alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1986 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require States to provide 

for same day registration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. TESTER, Mr. HARKIN, and 

Mr. KERRY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require 

States to provide for same day registration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Same Day Registration 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Help America 

8 Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15481 et seq.) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating sections 304 and 305 as 

10 sections 305 and 306, respectively; and 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1986 IS

1 (2) by inserting after section 303 the following 

2 new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 304. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 ‘‘(1) REGISTRATION.—Notwithstanding section 

6 8(a)(1)(D) of the National Voter Registration Act of 

7 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg–6), each State shall permit 

8 any eligible individual on the day of a Federal elec9 tion and on any day when voting, including early 

10 voting, is permitted for a Federal election— 

11 ‘‘(A) to register to vote in such election at 

12 the polling place using a form that meets the 

13 requirements under section 9(b) of the National 

14 Voter Registration Act of 1993; and 

15 ‘‘(B) to cast a vote in such election. 

16 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirements under 

17 paragraph (1) shall not apply to a State in which, 

18 under a State law in effect continuously on and after 

19 the date of the enactment of this section, there is no 

20 voter registration requirement for individuals in the 

21 State with respect to elections for Federal office. 

22 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this 

23 section, the term ‘eligible individual’ means, with respect 

24 to any election for Federal office, an individual who is oth25 erwise qualified to vote in that election. 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1986 IS

1 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Each State shall be re2 quired to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) 

3 for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal of4 fice occurring in November 2010 and for any subsequent 

5 election for Federal office.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

7 (1) Section 401 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 15511) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘303, and 304’’. 

10 (2) The table of contents of such Act is amend11 ed— 

12 (A) by redesignating the items relating to 

13 sections 304 and 305 as relating to sections 

14 305 and 306, respectively; and 

15 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

16 section 303 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 304. Same day registration.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1884 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1884

               To suspend temporarily the duty on MDA50.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To suspend temporarily the duty on MDA50.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MDA50.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Mixtures of         Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          formaldehyde                                                       31/2011.......
                          polymers with
                          aniline (CAS No.
                          25214-70-4) and
                          with 4,4'-
                          methylendianiline
                          (CAS No. 101-77-
                          9) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          3909.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
    /s/ Cindy K. Andreotti
    
    /s/ Katherine AndreasenCindy K. Andreotti
    
    Katherine Andreasen/s/ Kevin T. Keleghan
    
    /s/ John C. KraftKevin T. Keleghan
    
    John C. Kraft/s/ John J. Park
    
    /s/ Theodore G. SchwartzJohn J. Park
    
    Theodore G. Schwartz/s/ Samuel K. Skinner
    
    /s/ John L. WorkmanSamuel K. Skinner
    
    John L. Workman
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-98440, 33-98444, 33-98442, 33-98446, 333-21799, 333-21795, 333-70599,
333-35812, and 333-35814) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement (No.
333-94757) on Form S-3 of CheckFree Corporation of our reports dated August 7,
2000, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
10-K of CheckFree Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2000.


 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 7, 2000
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. DENISE BROWNING,

Defendant

- Appellant No. 13

- 50111
D.C. No. 2:11

- cr - 00329

- PSG

- 3

MEMORANDUM

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted February 4 , 2015 Pasadena, California
Before: KLEINFELD and NGUYEN , Circuit Judges, and CARR, Senior

District Judge. ** Defendant Denise Browning appeals her conviction and sentence for willfully aiding or assisting in the filing of false tax returns, in violation of 26
U.S.C. § 7206(2). We h ave jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. §
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAR 20 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

3742(a). For the reasons stated below, we affirm the conviction, but vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.
1. Sufficient evidence supports Defendant’s conviction. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979), demonstrate s that Defendant willfully prepared false tax
returns. For example , i nstead of reporting the actual amount of wages paid to employees, Defendan t only reported the wage amount that matched the amount of taxes the company already paid

. In 2005, during an interview with an IRS agent, Defendant acknowledged
that the wages she reported on the returns should match those reported on the employees’ W

- 2 s. Nevertheless, on a subsequent return , she again u nderreported the wages paid to employees. Defendant refused to sign the returns because she did
not want to sign something under penalty of perjury that she knew was false

. Further, the jury viewed email correspondence between Defendant and her boss in which Defendant asked if she should file certain returns “as is, totally legit.” Finally, a t trial, Defendant admitted she knew the numbers she wrote on the returns were false. The jury, based on the eviden ce before it, reasonably rejected Defendant’s good

- faith defense that she relied on an IRS provision which she
believed allowed her to file the false returns if she later amended them.3

2. As the government correctly concedes, i n light of United States v.
Castro

- Ponce , 770 F.3d 819 (9th Cir. 2014), we must vacate and remand for resentencing. The district court imposed a two

- level increase in Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 on the ground that Defendant committed perjury , but failed to explicitly make findings as to perjury’ s three
elements. On remand, the district court must consider each element in deciding
whether to impose the enhancement

. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED

.
#### The Ellis-Young Company, a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Georgia, Plaintiff in Error, v. Putnam Lumber Co., a Corporation Organized and Existing Under the Laws of the State of Wisconsin, Defendant in Error.

This case was decided by Division A.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Duval county.

Per Curiam.

All the assignments of error on this record have been fully considered and held not well taken on the cross-error prosecuted by this plaintiff in error in the case of Putnam Lumber Co., plaintiff in error vs. The Ellis-Young Lumber Company, defendant in error, in the opinion of the court therein filed today. It is unnecessary therefore to consider further this record and an order, will be entéred dismissing the writ of error herein.

All concur.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (0.59 MB)
 
 GERMANY fly fight win BLUE U.S. Air Force airman AIR FORCE Airmen
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
# L_2006243EN.01002001.xml

| 6.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 243/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 243/20

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1321/2006

of 5 September 2006

fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 6 September 2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1785/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in rice (1), and in particular Article 1a,

Whereas:

| (1) | Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 excluding import licences for Basmati rice have been issued in respect of 430 075 tonnes for 1 September 2005 to 31 August 2006. The import duty for semi-milled or wholly milled rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than Basmati rice, must therefore be amended. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 excluding import licences for Basmati rice have been issued in respect of 430 075 tonnes for 1 September 2005 to 31 August 2006. The import duty for semi-milled or wholly milled rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than Basmati rice, must therefore be amended.

| (2) | As the applicable duty must be fixed no later than ten days from the end of the period referred to above, this Regulation must enter into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As the applicable duty must be fixed no later than ten days from the end of the period referred to above, this Regulation must enter into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 shall be EUR 42,5 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 96. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 797/2006 (OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 1).

1

---
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoff Turner,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Geoff TurnerGeoff
      TurnerPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      October 15, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     SCHEDULE II

                                 TRANSPRO, INC.

                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PERIOD                                         BALANCE AT       CHARGED TO      CHARGED TO      DEDUCTIONS    BALANCE AT
                                              BEGINNING OF       COSTS AND        OTHER                          END OF
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)                          PERIOD           EXPENSES      ACCOUNTS (1)                      PERIOD
<S>                                           <C>               <C>            <C>              <C>           <C>
Year Ended December 31, 1999
     Allowance for doubtful accounts           $  2,390           $  268         $ (238)         $  (292)       $ 2,128
     Allowance for obsolete inventory             5,605              875           (232)          (1,525)         4,723
     Allowance for tax loss valuation                 -                -            189                -            189

Year Ended December 31, 1998
     Allowance for doubtful accounts              3,441            1,394            250           (2,695)         2,390
     Allowance for obsolete inventory             5,003            1,629            800           (1,827)         5,605

Year Ended December 31, 1997
     Allowance for doubtful accounts              3,378            1,790              -           (1,727)         3,441
     Allowance for obsolete inventory             4,942            1,299              -           (1,238)         5,003
</TABLE>

(1)   Amounts adjusted in doubtful accounts and inventory were related to
      acquisition reserves and charged to goodwill. Amounts for tax valuation
      allowance were charged to deferred taxes.


                                       22
---

Exhibit: 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the **Som Resources Inc**.,(the "Company") on 10QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  I, Gary Fife, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
      of the Company.

Date: December 8, 2005.

/s/ Gary
FifeGary Fife

Chief Financial Officer(Title)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Financial Statements of Naptau Gold Corporation for the years ended December 31,
1999, 1998 and 1997 (audited) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such Financial Statements
</LEGEND>
        <S> <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,042
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          1,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         643,133
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        5,934
<OTHER-SE>                                  1,582,105
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,042
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (108,897)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            127,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               108,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           108,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  108,897
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .02



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2056 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2056

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium 
                               technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trifloxysulfuron-sodium 
                               technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIFLOXYSULFURON-SODIUM TECHNICAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to trifloxysulfuron-sodium 
technical) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```