alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  DECEMBER  31,  1999  AND  THE  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF  OPERATIONS  FOR THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1999 OF TALK.COM INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           000948545
<NAME>                          TALK.COM INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<CURRENCY>                      US-DOLLARS

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                        JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                 1
<CASH>                                                $78,937,000
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          64,512,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            5,011,000
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      150,893,000
<PP&E>                                                 70,773,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                         13,438,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        215,008,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  63,768,000
<BONDS>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                  670,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             39,433,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          215,008,000
<SALES>                                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      516,548,000
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         320,751,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      136,242,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      4,667,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        57,699,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    57,699,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        21,230,000
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                           78,929,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                                  1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                1.23


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.3

Certification

I, Denise D. Roberts,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Credit Account Master Trust (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of
New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).



|       |  |                                                                                                                 
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  |  | March 20, 2014                                                                                                  
|       | 
|By:    |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                                                                                           
|Name:  |  | Denise D. Roberts                                                                                               
|Title: |  | President American Express Receivables Financing Corporation IV LLC
(senior officer in charge of securitization)
Exhibit 32
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
   Dated: November 23, 2009
    /s/ Bob MarbutName:
    Bob MarbutTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerDated: November 23, 2009
    /s/ Sam YoungbloodName:
    Sam YoungbloodTitle:
    President and Chief Operating OfficerDated: November 23, 2009
    /s/ Donald F. NevilleName:
    Donald F. NevilleTitle:
    Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial OfficerDated: November 23, 2009
    /s/ Dean A. DresserName:
    Dean A. DresserTitle:
    Vice President and Corporate Controller
EXHIBIT 10.63

                               SECOND ADDENDUM TO
                         AUTOMOTIVE WHOLESALE FINANCING
                             AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


     This  Second  Addendum  to  Automotive  Wholesale  Financing  and  Security
Agreement   ("Second   Addendum")  is  made  between  NISSAN  MOTOR   ACCEPTANCE
CORPORATION ("NMAC") and FIRST CHOICE STUART 1, INC., a Florida corporation, dba
Stuart Nissan ("Dealer") effective as of August 11, 1997.

     For good and valuable  consideration,  the receipt and sufficiency of which
is  hereby  acknowledged,  NMAC  and  Dealer  hereby  agree  to  supplement  the
Automotive  Wholesale  Financing and Security Agreement between NMAC and Dealer,
dated  as of July  21,  1997  as  supplemented  by the  Addendum  to  Automotive
Wholesale Financing and Security Agreement dated July 21, 1997 (collectively the
"Agreement"), as follows:

          "Dealer  agrees that the Agreement  will terminate upon the earlier of
          the following:

                           1)  December  31,  1997,  and  the  unpaid  Principal
                  together  with all accrued and unpaid  interest  and all other
                  fees,  costs and  charges  due and owing  under the  Agreement
                  shall immediately be accelerated and be due in full; or

                           2) Should  Smart  Choice  Automotive  Group,  Inc., a
                  Florida corporation  (and/or its successors or assigns),  sell
                  stock  pursuant to an  underwritten  public  offering prior to
                  December  31, 1997,  the unpaid  Principal  together  with all
                  accrued  and unpaid  interest  and all other  fees,  costs and
                  charges due and owing under the Agreement shall immediately be
                  accelerated and be due and payable in full."

     Except as expressly  modified in this Second Addendum,  the Agreement shall
remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


                                       FIRST CHOICE STUART 1, INC.,
                                       a Florida corporation

                                       James Neal Hutchinson, Jr.
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       By:
                                       Its:
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1878 

To extend and amend the temporary duty suspension on certain thin 

fiberglass sheets. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend and amend the temporary duty suspension on 

certain thin fiberglass sheets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN FIBERGLASS SHEETS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.70.19 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘approximately .0125 inches 

8 thick’’ and inserting ‘‘that are approximately 0.40 

9 millimeters to 1.65 millimeters thick’’; and 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1878 IS

1 (2) by striking the date in the effective period 

2 column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 21, 2022

No. 04-20-00583-CV

Kevin DOTY and Elizabeth Doty,

Appellants

v.

Richard DAVIDSON and Javline Ranch (a General Partnership), a/k/a Javelin Ranch, a/k/a 

Javelin Ranch, LP,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-15-100

Honorable Leonel Alejandro, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

 Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellees’ motion for rehearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.3.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2047 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2047

    To suspend temporarily the duty on horizontal machining center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on horizontal machining center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HORIZONTAL MACHINING CENTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Horizontal          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        machining center                                                   31/2011.......
                        with true 5 axis
                        simultaneous
                        contouring
                        capability having
                        the following
                        specifications:
                        with fully
                        automated 800 mm
                        square table
                        built into the
                        machine base;
                        with drop-down
                        trunnion receiver
                        with tilting axis
                        center of
                        rotation; capable
                        of handling work
                        loads of up to
                        1,600 kilograms
                        with a precision
                        of within +/-3
                        arc seconds in
                        the tilting and
                        rotary axes for
                        both positioning
                        and machining;
                        having a
                        horizontal-
                        spindle with a Y-
                        axis travel of
                        1,000 mm, an X-
                        axis travel of
                        1,200 mm, and a Z-
                        axis travel of
                        1,050 mm
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8457.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                    27, 2007 | By:                                                        | /s/ Xiong                Junhong |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                      |
|                                 | Xiong                JunhongChief                  Executive Officer |

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1906 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children’s footwear. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 26, 2009 

Mr. ROBERTS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain children’s 

footwear. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CHILDREN’S FOOTWEAR. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Other footwear with outer 

soles and uppers of rubber or 

plastics, for persons other 

than men or women, other 

than house slippers, tennis 

shoes, basketball shoes, gym 

shoes, training shoes and the 

like (provided for in subheading 6402.99.31) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1906 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 26, 2022

NO. 03

- 20

- 00099

- CR

Justin Edward Panus , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the trial court ’ s order denying postconviction forensic DNA testing.

Having revie wed the record and the par ties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s order

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order

denying post conviction for ensic DNA testing. Because appe llant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
 
HEARST-ARGYLE STATIONS, INC.
WAPT HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
KITV HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
KHBS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
KMBC HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
WBAL HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
WCVB HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
WISN HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
WTAE HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
OHIO/OKLAHOMA HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
JACKSON HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
HAWAII HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
ARKANSAS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
KELLY ACQUISITION CORP.
HEARST-ARGYLE SPORTS, INC.
HEARST-ARGYLE PROPERTIES, INC.
DES MOINES HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
ORLANDO HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
NEW ORLEANS HEARST-ARGYLE TELEVISION, INC.
A 3i Infotech Company
 Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria
 1.
    
    Pursuant to Subpart 229.1100  Asset Backed Securities, 17 C.F.R. §§229.1100-229.1123 (Regulation AB), Regulus Group LLC, for itself and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (individually and collectively
Regulus), is responsible for assessing
its compliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the remittance processing services it
provides to customers who are issuers or servicers of asset backed securities
transactions and who have requested confirmation of Regulus compliance in connection with loan
and/or receivables portfolios that include pool assets for asset backed securities
transactions (the Platform). Remittance processing is a service whereby check
payments that are remitted by mail to a post office box are collected, processed through a
highly automated data capture system, and prepared for deposit to a bank account held by
the beneficiary of the payment.2.
    
    The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB were used in
Regulus assessment of compliance. Regulus has concluded that the servicing criteria set forth in
Items 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) of Regulation AB are applicable to the servicing
activities it performs with respect to the Platform (such criteria the Applicable
Servicing Criteria). Regulus has concluded that the remainder of the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect
to the Platform because Regulus does not participate in the servicing activities referenced by such servicing criteria.3.
    
    As of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, Regulus has complied in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of
Regulation AB.4.
    
    KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on
Regulus assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009. A copy of that attestation report is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
 /s/ Kathleen HamburgerKathleen HamburgerChief Executive Officer and President
# L_2008109DE.01004101.xml

| 19.4.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 109/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 109/41

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1177/2006 der Kommission vom 1. August 2006 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 2160/2003 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Bestimmungen über die Anwendung von spezifischen Bekämpfungsmethoden im Rahmen der nationalen Programme zur Bekämpfung von Salmonellen bei Geflügel

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 2. August 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 212 vom 2. August 2006

Seite 5, Artikel 2 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   Die Verwendung antimikrobieller Mittel ... ist so weit wie möglich auf bakteriologische Probenahme und Anfälligkeitstests zu stützen.“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Die Verwendung antimikrobieller Mittel ... ist so weit wie möglich auf bakteriologische Probenahme und Empfindlichkeitstests zu stützen.“

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Angel Ruiz, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered March 22, 1990, which set aside a jury verdict convicting defendant of one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1], [12]) and dismissed the indictment, unanimously reversed, on the law, the verdict reinstated and the case remanded for sentence.

*272The facts of the case are simply stated. On October 24, 1989 around 2:15 p.m. two police officers were sitting in an unmarked rented police car on Avenue B between 12th and 13th Streets in Manhattan. At one point Detective Jacobs, one of the men sitting in the car, saw defendant conversing with three men across the street from the unmarked car. Thereafter defendant pointed to the car in which the officers were seated. The defendant approached the rented car, looked inside and then walked away, entering a store on East 13th Street.

An undercover police officer passed the store. As he did so, a co-defendant, Montemarano, yelled out "Bulldog,” a street name for narcotics. The undercover officer asked for "two”. The undercover was directed into the store where defendant was seated behind a plexiglass counter. The co-defendant went behind the counter and produced two glassine envelopes of heroin and gave them to the undercover in return for twenty dollars. Defendant then told Montemarano, "You know, let’s close up for a little while. He is the last one. Getting too hot.” The co-defendant replied, "Okay, Angel.”

Shortly thereafter both defendant and the co-defendant were arrested. In the store the police found 88 glassine envelopes, 53 of them containing heroin and 35 containing cocaine. In addition $1,580 were found.

Both at the end of the People’s case and at the end of the entire case, the court denied motions to dismiss on the grounds that the People had failed to prove the charges or any lesser included charge. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, the court immediately set the verdict aside on the grounds that the conviction was based on "insufficient evidence” and the evidence was "inadequate as a matter of law.”

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt of the charges and that the verdict is supported by the weight of the evidence. *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987].) Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Ross and Smith, JJ.