alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6272]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-480-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: 2012 Period Two Correction to be effective 5/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20120308-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/12.

    Docket Numbers: RP12-481-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Negotiated Rate Amendment--Wisconsin Electric to be 
effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20120308-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/20/12.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-458-001.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Amendment of RP12-458 General Terms and Conditions to 
be effective 4/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 3/8/12.
    Accession Number: 20120308-5132.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/13/12.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment 
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at: 
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other 
information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated: March 9, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6272 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughery, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-2892

___________

Linda L. Leonard, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Scholastic, Inc., *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 6, 2005

Filed: June 8, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, McMILLIAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Linda Leonard appeals from the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in her claims of age discrimination and retaliation for protected activity.

Upon de novo review, see Evers v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc., 241 F.3d 948, 953 (8th

Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we affirm. 

Specifically, Leonard did not present evidence establishing a prima facie case

of age discrimination or retaliation. See Erenberg v. Methodist Hosp., 357 F.3d 787,
-2-

793 (8th Cir. 2004) (elements of retaliation prima facie case); Dorsey v. Pinnacle

Automation Co., 278 F.3d 830, 836 (8th Cir. 2002) (age discrimination claims

brought under Missouri Human Rights Act subject to same analysis that controls

claims brought under federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act); Harlston v.

McDonnell Douglas Corp., 37 F.3d 379, 382 (8th Cir. 1994) (elements of age

discrimination prima facie case).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Amendment Number 1 to the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. SaraWilliams, Treasurer and Principal
Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.





Date:
October 1, 2008








/s/ Sara
Williams


Sara
Williams


Treasurer
(principal financial officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
2010-2012 DATA

Site ID

Cont 

POC Site Name m int

min for intercept

(15.05-(17.32*m) or 

>-2)

max for intercept 

(15.05-(13.2*m) or 

<2)

06-073-0003 2 El Cajon 1.10 2.35 -2 0.53

06-073-1010 2

San DiegoDowntown 

(Beardsley) 1.08 1.47 -2 0.794

06-073-1002 3 Escondido 1.10 0.80 -2 0.53

06-073-1002 4 Escondido 1.15 1.77 -2 -0.13

2011-2013 DATA

POC Site Name m int

min for intercept

(15.05-(17.32*m) or 

>-2)

max for intercept 

(15.05-(13.2*m) or 

<2)

06-073-0003 2 El Cajon 1.13 1.98 -2 0.134

06-073-1010 2

San DiegoDowntown 

(Beardsley) 1.08 1.16 -2 0.794

06-073-1002 3 Escondido 1.1 0.35 -2 0.53

06-073-1002 4 Escondido 1.14 1.91 -2 0.002

Data pulled from EPA comparison tool on 5/14/2014 (http://www.epa.gov/airquality/airdata/ad_rep_frmvfem.html)
slope criteria met?

intercept 

criteria 

met?

bias 

criteria 

met

Yes No No

Yes No No

Yes No No

No No No

slope criteria met?

intercept 

criteria 

met?

bias 

criteria 

met

No No No

Yes No No

Yes Yes Yes

No No No

ta/ad_rep_frmvfem.html)
#### STATE ex rel. James STANLEY v. Warden Hilton BUTLER.

No. 89-KP-0058.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Stanley, James;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, prohibition, supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 1960; Parish of West Baton Rouge, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84984.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.

|Subsidiary                                   |  | State of Incorporation  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
|APAC Customer Services General Partner, Inc. |  | Illinois                
|APAC Customer Services, L.L.C.               |  | Illinois                
|APAC Customer Services of Illinois, Inc.     |  | Illinois                
|APAC Customer Services of Texas, L.P.        |  | Texas                   
|APAC TeleServices, UK Limited*               |  | Incorporated in Scotland
|ITI Holdings, Inc.                           |  | Delaware                
|ITI Marketing Services, Inc.                 |  | Delaware                
|APAC M.I. Holdings, Inc.                     |  | Illinois                
|CustomerAssistance.com, Inc.                 |  | Illinois                

---

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated August 10, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on August 18, 2011, 76 FR 51401, AMRI Rensselaer, Inc., 33 Riverside Avenue, Rensselaer, New York 12144, made application by renewal to the Drug 
                    ( print page 2325)
                    Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IILisdexamfetamine (1205)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIPentobarbital (2270)
IIMeperidine (9230)
II4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture bulk controlled substances for use in product development and for distribution to its customers. In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to bulk manufacture cannabidiol as a synthetic intermediate. This controlled substance will be further synthesized to bulk manufacture a synthetic THC (7370). No other activity for this drug code is authorized for this registration. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of AMRI Rensselaer, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated AMRI Rensselaer, Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: January 6, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-658 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1196 

KA 09-00748 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JESSE D. PARSONS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NICOLE M. FANTIGROSSI OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A.

Keenan, J.), rendered December 23, 2008. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05

[1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is not

valid and challenges the severity of the sentence. Although we agree

with defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid

because the perfunctory inquiry made by County Court was “insufficient

to establish that the court ‘engage[d] the defendant in an adequate

colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a

knowing and voluntary choice’ ” (People v Brown, 296 AD2d 860, 860, lv

denied 98 NY2d 767; see People v Hamilton, 49 AD3d 1163, 1164), we

nevertheless conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. 

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2008 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2008

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4N-Oxydiphthalic 
                               anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4N-Oxydiphthalic 
                               anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4N-OXYDIPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.13 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4,4N-Oxydiphthalic 
anhydride) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         102,870
<SECURITIES>                                   0      
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48,918  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0      
<INVENTORY>                                    1,031,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,186,794
<PP&E>                                         601,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                 295,647
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,508,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          596,434
<BONDS>                                        0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0     
<PREFERRED>                                    0     
<COMMON>                                       9,999 
<OTHER-SE>                                     902,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,508,496
<SALES>                                        5,244,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,244,082
<CGS>                                          3,520,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,886,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               68,509
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5,858 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,087,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,087,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0     
<CHANGES>                                      0     
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,087,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.21) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.21) 
        

</TABLE>
Canon City 2006 PM-10 Inventory (Tons Per Year) Area and Mobile Sources PM-10 (T/Y) Agriculture 3.68 Highway Vehicle Exhaust 4.16 Railroads 0.06 Road Dust 225.83 Commercial Cooking 5.00 Construction 107.78 Fuel Combustion 0.15 Non-Road 6.16 Structure Fires 0.23 Woodburning 26.12 TOTAL 379.16

Point Sources

site_id facility _n Actual PE Factor 0004 COLO DEPT OF CORRECTIONS - CTCF,CTA 1.42 1 0050 COLORADO QUARRIES INC CANON CITY YARD 3.48 2 0068 PORTEC INC - SOUTH PLANT 0.061.142857 0074 HUMANE SOCIETY OF FREMONT CNTY 0.56 1 0141 CANON INDUSTRIAL CERAMICS, LLC 3.17 4.38 0142 THERMAL CERAMICS 4.26 4.38 TOTAL 12.95 **Grand TOTA L**  **392.11**Potential

1.41786 6.959872 0.063485 0.5626 13.89774 18.65442 41.55598 **420.72**Canon City 2020 PM-10 Inventory (Tons Per Year) Area and Mobile Sources PM-10 (T/Y) Agriculture 3.68 Highway Vehicle Exhaust 5.55 Railroads 0.05 Road Dust 288.84 Commercial Cooking 6.40 Construction 137.86 Fuel Combustion 0.19 Non-Road 4.56 Structure Fires 0.29 Woodburning 33.41 TOTAL 480.83

Point Sources

site_id facility _n PE Factor 0004 COLO DEPT OF CORRECTIONS - CTCF,CTA 1.65 1 0050 COLORADO QUARRIES INC CANON CITY YARD 5.04 2 0068 PORTEC INC - SOUTH PLANT 0.131.14286 0074 HUMANE SOCIETY OF FREMONT CNTY 1.03 1 0141 CANON INDUSTRIAL CERAMICS, LLC 4.594.38 0142 THERMAL CERAMICS 6.17 4.38 TOTAL 18.60 **Grand TOTA L**  **499.42**Potential

1.646872 10.07653 0.144451 1.027062 20.1212 27.00793 60.02404 **540.85**
# Euroopa Liidu C 210A/25.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 210A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 65. aastakäik25. mai 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 210A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

65. aastakäik25. mai 2022

---

| Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- |
| | Parandused |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Bioressursipõhise Ringmajandusega Euroopa Ühisettevõte (BRE ühisettevõte) – Teade vaba ametikoha kohta: tegevdirektor (ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14) – COM/2022/20077 ( ELT C 206 A, 23.5.2022 ) | 1 |

Sisukord

Lehekülg

Parandused

2022/C 210 A/01

Bioressursipõhise Ringmajandusega Euroopa Ühisettevõte (BRE ühisettevõte) – Teade vaba ametikoha kohta: tegevdirektor (ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14) – COM/2022/20077 ( ELT C 206 A, 23.5.2022 )

( ELT C 206 A, 23.5.2022 )

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

Parandused

| 25.5.2022 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 210/1

---

Bioressursipõhise Ringmajandusega Euroopa Ühisettevõte (BRE ühisettevõte) – Teade vaba ametikoha kohta: tegevdirektor (ajutine teenistuja – palgaaste AD 14) – COM/2022/20077

(
  Euroopa Liidu Teataja C 206 A, 23. mai 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

Leheküljel 5 pealkirja „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev“ all

| asendatakse | „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 13. juunil 2022 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“ |
| --- | --- |

asendatakse

„Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 13. juunil 2022 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“

| järgmisega: | „Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 4. juulil 2022 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“ |
| --- | --- |

järgmisega:

järgmisega:

„Avalduse esitamise tähtpäev on 4. juulil 2022 kell 12.00 päeval Brüsseli aja järgi. Hiljem ei ole kandideerimisavaldust enam võimalik esitada.“

---
#### J. Minos SIMON d/b/a Dixieland Farm v. FASIG-TIPTON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Fasig-Tipton Louisiana, Inc., and T. Mason Grasty and L.P. “Bud” Thibodaux.

No. 88-C-0944.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 13, 1988.

In re Thibodaux, L.P. “Bud”; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-0006; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 85-6761.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 788.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          25,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (750)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,144
<PP&E>                                          13,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,646)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,245
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,166
<SALES>                                         82,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,935
<CGS>                                           49,165
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,800)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,660)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,265)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,395)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF:

A.A.L., G.B.L., and A.D.L., 

CHILDREN.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00305-CV

Appeal from the

65th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2022DCM4829)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Children’s counsel filed a report regarding the trial court’s hearing on Appellant

C.G.’s motion for new trial, which includes as an attachment the trial court’s September 3, 2024 

order granting a new trial. On September 9, 2024, the clerk of this Court informed the parties of 

the Court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 42.3 unless, by September 19, 2024, any party could show grounds for 

continuing the appeal. See In Interest of A.A., No. 08-15-00177-CV, 2015 WL 4134940, at *1 

(Tex. App.—El Paso July 8, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op.).

A trial court’s order granting a motion for new trial renders a pending appeal moot. JJW, 

L.L.C. v. Aguirre, No. 08-16-00051-CV, 2016 WL 3632809, at *1 (Tex. App.—El Paso July 6, 

2016, no pet.) (mem. op.). It is well established that a court is prohibited from deciding moot 

controversies. National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Jones, 1 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Tex. 1999). To 
2

date, no party has shown grounds for continuing the appeal. As the trial court’s order granting the 

motion for new trial has rendered this appeal moot, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Any pending motions are denied as moot.

LISA J. SOTO

September 26, 2024

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.