2120 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2012 / Notices 

determined by USTR to be confidential 

in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that 

information or advice may qualify as 

such, the submitter— 

(1) Must clearly so designate the 

information or advice; 

(2) Must clearly mark the material as 

‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the 

top and bottom of the cover page and 

each succeeding page; and 

(3) Must provide a non-confidential 

summary of the information or advice. 

Any comment containing confidential 

information must be submitted by fax to 

Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A 

non-confidential summary of the 

confidential information must be 

submitted to www.regulations.gov. The 

non-confidential summary will be 

placed in the docket and open to public 

inspection. 

Pursuant to section 127(e) of the 

URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR will 

maintain a docket on this dispute 

settlement proceeding accessible to the 

public. The public file will include nonconfidential comments received by 

USTR from the public with respect to 

the dispute. If a dispute settlement 

panel is convened or in the event of an 

appeal from such a panel, the U.S. 

submissions, any non-confidential 

submissions, or non-confidential 

summaries of submissions, received 

from other participants in the dispute, 

will be made available to the public on 

USTR’s Web site at www.ustr.gov, and 

the report of the panel, and, if 

applicable, the report of the Appellate 

Body, will be available on the Web site 

of the World Trade Organization, 

www.wto.org. Comments open to public 

inspection may be viewed on the 

www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Bradford Ward, 

Acting Assistant United States Trade 

Representative for Monitoring and 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2012–606 Filed 1–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2012–02] 

Petition for Exemption; Summary of 

Petition Received 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption 

received. 

SUMMARY: This notice contains a 

summary of a petition seeking relief 

from specified requirements of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

The purpose of this notice is to improve 

the public’s awareness of, and 

participation in, this aspect of the FAA’s 

regulatory activities. Neither publication 

of this notice nor the inclusion or 

omission of information in the summary 

is intended to affect the legal status of 

the petition or its final disposition. 

DATES: Comments on this petition must 

identify the petition docket number and 

must be received on or before February 

2, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments 

identified by docket number FAA– 

2011–1240 using any of the following 

methods: 

• Government-wide rulemaking Web 

site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov 

and follow the instructions for sending 

your comments digitally. 

• Mail: Send comments to the Docket 

Management Facility; U.S. Department 

of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 

20590. 

• Fax: Fax comments to the Docket 

Management Facility at (202) 493–2251. 

• Hand Delivery: Bring comments to 

the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Privacy: We will post all comments 

we receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. 

Using the search function of our docket 

Web site, anyone can find and read the 

comments received into any of our 

dockets, including the name of the 

individual sending the comment (or 

signing the comment for an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). You may 

review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act 

Statement in the Federal Register 

published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 

19477–78). 

Docket: To read background 

documents or comments received, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov at any time 

or to the Docket Management Facility in 

Room W12–140 of the West Building 

Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Forseth, ANM–113, (425) 227– 

2796, Federal Aviation Administration, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356, or Frances Shaver, (202) 

267–4059, Office of Rulemaking (ARM– 

207), Federal Aviation Administration, 

800 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. This notice is 

published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 9, 

2012. 

Julie Ann Lynch, 

Acting Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

Petition for Exemption 

Docket No.: FAA–2011–1240. 

Petitioner: Embraer S.A. 

Section of 14 CFR Affected: 

§ 25.791(a). 

Description of Relief Sought: Embraer 

S.A. requests an exemption from the 

interior-cabin location requirements for 

no-smoking placard placement on 

Embraer Model EMB–550 airplanes. 

[FR Doc. 2012–611 Filed 1–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Railroad Administration 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

New Orleans Rail Gateway (NORG), 

Jefferson and Orleans Parishes, LA 

AGENCY: Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing this notice to 

advise the public that it will prepare an 

EIS with the Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development (LA 

DOTD) to evaluate environmental and 

related impacts of upgrading the New 

Orleans Rail Gateway (NORG) and 

infrastructure in Jefferson and Orleans 

Parishes, Louisiana (proposed action). 

FRA is also issuing this notice to solicit 

public and agency input into the 

development of the scope of the EIS and 

to advise the public that outreach 

activities conducted by LA DOTD and 

its representatives will be considered in 

preparation of the EIS. FRA is issuing 

this Notice to alert interested parties, to 

provide information on the nature of the 

proposed action, including the purpose 

and need for the proposed action, 

possible alternatives to be considered in 

the preparation of the EIS, potentially 

significant impacts to the natural and 

built environment of those alternatives, 

and to invite public participation in the 

EIS process. 

DATES: Two public scoping meetings 

will be advertised locally and will be 

held from 6 p.m.–7:30 p.m. at the 

following dates and locations. 

• February 7, 2012 at the Xavier 

University of Louisiana, University 

Center, 3rd Floor, Mary and William 

McCaffrey Ballroom B, 4980 Dixon 

Street, New Orleans, LA 70125 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2012 / Notices 2121 

• February 8, 2012 at the Joseph S. 

Yenni Building, Council Chambers, 

1221 Elmwood Park Boulevard, 

Jefferson, LA 70123 

Information on the meeting locations 

is also available on the following Web 

site: http://www.dotd.la.gov/ 

administration/public_info/projects/ 

NORG/. 

Persons requiring special assistance in 

order to participate in these public 

scoping meetings should contact Mr. 

Dean Goodell, Intermodal 

Transportation Manager, Louisiana 

Department of Transportation and 

Development, 1201 Capitol Access 

Road, Room S–515, Baton Rouge, LA 

70802, or by telephone at (225) 379– 

3031, at least five (5) working days prior 

to the public meetings dates. 

To ensure all significant issues are 

identified and considered, the public 

will be invited to comment on the 

proposed action. Comments on the 

scope of the EIS, including the proposed 

action’s purpose and need, the 

alternatives to be considered, the 

impacts to be evaluated, and the 

methodologies to be used in the 

evaluations will be accepted at the 

public scoping meetings. Those 

attending the public scoping meetings 

will be asked to register at the meeting 

location and may comment in written 

form, or orally. Interested parties may 

also provide written comments on the 

scope of the EIS to Mr. Dean Goodell, 

Intermodal Transportation Manager, 

Louisiana Department of Transportation 

and Development, 1201 Capitol Access 

Road, Room S–515, Baton Rouge, LA 

70802, telephone (225) 379–3031. 

Comments will be considered if 

postmarked within ten (10) calendar 

days following the meetings. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Catherine Dobbs, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Federal Railroad 

Administration, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington 20590, 

telephone: (202) 493–6347 or Mr. Dean 

Goodell, Intermodal Transportation 

Manager, Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development, 1201 

Capitol Access Road, Room S–515, 

Baton Rouge, LA 70802, telephone (225) 

379–3031. Information and documents 

regarding the environmental review 

process will be made available through 

the following Web site: http:// 

www.dotd.la.gov/administration/ 

public_info/projects/NORG/. 

Environmental Review Process 

The EIS will be prepared in 

accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the 

Council on Environmental Quality 

(CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA 

and the FRA’s Procedures for 

Considering Environmental Impacts as 

set forth in 64 FR 28545 dated May 26, 

1999 (Environmental Procedures). The 

EIS will also address Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act, 

Section 4(f) of the U.S. Department of 

Transportation Act of 1966 (49 U.S.C. 

303) and other applicable Federal and 

state laws and regulations. 

The study will result in a NEPA 

document that will address broad 

overall issues of concern, including but 

not limited to: 

• Describing the purpose and need for 

the proposed action. 

• Describing the environment likely 

to be affected by the proposed action. 

• Developing evaluation criteria to 

identify alternatives that meet the 

purpose and need of the proposed 

action and those that do not. 

• Identifying the range of reasonable 

alternatives that satisfy the purpose and 

need for the proposed action. 

• Developing the no-build alternative 

to serve as a baseline for comparison. 

• Describing and evaluating the 

potential environmental impacts and 

mitigation associated with the proposed 

alternatives. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FRA 

and the LA DOTD will prepare the EIS 

for the New Orleans Rail Gateway 

Program and infrastructure in Jefferson 

and Orleans Parishes, Louisiana in 

coordination with the New Orleans 

Regional Planning Commission 

(NORPC) and the railroads operating in 

the New Orleans metropolitan area. The 

Class I railroads, which are members of 

the Association of American Railroads 

(AAR), include Burlington Northern 

Santa Fe Railway (BNSF), Canadian 

National (CN), CSX, Kansas City 

Southern Railway (KCS), Norfolk 

Southern Railroad (NS), and Union 

Pacific (UP) railroads, the terminal 

switching railroad, the New Orleans 

Public Belt Railroad (NOPB), and the 

National Railroad Passenger Corporation 

(Amtrak). LA DOTD and these railroads 

are advancing the proposed action as a 

public-private partnership (P3) among 

these entities. 

I. New Orleans Rail Gateway (NORG) 

The NORG is a rail corridor within 

Jefferson and Orleans Parishes, 

beginning on the west bank of the 

Mississippi River near the St. Charles/ 

Jefferson Parish line. From the Parish 

line it proceeds easterly along tracks of 

the UP and BNSF through the Avondale 

Yard at West Bridge Junction (WBJ) and 

crosses the Mississippi River on the 

Huey P. Long Bridge (HPLB), which is 

owned and operated by the New 

Orleans Public Belt Railroad. At the 

base of the HPLB, it traverses East 

Bridge Junction (EBJ) to the Back Belt 

tracks owned and operated by the NS. 

The NORG proceeds along the Back 

Belt, entering the City of New Orleans 

at the 17th Street Canal. It proceeds 

through the City of New Orleans along 

the Back Belt, and connects with CSX 

trackage at Elysian Fields Avenue, and 

continues on CSX trackage crossing the 

Inner Harbor Navigation Canal on the 

Almonaster Bridge, traversing the CSX 

Gentilly Yard and proceeding easterly 

through New Orleans East to its 

terminus near Industrial Parkway. 

II. Study Area 

For the purpose of the EIS, a Study 

Area has been established that includes 

the above described NORG corridor and 

the other existing rail corridors within 

the New Orleans metropolitan area, and 

is of sufficient geographic extent to 

allow for a variety of alternatives to be 

considered and potential impacts to the 

human, natural, and cultural 

environments to be assessed. The Study 

Area encompasses approximately 110 

square miles and is roughly bounded on 

the west by the Jefferson/St. Charles 

Parish line; on the north by I–10 within 

Jefferson Parish then turns north along 

the Jefferson/Orleans Parish line, 

eastward along Filmore Avenue, north 

along Franklin Avenue, northeast near 

Leon C Simon Drive and Lakeshore 

Drive, southeast along Martin Drive, 

southwest along Wales Street, 

southward along Press Drive and then 

continuing eastward along Dwyer Road; 

on the east along Maxent Canal near 

Bayou Sauvage; and on the south 

following the Intracoastal waterway and 

Mississippi River, then crossing the 

Mississippi River at Louisiana Street 

following US 90 to where it meets the 

Jefferson/St. Charles Parish line. 

III. Purpose and Need 

The NORG serves six Class I Railroads 

and three Amtrak passenger rail routes 

and the NOPB railroad links the Port of 

New Orleans, the eighth largest tonnage 

port in the United States, to the national 

rail network. 

The Gateway is a critical link in the 

national freight rail system. It is one of 

five major rail interchange points 

between the eastern and western Class 

I Railroads and also has one of the four 

major Mississippi River rail bridges. It is 

one of only three national rail gateways 

that are both rail interchange hubs and 

major Mississippi River rail crossings. 

Throughout the NORG, trains must 

observe a maximum speed of 20 mph, 

necessitated, in part, by antiquated 

control systems and switches. Flood 

gates at various locations are closed up 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

2122 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2012 / Notices 

to 24 hours prior to and following storm 

events, such as Hurricane Katrina in 

2005, limiting the railroads’ ability to 

transport evacuees and emergency 

supplies. The NORG includes the 

existing Almonaster Avenue Bridge 

across the Inner Harbor Navigation 

Canal (IHNC), an 80 year old structure 

that is subject to frequent breakdowns. 

The electrical and mechanical 

components of the bridge are obsolete 

and are the cause of continual 

maintenance problems. In the closed to 

navigation position, the bridge has 

virtually no vertical clearance for 

marine traffic. 

Due to its existing design and limited 

capacity, the NORG cannot efficiently 

handle current traffic volumes, 

routinely resulting in delays to both rail 

and road traffic. 

The 29-mile NORG handles 

approximately 35 freight trains per day 

with a combined delay of 29.7 hours per 

day for train meets, including 

deceleration and acceleration. Each of 

the 20 at-grade crossings along the 

NORG handles over 20 trains per day. 

Several of these crossings are moderate 

to high volume arterials, carrying 

between 10,000 and 20,000 vehicles 

daily. Average daily delays to vehicles 

and trucks at these crossings are 112.4 

hours and 12.1 hours, respectively. 

The NORG is not able to 

accommodate anticipated future freight 

demand. The U.S. Department of 

Transportation forecasts that import and 

export freight tonnage could double by 

2020 and domestic freight tonnage 

could increase by approximately 60 

percent. Growth of shipping port traffic 

will increase rail traffic in the NORG. 

This results in negative impacts to the 

community and decreased regional 

economic competitiveness. 

The purpose of the proposed action is 

to: 

• Correct physical and operational 

deficiencies to improve rail traffic flow 

to better serve existing and future users 

of the Gateway, 

• Improve the reliability of marine 

traffic passing through the Inner Harbor 

Navigation Canal under the Almonaster 

Avenue Bridge, 

• Improve the safety of rail and 

vehicle operations in the affected area, 

• Reduce vehicle congestion at street 

crossings, 

• Improve emergency evacuation 

conditions, and 

• Improve overall environmental 

quality. 

IV. Previous Studies 

Over the past 35 years, the FRA, the 

LA DOTD, the New Orleans Community 

and the railroads have examined rail 

improvements within the Gateway that 

would reduce delays and improve rail 

service to rail customers in the greater 

New Orleans region. Most recently, the 

LA DOTD, NORPC, and the AAR, 

representing Amtrak and the six Class I 

freight railroads serving New Orleans, 

studied improvements to the New 

Orleans Rail Gateway that would: 

• Improve rail service, 

• Reduce rail impacts on the adjacent 

communities, and 

• Further the economic recovery and 

development of the metropolitan area. 

Studies in 2002, 2004, and 2007 

evaluated potential physical and 

operational improvements to eliminate 

the worst chokepoints and improve 

freight movement. 

The 2007 NORG Infrastructure 

Feasibility Analysis (2007 Study) 

evaluated possible improvements to the 

Back Belt, Front Belt along the 

Mississippi River, and the Middle Belt 

along the Earhart Expressway/I–10 

Corridor. Improvements to the Front 

Belt were determined to be unfeasible 

due to the adjacent development and 

numerous at-grade crossings. Back Belt 

improvements included grade 

separating numerous highway-railroad 

crossings to improve highway traffic 

flow and would provide limited 

additional rail capacity with minimal 

track construction. Middle Belt 

improvements included creating a new 

route between East Bridge Junction and 

East City Junction by linking existing, 

but lightly used rail lines through 

Jefferson and Orleans Parishes. 

Commonly known as the ‘‘Carrolton 

Curve’’, this route was first identified in 

1955 and would reroute trains to the 

Earhart Expressway/I–10 corridor to 

provide additional rail capacity through 

a more industrial part of the City of New 

Orleans. While the Back and Middle 

Belt improvements both improved 

public safety by eliminating or 

separating most highway-rail grade 

crossings, the Middle Belt 

improvements appeared to offer the best 

benefits for both the public and the 

railroads, and would improve 

emergency evacuation procedures by 

eliminating flood-prone highway 

underpasses on I–10 and Airline 

Highway. 

V. Alternatives To Be Considered 

Preliminary alternatives identified 

include a No-Build Alternative and 

various Build Alternatives. The NoBuild Alternative is defined to serve as 

the baseline for comparison of all 

alternatives. The No-Build Alternative 

represents the transportation system 

(highway and rail) as it exists, and as it 

would exist after completion of 

programs or projects currently funded or 

being implemented. The No-Build 

Alternative would draw upon the 

following sources on information: 

• State Transportation Improvement 

Program (STIP) 

• New Orleans Urbanized Area 

Transportation Improvement Program 

(for all travel modes) 

• Freight and passenger rail plans. 

The Build Alternatives would include 

a program of rail and roadway 

infrastructure and operations 

improvements (program of projects) that 

are cost-feasible and satisfy the stated 

purpose and need. Improvements to be 

considered could include, but not be 

limited to, closing or grade-separating 

crossings, reconfiguring or adding 

trackage, upgrading structures 

(including culverts and over/underpass 

structures), improving signal systems, 

and incorporating positive train control 

(PTC) and/or centralized train control 

(CTC). The Build Alternatives would 

include the alternatives evaluated in the 

2007 Study and additional alternatives 

identified during scoping and the 

alternatives development process. 

VI. Possible Effects 

The FRA and LA DOTD will evaluate 

direct, indirect and cumulative changes 

to the social, economic, and physical 

environment—including land use and 

socioeconomic conditions, ecology, 

water resources, historic and 

archaeological resources, visual 

character and aesthetics, contaminated 

and hazardous materials, transportation, 

air quality, noise and vibration. 

Environmental justice will be examined 

for all alternatives, and Limited English 

Proficiency and Title VI requirements 

documented. The evaluation will take 

into account both beneficial and adverse 

affects and identify measures to avoid, 

minimize, and mitigate adverse 

community and environmental impacts. 

The analysis will be undertaken 

consistent with the National 

Environmental Policy Act, Council on 

Environmental Quality regulations 

defined previously, Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act, the 

Endangered Species Act, Clean Air Act, 

Clean Water Act, FRA’s Environmental 

Procedures, LA DOTD guidance, and 

Section 4(f) of the Department of 

Transportation Act of 1966, along with 

other applicable Federal and state 

regulations. 

VII. Scoping Process 

To ensure that the full range of issues 

related to this proposal is addressed and 

all significant issues identified, 

comments and suggestions are invited 

from all interested parties. Comments or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 9 / Friday, January 13, 2012 / Notices 2123 

questions concerning this proposed 

action and the EIS should be directed to 

the LA DOTD at the address above. 

Letters describing the proposed action 

and soliciting comments have been sent 

to the appropriate Federal, State and 

local agencies, Native American tribes 

and to private organizations who have 

previously expressed or who are known 

to have an interest in this proposal. 

Federal agencies with jurisdiction by 

law or special expertise with respect to 

potential environmental issues will be 

requested to act as a Cooperating 

Agency in accordance with 40 CFR 

1501.6. 

LA DOTD will lead the outreach 

activities, beginning with the scoping 

meetings identified under DATES above. 

Public involvement initiatives, including public meetings, newsletters, and 

outreach to engage low-, minority-, and 

other environmentally-disadvantaged 

groups will be held throughout the 

course of this study. Opportunities for 

public participation will be announced 

through mailings, notices, 

advertisements, press releases and a 

project Web site: http://www.dotd.la.

gov/administration/public_info/

projects/NORG/. 

Two public hearings on the Draft EIS 

will be held following its issuance. 

Public notice will be given, in local 

newspapers, of the time and place of the 

meetings and hearings. The Draft EIS 

will be available for public and agency 

review prior to the public hearings. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 10, 

2012. 

Paul Nissenbaum, 

Associate Administrator for Railroad Policy 

and Development, Federal Railroad 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2012–603 Filed 1–12–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration 

Notice of Applications for Modification 

of Special Permit 

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials 

Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration 

(PHMSA), DOT. 

ACTION: List of applications for 

modification of special permits. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

procedures governing the application 

for, and the processing of, special 

permits from the Department of 

Transportation’s Hazardous Material 

Regulations (49 CFR Part 107, Subpart 

B), notice is hereby given that the Office 

of Hazardous Materials Safety has 

received the applications described 

herein. This notice is abbreviated to 

expedite docketing and public notice. 

Because the sections affected, modes of 

transportation, and the nature of 

application have been shown in earlier 

Federal Register publications, they are 

not repeated here. Requests for 

modification of special permits (e.g., to 

provide for additional hazardous 

materials, packaging design changes, 

additional mode of transportation, etc.) 

are described in footnotes to the 

application number. Application 

numbers with the suffix ‘‘M’’ denote a 

modification request. These 

applications have been separated from 

the new application for special permits 

to facilitate processing. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 30, 2012. 

Address Comments to: Record Center, 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Washington, DC, 20590. 

Comments should refer to the 

application number and be submitted in 

triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of 

comments is desired, include a selfaddressed stamped postcard showing 

the special permit number. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Copies of the applications are available 

for inspection in the Records Center, 

East Building, PHH–30, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, or 

at http://regulations.gov. 

This notice of receipt of applications 

for modification of special permit is 

published in accordance with Part 107 

of the Federal hazardous materials 

transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 

49 CFR 1.53(b)). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 6, 

2012. 

Donald Burger, 

Chief, General Approvals and Permits. 

Application 

No. Docket No. Applicant Regulation(s) affected Nature of special permit thereof 

MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMITS 

11215–M ...... ..................... Orbital Sciences Corporation, Mojave, CA.49 CFR Part 172, Subparts C, D; 172.101, 

Special Provision 109.

To modify the special permit to add a Class 9 material. 

11606– ......... ..................... Safety-Kleen Systems, 

Inc., Plano, TX.

49 CFR 173.28(b)(2) ......... To modify the special permit to authorize double 

stacking of pallets used for shipping and to authorize approved third party transporters to transport 

the material authorized in the permit. 

12135–M ...... ..................... Daicel Safety Systems Inc. 

Hyogo Prefecture 671– 

1682.

49 CFR 173.301(h) ...........

173.302 .............................

173.306(d)(3) ....................

To modify the special permit to authorize a new design of non-DOT specification cylinders (pressure 

vessels) for use as components of automobile vehicle safety systems. 

14175–M ...... ..................... The Linde Group, Murray 

Hill, NJ.

49 CFR 180.209 ............... To modify the special permit to authorize additional 

Division 2.2 gases. 

14467–M ...... ..................... Brennar Tank, LLC, Fond 

Du Lac, WI.

49 CFR 178.345–2 ........... To modify the special permit to authorize construction 

of series 400 cargo tanks using certain materials 

not authorized in 178.345(2) as materials of construction and to add additional UNS Designation 

tanks. 

14952–M ...... ..................... Mebrom NV ErtveldeRieme.49 CFR 173.193 ............... To modify the special permit to Belgium to authorize 

an alternative method of retesting qualification. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES