alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1520
<ALLOWANCES>                                       103
<INVENTORY>                                       1032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4532
<PP&E>                                            5766
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2851
<BONDS>                                            290<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        277
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                        5318
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10312
<SALES>                                           6758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6893
<CGS>                                             2031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1199<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1016
<INCOME-TAX>                                       325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                691
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31
<FN>
<F1>Does not include guarantee of ESOP debt of $218.
<F2>Only includes R&D expense.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| (1) | the      quarterly report on Form 10Q of Marley Coffee Inc. for the quarter ended      October 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marley      Coffee Inc. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ Shane      Whittle                                                      Shane      WhittlePresident,      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial      Officer(Principal      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  Officer) |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLUE WAVE SYSTEMS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND FOR THE YEAR
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,753
<ALLOWANCES>                                       137
<INVENTORY>                                      6,231
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,664
<PP&E>                                          10,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,974
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           162
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,410
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,868
<SALES>                                         34,828
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,828
<CGS>                                           15,791
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  77
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                       317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,837
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel. 

The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should inform the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Neural Interfaces: Improving Functional Outcomes.                     

*Date:*                         March 22, 2012.                     

*Time:*                         2 p.m. to 4 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To provide concept review of proposed concept review.                               ( print page 14025)    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                         *Contact Person:*                         Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, Md 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680,                         *skandasa@mail.nih.gov*.                     

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. 

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: March 2, 2012. 

Jennifer S. Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-5676 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Cheryl MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2669.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 2, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol M. Dittmar, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant Martin challenges her judgment and sentences resulting from the entry of no contest pleas to possession of cocaine, carrying a concealed firearm, and possession of a firearm by a felon. Upon entering her pleas, appellant reserved the right to appeal the trial court’s order denying her motion to suppress. Appellant contends that she was improperly detained, thereby rendering her subsequent arrest, and the search and seizure of the evidence leading to her convictions illegal. She maintains that therefore, the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. We agree.

*261The arresting officer testified to the following observations: (1) appellant was in an area known for street level sales of cocaine; (2) appellant was sitting on a porch with two known drug dealers; (3) appellant walked toward a vehicle, and back to the porch then back to the vehicle; and (4) appellant got into the back seat of the vehicle, which started to leave when the officer approached.

This court has recently held that presence in a high crime area, walking away from the police in a high crime area, and presence with a companion who is a known drug dealer, even when taken together, do not create a founded suspicion of criminal activity justifying a temporary detention. *Mosley v. State,*519 So.2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

When comparing the bases which the officer had in the present case for stopping appellant to those of the officer in *Mosley,*the sole additional factor here is that appellant was observed walking to a vehicle, returning to the porch, returning to the vehicle, and entering the vehicle when she saw the officer approach. The officer never observed anything pass from appellant to the occupants of the vehicle or vice versa. He merely observed appellant speaking to the occupants. This additional factor alone does not alter the result which was reached in *Mosley,*that the detention was improper.

As a consequence of the illegal detention here, the seizure of the cocaine and firearm found during the subsequent search of appellant, is likewise invalid. *Wong Sun v. United States,*371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). Both items of evidence should, therefore, have been suppressed. *Id.*

We reverse appellant's judgment and sentences and remand with instructions that appellant be discharged.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

#### CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

####  

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Safety Products Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David F. Myers, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: May 12, 2008 |   | By:    | /s/ DAVID F. MYERS, JR.                            |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   |   | David F. Myers, Jr.                           |
|                     |   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                     |   |   | Secretary and Director                             |
|                     |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4023-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2012-0002]


Connecticut; Amendment No. 5 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for State of Connecticut (FEMA-4023-DR), dated September 2, 2011, and 
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: February 29, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Albert Lewis, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Stephen M. DeBlasio Sr. 
as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-6362 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
# L_2006207EN.01002601.xml

| 28.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 207/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 207/26

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1153/2006

of 27 July 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 21 to 27 July 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 28 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 24 , 2014

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00315

- CV

WALTER P. MOORE & AS SOCIATES, INC. , Appellant

V.

KENNEDY ASSOCIATES/A RCHITECTS, INC. D/B/ A KAI DESIGN AND BUILD; KAI CONSTRUCT ION SERVICES, LLC D/ B/A KAI CONSTRUCTION, A MISS OURI LIMITED LIABILI TY CORPORATION; AND KAI ALLIANCE, LC D/B/A KAI TEXAS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 45414

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 26, 2014 . On July 15, 2014, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, th e appeal is ordered dismissed.2 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Busby, Donovan and Brown.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies that, to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Cape Fear Bank Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Betty V. Norris    
|                        |  | Betty V. Norris        
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5

TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 

1 United States v. Huskey, 137 F.3d 283 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Sotelo, 97 F.3d

782 (5th Cir. 1996).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40467

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO GARZA, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(M-97-CR-142-2)

September 2, 1999

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Pedro Garza pleaded guilty to one count of alien transporting. Garza appeals

hissentence, contending that the district court erred by increasing his offense level

for using a minor to commit the offense.

At sentencing, both Garza and the minor allegedly used in the offense

testified. The district court found neither to be credible.1 In addition, the testimony
2

of other witnesses supported the imposition of the enhancement. We find no

reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.