8194 Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 30/Wednesday, February 13, 2008/Rules and Regulations

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this

document are available for inspection or

copying at Commander (dpw), Eleventh

Coast Guard District, Building 50-2,

Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA

94501-5100, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, except Federal

holidays. The telephone number is (510)

437-3516. The Eleventh Coast Guard

District maintains the public docket for

this temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER.INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section,

Eleventh Coast Guard District,

telephone (510) 437-3516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The.

California Department of Transportation

requested a temporary change to the

operation of the Tower Drawbridge,

mile 59.0, over the Sacramento River, at

Sacramento, CA. The Tower Drawbridge

navigation span provides a vertical

clearance of 30 feet above Mean High

Water in the closed-to-navigation

position. The draw opens on signal as

required by 33 CFR 117.5. Navigation on

the waterway is commercial and

recreational.

The drawspan will be secured in the

closed-to-navigation position 1:45 p.m.

through 2:45 p.m. on February 19, 2008

to allow participants in the Tour of

California Bicycle Race to cross the

bridge during the event. This temporary

deviation has been coordinated with

waterway users. There are no schdduled

river boat cruises or anticipated levee

maintenance during this deviation

period. No objections to the temporary

deviation were raised.

Vessels that can transit the bridge,

while in the closed-to-navigation *

position, may continue to do so at any

time.

in the event of an emergency the

drawspan can be opened with 30

minutes advance notice.

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),

the drawbridge must return to its regular

operating schedule immediately at the

end of the designated time period. This

deviation from the operating regulations

is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

Dated: January 29, 2008.

C.E. Bone,

Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,

Eleventh Coast Guard District.

[FR Doc. E8-2689 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2007-1002; FRL-8521-5]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; State of

Colorado; Regulation No. 7, Section

XII, Volatile Organic Compounds From

Oil and Gas Operations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final

action to approve a State

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisionsubmitted by the State of Colorado. On

August 3, 2007, the Govehnor's designee

submitted revisions to Colorado's

Regulation No. 7, "Emissions of Volatile

Organic Compounds," Section XII,

"Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)

From Oil and Gas Operations." EPA is

approving the revisions to Regulation

No. 7, Section XII. This action is being

taken under Section 110 of the Clean

Air Act.

DATES: This direct final rule is effective

on April 14, 2008 without further

notice, unless EPA receives adverse

comment by March 14, 2008. If adverse

comment is received, EPA will publish

a timely withdrawal of the direct final

rule in the Federal. Register informing

the public that the rule will not take

effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,

identified by Docket Number EPA-R08-

OAR-2007-1002, by one of the

following methods:

* http://www.regulations.gov. Follow

the on-line instructions for submitting

comments.

* E-mail: videtich.cullie@epa.gov and

fiedler.kerri@epa.gov. o Fax: (303) 312-6064 (please. alert

the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing

comments).

* Mail: Callie A. Videtich, Director,

Air and Radiation Program,

Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595

Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado

80202-1129.

* Hand Delivery: Callie A. Videtich,

Director, Air and Radiation Program,

Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595

Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado

80202-1129. Such deliveries are only

accepted Monday through Friday, 8 a.m.

to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal .

holidays. Special arrangements should

be made for deliveries of boxed

information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to

Docket ID No. EPA-R08-OAR-2007-.

1002. EPA's policy is that all comments

received will be included in the public

docket without change and may be

made available at htp:l/

www.regulations.gov, including any

personal information provided, unless

the comment includes information

claimed to be Confidential Business

Information (CBI) or other information

whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Do not submit information that you

consider to be CBI or otherwise

protected through http://

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an "anonymous access" system, which

means EPA will not know your identity

or contact information unless you

provide it in the body of your comment.

If you send an e-mail comment directly

to EPA, without going through http://

www.regulations.gov your e-mail

address will be automatically captured

and included as part of the comment

that is placed in the public docket and

made available on the Internet. If you

submit an electronic comment, EPA

recommends that you include your

name and other contact information in

the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA

cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact

you for clarification, EPA may not be

able to consider your comment.

Electronic files should avoid the use of

special characters, any form of

encryption, and be free of any defects or

viruses. For additional information

about EPA's public docket, visit the EPA

Docket Center homepage at http://

www..epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

For additional instructions on

submitting comments, go to Section I.

General Information of the

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of

this document.

Docket: All documents in the docket

are listed in the http://

www.regulations.gov index. Although

listed in the index, some information is

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other

information whose disclosure is

restricted by statute. Certain other

material, such as copyrighted material,

will be publicly available only in hard

copy. Publicly available docket

materials are available either

electronically in http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at

the Air and Radiation Program,

Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,

Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. EPA

requests that if at all possible, you

contact the individual listed in the FOR

HeinOnline -- 73 Fed. Reg. 8194 2008
Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 30/Wednesday, February 13, 2008/Rules and Regulations

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to

view the hard copy of the docket. You

may view the hard copy of the docket

Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to

4 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kerri Fiedler, Air and Radiation

Program, Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA), Region 8, Mailcode

8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver,

Colorado 80202-1129, phone (303) 312-

6493, and e-mail at:

fiedler.kerri@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

1. General Information

11. What is the purpose of this action?

III. What is the State's process to submit

these materials to EPA?

IV. EPA's Evaluation of the Regulation No. 7,

Section XII, Revisions

V. Consideration of Section 110(1) of the CAA

VI. Final Action

VII. Statutory and Executive Order ReViews

Definitions

For the purpose of this document, we are giving meaning to certain words or

initials as follows:

(i) The words or initials Act or CAA

mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,

unless the context indicates otherwise.

(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our

mean or refer to the United States

Environmental Protection Agency.

(iii) The initials NAAQS mean

National Ambient Air Quality Standard.

(iv) The initials SIP mean or refer to

State Implementation Plan.

(v) The word State means the State of

Colorado, unless the context indicates

otherwise.

I. General Information

A. What Should I Consider as I Prepare

My Comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBL Do not submit this

information to EPA through http://

regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark

the part or all of the information that

you claim to be CBI. For CBI

information in a disk or CD ROM that

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the

disk or CD ROM as CBI and then

identify electronically within the disk or

CD ROM the specific information that is

claimed as CBI. In addition to one

complete version of the comment that

includes information claimed as CBI, a

copy of the comment that does not

contain the information claimed as CBI

must be submitted for inclusion in the

public docket. Information so marked

will not be disclosed except in

accordance with procedures set forth in

40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.

When submitting comments, remember

to:

I. Identify the rulemaking by docket

number and other identifying

information (subject heading, Federal

Register date and page number).

II. Follow directions-The agency

may ask you to respond to specific

questions or organize comments by

referencing a Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) part or section

number.

III. Explain why you agree or disagree;

suggest alternatives and substitute

language for your requested changes.

IV. Describe any assumptions and

provide any technical information and/

or data that you used.

V. If you estimate potential costs or

burdens, explain how you arrived at

your estimate in sufficient detail to

allow for it to be reproduced.

VI. Provide specific examples to

illustrate your concerns, and suggest

alternatives.

VII. Explain your views as clearly as

possible, avoiding the use of profanity

or personal threats.

VIII. Make sure to submit your

comments by the comment period

deadline identified.

II. What is the purpose of this action?,

In this action, we are approving

revisions to Regulation No. 7, Section

XII, for the control of VOC emissions

from oil and gas operations. James B.

Martin, the Executive Director of the

Colorado Department of Public Health

and Environment, submitted these

revisions to us on August 3, 2007.

We previously approved Regulation

No. 7, Section XII, on August 19, 2005

(see 70 FR 48652) as part of Denver's

Early Action Compact (EAC) SIP for the

8-hour ozone standard. The purpose of

the EAC SIP is to prevent exceedances

of the 8-hour ozone standard in the

Denver EAC area.' Due to unanticipated

growth of condensate tank emissions in

the oil and gas sector, the State

determined that the version of

Regulation No. 7, Section XII, that we

approved in 2005 needed to be revised.

1 In April 2004, EPA designated the Denver area

(Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Broomfield, Denver,

Douglas, Jefferson, and parts of Larimer and Weld

counties) as non-attainment for the 8-hour ozone

standard, but deferred the effective date of the

designation based on a commitment from the State

of Colorado, the Regional Air Quality Council and

others to implement ozone control measures sooner

than required by the Clean Air Act. This

commitment was contained in the Denver Early

Action Compact (EAC). The non-attainment

designation for the area became effective November

20, 2007, as a result of a violation for 2005-2007,

which triggers requirements for future revisions to

the attainment demonstration SIP for the Denver

EAC area.

The version of Regulation No. 7, Section

XII, submitted August 3, 2007 requires

a greater level of control of condensate

tank emissions in the 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.

I. What is the State's process to

submit these materials to EPA?

Section 110(k) of the CAA addresses

our actions on submissions of SIP

revisions. The CAA requires States to

observe certain procedural requirements

in developing SIP.revisions. Section

110(a)(2) of the CAA requires that each

SIP revision be adopted by a State after

reasonable notice and public hearing.

This must occur before a State submits

the revision to us. The Colorado Air Quality Control

Commission (AQCC) held public

hearings for the revisions to Regulation

No. 7, Section XII, on November 17,

2006, November 18, 2006, and

December 17, 2006. The AQCC adopted

the revisions on January 5, 2007. The

revisions became State effective on

March 4, 2007.

We have evaluated the revisions to,

Regulation No. 7, Section XII, and have

determined that the State met the

requirements for reasonable notice and

public hearing under section 110(a)(2)

of the CAA.

IV. EPA's Evaluation of the Regulation

No. 7, Section XII, Revisions

Colorado's Regulation No. 7, Section

XII, "Volatile Organic Compound

Emissions From Oil And Gas

Operations," imposes emission control

requirements on oil and gas condensate

tanks located in the Denver EAC area,

with the majority of affected facilities

being located in southern Weld County.

Among other things, Regulation No. 7,

Section XII, includes definitions;

required emission reductions for the

high ozone season and rest of the year;

numerous recordkeeping requirements

for a spreadsheet to determine weekly

and other periodic compliance;

emission factors used to demonstrate

compliance; reporting requirements for

certain equipment if a construction or

Title V permit is issued by the State; a

methodology for approval of alternative

emissions control equipment;

requirements for gas-processing plants;

requirements for controlling emissions

from dehydration units; and a

methodology for approval to develop

testing methods and revised emission

factors.

The condensate tank requirements,

along with other requirements

applicable to oil and gas operations and

natural gas fired reciprocating internal

combustion engines, were initially

promulgated in March 2004, and later

8195 I

HeinOnline -- 73 Fed. Reg. 8195 2008
8196 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

revised in December 2004. Colorado

submitted these requirements to us as a

SIP revision, which we approved on

August 19, 2005 (see 70 FR 48652).

Colorado designed the emission limits

in the 2004 revision of Regulation No.

7, Section X11, to achieve total

condensate'tank VOC emissions in the

Denver EAC area during the summer

ozone season of no more than 91.3 tons

per day (tpd) as of May 1, 2007, and

100.9 tpd as of May 1, 2012. These daily

values were relied on to demonstrate

attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard

in the modeling analysis, as part of the

EAC SIP. However, because of

unanticipated growth of condensate

tank emissions, the State later

determined that the emission limits in

the 2004 version of Regulation No. 7

would be insufficient to meet these

daily emission numbers. The 2007

revisions require a greater level of

control of condensate tank emissions

within the 8-hour ozone non-attainment

area boundary. The State's goal remains

to achieve the same daily emission

targets for condensate tank VOC

emissions.

We note that the VOC emission

reductions that are required by

Regulation No. 7, Section XII, are

achieved not by specific requirements

on each condensate tank, but instead by

overall or system-wide emission

reductions for each affected company's

operations. As stated in Regulation No.

7, Section XII, the requirement to

control emissions applies to owners or

operators of condensate tanks with a

cumulative total of 30 tons per year or

more of VOC emissions. In practice,

industry has controlled the condensate

tank VOC emissions with flares or vapor

recovery units, and Regulation No. 7,

Section XII, requires these types of

emission control devices to. achieve

95% control efficiency.

Revised Regulation No. 7, Section XII,

raises the system-wide control

requirements for the ozone season from

the 47.5% VOC reduction requirement

that applied from May 1, 2006, through

September 30, 2006, to 75% from May

1 through September 30 of each year

from 2007 through 2011. For the period

from May 1 through September 30 of

each year, beginning with 2012, VOC

emissions from condensate tanks must

be reduced by 78% from uncontrolled

actual emissions. Determination of

compliance during the ozone season

will be on a weekly basis. For the nonozone season, the State revised the

required reduction of condensate tank

VOC emissions from 38% to 60% in

2007, and beginning in 2008, and each

year thereafter, VOC emissions between

October 1 and April 30 must be reduced

by 70% from uncontrolled actual

emissions. Emission reductions during

the non-ozone season must be

calculated as an average of the emission

reductions achieved during this sevenmonth period.

In addition to the changes to the

system-wide reduction requirements,

the State adopted significant changes to

the monitoring, recordkeeping, and

reporting requirements. Owners or

operators of any condensate storage tank

that is being controlled under

Regulation No. 7, Section XII, must

inspect or monitor the control

equipment at least weekly. Types of

equipment include combustion devices,

vapor recovery units, valves, and thief

hatches. As noted above, the recordkeeping provisions require owners or

operators to maintain a spreadsheet to

track emission reductions on a weekly

basis during the ozone season (May 1

through September 30). In addition to

the spreadsheet, owners or operators are

required to maintain records of

monitoring and inspection activities.

The reporting provisions require owners

or operators to submit an annual report

by April 30 of each year, and also a

semi-annual report by November 30 of

each year, detailing emission reductions

during the preceding year and ozone

season, respectively. Finally, provisions

have been added to require owners or

operators subject to the condensate

storage tank reduction requirements to

submit a list of all their controlled tanks

on April 30 of each year; to notify the

State monthly during the ozone season

of any change to the list of controlled

tanks; and to notify the State monthly of

any instance where the air pollution

control equipment was not properly

functioning and the steps taken to

correct the problem. We have reviewed

and are approving the revisions to

Regulation No. 7, Section XII, "Volatile

Organic Compounds From Oil and Gas

Operations" because they require

greater reductions in emissions and

meet the requirements of section 110 of

the CAA.

V. Consideration of Section 110(1) of the

CAA

Section 110(1) of the CAA states that

a SIP revision cannot be approved if the

revision would interfere with any

applicable requirement concerning'

attainment and reasonable further

progress towards attainment of a

NAAQS, or any other applicable

requirement of the CAA. The revisions

to Regulation No. 7, Section XII, will not

interfere with attainment, reasonable

further progress, or any other applicable

requirement of the CAA.

VI. Final Action

In this action, EPA is approving the

revisions to Regulation No. 7, Section

XII, that were submitted on August 3,

2007. The version of Section XII we are

approving supersedes and replaces the

prior version we approved at 70 FR

48652 (August 19, 2005). EPA is

publishing this rule without prior

proposal because the Agency views this

as a non-controversial amendment and

anticipates no adverse comments.

However, in the "Proposed Rules"

section of today's Federal Register

publication, EPA is publishing a

separate document that will serve as the

proposal to approve the SIP revision if

adverse comments are filed. This rule

will be effective April 14, 2008 without

further notice unless the Agency

receives adverse comments by March

14, 2008. If the EPA receives adverse

comments, EPA will publish a timely

withdrawal in the Federal Register

informing the public 'that the rule will

not take effect. EPA will address all

public comments in a subsequent final

rule based on the proposed rule. The

EPA will not institute a second

comment period on this action. Any

parties interested in commenting must

do so at this time. Please note that if

EPA receives adverse comment on an

amendment, paragraph, or section of

this rule and if that provision may be

severed from the remainder of the rule,

EPA may adopt as final those provisions

of the rule that are not the subject of an

adverse comment.

VII. Statutory and Executive Order

Reviews

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is

not a "significant regulatory action"

and, therefore, is not subject to review

by the Office of Management and

Budget. For this reason, this action is

also not subject to Executive Order

13211, "Actions Concerning Regulations

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,

Distribution, or Use" (66 FR 28355, May

22, 2001). This action merely approves

state law as meeting Federal

requirements and imposes no additional

requirements beyond those imposed by

state law. Accordingly, the

Administrator certifies that this rule

will not have a significant economic

impact on a substantial fiumber of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this

rule approves pre-existing requirements

under state law and does not impose

any additional enforceable duty beyond

that required by state law, it does not

contain any unfunded mandate or

significantly or uniquely affect small

HeinOnline -- 73 Fed. Reg. 8196 2008
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 30 / Wednesday, February 13, 2008 / Rules and Regulations

governments, as described in the

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

(Pub. L. 104-4).

This rule also does not have tribal

implications because it will not have a

substantial direct effect on one or more

Indian tribes, on the relationship

between the Federal Government and

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities between the

Federal Government and Indian tribes,

as specified by Executive Order 13175

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This

action also does not have Federalism

implications because it does not have

substantial direct effects on the states,

on the relationship between the national

government and the states, or on the

distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various

levels of government, as specified in

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,

August 10, 1999). This action merely

approves a state rule implementing a Federal'standard, and does not alter the

relationship or the distribution of power

and responsibilities established'in the

Clean Air Act. This rule also is not

subject to Executive Order 13045

"Protection of Children from

Environmental Health Risks and-Safety

Risks" (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),

because it is not economically

significant.

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's

role is to approve state choices,

provided that they meet the criteria of

the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the

absence of a prior existing requirement

for the State to use voluntary consensus

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority

to disapprove a SIP submission for

failure to use VCS. It would thus be

inconsistent with applicable law for

EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,

to use VCS in place of a SIP submission

that otherwise satisfies the provisions of

the Clean Air Act. Thus, the

requirements of section 12(d) of the

National Technology Transfer and

Advancemefit Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.

272 note) do not apply. This rule does

not impose an information collection

burden under the provisions of the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small

Business Regulatory Enforcement

Fairiess Act of 1996, generally provides

that before a rule may take effect, the

agency promulgating the rule must

submit a rule report, which includes a

copy of the rule, to each House of the

Congress and to the Comptroller General

of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other

required information to the U.S. Senate,

the U.S. House of Representatives, and

the Comptroller General of the United

States prior to publication of the rule in

the Federal Register. A major rule

cannot take effect until 60 days after it

is published in the Federal Register.

This action is not a "major rule" as

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of

this action must be filed in the United

States Court of Appeals for the

appropriate circuit by April 14, 2008.

Filing a petition for reconsideration by

the Administrator of this final rule does

not affect the finality of this rule for the

purposes of judicial review nor does it

extend the time within which a petition

for judicial review may be filed, and

shall not postpone the effectiveness of

such rule or action. This action may not

be challenged later in proceedings to

enforce its requirements. (See section

307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air

pollution control, Incorporation by

reference, Intergovernmental relations,

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping

requirements, Volatile organic

compounds.

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Dated: January 15, 2008.

Robert E. Roberts,

Regional Administrator, Region VIII.

* 40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as

follows:

PART 52-[AMENDED]

M 1. The authority citation for part 52

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart G-Colorado

* 2. Section 52.320 is amended by

adding paragraph (c)(112) to read as

follows:

§ 52.320 Identification of plan.

(* * ***

(c)***

(112) On Aigust 3, 2007, the

Governor of Colorado submitted

revisions to the Colorado's Regulation

No. 7 "Emissions of Volatile Organic

Compounds" that made several changes

and additions to Section XII, "Volatild

Organic Compound Emissions From Oil

and Gas Operations."

(i) Incorporation by reference.

(A) Regulation No. 7 "Emissions of

Volatile Organic Compounds," 5 CCR

1001-9, Section XII, "Volatile Organic

SUMMARY: EPA is granting final approval

to Ohio's request for the retirement and

withdrawal of 240 oxides of nitrogen

(NOx) allowances from the State's 2005

new source set aside. Retiring 240 new

source set aside allowances will provide

surplus emission reductions to help

compensate for the discontinuation of

Ohio's motor vehicle inspection and

maintenance program (known as "ECheck") in the Cincinnati and Dayton

areas for the year 2006. (Ohio is in the

process of seeking approval of the

removal of E-Check as an active program

from the State Implementation Plan

(SIP), which will be addressed in a

separate action.) EPA received adverse

comments and one positive comment on

our proposed rulemaking on the

allowance retirement. These comments

are addressed in this notice. As a result

of this action, 240 NOx allowances from

the State's 2005 new source set aside

will be withheld and permanently

retired.

DATES: This final rule is effective on

March 14, 2008.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a

docket for this action under Docket ID

No. EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0976. All

documents in the docket are listed on

the www.regulations.gov Web site.

Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available,

i.e., Confidential Business Information

(CBI) or other information whose

disclosure is restridted by statute.

Certain other material, such as

copyrighted material, is not placed on

the Internet and will be publicly

available only in hard copy form.

Publicly available docket materials are

available either electronically through

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at

the Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,

8197 I

Compound Emissions From Oil and Gas

Operations," effective on March 4, 2007.

[FR Doc. E8-2512 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2006-0976; FRL-8526-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air

Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio;

Oxides of Nitrogen Budget Trading

Program

AGENCY: Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

HeinOnline -- 73 Fed. Reg. 8197 2008