the probate court, those matters must be pursued in other proceedings since the instant dispute has been concluded.

*Appeal dismissed.*

*Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.*

*236Submitted March 3, 1975

Decided March 10, 1975.

*Adams, Adams, Brennan & Gardner, M. Lane Morrison, Jack E. Miller,*for appellants.

*John M. Tatum,*for appellees.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Susan Beavers, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Alfred Kleiman, J.), rendered August 16, 1988, convicting defendant, upon a jury verdict, of attempted grand larceny in the third degree, burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, and sentencing her, as a predicate felon, to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of one and one-half to three years on the attempted grand larceny count and to two to four years on the remaining counts, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was indicted after she tricked a security guard at the offices of her former employer into letting her into the building where she used a FAX machine to send the employer’s bank a forged "wire transfer letter” instructing it to transfer $7500 from one of its accounts into her own personal checking account.

In a pretrial *Sandoval*ruling, the trial court determined that the prosecutor, *inter alia,*could question defendant about her accumulation of 44 parking tickets in two years for which she had not paid the fines. Defendant contends that permitting inquiry into her unpaid parking tickets violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 155. We disagree.

Initially, we note that since defendant failed to challenge the ruling on this basis in the trial court, the matter has not been preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Claudio,*64 NY2d 858). In any event, although Vehicle and Traffic Law § 155 provides that "[a] traffic infraction is not a crime * * * and shall not affect or impair the credibility as a witness or otherwise of any person convicted thereof’, the statute does not preclude inquiry into the consistent failure to *349pay fines imposed on traffic tickets. Defendant’s pattern of failing to pay the parking tickets was relevant to a determination of her credibility, particularly her willingness to place her own interests above those of society *(People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371). The probative worth of the evidence was not outweighed by any possible prejudice to defendant. In light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, any possible error in this regard also would have "paled into harmlessness” *(People v Shields,*46 NY2d 764, 765; *People v Jones,*158 AD2d 346, *lv denied*76 NY2d 737). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Kupferman, Ross and Smith, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2462 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2462

 To suspend temporarily the duty on electric pneumatic airsoft rifles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on electric pneumatic airsoft rifles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTRIC PNEUMATIC AIRSOFT RIFLES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Low energy air      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          guns (ASTM F                                                       31/2011.......
                          2654) operated by
                          pneumatic
                          pressure created
                          by an electrical
                          air pump
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9304.00.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE:

JAMES EDWARD HILLIARD. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00179

- CR

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190D00815 and 20220D02996)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 21 ST DAY OF JULY, 2023.

G INA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-3735

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

James Allen Crippen

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Joplin

____________

 Submitted: June 26, 2017

Filed: June 30, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

After the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence, James Allen 1

Crippen pleaded guilty to child-pornography offenses and was sentenced below the

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri.
advisory Guidelines range. On appeal, Crippen’s counsel has moved to withdraw,

and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

denial of the suppression motion. Crippen’s unconditional guilty plea, however, 

forecloses our review of the suppression ruling. See United States v. Christenson,

653 F.3d 697, 699 (8th Cir. 2011). Further, having independently reviewed the

record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for

appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2345 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2345

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyoxyacetic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on methyoxyacetic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYOXYACETIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to methyoxyacetic acid) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.3

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Peter J. Leveton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this 10-K/A Report of Zynex Medical Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Dated:  June 16, 2005

/s/  Peter J. Leveton
Peter J. Leveton
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0574

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

Defendant and Appellant. 

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until March 9, 2022, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 7 2022

02/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0574
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2177 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Lewatit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Lewatit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEWATIT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.71 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2102 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain electric motor controllers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain electric motor 

controllers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC MOTOR CONTROLLERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2102 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Electric motor controllers 

(provided for in subheading 

9032.89.60), certified by the 

importer to control the electric motors that power electric vehicles of subheading 

8703.90 in which an on 

board gasoline engine is used 

to run a generator that recharges the electric drive 

motor battery ........................ .81% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE01772

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
#### Curtis L. HAMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. BL-258, BL-413.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 20, 1987.

Curtis L. Hampton, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

SHIVERS, Judge.

The appellant in this case, Curtis L. Hampton, filed a motion for post-conviction relief on December 12, 1985, raising four grounds: (1) that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered; (2) that the trial court erred in failing to order a competency hearing; (8) that his conviction was obtained by use of a coerced confession; and (4) ineffective assistance of counsel through (a) failure to raise voluntary intoxication defense, (b) failure to explain to defendant the nature of a nolo contendere plea, (c) failure to inform defendant that his constitutional rights had been violated, and (d) failure to move the court for a competency hearing. The trial court summarily denied the motion, stating that appellant had raised the same grounds in a previous motion for post-conviction relief, which was denied by the trial court in 1981. Appellant appealed the denial of the 1985 motion to this court, alleging that he did not recall filing the previous motion.

We released an opinion on October 14, 1986 noting that, according to Rule 3.850, a second or successive motion for post-conviction relief may be dismissed if the trial court finds that it fails to allege any new or different grounds *and*if the prior determination was made on the merits. Since we were unable to determine either of these points from the record, we reversed and remanded for the trial court to attach the portion of the record and files conclusively showing appellant to be entitled to no relief. *Hampton v. State,*495 So.2d 903 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

The trial court has responded to our opinion by providing us with a copy of the previous motion and of the order denying that motion. Since it is apparent both that the 1985 motion contains issues which were not raised in the previous motion, and that the previous motion was not denied on its merits, we reverse the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s 1985 motion for post-conviction relief and remand for further proceedings consistent with Rule 3.850.

SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 22, 2012 at 1 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Gallagher, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 22, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: March 15, 2012.

Lynn Powalski, 

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-6766 Filed 3-16-12; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### STATE ex rel. Van Raymond FRAISE v. Sheriff Charles C. FOTI, Jr.

No. 86-KH-2438.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Fraise, Van Raymond; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 300-553.

Denied. No transcript attached to support application. See C.Cr.P. art. 930.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2322 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2322

           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4-
                        Ethylenedioxythiophene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Kirk, and Mr. Graham) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4-
                        Ethylenedioxythiophene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,4-ETHYLENEDIOXYTHIOPHENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```