alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1675
<ALLOWANCES>                                        00
<INVENTORY>                                        756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2440
<PP&E>                                           11283
<DEPRECIATION>                                    6715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    7012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5749
<BONDS>                                           7000
<COMMON>                                            40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             8500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      7012
<SALES>                                           6907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6907
<CGS>                                             4538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 843
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (699)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (674)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1269)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)


</TABLE>
REGULUS
 Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1123
 Pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of the Regulus activities during the year
ended December 31, 2010 (the Reporting Period) and of its performance under the servicing
agreement between Regulus and American Express (the Servicing Agreement) has been made under
the undersigned officers supervision. To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such
review, Regulus has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
 /s/ Kathleen HamburgerKathleen HamburgerChief Executive Officer and PresidentFebruary 11, 2011
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Utilicraft  Aerospace
Industries,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Dupont, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


    Date: August 10, 2007                                /s/ John Dupont
                                                         ---------------
                                                         John Dupont
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consent ofIndependent Auditors**

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the following Registration Statements and related Prospectuses of our reportdated January 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statementsof Pacific Northwest Bancorp and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities andExchange Commission.

 
| **Form** |   | **Registration  Statement No.** |   | **Purpose**                                                                                                                  |
|----------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| S-8      |   | 33-99742                        |   | InterWest  Bank 1984 Stock Option Plan                                                                                       |
| S-8      |   | 33-99742                        |   | InterWest  Bancorp, Inc. 1993 Incentive & Non-Incentive Stock Option Plans for  Outside Directors                        |
| S-8      |   | 333-13191                       |   | Central  Bancorporation 1992 Employee Stock Option Plan & Central Bancorporation  Director Stock Option Plan             |
| S-8      |   | 333-24525                       |   | InterWest  Bancorp, Inc. 1996 Outside Directors Stock Options-For-Fees Plan                                                  |
| S-8      |   | 333-50685                       |   | First  National Bank Of Port Orchard 1990 Employee & Director Stock Option Plan                                          |
| S-8      |   | 333-57679                       |   | Pacific  Northwest Bank 1988 Stock Option Plan & Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. Amended And  Restated Incentive Stock Option Plan |
| S-8      |   | 333-65839                       |   | Kittitas  Valley Bancorp 1996 Director Stock Option Plan & Kittitas Valley Bancorp  Employee Stock Option Plan           |
| S-8      |   | 333-76014                       |   | Amended and  Restated Pacific Northwest Bancorp Salary Deferral 401(k) Plan                                                  |

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Seattle, Washington

March 25, 2002

 

 

 

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 2238

TANYITAKU CLOVIS NWANNA, a/k/a Clovis Tanyi Taku; MARCELENE FORTON EBANGHA , Petitioner s ,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : May 4, 2017 Decided: June 14, 2017

Before TRAXLER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition dismissed in part and denied in part by un published per curiam opinion

.
William Payne, PAYNE & ASSOCIATES, Washington, D.C. , for Petitioner s
. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Kohsei Ugumori, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jesse Lloyd Busen , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNIT ED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tanyitaku Clovis Nwanna and Marcelene Forton Ebangha, natives and citizens of
Cameroon , petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying their motion to reopen. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. Before this court, the Petitioners seek to challenge the im migration judge’s adverse credibility determination and the agency’s underlying denial of their applications for relief. Only the Board’s denial of the Petitioners’ motion to reopen is properly before us , however, as the Petitioners failed to timely petit ion this c ourt for review of the Board’s decision of May 20, 2016. The Petitioners had 30 days from the date of this initial decision to timely file a petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2012). This time period is “jurisdictional in nature a nd must be construed with strict fidelity to [its] terms.” Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). The filing of a motion to reopen with the Board does not
toll the 30

- day period for seeking review of an underlying decision. Id. at 394. Accordingly, we now limit our review to the propriety of the Board’s denial of the Petitioners’ motion to reopen, and we dismiss the petition for review to the extent the Petitioners challenge the earlier decision

. Turning to the Board’s denial of the Petitioners’ motion to reopen, we have reviewed the Petitioners’ claims in conjunction with the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003. 2(a) (2016); Mosere v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 397, 400 (4th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Nwanna (B.I.A.3 Sept. 27, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and l egal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART
**Exhibit 21.1**

**DYNAMIC HEALTH PRODUCTS, INC**. -****

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

Pharma Labs Rx, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Herbal Health Products, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Dynamic Life Products, Inc., a Florida corporation 

Online Meds Rx, Inc., a Florida corporation, and its subsidiary, Dynamic Financial Consultants, LLC, a Florida limited liability company 

Bryan Capital Limited Partnership, a Nevada limited partnership 

Pharma Labs Rx, Inc., aNevada corporation 

Bob O’Leary Health Food Distributor Co., Inc., a Commonwealth of Pennsylvania corporation

Dynamic Marketing I, Inc., a Florida corporation 

DYHP Acquisitions, Inc., a Florida corporation
EXHIBIT 12.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Bovard, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Amended Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Amended Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,

summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 19, 2006



John Bovard

By: /s/ "John Bovard"

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





102
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

___________________ No. 96-50845 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ISMAEL CARRILLO-MARQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-96-CR-400-ALL
- - - - - - - - - - September 10, 1997 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ismael Carrillo-Marquez (“Marquez”) appeals his jury conviction for importation of cocaine and for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. See United States v. Ivey , 949 F.2d 759, 766 (5th Cir.No. 96-50845 -2- 1991). The district court did not plainly err by failing to give a separate jury instruction on the definition of “knowingly.” See United States v. Sanchez-Sotelo , 8 F.3d 202, 212 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
# L_2006298DE.01003201.xml

| 27.10.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 298/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2006

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 298/32

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 967/2006 der Kommission vom 29. Juni 2006 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 318/2006 des Rates hinsichtlich der Nichtquotenerzeugung im Zuckersektor

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 30. Juni 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 30. Juni 2006

Seite 31, Zeile „ex 35“:

anstatt:

„Eiweißstoffe; modifizierte Stärke; Enzyme, ausgenommen Erzeugnisse der Position 3501 und der Unterpositionen 3505 10 10, 3505 10 90 und 3505 20“

muss es heißen:

„Eiweißstoffe; modifizierte Stärke; Klebstoffe; Enzyme, ausgenommen Erzeugnisse der Position 3501 und der Unterpositionen 3505 10 10, 3505 10 90 und 3505 20“.

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2155 

To suspend temporarily the duty on carbazole violet/acrylic dispersion. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on carbazole violet/acrylic 

dispersion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CARBAZOLE VIOLET/ACRYLIC DISPERSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Carbazole violet/acrylic dispersion (CAS No. 6358–30– 

1) (provided for in subheading 3204.17.90) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2155 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Centurion Bank

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of American Express Centurion Bank (AECB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related
Services Company, Inc. (TRS) pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2010, among TRS, AECB, American Express Bank, FSB, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation III LLC,
American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II (as amended from time to time (the Agreement), does hereby certify that:



|1. | AECB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | A review of AECBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AECB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 20th day of March, 2014.



|                                |  |                                        
|------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Kevin L. Thompson                  
|Name:                           |  | Kevin L. Thompson                      
|Title:                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Paul A. Thompson                   
|Name:                           |  | Paul A. Thompson                       
|Title:                          |  | Vice President  Controller, US Banking
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-63842, 333-66665 and 333-1718 on Form
S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-40167, 333-23575 and 333-14097 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 10, 2006, relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of APAC Customer Services, Inc. and management's report of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of APAC Customer Services, Inc. for the year ended January 1, 2006.

Deloitte &
Touche LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 10, 2006

---



QuickLinks
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JACOBS VEHICLE EQUIPMENT CO.,Plaintiff/Counterclaim DefendantCross Appellant,

AND

DANAHER CORPORATION,Counterclaim DefendantCross Appellant,

V

.

PACIFIC DIESEL BRAKE COMPANY

AND SHARLAMEN HOLDINGS, LTD., Defendants-Appellants,

AND

JENARA ENTERPRISES, LTD.,Defendant/CounterclaimantAppellant.

____________________

2012-1193, -1194

______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in case No. 93-CV-1093, Judge Robert N. Chatigny.______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

P ATRICK J. C OYNE , Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff/counterclaim defendant-cross appellants. Of
counsel on the brief were C HRISTOPHER B. M EAD , London and Mead, of Washington, DC, and M ARK L. A USTRIAN

, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP, of Washington, DC.

J OSEPH W. B ERENATO

, III, Berenato & White, LLC, of Bethesda, Maryland, argued for defendants appellants/counterclaimant appellant. With him on the
brief was D AVID S. T AYLOR . Of counsel was M ATTHEW S TAVISH

,

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (R ADER

, Chief Judge, D YK

, and R EYNA

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 16, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk
#### J. Edgar Butts, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Florida, Defendant in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida,

July 17, 1905.)

Writ -of Error to Criminal Court of Record, Duval County; John W. Dodge, Judge.

*Charles L. Fildes,*for Plaintiff in Error.

No appearance for the Defendant in Error.

This action was brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error. There was judgment for *624the plaintiff and the defendant takes writ of error. The writ of error is dismissed on praecipe of counsel for the Plaintiff in Error.