alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
      31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Brooklyn
      Cheesecake & Desserts Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Anthony J. Merante, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that





(i)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(ii)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:
      January 11, 2008


/s/
      Anthony J. Merante


_____________________________________




Anthony
      J. Merante


President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





35
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1194

TANYON WATSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT FOR AGING & VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES; CARRIE GILBERT, DARS Counselor; DAVIAN MORRELL, DARS Counselor; DOUG JAMES, DARS Regional Director; TERRY BERTSCH; JULIE TRIPLETT, VA Disability Law Center Advocate , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Liam O ’ Grady , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 01002

- LO

- MSN )

Submitted : March 30, 2017 Decided: April 4, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tanyon Watson , Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Brown Beckner , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia ; Steven Michael Traubert , DISABILITY LAW CENTER OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Tanyon Watson seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing hi s civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorde d 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4 (a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on January 6, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed on February 9, 2017. Because Watson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss

t he appeal. We deny Watson’ s motions to appoint counsel and to respond. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2357 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2357

    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-cyclo-hexylidene-2-phenyl-
                             acetonitrile.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-cyclo-hexylidene-2-phenyl-
                             acetonitrile.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-CYCLO-HEXYLIDENE-2-PHENYL-ACETONITRILE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-cyclo-hexylidene- Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        2-phenyl-                                                          31/2011.......
                        acetonitrile (CAS
                        No. 10461-98-0)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2926.90.43)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Amendment Number 2 to the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. SaraWilliams,certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.





Date:
January 8, 2009





/s/ Sara
Williams


Sara
Williams


Treasurer
(principal financial officer)





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GARY ANTHONY VALENTINE,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50279

D.C. No. 3:09-cr-03489-JLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Gary Anthony Valentine appeals from the 46-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana and aiding and

abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50279

Valentine contends that the district court erred in determining that the

government’s substantial assistance motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) permitted it

to consider only factors related to substantial assistance, and not the factors set

forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining the extent of the downward departure. 

This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Jackson, 577 F.3d 1032, 1036

(9th Cir. 2009).

Valentine also contends that his sentence was substantively unreasonable in

light of the section 3553(a) factors. Because the district court could not reduce

Valentine’s sentence on the basis of those factors, this contention fails. See id.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Marty Williams, Chief Executive Officer
and Presidentof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
September 29, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/ Marty
Williams
 Marty
Williams
 Chief
Executive Officer, President
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement  on Form S-8  (No.  333-2978  and  333-32481),  and in the  Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration  Statement on Form S-3 (No.  333-47719) of
CFC  International,  Inc. of our report dated  February 11, 2000 relating to the
financial  statements and financial  statement  schedule,  which appears in this
Form 10-K.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4046-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]


Connecticut; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for State of Connecticut (FEMA-4046-DR), dated November 17, 2011, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 29, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Stephen M. DeBlasio Sr., 
as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households in 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.)

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator,
    Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-6358 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2220

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of camel hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on noils of camel hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOILS OF CAMEL HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.25 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to noils of camel hair) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice of public availability of FY 2011 service contract inventory.

# SUMMARY:

                        In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is publishing this notice to advise the public of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at                         *http://www.whitehouse.gov/​omb/​procurement-service-contract-inventories.*                         NEH has posted its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the NEH homepage at the following link:                         *http://www.neh.gov/​whoweare/​administrative.html.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Barry Maynes, Director, Administrative Services Office at 202-606-8233 or                         *bmaynes@neh.gov.*

Dated: March 6, 2012.

Michael P. McDonald,

General Counsel and Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5836 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1460
JEREMIAH HENDERSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES V. DOSS, III, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (6:07-cv-00006-nkm) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeremiah Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. Leggette, LEGGETTE LAW FIRM, PLC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeremiah Henderson appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Doss , No. 6:07-cv-00006-nkm (W.D. Va. May 18, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0380

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MARY DARLEAN WRIGHT,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including March 11, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 2 2022

02/02/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0380
#### John BENSON, individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of David Wyatt Benson, and Tommye Benson, Appellants, v. Cindy House BENSON and Arrow Air, Inc., Appellees.

No. 87-2964.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

Charles R. Lipcon and Brett Rivkind, Miami, for appellants.

Speiser, Krause and Madole, Washington, D.C., Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefs-berg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin and Joel Eaton, Thornton, David & Murray and Terry L. Redford, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court correctly ruled that appellants, decedent’s parents, were without standing to bring a wrongful death action in Florida. Section 768.20, Florida Statutes (1985), directs that a wrongful death action must be brought by the personal representative. In this case, decedent’s wife, not his parents, serves as “administratrix” of the estate. As a result, the parents lack standing to sue, and the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the parents' claim. Furthermore, appellants, who are merely potential beneficiaries in the wrongful death action instituted by decedent’s ad-ministratrix, lacked standing in the trial court to contest the court’s determination of applicable law. *Poyer v. Burris,*533 *890So.2d 888 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We affirm the dismissal of appellants’ claims.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerApril
      21, 2010
NO. 07-07 -038 8-CR IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D OC TOBER5, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ JUAN ROBERT O RODRIGUEZ, APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 22 7 T H DI ST RI CT COU RT OF B EXA R CO UNT Y; NO . 90- CR -1 294; HO NO RA BLE P HI LIP A. K AZE N, JR ., JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON On S eptember

12, 2007, Appel lan t, Juan Rob erto R odr ig uez , an inmat e proceed ing pro s e, fil ed a Petiti

on for Lawful

D am ages for

Br each of C ontr

act. He all eg es br each of a parole co ntract cl aim and seek s d amag es for menta l ang uis h. By l etter date d Sept ember 14, 2 007, t hi s C ou rt no ti fi ed R od r i g ue zt o prov i de a fi na l j ud g me nto r o th er a pp ea l able2

order , not ing thatfail ur e to do s o mi g ht resul t in di smi ss al pursuantto Rul e 42. 3( a) of the Tex as Rul es of Appel lat e Procedu re . In res ponse , Rodr ig uezfil ed a Not ic e of Appeal . The cause num ber he has p rov ided in his docum ent s ref lects a 19 90 crimin al cause num ber. Rod ri g uezdi d not , how ev er , prov ide a fina l jud g ment or othe r appeal abl e order . T his Court ha s app ellate jurisdiction over fina l judgmen ts and othe r appe alab le orders and has no author it y to fil e pet it ion s i nit iat ing l it ig ati on. Addi ti onal ly , Ap pel lan t has not p ro v ide d any

auth o rityor

doc umentati on th at w oul d aut hor iz e an appeal from t he under ly ing proceed ing . S e e S ta le y v . S tate , No . AP -7 5,462, 2007 W L 26224 26, a t * 1 (Te x .Crim.Ap p. Se pt. 1 2, 2 0 07). Conse quently, w e ha v e no auth orityto ent ertain his compl ain t. Acc ordin g ly , t his pur por ted a ppeal i s d is mis sed for w ant o f jur is dic ti on.

Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice Do not p ubl is h.