alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e J . M i c ha e l S e abr i ght , U ni t e d S t at e s D i s tr i c tJudge f or ** the D i s tr i c tof

H a w a i i , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** * w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. PE DRO ENRI QU E M EDRANO - CR UZ, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 10046 D. C . No . 4 : 0 3 - c r - 0 0 6 5 8 - C KJ ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J . M i c ha e l S e abr i ght , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng **

S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 *** B e f o r e : H A W K I N S , M c K E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . P e dr o E nr i que M e dr a no- C ruz appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntand c h a lle n g e s th e 2 4 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e dup o n r e v o c a tio n o f s up e rv is e dr e le a s e . 

# FI LED JU N 13 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10046 2 P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), M edrano -C ruz’ s c ou nsel h a s f ile dab r ie f

s ta tin g th a t th e r e ar e n o g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f , a lo n g w ith am o tio n to w ith d r a w a s c o u n s e l o f

r e c o r d . W e h a v e p r o v id e dM e d r an o - C ru z th e o p p o rtu n ity t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef h a s b e e n f

ile d . M e dr a no- C ruz ha s w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d upon r e v o c a tio n o f

s up e rv is e dr e le a s e . O u rin d e p e n d e n t r e v ie w o f th e r e c o r dp u r s u an t to P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80 ( 1988) , di s c l os e s no a r guabl e i s s ue a s t o the v a lid ityo f

th e w a iv e r . Se e U

ni te d States v . W

at s on , 58 2 F . 3d 97 4, 98 6-88 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. AF F I RME D.
#### FRED SETTOON, INC. v. PBR OFFSHORE MARINE CORP. FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK OF BATON ROUGE v. Fred A. SETTOON, Shirley P. Settoon and PBR Offshore Marine Corp.

No. 87-CC-0395.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 19, 1987.

In re Fred Settoon, Inc., Fred A. Settoon, Shirley P. Settoon, applying for supervisory writs of certiorari, review and prohibí*105tion, from the Twenty-third Judicial District Court, Parish of Assumption, Nos. 16821, 17055, First Circuit Court of Appeal, No. CW/87/0209.

Writ and stay order denied.
#### Antonio R. VINES, Appellant, v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, and Durbin Paper Company, Appellee.

No. 87-105.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Feb. 9, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 17, 1988.

Antonio R. Vines, in pro. per.

Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, General Counsel, and John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for Florida Unemployment Appeals Com’n.

No appearance for Durbin Paper Co.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 120.57(1)(b)(9), Fla.Stat. (1985); *Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation,*475 So.2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16567]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6802]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978, Public Law 95-541.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nadene G. Kennedy, Permit Office, 
Office of Polar Programs, Rm. 755, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 9 and February 13, 2012 
respectively, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the 
Federal Register of permit applications received. The permits were 
issued on March 16, 2012 to:
    Robert A. Blanchette, Permit No. 2012-013;
    H. William Detrich, III, Permit No. 2012-014;
    Laurie Connell, Permit No. 2012-015.

Nadene G. Kennedy,
Permit Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6802 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2025 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2025

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Methyl-2-
              (methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Methyl-2-
              (methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-METHYL-2-(METHYLETHYL)CYCLOHEXYL-2-HYDROXYPROPANOATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Methyl-2-
(methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         415,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,370,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (336,486)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,088,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,229,644<F1>
<PP&E>                                       1,480,182
<DEPRECIATION>                               (887,122)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,976,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,659,153
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,366
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,315,412<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,976,931
<SALES>                                     27,632,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,632,245
<CGS>                                       19,654,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,654,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,342,241
<PAGE>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             248,255<F4>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,306,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                   493,514
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            813,377
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   813,377
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.
<F2>INCLUDES THE COST OF 207,100 COMMON SHARES IN TREASURY OF $537,544.
<F3>INCLUDES A SPECIAL CHARGE OF $80,000 FOR THE CLOSURE OF THE COMPANY'S CORPUS
CHRISTI, TEXAS LOCATION.
<F4>INCLUDES INTEREST EXPENSE OF $258,079 AND INTEREST INCOME AND OTHER, NET OF
$9,824.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### DON SUNTAN CORPORATION, etc., Appellant, v. TANNING RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC., etc., Appellee.

No. 86-1063.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

April 9, 1987.

David A. Vukelja of Moore, Wood, Simpson & Korey, Ormond Beach, for appellant.

John J. Upchurch of Leonhardt & Up-church, P.A., Daytona Beach, and James R. MeGibbon and Richard L. Robbins of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennon, Atlanta, for ap-pellee.

*36PER CURIAM.

In *Tanning Research Laboratories, Inc. v. Don Suntan Corp.,*482 So.2d 410 (Fla. 5th DCA), *rev. denied,*491 So.2d 278 (1986), this court construed an agreement between the parties and reversed a judgment in favor of Don Suntan that was based on a different construction of the agreement. After our decision, on remand, Don Suntan moved to amend its complaint to assert new counts based on a new position to recover damages for breach of the agreement as construed by this court. Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of this post appeal motion to amend. We affirm.

In order to prevent later events in the trial court from circumventing or “mooting” the binding aspect of an appellate adjudication, the general rule is that once an appeal has been taken, the decision on appeal becomes “the law of the case,” and, on remand, amendments to the pleadings cannot be made to present new and different issues of fact or law unless the appellate court in its opinion has authorized such amendments.1 Our prior decision did not authorize any amendments to the complaint on remand. Therefore Don Suntan’s motion to amend was properly denied by the trial court.

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

1

. *See e.g. Coudry v. City of Titusville,*438 So.2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); *Grady v. Grady,*395 So.2d 643 (Fla. 4th DCA), *rev. denied,*402 So.2d 610 (Fla.1981); *Florida Air Conditioners, Inc. v. Colonial Supply Co.,*390 So.2d 174 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). In rare instances, appellate courts authorize amendments on remand which are perceived to be necessary in the interests of justice and which will not circumvent the appellate decision. Such amendments, when permitted, should not permit circumvention of the appellate decision or prior valid adjudication in the trial court, should not be inconsistent or repugnant to the allegations in the original pleadings, should not change or abandon the nature of the issues framed by the pleadings, and should not introduce a new theory of recovery or defense not theretofore asserted. *Florida Air Conditioners, Inc., supra.*
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16249]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6717]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; ITVA Conflicts.
    Date: April 3, 2012.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: David W. Miller, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6140, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-9734, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f09d999c9c95829491b09d91999cde9e9998de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="54393d3838312630351439353d387a3a3d3c7a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-6717 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.7


 


Lease Agreement


 


Lessor (Party A): Hangzhou Nongyuan Network
Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Leasee (Party B): Hangzhou Forasen Technology
Co., Ltd.


 


The following agreements are reached after
friendly negotiation based on the reciprocal principle of both parties:


 


Article 1:


 


Party A leases the real estate located
at Room 1804-1 Dikai Yinzuo, No. 29 East Jiefang Road, Jianggan District, Hangzhou with a construction area of 93.5 square meters
to Party B.


 


Article 2:


 


Parties B agrees that the real estate shall
be leased for office use only.


 


Article 3:


 


The lease term shall be 5 years, from August
5, 2020, to August 4, 2022.


Upon expiration of the lease term
agreed herein, if Party B intends to renew the lease, it shall propose the renewal to Party A two months prior to the expiration
date of the lease. If both parties agree upon the renewal of the lease, they shall conclude a contract separately.


If Party A wants to terminate the lease
agreement before expiration, it shall notify Party B two months prior to the terminate date.


 


Article 4:


 


The rent for the leased real estate is
RMB283,258.25 per year, RMB 8.3 per square meters per day. The rent shall be paid semi-annually.


 


Article 5:


 


Party A is responsible for the repair and
maintenance of the real estate caused by non-artificial reasons during the lease term.


Any third party will be held liable for
cause damages to the real estate and attached facilities.


Party B shall make proper use of the real
estate.


Party B is responsible for the repair and
maintenance of the real property caused by its own or affiliates.


 


Article 6:


 


Party B shall not sublet or exchange the
leased real estate to a third party without the consent from Party A.


 






     


     


    

 


Article 7:


 


Any matter not covered herein shall be
agreed upon separately by both parties in the amendment of this agreement.


This agreement is made in duplicate with
one copy held by each party with the same legal force.


 


Party A (Signature & Seal): /s/ Hangzhou
Nongyuan Network Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Date: August 5, 2020


 


Party B (Signature & Seal): /s/ Hangzhou
Forasen Technology Co., Ltd.


 


Date: August 5, 2020
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro MARTINEZ-PATRICIO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7652.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 29, 2003.

Decided June 3, 2003.

Pedro Martinez-Patricio, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Pedro Martinez-Patricio seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martinez-Patricio has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: March 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Dror Gad
Dror GadChief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 18, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2143 Lower Tribunal No. F19-21138

________________ 

### Christopher Alan Rosario,

Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Anne Stuzin, Judge. Christopher Alan Rosario, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before MILLER, LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 12
                             MERCURY FINANCE COMPANY

<TABLE>
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<CAPTION>

Year Ended December 31 (dollars in thousands)

                                  1995               1994             1993             1992             1991 

<S>                               <C>                <C>              <C>              <C>              <C>
Net Income                        $74,129            $86,545          $64,927          $45,723          $32,816

Added fixed charges:
  Cost of Borrowing                57,303             39,375           32,993           29,525           28,796
  One-third of rentals              1,370              1,056              873              635              536

  Total fixed charges:            $58,673            $40,431          $33,806          $30,160          $29,332


   Provisions for
     income taxes:
   Federal                         38,895             46,797           34,634           23,914           17,429
   State                            7,084              7,648            5,306            4,025            3,257

   Total income taxes             $45,979            $54,445          $39,940          $27,939          $20,686


   Total "earnings"
     (net income,
     fixed charges and
     income taxes)               $178,781           $181,421         $138,673         $103,822          $82,834


Ratio of "earnings" to fixed
 charges                             3.05               4.49             4.10             3.44             2.82

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32


CERTIFICATION


OF


PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
WenXiang Ding, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of China Energy Corporation for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of China Energy Corporation.




I, Fu Xu,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China
Energy Corporation for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of China Energy Corporation.




By:
            /s/ WenXiang DingWenXiang
      DingChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)








By:
                /s/
      Fu XuFu
      XuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  October 15,
2009





29
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Warren B. Kanders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: March 12, 2004                           By: /s/ Warren B. Kanders
                                                  ------------------------------

                                               Name: Warren B. Kanders
                                               Title: Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00326-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.D.A., JR., 

AND C.B.C.A., CHILDREN

------------

FROM THE 431ST DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant's Voluntary Motion To Dismiss.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J. 

DELIVERED: February 28, 2013