alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of World
Airways, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr., Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the
Act), that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ GILBERTO M. DUARTE, JR.
| |                            
| | Gilberto M. Duarte, Jr.    
| | Chief Financial Officer    

Date: 3/26/04
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Coates International, Ltd., on Amendment
No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), I, George J. Coates, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Coates International,
Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coates
      International, Ltd as of and for the period covered by the Report.

Dated:  January 27, 2006               COATES INTERNATIONAL, LTD.

                                       By: /s/ George J. Coates
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                                           and Principal Accounting Officer

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, David A. Husband, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Vodavi Technology,Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
   a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
   b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
   c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and;
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize,and report financial information ; and
   b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: March 5, 2004     /s/ David A. Husband   David A. Husband Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

__________________________________________ 

 ) 

 SIERRA CLUB, ) Civil Action No. 

 ) 1:12-cv-00705-CKK 

Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) 

 ) 

ROBERT PERCIASEPE, Acting Administrator, ) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. ) 

 ) 

Defendant. ) 

__________________________________________) 

STIPULATION 

On December 19, 2012, the Court entered a Consent Decree (ECF 13) resolving the 

claims asserted in this matter by Plaintiff Sierra Club against Defendant Robert Perciasepe, in his 

official capacity as Acting Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency 

(“EPA”). Paragraph 6 of the Consent Decree provides that the deadlines in Paragraphs 2 and 3 

therein may be extended by written stipulation executed by counsel for Sierra Club and EPA 

with notice to the Court. 

Pursuant to Paragraph 6, Sierra Club and EPA stipulate that the deadline in Paragraph 2 

of the Consent Decree shall be extended from May 31, 2013, to August 30, 2013. 

 SO AGREED: 

FOR PLAINTIFF SIERRA CLUB /s/ Robert Ukeiley 

 Law Office of Robert Ukeiley 

507 Center Street 

Berea, KY 40403 

Phone: (859) 986-5402 

Fax: (866) 618-1017 

rukeiley@igc.org 

DATED: 5/15/13 

Case 1:12-cv-00705-CKK Document 17 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 2
2 

FOR DEFENDANT EPA IGNACIA S. MORENO 

 Assistant Attorney General 

 Environment & Natural Resources Division 

/s/ Eileen T. McDonough 

Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Justice 

Environment & Natural Resources Division 

Environmental Defense Section 

P.O. Box 7611 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

Phone: (202) 514-3126 

Fax: (202) 514-8865 

eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov 

DATED: 5/20/13 

Of Counsel for Defendant: 

KAYTRUE TING 

Office of the General Counsel 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Bldg., MC 2344A 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Phone: (202) 564-6380 

Fax: (202) 564-5603 

ting.kaytrue@epa.gov

RICHARD H. BARTLEY 

Office of Regional Counsel, Region 6 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1445 Ross Avenue 

Suite 1200 

Mail Code: 6RC 

Dallas, TX 75202-2733 

Phone: (214) 665-8046 

Fax: (214) 665-2172 

bartley.richard@epa.gov 

Case 1:12-cv-00705-CKK Document 17 Filed 05/20/13 Page 2 of 2
**Technical Meeting to Discuss the U.S. EPA Notice of Data Availability Concerning Renewable Fuels**  **Produced from Palm Oil Meeting Date: Thursday, March 22**  **Building: RRB, OITA Fishbowl, RRB 3**  **rd Floor**  **Time: 3:45 (arrive)**
**- 6:00 PM**  **1. List of Delegation from**  **Malaysia for Technical Meeting with EPA Name**  **Designation** 1. Dr. Choo Yuen May Director General of Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) 2. Dr. Lim Weng Soon Director of processing and Engineering, MPOB 3. Dr. Phua Chiew Wei Scientist 4. Hj Wahid bin Omar Scientist 5. Dr. Tan Yew Ai Scientist

**2. List of Delegation from Indonesia for Technical Meeting with EPA** 

6. Dr. Rosediana Suharto Executive Chairperson of Indonesia Palm Oil Commission 7
. Dr. Fahmuddin Agus 8. Mr. Tony Liwang R&D Director PT SMART 9. Mr. Donald Siahaan Indonesian Palm Oil Research Institute 10. Dr. Mohamad Fadhil Hasan Executive Director of Indonesian Palm Oil Association
**3. Representatives from Other Stakeholder Organizations** 11. Neville Fernandes President, Neste Oil US., Inc. 12. Steven Gust Neste Oil 13. Kurt Blase Partner, Holland & Knight, LLP 14. John Cummings Vice President, Wilmar Oleo North America, LLC 15. Jeremy Goon Kin Wai Wilmar 16. Mohd Salleh Kassim American Palm Oil Council

**4 . Representatives from U.S.**  **EPA**Karl Simon, Director, Transportation and Climate Division

Benjamin Hengst, Assistant Director, Transportation and Climate Division Sharyn Lie, Director, Climate and Economic Modeling Center Aaron Levy, Transportation and Climate Division Luis Troche, Office of International and Tribal Affairs
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Scientific, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan I. Edrick, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:
January 24, 2003

|By: |  | /s/ Alan I. EdrickAlan I. Edrick
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Frank Lacatena, Doing Business as Heights Meat Market. Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, Petitioner.

Mahoney, P. J.

Application pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a) to vacate an ex parte order of the Supreme Court (McDermott, J.), entered December 4, 1990 in Albany County, which denied petitioner’s request for an inspection warrant for the premises of Frank Lacatena, doing business as Heights Meat Market.

In March 1989, petitioner’s food inspector attempted an inspection of Heights Meat Market (hereinafter Heights), a retail operation located in the City of Newburgh, Orange County. The inspection was discontinued after employees of Heights allegedly made threatening comments to the inspec*953tor. Another attempt at inspection was made in May 1990, at which time the same food inspector was allegedly assaulted by Heights employees. Petitioner thereafter applied, ex parte, for a warrant to inspect Heights. Supreme Court denied petitioner’s request, leading to this application pursuant to CPLR 5704 (a).

Supreme Court denied petitioner’s request for lack of probable cause on the ground that it failed to set forth facts to establish that Heights was in violation of certain provisions set forth in the Agriculture and Markets Law. We note here that "the strict standards attending the issuance of a warrant in criminal cases are not applicable to the issuance of a warrant authorizing an administrative inspection” *(Sokolov v Village of Freeport,*52 NY2d 341, 348; *see, Camara v Municipal Ct.,*387 US 523, 545). For an administrative inspection warrant to issue for health or safety inspections, all that is required is a showing of probable cause to conduct an inspection, not probable cause to believe that either a crime or regulatory violation has occurred *(see, Matter of R & L Distribs. v Wickham,*36 AD2d 884, 885, *appeal dismissed*29 NY2d 875; *State of New York v Iranian Caviar & Sturgeon Corp.,*102 Misc 2d 1037, 1042; *see also, Marshall v Barlow’s, Inc.,*436 US 307, 320). A finding of probable cause to inspect includes a showing that reasonable legislative and administrative standards exist for the inspection of the particular premises at issue *(see, See v City of Seattle,*387 US 541).

Here, petitioner is statutorily authorized to conduct inspections *(see,*Agriculture and Markets Law § 16 [1], [30]; § 20; art 17) as part of its regulatory function to ensure, *inter alia,*the sanitation of retail food stores *(see,*1 NYCRR part 271). In our view, given the important governmental interest in the public health and the antagonistic reception of petitioner’s inspector by Heights’ employees, probable cause existed to justify the issuance of the inspection warrant. Accordingly, Supreme Court’s order should be vacated and the warrant issued.

Application granted, without costs, order vacated and warrant issued. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Weiss, Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Regina F. Weller, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report of Z Yachts., Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 21, 2007/s/ Regina F. WellerTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


18
U.S. C. Section 1350


as
adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by
the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August
      10, 2009
            By:
            /s/Frank
      C. SpencerName:
      Frank C. SpencerTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer




The
undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Cogdell Spencer Inc (the “Company”),
hereby certifies to the best of his knowledge on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 (the “Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August
      10, 2009
            By:
            /s/Charles
      M. HandyName:
      Charles M. HandyTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer




Pursuant
to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-47551, dated March 21,
2003, this certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended or incorporated be reference in any registration statement of the
Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 593. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative 

means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2004-09R1

Issue Date 

4 July 2005 

Number: CF-2004-09R1 

Subject: Power Turbine RPM Steady-State Operation Avoidance

Effective: 28 July 2005 

Revision: Supersedes Airworthiness Directive (AD) CF-2004-09, issued 22 April 2004. 

Applicability: Bell Helicopter Textron Canada (BHTC) Model 407 helicopters, serial numbers 53000 to 

53644. 

Compliance: As indicated. 

Background: Transport Canada has been advised of multiple reports of failure of the third stage 

turbine wheel used in both the Rolls-Royce 250-C30S and 250-C47B engines. There 

have been six in-flight failures of which three have occurred to the 250-C47B engine 

utilized by BHTC for the Model 407. Rolls-Royce has determined that detrimental 

vibrations can occur within a particular range of turbine speeds as a potential contributing 

factor to these failures. BHTC revised their rotorcraft flight manual and provided a decal 

to inform pilots to avoid steady-state operations at these engine turbine speeds. 

This revision introduces a slight increase to the steady-state operation avoidance 

limitations. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Part A: Rotorcraft Flight Manual Amendment 

Within 10 calendar days after the effective date of this directive, insert the flight manual 

supplement BHT-407-FM-1, Revision 3, or later approved revision, into the rotorcraft 

flight manual and advise the pilot of this change. 

Part B: Installation of Decal 

In conjunction with Part A above, install the decal as per Alert Service Bulletin 407-05-67, 

dated 8 June 2005, or later revision approved by Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, 

Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For Minister of Transport 

A. Wan 

Acting Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Mr. Bill Taylor, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4366, facsimile 

613 996-9178 or e-mail taylorw@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2326 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain synthetic filament 

yarns. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KIRK) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

synthetic filament yarns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SYNTHETIC FILAMENT YARNS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain synthetic filament yarns) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2326 IS

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS