alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                  THE GREENBRIER COMPANIES, INC.

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly report of The Greenbrier Companies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified
(the "Report"), I, William A. Furman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date April 5, 2006


/s/ William A. Furman
-------------------------------------
William A. Furman
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       35
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11

                             Blue Wave Systems Inc.

                   Computation of Per Share Net Income (Loss)

                For the Years Ended June 30, 2000, 1999 and 1998
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         2000       1999        1998
                                                                                      --------   --------    ---------
<S>                                                                                   <C>        <C>         <C>
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
     Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                                     $  2,837   $ (2,023)   $ (11,454)
                                                                                      ========   ========    =========

     Weighted average shares outstanding                                                14,804     13,076       12,684

Basic net income (loss) per share                                                       $ 0.19   $  (0.15)   $   (0.90)
                                                                                      ========   ========    =========

Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
     Total weighted average shares from above                                           14,804     13,076       12,684

     Weighted average of options and warrants outstanding                                  929        N/A          N/A
     Weighted average exercised options and warrants outstanding for portion
        of period, net of equivalent shares purchased at average fair market value         406        N/A          N/A
     Effect of using option proceeds to repurchase common stock at average
       fair market value                                                                  (203)       N/A          N/A
                                                                                      --------   --------    ---------
                      Other dilutive securities                                          1,132         --           --
                                                                                      --------   --------    ---------
     Weighted average diluted shares outstanding                                        15,936     13,076       12,684
                                                                                      --------   --------    ---------

Net income (loss)                                                                     $  2,837   $ (2,023)   $ (11,454)
                                                                                      ========   ========    =========

Diluted net income (loss) per share                                                   $   0.18   $  (0.15)   $   (0.90)
                                                                                      ========   ========    =========
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

           Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm" in the Statement of Additional Information
and the incorporation by reference therein and to the use of our report dated
February 27, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IDS
Life Insurance Company (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Life
Insurance Company) and to the use of our report dated March 31, 2006 with
respect to the financial statements of American Enterprise Variable Annuity
Account (name subsequently changed to RiverSource Variable Annuity Account) in
the Initial Registration Statement on Form N-4 for the registration of the
Evergreen Essential(SM) Variable Annuity offered by RiverSource Life Insurance
Company.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 2, 2007
**GRAN~DUCH~DELUXEMBOURG ~-~-**  DIRECTION DE L' AVIATION CIVILE Reference : 2014 - 38786 P:/ Legislat ion I Accords aeriens I USA Correspondant: Mr. Marc RAUS Tel : ( +352 ) 247 74946 e-mail : marc . raus@av . eta t.lu Y/ ref:

L uxembourg , 20 AOUT 2014 OFFICE OF I NTERNATIONAL AVIATION- US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AT ION c/o. Mr. Paul GRETCH Di rector1200 New Jersey Avenue SE WASHINGTON DC 20590 Subject : Charter Operations between the Grand-Duchy of Lu x embourg and the United States of Amer i ca Att. :Dear Mr. Gretch , This letter is to confirm that the Luxembourg Government , on the basis of reciprocity , will app r ove requests from US-designated airlines to perform fifth , sixth and seventh freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US Government will approve similar requests from Luxembourg-designated airlines. Yours sincerely , Post address Office address Telephone Fax Website e-mail Boite postale 283 4, rue Lou Hemmer ( +352 ) 247 74900 ( +352 ) 46 77 90 www . dac .lu civila i r@av . etat.lu L-2012 Luxembourg L-1748 Luxembou rg
<PAGE>   1
TYPE: EX-12.1
DESCRIPTION: STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                AEARO CORPORATION
                CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           Year Ended September 30.
                                                 1996              1997               1998               1999              2000
                                                 ----              ----               ----               ----              ----
<S>                                            <C>               <C>                <C>                <C>               <C>
EARNINGS:
Pre tax income (loss) from continuing
operations ...............................     $  6,477          $ (5,959)          $ (9,242)          $ 10,297          $ 12,624
Fixed Charges ............................       22,153            28,419             27,984             26,152            26,497
                                               --------          --------           --------           --------          --------
Earnings as defined ......................     $ 28,630          $ 22,460           $ 18,742           $ 36,449          $ 39,121
                                               --------          --------           --------           --------          --------

FIXED CHARGE:
Interest Expense, net ....................     $ 20,703          $ 26,665           $ 26,152           $ 24,322          $ 24,387
Interest component of operating lease.....        1,450             1,754              1,832              1,830             2,110
                                               --------          --------           --------           --------          --------
Fixed charges as defined .................     $ 22,153          $ 28,419           $ 27,984           $ 26,152          $ 26,497
                                               --------          --------           --------           --------          --------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges .......          1.3                --                 --                1.4               1.5
                                               ========          ========           ========           ========          ========
</TABLE>


Note:    Ratio of earnings to fixed charges is defined
         pre-tax income from continuing operations
         plus fixed charges divided by fixed charges.
         Fixed charges include interest (including
         amortization of debt issuance costs) and a
         portion of rental expense assumed to
         represent interest.  Earnings for the years
         ended September 30, 1997 and 1998 were
         insufficient to cover fixed charges by $6.0
         million and $9.2 million, respectively.
Filed 1/22/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2002 ND 15

In The Matter of The Application For Disciplinary Action Against Myron Tessmann, Judge of Burlington, North Dakota Municipal Court

Judicial Conduct Commission of

the State of North Dakota,                                                Petitioner

          v.

The Honorable Myron Tessmann,

Judge of the Municipal Court,                          

Burlington, North Dakota,                                       Respondent 

No. 20020009

CENSURE ORDERED.

PER CURIAM.

[¶1]This is a disciplinary proceeding against Myron Tessman who was serving as a municipal court judge in Burlington, North Dakota, at the commencement of formal proceedings.  Tessman has since resigned his position.

[¶2]On January 8, 2002, under Rule 14, Rules of the Judicial Conduct Commission, a Hearing Panel of the Judicial Conduct Commission submitted an Agreement signed by Paul W. Jacobson, Disciplinary Counsel, and Tessman, and an Affidavit of Consent signed by Tessman. 

[¶3]In the Affidavit, Tessman admitted to presiding over municipal court while smelling of an alcoholic beverage on a number of occasions, including, on or about November 9, 1999, July 3, 2001, July 17, 2001, and September 25, 2001.  Tessman further admitted his conduct violated Canon 2, North Dakota Code of Judicial Conduct, which provides “A Judge Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All of the Judge’s Activities”.  Additionally, Tessman agreed to a sanction of censure by the Supreme Court and the limitation of not serving in the future as a municipal judge.  The Hearing Panel accepted the Agreement and Tessman’s Affidavit.

[¶4]Under R. Jud. Conduct Comm. 14(C), the respondent is required to sign an Affidavit indicating the respondent consents to the sanction, the consent is freely and voluntarily rendered, there is presently pending a proceeding involving allegations of misconduct, and the facts set forth in the affidavit are true.  The Affidavit filed by Tessman meets these requirements.  Under R. Jud. Conduct Comm. 14(D), the Supreme Court must either reject the agreement or enter the order disciplining the respondent.

[¶5]ORDERED, the Agreement signed by Disciplinary Counsel and Myron Tessman and the Affidavit of Tessman are accepted; and 

[¶6]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, Myron Tessman is censured for his violation of N.D. Code Jud. Conduct Canon 2, and is prohibited from serving as a municipal judge.

[¶7]Dated at Bismarck, North Dakota, January 16, 2002.

[¶8]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Mary Muehlen Maring

William A. Neumann

Dale V. Sandstrom
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 14, 2015

No. 04-15-00427-CV

CRAWFORD MEDICAL SUPPLIES, LLC, Sam Maddali, Prem Swaroop Kalidindi, and 

Maddali Realty, LLC,

Appellants

v.

HUNTLEIGH HOME MEDICAL, LTD. and Jane Elizabeth Flores,

Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-00404

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. 

The appellee’s brief is due on September 26, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 12
                       UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                       -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                          1998          1997        1996         1995         1994
                                                                       ---------       ------      ------        ------      ------ 

<S>                                                                    <C>             <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>   
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes.......         ($1,488.3)      $418.9      $366.1        $368.3      $471.0

Add (deduct) distributions greater (to extent less) than
     income of unconsolidated affiliates......................              (5.8)        (3.8)       (4.2)          2.3        (5.4)

Fixed charges from below......................................             262.3         49.0        45.9          17.8         9.3

Capitalized interest included in fixed charges................              (0.9)        (2.0)         --          (0.8)       (0.7)
                                                                       ---------       ------      ------        ------      ------ 

         Earnings available for fixed charges.................         ($1,232.7)      $462.1      $407.8        $387.6      $474.2 
                                                                       =========       ======      ======        ======      ====== 

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense.........................................          $  249.8       $ 39.5      $ 38.9        $  9.5      $  2.3
     Portion of rentals representing an interest factor.......              11.6          7.5         7.0           7.5         6.3
     Interest capitalized.....................................               0.9          2.0          --           0.8         0.7
                                                                       ---------       ------      ------        ------      ------ 

         Total fixed charges..................................          $  262.3       $ 49.0      $ 45.9        $ 17.8      $  9.3
                                                                       =========       ======      ======        ======      ====== 

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges............................              (4.7)         9.4         8.9          21.8        51.0
                                                                       =========       ======      ======        ======      ====== 
</TABLE>

For the year ended December 31, 1998, earnings are insufficient by $1,495
million to cover fixed charges.
#### IN RE ROBERT T.

*Francis A. Miniter,*in support of the petition.

*Bruce R. Lockwood,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The respondent Robert T.’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 17929) is denied.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Gregory K. Roeper, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information ;and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:     March 29, 2006           /s/ Gregory K. Roeper     Gregory K. Roeper    Chief Executive Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gladys Hernandez, * From the 385th District

 Court of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CV47188

Vs. No. 11-11-00182-CV * July 18, 2013

Select Medical Corporation and Select * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

Specialty Hospital-Midland, Inc., (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error 

in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the order of 

the trial court is modified to provide that all costs are taxed against Gladys Hernandez. 

As modified, we affirm the order of the trial court. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Gladys Hernandez.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mystica Candle Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jon Suk, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of May, 2007.


/s/ Jon Suk
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2040 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2040

           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2 HEXANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       1,2 Hexanediol      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 6920-22-                                                  31/2011.......
                          5) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2209 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ion exchange resin powder 

comprised of a certain copolymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ion exchange 

resin powder comprised of a certain copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN POWDER COMPRISED OF 

4 A CERTAIN COPOLYMER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.79 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 ion exchange resin powder comprised of a certain copoly8 mer) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2209 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS