alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13037 and <greek-i>13038]


Alaska Disaster <greek-i>AK-00024

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Alaska dated 03/13/2012.
    Incident: 2012 Prince William Sound Winter Storm.
    Incident Period: 01/06/2012 through 01/10/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/13/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/14/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/13/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Chugach Reaa.
Contiguous Counties:
    Alaska: City and Borough of Yakutat, Copper River Reaa, Kenai 
Peninsula Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Municipality of 
Anchorage.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      4.125
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.063
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.125
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13037B 
and for economic injury is 130380.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> is Alaska.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-6669 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### Alan LESTER, Appellant, v. KAHN-McKNIGHT COMPANY, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-1423.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Drew S. Sheridan, Miami, for appellant.

Richard J. Burton; Joyce Siemon, North Miami Beach, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

Early in 1980, the appellant Lester was employed as a real estate salesman by the appellee Kahn-McKnight. He was given a $1,000 monthly draw “against commissions.” Six months later, having earned no commissions, Lester left Kahn-McKnight. He signed an agreement promising to repay the $6,000 he had received in draws. In the instant action, Kahn-McKnight sued and won a summary judgment for the $6,000. Lester appeals.

In the absence of a specific undertaking to repay the amount of a draw upon commissions — which did not exist here — the draw is considered as a plain and simple *313salary which, except as a set-off against earnings, the employee has no obligation to return. *Tannen v. Equitable Life Ins. Co.,*303 So.2d 352 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); see also *Placet, Inc. v. Ashton,*368 So.2d 404, 409-10 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979) (promise to pay draw against commissions in future requires payment of amount of draw even if commission is unearned), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 343, 347 (Fla.1979). It follows that Lester’s post-employment written promise was supported by no consideration and was therefore unenforceable as a matter of law.

On this basis, the judgment below is reversed with directions to enter one in Lester’s favor.

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for Capital Mortgage Plus L.P. and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0000845875
<NAME> Capital Mortgage Plus L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>          1
       
<S>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1998
<CASH>          5,491,915
<SECURITIES>          0
<RECEIVABLES>          22,431,054
<ALLOWANCES>          694,061
<INVENTORY>          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>          0
<PP&E>          0
<DEPRECIATION>          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>          28,561,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          82,266
<BONDS>          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>          0
<PREFERRED>          0
<COMMON>          0
<OTHER-SE>          28,479,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          28,561,927
<SALES>          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>          3,104,678
<CGS>          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>          637,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>          2,392,152
<INCOME-TAX>          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          0
<DISCONTINUED>          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>          0
<CHANGES>          0
<NET-INCOME>          2,392,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>          1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>          0
        

</TABLE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2347 

To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Metolachlor. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Metolachlor. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. S-METOLACHLOR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6- 

methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy1-methylethyl)acetamide (sMetolachlor). (CAS No. 

87392–12–9) (as provided for 

in Subheading 2924.29.4700) 6.0% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2347 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                       
                                  EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF ARMANDO IBARRAB

                    INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


      The undersigned indpendent certified public accounting firm hereby 
consents to the inclusion of its report on the financial statements of 
Commercial Labor Management, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 
1997, and to the reference to it as experts in accounting and auditing 
relating to said financial statements, in the Report on Form 10-K, dated 
December 31, 1997.





/s/  ARMANDO IBARRA, C.P.A.
---------------------------------
     Armando Ibarra, C.P.A.


Chula Vista, California
March 31, 1998
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 168 (Monday, August 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 52472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21486]

[[Page 52472]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9933-33-OARM]

National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92463, 
the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gives notice of a public 
meeting of the National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and 
Technology (NACEPT). NACEPT provides advice to the EPA Administrator on 
a broad range of environmental policy, technology, and management 
issues. NACEPT members represent academia, industry, non-governmental 
organizations, and local, state, and tribal governments. The purpose of 
this meeting is for NACEPT to begin developing recommendations to the 
Administrator regarding actions that EPA can take in response to the 
agency's charge on citizen science. A copy of the meeting agenda will 
be posted at http://www2.epa.gov/faca/nacept.

DATES: NACEPT will hold a two-day public meeting on September 28, 2015, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (EST) and September 29, 2015, from 8:30 
a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the EPA Headquarters, William 
Jefferson Clinton Federal Building South, Room 2138 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eugene Green, Designated Federal 
Officer, green.eugene@epa.gov, (202) 564-2432, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Diversity, Advisory Committee Management, and Outreach (MC1601M), 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Requests to make oral comments or to provide 
written comments to NACEPT should be sent to Eugene Green at 
green.eugene@epa.gov by September 21, 2015. The meeting is open to the 
public, with limited seating available on a first-come, first-served 
basis. Members of the public wishing to attend should contact Eugene 
Green via email or by calling (202) 564-2432 no later than September 
21, 2015.
    Meeting Access: Information regarding accessibility and/or 
accommodations for individuals with disabilities, should be directed to 
Eugene Green at the email address or phone number listed above. To 
ensure adequate time for processing, please make requests for 
accommodations at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: August 24, 2015.
Eugene Green,
Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-21486 Filed 8-28-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### Timothy CHILDS v. Thomas FICARA and Louisiana State University.

No. 87-CA-0775.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Oct. 14, 1987.

Jack M. Dampf, Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant Timothy W. Childs.

Paul Marks, Jr., Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee Thomas Ficara.

W. Shelby McKenzie, and Debra Tem-plet, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellee Bd. of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agr. and Mechanical College.

Before LOTTINGER, EDWARDS and ALFORD, JJ.

EDWARDS, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Timothy Childs, has filed a motion to strike the answer filed on behalf of defendants-appellees, Louisiana State University and Thomas Ficara.

Childs filed this suit against Ficara and Ficara’s employer, LSU. After a trial on the merits, the court rendered judgment against Ficara, finding that he had breached a contract in which he promised employment to Childs. However, the court dismissed Childs’ claim against LSU, holding that Ficara had no apparent authority to bind LSU.

Childs appealed the judgment dismissing his suit against LSU. Although Ficara did *553not appeal, an answer styled on behalf of both LSU and Ficara was filed which sought reversal of the judgment against Ficara. Childs moved to strike defendants’ answer, contending that because Childs appealed the judgment only insofar as it dismissed his suit against LSU, Ficara is not an appellee and therefore has no right to file an answer. In its opposition to Childs’ motion, LSU states that its answer was intended to be filed only on its own behalf and not on behalf of Ficara. Consequently Ficara is not a party to this appeal, having neither answered nor appealed.

Childs urges that LSU cannot by its answer obtain a reversal of the judgment against Ficara, since an answer can have no legal effect on one who is not a party to the appeal.

> An appellee shall not be obliged to answer the appeal unless he desires to have the judgment modified, revised, or reversed in part or unless he demands damages against the appellant.... The answer filed by the appellee shall be equivalent to an appeal on his part from any portion of the judgment *rendered against him*in favor of the appellant and of which he complains in his answer.

LSA-C.C.P. art. 2133 (emphasis added).

Under article 2133, an answer does not have the effect of an appeal as to any portion of the judgment rendered either in favor of, or against, a party who has not appealed. *Francois v. Ybarzabal,*483 So.2d 602 (La.1986). The judgment finding Ficara liable was not rendered against LSU, and therefore it cannot be reviewed pursuant to LSU’s answer to the appeal. Consequently, the motion to strike the answer is granted insofar as it seeks reversal of the judgment against Ficara. Nevertheless, this does not necessarily preclude review of *issues*relating to Ficara’s liability. *See Vicknair v. Hibernia Building Corp.,*479 So.2d 904 (La.1985).

MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report dated April 12, 1999, related to the consolidated balance sheet of VSI
Enterprises, Inc. and subsidiaries ("the Company") as of December 31, 1997 and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements (Files Nos. 33-44036,
33-44035, 33-55094, 33-56856, 33-72512, 33-81314, 333-728, 33-85754, 333-15123,
333-18237, 333-18239, 333-30597, 333-44407, and 333-48635).



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
April 12, 1999


                                       83
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-20587

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Carmelo Salazar-Salazar, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-562-1

______________________________

Before Jones, Southwick, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carmelo 

Salazar-Salazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Salazar-Salazar has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 7, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-20587 Document: 42-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2024
No. 23-20587

2

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-20587 Document: 42-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2024
Exhibit 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ron Schutte, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Creative Bakeries, Inc;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c)  presented  in  this  annual  report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;


5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):


         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and


6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.



Date: April 15, 2005


/s/ Ron Schutte
--------------------
Ron Schutte
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
ORIGINA I 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0068 

ASHLEY LeANN TINTINGER, 

Petitioner and Appellee, 

and 

SAMUEL VERNON TINTINGER, 

Respondent and Appellant. 

ORDER 

Through counsel, Appellee Ashley Tintinger (Ashley) moves this Court for 

dismissal of this appeal because self-represented Appellant Samuel Vernon Tintinger 

(Samuel) appeals a Permanent Order of Protection, issued by the Standing Master of the 

Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, without having filed any objections in the 

district court. Samuel did not file a written response to this motion; however, Ashley notes 

Samuel's objection to the motion. 

This Court only recently became aware of the pending motion when the matter was 

sent to the Court for classification after the completion of briefing. This Court attempts to 

handle pending motions in a more expedited manner than this. 

Turning to Ashley's motion, she argues that Samuel's appeal is improperly before 

this Court. Under Montana law, a party cannot appeal a decision by a standing master 

directly to this Court. Scrantom v. Masters, 2018 MT 109, ¶ 9, 391 Mont. 251, 417 P.3d 

339 (citing Beals v. Beals, 2013 MT 120, ¶ 13, 370 Mont. 88, 300 P.3d 1158). Ashley 

explains that she sought a temporary order of protection against Samuel in December 2023 

and that the matter was referred to a standing master, pursuant to § 3-5-124(1), MCA. She 

adds that upon granting the temporary order, the standing master set a hearing on December 

29, 2023, where both parties appeared. Ashley points out that after the standing master 

issued a Permanent Order of Protection along with Findings of Facts and Conclusions of 

Law on January 4, 2024, Samuel did not file any objections to the Order, as required by 

08/27/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0068
§ 3-5-126(2), MCA, to place the matter before the District Court for review. Ashley 

reiterates that the specific objection requirement is statutorily required to ensure due 

process protections to both parties. In re Marriage of McMichael, 2006 MT 237, ¶ 15, 333 

Mont. 517, 143 P.3d 439; Scrantom, ¶ 12. Ashley requests dismissal because Samuel 

bypassed the written objection requirement by filing an appeal directly with this Court, 

thereby waiving any objection. 

Upon review, we conclude that Ashley's motion is dispositive of this appeal because 

Samuel did not comply with the statutory procedures, as listed in § 3-5-126(2), MCA. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. Ashley's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and this appeal is DISMISSED 

without prejudice; and 

2. the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this matter as of this Order's date. 

The Clerk also is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and 

to Samuel Vernon Tintinwersonally. 

DATED this Z:9- day of August, 2024. 

FILED 

AUG 2 7 2024 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana 

2 

Chief Justice 

Justices
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2024 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Pentanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Pentanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2 PENTANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,2 Pentanediol (CAS No. 

5343–02–0) (provided for in 

subheading 2905.39.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2024 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismiss ed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 1 , 2019.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00369

- CV

IN RE ORION MARINE CONSTRUCTION, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- 08160



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
May 3, 2019, relator Orion Marine Construction, Inc. filed a petition for writ
of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Dedra Davis, presiding judge of the 270th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside her April 24, 2019 order denying relator’s motion to compel discovery responses.2 R eal party in interest has pro vid ed the information relator seeks. The refore, the request for relief is now moot. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for
writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.