alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ CHARLES R. EYLER                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Charles R. Eyler Treasurer and Vice President, Finance
#### Jeffrey FLUKER v. BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF MISSISSIPPI by Karen STEWART, Managing Supervisor; and a minor female child, by and through its next friend, Vernon R. Cotten.

No. 92-CA-0127.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 9, 1993.

Arnold F. Gwin, Greenwood, for appellant.

V.R. Cotten, Carthage, for appellee.

Appeal No. AD7756 from Judgment dated Feb. 4, 1992, Denise Sweet-Owens, Ruling Judge, Hinds County Chancery Court, First Judicial District.

Before PRATHER, P.J., and BANKS and McRAE, JJ.

Affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2254 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Etoxazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Etoxazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETOXAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.31 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Etoxazole) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry & David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 8, 2009



By:

/s/ WILLIAM H. WILLIAMSWilliam H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ STEPHEN V. OCONNELLStephen V. OConnellChief Financial Officer and ChiefAdministrative Officer
#### Luther G. BOLTON and Nancy P. Bolton v. NEW ENGLAND INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 89-C-1105.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Bolton, Luther; Bolton, Nancy P.; —Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiora-ri and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA88 0282; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 314-213.

Prior report: La.App., 542 So.2d 135.

Denied.
#### Paul J. ZIEGLER, Appellant, v. CONDOR PICTURES, Inc., a Corporation, Clinton E. Miller, Trustee of Condor Pictures, Inc., Consolidated Film Industries, Inc., R. S. Rodgers, Paul E. Atkinson, and Simeon Aller as Members of Unsecured Creditors’ Committee of Condor Pictures, Inc., Appellees.

No. 9346.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 7, 1939.

Paul J. Ziegler, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Nathan Newby, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Before GARRECHT, HANEY, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Facts herein are similar to those stated in Carpenter, Babson & Fendler et al. v. Condor Pictures, Inc., 9 Cir., 108 F. 2d 318, filed this day. Upon the authority of that case, the motion to dismiss herein is

Denied.
#### Dillard L. LANE v. Robert H. HUDSPETH, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kan.

No. 2032.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 2, 1940.

Edward H. Powers, of Kansas City, Kan., for appellant.

Homer Davis, Asst.. U. S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan., for appellee.

Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed on application of appellant.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newkirk Realty Trust,  Inc.; (the Registrant)
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Michael L. Ashner,  Chief Executive
Officer of the Manager of the Registrants  General  Partner, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations  of the Registrant.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|By:   | /s/ Michael L. Ashner                      | 
|----- | ------------------------------------------ | 
|      |                                            | 
|Name: | Michael L. Ashner 
Chief Executive Officer | 

Date: August 8,
2006

47
#### George T. OUBRE v. BANK OF ST. CHARLES & TRUST COMPANY.

No. 87-C-0330.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Bank of St. Charles & Trust Co.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 86 CA 285; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 18897.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 602.

Denied.

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00182-CR

RUDOLPH GUY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1614845)

September 7, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6245

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DWAYNE GRANT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-98-336-2-18, CA-99-3534-2-18)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 5, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Grant, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Dwayne Grant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Grant, Nos. CR-98-336-2-18;

CA-99-3534-2-18 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.8


 


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


TO:     The
Directors of Rodgers Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”).


 


The undersigned hereby subscribes for [
  ]shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of the Company. In consideration for the issue of the Shares, the undersigned
hereby agrees and undertakes to pay $[  ] to the Company.


 


We agree to take the Shares subject to
the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of the Company and we authorize you to enter the following name and address in the
stockholders ledger of the Company:


 


Name:


 


		Address:	



 


 


[  ]


 


	Signed:	 	          
	Name: 
	Title:
	 
	 
	Dated:     [  ], 2020
	 
	 
	Accepted:
	 
	RODGERS SILICON VALLEY ACQUISITION CORP.
	 
	 
	Signed:	 	 
	Name:
	Title:
	 
	 
	Dated:     [  ], 2020
**Exhibit 31.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**





I,
      L.
      Michael Cutrer, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of North
      American Scientific, Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date:
      February 28, 2007




/s/ L. MICHAEL CUTRERL.
              Michael Cutrer
              *President
                and Chief Executive Officer*




19
#### ATKINS AVIATION, INC. and Earl C. Atkins, Individually, Appellants, v. The SCOTTISH LION INSURANCE COMPANY, LTD.; A.A. Mutual International Insurance Company, Ltd.; Aviation and General Insurance Company Ltd.; Road Transport and General Insurance Company Ltd.; Howard Jarrams Rose, as Personal Representative Underwriter for those underwriting members of Lloyds d/b/a Syndicates Numbered 271, 950, 40, 584, 510, 312, 598, 765, 310, 103, 780, 850, 807 and 799, Riverplate Reinsurance Company, Ltd. and American Meridian Insurance Company Ltd. (Bermuda), Appellees.

Nos. 88-134, 88-199.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 15, 1988.

Adams, Hunter, Angones, Adams, Adams & McClure and Christopher Lynch, for appellants.

McDonald & McDonald and David McDonald, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, for appellees.

*907Before HUBBART, DANIEL S. PEARSON, and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. *See Atlantic Coast IÁne E.R. v. Campbell,*104 Fla. 274, 139 So. 886 (1932) (syllabus by court, para. no. 1); *Central Nat’l Bank v. Muskat Corp.,*430 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); *Sabin v. Lowe’s of Fla., Inc.,*404 So.2d 772 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); *Security Ins. Co. v. Commercial Credit Equip. Corp.,*399 So.2d 31, 34 (Fla. 3d DCA), *rev. denied,*411 So.2d 384 (Fla. 1981); *Manufacturers’ Leasing, Ltd. v. Florida Dev. & Attractions, Inc.,*330 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-102221 and 333-123549 on Form S-3 and in RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-23237, 333-41327, 333-62157 and 333-71892 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Amendment No.2 tothe Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Radiant Systems, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

May 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                      $7,062,369
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               $5,938,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                  $186,000
<INVENTORY>                                 $4,160,782
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           $17,563,894
<PP&E>                                      $3,904,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                $513,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             $28,731,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       $4,045,366
<BONDS>                                       $119,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         $0
<COMMON>                                      $104,170
<OTHER-SE>                                 $24,462,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               $28,731,155
<SALES>                                    $18,011,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           $18,011,014
<CGS>                                      $10,878,974
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               $4,939,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              $513,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            $253,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             $1,426,921
<INCOME-TAX>                                  $592,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           $834,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  $834,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.10
        



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 4, 2012.

**A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City**                     (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:                

                    1.                     *Amos Kendall Bass III Revocable Trust, Rebecca Sue Bass Revocable Trust, and Rebecca Sue Bass,*                     as trustee, all of McAlester, Oklahoma; to acquire control of Wilburton State Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire control of Wilburton State Bank, both in Wilburton, Oklahoma.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 15, 012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6636 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### Goodrich Booth PRATT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-956.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Dec. 9, 1987.

Goodrich B. Pratt, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Joseph R. Bryant, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

THREADGILL, Judge.

Goodrich Pratt appeals a condition of his probation that he not be affiliated with the legal profession. We find the condition unrelated to either the offense or his rehabilitation and strike the condition.

The record reflects that Pratt, a member of an out-of-state bar with an application pending before the Florida Bar was adjudicated guilty of one count of grand theft. He was sentenced to ten years in prison but was to be released on probation after serving one year. One of the conditions of his probation was that he was “not to be affiliated with the legal profession.”

The supreme court has held that a condition of probation must be reasonably related to the offense committed and the rehabilitation of the offender. *Grubbs v. State,*373 So.2d 905 (Fla.1979). *See also Rodriguez v. State,*378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). We do not find that the condition of probation prohibiting this offender from “being affiliated with the legal profession” is reasonably related to the offense of grand theft or to his rehabilitation.

Further, we agree with Pratt’s argument that the condition may be unconstitutionally vague and insufficient to apprise him of which otherwise lawful acts are prohibited. *Norris v. State,*383 So.2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

We therefore strike the condition of probation.

DANAHY, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      571
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,267
<PP&E>                                         126,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,468
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,988
<BONDS>                                         81,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       142,945
<OTHER-SE>                                    (31,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                77,275
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,568
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (13,563)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,135)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.98)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2342 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2342

           To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on glyoxylic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GLYOXYLIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.04.91       Glyoxylic acid      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 298-12-                                                   31/2011.......
                          4) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2918.30.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```