alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T HE U NITED B UILDING

77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

C HICAGO

, IL 60601 D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY

P HONE /F AX : ( 312) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

July 13, 2012

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

Department of Tran sportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Application o f United and SkyWest for Exemptions and Designations

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0113 (Chicago , Illinois

- Monterrey, Mexico)

Dear M r. Gretch :

United has completed its poll of carrier r epresentativ es i n the attached service list. No carrier

objects to the grant of United and SkyWest’ s application for exemptions and designations to

serve the Chicago , Illinois

- Monterrey, Mexico route . United ask s that th e requested authorit ies

be awarded promptly so that the carriers can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans

and begin marketing their services in this route

.

Respectful ly submitted

,

D an W eiss

Managing Director, International Affairs & Regulatory

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

cc: Esta Rosenberg

Brian Hedberg

Todd EmersonCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causi ng a copy to be sent via email.

mssinick@ssd.com

carl.nelson@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

james.kaleigh@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.co m

jhill@dowlohnes.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com leslie.abbott@wnco.com

dkirste in@yklaw.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

jegillick@zsrlaw.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

william.stallings@usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen@faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña

International Regulatory Advisor

July 13, 2012
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10214

Conference Calendar

__________________

REGINALD JEROME HALL,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DALLAS COUNTY POLICE,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:95-CV-168-R

- - - - - - - - - -

June 30, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Reginald Jerome Hall, proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis, filed this civil rights suit against the Dallas

County Police on January 25, 1995. He alleges that he was

injured by a Dallas County police officer during his arrest on

October 20, 1992. He argues that the applicable statute of

limitations period was tolled as a result of his incarceration.

A district court may dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint

as frivolous if it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in

fact. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1733-34 (1992);
No. 95-10214

-2-

Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). If it appears

"that insufficient factual allegations might be remedied by more

specific pleading," this court considers whether the district

court abused its discretion by dismissing the complaint without

affording any effort to amend. Eason, 14 F.3d at 9. 

Federal courts apply state personal-injury limitations

periods to actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Owens v. Okure, 488

U.S. 235, 251 (1989). The applicable Texas limitations period is

two years. Burrell v. Newsome, 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir.

1989). Hall's claim accrued on October 25, 1992, the date that

he was allegedly injured by police. As of September 1, 1987,

imprisonment no longer tolls the limitations period in Texas. 

Rodriguez v. Holmes, 963 F.2d 799, 803 (5th Cir. 1992). The

limitations period therefore expired on October 25, 1994, two

years after Hall's injury and some three months before Hall filed

suit on January 25, 1995. Accordingly, the district court did

not abuse its discretion, and Hall's appeal is DISMISSED as

frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International, Inc. and
subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I Roger F. Hruby, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



     /s/ _________________________________________Roger F. Hruby
     Name:        Roger F. Hruby
     Title:       Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer
     Date:        March 21, 2003

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2349

To reduce temporarily the duty on frames and mountings for spectacles, 
            goggles, or the like, the foregoing of plastics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on frames and mountings for spectacles, 
            goggles, or the like, the foregoing of plastics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRAMES AND MOUNTINGS FOR SPECTACLES, GOGGLES, OR THE LIKE, 
              THE FOREGOING OF PLASTICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Frames and          2.3%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        mountings for                                                      31/2011.......
                        spectacles,
                        goggles, or the
                        like, the
                        foregoing of
                        plastics
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9003.11.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit13.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,**

**CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DRAXIS Health Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | Dated: March 30, 2007 | /s/ MARTIN BARKIN                      |
|--------|-----------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   |                  | Martin Barkin, M.D.                    |
|   |                  | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.

----
### Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issued April 14,2000

In The 

### tourt ofAppeals 

## Jfftftlj Utstrttt of Qtexaa at Dallas No. 05-99-01287-CR MICHAEL ANDREW FAILS, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

### On Appealfrom the County Criminal Court No. 8 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB99-50137-J OPINION PER CURIAM Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill 

### Appellanthas filed amotion towithdraw the appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved the motion. 

### This Court hereby GRANTS themotion and ORDERS theappeal withdrawn and that this decision be certified below for observance. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). PER CURIAM Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47

### Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issuedApril 14, 2000

In The 

### Court of Appeals 

## Jfftttlj Htstriri of Qfexaa at SJallas No. 05-99-01287-CR MICHAEL ANDREW FAILS, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

### On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 8 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB99-50137-J OPINION PER CURIAM Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill 

## Appellanthas filed amotionto withdraw the appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved the motion. 

### This Courthereby GRANTS the motion and ORDERS theappeal withdrawn and that this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R App. P. 42.2(a). PER CURIAM Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

### Appeal Ordered Withdrawn and Opinion issuedApril 14, 2000

In The 

## Court of Appeals Jfftfth. Utstrttt of Qtexas at Dallas No. 05-99-01287-CR MICHAEL ANDREW FADLS, Appellant V. STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

### On Appealfrom the County Criminal Court No. 8 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MB99-50137-J OPINION PER CURIAM Before ChiefJustice Thomas and Justices Kinkeade and O'Neill 

### Appellanthas filed amotion towithdraw the appeal. Appellant's counsel has approved the motion. 

### This Court hereby GRANTS themotion and ORDERStheappeal withdrawn and that this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). PER CURIAM Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

h0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144729

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144729

COA: 307410

Wayne CC: 10

- 007456

- FC

CALVIN ALI ECKFORD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2012

order of the Court of Appe als is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### WALT DISNEY WORLD CO., a Delaware corporation and Columbia Casualty Company and Lloyds of London, Petitioners, v. Marietta GOODE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joel Goode, on behalf of Marietta Goode, individually, and Harry Goode, individually, Respondents.

No. 70054.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 25, 1988.

John L. O’Donnell, Jr. and Thomas B. DeWolf of DeWolf, Ward & Morris, P.A., Orlando, for petitioners.

Freidin & Hirsh, P.A., Miami, and Joel D. Eaton of Podhurst, Orseck, Parks, Josefs-berg, Eaton, Meadow & Olin, P.A., Miami, for respondents.

C. Rufus Pennington, III of Margol & Pennington, P.A., Jacksonville, amicus curiae for The Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers.

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review *Walt Disney World Co. v. Goode,*501 So.2d 622 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), because of apparent conflict with decisions of other district courts of appeal. Upon closer examination, we find that the alleged conflict cases are distinguishable and we lack jurisdiction. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

OVERTON, J., concurs in result only.

McDOÑALD, C.J., dissents.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE COURT. SEE FLA.R.APP.P. 9.330(d).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Randall J.
Fagundo, the Chief Executive Officer of American Coin Merchandising, Inc. (the
"Company"), and W. John Cash, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his respective knowledge:

1.       The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
         December 31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit
         99.1 (the "Annual Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) and Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
         as amended; and

2.       The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of
         December 31, 2002 and the results of operations of the Company for the
         year ended December 31, 2002.

Dated: March 28, 2003


    /s/ Randall J. Fagundo                   /s/ W. John Cash
    ---------------------------------        -----------------------------------
    Randall J. Fagundo                       W. John Cash
    Chief Executive Officer                  Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Robert MYLES v. Hon. Frank C. BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 87-KH-0410.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Myles, Robert; applying for writ of habeas corpus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 265-242.

Denied. Repetitive. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(D).
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our reports dated January 28, 2004 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule includedin the Annual Report of PECO II, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of PECO II, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-46246, effectiveSeptember 20, 2000 and File No. 333-48690 effective October 26, 2000). 

 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

 

Cleveland, Ohio

March 29, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6457]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7826]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Making a Presence: F. Holland Day in Artistic 
Photography''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Making a Presence: F. Holland Day in 
Artistic Photography,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Addison Gallery of American Art, Phillips 
Academy, Andover, Massachusetts from on or about March 27, 2012, until 
on or about July 31, 2012; the Bowdoin College Museum of Art, 
Brunswick, Maine from on or about September 6, 2012 until on or about 
December 23, 2012; and the Sheldon Memorial Art Gallery at the 
University of Nebraska-Lincoln from February 4, 2012 until on or about 
April 28, 2013; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined; is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 12, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-6457 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORTI, Jimmy S.H. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of Mercer International Inc. (the “Company”), certifypursuant to Section 906 of the *Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the*Securities Exchange Act of 1934*(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:May 6, 2008     /s/ Jimmy S.H. Lee     Jimmy S.H. Lee  Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MercerInternational Inc. and will be retained by Mercer International Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2325 

To suspend temporarily the duty on loudspeakers not mounted in their 

enclosures. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. KIRK, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on loudspeakers not 

mounted in their enclosures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LOUDSPEAKERS NOT MOUNTED IN THEIR EN4 CLOSURES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2325 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Loudspeakers not mounted in 

their enclosures (provided for 

in subheading 8518.29.80), 

the foregoing which meet a 

performance standard of not 

more than 1.5 dB for the average level of 3 or more octave bands, when such loudspeakers are tested in a reverberant chamber according 

to Institute of Electronics 

and Engineers (IEEE) 

Standard 219–1975 and 

International Electrotechnical 

Commission (IEC) Standard 

60268–5 ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Vital Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2009
(the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 19, 2009



/s/ Michael Levine
-----------------------------------------
    Michael Levine,
    Chief Executive Officer and
    Principal Executive Officer


Date: June 19, 2009



By: /s/ Henry Goldberg
-----------------------------------------
        Henry Goldberg
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Principal Financial Officer
        and Principal Accounting Officer



<PAGE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CHESTER J. BUTTONOW, III

, Appellant,

v.

STATE 0F FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D 2 02 3

- 0738

[ January 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County; Robert Diaz, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2021CT012302A.

Russell J. Williams of Williams Hilal Wigand Grande PLLC, Fort

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-08437  and  333-98819  on Form S-8 of our report  dated  February  14, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Vodavi Technology, Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of and for the years  ended  December  31, 2002 and 2001 (which
report  expresses an  unqualified  opinion and includes  explanatory  paragraphs
relating  to (i)  the  adoption  of a new  accounting  principle  and  (ii)  the
application of procedures  relating to certain other disclosures  related to the
2000 consolidated  financial statements that were audited by other auditors who
have ceased  operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form
of  assurance  other than with  respect to such  disclosures)  appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vodavi  Technology,  Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended December 31, 2002.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona
   March 28, 2003