alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of By Design, Inc. (the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I. Deanie J. Underwood, Chief Executive and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Dated:
May 16, 2008


By:
              /s/ Deanie
      J. UnderwoodDeanie
      J. Underwood
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.2

TELEWEST COMMUNICATIONS PLC

TELEWEST GLOBAL, INC

TELEWEST UK LIMITED

---

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

---

---



CONTENTS

|CLAUSE                                  |  | PAGE
|--------------------------------------- |  | ----
|1. INTERPRETATION                       |  | 1   
|2. AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT |  | 2   
|3. CONFIRMATION                         |  | 3   
|4. MISCELLANEOUS                        |  | 3   
|5. COUNTERPARTS                         |  | 3   
|6. GOVERNING LAW                        |  | 3   

---



THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO THE TRANSFER AGREEMENTis made on 19 May 2005

BETWEEN:



WHEREAS:



THIS DEED PROVIDES

1.     INTERPRETATION

1

---



2.     AMENDMENTS TO THE TRANSFER AGREEMENT

With effect from the date of this Amendment Agreement, the Transfer Agreement shall be amended as follows:

"8.3
Telewest UK hereby irrevocably directs the Vendor, and the Vendor hereby acknowledges such direction, to apply the Expenses Fund held by it pursuant to clause 8.2 above as follows:



2

---





"8.6
For the avoidance of doubt, Telewest UK may be paid, and the Vendor undertakes to pay, the sum due in accordance with clause 8.3(e) above before payment has been made in respect of all
sums directed to be paid under clause 8.3(a) to (d) above. Telewest UK will be paid, and the Vendor undertakes to pay, a distribution of any amounts remaining in the Designated Account
in accordance with clause 8.3(f) above only after payment has been made in respect of all sums directed to be paid under clause 8.3(a) to (e) above.

3.     CONFIRMATION

4.     MISCELLANEOUS

5.     COUNTERPARTS

This Amendment Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the parties to it on separate counterparts, each of which is an original but all of
which together constitute one and the same instrument.

6.     GOVERNING LAW

This Amendment Agreement shall be governed by, and shall be construed in accordance with English law.

3

---



IN WITNESS WHEREOFthis Agreement has been executed and delivered as a deed by the parties hereto the day and year first before written.

|EXECUTEDas aDEEDby                             |  | ) |  | 
|---------------------------------------------- |  | - |  | 
|TELEWEST COMMUNICATIONS PLC                    |  | ) |  | 
|acting by two directors                        |  | ) |  | 
|a director and the secretary                   |  | ) |  | 
|SIGNEDas aDEED                                 |  | ) |  | 
|on behalf ofTELEWEST GLOBAL, INC.,             |  | ) |  | 
|a company organised under the laws of Delaware |  | ) |  | 
|by a duly authorised signatory who,            |  | ) |  | 
|in accordance with the laws of that territory, |  | ) |  | 
|is acting under the authority of               |  | ) |  | 
|TELEWEST GLOBAL, INC.                          |  | ) |  | 
|EXECUTEDas aDEEDby                             |  | ) |  | 
|TELEWEST UK LIMITED                            |  | ) |  | 
|acting by two directors/                       |  | ) |  | 
|a director and the secretary                   |  | ) |  | 

4

---



QuickLinks
**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

|                                |                                                            |                                                |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Dated:              August 16, 2006 |                                                       | /s/ Alan              H.              Auerbach |
|                                | Alan              H. Auerbach                                   |
|                                | President              and              Chief Executive Officer |

|                                |                          |                                   |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Dated:              August 16, 2006 |                     | /s/ Charles              R. Eyler |
|                                | Charles              R. Eyler |
|                                | Treasurer                     |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78911-78912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30415]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

U.S. Copyright Office

[Docket No. 2014-5]

The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices

AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Register of Copyrights releases the Compendium of U.S. 
Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office (the ``Office'') is announcing the 
release of its administrative manual, the Compendium of U.S. Copyright 
Office Practices, Third Edition (the ``Third Edition''). It is 
available on the Office's Web site and is effective as of December 22, 
2014.

DATES: The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition 
is available on the Office's Web site as of December 22, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Kasunic, Associate Register and 
Director of Registration Policy and Practice, U.S. Copyright Office, 
P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024-0400. Telephone (202) 707-8040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office 
Practices is the administrative manual of the Register of Copyrights 
concerning the mandate and statutory duties of the Copyright Office 
under title 17 of the United States Code. It serves as both a technical 
manual for the Office's staff, as well as a guidebook for authors, 
copyright licensees, practitioners,

[[Page 78912]]

scholars, the courts, and members of the general public.
    On August 20, 2014 the Office released a public draft of this 
manual titled, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third 
Edition. 79 FR 49343. The first major revision in more than two 
decades, the Third Edition is a comprehensive overhaul that makes the 
practices and standards of the Office more accessible and transparent 
to the public and sets the stage for a number of long-term improvements 
in registration and recordation policy.
    The Office is now announcing the release of the official version of 
the Third Edition. It is available on the Office's Web site at http://copyright.gov/comp3/. The Third Edition is effective as of December 22, 
2014 and is the governing administrative manual for registrations and 
recordations issued by the Office on or after that date.

    Dated: December 19, 2014.
Robert Kasunic,
Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of the Office of 
Registration Policy and Practice.
[FR Doc. 2014-30415 Filed 12-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00300-CV

NO. 03-10-00301-CV

Mark A. Stolzer, Appellant

v.

Hector Gonzalez, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NOS. C-1-CV-09-011561 & C-1-CV-10-001893

HONORABLE ERIC SHEPPERD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Mark A. Stolzer has filed an unopposed motion asking this Court to

dismiss his appeal in accordance with the settlement agreement reached by the parties. We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

 

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 26, 2010
GMAC Commercial Holding Corp.

200 Witmer Road

Horsham, PA 19044

Tel. 215-328-4622

Fax: 215-328-1316

GMAC

.	**Commercial Holding Corp.**
 
**Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance with Minimum Master Servicing Standards

 

March 13, 2002

 

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, GMAC Commercial Mortgage Corp., and its subsidiaries, have complied in all material respects with the master servicing standards set forth in the Company's master servicing standards (attached), which were derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.
The Company, as master servicer, performs certain functions with respect to servicing

loans, however, the direct loan servicing functions are performed by various subservicers.

For those loans included in the Pooling and Servicing Agreements listed in the attached

Exhibit A, the Company has complied with their Master Servicing Standards enumerated

below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001.

David E Creamer, President and CEO

 

 
***Wayne D. Hoch*
Wayne D. Hoch, Executive Vice President and CFO
***Michael Lipson*
Michael Lipson,

Executive Vice President

 ******
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 231

   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 14, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Whitehouse, 
    Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Boxer, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Wyden, Mr. 
 Reed, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, Mr. Udall 
of Colorado, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Kerry, Ms. Klobuchar, and 
 Mr. Menendez) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as 
                              wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PORTION OF ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE AS 
              WILDERNESS.

    Section 4 of the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act 
of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(p) Designation of Certain Land as Wilderness.--Notwithstanding 
any other provision of this Act, a portion of the Arctic National 
Wildlife Refuge in Alaska comprising approximately 1,559,538 acres, as 
generally depicted on a map entitled `Arctic National Wildlife Refuge--
1002 Area. Alternative E--Wilderness Designation, October 28, 1991' and 
available for inspection in the offices of the Secretary, is designated 
as a component of the National Wilderness Preservation System under the 
Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1131 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The STATE BOND COMMISSION OF the STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ALL TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND CITIZENS OF the STATE OF LOUISIANA and Non-Residents Owning Property or Subject to Taxation Therein, and All Other Persons Interested in or Affected in Any Way by the Issuance of Revenue Anticipation Notes of the State of Louisiana.

No. 88-CD-0884.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 14, 1988.

In re State Bond Commission of the State of Louisiana and Camille F. Gravel, Jr., etc., applying for writs of certiorari (review), prohibition, mandamus and supervisory and/or remeidal writs; 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 329278, Div. “G”.

Granted.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2335 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on basketballs other than leather 

or rubber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. KIRK, Mr. BUNNING, and Mr. ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary reduction of duty on basketballs 

other than leather or rubber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BASKETBALLS OTHER THAN LEATHER OR RUB4 BER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.07 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 basketballs other than leather or rubber) is amended by 

8 striking the date in the effective period column and insert9 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2335 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2297 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2297

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Neopentyl Glycol 
                              Copolymers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Neopentyl Glycol 
                              Copolymers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPROLACTONE-NEOPENTYL GLYCOL COPOLYMERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Caprolactone-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        neopentylglycol                                                    31/2011.......
                        copolymer (CAS
                        No. 69089-45-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 51 (Thursday, March 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6284]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--National Warheads and Energetics Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 23, 2012, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), National Warheads and 
Energetics Consortium (``NWEC'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Cartridge Actuated Devices, Inc., 
Fairfield, NJ; Electronic Warfare Associates, Inc., Herndon, VA; Gomez 
Research Associates, Inc., Huntsville, AL; Custom Analytical 
Engineering Systems, Inc., Flintstone, MD; Corvid Technologies, 
Mooresville, NC; Synepsys Technologies Inc., Clearwater, FL; Laserlith 
Corporation, Grand Forks, ND; Strategic Innovative Solutions, LLC, 
Ringwood, NJ; TORC Robotics, LLC, Blacksburg, VA; and Nova Training and 
Technology Solutions, LLC, Garnet Valley, PA, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    Also, The Curators of the University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, and 
United Support Solutions, Inc., Cedar Grove, NJ, have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and NWEC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 2, 2000, NWEC filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 30, 
2000 (65 FR 40693).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 4, 
2011. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 25, 2011 (76 FR 72724).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-6284 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*SERGIO VELASCO

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15881.

*Christina M. Carroll,*in support of the petition.

*Christopher T. Godialis,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided March 5, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 424 (AC 16466), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court had incorrectly suppressed evidence in this case under the totality of circumstances test as articulated in *State*v. *Barton,*219 Conn. 529 (1991)?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
USAA Federal Savings



# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00306

- CV

Cynthia L. BARKMAN and Charles N. Barkman,

Appellant s

v.

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK

,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CV01936 Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was due on August 5, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). On August 24, 2015, after neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time was timely filed, we ordered Appellants to show cause in writing by September 3, 2015, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a) , 42.3(b), (c). On September 4, 2015, Appellants filed a brief.

Appellants’ brief does not contain any citations to the record in either the statement of facts or argument sections. Contra id. R. 38.1(g) (“The statement [of facts] must be supported by record references.”) ; id. R. 38.1(i) (“ The brief must contain a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to authori ties and to the record. ”)

. Further, although it references certain documents as appendices, the brief contains no appendix. Contra

id. R. 38.1(k).

While substantial compliance with R ule 38 may be sufficient, this court may order a party to amend, supplement, or redraw a brief if it flagrantly violates R ule 38. See id. R. 38.9(a). We conclude that the formal defects described above constitute flagrant violations of R ule 38.

Th erefore, we STRIKE Appellant s ’ brief and ORDER A ppellant s Charles Barkm an and Cynthia L. Barkman to file an amended brief within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. The

amended brief must correct the violations listed above and fully comply with the applicable

rules. See, e.g.

, id. R. 9.4, 9.5, 38.1.If the amended brief does not comply with this order , we “ may strike the brief

, prohibit

[A ppellant s ] from filing another , and proceed as if [Appellant s ] had failed to file a brief.” See id.

R. 38.9(a); see also id. R. 38.8(a) (authorizing this court to dismiss an appeal if an appellant fails to timely file a brief).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 16th day of September , 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,337

EX PARTE ROGER DALE BRECHEEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 23302-A IN THE 42nd DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to forty-eight years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court has determined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find,

therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment
2

of conviction in Cause No. 23302-A from the 42nd Judicial District Court of Taylor County.

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated

as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold

that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written

notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: May 5, 2010

Do Not Publish