alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A
      Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
      18
      U.S.C. SECTION. 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of LGA Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      for
      the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934
      and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      September 28, 2007




/s/
      Sara Williams


Sara
      Williams


Treasurer
      (principal financial officer)





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
Exhibit 13.1

Section 906 Certification

In
connection with the Annual Report of Titan Cable plc (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Neil Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
June 30, 2005

| | /s/BARRY R. ELSONBarry R. Elson pincipal executive
officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40924

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON ANTONIO SORTO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-105-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Nelson Antonio Sorto appeals his guilty-plea conviction and

sentence for illegal reentry. Sorto argues that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2)

are unconstitutional. 

Sorto’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Sorto contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
No. 05-40924

-2-

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Sorto properly concedes that his argument

is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal****Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              July
                29, 2008
**Exhibit
      32**





Certification
      of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
      to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended
      June
      30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned
      hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigneds’ knowledge:




(1)         The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the
      period certified.




Date: December
                  22, 2006
              
              By:
              
              /s/
                  Richard S. Foote**Richard
                  S. Foote****President
                  and Chief Executive Officer****(Principal
                  Executive Officer)**By:
              
              /s/
                  R. Bradley Forth**R.
                  Bradley Forth****Executive
                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
                  Secretary****(Principal
                  Financial Officer)**
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Availability for Exclusive, Non-Exclusive, or 
Partially-Exclusive Licensing of an Invention Concerning a Method and 
Device for Detection of Bioavailable Drug Concentration in a Fluid 
Sample

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DOD.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice published in the Federal Register on January 6, 
2012 (77 FR 783) contained an incorrect U.S. Provisional Patent 
Application Serial No. The correct number is 61/105,604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth 
Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808. For licensing issues, Dr. Paul 
Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-
6664, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-649 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
### Re g u l a t o ry Ev a luati o n

D o cket N o. FAA- Direc torate I d e ntifi e r: - A D



### Add the work 

### hours, parts cost, 

### and n wn lu:r 

## <l U.S. r egistered produc ts 

### to the table bel01v

. W h en yo u are 

### f/11ished. click on the ·• Update Fields,. buT/on to auwmaticalzvjill 

### in the totals. U

pdate F i e lds 

# I

Estima t e d Co s t s : Acti o n Co s ts per Pr o duct ( e . g., a ircraft, eng ine, (e.g., In spection, prope ll e r , ap pl i a n ce ) W o rk-hour s L abor Parts Cost To tal Co sts Number o f To ta l Cost r e p lacem e nt) ( incl ud e c os t ( labor+ 

# u.s . for U .S

. Fle et D o n o t include oncondition costs 

### here acc ess, t e st in g, (@S85/h parts) Reg i s t e r ed an d cl o s e - up) o ur ) P r od uct s In sp ec t ion 

### 2 .8 0 )**·H~** 

### Oil 

### 0 

## ' OQ.J t).O' {I (;' LIOO 

### 00 I) (J;J ) 

### 0.00 

# " (),()) I).OIJ 

### ' 0 (l:J ()tl f !/• (I 

### 00 0 () j I) O•J \ 

### CLOO 

### o O'l ) {)t) 

### .., •1 ()() [ ' 

### HI

.... 0 (J .I 

### ' I). ()\I 

## \ o.on (>.0 (}:) ' !) If) 

### 0.11**~** (; () \ f) (I J**~')** {1/l '• l. 0.1111



### . ) 011

. 

## s n 11 

## n CJO \ 

# n: { (J I)(' 

### 0**~)** • I () l () II() 

# s () 

# s I) (), 

### () 00**I}~** ',!, (1.(}!, 01 "> '• IJ.ll!,**~** 

### 0 (

. I) 

## o 

# no

T h e kn o wn number o f pro du ct s i n c omp l iance: 

### 0 To tal Cos t s of com p l i a n ce f o r 

### U .S. fl eet: $ 

### 0 Cos ts covered under w arra n ty 

### (ifknOlv n ) $ Warramy

On -C o n d iti on Co s t s:

# ~ Acti o n W o rk

- hour s Labor c o st P art s Co st Co s t pe r P ro d uct (e.g., Inspection, (inc lu de access, (@ $8 5/ h ou r ) repl ac ement ) testing, and c lose up) In s t a ll mis s in g ti e rod s 

### 0.6 <!,·' 

### 1027 lr.lll)**~** !) t; 

### ' 0 ()ll**~** 0 11(1 \;, I'

### Specia l considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field t o explain anything in the E stimated Costs table that was assumed o r might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty co sts ) : 

### Executive Ord e r 12866:
Could the AD be consid e red a "sig nificant regulatory

# action**"? ~**  YE S* 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Polici es a nd Procedure s : Is the AD significant?

# ~ Y ES* 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flex ibili ty Act : Will the AD ha ve a significant economic impact on a s ubstantial number of small entities? Exp lain for either a Yes or No

# answ**r. ~**  Y ES 

## 0**NO~** 

### Explanation: 

### Intras tate Aviation in Alaska : This AD cou ld affect intrastate aviation in A laska. I s it appropriate to include spec ific requirement s for aircraft operated in Ala ska where aviation might be the on l y mode of t rans porta tion?

# ~ Y ES* 0**NO~** 

### *Explanation:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE


Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Change in Hearing Date 
for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice of change to hearing date and due date for post-hearing 
comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The date of the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review 
is changed to Thursday, March 29, 2012. Post-hearing comments are due 
Monday, April 16, 2012.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 21, 2012, a notice was published 
in the Federal Register (77 FR 10034) announcing, inter alia, that the 
hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review was scheduled for March 
20, 2012 and post-hearing comments were due April 10, 2012. This notice 
changes the time and date of that hearing to 1 p.m., Thursday, March 
29, 2012 and the due date for post-hearing comments to 5 p.m., Monday, 
April 16, 2012. The hearing will cover only the petitions for new 
products and CNL waivers that have been previously submitted and 
accepted for review in the 2011 GSP Annual Review. (See 76 FR 67531 and 
77 FR 10034.)

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tameka Cooper, GSP Program, Office of 
the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20508. The telephone number is (202) 395-6971; the fax 
number is (202) 395-9674, and the email address is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6632070b030d073925090916031426131512144803091648010910"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="085c69656d6369574b6767786d7a487d7b7c7a266d6778266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

William D. Jackson,
Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for the Generalized System 
of Preferences and Chair of the GSP Subcommittee of the Trade Policy 
Staff Committee, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2012-6454 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W2-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RECORD OF CONVERSTION

JACKSONVILLE UNIVERSITY EXEMPTION REQUEST

FAA-2014-0064

From: Lundgren, Douglas (FAA) 

Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 2:48 PM

To: 'mwillet@ju.edu'

Subject: Request for additional information regarding Jacksonville University petition for exemption FAA 

2014-0064

Dear Captain Willett:

I am a technical specialist assigned to perform part of the analysis for the Jacksonville University (JU) 

exemption request for the 14CFR 61.160 requirement for an institution of higher education that desires 

to hold a Letter of Authorization to hold its own Part 141 pilot school certificate.

Let me apologize on behalf of the agency for the time it has taken to process JU’s petition.

We would like to request the following additional information which would help us in our deliberations:

1) A copy of the most current JU-Aerosim training agreement. (The one on file uses the names 

Comair Academy and Delta Connection Academy)

2) Any available details as to how JU controls the content and curriculum of what is taught in the 

Part 141 ground school classes. (The training agreement has some information on this)

3) A description of the JU operational safety program, how it oversees the part 141 school, and the 

safety record for Aerosim at Craig Field, if available.

4) An update on how many graduates would benefit from the issuance of an exemption to 14CFR 

section 61.160.

We understand that JU has applied for a Part 141 pilot school certificate with the Orlando FSDO in 

January 2015.

Thank you in advance for your assistance in this request.

Sincerely,

Douglas J. Lundgren

Aviation Safety Inspector

Airman Certification and Training Branch AFS-810

Federal Aviation Administration HQ

800 Independence Avenue

Washington, DC 20591

Douglas.lundgren@faa.gov

Wash FSDO office: 703-230-7664 ext 274 (rolls to telework number)

Telework: 240-422-7007
#### Sandra BAKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 87-2232.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1988.

*458Mark E. NeJame of NeJame *&*Hyman, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner.

No Appearance for respondent.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This matter is before the court to have issued a writ of certiorari to the circuit court to review its opinion reversing a county court order dismissing a criminal information.

This court will not exercise certiorari jurisdiction to review an order denying a motion to dismiss or a circuit court opinion reversing an order granting a motion to dismiss, both of which amount to the same thing. An adequate remedy by appeal, if conviction ensues, is available. *See*Rule 9.140(b) and (c), Fla.R.App.P.; *Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage,*509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987); *Combs v. State,*436 So.2d 93 (Fla.1983); *State v. Soto,*444 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

Certiorari denied.

UPCHURCH, C.J., and ORFINGER, J., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Ernest DANIELS v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2464.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Daniels, Ernest; applying for writ of certiorari, prohibition mandamus or ha-beas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “A”, No. 247-362.

Denied.
Order filed, March 18, 2015

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The



## First District of Texas

____________

NO. 01

- 15

- 00097

- CV

EVA CAMBY AND TERENITA BOUDREAUX , Appellant

V.

SOCA FUNDING, LLC AS ASSIGNEE OF PEARLAND GROUND, LLC BY CBL

& ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT INC. MANAGING AGENT , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Case 64613



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 9, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed

timely, we issue the following order.We order Robin Rios , the offic ial (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal , if any, within 30 days of the date of this order

.

/s/ Jane Bland

Acting individually
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6629

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ISAAC NOREL STURDIVANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00123-WO-1)

Submitted: August 18, 2016 Decided: August 23, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Norel Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Michael A. DeFranco, 

Sandra Jane Hairston, Robert Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett 

Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, Paul Alexander Weinman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Norel Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order 

granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence 

reduction based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual.* We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See United States v. Sturdivant, No. 

1:10–cr–00123-WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2016). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The district court granted Sturdivant’s § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, but did not reduce his sentence to the full extent he 

requested.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1869 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1869

    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mixed xylidines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on mixed xylidines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXED XYLIDINES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to mixed xylidines) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TIMOTHY RYAN HAMMOCK, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-5019

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

 )

Opinion filed May 22, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; William D. Sites and Reinaldo 

Ojeda, Judges.

Timothy Ryan Hammock, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
#### Daniel Gardner EAGERTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-428.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 10, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 15, 1988.

S. Perry Penland, Jr., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and William A. Hatch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/petitioner seeks review by petition for writ of common law certiorari of an order of the circuit court, rendered in its appellate capacity, that affirmed the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial. Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). Upon review of the petition, we find that the petitioner has not shown that the circuit court’s decision was a departure from the essential requirements of law. *See Brooks v. Owens,*97 So.2d 693 (Fla.1957); *Butler Construction and Crims, Inc. v. Walker,*524 So.2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); *Deseret Ranches v. St. Johns River Water Management District,*406 So.2d 1132 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Accordingly, the petition for certiorari is denied.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eric J. OLSEN.

No. 89-KK-0050.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Olsen, Eric J.;—Defendants); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. *1170"J”, No. 7-88-887; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KW88 2013.

Denied.
Fw: Interagency Comments on EGU MACT 

 RobertJ Wayland 

 to: tsirigotis.peter 

 11/28/2011 10:03 PM 

 Cc: blake.wendy, Paul Versace, Bill Maxwell, Nick Hutson, Mary 

Johnson, Kevin Culligan, wegman.lydia 

 

FYI - attached are the initial set of interagency comments on MATS. 

----- Forwarded by RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US on 11/28/2011 10:01 PM 

----- 

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/28/2011 09:33 PM 

Subject: Interagency Comments on EGU MACT 

Hi Bob, 

 

Attached you will find the interagency comments on the EGU MACT preamble 

and RIA. Also attached is a supplemental document referenced in the 

comments. Finally, a redline of the preamble is also attached that 

contains comments that are not included in the interagency comments 

document. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney