alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of The Hartcourt Companies, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Victor Zhou, Chief Executive Officer, and Rachel Zhang, Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: September 14, 2009
By:
/s/ Victor ZhouVictor ZhouChief Executive OfficerDated: September 14, 2009
By:
/s/ Rachel ZhangRachel ZhangChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Hartcourt Companies, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>



                                                                          3 (ii)


                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                       OF CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

THE UNDERSIGNED does hereby certify that CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), has duly adopted the following amendment
of Article 4 of its Certificate of Incorporation in accordance with the
provisions of ss. 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law:

                Article 4 of the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation
                be, and it hereby is, amended by revoking in its entirety the
                first paragraph of said Article 4 and the following being, and
                it hereby is, substituted in its place as follows:

       "4.      The corporation shall have authority to issue the total number
                of Fifteen Million One Hundred Thousand (15,100,000) shares of
                the par value of $0.05 per share, amounting in the aggregate to
                Seven Hundred Fifty Five Thousand Dollars ($755,000) and of such
                shares Fifteen Million (15,000,000) shall be designated as
                common stock and One Hundred Thousand ($100,000) shall be
                designated as preferred stock."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has issued this Certificate of Amendment of
Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by its Secretary, Charles W. Grinnell,
this 17th day of June 1998.


                         CLEAN DIESEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                         By: /s/ Charles W. Grinnell
                             -------------------------------
                             Director, Vice President, and
                             Corporate Secretary


                                       32
#### George C. Van Tuyl, Jr., as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*David A. Sullivan et al., Defendants, and Theobald Engelhardt et al., Appellants.

*Van Tuyl*v. Sullivan, 171 App. Div. —, affirmed.

(Argued February 29, 1916;

decided March 14, 1916.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 8, 1915, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion by plaintiff for judgment in his favor on the pleadings. The action was instituted by the superintendent of banks of the state of . New York to enforce the statutory liability of the defendants as stockholders of the Union Bank of Brooklyn, an insolvent banking corporation. Some of the defendants have interposed separate demurrers to the complaint. The grounds stated are: *First,*because the plaintiff has no legal capacity to sue, for the reason that (a) suit must be in the name of the hank; (b) in general the statutes attempting to give the superintendent of banks power to bring suits of this character are unconstitutional. *Second,*because the Union Bank is not made a party. *Third,*because the complaint .does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The following question was certified: “Does the complaint herein state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*William G. Cooke*and *Howard O. Wood*for appellants.

*Joseph G. Deane*and *Philip A. Walter*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Seabury and Pound, JJ.
#### Michael F. HUBER and Kathleen Huber, Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. BASIC CHEMICAL SERVICES, INC., Appellee.

No. BT-188.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 1, 1988.

Rehearing Denied March 24, 1988.

*252Dawn Wiggins Hare, of Levin, Warfield, Middlebrooks, Mabie, Thomas, Mayes & Mitchell, Pensacola, for appellants.

Robert P. Gaines, of Beggs & Lane, Pensacola, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellants appeal a final summary judgment entered in favor of appellee. We reverse.

Appellant, Michael Huber, brought this personal injury action against appellee, seeking damages for severe bums he suffered while handling a chemical sold to him by appellee. He alleged, inter alia, that appellee failed to warn him adequately of the dangers of using the chemical. Appellant, Kathleen Huber, sought damages for loss of consortium.

Appellee moved for summary judgment on the ground that appellant Michael Huber admitted in his deposition that, although he was aware of the instruction he received to avoid skin contact with the chemical, he had allowed the chemical to contact his skin and thereby suffered the burns. Appellee relies upon *Talquin Electric Cooperative v. Amchem Products, Inc.,*427 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), to support its position that the adequacy of the warning is immaterial in this case since appellant admittedly was in fact warned to avoid skin contact, failed to heed that warning, and thereby suffered injury.

A distinction exists, however, between the circumstances of the instant case and those in *Talquin.*Here, the record indicates that appellant could present evidence that challenges the sufficiency of the limited warning he received from appellee. According to his deposition testimony, he was not aware of the chemical’s potential for causing injury to his skin even in a diluted state, as in water splashed back from a wall on which the chemical had been sprayed, which was, in fact, the manner in which he was injured. Thus, unlike the situation in *Talquin,*in the instant case, questions of fact remain as to whether the “warning” given by appellee in this case was sufficient to constitute an adequate warning of the dangers inherent in the chemical and of the necessary safety precautions to be taken when using it.

According to *Tampa Drug Company v. Wait,*103 So.2d 603 (Fla.1958):

> Implicit in the duty to warn is the duty to warn with a degree of intensity that would cause a reasonable man to exercise for his own safety the caution commensurate with the potential danger.

As in *Wait,*in this case a conclusion on those questions is a matter for the trier of fact. Therefore, summary judgment was improper in this case.

REVERSED.

BOOTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          97,003
<SECURITIES>                                    50,020
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,600
<INVENTORY>                                     80,744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               314,365
<PP&E>                                          88,997
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,569
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,630
<BONDS>                                        116,129
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     246,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,778
<SALES>                                        210,108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               212,325
<CGS>                                          182,463
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  361,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (4,296)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,598
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (144,622)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,931)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (139,775)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (139,949)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.84)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2**CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO****SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**Amex Card Services CompanyAmerican Express Credit Account Master TrustAmerican Express Issuance TrustReporting Period January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Amex Card Services Company (“ACSC”), awholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (“TRS”), pursuantto the Subservicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of June 1, 2006, between TRS and ACSC,does hereby certify that:1. ACSC performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.3. A review of ACSC’s activities during the reporting period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under my supervision.4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, ACSC has fulfilled all of its obligationsin all material respects under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.5. Maureen Ryan, Catherine M. Hogan, Robert Radle and Stephen J. Bakonyi are authorized to rely onthis Certification in connection with their Sarbanes-Oxley and Regulation AB Item 1123Certifications for the Reporting Period.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 14th day of March,2008.AMEX CARD SERVICES COMPANY     By: /s/ James Bush     James Bush    Chairman and President       By: /s/ Marc Rosenwald     Marc Rosenwald    Authorized Signatory
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-13759

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALVON HICKMON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:20-cr-00381-SCB-CPT-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-13759 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-13759

Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Alvon Jarrel Hickmon in this appeal from his conviction and sentence for possession 

of a firearm by a felon, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, 

supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Hickmon’s conviction and sentence are 

AFFIRMED. 

USCA11 Case: 21-13759 Date Filed: 08/15/2022 Page: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to
the best of her knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                              
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ JUDITH L. BJORNAAS       
|                       |  |  |  | Judith L. Bjornaas           
|                       |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and    
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                       |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 News
    
        Photos

    Week in Photos

    Air Force TV

    Commentaries

    Features

    Art

    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders
    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Fact Sheets

    SECAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library
    
        CSAF Leadership Library 2022

    CSAF Leadership Library 2021

    CSAF Reading List Pre-2020 Archive
    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    CSAF Leadership Library 2023

    CMSAF Leadership Library

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    Adjunct Professors

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Arctic Strategy

    Empowered Airmen

    State Licensure Portability

    Careers

    AF Federal Advisory Committees

    AF 75th Anniversary

    Policy Updates

    AF Content Management

    Contact Us

    AF Sites
    
        Site RegistrationU.S. Air Force LogoAir Force

        Policy UpdatesNewsroomReoptimizationBIOGRAPHIESAF Senior Leaders

    HomeNewsFeatures   Air Power
        
            FEATURES
 
 Keyword:
 Categories RecentOldestTitle A > ZTitle Z > A
 Lines of Effort: Lines of EffortThe Air Force We NeedLethality and ReadinessBuilding Tomorrow's Air ForceFaster and SmarterLocal Priority
 Article Categories Article Categories2011 Appropriations Information2012 Appropriations Information9/11AF Chief of StaffAFAAFA 2012African American Heritage Month 1-15African American Heritage Month 16-29African American History MonthAFSO 21Air Force FamilyAir Force in SpaceAir Force StoriesAircraftAPP Airman VisualsAPP RSSChief Master Sgt. of the AFChief of Staff ArchiveColorado WildfireCommander's Call TopicsCommentariesDignified TransferDiversityDon't Ask Don't TellEnergyEnvironmentalEtchbergerExpeditionary OperationsFeaturesFiscal Year BudgetH1N1Haiti Earthquake ReliefHeritageHumanitarianHurricane IreneHurricane IsaacHurricane SandyMAJCOM NewsMission/TrainingOklahoma Tornado ReliefOperation Odyssey DawnOperation TomodachiPersonnel MattersSafetySecretary of the AFSequestration NewsSexual AssaultSpace/TechnologySports/RecreationSuicide PreventionThrough Airmen's EyesThrough AIrmen's Eyes FeaturesThrough Their WordsTop StoriesTransition GPSWarrior CareWarrior GamesWeek in PhotosWomen's History Month 1-15Women's History Month 16-30
 Tags
 Start and End Date
 Date
 Dec. 10, 2022Service dog helps Airman fight battles back home
        Col. Adam Roberts, 555th RED HORSE commander, practices resiliency each day alongside his best friend and service dog, Porsche.  Quick Links
AccessibilityContact UsEqual OpportunityFOIA | Privacy | Section 508Information QualityInspector GeneralJAG Court-Martial DocketLink DisclaimerNo FEAR ActOpen GovernmentOSI Tip LinePlain LanguageQuestionsResilienceRSSSite MapVeterans Crisis LineCareers
Join the Air ForceAir Force BenefitsAir Force CareersAir Force ReserveAir National GuardCivilian ServiceConnect
            Get Social with Us
            
            Official United States Air Force Website
    Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mandeep K. Taneja, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Mandeep K. Taneja                
|Mandeep K. Taneja                    
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|July 14, 2005
LOG OF MEETING

DIRECTORATE FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES

SUBJECT: ASTM Bassinet/Cradle Subcommittee Meeting

DATE OF MEETING: January 7, 2013

PLACE OF MEETING: ASTM Headquarters

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Patricia Edwards

COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Patricia Edwards, Jonathan Midgett, Doug Lee, 

Suad Wanna-Nakamara

NON-COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Contact ASTM for attendee list

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

Warnings: There will be a new ballot going out that will clarify the warnings with regard 

to font height. 

Removable bed stability requirement: The task group still needs to do more work. The 

back stop is the stability test. In other words, if a product can be misassembled, it should 

be able to pass the stability test. 

An incident product was demonstrated and discussion continued. The task group will 

have wording for the subcommittee to review and consider for ballot at the April 

meeting.

Replacement mattress warning label issue: A proposal was made by Barry Cik to change 

the current warning label. This issue was already raised at the non-full-size crib 

subcommittee meeting. A request was made to look at incident data regarding 

replacement or substitute mattresses. 

Mattress support rod/mattress flatness: This issue has been “transferred” to the bassinet 

subcommittee, due to a decision made during the play yard subcommittee meeting. The 

hazard associated with missing support rods would be a non-flat mattress. A simple way 

to address the hazard is to develop a new definition for support rods and then add a 

requirement in the mattress flatness test to conduct the test with and without the rods. The 

subcommittee agreed to send the following out to ballot:

3.X Mattress support rods/bars, n –components, typically rods or bars, that provide 

added support between the mattress support component and the mattress pad. 

7.8 Segmented Mattress Flatness Test:

7.8.3 For bassinets that have mattress support rods/bars that are not permanently attached, 

remove the mattress support rods/bars and repeat 7.8.1.3 – 7.8.1.9 for single occupant 

bassinets and 7.8.2.2 - 7.8.2.16 for two occupant bassinets. 

Note: Mattress support rods/bars that have been permanently attached to the product do 

not fall under 7.8.3 testing requirements.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Form  10-K of
Residential  Accredit  Loans,  Inc.,  relating  to Mortgage  Asset  Pass-Through
Certificates,  Series 2003-QS8 comprising part of the Registration Statement (No
333-101791),  Series 2002-QS1,  Series 2001-QS17 and Series 2001-QS15 comprising
part of the Registration Statement (No 333-60352) and Series 1995-QS1 and Series
1996-QS2 and Series 1996-QS1,  of our report dated February 13, 2004 relating to
the financial  statements,  which appears in Item 8 of MBIA Inc.'s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2003.  We also  consent  to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated February 13, 2004 relating to the
financial statement schedules, which appears in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We also consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated February
13, 2004 relating to the financial  statements of MBIA Insurance  Corporation as
of  December  31,  2003 and 2002,  and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2003, which is included in Exhibit 99.4 to such Annual Report
on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 26, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the report of Razor Resources Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bing Wong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Sect 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sect 1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ Bing Wong                                    

Bing Wong, 

Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 4, 2006