alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Carlos RUBIO.

No. 87-KK-0344.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re South Central Insurance Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, mandamus and prohibition; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. *“J”,*No. 312-576; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-6252.

Denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jorge Estrada, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered January 20, 1989, convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Initially, we reject the People’s contention that this appeal should be dismissed because the defendant had absconded and was not amenable to the jurisdiction of the court at the time the notice of appeal was filed on his behalf. Several months after the notice of appeal was filed the sentence imposed was carried into execution. Since that time the defendant has been amenable to the jurisdiction of this court *(cf., Molinaro v New Jersey,*396 US 365; *People v Sullivan,*28 NY2d 900, *appeal reinstated*28 NY2d 992, *affd*29 NY2d 552), and has indicated a desire to pursue his appeal *(cf., People v Jinks,*140 AD2d 371). Thus, dismissal of the appeal would be inappropriate.

The defendant contends that the evidence adduced was legally and factually insufficient to support his conviction for attempted burglary in the second degree. We disagree. The defendant was observed on the second floor landing of a fire escape, outside a bedroom window which had been tampered with. The explanation he gave for his presence was highly implausible, and when ordered to leave the premises, he did so in a way which evidenced a consciousness of guilt. Viewing this evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant attempted to knowingly enter the complainant’s home unlawfully with intent to commit a crime therein *(see,*Penal Law § 140.25 [2]; § 110.00). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
NCER~, INC. 

Gneironmental Ceramic Technolouies 

3859 Battleground Ave Sufte 205, Greensboro, NC 27410 Tele No. (336) 288-7226, Fax (336) 288-5994 

Morin Brick 

Attn. Mr. Norm Davis 

Box 1510 

Auburn, ME 04211-1510 

kJ6 

( 

004V 

 / 

Date: 

Contact: 

Telephone: 

Fax: 

Our Project-No.: 

1st July, 2004 

Mr. Randol Kemp 

(336) 288-7226 

(336) 288-5994 

1468-03 R1 

kemprandol@aol.com 

Re.: Project Morin Brick 

Ohlmann Fluorine Adsorber System 

ENCERTEC Commercial Quotation No. 1468-03 R1 

Dear Mr. Davis, 

Please find following for your consideration our proposal for adding (1) Ohlmann Fluorine Adsorber System 

to your above referenced manufacturing facility: 

Quantity, Item, Description and Price 

1. One (1) Adsorber with 3.5 (95.5" x 113.5") cascades, complete with insulation and storage silo 

approx. 600 ft3; incl. Insulation; 1 Pressure Differential Monitoring System; 36-inch ID Duct from Adsorber to Exhaust Fan; 1 36-inch ID x 61' Exhaust Stack insulated with 4-inches insulation; 1 Exhaust Fan (22,000 CFM) 60 HP; 1 VFD for 60 HP Motor; 1 Pressure Control System for Exhaust 

Fan; Control Panel; 1 UPS Power Failure Prevention Device; Long Wear Elbows on Refill and Recycling Pipes (if required). 

2. Approx. 80' feet of duct from kiln exhaust to inlet of Adsorber. 

Including; approx. 70 feet of 36" ID duct with 4-inches of foil backed insulation located on the inside 

of the building, extending from the kiln to the building wall and approx. 10 feet of 36" ID duct with 4- 

inches of insulation and .032 embossed aluminum sheets for weather cover extending to the inlet 

cap of the Adsorber. The duct will include all (2) expansion joints, (3) 90-degree elbows, supports, 

hangers and mounting brackets. 

Adsorber Installed $550,860.00 

O tp ions: 

3. Limestone feeding system including hopper, pneumatic conveying system with three (3) elbows, and 

electrical controls for filling the storage silo. 

$ 30,655.00 

✓ 

- Page 1 -
EXHIBIT 32.1





WRITTEN STATEMENT


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, WenXiang Ding, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 19, 2011
By:
/s/ WenXiang DingName:
WenXiang DingTitle:
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  November 3, 2006







|                                                                                              | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                             
|/s/Peter Toscano                                                                              | 
|Peter Toscano                                                                                 | 
|(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors) | 
|                                                                                              |
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 6, 2011 Cedarburg Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
Schedule4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. Regarding the drug code (8333), the company plans to use this controlled substance to manufacture another controlled substance. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than March 19, 2012. Dated: January 6, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-656 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-2455

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Bruce W. Cox, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 13, 2001

Filed: November 23, 2001

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bruce W. Cox pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute

methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, and possession of a

firearm in relation to a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924. In the

plea agreement, Cox and the Government stipulated that in applying the Sentencing

Guidelines, “the amount of methamphetamine attributable to [Cox], including

relevant conduct, is at least 50 grams but less than 200 grams of a substance

containing a mixture of methamphetamine.” The presentence report repeated the

drug quantity stipulation, and Cox did not contest the presentence report’s facts. At
*

The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Western District of Missouri. 

-2-

sentencing, the district court*

 applied the statutory mandatory minimum sentence of

five years corresponding to the amount of methamphetamine specified in the plea

agreement and presentence report. 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(viii) (Supp. V 1999) (in

offense involving fifty grams or more of mixture containing methamphetamine,

defendant shall be sentenced to not less than five and not more than forty years). 

On appeal, Cox contends the district court could not convert the amount of

ephedrine seized into methamphetamine for the purpose of deciding whether his

offense involved at least fifty grams of methamphetamine. The district court

properly based drug quantity on Cox’s stipulation that his offense involved “at least

50 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine,” however. 

Cox also asserts that because the indictment did not specify drug quantity, his

sentence violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) (other than fact

of earlier conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the

prescribed statutory maximum must be charged in an indictment, submitted to a jury,

and proven beyond a reasonable doubt). Because Cox’s sentence is less than the

twenty-year maximum authorized in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) without regard to drug

quantity, Apprendi does not require Cox’s drug quantity to be charged in his

indictment. United States v. Aguayo-Delgado, 220 F.3d 926, 934 (8th Cir.), cert.

denied, 531 U.S. 1026 (2000). Cox acknowledges his argument is foreclosed by our

decision in Aguayo-Delgado and argues the case is wrongly decided, but one panel

of this court must follow the decision of other panels until overruled by the en banc

court. United States v. Ortega, 150 F.3d 937, 947 (8th Cir. 1998).

We thus affirm Cox’s sentence.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### Lascelles MURRAY v. TRUNKLINE GAS COMPANY, First Horizon Insurance Company, Performance Marine, Inc., the ABC Insurance Company and John Doe.

No. 89-C-1366.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 12, 1989.

In re Trunkline Gas Co.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 88CA-2014; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “H”, No. 86-21589.

Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 28.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby R. CLARK.

No. 88-KH-1812.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 14, 1988.

In re Clark, Bobby R.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the matter to the First Circuit Court of Appeal for its prompt consideration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Army announces that, unless there is objection, after 15 days it will grant an exclusive license to Triumph Actuation Systems—Connecticut, LLC, of Bloomfield, CT in U.S. patent 7,228,779, issued June 12, 2007, “Automatic Primer Feed Mechanism”; U.S. patent 7,246,549, issued July 24, 2007, “Automatic Primer Feed Mechanism; U.S. patent 7,318,369, issued January 15, 2008, “Out-of-Battery Lock for the Automatic Primer Feed Mechanism”; U.S. patent 7,845,264, issued December 7, 2010, “Automatic Primer Feed Mechanism”. Any license granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR Part 404.

# DATES:

File written objections by February 1, 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Timothy S. Ryan, Technology Transfer Program Manager, RDAR-EIB, U.S. Army ARDEC, Picatinny Arsenal, NJ 07806-5000, email:                         *timothy.s.ryan@us.army.mil;*                         (973) 724-7953.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Written objections must be filed within 15 days from publication date of this notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Any license granted shall comply with 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-648 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
Presidential Documents

15231 

Federal Register 

Vol. 77, No. 51 

Thursday, March 15, 2012 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of March 6, 2012 

Delegation of Responsibility Under the Senate Resolution of 

Advice and Consent to Ratification of the Treaty Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern 

Ireland Concerning Defense Trade Cooperation; and the Defense Trade Cooperation Treaties Implementation Act of 2010 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of 

the United States Code, I hereby delegate to you, in consultation with 

the heads of other executive departments and agencies, as appropriate: 

(1) the function of the President to make all certifications, reports, and 

notifications to the Congress prior to entry into force of the Treaty Between 

the Government of the United States of America and the Government of 

the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Concerning Defense Trade Cooperation, as well as to provide annual reports thereafter, 

consistent with section 2 of the Senate Resolution of Advice and Consent 

to Ratification of the Treaty, dated September 29, 2010; and 

(2) the responsibility of the President, under the Defense Trade Cooperation 

Treaties Implementation Act of 2010 (the ‘‘Act’’), to provide congressional 

notification of amendments to the Implementing Arrangements that are made 

pursuant to section 105(c) of the Act. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 6, 2012 

[FR Doc. 2012–6449 

Filed 3–14–12; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 63 (Monday, April 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 19747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6408]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[Order 2012-3-7; Docket DOT-OST-2012-0022]


Proposed Cancelation

    of the Air Taxi Authority Of VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc.
AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2012-3-7) Docket DOT-OST-
2012-0022.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding that VIH 
Cougar Helicopters, Inc. is not a U.S. citizen as defined in 49 U.S.C. 
40102(a)(15) and canceling its Part 298 exemption authority.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
April 2, 2012. .

ADDRESSES: Objections and answers to objections should be filed in 
Docket DOT-OST-2012-0022 and addressed to U.S. Department of 
Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, 
and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the 
order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier 
Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 
366-7785.

Susan L. Kurland,
Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-6408 Filed 3-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov, 

Cc: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, fellner.christian@epa.gov, johnson.mary@epa.gov 

Bcc:

Subject: EGU GHG NSPS - Submittal #1

From: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US - Tuesday 01/24/2012 04:51 PM

Cortney -

This is the first of several emails I'm going to send over tonight, which contains materials requested 

and/or discussed in recent phone conversations with OMB. Please let me/Kevin know if you have any 

questions.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D.

Leader, Energy Strategies Group

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01

RTP, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-1045

Cell: (919) 306-2290

Fax: (919) 541-5450

e-mail: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

*********************************************************

DRAFT/Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

*********************************************************

Sensitivities to Test Robustness of Assumptions about no Coal in Future Cases:

In follow up to questions from the interagency group, we have run several sensitivities. We looked at a 

higher demand case, a higher gas price case (because of less shale gas), a combined higher case. We

did not see coal in any of those cases in 2020. In the combined case, we did see some coal in 2030.

This did not result in annual costs in either 2020 or 2030 becuase there was no very little difference in the 

cost of a coal unit or gas unit in that time frame. It would only be in years past 2030 where there would 

be any cost.

We did not run a sensitivity looking at cases where there was no concern about CO2 emissions in the 

future (one of the cases when EIA did see more coal) becuase we do not believe that is a reasonable 

policy scenario. Similarly, we saw no substantiation for lower capital cost for coal units. We have also 

included a graphic that illustrates the cost of coal with the adder to represent uncertainty about CO2 

policy. You can see, that this shows that a gas price above $9.00 would be needed to support new coal.

Sensitivity Summary NSPS_1-23-12.pptx
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of By Design, Inc. (the Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I. Deanie J. Underwood, Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:November 18,
2009





By:
            /s/Deanie J. UnderwoodDeanie
      J. Underwood
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P.
(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008