alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1968 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1968

  To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 
                               mefenoxam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the suspension of duty on mixtures of difenoconazole and 
                               mefenoxam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF DIFENOCONAZOLE AND MEFENOXAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.53 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixtures of difenoconazole 
and mefenoxam) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and by inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2318 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3 Chloro 4 Methyl Aniline. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 3 Chloro 

4 Methyl Aniline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3 CHLORO 4 METHYL ANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.16 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3 Chloro 4 Methyl Aniline) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2318 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Harry James LOGAN, Appellant, v. James A. JOHNSTON, Warden U. S. Penitentiary, Alcatraz Island, California, Appellee.

No. 9307.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1940.

Raymond J. O’Connor, of San Francisco,. Cal., for appellant.

Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., and A. J. Zirpoli, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San, Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and. STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal in this-*1017cause, D.C., 28 F.Supp. 98, be dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court in this cause issue forthwith.
50399.

#### THE STATE v. SMITH.

Argued March 11, 1975

Decided April 23, 1975.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carter Goode, Donald G. Frost, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellant.

*J. Ralph McClelland, Jr.,*for appellee.

Quillian, Judge.

This is an appeal by the state from an order of the trial court sustaining defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized after arrest of the defendant.

The facts of this case raise only the question of whether the information within the knowledge of the arresting officer was sufficient to establish probable cause for the arrest of the defendant. The state relied upon one witness, whose testimony was vague, equivocal, and self-contradictory. In a motion to suppress, the judge sits as the trier of fact. *Kelly v. State,*129 Ga. App. 131 (198 SE2d 910). Credibility of the witness and the weight to be accorded his testimony rests solely with the trier of fact and he is not obligated to believe a witness even though he is not contradicted by other witnesses. *Chaffin v. Community Loan &c. Co.,*67 Ga. App. 410 (20 SE2d435). He may accept a portion of the testimony of a witness and reject another portion. *Garrison v. Garmon,*94 Ga. App. 868, 872 (96 SE2d 550). In essence, credibility and weight, and resolution of conflicts or inconsistencies within the testimony of a witness are matters to be determined by the judge in a motion to suppress. In the absence of evidence of record demanding a finding contrary to the judge’s determination, this court will not reverse the ruling sustaining a motion to suppress.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.*
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 02/07 
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 03/07 

..... •••••·•• ·••.••········~~~~i~~~r~~f.6l~:&a;A~i~o~I~~-·•·•·• 

.. · ...••... ~o~~EJ\s;Jri,s: ·· · · · i&4s6 !,* s,lJIJiyan• . • · 

.,,'· 

l 

. ·········i~l)(}~~~~··bl~···~~j.••~YWiR~i··~·i'4~••·4~i~ .•• !lifq~··~·.··~iO~.ijo4~-~~··~,~~ii, •. ·§iivil~~~.t!w:t ~·.~M.r~io iJ:;S¢Si:a¢~~~·~~#~ l!l..~~~t9f~~~;~o:.,:p~ ·• 

:~iliyiJ~,~~t~)~s~~~~~~.~~~llli~.~~~~#·d~m~~fo~1i:"~rii,:;•·;••·•·• .·· 

~k§\vg~; Adffit~. 

: : ' ~,, 
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 04/07 

....... ·······• .: ~~s~~~=··~~~~;.•·····.•···•····• " ' 

· ....... sl•.····· ~~t:4 #isditi$: %s ·{ldi~. ~~e~ fot ~ :~ob,lJ?~r i!lS~tipn' ~~· ~$5o .1~.~·.······ 

···•••·• .•••••.•• ····,·!\N~~~~;. ~~:.~~lek\;~ii i~li~··~t the ~¢f~ft·~·~~~. used ~l~ly··· .. ·. · .. 'ftir 'rentah:i tatitirts: .ifui.Cthe •mallifot sti(ih a 'e&Jiclusion is sim I · ~4SO· 

.•• ·····~i~!~~~~~~~~j.t ~~~~·tPt ~~~rf,,.· .. E~c~pt '!Is' ~~p#~•;~o~; ~e ••..•. .. ''" 

'"' .::.;·,. ,.,,,., :, :.:.::·::·:":::::: :· ·.::· .. :. ':: ' ,•: ',: .: ·:::. ,: ·, . . " .. ' •: ..... ·· ·:,· .. : . 

. ~i~~~~~~~:~~~~~ , . . . • •. ::1.,'?$:\IA ~l;Whi h(\ljt~/'' •• ··.·.· · 

· J ' .•. · .• ~.i.~.·~·~·~·:·:~~~~.=.~~,t...~i~~r~r~· : .... :_: '<;:<;_); .. :,~,:.i, :·:,::,;,·, : :·. ·.? '!: ~;-~:,; :,:!.'::_[:,:::~: ·,:;.,· :·. ·.·· ,: ')::! ;!::;·:.: . •• · . .... ··:.:::--:.':,::;:: ;,,:·.>· .. :::;; .,:,:,.:,,,,·;,;;,::·'' 

·,:: .· .... :.:".:. ·::> .. ".:' 
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 05/07 

'.: ... ·:;' ":' 

... ·.·" 

·., ,•· :·:' 

' 

:·:·::.·•' .. ,, 

.•. (q) 
08/08/2015 02:50PH 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 05/07 
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 

,'::! !i;li'ii,:~~~~~i~,i',i!ii • ·•·• ··· ~~~~~:~~*~~fi~~~[t~d~~f~~ij~~!.?~~~e.~~~·$!e§,0au.··• .. • ..• ··~~~~~~~~~tinrt.:•••• ........ 

., .. ~a::J~~34 ' ........... . 

. ····.·~Df r~LlN~:~.~ ~~~E~··~~$s.:.••· 

•:~~~~~-~ ' '~'1fhiJ>~?~~i~ 2,Q~~t < . . .... · ' •• •.• . . . 

·· .. A4A;·H~~'£)99~t(llerl1;;8-G.C:4$0 · 

.... , llolii ~J:~~~~i,:!,''::i 

.;· 

07/07 
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 

To: 

Clear Day Aviation, Inc. 

dba Burlington Aviation 

3510 Alamance Road 

Burling~on, NC 27215 

Sharice Jefferson FAA 

From: Clear Day Aviation Inc. 

Re: Hearing Docket Clerk 

CC: 

BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 01/07 

Fax: 

Date: 

Pages: 

BUS (336) 227-1:178 

FAX (336) 221-1ns 

202-267-1293 

8/8/2015 

7 (including cover) 

(X) Urgent (X) For Review ( ) P!eaaeComment ) P!eaaeReply ( ) Please Recycle 

• • • • 

Faxed at request of 

H. Bruce Brandon 

3439 South Aviation Drive 

Burlington, NC 27215 

Attorney for: 

Burlington Aviation 

~ 

• • • • • • 

. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2356 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2356

  To suspend temporarily the duty on a mixture of 1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-
    octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-ethan-1-one (and 
                               isomers).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on a mixture of 1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-
    octahydro-2,3,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-ethan-1-one (and 
                               isomers).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-OCTAHYDRO-2,3,8,8-TETRAMETHYL-2-
              NAPHTHALENYL)-ETHAN-1-ONE (AND ISOMERS).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixture of 1-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-                                                  31/2011.......
                        octahydro-2,3,8,8-
                        tetramethyl-2-
                        naphthalenyl)-
                        ethan-1-one (and
                        isomers) (CAS
                        Nos. 54464-57-2;
                        68155-66-8; 68155-
                        67-9) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        2914.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 1998
Form 10-K of Armor Holdings, Inc., and is qualifed in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000845752
<NAME> ARMOR HOLDINGS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,789,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,363,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,380,000
<INVENTORY>                                  9,103,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,165,000
<PP&E>                                      16,345,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,172,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              94,353,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,799,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       165,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,937,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                94,353,000
<SALES>                                     97,207,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            97,207,000
<CGS>                                       66,451,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               83,562,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               418,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (625,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             13,673,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,077,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,596,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,596,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Patrick WASHINGTON v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-1553.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Washington, Patrick; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “F”, No. 297-514; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-5859.

Denied.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 23.1



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
              ---------------------------------------------------



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-38765), the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(No. 333-38759), the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-70522), the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71063), and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-44742) of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report
dated March 28, 2002 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which
appear in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Jacksonville, Florida
March 28, 2002
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China Energy (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alex Gong, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Alex GongAlex
      GongChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      July 15, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Energy Corporation and will be retained by China Energy Corporation
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Alex Chalmers HOPE, Jr. v. LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION.

No. 86-OB-2419.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Hope, Alex Chalmers Jr.; applying for admission.

Denied.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 4, 2021

Order 

Clerk

January 4, 2021

160457

In re T.J. DIEHL, Minor.

_________________________________________

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Petitioner-Appellant,

SC: 160457

v COA: 345672 

Oakland CC Family Div: 

 2017-855352-DL

T.J. DIEHL,

Respondent-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the case is ADJOURNED from the January 2021 oral 

argument session of the Court.
# L_2006148EN.01003601.xml

| 2.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 148/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 148/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 821/2006

of 1 June 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar to certain third countries for the 27th partial invitation to tender issued within the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1) and in particular the second indent of Article 27(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 of 15 July 2005 on a standing invitation to tender to determine levies and/or refunds on exports of white sugar (2), for the 2005/2006 marketing year, requires partial invitations to tender to be issued for the export of this sugar to certain third countries.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 a maximum export refund shall be fixed, as the case may be, account being taken in particular of the state and foreseeable development of the Community and world markets in sugar, for the partial invitation to tender in question.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 27th partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1138/2005 the maximum amount of the export refund shall be 31,523 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 2 June 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 16.7.2005, p. 3.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,271
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,774
<INVENTORY>                                     23,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,548
<PP&E>                                          28,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,171
<BONDS>                                         25,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,225
<COMMON>                                        90,680
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,646
<CGS>                                           57,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                66,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    430
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,397
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,192)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Jerome Milton POWELL, Jr. v. Charles C. FOTI, Jr., Sheriff, Orleans Parish Prison.

No. 87-KH-1003.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Powell, Jerome Milton Jr.; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 272-944.

Denied.
# L_2006192EN.01001501.xml

| 13.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 192/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 192/15

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1062/2006

of 12 July 2006

fixing a single allocation coefficient to be applied to the tariff quota for wheat under Regulation (EC) No 958/2003

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 of 3 June 2003 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Decision 2003/286/EC as regards the concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas on certain cereal products originating in the Republic of Bulgaria and amending Regulation (EC) No 2809/2000 (2), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 has opened an annual tariff quota of 384 000 tonnes of wheat (serial number 09.4676) for 2006/07. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 has opened an annual tariff quota of 384 000 tonnes of wheat (serial number 09.4676) for 2006/07.

| (2) | The quantities applied for on Monday 10 July 2006 in accordance with Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a single allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The quantities applied for on Monday 10 July 2006 in accordance with Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 exceed the quantities available. The extent to which licences may be issued should therefore be determined and a single allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Each application for an import licence in respect of the ‘Republic of Bulgaria’ quota for wheat lodged and sent to the Commission on Monday 10 July 2006 in accordance with Article 2(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2003 shall be accepted at a rate of 12,610837 % of the quantities applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 136, 4.6.2003, p. 3. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1023/2006 (OJ L 184, 6.7.2006, p. 5).

2

---