alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and loan holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 9, 2012.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Richard Walker, Community Affairs Officer) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204:

                    1.                     *Georgetown Bancorp, MHC,*                     Georgetown, Massachusetts; to convert to stock form and merge with Georgetown Bancorp. Inc., and to become a savings and loan holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Georgetown Savings Bank, both in Georgetown, Massachusetts.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 2012.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2012-6302 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
               ---------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-38765), the Registration Statement on Form S-4
(No. 333-38759), the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-70522), the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-71063), and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-44742) of Armor Holdings, Inc. of our report
dated March 30, 2003 relating to the consolidated financial statements and
consolidated financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Jacksonville, Florida
March 30, 2003
Exhibit
23(a)
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-1 (Registration No. 333-144201) and Form S-8 (Registration
Nos. 333-16939, 333-33276, 333-117057 and 333-151777) of our reports dated
March 13, 2009, relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008, which included an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company’s adoption of the Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities,”
and our audit of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc., included in the 2008 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
 
 We also
consent to the reference of our firm under the caption "Experts" on Form S-1
(Registration No. 333-144201), of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.
 
 
 /s/  Eisner
LLP
 New York,
New York
 March 13,
2009
#### STATE ex rel. Lloyd DESMOND v. STATE of Louisiana.

No. 87-KH-1191.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 13, 1987.

In re Desmond, Lloyd; applying for remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. KW 5715; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “D”, Nos. 287-091, 287-067 and 284-651.

Prior report: La., 502 So.2d 1093.

Granted. Trial court ordered to comply with this Court’s order of 3/13/87 and furnish Boykin transcript within 30 days.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-5255

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BURTON ARNOLD COKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (2:01-cr-00037)

Submitted: July 13, 2007 Decided: July 25, 2007 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Janna D. Allison, Waynesville, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Charlotte, North

Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Burton Arnold Coker appeals the district court’s order

revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to eight months’

imprisonment. Coker’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are

no meritorious issues for appeal, but suggesting that the district

court erred by revoking and sentencing Coker based on supervised

release violations. Coker has been informed of his right to file

a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. 

Pursuant to Anders, we have examined the entire record

and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Coker admitted to

violations of his supervised release, and we find his sentence was

reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

This court requires that counsel inform her client, in writing of

his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for

further review. If the client requests that such a petition be

filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to

withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a

copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| Group 1 - 84%                                                | Group 2- 16%                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  -Will deliver 60% of their shares of CHEM stock to CIL |  -Will deliver 60% of their shares of CHEM stock to CIL shares |
| -CI I, will deliver 42,000,000 CIL common shares to Group 1  | -CIL will deliver 8,000,000 CIL common shares to Group 2            |

|   Use of Proceeds(Assuming a raise of $220,000 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Start up of production in China for CSRV systems    |   | $ | 80,000,000 |   |
| U.S. Production by CIL of CSRV systems              |   |   | 80,000,000 |   |
| Cash paid to selling stockholders                   |   |   | 22,000,000 |   |
| Underwriting commissions @ 8%                       |   |   | 17,600,000 |   |
| Offering costs                                      |   |   | 3,000,000 |   |
| Costs of merger transaction                         |   |   | 2,000,000 |   |
| General working capital                             |   |   | 15,400,000 |   |
|    Total                             |   | $ | 220,000,000 |   |

| Estimated Use of Proceeds(Assuming a raise of $500,000                      |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Start up of production in China for CSRV systems                            |   | $ | 100,000,000 |   |
| U.S. Production by CIL of CSRV systems                                      |   |   | 100,000,000 |   |
| Research & Development of Exhaust Heat Exchanger                        |   |   | 10,000,000 |   |
| Other new projects such as racing and marine applications and compressors   |   |   | 100,000,000 |   |
| Cash paid to selling stockholders                                           |   |   | 22,000,000 |   |
| Underwriting commissions @ 8%                                               |   |   | 40,000,000 |   |
| Offering costs                                                              |   |   | 3,000,000 |   |
| Costs of merger transaction                                                 |   |   | 2,000,000 |   |
| General working capital and investments in short term high rated securities |   |   | 123,400,000 |   |
|    Total                                                     |   | $ | 500,000,000 |   |

| COATES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.   By: /s/ George J. Coates Name: George J. Coates Title: President and CEO  | CHINESE HEAVY EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER   By: /s/ President of CHEMName: President of CHEMTitle: President |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 53 (Monday, March 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 16027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6514]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER12-1223-000]


Wildcat Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Wildcat Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 2, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1979483929ebfbdb8bfb482a4a1a1bea3a591b7b4a3b2ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 13, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6514 Filed 3-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6


 





LIFESCI ACQUISITION II CORP.

250 W. 55th St., #3401

New York, NY 10019


 


November 20, 2020


 


LifeSci Capital LLC 


250 W. 55th St., #3401


New York, NY 10019


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of the securities of LifeSci Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing until the earlier of (i)
the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case as described
in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
LifeSci Capital LLC (“LC”) shall make available to the Company certain office space, secretarial and
administrative services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 250 W. 55th St., #3401, New York, NY 10019
(or any successor location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay LC a sum of $10,000 per month, respectively, on the Effective
Date and continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. LC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
that may be established by the Company for the benefit of the Company’s public stockholders upon the consummation of the
IPO as described in the Registration Statement ( “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have in
the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse
against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


	 	Very
    truly yours,
	 	 
	 	LIFESCI
    ACQUISITION II CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:
    	/s/
    Andrew McDonald
	 	Name:
    Andrew McDonald
	 	Title:
    Chief Executive Officer




 


	AGREED
    TO AND ACCEPTED BY:	 
	 	 
	LIFESCI
    CAPITAL LLC	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Andrew McDonald	 
	Name:
    Andrew McDonald	 
	Title:
    Chief Executive Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2411 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on reaction products of phosphorous trichloride with 1,1′-biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1- 

dimethylethyl)phenol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. HAGAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on reaction 

products of phosphorous trichloride with 1,1′-biphenyl 

and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTION PRODUCTS OF PHOSPHOROUS TRI4 CHLORIDE WITH 1,1′-BIPHENYL AND 2,4- 

5 BIS(1,1-DIMETHYLETHYL)PHENOL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.04.07 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 reaction products of phosphorous trichloride with 1,1′- 

9 biphenyl and 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol) is amended 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2411 IS

1 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

2 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 3964

_____________________________
T HOMAS M. P ALMER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark
, Jr., Judge

. August 21, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and M AKAR and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P . 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Thomas M. Palmer, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### M.A. SCHOFMAN, Ramon C. Sanchez, and Cayetano A. Midolo, Appellants, v. Gaston De CARDENAS, Gustavo De Ribeaux, E. Allan Hathaway, Gabriel Diaz Bergnez, and Francisco Mestre, Jr., Appellees.

No. 86-1770.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

Craig R. Dearr, Hialeah, and Aurelio Du-rana, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene and Ar-naldo Velez, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of appellees. Because the record on appeal reveals that there are issues of material fact which have not been eliminated by the movants for summary judgment, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.
#### Debra Ann PIAZZA, Appellant, v. Charles Anthony PIAZZA, Appellee.

No. 87-2361.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 13, 1988.

Philip J. Montante, Jr., of Philip J. Mon-tante, Jr., P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Charles Anthony Piazza, Pompano Beach, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order of modification and remand with direction to restore primary residential responsibility of the mother. The record does not support the trial court’s bare assertion of a substantial change of circumstances. *See Haines v. Haines,*417 So.2d 819, 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

HERSEY, C.J., and LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.
#### Clarine EDWARDS, Plaintiff, v. Jack O. TILLERY, the Industrial Commission, and the State Insurance Fund, Defendants.

No. 19047.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Sept. 30, 1983.

Robert J. DeBry, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Stephen Hadley, James R. Black, Salt Lake City, for defendants.

PER CURIAM:

This is a review of the denial of a claim for compensation under the Workmen’s *196Compensation Act.1 The plaintiff claimed injury from smoke inhalation from a fire in the restaurant where she was employed. The medical panel reported there was no causal relationship between the inhalation and her alleged injury. Plaintiff seeks reversal of the denial of her claim, alleging that one member of the medical panel .was not qualified.2

The physician whose expertise is questioned is a reputable internist who specialized for over 20 years in the occupational disease involved in the plaintiffs claim. During that time and thereafter, the physician served as professor at the University of Utah medical college. It is unrefuted that his capabilities extended to the sub-specialty known as “pulmonary disease.”

The claim of disqualification rests only on the fact that the physician had left active practice and that he therefore no longer “treated” patients under the statutory terminology employed. The doctor had changed his line of endeavor in order to represent businesses and to pursue teaching. In every respect he was concerned with, advised as to, and taught the proper “treatment of the disease or condition involved,” as stated in the statüte.

The plaintiff’s attempted denigration of the doctor’s professionalism so as to render suspect the Commission’s order is without substance. We need not search the statute in this case to arrive at legislative intent, since under the clear language thereof the physician is qualified. He was “specializing in the treatment of the disease,” irrespective of the question of treating patients on an individual appointment basis.

The order denying compensation is affirmed.

1

. U.C.A., 1953, § 35-1-1, *et seq.*

2

. U.C.A., 1953, § 35-1-77 deals generally with the “qualifications,” and U.C.A., 1953, § 35-2-56 calls for a physician “specially trained” who is “specializing in the treatment of the disease or condition involved.”
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24
- 0367 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SANCHA MARIE VALENZUELA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 16 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 12 2024

09/12/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0367
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2004 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic staple fiber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic 

staple fiber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBER 

4 NOT CARDED OR COMBED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2004 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fiber dyed 

(polyacrylonitrile staple), not 

carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning, containing by weight a minimum 

of 92% polyacrylonitrile, not 

more than .01 percent zinc 

and from 2 to 8 percent 

water, imported in the form 

of staple fiber with a filament 

decitex of 4.0 decitex to 6.7 

decitex (plus or minus 10 

percent) with a fiber shrinkage of 0 to 22 percent (plus 

or minus 10 percent) and a 

cut fiber length of 89 to 140 

with a target length of 115 

mm (provided for in subheading 5503.30.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS