alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2019

s0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2019

154158

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154158

COA: 332838

Livingston CC: 15

- 022793

- FC

JOSEPH MICHAEL KUZMA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of May 29, 2018, the application for leave to a ppeal the June 22, 2016

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v

Ames (Docket No. 156077). On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been denied in

Ames on June 26, 2019, 504 Mich ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it

is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be

reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1



RADIANT SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this amended annual
report of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Heyman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|            |  |     |  |                                       
|----------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|May 2, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ John H. Heyman                    
|            |  |     |  | John H. Heyman Chief Executive
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 1020 Holland Sylvania Road, Holland, OH 43528, has been approved to gauge petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories:                         *http://cbp.gov/​linkhandler/​cgov/​trade/​automated/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​gaulist.ctt/​gaulist.pdf.*

# DATES:

The approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger became effective on July 26, 2011. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2014.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Mike McCormick, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2012-5741 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### Burton H. Sheldon, Respondent, *v.*Frank McFee et al., Appellants.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars cosIs. (See 216 N. Y. 618.)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10592 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RANDY DALE WARREN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:91-CR-339-P

- - - - - - - - - - January 20, 1997 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Randy Dale Warren appeals the district court’s decision to revoke his supervised release and his sentence. Warren contends that the district court denied him the right to confront and cross-examine an adverse witness at his revocation hearing. The district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking Warren’s supervised release. United States v. McCormick , 54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 264 (1995). TheNo. 96-10592 - 2 - record supports the district court’s implicit finding that good cause existed to admit the evidence without allowing Warren the opportunity to confront and cross-examine the witness. United States v. Grandlund , 71 F.3d 507, 510 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 1031 (1996). Any error in the district court’s evidentiary ruling was harmless. Kotteakos v. United States , 328 U.S. 750, 765 (1946). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.7


 


确认函


Confirmation Letter


 


本人,徐舜君,中国公民,公民身份号码为320581,系拥有上海聚好信息技术有限公司(“乙方”)1.9402%出资(“本人股权”)的股东。本人曾于2019年11月
1日 签署授权委托书(“授权委托书”)不可撤销地授予香港聚好科技有限公司或其指定的子公司(“甲方”)
就本人股权行使有关股东权利。2020年10月10日甲方同意乙方引入新股东,本人股权从2%稀释为1.9402%。本人确认授权委托书始终有效且具有约束力。


 


I, Xu Shunjun, a Chinese
citizen with Citizen ID number 320581, is a holder of 1.9402% of the entire registered capital and equity ownership in Shanghai
Juhao Information Technology Co.,Ltd. ("Party B") ("My Shareholding"). The Power of Attorney
signed by me on 1 November 2019 ("Power of Attorney") irrevocably authorized Jowell Technology Limited, a Hongkong
company or its designated subsidiary ("Party A") to exercise the shareholder’s rights in relation to My
Shareholding. The introduction of a new shareholder of Party B on October 10,2020, which has been approved by Party A, diluted
My Shareholding from 2% to 1.9418%. I hereby confirm that the Power of Attorney is enforceable and binding.


 


本确认函以中文和英文书就,中英文版本如有冲突,应以中文版为准。


This Confirmation Letter is written in Chinese
and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.


 


	 	签署:
	 	By:	/s/Xu Shunjun
	 	徐舜君 Xu Shunjun
	 	2020年10月10日
#### In re FORFEITURE OF ONE 1973 TWIN-ENGINE BEECHCRAFT BARON AIRPLANE, WHITE WITH BLUE STRIPE, MODEL E-55, U.S. REGISTRATION N511BM, SERIAL NO. TE-916, Together With all Tangible and Intangible Personal Property Found Therein.

No. 4-86-2755.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 15, 1987.

Curtis A. Littman of James F. Littman, P.A., Stuart, for petitioner-James D. Holt, as Sheriff of Martin County, Florida.

No brief filed for respondent.

WALDEN, Judge.

We treat this appeal as a petition for common law certiorari. Fla.R.App.R. 9.040(c). We grant the petition and quash the order dated November 4, 1986, which order stayed the civil forfeiture proceeding against an airplane until the outcome of the criminal charges against the owner of the airplane. *Rowell v. Smith,*342 So.2d 149, 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), *cert. denied,*351 So.2d 408 (Fla.1977).

The petition for certiorari is GRANTED.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: May 13, 2011

/s/ Katherine A. OstruszkaKatherine A. OstruszkaChief Financial Officer & Controller

(Principal Financial & Accounting Officer)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 22, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 22, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A1495. SERENITY BUILDERS AND DEVELOPEMENT, LLC et al. v. LINCOLN COUNTY, GEORGIA.
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On June 11, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than June 21, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2359 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2359

To renew temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
       dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4-2)-129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-
  sulfonato(3)-.kappa.N29, .kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To renew temporarily the suspension of duty on 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
       dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4-2)-129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-
  sulfonato(3)-.kappa.N29, .kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1-OCTADECANAMINIUM, N,N-DIMETHYL-N-OCTADECYL-,(SP-4-2)-
              129H,31H-PHTHALO-CYANINE 2-SULFONATO(3)-.KAPPA.N29, 
              .KAPPAN30,.KAPPA.N31,.KAPPA.N32JCUPRATE(1).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-Octadecanaminium, N,N-
dimethyl-N-octadecyl-,(SP-4-2)-129H,31H-phthalocyanine 2-
sulfonato(3)-.kappa.N29, .kappaN30,.kappa.N31,.kappa.N32Jcuprate(1)) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
---

---

Exhibit 32.2

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: March 7, 2008 |  | /s/ Dror Gad
Dror GadChief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<PAGE>
                                                       Jurisdiction of    
Name of Subsidiary                                     Organization       
------------------                                     ---------------     
NIK Public Safety, Inc.                                Delaware           
Defense Technology Corporation of America              Delaware           
American Body Armor & Equipment, Inc.                  Delaware           
Armor Holdings Properties, Inc.                        Delaware           
Gorandel Trading Limited                               Cyprus             
Armor Holdings Limited                                 England and Wales  
Armor Holdings Venezuela SA                            Venezuela          
Low Voltage Systems Technologies, Inc.                 New Jersey         
Pro-Tech Armored Products of Massachusetts, Inc.       Massachusetts      
Alarm Protection Services, Inc.                        Uganda             
Federal Laboratories, Inc.                             Delaware
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Francis C. EVERAGE.

No. 88-KK-3009.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 27, 1989.

In re Everage, Francis C.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari *1254and/or review, supervisory, -remedial, prohibition, and mandamus writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 79-2422; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KW-0828.

Denied.
#### Newman BUTLER, et al. v. Noah H. BUTLER.

No. 87-C-0361.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Butler, Noah; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86-CA-389; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “M”, No. 291-893.

Denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology, Inc. (the Company)
for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Husband, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ David A. Husband
David A. Husband
Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2005
#### ANTHONY ABRAHAM LEASING, INC., Appellant, v. DEVELOPERS OF AMERICA CORP., Appellee.

No. 86-2801.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

*60Charles F. Atwood, III, Miami, for appellant.

Leoncio E. de la Pena, Hialeah, for appel-lee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and HUBBART, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review vacating a final default judgment against the garnishee is reversed with directions to reinstate the judgment. Although a meritorious defense was asserted, the appellee made no demonstration either of excusable neglect which led to the entry of the default and consequent default judgment, *National Premium Budget Plan Corp. v. All American Assurance Co.,*389 So.2d 324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *Miami Steel Traders, Inc. v. Ryder Truck Lines, Inc.,*401 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), or of due diligence in seeking to set them aside. See *Cricket Club, Inc. v. Basso,*384 So.2d 908 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); *B.R. Fries & Associates v. Meagher,*448 So.2d 1211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), pet. for review denied, 453 So.2d 1364 (Fla.1984); *Bayview Tower Condominium v. Schweizer,*475 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2335

  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on basketballs other than 
                           leather or rubber.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

    Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Bunning, and Mr. Ensign) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary reduction of duty on basketballs other than 
                           leather or rubber.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BASKETBALLS OTHER THAN LEATHER OR RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to basketballs other than 
leather or rubber) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1





                                LOGIC WORKS, INC.

                            LISTING OF  SUBSIDIARIES

                                DECEMBER 31, 1996





Name                                    Jurisdiction
----                                    ------------


Logic Works AG                          Baar, Switzerland
Logic Works Australia PTY LTD           Sydney, Australia
Logic Works GmbH                        Hamburg, Germany
Logic Works International, Inc.         Delaware, USA
Logic Works Limited                     London, England
Logic Works France SARL                 Paris, France
Logic Works Software Inc. -
  Logic Works Logiciel Inc.             New Brunswick, Canada
Logic Works Trading Company Inc.        St. Michael, Barbados
#### Frank W. MERLING, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-649.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Jan. 15, 1988.

Frank W. Merling, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Lauren Hafner Sewell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

CAMPBELL, Acting Chief Judge.

In this appeal we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, however, we strike the imposition of community service in lieu of court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). Appellant’s offense was committed prior to the effective date of the statute.

FRANK and HALL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report of BigString  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report"),  I,
Robert S.  DeMeulemeester,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  do hereby
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of ss.13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. ss.78m or 78o(d), and,

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated:  August 14, 2007                       /s/ Robert S. DeMeulemeester
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert S. DeMeulemeester
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### Barry G. AMMONS, et ux. v. ST. PAUL FIRE *&*MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 88-0471.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1988.

In re Ammons, Barry G.; Ammons, Dina; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-1274; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 134464.

Prior report: La.App., 525 So.2d 60.

Denied.