alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
http://www.dec.ny.gov/enb/20111228_reg2.html#263040137800002

Applicant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc 4 Irving Pl New York, NY 10003 -3502 Facility: Ravenswood Steam Plant 38-54 Vernon Blvd Long Island City, NY 11101 Application ID: 2-6304-01378/00002 Permit(s) Applied for: Article 19 Air Title V Facility Project is Located: Queens, Queens County Project Description: The Department has prepared a draft permit and has made a tentative determination to issue a Title V Permit modification for a steam/electric generating facility. The purpose of the modification is to include as required under Part 249 the Ne w Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART 6NYCRR Part 249) which will be submitted to the USEPA for approval as a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). In accordance with 6NYCRR Part s 621.7(b)(9) and 201-6.4(c), the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has the authority to bar issuance of any Title V Facility Permit if it is determined not to be in compliance with applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act or 6NYCRR Part 201. Persons wishing to inspect the subject Title V files, including th e application with all relevant supporting materials, the draft permit, and all other materials available to the DEC (the "permitting authority") that are relevant to this permitting decision should contact the DEC representative listed below. The Draft Permit and Permit Review Report may be viewed and printed from the Department web site at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/32249.html. DEC will evaluate the application and the comments received on it to determine whether to holda public hearing. Comments and requests for a pub lic hearing should be in writing and addressed to the Department representative list ed below. A copy of the Department's permit hearing procedures is available upon request or on the Department web site at: http://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6234.html. Availability of Application Documents: Filed application documents, and Department draf t permits where applicable, are available for inspection during normal business hours at the a ddress of the contact person. To ensure timely service at the time of inspecti on, it is recommended that an ap pointment be made with the contact person. State Environmental Quality Re view (SEQR) Determination: Project is not subject to SEQR because it is a Type II action. SEQR Lead Agency: None Designated State Historic Preservation Act (SHPA) Determination: The proposed activity is not subject to review in accordance with SHPA . The permit type is exempt or the activity is being reviewed in accordance with federal historic preservation regulations. Coastal Management: This project is not located in a Coastal Manage ment area and is not subj ect to the Waterfront Revitalization and Coastal Resources Act. Opportunity for Public Comment: Comments on this project must be submitted in writing to the Contact Person no later than Jan 27, 2012

. Contact: Elizabeth A Clarke NYSDEC Region 2 Headquarters 47-40 21st St Long Island City, NY 11101 (718)482-4997 r2dep@gw.dec.state.ny.us
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2193 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2193

         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 10,10'-
                          Oxybisphenoxarsine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 10,10'-
                          Oxybisphenoxarsine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 10,10'-OXYBISPHENOXARSINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.29 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 10,10'-Oxybisphenoxarsine) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Central Parking Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-98118, 33-98120, 33-98122, 333-37909 and 333-74837) on Form S-8 and the
registration statements (Nos. 333-52497 and 333-54914) on Form S-3 of Central
Parking Corporation of our report dated December 14, 2004 with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Central Parking Corporation and Subsidiaries as
of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2004, and all
related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the September 30,
2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Central Parking Corporation.

Our report dated December 14, 2004, refers to a change in Central Parking
Corporation's method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Nashville, Tennessee
December 14, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,223
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,078
<PP&E>                                         284,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 640,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,969,522
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     54,764
<COMMON>                                        48,290
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,451,459)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   640,504
<SALES>                                      7,395,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,395,959
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,020,420
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,624,461)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,624,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,624,461)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
#### Philip RICE, as owner of the scow “E. S. JOHNSON,” and Nathan Galley, Libellants-Appellees, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee, Grace Iron & Steel Corporation and Luria Steel & Trading Corporation, Respondents-Appellants. LURIA STEEL & TRADING CORPORATION, Libellant-Appellant, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent-Appellee, Philip Rice, Respondent-Impleaded-Appellee, Grace Iron & Steel Corporation, Respondent-Impleaded-Appellant.

No. 153.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Jan. 8, 1940.

Max Rockmore, of New York City, for appellants.

Lynch & Hagen, of New York City (Anthony V. Lynch, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for libellants-appellees.

William C. Chanler, Corp. Counsel, of New York City (George Seagrave Franklin and John T. Condon, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee City of New York.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 2493 LT Case No. 05
- 2014 -CF- 046788 -A

_____________________________ J OSEPH H. M ILMAN , Appella nt,
v. S TAT E OF F LORIDA , Appellee
.

_____________________________ 3.850 a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Circuit County. David C. Koenig, Judge. Joseph H. Mil man, Bonifay, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee. M arch 5, 2024
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . M AKAR , E ISNAUGLE and H ARRIS , JJ., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     In connection with the Annual Report of Central Parking Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onJanuary 29, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Jeff Heavrin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.              /s/ JEFF HEAVRIN   Jeff Heavrin   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer        A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TOCENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TOTHE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing. This certification is executed as of January 29, 2007.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1855 

To extend the suspension of duty on cyproconazole technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on cyproconazole technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYPROCONAZOLE TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.59 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cyproconazole technical) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
CMAQ Input and Output Files for OTR Modeling Domain

Input and output files for 2002 Base Case, 2009 BOTW and 2012 BOTW model runs are listed below. Files are available in electronic format for the 12km domain from NYSDEC for use with the SMOKE/CMAQ sy s tem. Please contact NY DEC (Gopal Sitla at 518 - 402 - 8402) for information requests. The total file size is about 660 GBs. CMAQ input files

– emissions Premerged and merged annual 2002 BaseB1 emissions (~140 GB) Premerged and merged annual 2009 BOTW BaseB4 emissions (~140 GB) Premerged and merged May - September 2012 BOTW BaseB4 emissions (~70 GB) CMAQ input files

– meteorology MCIP3 output files MCIP3 files for OTC 12km modeling domain from May to Sep 2002 period File size is about 30 Gb per month CMAQ input files

– boundary and initial conditions BCON and ICON Boundary condition files for OTC 12km modeling domain from Dec 2001 to Dec 2002 File size is about 14Gb Initial concentration file is <1Mb CMAQ input files

– photolysis rates JPROC JPROC files from Dec 2001 to Dec 2002 File size is <1Mb CMAQ output files

– output 2002 BaseB1 Selected CMAQ output files from May 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain ACONC, dry

/wet deposition, AEROVI S and 8h ozone files, total size is about 36Gb CMAQ output files

– output 2009 BOTW BaseB4 Selected CMAQ output files from May 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain ACONC, dry

/wet deposition, AEROVI S and 8h ozone files, total size is about 42Gb CMAQ output files

– output 2012 BOTW BaseB4 Selected CMAQ output files from M ay 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain ACONC, dry

/wet deposition, AEROVI S and 8h ozone files, total size is 36Gb
Moon Lake Electric Assn., Inc.

Distribution Pole Replacement Costs

17-Oct-11

General Information: Kwinder

1. Standard distribution transformer Pole is 40 foot Class 4 Western Red Cedar

2. Replacement pole is a 40 foot Class 3 Western Red Cedar

3. Replacement is performed while circuit is energized.

4. Backhoe is normally required for installation, removal and replacement of distribution poles.

5. Most distribution lines are three-phase lines and replacement is estimated for that type of circuit.

6. No salvage value is given to the pole being retired since it will not be re-used.

7. The only new equipment being installed along with the replacement pole is the grounding of the ne

8. Hardware and other equipment on the original pole, other than in 7 above, is re-used. 

9. Labor, transportation, and overheads are estimated to complete the retirement of the original pole

 and replace it with a new pole in the energized circuit as described above including the cost of the n

Estimated cost of this pole replacement process is $ 2,541.
ment of distribution poles.

stimated for that type of circuit.

nt pole is the grounding of the new pole.

7 above, is re-used. 

he retirement of the original pole

d above including the cost of the new pole.

ss is $ 2,541.
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Gowdy, Jr., as Principal Accounting Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                                             
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|March 15, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/    ROBERT E. GOWDY,
JR.                                 
|               |  |     |  | Robert E. Gowdy, Jr. Controller and Chief Accounting Officer

This
certification is furnished with this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and 
Engineering Center (MRSEC) at Georgia Tech by the Division of 
Materials Research (DMR) <greek-i>1203.
    Dates and Times: Feb. 20, 2012; 7:45 a.m. -6 p.m., Feb. 21, 
2012; 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Georgia Tech, School of Material Science in Atlanta, 
Georgia.
    Type of Meeting: Partial Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Sean L. Jones, Program Director, Materials 
Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of 
Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-2986.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the MRSEC at Georgia Tech.

    Agenda:

Monday, February 20, 2012

    7:45 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed (Panel Brief)
    9 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open (Review of MRSEC)
    4:30 p.m.-6 p.m. Closed (Exec Session)

Tuesday, February 21, 2012

    8 a.m.-9 a.m. Closed (Exec Session)
    9 a.m.-10 a.m. Open (Review of MRSEC)
    10 a.m.-3:30 p.m. Closed (Exec Session, Draft & Review Report)

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include 
information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including 
technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with PREM. These 
matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: January 10, 2012.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-560 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       2003          2002          2001           2000           1999
                                                     --------      --------      --------       --------       --------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>
(Loss) Income from continuing operations             $ 15,321      $  2,041      $(26,037)      $ (3,159)      $ (7,623)
Add fixed charges                                      34,662        33,893        32,055         29,117         31,905
                                                     --------      --------      --------       --------       --------
Earnings (as defined)                                $ 49,983      $ 35,934      $  6,018       $ 25,958       $ 24,282
                                                     --------      --------      --------       --------       --------

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                                      5,223         4,690         5,981          5,442          6,299
  Amortization of debt issuance costs                     943           258           197            172            289
  Estimated interest component of rent expenses        28,496        28,945        25,877         23,503         25,317
                                                     --------      --------      --------       --------       --------

Total fixed charges                                  $ 34,662      $ 33,893      $ 32,055       $ 29,117       $ 31,905
                                                     --------      --------      --------       --------       --------

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)                   1.45x         1.06x           --             --             --
Deficiency in earnings to cover fixed charges              --            --      $ 26,037       $  3,159       $  7,623
</TABLE>



(1)      The "ratio of earnings to fixed charges" represents earnings divided by
         fixed charges, as defined in the following paragraph. The "deficiency"
         represents the amount of fixed charges in excess of earnings.

         For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
         earnings consist of earnings (loss) from continuing operations before
         income taxes and change in accounting principle plus fixed charges.
         Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt
         issuance costs, and one-third of rent expense, which is deemed to be
         representative of interest expense.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Metropolitan Transit Authority v. Beverly Brooks

and

Beverly Brooks v. Metropolitan Transit Authority

Appellate case number: 01-16-00158-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-19862

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Metropolitan Transit Authority (“METRO”), and appellant, Beverly 

Brooks, each filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s final judgment, signed on December 

4, 2015. Each appellant’s brief initially was due on August 8, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.6(a). On August 29, 2016, Brooks filed her appellant’s brief. METRO’s appellee’s 

brief, therefore, was due on September 28, 2016.

On August 31, 2016, this Court granted METRO’s first motion to extend time and 

extended the time to file its appellant’s brief to October 17, 2016, with no further extensions 

absent exceptional circumstances. On October 25, 2016, we granted METRO’s second 

motion and extended the time to file its appellant’s brief to December 16, 2016, with no 

additional extensions. And, on November 7, 2016, we granted METRO’s motion to extend 

the time to file its appellee’s brief and extended the time to file that brief to December 16, 

2016, with no further extensions. METRO, representing that it “has been trying to settle this 

appeal,” has filed a third motion to extend time to file its brief. We grant the motion. 

METRO’s appellant’s brief and appellee’s brief, if any, are due to be filed no later 

than January 17, 2017. No additional extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 12, 2017