alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006186EN.01005301.xml

| 7.7.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/53

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1035/2006

of 6 July 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 30 June to 6 July 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 7 July 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 July 2006.

For the Commission

J. L. DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
# L_2007140EN.01005802.xml

| 1.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 140/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 140/58

---

Corrigendum to Council Joint Action 2006/998/CFSP of 21 December 2006 amending Joint Action 2001/555/CFSP on the establishment of a European Union Satellite Centre

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 405 of 30 December 2006
  . Corrected version in
  Official Journal of the European Union L 29 of 3 February 2007, p. 23
  )

The following references are to the publication in OJ L 29/2007:

On page 25 a new point is added:

| ‘11. | Throughout the text, references to Article 2 shall be construed as follows:






  (a) | in Article 5(1) the references to Articles 2(1), 2(3) and 2(4) shall be replaced by references to Articles 2(1), 2(2)(ii) and 2(2)(iii), respectively; |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘11.

Throughout the text, references to Article 2 shall be construed as follows:

(a)

in Article 5(1) the references to Articles 2(1), 2(3) and 2(4) shall be replaced by references to Articles 2(1), 2(2)(ii) and 2(2)(iii), respectively;

| (b) | in Article 5(3) the reference to Article 2(2) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(i); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in Article 5(3) the reference to Article 2(2) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(i);

| (c) | in Article 20, second subparagraph, the reference to Article 2(2) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(i); |
| --- | --- |

(c)

in Article 20, second subparagraph, the reference to Article 2(2) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(i);

| (d) | in Article 20, third subparagraph, the references to Article 2(2), (3) and (4) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2); |
| --- | --- |

(d)

in Article 20, third subparagraph, the references to Article 2(2), (3) and (4) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2);

| (e) | in Article 3(1) of the Annex, the reference to Article 2(3) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(ii); |
| --- | --- |

(e)

in Article 3(1) of the Annex, the reference to Article 2(3) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2)(ii);

| (f) | in Article 5(3) of the Annex, the reference to Article 2(2), (3) and (4) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2).’ |
| --- | --- |

(f)

in Article 5(3) of the Annex, the reference to Article 2(2), (3) and (4) shall be replaced by a reference to Article 2(2).’

---
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION

1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cadence Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cadence) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), each of the undersigned officers of Cadence, hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cadence.

The undersigned have
executed this Certification effective as of November 5, 2010.



/s/ THEODORE R. SCHROEDERTheodore R. SchroederPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ WILLIAM R. LARUEWilliam R. LaRueSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Cadence, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cadence and will be retained by Cadence and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7524** 

RAYVERN EARL GREEN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN M. MCCALL; MICHAEL MCCALL; A. J. PADULA, Warden , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 6:13

- cv - 02486

- JMC )

Submitted : February 25 , 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Rayvern Earl Green, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rayvern Earl Green seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order accepting the mag istrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action against Defendants. Green has also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a motion for a copy of Lee Correctional Institution’s log books. We deny Green’s applica tion to proceed in forma pauperis and his motion for a copy of Lee Correctional Institution’s log books, and we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jur isdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court ’ s judgment was entered on the docket on January 13, 2014
. Green did not file his notice of appeal until October 13 , 2014. * Accordingly, Green’s notice of appeal is untimely. Because Green failed to file a timely notice of appeal or obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his application for in forma pauperis

* Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 270 (1988).3 status and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We also deny Green’s motion for a copy of Lee Correctional Institution’s log books. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 April 21, 2005 Before Hon. Kenneth F. Ripple, Circuit Judge Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge Hon. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge No. 04-2549 Premcor USA, Inc., and the Premcor Refining Group, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants ,

v. American Home Assurance Company, Defendant-Appellee

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 03 C 7377 John W. Darrah Judge.

ORDER The petition for rehearing filed by plaintiffs-appellants on March 22, 2005, is GRANTED. The panel decision issued on March 9, 2005, is amended as follows: Page 2, line 1, after “ . . . Illinois state court case.” insert: “Premcor also argues that AHA had a duty to indemnify it for any liability incurred.” Page 12, insert paragraph as new subpart D: “Finally, Premcor argues that the district court should not have granted summary judgment on the issue of AHA’s duty to indemnify. As the underlying state action remains pending on appeal in the Illinois courts, Premcor is correct—the district court acted precipitously. See, e.g., Outboard Marine Corp. , 607 N.E. 2d at 1221 (“[T]he question of whether the insurer has a duty to indemnify the insured for a particular liability is only ripe for consideration if the insured has already incurred liability in the underlying claim against it.”). Therefore, we reverse the district court’s judgment on this point and remand for either dismissalNo. 04-2549 Page 2

without prejudice of this issue or a stay of the proceedings relating to this issue until the underlying action in the Illinois state court has become final (and any liability is determined).” Page 12, section III, revise last sentence to read: “Summary judgment for AHA on the duty to defend issues was correct. Summary judgment on the duty to indemnify issue was premature, and we remand that issue to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.”
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2006-25857.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 16, 2012.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 8, 2012.                

*Description:*                     Application of Sundance Air Venezuela S.A. requesting renewal of its existing foreign air carrier permit                           ( print page 13683)                        authorizing it to engage in the foreign air transportation of property and mail between points in Venezuela and points in the United States.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2012-5526 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 31.1   CERTIFICATION   I, Peter Toscano, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10Q of International Power Group, Ltd.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  May 21, 2007 /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors)
(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of DynCorp International LLC (the “Company”)for the quarter ended December 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, MichaelJ. Thorne, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(i)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: February 12, 2007 | /s/ MICHAEL J.  THORNE                                        |   |   |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                         | Michael J. Thorne                                             |   |   |
|                         | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |   |
|                         | (principal financial officer)                                 |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DealerTrack Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Mark F. O’Neil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Eric D. Jacobs,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to our knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Mark F. O’NeilMark
      F. O’NeilChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Eric D. JacobsEric
      D. JacobsSenior
      Vice President, Chief Financial and
                        Administrative
      Officer




Dated:
May 5, 2010




A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

LERONE BRUNSON, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 586 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

LERONE BRUNSON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 587 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2015, the Commonwealth’s Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal is HELD pending our disposition of Commonwealth v. Wolfe, 68

MAP 2015 and Commonwealth v. Barnes, 36 EAP 2015, and Lerone Brunson’s Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners  1995-A,  Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         259,680
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  55,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               314,993
<PP&E>                                         3,205,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (915,470)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,605,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,638
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,600,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,605,201
<SALES>                                        350,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               372,632
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  589,792<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (283,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (283,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (283,939)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>