alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MARIA DELGADILLO-MEJIA,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 21-1201

Agency No. A205-467-286

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 11, 2023**

San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit 

Judges.

Jose Maria Delgadillo-Mejia petitions for review of a Board of 

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order refusing to sua sponte reopen his removal 

proceedings. “When the BIA denies sua sponte reopening . . . as a matter of

discretion, we lack jurisdiction to review that decision, although we retain

jurisdiction to review the denial of sua sponte reopening for ‘legal or

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not 

precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 15 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-1201

constitutional error.’” Rubalcaba v. Garland, 998 F.3d 1031, 1035 (9th Cir. 

2021) (quoting Lona v. Barr, 958 F.3d 1225, 1229 (9th Cir. 2020)).

Delgadillo-Mejia argues only that the BIA legally erred by determining 

that the Notice to Appear (“NTA”), which omitted the time and location 

information required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)(1)(G)(i), did not deprive the 

immigration judge of jurisdiction over his removal proceedings. This argument 

is foreclosed by United States v. Bastide-Hernandez, 39 F.4th 1187, 1191–92

(9th Cir. 2022) (en banc) (holding that an NTA’s failure to comply with the 

requirements under § 1229(a)(1)(G)(i) does not deprive the immigration court 

of jurisdiction), cert. denied, No. 22-6281, 2023 WL 350056 (U.S. Jan. 23, 

2023). 

PETITION DENIED.
#### Ingrid TRAUT v. UNIROYAL, INC.

No. 88-CA-2148.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1989.

*1288John J. Gillon, Jr. New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Wood Brown, III, Lawrence G. Pugh, III, Montgomery, Barnett, Brown, Read, Hammond & Mintz, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before SCHOTT, C.J., and KLEES and LOBRANO, JJ.

SCHOTT, Chief Judge.

On November 7,1988 the court dismissed this appeal on an ex parte motion of appel-lee. On the following day appellant filed a motion for a new trial and reinstatement of its appeal. The court has readily agreed to reconsider the dismissal because such dismissal on an ex parte motion was contrary to the policy of the court and was inadvertently granted. The matter has now been submitted to the court on rehearing on briefs by the parties.

This case was tried in the First City Court on June 15, 1988 and was taken under advisement by the court. The judgment was signed on June 22 and a notice of judgment was prepared and presumably mailed on that day. Appellant filed its motion for appeal on July 7, 1988.

C.C.P. art. 5003 provides that an appeal from a judgment of a city court must be taken “within ten days from the date of the judgment or from the service of notice of judgment, when such notice is necessary.” In this case notice of judgment was necessary since the case was taken under advisement upon completion of the trial. C.C.P. art. 1913. Appellee contends that the ten day period should be counted from June 22 when the clerk presumably mailed the notice of judgment to appellee.

This question was settled in *Points v. Laird,*460 So.2d 771 (La.App. 4th Cir.1984) in which the court held that the ten day delay for an appeal under C.C.P. art. 5003 would commence from the date of the notice of judgment was received by counsel for appellant. In this case counsel for appellant asserts that the notice was received by his office on June 28. The court accepts this date without question so that the appeal taken on July 7 was on time.

We reiterate our position in the *Points*case. Art. 5003 provides that the delay is to run from the “service of notice” not the mailing of the notice as specifically provided for in arts. 1974, 2087(3) and 2123(3). To equate the phrases “service of notice” and “mailing of notice” resulting in the dismissal of this appeal would be inconsistent with the policy of endeavoring to preserve appeals in doubtful cases. The unreliability of the postal service is so pervasive that the commencement of a ten day appeal time on the date of mailing would lead to widespread injustices.

Accordingly, the appeal is reinstated.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14571]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6043]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act; Board of Directors Meeting, March 29, 2012

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, March 29, 2012, 10 a.m. (Open Portion) 10:15 
a.m. (Closed Portion).

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Meeting open to the Public from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. Closed 
portion will commence at 10:15 a.m. (approx.).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. President's Report.
    2. Confirmations:
     Roberto R. Herencia as a member of the Board Audit Committee.
     Allen Villabroza as Vice President & Chief Financial Officer.
    3. Minutes of the Open Session of the December 8, 2011 Board of 
Directors Meeting.

FURTHER MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    (Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.):
    1. Finance Project--India.
    2. Finance Project--Global.
    3. Finance Project--Turkey.
    4. Insurance Project--Ghana.
    5. Minutes of the Closed Session of the December 8, 2011 Board of 
Directors Meeting.
    6. Reports.
    7. Pending Major Projects.

Written summaries of the projects to be presented will be posted on 
OPIC's Web site on or about March 9, 2012.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

    Dated: March 9, 2012.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2012-6043 Filed 3-8-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER  31,  1999,  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
     STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999, AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000845779
<NAME>                          Abatix Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          106,793
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   7,644,949
<ALLOWANCES>                    (616,678)
<INVENTORY>                     5,393,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                13,220,493<F1>
<PP&E>                          2,758,363
<DEPRECIATION>                  (2,128,567)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,204,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           9,171,394
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,437
<OTHER-SE>                      6,030,977<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,204,808
<SALES>                         44,229,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                44,229,758
<CGS>                           32,358,985
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   32,358,985
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                10,737,007
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              373,847<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 759,919
<INCOME-TAX>                    298,461
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             461,458
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    461,458
<EPS-BASIC>                     .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .26
<FN>
<F1> AMOUNT REPRESENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.
<F2> INCLUDES THE COST OF 726,166 OF COMMON SHARES IN TREASURY OF $2,257,342.
<F3> INCLUDES  INTEREST EXPENSE OF $386,856,  NET OF INTEREST INCOME OF $573 AND
OTHER INCOME OF $12,436.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20E0028. LONG et al. v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL et al.

Plaintiff-Appellee has filed an emergency motion asking this Court to dismiss

the appeal in the above-referenced case before it is docketed in this Court.

In this personal injury and wrongful death action, Plaintiff-Appellee moved for

summary judgment on issues of alternative causation for the decedent’s lung cancer.

On January 8, 2020, the trial court granted the motion. On February 3, 2020,

Defendant-Appellant filed a notice of appeal in the trial court without obtaining a

certificate of immediate review. Plaintiff-Appellee asks this Court to exercise its

inherent authority under Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b) to grant its motion to dismiss

the appeal to prevent Defendant-Appellant from “attempting an end run around the

processfor application for [interlocutory] appeal to avoid a March 9, 2020 trial date.”

Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b) states that we may issue emergency

orders or give such direction to the trial court as may be necessary to

preserve jurisdiction of an appeal or to prevent the contested issue from

becoming moot. This power shall be exercised sparingly. Generally, no

order shall be made or direction given in an appeal until it has been

docketed in this Court.

While Plaintiff-Appellee’s argument that Defendant-Appellant’s appeal should be

dismissed for failing to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures may have

merit, these arguments do not present a proper ground for the exercise of this Court’s

February 05, 2020
inherent authority. Moreover, asthis appeal has not been docketed, and action by this

Court is not needed to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction or to prevent a contested

issue from becoming moot, Plaintiff-Appellee’s emergency motion to dismiss

Defendant-Appellant’s appeal is hereby DENIED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/05/2020
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2132-2133]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-579]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

January 10, 2012.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following 
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, on or after the date of 
publication of this notice.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before February 13, 2012 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, or any other 
aspect of the information collection, including suggestion for reducing 
the burden, to (1) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office 
of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for Treasury, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503, or email 
at OIRA--Submission@

[[Page 2133]]

OMB.EOP.GOV and (2) Treasury PRA Clearance Officer, 1750 Pennsylvania 
Ave. NW., Suite 11020, Washington, DC 20220, or on-line at 
www.PRAComment.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the submission(s) may be 
obtained by calling (202) 927-5331, email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6333312223171106021016111a4d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ededccfcefafcebeffdfbfcf7a0e9e1f8">[email protected]</span></a>, or the 
entire information collection request maybe found at www.reginfo.gov.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0057.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Annual Letters--Certificate of Authority (A) and Admitted 
Reinsurer (B).
    Abstract: Annual letters sent to insurance companies providing 
surety bonds to protect the U.S. or companies providing reinsurance to 
the U.S. information needed for renewal of certified companies and 
their underwriting limitations, and of admitted reinsurers.
    Affected Public: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 13,555.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-579 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Eligha McFADDEN, Sr., Appellee.

No. 4-86-2287.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1987.

Robert A. Butterworth, Jr., Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Amy Lynn Diem, Asst. Atty. Gen.,. West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Thomas F. Ball, III, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the departure sentence imposed and remand for resentencing, either within the guidelines or supported by written reasons for departure. *State v. Jackson,*478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985).

HERSEY, C.J., GUNTHER, J., and RIVKIND, LEONARD, Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Nos.
333-151697, 333-116691, 333-14373, 333-25973, 333-62631, 333-34200, 333-61688,
333-64892, 333-102444, and 333-106197) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-152373 and
333-135945) on Form S-3 of North American Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) of
our report dated January 29, 2009 which includes an emphasis paragraph relating
to an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern,
relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements which appear in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of North American Scientific, Inc. for the year
ended October 31, 2008.




SINGER
LEWAK LLP


Los
Angeles, California


January
29, 2009
EXHIBIT 12.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert Scott, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,

summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 11, 2006



Robert Scott

By: /s/ "Robert Scott"

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





103
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 14 - 00084 - CV
EX PARTE YADIRA HINOJOSA On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C
- 0321 - 13 - C
JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, c oncludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adj udged against appell ee , Yadira Hinojosa

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 4, 2014
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2280 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Polyol R6405. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Polyol 

R6405. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYOL R6405. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.98 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Polyol R6405) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2280 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with Annual Report of Voyant International Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: April 8, 2008



| |                                                                                             
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ David R. Wells                                                                          
| | David R. Wells                                                                              
| | Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 10.9

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

November 21,
2003

Mr. George
Puig
1755 Eagle Trace Blvd. East
Coral Springs, FL 33071

Dear
George:

I
am pleased to present this offer of employment to join APAC Customer Services, Inc. ("APAC") as Executive Vice President, reporting to the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"). In
making this offer, APAC expects that you will comply with any lawful obligations that you may have with your current and/or former employer(s).

The
following terms will apply:

---

Page 2
November 21, 2003
Mr. George Puig

---

Page 3
November 21, 2003
Mr. George Puig

George,
we are excited about you joining APAC, and look forward to continuing our discussions. If you have any questions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

APAC
CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.



Theodore
G. Schwartz
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

SAS/js

| |  | ACCEPTED BY:   |         
| |  | -------------- | --------
| |  | /s/GEORGE PUIG | 11/21/03
| |  |               
| |  | George Puig    | (Date)  

---

Page 4
November 21, 2003
Mr. George Puig

CONFIDENTIAL SIDE LETTER

November 21,
2003

Mr. George
Puig
1755 Eagle Trace Blvd. East
Coral Springs, FL 33071

Reference:
Offer Letter of Employment Dated November 21, 2003

Dear
George:

This
agreement is intended to clarify and be part of your offer letter of employment dated November 21, 2003.

Accordingly:



Acknowledged
and Agreed to:

APAC
CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.

|/s/THEODORE G. SCHWARTZTheodore G. Schwartz
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  | /s/GEORGE PUIGGeorge Puig   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|                                                                                 |  | Date: 11/21/03Date: 11/21/03

---

QuickLinks
#### John Capehart, as Administrator of the Estate of Mary Gillette, Deceased, John Capehart individually, and William H. Buford, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. W. H. Milton, as Administrator of the Estate of Peter Gillette, Deceased, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, Division A,

June 21, 1905.)

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Jackson County; L. J. Beeves, Judge.

*D. L. McKinnon,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*Benj. 8. Liddon,*for Defendant in Error.

Decision

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.