alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except

as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable G. Murray Snow, United States District Judge for the District

of Arizona, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FELIPE FELIX-CARRAZCO,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-30317

D.C. No. CV-04-064-BLW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 9, 2010

Seattle, Washington

Before: FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SNOW, District Judge.**

Felipe Felix-Carrazco (“Felix”) contends that the district court erred when it

denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition without granting an evidentiary hearing on his

claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28

FILED

APR 14 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the record

conclusively shows that Felix is not entitled to relief on his claim of ineffective

assistance. See United States v. Howard, 381 F.3d 873, 877 (9th Cir. 2004); United

States v. Rodrigues, 347 F.3d 818, 823 (9th Cir. 2003). Felix fails to explain how he

was prejudiced by his attorney’s alleged errors. See United States v. Mejia-Mesa, 153

F.3d 925, 931 (9th Cir. 1998). Although he alleges that his attorney did not conduct

a proper investigation and that he was not adequately prepared for trial, Felix fails to

explain how counsel was ill-prepared or why the alleged lack of preparation somehow

affected the outcome in this case. See Villafuerte v. Stewart, 111 F.3d 616, 632 (9th

Cir. 1997) (holding that petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim failed

because he did not explain what his attorney “would have found had he investigated

further” and failed to explain “what lengthier preparation would have accomplished”).

We also reject Felix’s argument that the attorneys who prepared his § 2255

petition were ineffective because they failed to comply with the District of Idaho’s

Local Rules. A federal habeas petitioner has “no right to counsel on his collateral postconviction 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition.” United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129,

1130 (9th Cir. 1990) (citing Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987)).

Accordingly, Felix “cannot raise an ineffectiveness of counsel claim” based on his
3

attorneys’ alleged misconduct during the § 2255 proceedings. Id.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15834-15835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6464]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that LongueVue Capital Partners II, L.P. 
(``Applicant''), 111 Veterans Blvd., Suite

[[Page 15835]]

1020, Metairie, LA 70005, an SBIC Applicant under the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958, as amended (``the Act''), in connection with 
the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under section 
312 of the Act and section 107.730, Financings which Constitute 
Conflicts of Interest, of the Small Business Administration (``SBA'') 
rules and regulations (13 CFR 107.730). LongueVue Capital Partners II, 
LP proposes to provide debt financing to Blue Dot Energy Services, LLC 
(``Blue Dot'' or the ``company''). Blue Dot is located at Route 76 
East, Bridgeport, WV 26330.
    A conflict of interest exemption is required because the Blue Dot 
investment is considered financing of an Associate under 13 CFR 
107.730(a). Blue Dot is an Associate of the Applicant because Associate 
of Applicant, LongueVue Capital I (``LVCI''), has a greater than 10 
percent fully diluted investment in Blue Dot prior to Applicant's 
initial investment.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for 
Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: March 12, 2012.
Sean Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2012-6464 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ridge G. LEGENDRE.

No. 88-KA-1315.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

Aug. 24, 1989.

*1278Harry. F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Janet Ahern, Asst. Dist. Atty., New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellee.

Dwight Doskey, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, New Orleans, for defendant-appellant.

Before BARRY, LOBRANO and BECKER, JJ.

BARRY, Judge.

In *State v. Legendre,*522 So.2d 1249 (La.App. 4th Circ.1988), *writ den.*523 So.2d 1321 (La.1988), this Court affirmed the conviction but remanded for resentencing because the trial court apparently did not consider the defendant’s mental illness as a mitigating factor. The defendant was re-sentenced and he appeals that sentence.

Our errors patent review revealed that the record did not state that the defendant was present' for resentencing. We requested a per curiam from the district court. The per curiam states the defendant was present for resentencing.

By his sole assignment the defendant alleges the trial court erred by again considering the defendant’s mental illness as an aggravating circumstance. At resen-tencing the judge stated:

> The Court of Appeals had remanded for reconsideration of sentence. Upon such reconsideration, the Court has found insufficient reason to alter the sentence originally imposed.

> Mental problems notwithstanding, the defendant was found to be competent by a duly appointed sanity commission. His crime was atrocious and clearly illustrated a dangerous proclivity set forth in the pre-sentence report.

> With due respect it is not accurate to say that this Court did not consider the defendant’s mental condition as a mitigating factor. This factor was simply outweighed by the extremely dangerous conduct involved. This Court is not without sympathy for the defendant, but the Court cannot permit sympathy to color its judgment or bias against the needs of the community.

The trial judge clearly stated that he considered the defendant’s mental condition as a mitigating factor, but felt that condition was outweighed by the aggravating circumstances of an extremely “atrocious” act. The trial court obviously took into consideration the defendant’s mental illness.

The sentence is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census


Establishment of the National Advisory Committee on Racial, 
Ethnic, and Other Populations

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Committee Establishment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) is hereby giving 
notice that the Secretary of Commerce has determined that the 
establishment of the National Advisory Committee of Race, Ethnic, and 
Other Populations is necessary and in the public interest. The 
Committee will function solely as an advisory body and in compliance 
with provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Copies of the 
charter will be filed with the appropriate Committees of the Congress 
and with the Library of Congress.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeri Green, Chief, Office of External 
Engagement, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, telephone 301-
763-2075 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#430926312a6d043126262d0300262d3036306d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="38725d4a51167f4a5d5d56787b5d564b4d4b165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Census Bureau's National Advisory 
Committee on Racial, Ethnic, and Other Populations will advise the 
Director of the Census Bureau on the full range of Census Bureau 
programs and activities. The Advisory Committee will provide race, 
ethnic, and other population expertise from the following disciplines: 
economic, housing, demographic, socioeconomic, linguistic, 
technological, methodological, geographic, behavioral and operational 
variables affecting the cost, accuracy, and implementation of Census 
Bureau programs and surveys, including the decennial census.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
Robert M. Groves,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 2012-5752 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2008086DE.01003401.xml

| 28.3.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 86/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 86/34

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1924/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20. Dezember 2006 über nährwert- und gesundheitsbezogene Angaben über Lebensmittel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 404 vom 30. Dezember 2006
  . Berichtigte Fassung im
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 12 vom 18. Januar 2007
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 404 vom 30. Dezember 2006

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 12 vom 18. Januar 2007

Die nachstehenden Bezugnahmen beziehen sich auf die Veröffentlichung im
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 12 vom 18. Januar 2007.

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

Seite 17, Anhang — Nährwertbezogene Angaben und Bedingungen für ihre Verwendung, Überschrift „HOHER BALLASTSTOFFGEHALT“:

anstatt:

„Die Angabe, ein Lebensmittel habe einen hohen Ballaststoffgehalt, sowie jegliche Angabe, die für den Verbraucher voraussichtlich dieselbe Bedeutung hat, ist nur zulässig, wenn das Produkt im Fall von festen Lebensmitteln mindestens 6 g Ballaststoffe pro 100 g oder im Fall von flüssigen Lebensmitteln mindestens 3 g Ballaststoffe pro 100 kcal enthält.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Angabe, ein Lebensmittel habe einen hohen Ballaststoffgehalt, sowie jegliche Angabe, die für den Verbraucher voraussichtlich dieselbe Bedeutung hat, ist nur zulässig, wenn das Produkt mindestens 6 g Ballaststoffe pro 100 g oder mindestens 3 g Ballaststoffe pro 100 kcal enthält.“

---
#### STATE of Louisiana v. James E. GRAY.

No. 88-KH-1795.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 13, 1988.

In re Gray, James E.; applying for supervisory, remedial and writ of mandamus; Parish of Ascension, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, for prompt consideration.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WrittenStatement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906**

 

**ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency MedicalServices Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each herebycertifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)     theForm 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)     theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ William A.  Sanger |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer     |
|   | November 4, 2009       |
|   |                        |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen     |
|   | Randel G. Owen              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   | November 4, 2009       |

 

----
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 30, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0644. IMAGE PROPERTIES, LLC et al. v. FIFTH THIRD BANK.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                 List of APAC TeleServices, Inc. Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                             Jurisdiction of Formation
----                                             -------------------------
<S>                                              <C>
APAC Insurance Services Agency, Inc.             Illinois

APAC TeleServices General Partner, Inc.          Illinois

APAC TeleServices of Illinois, Inc.              Illinois

APAC TeleServices of Michigan, Inc.              Michigan

APAC TeleServices of Texas, L.P.                 Texas

APAC TeleServices, L.L.C.                        Texas

APAC TeleServices of Nevada, L.L.C.              Nevada

Paragren Technologies, Inc.                      Virginia

ITI Marketing Services, Inc.                     Delaware

ITI Holdings, Inc.                               Delaware
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7094
LEE EDWARD ELLERBEE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus M. J. MCDADE, Superintendent; PEGGY JONES, Head Nurse, Medical Staff; OFFICER KORNGAY; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-97-11-5-2-H) Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lee Edward Ellerbee, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ellerbee v. McDade , No. CA-97-11-5-2-H (E.D. Va. July 28, 1997). Even if Appellant's prior 1995 action, which raised the same allegations, tolled the limitations period, the complaint in thisappeal was filed outside the applicable three-year statute of limitations. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 35.3

TransCentra

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB
Item 1123

Pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of TransCentras activities during the year ended
December 31, 2011 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the servicing agreement between TransCentra and American Express (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under the undersigned officers
supervision. To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, TransCentra has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/ Matthew Pribus                  
|Matthew Pribus                      
|Executive VP of Strategic Operations

February 15, 2012

www.transcentra.com

tel:
678-728-2500        fax: 678-728-2501

4855 Peachtree Industrial Boulevard, Suite 245,
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Animal Cremation 3.06E-08 0.00 0.00

Asphalt Concrete Manufacturing 9.40E-02 6.96 6.96

Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing 2.34E-01 17.36 24.32

Carbon Black Production 2.45E-01 18.16 42.48

Drum and Barrel Reclamation 1.27E-06 0.00 42.48

Ferroalloy Production [1] 2.04E-02 1.51 43.99

Human Cremation 1.19E-08 0.00 43.99

Industrial Boilers 2.05E-01 15.18 59.17

Institutional/Commercial Heating 7.93E-02 5.87 65.04

Municipal Landfills 7.90E-04 0.06 65.10

Secondary Lead Smelting 1.17E-03 0.09 65.18

Sewage Sludge Incineration 8.29E-03 0.61 65.80

Stationary Internal Combustion Engines 4.62E-01 34.20 100.00

Total Emissions 1.35 100.00

Foot Notes

[1] Ferroalloy Production was named Electrometallurgical Production in the May 1999 Report

Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) as 7-PAH
September 21, 2015

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third District of Texas

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711-2547

512-463-1733

RE: COA No. 03-15-00302-CR

 Trial Court Cause No. D-1-DC-13-900252

 George DeLaCruz v. State of Texas

Dear Mr. Kyle,

This is my second request for extension in the above-entitled cause, and I would respectfully 

request a 30-day extension. I have been swamped with back to back jury trials due to trials that 

have carried over from one week to two and going straight into another jury trial, and I 

currently have the above-entitled cause on appeal along with the following records COA No. 03-

15-000424-CR, COA No. 03-15-00154-CR, COA No. 03-15-00066, COA No. 03-15-00306, and 

COA No. 03-15-00177-CR, which was transferred to the First Court of Appeals in Houston 

pending. I have enlisted help and am working every minute that I am not in court including late 

nights and every weekend and am doing the very best that I can. Due to the circumstances, I 

would request until October 21st. 

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please feel 

free to call me at 512-854-9315 or by email at Kimberly.lee@traviscountytx.gov.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Lee

Official Court Reporter

147th District Court

Travis County, Texas

512-854-9315
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, each of the undersigned principal executive officer of Dearborn Capital
Management, L.L.C., the general partner (the “General Partner”) of Grant Park
Futures Fund Limited Partnership (“Grant Park”), and principal financial officer
of the General Partner hereby certifies that:




(1)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Grant Park for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Grant Park.




Date:                      March
28, 2008




/s/David M.
      Kavanagh
              David
      M. Kavanagh
              President
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
              Dearborn
      Capital Management, L.L.C.
              General
      Partner/s/Maureen
      O’Rourke
              Maureen
      O’Rourke
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              Dearborn
      Capital Management, L.L.C.
              General
      Partner





This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Grant Park for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
Exhibit
      3.04









**AMENDMENT
      TO THE BYLAWS OF THE COMPANY**





Resolved,
      that the Board of Directors of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc., in accordance
      with
      Article  Three of the corporation's By-Laws, hereby amend Article
      Three, Section Two of the By-Laws as follows:





ARTICLE
      THREE




“SECTION
      TWO: The Board of Directors shall consist of 5 members to be elected by the
      shareholders at an annual meeting. The term of office shall be two years.
      Vacancies may be filled by the Board of Directors prior to the expiration of
      the
      term. Such appointment shall continue until the next annual meeting of
      shareholders.”








Date:
      Oct
      24, 2005





/s/
      Billy
      Wang


Billy
      Wang





/s/
      Geoffrey Wei


Geoffrey
      Wei





/s/
      Carrie Hartwick


Carrie
      Hartwick





/s/
      Victor Zhou


Victor
      Zhou





/s/
      Wilson Li


Wilson
      Li
**Exhibit        32.2**

| 3.   | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                  and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      |                                                                                       |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:                      May 18_, 2007 |                                                                                       |   |
|                                      | Asher Zwebner, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial                        Officer) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2229 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2229

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of carded cashmere 
                 of 19.35 metric yarn count or higher.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on yarn of carded cashmere 
                 of 19.35 metric yarn count or higher.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YARN OF CARDED CASHMERE OF 19.35 METRIC YARN COUNT OR 
              HIGHER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to yarn of carded cashmere of 
19.35 metric yarn count or higher) is amended by striking ``12/31/
2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```