alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2225 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Cyclopropylaminonicotinic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2- 

Cyclopropylaminonicotinic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2-CYCLOPROPYLAMINONICOTINIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘9902.01.00 2-Cyclopropylaminonicotinic acid (2- 

CAN) (CAS No. 639807–18–4) (provided for in subheading 2933.39.61) Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 

’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2225 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32 - A
                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, the  undersigned  officer of Tenet  Information
Services,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that the Company's  Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB  for the year ended June 30,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 30, 2004

/s/ Marty Williams
-----------------------------------
Marty Williams
Chief Executive Officer, President

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-40079

Summary Calendar

PREMIER FINANCIAL SERVICES - TEXAS L. P.,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

VERSUS

WAYNE A. LUNDQUIST, JR., ET AL.,

Defendants,

WAYNE A. LUNDQUIST, JR.,

Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-94-CV-545)

November 6, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

On July 26, 1996, this Court stayed further consideration of

this appeal pending an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court
2

for the Southern District of Texas lifting the automatic stay of

that court in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding No. 96-22457-C11 filed by appellant Wayne A. Lundquist, Jr. Such automatic stay

has now been lifted by the bankruptcy court and we proceed with

consideration of this appeal.

Premier Financial Services - Texas L.P. (“Premier”) sued Wayne

A. Lundquist, Jr. (“Lundquist”) and others on a written guaranty

agreement executed by Lundquist, guaranteeing the payment of a

promissory note dated October 24, 1983, executed by Nueces

Development Company payable to Victoria Savings Association in the

original principal sum of $793,000 one year after date. The

maturity date of this note was ultimately extended by various

renewal and extension agreements until September 19, 1987. The

Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”) was appointed conservator of

Victoria Savings Association on June 29, 1989. In December 1990,

after making demand on the maker and Lundquist for payment of this

note, the RTC proceeded to foreclose upon the secured property and

sold the secured property at public auction for the sum of

$161,028, which was credited against the note. In January 1994,

the RTC as receiver for Victoria Savings Association FSA.

transferred the note and guaranty, along with all right, title and

interest therein, to Premier. On December 16, 1994, Premier

brought this suit upon his guaranty against Lundquist seeking to

recover the remaining amounts due and owing on the note. In

September 1995, Premier moved for a summary judgment on its claims
3

against defendant Lundquist and on Lundquist’s counterclaim against

Premier. On December 6, 1995, the district court granted Premier’s

motion for a summary judgment and by a corrected final judgment

entered under date of December 29, 1995, granted recovery in the

amount of $606,345.08 against Lundquist.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the record itself; and for the reasons stated

by the district court in its order granting motion for summary

judgment entered under date of December 6, 1995, we affirm the

final judgment entered under date of December 29, 1995.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          37,624
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               150,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    375,610
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,763,355
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,730,745
<LOANS>                                        109,392
<ALLOWANCE>                                        100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,553,080
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,552,407
<SHORT-TERM>                                   820,034
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,583
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,218
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,553,080
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,765
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              102,837
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               106,602
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              41,046
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,829
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           35,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                135,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,719
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,719
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,268
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    1.95
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               100
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California
Housing Tax Credits,  L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
June 24, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

          - [A-583-841]

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dustin Ross, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0747.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On March 1, 2012, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published its opportunity to request administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyvinyl alcohol from Taiwan.                     *See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review,*77 FR 12559 (March 1, 2012). Subsequent to this publication, we identified an inadvertent error. Specifically, the period of review was incorrect. The correct period of review is 09/13/2010-02/29/2012 rather than 09/13/2011-02/29/2012. This notice serves as a correction.                

Dated: March 2, 2012.

Christian Marsh,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations.

[FR Doc. 2012-5793 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PURE SA LOZOYA VA ZQUEZ, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73321 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 033- 381 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry15, 2013 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , B E A , an dN G U Y E N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P ures a L ozoya V az qu ez , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng her app l i cat i on s f or w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED JAN 16 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 73321 2 u n d er8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r ev iew fo r ab u se o f d iscr etio n th e a g en cy ’s d e te rm in a tio n th a t an a lie n w a s c o n v ic te do f ap a rtic u lar lys e r io u s c r im e . A rbi d v. H older , 700 F . 3d 379, 383 ( 9th C i r . 2012) . W e r e vi e w f ors ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e the a g e n c y ’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s . W

akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e ag en cy d i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n w h en i td et erm i n edth atL o zo ya V a z que z ’ s c onvi c t i on i s apa rt i c ul a r l ys e r i ous c r i m e tha tr e nde r s he ri ne l i gi bl e f or w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. See 8 U . S . C . § 1 23 1(b)(3)(B)(i i ); Mi gu el-Mi gu el v. G on zales , 50 0 F . 3d 94 1, 94 6-49 (9th C i r. 20 07 ) ( drug tra ff i cki ng fe l on i es pres um pt i vel y c on st i tut e part i cul ar l y s er i ou s c ri m es ). S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce sup p o rt s th e ag en cy’ s d et erm i n at i o n th atL o zo ya V a z q u e z f

a ile dto e s tab lis h it is m o r e lik e lyth a n n o t th a t s h e w o u ldb e to rtu r e dif s h e r e tu rn e dto M e x ic o . See W a kka ry , 558 F . 3d a t1067- 68. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of The Amacore
Group, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge,
that:





The
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form
10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirement of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in
the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      March 31, 2010
            /s/Jay Shafer
              Jay
      Shafer
              Chief
      Executive OfficerDated:
      March 31, 2010
            /s/ Scott
      Smith
              Scott
      Smith
              Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**





I,
      James
      W. Klingler, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of North
      American Scientific, Inc.;





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date:
      February 28, 2006


/s/ JAMES
              W.
              KLINGLERJames
              W.
              Klingler
              *Senior
                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NATHAN ROI WILCOX,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 433 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                              114,971
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                       314,139
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                         283,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    800,124
<PP&E>                              626,720
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,322,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               996,232
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 5,245
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,322,253
<SALES>                           1,264,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                               830,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,283,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    1,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (101,987)
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (66,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                      (35,739)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     270,435
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        168,448
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0



</TABLE>
* This disposition is not appropriate fo r publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable G. Murray Snow, United St ates District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. FELIPE FELIX-CARRAZCO, Defendant - Appellant. No. 07-30317 D.C. No. CV-04-064-BLW MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding Submitted March 9, 2010 Seattle, Washington Before: FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SNOW, District Judge. ** Felipe Felix-Carrazco (“Felix”) contends that the district court erred when it denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition without granting an evidentiary hearing on his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel attrial. We have juri sdiction pursuant to 28 

# FILED
APR 14 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm. The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the record conclusively shows that Felix is not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective assistance. See United States v. Howard , 381 F.3d 873, 877 (9th Cir. 2004) ; United States v. Rodrigues , 347 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir. 2003). Felix fails to explain how he was prejudiced by his attorney’s alleged errors. See United States v. Mejia-Mesa , 153 F.3d 925, 931 (9th Cir. 1998). Although he alleges that hi s attorney did not conduct a proper investigation and that he was not ad equately prepared for trial, Felix fails to explain how counsel was ill-prepared or w hy the alleged lack of preparation somehow affected the outcome in this case. See Villafuerte v. Stewart , 111 F.3d 616, 632 (9th Cir. 1997) (holding that petitioner’s ineff ective assistance of counsel claim failed because he did not explain what his atto rney “would have found had he investigated further” and failed to expl ain “what lengthier preparation would have accomplished”). We also reject Felix’s argument that the attorneys who prepared his § 2255 petition were ineffective because they failed to comply with the District of Idaho’s Local Rules. A federal habeas petitioner has “no right to counsel on his collateral postconviction 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition.” United States v. Angelone , 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir. 1990) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley , 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)). Accordingly, Felix “cannot raise an ineff ectiveness of counsel claim” based on his3 attorneys’ alleged misconduct during the § 2255 proceedings. Id. AFFIRMED.
```
       EXHIBIT 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002In connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin P. Regan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: June 22, 2009/s/ Kevin P. ReganChief Financial Officer      
```
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. SaraWilliams, Treasurer and Principal
Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.





Date:
September 29, 2008








/s/ Sara
Williams


Sara
Williams


Treasurer
(principal financial officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.