alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-663]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated August 9, 2011, and published in the Federal 
Register on August 18, 2011, 76 FR 51401, Austin Pharma LLC., 811 
Paloma Drive, Suite C, Round Rock, Texas 78665-2402, made application 
by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be 
registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of 
controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marihuana (7360)........................................               I
Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370)............................               I
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical 
ingredients (APIs) for distribution to its customers.
    In reference to drug code 7360 (Marihuana), the company plans to 
bulk manufacture cannabidiol as a synthetic intermediate. This 
controlled substance will be further synthesized to bulk manufacture a 
synthetic THC (7370). No other activity for this drug code is 
authorized for this registration.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Austin Pharma LLC. to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Austin Pharma LLC. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance 
with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed.

    Dated: January 6, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-663 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
Order filed December 5, 2019

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00835

- CV

____________ NII

- OTABIL NELSON , Appellant

V. DOREEN E NELSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 2006

- 31097



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed October 22, 2019. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs ha s been filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before December 20, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Ifappellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 0F 1934, AS AMENDED,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Don Peay certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of World Trophy Outfitters, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

|   | /s/ Don Peay |
|--------|--------------|

Don Peay, President and Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

| August 14, 2007 |
|-----------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry & David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 26,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 4, 2010



By:

/S/ WILLIAM H. WILLIAMSWilliam H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/ EDWARD F. DUNLAPEdward F. DunlapChief Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. --.< i .,-. 

IN THE MATTER OF ,,-,,-M ,;l 

l ---') 

MACH ONE AIR CHARTERS, INC. 

FDMS NO.: FAA-2015-0643 

ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD C. GOODWIN, ALJ. 

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FOR 

ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DISCOVERY. 

Respondent has no objection to Complainant's motion for addition time to conduct 

discovery provided the Order is mutual. 

DATED: January 11,2016 

STEVEN L. GRAFF, INC. 

A Professional Law Cor oration 

by·A;~~~~~~~~~ STEV RAFF E 

Attorney at !aw 

43399 Calle De Velardo 

Temecula, CA 92592 

(951) 303-6400 tel 

(800) 839-7777 toll free 

aviationcounse/@aol.com 

Attorney for Respondent 

Pa e 1 

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DISCOVERY 

'-1. 

i'J 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this day, placed in the United States mail, postage 

prepaid, a copy of the RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANT'S 

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DISCOVERY addressed to: 

GLENN H. BROWN, ESQ. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

222 W. 7TH Avenue #14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7 586 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, ALJ 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

I hereby further certify that I have this day, placed in the United States mail, 

postage prepaid, the original and copy of the RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DISCOVERY 

addressed to: 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

The Hearing Docket, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building- Room 2W1 000 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the state of California that 

the foregoing is true and correct and that this document is executed on January 

11 2016 atieme a,G~fornia. 2 \. --.,,, 

Pa e 2 

RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO COMPLAINANT'S REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL TIME FOR DISCOVERY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,810
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,863
<PP&E>                                           1,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,229
<BONDS>                                          4,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,808
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,298
<SALES>                                         11,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,056
<CGS>                                            9,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   258
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,707)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,707)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,707)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 USC § 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Voyant International Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Dana Waldman, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the date and for the periods indicated.





|                    |  |                                                                   
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 19, 2009 |  |                                                                   
|                    |  | /s/ Dana Waldman                                                  
|                    |  | Dana Waldman
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8030

CHARLES R. MORRIS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:13-cv-00629-LO-TCB)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles R. Morris, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles R. Morris seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 

473, 484-85 (2000). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Morris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
#### Bertram L. Marks, as Ancillary Executor of John B. Morgan, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*L. Laflin Kellogg, as Executor of George H. Morgan, Deceased, Appellant.

Reported below, 170 App. Div. 464.

(Argued February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judi*661cial department, entered December 16, 1915, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover a legacy.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was frivolous and presented no question of law for review.

*Louis Lowenstein*for motion.

*William K. Hartpence*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, George Moore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Barrington Sciences
Corporation, a Nevada corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: May 1, 2007

/S/ George Moore
--------------------------------
George Moore, President & CEO
NUMBERS 13-19-00569-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

MATEO FABIAN GOMEZ GARZA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

The reporter’s records submitted to this court appear incomplete. The honorable 

court reporter Jacqueline Inks has been granted several requests for extension. 

Furthermore, on August 17, 2020 notice was sent to the trial court’s official reporter, Mark 

Kvapil and the honorable Jacqueline Inks notifying each of the missing volumes. To date, 

volumes 1, 2, 12, 14, and 22 have not been received by the clerk of this court. 
2

This sequence of events requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further 

delay and to preserve the parties' rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(1). Accordingly, this 

appeal is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

In accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(f)(4), the trial court is 

directed to conduct a hearing to determine if: (1) the appellant has timely requested a 

reporter's record; (2) without the appellant's fault, a significant exhibit or a significant 

portion of the court reporter's notes and records has been lost or destroyed or - if the 

proceedings were electronically recorded - a significant portion of the recording has been 

lost or destroyed or is inaudible; (3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the 

reporter's record, or the lost and destroyed exhibit, is necessary to the appeal's resolution; 

and (4) the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter's record cannot be replaced 

by agreement of the parties, or the lost or destroyed exhibit cannot be replaced either by 

agreement of the parties or with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately 

duplicate with reasonable certainty the original exhibit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f).

The trial court is directed to forward the record of the proceedings, including any 

orders and findings, to this Court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, or to 

notify this Court within such period indicating a date by which the trial court can comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed this the

29th day of October, 2020.
# L_2011205EN.01003801.xml

| 10.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 205/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 205/38

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1717/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an Instrument for Stability

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 327 of 24 November 2006
  )

On page 4, Article 4, introductory wording:

for:

‘The Community shall provide technical and financial assistance in pursuit of the specific aims set out in Article 2(b) in the following areas:’,

read:

‘The Community shall provide technical and financial assistance in pursuit of the specific aims set out in point (b) of Article 1(2) in the following areas:’.

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2181 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 

with diethenylbenzene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic 

acid, polymer with diethenylbenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH 

4 DIETHENYLBENZENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.95 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 2-Propenoic acid, polymer with diethenylbenzene) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2181 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Rudolph R. SCHOEMANN, III v. TURNWOOD DEVELOPMENT CORP., et al. Rudolph R. SCHOEMANN, III v. Charles B. MORSE, et al.

No. 87-C-1534.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Schoemann, Rudolph R. Ill; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. CA86 0220, CA86 0221; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 64313.

Prior report: La.App., 507 So.2d 21.

Denied.