### 1999 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

4-13-1999 

# M a tt eo v . S upt S C I Al bion

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ock e t 96-2115

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 1999 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. 

### R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M a tt e o v . S u pt S C I Al b ion " (1999). 1999 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 97. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_1999/97Filed April 12, 1999

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 96-2115

ANTHONY N. MATTEO, Appellant

v.

SUPERINTENDENT, SCI ALBION; THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER; THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania D.C. Civil Action No. 96-cv-06041 (Honorable Joseph L. McGlynn, Jr.)

Argued January 30, 1998 Before: MANSMANN, COWEN and RENDELL, Circuit Judges

Argued En Banc November 23, 1998 Before: BECKER, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, STAPLETON, GREENBERG, SCIRICA, NYGAARD, ALITO, ROTH, LEWIS, McKEE, RENDELL and COWEN, Circuit Judges

(Opinion Filed: March 24, 1999)

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The slip opinion in the above case filed March 24, 1999 is hereby amended as follows:

1. On page 44, at the end of Section III, the foll owing sentence should be added:Judge Nygaard joins in this concurring opin ion.

2. On page 45, line 3 - "Matteos" should be "Matteo 's".

3. On page 45, line 5 - "Matteos" should be "Matteo 's".

4. On page 45, line 14 - "interpretative" should be "interpretive".

5. On page 45, line 34 - end the single quote afte r the word "to".

6. On page 45, line 36 - "petitioners" shoul d be "petitioner's".

7. On page 47, line 14 - "petitioners" shoul d be "petitioner's".

8. On page 47, line 30 - "defendants" should be "defendant's".

9. On page 47, line 38 - "cases" should be "case's"

.
10. On page 47, line 40 - "petitioners" should be "petitioner's".

11. On page 48, line 24 - "Teagues" should be "Teag ue's".

12. On page 48, line 26 - "(3)" should be "(d)".

13. On page 49, line 10 - "Matteos" should be "Matt eo's".

14. On page 49, line 11 - "courts" should be "cour t's".

15. On page 49, line 34 - "Matteos" should be "Matt eo's".

16. On page 50, line 22 - "Matteos" should be "Matt eo's".

17. On page 50, line 24 - "Lubkings" should be "Lubking's".

18. On page 50, line 28 - "Lubkings" should be "Lubking's".

19. On page 51, at the beginning of the first full paragraph, delete "I agree with the majority's anal ysis of S 2254(d)(1)" and replace with the following:

I join in Parts I and II of the majority op inion,

20. On page 63, first full paragraph, line 8 the wo rd "had" should be "has." The phrase should read: "if the statecourt has disregarded the law or has engage d inflawed

reasoning in applying it."

21. On page 64, the penultimate line of footnote 7, there should be a space between "S7841" and "(dai ly ed. June 7, 1995)."

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Anthony J. Scirica Circuit Judge

Dated: April 12, 1999

A True Copy: Teste:

Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit