alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman D. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 17, 2010








/s/ Norman D. SmithNorman D. Smith,

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATIONS**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNX Gas Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, President and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) of the Registrant, certify that to my knowledge, based upon a reviewof the Report:     (i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.          Date: August 2, 2006           /s/ Nicholas J. DeIuliis         **Nicholas J. DeIuliis**    **President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**  
37
## Court of A ppeals

of the S t ate of Georgia

ATL ANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1338. JUNIOR JOSEP H v. THE STATE.

Th i s cas e was d ock et ed b y t hi s co u rt o n A p ri l 1 6

, 2 0 2 4

. Th e A pp el l an t ’ s b ri ef

an d en u m erat i o n o f erro rs w er e d u e M ay 6

, 20 2 4

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s o rd er, t h e

Ap p el l an t s t i l l h as n o t fi l ed a b ri ef an d en um erat i o n o f erro rs an d h as n o t req u es t ed

an ex ten si o n o f t i m e i n w h i ch t o d o s o

. Th e fi l i n g i s 4 2 day s l at e. Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s

ap p eal i s h ereb y d eem ed ab an d o n ed an d D ISM ISSED p u rs u an t t o Co u rt of Ap p eal s

Ru l es 1 3 an d 2 3 (a).

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t h a t t h e a b o v e i

s a t r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. June 17, 2024

06/17/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Xu KechengName:
Xu KechengTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2368 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40% Polymer acid salt/polymer amide 

60% Butyl acetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 40% Polymer acid salt/ 

polymer amide 60% Butyl acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 40% POLYMER ACID SALT/POLYMER AMIDE 60% 

4 BUTYL ACETATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 40% Polymer acid salt/polymer amide 60% Butyl acetate 

(provided for in subheading 

3208.90.00) ........................... 0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2368 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Raymond DECKERT, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent.

No. 85SC183.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Oct. 15, 1985.

NEIGHBORS and KIRSHBAUM, JJ.,

would grant as to the following issue:

Whether the Arapahoe County trial court erroneously failed to dismiss the charges against petitioner where he presented evidence he was not advised of his rights under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6855]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10079--Millennium State Bank of Texas, Dallas, TX

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Millennium State Bank of Texas, 
Dallas, Texas (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership 
for said institution. The FDIC was appointed Receiver of Millennium 
State Bank of Texas, Dallas, Texas, on July 2, 2009. The liquidation of 
the receivership assets has been completed. To the extent permitted by 
available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making 
a final dividend payment to proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department, 1601 Bryan 
Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated this 16th day of March, 2012.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6855 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CNX Gas Corporation;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange of Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers with in those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b. [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter (the registrant’s fourthquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.          Date: August 2, 2006           /s/ Nicholas J. DeIuliis         **Nicholas J. DeIuliis**    **President, Chief Executive Officer and Director**  
35
#### TELSAVE LEASING GROUP, a Florida joint venture, et al., Appellants, v. TELTEC SAVING COMMUNICATIONS CO., a Florida corporation, Bernard B. Weksler and Alfred Aronovitz, Appellees.

No. 86-2644.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

*59Pardo *&*Pardo and Joseph Pardo, Miami, for appellants.

Bernard B. Weksler, Coral Gables, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

An attorney is entitled to a charging lien against a res only if payment of his fees is either contingent upon recovery of that res or payment is to be made from that res. *Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom,*428 So.2d 1383 (Fla.1983). In this case, Weksler’s and Aronovitz’s fees were made contingent, by express contractual terms, solely upon the recovery of unpaid rent money in an action for the breach of a lease. Thus, the charging lien was properly imposed against the trial court's judgment upholding the lease agreement. The charging lien upon the unpaid rent was destroyed, however, when this court reversed the trial court’s judgment on appeal, *Teltec Saving Communications Co. v. Telsave Leasing Group,*488 So.2d 576 (Fla. 3d DCA) *review denied,*500 So.2d 546 (Fla. 1986), eliminating the res upon which recovery was contingent. Based upon the parties’ express intentions to limit the contingency of payment to recovery of unpaid rent money, we find that the trial court erred in extending the charging lien to Telsave Leasing Group’s recoupment of its investment. Accordingly, the order under review is

Reversed.
| (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d),      and, |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  August      14, 2008 | /s/      Darin M. Myman                    |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Darin      M. Myman                        |
|                                   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                       |
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2204 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro-5-oxo-naphthalnene1-sulfonic acid ester with 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzophenone. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro5-oxo-naphthalnene-1-sulfonic acid ester with 2,3,4- 

trihydroxybenzophenone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 6-DIAZO-5,6-DIHYDRO-5-OXO-NAPHTHALNENE-1- 

4 SULFONIC ACID ESTER WITH 2,3,4- 

5 TRIHYDROXYBENZOPHENONE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2204 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro-5-oxonaphthalnene-1-sulfonic acid 

ester with 2,3,4- 

trihydroxybenzophenone 

(CAS No. 68510–93–0) (provided for in subheading 

2927.00.25) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 99
                           Forward-Looking Statements


The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this
report and presented elsewhere by management from time to time.

DEPENDENCE ON OTHERS: The Company's present growth strategy for development and
management of additional lodging facilities entails entering into various
arrangements with present and future property owners. There can be no assurance
that any of the Company's current agreements with property owners will be
continued, or that the Company will be able to enter into future collaborations.

CONTRACT TERMS FOR NEW UNITS: The terms of the operating contacts, distribution
agreements, franchise agreements and leases which relate to the Company's
lodging facilities are influenced by contract terms offered by the Company's
competitors at the time such agreements are entered into. Accordingly, there can
be no assurance that contracts entered into or renewed in the future will be on
terms that are as favorable to the Company as those under existing agreements.

COMPETITION: The profitability of hotels operated by the Company is subject to
general economic conditions, competition, the desirability of particular
locations, the relationship between supply of and demand for hotel rooms, and
other factors. The Company generally operates hotels in markets that contain
numerous competitors, and the continued success of the Company's hotels in their
respective markets will be dependent, in large part, upon those facilities'
ability to compete in such areas as access, location, quality of accommodations,
amenities, and cost.

SUPPLY AND DEMAND: During the 1990s, construction of lodging facilities in
the United States resulted in an excess supply of available rooms, and the
oversupply had an adverse effect on occupancy levels and room rates in the
industry. The current outlook for the industry indicates that the lodging
industry may be adversely affected in the future by (i) international,
national and regional economic conditions, (ii) changes in travel patterns,
(iii) taxes and government regulations which influence or determine wages,
prices, interest rates, construction procedures and costs, and (iv) the
availability of capital.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marley Coffee Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shane Whittle, the
President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:
June 14, 2009





Shane
Whittle





/s/Shane
Whittle


(Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal
Accounting Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles H. Yancey, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), both rendered February 24, 1988, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree under Indictment No. 1474/81, and bail jumping in the second degree under S.C.I. No. W 121/88, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; *cf., People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Brown, Sullivan, Harwood and Miller, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2340 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Acetylnicotinic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2- 

Acetylnicotinic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-ACETYLNICOTINIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.02 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2-Acetylnicotinic acid) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2340 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21

# Subsidiaries of Bremer
Financial Corporation

# Name of Subsidiaries
and State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation as ofMarch 18 2004:

State of Minnesota:

| | Bremer
Business Finance Corporation                Bremer Financial Services, Inc.
               Bremer Insurance Agencies, Inc.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State of Connecticut:

| | Bremer
Statutory Trust I
| | ------------------------

State of Delaware:

| | Bremer
Capital Trust I
| | ----------------------

State of Arizona:

| | Bremer
Life Insurance Company
| | -----------------------------

United States (National Bank Act):

| | Bremer
Bank, National Association (Alexandria, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Brainerd, MN) 
Bremer Bank, National Association (Grand Forks, ND)
Bremer Bank, National Association (International Falls, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Marshall, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Menomonie, WI) 
Bremer Bank, National Association (Minot, ND)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Moorhead, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (St. Cloud, MN) 
Bremer Bank, National Association (South Saint Paul, MN)
Bremer Bank, National Association (Willmar, MN) 
Bremer Trust, National Association
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Norman GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-3049.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1987.

Sheldon M. Schapiro of the Law Offices of Presley & Schapiro, P.A., Fort Lauder-dale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Eddie J. Bell, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to expunge or seal his criminal history records pursuant to section 943.058, Florida Statutes, and Rule 3.692, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Not only do appellant’s petition and affidavit meet the statutory criteria, but the forms appellant has used have been approved by the supreme court. Since appellant’s petition was alternatively titled “Petition to Expunge or Seal,” the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s petition where appellant met the criteria for the sealing of criminal history records as provided by section 943.058(2), Florida Statutes (1985), and amended Rules 3.692 *39and 3.989, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.