alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2048

ERIC NTORE, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 18, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David C. Bennion, NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Michael F. Hertz, Acting Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Mona Maria Yousif, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Eric Ntore, a native and citizen of Burundi, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Before this court, Ntore challenges the determination that he failed to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Ntore fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that he seeks. Additionally, we uphold the denial of Ntore’s request for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Ntore failed to show

23 that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. We also find that substantial evidence supports the finding that Ntore failed to meet the standard for relief under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208 .16(c)(2) (2009). We find that Ntore failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. Given this disposition, we deny the pending motion for stay of removal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2201 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4-(tbutylcarbonyloxy) styrene-4-hydroxystyrene copolymer. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4-(t-butylcarbonyloxy) styrene-4-hydroxystyrene copolymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-(1-ETHOXYETHOXY) STYRENE-4-(T4 BUTYLCARBONYLOXY) STYRENE-4- 

5 HYDROXYSTYRENE COPOLYMER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2201 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-(1-Ethoxyethoxy) styrene-4- 

(t-butylcarbonyloxy) styrene4-hydroxystyrene copolymer 

(CAS No. 177034–75–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

3903.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
REGULUS
 Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria
 1.
    
    Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100  Asset Backed Securities,
17 C.F.R. §§229.1100 - 229.1123
(Regulation AB), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(individually and collectively Regulus), is responsible for assessing its compliance with
the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it provides to
customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities transactions and who have
requested confirmation of Regulus compliance in connection with loan and/or receivables
portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities transactions (the
Platform). Remittance processing is a service whereby
check payments that are remitted by
mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a highly automated data capture
system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by the beneficiary of the payment.2.
    
    The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB were used in
Regulus assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the servicing criteria set
forth in Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB
are applicable to the
servicing activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the
Applicable Servicing Criteria). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in the servicing
activities referenced by such servicing criteria.3.
    
    As of and for the year ended December 31, 2010, Regulus has complied in all material
respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB.4.
    
    KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on
Regulus assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2010. A copy of that attestation report is attached hereto as
Exhibit A.
 /s/ Kathleen HamburgerKathleen HamburgerChief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2016 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2016

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Bricorr 288.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Bricorr 288.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BRICORR 288.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Phosphonic acid,    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        maleic anhydride                                                   31/2011.......
                        sodium salt
                        complex (CAS No.
                        180513-31-9)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2222 

To suspend temporarily the duty on yarn of carded camel hair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. LIEBERMAN (for himself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on yarn of carded camel 

hair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. YARN OF CARDED CAMEL HAIR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.26 Yarn of carded camel hair 

(provided for in subheading 

5108.10.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2222 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
### 4/17/09 Page 1 of 1

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT

Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment;

Water releases were eliminated and the incineration releases were be low the threshold for exposure

assessment

Case Number: P090130 Assessor:

Sherer

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#: Number of Release Sites:

Release Activity:

Release Description: WATER LANDFILL INCINER LAND/INCIN FUGITIVE

Total Releases:

(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:

(kg/day) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/day)

Remarks: EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation

of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review

Exposure Report (this report).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         892,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    321,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,311,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,346,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          690,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                       130,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     525,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,346,000
<SALES>                                        142,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,000
<CGS>                                           81,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,643,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,584,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,584,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 35.2

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Amex Card Services Company

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

American Express Issuance Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Amex Card Services Company (ACSC), a wholly owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant
to the Subservicing Agreement (the Agreement) dated as of June 1, 2006, between TRS and ACSC, does hereby certify that:

1.
ACSC performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver
this Certificate.

3. A review of ACSCs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, ACSC has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material
respects under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

5. Anderson Y. Lee, Kevin L. Thompson, Denise D. Roberts and Kunal B. Singhania
are authorized to rely on this Certification in connection with their Sarbanes-Oxley and Regulation AB Item 1123 Certifications for the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 20th day of March, 2013.



|                           |  |               
|-------------------------- |  | --------------
|AMEX CARD SERVICES COMPANY
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Beth Lacey
|                           |  | Beth Lacey    
|                           |  | President
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2139 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Syloboc K-200. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Syloboc K-200. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SYLOBOC K-200. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Silicon dioxide (CAS No. 

7631–86–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2811.22.10) ........ 2% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2139 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2150 

To suspend temporarily the duty on blocked polyisocyanate hardner; 2-Butanone, oxime, polymer with 1,6-diisocyanatohexane and 2-ethyl-2- 

(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on blocked polyisocyanate 

hardner; 2-Butanone, oxime, polymer with 1,6- 

diisocyanatohexane and 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLOCKED POLYISOCYANATE HARDNER; 2-BU4 TANONE, OXIME, POLYMER WITH 1,6- 

5 DIISOCYANATOHEXANE AND 2-ETHYL-2- 

6 (HYDROXYMETHYL)-1,3-PROPANEDIOL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2150 IS

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Blocked polyisocyanate 

hardner; 2-Butanone, oxime, 

polymer with 1,6- 

diisocyanatohexane and 2- 

ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol (CAS No. 

72968–62–8) (provided for in 

subheading 3911.90.90) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Trung Tri Doan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | January   21, 2011 |   | /s/   Trung Tri Doan                          |
|--------|--------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |               |   | Name:   Trung Tri Doan                        |
|   |               |   | Title:   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Marine Growth  Ventures,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "report"),  each of
the  undersigned  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Action of 2002, that to the best
of his knowledge:

      (1)   The report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated: May 16, 2006                     By:   /s/ Craig Hodgkins
                                              ---------------------
                                              Craig Hodgkins
                                              President and Director
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00290

- CV

IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT

Original Proceeding

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9276PR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator ’ s Petition for Wr it of Mandamus filed on November 5, 2021 is denied.

Relator ’ s Motion for Emergency Stay i s dismissed as moot.

M ATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Joh nson, and

Justice Smith

Petition denied ; motion di smissed

Opinion d elivered and filed November 10, 2021

[ OT 06]
p.1 

JUL 24 2013 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater,NJ 08023 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

June 21, 2013 CBIC Control Number 

354951 

Room 4146 -

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW o% 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA - HQ - OPPT - 2003 - 0012 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal - Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

May 2013 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in May 2013. In accordance with the 

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided 

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures 

include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

Jacques Monteux* 

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems 

DuPont Chambers Works 

CM/clc 

Enclosures
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,314
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,378
<INVENTORY>                                     52,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,737
<PP&E>                                          85,490
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,551
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 140,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,576
<BONDS>                                         33,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   140,266
<SALES>                                        264,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,095
<CGS>                                          202,268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,999
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,420
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
        

</TABLE>