alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Capstone comments to EPA Well Completion and Associated 

Gas Methane Reduction White Paper 

Please find attached a response from Capstone Turbine to the white paper "Oil and Natural Gas Sector Hydraulically 

Fractured Oil Well Completions and Associated Gas during Ongoing Production." Thank you for the opportunity to 

comment.

Bryan Stockton | Director of Government Relations

ML Strategies, LLC

701 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 900 | Washington, DC 20004

Direct: (202) 434­7480 | Fax: (202) 434­7400

E­mail: Bstockton@mlstrategies.com

Web: www.mlstrategies.com

https://mint

zmail.mint

A Consulting Affiliate of Mintz Levin

Stockton, Bryan <Bstockton@mlstrategies.com>

Fri 6/13/2014 4:48 PM

To:OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; 

Cc:Jen Derstine <jderstine@capstoneturbine.com>; 

 1 attachment

Capstone EPA Well Completion Methane Reduction White Paper comments.pdf; 

Capstone comments to EPA Well Completion and Associ... - OilandGas.Whitepapers Page 1 of 1

https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/ 8/26/2014
NO. SCWC-29516 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I In the Matter of the Application

of HAROLD KAINALU LONG CASTLE, to register and confirm title to land situate at Kailua, District of Koolaupoko, City and County of

Honolulu, State of Hawai# i. ESTRELLA S. IGARTA, Respondent/Petitioner-Appellee

vs. ANTHONY PAUL LOCRICCHIO and BARBARA MARIE LOCRICCHIO, husband and wife, Petitioners/Respondents-Appellants
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (APPLICATION NO. 754 (Land Court 07-0003)) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Acoba, J., for the court 1 ) The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on November 24, 2010 by Petitioners/Respondents-Appellants Anthony

1 Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and Acoba, JJ., and Circuit Judge Wilson for Duffy, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Chan, assigned due to a vacancy. Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29516 21-DEC-2010 01:55 PMPaul Locricchio and Barbara Marie Locricchio is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai# i, December 21, 2010.

FOR THE COURT: /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Associate Justice Anthony P. Locricchio pro se , and for petitioner/ respondent-appellant Barbara Marie Locricchio, on the application.

2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2160 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin, tertiary amine 

crosslinked polystyrene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exchange resin, 

tertiary amine crosslinked polystyrene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN, TERTIARY AMINE 

4 CROSSLINKED POLYSTYRENE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ion exchange resin, tertiary 

amine crosslinked polystyrene 

(CAS No. 68441–29–2) (provided for in subheading 

3914.00.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2160 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Elizabeth BROUSSARD v. Clovicier CREDEUR, et al.

No. 89-CC-1201.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 22, 1989.

In re Broussard, Elizabeth; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Acadia, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “G”, No. 59137; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CW89-0540.

Writ granted. Ruling of the district court is reversed. Relator’s motion and order to produce video tape is granted.

COLE, J., would deny the writ application.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

__________________________________________ ) SIERRA CLUB, ) Civil Action No. ) 1:12-cv-00705-CKK Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ROBERT PERCIASEPE, Acting Administrator, ) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________)

STIPULATION

On December 19, 2012, the Court entered a C onsent Decree (ECF 13) resolving the

claims asserted in this matter by Plaintiff Sierra Club against Defendant R obert Perciasepe, in his

official capacity as Acting Administrator of th e United States Environmental Protection Agency

(“EPA”). Paragraph 6 of the Consent Decree prov ides that the deadlines in Paragraphs 2 and 3

therein may be extended by written stipulati on executed by counsel for Sierra Club and EPA

with notice to the Court.

Pursuant to Paragraph 6, Sie rra Club and EPA stipulate that the deadline in Paragraph 2

of the Consent Decree sha ll be extended from May 31, 2013, to August 30, 2013.

SO AGREED:

FOR PLAINTIFF SIERRA CLUB /s/ Robert Ukeiley Law Office of Robert Ukeiley 507 Center Street Berea, KY 40403 Phone: (859) 986-5402 Fax: (866) 618-1017 rukeiley@igc.org

DATED: 5/15/13 Case 1:12-cv-00705-CKK Document 17 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 22 FOR DEFENDANT EPA IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division

/s/ Eileen T. McDonough Trial Attorney United States Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Environmental Defense Section P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044 Phone: (202) 514-3126 Fax: (202) 514-8865 eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov

DATED: 5/20/13

Of Counsel for Defendant:

KAYTRUE TING Office of the General Counsel U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Bldg., MC 2344A 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20460 Phone: (202) 564-6380 Fax: (202) 564-5603 ting.kaytrue@epa.gov

RICHARD H. BARTLEY Office of Regional Counsel, Region 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1445 Ross Avenue Suite 1200 Mail Code: 6RC Dallas, TX 75202-2733 Phone: (214) 665-8046 Fax: (214) 665-2172 bartley.richard@epa.gov Case 1:12-cv-00705-CKK Document 17 Filed 05/20/13 Page 2 of 2
# AGENDA

Tribal NSR Outreach/Consultation Conference Call

Wednesday May 4 , 2011

2 : 3 0 p.m.

– 3:30 p.m.

2 :30 p.m.

– 2:35 p.m. Welcome and Outreach Consultation Purpose

Laura McKelvey , Group Leader,

Community and Tribal Programs Group

2:35 p.m.

– 3:25 p.m. Tribal NSR Rule Update and Discussion

Tribal Leaders and Laura McKelvey

3:25 p.m.

– 3:3 0 p.m. Wrap

- up

Tribal Leaders and Laura M cKelvey



## P ar ticipating Tribes

• Forest County Potawatomi

• Fond d u Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Reservation

• Santee Sioux Nation
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2208 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2208

         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Dichlorobenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on p-Dichlorobenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. P-DICHLOROBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       p-Dichlorobenzene   2.90%        No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 106-46-                                                   31/2011.......
                          7) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2903.61.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10523 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LONNIE CHARLES SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:94-CV-21

- - - - - - - - - - May 18, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lonnie Charles Smith appeals the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal custody, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Smith has failed to argue all of the claims set forth in his original motion, thereby abandoning them on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). In his appeal brief, Smith argues claims that were not properly brought before the district court. We decline to review claims raised for the first time on appeal fromNo. 97-10523 -2- the denial of a § 2255 motion. See United States v. Cervantes , 132 F.3d 1106, 1109 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, these financial statements were not reviewed by our independent registered public accountants; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.
 
 
 Date: December 15, 2008
 
 
 /s/ Michael G. Wirtz
 Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

April 2, 2013

ERRATA

______________________ 

WILLIAM GRONER,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2012-7072

______________________ 

Decided April 1, 2013

Nonprecedential Order

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

Page 1, correct “Note: This disposition is nonprecedential”
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        | /s/                Anthony C. Pintsopoulos                Anthony                C. Pintsopoulos Principal                Financial OfficerJuly                28, 2006 |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Michael Ray FREEMAN.

No. 86-KK-2397.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Freeman, Michael Ray; applying for writ of review; Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 38045; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. K86-734.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. James JARVIS v. Warden DEES.

No. 89-KH-0007.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

In re Jarvis, James; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 09-88-979.

Denied. Moot. The district court has acted.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 19, 2011 

1012 

Order 

 

October 19, 2011 

143152 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143152 

 COA: 296183 

Genesee CC: 09-025483-FC 

ISADORE NIGEL DEAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of People v Vaughn (Docket No. 142627) is pending on appeal before this Court and 

that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for 

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the 

decision in that case.
# ATLANTIC BANCSHARES,
INC.

Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer  of  Atlantic  Bancshares,  Inc.  (the
"Company"), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:

|1. |  | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 13, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                       |  | Robert P. Trask           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer   

|Date:  August 13, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Michelle Monts  
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                       |  | Michelle Monts             
|                       |  | Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.19

                                 DESCRIPTION OF
             EGAMES, INC. 1999 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN


         On  November  18, 1998 the Board of  Directors  of eGames,  Inc.  ("the
Company")   approved  the  adoption  of  a   company-wide   Employee   Incentive
Compensation Plan (the "Plan").  The amount of incentive  compensation that each
Company  employee  was  eligible  to earn under the Plan was  contingent  on the
Company achieving certain net income  objectives.  Under the Plan, each employee
was  eligible to earn a specified  percentage  of the  employee's  total  annual
salary in incentive  compensation.  These percentages  ranged from 10% of annual
salary for  administrative  employees to 50% of the annual  salary for the Chief
Executive Officer.

         No bonuses were to be earned until the Company had earned net income of
at least $1,135,000 (the "Minimum Threshold") during the 1999 fiscal year, which
amount was equivalent to the net income earned in fiscal 1998. Upon reaching the
Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses  earned if the
Minimum  Threshold were achieved,  then 50% of the potential bonus to which each
employee was eligible  would be earned.  If net income of  $2,750,000  (the 100%
Threshold")  was earned during the 1999 fiscal year, plus the amount required to
pay the bonuses earned when that net income level had been  achieved,  then 100%
of the potential bonus to which each employee was eligible would be earned.

         If the  Company  earned net income  during  the 1999  fiscal  year that
exceeded  the  Minimum  Threshold,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses
earned,  then each  employee  would earn a bonus equal to the  percentage of the
potential  bonus to which they were eligible equal to the percentage of earnings
as measured  against the 100%  Threshold.  For  example,  if an employee  earned
$50,000  per year and was  eligible  to earn a bonus  equal to 10% of his or her
salary if the 100% Threshold were met, then that employee would be paid a $5,000
bonus if the 100%  Threshold  were met.  If the  Company  achieved  earnings  of
$2,063,000,  plus the amount  required to pay the bonuses  earned,  or an amount
equal to 75% of the 100%  Threshold,  then the  employee  would  earn a bonus of
$3,750.

         On the date of adoption of the Plan,  based on the number of  employees
of the Company and their  respective bonus  percentages,  the Company would have
been required to achieve pre-bonus  earnings of approximately  $1,311,000 during
the 1999  fiscal  year in order to earn the minimum  bonus  (50%).  There was no
maximum  incentive   compensation  level.  If  the  Company  exceeded  the  100%
Threshold,  then additional  incentive  compensation would be earned on a linear
basis.

         Any bonuses earned were to be paid  subsequent to the completion of the
1999 fiscal year's financial statement audit.
##### 



Exhibit
10.43
 Execution Version
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 6
 TO THE MASTER TELESERVICES AGREEMENT
 BETWEEN
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS
 AND
APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
    1.
    
    SCOPE OF AMENDMENTThe purpose of this Amendment is to establish Verizon Services Corp. as the contracting
party under the Agreement.2.
    
    AMENDMENT OF THE AGREEMENTThe following provisions are amended as follows:2.1
    
    The preamble to the Agreement is added to state as follows:Verizon Services Corp. (Verizon) is hereby substituted for and replaces Cellco
Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and all references to Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon
Wireless for all purposes and all matters arising, occurring or transpiring on or after the
Effective Date of this Amendment. The Parties understand and agree that this Amendment is not
an assumption agreement and that Verizon is not liable for obligations or liabilities of any
type or character occurring, arising or transpiring prior to the Effective Date of
this Amendment, unless otherwise stated herein.
 
  Page 1 of 6




---



##### 



Execution Version
 2.2
    
    Exhibit D, Rate Schedule, is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with a
new Exhibit D, Rate Schedule, attached hereto as Addendum A.3.
    
    EFFECT OF AMENDMENTThis Amendment is an integral part of the Agreement. Terms used herein which
are defined or specified in the Agreement shall have the meanings set forth
therein. If there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between a specific term
or condition of this Amendment and a specific term or condition of the
Agreement, the specific term or condition of this Amendment shall control.Except as amended
hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.4.
    
    SIGNATURESIN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be
executed by their duly authorized officers or representatives.
 Verizon Services Corp.
    
    
    
    APAC Customer Services, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Lenore Aguilar
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James McClenehanName: Lenore Aguilar
    
    
    
    Name: James McClenehanTitle: Sr. Consultant
    
    
    
    Title: SVP, SalesDate: 5-17-07
    
    
    
    Date: 4/3/07By:
    
    /s/ Larry RodmanName: Larry RodmanTitle: Group Vice PresidentDate: 4/3/07
 
  Page 2 of 6