alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
S. Con. Res. 154 Agreed to October 30, 2000

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Concurrent Resolution

Whereas in 1982, after a period of 28 years, the Congress of the

United States resumed the United States commemorative coin

programs;

Whereas since 1982, 37 of the Nation’s worthy institutions,

organizations, foundations, and programs have been commemorated under the coin programs;

Whereas since 1982, the Nation’s coin collectors have purchased

nearly 49,000,000 commemorative coins that have yielded nearly

$1,800,000,000 in revenue and more than $407,000,000 in surcharges benefitting a variety of deserving causes;

Whereas the United States Capitol has benefitted from the

commemorative coin surcharges that have supported such

commendable projects as the restoration of the Statue of Freedom

atop the Capitol dome, the furtherance of the development of

the United States Capitol Visitor Center, and the planned

National Garden at the United States Botanic Gardens on the

Capitol grounds;

Whereas surcharges from the year 2000 coin program commemorating the Library of Congress bicentennial benefit the Library

of Congress bicentennial programs, educational outreach activities

(including schools and libraries), and other activities of the

Library of Congress; and

Whereas the United States Capitol Visitor Center commemorative

coin program will commence in January 2001, with the surcharges

designated to further benefit the Capitol Visitor Center: Now,

therefore, be it
S. Con. Res. 154—2

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That the Congress of the United States acknowledges and

salutes the ongoing generosity, loyalty, and significant role that

coin collectors have played in supporting our Nation’s meritorious

charitable organizations, foundations, institutions, and programs,

including the United States Capitol, the Library of Congress, and

the United States Botanic Gardens.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.
50447.

#### HOBBS v. THE STATE.

Bell, Chief Judge.

Defendant was indicted for two counts of murder. He was acquitted of one, the alleged murder of his wife, but convicted of voluntary manslaughter as to the other count. *Held:*

1. Testimony was admitted over objection that prior to the date of the alleged murder of his wife defendant had struck her. In addition other testimony was admitted without objection showing that the defendant had frequently during his marriage quarreled and cursed his wife. Evidence of a long course of ill-treatment and cruelty by defendant toward his wife is admissible as it bears on the question of motive of the defendant. *Roberts v. State,*123 Ga. 146 (5) (51 SE 374); *Williams v. State,*208 Ga. 704 (1) (69 SE2d 199). As it was admissible at the time of trial with respect to the alleged murder of the wife, of which defendant was acquitted, it cannot be held to be error as placing the defendant’s character in issue with reference to the other alleged homicide which resulted in a conviction.

2. At trial a deputy sheriff who was called to the scene testified on direct examination that when he arrived at defendant’s home the defendant appeared intoxicated, predicated on his observations of slurred speech, nervousness, bloodshot eyes, and red face. On cross examination the court refused to allow the question of whether the witness had previously had occasion to talk to anyone, "that had something bad happen when they *851were emotionally shaken.”

Submitted April 7, 1975

Decided May 15, 1975.

*Hoyt L. Bradford,*for appellant.

*Richard Bell, District Attorney, Edward H. Kellogg, Jr., Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

The right to a thorough and sifting cross examination belongs to every party as to witnesses called against him. Code § 38-1705. The scope of cross examination is not unlimited and rests largely within the discretion of the trial judge and it will not be controlled unless abused. *Clifton v. State,*187 Ga. 502 (2 SE2d 102). Further, prejudice or harm must be shown by the exclusion of the question asked on cross examination and it is not shown where counsel obtained substantially an answer to the question during later examination. *Geiger v. State,*129 Ga. App. 488 (199 SE2d 861). With reference to the excluded question counsel stated that he was attempting to determine whether incoherent speech from the witness’s experience could also be caused by a shocking event. Accepting counsel’s explanation of his motive in asking the question, the error, if any, in excluding the question could not have been harmful as the witness on further cross examination testified that he did not know whether shock may cause impaired speech.

3. There was evidence showing every element of voluntary manslaughter. Code Ann. 26-1102. Therefore, it was not error to charge the jury on voluntary manslaughter and the conviction of that crime was authorized.

4. The other enumerations of error have no merit.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.*
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Radiant Systems Central Europe, Inc.

Radiant Systems International, Inc. 

Estorelink.Com, Inc. 

RetailEnterprise, LLC 

Radiant Enterprise Software LLC 

Radiant Systems Asia-Pacific Pty Ltd. 

Radiant Systems Retail Solutions Pte Ltd. 

Radiant Systems s.r.o. 

Radiant Systems Retail Solutions, S.L. 

Radiant Systems UK Limited 

Radiant Hospitality Systems, Ltd. 

RADS Holding Corp. 

MenuLink Computer Solutions, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 12851-002 and 14082-000]


FFP Project 7, LLC and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC; 
Notice Announcing Preliminary Permit Drawing

    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications 
deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,\1\ for proposed 
projects to be located on the Mississippi River, near the town of New 
Orleans, in Jefferson and Orleans Parishes, Louisiana. The applications 
were filed by FFP Project 7, LLC for Project No. 12851-002, and 
Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14082-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any 
document received after regular business hours is considered filed 
at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) 
(2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the 
Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine 
the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The 
Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided 
in section 4.37 of its regulations.\2\ The priority established by this 
drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with 
identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed 
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR 4.37 (2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the 
Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 
20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing 
the results of the drawing.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-696 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2252 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Clothianidin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Clothianidin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLOTHIANIDIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.84 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2383 

To suspend temporarily the duty on reusable surgical wrappers of textile 

materials. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on reusable surgical 

wrappers of textile materials. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REUSABLE SURGICAL WRAPPERS OF TEXTILE 

4 MATERIALS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Reusable surgical wrappers of 

textile materials (provided for 

in subheading 6307.90.98) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2383 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Brooklyn Cheesecake
& Desserts Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that





(i)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(ii)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
April 14, 2009


/s/ Anthony
      J.  MeranteAnthony
      J. MerantePresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATIONS OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing by Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Quarterly Report”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, John S. Kovach, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(i) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 6, 2011
By:
/s/ JOHN S. KOVACHJohn S. KovachChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
Action of the Meeting of Board of Directors
             of VarTech Systems Inc. Held on November 1, 1999

Pursuant to La. R.S. 12:81C(9), and in lieu of a meeting of Board of Directors
for such purposes, the undersigned, being all of the Directors of this
corporation, do hereby take and authorize by unanimous written consent the
following action as hereinafter set forth:


AUTHORIZATION OF STOCK OPTIONS:

RESOLVED, that C. Wayne Prater, President of this corporation, be authorized to
extend stock purchase options for the shares of this corporation to employees
or affiliates of this corporation in recognition of work well done, or as an
inducement to future good work, at his sole discretion, including to himself,
on such terms and conditions as he deems appropriate, so long as no one employee
shall receive options for in excess of 200,000 shares in any given year without
further board approval.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this action has been signed by each director of the
corporation on the date indicated below, and this action shall be filed with
or otherwise entered on the minutes or other appropriate records of this
corporation.


Date:  November 1, 2000                /s/ C. Wayne Prater
                                      C. Wayne Prater, Director

Date:  November 1, 2000                /s/ Brent Hedges
                                      Brent Hedges, Director

Date:  November 1, 2000                /s/ J. Keith Henderson
                                      J. Keith Henderson, Director

Date:  November 1, 2000                /s/ Daniel S. Gould
                                      Daniel S. Gould, Director

Date:  November 1, 2000                /s/ Michele L. Prater
                                      Michele l. Prater, Director

<PAGE>
Order entered April 27, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00100-CR

CHRISTOPHER ROMMELL MCKINNEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F19-75306-M

ORDER

After the Court granted several extensions of time, appellant’s brief was due 

on March 31, 2021. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we have had no 

other communication regarding this appeal.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make 

appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant 

desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant has abandoned the appeal, or 
whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). 

If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court 

shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 

708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, 

the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure 

effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which 

shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within 

TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest 

White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; to Valencia Bush; and to the 

Dallas County District Attorney’s Office, Appellate Division.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above 

order. The appeal shall be reinstated twenty days from the date of this order or 

when the Court finds it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2








Certification by the Chief Financial Officer


of


Boardwalk GP, LLC


pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Boardwalk GP, LLC, hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, (the "Report") of Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, LP, (the "Partnership")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





July 31, 2009


/s/ Jamie L. Buskill


Jamie L. Buskill


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 143 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 143

 To make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3676.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

 Mr. Murkowski (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) submitted the following 
       concurrent resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
 To make technical corrections in the enrollment of the bill H.R. 3676.

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That in the enrollment of the bill (H.R. 3676) to establish the Santa 
Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument in the State of 
California, the Clerk of the House of Representatives shall make the 
following corrections:
            (1) In the second sentence of section 2(d)(1), strike ``and 
        the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry''.
            (2) In the second sentence of section 4(a)(3), strike 
        ``Nothing in this section'' and insert ``Nothing in this Act''.
            (3) In section 4(c)(1), strike ``any person, including''.
            (4) In section 5, add at the end the following:
    ``(j) Wilderness Protection.--Nothing in this Act alters the 
management of any areas designated as Wilderness which are within the 
boundaries of the National Monument. All such areas shall remain 
subject to the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.), the laws 
designating such areas as Wilderness, and other applicable laws. If any 
part of this Act conflicts with any provision of those laws with 
respect to the management of the Wilderness areas, such provisions 
shall control.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior is renewing the charter for the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group (CAG). The purpose of the CAG is to provide recommendations to the Secretary of the Interior and the State of Washington on the structure and implementation of the Yakima River Basin Water Conservation Program.

The basin conservation program is structured to provide economic incentives with cooperative Federal, State, and local funding to stimulate the identification and implementation of structural and nonstructural cost-effective water conservation measures in the Yakima River basin. Improvements in the efficiency of water delivery and use will result in improved streamflows for fish and wildlife and improve the reliability of water supplies for irrigation.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Timothy McCoy, Manager, Yakima River Basin Water Enhancement Project, telephone 509-575-5848, extension 209.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended). The certification of renewal is published below.

## Certification

I hereby certify that Charter renewal of the Yakima River Basin Conservation Advisory Group is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior.

Ken Salazar,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2012-6768 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P