alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.2

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Amex Card Services Company

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

American Express Issuance Trust

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Amex Card Services Company (ACSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related
Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Subservicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006, and the Subservicing Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2013, each between TRS and ACSC (together, the Agreements), does
hereby certify that:



|1. | ACSC performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under each Agreement.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | A review of ACSCs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under each Agreement has been made under my supervision.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, ACSC has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under each Agreement throughout the reporting period.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Anderson Y. Lee, Kevin L. Thompson, Denise D. Roberts and Kanchan Roy are authorized to rely on this Certification in connection with their Sarbanes-Oxley and Regulation AB Item 1123 Certifications for the
Reporting Period.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 20th day of March, 2014.



|                           |  |                                       
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|AMEX CARD SERVICES COMPANY
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ James J. Higgins                  
|                           |  | James J. Higgins                      
|                           |  | Chairperson of the Board of Directors 
|                           |  | American Express Card Services Company
#### In the Matter of Argyle Zoning Commission, Appellant, v Town of Argyle, Respondent.

Levine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Dier, J.), entered June 19, 1990 in Washington County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action.

Petitioner was created and its members appointed by respondent pursuant to Town Law § 266 in 1988. Thereafter, petitioner commenced and continued performance of its duties until February 14, 1990, when respondent voted to replace petitioner’s members effective March 1, 1990. At that time, petitioner had not submitted its final report to respondent *(see,*Town Law § 266). Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging respondent’s action as arbitrary and capricious and seeking reinstatement of its members. Respondent moved to dismiss the petition for failure to *1061state a cause of action. Supreme Court granted that motion and this appeal ensued.

Petitioner’s sole contention on this appeal is that respondent was precluded from unilaterally removing members allegedly without cause and prior to the completion and submission of its final report. We disagree. Town Law § 266 provides that "[i]n order to avail itself of the powers conferred by this article, [a] town board shall appoint a commission to be known as the zoning commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original districts and appropriate regulations to be enforced therein”. This provision, while clearly mandating the appointment of a zoning commission, is silent as to the term of office for the members of such commission. Where, as here, the duration of an office is not specified by the State Constitution or by law, the office is "held during the pleasure of the authority making the appointment” (NY Const, art XIII, § 2; *see, Matter of Lake v Binghamton Hous. Auth.,*130 AD2d 913, 914; 8 Opns St Comp, 1952, at 81).

It follows from the foregoing that in this case, petitioner served at the pleasure of respondent and, thus, its members were at will appointees subject to removal by respondent at any time. Petitioner’s attempt to equate its rights with those of a planning board is unavailing. Pursuant to Town Law § 271 (1), members of a planning board serve for specified terms and may only be removed for cause and after a hearing. Town Law § 266, however, affords no similar statutory protections to members of a zoning commission. Accordingly, Supreme Court correctly determined that petitioner failed to state a cause of action and the judgment dismissing the petition should be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Casey, J. P., Mikoll, Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906**

 

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350)**

 

The undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Emergency Medical ServicesCorporation, as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P., a Delawarelimited partnership (the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof:

 

(a)       the Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,2010, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(b)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ William A. Sanger                                                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | William A. Sanger                                                                              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                        |
|   | Emergency Medical Services  Corporation, as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. |
|   | November 4, 2010                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                           |
|   | /s/ Randel G. Owen                                                                             |
|   | Randel G. Owen                                                                                 |
|   | Chief Financial Officer                                                                        |
|   | Emergency Medical Services  Corporation, as general partner of Emergency Medical Services L.P. |
|   | November 4, 2010                                                                          |

 

----
# L_2006335EN.01003601.xml

| 1.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/36

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1774/2006

of 30 November 2006

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

An invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley to certain third countries was opened pursuant to Commission Regulation (EC) No 935/2006 (2).

| (2) | Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1501/95 of 29 June 1995 laying down certain detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1766/92 on the granting of export refunds on cereals and the measures to be taken in the event of disturbance on the market for cereals (3), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

| (3) | On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of the criteria laid down in Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1501/95, a maximum refund should not be fixed.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 24 to 30 November 2006 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 935/2006.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78. Regulation as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2005 (OJ L 187, 19.7.2005, p. 11).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 172, 24.6.2006, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

3

---
SERVED: MARCH 12.2012 

JEPARTMEN"^OF 

U.S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION :-;:v:f'§f;.Ojil(^;^^^ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -'-^^^' OPcRATlOrJJ 

WASHTNGTON, DC 

im m 12 -p 2-- 2"] 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MIDWEST JET CHARTER, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0029 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011 -GL-19-0024) has been , 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0029 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Tim Lodes 

Director of Human Resources 

Midwest Jet Charter, Inc. 

412 Airport Road 

Mattoon, IL 61938 

Briana Martino, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AGL-7 

Great Lakes Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue ' 

DesPlaines, IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7313. 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of.Transpqrtation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL:. 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service id person or by expedited courier, use llic following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

DC 20591. Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-43a. 

^2-
#### Gretchen G. LEININGER, Plaintiff, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF UTAH, Department of Employment Security, Defendant.

No. 19048.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Oct. 17, 1983.

*95Gretchen G. Leininger, pro se.

K. Allan Zabel, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for defendant.

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the Board of Review acquiesces in the position taken by plaintiff that the evidence in the record does not support its decision terminating plaintiff’s unemployment benefits under U.C.A., 1953, § 35-4-5(g).

Plaintiff is a registered nurse, and was employed by St. Mark’s Hospital in Salt Lake City from July 1,1975, to January 19, 1982, when she was discharged. She had been working a shift from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. during the last year of her employment. Plaintiff applied for and received unemployment compensation until September 26, 1982. She had enrolled in the University of Utah during the fall quarter of 1982 for two courses and began attending classes from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. for five days during the week, beginning September 27, 1982. Plaintiff obtained full-time employment as a nurse on November 29,1982, again working the 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. shift, and continued her classes while working full-time.

The Board terminated plaintiff’s unemployment benefits under U.C.A., 1953, § 35-4-5(g), having determined that plaintiff did not qualify under any of the exceptions in that section. In doing so, the Board failed to follow the Commission’s general Rules of Adjudication, Able and Available, § 40, which provides in part:

> The important factor to bear in mind is the evidence of school attendance and work history must clearly demonstrate that the claimant is primarily a member of the work force and only secondarily a student.

> Whenever a claimant begins school attendance after becoming unemployed, he/she is under the same obligation to show that the hours of school attendance would not require any rearrangement of his/her regular working hours in order to accommodate the school attendance.

The evidence clearly shows that plaintiff’s hours of school did not require any rearrangement of her regular working hours in order to accommodate school attendance, and that she is primarily a member of the work force and only secondarily a student.

In acquiescing in plaintiff’s position, the Board requests this Court to reverse its decision and remand the ease for the purpose of allowing plaintiff benefits for the period beginning September 26, 1982, and ending November 28, 1982. So ordered.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerApril 25, 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CertificationPursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofDynCorp International LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 29,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Herbert J. Lanese, Chief Executive Officer,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: February 12, 2007 | /s/ HERBERT J.  LANESE                                    |   |
|------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         | Herbert J. Lanese                                         |
|                         | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                         | (principal executive officer)                             |

 

----
Exhibit
23.2




FREEDMAN
& GOLDBERG




CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




A
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION




ERIC
      W. FREEDMAN
                                  
                                  31150
      NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY, SUITE 200
                                  
                                  KAREN
      E. LONGMICHAEL
      GOLDBERG
                                  
                                  FARMINGTON
      HILLS, MICHIGAN 48334
                                  
                                  GLORIA
      K. MOOREDAVID
      C. GREIP
                                  
                                  (248)
      626-2400
                                  
                                  MICHAEL
      GOULDJULIE
      A. CHEEK
                                  
                                  FAX:
      (248) 626-4298
                                  
                                  CHRISTINE
      L. MILLERJUDITH
      A.
COOPER





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 1,2009 relating
to the consolidated financial statements of i2 Telecom International, Inc. and
Subsidiaries appearing in this Annual Report on Form 1O-K of Geos Communications
(formerly known as i2 Telecom International, Inc. and Subsidiaries) for the
year ended December 31, 2009.




/s/
      Freedman & Goldberg, CPAs, PCFarmington
      Hills, MIMay
      5, 2010
#### Alexander SCHALLER, Appellant, v. The BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO., Appellee.

No. 8434.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 17, 1940.

Samuel Cohen, of Chicago, Ill., and Herman A. Stockstill, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellant.

Tyler, Wilson & Rhinefort, of Toledo, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

*1020PER CURIAM.

It is ordered that this appeal be dismissed at the cost of the appellant, pursuant to stipulation of counsel.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Triple Crown Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his individual knowledge and belief:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2008



|        |  |                                                     
|------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Signed: |  | /s/ MARK G. MEIKLE                                  
|        |  | Mark G. Meikle                                      
|        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, regardless of any general incorporation language in said filing.