alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cause No. 2001-PC-1263

IN THE MATTER OF ESTATE OF IN THE PROBATE gOJJjlT^

2*

ADMINISTRATOR FOR ESTATE OF KING) NUMBER ONE sTrPetitioner $-,

v. ""-rTri.-iMN

BEXAR COUNTY, ETAL

Respondents, FOR BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF APPEAL,

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Tex. R. App. Pro 27.1 and subjeft t(|the>eli

requested in Appellant's pending motion for abatement relief, that an ai

No. 2001-PC-1263 is taken in the Texas Fourth Court of Appeals from the^r

County Probate Court #1, dated June 29,2015, and from administrative findings

by the Probate Court on July 21,2015. Appellant construes the events of June 29,2015 and on

July 21,2015 as manifestation of the Probate Court's intention to accord finality the dismissal

of Appellant's claims for relief, in that the final order grants the respondents' motion for a nunc

pro tune dismissal order in lieu of the erroneously dated order on March 31.2015, and in that

the administrative findings operate as final response to Appellant's notice of late filing of

findings of fact and conclusions of law filed on July 10,2015. Appellant reserves special

exceptions to the actions taken on July 21,2015 on jurisdictional and evidentiary grounds, and

reserves challenges to their legal insufficiency for presentation as part of his regular appeal.

Dated: July 27,2015 Respectfully Submitted,

Rowland J. Ma

951 Lombrano

San Antonio, Tx 78207

(210) 323-3849
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

delivered copy of this, "Final Supplemental Notice of Appeal," to Attorney Karen

Evertson c/o 411 S. Frio St., San Antonio, Tx., via email on July 14,2015.

Rowland J. Martin
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1861 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1861

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-year 
extension of the increased rehabilitation credit for structures in the 
                         Gulf Opportunity Zone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 22, 2009

 Ms. Landrieu (for herself, Mr. Wicker, and Mr. Vitter) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a 2-year 
extension of the increased rehabilitation credit for structures in the 
                         Gulf Opportunity Zone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-YEAR EXTENSION OF INCREASED REHABILITATION CREDIT FOR 
              STRUCTURES IN THE GULF OPPORTUNITY ZONE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1400N(h) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``December 31, 2009'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to expenditures paid or incurred after December 31, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
APAC Customer Services,
  Inc.
  
  Phone 847-374-4980Six Parkway North Center
  
  Fax 847-374-4991APAC Customer Services
  
  Deerfield, IL 60015
  
  www.apaccustomerservices.com     Exhibit 99.1     March 21, 2002    Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5th Street, NW Washington, DC 20549  Ladies and Gentleman:  Pursuant
to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 33-8070, this letter is to
confirm that APAC Customer Services, Inc. has received assurance from its
independent public accountants, Arthur Andersen LLP (Arthur Andersen), that
Arthur Andersens audit of our consolidated financial statements as of December
30, 2001 and for the year then ended (the Audit) was subject to Arthur
Andersens quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice
to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur
Andersen personnel working on the Audit, and availability of national office
consultation.  APAC Customer Services, Inc.  /s/ Marc T. Tanenberg  Senior Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 26, 2022

NO. 03-20-00099-CR

Justin Edward Panus, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying postconviction forensic DNA testing. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order 

denying postconviction forensic DNA testing. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
# L_2007065EN.01001203.xml

| 3.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 65/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 65/12

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing the second ‘Marco Polo’ programme for the granting of Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system (Marco Polo II) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1382/2003

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 328 of 24 November 2006
  )

On page 5, in the first subparagraph of Article 11:

for:

‘The financial envelope for the implementation of the Marco Polo II Programme, for the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013, shall be EUR 400 million (1).

read:

‘The financial envelope for the implementation of the Marco Polo II Programme, for the period 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013, shall be EUR 450 million.’.

---

(1)  This amount is based on 2004 figures and shall be subject to technical adjustment to take account of inflation.’,

1

---
#### BERKELEY FEDERAL BANK AND TRUST FSB *v.*JEFFREY W. NAVIN ET AL.

*Kenneth R. Davis,*in support of the petition.

*Anne R. Hoyt,*in opposition.

Decided March 25, 1998

The defendant Jeffrey W. Navin’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 931 (AC 17126), is denied.
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ William A. SangerWilliam A. SangerChief Executive Officer August 4,
2006/s/ Randel G. OwenRandel G. OwenChief Financial Officer August 4,
2006
1

The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1302

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Southern District of Iowa.

Alfredo Sauz-Flores, also known as *

Alfredo Sauz, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: August 19, 2010

Filed: August 24, 2010

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MELLOY and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement,

which contained an appeal waiver, Alfredo Sauz-Flores pleaded guilty to conspiracy

to distribute methamphetamine in an amount greater than 50 grams, in violation of 21

U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court1

 sentenced him to 360

months in prison--in accord with the plea agreement--and 10 years of supervised
-2-

release. On appeal, his counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case, because the record shows the

requisite knowledge and voluntariness, the appeal is within the scope of the waiver,

and no injustice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis,

333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver

and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, both plea agreement and

waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice

would result; one important way district court can ensure plea agreement and appeal

waiver are knowing and voluntary is to question defendant properly about decision

to enter agreement and to waive right to appeal); see also United States v. Sisco, 576

F.3d 791, 796 (8th Cir. 2009) (enforcing appeal waiver and finding no miscarriage of

justice in appeal challenging sentence as unreasonable because sentence did not

exceed statutory maximum); United States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071

(8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). 

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues that are not covered by the appeal

waiver. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and we dismiss this

appeal.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 2, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ WILLIAM L. BALLHAUSWilliam L. BallhausPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 10, 2009
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

WILLIAM WOODROW SPRINGFIELD,

Sr.,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-30229

D.C. No. 1:15-cr-00121-SPW-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 2, 2017** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Defendant William Springfield appeals from the district court’s denial of his

motion to suppress. We affirm.

FILED

OCT 20 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Even if Springfield has standing to challenge the search of the vehicle, the

motion to suppress the evidence obtained through that search was properly denied. 

The district court found that the search of the car would have occurred anyway,

even if Springfield had not been arrested and searched. That finding was not

clearly erroneous. The officers testified that an inventory search of a stolen vehicle

was standard procedure. See United States v. Mota, 982 F.2d 1384, 1387 (9th Cir.

1993). It is not disputed that the vehicle had been reported stolen. Because the

methamphetamine “ultimately or inevitably would have been discovered by lawful

means,” the inevitable discovery doctrine applies. Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431,

444 (1984).

AFFIRMED. 

2
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2017 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Coflake. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Coflake. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COFLAKE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mixtures of polyethylene glycol (CAS No. 25322–68–3), 

(acetato)pentammine cobalt 

dinitrate (CAS No. 14854– 

63–8), and zinc carbonate 

(CAS No. 3486–35–9) (provided for in subheading 

3815.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2017 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Such subchapter is 

2 further amended by striking heading 9902.03.34. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Copyright Material (Copyright material may not be reproduced without 

the consent of the copyright holder.) 

"Oil Crops of the World" Their Breeding and Utilization 

McGRAW-Hill Publishing Company 

kg- 111 -- 147
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2178 

To extend the suspension of duty on tetraethylammonium 

perfluoroctanesulfonate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on tetraethylammonium 

perfluoroctanesulfonate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TETRAETHYLAMMONIUM PERFLUOR4 OCTANESULFONATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.15 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 tetraethylammonium perfluoroctanesulfonate) is amended 

8 by striking the date in the effective period column and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2178 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Jason Reid,
      President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jody Frank, Chief Financial Officer,
      certify. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)
      This
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Jason Reid
            
            /s/
                Jody E. FrankJason
                ReidPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Jody
                E. Frank
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                September 17, 2008
            
            Date:
                September 17, 2008
#### STATE of Louisiana v. Jimmi C. HUGHES a/k/a Jimmi C. Lexing.

No. 88-KH-3150.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 20, 1989.

In re Hughes, Jimmi C. a/k/a; Lexing, Jimmi C. Hughes; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court, Div. “B.”

Denied. Relator must first file any request for additional reduction of bail in the district court.
# RECEIVED SERVED SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 

## SEP - 8 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICEOFHEARINGS 

## HEARING DOCKET

WASHINGTON, D.C.

APPLICATION OF TRANS NORTH AVIATJON, LTD FDMS DOCKETNO. FAA2014-1117 (Equal Access to Justice Action)

NOTICE OF APPLICANT'S APPEAL
COMES NOW Applicant, TRANS NORTH AVIATION, LTD., by and through its counsel, BARNETT & BORTH, LLC, pursuantto 14 C.F.R. §14.28 and 14 C.F.R. §13.233 and hereby appeals the INITIAL DECISION DENYING APPLICATIONFORATTORNEY'S FEES AND OTHEREXPENSES dated August 26,2015. Applicant prays tbat the decision be reversed.

Paul 

### R. Borth Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025 (815) 356-7042 (FAX) Respectfully submitted,

Attorney for Applicant Trans North Aviation, LTD.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Notice ofApplicant's Appeal was served via US Certified Mail, return receipt requested as follows: ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 FAX: 202-493-5142 ONE COPY Jessica E. Kabaz-Gomez,Agency's Counsel Enforcement Division AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7395 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536
Dated this 1 ''day ofSeptember 2015

2 Charles R. Barnett, III Attorney for Respondent
Exhibit 24.1

Power Of Attorney

Know all persons by these presents that each of the undersigned has made, constituted and appointed, and BY THESE PRESENTS make, constitute and appoint
George H. Hepburn, III and Joseph R. Doolan, true and lawful ATTORNEYS for himself and in his name, place and stead to sign that certain Annual Report on
Form 10-K, including all exhibits hereto, which Form 10-K is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before March 17, 2006 to be
executed by the undersigned in his capacity as a Director of APAC Customer Services, Inc, and to perform any and all other acts necessary in order to consummate such transaction, giving and granting
unto George H. Hepburn, III and Joseph R. Doolan, said ATTORNEYS full power and authority to do and perform all and every act and thing whatsoever, requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, with full power of substitution and revocation,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that George H. Hepburn, III and Joseph R. Doolan, said ATTORNEYS or their substitutes shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  |                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/THEODORE S. SCHWARTZTheodore S. Schwartz
| |  | /s/ROBERT J. KELLERRobert J. Keller        
| |  | /s/ROBERT F. BERNARDRobert F. Bernard      
| |  | /s/THOMAS M. COLLINSThomas M. Collins      
| |  | /s/JOHN W. GERDELMANJohn W. Gerdelman      
| |  | /s/JOHN J. PARKJohn J. Park                
| |  | /s/CINDY K. ANDREOTTICindy K. Andreotti    
| |  | /s/JOHN C. KRAFTJohn C. Kraft              

ek]

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PERSONNEL GROUP OF AMERICA, INC. FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           5,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (519)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,106
<PP&E>                                          10,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,176)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 293,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,548
<BONDS>                                         78,477
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   293,575
<SALES>                                        243,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,608
<CGS>                                          186,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  224,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,299
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,995
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,213
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56


</TABLE>