alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on February 10, 2012, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ASTM International Standards (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between December 2011 and February 2012 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at                     *http://www.astm.org.*

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 5, 2011. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 9, 2012 (77 FR 1085).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-5599 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE;P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative.

# ACTION:

Notice of change to hearing date and due date for post-hearing comments.

# SUMMARY:

The date of the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review is changed to Thursday, March 29, 2012. Post-hearing comments are due Monday, April 16, 2012.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On February 21, 2012, a notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (77 FR 10034) announcing,                     *inter alia,*                     that the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review was scheduled for March 20, 2012 and post-hearing comments were due April 10, 2012. This notice changes the time and date of that hearing to 1 p.m., Thursday, March 29, 2012 and the due date for post-hearing comments to 5 p.m., Monday, April 16, 2012. The hearing will cover only the petitions for new products and CNL waivers that have been previously submitted and accepted for review in the 2011 GSP Annual Review. (See 76 FR 67531 and 77 FR 10034.)                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tameka Cooper, GSP Program, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20508. The telephone number is (202) 395-6971; the fax number is (202) 395-9674, and the email address is                         *Tameka_Cooper@ustr.eop.gov*.                    

William D. Jackson,

Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for the Generalized System of Preferences and Chair of the GSP Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2012-6454 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3190-W2-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2013

No. 04-13-00248-CV

IN RE NORTH EAST INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice 

Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On April 19, 2013, Relator North East Independent School District filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus. The court has determined Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on May 14, 2013.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of May, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2012-CI-17627, Alejandra Campista v. North East Independent School 

District, pending in the 37th Judicial Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Mery presiding. 

However, the record indicates the Honorable Laura Salinas, presiding judge of the 166th Judicial District Court, 

Bexar County, Texas presided over the hearing, but the order complained of was signed by the Honorable Solomon 

J. Casseb III, presiding judge of the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40692

MARTHA VELA WHIRLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

AMERICAN BRANDS INCORPORATED; ET AL 

Defendants, 

BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORP., Individually 

and as Successor by Merger to the American Tobacco Company; 

R J REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(C-97-CV-9)

March 2, 1998

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, DUHE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, and the briefs of

counsel, and having had the benefit of spirited argument by counsel

for all parties, we are unable to discern any error committed by

the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district
2

court is 

AFFIRMED.
PENSACDLA 

Bay Area Chamber of Commerce 

March 10,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-IH* 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve 

this application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely 

together to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL 

alliance will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, 

scheduling and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit 

from having three competitive air alliances to choose from. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Evon Emerson 

President/CEO 

cc: Dale Morris 

Melinda Crawford 

Kathy Cargile 

117 W. Garden Street • P.O. Box 550 • Pensacola, FL 32591-0550 

850-4384081 • Fax: 850438-6369 

www.pensacolachamber.com
Exhibit 11

EXHIBIT 11  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                          |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------- | - | -------------- | - | ------- | -
|                                                          |  | Three Months EndedMarch 31, |        
|(In thousands, except per share data)                     |  | 2009Post-merger             |         |   | 2008Pre-merger |  
|Basic and diluted numerator:                              |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|Income (loss) attributable to the Company  Common Shares |  | $                           | (87,880 | ) |                | $ | 88,783  | *
|Income attributable to the Company  Unvested Shares      |  |                             |        |   |                |   | 123     | *
|                                                          |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|Income (loss) attributable to the Company                 |  | $                           | (87,880 | ) |                | $ | 88,906  |  
|Denominator:                                              |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|Weighted average common shares  basic                    |  |                             | 355,331 |   |                |   | 355,079 | *
|Effect of dilutive securities:                            |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|Stock options and restricted stock                        |  |                             |        |   |                |   | 715     | *
|                                                          |  |                             |         |   |                |   |         |  
|Weighted average common shares  diluted                  |  |                             | 355,331 |   |                |   | 355,794 | *
|Net income (loss) per basic common share                  |  | $                           | (.25    | ) |                | $ | .25     | *
|Net income (loss) per diluted common share                |  | $                           | (.25    | ) |                | $ | .25     | *



|* | Reflects implementation of FSP EITF 03-6-1 Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. See Note 1 for
additional information.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Equity awards of 7.1 million and 3.1 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Marty Williams, Chief Executive Officer
and Presidentof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
September 29, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/ Marty
Williams
 Marty
Williams
 Chief
Executive Officer, President
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #15-2005 (A) L.P.
(the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
##### 



CRAY INC.
 PARENT & SUBSIDIARIES LIST
 Parent /Subsidiary Name
    
    Date Formed
    
    Country/State
    
    % OwnershipCray Inc.
    
    12/7/87
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    ParentCray Federal Inc.
    
    11/03/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    3/23/00
    
    Australia
    
    100%Cray Brazil, Inc.
    
    8/25/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Computadores do Brasil
Ltda.
    
    11/17/00
    
    Brazil
    
    99.9%Cray Canada (Washington), Inc.
    
    3/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Canada Corporation
    
    3/20/00
    
    Canada
    
    100%Cray China Limited
    
    8/7/00
    
    China
    
    100%Cray Computer Finland Oy
    
    6/20/00
    
    Finland
    
    100%Cray Computer SAS
    
    4/3/00
    
    France
    
    100%Cray Computer Deutschland GmbH
    
    3/31/00
    
    Germany
    
    100%Cray Supercomputers (Israel) Ltd.
    
    9/16/01
    
    Israel
    
    100%Cray Italy S.r.l.
    
    7/12/00
    
    Italy
    
    100%Cray Japan, Inc.
    
    3/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Korea, Inc.
    
    3/17/00
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray Netherlands B.V.
    
    6/23/00
    
    Netherlands
    
    100%Cray Computer South Africa
(Proprietary) Limited
    
    2/23/00
    
    South Africa
    
    100%Cray Computer Spain, S.L.
    
    3/30/00
    
    Spain
    
    100%Cray-Tera Sweden AB
    
    3/3/99
    
    Sweden
    
    100%Cray Computer GmbH
    
    4/5/00
    
    Switzerland
    
    100%Cray Taiwan, Inc.
    
    4/5/01
    
    U.S./Washington State
    
    100%Cray U.K. Limited
    
    3/7/00
    
    United Kingdom
    
    100%
#### The STATE BOND COMMISSION of the State of Louisiana v. ALL TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND CITIZENS OF the STATE of Louisiana and Non-Residents Owning Property or Subject to Taxation Therein, and All Other Persons Interested in or Affected in any way by the Issuance of Revenue Anticipation Notes of the State of Louisiana.

No. 87-CD-1741.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 22, 1987.

In re Louisiana State Bond Comm.; Louisiana St. Prop. Ownrs.; Louisiana St. Citizens; Scott, John W. — Other; Crane, Carl N. — Other; Donelon, James J. — Other; Forster, Garey James — Other; Gee, Terry W. — Other; Hand, Keman A. — Other; Lancaster, Charles D. Jr. — Other; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, mandamus, supervisory & remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 318281.

Writ granted. The parties are ordered to file briefs in this Court on or before July 29, 1987.
#### Delask PITTMAN v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0394.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 16, 1993.

Dale H. McDavitt, McComb, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., John R. Henry, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal No. 13563 from Judgment dated March 29,1991; Joe N. Pigott Ruling Judge, Pike County Circuit Court.

Before HAWKINS, C.J., and SULLIVAN and SMITH, JJ.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2292 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2292

             To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 2505.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 2505.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPA 2505.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      2-Oxepanone         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        polymer, 1-3-                                                      31/2011.......
                        isobenzofuranedio
                        ne terminated
                        (CAS No. 117985-
                        60-1) (provided
                        for in subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE LUIS MEDINA ALVARADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-16337

D.C. Nos. 3:08-cv-04557-CRB

3:01-cr-00419-CRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

Federal prisoner Jose Luis Medina Alvarado appeals pro se from the district

court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 habeas motion. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Alvarado contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing accurately

FILED

APR 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16337

to advise him of his potential sentence if he was to plead guilty. As the district

court noted, no plea offer was extended to Alvarado, and the sentence he received

was close to, if not identical to, the Guidelines sentence that would have resulted

from a plea. Accordingly, Alvarado cannot demonstrate prejudice because he has

failed to show that there was a reasonable probability that the result of the

proceeding would have been different. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S.

668, 693-94 (1984); see also United States v. Blaylock, 20 F.3d 1458, 1466-67 (9th

Cir. 1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that an

evidentiary hearing was not necessary to resolve this claim. See Frazer v. United

States, 18 F.3d 778, 781 (9th Cir. 1994). 

We construe Alvarado’s additional arguments as a motion to expand the

certificate of appealability. So construed, the motion is denied. See 9th Cir. R.

22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per

curiam).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14519]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5881]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9645-5]


Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection Advisory 
Committee (CHPAC)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of 
the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be 
held March 28 and 29 at Mount Vernon Place, 900 Massachusetts Avenue, 
Washington, DC. The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental 
Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to 
children's environmental health.

DATES: The Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee will meet 
March 28 and 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Mount Vernon Place, 900 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington, 
DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Berger, Office of Children's 
Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b292e392c2e3965262a393f232a0b2e3b2a652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afcdcaddc8cadd81c2cedddbc7ceefcadfce81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the 
public. No registration is required. Preliminary agenda includes 
discussion of an advice letters on lead regulations, social 
determinants of health and children's environmental health, and EPA's 
Risk Assessment Forum and children's health projects. The full agenda 
will be posted at www.epa.gov/children.
    Access: For information on access or services for individuals with 
disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-564-2191 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bcded9cedbd9ce92d1ddcec8d4ddfcd9ccdd92dbd3ca"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb9bea9bcbea9f5b6baa9afb3ba9bbeabbaf5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 21, 2012.
Martha Berger,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2012-5881 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>