alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CEDAR CITY

REGIONAL AIRPORT

12 September 2013

Dennis J. DeVany

Office of Aviation Analysis

US Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street, S.W.

Washington DC, 20590

Dear Mr. DeVany,

REGIONAL AIRPORT

2560 West Aviation Way

Cedar City, UT 84720

.,

:\1o-J';"]1J\d\-I\'Yl:).' [ill.l"d

CJnirnun

Don Marchai'll

!Lonl MC'lllhcr~

Ken Be37.er

Jyl Schulc-r

Jeff Middleton

Scott Jolly

Karl Hugh

BQ'id Hall

Oaie Brinkerhoff

r\iijlPrt :-'1":.llil);"'-

Russ Volk

U1

0,,)

Re: Essential Air Service in Cedar City, Utal'l

I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Skywest proposal that has been submitted for the

Essential Air Service Grant for the Cedar City Regional Airport.

I am pleased to support the SkyWest proposal for another two years of scheduled airline service. Since

the arrival of Regional Jet service, our passenger flow has dramatically increased. The added passenger

flow repn;sents new economic opportunities for the entire Cedar City area. A critical factor in my

decision to support the SkyWest bid is their affiliation with major airline carriers such as Delta and.

United. This affiliation is critical to our Frequent Flyer passengers.

The 2005 construction ofa new Airport-Terminal, 2012 opening of the newly constructed Airport Fire

Station and recent rehabilitation of the main runway were efforts designed to support Regional Jet

service to Cedar City. The SkyWest proposal ensures we continue our current jet service for another

two years. The current jet service has generated additional passenger flows, thus creating increased

economic development opportunities and tourism travel to visit local attractions as well as our many

regional National Monuments and Parks.

P!1u- £:;;Olk

Airport Manager

Airport Administration

435-867-9408

Airport Manager

435-691-3577

Airport Operations

435.463-7720

Airport Maintenance

435-233-0073

FAX

435.865.7051
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2093

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Perfluorobutane sulfonyl fluoride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Perfluorobutane sulfonyl fluoride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERFLUOROBUTANE SULFONYL FLUORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Perfluorobutanesul  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        fonyl fluoride                                                     31/2011.......
                        (CAS No. 375-72-
                        4) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2904.10.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT DESIGNATED

FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

RE: Docket Number 2020 -CA -1318

St. Francisville BK, L. L.C. 

Versus - - 

JEC Real Estate Investment, LLC, Delta Bank, Darryl J. 

Ellerbee, James Rex Fair, Jr., T. Taylor Townsend, and CNA

Insurance Company

On Application for

Rehearing

20th Judicial District Court

Case #: 23164

West Feliciana Parish

filed on 03/ 09/ 2022 by StarNet Insurance Company

vI?cAfa

Wayne Ray Chutz

MAR 2 2 2022
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of RazorResources Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Rong Xin Yang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Rong Xin Yang                                  

Rong Xin Yang, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 13, 2006
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40633 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CURTIS RAY RAWLS, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas (1:96-CR-120-10)

December 31, 1997

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOLLY and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Curtis Rawls appeals his sentence for possession with intent to distribute

cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He contends that the district

court incorrectly classified him as a career offender by erroneou sly adopting the1 See United States v. Calverly , 37 F.3d 160 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc); United States

v. Angulo , 927 F.2d 202 (5th Cir. 1991).

2 See United States v. Marshall , 910 F.2d 1241 (5th Cir. 1990).

3 See United States Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.1; see also 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C).

2 Presentence Investigation Report’s factual predicate that he previously had twice

been convicted of possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute. He further

maintains that the district court improperly increased his sen tence because the

gover nment had failed to notify him that his prior convictions for substance

offenses would be a relevant factor in sentencing. Finally, he contends that the

district court attr ibuted an incorrect quantity of drugs to him by erroneously

considering information he had divulged under an offer of immunity.

The district court did not err in classifying Rawls as a career offender. 1 The

government was not required to notify Rawls that his prior convictions might

increase his sentence. 2 Whether the district court incorrectly considered

incriminat ing statements Rawls made to the government is moot because Rawls

properly was classified as a career offender. 3

AFFIRMED.
From: Llenza, Charles Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 8:02:10 PM Subject: Notification of public meeting date change for the test procedure rulemaking for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers (WICF) (D ocket No. EERE-2008-BT-TP-0014, RIN 1904-AB85) Auto forwarded by a Rule
Ladies and Gentlemen:

The Department of Energy published a notice in the Federal Register on January 4, 2010, concerning a public meet ing and availability of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) regarding test procedures for walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers (WICF).

The attached notice changes the date of the pub lic meeting, the dat e of the deadline for requesting to speak at the public meeting, and the date of the deadline for submitting written comments on the framework document because the scheduled public meeting of February 11, 2010, was cancelled due to incl ement weather, which forced a Federal
Government shutdown.

The public meeting will now be held on Wedn esday, March 24, 2010, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The close of the comment period has b een changed to March 31, 2010 in order to accommodate comments received at the pu blic meeting and co mments that may be
submitted based on issues rais ed at the public meeting.

For further information please go to the following WICF web page:

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/appliance_standards /commercial/wicf_test_proc

edure_rulemaking.html

Regards,



## Charles Llenza

Project Manager/Engineer US Department of Energy (202)586-2192(work) (202)287-1590(fax) Charles.Llenza@ee.doe.gov

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

*******************************************************************************************

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FACSIMILE OR ELEC TRONIC MESSAGE IS CONFIDEN TIAL INFORMATION INTENDED
FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY NAMES ABOVE. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDEDRECIPIENT, OR AN EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS FACSIMILE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY
PROHIBITED. IF THIS MESSAGE CONT AINS NON-PUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT ANY CONSUMER OR CUSTOMER OF THE SENDER OR INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE FURTHER PROHIBITED UNDER PENALTY OF LAW FROM USING OR
DISCLOSING THE INFORMATION TO ANY THIRD PARTY BY PROVISIONS OF THE FEDERAL GRAMM-LEACH-BAILEY ACT. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS FACSIMILE OR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE IN ERROR, PLEASE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY US BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN OR DESTROY THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO ASSURE THAT IT IS NOT READ, COPIED, OR
DISTRIBUTED BY OTHERS.
#### KPW ASSOCIATES v. S.S. KRESGE COMPANY. K-MART CORPORATION v. KPW ASSOCIATES, a Limited Partnership.

No. 89-C-0010.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re KPW Associates;—Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; *1168to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 20136-CA, 20137-CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 63086, 63127.

Denied.
#### STATE ex rel. Troitdell LACKING v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-0711.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Lacking, Troitdell; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, prohibition, and mandamus; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I”, No. 288731; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-6040.

Granted. The district court is ordered to vacate and set aside the seven-year sentence imposed under La.R.S. 15:529.1 and reinstate the seven-year sentence initially imposed upon relator’s guilty plea convictions.
Exhibit 31.2

I, David W. Whitwell, certify that:

1.     I  have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Clean Diesel
Technologies,  Inc.;

2.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

a)     designed  such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

b)     evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c)     presented  in  this  annual report our conclusions about effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  date;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
functions);

a)     all  significant  deficiencies  in  the  design  or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weakness  in  internal  controls;  and

b)     any  fraud,  whether  or  not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.     The  registrants  other  certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual  report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other  factors  that  could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the  date  of  our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

Date: March 24, 2004     By: /s/ David W. Whitwell
                             ---------------------
                             David W. Whitwell
                             Chief Financial Officer, Vice Present and Treasurer


<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

y0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

141511 & (33)(34) 

ANGELA RHEAUME, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141511 

 COA: 298524 

Wayne CC: 09-031672-NF 

STATE FARM AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the July 29, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32-1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing Tax
Credits, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section1350, as adopted pursuant
to section906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the
Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER,
JR.




Wilfred
N. Cooper, Jr.


President
and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.




Date:
June 29, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000845750
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                              66,028
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    66,028
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,661,492
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                         841,127
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,661,492
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,166
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      146,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   388,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (532,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (532,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (532,879)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (70.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Travel Related Services
Company, Inc.

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), as Servicer pursuant to the American Express Credit Account Master
Trust (the Trust) Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 16, 1996, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2006, as amended by the First Amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of December 17,
2007, as amended by the Second Amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 24, 2008, as amended by the Third Amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February 24, 2009, and as amended by the
Fourth Amendment to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 7, 2010 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the Agreement), among American Express Receivables Financing
Corporation II, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC, as transferors, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer), and The Bank of New York Mellon
(formerly The Bank of New York), as trustee and securities intermediary (the Trustee), does hereby certify that:

1. TRS is
Servicer under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
Certificate.

3. A review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been
made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate
this 20th day of March, 2013.



|                                                       |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
|                                                       | 
|By:                                                    |  | /s/ Kunal B. Singhania
|Name:                                                  |  | Kunal B. Singhania    
|Title:                                                 |  | Vice President
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(a)






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of CheckFree Corporation and
Subsidiaries:


We have audited the consolidated financial statements of CheckFree Corporation
and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and 2002, and for the years ended June 30,
2000, 2001 and 2002, and have issued our report thereon dated August 8, 2002;
such consolidated financial statements and report are included in your 2002
Annual Report to Stockholders and are incorporated herein by reference. Our
audits also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of CheckFree
Corporation and subsidiaries, listed in Item 14. This consolidated financial
statement schedule is the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion,
such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 8, 2002
<PAGE>

                     CHECKFREE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, 2001 AND 2002





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        BALANCE AS      AMOUNT     CHARGES TO
                                            OF        ASSUMED IN    TO COSTS      CHARGES TO
                                        BEGINNING      BUSINESS       AND           OTHER                      BALANCE AS OF
                                        OF PERIOD    COMBINATION    EXPENSES      DEDUCTIONS     DEDUCTIONS    END OF PERIOD
                                       -----------   -----------   ----------     ----------     ----------   ---------------
<S>                                      <C>             <C>         <C>              <C>          <C>              <C>
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
      2000.............................   4,430           268         2,615             -           3,310            4,003
      2001.............................   4,003             -            50             -           1,090            2,963
      2002.............................   2,963             -           689             -           1,652            2,000
Reserve for Returns and Chargebacks
      2000.............................   1,664             -         4,212             -           3,471            2,405
      2001.............................   2,405             -         3,847             -           1,589            4,663
      2002.............................   4,663             -          (514)            -           2,443            1,706

</TABLE>