alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3898

___________ Chetty Mamandur; Uma Sunku * Mamandur, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Jimmy Earl Power, Jr.; Prudential * Securities, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 5, 2003 Filed: August 27, 2003

___________ Before RILEY, HANSEN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Chetty and Uma Sunku Mamandur appeal the district court’s 1 order denying their motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award in favor of Jimmy Earl Power, Jr., and Prudential Securities Incorporated. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, and we conclude that the court did not err in not holding an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Burton v. Dormire , 295 F.3d 839, 848 (8th Cir.-2- 2002) (declining to remand for hearing because arguments lacked merit and hearing was legally unnecessary), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 1904 (2003). We also deny the Mamandurs’ pending motion for remand. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest:CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    November 21, 2007      /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer, Principal Operating Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors )
Exhibit 10.5

AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 11 TO SERVICE AGREEMENT("Amendment") is made as of
January 1, 2009 by and between THE HEARST CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation ("Hearst"), and HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Company").

W I T N E S S E T H

WHEREAS, Hearst and the Company entered into a Service Agreement dated as of August 29, 1997 and amended by Amendments
Nos. 1 through 10 (the "Service Agreement"), pursuant to which Hearst provides certain services to the Company; and

WHEREAS,
Hearst and the Company mutually desire to amend the Service Agreement as set forth hereinafter;

NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Service Agreement as follows:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

THE HEARST CORPORATION

HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.By:

/s/ RONALD J. DOERFLER

By:

/s/ JONATHAN C. MINTZERName:
Title:

Ronald J. Doerfler Sr. VP and CFO



Name:
Title:

Jonathan C. Mintzer Vice President, General Counsel andDated:

12/31/08





SecretaryDated:

12/31/08


---



QuickLinks
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2251 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dinotefuran. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Dinotefuran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DINOTEFURAN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.30 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Dinotefuran) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

11 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 194 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 194

   To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to require the 
    Secretary of Agriculture to help offset the costs of intrastate 
transportation, storage, and distribution of bonus commodities provided 
    to States and food assistance agencies under the emergency food 
                          assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 2009

 Mr. Casey (for himself, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Voinovich) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to require the 
    Secretary of Agriculture to help offset the costs of intrastate 
transportation, storage, and distribution of bonus commodities provided 
    to States and food assistance agencies under the emergency food 
                          assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bonus TEFAP Assistance Act of 
2009''.

SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE FOR COSTS OF DISTRIBUTING BONUS COMMODITIES.

    (a) Purposes.--The purposes of this section are--
            (1) to encourage States and food assistance agencies to 
        accept commodities acquired by the Secretary of Agriculture for 
        farm support and surplus removal activities; and
            (2) to offset the costs of the States and food assistance 
        agencies for the intrastate transportation, storage, and 
        distribution of the commodities.
    (b) Costs of Distributing Bonus Commodities.--Section 202 of the 
Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7502) is amended by 
inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Costs of Distributing Bonus Commodities.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall use funds made 
        available under section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 
        U.S.C. 612c), to provide funding described in paragraph (2) to 
        eligible recipient agencies to offset the costs of the agencies 
        for intrastate transportation, storage, and distribution of 
        commodities described in subsection (a).
            ``(2) Funding.--The Secretary shall provide funding 
        described in paragraph (1) to an eligible recipient agency at a 
        rate equal to the lower of $0.05 per pound or $0.05 per dollar 
        value of commodities described in subsection (a) that are made 
        available under this Act to, and accepted by, the eligible 
        recipient agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kam Shah, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WebTradex International Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and




c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: August 16, 2010





/s/ Kam Shah


Kam Shah


Chief Accounting Officer
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Coda Octopus Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
for the period ended January 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
we, Annmarie Gayle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Midgley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated:
May 13, 2019



|/s/
    Annmarie Gayle                                                                                                                                        | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Annmarie
                                         Gayle
        Chairman
        and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal
        Executive Officer)    | 
|                                                                                                                                                              | 
|/s/
    Michael Midgley                                                                                                                                       | 
|Michael
                                         Midgley
        Chief
        Financial Officer
        (Principal
        Financial and Accounting Officer) |
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

228) ll-K- (I) -41 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 228 of 325 

P.1 
P.2 

7 

II-K-(I)-41 

TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILER 

•APPLICATIONS: NO COMBUSTION MODIFICATION. 

A 

Acurex Corporation. 

December 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-41
Exhibit
10.32
 
 th
   Employment
 Duties and Responsibilities
 Extent of Service
 Base Salary
 1




---



##### 



Incentive Compensation
 Stock Compensation
 Retirement and Welfare Plans
 Reimbursement of Expenses; Vacation
 2




---



##### 



provided that
 Termination
 Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason Before A Change of
Control
     3




---



##### 



Stock Options
  
 Termination Without Cause; Resignation for Good Reason After or in Connection With A
Change of Control.
 
 4




---



##### 



5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



Voluntary Termination
 Disability
 Death
 Cause
 Notice of Termination
 Definitions
   7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 Employee Proprietary Information, Inventions and Noncompete Provisions
 9




---



##### 



Acknowledgment
 Survivorship
 Mitigation
 Notices
  th
  
  Contents of Agreement; Amendment and Assignment
  10




---



##### 



Severability
 Remedies Cumulative; No Waiver
 Withholding
 Miscellaneous
 Compliance with Section 409A of the Code
 11




---



##### 



Tax Consequences
 12




---



##### 



Governing Law
 13




---



##### 



NxStage Medical, Inc./s/ Jeffrey H. BurbankBy:Name:  Jeffrey H. BurbankTitle:  Founder & CEOEXECUTIVE/s/ Michael Miller, Jr.Michael Miller, Jr.
 14




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 Proprietary Information,Inventions and Noncompete Provisions
 15
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket N o. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -A D 

Add the work hours, parts cost, and nwnlu:r <l U.S. registered products to the table bel01v. When you are 

f/11ished. click on the ·• Update Fields,. buT/on to auwmaticalzv jill in the totals. 

Update Fields I 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@S85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) P roducts 

Inspection 2.8 0 ) ·H~ Oil 0 ' OQ.J 

t).O' {I (;' LIOO 

00 I) (J;J ) 0.00 " (),()) I).OIJ ' 0 (l:J 

()tl f !/• (I 00 

0 () j I) O•J \ CLOO 

o O'l ) {)t) .., •1 

()() [ ' HI 

.... 0 (J .I ' I). ()\I \ o.on 

(>.0 (}:) ' !) If) 

0.11 ~ (; () 

\ f) (I J ~') 

{1/l '• l. 0.1111 

. )011 . s n 11 n CJO 

\ n: { (J I)(' 

0 ~) • I () l () II() 

s () s I) (), () 00 

I}~ ',!, (1.(}!, 

01 "> '• IJ.ll!, 

~ 0 (. I) o no 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

Costs covered under warranty (ifknOlvn) $Warramy 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

Install missing tie rods 0.6 <!,·' 1027 

lr.lll) ~ !) t; 

' 0 ()ll ~ 0 11(1 

\;, I' 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answ r. ~ 

YES 0 NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
**Exhibit32.2**

** **

#### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, asAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

####  

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofSafety Products Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 29, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, David F.Myers, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  November 8, 2007 | By:    | /s/ DAVID F.  MYERS, JR.                            |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | David F.  Myers, Jr.                                |
|                     |   | Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, |
|                     |   | Secretary  and Director                             |
|                     |   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)       |

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.**

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ICx Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 15, 2008



By:

/s/ HANS C. KOBLERHans C. KoblerChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ DEBORAH D. MOSIERDeborah D. MosierChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to ICx Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by ICx Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Letter Agreement with David J. Harrison regarding Employment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.4.2 
 SYNOVA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. 
 Rose Tree Corporate Center 
 1400 N. Providence Road 
 Suite 6010,
Building II 
 Media, Pennsylvania 19063 
 January 12, 2007 
 Synova Healthcare
Group, Inc. 
 1400 N. Providence Road, Suite 6010 
 Media,
Pennsylvania 19063 
 Attention: Stephen E. King 
  

	 	Re:	Employment Agreement dated February 10, 2005 

 Dear Mr. King:

 We refer you to the Employment Agreement dated February 10, 2005 (the “Employment Agreement”) among
you, Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. (“Group”), and Synova Healthcare, Inc. (the “Company”). Group intends to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger
Agreement”), dated on or about January 12, 2007, with Allendale Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Allendale”). Under the Merger Agreement, Group will add Mr. George Votis to the board of directors. 
 Section 4.5 of the Employment Agreement entitles you to terminate the Employment Agreement in the event of a change in control of the Group or
Company, including certain changes in board composition. In view of the changes in Group’s board composition that have previously occurred and the addition of Mr. Votis as part of the Allendale merger, we are requesting this waiver
of any right you may have to terminate the Employment Agreement as a result of the changes in board composition occurring on or prior to the date hereof and as a result of the Allendale merger pursuant to the Merger Agreement. Your
agreement to the above waiver shall not constitute a waiver of any future rights you may have under the Employment Agreement. 
 Please
indicate by signing below your agreement to the above waiver and return a signed copy to Gregg S. Rivkind, Esq. via facsimile at (215) 832-5769 and the original by regular mail sent to the attention of Gregg S. Rivkind, Esq., c/o Blank
Rome LLP, 1 Logan Square, Philadelphia, PA 19103. Thank you for your assistance with this matter. 






 Synova Healthcare Group, Inc. 
 January 12, 2007 
 Page 2 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ David J. Harrison
	David J. Harrison
	President and Chief Operating Officer


  

	
	Agreed to and accepted by:
	
	/s/ Stephen E. King
	Stephen E. King

 Date: January 12, 2007
# L_2008277DE.01003801.xml

| 18.10.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 277/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 277/38

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1875/2006 der Kommission vom 18. Dezember 2006 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2454/93 mit Durchführungsvorschriften zu der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2913/92 des Rates zur Festlegung des Zollkodex der Gemeinschaften

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 360 vom 19. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 360 vom 19. Dezember 2006

Seite 73, Artikel 14q, Absatz 5, Unterabsatz 4:

anstatt:

„Das Ergebnis der Überprüfung wird ...“,

muss es heißen:

„Das Ergebnis der Neubewertung wird ...“.

---
Aerial Anthropology LLC

DJI INSPIRE1 SPECIFICATIONS
Aerial Anthropology LLC
Aerial Anthropology LLC
Aerial Anthropology LLC