alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Darlene EASTERDAY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Allen L. Easterday, Deceased, Appellant, v. Frank MASIELLO, Master Design Group, Inc., and Reynolds, Smith & Hills, Inc., Appellees.

No. 4-86-0562.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 21, 1987.

*118Jeff Tomberg of Tomberg & Tomberg, P.A., Boynton Beach, for appellant.

Joseph W. Downs and Pamela A. Cham-berlin of Beasley, Olle, Downs & Keihner, Miami, for appellees-Frank Masiello and Master Design Group, Inc.

Winslow D. Hawkes, III, of Peterson & Fogarty, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appel-lee-Reynolds, Smith & Hills, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Allen Easterday committed suicide by hanging from a protrusion in the air duct system while imprisoned in the Palm Beach County jail. The complaint, alleging negligence by the architects and engineers, was dismissed with prejudice. We affirm.

This appeal is governed by the doctrine, adopted in *Slavin v. Kay,*108 So.2d 462 (Fla.1958), that a contractor is relieved of liability to injured third parties caused by a patent defect after control of the completed premises has been turned over to the owner. It is undisputed, for the purpose of this appeal, that this defect was patent. *See also Conley v. Coral Ridge Properties Inc.,*396 So.2d 1220 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (Air conditioning vent determined to be a patent defect). We recognize that the determination of this issue should not be affected, as a matter of law, by the decedent’s status, age, or competency, or by whether the death was caused by suicide or accident.

The supreme court recently followed the doctrine enunciated in *Slavin*in *Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Vaughn,*491 So.2d 551 (Fla.1986). This court also adhered to *Slavin*in *El Shorafa v. Ruprecht,*345 So.2d 763 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, appellant argues that the *Slavin*rule is antiquated and inconsistent with *Auburn Machine Works Co. v. Jones,*366 So.2d 1167 (Fla.1979), and *West v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.,*336 So.2d 80 (Fla.1976). It is also noted that the *Slavin*court did not have the benefit of considering the issue in the context of the doctrine of comparative negligence, adopted by the supreme court in *Hoffman v. Jones,*280 So.2d 431 (Fla.1973). *See also Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Vaughn*(Adkins, J., dissenting); Note, *Vaughn v. Chadbourne: Strict Liability and the Road that Faded Away,*40 U.Miami L.Rev. 359 (1985).

The supreme court’s decision in *Chad-bourne*appears to dispose of the appellant’s argument. However, because the court considered the issue of whether the facts were controlled by *Slavin,*and not whether *Slavin*should be reconsidered, (although that issue was raised in the dissent), we certify the following question to the supreme court as a matter of public importance:

> Does *Slavin v. Kay*preclude recovery against the architects and/or engineers for a personal injury to a third party caused by a patent design defect in a structure?

Affirmed.

DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ„ concur.
#### Weldon J. ALLEN v. William C. HULS and Albin P. Scott.

No. 87-C-2684.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 15, 1988.

In re Huls, William C.; Scott, Albin P.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1328; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 90562.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 188.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Placer del Mar,
Ltd. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Humberto
Bravo, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 13, 2011                       By: /s/ Humberto Bravo
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Humberto Bravo
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 23, 2011 |   | /s/ George Yu                                              |   |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | George Yu,                                                 |   |
|                |   | President, CEO and a Director(Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                |   |                                                       |   |

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp.(the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Wirtz,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, these financial statements were not reviewed
      by
      our independent registered public accountants; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.








Date:
                June 19, 2007/s/
                Michael G. WirtzChief
                Financial Officer
#### LINDA A. MASI *v.*FRANCIS E. MASI

*Robert S. Kolesnik,*in support of the petition.

*Karen L. Murdoch,*in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 16260) is denied.
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



This Certificate is
being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures)
of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who
are (i) the Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., the general partner of United Development Funding III, L.P.
(the “Partnership”), and (ii) the Chief Financial Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., the general partner of the
Partnership, each hereby certify as follows:



The Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Partnership (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|Dated:  August 14, 2012 | /s/ Hollis M. Greenlaw                                                                                                                                                                                              
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Hollis M. Greenlaw                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|                        | Chief Executive Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant, and President and Chief Executive Officer of UMT Services, Inc., sole general partner of UMTH Land Development, L.P.
|                        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|Dated:  August 14, 2012 | /s/ Cara D. Obert                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|                        | Cara D. Obert                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                        | Chief Financial Officer of UMTH Land Development, L.P., sole general partner of the Registrant                                                                                                                      



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. William VANCE.

No. 88-KK-1724.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 5, 1988.

In re Vance, William; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 325-349; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-1132.

Denied.
ATTACHMENT B 

 Summary for Publication in the Federal Register Should it be 

Determined that Publication is Needed (14 CFR Part 11)
Summary for Publication in the Federal Register Should it be 

Determined that Publication is Needed (14 CFR Part 11) 

True Spatial, LLC seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §§ 61.23(a) & (c), 

61.101(e)(4) & (e)(5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), 91.417(a) & (b) and certain parts of §§ 45.23, 45.27 and 

45.29. This exemption will permit True Spatial, LLC to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System 

(UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial assessments, remote sensing and 

photogrammetry within the National Airspace System (NAS). 

The DJI S900 and 3DR X8-M UAS subject to this petition are small and lightweight, will 

be operated in strict compliance with the manufacturer’s instructions and safety requirements, 

and under controlled conditions in an airspace that pre-established and access controlled (“Sterile 

Environment”). The UA will operate only during daylight hours and within line of sight of a 

Visual Observer and the PIC. Given the small size of the subject UAS and the restricted Sterile 

Environment within which it will operate, True Spatial’s exemption falls within the zone of 

safety and demonstrates and equivalent level of safety in adherence with Congress’s 

authorization of the FAA to permit commercial UA operations by exemption pending the 

finalization of formal legislation, and presents no hazard to the National Aerospace System.

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the land owner or 

subject’s prior knowledge and consent.

True Spatial, LLC seeks the exemptions described above in order to permit the safe 

operation of the DJI S900 and 3DR X8-M commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for 

the limited purpose of conducting aerial acquisitions within the National Airspace System 

(NAS). By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional 

mandate of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests 

of the public, by allowing True Spatial to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI 

S900 and 3DR X8-M commercially within the NAS.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2314 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2314

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4'-Oxydiphthalic 
                               anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4,4'-Oxydiphthalic 
                               anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4,4'-OXYDIPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.13 of subchapter II of chapter 99 
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 
4,4'-Oxydiphthalic anhydride) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31056 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BRAD DECKER, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-50101-3

-------------------- June 7, 2001 Before JOLLY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Brad Decker, Sr., has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Decker has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and the appellate record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6801]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 3, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. William Bradley Giblet and Lita Giblet, both of Hydro, Oklahoma, 
and Gaylon Vogt, Weatherford, Oklahoma, to acquire control of Ryan 
Bancshares, Inc., parent of The First State Bank, both in Ryan, 
Oklahoma.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 16, 
2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-6801 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 14, 2007
#### Kathleen TALLEY v. Ceola STUCKEY, et al.

No. 87-CC-0357.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Stuckey, Ceola; Stuckey, James Merkel, Succ. of; Rouly, Estell; applying for supervisory writs; Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 41102; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 87-116.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in RegistrationStatements No. 333-61101, as amended; No. 333-35051;and No. 333-88216 of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. onForm S-3, and in Registration StatementsNo. 333-115280; No. 333-115279; No. 333-75709;and No. 333-35043 of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. onForm S-8, of our reports dated February 25, 2005,relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. andmanagement’s report on the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. forthe year ended December 31, 2004./s/  Deloitte &Touche LLPNew York, New YorkMarch 21, 2005
97
#### The BOARD OF LEVEE COMMISSIONERS OF the ORLEANS LEVEE DISTRICT v. The DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF the STATE OF LOUISIANA.

No. 87-CC-1450.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re White, Gayle Wichers — Third Party; applying for writ of certiorari, review, mandamus, supervisory and remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 280-022; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW87 0466.

Denied.
#### Frederick S. WEISS, Appellant, v. Janis R. WEISS, Appellee.

No. 4-86-2082.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Valentine Gabaldon, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

J. Steven Reynolds of Thompson & Reynolds, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order in all respects except its failure, in calculating the husband’s arrearage, to give appropriate credit to the husband for those periods in which the wife’s gross income exceeded his. We view it to have been the intent of the trial judge who entered the final judgment of dissolution to effect equalization, regardless of which spouse’s gross income was higher. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the purpose of effecting that intent.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.