alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

January 6, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50409

Summary Calendar

DIANA SALAS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER

OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CV-174

Before GARWOOD, EMILIO M. GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Diana Salas appeals the judgment affirming the decision by the

Commissioner of Social Security to deny her ap plications for

disability benefits and supplemental security income. Our review

is limited to determining whether the Commission er applied the

proper legal standards and whether the decisio n is supported by2

su bstantial evidence on the record as a whole. S ee Greenspan v.

Shalala

, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994). We may not reweigh the

evidence or try the issue de novo

. S ee Johnson v. Bowen

, 864 F.2d

340, 343 (5th C ir. 1988). The record shows that the ALJ applied

the proper legal standards and that the Commissioner’s decision is

supported by substantial evidence. S ee Greenspan

, 38 F.3d at 236.

Salas argues that the ALJ failed to properly consider the

effects of her migraine headaches and the opinion of the physician

who treated her for those headaches. The administrative record

reflects that the re was good cause for not according controlling

weight to Dr. Carmen Montoya’s opinion, which was conclusional and

inconsistent with other substantial evid ence in the record. S ee

Greenspan , 38 F.3d at 237.

Relying on the testimon y of Dr. Harold Cooper, the medical

expert (“ME”), Salas argues that the ALJ erred in determining that

she retained the residual functional capacity (“RFC”) to perform

her past relevant work and in posing a hypothetical question to the

vocational expert without including the limitations that the ME had

attributed to her. The substantial evidence in the administrative

record supports the ALJ’s rejection of the ME’s opinion on Salas’s

limitations. Thus, there was no error with respect to the ALJ’s

determination on Salas’s RFC or in the hypothetical question posed

to the vocational expert.

Salas also argues that the ALJ impr operly drew inferences3

regarding her credibility and the severity of her impairments based

on her failure to obtain treatment or medication due to poverty.

The ALJ’s opinion pointed out discrepancies between Salas’s

assertions and the documented signs, findi n gs, diagnoses, and

treatment of record. The ALJ also pointed out inconsistencies

between Salas’s statements to Dr. Gonzales and her testimony at her

administrative hearing. The ALJ’s credibility determination is

entitled to great deference, Falco v. Shalala

, 27 F.3d 160, 164

(5th Cir. 1994), and will not be disturbed on the record before us.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Craig Hodgkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.




The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.








Date:  November
      12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Craig
    HodgkinsCraig
      Hodgkins
              President
      and Director
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15096-15097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6134]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1202-000]


Liberty Hill Power LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Liberty Hill Power LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 28, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public

[[Page 15097]]

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the 
web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#53151601101c3d3f3a3d36002623233c212713353621307d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f2b4b7a0b1bd9c9e9b9c97a18782829d8086b294978091dc959d84">[email protected]</span></a> or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 8, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6134 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.0 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 The undersigned officer of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that:  1.
    The Companys Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.
    The information contained in the Companys Annual Report in Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company at and for the periods indicated. Date: March 30, 2005
    /s/ Robert N. Crouch IIRobert N. Crouch IIExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and
Acting Principal Executive Officer)
GRAN~DUCH~DELUXEMBOURG 

~-~- DIRECTION DE L'AVIATION CIVILE 

Reference : 2014 - 38786 

P:/ Legislation I Accords aeriens I USA 

Correspondant: Mr. Marc RAUS 

Tel: (+352) 247 74946 

e-mail: marc.raus@av.etat.lu 

Y/ref: 

Luxembourg, 2 0 AOUT 2014 

OFFICE OF INTERNATIONAL 

AVIATION- US DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORT AT ION 

c/o. Mr. Paul GRETCH 

Director 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

WASHINGTON DC 20590 

Subject : Charter Operations between the Grand-Duchy of Lux embourg and 

the United States of America 

Att. : 

Dear Mr. Gretch, 

This letter is to confirm that the Luxembourg Government, on the basis of 

reciprocity, will approve requests from US-designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth 

and seventh freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US 

Government will approve similar requests from Luxembourg-designated airlines. 

Yours sincerely, 

Post address Office address Telephone Fax Website e-mail 

Boite postale 283 4, rue Lou Hemmer (+352) 247 74900 (+352) 46 77 90 www.dac.lu civilair@av.etat.lu 

L-2012 Luxembourg L-1748 Luxembourg
#### CHICAGO MILL & LUMBER COMPANY, a Corporation, and Walter O. Brown, Appellants, v. GRAND RAPIDS SAMPLE CASE COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellee.

No. 7943.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Nov. 16, 1939.

Charles W. Hills, of Chicago, 111., for appellants.

Earl & Chappell, of Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered adjudged and decreed that the decree of dismissal herein appealed from he and the same is affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, 30 F.Supp. 510, filed. June 30, 1937.
Exhibit 32.1
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Brooklyn  Cheesecake & Desserts Company,
Inc. (the  "Company") on form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, I
Ronald Schutte  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, that

      (i)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
            Section  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
            and

      (ii)  the  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  present,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date: April 15, 2005
                                       /s/ Ronald Schutte
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Ronald Schutte
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer




A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Brooklyn  Cheesecake & Desserts
Company,  Inc.  and will be  retained by and  furnished  to the  Securities  and
Exchange Commissions or its staff upon request.
(May 13, 1991)

#### Jose R. Asteinza, Appellant, v Consuelo P. Asteinza, Respondent.

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff husband appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Kuffner, J.), dated January 4, 1990, which granted the defendant wife’s motion for temporary custody of the infant issue of the marriage, and pendente lite child support in the total amount of $184 per week for the parties’ two children, and (2) a memorandum decision of the same court, dated February 10, 1990, which amended a memorandum decision dated November 13, 1989, to the extent that it found that the pendente lite child support award should be *516amended to the total amount of $217.12 per week for the parties’ two children.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant wife is awarded one bill of costs.

Although a prompt hearing is ordinarily required for the purpose of resolving issues of fact based on controverted allegations arising in a pendente lite custody application *(see, Robert C. R. v Victoria R.,*143 AD2d 262; *Biagi v Biagi,*124 AD2d 770), upon the instant record, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in awarding temporary custody of the two infant children of the parties to the wife without a hearing. The defendant wife noted in her motion papers that the Family Court, after a hearing and a clinical and psychological evaluation of the husband, had previously entered a permanent order of protection directing, *inter alia,*the husband to stay away from the wife, the marital residence and the children except for visitation. The Family Court also set up a visitation schedule. The wife further noted that the husband subsequently broke into the marital residence with the knowledge that he was violating the order of protection, and, as a result, he was placed on probation by the Family Court. The husband did not contest those assertions by the wife. Moreover, there were no factual allegations to indicate that the wife was an unfit parent. Since it does not appear that this is an overly complex case, the husband should be able to proceed to an early trial *(see, Tweed v Tweed,*147 AD2d 556; *Matter of Long v Scism,*143 AD2d 95; *Meltzer v Meltzer,*38 AD2d 522).

Furthermore, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in determining pendente lite child support based upon the standards enunciated in Domestic Relations Law § 240 *(see,*Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [7]; *Rizzo v Rizzo,*163 AD2d 15). Although the consideration of the factors set forth in the Child Support Standards Act is not mandatory on a pendente lite motion, it was within the court’s discretion to use those standards based upon the record before it *(see, Rizzo v Rizzo, supra).*Harwood, J. P., Balletta, Rosenblatt and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13323-13324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5349]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the

[[Page 13324]]

notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 21, 2012.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Renny B. Eadie and Robert M. Eadie, both of Lake City, Florida; 
to collectively acquire additional voting shares of PSB BancGroup, 
Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of 
Peoples State Bank, both in Lake City, Florida.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Mission-Heights Capital, Ltd., and Mission-Heights, LLC, both in 
Houston, Texas, general partner; and Charles Robert Miller, Jr., Odem, 
Texas, individually; to acquire voting shares of Odem Bancshares, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First State Bank of 
Odem, both in Odem, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 1, 2012.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2012-5349 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
John R. Kasich, Governor 

Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor 

Craig W. Butler, Director 

April 17, 2015 

George Czerniak 

Director, Air & Radiation Division 

USEPA Region 5 

77 West Jackson Boulevard 

Mail Code: A-18J 

Chicago, IL 60604-3507 

RE: Correction on March 26, 2015 Ohio State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

Clarification Letter Regarding Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-31 

known as the PM2.5 SIP Submission 

Dear George: 

On March 26, 2015, Ohio EPA submitted a letter to you describing several clarifications 

to our June 19, 2014 PM2.5 State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission. After sending 

that letter, we realized we missed one item and so we are sending this letter to make 

the correction. 

The correction we would like to make is that Ohio EPA requests to exclude the entire 

paragraphs of Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) 3745-31-24(F) and 3745-31-27(A)(1)(b) 

from the SIP. 

If you have any questions please feel free to contact Sudhir Singhal at 614-644-3684. 

Sincerely, 

/Jgk{-/;6dn�c· 

Robert F. Hodanbosi 

Chief, Division of Air Pollution Control 

cc: Michael Hopkins, Assistant Chief, Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollution Control 

Sudhir Singhal, DAPC 

50 West Town Street • Suite 700 • P.O. Box 1049 • Columbus, OH 43216-1049 

www.epa.ohio.gov • (614) 644-3020 • (614) 644-3184 (fax)
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: : Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf

Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Mexico City Miami Milan Monterrey

Moscow Munich New York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo

Ulaanbaatar Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 023866/000002 - 6104242 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

October 16, 2014

By Electronic Mail

Mr. Brett Kruger

Acting Division Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application of Mesa Airlines, Inc. for Exemption Authority (Dallas/Ft. Worth –

Leon/Guanajuato and Queretaro), Docket DOT-OST-2014-0179

Dear Mr. Kruger:

We have polled the U.S. air carrier representatives served with the above-referenced

application filed on October 14, 2014, and no carrier has objected to the relief sought

therein.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Echmalian

Transportation Specialist

jonathan.echmalian@hoganlovells.com

D +1.202.637.5439

cc: Patrick R. Rizzi

marshall.sinick@squiresanders.com; howard.kass@aa.com; robert.wirick@aa.com;

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; chris.walker@delta.com; matwood@cozen.com;

stephen.lachter@lachterlaw.com; jhill@cooley.com; perkmann@cooley.com;

bob.kneisley@wnco.com; leslie.abbott@wnco.com;

dkirstein@yklaw.com; jyoung@yklaw.com; thomas.ting@suncountry.com;

dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com;

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com; brian.hedberg@dot.gov; englets@state.gov;

info@airlineinfo.com
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert J. Holtz,
Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Chairman of the Board of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 USC  Section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.


        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                        ZEROS & ONES, INC.

                                        /s/Robert J. Holtz
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Robert J. Holtz, Chief Executive Officer
                                        and Chairman of the Board

Dated:  April 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 12.1



CERTIFICATION



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Charles Burdick, as Managing Director of Telewest Communications plc (the Company) hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Dated:  June 30, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.