alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  In connection with the quarterly report of Z Yachts, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this



14th day of August 2008.   /s/Anthony K. Welch ______________________________  Anthony K. Welch Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

|Name of Subsidiary                                                                 |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc.                                                      |  | New Jersey                   
|Chesapeake Bagel Franchise Corp.
(f/k/a Chesapeake Bagel Bakery Acquisition Corp.) |  | New Jersey                   
|Willoughby's Incorporated                                                          |  | Connecticut                  
|New World ENBCDEB Corp.(1)                                                         |  | New York                     
|Einstein and Noah Corp.
(f/k/a Einstein Acquisition Corp.)                         |  | Delaware                     
|Einstein/Noah Bagel Partners, Inc.                                                 |  | California                   
|I. & J. Bagel, Inc.                                                                |  | California                   

---

---

QuickLinks
#### EILEEN DEMARIA *v.*JOSEPH L. DEMARIA

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15912.

*David P. Ball,*in support of the petition.

Decided April 15, 1998

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn. App. 729 (AC 17025), is granted, limited to the following issue:

> “Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly render a judgment terminating alimony to a cohabiting spouse where there was no showing that the cohabiting spouse’s financial needs had changed?”
#### SARGENT et al. v. SWOPE, Warden.

No. 9263.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 12, 1939.

Nathan F. and Clifford L. Sargent, in propria persona.

J. Charles Dennis, U. S. Atty., and Oliver Malm, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Tacoma, Wash., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to free appellants from imprisonment on conviction of the crimes of manufacturing and passing counterfeit silver coins. Appellants petitioned the district judge for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, the prisoners brought before the court, and the appellee warden appeared and showed cause for the imprisonment.

The petition for the writ, verified by both petitioners, alleged that the petitioners had pleaded guilty to the charge, after advising the court they needed the assistance of counsel and were denied such counsel, and were advised by the court, “This court does not appoint counsel.”

The burden of proof was on petitioners to establish these facts. Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 468, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461. There is evidence of one of the petitioners flatly contradicting the allegation concerning their request to the court in which they were convicted and the alleged remark of the district judge which, if believed, made liars, if not perjurers, of the petitioners and entitled the court below *178to reject their testimony as a whole and to hold that their burden of proof had not been maintained. We find no error.

Affirmed.
DALAIN HOWELL

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5281

Opinion filed May 5, 2017.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Dalain Howell, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for bela ted appeal is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            
            
            U.S. Air Force
                    U.S. Air Force
        Search
                    Search AF.mil:
                        Search
                Search AF.mil:
                    Search
    Home





    News
    
        Commentaries

    Features

    Photos

    Art

    Air Force TV

    Radio

    Week in Photos

    Coronavirus Disease 2019





    About Us
    
        Air Force Senior Leaders    
        SECAF

    CSAF

    CMSAF

    Biographies

    Adjunct Professors

    Fact Sheets

    Commander's Call Topics    
        CCT Archive

    CSAF Reading List    
        2018 CSAF Reading List

    2017 CSAF Reading List

    2016 CSAF Reading List

    2015 CSAF Reading List

    2014 CSAF Reading List

    2013 CSAF Reading List

    2012 CSAF Reading List

    2011 CSAF Reading List

    2010 CSAF Reading List

    2009 CSAF Reading List

    2008 CSAF Reading List

    2007 CSAF Reading List

    2006 CSAF Reading List

    50 Years of the CMSAF

    The Book

    Speeches Archive    
        Former AF Top 3 Viewpoints and Speeches

    Air Force Warrior Games 2019

    Air Force Strategic Documents

    Desert Storm 25th Anniversary

    DoD Warrior Games

    Portraits in Courage    
        Portraits In Courage Vol. I

    Portraits In Courage Vol. II

    Portraits In Courage Vol. III

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IV

    Portraits In Courage Vol. V

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VI

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. VIII

    Portraits In Courage Vol. IX

    Portraits In Courage Vol. X

    Chapman MoH

    The Air Force We Need

    Events 2020

    Focus on Priorities





    AF Sites
    
        Social Media Sites

    Site Registration





    AF Content Management





    Careers  
 Home
  News
  Photos
 Air Force Photos Search
 Search
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Full Size (2.66 MB)
 
 Silent Sentry al Udeid Air Base Operation Inherent Resolve Centcom Deployed
 Photo Gallery
 Quick Links
                            Join the Air ForceSite MapQuestionsContact UsRSSFOIAIGAF SitesAccessibilityEEOLink DisclaimerStrategic APRSuicide PreventionSAPRUSA.govNo FEAR Act
                    Connect
                    Official United States Air Force Website
                        Subscribe to USAF News and Information
          Submit
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 1 (Friday, January 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 33]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30745]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase from People Who are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action adds products to the Procurement List that will be 
furnished by the nonprofit agency employing persons who are blind or 
have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Effective February 2, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Additions

    On 11/28/2015 (79 FR 70856-70857), the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed 
additions to the Procurement List.
    After consideration of the material presented to it concerning 
capability of qualified nonprofit agency to provide the products and 
impact of the additions on the current or most recent contractors, the 
Committee has determined that the products listed below are suitable 
for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501-8506 and 
41 CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in any additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities other 
than the small organization that will furnish the products to the 
Government.
    2. The action will result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the products to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506) in connection with the products proposed for addition to the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following products are added to the Procurement 
List:

Products:

NSN: MR 10666--Thermos, 25 oz, Licensed
NSN: MR 10667--Tumbler, Drinking, 16 oz, Licensed
NSN: MR 10668--Jar, Drinking, 19 oz, Licensed
NSN: Winston-Salem Industries for the Blind, Inc., Winston-Salem, NC
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA
Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, 
VA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-30745 Filed 12-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Danny McQueen, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (West, J.), rendered February 6, 1986, convicting him of rape in the first degree (three counts), sodomy in the first degree, attempted sodomy in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree, sexual abuse in the first degree, and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after separate hearings, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds and to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We find unpersuasive the defendant’s contention that the 14-month delay between the date of the crime and the com*567mencement of criminal proceedings deprived him of due process *(see, People v Montez,*167 AD2d 356). The record establishes that probable cause to arrest the defendant did not exist until approximately 14 months after the crime. There is nothing in the record to suggest that the police deliberately delayed in arresting the defendant in order to obtain a tactical advantage *(see, People v Montez, supra; People v Bryant,*65 AD2d 333), nor is there any concrete showing that the defendant was precluded from presenting a viable defense at trial as a result of the delay *(see, People v Montez, supra; People v Bonsauger,*91 AD2d 1001).

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that the court improperly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony. A review of the evidence adduced at the *Wade*hearing reveals that the photographic identification procedures employed by the police were not unduly suggestive *(see, People v Blake,*170 AD2d 613; *People v Bullard,*146 AD2d 582). In any event, the hearing court’s determination that each of the complaining witnesses had an independent basis for in-court identification of the defendant is amply supported by the record *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 241, 252; *People v Armstead,*98 AD2d 726).

Similarly unavailing is the defendant’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. The case against the defendant included, among other things, the logical and consistent testimony of the two eyewitness-complainants and one of the defendant’s accomplices. Accordingly, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

Finally, we find the sentences imposed upon the defendant to be neither unduly harsh nor excessive under the circumstances of this case *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Hutchinson, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Antonio Brandveen, J.), rendered April 26, 1989, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an indeterminate prison term of *4-Vz*to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

During a "buy and bust” operation, an undercover police officer bought two vials of crack from defendant with prerecorded money. Minutes after the sale, the officer returned to his car and radioed a description of defendant to his back-up team, after which defendant was arrested. The pre-recorded buy money was recovered from defendant.

While defendant claims that his guilt was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and that he merely witnessed a drug transaction between other individuals, the jury obviously credited the officers’ testimony. Reviewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, and considering that the jury’s determination of credibility is entitled to great deference by this Court *(People v Patterson,*155 AD2d 363), it is clear that the jury’s determination should not be disturbed on appeal. *364Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Rosenberger, Ross and Smith, JJ.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED R.R. AND S. B

. ,

Appellant s ,
v. Case No. 5D 16

- 4148 NEW LIFE COMMUNITY CHURCH OF CMA, INC., PRISCILLA HEFFIELD, RON HEFFIELD, DANIEL HEFFIELD, CHRISTIAN AND MISSIONARY ALLIANCE, INC., ET AL. ,

Appellee s

.

_ ____ _______________________ ________ / Opinion filed May 18, 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County , Donald A. Myers, Jr. , Judge. Susan W. Fox , of Fox & Loquasto, P

. A

. , Orlando, Wendy S. Loquasto, of Fox & Loquasto, P.A

. , Tallahassee, Griffith J. Winthrop, III, of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A. , Orlando, and John K . Overchuck , of Overchuck Law Firm , Orlando, for Appellant s

. David J. Pascuzzi and Steven G. Schwartz, of The Schwartz Law Group, Boca Raton, for Appellees, New L ife Community Church of CMA, Inc. and Ron Heffield. Scott A. Cole and Melinda S. Thornton , of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P

. A ., Miami , for Appellee , Priscilla Heffield

. Michael R. D'Lugo, of Wicker , Smith, O'Hara, McCoy & Ford, P.A., Orlando, for2

Appellee, The Christian and Missionary Alliance, Inc. Michael A. Sastre and Christian M. Leger, of GrayR obinson, P.A., Miami, for Appellee, The Southeastern District of the Christian and Missionary Allianc e. No Appearance for other Appellees

.
PER CURIAM. R.R. and S.B. appeal the partial summary judgment on their negligence and respondeat superior claims against the parents and employer of the alleged abuser in this child sexual abuse case. We are compelled to affirm because the claims were time

barred by the four

- year statute of limitations outlined in section 95.11(3)(a), (p), Florida S tatutes (1996). In reaching this conclusion, 1 we align ourselves with the Second District
in D .H. ex rel. R.H. v. Adept Community Services , Inc. , 217 So. 3d 1072, 1077

- 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) , and certify conflict with Doe v. Nur

- Ul

- Islam Academy, Inc

. , 217 So. 3d 85, 90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) , and Drake ex rel. Fletcher v . Island Community Church, Inc. , 462 So. 2d 1142, 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). We recognize that the Florida Supreme Court has accepted jurisdiction to review the conflict between the holding in D.H. and the holdings in Nur

- Ul

- Islam Academy and Drake

. See D.H. v. Adept Cmty. Servs., Inc. , No. SC17

- 829, 2017 WL 4325848, at *1 (Fla. Sept. 29, 2017). AFFIRMED and CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

1 We note that even if we w ere to adopt Appellants' argument as to section 95.051(1)(i), Florida Statutes (2011), Appellants' negligence and respondeat superior claims were filed beyond the seven

- year repose period provided for in the statute. Likewise, their alternative argument, based on section 95.11(9), Florida Statutes ( 2010) , fails because the subsection does not apply to actions that would have been time

- barred on or before July 1, 2010.3

TORPY , BERGER and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

---

# Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Atlantic Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), certifies that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

|1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date:  May 11, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask
|------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                    |  | Robert P. Trask           
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer   

|Date:  May 11, 2006 |  | By:   /s/  Robert P. Trask 
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|                    |  | Robert P. Trask            
|                    |  | Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at (9/30/97, 6/30/97, 3/31/97)(unaudited) and the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the (nine months ended 9/30/97, the
six months ended 6/30/97, and the three months ended 3/31/97)(unaudited) and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000949244
<NAME> ALTERNATE POSTAL DELIVERY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                      <C>             <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS           6-MOS             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        DEC-31-1997     DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>           JAN-01-1997     JAN-01-1997       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>             SEP-30-1997     JUN-30-1997       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                       1,242           1,344             2,001
<SECURITIES>                     0               0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                2,679           2,736             3,027
<ALLOWANCES>                    70              64               102
<INVENTORY>                      0               0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             4,136           4,213             5,259
<PP&E>                         995             936               895
<DEPRECIATION>                 742             713               686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               5,655           5,744             6,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1,755           1,764             2,772
<BONDS>                          0               0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0               0                 0
<PREFERRED>                      0               0                 0
<COMMON>                     8,386           8,386             8,386
<OTHER-SE>                  (4,491)         (4,507)           (4,546)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 5,655           5,744             6,791
<SALES>                          0               0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>            13,826           9,398             4,046
<CGS>                            0               0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>               10,248           6,965             2,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 0               0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0               0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              18              16                11
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 27               9               (31)
<INCOME-TAX>                    (1)             (2)               (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             28              11               (28)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0               0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 38              38                38
<CHANGES>                        0               0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                    66              49                10
<EPS-PRIMARY>                  .02             .01               .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                  .02             .01               .00
        

</TABLE>