alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2095 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2095

 To amend the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 
         to authorize appropriations through fiscal year 2015.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Ms. Mikulski (for herself and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Great Black Americans Commemoration Act of 2004 
         to authorize appropriations through fiscal year 2015.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2015.

    Section 3(c) of the National Great Black Americans Commemoration 
Act of 2004 is amended by striking ``2009'' and inserting ``2015''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Solely
      in
      connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report of Mosaic Nutraceuticals
      Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
      2006, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Charles Townsend, Chief Executive
      Officer and Principal Financial Officer, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.





November
      14, 2006





/s/ 
      Charles
      Townsend CHARLES
      TOWNSEND PRESIDENT,
      CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND PRINCIPAL
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
EXHIBIT
99.3



WRITTEN STATEMENT

PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Douglas M.
Pasquale, the Chief Executive Officer, of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, hereby certifies that:



(i)    the annual Form 10K of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: March 27, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | 
|                     
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  |
Exhibit 32.2      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     I, Robert Astore, Chief Financial Officer, and Member of the Board of Directors of International Power Group, Ltd. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  1. This amendment to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    February,8 2008      /s/Robert AstoreRobert Astore(Principal Financial Officer and Member of the Board of Directors.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KBS Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned, Stacie K. Yamane, the Chief Financial Officer and Controller of the Registrant, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of her knowledge and belief: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant. 

Date: November 13, 2006
#### Nick’s Produce, Inc., Respondent, v 329 Sunrise Corp., Doing Business as Golden Reef Diner, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the defendant appeals from so much of an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.), entered January 9, 1990, as granted the plaintiff partial summary judgment in the principal sum of $31,376.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the conclusory allegations by the president of the defendant corporation to the effect that some of the invoices submitted by the plaintiff were "undoubtedly fraudulent”, and other similar assertions, were insufficient to defeat the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. Brown, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2310-193]

                    As stated in a letter dated February 24, 2012, in this proceeding by the Director, Division of Hydropower Licensing, the date for filing of motions to intervene and protests, comments, recommendations, preliminary terms and conditions, and preliminary fishway prescriptions, established by the Commission's notice issued on January 19, 2012,[1]                                          for the Drum-Spaulding Hydroelectric Project No. 2310-193, has been extended to July 31, 2012, with response comments due by September 14, 2012. The filing of final                           ( print page 13591)                        license application amendments has been extended to June 18, 2012.                

 Dated: February 29, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             Notice of Application Accepted for Filing, Soliciting Motions to Intervene and Protests, Ready for Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and Preliminary Fishway Prescriptions.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2012-5535 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 35.2

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Amex Card Services Company

American Express Credit Account Master Trust

American Express Issuance Trust

Reporting Period January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Amex Card Services Company (ACSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant
to the Subservicing Agreement (the Agreement) dated as of June 1, 2006, between TRS and ACSC, does hereby certify that:

1.
ACSC performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver
this Certificate.

3. A review of ACSCs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, ACSC has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material
respects under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.

5. Anderson Y. Lee, Kevin L. Thompson, Denise D. Roberts and Beth M. Schaefer
are authorized to rely on this Certification in connection with their Sarbanes-Oxley and Regulation AB Item 1123 Certifications for the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
20thday of March, 2012.



|                           |  |                    
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------
|AMEX CARD SERVICES COMPANY
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Ramon B. Martin
|                           |  | Ramon B. Martin    
|                           |  | President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lavon Richardson, Appellant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered June 3, 1988, convicting him of murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 330.30 (2) to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Kings County, is to file its report with all convenient speed.

It was error for the Supreme Court to summarily deny the *871defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground of juror misconduct without first holding a hearing to make findings of fact essential to the determination thereof *(see,*CPL 330.40 [2] [f]). We find that the allegations presented in the moving papers, which included an attorney’s affirmation, and which we note, in this case, were sufficient to meet the threshold requirement of CPL 330.40 (2) (a) that the moving papers contain "sworn allegations” of fact, did raise an issue as to whether there had been juror misconduct which may have "affected a substantial right of the defendant” (CPL 330.30 [2]). Accordingly, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court to hold a hearing on the issue of whether the purported juror misconduct did occur and, if so, whether it "affected a substantial right of the defendant” (CPL 330.30 [2]).

We pass upon no other issue at this juncture. Brown, J. P., Kooper, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NewPage Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter H. Vogel,Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tomy knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Peter H. Vogel, Jr. |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Peter H. Vogel, Jr.     |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| August 15, 2005         |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2188

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on poly(toluene 
              diisocyanate) dissolved in organic solvents.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on poly(toluene 
              diisocyanate) dissolved in organic solvents.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLY(TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE) DISSOLVED IN ORGANIC SOLVENTS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to poly(toluene diisocyanate) 
dissolved in organic solvents) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Dwayne H., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Schechter, J.), dated September 6, 1989, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court, dated July 5, 1989, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period ending August 4, 1991. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated July 5, 1989.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of menacing, is without merit. The complainant’s testimony revealed that the appellant and three other youths entered a classroom where the complainant had been teaching a class of 7th grade students. After harassing students in the class, the appellant punched the complainant in the chest three times with a closed fist. He then pushed her towards a wall and left the room. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see, Matter of Jamal V., 159*AD2d 507), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of menacing. Moreover, we are satisfied that the fact-finding order was not against the weight of the evidence. We find that the complainant had reason to fear serious physical injury when the appellant repeatedly punched her in the chest *(see, Matter of Ramon M.,*109 AD2d 882).

The appellant also contends that a new fact-finding hearing should be ordered since the presentment agency failed to disclose an operations report constituting *Rosario*material to his attorney prior to the fact-finding hearing. The operations *467report was created by an employee of the Board of Education and was not being used in a law-enforcement capacity. Since the Board of Education is not a law-enforcement agency and the report was filed with it, the report was not in the constructive possession of the presentment agency and was not *Rosario*material *(see, Matter of Jermaine P.,*146 Misc 2d 443; *see also, People v Berkley,*157 AD2d 463). Therefore, the appellant’s claim is without merit.

Since the operations report is not *Rosario*material, the appellant’s remaining contentions regarding the Family Court’s decision to re-open the fact-finding hearing to permit the appellant’s counsel to cross-examine witnesses based on the information in the report, instead of granting the appellant a new hearing, is without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Eiber, JJ., concur.
# L_2008046DE.01005201.xml

| 21.2.2008 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 46/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2008

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 46/52

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1896/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Dezember 2006 zur Einführung eines Europäischen Mahnverfahrens

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 399 vom 30. Dezember 2006
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 399 vom 30. Dezember 2006

Seite 5, Artikel 7 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   In dem Antrag hat der Antragsteller zu erklären, dass er die Angaben nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen gemacht hat, und anerkannt, dass jede vorsätzliche falsche Auskunft angemessene Sanktionen nach dem Recht des Ursprungsmitgliedstaats nach sich ziehen kann.“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   In dem Antrag hat der Antragsteller zu erklären, dass er die Angaben nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen gemacht hat, und anzuerkennen, dass jede vorsätzliche falsche Auskunft angemessene Sanktionen nach dem Recht des Ursprungsmitgliedstaats nach sich ziehen kann.“

Seite 14, Anhang I „Antrag auf Erlass eines Europäischen Zahlungsbefehls“, Formblatt A, Nummer 9 „Kosten (falls zutreffend)“, Text in den vier Zeilen der zweiten Spalte:

anstatt:

„Erläuterungen (gilt nur für Code 03 und 04)“

muss es heißen:

„Erläuterungen (gilt nur für Code 02)“.

---
# Europos Sąjungos C 210A/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 210A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 65 metai2022m. gegužės 25d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 210A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

65 metai2022m. gegužės 25d.

---

| Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2022/C 210 A/01 | Europos žiedinės biožaliavinės ekonomikos bendroji įmonė. Pranešimas apie konkursą vykdomojo direktoriaus pareigoms (AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas). COM/2022/20077 – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 206 A, 2022 5 23 ) | 1 |

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2022/C 210 A/01

Europos žiedinės biožaliavinės ekonomikos bendroji įmonė. Pranešimas apie konkursą vykdomojo direktoriaus pareigoms (AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas). COM/2022/20077 – klaidų ištaisymas ( OL C 206 A, 2022 5 23 )

( OL C 206 A, 2022 5 23 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 2022 5 25 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2022 5 25

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 210/1

---

Europos žiedinės biožaliavinės ekonomikos bendroji įmonė. Pranešimas apie konkursą vykdomojo direktoriaus pareigoms (AD 14 lygio laikinasis darbuotojas). COM/2022/20077 – klaidų ištaisymas

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 206 A, 2022 m. gegužės 23 d.
  )

(2022/C 210 A/01)

5 puslapis, „Galutinis terminas“, pirma pastraipa:

| yra: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. birželio 13 d. 12 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“, |
| --- | --- |

yra:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. birželio 13 d. 12 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“,

| turi būti: | „Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. liepos 4 d. 12.00 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“ |
| --- | --- |

turi būti:

turi būti:

„Galutinis registracijos terminas – 2022 m. liepos 4 d. 12.00 val. Briuselio laiku; vėliau registracija negalima.“

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7766]

      ( print page 14583)    
Notice of Proposal to Extend the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Mali Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Paleolithic Era (Stone Age) to Approximately the Mid-Eighteenth Century.

The Government of the Republic of Mali has informed the Government of the United States of America of its interest in an extension of the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Mali Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from the Paleolithic Era (Stone Age) to Approximately the Mid-Eighteenth Century.

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this Agreement is hereby proposed.

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will be requested.

                    A copy of the Agreement, the Designated List of restricted categories of material, and related information can be found at the following Web site:                     *http://exchanges.state.gov/​heritage/​culprop.html.*

Dated: February 29, 2012.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-5910 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Date:
    November 7, 2008
  
   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer