alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
0.000

0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400

2b

- 5 Class 6

- 7 Class 8**B r** **a k** **e L** **i m** **i t** **- B** **r a** **k i** **n g** **W o** **r k** **i /** **T r** **a c** **t i** **v e** **W o** **r k**  Brake Limit Using GEM Results

Brake Limit using Method I Originally Proposed

Brake Limit using Method Cummins Proposedy = 0.00042x + 0.22468 R2 = 0.90841

y = 0.00027x + 0.23940 R2 = 0.80818

y = 0.00041x + 0.19158 R2 = 0.82992

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200 0.250 0.300 0.350 0.400

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400**B r** **a k** **e L** **i m** **i t** **- B** **r a** **k i** **n g** **E n** **e r** **g y** **/ T** **r a** **c t** **i o** **n E** **n e** **r g** **y**

**System Rated Power (kW)** Brake Limit Using GEM Results

Brake Limit using Method I Originally Proposed

Brake Limit using Method Cummins Proposed

Linear (Brake Limit Using GEM Results)

Linear (Brake Limit using Method I Originally Proposed) Linear (Brake Limit using Method Cummins Proposed)**Class Rated**  **Power (kW)**  **Cycle Miles**  **W(-) W(+)**  **W(-) / W(+)**  **"A" Veh (GEM)**

**(g/ton-mile) "B" Veh** 

**(g/ton-mile)**

Tran 2.84 0.93 2.58 0.359 421.5 270.3 55 4.58 0 5.33 0 319.6 319.6 65 5.41 0 8.18 0 411.6 411.6 Tran 2.84 1.53 3.71 0.411 269.9 159.1 55 4.58 0 6.08 0 186.5 186.5 65 5.41 0 9.06 0 239.3 239.3 Tran 2.84 2.60 5.97 0.436 300.1 169.3 55 4.58 0 8.54 0 162.7 162.7 65 5.41 0 12.49 0 196.3 196.3 **Class 8** 149

201

339 **2b-5**

**Class 6-7 Weighting** 

**Factors "A" Veh** 

**weighted (GEM) (g/ton-mile)**  **"B" Veh**

**weighted (g/ton-mile)**  **W(-)**

**Weighted W(+)** 

**Weighted Brake Limit** 

**Using GEM Results**  **Brake Limit**

**using Method I**  **Originally Proposed**  0.75 316.1 202.7 0.245 0.682 0.09 28.8 28.8 0 0.105 0.16 65.8 65.8 0 0.242 0.75 202.5 119.3 0.403 0.981 0.09 16.8 16.8 0 0.119 0.16 38.3 38.3 0 0.268 0.75 225.1 127.0 0.687 1.576 0.09 14.6 14.6 0 0.168 0.16 31.4 31.4 0 0.369 0.362 0.327 0.276 0.269

0.323 0.308**Brake Limit**

**using Method Cummins**  **Proposed**

0.325 0.238

0.294
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keewatin Windpower Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 11, 2007


/s/ Chris Craddock
------------------------------------
Chris Craddock
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
p120572.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0572

Focus Ready Draft 10/15/2012

ENGINEER: Macek \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

No information provided.

 

 

 

 

 

 

SAT (concerns) (10/05/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Rapid

PBT rating: P1B1T2

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 11 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

Page 1
p120572.eng

 

 

 

 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0572

Number of Sites/ Location: 

 Days/yr: 22

 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Air or Incineration or Landfill

Output 2: 2.3E-1 kg/site-day over 22 days/yr from 1 site

or 5.1E+0 kg/yr

 

Page 2
p120572.eng

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Output 2: 2.1E+0 kg/site-day over 5 days/yr from 1 site

or 1.0E+1 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

1.5E+1 kg/yr - all sites

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10365

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

IGNACIO ENRIQUEZ-BLANCO; ROGELIO ALVELAIS,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CR-221-7-X

- - - - - - - - - -

November 3, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Ignacio Enriquez-Blanco on

appeal has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Enriquez has filed no response to this brief. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
### SCWC-30286
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

GARY W. RODRIGUES, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. UNITED PUBLIC WORKERS, AFSCME LOCAL 646, AFL-CIO,

Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30286; CIV. NO. 08-1-2538)

ORDER ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C
. J
. , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J
. )



### The application for writ of certiorari filed on April 25, 2014 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Gary W. Rodrigues (“Rodrigues”) is hereby accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

Within 14 days from the date of this order, each party may file a brief not to exceed 10 pages in length, addressing Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30286 09-JUN-2014 01:28 PM

### solely the issue of whether Rodrigues’s indemnification claim is

preempted by ERISA.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, June 9, 2014.

Eric A. Seitz, Della A. Belatti for petitioner James E.T. Koshiba, Charles A. Price for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 8 (Friday, January 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 2397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00461]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9007-1]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 12/31/2012 Through 01/04/2013
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept 
paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or 
after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA.
    While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies 
to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not 
change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and 
comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with EPA's 
electronic reporting site--https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp.

Draft EISs

    EIS No. 20130001, Draft Supplement, BLM, AK, Hardrock Mineral 
Leasing in the White Mountains National Recreation Area, Supplement to 
the Eastern Interior Draft Resource Management Plan, AK, Comment Period 
Ends: 04/11/2013, Contact: Jeanie Cole 907-474-2340.
    EIS No. 20130002, Draft EIS, BIA, CA, Shu'Luuk Wind Project, Campo 
Indian Reservation, Lease Approval, San Diego County, CA, Comment 
Period Ends: 02/25/2013, Contact: Lenore Lamb 951-276-6625 ext. 254.

    Dated: January 8, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-00461 Filed 1-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-3 No. 333-24083 andForm S-8 No. 333-38929, 333-49787 and 333-103453) of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. of ourreport dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules ofMeadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Exhibit 32.1

                               CERTIFICATE OF
                          CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                     AND
                      ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                     OF
                               RAVEN GOLD CORP.

I, Mike Wood, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
of Raven Gold Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended July 31, 2009 (the "Report"):

  a. complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  b. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition of the Company at July 31, 2009, and
     the results of the Company's operations for the quarter ended
     July 31, 2009.

Date:  September 21, 2009

                                  /s/ Mike Wood
                                  ----------------------------------
                                      Mike Wood
                                      Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Acting Chief Financial Officer

<PAGE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6**  **712**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHELDON MOORE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00048

- RBS

- TEM

- 3 )

Submitted : July 26, 2012 Decided: August 2, 2012

Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Sheldon Moore , Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick , Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Sheldon Moore appeals the district c ourt ’ s order s denying his “Motion to Compel Government to Honor Agreement and for Evidentiary Hearing on this Matter” and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons sta ted by the district court. United States v. Moore , No. 4:07

- cr 00048

- RBS

- TEM

- 3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 16, 2012 & Apr. 6, 2012) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2043 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-amino-1,2-propanediol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. MENENDEZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 3-amino-1,2-propanediol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-AMINO-1,2-PROPANEDIOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 3-Amino-1,2-propanediol 

(CAS No. 616–30–8) (provided for in subheading 

2922.19.95) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2043 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Peter Toscano, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1.This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    May 21, 2007      /s/Peter ToscanoPeter Toscano(Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors )
(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6251

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BENJAMIN ROBERT DAVIS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00311

- BO

- 1 ; 5:15

- cv - 00014

- BO )

Submitted : May 31, 2018 Decided: June 21, 2018

Before MO TZ and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr. , Winston

- Salem, North Carolina; Keith Alan Williams , KEITH A. WILLIAMS, PA , Greenville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Robert Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion s . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of World Air Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Michael W. Towe Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.



/s/ Michael W. ToweMichael W. Towe Chief Financial Officer of World Air Holdings, Inc.


July 3, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification    of CEO and CFO Pursuant to****18 U.S.C. Section 1350,****as Adopted Pursuant to** **Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of APAC Customer Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for    the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), Robert J. Keller, as Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, and George H. Hepburn III, as Chief    Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,    pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant    to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to    his knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company. /s/  Robert    J. Keller    Name: Robert J. Keller
# L_2012249EN.01001501.xml

| 14.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 249/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 249/15

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 347 of 11 December 2006
  )

On page 20:

for:

‘TITLE VII

TAXABLE AMOUNT

CHAPTER 4

IMPORTATION OF GOODS’,

read:

‘TITLE VII

TAXABLE AMOUNT

CHAPTER 1

Definition’.

---
EXHIBIT 13.2



ex131002.gif





Unit 1  15782 Marine Drive, White Rock, B.C. V4B 1E6 Canada

Tel: (604) 536-2711  |  Fax: (604) 536-2788





Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Robert Scott, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: April 19, 2006





signed  Robert Scott

______________________________________________

Robert Scott, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Herbert DAVIS v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 87-C-0313.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

March 13, 1987.

In re Davis, Herbert; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 85-CA-0773; Parish of Lafourche, 17th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 48-741.

Denied.
Exhibit 21.1
 APAC CUSTOMER SERVICES, INC.
PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 1
    
    100% ownership by APAC Customer Services, Inc.2
    
    40% owned by APAC Customer Services, Inc., and 60% owned by certain
individual partners of Philippine counsel from Angara Abello Concepcion Regala & Cruz
Law Offices (ACCRALAW®)APAC Customer Services General Partner, Inc. (FEIN 36-4198932) was merged into APAC Customer
Services, Inc. effective May 25, 2008.APAC Customer Services of Illinois, Inc. (FEIN 36-4082216) was merged into APAC Customer
Services, Inc. effective May 25, 2008.ITI Holdings, LLC (FEIN 47-0791858) was cancelled effective May 25, 2008.APAC Customer Services of Texas, LP (FEIN 36-4199020) was cancelled effective May 25, 2008.APAC Customer Services, L.L.C. (FEIN 90-0294088) was cancelled effective May 23, 2008.3
    
    100% ownership by APAC Customer Services, Inc., formed July 9, 2009.4
    
    100% ownership by APAC Latin America, LLC.