alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF PREVENTION, PESTICIDES

AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES

MEMORANDUM

Date/Time: December 17 , 2014 / 3 :00 p.m.

– 4 :00 p.m.

Subject: Paraquat Dichloride Meeting Minutes . OPP Meets with Technical Registrants of Paraquat Dichloride to D iscuss M itigation Measures and

I mplementation Schedule to A ddress I ncidents A ssociated with P araquat Dichloride Ingestion

.

From: Marianne A. Mannix, Ch emical Review Manager

Re

- evaluation Management and Implementation Branch III

Pesticide Re

- evaluation Division (7508P)

Participants: Patricia Parrott (EPA), Tracy Perry (EPA), Marianne Mannix (EPA), Thurston Morton (EPA), Jihad Alsadek (EPA), Sunil Ratnay ake (EPA), Mindy Ondish (EPA), Nancy Fitz (EPA), Jonathan Becker (EPA), Elizabeth Evans (EPA), Ginger Moser (EPA), Monty Dixon (Syngenta), John Abbott (Syngenta), Jerry Wells (Syngenta), Paul Hoekstra (Syngenta), Larry Miller (Sinon), Cheryl Wagner (Willow ood), Kelly Powell (Celcius), Iain Weatherston (US Raymat), Jan Stechmann (Helm Agro), Robert Hawk (Source Dynamics), Stanley Bernard (Drexel), Victoria Godfrey (PRMA), Dana Bruce (PMRA), Michel Oriel (CDPR), Nino Yang a (CDPR)

Meeting Minutes:

The Envir onmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) met with the technical registrants of paraquat dichloride to discuss mitigation options and

their implementation to address accidental ingestion incidents associated with the herbicide p araquat dichloride

. Technical registrants of paraquat dichloride include : Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Celcius Property B.V., Amsterdam (NL), Helm Agro US Inc., Sharda Cropchem Limited, Sinon Corporation, Source Dynamics, US Raymat, and Willowood Paraquat LLC. Monty Dixon and John Abbott of Syngenta attended the meeting in person, and representatives for the other technical registrants participated in the meeting through a conference line.

During the meeting, EPA and the technical registrants agreed upon a set of mitigation measures intended to address accidental ingestion incidents associated with paraquat. The agreed upon mitigation measures include: label amendments to highlight ingestion risk and toxicity, supplemental warning materials, packaging cha nges for non

- bulk containers, and the development of stewardship/training materials for certified applicators. In themeeting, it was proposed that the aforementioned mitigation measures would be implemented within one year or at the next production cycle. The EPA agreed to review the agreed upon mitigation measures and provide feedback to the registrants in preparation for the development and implementation of the mitigation measures.
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony J. Merante, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Creative Bakeries, Inc;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and I have:
         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in  this  annual  report  our   conclusions   about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were  significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal  controls  subsequent  to the  date  of  our  most  recent  evaluation,
including any  corrective  actions with regard to significant  deficiencies  and
material weaknesses.


Date: March 28, 2005

/s/ Anthony J. Merante
----------------------
Anthony J. Merante
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

                                       45
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2023 

To modify and extend the temporary duty suspension on certain giardiniera 

prepared or preserved otherwise than by vinegar. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To modify and extend the temporary duty suspension on 

certain giardiniera prepared or preserved otherwise than 

by vinegar. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GIARDINIERA PREPARED OR PRE4 SERVED OTHERWISE THAN BY VINEGAR. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.30 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 giardiniera prepared or preserved otherwise than by vin8 egar) is amended— 

9 (1) in the article description, by striking 

10 ‘‘2005.99.55’’ and inserting ‘‘2005.99.97’’; and 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2023 IS

1 (2) in the effective period column, by striking 

2 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Jerry BALLARD v. STATE of Mississippi.

No. 91-KA-0324.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

Dec. 23, 1993.

J. Tayloe Simmons, Jr. and Ross R. Barnett, Jr., Barnett Law Firm, Thomas J. Lowe, Jr., Jackson, for appellant.

Michael C. Moore, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.

Appeal No. 10959 from Judgment dated Jan. 28, 1991, Joe N. Pigott, Ruling Judge, Lincoln County Circuit Court.

Before DAN M. LEE, P.J., and BANKS, and JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr., JJ.

Affirmed.
#### Charles A. SPENCER, Appellant, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-86-456.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

April 30, 1987.

*995Patti Palmer, Appellate Public Defender, Norman, for appellant.

Michael C. Turpén, Atty. Gen., Tomilou Gentry Liddell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sandra D. Howard, Legal Intern, Oklahoma City, for Appellee.

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

The appellant, Charles A. Spencer, was tried and convicted in the District Court of Kiowa County of the crime of Unlawful Possession of Marijuana with Intent to Distribute, After Former Conviction of a Felony in Case No. CRF-85-30 and was sentenced to ten (10) years imprisonment, and he appeals.

In his single assignment of error appellant contends that the trial court committed fundamental error in its instruction given during the second stage of trial in that it instructed upon allowable punishment under the general habitual offender act, 21 O.S.1981, § 51, rather than under the specific statute applicable to drug related offenses, 63 O.S.1981, § 2-401. We agree.

Since the predicate felony used to enhance appellant’s punishment was for Unlawful Delivery of Marjuana, the jury should have been instructed that they could sentence appellant to a term of imprisonment from four (4) years to twenty (20) years and a fine of no more than $10,000. *See*63 O.S.1981, § 2-401(B)(2), (C); *see also Faubion v. State,*569 P.2d 1022 (Okl.Cr.1977). However, the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury, under 21 O.S. 1981, § 51, that the minimum sentence it could impose was ten (10) years with no maximum sentence stated. The jury sentenced appellant to the minimum sentence of ten (10) years, but since the minimum sentence under the proper statute was four (4) years, we are of the opinion that appellant’s sentence should be modified to four (4) years imprisonment.

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED, but the sentence is MODIFIED to four (4) years imprisonment.

BRETT, P.J., and PARKS, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2
  , Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (1)
    
    the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David M. GandossiDavid M. GandossiChief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

REPUBLIC WATER COMPANY OF 

TEXAS, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

MIDDLE PECOS GROUNDWATER 

CONSERVATION DISTRICT,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00001-CV

Appeal from the

112th District Court

of Pecos County, Texas

(TC# P-11956-112-CV)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Republic Water Company of Texas, LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss its

appeal because the parties have agreed to settle their dispute. See TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1. We grant 

the motion and dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal are taxed against Appellant. See 

TEX.R.APP.P. 42.1(d)(“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant.”).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

August 4, 2017

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Guine, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered March 1, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and determined to have been established.

The defendant argues that this court should vacate his judgment of conviction, grant his pretrial motion to suppress evidence on the basis that there was no probable cause for his arrest, and dismiss the indictment. In the alternative, he contends that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered because of the court’s improper discharge of a sworn juror.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, probable cause existed for his arrest. An experienced police officer initially observed the defendant in a location known for drug trafficking, holding a clear plastic bag of what appeared to be crack-cocaine. Upon his arrest a short time later, twelve bags of crack-cocaine were removed from his pocket. In an analogous case, this court affirmed the trial court’s denial of suppression of narcotics recovered from a defendant, reasoning that "[t]he officer’s observation of contraband in plain view on a public street corner provided probable cause for seizure of the bag and the defendant’s arrest” *(People v Smith,*143 AD2d 109, 110; *see, People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594).

We conclude, however, that there must be a new trial because of the court’s improper discharge of a sworn juror. During the trial, a sworn juror informed the court that he wanted to be absent from the proceedings the next morning because of a crisis at his place of employment. The court proceeded to discharge the juror and replace him with an alternate without conducting the "reasonably thorough inquiry and recitation on the record of the facts and reasons for invoking the statutory authorization [CPL 270.35] of discharging and replacing a juror based on continued unavailability” *850
      *(People v Page,*72 NY2d 69, 73; *see, People v Thomas,*147 AD2d 598, 599). In fact, the court made nó inquiry of the juror at all, nor did it heed defense counsel’s suggestion to do so. Since such error is not subject to harmless error analysis *(see, People v Anderson,*70 NY2d 729, 730-731; *People v John,*163 AD2d 534; *People v Marchese,*158 AD2d 473, 475), we agree with the defendant, and with the prosecutor’s acknowledgement, that the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered. Brown, J. P., Kunzeman, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
•

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

In the matter of

The State ofConnecticut and

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC

)

)

)

)

)

Trading Agreement and Order No. 8241

Modification No.3

Whereas, the Commissioner of Environmental Protection ("Commissioner") and PSEG Power

Connecticut LLC ("Respondent") having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8241 and all previous modification thereto, do now, by mutual

agreement, further modify said modified Trading Agreement and Order as follows:

I. All references to May I, 2009 with respect to the authorization to use emissions

reduction credit trading and/or emission reduction credits and NOx allowances to

comply with the emissions limits of Subsections 22a-174-22(d)(l) through 22a-174-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations ofConnecticut State Agencies ("Regulations") are

hereby replaced with May I, 20 IO.

2. Any references to October 1st with respect to the date by which the Respondent shall

estimate and acquire Discrete Emission Reduction Credits ("DERCs") and/or

allowances for the non-ozone season shall now include October 1,2009.

3. Any references to May 31,2007 and May 31,2008 with respect to calculation and

retirement of non-ozone season DERCs shall now include May 31, 2009 and May 31,

2010.

4. All references to September I, 2008 with respect to the submission of Future

Compliance Reports are hereby replaced with September I, 2009.

5. No later than May I, 20 I0, with respect to the emission units identified in Trading

Agreement and Order No. 8241 and/or its subsequent modifications, the Respondent

shall comply with the requirements of Sections 22a-174-22(d)(l) and 22a-I74-

22(d)(2)(A) ofthe Regulations.

6. All other terms and conditions of Trading Agreement and Order No. 8241, as modified,

shall remain in effect.

( Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Street • Hartford. CT 06106 - 5127

http://....,"'w.ct.gov/dcp

All Eql/al Opporllmiry Employer
I •

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC 2 Trading Agreement

and Order No. 8241

Modification No.3

The Respondent hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

P~EG pow~.tLLC__-=~

SIgnature: ~::~.illlS:2:~;;j:QU~;;::;;A )

Name: /(Aftl A. W...,-I-Ul:;§ - •

Title: PI"""7- /1""'M Ii~

Date: At"'-/ 'I, ~oo'l

Issued as a modification of a Trading Agreement and Order.

G8.l1 VRos(l

Dir~tor V

Engineering and Enforcement Division

Bureau of Air Management

Date

.. . '
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Bedminster National Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul Patrizio, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fully complies with the

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bedminster National Corp. |   |

   
| Dated: August 14, 2006 |
|------------------------|

 

**BEDMINSTER NATIONAL CORP.**

 
| By: | */s/ Paul Patrizio*Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2288 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on p-Amino Benzamide. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on p-Amino 

Benzamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. P-AMINO BENZAMIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.13 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 p-Amino Benzamide) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective column period and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2288 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EPA FORM 6100-3 (DBE Subcontractor Performance Form) 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Performance Form 

This form is intended to capture the DBE1 subcontractor’s2 description of work to be performed and the price of 

the work submitted to the prime contractor. An EPA Financial Assistance Agreement Recipient must require its 

prime contractor to have its DBE subcontractors complete this form and include all completed forms in the prime 

contractors bid or proposal package. 

Subcontractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposal No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address

Telephone No. Email Address

Prime Contractor Name Issuing/Funding Entity:

Contract Item Number Description of Work Submitted to the Prime Contractor 

Involving Construction, Services , Equipment or Supplies

Price of Work 

Submitted to the 

Prime Contractor

DBE Certified By: ____ DOT ____ SBA 

____ Other: _________________________________________ 

Meets/ exceeds EPA certification standards? 

____ YES ____ NO ____ Unknown

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as 

described in 40 CFR 33.204-33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as 

described in 40 CFR 33.202. 

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company, firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agreement with a contractor to provide services 

pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance. 

OMB Control No: 2090-0030 

Approval Expires: XX/XX/XX
EPA FORM 6100-3 (DBE Subcontractor Performance Form) 

OMB Control No: 

Approved: 

Approval Expires: 

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program 

DBE Subcontractor Performance Form 

I certify under penalty of perjury that the forgoing statements are true and correct. Signing this form does not 

signify a commitment to utilize the subcontractors above. I am aware of that in the event of a replacement of a 

subcontractor, I will adhere to the replacement requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 33 Section 33.302 (c). 

Prime Contractor Signature Print Name

Title Date

Subcontractor Signature Print Name

Title Date

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per 

response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, 

and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection 

techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send 

the completed form to this address.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2179 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric acid, tris (2- 

ethylhexyl)ester. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Phosphoric 

acid, tris (2-ethylhexyl)ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHOSPHORIC ACID, TRIS (2- 

4 ETHYLHEXYL)ESTER. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.62 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Phosphoric acid, tris (2-ethylhexyl)ester) is amended by 

8 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2179 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2014339DE.01001401.xml

| 26.11.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 339/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 339/14

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1901/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Dezember 2006 über Kinderarzneimittel und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 1768/92, der Richtlinien 2001/20/EG und 2001/83/EG sowie der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 726/2004

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 378 vom 27. Dezember 2006
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L 378 vom 27. Dezember 2006

Auf Seite 3, im Erwägungsgrund 21, letzter Satz am Ende:

anstatt:

„... sollte für das zentrale Genehmigungsverfahren der Gemeinschaft nach den Artikeln 5 bis 15 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 726/2004.“

muss es heißen:

„... sollte für das zentrale Genehmigungsverfahren der Gemeinschaft nach den Artikeln 5 bis 15 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 726/2004 in Betracht kommen.“

---