alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2013 Ark. 401



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-496 JAMES FLOWERS APPELLANT V. STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE Opinion Delivered OCTOBER 10, 2013 MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

GRANTED.

PER CURIAM James Flowers appealed his convictions for capital murder and aggravated robbery, for which he was sentenced concurrently to life without parole and 480 months’ imprisonment. This court affirmed. Flowers v. State , 373 Ark. 119, 282 S.W.3d 790 (2008). Flowers subsequently filed a petition for postconviction relief in the trial court pursuant to Rule 37 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. The trial court held a hearing and then denied the petition by order entered April 29, 2013. Counsel for Flowers, Mr. James P. Clouette, filed a notice of appeal and then, on June 6, 2013, lodged the record on appeal with this court. A brief was due to be filed on Flowers’s behalf on July 16, 2013. No brief has been filed, nor has any request for extension of time been filed. The State has now moved for dismissal of Flowers’s appeal from his postconviction proceedings due to the failure to file a brief. No response to the State’s motion has been filed. The State’s motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore granted.Cite as 2013 Ark. 401

There is no explanation on the record before us for counsel’s failure to file a brief and abandonment of this appeal after having lodged the record in this court. We therefore forward a copy of this opinion to this court’s Committee on Professional Conduct.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2456

    To extend the temporary reduction of duty on potassium sorbate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Cornyn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary reduction of duty on potassium sorbate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POTASSIUM SORBATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to potassium sorbate) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors and Shareholders 

Smith & Nephew plc

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-122801, No. 333-13694, No. 333-12052, No. 33-39814, No. 333-155173,No. 333-155172, No. 333-158239, No. 333-168544, No. 333-199117) on Form S-8 of Smith & Nephew plc of our report dated 24 February 2016, with respect to the group balance sheet of Smith & Nephew plc and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015,and the related group income statement, group statement of comprehensive income, group cash flow statement and group statement of changes in equity, for the year then ended, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2015, which report appears in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 20-F of Smith & Nephew plc. 

Our report refers to a change incomposition of reportable segments and to our audit of the adjustments that were applied to reflect such change in the 2014 and 2013 group financial statements, as more fully described in Note 2 to the group financial statements. However, we werenot engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2014 and 2013 group financial statements other than with respect to such adjustments. 

/s/KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP 

London, United Kingdom 

4 March 2016
#### Gertrude BERGER and Howard Berger, Appellants, v. Robert L. LEWISON, as Trustee, Appellee.

No. 87-1304.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 8, 1988.

Alec Ross, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

Ruden, Barnett, McClosky, Smith, Schus-ter & Russell and W. Wyndham Geyer, Jr., Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before HUBBART and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the mortgagor Gertrude Berger and her attempted-intervenor husband Howard Berger from an adverse final judgment of mortgage foreclosure involving a condominium unit in which Mr. and Mrs. Berger resided. We affirm based on the following, briefly stated legal analysis.

First, the subject condominium unit was not a homestead estate under Article X, Section 4(a)(1) of the Florida Constitution (1968), because neither of the title owners of this unit, Gertrude Berger and her daughter Ina Felder, was the “head of the family” as required by the above constitutional provision in order for property to constitute a homestead estate.1 Without dispute, Howard Berger was the “head of the family” within the meaning of the above constitutional provision, and he was not, as urged, the owner of the subject condominium unit; his affidavit filed below claiming a beneficial interest in the property was properly struck by the trial court as being contrary to his deposition testimony. *See Ellison v. Anderson,*74 So.2d 680 (Fla.1964); *Elison v. Goodman,*395 So.2d 1201, 1202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); *Inman v. Club On Sailboat Key, Inc.,*342 So.2d 1069, 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); *Kramer v. Landau,*113 So.2d 756, 758 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959).

*312Second, this being so, Gertrude and Ina Felder properly alienated the condominium unit by placing a mortgage thereon. It was unnecessary for Howard Berger, as Gertrude's spouse, to have joined in this conveyance under Article X, Section 4(c) of the Florida Constitution (1968 as amended 1972), because (a) such a joinder with the owner is constitutionally required only as to “homestead real estate,” and, (b) as previously indicated, the instant condominium unit was not a homestead estate. *Holden v. Gardner’s Estate,*420 So.2d 1082 (Fla.1982); *Jones v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.,*138 Fla. 65, 188 So. 804 (1939); *Abernathy v. Gruppo,*119 So.2d 398 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960); *Anderson v. Garber,*183 So.2d 693 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), *cert. denied,*188 So.2d 820 (Fla.), *appeal dismissed,*189 So.2d 631 (Fla.1966).

Third, it accordingly follows that no error was committed below in denying Gertrude Berger’s motion to dismiss, in refusing to allow Howard Berger to intervene, in entering a partial judgment on Gertrude Berger’s homestead defense, and in striking Howard Berger’s affidavit. The final judgment under review is, in all respects,

Affirmed.

1

. The 1985 amendment to the above constitutional provision, which substituted "natural person" for "head of the family,” has no application to this case because the. mortage at issue herein was executed prior to the said 1985 amendment. Art. X, § 4(a)(1), Fla. Const. (1968 as amended 1985).
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2413 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6- 

tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-2,5-pyrrolidinedione. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-Dodecyl1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-2,5-pyrrolidinedione. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-DODECYL-1-(2,2,6,6-TETRAMETHYL-4- 

4 PIPERIDINYL)-2,5-PYRROLIDINEDIONE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.12 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 3-Dodecyl-1-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-piperidinyl)-2,5- 

8 pyrrolidinedione) is amended by striking the date in the 

9 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2413 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Swanson, Brian (OST) bf)r'O^T'ZOo4' 1^*^S4^ 

From: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:18 AM 

To; 'Larry Dalrymple' 

Cc; Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: RE: Pendleton EAS 

1 -* , •» 

Great, thx. We will pencil in Oct 12 to expect comments. Thx. c'-i ;-n .H-

— Qf-g^ 

From: Larry Dalrymple [mailto:econairp@uci.net] "^ "^^ S 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:16 AM J) W^ ^ 

To; Devany, Dennis (OST) O^*--* 

Subject: Re: Pendleton EAS " 2:^" ^ 

This will be good enough. Next Council meeting is October 5, so we could have comments back to you shortly after that. 

Original Message 

From: Dennis.DeVanv@dot.aov 

To: econairp@uci.net; brian.swanson@dot.qov 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 7:59 AM 

Subject: RE: Pendleton EAS 

Seaport, SkyWest & Sovereign. See attached. Do you want us to send a formal letter requesting your comments, or is 

this good enough? If so, could piz pass on to the mayor, city attorney etc? And when would expect the community's 

response to us? 

DD 

From: Larry Dalrymple [mailto:econairp@uci.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:56 AM 

To: Swanson, Brian (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Pendleton EAS 

What was the result of the RFP?
##### 



EXHIBIT 32(ii) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Alan R. Simon, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Consulier Engineering, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Consulier
Engineering, Inc. and Subsidiaries. Dated:  April 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Alan R. SimonAlan R. Simon, Esq.Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer) E-4
III

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 132

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the Senate and a

conditional adjournment of the House of Representatives.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. LOTT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was considered

and agreed to

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Providing for a conditional adjournment or recess of the

Senate and a conditional adjournment of the House of

Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That, in consonance with section 132(a) of

3 the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946, when the Sen4 ate recesses or adjourns at the close of business on Thurs5 day, July 27, 2000, Friday, July 28, 2000, or on Satur6 day, July 29, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this

7 concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his des8 ignee, it stand recessed or adjourned until noon on Tues9 day, September 5, 2000, or until noon on Wednesday,

10 September 6, 2000, or until such time on either day as
2

SCON 132 ATS

1 may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee

2 in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the

3 second day after Members are notified to reassemble pur4 suant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever

5 occurs first; and that when the House adjourns on the

6 legislative day of Thursday, July 27, 2000, or Friday, July

7 28, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent

8 resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand

9 adjourned until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 6,

10 2000, or until noon on the second day after Members are

11 notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this concur12 rent resolution, whichever occurs first.

13 SEC. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the

14 Speaker of the House, acting jointly after consultation

15 with the Minority Leader of the Senate and the Minority

16 Leader of the House, shall notify the Members of the Sen17 ate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, in

18 their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.

Æ
EXHIBIT 23
                                                                      ----------



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc.
Brentwood, New York

                  We hereby consent to the inclusion in the Allou Health &
Beauty Care, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 1999
of our report dated June 2, 1999 related to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of Allou Health & Beauty Care, Inc. and subsidiaries.






/S/ MAYER RISPLER & COMPANY, P.C.
Certified Public Accountants

June 29, 1999
New York, New York
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2391 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Benzenesulfonic acid, [(9,10- 

dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4-anthracenediyl)bis[imino[3-(2-methylpropyl)–3,1- 

propanediyl]]]bis-, disodium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Benzenesulfonic acid, [(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4- 

anthracenediyl)bis[imino[3-(2-methylpropyl)–3,1- 

propanediyl]]]bis-, disodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENZENESULFONIC ACID, [(9,10-DIHYDRO-9,10- 

4 DIOXO-1,4-ANTHRACENEDIYL)BIS[IMINO[3-(2- 

5 METHYLPROPYL)–3,1-PROPANEDIYL]]]BIS-, DI6 SODIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.95 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2391 IS

1 Benzenesulfonic acid, [(9,10-dihydro-9,10-dioxo-1,4- 

2 anthracenediyl)bis[imino[3-(2-methylpropyl)–3,1- 

3 propanediyl]]]bis-, disodium salt) is amended by striking 

4 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
From: Palazzolo, Michael A.

Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 8:28 AM

To: David Putney

Cc: Bilskis, Patricia A.; Mitchell, Kathryn M

Subject: Intalco POM Test Data

David,

Attached are the results of POM emission tests performed on Potline C at the Intalco facility. This 

facility operates sidework prebake (SWPB) potlines.

The attached file is a zip file containing the following:

1) ZipFile_Contents.txt

2) 2011_PotlineC_DryScrubs_Operation_Status_during_POMtest.pdf (Copy

of records that show dry scrubbers operating during source tests)

3) 2011_PotlineC_WetScrubs_Operation_Status_during_POMtest.pdf (Copy of records that show wet 

scrubbers operating during source tests)

4) report_2011_PotlineC_DryScrubs_POM.pdf (Source test report from source testing firm)

5) report_2011_PotlineC_WetScrubs_POM.pdf (Source test report form source testing firm

6) Intalco_Production_data_LineC.XLS (PODS data, Records that show C line production during the 

month of source testing)

7) 2011_Intalco_total_Potline_POM.xlsx (Spreadsheet that calculates total potline POM emissions)

Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the test results.

Regards,

Mike

Michael Palazzolo

Alcoa Inc.

201 Isabella Street

Pittsburgh, PA 15212-5858

Ph: 412-553-4832
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Hayward PREVOST.

No. 89-KK-0611.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW89 0128; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 176409.

Denied. Moot. Copies of the initial report have been made public by attaching them to the application for review in this Court.

LEMMON and COLE, JJ., would grant the writ.
<PAGE>


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (No. 333-38765) on Form S-3, the registration statement (No.
333-38759) on Form S-4 and the registration statement (No. 333-71063) on Form
S-8 of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated February 8, 1999, on our audit
of Defense Systems Colombia S.A. as of December 31, 1998, and for the year then
ended, which appears on page F-3 of Armor Holdings, Inc.'s annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. We also consent to the
reference to our firm under the caption "Experts".



                                                      Deloitte & Touche

Santa fe de Bogota, Colombia
March 25, 1999
III

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 26

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax

deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home

should not be further restricted.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 15, 1999

Mr. ASHCROFT submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was

referred to the Committee on Finance

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the Congress that the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first or second home should not be further

restricted.

Whereas homeownership is a fundamental American ideal,

which promotes social and economic benefits beyond the

benefits that accrue to the occupant of the home;

Whereas homeownership is an important factor in promoting

economic security and stability for American families;

Whereas it is proper that the policy of the Federal Government is, and should continue to be, to encourage homeownership;

Whereas the rate of homeownership grew from 64.7 percent

of households in 1995 to 67 percent in 1998;
2

•SCON 26 IS

Whereas the housing needs of the population will change as

the population ages;

Whereas the greatest growth sectors in homeownership are

minorities and first-time homebuyers;

Whereas the level of homeownership among foreign-born naturalized citizens who have been in the United States for

at least 6 years is the same as the level of homeownership of the Nation as a whole (67 percent in 1998);

Whereas the value of a home represents a valuable source of

savings for a family;

Whereas the provisions related to homeownership are among

the simplest and most easily administered provisions of

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by a first home has been a valuable cornerstone of this Nation’s housing policy for most

of this century and may well be the most important component of housing-related tax policy in America today;

Whereas the current Federal income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured by second homes is of crucial

importance to the economies of communities in each of

the 50 States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that the Fed3 eral income tax deduction for interest paid on debt secured

4 by a first or second home should not be further restricted.

Æ
#### Lori S. FERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent.

No. 03-3188.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 8, 2003.

ORDER

Order Vacated, see 2003 WL 21377707.

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

*234ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2231 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration 

systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS WITH A CARGO 

4 STORAGE EXCEEDING 2200 CUBIC INCHES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2231 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Insulated hydration systems 

with an outer surface of textile materials whose interior 

incorporates a flexible plastic 

container of a kind for storing and dispensing potable 

beverages through attached 

flexible tubing and which 

have a cargo storage capacity 

exceeding 2200 cubic inches 

(provided for in subheading 

4202.92.30) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### Mila Jane Burnett REISZNER v. Kenneth Dean REISZNER.

No. 86-CC-2420.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Reiszner, Kenneth Dean; applying for reconsideration of the January 23,1987, 500 So.2d 421, denial of writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, and supervisory writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge, Family Court of East Baton Rouge, Div. B, No. 50666.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2366 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2366

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 50 Percent Amine Neutralized 
         Phosphated Polyester Polymer, 50 Percent Solvesso 100.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 50 Percent Amine Neutralized 
         Phosphated Polyester Polymer, 50 Percent Solvesso 100.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 50 PERCENT AMINE NEUTRALIZED PHOSPHATED POLYESTER POLYMER, 
              50 PERCENT SOLVESSO 100.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      50 Percent Amine    0%           No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Neutralized                                                        31/2011.......
                        Phosphated
                        Polyester
                        Polymer, 50
                        Percent Solvesso
                        100 (provided for
                        in subheading
                        3907.99.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```