alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for the period
ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the
periods presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerMay 4, 2010
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-97538 and 333-23635)  pertaining to the Accom, Inc. 1995 Stock
Option/Stock  Issuance Plan, the Accom,  Inc.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and
the Accom,  Inc.  1997  Non-Executive  Stock  Option  Plan of our  report  dated
February 23,  1999,  except for notes 3 and 12 as to which the date is April 14,
1999,  with respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements and the schedule
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Accom, Inc.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Palo Alto, California
April 15, 1999
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|June 29, 2004
# Official Journal C 247/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 247 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6529 June 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 247

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6529 June 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 247/01 | Commission notice – The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU product rules 2022 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 247/01

Commission notice – The ‘Blue Guide’ on the implementation of EU product rules 2022 (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### NORWICH SAVINGS SOCIETY *v.*GEORGE R. FLONNES ET AL.

*George R. Flonnes,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 922 (AC 16944), is denied.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to the best of her knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                   
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2010 |  | /s/ JUDITH L. BJORNAAS                                                                            
|                     |  | Judith L. Bjornaas
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Colonial Penn Insurance Company, Respondent, v Jose A. Medina, Appellant, et al., Respondents.

—In a proceeding to stay arbitration of an uninsured motorist claim, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Golden, J.), dated February 15, 1990, which granted the petition to the extent of temporarily staying the arbitration pending resolution of the underlying personal injury action brought by the respondent Jose Angel Medina.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting from the decretal paragraph, the words "the underlying personal injury action brought by the respondent, Jose Angel Medina” and substituting therefor the following, "the issue of the involvement and, if so, the issue of the permissive use of the alleged offending vehicle owned by Gaines Service Leasing Corp., at an evidentiary hearing to be conducted in this *615special proceeding”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant payable by the petitioner-respondent, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in .accordance herewith *(see, Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Casanova,*145 AD2d 630). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, James G. Weller, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Z Yachts, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The  small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-15(e)  and  15d-15(e)) for the small business  issuer  and  have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed  in this  report any  change in  the small business issuer's  internal control over  financial reporting that occurred during the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and





---

5.

The  small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,  process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

May 20, 2008



By:

/s/ James G. Weller

James G. Weller

Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 99-4628

GREGORY OXENDINE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.

C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge.

(CR-97-559)

Submitted: April 27, 2000

Decided: May 4, 2000

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges,

and BUTNZER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Debra Owens Jackson, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. J.

Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Robert H. Bickerton, Assistant

United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Oxendine pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute and to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846

(1994), and was sentenced to a term of ninety-two months incarceration, but was continued on bond to allow him to continue cooperation

with the government. The government later moved for a reduction of

sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, based on his substantial assistance. The district court granted the

motion and reduced Oxendine's sentence to sixty months. Oxendine

appeals the reduced sentence, challenging the extent of the district

court's reduction. We find that we lack jurisdiction to review the

extent of the reduction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3741(a) (1994); see also

United States v. Pridgen, 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir. 1995) (holding that § 3742(a) governs appeals of rulings on Rule 35(b) motions);

United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 323-24 (4th Cir. 1995) (finding

that appellant review of extent of downward departure is not authorized under § 3742(a)).

We therefore dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 2
------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory Rotelli, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Razor Resources Inc. for
the period ended October 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Razor Resources Inc.


Dated: April 7, 2011

  /s/Gregory Rotelli
  Gregory Rotelli
  President, Secretary and Director
  (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
  and Principal Accounting Officer)
  Razor Resources Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Razor Resources Inc. and will be retained
by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated November 17, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2042 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-248056) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 17, 2020
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-0648

Filed May 11, 2016

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

ALSTON RAY CAMPBELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Jeanie K. Vaudt, 

Judge.

Alston Campbell appeals his conviction, judgment, and sentence for 

operating while intoxicated, second offense. AFFIRMED. 

Don L. Williams, Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Mary A. Triick, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Considered by Potterfield, P.J., and Mullins and McDonald, JJ.
2

MULLINS, Judge.

A jury found Alston Campbell guilty of operating while intoxicated, second 

offense. He has appealed his judgment and sentence, alleging his successive 

trial counsel were ineffective in failing: (1) to adequately investigate the 

availability and content of surveillance videos from the convenience store where 

he was seen shortly before his arrest, (2) to interview the convenience store 

clerk, (3) to obtain video of the procedure of, and conversation with, law 

enforcement at the Polk County Jail, (4) to have witness depositions reported, 

(5) to request a continuance of trial when substitute counsel was appointed only 

eight days before trial, and (6) to keep him adequately informed and advised of 

trial preparation and strategy. 

We agree with the State that the record is inadequate to address any of 

those claims. See State v. Biddle, 652 N.W.2d 191, 203 (Iowa 2002) (noting we 

generally preserve ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims for possible 

postconviction-relief proceedings in which a more thorough record can be 

developed and trial counsel is given an opportunity to explain his or her conduct). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment and sentence and preserve all claims for 

possible postconviction-relief proceedings. See State v. Johnson, 784 N.W.2d 

192, 198 (Iowa 2010) (holding that if a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel 

cannot be addressed on appeal because of an inadequate record, the court must 

preserve it for postconviction-relief proceedings).

AFFIRMED.
OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY

5/29/2015 COA Case No. 12-13-00330-CR 

### PULLINS, TIMOTHYDEWAYNE Tr. Ct. No. 007-0509-13 PD-0648-15 

### On this day, this Courthas granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion for an extension oftime in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the 

### petition has been extended to Tuesday, August 04, 2015. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review mustbefiled with The CourtofCriminalAppeals. Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * -n O i*o> m > r -5 A I or O ^ J9-—-> o =: ri 2. V, r-'sJ _j•"»



# COURT 

# urtof Ap m O e?. -n a >
a -o •\



# PEAL istrrct '* J /
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6133]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1198-000]


Solano 3 Wind LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Solano 3 Wind LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is March 28, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2a4a7b0a1ad8c8e8b8c87b19792928d9096a284879081cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23656671606c4d4f4a4d46705653534c515763454651400d444c55">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 8, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6133 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2068 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fenpyroximate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on fenpyroximate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FENPYROXIMATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Tert-butyl (E)-α-(1,3-dimethyl-5-phenoxypyrazol-4- 

ylmethyleneaminooxy)-ptoluate (Fenpyroximate) 

(CAS No. 134098–61–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

2933.99.22) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2068 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 13, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 127750 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, JUDITH ANN LAFUENTE, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 127750 

 COA: 249551 

Oakland CC: 02-041264-NO 

CHERRY HILL LANES NORTH,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1006 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 13, 2005 

Clerk