alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The FLORIDA WINDSTORM UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. BOCA GRANDE CLUB, INC., Appellee.

No. 87-229.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Jan. 12, 1988.

*444Christine Rieger Milton and Barry L. Anderson of Mahoney, Adams, Milam, Surface & Grimsley, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Kenneth G. Oertel of Oertel & Hoffman, Tallahassee, for appellee.

ERVIN, Judge.

The Florida Windstorm Underwriting Association (Association) appeals a Department of Insurance (Department) order designating a 12.1-acre tract located in Charlotte County as eligible for windstorm insurance coverage underwritten by the Association. Finding that the criteria set out in Section 627.351(2), Florida Statutes, were met in the instant case, we affirm.'

Boca Grande Club, Inc., applied for windstorm coverage pursuant to section 627.-351(2), as to a 12.1-acre tract located on Gasparilla Island in Charlotte County. An applicant’s eligibility for such coverage requires that the applicant comply with all of the following criteria: (a) windstorm insurance is unavailable, (b) economic growth and development in the county or area is being deterred or stifled, (c) mortgages are in default, (d) financial institutions are unable to make loans, (e) the county or area is enforcing the Southern Standard Building Code or its equivalent and (f) extending windstorm coverage is consistent with state laws, regulations and policies regarding coastal zone protection and comprehensive planning. *See*§ 627.351(2)(c). After a hearing, the Department granted Boca Grande Club’s request for windstorm coverage by adopting in toto the report and recommendations of the hearing officer. The report had concluded that the Boca Grande Club had “successfully met all of the provisions and requirements of Section 627.351.” We have examined the record in the instant case and conclude there is competent, substantial evidence supporting those findings.

This case is clearly distinguishable from *Florida Windstorm Association v. Sunset Realty Corporation,*516 So.2d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), where the Department’s order approving an application for windstorm eligibility of a site located in close proximity to the property now at issue was reversed by this court due to failure of the area to meet *all*of the prescribed criteria of the statute. In *Sunset Realty Inc.,*mortgages *were not*in default in the area in question. In contrast, here a loan given to the Boca Grande Club by The Provident Bank of Cincinnati, Ohio was in default, due to the unavailability of windstorm insurance.

As *all*of the requirements set forth in section 627.351(2) have been met, the order appealed from is AFFIRMED.

JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Annual Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Mark
Shapiro, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ MARK SHAPIRO
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Mark Shapiro
                                                 Senior Vice President and Chief
                                                 Financial Officer

      A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL
PARKING CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR
ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing. This certification is executed as of December 14, 2004.
RICHARD COURT INFO To Whom it May concern at the Third court of appeals 

### the Alfred n Hughs ilrn.t in am corently housed at



### Gatesville tx. I am asking for an extintion for me to file my PDR, because I didnt 

### recieve it from my Lawyer until! it was past the deadline to file.There are two cases, NO.03-13-00333-CR and No. 03-13-00334 CR.


### Thank you,
Richard Gonzales Sr.#1857179

Alfred Hughs unit Rt 2 Box 4400 Gatesville Tx,76597 RECEIVED IN COURTOF CRIMINALAPPEALS JUL 2 9 2015 

### AbelAcoeta,Clerk Page 1 

## 7-ZW

JUL 2 2015 Jhirdcour: FILED IN COURT OFCRIMINALAPPEALS JUL 30 2015 AbelAcosta, Clerk
Exhibit 31(a)





CERTIFICATIONS








I, Michael L. Asmussen, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “report”) of Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc.;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;







Date:  April 30, 2010
By:   /s/

Michael L. AsmussenMichael L. AsmussenDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of
Harry & David Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 24, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: February 7, 2006



By:

/s/    WILLIAM H.
WILLIAMSWilliam H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/    STEPHEN V.
OCONNELLStephen V. OConnellChief Financial Officer and Chief Administrative Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         245,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (33,500)
<INVENTORY>                                    296,642
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               756,916
<PP&E>                                         225,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 976,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          583,112
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   976,933
<SALES>                                      2,368,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,358,285
<CGS>                                        1,826,665
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,826,665
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,718
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,718
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BLUE WAVE SYSTEMS INC., AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND FOR
THE TWELVE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                       198
<INVENTORY>                                      5,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,536
<PP&E>                                           9,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,918
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           137
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,978
<SALES>                                         27,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,351
<CGS>                                           12,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       106
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,023)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)


</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00074

- CR

JERRY LEE EDWARDS, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 202nd District Court Bowie County, Texas Trial Court No. 11

- F

- 0068

- 202

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.O R D E R Appellant Jerry Lee Edwards was convicted of driving while intoxicated, third offense or more, and was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. On September 26, 2018, Edwards’ court

appointed appellate counsel, Butch Dunbar, filed an Anders 1 brief, and on October 3, 2018, Edwards filed his pro se motion for access to the record. Pursuant to Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 321

– 22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014), we are now required to enter an order specifying the procedure to be followed to ensure Edw ards’ access to the record. This order is intended to accomplish that goal. Dunbar advised this Court that on October 9, 2018, he mailed a complete paper copy of the appellate record to Edwards. Allowing a generous fifteen days for that record to be deli vered to Edwards and giving Edwards thirty days to prepare and file his pro se response, we hereby set November 26, 2018, as the deadline for Edwards to file his pro se response to Dunbar’s Anders
brief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
DATE: October 10, 2018

1 See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 73 8 (1967).
Exhibit 23.2



                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8  No.  333-16939)  pertaining  to  the  1994  Incentive  Plan of Clean Diesel
Technologies,  Inc.,  of  our  report dated January 24, 2003 with respect to the
financial statements of Clean Diesel Technologies Inc., as of December 31, 2002,
and  for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 included in
the  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2003.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 24, 2004





<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 214 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 214

  To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit qualifying 
   States to use their allotments under the State Children's Health 
      Insurance Program for any fiscal year for certain Medicaid 
                             expenditures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 12, 2009

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, and Mr. Cardin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XXI of the Social Security Act to permit qualifying 
   States to use their allotments under the State Children's Health 
      Insurance Program for any fiscal year for certain Medicaid 
                             expenditures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children's Health Equity Technical 
Amendments Act of 2009''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR QUALIFYING STATES TO USE CHIP ALLOTMENT FOR ANY 
              FISCAL YEAR FOR CERTAIN MEDICAID EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Elimination of Fiscal Year and Percentage Limitations.--
            (1) In general.--Section 2105(g)(1)(A) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(g)(1)(A)), as amended by section 
        201(b)(1) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 
        2007 (Public Law 110-173), is amended by striking ``not more 
        than 20 percent of any allotment under section 2104 for fiscal 
        year 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, or 
        2009'' and inserting ``a fiscal year allotment under section 
        2104''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Effective as if included in the 
        enactment of section 201(b) of the Medicare, Medicaid, and 
        SCHIP Extension Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-173), paragraph (2) 
        of that section is repealed.
    (b) Modification of Allowable Expenditures.--Section 
2105(g)(1)(B)(ii) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(g)(1)(B)(ii)) is 
amended by striking ``150'' and inserting ``125''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on October 1, 2008, and shall apply to expenditures made on or 
after that date.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                I, Michael J.Thorne, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of DynCorpInternational LLC (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                 the QuarterlyReport of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2007as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “QuarterlyReport”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 the informationcontained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ MICHAEL J. THORNE

Michael J. Thorne

Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 7, 2007 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


China North East Petroleum Holdings Limited, Order of Suspension 
of Trading

March 1, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate 
information concerning the securities of China North East Petroleum 
Holdings Limited (``NEP''), a Nevada corporation with principal 
executive offices in New York and oil drilling operations in the 
People's Republic of China. NEP's common stock is registered with the 
Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Exchange Act'') and is traded on NYSE Amex.
    Questions have arisen regarding the accuracy and completeness of 
information contained in NEP's public filings with the Commission 
concerning, among other things, certain transfers of cash from the 
company's bank accounts to the personal bank accounts of related 
parties.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of NEP.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange 
Act, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the 
period from 9:30 a.m. EST, March 1, 2012, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on 
March 14, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5373 Filed 3-1-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2199 

To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(4-(1-isobutoxy ethoxy)styrene-co4-hydroxystyrene) dissolved in propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on poly(4-(1-isobutoxy 

ethoxy)styrene-co-4-hydroxystyrene) dissolved in propylene glycol monomethyl ether acetate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLY(4-(1-ISOBUTOXY ETHOXY)STYRENE-CO-4- 

4 HYDROXYSTYRENE) DISSOLVED IN PRO5 PYLENE GLYCOL MONOMETHYL ETHER ACE6 TATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2199 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Poly(4-(1-isobutoxy 

ethoxy)styrene-co-4- 

hydroxystyrene) (CAS No. 

199432–82–1) dissolved in 

propylene glycol monomethyl 

ether acetate (CAS No. 

70657–70–4) (provided for in 

subheading 3903.90.50) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2061 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2061

To extend the temporary duty suspension on certain rayon staple fibers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary duty suspension on certain rayon staple fibers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF DUTY ON CERTAIN RAYON STAPLE FIBERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.33 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain staple fibers of 
viscose rayon, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning, 
measuring 1.67 to 16.67 decitex and having a fiber length each 
measuring 20 mm or more but not over 150 mm (provided for in subheading 
5504.10.00)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-98440, 33-98444, 33-98442 and 33-98446 of Checkfree Corporation on Form S-8
of our reports dated August 22, 1996, except for Note 17 as to which the date
is September 15, 1996, appearing in this Transition Report on Form 10-K/A No. 1
of Checkfree Corporation for the six months ended June 30, 1996.
    
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Columbus, Ohio
   
December 9, 1996