alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2297 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Neopentyl Glycol 

Copolymers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Neopentyl 

Glycol Copolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPROLACTONE-NEOPENTYL GLYCOL COPOLY4 MERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Caprolactone-neopentylglycol 

copolymer (CAS No. 69089– 

45–8) (provided for in subheading 3907.99.01) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2297 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6826

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MIRWAISS AMINZADA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior 

District Judge. (1:13-cr-00130-CMH-10; 1:15-cv-00825-CMH)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mirwaiss Aminzada, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Elyse Marziani, 

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mirwaiss Aminzada seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Aminzada has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 
3

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David O'Neill, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Electronic Recovery Corp.., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Electronic Recovery Corp.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

1. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

Page 1







5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 20, 2006

/s/ David O'Neill	David O'Neill
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Page 2
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SHINE MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




SHINE
                MEDIA ACQUISITION CORP.





Date:May
                17, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                David Y. ChenDavid
                Y. ChenChief
                Executive Officer/S/
                Hock S. OngHock
                S. Ong
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      21, 2010
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-10T22:44:40Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-10T22:44:41Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-10T22:44:41Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="14907">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-10T22:44:40Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>-/ 0 62 19 / </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
EXHIBIT
32-2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC California Housing Tax
Credits, L.P. (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Chief Financial Officer of
WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R.
WENK




Melanie
R. Wenk


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.




Date:
June 29, 2010
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 12.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Mark Oleksiw, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of DRAXIS Health Inc.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

     4.   The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure conrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c.   disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or
persons performing equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  May 14, 2004                  By:   /s/ Mark Oleksiw
     -----------------------             ---------------------------------------
                                           Mark Oleksiw
                                           Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York,, Respondent, v Michael Hilliard, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sherman, J.), rendered May 24, 1989, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree (two counts), and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that reversal of his conviction is *560required because the trial court failed to impose a sanction for the People’s violation of *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286) is unpreserved for this court’s review, as the defendant neither objected thereto nor requested sanctions as a remedy *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Best,*145 AD2d 499; *see also, People v Mathews,*173 AD2d 565 [decided herewith]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Eiber and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
# L_2006364DE.01009202.xml

| 20.12.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 364/92 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 364/92

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2006/65/EG der Kommission vom 19. Juli 2006 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 76/768/EWG des Rates über kosmetische Mittel zwecks Anpassung der Anhänge II und III an den technischen Fortschritt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 198 vom 20. Juli 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 198 vom 20. Juli 2006

Seite 13, laufende Nummer 1228:

anstatt:

„Naphthalin-2,3-diol bei Verwendung als Stoff in Haarfärbemitteln“

muss es heißen:

„Naphthalin-1,7-diol bei Verwendung als Stoff in Haarfärbemitteln“.

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00216-CR

____________________

AARON EDWARD DOWDEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court 

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-08872 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

In this appeal, Aaron Edward Dowden’s court-appointed counsel filed a 

brief contending no arguable grounds can be advanced to support reversing 

Dowden’s felony conviction of driving while intoxicated. Based on our review of 

the record, we agree with Dowden’s counsel that no arguable issues exist that 

would support a decision to reverse the judgment being appealed. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2

After pleading guilty, Dowden was found guilty of driving while 

intoxicated, a third-degree felony, sentenced to three years in prison, and assessed 

a $500 fine. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp.

2014).1 However, the trial court suspended Dowden’s sentence and placed him on 

probation for three years. Approximately two years later, the State filed a motion 

asking the trial court to revoke its decision placing Dowden on probation. During 

the hearing on the State’s motion, Dowden pled “true” to violating several of the 

terms of the order governing his probation. Based on its findings that Dowden

violated the order that governed the terms of his probation, the trial court revoked 

its order of probation, and assessed a sentence requiring that Dowden be 

imprisoned for three years, noting the credits to which he was entitled for the time 

that he had already served. 

On appeal, Dowden’s counsel filed a brief presenting counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record; in the brief, Dowden’s counsel concludes that Dowden’s 

appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1978). We granted an extension of time to allow Dowden to file

a pro se brief. Dowden has not filed a response. 

 1

We cite to the current version of the statutes because the subsequent 

amendments do not affect the outcome of this appeal.
3

After reviewing the appellate record and the Anders brief filed by Dowden’s

counsel, we agree with counsel’s conclusion that any appeal would be frivolous. 

Therefore, we need not order the appointment of new counsel to re-brief Dowden’s 

appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 

Because no arguable issues support Dowden’s appeal, we affirm the trial court’s 

judgment.2

AFFIRMED.

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON

 Justice

 

Submitted on January 5, 2015

Opinion Delivered March 25, 2015

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

 2

Dowden may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**
**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.333-08437 and 333-98819 of Vodavi Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8of our report dated February 14, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (i) the adoption of anew accounting principle and (ii) the application of procedures relating tocertain other disclosures related to the 2000 consolidated financial statementsthat were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which wehave expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect tosuch disclosures), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of VodaviTechnology, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2003.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
<PAGE>

                                                  THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), I, Joseph K. Wilsted, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 5, 2006


/s/ Joseph K. Wilsted
-------------------------------------
Joseph K. Wilsted
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer


                                       36
**Exhibit 23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Nos.
      333-116691, 333-14373, 333-25973, 333-62631, 333-34200, 333-61688, 333-64892,
      333-102444, and 333-106197) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-135945) on Form S-3 of
      North American Scientific, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2008, relating
      to our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the financial
      statement schedules which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of North
      American Scientific, Inc. for the year ended October 31, 2007.




/s/
      SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP


Los
      Angeles, California




January
      25, 2008
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-24-00211-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.W., A CHILD §

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 360th District Court

of Tarrant County (360-727120-22)

September 26, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s termination order. It is ordered that the termination 

order of the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Rudolph JACKSON, Jr.

No. 88-KK-0034.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 5, 1988.

In re Jackson, Rudolph Jr.; applying for writ of review, supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “H”, No. 136-981; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 19642-KW.

Granted. Remanded to Court of Appeal to rule on whether state must answer regardless of title of motion.