Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 48 / Monday, March 12, 2012 / Notices 14501 

1Petitioners are DuPont Teijin Films, Mitsubishi 

Polyester Film, Inc., SKC, Inc., and Toray Plastics 

(America), Inc. 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel 

Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Notice 

of Preliminary Results of the Seventeenth 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR 

55004 (September 6, 2011) (Preliminary Results). 

2As noted in the Preliminary Results, the 

Department selected HYSCO, POSCO, Dongbu, and 

Union as mandatory respondents in this review. See 

Memorandum from Dennis McClure, International 

Trade Compliance Analyst, through James Terpstra, 

Program Manager, to Melissa Skinner, Director, 

Office 3, entitled ‘‘17th Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Corrosion-Resistant 

Carbon Steel Flat Products from the Republic of 

Korea: Selection of Respondents for Individual 

Review,’’ dated October 29, 2010. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Extension of 

Time Limit for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: March 12, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi 

Blum or Toni Page, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 

1398, respectively. 

Background 

On August 26, 2011, the Department 

of Commerce (Department) published a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review under the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on polyethylene 

terephthalate film, sheet and strip from 

India covering the period July 1, 2010, 

through June 30, 2011. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 53404 

(August 26, 2011). The Department 

initiated the review with respect to 

seven companies, Ester Industries 

Limited, Garware Polyester Ltd., Jindal 

Polyfilms Limited of India (Jindal), 

Polypacks Industries (Polypacks), 

Polyplex Corporation Ltd. (Polyplex), 

SRF Limited (SRF), and Vacmet India, 

Ltd. (Vacmet). On August 23, 2011, 

Vacmet and Polypacks timely withdrew 

their requests for a review. The 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the AD administrative review 

with respect to Vacmet and Polypacks 

on September 20, 2011. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Rescission, In 

Part, of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 58244 

(September 20, 2011). On November 25, 

2011, Petitioners 1 timely withdrew 

their request for AD administrative 

reviews of Ester and Garware, and the 

Department published a rescission, in 

part, of the AD administrative review of 

the aforementioned companies on 

January 25, 2012. See Polyethylene 

Terephthalate Film, Sheet and Strip 

From India: Rescission, In Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 77 FR 3730 (January 25, 2012). 

Jindal, Polyplex, and SRF remain 

subject to this review. The preliminary 

results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review are currently due 

April 1, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall issue preliminary 

results in an administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the order for which the 

administrative review was requested. 

However, if the Department determines 

that it is not practicable to complete the 

preliminary results of the review within 

the aforementioned time limit, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2) allow the Department to 

extend the 245-day period to 365 days. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), we 

determine that it is not practicable to 

complete the preliminary results of this 

review within the original time limit. 

The Department needs additional time 

to analyze the extensive sales and cost 

questionnaire responses that were 

submitted, and we must issue additional 

supplemental questionnaires. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 

of the Act, the Department has decided 

to extend the time limit for the 

preliminary results from 245 days to 365 

days. The preliminary results will now 

be due no later than July 30, 2012. 

Unless extended, the final results 

continue to be due 120 days after the 

publication of the preliminary results, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1). 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 6, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5894 Filed 3–9–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–816] 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products From the Republic 

of Korea: Notice of Final Results of the 

2009–2010 Administrative Review and 

Revocation, in Part 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 6, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review for certain 

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat 

products (CORE) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea).1 This review covers eight 

manufacturers and/or exporters 

(collectively, the respondents) of the 

subject merchandise: LG Chem., Ltd. 

(LG Chem); Haewon MSC Co. Ltd. 

(Haewon); Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd., 

(Dongbu); Hyundai HYSCO (HYSCO); 

Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. (POSCO) 

and Pohang Coated Steel Co., Ltd. 

(POCOS) (collectively, POSCO); 

Dongkuk Industries Co., Ltd. (Dongkuk); 

LG Hausys, Ltd. (Hausys); and Union 

Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Union).2

The period of review (POR) is August 1, 

2009, through, July 31, 2010. 

As a result of our analysis of the 

comments received, these final results 

differ from the Preliminary Results. For 

our final results, we find that Union and 

Dongbu made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

(NV), and POSCO and HYSCO have not 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than NV. In addition, based on the 

final results for the respondents selected 

for individual review, we have 

determined a weighted-average margin 

for those companies that were not 

selected for individual review. Further, 

the Department has determined to 

revoke this antidumping duty order, in 

part, with respect to entries from 

POSCO. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 12, 2012. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES