alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2355 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2355

     To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Propanediaminium, N-[3-
                   [[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-
     propenyl)amino]propyl]ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-
  N,N,N',N',N'-pentamethyl-, trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3-Propanediaminium, N-[3-
                   [[[dimethyl[3-[(2-methyl-1-oxo-2-
     propenyl)amino]propyl]ammonio]acetyl]amino]propyl]-2-hydroxy-
  N,N,N',N',N'-pentamethyl-, trichloride, polymer with 2-propenamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,3-PROPANEDIAMINIUM, N-[3-[[[DIMETHYL [3-[(2-METHYL-1-OXO-
              2-PROPENYL)AMINO]
              PROPYL] AMMONIO] ACETYL] AMINO] PROPYL]-2-HYDROXY-
              N,N,N',N',N'- PENTAMETHYL-, TRICHLORIDE, POLYMER WITH 2-
              PROPENAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      1,3-                Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        Propanediaminium,                                                  31/2011.......
                        N-[3-
                        [[[dimethyl[3-
                        [(2-methyl-1- oxo-
                        2- propenyl)
                        amino] propyl]
                        ammonio]
                        acetyl]amino]
                        propyl] -2-
                        hydroxy-
                        N,N,N',N',N'-
                        pentamethyl-,
                        trichloride,
                        polymer with 2-
                        propenamide (CAS
                        No. 916155-61-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3906.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2418

  To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic 
                             filament tow.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mrs. Hagan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on acrylic or modacrylic synthetic 
                             filament tow.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC FILAMENT TOW.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Acrylic filament    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          tow containing 85                                                  31/2011.......
                          percent or more
                          by weight of
                          acrylonitrile
                          units and 2
                          percent or more
                          but not over 3
                          percent of water,
                          raw white
                          (undyed),
                          crimped, with an
                          average filament
                          decitex of 4.1
                          (plus or minus 10
                          percent) and an
                          aggregate
                          filament measure
                          in the tow bundle
                          from 660,000 to
                          1,200,000
                          decitex, with a
                          length greater
                          than two meters
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          5501.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.66 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.

The undersigned have executed this Certification effective as of May 8, 2009.



/s/ THEODORE R. SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer andDirector(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ WILLIAM R. LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer,Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made
before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Freddie M. Kotek                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Freddie                M. Kotek                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | August                14, 2007                                         |
#### The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Lee WHITE, Defendant, and Jeff Carroll, Witness-Appellant.

No. 83CA1177.

Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. III.

Jan. 24, 1985.

Duane Woodard, Atty. Gen., Charles B. Howe, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Richard H. Forman, Sol. Gen., Cynthia D. Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for plaintiff-appellee.

Bruno and Bruno, P.C., David J. Bruno, Lakewood, for witness-appellant.

METZGER, Judge.

Jeff Carroll appeals an order of the trial court denying his motion for return of *871seized property. We reverse and remand with directions.

Carroll, a police officer for the City and County of Denver, testified pursuant to subpoena as a prosecution witness during the criminal trial of defendant, Ronald Lee White. During the trial, Carroll’s Smith and Wesson .38 caliber service revolver, which was allegedly used by White to commit second degree murder and which was seized from White at the time of his arrest, was admitted as evidence. White was acquitted. Six days later, Carroll filed a motion seeking return and release of his service revolver. The trial court found that Carroll was the rightful owner of the gun, and, although all parties indicated that they had no objections to its return, the court ordered the gun to be confiscated and destroyed.

Carroll contends that the court’s failure to return his revolver constituted prejudicial and reversible error. We agree.

It is fundamental to the integrity of the criminal justice process that property involved in the proceeding, against which no government claim lies, be returned promptly to its rightful owner. *People v. Buggs,*631 P.2d 1200 (Colo.App. 1981). *See also United States v. Wilson,*540 F.2d 1100 (D.C.Cir.1976). Criminal exhibits may be retained for 30 days after acquittal or dismissal during which time parties or original custodians of the exhibit shall be given an opportunity to claim the exhibit. E. Zimny, Jr., *Colorado Records Management Manual*§ 2407 (rev. November 1983) (incorporated in Crim.P. 55(f)).

Here, Carroll filed a motion for return of his property six days after a jury found the defendant not guilty. The revolver was not contraband nor the fruit of illegal activity by Carroll. Furthermore, it was undisputed that Carroll was the legal owner. Although the trial court properly retained the gun until all evidentiary uses had been completed, it had a duty to return it to Carroll once its need for the gun had terminated.

The order is reversed and the cause is remanded with directions to the trial court to order the return of the service revolver.

BERMAN and BABCOCK, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         129,482                 658,742
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  252,000                 316,782
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               381,482                 975,524
<PP&E>                                          60,315                 839,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,798               1,814,539
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (852,375)                486,966
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          1                       0
<COMMON>                                       (61,181)              1,327,573
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,798               1,814,539
<SALES>                                        595,613                 763,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               607,076                 814,938
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,453,855               2,577,728
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                31,739                 264,222
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,699                   5,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,883,217)             (2,032,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                      749,433                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,632,650)             (2,027,845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.30)                  (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
#### Nelson B. DETILLIER Sr. v. SCAFCO LTD.

No. 87-CD-0466.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re SCAFCO Ltd.; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review, and mandamus; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 280-875.

Denied.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Abatix Environmental Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on 
Form S-8 (No. 33-59078 and No. 33-63265) of Abatix Environmental Corp. of our 
report dated February 23, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets 
of Abatix Environmental Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 1995 and 
1994, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' 
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended 
December 31, 1995, and the related schedule, which report appears in the 
December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of Abatix Environmental Corp.  
Our report refers to a change in method of accounting for income taxes in 
1993.

                           	/s/KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 13, 1996
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129188 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129188 COA: 252373 Wayne CC: 03-008857-01 SEAN PATRICK TERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
POWER OF ATTORNEY
 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 SIGNATURE
    
    TITLE
    
    DATE/s/ Merton J. Segal
    
    Chairman and Director
    
    February 13, 2009Merton J. Segal/s/ Robert S. Cubbin
    
    President, Chief Executive
    
    February 13, 2009Robert S. Cubbin
    
    Officer and Director/s/ Robert W. Sturgis
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Robert W. Sturgis/s/ David K. Page
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009David K. Page/s/ Hugh W. Greenberg
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Hugh W. Greenberg




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
    
    TITLE
    
    DATE/s/ Bruce E. Thal
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Bruce E. Thal/s/ Joseph S. Dresner
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Joseph S. Dresner/s/ Herbert Tyner
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Herbert Tyner/s/ Florine Mark
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Florine Mark/s/ Robert H. Naftaly
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Robert H. Naftaly/s/ Robert F. Fix
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Robert F. Fix/s/ Jeffrey A. Maffett
    
    Director
    
    February 13, 2009Jeffrey A. Maffett
#### Darnell TILLISON v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0928.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 16, 1993.

Robert T. Laster, Jr., Carothers Fedric & Laster, Grenada, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Jackson, Wayne Snuggs, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal No. 6061 from Judgment dated August 12, 1991, Clarence E. Morgan, Jr., Ruling Judge, Grenada County Circuit Court.

Before HAWKINS, C.J., and SULLIVAN and SMITH, JJ.

Affirmed.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITIORS





To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Abatix Corp.:

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  registration  statement  No.
333-95187  on Form S-3 of Abatix  Corp.  of our report  dated  February 29, 2000
relating to the consolidated  balance sheets of Abatix Corp. and subsidiaries as
of  December  31,  1999 and 1998,  and the  related  statements  of  operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows and the related financial statement schedule
for each of the years in the three year period ended  December  31, 1999,  which
report  appears in the  December  31, 1999 annual  report on Form 10-K of Abatix
Corp.

KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2000
#### SOUTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT d/b/a Memorial Hospital, Petitioner, v. Steven Robert GAUDIA, Jr., etc., et al., Respondents.

No. 88-1659.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Nov. 2, 1988.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 12, 1988.

Susan L. Dolin of Conrad, Scherer & James, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Larry Klein of Klein & Beranek, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

We grant the petition for certiorari and quash the discovery order of the trial court without prejudice to the respondent to seek discovery in accord with the provisions of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(2). *See Humana of Florida, Inc. v. Evans,*519 So.2d 1022 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987); and *North Broward Hospital District v. Judson,*439 So.2d 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.

ANSTEAD, Judge,

dissenting.

This is a case of statutory construction. Section 395.041(4), Florida Statutes (1987), provides that incident reports shall be prepared by hospitals as part of their risk management programs whenever an unusual incident concerning a patient occurs. The section further provides that such incident reports:

> shall be considered to be a part of the work papers of the attorney defending the establishment in litigation relating thereto and shall be subject to discovery, but shall not be admissible as evidence in court, nor shall any person filing an inci*881dent report be subject to civil suit by virtue of such incident report.

The cases cited in the majority opinion hold that the incident reports are subject to discovery only upon a showing of undue hardship in securing the same information as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(2). In my view that constitutes judicially engrafting a condition upon the statute that the legislature did not intend. I recognize that there are strong policy reasons for protecting incident reports from discovery. However, the legislature *expressly*decided that such reports *“shall be subject to discovery,*but shall not be admissible as evidence in court....” (Emphasis supplied). That express and clear provision leaves virtually no room for judicial construction, much less a judicial construction which concludes that such reports shall *not*be subject to discovery unless a hardship showing is made pursuant to rule 1.280(b)(2).

We regularly struggle with imprecise words chosen by the legislature to express its intent and strive mightily to identify the underlying policy in order to carry it out. In rare instances we even ignore the actual words used in order to avoid an absurd or irrational result. Here the result of accepting the plain meaning of the words used cannot be said to be absurd. I think we should take the legislature at its word, not ours.