alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1   | The              report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|---------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2   | The              information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|---------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                                                    |                                         |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
| Date: November              9, 2007 |                                                                                                    | /s/ Katherine              A. Ostruszka |
|                                     | Katherine              A. Ostruszka                                                                     |
|                                     | Chief                Financial Officer And Controller(Principal                Financial Officer)  |

----
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing
Tax Credits, L.P. (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,  Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
 Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
 President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
 Date:  July 30, 2009
#### Charles CRUDUP v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0242.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 9, 1993.

Appeal No. 4300 from Judgment dated Feb. 21, 1991, Marcus D. Gordon, Ruling Judge, Scott County Circuit Court.

*1383Fred T. Rucker, Clarence R. Scales, Scales & Scales, Jackson, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Ellen Y. Dale, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for ap-pellee.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and SULLIVAN and PITTMAN, JJ.

Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERT MANGASARYAN, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 09-73950 Agency No. A077-835-150
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted January 8, 2014 Pasadena, California Before: W. FLETCHER, M. SMITH, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. The Board of Immigration Appeals’ (B IA) adverse credibility determination is not supported by substantial evid ence. The BIA relied on alleged inconsistencies in Mangasaryan’s testim ony regarding the sequence of events and the intervals between events, but those alleged inconsistencies are legitimately explained by the obvious difficulty Manga saryan experienced converting dates 

# FILED
JAN 24 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.Page 2 of 2 from the Farsi calendar to the Gregorian calendar. See Zahedi v. INS , 222 F.3d 1157, 1167 (9th Cir. 2000). The only arguable exception involves Mangasaryan’s testimony regarding the interval betw een the border and store incidents, but we have held that a single inconsistency of this sort does not constitute substantial evidence. See Vilorio-Lopez v. INS , 852 F.2d 1137, 1139, 1142 (9th Cir. 1988). As we concluded in 2009 on Mangasaryan’s first appeal to this court, he may be able to show a nexus to a protected ground once his testimony is properly credited. Mangasaryan v. Holder , 334 F. App’x 87, 88–89 (9th Cir. 2009). We remand to the BIA to consider the merits of his asylum and withholding of removal claims, with instructions to deem his testimony credible. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of November 6, 2008.



/S/ THEODORE R. SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)/S/ WILLIAM R. LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40924 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NELSON ANTONIO SORTO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:05-CR-105-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Nelson Antonio Sorto appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. Sorto argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. Sorto’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Sorto contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overruleNo. 05-40924 -2- Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Sorto properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART

1

Attachment “A” to Settlement Agreement 

Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson 

Case No. 3:10-cv-04060 

State SA ¶ 110(a)(2) Requirements * SIP Identification**

Maryland 3 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), 

(E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 

0011; 0011.1; 0011.2; 

0011.3; 0011.4; 0011.5; 

0011.6 

Arkansas 3 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), 

(E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 

0028; 0028.1 

Virginia 5 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), 

(E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 

December 10, 2007, Letter 

from David K. Paylor, 

Director of VADEQ, 

and enclosure “State 

Implementation Plan 

110(a)(2) Requirements for 

Ozone”; 

December 13, 2007, Letter 

from David K. Paylor, 

Director of VADEQ, 

and enclosure “Status of 

110(a)(2)Requirements in 

the Virginia State 

Implementation Plan”

Oklahoma 5 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), 

(E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 

0031 

Florida 7 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and 

(M). 

0015 

Arizona 8 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2) (A)–(C), (E), (F) 

& (H)-(M) 

October 14, 2009, Letter 

from Benjamin H. 

Grumbles, Director ADEQ, 

“Re: Arizona State 

Implementation Plan 

Revision Under Clean Air 

Act Section 110(a)(2) and 

(2); 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 

1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and 

1997 8-hour Ozone 

NAAQS.” 

Georgia 10 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and 

(M). 

0016; 0041 
SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART

2

Attachment “A” to Settlement Agreement 

Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson 

Case No. 3:10-cv-04060 

* This Settlement Agreement only obligates EPA to act on the requirements regarding the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS addressed in the 2008 Findings Notice or other submissions cited in this chart. This does 

not include 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(I) and portions of section 110(a)(2)(C) pertaining to 

nonattainment area requirements. 

** Unless otherwise specified, this is the Document ID from the docket for our 2008 

completeness findings, Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-1173, or the date of the submission. 

The docket may be accessed online at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Tennessee 11,12 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), 

and (M). 

0021; 

May 28, 2009, Submission 

by Barry Stephens, 

Technical Secretary for 

TDEC, “Official Submittal 

Request for State 

Implementation Plan 

Revisions to 1200-3-9-.01 

Construction Permits; 

1200-3-9-.02 Operating 

Permits; and 1200-3-9-.03 

General Provisions” 

North Carolina 14 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), 

and (M). 

0019; 0019.1; 0019.2 

Nevada 14 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), 

(D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), 

and (M). 

February 1, 2008, Letter 

from Leo M. Drozdoff, 

Administrator NDEP, with 

enclosures regarding “CAA 

110(a)(2)(A)-(M) 

Requirements in the 

Current Nevada State 

Implementation Plan for 8-

hour Ozone”
#### Chris G. MOLBERT, Oscar G. Molbert, Sr. Mrs. Oscar Molbert, Sr., & Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company (Blue Cross) (Intervenor) v. Arthur D. TOEPFER, Allstate Insurance Co. (dismissed 03/11/85), Department of Transportation and Development, State of Louisiana, City of Lafayette & Continental Insurance Company.

No. 89-C-0836.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

May 26, 1989.

In re Transportation & Dev. Dept. of; State of Louisiana; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA87-1382; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 845455.

Prior report: La.App., 540 So.2d 577.

Granted.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

134305 Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PATRICK C. BRONIAK, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 134305 COA: 274584 Wayne CC: 06-605677-CZ MARTIN A. CLENDENING, DURAN GRISA, and MEGO, INC., Defendants-Appellees, and

MIDAS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2189 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2,3-Propanetriol, polymer 

with 2,4-diisocyanato-1-methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)–1,3- 

propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1,2,3- 

Propanetriol, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1- 

methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)–1,3- 

propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,2,3-PROPANETRIOL, POLYMER WITH 2,4- 

4 DIISOCYANATO-1-METHYLBENZENE, 2-ETHYL5 2-(HYDROXYMETHYL)–1,3-PROPANEDIOL, 

6 METHYLOXIRANE AND OXIRANE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.80 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2189 IS

1 1,2,3-Propanetriol, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1- 

2 methylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)–1,3- 

3 propanediol, methyloxirane and oxirane) is amended by 

4 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

JENNIFER M. STRAW AND THOMAS P. 

STRAW, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF 

ELIJAH C. STRAW, DECEASED; AND 

ROWAN J. STRAW, A MINOR, BY AND 

THROUGH HIS PARENTS AND 

NATURAL GUARDIANS, JENNIFER M. 

STRAW AND THOMAS P. STRAW.

v.

KIRK A. FAIR AND GOLON MASONRY 

RESTORATION, INC.

v.

PITTSBURGH LUBES, INC. D/B/A JIFFY 

LUBE, TOWER AUTO SALES & 

SERVICE, NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE 

PARTS ASSOCIATION-NAPA AUTO 

PARTS T/D/B/A NAPA

v.

THOMAS P. STRAW

PETITION OF: PITTSBURGH LUBES, 

INC. D/B/A JIFFY LUBE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 320 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

JENNIFER M. STRAW AND THOMAS P. 

STRAW, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COADMINISTRATORS OF THE ESTATE OF 

ELIJAH C. STRAW, DECEASED; AND 

ROWAN J. STRAW, A MINOR, BY AND 

THROUGH HIS PARENTS AND 

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 321 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court
[320 WAL 2018 and 321 WAL 2018] - 2

NATURAL GUARDIANS, JENNIFER M. 

STRAW AND THOMAS P. STRAW

v.

KIRK A. FAIR AND GOLON MASONRY 

RESTORATION, INC.

v.

PITTSBURGH LUBES, INC. D/B/A JIFFY 

LUBE, TOWER AUTO SALES & 

SERVICE, NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE 

PARTS ASSOCIATION-NAPA AUTO 

PARTS T/D/B/A NAPA

v.

THOMAS P. STRAW

PETITION OF: PITTSBURGH LUBES, 

INC. D/B/A JIFFY LUBE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains fifty-two week summary financial information extracted
from APAC TeleServices, Inc.'s 1996 Annual Report and Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                             141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,509
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,284
<PP&E>                                          96,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,930
<BONDS>                                          1,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           465
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,381
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,443
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  193,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,276
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 309
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 49,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,550
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,550
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
  þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 5(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended
    
    December 31, 2004
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File Number 001-14784
 Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
 
  Nevada
    
    75-2615944(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 1755 Wittington Place, Suite 340, Dallas, Texas
    
    75234(Address of prinicpal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants Telephone Number, including area code
    
    214-750-5800
  Title of Each ClassCommon Stock, $0.01 par value
    
    Name of each exchange on which registeredAmerican Stock Exchange
 None
 Yes þ No o
 þ
 Yes o No þ
 Yes o No þ




---



##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR  INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
  
    
    Pages 30-31  Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
has been amended to provide the city and state where each report is issued.
    
    Pages 46-47  Item 8. Financial Statements. Note 5 to the
consolidated financial statements is further amended to provide enhanced
disclosure with respect to the Metra transaction.
    
    Exhibit 31.1  Certification required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a).
 1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Date:  September 28, 2005.
    INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY
INVESTORS, INC.By:
    /s/ R. Neil Crouch, IIR. Neil Crouch, II, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer and Acting
Principal Executive Officer 2




---



##### 



30




---



##### 



31




---



##### 



NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE
  2005
    
    $
    6,4462006
    
    
    6,1012007
    
    
    7172008
    
    
    2,8332009
    
    
    742Thereafter
    
    
    27,503$
    44,342
   46




---



##### 



Sq.Ft/
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net Cash Received/Property
    
    Location
    
    
    Acres
    
    
    Debt Incurred
    
    
    Debt Discharged
    
    
    (Paid)
    
    
    Interest Rate
    
    
    Maturity DateOffice Building
Chuck Yeager
    
    Chantilly, VA
    
    
    60,060
    
    
    $
    5,500
    
    
    $
    4,307
    
    
    $
    1,193
    
    
    
    5.25
    %(1)
    
    
    1/07
 
 (1)
    
    Variable Rate RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
      47
No. 14-0428 West Virginia Department of Transportation v. Newto n

Justice Ketchum, concurring: I am writing to point out to lawyers handling emin ent domain cases that there is an exception to the rule that property is valued as of the date of taking. When there is a decrease in the value of the condemned property prior to the da te of taking which is caused by the public improvement project, the decreases, in some instanc es, may be disregarded in determining just compensation.

In Huntington Urban Renewal Authority v. Commercial Ad junct Co ., 161 W.Va. 360, 242 S.E.2d 562 (1978) we held:

Any decrease, not of a general character, in the fa ir market value of real property prior to the date of valuati on, caused by the public improvement for which such property i s acquired, or by the likelihood that the property wi ll be acquired for such improvement, other than that due to physical deterioration within the reasonable contro l of the owner, would be disregarded in any determination of the just compensation to be awarded the property owner for t he property. 

### FILED May 13, 2015 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA