alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          57,750
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       231,813
<OTHER-SE>                                     (289,563)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               31,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (202,326)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (234,201)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.04)
        


</TABLE>
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on From 10-Q of Israel Growth Partners Acquisition Corp. (the
Registrant) for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Registrant.

|Dated: December 12, 2006 |  | /s/ Carmel Vernia
Carmel VerniaChief Executive Officer
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### Michael A. HILLMAN, et al v. UNITED STATES AVIATION UNDERWRITERS, et al.

No. 89-C-1188.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 30, 1989.

In re Aetna Casualty & Suty. Co.; — Others); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA87 1785; Parish of Iberville, 18th Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 30410.

Prior report: La.App., 542 So.2d 218.

Denied.

MARCUS and LEMMON, JJ., would grant the writ.
**Exhibit13.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OR EQUIVALENT**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,**

**CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of DRAXIS Health Inc., a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report of Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   | Dated: March 30, 2007 | /s/ MARK OLEKSIW        |
|--------|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|   |                  | Mark Oleksiw            |
|   |                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as separate disclosure document.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1928 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1928

   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on golf bag 
 bodies made of woven fabrics of nylon or polyester sewn together with 
    pockets, and dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied with 
                               rainhoods.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend and modify the temporary suspension of duty on golf bag 
 bodies made of woven fabrics of nylon or polyester sewn together with 
    pockets, and dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied with 
                               rainhoods.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GOLF BAG BODIES MADE OF WOVEN FABRICS OF NYLON OR POLYESTER 
              SEWN TOGETHER WITH POCKETS, AND DIVIDERS OR GRAPHITE 
              PROTECTORS, ACCOMPANIED WITH RAINHOODS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to golf bag bodies made of 
woven fabrics of nylon or polyester sewn together with pockets, and 
dividers or graphite protectors, accompanied with rainhoods) is 
amended--
            (1) by amending the article description to read as follows: 
        ``Golf bag bodies made of woven fabrics of nylon or polyester 
        sewn together with pockets, and dividers or graphite 
        protectors, accompanied with rainhoods''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.01

             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement Nos.
333-39613 and 33-48101 of Elantec Semiconductor,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated  October 22, 1998  (December  3, 1998 as to Note 10.),  appearing  in this
Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Elantec  Semiconductor,  Inc.  for the year ended
September 30, 1998.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
December 8, 1998


                                       51
#### Aaron J. EDMOND, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-2516.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 2, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Stephen Krosschell, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PARKER, Judge.

This case is controlled by the opinion filed on this date in *Edmond v. State,*521 So.2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). In the present case, Edmond was convicted of burglary and sexual battery, stemming from the events introduced as collateral crime evidence in case no. 86-2515. The sole issue dispositive of this appeal concerns the admissibility of evidence of a similar crime; the similar crime evidence introduced here was also the primary evidence leading to Edmond’s conviction in case no. 86-2515.

In accordance with our decision in case no. 86-2515, we reverse the judgment and sentences and remand for a new trial to be conducted without the admission of the collateral crime evidence.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-2587 

LT Case No. 2021-DP-039

_____________________________ 

T.K.T., SR., FATHER OF T.K.T., A

CHILD, 

Appellant, 

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County. 

Daniel B. Merritt, Sr., Judge. 

Amanda Peterson, of Law Offices Of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for 

Appellant. 

Rachel Batten, of Children’s Legal Services, Brooksville, for 

Appellee.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and 

Amanda Victoria Glass, Senior Attorney, of Statewide Guardian 

ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, and Khairiya C. Bryant, of KCB 

Law, PLLC, Orlando, for Guardian ad Litem. 

 December 8, 2023 

PER CURIAM.
2 

AFFIRMED. 

JAY, HARRIS, and SOUD, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2005 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic staple fiber. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic synthetic 

staple fiber. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE DYED 

4 FIBER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2005 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic staple fiber dyed 

(polyacrylonitrile staple), not 

carded, combed, or otherwise 

processed for spinning, containing by weight a minimum 

of 92 percent 

polyacrylonitrile, not more 

than .01 percent zinc and 

from 2 to 8 percent water, 

imported in the form of staple fiber with a filament 

decitex of 4.0 decitex to 6.7 

decitex (plus or minus 10 

percent) with a fiber shrinkage of 0 to 22 percent (plus 

or minus 10 percent) and a 

cut fiber length of 100 mm to 

135 mm with a target length 

of 120 mm (provided for in 

subheading 5503.30.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.2




SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp.(the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael G. Wirtz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, these financial statements were not reviewed by
our independent registered public accountants; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations


of the
Company.








Date:
June 17, 2008








/s/
Michael G. Wirtz


Chief
Financial Officer






18
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129188 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129188 

 COA: 252373 

Wayne CC: 03-008857-01 

SEAN PATRICK TERRY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 23, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1219 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 27, 2005 

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2132

 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-1,8-naphthalic anhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-1,8-NAPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      4-Chloro-1,8-       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        naphthalic                                                         31/2011.......
                        anhydride (CAS
                        No. 4053-08-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        2917.39.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Zandaria  Ventures  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 13, 2007


/s/ Jason Smart
------------------------------------------
Jason Smart, Principal Financial Officer





-------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Jerry MORGAN and Katy Morgan v. AMERICAN-FIRE AND INDEMNITY CO.

No. 87-C-1453.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Sept. 25, 1987.

In re Morgan, Jerry; Morgan, Katy; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA85 1502; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 68148.

Prior report: La.App., 506 So.2d 785.

Denied.

CALOGERO, DENNIS and WATSON, JJ., would grant the writ.
1800 M S TREET , N W

S UITE 800N

W ASHINGTON , D C 20036

T EL 202.783.4141

F AX 202.783.5851

WWW . WBKLAW . COM

R OBERT G . K IRK

R ACHEL S . W OLKOWITZ

202.383.3363

R K IRK @ WBKLAW . COM

December 30, 2015

VIA FDMS

Michael Huerta

Administrator

Federal Aviation Administration

1200 New Jersey Avenue

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Bonneville International Corporation d/b/a KSL Broadcast Group Petition 

for Exemption, Docket No. _____

Dear Mr. Huerta:

Enclosed, on behalf of Bonneville International Corporation d/b/a KSL Broadcast Group, 

is a Petition for Exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act 

of 2012 to authorize the use of small unmanned aerial systems for newsgathering purposes. 

If you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

WILKINSON BARKER KNAUER LLP

/s/ Robert G. Kirk

Robert G. Kirk

Rachel S. Wolkowitz

Counsel for Bonneville International Corporation 

d/b/a KSL Broadcast Group

Enclosure
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56933) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase
Plan-1991;(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-87897) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase
Plan-1991, 1995 Stock Option Plan for Directors, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and1999
Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan;(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-49892) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 1999 Nonqualified Stock Incentive Plan and 2000 Stock Incentive Plan;(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-56704) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan and 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust;(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-135697) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan;(6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-144552) pertaining to the OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., 2007 Performance Incentive Plan and 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and Trust;(7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-153206) pertaining to the OncoGenex Technologies,
Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan(8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-128030) pertaining to the registration for resale of
 shares of common stock of OncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and in the related Prospectus;
  /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kelvin ETHERRIDGE.

No. 88-KH-2545.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Etherridge, Kelvin; — Defendants); applying for supervisory/remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 323-945.

Denied.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO DE JESUS NATAREN 

LARA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 20-72145 

Agency No. A209-296-488 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 12, 2021**

Before TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Francisco de Jesus Nataren Lara, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-72145 

Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Conde Quevedo v. 

Barr, 947 F.3d 1238, 1241 (9th Cir. 2020). We deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Nataren Lara does not challenge the agency’s 

determination that his proposed particular social group of “extorted Salvadoran 

males who are returning with imputed wealth by gang members” is not cognizable. 

See Lopez-Vasquez v. Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013) (issues not 

specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). 

We do not consider Nataren Lara’s claim based on his proposed particular 

social group of “Salvadorans who actively protest against gangs and their 

activities” because the BIA did not decide the issue, see Santiago-Rodriguez v. 

Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) (review limited to the grounds relied on 

by the BIA), and the BIA did not err in declining to consider the claim where it 

was raised for the first time to the BIA, see Honcharov v. Barr, 924 F.3d 1293, 

1297 (9th Cir. 2019) (BIA did not err in declining to consider argument raised for 

the first time on appeal).

Thus, we deny the petition for review as to Nataren Lara’s asylum and 

withholding of removal claims.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 

Nataren Lara failed to show it is more likely than not he would be tortured by or 
3 20-72145 

with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to El Salvador. See 

Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009) (no likelihood of 

torture). 

We reject as unsupported by the record Nataren Lara’s contentions that the 

agency ignored evidence or otherwise erred in its analysis of his claims. 

Nataren Lara’s request for oral argument, raised in his opening brief, is 

denied. 

The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the 

mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.