alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PROMISSORY NOTE TO FREZER INC.

FROM BIO-MATRIX SCIENTIFIC GROUP INC.





FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned promise to pay the order of Frezer Inc., the sum of fourteen  thousand and no/100ths US Dollars ($14,000), together with interest thereon at the rate of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.



Said principal and interest shall be payable as follows:



1.  Principle is due December 30, 2006 and is Payable US Dollars and / or securities acceptable to Frezer's Board of Directors,



2.  Interest is due semi-annually from the date of the execution of this agreement and is payable in US Dollars and / or securities acceptable to Frezer's Board of Directors,



3.  This note may be called, extended or modified by approval of the Board of Directors of Frezer Inc., with thirty days (30 days) written notice to borrower.



4.  There is no pre-payment penalty should borrower decide to pay note off before the stated maturity date. Interest shall be calculated on a pro rata basis should note be paid off prior to maturity.



The undersigned may prepay this Note in whole or in part without penalty. In the event any payment due hereunder is not paid when due, the entire balance shall be immediately due and payable upon demand of the holder. Upon default, the undersigned shall pay all reasonable attorney fees and costs necessary for the collection of this Note,



This Note is executed to evidence an existing indebtedness due the payee from the undersigned on an open account balance as of this date, and this Note shall not be construed as a separate obligation.



Signed in agreement this 3d day of February,  2006,



BIO-MATRIX SCIENTIFIC GROUP INC.



(Borrower's name)



/s/David Koos

Borrowers  Signature
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.57



                                                                  March 11, 1998

Mr. Francis S. (Kit) Webster III
ROSS Technology, Inc.
5316 Highway 290 West, Suite 500
Austin, Texas 78735

         Re:      Employment Letter Agreement

Dear Kit:

         I am please to inform you that the Human Resources Committee of the
Board of Directors of the Company has approved the following amendment to your
employment letter agreement with the Company dated April 1, 1997:

         1. In the event that you experience a termination without cause from
the Company, the Company agrees to pay your salary for a period of twelve months
(rather than six months as specified in the April 1, 1997 employment letter)
following the date of your termination. These amounts will not be subject to
offset or reduction for any amounts which you earn or could have earned during
the same period.

         2. In the event of the occurrence of a Major Event (as defined in the
Company's Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan 3.0, as amended) which
results in the Company ceasing to be a public company, then you may voluntarily
terminate your employment and receive the severance payments set forth in
paragraph 1. However, unless the Company otherwise agrees in writing, to be
eligible to voluntarily terminate your employment and receive severance
payments, you must wait at least thirty (30) days (but not more than ninety (90)
days) after the transaction is consummated before you voluntarily terminate your
employment.

         3. In the event of the occurrence of a Major Event, any of the options
to purchase the Company's common stock which you have been granted under that
plan prior to the date of this letter shall immediately vest and become
exercisable in full.

         I have enclosed two copies of this letter. If the foregoing amendment
to your April 1, 1997 employment letter agreement is acceptable to you, please
sign both copies of this letter and return one copy to me. Once you sign and
return this letter, your April 1, 1997 letter agreement, as amended by this
letter, will constitute the entire agreement between you and the Company
concerning the terms of your employment.


                                           Very truly yours,



                                           Jack W. Simpson
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President




                                        1
<PAGE>   2




I agree to the amendment to my April 1, 1997 letter agreement As set forth in
this letter.



----------------------------------
Francis S. (Kit) Webster III

----------------------------------
Date


                                       2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Capital Return
                    Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<CIK>               0000846176
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Capital Return Futures Fund
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          2,746,277

<SECURITIES>                    8,894,815

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                11,641,092

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,641,092

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           447,870

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      11,193,222

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,641,092

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                321,395

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,771,534

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,450,139)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (15.31)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3342-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]


Connecticut; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
State of Connecticut (FEMA-3342-EM), dated October 31, 2011, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 29, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this emergency.
This action terminates the appointment of Stephen M. DeBlasio Sr. as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this emergency.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-6357 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Paula Yvette AROCHA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-30319.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*108Submitted May 12, 2003.*

Decided May 20, 2003.

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Paula Yvette Arocha appeals the 30-month sentence imposed following her guilty plea conviction for assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s decision not to grant a downward departure for mitigating circumstances because there is no indication in the record that the district court believed it lacked discretion to depart downward. *See United States v. Romero,*293 F.3d 1120, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2002).

There is no support for Arocha’s contention that her childhood circumstances were “extraordinary,” and that therefore this court should review the district court’s factual findings in determining its decision not to depart downward. *Cf. United States v. Roe,*976 F.2d 1216, 1218 (9th Cir.1992) (remanded to reconsider downward departure where district court clearly erred in finding that defendant’s history of “extreme” childhood sexual and physical abuse was not extraordinary); *cf. United States v. Walter,*256 F.3d 891, 894 (9th Cir.2001) (same).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 8, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40063 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ARNOLDO ALMAGUER-CONTRERAS, also known as Armando Garcia-Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-733-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, GARWOOD, and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Arnoldo AlmaguerContreras raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
Order entered May 1, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-20-00409-CV

IN RE BEST INTEREST AND PRO TECTION OF E.P., Relator

Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MI-20-00463

ORDER
Before Chief Justice Burns and Justices Molberg and Evans

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s March 30,

2020 petition for writ of habeas corpus.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
#### H. H. Buckman, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Little Brothers Fertilizer & Phosphate Company, Limited, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc.,*

June 21, 1905.)

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Duval County; Chas. S. Adams, Referee.

*H. 3. Buclcman,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Wm>. B. Young*and *D. U. Fletcher,*for Defendant in Error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Dismissed on agreement of counsel for the respective parties.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Clinical Assay Development Program (CADP), April 10, 2012, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room C, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 29, 2012, 77 FR 12318.                

The meeting has been cancelled.

Dated: March 12, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-6596 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1823 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2009 

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.35 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain footwear) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1823 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Scott CONWELL, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

Case No. 87-2834.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 17, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1988.

*921Ernest M. Jones, Jr., Lakeland, for appellant.

Gary W. Sawyer and Daniel F. Pilka of Sawyer and Pilka, P.A., Tampa, for appel-lee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment denying plaintiff PIP coverage.

Plaintiff was working for a sign company which owned a flatbed truck to which was permanently affixed a hydraulic ladder. He and a sign were lifted up the hydraulic ladder in connection with the installation of the sign. As he was standing on the ladder holding the sign in place against a portion of the wall where the sign was to be affixed, a gust of wind knocked him off the ladder onto the ground, injuring him. The truck was stationary at the time of the accident.

Plaintiff contends that PIP coverage was required because his loss was from injuries “arising out of the ... use of a motor vehicle” within the meaning of section 627.-736(1), Florida Statutes (1985), “while occupying the owner’s motor vehicle” within the meaning of section 627.736(4)(d)4. We agree. Notwithstanding the well-presented argument on behalf of appellee, we conclude that the legislature meant to require PIP coverage pursuant to those provisions under circumstances like those in this case.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and LEHAN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Scientific, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, L. Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
January 24, 2003

|By: |  | /s/ L. Michael CutrerL. Michael Cutrer
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | the Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | the
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                          |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Gui Hua
 Lan                                          |  | 
|                                                          |  | 
|Name: Gui
 Hua Lan                                        |  | 
|Title: Chief
 Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|                                                          |  | 
|/s/
 Chuanxiang Huang                                     |  | 
|                                                          |  | 
|Name:
 Chuanxiang Huang                                   |  | 
|Title: Chief
 Financial Officer                           |  | 

November 16,
2009

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China
Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
#### Francisco GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-2114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Francisco Garcia, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eddie J. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for an evidentia-ry hearing on the authority of *Rodriguez v. State,*487 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

DOWNEY, ANSTEAD, and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
# L_2007048EN.01000301.xml

| 16.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/3

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1463/2006 of 19 June 2006 adapting Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) by reason of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 277 of 9 October 2006
  )

| 1. | On page 1, the following recital 4a shall be inserted: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 1, the following recital 4a shall be inserted:

| ‘(4a) | With a view to granting Bulgaria and Romania the same benefits as the Member States which acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 in relation to the maximum intensity of aid for investments undertaken to meet the requirements of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (2), Bulgaria and Romania should be added to the list of countries benefiting from the maximum rate of 75 %. |
| --- | --- |

‘(4a)

With a view to granting Bulgaria and Romania the same benefits as the Member States which acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004 in relation to the maximum intensity of aid for investments undertaken to meet the requirements of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (2), Bulgaria and Romania should be added to the list of countries benefiting from the maximum rate of 75 %.

| 2. | On page 1, in Article 1, the following point 3 shall be added: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 1, in Article 1, the following point 3 shall be added:

‘3.   In the fourth column of the Annex, in the rows relating to Article 26(2), the sixth paragraph shall be replaced by the following:

“Of the amount of eligible investment in the Member States which acceded to the Community on 1 May 2004, and in Bulgaria and Romania, for the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC (1) within a maximum period of four years from the date of accession pursuant to Articles 3(2) and 5(1) of that Directive.”
  ’

---

(2)  
  OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1. Directive as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p. 1).’;

2

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2374 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microwave oven and range hood 

combinations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain microwave oven 

and range hood combinations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MICROWAVE OVEN AND RANGE HOOD 

4 COMBINATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Microwave oven and range 

hood combinations with oven 

capacity exceeding 45.0 liters 

(provided for in subheading 

8516.50.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2374 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS