alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Probe Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Quarterly Report for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 15, 2009   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------ John Bennett Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-01103-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E.S., a Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2023PA00055

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Beth Watkins, Justice

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 29, 2024

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED

Appellant A.S. appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her child 

E.S. Her court-appointed appellate counsel filed a motion to withdraw and a brief containing a 

professional evaluation of the record, concluding there are no arguable grounds for reversal of the 

termination order. The brief satisfies the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967). See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing that Anders 

procedures apply in parental termination cases). Additionally, counsel represents that she provided 

A.S. with a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw, advised A.S. of her right to review the 

record and file her own brief, and informed A.S. how to obtain a copy of the record, providing her 

with a form motion for access to the appellate record. We issued an order setting a deadline for 

A.S. to file a pro se brief. However, A.S. did not request the appellate record or file a pro se brief.
04-23-01103-CV

- 2 -

After reviewing the appellate record and appointed counsel’s brief, we conclude no 

plausible grounds exist for reversal of the termination order. Accordingly, we affirm the trial 

court’s termination order. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because it does not show good 

cause for withdrawal. See id. at 27 & n.7 (holding that counsel’s obligations in a parental 

termination case extend through exhaustion or waiver of all appeals and that withdrawal should be 

permitted by a court of appeals “only for good cause”).

Beth Watkins, Justice
Northern Ada County PM 10 Maintenance Plan



### emissions for PM10 are inthe last year ofeach ofthe time periods listed above. The conformity rule states that "emissions in years for whichno motor vehicle emissions budget are specifically established mustbe equal to the motorvehicle emissionbudget(s) established for the mostrecent prioryear" (40 CFR93.118(b)(1)(ii)). Table 9 highlights the PM10 MVEB for eachplanning period.

Table 9. PM1o motorvehicle emissions budget.

Time Period
2008 2015 2023 PM1o MVEB (tons per day) 31.0 42.9 60.1 Note: The PM1o emissions were taken from the "Development ofthe Base- andFuture-YearMobile Source Emission Inventories forthe Treasure Valley, Idaho" (Appendix E). They include the annual tail pipe emissions (Table 1 0), annual paved road dust emissions (Table 13), and the unpaved road dust emissions (Table 16) in Appendix E. The annual emissions were divided by 365 days to calculate tons per day and for the 2008-2015 and 2015-2023 periods, increased by a 10% safety margin. 

### 5.3.2 MVEB for NOx and VOC The conformityrule requires anMVEB for VOCs and NOx as precursors to PM10 when they are significant contributors (40 CFR93.109(b)(2)(iii)). Sulfurdioxide (S02) 

### is aninsignificant contributorto the secondary aerosol formation and is not included. AlthoughNH3 

### contributes to secondary aerosol formation, the region is "ammoniarich," so the very small mobile source NH3 

### emissions are also not considered in MVEBs. Accordingly, DEQ is establishingNOx and VOC emissions budgets for the base year 2008 as well as 2015 and 2023. The forecasted NOx and VOC emissions are expected to decline overtime eventhough the MVEB increases (see Table 10 footnote). Similarto the PM10

### MVEB, a safety margin of 10% was added to the 2008-2015 and 2015-2023 planning periods (Table 10).
Table 10. NOx and VOC motorvehicle emissions budget. Time Period NOx MVEB VOC MVEB 2008 29.5 12.6 2015 2023 29.5 34.2 12.6 17.2 Note: From Table 23 in the "SpeciatedLinearPM to Roll-ForwardModeling Report"(Appendix C). As discussed in that report, the model does not treat nonlinear chemical processes, so NOx and VOC were held constant for modeling purposes even though they are generally declining overtime. However, since the out year of2050 was calculated by multiplying the projected 2050 vehicle miles traveled by the projected 2015 vehicle fleet emission rates, this causes an increase in NOx and VOC because the fleet emission rates are held constant and emissions reductions expected from a newer fleet are not included. The emissions from this conservative approach were included in the PM1o rollforward modeling run to demonstrate adequacy ofthe MVEB. 

### 5.3.3 MVEB Conclusion Before the MVEB can be used for conformity purposes it must demonstrate "adequacy." For EPA to determine the MVEB is adequate, the conformityrule requires that MVEB emissions

. must be considered with all otheremissions sources and be consistent with the applicable maintenance plan (40 CFR 93.118(e)(4)(iv)). Modeling must demonstrate that all emissions

14
MEMORANDUM

TO: DOCKET #: EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0198

FROM: Rebecca von dem Hagen, EPA/Stratospheric Protection Division

Re: Meetings with Automobile Manufacturers Regarding Motor Vehicle Air 

Conditioning Refrigerant Transition

Date: July 9, 2014

This memo documents several meetings in early 2014 between EPA’s Office of Air and 

Radiation (Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) and Office of Atmospheric 

Programs (OAP)), and representatives of several automobile manufacturers to discuss 

manufacturer plans for transitioning from the current air conditioning refrigerant to climatefriendly alternative refrigerants. Specific information shared by automobile manufacturers was 

claimed as confidential.

List of Meetings: 

Automobile 

Manufacturer

Date Automobile Manufacturer 

Attendees

Agency Attendees

Ford 1/28/14 Cynthia Williams, Alyssa 

Werthman, Angelo Patti, 

Nancy Homeister

Cindy Newberg, Ed Nam

Chrysler 1/29/14 Frank Krich, Gary Oshnock, 

Mike Rinaldi

Cindy Newberg, Ed Nam

Ford 2/3/14 Cynthia Williams, Alyssa 

Werthman, Angelo Patti, 

Nancy Homeister, Steven 

Lambert, Tim Wallington

Cindy Newberg, Drusilla Hufford, 

Rebecca von dem Hagen, Margaret 

Sheppard, Dave Godwin, Ed Nam

Daimler 2/3/14 Bill Craven, Jurgen 

Wertenbach

Drusilla Hufford, Rebecca von dem 

Hagen

Honda 2/6/14 Jim Kliesch Cindy Newberg, Ed Nam

Hyundai 3/28/14 Debbie Bakker, Seungwon 

Shin, Amy Lilly, Ryan Fortier

Cindy Newberg, Drusilla Hufford, Ed 

Nam, Tad Wysor

Nissan 3/28/14 Yasumi NakamuraNewbraughCindy Newberg, Ed Nam, Tad Wysor

Volkswagen 3/28/14 Stuart Johnson, Nick 

Tamborra

Cindy Newberg, Drusilla Hufford, Ed 

Nam, Tad Wysor

Ford 4/22/14 Cynthia Williams, Angelo 

Patti, Nancy Homeister

Cindy Newberg, Rebecca von dem 

Hagen, Ed Nam, Tad Wysor

Toyota 4/28/14 Matt Kevnick, Rick Gezelle Cindy Newberg, Tad Wysor, Ed Nam

Ford 5/15/14 Cynthia Williams, Angelo 

Patti, Nancy Homeister, 

Alyssa Werthman

Cindy Newberg, Rebecca von dem 

Hagen, Ed Nam, Tad Wysor
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2184 

To extend the suspension of duty on 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4- 

Nonafluorobutanesulfonic acid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4- 

Nonafluorobutanesulfonic acid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-NONAFLUOROBUTANESULFONIC 

4 ACID. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.64 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,4-Nonafluorobutanesulfonic acid, potas8 sium salt) is amended by striking the date in the effective 

9 period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2184 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          2,734
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                      2,172,516
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,172,516
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       2,923,504
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,934
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,512,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,172,516
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              753,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            119,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (753,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (753,946)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (753,946)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        


</TABLE>
#### In re Tena Lanee WYNDON.

No. 89-OB-0184.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

In re Wyndon, Tena Lanee; — Plaintiff(s); applying for permission to take the Louisiana State Bar Examination.

Granted
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2154

  To suspend temporarily the duty on dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DODECYLTRIMETHYLAMMONIUM BROMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Dodecyltrimethylam  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        monium bromide                                                     31/2011.......
                        (CAS No. 1119-94-
                        4) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2923.90.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 9-9-2009 

# U SA v . Le P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 07-3254

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . L e " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 694. h tt p://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/694Honora ble Richard G . Stearns, United States District Judge f or the District of * Massac husetts, sitt ing by

designation. 1 UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_________ N os . 08- 2414 /07- 3254

_________ UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

v . M I CH AE L NGUYE N, THU Y A . LE A pp el l ants

___________________ A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e E a ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia N os . 04- cr - 00767- 15 /04- cr - 00767- 22 (D istri ct Ju d g e: T h e H o n o rab le P au l S. D iam o n d )

___________________ S u b m itted P u rsua n t t o T h ir d C ir cu itL A R 3 4 . 1 (a)

A pr i l 13, 2009 B e f o re : M c K E E , S M IT H , C i r cui tJudges a n d S T E AR NS , D is t r i ct Judge . * OR DE R A M E NDI NG OP I NI ON AND J UDGMENT I tappea r i ng t hatA ppel l antN guy en w as i ncor r ect l yi dent i fi ed as R ober tN guy en2

r at hert hatM i chae l N guy en, i ti s her ebyO R D E R E D t hatt he opi ni on and j udgm entfi l ed Sept ember 8, 2009 ar e amended t o cor r ect l yi dent i fyA ppel l antN guy en as M i chae l N guy en. F o r th e C o u rt,

M arc ia M . W aldro n , C lerk

D at ed: Sept ember 9, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15098-15099]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL12-44-000; QF87-483-004]


AES Hawaii, Inc.; Notice of Petition for Temporary Waiver

    Take notice that on March 5, 2012, pursuant to section 292.205(c) 
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 292.205(c), AES Hawaii, Inc. (AES 
Hawaii) filed a Request for Temporary Waiver, for calendar year 2011, 
of the five percent operating standard set forth in 18 CFR 292-
205(a)(1) of the Commission's Regulations for the topping-cycle 
cogeneration facility located on the island of Oauh, Hawaii. AES Hawaii 
makes such a request because of a forced boiler outage in the fourth 
quarter of 2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.

[[Page 15099]]

Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 
copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a3c3f283935141613141f290f0a0a15080e3a1c1f0819541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="52141700111d3c3e3b3c37012722223d202612343720317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2012.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6110 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 43 (Monday, March 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13158-13159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5391]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m., Wednesday, March 21, 2012.

PLACE: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: Hearing OPEN to the Public at 2 p.m.

PURPOSE: Public Hearing in conjunction with each meeting of OPIC's 
Board of Directors, to afford an opportunity for any person to present 
views regarding the activities of the Corporation.

PROCEDURES: 
    Individuals wishing to address the hearing orally must provide 
advance notice to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no later than 5 p.m. 
Friday, March 16, 2012. The notice must include the individual's name, 
title, organization, address, and telephone number, and a concise 
summary of the subject matter to be presented.
    Oral presentations may not exceed ten (10) minutes. The time for 
individual presentations may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, 
to afford all participants who have submitted a timely request an 
opportunity to be heard.
    Participants wishing to submit a written statement for the record 
must submit a copy of such statement to OPIC's Corporate Secretary no 
later than 5 p.m. Friday, March 16, 2012. Such statement must be 
typewritten, double-spaced, and may not exceed twenty-five (25) pages.
    Upon receipt of the required notice, OPIC will prepare an agenda, 
which will be available at the hearing, that identifies speakers, the 
subject on which each participant will speak, and the time allotted for 
each presentation.
    A written summary of the hearing will be compiled, and such summary 
will be made available, upon written request to OPIC's Corporate 
Secretary, at the cost of reproduction.
    Written summaries of the projects to be presented at the March 29, 
2012 Board meeting will be posted on OPIC's Web site on or about 
Friday, March 9, 2012.

CONTACT PERSON FOR INFORMATION: Information on the hearing may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, via facsimile at (202) 
408-0297, or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eead818080878bc0aa8199809dae819e878dc0898198"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c487abaaaaada1ea80abb3aab784abb4ada7eaa3abb2">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 13159]]


    Dated: March 1, 2012.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5391 Filed 3-1-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>