alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         51,629
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    473,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               554,243
<PP&E>                                         520,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (401,647)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 690,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          453,893
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,999
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   690,837
<SALES>                                        3,316,191
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,316,191
<CGS>                                          2,125,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,936,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (675,118)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (675,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (675,118)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.07)



</TABLE>
#### Estela M. HARP and Jeffrey Harp, her husband, Appellants, v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a foreign corporation, the Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, a foreign corporation, d/b/a Deseret Ranches of Florida, Inc., William Miller, and Brevard Cycle Sports, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

No. 4-86-2093.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Robert M. Scurfield of McClure & Associates, P.A., Yero Beach, for appellants.

Alan J. Landerman and Larry R. Roth of Rumberger, Kirk, Caldwell, Cabaniss & Burke, Orlando, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a non-final order, transferring a personal injury action from Indian River County to Osceola County. We affirm, having concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the change of venue sought by a defendant pursuant to section 47.122, Florida Statutes (1985). *See Tucker v. Fianson,*484 So.2d 1370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *Hu v. Crockett,*426 So.2d 1275 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); *Bingham v. Manson,*363 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). *See also Levy v. Hawk’s Cay, Inc.,*505 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), and cases cited therein.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prudential-Bache Capital Return
                    Futures Fund and is qualified in its entirety
                    by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<CIK>               0000846176
<NAME>              Prudential-Bache Capital Return Futures Fund
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          3,259,537

<SECURITIES>                    14,184,962

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                17,444,499

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,444,499

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           433,314

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      17,011,185

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    17,444,499

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                3,513,055

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                2,234,470

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    1,278,585

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   10.34

<EPS-DILUTED>                   10.34

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-4368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus MARIO CEDILLOS-GUZMAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00501-LMB) Submitted: September 13, 2007 Decided: September 18, 2007 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Anne M. Chapman, Meghan Skelton, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Chuck Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Olivia Hussey, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mario Cedillos-Guzman pled guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by an illegal alien, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(5); 924(a)(2) (2000). Cedillos-Guzman was sentenced by the district court to twelve months’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm. On appeal, Cedillos-Guzman contends his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to give proper weight to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000) factors, as well as provide a statement of reasons for selecting a twelve-month sentence. However, the district court appropriately calculated the advisory guideline range and considered it in conjunction with other relevant factors under the Guidelines and § 3553(a). See United States v. Moreland , 437 F.3d 424, 432-33 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2054 (2006). Cedillos-Guzman’s twelve-month sentence, which is at the lowest end of the applicable guideline range and below the statutory maximum, is therefore presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006); see alsoRita v. United States , 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2462-65 (2007). Though the court concededly failed to explicitly discuss § 3553(a) factors on the record, we conclude it does not render Cedillos-Guzman’s sentence unreasonable. See Rita , 127 S. Ct. at 2468-69; United States v. Johnson , 445 F.3d 339, 345 (4th Cir. 2006). We note that- 3 - the court heard extensive arguments from the parties relating to the potential applicability of § 3553(a) factors. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We deny as moot Cedillos-Guzman’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2362 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Thermostabilizer KL3– 

2049. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 

Thermostabilizer KL3–2049. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOSTABILIZER KL3–2049. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.77 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Thermostabilizer KL3–2049) is amended by striking the 

7 date in the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2362 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7542** 

STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.

JUSTIN ANDREWS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:14

- hc

- 02062

- BO )

Submitted : February 23, 2016 Decided: February 26, 2016

Before MOTZ and GREGORY , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Steven Dixon Prentice , Appellant Pro Se. Christina Ann Kelley , BUREAU OF PRISONS, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding p recedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Steven Dixon Prentice , a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court ’ s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2012) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration . We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Prentice

v. Andrews , No. 5:14

- hc

- 02062

- BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 18, 2015; Sept.
30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

* To the extent Prentice challenges the amount collected by the Bureau of Prisons, he failed to show exhaustion of his administrative rem edies.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of FUEGO ENTERTAINMENT, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Hugo M. Cancio, Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April
      20, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Hugo
      M. CancioHugo
      M. CancioTitle:
      Principal Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

WILLIAM HARRIS, JR.,

 Petitioner

 v.

PHILADELPHIA FACILITIES

MANAGEMENT CORPORATION AND

DANELLA COMPANIES, INC.,

 Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 63 EAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan Snyder, certify that:

(1)           I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.;

(2)           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(4)           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15(d) - 15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  | January 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Snyder           |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | Jonathan Snyder               |   |
|   |             |   | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|   |             |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
#### Nolan’s Estate.

*Wills*— Alleged *testamentary incapacity*— Intemperate habits— *Evidence*— Insufficiency. ' •

In an application for an issue devisavit vel non where the testimony shows that the testator was a man of intemperate habits, but at the time of the execution of the will he was perfectly sober and sane and understood exactly what he was doing the issue was properly refused.

Argued March 4, 1918.

Appeal, No. 205, Jan. T., 1917, by Charles J. Nolan, from decree of O. C. Berks Co., June T., 1916, No. 9, refusing issue devisavit vel non, in Estate of Francis Reilly Nolan, deceased.

Before Brown, C. J., Potter, Mosci-izisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Affirmed.

Petition for issue devisavit vel non. Before Wilhelm, P. J., specially presiding.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

The court refused the issue. Petitioner appealed.

*Error assigned*was the decree of the court.

*189
      *E. H. Deysher,*for appellant.

*H. P. Reiser,*for John Elwood Lee, appellee.

*Joseph R. Dickinson,*with bim *J. Bennett Nolan,*for Edward C. Nolan, Executor, Sisters of St. Francis, and Reading Trust Co., Trustee for Matilda McDonough, appellees.

April 22, 1918:

Per Curiam,

The learned judge below, specially presiding, found that the testator “appeared at the office of his attorney, unaccompanied by any person, and gave directions concerning the disposition he desired to .make of his property by will. The will was drawn in accordance with the directions received by the attorney. It was, on a subsequent visit to- the office of the attorney, read to the testator, and, upon being asked if that was the disposition of his property intended, he replied that it was. He desired certain persons to witness the will, and the will was taken by the testator and the son of the attorney who drew it to the store of the witnesses and there signed after the testator had declared it was his will. The attorney who drew the will, his son, and the two witnesses all testify that the testator was not intoxicated; that he was mentally capable at the time of its execution to dispose of his property by last will and testament.” In view of the testimony that, though the testator was a man of intemperate habits, he was at the time of the execution of his will perfectly sober and sane and understood exactly what he was doing, the issue asked for was properly refused: Tasker’s Est., 205 Pa. 455.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
Exhibit 32



Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Legacy Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) certifies that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 27, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    J. WILLIAR
DUNLAEVY                                           
|                       |  |  |  | J. Williar Dunlaevy Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                               
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 27, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    STEPHEN M. CONLEY                                                      
|                       |  |  |  | Stephen M. Conley Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Annette Eggert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |     |                               
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------
|Date: August
 19, 2009 | By: | /s/ Annette
 Eggert           
|                       |     |                               
|                       |     | Annette
 Eggert               
|                       |     | Chief
 Financial Officer      
|                       |     | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

---
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE/FINANCIAL OFFICERS

I, Harry Hargens, President/CEO and R.B.Harris, Chief Financial Officer , of
InstaPay Systems, Inc. and Subsidiary. ( the "Company" ), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December
31, 2003 (the " Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:    April 22, 2004


                               /S/ Harry Hargens
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               Harry Hargens, President/CEO/Director



                               /S/ R. B. Harris
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               R. B. Harris, Director/Chief Financial Officer















                                       48
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 COMMUNITY HOUSING RESOURCES, INC.,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 34,993 

5 ROBERT BOUGHTON and

6 LOUIS HILLE,

7 Defendants-Appellants. 

8 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 

9 Alan M. Malott, District Judge

10 Community Housing Resources, Inc.

11 Christopher Ocksrider

12 Albuquerque, NM

13 for Appellee

14 Robert M. Boughton

15 Louis A. Hille

16 Albuquerque, NM

17 Pro Se Appellants

18 MEMORANDUM OPINION

19 KENNEDY, Judge.
2

1 {1} Appellants Robert Boughton and Louis Hille (Defendants) appeal in a self2 represented capacity from the district court’s dismissal of their on-record appeal. Our

3 notice proposed to dismiss because Defendants failed to file the requisite notice of

4 appeal in the district court’s clerk’s office. See generally Govich v. North Am. Sys.,

5 Inc., 1991-NMSC-061, ¶ 12, 112 N.M. 226, 814 P.2d 94 (explaining that the time and

6 place of filing for the notice of appeal is a mandatory precondition to appellate

7 jurisdiction). Defendants did not file a timely memorandum in opposition, and this

8 Court denied their request to file an untimely memorandum in opposition.

9 Accordingly, for the reasons detailed in our notice, we dismiss. 

10 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 _______________________________

12 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge

13 WE CONCUR:

14 ___________________________________

15 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

16 ___________________________________

17 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge