alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                             AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL
                         RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.

                  AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT ACCOUNT MASTER TRUST

The  undersigned,  a duly authorized  representative  of American Express Travel
Related Services Company, Inc., as Servicer ("TRS"), pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 16, 1996, as amended by the First Amendment
to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,  dated as of March 30, 2001, (as amended
and  supplemented,  the  "Agreement"),  by and among TRS, as Servicer,  American
Express  Centurion  Bank,  a Utah  banking  institution,  and  American  Express
Receivables  Financing  Corporation II, each as Transferor,  and The Bank of New
York,  as  trustee  (the  "Trustee"),  does  hereby  certify  to the best of his
knowledge after reasonable investigation that:

1. TRS is as of the date hereof the Servicer  under the  Agreement.  Capitalized
terms used in this Certificate  have their respective  meanings set forth in the
Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly  authorized  pursuant to the Agreement to execute and
deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

3. A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  during the calendar  year ended
December 31, 2003 and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under
my supervision.

4.  Based  on such  review,  the  Servicer  has,  to the  best of my  knowledge,
performed  in  all  material   respects  its  obligations  under  the  Agreement
throughout  such  calendar  year  and no  default  in the  performance  of  such
obligations  has  occurred or is  continuing  except as set forth in paragraph 5
below.

5. The  following is a  description  of each Default in the  performance  of the
Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have
been made by the  Servicer  during the  calendar  year ended  December 31, 2003,
which sets in detail (i) the nature of each such default,  (ii) the action taken
by the  Servicer,  if any,  to remedy each such  default,  and (iii) the current
status of each such default: NONE.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 16th
day of March, 2004.

                                   AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED
                                   SERVICES COMPANY, INC., as Servicer

                                   By: /s/ Michael Bender
                                      ---------------------------------
                                      Name:  Michael Bender
                                      Title: Vice President
                                             CSBS - Forecast & Planning
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-10-00278-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE JOSEPH WAYNE EL-MUSTAFA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

1

Relator, Joseph Wayne El-Mustafa, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in

the above cause on May 10, 2010, through which he contends that Rissie Owens and the

Board of Pardons and Paroles for the State of Texas, in their official capacities, have

improperly denied relator “proper parole review due to illegal consideration of information

not contained in his file.”

This Court's mandamus jurisdiction does not extend to the Board of Pardons and

Paroles. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also In re Gilbert, No.
2

09-10-00056-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1550, at *1-2 (Tex. App.–Beaumont Mar. 4, 2010,

orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op. not designated for publication); In re

Westmoreland, No. 05-09-00944-CV, 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 6481, at *1-2 (Tex.

App.–Dallas Aug. 20, 2009, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op. not designated for

publication); In re Chilton, No. 12-08-00277-CR, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 4671, at *1-2 (Tex.

App.–Tyler June 25, 2008, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op. not designated for

publication). The issue herein is a purely post-conviction matter that does not implicate the

jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221; see also Bd. of Pardons &

Paroles ex. rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 482-83 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1995). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,

is of the opinion that we lack jurisdiction to consider this matter. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

11th day of May, 2010.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Preferred Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 31, 2005                            /s/ Bradley E. Barks
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Bradley E. Barks
                                                Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2030 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2030

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl cinnamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl cinnamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL CINNAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl cinnamate) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 05/26 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.31 N 76.47 WMeters AGL
#### Robert Mugge, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Tate, Jones & Co., a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, *En Banc.,*

June 21, 1905.)

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; Joseph B. Wall, Judge.

*J. J. Lunsford,*for Plaintiff in Error.

*C. C. Whitaker,*for Defendant in Error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. Cause dismissed on motion of counsel for the defendant in error.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2321 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2321

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous catalytic 
           preparations based on iron (III) toluenesulfonate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Kirk, and Mr. Graham) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aqueous catalytic 
           preparations based on iron (III) toluenesulfonate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AQUEOUS CATALYTIC PREPARATIONS BASED ON IRON (III) 
              TOLUENESULFONATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.38.15 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to aqueous catalytic 
preparations based on iron (III) toluenesulfonate) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 22-0261

THOMAS FRENCH,

Petitioner,

v. MONTANA TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, RAVALLI COUNTY, THE HON. JENNIFERLINT, Presiding,

Respondent. ruLL ; D) JUN 0 7 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Thomas W. French has filed a notarized Motion to Compel with this Court. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court has deemed it a petition for writ ofsupervisory control over the Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Ravalli County. M. R. App. P. 14(3). French includes a copy of the Ravalli County District Court's case register of a criminal case against him that was closed with entry ofjudgment in 2019. The case register indicates that French filed a motion in that cause number in February 2021 requesting "transcripts" and another motion nearly a year later "to Compel Request for Transcripts Communications Between Defense Attorney and Prosecuting Attorney Sentencing Documents" [sic]. French now moves this Court to compel the District Court to require the documents he seeks. The Court treats French's request as a petition for supervisory control because he seekstohavethis Court compel action bytheDistrict Court. Asthe criminal case longhas been closed, however, there is no proceeding in the District Court over which to take supervisorycontrol. This Courttwicehas deniedFrench'smotionsforout-of-time appeals. See State v. French, No. DA 20-0239, Order (Mont. May 5, 2020) and State v. French, No. DA 20-0289 (Mont. Jun. 2, 2020). 06/07/2022

Case Number: OP 22-0261

### French indicates that he requested copies ofhis complete case file from his former

counsel with the Office of State Public Defender but received only a partial case file. It appears from the case register that French is not seeking documents that would be part of theDistrict Court record from hiscriminal casebuthis formercounsel'srecordsofcontacts with the CountyAttorney's Office. Whether such records do or do not exist, French's case has long been closed and he does not have an ongoing case or available remedy through a motion to compel in that proceeding. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED French's Motion, deemed a Petition for a Writ of Supervisory Control, is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed toprovide a copy ofthis Ordertothe Honorable JenniferLint, Twenty-first Judicial District Court, Ravalli County, along with a copy of French's Petition; to Paige Trautwein, Clerk of District Court, Ravalli County, under Cause No. DC-2018-078; to counsel ofrecord; and to Thomas French personally. DATED this 1—

day ofJune, 2022.

ChiefJustice

Justices
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14805-14806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention: Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Clinical Laboratory Improvement 
Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), has been renewed for a 
2-year period through February 19, 2014.
    For information, contact May Chu, Ph.D., Designated Federal 
Officer, Clinical Laboratory Improvement

[[Page 14806]]

Advisory Committee, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop E-94, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30333, telephone 404/498-6400 or fax 404/498-6410.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-6080 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2162 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exhange resin, polystyrene crosslinked 

with divinylbenzene, chloromethylated, trimethylammonium salt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ion exhange resin, polystyrene crosslinked with divinylbenzene, 

chloromethylated, trimethylammonium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ION EXHANGE RESIN, POLYSTYRENE 

4 CROSSLINKED WITH DIVINYLBENZENE, 

5 CHLOROMETHYLATED, 

6 TRIMETHYLAMMONIUM SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2162 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ion exhange resin, polystyrene crosslinked with 

divinylbenzene, 

chloromethylated, 

trimethylammonium salt 

(CAS No. 69011–19–4) (provided for in subheading 

3914.00.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32





Certification
      of Principal Executive and Financial Officer


Pursuant
      to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”),
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
      undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigned’s
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the
      period certified.




Date:
      November 6, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Richard S. FooteRichard
                S. FootePresident
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)By:
            /s/
                R. Bradley ForthR.
                Bradley ForthExecutive
                Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand
                Secretary(Principal
                Financial Officer)





The
      foregoing certifications are being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission as part of the accompanying report on Form 10-Q. A signed original
      of
      this statement has been provided to Highbury Financial Inc. and will be retained
      by Highbury Financial Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Coleman, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J., and a jury), rendered July 6, 1989, convicting defendant of second degree assault and sentencing him to six months imprisonment and four and one-half years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The defendant’s belated objection on appeal to the trial court’s charge on justification in the use of deadly physical force by means of a deadly weapon has not been preserved for our review as a matter of law in the absence of an exception (CPL 470.05 [2]). Nor do we believe that the interest of justice requires our review of this issue. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Kassal, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 9, 2010

y0830 

# Order

September 9, 2010

141511 & (33)(34)

ANGELA RHEAUME, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141511 COA: 298524 Wayne CC: 09-031672-NF STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the July 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
From: Charles Ball [mailto:CBall@emissionsandsilencers.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 5:28 PM

To: nelson.brad@ecrweb.com

Subject: General Silencer/Converter info

Brad, here is some general info on EST oxidation silencer/converters.

"Affordable and efficient emission reduction solutions"

www.emissionsandsilencers.com

Charles Ball

Engineering Manager

cball@emissionsandsilencers.com

20322 Hufsmith-Kohrville Rd.

Tomball, TX 77375

Office: 832-559-6505

Cell: 313-920-5099
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cavalier Group
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and                                 
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: April 4, 2008

/s/ Gerald W. Williams

Gerald W. Williams Chief Executive Officer

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,693
<ALLOWANCES>                                       495
<INVENTORY>                                     27,931
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,965      
<PP&E>                                           9,969     
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,328   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,984     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,772   
<BONDS>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,038      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,984        
<SALES>                                        113,880         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,170         
<CGS>                                           78,661         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,079         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   208     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   314     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 691      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,883      
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,266     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,617     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,821
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>