alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Anton MAEDER, Appellant, v. Harry S. HONIG, Appellee.

No. 4-86-1227.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 25, 1987.

Robert C. Rogers, Jr., of Lawrence J. Bohannon, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Mary Anne Philips of Green & Murphy, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

*62PER CURIAM.

Reversed. Upon review of the record we believe that there is evidence that appellant sustained a permanent injury in the automobile accident allegedly caused by appel-lee and that the trial court erred in finding to the contrary and dismissing appellant’s claim. *Cf. Burkett v. Parker,*410 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 to theQuarterly Report of Chisen Electric Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: February 28, 2011
By:
/s/ Xu KechengName:
Xu KechengTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chisen Electric Corporation will be retained by Chisen Electric Corporation and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Corrected Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        A Corrected Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an environmental impact Statement was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         (77 FR 14727) on March 13, 2012 concerning a request for scoping comments. The document contained incorrect dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Tim Piazza, Team Leader, Federal Building, Ketchikan, AK 99901, (907) 228-6318.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 13, 2012 (77 FR 14727), on page 14727, in the third column, correct the                         **DATES**                         caption to read:                    

**DATES:**                             Comments received during the initial scoping period in 2010-2011 will be considered in the preparation of this EIS. New or additional comments must be received April 27, 2012. The draft environmental impact statement is expected in December 2012, and the final environmental impact statement is expected in June 2013.                        

Dated: March 13, 2012.

Forrest Cole,

Forest Supervisor, Tongass National Forest.

[FR Doc. 2012-6780 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FORM 10-K OF G-I HOLDINGS INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                   124,623
<SECURITIES>                                             90,250
<RECEIVABLES>                                            10,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                             2,183
<INVENTORY>                                              75,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         618,061
<PP&E>                                                   223,051
<DEPRECIATION>                                           48,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           1,929,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    191,654
<BONDS>                                                  861,071
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               445,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             1,929,156
<SALES>                                                  851,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         851,967
<CGS>                                                    623,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            623,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       127,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (37,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             (11,706)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (25,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           110,746
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          (30,950)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             54,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                          Financial Data Schedule
                                                        EXHIBIT 27.1

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 1997
Form 10-K of Armor Holdings, Inc., and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
Armor Holdings
Currency U.S. Dollars
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0000845752
<NAME>    Armor Holdings

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                      19,300,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,597,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   845,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,731,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,599,000
<PP&E>                                      12,558,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,517,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,487,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,665,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       160,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  64,438,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,487,000
<SALES>                                     78,314,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            78,314,000
<CGS>                                       57,438,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,438,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,587,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               418,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             195,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,676,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,376,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,157,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,157,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International,
Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis W. Lakomy, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2005 |  | /s/ Dennis W. Lakomy                                
|                     |  | Dennis W. Lakomy                                    
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided by CFC International, Inc., and will be retained by CFC International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



75
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14350-14351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5795]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XB072


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of meetings of the North Pacific Fishery Management 
Council Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Implementation Team.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) IFQ 
Implementation Team will meet March 26, 2012 in Anchorage, AK.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 26, 2012, from 6 p.m. to 9 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Anchorage Hilton Hotel, 500 
West 3rd Avenue, King Salmon/Illiamna Room, Anchorage, AK.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane DiCosimo, Council staff; 
telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Team will review the discussion papers 
on Vessel Monitoring System requirement and a discussion paper on 
proposed changes to the Halibut and sablefish IFQ Program.
    The Agenda posted at http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at (907) 271-2809 at least 7 
working days prior to the meeting date.


[[Page 14351]]


    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5795 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Howard SULLIVAN.

No. 89-K-0384.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Sullivan, Howard; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KA-0356; Parish of St. John the Baptist, 40th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 87-0123.

Prior report: La.App., 536 So.2d 847.

Denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2394 

To modify and extend temporarily the duty reduction on PHBA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify and extend temporarily the duty reduction on 

PHBA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHBA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.03 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 PHBA) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘3.1%’’ and inserting ‘‘Free’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2394 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41148

Conference Calendar

 

ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-00-CV-475

--------------------

June 19, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alejandro Gutierrez, Texas inmate #788616, appeals the

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as barred by the 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d) statute of limitations. The district court

granted Gutierrez a certificate of appealability. 

Gutierrez contends that equitable tolling applies because

his attorney did not notify him of the April 14, 1999, refusal of
No. 01-41148

-2-

his petition for discretionary review (“PDR”). Gutierrez asserts

that he learned of the decision on June 15, 1999. Gutierrez

relies on Phillips v. Donnelly, 216 F.3d 508, 511 (5th Cir.),

modified on limited grounds, 223 F.3d 797 (5th Cir. 2000), as

support for his position.

We review a district court’s decision on equitable tolling

for an abuse of discretion. Fisher v. Johnson, 174 F.3d 710, 713

(5th Cir. 1999). Equitable tolling applies when the plaintiff is

“actively misled” about the cause of action or is “prevented in

some extraordinary way from asserting his rights.” Coleman v.

Johnson, 184 F.3d 398, 402 (5th Cir. 1999) (citation and

quotations omitted). Ignorance of the law and pro se status do

not constitute “rare and exceptional” circumstances warranting

equitable tolling. Felder v. Johnson, 204 F.3d 168, 171-73 (5th

Cir. 2000). 

The instant case is distinguishable from Phillips. Although

Gutierrez contends that he did not learn of the April 14, 1999,

refusal of his PDR until June 15, 1999, he waited until June 1,

2000, to file a state habeas application, and he waited three

additional months following the denial of his state habeas

application to submit a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. In addition,

Gutierrez’s situation did not accompany a change in the law. 

Equitable tolling is for parties who proceed with “diligence

and alacrity.” Phillips, 216 F.3d at 511; see Fisher, 174 F.3d

at 715-16. Gutierrez’s self-imposed delays in filing a state
No. 01-41148

-3-

habeas application and a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition occurred after

he had learned of the delay caused by counsel. Gutierrez did not

act with “diligence and alacrity.” Phillips, 216 F.3d at 511. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### Mary A. SILVERS n/k/a Mary A. Fisk, Appellant, v. Ronald W. SILVERS, Appellee.

No. 86-2192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 11, 1987.

*31Steven H. Mezer of Mezer & Kipp, P.A., Clearwater, for appellant.

Calvin C. Roberts, St. Petersburg, for appellee.

LEHAN, Judge.

An ex-wife appeals from a post-dissolution order which required the divorced parties and their current spouses to attend psychological counseling sessions and parenting classes. We reverse.

The ex-wife filed a motion asking the trial court to hold the husband in contempt for his failure to pay child support arrear-ages as previously ordered by the court. The trial court entered an order denying the wife’s motion and directing the ex-husband to pay an additional $10.00 in weekly child support until the arrearages were fully paid. The trial court’s order additionally ordered the divorced parties and their current spouses to participate in joint counseling and to complete two junior college courses in parenting, communications, building self-esteem in the family, adjusting to divorce, or step-parenting.

The ex-wife contends that the trial court erred in ordering the counseling and classes because there was no notice of or motion for the imposition of these conditions nor was there any trial of these issues by the express or implied consent of the parties. The ex-wife also contends that the trial court erred in ordering the parties’ current spouses to participate in these activities since the court had no jurisdiction over the spouses.

We agree that the trial court had no jurisdiction to order the spouses to attend classes and counseling. We also agree that it was error to impose these conditions on the parties in the absence of a motion or other notice and opportunity to be heard on the issues. *See Brady v. Jones,*491 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); *McCaleb v. Mathis,*459 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).

We note that in an order by the trial judge which accompanied and approved of the parties’ stipulated statement of the proceedings, the trial judge recognized that she could not issue orders to nonparties and stated that it had been her intent to urge the parties and their current spouses to attend the classes and counseling in the hope that they would “recognize the importance of setting aside the hostile attitudes of the parties toward each other and the development of a more amicable relationship for the bénefit of their children and for their own peace of mind.” We share the trial court’s hope.

That portion of the trial court’s order requiring the parties and their spouses to attend counseling and junior college courses is reversed.

RYDER, A.C.J., and GRIMES, STEPHEN H., Associate Judge, concur.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6684]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13039 and <greek-i>13040]


Ohio Disaster <greek-i>OH-00032

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Ohio dated 03/13/2012.
    Incident: Tornadoes, High Winds and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 03/02/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/13/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/14/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/13/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Clermont.
Contiguous Counties:
    Ohio: Brown, Clinton, Hamilton, Warren.
    Kentucky: Bracken, Campbell, Pendleton.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.750
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.875
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.125
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13039 C 
and for economic injury is 13040 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are Ohio, 
Kentucky.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-6684 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P