alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Faulk, Scott (osn 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Jim & Sue Schelinski <molokaibluegoose@hawaii.rr.com> 

Thursday, November 28, 2013 1:35 AM 

EAS(OSD 

Keep on flying, Mokulele! 

-, 

Just a note to offer our support for your continued service to our island. As B&B operators, we have many customers who 

use your service. We have found as the rates became more affordable, our business experienced a boost both in 

increased international travelers and with local travelers as well. Of greatest importance to us here on Molokai is to have 

available and dependable service to tend to medical needs. That is probably the issue that causes our family to purchase 

more tickets to Oahu. We would also love to be able to fly directly to the Big Island to attend the LDS temple in Kana 

without having to fly to Oahu or Maui first. I'm sure there are many others in our congregation of 1200 people that would 

use that service more if it were available at a reasonable price. Right now it is almost easier for us to fly to Nevada or 

Seattle rather than fly to Kana. On an island, good air service and scheduling is everything! Our best to you in your 

efforts to run a successful business that includes Moldkai. 

Jim and Sue Schelinski 

Molokai Blue Goose 

10 f This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. 

1
AFS

- 14

- 1 27

- E February 24, 2014

Exemption No. 10553 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 2

- 05 44

M s

. Tracy McGinnis

Parent of Brendan McGinnis

5664 Kipling Parkway, Apartment 8

- 102

A rvada, C O 80002

Dear M s

. McGinnis :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10553. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received January 7, 2014 and February 18, 2014 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation

Administrat ion (FAA) on behalf of Brendan McGinnis for an extension of E xemption

No. 10553. That exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Cod e of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR) allow s Brendan to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation ) during use of

that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircr aft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishi ng a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exem ption would not set a

precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Brendan

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justifi cation for the issuance of Exemption No. 10 553

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Any air carrier or

commercial operator operating under part 121 while Brendan is aboard its aircraft is granted

an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow h im to use an FAA

approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Brendan ’s parents

or a caregiver accompanying h im

. Brendan McGinnis may only occupy a passenger seat with

no passenger se ated behind h im

. In addition, Brendan ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy

of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least

48 hours before the date of each fligh t.

This exemption terminates on February 28, 201 9 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Marshall Deshun Parker, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00237

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13

- 0334X ). Opinion deliver ed by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no reversible error in the judgment

of the court below

. However, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court ’ s judgment to delete the assessment of attorney fees. As
modified, w e affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Marshall Deshun Parker, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

REN DERED JUNE 4, 2015 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Broadwing Corporation



 Exhibit 4.7 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 
 FIRST: The name of this corporation shall be: Broadwing
Corporation. 
 SECOND: Its registered office in the State of Delaware is to be located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, in the City of
Wilmington, County of New Castle and its registered agent at such address is CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY. 
 THIRD: The purpose or purposes
of the corporation shall be: 
 To engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation
Law of Delaware. 
 FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which this corporation is authorized to issue is: 
 1,000 shares of common stock, par value $.0001 per share. 
 FIFTH: The Board of Directors shall have the power to adopt, amend or repeal the by-laws. 
 SIXTH: No
director shall be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of fiduciary duty by such director as a director. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a director shall be liable to the extent
provided by applicable law, (i) for breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law,
(iii) pursuant to Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. No amendment to or repeal of this Article Sixth shall apply to or have any
effect on the liability or alleged liability of any director of the Corporation for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such director occurring prior to such amendment.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 VENTURI PARTNERS, INC. AND AFFILIATES CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Venturi Partners, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 28, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Larry L. Enterline, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Larry L. Enterline

Larry L. Enterline
Chief Executive Officer
April 26, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Venturi Partners, Inc.
and will be retained by Venturi Partners, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTIANS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENES OF SYSTEMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          65,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,908
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               256,883
<PP&E>                                         130,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                (56,774)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 388,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,028,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,617,260
<COMMON>                                         12084
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,254,261)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   388,194
<SALES>                                      1,498,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,498,533
<CGS>                                          109,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,533,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               125,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             587,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,644,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (605,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,038,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                 988,400
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,050,174)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)


</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.11
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
As of October 1, 2020
The following table sets forth the annual base salaries, as of October 1, 2020, of the Named Executive Officers1 (the “NEOs”) of Franklin Resources, Inc. (the “Company”). 
	
					
	 
	October 1, 2020

	Name and Principal Positions 
	Annual Base Salary2

	Jennifer M. Johnson
President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$
	750,000
	


	Gregory E. Johnson
Executive Chairman and Chairman of the Board
	 
	$
	600,000
	


	Matthew Nicholls
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$
	525,000
	


	Craig S. Tyle
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
	 
	$
	525,000
	


	Jed A. Plafker
Executive Vice President
	 
	$
	525,000
	





The NEOs are also eligible to: 


Incentive Compensation3 


		
	(a)
	receive an annual cash incentive award pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (including Key Executive Pool) and/or the Company’s 2014 Key Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, each as amended and restated;




		
	(b)
	participate in the Company’s equity incentive program under which they may be granted restricted stock awards and/or restricted stock unit awards (including both time- and performance-based awards) pursuant to the Company’s 2002 Universal Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated; and




		
	(c)
	receive additional cash and/or equity awards for special recognition of significant contributions or for retention purposes (which may include time- and performance-based awards).




Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements 


		
	(a)
	participate in the Company’s broad-based benefit programs generally available to its salaried employees, including health, disability and life insurance programs, the Franklin Templeton 401(k) Retirement Plan and the Company’s 1998 Employee Stock Investment Plan, as amended and restated (the “ESIP”); provided that Ms. J. Johnson and Mr. G. Johnson may not participate in the ESIP pursuant to applicable rules; and




		
	(b)
	receive certain perquisites offered by the Company.




__________________________
		
	1 
	The NEOs listed herein are the Company’s current chief executive officer, current chief financial officer, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers of the Company as of September 30, 2019. Effective February 11, 2020, Ms. Johnson became Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Johnson became Executive Chairman.




		
	2 
	Effective October 1, 2020, the annual base salaries of the NEOs were restored following a prior 20% reduction to their annual base salary levels that took effect on April 13, 2020.




		
	3 
	Mr. Nicholls joined the Company in May 2019. Under the terms of his offer letter, Mr. Nicholls was eligible to earn a guaranteed annual incentive award of $2.6 million for fiscal year 2020, and has certain severance protections during the first two years of his employment.
Exhibit 32 (a)

                                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, Terry W. Shaver,
Chief Executive Officer of Abatix Corp. (the Company) has executed
this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report).

The undersigned certifies
that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.

| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/Terry W. Shaver                          
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Name: Terry W. Shaver                       
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | March 26, 2004                              
|
|
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                              AMENDED AND RESTATED

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                        Cabot Safety Holdings Corporation


         Cabot Safety Holdings Corporation, a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), pursuant to Section
242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "DGCL"), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY:

         FIRST: That the Board of Directors of Cabot Safety Holdings
Corporation, by unanimous agreement at a duly called meeting of the Board
validly held on May 27, 1996, in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
of the DGCL, duly adopted a resolution setting forth a proposed amendment to the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, declaring
such amendment to be advisable and directing that such amendment be submitted to
and be considered by the stockholders of the Corporation for approval. Such
resolution proposed to amend the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation as follows:


         Article FIRST of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
         of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
         follows:

                  "The name of the Corporation is Aearo Corporation."

         SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of
Directors, such proposed amendment to the Corporation's Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation at a duly called and
validly held meeting of stockholders, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the DGCL.




<PAGE>



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of
Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by
Mark V.B. Tremallo, its Vice President and Secretary, this 29th day of May,
1996, which signature constitutes the affirmation or acknowledgment of such
officer, under penalties of perjury, that this instrument is the act and deed of
the Corporation, and that the facts stated therein are true.



                       CABOT SAFETY HOLDINGS CORPORATION





                           By: /s/ Mark V.B. Tremallo

                               Mark V.B. Tremallo

                          Vice President and Secretary
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010
of Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick
      MontalbanChief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer





May 13,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                         EXHIBIT 10.4 (b)


           SECOND AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



     REFERENCE IS MADE to that certain Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement (the "Agreement"), made effective as of the 13th Day of
November, 1995 and first amended on December 6, 1996, between
Transderm Laboratories Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company") and the undersigned executive officer (the
"Optionee").

     The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

     A.   The Exercise Price is $.15 per share.

     B.   The Company and the Optionee agree that no additional
          options to purchase the Company's common stock will be
          issued to the Optionee during the term of the Option.

     C.   The Optionee will not exercise the Option before April
          4, 2000, unless there is a transaction in which the
          Company is acquired, in which case the number of Option
          Shares as to which the Option is exercisable will be
          limited to twenty (20%) percent of the total number of
          Option Shares for each year that has passed since April
          4, 1995, with part years to be pro-rated temporally.

     D.   All other terms, conditions and provisions of the
          Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed in their
          entirety.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Second Amendment to the aforementioned Stock Option Agreement to
be executed as of November 19, 1998.

                              Transderm Laboratories Corporation

                              By:   /s/ Murray Lieber
                              Title:   Vice President

                              Optionee:

                              By:  /s/ Robert D. Speiser
                              Robert D. Speiser
# Fixed Wing sUAS Check List

FWChameleon , Ultra Stick 120 and 25e

Revision date: 9/1/15Preflight

 Aircraft check

 Bolts

 Motor bolts

 Props hand tight

 Video wires

 Video transmitter

 Video antenna

 Data radio antenna

 Camera wires

 Lipo battery

(Check voltage over 12V)

 Aircraft transmitter set

 Mode switch manual

 Throttle idle

 Switches off

 Ch 7 Off

 Camera transmitter set

 Camera tilt down Site preflight Inspection

 Locate landing and take off points

 Locate forced landing points

 Define path of inspection flight

 Define hold points

 Define when pilot and VO will walk

to provide a better vantage point

 Pilot and VO are required to be in

agreement with the procedure and

path of flight 48

- 72 hrs NOTAM in place

24 hrs Charging and Testing

 Flight test aircraft and video system

 Operate in all modes and RTL

 Charge Lipo batteries

 Charge video monitor

 Charge camera

 Turn on transmitters and replace

batteries if below 9.8 V stable SUAS ProceduresStart up and flight

 Aircraft transmitter on

 (Voltage over 9.8V stable)

 Camera transmitter on

 (Voltage over 9.8V stable)

 Camera on

 Connect Lipo battery

 Place aircraft on flat surface

 Video monitor on

 (Video signal received)

 Aircraft self diagnostic (yellow light)

 Aircraft transmitter telemetry on

 (Signal strength good)

 (Aircraft battery over 12V)

 (Satellites acquiring)

 Aircraft transmitter

 Mode switch manual Green light

 Mode switch Semi

- Auto Green light

 Mode switch Auto Green or blue light

 Aircraft transmitter set to manual

 Aircraft safety switch activated (aircraft armed)

 Transmitter arm (Throttle lower right)

 Fly aircraft P, R, ALT control check in manual

 At 75 + ftLTR P, R, ALT control check back to manual

 Auto mode, fly aircraft to hold point and check drift

 Fly aircraft ready to switch in ALT or Manual modes

 (Warning GPS loss happens suddenly)

 (causing a fly away aircraft)

 Monitor voltage and signal strength

 Land aircraft at >10.8 volts Landing

 Fly aircraft to hold point and check

landing area

 20+ ft switch to Semi

- Auto or

manual

 Land aircraft

 Hold throttle at idle for 20 seconds

 Slow move throttle to lower left to

disarm

 Prop stop spinning select safety

switch on aircraft

 Disconnect Lipo battery

 Camera off

 Transmitters off, Video

screen/receiver off

 Remove propellers and store
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7322

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

KENNETH ROSHAUN REID, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (0:04-cr-00353-CMC-1; 0:13-cv-01943-CMC) 

Submitted: September 20, 2013 Decided: September 24, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kenneth Roshaun Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Jimmie 

Ewing, Mark C. Moore, William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant

United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Kenneth Roshaun Reid seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(West Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Reid has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED