alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Robert Scott, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Amended Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Asia Pacific Resources Ltd.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Amended Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Amended Annual Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report;



4. The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over  financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process,

summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: April 19, 2006



Robert Scott

By: /s/ "Robert Scott"

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





103
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2050 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3.5-Dinitrobenzotrifluoride: 

Benzene, 2-chloro-1,3-dinitro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. COCHRAN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3.5- 

Dinitrobenzotrifluoride: Benzene, 2-chloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-3.5-DINITROBENZOTRIFLUORIDE: 

4 BENZENE, 2-CHLORO-1,3-DINITRO-5- 

5 (TRIFLUOROMETHYL)-. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2050 IS

‘‘ 9902.01.00 4-Chloro-3.5- 

Dinitrobenzotrifluoride: Benzene, 2-chloro-1,3-dinitro-5- 

(trifluoromethyl)- (CAS No. 

393–75–9) (provided for in 

subheading 2904.90.47) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

August 16, 2024 SC-2024-0430 Ex parte John Kaleb Gillespie PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS (In re: John Kaleb Gillespie v. State of Alabama) (Morgan Circuit Court: CC-19-89; Criminal Appeals: CR-2023-0692). CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on August 16, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Wise, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Sellers, Stewart, and Cook, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2084 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2084

   To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made 
                      fibers assembled as wreaths.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Inhofe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on artificial flowers of man-made 
                      fibers assembled as wreaths.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS OF MAN-MADE FIBERS ASSEMBLED AS WREATHS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Artificial flowers  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        of man-made                                                        31/2011.......
                        fibers assembled
                        as wreaths
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        6702.90.35)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1969 

To extend the suspension of duty on difenoconazole. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on difenoconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIFENOCONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 difenoconazole) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 by inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


IDS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY                               [RIVERSOURCE LOGO(SM)
                                                         ]
     HOME OFFICE:
     227 Ameriprise Financial Center
     Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474

                          COMPANY MERGER ENDORSEMENT

Effective December 31, 2006, American Partners Life Insurance Company merged
into IDS Life Insurance Company. IDS Life Insurance Company is the surviving
company, and is now your insurance company.

The address to which you should communicate with the Company with questions and
premium payments is:

                    [   70100 Ameriprise Financial Center
                         Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474
                              (800) 862-7919   ]

                              [   For Questions:
                      70100 Ameriprise Financial Center
                         Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474
                                (800) 862-7919

                            For Premium Payments:
                      70100 Ameriprise Financial Center
                         Minneapolis, Minnesota 55474
                              (800) 862-7919   ]

Your benefits will not change as a result of the merger. All other provisions
of your policy or contract remain the same.


                                       [      /s/ Thomas R. Moore       ]

                                                 Secretary

IMPORTANT:  This endorsement should be attached to and made a part of your
policy or contract.



131113
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

October 5, 2000 Session

TIP AND BARBARA TERRY v. SCOTT BOTTS

 Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Scott County

No. 8642 Michael A. Davis, Judge

FILED FEBRUARY 22, 2001

No. E2000-01288-COA-R3-CV 

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., concurring.

I concur fully in the majority opinion’s holding that the Scott County Juvenile Court lacked

subject matter jurisdiction to consider the appellees’ petition to establish grandparent visitation. In

view of this holding, I do not believe that it is appropriate to discuss the propriety of the trial court’s

determination – as expressed in the language of the majority opinion – “that a substantial danger of

harm existed as to all three of these children should they be prohibited from visiting with their

grandparents.” In addressing the substance of this finding, the majority opinion seems to tacitly

acknowledge that the statutory definition of “substantial harm to the child” as set forth in T.C.A. §

36-6-306(b)(1)(A)-(C) and as further explained in Subsection (b)(2) of T.C.A. § 36-6-306 is a

constitutionally-valid predicate for the application of the “best interests” test pursuant to the

provisions of T.C.A. § 36-6-307. I have some doubts regarding this conclusion, doubts that are

engendered by my reading of Hawk v. Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and its progeny. In any

event, that question is not before us in this case and I express no firm opinion as to whether these

particular statutory provisions are compatible with the Tennessee Constitution.

___________________________________ 

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
Exhibit 31.2





Certification


Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted


Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








I, Michael A. Bless, certify that:


|   |                                                                                                      
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Century Aluminum Company;

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




By:/s/ Michael A. BlessName:Michael A. BlessTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:April 30, 2014
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5046

_____________________________ C ITY O F M IAMI B EACH and C ORVEL C ORPORATION , Appellant s ,

v.

W ILLIAM G EDDES , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Sylvia Medina

- Shore , Judge

.
Date of Accident: December 12, 2011.

April 13, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , R OBERTS , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Luis F. Estrada of Angones, McClure & Garcia, P.A., Miami
, for Appellant s

. Bill McCabe, Longwood, and Kevin R. Gallagher of The Gallagher Law Group , Fort Lauderdale
, for Appellee.
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2008 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4N-Oxydiphthalic 

anhydride. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on 4,4NOxydiphthalic anhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4,4N-OXYDIPHTHALIC ANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.13 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 4,4N-Oxydiphthalic anhydride) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2008 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
# L_2007043EN.01004202.xml

| 15.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 43/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 43/42

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 2006/8/EC of 23 January 2006 amending, for the purposes of their adaptation to technical progress, Annexes II, III and V to Directive 1999/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 19 of 24 January 2006
  )

On page 19, under the heading: ‘8. Preparations containing substances not yet tested completely’,

Preparations containing substances not yet tested completely

for:

‘... “Caution — substance not yet tested completely”, ...’

read:

‘... “Caution — substance not yet fully tested” ...’

---
(May 28, 1991)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Emanuel Hancock, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leon Becker, J., at jury trial and sentence; Herbert Altman, J., on speedy trial motion), rendered February 11, 1986, convicting defendant of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

This case was held in abeyance pending determination of defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. *(People v Hancock,*161 AD2d 108.) The motion was denied upon the finding that, at most, 130 days of delay were chargeable to the People. We now affirm. Although an additional period of 22 days, between indictment and arraignment, is chargeable to the People as conceded *(People v Correa,*77 NY2d 930), the People nevertheless were well within their statutory time frame. The District Attorney was under no obligation to produce the Grand Jury minutes until ordered to do so, and he was entitled to a reasonable time to get them once the court directed their production. *(People v Wallace,*100 AD2d 634, *appeal dismissed*63 NY2d 1035, *rearg denied*65 NY2d 638.) The contested periods of time due to the complainant’s unavailability were properly excluded, as her extended pregnancy was a special circumstance. (CPL 30.30 [4] [g].) Defendant consented to or waived objection to the remaining periods of delay that he contests on appeal. (CPL 30.30 [4] [b]; *People v Lawrence,*64 NY2d 200, 205.)

*378We find no merit in defendant’s claim that his guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Rosenberger, Kassal and Smith, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shamel Atkins, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (David Stadtmauer, J.), rendered July 8, 1987, convicting defendant after jury trial of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 4 Vi to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant, during an undercover "buy and bust” operation, led the undercover officer to an apartment, summoned the co-defendant, and requested two "jumbo” vials of crack for the officer. While defendant neither handled the money nor the narcotics, there was ample evidence that defendant knew the substance was crack cocaine, and that he intentionally aided the sale by leading the officer to the purchase location and requesting delivery on the officer’s behalf. *(People v Kaplan,*76 NY2d 140, 147.)

As to the claim that facilitation should have been charged as a lesser included offense, it is clear that facilitation is not a lesser included offense of criminal sale of a controlled substance. *(People v Glover,*57 NY2d 61; *People v Luther,*61 NY2d 724; *People v Alexander,*172 AD2d 385.) Nor could facilitation be charged as a lesser included offense of the "acting in concert” allegation of the indictment. *(People v Hernandez,*135 AD2d 732.) "Acting in concert” is not an element of the crime charged, but merely a theory of the case. Moreover, the fact remains that facilitation is simply not a lesser included offense of any crime charged in the indictment which was presented to the jury.

Defendant could not have been prejudiced by the jury *425charge to the effect that if they found defendant was not acting in concert with Ruiz, defendant could not be found guilty. In any event, the court later omitted this statement from its instructions. Nor was it error to charge that a reasonable doubt is a doubt "which seems reasonable to you.” *(People v Malloy,*55 NY2d 296, 300.)

As to the People’s argument that this Court should overrule *People v Kilpatrick*(143 AD2d 1), insofar as it may have suggested that a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence in a criminal case is preserved absent a motion for a trial order of dismissal on this ground at the close of the People’s case, we are unpersuaded that the case was wrongly decided. *(People v Velasquez,*151 AD2d 159, *affd*76 NY2d 905.) [The unpublished decision and order of this court entered on May 23, 1991 is recalled and vacated.] Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


UNION PACIFIC RESOURCES GROUP INC.
Union Pacific Resources Company
Union Pacific International Petroleum Company
Basic Resources International (Bahamas) Limited
Union Pacific Resources (Bahamas) Limited
Union Pacific Resources Argentina S.A.
Union Pacific Resources Venezuela, S.A.
UP Petroleo III Ltd.
Union Pacific Oil and Gas Holding Company
Union Pacific Refining, Inc.
Union Pacific Resources Inc.
Union Pacific Resources Pipeline Company
Golden Spike Gathering, Inc.
Union Pacific Crude Pipeline, Inc.
UPR Energy Marketing, Inc.
UPR Energy Services Inc.
UPR Operating Company
Big Island Trona Company
Bitter Creek Coal Company
Hanna Basin Coal Company
Rock Springs Royalty Company
Union Pacific Realty Company
Upland Industries Corporation
Union Pacific Land Resources Corporation
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2057

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain lamps used in liquid 
                  chromatography or spectrophotometry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain lamps used in liquid 
                  chromatography or spectrophotometry.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAMPS USED IN LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY OR 
              SPECTROPHOTOMETRY.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Ultraviolet lamps   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          filled with                                                        31/2011.......
                          deuterium gas
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8539.49.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```