alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2334 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2334

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather basketballs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

    Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Bunning, and Mr. Ensign) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on leather basketballs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEATHER BASKETBALLS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to leather basketballs) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Emmett MILLER v. James J. WILLIAMS, M.D., et al.

No. 89-CC-0629.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Miller, Emmett; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CW 2236; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “L”, No. 81-6708.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Michael J. HEARNE v. 14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU, STATE OF LOUISIANA.

No. 89-KH-1055.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Hearne, Michael J.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial *1214writs; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 10940-84.

Denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  RULE 13a-14(b) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Scientific, Inc. ("Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ending
October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, L. Michael Cutrer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and, Erik
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | Date: February 27, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/L. MICHAEL CUTRERL. Michael Cutrer Chief Executive
Officer                           
| | ----------------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Date: February 27, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ERIK JOHNSONErik Johnson Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting
Officer

17

---

QuickLinks
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chris Craddock, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. (the Company) hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for
      the period ended November 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                    

Date: April 16, 2010

/s/ Chris CraddockChris CraddockChief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer, Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sky Harvest
Windpower Corp. and will be retained by Sky Harvest Windpower Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2255 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyriproxyfen. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyriproxyfen. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYRIPROXYFEN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.23 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Pyriproxyfen) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  | /S/ ALAN H. AUERBACH                 
|                    |  | Alan H. Auerbach                     
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
#### In the Matter of the Application of Phœbe A. D. Boyle, as an Executor and Trustee under the Will of John Boyle, Deceased, Respondent. John H. B. Boyle, Individually and as Executor and Trustee under the Will of John Boyle, Deceased, Appellant; Hannah B. Elger et al., Respondents.

*Matter of*Boyle, 166 App. Div. 504, affirmed.

(Argued February 21, 1916;

decided March 7, 1916.)

Appeal from orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 16, 1915, which affirmed two decrees of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court,- the first of which removed John H. B. Boyle as one of the executors and trustees under the will of John Boyle, deceased, and the second of which appointed a successor to a deceased executor and trustee.

*Louis Frankel*and *Delos McCurdy*for appellant.

*Joseph G. Quinn, Jr.,*and *Louis B. Hasbrouck*for petitioner, respondent.

*Eugene D. Boyer*and *Charles Strauss*for Hannah B. Elger et al., respondents.

*674
      *Martin B. Faris*for Florence M. Bell et al., respondents.

*John Caldwell Myers*for Dorothy H.. Elger et al., respondents.

*Benjamin H. Newell for*John B. Bell, respondent.

Orders affirmed, with one bill of costs; no opinion. Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**WESTCOTT PRODUCTS CORPORATION**

**Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Westcott Products Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, Wayne Bassham and Todd Albiston hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

 

| Date:    | December 18, 2008 | * * | By:      | */s/Wayne Bassham***        |
|----------|-------------------|----------|----------|-----------------------------|
|     |              | * * |     | Wayne Bassham               |
|     |              | * * |     | President and Director      |
|     |              | * * |     | * *                    |
| Date:    | December 18, 2008 | * * | By:      | */s/Todd Albiston***        |
| * * | * *          | * * | * * | Todd Albiston               |
| * * | * *          | * * | * * | Vice President and Director |
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: March 12, 2012. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10429
New City Bank
Chicago
IL
3/9/2012


[FR Doc. 2012-6417 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 10

Expressing the sense of Congress that there should continue to be parity

between the adjustments in the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian

employees of the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 12, 1999

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. CLELAND)

submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Armed Services

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of Congress that there should continue

to be parity between the adjustments in the compensation of members of the uniformed services and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian employees of

the United States.

Whereas members of the uniformed services of the United

States and civilian employees of the United States make

significant contributions to the general welfare of the

United States;

Whereas, increases in the levels of pay of members of the uniformed services and of civilian employees of the United

States have not kept pace with increases in the overall

levels of pay of workers in the private sector so that there
2

•SCON 10 IS

is now up to a 30 percent gap between the compensation

levels of Federal civilian employees and the compensation

levels of private sector workers and a 9 to 14 percent gap

between the compensation levels of members of the uniformed services and the compensation levels of private

sector workers; and

Whereas, in almost every year of the past two decades, there

have been equal adjustments in the compensation of

members of the uniformed services and the compensation

of civilian employees of the United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that there

3 should continue to be parity between the adjustments in

4 the compensation of members of the uniformed services

5 and the adjustments in the compensation of civilian em6 ployees of the United States.

Æ
[ep_ex10z12002.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12004.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12006.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12008.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12010.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12012.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12014.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12016.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12018.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12020.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12022.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12024.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12026.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12028.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12030.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12032.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12034.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12036.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12038.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z12040.gif]
50354.

#### LESTER v. RICH’S, INC.

Evans, Judge.

Rich’s, Inc., d/b/a Richway, filed a motion for summary judgment against Ronald Lester on July 30, 1974. The motion was sustained, and counsel for Richway was instructed to prepare an order. The order was prepared and filed in the office of the clerk on July 31, 1974.

Ronald Lester, against whom this motion was granted, filed a motion to vacate and set aside said order on September 19, 1974, some 50 days later, because he had not received a copy of the order.

After a hearing, Lester’s motion was denied. The court stated in the last order that petitioner was notified of the court’s ruling; was informed of his right of appeal; had notice that the motion for summary judgment was sustained and "no burden was on the defendant to serve plaintiff with a copy of said order.” Plaintiff appeals. *Held:*

*484Submitted February 26, 1975

Decided April 7, 1975.

Ronald Lester, *pro se.*

*Carter, Ansley, Smith & McLendon, A. Jerry Sorrells,*for appellee.

1. Common courtesy required counsel for defendant to serve a copy of the order on plaintiff. Especially in this case, because plaintiff was not represented by counsel, but appeared in his own behalf. But we are not aware of any rule or law which absolutely requires service of a written judgment, pursuant to the court’s oral statement as to his intention to sustain the motion for summary judgment. Litigants and their counsel are expected to keep themselves informed as to the status of their cases in court. Here plaintiff was aware that the motion was sustained and that a formal order in writing was to be prepared sustaining *same. Donaldson v. Roberts,*109 Ga. 832 (35 SE 277); *Caylor v. Wheat,*210 Ga. 429 (80 SE2d 688).

2. The motion to set aside must be predicated upon some non-amendable defect which appears upon the face of the record or pleadings. *Alexander v. Blackmon,*129 Ga. App. 214, 216 (3) (199 SE2d 376). The burden was on the plaintiff, if he desired to appeal, to determine when the judgment was filed in the trial court. *Jordan v. Caldwell,*229 Ga. 343 (191 SE2d 530); *Thomas v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*133 Ga. App. 193, 194, 195 (210 SE2d 361).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Stolz, J., concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genio Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the six months ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony K. Welch, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 20, 2009

/s/ Anthony K. Welch

-----------------------

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ MARK P. MAYS       
|Name:                  |  | Mark P. Mays           
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2036 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2036

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Hexylresorcinol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-HEXYLRESORCINOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.29.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-Hexylresorcinol) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2397 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)–4-nitrophenyl]azo-kN1]-5-methyl-3H-pyrazol-3- 

onato(2-)-kO3][3-[[4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)–5-(oxo-kO)– 

1H-pyrazol-4-yl]azo-kN1]-4-(hydroxy-kO)–5-nitrobenzenesulfonato(3-)]-, 

disodium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Chromate(2- 

), [2,4-dihydro-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)–4-nitrophenyl]azokN1]-5-methyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)-kO3][3-[[4,5- 

dihydro-3-methyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)–5-(oxo-kO)–1Hpyrazol-4-yl]azo-kN1]-4-(hydroxy-kO)–5- 

nitrobenzenesulfonato(3-)]-, disodium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2397 IS

1 SECTION 1. CHROMATE(2-), [2,4-DIHYDRO-4-[[2-(HYDROXY2 KO)-4-NITROPHENYL]AZO-KN1]-5-METHYL-3H3 PYRAZOL-3-ONATO(2-)-KO3][3-[[4,5-DIHYDRO-3- 

4 METHYL-1-(4-METHYLPHENYL)-5-(OXO-KO)-1H5 PYRAZOL-4-YL]AZO-KN1]-4-(HYDROXY-KO)-5- 

6 NITROBENZENESULFONATO(3-)]-, DISODIUM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.86 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 Chromate(2-), [2,4-dihydro-4-[[2-(hydroxy-kO)-4- 

10 nitrophenyl]azo-kN1]-5-methyl-3H-pyrazol-3-onato(2-)- 

11 kO3][3-[[4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-1-(4-methylphenyl)-5-(oxo12 kO)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]azo-kN1]-4-(hydroxy-kO)-5- 

13 nitrobenzenesulfonato(3-)]-, disodium) is amended by 

14 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

17 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### COMMON CAUSE v. Ernest N. MORIAL, et al.

No. 87-C-1455.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Common Cause; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 86-CA-5922; *459Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “G”, No. 84-2621.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 167.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE ex rel. Charles F. CERULLO v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 89-KH-0528.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Cerullo, Charles F.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 325-116.

Denied on the showing made.