alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In re the MARRIAGE OF Margaret Anne GREINER, Appellant, and Floyd D. Greiner, Appellee.

No. 83CA1175.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Nov. 14, 1985.

Ralph B. Rhodes, Denver, for appellant.

Bayer, Carey & McGee, P.C., Raymond G. Carey, Jr., Denver, for appellee.

METZGER, Judge.

Margaret Anne Greiner, wife, appeals the trial court’s order finding her in contempt for failure to pay certain marital debts pursuant to its permanent orders which incorporated the parties’ property settlement. We affirm.

Wife argues that the trial court erred in finding that she intentionally chose not to earn income notwithstanding her capability to do so. She also contends that the trial court erred in considering her potential earning power in determining her present ability to pay. We disagree.

The determination of contempt is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on review absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion. *In re Marriage of Harris,*670 P.2d 446 (Colo.App.1983). There was no such abuse here.

*717The trial court found that wife had made minimal efforts at best to secure and maintain employment after the dissolution, and that she had consistently referred her creditors to her former husband. The trial court further found that she had a Ph.D., was a licensed clinical psychologist, and was capable of earning approximately $5,000 per month. Those findings are supported by the record and will not be disturbed on review. *Page v. Clark,*197 Colo. 306, 592 P.2d 792 (1979).

If we were to adopt wife’s theory that earning ability cannot be considered by a trial court in an enforcement proceeding, then parties could disobey the provisions of permanent orders with impunity and frustrate the debt payment provisions of their property settlement agreements. As we noted in *In re Marriage of McCarthy,*533 P.2d 928 (Colo.App.1975) (not selected for official publication), a party “is free to choose his own lifestyle and to cease to be a productive individual in our social structure if he can afford such luxury. However, ... certain responsibilities assumed must be met within the confines of the law.”

Accordingly, the judgment of contempt is affirmed.

BERMAN and TURSI, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31(b) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED I, David E. Mangum, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CheckFree
Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 3, 2004 /s/ David E. MangumDavid E. MangumExecutive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
CheckFree Corporation
<PAGE>


                                                                Exhibit 23.1
                                          
                                          
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                          
                                          
                                          

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus 
constituting part of the registration statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 
333-41165, and 333-37341) and in the registration statements on Form S-8 
(Nos. 333-14373, and 333-25973) of North American Scientific, Inc. of our 
report dated January 19, 1998, appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-KSB.





/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Costa Mesa, California 
January 28, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7059
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD NELSON, a/k/a Ronnie, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-57-H, CA-97-263) Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997 Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).Appellant raises issues for the first time on appeal, and we decline to address these issues. See Muth v. United States , 1 F.3d246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nelson , Nos. CR94-57-H; CA-97-263 (E.D.N.C. June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15745-15746]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6415]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee 
(ASRAC): Correction

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Establishment of the Appliance Standards and 
Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) and Solicitation of 
Nominations for Membership; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published in the Federal 
Register on March 8, 2012, a notice of Establishment of the Appliance 
Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC) and 
Solicitation of Nominations for Membership. The notice contained 
incorrect language. As a result, the language is being corrected in 
this notice.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of March 8, 2012, in FR DOC. 2012-5661, on 
pages 14008-14009, please make the following corrections:
    In the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION heading, page 14009, second 
column, first paragraph, seventh line, please remove the language, 
``minorities, women'', and add in its place ``the needs of women and 
men of all racial and ethnic groups''.


[[Page 15746]]


    Issued in Washington, DC on March 12, 2012.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6415 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
**EXHIBIT 12.1**STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                       **2005**  **2004**  **2003**  **2002**  **2001** Income (loss) fromcontinuingoperations $31,628  $25,587  $15,321  $2,041  $(26,037)Add fixed charges  42,229   31,455   34,662   33,893   32,055                 Earnings (as defined) $73,857  $57,042  $49,983  $35,934  $6,018                 Fixed charges:                    Interest expense  4,467   5,139   5,223   4,690   5,981 Amortization ofdebt issuance costs  369   568   943   258   197 Estimated interestcomponent of rentexpenses  37,393   25,748   28,496   28,945   25,877                 Total fixed charges $42,229  $31,455  $34,662  $33,893  $32,055                 Ratio of earnings tofixed charges (1)  1.75x   1.81x   1.45x   1.06x     Deficiency inearnings to coverfixed charges                 $26,037  (1) The “ratio of earnings to fixed charges” represents earnings divided by fixed charges, asdefined in the following paragraph. The “deficiency” represents the amount of fixed charges inexcess of earnings.For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of earnings(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and change in accounting principle plus fixedcharges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, amortization of debt issuance costs, andone-third of rent expense, which is deemed to be representative of interest expense.
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*GARY OLIVER

*J. Brendan Sharkey,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Ellen A. Jawitz,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 41 (AC 15854), is denied.
#### Terry Lynn STREETER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-1671.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 2, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation based on violation of conditions one, two and ten of the probation order. Although the reference to violation of condition five was later deleted because of lack of evidence, the deletion was after the notice of appeal herein was filed. We remand for formal striking of the reference to violation of condition five. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Todd N. Boren, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on
my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of
New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).



|       |  |                                                                                                                  
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  |  | March 27, 2015                                                                                                   
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Todd N. Boren                                                                                                
|Name:  |  | Todd N. Boren                                                                                                    
|Title: |  | President American Express Receivables
Financing Corporation III LLC (senior officer in charge of securitization)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6729

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PHILLIP ANTONIO OWENS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-93-50, CA-96-666-2)

Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Antonio Owens, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Owens, Nos. CR-93-50; CA-96-666-2 (M.D.N.C. May 2,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

William Earl Stirman, * From the 238th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR38912.

Vs. No. 11-12-00090-CR * March 31, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 Memorandum Concurring Opinion

 by Willson, J. 

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22 - 0088 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LEWIS LEON BRYSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2022

09/02/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0088
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

            Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

I, Warren B. Kanders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: July 20, 2006
                                                By: /s/ Warren B. Kanders
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Name:    Warren B. Kanders
                                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2118-2119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7754]


In the Matter of the Designation of al-Qa'ida Kurdish Battalions 
(AQKB), Also Known as Kurdistan Brigades, Also Known as Kurdistan 
Battalion of Islamic State in Iraq, Also Known as Kurdistan Brigade of 
al-Qaeda in Iraq, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant 
to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as al-Qa'ida Kurdish 
Battalions (AQKB), also known as Kurdistan Brigades, also known as, 
Kurdistan Battalion of Islamic State in Iraq, also known as Kurdistan 
Brigade of al-Qaeda in Iraq, committed, or poses a significant risk of 
committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.

[[Page 2119]]

    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 3, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-607 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
## Page 1of1

Subject: 

### Notice of Maryland Certification for Clean AIr- Act Section 11O(a) (2), Ozone Infrastructure SIP**r--~-Gfeated** 

### By: iwilkinson@mde.state.md.us Scheduled Date: Creation Date: 

### 11/14/2012307 PM L..----.:F""r-o...lm: Jim 

### Wilkinson Recipient Action Date 

### & Time Comment

To: aILmirzakhalili@state.de.us (ali.mirzakhalili@state.de.us) Transferred 11/14/20123:10 PM CC: Angelo Bianca (abianca@mde.state.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 

### .' 11/15/2012401 AM To:, bill.o'sLlllivan@dep.stale.nj.us (bill:o'sullivan@dep.state.nj.us) ;. Delivered 11/14/20123:14 PM

CC: Brian Hug (bhug@mde.state.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/20124:05AM To: cecily.beall@dc.gov (cecily.beall@dc.gov) Transferred 11/14/20123:07 PM CC: Debbie Rabin (drabin@mde.stale.md.us) Read 11/15/201210:31 AM CC Diane Franks (dfranks@mde.state.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/2012413AM CC: frankford.harold@epa.gov (frankford.harold@epa.gov) Transferred 11/14/2012308 PM 2.0.0 message relayed To: JohnABenedict@wv.gov (John.A.Benedicl@wv.gov) Transferred 11/14/2012307 PM CC: Mary Jane Rutkowski (mrutkowski@mde.state.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11115/20124:37AM To: mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov (mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov) Transferred 11/14/2012307 PM CC: Molla Sarros (MSarros@mde.slale.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/20124:38AM CC: powers.marilyn@epa.gov (powers.marilyn@epa.gov) Transferred 11/14/20123:08 PM 2.0.0 message relayed To: ranbordner@state.pa.us (ranbordner@state.pa.us) Transferred 11/14/20123:08 PM CC: RogerThunell (rthunell@mde.slale.md.us) Read 11/16/2012148 PM BC: Sally Frampton (sframpton@mde.stale.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/20124:47AM CC: Tad Aburn (gaburn@mde.state.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/2012418AM CC: TimothyWallace (twallace@mde.slate.md.us) Third-Party Downloaded 11/15/2012452AM



## file:///C:fUsers/jwilkinson/AppData/Localffemp/XPgrpwise/50A3B3BBMDEDOMpo2li,.. 11/30/2012