alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 02/0708/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 03/07 ..... •••••·••**·••.••········~~~~i~~~r~~f.6l~:&a;A~i~o~I~~-·•·•·•** ..· ...••...**~o~~EJ\s;Jri,s:** ·· ·· · i&4s6 !,* s,lJIJiyan• . • · .,,'· l .**·········i~l)(}~~~~··bl~···~~j.••~YWiR~i··~·i'4~••·4~i~** .••**!lifq~··~·.··~iO~.ijo4~-~~··~,~~ii,** •.**·§iivil~~~.t!w:t ~·.~M.r~io** **iJ:;S¢Si:a¢~~~·~~#~ l!l..~~~t9f~~~;~o:.,:p~**  ·•**:~iliyiJ~,~~t~)~s~~~~~~.~~~llli~.~~~~#·d~m~~fo~1i:"~rii,:;•·;••·•·•** .··**~k§\vg~; Adffit~.** 
: : '**~,,**08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 04/07 ....... ·······• .: **~~s~~~=··~~~~;.•·····.•···•····•** " ' · ....... sl•.····· **~~t:4** #isditi$: %s **·{ldi~. ~~e~**  fot **~ :~ob,lJ?~r**  **i!lS~tipn' ~~·**  **~$5o .1~.~·.······**  ···•••·• .•••••.•• **····,·!\N~~~~;. ~~:.~~lek\;~ii**  **i~li~··~t** the **~¢f~ft·~·~~~.** used **~l~ly···** .. ·. ·.. 'ftir 'rentah:i tatitirts: .ifui.Cthe •mallifot sti(ih a 'e&Jiclusion is sim I · **~4SO·** .•• **·····~i~!~~~~~~~~j.t ~~~~·tPt**  **~~~rf,,.·** .. **E~c~pt** '!Is' **~~p#~•;~o~; ~e**  ••..•. .. ''" '"' .::.;·,. ,.,,,., :, :.:.::·::·:":::::: :· ·.::· .. :. ':: ' ,•: ',: .: ·:::. ,: ·, . . " .. ' •: ..... ·· ·:,· .. : . . **~i~~~~~~~:~~~~~** ,. . . • •. ::1.,'?$:\IA
**~l;Whi h(\ljt~/''**  •• ··.·.· · · J ' .•.·.• **~.i.~.·~·~·~·:·:~~~~.=.~~,t...~i~~r~r~·** •• · : .... :_: '<;:<;_); .. **:,~,:.i,** :·:,::,;,·, : :·. ·.? '!: **~;-~:,; :,:!.'::_[:,:::~:**  ·,:;.,· :·. ·.·· ,: ')::! ;!::;·:.: . . .... ··:.:::--:.':,::;:: ;,,:·.>· .. :::;; .,:,:,.:,,,,·;,;;,::·'' ·,:: .· .... :.:".:. ·::> .. ".:'08/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 05/07 '.: ... ·:;' ":' ... ·.·" ·., ,•· :·:' ' :·:·::.·•' .. ,, .•. (q)08/08/2015 02:50PH 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 05/0708/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE ,'::!**!i;li'ii,:~~~~~i~,i',i!ii** •·•·• ···**~~~~~:~~*~~fi~~~[t~d~~f~~ij~~!.?~~~e.~~~·$!e§,0au.··•** .. •..•**··~~~~~~~~~tinrt.:••••** ........ .,..**~a::J~~34** ' ........... . .**····.·~Df r~LlN~:~.~** **~~~E~··~~$s.:.••· •:~~~~~-~**  '**'~'1fhiJ>~?~~i~ 2,Q~~t**  < . . .... · ' •• •.• . . . ·· ..**A4A;·H~~'£)99~t(llerl1;;8-G.C:4$0** · .... , llolii**~J:~~~~i,:!,''::i**

.;·
07/0708/08/2015 02:50PM 3352271224 To: Clear Day Aviation, Inc. dba Burlington Aviation 3510 Alamance Road **Burling~on,** NC 27215 Sharice Jefferson FAA From: Clear Day Aviation Inc. Re: Hearing Docket Clerk CC:

BURLINGTON AVIATION PAGE 01/07 Fax: Date: Pages:
BUS (336) 227-1:178 FAX (336) 221-1ns

202-267-1293 8/8/2015 7 (including cover) (X) Urgent (X) For Review ( ) P!eaaeComment ) P!eaaeReply ( ) Please Recycle • • • • Faxed at request of H. Bruce Brandon 3439 South Aviation Drive Burlington, NC 27215 Attorney for: Burlington Aviation

**~** • • • • • • . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended February 28, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act
        of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July
                  31, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Hugo
                  M. CancioHugo
                  M. CancioTitle:
                  Principal Executive
                  Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-10093

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHADWICK DARAY HEATH,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Chadwick Daray Heath has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Heath has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-10093

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project Nos. 12848-002 and 14081-000]

                    The Commission has received two preliminary permit applications deemed filed on February 1, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.,[1]                                          for proposed projects to be located on the Mississippi River, near the town of New Orleans, in Orleans Parish, Louisiana. The applications were filed by FFP Project 6, LLC for Project No. 12848-002, and Northland Power Mississippi River LLC for Project No. 14081-000.                

                    On January 17, 2012, at 9 a.m. (eastern time), the Secretary of the Commission, or her designee, will conduct a random drawing to determine the filing priority of the applicants identified in this notice. The Commission will select among competing permit applications as provided in section 4.37 of its regulations.[2]                                          The priority established by this drawing will be used to determine which applicant, among those with identical filing times, will be considered to have the first-filed application.                

The drawing is open to the public and will be held in room 2C, the Commission Meeting Room, located at 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426. A subsequent notice will be issued by the Secretary announcing the results of the drawing.

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Under the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, any document received after regular business hours is considered filed at 8:30 a.m. on the next regular business day. 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(2) (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.37 (2011).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-697 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>
                            Exhibit 23






                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries of
our report dated January 20, 1999, included in the 1998 Annual
Report to Shareholders of American Freightways Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of
American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries listed in
Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-63674) pertaining to the
American Freightways Corporation Stock Option Plan and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-76788) pertaining to the
American Freightways Corporation Stock Purchase Plan of our report
dated January 20, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements incorporated herein by reference, and our report
included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries.



/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Little Rock, Arkansas
March 10, 1999
#### George POLK, Appellant, v. Katrina POLK, n/k/a Katrina Jarema, Appellee.

No. 87-3328.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Sept. 21, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 14, 1988.

*1004George Polk, pro se.

Elizabeth G. Mansfield of Law Office of Gary A. Carnal, St. Petersburg, for appel-lee.

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant George Polk seeks review of the trial court’s property distribution between the parties in a final judgment for dissolution of marriage. We affirm.

The final hearing was not recorded. The decision of the trial court has the presumption of correctness, and the burden is on Mr. Polk to demonstrate trial court error. *Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,*377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979). He has not. Without a record of the trial court proceedings, this appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying disputed factual issues. The trial court should be affirmed because the record Mr. Polk brought forward is inadequate to demonstrate reversible error. *Id.*at 1152.

AFFIRMED.

FRANK, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,800
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,705
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,505)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0








</TABLE>
#### Madelon GREEN, Appellant, v. Karl W. GREEN, Appellee.

No. 86-3136.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 17, 1988.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1988.

Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and John R. Kelso, Miami, for appellant.

Magill & Lewis and R. Fred Lewis, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Following this court’s opinion reported in *Green v. Green,*484 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), the matter recurred in the trial court for the purpose of fixing permanent periodic alimony in accordance with said opinion and mandate. The trial judge awarded $400 a month as permanent periodic alimony for a period of thirty-four months. The wife having remarried between the date of the original opinion and the hearing to fix periodic alimony, he awarded it retroactive. Based on the conflicts in the evidence before him, we find no error and affirm. *Marcoux v. Marcoux,*464 So.2d 542 (Fla.1985); *Canakaris v.*
      *943
      *Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); *McDonald v. McDonald,*368 So.2d 1283 (Fla.1979); *Kozak v. Kozak,*507 So.2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance
      Resources Corp. for the quarter ended February 28, 2007, I certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance Resources Corp. for the quarter
              ended February 28, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended February 28, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of Nuance Resources
              Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                James D. BunneyName:
            James
                D. BunneyTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            April
                16, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6460]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7827]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Joan Mir[oacute]: the Ladder of Escape''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Joan Mir[oacute]: the Ladder of Escape,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National 
Gallery of Art, Washington, DC from on or about May 6, 2012, until on 
or about August 12, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 12, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-6460 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  RULES 13A-15(E) AND 15D-15(E) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Birmingham Bloomfield Bancshares,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    [Reserved];c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Richard J. Miller

Richard J. MillerChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:

/s/
FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Directors
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing General Partner
#### David FARNAM, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BO-408.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Dec. 9, 1987.

Michael Allen, Public Defender; and Terry P. Lewis, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

David Famam, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Norma J. Mungenast, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Before us is an appeal brought pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), wherein appellant has filed a pro se brief challenging his sentence on the basis of alleged improperly scored points for victim injury. We affirm appellant’s convictions for battery, resisting arrest with violence, and robbery, and we note that at the sentencing hearing, pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant received an effective sentence of ten years, which was within the guidelines range. However, the score-sheet, reflecting robbery as the primary offense at conviction, does not list as additional offenses at conviction the counts of battery and resisting arrest with violence. Those convictions would justify the scoring of fourteen points for victim injury. *See*Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 d.7. Consequently, we must remand the cause for correction of the scoresheet to reflect the oral pronouncement of sentence and the additional offenses at conviction. *Beverly v. State,*516 So.2d 30 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

We also reverse on the basis that costs of $225 were improperly imposed without affording appellant notice and an *330opportunity to object, and a hearing on indigency. *Bellinger v. State,*514 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
#### Crancy SCRIVENS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-629.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael L. O’Neill, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. *See Reynolds v. State,*516 So.2d 1094 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.