alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Armand LABRANCH.

No. 89-K-0849.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re State of Louisiana; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or re*1212view; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88KA-1638; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “H”, No. 320-766.

Prior report: La.App., 541 So.2d 266.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and MARCUS and COLE, JJ., would grant the writ.

l
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 144

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Whereas November 17, 2000, is the 200th anniversary of the

first meeting of Congress in Washington, DC;

Whereas Congress, having previously convened at the Federal

Hall in New York City and at the Congress Hall in

Philadelphia, has met in the United States Capitol Building since November 17, 1800;

Whereas President John Adams, on November 22, 1800, addressed a joint session of Congress in Washington, DC,

for the first time, stating, ‘‘I congratulate the people of

the United States on the assembling of Congress at the

permanent seat of their Government; and I congratulate

you, gentlemen, on the prospect of a residence not to be

changed.’’;

Whereas, on December 12, 1900, Congress convened a joint

meeting to observe the centennial of its residence in

Washington, DC;

Whereas since its first meeting in Washington, DC, on November 17, 1800, Congress has continued to cultivate

and build upon a heritage of respect for individual liberty, representative government, and the attainment of

equal and inalienable rights, all of which are symbolized

in the physical structure of the United States Capitol

Building; and
2

SCON 144 ES

Whereas it is appropriate for Congress, as the first branch

of the government under the Constitution, to commemorate the 200th anniversary of the first meeting of Congress in Washington, DC, in order to focus public attention on its present duties and responsibilities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives

2 concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that—

3 (1) November 17, 2000, be designated as a day of

4 national observance for the 200th anniversary of the first

5 meeting of Congress in Washington, DC; and

6 (2) the people of the United States be urged and in7 vited to observe such date by celebrating and examining

8 the legislative process by which members of Congress con9 vene and air differences, learn from one another, subordi10 nate parochial interests, compromise, and work towards

11 achieving a constructive consensus for the good of the peo12 ple of the United States.

Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 144

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 200th aniversary of the first

meeting of Congress in Washington, DC.
#### Emmett Eugene CROCKETT, Jr. v. Sherry Manchester CROCKETT.

No. 87-CC-0742.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 9, 1987.

In re Crockett, Emmett Eugene Jr.; applying for supervisory or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 87-0225; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 339-454.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2398 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2398

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 
                         1,8-bis(phenylthio)-.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 9,10-Anthracenedione, 
                         1,8-bis(phenylthio)-.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 9,10-ANTHRACENEDIONE,
              1,8-BIS(PHENYLTHIO)-.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 9,10-Anthracenedione, 1,8-
bis(phenylthio)-) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 57 (Friday, March 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 17098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6932]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Availability of Funds and Solicitation for Grant 
Applications for Serving Adult and Youth Ex-Offenders Through 
Strategies Targeted to Characteristics Common to Female Ex-Offenders

Funding Opportunity Number: SGA/DFA PY-11-12

SUMMARY: Through this notice, the Department of Labor's Employment and 
Training Administration (ETA), announces the availability of 
approximately $12 million in grant funds authorized by the Workforce 
Investment Act (WIA) to award approximately eight grants to serve adult 
and youth ex-offenders pre- and post-release. Services to be funded 
will be targeted to female ex-offenders, but must also be open to 
eligible male ex-offenders. Applicants may submit only one proposal for 
up to $1.5 million, with the amount requested depending on the number 
of participants to be served. These grants will be selected through a 
competitive process open to any non-profit organization with IRS 
501(c)(3) status, unit of state or local government, or any Indian and 
Native American entity eligible for grants under WIA Section 166. These 
grants will cover a 30-month period of performance that includes up to 
six months of planning and a minimum of 24 months of operations. The 24 
month period for operations must include time to allow each participant 
to complete the program and have between 3-4 months of follow-up. Thus, 
the last cohort of participants must complete program services 3 to 4 
months before the end of the grant. Grantees may provide follow-up 
services to some participants while providing direct services to 
others.
    The complete SGA and any subsequent SGA amendments, in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications is May 4, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mamie Williams, Grants Management 
Specialist, Division of Federal Assistance, at (202) 693-3341.

    The Grant Officer for this SGA is Latifa Jeter.
    Signed March 19, 2012 in Washington, D.C.
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-6932 Filed 3-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
#### Kevin ANDERSON, et al. v. ST. BERNARD PARISH, et al (two cases).

No. 89-C-1264.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Anderson, Kevin; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Nos. 88CA-2222, 89CA-0214; Parish of St. Bernard, 34th Judicial District Court, Div. “C", No. 50-863.

Prior report: La.App., 543 So.2d 537. Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2466 

To reduce temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 

assembled as floral stems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as floral stems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS 

4 ASSEMBLED AS FLORAL STEMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as floral stems (provided for in 

subheading 6702.90.35) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2466 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2272 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2272

            To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Methoprene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Methoprene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. S-METHOPRENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Isopropyl (2E,4E)-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (7S)-11-methoxy-                                                   31/2011.......
                          3,7,11-
                          trimethyldodeca-
                          2,4-dienoate (CAS
                          No. 65733-16-6)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2918.99.5000)....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                        44
<INVENTORY>                                      1,306
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,064
<PP&E>                                           2,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                     696
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,025
<BONDS>                                          1,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51 
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,220
<SALES>                                          2,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,713
<CGS>                                            1,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,496
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    147
<INCOME-TAX>                                        72
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 75
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        75
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Con. Res. 132 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.Con.Res.132
                                         Agreed to July 27, 2000        

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives concurring), 
That, in consonance with section 132(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946, when the Senate recesses or adjourns at the 
close of business on Thursday, July 27, 2000, Friday, July 28, 2000, or 
on Saturday, July 29, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this 
concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand 
recessed or adjourned until noon on Tuesday, September 5, 2000, or 
until noon on Wednesday, September 6, 2000, or until such time on 
either day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee 
in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until noon on the second day 
after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 2 of this 
concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; and that when the House 
adjourns on the legislative day of Thursday, July 27, 2000, or Friday, 
July 28, 2000, on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent 
resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it stand adjourned 
until 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, September 6, 2000, or until noon on the 
second day after Members are notified to reassemble pursuant to section 
2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first.
    Sec. 2. The Majority Leader of the Senate and the Speaker of the 
House, acting jointly after consultation with the Minority Leader of 
the Senate and the Minority Leader of the House, shall notify the 
Members of the Senate and House, respectively, to reassemble whenever, 
in their opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
  Attest:

                                               Secretary of the Senate.

  Attest:

                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.
```
#### Marianne D. PIRINO, Appellant, v. Raymond J. PIRINO, Appellee.

No. 87-1417.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 2, 1988.

George E. Adams of Adams, Hill, Ful-ford & Morgan, Orlando, for appellant.

Andrea L. Cain of Cain & Ewald, P.A., Orlando, for appellee.

ORFINGER, Judge.

In this appeal from a judgment of dissolution of marriage, the former wife raises several issues, only one of which has merit, viz, that the amount of permanent alimony awarded was too low under the circumstances of this case. In dissolving the 28 year marriage, the trial court awarded the sum of $500 per month as permanent alimony to the 46 year old wife, who had not been employed for many years, finding that the wife could be employed and receive at least minimum wage.

The wife had worked part time early in the marriage, while raising three children, now grown, to help put the husband through dental school and then worked part of the time in the husband’s dental office, without pay. During the year prior to the divorce, the husband earned approximately $112,000.1

Under the circumstances of this case we consider the award of permanent alimony to be insufficient and an abuse of discretion. Even if the wife were fully employed at the minimum wage, which the trial court considered she could earn, or at the rate of $7.00 per hour, which the husband’s expert testified the wife could expect to earn to begin with, there would be a great disparity in the parties' earnings. Even assuming the wife could gross approximately $14,500 per year (earning $7.00 per hour) and received permanent alimony of $6,000 per year, the husband’s income would still be almost four times the wife’s income. There is no practical way the wife could support herself on that income in a manner commensurate with the standard of living *1029which the parties enjoyed during the marriage, where the mortgage payments, taxes and insurance on the marital home alone are almost $1,200 per month. We reject the husband’s argument that the assets the wife received in the distribution scheme make up for the great difference in income. Both parties shared in the equitable distribution of the assets, but even with the assets distributed to the wife, her economic situation is still so grossly inferior to that of the husband as to clearly demonstrate that the wife was shortchanged. *See Canakaris v. Canakaris,*382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

We remand the case to the trial court with directions to reconsider the award of permanent periodic alimony and to award such sum as is in keeping with the wife’s needs and the husband’s superior ability to pay and the standard of living of the parties. In all other respects the final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

1

. The husband testified that this was an unusual year, involving a great amount of overtime. Nevertheless, his earnings for the three year period prior to that one averaged in excess of $74,000 per year.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JASON SHINN

*Mary H.*Lesser, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.

*Francis T. Mandanici,*assistant public defender, in opposition.

Decided March 25, 1998

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 401 (AC 15928), is denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

I, Dana Waldman certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of Voyant International Corporation., a Nevada corporation;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

April 9, 2009



| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Dana Waldman       
| |     |                        
| |     | Dana Waldman           
| |     | Chief Executive Officer