alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# STEVENSON 

# & MURRAY ATTORNEYS

AT 

# LAW A PRorI:ssIoNAL 

### CORPORATION 24 

### CREENWAY

PLAZA, 

### Sum; 750 JOHN W. Suvr~soN.

JR. 

### Housrow, TEXAS 

### 77046 w_ 

### ROM,“ HAND TELEPHONE : 7I3~622-3223 

### MARK

T‘ MllRRAYW‘- FACSIMILE : 7|3-622-3224 JEREMY

R_ 

### NEWELL WWW.]OllNSTEVl'NSONl.AW.('OM 

### www.sr:vr.NsoNMur<kAr.coM

'l‘.?i.”..$i2.'1‘i3’.§2.i?‘§:1 .L".’.‘,‘“.¥J:"‘

L“ July 1 7. 

### 201 5 “Bmln

Crlulnuv

C.I\‘I| Tun.

AIWOLAH 

### Nawm Bmunm Tm; Alwonur ?Ln run)

IN 

### Nm Van.


### The Honorable

Christopher



### A. Prine Clerk,

First 

### Court 

### ofAppeals 30] 

### Fannin

Street 

### Houston.



### Texas 

### 77002-2066 E—File 

### RE: Court



### ofAppeals

No.

### 01-15-00504-CV Trial 

### Court 

### Case No.: 

### 2012-24614 Style: lnocente



### Cepeda

v. 

### Orion 

### Marine

Construction,

Inc. 

### Dear Mr. Prine: 

### This letter in 

### response

to 

### your letter 

### of J uly 

### 16.2015

regarding



### payment

arrangements

for the 

### reporters

record

in the 

### above—refcrenced appeal.

## As

shown by the attachments,



### Appellant

paid the deposit



### requested



### by the reporter. 

### Once

the reporter

advises

Appellant's



### counsel



### of the 

### remainder 

### of the cost for the record,



### Appellant

will 

### remit the 

### remaining



### amount. 

### Should 

### you have 

### any questions.

please 

### do not hesitate

to call 

### our office. Sincerely.
/s/ 

### William



### Robert 

## Hand William

Robert 

## Hand



## WRH/lan Enclosure
cc: 

### Daniel



### D. Pipitone 

## Kcn Bullock E-File ACCEPTED 01-15-00504-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/17/2015 2:29:32 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2434

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain footwear.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain footwear.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOTWEAR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.47 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain footwear) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.s 333-123549 and 333-162309 on Form S-3 and in Registration Statement No.s 333-23237, 333-41327, 333-41291, 333-62157, 333-62151, 333-71892, 333-129391, 333-129392 and 333-155533 on
Forms S-8 of our reports dated March 11, 2010, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of Radiant Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Radiant Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Radiant Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|                         
|Atlanta, Georgia         
|March 11, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16313-16314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>13031 and <greek-i>13032]


North Carolina Disaster <greek-i>NC-00043

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of North Carolina dated 03/12/2012.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/03/2012.
    Effective Date: 03/12/2012.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/11/2012.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/12/2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Cherokee.
Contiguous Counties:
    North Carolina: Clay, Graham, Macon.

[[Page 16314]]

    Georgia: Fannin, Union.
    Tennessee: Monroe, Polk.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.750
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.875
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      3.125
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      3.000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13031C 
and for economic injury is 130320.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration <greek-i> are North 
Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: March 12, 2012.
Karen G. Mills,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-6682 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### STATE ex rel. Levi JOHNSON v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 88-KH-2277.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Johnson, Levi; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; *886Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 107 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
S. CON. RES. 107

   Expressing the sense of Congress concerning support for the Sixth 
               Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 13, 2000

   Mr. Akaka (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Kerry, Mr. Roth, and Mr. 
  Bingaman) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of Congress concerning support for the Sixth 
               Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference.

Whereas the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons (in this 
        concurrent resolution referred to as the ``Treaty'') entered into force 
        30 years ago on March 5, 1970;
Whereas the original 43 signatories have increased to 187 parties;
Whereas in 1995 the signatories agreed to extend the Treaty indefinitely;
Whereas the Treaty institutionalizes the commitment of the nonnuclear weapons 
        states not to acquire nuclear weapons;
Whereas the United States, the United Kingdom, France, the Russian Federation, 
        and China have committed themselves to a reduction of nuclear weapons;
Whereas the testing of nuclear weapons in South Asia by two countries that have 
        not adhered to the Treaty is cause for renewed attention to the dangers 
        of nuclear proliferation;
Whereas the International Atomic Energy Agency is responsible for monitoring 
        compliance with the Treaty and alerting the Secretary Council of any 
        violation;
Whereas Iraq's secret nuclear program, revealed in the aftermath of the Gulf 
        War, demonstrated the need for additional International Atomic Energy 
        Agency powers of information and collection; and
Whereas the Sixth Nonproliferation Treaty Review Conference will take place in 
        New York from April 24 to May 19, 2000: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That Congress--
            (1) reaffirms its support for the objectives of the Treaty 
        on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons and expresses 
        support for taking all appropriate measures to attain its 
        objectives;
            (2) expresses support for strengthening the international 
        verification system operated by the International Atomic Energy 
        Agency and for the new Additional Safeguards Protocol to the 
        International Atomic Energy Agency Safeguards Agreement that 
        the International Atomic Energy Agency is negotiating with each 
        adherent to the Treaty; and
            (3) calls on all parties participating in the Review 
        Conference to make a good faith effort to ensure the success of 
        the Conference.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. George REESE v. Jack F. DONNELLY, Warden.

No. 87-KH-2739.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 7, 1988.

In re Reese, George; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 273-127.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.
#### Thomas Wesley Lins POYER, Appellant, v. Barbara BURRIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jack Burris, deceased, and Theda Burris, Appellees.

No. 87-2550.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

John F. Muckerman, Miami Beach, for appellant.

Blackwell, Walker, Fascell & Hoehl and S. Alan Stanley, Miami, Joshua D. Bash, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

*889PER CURIAM.

The judgment below, which dismissed, for lack of standing, the instant attempt of Mrs. Poyer’s son and alleged potential beneficiary to set aside deeds executed by her, is affirmed. *Meyer v. Fogg,*7 Fla. 292 (1857); *In re Estate of Yelvington,*280 So.2d 497 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), cert, denied, 287 So.2d 98 (Fla.1973); *Ryan v. Brennan,*1 Mass.App.Ct. 469, 801 N.E.2d 257 (1973).1

1

. We specifically note that this determination is without prejudice to any such proceeding brought by Mrs. Poyer herself, by her guardianship should she be declared incompetent, or by her estate after her death.
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Re: OConnor - Response to PM Data Request

From: Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "O'Connor,George T" <goconnor@bu.edu>

Cc: Lindsay Stanek/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rebecca Yang/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 10/20/2009 09:02 PM

Subject: RE: Request for PM AQ data

Thank you for responding so quickly. We will review the paper more carefully for the requested 

information. 

Best reqards,

Beth

Beth M. Hassett-Sipple 

Environmental Health Scientist

Ambient Standards Group (C504-06)

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27711

(919) 541-4605

Hassett-Sipple.Beth@epa.gov

(919) 541-0237 (FAX)

-----"O'Connor, George T" <goconnor@bu.edu> wrote: -----

To: Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "O'Connor, George T" <goconnor@bu.edu>

Date: 10/20/2009 05:37PM

Subject: RE: Request for PM AQ data

Hi Beth,

The distributions of the criteria pollutants analyzed are presented in

our paper: O'Connor et al. (2008). "Acute respiratory health effects of

air

pollution on children with asthma in US inner cities." J. of Allergy and

Clinical Immunology 121: 1133-1139 e1131. HERO id 156818

All the pollution data used were obtained from the EPA AIRS database. 

Please let me know if additional specific information is needed.

Best regards,

George

George T. O'Connor, MD, MS

Professor of Medicine

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Boston University School of Medicine

715 Albany St., Room R304

Boston, MA 02118

Tel. 617-638-4470
Fax 617-638-5298

Email: goconnor@bu.edu
EXHIBIT
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason
Smart, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zandaria Ventures,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and




c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 9,
2009





/s/
Jason
Smart


Jason
Smart


Chief
Accounting Officer
# Europeiska unionens C 296A/3 au

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 296A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 65 årgången3 augusti 2022 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 296A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

65 årgången3 augusti 2022

---

| Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Gemensamma företaget Fusion for Energy |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Meddelande om ändring av meddelandet Det europeiska gemensamma företaget för Iter och utveckling av fusionsenergi (F4E) – Utlysning av en ledig tjänst som direktör (Tillfälligt anställd – lönegrad AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( EUT C 285 A, 26.7.2022 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Gemensamma företaget Fusion for Energy

2022/C 296 A/01

Meddelande om ändring av meddelandet Det europeiska gemensamma företaget för Iter och utveckling av fusionsenergi (F4E) – Utlysning av en ledig tjänst som direktör (Tillfälligt anställd – lönegrad AD 14) – COM/2022/20086 ( EUT C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

( EUT C 285 A, 26.7.2022 )

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Gemensamma företaget Fusion for Energy

| 3.8.2022 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 296/1

---

Meddelande om ändring av meddelandet Det europeiska gemensamma företaget för Iter och utveckling av fusionsenergi (F4E) – Utlysning av en ledig tjänst som direktör (Tillfälligt anställd – lönegrad AD 14) – COM/2022/20086

(
  Europeiska unionens tidning C 285 A av den 26 juli 2022
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

Sidan 5 ”Anställningsvillkor” sjätte stycket:

| I stället för: | ”Tjänsten är ledig från och med den 1 januari 2024.” |
| --- | --- |

I stället för:

”Tjänsten är ledig från och med den 1 januari 2024.”

| ska det stå: | ”Tjänsten är ledig från och med den 1 januari 2023.”. |
| --- | --- |

ska det stå:

ska det stå:

”Tjänsten är ledig från och med den 1 januari 2023.”.

---
#### STATE ex rel. Ronald Ray WEATHERS v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2581.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Weathers, Ronald Ray; applying for remedial writ; Parish of East Baton *454Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 12-73-7798.

Denied.
#### J.B. IVEY AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. John MERCHANT, Appellee.

No. 86-520.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 12, 1987.

Jeffrey G. Slater of Pitts, Eubanks, Hannah, Hilyard & Marsee, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

L. Edward McClellan, Jr., of McClellan, Vostrejs & Batsel, P.A., Ocala, and Wooten, Honeywell, Kest & Martinez, Orlando, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment in a personal injury suit. Appellant owns Ivey’s Department Stores.

Appellee was an employee of Olsten Temporary Services and was sent to Ivey’s to do some labor on a temporary basis. He was injured on the job when a shelf he stepped upon collapsed. He sued Ivey’s and the defense was a workers compensation bar. The trial court rejected that defense. We reverse.

This case is controlled by *Booher v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.,*468 So.2d 985 (Fla.1985) which affirmed the fourth district court’s ruling that:

> ... [wjhere a general employer in the business of providing temporary help provides compensation coverage to an employee while he is on assignment working for another employer then that employee is barred from suing his special employer for on-the-job injuries.

We are bound by that supreme court case and cannot agree with appellee that the facts here are distinguishable.

REVERSED.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and SHARP, J., concur.
Exhibit No. 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

      I, Patrick Montalban, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006


By /s/ Patrick Montalban
   ---------------------------------------
   Patrick Montalban, President
   (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lisa KENNEY.

No. 87-KK-1828.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Aug. 7, 1987.

In re Howard, D. Douglas Jr. — Other; Pedersen, Shawn Craddock — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 320-296; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-8380.

Granted. The ruling of the trial court is reversed, and the trial court is ordered to grant relator’s timely motion to withdraw. Because almost three weeks have elapsed since the filing of the motion, the granting of a continuance may be necessary for new counsel.