Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Notices 15123 

Section 1161, Title 18 United States 

Code, Legalizing and Regulating the 

Introduction, Possession, Use and 

Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages, 

the Amended Liquor Ordinance of the 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians, was duly adopted by the TeMoak Tribal Council on October 5, 

2005. 

Dated: February 24, 2012. 

Jodi Gillette, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs. 

Amendment #(05–ORD–TM–05) to the TeMoak Liquor Ordinance reads as follows: 

Ordinance pursuant to Section 1161, Title 18 

United States Code, Legalizing and 

Regulating the Introduction, Possession, Use 

and Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages 

Now, therefore, be enacted by the Te-Moak 

Tribal Council of the Te-Moak Tribe of 

Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada, that 

pursuant to the authority vested in it by 

Article VII, Section 1(f) of the Constitution of 

the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada, and Article II, Section 1 

of the By-Laws of the Te-Moak Tribe of 

Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada, that 

the introduction, possession, use and 

consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be 

lawful within the exterior boundaries of 

those lands in the State of Nevada under the 

territorial jurisdiction of the Te-Moak Tribe 

of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada. 

Provided that such introduction, possession, 

use and consumption shall be in accordance 

with the following: 

SECTION 1: 

(a) It shall be unlawful to sell alcoholic 

beverages by the bottle, drink, can, or other 

package within the exterior boundaries of 

those lands of the State of Nevada under the 

territorial jurisdiction of the Te-Moak Tribe 

of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada, 

without first obtaining a valid license issued 

by the Te-Moak Tribal Council. 

(b) Such tribal license will authorize the 

holder thereof to sell alcoholic beverages at 

retail in cans, bottles or other packages, or by 

the drink for consumption on the premises or 

within a defined area. 

(c) Such tribal license shall set forth the 

location and description of the building and 

premises or defined area where such sales 

may be made and for which said license is 

issued. 

(d) No such license shall be issued without 

the approval of the local governing body of 

the Colony or Reservation of the Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada, upon the territory of which the 

proposed alcoholic beverage business is 

seeking to be licensed. 

(e) No such license shall be transferred 

without the prior consent of the Te-Moak 

Tribal Council. 

(f) Te-Moak Tribal Council shall establish 

the different categories of licenses and the 

license fee schedules annually by a duly 

passed resolution. 

(g) Any such license fee collected by the 

Te-Moak Tribal Council shall remain within 

the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

Indians of Nevada upon receipt of fees 

collected from the local governing body of 

the Colony or Reservation of the Te-Moak 

Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of 

Nevada upon the territory of which the 

alcoholic beverage business has been 

licensed. 

SECTION 2: 

It shall be unlawful to use or consume any 

alcoholic beverages in a motor vehicle while 

such vehicle is being driven. 

SECTION 3: 

It shall be unlawful to possess any open 

bottle, can package or container of alcoholic 

beverage in the passenger compartment of a 

motor vehicle when such vehicle is being 

driven. 

SECTION 4: 

It shall be unlawful for any person actually 

under the influence of alcoholic beverages to 

possess, use or consume alcoholic beverages. 

SECTION 5: 

It shall be unlawful for any person to 

furnish any alcoholic beverage to any person 

under the age of twenty-one (21) years to 

leave or to deposit any alcoholic beverages 

with the intent that the alcoholic beverages 

shall be procured by any person under the 

age of twenty-one (21) years. 

SECTION 6: 

It shall be unlawful for any person under 

the age of twenty-one (21) years of age to 

introduce, possess, use or consume alcoholic 

beverages. 

SECTION 7: 

Any Indian who violates any of the 

provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed 

guilty of an offense and upon conviction 

thereof shall be punished by a fine of not 

more that $300.00 or by imprisonment of not 

more than sixty (60) days or both such fine 

and imprisonment: Provided, however, that 

any person under the age of eighteen (18) 

years may, in the discretion of the Judge, be 

treated as a juvenile and have the charge(s) 

disposed of pursuant to applicable juvenile 

law and procedures. 

SECTION 8: 

When a non-Indian violates any provision 

of this ordinance, he or she shall be referred 

to the State and/or Federal authorities for 

prosecution under applicable law. 

SECTION 9: 

Any licensee violating any provision of 

this ordinance may have said licensee’s 

license suspended or revoked by the TeMoak Tribal Council provided that the 

licensee is given a written notice of the 

proposed suspension or revocation and 

afforded an opportunity of a hearing. 

SECTION 10: 

All ordinances, resolutions or acts that 

have previously been enacted by the TeMoak Tribal Council, which are in conflict 

with any provision of this ordinance are 

hereby repealed. 

CERTIFICATION 

I, the undersigned, as Chairman of the 

Tribal Council of the Te-Moak Tribe of 

Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada do 

hereby certify that the Te-Moak Western 

Shoshone Council is composed of 10 

members of whom 9 constituting a quorum 

were present at a duly held meeting on 

October 5, 2005, and that the foregoing 

ordinance was duly adopted at such meeting 

by an affirmative vote of 4 For, 3 Against, and 

2 Abstention, pursuant to the authority 

contained under Article 4, Section 3(n) of the 

Constitution of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western 

Shoshone Indians of Nevada and that said 

ordinance has not been rescinded in any 

form. 

/s/ Hugh Stevens, Chairman, 

Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone 

ATTEST: 

/s/ Vera Johnny, Acting Recording Secretary 

Te-Moak Tribal Council 

[FR Doc. 2012–6129 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–891 (Second 

Review)] 

Foundry Coke From China; Scheduling 

of an Expedited Five-Year Review 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of an expedited 

review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(3)) (the Act) to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on foundry coke from China 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of material injury within 

a reasonably foreseeable time. For 

further information concerning the 

conduct of this review and rules of 

general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A through 

E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

DATES: Effective Date: March 5, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela M.W. Newell (202–708–5409), 

Office of Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436. 

Hearing-impaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
15124 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 14, 2012 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s Web site. 

2The Commission has found the responses 

submitted by ABC Coke, Erie Coke, Tonawanda 

Coke Corporation, and Walter Coke Co. to be 

individually adequate. Comments from other 

interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 

207.62(d)(2)). 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this review may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On March 5, 2012, the 

Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (76 

FR 74810, December 1, 2011) of the 

subject five-year review was adequate 

and that the respondent interested party 

group response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct an expedited review 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act. 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the review will be 

placed in the nonpublic record on April 

2, 2012, and made available to persons 

on the Administrative Protective Order 

service list for this review. A public 

version will be issued thereafter, 

pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s 

rules, interested parties that are parties 

to the review and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,2 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

review may file written comments with 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the review. 

Comments are due on or before April 5, 

2012 and may not contain new factual 

information. Any person that is neither 

a party to the five-year review nor an 

interested party may submit a brief 

written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the review by April 5, 2012. 

However, should the Department of 

Commerce extend the time limit for its 

completion of the final results of its 

review, the deadline for comments 

(which may not contain new factual 

information) on Commerce’s final 

results is three business days after the 

issuance of Commerce’s results. If 

comments contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of sections 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. Please be aware that the 

Commission’s rules with respect to 

electronic filing have been amended. 

The amendments took effect on 

November 7, 2011. See 76 Fed. Reg. 

61937 (Oct. 6, 2011) and the newly 

revised Commission’s Handbook on E– 

Filing, available on the Commission’s 

Web site at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

In accordance with sections 201.16(c) 

and 207.3 of the rules, each document 

filed by a party to the review must be 

served on all other parties to the review 

(as identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined to exercise its authority to 

extend the review period by up to 90 

days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: This review is being conducted 

under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act 

of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to 

section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 8, 2012. 

James R. Holbein, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

WORK SCHEDULE 

Investigation No. 731–TA–891 (Second 

Review) 

FOUNDRY COKE FROM CHINA 

Staff Assigned 

Investigator ..................................................................................................................................................................................... Angela Newell (708–5409). 

Commodity-Industry Analyst ........................................................................................................................................................ Cynthia Foreso (205–3348). 

Attorney .......................................................................................................................................................................................... Charles St. Charles (205–2782). 

Supervisory Investigator ................................................................................................................................................................ Elizabeth Haines (205–3200). 

DATE 

Institution .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... December 1, 2011. 

Report to the Commission: 

Draft to Supervisory Investigator ........................................................................................................................................................................ March 16, 2012. 

Draft to Senior Review ........................................................................................................................................................................................ March 26. 

To the Commission .............................................................................................................................................................................................. April 2. 

Comments of Parties due1: ......................................................................................................................................................................................... April 5. 

Legal issues memorandum to the Commission ......................................................................................................................................................... May 10. 

Briefing and vote (suggested date) ............................................................................................................................................................................. May 16. 

Determination and views to Commerce ..................................................................................................................................................................... May 29, 2012. 

1 If comments contain business proprietary information, a nonbusiness proprietary version is due the following business day. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6065 Filed 3–13–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree 

Under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

February 21, 2012, a proposed Consent 

Decree in United States v. FMC 

Corporation, Civil Action No. 2:11-cv00699 (‘‘FMC’’) was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Alabama. 

In FMC, the United States of America 

(‘‘United States’’), on behalf of the 

Administrator of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’), filed a complaint pursuant to 

Section 107 of the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act of 

1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 

U.S.C. 9607, seeking reimbursement of 

response costs incurred between 2005 

and 2007 stemming from an EPA 

emergency removal action cleaning up 

hazardous substances at the 

Performance Advantage Superfund Site 

in Coosa County, Alabama. In response, 

FMC filed a counterclaim against the 

United States. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

resolves all claims and counterclaims in 

this action. Under the Consent Decree, 

Defendant FMC will pay a total of 

$300,000, plus interest, to the EPA’s 

Hazardous Substance Superfund, and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES