alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 210A/25 m

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 210A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 65° anno25 maggio 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 210A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

65° anno25 maggio 2022

---

| Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Rettifica di Impresa comune Europa biocircolare (CBE) — Pubblicazione di un posto vacante di direttore esecutivo/direttrice esecutiva (Agente temporaneo — Grado AD 14) — COM/2022/20077( GU C 206 A del 23.5.2022 ) | 1 |

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2022/C 210 A/01

Rettifica di Impresa comune Europa biocircolare (CBE) — Pubblicazione di un posto vacante di direttore esecutivo/direttrice esecutiva (Agente temporaneo — Grado AD 14) — COM/2022/20077( GU C 206 A del 23.5.2022 )

( GU C 206 A del 23.5.2022 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 25.5.2022 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2022

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 210/1

---

Rettifica di «Impresa comune “Europa biocircolare” (CBE) — Pubblicazione di un posto vacante di direttore esecutivo/direttrice esecutiva (Agente temporaneo — Grado AD 14) — COM/2022/20077»

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea C 206 A del 23 maggio 2022
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

Pagina 5, «Termine ultimo per la presentazione delle candidature», comma primo:

| anziché: | «Il termine ultimo per l’iscrizione online è il 13 giugno 2022, ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles, dopo il quale l’iscrizione non sarà più possibile.», |
| --- | --- |

anziché:

«Il termine ultimo per l’iscrizione online è il 13 giugno 2022, ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles, dopo il quale l’iscrizione non sarà più possibile.»,

| leggasi: | «Il termine ultimo per l’iscrizione è il 4 luglio 2022, ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles, dopo il quale l’iscrizione non sarà più possibile.». |
| --- | --- |

leggasi:

leggasi:

«Il termine ultimo per l’iscrizione è il 4 luglio 2022, ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles, dopo il quale l’iscrizione non sarà più possibile.».

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 333-92178, 333-68614, 333-66290, and 333-62384) of SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc.
and subsidiaries of our reports dated June 28, 2002, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June
1, 2002 and June 2, 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
three fiscal years in the period from June 1, 1999 to June 1, 2002, and related
schedule, which reports appear in the June 1, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
SpeedFam-IPEC, Inc and subsidiaries.

Chicago, Illinois
August 23, 2002
Exhibit 11

EXHIBIT 11  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



|                                                            |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | -
|(In thousands, except per share data)                       |  | Three Months EndedMarch 31, |        
|                                                            |  | 2010                        |         |   | 2009 |  
|Basic and diluted numerator:                                |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Loss attributable to the Company  Common Shares            |  | $                           | (47,782 | ) |      | $ | (87,880 | )
|Less: Participating securities dividends                    |  |                             | 1,150   |   |      |   |        |  
|Income attributable to the Company  Unvested Shares        |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|                                                            |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Net loss attributable to the Company                        |  | $                           | (48,932 | ) |      | $ | (87,880 | )
|                                                            |  |                            
|Denominator:                                                |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Weighted average common shares  basic                      |  |                             | 355,461 |   |      |   | 355,331 |  
|Effect of dilutive securities:                              |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Stock options and restricted stock                          |  |                             |        |   |      |   |        |  
|                                                            |  |                             |         |   |      |   |         |  
|Weighted average common shares  diluted                    |  |                             | 355,461 |   |      |   | 355,331 |  
|                                                            |  |                            
|Net loss attributable to the Company per basic common share |  | $                           | (.14    | ) |      | $ | (.25    | )
|Net loss per diluted common share                           |  | $                           | (.14    | ) |      | $ | (.25    | )

Equity awards of 6.2 million and
7.1 million were outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive.
EXHIBIT 32.2
    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 I, Kam Shah, Chief Accounting Officer of Webtradex International, Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
  (1) The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/ Kam Shah
 Kam Shah
 Chief Accounting Officer
 
 Date: February 15, 2011
 
 ___________
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International, Inc. and
subsidiaries  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Deenis W. Lakomy,  Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  March 26, 2004                 /s/        Dennis W. Lakomy
                                      ----------------------------
                                      Dennis W. Lakomy
                                      Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided by CFC International,  Inc., and will be retained by CFC International,
Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
DESCRIPTION: STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
EXHIBIT 12.1

                                AEARO CORPORATION
                CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
                                                                             Year Ended September 30,
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>
                                                       1998            1999            2000             2001            2002
                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------     ------------    ------------

Earnings:
Pre tax income (loss) from continuing operations
                                                    $  (9,242)      $   10,297      $   12,624       $  (3,752)      $   11,104
Fixed Charges...............................            27,984          26,152          26,497           25,757          22,648
                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------     ------------    ------------
Earnings as defined.........................        $   18,742      $   36,449      $   39,121       $   22,005      $   33,752
                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------     ------------    ------------

Fixed Charge:
Interest Expense, net.......................        $   26,152      $   24,322      $   24,387       $   23,666      $   20,055
Interest component of operating lease.......             1,832           1,830           2,110            2,091           2,593
                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------     ------------    ------------
Fixed charges as defined....................        $   27,984      $   26,152      $   26,497       $   25,757      $   22,648
                                                    ------------    ------------    ------------     ------------    ------------

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges..........                 -         1.4                 1.5                -             1.5
                                                    ============    ============    ============     ============    ============
</TABLE>



Note:     Ratio of  earnings  to fixed  charges is defined  pre-tax  income from
          continuing  operations  plus fixed charges  divided by fixed  charges.
          Fixed  charges  include  interest  (including   amortization  of  debt
          issuance  costs) and a portion of rental expense  assumed to represent
          interest. Earnings for the years ended September 30, 1998 and 2001were
          insufficient  to cover fixed charges by $9.2 million and $3.8 million,
          respectively.
#### STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jerry L. LOCKE, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 19067.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Aug. 3, 1984.

Brooke C. Wells, Salt Lake City, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Ted Cannon, County Atty., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The defendant was convicted by the trial judge, sitting without a jury, of a felony burglary and a misdemeanor theft. He appeals and contends that the officer who testified on behalf of the prosecution was not a fingerprint expert under Rule 702, Utah Rules of Evidence, for lack of the “knowledge, skill, experience, training or education” therein required. Defendant argues that by permitting the officer to testify, the trial court committed prejudicial error requiring reversal of the convictions.

At the time of trial, the officer had been in law enforcement for 5 years, 11⁄81⁄8 of which as an identification technician. He was graduated from the Institute of Applied Science in fingerprint identification, after a 13-month home study course and had taken a 40-hour “latent print” course with the FBI. He had processed five sets of prints per week for a year and a half, and had been involved in 1,000 separate cases. He was a member of the Inter-mountain Association for Identification and he keeps abreast of the developments in this field. The defendant offered no professional or other witness to prove or even create a doubt as to the officer’s ability to render an opinion probative of the identity of the person whose prints are the subject of identification, nor did defendant offer any evidence tending to rebut the testimony of the officer that the prints were, in fact, those of defendant.

The matter of qualification of an expert witness lies in the discretion of the court.1 The trial judge found the officer *465competent to testify, and from a review of the record we find no compelling reason to find that he abused his discretion in making this finding.

The convictions and sentences are affirmed.

1

. *State v. Clayton,*Utah, 646 P.2d 723 (1982); *Marsh v. Irvine,*22 Utah 2d 154, 449 P.2d 996 (1969).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|September 14, 2005
Order entered March 4 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00993

- CV

RAUL GALVEZ, Appellant

V.

TORNADO BUS COMPANY D/B/A TORNADO MONEY TRANSFERS AND JUAN VASQUEZ , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial Dist rict Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 11

- 15700



### O RDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 27, 2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to

file reply brief and ORDER the reply brief filed no later than March 21, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIE RS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of ZD Ventures Corp a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2016 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

*/s/ Terence Robinson*

Terence Robinson

Chief Executive and Financial  Officer

(Principal executive and financial officer)

 

Date: February 15, 2017
EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of CDoor Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Asher Zwebner of the
Company, Principal Financial Officer certify to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 13650, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     /s/ Asher Zwebner
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Asher Zwebner
                                                     Principal Financial Officer
                                                     October 11 2006
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN

NO. 03-00-00151-CR

Leslie Blaylar k, Appellant
v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE

DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAV IS COUNTY, 167 TH J

UDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 0996458, HONORAB LE CHARLES F. CAMPBELL , JR. , JUDGE PRESIDING

Leslie B laylark appeals from judgments of conviction for aggr avated sexual assa ult
and b urg la

ryof a habitation. See Tex. Penal Cod e Ann
. §§ 22.021, 30. 02 (We st S upp. 2001)
. The jury assessed punishment for the aggravated sexual assault at imprisonment for li fe, and for the bur glar y at impr isonment f or f ifty year s. Appe llant ’s court-appointe d attorney filed a brief concludin

g that th e a ppeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements o f Ander s v. Califor

nia , 386 U. S. 738 (1967), by presenting a prof essional evaluation of the record demonstrating wh y t here a re no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio , 488 U. S. 75 (19 88); High v. State , 573 S
. W. 2d 807(Tex. Crim. App. 1978) ; Curr ie v. State , 516 S. W. 2d 684 (Tex. Cri m. App. 1974) ; Jackson v. State , 485 S
. W. 2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972) ; Gainous v. State , 436 S. W. 2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969)
. A copy of co unse l’s brief was deli

vered to appe llant, and appellant2

was advised of his right to ex amin e t he ap pe ll ate re cord

and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has been filed. We have reviewed the recor d and counsel’s brief an d agree that the appea l is frivolous and withou t mer it. We find not hing in th e recor d that mig ht ar guably su pport the appeal. The judgments of conviction are affir med.

Jan P. Patter son, Justice B efore Chief

Justice Abouss ie, Justices Yeake l and Patter son Affirm ed F iled: April 12, 2001 Do N ot Pu blish
##### 



Exhibit
10.47
 Amendment Number 1
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 1  and  ASSIGNMENT 
DATED JULY 1, 2005to the

MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT
by and between
UNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY.
and
APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
DATED AUGUST 11, 2004
 Amendment Agreement (Unicare Vendor Amendment Effective Date
  AMENDMENT
 1. Master Services Agreement
 (a)
    
    Add the following Section 3.20.1:
 Entity
 (b)
    
    Section 33.14 is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:
 33.14 Third Party Beneficiaries .
  2005-08-03
    
    APAC & WellPoint Confidential
    
    Page 1 of 3




---



##### 



Amendment Number 1
 2. Statements of Work
 (a)
    
    Statement of Work A
 (i)
    
    Add the following paragraph prior to Section 1 of Statement of Work A on
page 1 of Statement of Work A:
 Entity
 (ii)
    
    Throughout Statement of Work A, replace the defined term Company with the defined term
Entity.
 (b)
    
    Statement of Work B
 (i)
    
    Add the following paragraph prior to Section 1 of Statement of Work B on page 1 of
Statement of Work B:
 Entity
 (ii)
    
    Throughout Statement of Work B, replace the defined term Company with the defined
term Entity.
 ASSIGNMENT
 WellPoint
 Confirmation of Agreement
   2005-08-03
    
    APAC & WellPoint Confidential
    
    Page 2 of 3




---



##### 



Amendment Number 1
  Wellpoint
    
    VendorWELLPOINT, INC., an Indiana corporation
    
    APAC Customer Services, Inc., an Illinois corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Robert Bushey
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Michael DorionName: Robert Bushey
    
    
    
    Name: Michael DorionTitle: Staff Vice President
    
    
    
    Title: VP Operational PlanningSourcing & Supplier PerformanceUnicare
    
    VendorUNICARE LIFE AND HEALTH 
INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
    
    APAC Customer Services, Inc., an Illinois
corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Robert Bushey
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Kenneth R. BatkoName: Robert Bushey
    
    
    
    Name: Kenneth R. BatkoTitle: Staff Vice President
    
    
    
    Title: Acting CFOSourcing & Supplier Performance
  2005-08-03
    
    APAC & WellPoint Confidential
    
    Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Date: August 7, 2008
   /s/  Chand
    Khan
  Chand Khan
 Senior Vice President and Chief
    Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. do hereby certify that to the best of their knowledge:

(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Alan H. Auerbach                 
|                    |  | Alan H. Auerbach                     
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                    | 
|Dated: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Charles R. Eyler                 
|                    |  | Charles R. Eyler                     
|                    |  | Treasurer