alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 111th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

111th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2329

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic fittings composed of 
                      perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) resin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 29, 2009

  Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain plastic fittings composed of 
                      perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) resin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PLASTIC FITTINGS COMPOSED OF PERFLUOROALKOXY (PFA) RESIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Plastic fittings    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          composed of                                                        31/2011.......
                          perfluoroalkoxy
                          (PFA) resin with
                          internal
                          diameters ranging
                          from 1.59 mm to
                          35.1 mm (provided
                          for in subheading
                          3917.40.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Thrive World Wide, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, I, Wendy Borow-Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of Thrive World Wide, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




1.Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Thrive World Wide, Inc.


Date: May 23, 2011
By:
/s/ Wendy Borow-JohnsonWendy Borow-Johnson, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Principle Accounting Officer
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 9 (Friday, January 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-609]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7755]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso and the Parisian 
Avant-Garde''

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 1, 2011, notice was published on page 18292 of the 
Federal Register (volume 76, number 63) of determinations made by the 
Department of State pertaining to the exhibition ``The Steins Collect: 
Matisse, Picasso and the Parisian Avant-Garde.'' This notice was 
corrected by a November 18, 2011, notice published on page 71616 of the 
Federal Register (volume 76, number 223) as to the number of objects 
covered at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. These two referenced notices 
are now corrected as to additional objects to be included in the 
exhibition. Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that additional objects to 
be included in the exhibition ``The Steins Collect: Matisse, Picasso 
and the Parisian Avant-Garde'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
additional objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the 
foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the additional exhibit objects at The Metropolitan Museum of 
Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 22, 2012, until on or 
about June 3, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the additional exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, 
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: (202) 632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 9, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-609 Filed 1-12-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
On June 6, 2013, Victor Wicklund, Manager, Propulsion & Mechanical Systems, ANM-112, FAA 

Transport Airplane Directorate Standards Staff, contacted Boeing to clarify whether a 3-year 

full-compliance time provided for the 767 applies to the 737, 747 and 777 airplane models as 

well.
#### Charles F. Grannis and May W. Strong, as Administrators of the estate of Caleb A. Granniss, deceased, Plaintiffs in Errror, vs. Florida Pebble Phosphate Company, a corporation under the laws of Florida, W. B. Makinson, M. Katz, R. E. Rose and E. D. Beggs, Defendants in Error.

(Supreme Court of Florida, Division B,

June 27, 1905.)

*616Writ of Error to Circuit Court, Osceola County; Minor S. Jones, Judge.

*W. E. Jewell,*for Plaintiffs in Error.

*P. A. Vans Agnew,*and *Massey*<£• *Wallow,*for Defendants in Error.

Decision

Per Curiam.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the defendants in error. There was judgment for the defendants and the plaintiffs take writ of error. The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6904

EDWARD K. NELSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES; JANE DOE, an unknown Parole Officer; JOHN DOE, Parole Officer; JIM MCCLAIN, Interstate Parole Officer; ALICE CHIAPORRI, Parole Officer, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-1349-19BD) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edward K. Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on May 23, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 24, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM:Edward Nelson appeals the district court's denial of his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge reveals this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning that federal courts cannot issue writs of mandamus to compel action by state officials or agencies. See Nelson v. South Carolina Dep’t of Probation , No. CA00-1349-19BD (D.S.C. May 24, 2000); * see also Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County, 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                        89
<INVENTORY>                                        958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,327
<PP&E>                                           5,820
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,688
<BONDS>                                            394<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        282
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,380
<SALES>                                          6,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,710
<CGS>                                            2,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,217<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    468
<INCOME-TAX>                                       145
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                323
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
<FN>
<F1>Does not include guarantee of ESOP debt of 240.
<F2>Only includes R&D expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering (25104).                    

*Date and Time:*                         March 19, 2012, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. March 20, 2012, 8:30 a.m.-noon.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room Stafford II-595, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert Webber, Office of International Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-7569. If you are attending the meeting and need access to the NSF, please contact the individual listed above so your name may be added to the building access list.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning support for research, education and related activities involving the U.S. science and engineering community working in a global context, as well as strategic efforts to promote a more effective NSF role in international science and engineering.                    

*Agenda:*                         Review NSF international activities, and discuss and develop recommendations to transform international research and educations partnerships.                    

Dated: March 1, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-5399 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emanuel P.N. Hilario, as Chief Financial Officer of Einstein Noah Restaurant Group, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |     |  |                                             
|-------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|March 15, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/    EMANUEL P.N.
HILARIO                 
|               |  |     |  | Emanuel P.N. Hilario Chief Financial Officer

This certification is furnished
with this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6293

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Fat Sammy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CR-93-369-B, CA-97-2980-B)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen S. Zimmermann,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court order denying his

motion for discovery. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994),

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a

final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal

as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Waseca County Bank *vs.*Charles McKenna.

November 29, 1884.

Taxation — Sale of Bank Stock — Injunction.—A bank cannot maintain an action to restrain the collector of taxes from levying upon and selling the shares of individual stockholders for taxes upon such shares.

The plaintiff, a banking corporation under the laws of the state, brought this action in the district court for Waseca county, to restrain the defendant, the treasurer of the county, from making sale of the shares of stock of the bank for taxes levied thereon. In its complaint it professes to sue on behalf of all its stockholders, and sets forth matters which it alleges vitiated the assessment of the tax. The action was tried before *Buckham,*J., who ordered judgment for defendant, which was entered, and the plaintiff appealed.

*Lewis & Leslie,*for appellant, in support of plaintiff’s right to maintain the action on behalf of its shareholders, cited *Hills*v. *Nat.*Bank, 12 Fed. Rep. 93; *Cummings*v. *Nat. Bank,*101 U. S. 153; *Belton*v. *Nat. Bank,*101 U. S. 143; *City‘Nat. Bank*v. *City of*Paducah,-5 Cent. L. J. 347.

*P. McGovern,*for respondent.

Gilfillan, C. J.

The plaintiff is not in position to maintain this action. Not having in its hands any dividends due stockholders, (we *469do not wish to express an opinion whether that would make any difference,) the only thing which the defendant as treasurer can do is to levy upon and sell the shares of stock of individual stockholders for the tax upon such shares. This is all that he threatens to do, and is what the action seeks to enjoin him from doing. Such sale would have the effect only to transfer, to whomsoever should purchase at the sale, the title to the stock sold. This would not affect the bank in any other way, nor be any more a wrong against it, than would a transfer by the stockholders themselves. The wrong, if any, in making the levy and sale would be a wrong against the individual stockholders, and not against the bank. It has, therefore, no legal interest in the matter. We are referred to several decisions upholding suits by banks to restrain such levies and sales. But such decisions could not be made under a statute which requires, as ours does, that “every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.”

The suggestion that the action will prevent a multiplicity of suits {that is, of' the individual stockholders) does not help the plaintiff; for one having no interest in the controversy cannot maintain an action on the ground that otherwise there may be a multiplicity of suits by those who are interested.

The court below did not decide the case on this point, but it presents an insuperable objection to any other judgment than one in favor of defendant.

Judgment affirmed.
EX-4.1






EXHIBIT 4.1




Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2005, among SFX Entertainment, Inc. (now known as Live
Nation Worldwide, Inc.) and the Foreign Borrowers party thereto, as Borrowers, and CCE Spinco, Inc.
(now known as Live Nation, Inc.), the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Toronto Branch, as Canadian Agent, J.P. Morgan
Europe Limited, as London Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc. and Bank of America Securities LLC, as Co-Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of Live Nation Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed
December 23, 2005)