alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Financial
Services Corp. (the "Company') for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin J. Sheehan, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


     /s/Kevin J. Sheehan
----------------------------------
Kevin J. Sheehan
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer


February 27, 2003


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Investors Financial
Services Corp. (the "Company') for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John N. Spinney, Jr., Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


     /s/John N. Spinney, Jr.
----------------------------------
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


February 27, 2003
### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

## ?'1!7 ' 

## 3**()D~A,Jll)IQ:ENT** 

### OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL AND SCOT SPENCER AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. AND RICHARD BERNARD Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive Practices and UnfairMethods ofCompetition, and Violations ofPublic CharterRules EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and Violations ofPublic CharterRules Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT DOT-OST-1995-272 formerly Docket 49233

The Office ofthe Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order staying this proceeding, files this report detailingthe current status ofthis proceeding and settlement negotiations. The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004- 17486.2 There have been no further settlement discussions. Date: August 31,2012.

Respectfully submitted,

# ,-5:>~ Samuel Podberesky Assistant General Counsel for '

Senior Trial Attorney United States Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Enforcement and Proceedings 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Room 96-429 Washington, D.C. 20590 

### TEL: 202-366-9342 FAX: 202-366-7152

### 3

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 I hereby certifythat on this 31st day ofAugust, 2012, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: Original U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 By First Class Mail The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation Washington, D.C. 20590 TEL: (202) 366-2142 FAX: (202) 366-7536 ByFirst Class Mail Scot Spencer SBD Aircraft Services 255 S Leland Norton Way Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
#### STATE ex rel. Carlos GRANT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 86-KH-2546.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 13, 1987.

In re Grant, Carlos; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 236483.

Denied.
#### Kelly HUGHLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-567.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1988.

*454James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Michael L. O’Neill, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

The judgment and sentence herein are affirmed, without prejudice however, to the right of the defendant to present the cost issue to the trial court. *See Reynolds v. State,*516 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COWART, J., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Frederick Alden CABLER.

No. 87-KK-2106.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Cabler, Frederick Alden; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 98369; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW87-0368.

Granted and remanded to the Court of Appeal for briefing, argument and an opinion.
#### Edward A. MOORE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 88-2746, 88-2815.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Nov. 16, 1988.

*925PER CURIAM.

Edward Moore appeals the denial of two motions for postconviction relief. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Both appeals revolve around the same grievance. Moore, who entered a plea of guilty to insurance fraud, was ordered to pay $1,150 in restitution and public defender fees. He states that he was led to believe this sum would be deducted from approximately $3,000 in traveler’s checks seized in connection with his arrest, the remainder to be returned to him. This was not done and the money allegedly remains in the possession of the arresting police agency.

In case number 88-2746 Moore attacks the voluntariness of his plea to the criminal charges. Several separate grounds for relief are asserted, the most significant of which concerns counsel’s alleged promise that Moore would get some of his money back. The trial court, denying Moore’s motion to withdraw his plea, attached the plea colloquy, wherein no mention was made by Moore of any inducements for the plea other than the length of sentence. Based on this we affirm the trial court’s order.

Case number 88-2815 stems from the denial of Moore’s motion to return property, directed toward the excess money. A court has the inherent power to direct the return of property seized from a criminal defendant, if it is no longer needed as evidence against him. *Garmire v. Red Lake,*265 So.2d 2 (Fla.1972); *Estevez v. Gordon,*386 So.2d 43 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Except where property taken pursuant to a warrant is concerned, in which instance section 933.14, Florida Statutes (1987), governs, there are no established methods for exercising this inherent power. *Estevez.*Nonetheless, the power continues to exist after the underlying criminal case has terminated. *Sawyer v. Gable,*400 So.2d 992 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). A separate civil suit is not required. In the event the court refuses to act, the proper remedy is a petition for writ of mandamus. *Estevez.*

In the present case we are not persuaded that resort to a writ of mandamus is called for. The trial court’s order refers to previous correspondence between Moore and the court wherein Moore is alleged to have “forfeited” all of the money in question. We find no indication in the record before us that Moore intended to do this. Rather than our treating the matter now before us as a petition for writ of mandamus, we remand for the trial court to con*926duct further proceedings to determine whether any basis exists for the retention of Moore’s traveler’s checks, or, alternatively, whether Moore has omitted from his motion pertinent facts that would call for a different result. Only if this matter cannot be resolved within a reasonable amount of time will we be disposed to entertain a formal petition for writ of mandamus.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Patrick Boland <boland@lava.net>

Wednesday, October 30, 2013 8:03 PM

EAS(OST)

EASservice for Kalaupapa, Molokai, Hawaii

Faulk, Scott (OST)

Aloha,

I have been traveling between Honolulu and Kalaupapa for more than 40 years. Currently I go to Kalaupapa about twice

a month, where I am one of the tour drivers for Damien Tours, the only tour in the settlement/National Park.

I strongly support the service provided by Makani Kai. The entire operation is reliable and professional. The schedule is

structured around the needs ofthe residents and visitors. The prices are reasonable. The pilots and other staff are not

only professional, they are family.

The previous provider was a disaster, with prices and "service" that made Kalaupapa almost inaccessible. It has been a

great relief these past few years to have the solid and quality service provided by Makani Kai.

I certainly recommend that Makani Kai continue as the EASprovider for Kalaupapa.

Thank you,

Patrick Boland

1
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 7, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
        10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
        Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Anthony
                C. PintsopoulosAnthony C. Pintsopoulos
                Principal Financial OfficerMay
                12,
                2006
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

EXHIBIT 21.1



Name of Subsidiary of Aearo Corporation          State or Other Jurisdiction of
                                                 Incorporation
---------------------------------------          ----------------------------

Aearo Company                                    Delaware
Cabot Safety Intermediate Corporation            Delaware
CSC FSC, Inc.                                    Virgin Islands
Aearo Canada Ltd.                                Canada
Aearo SRL                                        Italy
Aearo Proteccion Laboral SA                      Spain
Aearo SARL                                       France
Aearo do Brasil Ltda.                            Brazil
Aearo Peltor AB                                  Sweden
Peltor Holding AB                                Sweden
Peltor LP Invest AB                              Sweden
Peltor AB                                        Sweden
Aearo Ltd.                                       United Kingdom
Peltor Ltd.                                      United Kingdom
Aearo GMBH                                       Germany
Peltor SARL                                      France
Peltor Forvaltnings AB                           Sweden
Peltor Communications A/S                        Norway
Peltor AG                                        Switzerland
EXHIBIT 12

MERCURY FINANCE COMPANY

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

Year Ended December 31 (dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                   1996              1995              1994              1993             1992 

<S>                               <C>               <C>                <C>              <C>              <C>    
Net income/(loss)                 (28,968)          $74,129            $86,545          $64,927          $45,723

Added fixed charges:
  Cost of Borrowing                64,789            57,303             39,375           32,993           29,525
  One-third of rentals              1,464             1,370              1,056              873              635

  Total fixed charges:            $66,253           $58,673            $40,431          $33,806          $30,160


   Provisions/(credits) for
     income taxes:
   Federal                        (18,604)           38,895             46,797           34,634           23,914
   State                           (1,811)            7,084              7,648            5,306            4,025

   Total income taxes            ($20,415)          $45,979            $54,445          $39,940          $27,939


   Total "earnings"
     (net income/(loss),
     fixed charges and
     income taxes)                $16,870          $178,781           $181,421         $138,673         $103,822


Ratio of "earnings" to fixed
 charges                             0.25              3.05               4.49             4.10             3.44


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Neil Smith, as Group Finance Director of Telewest Communications plc (the
Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | ----------------------
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 18, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Neil Smith
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Name:             |  | Neil Smith            
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Title:            |  | Group Finance Director



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
December 29, 2015 

Dear Mr. Heaphy: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−2059). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by MM/DD/YY. If 

we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-XXXX. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
302 CERTIFICATION

I, W. Ross C. Corace, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the amendment to the quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB of MailTec, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

         4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
12a-14) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information  relating to the registrant,  including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
entities, particularly  during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2006                /s/W. Ross C. Corace
                                   ----------------------------
                                   W. Ross C. Corace
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jammin Java Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anh Tran, the President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Reporting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 20, 2010





Anh Tran





/s/ Anh Tran


(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and


Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with this Quarterly  Report of Utilicraft  Aerospace  Industries,
Inc. (the  "Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Randy Moseley,  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: November 19, 2008

By: /s/ Randy Moseley
    -----------------
 Randy Moseley,
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2196 

To suspend temporarily the duty on powdered ion exchange resin comprising 

a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, sulphonic acid, 

sodium form. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on powdered ion exchange 

resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 

divinylbenzene, sulphonic acid, sodium form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POWDERED ION EXCHANGE RESIN COM4 PRISING A COPOLYMER OF STYRENE 

5 CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, 

6 SULPHONIC ACID, SODIUM FORM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.34 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 powdered ion exchange resin comprising a copolymer of 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2196 IS

1 styrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, sulphonic acid, so2 dium form) is amended to read as follows: 

‘‘ 9902.02.34 Powdered ion exchange resin 

comprised of a copolymer of 

styrene, cross linked with 

divinyl-benzene, further reacted to provide sulfonic acid 

functionality (sodium form), 

having a nominal particle size 

of 0.075 mm to 0.150 mm, 

dried to a moisture content of 

not more than 10% (CAS 

No. 63182–08–1) (provided 

for in subheading 

3914.00.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JEFFREY PERRY

*Suzanne Zitser,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Lisa Herskowitz,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 193 (AC 16716), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.