alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 Pursuant
        to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
        of
        section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
        officer of Amacore Group, Inc.., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
        does
        hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 
 The
        Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the
“Form
        10-KSB”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
        in
        the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  April 17, 2007
              */s/
                  Clark A. Marcus*Clark
                  A. MarcusChief
                  Executive OfficerDated:
                  April 17, 2007
              /s/*James
                  L. Koenig*James
                  L. KoenigActing
                  Chief Financial Officer****Principal
                  Accounting Officer
#### Ana BUSTAMANTE v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 87-C-2669.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 8, 1988.

In re Bustamante, Ana; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1308; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 277-786.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 232.

Denied.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 125

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, June 29, 2000, Fri4 day, June 30, 2000, or on Saturday, July 1, 2000, on

5 a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution

6 by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand recessed

7 or adjourned until noon on Monday, July 10, 2000, or

8 until such time on that day as may be specified by its

9 Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess

10 or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

11 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

12 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that

13 when the House adjourns on the legislative day of Thurs14 day, June 29, 2000, or Friday, June 30, 2000, on a mo15 tion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its

16 Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until

17 12:30 p.m. on Monday, July 10, 2000, for morning-hour

18 debate, or until noon on the second day after Members
2

SCON 125 ES

1 are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this

2 concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.

3 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

4 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

5 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

6 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen7 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

8 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Passed the Senate June 28, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 125

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess

of the Senate and a conditional adjournment ofthe House of Representatives.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; ZHD1 DSR-L 55 2.
    Date: April 10, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Dennis E. Leszczynski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child 
Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-2717, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3afa6b0b9a0baa783aea2aaafedadaaabeda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acc0c9dfd6cfd5c8ecc1cdc5c082c2c5c482cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6718 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 21


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiaries of Carolina First BancShares, Inc.       Jurisdiction of Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------       -----------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Cabarrus Bank of North Carolina                       North Carolina
   Concord, North Carolina

Carolina First Mortgage Corp.                         North Carolina
   Mooresville, North Carolina

Carolina First Financial Services Corp.               North Carolina
   Mooresville, North Carolina

Lincoln Bank of North Carolina, Inc.                  North Carolina
   Lincolnton, North Carolina

Lincoln Central                                       North Carolina
   Mallard Creek LLC
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20460

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVARO RIOJAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-95-CR-142-6

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steve Baxley, court-appointed attorney for Alvaro Riojas, 

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Riojas has filed a

letter stating that he does not object to the motion to withdraw. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2359 

To renew temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-Octadecanaminium, N,Ndimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4-2)-129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-sulfonato(3)- 

.kappa.N29, .kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew temporarily the suspension of duty on 1- 

Octadecanaminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4-2)- 

129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-sulfonato(3)-.kappa.N29, 

.kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2359 IS

1 SECTION 1. 1-OCTADECANAMINIUM, N,N-DIMETHYL-N-OC2 TADECYL-,(SP-4-2)-129H,31H-PHTHALO3 CYANINE 2-SULFONATO(3)-.KAPPA.N29, 

4 .KAPPAN30,.KAPPA.N31,.KAPPA.N32JCUPRATE 

5 (1). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.26 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4- 

9 2)-129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-sulfonato(3)-.kappa.N29, 

10 .kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1)) is 

11 amended by striking the date in the effective period col12 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2143 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2143

   To extend the duty suspension on Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, 
                             propyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the duty suspension on Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-trihydroxy-, 
                             propyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENZOIC ACID, 3,4,5-TRIHYDROXY-, PROPYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.34 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Benzoic acid, 3,4,5-
trihydroxy-, propyl ester) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, John H. Heyman, Chief Executive Officer of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the foregoing Annual Report of the Company:



| | (1) | fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d), and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/ John H. Heyman                     
|                      |  | John H. Heyman, Chief Executive Officer



CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Mark E. Haidet, Chief Financial Officer of
Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the foregoing Annual Report of the Company:



|(1) | fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d), and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Mark E. Haidet                     
|                      |  | Mark E. Haidet, Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2425 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain women’s 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN WOMEN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Other footwear for women, 

with outer soles and uppers 

of rubber or plastics, valued 

at more than $3 but not 

more than $6.50 per pair, 

other than house slippers 

(provided for in subheading 

6402.99.70) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2425 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Mark R. Keller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Republic Property Trust;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May12, 2006         By:       /s/ Mark R. Keller    Name:  Mark R. Keller    Title:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### James Cain *vs.*A. D. Libby.

December 2, 1884.

Municipal Court — Decision and Order Filed after Expiration of Term of Office. — -Where the judge of a municipal court, upon the expiration of his term of office, vacated and ceased to occupy the same, but thereafter reduced to writing and filed a decision and order for judgment in a case previously tried and submitted, *held,*that such decision and order were unauthorized, and a judgment entered thereon might be set aside on motion.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, refusing.to vacate a judgment.

*Rea, Kitchel é Shmo,*for appellant.

*F. Hooker,*for respondent.

Vanderburgh, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis, denying a motion to set aside a judgment against the defendant in that court. The ease was tried before Hon. Grove B. Cooley, judge of that court, who failed to file a decision therein previous to the expiration of his term of office. The facts, as set forth in defendant’s application, and as shown by the affidavit of his Honor, are “that said action was tried before him as judge, without a jury, on the 6th day of April, 1883; that he did not write his findings and decision of said case until subsequent to the expiration of his term as such judge and his vacation of said office, — that is, until after the 10th day of April, 1883; that he commenced writing out said decision prior to said 10th day of April, but did not complete and file the same until some time after that time.” The decision was filed May 21st, and orders judgment for the plaintiff, which was accordingly entered. In the absence of any further explanatory evidence, it must be taken that the judge ceased to fill or occupy his. office on the 10th day of April. The presumption from the language used is that he surrendered the office on that day, and, being • out of office, he could do no further official act; hence the written decision and order subsequently made would be unauthorized and of no effect. It is not enough that he had arrived at a conclusion before his term *492expired; it was necessary that his decision be reduced to writing and filed; until then it was subject to revision, and could not be considered as determining the case. *Kissam*v. *Hamilton,*20 How. Pr. 369; *Ayrault*v. *Sackett, 17*How. Pr. 461; *Putnam*v. *Crombie,*34 Barb. 232.

In *Carli*v. *Rhener,*27 Minn. 292, the judge filed his decision in writing the same hour but after his successor qualified, and in ignorance of the latter fact, and while he was still in possession of the office and performing its duties. He had not yet surrendered or vacated it. And he was held to be an officer *cle facto,*and his acts valid. That case is clearly distinguishable from this, and the same remark applies to the case of *State*v. *Brown,*12 Minn. 448, (538.) We think the motion to set aside the judgment was the proper remedy, and •should be granted. *Grant*v. *Vandercook, 57*Barb. 165, 175.

Order reversed, and cause remanded for new trial.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Torres, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.), rendered August 2, 1989, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree.

Even if it is accepted that the issue was properly preserved for review, we are of the view that the Trial Judge did not abuse his discretion in denying defendant’s request for an adjournment and that his decision to continue with the summations and jury charge while lying in a hospital bed did not constitute reversible error *(see, People v Singleton,*41 NY2d 402, 405; *People v Critzer,*97 AD2d 878). The record offers no support for defendant’s claim that the procedure created a circus-like atmosphere or that the jurors were distracted or *978failed to pay close attention to the substance of the jury charge. Defendant’s remaining contentions have been considered and found to be similarly lacking in merit.

Judgment affirmed. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll, Levine and Crew III, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2047 

To suspend temporarily the duty on horizontal machining center. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on horizontal machining 

center. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HORIZONTAL MACHINING CENTER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2047 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Horizontal machining center 

with true 5 axis simultaneous 

contouring capability having 

the following specifications: 

with fully automated 800 mm 

square table built into the 

machine base; with dropdown trunnion receiver with 

tilting axis center of rotation; 

capable of handling work 

loads of up to 1,600 kilograms with a precision of 

within +/¥3 arc seconds in 

the tilting and rotary axes for 

both positioning and machining; having a horizontal-spindle with a Y-axis travel of 

1,000 mm, an X-axis travel 

of 1,200 mm, and a Z-axis 

travel of 1,050 mm (provided 

for in subheading 

8457.10.00). .......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS