15396 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2012 / Notices 

Technologies Inc., Tai-Yuan, St. Jubei, 

TAIWAN; Crealab SRL, Rome, ITALY; 

Danal Entertainment Inc., Seongnam-si, 

Gyeonggi-do, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

decontis GmbH, Loebau, GERMANY; 

Dimark Software, Inc., Cupertino, CA; 

EnSoft Co., Ltd., BundangGu, Seongnam 

City, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; FancyFon 

Software Ltd., Cork, IRELAND; 

Funambol, Pavia, ITALY; Future Dial, 

Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Garmin 

International Inc., Olathe, KS; 

GlobalLogic Inc., San Jose, CA; GMIT 

GmbH, Berlin, GERMANY; GMV 

Soluciones Globales Internet, S.A.U., 

Madrid, SPAIN; GoldSpot Media Inc., 

Sunnyvale, CA; Handmark, Inc., Kansas 

City, MI; Hewlett-Packard, Cupertino, 

CA; iAnywhere Solutions Inc., Corvalis, 

OR; IBM Corporation, Somers, NY; IfeN 

GmbH, Poing, GERMANY; INNOACE 

Ltd., Twanak-gu, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA; Irdeto, Access B.V., Ka 

Moofodorp, NETHERLANDS; kt mhows 

Inc., Kangnam-gu, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA; Kvaleberg AS, Oslo, NORWAY; 

Mobixell Networks Ltd., Raanana, 

ISRAEL; Movial Applications, Helsinki, 

FINLAND; Myriad Group AG, Le 

Bourget Du Lac, FRANCE; NDS Limited, 

Middlesex, UNITED KINGDOM; O3SIS 

AG, Overath, GERMANY; Openwave, 

Redwood City, CA; PacketVideo Corp., 

San Diego, CA; Palm, Inc., Sunnyvale, 

CA; POINT–I CO., Ltd., Gwanjin-gu, 

Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

Prim’Vision, Villeneuve-Loubet, 

FRANCE; RedKnee, Inc., Mississauga, 

Ontario, CANADA; Roundbox, Inc., 

Bridgewater, NJ; Sagem Wireless, Paris, 

FRANCE; Sofia Digital Ltd., Tampere, 

FINLAND; Spectracore Technologies, 

San Diego, CA; Sprint, Lenexa, KS; SS8 

Networks, Milpitas, CA; Syniverse 

Technologies, Inc., Tampa, FL; Tactel 

AB, Jonkoping, SWEDEN; Telcordia, 

Piscataway, NJ; Telstra Corporation 

Limited, Melbourne, AUSTRALIA; Ublox AG, Thalwil, SWITZERLAND; and 

Z-Think, LLC., Alpharetta, GA. 

The following members have changed 

their names: Synclore Corporation to KII 

Corporation, Minato-ku, Tokyo, JAPAN; 

LG Telecom LTD. to LG Uplus Corp., 

Mapo-gu, Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

Mtag to Mobile Tag SAS, Paris, 

FRANCE; and Sagem Orga GmbH to 

Morpho Cards GmbH, Paderborn, 

GERMANY. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and OMA intends 

to file additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On March 18, 1998, OMA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on December 31, 1998 (63 FR 

72333). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on June 1, 2011. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on July 20, 2011 (76 FR 43346). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6292 Filed 3–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

[OMB Number 1110—NEW] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection, 

Comments Requested; Monthly Return 

of Human Trafficking Offenses Known 

to Law Enforcement 

ACTION: 30-day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review. 

The Department of Justice, Federal 

Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice 

Information Services Division (CJIS) 

will be submitting the following 

information collection request to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and clearance in 

accordance with established review 

procedures of the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. The proposed information 

collection is published to obtain 

comments from the public and affected 

agencies. This proposed information 

collection was previously published in 

the Federal Register Volume 77, 

Number 6, pages 1511–1512, on January 

10, 2012, allowing for a 60 day comment 

period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until (insert the date 30 days 

from the date this notice is published in 

the Federal Register). This process is 

conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 

1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to Mr. Gregory E. 

Scarbro, Unit Chief, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, CJIS Division, Module 

E–3, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, 

Clarksburg, West Virginia 26306; 

facsimile (304) 625–3566. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Comments 

should address one or more of the 

following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques of 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of information collection: 

New collection. 

(2) The title of the form/collection: 

Monthly Return of Human Trafficking 

Offenses Known to Law Enforcement 

(3) The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

department sponsoring the collection: 

No Form number. 

Sponsor: Criminal Justice Information 

Services Division, Federal Bureau of 

Investigation, Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: City, county, state, 

federal and tribal law enforcement 

agencies. Brief Abstract: This collection 

is needed to collect information on 

human trafficking incidents committed 

throughout the United States. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: There are approximately 

18,108 law enforcement agency 

respondents that submit monthly for a 

total of 217,296 responses with an 

estimated response time of 5 minutes 

per response. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with this 

collection: There are approximately 

18,108 hours, annual burden, associated 

with this information collection. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning 

Staff, Justice Management Division, 

United States Department of Justice, 

Two Constitutional Square, 145 N Street 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 51 / Thursday, March 15, 2012 / Notices 15397 

NE., Room 2E–508, Washington, DC 

20530. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, United 

States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6264 Filed 3–14–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Dominican Republic-Central AmericaUnited States Free Trade Agreement; 

Notice of Determination Regarding 

Review of Submission #2011–03 

AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor 

Affairs, U.S. Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Trade and Labor 

Affairs (OTLA) gives notice that on 

February 22, 2012, Submission #2011– 

03 was accepted for review pursuant to 

Article 16.4.3 of the Dominican 

Republic–Central America–United 

States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA– 

DR). 

Father Christopher Hartley filed the 

submission with OTLA on December 22, 

2011. The submitter alleges that the 

Government of the Dominican Republic 

(GODR) failed to fulfill its obligations 

under Chapter 16 of the CAFTA–DR (the 

Labor Chapter). U.S. Submission #2011– 

3 alleges that the GODR’s actions or lack 

thereof denied workers their rights 

under the laws of the Dominican 

Republic relating to freedom of 

association, the right to organize, child 

labor, forced labor, the right to bargain 

collectively, and acceptable conditions 

of work. These allegations are supported 

by statements which, if substantiated, 

could constitute a failure on the part of 

the Dominican Republic to comply with 

its obligations under the CAFTA–DR. 

The objective of the review of the 

submission will be to gather information 

so that OTLA can better understand the 

allegations therein and publicly report 

on the U.S. Government’s views 

regarding whether the GODR’s actions 

were consistent with its obligations 

under the Labor Chapter of the CAFTA– 

DR. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gregory Schoepfle, Director, OTLA, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Room S–5303, 

Washington, DC 20210. Telephone: 

(202) 693–4900. (This is not a toll-free 

number.) 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 

16.4.3 of the Labor Chapter of the 

CAFTA–DR provides for the receipt and 

review of public communications 

(‘‘submissions’’) regarding labor law 

matters in Central America and the 

Dominican Republic. A Federal Register 

notice issued on December 21, 2006 

informed the public that the OTLA had 

been designated as the office to serve as 

the contact point for implementing the 

CAFTA–DR’s labor provisions. The 

same Federal Register notice informed 

the public of the Procedural Guidelines 

that OTLA would follow for the receipt 

and review of public submissions (71 

FR 76691 (2006)). These Procedural 

Guidelines are available at http:// 

www.dol.gov/ilab/programs/otla/ 

proceduralguidelines.htm. According to 

the definitions contained in the 

Procedural Guidelines (Section B) a 

‘‘submission’’ is ‘‘a communication from 

the public containing specific 

allegations, accompanied by relevant 

supporting information, that another 

Party has failed to meet its 

commitments or obligations arising 

under a labor chapter or Part Two of the 

NAALC.’’ 

The Procedural Guidelines specify 

that OTLA shall consider six factors, to 

the extent that they are relevant, in 

determining whether to accept a 

submission for review: 

1. Whether the submission raises 

issues relevant to any matter arising 

under a labor chapter or the NAALC; 

2. Whether a review would further the 

objectives of a labor chapter or the 

NAALC; 

3. Whether the submission clearly 

identifies the person filing the 

submission, is signed and dated, and is 

sufficiently specific to determine the 

nature of the request and permit an 

appropriate review; 

4. Whether the statements contained 

in the submission, if substantiated, 

would constitute a failure of the other 

Party to comply with its obligations or 

commitments under a labor chapter or 

the NAALC; 

5. Whether the statements contained 

in the submission or available 

information demonstrate that 

appropriate relief has been sought under 

the domestic laws of the other Party, or 

that the matter or a related matter is 

pending before an international body; 

and 

6. Whether the submission is 

substantially similar to a recent 

submission and significant, new 

information has been furnished that 

would substantially differentiate the 

submission from the one previously 

filed. 

U.S. Submission #2011–3 alleges that 

the GODR’s actions or lack thereof 

denied workers their rights under the 

laws of the Dominican Republic relating 

to freedom of association, the right to 

organize, child labor, forced labor, the 

right to bargain collectively, and 

acceptable conditions of work. 

In determining whether to accept the 

submission, OTLA considered the 

relevant factors in light of the 

statements in the submission and its 

supporting documentation. The 

submission clearly identifies the 

submitter, is signed and dated, and 

upon clarification, was sufficiently 

specific to determine the nature of the 

request and permit an appropriate 

review. It also raises issues relevant to 

the Labor Chapter of the CAFTA–DR, 

citing numerous problems in the sugar 

sector that it believes are in violation of 

the Dominican Republic’s labor laws. 

The submission raises pertinent issues 

that would further the objectives of the 

Labor Chapter and that could, if 

substantiated, constitute a failure of the 

GODR to comply with its obligations 

under the Labor Chapter. The submitter 

provided additional information, 

including a list of articles of the Labor 

Code, the Constitution of the Dominican 

Republic, and ILO Conventions that he 

believes were violated by the allegations 

in the submission. The submitter 

provided information on his efforts to 

seek appropriate relief for these alleged 

violations under domestic laws and to 

raise the issues with GODR officials. 

The submission also notes that the 

issues in the submission have been 

raised in international fora, but to date, 

they have not been remedied. OTLA has 

not received similar submissions. 

Accordingly, OTLA has accepted the 

submission for review. 

OTLA’s decision to accept the 

submission for review is not intended to 

indicate any determination as to the 

validity or accuracy of the allegations 

contained in the submission. The 

objective of the review of the 

submission will be to gather information 

so that OTLA can better understand the 

allegations therein and publicly report 

on the issues raised by the submission. 

OTLA will complete the review and 

issue a public report within 180 days, 

unless circumstances, as determined by 

OTLA, require an extension of time, as 

set out in the Procedural Guidelines. 

The public report will include a 

summary of the review process, as well 

as any findings and recommendations. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES