Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Notices 14001 

microphones (8518.30), and hands-free 

speaker kits (8518.90). Duty rates for the 

imported components range from free to 

20%. T/IM authority could be granted 

for a period of up to two years. 

FTZ procedures could exempt 

Brightpoint from customs duty 

payments on the foreign components 

used in export production. The 

company anticipates that up to 10 

percent of the plant’s shipments could 

be exported. On its domestic sales, 

Brightpoint would be able to choose the 

duty rates during customs entry 

procedures that apply to cell phone kits 

(duty free) for the foreign inputs noted 

above. 

In accordance with the Board’s 

regulations, Christopher Kemp of the 

FTZ Staff is designated examiner to 

evaluate and analyze the facts and 

information presented in the application 

and case record and to report findings 

and recommendations pursuant to 

Board Orders 1347 and 1480. 

Public comment is invited from 

interested parties. Submissions (original 

and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

following address: Office of the 

Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade 

Zones Board, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Room 2111, 1401 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20230. The closing period for their 

receipt is April 9, 2012. 

Brightwood has also submitted a 

request to the FTZ Board for FTZ 

manufacturing authority beyond a twoyear period, which may include 

additional products and components. It 

should be noted that the request for 

extended authority would be docketed 

separately and would be processed as a 

distinct proceeding. Any party wishing 

to submit comments for consideration 

regarding the request for extended 

authority would need to submit such 

comments pursuant to the separate 

notice that would be published for that 

request. 

A copy of the application will be 

available for public inspection at the 

Office of the Foreign-Trade Zones 

Board’s Executive Secretary at the 

address listed above, and in the 

‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s 

Web site, which is accessible via 

www.trade.gov/ftz. For further 

information, contact Christopher Kemp 

at Christopher.Kemp@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0862. 

Dated: March 2, 2012. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5697 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–802] 

Continuation of Suspended 

Antidumping Duty Investigation: 

Uranium From the Russian Federation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determination by the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) that 

termination of the Agreement 

Suspending the Antidumping 

Investigation on Uranium from the 

Russian Federation (‘‘Suspension 

Agreement’’) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the determination by the 

International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) 

that termination of the suspended 

antidumping duty investigation on 

uranium from the Russian Federation 

(‘‘Russia’’) would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time, the Department is publishing this 

notice of continuation of the Suspension 

Agreement on uranium from Russia. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 8, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Maureen Price or Sally Gannon, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–4271 or (202) 482– 

0162, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On July 1, 2011, the ITC instituted, 

and the Department initiated, a sunset 

review of the Suspension Agreement, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). 

See ITC Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 

539–C (Third Review), Uranium from 

Russia Russia; Institution of a Five-Year 

Review Concerning the Suspended 

Investigation on Uranium From Russia, 

76 FR 38694 (July 1, 2011) and Initiation 

of Five-year (Sunset) Reviews, 76 FR 

38613 (July 1, 2011). As a result of its 

review, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 

752 of the Act, the Department 

determined that termination of the 

Suspension Agreement would likely 

lead to a continuation or recurrence of 

dumping and notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margin likely to 

prevail should the Suspension 

Agreement be terminated. See Uranium 

From the Russian Federation; Final 

Results of Expedited Sunset Review of 

the Suspension, 76 FR 68404 (November 

4, 2011). 

On March 2, 2012, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act, the ITC published its 

determination that termination of the 

suspended investigation on uranium 

from the Russian Federation would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. See 

Uranium from Russia, 77 FR 12880 

(March 2, 2012) and USITC Publication 

4307 (February 2012), entitled 

‘‘Uranium From Russia, Investigation 

No. 731–TA–539–C (Third Review)’’. 

Therefore, pursuant to Section 

351.218(f)(4) of the Department’s 

regulations, the Department is 

publishing this notice of the 

continuation of the Suspension 

Agreement. 

Scope 

The merchandise covered by this 

Suspension Agreement (Section III, 

‘‘Product Coverage’’) includes the 

following products from Russia: Natural 

uranium in the form of uranium ores 

and concentrates; natural uranium metal 

and natural uranium compounds; 

alloys, dispersions (including cermets), 

ceramic products, and mixtures 

containing natural uranium or natural 

uranium compounds; uranium enriched 

in U235 and its compounds; alloys, 

dispersions (including cermets), ceramic 

products, and mixtures containing 

uranium enriched in U235 or 

compounds of uranium enriched in 

U235; and any other forms of uranium 

within the same class or kind. Uranium 

ore from Russia that is milled into U3O8 

and/or converted into UF6 in another 

country prior to direct and/or indirect 

importation into the United States is 

considered uranium from Russia and is 

subject to the terms of this Suspension 

Agreement. For purposes of this 

Suspension Agreement, uranium 

enriched in U235 or compounds of 

uranium enriched in U235 in Russia are 

covered by this Suspension Agreement, 

regardless of their subsequent 

modification or blending. Uranium 

enriched in U235 in another country 

prior to direct and/or indirect 

importation into the United States is not 

considered uranium from Russia and is 

not subject to the terms of this 

Suspension Agreement. 

Continuation 

As a result of the determinations by 

the Department and the ITC that 

termination of the suspended 

investigation would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence, respectively, 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
14002 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 46 / Thursday, March 8, 2012 / Notices 

1See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 

76 FR 67412 (November 1, 2011) (Initiation Notice). 

of dumping and material injury to an 

industry in the United States, pursuant 

to section 751(d)(2) of the Act, the 

Department hereby orders the 

continuation of the Suspension 

Agreement. The effective date of 

continuation will be the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

this Continuation Notice. Pursuant to 

sections 751(c)(2) of the Act, the 

Department intends to initiate the next 

five-year sunset review of this 

Suspension Agreement not later than 

February 2017. 

This five-year (sunset) review and 

notice are in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and published 

pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 2, 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5671 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–552–813] 

Steel Wire Garment Hangers From the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Notice 

of Postponement of Preliminary 

Determination in the Countervailing 

Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 8, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Conniff, AD/CVD Operations, Office 3, 

Import Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, Room 4014, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202– 

482–1009. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 18, 2012, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the countervailing duty investigation of 

steel wire garment hangers from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam. See Steel 

Wire Garment Hangers from the 

Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation 

of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 77 

FR 3737 (January 25, 2012). Currently, 

the preliminary determination is due no 

later than March 23, 2012. 

Postponement of Due Date for 

Preliminary Determination 

Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), requires the 

Department to issue the preliminary 

determination in a countervailing duty 

investigation within 65 days after the 

date on which the Department initiated 

the investigation. However, if the 

Department concludes that the parties 

concerned in the investigation are 

cooperating and determines that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated, section 703(c)(1)(B) of the 

Act allows the Department to postpone 

making the preliminary determination 

until no later than 130 days after the 

date on which the administering 

authority initiated the investigation. 

The Department has determined that 

the parties involved in the proceeding 

are cooperating and that the 

investigation is extraordinarily 

complicated. See section 703(c)(1)(B) of 

the Act. Specifically, the Department is 

currently investigating alleged subsidy 

programs involving loans, grants, 

income tax incentives, and the 

provision of goods or services for less 

than adequate remuneration. Due to the 

number and complexity of the alleged 

countervailable subsidy practices being 

investigated, it is not practicable to 

complete the preliminary determination 

of this investigation within the original 

time limit (i.e., by March 23, 2012). 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

703(c)(1)(B) of the Act, we are fully 

extending the due date for the 

preliminary determination to no later 

than 130 days after the day on which 

the investigation was initiated. 

However, as that date falls on a Sunday 

(i.e., May 27, 2012) and is followed by 

a federal holiday on Monday, May 28, 

2012, the deadline for completion of the 

preliminary determination is now 

Tuesday, May 29, 2012, the next 

business day. 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act. 

Dated: March 2, 2012. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–5686 Filed 3–7–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–828, A–557–809, A–565–801] 

Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings 

From Italy, Malaysia, and the 

Philippines: Final Results of the 

Expedited Second Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2011, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on 

stainless steel butt-weld pipe fittings 

(butt-weld pipe fittings) from Italy, 

Malaysia, and the Philippines pursuant 

to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act).1 On the 

basis of notices of intent to participate 

and adequate substantive responses 

filed on behalf of domestic interested 

parties, and no adequate response from 

respondent interested parties, the 

Department conducted expedited (120- 

day) sunset reviews of these 

antidumping duty orders. As a result of 

these sunset reviews, the Department 

finds that revocation of the antidumping 

duty orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels identified below in the 

‘‘Final Results of Sunset Reviews’’ 

section of this notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 8, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Angelica Mendoza, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482– 

3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 1, 2011, the Department 

initiated the second sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on buttweld pipe fittings from Italy, Malaysia, 

and the Philippines pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act. See Initiation Notice. 

On November 16, 2011, the Department 

received notices of intent to participate 

from four domestic interested parties, 

Core Pipe Products, Inc. (formerly 

Gerlin, Inc.), Ezeflow USA Inc.— 

Flowline Division (formerly Flowline 

Division of Markovitz Enterprises, Inc.), 

Shaw Alloy Piping Products, Inc., and 

Taylor Forge Stainless, Inc. 

(collectively, domestic interested 

parties), within the deadline specified 

in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the 

Department’s regulations. Domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as U.S. producers of a domestic 

like product. 

On December 1, 2011, we received an 

adequate substantive response from 

domestic interested parties within the 

30-day deadline specified in section 

351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES