Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2012 / Notices 15357 

1C2H8O7P2 or C(CH3)(OH)(PO3H2)2. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of 

February 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6300 Filed 3–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1816] 

Reorganization/Expansion of ForeignTrade Zone 106 under Alternative Site 

Framework, Oklahoma City, OK 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) in 

December 2008 (74 FR 1170–1173, 01/ 

12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/22/ 

2009; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/2010) 

as an option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Port Authority of Greater 

Oklahoma City, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 106, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket 

20–2011, filed 3/15/2011) for authority 

to reorganize and expand under the ASF 

with a service area of Blaine, Caddo, 

Canadian, Cleveland, Comanche, Custer, 

Garfield, Garvin, Grady, Kay, Kingfisher, 

Lincoln, Logan, McClain, Noble, 

Oklahoma, Payne, Pontotoc, 

Pottawatomie, Seminole and Stephens 

Counties, Oklahoma, within and 

adjacent to the Oklahoma City Customs 

and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 

106’s existing Sites 1 (as combined with 

Site 8), 12 and 13 would be categorized 

as magnet sites, existing Sites 2 and 14 

would be categorized as usage-driven 

sites, and the grantee proposes two new 

magnet sites (Sites 15 and 16); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (76 FR 15290–15291, 3/21/ 

2011) and the application has been 

processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize and 

expand FTZ 106 under the alternative 

site framework is approved, subject to 

the FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations, 

including Section 400.28, to the Board’s 

standard 2,000-acre activation limit for 

the overall general-purpose zone 

project, to a five-year ASF sunset 

provision for magnet sites that would 

terminate authority for Sites 12, 13, 15 

and 16 if not activated by February 28, 

2017, and to a three-year ASF sunset 

provision for usage-driven sites that 

would terminate authority for Sites 2 

and 14 if no foreign-status merchandise 

is admitted for a bona fide customs 

purpose by February 28, 2015. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of 

February 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6299 Filed 3–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–847] 

1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1- 

Diphosphonic Acid From India: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 16, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (Department) 

published the preliminary results of the 

second administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 1- 

Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic 

Acid from India. The review covers one 

manufacturer/exporter of the subject 

merchandise to the United States: 

Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd. 

(Aquapharm). The period of review 

(POR) is April 1, 2010, through March 

31, 2011. The final weighted-average 

dumping margin for the manufacturer/ 

exporter is listed below in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger or Brandon Custard, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 2, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4136 or (202) 482– 

1823, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The review covers one manufacturer/ 

exporter of the subject merchandise to 

the United States: Aquapharm. 

On December 16, 2011, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

second administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 1- 

Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic 

Acid from India (76 FR 78237). 

We invited parties to comment on the 

preliminary results of the review. No 

interested party submitted comments. 

Therefore, the final results do not differ 

from the preliminary results. The 

Department has conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order includes all grades of aqueous, 

acidic (non-neutralized) concentrations 

of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1- 

diphosphonic acid 1 also referred to as 

hydroxethlylidenediphosphonic acid, 

hydroxyethanediphosphonic acid, 

acetodiphosphonic acid, and etidronic 

acid. The CAS (Chemical Abstract 

Service) registry number for HEDP is 

2809–21–4. The merchandise subject to 

this order is currently classified in the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) at subheading 

2931.00.9043. It may also enter under 

HTSUS subheading 2811.19.6090. 

While HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes 

only, the written description of the 

scope of this order is dispositive. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of our review, we 

determined that the following weightedaverage margin percentage applies for 

the period April 1, 2010, through March 

31, 2011: 

Manufacturer/Exporter Margin 

(percent) 

Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt., Ltd 0.00 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.212. The Department 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES