alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2368

TONY TYSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LOUIS CALDERA, Secretary of the Army, The

Pentagon,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-411-2)

Submitted: May 15, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Michael Robinson, Cameron Robinson Kourtesis, Washington,

D.C.; Sol Z. Rosen, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Helen F.

Fahey, United States Attorney, Lawrence R. Leonard, Managing

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Tyson appeals the district court’s order granting summary

judgment to Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, in

his employment discrimination action because Tyson failed to timely

file an Equal Employment Opportunity charge. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Tyson v. Caldera, No. CA-00-411-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 10, 2000);

see 29 C.F.R. § 1614, 105(a); Young v. National Ctr. for Health

Serv. Research, 828 F.2d 235, 237 (4th Cir. 1987). We deny Tyson’s

motion to stay this appeal pending resolution of a complaint

pending with the District of Columbia Office of Bar Counsel. We

grant Tyson’s counsel’s motion to withdraw from further representation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Advisory Committee to the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has been renewed for a 2-year period through February 1, 2014.

For information, contact Carmen Villar, M.S.W., Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee to the Director, CDC, HHS, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop D-14, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/639-7000 or fax 404/639-7111.

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: March 13, 2012.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2012-6637 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57981-57982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-23943]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

National Coal Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the National Coal Council 
(NCC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 
770) requires that public notice of these meetings be announced in the 
Federal Register.

DATES: Friday, October 21, 2011, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Embassy Suites Convention Center, 900 10th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Ducker, U.S. Department of 
Energy; 4G-036/Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: (202) 586-7810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of Meeting: To conduct an open meeting of the NCC and to 
provide an update of the current NCC study.

Tentative Agenda

     Welcome and Call to Order by NCC Chair.
     Keynote address by Secretary Steven Chu, Department of 
Energy.
     Presentation by Phil Ren on the Northeast Asia Coal 
Exchange Center.
     Presentation by Barry Worthington, President of the U.S. 
Energy Agency.
     Presentation by Lynn Sprague, National Museum of Forest 
Service History, on reforestation and reclamation of mine lands.
     Council Business.
     Adjourn.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any potential items on the agenda, you should 
contact Michael J. Ducker, (202) 586-7810 or Michael.Ducker@HQ.DOE.GOV 
(e-mail). You must make your request for an oral statement at least 5 
business days before

[[Page 57982]]

the meeting. Reasonable provision will be made to include the scheduled 
oral statements on the agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will 
conduct the meeting to facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The NCC will prepare meeting minutes within 45 days of the 
meeting. The minutes will be posted on the NCC Web site at http://www.nationalcoalcouncil.org/.

    Issued: September 13, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-23943 Filed 9-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
ex_212441.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


OUTSIDE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PACKAGE


 


Effective January 1, 2021, Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) will pay each outside director who is independent in accordance with the NASDAQ and SEC rules governing director independence (an “Eligible Director”) the following for service to the Company:


 


	
			Annual Cash Retainer

				 	$	50,000	 
	
			Attendance Fee for Each Board Meeting (including telephonic attendance)

				 	$	3,000	 
	
			Attendance Fee for Each Committee Meeting (including telephonic attendance)

				 	$	1,500	 



 


In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $25,000.  The Chairman of each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Compensation Committee will receive an additional annual fee of $10,000.   The Annual Cash Retainer and the Committee Chair fees will be paid semi-annually.


 


Each Eligible Director also will receive a restricted stock award of 4,000 shares, such grant to be effective on January 2, 2021.  The restricted stock award will vest in two equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date. 


 


The Company also will reimburse all reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenses that are incurred in connection with board and committee meetings.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2361 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Butylated reaction product of p-cresol 

and DCPD (dicyclopentadiene). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Butylated reaction 

product of p-cresol and DCPD (dicyclopentadiene). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUTYLATED REACTION PRODUCT OF P-CRESOL 

4 AND DCPD (DICYCLOPENTADIENE). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Butylated reaction product of 

p-cresol and DCPD 

(dicyclopentadiene) (CAS No. 

68610–51–5) (provided for in 

subheading 3812.30.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2361 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Capital Return
                    Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety 
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               0000846176
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Capital Return Futures Fund
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          3,166,467

<SECURITIES>                    12,100,542

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,267,009

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,267,009

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           529,721

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      14,737,288

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,267,009

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,704,817

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,963,393

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (258,576)

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (2.39)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### STATE ex rel. Glen A. HEBERT v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0690.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Hebert, Glen A.; applying for remedial writ; Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 34515.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Luke McGOWAN.

No. 86-KK-2393.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re McGowan, Luke; applying for writ of review; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 134893; to *87the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18-747-KW.

Denied. La.Code Criminal Procedure art. 841 does not apply but the result is correct.

DIXON, C.J.,

concurs. There was no violation of the contemporaneous objection rule. However, the defense attorney cites the transcript of the preliminary hearing for the very statements which he seeks in the Brady motion. He already has what he seeks.
#### Diane CARNESECCA, widow, et al. of Carl Allen Carnesecca, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. WASATCH BANK OF PLEASANT GROVE and/or State Insurance Fund, and the Industrial Commission, Defendants.

No. 19792.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Aug. 16, 1984.

*477Carmen E. Kipp, Heinz J. Mahler, Salt Lake City, for plaintiffs.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Dennis Y. Lloyd, Salt Lake City, for State Ins. Fund.

James R. Black, Fred R. Silvester, Salt Lake City, for Wasatch Bank.

PER CURIAM:

After a plenary hearing followed by the steps necessary for review, the claimants (plaintiffs) seek reversal of the Commission’s denial of workmen’s compensation death benefits.

The administrative law judge found that no benefits were payable since the decedent was not in the course of his employment at the time he was killed. The evidence was clear that the decedent was killed in a plane crash after he had been invited to go elk hunting with his brother-in-law, Savage. The latter furnished the plane and supplied all the expenses incident to its use.

The law judge found that decedent was vice president of the defendant bank and had been for twenty years before the accident. It was conceded that the decedent had an expense account to stimulate business and access to a golf club, where he entertained prospective customers. On occasion he took potential customers to athletic events at the bank’s expense.

Decedent had mostly a social, but also a business relationship with Savage. Since long before the bank’s inception, they annually went on elk hunts, fishing trips, dove and pheasant hunts and the like. On the day of the tragedy, there was no discussion of business.

The facts adduced reasonably could justify a finding that the trip was purely social and quite removed from a search for business. Both sides analyze the specifics and implications of two of our recent decisions involving trips by company representatives.1 Neither is dispositive factually, but the principles espoused by both are applicable. From the' facts found by the lower tribunal in the instant case, which we must respect on review if not tortured by indiscretion of the tribunal, the elk hunt was not within the course of decedent’s employment. We are constrained to hold that, under either of the cases cited, the history and facts of the ease here point clearly to a social, not business, relationship prevailing at the time of the accident involved.

The Commission’s denial of benefits is affirmed without costs on appeal.

1

. *Martinson v. W-M Insurance Agency,*Utah, 606 P.2d 256 (1980); *Ogden Standard Examiner v. Industrial Commission,*Utah, 663 P.2d 88 (1983).
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerNovember
      10, 2010
#### Herman H. DETER v. UNITED STATES. George F. McKENNEY v. UNITED STATES. Ira S. GIFFORD v. UNITED STATES. Charles S. BONNELL v. UNITED STATES. Patrick J. HOLMES v. UNITED STATES. Harry G. DALTON v. UNITED STATES.

Nos. 8455-8460.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1940.

C. M. Vrooman and Francis J. Amer, both of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.

E. B. Freed, U. S. Atty., of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The court having considered the application of appellants to dismiss the appeal in each of these cases, it is now ordered that the appeals in these cases be and the same are dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 234

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``Colonel 
              John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2009

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``Colonel 
              John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL JOHN H. WILSON, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Colonel John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |                                                                                                                                                               |   |
| May      20, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Curt      Thornton                                                                                                                                        |   |
|              |   | Curt      Thornton                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|              |   | Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial      Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) and      Director |   |
Exhibit 35.3SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENTAmerican Express Centurion BankAmerican Express Credit Account Master TrustReporting Period January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of American Express Centurion Bank (“AECB”), awholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”), pursuantto the Supplemental Servicing Agreement dated as of June 30, 2004, between TRS, AECB, AmericanExpress Bank, FSB, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC, American ExpressReceivables Financing Corporation IV LLC, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II(the “Agreement”), does hereby certify that:1. AECB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement. 2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate. 3. A review of AECB’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision. 4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AECB has fulfilled all of its obligationsunder the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 22nd day of March,2007.     AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK       By: /s/ Catherine M. Hogan  Name: Catherine M. Hogan  Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK       By: /s/ Scott C. Godderidge  Name: Scott C. Godderidge  Title: Vice President – Finance
<PAGE>



                       Consent of Independent Accountants

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Amendment No. 1 to
registration statement (No. 333-38765) on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to
registration statement (No.333-38759) on Form S-4 and registration statement
(No. 333-71063) on Form S-8 of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated March 5,
1999, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Armor Holdings,
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and for the year then ended, which appears on page
F-2 of this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10K of Armor Holdings, Inc. We also consent
to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts."


                                            /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Jacksonville, Florida
May 28, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to the
best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                                                                                  
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 4, 2007 |  | /s/ CHARLES K. NARANG                                                                            
|                  |  | Charles K. Narang Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.