alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Andrew
Schenker, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boveran Diagnostics,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial


information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such


disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and









5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:
      Aug 19th, 2009
              
              /s/ Andrew
      SchenkerAndrew
      Schenker
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                (principal
      executive officer)
Ross L. Stephenson, Jr., Ponte Vedra Beach, FL — Section 333 Exemption Petition

March 18, 2015 U. S. Department of Transporta.tion Docket Management System 1200 new Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Reference: Stephenson Construction Management, LLC ltr dated 15 Feb
Dear Sir or Madam: In reference to my original request for exemption dated 15 February, 2015, as contained in Docket ID: FAA-2015-0401, I respectfully request the approval to operate the DJI Inspire unmanned aerial system to provide services to consumers interested in aerial data capture in the additional following areas: • Surveying • Marine Photo and Video • Agriculture • Construction • Special Events
Respectfully submitted,

Ross L. Stephenson, Jr. Stephenson Construction Management, LLC 177 Water Oak Drive Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-17029) pertaining to the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan, Employe
Stock Purchase Plan, 1996 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the Non-
Plan Option Grants of Aviron, of our report dated February 14, 1997, with
respect to the financial statements of Aviron included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


Palo Alto, California
March 25, 1997
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triple Crown Media. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and,c)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date:
    
    February 8, 2007Signed:
    
    /s/ THOMAS J. STULTZThomas J. StultzPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2006294EN.01000101.xml

| 25.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 294/1

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1582/2006

of 24 October 2006

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90, as regards the derogation on egg washing

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 2(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 6(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain marketing standards for eggs (2) lays down the criteria for the derogation enabling packing centres to continue to wash eggs until 31 December 2006. A derogation has been granted to nine packing centres in Sweden and one in the Netherlands. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 6(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain marketing standards for eggs (2) lays down the criteria for the derogation enabling packing centres to continue to wash eggs until 31 December 2006. A derogation has been granted to nine packing centres in Sweden and one in the Netherlands.

| (2) | Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 has been repealed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 of 19 June 2006 on marketing standards for eggs (3) with effect from 1 July 2007. Accordingly, the transitional period for egg washing should be extended until that date. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 has been repealed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1028/2006 of 19 June 2006 on marketing standards for eggs (3) with effect from 1 July 2007. Accordingly, the transitional period for egg washing should be extended until that date.

| (3) | Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the first subparagraph of Article 6(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1907/90, the date ‘31 December 2006’ shall be replaced by the date ‘30 June 2007’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 October 2006.

For the Council

The President

J. KORKEAOJA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 679/2006 (OJ L 119, 4.5.2006, p. 1).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 173, 6.7.1990, p. 5. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1039/2005 (OJ L 172, 5.7.2005, p. 1).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 186, 7.7.2006, p. 1.

3

---
FIRST AMENDMENT
 TO
 FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
 OF
 COGDELL SPENCER LP
 Amendment General Partner
 RECITALS
 A.
    
    The General Partner and Cogdell Business Trust II, a Maryland business trust
entered into that certain Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cogdell Spencer LP dated
as of July 18, 2005 (the Partnership Agreement), to set forth their
agreements with respect to the business and affairs of the Partnership.B.
    
    The Partnership Agreement was amended by that certain Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership of Cogdell Spencer, LP dated as of November 1, 2005
(the Existing Partnership Agreement), at which time the Partners amended and
restated the Partnership Agreement in its entirety and set forth their agreements with
respect to the business and affairs of the Partnership.C.
    
    Pursuant to Section 7.3.C of the Existing Partnership Agreement, the
General Partner has the exclusive power, without the prior consent of the Limited
Partners, to amend the Existing Partnership Agreement to, among other things, issue
additional Partnership Interests, in the form of Partnership Units, on such terms and
conditions as shall be established by the General Partner in it sole and absolute
discretion, without the approval of any Limited Partners, in accordance with
Section 4.3 of the Existing Partnership Agreement and, pursuant to Section
7.3.C of the Existing Partnership Agreement, the General Partners shall provide
notice to the Limited Partners of any such issuance.D.
    
    Cogdell Spencer Inc. (the Parent) and the Partnership entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated January 23, 2008, with Goldenboy Acquisition Corp.,
MEA Holdings, Inc., Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc. (MEA), Marshall Erdman
Development, LLC, and David Pelisek, David Lubar and Scott Ransom, in their capacity as
the Seller Representative (the Merger Agreement), pursuant to which the
Company acquired MEA and certain companies affiliated with MEA through merger (the
Merger).E.
    
    In connection with the Merger, the Parent and the Operating Partnership entered
into certain contribution agreements with holders of outstanding MEA common shares,
pursuant to which such holders, if eligible, were offered the right, immediately prior
to the Merger, to contribute their MEA common shares to the Partnership in exchange
for, in lieu of the cash merger consideration, as described in the Merger Agreement,
Partnership Units.F.
    
    Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed
to them in the Existing Partnership Agreement.




---



##### 



Alternative Units Alternative Units Section 8.6 Parent Stockholder Approval Section 8.6
 Exhibit A
 Existing Partnership Agreement
 No Oral Modification
 Governing Law
 [The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
 2




---



##### 



GENERAL PARTNER:
 
 By:Name:Title:
 3
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1989 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1989

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children's wallets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children's wallets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN'S WALLETS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Children's wallets  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        with outer                                                         31/2011.......
                        surface of nylon
                        each valued not
                        over $1.00 and
                        with dimensions
                        not exceeding 26
                        cm x 11.5 cm and
                        with artwork or
                        graphics using
                        cartoon
                        characters or
                        other children's
                        motif (provided
                        for in subheading
                        4202.32.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-60404 Summary Calendar

DEBRA LAMBERT BOLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MISSISSIPPI POWER COMPANY; OSCAR JORDAN, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(1:98-CV-180-GR)

-------------------- December 20, 1999 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Debra Lambert Boley appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissal of her Title VII claims against the Mississippi Power Company, as well as the district court’s order dismissing her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress and all claims against Oscar Jordan, her supervisor at the Power Company, in his individual capacity. On appeal, Boley argues that 1) the district court erroneously dismissed her claims against Jordan on the basis that Title VII does not allow her to maintain an action against him inNo. 98-20276 -2-

his individual capacity, 2) the district court erroneously ruled that a one-year statute of limitations applied to her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and 3) the district court erroneously determined that no genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether Oscar Jordan and/or the Mississippi Power Company committed acts of sexual discrimination against her. Having carefully considered the briefs on appeal and having fully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court properly determined Jordan is not an “employer” for purposes of Title VII liability. As such, the district court properly granted his Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. Furthermore, we find no error in the application of the one-year statute of limitations under Mississippi law to Boley’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. As such, for essentially the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM the dismissal of any individual claims against Oscar Jordan and we AFFIRM the dismissal of Boley’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. We further conclude, upon a full consideration of all summary judgment evidence submitted, the district court properly found Boley failed to demonstrate a prima facie case of gender discrimination as required under Title VII. Accordingly, the district court’s summary judgment dismissing Boley’s Title VII claims against the Mississippi Power Company is AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Chapter 63, Title 18 USC Section 1350 (A) and (B)





I, Barry C. Kaye, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Coates International, Ltd.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








Dated: March 29, 2010


/s/ Barry C. KayeBarry C. KayePrincipal Accounting Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** April 11, 2014
N o. 04

- 14

- 00133

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF N.P. , Jr., et al., Childern, From the 408th Judicial District Court, Be xar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 02931 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding


### ORDER Appellant’s court

- appointed attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. Counsel has informed the appellant of her right to file her own brief. Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.); see also In re R.R., No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 211579 44, at * 4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights). If the appellant desires to file a pro se brief, she must do so within twenty days from the date of this order. See Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. If the appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after the date the appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. It is further ORDERED that the first amended motion to with draw, filed by appellant’s counsel, is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of the court.

_________________________________ Cathe rine Stone, Chief Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court