alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7825]

      ( print page 14855)    
Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I hereby determine that the organization known as Jemmah Anshorut Tauhid, also known as Jemmah Ansharut Tauhid, also known as Jem'mah Ansharut Tauhid, also known as Jamaah Ansharut Tauhid, also known as Jama'ah Ansharut Tauhid, committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that “prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,” I determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the measures authorized in the Order.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: February 23, 2012.

Hillary Rodham Clinton,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-6079 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with Quarterly Report of China Energy Corporation and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, WenXiang Ding, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      October 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      WenXiang DingName:    WenXiang
      DingTitle:     
      Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2275 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration 

systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS WITH A CARGO 

4 STORAGE FROM 701 TO 1400 CUBIC INCHES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2275 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Insulated hydration systems 

with an outer surface of textile materials whose interior 

incorporates a flexible plastic 

container of a kind for storing and dispensing potable 

beverages through attached 

flexible tubing and which 

have a cargo storage capacity 

from 701 through 1400 cubic 

inches (provided for in subheading 4202.92.30) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
#### Bruce E. HARMESON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph P. SACCHET, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 03-6030.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 30, 2003.

Decided June 13, 2003.

Bruce E. Harmeson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Bruce E. Harmeson, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2241 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1040, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harmeson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. The motion to amend the informal brief is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.2 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Annette Eggert, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                    |   |                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 16, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Annette Eggert                                                                                         |
|                    |   |                                                                                                            |
|                    |   | Annette Eggert                    Chief Financial Officer                    (Principal Financial Officer) |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6915

SEQUOIA MCKINNON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (8:22-cv-01205-RMG)

Submitted: May 18, 2023 Decided: May 22, 2023

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sequoia McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6915 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Sequoia McKinnon seeks to appeal the district court’s orders (1) accepting, in part, 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely McKinnon’s 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition; and (2) denying McKinnon’s motion for reconsideration. See 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petitions are 

subject to one-year statute of limitations, running from latest of four commencement dates 

enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief 

on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez, 565 U.S. at 140-41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKinnon has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny all 

pending motions, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6915 Doc: 25 Filed: 05/22/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### UNITY BROADCASTERS, Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee.

No. 02-1101.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 25, 2003.

*785Before EDWARDS, RANDOLPH, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record from the Federal Communications Commission and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. It is

Ordered and Adjudged that the order of the Commission reinstating the application of Abundant Life, Inc., for a construction permit for a new FM station be affirmed.

Unity Broadcasters challenges the decision of the Commission to reinstate the application of its competitor, Abundant Life, Inc., for a construction permit for a new FM station in Hattiesburg, Mississippi. The Chief of the FM Branch and the Office of the Managing Director had dismissed the application for failure to pay the required hearing fee by the deadline established in a public notice. The Commission reversed and reinstated the application, finding that Abundant’s counsel reasonably relied on the Commission’s pronouncements in restricting his search of the public notices such that he did not find the notice setting the deadline, which resulted in Abundant failing to pay the fee on time.

Due process precludes an agency from penalizing a party for violating a rule unless the agency provides adequate notice of the substance of the rule. *Satellite Broad. Co. v. FCC,*824 F.2d 1, 3 (D.C.Cir.1987). If an agency determines that its rule did not provide adequate notice, that is sufficient justification not to penalize a party and to grant a waiver of the rule. *See High Plains Wireless, L.P. v. FCC,*276 F.3d 599, 607 (D.C.Cir.2002). As the Commission found, Abundant’s counsel reasonably interpreted the unclear pronouncements of the Commission in limiting his search of the public notices to the close of the amendment period forward because he believed the hearing fee deadline would not be determined until after that period expired. Therefore the Commission’s decision to reinstate the application was neither arbitrary nor capricious.

Unity’s argument that Abundant’s president had actual knowledge of the hearing fee deadline was not properly presented to the Commission. In its opposition to Abundant’s application for review by the Commission, Unity addressed the argument only in a footnote that did not sufficiently describe the factual basis of the argument. Although Unity pointed to affidavits and documentary evidence in its petition for reconsideration, the Commission properly dismissed the petition because the reinstatement of an application is interlocutory and therefore not subject to a petition for reconsideration. *See*47 C.F.R. § 1.106(a)(1).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of *786the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. R. 41.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-005-113   225 -3-054-CV

FiInNoOvVaA CaApPiItTaAlL CoOrRpPoOrRaAtTiIoOnNTHE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeE 	APPELLANTS

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

	V.

JoOeE B. RuUpPeE, O.D., P.C. aAnNdD JoOeE B. RuUpPeEDAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsS 	APPELLEESS

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM THE 78th78ththTH78TH DISTRICT   48TH 158TH       158TH DISTRICT COURT OF  WICHITA           DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “aapAppellant, fINOVAFinova Capital Corporation’s Joint Motion tTo Dismiss for Mootness.”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court'’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(21), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DMDD:	LIVINSGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMNAN, JJ.m

MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003  January 18926, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2389 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2389

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetic acid, cyano[3-[(6-
methoxy-2-benzothiazolyl)amino]-1H-isoindol-1-yl idene]-, pentyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetic acid, cyano[3-[(6-
methoxy-2-benzothiazolyl)amino]-1H-isoindol-1-yl idene]-, pentyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETIC ACID, CYANO[3-[(6-METHOXY-2-BENZOTHIAZOLYL)AMINO]-1H-
              ISOINDOL-1-YL IDENE]-, PENTYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.94 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acetic acid, cyano[3-[(6-
methoxy-2-benzothiazolyl)amino]-1H-isoindol-1-yl idene]-, pentyl ester) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
null

2014-01-22

367.26154

eng - Argued: 2014-01-22. Docket number: 12-2296
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2194 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ion exchange resin powder. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ion exchange 

resin powder. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN POWDER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.78 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ion exchange resin powder) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2194 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Edward CANNON, Sr. v. Dr. Ralph GESSNER, St. Charles Hospital, Dr. Mark Juneau, and their Professional Liability Insurers, L.A.M.M.I.C.O. and Louisiana Hospital Association Trust Fund, and Lammico.

No. 89-CA-82.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

June 16, 1989.

Harold A. Thomas, Lloyd W. Hayes, Barbara R. Athmann, New Orleans, for defendants/appellees Dr. Ralph Gessner and Louisiana Medical Mut. Ins. Co. (LAMMI-CO) and Dr. Mark Juneau.

Peter T. Dazzio, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees St. Charles Parish Hosp.

Before CHEHARDY, GAUDIN and GRISBAUM, JJ.

GAUDIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by Edward Cannon, Sr. from a jury verdict dismissing his malpractice claims. The trial was held on September 26 and 28, 1988, and the judgment formally signed on December 12, 1988. We affirm the verdict in favor of Dr. Ralph Gessner and other named defendants and the directed verdict in favor of Dr. Mark Juneau.

The record strongly indicates that neither Dr. Gessner nor any other appellee was guilty of any negligent act or omission. Mr. Cannon, according to the clear preponderance of expert medical testimony, was properly treated in line with acceptable orthopedic procedures.

Although Mr. Cannon failed to submit a brief, our evaluation of the evidence and testimony convinces us that the jury decision was correct. We affirm the jury verdict and the trial judge’s granting of the directed verdict in favor of Dr. Juneau, with Mr. Cannon to bear costs of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

49) IV-E-44 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM Sheet 49 of 117 
P.2 

Memo 

A-10-3>1 

IF- E*-44-

To: 

From: 

Date: 

Subject: 

Air Docket A-90-37 

Jon Devine 

June 30,1999 

Meeting to Discuss NSR Reform Proposal 

On June 22, 1999, a meeting was held between representatives of the U.S. EPA Office of 

General Counsel and attorneys from the law firm of Hunton & Williams. The meeting took place 

at 1:00 PM in the Waterside Mall. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss legal theories 

underlying suggested revisions to the new source review program advocated by the Utility Air 

Regulatory Group (UARG). 

Meeting attendees included: 

Henry Nickel, Hunton & Williams 

William Brownell, Hunton & Williams 

Alan Eckert, EPA/OGC 

Gregory Foote, EPA/OGC 

Jon Devine, EPA/OGC 

1
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Charys Holding Company, Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raymond
J. Smith, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: August 15, 2005

                                 /s/ Raymond J. Smith
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Raymond J. Smith, Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2461 

To suspend temporarily the duty on didecanoyl peroxide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORNYN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on didecanoyl peroxide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIDECANOYL PEROXIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Didecanoyl peroxide (CAS 

No. 762–12–9) (provided for 

in subheading 2915.90.50) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2461 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS