alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006196EN.01001301.xml

| 18.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 196/13

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1102/2006

of 17 July 2006

determining to what extent import right applications submitted during the month of June 2006 for certain live bovine animals as part of a tariff quota provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 may be accepted

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1254/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 of 29 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for the application of a tariff quota for certain live bovine animals originating in Romania, provided for in Council Decision 2003/18/EC (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 fixes at 46 000 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Romania which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 fixes at 46 000 the number of head of live bovine animals originating in Romania which may be imported under special conditions in the period 1 July 2006 to 30 June 2007.

| (2) | Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 lays down that the quantities applied for may be reduced. The applications lodged relate to total quantities which exceed the quantities available. Under these circumstances and taking care to ensure an equitable distribution of the available quantities, it is appropriate to reduce proportionally the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

All applications for import certificates lodged pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1241/2005 shall be accepted at a rate of 7,664 % of the import rights applied for.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 July 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 21. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 38.

2

---
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 6, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00047-CR

NO. 14-15-00048-CR

MARQUISE LAWRENCE ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1331214, 1376285

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant appeals two convictions for aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in each appeal which she 

concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Each brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable 
2

grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1978).

Copies of counsel’s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was 

advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se response. See 

Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, 

more than 60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have reviewed the records and counsel’s briefs carefully and agree each 

appeals is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error 

in either record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders

brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds 

for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2171 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2171

    To suspend temporarily the duty on ultra-high molecular weight 
polyethylene yarn measuring not less than 131 decitex but not more than 
                              340 decitex.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on ultra-high molecular weight 
polyethylene yarn measuring not less than 131 decitex but not more than 
                              340 decitex.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE YARN MEASURING NOT 
              LESS THAN 131 DECITEX BUT NOT MORE THAN 340 DECITEX.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Ultra-high          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        molecular weight                                                   31/2011.......
                        polyethylene
                        yarn, measuring
                        not less than 131
                        decitex but not
                        more than 340
                        decitex (provided
                        for in subheading
                        5402.59.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 47 (Friday, March 9, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5837]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

18 CFR Part 806


Review and Approval of Projects

CFR Correction

    In Title 18 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 400 to End, 
revised as of April 1, 2011, on page 118, in Sec.  806.6, (b)(1)(i) and 
(ii) are removed.

[FR Doc. 2012-5837 Filed 3-8-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
U. S. Energy Information Administration | Drilling Productivity Report

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Oil production

thousand barrels/day

 Bakken

0

50

100

Jun

1,074

Mbbl/d

Production

from

new wells

Legacy

production

change

Net

change

Jul

1,094

Mbbl/d

thousand barrels/day

 Bakken

+92 -72 +20

Indicated change in oil production (Jul vs. Jun)

0

50

100

Jun

1,262

MMcf/d

Production

from

new wells

Legacy

production

change

Net

change

Jul

1,285

MMcf/d

Indicated change in natural gas production (Jul vs. Jun)

million cubic feet/day

 Bakken

+93 -70 +23

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

new-well oil production per rig

rig count

New-well oil production per rig

barrels/day

 Bakken

Rig count

rigs

 (80)

 (70)

 (60)

 (50)

 (40)

 (30)

 (20)

 (10)

 0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Legacy oil production change

thousand barrels/day

 Bakken

 (80)

 (70)

 (60)

 (50)

 (40)

 (30)

 (20)

 (10)

 0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Legacy gas production change

million cubic feet/day

 Bakken

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

 Bakken

Natural gas production

million cubic feet/day

0

50

100

150

200

250

0

600

1,200

1,800

2,400

3,000

3,600

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

new-well gas production per rig

rig count

New-well gas production per rig

thousand cubic feet/day

 Bakken

Rig count

rigs

drilling data through May projected 

production through July

June 2014

Drilling Productivity Report

Monthly

additions 

from one 

average rig 

July

barrels/day

June

barrels/day

month over month

Oil

+5

Gas

thousand cubic feet/day

month over month 

+6

Bakken

million cubic feet/day

month over month

July 518 

thousand cubic feet/day

June 512 

510 

505 

thousand barrels/day

month over month

Oil +20 Gas +23

3
# L_2006314EN.01005101.xml

| 15.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 314/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 314/51

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1636/2006 of 6 November 2006 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2368/2002 implementing the Kimberley Process certification scheme for the international trade in rough diamonds

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 306 of 7 November 2006
  )

On page 11, in the Annex:

for:

‘BULGARIA

| Ministry of Economy |
| --- |
| Multilateral Trade and Economic Policy and Regional Cooperation Directorate |
| 12, Al. Batenberg str. |
| 1000 Sofia |
| Bulgaria’, |

Ministry of Economy

Multilateral Trade and Economic Policy and Regional Cooperation Directorate

12, Al. Batenberg str.

1000 Sofia

Bulgaria’,

read:

‘BULGARIA

| Ministry of Finance |
| --- |
| External Finance Directorate |
| 102, G. Rakosky Street |
| 1040 Sofia |
| Bulgaria’. |

Ministry of Finance

External Finance Directorate

102, G. Rakosky Street

1040 Sofia

Bulgaria’.

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2123 

To temporarily suspend duty on continuous action, self-contained, refillable, 

fan-motor driven, battery-operated, portable personal device for mosquito 

repellent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To temporarily suspend duty on continuous action, self-contained, refillable, fan-motor driven, battery-operated, 

portable personal device for mosquito repellent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUOUS ACTION, SELF-CONTAINED, RE4 FILLABLE, FAN-MOTOR DRIVEN, BATTERY-OP5 ERATED, PORTABLE PERSONAL DEVICE FOR 

6 MOSQUITO REPELLENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2123 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Continuous action, self-contained, refillable, fan-motor 

driven, battery-operated, 

portable personal device for 

mosquito repellents (provided 

for in subheading 

8414.59.60) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2012 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triacetonamine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mrs. LINCOLN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

triacetonamine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRIACETONAMINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-piperidinone) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2012 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 5, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00492

- CR

Oscar Mauricio Paredes PEREZ

,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, T exas

Trial Court No. 2016CR10052 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on January 22, 2018 . The appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to February 21, 2018

.

On February 21, 2018 , the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional thirty

- day

extension of time to March 23, 2018 . By order dated February 23, 2018, this court granted the motion and extended the deadline to March 23, 2018. Our order stated, “ THIS IS THE FI NAL

EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED . The Appellant’s brief must be filed by March 23, 2018

. ”

Appellant’s brief was not filed by March 23, 2018. By order dated March 28, 2018, appellant’s attorney was ordered to file a written respon se in this court stating a reasonable explanation for failing to timely file the brief and demonstrating the steps being t aken to remedy the deficiency.

On March 30, 2018, appellant’s attorney filed a written response and third motion for

extension of tim e to file the brief

. In the response, appellant’s attorney initially refers to her

case load but then sets forth extenuating circumstances , notably the hospitalization of her associate attorney, w hich provide a reasonable explanation for the failure to tim ely file the brief. It is therefore ORDERED that the motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief must be filed no later than April 23, 2018. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILLBE GRANTED . If appellant’s brief is not filed by April 23, 20 18, this appeal will be abated to

the trial court for an abandonment hearing, and the trial court will be asked to consider whether sanctions are appropriate. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2).

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief J ustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
Re: Petition for Exemption Dockent No FAA-2012-0847

Daniel Jacquet

A NM-115, Airframe & Cabin Safety to

: William.Ertle, Mark Forseth

Cc

: Linda.Dorey, Scott.C oyne, Vanessa.Geidel

From: <William.Ertle@PATSAIRCRAFT.COM>

To: Daniel Jacquet/ANM/FAA@FAA

Cc: <Vanessa.Geidel@PATSAIRCRAFT.C OM>, <Linda.Dorey@PATSAIRCRAFT.COM>, <Scott.Coyne@PATSAIRCRA F

Date: 08/28/2012 08:38 AM

Subject: Petition for Exemption Dockent No FAA-2012-0847

Hi Dan,

It was good talking with you, and thank you for your help in resolving this issue.

In response to the request for additional information addressing 14 CFR 11.81(h), I provide the following

justification for exercising the privileges of this exemption outside the Unite States:

Customers are purchasing center

‐ aisle air transport jet aircraft (larger than the typical corporate

business jets) for personal and business transportation because they wish to create a flexible product

that can meet the needs of individuals and frequently operate these aircraft outside the United States.

Please feel free to contact me if you need additional information and Thank You for your help

Best Regards

Bill

William J. Ertle II, DER, ASC | Manager, ODA Operations | STC ODA Administrator, Aircraft Interiors |

PATS Aircraft Systems

21652 Nanticoke Avenue | Georgetown, DE 19947

 : 302.253.6180 | Cell: 302.855.0327

 : william.ertle@pa tsaircraft.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Beverly, Appellant.

On the court’s own motion, it is,

Ordered that the decision and order of this court dated April 15, 1991 [172 AD2d 678], in the above-entitled case, is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order is substituted therefor:

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Carey, J.), rendered June 16, 1989, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s assertion that the court, before accepting the defendant’s guilty plea, should have questioned him concerning a possible intoxication defense is not preserved for appellate review and is, in any event, without merit *(see, People v Harris,*61 NY2d 9; *People v Orr,*144 AD2d 391; *People v Suba,*130 AD2d 526; *People v Bryant,*107 AD2d 817).

Under the circumstances of this case, the sentence imposed was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Rosenblatt and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fresh Harvest Products, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Jordan Friedman, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





|                     |                                                                                                  | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                     |                                                                                                  | 
|                     |                                                                                                  | 
|                     | FRESH HARVEST PRODUCTS, INC.                                                                     | 
|Dated: June 14, 2011 | /s/ Michael Jordan Friedman                                                                      | 
|                     | Michael Jordan Friedman
Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman |
ATLANTIC BANCSHARES, INC.

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the Company),
certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert P. Trask    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Robert P. Trask        
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                            
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michelle M. Pennell    
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Michelle M. Pennell        
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Principal Financial Officer