alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2214

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain programmable dual function 
                             coffee makers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain programmable dual function 
                             coffee makers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROGRAMMABLE DUAL FUNCTION COFFEE MAKERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Programmable dual   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        function coffee                                                    31/2011.......
                        makers, each with
                        a carafe capacity
                        of 1.475 liters
                        or more but not
                        over 1.77 liters
                        and a blade
                        grinder that
                        dispenses ground
                        beans directly
                        into a brew
                        basket (provided
                        for in subheading
                        8516.71.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2360 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fire retardant materials used 

to make mattresses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain fire retardant 

materials used to make mattresses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FIRE RETARDANT MATERIALS USED 

4 TO MAKE MATTRESSES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2360 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Nonwoven fabric consisting of 

two layers of needleloom felt, 

the fabric weighing less than 

250 g/m2, of a thickness not 

exceeding 3.7 mm, of a blend 

of all of the following staple 

fibers each with filament 

decitex measuring 3.5 or less: 

fire retardant rayon staple fibers, fire retardant 

modacrylic staple fibers, fire 

retardant para-aramid staple 

fibers and polyester staple fibers (provided for in subheading 5602.10.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
May 7, 2002



Mr. Greg Jehlik
1 Chieftain Lane
Natick, MA  01760

Dear Greg:

We are excited about offering you the position of President and Chief  Operating
Officer of CFC  International,  Inc. The Board of  Directors  and I believe that
your leadership will help CFC grow and create  additional  shareholder  value in
the future.

The specifics of our offer include the following:

-    Your title will be President and Chief Operating Officer. At the next Board
     of Directors Meeting, we will recommend that you be elected to be a member
     of the Board of Directors of CFC International.

-    The base salary for the position is $235,000 per year. There is an annual
     incentive compensation, which is a bonus based on the performance of the
     corporation. The annual incentive bonus has no ceiling on it. (A copy is
     attached). In addition, you will receive a one time cash bonus of $30,000
     payable upon acceptance of this offer.

-    Upon accepting this offer you will be awarded 50,000 option shares of CFC
     International stock at the then market price. (A copy of the restricted
     share agreement is attached

-    Base salary shall be reviewed annually at which time there may also be
     opportunity for additional stock option grants.



<PAGE>


Mr. Greg Jehlik
May 7, 2002
Page 2





-    In addition to the above annual compensation, you will receive a company
     car equivalent to a Cadillac, life insurance, 401K participation, and other
     executive benefits according to our standard CFC plans.

-    We will assist you in relocation by paying the normal real estate expenses
     associated with selling your home in Massachusetts and relocating to the
     Chicagoland area. Additionally, we will provide an interest free bridge
     loan to accommodate the time between buying your new home and selling your
     home in Massachusetts.

-    In the event of severance from the company, if you are terminated without
     legal cause, you will be provided with six months of base salary or until
     you are again employed, which ever comes first.

Greg, the above  specifics  indicate our excitement  about having you join us at
CFC. We look forward to your  response to this offer by May 15,  2002.  If these
specifics are agreeable to you, please indicate your acceptance by signing below
and returning to me.

If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,                   ACCEPTED:

                                ----------------------
                                Greg Jehlik

                                 Date:__________________
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-672]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0074]

Agency Information Collection (Request for Change of Program or 
Place of Training): Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the 
collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and 
burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 16, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information 
through www.Regulations.gov or to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB Human 
Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0074'' in any correspondence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 632-7479, FAX (202) 273-0487 or email 
[email protected]. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0074.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Title: Request for Change of Program or Place of Training, VA Form 
22-1995.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0074.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: Claimants receiving educational benefits complete VA Form 
22-1995 to request a change in program or training establishment. VA 
uses the data collected to determine the claimant's eligibility for 
continued educational benefits.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on November 1, 2011, at pages 67558-67559.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.

Estimated Annual Burden

    a. Electronically--8,709 hours.
    b. Paper Copy--27,095 hours.

Estimated Average Burden per Respondent

    a. Electronically--15 minutes.
    b. Paper Copy--20 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Estimated Number of Respondents

    a. Electronically--34,836.
    b. Paper Copy--81,284.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Enterprise Records Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-672 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1194

TANYON WATSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT FOR AGING & VOCATIONAL 

REHABILITATION SERVICES; CARRIE GILBERT, DARS Counselor; 

DAVIAN MORRELL, DARS Counselor; DOUG JAMES, DARS Regional 

Director; TERRY BERTSCH; JULIE TRIPLETT, VA Disability Law Center 

Advocate,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01002-LO-MSN)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tanyon Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Brown Beckner, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Steven Michael Traubert, 

DISABILITY LAW CENTER OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. 
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Tanyon Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action 

for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 6, 2017. The 

notice of appeal was filed on February 9, 2017. Because Watson failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss 

the appeal. We deny Watson’s motions to appoint counsel and to respond. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gilberto Rivera, Also Known as Gilberto Cortijo, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (William Wallace, III, J.), rendered on August 8, 1989, convicting defendant, upon a plea of guilty of two counts of robbery in the first degree and sentencing defendant to concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 6 to 18 years, unanimously affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. *(People v Farrar,*52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” *(People v Felman,*141 AD2d 889, 890, *lv denied*72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 25, 2009 

p0922 

Order 

 

September 25, 2009 

138462 

In re Estate of EDWARD JOSEPH McCORMICK, 

Deceased. 

_________________________________________/ 

ERIC A. BRAVERMAN, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of EDWARD JOSEPH 

McCORMICK, Deceased, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138462 

 COA: 277558 

Wayne Probate: 1992-513517-DE 

LINDA McCORMICK, and MARY 

McCORMICK, 

Respondents-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We 

REVERSE the order of the Wayne Probate Court approving petitioner’s 12th, 13th, 14th 

and final accountings and granting his petition for complete estate settlement, and we 

REMAND this case for further proceedings. We DIRECT the probate court to require 

the petitioner to provide an itemized accounting that establishes his and the receiver’s 

entitlement to the specific amounts they received from the estate as compensation. See 

MCR 5.310(C)(2)(c). In particular, the probate court shall require the petitioner to 

provide an itemization of the $41,485 payment to himself from the estate, and the 

$105,156 payment to the receiver from the proceeds of the sale of the real property. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would deny leave to appeal.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/01 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
EXHIBIT 31.3

Certification

I, Denise D. Roberts,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of
New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).



|       |  |                                                                                                                 
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  |  | March 27, 2015                                                                                                  
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                                                                                           
|Name:  |  | Denise D. Roberts                                                                                               
|Title: |  | President American Express Receivables
Financing Corporation IV LLC (senior officer in charge of securitization)
**Exhibit**       32.1

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Report on Form 10-K of Investors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed on February 26, 2007(the “Report”), I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Kevin J. Sheehan     |
|--------------------------|
| Kevin J. Sheehan         |
| Chairman and             |
| Chief Executive  Officer |
| February 26, 2007        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. andwill be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

In connection with the Report on Form 10-K ofInvestors Financial Services Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2006 as filed on February 26, 2007 (the “Report”), I, John N. Spinney, Jr.,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.                 The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| /s/ John N.  Spinney, Jr. |
|--------------------------------|
| Senior Vice  President and     |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |
| February 26,  2007        |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Investors Financial Services Corp. andwill be retained by Investors Financial Services Corp. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2305 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2305

 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.81 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking the date in the effective column 
period and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Shirley McNAMARA, Secretary of the Department of Revenue & Taxation, State of Louisiana v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. CITY OF BATON ROUGE and Parish of East Baton Rouge, et al. v. STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.

No. 87-C-1332.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Stauffer Chemical Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA86 0822, CA86 0823; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, Nos. 224477, 295451.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 1252.

Denied.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies that, to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Cape Fear Bank Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Cameron Coburn                   
|                        |  | Cameron Coburn                       
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 18, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2143

Lower Tribunal No. F19-21138

________________

Christopher Alan Rosario,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, 

Judge.

Christopher Alan Rosario, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before MILLER, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.