alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following are the wholly-owned subsidiaries of Charys Holding Company, Inc.:

1.     Method IQ, Inc., a Georgia corporation.
2.     Personnel Resources of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia corporation.
3.     Viasys Services, Inc., a Florida corporation.
4.     Viasys Network Services, Inc., a Florida corporation.
5.     CCI Telecom, Inc., a Nevada corporation.
6.     Digital Communication Services, Inc., a Kentucky corporation.
7.     Ayin Holding Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
8.     C&B Holding Company, Inc. a Texas corporation.

Viasys Services, Inc. has one wholly-owned subsidiary, VSI Real Estate Holdings,
Inc., a Florida corporation.

CCI Telecom, Inc. has three active wholly-owned subsidiaries, Contemporary
Constructors, Inc., a Texas corporation, Berkshire Wireless, Inc., a
Massachusetts corporation, and Integrated Solutions, Inc., a Texas corporation,
and four inactive wholly-owned subsidiaries, CCI Contemporaneo Internacional, C.
A., a Venezuelan corporation, CCI-Chile S. A., a Chilean corporation, CDR Do
Brazil Ltda, a Brazilian corporation, and Contemporary Constructors
International de Mexico, S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.

Ayin Holding Company, Inc has two wholly-owned subsidiary, LFC, Inc. a Texas
corporation and Ayin Tower Management Services, Inc. a  Delaware corporation.

C&B Holding Company, Inc. has one wholly-owned subsidiary Crochet & Borel
Services, Inc., a Texas corporation.
EXHIBIT 99.14a

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert J. Holtz,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chairman of the Board and  President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.


        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                        ZEROS & ONES, INC.

                                        /s/Robert J. Holtz
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Robert J. Holtz, Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chairman of the Board and President

Dated:  May 27, 2003
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6572]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

National Science Foundation

Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences 
Advisory Committee (66).
    Date/Time: April 7, 2010 8 a.m.-6 p.m., April 8, 2010 8 a.m.-3 
p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science 
Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 
1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning NSF science and education activities within the 
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

Agenda

    Update on current status of Directorate
    Report of MPS Committee of Visitors
    Report of NSF Advisory Subcommittees
    Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate
    Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Activities
    Summary Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed 
above.

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6572 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50441

Conference Calendar

__________________

ROBERT L. HUDGINS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division;

MILINDA BOZARTH, Director,

TDCJ-PPD; SCOTT L. COMSTOCK, Warden,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-95-CV-3

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 18, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Robert L. Hudgins, an inmate of the Lockhart Work

Facility (LWF), has appealed the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 civil rights action for failure to state a claim. He

contends that he was entitled to be paroled after he served 180
No. 95-50441

-2-

days in LWF; and he contends that he has been denied rights to

which he is entitled as a preparolee. 

The district court did not err by dismissing the action,

because Hudgins contends that he is entitled to be released from

confinement. If an inmate "is challenging a parole board's rules

and procedures that affect his release, and resolution would

automatically entitle him to accelerated release, then the

challenge must be pursued by writ of habeas corpus." Orellana v.

Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1995). Furthermore, "because [an

inmate] has no liberty interest in obtaining parole in Texas, he

cannot complain of the constitutionality of procedural devices

attendant to parole decisions" in a § 1983 civil rights action. 

Id. at 32.

Hudgins and appellees Collins and Bozarth question why Wayne

Scott was substituted as an appellee in place of Collins. Rule

25(d), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides that when a public officer is a

party to an action and while it is pending he ceases to hold that

office, "the officer's successor is automatically substituted as

a party."

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs And Border Protection


Accreditation of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial 
laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, 
Intertek USA, Inc., 1114 Seaco Avenue Deer Park, TX 77536, has been 
accredited to test petroleum, petroleum products, organic chemicals and 
vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions 
of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct 
laboratory analyses should request and receive written assurances from 
the entity that it is accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test requested. Alternatively, 
inquiries regarding the specific test this entity is accredited to 
perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b68697b25676a69637a4b6f6378256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d8bbbaa8f6b4b9bab0a998bcb0abf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories: 
http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial 
laboratory became effective on August 11, 2010. The next triennial 
inspection date will be scheduled for August 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Cassata, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, (202) 344-
1060.

    Dated: January 4, 2012.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2012-661 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2111 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Indaziflam. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Indaziflam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INDAZIFLAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 N-[(1R,2S)-2,3-Dihydro-2,6- 

dimethyl-1H-inden-1-yl]-6- 

[(1RS)-(1-fluoroethyl)]-1,3,5- 

triazine-2,4-diamine 

(Indaziflam) (CAS No. 

950782–86–2), whether or 

not mixed with application 

adjuvants (provided for in 

subheading 2933.69.60 or 

3808.93.15) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2111 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Michael J. Green, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Republic Property Trust;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May12, 2006         By:     /s/ Michael J. Green    Name:  Michael J. Green    Title:  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
       
<S>                                      <C>           
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          822     
<SECURITIES>                                      0     
<RECEIVABLES>                             1,362,627     
<ALLOWANCES>                                 19,304     
<INVENTORY>                                 311,424     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,473,331     
<PP&E>                                       77,223     
<DEPRECIATION>                               26,414     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           35,426,137     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       389,403     
<BONDS>                                           0     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0     
<PREFERRED>                                      10     
<COMMON>                                     10,560     
<OTHER-SE>                                        0     
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             20,623,005     
<SALES>                                     510,692     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            510,692     
<CGS>                                       797,667     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             2,040,423     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            394,835     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          443,042     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (1,577,938)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1,800     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (1,579,738)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0     
<CHANGES>                                         0     
<NET-INCOME>                             (1,579,738)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.33     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.33     
                                                        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Fund.com Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory
Webster, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Fund.com Inc. and
will be retained by Fund.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/  Gregory
      WebsterGregory
      WebsterChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)




August
18, 2009
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Joan Dugas Guidry MONTGOMERY.

No. 88-K-0483.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 29, 1988.

In re Montgomery, Joan Dugas Guidry; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR87-0577; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 49698.

Prior report: La.App., 525 So.2d 7.

Denied.
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Gui              Hua              Lan                                                             |   |   |   |
| Name: Gui                Hua Lan                                                                      |   |   |        |
| Title:                 Chief                Executive Officerand                Chairman of the Board |   |   |        |

|                                                |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Qiong                Hua Gao               |   |   |   |
| Name: Qiong                  Hua Gao           |   |   |        |
| Title:  Chief Financial                Officer |   |   |        |

----
#### Billy Ray OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BP-180.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 19, 1987.

Billy Ray Oliver, in pro. per.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from a motion filed pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. No order has been entered by the circuit court. Accordingly, we remand for disposition.

BOOTH, C.J., and MILLS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In re The State of Texas, * Original Mandamus Proceeding

No. 11-17-00322-CR * January 19, 2018

 * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Willson, J., 

 Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

 sitting by assignment) 

This court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and 

concludes that the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, we deny Relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-28314 02-MAY-2011 10:52 AM

SCWC-28314 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

CHUNG MI AHN, Respondent/Claimant/Appellant/Appellee-Appellee,
vs. LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner/Respondent/Appellee/Appellant-Cross-Appellee, and J.P. SCHMIDT, Insurance Commissioner, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Respondent/Appellee/Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CIVIL NO. 05-1-2265) ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI 1 (By: McKenna, J., for the court ) Petitioner/Respondent/Appellee/Appellant-Cross-Appellee Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company’s application for writ of

1 Considered by: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused.certiorari, filed on April 13, 2011, is accepted and will be scheduled for consolidated oral arguments with SCWC-28315, Kim v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and J.P. Schmidt, Insurance Commissioner, Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, May 2, 2011. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Associate Justice
MATSUI, CHUNG & IKEHARA Randall Y.S. Chung James H. Monma, forPetitioner/Respondent/Appellee/AppellantCross-Appellee, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 2 of the Quarterly Report of Global Gate Property Corp. (the Company") on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Gary S. Ohlbaum, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:


(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated: March 28, 2011
 
 By:
/s/ Gary S. OhlbaumGary S. Ohlbaum

Presidient,Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
#### T. Frank SMITH v. The PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE, Louisiana, and the East Baton Rouge Sewerage Commission.

No. 87-C-1267.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 1, 1987

In re Smith, T. Prank; applying for supervisory writs of certiorari or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA86 1685; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 308840.

Prior report: La.App., 509 So.2d 24.

Granted. This case is remanded to the district court for an expedited hearing to entertain evidence on plaintiffs standing to sue; any appeal thereafter to the Court of Appeal is to be expedited.