alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006093EN.01005701.xml

| 31.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 93/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 93/57

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 526/2006

of 30 March 2006

fixing the maximum export refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds for skimmed milk powder (2) provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 28 March 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate to fix a maximum export refund for the tendering period ending on 28 March 2006.

| (3) | The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 28 March 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be 7,00 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1239/2005 (OJ L 200, 30.7.2005, p. 32).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---
Exhibit 10.1


 





 



    	 



    	 



    




 





 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 






    	 



    	 



    




 


 






    	 



    	 



    

 


.
Exhibit 10.155



FPP Whitewater LLC
c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
Boston, MA 02117

September 16, 2002
LSP-Whitewater, Inc.
c/o Cogentrix Whitewater, LLC
c/o Cogentrix Energy, Inc.
9405 Arrowpoint Boulevard
Charlotte, North Carolina 28273
Attn:  General Counsel and Thomas Schwartz
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to a Membership Interests Purchase Agreement by and between Tomen Power Corporation ("TPC") and Fort Point Power LLC ("FPP") dated as of July 1, 2002, as amended, FPP purchased TPC's membership interests in TPC Funding LLC ("Funding"), which held stock in TPC Whitewater, Inc. ("TPC Whitewater"), the effect of which was to indirectly transfer TPC Whitewater to FPP (the "Transaction").  The Transaction closed on September 4, 2002.
Prior to the closing of the Transaction, Funding converted TPC Whitewater from a "C" corporation to a limited liability company (the "Conversion").  The Conversion took place on September 3, 2002.  As a result of and upon the closing of the Transaction and the consummation of the Conversion, TPC Whitewater's name and location changed to FPP Whitewater LLC, c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC, 200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02117.  As such, FPP Whitewater LLC (the "FPP Subsidiary") is the successor in interest to TPC Whitewater under the Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement of LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership, dated as of June 30, 1995, as amended (as amended, the "Partnership Agreement") by and among TPC Whitewater and certain other parties thereto.
Please forward any and all notices and information to which the FPP Subsidiary may be entitled to the following address:

ArtLight Energy Partners Fund I, L.P.
c/o ArcLight Capital Holdings, LLC
200 Clarendon Street, 55th Floor
Boston, MA 02117

Please note that all cash distributions and other amounts to which we are entitled pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement should continue to be sent directly to The Bank of New York as the Depositary Bank until such time as you receive instructions to the contrary from the Depositary Bank (as such term is defined in the Deposit and Disbursement Agreement dated as of March 27, 1998, as amended, among Funding, the Funding Subsidiary and certain other parties thereto).
Please contact us should you desire information to assist you in making the necessary self-recertification of qualifying facility status under FERC's regulations.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 617-531-6307 with any questions.



|Very truly yours,
By:  /s/      Carter A. Ward
           Carter A. Ward
           Vice President
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cc:     LS Power Corporation
          45 Walden Street, Suite 2D
          Concord, Massachusetts 01742
          Attn:  Frank Hardenbergh
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2066 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on p-chloroaniline. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on pchloroaniline. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-CHLOROANILINE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 p-chloroaniline) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2066 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David O'Neill, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Global Electronic Recovery Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Electronic Recovery Corp. for the period ended October 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Electronic Recovery Corp.

Dated: March 2, 2007

/s/ David O'NeillDavid O'Neill
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2008-1243 Directorate ID: 2007-SW-03-AD

Helicopter Model: Erickson Air-Crane Incorporated Model S-64F Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 7 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect cracking in the rotary rudder 

boom or pylon due to fatigue, and to prevent failure from static overload and subsequent loss of 

control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $50,000 for the repair

Labor per Helicopter

(0.75 x $85/work-hour for 

each pylon exterior 

inspection)

(0.5 x $85/work-hour for 

each pylon interior 

inspection)

(0.75 x $85/work-hour for 

each fluorescent penetrant 

inspection)

(40 x $85/work-hour for the 

repair)

$64 per inspection

$43 per inspection

$64 per inspection

$3,400 

Other (Explain) We estimate 30 pylon exterior inspections per year, 4 

pylon interior inspections per year, and 1 fluorescent 

penetrant inspection per year per helicopter.

Total Cost per Helicopter $2,146 for the inspections

$53,400 for the repair

Total US Fleet Cost $15,024 for the inspections

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Kohner
**EXHIBIT      32.1**
** **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) |   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) |   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:                       | /s/                Michael L. Ashner   |   |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                Name: | Michael                L. Ashner       |   |
|                           | Chief                Executive Officer |   |
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triple Crown Media. Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and,
 c)
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    May 15, 2006Signed:
    
    /s/ THOMAS J. STULTZThomas J. StultzPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 29
City of Burlington v Khamnei 

ENTRY REGARDING MOTION

Count 1, Municipal Enforcement (74-7-18 Vtec) 

Title: Motion to Dismiss (Motion 3) 

Filer: Chris Khamnei 

Attorney: Pro Se 

Filed Date: October 1, 2018 

Response filed on 10/15/2018 by Attorney Kimberlee J. Sturtevant for Plaintiff City of 

Burlington 

 Opposition 

Response filed on 10/18/2018 by Chris Khamnei, Defendant 

 Reply 

The motion is DENIED. 

 Defendant Chris Khamnei (Defendant) asks the Court to dismiss the City of Burlington’s 

(City) Complaint for failure to state a valid claim.1 A motion for failure to state a claim may not 

be granted unless it is beyond doubt that there are no facts or circumstances that would entitle 

the City to relief. Colby v. Umbrella, Inc., 2008 VT 20, ¶ 5, 184 Vt. 1 (citation omitted). We take 

all well-pleaded factual allegations in the Complaint as true and “assume that the movant’s 

contravening assertions are false.” Alger v. Dep’t of Labor & Industry, 2006 VT 115, ¶ 12, 181 Vt. 

309 (citation omitted). 

In this matter, the City alleges ongoing violations relating to exterior storage and rental 

of space in the backyard without zoning approval and occupancy without a certificate of 

occupancy. Though Defendant asserts that the violations have ceased, we take as true the City’s 

allegation that the violations are ongoing. Even if the violations are not ongoing, the City can 

bring an action to address prior violations that have ceased. See In re Cote NOV, Nos. 273-11-06 

Vtec, 165-8-07 Vtec, slip op. at 3 (Vt. Envtl. Ct. Dec. 5, 2007) (Durkin, J.) (noting that “remedial 

acts do not make . . . past zoning transgressions evaporate” so “violators who have cured may 

nonetheless be found to owe civil fines for their past violations” under 24 V.S.A. § 4451). And 

 

1

 Defendant also asserts that he is entitled to a jury trial in this matter. He bases this argument on a 

misreading of 24 V.S.A. § 1974a(b). This Court tries civil ordinance violations without a jury. See In re Letourneau, 

168 Vt. 539, 552 (1998); see also Reporter’s Notes, V.R.E.C.P. 3 (noting that proceedings under the Rule are subject 

to applicable provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure but that V.R.C.P. Rules 48-51, which relate to jury 

trials, “would be plainly inapplicable in proceedings as to which there was no right to a jury.”). Defendant’s request 

for a jury trial is DENIED. 

STATE OF VERMONT

SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION

 Docket No. 74-7-18 Vtec
while Defendant challenges whether some of the violations ever existed, this is not yet 

established by the record. 

We conclude that there are facts or circumstances relating to the City’s Complaint that 

would entitle the City to relief. Defendant’s motion is therefore DENIED. 

So ordered. 

Electronically signed on October 30, 2018 at 09:57 AM pursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d). 

_________________________________________ 

Thomas G. Walsh, Judge 

Superior Court, Environmental Division 

Notifications: 

Kimberlee J. Sturtevant (ERN 4778), Attorney for Plaintiff City of Burlington 

Defendant Chris Khamnei 

jteske
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6 

Attn: Dayana Medina 

1445 Ross Avenue #1200 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Re: Domtar A.W. LLC's Supplemental Response to Request to 

Provide Information Pursuant to Clean Air Act 

Dear Ms. Medina: 

Enclosed please find the signed and notarized Affidavit of Annabeth Reitter for the 

follow-up responses submitted to U.S. EPA on September 30, 2014. 

If you have any questions, please call. 

Enclosure 

cc: Annabeth Reitter 

BOSTON 

BRUSSELS 

CHICAGO 

DETROIT 

JACKSONVILLE 

LOS ANGELES 

MADISON 

MIAMI 

Very truly yours, 

~~ 

Mark A. Thimke 

MILWAUKEE 

NEW YORK 

ORLANDO 

SACRAMENTO 

SAN DIEGO 

SAN FRANCISCO 

SHANGHAI 

SILICON VALLEY 

TALLAHASSEE 

TAMPA 

TOKYO 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 

4841-9435-9581 .1 
4813-6833-3342.1 

Annabeth Reitter, being first duly sworn on oath, states as follows: 

(1) I am Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation for Domtar 

Corporation ("Domtar") located at 301 Pointe Basse Avenue, Nekoosa, 

Wisconsin 54457. 

(2) I make this affidavit in support of Domtar's response to the additional 

questions raised by the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

("U.S. EPA") pursuant to Section 114 of the Clean Air Act for information 

regarding Domtar's Ashdown, Arkansas mill dated June 4, 2014, and 

received by Domtar on June 9, 2014 (the "Response"). 

(3) The objections asserted in the Response are authorized by Domtar. 

(4) Domtar has completed a diligent record search and a diligent interviewing 

process with employees who may have relevant knowledge of the 

operations and activities at the Ashdown mill that are the subject of the 

Response. 

(5) To the best of my knowledge, based upon the information currently 

available to Dorntar and subject to the objections asserted in the Response, 

this Response is true, correct and accurate. Domtar reserves the right to 

revise, amend and/or update the Response in the future if Domtar obtains 

additional relevant or responsive information. 

Annabeth Reitter 

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation
Document

PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT




        Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland (the "Department") that:


FIRST:  The charter of the Corporation (the "Charter") is hereby amended by deleting Article 5 of the Charter in its entirety and substituting in lieu thereof the following new Article 5:
ARTICLE 5
Section 5.01. By-laws.  The Board shall have the power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of the Corporation's By-laws and to make new By-laws. The By-laws also may be adopted, altered or repealed, and new By-laws may be made, by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than a majority of the Shares then outstanding and entitled to vote on the matter or such other standard as may be required to approve such action by an express provision of the By-laws as then in effect.  The By-laws may also include other requirements that stockholders must satisfy in order to make such a proposal.


        SECOND:  The amendment to the Charter as hereinabove set forth has been duly advised by the Board of Directors and approved by the stockholders of the Corporation as required by law.


THIRD:  The undersigned acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the corporate act of the Corporation and as to all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned acknowledges that to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, these matters and facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under the penalties of perjury.


        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Executive Officer and attested by its Secretary on this 19th day of November, 2020.



ATTEST:                    PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.






/s/ Jeffrey R. Sprain__________________            By:  /s/ Joel T. Murphy        (SEAL)
Name:  Jeffrey R. Sprain                    Name:  Joel T. Murphy
Title:  Secretary                        Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1948 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1948

           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4-
                         Dimethoxybenzaldehyde.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

  Mr. Isakson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,4-
                         Dimethoxybenzaldehyde.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,4-DIMETHOXYBENZALDEHYDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.56 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,4-Dimethoxybenzaldehyde) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```