alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer of Crocs, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

 

(1)             The Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2010(the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78mor 78o(d)), and

 

(2)             The information contained inthe Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered bythis report.

 
| Date: August 5, 2010 | /s/ John McCarvel                                                               |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      | John McCarvel                                                                   |
| * *                  | *President and Chief Executive Officer*                                         |
|                      | (Principal Executive Officer)                                                   |
|                      |                                                                            |
|                      | /s/ Russell C. Hammer                                                           |
|                      | Russell C. Hammer                                                               |
| * *                  | *Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President—*

*Finance and Treasurer* |
|                      | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                                    |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Crocs, Inc. and will be retainedby Crocs, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2266 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2266

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS WITH A CARGO STORAGE FROM 1401 TO 
              2200 CUBIC INCHES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Insulated           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          hydration systems                                                  31/2011.......
                          with an outer
                          surface of
                          textile materials
                          whose interior
                          incorporates a
                          flexible plastic
                          container of a
                          kind for storing
                          and dispensing
                          potable beverages
                          through attached
                          flexible tubing
                          and which have a
                          cargo storage
                          capacity from
                          1401 through 2200
                          cubic inches
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.92.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2012 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2012

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triacetonamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2009

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triacetonamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIACETONAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-4-
piperidinone) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 21, 2002

Before

Hon. Joel M. Flaum, Chief Judge

Hon. John L. Coffey, Circuit Judge

Hon. Daniel A. Manion, Circuit Judge

No. 00-3242

Rene Rodriguez,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

United States of America,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Eastern 

District of Wisconsin

No. 97 C 426

Thomas J. Curran, Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on April 11, 2002 is amended as follows:

A footnote is added at the end of the carryover paragraph at the top of p.13 of the slip opinion, to read:

Rodriguez's Apprendi claim does not benefit from our recent decision in Ashley v. United States, 266

F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 2001), where we held that the one-year statute of limitations in §2255 does not

apply to Apprendi claims brought in initial motions for collateral review. Rodriguez’s Apprendi claim

is not an initial motion for collateral review as it was raised in post-judgment motion to amend his

initial claim which the district court denied in a proper exercise of discretion. Ashley does not apply

in this case because Rodriguez’s Apprendi claim is a successive collateral attack triggering AEDPA’s

gate-keeping functions. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ¶ 8.1.

Petitioner-Appellant filed a petition for rehearing en banc on April 25, 2002. No judge in regular

active service has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc, and all of the judges on the panel have

voted to deny rehearing. The petition is therefore DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CFC International, Inc. and
subsidiaries  (the  "Company")  for the fiscal year ended  December  31, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I Dennis W. Lakomy,  Executive Vice  President,  and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



     /s/________________________________________Dennis W. Lakomy
     Name:        Dennis W. Lakomy
     Title:       Executive Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer
     Date:        March 21, 2003

This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2164 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2164

         To suspend temporarily the duty on Triethylenediamine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on Triethylenediamine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIETHYLENEDIAMINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Triethylenediamine  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        (CAS No. 280-57-                                                   31/2011.......
                        9) (provided for
                        in subheading
                        2933.59.70)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23(b)

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms  S-8  No.33-33276, No.33-16939 and No. 333-117057) pertaining to the 1994
Incentive  Plan  of  Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January
24,  2003,  with  respect to the statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and  cash  flows  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2002 included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
March 24, 2005
p. 1



# OAR Box 

# 1132 Prepped by Candice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 40 ) ll-F- 4
Docket Number: 

# A-86-0 3

Printed 4/18/2008 2:24:46

PM Sheet 40 of 122P. 2 'istt «Y:X.r « Telecopie r 702 0 i 7-10-8 9 i 4:2BP « i 2023953746 ^ 8 M M««i » 2

Diese l Fue l Quality Commen t

EP A estimate s th e potentia l fo r reduce

d engine wea r fro

m low-sulfu

r fue l unde r thre e alternativ e truc k manufacturer/owne r respons e scenarios : (1 ) extende d oi l chang e interval s wit hn o increas e i nengine life , (2 ) n o change i noi l chang e interval s bu t a nincreas e i nengin e life , an

d (3 ) n o chang e i n oi l chang e interval s wit hincrease s i nbot hengine an d tota l vehicl e life , EP A ha s no dat a t o determin e whichscenari o i s mos t likel y t o occur . Th e annua l benefit s o f decreased engine wea r i nyea r 201 0 ar e estimated a t between$40 0 millio nan d $3. 7 billion ; fue l costs , however , ar e estimate d t o increas e betwee n$53 0 million an d $1. 3 billion . Based o nthes e estimates , the annua l ne t benefi t accruin g directl y

t o truc k owner s fro m reduce d engine wea r alone coul d b e ove r $ 2 billion . Unde r thi s scenario , truc k owner s woul d b e willin g t o pa y ove r $ 2 billio

nmor e pe r yea r for low-sulfur diese l fue l thani t woul d cos t refiner s t o produc e it . T o th e exten t tha t thes e estimate s accuratel y reflec t th e effect s o f the proposed regulation , ther e mus t b e a reaso nwh y suchlarg e potentia l ne t gain s woul d no t materialize , if-EP A ver e t o tak e r.o action . EP

A seek s dominan

t o nthi s issue *
on e possibl e explanatio ni s tha t ther e ar e significan t cost s t o truc k owner s o f determinin g th e actua l effect s o f reduced sulfur fuel s onengine wear . Sinc e th e effect s tak e plac e inside engine s ove r fairl y lon g period s o f time , i t may no t b e eas y

t o observe , isolate , an d measur e the effect s o f reduced sulfur fuels , i f thes e informatio ncost s ar e sufficientl y large , the

y coul d outweig

hthe potentia l ne t benefit s o f a move t o low-sulfur fue l resultin

g fro m marke t force s alone . Unde r thes e circumstances , the informatio ncost s woul d effectivel y preven t the introductio

no f low-sulfu

r fuel . .f ^



# w

. — i I EP A AJRJ>OCKH LP. 3 "SN T BYJXero x Telecopie r 702 0 ; 7-10-8 9 ; 4:28P M ; 2023953746

- 37 4 8368 \ *



### TELX7A XTRANSMITTA

L COVE R8HBE T

Pleas e Delive r Th e followin g Page(s ) To t
City i ^__ 

### Telefa x Humber

tJ3/3- &&JP— 4*3*&P* <P?^s 

## &TS f— r? 74'- Pr?<£ J>-
Division * dZ&A- ; Tota l numbe r o f Page s ^y ^ includin g cove r sheet* . Z f yo ud o no t reoeiv e al l pages ; pleas e cal l bac k a s soo na s possibl e t o (202 ) 315-3084 * T o transmi t t o us , oal l (202 ) 395-3749 *

Transmitte dby i &&& #



### Date t"%/^/^Tim e Sent *
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7737

In Re: CARLOS DUKE, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-90-389) Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlos Duke, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Carlos Duke filed this petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the district court to “produce a statement of opinion.” The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Duke has failed to make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief; the appropriate vehicle for challenging the district court’s decision is an appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 58, 60 (4th Cir. 1979). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
The attachments contain the material used by the Rooms and Spaces S ubcommittee in

presenting their draft proposal provided for full committee review and comment during the fourth meeting of the Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee on September 11 and 12, 2014.  Rooms and Spaces Subcommittee Draft Proposal  Photo of Door P late Between Two High Speed Rail Cars The subcommittee also used three video clips. These clips a re included in this “Supporting Documents” section under the title: 4th Meeting – Video Clips – Connection Between High Speed Rail Cars.
##### 



UNITED STATES  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-K/A
  þ
    
    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 5(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the fiscal year ended
    
    December 31, 2003
 OR
 o
    
    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Commission File Number 001-14784
 Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
 
  Nevada
    
    75-2615944(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 1755 Wittington Place, Suite 340, Dallas, Texas
    
    75234(Address of prinicpal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants Telephone Number, including area code
    
    214-750-5800
  Title of Each ClassCommon Stock, $0.01 par value
    
    Name of each exchange on which registeredAmerican Stock Exchange
 None
 Yes o No þ
 þ
 Yes o No þ
 Yes o No þ




---



##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR  INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS, INC.
  
    
    Page 26  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has
been amended to provide the city and state where the report is issued.
 
    
    Pages 42-43 Item 8. Financial Statements. Note 5 to the
consolidated financial statements is further amended to provide enhanced
disclosure with respect to the Metra transaction.
 
    
    Exhibit 31.1  Certification required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a)
and 15d-14(a).
 1




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 
 INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY
INVESTORS, INC.By:
    /s/ R. Neil Crouch, IIR. Neil Crouch, II, Executive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer and Acting
Principal Executive Officer 2




---



##### 



26




---



##### 



NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE
  2006
    
    
    6,1012007
    
    
    7172008
    
    
    2,8332009
    
    
    742Thereafter
    
    
    27,503$
    44,342
   42




---



##### 



NOTES AND INTEREST PAYABLE
  Sq.Ft/
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Net Cash Received/Property
    
    Location
    
    Acres
    
    
    Debt Incurred
    
    
    Debt Discharged
    
    
    (Paid)
    
    
    Interest Rate
    
    
    Maturity DateOffice Building
2010 Valley View
    
    Farmers Branch, TX
    
    
    40,066
    
    
    $
    2,436
    
    
    $
    1,778
    
    
    
    547
    
    
    
    6.25
    %
    
    
    10/08Travelers Land
    
    Farmers Branch, TX
    
    
    97,361
    
    
    $
    5,000
    
    
    $
    4,225
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    6.00
    %(1)
    
    
    12/06
 
 (1) Variable Rate RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
  43
# L_2006311EN.01003001.xml

| 10.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 311/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 311/30

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1661/2006

of 9 November 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 936/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 3 to 9 November 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of common wheat issued in Regulation (EC) No 936/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 6.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Entity Name

State of OrganizationHEARST-ARGYLE STATIONS, INC.

NEVADAWAPT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAKHBS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAKMBC HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWCVB HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWISN HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWTAE HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAOHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

NEVADAJACKSON HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

DELAWAREARKANSAS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

DELAWAREHEARST-ARGYLE SPORTS, INC.

DELAWAREHEARST-ARGYLE PROPERTIES, INC.

DELAWAREHATV INVESTMENTS, INC.

DELAWAREDES MOINES HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

DELAWAREORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

DELAWARENEW ORLEANS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

DELAWAREWYFF HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWXII HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAKOAT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWLKY HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAKETV HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAWGAL HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.

CALIFORNIAHEARST-ARGYLE CAPITAL TRUST

DELAWARE


---



QuickLinks