alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 961

AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development

Act to improve shared appreciation arrangements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 961 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHARED APPRECIATION ARRANGEMENTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 353(e) of the Consoli3 dated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.

4 2001(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and insert5 ing the following:

6 ‘‘(2) TERMS.—A shared appreciation agreement

7 entered into by a borrower under this subsection

8 shall—

9 ‘‘(A) have a term not to exceed 10 years;

10 ‘‘(B) provide for recapture based on the

11 difference between—

12 ‘‘(i) the appraised value of the real se13 curity property at the time of restruc14 turing; and

15 ‘‘(ii) that value at the time of recap16 ture, except that that value shall not in17 clude the value of any capital improve18 ments made to the real security property

19 by the borrower after the time of restruc20 turing; and

21 ‘‘(C) allow the borrower to obtain a loan,

22 in addition to any other outstanding loans

23 under this title, to pay any amounts due on a

24 shared appreciation agreement, at a rate of in25 terest that is not greater than the rate of inter26 est on outstanding marketable obligations of
3

S 961 ES

1 the United States of a maturity comparable to

2 that of the loan.’’.

3 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendment made by sub4 section (a) shall apply to a shared appreciation arrange5 ment entered into under section 353(e) of the Consoli6 dated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.

7 2001(e)) that matures on or after the date of enactment

8 of this Act.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 961

AN ACT

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to improve shared appreciation arrangements.
#### JULIE NELSON *v.*DEB’S, INC., ET AL.

(SC 15732)

Callahan, C. J., and Borden, Berdon, Norcott and Katz, Js.

Argued January 14

officially released March 31, 1998

*Michael A. Stratton,*with whom was *Joseph Mirri-one,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*John J. D’Elia,*for the appellee (named defendant).

*Opinion*

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.1

The appeal is dismissed.

1

 We granted the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court, *Nelson*v. *Deb’s, Inc.,*45 Conn. App. 909, 698 A.2d 309 (1997), limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court correctly affirm that the claimant was an independant contractor based on a document that purported to be an amendment to the employment contract, which document was submitted into evidence over the objection of the claimant without identification or authentication evidence when the claimant denied that she was a party to the amendment?” *Nelson*v. *Deb’s, Inc.,*242 Conn. 912, 697 A.2d 366 (1997).
#### Robert Lee WATSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-923.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 3, 1988.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Lee Watson timely appeals the denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Watson claims that although he received a three-year minimum mandatory sentence for firearm possession during an armed robbery, the code-fendant, and not Watson, had actual possession of the firearm. It is well settled that the minimum mandatory sentence cannot be imposed for vicarious possession of a firearm. *See Earnest v. State,*351 So.2d 957 (Fla.1977); *Brown v. State,*397 So.2d 320 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). The trial judge summarily denied the motion, and failed to attach to his order portions of the record or file that refute Watson’s allegations.

*1035Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s denial of Watson’s motion and remand the case to the trial court. On remand, unless the files and records of the case conclusively show that Watson is entitled to no relief, the court shall order the state attorney to file an answer within a time certain. After receipt of the answer, the court shall determine whether an evidentiary hearing is required. If the court should again deny Watson’s motion, he has thirty days in which to appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

RYDER, A.C.J., and THREADGILL and PARKER, JJ., concur.
BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.
Mike Borsetti, Third-party Complainant V. American Airlines, Inc. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Docket DOT-OST-2015-0087

AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR THE FILING OF AMERICAN'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Comments with respect to this document should be addressed to:
Alec Bramlett, Esq. Senior Litigation Attorney AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. P.O. Box 619616 MD 5675 DFW Airport, Texas 75161

Dated: April24, 2015 Robert P. Silverberg, Esq. SILVERBERG GOLDMAN, LLP 1101 30th Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20007 Tel: 202-944-3300 E-Mail: rsilverberg@sgbdc.com Attorneys for AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.BEFORE THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D
.C.
Mike Borsetti, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Third

-party Complainant Docket DOT-OST-2015-0087 V. American Airlines, Inc.
AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DATE FOR THE FILING OF AMERICAN'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT The Complainant, Mike Borsetti, and the Respondent, American Airlines, Inc. ("American") hereby file this agreed motion to extend the date by which American will answer the docketed complaint to May 19, 2015. American requires a limited amount ofadditional time to research the issues raised in the complaint and to prepare and file its written answer thereto. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth above, and taking into account Mr. Borsettijoins in the filing ofthis motion, American hereby requests it be permitted to file its answer to the complaint on or before May 19, 2015
. Respectfully submitted, SILVERBERG GOLDMAN, L.L.P. Attorneys for

**AMK N**  AIRLINES, INC. By 

# t,£,.-1



# !?'\_~ Robe1i P
. Silverberg MIKE BORSETTI By: 

# A1.

**~** 

# ltJr.w/f{?iJ - Mike BorsettiCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have on this 24th day of April2015 , served a copy ofthe foregoing Agreed Motion by e-mail upon the following persons: Blane Workie Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings U.S. Department ofTransportation blane.workie(a),dot. gov Kimberly Graber Branch Chief Consumer Protection and Competition Law Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings U.S. Department ofTransportation**kimber y.gra** **er(c~dot.gov**
#### STATE ex rel. Donald LANDRY v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden et al.

No. 86-KH-1777.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Landry, Donald; applying for remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “B”, No. 281-015.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  accompanying  Annual  Report On Form 10-KSB/A of
Charys Holding Company, Inc. for the fiscal year ending April 30, 2005, I, Billy
V.  Ray,  Jr.,  Chief  Executive Officer of Charys Holding Company, Inc., hereby
certify  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.     Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ending April
30,  2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for
the  fiscal  year  ending  April  30,  2005,  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition and results of operations of Charys Holding
Company,  Inc.

     Dated:  May 4, 2006.

                                             /s/ Billy V. Ray, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                               Billy V. Ray, Jr.,
                                               Chief Executive Officer of
                                               Charys Holding Company, Inc.
<PAGE>

The Board of Directors
DSL Group Limited:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement (No. 333-38765) on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement (No. 333-38759) on Form S-4 and Registration Statement
(No. 333-71063) on Form S-8 of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report dated 15 April
1997 relating to the consolidated profit and loss account and consolidated cash
flow statement of DSL Group Limited and subsidiaries for the period from 3 June
1996 to 31 December 1996, which report appears in this Amendment No. 1 to Form
10-K of Armor Holdings, Inc. for the year ended 31 December 1998 and to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in such registration
statements.

/s/ KPMG
-----------------------
KPMG
London, England
27 May 1999
EXHIBIT
13.2



























Suite 405, 555 Sixth Street, New Westminster, BC, V3L 5H1

Tel: (604) 516-0566  |  Fax: (604) 516-0568





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert Scott, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:

March 31, 2005





signed  Robert Scott

______________________________________________

Robert Scott, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group Inc. onForm 10-K for the year ended December 29, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-133531, effectiveApril 25, 2006; File No. 333-140791, effective February 20, 2007; File No. 333-142573, effective May 3, 2007; and File No. 333-156663, effective January 9, 2009) and Form S-1 (File No. 333-142004, effectiveJune 7, 2007). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver, Colorado 

February 25, 2010
# L_2006125EN.01004301.xml

| 12.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/43

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 8 May 2006

amending Decision 2001/171/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council for the purpose of prolonging the validity of the conditions for a derogation for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC

(notified under document number C(2006) 1823)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/340/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste (1), and in particular Article 11(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The derogation laid down in Commission Decision 2001/171/EC (2) for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC expires on 30 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The derogation laid down in Commission Decision 2001/171/EC (2) for glass packaging in relation to the heavy metal concentration levels established in Directive 94/62/EC expires on 30 June 2006.

| (2) | The compliance throughout the Community with the 100 ppm limit value established in Article 11(1) of Directive 94/62/EC could only be achieved through a reduction of the glass recycling rate; however, such a reduction is not desirable from an environmental point of view. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The compliance throughout the Community with the 100 ppm limit value established in Article 11(1) of Directive 94/62/EC could only be achieved through a reduction of the glass recycling rate; however, such a reduction is not desirable from an environmental point of view.

| (3) | The validity of Decision 2001/171/EC should therefore be prolonged without any further expiry date. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The validity of Decision 2001/171/EC should therefore be prolonged without any further expiry date.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established pursuant to Article 21 of Directive 94/62/EC, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established pursuant to Article 21 of Directive 94/62/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 6 of Decision 2001/171/EC is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2006.

For the Commission

Stavros DIMAS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 365, 31.12.1994, p. 10. Directive as last amended by Directive 2005/20/EC (OJ L 70, 16.3.2005, p. 17).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 62, 2.3.2001, p. 20.

2

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Mercury Finance Company:

                         RE:  REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-8

                         o    Employee Stock Purchase Plan
                         o    1989 Stock Option and Incentive Compensation Plan
                         o    401(k) Plan

We consent to incorporation by reference in the subject Registration Statements
(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 3, 1989, May 11, 1989
and June 26, 1989) of Mercury Finance Company of our report dated February 12,
1996 except as to notes 2, 5, 12, 14, and 15 which are dated as of October 27,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Mercury Finance Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-K of Mercury Finance Company.

                                   /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 13, 1998
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and, |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:   May 23, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Darin M. Myman               |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Darin M. Myman                        |   |
|                                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |   |                                  |   |
#### Belle PLAISANCE v. LOOP, INC. et al.

No. 87-C-0366.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Plaisance, Belle; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5426; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 82-17780.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 736.

Denied.
Exhibit 11

                 Statement of Computation of Per Share Earnings

         Set forth below are the bases for the computation of earnings per share
for the periods shown. Information for 1999 has been adjusted to reflect the 10%
stock dividends paid in January 2000 and February 2001 and the two for one stock
split in the form of a dividend  paid in March  2000.  Information  for 2000 has
been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend paid in February 2001.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Year Ended December 31,
Earnings (loss) Per Common Share               2000              1999
                                          ---------------    --------------
<S>                                         <C>                <C>
     Basic                                    $1.66              $1.31
     Average Shares Outstanding             1,582,504          1,686,621
     Diluted                                  $1.63              $1.30
     Average Shares Outstanding             1,618,462          1,696,153
</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kelly Fielder, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Razor Resources Inc.
      for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Razor Resources Inc.                                                                

Dated: September 20, 2010

| | /s/
      Kelly Fielder                                        
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Kelly Fielder                                                  
| | President, Secretary and Director                              
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Razor Resources Inc.                                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Razor Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Louis MATIRE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4-86-1361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Sept. 16, 1987.

Upon Motion for Rehearing March 2, 1988.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Anthony Calvello, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Diane E. Leeds, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction. However, the state admits that in light of the holding in *Whitehead v. State,*498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986), decided subsequent to the sentencing proceedings below, a habitual offender status is not an adequate reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines. Therefore, the trial judge erred in departing from the guidelines on the basis of finding the defendant a habitual offender. Accordingly, we remand for sentencing within the guidelines range.

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., and LUZZO, JOHN T., Associate Judge, concur.

UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted in part, and we delete from the last sentence of the first paragraph in the September 16, 1987, opinion in this case the closing clause, “unless the trial court states valid reasons for departure,” as well as the subsequent two paragraphs.

This modification takes cognizance of the recent holding of the Florida Supreme Court that when the trial court’s only stated reason for departure from the guidelines sentencing range is invalid, resentenc-ing must be within the presumptive guidelines range. *Shull v. Dugger,*515 So.2d 748, 750 (Fla.1987). Therefore, on remand, the trial court may not utilize new reasons to justify a departure from the recommended guidelines sentence.

GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., and LUZZO, JOHN T., Associate Judge, concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2215 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric coffee makers with built 

in bean storage hoppers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain electric coffee 

makers with built in bean storage hoppers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS WITH 

4 BUILT IN BEAN STORAGE HOPPERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2215 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Electric coffee makers with a 

built in bean storage hopper 

that has a capacity of 227 

grams and a burr grinder 

which dispenses ground beans 

directly into a brew basket 

and with a carafe capacity of 

1.77 liters or more but not 

more than 2.065 liters (provided for in subheading 

8516.71.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS