alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |

| Dated:       May 15, 2009                                                |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                          |   |   |   |
| /s/       Michael Hlavsa                                                 |   |   |   |
| Michael      HlavsaChief      Financial Officer & Chief AccountingOfficer |
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                       Subsidiaries of DRAXIS Health Inc.

<Table>
<Caption>

                                                                                             OTHER NAMES UNDER WHICH
SUBSIDIARY                               JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION                       SUBSIDIARY IS DOING
----------                               -----------------------------                       BUSINESS
                                                                                             -----------------------
<S>                                      <C>                                                 <C>

DRAXIMAGE Inc.                           Canada (CBCA)

DRAXIS Pharma Inc.                       Canada (CBCA)                                       DPI

Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc.             State of Louisiana                                  DAHI

DAHI LLC                                 State of Delaware

DAHI Nevada Inc.                         State of Nevada

DRAXIS U.S. Inc.                         State of Delaware

DAHI Animal Health (New Zealand)         New Zealand (Companies Act 1993 as a limited
  Pty Limited                            liability company)

DAHI Animal Health (UK) Limited          England and Wales (Companies Act 1985 as a
                                         private limited company)

DRAXIMAGE LLC                            State of Delaware
</Table>
The Honorable Anthony F oxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Foxx: 

July 23, 2014 

This letter is in in response to DOT Order 2014-6-6 terminating EAS subsidy payments at 

the Venango Regional Airport and· in support of our petition requesting a waiver of the 1 0 

enplanement statute, Docket-OST-1997-2523. I understand that such waivers can be granted 

when the shortage of enplanements is temporary. There is strong agreement and broad support 

for a new airline I destination plan that seeks to permanently increase enplanements to 

acceptable, historical levels. Based on the belief that this plan will succeed, I strongly encourage 

your sincere consideration to granting the requested waiver. 

The new plan introduces a new airline and returns Pittsburgh as the designated 

destination. This arrangement will help restore enplanement numbers to the historical levels 

enjoyed when daily flights were offered between the Venango Regional Airport and the 

Pittsburgh International airport. As a regional partner the City of Pittsburgh has a relationship 

with all of western Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh based businesses, hospitals and educational 

institutions have expanded into our area making the Pittsburgh International Airport the ideal 

destination for commuter service from the Franklin/Oil City - Venango Regional Airport service 

area. Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Douglas A. Baker, Mayor 

City of Franklin, Pa.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

July 2, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00207

- CV

Peter BARTON

, Appell ant

v.

Ana Lisa GARZA

, Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas Trial Court No. DC

- 12

- 308 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on July 18, 2014

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 234 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 21
111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 234

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``Colonel 
              John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2009

Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Burris) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                           February 11, 2009

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``Colonel 
              John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COLONEL JOHN H. WILSON, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Colonel John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.
                                                        Calendar No. 21

111th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 234

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 2105 East Cook Street in Springfield, Illinois, as the ``Colonel 
              John H. Wilson, Jr. Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 11, 2009

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP INC.


FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Parsh Patel, am the Chief Executive Officer of Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






July 31, 2014
By:
/s/ Parsh PatelParsh PatelPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JLA/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DENIS ALEXANDER AMAYAFLORES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-72724

Agency No. A098-592-918

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Denis Alexander Amaya-Flores, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JLA/Research 2 08-72724

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except

to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing

statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004).

We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review.

We reject Amaya-Flores’s claim that he is eligible for asylum and

withholding of removal based on his membership in a particular social group,

namely, young El Salvadoran males who refuse to join gangs. See Santos-Lemus v.

Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (rejecting as a particular social

group “young men in El Salvador resisting gang violence”) (internal quotation

omitted); Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 860-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (rejecting

as a particular social group “young Honduran men who have been recruited by [a

gang], but who refuse to join”). 

Accordingly, because Amaya-Flores failed to demonstrate that he was

persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as to his asylum
JLA/Research 3 08-72724

and withholding of removal claims. See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 856 (9th

Cir. 2009). 

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Amaya-Flores

failed to demonstrate a clear probability he will be tortured by the government or

with the government’s acquiescence if returned to El Salvador. See Wakkary v.

Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 23, 2011 |   | /s/ Khuat Leok Choong             |   |
|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                |   | Khuat Leok (Lionel) Choong,       |   |
|                |   | CFO (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                |   |                              |   |

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131566 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131566 COA: 268669 Kalkaska CC: 03-002401-FC ERIC MICHAEL MUSSER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 1, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2170 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2170

            To suspend temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on ferroniobium.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FERRONIOBIUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Ferroniobium        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (provided for in                                                   31/2011.......
                          subheading
                          7202.93.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

            Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Warren B. Kanders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 14, 2006                          By: /s/ Warren B. Kanders
                                                  ---------------------
                                                  Name:  Warren B. Kanders
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
```
#### Willie J. WALKER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-2615.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 24, 1987.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Julie S. Thornton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant’s conviction is affirmed. *State v. Murray,*443 So.2d 955 (Fla.1984); *Blair v. State,*406 So.2d 1103 (Fla.1981); *Zamot v. State,*375 So.2d 881 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); *Oliva v. State,*346 So.2d 1066 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). The defendant’s sentence is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for the entry of a written statement pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(ll) delineating the trial court’s reasons for deviating from the guidelines. *See Echevarria v. State,*492 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (unsigned notations on a sentencing guidelines score-sheet do not serve as a written order); *Bauza v. State,*491 So.2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) (same).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 961 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 961

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

                Referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve 
                   shared appreciation arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHARED APPRECIATION ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 353(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) 
and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Terms.--A shared appreciation agreement entered into 
        by a borrower under this subsection shall--
                    ``(A) have a term not to exceed 10 years;
                    ``(B) provide for recapture based on the difference 
                between--
                            ``(i) the appraised value of the real 
                        security property at the time of restructuring; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) that value at the time of recapture, 
                        except that that value shall not include the 
                        value of any capital improvements made to the 
                        real security property by the borrower after 
                        the time of restructuring; and
                    ``(C) allow the borrower to obtain a loan, in 
                addition to any other outstanding loans under this 
                title, to pay any amounts due on a shared appreciation 
                agreement, at a rate of interest that is not greater 
                than the rate of interest on outstanding marketable 
                obligations of the United States of a maturity 
                comparable to that of the loan.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to a shared appreciation arrangement entered into under section 353(e) 
of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) 
that matures on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
#### STATE of Louisiana, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Walter LABORDE, Defendant-Relator.

No. K 89-437.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

April 24, 1989.

Marion A. French, Alexandria, for defendant-relator. '

Henry Lemoine, Jr., City Prosecutor, Pineville, for plaintiff-respondent.

Before FORET, KNOLL and KING, JJ.

Relator was convicted of a misdemeanor offense on April 8, 1987 and was sentenced on April 22, 1987. On May 4, 1987, relator obtained from the trial court an order for appeal of his conviction and sentence which was made returnable on June 30, 1987. After the record was forwarded to this Court for lodging of the appeal, this Court returned the record to the trial court with instructions to the trial court and counsel for relator to seek judicial review in this Court by application for writ of review. See, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 912.1(C)(1). In the interim, relator satisfied his sentence by paying his fine and satisfactorily completing the terms of his probation. Relator did not seek a writ of review of his conviction and sentence until February 29, 1989 when the trial court denied relator’s application for a writ of review. This writ application was then filed to review the propriety of the trial court’s denial of relator’s application for a writ of review of his conviction and sentence. Satisfaction of sentence by relator renders this case moot so as to preclude *1052review of, or attack on, relator’s conviction and sentence. Cf. *State v. Morris,*328 So.2d 65 (La.1976).
#### A.C.S., a child, Appellant,v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-938.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James R. Wulchak, Chief, Appellate Division, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

The juvenile defendant appeals an adjudication of delinquency on charges of aggravated battery, battery and petit theft. We reverse.

The trial court erred in admitting into evidence, for substantive purposes, the discovery deposition of the alleged victim. Depositions taken for purposes of discovery may not be used as substantive evidence in a criminal trial. *State v. James,*402 So.2d 1169 (Fla.1981). The state concedes the Rules of Juvenile Procedure, like the Rules of Criminal Procedure, provide that a deposition taken for discovery purposes may be used only “for the purpose of impeaching the testimony of the deponent as a witness.” Fla.R.Juv.P. 8.070(d)(3). *Cf*Rule 8.070(e).

Because the trial court expressly relied on the deposition in determining delinquency, we cannot agree with the state’s contention that the error in admitting the deposition was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Because the evidence is otherwise insufficient to support the adjudication, we reverse with directions to discharge the defendant.

REVERSED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and COBB, J., concur.