alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Karen M. SpaunKaren M. SpaunSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2011
# C_2006298EN.01000201.xml

| 8.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 November 2006

replacing a an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work

(2006/C 298/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 3 June 2002 (2) and 29 April 2004 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 2 June 2005; that period has been extended in accordance with Article 1(5) of Regulation No 1112/2005. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 3 June 2002 (2) and 29 April 2004 (3), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 2 June 2005; that period has been extended in accordance with Article 1(5) of Regulation No 1112/2005.

2

3

| (2) | An alternate member's seat in the category of government representatives on that Governing Board has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Bo BARREFELT. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat in the category of government representatives on that Governing Board has fallen vacant following the resignation of Mr Bo BARREFELT.

| (3) | The Swedish Government has submitted a nomination for the vacant seat, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Swedish Government has submitted a nomination for the vacant seat,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Ms Anna-Lena HULTGÅRD SANCINI is hereby appointed an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work in place of Mr Bo BARREFELT for the remainder of the current term of office, which ends upon inauguration of a new Governing Board in accordance with Article 1(5) of Regulation No 1112/2005.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA

---

(1)  OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1643/95 (OJ L 156, 7.7.1995, p. 1) and Regulation (EC) No 1112/2005 (OJ L 184, 15.7.2005, p. 5).

1

(2)  OJ C 161, 5.7.2002, p. 5.

2

(3)  OJ C 116, 30.4.2004, p. 16.

3

---
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 48 (Monday, March 12, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR12-18-000]


Bay Gas Storage, LLC: Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on March 2, 2012, Bay Gas Storage, LLC filed 
pursuant to Section 12.2.4 of its Statement of Operating Conditions to 
revise its Company Use Percentage as more fully described in the 
filing.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6a0a3b4a5a9888a8f8883b5939696899492a680839485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a3a0b7a6aa8b898c8b80b69095958a9791a583809786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 14, 2012.

    Dated: March 5, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5841 Filed 3-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 46 (Thursday, March 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 14025]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5705]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Global Mental Health Hubs.
    Date: April 16, 2012.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Melrose Hotel, 2430 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20037.
    Contact Person: Marina Broitman, Ph.D, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 
6153, MSC 9608, Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-402-8152, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#533e31213c3a273e32133e323a3f7d3d3a3b7d343c25"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ff929d8d90968b929ebf929e9693d1919697d1989089">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 1, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-5705 Filed 3-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and solely to the extent this certification may be applicable to this report, the undersigned hereby certify that this report of Z Yachts, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |                      |                                       |  |  | 
|---------------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------------------- |  |  | 
|                       |                      |                                      
|Dated: August 21, 2006 | /s/ James G. Weller  |                                      
|                       | Name:                | James G. Weller                      
|                       | Title:               | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |                      |                                      
|                       |                      |                                      
|                       | /s/ Regina F. Weller |                                      
|                       | Name:                | Regina F. Weller                     
|                       | Title:               | Chief Financial Officer              
|                       |                      |                                       |  |  | 



1
II 

111TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1994 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reusable fabric bags. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2009 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain reusable fabric 

bags. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN REUSABLE FABRIC BAGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Reusable fabric bags entered 

with at least one article of 

bedding per bag (provided for 

in subheading 6307.90.98) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1994 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IGNACIO CEDILLO BARCENAS;

MARIA DEL CARMEN ESTRADA DE 

CEDILLO,

 Petitioners,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 14-70174

Agency Nos. A073-935-612

A073-935-619

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 24, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Ignacio Cedillo Barcenas and Maria Del Carmen Estrada De Cedillo, natives 

and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ 

(“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 3 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-70174

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s 

denial of a motion to reopen, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 

2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ second motion 

to reopen as untimely and number-barred because the motion was filed over four

years after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners

failed to establish materially changed circumstances in Mexico to qualify for the 

regulatory exception to the time limitations for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 

1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir.2010) (evidence 

lacked materiality because it simply recounted “generalized conditions” in country 

that did not show petitioner’s situation was “appreciably different from the dangers 

faced by her fellow citizens”). Further, we reject petitioners’ contentions that the 

BIA failed to consider arguments or record evidence, see Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 

990-91 (BIA adequately considered evidence and sufficiently announced its 

decision). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
*********************************************** 

The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was 

released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions 

and petitions for certification is the “officially released” 

date appearing in the opinion. 

All opinions are subject to modification and technical 

correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut 

Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of 

discrepancies between the advance release version of an 

opinion and the latest version appearing in the Connecticut 

Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports 

or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest version is to 

be considered authoritative. 

The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the 

opinion as it appears in the Connecticut Law Journal and 

bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the 

Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not 

be reproduced and distributed without the express written 

permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. 

*********************************************** 
STATE v. JONES—CONCURRENCE

PALMER, J., concurring. I fully agree with the majority opinion. I write separately only to note my belief

that, for the reasons previously expressed in State v.

Diaz, 302 Conn. 93, 115, 25 A.3d 594 (2011) (Palmer,

J., concurring), a special credibility instruction should

be given whenever a government informer seeks a benefit from the state in return for his or her testimony. See

id., 121–22 (Palmer, J., concurring) (‘‘Because informers seeking a benefit from the state have a strong motive

to falsely inculpate the accused . . . I agree with those

courts that require a special credibility instruction

whenever a government informer hopes or expects to

receive a benefit from the prosecution. As the Second

Circuit Court of Appeals has stated, ‘a defendant who

makes [a request for a special credibility instruction]

is entitled to a charge that identifies the circumstances

that may make one or another of the government’s

witnesses particularly vulnerable to the prosecution’s

power and influence . . . and that specifies the ways

(by catalog or example) that a person so situated might

be particularly advantaged by promoting the prosecution’s case.’ United States v. Prawl, 168 F.3d 622, 628

(2d Cir. 1999). In other words, the defendant is entitled

to a charge that ‘invite[s] focus on individual predicaments of the witnesses’ and contains ‘mention [of] the

incentives that follow from certain transactions with

the government.’ Id., 628–29 . . . .’’ (Citations omitted;

footnote omitted.)). The defendant in the present case,

Billy Ray Jones, however, has made no such claim, and,

consequently, the majority has no reason to address it.

Because, in my view, the majority correctly analyzes

and resolves the claim that the defendant has raised, I

join the majority opinion.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of APAC Customer Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Theodore G. Schwartz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Marc T.
Tanenberg, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to his knowledge:



|/s/ Theodore G. SchwartzName: Theodore G. Schwartz
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 12, 2004 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|/s/ Marc T. TanenbergName: Marc T. Tanenberg
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: March 12, 2004       |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 23





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


      We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration Statements on
Form S-8 (No. 333-74783 and No. 333-74785) of our report dated February 10,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Pharmacia &
Upjohn, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, included in this Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 of Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc.





PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1999
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Luis
F. Saenz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Li3 Energy, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Li3 Energy, Inc.








Date:
      May 17, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Luis F. SaenzName:
            Luis
      F. SaenzTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Li3 Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Li3 Energy, Inc., and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 3:38 PM

To: 'chris@topsailarea.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: Lewis Realty Associates, Inc. (FAA-2015-0195)

May 28, 2015 

Dear Mr. Rackley: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0195). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov