alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000949859
<NAME>                        CFC INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,908,989
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,472,452
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,209,000)
<INVENTORY>                                     10,387,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,812,663
<PP&E>                                          42,439,262
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,881,085)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,361,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,081,246
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            43,927
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,701,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,361,998
<SALES>                                         66,147,299
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,147,299
<CGS>                                           44,714,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   59,276,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   475,881
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,198,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,029,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,167,531
<INCOME-TAX>                                       922,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,245,312
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,245,312
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.49


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 24 (Friday, February 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 6498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-2517]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is soliciting 
public comments on the proposed information collection described below. 
The proposed information collection will be sent to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be submitted on or 
before April 5, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Ms. Susan Daisey, Director, Office of Grant 
Management, National Endowment for the Humanities, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Room 311, Washington, DC 20506, or by email to: 
sdaisey@neh.gov. Telephone: 202-606-8494.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Endowment for the Humanities 
will submit the proposed information collection to OMB for review, as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. chapter 35). This notice is soliciting comments from members of 
the public and affected agencies. NEH is particularly interested in 
comments which help the agency to: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will 
have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's 
estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, 
including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) 
Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information 
on those who are to respond, including through the use of electronic 
submissions of responses.
    This Notice also lists the following information:
    Type of Review: New collection.
    Agency: National Endowment for the Humanities.
    Title of Proposal: General Clearance Authority to Develop 
Evaluation Instruments for the National Endowment for the Humanities.
    OMB Number: N/A.
    Affected Public: NEH grantees.
    Total Respondents: 1,000.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
    Total Responses: 1,000.
    Average Time per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 500 hours.
    Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized 
and/or included in the request for Office of Management and Budget 
approval of the information collection request. They will also become a 
matter of public record.

Carole Watson,
Deputy Chairman.
[FR Doc. 2011-2517 Filed 2-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIL RIJAL, Individually, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 11-35249

v. D.C. No.  2:10-cv-00709-RAJ UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND

IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ORDER

Respondent-Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 4, 2012*

Seattle, Washington

Filed June 13, 2012

Before: Barry G. Silverman and Mary H. Murguia,

Circuit Judges, and Dolly M. Gee, District Judge.**

COUNSEL

Robert O. Wells, Jr., Mikkelborg, Broz, Wells & Fryer, Seattle, Washington, for the petitioner-appellant.

Jeffrey M. Bauer, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee.

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

**The Honorable Dolly M. Gee, United States District Judge for the

Central District of California, sitting by designation. 

6735
ORDER

SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:

Anil Rijal appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, affirming the denial of his petition for an

immigration visa preference as an alien of “extraordinary ability” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(1)(A). We adopt as our

own the well-reasoned published opinion of the district court,

Rijal v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 772

F.Supp. 2d 1339 (W.D. Wash. 2011). 

AFFIRMED. 

6736 RIJAL v. USCIS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 PROMULGATED UNDER THE  SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Marc T. Tanenberg, Chief Financial Officer of APAC Customer Services, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of APAC Customer Services, Inc.

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over reporting, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: March 12, 2004 |  | /s/MARC T. TANENBERGMarc T. Tanenberg
Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 21.1**SUBSIDIARIES OF APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.****As of December 31, 2006**APAC Customer Services, Inc.          APAC Customer Services, L.L.C. (99% owned)               APAC Customer Services of Texas, L.P. (99% owned)          APAC Customer Services of Illinois, Inc. (100% owned)               APAC Customer Services, L.L.C. (1% owned)          APAC Customer Services General Partner, Inc. (100% owned)               APAC Customer Services of Texas, L.P. (1% owned)          ITI Holdings, LLC (100% owned)          APAC Customer Services of Iowa, L.L.C. (100% owned)       APacific Customer Services Phils., Inc. (40% ownership by APAC Customer Services, Inc. and60% ownership by certain individual partners of Philippine counsel from Angara AbelloConcepion Regala & Cruz Law Offices (ACCRALAW®)
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5868]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below are assigned to the United States 
Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy and are 
available for licensing by the Department of the Navy.
    The following patent is available for licensing: Patent application 
12/793,503: AUTO ADJUSTING RANGING DEVICE (a ranging system for use 
with a projectile launching device).

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 
47522-5001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface 
Warfare Center, Crane Div, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 
47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

    Dated: March 2, 2012.
L.M. Senay,
Lieutenant, Office of the Judge Advocate, U.S. Navy, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-5868 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
|   | (1) |   | The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for                    the period ended September 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                    the                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,                    in all                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                         |                                                                           |                       |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                         | **VALLEY                      FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant) |
|                         |                                                                           |                       |
| Date: November 13, 2007 | By:                                                                  | /s/ Louis J. Brothers |
|                         | Louis J. Brothers                                                              |
|                         | President, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer)           |

----
|   | (1) |   | The Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for                  the period ended June 30, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents,                  in all                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                              |                                                                                        |                       |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|                              | **VALLEY FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant)                                   |
|                              |                                                                                        |                       |
| Dated: August 13, 2007  | By:                                                                               | /s/ Louis J. Brothers |
|                              | Louis J. Brothers                                                                           |
|                              | President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer)(Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of NCI, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, to the best of his knowledge and belief pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2010 |  | /s/ CHARLES K. NARANG                                                                            
|                     |  | Charles K. Narang
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NCI, Inc. and will be retained by NCI, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jordan Welsh, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Razor Resources Inc.
      for the period ended July 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Razor Resources Inc.                                                                

Dated: September 12, 2008



| | /s/ Jordan Welsh                                               
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Jordan Welsh                                                   
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director                
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Razor Resources Inc.                                           



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Razor Resources
Inc. and will be retained by Razor Resources Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-4155

___________

Heather Patrice Hogrobrooks, *

*

Movant-Appellant, *

*

David Rogers; Janice M. Rogers, *

*

Plaintiffs, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the 

v. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

*

Bobby Carter, Individually and in his * [UNPUBLISHED]

official capacity as a Forrest City Police *

Officer; City of Forrest City, Arkansas, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 1, 2000

 Filed: December 22, 2000

___________

Before BEAM, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was filed by attorney Heather Hogrobrooks, purportedly on behalf

of plaintiff David Rogers and herself, challenging the district court’s1 dismissal of
-2-

Rogers’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after it was settled out of court, because

Hogrobrooks was not awarded attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. We agree with

the district court that the client, not the attorney, has the right to seek an award of

attorney’s fees under section 1988, and the client may waive that right in a settlement.

See Evans v. Jeff D., 475 U.S. 717, 730-31 & n.19 (1986) (§ 1988 vests right to

attorney’s fees in prevailing party and not party’s lawyer); Wray v. Clarke, 151 F.3d

807, 809 (8th Cir. 1998) (although attorneys’ fees are available to civil rights

complainant who prevails through settlement in lieu of litigation, such fees may be

waived as part of settlement process); Brown v. Gen. Motors Corp., 722 F.2d 1009,

1010-11 (2d Cir. 1983) (where client fired attorney prior to settlement, attorney could

not claim fees in his own name under § 1988; attorney’s entitlement to fees depends

upon contractual arrangement between attorney and client).

In this case, client Rogers made no application to the district court for an

attorney’s fee award under section 1988. Hogrobrooks does not now represent Rogers,

nor did she represent him when the case was settled, and she has no independent right

to seek a section 1988 attorney’s fee award. Thus, as the district court recognized,

whatever right Hogrobrooks may have to a portion of the settlement proceeds by reason

of her representation of Rogers earlier in the lawsuit is a matter of state law. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the settled case in its entirety,

leaving Hogrobrooks to pursue any such state law remedies in a separate action.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We grant Rogers’s motion to

remove the designation of him as “appellant.”
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40695

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN SANTOS-QUINTERO, also known as Arturo Lara Santos

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:08-CR-84-ALL

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Santos-Quintero (Santos) has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Santos has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk