Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules 15009 

(1) Race Area. All waters of the 

Atlantic Ocean located east of Cocoa 

Beach encompassed within an 

imaginary line connecting the following 

points: Starting at Point 1 in position 

28°22′09′′ N, 80°35′52′′ W; thence east to 

Point 2 in position 28°22′08′′ N, 

80°35′46′′ W; thence south to Point 3 in 

position 28°19′53′′ N, 80°36′02′′ W; 

thence west to Point 4 in position 

28°19′53′′ N, 80°36′08′′ W; thence north 

back to origin. 

(2) Buffer Zone. All waters of the 

Atlantic Ocean located east of Cocoa 

Beach, excluding the race area, and 

encompassed within an imaginary line 

connecting the following points: 

Starting at Point 1 in position 28°22′16′′ 

N, 80°36′04′′ W; thence east to Point 2 

in position 28°22′15′′ N, 80°35′39′′ W; 

thence south to Point 3 in position 

28°19′47′′ N, 80°35′55′′ W; thence west 

to Point 4 in position 28°19′47′′ N, 

80°36′22′′ W; thence north back to 

origin. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated areas 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Jacksonville or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Persons and vessels desiring to 

enter, transit through, anchor in, or 

remain within the regulated areas may 

contact the Captain of the Port 

Jacksonville by telephone at 904–564– 

7501, or a designated representative via 

VHF radio on channel 16, to request 

authorization. If authorization to enter, 

transit through, anchor in, or remain 

within the regulated areas is granted by 

the Captain of the Port Jacksonville or 

a designated representative, all persons 

and vessels receiving such authorization 

must comply with the instructions of 

the Captain of the Port Jacksonville or 

a designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated areas by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Enforcement Date. This rule will 

be enforced from 9 a.m. until 5:30 p.m. 

on May 20, 2012. 

Dated: February 13, 2012. 

C.A. Blomme, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Jacksonville. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6182 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2012–0131] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zones; Sellwood Bridge Project, 

Willamette River; Portland, OR 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes the 

establishment of two safety zones to 

remain in effect throughout the duration 

of the construction and renewal of the 

Sellwood Bridge located on the 

Willamette River in Portland, Oregon. 

This action is necessary to ensure the 

safety of vessels transiting in close 

proximity to cranes, barges, and 

temporary structures associated with 

this construction project. During the 

effective period, all vessels will be 

required to remain at the prescribed safe 

distance from the construction area 

while transiting in the vicinity of the 

Sellwood Bridge project; however, the 

establishment of these safety zones does 

not entirely close this section of the 

Willamette River. The section of the 

Willamette River between the safety 

zones will remain open for vessel 

transits, and it will have a minimum 

channel width of 138 feet at all times. 

The two safety zones proposed in this 

rule are located within the same 

geographical points as safety zones 

issued as a temporary final rule effective 

through 11 a.m., July 1, 2012. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 14, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2012–0131 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email ENS Ian McPhillips, 

Waterways Management Division, 

Marine Safety Unit Portland, Coast 

Guard; telephone 503–240–9319, email 

Ian.P.McPhillips@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2012–0131), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a telephone number in the body of 

your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 


pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
15010 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

‘‘USCG–2012–0131’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. Click ‘‘Search’’ then click on the 

balloon shape in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. 

If you submit your comments by mail or 

hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012– 

0131’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 

20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one on or before April 13, 2012 using 

one of the four methods specified under 

ADDRESSES. Please explain why you 

believe a public meeting would be 

beneficial. If we determine that one 

would aid this rulemaking, we will hold 

one at a time and place announced by 

a later notice in the Federal Register. 

Basis and Purpose 

The Sellwood Bridge project will 

replace the existing 86 year old bridge 

that is structurally inadequate and 

functionally obsolete. The project will 

renew the bridge with a new deck arch 

structure compliant with current 

loading and seismic requirements, 

upgrade the interchange at Oregon 

Route 43, and provide substantially 

improved bicycle and pedestrian 

facilities. Construction work will 

continue through January 1, 2015. The 

project includes the construction of two 

temporary structures and two new 

bridge piers which will each require a 

cofferdam. The temporary structures 

will be constructed to facilitate the 

moving of the older bridge. To ensure 

the safety of construction crews on the 

barges, temporary structures, and 

cranes, two safety zones on each side of 

the river are being established to require 

vessels in the vicinity of the 

construction area to remain outside of 

the two designated safety zones. 

Additionally, this will ensure that the 

vessels operating in the vicinity of the 

designated areas will not be in any 

dangerous areas near the temporary 

structures or cranes. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The proposed rule would create two 

safety zones that cover all waters of the 

Willamette River; however, the 

establishment of these safety zones does 

not entirely close this section of the 

Willamette River. The section of the 

Willamette River between the safety 

zones will remain open for vessel 

transits, and it will have a minimum 

channel width of 138 feet at all times. 

The first safety zone on the West river 

bank is encompassed within the 

following four lines: Line one starting at 

45–27′53.5′′ N/122–40′03.5′′ W then 

heading 375 feet offshore to 45–27′53.5′′ 

N/122–39′58.5′′ W then heading up river 

200 feet to 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′58.5′′ 

W then heading 375 feet back to the 

shore at 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–40′04.5′′ W 

then following the shoreline to end at 

45–27′53.5′′ N/122–40′03.5′′ W. The 

second safety zone on the East river 

bank is encompassed within the 

following four lines: Line one starting at 

45–27′53.5′′ N/122–39′50.5′′ W then 

heading 420 feet offshore to 45–27′53.5′′ 

N/122–39′55.0′′ W then heading up river 

200 feet to 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′55.0′′ 

W then heading 420 feet back to the 

shore at 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′47.0′′ W 

then following the shoreline to end at 

45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′47.0′′ W. 

Geographically this rule will cover all 

waters of the Willamette River 100 feet 

upriver and downriver of the existing 

Sellwood Bridge, inward 375 feet from 

the Western side shoreline, and inward 

420 feet from the Eastern side shoreline. 

The section of the Willamette River 

between the safety zones will remain 

open for vessel transits, and it will have 

a minimum width of 138 feet at all 

times. These safety zones will ensure 

the safety of the all vessels and crew 

that are working and transiting in the 

construction areas. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, of 

reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, 

and of promoting flexibility. This rule 

has not been designated a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

the Office of Management and Budget 

has not reviewed this regulation under 

Executive Order 12866. The Coast 

Guard has made this determination 

based on the fact that the safety zones 

created by this rule will not 

significantly affect the maritime public 

because vessels may still transit in the 

vicinity of the safety zones. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

This rule may affect the following 

entities, some of which may be small 

entities: The owners and operators of 

vessels intending to operate in the area 

covered by the safety zones. The safety 

zones will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities because the 

area can still be used to transit through 

this section of the river, which will 


pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules 15011 

maintain a minimum width of 138 feet. 

Other maritime users, such as dragon 

boats, kayaks, and canoes, will be able 

to transit around the safety zones or 

through the open section. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If the rule would affect your small 

business, organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact ENS Ian 

McPhillips, Waterways Management 

Division, Marine Safety Unit Portland, 

Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–9319, 

email Ian.P.McPhillips@uscg.mil. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this proposed rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

state, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian Tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian Tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This rule is 

categorically excluded, under figure 2– 

1, paragraph (34) (g), of the instruction. 

This proposed rule involves the creation 

of two safety zones. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T13–208 to read as 

follows: 


pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
15012 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

§ 165.T13–208 Safety Zones; Sellwood 

Bridge project, Willamette River; Portland, 

OR 

(a) Location. The safety zone on the 

western river bank encompasses all 

waters of the Willamette River within 

the following four lines: Line one 

starting at 45–27′53.5′′ N/122–40′03.5′′ 

W then heading 375 feet offshore to 45– 

27′53.5′′ N/122–39′58.5′′ W then heading 

up river 200 feet to 45–27′49.5′′ N/122– 

39′58.5′′ W then heading 375 feet back 

to the shore at 45–27′49.5′′ N/122– 

40′04.5′′ W then following the shoreline 

to end at 45–27′53.5′′ N/122–40′03.5′′ W. 

The safety zone on the eastern river 

bank is encompassed within the 

following four lines: line one starting at 

45–27′53.5′′ N/122–39′50.5′′ W then 

heading 420 feet offshore to 45–27′53.5′′ 

N/122–39′55.0′′ W then heading up river 

200 feet to 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′55.0′′ 

W then heading 420 feet back to the 

shore at 45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′47.0′′ W 

then following the shoreline to end at 

45–27′49.5′′ N/122–39′47.0′′ W. 

Geographically, this rule will cover all 

waters of the Willamette River 100 feet 

upriver and downriver of the existing 

Sellwood Bridge, inward 375 feet from 

the Western side shoreline, and inward 

420 feet from the Eastern side shoreline. 

The section of the Willamette River 

between the safety zones will remain 

open for vessel transits, and it will have 

a minimum width of 138 feet at all 

times. 

(b) Regulations. In accordance with 

the general regulations in 33 CFR Part 

165, subpart C, no person may enter or 

remain in the safety zones created in 

this section or bring, cause to be 

brought, or allow to remain in the safety 

zones created in this section any 

vehicle, vessel, or object unless 

authorized by the Captain of the Port or 

his designated representative. The 

Captain of the Port may be assisted by 

other federal, state, or local agencies 

with the enforcement of the safety 

zones. 

(c) Effective Period. The Safety zones 

created by this section will be in effect 

from 11 a.m. on July 1, 2012 through 11 

p.m. on January 31, 2015. 

Dated: March 1, 2012. 

B.C. Jones, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Columbia River. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6126 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0001; FRL–9335–9] 

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions 

Filed for Residues of Pesticide 

Chemicals in or on Various 

Commodities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: This document announces the 

Agency’s receipt of several initial filings 

of pesticide petitions requesting the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various commodities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 13, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number and the pesticide petition 

number (PP) of interest as shown in the 

body of this document, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs 

(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001. 

• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public 

Docket (7502P), Environmental 

Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One 

Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. 

Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries 

are only accepted during the Docket 

Facility’s normal hours of operation 

(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays). 

Special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. The 

Docket Facility telephone number is 

(703) 305–5805. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

the docket ID number and the pesticide 

petition number of interest as shown in 

the body of this document. EPA’s policy 

is that all comments received will be 

included in the docket without change 

and may be made available on-line at 

http://www.regulations.gov, including 

any personal information provided, 

unless the comment includes 

information claimed to be Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected through 

regulations.gov or email. The 

regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

regulations.gov, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the comment that is placed in 

the docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the docket index available 

at http://www.regulations.gov. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either in the 

electronic docket at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or, if only 

available in hard copy, at the OPP 

Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S– 

4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 

2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The 

hours of operation of this Docket 

Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The Docket Facility telephone 

number is (703) 305–5805. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A 

contact person, with telephone number 

and email address, is listed at the end 

of each pesticide petition summary. You 

may also reach each contact person by 

mail at Antimicrobials Division (7510P), 

Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention 

Division (7511P), or Registration 

Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. Potentially 


pstrozier on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS