alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Santana, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frederic Berman, J.), rendered on September 6, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and sentencing him to a prison term of 6 years to life, to run concurrently to a prison term of 2 to 4 years imposed under a separate indictment, unanimously affirmed.

In response to a radio call of shots fired from inside 615 West 184th Street, apartment 1, in Manhattan, two uniformed policft officers arrived and positioned themselves outside the apartment door. Before they knocked or announced their presence, an individual inside the apartment opened the door, allowing the officers to see defendant inside, in possession of a plastic bag containing a white powder, later identified as cocaine.

The trial court did not err in curtailing defense counsel’s cross-examination of a prosecution witness regarding whether or not the arresting officer tailored his testimony to meet Fourth Amendment constitutional requirements. Defense counsel was permitted to cross-examine the officer as to the officer’s observations and actions at the time of the incident, as well as his general knowledge concerning valid arrests and seizures. We find that defendant was afforded sufficient leeway to attempt to establish his defense, and that such restrictions as were placed on him by the trial court were reasonable and proper under the circumstances.

Remarks by the prosecutor, on summation, including statements that the officers knew that they could not search the apartment without a warrant, that the "defense of frame is *418the defense of last resorts”, and that the jury should not get "sucked in” by defendant’s arguments, were either fair comment, responsive to defendant’s counsel’s remarks, or not so prejudicial as to warrant a new trial. *(People v Adams,*163 AD2d 318.) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Kassal, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for
the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerMay 12, 2008
EXHIBIT 13.1





[ex131002.gif]





Unit 1  15782 Marine Drive, White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6 Canada

Tel: (604) 536-2711  |  Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John Bovard, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: April 19, 2006





signed John Bovard

______________________________________________

John Bovard, President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Mary Ann THURGOOD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. A. Spencer THURGOOD, Defendant and Respondent.

No. 860073.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Nov. 3, 1986.

Dale M. Dorius, Michael L. Miller, Brigham City, for plaintiff and appellant.

Richard K. Glauser, Salt Lake City, for defendant and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff appeals from a final decree of divorce entered by the Third District Court. As a sole issue on appeal, plaintiff contends that the court erred in modifying the stipulation of the parties with respect to visitation rights. We affirm.

Under the decree of divorce, plaintiff was awarded the care, custody, and control of the parties’ minor children subject to reasonable rights of visitation in defendant. *996At the hearing held on November 19, 1985, the parties read their stipulation into the record. The transcript shows that the parties stipulated that defendant should have visitation every other legal holiday except for the holidays of Thanksgiving and Christmas, which should be divided between the parties. The parties further stipulated that the day of Thanksgiving and the day of Christmas should further be divided between the parties. In addition, the parties stipulated that Christmas visitation on Christmas morning one year should be alternated with Christmas afternoon and evening the next year.

The decree of divorce provides as follows:

> The Christmas and Thanksgiving holidays shall be divided into two sections which shall alternate annually. The first section for Christmas holiday shall be from December 24 at 12:00 noon until December 25 at 12:00 noon; and from December 29 at 12:00 noon until January 1 at 12:00 noon. The second section shall be from December 25 at 12:00 noon until December 29 at 12:00 noon. The Thanksgiving holiday section shall be from Wednesday before from 12:00 noon to Thanksgiving day at 12:00 noon; and from 12:00 noon Thanksgiving day until 12:00 noon on Saturday following Thanksgiving. Defendant shall have the option to choose which of these sections he wishes to have for Christmas 1985 and Thanksgiving 1986.

In her brief, plaintiff makes this statement: “There is no doubt that this schedule is inconsistent with and modifies the stipulation of the parties as read into the record on November 19, 1985.” Plaintiff makes no further comment concerning how the decree modifies the stipulation, or how the decree creates a hardship to either party in view of their stipulation.

The decree is not inconsistent with the stipulation of the parties. Instead, it clarifies the rights of visitation as stipulated. Plaintiff’s point is totally without merit and the decree is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 906 Certification

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company)
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to the
best of her knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 1, 2008 |  | /s/ JUDITH L. BJORNAAS                                                                         
|                     |  | Judith L. BjornaasSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be
retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-0XLEY ACT OF 2002







I, Robert Astore, acting Chief Financial Officer of International Power Group, Ltd., the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Quarterly Report on 10Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 15, 2008



/s/Robert Astore



Robert Astore

(Principal Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Marpessa F. MCNEIL, Appellant.

No. 02-3192.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) May 23, 2003.

Decided June 4, 2003.

BEFORE: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Marpessa McNeil from an order of the District Court that imposed a two-level upward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3 because McNeil abused a position of trust. McNeil, however, agreed to this enhancement by the terms of the plea agreement. So, we will affirm.

McNeil was charged with conspiracy (1) to defraud federally insured financial institutions by fraudulent use of stolen credit information, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1344; and (2) to knowingly and with intent to use unauthorized access devices and access devices issued to other persons in order to obtain automobiles worth more than $1,000 each, in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1029. McNeil signed and entered into a written plea agreement with the government, pleading guilty to the conspiracy count. McNeil now argues that the District Court improperly imposed the two-level sentence increase for abuse of a position of trust. But the plea agreement explicitly states:

> 10. Pursuant to § 6B1.4 of the Sentencing Guidelines, the parties enter into the following stipulations under the Sentencing Guidelines

> c. The offense level is increased by 2 levels because the defendant abused a position of trust in a manner that significantly facilitated the commission of the offense.

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.3.

By signing this plea agreement, McNeil specifically agreed that the abuse of trust enhancement should be applied. McNeil is bound by the stipulation, and we will affirm.
TS-F C12NT

Continuation pages

PMN Pages 8 Section II.A.1.a

- 1 - PMN Page 8 Section II.A.1.a Other Manufacturing Sites

PMN Page 8 Section II.A.1.a Other Processing Sites 

### {

{ }

} ** COMPANY SANITIZED **
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                April 14, 2008 |                                                                                         |                                  |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                           |                                                                                    |                             |
|                                     |                                                                                         | /s/                Anthony J. Merante |
|                                | Anthony                J. Merante                                                            |
|                                | President,                Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                LOGIC WORKS, INC.

                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

                                DECEMBER 31, 1997

Name                                                       Jurisdiction
----                                                       ------------

Logic Works AG (in liquidation)                            Baar, Switerland
Logic Works Australia PTY LTD                              Sydney, Australia
Logic Works Europe                                         London, England
Logic Works GmbH                                           Hamburg, Germany
Logic Works International, Inc.                            Delaware, USA
Logic Works Limited                                        London, England
Logic Works France SARL                                    Paris, France
Logic Works Software Inc. - Logic Works Logiciel Inc.      New Brunswick, Canada
Logic Works Trading Company Inc.                           St. Michael, Barbados
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2182 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2182

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain ion exchange resin powder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain ion exchange resin powder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ION EXCHANGE RESIN POWDER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following:

``      9902.01.00       Ion Exchange resin  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          powder comprised                                                   31/2011.......
                          of a copolymer of
                          methacrylic acid
                          cross-linked with
                          divinylbenzene,
                          in the potassium
                          ionic form, dried
                          to less than 10%
                          moisture (CAS No.
                          65405-55-2)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3914.00.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Donald F. WRIGHT, Respondent.

No. 69731.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Feb. 25, 1988.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and David G. McGunegle and John B. Root, Jr., Bar Counsel, Orlando, for complainant.

John L. Sewell of Gurney & Handley, P.A., Orlando, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding is before the Court upon the complaint of The Florida Bar, the respondent’s guilty plea for consent judgment, and the referee’s report.

The Bar’s complaint set forth the charge that, during a marriage dissolution proceeding to which the respondent, Donald F. Wright, was a party, he was asked, through the discovery process, to reveal any real property sale contracts in which he had an interest. There were two such contracts that he did not divulge in response to requests for discovery. In his guilty plea respondent admits that the contracts were subject to discovery and should have been provided. He admits that his conduct violated the former Code of Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation) and 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law).

*270The Florida Bar asked the referee to accept respondent’s guilty plea and to recommend imposition of the disciplinary measure agreed to therein. The referee accepted the consent judgment and made recommendations accordingly. The consent judgment noted the emotional strain of the contested dissolution proceeding as a mitigating factor.

The referee recommends, in accordance with the consent judgment agreed to by The Florida Bar, that respondent be given a public reprimand. We approve the referee’s report and hereby reprimand attorney Donald F. Wright for professional misconduct.

The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the respondent. Judgment for costs is entered against Donald F. Wright in the amount of $1,113.95, for which sum let execution issue.

It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2085 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on THV. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on THV. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.62 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 THV) is amended by striking the date in the effective col7 umn period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe quarterly report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel C. Sibley,Chief Financial Officer of Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P., the managinggeneral partner of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | /s/ Dan Sibley                    |   |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Daniel C. Sibley                  |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer           |
|                    | Reef Oil & Gas Partners, L.P. |

 

This certification is not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section.  This certification is notdeemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Actof 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.

----
#### John F. Bartleson and Evans Haile, Appellants, v. Charles W. Vincent and George B. Wheeler, as Executors of the Last Will of George T. Ross, deceased, Appellees.

(Supreme Court of Florida, Division A.

July 26, 1905.)

*619Appeal from Circuit Court Alachua County; James T. Wills, Judge.

*Evans Haile,*for Appellants.

*W. W. Hampton,*for Appellees.

Decision

Per Curiam.

The bill in this cause was filed by the Appellees against the Appellants. There was decree for the complainants and the defendants appealed. Decree affirmed.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1999 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain high tenacity rayon 

filament yarn. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

high tenacity rayon filament yarn. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HIGH TENACITY RAYON FILAMENT 

4 YARN. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.06 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 high tenacity multiple (folded) or cabled yarn of viscose 

8 rayon) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1999 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### HATCH AND BAILEY COMPANY *v.*JOHN MALLOZZI ET AL.

*Gerald M. Fox III,*in support of the petition.

*Harold N. Godlin,*in opposition.

Decided March 5, 1998

The defendant Philomena Mallozzi’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 929 (AC 16475), is denied.

CALLAHAN, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.