alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130704 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130704 

 COA: 265116 

Kent CC: 02-010147-FC 

WILLIAM CLINTON SIVLEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0619 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2006 

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Trung Tri Doan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | April 12, 2011 |   | /s/ Trung Tri Doan                            |
|--------|----------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |           |   | Name: Trung Tri   Doan                        |
|   |           |   | Title: Chairman   and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                              |                            |
|---------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                              |
|                             |                                                                         |                       |
| Dated:              November 14, 2006 | By:                                                                     | /s/              Craig Hodgkins |
|                                  | Craig              Hodgkins                                                       |
|                                  | President                and Director(Principal                Executive Officer) |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50777 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO SUAREZ-QUEZADA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2748 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Armando Suarez-Quezada (Suarez) has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Suarez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw isNo. 06-50777

2 GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
# Comments of the IPAA and the Western Energy Allianc e on the Methane White Papers [STB-WORKSITE.FID550610]

Attached please accept the comments of the Independ ent Petroleum Association of America and Western En ergy Alliance on the United States Environmental Protect ion Agency’s (“EPA”) White Papers on Methane and VO C Emissions (“White Papers”) which were released for external peer review on April 15, 2014. Please contact me or Matt Kellogg at 202.857.4722, Ursula Rick at 303.623.0987, or Jim Elliott at 202.361.8215 if you have any questions regarding these comments. 

### James D. Elliott Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC 1100 Bent Creek Boulevard, Suite 101 Mechanicsburg, PA 17050 717.791.2012 - office 202.361.8215 - mobile 717.795.2743 - fax jelliott@spilmanlaw.com View My Bio http://www.s pilmanlaw.co m/media% 20content/m edia content/pictu CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, includ ing any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privi leged information. Any unauthorized review, use, di sclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the inte nded recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

## D. Elliott <jelliott@spilmanlaw.com> James Mon 6/16/2014 7:03 PM To: Mccarthy, Gina <McCarthy.Gina@epa.gov>; OilandGas.W hitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov>; Cc: Lee Fuller <lfuller@ipaa.org>; Kathleen Sgamma <KSg amma@westernenergyalliance.org>; Ursula Rick <URick@westernenergyalliance.org>; Matt Kellogg <MK ellogg@ipaa.org>; 

###  1 attachment Comments on Methane White Papers with Attachments.p df; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 Comments of the IPAA and the Western Energy Allianc...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 26/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
#### Mrs. Dorothy Williams CORLEY and Twin City Gas Company v. Alfred McKinnley CRAFT and Mrs. Carol Massingale Craft.

No. 87-C-0320.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Craft, Alfred McKinnley; Craft, Carol Massingale; applying for writ of cer-tiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit,, No. 18-377-CA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 84-2711.

*19Prior report: La.App., 501 So.2d 1049.

Denied.
**Exhibit32**

 

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. § 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350,chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of ReefOil & Gas Partners LLC, the managing general partner of Reef Global EnergyVI, L.P. (the “Partnership”), do hereby certify that to such officers’knowledge:

 

(a)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Partnership fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)   the information contained in the Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

 

This certification ismade solely for the purposes of U.S.C. §1350, and not for any other purpose.

 
| Date: November 21, 2005 | /s/ Michael J. Mauceli           |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Michael J. Mauceli               |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer          |
|                    | Reef Oil & Gas  Partners LLC |
|                    |                             |
|                    |                             |
|                    | /s/ Daniel C. Sibley             |   |
|                    | Daniel C. Sibley                 |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer          |
|                    | Reef Oil & Gas  Partners LLC |
|                         |                                  |        |  |

 

**This certification shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to theextent as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.**

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.2


SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp.(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, these financial statements were not reviewed by
our independent registered public accountants; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations


of the
Company.











Date:
March 24, 2008








/s/
Michael G. Wirtz


Chief
Financial Officer
#### CONCORDIA FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. KIMLER & ENTIN, P.A., Whispering Pines Properties, Inc., John R. Macari, James J. Sepielli and Russell J. Sepielli, jointly and severally, Appellees.

No. 4-86-0984.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 8, 1987.

*27Robert J. Schaffer, Miami, for appellant.

Richard C. Entin of Kimler & Entin, P.A., Sunrise, for appellees.

STONE, Judge.

Appellee filed a complaint in interpleader. Appellant filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. After denial of the motion the court entered an order granting appellee the right to inter-plead and dismissing the appellee upon the funds being deposited. The court erred in accepting the interpleader and releasing the appellee over objection without first permitting appellant to answer and assert affirmative defenses. *Ziegler v. Frank, Streklow & Gay,*421 So.2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); *Hernandez v. Travelers Ins. Co.,*356 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).

There was no error in denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss. *DeGarcia v. Seiglie,*230 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

We therefore affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2234

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on metal halide lamps 
                 designed for use in video projectors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on metal halide lamps 
                 designed for use in video projectors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METAL HALIDE LAMPS DESIGNED FOR USE IN VIDEO PROJECTORS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.37 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to metal halide lamps designed 
for use in video projectors) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2015

NO. 03-15-00213-CR

Ex parte Kelly James McCarty

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED AS MOOT -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus signed by the trial 

court. Having reviewed the record, the Court dismisses the appeal as moot. The appellant shall 

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6383

CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFICE OF GENERAL 

COUNSEL; WARDEN JOSEPH MCFADDEN; ASSOCIATE WARDEN 

BLACKWELL, All of Under Color of State Laws,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:15-cv-02772-JFA)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 2, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Lyndale Gaddy appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Gaddy that failure 

to file timely, specific objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas 

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Gaddy has waived appellate review 

by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper 

notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district 

court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2307 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2307

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain extruders used 
                   in the production of radial tires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain extruders used 
                   in the production of radial tires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EXTRUDERS USED IN THE PRODUCTION OF RADIAL TIRES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.85 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain extruders used in 
the production of radial tires) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective column period and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2233 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2233

   To suspend temporarily the duty on suspended particle device film.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on suspended particle device film.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENDED PARTICLE DEVICE FILM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Other optical       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        elements;                                                          31/2011.......
                        Suspended
                        particle device
                        film produced by
                        patented
                        technology that
                        results in
                        microscopic light-
                        absorbing
                        particles
                        changing tint
                        completely in
                        seconds by
                        adjusting the
                        electrical
                        voltage (provided
                        for in subheading
                        9001.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15343-15344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2012-0054; FRL-9647-8]


Oklahoma: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Oklahoma has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Oklahoma. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make

[[Page 15344]]

a proposal prior to the immediate final rule because we believe this 
action is not controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. 
We have explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to 
the immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose 
this authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule 
will become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by April 16, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Oklahoma during normal business 
hours at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, phone number (214) 665-8533; or Oklahoma 
Department of Environmental Quality, 707 North Robinson, Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma 73101-1677, (405) 702-7180. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the immediate final 
rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
 Al Armendariz,
 Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-6277 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.2



|             |  |   |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|------------ |  | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.2 |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ RANDALL T. MAYS    
|Name:                  |  | Randall T. Mays        
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Issuer and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.