alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23


 


Chongqing Puluosi Microfinance Co. Ltd.


Loan Contract


 


(Contract No. :  [●])


 


Loaner: Chongqing Puluosi
Microfinance Co. Ltd.


Address: 19 Yinglong Avenue, Longxin Town,
Yubei District, Chongqing City.


 


Borrower: Chongqing Penglin
Food Co. Ltd.


Address: 128 Xinyuan Road, Zhenxi Town,
Beiling District, Chongqing City.


 


	 	I.	Loan:


 


	 	1.	Type: Liquid capital loan


 


	 	2.	Purpose: purchase raw materials


 


	 	3.	Currency: RMB.


 


	 	4.	Amount: ¥10,000,000


 


	 	5.	Term: short term


 


	 	6.	Period: 12 months from the date of withdrawal


 


	 	II.	Loan interest rate, interest calculation and interest settlement:


 


	 	1.	Loan interest rate is calculated pursuant to


 


	Fixed rate: Loan interest rate is fixed at an annual rate of 12%.


 


	 	2.	Loan Interest Rate shall be settled monthly on the 20th day of each month. The corresponding day of actual withdrawal date of each month is the interest payment date.


 


	 	3.	If Borrower does not repay the loan on time, Borrower is deemed to be at default, and is subject to penalty interest, liquidated damages, and compound interest. Penalty interest is the loan interest plus 50bp.


 


	 	4.	If the loan is used in violation of the purpose of this agreement, the penalty interest will be increased 50bp of the loan interest under this contract.


 


	 	III.	Guarantee:


 


	 	1.	The guarantee type for performance of this contract is guarantee and pledge.


 


	Name of Guarantor and Pledge	 	Contract No.	 	Guarantee Type
	Mingwen Wang	 	 	 	 Guarantee
	Zeshu Dai	 	 	 	 Guarantee
	Guangan Yongpeng Food Co. Ltd.	 	 	 	 Pledge


 


	 	IV.	Repayment of Loan Principal


 


	 	1.	Borrower shall repay the interest monthly and the principal on the maturity date.


 


	 	2.	Borrower shall pay as liquidated damage the penalty interest as described above.


 






    


     


    

 


	 	VII.	Miscellaneous:


 


	 	1.	Any disputes arising from the performance of the contract shall be submitted to the court located in the place where Loaner resides.


 


	 	2.	This contract comes into effect upon execution by legal representative of each party and stamped by both parties.


 


Loaner: /s/Chongqing Puluosi
Microfinance Co. Ltd.


 


Borrower: /s/Chongqing Penglin
Food Co. Ltd.


 


Execution date: November 13,
2017
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Richard
              A. RappaportRichard
              A. RappaportPrincipal
                Executive OfficerMay
                14, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with this Quarterly  Report of Utilicraft  Aerospace  Industries,
Inc.  (the  "Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2008 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Randy Moseley,  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss..1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss..906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.

Date: August 13, 2008

By: /s/ Randy Moseley
    -----------------
 Randy Moseley,
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ZD Ventures Corp a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2016 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*/s/ Terence Robinson*

Terence Robinson

Chief Executive and Financial  Officer

(Principal executive and financial officer)

 

Date: June 12, 2017
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2301 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn U3000. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Boltorn U3000. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BOLTORN U3000. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2301 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Propanoic acid, 3-hydroxy-2- 

(hydroxymethyl)-2-methyl-, 

homopolymer, ester with αhydro-ω-hydroxypoly(oxy-1,2- 

ethanediyl) ether with 2,2- 

bis(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol (4:4:1), 2,2- 

bis[(2- 

propenyloxy)methyl]butyl 

succinates C3-24 carboxylates 

(CAS 462113–23–1) (provided for in subheading 

3907.50.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2006298EN.01001901.xml

| 27.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 298/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 298/19

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1602/2006

of 26 October 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the import of maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the maximum reduction in the duty on maize imported into Spain from third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 (3), allows the Commission to decide, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 and on the basis of the tenders notified, to make no award.

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1839/95 a maximum reduction in the duty should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 20 October to 26 October 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the reduction in the duty on imported maize issued in Regulation (EC) No 1421/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 269, 28.9.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 177, 28.7.1995, p. 4. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1558/2005 (OJ L 249, 24.9.2005, p. 6).

3

---
### Martin, Michael (OST)

From: Sent: To: Subject: '-- ., '--

- -, . "1"- 

# '("~=--: :.J:-,:,Richard Slutzker <iifurnish2@yahoo.co.uk> ;~,,':':.',"i,I..it~esday, April 29, 2014 2:14 PM

Martin, Michael (OSn 

### ':: ,'~ i:::; ,'J 2Es'Untial Air Service From and Into Altoona/Blair County Airport

Dear Michael
Iam quite familiar with the essential air service needs of our community aswell as all ofthe pitfalls involved in providing reliable air service through a committed and dedicated carrier. Please consider the latter as meaning a carrier who iswilling tofill the planes on afrequent basis, willing to advertise, and aggressively committed to expanding both interms ofthe number offlights aswell asthe number of destinations. Air service pricing must be lowenough to be inthe $55.00 or lower range to make the airport competitive with Latrobe orthe expense insuring State College orthe expense of driving to and parking at BWI or Pin.
The number offlight is important as having multiple flights allows for making same day connections when flights are delayed or cancelled. Destinations are quite important as well and making timely connections with a hub or hubs with non-stop flights isvital to asuccessful selection of a provider to ADO. I'm certain that our Congressman Bill Shuster and the community are counting on you to get this one right so that essential air service will not only survive but indeed thrive with reasonable flight costs, frequency, and excellent connections. Personally, I hate waste on all levels including wasted opportunities so Itrust you understand my concerns as.you move forward on this alltoo important issue. Sincerely, Richard Slutzker
611 Ruskin Drive Altoona, PA 16602-2925 (P)814.943.7503

1
#### Fred. G. Herrick *vs.*Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company.

November 27, 1884.

After the decision of a former appeal in this action, which is reported in 31 Minn. 11, a new trial was had in the district court for Freeborn county, before *Farmer,*J., and a jury, and plaintiff had a verdict for $2,000. Judgment was entered and the defendant appealed.

Upon the trial the defendant offered in evidence a written contract between the plaintiff and Lovely & Morgan, his attorneys, wherein, after reciting that the plaintiff has no money to prosecute this action, the plaintiff in consideration of Lovely & Morgan agreeing to conduct the suit and to make no charge against him for their services in case they fail to collect anything from the railway company, employs and retains them to prosecute the action and to collect his claim from the railway company, and agrees that they may retain as compensation for their services and expenses in this action fifty per cent, of the entire sum collected. This was excluded by the court, upon the ground that it was immaterial and did not give Lovely & Morgan such an interest in the cause of action as required them to be joined as parties plaintiff.

*J. D. Springer,*for appellant.

*Lovely & Morgan,*for respondent.

*By the Court.*

There is nothing in the point that the cause of action was in part assigned to Lovely & Morgan. The. other points raised are identical with those decided by this court on the former appeal, (see 31 Minn. 11,) and we adhere to that decision.

•Judgment affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 14, 2008
    /s/ Michael P. MarrowName:
    Michael P. MarrowTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer Date: March 14, 2008
    /s/ George H. Hepburn IIIName:
    George H. Hepburn IIITitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                              RADIANT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             3925 Brookside Parkway
                            Alpharetta, Georgia 30022

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 28, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Radiant Systems,
Inc. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP stating
that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for
the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that
the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that
there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen LLP personnel working on the
audit, availability of national office consultation. Availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen is not relevant to this
audit.

Very truly yours,

Radiant Systems, Inc.


/s/ John H. Heyman
---------------------------------
John H. Heyman, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. JOHN DEERE TRACTOR COMPANY and Dain Manufacturing Company.

No. 463.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Dec. 16, 1939.

Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Robert B. Watts, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Harold W. Pike, of Moline, Ill., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Respondents ordered to cease and desist from doing certain things and to take certain affirmative action, pursuant to stipulation.
#### Theodore J. BRUECKMANN, Appellant,v. HARRIS PROPERTIES, INC., etc., et al., Appellees.

No. 4-86-3114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 20, 1988.

James C. Blecke and Susan S. Lemer, Miami, and Richard H. Willits of Easley, Massa & Willits, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O’Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

Glenn J. Webber of Ligman, Martin, Shi-ley, Neswiacheny & Evans, Fort Lauder-dale, for appellee Bullet Const.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Theodore J. Brueckmann, was a workman at a construction site. He was personally injured there when a wall toppled. He sued several defendants for damages. The trial court entered summary final judgment against Brueckmann. He appeals.

Upon review of the record and appellate advice, we are of the opinion that it was error to enter summary judgment in favor of Bonaventure, owner-builder, because there were genuine issues of material fact as to the status of Bonaventure, which status would impact upon Bonaventure’s liability to Brueckmann. There were issues as to the cause of the topple and the negligence of Bonaventure.

We reverse the summary judgment in favor of Bonaventure and remand for further proceedings.

We affirm the summary judgment in favor of Bullet Construction, Inc.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DELL, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.
#### In re Roy J. PERILLOUX.

No. 89-OB-0941.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Penlloux, Roy J.; — Plamtiff(s); applying for admission to the Louisiana State Bar; and Waiver of Code I and Code III Examinations.

The application having been considered by the conference of the Court, it is denied.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13039 and #13040]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Ohio dated 03/13/2012. *Incident:*
                         Tornadoes, High Winds and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         03/02/2012. *Effective Date:*
                         03/13/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/14/2012. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/13/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Clermont. *Contiguous Counties:* Ohio: Brown, Clinton, Hamilton, Warren. Kentucky: Bracken, Campbell, Pendleton. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.750Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13039 C and for economic injury is 13040 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Ohio, Kentucky. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: March 13, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-6684 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
302 CERTIFICATION

I, W. Ross C. Corace, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the amendment to the quarterly report on
Form 10-QSB of MailTec, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;

         4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
12a-14) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information  relating to the registrant,  including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
entities, particularly  during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: October 31, 2006                /s/W. Ross C. Corace
                                   ----------------------------
                                   W. Ross C. Corace
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer