alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Tim DeHerrera                                              |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Tim DeHerrera                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  October 12, 2010                                                     |
# L_2006195DE.01002801.xml

| 15.7.2006 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 195/28 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------- | -------- |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 727/2006 der Kommission vom 12. Mai 2006 zur Eröffnung und Verwaltung eines Einfuhrzollkontingents für zur Verarbeitung bestimmtes gefrorenes Rindfleisch im Zeitraum 1. Juli 2006 bis 30. Juni 2007

(Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 126 vom 13. Mai 2006)

| 1. | Seite 10, Artikel 1, erste Zeile:
anstatt
:
„50 700 Tonnen“ muss es heißen
:
„54 703 Tonnen“. | anstatt | : | „50 700 Tonnen“ | muss es heißen | : | „54 703 Tonnen“. |
| -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | - | --------------- | -------------- | - | ---------------- |
| anstatt | : | „50 700 Tonnen“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „54 703 Tonnen“. | | | | | |

| 2. | Seite 10, Artikel 2, Absatz 1, erster Unterabsatz, fünfte Zeile:
anstatt
:
„0,45 %“ muss es heißen
:
„0,45“. | anstatt | : | „0,45 %“ | muss es heißen | : | „0,45“. |
| -------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | - | -------- | -------------- | - | ------- |
| anstatt | : | „0,45 %“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „0,45“. | | | | | |

| 3. | Seite 10, Artikel 2, Absatz 1, vierter Unterabsatz, vierte Zeile:
anstatt
:
„Magenschleimhaut“ muss es heißen
:
„Nierenzapfen“. | anstatt | : | „Magenschleimhaut“ | muss es heißen | : | „Nierenzapfen“. |
| -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------ | - | ------------------ | -------------- | - | --------------- |
| anstatt | : | „Magenschleimhaut“ | | | | | |
| muss es heißen | : | „Nierenzapfen“. | | | | | |

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FELIX OCTAVIO PICHARDO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50006

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00825-SVW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Felix Octavio Pichardo appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

96-month sentence for bank fraud and aiding and abetting and causing an act to be

done in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1344(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Pichardo’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no

FILED

DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50006

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. A

pro se supplemental brief has been filed.

Pichardo waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent review of

the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), indicates that

the appeal waiver is operative. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal in part. See

United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000). 

With regard to Pichardo’s conviction, our independent review of the record

discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal, and we affirm.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED in part; DISMISSED in part.
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 18, 2002 Session CAROLYN STOVALL, ET AL 

### . v. LOIS E. CLARKE, M.D., ET AL 

### .

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Williamson County

No. 97652 Russ Heldman, Judge

No. M2001-00810-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 20, 2002

W ILL IAM C. K OCH , J R ., J., concurring.

I concur withthe results of the court’s opinion but write separately to amplify the basis for upholding the summary judgment in favor of Dr. Robert W. McCain.

In opposition to Dr. McCa in’s motion for summary judgment, Ms. Stovall presented the affida vit of Dr . P eter Tut

eur, a pu lmonologist

like Dr. M cCain, wh o testifie d that Dr. McCain deviated from th e applicable standard of accepta ble professional practice by failing to “take an appropr iately detailed and mean

ingfully complete and pertinent history of Gail Dewayne Stovall.” Even if we accept this opinion as correct for the pur poses of the summary judgmentmotion, it does not addre ss anothe

r neces sary ingr

edient of any medic al malpra

ctice c laim.
Plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases must prove that the practitioner caused his or her patient to suffer injuries that would not have otherwise occurre d. T en n. Code Ann. § 29-26- 115(a)(3) (2000). Ms. Stovall’s causation expert, Dr. Ronald Krone, testified unequivocally that Mr. Stovall should have h ad card

iac by-p ass surge

ry by no la

ter than January 1997. Thus , at leas t according to Dr. Krone, the die was cast by the time that Dr. McCai n examined Mr. Stovall on February 28, 199 7. I find no thing in Dr. Tuteur’s affidavit or in any of the other evidentiary materia ls submitted by Ms. Stovall that explains how Dr. McCain’s failure to take a better history, if in fact the history he took was inadequate, caused Mr. Stoval l to suffer injuries that he would not otherwis e have suffer

ed. Without this evid

ence, Ms

. Stovall’s c laim agai nst Dr. Mc Cain must f ail.

_____________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2095 

To amend the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 

to authorize appropriations through fiscal year 2015. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Ms. MIKULSKI (for herself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 to authorize appropriations through 

fiscal year 2015. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS 

4 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2015. 

5 Section 3(c) of the National Great Black Americans 

6 Commemoration Act of 2004 is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Ambac Assurance Corporation:


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated  February 27,
2004 on the consolidated financial statements of Ambac Assurance Corporation and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended  December 31, 2003,  which report appears in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Ambac  Financial  Group,  Inc.,  which was filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on March  15,  2004 in the  Form  10-K of
Residential Accredit Loans, Inc. Our report refers to changes, in 2003, in Ambac
Assurance Corporation's methods of accounting for variable interest entities and
stock-based compensation.



New York, New York
March 29, 2004
LAW OFFICES
                   Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, L.L.P.
                   A REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
                           999 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E.
                                FIRST UNION PLAZA
                                   SUITE 1400
                             Atlanta, Georgia 30309
                            TELEPHONE (404) 817-6000
                            FACSIMILE (404) 817-6050
                                  www.nmrs.com


        Wade H. Stribling                                   OTHER OFFICES:    
         (404) 817-6126                              Charleston, South Carolina
 Internet Address: WXS@nmrs.com                       Charlotte, North Carolina
                                                      Columbia, South Carolina  
                                                     Greenville, South Carolina 
                                                    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
                                                  
                                January 13, 1999

Via Facsimile
-------------

To:  All Subscribers for Series D Preferred Stock of Harvest  Restaurant  Group,
     Inc.:

From: Wade H. Stribling, Esq.

     In connection with the closing of the TRC/Harvest merger and the concurrent
recapitalization  of Harvest,  you signed forms of a  Regulation D  Subscription
Agreement,  Registration  Rights  Agreement,  Warrant  Agreement  and an  Escrow
Agreement (collectively the "Subscription Documents").  The terms and conditions
of the Escrow  Agreement  require the Escrow  Agent to be in receipt of original
executed copies of the  Subscription  Documents as signed by each Subscriber and
the Issuing entity.  By signing below,  you acknowledge  your agreement to allow
the Escrow Agent to accept facsimile copies in lieu of original  executed copies
of the  Subscription  Documents,  and you  acknowledge  that  each  party to the
Subscription Documents may rely upon facsimile transmissions of the Subscription
Documents  by the  other  party and that such  Subscription  Documents  shall be
binding upon the executing party.  Your signature below indicates your agreement
with the foregoing and as such, the Subscription  Documents will be deemed to be
amended accordingly.  Once you have signed this letter agreement,  please fax it
to me immediately at (404) 817-6194.


     Please contact me at (404) 817-6126 if you have any questions or comments.

     AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED THIS 13th DAY OF JANUARY, 1999:

     ---------------------------------

     Name:
          ----------------------------
     Title:
           ---------------------------
Assumption Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.7 
 [CROWN CASTLE LETTERHEAD] 
 January 5, 2007 
 American Stock Transfer & Trust Company 
 59 Maiden Lane 
 Plaza Level 
 New York, New York 10038 
 Attention: Karen Trachtenberg 
 Reference is made to the warrant agreement, dated as of February 13, 2006 (the “Warrant
Agreement”), between Global Signal Inc. (“Global Signal”) and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent (“AST”). Effective as of the Effective Time (as defined in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
as of October 5, 2006, among Global Signal, Crown Castle International Corp. (“Crown Castle”) and CCGS Holdings LLC), this letter shall serve as the written assumption by Crown Castle, pursuant to Article VII of the Warrant Agreement, of
the obligations of Global Signal under the Warrant Agreement and under each of the warrants issued thereunder, including, without limitation, the obligation to deliver such securities, cash or property as may be required pursuant to Article 6
thereof. 
 Crown Castle and AST hereby acknowledge and agree that (i) AST shall continue to serve as warrant agent under the Warrant
Agreement after the Effective Time, subject to the terms of the Warrant Agreement, (ii) AST’s compensation by Crown Castle for such services as contemplated by Section 15.8 of the Warrant Agreement shall be $500 per month (to be prorated with
respect to any portion of any month) and (iii) AST may requisition shares of Crown Castle common stock from Mellon Investor Services LLC from time to time as required upon the exercise of warrants governed by the Warrant Agreement. 
  

			
	 Sincerely,
  
 CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP.

		
	By:	 	/s/ E. Blake Hawk
		 	 Name: E. Blake Hawk
 Title: Executive Vice President
and General Counsel


  

			
	 Agreed and acknowledged as of the
 date first
above written:
  
 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY

		
	By:	 	/s/ HJ Lemmer
		 	 Name: HJ Lemmer
 Title: Vice
President
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Crocs, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

 

(1)             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

 

(2)             The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: May 4, 2011 | /s/ John P. McCarvel                                            |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | John P. McCarvel                                                |
| * *               | *President and Chief Executive Officer*                         |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                   |
|                   |                                                            |
|                   | /s/ Jeffrey J. Lasher                                           |
|                   | Jeffrey J. Lasher                                               |
| * *               | *Senior Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial   Officer* |
|                   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                    |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Crocs, Inc. and will be retained by Crocs, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5636]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the Manager of 
Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: February 27, 2012.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                   Bank name                 City              State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10426...........................  Central Bank of Georgia.  Ellaville..........  GA                    2/24/2012
10427...........................  Home Savings of America.  Little Falls.......  MN                    2/24/2012
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-5636 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2174 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polyoxethylene-/alkyletherphosphate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. SPECTER (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on polyoxethylene-/ 

alkyletherphosphate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. POLYOXETHYLENE-/ALKYLETHERPHOSPHATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Polyoxethylene-/ 

alkyletherphosphate (CAS 

No. 68439–39–4) (provided 

for in subheading 

3402.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2174 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1879 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1879

  To clarify the tariff classification of certain fiberboard core and 
          laminate boards and panels, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2009

   Mr. Casey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the tariff classification of certain fiberboard core and 
          laminate boards and panels, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEDIUM DENSITY FIBERBOARD.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that, pursuant to Presidential 
Proclamation 8097, dated December 27, 2006 (72 Fed. Reg. 453), chapter 
44 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States was amended, 
effective February 3, 2007, to include laminate boards bonded in whole 
or in part, or impregnated, with synthetic resins as medium density 
fiberboard in the article descriptions for subheadings 4411.12.20, 
4411.13.20, and 4411.14.20.
    (b) Retroactive Application to Certain Entries.--Notwithstanding 
section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 
provision of law, upon proper request filed with U.S. Customs and 
Border Protection before the date that is 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse for 
consumption, of any goods described in subheading 4411.12.20, 
4411.13.20, or 4411.14.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States (as in effect on the day before the date of the enactment 
of this Act) that was made--
            (1) on or after January 1, 1994, and
            (2) on or before March 1, 2001,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the amendment described 
in subsection (a) applied to the entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
#### The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Lynn SHELBY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 860299.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Oct. 30, 1986.

Bryce K. Bryner, Price, for defendant and appellant.

David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is before us on counsel’s motion to withdraw after filing an Anders1 brief, in accordance with our opinion in *State v. Clayton,*639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The State opposes this motion to withdraw, arguing that counsel has failed to comply with step five as outlined in *Clayton, supra.*However, the brief contains a certificate of mailing showing that counsel has supplied defendant with a brief. In that certificate, counsel also states that the points requested by defendant have been raised in the brief. As counsel has complied with *Clayton,*we have examined the proceedings to determine whether the issues raised are arguable on appeal.

Defendant claims that the trial court erred in signing a judgment which provided for consecutive sentences for two separate convictions. Defendant contends that the court announced from the bench that the two sentences were to run concurrently. However, the transcript shows that the court stated that the two sentences were to run consecutively:

> And those sentences will run consecutively. In other words, the one sentence will begin as soon as the other one ends. They will not run concurrently.

Secondly, defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for additional time before sentencing within which to explore an in-patient drug treatment program, as an alternative to prison. However, in denying defendant’s motion, the trial judge stated that defendant had previously been placed on probation for this purpose and had committed an additional felony while on probation. The trial judge stated that defendant had not made any significant changes in his *988life and that he felt further probation would not be appropriate.

The trial court has discretion in sentencing under U.C.A., 1953, § 76-3-201 and may order sentences to run consecutively pursuant to section 76-3-401. This Court does not disturb a sentence unless it exceeds that prescribed by law or unless the trial court has abused its discretion. *State v. Gerrard,*584 P.2d 885 (Utah 1978). We find no such abuse of discretion here, and the sentence is within the limits prescribed by statute.

Our examination of the proceedings reveals that the issues raised are wholly without merit. Counsel’s request to withdraw is therefore granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

1

. *Anders*v. *California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).