alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Deanie J. Underwood, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of By Design,
Inc., certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB;





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-a5(e)) for the
small business issuer and have;





(a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure the material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation





(c)  Disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent
fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting; and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or person performing the
equivalent functions);





(a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process
summarize and report financial information; and





(b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over
financial reporting.





Dated:
May 16, 2008









By:
            /s/ Deanie
      J. UnderwoodDeanie
      J. Underwood
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              Chief
      Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2231 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2231

     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydration systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDRATION SYSTEMS WITH A CARGO STORAGE EXCEEDING 
              2200 CUBIC INCHES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Insulated           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          hydration systems                                                  31/2011.......
                          with an outer
                          surface of
                          textile materials
                          whose interior
                          incorporates a
                          flexible plastic
                          container of a
                          kind for storing
                          and dispensing
                          potable beverages
                          through attached
                          flexible tubing
                          and which have a
                          cargo storage
                          capacity
                          exceeding 2200
                          cubic inches
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.92.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Zandaria  Ventures  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September  30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(
d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November 12, 2008


/s/ Jason Smart
-----------------------------------
Jason Smart
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Accounting Officer



-------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### Marine Office of America Corp., Respondent, v Marval Import Corporation, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered April 25, 1990, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability and referred the matter to a Special Referee to hear and determine the amount of premiums due to plaintiff, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Order of the same court, entered November 2, 1990, which upon reargument, adhered to its prior decision, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff issued an Ocean Marine policy of insurance to defendant. After the policy was terminated, plaintiff audited *411defendant’s books and determined that it was entitled to over $30,000 in additional premiums since certain unreported shipments were covered by plaintiffs policy. Defendant contends that the shipments at issue were excluded from plaintiffs policy since the suppliers agreed to bear the risk of loss with regard to these shipments.

In reliance on this Court’s decision in *United States Fire Ins. Co. v Commodore Mfg. Corp.*(81 AD2d 562, *after remand*108 AD2d 621), the IAS Court granted summary judgment on the issue of liability in favor of plaintiff.

Defendant urges that *United States Fire Ins. Co. (supra)*is distinguishable, since the letters from the suppliers indicating that they would bear the risk of loss were accompanied by an affidavit of an employee of one of the suppliers. In *United States Fire Ins. Co.,*we noted that there was no direct testimony from representatives of the suppliers. *(Supra,*at 622.) We disagree. The affidavit adds little in contrast to the invoices which are part of the record. (There were no invoices for the Court to review in *United States Fire Ins. Co. v Commodore Mfg. Corp., supra.)*The invoices clearly indicated that the shipments in question were made on F.O.B. terms. In other words, the risk of loss was to be borne by the buyer. There is no indication on the invoices that any other type of marine insurance is in effect. Moreover, defendant could have notified plaintiff that the shipments at issue were excluded from the policy prior to the actual making of the shipments. However, plaintiff was first advised of the purported exclusion of these shipments after the policy expired.

Defendant also claims that the IAS Court erroneously appointed a Special Referee and thereby deprived defendant of its right to a jury trial on the essential issue in the case. However, as liability was already determined, the Referee was directed only to hear and determine the premiums due plaintiff. Accordingly, the Referee is only performing a mathematical calculation pursuant to the terms of the policy and is not depriving defendant of its right to a jury trial on an essential issue. *(See,*CPLR 4317 [b].)

We have considered all other claims and find them to be meritless. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Smith, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-3037

___________________________

Valerie LeMaster

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Ditech Financial LLC, formerly known as Green Tree Servicing LLC; Federal

National Mortgage Association; Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: September 25, 2019

Filed: November 1, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Valerie LeMaster appeals the district court’s

1

dismissal of her action against

the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Federal National Mortgage

Association (Fannie Mae), and Ditech Financial, LLC (Ditech). After receiving

notice of Ditech’s commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, this court stayed the

appeal except as to LeMaster’s claim against the CFPB seeking to enforce the terms

of a consent order. 

After careful review, we note that the CFPB preserved consumers’ ability to

pursue a private cause of action. We thus conclude the district court did not err in

applying the principle in Pure Country, Inc. v. Sigma Chi Fraternity, 312 F.3d 952,

958 (8th Cir. 2002), to the facts of this case. Further, we find no merit to LeMaster’s

argument that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the CFPB without

allowing her to conduct requested discovery. See Lakin v. Prudential Sec., Inc., 348

F.3d 704, 713 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review). We affirm the dismissal only as

to the CFPB. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The appeal remains stayed as to Fannie Mae and

Ditech. 

______________________________

1The Honorable JohnR. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States DistrictCourtfor

the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

-2-
#### Gaetana Fagiola et al., Appellants, v Ole T. Jonassen et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated March 14, 1989, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

After the jurors had begun their deliberations, several notes were sent by the foreperson of the jury to the trial court. The plaintiffs’ attorney did not request that the jurors be instructed to suspend their deliberations until after a response to these notes had been formulated, nor did the plaintiffs’ attorney object when, prior to the court’s having responded to these notes, the jury announced that it was prepared to return a verdict. The plaintiffs’ argument that the trial court erred in proceeding to accept the jury verdict is, under these circumstances, beyond the scope of appellate review as a question of law. If we were to reach the issue as a matter of discretion, we would conclude that the court in fact committed no error in accepting the jury’s verdict, in light of the fact that the foreperson had informed the court that the jury no longer had any need of the assistance which it had requested in the notes *(see, Gonzalez v Colella,*55 AD2d 534; *see also, Silverstein v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth.,*159 AD2d 452).

We have examined the plaintiffs’ remaining contention and *591find it to be without merit *(see generally, Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Kunzeman and Kooper, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 24.01




POWER OF ATTORNEY




By signing this Form 10-K below, I hereby appoint Victor Zhou as my attorney-in-fact to sign all amendments to this Form 10-K on my behalf, and to file this Form 10-K (including all exhibits and other documents related to the Form 10-K) with the Securities and Exchange Commission. I authorize each of my attorneys-in-fact
to (1) appoint a substitute attorney-in-fact for himself and (2) perform any actions that he believes are necessary or appropriate to carry out the intention and purpose of this Power of Attorney. I ratify and confirm all lawful actions taken directly or indirectly by my attorneys-in-fact and by any properly appointed substitute attorneys-in-fact.




Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.




Name
Title
Date/s/ WILSON W. S. LI
Wilson W. S. Li
Director
September 14, 2009/s/ CHANGZHI JU
Changzhi Ju
Director
September 14, 2009/s/ ZHENYU HU
Zhenyu Hu
Director
September 14, 2009/s/ GEORGE XU
George Xu
Director
September 14, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2089 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2089

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of 
                           perfluorocarbons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain mixtures of 
                           perfluorocarbons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MIXTURES OF PERFLUOROCARBONS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Mixtures of C5-C18  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        perfluorocarbon                                                    31/2011.......
                        alkanes,
                        perfluorocarbon
                        amines, and/or
                        perfluorocarbon
                        ethers (CAS No.
                        86508-42-1)
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        3824.90.92)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-36659) of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus of our report dated February 12, 1997, except for the second
paragraph of Note 11, as to which the date is March 26, 1997, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Argyle Television, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 1996 included in this Annual Report. (Form 10-K)
of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

February 27, 1998
San Antonio, Texas
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of Harry & David
Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 27, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned
officers certifies that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the
periods presented in the Report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 5, 2010



By:

/S/ STEVEN J. HEYERSteven J. HeyerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/ EDWARD F. DUNLAPEdward F. DunlapChief Financial Officer
Docket No. FAA - 2012 - 0997
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated September 28, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on October 7, 2011, 76 FR 62449, National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject, University of Mississippi, 135 Coy Waller Lab Complex, University, Mississippi 38677, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleMarihuana (7360)
ITetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
I
 The company plans to cultivate marihuana for the National Institute on Drug Abuse for research approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated National Center for Natural Products Research-NIDA MProject to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: February 29, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-5441 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
From: Sullivan, Margaret 

Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 7:36 AM

Subject: Publication of AHAM-2 Test Procedure SNOPR

Dear Stakeholders:

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) will hold a public meeting to discuss and receive comments on 

issues presented in a rulemaking to establish amendments test procedures for clothes dryers and room 

air conditioners. The public meeting will be held on Wednesday, July 14, 2010, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 

p.m. at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245, 1000 Independence Avenue, 

SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. 

The notice was published in the Federal Register on June 29, 2010 and contains instructions for 

submitting comments. The 60-day public comment period ends August 30, 2010. The notice of public 

meeting, framework document, and further information about the meeting is available on DOE’s website 

at the following link: 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/clothes_dryers_room_ac_test_sn

opr_meeting.html

Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE headquarters are subject to advance security screening 

procedures. If you are a foreign national and wish to attend this meeting, please inform DOE of this fact 

by contacting Brenda Edwards as soon as possible, at (202) 586-2945.

Regards,

Margaret Sullivan

General Engineer

US Department of Energy

(202) 287-1604

Margaret.Sullivan@ee.doe.gov

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0010 COMMENT 17
# 111' 2"

205' 8"

222' 2"94' 0" 

# 70' 4"27' 10" 

# 117' 1"46' 4"33' 6"125' 6"9' 5"8' 5"



# 31' 6"67' 10" 

# 220' 2"247' 4"