alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 173 (Monday, September 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 53175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21400]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Thursday, September 11, 2014.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters, and 
Examinations. In the event that the times, dates, or locations of this 
or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along 
with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher J. Kirkpatrick, 202-
418-5964.

Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
 Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014-21400 Filed 9-4-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
USAA Federal Savings 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00306-CV

Cynthia L. BARKMAN and Charles N. Barkman,

Appellants

v.

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01936

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due on August 5, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On August 

24, 2015, after neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time was timely filed, we ordered 

Appellants to show cause in writing by September 3, 2015, why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), (c). On September 4, 2015, 

Appellants filed a brief.

Appellants’ brief does not contain any citations to the record in either the statement of 

facts or argument sections. Contra id. R. 38.1(g) (“The statement [of facts] must be supported 

by record references.”); id. R. 38.1(i) (“The brief must contain a clear and concise argument for 

the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.”). Further, 

although it references certain documents as appendices, the brief contains no appendix. Contra 

id. R. 38.1(k). 

While substantial compliance with Rule 38 may be sufficient, this court may order a 

party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates Rule 38. See id. R. 38.9(a). 

We conclude that the formal defects described above constitute flagrant violations of Rule 38. 

Therefore, we STRIKE Appellants’ brief and ORDER Appellants Charles Barkman and 

Cynthia L. Barkman to file an amended brief within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. The 

amended brief must correct the violations listed above and fully comply with the applicable 

rules. See, e.g., id. R. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1. 
If the amended brief does not comply with this order, we “may strike the brief, prohibit 

[Appellants] from filing another, and proceed as if [Appellants] had failed to file a brief.” See id.

R. 38.9(a); see also id. R. 38.8(a) (authorizing this court to dismiss an appeal if an appellant fails 

to timely file a brief). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 961 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 961

  To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve 
                   shared appreciation arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 5, 1999

Mr. Burns (for himself, Mr. Craig, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Kerrey, 
 and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
 and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve 
                   shared appreciation arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHARED APPRECIATION ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 353(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) 
and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Terms.--A shared appreciation agreement entered into 
        by a borrower under this subsection shall--
                    ``(A) have a term not to exceed 10 years;
                    ``(B) provide for recapture based on the difference 
                between--
                            ``(i) the appraised value of the real 
                        security property at the time of restructuring; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) that value at the time of recapture, 
                        except that that value shall not include the 
                        value of any capital improvements made to the 
                        real security property by the borrower; and
                    ``(C) be based on appraisals that are conducted by 
                persons with a principal place of business that is 
                located in the State containing the real property.''.
    (b) Application.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to a shared appreciation arrangement entered into under section 353(e) 
of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2001(e)) 
that is in effect on or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2258 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2258

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetramethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Tetramethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TETRAMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.34 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Nicholas J. DeIuliis, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CNX Gas Corporation;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange of Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others with in those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 2, 2006



/s/ Nicholas J. DeIuliisNicholas J. DeIuliisPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Westcott Products Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Annual
Report"), we, Wayne Bassham, President and Kent Faulkner, Secretary of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Dated: 12/26/2005                         /s/Wayne Bassham
      -----------                         -------------------------
                                          Wayne Bassham
                                          President and Director


Dated: 12/28/2005                         /s/Kent Faulkner
      -----------                         -------------------------
                                          Kent Faulkner
                                          Secretary and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2303 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2303

  To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Trimethylolpropane 
                              Copolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Trimethylolpropane 
                              Copolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPROLACTONE-TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE COPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Caprolactone-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Trimethylolpropan                                                  31/2011.......
                        e copolymers (CAS
                        37625-56-2)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2




SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION




The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on From 10-K of Israel
Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended April
30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of the
Registrant.




Dated:
      June 14, 2010
                
                /s/
      J. Patrick McMahonJ.
      Patrick McMahonChief
      Financial Officer
August 9, 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF C .Y.C., A CHILD
NO. 14

- 11

- 00341

- CV V.

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed January 27, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order t h e judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.
We further orde r this decision certified below for observance.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAREN MARTOYAN; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-70227

Agency Nos. A077-849-717

 A077-849-718

 A077-849-719

 A077-849-720

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Karen Martoyan and his family, natives and citizens of Armenia, petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our

FILED

SEP 24 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-70227

jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence,

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 (1992), and we dismiss in part and

deny in part the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that petitioners

failed to establish extraordinary circumstances excusing the untimely filed asylum

application because it is based on disputed facts. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); cf.

Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam).

Martoyan omitted additional incidents of harm, as well as the identity of his

attackers from his asylum application statement. See Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959,

962 (9th Cir. 2004). He also testified inconsistently with documentary evidence

regarding where he was hospitalized in 1996. See Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938

(9th Cir. 2000) (inconsistencies between testimony and documentary evidence

support an adverse credibility finding). Because the agency reasonably found that

Martoyan’s explanations for the discrepancies were unconvincing, substantial

evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination. See Wang v.

INS, 352 F.3d 1250, 1256-57 (9th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, in the absence of

credible testimony, Martoyan’s withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v.

Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003). 
3 07-70227

Martoyan’s CAT claim also fails because it is based on the same evidence

the agency found not credible, and he does not point to any evidence in the record

that would compel a finding it is more likely than not he would be tortured if he

returned to Armenia. See id. at 1156-57. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge
that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November 12,
      2009
            
            /s/
      Craign HodgkinsCraig
      Hodgkins, President and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)
## ZUCKER T SCOUTT & RASENBERGER, L.L.P .

ATTORNEY S A T LA W 88 8 Seventeent

hStreet , NW , Washington , D C 2()0(>6-330

9 Telephon e [202

] 298-866 0 Fa x [202 | 342-068 3 www . zsrl aw .com DAVI D M . ENDERSBE E DIREC T DIA L (202 ) 97.V793S dmender5bee@zsrliw.coi n Marc h14,201 1 B Y HAN D DELIVER Y Mr . Georg e Wellingto n Foreig n Ai r

Carrie r Licensin g Divisio n (X-45 ) U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n ^ *.^oc: ' 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . " Washington , D C 2059 0 5

Re : Applicatio n of

CA I Secon dS.p.A . (Docke t OST-2009-0Q23 ) r [ i-^-^fr i O

Dea r Mr . Wellington : O n Marc h10 , 2011 , CAI Secon dS.p.A . ("CA I Second" ) file da n applicatio n fo

r a n exemptio n i n th e abov e -reference ddockets . CA I Firs t ha s polle dal l intereste dpartie s an d there wer e n o objection s t o it s application . CAI Secon drespectfull y request s that th e Departmen t

promptl y gran t

it s application .

Davi dM . Endersbe e
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Earl BREAUX, Jr.

No. 87-KH-1688.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 15, 1987.

In re Breaux, Earl Jr.; applying for writ of habeas corpus and remedial writ; Parish of Vermilion, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “K”.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the district court for prompt consideration.
[491o-13-PJ DEPARBIE"T OF TRANSPORTATION Federal A\-iation Administration ~~ '11. 

# 1m ""~7'\."1Oit 

## 1'/.1...-.. 14CFR Part .~() 

# 01

# &3 (Docket No. F \.-\-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 

### 2009-NM~253-ADI Amendment 

# .,.j0.~:



# j, 201

# oJJ~

0 

# '-f RlN 2120-:\AI\4 ~'!

## .

## / 

# . b, h/?.:- .•.• I j l j I) 

## ~" 

## b 111/1->1,; I 1 f., j-{. Ainvorthines:, Directives; Airbus Model A380-800 Series Airplanes TU! AGEi\CY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT).
ed 

### AtJA,

# -::r 

# ..• ~:.- c- 

# .e<--
...

# ,. 7

# f-.---v •



# • * * 

## • 

# • • • Thi" c(' ldition, ifnot detected and corrected, could lead to a ON failure which' ould affect the structural integrity oftha! wing area. 1ncas~ 

### 'If failure of the master bracket, ilie sub-master bracket would be able to 

### ;.llstain limit loads but not 

### ultimatb loads. 

# WI, ~" This AD rcyui: ~'S

actions tha; are intended to address the unsafe condition described in 

### lJ condltion (In ,u~aviation product. The MeAl descnbes the unsafe condition asA cruel h,15been found on Ihe Droop Nole (ON) 

### 1 master sides lay bracket on the Ilbo<lrd leading edge afan Airbus A380 flight test aeroplane. originated hy•

.1:1 aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe above. This All results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) AcnON: Fin.d rule; request forcomments. Slll\-ff';-'lARY: .Vc.lre adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products Ii

!he MeAl.

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6"89) OFFICIALFILE COP 

## *u.s. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFfiCE: \895 . 769-211[49Ill-13-PI DEPARTi\IF: '\'T OF TR.;\]'l$PORT ATION Fedenl A,-ial\on Administrntion
IDocket No. F \A~201O-**'***; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-253-AD)
RIN 2120-:\1\1>4 Airwortbincs.-: Directives; Airbus Model A380-800 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Fc·lcral Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). 

# ." ;;/ ,-, ft.;" . ~ 

# -..-.- j ii. j ~

ACTION: Fin.llrule; request forcomments. SUMfvlARY: Nc are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis ed



# -~~ above. This All results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

# -- originated by ""\aviation authority of another country to identify and correct anunsafe :>On condition on OIl' aviation product. The MeAl describes tlleunsafe condition as: A

# c;,,' has bee" fo""d on the Droop NOJ. (ON) I master sidestay bcacket on Ihc i lhoard leading edge ofan Airbus f.380 flight tcst aeroplane. In case df failure afthe master bracket, the sub-master bracket would be abk to :-ustainlimit loads but not ultimat~ loads. This cr ldilion, ifnot detected and corrected, could lead 10a ON failure which '"auld affect the structural 

### integrity of that wing area . 

### ""'''''''"'''''''"



## ""



# --

• • 

## • 

# • • 

# • • 

# -....-,- ." This AD rC'4ui;~sactions thai are intended to address the unsafe condition described i the MeAl.

FAAForm 1360·14.1 (6·89) OFFICIAL FILE COPY