alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


November 10, 2020


 


Crackle Plus, LLC


132 E. Putnam Avenue, Floor 2


Cos Cob, Connecticut 06807


Attention: Mr. William J. Rouhana, Jr.


Email: wrouhana@chickensoupforthesoul.com


 


Re: Extension of Exercise Period


 


Dear Bill:


 


Reference is hereby
made to (a) that certain Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “LLC Agreement”) dated
as of May 14, 2019 by and among Crackle Plus, LLC (the “Company”), Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment,
Inc. (“CSSE”) and CPE Holdings, Inc., as successor in interest of Crackle, Inc. (“CPE”),
and (b) that certain Contribution Agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”), dated as of March 27, 2019, by and
among CSSE, CPE and the Company. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in
the LLC Agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree as follows:


 


		1.	Pursuant to Sections 9.03 and 9.04 of the LLC Agreement,
during the six (6) month period commencing May 14, 2020 and ending November 14, 2020 (the “Exercise Period”),
CPE currently has the right, in its sole discretion, to exercise either the Put Option or the Conversion Right (the “Equity
Options”).



 


		2.	CPE is currently considering the Equity Options diligently
and in good faith, and has notified the other parties hereto that it would like to extend the Exercise Period by one (1) additional
month to end December 14, 2020. The parties hereto hereby agree to extend the Exercise Period by one (1) additional month to end
at 5PM NY time on December 14, 2020.



 


		3.	The parties hereto further agree to extend the period
during which CPE may request a refund of its reasonable, documented, third-party expenses in accordance with Section 9.5(a) of
the Contribution Agreement to end at 5PM NY time on December 14, 2020.



 


		4.	Except as expressly set forth in this Extension of
Exercise Period Letter, the terms of the LLC Agreement and the Contribution Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



 


[Signature Page Follows.]




     


     


    

 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	CPE Holdings, Inc.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Eric Gaynor	 
	 	Name: Eric Gaynor
	 	Title: Assistant Secretary


 


 


Acknowledged and Agreed:


 


Crackle Plus, LLC


 


	By: 	/s/ William J. Rouhana, Jr.	 



Name: William J. Rouhana, Jr.


Title: CEO


Date: November 12, 2020


 


Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc.


 





	By: 	/s/ William J. Rouhana, Jr.	 


Name: William J. Rouhana, Jr.


Title: CEO


Date: November 12, 2020
NO. 07-01-372-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 7, 2001

________________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF A. N. H., a CHILD

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 48,249-A; HON. DAVID L. GLEASON, PRESIDING

_______________________________ 

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.

The brief of appellant, Rebecca Vaughn, was due on October 19, 2001. It was not

filed by that deadline. This circumstance was made known to her by letter from this court

dated October 26, 2001. Furthermore, in that same letter, we 1) directed her to explain,

by November 5, 2001, why the brief was not so filed and 2) told her that her failure to so

respond could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. The fifth of

November, 2001, passed without appellant responding to our letter of October 26th, filing

an appellant’s brief, or moving for an extension of time to file such a brief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution pursuant to Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3(b) and (c).

Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable J. Michael Seabright, United States District Judge for **

the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

PEDRO ENRIQUE MEDRANO-CRUZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10046

D.C. No. 4:03-cr-00658-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 10, 2013*** 

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges. 

Pedro Enrique Medrano-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. 

FILED

JUN 13 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10046

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Medrano-Cruz’s counsel

has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to

withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Medrano-Cruz the opportunity

to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief

has been filed. 

Medrano-Cruz has waived his right to appeal the sentence imposed upon

revocation of supervised release. Our independent review of the record pursuant to

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the

validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.

2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 33 - A
                               Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of LGA Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: October 21, 2005
/s/ Marty Williams
-----------------------------------
Marty Williams
Chief Executive Officer, President

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of LGA Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: October 21, 2005
/s/ Sara Williams
---------------------------------------
Sara Williams
Treasurer (principal financial officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the Geriatrics and Gerontology Advisory Committee will be held on April 11-12, 2012, in Room 530 at the Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC. On April 11, the session will begin at 8:30 a.m. and end at 5 p.m. On April 12, the session will begin at 8 a.m. and end at 12 noon. This meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on all matters pertaining to geriatrics and gerontology. The Committee assesses the capability of VA health care facilities and programs to meet the medical, psychological, and social needs of older Veterans and evaluates VA programs designated as Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

The meeting will feature presentations and discussions on VA's geriatrics and extended care programs, aging research activities, updates on VA's employee staff working in the area of geriatrics (to include training, recruitment and retention approaches), Veterans Health Administration (VHA) strategic planning activities in geriatrics and extended care, recent VHA efforts regarding dementia and program advances in palliative care, and performance and oversight of VA Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers.

                    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee to Mrs. Marcia Holt-Delaney, Program Analyst, Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care (10P4G), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, or via email at                     *Marcia.Holt-Delaney@va.gov.*                     Individuals who wish to attend the meeting should contact Mrs. Holt-Delaney at (202) 461-6769.                

Dated: March 7, 2012.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5980 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended    March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Katherine A Ostruszka, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section     1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.





Date:  May
      1, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Katherine A
      OstruszkaKatherine
      A Ostruszka
                  Chief
      Financial Officer & Controller
                  (Principal
      Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14505-14506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-BB69


New England Fishery Management Council (Council); Notice of 
Intent (NOI) To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); 
Reopening of Comment Period

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Reopening of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14506]]

SUMMARY: This action reopens the comment period of a notice published 
on December 21, 2011. The original comment period on the notice closed 
at 5 p.m., E.S.T., March 1, 2012; however, the Council's Executive 
Committee voted to reopen the comment period an additional 60 days. 
This notice reopens the comment period to 5 p.m., E.S.T., April 30, 
2012.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before 5 p.m., E.S.T., 
on April 30, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Travis Ford, Fishery Management 
Specialist, 978-281-9233.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS published a NOI to prepare an EIS and 
announced public scoping meetings for the Council's Amendment 18 to the 
Northeast Multispeces Fishery Management Plan on December 21, 2011 (76 
FR 79153). The comment period for the subject document closed on March 
1, 2012. The Council's Executive Committee voted to reopen the comment 
period an additional 60 days. The closing date for comments has been 
extended to 5 p.m., E.S.T., April 30, 2012.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 6, 2012.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-5919 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Affirm and Opinion Filed March 7, 2023 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00309-CR KADE BRIAN LAND ERS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TE XAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 072955 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Pedersen, III, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel Kade Brian Landers appeals his convic tion for sexual assault of a child. See
T EX
. P ENAL C ODE 22.011(a)(2)(A). La nders pleaded guilty, and the trial court assessed a twenty-year sentence. Appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief under Anders v. California in which he stated that after thor ough review, he ha s found no grounds for appeal with potential merit. 386 U.S. 738, 744–45 (1967). Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders by presenting a professional evaluation of–2– the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See Stafford
v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 n.3 (T ex. Crim. App. 1991). In compliance with Kelly v. State , counsel (1) notified La nders of his motion to withdraw, (2) provided him a copy of th e motion and the brief, (3) informed him of his right to file a pro se response, (4) informed him of his right to seek discretionary review should this court hold the appeal frivolous, and (5) took concrete measures to facilitate his review of the appellate record. See 436 S.W.3d 313, 319 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). This c ourt afforded Landers the opportunity to file a response, but he did not do so. After appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on the ground that an appeal is frivolous, we are obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record to determine whether there is a ny arguable ground that may be raised. See Stafford , 813 S.W.2d at 511. Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82–83 (1988). After review, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support an appeal.–3– We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b)
220309F.U05 /Emil y Miskel / EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE–4– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
KADE BRIAN LANDERS, Appellant
No. 05-22-00309-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court, Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 072955. Opinion delivered by Justice Miskel. Justices Molberg and Pedersen, III participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this da te, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered this 7th day of March, 2023.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0137 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-135-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2013-0150

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2003 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2003

     To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4-
 chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]-oxymethyl] phenyl)-N-methoxycarbanose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Mr. Chambliss introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reduce temporarily the rate of duty on Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4-
 chlorophenyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]-oxymethyl] phenyl)-N-methoxycarbanose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL N-(2-[[1-(4-CHLOROPHENYL)-1H-PYRAZOL-3-YL]-OXYMETHYL] 
              PHENYL)-N-METHOXYCARBANOSE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Methyl N-(2-[[1-(4- 6.2%         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          chlorophenyl)-1H-                                                  31/2011.......
                          pyrazol-3-yl]-
                          oxymethyl]
                          phenyl)-N-
                          methoxycarbanose
                          (CAS No. 175013-
                          18-0) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2933.19.23)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Zeros & Ones, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark M. Laisure, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| |     |                                                                                                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |                                                                                                                                           | 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                                                                                                                                           | 
| | /s/ Mark M. Laisure                                                                                                                      
| | Mark M. Laisure                                                                                                                          
| | Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
| | April 2, 2007
#### STATE ex rel. Sidney MARTS v. ORLEANS PARISH PRISON, Sheriff Charles Foti, Jr.

No. 88-KH-1552.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Marts, Sidney; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”.

Denied.