alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark M. Laisure, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                                                                                                           | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                                                                                                           | 
| | /s/ Mark M. Laisure                                                                                                                      
| | Mark M. Laisure                                                                                                                          
| | Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
| | April 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) of North American Insurance Leaders, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paula S. Butler, Executive Vice President, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Paula S. Butler          
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President     
|                        |  |  |  | (principal financial officer)
----

**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C.**

**FORM 10-KSB**

[ X ]	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE        ACTOF 1934

	For the fiscal year ended  **December 31, 2000**

[    ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES                    EXCHANGEACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from  to .

Commission File No.  **33-26787-D**

**iBonZai.com, Inc.**(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
#### STATE ex rel. Byron L. LUCAS v. Hilton BUTLER, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0916.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Lucas, Byron L.; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or ha-beas corpus; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 87-643210.

Denied.
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph LOSINSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 83CA1266.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. I.

July 18, 1985.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15, 1985.

Certiorari Denied Dec. 2, 1985.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Robert M. Petrusak, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-ap-pellee.

Carpenter & Johnson, P.C., William L. Carpenter, Lakewood, for defendant-appellant.

PIERCE, Judge.

Defendant, Joseph Losinski, appeals his conviction of first degree perjury under § 18-8-502, C.R.S. (1978 Repl.Vol. 8). We affirm.

The sole issue on appeal is whether § 18-8-506, C.R.S. (1984 Cum.Supp.) was *1164complied with in the prosecution of this case. We rule that it was.

That statute, in pertinent part, states as follows:

> “In any prosecution for perjury or false swearing ... falsity of a statement may not be established solely through contradiction by the uncorroborated testimony of a single witness.”

It was established at trial that Losinski had visited witness Van Hook at Van Hook’s home, and had given Van Hook $100 to apply on damages due from Losin-ski to the Van Hook family as a result of an automobile accident. Witness Van Hook gave Losinski a receipt for the $100. At a civil trial which arose as the result of the automobile accident, Losinski testified that he had paid Van Hook $900 and produced a receipt for $900. This testimony and the receipt form the basis for the perjury prosecution.

At the perjury trial, Van Hook testified as to the events which took place at his home and also as to Losinski’s alleged false testimony at the civil trial. The $900 receipt was also placed in evidence, and it was established that Losinski had presented it in the civil trial. Expert testimony established that the $900 receipt was a false document which was made by altering and then photocopying the $100 receipt which had been prepared by Van Hook.

This testimony, although contradicted by other testimony, was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the statute that one witness and independent corroborating evidence are sufficient to establish the basis for a perjury charge. *See Marrs v. People,*135 Colo. 458, 312 P.2d 505 (1957); *People v. Mazza,*182 Colo. 166, 511 P.2d 885 (1973).

The judgment is affirmed.

VAN CISE and STERNBERG, JJ„ concur.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07518 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### x 07518\07518_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 07518\07518_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### x 07518\07518_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07518\07518_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07518\07518_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07518\07518_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07518\07518_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 07518\Certification Statement Plant ID 07518.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Bottom Ash PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Deadline Extension Approval.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Hanford aerial map.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_S8_Water Discharge Sketch_091509.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 07518\Supplemental Documents\Hanford PP ID-07518 FLY ASH PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 21



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        Subsidiaries of Carolina First BancShares, Inc.  Jurisdiction of
        -----------------------------------------------  ---------------
                                                         Incorporation
                                                         ---------------
        <S>                                              <C>

        Cabarrus Bank of North Carolina                  North Carolina
         Concord, North Carolina

        Carolina First Mortgage Corp.                    North Carolina
         Mooresville, North Carolina

        Carolina First Financial Services Corp.          North Carolina
         Mooresville, North Carolina

        Lincoln Bank of North Carolina, Inc.             North Carolina
         Lincolnton, North Carolina

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Gary J. Bench, certify that: 

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CNX Gas Corporation; 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

(4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange of Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed underour supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with in those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a. All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 2, 2006
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56933) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Stock
Purchase Plan-1991;
 (2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-87897) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Stock
Purchase Plan-1991, 1995 Stock Option Plan for Directors, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and
1999 Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan;
 (3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49892) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1999 Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan;
 (4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56704) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust;
 (5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135697) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan;
 (6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144552) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., #2007 Performance Incentive Plan and 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and
Trust;
 (7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-153206) pertaining to the OncoGenex
Technologies, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan;
 (8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-128030) pertaining to the registration for resale of
 shares of common stock of OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus;
 (9)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-160251) pertaining to the registration of shares of
common stock of OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus;
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Edward BUTLER, Jr.

No. 87-KH-0802.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Butler, Edward Jr.; applying for writ of mandamus, prohibition and habeas corpus; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 83-2304.

