alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07-0388-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

OCTOBER 5, 2007

______________________________

JUAN ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 227TH DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY;

NO. 90-CR-1294; HONORABLE PHILIP A. KAZEN, JR., JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 12, 2007, Appellant, Juan Roberto Rodriguez, an inmate proceeding

pro se, filed a Petition for Lawful Damages for Breach of Contract. He alleges breach of

a parole contract claim and seeks damages for mental anguish. By letter dated September

14, 2007, this Court notified Rodriguez to provide a final judgment or other appealable
2

order, noting that failure to do so might result in dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.3(a) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. In response, Rodriguez filed a Notice of Appeal. The

cause number he has provided in his documents reflects a 1990 criminal cause number.

Rodriguez did not, however, provide a final judgment or other appealable order. 

This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and other appealable

orders and has no authority to file petitions initiating litigation. Additionally, Appellant has

not provided any authority or documentation that would authorize an appeal from the

underlying proceeding. See Staley v. State, No. AP-75,462, 2007 WL 2622426, at *1

(Tex.Crim.App. Sept. 12, 2007). Consequently, we have no authority to entertain his

complaint.

Accordingly, this purported appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice

Do not publish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000949244
<NAME> ALTERNATE MARKETING NETWORKS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,779
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,244
<PP&E>                                             795
<DEPRECIATION>                                     587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,103
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,691)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,588
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,576
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,049
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,048
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


18 U.S. C. Section 1350


as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 9, 2009
By:
/s/Frank C. SpencerName:  Frank C. SpencerTitle:  Chief Executive Officer





The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc (the “Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 9, 2009
By:
/s/Charles M. HandyName:  Charles M. HandyTitle:  Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-47551, dated March 21, 2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1860 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 16, 2009 

Referred to the Committee on House Administration 

AN ACT 

To permit each current member of the Board of Directors 

of the Office of Compliance to serve for 3 terms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1860 RFH

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TERM FOR MEMBERS OF BOARD 

2 OF DIRECTORS OF OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE. 

3 Notwithstanding the second sentence of section 

4 301(e)(1) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 

5 (2 U.S.C. 1381(e)(1)), any individual serving as a member 

6 of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance as 

7 of September 30, 2009, may serve for 3 terms. 

Passed the Senate November 5, 2009. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,239
<SECURITIES>                                    59,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                       29
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,554
<PP&E>                                           9,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,909
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,974
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,325
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,477
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (28,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.94)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION2 290 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NY 10007·1866



## JUL 2 6 

## 2007 Jared Snyder Assistant Commissioner New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, 141 h Floor Albany, NY 12233
Dear Mr. Snyder:
This is in response to New York's April 5, 2007 State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submittal to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The April 51 h letterindicates it is clarifying the commitments identified in New York'sNovember 15, 1992 Carbon Monoxide (CO) SIP submittal, "CarbonMonoxide Attainment Demonstration- New York Metropolitan Area." Attached to the April5 1 h submittal is a document that is intended to demonstrate that the removal ofa referenceto a limited off-street parking program that is imposed and enforced bythe City ofNew York, will notjeopardize attainment with the CO national ambient air quality standards.
EPA understands that a public hearing was initially scheduled for May 23, 2007, buthad to be rescheduled and was subsequently held on July 17, 2007. Without thepublic hearing record documentation, the April 51 h submittal cannot be determined complete pursuant to the SIP revision completeness criteria found in Title40, Part 51, Appendix V ofthe Code ofFederal Regulations. OnceNewYork submits the public hearing record, which must include a response to comments received, EPA will evaluate the submittal for completeness and approvability under the CleanAir Act.
Should there be any questions associated with this matter, please have your staffcontact Mr. Ra)'!IIond Werner, Chief, Air Programs Branch. Mr. Werner canbe reached at (212) 637-3 6.



# - Walter Mugdan, Director Division ofEnvironmental Planning & Protection

InternetAddress (URL) • http:l/www.epa.gov**Recycl.ci/R~yclabl•** • Printed wfth Vegelable OM Based Inks on Recyded Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 168 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 168

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
compensation to States incarcerating undocumented aliens charged with a 
                  felony or two or more misdemeanors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2009

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Kyl, Mrs. Boxer, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
Schumer, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Specter, 
Ms. Cantwell, and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for 
compensation to States incarcerating undocumented aliens charged with a 
                  felony or two or more misdemeanors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SCAAP Reimbursement Protection Act 
of 2009''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR STATES INCARCERATING UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS CHARGED 
              WITH CERTAIN CRIMES.

    Section 241(i)(3)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1231(i)(3)(A)) is amended by inserting ``charged with or'' 
before ``convicted''.
                                 <all>
```
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D21-3111

_____________________________

DAVID LEMON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Don H. Lester, Judge.

September 6, 2022

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; David Lemon, pro se, 

Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section

As Adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, David C. Burns, Chief Financial Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 3. | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: July 12, 2005



By:

/s/ David C. BurnsDavid C. BurnsChief Financial Officer
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS
BO BB Y RAY WI L EY, Ap pe lla nt,
v.
TH E ST AT E O F TE XA S, Appellee
. § § § § § § No . 0 8- 07 -0 01 96 -C R

Appea l from the Criminal District Court No.2 of Ta rr ant C ounty , T e xas (TC# 1041442D)

O P I N I O N Bobby Ray Wil ey appea ls a judg ment convicting him of delivery of a c ontrolled substance of

less than one g ram. Appe llant was convic ted by a Ta rra nt County jury on J une 13, 2007. Pursuant to his election, Appellant wa s sentence d by the trial cour

t immediately

following the jury ’s ver dict. Appellant plea d “true ” to the enha nceme nts presente d by

the State, and wa s
se nte nc e d to 15 y e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Appellant’s c ourt appointed c ounsel has filed a brief in whic h he has c oncluded that the appea l is wholly

frivolous and without merit. The br ief mee ts the require ments of Anders v. Cal ifo rn ia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.C t. 1396, 18 L .Ed.2d 493 (1967), by prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord demonstrating why , in effe ct, there are no arguable g rounds to be advanc ed. Se e Hi

gh v . S tate , 5 73 S.W. 2d

80 7 ( Te x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W. 2d 68 4 ( Te x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); J ac k so n v . S tate , 485 S.W .2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Ga ino us v . S

tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counse l’s brief ha s been delivere d to Appellant, and Appe llant has not exercised his rig ht to file a pro se brief.-2-

We h a ve c are fu lly

re vie we d th e re c or d a

nd c ouns e l’ s b ri e f, and

a g re e that th e a

pp e a l is wh oll y fr ivo lou s and

wi tho ut m e ri t. F ur

the r, we fi nd

no thi ngin t

he re c or d th a t mi g ht a

rgua bly support the appe al. The judg ment is affirme d.

J une 19, 2008 DAVI D WEL L I NGTONCHEW, C hief Just ice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d C ar r , JJ. (Do Not Publish)
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1887 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Nourybond 276 Modifier. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Nourybond 276 

Modifier. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOURYBOND 276 MODIFIER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of alkene polymers 

with maleic anhydride, 2-(1- 

piperazinyl) ethylimides, 

diisononyl phthalate (CAS 

No. 28553–12–0) and bis(1- 

methylethyl)-naphthalene 

(CAS No. 38640–62–9) (provided for in subheading 

3908.90.70) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1887 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6559** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ANTHONY CALDWELL , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Richard L. Voorhees , District Judge. ( 5:12

- cr - 00015

- RLV

- DCK

- 1; 5:14

- cv 00181

- RLV )

Submitted : August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Anthony Caldwell, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Elizabeth Comerford, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, William Michael Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina ; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United S tates Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Caldwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The o rder is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Caldwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2116 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2116

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Diol #2.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Polycaprolactone Diol #2.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYCAPROLACTONE DIOL #2.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00       Caprolactone-      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        neopentylglycol                                                    31/2011.......
                        copolymer (CAS
                        No. 69089-45-8)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3907.99.01)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Frank McKenney and Ongage Drilling Systems, L.L.C.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00600

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 40091

Trial court: 215th District Co urt of Harris County

Relators OnGage Drilling Systems, L.L.C. and Frank McKenney have filed a petition for

writ of mandamus seeking relief from the trial court’s July 14, 2014 order granting Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Expedited D iscovery. Relators have filed an Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief Pursuant to Rule 52.10, requesting that we stay the trial court’s order pending resolution of their petition.

Relators’ motion is granted IN PART and denied IN PART. We STAY the following portion of the July 14, 2014 order:

“It is further ORDERED that Defendants produce the following devices by end of business on July 15, 2014 to a neutral forensic computer expert, to be agreed upon by the parties:

1. Former

- Employee Defendants’ electronic storage device s that were connected to an INROCK computer between January 1, 2013 and July 14, 2014 or that contained INROCK data; and

2. Former

- Employee Defendants’ personal and business computers used since January 1, 2013 to which the storage devices were attached.”

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10.

The stay is in place pending further order of this Court, but the stay does not prohibit Plaintiffs from seeking electronic discovery, provided that the Defendants are afforded the protections required by the Texas Rules of Ci vil Procedure, In re Weekley Homes, L.P. , 295 S.W.3d 309, 321

– 22 (Tex. 2009), and any other applicable law. All relief not expressly granted

herein is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting indivi dually  Acting for the CourtDate: July 21, 2014