alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32











CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL


OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Shaun Passley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
EPAZZ, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of EPAZZ, Inc.





Date:  August
19, 2008





By:/s/
Shaun Passley


Shaun
Passley,


Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and


Principal
Accounting Officer
EDGAR HTML



      

      

         


      



      Exhibit 4.3


      Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


      We have issued our report dated November 24, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 498 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-248065) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


      


      
         	

                  


               	

                  /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP


               


      


      Chicago, Illinois 


      November 24, 2020
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2439 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain seals 

designed for use in aircraft. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain seals designed for use in aircraft. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEALS DESIGNED FOR USE IN AIR4 CRAFT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.84 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain seals designed for use in aircraft) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking the article description and in9 serting the following: ‘‘Seals, made of silicone, or 

10 rubber, and either covered with, and/or containing, 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2439 IS

1 an embedded textile material, designed for use in 

2 aircraft (provided for in subheading 5911.90.00)’’; 

3 and 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) apply with respect to goods entered, or 

8 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

9 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Provision Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Curt Thornton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: February 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Curt ThorntonChief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board,

President and Director(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Provision Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Provision Holding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### James B. FARRINGTON, Jr. v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0449.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 16, 1993.

Kelly McKoin, D’Iberville, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Mary Margaret Bowers, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal No. 25003 from Judgment dated March 27, 1991, James E. Thomas, Ruling Judge, Harrison County, Circuit Court, First Judicial District.

Before HAWKINS, C.J., and SULLIVAN and SMITH, JJ.

Affirmed.
#### Alfonzo MITCHELL, Appellant, v. LITTRELL CONCRETE and Whiting National Services, Appellees.

No. BN-400.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 11, 1987.

E. Douglas Spangler, Jr., Sarasota, for appellant.

Claire L. Hamner and John J. O’Riorden, of Dickinson, O’Riorden, Gibbons, Quale, Shields & Carlton, P.A., Sarasota, for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Alfonzo Mitchell suffered an industrial injury on August 13, 1984. Appellant appeals from a worker’s compensation order which denied his claim for temporary total disability and temporary partial disability benefits and payment of medical bills. We find the order inadequate to explain the extensive medical evidence in this record, and therefore inadequate to provide this court a basis for appropriate review. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for entry of a more definitive order regarding the deputy’s implicit rejection of the medical testimony.

Reversed and remanded for entry of a proper order.

BOOTH, C.J., and JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2245 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain children’s products. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

children’s products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain children’s optical products) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2245 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32
 CERTIFICATION
 OF
 PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  I,
WenXiang Ding, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of China Energy Corporation for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of China Energy Corporation.
  I, Fu Xu,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China
Energy Corporation for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of China Energy Corporation.
  
  By: 
/s/ WenXiang
Ding
 WenXiang
Ding
 Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
  
  By: 
/s/ Fu
Xu
 Fu
Xu
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
  July 21,
2009
  26
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  except to the
               extent that such  provisions  requrie the filing of an opinion of
               registiered  public  accountants  to accompany the  Partnership's
               financial statements; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.




/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
Date:    November 8, 2005
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: December 10, 2007 |  | /s/ Carmel Vernia
Carmel VerniaChief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: ___________________________

Project No.: 0172.09.029.041 DISTRIBUTION

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam Electric Rulemaking

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Outgoing Call

Date: 10/13/2011 Time: 10:30 AM

Company Name: Georgia Power Co (McManus Power Plant)

Contact Name: W.R. Evans

Phone No.: 404-506-7031

Name: Elizabeth Sabol, Eastern Research Group

GENERAL SUBJECT : McManus Power Plant Wet Oil Ash

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I contacted Mr. Evans with Georgia Power, Co. to discuss the fly ash handling systems for oil-fired Units 1 and 

2 at the McManus Power Plant. Mr. Evans stated that for the Steam Electric Survey, the plant reported zero for 

the ash amounts because the oil units did not operate in 2009. He mentioned that McManus is an older plant that 

is continually being evaluated for retirement, and it is not operating at the moment. 

Mr. Evans also explained that they do not collect fly and bottom ash separately. He explained that there is no fly 

ash production; however, there is a bottom ash residue on the interior walls of the boiler and the bottom 

hoppers. During outages, the plant shovels the ash out and transports it in drums or wheel barrels to two above 

ground, concrete ponds. Mr. Evans stated that if the plant were in full operation, they would perform this 

procedure once a year and produce several 55 gallon drums of the bottom ash residue. He also stated that the 

plant has the option of doing a "full clean" if operating at full load in which case the bottom ash would be 

washed with a hose, drained to the sumps, and pumped to the above ground, concrete ponds. 

Only the ash water and low volume wastes from the floor sumps are sent to the two above ground, concrete 

ponds. These ponds also collect rainfall. The overflow from these ponds gravity drains to an old ash pond (the 

plant previously burned coal). The concrete ponds do not directly discharge to surface water. Overflow from the 

old ash pond gravity drains to the surrounding marshes/surface water. He stated that the ash in the basins would 

likely not be removed until the plant shut down. Metal cleaning wastes are not commingled with this waste

stream, they are handled separately and trucked off site.
#### STATE ex rel. Bryant THOMAS v. Charles C. FOTI, Sheriff.

No. 87-KH-0903.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Thomas, Bryant; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus or ha-beas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”.

Denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7705

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLARENCE SHELDON JUPITER, a/k/a Star,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Michael F. Urbanski, 

District Judge. (5:93-cr-00004-MFU-1; 7:98-cv-00016-MFU)

Submitted: August 20, 2015 Decided: August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray 

Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, 

for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Sheldon Jupiter seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Jupiter has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Jupiter’s motion for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-665]



[[Page 2308]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

 Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Altol Petroleum Product Service, as a Commercial 
Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Altol Petroleum Product Service, as a 
commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Altol 
Petroleum Product Service, Parque Industrial Sabanetas, Edificio M-
1380-01-02, Ponce, PR 00731, has been approved to gauge petroleum, 
petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone 
wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request 
and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger 
service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific 
gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#305352401e5c51525841705458431e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="711213015f1d10131900311519025f161e07">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories: http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Altol Petroleum Product Service, as commercial 
gauger became effective on March 12, 2010. The next triennial 
inspection date will be scheduled for March 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Cassata, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-
1060.

    Dated: December 9, 2011.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-665 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Jeffrey FIELDS, Petitioner, v. Honorable Martin GREENBAUM, Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, Respondent.

No. 87-2962.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 1, 1988.

Michael A. Catalano, Miami, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Joni B. Braunstein and Nancy C. Wear, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Fields seeks a writ of prohibition following the trial court’s denial of his motion to discharge pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191. In response to our rule nisi, counsel for the state has commendably indicated that the facts in this case are substantially similar to those in *State ex rel. Smith v. Nesbitt,*355 So.2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We grant prohibition on that authority.1

Prohibition granted.

1

. We presume it will not be necessary to issue the writ formally.
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 1182 Directorate ID: 2010 - SW - 010 - AD Airworthiness Directives; Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. (Bell), Model 205A

– 1, 205B, 210, and 212 Helicopters . Number of Helicopters (U .S. Operators): We estimate 132 helicopters of U.S. registry. Reason : This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for Bell Model 205B and 212 helicopters with certain main rotor blade (blade) assemblies installed. That AD requires w ashing the upper and lower surfaces of each blade and visually inspecting the grip plates, doublers, and the remaining upper and lower surfaces of the blades in the area between blade stations 24.5 to 40 for an edge void, corrosion, or a crack. This amendment retains the requirements of that AD for the affected part - num bered blades but increases the scope and frequency of the inspections and expands the applicability to include the Model 205A

– 1 and 210 helicopters, additional blade part numbers, and all hel icopter serial numbers for the affected helicopter models. This amendment also requires applying a light coat of preservative oil (C

– 125) to all surfaces of the blade in addition to the inspection areas as required in the existing AD. This amendment is pro mpted by an additional report of a fatigue crack on a blade installed on a Model 212 helicopter. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a blade, and to prevent loss of a blade and subsequent loss of c ontrol of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $85,597 for a replacement blade. Labor per Helicopter (XX x $85/work - hour) Washing and inspecting each blade: about 1 work hour X $85 = $85. Replacing a blade with an airworthy blade: about 24 work hours X $85 = 2,040. Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $85 for inspection; $87,637 to replace blade. Total US Fleet Cost $356,917, assuming that 24 inspections are done each year on each helicopter and that 1 blade is replaced. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?Yes ( ) No (  )

Project Engineer: Michael Kohner