alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 6, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                            /s/ Richard A. Rappaport
                            ------------------------
                            Richard A. Rappaport
                            Principal Executive Officer
                            November 8, 2005


                                       16
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2281 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2281

   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on TMP Diallyl Ether.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on TMP Diallyl Ether.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TMP DIALLYL ETHER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.01 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to TMP Diallyl Ether) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective column period and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### James D. TASKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Fred T. LOPEZ, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 18616.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Nov. 17, 1983.

James R. Hasenyager, Ogden, for plaintiff and appellant.

Lyle J. Barnes, Kaysville, for defendant and respondent.

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, who was president of Omco Corporation. Omco Corporation was plaintiff’s employer at the time he suffered an injury which the Industrial Commission determined was com-pensable as a partial permanent disability. Omco did not have insurance and became insolvent prior to the time this lawsuit was filed. Plaintiff therefore sought recovery against the defendant personally. We affirm the dismissal.

An examination of plaintiff’s complaint and arguments on appeal reveals that he *128alleges no legal theory upon which recovery may be had. Although he relies on *Samuel v. Baitcher,*247 Ga. 71, 274 S.E.2d 327 (1981), he has neither pled nor argued negligence by the corporation’s agent, which was the basis for recovery in that case. The *sole*basis for his claim for relief is the argument that “good social policy” requires recovery. Such an argument must be directed to the Legislature, and in the absence of any other legal theory, such as negligence or alter ego liability, we must affirm the judgment of the trial court. No costs awarded.

HALL, C.J., and STEWART, OAKS and HOWE, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6399]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XB093

North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Notice

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council's (Council's) 
Groundfish Plan Teams and Crab Plan Team will hold a workshop on 
Assessment/Management Issues Related to Recruitment, April 4-5, 2012 at 
the Alaska Fishery Science Center.

DATES: The meetings will be held April 4-5, 2012. The meetings will 
begin at 9 a.m., April 4 and continue through Thursday April 5. Webex 
participation is available; please check the Council Web site for 
participation information.

ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at the Alaska Fisheries Science 
Center, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Building 4, Traynor Room, Seattle, WA.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 605 W. 
4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane DiCosimo or Diana Stram, North 
Pacific Fishery Management Council; telephone: (907) 271-2809.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Plan Teams will develop guidelines on 
how to address environmental changes in the Stock-Recruitment 
relationship into biological reference points and how to model 
environmental forcing into stock projection models.
    The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be 
posted at http://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during these meetings. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Gail Bendixen, (907) 271-2809, at 
least 5 working days prior to the meeting date.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-6399 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 4, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




                                        /s/ Richard A. Rappaport
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Richard A. Rappaport
                                        Principal Executive Officer
                                        November 8, 2005





                                       16
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             540
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      378
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,010
<PP&E>                                           1,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              462
<BONDS>                                            278
<COMMON>                                        13,399
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,914)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,230
<SALES>                                            889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   889
<CGS>                                              580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (31)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,922)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 11(A)




                   PHARMACIA & UPJOHN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE - PRIMARY
                      (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER-SHARE DATA)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            Years Ended December 31,
                                                                  -----------------------------------------
                                                                    1996             1995            1994
                                                                  --------         -------         --------
<S>                                                                <C>              <C>             <C>
Earnings from continuing operations                                 $561.6          $738.7          $833.4
Earnings from discontinued operations, net                                                             1.7
                                                                    ------          ------          ------
Net earnings                                                         561.6           738.7           835.1
Dividends on preferred stock, net of tax                              12.6            12.5            12.3
                                                                    ------          ------          ------
Net earnings on common stock - primary                              $549.0          $726.2          $822.8
                                                                    ------          ------          ------

Average number of common shares outstanding                          508.4           504.7           504.4
Number of common shares issuable assuming
      exercise of stock options                                        3.5             1.9              .3
Contingently issuable shares                                            .5              .5              .5
                                                                    ------          ------          ------
                                                                     512.4           507.1           505.2
                                                                    ------          ------          ------
Earnings per share - primary
      Continuing operations                                          $1.07            $1.43           $1.63
      Discontinued operations
                                                                    ------           ------          ------
      Net earnings                                                   $1.07            $1.43           $1.63
                                                                    ======           ======          ======

</TABLE>
1

The Honorable William Jay Riley became Chief Judge of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on April 1, 2010.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-2557

___________

Arlene Butters; Richard Butters, In *

the Estate of David Butters by and *

through Arlene and Richard Butters on *

Behalf of Themselves and the Estate of *

David Butters, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

David H. Ash, Judge, Circuit Court of * Eastern District of Missouri.

Pike County, Probate Division; Pike *

County Probate Court, Circuit Court of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Pike County; McIlroy and Millan Law *

Firm; Nina Long, Public Administrator; *

Community State Bank, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 16, 2010

Filed: April 22, 2010

___________

Before RILEY,1

 Chief Judge, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
2

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

-2-

Missouri inmate Richard Butters and his wife Arlene Butters appeal the district

court’s2

 dismissal of their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging a conspiracy to “rob

and loot” the estate of David Butters, Richard Butters’s father. Upon careful de novo

review, see Hodak v. City of St. Peters, 535 F.3d 899, 903 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo

review of determination as to plaintiff’s standing); Schaaf v. Residential Funding

Corp., 517 F.3d 544, 549 (8th Cir. 2008) (de novo review of grant of motion to

dismiss); Cooper v. Schriro, 189 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (de novo

review of dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A), we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark Shapiro, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Central Parking
Corporation;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

      4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

      5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: December 17, 2004                       By: /s/ MARK SHAPIRO
                                                 ------------------------
                                                 Mark Shapiro
                                                 Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, the panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2)(c); 10th Cir. R.

34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 19 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

JESSE A. KILGORE, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 99-6393

REGINALD HINES,

Respondent-Appellee.

(D.C. No. CIV-99-431-C)

(W.D. Okla.)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before BALDOCK, HENRY, and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.**

 

Petitioner Jesse A. Kilgore, Jr., proceeding pro se, appeals the district

court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

The district court denied Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on

appeal, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), and denied his application for a certificate of
1

 Petitioner has since paid the appellate filing fee, rendering his application

to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal moot.

-2-

appealability, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). We deny Petitioner’s application for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss Petitioner’s appeal. 1

Petitioner was convicted of unlawful delivery of a controlled drug in the

District Court of Lincoln County, Oklahoma, and sentenced to 22.5 years

imprisonment. The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed on March 17,

1996. On March 31, 1999, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 claiming ineffective assistance of counsel at trial

and on appeal. The magistrate judge issued a thorough report and

recommendation denying the petition as untimely because Petitioner failed to file

his petition within the one-year statute of limitations set forth in 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d). The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation and summarily dismissed the petition. The district court

subsequently denied Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability.

We have thoroughly reviewed the record on appeal, Petitioner’s brief, the

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and the district court’s order. We

deny Petitioner’s application for a certificate of appealability for substantially the

reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation.
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court,

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                        Subsidiaries of the Company

All subsidiaries do business under the respective names listed below.

 1.   Investors Capital Trust I
       Delaware Trust

 2.   Investors Bank & Trust Company
       Massachusetts chartered trust company

 3.   Investors Safe Deposit Corp.
       Massachusetts corporation

 4.   IBT Trust Company (Cayman) Ltd.
       incorporated in the Cayman Islands

 5.   Investors Securities Corporation
       Massachusetts securities corporation

 6.   IBT Fund Services (Canada) Inc.
       incorporated in Canada

 7.   Investors Trust Holdings Ireland
       organized in the Republic of Ireland

 8.   Investors Financial Services (Ireland) Ltd.
       organized in the Republic of Ireland

 9.   Investors Trust & Custodial Services (Ireland) Ltd.
       organized in the Republic of Ireland

10.   Investors Fund Services (Ireland) Ltd.
       organized in the Republic of Ireland
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2175 

To extend the suspension of duty on thionyl chloride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on thionyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.28.01 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 thionyl chloride) is amended by striking the date in the 

7 effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS