alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2027 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FRESCOLAT MGA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Menthone Glycerin Acetal 

(CAS No. 63187–91–7) (provided for in subheading 

2932.99.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2027 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Argyle Security Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.




Signed
              on this 15thday of May, 2006
            
            /s/ Bob
              MarbutBob MarbutCo-Chief Executive Officer/s/ Ron
              ChaimovskiRon ChaimovskiCo-Chief Executive
              Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 198 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 198

 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive non-Federal share 
requirements for certain transportation programs and activities through 
                          September 30, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2009

Mr. Sanders (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Transportation to waive non-Federal share 
requirements for certain transportation programs and activities through 
                          September 30, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NON-FEDERAL SHARE REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO TRANSPORTATION 
              PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Definition of Covered Transportation Program or Activity.--In 
this section, the term ``covered transportation program or activity'' 
means a program or activity for which funds are authorized under the 
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A 
Legacy for Users (Public Law 109-59) or an amendment made by that Act.
    (b) Temporary Waiver.--For the period specified in subsection (c), 
the Secretary of Transportation shall waive any requirement that would 
otherwise require a State or local government to contribute non-Federal 
funds toward the cost of a covered transportation program or activity.
    (c) Applicability.--Subsection (b) shall apply with respect to a 
covered transportation program or activity carried out by a State or 
local government during the period beginning on the date of enactment 
of this Act and ending on September 30, 2009.
    (d) Effect of Section.--Nothing in this section prohibits a State 
or local government from contributing non-Federal funds toward the cost 
of a covered transportation program or activity.
                                 <all>
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GERALD NAICO
, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF DELRAY BEACH

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3098

[ July 5, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Thomas H. Barkdull, III , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CA005784XXXXMB

- AD

.

Christopher A. Haddad of Law Office of Christopher A. Haddad, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Lawonda R. Warren, Assistant City Attorney, Police Legal Advisor, Office of the City Attorney, Delr ay Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, M AY and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-40085

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERVANDO CALLEJA-SABINO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:17-CR-797-1

Before HIGGINSON, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Servando Calleja-Sabino has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Calleja-Sabino has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 28, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-40085 Document: 00514618964 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/28/2018
No. 18-40085

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-40085 Document: 00514618964 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/28/2018
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.0

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<PAGE>
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following are descriptions of subsidiaries which are directly or indirectly
owned by the BostonFed Bancorp, Inc .(the "Company"):

Boston Federal Savings Bank. Boston Federal Savings Bank ("Boston Federal") is a
subsidiary of the Company and is a federally-chartered savings bank.

Broadway National Bank. Broadway National Bank ("Broadway National") is a
subsidiary of the Company and is a nationally-chartered commercial bank.

BFD Preferred Capital Trust I. BFD Preferred Capital Trust I is a subsidiary of
the Company and was organized as a common law trust under New York law in 2000.
BFD Preferred Capital Trust II. BFD Preferred Capital Trust II is a subsidiary
of the Company and was organized as a statutory business trust under Delaware
law in 2000.

Diversified Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Forward Financial Company. Forward Financial
Company was acquired by Boston Federal in December 1999. It is incorporated
under Massachusetts law and operates as a subsidiary of Boston Federal.

Elmsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. Ellsmere Insurance Agency, Inc. was acquired by
Broadway National in December 1999. It is incorporated under Massachusetts law
and operates as a subsidiary of Broadway National.

BFS Preferred Capital Corp. BFS Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of
Boston Federal and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real
estate investment trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.

BNB Preferred Capital Corp. BNB Preferred Capital Corp. is a subsidiary of
Broadway National and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as a real
estate investment trust, in satisfaction of Section 858 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.

BFS Security Corp. BFS Security Corp. is a subsidiary of Boston Federal and was
organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BNB Security Corp. BNB Security Corp. is a subsidiary of Broadway National and
was organized under Massachusetts law in 1998 as an investment subsidiary.

BF Funding Corporation. BF Funding Corporation is a subsidiary of the Company
and was organized under Massachusetts law in 1995 for purposes of funding the
Boston Federal Savings Bank ESOP plan.

Leader Corporation. Leader Corporation is incorporated under Massachusetts law
and is a subsidiary of Boston Federal.
<PAGE>
Connelly Development Corporation. Connelly Development Corporation is
incorporated under Massachusetts law and is a subsidiary of Leader Corporation.
It has been inactive and was closed in 2001.

Connelly Hill Limited Partnership. Connelly Hill Limited Partnership is a
partnership under Massachusetts law. It is owned by Leader Corporation and
Connelly Development Corporation. The partnership is inactive and was closed in
2001.
# BANKGREENVILLE
FINANCIAL CORPORATION

# Exhibit 32        Section 1350
Certifications

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of BankGreenville Financial Corporation (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
          with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                       |  |                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                       |  |                              
|Date:  August 11, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Russel T. Williams
|                       |  | Russel T. Williams           
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer      

|                       |  |                         
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------
|                       |  |                         
|Date:  August 11, 2008 |  | By:   /s/  Paula S. King
|                       |  | Paula S. King           
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Thomas Gish BRUMLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-849.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Dec. 3, 1986.

*234John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Amy Diem, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

HERSEY, Chief Judge.

Appellant, Brumley, was convicted by a jury of second degree arson. Adjudication was withheld and appellant was sentenced to a term of probation. He raises six issues in his appeal from that conviction and sentence, only two of which merit comment.

One of appellant’s points on appeal is that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support the jury verdict. The rule is that a jury verdict will not be disturbed on this ground if the record contains substantial competent evidence of all facts essential to the verdict. *See Miles v. State,*160 Fla. 523, 36 So.2d 182 (1948). Competent .evidence is matter probative of the fact to be proved; that is, relevant evidence that does not fit within any rule of exclusion. Evidence is substantial if a reasonable mind might accept it to support a conclusion. *Id.*36 So.2d at 183. We conclude that the jury verdict is supported by substantial competent evidence.

The second point that warrants discussion is the trial court’s failure to conduct a *Richardson*inquiry *(Richardson v. State,*246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971)) before excluding defense evidence based upon a discovery violation. Photographs (taken before the fire) of the structure involved in the arson, offered in evidence by defense counsel, were excluded upon an objection based upon failure to disclose. The court made only preliminary inquiry and did not consider whether prejudice had occurred.

The excluded evidence was barely probative and was, at best, cumulative. The failure to make adequate inquiry, however, forestalls application of the harmless error statute, although we find that the error was harmless beyond any reasonable doubt. As we did in *Carroll v. State,*414 So.2d 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), *rev. denied,*426 So.2d 28 (Fla.1983), we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Because we are granting a new trial, we do not address appellant’s first point on appeal except to suggest that we have not been persuaded that the special condition of probation is valid.

As we did in *Hall v. State,*477 So.2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), we certify the question (in slightly different wording) to the Supreme Court of Florida as one of great public importance:

> IS A NEW TRIAL REQUIRED WHEN THE TRIAL COURT FAILS TO CONDUCT A *RICHARDSON*INQUIRY WHERE, IN THE OPINION OF THE REVIEWING COURT, EXCLUSION OF DEFENSE EVIDENCE BECAUSE OF A DISCOVERY VIOLATION IS HARMLESS ERROR BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT?

REVERSE and REMAND.

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.
# ATLANTIC BANCSHARES,
INC.

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 as
                    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
                    Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  November 13, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------
|                         |  | Robert P. Trask           
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer   

|Date:  November 13, 2007 |  | By:   /s/  Michelle Monts  
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|                         |  | Michelle Monts             
|                         |  | Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  EXHIBIT  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
THIS  EXHIBIT  SHALL  NOT BE DEEMED  FILED FOR  PURPOSES  OF  SECTION  11 OF THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AND SECTION 18 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR
OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH  SECTIONS,  NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A
PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH  INCORPORATES  THIS REPORT BY  REFERENCE,  UNLESS
SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY INCORPORATES THIS EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 949491
<NAME> VODAVI TECHNOLOGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                       674
<INVENTORY>                                      6,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,766
<PP&E>                                           4,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,333
<BONDS>                                          7,910
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,842
<SALES>                                         47,983
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,983
<CGS>                                           32,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    653
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (331)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                984
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       984
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF
CASH FLOWS QUALIFIED INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          11,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,498
<PP&E>                                           1,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                     712
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,878
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,723
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     39,844
<COMMON>                                           317
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,878
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2218 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2218

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ipconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Dodd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ipconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IPCONAZOLE (2-[(4-CHLOROPHENYL)METHYL]-5-(1-METHYLETHYL)-1-
              (1H-1,2,4-TRIAZOL-1-YLMETHYL) CYCLOPENTANOL).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ipconazole) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```