alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Settlement
      agreement

    


    


    Party
      A:
      China Construction bank Shanghai Yangpu branch

    Party
      B:
      Shanghai wanxing Bio-pharmaceutical Co. Ltd

     

    After
      discussion between Party A and Party B, both parties has made a settlement
      agreement regarding returning the loan principle RMB30,000,000 and interest
      to
      Party A. the following is the settlement agreement.

    


    
      	1.  	
              As
                at Oct 21, 2006, Party B has returned loan principle RMB2,500,000
                to Party
                A. there is principle of RMB27,500,000 and interest RMB4,163,010.03
                which
                have not yet paid. (cut-off day is Oct 21,
                2006)

            


    

    


    
      	2.  	
              Party
                B is supposed to pay principle of RMB6 million the end of Oct, 2006
                and
                pay principle RMB7 million the end of April, 2007; at the end of
                August
                2007, Party B should pay RMB7 million. The rest of 7.5 million and
                interest need to be paid before the end of December 2007.
                

            


    

     

    
      	3.  	
              During
                the term of returning the loan, the interest should still be calculated
                for unpaid loan until the loan gets totally
                paid.

            


    

    


    
      	4.  	
              If
                Party B fails to pay back the loan based on above settlement, Party
                A has
                right to ask Shanghai Yangpu court to force Party B to perform the
                obligation or sell the Party B’s pledged land or house property through
                auction in accordance with the legal procedure, where money obtained
                shall
                pay the debt first. 

            


    

    


    
      	5.  	
              This
                settlement agreement is in 3 copies, party A & B and Yangpu court each
                has one copy.

            


    

     

    Stamp
      of
      both parties.

    


    Date:
      Oct
      24, 2006
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906**

 

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

 

Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofEmergency Medical Services Corporation, as general partner of Emergency MedicalServices L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Company”), each herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)               theForm 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010,filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)              the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ William A. Sanger                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                                                                                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                          |
|   | Emergency Medical Services  Corporation, as  general partner of Emergency Medical  Services L.P. |
|   | August 5, 2010                                                                              |
|   |                                                                                             |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                                                                               |
|   | Randel G. Owen                                                                                   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                          |
|   | Emergency Medical Services  Corporation, as  general partner of Emergency Medical  Services L.P. |
|   | August 5, 2010                                                                              |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-97538) pertaining to the Accom, Inc. 1995 Stock Option/Stock Issuance
Plan and the Accom,  Inc.  Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan of our reports  dated
October 29, 1996, with respect to the consolidated  financial statements and the
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Accom, Inc.




                                                 Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
December 20,1996
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2306 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment used for working iron or steel. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

manufacturing equipment used for working iron or steel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT USED 

4 FOR WORKING IRON OR STEEL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.83 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain manufacturing equipment used for working iron 

8 or steel) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

9 column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2306 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### HECTOR TURF & GARDEN, INC., Appellant, v. CALUSA GOLF, INC., Appellee. CALUSA GOLF, INC., Appellant, v. TORO COMPANY, Appellee.

Nos. 85-2867, 86-15.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

March 17, 1987.

Britton, Schantz & Schatzman and John L. Britton, Miami, for appellant Hector, Ligman, Martin, Shiley, Neswiacheny & Evans and Gordon Evans, Coral Gables, for appellee Toro.

Siegfried, Kipnis & Rivera and Steven Siegfried and Samuel C. Reiner, Coral Gables, for appellee/appellant Calusa.

Before HUBBART, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The order granting a new trial upon motion of the defendant Calusa Golf, Inc. [her-einfater “Calusa”] as to the claims and counterclaims between the plaintiff Hector Turf & Garden, Inc. [hereinafter “Hector”] and the defendant Calusa is affirmed upon a holding that no abuse of discretion has been shown sufficient to upset this order. We have carefully examined the plaintiff Hector’s extensive arguments to the contrary, but are not persuaded thereby. *See Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Farish,*464 So.2d 530, 533 (Fla.1985); *Castlewood Int’l Corp. v. LaFleur,*322 So.2d 520 (Fla.1975); *Cloud v. Fallis,*110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); *Blancher v. Metropolitan Dade County,*436 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We also find no merit in the third party defendant Toro Company’s [hereinafter “Toro”] appeal, as no error has been shown in the trial court’s refusal to direct a verdict in Toro’s favor on the defendant Calusa’s claim against Toro. *See Smith v. Burdine’s, Inc.,*144 Fla. 500, 198 So. 223 (1940); *R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman,*470 So.2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), *pet. for review dismissed,*482 So.2d 348 (Fla.1986); *Fincher Investigative Agency v. Scott,*394 So.2d 559 (Fla. 3d DCA), *pet. for review denied,*402 So.2d 609 (Fla.1981). We do find merit, however, in Calusa’s appeal from the trial court’s sua sponte order granting a new trial on Calusa’s claim against Toro, as the order granting same fails to state any valid grounds therefor. It relies solely on grounds stated in its prior order granting a new trial to Calu-sa on Hector’s claim against Calusa, and these grounds present no basis for a new trial on Calusa’s claim against Toro. *See Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell,*384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); *Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty,*359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); *Gould v. National Bank of Florida,*421 So.2d 798 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *White v. Martinez,*359 So.2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

The order granting a new trial on the claims and counterclaims between the plaintiff Hector and the defendant Calusa is affirmed; the order granting a new trial on the defendant Calusa’s claim against the third party defendant Toro is reversed; the final judgment entered in favor of the defendant Calusa on Calusa’s claim against the third party defendant Toro is affirmed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
#### In the Matter of James Stoll, Petitioner, v Thomas A. Coughlin III, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Although petitioner contended that he was attacked by another inmate with a weapon, the fact that the weapon (a razor blade) was found in his cell gave rise to an inference of impropriety *(see, Matter of Hernandez v LeFevre,*150 AD2d 954, *lv denied 74*NY2d 615). This is true even though others may have had access to petitioner’s cell *(see, Matter of Caldwell v Coughlin,*148 AD2d 905). Therefore, petitioner’s denial of any knowledge of the weapon merely created an issue of credibility to be resolved by respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services *(see, supra).*Considering the record in its entirety, the determination that petitioner was guilty of possessing a weapon was based upon substantial evidence and should be upheld *(see, Matter of Pike v Coughlin,*78 AD2d 937).

Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.
### Re: owosso graphic arts 

## LI Christopher Lambesis to: Kathy Wilson Cc: Todd Ramaly, "'Terri Zick'" 03/31/2010 10:03 AM

From: Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US To: "Kathy Wilson" <kathywilson@owossographic.com > Cc: Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, "'Terri Zick'" <tzick@cticompanies.com >
We hope you can give us a few more details regarding the NMP results.
We're looking for the following: 1) A quick narrative describing the sampling of the raw product and the filter cake . 2) A correction or explanation of the analytical report describing the raw product as "Liquid Waste." 3) A correction or explanation of the units in the raw product analytical report (mg/kg or mg/L). 4) A correction or explanation of the dilution factor in the raw product analytical report . 5) A copy of the chromatograms and outputs.

Thanks.

ChristLambesisbesis Environmental Scientist U.S EPA Region 5 Land and Chemicals Division (312) 886-3583
"Kathy Wilson" Mr Larnbesis 03/30/2010 04:09:50 PM

From: To: Cc: Date: Subject: "Kathy Wilson" <kathywilson@owossographic.com >

Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, "'Terri Zick'" <tzick@cticompanies.com > 03/30/2010 04:09 PM owosso graphic arts



### Mr. LambesisWe received the data from the most recent sampling of the wastewater treatment sludge generated at Owosso Graphic Arts and a copy is provided here for your use. We look forward to discussing the remaining issues associated with the petition after you have an opportunity to evaluate the attached data.

KathySinceon 

### President Owosso Graphic Arts, Inc. 800.444.5552 Fax: 989.723.5399 www.owossogrhic.com

Please consider the environment before cracking open that bottle of water! Quality, Speed, Competitive, Friendly Service, Community—THE TOTAL PACKAGE We're America's largest maker of brass, copper & magnesium dies, offering the Total Package. Sinte we started in 1949 our commitment to craftsmanship hasassured our customers the highest quality with the quickest turn-around. We offer competitive prices, packaged with a smile, from a company well established in

its community--both local and nationwide. Use our dies for many applications, including: Thermal Kiss Cutting (one-piece dies up to 30" x 120"); Foil Stamping; Debossing; Combination; Sculptured Embossing; Paper Embossing; Intaglio; Membrane Switch Overlay Embossing; Rubber Stamp Masters; Many Custom Applications 

### [attachment "1003151.pdf' deleted by Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1239-000]


Crofton Bluffs Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Crofton Bluffs Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 2, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#02444750414d6c6e6b6c67517772726d707642646770612c656d74"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fabcbfa8b9b5949693949fa98f8a8a95888eba9c9f8899d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6508 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### James I. D. STRAUS, as Trustee, Appellant, v. CINDERELLA THEATRE COMPANY, Inc., Appellee.

No. 8145.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1940.

George E. Brand, of Detroit, Mich., for appellant.

Ralph E. Routier, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that the appeal herein be and the same is dismissed without costs, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
# L_2006194EN.01002001.xml

| 14.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 194/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 194/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1074/2006

of 13 July 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for white sugar in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 958/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular the second subparagraph and point (b) of the third subparagraph of Article 33(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 of 28 June 2006 on a standing invitation to tender to determine refunds on exports of white sugar for the 2006/2007 marketing year (2) requires the issuing of partial invitations to tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 July 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 July 2006, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for that partial invitation to tender.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the partial invitation to tender ending on 13 July 2006, the maximum export refund for the product referred to in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EC) No 958/2006 shall be 28,424 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 14 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 175, 29.6.2006, p. 49.

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2115 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2115

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Diol #1.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Diol #1.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYCAPROLACTONE DIOL #1.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Caprolactone-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        diethylene glycol                                                  31/2011.......
                        copolymer (CAS
                        No. 75035-33-5)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Robert O. MITCHELL v. ZALE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.

No. 87-C-0319.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Aetna Casualty & Suty. Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85-CA-0485; Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 15863.

Prior report: La.App., 495 So.2d 1021.

Denied.

CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 6, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                            /s/ Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
                            ---------------------------
                            Anthony C. Pintsopoulos
                            Principal Financial Officer
                            November 8, 2005



                                       17
Document

Exhibit 10.8

  Two Folsom Street
         San Francisco, CA 94105





November 20, 2020




Katrina O’Connell    




Dear Katrina:


This letter is to confirm the extension of the existing severance provisions, which are outlined in the “Termination/Severance” section of your offer letter dated March 6, 2020 (“Offer Letter”).  The Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors (“the Committee”) has approved the extension of such severance provisions to June 30, 2024 with no other changes to such provisions.


After June 30, 2024, you will be eligible for severance, if any, as approved by the Committee under the same terms as similarly situated executive officers.


Other than as set forth above, the terms of your Offer Letter remain in effect.


Yours sincerely,




/s/ Sonia Syngal                                      
Sonia Syngal
President & Chief Executive Officer, Gap Inc.








/s/ Katrina O’Connell                                 
Katrina O’Connell            






Date: November 20, 2020