alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1918 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s non-work footwear covering 

the ankle. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men’s non-work 

footwear covering the ankle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN’S NON-WORK FOOTWEAR COV4 ERING THE ANKLE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1918 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Footwear with outer soles 

and uppers of rubber or plastics, covering the ankle, other 

than work footwear, the foregoing for men (provided for 

in subheading 6402.91.40) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2238 

To suspend temporarily the duty on S-Abscisic Acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on S-Abscisic Acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. S-ABSCISIC ACID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 [S-(Z,E)]-5-(1-Hydroxy2,6,6-trimethyl-4-oxo-2-cyclohexen-1-yl)-3-methyl-2,4- 

pentanedienoic acid (CAS No. 

14375–45–2) (provided for in 

subheading 2916.20.5000) .... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2238 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsCommentaries     Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians
        
            Commentaries
 Keyword
 Type Select a CategoryTop StoriesMission/TrainingFeaturesSecretary of the AFAF Chief of StaffChief Master Sgt. of the AFCommentariesSequestration NewsSpace/TechnologyHumanitarianAFSO 21Women's History Month 1-15EnvironmentalWarrior CareDiversityDignified TransferSafetyHeritageAir Force FamilyPersonnel MattersCommander's Call TopicsHaiti Earthquake ReliefDon't Ask Don't TellSuicide PreventionWarrior GamesEnergyAircraftEtchbergerSexual AssaultOperation TomodachiOperation Odyssey Dawn2011 Appropriations InformationHurricane Irene9/11AFAWeek in PhotosThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their Words2012 Appropriations InformationAfrican American History MonthAfrican American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29Fiscal Year BudgetAir Force StoriesColorado WildfireChief of Staff ArchiveHurricane IsaacAFA 2012APP RSSAPP Airman VisualsExpeditionary OperationsHurricane SandyTransition GPSAir Force in SpaceSports/RecreationH1N1Women's History Month 16-30Oklahoma Tornado ReliefMemorial DayCOVID-19 CommentariesCOVID-19
 RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 July 18, 2017'All in' Investing in tomorrow—Air Force Junior ROTC
        General of the Air Force Henry H. Arnold said, “We must think in terms of tomorrow.” At Air University we do just that; tomorrow is our focus today.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Asia Automotive Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge,
that:

     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
(the "Form 10-QSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material aspects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 22, 2008


/s/ Rudy Wilson
Rudy Wilson
Chief Executive Officer


/s/ David J. Brophy
David J. Brophy
Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Abatix Corp.:

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in registration statement No. 333-95187 on Form S-3
of Abatix Corp. of our report dated March 1, 2002 relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Abatix Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000, and the related statements of operations, stockholders equity and
cash flows and the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in
the three year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Abatix Corp.

Dallas, Texas



March 20, 2002
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
# ATLANTIC BANCSHARES,
INC.

Exhibit 32

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
               with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
               Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  August 11, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                       |  | Robert P. Trask           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer   

|Date:  August 11, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Michelle M. Pennell
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|                       |  | Michelle M. Pennell           
|                       |  | Principal Financial Officer
***CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED***

***PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                    |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/                Gui Hua Lan                                     |   |   |   |
| Name:              Gui Hua Lan                                          |   |   |        |
| Title:                Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |   |   |   |

|                                             |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Qiong                Hua Gao       |   |   |   |
| Name: Qiong              Hua Gao            |   |   |        |
| Title: Chief              Financial Officer |   |   |   |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2017

a1023 

# Order

Clerk October 31, 2017

154306

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154306

COA: 333078

Chippewa CC: 15

- 001815

- FH

CHRISTINE MARIE KUCHARCZYK,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of January 31, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the June 30,

2016 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in People

v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946

- 8). On

order of the Court, the cases having been decided on July 24, 2017, 500 Mich 453 (2017),

the application is again considered, and it is DENIED , because we are not persuaded that

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM JUNE 1, 1996 TO JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      20,987,355
<SECURITIES>                                18,089,029
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,796,270
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,279,722
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            90,798,732
<PP&E>                                      46,388,560
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,821,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             196,229,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,303,019
<BONDS>                                      8,274,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       422,748
<OTHER-SE>                                 137,251,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               196,229,544
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,039,862
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               50,528,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           122,357,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324,726
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (146,831,450)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (8,628,615)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (138,202,835)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (364,374)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                             (138,567,209)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.70)
        

</TABLE>
#### HORNBLOWER & WEEKS, INC. Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant, Jon Cedar, Russell Development Association, Michael Ostro and Hart Rotenberg, Plaintiffs, v. BLUE MARLIN BREWERIES, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and Dennis L. Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 10, 2003.

Thomas F. Pepe, Pepe *&*Nemire, P.A., Coral Gables, FL, (Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant Hornblower & Weeks did not appear or submit a brief), for Appellants.

Present: Hon. RALPH K. WINTER, Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and Hon. RICHARD W. GOLDBERG,* Judge.

*

 The Honorable Richard W. Goldberg, of the United States Court for International Trade, sitting by designation.

*834SUMMARY ORDER

THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA.

At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the United States Courthouse, Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 10th day of June, two thousand three.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Appellants Blue Marlin Breweries, Inc., and Dennis L. Valdez appeal an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kevin Fox, *M.J.)*denying defendants’ motion for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. We have considered appellants’ arguments, and find no error in the district court’s decision.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### ***********************************************The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it wasreleased as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods fo r filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion.

All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appella te Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the advance release version of an opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports , the latest version is to
be considered authoritative.

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official repo rts are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, Stat e of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
***********************************************STATE v . JONES—CONCURRENCE

PALMER, J., concurring. I fully agree with the majority opinion. I write separately only to note my belief that, for the reasons previously expressed in State v. Diaz , 302 Conn. 93, 115, 25 A.3d 594 (2011) ( Palmer

, J. , concurring), a special credibility instruction shouldbe given whenever a government informer seeks a benefit from the state in return for his or her testimony. See id., 121–22 (

Palmer

, J. , concurring) (‘‘Because informers seeking a benefit from the state have a strong motive to falsely inculpate the accused . . . I agree with those courts that require a special credibility instruction whenever a government informer hopes or expects to receive a benefit from the prosecution. As the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has stated, ‘a defendant who makes [a request for a special credibility instruction] is entitled to a charge that identifies the circumstances that may make one or another of the government’s witnesses particularly vulnerable to the prosecution’s power and influence . . . and that specifies the ways (by catalog or example) that a person so situated mightbe particularly advantaged by promoting the prosecution’s case.’ United States v. Prawl , 168 F.3d 622, 628 (2d Cir. 1999). In other words, the defendant is entitledto a charge that ‘invite[s] focus on individual predicaments of the witnesses’ and contains ‘mention [of] the

incentives that follow from certain transactions with the government.’ Id., 628–29 . . . .’’ (Citations omitted; footnote omitted.)). The defendant in the present case, Billy Ray Jones, however, has made no such claim, and, consequently, the majority has no reason to address it. Because, in my view, the majority correctly analyzes and resolves the claim that the defendant has raised, I join the majority opinion.
#### STATE ex rel. Calvin BROWN v. Warden Frank BLACKBURN, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 86-KH-2463.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Brown, Calvin; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, writ of habeas corpus and mandamus; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 121514; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18741-KH.

Denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Thursday, March 15, 2012.

# PLACE:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Final Rule—Parts 701, 760 and 790 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, Technical Amendments.

2. NCUA's Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan.

3. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.

# RECESS:

10:45 a.m.

# TIME AND DATE: 

11 a.m., Thursday, March 15, 2012.

# PLACE:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Creditor Claim Appeal. Closed pursuant to exemptions (6) and (8).

2. Consideration of Supervisory Activities. Closed pursuant to exemptions (8), (9)(i)(B) and 9(ii).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Board Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-6005 Filed 3-8-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

|Name of Subsidiary                                          |  | Place of Incorporation
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                                            |  |                       
|PECO II Global Services, Inc.                               |  | Delaware              
|                                                            |  |                       
|Apex Telecommunications Manufacturing, Inc.                 |  | New Hampshire         
|                                                            |  |                       
|PECO Telecommunications LLC(1)                              |  | Delaware              
|                                                            |  |                       
|PECO Powering LLC(2)                                        |  | Delaware              
|                                                            |  |                       
|                                                            |  |                       
|Telecom Global Services de Mexico                           |  | Mexico                
|                                                            |  |                       
|(1) General Partner in PECO II Texas, LP with 1% interest. 
|                                                            |  |                       
|(2) Limited Partner in PECO II Texas, LP with 99% interest.
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donnie CREAMER.

No. 88-KH-1322.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 19, 1988.

In re Donnie Creamer; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Ouachita, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 42322; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19915-KW.

Granted. The sentence imposed is amended to provide “fine or default” provision may be enforced only if defendant is not indigent.