alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000846014
<NAME> SOUTHEAST ACQUISITIONS III, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         359,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               359,293
<PP&E>                                       4,517,058
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,876,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,911
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,857,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,876,351
<SALES>                                        131,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,091
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,437,184
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,306,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,306,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.4.2


                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Leslie R. Scharfstein, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report,  of American  Express Credit
Account Master Trust;

2.  Based on my knowledge,  the information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5.  The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreement,
that is included in these reports.



Date:  March 29, 2004

/s/ Leslie R. Scharfstein
----------------------------
Name:  Leslie R. Scharfstein
Title: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, John H. Heyman, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the foregoing Annual Report of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company):

(1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d), and

(2) the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: May 4, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN H. HEYMAN                     
|                   |  |  |  | John H. Heyman, Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Mark E. Haidet, do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge,
the foregoing Annual Report of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the Company):

(1) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78 m or 78o(d), and

(2) the information contained in the periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: May 4, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ MARK E. HAIDET                     
|                   |  |  |  | Mark E. Haidet, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark M. Laisure, Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                      |                                                                                                                                           |                    
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
|                      |                                                                                                                                           |                    
|Date:  March 13, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                       | /s/ Mark M. Laisure
|                      | Mark M. Laisure                                                                                                                          
|                      | Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000846616
<NAME> BREMER FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         143,831
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,712
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    790,171
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         206,502
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           212,468
<LOANS>                                      2,172,631
<ALLOWANCE>                                     37,016
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,398,079
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,570,650
<SHORT-TERM>                                   353,213
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             51,568
<LONG-TERM>                                    116,286
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,079
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,889
<OTHER-SE>                                     277,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,398,079
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                186,963
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               57,734
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   828
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               245,525
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              97,660
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,424
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          124,101
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,570
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,296
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                107,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 62,788
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      41,511
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    41,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.06
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,074
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,142
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   178
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                110,195
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                34,253
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,971
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,164
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               37,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            31,100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,916
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


RELEASE OF CERTAIN GUARANTORS


 


Reference is made to that certain Ninth Supplemental Indenture,
dated as of June 17, 2020, as supplemented by that certain Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 2020, that certain
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 9, 2020 and that certain Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 13,
2020 (the “Ninth Supplemental Indenture”), among Service Properties Trust (formerly known as Hospitality Properties
Trust), a Maryland real estate investment trust, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), each of
the Subsidiaries listed on Schedule 1 attached hereto (each, a “Released Guarantor”) and certain other Subsidiaries
of the Company, as Guarantors, to the Indenture, dated as of February 3, 2016 (the “Indenture”), between the Company
and the Trustee, relating to the Company’s 7.50% Senior Notes due 2025 (the “Notes”). The terms defined in the
Ninth Supplemental Indenture are used herein as therein defined, unless otherwise defined herein.


 


Pursuant to Section 6 of the Ninth Supplemental Indenture,
the undersigned, as Trustee, hereby confirms the release and discharge of each Released Guarantor from any and all obligations
and liabilities under the Subsidiary Guarantee, and further hereby confirms the termination and release of each Released Guarantor
of all other obligations under the Ninth Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture or the Notes, each as of November 5, 2020.


 


	 	Dated as of November 13,
    2020.	 
	 	 	 
	 	U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Trustee	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/ David W. Doucette	 
	 	 	Name: David W. Doucette	 
	 	 	Title: Vice President	 




 




    


     


    


 


SCHEDULE 1


 


RELEASED GUARANTORS


 


		1.	Banner NewCo LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
		2.	Highway Ventures Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment trust
		3.	HPT Cambridge LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company
		4.	HPTWN Properties Trust, a Maryland real estate investment company
		5.	Royal Sonesta, Inc., a Louisiana corporation
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P.
(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            August
      12, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         184,709
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,351,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                 4,684,082
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,961,198
<PP&E>                                         222,059
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,569,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,288,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,961
<OTHER-SE>                                     812,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,569,963
<SALES>                                     17,062,873
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,062,873
<CGS>                                       13,436,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,436,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,718,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,403,815
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             505,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,066,619)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,137
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,495,854)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (300,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,343,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.23)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40418

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR CASTILLO-LUCIO, also known as

Jose Lopez Hernandez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. B-00-CR-488-1

--------------------

April 11, 2002

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Edgar Castillo-Lucio appeals the sentence imposed following

his conviction for illegally reentering the United States after

having been deported, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues

that the district court erred by concluding that his prior

conviction for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle was an

aggravated felony. However, he did not raise his argument in the

district court. Castillo-Lucio acknowledges that this court has
No. 01-40418

-2-

held that the offense is an aggravated felony, and avers that he

is raising the issue solely to preserve it for further review. 

 This court rejected the precise argument raised by CastilloLucio in United States v. Galvan-Rodriguez, 169 F.3d 217 (5th

Cir. 1999). Galvan-Rodriguez is binding precedent; therefore,

absent a decision by the Supreme Court or en banc consideration

by this Court, it cannot be overturned by another panel of this

court. See United States v. Arce, 118 F.3d 335, 338-39 (5th Cir.

1997). AFFIRMED.
#### Peggy COOMES v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. CA871341.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1987.

*437Robert Liptak, Denham Springs, for Peggy Coomes.

James Kuhn, Denham Springs, for Allstate Ins. Co.

Before COVINGTON, C.J., and SAVOIE and LeBLANC, JJ.

LeBLANC, Judge.

The issue presented to us is whether the appeal should be dismissed as moot.

Peggy Coomes filed a petition for damages against Arbeautia Thompson and Allstate Insurance Company. Thereafter, Allstate filed a motion for summary judgment. On June 8, 1987, the trial court signed a judgment granting the motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiff’s suit against Thompson and Allstate. On June 22, 1987, plaintiff filed a timely motion and order for appeal.

In September of 1987 Allstate filed, in the trial court, a “Motion and Order to Amend Judgment”.1 The trial court signed the order to amend, which states as follows:

> ON MOTION of James E. Kuhn, Attorney for defendant, and on suggesting to the Court that Mover requests that the Judgment rendered on May 18,1987, and signed on June 8, 1987, be amended to read as follows:

> “This matter came for hearing on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.

> ******

> “IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Allstate Insurance Company and Arbeautia Thompson be denied at the cost of defendants.”

> “Considering the foregoing Motion; “IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT that the Judgment signed on June 8, 1987, in the above captioned matter and the same is hereby amended as outlined hereinabove.”

Because of the above amendment, appel-lee-AUstate has filed a motion to dismiss appellant-Coomes’ appeal. Allstate argues the appeal is moot because the judgment has been amended in Coomes favor.

A moot case is one which seeks a judgment or decree which, when rendered, can give no practical relief. *Robin v. Concerned Citizens, St. Bernard, Inc.,*384 So.2d 405 (La.1980); *State in Interest of Minor Female Child,*470 So.2d 595 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985).

A trial court cannot amend the substance of a final judgment. La.Code Civ.P. art. 1951. *Almerico v. Katsanis,*458 So.2d 158 (La.App. 5th Cir.1984); *Naulty v. Oupac, Inc.,*448 So.2d 1322 (La.App. 5th Cir.1984). The timely application for a motion for new trial is the proper method for the trial court to effect a substantive change in a judgment. *Abney v. Allstate Ins. Co.,*442 So.2d 590 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983). The judgment may also be amended by appropriate contradictory proceedings. *Plantation Acceptance Corp. v. Stone,*379 So.2d 782 (La.App. 4th Cir.1979), writ denied, 383 So.2d 24 (La.1980). *438In the instant case neither of these procedures was followed. Accordingly, the original judgment rendered on June 8, 1987, granting the motion for summary judgment and dismissing Coomes suit, is valid. Therefore, the appeal is not moot.

For the above reasons the motion to dismiss is denied.

MOTION DENIED.

1

. Apparently, the trial court had intended to deny the motion for summary judgment. Nevertheless, a judgment had been prepared and signed granting the motion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-8523
WILLIE MCCRAY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. R. NICHOLSON; G. K. AULT; LIEUTENANT FEURY, Defendants - Appellees, and SHERIFF'S OFFICE; JAIL PHYSICIAN, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-94-1430-AM) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 8, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie McCray, Appellant Pro Se. Brian R. M. Adams, SPOTTS, SMITH, FAIN & RAWLS, P.C., Richmond, Virginia; Gary Albert Godard, GODARD, WEST & ADELMAN, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Nicholson , No. CA-94-1430-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 23 and Nov. 22, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS LE-RON CARRINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00388-JRS-2)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Le-Ron Carrington, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Travis Le-Ron Carrington appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to

Amendment 706. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Carrington , No. 3:00-
cr-00388-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Jan 15, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED