alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**


**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATIONS**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO\** **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp.(the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),





I,
      Michael G. Wirtz, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, t hese
      financial statements were not reviewed by our independent registered public
      accountants ;
      and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations


of
      the
      Company.











Date:
      December 20, 2006








/s/
      Michael G. Wirtz


------------------------------


Chief
      Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 08-3369

________________

Linda Downey, 

Appellant,

v.

City of Carlisle, Iowa; Police

Chief Ron Fox; City Manager Neil

Ruddy; Officer Tom Bauler,

Appellees.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the

Southern District of Iowa.

 [UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: June 10, 2009

 Filed: November 27, 2009

________________

Before BYE, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. 

________________

PER CURIAM.

Linda Downey appeals the grant of summary judgment on her claims of sexual

harassment, discrimination, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. At the time of her resignation from the Carlisle

Police Department, Ms. Downey executed a broad release that released and discharged

the City of Carlisle and its employees from any claims related to her employment with

the City of Carlisle. "A voluntary waiver of claims bars future action on such claims."

Littrell v. City of Kansas City, 459 F.3d 918, 921 (8th Cir. 2006). 
1

The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the

Southern District of Iowa, presiding with the consent of the parties pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

Summary judgment on Count VI, asserting discrimination claims under Title

VII, was granted to the defendants based both on the broad terms of the release signed

by Ms. Downey and the lack of admissible evidence to support the allegations. We

have carefully reviewed de novo, see id., the magistrate judge's1

 comprehensive

memorandum and order, and we determine that an extended opinion would serve no

precedential value. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Cavalier Group
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic
Report), I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Company.

Date: January 10, 2007

/s/ Gerald W. Williams

Gerald W. WilliamsChief Financial Officer

---
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                     |                         |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                             |                                                     |                         |   |
|  Date:      August 18, 2008 | By:                                       | /s/      Deanie J. Underwood |   |
|                             | Deanie      J. Underwood                                 |                         |
|                             | Chief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer |                         |

----

----
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,Dr. Sean D. Williams, Chief Executive Officer of Webtradex International, Inc., (the "Company"), hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to my knowledge:





(1) The  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the Company.




/s/Dr. Sean D. WilliamsDr. Sean D. WilliamsChief Executive Officer





Date: November 15, 2010







This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE ex rel. Robert BUTLER v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-2295.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Robert Butler, applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs, 24th Judicial District Court, No. 82-2184, Div. “C”; Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 84-KA-0173.

Prior report: La.Ápp., 462 So.2d 1280.

Denied.
Jeffrey M. Harper FAA Office of Regional Counsel 1601 Lind Avenue Southwest Renton, Washington 98057 T (425) 227-2161 F (425) 227-1007 

# RECEIV JUL 27 2015 HEARING '--"-·'''--"'

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

In the Matter of: SkyWest Airlines, Inc. FAA Case No. 2011NM060081 DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 Honorable Richard C. Goodwin



### NOTICE OF APPEAL In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a), Complainant hereby submits Notice ofhis intent to appeal the Initial Decision ofAdministrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin, served July 16,2015. Respectfully submittedthis 22"d day of.Tuly, 2015.



### /:j; l(M. Harper 'FAAAttorney )-' 

# ,1!}

**~------~-~~**

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoingNotice ofAppeal has been served via facsimile, electronic mail and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 F (202) 366-7536 E Richard.goodwin@dot.gov Todd Emerson, Esq. SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 F (435) 634-3505 E temerson@skywest.com I hereby certify that the foregoingNotice ofAppeal has been served viafacsimile, and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591 F (202) 267-1293 Dated this 22nd day ofJuly, 2015.

Notice of Appeal In the Matter of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

### I. /'

. . "
- {.)

..,·t

__., /:- .· '

0 {**~** "1 /( / 

### If />,_ .t ){\..J/ _,;:( 

### _··kL.rr-t

_ Dana Stephenson ···· i Office ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, W A 98057 (425) 227-2007

FAA Case No. 2011NM060081, DMS No. FAA-2012-0904 Page 2 of 2 Jeffrey M. Harper, FAA Attorney T (425) 227-2161 F (425) 227-1007
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                             AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL
                         RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.

                  AMERICAN EXPRESS CREDIT ACCOUNT MASTER TRUST

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel
Related Services Company, Inc., as Servicer ("TRS"), pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, dated May 16, 1996, as amended and restated as of April 16,
2004, as amended by the First Amendment dated June 30, 2004 and by the Second
Amendment dated September 21, 2004, by and among TRS, as Servicer, American
Express Receivables Financing Corporation II, American Express Receivables
Financing Corporation III LLC and American Express Receivables Financing
Corporation IV LLC, each as Transferor, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
does hereby certify to the best of her knowledge after reasonable investigation
that:

1. TRS is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized
terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings set forth in the
Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and
deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under
my supervision.

4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,
performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement
throughout such calendar year and no default in the performance of such
obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5
below.

5. The following is a description of each Default in the performance of the
Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have
been made by the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2004,
which sets in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken
by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such default, and (iii) the current
status of each such default: NONE.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 31st
day of March, 2005.

                                               AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL
                                               RELATED SERVICES COMPANY,
                                               INC., as Servicer

                                               By:    /s/ Susanne L. Miller
                                                      ---------------------
                                               Name:  Susanne L. Miller
                                               Title: Vice President
                                                      Treasury Controller



                                     Page 1
T.C. Memo. 2015-70

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

ALVIN SHELDON KANOFSKY, Petitioner v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Docket No. 22008-13L. Filed April 8, 2015.

Alvin Sheldon Kanofsky, pro se.

Bradley C. Plovan, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUWE, Judge: Petitioner seeks review pursuant to sections 6320(b) and

(c) and 6330(d)(1) of the determination of the Internal Revenue Service to uphold 1

Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal 1

Revenue Code as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of

Practice and Procedure.
- 2 -

[*2] the filing of a notice of Federal tax lien for unpaid income tax for 2006 and

2007. Respondent has moved for summary judgment (motion) under Rule 121. 

Petitioner objects. The matter is ripe for summary judgment. 

At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Pennsylvania. 

The unpaid tax for 2006 and 2007 was the subject of a recently decided case

involving a proposed levy. Kanofsky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-34. In

that case this Court upheld the determination to proceed with the levy. The Court

rejected petitioner’s position in that case and imposed a $20,000 section

6673(a)(1) penalty because petitioner’s position was frivolous and his case had

been instituted for the sole purpose of delay.

In the instant case petitioner raises the same frivolous arguments. We

2

perceive no need to once again refute those arguments with somber reasoning and

copious citation of precedent; to do so might suggest that those arguments have

some merit. Crain v. Commissioner, 737 F.2d 1417 (5th Cir. 1984).

See also Kanofsky v. Commissioner, 424 Fed. Appx. 189 (3d Cir. 2011)

2

(per curiam), aff’g T.C. Memo. 2010-46; Kanofsky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.

2014-153. To the extent petitioner’s response (and attachments thereto) to

respondent’s motion might be construed as raising any other arguments, we find

them to be equally frivolous or irrelevant.
- 3 -

[*3] For the reasons stated in Kanofsky v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2015-34,

we uphold respondent’s determination regarding the lien and will require that

petitioner pay a penalty under section 6673(a) in the amount of $20,000.

To reflect the foregoing,

An appropriate order and

decision will be entered.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## July 29, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 

## 135847(11) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices 

## BILLY JOE HICKMAN, Plaintiff,

v SC: 135847 AGC: 2613/07, 2614/07 ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s April 28, 2008 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

d0721 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2008

Clerk
----

| (a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (c) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (a) | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (b) | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6134
GREGORY M. TAYLOR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-430-AM) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: July 30, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory M. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988), as amended by Act of Apr. 24, 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Law. Co-op.Advance Sheet June 1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent thata certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Angelone , No. CA-95-430-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
      33.1







A
      Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
      18
      U.S.C.


SECTION.
      1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF
      2002






Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of LGA Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
      for
      the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934
      and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
      September 28, 2007




/s/
      Marty Williams


Marty
      Williams


Chief
      Executive Officer, President





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
      and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
      document.
EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Know all persons by these presents that each of the undersigned has made, constituted and appointed, and BY THESE PRESENTS make, constitute and appoint Marc T.
Tanenberg and Kenneth R. Batko, true and lawful ATTORNEYS for himself and in his name, place and stead to sign that certain Annual Report on Form 10-K, including all exhibits
thereto, which Form 10-K is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 12, 2004 to be executed by the undersigned in his capacity as a Director
of APAC Customer Services, Inc., and to perform any and all other acts necessary in order to consummate such transaction, giving and granting unto Marc T. Tanenberg and Kenneth R. Batko, said
ATTORNEYS full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever, requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the
undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, with full power of substitution and revocation, hereby ratifying and confirming all that Marc T. Tanenberg and Kenneth Batko,
said ATTORNEYS or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/ Theodore S. Schwartz
/s/ Robert F. Bernard
/s/ Thomas M. Collins
/s/ John W. Gerdelman
/s/ Paul J. Liska
/s/ Samuel K. Skinner
/s/ Paul G. Yovovich
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks