alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      1350
      CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO\ 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report
      of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
      endedApril 30, 2007as
      filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert B. Dillon,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      these financial statements were not reviewed by our independent registered
      public accountants; and





2.
      The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.











Date:December
      21, 2007





/s/
RobertB.Dillon


Chief
      Executive
      Officer
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2308 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 

equipment for molding. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. BROWN (for himself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on certain 

manufacturing equipment for molding. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT FOR 

4 MOLDING. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.84.88 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 certain manufacturing equipment for molding) is amended 

8 by striking the date in the effective column period and 

9 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2308 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
August 6, 2015

Mr. Steven Hall

Innovative Marketing Solutions, Inc.

12485 Rhode Island Avenue

Savage, MN 55378

Dear Mr. Hall:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a); 61.113(b); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1);

91.409(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 

30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your June 1, 2015, exemption request into the public docket 

(No. FAA−2015−2220), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT GIDEON SAHAT PER

W IR A SIHOTANG, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-71271 Age n c y No. A078-020-208 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Gide on Sa

hat Pe rwira

Sihota ng, a native and c itiz e n of Indone sia , pe titions for re vie w of the B o a

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing his m otion to re o pe n . Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a buse o f disc re tion the de n i a l of a m o tion to re ope n. N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 

# F IL ED OCT 03 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion by

de ny ing Sihota

ng’ s se c ond m otion to re ope n a s untim e l y

and num be r-barre d, whe re Sihota

ng file d the m otion six y e ars a fte r the B IA’ s fina l de c ision, se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), and fa i le d to e sta blish m ate ria lly

c ha nge d c irc um sta

nc e s in Indone sia to qua lify for the re gula tory e xc e p tion to the

tim e and num

b e r lim ita tions, se e id. § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 987-89 (e vide nc e of c ha nge d c irc um sta

nc e s m ust be qua lita tive ly diffe re nt from

what c o uld ha

ve be e n pre se nte d

at prior he aring). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r the B IA’ s disc re tiona ry de c i sion not to re ope n proc e e d ings sua

sponte pursua

nt to 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(a). Se e MejiaHe rnande z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011); s e e also Matter of GD-, 22 I. & N. De c . 1132, 1135 (B IA 1999) (B IA’ s c onside ration of whe the r a funda m e nta l c h a

nge in the la

wwa rrants re ope ning involve s a n e xe rc ise of its sua sponte a uthority). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 2 - 7 1 2 7 1 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
ARV Assisted Living, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form 
S-8 of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 
1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year 
ended December 31, 1998, the nine-month period ended December 31, 1997 and the 
year ended March 31, 1997 and all related schedules, which report appears in 
the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form 10-K of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. 
and subsidiaries.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Orange County, California
March 31, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 1
          - [REG-130777-11]
          - RIN 1545-BK45

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Cancellation of notice of public hearing on proposed rulemaking.

# SUMMARY:

                        This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations                               ( print page 15320)                            (REG-130777-11), providing guidance on the tax treatment of Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities issued with more than a de minimis amount of premium.                    

# DATES:

The public hearing originally scheduled for March 28, 2012 at 10 a.m., is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Funmi Taylor of the Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), at (202) 622-7180 (not a toll-free number).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    A notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations and notice of public hearing that appeared in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Monday, December 5, 2011 (76 FR 75829), announced that a public hearing was scheduled for March 28, 2012, at 10 a.m., in the IRS Auditorium, Internal Revenue Service Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The subject of the public hearing is under section 1275 of the Internal Revenue Code.                

The public comment period for these regulations expired on March 7, 2012. The notice of proposed rulemaking by cross-reference to temporary regulations and notice of public hearing, instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing to submit a request to speak and an outline of the topics to be addressed. As of Monday, March 12, 2012, no one has requested to speak. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for March 28, 2012, is cancelled.

LaNita Van Dyke,

Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedures and Administration).

[FR Doc. 2012-6212 Filed 3-14-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07518

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 07518\07518_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07518\07518_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 07518\07518_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07518\07518_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07518\07518_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07518\07518_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07518\07518_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

07518\Certification Statement Plant ID 07518.pdf Plant certification statement

07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Bottom Ash PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Deadline Extension Approval.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_Hanford aerial map.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 07518\Supplemental Documents\07518_S8_Water Discharge Sketch_091509.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

07518\Supplemental Documents\Hanford PP ID-07518 FLY ASH PID.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
### The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 96-2308

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. James Turner, * * [PUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 28, 1996 Filed: August 30, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
James Turner challenges the 135-month sentence imposed by th e District Court following his guilty plea to conspiring to distribut e 1 coc aine and cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 84 6 (1994). Turner conte nds the District Court erred in calculating his base offense level, because authorities engaged in sentencing manipulation by length ening their investigation and arranging more drug buys merely t o increase his sentence. We reject Turner's sentencing-manipu lation argument. The three drug purchases at issue here involved increasingly la rger amounts, and resulted in the accumulation of evidence sufficient to

### -2-

arrest Turner's co-conspirator. Cf. United States v. Shephard , 4 F.3d 647 , 649 (8 th Cir. 1993) (approving chain of transactions between undercove r agent and drug dealer to ascertain what drug quantity defendant was willin g and able to deal), cert. denied , 510 U.S. 1203 (1994); United States v . Barth , 990 F.2d 422, 425 (8th Cir. 1993) (repeated buys may be necessary to gain drug dealer's confidence); United States v. Calva , 979 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir. 1992) (police must be given leeway to probe depth and extent of criminal enterprise, determine whether co-con spirators exist, and trace drugdeeper into distribution hierarchy). We thus conclude the District Court did not err in calculating Turner's base offense level. Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
MEMORANDUM

State

of Alaska Department

of Law TO:

Hon.

Larry

Hartig

DATE:

March

19, 2009 Commissioner Department

of Environmental

Conservation

FILE

NO.: 993-09-0053 TELEPHONE

NO.: 465-3600 FROM:

Steven

C. Weaver

SUBJECT: Regulations

re: state

air quality Assistant

Attorney

General

control

plan

(18 AAC 50.030(2); Legislation/Regulations

Section—Juneau

18 AAC 50.075(c)) Under

AS 44.62.060,

we have reviewed

the attached regulations

changes

by

the Department

of Environmental

Conservation,

and approve

the changes

for filing

by

the lieutenant governor.

I have reviewed

this project

under

a specific delegation

dated

March

10, 2009

from the Regulations

Attorney.

A duplicate

original

of this memorandum

is being furnished

to

the lieutenant

governor,

along

with

the

two pages

of regulations

and

the related documents. You might

wish

to contact

the lieutenant

governor’s

office

to confirm

the filing

date

and effective

date

of the attached regulation

changes. The January

1, 2009 public

notice

and

the March

18, 2009 adoption

order

both

state

that this action

is not expected

to require

an increased appropriation.

Therefore,

a fiscal

note under AS 44.62.195

is not required. Scw cc w/enc

Gary Mendivil, Regulations

ConLact Depaflrnent

of Environmental

ConservaLion Scott Sloane Division

of Air Quality Dvpaitnwnt

of Envirciimentai

Conscrvatio4l Tim Twomey Assistant

Attorney

General Environmental Section--AnchorageRegister—,2009ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATIONThelead-inlanguageof18AAC50.030isamendedtoread:18AAC50.030.StateairqualitycoDtrolplan.VolumesIIandIIIoftheStateAirQualityControlPlanforimplementingandenforcingtheprovisionsofAS46.14andthischapter,asamendedthroughFebruary20.2009[APRIL4,2008],areadoptedbyreference.Theplanincludesthefollowingdocumentswhicharealsoadoptedbyreference:iSAAC50.030(2)isamendedtoread:(2)theCodeoftheCityandBoroughofJuneau,Alaska,Chapter36.40,amendedbytheprovisionsofOrdinanceoftheCityandBoroughofJuneau,Alaska,SerialNo.2008-28,sec.2[91-52];(Eff.1/18/97,Register141;am6/21/98,Register146;am9/4/98,Register147;am1/1/2000,Register152;am12/30/2000,Register156;am9/21/2001,Register159;am1/27/2002,Register161;am3/27/2002,Register161;am5/3/2002,Register162;am2/20/2004,Register169;am6/24/2004,Register170;am10/1/2004,Register171;am12/14/2006,Register180;am12/30/2007,Register184;am5/17/2008,Register186;am7/25/2008,Register187;am11/9/2008,Register188;am_/_/,Register_____Authority:AS46.03.020AS46.14.030Sec.30,ch.74,SLA1993AS46.14.020AS46.14.14018AAC50.075(c)isamendedtoread:(c)IntheMendenhallValleywoodsmokecontrolareaidentifiedin18AAC50.025(b),Register—,___2009ENVIRONMENTALCONSERVATIONapersonmaynotviolateorcauseaviolationofaprovisionoftheCodeoftheCityandBoroughofJuneau,Alaska,Chapter36.40,asamendedbytheprovisionsoftheOrdinanceoftheCityandBoroughofJuneau,Alaska,SerialNo.2008-28,sec.2[91-52],adoptedbyreferencein18AAC50.030.(Eff.1/18/97,Register141;amj_/,Register____Authority:AS46.03.020AS46.14.020Sec.30,ch.74,SLA1993AS46.14.010AS46.14.030
EXHIBIT
31.1






CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Jason
Smart, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Zandaria Ventures,
Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b.
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and




c.
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a. all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b. any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
November 9,
2009





/s/
Jason
Smart


Jason
Smart


Chief
Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in these Registration Statement Nos. 333-63842, 333-66665 and 333-1718 on Forms
S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-40167, 333-23575 and 333-14097 on Forms S-3 of APAC Customer Services, Inc. of our reports
dated March 2, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements of APAC Customer Services, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 28, 2003 and December 29, 2002
(which reports express an unqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting principle and to the application of procedures relating to certain disclosures of
financial statement amounts related to the 2001 financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of
assurance other than with respect to such disclosures) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APAC Customer Services, Inc. for the years ended December 28,
2003 and December 29, 2002.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 12, 2004

---

QuickLinks
REGULATORY EV ALUA nON

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-163-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (2 work hour(s) x $85/hour)

Parts per airplane

Cost per airplane

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes

Total fleet cost

$ 170

$

+

.*

$ 170

,

800

$136,000

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the: (i) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-87658) pertaining to the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1993 Incentive Stock Option Plan and the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-91624) pertaining to the ValuJet Airlines, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-98568) pertaining to the Airways Corporation 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-62863) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., (v) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-83048) of ValuJet Airlines, Inc., (vi) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-82727) pertaining to the AirTran 1996 Stock Option Plan, (vii) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-41480) of AirTran Holdings, Inc., (viii) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103209) pertaining to the AirTran Holdings, Inc. 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, (ix) Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-67300) of AirTran Airways, Inc., and (x) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107415) of AirTran Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of AirTran Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 11, 2004