alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006189EN.01000501.xml

| 12.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 189/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 189/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1053/2006

of 11 July 2006

amending, for the 10th time, Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 of 11 October 2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in support of effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) (1), and in particular Article 10(a) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 lists the persons covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 lists the persons covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources under that Regulation.

| (2) | The Commission is empowered to amend that Annex, taking into account Council Decisions implementing Council Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of ICTY (2). Council Decision 2006/484/CFSP implements that Common Position. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 should, therefore, be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission is empowered to amend that Annex, taking into account Council Decisions implementing Council Common Position 2004/694/CFSP on further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of ICTY (2). Council Decision 2006/484/CFSP implements that Common Position. Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 should, therefore, be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2006.

For the Commission

Eneko LANDÁBURU

Director-General for External Relations

---

(1)  
  OJ L 315, 14.10.2004, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2006 (OJ L 72, 11.3.2006, p. 7).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 315, 14.10.2004, p. 52. Common Position as last amended by Decision 2006/484/CFSP (See page 25 of this Official Journal).

2

---

ANNEX

The following person shall be removed from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004:

Zelenovic, Dragan. Date of birth: 12.2.1961. Place of birth: Foca, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Nationality: Bosnia and Herzegovina.

---
#### STATE ex rel. Gregory SOCKWELL v. Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0641.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Sockwell, Gregory; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 214-756.

Granted. Evidentiary hearing on free, knowing and voluntary nature of guilty plea ordered in case #214-756.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-10337

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Daniel Hernandez Martinez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:23-CR-70-3

______________________________

Before Wiener, Ho, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Defendant-Appellant Daniel 

Hernandez Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez Martinez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 3, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-10337 Document: 40-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/03/2024
No. 24-10337

2

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Counsel’s motion 

for leave to withdraw is therefore GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 24-10337 Document: 40-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/03/2024
Presidential Documents

15229 

Federal Register 

Vol. 77, No. 50 

Wednesday, March 14, 2012 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of March 13, 2012 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran 

Executive Order 12957 

On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, the President declared a 

national emergency with respect to Iran, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), to deal with the unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy 

of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of the Government 

of Iran. On May 6, 1995, the President issued Executive Order 12959, imposing more comprehensive sanctions to further respond to this threat; on 

August 19, 1997, the President issued Executive Order 13059, consolidating 

and clarifying the previous orders; and I issued Executive Order 13553 

of September 28, 2010, Executive Order 13574 of May 23, 2011, Executive 

Order 13590 of November 20, 2011, and Executive Order 13599 of February 

5, 2012, to take additional steps pursuant to this national emergency. 

Because the actions and policies of the Government of Iran continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States, the national emergency declared 

on March 15, 1995, must continue in effect beyond March 15, 2012. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency 

with respect to Iran. Because the emergency declared by Executive Order 

12957 constitutes an emergency separate from that declared on November 

14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, this renewal is distinct from the emergency renewal of November 2011. This notice shall be published in the 

Federal Register and transmitted to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 13, 2012. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6426 

Filed 3–13–12; 2:00 pm] 

Billing code 3295–F2–P 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry
& David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the
undersigned officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 30, 2005



/s/ William H. WilliamsWilliam H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Stephen V. OConnellStephen V. OConnellChief Financial Officer andChief Administrative Officer
#### James JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-2344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Elliott H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Steven Scott, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

James Jackson appeals the sentence imposed by the trial court upon his conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer. He correctly contends that the trial court erred in assessing points for victim injury.1 Because victim injury is not an element of the offense, the trial court should not have assessed points for victim injury.2 We therefore vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. *See Northcut v. State,*493 So.2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); *Teehan v. State,*488 So.2d 132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); *see also Larkins v. State,*476 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

1

. He does not contest points assessed for victim injury for the aggravated battery conviction.

2

. The current version of Fla.R.Crim P. 3.701(d)7 provides that victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured during commission of the offense. *See Fla.R,Crim.P. Re: Sentencing Guidelines,*509 So.2d 1088 (Fla.1987). Rule 3.701(d)7, in effect in August 1986, the date of the offense, prohibited an assessment of victim injury points unless victim injury was an element of the convicted offense. This latter version is applicable here. *Rubier v. State,*530 So.2d 523 (Fla.1988).
EXHIBIT 99.1

April 1, 2002
Office of the Chief Accountant
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549
RE:     Letter Responsive to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X
Dear Sir or Madam:
In compliance with Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, I am writing to inform you that Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") has represented to LS Power Funding Corporation, LSP-Cottage Grove, L.P. and LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership (collectively "LSP") that Andersen's audit of the balance sheets of LSP as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements of income, statements of changes in shareholders' equity or partners' capital, and statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the United States accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this audit.
Sincerely,/s/ THOMAS F. SCHWARTZThomas F. Schwartz
Senior Vice President
 and Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Force Energy Corp. (the Company) hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      quarter ended August 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                      



|Dated: October 23, 2009 | /s/ Rahim Rayani                                         
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Rahim Rayani                                             
|                        | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer
|                        | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting 
|                        | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                 





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Force Energy
Corp. and will be retained by Force Energy Corp. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ramon Alfredo PEREZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10411.

D.C. No. CR-00-00139-SOM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 1, 2003.*

Decided May 8, 2003.

*636Before SKOPIL, FERGUSON, and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Ramon Mfredo Perez entered a conditional guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 50 grams of crystal methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), and 846. He appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress.

We review the district court’s ultimate conclusion that Perez did not have standing to contest the legality of the search de novo, and accept its findings of fact unless clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Padilla,*111 F.3d 685, 687 (9th Cir.1997). A defendant must show that he has standing to challenge a search by demonstrating “a subjective expectation of privacy that is objectively reasonable” in the area searched. *See United States v. Taketa,*923 F.2d 665, 670 (9th Cir.1991).

The package was detained at the post office overnight until a drug search canine alerted to it. The package was not addressed to Perez, and he does not indicate how he had any possessory or privacy interest in it at the time. Instead, he argues that he had a privacy interest in the home of the addressee, Rosa Hernandez, where he resided at the time. This is irrelevant to the detention of the package at the post office. Nor does Perez show a privacy interest by arguing that he was participating in an “arrangement” with the other defendants, as there is not coconspirator exception to the Fourth Amendment standing requirement. *See United States v.*Padilla, 508 U.S. 77, 78, 113 S.Ct. 1936, 123 L.Ed.2d 635 (1993) (per curiam); *Padilla,*111 F.3d at 687 (same on remand).

We note that, in any event, this court has found that Hernandez, the addressee of the package, had standing to challenge the search and that the post office had reasonable suspicion to detain the package at the post office. *See United States v. Hernandez,*313 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir.2002), *cert. denied*—U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 1953, 155 L.Ed.2d 867 (2003).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5993]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the Southern 
Company Services, Inc.:

2012 Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning Process (SERTP) 1st 
Quarter Meeting--Regional Planning Stakeholders' Group Meeting and 
Interactive Training Session

March 14, 2012, 9 a.m.-5 p.m., Local Time

    The above-referenced meeting will be held at:

Alabama Power Company Corporate Headquarters, Room 4H, Birmingham, 
Alabama

    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: www.southeasternrtp.com.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket No. ER10-2881, Alabama Power Company, et al.
Docket No. ER10-2882, Southern Power Company, et al.
Docket No. ER10-2883, Mississippi Power Company, et al.
Docket No. ER10-2884, Georgia Power Company, et al.
Docket No. ER10-2885, Gulf Power Company, et al.
Docket No. ER11-3429, Alabama Power Company
Docket No. ER12-337, Mississippi Power Company

    For more information, contact Valerie Martin, Office of Energy 
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6139 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0a6919c95829995debd918284999eb096958293de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb9daaa7aeb9a2aee586aab9bfa2a58badaeb9a8e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5993 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 13.1

             CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                   (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,
                   CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of DRAXIS Health Inc., a corporation incorporated under the
laws of Canada (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

         The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003
(the "Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



         Dated:   May 14, 2003         /s/ Martin Barkin
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Martin Barkin, M.D.
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer




         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for
the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Simon Pedder, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Simon PedderSimon PedderPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 12, 2008
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and, |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                                       |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:  May 23, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Robert S. DeMeulemeester                                          |   |
|                           |   | Robert S. DeMeulemeester                                                   |   |
|                           |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |   |
|                           |   |                                                                       |   |