alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigned’s
knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the
period certified.





Date:
November 16, 2009




By:
              /s/
      Richard S. FooteRichard
      S. FootePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)




By:
              /s/
      R. Bradley ForthR.
      Bradley ForthExecutive Vice President, Chief
      Financial Officerand Secretary
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)




The
foregoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original of
this statement has been provided to Highbury Financial Inc. and will be retained
by Highbury Financial Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Murphy LeBOUEF v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-2064.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 14, 1988.

In re LeBouef, Murphy; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 24487, 24528; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW87-1025.

Denied.
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

AXLE HOLDINGS, INC.

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     WHEREAS, Axle Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”) has established and maintains the Axle
Holdings, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of May 25, 2005;



     WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan permits the Committee (unless otherwise stated in this
Amendment, defined terms used herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan) to amend
the Plan; and



     WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to increase the total number of shares of
Common Stock reserved and available for distribution pursuant to Awards under the Plan by 60,000
(from 281,352 to 341,352).



     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the power and authority reserved to the
Committee by Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Plan be and hereby is amended, effective October 25,
2006, in the following manner:



     Section 5.1 of the Plan is amended by replacing it in its entirety with the following:




“5.1 Number. Subject to the provisions of Section 5.3, the number
of shares of Common Stock subject to Options under the Plan may not exceed
341,352 shares. The shares of Common Stock to be delivered under the Plan
may consist, in whole or in part, of shares held in treasury or authorized
but unissued shares not reserved for any other purpose. All shares
available for issuance under the Plan may be made subject to the grant of
Incentive Stock Options.”



     Except as provided herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this Amendment to be executed as of the
25th day of October, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
AXLE HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ David Wahrhaftig
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	David Wahrhaftig	 	 
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Chairman
Document

Exhibit 10.10

  Two Folsom Street
         San Francisco, CA 94105



November 23, 2020




Sonia Syngal    




Dear Sonia:


This letter is to confirm the extension of the existing severance provisions, which are outlined in the “Termination/Severance” section of your offer letter dated March 4, 2020 (“Offer Letter”).  The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors (“the Committee”) has approved the extension of such severance provisions to June 30, 2024 with no other changes to such provisions.


After June 30, 2024, you will be eligible for severance, if any, as approved by the Committee under the same terms as similarly situated executive officers.


Other than as set forth above, the terms of your Offer Letter remain in effect.


Yours sincerely,




/s/ Bob L. Martin                                      
Bob L. Martin
Executive Chairman, Gap Inc.










/s/ Sonia Syngal                                           
Sonia Syngal           






Date: November 23, 2020
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

MARQUEE RAINE ACQUISITION CORP. 

65 East 55th Street, 24th Floor 

New York, NY 10010 
 [•], 2020

 Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP 
 65 East 55th Street,
24th Floor 
 New York, NY 10022 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the
registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”) of the securities of Marquee Raine Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and
continuing until the earlier of (i) the completion by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred
to as the “Termination Date”), Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP or an affiliate thereof shall take steps, directly or indirectly, to make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and administrative
services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 65 East 55th Street, 24th Floor, New York, NY 10022 (or any successor location). Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP hereby agrees that the aforementioned services shall be
provided free of charge, but will be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such services. Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to
any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”) that may be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in the future as
a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever. 

[Signature Page Follows] 












 
			
	Very truly yours,
	
	Marquee Raine Acquisition Corp.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Name:
		 	Title:


  

					
	Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor LP
	
	 Acting by its general partner,

Marquee Raine Acquisition Sponsor GP Ltd.

			
		 	By:	 	 
		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
			
		 	By:	 	 
		 		 	Name:
		 		 	Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         164,550               2,342,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  665,679               5,005,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                    41,500                 120,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,802,716               3,304,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,708,416              10,949,572
<PP&E>                                       1,700,935               2,956,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                 670,266               1,438,681
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,234,939              14,615,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,372,469              10,137,847
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            73                      76
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,154,387)             (4,500,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,234,939              14,615,876
<SALES>                                     15,881,995              40,943,321
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,881,995              40,943,321
<CGS>                                       12,162,716              27,734,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,162,716              27,734,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,819,849              15,357,348
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             166,478                 711,848
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,860,756)             (3,488,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (709,165)             (1,333,142)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,151,591)             (2,155,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,151,591)             (2,155,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.10)                   (.20) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        


</TABLE>
# L_2008333DE.01001701.xml

| 11.12.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 333/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 333/17

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1896/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Dezember 2006 zur Einführung eines Europäischen Mahnverfahrens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 399 vom 30. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 399 vom 30. Dezember 2006

Seite 11 bis 32 — die Anhänge I bis VII erhalten folgende Fassung:

ANHANG I

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

ANHANG II

Image

Image

ANHANG III

Image

Image

ANHANG IV

Image

Image

ANHANG V

Image

Image

Image

ANHANG VI

Image

Image

ANHANG VII

Image

Image

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2283 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2283

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Cyclic TMP Formal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Cyclic TMP Formal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLIC TMP FORMAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.96 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Cyclic TMP Formal) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective column period and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue East 

P.O. Box 19276 

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276 

Dear Ms. Armitage: 

Thank you for your September 18, 2015 recommendations regarding the attainment status areas in 

Illinois under the 2010 sulfur dioxide (S02) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). As you know, 

EPA is subject to a March 2, 2015 court order directing us to promulgate S02 designations for these 

areas under section 107 of the Clean Air Act by July 2, 2016. Specifically, we are required to promulgate 

designations for these areas because they contain sources meeting the SOz emissions criteria identified 

in the consent decree. The information you provided will greatly help us meet this duty, and ensure 

protection of public health in Illinois. 

In addition to the information you have provided, we have recently received modeling and related 

information from the Sierra Club that is relevant to a subset of the areas to be addressed by July 2, 2016. 

In your state, we have received information pertinent to the areas near the following power plants: 

Newton, Joppa, and Marion. We understand that you have received this information directly from the 

Sierra Club. Please let us know if you have any questions about the information we have received or if 

you need any additional information. 

I am writing to solicit your review of the information that Sierra Club has provided, so that the EPA can 

base its designations decisions on the best available information. The Clean Air Act provides for 

designations to be developed through a partnership of state agencies and EPA; however, we also believe 

it is important to consider significant and relevant information that members ofthe public provide to us. 

Consistent w ith the structure of the Clean Air Act, we believe that the best first step in addressing this 

information would be for your agency to provide its review of this information. Since the Sierra Club's 

recommendations differ from your recommendations, we would welcome your commentary generally 

on the information as well your detailed review of the elements of Sierra Club's analysis. To the extent 

practicable, we would appreciate quantitative comparisons of data used in Sierra Club's analysis 

compared to the data used in your analysis, to help us evaluate the elements of the two analyses. 

We would appreciate your review of Sierra Club's information by November 17, 2015. Your timely 

review would provide us valuable assistance in our review of your designation recommendations and 

development of our intended designations, w hich we are aiming to complete by the end of January 

2016. We will then publish notice of our intended designations for public comment, and, as required by 

the Clean Air Act, promulgate final designations no sooner than 120 days after giving you notice of 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (100% Post-Consumer) 
Air Programs Branch, Chief
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                           CURBSTONE ACQUISITION CORP.


         Curbstone Acquisition Corp., incorporated on November 29, 1988.

         Thomas R. Brooksbank and George G. Chachas hereby certify that:

First:            They are the president and secretary, respectively, of 
Curbstone Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation").

Second:  That at a meeting of the Board of Directors  of  Curbstone  Acquisition
Corp., a Delaware  corporation,  held on December 1, 1997, a resolution was duly
adopted setting for a proposed  amendment of the  Certificate of  Incorporation.
The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED,  That the  Article 1., of the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of this
Corporation is amended to read as follows:

                                    ARTICLE 1

         The  name  of  this  Corporation   (hereinafter   called  the  or  this
"Corporation") is ELECTROOPTICAL SYSTEMS CORP.

Third:  That thereafter,  pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors,  the
shareholders  holding  the  necessary  number of shares as  required by statute,
voted  for,   approved  and  adopted  the  amendment  to  the   Certificate   of
Incorporation  in accordance with Section 228 of the General  Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.

Fourth:  That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance  with the provisions
of Section  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the State of  Delaware.  We
further declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of Delaware
that the matters set forth in this  certificate  are true and correct of our own
knowledge.

Date:  December 1, 1997                /s/Thomas R. Brooksbank
                                     By:  Thomas R. Brooksbank
                                     Its: President


                                       /s/George G. Chachas
                                     By:  George G. Chachas
                                     Its: Secretary
50184.

#### ROYAL v. THE STATE.

Evans, Judge.

The defendant was convicted of theft of lost or mislaid property. He was sentenced to serve five years. Defendant appeals. *Held:*

The sole ground of complaint is that the state failed to prove every essential element of the crime with which defendant was charged. The property in question (bulk copper tubing) was never "lost” or "mislaid,” and counsel for the state concedes this point in his brief. However, the state argues that it did prove the copper tubing was stolen from the owner by first removing it from his property, hiding same in bushes, and the thieves later returned and got it. One of them was caught, while trying to sell the stolen copper tubing.

Clearly the state proved by its own witness that the property was neither lost or mislaid but was actually stolen. Every essential element of the crime charged must be established. Code Ann. § 26-501; *Stebbins v. State,*78 Ga. App. 534, 536 (51 SE2d 592); *Johnson v. State,*122 Ga. App. 769 (2) (178 SE2d 772). In *Moore v. State,*130 Ga. App. 186 (202 SE2d 556), this court held that while there was ample evidence to convict the defendant of burglary of a building, the state failed to prove the burglary of the building described in the indictment, but the proof was as to a building owned by someone else; and the conviction was reversed. Before a conviction will stand it must be a legal conviction. Defendant was not charged with the crime he committed, but with one which he did not commit.

Black’s Law Dictionary defines "mislay” as follows: "To deposit in a place not afterwards recollected; to lose anything by forgetfulness of the place where it was laid.” This same work defines "lost property” as: "Property which the owner has involuntarily parted with and does not know where to find or recover it. . .”

Clearly one cannot lose or mislay property unless he first owns or has possession of that property.

In the case sub judice the property in question was not alleged to have been owned or possessed by the defendant; but it was property of *another.*Hence de*204fendant could not mislay or lose it, until he first owned it or possessed it. The owner in this case testified that the goods were not *mislaid or lost,*but were *stolen.*

Submitted February 10, 1975

Decided March 6, 1975.

*Greenholtz & Hind, H. T. Greenholtz, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William S. Lee, District Attorney, Daniel MacDougald, III, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

*Judgment reversed.*

*Been, P. J., and Stolz, J., concur.*
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Power Cy cle 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 

### 0 $ 85.00 

### 855 $ 72,675.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in complia nce: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 72,675 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Costs:** 

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty cos ts) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for

aircra ft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :