alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ex-10.2



 





Exhibit
10.2










FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



CLOSING
DATE EXTENDED FOR CASA HERRADURA TRANSACTION




     Louisville,
KY, January 11, 2007 — Brown-Forman Corporation and
Grupo Industrial Herradura, S.A. de C.V. and its subsidiaries (Casa
Herradura), have mutually agreed that the closing date for Brown-Forman’s acquisition of the Mexican
tequila company will be extended to no later than January 18, 2007.



     Brown-Forman
announced on August 28, 2006 that it had reached agreement with
the owners of Casa Herradura to purchase substantially all of their 136-year-old company’s related assets
for $876 million dollars.



     Brown-Forman Corporation is a diversified producer and marketer of fine quality consumer
products, including Jack Daniel’s, Southern Comfort, Finlandia Vodka, Canadian Mist, Fetzer and
Bolla Wines, Korbel California Champagnes, and Hartmann Luggage.



# # #






BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION 850 DIXIE HIGHWAY, LOUISVILLE, KY 40210
E-MAIL: BROWN-FORMAN@B-F.COM WWW.BROWN-FORMAN.COM
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 226 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Havre, 

Montana, as the Merril Lundman Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 13, 2009 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Havre, Montana, as the Merril Lundman Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MERRIL LUNDMAN DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Department of Veterans Af6 fairs outpatient clinic in Havre, Montana, shall after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

8 as the ‘‘Merril Lundman Department of Veterans Affairs 

9 Outpatient Clinic’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 226 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula2 tion, map, document, record, or other paper of the United 

3 States to the outpatient clinic referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be considered to be a reference to the Merril 

5 Lundman Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient 

6 Clinic. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF ELJER INDUSTRIES, INC.



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Percentage             State/Country of
                                                         Ownership               Incorporation
                                                       --------------          -----------------

<S>                                                    <C>                      <C>
Design Plus, Inc. <F1>                                     100%                     Pennsylvania
Eljer FSC Ltd.                                             100%                   Virgin Islands
Eljer Industries Limited                                   100%                   United Kingdom
Eljer Manufacturing Canada, Inc. <F1>                      100%                           Canada
Eljer Manufacturing, Inc.                                  100%                         Delaware
Eljer Plumbingware <F1>                                    100%                         Delaware
Eljer Services Corp.                                       100%                         Delaware
GlasTec, Inc. <F1>                                         100%                         Delaware
Industrias Eljer de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. <F1>              100%                           Mexico
Selkirk Canada U.S.A., Inc.                                100%                         Delaware
Selkirk Europe U.S.A., Inc.                                100%                         Delaware
Selkirk Manufacturing France S.A.R.L.<F2>                99.95%                           France
Selkirk Manufacturing Limited <F1>                         100%                   United Kingdom
Selkirk Schornsteintechnik GmbH <F1>                       100%                          Germany
Selkirk S.R.L.<F1>                                         100%                            Italy
Selkirk UK, U.S.A. No. 1, Inc.                             100%                         Delaware
Selkirk/Dry, Inc. <F1>                                     100%                         Delaware
United States Brass Corporation <F1>                       100%                         Delaware

<FN>
<F1>      Indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Eljer Industries, Inc.
<F2>      99.95% indirectly owned subsidiary of Eljer Industries, Inc.
</FN>
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2111 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2111

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Indaziflam.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Indaziflam.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDAZIFLAM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       N-[(1R,2S)-2,3-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Dihydro-2,6-                                                       31/2011.......
                          dimethyl-1H-inden-
                          1-yl]-6-[(1RS)-(1-
                          fluoroethyl)]-
                          1,3,5-triazine-
                          2,4-diamine
                          (Indaziflam) (CAS
                          No. 950782-86-2),
                          whether or not
                          mixed with
                          application
                          adjuvants
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2933.69.60 or
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1988 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1988

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bamboo vases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain bamboo vases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN BAMBOO VASES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Vases made of       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        strips of bamboo                                                   31/2011.......
                        bonded together
                        and varnished to
                        give the
                        appearance of
                        solid wood
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        4602.11.09)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. N. Monroe Marshall, Appellant, *v.*John N. Moore, as Sheriff of the County of Clinton, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Marshall*v. Moore, 167 App. Div. 479, affirmed.

(Argued January 12, 1916;

decided February 1, 1916.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 26, 1915, which affirmed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of habeas' corpus and remanding the relator to custody. The grounds of appeal are that the indictment attached to the requisition by the governor of Massachusetts is formally defective in that it fails to specify “ where the relator did steal,” “in what state, county, country, or city the alleged offense was committed,” “in what form or manner, or by what means the alleged larceny was committed,” “whether the alleged offense was a felony or misdemeanor,” “of what county the said grand jury or jurors were acting for in the finding of such alleged indictment, or whether the alleged grand jury or jurors were such of the county of Suffolk, Massachusetts, or jurors of some other county of Massachusetts; ” that the indictment does not charge a crime, and that the relator’s constitutional rights, both federal and state, were violated. There was also an objection made by the relator to the admission of typewritten copies of certain laws of Massachusetts at the hearing.

*John E. Judge*for appellant.

*Abraham C. Webber, Joseph C. Pelletier*and *Thomas D. Lavelle*for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Sea-bury and Pound, JJ.; Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., concurs on the sole ground that while proof of the Massachusetts statutes was necessary, it was properly supplied before the Appellate Division and this court.
Document

Exhibit 10.1(a)

Schedule of Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreements of Named Executive Officers dated as of September 30, 2020


						
	Name
	Maximum SERP Benefit Payable at Retirement
	Stephen D. Westhoven, President and Chief Executive Officer	$250,000
	Nancy A. Washington, Senior Vice President and General Counsel	$125,000
	Amy Cradic, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Non-Utility Businesses, Strategy and External Affairs	$125,000
	Patrick J. Migliaccio, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	$125,000
	Amanda E. Mullan, Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer	$125,000
Exhibit 4.1


 


Transfer
of Loan Agreement


(Unofficial
Summary English Translation Solely for Convenience)


 


Party
A: Shandong SNTON Optical Materials Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Shandong SNTON”)


Legal Representative:
Zengyong Wang


 


Party
B: Shandong Shengjia Industrial Park Operation and Management (“Shandong Shengjia”)


Legal Representative:
Yawen Zhang


 


Considering:


 


In
April 2014, Fuwei Films (Shandong) Co., Ltd. (the “Fuwei Shandong”) entered into one Use of Capital
Agreement with Shandong SNTON pursuant to which Fuwei Shandong obtained a loan for a total amount of RMB105.0 million from Shandong
SNTON to pay off certain short-term loans due to Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. The interest shall be calculated at the
benchmark rate, plus an additional 20% of the said benchmark rate, for the loan of the same term announced by the People’s
Bank of China. The interest must be paid quarterly and settled in full at the end of the year. As of December 31, 2014, the
principal of this loan and the interest have not been paid. In March 2015, the Fuwei Shandong entered into a supplemental
agreement with Shandong SNTON pursuant to which the parties agreed that Fuwei Shandong will pay off the principal of this loan
plus interest upon availability of new loans from banks or other financial institutions. To date, Fuwei Shandong paid back part
of the loan.


 


Shandong SNTON and Shandong Shengjia have
agreed on terms and conditions set forth as below:


 


		1.	Shandong SNTON transferred the remaining principal of this loan together with the related interest
to Shandong Shengjia.



 


		2.	The consideration of this transfer is 87.02 million and payment has been made on June 4, 2020.



 


Any dispute arising from this Agreement
shall be settled through arbitration. If no agreement can be reached through arbitration, both parties shall have the right to
bring an action against the other party with the court where the agreement is signed.


 


This agreement is in duplicates and each
party holds one copy.


 


Shandong SNTON Optical Materials Technology
Co., Ltd. (chop)


 


Shandong
Shengjia Industrial Park Operation and Management (chop)


 


Date:
June 10, 2020.
#### Raymond WYNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 10, 1987.

Raymond Wynn, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed. We believe the trial court erroneously dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Although the appellant has another appeal pending in this court, it involves a separate case and does not deprive the trial court of jurisdiction in this case.

HERSEY, C.J., and ANSTEAD and STONE, JJ., concur.
50207.

#### ELAM v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA.

Stolz, Judge.

" 'As a general rule, a servant in going to and from his work in an automobile acts only for his own purposes and not for those of his employer, and consequently the employer is not to be held to be liable for an injury occasioned while the servant is en route to or from his work. 5 Blashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, 196, § 3041. In this connection see *Elrod v. Anchor Duck Mills,*50 Ga. App. 531, 533 (179 SE 188); *U. S. Casualty Co. v. Scott,*51 Ga. App. 115 (179 SE 640); *Welsh v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,*61 Ga. App. 635 (7 SE2d 85).’ *Stenger v. Mitchell,*70 Ga. App. 563, 566 (28 SE2d 885). See also *Chattanooga Publishing Co. v. Fulton,*215 Ga. 880 (114 SE2d 138); *Ingram v. Life Ins. Co. of Virginia,*111 Ga. App. 599 (142 SE2d 334).” *Stewart v. Roberts,*132 Ga. App. 700, 701 (209 SE2d 119).

In the present action of the above nature, the trial judge did not err in granting summary judgment to the defendant employer where the only showing contended to prove that the employee, driving his own automobile home from work, was acting within the scope of his employment, was that he was taking some of his employer’s papers and work home with him to work on them at home, as he had done for the past several nights, *170at the time of the collision. Even if the employee be considered "at work” when he reached his home where he worked on his employer’s business, at most he was still only "en route to or from his work” at the time of the collision under the above authorities, there being no showing that he was in continuous employment, as a traveling salesman. See *Welsh v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,*61 Ga. App. 635, 636, supra.

Submitted February 10, 1975

Decided March 5, 1975.

*E. Graydon Shuford,*for appellant.

*Long, Weinberg, Ansley & Wheeler, John E. Talmadge,*for appellee.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 12, 2011, Johnson Matthey, Inc., Pharmaceuticals Materials, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (2010)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIThebaine (9333)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale in bulk to its customers. The Thebaine (9333) will also be used to manufacture other controlled substances in bulk which will also be for sale in bulk to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than March 19, 2012. Dated: January 6, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-653 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### STATE ex rel. Chris HINGLE v. COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT.

No. 88-KH-2345.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Hingle, (Chris; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 301-102; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KW-1492.

Denied.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/10

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 10 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2




              AMERICAN EXPRESS RECEIVABLES FINANCING CORPORATION II

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     American  Express   Receivables   Financing   Corporation  II,  a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"),  and each of the undersigned officers and directors
of the Company, hereby constitute and appoint Jay B. Stevelman,  John D. Koslow,
Leslie R.  Scharfstein and Stephen P. Norman,  jointly and severally,  with full
power of substitution  and revocation,  their true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact
and agents,  for them and on their behalf and in their respective names,  places
and  steads,  in any and all  capacities,  to  sign,  execute  and  affix  their
respective seal thereto and file any of the documents referred to below relating
to the American  Express Credit  Account  Master Trust;  all filings and reports
required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including Current Reports on
Form 8-K and Annual Reports on Form 10-K,  including any amendments  thereto, on
behalf  of the  Company,  with any  regulatory  authority,  granting  unto  said
attorneys, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises
in order to  effectuate  the same as fully to all intents  and  purposes as they
might or could do if personally  present,  hereby  ratifying and  confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney may be executed in counterparts.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  American Express Receivables  Financing Corporation II
has caused this Power of  Attorney  to be executed in its name by its  President
and attested by its Secretary,  and the undersigned  officers and directors have
hereunto set their hand as of the 28th day of March, 2002.

                                           AMERICAN EXPRESS RECEIVABLES
                                           FINANCING CORPORATION II

                                           By: /s/ Leslie R. Scharfstein
                                              --------------------------
                                              Leslie R. Scharfstein
                                              President



ATTEST:

/s/ Michael Kuchs
-------------------------------------
Michael Kuchs
Secretary



<PAGE>




/s/ Leslie R. Scharfstein
-------------------------------------
Leslie R. Scharfstein
President
(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ John D. Koslow
-------------------------------------
John D. Koslow
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Finance Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)



/s/ Donald J. Puglisi
-------------------------------------
Donald J. Puglisi
Director



/s/ Jay B. Stevelman
-------------------------------------
Jay B. Stevelman
Director
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2257 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Deltamethrin. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Deltamethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.49 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1
  VIA HAND DELIVERY
 
 Re:      Termination of Employment and Release of Claims
   1. Severance .
 2. Benefits .
 3. Consideration .




---



##### 



4. Complete Release .
  5. Bank Property .




---



##### 



6. Mutual Non-Disparagement, Confidentiality and Cooperation .
    7. Non-Admission .
 8. Termination and Other Items .




---



##### 



9. Records .
 10. No Future Lawsuits .
 11. Continuation of Obligations Under Any Other Agreement You Have With the Bank .
 12. No Other Payments or Benefits .
 13. Time to Consider this Letter Agreement .
 14. Consultation with Attorney; Right to Revoke




---



##### 



15. No Other Promises .
 16. Execution of Letter Agreement .
 17. No Modification .
 18. Enforcement .
 April 23, 2008 The Bank encourages you to consult with an attorney before signing this Letter
Agreement.
 BANK OF BIRMINGHAMBy:
    /s/ William AikensWilliam AikensIts:       Chairman




---



##### 



I further acknowledge that Bank of Birmingham has advised me to consult an
attorney before signing this Letter Agreement.
 /s/ RICHARD MILLERRICHARD MILLERDated: 4/2/08, 2008