alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 1999
Form 10-K of Armor Holdings, Inc., and is qualifed in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000845752
<NAME> ARMOR HOLDINGS
<CURRENCY>   USD
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,028
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,691
<INVENTORY>                                     16,452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,040
<PP&E>                                          22,646
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           245
<OTHER-SE>                                     157,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,922
<SALES>                                        156,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               156,664
<CGS>                                           94,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   320
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,003
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,196
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.61








</TABLE>
#### Richard Hilton TOMLIN v. STATE.

5 Div. 347.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama.

Aug. 25, 1989.

AFTER REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in *Ex parte Tomlin,*548 So.2d 1341 (Ala.1989), we are compelled to reverse the conviction and sentence based on the charge of unlawful possession of marijuana, and render a judgment in Tomlin’s favor.

REVERSED AND RENDERED.

All the Judges concur.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, David A. Husband, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and;     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize, and report financial information ; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:     March 29, 2006           /s/ David A. Husband     David A. Husband    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     In connection with the Annual Report of Central Parking Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onDecember 14, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Emanuel Eads, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2452 

To renew and make technical corrections to the temporary suspension of 

duty on paclobutrazol technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To renew and make technical corrections to the temporary 

suspension of duty on paclobutrazol technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PACLOBUTRAZOL TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.99 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 paclobutrazol technical) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking the article description and in8 serting the following: ‘‘(2RS,3RS)-1-(4- 

9 Chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-lVerDate Nov 24 2008 22:36 Nov 03, 2009 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2452.IS S2452

jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2452 IS

1 yl)pentan-3-ol (Paclobutrazol) (CAS No. 76738–62– 

2 0) (provided for in subheading 2933.99.22)’’; and 

3 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

4 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

7 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  Certification



I,  Andrea J. Moss certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on Form 8-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report,  of American  Express Credit
Account Master Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Date:  March 13, 2006

/s/  Andrea J. Moss
---------------------
Name:  Andrea J. Moss
Title: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLOR957000-L63100000-HD0000: HAG12-0112]


Filing of Plats of Survey: Oregon/Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The plats of survey of the following described lands are 
scheduled to be officially filed in the Bureau of Land Management 
Oregon/Washington State Office, Portland, Oregon, 30 days from the date 
of this publication.

Willamette Meridian, Oregon

T. 18 S., R 6 W., accepted February 24, 2012
T. 27 S., R. 10 W., accepted March 2, 2012
T. 21 S., R. 29 E., accepted March 2, 2012
T. 20 S., R. 29 E., accepted March 2, 2012
T. 23 S., R. 6 W., accepted March 2, 2012
T. 33 S., R. 5 W., accepted March 2, 2012


ADDRESSES: A copy of the plats may be obtained from the Land Office at 
the Bureau of Land Management, Oregon/Washington State Office, 333 SW. 
1st Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97204, upon required payment. A person or 
party who wishes to protest against a survey must file a notice that 
they wish to protest (at the above address) with the Oregon/Washington 
State Director, Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Oregon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Hensley, (503) 808-6124, Branch 
of Geographic Sciences, Bureau of Land Management, 333 SW. 1st Avenue, 
Portland, Oregon 97204. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business 
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a 
message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply 
during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Before including your address, phone number, 
email address, or other personal identifying information in your 
comment, you should be aware that your entire comment--including your 
personal identifying information--may be made publicly available at any 
time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.

Mary J.M. Hartel,
Chief, Cadastral Surveyor of Oregon/Washington.
[FR Doc. 2012-6471 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-33-P
#### In the Matter of Angelia M. Bast, Appellant, v County of Clinton, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Plumadore, J.), entered May 10, 1990 in Clinton County, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Among the factors to be considered in deciding an application to serve a late notice of claim are whether the public corporation had actual knowledge of the claim and the infancy of the party making the motion (General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]). Not only was the delay here unrelated to petitioner’s infancy, as counsel was retained within 90 days of the incident *(see, Matter of Sampson v Cazzari,*142 AD2d 681; *Matter of Albanese v Village of Floral Park,*128 AD2d 611, 613), but there is no evidence that respondent had actual knowledge of the claim *(see, Washington v City of New York,*72 NY2d 881, 883; *Matter of Howard v City of Rochester,*162 *1080AD2d 1033, 1034). In addition, petitioner has failed to give an adequate explanation of why this application was delayed for more than one year after the accident *(see, Matter of Groshans v Town of Babylon,*143 AD2d 666). Under the circumstances, we see no reason to disturb Supreme Court’s order denying petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Levine, Mercare, Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2440 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2440

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on marine sextants of metal 
          designed for use in navigating by celestial bodies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on marine sextants of metal 
          designed for use in navigating by celestial bodies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARINE SEXTANTS OF METAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.81 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to marine sextants of metal 
designed for use in navigating by celestial bodies) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23(a)

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-16939, 333-33276 and 333-117057) of our report
dated March 23, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2006 of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiary (the "Company"), which included an explanatory paragraph regarding
the Company's change in accounting principle for its method of accounting for
stock-based compensation, included in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ Eisner LLP
New York, New York
March 23, 2007
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002
 
 In
connection with this Amendment Number 1 to the Annual Report of LGA Holdings, Inc.(the
Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Marty Williams, Chief Executive Officer
and Presidentof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:
October 1, 2008
 
 
 
 /s/ Marty
Williams
 Marty
Williams
 Chief
Executive Officer, President
 
 The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Zimbra 

Zimbra 

Unauthorized Helo Ops 

From :Russ Maguire <rmaguire@norwoodma.gov> 

Subject: Unauthorized Helo Ops 

To: kputnam@flightlevelaviation.com 

Cc : Mike Delaria 

< mdelaria@flightlevelaviation.com>, Peter 

Eichleay <peichleay@gmail.com>, Mark 

Raymond <mraymond@norwoodma.gov> 

Good morning all , 

Page 1 of2 

rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 

Sat, Apr 25, 2015 09:49AM 

A short time ago , I prevented a Bell 206 (Nl34VG) from taking 

o ff in the fueling box east of your t - hangars . This aircraft was 

a transient helicopter that appears to have been hangared in 

hangar 10 overnight ; and this morning , Flight Level ' s line man , 

Steve , apparently towed the helo to the fuel box where the two 

pilots were getting ready to take off when I approached them . 

I identified myself and told the pilots that it was an 

unauthorized helicopter operating area , also telling them that 

the helo had to be towed to an authorized operating area for 

helo transients (e.g ., the parking circles) . They refused to 

have the helo towed there . They also insisted they were going to 

take off in the fuel box . 

At that point , I called ATC and the controller agreed not to 

issue them a clearance for take - off . 

Airport management shouldn ' t be put in a position where it goes 

this far . I put this one on Flight Level. Your lineman , Steve , 

admitted that he hadn ' t been advised of the airport ' s authorized 

helo operating areas . Therefore , please double down with your 

line personnel . Also , when Flight Level is approached by 

prospective helo transients looking to hangar , please convey to 

these operators--where applicable --the full breadth of our 

airport regulations and procedures . Thanks . 

Russ 

https:/ /ncs.norwoodma.gov/h/printmessage?id=5 8669&tz= America/New_ York 4/25/2015
#### STATE ex rel. Terry W. HOWARD v. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-1737.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Howard, Terry W.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court, Div. “F”, No. 10830-80.

Denied.
#### James H. BROWN, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY JAIL, and Morton Salt Company, Respondents.

No. 4-86-2679.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1987.

James H. Brown, pro se.

Lowell L. Garrett of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Miami, for respondent, Morton Salt Company.

Philip S. Shailer of Shailer, Purdy & Jolly, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent, Sheriff of Broward County Jail.

PER CURIAM.

We treat the pro se petition for an extraordinary writ as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. *See Price v. Johnston,*334 U.S. 266, 68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356 (1948).

Petitioner, the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit, is incarcerated in the custody of the State Department of Corrections. The trial court has entered an order barring all future attendance by petitioner at hearings, and providing that all future pretrial motions in the case will be decided by memo, and without oral argument.

We do not question that the court has discretion to enter such an order. *89However, we conclude that the exercise of that discretion is not supported by the record. *Price v. Johnston; Stone v. Morris,*546 F.2d 780 (7th Cir.1976). The following factors, among others, should be balanced by the trial court before making its determination:

> [C]osts and inconvenience of transporting a prisoner from his place of incarceration to the courtroom, any potential danger or security risk which the presence of a particular inmate would pose to the court, the substantiality of the matter at issue, the need for an early determination of the matter, the possibility of delaying trial until the prisoner is released, the probability of success on the merits, the integrity of the correctional system, and the interests of the inmate in presenting his testimony in person rather than by deposition.

*Stone*at 735-86.

Respondents argue that *Anderson v. State,*267 So.2d 8 (Fla.1972), supports the trial court’s decision. However, in *Anderson,*before the trial court determined that the attendance of petitioner was not required, it made findings based on a record which supported that decision. Here, as far as the record reflects, petitioner was barred simply because he was in state custody.

Included among potential factors to be considered are: the risk and danger of escape; the need for expedited disposition of the case; costs to the state and defense; inconvenience to the state, defense, and court; security precautions; the availability of transportation without court order; the nature of the hearing; the recommendations, policies, and standard procedures of the Department of Corrections; whether oral argument is generally accorded others without motion; the impact of court-ordered transportation and lodging on the state and sheriff; and any other relevant factors.

Therefore we grant the petition, and reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

DOWNEY, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
The requirements for the aftermarket catalytic converter policy (AMCC Policy) are established in 

the Federal Register (51 FR28114-28119, 28113 (Aug. 5, 1986); 52 FR. 42144 (Nov. 3, 1987)), 

not in the Code of Federal Regulations.
#### Charles S. EDGERTON v. Shelia I. EDGERTON.

No. 57652.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Aug. 5, 1987.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 16, 1987.

Delos H. Burks, Stewart, Burks, Pace & Carroll, Picayune, for appellant.

Richard C. Fitzpatrick, Poplarville, Jayne L. Buttross, Gulfport, for appellee.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Pearl River County; Sebe Dale, Jr., Chancellor.

Before WALKER, C.J., and PRATHER and ANDERSON, JJ.

AFFIRMED.