alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
O rder filed July 28, 2015



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No. 11

- 1 5

- 00 1 69

- C V

__________ IN RE THE STATE OF T EXAS EX REL. MICHAEL MUNK

Original Mandamus Proceeding

O R D E R This is an original mandamus proceeding filed by Relator, the State of Texas, acting by and through the District Attorney for the 106th Judicial District, Michael
Munk

. Relator seeks an emergency temporary stay requesting a stay of the
enforcement of an o rder
, issued on July 22, 2015 , to produce discovery by 5:00 p.m. on July 30, 2015

. The trial court’s order to produce discovery bears the style “ State of Texas v. Dimas Gonzalez ,” and was entered by the trial judge of the 106th District
Court of Dawson County, Texas. However, the order to produce discovery does not bear a trial court cause number. It appears to have been filed in a criminal proceeding that has not yet been filed in the trial court.2

Pursuant to the authority of T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b ), Relator’s motion seeking temporary relief is granted. The enforcement of the order to produce discovery is stayed for all purposes pending further order of this court. Furthermore, upon reviewing State’s application for emergency temporary stay and for writs of mandamus and prohibition , the Court requests Real Party in
Interest Dimas Gonzalez to file a response. This response is due on or before August 10, 2015 . If Respondent
, Judge Carter T. Schildknecht
, desires to file a response, it is also due on or before August 10, 2015.

PER CURIAM

July 28, 201 5 Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J ., and Bailey, J

.
exv10w30



 





Exhibit 10.30




ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED

NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

2006 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN



The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ABM Industries Incorporated (the “Company”)
is pleased to grant you (the “Grantee”) a nonqualified stock option under the Company’s 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to purchase shares of common stock of the Company as described below:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Grantee Name:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Number of Shares
	 	 	 	 
	Subject to Option:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Price Per Share:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Grant Date:
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Vesting Schedule:	 	25% on each of the first four anniversary dates of the Grant Date
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Expiration Date:	 	7 years from Grant Date (or earlier if employment terminates)





Provided you continue to provide services to the Company or any subsidiary or parent of the Company
through the applicable vesting date, the Option will vest as provided above. The unvested portion
of the Option may be subject to forfeiture if you terminate employment before the vesting date, as
set forth in the Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto.



The Plan and the Statement of Terms and Conditions attached hereto are incorporated herein by
reference. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Plan or in the Statement of Terms and Conditions, as applicable.



The Grantee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan, the Statement of Terms and Conditions and
the Plan Prospectus, represents that the Grantee has carefully read and is familiar with their
provisions, and hereby accepts the Option subject to all of their terms and conditions.



Please sign your name in the space provided below on this Option Agreement and return an executed
copy to Sandra Briggs, ABM Industries Incorporated, 160 Pacific Ave., Ste. 222, San Francisco, CA
94111.



By their signatures below, the Company and the Grantee agree that the Option is granted under and
governed by this Option Agreement and by the provisions of the Plan and the Statement of Terms and
Conditions.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED	 	GRANTEE	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Henrik C. Slipsager	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	President & Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	Date:	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





ATTACHMENTS:




2006 Equity Incentive Plan

Statement of Terms and Conditions

2006 Equity Incentive Plan Prospectus
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Richard A. Miller, M.D., President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to   §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C.   §1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Pharmacyclics, Inc, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Leiv Lea, Vice President, Finance and Administration and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to   §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00472
- CR

Donald Kenneth Mitchell, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 77434, THE HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Donald Kenneth Mitchell seeks to appeal his December 7, 2017 judgment of conviction. The thirty

- day deadline for perfecting the appeal was January 8, 2018, and the deadline for seeking an extension of time to file the not ice of appeal was January 22, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1, 26.2(a)(1), 26.3

. But t h is notice of appeal was fil ed S e ptember 2 1 , 2020

. 1

Under the circumstances, we lack jurisdiction to dispose of this purported appeal in any manner other than by dism issing it for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522

- 23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (concluding that when belated notice of appeal is filed without timely motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal, appellate court must

1 T his is Mi t chell ’ s second attempted appeal from this conviction. See Mitchell v. State , No. 03

- 18

- 00210

- CR, 2018 Tex. App. LEXIS 4196 , at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin June 12, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for pu blication). The remedy for a l ate

- filed notice of appeal is to file a postconviction writ of habeas corp us returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out

- of

- time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07

.2

dismis s purported appeal for lack of jurisdiction); see also Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that amendments to rules of appellate procedure did not affect Olivo ’s rationale requiring timely notice of appeal to vest appellate court with jurisdiction).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction

.

__________________________________________ Jeff Rose, Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Baker and Kelly Dismissed for Want of Jurisdictio n Filed: October 16, 2020 Do Not Publish
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 **SECTION
        1350 CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT
        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2007 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        "Report"), I, Robert B. Dillon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, these financial statements were not reviewed
        by
        our independent registered public accountants; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
        March 26, 2007
 
 
 /s/
        Robert B. Dillon
 ------------------------------
 Chief
        Executive Officer
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**SECTION      1350 CERTIFICATION**

**OF      THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|   | (1) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended                September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended,                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November                14, 2006 |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                        |   |   |   |
| /s/ KEVIN              PENDERGEST      |   |   |   |
| Kevin              Pendergest               |   |   |        |
| Chief Financial Officer                     |   |   |        |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1228

KIMBERLY A. REATH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv
- 00053

- H )

Submitted : May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kimberly A. Reath, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kimberly A. Reath seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing he r complaint . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party , the notice of appeal must
be filed no more than 60 days after the entry of the distr ict court ’ s final judgment or order , Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B ), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on April 14, 2016 . The notice of appeal was filed on February 16, 2017 . Because Reath failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance
      Resources Corp. for the quarter ended May 31, 2007, I certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Nuance Resources Corp. for the quarter
              ended May 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
              quarter ended May 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the
              financial condition and results of operations of Nuance Resources
              Corp..
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:
            /s/
                James D. BunneyName:
            James
                D. BunneyTitle:
            Principal
                Executive Officer,
              Principal
                Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            July
                16, 2007
Exhibit
      32.1





***CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***


***PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Patrick MontalbanName:
            Patrick
                MontalbanTitle:
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer, andTreasurer




May
      ***,
      2008




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
      Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-36659 of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. (successor to Argyle Television,
Inc.) on Form S-3 and the related prospectus of our report dated February 26,
1998, (March 9, 1998 as to Note 16), relating to the consolidated financial
statements and the financial statement schedule appearing in and incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1997.





DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 30, 1998
AFS-12-084-E 

December 16, 2011 

 Exemption No. 10411 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8750 

Mr. Estel Breeding, Jr. 

Director, Credentialing Programs and 

 Co-Chair, JSAMTCC 

Community College of the Air Force 

100 South Turner Boulevard 

Maxwell-Gunter AFB, AL 36114 

Dear Mr. Breeding: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8251, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 12, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) for an extension of Exemption 

No. 8251, as amended. That exemption from § 147.31(c)(2)(iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations allows CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who 

have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be evaluated using the same 

criteria used for the civilian sector. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CCAF. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8251, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 
 2

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8251, as amended, to 

February 28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8251, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8251. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Zandaria  Ventures  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  February 11, 2008


/s/ Jason Smart
------------------------------------------
Jason Smart, Principal Financial Officer





-------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****OFFICER’S SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**     Each of the undersigned officers of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevadacorporation (the “Company”) hereby certifies that: (i) The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and  (ii) The information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, atand for the periods indicated.Dated: November 7, 2005         By:                                           /s/ Robert N. Crouch II    Robert N. Crouch II, Executive Vice    President, Chief Financial Officer andActing Principal Executive Officer
#### Dr. Maurice Edward ST. MARTIN, Jr. Armand Edward St. Martin and Celeste Patten St. Martin v. Robert Autry LANIER, Frances Osborne Lanier and Government Employees Insurance Company.

No. 89-CC-0986.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 19, 1989.

In re Lanier, Robert Autry; Lanier, Frances Osborne; Government Employees Ins. Co.; — Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “C”, No. 88-10543; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 89CW-0132.

Denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2283 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Cyclic TMP Formal. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Cyclic TMP 

Formal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYCLIC TMP FORMAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.96 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cyclic TMP Formal) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2283 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS