8860 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(5) Do not install any PFD (P/Ns 700–00006– 

000, 700–00006–001, 700–00006–002, 700– 

00006–003, or 700–00006–100) with any affected serial number listed in Avidyne Service 

Bulletin No. 601–00006–096, Revision 1, 

dated July 14, 2008, unless it has passed the 

air data system performance verification test 

or has been factory modified (PFD bears a 

label marked ‘‘Deviation 08–19A’’ on the exterior of the PFD near the TSO label or a 

‘‘MOD 52’’ marking). 

As of April 3, 2009 (the effective date of this 

AD). 

Not applicable. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(g) The Manager, Boston Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Solomon Hecht, 

Aerospace Engineer, ANE–150, Boston 

Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 

01803, telephone: (781) 238–7159, fax: (781) 

238–7170. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector 

(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District 

Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 

FSDO. 

(h) AMOCs approved for AD 2008–06–28 

R1 are approved for this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(i) You must use Avidyne Service Bulletin 

No. 601–00006–096, Revision 1, dated July 

14, 2008, to do the actions required by this 

AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Avidyne Corporation, 55 

Old Bedford Road, Lincoln, MA 01773; 

telephone: (781) 402–7400; fax: (781) 402– 

7599; E-mail: techsupport@avidyne.com; 

Internet: http://www.avidyne.com/. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information incorporated by reference for 

this AD at the FAA, Central Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas 

City, Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the Central 

Region, call (816) 329–3768. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information incorporated by reference 

for this AD at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_

locations.html. 

Appendix to Airworthiness Directive 2009– 

05–05 Limitations Regarding Avidyne 

Primary Flight Displays (PFDs) 

Before conducting flight operations, pilots 

must review and be familiar with the 

Crosscheck Monitor section of the Avidyne 

Primary Flight Display Pilot’s Guide and all 

limitations contained in the aircraft operating 

handbook. 

As a normal practice, all pilots should be 

vigilant in conducting proper preflight and 

in-flight checks of instrument accuracy, 

including: 

• Preflight check of the accuracy of both 

the primary and backup altimeter against 

known airfield elevation and against each 

other. 

• Verification of airspeed indications 

consistent with prevailing conditions at 

startup, during taxi, and prior to takeoff. 

• ‘‘Airspeed alive’’ check and reasonable 

indications during takeoff roll. 

• Maintenance of current altimeter setting 

in both primary and backup altimeters. 

• Cross-check of primary and backup 

altimeters at each change of altimeter setting 

and prior to entering instrument 

meteorological conditions (IMC). 

• Cross-check of primary and backup 

altimeters and validation against other 

available data, such as glideslope intercept 

altitude, prior to conducting any instrument 

approach. 

• Periodic cross-checks of primary and 

backup airspeed indicators, preferably in 

combination with altimeter cross-checks. 

For flight operations under instrument 

flight rules (IFR) or in conditions in which 

visual reference to the horizon cannot be 

reliably maintained (that is IMC, night 

operations, flight operations over water, in 

haze or smoke) and the pilot has reasons to 

suspect that any source (PFD or back-up 

instruments) of attitude, airspeed, or altitude 

is not functioning properly, flight under IFR 

or in these conditions must not be initiated 

(when condition is determined on the 

ground) and further flight under IFR or in 

these conditions is prohibited until 

equipment is serviced and functioning 

properly. 

Operation of aircraft not equipped with 

operating backup (or standby) attitude, 

altimeter, and airspeed indicators that are 

located where they are readily visible to the 

pilot is prohibited. 

Pilots must frequently scan and crosscheck 

flight instruments to make sure the 

information depicted on the PFD correlates 

and agrees with the information depicted on 

the backup instruments. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

February 19, 2009. 

John Colomy, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–4102 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0159; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–175–AD; Amendment 

39–15828; AD 2009–05–04] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier 

Model CL–215–6B11 (CL–215T Variant) 

and CL–215–6B11 (CL–415 Variant) 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier Model CL–215–6B11 (CL– 

215T variant) and CL–215–6B11 (CL– 

415 variant) airplanes. This AD requires 

repetitive inspections for contamination 

of grease, bearing wear checks, grease 

applications of the rudder lower torque 

tube upper bearing, and a rudder upper 

hinge gap check; and related 

investigative and corrective actions if 

necessary. This AD results from a report 

of corrosion on the rudder lower torque 

tube upper bearing. We are issuing this 

AD to detect and correct corroded 

bearings which could lead to hinge 

deformation, and could result in a 

rudder jam and consequent reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

March 16, 2009. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in the AD 

as of March 16, 2009. 

We must receive comments on this 

AD by March 30, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 8861 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 

Coˆte-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec 

H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514–855– 

5000; fax 514–855–7401; e-mail 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet 

http://www.bombardier.com. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Office (telephone 800–647– 

5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments will be available in the AD 

docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ANE– 

171, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone (516) 228–7303; fax 

(516) 794–5531. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the airworthiness 

authority for Canada, notified us that an 

unsafe condition may exist on 

Bombardier Model CL–215–6B11 

(CL–215T variant) and CL–215–6B11 

(CL–415 variant) airplanes. TCCA 

advises that during a routine inspection, 

an operator reported corrosion on the 

rudder lower torque tube upper bearing, 

part number DAT48–64A, on two 

airplanes. These bearings had been 

installed in accordance with 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–4328, 

Revision 3, dated May 20, 2008, as part 

of the torque tube replacement. 

Corroded lower torque tube upper 

bearings can lead to hinge deformation, 

which could result in a rudder jam and 

consequent reduced controllability of 

the airplane. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier has issued Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 215–3151, dated May 5, 

2008 (for 215T variant airplanes); and 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–4394, 

dated May 5, 2008 (for 415 variant 

airplanes). These service bulletins 

describe procedures for repetitive 

detailed inspections for signs of 

contamination, including corrosion/rust 

particles in the flange and housing of 

the rudder lower torque tube upper 

bearing. These service bulletins also 

describe procedures for bearing wear 

checks, and grease applications of the 

rudder lower torque tube upper bearing, 

and a rudder upper hinge gap check; 

and related investigative and corrective 

actions if necessary. Related 

investigative actions include inspecting 

old grease for signs of contamination, 

measuring the distance from the top of 

the bearing housing to the top of the 

lower bearing flange shoulder at 

multiple locations around the bearing, 

and doing a visual inspection to 

determine the cause of the excessive 

wear. Corrective actions include 

replacing the bearing(s) and adjusting 

the hinge gap. TCCA mandated the 

service information and issued 

Canadian airworthiness directive CF– 

2008–29, dated August 20, 2008 

(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to 

ensure the continued airworthiness of 

these airplanes in Canada. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are issuing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Therefore, we are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct corroded bearings 

which can lead to hinge deformation, 

and result in a rudder jam and 

consequent reduced controllability of 

the airplane. This AD requires 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

the service information described 

previously, except as discussed under 

‘‘Differences Between This AD and the 

Canadian Airworthiness Directive.’’ 

Differences Between This AD and the 

Canadian Airworthiness Directive 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215– 

3151, dated May 5, 2008 (for 215T 

variant airplanes); and Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 215–4394, dated May 5, 

2008 (for 415 variant airplanes) 

recommend accomplishing the required 

actions ‘‘before and after every fire 

season,’’ but we find this interval to be 

imprecise and vague. In developing 

appropriate compliance times for this 

AD, we considered not only the 

manufacturer’s recommendation, but 

the degree of urgency associated with 

addressing the subject unsafe condition, 

the average utilization of the affected 

fleet, and the time necessary to perform 

the required actions. In light of all of 

these factors, we find that a 6-month 

repetitive interval for the required 

actions is an appropriate interval of time 

for affected airplanes to continue to 

operate without compromising safety. 

This difference has been coordinated 

with TCCA. 

Interim Action 

We consider this proposed AD 

interim action. If final action is later 

identified, we might consider further 

rulemaking then. 

Costs of Compliance 

None of the airplanes affected by this 

action are on the U.S. Register. All 

airplanes affected by this AD are 

currently operated by non-U.S. 

operators under foreign registry; 

therefore, they are not directly affected 

by this AD action. However, we 

consider this AD necessary to ensure 

that the unsafe condition is addressed if 

any affected airplane is imported and 

placed on the U.S. Register in the future. 

The following table provides the 

estimated costs to comply with this AD 

for any affected airplane that might be 

imported and placed on the U.S. 

Register in the future. 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Work hours 

Average 

labor rate 

per hour 

Parts cost Cost per airplane 

Inspection ................................................................................................. 4 $80 None ......... $320 per inspection cycle. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
8862 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

FAA’s Determination of the Effective 

Date 

No airplane affected by this AD is 

currently on the U.S. Register. 

Therefore, providing notice and 

opportunity for public comment is 

unnecessary before this AD is issued, 

and this AD may be made effective in 

less than 30 days after it is published in 

the Federal Register. 

Comments Invited 

This AD is a final rule that involves 

requirements affecting flight safety, and 

we did not provide you with notice and 

an opportunity to provide your 

comments before it becomes effective. 

However, we invite you to send any 

written data, views, or arguments about 

this AD. Send your comments to an 

address listed under the ADDRESSES

section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 

2009–0159; Directorate Identifier 2008– 

NM–175–AD’’ at the beginning of your 

comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this AD. We will consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and may amend this AD because of 

those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. We prepared a 

regulatory evaluation of the estimated 

costs to comply with this AD and placed 

it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES

section for a location to examine the 

regulatory evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by adding the following new 

airworthiness directive (AD): 

2009–05–04 Bombardier Inc. (Formerly 

Canadair): Amendment 39–15828. 

Docket No. FAA–2009–0159; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–NM–175–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective March 16, 

2009. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to the following 

airplanes, certificated in any category: 

(1) Bombardier Model CL–215–6B11 (CL– 

215T variant) airplanes, serial numbers 1056 

through 1125 inclusive, and 

(2) Bombardier Model CL–215–6B11 (CL– 

415 variant) airplanes, serial numbers 2001 

through 2990 inclusive. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD results from a report of 

corrosion on the rudder lower torque tube 

upper bearing. We are issuing this AD to 

detect and correct corroded bearings which 

could lead to hinge deformation, and could 

result in a rudder jam and consequent 

reduced controllability of the airplane. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Inspections 

(f) Within 6 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do a detailed inspection for 

contamination of grease, a bearing wear 

check, and grease application of the rudder 

lower torque tube upper bearing, and do a 

rudder upper hinge gap check, in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–3151, dated 

May 5, 2008 (for 215T variant airplanes); or 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–4394, dated 

May 5, 2008 (for 415 variant airplanes); as 

applicable. Do all related investigative and 

corrective actions before further flight in 

accordance with the service bulletin, as 

applicable. Repeat the detailed inspection 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 6 months. 

Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a 

detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive 

examination of a specific item, installation, 

or assembly to detect damage, failure, or 

irregularity. Available lighting is normally 

supplemented with a direct source of good 

lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. 

Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying 

lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface 

cleaning and elaborate procedures may be 

required.’’ 

Exception to Service Bulletin Specifications 

(g) Although Bombardier Service Bulletin 

215–3151, dated May 5, 2008; and 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–4394, dated 

May 5, 2008; specify to submit certain 

information to the manufacturer, this AD 

does not include that requirement. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(h) The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), ANE–170, FAA, 

has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 

AD, if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: 

Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe 

and Propulsion Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New 

York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 

Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New 

York 11590; telephone (516) 228–7303; fax 

(516) 794–5531. Before using any approved 

AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC 

applies, notify your principal maintenance 

inspector (PMI) or principal avionics 

inspector (PAI), as appropriate, or lacking a 

principal inspector, your local Flight 

Standards District Office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

Related Information 

(i) Canadian airworthiness directive CF– 

2008–29, dated August 20, 2008, also 

addresses the subject of this AD. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 38 / Friday, February 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 8863 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(j) You must use Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 215–3151, dated May 5, 2008; or 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 215–4394, dated 

May 5, 2008; as applicable; to do the actions 

required by this AD, unless the AD specifies 

otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 CoˆteVertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; e-mail 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// 

www.bombardier.com. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information that is incorporated by reference 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information at the National Archives 

and Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

17, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–3864 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

26 CFR Part 1 

[TD 9441] 

RIN 1545–BI46 

Section 482: Methods To Determine 

Taxable Income in Connection With a 

Cost Sharing Arrangement 

Correction 

In rule document E8–30715 beginning 

on page 340 in the issue of Monday, 

January 5, 2009 make the following 

correction: 

§1.482–7T [Corrected] 

On page 354, in §1.482–7T(b)(5), in 

the second column, in paragraph (5), in 

the second line, ‘‘(i) Situation in which 

Commissioner must treat arrangement 

as a CSA.’’ should read ‘‘(i)Situation in 

which Commissioner must treat 

arrangement as a CSA.’’ 

[FR Doc. Z8–30715 Filed 2–26–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R01–OAR–2008–0485; A–1–FRL– 

8771–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; New 

Hampshire; 2009 Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets for the BostonManchester-Portsmouth (SE), New 

Hampshire, 8-Hour Ozone 

Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of New 

Hampshire. This revision contains 8- 

hour ozone transportation conformity 

emission budgets for the BostonManchester-Portsmouth (SE), New 

Hampshire, 8-hour ozone nonattainment 

area. This action is being taken under 

the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective April 28, 2009, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by March 

30, 2009. If adverse comments are 

received, EPA will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R01–OAR–2008–0485 by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: arnold.anne@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (617) 918–0047. 

4. Mail: ‘‘Docket Identification 

Number EPA–R01–OAR–2008–0485’’, 

Anne Arnold, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA New England 

Regional Office, One Congress Street, 

Suite 1100 (mail code CAQ), Boston, 

MA 02114–2023. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver 

your comments to: Anne Arnold, 

Manager, Air Quality Planning Unit, 

Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, One 

Congress Street, 11th floor, (CAQ), 

Boston, MA 02114–2023. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R01–OAR–2008– 

0485. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, or e-mail, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The http:// 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

http://www.regulations.gov index. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

i.e., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 

New England Regional Office, One 

Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, 

MA. EPA requests that if at all possible, 

you contact the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding legal holidays. 

In addition, copies of the state 

submittal are also available for public 

inspection during normal business 

hours, by appointment at the State Air 

Agency; Air Resources Division, 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES