alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.40
 THIRD AMENDING AGREEMENT
  THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, University Act
 University
  ONCOGENEX TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
 Licensee
  A.
    
    The University and the Licensee entered into a license agreement with
a Date of Commencement of November 1, 2001 with respect to TRPM-2 (the
Original Clusterin License Agreement) pursuant to which the
University granted the Licensee an exclusive worldwide license to the
Technology;B.
    
    The University and the Licensee entered into an amending agreement
effective as of August 30, 2006 with respect to the Original Clusterin
License Agreement (the First Amending Agreement) and a second
amending agreement and consent effective as of August 7, 2008 with
respect to the Original Clusterin License Agreement as amended by the
First Amending Agreement (the Second Amending Agreement and together
with the First Amending Agreement, the Amendments); andC.
    
    In connection with a proposed sublicense in respect of the Original
Clusterin License Agreement as amended by the Amendments (the
Clusterin License Agreement), pursuant to a proposed Collaboration
and License Agreement (the Teva Agreement) by and between the
Licensee and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. (Teva), the
University and the Licensee now wish to further amend the Clusterin
License Agreement, as set out below.
  Amending Agreement
  *
    
    Certain information in this exhibit has been omitted
as confidential, as indicated by [***].  This information has been filed separately with
the Commission.




---



##### 








---



##### 



Teva Sublicense Agreement




---



##### 



provided, however




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF Effective Date
 SIGNED FOR AND ON BEHALF OFTHE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
by its duly authorized officers:/s/
Brad WheelerAuthorized SignatoryAuthorized SignatorySIGNED FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
ONCOGENEX TECHNOLOGIES INC.
By its duly authorized officer:/s/
Scott CormackAuthorized Signatory
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic  Bancshares,  Inc. (the "Company"),  each certify
that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:

|1. |  | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
                    with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
                    Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 10, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                       |  | Robert P. Trask           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer   

|Date:  August 10, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Michelle Monts
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------
|                       |  | Michelle Monts           
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Maday FERNANDEZ, a minor, et al., Appellant, v. BERKEL, INC., Appellee.

No. 86-1361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

Fernando F. Freire, P.A., and Fernando F. Freire and Herman M. Klemick, Miami, for appellant.

Schwartz, Yolpe & Ordonez, P.A., and Vanessa L. Volpe and David Auslander, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the appellee that the interrogatory jury verdict finding no negligence on the part of the defendant appel-lee, no breach of an implied warranty, and no product defect is supported by competent, substantial evidence. We, accordingly, affirm the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict.

Affirmed.
AFS-14-056-E January 6, 2014

Exemption No. 8264E Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2004-17184

Ms. Suzanne K. Ishii-Regan Parent of Patrick Regan

6726 Double Tree Court Anchorage, AK 99507

Dear Ms. Ishii-Regan:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8264, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the

conditions and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received November 27, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Patrick Regan for an extension of Exemption No. 8264, as amended. That exemption from § 121.311(b) and (c)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Patrick to be secured by a personal safety belt, the E-Z-ON Modified Vest (vest) while aboard an aircraft. It also allows any air carrier or commercial operator, operating under part 121, to conduct such operations while Patrick is secured by the vest.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Patrick.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8264, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113, and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Patrick Regan an exemption from§ 121.311(b) and (c)(1) which allows Patrick to be secured by a personal safety belt, the E-ZON Modified Vest (vest) while aboard an aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Patrick’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. In addition, Patrick’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8264, as amended, to March 31, 2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flights Standards Service
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1945
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee,

No. 97-2256
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee.2 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA96-3472-S) Submitted: December 18, 1997 Decided: January 6, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing Appellant's complaint alleging employment discrimination claims and denying Appellant's motion to vacate the district court's order dismissing his complaint. Appellant also appeals the district court's order denying his motion for recusal and granting his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Shalala, No. CA-96-3742-S (D. Md. July 14, 1997; July 28, 1997; July 30, 1997; Aug. 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrathName:
    
    Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate: May 13, 2011
Exhibit 10.1


 


EXTENSION
AGREEMENT


 


This
Extension Agreement (this “Agreement”), dated as of this 21 day of November, 2020, is by and between Cenntro Holding
Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Cenntro”) and Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation, a British Virgin Islands
company with limited liability (the “Company”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS,
in June 2017, Shanghai Hengyu Enterprise Management Consulting Co., Ltd., a PRC company (“Hengyu”), the Company’s
62.5% owned subsidiary, sold its 16.23% equity interest in Sinomachinery Group Limited to Cenntro, the Company’s majority
shareholder, for RMB 321.92 million (the “Sale Price”);


 


WHEREAS,
the outstanding balance of the Sale Price, in the amounts of 251,441,993, (approximately $38,060,365), became due on October 27,
2020 (the “Due Date”) pursuant to the terms of that certain representation letter of Cenntro dated as of July 2, 2019
(the “Letter”); and


 


WHEREAS,
Cenntro and the Company have agreed to amend the terms of the Letter to extend the Due Date.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, for a consideration of $100.00, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Cenntro and the Company
agree as follows:


 


1.
The Due Date for the payment of the outstanding balance of the Sale Price shall be extended from October 27, 2020 to April
27, 2022.


 


2.
Except as herein above amended, the terms and provisions of the Letter shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original for all
purposes.


 


4.
This Agreement shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of
each of the parties hereto.


 


5.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York.


 


[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]


 






     


     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be signed by their duly authorized
officers.


 


Dated:
November 21, 2020


 


	 	Cenntro Holding Limited
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Peter Wang
	 	Name:	Peter Wang
	 	Title:	President
	 	 
	 	Greenland Technologies Holding Corporation
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Raymond Wang
	 	Name:  	Raymond Wang
	 	Title:	CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,164
<SECURITIES>                                    66,694
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,159
<PP&E>                                          23,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 120,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,790
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   120,985
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   745
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,668
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (54,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.49)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of ICx Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 16, 2009



By:

/S/ COLIN J. CUMMINGColin J. CummingChief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/ DEBORAH D.
MOSIERDeborah D. MosierChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to ICx Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by ICx Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Joyce LYTTGE, by her Guardian ad Litem and David Lyttge, Plaintiff and Appellants, v. Wendy HANSON, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 17893.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 1, 1984.

Anthony M. Thurber, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellants.

Timothy Dalton Dunn, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

HALL, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff appeals the summary judgment of the district court that dismissed her cause of action for injuries sustained while a guest passenger in defendant’s automobile. The dismissal was granted on the strength of the Guest Statute, U.C.A., 1953, § 41-9-1.

*Malan v. Lewis,*Utah, 693 P.2d 661, also filed this day, determines the Guest Statute to be unconstitutional. We therefore vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for trial. No costs awarded.

STEWART, OAKS, HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.
#### STATE ex rel. Paul Martin McCARTY v. R. Hilton BUTLER, Warden.

No. 89-KH-0004.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re McCarty, Paul Martín; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 9-85-797.

Denied.
**SECTION        906 CERTIFICATION**

| (1)       | the                  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending December 31,                  2004 fully                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the                  Securities                  Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  (2) |  the                  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in                  all                  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations                  of The                  Amacore Group, Inc.         |

|   |  /s/                  Clark A. Marcus                           Clark                  A. MarcusChief                  Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered July 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00481-CV

FRENCH LARRY TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

WENDIE RENEE WILLIAMS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-56604-2015

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s July 6, 2016 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief and extend the time to AUGUST 15, 2016.

We GRANT the July 6, 2016 motion of Marilea W. Lewis with Orsinger, Nelson, 

Downing & Anderson, LLP to withdraw as counsel for appellant. We DIRECT the Clerk of this 

Court to remove Ms. Lewis as counsel for appellant. Appellant is now appearing before this 

Court pro se. We further DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send all future correspondence in 

this case to appellant at the following mailing address and email address:

1623 Oak Knoll

Dallas, Texas 75208

frenchtaylor@aol.com

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
31.2




AULTRA
GOLD INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302




I, Rauno
Perttu, Chief Financial Officer of Aultra Gold Inc., certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q /A for
the period ended March 31, 2009 of Aultra Gold Inc




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; and




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
internal control over financial reporting;




5. The
issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer's internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date:  October
      29, 2009
              By:
              /s/ 
      Rauno
      PerttuRauno
      PerttChief
      Financial Officer
#### COLORADO DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF the STATE OF COLORADO, and Hilltop Rehabilitation Hospital, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 85SA213.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Sept. 29, 1986.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. For-man, Sol. Gen., Mary Karen Maldonado, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for petitioner-appellant.

Williams, Turner & Holmes, P.C., John P. Gormley, Grand Junction, for respondent-appellee Hilltop Rehabilitation Hosp.

*794No appearance for respondent-appellee The Industrial Com’n of State of Colo.

ERICKSON, Justice.

We accepted jurisdiction in *Colorado Division of Employment & Training v. Industrial Commission*from the court of appeals because the issue presented for review is identical to the issue addressed in *Colorado Division of Employment & Training v. Parkview Episcopal Hospital,*725 P.2d 787 (Colo.1986). For the reasons stated in *Parkview,*the decision of the Industrial Commission is reversed.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Lee JOHNSON a/k/a Lemah Johnson.

No. 87-K-2302.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Johnson, Lee a/k/a; Johnson, Lem-ah; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18877-KA; Parish of Claiborne, 2nd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 15551.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 882.

Denied.

CALOGERO and LEMMON, JJ„ would grant as to Assignments of Error 19 and 20.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly report of EAST WEST Distributors, Inc.. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March  31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I , Gerald N. Kern,
Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that:

(1)   
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:   
/s/   Gerald N. Kern
| | ---------------------------

| | Gerald
N. KernChief Financial Officer(as of 05/01/06)
| | -----------------------------------------------------

| | May
01, 2006
| | ------------