alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         845750
<NAME>                        WNC CALIFORNIA HOUSING TAX CREDITS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              83,943
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    83,943
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,526,490
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,932,242
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,526,490
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,549
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      138,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   476,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (611,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (611,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (611,734)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (81.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. Louis BUCHALTER, Appellant, v. Leo LOWENTHAL, Marshal, Appellee.

No. 226.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1940.

Fred D. Kaplan, of New York City, for appellant.

John T. Cahill and Stanley H. Fuld, both of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on the opinion in the foregoing case denying a motion for a stay. 2 Cir., 108 F.2d 863.
#### E. E. West, John Coffee and F. R. Steadman, late partners lately doing business under the firm name of West & Coffee, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. J. M. Davis, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, Division A,

June 27, 1905.)

Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Hamilton County; Bascom H. Palmer, Judge.

*Cooper & Cooper, Rees & Rees, Robinson, Small*and *Stephens,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*M. F. Home*and *C. D. Tuten,*for Defendant in Error.

Decision

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiffs in error. There was judgment for the plaintiff and the defendants take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1926 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound of strontium 

chloroapatite-europium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on compound 

of strontium chloroapatite-europium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMPOUND OF STRONTIUM CHLOROAPATITE4 EUROPIUM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.66 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 compound of strontium chloroapatite-europium) is amend8 ed by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1926 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Certifications      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of                Section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Registrant. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                                                                                                                                    |                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August              13, 2007 | By:                                                                                                                                           | /s/ JOHN              S.              KOVACH   |
|                                    | John                S. Kovach                                                                                                                           |
|                                    | Chief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal                financial and accounting                officer)  |

 

----
#### Ronald J. FOREMAN, Executor of the Succession of J.Y. Foreman v. Michael MONTGOMERY and the Succession of James Boring Montgomery, M.D.

No. 86-C-2407.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 9, 1987.

In re Montgomery, J. Boring Jr.; Montgomery, J.B. Succ. of; applying for writ of *88certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 85-1222; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 82-2670-D.

Prior report: La.App., 496 So.2d 1280.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2100

          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sensors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sensors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SENSORS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Sensors (provided   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        for in subheading                                                  31/2011.......
                        9030.33.00)
                        certified by the
                        importer to
                        monitor and
                        report voltage,
                        current and
                        temperature
                        status of battery
                        cells designed
                        for use in
                        electrically
                        powered vehicles
                        of subheading
                        8703.90 in which
                        an on board
                        gasoline engine
                        is used to run a
                        generator that
                        recharges the
                        electric drive
                        motor battery....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|October 20, 2006
#### STATE ex rel. Charles David PHILLIPS v. Richard STALDER, Warden, Wade Correctional Center.

No. 88-KH-2500.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Phillips, Charles David; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or re*890medial writ; Parish of DeSoto, 11th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 43146.

Denied.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132643(38) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132643 

 COA: 270130 

Saginaw CC: 05-025915-FH 

MARCEL OMAR BEVERLY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s May 2, 2007 

order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated May 2, 2007. 

On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2006 order of the 

Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court for a determination 

of whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, for the appointment of appellate counsel, 

in light of Halbert v Michigan, 545 US 605; 125 S Ct 2582; 162 L Ed 2d 552 (2005). 

Appointed counsel may file an application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, 

and/or any appropriate postconviction motions in the trial court, within six months of the 

date of the circuit court’s order appointing counsel. Counsel may include among the 

issues raised, but is not required to include, those issues raised by the defendant in his 

application for leave to appeal to this Court. In all other respects, leave to appeal is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should 

now be reviewed by this Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 34.2 

**Porter Keadle Moore LLC**

**CPAs| Advisors| www.pkm.com**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

TransCentra, Inc.: 

We have examined management’s assessment for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in theaccompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Assertion”), that TransCentra, Inc. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in 

Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Regulation AB for services by theCompany that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the “Platform”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria arenot applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion onmanagement’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during thespecified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly,such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the periodspecified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Porter Keadle Moore LLC 

February 4, 2014 

235 Peachtree Street NE| Suite 1800| Atlanta, Georgia 30303| Phone 404-588-4200| Fax 404-588-4222
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2338 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2338

           To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the suspension of duty on Chloroacetone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHLOROACETONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.05 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Chloroacetone) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Snyder, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                    |      |                          |   |
|-------------------------|-----------|-------------------------------|--------|
| Date: November 16, 2009 | By:  | /s/ Jonathan Snyder           |   |
|                    |      |                               |   |
|                    |      | Jonathan Snyder               |   |
|                    |      | Chief Executive Officer       |   |
|                    |      | (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12




             PHARMACIA & UPJOHN, INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Years Ended December 31,
                                                        -------------------------------------------------------
                                                        1997       1996          1995      1994        1993
                                                        -------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>      <C>         <C>          <C>
Earnings from continuing operations before
 income taxes                                             $468         $838     $1,136      $1,271       $778

Less: Equity in undistributed net income
 (loss) of companies owned less than 50%                   (32)           5          7           8          8
                                                      --------     --------   --------    --------   --------
                                                          $500          833      1,129       1.263        770

Add: Amortization of previously capitalized
 interest                                                   12           11         10           8          6

Fixed charges included in the above:
 Interest and amortization of debt expense                 121           82        121         139        209

Rental expense representative of an
  interest factor                                           38           37         35          35         32
                                                      --------     --------   --------    --------   --------

Earnings from continuing operations before
 income taxes and fixed charges                           $671         $963     $1,295      $1,445     $1,017
                                                      ========     ========   ========    ========   ========

Interest incurred and amortization of debt
 expense                                                    90          115        149         164        234

Rental expense representative of an
 interest factor                                            38           37         35          35         32
                                                      --------     --------   --------    --------   --------
Total fixed charges                                       $128         $152       $184        $199       $266
                                                      ========     ========   ========    ========   ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        5.25         6.33       7.05        7.24       3.82
                                                      ========     ========   ========    ========   ========
</TABLE>