alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran Executive Order 12957

On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government of Iran. On May 6, 1995, the President issued Executive Order 12959, imposing more comprehensive sanctions to further respond to this threat; on August 19, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 13059, consolidating and clarifying the previous orders; and I issued Executive Order 13553 of September 28, 2010, Executive Order 13574 of May 23, 2011, Executive Order 13590 of November 20, 2011, and Executive Order 13599 of February 5, 2012, to take additional steps pursuant to this national emergency.

                        Because the actions and policies of the Government of Iran continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency declared on March 15, 1995, must continue in effect beyond March 15, 2012. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran. Because the emergency declared by Executive Order 12957 constitutes an emergency separate from that declared on November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, this renewal is distinct from the emergency renewal of November 2011. This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2012-6426

Billing code 3295-F2-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned principal executive officer of Dearborn Capital
Management, L.L.C., the general partner (the “General Partner”) of Grant Park
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (“Grant Park”), and principal financial officer
of the General Partner hereby certifies that:
  (1)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Grant Park for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and
  (2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Grant Park.
  Date:           February 22,
2010
  /s/David M.
      KavanaghDavid
      M. KavanaghPresident(Principal Executive Officer)Dearborn
      Capital Management, L.L.C.General
      Partner
  /s/Maureen
      O’RourkeMaureen O’RourkeChief Financial OfficerDearborn
      Capital Management, L.L.C.General
      Partner
  This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Grant Park for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2207

           To suspend temporarily the duty on chlorobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on chlorobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLOROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Chlorobenzene (CAS  2.90%        No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          No. 108-90-7)                                                      31/2011.......
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2903.61.10)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-97538 and 333-23635)  pertaining to the Accom, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option/Stock  Issuance Plan, the Accom,  Inc.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and
the Accom,  Inc.  1997  Non-Executive  Stock  Option Plan of our  reports  dated
October 29, 1997, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and the
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Accom, Inc.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
December 23,1997
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 3 (Thursday, January 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-64]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, January 11, 2012; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 3, 2012.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-64 Filed 1-3-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2214 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain programmable dual function 

coffee makers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain programmable 

dual function coffee makers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PROGRAMMABLE DUAL FUNCTION 

4 COFFEE MAKERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2214 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Programmable dual function 

coffee makers, each with a 

carafe capacity of 1.475 liters 

or more but not over 1.77 liters and a blade grinder that 

dispenses ground beans directly into a brew basket 

(provided for in subheading 

8516.71.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timothy Arazil CLEVELAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4820.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 2003.

Decided June 13, 2003.

Benjamin T. Stepp, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Timothy A. Cleveland appeals his convictions and 154-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty pleas to bank robbery (three counts), obstructing interstate commerce (one count), and brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence (one count), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c), 1951, 2113(a) (2000). In his appeal, filed pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Cleveland claims to have found no non-frivolous grounds for appeal, but challenges the district court’s acceptance of Cleveland’s guilty plea and calculation of his sentence. Cleveland has been advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so.

Neither of the claims presented by counsel were preserved before the district court. Accordingly, they are reviewed for plain error. *See United States v. Martinez,*277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 200, 154 L.Ed.2d 169 (2002); *United States v. Ford,*88 F.3d 1350, 1355 (4th Cir.1996). Cleveland first assigns error to the district court’s acceptance of his guilty pleas. We have reviewed the transcript of the hearing conducted before the district court and are satisfied that Cleveland was afforded the protections of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, as well as the Due Process Clause. Accordingly, this claim merits no relief.

Cleveland next claims that the district court erred in calculating his sentence. We have likewise reviewed the district court’s application of the sentencing guidelines and find no plain error. Cleveland’s sentence was the minimum in the applicable guidelines range, and there was no error in the determination of that range. Moreover, the sentence did not exceed the maximum applicable under the relevant statutes. Accordingly, we deny relief on this claim as well.

Finding no meritorious issues upon our review of the record pursuant to *Anders,*we affirm the judgment of the district court. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be *908frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
- 1 - Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

August 5, 2010

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for an exemption under 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (San Antonio/Columbus/Austin/Tampa-Cancun)

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0196

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all carriers on the service list to the above referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, Delta urges that the application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: Brian Hedberg, DOT
info@airlineinfo.com
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kerry HERNANDEZ.

No. 89-KK-0175.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Hernandez, Kerry;—Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, and mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KW-0867; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 88-2766.

Denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MICHELLE MILLER,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Respondent

______________________

2023-2436

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. SF-0432-20-0165-I-2.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Michelle Miller’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this petition for review and the parties’ 

joint response as to the allocation of costs, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All other pending motions are denied as moot.

Case: 23-2436 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2024
2 MILLER v. COMMERCE

(3) Each party shall bear its own costs. 

August 28, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 28, 2024 

Case: 23-2436 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 08/28/2024
#### CITY OF NEW ORLEANS v. Jeffrey G. BROEKMAN.

No. 87-KK-1444.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied Oct. 30, 1987.

In re Broekman, Jeffrey G.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Orleans, Traffic Court of New Orleans, Div. “B”, No. F-793893; Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 317783; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW-7746.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|June 26, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to
his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Bank of Wilmington Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                    |  |                                         |  | 
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date:  May 12, 2006 |  | /s/ Betty V. Norris                     |  | 
|                    |  | Betty V. Norris Chief Financial Officer |  |
#### STATE ex rel. Leonard DOWELL v. 18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, CLERKS OFFICE, PARISH OF IBERVILLE.

No. 89-KH-0173.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Dowell, Leonard;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial *1174writs; Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 36362.

Denied. Relator has been provided with a copy of the district court’s ruling.
Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jonathan Snyder, certify that:

(1)           I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc.;

(2)           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(4)           The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15(d) - 15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date:  | January 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Jonathan Snyder         |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | Jonathan Snyder             |   |
|   |             |   | Principal Financial Officer |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32-2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Chief Financial  Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/THOMAS J. RIHA
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc




Date: November 12, 2007


                                       57
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2205 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro-5-oxo-naphthalene1-sulfonic acid ester with 2-[Bis(4-hydroxy-2,3,5- 

trimethylphenyl)methyl]phenol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro5-oxo-naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid ester with 2-[Bis(4-hydroxy-2,3,5-trimethylphenyl)methyl]phenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 6-DIAZO-5,6-DIHYDRO-5-OXO-NAPHTHALENE-1- 

4 SULFONIC ACID ESTER WITH 2-[BIS(4-HY5 DROXY-2,3,5-TRIMETHYLPHENYL)METHYL] 

6 PHENOL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2205 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 6-Diazo-5,6-dihydro-5-oxonaphthalene-1-sulfonic acid 

ester with 2-[Bis(4-hydroxy2,3,5-trimethylphenyl) methyl]phenol (CAS No. 184489– 

92–7) (provided for in subheading 2927.00.25) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section

As Adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Dana Waldman, Chief Executive Officer of Voyant International Corporation (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and



2.

The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 9, 2009





| |     |                        
| | --- | -----------------------
| | By: | /s/ Dana Waldman       
| |     |                        
| |     | Dana Waldman           
| |     | Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 1684** 

In R e: DWIGHT AVON MAJOR ,
Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. (5:12

- hc

- 02098

- D)

Submitted : October 30, 2015 Decided: November 18, 2015

Before KING, FLOYD, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Dwight Avon Major, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Dwight Avon Major petitions this court for a writ of
mandamus, seeking an order directing his immediate release from
prison . However, Major was released from prison on July 27,

2015. Thus, the mandamus petition is moot because Major has
already obtained the relief he seeks. Accordingly , although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition

for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because

the f acts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted in the

materials before this court and argument would not ai d the
decisional process.

PETITION DENIED