T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). K A D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B AY AR DO E DWI NS I N P AV ON T E J AD A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 70452 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 292- 070 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B a y a r do E dw i ns i n P a von T e j a da , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of H ondur a s , pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

aB o a r do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f r o m an i mmi g r a t i o n j u d g e ’ s d e c i s i o n d e n y i n g h i s ap p l i c a t i o n f o ra s y l u m, 

# FI LED FEB 24 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSK AD / Res ea r ch 08- 70452 2 w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and p rot ec t i on un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ” ) . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo q u e s tio n s o f

law , C er ez o v. Mukasey, 512 F . 3d 1163, 1166 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , e xc e pt t o the e xt e nttha tde f

e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the gove rni ng s ta tu te s a n dr e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 1 F .3 d5 3 2 , 5 3 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e r e v ie w f

a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e , Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 738, 742 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . W e de nyi n pa rta nd di s m i s s i n pa rtthe pe t i t i on f o rr e v i e w. W e r e j e c tT e j a da ’ s c l a i m tha the i s e l i gi bl e f ora s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of r e m o v a l o n a c c o u n t o f

h is a n ti- g a n g p o litic a l o p in io n , o rb a s e do n h is m e m b e r s h ip in ap a rtic u lars o c ia l g r o up . See B a rri o s v. H o lder, 58 1 F . 3d 84 9, 85 5-56 (9th C i r. 20 09 ); Sa n to s -L e m u s , 5 4 2 F .3 da t 7 4 5 - 4 6 . A c c o r d in g ly , b e c au s e T e ja d af a ile dto s h o w h e wa s p e r s e c u t e do rf e a r s p e r s e c u t i o n o n a c c o u n to f ap r o t e c t e dg r o u n d , we d e n yth e p e titio n a s to h is a s y lu m a n dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s . Se e B arr i os , 581 F . 3d a t856. S ub st an t i al ev i d en ce al so sup p o rt s th e B IA ’ s d en i al o f C A T rel i ef b ecau se T e j a dadi d note s t abl i s h al i ke l i hood of t ortur e by , a tthe i ns t i ga t i on of , orw i th the c o n s e n t o ra c q u ie s c e n c e o f th e H o n du r a n g o v e rn m e n t. See A rteaga v. Mukasey , 51 1 F . 3d 94 0, 94 8-49 (9th C i r. 20 07 ).K AD / Res ea r ch 08- 70452 3 W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rT e j a da ’ s due pr oc e s s c l a i m be c aus e he f a ile dto e x h au s t it b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c ro ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 677- 78 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.