alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior is revising and renewing the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Scientific Committee (Committee).

The Committee provides advice on the feasibility, appropriateness, and scientific value of the OCS Environmental Studies Program to the Secretary of the Interior through the Director of BOEM. The Committee reviews the relevance of the research and data being produced to meet BOEM's scientific information needs for decision-making and may recommend changes in scope, direction, and emphasis.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Phyllis Clark, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Office of Environmental Program, Environmental Sciences Division, Herndon, Virginia 20170-4817, telephone, (703) 787-1716.

## Certification

                        I hereby certify that the renewal of the OCS Scientific Committee is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by 43 U.S.C. 1331*et. seq.*

Dated: March 9, 2012.

Ken Salazar,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2012-6296 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-VH-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mystica Candle Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Candace
Sikorski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November, 2006.


/s/ Candace Sikorski
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2304 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Butanediol Copolymers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Caprolactone-Butanediol 

Copolymers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPROLACTONE-BUTANEDIOL COPOLYMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-Oxepanone, polymer with 

1,4-butanediol (CAS No. 

31831–53–5) (provided for in 

subheading 3907.99.01) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2304 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 
 I, Robert W. Duggan, certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Pharmacyclics, Inc.; and
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date: April 8, 2015
 
 
 By:    /s/ Robert W. DugganRobert W. DugganChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### ARTHUR R. BARLOW *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

*David B. Rozwaski,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*Ronald G. Weller,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 8, 1998

The petitioner Arthur R. Barlow’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 937 (AC 16686), is denied.

BORDEN and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2203 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2203

   To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To renew the temporary suspension of duty on certain ion exchange 
                                 resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ION EXCHANGE RESIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.30 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to macroporous ion exchange 
resin comprising a copolymer of styrene crosslinked with 
divinylbenezene, thiol functionalized) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                          |                                                                                                              |                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
| Dated:                  August 14, 2007          |                                                                                                                   |                        |
|                                                                                          |                                                                                                              |                   |
|                                                                                          |                                                                                                              | /s/ Ban Jun Yang  |
|                                                                                          | Ban                      Jun Yang, President, CEO and Director (Principal                      Executive Officer) |

----
#### In the Matter of Raymond Ortiz, Appellant, v New York City Employees’ Retirement System, Respondent.

Order and Judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Kenneth Shorter, J.), entered on or about October 5, 1990, which denied and dismissed the CPLR article 78 petition seeking to annul and vacate respondent New York City Employees’ Retirement System’s determination denying him accidental disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner, while employed as an elevator mechanic with the New York City Housing Authority, sustained a disabling injury to his left knee when he attempted to step down from *238the top of an elevator car which he was repairing, caught his left foot in the elevator door’s gate-chain, and fell two to three feet to the floor below. In his disability retirement application, petitioner stated that he was not performing any unusual work when the accident occurred.

On appeal, petitioner argues his knee injury was proximately caused by his unexpected fall, and thus, that he is entitled to accidental disability pension benefits as a matter of law. We disagree. The nature of the occurrence was reasonably within the risk of the work performed and, as such, it cannot be construed as a sudden and unexpected event, which is a prerequisite to a grant of accident disability pension benefits *(see, e.g., Matter of Pratt v Regan,*68 NY2d 746). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 5, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard A. RappaportRichard
      A. RappaportPrincipal
      Executive OfficerApril
      23, 2009
#### H. H. SACKS, Inc., v. ATHERTON et al.

No. 3490.

Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1939.

*174Sidney Wedeen and Cohen & Wedeen, all of New York City, for appellant.

Lee M. Friedman and Friedman, Atherton, King & Turner, all of Boston, Mass., for appellees.

Before WILSON and MAGRUDER, Circuit Judges, and McLELLAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Having filed a notice of appeal in the District Court the appellant moves in this court for leave to appeal. Without pausing to consider whether leave to appeal is necessary in this type of case where more than $500 is involved (compare In re Albert Dickinson Co., 7 Cir., 104 F.2d 771 and London v. O’Dougherty, 2 Cir., 102 F. 2d 524) such leave is granted.

The appellant is the debtor in reorganization proceedings instituted under Section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U. S.C.A. § 207. The appeal is from an order of the District Judge in so far as he made certain allowances to the trustee, to an accountant, to an attorney for a creditors’ committee because they are too much and to counsel for the debtor, because of alleged inadequacy. The various petitions for compensation and disbursements were referred to a Referee -in Bankruptcy as Master.

After hearing the parties, he made a report containing his findings of fact and his recommendation of the allowances of which the appellant complains. The evidence on which the facts were found was not reported. While in view of the size of the estate the amounts recommended by the Master and approved by the Court are larger in the aggregate than would be appropriate in an ordinary case, this is not an ordinary case. Much of the work on which the allowances were based was required because of the conduct of the appellant “in not obeying instructions and particularly in the purchase of merchandise for sale in the stores!’. As the Master also found the trustee “was subjected “to harassment and abuse by the debtor and his attorney * * * in endeavoring to permit larger purchases of merchandise to be made which might involve him and the estate in great liabilities”. We can not say that under the circumstances the allowances which the appellant says are too high were unwarranted or that the allowance ■ to counsel for the debtor was inadequate.

The order of the District Judge confirming the report and making the allowances recommended by the Master involves no reversible error.

The order of the District Court is affirmed with costs to the appellees.
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Merante, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Creative Bakeries, Inc;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


         c)  presented  in  this  annual  report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.



Date: April 15, 2005


/s/ Anthony J. Merante
---------------------------
Anthony J. Merante
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Victor B. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 87-471.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Jan. 14, 1988.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Paula C. Coffman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

UPCHURCH, Chief Judge.

We reverse and remand for resentencing. *See Hankey v. State,*505 So.2d 701 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), which was not available to the trial court at the time of the original sentencing.

ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Candace Sikorski, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mystica Candle
     Corp.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of May, 2006.

/s/ Candace Sikorski
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# L_2006311EN.01002501.xml

| 10.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/25

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1658/2006

of 9 November 2006

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 of 20 February 2006 on the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 33(2)(a) and (4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 29 September 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 29 September 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 1433/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 58.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 10 November 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | White sugar | 20,41 | 20,41 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

White sugar

20,41

20,41

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---