alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006325EN.01002001.xml

| 24.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 325/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 325/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1735/2006

of 23 November 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 17 to 23 November 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-8559

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES RUSSELL FORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Hiram H. Ward, Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-89-G, CA-95-73-2)

Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 31, 1996

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Russell Ford, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-90-89-G;

CA-95-73-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 1995). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
RAUL DAVID JACKSON #1367898 

William R Boyd Jr Unit 

200 Spur 113 

Teague, Tx. 75860 

Court of Criminal Appeals 

Able Acosta, Clerk 

P.O. Box 12308 

Austin, Tx. 78711 

RE: EX PARTE RAUL DAVID JACKSON 

May 16, 2015 

WRIT NO. WR-73,697-06, WR-73,697-07, WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 

TRIAL NO. W06-00445-K, W06-00448~K, W06-00450-K, W06-00453-K 

Dear Mr Acosta, 

Enclosed please find a true copy of my correspondence that 

I have sent this date by certified mail RRR to Felicia Pitre, 

District Clerk, Dallas County, Texas. 

Please file this correspondence for record in the above-cause 

so that the Court is aware that I am not able to file objections 

to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court 

because the trial court clerk has failed or refused to forward 

them to me in accordance with Rules of Appellate Procedure RU~§~. 

73.4 (b)(2). Thank you. ;:._;: · 

c. File 

~~ECieij~rEto ~~ _ ~f\f Of CRIMIN~t A~lS 

~~CE~V · 

OOUfft Of CArMi 

MAY 

MAY 2·0 1015 

Afc»~ ~oo•, Cr@vi< 
RAUL DAVID JACKSON #1367898 

William R Boyd Jr Unit ' 

200 Spur 113 

Teague, Tx~ 75860 

Felicia Pitre 

Dist.Clerk, Dallas Co. 

133 N. Riverfront Blvd. LB 12 

Dallas, Tx. 75207-4300 

RE: EX PARTE RAUL-DAVID JACKSON 

May 16, 2015 

WRIT NO. WR-73,697-06, WR-73,697..:07, WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 

TRIAL NO. -W06-00445-K, W06-00448-K, W06~00450-K, W06-00453-K 

( 

Dear Ms Pitre, 

On 5/13/15, I received 4 white-card-notices from-the Court of 

Criminal Appeals indicating that they have received and filed my 

habeas applications forwarded from your office. Please be advised 

that I am proceeding pro se and I have not received- a copy of the 

_findings of fact and conclusions of law as required.by Rules of 

Appellate Procedur~ Rule 73.4 (b)(2). 

In accordance with mandamus requirements, I am hereby demanding 

that you perform a mqndatory duty and mail to me forthwith a true 

and correct copy" of the findings of fact and conclusions of law 

that were forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals in this cause~ 

I am further requ~sting a true copy of the Clerk's Summary 

Sheet that was forwarded with said applications. 

Please file-mark and return to me the enclosed copy of this 

correspondence. Thank you. 

c. Able Acosta 

File 

A TRUE COPY
#### Rebecca W. Twine, Appellant, v Mercy Hospital et al., Respondents.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (O’Shaughnessy, J.), dated De*816cember 15, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the allegations in both the plaintiff’s original complaint and her amended complaint fail to state a cause of action. Further, many of the purported claims are, in addition, barred by the applicable Statutes of Limitations. We have considered the plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Fiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.
# L_2007057DE.01002803.xml

| 24.2.2007 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 57/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2007

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 57/28

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1177/2006 der Kommission vom 1. August 2006 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2160/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Bestimmungen über die Anwendung von spezifischen Bekämpfungsmethoden im Rahmen der nationalen Programme zur Bekämpfung von Salmonellen bei Geflügel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 2. August 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 2. August 2006

Seite 4, Erwägungsgrund 14:

anstatt:

„Der Klarheit halber ist es angezeigt, die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2160/2003 aufzuheben ...“

muss es heißen:

„Der Klarheit halber ist es angezeigt, die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1091/2005 aufzuheben ...“.

---
# L_2008052EN.01002801.xml

| 27.2.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 52/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 52/28

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 of 29 June 2006 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards sugar production in excess of the quota

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 176 of 30 June 2006
  )

On page 31, in the Annex:

for:

| ‘ex 38 | Miscellaneous chemical products except those of headings 3809 60 and 3824 60 00 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘ex 38

Miscellaneous chemical products except those of headings 3809 60 and 3824 60 00 ’

read:

| ‘ex 38 | Miscellaneous chemical products except those of headings 3809 and 3824 60 00 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘ex 38

Miscellaneous chemical products except those of headings 3809 and 3824 60 00 ’

---
Mr.  Nick Parsons 

Environmental  Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/CCGEPA  Denver (Region 8)  

In  Re Docket ID:  EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505 

Dear Mr. Parsons: 

As a concerned citizen, mother and grandmother, I implore you to seriously and intelligently consider the 

impacts to air quality and the public health consequences of oil drilling on the Colorado Plateau.  It’s time, long 

overdue in fact, that people’s well-being take priority over profits.  Our responsibility to protect extends to the 

earth we live on as well.   

  

I can’t speak scientifically, but I speak from my heart when I tell you that I and my loved ones suffer from the air 

we breathe.  Unfortunately, we cannot choose another source of air.  We can only ask those who can make a 

difference to stop further pollution and start taking measures to clean up our environment.   

  

Thank you for your earnest consideration. 

  

Sincerely, 

Lori Henderson 

177 E. Rolling Hills Drive 

Centerville, UT 84014 

  

  

  

Re Docket ID: EPA-HQ-Oq-2010-0505

Lori Henderson 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 05:53 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8334.h... 8/9/2010
|   | (1) |   | The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for                  the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                           |                                                                                        |                       |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                           | **VALLEY FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant)                                   |
|                           |                                                                                        |                       |
| Dated: May 15, 2007  | By:                                                                               | /s/ Louis J. Brothers |
|                           | Louis J. Brothers                                                                           |
|                           | President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer)(Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Richard P. Dutkiewicz, as Chief Financial Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|February 29, 2008 |  | By: | /s/RICHARD P. DUTKIEWICZRichard P. Dutkiewicz Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

This
certification is furnished with this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issuedour reports dated March 15, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedule and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group Inc. and subsidiaries onForm 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (FileNo. 333-133531, effective April 25, 2006; File No. 333-140791, effective February 20, 2007; File No. 333-142573, effective May 3, 2007; and File No. 333-156663, effective January 9, 2009). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Denver,Colorado 

March 15, 2011
From: "Basu, Pat - FSIS" 

To: 

Cc: "Dearfield, Kerry - FSIS" , "Bennett, Patty - FSIS" , "Goldman, David - Commissioned Corps - FSIS" 

Date: 11/23/2011 10:21 AM 

Subject: RE: Transmission of draft ammonia tox assessment 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hi Norman: 

First, let me apologize for the delay in our response. Both Dr. Patty Bennett and I have reviewed 

the documents you have forwarded us for pre-peer review comments. 

Ammonia can and rarely does expose our Federal employees who are stationed for in-plant 

inspection duties. However, these worker exposure and safety incidents are dealt through NIOSH 

and state health and safety official. Meat and poultry products in Federally inspected facilities 

have been known to be exposed to gaseous or liquid ammonia. However, in most of these cases, 

the product is trimmed and passed, as long as there was no remaining odor or visible signs of 

contamination. 

As mentioned in the document, EPA currently has no RfD established for ammonia. This may be 

of value to us in the future, to determine human food safety in case of product contamination. As 

for concerns with setting a RfC, this is beyond the scope of this Agency’s mandate. Therefore, at 

this time, we have no further comments on the documents you have provided us. 

Thanks for including FSIS in this process. Have a very nice Thanksgiving. 

Pat Basu 

Pat Basu, DVM, MS 

Senior Leader - Chemistry, Toxicology & Related Sciences 

Office of Public Health Science 

Food Safety and Inspection Service 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

1400 Independence Ave. SW 

Mail Stop 3766 

Patriots Plaza 3, Room 9-205 

Washington, DC 20250-6337
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to the best of
his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2009 |  | /s/ CHARLES K. NARANG                            
|                     |  | Charles K. Narang                                
|                     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION

                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON
                      AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES

         For the years ended September 30, 1995, 1996, and 1997

            (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              1995        1996           1997
                                              ----        ----           ----
<S>                                         <C>          <C>          <C>
Primary earnings per Common and
  Common Equivalent Share:

  Net earnings                              $ 9,944      $13,836      $20,205

Shares used in the computation (a):

Weighted average Common shares
  outstanding                                23,058       26,064       26,267
Dilutive effect of Common stock
  equivalents                                    --          173          120

Shares used in earnings per Common and
  Common equivalent share computation        23,058       26,237       26,387

Primary earnings per Common and
  Common equivalent share:

  Net earnings                              $  0.43      $  0.53      $  0.77

Fully diluted earnings per Common and
  Common equivalent share:

  Net earnings                              $ 9,944      $13,836      $20,205

Shares used in the computation (a):

  Weighted average Common shares
    outstanding                              23,058       26,064      $26,267
  Dilutive effect of Common stock
    equivalents                                  --          219          174

Shares used in earnings per Common and
  Common equivalent share computations       23,058       26,283       26,441


Fully diluted earnings per common and
  Common equivalent share:

  Net earnings                              $  0.43      $  0.53      $  0.76
</TABLE>



(a) Reflects the recapitalization, initial public offering of shares, and
    subsequent stock splits of the Company described in Note 9 to the
    Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2126 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on electromechanical ice shavers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

electromechanical ice shavers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTROMECHANICAL ICE SHAVERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.41 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 electromechanical ice shavers) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

7 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2126 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
#### JEROME L. KLEIN ET AL. *v.*JOHN P. TESEI ET AL.

*Mark J. Kovack,*in support of the petition.

*Michael J. Leventhal,*in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 905 (AC 17082), is denied.

CALLAHAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.