alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Katherine A Ostruszka, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.







Date:  November
      12, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Katherine A
      OstruszkaKatherine
      A Ostruszka
              Chief
      Financial Officer & Controller
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 12.1

Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                                    |  |                        |  | For the Years Ended December 31, |        
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -------
|                                                    |  |                        |  | 2005                             |        
|                                                    |  | (dollars in thousands) | 
|                                                   
|Income before taxes                                 |  |                        |  | $                                | 110,531
|Add:fixed charges                                   |  |                        |  |                                  | 134,831
|                                                   
|Earnings including interest expense - deposits      |  | (a)                    |  |                                  | 245,362
|Less:interest expense - deposits                    |  |                        |  |                                  | (87,112
|                                                   
|Earnings excluding interest expenses - deposits     |  | (b)                    |  | $                                | 158,250
|                                                   
|Fixed Charges:                                      |  |                        |  |                                  |        
|Interest expense - deposits                         |  |                        |  | $                                | 87,112 
|Interest expense - borrowings                       |  |                        |  |                                  | 47,719 
|                                                   
|Fixed charges including interest expense - deposits |  | (c)                    |  |                                  | 134,831
|Less:interest expense - deposits                    |  |                        |  |                                  | (87,112
|                                                   
|Fixed charges excluding interest expense - deposits |  | (d)                    |  | $                                | 47,719 
|                                                   
|Earnings to fixed charges:                          |  |                        |  |                                  |        
|Excluding interest on deposits                      |  | ((b) / (d))            |  |                                  | 1.82   
|Including interest on deposits                      |  | ((a) / (c))            |  |                                  | 3.32   











---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6350
JOHN PAUL TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SUPERINTENDENT OF ROCKRIDGE REGIONAL JAIL, Augusta County Sheriff, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-03-761-7-SGW) Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: September 6, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: John Paul Turner appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying Turner’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion for consolidation is denied.
DISMISSED
#### C. Ferlita, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. S. Jones, Chief of Police, City of Tampa, Defendant in Error.

When a municipal ordinance is not before the court, its invalidity cannot be adjudged.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

*T. E. Lucas*and *Gunby &*Gibbons, for Plaintiff in Error.

*C. G. Whitaker*and *W. 3.*Ellis, Attorney-General, for Defendant in Error.

Per Curiam.

This is a writ of error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Hillsborough county, remanding to custody the petitioner in a *habeas corpus*proceeding, instituted to test the validity of a conviction in the municipal court of Tampa, under an ordinance alleged to be in contravention of the Federal Constitution.

The transcript of the record, however, does not present the ordinance for our inspection and it is therefore made impossible for us to determine affirmatively that error has been committed, the judgment must be affirmed. See Freeman v. State, 19 Fla. 552.

Shackleford, C. J., and Cockrell and Whitfield, JJ., concur.

Taylor, P. J., and Hocker and Parkhill, JJ., concur in the opinion.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus LAFAYETTE MCKOY, a/k/a L.A., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:99-cr-00526-WMN-8; 1:06-cv-01036-WMN) Submitted: June 21, 2007 Decided: June 27, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lafayette McKoy, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Clarke, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lafayette McKoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKoy , No. 1:99-cr-00526-WMN-8; 1:06-cv-01036-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

             STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The following table details the number of shares used in computing primary and
fully diluted earnings per share:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 1996                1995
                                                 ----                ----
<S>                                      <C>                <C>
Primary:
  Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                               7,223,506            4,753,999

  Effect of shares issuable under
   stock option and stock grant
   plans, based on the treasury
   stock method                                819,223              325,290

  Effect of shares issuable under
   conversion of preferred stock                90,548            1,290,383
                                                ------            ---------

                                             8,133,277            6,369,672
                                             =========            =========

  Earnings                                  $  834,921           $  520,153
  Earnings per share                              $.10                 $.08

Fully diluted:
  Weighted average common shares
   outstanding                               7,223,506            4,753,999

  Effect of shares issuable under
   stock option and stock grant
   plans, based on the treasury
   stock method                                892,326              598,191

  Effect of shares issuable under
   conversion of preferred stock                90,548            1,290,383
                                                ------            ---------

                                             8,206,380            6,642,573
                                             =========            =========

  Earnings                                  $  834,921           $  520,153
  Earnings per share                              $.10                 $.08

</TABLE>


Fully diluted earnings per share does not include the effect of shares
issuable under conversion of the convertible notes as such effect is
antidilutive. The weighted average common shares outstanding includes
2,300,000 shares of common stock issued on December 18, 1996 upon the
conversion of the convertible notes.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

Exhibit No.27.3  Financial Data Schedule (Year Ended December 31, 1996)

<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27.3
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SYSTEMS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE FISCAL PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                               61,039
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       932,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (28,074)
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,403,881
<PP&E>                                            1,812,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (587,598)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,847,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,908,138
<BONDS>                                           3,180,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       2,492,375
<COMMON>                                             10,627
<OTHER-SE>                                       (6,480,452)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,847,300
<SALES>                                           2,832,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,832,123
<CGS>                                               827,063
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    22,843,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    103,891
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  381,975
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (20,488,639)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (2,554,150)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (17,934,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  ( 1,322,179)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (19,256,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (2.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


        

</TABLE>
## APPENDIX 12B. MANUFACT URER IMPACT ANALYSIS SMALL BUSINESS INTERVIEW GUIDE
TABLE OF CONTENTS

12B.1 MIA Interview Guide for Small Businesses 12B-1

12B
‐ i

### 12B.1 MIA Interview Guide for Small Businesses


## Distribution Transformer Energy Conservation Standards Rulemaking Manufacturer Impact Analysis Int erview Guide for Small Businesses 1. Are you aware of the US Department of Energy’s on-going rulemaking to establish national minimu m efficiency standards for distribution transformers? 1 Would you like to be added to the DOE’s email database for updates relating to this rulemaking? 2. We are assessing the potential impacts of a potential minimum efficiency standard on small business es. Is your company a small business (defined as less than 750 employees, including all subsidiaries and parent companies, and empl oyees in all countries where you operate)? 3. Does your company manufacture LV dry-type, MV dry-type, and/or liqui d-immersed distribution transformers? How many differen t kVA ratings and designs do you produce within these three major groupings? 4. Are you familiar with NEMA’s TP-1 / the E NERGY S TAR voluntary standard? Are any of your products TP-1 compliant? If so, what percent of your sales does this represent? 5. Would a TP-1 standard, mandated by the US DO E (wher eby all your competitors would also required to meet the same standard), cause any burdens on your business? 6. What if the US DOE required an efficiency standard higher than TP-1? Would that change your answer to #5? Please consider costs such as new designs, capital investment, prototype testing, and marketing that might be required. 7. Are there any reasons that a small business such as yours might be at a competitive disadvantage relative to a larger business under mandatory efficiency sta ndards? Please consider such factors as technical experti se, capital budgets, bulk purchasing power for material inputs (e.g., electrical steels), etc. 8. Would the Department’s proposed test pro cedure i mpose an undue burden on small business (explanation required)? 2 Please consider such factors as tec hnician time, statistical expertise, reporting burden, etc.

1 For information on the US DOE’s efficiency standa rds rulemaking for distribution transformers, visit: http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standa rds/commercial/distributi on_transformers_anopr.html 2 For information on the US DOE’s draft test procedure for distribution transformers, visit: http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standa rds/commercial/distributi on_transformers_snopr.html 12B
‐ 1
**Exhibit32.2**

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical ServicesCorporation, as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof:

(a)                  the Form 10-Q of the Company for thefiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(b)                 the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ William A. Sanger                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                                                                                |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                          |
|   | Emergency Medical  Services Corporation, as  general partner of Emergency Medical  Services L.P. |
|   | May 4, 2007                                                                                      |
|   |                                                                                             |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                                                                               |
|   | Randel G. Owen                                                                                   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                          |
|   | Emergency Medical  Services Corporation, as  general partner of Emergency Medical  Services L.P. |
|   | May 4, 2007                                                                                      |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 CERTIFICATION
  I, Robert
W. Duggan, certify that:
  1.           I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of
Pharmacyclics, Inc.;
  2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report.
  /s/
      Robert W. DugganRobert
      W. DugganChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerOctober
      27,
      2009
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 Certification
        of Principal Executive and Financial Officer
 Pursuant
        to
 Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
        31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Highbury Financial Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned
        hereby certify that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge:
  (1)         The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)         The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the
        period certified.
  Date:
                  May 2, 2007
              
              By:
              
              /s/
                  Richard S. Foote**Richard
                  S. Foote****President
                  and Chief Executive Officer****(Principal
                  Executive Officer)**By:
              
              /s/
                  R. Bradley Forth**R.
                  Bradley Forth****Executive
                  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
                  Secretary****(Principal
                  Financial Officer)**
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Glenn J. Heiar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Armor Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31,
2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Armor Holdings, Inc.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: May 10, 2004                             By: /s/ Glenn J. Heiar
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Glenn J. Heiar
                                                  Title: Chief Financial Officer