alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID ROBLES

,

Appellant,

v.

TEXAS 26 LLC

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 2

- 00 102

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law # 1

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2022

- CCV00 176 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution

. Finding Appellant

, David Robles , has not filed h is Appellant ’ s

Brief or filed a motion for extension of time to file a brief , we dismiss this appeal for want of

prosecution

.

On August 1 8

, 2022, the Clerk of the Court sent Appellant a letter indicating that it

appeared he no longer wished to pursue this appeal, as neither the Appellant ’ s Brief nor a motion

for extension of time had been filed. The letter indicated that the Court would submit this case for

dismissal within 10 days unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal.

As of this date, Appellant has not filed an Appellant ’ s Brief or a motion for extension of

time to file a brief , nor has he responded to correspondence sent by the Court.2 Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b) and (c), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4 2.3(b), (c).

August 30, 2022

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
## Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00230-CV

Trial Court No. 2014-4404CV

Harold & Delores Patton

Vs.

Loancare, LLC

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Motion fee

Motion fee

Clerk's record Required Texas.gov efiling fee Supreme Court chapter 51 fee Indigent Filing $10.00
$10.00
$175.00
$20.00
$50.00
$25.00
$100.00 Cornelia A Hartman

Cortney Ortega

J Keith Stanley Courtney Ortega Courtney Ortega Courtney Ortega Cortney Ortega

TOTAL: $390.00

I, Pam Estes, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler, Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND

AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 13th day of November 2015

, A.D.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIZAR, INC. AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,266
<SECURITIES>                                     8,598
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,939
<ALLOWANCES>                                       123
<INVENTORY>                                      1,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,722
<PP&E>                                           2,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,303
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,034
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,696
<SALES>                                         11,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,507
<CGS>                                            5,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    211
<INCOME-TAX>                                        32
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                179
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 13-5252 September Term, 2014 1: 13-c v -006 35-RLW Filed O n: Novembe r 18, 20 14 Nation al Asso ciation of Manu factu rers, et al., Ap pellan ts
v . Secu rities an d E x chan ge Com mission , etal.,

Ap pellee s

BEFORE: Garlan d, Ch ief Jud ge; Hend erson , Rogers, T ate l, Brown, Grif f ith, Kavana ugh, S riniv asan , Millett*, P illard, an d W ilkins*, Circuit Judges; and Se nte lle an d Ran dolp h, S enio r Circuit Judges

O R D E R Upon con siderat ion o f the pe titions for rehe aring en ban c an d th e join t resp onse the reto; an d A mn esty Inte rnatio nal’s m otion for lea v e to f ile a su pple me nta l brief in supp ort o f

pe tition for rehe aring en ban c an d th e lod ged sup plem ent al brief , it is ORDERED tha t th at t he mo tion for lea v e to f ile is granted . T he Clerk is directed to f ile the lodged do cum ent . Itis FURTHER ORDERED tha t con siderat ion o f the pe titions be deferred p end ing dispo sition o f

the pe titions for pa nel re hea ring. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Jenn ifer M. Clark Depu ty Cl erk *Circuit Judges Millett and W ilkins did n ot p articipat e in this m atte r.
|   | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/ Cynthia T. Gordon               |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------|
|            |                                |
|            | Cynthia T. Gordon                   |
|            | Chief Financial Officer             |
|            |  (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2643

ERNESTINE JOHNSON TOMS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District

Judge. (CA-95-185-4)

Submitted: July 8, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ernestine Johnson Toms, Appellant Pro Se. Clifford Carson Marshall,

Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ernestine Johnson Toms appeals the district court's order upholding the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner) finding that she was not under a disability for purposes

of the Social Security Act for the period beginning October 3,

1980, through September 30, 1986. Toms claims that the ALJ erred

because: (1) his hypothetical to the vocational expert was improper; (2) he incorrectly evaluated her allegations of pain; and

(3) his decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Because

Toms' claims are without merit and we find no reversible error, we

affirm the Commissioner's decision. See generally English v.

Shalala, 10 F.3d 1080, 1085 (4th Cir. 1993) (holding that an ALJ's

hypothetical questions to a vocational expert must be based upon

consideration of all relevant medical record evidence of the claimant's impairments); Craig v. Chater, 76 F.3d 585, 595-96 (4th Cir.

1996) (stating this court's standards for evaluation of pain and

substantial evidence). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Theresa L. Legnon, Wife of/and Bertrand LEGNON v. John McDONALD, Browning-Ferris Industries Inc., Prudential Insurance Company, ABC Insurance Company and New Orleans Cold Storage & Warehouse Company, Ltd.

No. 87-C-1445.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re McDonald John; Browning-Ferris Indus. Inc.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-650; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 293-905.

Prior report: La.App., 505 So.2d 1159.

Denied.
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. TSEVDOS v. REIMER, Com’r of Immigration.

No. 179.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 8, 1940.

*861John S. Wise, Jr., of New York City, for appellant.

John T. Cahill, U. S. Atty., of New York City (John B. Creegan, Ass’t. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and PATTERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case does not differ from United States ex rel. Foradis v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 101 F.2d 1022, which we affirmed on the authority of Philippides v. Day, 283 U.S. 48, 51 S.Ct. 358, 75 L.Ed. 833. At his examination on March 17, 1938, the relator testified under oath that when he signed on as a member of the crew of the steamship which brought him to this country, he intended to desert the ship and go to work in Cleveland, where his brothers had a shop. Although he retracted this testimony at the hearing of March 28th and then swore that he did not know the ship was bound for the United States when he signed on at Antwerp and that he formed the intention to desert after arrival here, the immigration inspector was not obliged to accept his later story. His earlier admission furnishes ample support for a finding that he did not enter the United States temporarily as a bona fide seaman in pursuit of his calling. But even if he had so entered, he would nevertheless be deportable under section 14 of the Immigration Act of 1924, 8 U.S.C.A. § 214. Philippides v. Day, supra. Therefore he was not entitled to a hearing before a board of special inquiry for examination as to his qualifications for admission to the United States, as provided in section 34 of the Immigration Act of 1917, 8 U.S.C.A. § 166. United States ex rel. Anastasios Cateches v. Day, 2 Cir., 45 F.2d 142; United States ex rel. Costas Cateches v. Day, 283 U.S. 51, 51 S.Ct. 359, 75 L.Ed. 835.

Judgment affirmed.
50263.

#### LINDSEY et al. v. THE STATE.

Argued February 4, 1975

Decided February 19, 1975.

*Kennedy, Bussey, Sampson & Spaulding, Benjamin W. Spaulding,*for appellants.

*John T. Strauss, District Attorney,*for appellee.

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

The defendants were tried and convicted of the offense of shoplifting. Their appeal to this court is based solely on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict against them. *Held:*

The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction although there was some discrepancy in the testimony of some of the state’s witnesses.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.*
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of CBR Brewing Company, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  May 8, 2003                      By:  /s/ DA-QING ZHENG
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Da-qing Zheng
                                             Chairman of the Board and
                                             Chief Executive Officer




Date:  May 8, 2003                      By:  /s/ GARY C.K. LUI
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Gary C.K. Lui
                                             Vice President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer


                                       85
<PAGE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 16

- 00421

- CR

Santiago “ Jimmy ” LOMAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8581

- A

Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 8, 2017

REVERSED AND REMANDED

This is an appeal from a trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for post

- conviction

DNA testing. After appellant’s brief was filed, but before the State filed its brief, the parties filed

a “Motion to Enter Agreed Order to Conduct DNA Testing on Biological Materials.” Based on

the parties’ agreed motion, we reverse the trial court’s ord er denying appellant’s motion for DNA

testing and remand the matter to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the parties ’

agreed motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2 (d); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.3(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
LEW DUNN

ATTORNEY AT LAW

P.O. BOX 2226

LONGVIEW, TEXAS 75606-2226

 Email: dunn@texramp.net

TELEPHONE 903-757-6711

FAX 903-757-6712

March 2, 2015

Ms. Debra Autry

Clerk of Court

Sixth Court of Appeals

Bi-State Justice Building

100 North State Line Avenue #20

Texarkana, TX 75501

RE: Appellate Cause #06-14-00024-CR

Esaw Lampkin v. State of Texas

Trial Cause No. 42,897-B

Pending in the Sixth Court of Appeals

On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

Dear Ms. Autrey:

 As a supplement to authorities cited in the “Brief for Appellant” in the above 

numbered and styled cause, I respectfully bring to the Court’s attention an opinion handed 

down last week in another Court of Appeals on the issue of ineffective assistance of 

counsel:

Lopes v. State, No. 01-13-01079-CR (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] February 26, 2015).

Respectfully submitted,

/S/ Lew Dunn

Lew Dunn, Attorney at Law

Texas State Bar #06244600

CC: Mr. L. Charles Van Cleef VIA E-Mail: charles@vancleef.pro

 Mr. Esaw Lampkin

ACCEPTED

06-14-00024-CR

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

3/2/2015 12:16:02 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 3/2/2015 12:16:02 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
\
Order entered August 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01703-CR

No. 05-12-01704-CR

JOHN RUIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-31859-H, F10-31315-H

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On June 26, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On August 8, 2013, we received the record. Therefore, in 

the interest of expediting the appeals, we VACATE the June 26, 2013 order requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David O'Neill, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global Electronic Recovery Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Electronic Recovery Corp. for the period ended October 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Electronic Recovery Corp.

Dated: December 21, 2007

/s/ David O'NeillDavid O'Neill
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|Exhibit 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Fu Xu, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Fu XuFu XuChief Accounting OfficerDated: April 18, 2008
|-----------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      23, 2009
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-61101 as amended; No. 333-36659;
No. 333-35051; and No. 333-88216 on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement No. 333-146148;
No. 333-115280; No. 333-115279; No. 333-75709; No. 333-35043 on Form S-8, of our reports dated
February 28, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),Share-Based
Payment, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plansand Financial Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109), and the effectiveness of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.

New
York, New York
February 28, 2008

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2382 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2382

 To suspend temporarily the duty on parts of frames and mountings for 
                   spectacles, goggles, or the like.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on parts of frames and mountings for 
                   spectacles, goggles, or the like.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTS OF FRAMES AND MOUNTINGS FOR SPECTACLES, GOGGLES, OR 
              THE LIKE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Parts of frames     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        and mountings for                                                  31/2011.......
                        spectacles,
                        goggles, or the
                        like (provided
                        for in subheading
                        9003.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```