alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2


              AMERICAN EXPRESS RECEIVABLES FINANCING CORPORATION II

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

       American  Express  Receivables   Financing  Corporation  II,  a  Delaware
corporation (the "Company"),  and each of the undersigned officers and directors
of the  Company,  hereby  constitute  and  appoint  John D.  Koslow,  Leslie  R.
Scharfstein  and Stephen P. Norman,  jointly and  severally,  with full power of
substitution and revocation, their true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
for them and on their behalf and in their respective  names,  places and steads,
in any and all  capacities,  to sign,  execute and affix their  respective  seal
thereto and file any of the documents referred to below relating to the American
Express Credit Account Master Trust;  all filings and reports required under the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  including  Current  Reports  on Form 8-K and
Annual Reports on Form 10-K,  including any amendments thereto, on behalf of the
Company, with any regulatory authority,  granting unto said attorneys,  and each
of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite  and  necessary  to be done in and  about  the  premises  in  order to
effectuate  the same as fully to all intents and purposes as they might or could
do if  personally  present,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or any of them,  may  lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney may be executed in counterparts.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, American Express Receivables Financing Corporation II
has caused this Power of  Attorney  to be executed in its name by its  President
and attested by its Secretary,  and the undersigned  officers and directors have
hereunto set their hand as of the 24th day of March, 2004.

                                           AMERICAN EXPRESS
                                           RECEIVABLES FINANCING
                                           CORPORATION II

                                           By: /s/ Leslie R. Scharfstein
                                              --------------------------
                                              Leslie R. Scharfstein
                                              President

ATTEST:

/s/ Michael Kuchs
------------------------------
Michael Kuchs
Secretary




<PAGE>



/s/ Leslie R. Scharfstein
------------------------------
Leslie R. Scharfstein
President
(Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ John D. Koslow
------------------------------
John D. Koslow
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Finance Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)


/s/ Donald J. Puglisi
------------------------------
Donald J. Puglisi
Director




/s/ David L. Yowan
------------------------------
David L. Yowan
Director
# L_2006232EN.01002901.xml

| 25.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 232/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 232/29

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1268/2006

of 24 August 2006

granting no refund for skimmed milk powder in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 582/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds of skimmed milk powder (2), provides for a permanent tender. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 582/2004 of 26 March 2004 opening a standing invitation to tender for export refunds of skimmed milk powder (2), provides for a permanent tender.

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 22 August 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 580/2004 of 26 March 2004 establishing a tender procedure concerning export refunds for certain milk products (3) and following an examination of the tenders submitted in response to the invitation to tender, it is appropriate not to grant any refund for the tendering period ending on 22 August 2006.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 582/2004, for the tendering period ending on 22 August 2006, no refund shall be granted for the product and destinations referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 August 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

1

(2)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 67. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 409/2006 (OJ L 71, 10.3.2006, p. 5).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

3

---
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1854 

To extend the suspension of duty on pymetrozine technical. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2009 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on pymetrozine technical. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYMETROZINE TECHNICAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.30 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 pymetrozine technical) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Luis
F. Saenz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Li3 Energy, Inc. (f/k/a/ NanoDynamics Holdings, Inc.) for the fiscal
quarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Li3 Energy,
Inc.





Date:  November
      16, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Luis F. SaenzName:
      Luis F. SaenzTitle:  
      Chief Executive Officer





A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Li3 Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Li3 Energy, Inc., and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Michael F. BEIRNE, and Lake Otis Clinic, Inc., a nonprofit Alaska Corporation, Appellants/Cross Appellees, v. STATE of Alaska, Appellee/Cross Appellant.

Nos. S-912, S-913.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

July 11, 1986.

Before RABINOWITZ, C.J., and BURKE, MATTHEWS and MOORE, JJ.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED by an evenly divided court.1

Entered by direction of the court at Anchorage, Alaska, this *11th*day of July, 1986.

COMPTON, J., not participating.

1

. Rabinowitz, Chief Justice, and Matthews, Justice, would reverse the superior court’s affirmance of the Department of Health and Social Service’s revocation of appellants’ certificate of need to build Lake Otis Hospital. In their view, appellants demonstrated good cause for their failure to complete the activities authorized by the certificate of need.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No . DA 23 - 0500 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIE VELTKAMP,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 21 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0500
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.5

                               LECSTAR CORPORATION
                               AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS

         Pursuant to Section 8.9 of the Bylaws of LecStar Corporation, a Texas
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Board of Directors of the Corporation, on
February 12, 2001, did vote for, adopt, approve and consent to the following
amendments to the Company's Bylaws:

         Section 2.11 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following sentence:

                  "Any action permitted or required to be taken at a meeting of
                  the shareholders of the Corporation may be taken without a
                  meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent
                  or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken,
                  shall be signed by the holders of a majority of the capital
                  stock of the Corporation entitled to vote with respect to the
                  subject matter thereof, and such written consent shall have
                  the same force and effect as the requisite vote of the
                  shareholders thereon."
Current SAN CLASS B 

Proposed SAN CLASS B
Eligible Professional/Physician Group Size Distribution (2011 claims)

Group Size Number of

Groups (TINs) Eligible

Professionals Number of

Physicians Percent of

Physicians Cumulative

Percentage

100+ 1,190 351,547 273,495 30.2% 30.2%

50-99 1,627 111,183 78,414 8.7% 38.8%

25-49 3,728 126,594 89,309 9.9% 48.7%

20-24 1,892 41,389 28,954 3.2% 51.9%

10-19 8,647 116,274 82,429 9.1% 61.0%

2-9 68,715 241,759 175,602 19.4% 80.4%

1 222,473 222,473 177,894 19.6% 100.0%

Total 308,272 1,211,219 906,097 100.0%
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Rosalyn Mallet, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caribou Coffee Company, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.May 8, 2008              /s/ ROSALYN MALLET   Rosalyn Mallet   President, Chief Operating Officer
October 24, 2013

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief Essential Air Service 

### & Domestic Analysis Division U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave. SE Washington; DC 20590

RE: Order 2013-10-3 Servicing Kalaupapa, Hawaii

Dear Mr. Schlemmer;

On behalfofthe Kalaupapa Lions Club and its members, I would like to express our 100% satisfaction with the service we have been receiving from Makani Kai Air this past year. They are one ofonly a handful ofcompanies that I have dealtwith that actually listen to our concerns and trytheir best to accommodate. Many times they have gone above and beyond normal business protocol to address our special circumstances here in Kalaupapa. They even purchased a liftforthe Kalaupapa airportto assist the patients/passengers with embarking and departingtheir planes. They have metwith this community several times to solicit our input on the scheduling offlights and luggage restrictions. We, ofcourse, are thrilled with the lowerand fairer prices on the flights. We also are pleased with the professional and courtesy staffat Makani Kai Airfrom the reservationistto the pilots and everyone in between. We all have been embraced by them, employees and owners, and fell like they in return are a part ofour 'ohana. We wholeheartedly support reissuing ofthe Essential Air Service contract to Makani Kai Air for servicing Kalauapapa.
Sincerely, Cla·rence "Boogie" Kahilihiwa President Kalaupapa Lions Club
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Marine Growth Ventures, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig
Hodgkins, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.








Date:  May
      1, 2009
                By:
                /s/   Craig
      HodgkinsCraig
      Hodgkins
                  President
      and Director
                  (Principal
      Executive Officer)
# U n i t e d S t a t e s C o u r t o f A pp e a l s For the Eig hth Circu it

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
No . 1 8 -3 0 37

_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Val eri e LeM as ter

ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l Pl a in t i

f f - Ap p el l an t

v

.
Di t ech Fi n an ci al LLC, fo rm erl y k n own as Green Tree Serv i ci ng LLC; Fed eral Nat i o n al M o rt g ag e As s o ci at io n ; Co ns u m er Fi n an ci al Pro t ect i o n Bu reau

l l l l l l ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l Def

en d a n t s - Ap p el l ees

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ap p eal fro m

Un i t ed St at es Di s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e Di s t ri ct o f M i n n es o ta

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Su bm i t t ed : Sep tem

ber 2 5, 2 0 19 Fi l ed : No v em

b er 1 , 2 0 1 9 [Un pu b l is h ed ]

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ Befo re LOKEN, GRUENDER, an d KOBES, Ci rcu it J u d g es

.

_ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _
PER CURIAM

.Val eri e L eM as t er ap p eal s t h e d i s tri ct co u rt ’ s 1 d i s m i s s al o f he r act i o n ag ai n s t

t h e Co n s u m er Fi n an ci al Pro t ect i o n Bu reau (CFPB), t h e Fed eral Nat i o n al M o rt g ag e As s oci at i o n (F a n n ie M ae), an d Di t ech Fi n an ci al
, LLC (Di t ech ). Aft er recei v i n g

n o t i ce o f Di t ech ’ s co m

m en cem en t o f ban kru p t cy p ro ceed i n g s , th i s co u rt s t ay ed t h e ap p eal ex cep t as to L eM as t er’ s cl ai m ag ai n s t t h e CFPB seek i n g t o en fo rce t h e t erm s

o f a co n s en t o rd er.

Aft er carefu l rev i ew, we n o t e t h a t t h e CFPB p res erv ed co n su m ers ’ ab i l i t y to
p u rs u e a p ri vat e cau s e o f act io n

. W e t h u s c o n c l u d e t h e d i st ri ct co u rt d i d n o t err in
ap p ly i n g t h e p ri n ci p l e i n Pu r e Co u n t ry, In c. v. S i gma Ch i Fr a t er n i t

y , 3 1 2 F.3 d 9 5 2, 9 5 8 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 0 2 ), t o t h e fact s o f t h i s cas e. Fu rt h er, we fi n d n o m eri t t o L eM as t er’ s arg u m en t t h at t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt ab u sed i t s d i s cret i on i n d i s m i s s in g t h e CFPB wi t h o ut al l o wi n g h er t o co n du ct req u es t ed d i s co v ery

. S ee La ki n v. Pr u d

en t i a l S ec., In c. , 3 4 8 F.3 d 7 04 , 7 1 3 (8 t h Ci r. 2 0 0 3) (s t an d ard o f rev i ew). W e affi rm t h e d i s m is s al o n ly as
t o t h e CFPB. S

ee 8 t h Ci r. R. 4 7 B. T h e ap p eal rem ai n s s t ay ed as t o Fan n i e M ae an d Di t ech

.

__ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _

1 Th e Ho n o rab l e J o h n R. Tu n h ei m , Ch i ef J u d g e, Un i ted St ate s D i s t ri ct Co u rt fo r t h e Di s t ri ct o f M i n n es o t a, ad o pt i n g t h e rep o rt an d reco m m en dat i o n s o f t h e H o n o rab l e Dav id T. Sch u l t z, Un i ted St at es M ag is t rat e J u d g e fo r t h e Di s t ri ct o f M i n n es o t a.

-2

-
Document

Exhibit 10.27
Summary of Director, Committee and Chairperson Compensation




On November 3, 2020, the Board of Directors of the Company approved cash director fees, committee member fees and chairperson fees to be paid to non-management directors of the Company in fiscal 2021. Director fees, committee fees and chairperson fees are only paid to non-management directors as summarized below: 


Each non-management director will receive a director fee of $15,000 per Board meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $60,000 per year. 


Each non-management director who serves on a committee of the Board of Directors will receive a fee of $1,250 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $5,000 per year. 


Each non-management director who serves as the chairperson of a committee of the Board of Directors shall receive a fee of $625 per committee meeting attended in person or by teleconference, paid quarterly and not to exceed $2,500 per year.