alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2302 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 4000-series. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Capa 4000-series. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPA 4000-SERIES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Oxepanone, polymer with 

2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol (CAS No. 

35484–93–6) (provided for in 

subheading 3907.99.01) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2302 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Ricky D. HARRIS.

No. 87-KK-0349.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Harris, Ricky D.; applying for supervisory writ; Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 86-1051A; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 18946-KW.

Denied.

DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: March 5, 2012. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank Name
City
State
Date closed10428
Global Commerce Bank
Doraville
GA
3/2/2012


[FR Doc. 2012-5938 Filed 3-12-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings,
      Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
                Gui Hua LanName:
                Gui Hua LanTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board/s/
                Wendy FuName:
                Wendy FuTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer





November
      14, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      China Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by China
      Shenghuo Pharmaceutical Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his or her knowledge, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Bank of Wilmington Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/ Betty V. Norris    
|                      |  | Betty V. Norris        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
Memorandumi 

u.s. Deportment of 

Transportation 

OffiCe Of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: Subcontracted Flying by Alaska Seaplane for Wings of 

Alaska 

o/C~~ 

From: Dennis J. DeVany, Chief 

EAS and Domestic Analysis, X-53 

To: Gregory Frazier, S-3.6 

Reference: Orders 2008-8-16 

Date: January 4, 2009 

OAA Memo No.2009-70 

Kevin Adams, X-53 

Ext. 61047 

Order 2008-8-16 selected Wings of Alaska to provide subsidized EAS at Excursion Inlet 

through August 31,2010. The service was to consist of three nonstop round trips per 

week in the 16-week peak period and one nonstop round trip per week in the 36-week 

off-peak period. All of the service was to be provided with 5-seat Cessna 2061207 

aircraft, with weekly ceilings of $433.24 in the peak and $1,299.62 in the peak. 

Wings of Alaska has indicated that Excursion Inlet does not plow its runway in the 

winter, and so until the snow melts, which may be for several months, wheeled aircraft, 

the only aircraft currently flown by Wings of Alaska, cannot operate. Seaplane service 

could still be provided when the runway is closed. Wings of Alaska has discussed 

subcontracting its service at Excursion Inlet to Alaska Seaplane service for several 

months during the winter when it is unable to operate. 

We have contacted the community, and it does not object. Wings will be required to 

indicate on its monthly billings the days when the subcontract service was provided and 

the aircraft type and seats used on that service. Both Wings and Alaska Seaplane will be 

required to keep records consistent with our carrier-selection orders. Payments will be 

continue to be made to Wings of Alaska -- Wings of Alaska and Alaska Seaplane are 

responsible for payments to each other. 

cc: 

Rob McKinney, Wings of Alaska 

Craig Loken, Alaska Seaplane, 

Becky Rosevear, Ocean Beauty Seafoods, Inc., Excursion Inlet Facility
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3817

___________

Theresa M. Holder, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Social Security, *

*

Appellee.

___________

Submitted: December 7, 1999

Filed: December 10, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Theresa M. Holder appeals the district court's order affirming the

Commissioner's decision to deny Holder disability insurance benefits. Having carefully

reviewed the record, we conclude that no error or law or fact appears and that an

extended opinion would serve no useful purpose in this fact-intensive case. We find

substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the

Commissioner, and Holder is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm

the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2

June 16, 2010

Mr. Alexander Livnat

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

United States Environmental Protection Agency

5304P

Washington, DC 20460

Re: Request for Regional Public Hearings on the Proposed Coal Combustion

Residuals Rule, Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640

Dear Mr. Livnat:

We are writing to request public hearings on the proposed Coal Combustion Residuals

Rule. As you can imagine, people in our region have a keen interest in the outcome of this

process and for that reason we request that you hold a number of regional meetings throughout

the Southeast.

To facilitate participation of the many interested communities, we request that EPA hold

hearings in Knoxville, Tennessee; Atlanta, Georgia and; the Raleigh-Durham area of North

Carolina in addition to a public hearing in Washington, D.C. We also request that the hearing

locations be easily accessible from public transportation and that the hearings extend to at least

9:00 pm to accommodate individuals who work fulltime and who must travel to the hearing sites.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. We appreciate your action on this critical

issue and we look forward to a fair and robust comment period in which all stakeholders have the

opportunity to participate meaningfully in the rulemaking process.

Respectfully submitted by

Dr. Stephen A. Smith, Executive Director Midge Sweet, Director

Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Georgians for Smart Energy Coalition

Knoxville, Tennessee Atlanta, Georgia

Julie V. Mayfield, Executive Director Hartwell Carson

Western North Carolina Alliance French Broad Riverkeeper

Asheville, North Carolina Asheville, North Carolina
1

Chandra Brown, Executive Director Margaret Hartzell, Policy Advocate

Ogeechee Riverkeeper Environment North Carolina

Statesboro, Georgia Raleigh, North Carolina

Renée Victoria Hoyos, Executive Director Molly Diggins, State Director

Tennessee Clean Water Network North Carolina Sierra Club

Knoxville, Tennessee Raleigh, North Carolina

John McFadden, Ph.D, Executive Director Louise Gorenflo, Director

Tennessee Environmental Council Solar Valley Coalition

Nashville, Tennessee Crossville, Tennessee

Ellen Martin, Board President Jill Drzewiecki Rios, Director

Statewide Organizing for North Carolina Interfaith Power & Light

Community eMpowerment (SOCM) A Program of the NC Council of Churches

Lake City, Tennessee Asheville, North Carolina

George Friday, Co-Chair Pete MacDowell, Program Director

North Carolina Green Party Waste Awareness Reduction Network

Gastonia, North Carolina Durham, North Carolina

Donna Marie Lisenby Hope Taylor, MSPH, Executive Director

Upper Watauga Riverkeeper Clean Water for North Carolina

Boone, North Carolina Asheville and Durham, North Carolina
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2051 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2051

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 
 motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Vitter (for himself and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow refunds of Federal 
 motor fuel excise taxes on fuels used in mobile mammography vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. REFUNDS OF FEDERAL MOTOR FUEL EXCISE TAXES FOR FUEL USED IN 
              MOBILE MAMMOGRAPHY VEHICLES.

    (a) Refunds.--Section 6427 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to fuels not used for taxable purposes) is amended by 
inserting after subsection (f) the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Fuels Used in Mobile Mammography Vehicles.--Except as 
provided in subsection (k), if any fuel on which tax was imposed by 
section 4041 or 4081 is used in any highway vehicle designed 
exclusively to provide mobile mammography services to patients within 
such vehicle, the Secretary shall pay (without interest) to the 
ultimate purchaser of such fuel an amount equal to the aggregate amount 
of the tax imposed on such fuel.''.
    (b) Exemption From Retail Tax.--Section 4041 of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(n) Fuels Used in Mobile Mammography Vehicles.--No tax shall be 
imposed under this section on any liquid sold for use in, or used in, 
any highway vehicle designed exclusively to provide mobile mammography 
services to patients within such vehicle.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AT DECEMBER  31,  1997,  AND THE  CONSOLIDATED
     STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS  FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND
     IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0000845779
<NAME>                          Abatix Environmental Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          304,947
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   5,263,371
<ALLOWANCES>                    (495,092)
<INVENTORY>                     3,538,355
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9,003,473<F1>
<PP&E>                          2,106,057
<DEPRECIATION>                  (1,473,937)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  9,854,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           4,676,572
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,414
<OTHER-SE>                      5,175,263<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    9,854,249
<SALES>                         34,955,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                34,955,477
<CGS>                           25,304,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   25,304,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                7,953,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              364,683<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 1,332,713
<INCOME-TAX>                    491,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             841,106
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    841,106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .43
<FN>
<F1> AMOUNT REPRESENTS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS.
<F2> INCLUDES THE COST OF 476,250 OF COMMON SHARES IN TREASURY OF $1,408,137.
<F3> INCLUDES INTEREST EXPENSE OF $381,655, INTEREST INCOME OF $36,187 AND OTHER
EXPENSE OF $19,215.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Annette WHITAKER, Appellant, v. PIZZA HUT and State of Florida, Department of Labor and Employment Security, Unemployment Appeals Commission, Appellees.

No. 4-86-1258.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Feb. 11, 1987.

Maria L. Soto, Fort Pierce, for appellant.

Geri Atkinson-Hazelton, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Com’n.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission denying Annette Whitaker unemployment benefits because of alleged misconduct as defined in section 443.036(24), Florida Statutes (1985). *Gold-stein v. Ury Kalai M.D., P.A.,*480 So.2d 695 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Our review of the record satisfies us that Whitaker’s action of failing to follow the proper procedure for testing pizza dough was poor judgment not an intentional disregard of her employer’s interests as required by section 443.036(24).

This matter is reversed and remanded for reinstatement of Whitaker’s unemployment benefits.

LETTS, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2009 of
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick
      MontalbanChief
      Executive OfficerChief
      Financial Officer





August
14, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Majestic Oil & Gas, Inc. and will be retained by Majestic Oil & Gas,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
March 12, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

UNITED FIRE LLOYDS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00313

- CV V.

HOPE TIPPIN O/B/O LA CAMBRIA TIPPIN, A MI NOR , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Hope Tippin o/b/o LaCambria Tippin, A Minor, signed December 29, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. The record shows that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the case. We the refore VACATE the trial court’s judgment and DISMISS this case for want of jurisdiction

. We order appellant, United Fire Lloyds, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### East Coast Lumber Company, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff in Error. v. The Ellis-Young Company, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. The Ellis-Young Company, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Georgia, Plaintiff in Error, v. East Coast Lumber Company, a Corporation Under the Laws of the State of Wisconsin, Defendant in Error.

One who applies for and obtains a bill of particulars and stay of proceedings is estopped thereafter to deny jurisdiction over his person.

*216This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county.

*G. D. Rinehart*and *E. P. Axtell,*for East Coast Lumber Company.

*Cooper d Cooper*and *E. J. L’Engle,*for Ellis-Young Company.

Per Curiam.

These cases are controlled by the decision this day rendered in Putnam Lumber Company v. The Ellis-Young Company. There is, however, an additional reason why the pleas herein should have been stricken. Before filing the pleas as to jurisdiction over the person, the defendant came into court and asked for and obtained an order staying the proceedings until a bill of particulars could be furnished. This was a clear recognition of the court’s jurisdiction over the person of the defendant which it was thereby and thereafter estopped to deny.

All the justices concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 2000, and statements of operations for the year ended June
30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,300
<PP&E>                                         149,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                 131,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,066
<OTHER-SE>                                   (217,963)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,517
<SALES>                                        770,347
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               770,347
<CGS>                                          333,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  333,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               237,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,321
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,963
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
Order entered October 3, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00609-CV

E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Appellant

V.

VIRGIL HOOD AND LORRIE HOOD, Appellees

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-03619

ORDER

We GRANT the parties’ September 28, 2016 joint unopposed motion to extend times for 

filing of briefs and to adopt modified briefing schedule. We ORDER appellant’s brief and 

cross-appellants’ brief due November 15, 2016; appellees’ brief and cross-appellee’s brief due 

December 15, 2016; and appellant’s reply brief and cross-appellants’ reply brief due January 17, 

2017. 

 /s/ CRAIG T. STODDART

JUSTICE