alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.31


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PROMISSORY NOTE BETWEEN VIRPAX PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC. AND ANTHONY P. MACK 


 


This Second Amendment to the Promissory Note dated January 15,
2019 (“Second Amendment”) is entered into as of October 28, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) between Virpax
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (“Virpax”) and Anthony P. Mack (“AM”). Virpax and AM may be collectively referred
to herein as the “Parties.”


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain Promissory Note
dated January 15, 2019 (the “Note”) which described the terms under which AM would loan certain amounts to Virpax the
terms under which Virpax would repay such amounts; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties entered into that certain first amendment
to the Note dated April 6, 2020 which extended the Maturity Date of the payment of the principal and provides for the payment of
all interest accrued up to October 1, 2020; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Note, as amended, in
order to extend the Maturity Date of the payment of the principal and provide for the payment of all interest accrued up to December
31, 2023.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the Parties in consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements hereinafter set forth agree as follows:


 


1. The Note is hereby amended as follows:


 


		1.	Amend Article 1 to extend the Maturity Date of the payment of the principal to December 31, 2023. 



 


		2.	Amend Article 2 to provide for the payment of all interest accrued up to December 31, 2023.



 


Except as amended hereby, all of the terms and conditions of
the Note are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment
to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Effective Date. 


 


	By:	/s/ Jeffrey Gudin	 
	Name: 	Jeffrey Gudin, EVP, Chief Medical Officer	 


 


	By the Holder: 	/s/ Anthony P. Mack	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Anthony P. Mack, Chairman & CEO
WALTON COUNTY, WALTON 

COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY 

COMMISSIONERS, WAYNE 

DYESS, AND BILLY 

BEARDEN,

Appellants,

v.

SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS, 

LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED 

LIABILITY COMPANY,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2533

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 14, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Walton County.

Kelvin C. Wells, Judge.

Mark D. Davis and Sidney N. Noyes, Office of the County Attorney, DeFuniak 

Springs, for Appellants.

Dana C. Matthews, Scott M. Work, and Dana C. Matthews II of Matthews & 

Jones, LLP, Destin, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks review of a non-final order granting Appellee’s request for a

temporary injunction. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this 

opinion. 

As this Court has previously held, the issuance of a temporary injunction is 

an extraordinary remedy which must be based on a showing of the following 

criteria: “(1) the likelihood of irreparable harm; (2) the unavailability of an 

adequate remedy at law; (3) substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) 

considerations of public interest.” Tom v. Russ, 752 So. 2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2000) (citing Spradley v. Old Harmony Baptist Church, 721 So. 2d 735, 737 

(Fla. 1st DCA 1998)). Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, a trial 

court’s order granting injunctive relief must “specify the reasons for the entry” of 

the injunction. This Court has emphasized that “[c]lear, definite, and 

unequivocally sufficient factual findings must support each of the four conclusions 

necessary to justify entry of a preliminary injunction.” Spradley, 721 So. 2d at 737 

(quoting City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Adver. Co., 634 So. 2d 750, 754 

(Fla. 1st DCA 1994)). 

The order on appeal failed to address any of the four criteria necessary for 

the issuance of an injunction and failed to set forth any factual findings in support 

of the required criteria. Accordingly, we remand with instructions to the trial court 

2
to either enter an order that satisfies all the requirements for entry of a temporary 

injunction or, if appropriate, an order denying the injunction.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., CONCUR.

3
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND

* COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

v.

* Misc. Docket AG No. 9 7

ROBERT ANDREW MITCHELL * September Term, 20 21

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition o f the Attorney Grievance Commission of

Maryland and the Respondent, Robert Andrew Mitchell , to suspend the Respondent from the

practice of law in Maryland for 60 days , stayed in favor of on e year of probation with terms

,

it is this 10 th day of August , 202 2

ORDERED

, by the Court of Appeal s of Maryland, a majority of the C ourt concurring,

that the Respondent, Robert Andrew Mitchell , be suspended for 6 0 days for violation of Rule

19

- 308.4(a), (b) and (d) of the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct ; a nd it is

further

ORDERED , that, the suspension be, and hereby is, STAYED in favor of one year of

probation with the terms contained in the Probation Agreement.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International, Inc. and
subsidiaries  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Roger F.  Hruby,  Chairman  of the  Board  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the
Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 26, 2004                 /s/           Roger F. Hruby
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Roger F. Hruby
                                      Chairman of the Board and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided by CFC International,  Inc., and will be retained by CFC International,
Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Jammin Java Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2011 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Anh Tran, President, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 19, 2011
By: /s/ Anh TranAnh TranPresident, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
32.2







RAVEN
GOLD CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Raven Gold Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bashir Virji, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Raven Gold Corp. and will be
retained by Raven Gold Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
      Bashir VirjiBashir
      VirjiChief
      Financial Officer, acting Principal Financial Officer, and acting
      Principal Accounting OfficerMarch
      24, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

ATLANTIC BANCSHARES, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the Company),
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  |                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert P. Trask    
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Robert P. Trask            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michelle M. Pennell
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Michelle M. Pennell        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                         |  | Principal Financial Officer
November 4, 2014 

To: Mr. Todd Homan 

Director, Office of Aviation Analysis 

US Department of Transportation 

Re: Essential Air Service in Southeast Alaska 

Dear Mr. Homan: 

We are writing with concerns about the potential cut of essential air service 

between our capital city of Juneau and the remote villages of Tenakee Springs, 

Pelican, and Angoon. Juneau is the longstanding critical transportation hub for 

these villages, and villagers depend on air transportation to reach medical, retail 

and other services available specifically in Juneau. 

Our family lives back and forth between our home in Tenakee and our business and 

home in Juneau. We depend on Alaska Seaplanes for the daily flexibility to be in one 

community or the other, often on short notice, as business demands. A move of the 

central airline hub to Sitka would be devastating and absolutely useless to us. 

We request that you approve the proposal of Alaska Seaplanes to continue their 

service to Tenakee, Pelican and Angoon from the Juneau transportation hub, as 

stipulated in USDOT Determination 80-1-167 and the Essential Air Service program. 

Sincerely, 

Karen and Jeffrey Wilson, Tenakee and Juneau residents
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M ELV I N M U N I R, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. T H O M A S , S e r g e an t, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t, and M A R T I N E Z , C o rr e c tio n a l O f f ic e r ; e t a l., D e f

e n d an ts . N o. 09- 15727 D. C. No . 2 : 0 5 - c v - 0 1 9 9 6 - M CE EFB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl and, J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d F e bruary21, 2012 ** B e f o r e : F E RN A N D E Z , M c K E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . T hom a s , ahous i ng s e r ge anta tC a l i f orni aM e di c a l F a c i l i ty , appe a l s f r om the 

# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15727 2 di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi m qua l i f i e d i m m uni tyi n pl a i nt i f f’ M uni r ’ s 42 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g d e lib e r a te in d if f e r e n c e to s e r io u s m e d ic a l n e e d s . W e di s m i s s f orl a c k of

appe l l a t e j ur i s di c t i on. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der thi s i nt er l ocut ory app ea l because “ an order denyi ng qu al i fi ed i m m un i ty on the grou nd thata genui ne i ss ue of m at er i alfa ct exi st s i s nota f

i nal , i m m edi at el y app ea l abl e order. ” M ar opulos v . C ount

yof L os A ng eles , 560 F . 3d 974, 975 ( 9th C i r . 2009) ( pe rc ur i a m ) , c i t i ng John son v. Jones , 5 1 5 U .S . 3 0 4 , 3 1 4 - 1 5 ( 1 9 9 5 ) . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d e n ie dq u a lif ie dim m u n ityto T h o m a s a f

te rd e te rm in in g th a t th e r e w e r e g e n u in e d is p u te s o f m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w hether T ho m as w as del i bera t el y i nd i ff er entt o M un i r’ s m edi ca l needs, and that tho se fa ct s, i f proven, w ou l d est abl i sh a vi ol at i on of M un i r’ s c l earl y e st abl i shed E i ghth A m e ndm e ntr i ght s . A c c or di ngl y , w e di s m i s s thi s appe a l f orl a c k of j ur i s di c t i on. DI S MI S S E D.
1

Palma, Elizabeth

From: Palma, Elizabeth

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 9:55 AM

To: Palma, Elizabeth

Subject: Exceptional Events Proposed Rule Revisions - Conference Call with WESTAR to Discuss 

Clarifying Questions (Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0572)

Forwarding to post in docket EPA‐HQ‐OAR‐2013‐0572. Discussion on Tuesday, December 15, 2015 to respond to

WESTAR clarifying questions regarding the Exceptional Events Proposed Rule Revisions.  

Conference Call Attendees

Dan Johnson, WESTAR

Bob Lebens, WESTAR

Karen Magliano, CARB

Lev Gabrilovich, US EPA/OAQPS

Beth Palma, US EPA/OAQPS

From: Dan Johnson [mailto:djohnson@westar.org]  

Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 10:31 PM

To: Palma, Elizabeth <Palma.Elizabeth@epa.gov>; Magliano, Karen@ARB <karen.magliano@arb.ca.gov>; Bob Lebens

<blebens@westar.org>; Mary Uhl <maryuhl@westar.org>

Subject: Confirming call to discuss exceptional events

All –

I don’t recall pinning down the details of our call next Tuesday. Let’s use WESTAR conference line as follows:

DATE:  Tuesday, December 15th  

TIME:  10:30 – 11:30 PACIFIC time

CALL:   

CODE:   

Dan Johnson

Western States Air Resources Council (WESTAR)

www.westar.org
#### BERKELEY FEDERAL BANK AND TRUST, FSB *v.*FRANK F. OGALIN ET AL.

*Roy W. Moss,*in support of the petition.

*Matthew J. Forstadt,*in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendants Frank F. Ogalin and Verna T. Ogalin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 205 (AC 17206), is denied.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2228 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on camel hair, not processed 

in any manner beyond the degreased or carbonized condition. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on camel hair, 

not processed in any manner beyond the degreased or 

carbonized condition. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAMEL HAIR, NOT PROCESSED IN ANY MANNER 

4 BEYOND THE DEGREASED OR CARBONIZED 

5 CONDITION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.24 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 camel hair, not processed in any manner beyond the 

9 degreased or carbonized condition) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2228 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International,
Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 6, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0563

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

KASEY NICHOL HUGS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 5 2022

12/05/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0563
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts, National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities.

# ACTION:

Notice—meeting.

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate):

Accessibility (application review): March 20, 2012 in Room 716. This meeting, from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. EDT, will be closed.

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of February 15, 2012, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.

Any person may observe meetings, or portions thereof, of advisory panels that are open to the public, and if time allows, may be permitted to participate in the panel's discussions at the discretion of the panel chairman. If you need any accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office of Accessibility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202-682-5532, TDY-TDD 202/682-5496, at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.

Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691.

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Kathy Plowitz-Worden,

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2012-5274 Filed 3-2-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2137 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pentalyn C. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Pentalyn C. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PENTALYN C. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Gums esterfied with pentaerythritol (CAS No. 65997– 

12–8) (provided for in subheading 3806.30.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2137 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS