alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fixed Wing sUAS Check List

FWChameleon, Ultra Stick 120 and 25e

Revision date: 9/1/15
Preflight

 Aircraft check

 Bolts

 Motor bolts

 Props hand tight

 Video wires

 Video transmitter

 Video antenna

 Data radio antenna

 Camera wires

 Lipo battery

(Check voltage over 12V)

 Aircraft transmitter set

 Mode switch manual

 Throttle idle

 Switches off

 Ch 7 Off

 Camera transmitter set 

 Camera tilt down

Site preflight Inspection

 Locate landing and take off points

 Locate forced landing points

 Define path of inspection flight

 Define hold points

 Define when pilot and VO will walk 

to provide a better vantage point

 Pilot and VO are required to be in 

agreement with the procedure and 

path of flight

48-72 hrs NOTAM in place

24 hrs Charging and Testing

 Flight test aircraft and video system

 Operate in all modes and RTL

 Charge Lipo batteries

 Charge video monitor

 Charge camera

 Turn on transmitters and replace 

batteries if below 9.8 V stable

SUAS Procedures
Start up and flight

 Aircraft transmitter on 

 (Voltage over 9.8V stable)

 Camera transmitter on

 (Voltage over 9.8V stable)

 Camera on

 Connect Lipo battery

 Place aircraft on flat surface

 Video monitor on 

 (Video signal received)

 Aircraft self diagnostic (yellow light)

 Aircraft transmitter telemetry on

 (Signal strength good)

 (Aircraft battery over 12V)

 (Satellites acquiring)

 Aircraft transmitter 

 Mode switch manual Green light

 Mode switch Semi-Auto Green light

 Mode switch Auto Green or blue light

 Aircraft transmitter set to manual

 Aircraft safety switch activated (aircraft armed)

 Transmitter arm (Throttle lower right)

 Fly aircraft P, R, ALT control check in manual

 At 75 + ftLTR P, R, ALT control check back to manual

 Auto mode, fly aircraft to hold point and check drift

 Fly aircraft ready to switch in ALT or Manual modes

 (Warning GPS loss happens suddenly) 

 (causing a fly away aircraft)

 Monitor voltage and signal strength

 Land aircraft at >10.8 volts 

Landing 

 Fly aircraft to hold point and check 

landing area

 20+ ft switch to Semi-Auto or 

manual

 Land aircraft 

 Hold throttle at idle for 20 seconds

 Slow move throttle to lower left to 

disarm 

 Prop stop spinning select safety 

switch on aircraft

 Disconnect Lipo battery

 Camera off

 Transmitters off, Video 

screen/receiver off

 Remove propellers and store
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 20423 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Christopher Jamal Alridge,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 681

- 1

Before **Jolly, Willett,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * Christopher Jamal Alridge appeals the 70

- month, within

- guidelines range sentence imposed upon his guilty plea to possession of a firearm as a felon. On appeal, h e challenges the application of the sentence enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B).

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 28, 2021 Lyle W. C ayce Clerk Case: 20-20423 Document: 00515955542 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/28/2021No. 20

- 20423

2 Th e district court did not clearly err by applying the enhancement, which adds four levels if a defendant “used or possessed any firearm or ammunition in connection with another felony. ” § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) ; see United States v. Coleman , 609 F.3d 699, 708 (5th Cir. 2010)

. Alridge’s assertion that “he scooped up the pistol” and that the fight ended moments later is consistent with the finding in the presentence report that Alridge took the firearm during the assault. Thus, a finding that Alridge assaulted the complainant “in the course of committing theft” is plausible in light of the record as a whole See Sorrells v. State , 343 S.W.3d 152, 155

- 56 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); **Tex. Penal Code** § 29.01(1). Additionally, we have held that Guideline § 2K2.1 does not e xpressly prohibit the application of both § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) because a firearm was stolen and § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) for using or possessing a firearm in connection with another felony offense and that the enhancements do not double count , impermissibly or otherwi se, the same conduct

. See United States v. Luna , 165 F.3d 316, 323

- 24 (5th Cir. 1999); accord United States v. Jimenez

- Elvirez , 862 F.3d 527, 541 (5th Cir. 2017). A panel of this court may not overrule the decision of another panel absent an en banc or superseding Supreme Court decision. United States v. Lipscomb , 299 F.3d 303, 313 & n.34 (5th Cir. 2002); see also Wicker v. McCotte r, 798 F.2d 155, 157

- 58 (5th Cir. 1 986)

. Furthermore , we continue to reject the assertion that a firearm did not facilitate another felony offense when there was no separation of time or conduct between the theft of the firearm and the illegal possession of the firearm. See United States v. Perez , 585 F.3d 880, 886

- 87 (5th Cir. 2009)

. Alridge’s possession of the stolen firearm had the potential to facilitate the ongoing robbery. See § 2K2.1, comment. (n.14). The district court’s judgment is **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 20-20423 Document: 00515955542 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/28/2021
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Nevada Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the Nevada 
Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene on 
Friday, March 30, 2012, at 1 p.m. and adjourn at approximately 3:30 
p.m. at the Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation, 2800 
East St. Louis Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada 89104. The purpose of the 
meeting is for the Committee to receive an orientation and plan future 
activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the Western Regional Office by April 30, 
2012. The mailing address is Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission 
on Civil Rights, 300 N. Los Angeles St., Suite 2010, Los Angeles, CA 
90032. Persons wishing to email their comments may do so to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fa9b8e889f8c939495ba8f89999988d49d958c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5a4b1b7a0b3acabaa85b0b6a6a6b7eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons that desire additional information should 
contact Angelica Trevino, Office Manager, Western Regional Office, at 
(213) 894-3437.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Western Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Western Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, March 12, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2012-6360 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*JASON SHINN

*Francis T. Mandanici,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 401 (AC 15928), is denied.

*914
      *Robert J. Scheinblum,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 25, 1998
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Wayne DAVIS.

No. 87-K-0333.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 23, 1987.

In re Davis, Wayne; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR-86-763; Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 213568.

Prior report: La.App., 499 So.2d 729.

Granted. Sentence vacated. Remanded for resentencing with compliance with C.Cr.P. art. 894.1.

MARCUS, LEMMON and COLE, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1



|               |  |                                                                                                                       
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.1  |  | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 of Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                  |  | 
|----------------- |  | 
|Date: May 6, 2011

By:       /s/ ROBERT H. WALLS,
JR.

Name:  Robert H.
Walls, Jr.

Title:    Office of the Chief Executive Officer (performing the functions of principal executive officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2441 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2441

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain windsock type decoys.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Brownback introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain windsock type decoys.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN WINDSOCK TYPE DECOYS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Windsock type       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          decoys with                                                        31/2011.......
                          silhouette heads,
                          internal framed
                          body to maintain
                          shape in low
                          winds, and spring
                          steel stake
                          system for wind
                          induced movement
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9507.90.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                         
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/    STEVEN A.
ABNEY                                                                                                                                  
|                      |  | Steven A. Abney Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings,
      Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Gui Hua LanName:
                Gui Hua LanTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board/s/
                Wendy FuName:
                Wendy FuTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer





November
      14, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China
      Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2320 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2320

To reduce temporarily the duty on parts of machinery for the industrial 
preparation or manufacture of dried vegetable snack (small portions of 
          food usually eaten other than at meal times) items.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Nelson of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on parts of machinery for the industrial 
preparation or manufacture of dried vegetable snack (small portions of 
          food usually eaten other than at meal times) items.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARTS OF MACHINERY FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PREPARATION OR 
              MANUFACTURE OF DRIED VEGETABLE SNACK (SMALL PORTIONS OF 
              FOOD USUALLY EATEN OTHER THAN AT MEAL TIMES) ITEMS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Parts of machinery  0.8%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for the                                                            31/2011.......
                        industrial
                        preparation or
                        manufacture of
                        dried vegetable
                        snack (small
                        portions of food
                        usually eaten
                        other than at
                        meal times) items
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8438.90.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Byron TAYLOR.

No. 86-KO-2288.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

Reconsideration Denied Feb. 20, 1987.

In re Taylor, Byron; applying for remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR 86-227; Parish of Lafayette, *8515th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 86CR-50961.

Prior report: La.App., 495 So.2d 996.

Denied.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Anthony CELIUS.

No. 88-KH-1793.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 13, 1988.

In re Celius, Anthony; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 320-557.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, for prompt consideration.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0

                    INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following is a list of all subsidiaries and partnership interests of
Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. and the state or other jurisdiction of
organization or incorporation:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               JURISDICTION OF ORGANIATION
NAME OF ENTITY                                       OR INCORPORATION
<S>                                            <C>
Corporations
Income Opportunity La Mesa Corporation                  Nevada
Income Opportunity Yeager Corp.                         Nevada
IORI Akard Corporation                                  Nevada
IORI Enclave 5, Inc.                                    Nevada
La Mesa Village Plaza Commercial Association          California
Transcontinental Brewery, Inc.                          Nevada
Transcontinental Parkway Corporation                    Nevada
Transcontinental Treehouse Corporation                  Nevada

Partnerships
Nakash Income Associates                               Georgia
TCI Eaton Square LP                                     Texas
</TABLE>


                                       81
#### Joseph J. JOZWIAK, Petitioner, v. Robert LEONARD, as Sheriff of Suwannee County, and Suwannee County, Florida, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, Respondents.

No. 69745.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Oct. 8, 1987.

Michael H. Lambert of Tanner and Lambert, Daytona Beach, for petitioner.

Julius F. Parker, Jr. of Parker, Skelding, Costigan, McVoy & Labasky, Tallahassee, for respondents.

SHAW, Justice.

We review *Jozwiak v. Leonard,*504 So.2d 1260, 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), to *667answer a certified question of great public importance.

> DOES THE SUPREME COURT’S HOLDING, IN *AVALLONE V. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CITRUS COUNTY,*493 So.2d 1002 (Fla.1986), ... THAT THE PURCHASE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 286.28 CONSTITUTES A WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY UP TO THE LIMITS OF INSURANCE COVERAGE NEGATE THE NECESSITY OF THE PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THE NOTICE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 768.28(6) FOUND BY THIS COURT IN *BURKETT V. CALHOUN COUNTY,*441 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)?

*Id.*We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We approve the decision below and answer the question in the negative.

The issue is “whether the notice requirements of section 768.28(6) must be met where insurance has been procured pursuant to section 30.55 or section 286.28.” 504 So.2d at 1262. The district court below canvassed the case law and concluded that notice was required. Petitioner argues that there is no notice requirement contained in section 30.55 and that therefore the notice requirement in section 768.28(6) should not be given effect. This argument is meritless. There is no contradiction between the two statutes nor is there any reason why both statutes cannot be given effect. Satisfaction of the notice requirement is a condition precedent to suit against the government. *Levine v. Dade County School Board,*442 So.2d 210, 213 (Fla.1983). *Accord Burkett v. Calhoun County,*441 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983). *Cf. Ingraham v. Dade County School Board,*450 So.2d 847 (Fla.1984) (the twenty-five percent limitation on attorney fees in section 768.28 applies regardless of whether liability insurance is purchased). *Avallone,*on which petitioner relies, is off point and not to the contrary. There we addressed the issue of whether a government unit which had purchased liability insurance could also claim sovereign immunity. We held that it could not because to do so would have been directly contrary to section 286.28. We note, but do not rely on, the recent enactment of chapter 87-134, section 4, Laws of Florida, repealing sections 30.55 and 286.28.

We answer the certified question in the negative and approve the decision below.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Zandaria  Ventures  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August 14, 2007


/s/ Jason Smart
------------------------------------------
Jason Smart, Principal Financial Officer



-------------------
A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to ExperTelligence,  Inc. and will be retained by ExperTelligence, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.