alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10wxaayx2y



 





Exhibit 10(aa)(2)




February 10, 2006




Mr. Greg Slack

13858 Freeport Road

San Diego, CA 92129




Re: Employment at Ashworth, Inc.




Dear Mr. Slack:



In accordance with our recent discussions, we are pleased to confirm our offer to you of a
promotion with Ashworth, Inc. (the “Company”) upon the following terms and conditions:





	1.	 	Position; Reporting; Commencement. The position title shall be Corporate Controller
and you shall initially report to Randy Herrel in his position of Chairman/CEO, effective
February 7, 2006. You will be required to observe the Company’s personnel and business
policies and procedures. In the event of any conflict, the terms of this letter will control.







	2.	 	Base Salary; Reviews. You will receive a bi-weekly salary of $5,384.62, less
applicable withholding and deductions, which is payable every other Friday.







	3.	 	Bonus: You have an opportunity to receive a 25% bonus ($35,000) of your annual
salary if the Company meets the plan. In order to be eligible for the bonus program you must
be employed with Ashworth Inc. through the end of each fiscal year.







	4.	 	Retention Bonus: You will receive two guaranteed payments of a retention bonus as
follows. The first payment, equal to six months salary (net pay of $70,000), shall be made
after the 3rd quarter 10-Q is filed, (September 11, 2006). In order to be eligible
for the first payment you must be employed with Ashworth Inc. through September 11, 2006.
Should Ashworth terminate your employment for reasons other than cause, on or prior to
September 11, 2006 you will receive the retention bonus as described for September 11, 2006.
In addition, you will receive a second retention payment of $14,500 (net pay) to be paid on
June 30, 2007.







	5.	 	Savings Plan/Insurance Benefits. Your savings plan will remain the same. In
addition to your existing insurance benefits you will be eligible for Ashworth’s Exec-U-Care
health benefits







	6.	 	Business Expenses, Mileage Reimbursement and Clothing Allowance. You will receive
reimbursement for normal, ordinary and reasonable business expenses upon your submission of
receipts substantiating the expenses claimed in accordance with Company policy. As part of
reasonable expenses, you will be
entitled to reimbursement for business usage of your personal automobile. You will receive a
Clothing Allowance in accordance with Company policy of $100.00 per month.





If you are in agreement with the terms of this letter, please sign and return one copy of the
enclosed letter to the Human Resource Department to effect the commencement of your employment.




Sincerely,




	 	 	 
	/s/Randall L. Herrel, Sr.
	 	 
	 

Randall L. Herrel, Sr.

	 	 
	Chairman, President and CEO
	 	 






ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO THIS

10 DAY OF February 2006




	 	 	 
	/s/Greg Slack
 

Greg Slack
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2264 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies for measuring 

equipment for telecommunication. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain subassemblies 

for measuring equipment for telecommunication. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SUBASSEMBLIES FOR MEASURING 

4 EQUIPMENT FOR TELECOMMUNICATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2264 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Subassemblies containing one 

or more printed circuit assemblies for instruments and 

apparatus for measuring or 

checking electrical quantities, 

specially designed for telecommunications (provided for 

in subheading 9030.90.88) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to such officer’s knowledge
that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





November 12,
      2009
            
            /s/
      Katherine A.
      OstruszkaKatherine
      A. OstruszkaChief
      Financial Officer & Controller
              (Principal
      Financial Officer)
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Faith Lam, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of China Health Care
      Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of China Health Care Corporation.                                                                   

Dated: February 17, 2009

| | /s/ Faith Lam                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Faith Lam                                                                                        
| | Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim
      Chief Financial Officer                        
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
| | China Health Care Corporation                                                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Health
Care Corporation and will be retained by China Health Care Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section

As Adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, John C. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of i2 Telecom International, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §§78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: October 13, 2005



By:

/s/ John C. WilsonJohn C. WilsonChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dynamic Health Products, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cani I. Shuman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Cani I. Shuman     
|Cani I. Shuman         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 27, 2007
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-3065

_____________________________

GREGORY SAPP,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Ronald W. Flury, Judge.

July 11, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROWE and LONG, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Ross Scott Haine, II, 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Layton Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0261

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.D.L.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 8, 2021 within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2021

09/02/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0261
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000812 13-MAY-2014 10:05 AM

SCWC-12-0000812 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ' I

IN THE INTEREST OF V.G.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000812; FC-J NO. 0089867) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on March 29, 2014, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ' i, May 13, 2014. Harrison L. Kiehm, for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
#### In the Matter of Deon L., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Nassau County (De Maro, J.), entered November 7,1988, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated September 27, 1988, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of petit larceny, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated September 27, 1988.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find no merit to the appellant’s claim, raised for the first *470time on appeal, that the Family Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction of the proceeding because the presentment agency failed to present evidence that he was less than 16 years of age when he committed the acts alleged in the petition *(see, Matter of Anthony J.,*143 AD2d 668).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see, Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793), we find that it was legally sufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of petit larceny *(see,*Penal Law § 155.25), criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree *(see,*Penal Law § 165.40), and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree *(see,*Penal Law § 165.05 [1]). The accomplice testimony herein was sufficiently corroborated by independent evidence tending to connect the appellant with the commission of the crimes *(see, People v Hudson,*51 NY2d 233; *People v Daniels,*37 NY2d 624). Sullivan, J. P., Fiber, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.4


 


Better World Acquisition Corp.


733 Third Avenue, 18th Floor


New York, New York 10017


 


November 12, 2020


 


NGEN MGT II, LLC


733 Third Avenue, 18th Floor


New York, New York 10017


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This letter will confirm
our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (the “Effective Date”) of the registration statement
(the “Registration Statement”) for the initial public offering (the “IPO”)
of Better World Acquisition Corp’s (the “Company”) securities and continuing until the earlier
of (i) the consummation by the Company of an initial business combination or (ii) the Company’s liquidation (in each case
as described in the Registration Statement) (such earlier date hereinafter referred to as the “Termination Date”),
NGEN MGT II, LLC shall make available to the Company certain office space, utilities and secretarial support as may be required
by the Company from time to time, situated at 733 Third Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10017 (or any successor
location). In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay NGEN MGT II, LLC the sum of $10,000 per month on the Effective Date and
continuing monthly thereafter until the Termination Date. NGEN MGT II, LLC hereby agrees that it does not have any right, title,
interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies that may be set aside in a trust account (the “Trust Account”)
to be established upon the consummation of the IPO (the “Claim”) and hereby waives any Claim it may have
in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts or agreements with the Company and will not seek recourse
against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






     


     


    

 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	Better World ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Rosemary L. Ripley
	 	 	Name: 	 Rosemary L. Ripley
	 	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer 


 


	AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:
	 
	NGEN MGT II, LLC
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Rosemary L. Ripley	 
	 	Name: 	Rosemary L. Ripley	 
	 	Title:	Authorized Person	 


 


[Signature Page to Administrative Services
Agreement]
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2181 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2181

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
                         with diethenylbenzene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
                         with diethenylbenzene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-PROPENOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH DIETHENYLBENZENE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.02.95 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Propenoic acid, polymer 
with diethenylbenzene) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 16, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-331

Lower Tribunal Nos. 13-10056 SP & 20-279 AP

________________

United Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellant,

vs.

Millennium Radiology, LLC d/b/a

Millennium Open MRI, a/a/o William Thonday,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Ayana 

Harris, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand, for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A., and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines); Marks 

& Fleischer, P.A., and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Appellant United Automobile Insurance Company, an insurer, 

challenges a final summary judgment in favor of Millennium Radiology, LLC, 

a medical provider and assignee of the insured, William Thonday, in a firstparty personal injury protection action. 

Below, United Auto disputed the reasonableness of Millennium 

Radiology’s charge for an MRI procedure. The trial court granted summary 

judgment to Millennium Radiology on the basis of collateral estoppel, finding 

that in a prior PIP lawsuit between the parties, a jury had made the 

determination that the amount charged for the MRI procedure was 

reasonable. On appeal, United Auto argues that the parties in the respective 

lawsuits are not identical because Millennium Radiology received 

assignment from different insureds, and thus, the “identity” element of the 

collateral estoppel doctrine is not satisfied.

We recently decided this issue in United Automobile Insurance Co. v.

Millennium Radiology, 47 Fla. L. Weekly D175, 2022 WL 107604 at *3 (Fla. 

3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022), where we held that Millennium Radiology’s identity 

is not the same from case to case, as it draws its identity from the insured, 

its assignor. We recognize that the trial court did not have the benefit of this 

opinion at the time it entered judgment in the instant case; nevertheless, we 
3

reverse the final summary judgment because the identity of the parties did 

not exist to warrant the application of collateral estoppel.

Reversed and remanded.
|   | (1) | The                report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                                 |                            |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Dated:              May 15, 2007 | By:                                                                        | /s/              Craig Hodgkins |
|                             | Craig                Hodgkins                                                        |
|                             | President                and Director (Principal                  Executive Officer) |

----
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2082 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made fibers 

assembled as floral sprays. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as floral sprays. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS 

4 ASSEMBLED AS FLORAL SPRAYS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Artificial flowers of manmade fibers assembled as floral sprays (provided for in 

subheading 6702.90.35) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2082 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS