alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2138 

To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Toluidine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Toluidine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. O-TOLUIDINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 o-Toluidine (CAS No. 95–53– 

4) (provided for in 

2921.43.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2138 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 23

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated January
21, 1998, included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of American
Freightways Corporation.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of American
Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is
the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to
express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement
schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-63674) pertaining to the American Freightways Corporation Stock
Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-76788) pertaining
to the American Freightways Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 21,
1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein
by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to
the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of
American Freightways Corporation and Subsidiaries.


                                     /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Little Rock, Arkansas
March 19, 1998
EXHIBIT 31.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)





I, George J. Coates, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Coates International, Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: March 29, 2010
By:
/s/ George J. CoatesGeorge J. CoatesPrincipal Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Cape Fear Bank Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ A. Mark Tyler                    
|                        |  |  |  | A. Mark Tyler                        
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### William A. LUCKY, III v. Anna Louise Whittington FRICKS, et al.

No. 87-C-2077.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Lucky, William A. Ill; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the *456Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18931-CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 68794.

Prior report: La.App., 511 So.2d 1315.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Annette Eggert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                      |     |                                                                          
|--------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March
 17, 2010 | By: |                                                                          
|                      |     |                                                                          
|                      |     | Annette
 Eggert 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 (Principal Financial Officer)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2082 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2082

   To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made 
                   fibers assembled as floral sprays.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made 
                   fibers assembled as floral sprays.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS ASSEMBLED AS FLORAL 
              SPRAYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Artificial flowers  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of man-made                                                        31/2011.......
                        fibers assembled
                        as floral sprays
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6702.90.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019

    Air Force Art Collection





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2021

    Focus on Priorities

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    CSAF Leadership Library    
        CSAF Leadership Library Bookshelf

    2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers





    Contact Us  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.7 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR ActOSI Tip Line
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY CALDWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:12-cr-00015-RLV-DCK-1; 5:14-cv00181-RLV)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Elizabeth Comerford, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, William Michael Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy 

Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Caldwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Caldwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kam Shah, Chief Executive Officer of WebTradex International Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kam Shah


Kam Shah


Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 16, 2010
 
 
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2006207EN.01000701.xml

| 28.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1144/2006

of 27 July 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 July 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 July 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 27 July 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 31,090 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2405 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2405

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modacrylic 
  stable fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modacrylic 
  stable fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC STABLE FIBERS, CARDED, COMBED, OR 
              OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.22 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acrylic or modacrylic stable 
fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. TIM OTHY JOHN YOST, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-10652

D.C . No. 4:12-c r-01612-DC B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na Jam e s P. Jone s, Distric t Judge , Pre siding ** Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 *** B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Tim othy John Yost a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 21-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for 

# FIL ED FEB 26 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The Honora

ble Ja m e s P. Jone s, Unite d State s Distric t Judge for the W e ste rn Distric t of Virginia , sitting by de signa tion. *** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c onspira c y

to tra nsport ille ga l a lie ns for the purpose of c om m e rc ia l a dva

nta ge or priva te fina nc ia l ga in, in viola

t ion of 8 U.S.C . § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I), (a )(1)(A)(ii), and (a )(1)(B )(i). W e dismiss. Yost c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d by orde ring tha

t his fe de ra l se nte nc e run c onse c utive ly to a n a ntic i pate d sta

te se nte n c e that ha d not y e t be e n im pose d at the tim e of fe de ra l se nte nc ing. Thegove rnm e nt a rgue s tha t this a ppe a l is ba rre d by a va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. W e re vie w de novo whe the r a de fe nda nt ha s wa ive d his right to a

ppe a l. Se eUnite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th C ir. 2009). Unde r the te rm s of his ple a a gre e m e nt, Yost waive d a ny right to a ppe a l the im position of sente nc e . Yost doe s not c onte nd tha t the a p pe a l wa ive r is inva lid or ina p plic a ble he re ; nor is these nte nc e ille ga l. Se eUnite d State s v . Bible r , 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th C ir. 2007) (“ A se nte nc e is ille ga l if it e xc e e ds thepe rm issible sta tutory pe na lty for the c rim e or viola

te s the C onstitution.” ); se ealso Se tse r v . Unite d State s , 132 S. C t. 1463, 1473 (2012) (distric t c ourt m ay

orde r se nte nc e to run c onse c utive ly

to a n a ntic ipate d sta

te se nte n c e ). Ac c ordingly , we dismiss in light of the

va lid a ppe a l wa ive r. Se eW

atson , 582 F.3d a

t 988. DISM I SSE D.

1 2 - 1 0 6 5 2 2