alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2270 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain cases 

or containers to be used for electronic drawing toys, electronic games, 

or educational toys. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary suspension of duty 

on certain cases or containers to be used for electronic 

drawing toys, electronic games, or educational toys. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CASES OR CONTAINERS TO BE USED 

4 FOR ELECTRONIC DRAWING TOYS, ELEC5 TRONIC GAMES, OR EDUCATIONAL TOYS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subheading 9902.11.90 of the 

7 Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating 

8 to certain cases or containers to be used for electronic 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2270 IS

1 drawing toys, electronic games, or educational toys) is 

2 amended— 

3 (1) in the article description, by inserting after 

4 ‘‘or 9504’’ and inserting ‘‘, or educational toys or 

5 devices of heading 8543’’; and 

6 (2) in the effective period column, by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Income Opportunity Realty Investors,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald E. Kimbrough, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date:     March 31, 2003                       /s/ Ronald E. Kimbrough
     ------------------------                ----------------------------------
                                             Ronald E. Kimbrough
                                             Executive Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
                                             (Principal Financial and
                                             Accounting Officer and
                                             Acting Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Jon Suk, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mystica Candle
     Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of May, 2006.

/s/ Jon Suk
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### Edward EVANHOE, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-85-225.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

July 7, 1987.

Rehearing Denied July 31, 1987.

Gerald C. Dennis, Dennis and Branam, Antlers, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Attorney Gen., and Susan Stewart Dickerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, for appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Edward Evanhoe, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Oklahoma County for the crime of Embezzlement by Trustee, three (3) counts, and was sentenced to six (6) months imprisonment on each count, with count two (2) and count three (3) to run concurrent with count one (1), and he appeals. We affirm.

Since appellant raises a single assignment of error on appeal, we deem it unnecessary to set forth in detail the facts of this case. In his sole assignment of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in allowing privileged information in the form of testimony and checks, to be introduced in evidence by Elsa Farman, the lawyer previously retained by the appellant, which is a violation of the attorney-client privilege and is the work-product of appellant. Thus, the issue is basically whether an attorney-client relationship existed between appellant and Ms. Farman.

Ms. Farman is both an attorney and a certified public accountant. At an in camera hearing, prior to allowing Ms. Farman to testify, the trial court heard testimony from Ms. Farman and appellant, and the trial court concluded that:

> Ms. Farman was employed by appellant as an accountant purely and couldn’t — I question — he sought no legal advise, [sic] He had counsel to represent him in this case.... It appears to the court that it was for a classification of various receipts, invoices and/or checks at [sic] to whether or not they could properly be chargeable to a certain construction project and that she was not acting as his attorney in any fashion. (Tr. II, 50).

In *Cooper v. State,*671 P.2d 1168, 1172 (Okl.Cr.1983), this.Court held that whether *1380the attorney-client privilege is involved in certain testimony is a question of fact for the trial court, whose findings on conflicting evidence are controlling on appeal. Consequently, we decline to disturb the trial court’s ruling.

Additionally, we decline to disturb the trial court’s ruling that the interview and conversation of Ms. Farman and the receipts of cancelled checks from the appellant were not work product of the appellant.

The judgment and sentence is AFFIRMED.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2074 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2074

 To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 3-bromo-4'-chloro-1-(3-
      chloro-2-pyridyl)-2'-methyl-6'-(methylcarbamoyl)pyrazole-5-
                             carboxanilide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of 3-bromo-4'-chloro-1-(3-
      chloro-2-pyridyl)-2'-methyl-6'-(methylcarbamoyl)pyrazole-5-
                             carboxanilide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF 3-BROMO-4'-CHLORO-1-(3-CHLORO-2-PYRIDYL)-2'-
              METHYL-6'-(METHYLCARBAMOYL)PYRAZOLE-5-CARBOXANILIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Mixtures of 3-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          bromo-4'-chloro-1-                                                 31/2011.......
                          (3-chloro-2-
                          pyridyl)-2'-
                          methyl-6'-
                          (methylcarbamoyl)
                          pyrazole-5-
                          carboxanilide
                          (Chloroantranilip
                          role) (CAS No.
                          500008-45-7) and
                          inert ingredients
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Cutter &Buck Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30,2006 (the “Report”), I, Michael Gats, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|        | /s/ MICHAEL  GATS                              |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Michael Gats                                   |
|   | *Chief Financial Officer*                      |
|   | *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
<EOEIVDSEP212009STATEOFDELAWAREEPARECIONIllDEPARTMENTorNATURALRESOURCESOFFICEOFREGIONALADMINISTRATORANDENVIRONMENTALCONTROL89KINGSHIGHWAYPHONE:(302)739-9000DOVER,DELAWARE19901FAX:(302)739-6242September16,2009u17’Mr.WilliamC.Early(3RAOO)RECEIVEDActingRegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencySEP2’t2009RegionIII1650ArchStreetDivisOflDirector(SAPOO)Philadelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Early:IampleasedtosubmittheenclosedAmendmenttotheStateImplementationPlan(SIP)RevisionforOzone,FineParticulateMatter(PM2.5),NAAQS,andVisibility(assubmittedonDecember,2007).ThepurposeofthisamendedSIPistorespondtotheEPA’srequestsforDelawaretoclarifyandprovidesupplementallanguagetoDelaware’sStateImplementationPlanRevisionforOione,FineParticulateMatter(PM2.5),andVisibility,whichwasoriginallysubmittedonDecember17,2007.TheeffectivedateofthisamendedRevisionisSeptember1,2009.InthisamendedSIPrevision,DelawareaddressesthoserequirementsofSection110(a)andSection110(a)(2)oftheCAAwhichhavenotbeenspecificallyaddressedinotherSIPrevisions.ItremainsacompilationofcertainelementsthatdescribehowDelawaredemonstratesthatthe1997eight-hourozoneandthe1997annualPM2.5NationalAmbientAirQualityStandards(NAAQS)arebeingimplemented,maintainedandenforced.TheelementsofthisSIPrevision,onceapprovedbyEPA,willprovideafederallyenforceablewrittenconfirmationofhowDelawarewillcontinuetocomplywiththeSection110(a)(2)requirementsoftheCAA.ManyofthemiscellaneousrequirementsofSection110(a)(2)(A)-(M)oftheCAArelevanttotheeight-hourozoneandannualPM2.5NAAQSarealreadycontainedinDelaware’sSIPorinSIPrevisionswhichhavebeensubmittedto,butnotyetapprovedbyEPA.ThisSIPrevisionmetpublichearingprocessrequirementsestablishedbytheStateofDelaware,andasrequiredbyEPA,withpropernotification(30days)priortotheconveningofthepublichearing.ThehearingwasheldonAugust27,2009.AttachmentsAandBarecopiesVe€44a’zeØoodtat’wzeáftec’iddoøaf COFFICEOFTHESECRETARYCMr.WilliamEarlySeptember16,2009Page2ofaffidavitsasproofofpropernotification.ItisthepositionoftheStateofDelawarethatallminimumrequirementssetforthinthe1990CleanAirActAmendmentshavebeenmet.WelookforwardtocontinuingthecooperativeeffortbetweenDelawareandEPAinthisimportantwork.Asalways,feelfreetocontactmeorAliMirzakhalili,ProgramAdministrator,(302)739-9402,ifyouhaveanyquestionsconcerningtheencloseddocuments.SincerelCollinP.O’MaraSecretarycc:DianeEsher,EPAw/encl.DaveArnold,EPAw/encl.AliMirzakhalili
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), the undersignedofficers of Harbor Acquisition Corporation  (the “Company”), herebycertify that, to the best of their knowledge:**

1.             TheCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2006, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “QuarterlyReport”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.             Theinformation contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

**In Witness Whereof**, theundersigned have set their hands hereto as of November 14, 2006.
| /s/ Robert J. Hanks                            | ** ** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|------------|
| *Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer*        | ** ** | ** ** |
| *Principal Executive Officer*                  | ** ** | ** ** |
|                                           | ** ** | ** ** |
| /s/ Todd A. Fitzpatrick                        | ** ** | ** ** |
| *Vice President*                               | ** ** | ** ** |
| *(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)* | ** ** | ** ** |

 

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Reportto which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of theCompany under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of theForm 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained insuch filing.

 

----
---

|EXHIBIT
      32.2                                 
|---------------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER           
|PURSUANT TO                                        
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                            
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The
  Cavalier Group (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
  August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
  date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Gerald W. Williams, Chief
  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                              
|2. | the information contained in the Periodic
        Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
        and results of operations of the Company.

|    | Date: October 05, 2007    
|--- | --------------------------
|    |                           
|/s/ | Gerald
      W. Williams
|    |                           
|    | Gerald W. Williams        
|    | Chief Financial Officer   

---
#### Decatuer F. PETTY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-0713.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1988.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Bartmon, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. However, we reverse the imposition of costs on the judgment and remand with directions that the costs be stricken.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.
Filed 11/7/13 P. v. Galindo CA6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DAMIAN BUSTOS GALINDO,

Defendant and Appellant. H039721 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. B1263296)

Defendant Damian Bustos Galindo appeal s from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest to vehicle theft with a prior convictio n (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); Pen. Code, § 666.5) and delaying , resisting, and obstructing a peace officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)(1)). Defendant al so admitted allegations that he suffered a strike prior within the meaning of Penal Code sections 667, subdivisions (b) through (i) and 1170.12 as well as a prison prior within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). After denying defendant’s mo tion to dismiss the prior strike allegation pursuant to Penal Code section 1385, the tria l court sentenced defendant to state prison for four years.

I. Statement of Facts At approximately 9:14 p.m. on November 6, 2012, officers were on routine patrol near a house where parolees lived and drug activity occurred. Th e officers observed atruck parked in front of the house. A reco rds check revealed that the truck had been reported stolen five days ear lier. The officers conducted su rveillance until three people, including defendant, exited the house and ente red the truck. The officers initiated a felony stop on the truck and ordered the occupa nts out of the truck. Defendant exited the truck. After he took a few steps, the offi cer ordered him to stop. Defendant, however, ran across the light rail tracks and into oncomi ng traffic. Officers and a K-9 unit pursued him and defendant was eventually apprehended. After conducting a search of his person, an officer found marijuana. Since defendant was the driver of the stolen truck and he matched the description of the individual who was seen stealing the truck, he was arrested. During his interview with the officers at the county jail, defendant stated that he ran from them because he was in possession of marijuana and in viol ation of probation.

He also stated that he borrowed the truck from a friend.

II. Discussion Appointed appellate counsel has filed an opening brief which states the case and

the facts but raises no issues. Defendant was notified of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf but has failed to avail himself of the op portunity. Pursuant

to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we have re viewed the entire record and have

concluded that there are no arguable issues on appeal.

III. Disposition The judgment is affirmed._______ ____________ __________ Mihara, J.

WE CONCUR:

________________ ______________ Elia, Acting P. J.

________________ ______________ Grover, J.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Nos. 333-116691, 333-14373, 333-25973, 333-62631,333-34200, 333-61688, 333-64892, 333-102444 and 333-106197)of North American Scientific, Inc. of our report dated February 25,2005 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule,which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

LosAngeles, California

January 16, 2006

----
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge that:





(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated: August 4, 2010

/s/ Katherine A. OstruszkaKatherine A. OstruszkaChief Financial Officer & Controller

(Principal Financial Officer)