alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA



### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

JUAN CARLOS CASTANON, JR.

,

Appellant

,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee.

No. 2D 20 2 3

- 1030

August 30

, 202 4

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna M. Padar

, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins,

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee

, and Helene S. Parnes

, Senior Assistant Attorney General for Appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and CASANUEVA and MORRIS , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Order entered January 30, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00739-CR

No. 05-15-00793-CR

MIGUEL GONZALES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-59527-J, F15-59528-J

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s third motion to extend time to file his brief.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has 

not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 73
          - [Docket No. FDA-2011-C-0878]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of petition.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that Mars, Inc., has filed a petition proposing that the color additive regulations be amended to provide for the safe use of spirulina blue, an extract made from the biomass of                         *Anthrospira platensis*                         (spirulina), to color candy and chewing gum.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Felicia M. Ellison, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-265), Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740-3835, (240) 402-1264.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (section 721(d)(1) (21 U.S.C. 379e(d)(1))), notice is given that a color additive petition (CAP 2C0293) has been filed by Mars, Inc., c/o Keller and Heckman LLP, 1001 G St. NW., suite 500 West, Washington, DC 20001. The petition proposes to amend the color additive regulations in part 73 (21 CFR part 73)                     *Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification*                     to provide for the safe use of spirulina blue, an extract made from the biomass of                     *Anthrospira platensis*                     (spirulina), as a color additive in candy and chewing gum.                

The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.32(k) that this action is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.

Dated: January 6, 2012.

Dennis M. Keefe,

Director, Office of Food Additive Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

[FR Doc. 2012-599 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
----

----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      6, 2010 | /s/      David J. Bryant                                  |
|------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|             | David      J. Bryant                                      |
|             | Chief      Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer |
|             |                                                      |

----

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of SemiLEDs Corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010  (the “Report”), I, David Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                 the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: | January   21, 2011 |   | /s/   David Young                |
|--------|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |               |   | Name:   David Young              |
|   |               |   | Title:   Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Carrie Hartwick, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of The
Hartcourt Companies, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                               /s/ Carrie Hartwick
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Name:  Carrie Hartwick
                                        Date:  April 15, 2005


                                 Exhibit 32.1-1
# L_2006031EN.01000301.xml

| 3.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 184/2006

of 2 February 2006

amending the rates of refunds applicable to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/2001 of 19 June 2001 on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector (1), and in particular Article 27(5)(a) and (15) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The rates of the refunds applicable from 20 January 2006 to the products listed in the Annex, exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty, were fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 (2).

| (2) | It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It follows from applying the rules and criteria contained in Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 to the information at present available to the Commission that the export refunds at present applicable should be altered as shown in the Annex hereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The rates of refund fixed by Regulation (EC) No 90/2006 are hereby altered as shown in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 3 February 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 February 2006.

For the Commission

Günter VERHEUGEN

Vice-President

---

(1)  
  OJ L 178, 30.6.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 39/2004 (OJ L 6, 10.1.2004, p. 16).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 15, 20.1.2006, p. 32.

2

---

ANNEX

Rates of refunds applicable from 3 February 2006 to certain products from the sugar sector exported in the form of goods not covered by Annex I to the Treaty (1)

| CN code | Description | Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| In case of advance fixing of refunds | Other |
| 1701 99 10 | White sugar | 28,29 | 28,29 |

CN code

Description

Rate of refund in EUR/100 kg

In case of advance fixing of refunds

Other

1701 99 10

White sugar

28,29

28,29

---

(1)  The rates set out in this Annex are not applicable to exports to Bulgaria, with effect from 1 October 2004, to Romania with effect from 1 December 2005, and to the goods listed in Tables I and II to Protocol No 2 to the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972 exported to the Swiss Confederation or to the Principality of Liechtenstein with effect from 1 February 2005.

---
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant for Non-Employee Directors


 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION GRANT 
 FOR NON-EMPLOYEES DIRECTORS 






 Non-Employee 
 Director 
 CHENIERE ENERGY, INC. 
 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION GRANT 
 Optionee:
                                        

  

	I.	Grant Of Stock Option. As of the grant date (identified below), Cheniere Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby grants a non-qualified stock option (the
“option”) to the undersigned Optionee (the “Optionee”) to purchase the number of shares of the Company’s common stock, $.003 par value per share, identified below (the “common stock”), subject to the terms and
conditions of this grant (the “grant”) and the Company’s 2003 stock incentive plan, as amended (the “plan”), which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. The common stock, when issued to Optionee upon the
exercise of the option, shall be fully paid and nonassessable. The option is not an “incentive stock option” as defined in section 422 of the internal revenue code. 

  

	II.	Definitions and Other Terms. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the plan unless otherwise provided herein. The following
capitalized terms shall have those meanings set forth opposite them: 

  

	 	B.	Optionee:
                                        .


  

	 	C.	Grant Date:                          ,
20    . 

  

	 	D.	Shares subject to Options:              shares of the Company’s Common Stock.


  

	 	E.	Option Price: $             per share. 

  

	 	F.	Option Period:                     , 2005 through
                    , 2010 (until 12:00 p.m. central). 

  

	 	G.	Exercise: The Options are fully vested upon the Grant Date and may be exercised immediately. 

  

	III.	Option Period. The option period shall begin on the grant date and terminate on the      day of
                    , 20     (the “option expiration date”). 

  

	IV.	Withholding of Taxes. Any issuance of common stock pursuant to the exercise of an option shall not be made until appropriate arrangements satisfactory to the Company
have been made for payment of any tax amounts (federal, state, local or other) that may be required to be withheld or paid by the Company with respect thereto. 







 Non-Employee 
 Director 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Non-Qualified Stock Option Grant is executed this
     day of                     , 20    . 
  

			
	CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  

	
	717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3100
	Houston, Texas 77002-4102


 Accepted and agreed this      day of
                    , 20    . 
  

			
	“OPTIONEE”
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	  

	Title:	 	  

		
	Address:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 27, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00812

- CR

Gary ALVAREZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4637B

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has

NO right of appeal.” We therefore ORDER the trial court clerk to file, within ten days of the date

of this order , a clerk’s record containing the following documents:

1. All pre

- trial motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

2. all documents relating to the defendant’s plea bargain, including the

court’s admonishments, the defendant’s waiver and consent to stipulation

of te stimony, and any other stipulations;

3. the judgment;

4. all post

-

judgment motions and the orders on those motions, if any;

5. the notice(s) of appeal;

6. the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal;

7. the criminal docket sheet ; a nd

8

. the bill of costs.All other appellate deadlines are suspended pending further order of this court. The clerk of this

court is ORDERED to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court clerk,

and the court reporter(s) respons ible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal.

________ _________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of December, 2016

.

__ _________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133579 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133579 

 COA: 264825 

Kent CC: 04-004787-FC 

PAUL ALLEN BERNARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

________________________ No s . 07 - 19 - 00333 - CR 07 - 19 - 00334 - CR 07 - 19 - 00335 - CR

________________________ NATHAN GENE COLLINS , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 181st District Court Potter C ounty, Texas Trial Court No s . 74,154 - B - CR, 76,517 - B - CR, 77,804 - B - CR ; Honorable Dan L. Schaap , Presiding January 6 , 2020 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and P

ARKER and DOSS , JJ. Pursuant to plea bargain agreement s , Appellant, Nathan Gene Collins , was convicted of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, 1 possession of a controlled substance

1 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 31.07 (West 2016 ) (state jail felony)
. Appellant’s range of punishment was enhanced by two prior state jail felony convictions. Id . at § 12.425 ( a ) (West 2019 ).2

in an amount less than one gram, 2 and bail jumping and failure to appear. 3 He was sentenced to five years confinement for each offense, with the sentences to run concurrently. The trial court ’s certification s of Appellant’s right of appeal reflect that these are plea - bargained case s wit h no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right of appeal. N otwithstanding the certifications , Appellant filed a notice of appeal challenging h is conviction s . We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a c ertification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” By letter of October 28, 2019 , we notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification s and invited him to file amended certification s providing a right of appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal s by November 7 . We subsequently granted Appellant an extension to December 16 to file a response
. Appellant has not respond ed to the court’s letter to date . Accordingly , we dismiss the appeal s based on the trial court’s certification s . T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).
Per Curiam Do not publish.

2 T EX . H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN . § 481.115(b) (West 2017 ) (state jail felony). Appellant’s range of punishment was enhanced by tw o prior state jail felony convictions
. T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12.425( a ).

3 T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 38.10(f) (West 2016 ) (third degree felony) . Appellant ’ s range of punishment was enhanced by a prior final felony conviction. T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 12. 42(a) (West 2019 ).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MIDWEST EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF AND
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          27,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                       207
<INVENTORY>                                      3,122
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,569
<PP&E>                                         130,792
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,363
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            64
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,135
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,746
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  270,387
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,750
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,750
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.26
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.05(a)

                              TANNER'S CORPORATION



March 16, 1999


Mr. William Gallagher
1250 NE Loop 410, Suite 335
San Antonio, Texas  78209

Dear Bill:

As we  discussed,  I offer the following to resolve our dispute over the payment
of your severance.

Upon settlement of the Broadway matter,  the Company will forward to you the net
proceeds. This should be approximately $30,000 and this should satisfy the terms
of the $50,000 note. Upon settlement of the South Padre matter, the Company will
forward  the  amount  that has been  garnished.  This  should  be  approximately
$36,000.  This letter should serve as  authorization  for Tim Tuggey to transfer
such funds, once received, to you.

Additionally, the Company will pay you $5,000 per week until the earlier of such
time that the Tezel  property is sold and the  proceeds are received or the next
round of financing is closed.  At that time, the balance of the amount owed will
be paid.  Each $5,000 payment shall be due on Monday of each week with the first
payment being due on Tuesday, March 16, 1999 and the second payment being due on
Monday, March 22, 1999. Payments will be made weekly from then on.

Sincerely,


/s/ Tim Robinson
Tim Robinson
Vice President/CFO


Acknowledged and agreed to this 16th day of March 1999.

By: /s/ William Gallagher