alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2256

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Uniconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Uniconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNICONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Uniconazole) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 30, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0147. JIMMY CHATMAN v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU2020CR443
Exhibit 31.2    CERTIFICATION   I, James W. FitzGibbons, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  May 21, 2007    /s/James W. FitzGibbonsJames W. FitzGibbons Controller and Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### PLYMOUTH UNITED SAVINGS BANK, Appellant, v. BANK OF NASHUA.

No. 11556.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1939.

Wilson, Bundschu & Bailey, of Kansas City, Mo., and Paul W. Voorhies, of Detroit, Mich,, for appellant.

Ryland, Stinson, Mag & Thomson and Robert E. Rosenwald, all of Kansas City, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed with prejudice, at the costs of appellant, but without the taxation of any costs in favor of appellee in this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP12-346-000]


PostRock KPC Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Technical Conference

    Take notice that the Commission will convene a technical conference 
on Tuesday, March 27, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. (EDT), in a room to be 
designated at the offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
888 First Street NE., Washington DC 20426.
    The technical conference will address all aspects of PostRock KPC 
Pipeline, LLC's (KPC) proposed tariff revisions to be part of its FERC 
Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1. The proposed revisions would 
allow KPC to consider blending and pairing arrangements when deciding 
whether to exercise discretion under the tariff to accept receipts that 
fail to meet applicable gas quality specifications, as discussed in the 
Commission's Order issued on February 29, 2012.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ PostRock KPC Pipeline, LLC, 138 FERC ] 61,146 (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please 
send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#046567676177776d666d686d707d44626176672a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c8cacaccdadac0cbc0c5c0ddd0e9cfccdbca87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or 202-502-8659 (TTY), or send a fax to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    All interested persons are permitted to attend. For further 
information please contact Jenifer Lucas at (202) 502-8362 or email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fbf4fff8f7f4e3bffde4f2f0e2d1f7f4e3f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ddb7b8b3b4bbb8aff3b1a8bebcae9dbbb8afbef3bab2ab">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5972 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AFS-12-084-E December 16, 2011

Exemption No. 10411 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8750

Mr. Estel Breeding, Jr. Director, Credentialing Programs and Co-Chair, JSAMTCC Community College of the Air Force

100 South Turner Boulevard Maxwell-Gunter AFB, AL 36114

Dear Mr. Breeding:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8251, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 12, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Community College of the Air Force (CCAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 8251, as amended. That exemption from § 147.31(c)(2)(iii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows CCAF to permit U.S. Air Force aviation maintenance technicians who have completed military aviation maintenance training courses to be evaluated using the same

criteria used for the civilian sector.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to CCAF.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8251, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest.2

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 8251, as amended, to February 28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8251, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8251.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
**POWER      OF ATTORNEY**

|  Name                                                                             |  Title                                       |  Date                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
| /s/                WILSON W. S. LI                 Wilson                W. S. Li | Director                                          | September                13, 2007 |
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
| /s/                BILLY Y N WANG                 Billy                Y N Wang   | Chairman                of the Board of Directors | September                13, 2007 |
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
| /s/                GEOFFREY WEI                 Geoffrey                Wei       | Director                                          | September                13, 2007 |
|                                                                                   |                                              |                              |
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2131 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2131

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pentaerythritol 
                  tetrakis[3-(dodecylthio)propionate].

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Corker (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pentaerythritol 
                  tetrakis[3-(dodecylthio)propionate].

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PENTAERYTHRITOL TETRAKIS[3-(DODECYLTHIO)PROPIONATE].

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to pentaerythritol tetrakis[3-
(dodecylthio)propionate]) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL S ERVICES AIR RESOURCES DIVISION CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE NOTICE OF PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD AND PUBLIC HEARING In accordance with New Hampshire Administrative Rule, Env-A 204.01(b) and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Section 51.102, notice is hereby given that the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Air Resources Division (the Department) has prepared, and intends to submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, a revision to New Hampshire's State Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet the requirements of the federal Clean Air Act, section 169A, pertaining to visibility protection for Federal Class I Areas. The federal requirements that New Hampshire and other states must meet are contained in Title 40: Protection of Environment, Part 51 - Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans, Subpart P - Protection of Visibility (40 CFR 51.300- 309). These regulations, often referred to as the Regional Haze Rule, seek to address the combined visibility impacts at Federal Class I Areas caused by various air pollution sources over a large geographic region. New Hampshire's SIP revision provides a plan consistent with the national goal of restoring natural visibility conditions to Federal Class I Areas by 2064. Components of the plan include an assessment of baseline and natural visibility conditions, an air monitoring strategy, analyses for Best Available Retrofit Technology, a set of reasonable progress visibility goals, and a long-term strategy for achieving those goals. The Department hereby solicits comment on this SIP revision and offers the public the opportunity to request a public hearing on this SIP revision. Comments or requests for a public hearing must be submitted in writing or by email to Charles Martone, Air Resources Division, NH Department of Environmental Services, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095; email Charles.Martone@des.nh.gov. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, June 24, 2009, in Room 110-111 at 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03301. If no request for a public hearing is received by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, June 22, 2009, the Director will cancel the hearing by posting a notice on the Department's website at http://www.des.nh.gov (search for "Regional Haze"). Members of the public may call 603-271-1370 to find out whether the hearing has been cancelled. All comments on the proposed SIP revision must be received by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, June 26, 2009, to be entered into the record. A copy of the SIP revision, with attachments, is available for public inspection at the Department's offices at 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH, during regular working hours from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. The main text of the SIP revision, without attachments, may be downloaded from the Department's website at http://des.nh.gov , as above. Robert R. Scott Director, Air Resources Division NH Department of Environmental Services Dated: May 22, 2009

Appeared in: The Union Leader on Monday, 05/25/2009
#### J.P. MORGAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 7, 1989.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Craig S. Barnard, Chief Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Heilman, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Finding that the allegations contained in appellant’s motion for relief under rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, are facially insufficient to warrant consideration under *Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm the trial court’s denial of that motion.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER, J., concur.

STONE, J., dissents without opinion.
Order Granting Appellee’s Unopposed Motion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

INGE and MARK CAHILL, RANDY 

and KERIN GAYNER, WILLIAM 

and NANNETTE REED, and 

IRVING ERICKSON,

 Petitioners and Appellants,

v.

CITY OF COLUMBIA FALLS, 

COLUMBIA FALLS BOARD OF 

ADJUSTMENT,

 Respondents and Appellees,

and

CNS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, 

LLC, a Montana Limited Liability 

Company,

 Respondent.

Cause No. DA-22-0395

ORDER 

Having read and considered the joint, Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines 

and there appearing good cause therefore, the Motion is hereby GRANTED.

Appellees’ response brief is due November 30, 2022, and Appellants’ reply 

brief is due January 2, 2023.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 24 2022

10/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0395
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - [OMB Control No. 3090-0252; Correction; Information Collection; Docket 2012-0001, Sequence 6]

# AGENCY:

General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document contains a correction to the information collection notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         at 77 FR 9658 on February 17, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

The Regulatory Secretariat, at 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417, or (202) 501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090-0252, Preparation, Submission, and Negotiation of Subcontracting Plans; Correction.

## Correction

In the information collection document appearing at 77 FR 9658 on February 17, 2012, on page 9658, second column, paragraph 2, line 12, the figures “$500,000 (1,000,000)” is corrected to read “$650,000 (1,500,000)”.

Dated: March 2, 2012

Mindy S. Connolly,

Chief Acquisition Officer, U.S. General Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 2012-5607 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-61-P
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2085 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2085

          To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on THV.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on THV.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.62 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to THV) is amended by striking 
the date in the effective column period and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Guy N. Ducharme, Appellant, v Compagnies D’Assurances Du Groupe Drouot et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered April 5, 1990, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff, who was the president, CEO, and a major stockholder of Windsor Life Insurance Company of America ("Windsor”), a domestic life insurance company, and defendant Compagnies D’Assurances Du Groupe Drouot ("Groupe Drouot”), entered into a ten-year agreement in anticipation of Group Drouot’s acquisition of a controlling interest in Windsor. The agreement contained a stock buy-back provision obligating Groupe Drouot to purchase the plaintiff's shares in Windsor at a premium price over the prevailing market price in the event his employment was terminated at any time during the ten year term of the agreement. The Insurance Department rejected the proposed purchase, in part based on its conclusion that the agreement violated various provisions of the Insurance Law. A revised agreement of sale and proxy *218statement was thereafter submitted for approval after deletion of any reference to the agreement. With these deletions the acquisition was approved. Plaintiff remained as president of Windsor after that date but was thereafter terminated. When he sought to compel Groupe Drouot to purchase his stock pursuant to the agreement, Groupe Drouot refused and this action ensued.

The IAS court, dismissed the complaint, finding that the agreement violated Insurance Law §§ 214 and 69-i, and holding that the stock buy-back was additional compensation prohibited by the statute. We agree.

Insurance Law § 214 (now § 4230), prohibits insurance companies from entering into agreements providing officers with compensation that would extend beyond a period of one year for services to such companies, and no officer who is paid a salary for services, shall receive additional compensation, either directly or indirectly. The stock buy-back provision set forth in the agreement constitutes such indirect compensation. The agreement also violates section 69-i (now § 1509) which prohibits holding companies from entering into agreements in violation of section 214. The IAS court properly accorded great weight to the determination of the Insurance Department that the agreement was in violation of the statute *(see, Garfield v Equitable Life Assur. Socy.,*7 Misc 2d 419, *mot to dismiss appeal granted*4 AD2d 863). The contract, made in violation of the statute, is void and unenforceable *(see, Weir Metro Ambu-Service v Turner,*57 NY2d 911). Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.