alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
SHARE AND PER SHARE AMOUNTS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE EFFECTS
RECAPITALIZATION AND INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING IN OCTOBER 1995 AND THE SUBSEQUENT
STOCK SPLITS DESCRIBED IN NOTE 9 TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949298
<NAME> CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,605                   9,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,998                  17,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,422                  39,600
<PP&E>                                          38,188                  79,057
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,420                   5,875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,212                 234,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,715                  48,831
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           262                     263
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,531                  96,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,212                 234,014
<SALES>                                        143,316                 222,976
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               147,452                 232,118
<CGS>                                          108,965                 171,697
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,384                 195,124
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                   4,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,068                  32,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,232                  12,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,836                  20,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53                     .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53                     .77
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Malcolm FLEURY and Elliot H. Gale.

No. 87-KD-1487.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re State of Louisiana; applying for supervisory writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “E”, No. 319-225.

Granted. Transferred to 4th Circuit Court of Appeal for briefing, argument and an opinion, along with 87-KD-1484.

N.B.: The only defendant before this Court is Fleury. These filings were inappropriately given two numbers. This particular filing is by the State to stay the trial of both defendants, Fleury and Gale, a date which has long since passed.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Zandaria  Ventures  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(
         d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date:  February 14, 2007


/s/ Steven Cozine
-----------------------------------
Steven Cozine, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mystica Candle Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Candace
Sikorski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of February, 2007.


/s/ Candace Sikorski
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ABIR WOLF,

 

 Appellant,

v.

SALVADOR C. RAMIREZ,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00147-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2018DCV1155)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellee’s motion to dismiss Appellant’s request for the trial 

court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. This is an appeal from a summary judgment 

granted in favor of Appellee. It is well established that findings of fact and conclusions of law 

have no place in a summary judgment proceeding. Linwood v. NCNB Texas, 885 S.W.2d 102, 103 

(Tex. 1994). If summary judgment is proper, there are no facts to find, and the legal conclusions 

have already been stated in the motion and response. IKB Industries v. Pro-Line Corporation, 938 

S.W.2d 440, 441 (Tex. 1997). Consequently, the trial court should not make, and an appellate 

court cannot consider, findings of fact in connection with a summary judgment. IKB Industries, 

938 S.W.2d at 441. Even though the trial court should not make findings and we cannot consider 

them in deciding whether the trial court properly granted summary judgment, we are not authorized 

to “dismiss” Appellant’s request for findings and conclusions. Accordingly, Appellee’s motion is 

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1

st day of August, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### Carlos M. GOMEZ and Paulina Gomez, Appellants, v. COUNTRY CLUB APARTMENTS AT BONAVENTURE, et al., Appellees.

No. 87-1636.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 27, 1988.

Alec Ross, North Miami Beach, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.

ON REHEARING

GUNTHER, Judge.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing to clarify opinion is granted and we substitute the following opinion.

We reverse. The trial court erred in denying appellants’ motion to vacate default and in entering default judgment against appellants. The entry of default was improper since appellants’ motion to transfer/consolidate was pending before the court at the time the default was entered. Accordingly, the entry of the default and default judgment are reversed. *Harth v. Margaretten and Co.,*513 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.500(c).

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

PAUL ERNEST VARCHETTI

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE ANNE VARCHETTI

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 22

- 2996

[ November 16, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Janet C. Croom , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312019DR000482

.

Amy D. Shield and Roger Levine of Shield & Levine, P.A., Boca Raton,

for appellant.

Kevin Rollin of Napier & Rollin, PLLC, Vero Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, G ERBE R and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6299]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1816]


Reorganization/Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 106 under 
Alternative Site Framework, Oklahoma City, OK

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) in 
December 2008 (74 FR 1170-1173, 01/12/2009; correction 74 FR 3987, 01/
22/2009; 75 FR 71069-71070, 11/22/2010) as an option for the 
establishment or reorganization of general-purpose zones;
    Whereas, the Port Authority of Greater Oklahoma City, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 106, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ 
Docket 20-2011, filed 3/15/2011) for authority to reorganize and expand 
under the ASF with a service area of Blaine, Caddo, Canadian, 
Cleveland, Comanche, Custer, Garfield, Garvin, Grady, Kay, Kingfisher, 
Lincoln, Logan, McClain, Noble, Oklahoma, Payne, Pontotoc, 
Pottawatomie, Seminole and Stephens Counties, Oklahoma, within and 
adjacent to the Oklahoma City Customs and Border Protection port of 
entry, FTZ 106's existing Sites 1 (as combined with Site 8), 12 and 13 
would be categorized as magnet sites, existing Sites 2 and 14 would be 
categorized as usage-driven sites, and the grantee proposes two new 
magnet sites (Sites 15 and 16);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (76 FR 15290-15291, 3/21/2011) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 106 under the 
alternative site framework is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the 
Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, to the Board's standard 
2,000-acre activation limit for the overall general-purpose zone 
project, to a five-year ASF sunset provision for magnet sites that 
would terminate authority for Sites 12, 13, 15 and 16 if not activated 
by February 28, 2017, and to a three-year ASF sunset provision for 
usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Sites 2 and 14 if 
no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs 
purpose by February 28, 2015.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 29th day of February 2012.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
ATTEST:
 Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6299 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-143616, 333-140454, 333-112632 and 333-33786)and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-140480, 333-131740, 333-131739, 333-122035, 333-115174, 333-81870,333-72020, 333-55592, 333-30026, 333-103113, and 333-52881) of Pharmacyclics, Inc.of our report dated September 13, 2007 relating to the financial statements, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, California
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
EXHIBIT 21.1

INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
(TO BE UPDATED BY LEGAL)

The following is a list of all subsidiaries and partnership interests of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc., the percentage of ownership and the state or other jurisdiction of organization or incorporation as of December 31, 2010:



|                                                                            |  |           |       |   |              |  |            | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------- | ----- | - | ------------ |  | ---------- | 
|Name of Entity                                                              |  | Ownership |       |   | Jurisdiction | 
|Corporations                                                                |  |           |       |   |              |  |            | 
|IORI Operating, Inc.                                                        |  |           | 100.0 | % |              |  | Nevada     | 
|IORI Minerals, Inc.                                                         |  |           | 100.0 | % |              |  | Nevada     | 
|IORI Valley View, Inc.                                                      |  |           | 100.0 | % |              |  | Nevada     | 
|Midland Odessa Properties, Inc.                                             |  |           | 19.9  | % |              |  | California | 
|Transcontinental Parkway Corporation                                        |  |           | 100.0 | % |              |  | Nevada     | 
|                                                                            |  |          
|Partnerships (including direct and indirect ownership through subsidiaries) |  |           |       |   |              |  |            | 
|Metra Cross Pool 2, LP                                                      |  |           | 5.97  | % |              |  | Delaware   | 
|Metra Quail Oaks, LP                                                        |  |           | 5.97  | % |              |  | Delaware   | 
|Metra Westwood, LP                                                          |  |           | 5.97  | % |              |  | Delaware   | 
|Nakash Income Associates                                                    |  |           | 40.00 | % |              |  | Georgia    |
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 03-2323 TEN TAXPAYER CITIZENS GROUP; CAPE COD MARINE TRADES ASSOCIATION, INC.; RAOUL D. ROSS; THE MASSACHUSETTS BOATING AND YACHT CLUBS ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. CAPE WIND ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on June 28, 2004 is amended as follows: On the cover page, " Kurt W. Hague , with whom Timothy J. Dacey and Goulston & Storrs, P.C. were on brief, for appellee." should be changed to " Timothy J. Dacey , with whom Kurt W. Hague and Goulston & Storrs, P.C. were on brief, for appellee."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that an orientation and planning meeting of the District of Columbia Advisory Committee will convene at 12 p.m. on Tuesday, April 10, 2012, at the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street NW., Conference Room 540, Washington, DC 20425. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to review the rules of operation for the Advisory Committee. The purpose of the planning meeting is to plan future activities.

                    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The comments must be received in the regional office by Thursday, May 10, 2012. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to                     *ero@usccr.gov.*                     Persons who desire additional information may also contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.                

Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.

                    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site,                           ( print page 15718)    *www.usccr.gov,*                     or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above email or street address or phone number.                

The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Dated in Washington, DC, March 12, 2012.

Peter Minarik,

Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.

[FR Doc. 2012-6376 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Katherine A. STAMPER.

No. 87-K-2304.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Stamper, Katherine A.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. *12518889-KA; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 44242.

Prior report: La.App., 513 So.2d 434.

Denied.
SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART

1

Attachment “A” to Settlement Agreement

Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson

Case No. 3:10-cv-04060 State SA ¶ 110(a)(2) Requirements * SIP Identification** Maryland 3 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 0011; 0011.1; 0011.2; 0011.3; 0011.4; 0011.5;
0011.6

Arkansas 3 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 0028; 0028.1

Virginia 5 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). December 10, 2007, Letter from David K. Paylor, Director of VADEQ,
and enclosure “State Implementation Plan 110(a)(2) Requirements for Ozone”;

December 13, 2007, Letter from David K. Paylor, Director of VADEQ,
and enclosure “Status of 110(a)(2)Requirements in the Virginia State Implementation Plan”
Oklahoma 5 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (K), (L), and (M). 0031

Florida 7 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). 0015

Arizona 8 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2) (A)–(C), (E), (F) & (H)-(M) October 14, 2009, Letter from Benjamin H. Grumbles, Director ADEQ,
“Re: Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision Under Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) and (2); 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS and
1997 8-hour Ozone NAAQS.” Georgia 10 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). 0016; 0041SIP IDENTIFICATION CHART

2

Attachment “A” to Settlement Agreement

Sierra Club et al., v. Jackson

Case No. 3:10-cv-04060 * This Settlement Agreement only obligates EPA to ac t on the requirements re garding the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS addressed in the 2008 Findi ngs Notice or other submissions c ited in this chart. This does not include 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and 110(a)(2)(I) and portions of section 110(a)(2)(C) pertaining to nonattainment area requirements.

** 

### Unless otherwise specified, this is the Document ID from the docket for our 2008 completeness findings, Docket No. EPA-HQ-OA R-2007-1173, or the date of the submission. The docket may be accessed online at http://www.regulations.gov

. Tennessee 11,12 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). 0021; May 28, 2009, Submission by Barry Stephens, Technical Secretary for TDEC, “Official Submittal Request for State Implementation Plan
Revisions to 1200-3-9-.01 Construction Permits; 1200-3-9-.02 Operating Permits; and 1200-3-9-.03
General Provisions”

North Carolina 14 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). 0019; 0019.1; 0019.2

Nevada 14 42 U.S.C. § 7410(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(ii), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J),(K), (L), and (M). February 1, 2008, Letter from Leo M. Drozdoff, Administrator NDEP, with enclosures regarding “CAA 110(a)(2)(A)-(M) Requirements in the
Current Nevada State Implementation Plan for 8-
hour Ozone”
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**WrittenStatement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuantto Section 906**

 

**ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)**

 

  Theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer ofEmergency Medical Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)            the Form 10-Q of theCompany for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed on the datehereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)           the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ William A. Sanger                     |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    August 7, 2008 |
|   |                                      |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                        |
|   | Randel G. Owen                            |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                   |
|   | August 7, 2008                            |

 

40

----