alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Urbie Melbourne, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

CRIMINAL LAW — APPELLATE PRACTICE — WRIT OF ERROR DOES NOT LIE UNLESS; THERÉ IS A.FINAL JUDGMENT OR SENTENCE — RECORD PROPER MUST CONTAIN JUDGMENT— JUDGMENT;EXHIBITED..ONLY BY BILL OF EXCEPTIONS CANNoVbE RECOGNIZED. -

1. In appellate proceedings the record proper in a criminal case.. must show' a finai judgment or sentence in order to support a writ of error.

2. The verdict and judgment or sentence in a criminal case from parts of tbe record proper in appellate proceedings, and have no place in a bill of exceptions certified by tbe judge, and when exhibited to an appellate court only in and by a bill of exceptions can not be recognized.

3. The record proper in a cause, and all matter properly belonging thereto, can be authoritatively evidenced to an appel- ; late court only by a transcript containing them duly certified by the clerk of the court who is tbe custodian of such records.

This case was decided by Division B.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Monroe County.

*114i The facts in thg^gase aré stated in the opinion of the Court.

*Louis A. Karris,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*Ellis,*Attorney-General, for the State.

Per Curiam.

This cause came on for final adjudication before Division B of the court upon the transcript of record and- briefs of counsel for the plaintiff in error Upon, investigation the court finds that in the *record proper*there is no verdict or final judgment from which a writ of error ViU lie. In the *bill of exceptions*there is set out' what purports to be a verdict of conviction and judgment or sentence, but thus evidenced this court cannot recognize them,. A verdict and the judgment or sentence in a criminal case form parta of the *record proper*in appellate proceedings, and have no place in a bill of exceptions certified by the judge, and when exhibited to an appellate court only in and by a bill of exceptions can uoLbe recognized. The *record proper*in a cause and all matter properly belonging thereto can be authoritatively evidenced to an appellate court only by a transcript containing them duly, certified by the clerk of the court who is the custodian of such records. Merchants’ Nat. Bank of Jacksonville v. Grunthal, 38 Fla. 93, 20 South. Rep. 809. The writ of error herein must, therefore, be, and is hereby dismissed, but'without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff in' error to sue out another writ of error. The plaintiff iñ error being showq. to be insolvent the costs of this writ of error to be taxed against the county of Monroe.

Taylor, Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur.

Shackleford, G. J., and Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur in the opinion.
#### Anthony MACCHIROLE, Appellant/Cross Appellee, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

No. 4-86-0048.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1987.

Lawrence N. Rosen and Michael J. Rosen of Rosen & Rosen, P.A., Miami, for appellant/cross appellee.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee/cross appellant.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the conviction but vacate the sentence constituting a downward departure from the sentencing guidelines and remand for resentencing and compliance with *State v. Jackson,*478 So.2d 1054 (Fla. 1985).

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Section 1350 Certification



I, Ronald L. Roswell, Sr., Chief Financial Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: April 14, 2004



By:

/s/ Ronald L. RoswellRonald L. RoswellChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

# AGENCY:

Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of Document Availability.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice announces the availability of “SSBCI National Standards: Compliance and Oversight for Participating States”.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         May 15, 2012                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Copies of the document are available at the SSBCI Web site at                         *www.treasury.gov/​ssbci.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information should be directed to Deputy Director, SSBCI, Department of the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20220.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The “SSBCI National Standards: Compliance and Oversight for Participating States” are applicable to all states, territories, the District of Columbia, and municipalities that were approved by Treasury to participate in the SSBCI (“Participating States”). The list of Participating States is available here on the SSBCI Web site at                     *www.treasury.gov/​ssbci.*                     These national standards provide Participating States with a recommended framework for identifying, monitoring, and managing SSBCI compliance and oversight risks. These national standards for compliance also provide guidance on mitigating specific risks that SSBCI believes are high-potential for all approved state programs. For each risk, SSBCI recommends specific best practices and mitigation techniques for Participating States that will supplement and inform the oversight duties imposed on Participating States by the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-240) (the “Act”), the Allocation Agreement, and the SSBCI Policy Guidelines. This document is published under the authority in Section 3009(a)(2) of the Act, which requires the Secretary of the Treasury to establish                           ( print page 15846)                        minimum national standards for state programs approved under the Act.                

Robert Dahl,

Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-6412 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
EXHIBIT 12.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Bovard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,

summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 31, 2005



John Bovard

By: /s/ "John Bovard"

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



93
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Calvin Turner, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, J.), rendered November 3, 1989, convicting defendant after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, sentencing him to 3 to 6 years incarceration, unanimously affirmed.

While on uniformed patrol, at approximately 6:00 a.m. police officers heard a scream, made their way to a stairwell landing in a nearby apartment building, where they observed defendant and a female; when defendant made eye contact with them, he fled. When he was apprehended moments later, defendant took a swing at one of the officers, and was arrested. Defendant’s hands were handcuffed behind his back, and a preliminary frisk for weapons was unproductive. A subsequent patdown outside of the building turned up glassine envelopes, which the police assumed explained defendant’s flight. The search then was terminated, and defendant was transported to the precinct in the back of the patrol car, with his hands handcuffed behind his back. As defendant was helped out of the patrol car at the precinct, he was observed dropping a glassine envelope into the rear seat of the patrol car. The 107 vials found within this envelope ultimately tested positive for cocaine.

*382Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The jury clearly credited the testimony of the police officers. Although defendant challenges their credibility on appeal by questioning the failure to recover the contraband during previous patdowns, and noting that defendant’s hands were cuffed behind his back in the patrol car, we find no basis to disturb the jury’s conclusions. Nor do we find any basis to set aside the verdict as against the weight of the evidence. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Gregory K. Roeper, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information ;and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 29, 2005                                                      /s/ Gregory K. Roeper   Gregory K. Roeper   Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE, Debtor. In the Matter of The Appeals of HUNT, HILL & BETTS, Appellants, and Bennet, House & Couts, Appellants. Munson Line, Incorporated, Appellee.

No. 192.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Dec. 26, 1939.

Hunt, Hill *&*Betts, of New York City, pro se.

Bennet, House & Couts, of New York City (William S. Bennet, Victor House, and Samuel H. Levinkind, all of New York City, of counsel), pro se.

Lowell M. Birrell, of New York City (Lloyd C. Hartman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Orders affirmed.
#### Kimberly Nell Hamm McADORY v. James Edward McADORY, Jr.

No. 93-CA-0096.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 16, 1993.

G. Jyles Eaves, Eaves & Eaves, Louisville, for appellant.

J. Niles McNeel, McNeel & Ballard, Louisville,, for appellee.

Appeal No. 15970 from Judgment dated January 15,1993; Edward C. Prisock Ruling Judge, Winston County Chancery Court.

Before PRATHER, P.J., and PITTMAN and McRAE, JJ.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2236 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2236

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags for toys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain bags for toys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPENSION ON CERTAIN BAGS FOR TOYS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.78 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain bags for toys) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.1**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical ServicesCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), each hereby certifiesthat, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thefiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|   | /s/ William A. Sanger                |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                    |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  May 4, 2007 |
|   |                                 |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                   |
|   | Randel G. Owen                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   | May 4, 2007                          |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 US BioEnergy Corporation
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of US BioEnergy Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/    Gordon W. OmmenGordon W. OmmenChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)