alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SOUTHERN GROCERY STORES, Inc., v. CHILDS.

No. 8933.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 28, 1939.

M. E. Kilpatrick, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.

James A. Branch and Thomas B. Branch, Jr., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before FOSTER, HUTCHESON, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

FOSTER, Circuit Judge.

Appellee, as trustee in bankruptcy of Paramount Dairy Company, brought this suit under the provisions of Section 60 National Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 96, to recover preferential payments made to appellant by the bankrupt. It was tried to a jury and a verdict was rendered in appellee’s favor, upon which judgment was entered. Errors are assigned to the overruling of a plea of res adjudicata and to the denial of a directed verdict.

The plea of res adjudicata is based upon a judgment of the Superior Court of De Kalb County, Georgia, dismissing on demurrer a suit brought by appellee against Southern Grocery Stores, Inc. (appellant), Southern Dairy Corporation, and four individuals, charging them, in effect, with fraudulent conversion of the assets of the bankrupt. That suit was brought under the law of Georgia and sounded in tort. Recovery of preferences was not an issue in that suit and the question was not decided. The suit at bar is based upon a right given the trustee by a Federal statute. Fraud is not an ingredient. While the parties are the same, it is evident the cause of action is different. The plea of res adjudicata was properly overruled. Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R. Co., 227 U.S. 434, 33 S.Ct. 274, 57 L.Ed. 586.

The motion for a directed verdict was on the ground that there was no proof showing the bankrupt was insolvent at the times the preferences were received. It is further contended it was not shown appellant had reasonable cause to know the bankrupt was insolvent or that it was being granted preferences. The amount of the verdict is not disputed. On this point it is sufficient to say we find substantial evidence in the record tending to support the verdict.

No prejudicial error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2232 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2232

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Insulated           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          hydration systems                                                  31/2011.......
                          with an outer
                          surface of
                          textile materials
                          whose interior
                          incorporates a
                          flexible plastic
                          container of a
                          kind for storing
                          and dispensing
                          potable beverages
                          through attached
                          flexible tubing
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.92.04 or
                          4202.92.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kenneth SCOTT.

No. 86-KK-2382.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Scott, Kenneth; applying for supervisory writs and writs of certiorari, habeas corpus and review; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, No. 254-675; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. K-6645.

Denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY>  US 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,270,000
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    103,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,595,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,677,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,486,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,066,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,677,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,812,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,489,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,489,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Sarah H. Barnes et al., Respondents, *v.*The Midland Railroad Terminal Company, Appellant.

Reported below, 147 App. Div. 89.

(Submitted February 21, 1916;

decided February 29, 1916.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 28, 1911, affirming an interlocutory judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the notice of appeal was not served within the'time required bylaw, and that the Court of Appeals had, in any event, no jurisdiction to review the judgment appealed from.

*660
      *John Brooks Leavitt*for motion.

*Alfred G. Reeves*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
EXHIBIT
23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-113776, 333-99755, 333-91138, 333-68586, 333-68096,
333-60676, 333-51642, 333-89701, 333-66913, 333-44877, 333-43905, 333-36527,
333-26869, 333-24753, 333-2600) of Verity, Inc. of our report dated June 13,
2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

| | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
| | ------------------------------

San
Jose, California
August 12, 2004

100

---

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15368-15369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9647-5]


2012 Annual Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency is 
announcing the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission 
(OTC). This OTC meeting will explore options available for reducing 
ground-level ozone precursors in a multi-pollutant context. The 
Commission will be evaluating potential measures and considering 
actions in areas such as performance standards for electric generating 
units (EGUs) on high electric demand days, oil and gas boilers serving 
EGUs, small natural gas boilers, stationary generators, energy 
security/energy efficiency, architectural industrial and maintenance 
coatings, consumer products, institution commercial and industrial 
(ICI) boilers, vapor recovery at gas stations, large above ground 
storage tanks, seaports, aftermarket catalysts, lightering, and non-
road idling.

DATES: The meeting will be held on May 24, 2012 starting at 9 a.m. and 
ending at 4 p.m.

LOCATION: Sheraton Suites Old Town Alexandria, 801 North Saint Asaph 
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314; (703) 836-4700.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For documents and press inquiries 
contact: Ozone Transport Commission, 444 North Capitol Street NW., 
Suite 638, Washington, DC 20001; (202) 508-3840; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f302530313a1f302b3c3e362d71302d38"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92fde8fdfcf7d2fde6f1f3fbe0bcfde0f5">[email protected]</span></a>; Web site: http://www.otcair.org.

[[Page 15369]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain 
at Section 184 provisions for the Control of Interstate Ozone Air 
Pollution. Section 184(a) establishes an Ozone Transport Region (OTR) 
comprised of the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, 
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode 
Island, Vermont, parts of Virginia and the District of Columbia. The 
purpose of the OTC is to deal with ground-level ozone formation, 
transport, and control within the OTR.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Agenda: Copies of the final agenda will be available from the OTC 
office (202) 508-3840; by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cca3b6a3a2a98ca3b8afada5bee2a3beab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a554055545f7a554e595b53481455485d">[email protected]</span></a> or via the OTC Web 
site at http://www.otcair.org.

    Dated: March 1, 2012.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2012-6280 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPUTER
MANAGEMENT SCIENCES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                14,191,603
<SECURITIES>                                           4,895,482
<RECEIVABLES>                                          7,823,553
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      28,988,045
<PP&E>                                                 8,824,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                         1,481,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        46,329,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  2,770,502
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                 124,130
<OTHER-SE>                                            43,218,673
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          46,329,614
<SALES>                                               46,095,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      46,095,306
<CGS>                                                 28,450,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         28,450,872
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         4,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       10,310,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                           3,976,793
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    6,333,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                           6,333,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.44


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2213

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain food choppers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Dodd (for himself and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain food choppers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN FOOD CHOPPERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Food choppers each  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        with a reversible                                                  31/2011.......
                        motor and a dual
                        function blade,
                        for grinding or
                        chopping, with a
                        bowl capacity of
                        0.6 liters or
                        more, but not
                        more than 1 liter
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8509.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HON. UTA INDZEL COHEN 

(RETIRED) MEMBER 

309 MEADOW LANE 

MERION. PA 19066 

Honorable Ray LaHood 

secretary of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 200590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

HARRISBURG 

S I 0-1 OOClI ()-023 

PHONE: (610) 667-7795 

E-MAIL; iitacohenfWcomcast.r.et 

Because my ten year old grandson has a severe peanut allergy and travels often by air with his parents, I 

felt it necessary to contact you concerning the proposed air travel rules. 

I have founded the Food Allergy Research Initiative (FARI), an unique project designed to study the 

immune system and identify and target key cells of that immune system by using immune modulation to 

alter the response of these cells. 

There are many facets involved with these allergies. Obviously, seriously sensitive children and adults 

run the risk of instant death upon exposure to the irritating sources. Needless to say, airplane travel is 

difficult and hazardous for these individuals. 

I would be more than happy to testify and/or present information concerning these allergies and 

airplane travel. I am in touch with numerous people touched in some way by this issue, and I believe 

that I could be of assistance to you in your endeavor. 

Respectful/y,
Exhibit 32 (a)

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned, Terry W. Shaver, Chief Executive Officer of Abatix Corp. (the “Company”) has executed this certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”).  

The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|   | /s/ TERRY W. SHAVER                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                       |
|   | Terry W. Shaver                       |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | March 24, 2005                        |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

WILLIAM ARMSTEAD AND TULLY J. 

SPEAKER AND BARBARA 

KRASSENSTEIN AND GAIL OBER AND 

ANNYAH HASLER AND ROGER 

HASLER AND BERNARD BONDI AND 

ROSEANNE STAGNO ADAMS AND 

JOVIDA HILL AND SCENIC 

PHILADELPHIA, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF 

THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA AND CITY 

OF PHILADELPHIA AND FRANKLIN 

INSTITUTE, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 261 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
EXHIBIT
32.2





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Alex Gong , Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/  Alex
      GongName:    Alex
      GongTitle:     
      Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6273]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[OMB Control No. 3090-0235; Docket 2011-0001; Sequence 10]


General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; 
Information Collection; Price Reductions Clause; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy; General Services Administration 
(GSA)

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document extends the comment closing date of the notice 
of request for comments regarding OMB Control No. 3090-0235, Price 
Reductions Clause, published in the Federal Register at 76 FR 81941, on 
December 29, 2011.

DATES: Submit comments on or before April 16, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by Information Collection 3090-
0235, Price Reductions Clause, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Regulations.gov: http://www.regulations.gov. Submit 
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by inputting ``Information 
Collection 3090-0235, Price Reductions Clause,'' under the heading 
``Enter Keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.'' Select the link 
``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``Information Collection 
3090-0235, Price Reductions Clause.'' Follow the instructions provided 
at the ``Submit a Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company 
name (if any), and ``Information Collection 3090-0235, Price Reductions 
Clause'' on your attached document.
    <bullet> Fax: 202-501-4067.
    <bullet> Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory 
Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20417. ATTN: 
Hada Flowers/IC 3090-0235, Price Reductions Clause.
    Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite Information 
Collection 3090-0235, Price Reductions Clause, in all correspondence 
related to this collection. All comments received will be posted 
without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
and/or business confidential information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Dana Munson, Procurement Analyst, 
at (202) 357-9652. Please cite OMB Control No. 3090-0235, Price 
Reductions Clause.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Purpose

    The clause at GSAR 552.238-75, Price Reductions, used in multiple 
award schedule contracts ensures that the Government maintains its 
relationship with the contractor's customer or category of customers, 
upon which the contract is predicated. The reason for the burden 
decrease as it exists now is based on current data updating the number 
of MAS Schedule contractors.

    Dated: March 8, 2012.
Mindy S. Connolly,
Chief Acquisition Officer, U.S. General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-6273 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P