alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To whom it may concern, 

I, Anthony Ford, co-owner of Tourmax, LCC, am writing pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. 

11, be exempt from the Federal Aviation Regulations as specified and seek exemption from the 

requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 

333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). 

This exemption request will permit Anthony Ford, as the owner and operator of Unmanned Aircraft 

System's (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of real estate, 

perform home and or business exterior inspections, agricultural inspections, and general photography for 

the business titled: Tourmax, LLC; a company that provides photography services for realtors, brokers and 

homebuilders. 

I as the sole operator of the named UAS vehicles, consisting of a DJI Phantom 3 UAS, and its use will be 

for commercial photography and video for hire, namely, Real Estate Photography, home and or business 

exterior inspections, events and to increase public knowledge of UAS and promote safe UAS operations, 

land and survey appraisals, and agricultural assessments on local farms as needed. 

The above mentioned aircraft is GPS assisted for location based information, and include a “Return to 

Home” safety feature in case of signal loss. I will perform all pre-flight and post- flight checks, and 

system/vehicle maintenance. All flights will be L.O.S. And will have a spotter as needed. All flights will 

maintain less than 400' A.G.L. The Phantom 3 weighs 3 pounds. It is battery operated, which are quieter as 

not to disrupt surrounding neighbors and businesses. The aircraft also has a safety feature in the software 

which will not allow it to spool up the motors if within a certain distance of Class A/B/C, etc.... airports. 

The use of this aircraft is financially viable as the cost to the consumer is much less than hiring a full size 

aircraft and pilot. The aircraft is also safer and can access areas a full size aircraft can't. For home 

inspections, it also allows a total roof inspection without the need of ladders and harnesses, which also 

creates a safer and less costly option to the client. 

Thank you very much for your consideration and I look forward to your response. Sincerely, 

Anthony	Ford

Tourmax,	LLC

783	Peach	Lane

Burleson,	TX	76028
On June 6, 2013, Victor W ick lund, Manager, Propulsion & Mechanical Systems, ANM - 112, FAA

Transport Airplane Directorate Standards Staff, contacted Boeing to clarify whether a 3 -year full - compliance time provided for the 767 applies to the 737, 747 and 777 airplane models as we ll.
#### Luis Valle, Respondent, v George Blackwell (MVAIC), Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered June 29, 1990 which, following a nonjury trial on a framed issue, determined that plaintiff was not the victim of an intentional tort and directed the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC) to pay plaintiff $10,000, reversed, on the law, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint granted, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant dismissing the complaint.

Plaintiff Valle was injured on October 19, 1985 when he was struck by an uninsured van driven by the defendant George Blackwell. Plaintiff, acting as a good Samaritan, had interceded in an argument between defendant Blackwell and a woman, Marie Ellis. Thereafter, as plaintiff and the woman were crossing East 166th Street in Bronx County, both were struck by the van. Plaintiff was severely injured.

Subsequent to the occurrence, defendant Blackwell was convicted of two counts of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [1]) for the striking of plaintiff Valle and Ms. Ellis. Section 120.10 (1) of the Penal Law states that a person is guilty of assault in the first degree when "[w]ith intent to cause serious physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument”. The finding of intent in the criminal action precludes a finding here that the act was the result of an accident rather than intent. *(D’Arata v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*76 NY2d 659 [1990].) Plaintiff could recover here only if the act had been caused by an accident rather than by an intentional act. (Insurance Law art 52.)

Accordingly, we reverse. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cutter & Buck Inc. ("the Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2004 ("the Report"), I, Ernest R. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| |  | /s/ERNEST R. JOHNSONErnest R. Johnson Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

61

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 21.1**

**DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC**. -****

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

Pharma Labs Rx, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Herbal Health Products, Inc.,a Florida corporation 

Dynamic Life Products, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Online Meds Rx, Inc., a Florida corporation, and its subsidiary, Dynamic Financial Consultants, LLC, a Florida limited liability company 

Bryan Capital Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership 

Pharma Labs Rx, Inc., a Nevada corporation 

Bob O’Leary Health Food Distributor Co., Inc., a Commonwealth of Pennsylvania corporation 

Dynamic Marketing I, Inc., a Florida corporation 

DYHP Acquisitions, Inc., a Florida corporation
Exhibit 31.2    CERTIFICATION   I, Jack Wagenti, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  August 18, 2006    /s/ Jack WagentiJack Wagenti(Secretary, Treasurer, and Director)
#### Gary PRIOR, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 86-3114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

June 1, 1988.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that he was sentenced pursuant to a scoresheet never adopted as law by the legislature and that the proper scoresheet would have resulted in less points and a lower sentence range. Appellee concedes error.

Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing using the proper scoresheet. Otherwise, affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER and HALL, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



June 21, 2007



Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W

Washington, D.C. 20549



Ladies and Gentlemen:



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Telecom Italia S.p.A. Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006, (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Carlo Orazio Buora, the Executive Deputy Chairman and Riccardo Ruggiero, the Chief Executive Officer, and Enrico Parazzini, the Chief Financial
Officer, of Telecom Italia S.p.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telecom Italia S.p.A.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/  CARLO ORAZIO BUORAName:

Carlo Orazio Buora Executive Deputy Chairman/s/    RICCARDO RUGGIEROName:

Riccardo Ruggiero Chief Executive Officer/s/    ENRICO PARAZZININame:

Enrico Parazzini Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


BAYING ECOLOGICAL HOLDING GROUP INC.


FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Parsh Patel, am the Chief Executive Officer of Baying Ecological Holding Group Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






July 31, 2014
By:
/s/ Parsh PatelParsh PatelPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2266 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration 

systems. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS WITH A CARGO 

4 STORAGE FROM 1401 TO 2200 CUBIC INCHES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2266 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Insulated hydration systems 

with an outer surface of textile materials whose interior 

incorporates a flexible plastic 

container of a kind for storing and dispensing potable 

beverages through attached 

flexible tubing and which 

have a cargo storage capacity 

from 1401 through 2200 

cubic inches (provided for in 

subheading 4202.92.30) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit10.1.2**

 

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

** EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM A. SANGER**

 

THIS AMENDMENT (“***Amendment***”),effective on the 12th day of March, 2009, is made by and between EmergencyMedical Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“***EMSC***”),and William A. Sanger (“***Executive***”),in order to amend the Employment Agreement heretofore entered into betweenEmergency Medical Services, L.P. (“***EMS L.P.***”)and Executive, as assigned by EMS L.P. to EMSC on February 10, 2005, andas amended on June 18, 2007 and on January 1, 2009 (the “***Employment Agreement***”).

 

WHEREAS,EMSC and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extendExecutive’s term of employment and to provide a mechanism by which such termcan be further extended.

 

NOW,THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.             Article 2, “Term of the Agreement” shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

 

“This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of five years (the “***Initial Term***”) unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 6 hereof.  Immediately upon the expiration of the Initial Term, this Agreement shall continue for an additional period of three years (the “***First Renewal Term***”) unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 6 hereof.  Immediately upon the expiration of the First Renewal Term, this Agreement shall continue for an additional period of three years (the “***Second Renewal Term***”) unless either EMSC or the Executive informs the other not less than ninety (90) days prior to the commencement of the Second Renewal Term that it does not wish to renew the Agreement, in which event this Agreement shall terminate on the last day of the First Renewal Term, or, if so extended, unless earlier terminated in accordance with Article 6 hereof.”

 

2.             Except as specifically setforth herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement aredeclared by the parties to be in full force and effect without change.

 

*[Remainder of page intentionally left blank.]*

 

----

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, EMSC and Executive have executed this Agreement, in multiplecounterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, effective as of March 12,2009.

 

 

**EMERGENCYMEDICAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

 

 
| By:           | /s/ Todd G. Zimmerman  |                            |
|---------------|------------------------|---------------------------------|
|          | Name:                  |  Todd G.  Zimmerman        |   |
|          | Title:                 |  Executive  Vice President |   |
|          |                   |                            |   |
| **EXECUTIVE** |                   |
|          |                   |                            |
|          |                   |                            |
|          | /s/  William A. Sanger |                            |
|          | William  A. Sanger     |                            |

 

2

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2240 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and accessories of 

measuring or checking instruments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain parts and 

accessories of measuring or checking instruments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PARTS AND ACCESSORIES OF MEAS4 URING OR CHECKING INSTRUMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2240 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Parts and accessories, of instruments and apparatus for 

measuring or checking electrical quantities, specially designed for telecommunications (provided for in subheading 9030.90.88), not including subassemblies containing one or more printed 

circuit assemblies, specially 

designed for telecommunications (provided for in subheading 9030.90.88) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
American Coin Merchandising, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
33-98888 and 333-33106) on Form S-8 of American Coin Merchandising, Inc. of our
report dated February 19, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
American Coin Merchandising, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report
on Form 10-K of American Coin Merchandising, Inc.



                                        /s/ KPMG LLP
                                        KPMG LLP


Boulder, Colorado
March 19, 2001
#### Mary Witsken WILLER, Doing Business under the Trade Name of Joseph P. Witsken Dairy, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 8284.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1940.

Sanford A. Headley and Michael C. Lacinak, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Leo Calvin Crawford and Frederic W. Johnson, both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Upon motion of the appellant, the appellee not objecting, it is now ordered that this cause, United States v. Krechting, D.C., 26 F.Supp. 266, be and the same is dismissed.
CMAQ Input and Output Files for OTR Modeling Domain

Input and output files for 2002 Base Case, 2009 BOTW and 2012 BOTW model runs are 

listed below. Files are available in electronic format for the 12km domain from NYSDEC 

for use with the SMOKE/CMAQ system. Please contact NY DEC (Gopal Sitla at 518-

402-8402) for information requests. The total file size is about 660 GBs.

CMAQ input files – emissions

Premerged and merged annual 2002 BaseB1 emissions (~140 GB)

Premerged and merged annual 2009 BOTW BaseB4 emissions (~140 GB)

Premerged and merged May -September 2012 BOTW BaseB4 emissions (~70 GB)

CMAQ input files – meteorology MCIP3 output files

MCIP3 files for OTC 12km modeling domain from May to Sep 2002 period

File size is about 30 Gb per month

CMAQ input files – boundary and initial conditions BCON and ICON

Boundary condition files for OTC 12km modeling domain from Dec 2001 to Dec 2002

File size is about 14Gb

Initial concentration file is <1Mb

CMAQ input files – photolysis rates JPROC

JPROC files from Dec 2001 to Dec 2002

File size is <1Mb

CMAQ output files – output 2002 BaseB1

Selected CMAQ output files from May 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain

ACONC, dry/wet deposition, AEROVIS and 8h ozone files, total size is about 36Gb

CMAQ output files – output 2009 BOTW BaseB4

Selected CMAQ output files from May 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain

ACONC, dry/wet deposition, AEROVIS and 8h ozone files, total size is about 42Gb

CMAQ output files – output 2012 BOTW BaseB4

Selected CMAQ output files from May 15 to Sep 30, 2002 for OTC 12km domain

ACONC, dry/wet deposition, AEROVIS and 8h ozone files, total size is 36Gb
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Richard P. Dutkiewicz, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of New World Restaurant Group, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Dated: March 26, 2004 |  | By:                                                                                                    |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                      |  | /s/RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZRichard P. Dutkiewicz Chief Financial
Officer
And Principal Accounting Officer

---

QuickLinks