alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Sandra Marie Lawson JOBLIN v. Lany G. JOBLIN.

No. 92-CA-0654.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 16, 1993.

J. Tyson Graham, Graham & Segrest, Columbus, for appellant.

Jeffrey C. Smith, Sims & Sims, Columbus, for appellee.

Appeal No. 26198 from Judgment dated May 28, 1992; Robert L. Lancaster, Ruling Judge, Lowndes County Chancery Court.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and BANKS and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ.

Affirmed.

PRATHER, P.J., not participating.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
have issued our report dated February 23, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedules included in the Annual Report of New World Restaurant
Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of New
World Restaurant Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-133531, effective April 25, 2006 and File No. 33-140791, effective
February 20, 2007).

|                      | 
|--------------------- | 
|/s/GRANT THORNTON LLP | 

Denver,
Colorado
February 23, 2007

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Hamilton, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), rendered December 17, 1987, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of trial counsel. We find that when considered as a whole, trial counsel’s performance was sufficiently competent to satisfy the defendant’s constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel *(see, People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137).

Since the defendant failed to object to the closure of the courtroom at trial when the undercover officer testified, the issue is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Scott,*134 AD2d 379; *People v Boyd,*64 AD2d 668). Kunzeman, J. P., Balletta, Miller and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2133 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ESTER GUM 10D 25KG BG CHINA. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on ESTER GUM 10D 

25KG BG CHINA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ESTER GUM 10D 25KG BG CHINA. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Glycerol ester of dimerized 

gum (100%) rosin, catalyzed 

with sulfuric acid, softening 

point not less than 104 degrees centigrade, acid number 

3 to 8, (CAS No. 68475–37– 

6) (provided for in subheading 3806.30.00) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2133 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Caicedo, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered August 10, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

None of the defendant’s contentions on appeal alleging improper cross-examination have been preserved for appellate review, since he either failed to object to them, objected solely to the form of the questions, or had his objections sustained by the trial court *(see, People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858; *People v Liccione,*50 NY2d 850; *People v Arrington,*158 AD2d 461). In any event, the defendant’s contentions are without merit.

The prosecutor’s use of a letter from the defendant’s employer to refresh his recollection was not error, since the letter was not admitted into evidence to prove a collateral matter *(see, People v Sellan,*143 AD2d 690; *People v Angrum,*
      *631137 AD2d 539). In addition, it was within the trial court’s discretion to permit the defendant to be cross-examined on his illegal presence in the United States. A defendant who chooses to testify may properly be cross-examined on any "illegal, immoral, or vicious” act of his life *(see, People v Sandoval,*34 NY2d 371, 374). Further, the cross-examination relating to the defendant’s activities as a lecturer for his religious organization was also not improper since this issue was raised during the defendant’s direct examination and the prosecutor’s questions were directed at the defendant’s age and experience and did not impugn the religious beliefs or practices of the defendant or his church *(cf., People v Forchalle,*88 AD2d 645).

The defendant’s contention that the court failed to give a sufficient charge on reasonable doubt is also unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. The charge given by the trial court satisfied the minimum requirements for such an instruction *(cf., People v Sanders,*69 NY2d 860; *People v Newman,*46 NY2d 126). Kunzeman, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and O’Brien, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-82723) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-03109,
333-74783, 333-74785, 333-76657, 333-76659 and 333-86893) of Pharmacia &
Upjohn, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2000, which appears in this Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such report in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (No. 333-30824) of Monsanto Company.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Florham Park, New Jersey
March 17, 2000
EPA Meeting with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency February 7, 2012

EPA Region 5 staff participated in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) UST program’s annual winter meeting. EPA Staff lead a discussion on the EPA’s proposed revisions of the UST regulations. He handed out the document “Comparison Of 1988 UST Regulations And Proposed UST Regulations” dated October 2011 which is on the EPA OUST website.

**Attendees:** EPA

– Mark Restaino, EPA Region 5
MPCA’s UST Program

- Attendee Name Office Location Nate Blasing Duluth Region Jeff Brandon Duluth Region Stan Kalinoski Brainerd Region Bryan Olson Detroit Lakes Region Carey Mattison Marshall Region Kerry Tullis Mankato Region Zach Klaus Rochester Region JoAnne Henry St. Paul Ben Palmquist St. Paul Jenalee Boise St. Paul Derek Pemble St. Paul Mike Ry nders St. Paul Shirley Smith St. Paul Jake Mueller St. Paul Robert Dullinger St. Paul

Michael Wilson Employ ed b y Hennepin

County
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gregory M. Jehlik, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 17, 2006 |  | /s/    Gregory M. Jehlik             
|                     |  | Gregory M. Jehlik                    
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by CFC International, Inc., and will be retained by CFC International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5947]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 12-03]


Sunshine Act Meeting; Millennium Challenge Corporation Board of 
Directors; March 22, 2012

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

TIME AND DATE: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m., Wednesday, March 22, 2012.

PLACE: Department of State, 2201 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20520.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Melvin F. Williams, Jr., Vice President, General Counsel 
and Corporate Secretary via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#03606c71736c7162776670666071667762717a436e60602d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dbd7cac8d7cad9ccddcbdddbcaddccd9cac1f8d5dbdb96dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

STATUS: Meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors (the ``Board'') of the 
Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') will hold a meeting to 
discuss Candidate Country Report for FY2012, the Niger Threshold 
Program, the Zambia Compact and an update on Malawi. The agenda items 
are expected to involve the consideration of classified information and 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge 
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2012-5947 Filed 3-9-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1993 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1993

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reusable fabric cotton bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reusable fabric cotton bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN REUSABLE FABRIC [COTTON] BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Reusable fabric     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        cotton bags                                                        31/2011.......
                        entered with at
                        least one article
                        of bedding per
                        bag (provided for
                        in subheading
                        4202.92.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3




                                  Certification



I, Daniel L. Follett certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on Form 8-K
containing  distribution  or  servicing  reports  filed in  respect  of  periods
included in the year covered by this annual report,  of American  Express Credit
Account Master Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a whole,
does not  contain  any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or omit to state a
material  fact  necessary  to  make  the  statements   made,  in  light  of  the
circumstances  under which such  statements  were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge,  the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and  servicing,  or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual  compliance  statement  included in
the report and required to be delivered  to the trustee in  accordance  with the
terms of the  pooling  and  servicing,  or  similar,  agreement,  and  except as
disclosed in the reports,  the servicer has fulfilled its obligations  under the
servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant  deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum  servicing  standards based upon the report provided
by an independent  public  accountant,  after  conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform  Single  Attestation  Program for  Mortgage  Bankers or similar
procedure,  as set forth in the pooling and  servicing,  or similar,  agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Date:  March 13, 2006

/s/  Daniel L. Follett
------------------------
Name:  Daniel L. Follett
Title: President, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

Subsidiaries of InvestorsFinancial Services Corp.

as of December 31, 2005

 

IBT Trust Company (Canada)

IBT Trust Company (Cayman), Ltd.

IBT Vermont Insurance Co.

Investors Bank & Trust Company

Investors Boston Securities Corp.

Investors California, LLC

Investors Capital Services, LLC

Investors Capital Trust I

Investors Copley Securities Corp.

Investors Exeter Securities Corp.

Investors Financial Services (Ireland) Limited

Investors Fund Services (Ireland) Limited

Investors Holding Corporation

Investors Securities Corp.

Investors Securities Services, LLC

Investors Trust & custodial Services (Ireland) Limited

Investors Trust Holdings

Investors Trust Holdings Limited

Investors Trust Limited

Investors Trust Nominees Limited

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2278 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2278

      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Butyl Ethyl 
                              Propanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Brown (for himself and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on Butyl Ethyl 
                              Propanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUTYL ETHYL PROPANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.92 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Butyl Ethyl Propanediol) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective column period and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2130 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N,N-hexane-1,6-diylbis(3- 

(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-phenylpropionamide)). 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. CORKER (for himself and Mr. ALEXANDER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on N,N-hexane1,6-diylbis(3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenylpropionamide)). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. N,N-HEXANE-1,6-DIYLBIS(3-(3,5-DI-TERT-BUTYL4 4-HYDROXY-PHENYLPROPIONAMIDE)). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.23 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 N,N-hexane-1,6-diylbis(3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy8 phenylpropionamide))) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2130 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
(4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON -

Federal Aviation Administration

14 eFR Part 39

,2-010-1'J-76

IDocket No. FAA-ZO··_u***; Directorate Identifier 201tJ-!'l'M-092-ADI

R1N 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 Series Airplanes

AGENCY; Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the proouc

..,--

fi~Jm-iil,ik

listed above that would supersede two existing ADs. This proposed AD resu Its from

mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

DGAC [Direction Generate de "Aviation Civile} France AD

1992~106-132(B) • '" • has been issued in order- to mandate a set of

inspcctions/modifi,cations which address JARIFAR (Joint Aviation

Regulation! Federal Aviation Regulat'i9n] 25~571 requirements rclaled to

damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluatiQn of structure. ,.,•.•..

--C~

To t-j)b

-.n>o(I •••• _

-II

7r-a~-It

..,.,._ s.-:...{) /

~l-r

~"

10-11-10

o described in the MeAl. I

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

1be proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condili n

The Wlsafe condition is reduced structural integrity of the wings. fuselage. and stabiliz

DA YS AFfER DATE OF PUBLICA nON IN THE FEDERAL REGlSTER). •••"

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6-89)

;

OFFICIAL FILE cOPy
#### STATE OF CONNECTICUT *v.*BRUCE IVERSON

*Louis S. Avitabile,*special public defender, in support of the petition.

*LeonF. Dalbec, Jr.,*assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided April 28, 1998

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 168 (AC 16029), is denied.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology,
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David
A. Husband, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ David A. HusbandDavid A. HusbandChief Financial OfficerMarch 5, 2004
Exhibit 23.02

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-39613)  pertaining  to the 1995  Equity  Incentive  Plan and in the
Registration  Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-98880)  pertaining to the 1995 Employee
Stock  Purchase  Plan,  the 1995  Directors  Stock Option Plan,  the 1995 Equity
Incentive Plan, the 1994 Equity Incentive Plan and the 1983 Stock Option Plan of
Elantec  Semiconductor,  Inc., of our report dated October 22, 1997 with respect
to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Elantec Semiconductor,
Inc.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 30,
1999.

                                         /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Jose, California
December 6, 1999
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-4437

_____________________________

K.E.S., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Coleman Lee Robinson, Judge.

September 14, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Jasmine Russell, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Exhibit 31.2



I, Steven R. Springsteel, certify that:



| | 1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Verity, Inc.; and
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 27, 2003



|                                                                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    STEVEN R.
SPRINGSTEEL                                                   
|Steven R. Springsteel                                                          
|Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer