alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2006086EN.01001701.xml

| 24.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 86/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 86/17

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 484/2006

of 23 March 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 17 to 23 March 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1058/2005.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 24 March 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 174, 7.7.2005, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2169 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2169

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trimethylopropane tris(3-
                         aziridinylpropanoate).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on trimethylopropane tris(3-
                         aziridinylpropanoate).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIMETHYLOPROPANE TRIS(3-AZIRIDINYLPROPANOATE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to trimethylopropane tris(3-
aziridinylpropanoate)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

June 16, 2010

Mr. Karl Seuring Managing Director The Leading Edge Group, LLC 3425 Carillon Point Kirkland, WA 98033

Dear Mr. Seuring:
This letter is to inform you that, becaus e the FAA has not received a re-petition for exemption per, and within the 30-day re sponse time described in, our previous correspondence of April 15, 2010, we are clos ing the project for docket no. FAA-2010- 0309. If you choose to reply to this matter in the fu ture, please reference th e above docket number in your correspondence and petition, a nd we will restart the project. If you have questions in the meantime, you may call Ian Won at (425) 227-2145, e-mail ian.won@faa.gov.

Sincerely,

/s/

Franklin Tiangsing Manager, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch Transport Standards Staff Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7281
ANTHONY HUGH CARTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN R. WILLIAMS; LEWIS A. BABB; LIEUTENANT CARTER; SERGEANT BOYD, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-400-5-H) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Hugh Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing three of four Defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00092-CR

Brian Ross, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-12-302211, HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Brian Ross no longer wishes to pursue this appeal and has filed a motion

to dismiss. We grant the motion and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________

Jeff Rose, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 24, 2014

Do Not Publish
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017145EN.01002602.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 145/26 |

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EC) No 1801/2006 of 30 November 2006 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 8 December 2006](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2006_343_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, in Article 4, footnote 2:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(2) | Plus the sum of the contributions to be paid by shipowners as provided for in Chapter III of Annex I, paid directly to Mauritania into the account provided for in Chapter IV of Annex I, which is estimated at EUR 22 million per year.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(2) | The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.’. |

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5601]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Acquisition Regulations System

48 CFR Part 215

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense 
(DoD).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD is making a technical amendment to the Defense Federal 
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add text and a reference 
to a memorandum from the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition 
Policy.

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2011.

Applicability Date: All solicitations for competitive, negotiated 
acquisitions issued after July 1, 2011, are subject to these 
procedures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ynette Shelkin, Defense 
Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-8384; 
facsimile 703-602-0350.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends DFARS by adding a 
section at 215.300 with a reference to Director, Defense Procurement 
and Acquisition Policy memorandum dated March 4, 2011, Department of 
Defense Source Selection Procedures. The memorandum provides mandatory 
requirements for conducting competitively negotiated acquisitions under 
FAR part 15 and outlines a common set of principles and procedures for 
conducting such acquisitions.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 215

    Government procurement.

Ynette R. Shelkin,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

    Therefore, 48 CFR part 215 is amended as follows:

PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 215 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

0
2. Section 215.300 is added to subpart 215.3 to read as follows:

215.300  Scope of subpart.

    Contracting officers shall follow the principles and procedures in 
Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy memorandum dated 
March 4, 2011, Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures, when 
conducting negotiated, competitive acquisitions utilizing FAR part 15 
procedures.

[FR Doc. 2011-5601 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Juan Ricciardi, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Farlo, J.), rendered February 25, 1988, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant challenges, on *Rosario*grounds, the court’s failuve to permit his counsel to personally examine the entire contents of a case folder kept by Senior Investigator Donovan of the New York State Police. The court examined the folder in camera, directed that certain documents contained in it be provided to the defendant’s counsel, and refused access to documents related to the codefendants which contained no reference to the defendant. We find that the court, following the procedure set forth in *People v Poole*(48 NY2d 144, 149), properly examined the file in camera and determined that the documents which the defendant sought to obtain were not "relevant to the subject matter of a witness’ testimony” *(People v Poole, supra,*at 149-150). There is no basis for setting aside the court’s conclusion *(see, People v Mills,*142 AD2d 653, 654).

We find no error in the trial court’s second supplemental entrapment charge *(see,*Penal Law § 40.05; *People v Romero,*136 AD2d 659, 659-660; *People v Forsman,*128 AD2d 635; 1 CJI[NY] 40.05, at 930; Charges to Jury Criminal Case § 5:12). Lastly, the defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Thompson, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Jason Reid,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jody Frank, Chief Financial Officer,
certify. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Jason Reid
              
              /s/ Jody E. FrankJason
      Reid
              
              Jody
      E. FrankPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
              
              Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      June 19, 2009
              
              Date:
      June 19, 2009
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18 U.S.C. § 1350





I, Louis J. Brothers, Chief Executive Officer of Valley Forge Composite Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:





1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto on Form 10-Q/A of the Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: April 23, 2012


By:  /s/ Louis J. Brothers


Louis J. Brothers


President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and Chairman of the Board








The information contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 10.6

                                AMENDMENT NO. 5
                                       TO
                          FREIGHTER SERVICES AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 5 to the Freighter Services Agreement dated October 1,
1994, between World Airways, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("World" or "World
Airways") and Malaysian Airline System Berhad, a Malaysian corporation ("MAS")
as amended by Amendment Number 1 thereto dated December 31, 1994, Amendment
Number 2 thereto dated February 9, 1995, Amendment No. 3 dated March 5, 1995,
and Amendment No. 4 dated July___, 1995 (collectively hereinafter referred to as
the "Agreement") is entered into this 24/th/ day of July, 1995, by and between
World Airways and MAS.

     WHEREAS, the Agreement currently provides for a monthly minimum block hour
guarantee of 400 hours per aircraft provided pursuant to this Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the parties desire to permit the aggregation of the minimum
monthly block hour guarantees per aircraft to provide for a total monthly
minimum block hour guarantee for all aircraft provided pursuant to this
Agreement; and

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other mutual
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto hereby agree to further amend the Agreement as follows:

     1.  Section 3.1 of the original Agreement dated October 1, 1994, which has
not heretofore been amended, is amended by adding the following sentence at the
end thereof:

     "The minimum monthly block hour guarantee of 400 hours may be aggregated
for all aircraft provided pursuant to this Agreement, e.g., the minimum monthly
block hour guarantee for three aircraft is 1200 block hours per month."

     2.  Except as amended hereby, all the terms and conditions set forth in the
Agreement shall remain the same and in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 5 to
be executed by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above
written.


MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BERHAD                 WORLD AIRWAYS, INC.


By: /s/ Baharudin Ngah                          By: /s/ Ahmad M. Khatib  
   -------------------------------                 ---------------------------
   Baharudin Ngah                                  Ahmad M. Khatib 
   Director-Cargo                                  Executive Vice President
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2042 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reconstituted tobacco. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reconstituted 

tobacco. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN RECONSTITUTED TOBACCO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2042 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 ‘Reconstituted’ tobacco (provided for in subheading 

2403.91.47), presented in the 

form of irregular strips or diamond shapes, certified by 

the importer (1) to contain 

50 percent or more by weight 

of United States-origin tobacco content, and (2) to 

have been manufactured in a 

paper-making type process, 

the foregoing excluding ‘products of Canada, Israel or 

Mexico’ under the terms of 

Additional U.S. Note 5(b)(i) 

to chapter 24 ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, March 15, 2012.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors 
must use Diagonal Road Entrance), Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Final Rule--Parts 701, 760 and 790 of NCUA's Rules and 
Regulations, Technical Amendments.
    2. NCUA's Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan.
    3. Quarterly Insurance Fund Report.

RECESS: 10:45 a.m.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Thursday, March 15, 2012.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Creditor Claim Appeal. Closed pursuant to exemptions (6) and 
(8).
    2. Consideration of Supervisory Activities. Closed pursuant to 
exemptions (8), (9)(i)(B) and 9(ii).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-6005 Filed 3-8-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Anderson Y. Lee, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.
Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In
giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).

Date: March 20, 2013



|       |  |                                                      
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anderson Y. Lee                                  
|Name:  |  | Anderson Y. Lee                                      
|Title: |  | Vice President and Treasurer,                        
|       |  | American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II
|       |  | (senior officer in charge of securitization)