alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2235

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain educational toys or devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain educational toys or devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL TOYS OR DEVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subheading 9902.85.43 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain educational toys or 
devices) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``0.55%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) in the effective period column, by striking ``12/31/
        2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2239

LEONARD L. CLAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KENNETH RILEY, ILA Local Union 1422,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:16-cv-03038-DCN)

Submitted: May 24, 2018 Decided: May 29, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Clay, Appellant Pro Se. Allan Riley Holmes, Sr., Cheryl H. Ledbetter, GIBBS 

& HOLMES, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard L. Clay appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action 

alleging employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Clay’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district 

court’s disposition, Clay has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson 

v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important 

document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that 

brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Anthony J. Farina, Respondent, v Hugh Nastasi et al., Defendants, and Lewis Brenner, Appellant.

In an action to recover a brokerage commission, the defendant Lewis Brenner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), entered July 19, 1989, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $59,780.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant contends, *inter alia,*that the jury verdict is both unsupported by legally sufficient evidence and against the weight of the credible evidence. We disagree.

The appellant does not contest that plaintiff broker earned a commission but claims that it was not he, but rather the purchaser who agreed to pay for the successful negotiation of the sale of the appellant’s business. Although it constitutes evidence that a brokerage agreement was made and performed *(see, Cohon & Co. v Russell,*23 NY2d 569; *see also, Crabtree v Arden Sales Corp.,*305 NY 48), the "hold harmless” clause in the contract of the sale whereby the purchaser agreed to indemnify the appellant for payment of the commission is not dispositive of the issue of who is obligated to pay the commission. The testimony at trial establishes that, as between the plaintiff and the appellant, the latter owed a duty to the former to pay the commission. Since it cannot be said that no valid line of reasoning could lead to the conclusion that the appellant agreed to pay the plaintiffs commission *(see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499; *cf., Cohon & Co. v Russell, supra)*and since a "fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129, 136), supports the verdict in the plaintiffs favor, the verdict was both supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence.

The appellant’s contention that the Supreme Court should have granted his oral application, made after the plaintiff rested, to amend his answer so as to include the Statute of Frauds as an affirmative defense, is without merit *(cf., Cohon & Co. v Russell, supra; see,*CPLR 3018 [b]; *cf.,*CPLR 3211 [a] [5], [8]; *see also, Simis v Wissel,*10 App Div 323). Further, the court did not err in refusing to admit into evidence two letters which were written by the plaintiffs attorney to the appellant’s attorney prior to the commencement of this suit. A plaintiffs prelitigation speculations as to whom he might sue *521have no relevance to and are not inconsistent with the liability of the defendant who is actually sued *(see, Goodman v Vizsla Club,*73 AD2d 637, 638).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPLR 5501 [3]) or do not warrant reversal. Kooper, J. P., Sullivan, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
#### Sheila TIEDER and Richard Tieder, Administrators of the Estate of Trudi Beth Tieder, deceased, Appellants, v. Robert M. LITTLE, Appellee.

No. 88-298.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Nov. 8, 1988.

Bryan Scott Henry, Lauderhill, for appellants.

Kubicki, Bradley, Draper, Gallagher & McGrane and Betsy E. Gallagher, Miami, for appellees.

Before NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ., and GAVIN K. LETTS, Associate Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of *American Liberty Ins. Co. v. West & Conyers, Architects & Engineers,*491 So.2d 573 (Fla.2d DCA 1986).
#### STATE ex rel. James JARVIS v. Warden DEES.

No. 89-KH-0194.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Jan. 25, 1989.

In re Jarvis, James; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 09-88-979.

The application is transferred to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, for consideration and action.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00767

- CV
Christina Marie DIAZ , Appellant

v. Felipe G. DIAZ , Appellee From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1992

- CI

- 04150 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 27, 2019
DIS MISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION Appellant Christina Marie Diaz filed a notice of appeal in this court on October 29 , 201 9

. Appellant was required to pay $ 20 5 .00 in filing fee s to this court

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5. 1 Appellant did not timely pay the required fee s

. On November 2 7 , 201 9 , when the fee s remained unpaid, we ordered A ppellant to provide written proof to this court not later than Dec ember 9 ,

1 See also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 51.207(b)(1) (filing fee $100.00); id. §§ 51.0051 , .208 (additional fee $50.00); id. § 51. 851(b) (electronic filing fee $20.00); id. § 51.941(a) (services for indigents fee $25.00) ; Texas Supreme Cour t Order Regarding Fees Charged i n Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

– 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007) , reprinted in T EX

. R. A PP

. P. app. A § B.l.(a).04

- 19

- 00767

- CV

- 2

- 201 9 , that the filing fees ha ve been paid or Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the filing
fees. See id. We warned Appellant that if s he failed to respond as ordered, the appeal w ould be
dismissed without further notice. See id. R. 5, 42.3; In re W.J.C. , No. 04

- 05

- 00532

- CV, 2005 WL 3477883, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio Dec. 21, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.). To date, Appellant has not paid the fees or filed any response with this cour t

. Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                               Exhibit 10a



                   Assignment of Intellectual Property Rights

                      Fuel-Tech N.V. to Platinum Plus, Inc.

                             As of November 5, 1997


     Fuel-Tech N.V., a Netherlands Antilles limited liability company "Assignor"
(the "Company"), does hereby, as a capital contribution, assign to its
wholly-owned subsidiary Platinum Plus, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Assignee"), all of the Companys right, title and interest whatsoever in the
United States of America and in any other jurisdiction worldwide, in and to:

     1. That certain License Agreement effective as of October 28, 1994 between
the Company and Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (the "License").

     2. All of the intellectual property, including patents, patent applications
technology, data and know-how, set forth on Schedule A to the License.

     3. The assignee agrees to accept this assignment and to hold Assignor
harmless from any cost or expense required to prosecute, maintain or exploit the
property described in Section 2 above.

     4. Assignor agrees to cooperate with Assignee at the expense of the
Assignee in perfecting the assignments made herein and to execute and deliver to
the Assignee any further agreements, assignments, instruments, certificates and
other documents deemed necessary or appropriate for that purpose by the
Assignee.

     5. By this assignment the Assignee is the owner of the assigned property in
all respects and may deal with such property as it shall deem appropriate.



                                 FUEL-TECH N.V.


Dated: December 19, 1997         By: /s/ Jeremy D. Peter-Hoblyn
                                     --------------------------------------
                                         Jeremy D. Peter-Hoblyn
                                         Managing Director

Agreed to this 19 day of December, 1997

Platinum Plus, Inc.

By: /s/ James M. Valentine
    ------------------------------
        James M. Valentine
        Executive Vice President


<PAGE>




State of Connecticut :
                     )  ss Stamford
County of Fairfield  :


The within instrument was acknowledged before me this 19th day of December 1997
by Jeremy D. Peter-Hoblyn, Managing Director of Fuel-Tech N.V., a Netherlands
Antilles corporation, and James M. Valentine, Executive Vice President of
Platinum Plus, Inc., a Delaware corporation, on behalf of their respective
corporations.



                                 /s/ Charles W. Grinnell
                                 --------------------------------------
                                     Charles W. Grinnell
                                     Commissioner of the Superior Court
# Fourth Court of Appea **ls**

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 14, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00427

- CV

CRAWFORD MEDICAL SUPPLIES, LLC , Sam Maddali, Prem Swaroop Kalidindi, and

Maddali Realty, LLC,

Appellant s

v.

HUNTLEIGH HOME MEDICAL, LTD. and Jane Elizabeth Flores,

Appellees

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 00404

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED.

The appellee ’ s brief is due on September 2 6, 2015.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of September, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### James D. KOELEMAY v. Curtis A. WARREN, Clerk of Court, First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo.

No. 88-KH-1692.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

April 21, 1989.

In re Koelemay, James D.; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Caddo, 1st Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, Nos. 97580, 98132, 108077.

Granted in part; denied in part; transferred in part. Relator’s request for production of his sentencing transcript is denied for failure to show a particularized need. Relator’s request for his signed plea agreements is granted and the district court is ordered to furnish relator with copies of the agreements. Relator’s request for his *883
      *Boykin*transcripts is transferred to the district court for enforcement of its order of April 18, 1988.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 15098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6112]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR12-8-000]


Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership; Notice of Filing of 
Supplement to Facilities Surcharge Settlement

    Take notice that on March 2, 2012, Enbridge Energy, Limited 
Partnership (Enbridge Energy) with the support of the Canadian 
Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), tendered for filing a 
Supplement to the Facilities Surcharge Settlement approved by the 
Commission on June 30, 2004, in Docket No. OR04-2-000, at 107 FERC ] 
61,336 (2004).
    Any person desiring to comment on this Supplement to the Settlement 
should file its intervention or protest with the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. 
Initial comments must be filed no later than 5 p.m. Eastern Time on 
Wednesday, March 14, 2012. Reply comments will be due on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on Monday, March 19, 2012.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC
    Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87c1c2d5c4c8e9ebeee9e2d4f2f7f7e8f5f3c7e1e2f5e4a9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="763033243539181a1f181325030606190402361013041558111900">[email protected]</span></a>. or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 7, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6112 Filed 3-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2093 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Perfluorobutane sulfonyl fluoride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Perfluorobutane sulfonyl 

fluoride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERFLUOROBUTANE SULFONYL FLUORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Perfluorobutanesulfonyl fluoride (CAS No. 375–72–4) 

(provided for in subheading 

2904.10.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2093 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 24, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00068

- CR

Demarcus Kresean Jordan, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES , JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the trial court’s

judg ment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment

of the trial court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decisio n be certified

below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

   In connection with the Annual Report of Central Parking Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Jeff
Heavrin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                              /s/ JEFF HEAVRIN
                              ------------------------
                              Jeff Heavrin
                              Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO CENTRAL PARKING CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY CENTRAL PARKING
CORPORATION AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF
UPON REQUEST.

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. This certification is executed as of December 29, 2005.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2253 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2253

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2138

            To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Toluidine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on o-Toluidine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. O-TOLUIDINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      o-Toluidine (CAS    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        No. 95-53-4)                                                       31/2011.......
                        (provided for in
                        2921.43.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```