alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MARVEON SIGN COMPANY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Myrna ROENNEBECK, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 18751.

Supreme Court of Utah.

Dec. 6, 1984.

SCOTT J. DANIELS, District Judge.

The defendant, Myrna Roennebeck, and her husband, Fred Roennebeck, were general partners in a business called Precious Metals of Utah. Plaintiff sued on a written contract to supply an electric sign. The form contract begins with a blank labeled “purchaser.” In the blank is written “Fred Roennebeck, Precious Coins.” Thereafter, the contract recites: “I/We the undersigned, hereinafter called the Purchaser....” The signature line is preceded by the printed word “purchaser” and is signed by defendant Myrna Roennebeck. Under her signature are the printed words “authorized signature.”

Suit was brought solely against Mrs. Ro-ennebeck, alleging personal liability on the contract. Mrs. Roennebeck moved to join the partnership and its other partner, Mr. Roennebeck, as parties. Plaintiff steadfastly maintained that it was not seeking to enforce a joint liability based on the partnership, but rather a personal obligation of Mrs. Roennebeck’s based on her signature on the contract. Accordingly, the trial judge denied the motion to join.

Evidence was admitted to show the intentions of the parties. The very limited evidence available indicated that plaintiff dealt exclusively with Mr. Roennebeck. He ordered the sign, detailed its specifications, and negotiated the price. He then told his wife to sign the contract, and she did. There were no discussions as to whether she was signing as an agent or in her personal capacity.

When a person signs a contract without qualification or indication that she signed as an agent or representative, she is personally liable. In *Anderson v. Gardner,*Utah, 647 P.2d 3 (1982), the Court adopted the rule (which is statutory for negotiable instruments, U.C.A., 1953, § 70A-3-403(2)(a)) that a signer is personally liable “if the instrument neither names the person nor shows that the representative signed in a representative capacity.”

In this case, the contract named the purchaser as “Fred Roennebeck, Precious Coins.” The words “authorized signature” under the signature line imply that Myrna Roennebeck was signing as an agent. Although parol evidence was admitted to show the parties’ intentions, there was no evidence that either party intended Mrs. Roennebeck to be the purchaser of the sign. All the evidence was that he, not she, was intended to be the purchaser. Ac-*605eordingly, she is not personally liable on the contract.

The judgment is reversed. Costs are awarded to the appellant.

HALL, C.J., and HOWE and DURHAM, JJ., concur.

STEWART, J., does not participate herein; SCOTT J. DANIELS, District Judge, sat.

ZIMMERMAN, J., does not participate herein.
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2102 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2102

 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain electric motor controllers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reduce temporarily the duty on certain electric motor controllers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ELECTRIC MOTOR CONTROLLERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.01.00      Electric motor      .81%         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                        controllers                                                        31/2011.......
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        9032.89.60),
                        certified by the
                        importer to
                        control the
                        electric motors
                        that power
                        electric vehicles
                        of subheading
                        8703.90 in which
                        an on board
                        gasoline engine
                        is used to run a
                        generator that
                        recharges the
                        electric drive
                        motor battery....

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1998 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on cerium sulfide pigments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Mr. CHAMBLISS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend temporarily the suspension of duty on cerium 

sulfide pigments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERIUM SULFIDE PIGMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cerium sulfide pigments) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1998 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1




                           ARV Assisted Living, Inc.
                         Computation of Loss Per Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Year Ended March 31,
                                           ---------------------------
                                            1997      1996      1995
                                           -------   -------   -------
                                              (In thousands, except
                                                 per share data)
<S>                                        <C>       <C>       <C>
Loss before extraordinary loss             $(1,388)  $  (965)  $(2,999)
Preferred dividends declared                    --       351       398
                                           -------   -------   -------

Loss before extraordinary loss available 
 to common shareholders                     (1,388)   (1,316)   (3,397)
                                           =======   =======   =======

Loss per common share before
 extraordinary loss                        $ (0.15)  $ (0.21)  $ (0.69)
                                           =======   =======   =======

Extraordinary loss, early extinguishment   
 of debt, net of tax benefit of $231       $  (386)       --        --
                                           =======   =======   =======

Extraordinary loss per common share        $ (0.04)       --        --
                                           =======   =======   =======

Loss per common share                      $ (0.19)  $ (0.21)  $ (0.69)
                                           =======   =======   =======

Weighted average shares outstanding          9,400     6,246     4,903
                                           =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned herebycertify that pursuant to the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), the Annual Reporton Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”)of Hearst-Argyle Television, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that informationcontained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atand for the periods indicated.

Dated: February 26,2007
|        | By:                                                         | /s/ DAVID J.  BARRETT |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   | Name: David J. Barrett                                      |
|   | Title:   *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 
|        | By:                                                                        | /s/ HARRY T.  HAWKS |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Name: Harry T. Hawks                                                       |
|   | Title:   *Executive  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF TRANSPRO, INC.

         The following sets forth a list of all the subsidiaries of TransPro,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and the State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of each.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    NAME                        JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR
                    ----                                  ORGANIZATION
                                                          ------------
<S>                                             <C>
      Allen Heat Transfer Products, Inc.                    Delaware
      AHTP II, Inc.                                         Delaware
      CROWN CREW CAB, INC.                                  Delaware
      GO/DAN Industries, Inc.                               Delaware
      GO/DAN de Mexico, SA de C.V. (1)                       Mexico
      Radiadores GDI, SA de C.V. (1)                         Mexico
      TransPro Indus Ltd.                                   Mauritius
      Crown-VMS Canada, Ltd.                             Ontario, Canada
      EVAP, Incorporated                                      Texas
      A/C Plus, Incorporated                                  Texas
</TABLE>

(1)      A wholly-owned subsidiary of GO/DAN Industries.
The HONORABLE PAUL A. MAGNUSON, Chief Judge, United States

1

District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report

and recommendation of the HONORABLE RAYMOND L. ERICKSON, United

States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________

No. 96-3047

___________

Julius Randolph Blaine Johnson, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

David Johnson; Will Tannehill; *

On-Guard, Inc.; David Fischer; * Appeal from the United States

Mark Magnuson, * District Court for the 

* District of Minnesota.

Appellees, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Minnesota Inn, Inc.; Susan *

Sletten; Steve Otteson; John *

Laux; Don Omodt, *

*

Defendants, *

___________

 Submitted: April 29, 1997

 Filed: May 2, 1997

___________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Julius Randolph Blaine Johnson, a federal prisoner, brought a

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against a security company and four of its

employees, alleging a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights when

two of the employees stopped and searched his person and car in a

motel parking lot. The district court granted summary judgment 1
-2-

in favor of defendants, concluding that Johnson was collaterally

estopped from litigating the issue, based on a determination in a

prior criminal case that the search by these private parties did

not implicate the Fourth Amendment.

After de novo review of the record before the district court,

see Earnest v. Courtney, 64 F.3d 365, 366-67 (8th Cir. 1995) (per

curiam), we conclude that the district court's grant of summary

judgment, based on collateral estoppel, was correct. Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Johnson's motions for

appointment of counsel, and for leave to file an addendum and to

submit documents outside the record. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Reef Global Energy VI, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Michael J. Mauceli, principal executive officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.






Date:  May
      12, 2010
            /s/ Michael J.
      MauceliMichael J. Mauceli
              Manager and Member of Reef Oil & Gas
      Partners,
              GP, LLC, the manager of Reef Oil & Gas
      Partners,
              L.P., the Managing General Partner of the
      Partnership
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of § 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Partnership and will
be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CHARLES BENLOCK *v.*NEW HAVEN TERMINAL/ CILCO TERMINAL ET AL.

*Scott Wilson Williams,*in support of the petition.

*Carolyn P. Kelly,*in opposition.

Decided May 7, 1998

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 250 (AC 17178), is denied.
Exhibit 2.05

                       Dated the 14th day of February 2003



                           ss.o+/-W+/-W(Li Zhengzheng)
                            |P. <<0(Y)-(Zhu Jianping)
                              (3)(1)1/2/(Zhang Hui)
                                 (R)aAl(Sang Yi)
                          A(1)(degree)o+/-O(Dai Peimin)
                            A(1)+/-o(a)U(Luo Meifang)



                                       and



                             HARTCOURT CAPITAL, INC.
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF
                  CERTAIN INTEREST IN THE REGISTRED CAPITAL OF
                        u0(2)M(Y)0o ~uo(R)i|(3)--*1/2(Y)q
                    (HUAQING CORPORATION DEVELOPMENT CO LTD)
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2146 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain AC electric motors 

of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not exceeding 105 W. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 29, 2009 

Mr. ALEXANDER (for himself and Mr. CORKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain AC 

electric motors of an output exceeding 74.6 W but not 

exceeding 105 W. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN AC ELECTRIC MOTORS OF AN OUT4 PUT EXCEEDING 74.6 W BUT NOT EXCEEDING 

5 105 W. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.85.07 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain AC electric motors of an output exceeding 74.6 

9 W but not exceeding 105 W) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2146 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘12/31/2011’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘free’’ and inserting ‘‘1%’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

6 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
TORO VENTURES INC.
FORM 10-Q FOR THE  THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph Arcaro, am the Chief
Executive Officer of Toro Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the  three month period ended    September 30, 2009 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Quarterly Report").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|Date: June 17, 2013                                                                     
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: /s/ Joseph Arcaro
        Joseph Arcaro
        Chief Financial Officer and Director
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 03/03/2011 03:33 PM 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule 

Hi Bob, 

Consistent with our EOs, attached is the handout from this meeting. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 4:29 PM 

To: Echols, Mabel E.; Neyland, Kevin F.; Mancini, Dominic J.; Higgins, 

Cortney; Rackoff, Jonathan E.; Dick, John H.; Clark, Michael C.; Patel, 

Manisha; Levinson, Arik; Keohane, Nathaniel; Zichal, Heather R.; Bloom, 

Ron; jason.miller2@treasury.gov; tsirigotis.peter@epamail.epa.gov; 

wayland.robertj@epamail.epa.gov; culligan.kevin@epa.gov; 

Thundiyil.Karen@epamail.epa.gov; Bertrand.Charlotte@epamail.epa.gov; Lee, 

Amanda I.; Kymn, Christine J. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule 

When: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Wilson Room, WHCC -- Room Correction 

 

 

When: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: Wilson Room, WHCC -- Room Correction 

 

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time 

adjustments. 

 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

  

Linda Stuntz, Stuntz, Davis & Staffier has requested this meeting.
Exhibit 32.2SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION     In connection with the Annual Report of Central Parking Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onDecember 14, 2006 (the “Report”), I, Jeff Heavrin, Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Chelsea Therapeutics International, Ltd. (the Company) for
the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Nick Riehle, Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Nick RiehleJ. Nick RiehleVice President, Administration and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 5, 2009