alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoff Turner,
Chief Executive Officer, and  I, Judith Wallace, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Geoff TurnerGeoff
      TurnerPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Judith WallaceJudith
      WallaceChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      September 20, 2010
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT



### ___________ No. 97-1189

___________ In re: Burma Jean Martin, * * Debtor, *

------------------------------- * * Burma Jean Martin, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Brian Sanford, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant, *

------------------------------- * * Richard Cox, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: June 16, 1997 Filed: June 19, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. The Honorable Mary D. Scott, Uni ted States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern 2 District of Arkansas. -2- PER CURIAM. Burma Jean Martin appeals from the district court's affirmance of th e 1 bankruptcy court's denial of her petition to convert

. After reviewing the 2 bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear error an d its l egal conclusions de novo, we conclude that th e judg ment was correct and that no further discussion i s warranted. See In re Montgomery , 37 F.3d 413, 414-1 5 (8th Cir. 1994) (standard of review). Accordingly, th e judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHT H CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>

MERCURY FINANCE COMPANY

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<CAPTION>

Year Ended December 31 (dollars in thousands)

                                     1997              1996             1995             1994            1993 

<S>                              <C>              <C>               <C>                <C>              <C>    

Net income/(loss)                 $(74,193)        ($28,968)        $74,129            $86,545          $64,927

Added fixed charges:
  Cost of Borrowing                 86,529           64,789          57,303             39,375           32,933
  One-third of rentals               1,524            1,464           1,370              1,056              873
                                ----------       ----------      ----------         ----------       ----------
  Total fixed charges:             $88,053          $66,253         $58,673            $40,431          $33,806
                                      ====             ====            ====               ====             ====

   Provisions/(credits) for
     income taxes:
   Federal                        (15,276)          (18,604)         38,895             46,797           34,634
   State                             (974)           (1,811)          7,084              7,648            5,306
                                ----------        ----------     ----------         ----------       ----------
   Total income taxes            $(16,250)         ($20,415)        $45,979            $54,445          $39,940
                                     =====             =====           ====               ====             ====

   Total "earnings"
     (net income/(loss),
     fixed charges and
     income taxes)                $(2,390)           $16,870       $178,781           $181,421         $138,673
                                     =====             =====          =====              =====             ====

Ratio of "earnings" to fixed
 charges (Note 1)                       -                 -            3.05               4.49             4.10
                                        ==                ==             ==                 ==               ==

Deficiency of fixed charges
  coverage (Note 1)                $90,443           $49,383            N/A                N/A              N/A
                                     =====             =====          =====              =====             ====

Note 1.

SEC Regulation S-K requires the disclosure of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges except where the ratio falls below 1, then
the deficiency shall be disclosed in dollar terms.

</TABLE>
Table 7.4. Weighted Average Cost of Fossil Fuels for the Electric Power Industry, 2003 through 2013

 Coal Petroleum Natural Gas 

Bituminous Subbituminous Lignite All Coal Ranks

Period

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

Average Cost

(Dollars per

MMBtu)

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

Average Cost

(Dollars per

MMBtu)

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

Average Cost

(Dollars per

MMBtu)

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

Average Cost

(Dollars per

MMBtu)

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

Average Cost

(Dollars per

MMBtu)

Receipts

(Trillion Btu)

2003 11,284 1.43 7,598 1.10 1,026 1.03 19,990 1.28 1,146 4.33 5,663 2004 11,260 1.55 7,817 1.12 1,012 1.06 20,189 1.36 1,155 4.29 5,891 2005 11,546 1.83 8,004 1.19 1,008 1.07 20,647 1.54 1,198 6.44 6,357 2006 11,789 2.03 8,842 1.31 982 1.15 21,735 1.69 610 6.23 6,856 2007 11,279 2.07 8,826 1.45 925 1.28 21,152 1.77 536 7.17 7,396 2008 11,119 2.50 9,087 1.62 896 1.41 21,280 2.07 575 10.87 8,089 2009 10,010 2.75 8,421 1.64 835 1.58 19,438 2.21 528 7.02 8,319 2010 9,652 2.81 8,545 1.73 925 1.62 19,290 2.27 445 9.54 8,867 2011 9,040 2.94 8,498 1.91 986 1.62 18,676 2.39 388 12.48 9,251 2012 7,502 2.89 7,722 1.97 931 1.80 16,266 2.38 237 12.48 9,747 2013 7,351 2.77 7,511 2.00 927 1.78 15,907 2.34 256 11.57 8,721 

* = Value is less than half of the smallest unit of measure. (e.g., for values with no decimals, the smallest unit is 1 then values under 0.5 are shown as *.)NM = Not meaningful due to large relative standard error or excessive percentage change.W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data.Notes:Coal includes anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous, lignite, and waste coal; coal synfuel and refined coal; and beginning in 2011, coal-derived synthesis gas. Prior to 2011 coal-derived synthesis gas was included in Other Gases.

Bituminous coal includes anthracite coal; and beginning in 2011, coal-derived synthesis gas. Prior to 2011 coal-derived synthesis gas was included in Other Gases.Petroleum includes Petroleum Liquids and Petroleum Coke.Petroleum Liquids includes distillate and residual fuel oils, jet fuel, kerosene, waste oil, and beginning in 2011, propane. Prior to 2011 propane was included in Other Gases.Petroleum Coke includes petroleum coke-derived synthesis gas. Prior to 2011, petroleum coke-derived synthesis gas was included in Other Gases.See the Technical Notes for fuel conversion factors.See Glossary for definitions.Values are final.See Technical Notes for a discussion of the sample design for the Form EIA-923 and predecessor forms.Totals may not equal sum of components because of independent rounding.Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), Form EIA-923, "Power Plant Operations Report" and predecessor form(s) including Form EIA-423, "Monthly Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Plants Report" and Federal Energy Regu

Report of Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Plants"

1 of 1
#### Florence Streater TAUSSIG, et al. v. GOLDKING PROPERTIES CO., et al.

No. 86-C-2334.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Taussig, Florence S.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 84-1020; Parish of Cameron, 38th Judicial District Court, No. 100-8979.

Prior report: La.App., 495 So.2d 1008.

Denied.

WATSON, J., would grant the writ.
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JAVIER ORTIZ,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 219 MAL 2016** 

**P etition for Allowance of Appeal from**  **the Order of the Superior Court**

ORDER

P ER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of**

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-16-00434- CV
Alejandro Sanchez d/b/ a Sanchez Construction, Appellan t
v. D. Bryand Consu lting, LL C, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 423 RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 423 -27 57, H ONO RAB LE CHRI STO P HER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant’s brief was due on August 10, 2016. On August 16, 2016, this Court notified appellant that his brief was overdue and that a failure to respond by August 26, 2016, would result in the dismiss al of this appea l for want of prosec ution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief
or a motion for extension of time. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(a) , 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Rose, Jus tices Goodwin a nd Bour land Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: September

2, 2016
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 160

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

considered and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns

3 at the close of business on Thursday, November 2, 2000,

4 or on Monday, November 6, 2000, on a motion offered

5 pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority

6 Leader or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned

7 until noon on Tuesday, November 14, 2000, or until such

8 time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Lead9 er or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or

10 until noon on the second day after Members are notified
2

SCON 160 ATS

1 to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent res2 olution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House

3 adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, November 2,

4 2000, Friday, November 3, 2000, Saturday, November 4,

5 2000, Sunday, November 5, 2000, Monday, November 6,

6 2000, Tuesday, November 7, 2000, Wednesday, November

7 8, 2000, or Thursday, November 9, 2000, on a motion

8 offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Ma9 jority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned until 2:00

10 p.m. on Monday, November 13, 2000, or until noon on

11 the second day after Members are notified to reassemble

12 pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, which13 ever occurs first.

14 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

15 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

16 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

17 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen18 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

19 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
#### Kenneth M. BLUE, et al. v. COASTAL CLUB, INC. & Sheldon S. Blue.

No. 88-C-0532.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 25, 1988.

In re Blue, Sheldon S.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA86-1224; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 85-5771.

Prior report: La.App., 524 So.2d 883.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2316 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2316

  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on alpha Oxy Naphthoic 
                                 Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on alpha Oxy Naphthoic 
                                 Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALPHA OXY NAPHTHOIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to alpha Oxy Naphthoic Acid) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective column period and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007009EN.01000401.xml

| 13.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4329 — Total/Cepsa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 9/02)

On 13 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4329. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4329. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### W. E. S. DYER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 7250.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Jan. 29, 1940.

Conlen, LaBrum & Beechwood and J. Harry LaBrum, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

J. Cullen Ganey, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, CLARK, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

And now, upon motion of J. Harry LaBrum, Esq., counsel for appellant, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal of appellant be and hereby is dismissed. Costs to be paid by appellant.
EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Bonso Electronics International, Inc., a British
Virgin Islands international business company (the "Corporation"), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

        The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Form 20-F") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and
information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: September __, 2007                  /s/  Anthony So
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Anthony So
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: September __, 2007                  /s/  Henry Ma
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Henry Ma
                                           Director of Finance
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing Tax Credits, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: June 27, 2011
EXHIBIT
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2006, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January
                19, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
                M. CancioHugo
                M. CancioTitle:
                Principal Executive Officer
Order entered December 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00571-CR

WINDELL STOKES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-50472-422-F

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s December 12, 2018 second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. We GRANT the State’s motion in part and ORDER the State’s brief filed no 

later than January 28, 2019. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
S. Con. Res. 23 Agreed to March 25, 1999

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

Concurrent Resolution

Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), That when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the close

of business on Thursday, March 25, 1999, Friday, March 26, 1999,

Saturday, March 27, 1999, or Sunday, March 28, 1999, on a motion

offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader

or his designee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Monday, April 12, 1999, or until such time on that day as may be

specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion

to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House

adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, March 25, 1999, or

Friday, March 26, 1999, on a motion offered pursuant to this

concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it

stand adjourned until 12:30 p.m. on Monday, April 12, 1999, for

morning-hour debate, or until noon on the second day after Members

are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent

resolution, whichever occurs first.

SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker

of the House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority

Leader of the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall

notify the Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to
S. Con. Res. 23—2

reassemble whenever, in their opinion, the public interest shall

warrant it.

Attest:

Secretary of the Senate.

Attest:

Clerk of the House of Representatives.