Granted and transferred to 24th Judicial District Court for prompt implementation of its order of June 28, 1985.
**Exhibit 13.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,**

**CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

                Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DRAXIS Health Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

                The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Dated: March 31, 2008 |   |   |   |                    |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                       |   |   |   |                    |
|   |                       |   |   |   | /s/ Mark Oleksiw        |
|   |                       |   |   |   | Mark Oleksiw            |
|   |                       |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                       |   |   |   |                    |
|   |                       |   |   |   |                    |

 

                    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 151

To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 2348.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 13 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) submitted the following

concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

To make a correction in the enrollment of the bill H.R.

2348.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 2348)

3 entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the Bureau of Reclamation

4 to provide cost sharing for the endangered fish recovery

5 implementation programs for the Upper Colorado and San

6 Juan River Basins.’’, the Clerk of the House of Represent7 atives shall make the following correction: Strike section

8 4 and insert:
2

SCON 151 ATS

1 ‘‘SEC. 4. EFFECT ON RECLAMATION LAW.

2 ‘‘Specifically with regard to the acreage limitation

3 provisions of Federal reclamation law, any action taken

4 pursuant to or in furtherance of this title will not—

5 ‘‘(1) be considered in determining whether a

6 district as defined in section 202(2) of the Reclama7 tion Reform Act of 1982 (43 U.S.C. 390bb) has dis8 charged its obligation to repay the construction cost

9 of project facilities used to make irrigation water

10 available for delivery to land in the district;

11 ‘‘(2) serve as the basis for reinstating acreage

12 limitation provisions in a district that has completed

13 payment of its construction obligations; or

14 ‘‘(3) serve as the basis for increasing the con15 struction repayment obligation of the district and

16 thereby extending the period during which the acre17 age limitation provisions will apply.’’.

Æ
#### SAYBROOK BANK AND TRUST COMPANY *v.*JOHN T. O’REILLY ET AL.

*John T. O’Reilly,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided February 18, 1998

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 922 (AC 16986), is denied.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 2, 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00476

- CV

IN RE A.C. , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 246th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020

- 05628



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 28, 2022 , relator A.C. filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this

court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Angela L. Graves

Harrington, presiding judge of the 246th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside her June 22, 2022 order denying relator’s emergency motion for extension of discovery p eriod and for temporary support

.2

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s amended emergency motion to stay.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
#### Grace W. Savage, Respondent, *v.*Daniel J. Sully, Appellant.

*Savage*v. *Sully,*168 App. Div. 131, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted February 22, 1916;

decided March 7, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 21, 1915, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a permanent injunction to restrain the plaintiff, judgment creditor, from issuing a second execution against the person of the defendant, judgment debtor, after the body of the judgment debtor had been taken in execution by the sheriff and thereafter released upon a written instruction from the judgment creditor *677given upon the judgment debtor’s payment of a certain part of the judgment debt and his agreeing to pay the balance in monthly installments. The judgment debtor having failed to make the agreed payments he was threatened with arrest under the old or a new execution against his person.

*John J. Jordan*for appellant.

*Walter L. Bunnell*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs, on the ground that it is not from a final order; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
#### Michael MADRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1806.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 6, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 14, 1988.

Michael Madry, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Deborah Guller, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Madry was convicted in a trial by jury of a number of felonies and sentenced.

Madry then filed a motion for post conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 alleging ineffectiveness of trial counsel. This motion was summarily denied without an evidentiary *919hearing. Madry appeals. We reverse and remand with instructions to conduct an evi-dentiary hearing upon Madry’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Madry’s motion for post-conviction relief was based on these grounds:

> 1. Trial counsel refused to allow appellant to testify on his own behalf in his defense.

> 2. Trial counsel told appellant he had no right to represent himself.

> 3. Trial counsel failed to move to dismiss the “invalid” information (appellant claims that the Assistant State Attorney had no authority to sign said information, thus making it invalid).

> 4. The trial counsel failed to object to an all-white jury.

In our opinion sufficient grounds were presented as to merit an evidentiary hearing. Moreover, the State’s response did not meet or refute Madry’s allegations and there were no attachments to the denial order showing that Madry was entitled to no relief.

We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

LETTS, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
# Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Bremer
Financial Corporation

Name  of Subsidiaries and State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation as of 
March 22, 2006:

State of Minnesota:

| | Bremer
Business Finance CorporationBremer Financial Services, Inc.Bremer Insurance Agencies,
Inc.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State of Connecticut:

| | Bremer
Statutory Trust I
| | ------------------------

State of Delaware:

| | Bremer
Capital Trust I
| | ----------------------

State of Arizona:

| | Bremer
Life Insurance Company
| | -----------------------------

United States (National Bank Act):

| | Bremer
Bank, National Association (Alexandria, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Brainerd,
MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Fargo, ND)
Bremer Bank, National Association
(Grand Forks, ND)
Bremer Bank, National Association (International Falls, MN)
Bremer
Bank, National Association (Menomonie, WI)
Bremer Bank, National Association (St. Cloud,
MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (South Saint Paul, MN)
Bremer Bank, National
Association (Willmar, MN)
Bremer Trust, National Association
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---