alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3322-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per 
35: Compliance Filing per the November 4, 2011 Order in Docket ER11-
3322 to be effective 11/7/2011.
    Filed Date: 1/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120105-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/17/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4717-001.
    Applicants: International Paper Company.
    Description: IP Baseline eTariff--Clone to be effective 9/30/2011.
    Filed Date: 1/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120105-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/26/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-763-000.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.
    Description: Tariff Filing--IA and FA between DEO and OVEC to be 
effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120105-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/26/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-764-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Power & Light Company.
    Description: Carolina Power & Light Company submits tariff filing 
per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): Rate Schedule No. 180 of Carolina Power and Light 
Company to be effective 1/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120105-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/26/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-765-000.
    Applicants: RC Cape May Holdings, LLC.
    Description: RC Cape May Holdings, LLC submits tariff filing per 
35.13(a)(2)(iii): Update to Category Seller Designation to be effective 
1/5/2012.
    Filed Date: 1/5/12.
    Accession Number: 20120105-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/26/12.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 5, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-643 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### DELTA BRANDS, INC., Appellant, v. HESCO SALES, INC., Appellee.

Nos. 85-2747, 85-2888 and 86-722.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 25, 1986.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1987.

Alan J. Kluger and Steven I. Peretz, Miami, for appellant.

Eliot R. Weitzman, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final order enforcing a settlement agreement in a breach of contract action involving the sale of a steel cutting machine. We affirm.

Extensive briefs have been filed by the parties and numerous points on appeal have been raised by the appellant Delta Brands, Inc. Without analyzing these points in any depth, suffice it to say that there was substantial, competent evidence presented below to support the trial court’s findings that (a) the appellant Delta Brands, Inc. breached the settlement agreement, by specifically repudiating it, (b) the appellee Hesco Sales, Inc. committed no material breach of the settlement agreement, and (c) Hesco Sales, Inc. had the ability to perform.its obligations under the settlement agreement when the appellant Delta Brands, Inc. repudiated the said agreement. We have not overlooked the appellant’s extensive arguments to the contrary, but do not find them persuasive. Moreover, we conclude that the remedy fashioned by the trial court to specifically enforce the settlement agreement herein was entirely appropriate in this cause under the established law; we reject appellant’s extensive arguments to the contrary. *See Robbie v. City of Miami,*469 So.2d 1384, 1385 (Fla.1985); *Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald,*321 So.2d 628, 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), *appeal dismissed,*327 So.2d 31 (Fla.1976); *Mangus v. Porter,*276 So.2d 250, 251 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA), *cert. denied,*279 So.2d 881 (Fla.1973); *Hogan v. Norfleet,*113 So.2d 437, 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1959), *aff'd,*143 So.2d 384 (Fla.1962).

Based on the foregoing reasons, the final order under review is, in all respects,

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
              Richard A. RappaportRichard
                  A. Rappaport
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                May
                  12, 2006
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2018 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain organic pigments 

and dyes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

organic pigments and dyes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ORGANIC PIGMENTS AND DYES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain organic pigments and dyes) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to goods entered, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2018 IS

1 or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2332 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2332

     To suspend temporarily the duty on porous hollow filaments of 
                 perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) copolymer resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on porous hollow filaments of 
                 perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) copolymer resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POROUS HOLLOW FILAMENTS OF PERFLUOROALKOXY (PFA) COPOLYMER 
              RESIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Porous hollow       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          filaments of                                                       31/2011.......
                          perfluoroalkoxy
                          (PFA) copolymer
                          resin, the
                          foregoing
                          certified by the
                          importer as
                          having pore sizes
                          of less than 0.05
                          microns and with
                          a maximum fiber
                          diameter of 1 mm
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5404.19.80.......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2376 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain dimming ballasts for fluorescent 

lighting. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. VOINOVICH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain dimming ballasts 

for fluorescent lighting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DIMMING BALLASTS FOR FLUORES4 CENT LIGHTING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Electronic ballasts capable of 

allowing the dimming of fluorescent discharge lamps or 

tubes (provided for in subheading 8504.10.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2376 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### William L. McRAE v. John M. MAMOULIDES, District Attorney, Jefferson Parish.

No. 89-CP-0013.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re McRae, William L.;—Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory, remedial and mandamus; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “0”, No. 344-356; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 88-KH-0857.

Denied.
EXHIBIT 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

TransCentra, Inc.

We have examined managements assertion for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that TransCentra, Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and Item 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the
Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including
tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities
related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2014, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Porter Keadle Moore, LLC

January 30, 2015

235 Peachtree Street NE |
Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222
##### 



EXHIBIT 24 POWER OF ATTORNEY Each director and/or officer of CheckFree Corporation (the Corporation)
whose signature appears below hereby appoints Peter J. Kight, David E. Mangum,
and Curtis A. Loveland as the undersigneds attorneys or any of them
individually as the undersigneds attorney, to sign, in the undersigneds name
and behalf and in any and all capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission), the
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Form 10-K) for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2004, and likewise to sign and file with the Commission any and
all amendments to the Form 10-K, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such
persons as its attorneys-in-fact and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with
like authority to sign and file the Form 10-K and any amendments thereto
granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and
revocation, and hereby ratifying all that any such attorney-in-fact or the
undersigneds substitute may do by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands this 3rd day of
September, 2004. Signature
    
    Title/s/ Peter J. Kight
Peter J. Kight
    
    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ David E. Mangum
David E. Mangum
    
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)/s/ John J. Browne, Jr.
John J. Browne, Jr.
    
    Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)/s/ William P. Boardman
William P. Boardman
    
    Director/s/ James D. Dixon
James D. Dixon
    
    Director/s/ Mark A. Johnson
Mark A. Johnson
    
    Director/s/ Lewis C. Levin
Lewis C. Levin
    
    Director/s/ Eugene F. Quinn
Eugene F. Quinn
    
    Director/s/ Jeffrey M. Wilkins
Jeffrey M. Wilkins
    
    Director
#### Thomas F.B. PLANT, Appellant, v. Myrna PLANT, Appellee.

No. 86-1101.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1987.

Blaire & Cole and Carol M. Sandy and Bonnie Blaire, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Marks, Aronovitz & Leinoff and Andrew Leinoff, Miami, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no merit in any of the points raised by appellant, we affirm the trial court’s Order on Pending Motions.1*Bowen v. Bowen,*471 So.2d 1274 (Fla.1985); *Brown v. Brown,*484 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 4th *45DCA 1986); *Massey v. Massey,*443 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); *Holmes v. Holmes,*384 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); *Albert v. Albert,*186 So.2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); *see Martinez v. Martinez,*383 So.2d 1153, 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (ambiguities in support provisions of settlement agreement are interpreted according to the best interests of the children involved).

We reverse, however, that portion of the Order denying the wife’s motion for modification of child support for the parties’ son Wade, who reached the age of eighteen prior to completing high school, and remand the cause for the trial court to determine whether Wade was a dependent person entitled to support within the meaning of section 743.07(2), Florida Statutes (1983).2*See Evans v. Evans,*456 So.2d 956 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); *cf. Stultz v. Stultz,*504 So.2d 5 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); *Keenan v. Keenan,*440 So.2d 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983) *(en*banc).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

1

. We consider paragraph D of the Order as referring to alimony and support rather than *45custody.

2

. Section 743.07, Fla.Stat. (1983), states:

> 743.07 Rights, privileges, and obligations of persons 18 years of age or older.—

> (1) The disability of nonage is hereby removed for all persons in this state who are 18 years of age or older, and they shall enjoy and suffer the rights, privileges, and obligations of all persons 21 years of age or older except as otherwise excluded by the State Constitution immediately preceding the effective date of this section and except as otherwise provided in the Beverage Law.

> (2) This section shall not prohibit any court of competent jurisdiction from requiring support for a dependent person beyond the age of 18 years; and any crippled child as defined in chapter 391 shall receive benefits under the provisions of said chapter until age 21, the provisions of this section to the contrary notwithstanding.
# BANKGREENVILLE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION

# Exhibit 32          
Section 1350
Certifications

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of BankGreenville Financial Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                    |  |                              
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                    |  |                              
|Date:  May 13, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Russel T. Williams
|                    |  | Russel T. Williams           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer      

|                    |  |                         
|------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                    |  |                         
|Date:  May 13, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Paula S. King
|                    |  | Paula S. King           
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jon Suk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mystica Candle
     Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer