alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-642]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL11-44-000]


Iberdrola Renewables, Inc., PacifiCorp, NextEra Energy Resources, 
LLC, Invenergy Wind North America LLC, Horizon Wind Energy LLC v. 
Bonneville Power Administration; Notice of Designation of Certain 
Commission Personnel as Non-Decisional

    Commission staff members Steve Rodgers and Saeed Farrokhpay, both 
of the Office of Energy Market Regulation, are assigned to assist in 
developing tariff provisions that are responsive to the Commission's 
December 7, 2011 order issued in the above-referenced docket and/or a 
settlement agreement in this proceeding.
    As ``non-decisional'' staff, Messrs. Rodgers and Farrokhpay will 
not participate in an advisory capacity in the Commission's review of 
any future filings in the above-referenced docket, including offers of 
settlement or settlement agreements.
    Different Commission ``advisory staff'' will be assigned to review 
and process subsequent filings that are made in the above-referenced 
docket, including any offer of settlement or settlement agreement. Non-
decisional staff and advisory staff are prohibited from subsequent 
communications with one another concerning matters in the above-
referenced docket.

    Dated: January 6, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-642 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ PETER J. UNGAROPeter J. UngaroChief Executive Officer and President
S A N I T I Z E D EPICLON HP - 4700 HYDROL

YSIS TEST
#### Luis BECEIRO-MESA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 15, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Debora J. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*910Before BASKIN, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ., concur.

BASKIN, Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent because the reasons enunciated by the trial court do not constitute valid justification for departure from the sentencing guidelines under the facts of this case. *See Anthony v. State,*524 So.2d 655 (Fla.1988); *Davis v. State,*517 So.2d 670 (Fla.1987); *Mathis v. State,*515 So.2d 214 (Fla.1987); *Vanover v. State,*498 So.2d 899 (Fla.1986); *Williams v. State,*492 So.2d 1308 (Fla.1986); *Crosby v. State,*518 So.2d 477 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); *Brown v. State,*511 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). *Cf. Traver v. State,*502 So.2d 1009 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (semi-invalid left helpless for fifteen hours). “An appellate court must look only to the reasons for departure enumerated by the trial court and must not succumb to the temptation to formulate its own reasons to justify the departure sentence.” *Casteel v. State,*498 So.2d 1249, 1252 (Fla.1986); *see Mayo v. State,*518 So.2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 16, 2012.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond**                     (Adam M. Drimer, Assistant Vice President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:                

                    1.                     *BNC Bancorp,*                     High Point, North Carolina; to merge with KeySource Financial, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire KeySource Commercial Bank, both in Durham, North Carolina.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 19, 2012.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6934 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### FIRST GUARANTY BANK v. BATON ROUGE PETROLEUM CENTER.

No. 87-C-1122.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 12, 1987.

In re First Guaranty Bank; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 0915; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 46142.

Prior report: La.App., 507 So.2d 22.

Granted.
Exhibit 32.2


  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Utilicraft  Aerospace
Industries,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Randy Moseley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


   Date: August 10, 2007
                                                         /s/ Randy Moseley
                                                         -----------------
                                                         Randy Moseley
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Humberto Bravo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Placer Del Mar's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Placer Del Mar, Ltd.


                                      By: /s/ Humberto Bravo
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Humberto Bravo
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that Placer Del Mar, Ltd. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
#### David Michael HOLDSWORTH v. RENEGADES OF LOUISIANA, INC., d/b/a Cowboys Club & Restaurant, et al.

No. 87-C-2796.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Holdsworth, David Michael; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to *127the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19207-CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 64770.

Prior report: La.App., 516 So.2d 1299.

Denied.

DENNIS, J. would grant the writ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

p0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

137730

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137730 COA: 285761 Wayne CC: 89-006001 RICHARD KILBOURNE, a/k/a RICHARD KILBOURN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         140,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,323
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (70,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (70,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (70,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |   |
| November      19, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Curt      Thornton                                                                                                                                        |   |
|                   |   | Curt      Thornton                                                                                                                                                 |   |
|                   |   | Chief      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial      Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) and      Director |   |
|                   |   |                                                                                                                                                               |   |
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2327-2328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-664]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No.: 50-333; NRC-2012-0006]


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Notice of Withdrawal of 
Application for Amendment to Facility Operating License

    The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission)

[[Page 2328]]

has granted the request of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (the 
licensee) to withdraw its January 13, 2011 (Agencywide Documents and 
Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML110130436), application for 
the proposed amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License (FOL) No. 
DPR-59 for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant, located in 
Oswego County, New York.
    The proposed amendment would have modified the Renewed FOL by 
deleting references to specific Safety Evaluation Reports, Technical 
Specification Amendments, and Exemptions from License Condition 2.C(3), 
Fire Protection, and replacing them with the words ``as supplemented.''
    The Commission had previously issued a Notice of Consideration of 
Issuance of Amendment published in the Federal Register on February 22, 
2011 (76 FR 9823). However, by letter dated January 4, 2012 (ADAMS 
Accession No. ML120050483), the licensee withdrew the proposed change.
    For further details with respect to this action, see the 
application for amendment dated January 13, 2011, and the licensee's 
letter dated January 4, 2012, which withdrew the application for 
license amendment. Documents may be examined, and/or copied for a fee, 
at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint 
North, Public File Area O1 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 
Rockville, Maryland. Publicly available documents created or received 
at the NRC are accessible electronically through the ADAMS in the NRC 
Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not 
have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the 
documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff 
by telephone at 1-(800) 397-4209, or (301) 415-4737 or by email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99e9fdebb7ebfceaf6ecebfafcd9f7ebfab7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="78081c0a560a1d0b170d0a1b1d38160a1b561f170e">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of January 2012.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Bhalchandra K. Vaidya,
Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch I-1, Division of Operating 
Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2012-664 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Patsy HUDDLESTON.

No. 87-K-2432.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Huddleston, Patsy; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KA86-0835; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 11436-83.

Prior report: La.App., 517 So.2d 902.

Denied.
# Eiropas Savienības C 296A/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 296A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 65. gadagājums2022. gada 3. augusts |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 296A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

65. gadagājums2022. gada 3. augusts

---

| Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Kopuzņēmums Fusion for Energy |
| 2022/C 296 A/01 | Paziņojums, ar ko groza paziņojumu ITER un kodolsintēzes enerģētikas attīstības vajadzībām izveidotais Eiropas kopuzņēmums (F4E) – Sludinājums par direktora vakanci (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2022/20086( OV C 285 A, 26.7.2022. ) | 1 |

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Kopuzņēmums Fusion for Energy

2022/C 296 A/01

Paziņojums, ar ko groza paziņojumu ITER un kodolsintēzes enerģētikas attīstības vajadzībām izveidotais Eiropas kopuzņēmums (F4E) – Sludinājums par direktora vakanci (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2022/20086( OV C 285 A, 26.7.2022. )

ITER

F4E

( OV C 285 A, 26.7.2022. )

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Kopuzņēmums Fusion for Energy

| 3.8.2022 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 296/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2022

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 296/1

---

Paziņojums, ar ko groza paziņojumu “ITER un kodolsintēzes enerģētikas attīstības vajadzībām izveidotais Eiropas kopuzņēmums (F4E) – Sludinājums par direktora vakanci (pagaidu darbinieks – AD 14 pakāpe) – COM/2022/20086”

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 285 A, 2022. gada 26. jūlijs
  )

(2022/C 296 A/01)

5. lappusē iedaļas “Nodarbināšanas kārtība” sestajā daļā:

| tekstu: | “Amata vieta ir pieejama no 2024. gada 1. janvāra.” |
| --- | --- |

tekstu:

“Amata vieta ir pieejama no 2024. gada 1. janvāra.”

| lasīt šādi: | “Amata vieta ir pieejama no 2023. gada 1. janvāra.” |
| --- | --- |

lasīt šādi:

lasīt šādi:

“Amata vieta ir pieejama no 2023. gada 1. janvāra.”

---
#### John SMITH, Appellant, v. ORANGE COUNTY, Florida, etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 87-1106.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Feb. 4, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 1, 1988.

Ralph B. Leemis, of Leemis *&*Boives, Orlando, for appellant.

Steven F. Lengauer and Timothy H. David, of Pitts, Eubanks, Hilyard, Rumbley & Meier, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in a wrongful employment termination case. Because there are disputed issues of fact left unresolved we reverse the judgment. For instance, while it is the appellees’ contention appellant was hired around the end of September or the beginning of October, the appellant appears to be correct in his contention he began to work for the county on June 1. If he is correct then he may be entitled to certain procedural due process protections which were denied him by the county. The sum*306mary judgment is reversed. *See Holl v. Talcott,*191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.