alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2234 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on metal halide lamps designed 

for use in video projectors. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on metal halide 

lamps designed for use in video projectors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. METAL HALIDE LAMPS DESIGNED FOR USE IN 

4 VIDEO PROJECTORS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.37 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 metal halide lamps designed for use in video projectors) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2011’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2234 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2117 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Triol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Triol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYCAPROLACTONE TRIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Caprolactone-2-ethyl-2- 

(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol polymer (CAS 

No. 37625–56–2) (provided 

for in subheading 

3907.99.01) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2117 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Order entered April 10, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00490-CR

KORRON TORADE HILL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-76407-H

ORDER

Pending is the State’s second motion for an extension of time to file its brief. The motion 

is GRANTED and the Clerk of the Court is hereby ordered to file the State’s brief tendered to the 

Court.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 31.2****Certification**I, Romolo Santarosa certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FCB Bancorp for the quarterly periodended March 31, 2006;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation and;  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 12, 2006              /s/ Romolo Santarosa   Romolo Santarosa   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  
46
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference into Registration Statement Nos. 333-12747, 333-08990, 333-30304, 333-57970, 333-70238, 333-107835, 333-114243, 333-115596, 333-134808, and 333-159294 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 4, 2011, relating to ouraudits of the consolidated financial statements of Cray Inc. and Subsidiaries (“the Company”) and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cray Inc.for the year ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ PETERSON SULLIVAN LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 4, 2011
EXHIBIT 12.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert Scott, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,

summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 31, 2005



Robert Scott

By: /s/ "Robert Scott"

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



94
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 17, 2010








/s/ Michael G. WirtzMichael G. Wirtz,

Chief Financial Officer
#### Susan Leonard WILLIAMS et al. v. GERVAIS F. FAVROT COMPANY et al.

No. 87-C-0325.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Williams, Susan Leonard; Williams, Jessica Lynn; Williams, Danielle Marie; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition and mandamus; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. CA-5233; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “E”, No. 82-18364.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 623.

Denied.

CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
Order entered July 13, 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00481

- CV
FRENCH LARRY TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

WENDIE RENEE WILLIAM S, Appellee
On Appeal from the 380t h Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380

- 56604

- 2015



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 6, 2016 second motion for an extension of time to file a
brief and extend the time to AUGUST 1 5 , 2016

. We GRANT the July 6, 2016 motion of Marilea W. Lewis with Orsinger, Nelson, Downing & Anderson, LLP to withdraw as counsel for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Ms. Lewis as counsel for appellant . Appellant is now appearing before this Court pro se. We further DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send all future correspondence in this case to ap pellant at the following mailing address and email address : 1623 Oak Knoll Dallas, Texas 75208 frenchtaylor@aol.com

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7093

BERNARD GIBSON, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

ERIC D. WILSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:14-cv-00454-JCC-TRJ)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Gibson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gibson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) 

petition, which the court correctly treated as a successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, as well as its order denying 

Gibson’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85.

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Gibson’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a 
3

certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATIONS
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL


OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the filing by Lixte Biotechnology Holdings, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) of its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2010 (the “Quarterly Report”) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, John S. Kovach, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(i)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and




(ii)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May
      3, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      JOHN S. KOVACHJohn
      S. KovachChief
      Executive Officer andChief
      Financial Officer
## AirlinesforAmerica®

September 1, 2016
Mr. Michael J. O'Donnell, A.A.E. Director, Office ofAirport Safety and Standards Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Subject: Airport SMS Draft Advisory Circular-Request for Extension of Comment Period Reference: Safety Management System for Certificated Airports Docket number FAA-2010-0997 Dear Mr. O'Donnell: On behalf ofAirlines forAmerica (A4A) member airlines1
, I am writing to request a 60-day extension of the comment period forthe Draft Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5200-37 A, Safety Management Systems (SMS) forAirports. A4A respectfully requests this extension forthe following reasons:
• With the deadline forthe SNPRM also being September 12, 2016, a comprehensive review ofboth documents simultaneously has not been possible. To date, the focus of ourview has been to provide constructive and meaningful comments on the SNPRM. The companion AC, which will affect aspects of airport SMS implementation having an impact on our memberairlines, deserves the same focused review.
• An extension is also justified as there is currently no revised "Initial Regulatory Evaluation" or cost/benefit analysis is in the docket. The public cannot effectively evaluate the impact ofthe proposed rule and supporting guidance based on a regulatory evaluation from 2010 that does not reflect the changes subsequently made in the SNPRM. Therefore, A4A's position is that an extension is required to provide adequate time to address the issues cited above. Thank you in advance, for yourconsideration ofthis request. Sincerely, 

# C?vt**l~** Paul 

### J. McGraw Vice President, Operations & Safety

1A4A members are: Alaska Airlines, Inc.; American Airlines Group (American Airlines and US Airways); Atlas Air, Inc

.; Federal Express Corporation.; Hawaiian Airlines; JetBiue Airways Corp.; SouthwestAirlines Co.; United Continental Holdings, Inc.; and United Parcel Service Co. AirCanada is an associate member

.

1275 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Suite 1300 Washington, DC 20004 T 202.626.4000 W airlines org
, J.

Gibbons "requires plaintiffs to set forth the facts which support a legal theory"); 

### Hay v. Hay, 100 Nev. 196, 198, 678 P.2d 672, 674 (1984) ("Because Nevada is a notice-pleading jurisdiction, our courts liberally construe pleadings to place into issue matters which are fairly noticed to the adverse party"). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court dismissing appellant's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim for failure to state a claim REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order. 1

J. Saitta J.
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Thomas J. Tanksley, Settlement Judge Cohen & Padda, LLP Schiff Hardin LLP Eighth District Court Clerk 'Having reviewed respondent's answering brief, we further conclude that respondents have not established that appellant's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim should have otherwise been dismissed based on claim preclusion. 

### See Five Star Capital Corp. v. Ruby, 124 Nev. 1048, 1054, 194 P.3d 709, 713 (2008) (requiring that the parties or their privies be the same for claim preclusion to apply).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A 4411#9
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2218 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ipconazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ipconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IPCONAZOLE (2-[(4-CHLOROPHENYL)METHYL]-5- 

4 (1-METHYLETHYL)-1-(1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOL-1- 

5 YLMETHYL) CYCLOPENTANOL). 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.08 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 Ipconazole) is amended by striking the date in the effec9 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2218 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
RICHARD COURT INFO

To Whom it May concern at the Third court of appeals

the Alfred n Hughs ilrn.t in

am corently housed at

Gatesville tx. I am asking for an extintion for me to file

my PDR, because I didnt

recieve it from my Lawyer until! it was past the deadline to

file.There are two cases,

NO.03-13-00333-CR and No. 03-13-00334 CR.

Thank you,

Richard Gonzales Sr.#1857179

Alfred Hughs unit

Rt 2 Box 4400

Gatesville Tx,76597

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 2 9 2015

Abel Acoeta,Clerk

Page 1

7-ZW

JUL 2 2015

Jhirdcour:

FILED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUL 30 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product                               ( print page 1920)                            Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.                    

Dated: January 10, 2012.

Todd A Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-625 Filed 1-10-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P