alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1


 





COMMON INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE
REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 30283W 30 2 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE CLASS
A COMMON STOCK, $0.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF FTS INTERNATIONAL, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned
and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be
signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER GENERAL COUNSEL COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY (Brooklyn, New York) TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
SEALJANUARY 1,2012FTS INTERNATIONAL, INC.DELAWARERACOPORTE★






     


     


    

 





The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the
face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM–as tenants in commonUTMA – ____________ Custodian ____________ (Cust)(Minor) TEN ENT–as tenants by entiretiesunder
Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN–as joint tenants with right of survivorshipAct ________________________________ and not
as tenants in common(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received _____ hereby
sell, assign, and transfer unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the
capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the
said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated ________________X
X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY
PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”),
THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”)
AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER
OF ASSIGNEE
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2211 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain steam hair straighteners. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. DODD (for himself and Mr. LIEBERMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain steam hair 

straighteners. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN STEAM HAIR STRAIGHTENERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2211 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Steam hair straighteners 

each with removable water 

reservoir, having mechanical 

controls with at least 3 but 

not more than 6 settings to 

control the volume of water 

released from the reservoir 

into the steam chamber (provided for in subheading 

8516.32.00) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2101 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain drive motor battery transducers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain drive motor 

battery transducers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN DRIVE MOTOR BATTERY TRANS4 DUCERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2101 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Drive motor battery transducers (provided for in subheading 8543.70.40) certified 

by the importer for use in 

electrically powered vehicles 

of subheading 8703.90 in 

which an on board gasoline 

engine is used to run a generator that recharges the electric drive motor battery ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2018

No. 04-17-00009-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF BARBARA R. DEAN, DECEASED,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7344

Honorable Homero Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee has requested an extension of time to file a response to appellant’s motion to 

release the supersedeas bond. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s response is due on April 

12, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
RAUL 

### DAVID JACKSON #1367898 

### WilliamRBoyd 

### Jr Unit 200 Spur 113 Teague, Tx. 75860

Court of Criminal Appeals Able Acosta, Clerk P.O. Box 12308 Austin, Tx. 78711

RE: EX PARTE RAUL DAVID JACKSON May 16, 2015

WRIT NO. WR-73,697-06, WR-73,697-07, WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 TRIAL NO. W06-00445-K,**W06-00448~K,** W06-00450-K, W06-00453-K

Dear Mr Acosta,
Enclosed please find a true copy of my correspondence that I have sent this date by certified mail RRR to Felicia Pitre, District Clerk, Dallas County, Texas. Please file this correspondence for record in the above-cause so that the Court is aware that I am not able to file objections to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial court because the trial court clerk has failed or refused to forward them to me in accordance with Rules of AppellateProcedure**RU~§~.** 73.4 (b)(2). Thank you. ;:._;: ·

c. File

# ~~ECieij~rEto**~~**

# _**~f\f** Of

### CRIMIN~t**A~lS**

## ~~CE~V

# · OOUfftOfCArMi 

### MAY 

## MAY2·0

# 1015**Afc»~ ~oo•,** 

## Cr@vi<

### RAUL DAVID JACKSON #1367898 WilliamR Boyd 

### Jr Unit' 

### 200 Spur 113 

### Teague,**Tx~** 

### 75860

Felicia Pitre Dist.Clerk, Dallas Co. 133 N. Riverfront Blvd. LB 12 Dallas, Tx. 75207-4300

RE: EX PARTE RAUL-DAVID JACKSON May 16, 2015

WRIT NO. WR-73,697-06, WR-73,697..:07, WR-73,697-08, WR-73,697-09 TRIAL NO. -W06-00445-K, W06-00448-K,**W06~00450-K,** W06-00453-K

( Dear Ms Pitre, On 5/13/15, I received 4 white-card-notices from-the Court of Criminal Appeals indicating that they have received and filed my habeas applications forwarded from your office. Please be advised that I am proceeding pro se and I have not received- a copy of the _findings of fact and conclusions of law as required.by Rules of

Appellate**Procedur~** Rule 73.4 (b)(2). In accordancewith mandamus requirements, I am hereby demanding that you perform a mqndatory duty and mail to me forthwith a true and correct copy"of the findings of fact and conclusions of law that were forwarded to the Court of Criminal Appeals in this**cause~** I am further**requ~sting** a true copy of the Clerk's Summary Sheet that was forwarded with said applications. Please file-mark and return to me the enclosed copy of this correspondence. Thank you.

c. Able Acosta File

ATRUE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2222

     To suspend temporarily the duty on yarn of carded camel hair.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on yarn of carded camel hair.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. YARN OF CARDED CAMEL HAIR.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.12.26      Yarn of carded      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        camel hair                                                         31/2011.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        5108.10.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE ex rel. Joseph JOHNSON v. STATE of Louisiana, CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT.

No. 87-KH-2379.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Nov. 10, 1987.

In re Johnson, Joseph; applying for writ of mandamus and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 266-434.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.
#### PACIFIC GIANT, INC., Worldwide Link, Inc., and Ocean Duke Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee, and Crawfish Processors Alliance, Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry, and Bob Odom, Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-1254.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 23, 2003.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. RApp. P. 42(b).
#### Joyce Lowe JONES v. Steven D. MULLINS.

No. 58263.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Feb. 9, 1989.

Rehearing Denied March 15, 1989.

Bennie L. Turner, Walker & Turner, West Point, for appellant.

Taylor B. Smith, Threadgill, Smith, Sanders & Jolly, Columbus, for appellee.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lowndes County; Ernest L. Brown, Judge.

Before ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., and PRATHER and SULLIVAN, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and ROBERTSON, ANDERSON, PITTMAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.
# L_2006176EN.01007601.xml

| 30.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 176/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 176/76

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 978/2006

of 29 June 2006

granting no refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds of skimmed milk powder (2), provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds of skimmed milk powder (2), provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 27 June 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 27 June 2006.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 27 June 2006, no refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 June 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---
```

[Federal Register: May 11, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 90)]
[Notices]               
[Page 26202]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr11my10-54]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0064]

 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Proposed Rules Changes

ACTION: Notice of proposed change to the Rules of Practice and 
Procedure of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the following proposed change to Rule 
30A(a) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of 
Appeals for the Armed Forces.

DATES: Comments on the proposed change must be received within 30 days 
of the date of this notice.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the 
Court, telephone (202) 761-1448.

    Dated: May 5, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Rule 30A(a)

    Rule 30A(a) currently reads:
    (a) General. The Court will normally not consider any facts outside 
of the record established at the trial and the Court of Criminal 
Appeals.
    The proposed change to Rule 30A(a) would read:
    (a) General. The Court will normally not consider any facts outside 
of the record established at the trial and the Court of Criminal 
Appeals. Requests to consider factual material that is not contained in 
the record shall be presented by a motion to supplement the record 
filed pursuant to Rule 30. The motion shall include statements 
explaining why the matter was not raised previously at trial or before 
the Court of Criminal Appeals and why it is appropriate to be 
considered for the first time in this Court. Motions filed pursuant to 
this Rule will be granted only for good cause shown.
    Comment: The proposed change establishes a procedure for properly 
presenting a request to the Court to consider evidence that is not in 
the record. The rule requires a party to explain in a motion why the 
Court may consider the evidence although it was not considered 
previously and is not part of the record. The rule also contains a 
standard for granting motions under the rule.

[FR Doc. 2010-11036 Filed 5-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-410

Lower Tribunal No. 08-CF-16911

_____________________________

KENNETH TERRILL MITCHELL,JR.,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County.

Bruce Kyle, Judge.

February 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, MIZE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Matthew R. McLain, of McLain Law, P.A., Longwood, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison C. Heim, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
#### RINKER MATERIALS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The TOWN OF LAKE PARK, etc., Appellee.

No. 87-1100.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Jan. 13, 1988.

Cole Fitzgerald and James P. Garrity of Moyle, Flanigan, Katz, Fitzgerald & Shee-han, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

David P. Ackerman of Gunster, Yoakley, Criser & Stewart, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment except as to appellant’s claim for rescission of a right-of-way deed. We believe that claim was not litigated in the prior bond validation proceedings challenged by appel*447lant and, hence, was not foreclosed by the termination of that litigation against appellant. *Cf. McCoy Restaurants, Inc. v. City of Orlando,*392 So.2d 252 (Fla.1980). Our ruling is limited to the issue of whether the rescission claim is barred by the prior proceedings.

Accordingly, we affirm in part and reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Exhibit 31.1



I, Anthony J. Bettencourt, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Verity, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 7, 2003



|/s/ Anthony J. Bettencourt           
|-------------------------------------
|Anthony J. Bettencourt               
|Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Luis
F. Saenz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Li3 Energy, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Li3 Energy, Inc.





Date:
      November 22, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Luis F. SaenzName:
              Luis
      F. SaenzTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Li3 Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Li3 Energy, Inc., and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.