alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #13033 and #13034]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Kansas dated 03/12/2012. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and a Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         02/28/2012 through 02/29/2012. *Effective Date:*
                         03/12/2012. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/11/2012. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/12/2012.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and  Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Wabaunsee. *Contiguous Counties:* Kansas: Geary, Lyon, Morris, Osage, Pottawatomie, Riley, Shawnee. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.750Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere 4.000.Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 13033 B and for economic injury is 13034 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Kansas. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: March 12, 2012. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2012-6683 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 52 (Friday, March 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS).
    Title: Requests for Appointment of Technical Advisory Committee.
    OMB Control Number: 0694-0100.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular submission.
    Burden Hours: 5.
    Number of Respondents: 1.
    Average Hours Per Response: 5.
    Needs and Uses: This collection of information is required by the 
Export Administration Regulations and the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act. The Technical Advisory Committees (TACs) were established to 
advise and assist the U.S. Government on export control matters. Under 
this collection, interested parties may submit a request to BIS to 
establish a new TAC. BIS provides administrative support for these 
TACs.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit; not-for-profit 
institutions.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, (202) 395-3123.
    Copies of the above information collection proposal can be obtained 
by calling or writing Jennifer Jessup, Departmental Paperwork Clearance 
Officer, (202) 482-0336, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4aeaea1b7b7b1b484a0aba7eaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f892929d8b8b8d88b89c979bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>).
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk Officer, Fax number (202) 395-5167 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#80cae1f3ede5e5f4dfcbaedfd3e5e5e8f2e1c0efede2aee5eff0aee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d298b3a1bfb7b7a68d99fc8d81b7b7baa0b392bdbfb0fcb7bda2fcb5bda4">[email protected]</span></a>.

Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-6416 Filed 3-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2239

LEONARD L. CLAY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. KENNETH RILEY, ILA Local Union 1422 , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv
- 03038

- DCN )

Submitted : May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER , MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Leonard Clay , Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr. , Cheryl H. Ledbetter , GIBBS & HOLMES , Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PE R CURIAM:
Leonard L. Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief

. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clay’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Clay h as forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Maria MUNILLA, Madeleine Munilla and Ricardo Elortegui, Appellants, v. Evelio S. ESPINOSA and Henry Betancourt, Appellees.

No. 88-1139.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

Otto De Cordoba and J. Alfredo Armas, Miami, for appellants.

Mark A. Kamilar, Miami, and Steven D. Caster, Hollywood, for appellees.

Before BARKDULL and PEARSON, DANIEL and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We treat a timely petition for common law certiorari as a non-final appeal from an order extending a Lis Pendens and refusing to dissolve same or require a bond.1 The action in the trial court not being “founded” on a “recorded instrument” or “mechanic’s lien”, it was error for the trial court not to require the posting of a bond. See Section 48.23(2), Florida Statutes (1987). The defendant having moved to dissolve the Lis Pendens or to require a bond (if extended subsequent to one year after it was originally filed) the trial court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion to extend without requiring a bond. We reverse so much of the trial court’s order that extended the Lis Pendens without bond, with directions to either dissolve it or require the posting of a bond. *Ross v.*
      *896
      *Breder,*528 So.2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); *Feinstein v. Dolene, Inc.,*455 So.2d 1126 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); *Mohican Valley, Inc. v. MacDonald,*443 So.2d 479 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).

REVERSED AND REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

. An order to dissolve a Lis Pendens or require a bond has been reviewed by common law cer-tiorari *James v. Wolfe,*512 So.2d 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); *First Southern Development Corporation*v. *Chandler and Associates, Inc.,*472 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); *Finney v. Wonder Development Corporation,*392 So.2d 583 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); *Cooper v. Moretti,*383 So.2d 705 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), however, it appears that the preferred method should be by non-final appeal and the order under review tested by the same principles as those relating to the issuance of the temporary injunction orders refusing to vacate same or matters relating to a bond or the sufficiency thereof.
[ep_ex10z15002.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15004.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15006.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15008.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15010.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15012.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15014.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15016.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15018.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15020.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15022.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15024.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15026.gif]



---

[ep_ex10z15028.gif]



---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 6, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
              Richard A. RappaportRichard A. Rappaport
              Principal Executive OfficerMay
              12,
              2006
#### STATE ex rel. Donald R. CAINE, E.B.R. Parish Prison v. Warden DEES.

No. 89-KH-0360.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Feb. 17, 1989.

In re Caine, Donald R.;—Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “L”.

Denied. No record of filing in trial court. Relator may file in the trial court.
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40291 Conference Calendar

__________________ THOMAS F. SODERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus STATE OF TEXAS et al., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-94-CV-742
- - - - - - - - - - December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Thomas F. Soderman appeals the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his civil rights action. Specifically, he contends that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for damages and declaratory relief against Officer Thomas Kibodeaux and Magistrate Judge James Blackstock. Because he has not sufficiently argued or briefed his other claims against Blackstock and Kibodeaux and his claims against the other defendants, they are considered abandoned, and we will notNo. 95-40291 -2- address them. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. We also warn Soderman that he should examine any pending filings to determine their merit and that any abuse of the judicial system will open Soderman to the possibility of monetary sanctions. AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), of Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on September 6, 2011 Cedarburg 
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 870 Badger Circle, Grafton, Wisconsin 53024, 
made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration 
(DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic 
classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine (8333)..  II
Fentanyl (9801)............................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution to its customers. Regarding the drug code 
(8333), the company plans to use this controlled substance to 
manufacture another controlled substance.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than March 19, 2012.

    Dated: January 6, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-656 Filed 1-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
#### STATE ex rel. Edward DEGREAT v. Hon. Jerome M. WINSBERG, Judge.

No. 89-KH-0149.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

In re Degreat, Edward; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “C”, No. 270-341.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of *Boykin*examination he has filed on or about November 15, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.
#### Scott E. ROVENGER, Appellant/Cross-appellee, v. Mara ROVENGER, Appellee/Cross-appellant.

No. 86-1692.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 28, 1987.

Kirkpatrick & Lockhart and Jeffrey Allen Tew and Robert B. Galt, III, Miami, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Bernard B. Weksler, Coral Gables, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before BARKDULL, BASKIN and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appeal and cross-appeal, we affirm the Order on Mandate of Appellate Court entered by the trial court.

Affirmed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 21, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on November 29, 2011, 76 FR 73679, Noramco Inc., 1440 Olympic Drive, Athens, Georgia 30601, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleCodeine-N-oxide (9053)
IDihydromorphine (9145)
IMorphine-N-oxide (9307)
IAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIMorphine (9300)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIAlfentanil (9737)
IISufentanil (9740)
IICarfentanil (9743)
IITapentadol (9780)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Noramco Inc., to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Noramco Inc., to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: March 8, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-6698 Filed 3-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. does hereby certify that, to his knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cougar Biotechnology, Inc.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ ALAN H. AUERBACH                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Alan H. Auerbach President and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE ex rel. Tyronne Joseph FORREST, Sr. v. Frank SHEA, Judge, Criminal District Court, Section “G”, New Orleans, Louisiana.

No. 88-KH-1607.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 20, 1988.

In re Forrest, Tyronne Joseph Sr.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 269-672.

Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the application to the district court with instructions to the trial judge to act on relator’s application for a writ of habeas corpus filed via certified mail on April 14, 1988.
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and, |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:              August 16, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Robert S. DeMeulemeester |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                      |   | Robert S. DeMeulemeester          |   |
|                                                                                                      |   | Chief Financial Officer           |   |